Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 77 /Wednesday, April 22, 1998 / Notices 19897

subject to the Regulations where the

only items involved that are subject to

the Regulations are the foreignproducted direct product of U.S.-origin

technology.

V. This Order is effective immediately

and shall remain in effect until January

14, 2008.

VI. A copy of this Order shall be

delivered to Ray. This Order shall be

published in the Federal Register.

Dated: April 6, 1998

Eileen M. Albanese,

Director, Office of Exporter Services.

[FR Doc. 98–10694 Filed 4–21–98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DT–M

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 973]

Grant of Authority for Subzone Status,

Hewlett-Packard Company (Computer

and Related Electronic Products),

Miami, Florida

Pursuant to its authority under the

Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 18,

1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u),

the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the

Board) adopts the following Order:

Whereas, by an Act of Congress

approved June 18, 1934, an Act ‘‘To

provide for the establishment . . . of

foreign-trade zones in ports of entry of

the United States, to expedite and

encourage foreign commerce, and for

other purposes,’’ as amended (19 U.S.C.

81a–81u) (the Act), the Foreign-Trade

Zones Board (the Board) is authorized to

grant to qualified corporations the

privilege of establishing foreign-trade

zones in or adjacent to U.S. Customs

ports of entry;

Whereas, the Board’s regulations (15

CFR Part 400) provide for the

establishment of special-purpose

subzones when existing zone facilities

cannot serve the specific use involved;

Whereas, an application from the

Greater Miami Foreign-Trade Zone, Inc.,

grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 32, for

authority to establish special-purpose

subzone status at the computer and

electronic products manufacturing

facility of the Hewlett-Packard

Company, located at sites in Miami,

Florida, was filed by the Board on

September 17, 1997, and notice inviting

public comment was given in the

Federal Register (FTZ Docket 72–97, 62

FR 50556, 9/26/97); and,

Whereas, the Board adopts the

findings and recommendations of the

examiner’s report, and finds that the

requirements of the FTZ Act and the

Board’s regulations are satisfied, and

that approval of the application, as

amended, is in the public interest;

Now, therefore, the Board hereby

grants authority for subzone status at the

computer and related electronic

products manufacturing facilities of the

Hewlett-Packard Company, located in

Miami, Florida (Subzone 32A), at the

locations described in the application,

and subject to the FTZ Act and the

Board’s regulations, including § 400.28.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 15th day of

April 1998.

Robert S. LaRussa,

Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import

Administration, Alternate Chairman, ForeignTrade Zones Board.

Dennis Puccinelli,

Acting Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 98–10735 Filed 4–21–98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 972]

Grant of Authority for Subzone Status,

Hewlett-Packard Company (Computer

and Related Electronic Products),

Richmond, Virginia, Area

Pursuant to its authority under the

Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 18,

1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u),

the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the

Board) adopts the following Order:

Whereas, by an Act of Congress

approved June 18, 1934, an Act ‘‘To

provide for the establishment * * * of

foreign-trade zones in ports of entry of

the United States, to expedite and

encourage foreign commerce, and for

other purposes,’’ as amended (19 U.S.C.

81a–81u) (the Act), the Foreign-Trade

Zones Board (the Board) is authorized to

grant to qualified corporations the

privilege of establishing foreign-trade

zones in or adjacent to U.S. Customs

ports of entry;

Whereas, the Board’s regulations (15

CFR Part 400) provide for the

establishment of special-purpose

subzones when existing zone facilities

cannot serve the specific use involved;

Whereas, an application from the

Capital Region Airport Commission,

grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 207, for

authority to establish special-purpose

subzone status at the computer and

electronic products manufacturing

facility of the Hewlett-Packard

Company, located at sites in the

Richmond, Virginia, area, was filed by

the Board on June 19, 1997, and notice

inviting public comment was given in

the Federal Register (FTZ Docket 51–97,

62 FR 35152, 6/30/97; amended 8/25/

97); and,

Whereas, the Board adopts the

findings and recommendations of the

examiner’s report, and finds that the

requirements of the FTZ Act and the

Board’s regulations are satisfied, and

that approval of the application, as

amended, is in the public interest;

Now, therefore, the Board hereby

grants authority for subzone status at the

computer and related electronic

products manufacturing facilities of the

Hewlett-Packard Company, located in

the Richmond, Virginia, area (Subzone

207B), at the locations described in the

application, and subject to the FTZ Act

and the Board’s regulations, including

§ 400.28.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 15th day of

April 1998.

Robert S. LaRussa,

Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import

Administration, Alternate Chairman, ForeignTrade Zones Board.

Dennis Puccinelli,

Acting Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 98–10736 Filed 4–21–98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A–580–810]

Certain Stainless Steel Pipe From

Korea: Termination of Antidumping

Duty Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of termination of

antidumping duty administrative

review.

SUMMARY: In response to a request from

respondents, the Department of

Commerce (the Department) published

in the Federal Register (63 FR 10002,

February 27, 1998) the notice of

initiation of the administrative review of

the antidumping duty order on certain

welded stainless steel pipe from Korea,

for the period December 1, 1996 through

November 30, 1997. On April 3, 1998,

we received a request to withdraw the

request for this review from

respondents, SeAH Steel Corporation,

Ltd., (SeAH). Because this request was

timely submitted and because no other

interested party requested a review, we

are terminating this review.

