alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 78 (Thursday, April 23, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 20175]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10823]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP96-367-009]


Northwest Pipeline Corporation; Notice of Compliance Filing

April 17, 1998.
    Take notice that on April 6, 1998, Northwest Pipeline Corporation 
(Northwest) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, the 
tariff sheets listed on Appendix A to the filing, with the effective 
date indicated.
    Northwest states that the purpose of this filing is to comply with 
the Commission's November 25, 1997 Letter Order approving the Offer of 
Settlement filed in the referenced proceeding on July 22, 1997 as 
reaffirmed by the Commission in an Order Denying Rehearing on April 1, 
1998.
    Northwest states that the rates included in this compliance filing 
are for two separate rate periods. The First Period One rates are for 
March 1, 1997 through February 28, 1998. The Second Period One rates 
are for March 1, 1998 forward. Northwest states that the base rates for 
the entire period have been restated in the new proposed tariff sheets 
in Appendix A to the filing. All affected rate schedule tariff sheets 
that were in effect from March 1, 1997 through April 1, 1998 have been 
changed. The proposed tariff sheets reflect these changes.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-10823 Filed 4-22-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
The Attorney General of Texas 

MARK WHITE 

Attorney General 

November 12, 1980 

Honorable Bill Stubblefield 

Williamson County Attorney 

Georgetown, Texas 78626 

Opinion No. w-269 

Re: Whether conveyance of a strip 

of land requires vacating of an 

original plat and replatting under 

article 974a, V.T.C.S. 

Dear Mr. Stubblefield: 

You inquire about the application of article 974a, V.T.C.S:, to the 

conveyance of a strip of land not effected for the purpose of laying out a 

subdivision or s&urban lots. You infofm us that the original purchasers of a 

house and lot in the stidivision discovered that the house bed been 

inadvertently situated approximately one foot from a lot line, in violation of 

local setback ordinances. The developer owns the adjacent lot and has 

offered to convey a strip of land along the lot line wide enough to satisfy 

setback requirements. This conveyance would leave the unsold lot of 

adequate size for residential construction. 

You ask the following questions: 

L Is there a violation of article 974a, V.T.C.S., if 

the developer conveys the strip of land by metes and 

bounds? 

m Main Plaza. suite 4w 2. May sn amendment to the plat be filed to 

San A”10”10. TX~ 78205 reflect the conveyance, and, if so, sbject to what 

512,225.4191 procedure? 

An Eq”al OpPOrf”“~ly/ A recorded s&division plat may not be amended except in conA,,irmstiAction ”e Employer formsnce with section 5 of article 974a, V.T.C.S. Priolo v. City of Dallas, 

257 S.W. 2d 947 (Tex. Civ. App. - Dallas 1953, writ reCd n.r.e.); McGraw v. 

Cit of Dallas, 420 S.W. 2d 793 ‘(Tex. Civ. App. - Dallas 1967, writ rePd 

iizhmr e v. City of Graham, 287 S.W. 2d 527 (Tex. Civ. App. - Fort 

Worth 1956, writ rePd n.r.e.). Section 5 of article 974a requires, in cases 

where lots in a s&division have been sold, that a stidivision plat be vacated, 

in whole or in part, before an amendment such as you propose can become 

effective. After a vacation, a conveyance by metes and bounds could be 

made and a new plat could be filed. Under the circumstances that you 
Honorable Bill Stubblefield - Page Two (MW-269) 

describe, a vacation of the part of the plat showing the two affected lots would require 

the approval of all of the owners of lots in the subdivision. 

It would seem that a more practical solution to the problem of the violation of 

the local setback crdinance would be to apply for a variance to the setback 

requirement. If the variance was granted, there would no longer be a violation. 

SUMMARY 

Although a land owner may convey a strip of land by metes 

and bounds, the plat of the subdivision cannot be amended to 

reflect that conveyance. It must be vacated and mplatted 

pursuant to article 974a, V.T.C.S. 

$f-gg7 

Attorney General of Texas 

JOHN W. FAINTER, JR. 

First Assistant Attorney General 

RICHARD E. GRAY III 

Executive Assistant Attorney General 

Prepared by Susan Garrison 

Assistant Attorney General 

APPROVED: 

OPINION COMMD’TEE 

Susan Garrison, Acting Chairman 

Ralph Aldave 

Jon Bible 

Rick Gilpin 

Bruce Youngblood 

p. 856
|                                                                                   
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                     
|View History:                                                                      
|                                                                                   
|New Mexico Natural Gas Deliveries to Electric Power Consumers  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                   
|                                                                                   
|New Mexico Natural Gas Deliveries to Electric Power Consumers  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                   

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3  | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | -------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |         |        |        |        | 40,256 | 45,534 | 43,018 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 46,885 | 48,981 | 37,324 | 37,849  | 30,817 | 41,207 | 55,506 | 61,050 | 68,742 | 70,102 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 70,694 | 73,379 | 74,357 | 74,817  | 76,973 | 78,337 | 81,274 | 75,459 | 98,438 | 103,430
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 99,840 | 81,976 | 88,248 | 113,087 |        |        |        |        |        |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
No. 12-5997.

