alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 7041** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. MARCUS ROBERT WILLIAMS , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh
. Louise W. Flanagan , District Judge. ( 5:07

- cr - 00259

- FL

- 2; 5:10

- cv - 00362

- FL )

Submitted : August 16, 2012 Decided: August 21, 2012

Before KING and THACKER , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Marcus Robert Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Gordon James, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Marcus Robert Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2012) motion and the district court’s order denying an extension of time to note an appeal
. We dismiss the appea l for lack of jurisdiction. When the United States or its officer or agency is a party, a notice of appeal must be filed no more than sixty days after the entry of a district court’s final judgment or order, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell , 551 U.S. 205, 214 ( 2007). The district court’s order on Williams’s § 2255 motion was entered on March 29, 2011
. Williams’s motion for an extension of time was filed on August 2, 2011. * The district
court ’s order den ying the motion was entered on August 18, 2011. William s filed a notice of appeal from that order on June 8, 2012. Because Williams failed to file a timely notice of appeal

* This is the postmark date on the envelope in which the motion was mailed to the district court. See Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988) (holding that a prisoner’s notice of appeal is deemed filed on the date he delivers it to prison authorities for mailing to the court).3 from either order and failed to obtain an extension or reopening of either appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 77 (Wednesday, April 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19907-19908]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10627]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. TM98-7-23-001]


Eastern Shore Natural Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

April 16, 1998.
    Take notice that on April 14, 1998, Eastern Shore Natural Gas 
Company (ESNG) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
First Revised Volume No. 1, certain revised tariff sheets in the above 
captioned docket, bear a proposed effective date of April 1, 1998.
    As directed by the March 31, 1998, Commission Order in Docket No. 
TM98-7-23-000, et al. ESNG is refiling its Storage Tracker rates, 
previously filed on March 10, 1998. The purpose of the filing is to 
make a specific correction as directed by the Commission, in the SST 
Overrun Charge shown on Sheet No. 7 to exclude the ACA and GRI 
surcharges from the rate.
    ESNG states that copies of the filing have been served upon its 
jurisdictional customers and interested State Commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and

[[Page 19908]]

Regulations. All such protests must be filed as provided in Section 
154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by 
the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but 
will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies 
of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for 
public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-10627 Filed 4-21-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
**Exhibit 32.3******Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Madison Gas and Electric Company for theperiod ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof("the Report"), I, Gary J. Wolter, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934; and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.**
**RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES  EXHIBIT 12**
**Nine Months Ended Sept. 30, 2001***(In Thousands)***Earnings******Income before interest expense	$29,032Add:Income tax items	11,136Income tax on other income	1,724Income distribution from equity investee	1,000AFUDC - borrowed funds	177Interest on rentals	692Amortization of debt discount	264	Total earnings before interest and taxes	$44,025**Fixed Charges******Interest on long-term debt	$  9,708Amortization of debt discount	264Other interest	858Interest on rentals*	692	Total fixed charges	$11,522**Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges**3.82x*Represents one-third of the total rental expense.
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 619 

Expressing the sense of the Senate that the Senate of each new Congress 

is not bound by the Rules of previous Senates. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 14, 2010 

Mr. UDALL of New Mexico submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the Senate that the Senate of each 

new Congress is not bound by the Rules of previous Senates. 

Whereas section 5 of article I of the United States Constitution states ‘‘Each House may determine the Rules of its 

Proceedings’’, with no requirement for a supermajority to 

adopt or amend the rules of either House; 

Whereas it is a longstanding common law principle, upheld 

in Supreme Court decisions such as United States v. 

Ballin, that one legislature cannot bind subsequent legislatures; 

Whereas advisory rulings by Vice Presidents Nixon, Humphrey, and Rockefeller, sitting as the President of the 

Senate, have stated that a Senate at the beginning of a 

Congress is not bound by the cloture requirement imposed by a previous Senate and may end debate on a proVerDate Mar 15 2010 23:45 Sep 14, 2010 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\SR619.IS SR619

smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 619 IS 

posal to adopt or amend the Standing Rules of the Senate by a majority vote; and 

Whereas the provision in rule XXII that requires a two-thirds 

vote of Senators present and voting to limit debate on a 

measure or motion to amend the Senate Rules is unconstitutional because its effect is to deny a majority of the 

Senate of each new Congress from proceeding to a vote 

to determine its own rules: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate of each new Congress is 

2 not bound by the rules of previous Senates and should, 

3 upon a motion by a Senator to bring debate to a close, 

4 if said motion receives the affirmative vote of a majority 

5 of the Senators duly chosen and sworn, proceed to deter6 mine the Rules of its Proceedings in accordance with sec7 tion 5 of article I of the Constitution. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
No. 12-5990.

