alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2019350EN.01000601.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 16.10.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 350/6 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9562 — Alight Solutions/NGA Human Resources)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 350/05)

1.

On 7 October 2019, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2019350EN.01000601-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Tempo Holding Company LLC (‘Alight Solutions’, United States), which is a controlled portfolio company of Blackstone Group Inc. (‘Blackstone’, United States), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | NGA Human Resources (‘NGA’, United Kingdom). |

Alight Solutions acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation indirect sole control of the whole of NGA.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for Blackstone: asset management, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for Alight Solutions: provider of cloud-based human resources (‘HR’) management systems, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for NGA: provider of integrated software, outsourcing and IT technology solutions and services for payroll and HR management. |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2019350EN.01000601-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9562 — Alight Solutions/NGA Human Resources

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2019350EN.01000601-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2019350EN.01000601-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

RANDY D. JACKSON

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 21

- 16

[ June 10, 2021 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County ; Sherwood Bauer, Jr.

, Judge; L.T. Case No s

. 432014CF000041 and 432014CF000119A

.

Randy D. Jackson, Jasper, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

M AY

, C ONNER and A RTAU , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
No. 12-6221.

#### Hitchcock *v.*Tucker, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
# C_2019362EN.01000101.xml

| 28.10.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 362/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.10.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 362/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9575 — Renault/Mobivia/Exadis)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 362/01)

On 17 October 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9575. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9575. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|                                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                          
|View History:                                           
|                                                        
|U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas Imports (Million Cubic Feet) 
|                                                        
|                                                        
|U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas Imports (Million Cubic Feet) 
|                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         | 23,659  | 1,669   | 0       | 17,490  | 42,163 
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 84,193  | 63,596  | 43,116  | 81,685  | 50,778  | 17,918  | 40,274  | 77,778  | 85,453  | 163,430
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 226,036 | 238,126 | 228,730 | 506,519 | 652,015 | 631,260 | 583,537 | 770,812 | 351,698 | 451,957
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 431,010 | 348,939 | 174,649 | 96,859  | 59,275  | 91,511  | 88,367  | 78,011  | 76,451  | 52,903 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 49,214  | 21,587  | 25,268  | 15,239  |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
Exhibit 10.6



Exhibit 10.6



                             VICTORY JUNCTION GANG
        Founded for kids by Kyle and Pattie Petty in honor of Adam Petty



March 6, 2003

Michelle Griffith
Marketing Director
Idigear / innovative designs
223 North Main Street, Suite 1
Pittsburgh, PA  15215

Dear Michelle,

Thank you for selecting the Victory Junction Gang Camp to partner with idigear
in this exciting cause related marketing opportunity. We are looking forward to
a long and successful relationship.

As we discussed, the promotion will involve idigear sleeping bags. The Victory
Junction Gang Camp logo will be used at the point of sale to recognize idigear
as a proud supporter of Victory Junction. I have forwarded the logo via email
for your use in designing the point of sale pieces. Please be sure to allow
Victory Junction to review and approve any copy and artwork before it is
produced. In addition, if your intentions for the use of our logo were to expand
of change, we would request to review these changes as well. Finally, please add
The Victory Junction Gang Camp, Inc. as an additional insured on your liability
policy.

We are thrilled with your commitment of $1 per sleeping bag sold, to be paid to
Victory Junction a quarterly basis with the first payment due following your
third quarter (July 2003). We would like to establish the timeline for the
promotion to begin in April 2003 (anticipated start date) and run through April
31, 2004. At that time, we will review the promotion for renewal.

Please sign the enclosed copy of this letter and return it to Victory Junction.
Feel free to call me if you have any questions or concerns. I can be reached at
336.498.9055 x 23. I look forward to working with you.

Welcome to the Gang!

Best wishes,

/s/ Mary

Mary Barr
Director of Corporate and Foundation Relations



--------------------------------------------------------
I agree to the guidelines set forth in the above letter.



----------------------------               ----------------------------
Mary Barr                                  Michelle Griffith
Victory Junction Gang Camp                 idigear


Founders
Kyle and Pattie Petty
Richard and Lynda Petty
The Bahre Family
Leo Hindery, Jr.
Kyle Petty Charity Ride, Inc.
And thanks to Paul Newman, the salad king of New England.

