alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
January28,1976

The Honorable Fratis L. Duff Director Opinion No. H-773 Texas Department of Health Resources Austin, Texas 76756 Re: Entitlement of Board of Health Resources members to per diem allowance. Dear Doctor Duff: You have requested our opinion regarding the entitlement of,members of the Board of Health Resources to per diem payments. Specifically,you inquirewhether articles 4416a and 4417a,V.T.C.S., permit per diem paymentswhen less than a quorum of the Board is convened. You have indicated that your concern is directed to committeemeetings and other similarmeetings designed to be attendedby less than a quorum of the full Board. You also ask whether per diem payments are authorizedwhen a quorum of the Board meets at a place other than Austin. Article 4416a, as recently amended,provides in pertinent part:

A majority of themembers of the Texas Board of Health Resources constitute a ..* quorum for the transactionof business. The Board shallmeet at Austin at least once eachmonth, on dates to be fixedby the Board, and shallhold such special meetings as may be calledby the Chair-~ man. . . .

p.3268The Honorable Fratis L. Duff - page two W-773)

Article 44lJa, as recently amended,provides in pertinent part: The members of the Texas Board of

Health Resources receiveno fixed salary, but eachmember shallbe allowed, for each and every day in attending the meetings of the Board, the sum of $50, 'andsaid members shallbe allowed traveling and other necessary expenseswhile in the performanceof official duty.
. . . Article 4417a authorizespayment of the sum of $50 for each day a member attends the meetin s of the Board. ' +eToZZPTFEFpur~Z!Z opinion, a meeting is a "meetrng 0 of article 4417a, only when it is a meeting designed to be attendedby the entiremembership of then Board. Thus, a committeemeeting or an informalgathering of several members would not constitutea meeting of the Board. As to your second question, it is our opinion that per diem payments are authorizedwhen the Boardmeets at a place other than'

Austin. Although article 4416a contemplates that the reqular'monthlymeetings of the Board shall be held at Austin, it also permits the Board to "hold such special meetings as may be called by the Chairman." The Act does not specificallyrequire that such specialmeetings be held at Austin. So long as the "specialmeeting" is one which is designed to be attendedby all Board members, we believe that payment of the per diem allowance is authorized. SUMMARY A per diem allowancemay be paid to members of the Board of Health Resources only for thosemeetings designed to be attendedby all members of the Board. The per diem allowance may be paid for all suchmeetings.

Attorney General of Texas

p. 3269The Honorable Fratis L. Duff - page three (H-773)

APPROVED:

Opinion Committee jwb

p. 3270
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 75 (Monday, April 20, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 19492]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10361]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-1209-DR]


Georgia; Amendment to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of Georgia (FEMA-1209-DR), dated March 11, 1998, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 8, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madge Dale, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3260.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster for the State 
of Georgia is hereby amended to include the following areas among those 
areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe 
declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of March 
11, 1998:

    Baldwin, Clayton, Cobb, Effingham, Forsyth, Fulton, Jones, 
Liberty, Lowndes, Newton and Twiggs Counties for Individual 
Assistance.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community 
Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis 
Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression 
Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 
83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 
83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program)
Lacy E. Suiter,
Executive Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 98-10361 Filed 4-17-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Gencor Industries, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|/s/ E.J. Elliott                          
|E.J. Elliott                              
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer      
|                                          
|February 16, 2010                         
|                                          
|/s/ L. Ray Adams                          
|L. Ray Adams                              
|Principal Financial and Accounting Officer

February 16,
2010



20
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,043,940
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,052,848
<ALLOWANCES>                                    57,431
<INVENTORY>                                  1,795,001
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,018,247
<PP&E>                                       3,047,415
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,429,841
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,044,591
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          675,780
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        37,839
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,454,154
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,044,591
<SALES>                                      1,342,916
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,342,916
<CGS>                                          817,236
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,204,516
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (30,932)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (19,391)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                149,941
<INCOME-TAX>                                    50,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             99,941
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    99,941
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lynch Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Ralph R. Papitto, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Raymond H.
Keller, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
             15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
             material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
             of the Company.



/s/ Ralph R. Papitto
/s/ Raymond H. Keller


Ralph R. Papitto
Chief Executive Officer
November 4, 2002



Raymond H. Keller
Chief Financial Officer
November 4, 2002
# C_2019352EN.01001101.xml

| 18.10.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 352/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.10.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 352/11

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9464 — OMERS/Altice/Allianz/SFR FTTH)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 352/11)

On 16 September 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9464. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9464. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 72 (Tuesday, April 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 18333]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-9870]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

``FEDERAL REGISTER'' CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: 62 F.R. 16563.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF MEETING: 10:30 a.m., Monday, 
April 28, 1997.

