alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> OPUR1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    178225000
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                   23292000
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                        54126000
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       1246000
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               256889000
<COMMON>                                     166676000
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            7717000
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               174393000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                          33750000
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  3571000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                45175000
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                256889000
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    102661000
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                          12634000
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                           0
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                    61103000
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                       25902000
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             5239000
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                31141000
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       3012000
<NET-INCOME>                                  18507000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                 18507000
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       8789000
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                        32785000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 630 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 630

       Designating November 28, 2010, as ``Drive Safer Sunday''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 20, 2010

 Mr. Isakson (for himself, Mr. Chambliss, and Ms. Klobuchar) submitted 
      the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
       Designating November 28, 2010, as ``Drive Safer Sunday''.

Whereas motor vehicle travel is the primary means of transportation in the 
        United States;
Whereas every individual traveling on the roads and highways needs to drive in a 
        safer manner in order to reduce deaths and injuries that result from 
        motor vehicle accidents;
Whereas according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, wearing 
        a seat belt saves more than 15,000 lives each year;
Whereas the Senate wants all people of the United States to understand the life-
        saving importance of wearing a seat belt and encourages motorists to 
        drive safely, not just during the holiday season, but every time they 
        get behind the wheel; and
Whereas the Sunday after Thanksgiving is the busiest highway traffic day of the 
        year: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) encourages--
                    (A) high schools, colleges, universities, 
                administrators, teachers, primary schools, and 
                secondary schools to launch campus-wide educational 
                campaigns to urge students to be focused on safety when 
                driving;
                    (B) national trucking firms to alert their drivers 
                to be especially focused on driving safely on the 
                Sunday after Thanksgiving, and to publicize the 
                importance of the day through use of Citizen's Band 
                (``CB'') radios and truck stops across the Nation;
                    (C) clergy to remind their members to travel safely 
                when attending services and gatherings;
                    (D) law enforcement personnel to remind drivers and 
                passengers to drive safely, particularly on the Sunday 
                after Thanksgiving; and
                    (E) all people of the United States to use the 
                Sunday after Thanksgiving as an opportunity to educate 
                themselves about highway safety; and
            (2) designates November 28, 2010, as ``Drive Safer 
        Sunday''.
                                 <all>
```
# 2007
112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 13 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Whereas ‘‘In God We Trust’’ is the official motto of the 

United States; 

Whereas the sentiment, ‘‘In God We Trust’’, has been an integral part of United States society since its founding; 

Whereas in times of national challenge or tragedy, the people 

of the United States have turned to God as 
2 

•HCON 13 EH 

their source for sustenance, protection, wisdom, strength, 

and direction; 

Whereas the Declaration of Independence recognizes God, our 

Creator, as the source of our rights, ‘‘We hold these 

truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, 

that they are endowed by their Creator with certain 

unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and 

the pursuit of happiness.’’; 

Whereas the national anthem of the United States says 

‘‘praise the power that hath made and preserved us a nation * * * and this be our motto: in God is our trust.’’; 

Whereas the words ‘‘In God We Trust’’ appear over the entrance to the Senate Chamber and above the Speaker’s 

rostrum in the House Chamber; 

Whereas the oath taken by all Federal employees, except the 

President, states ‘‘I will well and faithfully discharge the 

duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help 

me God.’’; 

Whereas John Adams said, ‘‘Statesmen may plan and speculate for Liberty, but it is Religion and Morality alone, 

which can establish the Principles upon which Freedom 

can securely stand.’’; 

Whereas if religion and morality are taken out of the marketplace of ideas, the very freedom on which the United 

States was founded cannot be secured; 

Whereas as President Eisenhower said and President Ford 

later repeated, ‘‘Without God, there could be no American form of government, nor, an American way of life.’’; 

and 
3 

•HCON 13 EH 

Whereas President John F. Kennedy said, ‘‘The guiding principle and prayer of this Nation has been, is now, and ever 

shall be ‘In God We Trust.’ ’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That Congress reaffirms ‘‘In God We Trust’’ 

3 as the official motto of the United States and supports 

4 and encourages the public display of the national motto 

5 in all public buildings, public schools, and other govern6 ment institutions. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 1, 

2011. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 13 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Reaffirming ‘‘In God We Trust’’ as the official 

other government institutions. motto in all public buildings, public schools, and encouraging the public display of the national motto of the United States and supporting and
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Kenneth A. Shewer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of World Monitor Trust IIISeries J for the period January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ Kenneth A. Shewer        
|Kenneth A. Shewer            
|Co-Chief Executive Officer   
|(Principal Executive Officer)

Date: May 6, 2008
#### State v. Long

107,758

08/29/13

Denied. .

