alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                          
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                            
|View History:                                                             
|                                                                          
|Virginia Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Oil Wells (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                          
|                                                                          
|Virginia Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Oil Wells (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 9      | 9      | 12     | 8      | 5      | 4      | 2      | 5     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 3      | 2      | 6      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
No. 12-5598.

#### Tornheim *v.*Blue & White Food Products Corp.

App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 2d Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.
U.S. Domestic and Foreign Coal Distribution by State of Origin

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
U.S. Energy Information Administration | Annual Coal Distribution Report 2022

Domestic and Foreign Distribution of U.S. Coal by State of Origin, 2022

(thousand short tons)

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Coal Exports

Coal Origin State

and Region

Domestic

Distribution

By Coal

Mines

By Brokers

& Traders*

Total

Exports

Total

Distribution

Alabama 1,201.3 5,815.1 2,356.8 8,171.9 9,373.2

Alaska 731.0 - - - 731.0

Arkansas 7.2 - - - 7.2

Colorado 9,287.6 - 2,235.4 2,235.4 11,522.9

Illinois 27,357.1 7,995.7 582.6 8,578.3 35,935.4

Indiana 21,131.1 - 1,115.0 1,115.0 22,246.2

Kentucky Total 23,146.2 643.7 3,488.2 4,131.9 27,278.1

 East 6,799.8 643.7 2,817.7 3,461.3 10,261.1

 West 16,346.4 - 670.5 670.5 17,016.9

Louisiana 330.3 - - - 330.3

Maryland 1,114.7 22.1 110.7 132.9 1,247.6

Mississippi 3,209.1 - - - 3,209.1

Missouri 74.7 - - - 74.7

Montana 17,820.4 - 2,972.1 2,972.1 20,792.5

New Mexico 11,273.0 - - - 11,273.0

North Dakota 26,736.1 - - - 26,736.1

Ohio 3,240.6 - 82.8 82.8 3,323.4

Oklahoma 4.8 - - - 4.8

Pennsylvania Total 24,389.0 2,154.0 11,993.5 14,147.5 38,536.6

 Anthracite 99.0 6.4 525.6 532.0 631.0

 Bituminous 24,290.0 2,147.6 11,467.9 13,615.6 37,905.6

Tennessee 2.5 - - - 2.5

Texas 17,291.9 - - - 17,291.9

Utah 9,076.5 1,199.2 1,603.2 2,802.5 11,879.0

Virginia 3,403.8 2,785.1 4,546.8 7,332.0 10,735.8

West Virginia Total 49,656.0 19,594.4 13,474.0 33,068.4 82,724.5

 Northern 33,935.9 7,620.0 2,027.9 9,647.9 43,583.8

 Southern 15,720.1 11,974.4 11,446.1 23,420.5 39,140.6

Wyoming 244,423.4 1,089.5 95.8 1,185.2 245,608.6

Appalachian Total 89,807.8 31,014.5 35,382.3 66,396.8 156,204.6

Interior Total 85,752.5 7,995.7 2,368.1 10,363.9 96,116.4

Western Total 319,348.1 2,288.7 6,906.4 9,195.1 328,543.2

East of Mississippi River 157,851.6 39,010.2 37,750.4 76,760.6 234,612.2

West of Mississippi River 337,056.9 2,288.7 6,906.4 9,195.1 346,252.0

U.S. Total 494,908.4 41,298.9 44,656.8 85,955.7 580,864.2

* Data are a combination of estimated and observed values reported by coal traders, brokers, and terminals.

- = No data reported.

Note: Coal imports are excluded in this report. Total may not equal sum of components because of independent rounding.

Sources: U.S. Energy Information Administration Form EIA-923, "Power Plant Operations Report," Form EIA-3, "Quarterly Survey of Industrial,

Commercial & Institutional Coal Users," Form EIA-7A, "Annual Survey of Coal Production and Preparation," Form EIA-8A, "Annual Survey of Coal Stocks and Coal

Exports," and Bureau of the Census, U.S. Department of Commerce, "Monthly Report EM 545."
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0435

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

DONALD RAY CHERRY,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including May 13, 2022, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 6 2022

04/06/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0435
# stimulus
## NUMBER 13

- 2 2

- 00 226

- C V

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

GERARDO CASTILLO

, Appellant,

v.

U.S. BANK, N.A., SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE

TO LASALLE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,

ON BEHALF OF THE HOLDERS OF BEAR

STEARNS ASSET BAKED SECURITIES I

TRUST 2007

- HE7, ASSET

- BACKED

CERTIFICATES SERIES 2007

- HE7

, Appellee s

.

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

of Hidalgo County, Texas.



## ORDER TO FILE APPELLANT’S BRIEF

Before Justices Benavides, Hinojosa, and Tijerina

Order Per Curiam

This cause is currently before the Court on appellant’s second amended motion

for extension of time to file brief

. The Court, having fully examined and considered the2

extensions previously granted in this cause and appellant’s pending motion is o f the

opinion that the extension requested should be granted by Order.

