alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MANUEL BAEZ,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 433 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 5th day of February, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
#### State v. Martinez

110,273

07/24/2015

Denied

Unpublished
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 74 (Thursday, April 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 18749]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-9965]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

Washington University; Notice of Decision on Application for 
Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Instrument

    This decision is made pursuant to section 6(c) of the Educational, 
Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-
651, 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). Related records can be viewed 
between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. in room 4211, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, 14th and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.
    Docket Number: 96-136. Applicant: Washington University, St. Louis, 
MO 63130-4899. Instrument: Mass Spectrometer, Model MAT 252. 
Manufacturer: Finnigan MAT, Germany. Intended Use: See notice at 62 FR 
5619, February 6, 1997.
    Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. No instrument of 
equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument, for such 
purposes as it is intended to be used, is being manufactured in the 
United States. Reasons: The foreign instrument provides: (1) Automated 
preparation and isotopic analysis of carbonate, CO2 and O2 
microsamples, (2) an ion collection system with 460 mm deflection 
radius and (3) mass range of 1-150 at 10 kV. These capabilities are 
pertinent to the applicant's intended purposes and we know of no other 
instrument or apparatus of equivalent scientific value to the foreign 
instrument which is being manufactured in the United States.
Frank W. Creel,
Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff.
[FR Doc. 97-9965 Filed 4-16-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-M
```
##### 



Exhibit 10.48
 
 PERSONAL& CONFIDENTIAL
  
  Re: Revised Terms of Employment
 (Letter Agreement) (NUCRYST) Terms of Employment).
 1. Severance. Cause
 2. Severability.
 3. Enurement.
 4. Waiver.




---



##### 



5. Entire Agreement.
 6. Modification.
 7. Governing Law.
 8. Independent Legal Advice.
     NUCRYST Pharmaceuticals Inc.Per:  /s/ Thomas E. GardnerThomas E. GardnerPresident & CEO
Chairman of the Board  /s/ Katherine J. TurnerKATHERINE J. TURNER, Ph.D. 2
Exhibit 31.2



THE LUBRIZOL CORPORATION

Rule 13-14(a)
Certification



I, Charles P. Cooley, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The Lubrizol Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based upon such evaluation;



c) disclosed in this report any change in registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|                                         
|/s/    Charles P. Cooley                 
|                                         
|Charles P. Cooley Chief Financial Officer



May 6, 2004



36
##### 



(a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 DATE: May 1, 2007
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Herm RosenmanHerm RosenmanVice President, Finance and Chief Financial
Officer
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report for the year ended December 31, 2010
on Form 10-K (the Annual Report), of Hughes Communications, Inc (the Company) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, we, Pradman P. Kaul and Grant A. Barber, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:



| | (i) | the Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |                                          |  |                                                                                   
|------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 7, 2011 |  | HUGHES COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (Registrant)
|                    |  |                                         
|                    |  |                                          |  | /s/ PRADMAN P. KAUL                                                               
|                    |  | Name:                                    |  | Pradman P. Kaul                                                                   
|                    |  | Title:                                   |  | President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)               
|                    |  |                                         
|                    |  |                                          |  | /s/ GRANT A. BARBER                                                               
|                    |  | Name:                                    |  | Grant A. Barber                                                                   
|                    |  | Title:                                   |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN
STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE COMPANY AND WILL BE RETAINED BY THE COMPANY AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Maureen D. Howley, Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President of the Managing Owner,
Preferred Investment Solutions Corp. (the Managing Owner), of World Monitor Trust III  Series I (Series I), hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:



| | (1) | Series Is Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Series I.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                  
|/s/ Maureen D. Howley                                                             
|Maureen D. Howley Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President March 31, 2006
44 Canal Center Plaza ▪ Suite 310 ▪ Alexandria, Virginia 22314 ▪ Tel: (703) 684-0084 ▪ Fax: (703) 684-0427

VIA E-MAIL

July 9, 2010

Mr. Jeffrey A. Telander

Sector Policies and Programs Division

Metals and Minerals Group (D243-02)

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

109 TW Alexander Drive

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

Mr. William Neuffer

Sector Policies and Programs Division

Metals and Minerals Group (D243-02)

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

109 TW Alexander Drive 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

RE: Submission of Existing Emissions Data- Rock Wool Manufacturing Co.

Dear Messrs. Telander and Neuffer:

The transmission of this data from the North American Insulation Manufacturers Association 

(“NAIMA”) to the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) is in fulfillment of Rock Wool 

Manufacturing Co. and NAIMA’s commitment to provide EPA existing emissions data 

identified in NAIMA’s May 5, 2010 letter to EPA.

NAIMA is submitting .pdf versions via-email of existing emissions data for formaldehyde from 

the Cupola Number 1 and Curing Oven Test Report 2007. In addition, existing emissions data 

for carbon monoxide and particulate matter are also included. This data was collected at Rock 

Wool Manufacturing Co.’s Leeds, Alabama facility. 

Rock Wool Manufacturing Co. has not designated any portion of the data attached hereto as 

confidential business information (“CBI”). With the other company submissions that you will 

receive from NAIMA, CBI will be redacted from the copies sent to you, and the CBI will be 

marked as such and will be sent to:

Mr. Roberto Morales, Document Control Officer

109 T.W. Alexander Drive
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me or Chris Martin at (703) 684-0084. 

We can also be contacted by e-mail at acrane@naima.org or cmartin@naima.org.

Sincerely,

Angus E. Crane

Angus E. Crane

Executive Vice President, General Counsel

North American Insulation Manufacturers Association

Ph: (703) 684-0084 ext. 123

Fax: (703) 684-0427

Attachment
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 607 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 607

Recognizing the month of October 2010 as ``National Principals Month''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 5, 2010

Mr. Dorgan (for himself, Mr. Lugar, Mr. Franken, Mr. Akaka, Mr. Baucus, 
 Mrs. Murray, Mr. Conrad, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Cardin, Mr. Tester, Mr. 
  Begich, Mrs. Lincoln, Mr. Goodwin, Mr. Menendez, Mr. Casey, and Mr. 
 Warner) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

                           September 14, 2010

             Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Recognizing the month of October 2010 as ``National Principals Month''.

Whereas the National Association of Elementary School Principals and the 
        National Association of Secondary School Principals have declared the 
        month of October 2010 as ``National Principals Month'';
Whereas school leaders are expected to be educational visionaries, instructional 
        leaders, assessment experts, disciplinarians, community builders, public 
        relations experts, budget analysts, facility managers, special programs 
        administrators, and guardians of various legal, contractual, and policy 
        mandates and initiatives, as well as being entrusted with our young 
        people, our most valuable resource;
Whereas principals set the academic tone for their schools and work 
        collaboratively with teachers to develop and maintain high curriculum 
        standards, develop mission statements, and set performance goals and 
        objectives;
Whereas the vision, dedication, and determination of a principal provides the 
        mobilizing force behind any school reform effort; and
Whereas the celebration of ``National Principals Month'' would honor elementary, 
        middle level, and high school principals and recognize the importance of 
        school leadership in ensuring that every child has access to a high-
        quality education: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) recognizes the month of October 2010 as ``National 
        Principals Month''; and
            (2) honors the contribution of school principals in the 
        elementary and secondary schools of our Nation by supporting 
        the goals and ideals of ``National Principals Month''.
                                 <all>
```
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 128 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 6, 2012 

