alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-2151 MELVIN ABDULLAH EL-AMIN, Individually, Plaintiff - Appellant, and ROBIN RENEE EL-AMIN, as husband and wife, Plaintiff, versus CHARLES BELL, President and Shop-s teward, Heavy and Highway Construction Laborers Local #516, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Joseph H. Young, Senior District Judge. (CA-95-1682-Y) Submitted: March 13, 1997 Decided: March 18, 1997 Before HALL, ERVIN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Melvin Abdullah El-Amin, Appellant Pro Se. John Schroeder Singleton, GENDLER & SINGLETON, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order granting Appellee Bell and the Laborers International Union of North America Local No. 516's motion to dismiss. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neithera final order, because the order failed to dismiss all the Defendants, nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We deny Appellant's motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
|                                                                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                   
|View History:                                                                                    
|                                                                                                 
|Percent of Industrial Natural Gas Deliveries in Massachusetts Represented by the Price  (Percent)
|                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                 
|Percent of Industrial Natural Gas Deliveries in Massachusetts Represented by the Price  (Percent)
|                                                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 33.8   | 26.2   | 36.9  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 27.3   | 26.3   | 20.0   | 45.4   | 38.2   | 36.5   | 34.4   | 29.9   | 20.6   | 21.1  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 19.4   | 20.6   | 17.7   | 18.3   | 22.3   | 26.6   | 25.8   | 26.4   | 26.6   | 25.9  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 24.3   | 25.2   | 28.4   | 27.2   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Marcus R. JOHNSON, Petitioner

No. 337 EAL 2017

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

November 28, 2017

*216ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 28th day of November, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 36 Engrossed in House (EH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 36

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That, in the enrollment of the bill (H.R. 1473) making appropriations 
for the Department of Defense and the other departments and agencies of 
the Government for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2011, and for 
other purposes, the Clerk of the House of Representatives shall make 
the following correction: At the

              

 end of title VIII of division B, insert the following new section:
    ``Sec. 1864.  None of the funds made available by this Act may be 
made available for any purpose to Planned Parenthood Federation of 
America, Inc. or any affiliate of Planned Parenthood Federation of 
America, Inc.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 14, 2011.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
112th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 36

