alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

      

<ARTICLE> UT
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<PERIOD-TYPE>				   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      278,794
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     10,181
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          60,000
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        24,584
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                  12,202
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 385,761
<COMMON>                                        29,063
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       58,262
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             47,219
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 134,544
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                            90,059 
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              47,588
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0 
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0 
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   20,167
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                      1,528
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                 1,086
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                  90,789
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  385,761
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                       77,822
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             8,675
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      53,072
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      61,747
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         16,075
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 272
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  16,347
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         2,135
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,212
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   14,212
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         2,917
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        2,043
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          17,931
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.63

          

</TABLE>
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

May 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133291 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

GREAT LAKES TOWING COMPANY, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 133291 

 COA: 271556 

Court of Claims: 04-000152-MT 

DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 16, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0521 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

May 30, 2007 

 Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 117 Engrossed in House (EH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 117

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF THE CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR NATIONAL PEACE OFFICERS' 
              MEMORIAL SERVICE.

    (a) In General.--The Grand Lodge of the Fraternal Order of Police 
and its auxiliary (in this resolution 

              

referred to as the ``sponsor'') shall be permitted to sponsor a public 
event, the 31st Annual National Peace Officers' Memorial Service (in 
this resolution referred to as the ``event''), on the Capitol Grounds, 
in order to honor the law enforcement officers who died in the line of 
duty during 2011.
    (b) Date of Event.--The event shall be held on May 15, 2012, or on 
such other date as the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the 
Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate jointly designate.

SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

    (a) In General.--Under conditions to be prescribed by the Architect 
of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board, the event shall be--
            (1) free of admission charge and open to the public; and
            (2) arranged not to interfere with the needs of Congress.
    (b) Expenses and Liabilities.--The sponsor shall assume full 
responsibility for all expenses and liabilities incident to all 
activities associated with the event.

SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS.

    Subject to the approval of the Architect of the Capitol, the 
sponsor is authorized to erect upon the Capitol Grounds such stage, 
sound amplification devices, and other related structures and 
equipment, as may be required for the event.

SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

    The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 
restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of title 40, United States 
Code, concerning sales, advertisements, displays, and solicitations on 
the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions applicable to the 
Capitol Grounds, in connection with the event.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 7, 2012.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
112th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 117

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

   Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the National Peace 
                      Officers' Memorial Service.
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 76 (Tuesday, April 21, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 19758]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10496]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice 98-056]


NASA Advisory Council (NAC), Technology and Commercialization 
Advisory Committee (TCAC); Meeting

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public 
Law 92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration announces a meeting of the NASA Advisory Council, 
Technology and Commercialization Advisory Committee.

DATES: Wednesday, May 20, 1998, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. and Thursday, May 
21, 1998, 8 a.m. to 1 p.m.

ADDRESSES: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Room MIC-7, 
300 E Street, SW, Washington, DC 20546.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Gregory M. Reck, Code AF, National 
Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC 20546 (202/358-
4700).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be open to the public up to 
the seating capacity of the room. The agenda for the meeting is as 
follows:

--Report from liaison members with other advisory committees on 
activities related to technology
--Review of NASA space commercialization activities
--Discussion of charter for review of the Human Exploration and 
Development Enterprise technology program

    It is imperative that the meeting be held on these dates to 
accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants. Visitors 
will be requested to sign a visitor's register.

    Dated: April 14, 1998.
Matthew M. Crouch,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 98-10496 Filed 4-20-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-M
|                                                                
|----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                  
|View History:                                                   
|                                                                
|Indiana Natural Gas Industrial Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                
|                                                                
|Indiana Natural Gas Industrial Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |         | 290,098 | 287,292 | 311,704
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 298,533 | 250,766 | 259,059 | 248,666 | 262,882 | 264,020 | 263,807 | 272,551 | 272,208 | 244,975
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 289,314 | 326,573 | 344,678 | 356,690 | 375,788 | 372,537 | 370,944 | 379,118 | 419,146 | 426,408
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 376,913 | 389,799 | 388,827 | 401,931 |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
#### U.S. Bank NA v. McConnell

107,300

10/28/13

Denied.

48 Kan. App. 2d 892
# C_2019315EN.01000102.xml

| 19.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 315/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 315/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9514 — Bain Capital Investors/Kantar)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 315/02)

On 9 September 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9514. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9514. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Attachment V 

COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST FOR SIP REVISION 

WESTERN MOJAVE DESERT 8-HOUR OZONE ATTAINMENT PLAN 

Planning Area Includes: Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District (AVAQMD) and Mojave Desert 

Air Quality Management District (MDAQMD) 

Title 40 CFR, Part 51, Appendix V – 

Criteria for Determining the Completeness 

of Plan Submissions 

Enclosed Notes 

ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS 

2.1(a) Submittal Letter from Governor's 

Designee X Included 

2.1(b) Evidence of Adoption X 

• See certified copy of MDAQMD 

Board minutes. 

• See certified copy of AVAQMD 

Board minutes. 

2.1(c) Legal Authority Citation X See ARB Resolution 08-26 

2.1(d) Copy of : 

a. Attainment Plan 

b: Contingency Measures 

X • See MDAQMD Plan, Chapter 3. 

