alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF CHAPARRAL ENERGY, INC



|                              |  |                           |  |                                
|----------------------------- |  | ------------------------- |  | -------------------------------
|Name of Subsidiary            |  | Jurisdiction of Formation |  | Effective Ownership            
|Chaparral Resources, L.L.C.   |  | Oklahoma                  |  | Chaparral Energy, Inc.  100%  
|                              |  |                          
|Chaparral Real Estate, L.L.C. |  | Oklahoma                  |  | Chaparral Energy, Inc.  100%  
|                              |  |                          
|Chaparral CO2, L.L.C.         |  | Oklahoma                  |  | Chaparral Energy, Inc.  100%  
|                              |  |                          
|NorAm Petroleum, L.L.C.       |  | Oklahoma                  |  | Chaparral Energy, Inc.  100%  
|                              |  |                          
|CEI Pipeline, L.L.C.          |  | Texas                     |  | Chaparral Energy, Inc.  100%  
|                              |  |                          
|Chaparral Energy, L.L.C.      |  | Oklahoma                  |  | Chaparral Energy, Inc.  100%  
|                              |  |                          
|CEI Acquisition, L.L.C.       |  | Delaware                  |  | Chaparral Energy, L.L.C.  100%
|                              |  |                          
|Green Country Supply, Inc.    |  | Oklahoma                  |  | Chaparral Energy, Inc.  100%  
|                              |  |                          
|Chaparral Biofuels, L.L.C.    |  | Oklahoma                  |  | Chaparral Energy, Inc.  100%  
|                              |  |                          
|Oklahoma Ethanol L.L.C.       |  | Oklahoma                  |  | Chaparral Energy, Inc.  66.7%
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 665 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 665

 To require a witness before a committee hearing to file a disclosure 
 form identifying substantial financial interests or compensation from 
   an organization or company directly related to the subject of the 
                                hearing.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 29, 2010

Mr. Grassley submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
               the Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 To require a witness before a committee hearing to file a disclosure 
 form identifying substantial financial interests or compensation from 
   an organization or company directly related to the subject of the 
                                hearing.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This resolution may be cited as the ``Witness Sunshine 
Resolution''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO THE STANDING RULES.

    Paragraph 4(b) of rule XXVI of the Standing Rules of the Senate is 
amended by--
            (1) inserting ``(1)'' after ``(b)''; and
            (2) inserting at the end the following:
    ``(2)(A) Each committee (including the Committee on Appropriations) 
shall require each witness who is to appear before the committee in any 
hearing to file with the clerk of the committee, at least 1 day before 
the date of the appearance of that witness, a disclosure form 
identifying any arrangement, affiliation, relationship, or substantial 
financial interest the witness has with any organization, company, 
private, or government entity directly related to the subject of the 
hearing as well as the nature of the relationship disclosed, unless the 
committee chairman and the ranking minority member determine that there 
is good cause for noncompliance.
    ``(B) For any witness who at the time of the hearing is employed by 
the Federal Government, submission of his or her Executive Branch 
Personnel Public Financial Disclosure Report may fulfill the 
requirements of this clause at the discretion of the Chairman and the 
Ranking Member so long as the completed form is up to date and 
discloses all relevant arrangements, affiliations, relationships, and 
substantial financial interests.
    ``(C) If so requested by the committee, the staff of the committee 
shall prepare for the use of the members of the committee before each 
day of hearing before the committee a digest of the disclosure forms 
which have been filed under this clause by witnesses who are to appear 
before the committee on that day. In addition, the disclosure forms 
shall be made part of the committee record.''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2019036EN.01000102.xml

| 29.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 36/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 36/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9208 — WorleyParsons/Jacobs ECR)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 36/02)

On 21 January 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9208. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9208. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  
  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
#### City of Dodge City v. Webb

109,634

06/29/2015

Granted.

50 Kan. App. 2d 393
#### Bautista v. State

110,401

07/21/2015

Denied.

Unpublished
No. 12-5907.

