alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

JUNE 23, 2006

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 05-15368

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 04-00185-CV-OC-10-GRJ

ROBERTS ENTERPRISES, INC., 

a Florida corporation, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

versus 

OLYMPIA SALES, INC., 

Defendant-Appellant. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

_________________________

(June 23, 2006)

Before DUBINA, HULL and COX, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
2

Defendant Olympia Sales, Inc. (“Olympia”) appeals the district court’s

judgment of voluntarily dismissal of Plaintiff Roberts Enterprises, Inc.’s (“Roberts”)

lawsuit against Olympia without prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2).

Olympia contends that the district court abused its discretion in dismissing the

complaint without prejudice because Roberts delayed in moving for dismissal,

Olympia had incurred significant legal expenses in defending the case, Olympia had

filed a motion for summary judgment that was pending at the time of the dismissal,

and Olympia was deprived by the dismissal without prejudice of a potential malicious

prosecution claim against Roberts. 

After review of the briefs and the record on appeal, we affirm. The district

court did not abuse its discretion in granting Roberts’s motion for a voluntary

dismissal on the condition that Roberts could not reassert the claims made in this

lawsuit in another case without first paying Olympia $139,121.98 (the costs and

attorneys’ fees Olympia incurred in defense of this lawsuit). See Pontenberg v.

Boston Scientific Corp., 252 F.3d 1253 (11th Cir. 2001).

AFFIRMED.
|                                                                                          
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                            
|View History:                                                                             
|                                                                                          
|Percent of Industrial Natural Gas Deliveries in Nevada Represented by the Price  (Percent)
|                                                                                          
|                                                                                          
|Percent of Industrial Natural Gas Deliveries in Nevada Represented by the Price  (Percent)
|                                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 6.3    | 15.5   | 22.5  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 18.1   | 33.3   | 34.3   | 19.1   | 16.5   | 17.2   | 16.8   | 17.1   | 17.8   | 17.3  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 18.4   | 17.8   | 15.5   | 15.7   | 15.5   | 12.2   | 12.7   | 14.5   | 14.2   | 14.6  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 14.8   | 17.5   | 17.9   | 22.8   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
225P16

#### Charles Anthony Ball v. James M. Ellis, Administrator of Estate

Pit’s *Pro Se*Motion for PDR

Denied 06/30/2016
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           UT

<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                   PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      285,034
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    9,163
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         41,822
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       23,440
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 12,898
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 372,358
<COMMON>                                       29,191
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      59,177
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            42,433
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 130,801
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           110,015
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             45,084
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                      0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                 0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  171
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                      0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                    276
<LEASES-CURRENT>                               1,464
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 84,547
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  372,358
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      103,507
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           7,624
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     79,552
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     87,176
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        16,331
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             431
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 16,762
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       4,321
<NET-INCOME>                                   12,441
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                    0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  12,441
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       5,932
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      4,047
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         42,310
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  1.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.43
        









</TABLE>
#### ROUSH, F. v. ROUSH, F.

1697 WDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/03/2017

2014-01078

(Cambria)

Affirmed
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Mesoblast Limited (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended June 30, 2016 as filed on the date hereof (the “Report”) ”), I, Silviu Itescu, Chief Executive Officer for the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: I, Silviu Itescu, certify that: 

|   | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

| Date: August 24, 2016 |   | By:    | /s/ SILVIU ITESCU  |
|-----------------------|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|                  |   |   | Silviu Itescu           |
|                  |   |   | Chief Executive Officer |
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2019336EN.01000501.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 7.10.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 336/5 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9527 — New Media Investment Group/Gannett Co.)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 336/03)

1.

On 30 September 2019, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2019336EN.01000501-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | New Media Investment Group Inc. (United States of America), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Gannett Co., Inc. (United States of America). |

New Media Investiment Group Inc. acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Gannett Co., Inc.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for New Media Investiment Group Inc.: publishing of local print and online media, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for Gannett Co., Inc.: media and marketing solutions company, including publishing of national and local print and online media. |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2019336EN.01000501-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9527 — New Media Investment Group/Gannett Co.

