alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 399 

Honoring the heroic actions of Court Security Officer Stanley Cooper, Deputy 

United States Marshal Richard J. ‘‘Joe’’ Gardner, the law enforcement 

officers of the United States Marshals Service and Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, and the Court Security Officers in responding 

to the armed assault at the Lloyd D. George Federal Courthouse on 

January 4, 2010. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 26, 2010 

Mr. ENSIGN (for himself and Mr. REID) submitted the following resolution; 

which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the heroic actions of Court Security Officer Stanley 

Cooper, Deputy United States Marshal Richard J. ‘‘Joe’’ 

Gardner, the law enforcement officers of the United 

States Marshals Service and Las Vegas Metropolitan 

Police Department, and the Court Security Officers in 

responding to the armed assault at the Lloyd D. George 

Federal Courthouse on January 4, 2010. 

Whereas on January 4, 2010, during an assault at the entrance of the Lloyd D. George Federal Courthouse in Las 

Vegas, Nevada, Court Security Officer Stanley Cooper 

was fatally wounded and died heroically in the line of 

duty while protecting the employees, occupants, and visitors of the courthouse; 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 399 ATS 

Whereas Deputy United States Marshal Richard J. ‘‘Joe’’ 

Gardner was wounded in the line of duty while protecting 

the employees, occupants, and visitors of the courthouse; 

Whereas the Court Security Officers and members of the 

United States Marshals Service and the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department acted swiftly and bravely to 

subdue the gunman and minimize risk and injury to the 

public; and 

Whereas the heroic actions of Court Security Officer Stanley 

Cooper, Deputy United States Marshal Richard J. ‘‘Joe’’ 

Gardner, and the law enforcement officers who responded 

to the attack prevented additional harm to innocent bystanders: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) commends the brave actions and quick 

3 thinking exhibited by Court Security Officer Stanley 

4 Cooper during the assault at the entrance of the 

5 Lloyd D. George Federal Courthouse on January 4, 

6 2010; 

7 (2) offers its deepest condolences to the family 

8 and friends of Court Security Officer Stanley Coo9 per, who valiantly gave his life in the line of duty; 

10 (3) commends Deputy United States Marshal 

11 Richard J. ‘‘Joe’’ Gardner for his actions and brav12 ery in responding to the assault; 

13 (4) wishes Deputy United States Marshal Rich14 ard J. ‘‘Joe’’ Gardner a speedy recovery from the 

15 wounds he sustained in the line of duty; and 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 399 ATS 

1 (5) applauds the Court Security Officers and 

2 members of the United States Marshals Service and 

3 Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department for their 

4 brave and courageous actions in responding to the 

5 assault at the Lloyd D. George Federal Courthouse. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 99.1
                                                                  ------------


                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWABS, INC.
                   ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES TRUST 2005-AB4
                  ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-AB4


     The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(a "Master Servicer"), and do hereby further certify pursuant to Section 3.16
of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

(i)  A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the
Agreement has been made under our supervision; and

(ii) To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                                         Dated: March 27, 2006
----------------

CRAIG BAINGO
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT



/s/ Kevin Meyers                                         Dated: March 27, 2006
----------------

KEVIN MEYERS
MANAGING DIRECTOR, CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER, LOAN ADMINISTRATION
**Exhibit 99.3****Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Compliance**The Board of DirectorsPrincipal Financial Group, Inc.Principal Life Insurance CompanyWe have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying report titled *Report ofManagement on Compliance*, that Principal Financial Group, Inc. and Principal Life Insurance Company(collectively, the “Company”) complied with the specified standards identified in Exhibit A to the*Report of Management on Compliance*(the “specified standards”) with respect to the secured notesissued by Principal Life Income Fundings Trust 2005-121 during the year ended December 31, 2005.Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with those specified standards. Ourresponsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliancebased on our examination.Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by thePublic Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, ona test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the specified standards and performingsuch other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that ourexamination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legaldetermination on the Company’s compliance with the specified standards.In our opinion, management’s assertion that Principal Financial Group, Inc. and Principal LifeInsurance Company complied with the aforementioned specified standards during the year endedDecember 31, 2005, is fairly stated, in all material respects.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP                                                            
Des Moines,IowaMarch 13, 2006
 

 
**Report of Management on Compliance**I, as a member of management of Principal Financial Group, Inc. and Principal Life InsuranceCompany (collectively, the “Company”), am responsible for complying with the standards identifiedin the attached Exhibit A (the “specified standards”) with respect to the secured notes issued byPrincipal Life Income Fundings Trust 2005-121. I am also responsible for establishing andmaintaining effective internal control over compliance with these specified standards. I haveperformed an evaluation of the Company’s compliance with the specified standards as of December 31,2005 and for the year then ended. Based on this evaluation, I assert that during the year endedDecember 31, 2005, the Company complied, in all material respects, with the specified standards.
/s/ Ellen Z. Lamale
## U NITED 