It is therefore ordered that pro se appellan t Gerard o Castillo file an appellate brief

with this Court on or before 5:00 p.m. on January 2 7 , 202 3

. A ppellant is reminded the

Court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution

, unless appellant complies with this

order or timely requests an extension which reasonably explains the failure and

appellee s are not significantly injured by the appellant’s failure to timely file a

brief. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b),(c).

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

22nd day of December

, 202 2

.
Exhibit 13.1














PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350









In connection with this Annual Report of Aegean Marine Petroleum Network Inc. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, E. Nikolas Tavlarios, President and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.





Date: April 12, 2012








/s/ E. Nikolas Tavlarios


E. Nikolas Tavlarios


President and Principal Executive Officer
No. 12-6391.

#### Watson *v.*Unknown Clerk 1 et al.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          27,685
<SECURITIES>                                     1,666
<RECEIVABLES>                                   53,466
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,501
<INVENTORY>                                     35,937
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               132,316
<PP&E>                                         205,011
<DEPRECIATION>                                  50,396
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 412,326
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           97,027
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,139
<OTHER-SE>                                      33,929
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   412,326
<SALES>                                        108,779
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               108,799
<CGS>                                           94,218
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  104,543
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,469
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (786)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       315
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (512)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (512)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.36
        

</TABLE>
#### State v. Shugart

109,795

07/22/2015

Denied

Unpublished
LJOI- 0~1- l'"'\'1 + .. 'L 'OZT' 

Dennis.DeVany@DOT .gov 

September 20, 2011 

Mr. Dennis J. DeVany 

GRAND COUNTY COUNCIL MEMBERS 

Chris Baird (Chair) · Chris Conrad (Vice Chair) 

Jim Nyland · Ken Ballantyne · Gene Ciarus 

Audrey Graham· Pat Holyoak 

,··.:,. 

Chief, Essential Air Service Division, X-53 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Mr. DeVany: 

:./) 

The Grand County Airport Board and Grand County Council have reviewed the proposals submitted to 

your office for Essential Air Service at Moab, Utah by Great Lakes Aviation and SeaPort Airlines. After 

considerable discussion, we strongly urge your office to accept the Great Lakes Aviation proposal. It is 

important to us to have continued use of 19-passenger, pressurized aircraft as again proposed by Great 

Lakes Aviation. In addition, Great Lakes Aviation's schedule and interline agreements with major carriers 

are a better fit for Grand County's citizens. 

Thank you for your willingness to consider the recommendation from both the Airport Board and the 

County Council on this matter. 

Chris Baird, Chair 

Grand County Council 

cc: David Sakrison, Moab City Mayor 

William J. Groff, Grand County Airport Board Chair 

Council's Office ·125 E. Center St.· Moab, UT 84532 · (435) 259-1346 · www.grandcountyutab.net 

'· i 

!
No. 12-6334.

#### Higdon *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
#### Muller v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue

110,757

06/29/2015

Denied. .

Unpublished
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 70 (Friday, April 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 17829]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-9365]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Dkt. C-3712]


American Isuzu Motors Inc., Prohibited Trade Practices, and 
Affirmative Corrective Actions

AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.

ACTION: Consent order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In settlement of alleged violations of federal law prohibiting 
unfair or deceptive acts or practices and unfair methods of 
competition, this consent order prohibits, among other things, a 
California-based automobile manufacturer from misrepresenting the total 
amount due at lease inception, requires the manufacturer to provide 
consumers with clear, readable, and understandable cost information in 
their car lease and financed purchase advertising, requires 
advertisements that reference an initial payment or state that no 
initial payment is due to clearly and conspicuously disclose, as 
applicable, that the deal is a lease, and to disclose the fact that an 
extra charge may be imposed at the end of the lease based on the 
residual value of the car.

DATES: Complaint and Order issued February 6, 1997.\1\

    \1\ Copies of the Complaint and the Decision and Order are 
available from the Commission's Public Reference Branch, H-130, 6th 
Street & Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20580.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Medine, FTC/S-4429, Washington, 
D.C. 20580. (202) 326-3224.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On Thursday, December 5, 1996, there was 
published in the Federal Register, 61 FR 64524, a proposed consent 
agreement with analysis In the Matter of General Motors Corporation and 
American Isuzu Motor Inc., for the purpose of soliciting public 
comment. Interested parties were given sixty (60) days in which to 
submit comments, suggestions or objections regarding the proposed form 
of the order.
    No comments having been received, the Commission has ordered the 
issuance of the complaint in the form contemplated by the agreement, 
made its jurisdictional findings and entered an order to cease and 
desist, as set forth in the proposed consent agreement, in disposition 
of this proceeding.

(Sec. 6, 38 Stat. 721; 15 U.S.C. 46. Interpret or apply sec. 5, 38 
Stat. 719, as amended; 82 Stat. 146, 147; 15 U.S.C. 45, 1601, et 
seq.; 15 U.S.C. 1667-1667e; 12 CFR 226)
[FR Doc. 97-9365 Filed 4-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-M
No. 12-211.

#### Glunk *v.*Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Bureau of Professional and Occupational Affairs (State Board of Medicine).

