### 8219 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 24 / Tuesday, February 5, 2013 / Notices

(19) Mario Salinas-Lucio; January 9, 2012; U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas; Case No. 1:09CR00824–001; January 1968.

(20) Leoncio Sanchez; June 22, 2012; U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas; Case No. 1:11CR01100–002; August 1989.

(21) Andro Telemi; November 30, 2012; U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois; Case No. 09 CR 736– 2; June 1970.

(22) Guillermo Enrique Villarreal; June 22, 2012; U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas; Case No. 1:11CR01100–001; October 1974.

As noted above, at the end of the three-year period following the date of this notice, the above named persons/ entities remain debarred unless export privileges are reinstated.

Debarred persons are generally ineligible to participate in activity regulated under the ITAR (see e.g., sections 120.1(c) and (d), and 127.11(a)). Also, under Section 127.1(d) of the ITAR, any person who has knowledge that another person is subject to debarment or is otherwise ineligible may not, without disclosure to and written approval from the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls, participate,directly or indirectly, in any ITARcontrolled export in which such ineligible person may benefit there from or have a direct or indirect interest therein.

Further, Federal Register document 2012–18043, published at 77 FR 43414, Tuesday, July 24, 2012, is corrected on page 43415, by deletion in its entirety of lines 66 through 70, inclusive. That notice of statutory debarment incorrectly included as a debarred party the following record:

‘‘(33) Balraj Naidu; December 20, 2010; U.S. District Court, District of Maryland, Case No. CCB–1–08–CR–0091–002; February,
1967.’’

Mr. Naidu was indicted under seal in February, 2008, for, inter alia, conspiracy to violate, and violation of, the AECA. The judgment filed by the court and dated December 20, 2010 and relied on for purposes of statutory debarment stated as the nature of the offense for which judgment was entered ‘‘Conspiracy to Violate the Arms Export Control Act’’ and cited to U.S. Code Title and Sections ‘‘18:371 & 22:2778.’’ Subsequently, the court filed an amended judgment dated May 16, 2012, to correctly identify as the nature of the offense for which judgment was entered ‘‘Conspiracy to Provide Material Support to a Foreign Terrorist Organization’’ and cited to U.S. Code Title and Sections ‘‘18 USC 2339B(a)(1); 18 USC 2339A(b)(1).’’ As Mr. Naidu was not, in fact, convicted of violating, or conspiracy to violate, the AECA, the provisions of Section 127.7(c) of the ITAR are not applicable.

This notice is provided for purposes of making the public aware that the persons listed above are prohibited from participating directly or indirectly in activities regulated by the ITAR, including any brokering activities and in any export from or temporary import into the United States of defense articles, related technical data, or defense services in all situations covered by the ITAR. Specific case information may be obtained from the Office of the Clerk for the U.S. District Courts mentioned above and by citing the court case number where provided.

Dated: January 16, 2013. Andrew J. Shapiro,Assistant Secretary, Bureau of PoliticalMilitary Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2013–02491 Filed 2–4–13; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4710–25–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION**

**Office of the Secretary**

**Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity and**  **Foreign Air Carrier Permits**

Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart B (formerly Subpart Q) during the Week Ending January 12, 2013. The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart B (formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation’s Procedural Regulations (See 14 CFR 301.201 et
seq. ). The due date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below for each application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate cases a final order without further proceedings.

Docket Number: DOT–OST–2013–

0006.

Date Filed: January 7, 2013. Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify Scope: January 28, 2013.

Description: Application of Sirio S.p.A. requesting a foreign air carrier permit and exemption authority to engage in the following operations using small aircraft: (a) Foreign charter air transportation of persons, property, and mail from any point or points behind any Member State of the European Community via any point or points in any Member State and via intermediate points to any point or points in the United States and beyond; (b) foreign charter air transportation of persons, property, and mail between any point or points in the United States and any point or points in any Member State of the European Common Aviation Area; (c) foreign charter cargo air transportation between any point and points in the United States and any other point or points; and (d) charter transportation consistent with any future, additional rights that may be granted to foreign air carriers of the Member States of the European Community.

Docket Number: DOT–OST–2009–

0010.

Date Filed: January 8, 2013. Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify Scope: January 29, 2013.

Description: Application of 1263343 Alberta Inc. d/b/a enerjet (‘‘enerjet’’) requesting that the Department amend its foreign air carrier permit to enable it to engage in scheduled air transportation of persons, property, and mail between Canada and the United States as more specifically: enerjet seeks authority to (i) conduct scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property, and mail from points behind Canada, via Canada and intermediate points, to a point or points in the United States and beyond, co-extensive with that provided for in Annex 1, Section 1.B of the Open Skies Agreement (the ‘‘Air Transport Agreement’’) between Canada and the United States signed on March 12, 2007 and (ii) scheduled and charter foreign air transportation of cargo between any point or points in the United States and any other point or points; in addition to maintaining its existing authority.

Docket Number: DOT–OST–2008– 0105 and DOT–OST–2011–0076.

Date Filed: January 10, 2013. Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify Scope: January 31, 2013.

Description: Application of Federal Express Corporation (‘‘FedEx Express’’) requesting renewal of its certificate of public convenience and necessity for Route 568, authorizing FedEx Express to engage in scheduled foreign all-cargo air transportation between a point or points


### 8220 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 24 / Tuesday, February 5, 2013 / Notices

in the United States, and certain named points in Mexico.

