alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32(a)**

**Certification of CEO Pursuant to**

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

This certification is provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and accompanies the annual report on Form 10-K (the “Form 10-K”) for the year ended December 31, 2006 of Wendy’s International, Inc. (the “Issuer”).

I, Paul D. House, the Chief Executive Officer of Issuer certify that, to the best of my knowledge: 

(i) the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.78m(a) or 78o(d)); and 

(ii) the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Issuer. 

Dated: March 9, 2007 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Tim HortonsInc. and will be retained by Tim Hortons Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>
                                                          Exhibit 99.2

                      Statement of Chief Financial Officer
         Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned,
Arthur Hicks, the Chief Financial Officer of Cybex International, Inc. (the
"Company"), hereby certifies that:

     The Company's Form 10-Q Quarterly Report for the period ended June 29, 2002
     (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: August 13, 2002                          /s/ Arthur W. Hicks
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Arthur W. Hicks
                                                Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
registrant's Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 1996 and is 
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statement.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          822810
<SECURITIES>                                    908835
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1940999
<ALLOWANCES>                                    301000
<INVENTORY>                                     777908
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4331766
<PP&E>                                          999770
<DEPRECIATION>                                  637000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4859996
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           957469
<BONDS>                                         824483
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0000
<PREFERRED>                                       0000
<COMMON>                                        236520
<OTHER-SE>                                     2841524
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4859996
<SALES>                                        7722930
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               7722930
<CGS>                                          3712226
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3712226
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2727700
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               64193
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1258092
<INCOME-TAX>                                    456093
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             812649
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0000
<CHANGES>                                         0000
<NET-INCOME>                                    812649
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .29
        

</TABLE>
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 567 

To elect Daniel K. Inouye, a Senator from the State of Hawaii, to be 

President pro tempore of the Senate of the United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 28, 2010 

Mr. REID (for himself and Mr. MCCONNELL) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

To elect Daniel K. Inouye, a Senator from the State of 

Hawaii, to be President pro tempore of the Senate of 

the United States. 

1 Resolved, That Daniel K. Inouye, a Senator from the 

2 State of Hawaii, be, and he is hereby, elected President 

3 of the Senate pro tempore. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
#### COM. v. FELTS, R.

2127 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/14/2017

CP-51-CR-0901423-2001

(Philadelphia)

Affirmed
# Table 10.9

# RSE 10.9

# Microsoft_Word_Document1.docx

# image1.emf

# Microsoft_Word_Document2.docx

# image2.emf
|                                                                        
|------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                          
|View History:                                                           
|                                                                        
|Oklahoma Natural Gas Industrial Price  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                        
|                                                                        
|Oklahoma Natural Gas Industrial Price  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 4.16   | 3.65   | 3.51  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 5.24   | 8.07   | 6.28   | 7.45   | 8.59   | 9.41   | 9.66   | 9.18   | 13.03  | 12.53 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 8.23   | 7.37   | 7.65   | 7.16   | 8.30   | 7.51   | 2.94   | 3.30   | 2.67   | 2.50  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2.29   | 4.52   | 7.38   | 3.17   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
|                                                                               
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                 
|View History:                                                                  
|                                                                               
|No chart available.                                                            
|No chart available.                                                            
|                                                                               
|                                                                               
|Hawaii Natural Gas Deliveries to Electric Power Consumers  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                               

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | --     | 0      | --     | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     | --     | --     | --     | --     | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTIONS 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Public Company Accounting Reform
and Investor Protection Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted Tom Blakeley, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Paul Bowman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the Periodic Report ), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Annual
Report and results of operations of the Company for the periods covered by the Annual Report.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |                        
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|/s/ Thomas Blakeley     |  |  |  | /s/ Paul Bowman        
|Thomas Blakeley         |  |  |  | Paul Bowman            
|Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
|Date: March 27, 2007    |  |  |  | Date: March 27, 2007
EXHIBIT
      99.1











**Report
      of Independent Accountants**






To
      the
      Board of Directors and


Shareholder
      of Equity One, Inc.:







We
      have
      examined management’s assertion about Equity One, Inc. and its subsidiaries’
(the “Company”) compliance with the minimum servicing standards identified in
      the Mortgage Bankers Association of America’s Uniform Single Attestation Program
      for Mortgage Bankers (“USAP”) as of and for the year ended November 30, 2005
      included in the accompanying management assertion (see Exhibit I). Management
      is
      responsible for the Company’s compliance with those minimum servicing standards.
      Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the
      Company’s compliance based on our examination.




