alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.2

                          CFO SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

                              ____________________
                         PSi TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC.

This certification is provided to PSi Technologies Holdings, Inc. (the "Issuer")
in connection with the preparation of the annual report on Form 20-F (the "Form
20-F") for the period ended December 31, 2002 of Issuer.

I, Thelma G. Oribello, the Chief Financial Officer of Issuer certify that:

     (1)  To the best of my knowledge, after reasonable investigation:

          (i)  the Form 20-F fully complies with the requirements of section
               13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
               and

          (ii) the information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in
               all material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Issuer.

     (2)  I have reviewed the contents of this certificate with the Chief
          Executive Officer of the Issuer.

Dated: June 27, 2003.

                                         /s/ Thelma G. Oribello
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Name: Thelma G. Oribello
                                         Title:   Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Tank Sports, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-KSB for the period ended February 28, 2006, as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jing Jing Long, in
      my
      capacity as Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that:





The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Date:
      May
      30, 2006


/s/
      Jing Jing Long


Jing
      Jing
      Long


Principal
      Executive Officer
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                     Exhibit No. 11
                      HARDING LAWSON ASSOCIATES GROUP, INC.

                        Computation of Per Share Earnings
                      (In thousands, except per share data)
                                   (Unaudited)


                                                                Three Months Ended       Six Months Ended
                                                                   November 30,            November 30,
                                                               1997         1996          1997         1996
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                             <C>          <C>         <C>           <C>
PRIMARY
     Average shares outstanding                                 4,971        4,980        4,974        4,933
     Net effect of dilutive stock options
         based on the treasury stock method                       162           16           56           25
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

         TOTAL                                                  5,133        4,996        5,030        4,958
============================================================================================================

     Net income                                                  $891         $750       $1,811         $976
============================================================================================================

     Net income per share                                       $0.17        $0.15        $0.36        $0.20
============================================================================================================
</TABLE>
#### State v. Jones

108,989

06/29/2015

Denied

Unpublished
No. 12-5374.

#### Campbell *v.*Robinson, Warden.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned executive officers of United Community Bancorp (the Registrant) hereby certify that this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                         |  |  |  |        |  |                                                              |  | 
|------------------------ |  |  |  | ------ |  | ------------------------------------------------------------ |  | 
|                         |  |  |  | By:    |  | /s/ William F. Ritzmann                                      |  | 
|                         |  |  |  | Name:  |  | William F. Ritzmann                                          |  | 
|                         |  |  |  | Title: |  | President and Chief Executive Officer                        |  | 
|                         |  |  |  |       
|                         |  |  |  | By:    |  | /s/ Vicki A. March                                           |  | 
|                         |  |  |  | Name:  |  | Vicki A. March                                               |  | 
|                         |  |  |  | Title: |  | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |  | 
|                         |  |  |  |       
|Date: September 26, 2007 |  |  |  |        |  |                                                              |  |
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 75 (Monday, April 20, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19474-19475]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10370]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[I.D. 040898A]


Western Pacific Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.


[[Page 19475]]


ACTION: Notice of a public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Western Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) will 
hold a meeting of its Pelagics Plan Team.

DATES: The meeting will be held on May 6-7, 1998, from 8:30 a.m. to 
5:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Council office, 1164 Bishop 
St., Suite 1400, Honolulu, HI 96814.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kitty Simonds, Executive Director; 
telephone: 808-522-8220.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Plan Team will discuss and may make 
recommendations to the Council on the following agenda items:
    Wednesday, May 6, 1998, 8.30 p.m.
    1. Introductions and assignment of rapporteurs;
    2. 1997 Pelagic fisheries annual report modules; and
    3. Comprehensive Sustainable Fisheries Act amendment (Magnuson 
Stevens Act requirement), including bycatch, fishing sectors, fishing 
communities, overfishing and essential fish habitat.
    Thursday, May 7, 1998, 8.30 p.m.
    1. Protected species and seabird interactions;
    2. Shark incidental catches in the Western Pacific;
    3. Hawaii longline/charter boat interactions;
    4. Pelagic Fishery Management Plan Amendment 8 - American Samoa 
pelagic fisheries area closure;
    5. Palmyra fishery developments update;
    6. Milestones;
    7. Summary of Plan Team recommendations;
    8. Other business as required.
    Although other issues not contained in this agenda may come before 
this Plan Team for discussion, in accordance with the Magnuson-Stevens 
Fishery Conservation and Management Act, those issues may not be the 
subject of formal action during this meeting. Action will be restricted 
to those issues specifically identified in the agenda listed in this 
notice.

