alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                  
|View History:                                                                   
|                                                                                
|Wyoming Natural Gas Deliveries to Electric Power Consumers  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                
|                                                                                
|Wyoming Natural Gas Deliveries to Electric Power Consumers  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 95     | 271    | 167   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 1,843  | 2,727  | 3,764  | 2,484  | 532    | 576    | 827    | 2,024  | 1,088  | 1,079 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 592    | 418    | 496    | 535    | 831    | 1,233  | 1,514  | 1,307  | 1,873  | 3,271 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 5,727  | 7,922  | 10,408 | 14,856 |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
#### SCHNELLER, J. v. ZITOMER, M.

3344 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/18/2017

Reargument Denied 9/13/2017

2007-05040-CA (Chester)

Affirmed
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

Exhibit 10.2  


 
  Certification of Chief Financial Officer    
    



        Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Wimm-Bill-Dann
Foods OJSC (the "Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that: 



        (i)    the
accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2002 (the  "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and 


        (ii)   the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 



	Date: June 27, 2003	/s/  VLADIMIR V. PREOBRAJENSKY      
 Vladimir V. Preobrajensky

Chief Financial Officer





        The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof,
regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing. 











QuickLinks


Certification of Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 31.3  Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14 and 15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934   I, Gary J. Wolter, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Madison Gas and Electric Company;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; and  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.   /s/ Gary J. Wolter Gary J. Wolter Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer Date: August 7, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 63 (Wednesday, April 2, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15742-15743]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-8278]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration


Advisory Circular; Turbine Engine Vibration Survey

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of issuance Advisory Circular (AC) on turbine engine 
vibration survey.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the issuance of Advisory Circular (AC), 
No. 33.83, Turbine Engine Vibration Survey. This AC is on the subject 
of vibration tests and surveys. A set of improved and harmonized 
requirements were incorporated into part 33 of the Federal Aviation 
Regulations (FAR's), and this AC is meant to provide information and 
guidance concerning an acceptable method, but not the only method, for 
complying with those new harmonized requirements.

DATES: Advisory Circular No. 33.83 was issued by the New England 
Aircraft Certification Service, Engine and the Propeller Directorate on 
February 14, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

[[Page 15743]]

Thomas Boudreau, Engine and Propeller Standards Staff, ANE-110, 12 New 
England Executive Park, Burlington, MA, 01803, telephone (617) 238-
7117, fax (617) 238-7199.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    This AC is on the subject of vibration tests and surveys, and was 
identified as one where differences existed between the Joint Aviation 
Requirements--Engines, and part 33 of the Federal Aviation Regulations 
(FAR's). A study group composed of representatives of the Federal 
Aviation Administration, the Joint Aviation Authorities, Transport 
Canada and industry worked to produce a set of improved and harmonized 
requirements that was subsequently incorporated into part 33 of the 
FAR.
    Interested parties were given the opportunity to review and comment 
on the draft AC during the proposal and development phases. Notice was 
published in the Federal Register on April 18, 1995 (60 FR 19442), to 
announce the availability of, and comment to the draft AC.
    This advisory circular, published under the authority granted to 
the Administrator by 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 4113, 44701-44702, 44704, 
provides guidance for these new requirements that were published in the 
Federal Register on June 4, 1996 (61 FR 28430).

    Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on March 25, 1997.
James C. Jones,
Acting Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft 
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 97-8278 Filed 4-1-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

Exhibit 4.6  


 
  AMENDMENT NO. 2
  
    TO
  
    INVERNESS MEDICAL INNOVATIONS, INC.
  
    2001 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN    
    


        The Inverness Medical Innovations, Inc. 2001 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the "Plan") is hereby amended by deleting the first sentence of
Section 3(a) of the Plan and replacing it with the following: 



"The
maximum number of shares of Stock reserved and available for issuance under the Plan shall be 5,324,081 shares, subject to adjustment as provided in Section 3(b)." 


Except
as herein amended, the provisions of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect. 




AS
APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS: March 10, 2003 


AS
APPROVED BY THE STOCKHOLDERS: May 21, 2003 









QuickLinks


AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO INVERNESS MEDICAL INNOVATIONS, INC. 2001 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN
##### 



EXHIBIT 13.2 Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of
title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Copa Holdings, S.A. (the Company), does
hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that: The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006 of the Company fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the
Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated: July 2, 2007 /s/ Victor Vial

Victor Vial

Chief Financial Officer
#### GATOR BORING & TRENCHING, INC., Petitioner, v. WESTRA CONSTRUCTION CORP., a Florida corporation; Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America, a Connecticut company; and Tampa Electric Company, Respondents.