Our
      examination was made in accordance with attestation standards established by
      the
      American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included
      examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the
      minimum servicing standards and performing such other procedures as we
      considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination
      provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide
      a
      legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the minimum servicing
      standards.




In
      our
      opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the
      aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended November
      30, 2005 is fairly stated, in all material respects.




/s/
      PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP





February
      27, 2006
















**Management’s
      Assertion Concerning Compliance**


**with
      USAP Minimum Servicing Standards**









February
      22, 2006






As
      of and
      for the year ended November 30, 2005, Equity One, Inc. and its subsidiaries
      (the “Company”),
      a wholly-owned subsidiary of Popular Financial Holdings, Inc., have complied
      in all
      material respects with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage
      Bankers Association
      of America’s *Uniform
      Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers* (“USAP”) solely
      for purpose of servicing the residential mortgage loans underlying the Loan
      Asset Backed Certificate
      Series 1997-1, 1998-1, 1999-1, 2000-1, 2001-1, 2001-2, 2001-3, 2002-1, 2002-2, 2002-3,
      2002-4, 2002-5, 2003-1, 2003-2, 2003-3, 2003-4, 2004-1, 2004-2, 2004-3, 2004-4,
      2004-- 5,
      2005-1, 2005-2, 2005-A, 2005-3, 2005-B, 2005-4, 2005-C, 2005-5, 2005-D (the “Agreement”)
      except as noted as
      follows:




As
      of and
      for this same period, the Company had in effect fidelity bond and errors and
      omissions policies
      in the amounts of $65,000,000 and $25,000,000, respectively.







/s/
      John
      N. Martella





John
      N.
      Martella


Group
      Executive Vice President of Loan Servicing
Infrared Spectrum Lot Number SANITIZED
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATE      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF      2002 **

| 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  /s/                Alan                Tannenbaum  |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|
| Alan                Tannenbaum                                |
| Chairman, Chief Executive Officer              |
|                                                          |
| /s/                Daniel                Bartley         |
| Daniel                Bartley                                 |
| Chief                Financial Officer                        |

----
#### COM. v. TREADWAY, P.

1361 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/03/2017

CP-15-CR-0001794-2010 (Chester)

Affirmed
----

Exhibit 23.3

Consent of John Hoffert 

Reference is made to the: 

Panantza & San Carlos Project PreliminaryAssessment Report, dated October 30, 2007 and titled "PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENTREPORT, PANANTZA & SAN CARLOS COPPER PROJECT, Morona – Santiago, Ecuador"; and

Mirador Project Feasibility Study Report,dated April 23, 2008 and titled "MIRADOR COPPER-GOLD PROJECT, 30,000 TPDFEASIBILITY STUDY, Zamora-Chinchipe Province Ecuador" 

(collectively, the "Technical Reports"). 

The undersigned hereby consents to referencesto its name and references to and excerpts from the Technical Reports in theAnnual Report on Form 40-F of Corriente Resources Inc. to be filed with theUnited States Securities and Exchange Commission for the company’s 2008 FiscalYear. 

Dated this 23rd day of March 2009.

/S/ John Hoffert                           John Hoffert, P.Eng****

----
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 75 (Monday, April 20, 1998)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 19406]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10306]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 100

[CGD 05-98-020]


Special Local Regulations for Marine Events; Approaches to 
Annapolis Harbor, Spa Creek, and Severn River, Annapolis, MD

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of implementation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice implements the special local regulations for the 
Blue Angels Airshow, to be held May 19 and 22, 1998, over Spa Creek and 
the Severn River, near the U.S. Naval Academy, Annapolis, Maryland. 
These special local regulations are necessary to control vessel traffic 
in the vicinity of the U.S. Naval Academy due to the confined nature of 
the waterway and expected vessel congestion during the airshow. The 
effect will be to restrict general navigation in the regulated area for 
the safety of spectators and vessels transiting the event area.