• See AVAQMD Plan, Chapter 3. 

2.1(e) Evidence of Compliance with State's 

Procedural Requirements X 

• MDAQMD: See certified copy of 

MDAQMD Board minutes and 

Board Resolution. 

• AVAQMD: See certified copy of 

AVAQMD Board minutes and 

Board Resolution. 

2.1(f) Evidence of Public Notice Consistent with 

40 CFR part 51.102 X 

• MDAQMD: See “Proof of 

Publication”. 

• AVAQMD: See “Proof of 

Publication”. 

2.1(g) Certification of Public Hearing in 

Accordance with Notice X 

• MDAQMD: See certified copy of 

Board Resolution. 

• AVAQMD: See certified copy of 

Board Resolution. 

2.1(h) Compilation of Public Comments and 

Responses X No public comments were received. 

2.2(a) Identification of Regulated Pollutant X • See MDAQMD Plan, Chapter 1. 

• See AVAQMD Plan, Chapter 1. 

2.2(b) Identification of Attainment Area/Status X • See MDAQMD Plan, Chapter 1. 

• See AVAQMD Plan, Chapter 1. 

2.2(c) Estimate of Plan's Impact on Emissions X 

• See MDAQMD Plan, Chapter 4 

and Appendix E. 

• See AVAQMD Plan, Chapter 4 

and Appendix E. 

2.2(d) Demonstration that Plan 

Approval/Implementation Protects 

NAAQS 

X 

• See MDAQMD Plan, Chapter 4 

and Appendix E. 

• See AVAQMD Plan, Chapter 4 

and Appendix E. 

2.2(e) Modeling Support X • See MDAQMD Plan, Chapter 4 

and Appendix E. 
• See AVAQMD Plan, Chapter 4 

and Appendix E. 

2.2(f)- Compliance/Enforcement and 

2.2(i) Justification NA Not Applicable 

MDAQMD Plan = MDAQMD Ozone Attainment Plan adopted on June 9, 2008. 

AVAQMD Plan = AVAQMD Ozone Attainment Plan adopted on May 20, 2008.
# C_2023278EN.01002902.xml

| 7.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 278/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 278/29

---

Order of the General Court of 20 June 2023 — Marico v EUIPO — Regal Impex (SAFFOLA)

(Case T-611/22) (1)

(2023/C 278/41)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 441, 21.11.2022.

---
|                                                                      
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                        
|View History:                                                         
|                                                                      
|Natural Gas Citygate Price in Texas  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                      
|                                                                      
|Natural Gas Citygate Price in Texas  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        | 3.91   | 3.43   | 2.55   | 2.52   | 3.05   | 3.33  
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 3.14   | 2.88   | 3.06   | 3.32   | 3.00   | 2.95   | 3.22   | 3.66   | 2.63   | 2.84  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 4.39   | 5.13   | 3.86   | 5.53   | 6.03   | 8.09   | 7.60   | 7.84   | 9.20   | 5.59  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 5.89   | 5.39   | 4.30   | 4.89   | 5.77   | 4.19   | 4.09   | 4.80   | 5.04   | 3.02  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2.70   | 10.76  | 6.82   | 4.32   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
#### State v. Shinkle

112,064

10/09/2015

Denied

Unpublished
EXHIBIT
31.1


CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
Anthony Tracy, certify that:




1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Perf-Go Green Holdings,
Inc.;




2. Based upon my
knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;




3. Based upon my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;




4. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the registrant and
have:




(a) Designed such
disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;




(b) Intentionally
omitted;




(c) Evaluated the
effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of th e period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; and




(d) Disclosed in
this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize
and  report financial data; and




(b) Any fraud,
whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.






Dated:
      July 14, 2009
            
            /s/ Anthony TracyPresident,
      Chief Executive Office and Director
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lufkin Industries, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, R.D.
Leslie, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
(S)1350, as adopted pursuant to (S)906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

  /s/ R. D. Leslie
------------------------------

R.D. Leslie
Chief Financial Officer
May 6, 2003

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. (S)1350, and not
for any other purpose.

                                       21
P.1 

OAR Box 1802 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

27) IV-E-22 

Docket Number: 

A-90-37 

Printed 11/4/2008 11:57:59 AM Sheet 27 of 117 
P.2 

From: KAREN BLANCHARD 

To: Wegman-Lydia 

Date: 8/5/981:12pm 

Subject: Conv w Bill Lewis.... 

Per your request, I called Bill Lewis and told him about the extension of the comment period on the NOA until Sept 

14 He indicated disappointment that we did not give the 60 days that was requested and also indicated that the 

industry litigants would probably have gone along with extending the settlement date by 60 days. 

Further....he said that there are likely to be unintended consequences if we pursue what is laid out in the 

notice such as to discourage expansion projects that would have good controls for fear of triggering 

NSR...capping emissions at actuals would he believes prevent growth and have other adverse consequences....he 

believes that since Title V there are a lot more internal controls, due to certifications etc that companies are doing 

what they should...he said that these are not new comments and that you were aware of his views on these 

things from many previous meetings. 

CC: Crumpler-Dennis,Kellam-Bob,Sewell-Mike