Case No. 2D16-1264

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 1, 2017.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Diana L. Moreland, Judge.

Dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 104 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 104

   Expressing the sense of Congress that the people of Baluchistan, 
  currently divided between Pakistan, Iran, and Afghanistan, have the 
    right to self-determination and to their own sovereign country.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 17, 2012

   Mr. Rohrabacher (for himself, Mr. Gohmert, and Mr. King of Iowa) 
 submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   Expressing the sense of Congress that the people of Baluchistan, 
  currently divided between Pakistan, Iran, and Afghanistan, have the 
    right to self-determination and to their own sovereign country.

Whereas the people of Baluchistan have maintained a proud and distinctive 
        national, cultural, and religious identity dating back to ancient times;
Whereas in 1666, the Baluch Khanate of Kalat was founded which functioned as an 
        independent, sovereign country;
Whereas in the 19th century, the Baluch people were conquered and divided by the 
        imperialist expansion of Persia (Iran) and the British Empire;
Whereas, on August 15, 1947, the Khan of Kalat declared independence, only to 
        have Baluch aspirations crushed by an invasion by Pakistan in April 1948 
        followed by 2 years of a bloody campaign to stamp out popular 
        resistance;
Whereas revolts in 1958, 1973, and 2005 indicate continued popular discontent 
        against rule by Islamabad, and the plunder of its vast natural wealth 
        while Baluchistan remains the poorest province in Pakistan;
Whereas a popular insurgency is also under way in Sistan-Baluchistan and being 
        met by brutal repression by the dictatorship in Iran which has added 
        religious bigotry to tyranny; and
Whereas it is the policy of the United States to oppose aggression and the 
        violation of human rights inherent in the subjugation of national groups 
        as currently being shown in Iran and Pakistan against the aspirations of 
        the Baluch people: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that the people of Baluchistan, 
currently divided between Pakistan, Iran, and Afghanistan, have the 
right to self-determination and to their own sovereign country and they 
should be afforded the opportunity to choose their own status among the 
community of nations, living in peace and harmony, without external 
coercion.
                                 <all>
```
No. 12-6046.

#### Laihben *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
|                                                                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                    
|View History:                                                                                     
|                                                                                                  
|Natural Gas Delivered to Consumers in Massachusetts (Including Vehicle Fuel)  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                  
|                                                                                                  
|Natural Gas Delivered to Consumers in Massachusetts (Including Vehicle Fuel)  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |         | 400,273 | 356,942 | 342,136
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 340,923 | 345,916 | 388,972 | 402,003 | 370,777 | 376,257 | 369,166 | 406,968 | 405,562 | 394,759
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 428,471 | 444,537 | 412,637 | 418,241 | 413,860 | 433,991 | 419,448 | 440,735 | 430,438 | 418,280
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 380,527 | 385,197 | 415,148 | 354,365 |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EDWARD VINCENT RAY, Jr.,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

A. RIBERA, Water and Sewer Plant

Supervisor at CCI; B. CATES, Chief Deputy

Warden at CCI; J. GUTIERREZ, Associate

Warden at CCI,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 20

- 15021

D.C. No. 1:19

- cv

- 01561

- AWI

- SKO

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Anthony W. Ishii, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 12, 2022 * *

Before: SCHROEDER, R. NELSON, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Edward Vincent Ray, Jr. app eals pro se from the

district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action after denying

Ray’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). We have jurisdiction under 28

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JUL 19 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 20

- 15021

U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s interpretation and

application of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Andrews v. Cervantes , 493 F.3d 1047, 1052

(9th Cir. 2007). We affirm.

The district court properly denied Ray’s motion to proceed IFP because Ray

had filed at least three prior actions that were dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or

for failure to state a claim, and Ray did not plausibly allege that he was “under

imminent danger of serious physical injury” at the time he lodged the complaint.

See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); Andrews , 493 F.3d at 1053, 1055

- 56 (discussing the

im minent danger exception to § 1915(g)).

We do not consider arguments and allegations raised for the first time on

appeal. See Padgett v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 7528** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. SHYHEEM LEE SMITH , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Columbia
. Cameron McGowan Currie , District Judge. ( 3:06

- cr - 01126

- CMC

- 1; 3:10

- cv - 70182

- CMC )

Submitted : May 26, 2011 Decided: May 31, 2011

Before KING , SHEDD , and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opi nion
. Shyheem Lee Smith , Appellant Pro Se
. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Shyheem Lee Smith seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2010 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (B) (200 6 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or w rong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable , and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Smith has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials3 before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSED