alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-05-00451- CV Em ili o K ifur i, I II, App e lla nt

v. P aula Youn g-K

if uri, Appellee F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF COM AL COUNTY , 274TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. C2001- 0630 C, HO NORAB LE CHARLES A. STEPH ENS, II, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R

A N D UM O P I N I O N Appellant Emilio Kifuri filed his notice of appea l w ith the district c ourt on J uly 18, 2005. The a

ppellate r ecor d was filed on D ece mber 1, 2005. On J anuar y 2, 2006, Kifuri soug ht an e xten sio n o f t ime to f

ile his br ie f, wh ic h th is C ourt g ra nte d, e xten din gthe date fo r f ili nghis br ie f t o Fe bruar y 16, 2006. On Fe bruar

y 28, 2006, the Clerk of this Court sent Kifuri notice that his brief was ove rdue a

nd instructed him to file his brief or an appr opriate motion by Marc h 10, 20 0 6. On Marc h 10, 2006, Kifuri soug ht a second extension of tim e to file his brief , which this Court gr anted, extending the date for filing his brief to March 31, 2006. O n Marc h 15, 2006, the Clerk of this Court informed Kif

uri that the C ourt would not consider any further reque sts for ex tensions. On April 11, 20 06 , th e Cle rk

of thi s Co ur t se nt Ki fu

ri no tic e that his br ie f w a s o ve rd ue and that hi s a pp e a l w ou ld be dismissed for wa

nt of prosec ution if he did not respond to this Court by April 21, 2006. To date,2

appellant ha s not responded to this Court’s notice. Acc ording ly , we dismiss the appea l for wa nt of prosec ution. Tex . R. App. P. 42.3(b), (c) .

__________________________________________ Bob Pembe rton, J ustice Be fore Chief J ustice L aw, Justi ces Patter son and Pemberton Dismissed for Want of Prosecution Filed: June 1, 2006
|                                                                                              
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                
|View History:                                                                                 
|                                                                                              
|Illinois Natural Gas Price Sold to Electric Power Consumers  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                              
|                                                                                              
|Illinois Natural Gas Price Sold to Electric Power Consumers  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 2.55   | 2.25   | 2.41  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 4.84   | 3.79   | 3.45   | 6.05   | 6.59   | 8.96   | 7.14   | 7.26   | 10.10  | 4.69  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 5.14   | W      | W      | W      | W      | W      | 2.88   | 3.32   | 3.46   | W     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | W      | 4.32   | 6.91   | 2.54   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### State v. Cline

108,251

08/20/2015

Denied.

Unpublished
|                                                                                                
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                  
|View History:                                                                                   
|                                                                                                
|Percent of Industrial Natural Gas Deliveries in North Dakota Represented by the Price  (Percent)
|                                                                                                
|                                                                                                
|Percent of Industrial Natural Gas Deliveries in North Dakota Represented by the Price  (Percent)
|                                                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 18.5   | 14.6   | 14.9  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 13.9   | 9.8    | 9.2    | 45.9   | 51.1   | 27.5   | 42.3   | 48.1   | 46.2   | 34.8  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 29.7   | 37.4   | 34.7   | 37.9   | 34.7   | 38.8   | 31.6   | 35.0   | 38.1   | 38.3  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 37.4   | 35.6   | 36.3   | 31.9   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
2006 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

6-20-2006

Petruska v. Gannon Univ

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential

Docket No. 05-1222

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2006 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Petruska v. Gannon Univ" (2006). 2006 Decisions. Paper 791.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006/791
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 05-1222

LYNETTE M. PETRUSKA,

 Appellant

v.

GANNON UNIVERSITY; THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF

GANNON UNIVERSITY; WILLIAM I. ALFORD, II;

ROBERT H. ALLSHOUSE; JOSEPH F. ALLISON;

MICHAEL P. ALLISON, REV.; JAMES A. BALDAUF;

L. SCOTT BARNARD; GEORGE J. BEHRINGER;

ARNOLD E. BERGQUIST; LAWRENCE E. BRANDT,

REV. MSGR.; ROBERT L. BRUGGER, REV. MSGR.;

DONALD M. CARLSON; DANIEL C. CARNEVAL, D.O.;

STEPHANIE DOMITROVICH, HON.; THOMAS L. DOOLIN;

JAMES J. DURATZ; ANTOINE M. GARIBALDI; THOMAS

C. GUELCHER; WILLIAM M. HILBERT, SR.; BRIAN

J. JACKMAN; JAMES W. KEIM, JR.; MARY RITA

KUHN, SR., SSJ; THOMAS J. LOFTUS; ANNE C.

MCCALLION; JOSEPH T. MESSINA; MICHAEL J.

