18360 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 72 / Tuesday, April 15, 1997 / Notices

Woodbury County

Morningside College Historic District,

Roughly bounded by Vine, Morningside,

Garretson, Peters, and S. Paxton Aves., and

Sioux Trail, Sioux City, 97000387

KANSAS

Allen County

Northrup House, 318 East St., Iola, 97000395

MICHIGAN

St. Clair County

Edison, Thomas A., Boyhood Homesite,

Address Restricted, Port Huron vicinity,

97000397

Wayne County

Park Avenue Historic District, Park Ave.,

between W. Adams Ave. and W. Fisher

Freeway, Detroit, 97000396

MISSOURI

Cole County

Haar, Herman, House, 110 Bolivar St.,

Jefferson City, 97000398

NEW HAMPSHIRE

Cheshire County

Fitzwilliam Common Historic District, jct. of

NH 119, Richmond Rd., and Templeton

Hwy., Fitzwilliam, 97000399

[FR Doc. 97–9686 Filed 4–14–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–70–P

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Office of Surface Mining Reclamation

and Enforcement

Notice of Proposed Information

Collection

AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining

Reclamation and Enforcement.

ACTION: Notice and request for

comments.

SUMMARY: In compliance with the

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the

Office of Surface Mining Reclamation

and Enforcement (OSM) is announcing

that the information collection request

for the title described below has been

forwarded to the Office of Management

and Budget (OMB) for review and

comment. The information collection

request describes the nature of the

information collection and the expected

burden and cost.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on

or before April 15, 1997, to be assured

of consideration.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

To request a copy of the information

collection request, explanatory

information and related form, contact

John A. Trelease at (202) 208–2783.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Office

of Management and Budget (OMB)

regulations at CFR 1320, which

implement provisions of the Paperwork

Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13),

require that interested members of the

public and affected agencies have an

opportunity to comment on information

collection and recordkeeping activities

(see 5 CFR 1320.8(d)). OSM has

submitted a request to OMB to renew its

approval of the collection of information

found at 30 CFR Part 795, Small

operator assistant. OSM is requesting a

3-year term of approval for this

information collection activity.

An agency may not conduct or

sponsor, and a person is not required to

respond to, a collection of information

unless it displays a currently valid OMB

control number. The OMB control

number for this collection of

information is listed in 30 CFR Part 795,

which is 1029–0061.

As required under 5 CFR 1320.8(d), a

Federal Register notice soliciting

comments on these collections of

information was published on January

17, 1997 (62 FR 2683). No comments

were received. This notice provides the

public with an additional 30 days in

which to comment on the following

information collection activity:

Title: Small Operator Assistance.

OMB Control Number: 1029–0061.

Summary: This information collection

requirement is needed to provide

assistance to qualified small mine

operator sunder section 507(c) of P.L.

96–87. The information requested will

provide the regulatory authority with

data to determine the eligibility of the

applicant and the capability and

expertise of laboratories to perform

required tasks.

Bureau Form Number: FS–6.

Frequency of Collection: On Occasion.

Description of Respondents: Small

operators and State regulatory

authorities.

Total Annual Responses: 300.

Total Annual Burden Hours: 12,140

hours.

Send comments on the need for the

collection of information for the

performance of the functions of the

agency; the accuracy of the agency’s

burden estimates; ways to enhance the

quality, utility and clarity of the

information collection; and ways to

minimize the information collection

burden on respondents, such as use of

automated means of collection of the

information, to the following address.

Please refer to the appropriate OMB

control number in all correspondence.

ADDRESSES: Office of Information and

Regulatory Affairs, Office of

Management and Budget, Attention:

Department of Interior Desk Officer, 725

17th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20503.

Dated: April 9, 1997.

Richard G. Bryson,

Acting Chief, Division of Regulatory Support.

