alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 4.13

                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

AGREEMENT dated 18 September, 2002.

BETWEEN    METAL STORM Inc

                                                                     (`Company')

AND        G. RUSSELL ZINK
                                                                    (`Employee')

On behalf of the Board of Directors of Metal Storm, I am pleased to extend to
you an offer of employment with Metal Storm as the Senior Vice President of
Business Development. The terms of employment are as follows:

Salary: $165,000 base with 50% prioritised targeted annual bonus based on
defined KPI's. (key performance indicators)

The KPI's are to be settled by 14 October 2002. The Chief Corporate Officer
(CCO) will review performance KPI's and provide feedback at least each 6 months.

Stock options: 200,000 options will be made available at the rate of 12,500
options per quarter, issued quarterly in arrears over 4 years. The issue price
is to be fixed at the average closing price on the ASX for the 5 trading days
prior to the first date of employment. Options may be exercised with Board
approval. Options expire in three years from date of issue.

Other options may be issued by the board for outstanding performance.

If there is a change of control of Metal Storm all options yet to issue up to
200,000 will vest on the date that the change of control occurs at the set issue
price.

Senior Vice President of Business Development will report to the CCO.

You may continue to serve on the board of the World Trade Center Institute in
Baltimore.

Parking and computer support will be provided to you by the company.

Required international travel is to be business class.

You may participate in the company medical, dental, insurance and 401(k) program
as each of these programs is added to the benefits package for the company.

Recreational leave is 4 weeks per annum accrued as earned. Leave taken is to be
taken to fit company objectives.

Housing allowance or relocation provisions are not provided.

Start date: Monday, September 30, 2002

<PAGE>

We are extremely pleased to have you join Metal Storm. The capabilities and
experience you will add to our company will be significant in moving us forward
in meeting our strategic and operational goals.

If you should have any additional questions, please contact me at 703 248-8218.
We look forward to your concurrence of this offer at your earliest convenience.

Sincerely,

/s/ Charles A Vehlow

Charles A Vehlow

Chief Corporate Officer

                                                        CONCUR

                                                        /s/ G. Russell Zink
                                                        -------------------
                                                        G. Russell Zink
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Appellate case name: In re Kenny Bates d/b/a Bates Backhoe Service

Appellate case number: 01-13-00037-CV

Trial court case number: 11-CV-0328

Trial court: 212th District Court, Galveston County, Texas

Real Party in Interest, Jacob Walker, moved to extend the time to file his response to the

petition for writ of mandamus filed by relator, Kenny Bates d/b/a Bates Backhoe Service, and to

stay proceedings in the trial court pending this Court’s ruling on the mandamus petition. We

grant the motion.

It is ordered that real party in interest’s response 1S due Monday, March 4, 2013

The Court stays, until further order of this Court, the underlying proceedings in Jacob

Walker v. Kenny Bates d/b/a Bates Backhoe Service, No. 11-CV-0328 (212th Dist. Ct.,

Galveston Cnty., Tex.). See TEX. R. APP. P 52.10(b).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature /s/Evenlyn V. Keyes

[] Acting individually [] Acting for the Court

Date: February 4, 2013
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**SECTION 302CERTIFICATION**

 

I, James R. Swartwout, certifythat:

 

1.             I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q ofSumma Industries;

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this Quarterly Report;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this Report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Quarterly Report;

 

4.             The registrant’s other certifying officers and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)), for the registrantand we have:

 

(a)           designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this Quarterly Reportis being prepared;

 

(b)           evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this Quarterly Report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)           Disclosed in this Quarterly Report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

 

5.             The registrant’s other certifying officers and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

(a)           all significant deficiencies in the design or operation ofinternal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

(b)           any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 

 
|   | /s/ James R. Swartwout   |   |
|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   |                     |
|   | James R.  Swartwout      |
|   | Chief  Executive Officer |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer |
|   | April 7,  2004           |

 

----
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

OFFICE OF

CHEMICAL SAFETY AND

POLLUTION PREVENTION

MEMORANDUM

Date: 4 June 2015

SUBJECT: Fluensulfone – Human Health Risk Impact of the Revised Tolerance 

Recommendation for Tomato Paste.