Executive Director & CEO
Brian Collier

311 Branson Mill Road
Randleman, NC 27317
Office: 336-489-9055
Fax: 336-498-1460
Victoryjunction.org
|                                                                           
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                             
|View History:                                                              
|                                                                           
|No chart available.                                                        
|No chart available.                                                        
|                                                                           
|                                                                           
|Nebraska Nonhydrocarbon Gases Removed from Natural Gas (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | NA     | 0      | NA     | NA     | NA     | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-41109

USDC No. 6:97-CV-617

 

CLYDE J. BURRELL,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF 

CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION,

Respondent-Appellee.

---------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

---------------------

July 21, 1998

Before JOLLY, DAVIS and JONES, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

Clyde J. Burrell, Texas inmate #689253, seeks a certificate

of appealability (COA) to appeal the dismissal of his habeas

petition, a dismissal based upon Burrell’s failure to exhaust his

state-court remedies. IT IS ORDERED that COA is GRANTED and the

case is VACATED AND REMANDED for further proceedings. Clark v.

Williams, 693 F.2d 381, 382 (5th Cir. 1982).

The Texas courts will not entertain a habeas challenge such

as Burrell’s which challenges thirteen prison disciplinary

proceedings. See Ex parte Palomo, 759 S.W.2d 671, 674 (Tex.

Crim. App. 1988); Ex parte Brager, 704 S.W.2d 46, 46 (Tex. Crim.
O R D E R

No. 97-41109

- 2 -

App. 1986). Burrell argues that he sufficiently exhausted his

administrative remedies through the prison grievance system and

that this is sufficient exhaustion. The district court’s

dismissal relied exclusively on the lack of exhaustion through

the presentation of the claims in state court. On remand, the

district court should determine whether Burrell’s habeas

challenge to thirteen disciplinary proceedings has been exhausted

through the prison grievance system and if so, whether the

challenge has merit.

COA GRANTED. VACATED AND REMANDED.
|                                                                        
|------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                          
|View History:                                                           
|                                                                        
|Natural Gas Citygate Price in Vermont  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                        
|                                                                        
|Natural Gas Citygate Price in Vermont  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        | 3.99   | 3.95   | 2.81   | 2.72   | 2.59   | 2.59  
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 2.88   | 2.87   | 2.93   | 2.96   | 3.11   | 2.61   | 2.74   | 2.33   | 2.58   | 2.85  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 4.26   | 4.83   | 4.85   | 5.17   | 5.26   | 6.85   | 8.61   | 10.03  | 10.66  | 9.33  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 8.29   | 7.98   | 6.63   | 6.16   | 7.08   | 6.33   | 5.13   | 5.03   | 4.64   | 3.86  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 3.33   | 4.42   | 6.26   | 5.41   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
##### 



Certifications Furnished Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    The quarterly report on form 10-Q of ADC Telecommunications, Inc. for the period ended
February 2, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof,
fully complies with the requirements of sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the above-mentioned report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ADC Telecommunications, Inc.
 /s/ Robert E. SwitzRobert E. SwitzMarch 12, 2007/s/ Gokul V. HemmadyGokul V. HemmadyMarch 12, 2007 27
Exhibit 31(d)

Certifications of the CFO

Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Cynthia J. Devine, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of Tim Hortons Inc.; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 31, 2010



/s/ CYNTHIA J. DEVINEName: Cynthia J. DevineTitle: Chief Financial Officer
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2019185EN.01002101.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 29.5.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 185/21 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9205 — IBM/Red Hat)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 185/11)

1.

On 20 May 2019, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2019185EN.01002101-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | International Business Machines Corporation (‘IBM’, USA), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Red Hat Inc. (‘Red Hat’, USA). |

IBM acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Red Hat. The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for IBM: development, production, and marketing of a wide variety of information technology (‘IT’) solutions, namely enterprise IT software and systems (such as servers, storage systems, cloud, and cognitive offerings) and IT implementation services (such as business consulting and IT infrastructure services),

—   for Red Hat: supply of open-source software and support services, using a community-powered approach to develop and offer a wider range of open-source software solutions for enterprise customers.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9205 — IBM/Red Hat

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2019185EN.01002101-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

---
Exhibit 32.01**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the yearly report on Form 10-KSB of First United Ethanol, LLC (the“Company”) for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Anthony J, Flagg, Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.         /s/ Steve Collins   Steve Collins, Treasurer   *(Principal Financial andAccounting Officer)*