alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 696 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 696

Making minority party appointments for certain committees for the 111th 
                               Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 7, 2010

Mr. McConnell submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Making minority party appointments for certain committees for the 111th 
                               Congress.

    Resolved, That the following be the minority membership on the 
following committees for the remainder of the 111th Congress, or until 
their successors are appointed:
    Committee on Armed Services: Mr. McCain, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Sessions, 
Mr. Chambliss, Mr. Graham, Mr. Thune, Mr. Wicker, Mr. LeMieux, Mr. 
Brown, Mr. Burr, Mr. Vitter, Ms. Collins, and Mr. Kirk.
    Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs: Ms. 
Collins, Mr. Coburn, Mr. Brown, Mr. McCain, Mr. Voinovich, Mr. Ensign, 
Mr. Graham, and Mr. Kirk.
    Committee on Veterans' Affairs: Mr. Burr, Mr. Isakson, Mr. Wicker, 
Mr. Johanns, Mr. Brown, Mr. Graham, and Mr. Kirk.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

Statement of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code as
adopted

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, John Aglialoro, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
Cybex International, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that:

The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ended September 30, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |                                     
|------------------------ |  | ------------------------------------
|Dated: November 13, 2006 |  | /s/ John Aglialoro                  
|                         |  | John Aglialoro                      
|                         |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO CYBEX INTERNATIONAL, INC.
AND WILL BE RETAINED BY CYBEX INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND WILL BE FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
# C_2019158EN.01000101.xml

| 10.5.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 158/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.5.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 158/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9211 — TransDigm Group/Esterline Technologies)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 158/01)

On 11 March 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9211. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9211. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                   Exhibit 12



                                                  Three Months
                                                     Ended
(Thousands of dollars)                           March 31, 1998
                                                 --------------
Earnings

Income before interest expense  . . . . . . . .     $11,082

Add:
Income tax items  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .       4,592
Income tax on other income  . . . . . . . . . .         620
Amortization of debt discount, premium expense.          56
Allowance for funds used during construction -
   borrowed funds  . . . . . . . . . . . . . .           13
Interest on rentals . . . . . . . . . . . . . .         238
                                                    -------
   Total Earnings  . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      $16,601
                                                    =======
Fixed Charges

Interest on long-term debt  . . . . . . . . . .     $ 2,423
Other interest  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .         257
Amortization of debt discount, premium expense           56
Interest on rentals . . . . . . . . . . . . . .         238
                                                    -------
   Total Fixed Charges . . . . . . . . . . . .      $ 2,974
                                                    =======
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges  . . . . . .        5.58
                                                    =======
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 632 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 632

       Honoring the work of the United Service Organizations and 
congratulating the United Service Organizations on the sending of their 
                    2 millionth troop care package.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 21, 2010

   Mr. Reid (for himself and Mr. McConnell) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
       Honoring the work of the United Service Organizations and 
congratulating the United Service Organizations on the sending of their 
                    2 millionth troop care package.