#### Wallace *v.*Roberts, Warden.

Super. Ct. Washington County, Ga. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Tank Sports, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-KSB for the period ended February 28, 2007, as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jing Jing Long, in
      my
      capacity as Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18
      U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that:





The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
      June 13, 2007




/s/
      Jing Jing Long


Jing
      Jing
      Long


Principal
      Accounting Officer
Exhibit 32.2

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Magellan
Petroleum Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Antoine J. Lafargue, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
of the Company.



|                   |  |     |  |                                      
|------------------ |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: May 16, 2011 |  | By: |  | /s/ Antoine J. Lafargue              
|                   |  |     |  | Antoine J. Lafargue                  
|                   |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer



39
|                                                                                 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                   
|View History:                                                                    
|                                                                                 
|U.S. Natural Gas Salt Underground Storage Activity-Injects   (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                 
|                                                                                 
|U.S. Natural Gas Salt Underground Storage Activity-Injects   (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         | 142,243 | 194,185 | 258,468 | 267,309 | 296,968 | 259,652
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 295,916 | 341,084 | 358,397 | 356,964 | 340,537 | 378,485 | 370,756 | 400,244 | 440,262 | 459,330
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 510,691 | 532,893 | 465,005 | 492,143 | 634,045 | 606,473 | 592,740 | 701,312 | 811,423 | 838,865
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 714,622 | 804,046 | 806,259 | 812,156 |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
-

. . 

# TmzArrcO~~lrcu GENERAL OF TExaS
March 18, 1957

‘* Honorible-R;“,$4i’Dkon; ‘Cbitrnian Opinton No; WW-66 Board of ~~Wiit#ti~~ag~laeers lrlo:ta&&y&*~&ti’: :,:_ R& Doer ‘the,Board of **Wmtur** Austin, Tena Eagiaecrs ‘imvefuli power to dclega$c rcaponatbflfty

. !~ 8ad ‘miithority to 

### other fll-

..~ **‘ dt+idtili**  **ata iti**  **own** 8tahtory atiuet~re~ except Daar Mr:DLxori: ‘~,. aa l pcifically lttiited by statute 0 ‘.. 1, .,w&lf to ~0th l&t&~ of March .I:,:1957,~:~~l;(ch~~e .qoote in partxs followa:Honorable 7%. M. Dixon, Page 2 (WW-66)
**A** corollary to this general rule Ls that ministerial acts may be delegated to 

### others by a body, but 

### acts kvolving offtctal 

### discretion ,, must be performed by tbe body dqsignakd by law.

The Board 

### of Water Engineers, subject to the restriction that no legislative 

### or discretionary powers be delegated, can prescribe such rules, rcgulsttoua and procedures as are 

### necessary to carry out the duties imposed @on it by law.’ Ar.ticle 1531, V.C.S., Margolin v. State, 205 S.W.2d 775 (Tex,Crim.App. 1947); Trapp v. Shell Oil Company, 145 Tex. 323, 198 S.W.2d 424, 428 (1946).

Y&r attention is direckd to the fact that Subdivision 4 ofArticle 7477 allows tl+kBoard to delegate & Yadministrativ6a dutka to the Chief Eng&ear; ,,‘. ,‘.

‘. The distinction between *administrative” or ‘minkkrial* acts and *judicial* acts ia set forth in Boyntoa v. Brown, 164’S.W. 893, Civ.App., Reh. den. (19,l4), which quotes from the case of Commissioner v. Smith, 5 Tax. 479:,uThe distinction between ministerial and.j.udicial or othar off$oiar’a&, seems to be **that** where the’kw prescribes and defines .the duty to be performed with puch prectsiun **aad** cerkinty as to ,+avi nothing to the 8%ercisc .ofdiscretion or 

### judgmentthe act is ministerial; but where the act to be done involves the exercise 

### of discretion.or judgment in determining whether the duty exi&a, it is **n&t**to be deemed merely ministerial.”

,, The Board 

### can promulgak rules or regulationa pertaining to the general, management of its business which wiJ1place only ‘miniakrial” duti?s upon **the peraon**  entrusted with the performance of 6UCh ministerial or administrative **&ties** and avord the necessity of meeting each time business **of** the Board is to be adminktered. * SUMMARY



### The Board of Water Engineers can formulate certain rules 

### and rigulationa and delegak the adminktratton of such rules and regulations to an individual forI-“.. I

.

