H. Res. 1033 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

November 18, 2020. 

Whereas the Government of the People’s Republic of China 

(‘‘PRC’’) is legally bound to guarantee the civil liberties 

of the people of Hong Kong through 2047 and the ‘‘Joint 

Declaration of the Government of the United Kingdom of 

Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Government 

of the People’s Republic of China on the Question of 

Hong Kong’’ (hereafter the ‘‘Joint Declaration’’), in 

which the People’s Republic of China committed that for 

50 years, the basic policies would remain unchanged, including keeping the ‘‘social and economic systems in 

Hong Kong’’ unchanged; 

Whereas Article 39 of the Basic Law of Hong Kong mandates that: ‘‘The provisions of the International Covenant 

on Civil and Political Rights, the International Covenant 

on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, and international labour conventions as applied to Hong Kong 

shall remain in force and shall be implemented through 

the laws of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.’’; 

Whereas the Joint Declaration states that ‘‘Rights and freedoms, including those of the person, of speech, of the 

press, of assembly, of association, of travel, of movement, 

of correspondence, of strike, of choice of occupation, of 
2 

•HRES 1033 EH 

academic research and of religious belief will be ensured 

by law in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region’’ 

and that those rights are reiterated in Chapter III of the 

Basic Law; 

Whereas Chapter III of the Basic Law of Hong Kong guarantees Hong Kong residents other specific rights and 

freedoms, including— 

(1) freedom of speech, of the press, and of publication; 

(2) freedom of association, of assembly, of procession, and of demonstration; 

(3) the right and freedom to form and join trade 

unions and to strike; 

(4) freedom from arbitrary or unlawful arrest, detention, or imprisonment; 

(5) freedom from arbitrary or unlawful search of, or 

intrusion into, a Hong Kong resident’s home or other 

premises; 

(6) freedom and privacy of communication; 

(7) freedom of movement within the Hong Kong 

Special Administrative Region (‘‘HKSAR’’); 

(8) freedom of emigration to other countries and regions; 

(9) freedom of conscience; and 

(10) the right to institute legal proceedings in the 

courts against the acts of the executive authorities and 

their personnel; 

Whereas the PRC National People’s Congress Standing Committee (NPCSC) has inserted a national security law directly into Annex III of the Basic Law of Hong Kong, 

and said national security law is purportedly intended to 
3 

•HRES 1033 EH 

prevent and punish acts of ‘‘separating the country, subverting state power, and organizing terroristic activities’’; 

Whereas said action is a flagrant violation of Hong Kong’s 

autonomy and rule of law in that Article 18 of the Basic 

Law provides that laws included in Annex III are ‘‘confined to those relating to defense and foreign affairs as 

well as other matters outside the limits of the autonomy 

of the Region as specified by this Law’’; 

Whereas Article 11 of the Joint Declaration states that ‘‘The 

maintenance of public order in the Hong Kong Special 

Administrative Region will be the responsibility of the 

Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative 

Region’’; 

Whereas the national security law promulgated by the 

NPCSC violates Article 11 of the Joint Declaration by 

establishing PRC entities in Hong Kong with powers over 

public order; 

Whereas Article 23 further specifies that ‘‘[Hong Kong] shall 

enact laws on its own to prohibit any act of treason, secession, sedition, subversion against the Central People’s 

Government’’; 

Whereas through a similar abuse of Annex III of the Basic 

Law of Hong Kong, the PRC Government caused the 

adoption of the National Anthem Law in Hong Kong, 

which curtails the freedom of speech and carries a maximum sentence of 3 years, mirroring the extent of sentence under the People’s Republic of China Criminal 

Law; 

Whereas the PRC Government’s repeated and heavy-handed 

actions to undermine the rule of law in Hong Kong and 

Hong Kong’s high degree of autonomy will only further 
4 

•HRES 1033 EH 

escalate the ongoing protests and increase public disapproval of the PRC and the HKSAR Government, jeopardizing Hong Kong’s future as an open and prosperous 

international city; 

Whereas the full Chinese-language text of the national security legislation was not revealed until the Hong Kong 

Chief Executive promulgated the law in Hong Kong at 

11 p.m. on June 30, 2020, making it only the second law 

since 2008 that the NPCSC has passed without releasing 

a draft for public comment; and 

Whereas the imposition of this national security legislation, 

which undermines the established rights and freedoms of 

Hong Kong residents provided in the Joint Declaration 

and the Basic Law, constitutes a violation of commitments made by the PRC under international law: Now, 

therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) underscores that democratic societies around 

the world stand in solidarity with the people of Hong 

Kong, who face grave threats to their inviolable rights 

and freedoms; 

(2) condemns the action by the People’s Republic of 

China’s National People’s Congress to advance national 

security legislation for Hong Kong through irregular 

procedures, which constitutes a violation of the letter 

and spirit of the Joint Declaration, and the Basic Law 

which is the implementing document of the Joint Declaration; 
5 

•HRES 1033 EH 

(3) asserts that such actions by the People’s Republic of China undermine its credibility within the international community, including the People’s Republic of 

China’s credibility in honoring its commitments to international agreements and respecting internationally recognized human rights; 

(4) calls on the People’s Republic of China to immediately rectify provisions of the national security law inconsistent with the Joint Declaration and other provisions of the Basic Law including— 

(A) the judicial processes for national security 

cases; and 

(B) the law’s asserted extraterritorial jurisdiction; and 

(5) advises the President, the Secretary of State, 

and the Secretary of Treasury to coordinate with allies 

and partners to respond to developments in Hong Kong, 

including by— 

(A) appointing a United Nations Special Envoy 

for Hong Kong; 

(B) encouraging all relevant United Nations 

special rapporteurs to closely monitor and report on 

People’s Republic of China’s policies in Hong Kong, 

including the Special Rapporteur on freedom of 

opinion and expression, the Special Rapporteur on 
6 

•HRES 1033 EH 

freedom of peaceful assembly and of association, the 

Special Rapporteur on human rights defenders, the 

Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges 

and lawyers, the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism, the 

Special Rapporteur on torture, and the Working 

Group on arbitrary detention; 

(C) providing Hong Kong residents who face 

well-founded fears of persecution an opportunity to 

emigrate from, or not be compelled to return to, 

Hong Kong; 

(D) condemning the People’s Republic of 

China for promulgating national security legislation 

in Hong Kong which contravenes the Joint Declaration and the Basic Law; and 

(E) establishing other measures, including economic sanctions, to hold the People’s Republic of 

China accountable for contravention of international 

law and human rights norms with respect to Hong 

Kong. 

Attest: 

Clerk.