alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
S95A0493.

#### LESTER v. THE STATE.

(457 SE2d 673)

Hunt, Chief Justice.

Janice Lester drove the getaway car for William Luther Smith in *446the armed robbery of a supermarket during which Smith killed a supermarket employee and shot and wounded a customer.1 She was sentenced to life imprisonment for murder and 20 years imprisonment on both the armed robbery and aggravated assault convictions, to be served concurrently.2 She appeals and we affirm.

Decided June 5, 1995.

*Richard O. Ward,*for appellant.

*Daniel J. Craig, District Attorney, Charles R. Sheppard, Assistant District Attorney, Michael J. Bowers, Attorney General, Susan V. Boleyn, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Michael D. Groves,*
      *447
      *Assistant Attorney General,*for appellee.

*4461. After reviewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the jury’s determination of guilt, we conclude that a rational trier of fact could have found the defendant guilty of the crimes charged. *Jackson v. Virginia,*443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979).

2. We find no merit to Lester’s argument that the trial court erred in admitting her statement into evidence. Following the hearing on Lester’s motion to suppress, the trial court found that Lester was not in custody when officers initially questioned her about the crime; that she was arrested after she made incriminating admissions to the officers; that the officers promptly gave Lester her *Miranda*warnings; and that, thereafter, Lester waived her rights and gave her statement freely and voluntarily. Because Lester has not demonstrated that those findings are clearly erroneous, we are bound to accept them, and we find no error in the trial court’s admission into evidence of Lester’s statement. *Baldwin v. State,*263 Ga. 524, 525 (1) (435 SE2d 926) (1993).

3. We reject Lester’s suggestion that we overrule our holding in *Gibbons v. State,*248 Ga. 858 (286 SE2d 717) (1982) and we find no error in the trial court’s admission of Smith’s prior inconsistent statement into evidence.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

Following the trial in his case, in which the state sought the death penalty, Smith was convicted of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment.

The crimes were committed on November 4, 1987. The Richmond County grand jury indicted Lester on January 29, 1991, for malice murder and felony murder (with the underlying felony of aggravated assault of Patrick Patterson, the employee) and armed robbery and aggravated assault of Emil Sack, a customer. She was tried before a jury January 6-8, 1992, and the jury returned a verdict of guilty on the felony murder, armed robbery and aggravated assault charges. Lester filed her motion for new trial on February 21, 1992, amended it on February 2, 1993, and the trial court denied it on October 3, 1994. She filed her notice of appeal on October 31, 1994. The appeal was docketed in this court on December 19, 1994, and it was submitted for decision, without oral argument, on February 20, 1995.
I, Gary J. Wolter, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MGE Energy, Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this
report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e), for
the registrant and have:

a.	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented
in this report for conclusions about the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

c.	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting
that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a.	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial; and

b.	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

|/s/ Gary J. Wolter                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
        November 13, 2003
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 73 (Thursday, April 16, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 18945]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10112]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD


Proposed Collection; Comment Request

SUMMARY: In accordance with the requirement of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 which provides opportunity for 
public comment on new or revised data collections, the Railroad 
Retirement Board (RRB) will publish periodic summaries of proposed data 
collections.

Comments are Invited on

    (a) Whether the proposed information collection is necessary for 
the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including 
whether the information has practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the 
RRB's estimate of the burden of the collection of the information; (c) 
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to 
be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden related to the 
collection of information on respondents, including the use of 
automated collection techniques or other forms of information 
technology.

Title and Purpose of Information Collection

Pay Rate Report; OMB 3220-0097
    Under Section 2(a) of the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act, the 
daily benefit rate for unemployment and sickness benefits depends on 
the claimant's last daily rate of pay in the base year. The procedures 
pertaining to the use of a claimant's daily pay rate in determining the 
daily benefit rate are prescribed in 20 CFR 330.
    The RRB utilities form UI-1e, Request for Pay Rate Information, to 
obtain information from a claimant about their last railroad employer 
and pay rate, when it is not available from other RRB records. Form UI-
1e also explains the possibility of receiving a higher daily benefit 
rate if a claimant reports their daily rate of pay for railroad work in 
the base year. Completion is required to obtain or retain benefits. One 
response is requested of each respondent.
    The RRB proposes to revise Form UI-1e to add language required by 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. Non-burden impacting reformatting 
and editorial changes are also proposed. The completion time for Form 
UI-1e is estimated at 5 minutes per response.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To request more information or to 
obtain a copy of the information collection justification, forms, and/
or supporting material, please call the RRB Clearance Officer at (312) 
751-3363. Comments regarding the information collection should be 
addressed to Ronald J. Hodapp, Railroad Retirement Board, 844 N. Rush 
Street, Chicago, Illinois 60611-2092. Written comments should be 
received within 60 days of this notice.
Chuck Mierzwa,
Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-10112 Filed 4-15-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7905-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.1  Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002   In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MGE Energy, Inc., for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, Gary J. Wolter, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    /s/ Gary J. Wolter Gary J. Wolter Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer Date: November 9, 2007
Exhibit 31

                           Long Beach Securities Corp.