Special Accommodations

    This meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Kitty M. Simonds, 808-522-8220 (voice) or 808-
522-8226 (fax), at least 5 days prior to the meeting date.

    Dated: April 14, 1998.
Bruce C. Morehead,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 98-10370 Filed 4-17-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.1    
    


 
 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS    
    


        We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-10006) and Form S-8
(No. 333-14232) of SkyePharma PLC of our report dated April 2, 2003 relating to the financial statements of SkyePharma PLC, which appears in SkyePharma PLC's Annual Report on
Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2002. 


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

London, United Kingdom

June 27, 2003 









QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.1


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 25, 2013

t0617

Order 

Clerk

June 25, 2013

146973

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146973

COA: 298372

Oakland CC: 2009-225787-FC

STEVEN MICHAEL KELSEY, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 14, 2013 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### State v. Tummons

104,101

04/08/13

Denied.

Unpublished
EXHIBIT 32.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, David K. Spohr, Vice President and Director of Fund Administration of the Managing Owner, Preferred
Investment Solutions Corp. (the Managing Owner), of World Monitor Trust III  Series I (Series I), hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| | (1) | Series Is Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Series I.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                
|/s/ David K. Spohr                                                              
|David K. Spohr Vice President and Director of Fund Administration March 31, 2006
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 66 (Monday, April 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 16642]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-8726]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

March 31, 1997.
    The Department of Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.
    Special Request: In order to conduct the focus group study 
described below in late April 1997, the Department of the Treasury is 
requesting that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) review and 
approve this information collection by April 9, 1997. To obtain a copy 
of this study, please contact the Internal Revenue Service Clearance 
Officer at the address listed below.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

    OMB Number: 1545-1432.
    Project Number: PC:V 97-008-G.
    Type of Review: Revision.
    Title: Form 1040 With Remittance Focus Group Study.
    Description: The objective of the focus group study is to gather 
information on taxpayer reactions to the different mailing concepts as 
well as information on the burden associated with each concept.
    Respondents: Individuals or households, Business or other for-
profit.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 80.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Response:

Interviews......................................................3 hours
Recruiting....................................................5 minutes

    Frequency of Response: Other.
    Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 480 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Garrick Shear (202) 622-3869, Internal Revenue 
Service, Room 5571, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 
20224.
    OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt (202) 395-7860, Office of 
Management and Budget, Room 10226, New Executive Office Building, 
Washington, DC 20503.
Lois K. Holland,
Departmental Reports Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-8726 Filed 4-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

May 25, 2010 

d0517 

Order 

 

May 25, 2010 

140326 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 140326 

 COA: 294152 

Berrien CC: 1993-003414-FH 

DWAYNE ANTHONY JOHNSON, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 9, 2009 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s 

motion for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> UT
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      292,916
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                      8,564
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          58,235
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        18,425
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                  12,960
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 391,100
<COMMON>                                        29,800
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       64,284
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             48,212
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 142,296
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           120,000
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              38,722
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                       59
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                        963
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                   620
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                  88,440
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  391,100
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                       87,994
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             9,788
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      60,600
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      70,388
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         17,606
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                (260)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  17,346
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         2,230
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,116
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   15,116
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         3,078
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        2,133
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          13,494
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.69
        

</TABLE>
Opinion filed January 7, 2010

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals

____________

No. 11-09-00357-CR

__________

 ROBERT LEN HAAS, Appellant

V.

 STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 104th District Court

 Taylor County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 16176-B

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

On December 7, 2009, Robert Len Haas filed in this court a pro se notice of appeal. In this

document, Haas stated emphatically that he was appealing from the trial court’s decision concerning

his request for “any and all trial transcripts.” The clerk of this court wrote the parties that the notice

of appeal had been filed but that it appeared Haas was attempting to perfect an appeal in a situation

where a final, appealable order had not yet been entered. Haas was directed to respond showing

grounds for continuing this appeal.
2

Haas filed in this court a response. Haas again contends that he is appealing the trial court’s

denial of his request for trial court transcriptions and records. We understand that Haas’s desire is

to secure copies of his records from trial court proceedings; however, Haas has not established that

an appealable order has been entered or that this court has jurisdiction to consider a direct appeal in

this situation.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

January 7, 2010

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Strange, J.
# table12
# T INDAL 

# L AW 

# F IRM Texas | Alabama | Florida

Troy Tindal 17225 El Camino Real, Suite 190 Tel: 832-691 -1519 troy@tindallawfirm.com Houston, Texas 77058 Fax: 832-408 -7579

March 4 , 201 5

Mr. Christopher A. Prine By Electronic Filing Clerk of the First Court of Appeals

301 Fannin Street Houston, Texas 77002-2066

Re: Appellee-Defendants ’ Report on Mediation Conducted on March 2, 2015

in Case No. 01-14 -01011-CV, Hope Therapy vs. St. Anthony ’ s Hospital et

al. , in the First Court of Appeals at Houston

Dear Mr. Prine:

As directed in the Court ’ s Memorandum Order and Referral to Mediation, issued January 21, 2015, I write on behalf of Appellee-Defendants Jason LeDay, Deric Outley, and Victoria Babineaux to report on the mediation conducted on Monday, March 2, 2015.

Mr. LeDay and I personally attended the mediation. My other clients, Deric Outley and Victoria Babineaux, each authorized Mr. LeDay to mediate and settle the case on their behalf of pre-arranged conditions. Our mediator, Mr. Dion Ramos, informed us that Ms. Woldu was present for Hope Therapy, but both sides declined an opening general session, so we never interfaced other than through caucus with Mr. Ramos.

The outcome of the mediation was that Mr. Ramos declared an impasse at 4:30 in a session that began at 1:30. We thoroughly discussed the legal issues and the risk each side faced in the appeal and potentially back in the trial court, but the values assigned to the case by each side were such that there was no possibility of an agreed resolution.

Sincerely,

/s/ Troy Tindal on Mar 4 , 201 5

Troy Tindal

Cc : Mr. Wayman Prince- via electronic filing ACCEPTED
01-14-01011-CV
FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS
3/4/2015 4:56:05 PM
CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK
OFFiCE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN

Eon. D. RiohardVo&ee countyAttorney viilson

county

Apl-1111, 1940, whemin the

M emargsncg tlcns of the 1492 emend8 lpi0 dM&3T.8 all or the Beathat It **was** 1 of Article ion, th5.c deportmat **ruled** ture, in a8mndl.u~ BeatloP 0, that 811 or the motion8 Y said elnntldment, thw making applicable to Igil8on County.
ewink: said opinion and the ORBB y%.sda Independent Sohool ISstrlat, agreewith you that we tread in

Of Article 952, Vr!rAoA’B Penal **Code,** 18 BB8- ke se&Ion of thle 8tntute, rn% upoa which em wholly dependent. Pihenthe amended Seots rightfulplace esnignedto it by ths I.&&enothing in tns hod of the eirendatory House Bill 432, 46th Legirleturq, to 8how thet other 8eCtiOIl8 Of the Act dependent on this sectionwould not.rrfmS.n dlepandent

upon the emendeta,ry ssation. Drawincffrom the lnngmga ueed in the Shipley ~~32, super

When a mh sectionhas been intmduoed into(Plaw, it n.Us'ib;:aonr-trued in vlsr! 0:'tSc origi~~al statuteas it stands attw the amen%uent 16 introducsd,and it an% hi1 trie &ectloneol th6 old law must be regt;r%ed

aa a h8nIIOniGU8 whole, all eectlons mutually ectlng upon each other."
Fe have aonoluded that theLeglslcture $6 intention sea, ae strjted

in the emergency cleuee of Howe Dill 432, 56th Legislcturs, "to pleC0 i'iilSO2 COWIt; in the 681688tetu8 86 the adjoining countlre." Elavihgreached that cons:usion,th?re is little signlfioenoetobe attached to the leug~ageor the title tc t;e bill, *To Amen% Section 1" of Article QEFz of the Penal cods 0r Tsxee,when th.3 other ?,ectione

are 80 expresel- relate% to Section 1 an% being gtrmiarie to the eubjedt of'drtio fe 952, supra, SDLQS

cm necefieary

in the maintainingof Wilson County lo equul atetuewita the a%jOiAiA& oountles.

h reference tc'en ertiole IA 8 oode, 8uckia8 the Revim% civil statutes, iii sufrioient iA the title 0r an eofi amendatory thereof to ellow any aman%mentgermane to the subject treeted in the article referred to that the n88klng or the erticle or i,~';o=~~"~~~t;~~~~~e~~~~h= attention ol the bgi8latOr8 to all of theproviaiona therein, a8 ths subject of the amending act, an% theftsuehprovisions can **be** ascertainedby rreding the srtiolss to be emended. CernOUh et ux. vs. Colorado County, 48 S. P. (2d) 47l$ Fx perte Erak, **128 9.**  **1. (2d)**  **776.**

&aviq acted upon your reque8t ror a reoenaideration of OpinionNo. O-2142,we respeotfuliyadvlre that in our opiniOA ?t iS Correct.

Yours very truly

BY (:.I vulri. J. It. KiAg bdsistant