T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T R I C K Y W I S N U S U L I S T I O ; e t a l., P et i t i o n ers, v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 09- 73846 A ge nc yN os . A 096- 499- 641

A 096- 499- 642 A 096- 499- 643 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d June 26, 2012 ** B efo re: S C H R O E D E R , H A W K IN S , an dG O U L D , C i rcu i tJu d g es. R i cky W i snu S ul i st i o and hi s f am i l y, nat i ves and ci t i ze ns of Indo nesi a, p e titio n f o rr e v ie w o f

th e B o a r do f

I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls ’ o r d e rd is m is s in g th e ir ap p e a l f r o m a n i mmi g r a t i o n j u d g e ’ s d e c i s i o n d e n y i n g th e i rap p l i c a t i o n f o ra s y l u m, w i thh ol di ng of re m ov al , and p rot ec t i on un der the C on vent i on A gai nstT orture 

# FI LED JU L 06 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS2

(“C A T ”) . W e h av e ju risd icti o n u n d er8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e r ev iew th e a g en cy ’s f a c tu a l f in d in g s f o rs u b s ta n tia l e v id e n c e . W akkaryv. H

older , 558 F . 3d 1049, 1056 ( 9th C i r . 2009) . W e de nyi n pa rta nd gr anti n pa rtthe pe t i t i on f orr e vi e w , a nd rem an dfo r fu rth er p ro ceed i n g s. T he re cord do es no tcom pel the concl usi on thatpet i t i on er s e st abl i shed c h a n g e dc ir c u m s ta n c e s to e x c u s e th e iru n tim e lya s y lu m ap p lic a tio n . See 8 C. F. R. § 1 2 0 8 .4 ( a ) ( 4 ) ; R am adan v. G on zales , 47 9 F . 3d 64 6, 65 6-65 8 (9th C i r. 20 07 ) ( per cu ri am ). A cco rd i n g l y, p et i t i o n ers’ asyl u m cl ai m fai l s. S u b st an t i al ev i d en ce su p p o rt s th e ag en cy’ s d en i al o f C A T rel i ef b ecau se pe t i t i one r s f

a i l e d t o s how i ti s m or e l i ke l ytha n notthe yw i l l be t ortur e d w i th the consentor ac qu i es ce nce of the go vernm enti f r eturned t o Ind on es i a. See W a kka ry , 5 5 8 F . 3 dat1 0 6 7 -6 8 . A cco rd i n g l y, p et i t i o n ers’ C A T cl ai m fai l s. W i th r e s pe c tt o w i thhol di ng of r e m ova l , how e ve r , the r e c or d c om pe l s the concl usi on thatthe S ul i st i os suff er ed pastpers ec ut i on base d o n thei r e xp er i ence du r i n g th e 1 9 9 9 r i o ti n T e rn a t e , wh e n th e yh a dt o e v a c u a t e th e i rh o m e a n dt o wn b e c au s e M u s lim a tta c k e r s w e r e k illin g a ll C h r is tia n s th e yc o u ldf in d . Se e Kn ez e v ic v . A s h c r o

ft , 3 6 7 F . 3 d1 2 0 6 , 1 2 1 1 -1 2 (9 th C i r. 2 0 0 4 ) (fi n d i n g p ast pers ec ut i on w here pet i t i on er s w er e f orce d t o “ fl ee [] fr om ho st i l e f orce s m ot i vat ed byade s i r e t o ki l l e a c h a nd e ve rym e m be rof [ a ] gr oup” ) . B e c aus e the S ul i s t i os3

es t abl i shed pastpers ec ut i on , they are ent i t l ed t o a pres um pt i on of a c l ear p r o b ab i l i tyo f

f u tu r e p e r s e c u t i o n . 8 C . F . R . § 1 2 0 8 . 1 6 ( b ) ( 1 ) ( i ) . Ac c o r d i n g l y , we re m and for the agency t o d ec i de i n the fi rs ti nst ance w hether the go vernm enthas m e t its b u r d e n to r e b u t th is p r e s u m p tio n . See IN S v. V en tu ra , 537 U . S . 12, 16- 18 (200 2) (percuri am ). E a c h p a rtys h a l l b e a ri t s o wn c o s t s f o rth i s p e t i t i o n f

o rr e v i e w. P E T IT IO N F O R R E V IE W D E N IE D i n p art; G R A N T E D i n p art; RE MAND E D.