Whereas the United Service Organizations (referred to in this preamble as the 
        ``USO'') has worked to serve members of the Armed Forces and their 
        families for nearly 70 years;
Whereas the USO provides morale and support services to military families in 
        more than 130 locations across the world;
Whereas the USO continues to support veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan Wars;
Whereas the USO provides comfort to members of the Armed Forces by sending care 
        packages to bases overseas; and
Whereas the USO and their volunteers have sent 2,000,000 care packages to our 
        troops: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) recognizes the work of the United Service Organizations 
        in supporting the members of the Armed Forces of the United 
        States around the world; and
            (2) congratulates the United Service Organizations on 
        sending their 2 millionth troop care package.
                                 <all>
```
|                                                                        
|------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                          
|View History:                                                           
|                                                                        
|Kentucky Natural Gas Industrial Price  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                        
|                                                                        
|Kentucky Natural Gas Industrial Price  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 4.19   | 4.00   | 3.32  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 4.82   | 6.51   | 4.63   | 6.54   | 7.38   | 9.90   | 9.64   | 8.37   | 10.41  | 6.04  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 5.57   | 5.16   | 3.96   | 4.84   | 5.78   | 4.37   | 3.84   | 4.46   | 4.40   | 4.06  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 3.50   | 5.04   | 7.84   | 4.27   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
#### State v. Malin

111,712

07/22/2015

Denied

Unpublished
No. 12-6295.

#### Mateo-De Los Santos *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Thompson v. State

106,216

07/19/13

Denied.

Unpublished
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Lufkin Industries, Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Douglas
      V. Smith, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
            The
              Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
              as
              applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
              and





(2)
            The
              information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
              respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
              Company.





/s/
      R.
      D. Leslie





R.D.
      Leslie


Chief
      Financial Officer


November
      8, 2006





This
      certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. §1350, and not for any
      other purpose.
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed July 5, 2023. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D23-433 Lower Tribunal No. F16-25825

________________ 

### Randolph Codner , Appellant, vs. 

### The State of Florida , Appellee. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Andrea R. Wolfson, Judge. Randolph Codner, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee. Before EMAS, LINDSEY and GORDO, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
# C_2019180EN.01001601.xml

| 24.5.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 180/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.5.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 180/16

---

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 April 2019 to 30 April 2019

(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC (1)
  or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC (2)
  )

(2019/C 180/02)

| — | Issuing, maintenance or modification of a national marketing authorisation |
| --- | --- |

—

Issuing, maintenance or modification of a national marketing authorisation

| Date of the decision | Name(s) of the medicinal product | INN (International Non-Proprietary Name) | Holder(s) of the marketing authorisation | Member State concerned | Date of notification |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2.4.2019 | Angiotensin-II-receptor antagonists (sartans) containing a tetrazole group | sartan | Not applicable | Not applicable | 3.4.2019 |

Date of the decision

Name(s) of the medicinal product

INN (International Non-Proprietary Name)

Holder(s) of the marketing authorisation

Member State concerned

Date of notification

2.4.2019

Angiotensin-II-receptor antagonists (sartans) containing a tetrazole group

sartan

Not applicable

Not applicable

3.4.2019

---

(1)  OJ L 311, 28.11.2001, p. 67.

(2)  OJ L 311, 28.11.2001, p. 1.

---
NUMBER 13-22-00226-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

 

GERARDO CASTILLO, Appellant,

v.

U.S. BANK, N.A., SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE 

TO LASALLE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, 

ON BEHALF OF THE HOLDERS OF BEAR 

STEARNS ASSET BAKED SECURITIES I 

TRUST 2007-HE7, ASSET-BACKED 

CERTIFICATES SERIES 2007-HE7, Appellees.

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

ORDER TO FILE APPELLANT’S BRIEF

Before Justices Benavides, Hinojosa, and Tijerina

Order Per Curiam

This cause is currently before the Court on appellant’s second amended motion 

for extension of time to file brief. The Court, having fully examined and considered the 
2

extensions previously granted in this cause and appellant’s pending motion is of the 

opinion that the extension requested should be granted by Order.

It is therefore ordered that pro se appellant Gerardo Castillo file an appellate brief

with this Court on or before 5:00 p.m. on January 27, 2023. Appellant is reminded the 

Court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution, unless appellant complies with this 

order or timely requests an extension which reasonably explains the failure and

appellees are not significantly injured by the appellant’s failure to timely file a 

brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b),(c).

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

22nd day of December, 2022.
IV 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 4 

Expressing the sense of Congress that the Supreme Court misinterpreted 

the First Amendment to the Constitution in the case of Buckley v. Valeo. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 5, 2011 

Ms. KAPTUR submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of Congress that the Supreme Court 

misinterpreted the First Amendment to the Constitution 

in the case of Buckley v. Valeo. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that the Su3 preme Court misinterpreted the First Amendment to the 

4 Constitution in its decision in the 1976 case of Buckley 

5 v. Valeo because— 

6 (1) the decision failed to recognize that the un7 limited spending of large amounts of money on elec8 tions has a corrosive effect on the electoral process 

9 not simply because of direct transactions between 

10 those who give large amounts of money and canmstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HCON 4 IH 

1 didates and elected officials but because the presence 

2 of unlimited amounts of money corrupts the process 

3 on a more fundamental level; and 

4 (2) the decision failed to recognize other legiti5 mate state interests which justify limiting money in 

6 campaigns, including the need to preserve the integ7 rity of our republican form of government, restore 

8 public confidence in government, and ensure all citi9 zens a more equal opportunity to participate in the 

10 political process. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 21.1
  Subsidiary1.
    
    Castings LLC, a Delaware limited liability company2.
    
    Southwest Steel I, LLC, a Texas limited liability company3.
    
    Southwest Steel II, LLC, a Texas limited liability company4.
    
    Southwest Steel III, LLC, a Texas limited liability company5.
    
    ARI Fleet Services of Canada, Inc., a corporation registered in Ontario, Canada6.
    
    ARI Acquisition Sub, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company7.
    
    Amrail Industries, Inc., a Delaware corporation8.
    
    ARI Longtrain, Inc., a Delaware corporation9.
    
    ARI Component Venture, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company10.
    
    ARI Mauritius I, a Mauritius corporation11.
    
    ARI DMU, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
**Exhibit 32.4******Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003**

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Madison Gas and Electric Company for theperiod ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof("the Report"), I, Terry A. Hanson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that:

1.	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.
/s/ Terry A. Hanson
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and SecretaryAugust 14, 2003**
#### State v. Morgan

108,043

10/28/13

Denied.

Unpublished
# C_2019333EN.01000101.xml

| 4.10.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 333/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.10.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 333/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9528 — Macquarie Infrastructure and Real Assets/Currenta)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 333/01)

On 26 September 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9528. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9528. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                        484,508 
<SECURITIES>                                   50,000 
<RECEIVABLES>                              16,331,341 
<ALLOWANCES>                                1,105,261 
<INVENTORY>                                         0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           21,765,805       
<PP&E>                                     29,376,588      
<DEPRECIATION>                             12,270,879    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             39,576,355      
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      16,360,783    
<BONDS>                                             0  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0 
<PREFERRED>                                         0 
<COMMON>                                    8,966,258 
<OTHER-SE>                                  3,569,295       
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               39,576,355         
<SALES>                                    46,834,647          
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           46,834,647          
<CGS>                                      25,936,345          
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              25,936,345          
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           17,087,938       
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0      
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            542,861       
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             3,346,659       
<INCOME-TAX>                                1,431,466      
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         1,915,193      
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0      
<CHANGES>                                           0  
<NET-INCOME>                                1,915,193 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .27 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .27 
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 72 (Tuesday, April 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 18364]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-9674]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-33,129]


Dallas Manufacturing Company, Selma, AL; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation 
was initiated on January 27, 1997 in response to a worker petition 
which was filed on January 13, 1997 on behalf of workers at Dallas 
Manufacturing Company, Selma, Alabama.
    All workers were separated from the subject firm more than one year 
prior to the date of the petition. Section 223 of the Act specifies 
that no certification may apply to any worker whose last separation 
occurred more than one year before the date of the petition. 
Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no 
purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed in Washington, D.C. this 25th day of March, 1997.
Russell T. Kile,
Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 97-9674 Filed 4-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
#### COM. v. HALL, M.

1793 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/14/2017

CP-48-CR-0002103-2014

(Northampton)

Affirmed