alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
> ^ UNITED STATE S DEPARTMEN T O F TRANSPORTATIO N FEDERA L AVIATIO N ADMINISTRATIO N

WASfflNGTON , D C Delbert Johnso n d/b/ aTw o Dog s Aviatio n

Complainant , V . Goldsbor o Wayn e Airpor t Authorit y Respondent . FA A Docke t No . 16-08-1 1

-T 3 C D

~ ; 1 REQUES T FO RADDITIONAL INFORMATIO N AN D NOTIC E O F EXTENSIO N O F TIM E C D Pursuan t to 1 4 CF R§ 16.29(b)(1) , th e Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n (FAA) ha s determined tha t th e pleading s in thi s matte

r nee d t o b e supplemente d b y limited , additiona l information frombot h parties . Eac

h part y i s requeste d t o full

y answe r th e following question s within 3 0 day s fromth e dat

e of issiianc e of

thi s request . Questio n fo

r th e Complainan

t 1 - Whic h section s of

th e Airport' s Minimu

mStandard s d

o you believ e shoul d b e waive d fo r you r self-servic e fuelin

g proposal ? Question s fo

r th e Responden

t 1

- Wha t i s th e nex t ste p th e Complainan

t mus t tak e i n orde r fo r th e Authorit

y to act o n th e Complainant' s propose d sit e fo r hi s self-servic e fuelin

g facility ? 2

- Whic h sections , i f

any , of th e Airport' s Minimu

mStandard s i s th e Authorit y prepare d to waiv e fo

r th e Complainant ? 3

- Ar e an y tenant s o n th e Airpor

t currently self-fueling ? If

so , unde r wha t standard ? Th e partie s to th e Complain

t shoul d no t

conside r tha t thes e question s necessarily represent all of th e FAA' s concern s regardin g th e issue s raise d in thi s matter . Furthermore , th e partie s should no t assum e tha t th e sponsor' s complianc e statu s would turn , necessarily , on an y on e answe r t o aquestion . Based o n the above and pursuan

t to 1 4 CF R§ 16.11(a) , th e Dh-ecto

r doe s hereb y extend th e dat e tha t th e Director' s initia

l determinatio n wil l b e rendere d i n th e above-referenced cas e toJul

y 31,2009 . A

n extension of

time i s necessar

y becaus e th e Agency ha s requeste d additiona l information it

believe s i s essentia

l fo r afai r an d complet e hearin g o f

th e matter .

Dat e Directo r of Offic e o f Airpor t Complianc e an d Fiel d Operation s 

### Mf ^ I I f J ?.r)o< ^CERTIFICAT E O F SERVIC E

I HEREB Y CERTIF Y tha t o n May 19,2009, 1 cause d t o b e place d i n th e Unite d State s mai l (firs t

clas s mail , postag e paid ) atru e cop y o f th e foregoin g documen t

addresse d to : Glen n A . Barfiel d Pos t Offic e Drawe r

7 Goldsboro , N C 27533-000 7 (919)735-642 0

Counse l for

Complainan t W . Harrel l Everett , Jr . Everett , Womble , Lawrenc e & Brown , LL P 50 7 B Nort h Spenc e Avenu e Goldsboro , N C 2753 2 (919)778-670 7 Pabl o O . Niiesc h Elain e C . Lippman n Spiege l & McDiarmid , LL P 133 3 Ne w Hampshir e Ave. , N W Washington , D C 2000 5

Counse l for

Responden t Han d Delivere d to : Part 1 6 Airpor t

Proceeding s Docke t

Sharo n Lon g Airport s La w Branc h Offic e o f th e Chie f Counse l
#### State v. Wycoff

106,221

10/01/13

Denied.

Unpublished
|                                                                       
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                         
|View History:                                                          
|                                                                       
|North Carolina Natural Gas Industrial Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                       
|                                                                       
|North Carolina Natural Gas Industrial Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |         | 111,513 | 106,497 | 107,284
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 106,547 | 88,844  | 98,306  | 88,445  | 90,133  | 86,821  | 87,150  | 88,401  | 89,317  | 82,253 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 92,321  | 99,110  | 102,151 | 109,662 | 107,904 | 105,103 | 105,504 | 107,373 | 116,776 | 119,114
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 115,346 | 122,230 | 122,860 | 117,882 |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk March 8, 2013

s0305 

# Order

March 8, 2013

146644

SC: 146644

In re NABERS/REED, Minors

. COA: 308818

Oakland CC Family Division:

