alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 5 

Expressing support for prayer at school board meetings. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 6, 2009 

Mr. VITTER submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for prayer at school board meetings. 

Whereas the freedom to practice religion and to express religious thought is acknowledged to be a fundamental and 

unalienable right belonging to all individuals; 

Whereas the United States was founded on the principle of 

freedom of religion and not freedom from religion; 

Whereas the framers intended that the first amendment to 

the Constitution would prohibit the Federal Government 

from enacting any law that favors one religious denomination over another, not prohibit any mention of religion 

or reference to God in civic dialogue; 

Whereas in 1983, the Supreme Court held in Marsh v. Chambers, 463 U.S. 783, that the practice of opening legislative sessions with prayer has become part of the fabric 

of our society and invoking divine guidance on a public 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 5 IS 

body entrusted with making the laws is not a violation 

of the Establishment Clause of the first amendment, but 

rather is simply a tolerable acknowledgment of beliefs 

widely held among the people of the Nation; 

Whereas voluntary prayer in elected bodies should not be limited to prayer in State legislatures and Congress; 

Whereas school boards are deliberative bodies of adults similar to a legislature in that they are elected by the people, 

act in the public interest, and hold sessions that are open 

to the public for voluntary attendance; and 

Whereas voluntary prayer by an elected body should be protected under law and encouraged in society because voluntary prayer has become a part of the fabric of our society, voluntary prayer acknowledges beliefs widely held 

among the people of the Nation, and the Supreme Court 

has held that it is not a violation of the Establishment 

Clause for a public body to invoke divine guidance: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes that prayer before school board 

3 meetings is a protected act in accordance with the 

4 fundamental principles upon which the Nation was 

5 founded; and 

6 (2) expresses support for the practice of prayer 

7 at the beginning of school board meetings. 

Æ 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8
(Nos. 333-91160 and 333-74842) and on Form S-3 (No. 333-145513) of Lawson Software, Inc. of our report dated July 9,
2009 relating to the financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.

|                                                                    |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP Minneapolis, Minnesota
July 15, 2009 |  | 

---
|                                                                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                    
|View History:                                                                                     
|                                                                                                  
|Percent of Industrial Natural Gas Deliveries in South Carolina Represented by the Price  (Percent)
|                                                                                                  
|                                                                                                  
|Percent of Industrial Natural Gas Deliveries in South Carolina Represented by the Price  (Percent)
|                                                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 86.9   | 86.7   | 86.1  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 86.5   | 82.1   | 87.7   | 78.5   | 77.8   | 77.4   | 71.4   | 47.3   | 47.3   | 47.6  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 46.3   | 45.4   | 45.1   | 45.6   | 43.6   | 42.9   | 41.3   | 40.8   | 40.4   | 38.5  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 36.9   | 36.7   | 37.2   | 36.7   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 70 (Friday, April 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 17831]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-9370]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Docket No. C-3716]


Phaseout of America, Inc., et al.; Prohibited Trade Practices, 
and Affirmative Corrective Actions

AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.

ACTION: Consent order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In settlement of alleged violations of federal law prohibiting 
unfair or deceptive acts or practices and unfair methods of 
competition, this consent order requires, among other things, the New 
York-based firms to send a postcard to identifiable past purchasers of 
PhaseOut, a purported stop-smoking device, notifying them of the 
Commission's action. The order also requires the respondents to have 
scientific substantiation for claims that PhaseOut or any other 
smoking-cessation product reduces the amount of nicotine, tar, and 
carbon monoxide smokers receive. In addition, the consent order 
prohibits the respondents' misrepresentations concerning any test, 
study or endorsement.