                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

                      LONG BEACH MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2005-WL3
                            ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES
                                  SERIES 2005-WL3

      I, Michael J. Giampaolo, an Executive Vice President of Long Beach
Securities Corp., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K
containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods
included in the year covered by this annual report, of Long Beach Mortgage Loan
Trust 2005-WL3, Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2005-WL3;

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole,
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to
be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and servicing, or
similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance statement included in
the report and required to be delivered to the trustee in accordance with the
terms of the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, and except as
disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the
servicing agreement; and

5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the servicer's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report provided
by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance
with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar
procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement,
that is included in these reports.

Dated as of March 1, 2006

                                                  /s/ Michael J. Giampaolo
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Michael J. Giampaolo
                                                Executive Vice President and COO
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 1999, AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS
ENDED MARCH 31, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           8,304
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  307,411
<ALLOWANCES>                                    40,783
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               298,259
<PP&E>                                         221,505
<DEPRECIATION>                                 136,814
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 732,451
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          264,772
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    292,786
<COMMON>                                     4,991,739
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   732,451
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,510
<CGS>                                               62
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  803,256
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               170,631
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,713
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (961,254)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (961,254)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)
        

</TABLE>
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2019212EN.01000301.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 24.6.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 212/3 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9404 — Goldman Sachs/B&B Hotels)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 212/03)

1.

On 17 June 2019, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2019212EN.01000301-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | The Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (‘Goldman Sachs,’ USA), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Financière Sun SAS (‘Financière Sun,’ France), operating the B&B Hotels chain, controlled by PAI Partners. |

Goldman Sachs acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Financière Sun, the owner of the B&B Hotels chain.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for Goldman Sachs: a global investment banking, securities and investment management firm. One of Goldman Sachs’ controlled portfolio companies is K+K Hotels, a boutique hotel company that operates ten hotels in eight cities in the EU: Munich, Vienna, Prague, Barcelona, London, Paris, Budapest and Bucharest,

—   for Financière Sun: operates the B&B Hotels chain. B&B Hotels is a French hotel company headquartered in Brest, France, with a portfolio of 476 hotels in ten EU Member States (Austria, Belgium, Czechia, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Slovenia and Spain), and in Switzerland and Brazil.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2019212EN.01000301-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9404 — Goldman Sachs/B&B Hotels

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2019212EN.01000301-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2019212EN.01000301-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the amended annual report of Hipso Multimedia, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended November 30, 2008 (the“Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof, I, Rene Arbic, CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Rene Arbic

Rene ArbicCEODated: October 7, 2009

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to Hipso Multimedia, Inc. and will beretained by Hipso Multimedia, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.
#### State v. Osburn

109,740

07/21/2015

Denied

Unpublished
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MAPCO INC.'S
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 1997, AND MAPCO INC.'S
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          41,700
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  298,300
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,000
<INVENTORY>                                    153,200
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               525,200
<PP&E>                                       2,210,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 810,500
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,215,900
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          459,100
<BONDS>                                        757,900
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        63,100
<OTHER-SE>                                     558,800
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,215,900
<SALES>                                      1,785,500
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,785,500
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,691,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (72,600)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,700
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                139,800
<INCOME-TAX>                                    54,100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             83,400
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    83,400
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.50
        

</TABLE>
|                                                                               
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                 
|View History:                                                                  
|                                                                               
|Alaska Natural Gas Deliveries to Electric Power Consumers  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                               
|                                                                               
|Alaska Natural Gas Deliveries to Electric Power Consumers  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                               

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 33,510 | 28,785 | 30,528
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 35,570 | 32,588 | 31,704 | 34,403 | 37,641 | 39,284 | 43,288 | 40,901 | 43,199 | 38,078
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 39,732 | 41,738 | 39,758 | 33,944 | 31,944 | 30,207 | 28,224 | 28,933 | 25,393 | 24,401
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 22,841 | 25,510 | 26,476 | 32,460 |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

LISA LEE SHILOH,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 648 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

LISA LEE SHILOH,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 649 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 21st day of April, 2021

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.