alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Francis I. duPont & Co., Appellant, *v.*Ronald Chelednik, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

September 20, 1971.

*Grandefeld & Goodman (Mortimer Goodman*of counsel), for appellant. *Joseph A. Byrne, Jr.,*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

Plaintiff is a stock brokerage firm with offices in Manhattan. Defendant, a resident of New Jersey, was one of plaintiff’s customers and traded on New York stock exchanges through plaintiff. On July 24,1969, plaintiff erroneously placed certain securities in defendant’s account. Defendant, with knowledge of the mistake, did not notify plaintiff of the error, and, in December of that year, directed plaintiff to sell the securities for his account. In January of 1970, plaintiff forwarded to defendant its check for $4,688.22 to cover the proceeds of the sale. The error was discovered in April of 1970, but, when return of the money, plus intervening dividends, was demanded, defendant refused to do so. Served with the summons and complaint in New Jérsey, defendant moved to dismiss the action on the ground that the Civil Court did not have jurisdiction of the person of defendant. The motion was granted; on reargument, the original decision was adhered to.

*363The complaint sounds in tort as well as in contract. CPLR 302 authorizes the courts of this State to exercise personal jurisdiction over a nondomiciliary if he commits a tortious act within the State (other than defamation of character). The allegations in the complaint that defendant knowingly permitted the securities to remain in his account without notifying plaintiff, and, with the intent to defraud plaintiff, instructed plaintiff to sell the securities for defendant’s account, are sufficient to bring defendant within the ambit of1 this provision.

Furthermore, operation of the account in New York constituted the transaction of business in New York. One need not be physically present in New York to be subject to the jurisdiction of our courts under CPLR 302. One *11*can engage in extensive purposeful activity here without .ever actually setting foot in the State ’ ’ *(Parke-Bernet Galleries*v. *Franklyn,*26 N Y 2d *13,*17).

Appeal from order dated November 18, 1970, dismissed without costs, such order having been superseded by the order dated December 9, 1970. Order dated December 9, 1970, modified by denying defendant’s motion to dismiss, and, as modified, affirmed, with $10 costs to appellant. Judgment reversed, "without costs.

Concur — Markowitz, J. P., Streit and Quirk, JJ.

Order modified, etc.
**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**WELLSTAR      INTERNATIONAL, INC.**

**FORM      10-KSB FOR THE YEAR ENDED JULY 31, 2007**

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|  | 1. | The                Annual Report on Form 10-KSB (the “Annual Report”) of the Company for the                year ended July 31, 2007, which this certification accompanies (the                "Annual Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section                13(a) of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. | The                information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of                the Company. |
|--|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                      |   |                                          |   |
|-------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------|--------|
| Dated:                  November 13, 2007 | By:    | */s/              Howard Bielski*             |   |
|                                      |   | Name:              Howard Bielski             |   |
|                                      |   | Title:                Chief Financial Officer |   |
|                                      |   |                                          |   |
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

TYREE LAWSON,

Petitioner

v.

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF

MONTGOMERY COUNTY,

PENNSYLVANIA, JUDGE WILLIAM R.

CARPENTER,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 58 MM 2022

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 6 th day of October , 2022, the Application for Leave to File Original

Process is GRANTED, and the “Petition for Assumption of Jurisdiction” is DENIED. The

Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.
#### State v. Reed

108,823

07/02/2015

Granted in part; summarily vacated in part; remanded to Ct. of App.

Unpublished
407P15-2

#### State v. Larry Ricardo Tart

Def’s *Pro Se*Motion for Certificate of Appealability

Dismissed
|                                                                                            
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                              
|View History:                                                                               
|                                                                                            
|Natural Gas Delivered to Consumers in Arizona (Including Vehicle Fuel)  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                            
|                                                                                            
|Natural Gas Delivered to Consumers in Arizona (Including Vehicle Fuel)  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |         | 116,058 | 138,724 | 146,471
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 184,542 | 218,613 | 230,493 | 254,720 | 333,746 | 304,004 | 337,429 | 372,536 | 376,961 | 348,877
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 315,448 | 275,627 | 319,685 | 319,450 | 293,221 | 336,030 | 346,864 | 308,801 | 372,412 | 453,325
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 483,085 | 452,868 | 438,548 | NA      |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
# C_2019015EN.01000301.xml

| 14.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 15/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 15/3

---

Notice concerning the anti-subsidy measures in force on imports of certain rainbow trout originating in Turkey: change of name of a company subject to the countervailing duty rate for cooperating non-sampled companies

(2019/C 15/03)

Imports of certain rainbow trout originating in Turkey are subject to a definitive countervailing duty, imposed by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/309 (1).

Abalıoğlu Yem-Soya Ve Tekstil San A.Ş., TARIC (2) additional code B968, a company subject to the countervailing duty rate for cooperating non-sampled companies of 7,6 %, informed the Commission that it had changed its name to Lezita Balik A.Ş.

The company asked the Commission to confirm that the change of name does not affect the right of the company to benefit from the duty rate applied to the company under its previous name.

The Commission examined the information supplied and concluded that the change of name in no way affects the findings of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/309.

Therefore, the references in the Annex to Regulation (EU) 2015/309 to:

| Abalıoğlu Yem-Soya Ve Tekstil San A.Ş. | B968 |
| --- | --- |

Abalıoğlu Yem-Soya Ve Tekstil San A.Ş.

B968

should be read as:

| Lezita Balik A.Ş. | B968 |
| --- | --- |

Lezita Balik A.Ş.

B968

The TARIC additional code B968, previously attributed to the cooperating non-sampled company Abalıoğlu Yem-Soya Ve Tekstil San A.Ş., shall apply to Lezita Balik A.Ş.

---

(1)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/309 of 26 February 2015 imposing a definitive countervailing duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on certain rainbow trout originating in Turkey, OJ L 56, 27.2.2015, p. 12.

(2)  The integrated Tariff of the European Union.

---
### (Http://Www.dji.com/) Store (Http://Store.dji.com/) Products (Http://Www.dji.com/Products) ∠ DJI Events (Http://Event.dji.com) ∠ Support(Http://Www.dji.com/Support) Community ∠ Fly Safe (Http://Flysafe.dji.com) 

## " United States 

# (http://www.dji.com/product/spreading-wings-s800-evo) Overview(Http://Www.dji.com/Product/Spreading-Wings-S800-Evo) Features (Http://Www.dji.com/Product/Spreading-Wings-S800-Evo/Feature)

Specs(Http://Www.dji.com/Product/Spreading-Wings-S800-Evo/Spec) Videos (Http://Www.dji.com/Product/Spreading-Wings-S800-Evo/Video) Downloads(Http://Www.dji.com/Product/Spreading-Wings-S800-Evo/Download) FAQ (Http://Www.dji.com/Product/Spreading-Wings-S800-Evo/Faq) Wiki (Http://Wiki.dji.com/En/Index.php/Spreading_Wings_S800_EVO) Buy From Dealers(/Product/Spreading-Wings-S800-Evo/Dealer)



### Size and Weight

Frame Diagonal Wheelbase Diagonal Wheelbase 800mm Frame Arm Length Frame Arm Length 350mm Frame Arm Weight Frame Arm Weight (Including Motor, ESC, Propeller ) (Including Motor, ESC, Propeller ) 356g Center Frame Diameter Center Frame Diameter 240mm Center Frame Weight Center Frame Weight 550g Landing Gear Size Landing Gear Size 460mm(Length) × 425mm(Width) × 320mm(Height) (Top width: 155mm) Search dji.com... 

### #

### Flight Parameters

Motor

ESC

Foldable Propeller(1552) Retractable Landing Gear Weight(Including Battery Retractable Landing Gear Weight(Including Battery Tray) Tray) 1050g
Takeo ff Weight Takeo ff Weight 6.0Kg ~ 8.0Kg Total Weight Total Weight 3.7Kg Power Battery Power Battery LiPo (6S 、 10000mAh~15000mAh 、 15C(Min)) Max Power Consumption Max Power Consumption 3000W Hover Power Consumption Hover Power Consumption 800W(@ Takeo ff Weight 6.7Kg) Hover Time Hover Time Max: 20 min (@15000mAh&6.7Kg Takeo ff Weight) Stator Size Stator Size 41 × 14mm KV KV 400rpm/V Max Power Max Power 500W Weight(With Cooling Fan) Weight(With Cooling Fan) 158g Current Current 40A OPTO Voltage Voltage 6S LiPo Signal Frequency Signal Frequency 30Hz ~ 450Hz Drive PWM Frequency Drive PWM Frequency 8KHz Weight(With Radiators) Weight(With Radiators) 35g Material Material Engineering plastic Size Size 15 × 5.2 inch Weight Weight 13g
About DJI (http://www.dji.com/company) Contact DJI (http://www.dji.com/contact) News (http://www.dji.com/info) Media Coverage (http://www.dji.com/info/media-coverage) Showcase (http://www.dji.com/showcase) DJI University(http://edu.dji.com/) Careers(http://we.dji.com/en.html) DJI Wiki (http://wiki.dji.com/en) After-sales Service Policies(http://www.dji.com/service) DJI Developer(https://developer.dji.com/) (http://www.dji.com/) Copyright © 2015 DJI All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy (http://www.dji.com/policy) Terms of Use (http://www.dji.com/terms)
S94A1239.

#### BARTLETT v. CALDWELL et al.

(452 SE2d 744)

Decided January 17, 1995

Reconsideration denied February 21, 1995.

Jerel H. Bartlett, *pro se.*

*Johnnie L. Caldwell, District Attorney, Michael J. Bowers, Attorney General, Daryl A. Robinson, John C. Jones, Senior Assistant*
      *53
      *Attorneys General, Hendrix & Smith, Newton M. Galloway,*for ap-pellees.

*52Hunt, Chief Justice.

Jerel Herschel Bartlett asked the magistrate to issue an arrest warrant against Deborah Ann Horning for false swearing in connection with an affidavit she submitted in their ongoing divorce action. The magistrate denied the warrant application. Subsequently, Bartlett filed a petition for writ of mandamus against the magistrate and the district attorney, who had indicated that he did not prosecute false swearing cases, seeking to compel Horning’s arrest for false swearing. The superior court denied the writ of mandamus. Bartlett appeals, and we affirm.

A magistrate has discretion to determine whether or not probable cause exists for the issuance of an arrest warrant, and mandamus will not lie to compel the magistrate to perform this discretionary act unless a gross abuse of discretion has been shown. *Chisholm v. Cofer,*264 Ga. 512 (448 SE2d 369) (1994). The magistrate court exercised its discretion in refusing to issue the warrant and that refusal was not an abuse of discretion. Id.

Further, Bartlett does not have standing to challenge the district attorney’s decision not to prosecute.

> A citizen does not have a judicially cognizable interest in the prosecution or nonprosecution of another and, hence, lacks standing to contest the prosecuting authority’s policies when the citizen is neither prosecuted nor threatened with prosecution. [Cit.]

*Scanlon v. State Bar of Ga.,*264 Ga. 251, 253 (443 SE2d 830) (1994). *Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.*
#### May v. Kansas Dept. of Corrections

111,979

07/27/2015

Denied.

Unpublished
#### Keiswetter v. State

110,610

10/07/2015

Granted.

Unpublished
EXHIBIT 12  Madison Gas and Electric Company Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 (In thousands)   EarningsNet income before minority interest$14,223Equity earnings2,186Income distribution from equity investees1,693Minority interest in pretax income(5,300)Amortization of capitalized interest65Interest capitalized678Federal and state income taxes8,292Fixed charges4,445Total Earnings as Defined$26,282Fixed ChargesInterest expense on long-term debt and other$3,930Interest on rentals*1,013Amortization of debt issuance costs157AFUDC - borrowed funds23Capitalized interest(678)Total Fixed Charges$4,445Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges5.91X  *Management believes that using one-third of the total rental expense gives a reasonable approximation for actual interest on rentals.
|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                      
|View History:                                                       
|                                                                    
|Texas Natural Gas Underground Storage Capacity  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                    
|                                                                    
|Texas Natural Gas Underground Storage Capacity  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |         |         | 590,248 | 589,780
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 586,502 | 589,018 | 595,229 | 598,782 | 627,589 | 653,420 | 672,533 | 683,891 | 684,226 | 684,226
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 699,323 | 686,000 | 699,471 | 662,593 | 674,196 | 680,096 | 690,061 | 690,678 | 740,477 | 766,768
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 783,579 | 812,394 | 831,190 | 842,072 | 834,124 | 834,965 | 854,469 | 853,043 | 845,081 | 845,081
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 847,640 | 847,485 | 860,268 |         |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
EXHIBIT 31.3



Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14 and 15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934





I, Gary J. Wolter, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Madison Gas and Electric Company;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; and



b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial; and



b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.







/s/ Gary J. Wolter

Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: November 8, 2005
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Randall Fernandez, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of Deltron, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal period ended September 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.   /s/ Randall Fernandez  Name: Randall Fernandez Title: Chief Executive and Financial Officer Date: March 4, 2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<MULTIPLIER>        1000

<S>                           <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             Mar-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                Apr-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                  Jun-30-1999
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<CASH>                        9153
<SECURITIES>                  1122
<RECEIVABLES>                 121672
<ALLOWANCES>                  5966
<INVENTORY>                   59628
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              202258
<PP&E>                        113805
<DEPRECIATION>                51576
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                529992
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         133314
<BONDS>                       236599
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<COMMON>                      39413
<OTHER-SE>                    115498
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  529992
<SALES>                       119067
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              119067
<CGS>                         58474
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 103802
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              45328
<LOSS-PROVISION>              (39)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            5497
<INCOME-PRETAX>               15265
<INCOME-TAX>                  5266
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           9999
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  9999
<EPS-BASIC>                 0.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                 0.39


</TABLE>