PC Code: 050410 DP Barcode: D427631

Decision No.: 505068 Registration No.: 66222-243

Petition No.: 5F8365 Regulatory Action: Section 3

Risk Assessment Type: Single Chemical Aggregate Case No.: None

TXR No.: NA CAS No.: 318290-98-1

MRID No.: 49556801 40 CFR: 180.680

FROM: Michael A. Doherty, Ph.D., Senior Chemist

Risk Assessment Branch II (RAB II)

Health Effects Division (HED; 7509P)

THROUGH: Christina Swartz, Chief

RAB II 

HED (7509P)

TO: Rita Kumar/Mark Suarez/Meredith Laws

Invertebrate and Vertebrate Branch 3

Registration Division (7505P)

The new nematicide fluensulfone was recently evaluated under a global joint review project,

with Canada and Australia, for use on cucurbit and fruiting vegetables (crop groups 9 and 8-10, 

respectively). In the human health risk assessment (D403767, 18 June 2014; D422674, 4 

September 2014), HED concluded that a tolerance for residues of fluensulfone in/on both crop 

groups was supported at 0.5 ppm, and tolerances were established in September 2014 (40 CFR 

180.680). Based on the information available to the Agency at that time, separate tolerances for 

residues in processed tomato products were not established. 

Recently, the Agency received a new tomato processing study which demonstrates concentration 

of BSA to a degree that warrants a separate tolerance for residues in tomato paste, at 1.0 ppm 

(see D427654, M. Doherty, 4 June 2015).
Fluensulfone D427631

Page 2 of 2

HED Conclusions

In food commodities, dietary risk assessments for fluensulfone are based on residues of the 

parent compound only. Since residues of fluensulfone did not show concentration in any 

processed tomato commodities, a new risk assessment is not necessary to support a new

tolerance for residues in tomato paste. Typically, HED is concerned when risk estimates exceed 

100% of a population-adjusted dose. In the previous assessment (D403767, 18 June 2014), 

aggregate risk estimates were less than 10% of population-adjusted doses for all population 

groups for both acute and chronic exposure.

There are no risk issues that would preclude establishing a permanent tolerance for residues of 

fluensulfone in/on tomato, paste at 1.0 ppm.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 79 (Friday, April 24, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20421-20422]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10951]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
(AZ-917/AZ-060; AZA 28350)


Notice of Availability of the Decision Record for the White 
Canyon Plan Amendment/Environmental Assessment for the Phoenix Resource 
Management Plan, Pinal County, AZ

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The State Director has approved that portion of the proposed 
plan amendment for the designation and management of the White Canyon 
Area of Critical Environmental Concern (ACEC). In compliance with the 
Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, as amended, and Section 
102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, the plan 
amendment revises designation and management decisions made through the 
Phoenix Resource Management Plan (RMP). The proposed modification to 
land tenure designations have been set aside and will be integrated 
with an environmental impact statement under preparation for the 
proposed Ray Land Exchange.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shela McFarlin, Project Manager, 
Bureau of Land Management, Arizona State Office, 222 North Central 
Avenue, Phoenix, AZ 85004, or telephone (602) 417-9568.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Decision Record will amend the Phoenix 
RMP to modify the White Canyon ACEC designation as follows: (1) 300 
non-wilderness federal acres will be retained as the White Canyon ACEC 
(within T3S, R12E, Section 23, NE \1/4\ and Section 25, NW \1/4\); (2) 
1,620 wilderness acres formerly designated as ACEC will continue to be 
managed as wilderness under all appropriate guidelines, but will cease 
to be designated as ACEC; and, (3) BLM will seek to acquire 480 acres 
in Section 24 (T3S, R12E) to be managed upon acquisition as ACEC. 
Acquisition will be from the state of Arizona or subsequent land owners 
through appropriate mechanisms such as donation, friendly condemnation 
or exchange. New ACEC management prescriptions will replace the Phoenix 
RMP management actions and a coordinated resource management plan will 
be completed. Motorized travel will be limited to designated roads and 
trails. Surface occupancy for oil and gas leasing will be prohibited. 
The plan will

