alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
          32.1**
  **CERTIFICATION
          PURSUANT TO**
 **18
          U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
          ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
          906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
  In connection with the Annual Report of Kanai Sciences, Inc. (the "Company")
          on
          Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the
          Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
          Matthew
          H. Davis, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
          to ss.
          906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
  (1)
          The
          Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
          the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)
          The
          information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
          the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/
                    Matthew H. DavisMatthew H. Davis
                  Principal
                      Executive Officer
                    March
                        25, 2008
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19A0710. JARIUS JERMILL WARE v. THE STATE. 

In July 2017, JariusJermillWare pleaded guilty to aggravated assault and other

crimes and was sentenced to 15 years. In May 2018, Ware filed a motion to modify

his sentence. The trial court denied the motion on June 8, 2018, and Ware filed a

notice of appeal on July 12, 2018.

1

 We lack jurisdiction.

A notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of entry of the trial court order

sought to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). The proper and timely filing of a notice

of appeal is an absolute requirement to confer jurisdiction on this Court. Rowland v.

State, 264 Ga. 872, 872 (1) (452 SE2d 756) (1995). Ware’s notice of appeal is

untimely, as it was filed 34 days after entry of the trial court’s order. Consequently,

this appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

1

 Ware initially appealed to the Supreme Court, which transferred the case to

this Court. See Case No. S18A1573 (August 20, 2018). 

December 07, 2018

12/07/2018
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Norton Sound Acquisition Corp. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 as filed
      with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      J.
      Jay Lobell, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      ss.
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ J.
              Jay
              LobellJ.
                Jay Lobell
              Principal
                Executive Officer
              February
                20, 2007
**Exhibit  10.35**

Addendum

To

EmploymentAgreement

ThisAddendum is effective June 1, 2006 (“Addendum”) and modifies the EmploymentAgreement, as amended (“Agreement”) entered into effective May 4, 2004 betweenIntentia International AB, a Swedish company (now known as Lawson SoftwareInternational AB) (“Company”) and Bertrand Sciard (“Employee”).  Capitalized terms not otherwise defined inthis Addendum have the same respective meaning as defined in theAgreement.  The sections of the Agreementthat are not expressly modified by this Addendum shall remain in effectpursuant to their terms.

The Lawson Software, Inc. Executive Change in Control Severance PayPlan for Tier 1 Executives (first adopted on January 17, 2005) will apply toEmployee on and after June 1, 2006 (the “Tier 1 CIC Plan”).  As stated in the Tier 1 CIC Plan, anyseverance payments under the Tier 1 CIC Plan will be reduced by the amount ofany severance payments under this Agreement.

This Addendum may be signedin counterpart and by fax, and is effective June 1, 2006.
| Lawson Software, Inc. |                         | Lawson Software International AB |   |
|-----------------------|------------------------------|----------------------------------|--------|
|                  |                         |                             |   |   |   |
|                  |                         |                             |   |   |   |
| By                    | /s/ David R Hubers           |                             | By     |   |   |   |
|                  | David R. Hubers,             | Title                            |   |   |   |
|                  | Compensation Committee Chair |                             |   |   |
|                  |                         |                             |   |
|                  |                         |                             |   |   |
|                  | /s/ Bertrand Sciard          |                             |   |   |
|                  | Bertrand Sciard              |                             |   |   |
|                       |                              |                                  |        |  |  |  |  |  |

 

----
No. D-2678.

#### In re Disbarment of Agiliga.

[For earlier order herein, see 566 U. S. 984.]

Disbarment entered.
#### Smith v. State

103,989

05/20/13

Denied.

Unpublished
|                                                                                            
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                              
|View History:                                                                               
|                                                                                            
|Percent of Commercial Natural Gas Deliveries in Oklahoma Represented by the Price  (Percent)
|                                                                                            
|                                                                                            
|Percent of Commercial Natural Gas Deliveries in Oklahoma Represented by the Price  (Percent)
|                                                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 92.1   | 91.3   | 88.5   | 90.0   | 88.5   | 85.2   | 84.5   | 81.8   | 73.2   | 71.6  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 72.4   | 74.0   | 71.0   | 71.3   | 61.6   | 53.1   | 49.9   | 48.1   | 51.3   | 46.4  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 47.5   | 46.3   | 41.1   | 44.6   | 45.3   | 43.8   | 42.0   | 42.2   | 45.5   | 44.9  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 43.8   | 46.2   | 45.4   | 46.2   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### State v. LaRue

105,464

07/19/13

Denied. .

Unpublished
#### ROSS, S. v. UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA

1238 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/06/2017

Reargument Denied 8/25/2017

Mat Term, 2015 No. 1225

(Philadelphia)

Affirmed
Exhibit 10.46
  
     Amendment of the Agreement
  1.
    
    Adjustment of Principal Amount of Promissory Note; Payment for Second Cell.The
parties acknowledge that Alexza has requested that Autoliv cease work on the second cell
of the first Commercial Production Line, and pursuant to Section 5.4 (iii) of the
Agreement as amended the parties agree that (a) the principal amount of the Note is hereby reduced to
$2.8 million, (b) the monthly payments on the Note will be $67,903.49 and (c) Alexza will
make the first payment upon




---



##### 



the Effective Date of Amendment No. 2. Autoliv will return the
existing Note, and Alexza will issue a new Note in the form attached as Exhibit 1 hereto.
In the event and to the extent that Alexza requests in writing that Autoliv shall provide
the second cell of the First Commercial Production Line Autoliv shall complete, install and
fully qualify such second cell at a cost of $1,200,000 in accordance with the terms and
conditions of Section 5.4 (iv) of the Agreement as amended.2.
    
