alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                    
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                      
|View History:                                                                       
|                                                                                    
|Mississippi Natural Gas Deliveries to Electric Power Consumers  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                    
|                                                                                    
|Mississippi Natural Gas Deliveries to Electric Power Consumers  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |         | 73,170  | 76,447  | 106,302
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 100,643 | 149,432 | 163,664 | 96,081  | 107,432 | 135,562 | 139,918 | 182,996 | 167,345 | 183,344
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 235,250 | 244,051 | 291,341 | 234,274 | 236,533 | 330,718 | 367,040 | 340,862 | 367,855 | 361,185
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 391,196 | 352,794 | 376,374 | 411,002 |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
# C_2018413EN.01001303.xml

| 14.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 413/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 413/13

---

TRANSLATION CENTRE FOR THE BODIES OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2017

(2018/C 413/50)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

http://cdt.europa.eu/en/documentation/empty/Finances/empty/empty/empty/empty

---
No. 12-5803.

#### Robinson *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**Exhibit 31.4**
**Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a)
**of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
I, Terry A. Hanson, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Madison Gas and Electric Company;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omitto state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:

	a.	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; and

	b.	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

	c.	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

	a.	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controlover financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial; and

	b.	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ Terry  A. Hanson Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary  Date: August 9, 2004****
Georgia-Pacific: Crossett, AR

Resin Plant Regenerative Thermal Oxidizer

Test Dates: May 16 and 17, 2012

Page: 3 of 29

SECTIONONE Introduction and Summary 

TABLE 1-1. RESIN PLANT RTO (INLET AND OUTLET LOADING) 

TEST RUN NOS. 1 – 3 (RECYCLE HEAT RECOVERY OFF) 

AVERAGE (RUN NOS. 1 - 3) 

SOURCE : Inlet Outlet 

GP Operating Parameters 

RTO combustion chamber temperature, °C 947 947 

Stack Gas Parameters 

Temperature, oF 91.6 382.5 

Volumetric flow, acfm 2,977 4,567 

Volumetric flow, scfm 2,859 2,876 

Volumetric flow, dscfh 167,484 166,490 

Total VOC (as Methanol) 

 lb/hr 59.06 0.94 

 DRE, % by weight 98.41 

Total VOC (measured by FTIR) 

 lb/hr 58.51 0.83 

 DRE, % by weight 98.57 

Total HAP 

 ppmv wb 754 15.4 

 ppmv @ 3% Oxygen ------ 23.7 

 lb/hr 13.02 0.25 

 DRE, % by weight 98.03 

Dimethyl Ether 

 ppmv wb 2,217 28.4 

 lb/hr 45.48 0.59 

 DRE, % by weight 98.71 

HAP - Acetaldehyde 

 ppmv wb 22 0.8 

 lb/hr 0.43 0.02 

 DRE, % by weight 96.42 

HAP - Cresols 

 ppmv wb 13 0.1 

 lb/hr 0.65 0.01 

 DRE, % by weight 99.22 

HAP - Formaldehyde 

 ppmv wb 40 2.8 

 lb/hr 0.53 0.04 

 DRE, % by weight 93.01 

HAP - Methanol 

 ppmv wb 614 11.1 

 lb/hr 8.76 0.16 

 DRE, % by weight 98.18 

HAP - Phenol 

 ppmv wb 5.8 0.1 

 lb/hr 0.24 0.01 

 DRE, % by weight 97.90 

HAP - Epichlorohydrin 

 ppmv wb 58 0.6 

 lb/hr 2.40 0.02 

 DRE, % by weight 97.58 

Carbon Monoxide 

 ppmv wb 9,271 255.1 

 lb/hr 114.53 3.20 

 DRE, % by weight 97.20 

Hydrogen Chloride 

 ppmv db ------ 55.2 

 lb/hr ------ 0.85 

679-04 1-3
Georgia-Pacific: Crossett, AR

Resin Plant Regenerative Thermal Oxidizer

Test Dates: May 16 and 17, 2012

Page: 4 of 29

SECTIONONE Introduction and Summary 

TABLE 1-2. RESIN PLANT RTO (INLET AND OUTLET LOADING) 

TEST RUN NOS. 4 – 6 (RECYCLE HEAT RECOVERY ON) 

AVERAGE (RUN NOS. 4 - 6) 