CHANGES IN THE MEETING: The Commodity Futures Trading Commission has 
changed the time of the closed meeting to discuss Enforcement Quarterly 
Objectives to 11:00 a.m.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 97-9870 Filed 4-11-97; 2:35 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 76 (Tuesday, April 21, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19714-19715]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10411]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


University of Nebraska-Lincoln; Notice of Decision on Application 
for Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Instrument

    This decision is made pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, 
Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-
651, 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). Related records can be viewed 
between 8:30 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. in Room 4211, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, 14th and Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C.
    Docket Number: 97-102. Applicant: University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 
Lincoln, NE 68588-0347. Instrument: Scanning Acoustic Microscope, Model 
KSI SAM 2000. Manufacturer: Kramer Scientific Instruments, Germany.

[[Page 19715]]

Intended Use: See notice at 63 FR 5364, February 2, 1998.
    Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. No instrument of 
equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument, for such 
purposes as it is intended to be used, is being manufactured in the 
United States. Reasons: The foreign instrument provides micron-scale 
resolution using operation at 1.0 GHz for local stiffness analysis of 
materials. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration advised 
March 26, 1998 that (1) this capability is pertinent to the applicant's 
intended purpose and (2) it knows of no domestic instrument or 
apparatus of equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument for 
the applicant's intended use.
    We know of no other instrument or apparatus of equivalent 
scientific value to the foreign instrument which is being manufactured 
in the United States.
Frank W. Creel,
Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff.
[FR Doc. 98-10411 Filed 4-20-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
#### State v. Aguero-Aguilar

109,907

07/21/2015

Denied. ..

Unpublished
|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                      
|View History:                                                       
|                                                                    
|Iowa Natural Gas Industrial Price  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                    
|                                                                    
|Iowa Natural Gas Industrial Price  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 4.11   | 3.49   | 3.98  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 5.49   | 6.48   | 5.58   | 6.50   | 7.33   | 9.46   | 8.47   | 8.56   | 9.32   | 6.23  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 6.10   | 5.78   | 4.70   | 5.43   | 7.59   | 5.30   | 4.70   | 5.21   | 5.37   | 4.30  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 4.48   | 7.08   | 8.66   | 6.83   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
IV 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 16 

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the Greater Washington 

Soap Box Derby. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 9, 2011 

Mr. HOYER (for himself, Mr. CONNOLLY of Virginia, Ms. EDWARDS, Mr. 

MORAN, Ms. NORTON, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, and Mr. WOLF) submitted the 

following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

Transportation and Infrastructure 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the Greater 

Washington Soap Box Derby. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR SOAP BOX 

4 DERBY RACES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Greater Washington Soap 

6 Box Derby Association (in this resolution referred to as 

7 the ‘‘sponsor’’) shall be permitted to sponsor a public 

8 event, soap box derby races (in this resolution referred to 

9 as the ‘‘event’’), on the Capitol Grounds. 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HCON 16 IH 

1 (b) DATE OF EVENT.—The event shall be held on 

2 June 18, 2011, or on such other date as the Speaker of 

3 the House of Representatives and the Committee on Rules 

4 and Administration of the Senate jointly designate. 

5 SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Under conditions to be prescribed 

7 by the Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police 

8 Board, the event shall be— 

9 (1) free of admission charge and open to the 

10 public; and 

11 (2) arranged not to interfere with the needs of 

12 Congress. 

13 (b) EXPENSES AND LIABILITIES.—The sponsor shall 

14 assume full responsibility for all expenses and liabilities 

15 incident to all activities associated with the event. 

16 SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS. 

17 Subject to the approval of the Architect of the Cap18 itol, the sponsor is authorized to erect upon the Capitol 

19 Grounds such stage, sound amplification devices, and 

20 other related structures and equipment as may be required 

21 for the event. 

22 SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS. 

23 The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police 

24 Board are authorized to make such additional arrange25 ments as may be required to carry out the event. 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HCON 16 IH 

1 SEC. 5. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS. 

2 The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforce3 ment of the restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of 

4 title 40, United States Code, concerning sales, advertise5 ments, displays, and solicitations on the Capitol Grounds, 

6 as well as other restrictions applicable to the Capitol 

7 Grounds, with respect to the event. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
No. 12-6369.

#### Borrero-Rodriguez *v.*United States.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### State v. King

109,443

06/29/2015

Denied

Unpublished
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

May 21, 2013

No. 04

- 13

- 0 0266

- CR

IN RE Juan MORENO

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

On May 10, 2013, Relator Juan Moreno filed a motion for rehearing . T he motion for

rehearing is DENIED.

It is so ORDERED on May 21, 2013

.

_____________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 21 st day of May, 2013

.

_____________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2009CR8686D, styled State of Texas v. Juan Moren o , pending in

the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Ron Rangel presiding.
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2013 - 0689 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 2009 - SW - 015 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **:** 

### Robert Grant **Date**

**B ranch Manager**  **Date**
No. 12-5943.

#### Kou Cha *v.*Cate, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.