#### Villafane *v.*LaValley, Superintendent, Clinton Correctional Facility.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                          61,950
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  132,446
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    178,136
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               396,459
<PP&E>                                       1,770,254
<DEPRECIATION>                                 260,298
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,934,455
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          241,420
<BONDS>                                        582,057<F1>
<COMMON>                                           463
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         40
<OTHER-SE>                                     882,272
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,934,455
<SALES>                                      1,051,656
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,051,656
<CGS>                                          710,931
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  780,054<F2>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                42,699<F3>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,985
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                215,389
<INCOME-TAX>                                    57,320
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            158,069
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   158,069
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.50
<FN>
<F1>REFLECTS THE COMPANY'S LONG-TERM DEBT.
<F2>TOTAL COSTS REFLECTS THE COMPANY'S COST OF GOODS SOLD AND DEPRECIATION,
DEPLETION AND AMORTIZATION COSTS.
<F3>OTHER EXPENSES REFLECTS SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE COMBINED WITH
EXPLORATION RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT COSTS.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 2 (Monday, January 5, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 206]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-025]



[[Page 206]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration
[A-201-806]


Steel Wire Rope From Mexico: Extension of Time Limits for 
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of extension of time limits for preliminary results of 
antidumping administrative review.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 5, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Leah Schwartz or Maureen Flannery, 
Office of AD/CVD Enforcement, Import Administration, International 
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
3782 or (202) 482-3020, respectively.

The Applicable Statute

    Unless otherwise indicated, all citations to the statute are 
references to the provisions effective January 1, 1995, the effective 
date of the amendments made to the Tariff Act of 1930 (the Act) by the 
Uruguay Round Agreements Act.

Extension of Time Limits for Preliminary Results

    The Department of Commerce (the Department) has received a request 
to conduct an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on 
Steel Wire Rope from Mexico. On May 21, 1997, the Department initiated 
this administrative review covering the period March 1, 1996 through 
February 28, 1997.
    Because of the complexity of certain issues in this case, it is not 
practicable to complete this review within the time limits mandated by 
section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. See Memorandum from Joseph A. Spetrini 
to Robert S. LaRussa, Extension of Time Limit for the Administrative 
Review of Steel Wire Rope from Mexico, dated December 24, 1997. 
Therefore, in accordance with that section, the Department is extending 
the time limits for the preliminary results to March 31, 1998, and for 
the final results to 120 days after the publication of the preliminary 
results.
    These extensions of time limits are in accordance with section 
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.

    Dated: December 24, 1997.
Joseph A. Spetrini,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for AD/CVD Enforcement III.
[FR Doc. 98-025 Filed 1-2-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
[ARTICLE] 5
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   9-MOS
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          APR-30-1999
[PERIOD-END]                               JAN-31-1999
[CASH]                                             470
[SECURITIES]                                         0
[RECEIVABLES]                                        0
[ALLOWANCES]                                         0
[INVENTORY]                                          0
[CURRENT-ASSETS]                                   470
[PP&E]                                               0
[DEPRECIATION]                                       0
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                                     470
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]                                0
[BONDS]                                              0
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                                0
[PREFERRED]                                          0
[COMMON]                                           168
[OTHER-SE]                                         302
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]                       470
[SALES]                                              0
[TOTAL-REVENUES]                                     0
[CGS]                                                0
[TOTAL-COSTS]                                        0
[OTHER-EXPENSES]                                     0
[LOSS-PROVISION]                                     0
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                                   0
[INCOME-PRETAX]                                      0
[INCOME-TAX]                                         0
[INCOME-CONTINUING]                                  0
[DISCONTINUED]                                       0
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                      0
[CHANGES]                                            0
[NET-INCOME]                                         0
[EPS-PRIMARY]                                        0
[EPS-DILUTED]                                        0
</TABLE>
#### COM. v. LOVE, B.

3788 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/13/2017

CP-15-CR-0001744-2016 (Chester)