## S TATES 

## A IR 

## F ORCE 

## C OURT OF 

## C RIMINAL 

## A PPEALS

_______ _______ __________ No. ACM 40165

_______ _______ __________ UNITED STATES Appellee

v. Jelani A. GALE Airman (E

- 2 ) , U.S. Air Force, Appellant

_______ _______ __________ Appeal from the United S tates Air Force Trial Judiciary

Decided 25 August 20 2 2

_______ _______ __________ Military Judge: Christopher D. James

. S entence : Sentence adjudged on 13 May 2021 by G CM convened at Minot Air Force Base , North Dakota . Sentenc e entered by military judge on 8 June 2021 : Bad

- conduct discharge, confinement for 14 months , forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and reduction to E

- 1

. For Appellant: Major Eshawn R. Rawlley , USAF. For Appellee: Mary Ellen Payne, Esquire

. Before POSCH , RICHARDSON , and CADOTTE , Appellate Military Judges

.

_______ _______ __________ This is an unpublished opinion and, as such, does not serve as precedent under AFCCA R ule of Practice and Procedure 30 .4.

_______ _______ __ ________ PER CURI A M : The findings and sentence as entered are correct in law and fact, and no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. Articles 59(a) and 66(d), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859(a), 866( d ) ( Manual for Courts

- Martial, United States (2019 ed.) )

.United States v. Ga le , No. ACM 401 65

2 Accordingly, the findings and sentence are AFFIRMED

.

FOR THE COURT

CAROL K. JOYCE Clerk of the Court
No. 12-5229.

#### Hawkins *v.*Ohio.

Ct. App. Ohio, Hamilton County. Certiorari denied.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. §1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe annual report of Lawson Software, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ended May 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert G. Barbieri,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.                The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|        | /s/ rOBERT G. bARBIERI    |   |
|--------|---------------------------|--------|
|   | Robert G. Barbieri        |
|   | *Chief Financial Officer* |
|   | August 29, 2006      |

 

----
Addendum A



 EXHIBIT 10.24 
  
 ADDENDUM A TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
  
 This addendum is made on February 10, 2003 by and between QUANTUM Fuel Systems Technologies Worldwide, Inc. (herein
“QUANTUM”) and Brian Olson (herein “Employee”). For mutual and adequate exchange of consideration, the parties mutually agree to modify Employee’s Employment Agreement of September 1, 2002, as follows: 
  
 Section 2 of the above referenced Employment Agreement is hereby modified via
incorporating the following additional language. 
  
 “2.1 (a)
Effective February 10, 2003, Employee’s base salary is increased to $250,000 per year.” 
  
  

					
	/s/	 	 Brian Olson        

	 	 	 	/s/	 	 Alan Niedzwiecki


	 	 	Brian Olson	 	 	 	 	 	 Alan Niedzwiecki
 President &
CEO

	 	 	Dated:  Feb. 10, 2003	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 QUANTUM Fuel Systems
 Technologies
Worldwide, Inc.

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Dated:  Feb. 10, 2003
* The Honorable Mark L. Wolf, Chief United States District Judge for the District of Massachusetts, sitting by designation. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JAIME LUJAN-ALCALA, Defendant - Appellant. No. 10-50199 D.C. No. 3:09-cr-02583-IEG-1 Southern District of California, San Diego ORDER Before: HAWKINS and FISHER, Circuit Judges, and WOLF, Chief District Judge. * The Government’s Unopposed Motion to Unseal Memorandum Disposition is GRANTED. 

# FILED APR 18 2011 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
|                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                           
|View History:                                                            
|                                                                         
|Minnesota Natural Gas Industrial Price  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                         
|                                                                         
|Minnesota Natural Gas Industrial Price  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 3.28   | 2.88   | 2.98  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 4.42   | 5.16   | 4.18   | 5.88   | 6.57   | 8.49   | 8.09   | 7.65   | 9.05   | 5.66  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 5.58   | 5.55   | 4.28   | 4.94   | 6.57   | 4.87   | 4.19   | 4.48   | 4.80   | 4.44  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 3.99   | 5.47   | 8.43   | 5.90   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1
 
                       LORAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
                                  (Unaudited)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                           THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                              SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                                           -------------------
                                                                            1995        1994
                                                                           -------     -------
<S>                                                                        <C>         <C>
Primary:
  Net income applicable to common shares.................................  $82,071     $66,253
                                                                           =======     =======
  Shares:
     Weighted average common shares outstanding..........................  171,526     167,330
     Common equivalent shares applicable to stock options................    3,624       2,938
                                                                           -------     -------
     Average number of shares outstanding and common equivalent shares...  175,150     170,268
                                                                           =======     =======
Primary earnings per common share and common equivalent share............     $.47        $.39
                                                                           =======     =======
Fully Diluted:
  Net income applicable to common shares.................................  $82,071     $66,253
                                                                           =======     =======
  Shares:
     Average number of common shares as adjusted for primary
      computation........................................................  175,150     170,268
     Incremental increase to shares under stock options where the
      quarter's ending market price is higher than the average market
      price during the quarter...........................................      130         132
                                                                           -------     -------
     Average number of shares outstanding on a fully diluted basis.......  175,280     170,400
                                                                           =======     =======
Earnings per common share assuming full dilution.........................     $.47        $.39
                                                                           =======     =======
</TABLE>
 
