Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 68 / Wednesday, April 9, 1997 / Notices 17177

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,

for consumption on or after March 1,

1996. The Department will order the

suspension of liquidation ended for all

such entries and will instruct the

Customs Service to release any cash

deposits or bonds. The Department will

further instruct the Customs Service to

refund with interest any cash deposits

on post-March 1, 1995 entries. (2) The

cash deposit rates for the other reviewed

companies will be those rates

established above (except that, if the

rate for a firm is de minimis, i.e., less

than 0.5 percent, a cash deposit of zero

will be required for that firm). (3) For

previously reviewed or investigated

companies not listed above, the cash

deposit rate will continue to be the

company-specific rate published for the

most recent period. (4) If the exporter is

not a firm covered in this review, a prior

review, or the original LTFV

investigation, but the manufacturer is,

the cash deposit rate will be the rate

established for the most recent period

for the manufacturer of the

merchandise. (5) If neither the exporter

nor the manufacturer is a firm covered

in this or any previous review or the

original investigation, the cash deposit

rate will be 1.51 percent, the ‘‘All

Others’’ rate established in the LTFV

Final Determination (58 FR 11029).

These deposit requirements shall

remain in effect until publication of the

final results of the next administrative

review.

This notice also serves as a final

reminder to importers of their

responsibility under 19 CFR 353.26 to

file a certificate regarding the

reimbursement of antidumping duties

prior to liquidation of the relevant

entries during this review period.

Failure to comply with this requirement

could result in the Secretary’s

presumption that reimbursement of

antidumping duties occurred and the

subsequent assessment of double

antidumping duties.

This notice also serves as a reminder

to parties subject to administrative

protective orders (APOs) of their

responsibility concerning the

disposition of proprietary information

disclosed under APO in accordance

with 19 CFR 353.34(d)(1). Timely

written notification of the return/

destruction of APO materials or

conversion to judicial protective order is

hereby requested. Failure to comply

with the regulations and the terms of an

APO is a sanctionable violation.

This administrative review and notice

are in accordance with section 751(a)(1)

and 751(d) of the Act (19 U.S.C.

1675(a)(1)) and 19 CFR 353.22 and 19

CFR 353.25.

Dated: April 2, 1997.

Robert S. LaRussa,

Acting Assistant Secretary, for Import

Administration.

[FR Doc. 97–9114 Filed 4–8–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

U.S. Automotive Parts Advisory

Committee; Closed Meeting

AGENCY: International Trade

Administration, Commerce.

ACTION: Closed meeting of U.S.

Automotive Parts Advisory Committee.

SUMMARY: The U.S. Automotive Parts

Advisory Committee (the ‘‘Committee’’)

advises U.S. Government officials on

matters relating to the implementation

of the Fair Trade in Auto Parts Act of

1988. The Committee: (1) Reports

annually to the Secretary of Commerce

on barriers to sales of U.S.-made auto

parts and accessories in Japanese

markets; (2) assists the Secretary in

reporting to the Congress on the

progress of sales of U.S.-made auto parts

in Japanese markets, including the

formation of long-term supplier

relationships; (3) reviews and considers

data collected on sales of U.S.-made

auto parts to Japanese markets; (4)

advises the Secretary during

consultations with the Government of

Japan on these issues; and (5) assists in

establishing priorities for the

Department’s initiatives to increase

U.S.-made auto parts sales to Japanese

markets, and otherwise provide

assistance and direction to the Secretary

in carrying out these initiatives. At the

meeting, committee members will

discuss specific trade and sales

expansion programs related to U.S.-

Japan automotive parts policy.

DATE AND LOCATION: The meeting will be

held on April 28, 1997 from 10:30 a.m.

to 3 p.m. at the U.S. Department of

Commerce in Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.

Robert Reck, Office of Automotive

Affairs, Trade Development, Room

4036, Washington, DC. 20230,

telephone: (202) 482–1418.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The

Assistant Secretary for Administration,

with the concurrence of the General

Counsel formally determined on July 5,

1994, pursuant to section 10(d) of the

Federal Advisory Act, as amended, that

the series of meetings or portions of

meetings of the Committee and of any

subcommittee thereof, dealing with

privileged or confidential commercial

information may be exempt from the

provisions of the Act relating to open

meeting and public participation therein

because these items are concerned with

matters that are within the purview of

5 U.S.C. 552b (c) (4) and (9) (B). A copy

of the Notice of Determination is

available for public inspection and

copying in the Department of Commerce

Records Inspection Facility, Room 6020,

Main Commerce.

Dated: April 2, 1997.

Henry P. Misisco,

Director, Office of Automotive Affairs.

[FR Doc. 97–9084 Filed 4–8–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric

Administration

Evaluation of State Coastal

Management Programs and National

Estuarine Research Reserves

AGENCY: Office of Ocean and Coastal

Resource Management, National Ocean

Service, National Oceanic and

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),

DOC.

ACTION: Notice of Availability of

Evaluation Final Findings.

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the

availability of the final evaluation

findings for the Virginia, Maine, New

Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Oregon

Coastal Management Programs, and

Sapelo Island (Georgia) National

Estuarine Research Reserve (NERR).

Sections 312 and 315 of the Coastal

Zone Management Act of 1972 (CZMA),

as amended, require a continuing

review of the performance of coastal

states with respect to approved coastal

management programs and the

operation and management of NERRs.

The States of Virginia, Maine, New

Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Oregon

were found to be implementing and

enforcing their Federally approved

coastal management programs,

addressing the national coastal

management objectives identified in

CZMA section 303(2)(A)–(K), and

adhering to the programmatic terms of

their financial assistance awards.

Sapelo Island NERR was found to be

adhering to programmatic requirements

of the NERR system. Copies of these

final evaluation findings may be

obtained upon written request from:

Vickie Allin, Chief, Policy Coordination

Division, Office of Ocean and Coastal

Resource Management, NOS/NOAA,

1305 East-West Highway, 11th Floor,