alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**
**Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a)
**of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
I, Terry A. Hanson, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MGE Energy, Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omitto state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:

	a.	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; and

	b.	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

	c.	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

	a.	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controlover financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial; and

	b.	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ Terry A. HansonVice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary  Date: August 9, 2004****
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2011-0348 Directorate Identifier: 2011-NM-069-AD 

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell. 

Estimated Costs: 

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance) Action 

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement) 

Work-hours 

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up) 

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our) 

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts) 

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered 

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet 

DFEC inspection 6.0 $ 510.00 $0 $ 510.00 195 $99,450.00

NDT EC inspection 15.0 $1,020.0

0 $0 $1,020.00 195 $198,900.00

Repair *- 

*variable cost $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance: 

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $348,075

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $ 

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): 

 Indicates related information in AD Manual, FAA-IR-M-8040.1C. DOUBLE CLICK to follow the link 

Executive Order 12866: 

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
#### Stephen M. HLUBOKY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D16-2955

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[September 28, 2017]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Samantha Schosberg Feuer, Judge; L.T. Case No. 2015CF000541AMB.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 76 (Tuesday, April 21, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 19735]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10404]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 98N-0148]


International Drug Scheduling; Convention on Psychotropic 
Substances; Dihydroetorphine, Ephedrine, and Remifentanil; Isomers of 
Psychotropic Substances

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is correcting a notice that 
appeared in the Federal Register of March 18, 1998 (63 FR 13258). The 
document announced an upcoming World Health Organization review of 
three substances. The document was published with an error. This 
document corrects that error.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nicholas P. Reuter, Office of Health 
Affairs (HFY-20), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, 
Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-1696, E-mail: NR<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3550404150477557545b525441501b5351541b525a43"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d6b3a3a2b3a496b4b7b8b1b7a2b3f8b0b2b7f8b1b9a0">[email protected]</span></a>.

    In FR Doc. 98-6910, beginning on page 13258 in the Federal Register 
of Wednesday, March 18, 1998, the following correction is made:
    1. On page 13259, in the first column, in the fourth full 
paragraph, the second sentence ``Remifentanil is approved in the United 
States as an anesthetic for use in animals and is controlled 
domestically as a narcotic in schedule II of the CSA.'' is corrected to 
read as follows: ``Remifentanil is approved in the United States as an 
anesthetic and is controlled domestically as a narcotic in schedule II 
of the CSA.''

    Dated: April 14, 1998.
William K. Hubbard,
Associate Commissioner for Policy Coordination.
[FR Doc. 98-10404 Filed 4-20-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Didde v. City of Chapman

106,090

10/17/13

Denied

Unpublished
|                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                           
|View History:                                                            
|                                                                         
|Natural Gas Citygate Price in Illinois  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                         
|                                                                         
|Natural Gas Citygate Price in Illinois  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        | 3.44   | 3.43   | 3.02   | 2.81   | 2.74   | 2.99  
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 3.09   | 2.91   | 3.20   | 3.30   | 3.02   | 2.59   | 3.27   | 3.28   | 2.77   | 3.00  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 5.01   | 5.54   | 3.68   | 5.97   | 6.38   | 8.38   | 8.26   | 7.87   | 8.48   | 5.71  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 5.52   | 5.09   | 4.11   | 4.43   | 6.28   | 3.82   | 3.38   | 3.76   | 3.69   | 3.18  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2.87   | 6.56   | 6.24   | 4.04   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
|                                                                            
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                              
|View History:                                                               
|                                                                            
|No chart available.                                                         
|No chart available.                                                         
|                                                                            
|                                                                            
|Oklahoma Nonhydrocarbon Gases Removed from Natural Gas  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | -      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
DISMISS and Opinion Filed August 30, 2021 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-21-00699-CR No. 05-21-00700-CR LINDSEY KINSER, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TE XAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 6 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. F19-25055-X & F18-41626-X MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Molberg, Goldstein, and Smith Opinion by Justice Smith On August 16, 2021, Lindsey Kinser’s notices of appeals were filed in the above appeals. According to the notices, a ppellant sought to appeal the trial court’s July 20, 2021 order continuing appellant on probation in each case. Several other documents were filed along with the noti ces, including the trial court’s August 4, 2021 order granting appellant’s motion to w ithdraw her appeals and August 4, 2021 judgments adjudicating guilt in each case. As a general rule, an a ppellate court may consid er appeals by criminal defendants only after conviction. Wright v. State , 969 S.W.2d 588, 589 (Tex. App.— Dallas 1998, no pet.). With re gards to deferred adjudica tion, the Legislature has–2– authorized appeal of only two types of orders: (1) an or der granting deferred adjudication, and (2) an order imposing puni shment pursuant to an adjudication of guilt. Davis v. State , 195 S.W.3d 708, 711 (Tex. Cr im. App. 2006). Orders modifying the terms or conditions of de ferred adjudication are not themselves appealable. Id . Because appellant’s notices of appe al challenge the trial court’s July 20, 2021 orders continuing her on probation, we lack jurisdiction over the appeals. To the extent the trial court signed an order granting appellant’s motion to withdraw her appeals, we note that the rule s of appellate procedure provide that “[a]t any time before the appella te court’s decision, the appellate court may dismiss the appeal upon the appellant’s motion.” T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.2(a) (emphasis added). In other words, the trial court lacked authority to dismiss our appeals. We dismiss these appeals.

Do Not Publish T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b) 210699F.U05 /C r aig Smith / CRAIG SMITH JUSTICE–3– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

LINDSEY KINSER, Appellant

No. 05-21-00699-CR V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 6, Dall as County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F19-25055-X. Opinion delivered by Justice Smith. Justices Molberg and Goldstein participating. Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this appeal.

Judgment entered August 30, 2021–4– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

LINDSEY KINSER, Appellant

No. 05-21-00700-CR V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 6, Dall as County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F18-41626-X. Opinion delivered by Justice Smith. Justices Molberg and Goldstein participating. Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this appeal.

Judgment entered August 30, 2021
|                                                                                               
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                 
|View History:                                                                                  
|                                                                                               
|Wisconsin Natural Gas Price Sold to Electric Power Consumers  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                               
|                                                                                               
|Wisconsin Natural Gas Price Sold to Electric Power Consumers  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                               

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 3.17   | 2.67   | 2.93  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 4.48   | 4.76   | 3.51   | 5.79   | 6.41   | 8.77   | 7.35   | 7.56   | 9.24   | 4.83  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 5.43   | 4.91   | 3.27   | 4.47   | W      | W      | W      | W      | 3.28   | W     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | W      | 3.82   | 5.97   | W      |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
|                                                                             
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                               
|View History:                                                                
|                                                                             
|U.S. Natural Gas Salt Underground Storage Activity-Net   (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                             
|                                                                             
|U.S. Natural Gas Salt Underground Storage Activity-Net   (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7 | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------ | ------- | -------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         | -19,376 | 5,419   | -12,622 | 6,367  | -21,639 | -569   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 24,200  | -47,490 | 4,864   | -25,973 | 22,970  | -33,755 | -18,935 | 20,001 | -42,044 | -56,010
|2010's                                                                                                                            | -58,295 | -92,413 | -19,528 | 28,713  | -81,890 | -56,282 | 31,727  | 50,373 | -3,729  | -23,613
|2020's                                                                                                                            | -13,947 | -11,884 | 76,369  | -70,682 |         |         |         |        |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
No. 12-6218.

#### Hinton *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.