DATES: The regulation implemented by this notice is effective from 
11:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. on May 19, 1998 and from 11:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. 
on May 20, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Chief Warrant Officer R. L. Houck, Marine Events Coordinator, 
Commander, Coast Guard Activities Baltimore, 2401 Hawkins Point Road, 
Baltimore, MD 21226-1971, (410) 576-2674.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The U.S. Naval Academy will sponsor the Blue 
Angels Airshow over the Severn River near the U.S. Naval Academy, 
Annapolis, Maryland. The event will consist of 6 high performance jet 
aircraft flying at low altitudes in formation over the Severn River. 
Therefore, to ensure the safety of spectators and transiting vessels, 
33 CFR 100.511 will be in effect for the duration of the event. Under 
provisions of 33 CFR 100.511, a vessel may not enter the regulated area 
unless it receives permission from the Coast Guard Patrol Commander. 
Spectator vessels may anchor outside the regulated area but may not 
block a navigable channel. Because these restrictions will be in effect 
for a limited period, they should not result in a significant 
disruption of maritime traffic.

    Dated: March 25, 1998.
Roger T. Rufe, Jr.,
Vice Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 98-10306 Filed 4-17-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-M
#### State v. Collier

109,529

08/20/2015

Denied.

Unpublished
#### State v. Klein

107,102

08/19/13

Denied. .

Unpublished
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 0 2

- 10

- 00 348

- CR

BRANDON LEE NIX APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

------------

FROM COUNTY CRIMINAL COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF DENTON COUNTY

------------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

------------

On May 5, 2010

, after finding that Appellant Brandon Lee Nix violated t he

terms and conditions of his community supervision, the trial court adjudicated Nix

guilty of, and sentenced him to 120 days’ confinement for, misdemeanor theft of

property with a value of $50 or more but less than $500. See Tex. Penal Code

Ann. § 31.03 (e) (2)(A)(i) (Vernon 2003).

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

Nix’s motion for new trial was due June 4, 2010, but it was not filed until

June 7, 2010. See Tex. R. App. P. 21.4(a). Therefore, his notice of a ppeal was

also due June 4, 2010. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2( a ). On August 20, 2010, Nix

filed his notice of appeal with a motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal. 2

On September 9, 2010, we notified Nix’s counsel of the apparent

untimeliness of the appeal; requested that he advise whether the motion for new

trial was properly addressed, stamped, and mailed by the United States Postal

Service to the proper trial court clerk on or before June 4, 2010; stated that any

response must be filed on or before September 20, 2010; and stated that the

appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction if the court determined that the

appeal was not timely p erfected. See Tex. R. App. P. 9.2(b)(1), (2). 3 We have

received no response.

A notice of appeal that complies with the requirements of rule 26 is

essential to vest this court with jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1)

(providing that notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days of sentencing).

The c ourt of c riminal a ppeals has expressly held that, without a timely filed notice

2 We denied Nix’s motion to extend time to file his notice of appeal on September 27, 2010, because without a showing that the motion for new trial was timely filed, the motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal was also untimely. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3.

3 Under rule of appellate procedure 9.2(b), a notice of appeal is timely only if it was deposited with the United States Postal Service on or before the last day for filing and received by the trial court within ten days after the filing deadline. Tex. R. App. P. 9.2(b)(1). Our September 9, 2010 letter also listed the items that we would accept as evidence of proof of mailing.3

of appeal or motion for extension of time, we cannot exercise jurisdiction over an

appeal. Olivo v. State , 918 S.W .2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Because

there has been no showing that Nix’s motion for new trial was timely filed , his

n otice of appeal was correspondingly untimely. Therefore, w e dismiss the

appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43 .2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MCCOY

, MEIER and GABRIEL

, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: October 14, 2010