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 22, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Lesley Stagliano or Maureen Flannery,
19898 Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 77 /Wednesday, April 22, 1998 / Notices

AD/CVD Enforcement, International

Trade Administration, U.S. Department

of Commerce, 14th Street and

Constitution Avenue, N.W.,

Washington, D.C. 20230; telephone:

(202) 482–0468, (202) 482–3020.

Applicable Statute and Regulations:

Unless otherwise indicated, all citations

to the statute are references to the

provisions effective January 1, 1995, the

effective date of the amendments made

by the Uruguay Round Agreements Act

(URAA). In addition, unless otherwise

indicated, all references to the

Department’s regulations are to the

Department’s regulations set forth at 19

CFR Part 351 (May 19, 1997).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

On December 30, 1997, respondents,

SeAH Steel Corporation (SeAH),

requested an administrative review of

certain welded stainless steel pipe from

Korea for the period December 1, 1996

through November 30, 1997 pursuant to

19 CFR 351.213(b). On February 27,

1998, in accordance with 19 CFR

351.221(b), we initiated an

administrative review of this order. On

April 3, 1998, we received a timely

withdrawal of request for review from

respondents.

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d) of the

Department’s regulations, the

Department may allow a party that

requests an administrative review to

withdraw such request not later than 90

days after the date of publication of the

notice of initiation of the administrative

review.

Because respondent’s request for

termination was submitted within the

90-day time limit and there were no

requests for review from other interested

parties, we are terminating this review.

This termination of administrative

review and notice are in accordance

with section 751(a)(1) of the Act 19 CFR

351.213(d).

Dated: March 16, 1998.

Joseph A. Spetrini,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for AD/CVD

Enforcement III.

[FR Doc. 98–10734 Filed 4–21–98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A–583–827]

Notice of Amended Antidumping Duty

Order of Sales at Less Than Fair Value:

Static Random Access Memory

Semiconductors From Taiwan

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 22, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Shawn Thompson or David Genovese,

Import Administration, International

Trade Administration, U.S. Department

of Commerce, 14th Street and

Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington,

D.C. 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1776

or (202) 482–0498, respectively.

The Applicable Statute

Unless otherwise indicated, all

citations to the Tariff Act of 1930, as

amended (the Act), are references to the

provisions effective January 1, 1995, the

effective date of the amendments made

to the Act by the Uruguay Round

Agreements Act (URAA). In addition,

unless otherwise indicated, all citations

to the Department of Commerce’s (the

Department’s) regulations are to the

regulations codified at 19 CFR Part 353

(April 1, 1996).

Scope of Order

The products covered by this order

are synchronous, asynchronous, and

specialty static random access memory

semiconductors (SRAMs) from Taiwan,

whether assembled or unassembled.

Assembled SRAMs include all package

types. Unassembled SRAMs include

processed wafers or die, uncut die and

cut die. Processed wafers produced in

Taiwan, but packaged, or assembled

into memory modules, in a third

country, are included in the scope;

processed wafers produced in a third

country and assembled or packaged in

Taiwan are not included in the scope.

The scope of this order includes

modules containing SRAMs. Such

modules include single in-line

processing modules (SIPs), single in-line

memory modules (SIMMs), dual in-line

memory modules (DIMMs), memory

cards, or other collections of SRAMs,

whether unmounted or mounted on a

circuit board.

The scope of this order does not

include SRAMs that are physically

integrated with other components of a

motherboard in such a manner as to

constitute one inseparable amalgam

(i.e., SRAMs soldered onto

motherboards).

The SRAMs within the scope of this

order are currently classifiable under

the subheadings 8542.13.8037 through

8542.13.8049, 8473.30.10 through

8473.30.90, and 8542.13.8005 of the

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the

United States (HTSUS). Although the

HTSUS subheadings are provided for

convenience and customs purposes, the

written description of the scope of this

order is dispositive.

Amended Antidumping Duty Order

On April 9, 1998, the International

Trade Commission (ITC) notified the

Department of its final determination,

pursuant to section 735(b)(1)(A)(i) of the

Act, that an industry in the United

States is materially injured by reason of

imports of static random access memory

semiconductors (SRAMs) from Taiwan.

On April 16, 1998, in accordance with

section 736(a)(1) of the Act, the

Department published the antidumping

duty order on SRAMs from Taiwan.

However, the antidumping duty order

published on April 16, 1998, only

included the weighted-average dumping

margins for the four companies for

which the Department calculated a

margin based on company-specific data

(i.e., Alliance Semiconductor

Corporation, Integrated Silicon

Solutions (Taiwan), Inc., United

Microelectronics Corporation, and

Winbond Electronics Corporation); it

did not include the weighted-average

dumping margins for the three

companies for which the Department

relied on the facts otherwise available to

calculate a margin (i.e., Advance

Microelectronics Products Inc., Best

Integrated Technology, Inc., and Texas

Instruments-Acer Incorporated, all of

which either did not respond to the

Department’s questionnaire or only

provided a partial response). This

amended order is being published to

correct this error.

In accordance with section 736(a)(1)

of the Act, the Department will direct

Customs officers to assess, upon further

advice by the administering authority,

antidumping duties equal to the amount

by which the normal value of the

merchandise exceeds the export price or

constructed export price of the

merchandise for all entries of SRAMs

from Taiwan. These antidumping duties

will be assessed on all unliquidated

entries of SRAMs from Taiwan entered,

or withdrawn from warehouse, for

consumption on or after October 1,

1997, the date on which the Department

published its preliminary determination

in the Federal Register (62 FR 51442).

On or after the date of publication of

this notice in the Federal Register,

Customs officers must require, at the