SOURCE : Inlet Outlet 

GP Operating Parameters 

RTO combustion chamber temperature, °C 910 910 

Stack Gas Parameters 

Temperature, oF 91.2 390.3 

Volumetric flow, acfm 3,052 5,000 

Volumetric flow, scfm 2,930 3,118 

Volumetric flow, dscfh 172,701 179,893 

Total VOC (as Methanol) 

 lb/hr 67.04 1.72 

 DRE, % by weight 97.47 

Total VOC (measured by FTIR) 

 lb/hr 61.98 1.49 

 DRE, % by weight 97.62 

Total HAP 

 ppmv wb 1,026 33.5 

 ppmv @ 3% Oxygen ------ 50.4 

 lb/hr 15.76 0.53 

 DRE, % by weight 96.73 

Dimethyl Ether 

 ppmv wb 2,198 42.9 

 lb/hr 46.22 0.96 

 DRE, % by weight 97.92 

HAP - Acetaldehyde 

 ppmv wb 24 0.5 

 lb/hr 0.49 0.01 

 DRE, % by weight 97.91 

HAP - Cresols 

 ppmv wb 13 0.1 

 lb/hr 0.63 0.01 

 DRE, % by weight 

HAP - Formaldehyde 

 ppmv wb 41 6.3 

 lb/hr 0.56 0.09 

 DRE, % by weight 83.39 

HAP - Methanol 

 ppmv wb 940 26.3 

 lb/hr 13.73 0.41 

 DRE, % by weight 97.12 

HAP - Phenol 

 ppmv wb 4.2 0.0 

 lb/hr 0.18 0.00 

 DRE, % by weight 98.60 

HAP - Epichlorohydrin 

 ppmv wb 3.8 0.2 

 lb/hr 0.16 0.01 

 DRE, % by weight 88.86 

Carbon Monoxide 

 ppmv wb 9,361 356.7 

 lb/hr 119.67 4.86 

 DRE, % by weight 95.94 

Hydrogen Chloride 

 ppmv db ------ 5.2 

 lb/hr ------ 0.09 

679-04 1-4
#### COM. v. ROBLES, S.

1521 MDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/07/2017

CP-06-CR-0003806-2008 (Berks)

Affirmed
Exhibit 10.5
 NOTICE TO U.S. TAX RESIDENTS:
  VESTING OF THIS PERFORMANCE CASH UNIT AWARD WILL BE A TAXABLE EVENT AND WILL RESULT IN THE
RECOGNITION BY YOU OF ORDINARY INCOME IN AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO THE FAIR MARKET VALUE OF THE
UNITS THAT BECOME VESTED. ON SUCH DATE WHEN VESTING OCCURS AND AS A CONDITION TO THE CASH
PAID TO YOU, THE COMPANY MUST COLLECT ALL REQUIRED INCOME, SOCIAL AND OTHER PAYROLL TAX
WITHHOLDING FROM YOU BASED UPON SUCH FAIR MARKET VALUE.
 NOTICE TO NON-U.S. RESIDENTS:
  YOU MAY HAVE ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR YOUR AWARD, WHICH ARE DESCRIBED IN
EXHIBIT B TO THIS AGREEMENT. IN ADDITION, IF YOU ARE A TAX RESIDENT OF A COUNTRY OUTSIDE THE
U.S., YOUR TAX CONSEQUENCES MAY BE DIFFERENT THAN DESCRIBED ABOVE. AS A CONDITION TO THE
CASH PAID TO YOU, THE COMPANY MUST COLLECT ALL REQUIRED INCOME, SOCIAL AND OTHER PAYROLL
TAX WITHHOLDING THAT MAY BE DUE BY REASON OF THE GRANT OR VESTING OF THIS AWARD.
 ADC TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.  THREE-YEAR PERFORMANCE-BASED
CASH UNIT AWARD AGREEMENT
 TO:    RSU#:   SAP EMPLOYEE ID#:
   1. Grant Date:
 2. Number of Restricted Cash Units Subject to this Award:
 3. Vesting Schedule:
 4. Conversion of Restricted Cash Units and Payment.
 5. Termination of Employment.




---



##### 



6. Workforce Protection.
     7. Right to Units.
 8. Tax Withholding.
   9. Transfer of Award.
 10. Acceleration of Scheduled Vest Date.




