52484 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 165 / Thursday, August 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules 

installed in the correct positions and the 

threads of the anchor nuts are in good 

condition. The replacement of the attachment 

hardware is required if any damage on the 

anchor nut threads or a bolt at the wrong 

location is found. 

Actions and Compliance 

(f) Unless already done, do the following 

actions: 

(1) Within 1 month after the effective date 

of this AD, check the airplane maintenance 

records to determine if the left and/or right 

aileron outboard bearing supports have been 

removed at any time during the life of the 

airplane. Do this check following paragraph 

3.A. of Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. PC–7 Service 

Bulletin No. 57–015, Rev. No. 1, date July 23, 

2010. 

(2) If an entry is found during the airplane 

maintenance records check required in 

paragraph (f)(1) of this AD or it is unclear 

whether or not the left and/or right aileron 

outboard bearing supports have been 

removed, perform the actions following the 

instructions in paragraph 3.A.(2) through 

paragraph 3.E of Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. PC–7 

Service Bulletin No. 57–015, Rev. No. 1, date 

July 23, 2010. 

FAA AD Differences 

Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/ 

or service information as follows: No 

differences. 

Other FAA AD Provisions 

(g) The following provisions also apply to 

this AD: 

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs): The Manager, Standards Office, 

FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs 

for this AD, if requested using the procedures 

found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to 

Attn: Doug Rudolph, Aerospace Engineer, 

FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, 

Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106; 

telephone: (816) 329–4059; fax: (816) 329– 

4090. Before using any approved AMOC on 

any airplane to which the AMOC applies, 

notify your appropriate principal inspector 

(PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District 

Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local 

FSDO. 

(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement 

in this AD to obtain corrective actions from 

a manufacturer or other source, use these 

actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective 

actions are considered FAA-approved if they 

are approved by the State of Design Authority 

(or their delegated agent). You are required 

to assure the product is airworthy before it 

is returned to service. 

(3) Reporting Requirements: For any 

reporting requirement in this AD, under the 

provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act 

(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) has 

approved the information collection 

requirements and has assigned OMB Control 

Number 2120–0056. 

Special Flight Permit 

(h) Special flight permits will not be 

issued. 

Related Information 

(i) Refer to MCAI Federal Office of Civil 

Aviation (FOCA) AD HB–2010–010, dated 

July 29, 2010; and Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. PC– 

7 Service Bulletin No. 57–015, Rev. No. 1, 

date July 23, 2010, for related information. 

Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on August 

19, 2010. 

John Colomy, 

Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, 

Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2010–21182 Filed 8–25–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA–2010–0815; Airspace 

Docket No. 10–ANE–107] 

Proposed Removal and Amendment of 

Class E Airspace, Oxford, CT 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM). 

SUMMARY: This action proposes to 

remove Class E surface airspace as an 

extension to Class D airspace, and 

amend Class E airspace extending 

upward from 700 feet at Oxford, CT. 

Decommissioning of the Waterbury 

Non-Directional Beacon (NDB) at the 

Waterbury-Oxford airport has made this 

action necessary for the safety and 

management of Instrument Flight Rules 

(IFR) operations at the airport. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before October 12, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this rule 

to: U.S. Department of Transportation, 

Docket Operations, West Building 

Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 

New Jersey, SE., Washington, DC 

20590–0001; Telephone: 1–800–647– 

5527; Fax: 202–493–2251. You must 

identify the Docket Number FAA–2010– 

0815; Airspace Docket No. 10–ANE– 

107, at the beginning of your comments. 

You may also submit and review 

received comments through the Internet 

at http://www.regulations.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Melinda Giddens, Operations Support 

Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal 

Aviation Administration, P.O. Box 

20636, Atlanta, Georgia 30320; 

telephone (404) 305–5610. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited 

Interested persons are invited to 

comment on this rule by submitting 

such written data, views, or arguments, 

as they may desire. Comments that 

provide the factual basis supporting the 

views and suggestions presented are 

particularly helpful in developing 

reasoned regulatory decisions on the 

proposal. Comments are specifically 

invited on the overall regulatory, 

aeronautical, economic, environmental, 

and energy-related aspects of the 

proposal. 

Communications should identify both 

docket numbers (FAA Docket No. FAA– 

2010–0815; Airspace Docket No. 

10–ANE–107) and be submitted in 

triplicate to the Docket Management 

System (see ADDRESSES section for 

address and phone number). You may 

also submit comments through the 

Internet at 

http://www.regulations.gov. 

Comments wishing the FAA to 

acknowledge receipt of their comments 

on this action must submit with those 

comments a self-addressed stamped 

postcard on which the following 

statement is made: ‘‘Comments to 

Docket No. FAA–2010–0815; Airspace 

Docket No. 10–ANE–107.’’ The postcard 

will be date/time stamped and returned 

to the commenter. 

All communications received before 

the specified closing date for comments 

will be considered before taking action 

on the proposed rule. The proposal 

contained in this notice may be changed 

in light of the comments received. A 

report summarizing each substantive 

public contact with FAA personnel 

concerned with this rulemaking will be 

filed in the docket. 

Availability of NPRMs 

An electronic copy of this document 

may be downloaded from and 

comments submitted through http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Recently 

published rulemaking documents can 

also be accessed through the FAA’s web 

page at http://www.faa.gov/ 

airports_airtraffic/air_traffic/ 

publications/airspace_amendments/. 

You may review the public docket 

containing the proposal, any comments 

received, and any final disposition in 

person in the Dockets Office (see the 

ADDRESSES section for address and 

phone number) between 9 a.m. and 

5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except 

Federal Holidays. An informal docket 

may also be examined during normal 

business hours at the office of the 

Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation 

Administration, Room 210, 1701 

Columbia Avenue, College Park, Georgia 

30337. 