[FR Doc. 97–9704 Filed 4–14–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–05–M

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration

Agency Information Collection

Activities: New Collection; Comment

Request

ACTION: Notice of information collection

under review; report of mail order

transactions.

Office of Management and Budget

approval is being sought for the

information collection listed below.

This proposed information collection

was previously published in the Federal

Register on February 4, 1997 at 62 FR

6012, allowing for a 60-day public

comment period.

The purpose of this notice is to allow

an additional 30 days for public

comments until May 15, 1997. This

process is published in accordance with

5 CFR 1230.10.

Written comments and/or suggestions

regarding the item(s) contained in this

notice, especially regarding the

estimated public burden and associated

response time, should be directed to the

Office of Management and Budget,

Office of Regulatory Affairs, Attention:

Department of Justice Desk Office,

Washington, DC 20530. Additionally,

comments may be submitted to OMB via

facsimile to (202) 395–7285. Comments

may also be submitted to the

Department of Justice (DOJ), Justice

Management Division, Information

Management and Security Staff,

Attention: Department Clearance

Officer, Suite 850, 1001 G Street, NW,

Washington, DC 20530. Additionally,

comments may be submitted to DOJ via

facsimile to (202) 514–1590.

Written comments and suggestions

from the public and affected agencies

concerning the proposed collection of

information should address one or more

of the following four points:

1. Evaluate whether the proposed

collection of information is necessary

for the proper performance of the

functions of the agency, including

whether the information will have

practical utility;

2. Evaluate the accuracy of the

agencies estimate of the burden of the

proposed collection of information,

including the validity of the

methodology and assumptions used;
Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 72 / Tuesday, April 15, 1997 / Notices 18361

3. Enhance the quality, utility, and

clarity of the information to be

collected; and

4. Minimize the burden of the

collection of information on those who

are to respond, including through the

use of appropriate automated,

electronic, mechanical, or other

technological collection techniques or

other forms of information technology,

e.g., permitting electronic submission of

responses.

Overview of the information

collection:

1. Type of Information Collection:

New collection.

2. Title of the Form/Collection: Report

of Mail Order Transactions.

3. Agency form number: None, if any,

and the applicable component of the

Department of Justice sponsoring the

collection: Office of Diversion Control,

Drug Enforcement Administration,

Department of Justice.

4. Affected public who will be asked

or required to respond, as well as a brief

abstract: Primary: Business or other forprofit.

‘‘The Comprehensive Methamphetamine

Control Act of 1996 (Public Law 104–237)

(MCA) amended the Controlled Substances

Act to require that each regulated person who

engages in a transaction with a non-regulated

person which involves ephedrine,

pseudoephedrine, or phenylpropanolamine

(including drug products containing these

chemicals) and uses or attempts to use the

Postal Service or any private or commercial

carrier shall, on a monthly basis, submit a

report of each such transaction conducted

during the previous month to the Attorney

General.’’

5. An estimate of the total number of

respondents and the amount of time

estimated for an average respondent to

respond: 1,500 respondents at 6 times

per year at 1 hour per response.

6. An estimate of the total public

burden (in hours) associated with the

collection: 9,000 annual burden hours.

Public comment on this proposed

information collection is strongly

encouraged.

If additional information is required

contact: Mr. Robert B. Briggs, Clearance

Officer, United States Department of

Justice, Information Management and

Security Staff, Justice Management

Division, Suite 850, Washington Center,

1001 G Street, NW, Washington, DC

20530.

Dated: April 10, 1997.

Robert B. Briggs,

Department Clearance Officer, United States

Department of Justice.

[FR Doc. 97–9702 Filed 4–14–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–09–M

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training

Administration

Notice of Determinations Regarding

Eligibility To Apply for Worker

Adjustment Assistance and NAFTA

Transitional Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the

Trade Act of 1974, as amended, the

Department of Labor herein presents

summaries of determinations regarding

eligibility to apply for trade adjustment

assistance for workers (TA–W) issued

during the period of March and April,

1997.

