Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 24 / Tuesday, February 5, 2013 / Notices 8219 

(19) Mario Salinas-Lucio; January 9, 

2012; U.S. District Court, Southern 

District of Texas; Case No. 

1:09CR00824–001; January 1968. 

(20) Leoncio Sanchez; June 22, 2012; 

U.S. District Court, Southern District of 

Texas; Case No. 1:11CR01100–002; 

August 1989. 

(21) Andro Telemi; November 30, 

2012; U.S. District Court, Northern 

District of Illinois; Case No. 09 CR 736– 

2; June 1970. 

(22) Guillermo Enrique Villarreal; 

June 22, 2012; U.S. District Court, 

Southern District of Texas; Case No. 

1:11CR01100–001; October 1974. 

As noted above, at the end of the 

three-year period following the date of 

this notice, the above named persons/ 

entities remain debarred unless export 

privileges are reinstated. 

Debarred persons are generally 

ineligible to participate in activity 

regulated under the ITAR (see e.g., 

sections 120.1(c) and (d), and 127.11(a)). 

Also, under Section 127.1(d) of the 

ITAR, any person who has knowledge 

that another person is subject to 

debarment or is otherwise ineligible 

may not, without disclosure to and 

written approval from the Directorate of 

Defense Trade Controls, participate, 

directly or indirectly, in any ITARcontrolled export in which such 

ineligible person may benefit there from 

or have a direct or indirect interest 

therein. 

Further, Federal Register document 

2012–18043, published at 77 FR 43414, 

Tuesday, July 24, 2012, is corrected on 

page 43415, by deletion in its entirety of 

lines 66 through 70, inclusive. That 

notice of statutory debarment 

incorrectly included as a debarred party 

the following record: 

‘‘(33) Balraj Naidu; December 20, 2010; 

U.S. District Court, District of Maryland, Case 

No. CCB–1–08–CR–0091–002; February, 

1967.’’ 

Mr. Naidu was indicted under seal in 

February, 2008, for, inter alia, 

conspiracy to violate, and violation of, 

the AECA. The judgment filed by the 

court and dated December 20, 2010 and 

relied on for purposes of statutory 

debarment stated as the nature of the 

offense for which judgment was entered 

‘‘Conspiracy to Violate the Arms Export 

Control Act’’ and cited to U.S. Code 

Title and Sections ‘‘18:371 & 22:2778.’’ 

Subsequently, the court filed an 

amended judgment dated May 16, 2012, 

to correctly identify as the nature of the 

offense for which judgment was entered 

‘‘Conspiracy to Provide Material 

Support to a Foreign Terrorist 

Organization’’ and cited to U.S. Code 

Title and Sections ‘‘18 USC 2339B(a)(1); 

18 USC 2339A(b)(1).’’ As Mr. Naidu was 

not, in fact, convicted of violating, or 

conspiracy to violate, the AECA, the 

provisions of Section 127.7(c) of the 

ITAR are not applicable. 

This notice is provided for purposes 

of making the public aware that the 

persons listed above are prohibited from 

participating directly or indirectly in 

activities regulated by the ITAR, 

including any brokering activities and 

in any export from or temporary import 

into the United States of defense 

articles, related technical data, or 

defense services in all situations 

covered by the ITAR. Specific case 

information may be obtained from the 

Office of the Clerk for the U.S. District 

Courts mentioned above and by citing 

the court case number where provided. 

Dated: January 16, 2013. 

Andrew J. Shapiro, 

Assistant Secretary, Bureau of PoliticalMilitary Affairs, Department of State. 

[FR Doc. 2013–02491 Filed 2–4–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710–25–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Office of the Secretary 

Applications for Certificates of Public 

Convenience and Necessity and 

Foreign Air Carrier Permits 

Notice of Applications for Certificates 

of Public Convenience and Necessity 

and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed 

Under Subpart B (formerly Subpart Q) 

during the Week Ending January 12, 

2013. The following Applications for 

Certificates of Public Convenience and 

Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier 

Permits were filed under Subpart B 

(formerly Subpart Q) of the Department 

of Transportation’s Procedural 

Regulations (See 14 CFR 301.201 et 

seq.). The due date for Answers, 

Conforming Applications, or Motions to 

Modify Scope are set forth below for 

each application. Following the Answer 

period DOT may process the application 

by expedited procedures. Such 

procedures may consist of the adoption 

of a show-cause order, a tentative order, 

or in appropriate cases a final order 

without further proceedings. 