Persons interested in being placed on 

a mailing list for future NPRM’s should 

contact the FAA’s Office of Rulemaking, 


erowe on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 165 / Thursday, August 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules 52485 

(202) 267–9677, to request a copy of 

Advisory circular No. 11–2A, Notice of 

Proposed Rulemaking distribution 

System, which describes the application 

procedure. 

The Proposal 

The FAA is considering an 

amendment to Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 to remove 

Class E surface airspace as an extension 

to Class D airspace and amend the 

description of the Class E airspace 

extending upward 700 feet above the 

surface at Oxford-Waterbury Airport, 

Oxford, CT. The Waterbury NDB has 

been decommissioned and reference to 

the navigation aid would be removed 

from the airspace description for the 

safety and management of IFR 

operations at Waterbury-Oxford Airport. 

The Class E surface airspace 

designations as an extension to Class D 

and the Class E 700 foot airspace 

designations are published in Paragraph 

6004 and 6005, respectively, of FAA 

order 7400.9T, signed August 27, 2009, 

and effective September 15, 2009, which 

is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 

71.1. The Class E airspace designations 

listed in this document will be 

published subsequently in the Order. 

The FAA has determined that this 

proposed regulation only involves an 

established body of technical 

regulations for which frequent and 

routine amendments are necessary to 

keep them operationally current. It, 

therefore, (1) Is not a ‘‘significant 

regulatory action’’ under Executive 

Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant 

rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies 

and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 

26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant 

preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation 

as the anticipated impact is so minimal. 

Since this is a routine matter that will 

only affect air traffic procedures and air 

navigation, it is certified that this 

proposed rule, when promulgated, 

would not have a significant economic 

impact on a substantial number of small 

entities under the criteria of the 

Regulatory Flexibility Act. 

The FAA’s authority to issue rules 

regarding aviation safety is found in 

Title 49 of the United States Code. 

Subtitle I, section 106 describes the 

authority of the FAA Administrator. 

Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, 

describes in more detail the scope of the 

agency’s authority. This proposed 

rulemaking is promulgated under the 

authority described in subtitle VII, part, 

A, subpart I, section 40103. Under that 

section, the FAA is charged with 

prescribing regulations to assign the use 

of airspace necessary to ensure the 

safety of aircraft and the efficient use of 

airspace. This proposed regulation is 

within the scope of that authority as it 

would amend controlled airspace at 

Waterbury-Oxford Airport, Oxford, CT. 

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, 

Navigation (Air). 

The Proposed Amendment 

In consideration of the foregoing, the 

Federal Aviation Administration 

proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as 

follows: 

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, 

B, C, D, AND CLASS E AIRSPACE 

AREAS; AIR TRAFFIC SERVICE 

ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS 

1. The authority citation for part 71 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113, 

40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959– 

1963 Comp., p. 389. 

§ 71.1 [Amended] 

2. The incorporation by reference in 

14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation 

Administration Order 7400.9T, Airspace 

Designations and Reporting Points, 

signed August 27, 2009, effective 

September 15, 2009, is amended as 

follows: 

Paragraph 6004 Class E Airspace Areas 

Designated as an Extension to a Class D 

Surface Area 

* * * * * 

ANE CT E4 Oxford, CT [REMOVED] 

* * * * * 

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas 

Extending Upward From 700 Feet or More 

Above the Surface of the Earth 

* * * * * 

ANE CT E5 Oxford, CT [AMENDED] 

Waterbury-Oxford Airport, CT 

(Lat. 41°28′43′′ N., long. 73°08′07′′ W.) 

That airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface within an 8-mile radius 

of the Waterbury-Oxford Airport. 

Issued in College Park, Georgia, on August 

12, 2010. 

Myron A. Jenkins, 

Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, 

Eastern Service Center, Air Traffic 

Organization. 

[FR Doc. 2010–21219 Filed 8–25–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

Internal Revenue Service 

26 CFR Parts 1, 31, 40, and 301 

[REG–153340–09] 

RIN 1545–BJ13 

Electronic Funds Transfer of 

Depository Taxes; Correction 

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), 

Treasury. 

ACTION: Correction to notice of proposed 

rulemaking and notice of public 

hearing. 

SUMMARY: This document contains 

corrections to a notice of proposed 

rulemaking and notice of public hearing 

(REG–153340–09) that were published 

in the Federal Register on Monday, 

August 23, 2010, relating to Federal tax 

deposits (FTDs) by Electronic Funds 

Transfer (EFT). 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Michael E. Hara, (202) 622–4910 (not a 

toll-free number). 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

The correction notice that is the 

subject of this document is under 

sections 1461, 6302, 6656, and 7502 of 

the Internal Revenue Code. 

Need for Correction 

As published, the notice of proposed 

rulemaking and notice of public hearing 

(REG–153340–09), published on 

Monday, August 23, 2010 (75 FR 

51707), contain errors that may prove to 

be misleading and are in need of 

clarification. 

Correction of Publication 

Accordingly, the publication of the 

notice of proposed rulemaking and 

notice of public hearing (REG–153340– 

09), which was the subject of FR Doc. 

2010–20737, is corrected as follows: 

1. On page 51707, column 2, in the 

preamble, under the caption DATES:, 

fifth line, the language ‘‘September 21, 

2010, must be received’’ is corrected to 

read ‘‘September 27, 2010, must be 

received’’. 

2. On page 51708, column 2, in the 

preamble, under the paragraph heading 

‘‘Comments and Public Hearing’’, last 

paragraph of the column, second line, 

the language ‘‘for September 21, 2010, at 


erowe on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS-1