alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                              
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                
|View History:                                                                                 
|                                                                                              
|Oklahoma Natural Gas Price Sold to Electric Power Consumers  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                              
|                                                                                              
|Oklahoma Natural Gas Price Sold to Electric Power Consumers  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 2.97   | 2.48   | 2.79  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 4.54   | 4.62   | 3.55   | 5.58   | 6.14   | 8.28   | 6.58   | 6.69   | 8.18   | 3.92  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 4.84   | W      | 3.04   | 4.13   | W      | W      | W      | W      | W      | W     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | W      | W      | W      | W      |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 75 (Monday, April 20, 1998)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 19395]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10174]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 97-ACE-38]


Amendment to Class E Airspace; Chadron, NE

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document confirms the effective date of a direct final 
rule published on February 19, 1998, which revises Class E airspace at 
Chadron, NE.

DATES: The direct final rule published at 63 FR 8343 is effective on 
0901 UTC, June 18, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy Randolph, Air Traffic Division, 
Airspace Branch, ACE-520C, Federal Aviation Administration, 601 East 
12th Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 426-3408.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA published this direct final rule 
with a request for comments in the Federal Register on February 19, 
1998 (63 FR 8343). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure 
for a non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be 
no adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public 
that no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written 
adverse comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an 
adverse comment, were received within the comment period, the 
regulation would become effective on June 18, 1998. No adverse comments 
were received, and thus this document confirms that this direct final 
rule will become effective on that date.

    Issued in Kansas City, MO on March 25, 1998.
Herman J. Lyons, Jr.,
Manager, Air Traffic Division, Central Region.
[FR Doc. 98-10174 Filed 4-17-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
No. 12-5799.

#### Gagne *v.*Booker, Warden.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 77 (Wednesday, April 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 19909]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10624]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-185-000]


Ozark Gas Transmission System; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

April 16, 1998.
    Take notice that on April 9, 1998, Ozark Gas Transmission System 
(Ozark) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First 
Revised Volume No. 1:

Revised cover page
First Revised Sheet Nos. 2, 21D, 88A, 107, 114, 115, 121, 149, 154, 
156 and 166
Second Revised Sheet Nos. 17, 18, 19, 28 and 112
Third Revised Sheet No. 14, 46

    Ozark states that the revised tariff sheets are submitted to change 
the names and addresses set forth in its tariff for correspondence 
purposes, to correct certain typographical errors, and to eliminate 
certain provisions of its tariff that are no longer applicable. Ozark 
proposes a May 10, 1998 effective date for these sheets. Ozark states 
that copies of this filing have been served on its customers and 
interested state organizations.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a 
motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-10624 Filed 4-21-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
H. Con. Res. 135 Agreed to August 2, 2012

One Hundred Twelfth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twelve 

Concurrent Resolution 

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 

SECTION 1. USE OF ROTUNDA FOR PRESENTATION OF CONGRESSIONAL GOLD MEDAL TO DAW AUNG SAN SUU KYI. 

The Rotunda of the Capitol is authorized to be used on September 19, 2012, for the presentation of the Congressional Gold 

Medal to Daw Aung San Suu Kyi, in recognition of her leadership 

and perseverance in the struggle for freedom and democracy in 

Burma. Physical preparations for the ceremony shall be carried 

out in accordance with such conditions as the Architect of the 

Capitol may prescribe. 

Attest: 

Clerk of the House of Representatives. 

Attest: 

Secretary of the Senate.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 10.3



INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



We consent to the incorporation by reference in previously filed Registration
Statements of Korea Electric Power Corporation ("KEPCO") on Form F-3 (No.
33-99550) and No. 333-9180) of our report dated May 3, 2002 (which report
expresses an unqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraph relating to
the establishment of the Company, related party transactions, uncertainties
surrounding intangible assets and lawsuits in which the Company is a defendant
and the unstable economic conditions in the Republic of Korea and in the Asia
Pacific region) relating to the financial statements of Korea South-East Power
Co., Ltd., appearing in the Annual Report on KEPCO's Form 20-F for the year
ended December 31, 2002.



June 27, 2003                                       Ahn Kwon & Co.
                                                    Seoul, Korea

                                       1
|                                                                                              
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                
|View History:                                                                                 
|                                                                                              
|Natural Gas Delivered to Consumers in Minnesota (Including Vehicle Fuel)  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                              
|                                                                                              
|Natural Gas Delivered to Consumers in Minnesota (Including Vehicle Fuel)  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |         | 334,583 | 310,419 | 322,572
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 340,988 | 321,867 | 348,523 | 351,009 | 339,407 | 345,573 | 332,257 | 368,428 | 407,767 | 381,577
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 407,503 | 405,547 | 409,421 | 456,247 | 461,598 | 421,158 | 438,374 | 439,053 | 476,552 | 507,687
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 458,116 | 480,144 | 507,275 | 498,852 |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### State v. Kirkhart

111,486

09/23/2015

Denied

Unpublished
Honorable H. A. Hodges

County Auditor Williamson County Georgetown, Texas Dear Sir: Opinion No. O-4739 Re: Interest onjudgment in eminent domain case under facts stated.

