alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS

‐‐‐‐ooOoo‐‐‐‐

State of Utah,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

Kelly Robbennolt,

Defendant and Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

PER CURIAM DECISION

Case No. 20110436‐CA

F I L E D

(July 27, 2012)

   2012 UT App 209

‐‐‐‐‐

Fourth District, Provo Department, 091401782

The Honorable Darold J. McDade

Attorneys: Taylor C. Hartley, American Fork; and William H. Nebeker, Provo, for

Appellant

Mark L. Shurtleff and Laura B. Dupaix, Salt Lake City, for Appellee

‐‐‐‐‐

Before Judges McHugh, Thorne, and Roth.

¶1 Kelly Robbennolt appeals his conviction of forgery after a bench trial.  We affirm.

¶2 “When reviewing a bench trial for sufficiency of evidence, we must sustain the

trial court’s judgment unless it is against the clear weight of the evidence, or if the

appellate court otherwise reaches a definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been

made.”  State v. Larsen, 2000 UT App 106, ¶ 10, 999 P.2d 1252 (internal quotation marks

omitted).  When challenging the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, a

defendant “must marshal all of the evidence in support of the trial court’s findings of

fact and then demonstrate that the evidence, including all reasonable inferences drawn

therefrom, is insufficient to support the findings.”  Id. ¶ 11 (citation omitted).  To meet

the marshaling burden, Robbennolt was required to “present, in comprehensive and
1

Robbennolt also asserts that the trial court’s comment in finding him guilty

precluded finding the element of intent.  However, the trial court clearly found that

Robbennolt had the intent to defraud and the comment singled out by Robbennolt is

out of context.

20110436‐CA 2

fastidious order,” all of the evidence presented at trial supporting the findings he now

resists.  State v. Clark, 2005 UT 75, ¶ 17, 124 P.3d 235.

¶3 Robbennolt fails to meet this burden.  Instead, he merely presents some evidence

favorable to him that he argues conclusively establishes that he had authority to give a

partial deed of trust to the victim.  This does not constitute marshaling.  See id.  Further,

in finding Robbennolt guilty of forgery, the trial court necessarily relied on the direct

witness testimony and did not give weight to the evidence as Robbennolt presents it.

Testimony established that Robbennolt’s authority to issue partial deeds of trust was

limited to a specific need to correct errors for particular investors.  He did not have

authority to grant additional interests in the subject property or encumber it further.

The evidence supports the trial court’s conclusion that Robbennolt lacked the authority

to grant the partial deed of trust and that he acted with the purpose to defraud.

Accordingly, his challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence fails.1

¶4 Affirmed.

____________________________________

Carolyn B. McHugh,

Presiding Judge

____________________________________

William A. Thorne Jr., Judge

____________________________________

Stephen L. Roth, Judge
|                                                                        
|------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                          
|View History:                                                           
|                                                                        
|Kentucky Natural Gas Industrial Price  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                        
|                                                                        
|Kentucky Natural Gas Industrial Price  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 4.19   | 4.00   | 3.32  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 4.82   | 6.51   | 4.63   | 6.54   | 7.38   | 9.90   | 9.64   | 8.37   | 10.41  | 6.04  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 5.57   | 5.16   | 3.96   | 4.84   | 5.78   | 4.37   | 3.84   | 4.46   | 4.40   | 4.06  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 3.50   | 5.04   | 7.84   | 4.27   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
# C_2019394EN.01000801.xml

| 21.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 394/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.11.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 394/8

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9598 — Allianz/T&R)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 394/04)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Allianz Capital Partners GmbH (‘ACP’, Germany), belonging to the group Allianz SE (Germany), |
| --- | --- |

—

Allianz Capital Partners GmbH (‘ACP’, Germany), belonging to the group Allianz SE (Germany),

| — | Autobahn Tank & Rast Gruppe GmbH & Co KG (‘T&R’, Germany). |
| --- | --- |

—

Autobahn Tank & Rast Gruppe GmbH & Co KG (‘T&R’, Germany).

Allianz SE acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of T&R. The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | ACP is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Allianz SE, the ultimate parent company of the Allianz Group. The Allianz Group offers a comprehensive range of insurance and asset management products and services to both private and corporate customers in more than 70 countries, |
| --- | --- |

—

ACP is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Allianz SE, the ultimate parent company of the Allianz Group. The Allianz Group offers a comprehensive range of insurance and asset management products and services to both private and corporate customers in more than 70 countries,

| — | T&R is a provider of food services, retail goods, hotel accommodation and fuel on German motorways. |
| --- | --- |

—

T&R is a provider of food services, retail goods, hotel accommodation and fuel on German motorways.

3.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9598 — Allianz/T&R

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

| Postal address: |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Postal address:

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---
|                                                                       
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                         
|View History:                                                          
|                                                                       
|New York Natural Gas Underground Storage Capacity  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                       
|                                                                       
|New York Natural Gas Underground Storage Capacity  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |         |         | 156,259 | 156,259
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 147,618 | 150,538 | 167,834 | 173,463 | 173,463 | 173,463 | 173,979 | 175,479 | 175,479 | 175,129
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 175,495 | 166,000 | 190,156 | 200,545 | 204,765 | 204,855 | 213,225 | 229,013 | 228,613 | 245,579
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 245,579 | 245,579 | 245,579 | 245,779 | 245,779 | 245,779 | 245,779 | 245,779 | 245,779 | 245,779
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 245,779 | 245,779 | 242,791 |         |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-1478

ASHUKEM TARH NKWANYUO,

Petitioner,

versus

JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General of the United

States,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A77-892-913)

Submitted: March 31, 2004 Decided: April 14, 2004

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bokwe G. Mofor, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner. Peter D.

Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Margaret J. Perry, Senior

Litigation Counsel, Deborah N. Misir, Office of Immigration

Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.,

for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Ashukem Tarh Nkwanyuo, a native and citizen of Cameroon,

petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reopen and reconsider. 

On April 12, 2002, the Board entered an order affirming

the immigration judge’s order denying asylum and other forms of

relief. Nkwanyuo did not file a petition for review from that

order. He did file a motion to reopen and reconsider with the

Board. The Board denied the motion to reconsider because it was

untimely. It denied the motion to reopen because the proffered

evidence did not alter the finding that Nkwanyuo failed to present

a credible claim for asylum. 

To the extent Nkwanyuo challenges the April 12 order, we

are without jurisdiction to review it because he did not file a

timely petition for review from that order. See 8 U.S.C.

§ 1252(b)(1) (2000); Stone v. INS, 514 U.S. 386, 405 (1995). The

filing of a motion to reopen or reconsider with the Board does not

toll the thirty-day period for seeking review of the underlying

order. Id. at 394. 

The Board’s denial of the motion to reconsider is not a

question before us. We review the denial of a motion to reopen for

abuse of discretion. 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2003); INS v. Doherty,

502 U.S. 314, 323-24 (1992). “A motion to reopen proceedings shall

not be granted unless it appears to the Board that evidence sought
- 3 -

to be offered is material and was not available and could not have

been discovered or presented at the former hearing . . . .” 8

C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(l) (2003). 

We find the Board did not abuse its discretion denying

the motion to reopen. Accordingly, we deny the petition for

review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
|                                                                        
|------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                          
|View History:                                                           
|                                                                        
|Natural Gas Citygate Price in Montana  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                        
|                                                                        
|Natural Gas Citygate Price in Montana  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        | 4.21   | 4.14   | 3.94   | 3.85   | 3.69   | 3.43  
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 3.30   | 3.69   | 3.45   | 3.29   | 3.49   | 3.01   | 3.03   | 3.16   | 2.43   | 2.57  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 3.55   | 3.93   | 2.98   | 5.04   | 6.47   | 7.62   | 7.25   | 6.42   | 7.71   | 5.63  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 5.17   | 5.11   | 4.23   | 4.21   | 5.03   | 3.71   | 3.05   | 3.28   | 3.02   | 2.66  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2.92   | 4.92   | 5.87   | 4.34   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
Exhibit 99.1
                                 ------------

                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWALT, INC.
                       ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2005-67CB
             MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-67CB


      The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(a "Master Servicer"), and do hereby further certify pursuant to Section 3.16
of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the
Agreement has been made under our supervision; and

(ii) To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                                      Dated: March 28, 2006
----------------

CRAIG BAINGO
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT



/s/ Kevin Meyers                                      Dated: March 28, 2006
----------------

KEVIN MEYERS
MANAGING DIRECTOR, CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER, LOAN ADMINISTRATION
|                                                                                            
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                              
|View History:                                                                               
|                                                                                            
|Natural Gas Delivered to Consumers in Montana (Including Vehicle Fuel)  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                            
|                                                                                            
|Natural Gas Delivered to Consumers in Montana (Including Vehicle Fuel)  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 54,138 | 54,093 | 55,129
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 57,725 | 54,529 | 58,451 | 56,074 | 54,066 | 55,200 | 60,602 | 60,869 | 64,240 | 66,613
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 60,517 | 68,113 | 61,963 | 68,410 | 70,675 | 66,892 | 67,011 | 72,935 | 79,300 | 80,906
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 75,386 | 76,314 | 83,090 | 84,627 |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
<Page>
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.1

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    In connection with the Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2002, of
ABB Ltd (the "Company") as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jurgen Dormann, Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

    (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
       15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

    (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
       Company.

<Table>
<S>                                            <C>
                                               /s/ Jurgen Dormann
                                               --------------------------------------------
                                               Jurgen Dormann
                                               Chief Executive Officer
                                               June 30, 2003
</Table>

    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to ABB and will be retained by ABB and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 73 (Thursday, April 16, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 18963]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10185]



[[Page 18963]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

STATE JUSTICE INSTITUTE


Sunshine Act Meeting

DATE AND TIME: Friday, May 1, 1998, 9:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.; Saturday, May 
2, 1998, 9:00 a.m.-12:00 p.m.

PLACE: Radisson Resort, 500 Padre Boulevard, South Padre Island, Texas 
78597.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: FY 1998 grant requests, internal Institute 
business matters.

PORTIONS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC:  All matters other than those noted as 
closed below.

PORTIONS CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC: Internal personnel matters and Board of 
Directors' committee meetings.

CONTACT PERSON FOR FURTHER INFORMATION:
David I. Tevelin, Executive Director, State Justice Institute, 1650 
King Street, Suite 600, Alexandria, VA 22314, (703) 684-6100.
David I. Tevelin,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 98-10185 Filed 4-13-98; 4:07 pm]
BILLING CODE 6820-SC-M