[[Page 20422]]

evaluate whether any ACEC areas not already under mining claims should 
be withdrawn.
    Public reading copies may be reviewed at the following BLM 
locations:

Arizona State Office, 222 North Central Avenue, Phoenix, Arizona 85004
Tucson Field Office, 12661 East Broadway, Tucson, Arizona 85748-7208
Phoenix Field Office, 2015 West Deer Valley Road, Phoenix, Arizona 
85027.

    Dated: April 17, 1998.
Lonna O'Neal,
Acting State Director.
[FR Doc. 98-10951 Filed 4-23-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-91-P
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Kanai Sciences, Inc. (the "Company") on
      Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael Weiser,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/Michael
                  WeiserMichael
                  WeiserPrincipal
                  Executive Officer
                February
                  20, 2007
H. Con. Res. 27 Agreed to March 16, 2011

One Hundred Twelfth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the fifth day of January, two thousand and eleven 

Concurrent Resolution 

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 

SECTION 1. ACCEPTANCE OF STATUE OF GERALD R. FORD FROM THE 

PEOPLE OF MICHIGAN FOR PLACEMENT IN UNITED 

STATES CAPITOL. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—The statue of Gerald R. Ford furnished by 

the people of Michigan for placement in the United States Capitol 

in accordance with section 1814 of the Revised Statutes of the 

United States (2 U.S.C. 2131), is accepted in the name of the 

United States, and the thanks of the Congress are tendered to 

the people of Michigan for providing this commemoration of one 

of Michigan’s most eminent persons. 

(b) PRESENTATION CEREMONY.—The State of Michigan is 

authorized to use the Rotunda of the Capitol on May 3, 2011, 

for a presentation ceremony for the statue accepted under this 

section. The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board 

shall take such action as may be necessary with respect to physical 

preparations and security for the ceremony. 

(c) DISPLAY IN ROTUNDA.—The Architect of the Capitol shall 

provide for the display of the statue accepted under this section 

in the Rotunda of the Capitol, in accordance with the procedures 

described in section 311(e) of the Legislative Branch Appropriations 

Act, 2001 (2 U.S.C. 2132(e)). 

Attest: 

Clerk of the House of Representatives. 

Attest: 

Secretary of the Senate.
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

EXHIBIT 10.8  


EXHIBIT B

TO LOAN AGREEMENT  


 
 

NOTICE OF BORROWING    
    
                          , 2003    
    


Lilly
Beter Capital Group, Ltd.

3925 Excelsior Blvd., Suite 500

Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416 


        The
undersigned, 3eee, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), refers to the Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of July 5, 2003 (as
amended or modified from time to time, the "Loan Agreement"), among the Company, as borrower, and Lilly Beter Capital Group, Ltd., as lender (the
"Lender"). Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Loan Agreement. 


        The
Company hereby gives you notice pursuant to Section 2.2 of the Loan Agreement that it requests an Advance on the terms set forth below: 



	(a)
	The
aggregate principal amount of the requested Advance is $                  . 




        Delivery
of an executed counterpart of this Notice of Borrowing by telecopier will be effective as delivery of an original executed counterpart of this Notice of Borrowing. 



	 	 	Very truly yours,
	

 	
 	
3eee, Inc.
	

 	
 	

By:	
 	

          

	 	 	Name:	 	          

	 	 	Title:	 	          












QuickLinks


NOTICE OF BORROWING , 2003
#### State v. Herrera

107,125

08/19/13

Denied.

