### 52484 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 165 / Thursday, August 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules

installed in the correct positions and the threads of the anchor nuts are in good condition. The replacement of the attachment hardware is required if any damage on the anchor nut threads or a bolt at the wrong location is found.
Actions and Compliance

(f) Unless already done, do the following actions:

(1) Within 1 month after the effective date of this AD, check the airplane maintenance records to determine if the left and/or right aileron outboard bearing supports have been removed at any time during the life of the airplane. Do this check following paragraph 3.A. of Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. PC–7 Service Bulletin No. 57–015, Rev. No. 1, date July 23,
2010.

(2) If an entry is found during the airplane maintenance records check required in paragraph (f)(1) of this AD or it is unclear whether or not the left and/or right aileron outboard bearing supports have been removed, perform the actions following the instructions in paragraph 3.A.(2) through paragraph 3.E of Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. PC–7 Service Bulletin No. 57–015, Rev. No. 1, date July 23, 2010.

FAA AD Differences

Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/ or service information as follows: No differences.

Other FAA AD Provisions

(g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, Standards Office, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to Attn: Doug Rudolph, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329–4059; fax: (816) 329– 4090. Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.

(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority (or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product is airworthy before it is returned to service.

(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information collection requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120–0056. Special Flight Permit

(h) Special flight permits will not be issued. Related Information (i) Refer to MCAI Federal Office of Civil Aviation (FOCA) AD HB–2010–010, dated July 29, 2010; and Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. PC– 7 Service Bulletin No. 57–015, Rev. No. 1, date July 23, 2010, for related information.

Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on August 19, 2010. John Colomy, Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–21182 Filed 8–25–10; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–13–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION**

**Federal Aviation Administration**

**14 CFR Part 71**
**[Docket No. FAA–2010–0815; Airspace Docket No. 10–ANE–107]** 

**Proposed Removal and Amendment of Class E Airspace, Oxford, CT** 

**AGENCY :**  Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

**ACTION :**  Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

**SUMMARY :**  This action proposes to remove Class E surface airspace as an extension to Class D airspace, and amend Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet at Oxford, CT. Decommissioning of the Waterbury Non-Directional Beacon (NDB) at the Waterbury-Oxford airport has made this action necessary for the safety and management of Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) operations at the airport.

**DATES :**  Comments must be received on or before October 12, 2010.

**ADDRESSES :**  Send comments on this rule to: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey, SE., Washington, DC 20590–0001; Telephone: 1–800–647– 5527; Fax: 202–493–2251. You must identify the Docket Number FAA–2010– 0815; Airspace Docket No. 10–ANE– 107, at the beginning of your comments. You may also submit and review received comments through the Internet
at http://www.regulations.gov.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Melinda Giddens, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, P.O. Box 20636, Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone (404) 305–5610.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 
Comments Invited

Interested persons are invited to comment on this rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments, as they may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic, environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.

Communications should identify both docket numbers (FAA Docket No. FAA– 2010–0815; Airspace Docket No. 10–ANE–107) and be submitted in triplicate to the Docket Management System ( see **ADDRESSES** section for address and phone number). You may also submit comments through the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov.

Comments wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments on this action must submit with those comments a self-addressed stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ‘‘ Comments to Docket No. FAA–2010–0815; Airspace Docket No. 10–ANE–107. ’’ The postcard will be date/time stamped and returned to the commenter.

All communications received before the specified closing date for comments will be considered before taking action on the proposed rule. The proposal contained in this notice may be changed in light of the comments received. A report summarizing each substantive public contact with FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed in the docket. Availability of NPRMs

An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded from and comments submitted through http:// www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking documents can also be accessed through the FAA’s web page at http://www.faa.gov/ airports

_airtraffic/air

_ traffic/ publications/airspace

_amendments/.

You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any comments received, and any final disposition in person in the Dockets Office ( see the
**ADDRESSES** section for address and phone number) between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal Holidays. An informal docket may also be examined during normal business hours at the office of the Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, Room 210, 1701 Columbia Avenue, College Park, Georgia
30337.