2007

- 739244

- NA

_______________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 10, 2013

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

V IVIANO

, J., not participating.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the balance
sheet as of December 31, 1999, and statements of operations for the six months
ended December 31, 1999, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           6,443
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,066
<PP&E>                                         225,014
<DEPRECIATION>                               (164,561)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,102,651
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          170,721
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    292,786
<COMMON>                                     5,839,911
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,102,651
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               319,641
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 421
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (320,062)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (320,062)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (320,062)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.02)


</TABLE>
# Table 10.7

# RSE 10.7

# Microsoft_Word_Document1.docx

# image1.emf

# Microsoft_Word_Document2.docx

# image2.emf
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
Due to format constraints of this Financial Data Schedule (FDS) certain
Balance Sheet items were omitted: i.e. Prepaid reinsurance premiums,
Premium notes receivable, Installment premiums receivable, Excess of cost
over net assets acquired and Other assets.  Refer to actual 10QSB submis-
sion.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> $
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                                 0
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                        4,246,047
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                         11,322,544
<EQUITIES>                                     152,169
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                              11,518,542
<CASH>                                       4,217,977
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                          15,359,564
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         888,398
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              59,240,919
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                      0
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                         11,416,720
<POLICY-OTHER>                               2,177,465
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                        6,841,504
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                              8,878,573
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       328,898
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,954,490
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                59,240,919
<PREMIUMS>                                   6,605,315
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            389,599
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                   0
<OTHER-INCOME>                               2,096,654
<BENEFITS>                                   4,112,087
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    (1,784)
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                         4,318,801
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                662,464
<INCOME-TAX>                                   260,439
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            402,025
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   402,025
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04
<RESERVE-OPEN>                              17,732,289
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                         13,174,285
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                              254,783
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                         (6,381,046)
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                           (8,216,091)
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                             16,564,220
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 455 

Honoring the life, heroism, and service of Harriet Tubman. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 15, 2010 

Mrs. BOXER (for herself, Mr. BROWNBACK, Mr. SPECTER, Ms. SNOWE, Mr. 

SCHUMER, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, Ms. MIKULSKI, Mr. CARDIN, and Mr. 

LEVIN) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 

agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the life, heroism, and service of Harriet Tubman. 

Whereas Harriet Ross Tubman was born into slavery as 

Araminta Ross in Dorchester County, Maryland, in or 

around 1820; 

Whereas in 1849, Ms. Tubman bravely escaped to freedom, 

traveling alone for approximately 90 miles to Pennsylvania; 

Whereas, after escaping slavery, Ms. Tubman participated in 

the Underground Railroad, a network of routes, people, 

and houses that helped slaves escape to freedom; 

Whereas Ms. Tubman became a ‘‘conductor’’ on the Underground Railroad, courageously leading approximately 19 

expeditions to help more than 300 slaves to freedom; 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 455 ATS 

Whereas Ms. Tubman served as a spy, nurse, scout, and cook 

during the Civil War; 

Whereas during her service in the Civil War, Ms. Tubman became the first woman in the United States to plan and 

lead a military expedition, which resulted in successfully 

freeing more than 700 slaves; 

Whereas after the Civil War, Ms. Tubman continued to fight 

for justice and equality, including equal rights for African-Americans and women; 

Whereas Ms. Tubman died on March 10, 1913, in Auburn, 

New York; and 

Whereas the heroic life of Ms. Tubman continues to serve as 

an inspiration to the people of the United States: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) honors the life and courageous heroism of 

3 Harriet Tubman; 

4 (2) recognizes the great contributions made by 

5 Harriet Tubman throughout her lifelong service and 

6 commitment to liberty, justice, and equality for all; 

7 and 

8 (3) encourages the people of the United States 

9 to remember the courageous life of Harriet Tubman, 

10 a true hero. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
Order entered September 19, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-00195-CR

KEVIN DEWAYNE JOHNSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 380th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 380-81811-2015

ORDER

The Court REINSTATES the appeal.

On August 19, 2016, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why 

appellant’s brief had not been filed. We ADOPT the trial court’s findings that (1) appellant 

desires to prosecute this appeal, (2) appellant is indigent and entitled to proceed without costs, 

and (3) appellant’s court-appointed counsel can file the brief by September 26, 2016.

Accordingly, the Court ORDERS appellant to file the brief on or before September 26, 

2016.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Bridgetech Laboratories, Inc, (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Scott Landow, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, That to the best of my knowledge:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By /s/ Scott Landow


Scott Landow


Chief Financial officer


April 15, 2010
#### State v. Sisson

106,580

10/01/13

Granted.

Unpublished
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 473 

Designating April 4, 2010, as ‘‘National Association of Junior Auxiliaries 

Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 26 (legislative day, MARCH 25), 2010 

Mrs. LINCOLN (for herself and Mr. WICKER) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating April 4, 2010, as ‘‘National Association of 

Junior Auxiliaries Day’’. 