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

     Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives to make a 
               correction in the enrollment of H.R. 1473.
```
Exhibit 99.1   Officer's Certificate regarding Annual Statement of
               Compliance of Washington Mutual Bank

                             WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK
                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE


The  undersigned  officer of  Washington  Mutual  Bank (the  "Servicer")  hereby
certifies  on behalf of the  Servicer  and on his own behalf for purposes of the
WaMu Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-AR15, as follows:

1. I am the duly appointed and qualified Senior Vice President of the Servicer.

2. Capitalized terms used and not defined herein shall have the meanings
ascribed to such terms in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement related to the
above-referenced series of Certificates.

3. I am duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officer's Certificate on
behalf of the Servicer.

4. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and performance under this Agreement has been made under my
supervision.

5. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed my name as of March 1, 2006.


                     WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK


                     By: /s/ Henry J. Berens
                         -------------------------------------
                         Henry J. Berens
                         Senior Vice President
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 76 (Tuesday, April 21, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 19737]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10436]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health (NIH)


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Meeting of the National 
Advisory Council on Aging

    Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given of the 
meeting of the National Advisory Council on Aging, National Institute 
on Aging, Thursday, May 21, and Friday, May 22, 1998, to be held at the 
National Institutes of Health, Building 31, Conference Room 6, 
Bethesda, Maryland. This meeting will be open to the public on 
Thursday, May 21, from 2:30 to 4:15 p.m. for a status report by the 
Director, NIA, and a Panel Discussion.
    The meeting will be open again on Friday, May 22, from 8 a.m. to 
adjournment for a report on the Working Group on Program, a report on 
the Minority Aging Task Force, a presentation on Minority Health, a 
report on the Task Force on Training and Program Highlights. Attendance 
by the public will be limited to space available.
    In accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) 
and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. and section 10(d) of Public Law 92-463, 
the meeting of the Council will be closed to the public on Thursday, 
May 21, from 4:15 p.m. to recess for the discussion and evaluation of 
grant applications. These applications and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a 
clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
    Ms. June McCann, Committee Management Officer for the National 
Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Gateway Building, 
7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 2C218, Bethesda, Maryland 20892 (301/496-
9322), will provide a summary of the meeting and a roster of committee 
members upon request.
    Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, such as 
sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should 
contact Ms. McCann at (301) 496-9322, in advance of the meeting.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health)

    Dated: April 14, 1998.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 98-10436 Filed 4-20-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
No. 12-6032.

#### Arrington *v.*Sauers, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Forest.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 28, 2017.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, June 28, 2017

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A17D0495. C&M ENTERPRISES OF GEORGIA, LLC v. MARK WILLIAMS, 

COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES et al..

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

2017CV285140
Exhibit 12.1
 Pregis Holding II Corporation
 Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
 (in thousands)
 Successor
    
    
    PredecessorOctober 13 to
    
    
    January 1 to
    
    
    Year endedYear ended December 31,
    
    
    December 31,
    
    
    October 12,
    
    
    December 31,2008
    
    
    2007
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004Earnings:Pretax income (loss) from
continuing operations
    
    $
    (49,595
    )
    
    $
    2,929
    
    
    $
    (3,558
    )
    
    $
    (4,695
    )
    
    $
    (6,953
    )
    
    $
    28,445Fixed charges
    
    
    55,593
    
    
    
    53,325
    
    
    
    48,515
    
    
    
    11,786
    
    
    
    7,114
    
    
    
    9,935Less: Capitalized interest
    
    
    (5
    )
    
    
    (237
    )
    
    
    (145
    )
    
    
    (26
    )
    
    
    (451
    )
    
    
    (61
    )Earnings
    
    $
    5,993
    
    
    $
    56,017
    
    
    $
    44,812
    
    
    $
    7,065
    
    
    $
    (290
    )
    
    $
    38,319Fixed charges:Interest expense
    
    $
    49,069
    
    
    $
    46,730
    
    
    $
    42,535
    
    
    $
    10,524
    
    
    $
    2,195
    
    
    $
    4,433Capitalized interest
    
    
    5
    
    
    
    237
    
    
    
    145
    
    
    
    26
    
    
    
    451
    
    
    
    61Interest component of
rental expense
    
    
    6,519
    
    
    
    6,358
    
    
    
    5,835
    
    
    
    1,236
    
    
    
    4,468
    
    
    
    5,441Total fixed charges
    
    $
    55,593
    
    
    $
    53,325
    
    
    $
    48,515
    
    
    $
    11,786
    
    
    $
    7,114
    
    
    $
    9,935Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    0.11
    *
    
    
    1.05
    
    
    
    0.92
    *
    
    
    0.60
    *
    
    
    (0.04)
    *
    
    
    3.86
 
 *
    
    Earnings were insufficient to cover fixed charges by $49,600 and $3,703 for the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2006, respectively, and $4,721 for the period October 13, 2005 to December
31, 2005, and $7,404 for the period January 1, 2005 to October 12, 2005.
EXHIBIT 4.3.6

Amendment No. 6
To License No. 14708 (series A 014121)
dated April 7, 2000

Legal address on the title page of the License shall read as follows:

“127083, Moscow, Ul. Vosmogo Marta, 10, bldg. 14.”

 

	 First Deputy Minister
 of the Russian Federation for
 Communications and Information
 	  
 	 [Signature]
 	  
 	 Yu.A. Pavlenko
 
	  
 	  
 	  
 	  
 	  
 
	  
 	  
 	  
 	  
 	 June 13, 2002
 


 

	 Head of the Department
 of the Organization
 of Licensing Activity
 
 
 	  
 	 [Signature]
 [Seal]
 	  
 	 B.V. Vorobiev
# United States Court of Appeals **for the Fifth Circuit**

No. 20-60922 Summary Calendar

Dikonge Dasime Itoe,

Petitioner ,

versus

Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General , Respondent

.

Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Agency No. A213 315 974

Before Davis, Jones, and Elrod, Circuit Judges

. Per Curiam: *
Dikonge Dasime Itoe, a native and ci tizen of Cameroon, petitioned for
review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing his appeal from an order of the I mmigration Judge (IJ) denying his applications for asylum, withholdin g of removal, and relief under the

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 6, 2022
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 20-60922 Document: 00516383858 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/06/2022No. 20-60922

2 Convention Against Torture. Because the BIA has si nce granted a motion to reopen and remanded the matter to th e IJ for further proceedings, the respondent has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the instant petition for review for lack of jurisdiction.
We generally have jurisdiction to re view a “final order of removal.” 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(1). An order of r emoval is final when the BIA affirms an IJ’s decision or when the time for appea ling an IJ’s decision has expired. 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(47)(B). Because th is court may review a final order of removal only if “the applicant has ex hausted all administrative remedies of right,” failure to exhaust results in a jurisdictional bar to review. Roy v. Ashcroft , 389 F.3d 132, 137 (5th Cir. 2004); § 1252(d)(1).
In this case, the BIA ha s specifically ordered th at the proceedings be reopened and has stated that, on remand , the parties will have an opportunity to update the record and the IJ will have an opportunity to further assess the merits of Dasime Itoe’s claims, includi ng any newly offered evidence. The BIA must address any claims arising from these proceedings before Dasime
Itoe can assert them before this court. See Roy , 389 F.3d at 137. Because Dasime Itoe is currently pursuing administrative remedies below, he is no longer subject to a final or der of removal that this court has jurisdiction to
review. See id. ; see also Gregoire v. Holder , 421 F. App’x 432, 433 (5th Cir. 2011) (holding that a BIA order granting reconsideration and remanding the matter to an IJ deprived th is court of jurisdiction). 1

MOTION TO DISMISS GRANTED. PETITION FOR
REVIEW DISMISSED.

1 Unpublished opinions issued on or after January 1, 1996, are not binding precedent, but they may be persuasive authority. Ballard v. Burton , 444 F.3d 391, 401 n.7 (5th Cir. 2006); 5 th Cir. R. 47.5.4. Case: 20-60922 Document: 00516383858 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/06/2022
----

| i.   | A                review of the activities of GMAC Commercial Mortgage Corporation                as Master                Servicer during the period, and of its performance under this Trust                and                Servicing Agreement, has been made under my                supervision. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| ii.   | To                the best of my knowledge, based on such review, GMAC Commercial Mortgage                Corporation as Master Servicer, has fulfilled in all material respects                its                obligations under this Pooling and Servicing Agreement throughout                the                period. |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| iii.   | GMAC                Commercial Mortgage Corporation, as Servicer, has received no notice                regarding qualifications, or challenging the status, of any REMIC                Pool as                a REMIC or the status of either Grantor Trust Pool as a Grantor Trust                or                otherwise asserting a tax on the income or assets of any portion                of the                Trust Fund from the Internal Revenue Service or any other governmental                agency or body. |
|------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

**Inv.      750 Lib A**

----
Services Agreement



 EXHIBIT 10.2 
  

	 To:        Keith Richard 
	 Date:  Feb. 21.2002 



	Cc:	 	Harry Brayne, John Fitzgerald 


	From:	 	Fred Moore 


	    	 	Horison, Inc. 

  

	Sub:	 	Horison, Inc. Services Agreement 

  
 Keith, thanks for hosting me at the BakBone offices in San Diego on Feb. 13th. I found the day extremely informative as I gained a greater understanding of the impressive suite of backup and recovery services you offer. The BakBone solutions are well positioned to address the
growing demand for backup/recovery technologies for the Unix, NT, and Linux markets. As a result of my visit and interest to continue to work with BakBone Software in a variety of roles, I am proposing the services agreement outlined below for your
review. 
  
 Regards, 
  
 Fred Moore 
  
 SERVICES AGREEMENT 
  
 I.    General Services Agreement (performed by
Horison, Inc.) 
  
 Horison, Inc. President Fred Moore will provide the
following activities as outlined below. 
  

	 	•	 	Lead the internal process and development activity of the BakBone strategic plan 

  

	 	•	 	Assist as appropriate with investment community activities including analysts, Bankers and financial institutions 

  

	 	•	 	Assist BakBone in recruiting key personnel 

  

	 	•	 	Produce a competitive positioning scenario for the backup/recovery industry highlighting strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats, product positioning and develop a
positioning statement for BakBone 

  

	 	•	 	Chair the BakBone strategic advisory board and assist in member selection where appropriate 

  

	 	•	 	Terms: 

  
 –Duration of this agreement will be from Mar. 1, 2002 to Mar. 1, 2003 
 –The fee for these services
will be $6000 per month plus travel expenses paid within 30 days of invoice to Horison, Inc. 
 –A 30 day written notice must be given by
either party regarding termination of this agreement 
  
 II.    Governance Board 
  
 Fred Moore of
Horison, Inc will also become a member of the BakBone Board of Directors for a period of one year renewable annually. The Board of Directors will meet in person or via teleconference up to six times per year. This position will include a cash fee of
$1000 per meeting plus travel expenses. In addition, BakBone will grant stock options to Fred Moore in the amount of 100,000 shares at market value at the time of acceptance of this agreement. 
 III.    Conflict of Interest 
  
 This agreement indicates that BakBone Software fully understands that Horison, Inc. President Fred Moore is an industry analyst and serves as Editor-in-chief of Computer
Technology Review magazine. In these roles, Fred 








 
Moore is free to consult with and write articles covering companies that may be in direct competition with BakBone Software. This agreement will not restrict
Fred Moore’s ability to work with any company he chooses and waives any and all conflict-of-interest requirements. 
  
 This agreement may be terminated by any either party with 30 days written notice. 
  


		
	 /s/    FRED
MOORE        

 Horison Inc. Fred Moore
	 	  

 BakBone Software

		
	 Date:     3/13/02