Unpublished
## United States Court of App eals F O R T H E E I G H T H

C I R C U I T

__ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 1- 24 65

__ __ __ __ __ _ Dav id Ant ho ny Steb bi ns , * * App el la nt , * * App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S ta te s v. * Dis tri ct Co ur t fo r th e Weste rn * Dis tri ct of Ark an sa s. Uni ve rs it y

of Ark an sa s; * Offi ce o f th e Ch an cel lo r, * [UNPUBLISHED] * App el le es . *

__ __ __ __ __ _ Su bm it te d: Octo be r 25 , 20 11 Fil ed : No ve m

be r 10 , 20 11

__ __ __ __ __ _ Befo re LOKEN, BYE, an d C OLLOTO N, Circ ui t J ud ge s.

__ __ __ __ __ _ PER CURI AM.

Dav id Ant ho ny St eb bi ns ap pe al s th e di stri ct co ur t’s or de rs de nyin g hi s m ot io n 1 to co n f i r m an arb it rat io n award , an d hi s rel at ed m ot io n fo r reco ns id erat io n. The in st an t ap pe al is un ti m el y as St eb bi ns ’s n ot ic e of ap pe al was no t fil ed wi t h i n t h i rty da y s aft er th e o r d e r ap pe al ed fro m was en te red

. See Fed

. R. App

. P. 4( a)(1 )(A); Dies er v. Co nt ’l Cas

. Co ., 44 0 F.3 d 92 0, 92 3 (8 th Ci r. 20 06 ) (ti m el y no ti ce of ap pe al

The Hon or ab le Ji m

m Larry Hen dr en , Ch ie f Ju dg e, Uni te d St at es D ist ri ct Cour t 1 fo r th e Weste rn Dis tri ct of Ark an sa s.is m an da to ry an d juri sd ic ti on al ). The ap pe al is di sm is se d fo r la ck of juri sd ic ti on . See 8t h C ir. R . 47 B.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2

-
#### ATLANTIC CASUALTY INS. CO. v. ZYMBLOSKY, E.

1167 MDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/17/2017

2015 CV 01571 (Lackawanna)

Affirmed
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  113,164
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,991
<INVENTORY>                                     10,227
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               149,246
<PP&E>                                         182,066
<DEPRECIATION>                                  67,537
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 930,524
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          221,605
<BONDS>                                        531,599
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           358
<OTHER-SE>                                     141,137
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   930,524
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               311,282
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  180,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                95,395
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   762
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              27,868
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,256
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (7,764)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,492
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,492
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
|                                                                                            
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                              
|View History:                                                                               
|                                                                                            
|Percent of Industrial Natural Gas Deliveries in New York Represented by the Price  (Percent)
|                                                                                            
|                                                                                            
|Percent of Industrial Natural Gas Deliveries in New York Represented by the Price  (Percent)
|                                                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 12.7   | 8.3    | 14.3  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 11.3   | 10.8   | 11.0   | 10.6   | 10.7   | 14.7   | 11.7   | 12.3   | 11.4   | 11.7  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 10.6   | 7.9    | 6.8    | 6.3    | 6.1    | 6.2    | 5.8    | 5.8    | 5.8    | 5.8   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 5.3    | 5.2    | 4.9    | 5.0    |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
Exhibit 32.1



Statement of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code as adopted

Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United
States Code as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, John Aglialoro, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Cybex International, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that:



The Companys Form 10-Q Quarterly Report for the period ended September
25, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: November 2, 2004



/s/ John AglialoroJohn AglialoroChairman and Chief Executive Officer




A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS
WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO CYBEX INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY CYBEX INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND WILL BE FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
# C_2021158EN.01002301.xml

| 30.4.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 158/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 158/23

---

P8_TA(2019)0392

Drafting or amendment of the title of a resolution tabled to wind up a debate (interpretation of Rule 149a(2) of the Rules of Procedure)

European Parliament decision of 17 April 2019 concerning the drafting or amendment of the title of a resolution tabled to wind up a debate (interpretation of Rule 149a(2) of the Rules of Procedure) (2019/2020(REG))

(2021/C 158/06)

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to the letter of 3 April 2019 from the Chair of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the letter of 3 April 2019 from the Chair of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs,

| — | having regard to Rule 226 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 226 of its Rules of Procedure,

| 1. | Decides to append the following interpretation to Rule 149a(2) of the Rules of Procedure: |
| --- | --- |

1.