---



##### 








---



##### 



11. Further Acts.
 12. New, Substituted or Additional Securities.
 13. Severability.
 14. Governing Law.
 15. Limitation on Rights; No Right to Future Grants; Extraordinary Item.
 16. Confidential Information.




---



##### 



17. Data Privacy Consent.
  ADC TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.
    
    
    
    Date
#### Darryl M. EDNEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-0697

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed August 4, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County. Robert Wheeler, Judge.

AFFIRMED.
Hoii. George W. Cox, W. D. 

state H<li Officer 

Austin, Texas 

Dear Sir: Opinion No. 0-1.562 

Re: Whether $4.00 per day llmltatlon 

on traveling expenses provided by 

rider to departmental approprlatlon bill applies to trip by-State 

Health Officer to Washington, D;C., 

at request of Federal offlclals, 

expenses of such trip to be pald 

out of funds allocated to the 

State of Texas by the Children's 

Bureau of the Federal Government. 

This will acknowledge receipt of your letter of October 6; 1939;wherel.n you advise that you have been requested. 

by Miss Katharine F:'Lenroot, Chief'of the Children's Bureau, 

and by Surgeon General Thomas Parran' of the United States 

Public Health Service, to come to~washington, D. C., for the 

purpose. of studying plans, rules and regulations for the ad-- 

mlnFstratFon of health affairs and moneys allocated to Texas, 

and that you have been advised by' Miss Lenroot that your expenses ~111 be paid out of funds allocated to the State of 

Texas by the Children's Bureau. 

You desire the opinion of this department upon the 

following question: 

"Please advise me if expenses incurred on a 

trip.to Washlcgton, onofficial business, ~111 be 

limited to $4.00 per day, or will the expenses 

incident thereto be limited to actual'expenses if 

paid out of funds allocated to the Health Department of the State of Texas by the United States 

Public Health Service. or the ChlldrenVs Bureau." 

Your question is not one which can be gZven a 

categorical answer, upon the basis of the information contalned inyour letter. The answer to your question depenas upon 

the facts as to whether or not, in allocating funds to the 

State of Texas by the Children's Bureau, the Federal government has made an unrestricted grant of such~funas ln,such manner as to constitute the funds "State funds," subject to the 
Hon. George W. Cox, M. D., page 2 o-1562 

complete control of ~the Leglslatldn of the State of Textis. 

If this be the sltuation,~the expenses incurred by you on 

your trlp,to Washington,'6n official business, would.bi ~lmlted to $4.00 per d&y, in accordance with the rider appended-to 

the departmental appropflatlon bill. On the other hi%na, if 

the condition of th& grailt to the State of Texas by the 

Children's Bureau was'that the expenditure of such Federal 

funds should be subject to the control of the 'proper 'Fed&al 

authbPltle&, or the grant at the'tlme it was made'prescrlbed 

the use that might be made of such funds in respect to 

traveling expenses authorized to be paid therefrom, such ". 

funds would be received and retained by the State of Texas" 

impressed with the trust, and the exp&nilture~of 's;uch:~fUiiis 

Would be controlled by the Federal regulations, rather than 

by our State laws. 

Yours very truly 

ATTORNEYGENERAL OF TEXAS 

By s/R. W. Fairchild 

R. w. FaiPChlla 

RWF:pbp:wc 

APPROVED OCT ‘~23, 1939 

s/Gerald C. Mann 

ATTORNEYGENERAL OF TE?3S 

Approved Opinion Committee By s/BWB Chalrman
#### State v. O’Neill

107,254

09/04/13

Denied. ....

Unpublished
|                                                                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                    
|View History:                                                                                     
|                                                                                                  
|Percent of Industrial Natural Gas Deliveries in North Carolina Represented by the Price  (Percent)
|                                                                                                  
|                                                                                                  
|Percent of Industrial Natural Gas Deliveries in North Carolina Represented by the Price  (Percent)
|                                                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 45.5   | 32.1   | 47.8  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 52.2   | 30.5   | 39.2   | 36.9   | 29.1   | 26.4   | 20.8   | 21.2   | 19.1   | 13.6  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 11.6   | 9.7    | 8.8    | 9.2    | 10.2   | 10.7   | 10.6   | 10.8   | 11.3   | 12.1  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 11.9   | 12.2   | 13.3   | 15.8   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.6


                         Consent of Independent Auditors



We consent to the reference of our firm under the caption "Selected Financial
Data" and the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form
F-3 No. 33-99550 and No. 333-9180) and the related Prospectus of our report
dated April 21, 2001, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
Korea Electric Power Corporation included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F) for
the year ended December 31, 2002.


Young Wha
Seoul, Korea
June 24, 2003
#### State v. Thomas

110,571

09/23/2015

Denied

Unpublished
#### State v. White

107,903

107,940

108,033

10/30/13

Denied.

Unpublished
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 73 (Thursday, April 16, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 18938]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10117]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND HUMANITIES


Cooperative Agreement for Technical and Administrative Support 
for a National Meeting of Folk Arts Coordinators

AGENCY: National Endowment for the Arts.

ACTION: Notification of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Endowment for the Arts is requesting proposals 
leading to the award of a Cooperative Agreement to provide 
administrative and technical assistance services that will support 
professional development activities for state and regional Folk Arts 
Coordinators. This will entail planning, organization, and 
implementation of a national meeting in conjunction with the annual 
National Assembly of State Arts Agencies meeting to be held in 
Portland, Oregon in November 1998. Funding is anticipated to be 
$50,000. Eligibility to apply for the Cooperative Agreement is limited 
to nonprofit organizations, including educational institutions, and 
units of state and local government, ideally with a working knowledge 
of and a track record of experience with the folk and traditional arts 
field. Those interested in receiving the Solicitation should reference 
Program Solicitation PS 98-05 in their written request and include two 
(2) self-addressed labels. Verbal requests for the Solicitation will 
not be honored.

DATES: Program Solicitation PS 98-05 is scheduled for release 
approximately May 4, 1998 with proposals due on June 4, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Requests for the Solicitation should be addressed to the 
National Endowment for the Arts, Grants & Contracts Office, Room 618, 
1100 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, D.C. 20506.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William Hummel, Grants & Contracts 
Office, National Endowment for the Arts, Room 618, 1100 Pennsylvania 
Ave., NW, Washington, D.C. 20506 (202/682-5482).
William I. Hummel,
Coordinator, Cooperative Agreements and Contracts.
[FR Doc. 98-10117 Filed 4-15-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 76 (Tuesday, April 21, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 19714]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10412]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


The Ohio State University, et al.; Notice of Consolidated 
Decision on Applications for Duty-Free Entry of Electron Microscopes

    This is a decision consolidated pursuant to Section 6(c) of the 
Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 
(Pub. L. 89-651, 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). Related records can be 
viewed between 8:30 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. in Room 4211, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, 14th and Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C.
    Docket Number: 97-103. Applicant: The Ohio State University, 
Columbus, OH 43210. Instrument: Electron Microscope, Model CM200. 
Manufacturer: Philips, The Netherlands. Intended Use: See notice at 63 
FR 5364, February 2, 1998. Order Date: July 10, 1997.
    Docket Number: 98-005. Applicant: University of California, Davis, 
Davis, CA 95618. Instrument: Electron Microscope, Model LEEM III. 
Manufacturer: Elmitec Elektronenmikroskopie GmbH, Germany. Intended 
Use: See notice at 63 FR 11870, March 11, 1998. Order Date: December 3, 
1996.
    Docket Number: 98-012. Applicant: University of New Orleans, New 
Orleans, LA 70148. Instrument: Electron Microscope, Model JEM-2010. 
Manufacturer: JEOL, Ltd., Japan. Intended Use: See notice at 63 FR 
12451, March 13, 1998. Order Date: January 8, 1998.
    Docket Number: 98-014. Applicant: University of Wisconsin-Eau 
Claire, Eau Claire, WI 54702-4004. Instrument: Electron Microscope, 
Model JEM-2010. Manufacturer: JEOL, Ltd., Japan. Intended Use: See 
notice at 63 FR 12452, March 13, 1998. Order Date: December 1, 1997.
    Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. No instrument of 
equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument, for such 
purposes as these instruments are intended to be used, was being 
manufactured in the United States at the time the instruments were 
ordered. Reasons: Each foreign instrument is a conventional 
transmission electron microscope (CTEM) and is intended for research or 
scientific educational uses requiring a CTEM. We know of no CTEM, or 
any other instrument suited to these purposes, which was being 
manufactured in the United States either at the time of order of each 
instrument or at the time of receipt of application by the U.S. Customs 
Service.
Frank W. Creel,
Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff.
[FR Doc. 98-10412 Filed 4-20-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P