Persons interested in being placed on a mailing list for future NPRM’s should contact the FAA’s Office of Rulemaking,


### 52485 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 165 / Thursday, August 26, 2010 / Proposed Rules

(202) 267–9677, to request a copy of Advisory circular No. 11–2A, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking distribution System, which describes the application procedure. The Proposal

The FAA is considering an amendment to Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 to remove Class E surface airspace as an extension to Class D airspace and amend the description of the Class E airspace extending upward 700 feet above the surface at Oxford-Waterbury Airport, Oxford, CT. The Waterbury NDB has been decommissioned and reference to the navigation aid would be removed from the airspace description for the safety and management of IFR operations at Waterbury-Oxford Airport.

The Class E surface airspace designations as an extension to Class D and the Class E 700 foot airspace designations are published in Paragraph 6004 and 6005, respectively, of FAA order 7400.9T, signed August 27, 2009, and effective September 15, 2009, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E airspace designations listed in this document will be published subsequently in the Order.

The FAA has determined that this proposed regulation only involves an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current. It, therefore, (1) Is not a ‘‘ significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘ significant rule ’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter that will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is certified that this proposed rule, when promulgated, would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

The FAA’s authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, section 106 describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency’s authority. This proposed rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in subtitle VII, part, A, subpart I, section 40103. Under that section, the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient use of airspace. This proposed regulation is within the scope of that authority as it would amend controlled airspace at Waterbury-Oxford Airport, Oxford, CT. Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (Air). The Proposed Amendment

In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

**PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND CLASS E AIRSPACE**  **AREAS; AIR TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS** 

1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959– 1963 Comp., p. 389.

**§ 71.1 [Amended]**

2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation Administration Order 7400.9T, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, signed August 27, 2009, effective September 15, 2009, is amended as follows:
Paragraph 6004 Class E Airspace Areas Designated as an Extension to a Class D Surface Area
* * * * *

ANE CT E4 Oxford, CT [REMOVED]
* * * * *
Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward From 700 Feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth
* * * * *

ANE CT E5 Oxford, CT [AMENDED] Waterbury-Oxford Airport, CT

(Lat. 41 ° 28 ′43 ′′ N., long. 73 ° 08 ′ 07 ′′ W.) That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface within an 8-mile radius of the Waterbury-Oxford Airport.

Issued in College Park, Georgia, on August 12, 2010. Myron A. Jenkins, Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Air Traffic Organization.
[FR Doc. 2010–21219 Filed 8–25–10; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–13–P DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY** 

**Internal Revenue Service**

**26 CFR Parts 1, 31, 40, and 301**

**[REG–153340–09]**

**RIN 1545–BJ13**

**Electronic Funds Transfer of Depository Taxes; Correction** 

**AGENCY :**  Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

**ACTION :**  Correction to notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of public hearing.

**SUMMARY :**  This document contains corrections to a notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of public hearing (REG–153340–09) that were published in the Federal Register on Monday, August 23, 2010, relating to Federal tax deposits (FTDs) by Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT).

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Michael E. Hara, (202) 622–4910 (not a toll-free number).

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  Background

The correction notice that is the subject of this document is under sections 1461, 6302, 6656, and 7502 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Need for Correction

As published, the notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of public hearing (REG–153340–09), published on Monday, August 23, 2010 (75 FR 51707), contain errors that may prove to be misleading and are in need of clarification.

Correction of Publication

Accordingly, the publication of the notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of public hearing (REG–153340– 09), which was the subject of FR Doc. 2010–20737, is corrected as follows:

1. On page 51707, column 2, in the preamble, under the caption **DATES :**  , fifth line, the language ‘‘ September 21, 2010, must be received’’ is corrected to read ‘‘ September 27, 2010, must be received’’

.

2. On page 51708, column 2, in the preamble, under the paragraph heading

‘‘ Comments and Public Hearing’’ , last paragraph of the column, second line, the language ‘‘ for September 21, 2010, at