‘The drafting or amendment of the title of a resolution tabled to wind up a debate under Rules 123, 128 or 135 does not constitute a change to the agenda, provided that the title remains within the scope of the subject being debated.’

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and the Commission, for information. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and the Commission, for information.

---
# C_2019362EN.01000301.xml

| 28.10.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 362/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.10.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 362/3

---

Opinion (1) of the Advisory Committee on mergers at its meeting of 26 June 2019 concerning a preliminary draft decision relating to Case M.8179 — Canon/TMSC — Article 14(2) procedure

Canon/Toshiba Medical Systems Corporation

Rapporteur: United Kingdom

(2019/C 362/03)

1.

The Advisory Committee (12 Member States) agrees with the Commission’s assessment that Canon partially implemented, within the meaning of Article 4(1) of the Merger Regulation (Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004), its acquisition of control over TMSC by carrying out the Interim Transaction (as defined in the draft decision) prior to its notification to the Commission, which took place on 12 August 2016.

2.

The Advisory Committee (12 Member States) agrees with the Commission’s assessment that Canon partially implemented, within the meaning of Article 7(1) of the Merger Regulation (Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004), its acquisition of control over TMSC by carrying out the Interim Transaction (as defined in the draft decision) prior to its notification to the Commission, which took place on 12 August 2016, and prior to its clearance by the Commission, which took place on 19 September 2016.

3.

The Advisory Committee (12 Member States) agrees with the Commission’s assessment that Canon has at least negligently infringed Article 4(1) of the Merger Regulation (Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004).

4.

The Advisory Committee (12 Member States) agrees with the Commission’s assessment that Canon has at least negligently infringed Article 7(1) of the Merger Regulation (Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004).

5.

The Advisory Committee (12 Member States) agrees with the Commission that Canon should be fined pursuant to Article 14(2)(a) of the Merger Regulation (Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004).

6.

The Advisory Committee (12 Member States) agrees with the Commission that Canon should be fined pursuant to Article 14(2)(b) of the Merger Regulation (Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004).

7.

The Advisory Committee (12 Member States) recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union.

---
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 10 (Thursday, January 15, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 2444]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1007]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

The Bureau of Consular Affairs
[Public Notice 2704]


Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection 
Comment Request

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: 60-Day Notice of Proposed Information Collection; DSP-19, 
Passport Amendment/Validation Application.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of State is seeking Office of Management and 
Budget (OMB) approval for the information collection described below. 
The purpose of this is to allow 60 days for public comment in the 
Federal Register preceding submission to OMB. This process is conducted 
in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
    The following summarizes the information collection proposal 
submitted to OMB:
    Type of Request: Reinstatement, without change, of a previously 
approved collection for which approval has expired.
    Originating Office: The Bureau of Consular Affairs.
    Title of Information Collection: Passport Amendment/Validation 
Application.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Form Number: DSP-19.
    Respondents: U.S. Citizens.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 150,000.
    Average Hours Per Response: 15 minutes.
    Total Estimated Burden: 37,500.
    Public comments are being solicited to permit the agency to--
    <bullet> Evaluate whether the proposed information collection is 
necessary for the proper performance of the agency functions.
    <bullet> Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the 
burden of the proposed collection.
    <bullet> Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the 
information to be collected.
    <bullet> Minimize the reporting burden on those who are to respond, 
including through the use of automated collection techniques or other 
forms of technology.

FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CONTACT:
Comments regarding the collection listed in this notice or requests for 
copies of the proposed collection and supporting documents should be 
directed to Charles S. Cunningham, Directives Management Branch, U.S. 
Department of State, Washington, DC 20520, (202) 647-0596.

    Dated: December 23, 1997.
Glen H. Johnson,
Acting Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-1007 Filed 1-14-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-06-M
#### State v. White

111,290

07/22/2015

Denied

Unpublished
#### State v. Dotson

109,358

07/22/2015

Denied

Unpublished