alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-20696

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DANIS HUMBERTO VELASQUEZ-MONTOYA, also known as Danis Humberto

Velasquez, also known as Danis Humberto Valesquez-Montoya, also known as

Danis Humberto Velasquez Montoya, also known as Daniz Humberto Velasquez,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:12-CR-204-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Danis Humberto

Velasquez-Montoya has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v.

Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Velasquez-Montoya has not filed a

response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 20, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 12-20696 Document: 00512347330 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/20/2013
No. 12-20696

record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 12-20696 Document: 00512347330 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/20/2013
-81 -80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75

38 39 40 41



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 08/04 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 04 Aug 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.92 N 77.01 WMeters AGL
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF UPWARD TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION AS OF AND FOR THE NINE
MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           5,800
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  185,500
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               192,227
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 192,227
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,200
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       162,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,027
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   192,227
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,690
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                23,252
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (15,562)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (15,562)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (15,562)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
No. 12-6335.

#### Young *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
#### ESTATE OF: George H. SCHNELLER, Deceased

1981 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/12/2017

Reargument Denied 9/6/2017

File No. 1501-1759 (Chester)

Appeal Dismissed
#### State v. Scott

110,091

09/23/2015

Denied

Unpublished
318P16-2

#### In the Matter of the Foreclosure of a Deed of Trust Executed by Donald R. Bagwell and Sylvia J. Bagwell Dated February 26, 2003 and Recorded in Book 2910 at Page 533 in the Orange County Public Registry, North Carolina, et al.

1. Petitioner’s *Pro Se*Motion for Writ of Prohibition and/or Temporary Restraining Order

2. Petitioner’s *Pro Se*Petition for *Writ of Mandamus*

1. Dismissed 09/08/2016

2. Dismissed 09/08/2016
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-4626

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ERIK G. TYLER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.

(CR-00-121-AW)

Submitted: December 20, 2000 Decided: January 8, 2001

Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Wyda, Federal Public Defender, Beth M. Farber, Assistant

Federal Public Defender, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Lynne

A. Battaglia, United States Attorney, Steven M. Dettelbach, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Eric G. Tyler appeals his conviction for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1)

(West Supp. 2000). We affirm.

Tyler contends that the district court erred by excluding

photographic evidence presented by defense counsel. “[D]ecisions

regarding the admission and exclusion of evidence are peculiarly

within the province of the district court, not to be reversed on

appeal absent an abuse of discretion.” United States v. Ellis, 121

F.3d 908, 926 (4th Cir. 1997) (citation omitted).

We have reviewed the record and briefs and find that the district court did not abuse its discretion by excluding the photograph. Accordingly, we affirm Tyler’s conviction. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
382P15-2

#### State v. Richard Jackson Hall

Def’s *Pro Se*Motion for Petition for Rehearing of Denial of Petition for *Writ of Cei'tiorari*

Denied
# C_2019170EN.01000101.xml

| 17.5.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 170/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.5.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 170/1

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty)

(2019/C 170/01)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 01.04.2019 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.53258 (2019/N) |
| Member State | Austria |
| Region | PINZGAU-PONGAU, SALZBURG UND UMGEBUNG, SALZBURG, LUNGAU | — |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Gewährung von freiwilligen Entschädigungsleistungen und die Förderung von Maßnahmen zur Minderung oder Vermeidung von durch den Wolf verursachten wirtschaftlichen Belastungen im Land Salzburg |
| Legal basis | § 18 lit. a Salzburger Landwirtschaftsförderungsgesetz 1975, LGBl. Nr. 16/1975 idgF. iVm der gegenständlichen Richtlinie |
| Type of measure | Scheme | — |
| Objective | Aid to compensate for the damage caused by protected animals, Aid for investment in tangible assets and intangible assets on agricultural holdings linked to primary agricultural production |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | Overall budget: EUR 0.2 (in millions) |
| Intensity | 100  % |
| Duration (period) | until 31.12.2020 |
| Economic sectors | Animal production |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Land Salzburg — Abteilung 4: Lebensgrundlagen und Energie
  Fanny-von-Lehnertstraße 1, 5020 Salzburg |
| Other information | — |

Date of adoption of the decision

01.04.2019

Aid number

SA.53258 (2019/N)

Member State

Austria

Region

PINZGAU-PONGAU, SALZBURG UND UMGEBUNG, SALZBURG, LUNGAU

—

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Gewährung von freiwilligen Entschädigungsleistungen und die Förderung von Maßnahmen zur Minderung oder Vermeidung von durch den Wolf verursachten wirtschaftlichen Belastungen im Land Salzburg

Legal basis

§ 18 lit. a Salzburger Landwirtschaftsförderungsgesetz 1975, LGBl. Nr. 16/1975 idgF. iVm der gegenständlichen Richtlinie

Type of measure

Scheme

—

Objective

Aid to compensate for the damage caused by protected animals, Aid for investment in tangible assets and intangible assets on agricultural holdings linked to primary agricultural production

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Overall budget: EUR 0.2 (in millions)

Intensity

100  %

Duration (period)

until 31.12.2020

Economic sectors

Animal production

Name and address of the granting authority

Land Salzburg — Abteilung 4: Lebensgrundlagen und Energie

Fanny-von-Lehnertstraße 1, 5020 Salzburg

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm.