Received 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol 

Visitor Center for an event to award the Congressional 

Gold Medal, collectively, to the Montford Point Marines. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR EVENT TO 

4 AWARD THE CONGRESSIONAL GOLD MEDAL 

5 TO THE MONTFORD POINT MARINES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Emancipation Hall in the Capitol 

7 Visitor Center is authorized to be used on June 27, 2012, 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HCON 128 RDS 

1 for an event to award the Congressional Gold Medal, col2 lectively, to the Montford Point Marines. 

3 (b) IMPLEMENTATION.—Physical preparations for 

4 the conduct of the event shall be carried out in accordance 

5 with such conditions as may be prescribed by the Architect 

6 of the Capitol. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 5, 2012. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MELVIN ORTIZ,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 68 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 12th day of July, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
#### State v. Murdoch

107,815

107,816

08/19/13

Denied. ...

Unpublished
#### State v. Guinn

108,383

08/29/13

Denied.

Unpublished
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 661 

To authorize representation by the Senate Legal Counsel in the case of 

McCarthy v. Byrd, et al. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 28, 2010 

Mr. REID (for himself and Mr. MCCONNELL) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

To authorize representation by the Senate Legal Counsel 

in the case of McCarthy v. Byrd, et al. 

Whereas, in the case of McCarthy v. Byrd, et al., Case No. 

1:10–CV–03317, pending in the United States District 

Court for the District of New Jersey, plaintiff has named 

as a defendant the President Pro Tempore of the Senate; 

and 

Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(1) of the 

Ethics in Government Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. §§ 288b(a) 

and 288c(a)(1), the Senate may direct its counsel to defend Members and officers of the Senate in civil actions 

relating to their official responsibilities: Now, therefore, 

be it 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 661 ATS 

1 Resolved, That the Senate Legal Counsel is author2 ized to represent Senator Inouye, the President Pro Tem3 pore of the Senate, in the case of McCarthy v. Byrd, et 

4 al. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7595

JUNIOUS LEE RHUE, JR., Petitioner - Appellant, versus THOMAS R. CARROLL, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:05-hc-00592-BO) Submitted: January 31, 2007 Decided: June 15, 2007 Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Junious Lee Rhue, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Junious Lee Rhue, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order and judgment denying as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition and requests the appointment of counsel on appeal. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude Rhue has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny the motion to appoint counsel and dismiss. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Edwin Antonio Osorio

- Lopez , Appellant

No. 06

- 18

- 00198

- CR v.
The State of Texas , Appellee Appeal from the 115th District Court of Upshur County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 17927 ). Memoran dum Opinion delivered by Justice

van Cleef
, Chief Justice Stevens and Justice Rambin participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find reversible error in the judgment of
the court below. Therefore, we reverse the trial court ’ s co mpetency d eter mination and remand for a new retrosp ective competenc y trial

. T he trial court is in structed to appoint cou nsel

— who will not be a p otential witness at that trial

— to r epresent Osorio

- Lopez at the retrospective competen cy trial

. We further orde r that the appell ee, t he St ate of Texas
, pay all costs of this appeal

.
RENDERED APRIL 28, 2023 BY ORDER OF THE COURT SCOTT E. STEVENS CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey , Clerk
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Randall Fernandez, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of Deltron, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal period ended September 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.   /s/ Randall Fernandez  Name: Randall Fernandez Title: Chief Executive and Financial Officer Date: December 23, 2008