    Clarification regarding pricing.The Parties agree that pursuant to Section 3.3 of
the Agreement the prices set forth in Exhibit C of the Agreement apply to annual volumes
purchased by Alexza. By way of illustration and for purposes of clarification, if in a
year Alexza purchases [*] Heat Packages, the price per Heat package will be $[*] and the
total cost to Alexza for the [*] Heat Packages will be $[*].3.
    
    Miscellaneous.
 (i)
    
    Full Force and Effect. Except as expressly amended by this amendment
No. 2, the Agreement as amended by Amendment No. 1 shall remain unchanged and shall
continue in full force and effect as provided therein.(ii)
    
    Entire Agreement of the Parties. This Amendment No. 2, Amendment
No. 1, the Agreement and the Exhibits hereto and thereto, constitute the complete,
final and exclusive understanding and agreement of the parties with respect to the
subject matter of the Agreement and supersede any and all prior or contemporaneous
negotiations, correspondence, understandings and agreements, whether oral or written,
between the parties respecting the subject matter of the Agreement.(iii)
    
    Counterparts. This Amendment No. 2 may be executed in two or more
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together
shall constitute one and the same instrument.




---



##### 



ALEXZA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.By
    
    /s/ August J. MorettiPrint name
    
    August J. MorettiTitle
    
    CFO
 AUTOLIV ASP, INC.By
    
    /s/ Michael J. WardPrint name
    
    Michael J. WardTitle
    
    President
Exhibit 32(d)

Certification of the CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*

This certification is provided
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and accompanies the Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K (the Form 10-K/A) for the year ended
January 1, 2012 of Tim Hortons Inc. (the Issuer).

I, Cynthia J. Devine, the Chief Financial Officer of the Issuer certify
that, to the best of my knowledge:

(i) the Form 10-K/A fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

(ii) the information
contained in the Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.

Dated: March 23, 2012



/s/ CYNTHIA J. DEVINEName: Cynthia J. Devine




|* | This certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates this certification therein by reference.
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### State v. Moore

106,209

08/30/13

Denied. ...

Unpublished
|                                                                            
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                              
|View History:                                                               
|                                                                            
|Rhode Island Natural Gas Industrial Price  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                            
|                                                                            
|Rhode Island Natural Gas Industrial Price  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 4.33   | 3.82   | 4.40  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 5.38   | 6.61   | 4.84   | 8.19   | 9.63   | 11.23  | 13.32  | 12.58  | 13.26  | 12.58 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 12.13  | 10.98  | 9.78   | 9.04   | 10.27  | 9.26   | 8.70   | 8.48   | 10.46  | 9.70  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 9.16   | 9.81   | 10.99  | 12.76  |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
# C_2019034EN.01000101.xml

| 28.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 34/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 34/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9017 — SK Capital Partners/Schenectady International Group)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 34/01)

On 11 October 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9017. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9017. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21



                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT*


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                               STATE OR
                                           JURISDICTION OF              PERCENT OF
          NAME**                            INCORPORATION               OWNERSHIP
          ----                              -------------               ----------      
<S>                                           <C>                           <C> 
The Little Tikes Company                      Ohio                          100%
Graco Children's Products Inc.                Delaware                      100%
Rubbermaid Commercial Products Inc.           Delaware                      100%   
</TABLE>

     
*    All of the listed subsidiaries are included in Registrant's consolidated
     financial statements.

**   All subsidiaries conduct their businesses under the names shown.
No. 12-6042.

#### Ciacci *v.*Hawaii.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# mecs02
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Derek Clinton Ward, Appellant

No. 06

- 15

- 00110

- CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 124th District Court of Gregg County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 42433

- B ). Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Derek Clinton Ward, has adequately indicated his inability to

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED NOVEMBER 10 , 2015

BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Micronetics, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended June 28, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), David Robbins, President, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.



|                |  |        |  |                                                                                                    
|--------------- |  | ------ |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|August 12, 2008 |  |        |  | /s/ DAVID ROBBINS                                                                                  
|                |  | Name:  |  | David Robbins                                                                                      
|                |  | Title: |  | President, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 92 (Friday, May 11, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 27833]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-11281]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart B 
(Formerly Subpart Q) During the Week Ending March 31, 2012

    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience 
and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart 
B (formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural 
Regulations (See 14 CFR 301.201 et. seq.). The due date for Answers, 
Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below 
for each application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the 
application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the 
adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate 
cases a final order without further proceedings.
    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2012-0047.
    Date Filed: March 27, 2012.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion To Modify 
Scope: April 17, 2012.

Description

    Application of Joint Stock Company Aircompany ``Yakutia'' 
(``Yakutia'') requesting an exemption and a foreign air carrier permit 
authorizing Yakutia to engage in scheduled foreign air transportation 
of persons, property, and mail between any point or points in the 
Russian Federation and any point or points in Alaska. Yakutia further 
requests that its exemption and permit authorize it to engage in 
charter foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail 
between any point or points in the Russian Federation and any point or 
points in the United States and to conduct other charter trips in 
foreign air transportation.

Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2012-11281 Filed 5-10-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
```