alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.38

THIRD AMENDMENT TO LETTER AGREEMENT

This Third Amendment to Letter Agreement is dated January 29, 2009, between Eddie
Bauer Holdings, Inc. (Eddie Bauer) and McNeil S. Fiske, Jr. (Executive).

RECITALS

A. Eddie Bauer and Executive are parties to a Letter Agreement dated June 12, 2007, as amended August 5, 2008 and December 31, 2008, relating to
Executives employment with Eddie Bauer (the Letter Agreement).

B. The parties desire to amend the Letter Agreement to effectuate the
Executives voluntary reduction of his salary for 2009.

AGREEMENT

For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:

1. Defined Terms. All capitalized terms used herein shall have the definition set forth in the Letter Agreement unless otherwise specified.

2. Base Salary. The parties hereby agree that the biweekly payments of the Executives Base Salary shall be reduced by 10% per payment, beginning with the pay period commencing January 18, 2009, to a biweekly payment
of $38,076.92 before deductions. The reduction in Base Salary shall continue through December 31, 2009. The Executives Base Salary shall automatically return to $1,100,000 annually without further action on the part of the Executive or
Company on January 1, 2010.

3. Severance Benefits. The parties agree that notwithstanding the reduction in Base Salary as provided in
paragraph 2 above, in the event that Severance Pay becomes due during calendar 2009 under the terms of the Letter Agreement or the Companys Senior Officer Change in Control Compensation Benefit Plan (the Change in Control Plan),
the amount of Severance Pay shall be calculated based upon the Executives full unreduced amount of Base Salary as set forth in the introduction to the Letter Agreement, rather than the reduced amount specified in paragraph 2 above.

4. Incentive Bonus. In the event that an annual incentive bonus shall become payable to the Executive for performance during 2009, the amount thereof shall be
determined based upon the full unreduced amount of the Base Salary as set forth in the introduction to the Letter Agreement, rather than the reduced amount specified in paragraph 2 above.

5. No Other Modifications. Except as provided above, the Letter Agreement shall remain unchanged.

Executed to be effective as of the date set forth above.



|                                      |  |                    |  |                      |  |                          |  | 
|------------------------------------- |  | ------------------ |  | -------------------- |  | ------------------------ |  | 
|EDDIE BAUER HOLDINGS, INC.            |  |                    |  | EXECUTIVE           
|                                      |  |                    | 
|By:                                   |  | /s/ Freya R. Brier |  |                      |  | /s/ McNeil S. Fiske, Jr.
|Freya R. Brier, Senior Vice President |  |                    |  | McNeil S. Fiske, Jr.
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations or the      Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                        |                         |                           |   |
|-----------------------------|------------------------------|--------------------------------|--------|
| Date:      January 10, 2010 |                         | /s/ Christopher      Bell |   |
|                        | Christopher      Bell        |                           |
|                        | Chief      Executive Officer |                           |
|                        | Chief      Financial Officer |                           |
EXHIBIT
32.1








CERTIFICATION
OF PRESIDENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








CERTIFICATE
OF PRESIDENT





I, Arthur
Davis, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:





(i)       
The accompanying annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(ii)       
The information in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Golden Valley Development. (the
“Company”).





Date: March
      29, 2010
            By:
            /s/ Arthur
      DavisArthur
      DavisDirector/CEO





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request
|                                                                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                    
|View History:                                                                                     
|                                                                                                  
|Percent of Commercial Natural Gas Deliveries in South Carolina Represented by the Price  (Percent)
|                                                                                                  
|                                                                                                  
|Percent of Commercial Natural Gas Deliveries in South Carolina Represented by the Price  (Percent)
|                                                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 97.8   | 98.2   | 98.6   | 99.2   | 98.5   | 96.4   | 99.0   | 98.8   | 97.9   | 97.1  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 98.7   | 97.5   | 98.5   | 96.6   | 96.4   | 96.2   | 95.0   | 94.9   | 94.9   | 93.5  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 92.7   | 91.1   | 90.6   | 91.7   | 92.8   | 91.9   | 91.6   | 91.4   | 92.0   | 91.3  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 90.6   | 89.3   | 90.1   | NA     |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
##### 



(1)
    
    fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of The Lubrizol Corporation.
 /s/ James L. Hambrick

James L. HambrickChief Executive Officer and PresidentNovember 3, 2006
     (1)
    
    fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of The Lubrizol Corporation.
 /s/ Charles P. Cooley

Charles P. CooleyChief Financial OfficerNovember 3, 2006
##### 



(a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;(b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;(c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based upon
such evaluation; and(d)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and(b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 /s/ James L. HambrickJames L. HambrickChief Executive Officer and PresidentAugust 4, 2006
|                                                                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                    
|View History:                                                                                     
|                                                                                                  
|Percent of Commercial Natural Gas Deliveries in North Carolina Represented by the Price  (Percent)
|                                                                                                  
|                                                                                                  
|Percent of Commercial Natural Gas Deliveries in North Carolina Represented by the Price  (Percent)
|                                                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 94.6   | 95.0   | 95.9   | 98.5   | 96.6   | 92.4   | 96.5   | 94.4   | 90.6   | 93.8  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 96.5   | 94.0   | 90.8   | 92.2   | 89.0   | 87.6   | 83.2   | 83.0   | 84.5   | 85.2  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 84.8   | 84.4   | 83.5   | 84.5   | 84.9   | 83.2   | 83.1   | 83.6   | 87.0   | 86.4  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 85.5   | 86.4   | 86.8   | 86.5   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 620 

Designating September 12, 2010, as ‘‘National Day of Encouragement’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 14, 2010 

Mr. PRYOR (for himself and Mrs. LINCOLN) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating September 12, 2010, as ‘‘National Day of 

Encouragement’’. 

