alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2019395EN.01000101.xml

| 22.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 395/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 395/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9579 — ENI/HitecVision/Norwegian Upstream Assets of ExxonMobil)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 395/01)

On 18 November 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9579. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9579. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
#### State v. Alvidrez

109,528

07/21/2015

Denied.

Unpublished
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<MULTIPLIER>        1000
       
<S>                           <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             Mar-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                Apr-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                  Sep-30-1996
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<CASH>                        4401
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 68045
<ALLOWANCES>                  4346
<INVENTORY>                   42316
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              118341
<PP&E>                        81454
<DEPRECIATION>                40319
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                260698
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         63206
<BONDS>                       94822
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         31518
<PREFERRED>                   0
<COMMON>                      12782
<OTHER-SE>                    54074
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  260698
<SALES>                       146693
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              146693
<CGS>                         73782
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 129301
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              55519
<LOSS-PROVISION>              785
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            3978
<INCOME-PRETAX>               17392
<INCOME-TAX>                  6957
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           9517
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  9517
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 1.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                 1.10



</TABLE>
No. 12-6004.

#### Alston *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
#### IN RE: Allana BARONI, Debtor, Allana Baroni, Appellant, v. CIT Bank N.A., FKA OneWest Bank FSB, FKA OneWest Bank NA, Appellee.

No. 16-56618

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted February 6, 2018 * San Francisco, California

Filed February 08, 2018

Richard Lawrence Antognini, Law Office of Richard L. Antognini, Grass Valley, CA, for Appellant

Brian H. Newman, James Kevin Snyder, Esquire, Attorney, Dykema Gossett LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Appellee

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, and D.W. NELSON and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Allana Baroni (“Baroni”) appeals the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s summary judgment rulings in favor of CIT Bank, N.A. (formerly known as “OneWest Bank N.A.”) (“OneW-est”). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

1. Baroni’s note secured by a deed of trust is a “negotiable instrument” under Cal. Com. Code § 3104(a). *Yvanova v. New Century Mortg. Corp.,*62 Cal. 4th 919, 927, 199 Cal.Rptr.3d 66, 365 P.3d 845 (2016) (citing *Creative Ventures, LLC v. Jim Ward & Assocs.,*195 Cal. App. 4th 1430, 1445-46, 126 Cal.Rptr.3d 564 (2011) (applying Commercial Code to promissory note)). That the principal on her note may increase if she fails to pay interest does not render the note non-negotiable. Regardless of any “interest” or additional “charges,” Baroni agreed to pay at the very least $1.61 million—a “fixed amount of money” pursuant § 3104(a).

2. The undisputed evidence establishes OneWest possesses Baroni’s promissory note indorsed in blank. As the “holder of the instrument,” OneWest may “enforce” it in this bankruptcy action. §§ 1201(b)(21)(A), 3301 (internal quotation marks omitted); *see also In re Veal,*450 B.R. 897, 910-11, 917 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2011) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted); *In re Smith,*509 B.R. 260, 266-67 (Bankr. N.D. Cal. 2014) (citations omitted).

*7743. The undisputed evidence further establishes OneWest kept Baroni’s note and the allonges executed pursuant to it in the same folder. As the allonges were “sufficiently affixed” to the note, there is no triable issue of material fact as to whether OneWest may enforce it. *Veal,*450 B.R. at 911 n.24 (citations omitted); *see also*§ 3204(a).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
#### State v. Davis

110,674

07/21/2015

Denied.

Unpublished
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from SEC Form
10-Q. Items 1 through 22 are as of September 30, 1996. Items 23 through 38 are
for the nine months ended September 30, 1996.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                       366674
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                      15234
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                           66286
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                         31931
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  480125
<COMMON>                                         16080
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       112558
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                              65060
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                  193698
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                            129076
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                               23000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                      200
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                  134151
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                   480125
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                       183321
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             12051
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      144168
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      156219
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                          27102
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                              (3354)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                   23748
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          7857
<NET-INCOME>                                     15891
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                    15891
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       (15330)
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                           46058
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.99
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I,
Randall Fernandez, Chief Executive and
Financial Officer of Deltron, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:  (1) the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal period ended September 30,
2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) the
information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.   /s/ Randall
Fernandez  Name: Randall
Fernandez Title: Chief
Executive and Financial Officer Date: January
4, 2010
#### State v. Farley

109,655

09/02/2015

Denied

Unpublished
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the Trustee of Marine Petroleum Trust does hereby certify, to such persons knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 (the Form 10-Q) of Marine Petroleum Trust
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of Marine Petroleum Trust as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.



|                                                                                                                             
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                             
|/s/ Ron E. Hooper                                                                                                            
|Ron E. Hooper                                                                                                                
|Senior Vice President Royalty Management on behalf of U.S. Trust,                                                            
|Bank of America Private Wealth Management, not in its individual capacity but solely as the Trustee of Marine Petroleum Trust

Dated: November 14, 2012

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Marine Petroleum Trust and will be retained by Marine Petroleum Trust and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuant to
Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the
Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of Marine Petroleum Trust, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.
IV 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 24 

Recognizing women serving in the United States Armed Forces. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 3, 2011 

Mrs. MCMORRIS RODGERS (for herself and Mr. BISHOP of Georgia) submitted 

the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee 

on Armed Services 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Recognizing women serving in the United States Armed 

Forces. 