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2019336EN.01000501-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2019336EN.01000501-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
|                                                                                       
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                       
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                         
|View History: Annual                                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                                   
|View History:                                                                          
|                                                                                       
|Delaware Natural Gas Underground Storage Injections All Operators  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                       
|                                                                                       
|Delaware Natural Gas Underground Storage Injections All Operators  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1960's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 1,274  | 1,500  | 179   
|1970's                                                                                                                            | 391    | 189    |        | 255    |        | 2,012  |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

WILLIAM J. ROHLAND,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 269 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 24th day of October, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
##### 



For the twelve months ended December 31,
 2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2002Pretax income from continuing operations
before Minority Interest
    
    $
    19,363,144
    
    
    $
    47,346,721
    
    
    $
    21,662,697
    
    
    $
    19,012,550
    
    
    $
    18,788,128Add: Fixed ChargesInterest Expense
    
    
    179,527
    
    
    
    190,870
    
    
    
    206,279
    
    
    
    132,969
    
    
    
    90,108Interest component of rent expense
    
    
    352,986
    
    
    
    364,223
    
    
    
    198,597
    
    
    
    165,600
    
    
    
    127,200Amortization of Capitalized Interest
    
    
    8,787,519
    
    
    
    4,781,856
    
    
    
    3,047,801
    
    
    
    2,487,729
    
    
    
    2,402,159Earnings as defined
    
    $
    28,683,176
    
    
    $
    52,683,670
    
    
    $
    25,115,374
    
    
    $
    21,798,848
    
    
    $
    21,407,595Fixed Charges:Interest expense
    
    $
    179,527
    
    
    $
    190,870
    
    
    $
    206,279
    
    
    $
    132,969
    
    
    $
    90,108Interest component of rent expense
    
    
    352,986
    
    
    
    364,223
    
    
    
    198,597
    
    
    
    165,600
    
    
    
    127,200Capitalized Interest
    
    
    19,106,562
    
    
    
    12,485,232
    
    
    
    4,884,680
    
    
    
    2,065,526
    
    
    
    1,999,263Fixed Charges
    
    $
    19,639,075
    
    
    $
    13,040,325
    
    
    $
    5,289,556
    
    
    $
    2,364,095
    
    
    $
    2,216,571Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
    
    
    1.46
    
    
    
    4.04
    
    
    
    4.75
    
    
    
    9.22
    
    
    
    9.66
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 75 (Monday, April 20, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 19493]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10363]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-1212-DR]


Minnesota; Amendment No. 4 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of Minnesota (FEMA-1212-DR), dated April 1, 1998, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 8, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madge Dale, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3260.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster for the State 
of Minnesota is hereby amended to include the following areas among 
those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the 
catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of April 1, 1998:

    The counties of Blue Earth and Nobles for Individual Assistance.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community 
Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis 
Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression 
Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 
83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 
83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)
Lacy E. Suiter,
Executive Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 98-10363 Filed 4-17-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
# C_2019140EN.01001301.xml

| 16.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 140/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 140/13

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9279 — EPH/Uniper France)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 140/09)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Energeticky a Prumyslovy Holding (‘EPH’, Czech Republic), |
| --- | --- |

—

Energeticky a Prumyslovy Holding (‘EPH’, Czech Republic),

| — | Uniper France SAS (‘Uniper France’, France), controlled by Uniper SE. |
| --- | --- |

—

Uniper France SAS (‘Uniper France’, France), controlled by Uniper SE.

EPH acquires, within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation, sole control over the whole of Uniper France.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | EPH is a utility company with several activities including lignite mining, electricity and heat production, distribution and supply as well as gas transmission, distribution, storage and supply, |
| --- | --- |

—

EPH is a utility company with several activities including lignite mining, electricity and heat production, distribution and supply as well as gas transmission, distribution, storage and supply,

| — | Uniper France is active in electricity production from both renewable and non-renewable sources, gas and electricity retail supply and the treatment of ash in France. |
| --- | --- |

—

Uniper France is active in electricity production from both renewable and non-renewable sources, gas and electricity retail supply and the treatment of ash in France.

3.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9279 — EPH/Uniper France

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| --- |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---
Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, John Antonio, certify that:

1.  I  have   reviewed  this  annual  report  on  Form  10-KSB  of  In  Wellstar
International, Inc. for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2006;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining  disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure
controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating to the small business issuer is made known to us
by others,  particularly  during the period in which this annual report is being
prepared;

(b)  evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the small  business  issuer's  disclosure
controls and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business  issuer's internal
control  over  financial  reporting  that  occurred  during  the small  business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business  issuer's  fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual  report) that has  materially  affected,  or is
reasonably  likely to materially  affect,  the small business  issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based  on  our  most  recent  evaluation  of  internal  control  over  financial
reporting,  to the small business  issuer's  auditors and the audit committee of
the small  business  issuer's  board of  directors  (or persons  performing  the
equivalent functions);

(a) all  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in the  design or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely to  adversely  affect  the small  business  issuer's  ability  to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant  role in the small business  issuer's  internal
control over financial reporting.

November 13, 2006




/s/ John Antonio
----------------
John Antonio
President and Chief Executive Officer