alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. Energy Information Administration Quarterly Coal Report, October - December 2023

Table 6. Quantity and average price of U.S. coal imports by origin, 2017 - 2023

(short tons and dollars per short ton)

Year and quarter Australia Canada Colombia Indonesia China Venezuela

Other

countries Total

2017 700 891,734 6,112,092 699,453 6,474 46 92,153 7,802,652

2018 - 770,364 4,060,581 915,188 28,624 - 179,398 5,954,155

2019 - 817,190 5,033,032 655,398 54,715 - 136,802 6,697,137

2020 - 448,719 3,655,196 639,982 109,814 - 283,659 5,137,370

2021 - 1,034,232 3,366,886 494,168 116,743 - 376,319 5,388,348

2022

January - March - 333,642 895,327 61,968 30,302 - 426 1,321,665

April - June - 546,183 972,409 58,575 58,977 - - 1,636,144

July - September - 562,782 1,273,513 17,011 72,767 - 44,285 1,970,358

October - December - 330,036 902,518 - 57,066 - 95,680 1,385,300

U.S. Total - 1,772,643 4,043,767 137,554 219,112 - 140,391 6,313,467

2023

January - March - 151,005 692,014 - 61,300 - 115,947 1,020,266

April - June - 192,792 695,900 - 21,114 - 104,418 1,014,224

July - September - 228,606 615,840 - 44,446 - 105,529 994,421

October - December - 217,638 643,782 - 48,624 - 71,221 981,265

U.S. Total - 790,041 2,647,536 - 175,484 - 397,115 4,010,176

Average price

(dollars per short ton)

2017 74.89 189.83 64.39 64.11 97.33 103.33 132.12 79.53

2018 - 191.25 61.39 75.42 132.01 - 117.88 82.39

2019 - 184.33 62.77 67.10 96.13 - 148.37 80.04

2020 - 129.46 60.54 74.23 84.43 - 115.10 71.79

2021 - 157.70 69.12 65.76 132.31 - 130.74 91.49

2022

January - March - 113.78 75.51 64.77 155.04 - 95.94 86.50

April - June - 141.45 85.52 64.77 88.02 - - 103.54

July - September - 146.65 121.59 237.02 115.14 - 347.71 134.59

October - December - 213.73 101.51 - 102.90 - 295.89 141.73

U.S. Total - 151.35 98.23 86.07 110.17 - 311.63 118.04

2023

January - March - 250.43 114.36 - 122.31 - 220.64 147.05

April - June - 290.46 103.04 - 70.91 - 225.71 150.63

July - September - 241.17 99.25 - 88.90 - 211.60 143.34

October - December - 238.29 101.69 - 104.71 - 180.60 137.86

U.S. Total - 254.18 104.79 - 102.79 - 212.39 144.79

- = No data reported.

Note: Average price is based on the customs import value, including value for shipments of specialty coal not used as a fuel source (about 0.05 percent of all shipments).

Customs import value is the price paid for merchandise when sold for exportation to the United States, excluding U.S. import duties, freight, insurance, and other

charges incurred in bringing the merchandise to the United States. Coal imports include coal to Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. Total may not equal sum of

components because of independent rounding.

Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, 'Monthly Report IM 145.'
EXHIBIT 32.1
                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Ezio Montagliani,  certify,  pursuant  to  18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act  of  2002,  that  the  Annual
Report on Form  10-KSB  of  Streamscape Minerals Inc., for the fiscal year ended
May 31, 2006 fully complies with  the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and  that  the  information contained in the
Annual  Report  on  Form  10-KSB  fairly presents in all material  respects  the
financial condition and results of operations of Streamscape Minerals Inc.

Date:  September 7, 2006

                                                /s/ Ezio Montagliani
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Ezio Montagliani
                                                President, C.E.O. and Director
                                                (Principal Executive Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 14 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 14

 Expressing the sense of the Congress that non-defense, non-security, 
  non-veterans discretionary spending should be reduced by 20 percent.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 8, 2011

  Mr. Quayle submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
    referred to the Committee on the Budget, and in addition to the 
Committees on Oversight and Government Reform and House Administration, 
for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 
for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of 
                        the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the Congress that non-defense, non-security, 
  non-veterans discretionary spending should be reduced by 20 percent.

Whereas total Government spending in fiscal year 2010 exceeded $3.5 trillion;
Whereas the 111th Congress failed to adopt a budget resolution;
Whereas the Congressional Budget Office estimates that total Federal spending in 
        fiscal year 2011 will reach $3.71 trillion;
Whereas the Congressional Budget Office estimates that the fiscal year 2011 
        budget deficit will exceed $1.47 trillion;
Whereas the Congressional Budget Office estimates that the fiscal year 2012 
        budget deficit will reach $1.1 trillion;
Whereas, since fiscal year 2008, non-defense discretionary spending has 
        increased by 84 percent; and
Whereas the Federal debt is expected to exceed $14.3 trillion in April 2011: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that--
            (1) non-defense, non-security, non-veterans discretionary 
        spending by the Government in fiscal year 2011 should be 
        reduced by 20 percent from fiscal year 2010 spending levels; 
        and
            (2) if the percentage reduction specified in paragraph (1) 
        is not achieved, rates of basic pay for individuals serving in 
        the executive and legislative branches of the Government, 
        respectively, should be reduced by 15 percent, beginning in 
        fiscal year 2012.
                                 <all>
```
#### Wiles v. American Family Life Assurance Co.

106,661

10/17/13

Granted. ...

Unpublished
#### U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee for the C-BASS MORTGAGE LOAN ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-RP2 v. WILLIE LEE PINKNEY, CLARA PINKNEY, SIDDCO, INC., and POORE SUBSTITUTE TRUSTEE, LTD

From Forsyth County

No. 229P16

ORDER

The petition for discretionary review is allowed for the purpose of addressing the issues set forth in the petition and the following additional issue: “Whether any provision of North Carolina law, including, but not limited to, N.C.G.S. §§ 25-3-203, -3-301 (2015), would preclude dismissal with prejudice of the claims asserted in plaintiff’s complaint, including the claim for judicial foreclosure, despite the apparent absence of a complete chain of indorsements?”

By Order of the Court in Conference, this 22nd day of September, 2016.

s/Ervin. J.

For the Court

WITNESS my hand and the seal of the Supreme Court of North Carolina, this the 23rd day of September, 2016.

J. BRYAN BOYD Clerk of the Supreme Court

s/M.C. Hacknev Assistant Clerk
|                                                                                             
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                               
|View History:                                                                                
|                                                                                             
|Percent of Commercial Natural Gas Deliveries in Tennessee Represented by the Price  (Percent)
|                                                                                             
|                                                                                             
|Percent of Commercial Natural Gas Deliveries in Tennessee Represented by the Price  (Percent)
|                                                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 97.5   | 95.7   | 96.4   | 95.8   | 94.1   | 93.8   | 94.3   | 92.2   | 87.3   | 88.8  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 92.5   | 93.6   | 90.9   | 90.5   | 92.2   | 92.2   | 92.0   | 91.9   | 91.7   | 90.2  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 90.8   | 89.9   | 88.8   | 90.0   | 90.7   | 88.5   | 87.2   | 87.3   | 88.6   | 88.8  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 87.7   | 87.2   | 87.5   | NA     |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
|                                                                                             
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                               
|View History:                                                                                
|                                                                                             
|Vermont Natural Gas Price Sold to Electric Power Consumers  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                             
|                                                                                             
|Vermont Natural Gas Price Sold to Electric Power Consumers  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 3.16   | 2.90   | 3.23  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 4.91   | 4.83   | 3.86   | --     | --     | 8.93   | 7.82   | 7.72   | 9.14   | 5.66  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 5.73   | 5.26   | 4.14   | --     | --     | --     | --     | W      | W      | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | W      | W      | --     |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
**Exhibit10-a**

 

**FIRST AMENDMENTOFADC TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. 401(K) EXCESS PLAN(2002 Restatement)**

 

WITNESSETH: That

 

WHEREAS, ADC TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC., a Minnesotacorporation (the “Principal Sponsor”), by resolution of its Board of Directors,has heretofore established and maintained a nonqualified, unfunded, deferredcompensation and supplemental retirement plan for the benefit of a select groupof management or highly compensated eligible employees, which in its mostrestated form, is embodied in a document effective January 1, 2002 and entitled“ADC Telecommunications, Inc. 401(k) Excess Plan (2002 Restatement)” (the“Plan Statement”); and

 