---
# C_2019318EN.01000202.xml

| 23.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 318/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 318/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9457 — Next Alt/Sotheby’s)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 318/04)

On 27 August 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9457. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9457. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Alliance Holdings GP, L.P. (the
Partnership) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph W. Craft III, President and Chief Executive Officer of
Alliance GP, LLC, the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                          |  |                        
|--------------------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|By:                                                       |  | /s/ Joseph W. Craft III
|Joseph W. Craft III                                      
|President and Chief Executive Officer of Alliance GP, LLC
|(the general partner of Alliance Holdings GP, L.P.)      

Date: March 3, 2010

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate document. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Judith Caperton * From the 350th District Court

 Taylor County,

Trial Court No. 10011-D.

Vs. No. 11-15-00021-CV * March 12, 2015

Serenity Foundation of Texas d/b/a * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

Serenity House, Monica Montez, and (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Brian Hudspeth, Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

 This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the 

appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Therefore, in accordance 

with this court’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed.
# C_2019241EN.01000601.xml

| 17.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 241/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 241/6

---

Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)

(Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (1)
  )

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 241/06)

Decisions granting an authorisation

| Reference of the decision (2) | Date of decision | Substance name | Holder of the authorisation | Authorisation numbers | Authorised uses | Date of expiry of review period | Reasons for the decision |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| C(2019) 5023 | 10 July 2019 | pentazinc chromate octahydroxide (EC No 256-418-0; CAS No 49663-84-5) | Indestructible Paint Ltd, 16-25 Pentos Drive, B11 3TA, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom | REACH/19/26/0 | Formulation of mixtures. | 22 January 2031 | In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socioeconomic benefits outweigh the risk to human health arising from the use of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies. |
| REACH/19/26/1 | Use in stoved epoxy primer for corrosion protection of aircraft engine components in aerospace and aeroderivative applications. | 22 January 2031 |

Reference of the decision (2)

Date of decision

Substance name

Holder of the authorisation

Authorisation numbers

Authorised uses

Date of expiry of review period

Reasons for the decision

C(2019) 5023

10 July 2019

pentazinc chromate octahydroxide (EC No 256-418-0; CAS No 49663-84-5)

Indestructible Paint Ltd, 16-25 Pentos Drive, B11 3TA, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom

REACH/19/26/0

Formulation of mixtures.

22 January 2031

In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socioeconomic benefits outweigh the risk to human health arising from the use of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies.

REACH/19/26/1

Use in stoved epoxy primer for corrosion protection of aircraft engine components in aerospace and aeroderivative applications.

22 January 2031

---

(1)  OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1.

(2)  The decision is available on the European Commission website at: http://ec.europa.eu/growth/sectors/chemicals/reach/about/index_en.htm

---
Exhibit 32.1


               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Micronetics, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), David Robbins, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
result of operations of the Company.




January 28, 2004           /s/David Robbins
                           ---------------------
                           Name: David Robbins
                           Title: Chief Executive Officer
                          (Principal Executive Officer)



This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### State v. Sanderford

111,249

09/14/2015

Denied

Unpublished
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Lawson Software, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period
ended May 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Harry Debes, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



/s/ HARRY DEBES Harry Debes President, Chief Executive Officer, and DirectorJuly 9, 2009


---
Exhibit 10.1

                           PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA

                                  LAND LICENSE




PEOPLE'S  REPUBLIC  OF  CHINA
LAND  RESOURCE  BUREAU                    /LAND  LICENSE  SEAL/


                                        1
<PAGE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>




<S>                                      <C>

User                                     Changzhou Broadway Business Development Co., Ltd
---------------------------------------  ------------------------------------------------
Location                                 East to Huangshan Road, South to Zhunan Road,
                                         Xinbei District, Changzhou City, G20-11-1-3
---------------------------------------  ------------------------------------------------
Purpose                                  Residence
---------------------------------------  ------------------------------------------------
Area                                                                           75596.97m2
---------------------------------------  ------------------------------------------------
Commencement                                                                     2000/9/4
---------------------------------------  ------------------------------------------------
Termination Date                                                                 2070/9/4
---------------------------------------  ------------------------------------------------


                                         /seal/ Changzhou Land Resource Bureau
                                         ------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

                                        2
<PAGE>

Conditions:

1.   Institutions  or individuals use of the state owned land shall be according
     to  the  Chinese  Law.

2.   From  (Land  Management  Law  P.R.  China)  item  11:

     -     Ownership  and  use  of  land  is  only be permitted when it has been
           registered  and  approved  and  the  license  obtained

3.   From  (Real  Estate  Management  Law  P.R.  China)  item  59:

     -     If  the  purpose  of  the land lease has changed according to Chinese
           Law,  a new  license  must  be  obtained

4.   From  (Land  Management  Law  P.R.  China)  item  12:

     -     The  registered  right  and  ownership  of  the  land is protected by
           Chinese Law

5.   From  (Land  Management  Law  P.R.  China)  item  17

 -    According to the rules of Land Management Law P.R. China and the Real
      Estate  Management  Law  P.R.  China,  once  registration  is  approved,
      a license  will  be  given


                         /Changzhou  Government  Seal/

                                        3
<PAGE>