alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's Statement of Operations and Balance Sheet and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,952
<SECURITIES>                                     6,402
<RECEIVABLES>                                   49,695
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,402
<INVENTORY>                                     64,085
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               121,542
<PP&E>                                       1,808,619
<DEPRECIATION>                                  29,716
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,029,986
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           76,623
<BONDS>                                        930,550
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           183
<OTHER-SE>                                     313,283
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,029,986
<SALES>                                        174,958
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               179,064
<CGS>                                          111,371
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  144,810
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              32,183
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,071
<INCOME-TAX>                                       670
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,401
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,401
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.08


</TABLE>
You are here: EPA Home Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention Pollution Prevention & 

Toxics AEGLs 2,4-Toluene Diisocyanate Result 

2,4-Toluene Diisocyanate Results

Technical Support Document

2,4-Toluene Diisocyanate 584-84-9 (Final)

ppm

10 min 30 min 60 min 4 hr 8 hr

AEGL 1 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.010 0.010 

AEGL 2 0.24 0.17 0.083 0.021 0.021 

AEGL 3 0.65 0.65 0.51 0.32 0.16 

Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) 

http://www.epa.gov/oppt/aegl/pubs/results47.htm

Last updated on Wednesday, January 11, 2012

2,4-Toluene Diisocyanate Results | Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) | US EPA Page 1 of 1

http://www.epa.gov/oppt/aegl/pubs/results47.htm 5/8/2014
You are here: EPA Home Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention Pollution Prevention & 

Toxics AEGLs 2,6-Toluenediisocyanate Results 

2,6-Toluenediisocyanate Results

Technical Support Document

2,6-Toluenediisocyanate 91-08-7 (Final)

ppm

10 min 30 min 60 min 4 hr 8 hr

AEGL 1 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.010 0.010 

AEGL 2 0.24 0.17 0.083 0.021 0.021 

AEGL 3 0.65 0.65 0.51 0.32 0.16 

Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) 

http://www.epa.gov/oppt/aegl/pubs/results24.htm

Last updated on Wednesday, January 11, 2012

2,6-Toluenediisocyanate Results | Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) | US EPA Page 1 of 1

http://www.epa.gov/oppt/aegl/pubs/results24.htm 5/8/2014
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 74 (Friday, April 17, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 19273]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10196]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[UTU-69025]


Utah; Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease

April 13, 1998.
    In accordance with Title IV of the Federal Oil and Gas Royalty 
Management Act (P.L. 97-451), a petition for reinstatement of oil and 
gas lease UTU-69025 for lands in Uintah County, Utah, was timely filed 
and required rentals accruing from May 1, 1997, the date of 
termination, have been paid.
    The lessee has agreed to new lease terms for rentals and royalties 
at rates of $10 per acre and 16\2/3\ percent, respectively. The $500 
administrative fee has been paid and the lessee has reimbursed the 
Bureau of Land Management for the cost of publishing this notice.
    Having met all the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as 
set out in Section 31 (d) and (e) of the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920 
(30 U.S.C. 188), the Bureau of Land Management is proposing to 
reinstate lease UTU-69025, effective May 1, 1997, subject to the 
original terms and conditions of the lease and the increased rental and 
royalty rates cited above.
Robert Lopez,
Group Leader, Minerals Adjudication Group.
[FR Doc. 98-10196 Filed 4-16-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-DQ-M
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Safeco Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-K”),I, Ross J. Kari, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and 

(2) The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Date: February 26, 2008 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Safeco Corporation and will be retained by Safeco Corporationand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.4  Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002   In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Madison Gas and Electric Company for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, Terry A. Hanson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    /s/ Terry A. Hanson Terry A. Hanson Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary Date: August 7, 2007
#### State v. Moore

109,787

10/07/2015

Denied

Unpublished
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 117 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 117

   Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the National Peace 
                      Officers' Memorial Service.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 19, 2012

    Mr. Denham (for himself and Ms. Norton) submitted the following 
     concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                   Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the National Peace 
                      Officers' Memorial Service.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF THE CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR NATIONAL PEACE OFFICERS' 
              MEMORIAL SERVICE.

    (a) In General.--The Grand Lodge of the Fraternal Order of Police 
and its auxiliary (in this resolution referred to as the ``sponsor'') 
shall be permitted to sponsor a public event, the 31st Annual National 
Peace Officers' Memorial Service (in this resolution referred to as the 
``event''), on the Capitol Grounds, in order to honor the law 
enforcement officers who died in the line of duty during 2011.
    (b) Date of Event.--The event shall be held on May 15, 2012, or on 
such other date as the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the 
Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate jointly designate.

SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

    (a) In General.--Under conditions to be prescribed by the Architect 
of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board, the event shall be--
            (1) free of admission charge and open to the public; and
            (2) arranged not to interfere with the needs of Congress.
    (b) Expenses and Liabilities.--The sponsor shall assume full 
responsibility for all expenses and liabilities incident to all 
activities associated with the event.

SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS.

    Subject to the approval of the Architect of the Capitol, the 
sponsor is authorized to erect upon the Capitol Grounds such stage, 
sound amplification devices, and other related structures and 
equipment, as may be required for the event.

SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

    The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 
restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of title 40, United States 
Code, concerning sales, advertisements, displays, and solicitations on 
the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions applicable to the 
Capitol Grounds, in connection with the event.
                                 <all>
```
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION File Name: 19a0096n.06
Nos. 16

- 4103 / 4115

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellant

/ Cross

- Appellee ,

v. DARRELL D. MOORE , Defendant

- Appellee / Cross

- Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

BEFORE: BATCHELDER, GILMAN, and ROGERS, Circuit Judges ROGERS , Circuit Judge

. Darrell Moore pleaded guilty to one count of felon in possession of a firearm , 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). When a § 922(g) violator ha s at least three violent felonies

on his criminal record , he may be sentenced as an armed career criminal

— a designation that triggers a steep fifteen

- year mandatory minimum sentence, § 924(e)(1). Moore ha d three prior Ohio convictions

— for robbery, aggravated robbery, and aggravated assault

— which the Government contends are predicate vio lent felonies. But Moore was not sentenced as an armed career criminal, because the district court held that only one of those convictions (Ohio aggravated assault) is a violent felony under the Armed Career Criminal Act. S ubsequent decisions by this c ourt have brought into question the district court’s ACCA holdings . First, this court in United States v. Patterson held that Ohio aggravated robbery is categorically a violent felony under the ACCA. 853 F.3d 298, 302

– 03 (6th Cir. 2017). Second , this co urt in United S t ates v. Burris held that Ohio aggravated assault is divisible into two variant s,Nos. 16

- 4103 / 4115 , United States v. Moore

- 2

-

Ohio Rev. Code § 2903.12(A)(1) and (A)(2), and that a conviction under § 2903.12(A)(2) remains an ACCA predicate

. 912 F.3d 386 , 405 (6th Cir. 2019) ; id. at 410 (Rogers, J., concurring in part and in the judgment) ; id. at 410

– 11 (Kethledge, J., concurring in the judgment)

. It is unclear on this record which variant Moore was convicted of, and a look at the so

- called Shepard documents is required

. Third, the district court held that Ohio robbery under Ohio Rev. Code § 2911.02(A)(2) does not qualify under the ACCA because it requires a mens rea of only recklessness. But in doing so, the court relied on yet another since

- reversed precedent. Following the Supreme Court’s decision in Voisine v. United States , 136 S. Ct. 2272 (2016) , this court has held that recklessness may suffice under the eleme nts clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act. See United States v. Verwiebe , 874 F.3d 258, 252 (6th Cir. 2017)

. In light of these developments with respect to each of Moore’s three possible predicate offenses, w e vacate Moore’s sentence and remand for r esentencing consistent with these changes in the law

.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 72 (Tuesday, April 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 18333]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-9869]



[[Page 18333]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

``FEDERAL REGISTER'' CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: 62 FR 16563.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF MEETING: 10:00 a.m., Monday, 
April 28, 1997.

CHANGES IN THE MEETING: The Commodity Futures Trading Commission has 
changed the time of the closed meeting to discuss Enforcement matters 
to 10:30 a.m.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 97-9869 Filed 4-11-97; 2:35 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
**Exhibit10-c**

** **

**THIRD AMENDMENTOFADC TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.401(k) EXCESS PLAN(2002 Restatement)**

** **

WHEREAS, ADC TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC., a Minnesotacorporation (the “Principal Sponsor”), by resolution of its Board of Directors,has heretofore established and maintained a nonqualified, unfunded, deferredcompensation and supplemental retirement plan for the benefit of a select groupof management or highly compensated eligible employees (the “Plan”), which inits most restated form, is embodied in a document entitled “ADCTELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. 401(k) EXCESS PLAN (2002 Restatement),” as amended bytwo amendments (hereinafter collectively referred to the “PlanStatement”),  and

 

WHEREAS, The Retirement Committee of ADCTelecommunications, Inc. (the “Committee”) has been delegated the power to makefurther amendments of the Plan Statement which do not materially increase thecost of the Plan; and

 

WHEREAS, On September 4, 2002 but effective January 1,2003, the Committee adopted a resolution removing the Plan’s eligibilitygrandfathering provision applicable to certain employees who were eligible toparticipate in the Plan before November 1, 2000 (as embodied in Section 2.2 ofthe Plan Statement).

 

NOW, THEREFORE, The Plan Statement is hereby amendedconsistent with the Committee’s resolution:

 

**1.                 REMOVAL OF GRANDFATHERING PROVISION FORELIGIBILITY.  Effective for Plan Yearsbeginning on or after January 1, 2003, Section 2.2 of the Plan Statement shallbe deleted in its entirety without replacement.  Employees who are eligible to participate in this Plan pursuantto Section 2.2 shall become subject to the automatic cancellation rules inSection 2.4 for Plan Years beginning on or after January 1, 2003.**

** **

**2.                 SAVINGS CLAUSE. Save and except as hereinabove expressly amended, the Plan Statementshall continue in full force and effect.**

** **

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998             SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                               0                     961