DATES: Complaint and Order issued February 12, 1997.\1\

    \1\ Copies of the Complaint and the Decision and Order are 
available from the Commission's Public Reference Branch, H-130, 6th 
Street and Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20580.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Shira Modell, FTC/S-4002, Washington, DC 20580, (202) 326-3116.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On Thursday, December 5, 1996, there was 
published in the Federal Register, 61 FR 64526, a proposed consent 
agreement with analysis In the Matter of PhaseOut of America, Inc., et 
al., for the purpose of soliciting public comment. Interested parties 
were given sixty (60) days in which to submit comments, suggestions or 
objections regarding the proposed form of the order.
    No comments having been received, the Commission has ordered the 
issuance of the complaint in the form contemplated by the agreement, 
made its jurisdictional findings and entered an order to cease and 
desist, as set forth in the proposed consent agreement, in disposition 
of this proceeding.

(Sec. 6, 38 Stat. 721; 15 U.S.C. 46. Interprets or applies sec. 5, 
38 Stat. 719, as amended; 15 U.S.C. 45, 52)
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-9370 Filed 4-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-M
|                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                           
|View History:                                                            
|                                                                         
|Natural Gas Citygate Price in Delaware  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                         
|                                                                         
|Natural Gas Citygate Price in Delaware  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        | 4.20   | 4.04   | 3.24   | 2.60   | 2.88   | 2.82  
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 2.76   | 2.54   | 2.83   | 3.24   | 2.95   | 2.70   | 3.68   | 3.53   | 3.02   | 3.45  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 3.41   | 5.16   | 5.37   | 5.88   | 6.13   | 8.32   | 8.84   | 7.58   | 8.32   | 6.54  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 5.67   | 9.03   | 7.19   | 5.67   | 5.54   | 5.87   | 4.91   | 5.60   | 5.59   | 5.71  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 5.38   | 5.98   | 7.36   | NA     |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/28/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 7/31/2024
# C_2018033EN.01000201.xml

| 30.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 33/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 33/2

---

Notice for the attention of the persons subject to restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/72/CFSP, as amended by Decision (CFSP) 2018/141, and in Council Regulation (EU) No 101/2011, as implemented by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/137, concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Tunisia

(2018/C 33/03)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons that appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2011/72/CFSP (1), as amended by Decision (CFSP) 2018/141 (2), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 101/2011 (3), as implemented by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/137 (4).

1

2

3

4

The Council of the European Union, after having reviewed the list of designated persons, has decided that the persons that appear in the abovementioned Annexes should continue to be included in the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2011/72/CFSP and Regulation (EU) No 101/2011.

The attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated in the websites in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 101/2011, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 4 of the Regulation).

The persons concerned may submit a request to the Council before 31 October 2018, together with supporting documentation that the decision to include them on the abovementioned list should be reconsidered to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

Any observations received will be taken into account for the purpose of the Council’s next review, pursuant to Article 5 of Decision 2011/72/CFSP and Article 12(4) of Regulation (EU) No 101/2011, of the list of designated persons.

---

(1)  OJ L 28, 2.2.2011, p. 62.

1

(2)  OJ L 25, 30.1.2018, p. 38.

2

(3)  OJ L 31, 5.2.2011, p. 1.

3

(4)  OJ L 25, 30.1.2018, p. 1.

4

---
# C_2019311EN.01000201.xml

| 16.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 311/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 311/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9446 — Toyota Motor Corporation/Panasonic Corporation/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 311/03)

On 10 September 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9446. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9446. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Presidential Documents

18015

Federal Register

Vol. 62, No. 71

Monday, April 14, 1997

Title 3—

The President

Proclamation 6984 of April 9, 1997

National D.A.R.E. Day, 1997

By the President of the United States of America

A Proclamation

Today we honor Drug Abuse Resistance Education (D.A.R.E.), the largest

and most widely recognized substance abuse prevention and safety-promotion

curriculum in the Nation. First developed in 1983, D.A.R.E. has continued

to improve its methods as research findings have increased our knowledge

of effective substance abuse prevention among school-age youth. More than

70 percent of America’s school districts have adopted the program, and

over 8,000 cooperative partnerships between law enforcement agencies and

school districts now exist across the country. By virtue of D.A.R.E.’s expansive use and national impact, this acronym has achieved broad name recognition in association with substance abuse prevention, making the D.A.R.E.

officer one of the most recognizable symbols for community policing and

prevention.