Whereas negative images, stories, and influences in the dayto-day lives of Americans can detrimentally affect their 

emotional well-being, interactions with others, and general demeanor; 

Whereas a group of teenagers participating in a leadership 

forum at Harding University in Searcy, Arkansas, identified a lack of encouragement as one of the greatest problems facing young people today; 

Whereas the youth of our Nation need guidance, inspiration, 

and reassurance to counteract this negativity and to develop the qualities of character essential for future leadership in our country; 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 620 ATS 

Whereas a National Day of Encouragement would serve as 

a reminder to counterbalance and overcome negative influences, and would also provide much-needed encouragement and support to others; 

Whereas following the events of September 11, 2001, thousands of people of the United States made sacrifices in 

order to bring help and healing to the victims and their 

families, inspiring and encouraging the Nation; and 

Whereas the renewed feelings of unity, hope, selflessness, and 

encouragement that began on September 12, 2001, are 

the same feelings that the National Day of Encouragement is meant to recapture and spread: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates September 12, 2010, as ‘‘Na3 tional Day of Encouragement’’; 

4 (2) acknowledges the importance of encourage5 ment and positive influences in the lives of all peo6 ple; and 

7 (3) urges the people of the United States to en8 courage others, whether it be through an act of serv9 ice, a thoughtful letter, or words of kindness and in10 spiration, and to thereby boost the morale of all. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
Revised 6/30/05

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	------------

	On [DATE] and [DATE], we notified appellant, in accordance with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this appeal unless the $125 filing fee was paid.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).  Appellant has not paid the $125 filing fee.  See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).

	Because appellant has failed to comply with a requirement of the rules of appellate procedure and the Texas Supreme Court’s order of July 21, 1998,2 we dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

	Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL D:

DELIVERED:

	COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-05-325-CV

ChHaArRlLeEsS HeEnNrRyY MyYeErRsS	APPELLANT

	V.

ThHeE HoOnNaAOrRaAbBlLeE BaArRbBaArRaA FeErRrReElLlL	APPELLEE

	------------

	FROM COUNTY THE COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF  TARRANT COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	------------

	On sSeptember 69, 2005 ___________ and September 22, 2005, __________, we notified appellant, in accordance with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this appeal unless the $125 filing fee was paid.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).  Appellant has not paid the $125 filing fee.  See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).

	Because appellant has failed to comply with a requirement of the rules of appellate procedure and the Texas Supreme Court's order of July 21, 1998,2 we dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

	Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d)43.4..

								PER CURIAM

PANEL D:  WALKER, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and MCCOY, J.

DELIVERED:  cOoCTOBEROctober 13, 2005
112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 132 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 
2 

•HCON 132 EH 

1 SECTION 1. FUNDING TO ENSURE PRODUCTION OF AU2 THORIZED NUMBER OF COPIES OF REVISED 

3 VERSION OF ‘‘HISPANIC AMERICANS IN CON4 GRESS’’. 

5 Notwithstanding section 2(b) of House Concurrent 

6 Resolution 90, One Hundred Seventh Congress (agreed to 

7 December 7, 2001), in printing the updated version of 

8 House Document 103–299, entitled ‘‘Hispanic Americans 

9 in Congress’’ (as revised by the Library of Congress), the 

10 Public Printer shall print the maximum number of copies 

11 of such Document for which the total printing and produc12 tion costs do not exceed an amount equal to the amount 

13 provided for under such section, increased by $700,000. 

14 SEC. 2. ELECTRONIC PUBLICATION OF CERTAIN HOUSE 

15 DOCUMENTS. 

16 (a) ELECTRONIC PUBLICATION.—Upon request of 

17 the Committee on House Administration of the House of 

18 Representatives, the Public Printer shall publish and dis19 seminate an electronic version of each of the House docu20 ments referred to in subsection (b), under the direction 

21 of the Committee. 

22 (b) DOCUMENTS DESCRIBED.—The House docu23 ments referred to in this subsection are as follows: 

24 (1) The updated version of House Document 

25 103–299, entitled ‘‘Hispanic Americans in Con26 gress’’, as described in section 1. 
3 

•HCON 132 EH 

1 (2) House Document 108–223, entitled 

2 ‘‘Women in Congress, 1917–2006’’. 

3 (3) House Document 108–224, entitled ‘‘Black 

4 Americans in Congress, 1870–2007’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 10, 

2012. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 132 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Providing funding to ensure the printing and proand for other purposes. ment entitled ‘‘Hispanic Americans in Congress’’, revised and updated version of the House docu- duction of the authorized number of copies of the
#### State v. Osborn

106,743

09/04/13

Denied.

Unpublished
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                    5
<CIK>                                        0000819479
<NAME>                                       COMPUTONE

<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            APR-03-1998
<PERIOD-START>                               APR-05-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                 JUL-04-1997
<CASH>                                                 154
<SECURITIES>                                         2,923
<RECEIVABLES>                                        2,923
<ALLOWANCES>                                          (514)
<INVENTORY>                                          4,600
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     7,384
<PP&E>                                               3,802
<DEPRECIATION>                                       3,589
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       8,346
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                4,170
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                68
<OTHER-SE>                                           3,791
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         8,346
<SALES>                                              3,494
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     3,494
<CGS>                                                2,121
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        3,355
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         2
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      26
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        111
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    111
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                           111
<EPS-BASIC>                                         0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.02


</TABLE>
# C_2019231EN.01000102.xml

| 9.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 231/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 231/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9384 — Sumitomo Corporation/Nippon Steel Corporation/Standard Steel Holdings)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 231/02)

On 1 July 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9384. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9384. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---