alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
parfittconsultingagmt



                        AGREEMENT BETWEEN MEIER WORLDWIDE
                          INTERMEDIA AND DAVID PARFITT


Meier Worldwide Intermedia, a Nevada corporation having an office at Suite 320 -
1100 Melville St., Vancouver, BC V6E 4A6, Canada ("The Company"), and David
Parfitt who resides at #4 Silver Fir Close, Hednesford, Cannock Scaffs, WS
12-4SU, United Kingdom ("Parfitt"), herewith enter into an agreement whereby
Parfitt agrees to provide Strategic Business Consulting Services to The Company.

Parfitt, upon execution of this Agreement, shall receive Two hundred and Fifty
Thousand (250,000) shares of Meier Worldwide Intermedia common stock.

The terms and conditions of services rendered under this Agreement shall be
exclusive and interpreted pursuant to the laws of British Columbia, Canada. This
Agreement shall continue in full force and effect for one year from the date of
execution hereof, and may be terminated thereafter by either party upon thirty
days written notice.

AGREED:


/s/ John Meier                                   /s/ David Parfitt
John Meier, President                            David Parfitt
Meier Worldwide Intermedia


June 23, 2003                                   June 20, 2003
Date                                            Date
Exhibit (4)(a)(i)



 Exhibit (4)(a)(i) 
  
 GE CAPITAL LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK 
 GUARANTEE ACCOUNT ENDORSEMENT 

  
 The Contract, to which this endorsement is attached, is amended by adding the following sentence to the Guarantee Account section: 
  
 We reserve the right to limit or restrict amounts that may be allocated or transferred to the
Guarantee Account. 
  
 This endorsement is effective on the Contract Date unless
another date is specified on the Contract data pages. 
  
 For GE Capital Life
Assurance Company of New York, 
  
  
 /s/    Pamela S. Schutz 
 Pamela S. Schutz 
         President
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF UPWARD TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION AS OF AND FOR THE SIX
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         199,521
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               199,943
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 199,943
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,127
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       162,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      36,816
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,241
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,396
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,845
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,845
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,845
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL,

 Petitioner

v.

ROBERT L. REICHLE

 Respondent 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 2345 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

No. 205 DB 2015

Attorney Registration No. 47150

(Allegheny County)

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 13th day of February, 2017, upon consideration of the Verified 

Statement of Resignation, Robert L. Reichle is disbarred on consent from the Bar of the 

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, see Pa.R.D.E. 215, and he shall comply with the 

provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217. Respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board 

pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).
#### Clark v. Eaton Corporation

110,587

08/04/2015

Denied.

Unpublished
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-1478

ASHUKEM TARH NKWANYUO, Petitioner,
versus JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General of the United States, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A77-892-913) Submitted: March 31, 2004 Decided: April 14, 2004 Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bokwe G. Mofor, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Margaret J. Perry, Senior Litigation Counsel, Deborah N. Misir, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Ashukem Tarh Nkwanyuo, a native and citizen of Cameroon, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reopen and reconsider. On April 12, 2002, the Board entered an order affirming the immigration judge’s order denying asylum and other forms of relief. Nkwanyuo did not file a petition for review from that order. He did file a motion to reopen and reconsider with the Board. The Board denied the motion to reconsider because it was untimely. It denied the motion to reopen because the proffered evidence did not alter the finding that Nkwanyuo failed to present a credible claim for asylum. To the extent Nkwanyuo challenges the April 12 order, we are without jurisdiction to review it because he did not file a timely petition for review from that order. See8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1) (2000); Stone v. INS , 514 U.S. 386, 405 (1995). The filing of a motion to reopen or reconsider with the Board does not toll the thirty-day period for seeking review of the underlying order. Id. at 394. The Board’s denial of the motion to reconsider is not a question before us. We review the denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion. 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2003); INS v. Doherty , 502 U.S. 314, 323-24 (1992). “A motion to reopen proceedings shall not be granted unless it appears to the Board that evidence sought- 3 - to be offered is material and was not available and could not have been discovered or presented at the former hearing . . . .” 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(l) (2003). We find the Board did not abuse its discretion denying the motion to reopen. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
No. 12-338.

#### Kurschinske *v.*Meadville Forging Co.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 99.3

GMAC Mortgage
----


February 28, 2006

RESIDENTIAL ASSET MORTGAGE PRODUCTS
TRUST ADMINISTRATION
c/o DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST
1761 EAST ST. ANDREW PLACE
SANTA ANA, CA 92705


Re:   Annual Officers Statement of Compliance
      Year Ending 2005
      GMACM Investor Agreement # 41488  2005-J1

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

GMAC Mortgage Corporation ("GMACM") hereby certifies to the best of our
knowledge and belief, that for the calendar year 2005:

1.    A review of the activities of the Seller / Servicer and of performance
      according to the Seller / Servicer contract has been made under such
      Officer's supervision.