Students, parents, police officers, and school administrators have long been

familiar with the benefits of the D.A.R.E. program, and research has shown

that ongoing reinforcement of drug prevention skills is critical in decreasing

the likelihood of drug use by our youth.

Today and throughout the year, let us recognize D.A.R.E. as a model of

partnership between educators, law enforcement, parents, and students, and

let us commend D.A.R.E. officers for their dedicated efforts to help educate

the children of America about the importance of remaining drug free.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, WILLIAM J. CLINTON, President of the United States

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution

and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim April 10, 1997, as National

D.A.R.E. Day. I call upon our youth, parents, and educators, and all the

people of the United States to observe this day with appropriate activities.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this ninth day of

April, in the year of our Lord nineteen hundred and ninety-seven, and

of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred

[FR Doc. 97–9699

Filed 4–11–97; 8:45 am]

Billing code 3195–01–P

and twenty-first.

œ–
# C_2021158EN.01004901.xml

| 30.4.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 158/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 158/49

---

P8_TA(2019)0364

Nomination of a member of the Court of Auditors — Viorel Ştefan

European Parliament decision of 16 April 2019 on the nomination of Viorel Ştefan as a Member of the Court of Auditors (C8-0049/2019 — 2019/0802(NLE))

(Consultation)

(2021/C 158/13)

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to Article 286(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0049/2019), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 286(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0049/2019),

| — | having regard to Rule 121 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 121 of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A8-0194/2019), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A8-0194/2019),

| A. | whereas, by letter of 14 February 2019, the Council consulted Parliament on the nomination of Viorel Ştefan as a Member of the Court of Auditors; |
| --- | --- |

A.

whereas, by letter of 14 February 2019, the Council consulted Parliament on the nomination of Viorel Ştefan as a Member of the Court of Auditors;

| B. | whereas Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control proceeded to evaluate the credentials of the nominee, in particular in view of the requirements laid down in Article 286(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

B.

whereas Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control proceeded to evaluate the credentials of the nominee, in particular in view of the requirements laid down in Article 286(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union;

| C. | whereas at its meeting of 8 April 2019 the Committee on Budgetary Control heard the Council’s nominee for membership of the Court of Auditors; |
| --- | --- |

C.

whereas at its meeting of 8 April 2019 the Committee on Budgetary Control heard the Council’s nominee for membership of the Court of Auditors;

| 1. | Delivers an unfavourable opinion on the Council’s nomination of Viorel Ştefan as a Member of the Court of Auditors; |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and, for information, to the Court of Auditors, the other institutions of the European Union and the audit institutions of the Member States. |
| --- | --- |

2.

---
# C_2021108EN.01087701.xml

| 26.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 108/877 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 108/877

---

P8_TA(2019)0319

Listing the third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders and those whose nationals are exempt from that requirement (Kosovo) ***I

European Parliament legislative resolution of 28 March 2019 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 listing the third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders and those whose nationals are exempt from that requirement (Kosovo (*1)) (COM(2016)0277 — C8-0177/2016 — 2016/0139(COD))

(Ordinary legislative procedure: first reading)

(2021/C 108/50)

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2016)0277)), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2016)0277)),

| — | having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 77(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C8-0177/2016), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 77(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C8-0177/2016),

| — | having regard to Article 294(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 294(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

| — | having regard to Rule 59 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 59 of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Foreign Affairs (A8-0261/2016), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Foreign Affairs (A8-0261/2016),

| 1. | Adopts its position at first reading, taking over the Commission proposal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it replaces, substantially amends or intends to substantially amend its proposal; |
| --- | --- |

2.

| 3. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments. |
| --- | --- |

3.

---

(*1)  This designation is without prejudice to positions on status, and is in line with UNSCR 1244/1999 and the ICJ Opinion on the Kosovo declaration of independence.

---