In order for an affirmative

determination to be made and a

certification of eligibility to apply for

worker adjustment assistance to be

issued, each of the group eligibility

requirements of Section 222 of the Act

must be met.

(1) That a significant number or proportion

of the workers in the workers’ firm, or an

appropriate subdivision thereof, have become

totally or partially separated,

(2) That sales or production, or both, of the

firm or subdivision have decreased

absolutely, and

(3) That increases of imports of articles like

or directly competitive with articles

produced by the firm or appropriate

subdivision have contributed importantly to

the separations, or threat thereof, and to the

absolute decline in sales or production.

Negative Determinations for Worker

Adjustment Assistance

In each of the following cases the

investigation revealed that criterion (3)

has not been met. A survey of customers

indicated that increased imports did not

contribute importantly to worker

separations at the firm.

TA–W–33,049; Washington Public

Power Supply System, Richland,

WA

TA–W–33,080; Kellogg Brush

Manufacturing Co., Easthampton,

MA

TA–W–33,273 & TA–W–33,274;

Consolidated Contractor/Perfection

Pad, Buffalo, NY

TA–W–33,162; Contact Technologies,

Inc., St. Marys, PA

TA–W–33,223; Camp, Inc., Jackson, MI

TA–W–33,146; Federal Mogul Corp.,

Leiters Ford, IN

TA–W–33,113; Frigidaire Home

Products, Div of White Consolidated

Industries, Greenville, MI

TA–W–33,276; Square D Co./Schneider

North America, Milwaukee WI

In the following cases, the

investigation revealed that the criteria

for eligibility have not been met for the

reasons specified.

TA–W–33,311; Pacificorp, Portland, OR

TA–W–33,069; System One Amadeus,

Miami, FL

TA–W–33,095; General Electric Co.,

Pittsfield, MA PA

TA–W–33,197; Mason Distributors, Inc.,

Hasbrouch Heights, NJ

TA–W–33,127; Character

Suburbanwear, Inc., New York, NY

TA–W–33,058; Texaco Trading and

Transporation, Inc., Cheyenne, WY

& Operating in Various Other

Locations: A; Gillette, WY, B;

Casper, WY, C; Sidney, MT, D;

Healdton, OK, E; Ness City, KS, F;

Booker, TX

TA–W–33,312; Boise Cascade Corp.,

Portland, OR

The workers firm does not produce an

article as required for certification under

Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974.

TA–W–33,251; Allied Signal Laminate

Systems, Electronic Materials,

Lacrosse, WI

Layoffs were caused by transferring

production of the subject plant to other

domestic facilities of Allied Signal.

TA–W–33,317; Vanguard Plastic, Inc.,

Paterson, NJ

Declines in employment at the subject

plant are related to the company shifting

their production of plastic containers to

another domestic location in Allentown,

PA.

TA–W–33,229; Avesta Sheffield East,

Inc., Baltimore, MD

TA–W–33,335; 76 Products Co.

Headquartered in Costa Mesa, CA &

Operating at Various Locations in

The State of California

The investigation revealed that

criteria (2) and criteria (3) have not been

met. Sales or production did not decline

during the relevant period as required

for certification. Increases of imports of

articles like or directly competitive with

articles produced by the firm or

appropriate subdivision have not

contributed importantly to the

separations or threat thereof, and the

absolute decline in sales or production.

TA–W–33,232; Springfield Forest

Products, Springfield, OR

Sales and production declines at the

subject firm were due to a fire at the saw

mill in August 1996.

TA–W–33,112; Hecla Mining Co.,

Grouse Creek Mine, Challis, ID

The US is a net exporter of gold, not

a net importer. The US is currently the

second largest producer of gold in the

world.

TA–W–33,209; Parker Abex NML

Aerospace, Kalamazoo, MI

Worker layoffs are associated with the

transfer of production from Kalamazoo,

MI to other plants located domestically.