alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**
**Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14  and 15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934**
I, Gary J. Wolter, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MGE Energy, Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omitto state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e), forthe registrant and have:

	a.	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

	b.	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report for conclusions about the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

	c.	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonable likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

	a.	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant'sability to record, process, summarize and report financial; and

	b.	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
/s/ Gary J. WolterChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer      August 14, 2003
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-30556

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JEANI M. SMITH,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 95-CR-30028

- - - - - - - - - -

January 15, 1997

Before SMITH, DUHÉ, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jeani M. Smith pleaded guilty to a one-count Bill of

Information charging her with bank fraud in violation of 18

U.S.C. § 1344. Smith asserts that the district court erred in

enhancing her base offense level for amount of loss, more than

minimal planning, and abuse of trust. The district court did not

err in applying any of these enhancements. Payments of

restitution may not be used to reduce the amount of loss. United
No. 96-30556

- 2 -

States v. Akin, 62 F.3d 700, 702 (5th Cir. 1995). The guidelines

define "more than minimal planning" as "more planning than is

typical for commission of the offense in a simple form." 

§ 1B1.1, comment. (n.1(f)). It "is deemed present in any case

involving repeated acts over a period of time, unless it is clear

that each instance was purely opportune." Id. The record shows

that Smith stole the checks and forged them over a two-month

period and made a false debit entry to attempt to cover $3000 of

the fraud. Finally, Smith’s position of trust "significantly

facilitated" the commission of the offense. United States v.

Fisher, 7 F.3d 69, 70-71 (5th Cir. 1993). 

Smith argues that the district court erred by not granting a

downward departure for overstatement of her criminal history or

diminished mental capacity. “The imposition of a lawful sentence

coupled with the decision not to depart from the guidelines

provides no ground for relief.” United States v. DiMarco, 46

F.3d 476, 477 (5th Cir. 1995); 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a).

The district court did not err in denying either Smith’s

motion to reconsider the sentence imposed or in denying her

motion for released pending appeal because Smith has not shown

any error in the sentence imposed. See United States v. Clark,

917 F.2d 177, 178-79 (5th Cir. 1990). 

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 31.1

                              302 CERTIFICATION

I, R.H. Wollenberg, certify that:

     1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Longview Fibre
Company;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and
have:

     (a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
          to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
          period in which this report is being prepared;

     (b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
          the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of
          the end of the period covered by this report based on such
          evaluation; and

     (c)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting that occurred during the
          registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth
          fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
          affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
          registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

      5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

     (a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
          or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     (b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
          other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
          internal control over financial reporting.

R. H. WOLLENBERG	                              September 14, 2004
R. H. WOLLENBERG,
President, CEO and Chairman
No. 11-10692.

#### Lawn *v.*Tucker, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
**Exhibit        32.2**

**CERTIFICATION        OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL & ACCOUNTING OFFICER**

**PURSUANT        TO 18 USC § 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY        ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1)      | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d), as                  applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and |
|--------|-----------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2)      | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the Company                  at the date and for the periods                  indicated. |
|--------|-----------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:                   January 30, 2008 |   |   |  /s/                  Diping Zhou                                                                                               |
|------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                           |   |   | Diping                  ZhouChief                  Accounting Officer(Principal                  Financial & Accounting Officer) |

----
# C_2019001EN.01000102.xml

| 3.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 1/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 1/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9212 — MinebeaMitsumi/U-Shin)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 1/02)

On 14 December 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9212. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9212. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
|                                                                       
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                         
|View History:                                                          
|                                                                       
|Kentucky Natural Gas Underground Storage Capacity  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                       
|                                                                       
|Kentucky Natural Gas Underground Storage Capacity  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |         |         | 206,572 | 206,603
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 312,061 | 307,235 | 210,242 | 210,242 | 209,753 | 215,351 | 216,351 | 219,907 | 219,907 | 219,907
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 219,913 | 220,000 | 220,596 | 220,804 | 220,844 | 218,927 | 218,394 | 220,359 | 220,359 | 220,368
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 221,751 | 221,751 | 221,751 | 221,723 | 221,723 | 221,722 | 221,723 | 221,798 | 221,695 | 221,695
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 221,695 | 221,695 | 221,695 |         |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
#### COM. v. TINSLEY, T.