NUTTALL; JOHN E. PAGANIE; DENISE ILLIG ROBISON;

JAMES J. RUTKOWSKI, JR.; JAMES A. SCHAFFNER;

HELEN M. SCHILLING, M.D., D.D.S.; JOHN M.

SCHULTZ, VERY REV.; ROBERT J. SMITH, REV.

MSGR.; LAWRENCE T. SPEICE, REV. MSGR.;

WILLIAM C. SPRINGER; JAMES G. TOOHEY; DONALD

W. TRAUTMAN, BISHOP; ANASTASIA VALIMONT, SR.

SSJ; RICARDA VINCENT, SR. SSJ; MELVIN WITHERSPOON;

ALL OTHER KNOWN AND UNKNOWN MEMBERS OF THE BOARD

OF TRUSTEES OF GANNON UNIVERSITY DURING THE

TENURE OF DONALD W. TRAUTMAN, as members of the

Board of Trustees of Gannon University; DAVID

RUBINO, MSGR., in their individual and official

capacities; NICHOLAS ROUCH, REV., in their

individual and official capacities
2

(D.C. Civ. No. 04-80)

SUR PETITION FOR REHEARING

Present: SCIRICA, Chief Judge,

SLOVITER, McKEE, RENDELL, AMBRO, FUENTES, SMITH, FISHER,

VAN ANTWERPEN and CHAGARES, Circuit Judges

A majority of the active judges having voted, it is ordered that the petition

is GRANTED. The Clerk of this Court is directed to VACATE the judgment of this Court

filed May 24, 2006, and to refer the case to the panel for panel rehearing. Because Judge

Edward R. Becker has died and circumstances have arisen which require Judge Richard

L. Nygaard to recuse, Judge Morton I. Greenberg and Judge Robert E. Cowen, who were

selected by random lottery by the Clerk, are assigned with Judge D. Brooks Smith to a

panel to rehear and determine the case.

BY THE COURT,

/s/ Anthony J. Scirica 

Chief Judge

Dated: June 20, 2006

tyw/cc: C. John Pleban, Esq.

 Evan C. Rudert, Esq.

 Kenneth W. Wargo, Esq.

 Frank L. Kroto Jr., Esq.

 Philip J. Murren, Esq.
exv10w14






EXHIBIT 10.14



AMENDMENT 1 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT



     This Amendment 1 to Employment Agreement (this “Amendment”), dated as of March 8, 2012 (the
“Effective Date”), is between C. Glynn Quattlebaum (“Employee”) and Regional Management Corp., a
Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”) and amends that certain Employment agreement dated as of
March 21, 2007 (the “Original Agreement”) between Employee and the Corporation. In consideration
for the mutual covenants set forth in this Amendment, Employee and the Corporation hereby agree as
follows:



     1. Definitions. Capitalized terms used in this Amendment and not otherwise defined in this
Amendment have the meaning ascribed to such terms in the Original Agreement. From and after the
effectiveness of this Amendment, the term “Agreement” shall mean the Original Agreement as amended
by this Amendment.



     2. Extension of Term. The first sentence of Section 2.1 of the Original Agreement is hereby
deleted and replaced in its entirety with the following sentence: “This Agreement and Employee’s
employment hereunder will commence on the Effective Date and terminate on March 21, 2017 (the
“Employment Term”), unless sooner terminated in accordance with Section 2.7.”



     3. No Further Amendments. Except to the extent amended by this Amendment, the Original
Agreement remains in full force and effect and unamended hereby. This Amendment shall constitute
part of the Agreement.



     4. Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which may
bear the signature of one or more parties hereto but which together shall constitute but a single
instrument. A copy of the Amendment bearing a facsimile, photostatic, PDF or other copy of the
signatures of a party hereto shall be as valid for all purposes as a copy of this Amendment bearing
that party’s original signature.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly executed as of
the day and year first above written.



REGIONAL MANAGEMENT CORP.





			
	By:	 	/s/ Thomas F. Fortin
         

    
	Name:	 	Thomas F. Fortin
         

    
	Title:	 	CEO
         

    





/s/ C. Glynn Quattlebaum
 

C. Glynn Quattlebaum
Exhibit 10.1 






                                                                
	A C A HOWE INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
Geological Consultants




	254 High Street, Berkhamsted, Hertfordshire,
      HP4 1AQ, UK 	Telephone:   	UK+1442 873398 

      Facsimile: UK+1442 865710 

      E-mail: howe@easynet.co.




	9th December 2002-12-09 




	The Diriectors 
Claude Resources Inc,

200,224-4th Ave.S. 
Saskatoon, 
Saskatchewan, 
Canada S7K 5M5




	Dear Sirs,




	With  reference  to the  classification  of
broken  underground  reserves in the  proven category,  the broken material is contained
within surveyed stopes,  the  tonnage of  material,  including  initial  swell drawn from
the stopes is known,  together  with mill  reconciliations,  and the grade of the broken
material  is  established  from face  samples  every  round which give both width of
round and  face  grade at every  advance,  including  dilution.  In my view,  the
material  therefore  falls within the confidence  limits of the proven category as used
at  the mine.