,Your request for opinion has been received and carefully considered by this department.. We quote from your request as follows:

“I shall ,appreciate an opinion from your department relative to the’date towhich interest is to be paid by the County(Pla&tiff) when ajudgment is rendered against it, that is whether or not it is to the date the money is placed intrust to the County Clerk, or tothe date ofacceptance by the Defendant. “This County entered condemnation proceedings for land for aright-of-way for aState Highway, the Special Commissioners made the award which the defendant refused to accept and entered suit for more money, however thejury awarded less money thanwas awarded by the Special Commissioners, the Defendant refused to accept and the funds were placed by the County with the County Clerk, then the Defendant appealed to the Court of Civil Appeals, thejudgment was affirmed by the Appeals Court and the Defendant now requests payment ofthe award by thejury plus 6% interest from Sept, 25th, 1940 to date. The judgment inthe County Court being, as follows -, ’ (names) dohave and recover ofand from the said State ofTexas and county ofWilliamson the sum of EIGHT HUNDRED NINETY EIGHT AND 50/100 ($898.50) DOLLARS with interest thereon from this date until paid atthe rate of six per cent per ann.um.’

“It is my opinion that the County is obligated to pay interest only to the date the Tender was made (Being the date deposited with the County Clerk), and not during the time the case was before the Appeals Court. The County complied with the law and fulfilled its obligation when the deposit with the County Clerk was made. The matter of delay was occasioned by the Defendant ap-Honorable H. 

### A. Hodges, Page 2 (O-4739)

pealing the award and it appears to me that he is not entitled to interest during the term ofthe appeal especially as he refused to accept the payment from the County at the time stated. “Now this question-, Insuch acase as above stated is the County obligated to pay interest onajudgment rendered against itto the date ofacceptance by the Defendant, or just for the time from the award until the money was Tendered and refused and then placed intrust with the County Clerk?

“I shall appreciate your opinion atyour 

### very earliest convenience.” You state inyour letter that thejudgment ofthe county court adjudging interest from date ofjudgment until paid was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals. We assume from your letter that the case didnot go to the Supreme **Court** and that thejudgment ofthe Court ofCivil Appeals finally disposes ofthe case. Ifthis be true thejudgment must be paid according to its terms regardless ofwhether itwas originally erroneous. Yours very truly ATTORNEYGENERALOF TEXAS

BY /s/ Wm. .T.Fanning

Wm. J.Fanning APPROVED AUG. 5, 1942 Assistant /s/ Gerald C. Mann ATTORNEY GE,NERAL OF TEXAS WJF:GO:da APPROVED OPINION COMMITTEE BY BWB, CHAIRMAN
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2019027EN.01001401.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 22.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 27/14 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9249 — Triton/Sunweb)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 27/10)

1.

On 14 January 2019, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2019027EN.01001401-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Triton Managers V Limited (Jersey) and Triton Fund V GP SARL (Luxembourg), belonging to the group Triton (‘Triton’, Channel Islands), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | the group Sunweb (‘Sunweb’), via Holiday Holding Rotterdam BV (the Netherlands). |

Triton acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Sunweb.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for Triton: group of independent European private equity funds and companies, dedicated to investing primarily in medium-sized businesses headquartered in Northern Europe, with a focus on businesses in three core sectors: Business Services, Industrials and Consumer/Health,

—   for Sunweb: European online tour operator, providing packaged holidays to 20+ focal destinations across Europe and the Mediterranean.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2019027EN.01001401-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9249 — Triton/Sunweb

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2019027EN.01001401-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2019027EN.01001401-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lufkin Industries, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Douglas V. Smith, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Douglas V. Smith   
|Douglas V. Smith       
|Chief Executive Officer
|November 5, 2004       



This certification is made solely for
the purpose of 18 U.S.C. §1350 and not for any other purpose
#### White v. Barbieri

106,078

10/03/13

Denied. ...

Unpublished
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Samdrew VI, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Melvin F. Lazar,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/
                Melvin F. LazarMelvin
                F. Lazar
                Principal
                  Executive Officer
                  Principal
                    Financial Officer
                    March
                      16, 2007
#### COM. v. SANDS, D.

1902 EDA 2015

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/11/2017

Reargument Denied 8/3/2017

CP-51-CR-0010798-2014

(Philadelphia)

Reversed and Appellant Discharged
##### 



Exhibit 23.3

Consent of Independent Accountants

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-7590) of Royal Dutch Petroleum Company and The
Shell Transport and Trading Company, Public Limited Company of our report
dated March 13, 2002, relating to the Financial Statements of the Royal
Dutch/Shell Group of Companies which is included in this 2001 Annual Report on
Form 20-F.



|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ KPMG ACCOUNTANTS N.V., THE HAGUEKPMG Accountants N.V., The Hague
|                                                                    
|/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS, LONDONPricewaterhouseCoopers, London    
|                                                                    
|                                                                    
|                                                                    
|                                                                    
|April 8, 2002                                                       

Exhibits      E5
CERTIFICATION
Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his
capacity as an officer of Arrow-Magnolia International, Inc. ("Arrow"), that,
to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of Arrow on Form 10-Q for the period
ended September 30, 2002, fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operation of Arrow.


Date:  November 14,  2002                 By:  /s/ Mark Kenner
                                             ---------------------------------
                                             Mark Kenner, Chairman and Chief
                                                  Executive Officer



Date:  November 14, 2002	          By:  /s/ Fred Kenner
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Fred Kenner, President and
                                                  Chief Financial Officer