<SECURITIES>                                         0                  13,303
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                  31,520
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                  42,365
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                  90,060
<PP&E>                                               0                 241,548
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                 155,675
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0                 218,681
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                  24,517
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                   6,792
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                 155,837
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0                 218,681
<SALES>                                         66,649                 220,247
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                66,649                 220,247
<CGS>                                           53,496                 179,845
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   53,496                 179,845
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,630                  19,409
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,523                  20,993
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,558                   7,767
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,965                  13,226
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .61                    2.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .60                    1.99
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON DC 

Aircraft Management Services, 

Complainant, 

v. 

Rosa County, .Florida 

Respondent. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

ORDER 

FAA Docket No.16-12-02 

On 25, 2015, counsel Respondent, Santa Rosa County, filed a Motion pursuant 

to 14 CFR § 16.19, requesting an extension oflime to August 26, 2015, to respond to 

the Director's Determination, FAA Docket No. 16·12·02, dated March 27,2015. 

Counsel advised that the Respondent continues to coordinate with both fixed based 

operators (FBOs) and needs the additional time to finalize a Corrective Action Plan. 

Counsel certified that he contacted the Complainant's counsel, and that the 

Complainant consents to the extension. 

Part 16 is intended to expedite the handling and disposition of airport-related 

complaints. Rules of Practice for Federally-Assisted Airport Enforcement 

Proceedings Final Rule, 61 Fed. Reg. 53998 (Oct !996). Extensions of time may 

be granted where necessary or appropriate for a fair and complete consideration of 

matters before the agency. See 14 CFR § l6.ll(a). 

An extension of time is reasonable under the circumstances. Accordingly, the 

Respondent is hereby granted an extension of time which to submit a Corrective 

Action Plan or to file an Appeal pursuantto CFR § 1633(c). The Respondent's 

submission or filing is now due on August 25, 2015. 

Director, Office of Airport 

Compliance and Management Analysis 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on June 2015, I caused to be placed in the United States mail 

(first class, postage paid) and to be at the addresses below or personally delivered a 

true copy of the foregoing Order addressed to: 

For Complainant 

Ryan Hatler 

Michael J. Schofield 

Clark, Partington, Hart, Larry, Bond & Stackhouse 

125 West Romana Street, Suite 800 

P.O. Box 13010 

Pensacola, 32591-3010 

Email: rl:!fl!J!lr(iilcphlrl.'!V-.e9.2!!!: mscb!lfi~ldial~Q.Illa..w"fom 

For Respondent 

Roy Andrews 

Santa Rosa County's Attorney's Office 

6495 Caroline Street Suite C 

Milton, FL 32570 

Email: roya@santarosa.fl.gov 

Gregory Stewart 

Harry F. Chiles 

William Garner 

Nabors, Giblin & Nickerson, P.A. 

1500 Mahan Drive, Suite 200 

Tallahassee, FL 32308 

Email: gstewart!Wngn]a w.com; bgm;Ilei@ng.nlaw .cQm; legal cadrnin(al,ngnlaw. com 

Copy to: 

FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket 

FAA Airport Compliance and Management Analysis, ACO-100
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6109

ERIC KEITH EBRON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RONALD J. ANGELONE, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CA-97-1142-AM) Submitted: July 22, 1998 Decided: August 5, 1998 Before ERVIN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eric Keith Ebron, Appellant Pro Se. Marla Graff Decker, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Eric Keith Ebron seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we denya certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Ebron v. Angelone , No. CA-97-1142-AM (E.D. Va. Dec. 16, 1997). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Lumley v. State

110,476

08/04/2015

Denied.

Unpublished
112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 133 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF THE ROTUNDA OF THE UNITED STATES 

4 CAPITOL TO PRESENT THE CONGRESSIONAL 

5 GOLD MEDAL. 

6 (a) AUTHORIZATION.—The rotunda of the United 

7 States Capitol is authorized to be used on September 12, 
2 

•HCON 133 EH 

1 2012, for the presentation of the Congressional Gold 

2 Medal to Arnold Palmer, in recognition of his service to 

3 the Nation in promoting excellence and good sportsman4 ship in golf. 

5 (b) PREPARATIONS.—Physical preparations for the 

6 conduct of the event described in subsection (a) shall be 

7 carried out in accordance with such conditions as may be 

8 prescribed by the Architect of the Capitol. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 19, 2012. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 133 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the United 

excellence and good sportsmanship in golf. ognition of his service to the Nation in promoting gressional Gold Medal to Arnold Palmer, in recStates Capitol for an event to present the Con-