Commw. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.
IL EPA comments on draft NPDES Permit Lowry, Leslie
to: Jack Faulk 01/25/2010 05:55 PM Cc: "Keller, Al", "LeCrone, Darin" Show Details

Jack,

Here are some additional comments on the draft NPDES Pesticide Permit.

1.1.1 Leaving “near” out of the permit opens EP A and the states up to many questions and possible
p ermit appeals because the court decision included “n ear waters” of the U.S. The Agency is also
concerned about 3 rd party lawsuits on this issue.

1.1.1 Need to include another use category for terres trial agriculture applicati on as it is near or in waters of the U.S.

1.2.2 Bullet 4. You include farms or ranches, wh at is the rational behind excluding these from submitting an NOI. During the meet ing it was mentioned that your intent was to exclude these facilities even though they were included in this section.

1.2.5.1 What is the rational for posti ng terminations? There does not appear to be any rational for
p osting the terminations and allowing for any public notice requirement. This seems to be a very poor use of resources, especially since most states are already very resource limited.

1.2.5.2 If a new operator takes over responsibility of th e pest control activities why do they need to terminate the old permit? Why can’t the permit just be transferred to the new operator and have the new operator submit a NOI? This proces s would be similar to minor modifications fo r individual permits. There would be less of an administrative burden alleviating one of the steps.

5.0 What is the justifica tion for not posting the PDMPs? The Illinois general stormwater permit requires that the SWPPP be posted and this coul d be an issue with environmental groups.

6.3.2 We recommend only a 5 day adverse incident written report which is similar to other Illinois
p ermits.

6.4 We recommend only 5 days here as well.

Appendix F On the NOI form you have the a pplicant providing a map and a description of the location of pesticide applic ation, but you don’t have them listing all of the water bodies in that area. That is putting the burden on the regulating agency of identify the water bodies. The water bodies need to be identified because the regulating agency will have to ensure that none of the streams are waters or tier 3 waters. Therefore the require ment to identify all the water bodies in the application site should fall on the applicant.

Appendix F The NOI should also include a sec tion for the applicant to check whether any of the affected water bodies are tier 3 waters or water bodi es that have an impairment. Again putting the b urden on the applicant instead of the re g ulatin g a g enc y

. Page 1 of 2

5/12/2010 file://C:\Documents and Settin g s\ j faulk\Local Settin g s\Tem p \notesFCBCEE\~web1914.htmLeslie Lowry Environmental Engineer Industrial Unit, IEPA 1021 North Grand Ave. East Springfield, IL 62794 (217) 782-4209 Page 2 of 2

5/12/2010 file://C:\Documents and Settin g s\ j faulk\Local Settin g s\Tem p \notesFCBCEE\~web1914.htm
#### James E. EATON, Petitioner, v. TRUSTMARK NATIONAL BANK, Respondent.

CASE NO. 1D17-1338

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed August 9, 2017

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Original Jurisdiction.

DENIED.
No. 12-5833.

#### Creamer *v.*Smith County Sheriff’s Department.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4.

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-41235 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. GUADALUPE DELGADO-HERNANDEZ Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:07-CR-587-ALL Before GARZA, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Guadalupe DelgadoHernandez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Andersv. California, 386U.S. 738 (1967). Delgado-Hernandez has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdrawis GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D August 20, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 388 

Expressing the sense of the Senate regarding unfair and discriminatory measures of the Government of Japan in failing to apply the Eco-Friendly 

Vehicle Purchase Program to vehicles made by United States automakers. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 20, 2010 

Ms. STABENOW submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Finance 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the Senate regarding unfair and 

discriminatory measures of the Government of Japan 

in failing to apply the Eco-Friendly Vehicle Purchase 

Program to vehicles made by United States automakers. 

Whereas the Consumer Assistance to Recycle and Save Act 

of 2009 (49 U.S.C. 32901 note) established the CARS 

Program to jumpstart automobile sales and increase fuel 

efficiency nationwide by providing incentives to purchase 

new fuel efficient automobiles; 

Whereas, on August 25, 2009, a total of 677,842 new vehicles had been purchased through the CARS Program; 

Whereas according to the United States Department of 

Transportation, over 319,000 Japanese made automobiles were purchased through the CARS Program; 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 388 IS 

Whereas the CARS Program was open to automobiles manufactured in countries other than the United States, the 

rebate associated with the current and planned extension 

of the Eco-Friendly Vehicle Purchase Program in Japan 

does not apply to automobiles made by United States 

automobile manufacturers; and 

Whereas the Senate finds that by maintaining and extending 

the Eco-Friendly Vehicle Purchase Program, the Government of Japan is engaging in unfair and discriminatory 

measures contrary to Japan’s obligations under the 

agreements of the World Trade Organization Agreement: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that— 

2 (1) the President should direct the United 

3 States Trade Representative to continue to negotiate 

4 with the Government of Japan to eliminate the un5 fair and discriminatory measures relating to Japan’s 

6 Eco-Friendly Vehicle Purchase Program; and 

7 (2) if the United States Trade Representative is 

8 not able to obtain a satisfactory agreement with the 

9 Government of Japan, the United States Trade Rep10 resentative shall initiate consultations under the 

11 framework of the World Trade Organization. 

Æ 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS