alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                             
|-------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                               
|View History:                                                
|                                                             
|U.S. Natural Gas Industrial Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                             
|                                                             
|U.S. Natural Gas Industrial Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0    | Year-1    | Year-2    | Year-3    | Year-4    | Year-5    | Year-6    | Year-7    | Year-8    | Year-9   
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | ---------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |           |           |           |           |           |           |           | 8,510,879 | 8,320,407 | 8,079,359
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 8,142,240 | 7,344,219 | 7,527,184 | 7,150,396 | 7,256,408 | 6,601,168 | 6,526,546 | 6,654,716 | 6,670,182 | 6,167,371
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 6,826,192 | 6,994,120 | 7,226,215 | 7,425,452 | 7,646,039 | 7,521,903 | 7,728,688 | 7,943,018 | 8,417,300 | 8,416,660
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 8,212,977 | 8,374,672 | 8,536,882 | 8,537,902 |           |           |           |           |           |          
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 4/30/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 5/31/2024
EXHIBIT 99.15


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of Ruby Mining Co. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned,
Herbert C. Leeming, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Murray D.
Bradley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
          the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

By:

/s/ Herbert C. Leeming
-----------------------------
Herbert C. Leeming
Chief Executive Officer
April 15, 2003

/s/ Murray D. Bradley
-----------------------------
Murray D. Bradley
Chief Financial Officer
April 15, 2003
DanOdom, 

Aviation Safety Inspector 

Anchorage, Alaska CHDO 

Dear Dan Odom, 

P E G A S U S --... ---- -.-:~~,,v;.,_ ___ _ ' ' 

AVIATION SERVICES 

An Akima Company 

Pegasus Aviation Services, LLC (Air Agency Certificate Number UPUR695X and Certificated 

Satellite Repair Station UPUD695X) would like to submit this petition for an exemption from 

FAR Part 145, § 145.103(b ); which states, "A certificated repair station with an airframe rating 

must provide suitable permanent housing to enclose the largest type and model of aircraft listed 

on its operations specifications. 

Pegasus Aviation Services, LLC (PMX) would like this petition to cover the primary Certificated 

Repair Station (CRS) in Anchorage Alaska as well as any current or future D107 or Satellite 

Repair Station Locations. 

PMX's current Operations Specifications grant a limited airframe and power plant rating so PMX 

may provide line maintenance, transit maintenance, and "A checks" for our customers. The nature 

of these transits include a short ground time with just enough time to provide crew transfer, 

fueling of the aircraft, and cargo movement as required. Due to the tight schedule in which our 

customers operate, any required line maintenance is expected to be performed at the aircraft 

parking location, which can vary on the airfield, allowing the other contracted services to be 

completed during maintenance. In the fifteen years ofPMX's existence, hanger maintenance has 

not been an issue due to the fact that Pegasus has the required equipment to ensure article 

protection and segregation as required from the elements and environment, while ensuring 

maintenance accuracy, per Federal Aviation Regulations as well as the Regulations imposed by 

our customer's Authorities, in challenging work environments. PMX has temporary structures, 

heating units and storage equipment to ensure all maintenance is performed safely and securely in 

compliance with required regulations. The temporary structures mentioned can be used to both 

protect the articles being maintained and the Technicians performing the work to prevent 

impaired maintenance per the customer's Continuous Airworthiness Maintenance Program 

(CAMP) and PMX's Repair Station Manual (RSM) and Quality System Manual (QSM) 

especially during the longer ground times required for "A checks." 

It is in the public's interest to allow this exemption as doing so will allow our customer's to 

operate in accordance with their maintenance programs at the outstation locations that PMX 

operates. 

Best 

~ 

Regards, 

Kellon Borden 

Quality System Manager & Director of Training 

Pegasus Aviation Services, LLC. 

KELLON.BORDEN@PEGASUSANC.COM PHONE: 907-243-3144 

3901 W. OLD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT RD. • ANCHORAGE, AK 99502 USA
#### Fagan v. Kansas Dept. of Corrections

108,288

08/19/13

Denied.

Unpublished
165P16

#### State v. Simaron Demetrius Hill

1. Def’s *Pro Se*Petition for *Writ of Mandamus*

*2.*Defs *Pro Se*Motion for Peremptory Setting

1. Dismissed

2. Dismissed as moot
#### State v. Jones

112,666

09/08/2015

Denied

Unpublished
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,228
<SECURITIES>                                    92,372
<RECEIVABLES>                                   54,423
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,475
<INVENTORY>                                     48,157
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               201,816
<PP&E>                                         399,718
<DEPRECIATION>                                  74,476
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 586,700
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           59,804
<BONDS>                                         50,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,090
<OTHER-SE>                                     305,277
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   586,700
<SALES>                                        277,229
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               288,983
<CGS>                                          172,613
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  212,868
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,135
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 72,980
<INCOME-TAX>                                    24,813
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             48,167
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    48,167
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.52
        

</TABLE>
|                                                                                              
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                
|View History:                                                                                 
|                                                                                              
|Colorado Natural Gas Price Sold to Electric Power Consumers  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                              
|                                                                                              
|Colorado Natural Gas Price Sold to Electric Power Consumers  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 3.16   | 2.98   | 2.65  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 4.12   | 3.81   | 2.53   | 4.42   | 5.65   | 7.41   | 6.22   | 4.35   | 7.02   | 4.27  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 5.16   | 4.98   | W      | W      | 5.49   | 3.79   | W      | W      | W      | W     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | W      | W      | W      | W      |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
906 CERTIFICATIONS: CEO AND CFO



 



EXHIBIT 10.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. – PETROBRAS (the “Company”),
does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:



The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2002 of the
Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.




	 	 	 
	 

        Date: June 19, 2003	 	/s/ JOSÉ EDUARDO DE BARROS DUTRA





José Eduardo de Barros Dutra

Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.










 


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. – PETROBRAS (the “Company”),
does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:



The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2002 of the
Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.




	 	 	 
	 

        Date: June 19, 2003	 	/s/ JOSÉ SÉRGIO GABRIELLI DE AZEVEDO





José Sérgio Gabrielli de Azevedo

Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
## SPE Abstract 126935

Sampling and Interpretation of Ground water Properties Near the Scurry Area Canyon Reef Operators Committee (SACROC) CO 2 

## -Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) Field in West Texas

R.C. Smith, K.D. Romanak, C. Yang, and S. Hovorka, University of Texas at Austin

This abstract was prepared for presentation at the 2009 SPE International Conference on CO 2 Capture, Storage, and Utilization held in San Diego, California, USA, 2–4 November 2009.

This abstract was selected for presentation by an SPE program committee following review of information submitted by the author (s). Contents have not been reviewed by the Society of Petroleum Engineers and are subject to correction by the author(s). The material does not necessarily reflect any position of t he Society of Petroleum Engineers, its officers, or members.

Abstract

The BEG SACROC water study is the first comprehensive research project with application to Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) that is focused on collection and interp retation of field measurements of groundwater (water level and water chemistry data). CO 2 has been injected for EOR at the SACROC oilfield since 1972. We collected data during five sampling trips between July 2007 and November 2008 and incorporated historical data from the Texas Water Development Board (TWDB) database, dating as far back as 1956, into analysis of potential impacts to water quality in Scurry County. There are no systematic impacts to freshwater resources overlying, or in the vicinity of SACROC oilfield, resulting from CO 2 injection. Quality of the Dockum aquifer, which is the primary source of drinking and irrigation water in Scurry County, TX, overlying SACROC is not statistically different from water quality in the region. There are impacts to Dockum aquifer quality in isolated areas of SACROC that are probably a result of outdated (pre-1970's and therefore pre- CO 2 injection) oilfield practices, and accidental release of co-produced brine from leaking wells or pipelines.

BEG researchers are still looking for indications of increased CO 2 concentrations in the Dockum aquifer overlying (50 to 500 ft depths) SACROC as a result of deep (6,000 to 7,000 ft) CO 2 injection. CO 2 occurs naturally in aquifers as a result of processes such as dissoluti on of aquifer matrix and microbial degradation of organic material. To date, we have employed analysis of natural tr acers and rock-water interaction to identify injectateCO 2 in the Dockum aquifer and results are inconclusive. We continue to perform additional sampling and analysis to evaluate if injectate- CO 2 has been introduced into the Dockum aquifer overlying SACROC. Further work including fluid sampling of intermediate depth (3,000 to 4,000 ft) zones and additional tracers (noble gases, strontium, and possibly sulfur isotop es) is planned for July 2009.

This work has been funded by the US Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory under the Southwest Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership pr ogram (Brian McPherson, PI), administered by New Mexico Tech. Industrial sponsors are Kinder Morgan CO 2 Company and Schlumberger.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2019076EN.01001401.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 76/14 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9291 — Apollo Management/RPC Group)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 76/06)

1.

On 21 February 2019, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2019076EN.01001401-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Apollo Management L.P. (‘Apollo’, US), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | RPC Group plc (‘RPC’, UK). |

Apollo acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of RPC.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares, by means of a court-sanctioned scheme of arrangement.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for Apollo: a global investment fund,

—   for RPC: manufacturing of plastic products, including packaging and non-packaging.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2019076EN.01001401-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9291 — Apollo Management/RPC Group

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2019076EN.01001401-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2019076EN.01001401-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 74 (Friday, April 17, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 19262]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10212]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-1212-DR]


Minnesota; Amendment No. 2 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of Minnesota, (FEMA-1212-DR), dated April 1, 1998, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 3, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madge Dale, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3260.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster for the State 
of Minnesota, is hereby amended to include the following areas among 
those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the 
catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of April 1, 1998:

    Cottonwood County for Individual Assistance and Categories A and 
B under the Public Assistance program.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community 
Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis 
Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression 
Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 
83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 
83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program)
Lacy E. Suiter,
Executive Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 98-10212 Filed 4-16-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lynch Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ralph
R. Papitto, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Raymond H. Keller,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

/s/ RALPH R. PAPITTO
/s/ RAYMOND H. KELLER

Ralph R. Papitto
Chief Executive OfficerMay 7, 2003

Raymond H. Keller
Chief Financial OfficerMay 7, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Lynch Corporation and will be retained by Lynch Corporation
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.