T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T
S E R L I GU NC OR O; AS WANT O, P et i t i o n ers, v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 10- 70958 A ge nc yN os . A 096- 066- 470

A 096- 066- 471 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d J ul y12, 2011 ** B efo re: S C H R O E D E R , A L A R C Ó N , an dL E A V Y , C i rcu i tJu d g es. S e r l i G unc or o, l e a d pe t i t i one r , a nd A s w a nt o, na t i ve s a nd c i t i z e ns of Indo nesi a, pet i t i on for r evi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order d e n y i n g th e i rmo t i o n t o r e c o n s i d e r . O u rj u r i s d i c t i o n i s g o v e rn e db y8 U . S. C. § 1 25 2. W e r evi ew for abu se of di sc re t i on the deni al of a m ot i on t o rec on si der, 

# FI LED JU L 21 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 70958 2 Ca n o -Me r i da v . I

NS , 311 F . 3d 960, 964 ( 9th C i r . 2002) , a nd w e di s m i s s i n pa rta nd d e n yi n p a rtth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. W e l ac k j uri sdi ct i on t o revi ew the B IA ’ s A pri l 29 , 20 08 , order vacat i ng an i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s gr a ntof a s y l um , be c aus e G unc or o f a i l e d t o t i m e l ype t i t i on th is c o u rt f

o rr e v ie w o f

th a t d e c is io n . Se e S i n g h v . I NS , 3 1 5 F .3 d1 1 8 6 , 1 1 8 8 ( 9 th C i r. 20 03 ). T he B I A w a s w i thi n i t s di s c r e t i on i n de ny i ng the N ove m be r17, 2008, m ot i on t o r e c ons i de ron the gr ound tha tthe m ot i on f a i l e d t o i de nt i f

ya nye rr orof f a c t o rla w in th e B I A ’s A p r il 2 9 , 2 0 0 8 , o r d e r . See 8 C . F . R . § 1 00 3. 2(b)(1). W e r e j e c tG unc or o’ s c ont e nt i on tha tthe c a s e s houl d be r e m a nde d i n l i ghtof T am pu bo lon v. H

older , 61 0 F . 3d 10 56 (9th C i r. 20 10 ). T he B IA anal yz ed G unc or o’ s c l a i m s of

pe r s e c ut i on a s a n e thni c C hi ne s e I ndone s i a n unde rthe di s f a vor e d gr oup a na l y s i s , a s s e tf orth i n Sa e l v . A s h c r o

ft , 38 6 F . 3d 92 2 (9th C i r. 2004) , a nd G unc or o doe s notnow a r gue –nordi d s he a r gue t o the a ge nc y–tha ts he ex p eri en ced an y i n d i v i d u al i zed ri skd u e t o h er C h ri st i an i ty. G unc or o c ont e nds the B I A e rr e d i n de ny i ng he rappl i c a t i ons f orw i thhol di ng of re m ov al and rel i ef

un der the C on vent i on A gai nstT orture w i tho utal l ow i ng her a n opportuni tyt o br i e f

the i s s ue s . C ontr a ryt o G unc or o’ s c ont e nt i on, the pr oc e e di ngs w e r e not“ s o f undam e nt a l l yunf

a i rtha t[ s he ] w a s pr e ve nt e d f r om10- 70958 3 re as on abl y pre se nt i ng [her ] ca se . ” Co lm e n a rv . I NS , 21 0 F . 3d 96 7, 97 1 (9th C i r. 20 00 ) ( ci t at i on om i tt ed). M oreover, G un coro fai l ed t o d em on stra t e thataddi t i on al d e v e lo p m e n t o f

th e r e c o r dm a yh a v e a f f e c te dth e o u tc o m e o f

th e p r o c e e d in g s . See id . P E T IT IO N F O R R E V IE W D IS M IS S E D i n p art; D E N IE D i n p art.