Barbara J. Hairston, Acting Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.

[FR Doc. 2013–02452 Filed 2–4–13; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–9X–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION**

**Federal Aviation Administration**

**Notice of Release From Quitclaim Deed and Federal Grant Assurance**  **Obligations for Delano Municipal Airport, Delano, CA** 

**AGENCY :**  Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

**ACTION :**  Notice of Request to Release Airport Land.

**SUMMARY :**  The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) proposes to rule and invites public comment on the application for a release of approximately 9.89 acres of airport property at Delano Municipal Airport, Delano, California from all conditions contained in the Quitclaim Deed and Grant Assurances since the parcels of land are not needed for airport purposes. The property will be conveyed at its fair market value for the benefit of the airport. The use of the land by the City of Delano will remain the same and represents a continued compatible land use that will not interfere with the airport or its operation, thereby protecting the interests of civil aviation.

**DATES :**  Comments must be received on or before March 7, 2013.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Comments on the request may be mailed or delivered to the FAA at the following address: Tony Garcia, Airports Compliance Program Manager, Federal Aviation Administration, Airports Division, Federal Register Comment, 15000 Aviation Boulevard, Lawndale, CA 90261. In addition, one copy of the comment submitted to the FAA must be mailed or delivered to Mr. Roman Dowling, Public Works Director, City of Delano, 1015 Eleventh Avenue, P.O. Box 3010, Delano, California 93216–

3010.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  In accordance with the Wendell H. Ford Aviation Investment and Reform Act for the 21st Century (AIR 21), Public Law 10–181 (Apr. 5, 2000; 114 Stat. 61), this notice must be published in the Federal Register 30 days before the Secretary may waive any condition imposed on a federally obligated airport by surplus property conveyance deeds or grant agreements.

The following is a brief overview of the request:

The City of Delano, California requested a release from the conditions contained in the Quitclaim Deed and Grant Assurance obligations for approximately 9.89 acres of airport land. The property is located on the west and north sides of the airport in the vicinity of Lexington Street. A City public works facility occupies 7.8 acres, while 2.09 acres serve as part of the city golf course. The land has not served an airport purpose and will not be needed for future airport purposes. The land will be conveyed to the City for its fair market value. The property will continue to be used for the same purpose, so it will remain a compatible use that will not interfere with airport operations. The conveyance will not prevent development of the airport, thereby serving the interests of civil
aviation.

Issued in Hawthorne, California, on January 29, 2013. Brian Armstrong, Manager, Safety and Standards, Airports Division, Western-Pacific Region.

[FR Doc. 2013–02475 Filed 2–4–13; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–13–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY**

**Fiscal Service**

**Surety Companies Acceptable on Federal Bonds—Change In Business**  **Address and Redomestication: American Fire and Casualty Company**  **(NAIC #24066) and The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company (NA1C #24074)** 

**AGENCY :**  Financial Management Service, Fiscal Service, Department of the Treasury.

**ACTION :**  Notice.

**SUMMARY :**  This is Supplement No. 4 to the Treasury Department Circular 570, 2012 Revision, published July 2, 2012,
at 77 FR 39322.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Surety Bond Branch at (202) 874–6850.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  Notice is hereby given by the Treasury that the above-named companies formally changed their ‘‘BUSINESS ADDRESS’’ to ‘‘62 Maple Avenue, Keene, NH 03431’’ effective immediately. In addition, the above-named companies have redomesticated from the state of Ohio to the state of New Hampshireeffective October 1, 2012. Federal bondapproving officers should annotate their reference copies of the Treasury Circular 570 (‘‘Circular’’), 2012 Revision, to reflect these changes.

The Circular may be viewed and downloaded through the Internet at http://www.fms.treas.gov/c570

.

Questions concerning this Notice may be directed to the U.S. Department of the Treasury, Financial Management Service, Financial Accounting and Services Division, Surety Bond Branch, 3700 East-West Highway, Room 6F01, Hyattsville, MD 20782.

Dated: January 14, 2013. Kevin McIntyre, Acting Director, Financial Accounting and Services Division, Financial Management
Service.

[FR Doc. 2013–02294 Filed 2–4–13; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4810–35–M**

**DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY**

**Office of Foreign Assets Control**

**Actions Taken Pursuant to Executive Order 13382** 

**ACTION :**  Notice.

**SUMMARY :**  The Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (‘‘OFAC’’) is announcing an update to the entry of an entity on OFAC’s SDN List by adding an alias to the entity’s entry. The addition of the alias by the Director of OFAC, pursuant to Executive Order 13382, is effective on January 24,

2013.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Assistant Director, Compliance Outreach & Implementation, Office of Foreign Assets Control, Department of the Treasury, Washington, DC 20220, Tel.: 202/622–2490.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  Electronic and Facsimile Availability

This document and additional information concerning OFAC are available from OFAC’s Web site ( www.treasury.gov/ofac) or via facsimile through a 24-hour fax-on-demand service, Tel.: 202/622–0077.
Background

On June 28, 2005, the President, invoking the authority, inter alia, of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–1706) (‘‘IEEPA’’), issued Executive Order 13382 (70 FR 38567, July 1, 2005) (the ‘‘Order’’), effective at 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time on June 29, 2005. In the Order, the President took additional steps with respect to the national emergency described and declared in Executive Order 12938 of November 14,