                                       10
# C_2019428EN.01000201.xml

| 20.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 428/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 428/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9671 — Apollo/Blue Group)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 428/02)

On 12 December 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9671. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9671. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Amendment No. 6 to the 1998 Plan Restatement of the Columbus McKinnon Corp



 EXHIBIT 10.46 
  
 COLUMBUS McKINNON CORPORATION THRIFT 401(K) PLAN 
 PROPOSED AMENDMENT NO. 6 OF THE 1998 PLAN RESTATEMENT 
 IRS Technical Amendment

  
 Columbus McKinnon Corporation (the “Corporation”)
hereby amends the Columbus McKinnon Corporation Thrift 401(K) Plan (the “Plan”) as follows: 
  
 1. Section 1.19, entitled “Highly Compensated Employee”, is amended effective January 1, 1998 by changing Section 1.19(b)(1) to read as follows: 
  
 “(1) Meaning of “Compensation”. For the purpose of this Section 1.19, the term
“compensation” means compensation within the meaning of Code Section 415(c)(3) including amounts described in Code Section 415(c)(3)(D) except as provided in this Section 1.19(b)(1). For Plan Years beginning before January 1, 1998,
“compensation” shall not include elective deferrals described in Code Section 402(g)(3) or amounts excluded from the employee’s gross income under Code Sections 125 or 457. For Plan Years beginning before January 1, 2001,
“compensation” shall not include amounts excluded from gross income under Code Section 132(f)(4).” 
  
 2. Section 5.2, entitled “Definitions”, is amended effective January 1, 1998 by changing subsection (c) to read as follows: 
  
 “(c) “Taxable
Compensation” means, with respect to a Limitation Year, compensation as defined under Code Section 415(c)(3) and the Treasury Regulations thereunder. For more specificity, “Section 415 Compensation” shall mean compensation
reported on Form W-2 within the meaning of Treasury Regulation §1.415-2(d)(11)(i) increased by elective deferrals and other amounts required under Code Section 415(c)(3)(D) to be included in compensation except that amounts excluded from the
employee’s gross income under Code Section 132(f)(4) shall not be included in “Taxable Compensation” before the Limitation Year beginning on January 1, 2001. In no event shall a Participant’s Taxable Compensation for a Limitation
Year beginning on or after January 1, 1989 exceed the applicable Code Section 401(a)(17) Limit set forth in Section 1.6(b).” 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument of amendment has been executed by a duly authorized officer of the Corporation this 22nd day of May, 2003.

  

	 COLUMBUS McKINNON CORPORATION

		
	 By
	 	 /S/    ROBERT L.
MONTGOMERY




  

		
	 Title
  
	 	 Executive Vice President
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 0718 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, vs. LUCAS JAMES RICHESON,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including May 31 , 202 4 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 24 2024

04/24/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0718
No. 12-6061.

#### Douglas *v.*United States.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 76 (Tuesday, April 21, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 19728]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10491]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE


Cost Accounting Standards Board Review Panel; Notice of Web Page

    The Cost Accounting Standards Board (CASB) Review Panel was 
established in March 1998 to study, analyze, and assess the mission of 
the CASB in light of recent federal acquisition reforms. Formed at the 
request of Congress, the panel includes members from government, 
industry, and the accounting profession. It is anticipated that the 
panel will conclude its studies, analyses, and deliberations by the end 
of the current year and issue a report with recommendations to the 
Congress in early 1999.
    In conducting its work, the panel is seeking to obtain broad input 
from all interested parties including those in the government 
contracting community, academia, the accounting profession, and 
industry. At this time, the panel is seeking general comments on what 
are the most pertinent issues the panel should address regarding the 
CASB's mission in light of acquisition reform, its current structure, 
composition and membership, and the CASB's staff resources. As the 
panel proceeds with its work and focuses its attention on more specific 
issues, additional public comments on those issues will be solicited. 
Individuals interested in submitting comments to the panel can do so by 
visiting the CASB Review Panel's web page at http://www.gao.gov or can 
leave recorded messages at (202) 512-4501.
Ralph C. Dawn,
Executive Director, Cost Accounting Standards Board Review Panel.
[FR Doc. 98-10491 Filed 4-20-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1610-02-P