Docket Number: DOT–OST–2013– 

0006. 

Date Filed: January 7, 2013. 

Due Date for Answers, Conforming 

Applications, or Motion to Modify 

Scope: January 28, 2013. 

Description: Application of Sirio 

S.p.A. requesting a foreign air carrier 

permit and exemption authority to 

engage in the following operations using 

small aircraft: (a) Foreign charter air 

transportation of persons, property, and 

mail from any point or points behind 

any Member State of the European 

Community via any point or points in 

any Member State and via intermediate 

points to any point or points in the 

United States and beyond; (b) foreign 

charter air transportation of persons, 

property, and mail between any point or 

points in the United States and any 

point or points in any Member State of 

the European Common Aviation Area; 

(c) foreign charter cargo air 

transportation between any point and 

points in the United States and any 

other point or points; and (d) charter 

transportation consistent with any 

future, additional rights that may be 

granted to foreign air carriers of the 

Member States of the European 

Community. 

Docket Number: DOT–OST–2009– 

0010. 

Date Filed: January 8, 2013. 

Due Date for Answers, Conforming 

Applications, or Motion to Modify 

Scope: January 29, 2013. 

Description: Application of 1263343 

Alberta Inc. d/b/a enerjet (‘‘enerjet’’) 

requesting that the Department amend 

its foreign air carrier permit to enable it 

to engage in scheduled air 

transportation of persons, property, and 

mail between Canada and the United 

States as more specifically: enerjet seeks 

authority to (i) conduct scheduled 

foreign air transportation of persons, 

property, and mail from points behind 

Canada, via Canada and intermediate 

points, to a point or points in the United 

States and beyond, co-extensive with 

that provided for in Annex 1, Section 

1.B of the Open Skies Agreement (the 

‘‘Air Transport Agreement’’) between 

Canada and the United States signed on 

March 12, 2007 and (ii) scheduled and 

charter foreign air transportation of 

cargo between any point or points in the 

United States and any other point or 

points; in addition to maintaining its 

existing authority. 

Docket Number: DOT–OST–2008– 

0105 and DOT–OST–2011–0076. 

Date Filed: January 10, 2013. 

Due Date for Answers, Conforming 

Applications, or Motion to Modify 

Scope: January 31, 2013. 

Description: Application of Federal 

Express Corporation (‘‘FedEx Express’’) 

requesting renewal of its certificate of 

public convenience and necessity for 

Route 568, authorizing FedEx Express to 

engage in scheduled foreign all-cargo air 

transportation between a point or points 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
8220 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 24 / Tuesday, February 5, 2013 / Notices 

in the United States, and certain named 

points in Mexico. 

Barbara J. Hairston, 

Acting Program Manager, Docket Operations, 

Federal Register Liaison. 

[FR Doc. 2013–02452 Filed 2–4–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–9X–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Notice of Release From Quitclaim Deed 

and Federal Grant Assurance 

Obligations for Delano Municipal 

Airport, Delano, CA 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration, DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of Request to Release 

Airport Land. 

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) proposes to rule 

and invites public comment on the 

application for a release of 

approximately 9.89 acres of airport 

property at Delano Municipal Airport, 

Delano, California from all conditions 

contained in the Quitclaim Deed and 

Grant Assurances since the parcels of 

land are not needed for airport 

purposes. The property will be 

conveyed at its fair market value for the 

benefit of the airport. The use of the 

land by the City of Delano will remain 

the same and represents a continued 

compatible land use that will not 

interfere with the airport or its 

operation, thereby protecting the 

interests of civil aviation. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before March 7, 2013. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Comments on the request may be mailed 

or delivered to the FAA at the following 

address: Tony Garcia, Airports 

Compliance Program Manager, Federal 

Aviation Administration, Airports 

Division, Federal Register Comment, 

15000 Aviation Boulevard, Lawndale, 

CA 90261. In addition, one copy of the 

comment submitted to the FAA must be 

mailed or delivered to Mr. Roman 

Dowling, Public Works Director, City of 

Delano, 1015 Eleventh Avenue, P.O. 

