alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 53 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 53

    Authorizing a plaque commemorating the role of enslaved African-
             Americans in the construction of the Capitol.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 24, 2009

Mrs. Lincoln (for herself, Mr. Schumer, Mr. Chambliss, and Mr. Bennett) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                      on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Authorizing a plaque commemorating the role of enslaved African-
             Americans in the construction of the Capitol.

Whereas enslaved African-Americans provided labor essential to the construction 
        of the Capitol;
Whereas enslaved African-Americans performed the backbreaking work of quarrying 
        the stone which comprised many of the floors, walls, and columns of the 
        Capitol;
Whereas enslaved African-Americans toiled in the Aquia Creek sandstone quarry in 
        Stafford County, Virginia and in a marble quarry in Montgomery County, 
        Maryland to produce the stone that would be used in the Capitol;
Whereas the marble columns in the Old Senate Chamber and the sandstone walls of 
        the East Front corridor remain as the lasting legacies of the enslaved 
        African-Americans who worked the quarries;
Whereas enslaved African-Americans also participated in other facets of 
        construction of the Capitol, including carpentry, masonry, carting, 
        rafting, roofing, plastering, glazing, painting, and sawing;
Whereas enslaved African-Americans labored on the Nation's Capitol while they, 
        themselves, were not free;
Whereas the contributions of enslaved African-Americans in the construction of 
        the Capitol have not been acknowledged nor adequately represented in the 
        Capitol;
Whereas no narrative on the construction of the Capitol that does not include 
        the contributions of enslaved African-Americans can fully and accurately 
        reflect the history of the Capitol; and
Whereas recognition of the contributions of enslaved African-Americans brings to 
        all people of the United States an understanding of the continuing 
        evolution of democracy: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate authorizes and directs--
            (1) the Senate Commission on Art to procure an appropriate 
        plaque acknowledging the role of enslaved African-Americans in 
        the construction of the Capitol; and
            (2) that, under the direction of the Committee on Rules and 
        Administration of the Senate, the plaque shall be placed near 
        the original exterior wall that was constructed between 1793 
        and 1800 in the East Front corridor on the third floor of the 
        Senate wing of the Capitol.
                                 <all>
```
#### COM. v. TILLMAN, E.

2075 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/07/2017

CP-46-CR-0004427-2014, (Montgomery)

Affirmed — Application to Withdraw as Counsel Granted
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 75 (Friday, April 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 19124]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-9990]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Mental Health; Request for Public 
Commentary to National Advisory Mental Health Council Workgroup on 
Mental Disorders Prevention Research

    Notice is hereby given that the National Advisory Mental Health 
Council (NAMHC) Workgroup on Mental Disorders Prevention Research (the 
Workgroup) is seeking public testimony from individuals and 
organizations regarding critical issues germane to research on the 
prevention of mental disorders. That testimony will be used by members 
of the Workgroup, an ad hoc group of consultants to the NAMHC, as they 
develop recommendations to that advisory body and ultimately the 
Director of NIMH. Their recommendations will identify important 
research opportunities and suggest proprieties for developing the 
future NIMH prevention research portfolio.
    All testimony must be faxed to Ann Rosenfeld (301-443-2578), the 
Workgroup's Executive Secretary, no later than 5:00 p.m. (EST) on April 
30, 1997. Testimony must be typed, and should not exceed three pages. 
An additional page should contain the name, address, and phone number 
of the individual or sponsoring organization submitting the statement, 
as well as a paragraph describing the sponsoring organization (if any).

    Dated: April 11, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-9990 Filed 4-17-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Ron E. Hooper, certify that
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Marine PetroleumTrust for which Bank of America, N.A. acts as Trustee; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s Principal Accounting Officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand we have:
 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s Principal Accounting Officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.        Date: May 14, 2004 /s/ RON E. HOOPER   Ron E. Hooper   Senior Vice President Royalty Management onbehalf of Bank of America Private Bank, not inits individual capacity but solely as the trusteeof Marine Petroleum Trust
#### Renee HUGGINS, Petitioner v. UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION BOARD OF REVIEW, Respondent

No. 281 EAL 2017

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

November 28, 2017

*217ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 28th day of November, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED. Petitioner’s Petition to Consolidate is GRANTED.
#### State v. Lewis

107,308

08/19/13

Denied. .

Unpublished
Exhibit 99.1

                         ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE


                      OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE OF THE SERVICER

In compliance with Section 4.04 (g) of the Indenture of Trust by and between
Nelnet Student Loan Trust 2003-2 and Zions First National Bank, as Trustee,
dated as of July 1, 2003, I, Terry J. Heimes, certify that:

     1.   A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
          calendar year and of its performance under the Master Servicing
          Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

     2.   Based on my knowledge of such review, the Master Servicer has
          fulfilled all its obligations under the Master Servicing Agreement
          throughout such year.

March 20, 2006




By:     /s/ Terry J. Heimes
        --------------------------------
        Terry J. Heimes
        Chief Financial Officer,
        Treasurer,
        NELN, Inc. (f.k.a Nelnet, Inc.)
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                       OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Longview Fibre Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-Q"), I,
R. H. Wollenberg, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section
         13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
         or 78o(d)); and

(2)      The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
         of the Company.

Dated:  September 12, 2003


R. H. WOLLENBERG
R. H. WOLLENBERG
President and Chief Executive Officer
#### State v. Hunter

109,078

10/28/2015

Granted in part; sentence vacated; remanded to Dist. Ct.

Unpublished
No. 12-6155.

#### Wiggins *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 74 (Thursday, April 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 18771]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-9935]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-1163-DR]


Kentucky; Amendment to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
Commonwealth of Kentucky, (FEMA-1163-DR), dated March 4, 1997, and 
related determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 7, 1997

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3260.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster for the 
Commonwealth of Kentucky, is hereby amended to include the following 
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of March 4, 1997:

    The counties of Adair and Metcalfe for Individual Assistance, 
Public Assistance and Hazard Mitigation.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 83.516, Disaster 
Assistance.)
Dennis H. Kwiatkowski,
Deputy Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 97-9935 Filed 4-16-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM PART I OF THIS FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   88,957
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,100
<INVENTORY>                                     73,923
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               169,654
<PP&E>                                       1,859,920
<DEPRECIATION>                                 901,618
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,197,409
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           94,980
<BONDS>                                        520,900
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        77,515
<OTHER-SE>                                     339,207
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,197,409
<SALES>                                        547,342
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               547,342
<CGS>                                          461,590
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  461,590
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              28,718
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,659
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,684
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,975
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,975
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.15


</TABLE>
No. 12-5626.

#### Bobo *v.*Tulare Co. et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-6634

RICHARD MANIGAULT, 

Plaintiff - Appellant, 

v. 

ALBERT HOUSEY, Lieutenant, 

Defendant - Appellee, 

and 

RYAN GRANT, Corporal; DUSTIN CROSBY, Officer; GARY EICHELBERGER, 

Major; VALERIE JACKSON, Captain/Disciplinary Hearing Officer; LEVERN 

COHEN, Warden, 

Defendants. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock 

Hill. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (0:15-cv-04647-JFA) 

Submitted: March 15, 2018 Decided: March 30, 2018

Before MOTZ, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed and remanded with instructions by unpublished per curiam opinion. 
2

Richard Manigault, Appellant Pro Se. Otto Edworth Liipfert, III, GRIFFITH, FREEMAN 

& LIIPFERT, LLC, Beaufort, South Carolina, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
3

PER CURIAM: 

Richard Manigault seeks to appeal the district court’s judgment entered in his 

42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action. The judgment was entered in accordance with the 

jury’s verdict in favor of Defendant Housey following a trial, the district court’s March 24, 

2017, order granting summary judgment in favor of Defendants Grant and Crobsy, and the 

district court’s March 1, 2016, order dismissing the action without prejudice as against 

Defendants Eichelberger, Jackson, and Cohen for failure to state a cognizable claim against 

them. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and 

certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen 

v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545–47 (1949). 

“An order dismissing a complaint without prejudice is not an appealable final order 

under § 1291 if the plaintiff could save his action by merely amending his complaint.”

Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc’y, Inc., 807 F.3d 619, 623 (4th Cir. 2015) (internal 

quotation marks omitted). Where the district court dismisses an action for failure to plead 

sufficient facts in the complaint, we lack appellate jurisdiction because the plaintiff could 

amend the complaint to cure the pleading deficiency. Id. at 623–25. 

The judgment Manigault seeks to appeal is neither a final judgment nor an 

appealable interlocutory or collateral judgment. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal and 

remand the case to the district court with instructions to allow Manigault leave to amend 

his complaint as against Defendants Eichelberger, Jackson, and Cohen. We deny 

Manigault’s motions to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts 
4

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in (i) the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-145754) of Crystal River Capital, Inc. and
in the related Prospectus, (ii) the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-144141) pertaining to the Crystal River Capital, Inc. 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan and
(iii) the Registration Statement (Form S-11/A No. 333-130257) pertaining to the registration of 17,400,000 shares of Common Stock, of our reports dated March 12, 2008, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of Crystal River Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Crystal River
Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2007.

/s/
Ernst & Young LLP

New
York, NY
March 12, 2008

---



QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 73 (Thursday, April 16, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 18964]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10072]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Route Structures Over the Grand Canyon National Park (GCNP); 
Meeting

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Park Service (NPS) and Federal Aviation 
Administration (FAA) announce that a meeting of interested parties will 
take place on April 28-29 in Flagstaff, Arizona to discuss route 
structures over the Grand Canyon National Park (GCNP). This meeting 
will be open to the public. This notice serves to inform the public of 
the meeting dates.

DATES AND LOCATIONS: Interested parties will meet on April 28, 1998, 
beginning at 10 a.m., in conference rooms in the LaQuinta Inn and 
Suites, 2015 South Beulah, Flagstaff, Arizona, telephone: (520) 556-
8666. The starting time for the meeting on April 29 will be announced 
at the April 28 meeting.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Carla Mattix, Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of the Interior, 
1849 C St., NW, Washington, DC 20240, telephone: (202) 208-7957, or 
Linda Williams, Office of Rulemaking, Federal Aviation Administration, 
800 Independence Ave., Washington, DC 20591, telephone: (202) 267-9685.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The purpose of the Flagstaff meeting is to discuss the commercial 
air tour route structure for GCNP and provide a forum for interested 
parties to consider a tentative route through the Sanup Flight-free 
Zone that has been identified by NPS as a viable air tour route.
    The FAA is requesting by letter, the attendance of designated 
representatives of various groups, including air tour operators, local 
government, Native Americans, and environmentalists. Each group's 
designated representative will be asked to sit on a panel to discuss 
the proposed route structures.

Meeting Protocol

    The April 28-29 meeting will be open to the public. However, the 
following rules apply:
    Only designated representatives will be seated on the panel, and be 
allowed to participate in the discussion. However, any representative 
may call upon another individual to elaborate on a relevant point, and 
the NPS and FAA advisors to the panel have the full right to the floor 
and may raise and address appropriate points. Any other person 
attending the meeting may address the panel if time permits and may 
file statements with the panel for its consideration.

    Issued in Washington, DC on April 10, 1998.
Joseph A. Hawkins,
Director Office of Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 98-10072 Filed 4-15-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
# C_2019020EN.01000102.xml

| 16.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 20/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 20/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9156 — CMI/Hachette Filipacchi/Lagardère Publicité/Lagardère Digital France)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 20/02)

On 30 November 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9156. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9156. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 2, 2018

s0924 

# Order

Clerk October 2, 2018

156260 & (13)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 156260

COA: 336753

Grand Traverse CC:

14

- 011774

- FH

ROBERT LEEALLEN CALDWELL

, Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 7 , 2017 order of

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to

meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The mo tion to

remand is DENIED.