2.    To the best of the undersigned Officer's knowledge, and based on such
      review, the Seller / Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under this
      Agreement for such year.

3.    GMACM is currently an approved FNMA and FHLMC Servicer in good standing.

4.    If applicable, GMACM has filed the information returns with respect to the
      receipt of mortgage interest pursuant to Sections 6050H, 6050J and 6050P
      of the Code, received in a trade or business, reports of foreclosures and
      abandonment's of any Mortgaged Property and the information returns
      relating to cancellation of indebtedness income with respect to any
      Mortgaged Property.

5.    All hazard, flood, FHA mortgage insurance and primary mortgage insurance
      premiums, taxes, ground rents, assessments and other lienable items have
      been paid in connection with the mortgaged properties.

6.    All property inspections have been completed as required.

7.    Compliance relative to Adjustable Rate Mortgages has been met.

8.    Fidelity Bond and Errors and Omissions Insurance coverage is current, in
      full force and effect.


Servicer:      GMAC Mortgage Corporation

By:            /s/ Michael Kacergis
               ----------------------------------------------

Name:          Michael Kacergis

Title:         Manager
               Enterprise Risk Management
               Enterprise Servicing Group Risk and Compliance


GMAC Mortgage Corporation
500 Enterprise Road
Horsham, PA 19044
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 73 (Thursday, April 16, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18935-18936]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10111]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA)

    In accordance with Department of Justice policy, notice is hereby 
given that on March 20, 1998, a proposed Consent Decree in United 
States v. Madison Metropolitan Sewerage District (``MMSD''), Case 
Number 98-C-0197-S, was lodged in the United States District Court for 
the Western District of Wisconsin. The Complaint filed by the United 
States sought to require MMSD to perform a remedial action selected by 
U.S. EPA for the Site, and to pay U.S. EPA's future oversight costs as 
well as all of the United States' unreimbursed past response costs 
incurred by the United States pursuant to CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9601 et. 
seq. The Consent Decree requires Defendant MMSD to reimburse the United 
States in the amount of $33,565.23.
    The Department of Justice will receive for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication comments concerning the proposed 
Consent Decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney 
General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, U.S. Department of 
Justice, P.O. Box 7611, Ben Franklin Station, Washington, D.C. 20044, 
and should refer to United States v. Madison Metropolitan Sewerage 
District, D.J. Ref. No. 90-11-2-1316.
    The proposed Consent Decree may be examined at any of the following 
offices: (1) the United States Attorney for the Western District of 
Wisconsin, Suite 200, 600 West Washington Ave., P.O. Box 1585, Madison, 
WI 53701-1585 (contact Assistant United States Attorney Mark Cameli); 
(2) the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson 
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604-3590 (contact Assistant Regional 
Counsel Thomas Krueger); and at the Consent Decree Library, 1120 G 
Street, N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20005, 202-624-0892.

[[Page 18936]]

Copies of the proposed Consent Decree may be obtained in person or by 
mail from the Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street, N.W., 4th Floor, 
Washington, D.C. 20005, telephone (202) 624-0892. For a copy of the 
Consent Decree please enclose a check in the amount of $24.25 (25 cents 
per page reproduction costs) payable to Consent Decree Library.
Joel M. Gross,
Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and 
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 98-10111 Filed 4-15-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 13, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00013

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF C.W.L., G.L.L, L.R. III., AND A.R., CHILDREN

,

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. 15759A

Honorabl e Cathy Morris, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

On January 7, 2019 , a ppellant filed a notice of appeal appealing the trial court’s order terminating parental rights signed on M arch 1 , 201 7. Appellant’s notice of appeal is untimely

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 26.1(b) (providing that the notice of appeal in an accelerated appeal is due within twenty days of the signing of the judgment), 28.4(a) (providing that appeals in parental termination cases are accelerated). Absent a timely notice of appeal, t his court lacks jurisdiction over the appeal. See Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997) (holding that once extension period has passed, a party can no l onger invoke an appellate court’ s jurisdiction).

In addition, the March 1, 2017 order appellant seeks to appeal was the subject of an appeal in this court assigned cause number 04

- 17

- 00144

- CV. On August 30, 2017, this court issued a memorandum opinion affirming the trial court’s March 1, 2017 order terminating appellant’s rights to his mi nor children. See In re L.R., III

, No. 04

- 17

- 00144

- CV, 2017 WL 3722029, at *1 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio Aug. 30, 2017, no pet.) (mem. op.). The mandate

issued on January 18, 2018. Our plenary power over this appeal has expired, and we no longer have juris diction to consider appellant’s complaints in relation to the March 1, 2017 order. See

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 19

. 1, 19.3.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that appellant show cause in writing within 2 0 days from the date this order why this ap peal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All other appellate deadlines are SUSPENDED pending our resolution of the jurisdictional issue.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 13th day of February, 2 019

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND INCOME STATEMENT AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>      1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                             JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         1,181
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 21,292
<ALLOWANCES>                                     372
<INVENTORY>                                   43,806
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              72,102
<PP&E>                                        19,029
<DEPRECIATION>                                 9,583
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               100,770
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         52,664
<BONDS>                                        2,100
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          1,000
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                          53
<OTHER-SE>                                    28,049
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 100,770
<SALES>                                       86,068
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              86,068
<CGS>                                         66,207
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 79,173
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,552
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                5,343
<INCOME-TAX>                                   2,057
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            3,286
<DISCONTINUED>                                (3,026)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                     260
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   0.04


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 75 (Monday, April 20, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 19557]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10268]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 2787]


Ofice of International Energy Policy; Notice of Receipt of 
Application for a Permit for Pipeline Facilities to be Constructed and 
Maintained on the Borders of the United States

AGENCY: Department of State.
    The Department of State has received an application from Lakehead 
Pipe Line Company, Limited for Presidential Permit, pursuant to 
Executive Order 11423 of August 16, 1968, as amended by Executive Order 
12847 of May 17, 1993, to construct, connect, operate and maintain a 
pipeline at the site of its existing facilities on the U.S.-Canada 
International border near Neche, North Dakota. The pipeline will be 
utilized to transport crude oil and natural gas liquids. Lakehead is a 
Delaware limited partnership, having its principal office in Deluth, 
Minnesota.
    The permit application and related documents are available for 
review at the address provided below.

DATES: Interested parties are invited to submit, in duplicate, comments 
relative to this proposal on or before May 20, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daniel L. Martinez, Office of 
International Energy Policy, Department of State, Washington, D.C. 
20520. Tel: (202) 647-4557.

    Dated: March 27, 1998.
William A. Weingarten,
Director, Office of International Energy Policy.
[FR Doc. 98-10268 Filed 4-17-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-07-M
### MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 10

- 00699

- CR Charles Daren MIEARS , Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 216th Judicial District Court , Kerr County, Texas Trial Court No. A0690 Honorable N. Keith Williams , Judge Presiding Opinion by: Steven C. Hilbig, Justice Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice Delivered and Filed: September 7, 2011 MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED; AFFIRMED Charles Daren Miears pled guilty to delivery of more than one but less than four grams of methamphetamine in a drug free zone and pled true to being a habitual offender in exchange for the State’s recommendation that adjudication be deferred. Pursuant to the plea agreement, the trial court deferred adjudication and placed Miears on community supervision for a period of ten
years. The State later filed a motion to adjudicate guilt, alleging Miears violated various04

- 10

- 00699

- CR

- 2

- co nditions of h is community supervision. Miears pled true to the allegations. The trial court adjudicated Miears guilty and sentenced him to forty years in prison. Miears ’s court

- appointed appellate attorney filed a motion to withdraw and a brief in whic h he raises no arguable points of error and concludes this appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), High v.
State , 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978), and Gainous v. State , 43 6 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). Miears was provided a copy of the brief and motion to withdraw and was informed of his right to review the record and file his own brief. He has not done so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s brief, we find no reversible error and agree with counsel the appeal is wholly frivolous. See Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824, 826

- 27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We therefore grant the motion to withdraw and affirm the trial court’s judgment. See id .; Nichols v. State , 954 S.W.2d 83, 86 (Tex. App.

– San Antonio 1997, no pet.);
Bruns v. State , 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.

– San Antonio 1996, no pet.). No substitute counsel will be appointed. Should Miears wish to seek further review of this case by the Texas Court of Crim inal Appeals, he must either retain an attorney to file a petition for discretionary review or file a pro se petition for discretionary review. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed within thirty days after either this opinion is rendered or the last timely motion for rehearing or motion for en banc reconsideration is overruled by this
court. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 68.2. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed with the clerk of the Court of Criminal Appeals

. See id. R. 68.3. Any petition for discretionary review must comply with the requirements of rule 68.4 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See id. R. 68.4. Steven C. Hilbig, Justice DO NOT PUBLISH
No. 12-188.

#### Lewis *v.*Auto Club Family Insurance Co., dba AAA Insurance.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**Exhibit 32.2***Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MGE Energy, Inc. for the period endedSeptember 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof("the Report"), I, Terry A. Hanson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

1.	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

  /s/ Terry A. Hanson  ___________________________________________  Terry A. Hanson  Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary  Date: November 9, 2004
#### State v. Lassiter

110,631

07/21/2015

Denied

Unpublished