WHEREAS, The Principal Sponsor has delegated to theRetirement Committee of ADC Telecommunications, Inc. the power to makefurther amendments of the Plan Statement in any respect that does notmaterially increase the cost of the plan, and the Retirement Committeedesires  to amend the Plan Statement;

 

NOW, THEREFORE, The Plan Statement is hereby amendedin the following respects:

 

**1.**                 CODE § 162(m)DELAY.  Effective for distributionspayable on or after February 26, 2002, Section 7 of the Plan Statement shall beamended by the addition of the following new Section 7.5 and all subsequentsections (and cross-references thereto) shall be renumbered:

** **

7.5               **Code §162(m) Delay**.  If theCommittee determines that delaying the time that initial payments are made orcommenced would increase the probability that such payments would be fullydeductible for federal or state income tax purposes, the Employer mayunilaterally delay the time of the making or commencement of payments until theJanuary 31 of the calendar year next following the calendar year in which thepayments would otherwise be payable.

 

**2.**                 SAVINGSCLAUSE.  Save and except as hereinaboveexpressly amended, the Plan Statement shall continue in full force and effect.

** **

----
EXHIBIT 32.3  Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002   In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Madison Gas and Electric Company for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, Gary J. Wolter, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    /s/ Gary J. Wolter Gary J. Wolter Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer Date: August 7, 2007
#### BLACKBURN, J. v. KING INVESTMENT GROUP, LLC

2409 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/06/2017

Reargument Denied 9/11/2017

No. 2015-01295-CT

(Chester)

Affirmed
No. 12-5773.

#### Soto-Echevarria *v.*Wenerowicz, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Graterford, et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 73 (Thursday, April 16, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18919-18920]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10075]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Freight Forwarder License; Applicants

    Notice is hereby given that the following applicants have filed 
with the

[[Page 18920]]

Federal Maritime Commission applications for licenses as ocean freight 
forwarders pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 
U.S.C. app. 1718 and 46 CFR 510).
    Persons knowing of any reason why any of the following applicants 
should not receive a license are requested to contact the Office of 
Freight Forwarders, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573.

Cargo Systems Int'l, Corp., 9550 NW 12th Street, Bay #10, Miami, FL 
33172, Officers: Francisco J. Nunez, President, Angela C. Damasio, Vice 
President
Linda Yumi Matsuura, 2615 Plaza Del Amo #600, Torrance, CA 90503, Sole 
Proprietor

    Dated: April 13, 1998.
Joseph C. Polking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-10075 Filed 4-5-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
|                                                             
|-------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                               
|View History:                                                
|                                                             
|U.S. Natural Gas Industrial Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                             
|                                                             
|U.S. Natural Gas Industrial Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0    | Year-1    | Year-2    | Year-3    | Year-4    | Year-5    | Year-6    | Year-7    | Year-8    | Year-9   
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | ---------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |           |           |           |           |           |           |           | 8,510,879 | 8,320,407 | 8,079,359
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 8,142,240 | 7,344,219 | 7,527,184 | 7,150,396 | 7,256,408 | 6,601,168 | 6,526,546 | 6,654,716 | 6,670,182 | 6,167,371
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 6,826,192 | 6,994,120 | 7,226,215 | 7,425,452 | 7,646,039 | 7,521,903 | 7,728,688 | 7,943,018 | 8,417,300 | 8,416,660
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 8,212,977 | 8,374,672 | 8,536,882 | 8,537,902 |           |           |           |           |           |          
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
# C_2019385EN.01000201.xml

| 13.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 385/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.11.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 385/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9406 — Lone Star — Stark Group/Saint-Gobain BDD)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 385/02)

On 5 September 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9406. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9406. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
No. 12-5109.

#### Falls *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.