	Yours faithfully,




	/s/  Dr D Patrick




	Dr D Patrick
#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Troy WALKER, Petitioner

No. 504 MAL 2017

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

November 28, 2017

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 28th day of November, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.
No. 12-6209.

#### Collins *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 21

SUBSIDIARIES



|                                                   |  |                 |   |  |                                           
|-------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------- | - |  | ------------------------------------------
|Subsidiaries (1)                                   |  | PercentageOwned |   |  | State or OtherJurisdictionof Incorporation
|United Community Bank                              |  | 100             | % |  | United States                             
|                                                   |  |                
|United Community Bank Financial Services, Inc. (2) |  | 100             |   |  | Indiana                                   
|                                                   |  |                
|UCB Real Estate Management Holding, LLC (2)        |  | 100             |   |  | Indiana                                   



|(1) | Operations of United Community Bancorps wholly owned direct subsidiary, United Community Bank and United Community Banks wholly owned subsidiary are included in United
Community Bancorps consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | Second-tier subsidiary of United Community Bancorp 100% owned by United Community Bank, a first-tier subsidiary of United Community Bancorp.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### COM. v. HENDRICKS, M.

234 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/11/2017

CP-39-CR-0003173-2009 (Lehigh)

Affirmed
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

March 18, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00141

- CR

Mark A . KRIST, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CR5258 The Honorable Jennifer Pena, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R
The trial court’s certification in this appeal states “this criminal case is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” The clerk’s record contains a written plea bargain, and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant; Rule 25.2(a)(2) applies. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 25.2(a)(2). This court must dismiss this appeal “ if a certification that shows the defendant has a right of appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules.” Id. R. 25.2(d); see Chavez v. State , 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006).

We ORDER A ppellant to cause an amended trial court certification to be filed in this court within T WEN TY days of the date of this order showing A ppellant has the right of appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 25.2(d)
, 37.1; see also Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); Daniels v. State
, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2003, no pet.). If no amended trial court certification is filed as ordered, this appeal will be dismissed

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(d)

. All other appellate deadlines are SUSPENDED pending further order of this court

.

___________________ ______________ Patricia O. Alvarez, JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 18th day of March, 2019

.

______________ _____________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE
, Clerk of Court
#### William HARTMAN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D16-4118

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 1, 2017

L.T. No.: 16-05948-CF

Dismissed.
|                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                           
|View History:                                                            
|                                                                         
|Natural Gas Citygate Price in Arkansas  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                         
|                                                                         
|Natural Gas Citygate Price in Arkansas  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        | 3.00   | 3.00   | 2.83   | 2.51   | 2.43   | 2.47  
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 2.41   | 2.45   | 2.60   | 2.66   | 2.54   | 2.32   | 2.76   | 3.23   | 2.94   | 2.81  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 4.16   | 6.11   | 5.17   | 6.07   | 7.12   | 8.83   | 7.96   | 8.55   | 8.88   | 7.86  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 6.76   | 6.27   | 5.36   | 4.99   | 5.84   | 4.77   | 4.29   | 4.70   | 4.42   | 4.04  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 3.60   | 8.05   | 8.17   | 5.97   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 77 (Wednesday, April 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 19900]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10727]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[I.D. 041698E]


Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council; Meetings

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council and the New 
England Fishery Management Council will hold a Joint Dogfish Committee 
meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Friday, May 8, 1998, from 10:00 a.m. 
until 5:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: This meeting will be held at the Holiday Inn Logan Airport, 
225 McLellan Highway, E. Boston, MA; telephone: 617-569-5250.
     Council address: Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 300 S. 
New Street, Dover, DE 19904, telephone: 302-674-2331.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher Moore, Ph.D., Acting 
Executive Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council; telephone: 
302-674-2331, ext. 16.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of this meeting is to establish 
qualifying criteria for limited access permits, adopt the definition of 
overfishing, discuss stock rebuilding strategies, and adopt draft 
management measures.
    Although other issues not contained in this agenda may come before 
this Committee for discussion, in accordance with the Magnuson- Stevens 
Fishery Conservation and Management Act, those issues may not be the 
subject of formal action during this meeting. Action will be restricted 
to those issues specifically identified in the agenda listed in this 
notice.

Special Accommodations

    This meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Joanna Davis at the Mid-Atlantic Council (see 
ADDRESSES) at least 5 days prior to the meeting date.

    Dated: April 16, 1998.
Bruce C. Morehead,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 98-10727 Filed 4-21-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F