alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                   
|View History:                                                    
|                                                                 
|New York Natural Gas Industrial Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                 
|                                                                 
|New York Natural Gas Industrial Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------- | ------- | -------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 205,746 | 172,043 | 101,564
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 96,508 | 84,411 | 92,249 | 82,429 | 78,289 | 80,682 | 77,827 | 77,273  | 79,966  | 72,166 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 75,475 | 75,162 | 74,133 | 79,776 | 84,255 | 83,058 | 80,850 | 82,848  | 91,430  | 90,330 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 86,401 | 89,731 | 88,541 | 84,348 |        |        |        |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
S95A0022.

#### ARMSTRONG v. MILES.

(455 SE2d 587)

Per curiam.

In *Rebich v. Miles,*264 Ga. 467 (448 SE2d 192) (1994), this Court held that the discretionary application procedures must be followed to appeal an order of the superior court ruling on a challenge to a decision of a state administrative agency, such as the decision of the Department of Public Safety to suspend a driver’s license and to deny a hearing on the suspension, because the underlying subject matter generally controls over the relief sought in determining the proper appellate procedure. Although in *Rebich*the petition filed in superior court sought a writ of mandamus, whereas the petition in this case sought a writ of habeas corpus, the cases are otherwise identical and the principle in *Rebich*applies to Armstrong. Accordingly, “[b]ecause *345the review of the department’s action must come by discretionary application and [Armstrong] failed to file an application, we are without jurisdiction to hear the merits of [her] appeal.” Id. at 469.

Decided April 10, 1995.

*Spruell & Dubuc, Brian M. Dubuc,*for appellant.

*Michael J. Bowers, Attorney General, Daryl A. Robinson, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Neal B. Childers, Assistant Attorney General,*for appellee.

*Appeal dismissed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 554 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 554

 Designating July 24, 2010, as ``National Day of the American Cowboy''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 16, 2010

  Mr. Enzi (for himself, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. Baucus, Mr. Bingaman, Mr. 
Conrad, Mr. Crapo, Mr. Johanns, Mr. Johnson, Mr. Reid, and Mr. Roberts) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                            on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Designating July 24, 2010, as ``National Day of the American Cowboy''.