431 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/18/2017

CP-51-CR-0011849-2013 (Philadelphia)

Remanded Jurisdiction Retained
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 73 (Wednesday, April 16, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 18596]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-9758]



[[Page 18596]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-197-001]


Chandeleur Pipe Line Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

April 10, 1997.
    Take notice that on April 7, 1997, Chandeleur Pipe Line Company 
(Chandeleur) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Volume 
No. 1, the revised tariff sheets set forth in Appendix A to the filing, 
in compliance with the Commission's Order No. 587 and the Commission's 
March 4, 1997 Order in this docket, to become effective June 1, 1997.
    On July 17, 1997, The Commission issued Order No. 587 in Docket No. 
RM96-1-000 which revised the Commission's regulations governing 
interstate natural gas pipelines to require such pipelines to follow 
certain standardized business practices issued by the Gas Industry 
Standards Board (GISB) and adopted by the Commission in said Order 18 
CFR 284.10(b). On December 18, 1997, Chandeleur made its compliance 
filing submitting proforma tariff sheets to comply with Order No. 587. 
On March 4, 1997, the Commission issued an order in this docket in 
response to Chandeleur's filing. The order required Chandeleur to 
revise and submit its compliance filing for implementation of the 
approved standards by June 1, 1997.
    Chandeleur states that it is serving copies of the filing to its 
customers, State Commissions and interested parties.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed on 
or before April 28, 1997. Protests will be considered by the Commission 
in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve 
to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-9758 Filed 4-15-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 6 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 6

Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for an event marking 
  the 50th anniversary of the inaugural address of President John F. 
                                Kennedy.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 2011

  Mr. Lewis of Georgia submitted the following concurrent resolution; 
      which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for an event marking 
  the 50th anniversary of the inaugural address of President John F. 
                                Kennedy.

Whereas John Fitzgerald Kennedy was elected to the United States House of 
        Representatives and served from January 3, 1947, to January 3, 1953, 
        until he was elected by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts to the Senate 
        where he served from January 3, 1953, to December 22, 1960;
Whereas, on November 8, 1960, John Fitzgerald Kennedy was elected as the 35th 
        President of the United States; and
Whereas, on January 20, 1961, President Kennedy was sworn in as President of the 
        United States and delivered his inaugural address at 12:51 p.m., a 
        speech that served as a clarion call to service for the Nation: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF THE ROTUNDA OF THE CAPITOL FOR AN EVENT HONORING 
              PRESIDENT KENNEDY.

    The rotunda of the United States Capitol is authorized to be used 
on January 20, 2011, for a ceremony in honor of the 50th anniversary of 
the inaugural address of President John F. Kennedy. Physical 
preparations for the conduct of the ceremony shall be carried out in 
accordance with such conditions as may be prescribed by the Architect 
of the Capitol.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2019192EN.01000501.xml

| 7.6.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 192/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 192/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9375 — Clearlake/Insight/Appriss)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 192/02)

On 23 May 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9375. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9375. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
#### Leandre SCOTT, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D16-5479

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 18, 2017

L.T. No.: 15-CF-012089A

Granted.
No. 12-108.

#### Sidamon-Eristoff, Treasurer of New Jersey, et al. *v.*New Jersey Food Council et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Officer's
        Certificate
 
 BSABS
        2005-AQ1, BSABS 2005-AQ2
  
 I,
        Sue
        Stepanek, Executive Vice President of EMC Mortgage Corporation, do hereby
        certify to the designated Master Servicer that in respect to the period ending
        November 30, 2005, a review of the activities of EMC Mortgage Corporation
        ("EMC") during the preceding fiscal year or applicable portion thereof and
        it's
        performance under the above referenced Pooling and Servicing Agreement has
        been
        made under my supervision. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review,
        EMC has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement throughout
        such
        year, or, if there has been a default in the fulfillment of any such obligation,
        specifying each such default known to such Servicing Officer and the nature
        and
        status thereof except for such defaults as such officer in
        its
        good faith judgment believe to be immaterial.
  
 /s/
        Sue Stepanek
 Sue
        Stepanek, Executive Vice President
 
 2/15/06
 Date
  Two
                    MacArthur Ridge 909 Hidden Ridge Drive, Suite 200 Irving, Texas
                    75038Mailing
                    Address: P.O. Box 141358, Irving, Texas
                    75014-1358
No. 12-6305.

#### Currier *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Tank Sports, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-KSB for the period ended February 28, 2006, as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,  Jing
      Jing
      Long, in my capacity as Principal Executive Officer  of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Date:
        March 9, 2007




/s/
        Jing
        Jing
        Long


Jing
          Jing
          Long


Principal
      Executive Officer