. -, Honorable R. M. Dixon, Page 3 (WW-66) administration, thereby removing 

### the need for the Board to.hold an executive meatlag each time action deal&g with the direction of the administration of the office of the’Board is required, so long as such rulea and regulationa are so formulated as to leave. no discretioaary power. Very truly your~s., WILL WILSON Attorney.Genaral

HB:tiw APPROVED: 

### BYHoughton Brownlee. Jr.. Assistants-.. >.-,. OPINION COMMITTEE H. Grady’Chandler, **Chairman**
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 77 (Wednesday, April 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 19911]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10613]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Project No. 2232-342]


Duke Energy Corporation; Notice of Availability of Environmental 
Assessment

April 16, 1998.
    A environmental assessment (EA) is available for public review. The 
EA was prepared for an application filed by the Duke Energy 
Corporation, licensee for the Catawba-Wateree Hydroelectric Project. In 
its application, the licensee requests permission to grant an easement 
to Ipswitch Bay, LLC to construct a private residential marina 
consisting of five docks on Lake Norman near Mooresville in Iredell 
County, North Carolina. The proposal also involves dredging a 60,000 
square foot area of the lake (amounting to 8,500 cubic yards of 
sediment).
    Based on the environmental analyses presented in the EA, the 
Commission's staff has recommended allowing Duke Energy Corporation to 
grant the proposed easement for non-project use of project land. The EA 
finds that the proposed action would not constitute a major federal 
action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment.
    The EA was written by staff in the Office of Hydropower Licensing, 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Copies of the EA can be obtained 
by calling the Commission's public reference room at (202) 208-1371.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-10613 Filed 4-21-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
|                                                                      
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                        
|View History:                                                         
|                                                                      
|West Virginia Natural Gas Industrial Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                      
|                                                                      
|West Virginia Natural Gas Industrial Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 57,380 | 49,807 | 44,857
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 47,598 | 39,598 | 45,492 | 41,325 | 41,308 | 33,263 | 32,274 | 35,302 | 29,777 | 24,432
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 26,023 | 25,443 | 26,926 | 26,780 | 27,796 | 25,474 | 32,281 | 38,358 | 37,374 | 36,570
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 34,950 | 38,009 | 37,198 | NA     |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
|   | 1. | The Annual Report on Form      10-KSB/A (the “Annual Report”) of the Company for the year ended August 3,      2008, which this certification accompanies (the "Annual Report"), fully      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange      Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the      Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial      condition and results of operations of the  Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| August      3, 2009 | By:    | /s/       John      Antonio |   |
|---------------------|--------|----------------------------------|--------|
|                |   | John Antonio                |
|                |   | Chief Executive Officer     |

----
No. 12-5952.

#### Woldegiorgise *v.*Holder, Attorney General.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 75 (Monday, April 20, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 19508]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10261]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs


Indian Gaming

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Approved Amendment to Tribal-State Compact.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 11 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 
1988, Pub. L. 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2710, the Secretary of the Interior 
shall publish, in the Federal Register, notice of approved amendments 
to Tribal-State Compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class III 
(casino) gaming on Indian reservations. The Assistant Secretary--Indian 
Affairs, Department of the Interior, through his delegated authority, 
has approved the Amendments to the Lac Courte Oreilles Band of Lake 
Superior Chippewa Indians and the State of Wisconsin Gaming Compact of 
1991, which was executed on February 13, 1998.

DATES: This action is effective April 20, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy J. Pierskalla, Acting Director, 
Indian Gaming Management Staff, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Washington, 
D.C. 20240, (202) 219-4068.

    Dated: April 9, 1998.
Kevin Gover,
Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 98-10261 Filed 4-17-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-02-P