Whereas pioneering men and women, recognized as ``cowboys'', helped establish 
        the American West;
Whereas the cowboy embodies honesty, integrity, courage, compassion, respect, a 
        strong work ethic, and patriotism;
Whereas the cowboy spirit exemplifies strength of character, sound family 
        values, and good common sense;
Whereas the cowboy archetype transcends ethnicity, gender, geographic 
        boundaries, and political affiliations;
Whereas the cowboy is an excellent steward of the land and its creatures, who 
        lives off the land and works to protect and enhance the environment;
Whereas cowboy traditions have been a part of American culture for generations;
Whereas the cowboy continues to be an important part of the economy through the 
        work of many thousands of ranchers across the Nation who contribute to 
        the economic well-being of every State;
Whereas millions of fans watch professional and working ranch rodeo events 
        annually, and rodeo is one of the most-watched sports in the Nation;
Whereas membership and participation in rodeo and other organizations that 
        promote and encompass the livelihood of cowboys span every generation 
        and transcend race and gender;
Whereas the cowboy is a central figure in literature, film, and music and 
        occupies a central place in the public imagination;
Whereas the cowboy is an American icon; and
Whereas the ongoing contributions made by cowboys and cowgirls to their 
        communities should be recognized and encouraged: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates July 24, 2010, as ``National Day of the 
        American Cowboy''; and
            (2) encourages the people of the United States to observe 
        the day with appropriate ceremonies and activities.
                                 <all>
```
No. 11-1351.

#### Levin *v.*United States et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 567 U. S. 968.] Motion of the Court-appointed *amicus curiae*in support of petitioner to dispense with printing joint appendix granted.
Exhibit 32.2


                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
         18 U.S.C. SECTION. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection with the  filing  of the Annual Report on Form  10-K
for  the  fiscal  year  ended  December 31, 2010  (the  Report)  by
Seaboard Corporation (the Company), the  undersigned, as  the Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby  certifies  pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

  -  The  Report fully complies  with  the  requirements of Section
     13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
     and

  -  The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in
     all material respects, the  financial condition and results of
     operations of the Company.

Date: March 9, 2011

                               /s/ Robert L. Steer
                               Robert L. Steer, Senior Vice President,
                               Chief Financial Officer

<PAGE>
#### State v. Lee

111,182

07/24/2015

Denied

Unpublished
**EXHIBIT      32**

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**(SUBSECTIONS      (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF**

**TITLE      18, UNITED STATES CODE)**

|                                         | **Longfoot              Communications Corp.** |                                                            |
|----------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                         |                                           |                                                            |   |
| Dated: November                21, 2007 |                                           | /s/ Arthur              Lyons                              |   |
|                                         |                                           | Arthur              Lyons                                       |   |
|                                         |                                           | President              and              Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                                         |                                           |                                                            |   |
|                                         |                                           |                                                            |   |
|                                         |                                           | /s/              Jack Brehm                                     |   |
|                                         |                                           | Jack              Brehm                                         |   |
|                                         |                                           | Chief              Financial Officer                            |   |
|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                       
|View History:                                                        
|                                                                     
|Idaho Natural Gas Industrial Price  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                     
|                                                                     
|Idaho Natural Gas Industrial Price  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                     

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 2.76   | 3.09   | 3.29  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 4.02   | 6.43   | 6.90   | 5.90   | 6.97   | 8.39   | 10.05  | 9.39   | 9.18   | 8.53  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 6.39   | 6.36   | 5.73   | 5.47   | 5.96   | 5.72   | 5.19   | 4.44   | 3.98   | 3.60  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 3.67   | 3.88   | 5.06   | 6.65   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### State v. Hass

107,690

08/19/13

Denied.

Unpublished
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 32

THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT IS BEING MADE TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSES OF SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18
U.S.C. 1350), WHICH CARRIES WITH IT CERTAIN CRIMINAL PENALTIES IN THE EVENT OF A
KNOWING OR WILLFUL MISREPRESENTATION.

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street NW
Washington, DC 20549

     Re:  Perrigo Company

Ladies and Gentlemen:

     In accordance with the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (18 USC 1350), each of the undersigned hereby certifies that:

     (i)  this Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
          78o(d)); and

     (ii) the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of Perrigo Company.

Dated as of this 1st day of November, 2007.


/s/ Joseph C. Papa                      /s/ Judy L. Brown
-------------------------------------   ----------------------------------------
Joseph C. Papa                          Judy L. Brown
President and                           Executive Vice President and
Chief Executive Officer                 Chief Financial Officer
RONNIE DAVENPORT,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-2570

_____________________________/

Opinion filed November 3, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Darlene Dickey, Judge.

Ronnie Davenport, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, ROWE, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 21

- 00171

- CR

C HARLES R AY G ARY

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ On App ea l from the 271st District Court

of Wise County ( CR22323 )

April 6, 2023

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Kerr

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. I t is ordered that the trial court ’ s judgment

is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By __ /s/ Elizabeth Kerr

_________________ Justice Elizabeth Kerr
|                                                                             
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                               
|View History:                                                                
|                                                                             
|Natural Gas Citygate Price in Rhode Island  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                             
|                                                                             
|Natural Gas Citygate Price in Rhode Island  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        | 4.23   | 4.32   | 3.86   | 3.16   | 3.43   | 3.68  
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 3.71   | 3.68   | 3.82   | 4.41   | 4.17   | 3.57   | 4.41   | 4.49   | 3.78   | 4.19  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 4.36   | 6.40   | 5.01   | 7.00   | 7.33   | 8.69   | 9.96   | 10.62  | 10.07  | 6.70  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 10.05  | 8.22   | 4.11   | 4.01   | 4.03   | 3.14   | 2.12   | 2.22   | 2.37   | 2.49  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2.59   | 2.23   | 7.71   | 8.82   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
#### State v. Evarts

107,730

10/30/13

Denied. ...

Unpublished
<Page>

FORM N-CSR ITEM 10(c) EXHIBIT


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            The undersigned hereby certify in their capacity as Treasurer and
President, respectively, of Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust (the "Trust"), that:

   (a)   the Semi-Annual Report of the Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust on Form
         N-CSR for the period ended April 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies
         with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
         Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

   (b)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and the results of
         operations of the Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust for such period.

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN
PROVIDED TO THE EATON VANCE MUTUAL FUNDS TRUST AND WILL BE RETAINED BY THE EATON
VANCE MUTUAL FUNDS TRUST AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.

Date: June 18, 2003

/s/ James L. O'Connor
------------------------
James L. O'Connor
Treasurer

Date: June 18, 2003

/s/ Thomas E. Faust Jr.
------------------------
Thomas E. Faust Jr.
President
Exhibit 13.1


CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350








In connection with this Annual Report of Aegean Marine Petroleum Network Inc. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, E. Nikolas Tavlarios, President and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.





Date: April 6, 2011








/s/ E. Nikolas Tavlarios


E. Nikolas Tavlarios


President (Principal Executive Officer)
No. 11-6217.

#### Sisolak *v.*California.

Ct. App. Cal., 4th App. Dist., Div. 3. Certiorari denied.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2019245EN.01000701.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 22.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 245/7 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9332 — Ericsson/Kathrein Antenna and Filter Assets)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 245/06)

1.

On 15 July 2019, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 and following a referral pursuant to Article 4(5) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2019245EN.01000701-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) including its subsidiaries (‘Ericsson’, Sweden), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Kathrein SE including its subsidiaries (‘Kathrein Group’, Germany). |

Ericsson acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of parts of Kathrein Group. The proposed concentration only concerns Kathrein Group’s business in passive antennas and filters as components for mobile network equipment.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of assets.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for Ericsson: a provider of network equipment and software, as well as services for network and business operations,

—   for Kathrein Group: a provider of communication technologies solutions.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9332 — Ericsson/Kathrein Antenna and Filter Assets

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2019245EN.01000701-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

---