#### Klincar *v.*Illinois.

App. Ct. Ill., 5th Dist. Certiorari denied.
**EXHIBIT
31.2**
 ****
 ****
 **302
CERTIFICATION**
 
  I, L.J.
McLaughlin, certify that:
   1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Longview Fibre Company;
   2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
   3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
   4. The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
   (a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
   (b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and
   (c)
disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect the
control over financial reporting; and
   5. The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
   (a) all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
   (b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.
   L. J.
McLAUGHLIN 3/10/05
   L. J.
McLAUGHLIN,
   Senior
Vice President-Finance,
   Secretary
and Treasurer
|                                                                   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                     
|View History:                                                      
|                                                                   
|Iowa Natural Gas Underground Storage Capacity  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                   
|                                                                   
|Iowa Natural Gas Underground Storage Capacity  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                   

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |         |         | 311,000 | 311,000
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 229,700 | 279,700 | 279,700 | 279,700 | 270,200 | 270,200 | 270,200 | 408,200 | 273,200 | 273,200
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 273,200 | 273,000 | 273,200 | 273,200 | 273,200 | 273,200 | 275,200 | 278,238 | 284,747 | 284,811
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 288,010 | 288,210 | 288,210 | 288,210 | 288,210 | 288,210 | 288,210 | 288,210 | 288,210 | 288,210
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 288,210 | 288,210 | 288,210 |         |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
|                                                                                          
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                            
|View History:                                                                             
|                                                                                          
|Percent of Commercial Natural Gas Deliveries in Nevada Represented by the Price  (Percent)
|                                                                                          
|                                                                                          
|Percent of Commercial Natural Gas Deliveries in Nevada Represented by the Price  (Percent)
|                                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 97.7   | 90.8   | 88.3   | 92.7   | 82.5   | 76.5   | 74.2   | 71.3   | 70.2   | 60.9  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 54.6   | 73.9   | 78.5   | 67.2   | 67.9   | 68.1   | 68.2   | 67.0   | 67.0   | 65.1  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 65.4   | 64.3   | 61.4   | 60.1   | 58.4   | 57.9   | 58.5   | 59.1   | 58.6   | 60.2  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 70.0   | 61.7   | 63.3   | 64.7   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### Tavaris Eugene KNIGHT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-68

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 24, 2017

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hills-borough County; Chet A. Tharpe, Judge.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 77 (Wednesday, April 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 19910]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10611]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP98-342-000]


Southern Natural Gas Company; Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

April 16, 1998.
    Take notice that on April 9, 1998, Southern Natural Gas Company 
(Southern), P.O. Box 2563, Birmingham, Alabama 35202-2563, filed in 
Docket No. CP98-342-000 a request pursuant to Sections 157.205 and 
157.216(b) of the Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act 
(18 CFR 157.205 and 157.216) for approval to abandon by removal a 
measurement facility at a delivery point, under Southern blanket 
certificate issued in Docket No. CP82-406-000, pursuant to Section 7(c) 
of the Natural Gas Act (NGA), all as more fully set forth in the 
request which is on file with the Commission and open to public 
inspection.
    Southern states that it constructed the delivery point facility to 
sell and deliver natural gas at the Texas Eastern Meter Station on 
Southern's fourteen-inch Logansport Line in Bienville Parish, Louisiana 
under an agreement between Southern and Texas Eastern Transmission 
Corporation (Tetco) dated February 2, 1948. Southern further states 
that the exchange agreement under which service was provided at the 
meter station was abandoned by the parties by Commission order dated 
July 19, 1996 in Docket No. CP96-332-000. Southern asserts that service 
at the meter station has not been active for over ten years. 
Accordingly, Southern proposes to abandon the meter station.
    Any person or the Commission's Staff may, within 45 days of the 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 
385.214), a motion to intervene and pursuant to Section 157.205 of the 
regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205), a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, 
the proposed activities shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
and not withdrawn 30 days after the time allowed for filing a protest, 
the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-10611 Filed 4-21-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from SEC
Form 10-Q. Items 1 through 22 are as of March 31, 1999. Items 23 through 38
are for the three months ended March 31, 1999.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      367,650
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                      6,551
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          84,873
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        22,254
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 481,328
<COMMON>                                        16,080
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      112,558
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             57,454
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 186,092
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           159,771
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                      200
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 135,265
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  481,328
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                       79,534
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             5,495
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      62,263
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      67,758
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         11,776
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 238
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  12,014
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         2,958
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,056
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                    9,056
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       (5,239)
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        2,159
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          34,209
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .56
        

</TABLE>