alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 12.2**
Certification
I, Victor Vial, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Copa Holdings, S.A.;
 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of thecompany as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 4. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internalcontrol over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the companyand have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to thecompany, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control overfinancial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regardingthe reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented inthis report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as ofthe end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 5. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: July 2, 2007
/s/ Victor Vial
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 73 (Thursday, April 16, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 18942]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10161]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Mathematical Sciences; Notice of 
Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting.

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Mathematical Sciences (1204).
    Date and Time: May 7-8, 1998, 8:30 a.m.-5:00 p.m.
    Place: Room 1020 National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson 
Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Alvin I. Thaler, Program Officer, Infrastructure 
Program, Room 1025 National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson 
Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 306-1880.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning applications submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate proposals concerning the 
Scientific Computing Research Environments for the Mathematical 
Science (SCREMS) program as part of the selection process for 
awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. 
These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: April 13, 1998.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-10161 Filed 4-15-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
Motion GRANTED and Order filed January 4 , 2021

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 20

- 00874

- CR NO. 14

- 20

- 00875

- CR

____________ IN RE THE STATE OF TEXAS EX REL

. KIM OGG , HARRIS COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY , Relator

O RIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS WRIT OF PROHIBITION Co unty Crim inal C our t at Law No

. 7 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2269615



### ORDER

On December 31, 2020 , relator the State of Texas Ex Rel, Kim Ogg , Harris County District Attorney, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. Relator asks this court to order the Honorable Andrew Wright, Judge of Co unty Crim inal
C our t at Law No

. 7 , in Harris County , Texas, to set aside his December 9, 2020 order2 setting the underlying case for a nonjury trial entered in trial court number 2269615 , styled The State of Texas v. Lisa Murcia

. Relator has also filed a petition for writ of prohibition, in which relator see ks to prevent Judge Wright from conducting a nonjury trial in the underlying case.
Relator has also filed a motion for temporary stay of proceedings below. See
Tex. R. App. P

. 52.8(b), 52.10. On December 31, 2020, relator ask ed this court to stay proceedings in the trial court pending a decision on the petition s for writ of
mandamus and prohibition

. It appears from the facts stated in the petition and motion that relator’s request for relief requires further consideration and th at relator will be prejudiced unless immediate temporary relief is granted. We therefore GRANT relator’s motion and issue the following order:

We ORDER all proceedings in trial court cause number 2269615 , The State of Texas v. Lisa Murcia

, STAYED until a final decision by this court on relator’s petition s for writ of mandamus and prohibition , or until further order of this court.
In addition, the court requests real party in interest Lisa Murcia to file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus on or before January 2 5 , 2021

. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.4.

PER CURIAM

Panel c onsists of Chie f Justice Christopher and Justices Wise an d Hassan.
#### State v. Bishop

111,068

07/27/2015

Denied.

Unpublished
No. 12-5834.

#### Carroll *v.*Florida.

Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 3d Dist. Certiorari denied.
|                                                                              
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                
|View History:                                                                 
|                                                                              
|Texas Natural Gas Deliveries to Electric Power Consumers  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                              
|                                                                              
|Texas Natural Gas Deliveries to Electric Power Consumers  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0    | Year-1    | Year-2    | Year-3    | Year-4    | Year-5    | Year-6    | Year-7    | Year-8    | Year-9   
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | ---------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |           |           |           |           |           |           |           | 1,231,541 | 1,440,704 | 1,444,716
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 1,577,563 | 1,506,112 | 1,550,292 | 1,453,858 | 1,394,408 | 1,466,263 | 1,463,658 | 1,473,555 | 1,440,043 | 1,387,421
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 1,348,656 | 1,454,413 | 1,516,946 | 1,422,600 | 1,425,134 | 1,623,836 | 1,534,063 | 1,370,474 | 1,643,854 | 1,787,199
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1,738,761 | 1,626,481 | 1,797,397 | 1,951,685 |           |           |           |           |           |          
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
No. 12-5819.

#### Robertson *v.*Cartinhour.

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### John M. Denman Oil Co. v. Kansas Corporation Comm’n

110,861

09/24/2015

Denied.

51 Kan. App. 2d 98
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 73 (Wednesday, April 16, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 18647]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-9782]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Minerals Management Service (MMS)


Minerals Management Advisory Board; Outer Continental Shelf 
(OCS); Scientific Committee (SC); Announcement of Plenary Session

    This Notice is issued in accordance with the provisions of the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix I, 
and the Office of Management and Budget Circular A-63, Revised.
    The Minerals Management Advisory Board OCS SC will meet in plenary 
session on Wednesday, May 21 and on Thursday, May 23, 1997, from 8:30 
a.m. to 5 p.m. at Scripps Institution of Oceanography, Hubbs Hall 
Conference Room, La Jolla, California.
    The OCS SC is an outside group of scientists which advises the 
Director, MMS, on the feasibility, appropriateness, and scientific 
merit of the MMS' OCS Environmental Studies Program (ESP) as related to 
information needed for informed OCS decisionmaking.

Discussions will focus on:

<bullet> Deepwater Development Issues
<bullet> Coastal Marine Institutes
<bullet> Moratoria Subcommittee Report
<bullet> Committee Business and Resolutions

    The meetings are open to the public. Approximately 30 visitors can 
be accommodated on a first-come-first-served basis at the plenary 
session.
    A copy of the agenda may be requested from the MMS by writing Ms. 
Phyllis Clark at the address below or by electronic mail at Phyllis __ 
Clark @MMS.GOV. Other inquiries concerning the OCS SC meeting should be 
addressed to Dr. Ken Turgeon, Executive Secretary to the OCS Scientific 
Committee, Minerals Management Service, 381 Elden Street, Mail Stop 
4041, Herndon, Virginia 20170-4817. He may be reached by telephone at 
(703) 787-1717, and by electronic mail at Ken __ <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection" class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3165444356545e5f717c7c621f767e671f">[email protected]</a>

    Dated: April 10, 1997.
Carolita U. Kallaur,
Associate Director for Offshore Minerals Management.
[FR Doc. 97-9782 Filed 4-15-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4041-MR-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 12-5054.

#### Surgent *v.*United States.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 619 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 619

Expressing the sense of the Senate that the Senate of each new Congress 
             is not bound by the Rules of previous Senates.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 14, 2010

 Mr. Udall of New Mexico submitted the following resolution; which was 
         referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the Senate that the Senate of each new Congress 
             is not bound by the Rules of previous Senates.

Whereas section 5 of article I of the United States Constitution states ``Each 
        House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings'', with no requirement 
        for a supermajority to adopt or amend the rules of either House;
Whereas it is a longstanding common law principle, upheld in Supreme Court 
        decisions such as United States v. Ballin, that one legislature cannot 
        bind subsequent legislatures;
Whereas advisory rulings by Vice Presidents Nixon, Humphrey, and Rockefeller, 
        sitting as the President of the Senate, have stated that a Senate at the 
        beginning of a Congress is not bound by the cloture requirement imposed 
        by a previous Senate and may end debate on a proposal to adopt or amend 
        the Standing Rules of the Senate by a majority vote; and
Whereas the provision in rule XXII that requires a two-thirds vote of Senators 
        present and voting to limit debate on a measure or motion to amend the 
        Senate Rules is unconstitutional because its effect is to deny a 
        majority of the Senate of each new Congress from proceeding to a vote to 
        determine its own rules: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate of each new Congress is not bound by the 
rules of previous Senates and should, upon a motion by a Senator to 
bring debate to a close, if said motion receives the affirmative vote 
of a majority of the Senators duly chosen and sworn, proceed to 
determine the Rules of its Proceedings in accordance with section 5 of 
article I of the Constitution.
                                 <all>
```
#### COM. v. WISE, Q.

1366 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/12/2017

CP-51-CR-0000732-2016

(Philadelphia)

Affirmed
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2019189EN.01004501.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 5.6.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 189/45 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9385 — Orange/SecureLink)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 189/13)

1.

On 24 May 2019, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2019189EN.01004501-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Orange SA (‘Orange’, France), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | SL Bidco BV (‘SecureLink’, Netherlands). |

Orange acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of SecureLink.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for Orange: the provision of electronic communications services mainly in the area of fixed-line, internet and mobile telephony in a number of countries worldwide;

—   for SecureLink: the provision of cyber security infrastructure and managed services to corporate and institutional clients.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2019189EN.01004501-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9385 — Orange/SecureLink

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2019189EN.01004501-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2019189EN.01004501-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-1-1995
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                          0
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   2,280,805
<ALLOWANCES>                    58,109
<INVENTORY>                     3,651,205
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                6,051,314
<PP&E>                          10,818,667
<DEPRECIATION>                  3,340,767
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  14,215,589
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           5,904,964
<BONDS>                         0
<COMMON>                        74,618
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<OTHER-SE>                      7,460,751
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    14,215,589
<SALES>                         10,697,076
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                10,697,076
<CGS>                           8,573,311
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   10,210,979
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                (130,755)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              330,376
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 286,476
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             286,476
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    286,476
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                   0
        


</TABLE>
#### State v. Womelsdorf

105,880

08/19/13

Denied.

47 Kan. App. 2d 307
|                                                                          
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                            
|View History:                                                             
|                                                                          
|Natural Gas Citygate Price in Louisiana  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                          
|                                                                          
|Natural Gas Citygate Price in Louisiana  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        | 3.78   | 3.55   | 2.95   | 2.38   | 3.09   | 2.98  
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 2.97   | 2.56   | 2.48   | 2.72   | 2.54   | 2.21   | 3.13   | 3.04   | 2.33   | 2.70  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 4.61   | 5.55   | 4.07   | 5.78   | 6.56   | 8.56   | 7.67   | 7.22   | 9.58   | 5.96  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 5.43   | 5.67   | 3.48   | 4.12   | 4.90   | 3.32   | 3.65   | 4.02   | 4.00   | 3.59  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2.75   | 3.95   | 5.62   | NA     |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/28/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 7/31/2024
Exhibit 23.3


Filed via EDGAR

30 March 2007



United States Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC")
Corriente Resources Inc. ("Corriente")

Re: Corriente Resources Inc. - Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2006
                               (the "Form 40-F")


Dear Sirs/Mesdames:

Reference is made to the metallurgical studies managed by AMEC Americas Limited,
for which test work was carried out by SGS Lakefield Research Ltd., the results
of which were announced in August 2004.

We hereby consent to the inclusion of our name and above-noted reference in the
Form 40-F referenced herein, to be filed with the SEC.

Yours truly,
AMEC Americas Limited



/s/ Steve Toevs
----------------------------
Steve Toevs
Vice President, Finance
Natural Resources / Oil Sands & Mining

AMEC E&C Services Limited
111 Dunsmuir Street, Suite 400
Vancouver, British Columbia
Canada V6B 5W3

Tel   +1 604-664-4315
Fax   +1 604-669-9516