Affirmed
```

[Federal Register: February 10, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 27)]
[Notices]               
[Page 6639]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr10fe10-39]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

 
Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: Wednesday, February 10, 2010, 2-4 p.m.

PLACE: Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, 
Bethesda, Maryland.

STATUS: Closed to the Public.

MATTER TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Compliance Weekly Report--Commission Briefing

    The staff will brief the Commission on various compliance matters.
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-7948.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814 (301) 504-7923.

    Dated: February 2, 2010.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-2809 Filed 2-9-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-M
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 72 (Tuesday, April 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 18363]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-9675]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-33, 158]


Ansewn Shoe Company, Bangor, ME; Amended Certification Regarding 
Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273) the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to 
Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on March 18, 1997, applicable to 
all workers of Ansewn Shoe Company located in Bangor, Maine. The notice 
will soon be published in the Federal Register.
    At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. New findings show that 
the Department incorrectly set the impact date at January 16, 1996. The 
workers at the subject firm were covered under an earlier 
certification, TA-W-30,230, which did not expire until October 27, 
1996. To avoid a coverage overlap for the same group of workers at 
Ansewn Shoe, the Department is amending the current certification to 
insert the new impact date of October 27, 1996.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-33,158 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Ansewn Shoe Company, Bangor, Maine, who became 
totally or partially separated from employment on or after October 
27, 1996 are eligible to appy for adjustment assistance under 
Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, D.C. this 28th day of March 1997.
Russell T. Kile,
Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 97-9675 Filed 4-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
307P15-2

#### The Kimberley Rice Kaestner 1992 Family Trust v. North Carolina Department of Revenue

1. State’s Motion for Temporary Stay (COA15-896)

2. State’s Petition for *Writ of Supersedeas*

1. Allowed 07/25/2016

2.
#### State v. Nelson

104,070

05/20/13

Denied. ...

Unpublished
IV 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 47 

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the District of Columbia 

Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 2, 2011 

Mr. DENHAM (for himself and Ms. NORTON) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 

and Infrastructure 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the District 

of Columbia Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF USE OF THE CAPITOL 

4 GROUNDS FOR DC SPECIAL OLYMPICS LAW 

5 ENFORCEMENT TORCH RUN. 

6 On June 3, 2011, or on such other date as the Speak7 er of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 

8 Rules and Administration of the Senate may jointly des9 ignate, the 26th Annual District of Columbia Special 

10 Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run (in this resolution 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HCON 47 IH 

1 referred to as the ‘‘event’’) may be run through the Cap2 itol Grounds as part of the journey of the Special Olympics 

3 torch to the District of Columbia Special Olympics sum4 mer games. 

5 SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CAPITOL POLICE BOARD. 

6 The Capitol Police Board shall take such actions as 

7 may be necessary to carry out the event. 

8 SEC. 3. CONDITIONS RELATING TO PHYSICAL PREPARA9 TIONS. 

10 The Architect of the Capitol may prescribe conditions 

11 for physical preparations for the event. 

12 SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS. 

13 The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforce14 ment of the restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of 

15 title 40, United States Code, concerning sales, advertise16 ments, displays, and solicitations on the Capitol Grounds, 

17 as well as other restrictions applicable to the Capitol 

18 Grounds, in connection with the event. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
# C_2019403EN.01007801.xml

| 29.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 403/78 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.11.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 403/78

---

Corrigendum to Special Report No 18/2019 ‘EU greenhouse gas emissions: Well reported, but better insight needed into future reductions’

(Official Journal of the European Union C 400 of 26 November 2019)

(2019/C 403/09)

This publication should be considered null and void.

---
#### COM.vs. ROSENDARY, E.

1503 WDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/10/2017

CP-25-CR-0000036-2014 (Erie)

Affirmed
|                                                                       
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                         
|View History:                                                          
|                                                                       
|Natural Gas Citygate Price in Kansas  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                       
|                                                                       
|Natural Gas Citygate Price in Kansas  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        | 4.13   | 3.18   | 2.88   | 2.70   | 2.05   | 2.28  
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 2.76   | 2.62   | 2.50   | 2.80   | 2.86   | 2.36   | 3.05   | 3.47   | 2.96   | 2.96  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 4.52   | 6.06   | 4.12   | 5.97   | 6.68   | 9.08   | 9.08   | 8.27   | 8.85   | 6.12  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 6.08   | 5.53   | 4.74   | 4.98   | 6.10   | 4.59   | 4.02   | 4.51   | 4.21   | 3.68  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 3.42   | 11.27  | 7.58   | 6.44   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/28/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 7/31/2024
EXHIBIT 32.3   Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002   In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Madison Gas and Electric Company (the "Company"), for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, Gary J. Wolter, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    /s/ Gary J. WolterGary J. Wolter
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: November 5, 2009