Whereas the National Association of Junior Auxiliaries and 

the members of the National Association of Junior Auxiliaries provide valuable service and leadership opportunities for women who wish to take an active role in their 

communities; 

Whereas the mission of the National Association of Junior 

Auxiliaries is to encourage member chapters to render 

charitable services that— 

(1) are beneficial to the general public; and 

(2) place a particular emphasis on providing for the 

needs of children; and 

Whereas, since the founding of the National Association of 

Junior Auxiliaries in 1941, the organization has provided 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 473 ATS 

strength and inspiration to women who want to effect 

positive change in their communities: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates April 4, 2010, as ‘‘National As3 sociation of Junior Auxiliaries Day’’; 

4 (2) recognizes the great contributions made by 

5 members of the National Association of Junior Aux6 iliaries to their communities and to the people of the 

7 United States; and 

8 (3) especially commends the work of the mem9 bers of the National Association of Junior Auxil10 iaries to better the lives of children in the United 

11 States. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 1 LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL BANK, 2 Plaintiff-Appellee, 3
v. NO. 32,036 4 SANTA FE CAPITAL 5 EQUITIES, LLC, et al., 6 Defendants-Appellants, 7 J. ALAN WREYFORD and 8 MARY WREYFORD, 9 Defendants/Cross-Defendants/Appellees, 10
v. 11 MICHAEL ORTIZ, 12 Defendant/Cross-Plaintiff/Appellant. 13 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY 14 Raymond Ortiz, District Judge 15 Jurgens & With, PA 16 James R. Jurgens 17 Santa Fe, NM 18 Joseph L. Werntz 192 Albuquerque, NM 1 for Appellee 2 Walcott & Henry, PC 3 Donald A. Walcott 4 Santa Fe, NM 5 for Appellants 6 Affordable Law, PC 7 Eric N. Ortiz 8 Albuquerque, NM 9 for Cross-Plaintiff/Appellant 10
MEMORANDUM OPINION 11 KENNEDY, Judge. 12 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 13 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has 14 been filed, and the time for doing so has expired. 15 AFFIRMED. 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. 17

_______________________________ 18 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge 193 WE CONCUR: 1

_________________________ 2 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge 3

_________________________ 4 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge 5
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

CHRISTOPHER STEWART,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-2320

[February 11, 2021]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Michael A. Usan, 

Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 12-14684CF10A, 13-5083CF10A, 13-9521CF10A 

and 13-2339CF10A.

Christopher Stewart, White City, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, CONNER and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 500 

Expressing the sincere condolences of the Senate to the family, loved ones, 

United Steelworkers, fellow workers, and the Anacortes community on 

the tragedy at the Tesoro refinery in Anacortes, Washington. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 26, 2010 

Mrs. MURRAY (for herself and Ms. CANTWELL) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sincere condolences of the Senate to the family, loved ones, United Steelworkers, fellow workers, and 

the Anacortes community on the tragedy at the Tesoro 

refinery in Anacortes, Washington. 

Whereas the State of Washington, the Tesoro Corporation, 

and the United Steelworkers experienced a tragedy on 

April 2, 2010, when a fire occurred at the Tesoro refinery in Anacortes, Washington; 

Whereas 7 workers died as a result of the tragedy: Daniel J. 

Aldridge, Matthew C. Bowen, Donna Van Dreumel, Matt 

Gumbel, Darrin J. Hoines, Lew Janz, and Kathryn Powell; 

Whereas Federal and State government agencies, including 

the Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board, the 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 500 ATS 

Environmental Protection Agency, and the Washington 

State Department of Labor and Industries, are investigating the tragedy and reviewing current safety procedures and processes to prevent future tragedies from occurring; and 

Whereas, to support the victims and the families involved in 

the tragedy, the United Steelworkers Local 12-591 has 

established the Tesoro Incident Family Fund and the 

Tesoro Corporation and the Skagit Community Foundation have partnered to establish the Tesoro Anacortes Refinery Survivors Fund: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) expresses the sincere condolences of the 

3 Senate to the family, loved ones, United Steel4 workers, fellow workers, and the Anacortes commu5 nity on the tragedy at the Tesoro refinery in 

6 Anacortes, Washington; and 

7 (2) honors Daniel J. Aldridge, Matthew C. 

8 Bowen, Donna Van Dreumel, Matt Gumbel, Darrin 

9 J. Hoines, Lew Janz, and Kathryn Powell. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
# C_2019309EN.01000402.xml

| 13.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 309/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 309/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9330 — Denso/Hirose)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 309/03)

On 20 August 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9330. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9330. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---