Whereas women have served with distinction in the United 

States Armed Forces since the American Revolution and 

have made significant and lasting contributions to the security of the United States; 

Whereas in 2011, women comprise nearly 16 percent of the 

United States Armed Forces and serve in positions of responsibility in the active and reserve components of the 

Army, Marine Corps, Navy, Air Force, and Coast Guard, 

as compared with less than 5 percent in 1976 when 

women were first integrated into the service academies; 

Whereas women serve at the highest levels in the Department 

of Defense and other governmental organizations contributing to the defense of the United States; and 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HCON 24 IH 

Whereas the accomplishments of generations of women have 

contributed to the history of the United States Armed 

Forces and to the strength of the United States: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That Congress— 

3 (1) recognizes the importance of women to na4 tional defense throughout the history of the United 

5 States; and 

6 (2) encourages the people of the United States 

7 to honor women who have served and who continue 

8 to serve the United States in the United States 

9 Armed Forces. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
No. 12-6339.

#### Mondragon-Pineda *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
KPMG Consent of Independent Auditors



 Exhibit 10.1 
  
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS 
  
 We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-12718, 333-13928 and
333-99783) of Celltech Group plc of our report dated March 17, 2003, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Celltech Group plc as of December 31, 2002 and 2001 and the related consolidated profit and loss accounts, consolidated
statements of total recognized gains and losses, the consolidated statements of cash flow and the consolidated statements of movements in shareholders’ funds for each of the years in the two year period ended December 31, 2002, which report
appears in the December 31, 2002 annual report on Form 20-F of Celltech Group plc. 
  
 Yours faithfully, 
  
 KPMG Audit Plc 
  
 London, England 
 June 30, 2003
|                                                                            
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                              
|View History:                                                               
|                                                                            
|Natural Gas Citygate Price in Connecticut  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                            
|                                                                            
|Natural Gas Citygate Price in Connecticut  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        | 4.15   | 4.20   | 3.67   | 3.16   | 3.27   | 3.46  
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 3.66   | 3.50   | 3.73   | 3.87   | 4.17   | 4.70   | 5.11   | 5.11   | 5.06   | 4.91  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 6.73   | 8.12   | 6.42   | 5.59   | 7.56   | 9.67   | 9.11   | 8.67   | 10.24  | 6.81  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 6.58   | 5.92   | 5.12   | 5.42   | 5.61   | 4.07   | 3.57   | 4.44   | 5.55   | 5.36  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 4.93   | 6.09   | 7.93   | 5.82   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 70 (Friday, April 11, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 17749]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-9435]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 96-207; RM-8874]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Cawker City, KS

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission, at the request of Ruby J. Hoeflicker, allots 
Channel 242C3 to Cawker City, Kansas, as the community's first local 
aural transmission service. See 61 FR 55125, October 24, 1996. Channel 
242C3 can be allotted to Cawker City in compliance with the Commission 
minimum distance separation requirements without the imposition of a 
site restriction. The coordinates for Channel 242C3 at Cawker City are 
39-30-30 NL and 98-25-54 WL. With this action, this proceeding is 
terminated.

DATES: Effective May 19, 1997. The window period for filing 
applications will open on May 19, 1997, and close on June 19, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pam Blumenthal, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MM Docket No. 96-207, adopted March 26, 1997, and 
released April 4, 1997. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW, Washington, DC. 
The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractor, ITS, Inc., (202) 857-3800, 2100 M Street, 
NW, Suite 140, Washington, DC 20037.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

    Part 73 of title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

47 CFR PART 73--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for Part 73 continues to read as follows:
    Authority: Secs. 303, 48 Stat., as amended, 1082;47 U.S.C. 154, 
as amended.

Sec. 73.202 [Amended]

    2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Kansas, is 
amended by adding Cawker City, Channel 242C3.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 97-9435 Filed 4-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
        THE
        SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Lufkin Industries, Inc. (the “Company”)
        on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities
        and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, R. D. Leslie,
        Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
        adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the:
 
 (1)
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d), as
                  applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
 
 (2)
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the
                  Company.
 
 /s/
        R. D.
        Leslie
 
 R.
        D.
        Leslie
 Chief
        Financial Officer
 August
        7, 2006
 
 This
        certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. §1350, and not for any
        other purpose.
#### State v. Armesto-Murphy

106,441

04/08/13

Denied

Unpublished
EXHIBIT 12  Madison Gas and Electric Company Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 (In thousands)   EarningsNet income before minority interest$25,948Equity earnings(4,277)Income distribution from equity investees3,362Minority interest in pretax income(1,511)Amortization of capitalized interest148Interest capitalized(1,323)Federal and state income taxes14,880Fixed charges11,414Total Earnings as Defined$48,641Fixed ChargesInterest expense on long-term debt and other$7,753Interest on rentals*1,963Amortization of debt issuance costs326AFUDC - borrowed funds49Capitalized interest1,323Total Fixed Charges$11,414Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges4.26X  *Management believes that using one-third of the total rental expense gives a reasonable approximation for actual interest on rentals.