Unpublished
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 73 (Thursday, April 16, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 18939]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10096]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES


National Endowment for the Arts; Leadership Initiatives Panel

    Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Public Law 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that a meeting 
of the Leadership Initiatives Panel (Millennium/Media Section) to the 
National Council on the Arts will meet on May 6, 1998. The panel will 
meet from 10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. in Room 716 at the Nancy Hanks 
Center, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC, 20506.
    This meeting is for the purpose of application evaluation, under 
the National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities Act of 1965, as 
amended, including discussion of information given in confidence to the 
Agency by grant applicants.
    In accordance with the determination of the Chairman of March 31, 
1997, these sessions will be closed to the public pursuant to 
subsection (c) (4) and (6) of section 552b of Title 5, United States 
Code.
    Further information with reference to this meeting can be obtained 
from Ms. Kathy Plowitz-Worden, Panel Coordinator, National Endowment 
for the Arts, Washington, DC 20506, or call (202) 682-5691,

    Dated: April 10, 1998.
Kathy Plowitz-Worden,
Panel Coordinator, National Endowment for the Arts.
[FR Doc. 98-10096 Filed 4-15-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-M
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 18, 2019

No. 04-19-00141-CR

Mark A. KRIST,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CR5258

The Honorable Jennifer Pena, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The trial court’s certification in this appeal states “this criminal case is a plea-bargain 

case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” The clerk’s record contains a written plea 

bargain, and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the 

prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant; Rule 25.2(a)(2) applies. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

25.2(a)(2).

This court must dismiss this appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has a right 

of appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules.” Id. R. 25.2(d); see Chavez v. 

State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). 

We ORDER Appellant to cause an amended trial court certification to be filed in this 

court within TWENTY days of the date of this order showing Appellant has the right of appeal. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d), 37.1; see also Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 

2005); Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, no pet.). If no 

amended trial court certification is filed as ordered, this appeal will be dismissed. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 25.2(d).

All other appellate deadlines are SUSPENDED pending further order of this court.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 18th day of March, 2019.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 76 (Tuesday, April 21, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 19757]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10531]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[NAFTA-2089, 2089A, 2089B]


Newell Company, Acme Frame--a/k/a Intercraft, Harrisburg, 
Arkansas; Mundelein, Illinois, Waukegan, Illinois; Amended 
Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment 
Assistance

    In accordance with Section 250(A), Subchapter D, Chapter 2, Title 
II, of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor 
issued a Certification for NAFTA Transitional Adjustment Assistance on 
February 17, 1998, applicable to all workers of Newell Company, Acme 
Frame--a/k/a Intercraft, Harrisburg, Arkansas. The notice was published 
in the Federal Register on March 16, 1998 (63 FR 12838).
    At the request of the company, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. New information provided 
by the company shows that worker separations will occur at the subject 
firms' Mundelein and Waukegan, Illinois locations when they close on 
March 31 and April 30, 1998, respectively. Workers at the Mundelein, 
Illinois location are engaged in the production of picture frames. 
Workers at the Waukegan, Illinois location provide distribution 
services for the production facilities of Newell Company, Acme Frame--
a/k/a Intercraft.
    Accordingly, the Department is amending the certification to cover 
workers at the subject firms' Mundelein and Waukegan, Illinois 
locations.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of Newell Company, Acme Frame--a/k/a Intercraft adversely 
affected by imports from Mexico and Canada.
    The amended notice applicable to NAFTA-2089 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Newell Company, Acme Frame Division, a/k/a 
Intercraft, Harrisburg, Arkansas (NAFTA-2089), Mundelein, Illinois 
(NAFTA-2089A) and Waukegan, Illinois (NAFTA-2089B) who became 
totally or partially separated from employment on or after December 
18, 1996 are eligible to apply for NAFTA-TAA under Section 250 of 
the Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, D.C., this 2nd day of April 1998.
Grant D. Beale,
Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 98-10531 Filed 4-20-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
#### COM. v. MILINSKI, B.

3838 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/19/2017

CP-45-CR-0001044-2013 (Monroe)

Affirmed
#### State v. Williams

106,565

09/04/13

Denied.

Unpublished
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk February 26, 2010

s0222 

# Order

February 26, 2010

139951

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 139951 COA: 293399 Wayne CC: 08-006100-FH NICHOLAS WILLIAM HOUGAS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the September 29, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.