Box 3010, Delano, California 93216– 

3010. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In 

accordance with the Wendell H. Ford 

Aviation Investment and Reform Act for 

the 21st Century (AIR 21), Public Law 

10–181 (Apr. 5, 2000; 114 Stat. 61), this 

notice must be published in the Federal 

Register 30 days before the Secretary 

may waive any condition imposed on a 

federally obligated airport by surplus 

property conveyance deeds or grant 

agreements. 

The following is a brief overview of 

the request: 

The City of Delano, California 

requested a release from the conditions 

contained in the Quitclaim Deed and 

Grant Assurance obligations for 

approximately 9.89 acres of airport land. 

The property is located on the west and 

north sides of the airport in the vicinity 

of Lexington Street. A City public works 

facility occupies 7.8 acres, while 2.09 

acres serve as part of the city golf 

course. The land has not served an 

airport purpose and will not be needed 

for future airport purposes. The land 

will be conveyed to the City for its fair 

market value. The property will 

continue to be used for the same 

purpose, so it will remain a compatible 

use that will not interfere with airport 

operations. The conveyance will not 

prevent development of the airport, 

thereby serving the interests of civil 

aviation. 

Issued in Hawthorne, California, on 

January 29, 2013. 

Brian Armstrong, 

Manager, Safety and Standards, Airports 

Division, Western-Pacific Region. 

[FR Doc. 2013–02475 Filed 2–4–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

Fiscal Service 

Surety Companies Acceptable on 

Federal Bonds—Change In Business 

Address and Redomestication: 

American Fire and Casualty Company 

(NAIC #24066) and The Ohio Casualty 

Insurance Company (NA1C #24074) 

AGENCY: Financial Management Service, 

Fiscal Service, Department of the 

Treasury. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: This is Supplement No. 4 to 

the Treasury Department Circular 570, 

2012 Revision, published July 2, 2012, 

at 77 FR 39322. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Surety Bond Branch at (202) 874–6850. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is 

hereby given by the Treasury that the 

above-named companies formally 

changed their ‘‘BUSINESS ADDRESS’’ 

to ‘‘62 Maple Avenue, Keene, NH 

03431’’ effective immediately. In 

addition, the above-named companies 

have redomesticated from the state of 

Ohio to the state of New Hampshire 

effective October 1, 2012. Federal bondapproving officers should annotate their 

reference copies of the Treasury Circular 

570 (‘‘Circular’’), 2012 Revision, to 

reflect these changes. 

The Circular may be viewed and 

downloaded through the Internet at 

http://www.fms.treas.gov/c570. 

Questions concerning this Notice may 

be directed to the U.S. Department of 

the Treasury, Financial Management 

Service, Financial Accounting and 

Services Division, Surety Bond Branch, 

3700 East-West Highway, Room 6F01, 

Hyattsville, MD 20782. 

Dated: January 14, 2013. 

Kevin McIntyre, 

Acting Director, Financial Accounting and 

Services Division, Financial Management 

Service. 

[FR Doc. 2013–02294 Filed 2–4–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4810–35–M 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

Office of Foreign Assets Control 

Actions Taken Pursuant to Executive 

Order 13382 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Treasury Department’s 

Office of Foreign Assets Control 

(‘‘OFAC’’) is announcing an update to 

the entry of an entity on OFAC’s SDN 

List by adding an alias to the entity’s 

entry. The addition of the alias by the 

Director of OFAC, pursuant to Executive 

Order 13382, is effective on January 24, 

2013. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Assistant Director, Compliance 

Outreach & Implementation, Office of 

Foreign Assets Control, Department of 

the Treasury, Washington, DC 20220, 

Tel.: 202/622–2490. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Electronic and Facsimile Availability 

This document and additional 

information concerning OFAC are 

available from OFAC’s Web site 

(www.treasury.gov/ofac) or via facsimile 

through a 24-hour fax-on-demand 

service, Tel.: 202/622–0077. 

Background 

On June 28, 2005, the President, 

invoking the authority, inter alia, of the 

International Emergency Economic 

Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–1706) 

(‘‘IEEPA’’), issued Executive Order 

13382 (70 FR 38567, July 1, 2005) (the 

‘‘Order’’), effective at 12:01 a.m. eastern 

daylight time on June 29, 2005. In the 

Order, the President took additional 

steps with respect to the national 

emergency described and declared in 

Executive Order 12938 of November 14, 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES