alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 584 

Commemorating the 2010 Special Olympics USA National Games. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 15, 2010 

Mr. JOHANNS submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

RESOLUTION 

Commemorating the 2010 Special Olympics USA National 

Games. 

Whereas the 2010 Special Olympics USA National Games 

will be held in Lincoln, Nebraska, from July 18 to July 

23, 2010; 

Whereas nearly 4,000 athletes and coaches from 49 State 

delegations will participate in the Games; 

Whereas approximately 30,000 people, including families and 

friends of the athletes, and enthusiastic supporters, are 

expected to visit or attend the Games; 

Whereas more than 8,500 volunteers will contribute time and 

talent to make the Games a success; 

Whereas, for decades, the Special Olympics has provided athletes with a unique opportunity to participate in athletic 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 584 IS 

competition while developing confidence, skill, and determination; 

Whereas the 2010 Special Olympics USA National Games 

continues the great tradition begun by Eunice Shriver in 

1968, and proves the belief of Ms. Shriver that through 

sports, people with intellectual disabilities ‘‘can realize 

their potential for growth’’; 

Whereas 70 Nebraska communities are participating in the 

Law Enforcement Torch Run, in which law enforcement 

officials from the State of Nebraska and across the 

United States carry the ‘‘Flame of Hope’’ through Nebraska; and 

Whereas the State of Nebraska, the city of Lincoln, and more 

than 100 State and local businesses and organizations 

have made major contributions and opened their doors so 

that people from across the United States can participate 

in and enjoy the 2010 Special Olympics USA National 

Games: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) applauds the participants and coaches of 

3 the 2010 Special Olympics USA National Games, as 

4 well as the volunteers and law enforcement officers 

5 who support the Games; and 

6 (2) thanks all the people who contributed to the 

7 Games for their generous efforts and gifts to make 

8 the Games a reality. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 74 (Thursday, April 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 18796]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-9984]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Minerals Management Service


Agency Information Collection Activities: Submitted for Office of 
Management and Budget Review; Comment Request

    The proposal for the collection of information listed below has 
been submitted to the Office of Management and Budget for reapproval 
under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 
35). Copies of the proposed information collection requirement and 
related forms and explanatory material may be obtained by contacting 
Dennis C. Jones at (303) 231-3046. Comments and suggestions on the 
requirement should be made directly to the Bureau Clearance Officer at 
the telephone number listed below, and to the OMB Paperwork Reduction 
Project (1010-0064), Washington, D.C. 20503, telephone number (202) 
395-7340.

    Dates: Written comments should be received on or before May 19, 
1997.
    Title: Payor Information Form, Solid Minerals.
    OMB Approval Number: 1010-0064.
    Abstract: The Minerals Management Service (MMS) Royalty Management 
Program (RMP) is proposing to continue collecting certain information 
from royalty payors on Federal or Indian mineral leases in order to 
establish and maintain a database consisting of royalty information and 
reference data.
    Bureau Form Numbers: MMS-4030.
    Frequency: As submitted by lessee.
    Description of Respondents: Royalty payors on Federal and Indian 
mineral leases.
    Estimated Completion Time: .33 hours.
    Annual Responses: 130.
    Annual Burden Hours: 173 hours.
    Bureau Clearance Officer: Joanne Lauterbach, (202) 208-7744.

    Dated April 14, 1997.
Donald Sant,
(Acting) Associate Director for Royalty Management.
[FR Doc. 97-9984 Filed 4-16-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MR-P
No. 12-5759.

#### Jones *v.*Ochoa, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF RUSSELL CORPORATION FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-04-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                           5,062
<SECURITIES>                                       560
<RECEIVABLES>                                  258,776
<ALLOWANCES>                                    11,977
<INVENTORY>                                    379,948
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               656,202
<PP&E>                                       1,069,854
<DEPRECIATION>                                 564,587
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,229,214
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          231,572
<BONDS>                                        277,392
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           414
<OTHER-SE>                                     643,662
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,229,214
<SALES>                                        548,412
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               548,412
<CGS>                                          376,698
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  376,698
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               111,533
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,536
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,040
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 45,605
<INCOME-TAX>                                    17,643
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             27,962
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    27,962
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.72


</TABLE>
#### COM. v. BOOTH, R.

1773 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/07/2017

Reargument Denied 8/25/2017

CP-51-CR-0005705-2015 (Philadelphia)

Reversed/Remanded
EXHIBIT 23(B)

                               CONSENT OF EXPERTS

     As petroleum engineers, we hereby consent to the incorporation by reference
in the Prospectuses constituting part of the Registration Statements on Form S-8
(Nos. 33-37175, 33-44541, 33-44542, 33-58613, 33-59253 and 33-59255) and Form
S-3 (No. 333-00753) of Santa Fe Energy Resources, Inc. of our oil and gas
reserve reports as of December 31, 1992, December 31, 1993, December 31, 1994
and December 31, 1995 included in the Santa Fe Resources, Inc. Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 1995.

                                          RYDER SCOTT COMPANY
                                          PETROLEUM ENGINEERS

Houston, Texas
February 27, 1996
|                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                           
|View History:                                                            
|                                                                         
|Natural Gas Citygate Price in Nebraska  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                         
|                                                                         
|Natural Gas Citygate Price in Nebraska  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        | 4.07   | 3.88   | 3.42   | 2.99   | 3.03   | 2.91  
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 2.95   | 2.75   | 2.91   | 3.46   | 2.98   | 2.49   | 3.07   | 4.24   | 3.02   | 3.12  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 4.52   | 6.23   | 4.09   | 5.70   | 6.70   | 8.21   | 8.27   | 7.67   | 8.12   | 5.87  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 5.62   | 5.11   | 4.31   | 4.61   | 5.58   | 4.32   | 3.75   | 4.31   | 4.11   | 3.65  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 3.23   | 6.60   | 7.07   | NA     |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2019150EN.01001401.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2.5.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 150/14 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9307 — Onex/AEG/JV)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 150/07)

1.

On 24 April 2019, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2019150EN.01001401-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Onex Corporation (‘Onex’, Canada), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Anschutz Entertainment Group, Inc. (‘AEG’, USA), controlled by The Anschutz Corporation (USA). |

Onex and AEG acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of a newly created company constituting a joint venture (the ‘JV’), which will be called ASM Global (‘ASM’).

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares in a newly created company constituting a joint venture.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for Onex: a private equity business engaged in the provision of investment management services to a number of investment funds. Onex controls a number of portfolio companies which are active across multiple industry sectors,

—   for AEG: sports and live entertainment.

The JV will combine the venue management division of AEG, AEG Facilities LLC, and venue management business of Onex, SMG US Parent, Inc.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2019150EN.01001401-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9307 — Onex/AEG/JV

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2019150EN.01001401-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2019150EN.01001401-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
#### IN RE Jeffrey M. SILOW An Administratively Suspended Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals

No. 17-BG-1082

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

(FILED-December 21, 2017)

Bar Reg. No. 211847

BEFORE: Glickman and McLeese, Associate Judges, and Steadman, Senior Judge.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

On consideration of the certified order disbarring respondent from practice law by consent in the state of Pennsylvania; this court’s October 10, 2017, order temporarily suspending respondent in this case and directing him to show cause why identical reciprocal discipline should not be imposed; and the statement of Disciplinary Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline; and it appearing that respondent did not file a response to the show cause order or the required D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14 (g) affidavit, it is

ORDERED that Jeffrey M. Silow is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia. *See In re Sibley,*990 A.2d 483, 487-88 (D.C. 2010) (explaining that the presumption of identical discipline in D.C. Bar R. XI, § 11 (c) will prevail except in “rare” cases); *In re Cole,*809 A.2d 1226, 1227 n.3 (D.C. 2002) (explaining that in unopposed reciprocal matters the “imposition of identical discipline should be close to automatic”). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that for the purposes of reinstatement the time for reinstatement will not begin to run until such time as respondent files a D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14 (g) affidavit.
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 205492

											

Form 10-Q

[X]    QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES

          EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

          For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003

OR

[  ]     TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES

          EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

          For the transition period from                           to                                       
Commission File Number 000-21267

SUMMIT BANK CORPORATION
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### APPEAL 

### O F 

### F LORIDA 

### S ECOND 

### D ISTRICT RASHIDI ABDU GIBSON, Appellant,
v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 2D20-3230 September 15, 2021. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Michelle Sisco, Judge. Rashidi Abdu Gibson, pro se. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. LaROSE, ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, and LABRIT, JJ., Concur. Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
#### State v. Lynch

107,760

10/28/13

Denied.

Unpublished
# C_2019247EN.01002502.xml

| 23.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 247/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 247/25

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9321 — MRG/PMV/SFPI-FPIM/Euroports)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 247/05)

On 29 May 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9321. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9321. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
FLIGHT OPERATIONS

United Air Lines, Inc.

Flight Operations

233 South Wacker Drive

Chicago, Il 60606

May 24, 2012

Federal Aviation Administration

Attn: Rules Docket, AGC-10

Office of the Chief Counsel

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20591

Re: Exemption 6783

Ladies and Gentlemen:

United Air Lines, Inc., operating certificate CALA 014A, petitions the Administrator for an extension of 

Exemption No. 6783F. This request does not seek a change to the current exemption, which will expire on June 

30, 2012.

Exemption No. 6783F provides relief from 14 CFR 121.434(c)(1)(ii) prescribes, in pertinent part, that if the 

certificate holder's approved training program includes a course of training in an airplane simulator under 14 CFR

121.409(c) and a qualifying PIC is completing initial or upgrade training specified in 14 CFR 121.424, the PIC 

must be observed in the performance of the prescribed duties by an FAA inspector during at least one flight leg 

that includes a takeoff and landing. This exemption permits the airlines, at our discretion, when an FAA inspector 

is not immediately available to provide the required observation of a qualifying PIC.

This exemption has been used for many years with no known compromise to safety.

In accordance with the provision of 14 CFR 11, Subpart A - Rulemaking Procedures, Petitions for Rulemaking and 

for Exemption, Continental Airlines request that a finding of good cause be made for waiving publication in the 

Federal Register. A summary of the original petition was published in the Federal Register and no precedents will 

be set by granting the requested relief. Continental Airlines therefore, requests that the publication and comment 

period be waived.

As required by 14 CFR 11.81 “What information must I include in my petition for an exemption?” a summary of 

this petition is attached.

If you have any questions or need additional information, please call. My office phone number is (872)-825-6572.

Respectfully Submitted,

Maurice J. Montgomery JR

Manager, Flight Operations

cc: J. Starley

D. Lynn

M. Quiello
Exemption Number 6783

May 24, 2012

Page 2

Summary

United Air Lines petitions for an extension of Exemption No. 6783F. This exemption provides 

relief from 14 CFR 121.434(c)(1)(ii) to permit the airline, at our discretion, when an FAA inspector is 

not immediately available to provide observation of a qualifying PIC when completing initial or upgrade 

training as a specified in 14 CFR 121.424, to substitute a qualified and authorized check airman to 

observe the qualifying pilot in command in the performance of prescribed duties subject to certain 

conditions and limitations.
# C_2019347EN.01000201.xml

| 14.10.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 347/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.10.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 347/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8858 — Boeing/Safran/JV (Auxiliary Power Units))

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 347/02)

On 27 September 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8858. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8858. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---