alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1CERTIFICATIONSI, William L. Yde III, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Global Traffic Network, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Dated: September 24, 2007         By:  /s/ William L. Yde III    William L. Yde III, Chief Executive Officer    and President (Principal Executive Officer)
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

KENNETH BERNARD HALL

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 3318

[ February 28, 2019 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Ilona Maxine Holmes

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 05

- 11281CF10A

.

Kenneth Bernard Hall, Okeechobee, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

M AY

, D AMOORGIAN and F ORST

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
KPMG LLP
Suite 601
12 Fountain Plaza
Buffalo, NY 14202

                          Independent Accountants' Report

The Board of Directors
HSBC Mortgage Corporation (USA):


We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying
Management Assertion, that HSBC Mortgage Corporation (USA) complied with the
minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of
America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers
(USAP) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2005. Management is
responsible for HSBC Mortgage Corporation (USA)'s compliance with those
minimum servicing standards. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance based on our
examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about HSBC
Mortgage Corporation (USA)'s compliance with the minimum servicing standards
specified above and performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal
determination on IISBC Mortgage Corporation (USA)'s compliance with the
minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that HSBC Mortgage Corporation (USA)
complied with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards during the year
ended December 31, 2005 is fairly stated, in all material respects.


/s/KPMG LLP
------------
KPMG LLP


February 27, 2006

        KPMG LLP  a U.S. limited liability partnership, is the U.S.
           member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss Cooperative.










HSBC



                           Management Assertion

As of and for the year ended December 31, 2005, HSBC Mortgage Corporation
(USA) complied in all material respects with the minimum servicing standards
set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single
Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers. As of and for this same period,
HSBC Mortgage Corporation (USA) had in effect fidelity bond and errors and
omissions policies in the amount of $697,425,000 and $10,000,000,
respectively.


/s/ Michael T. Stilb
---------------------
Michael T. Stilb
SVP, Mortgage Servicing

/s/ Thomas Scanlon
---------------------
Thomas Scanlon
Chief Accounting Officer

/s/ Susan Wojnar
---------------------
Susan Wojnar
SVP, Mortgage Servicing and Business Administration








HSBC Mortgage Corporation (USA)
2929 Walden Avenue, Depew, NY 14043
Exhibit 99.3 - Annual Statement of Compliance for the year
	       ended December 31, 2005


a)

AURORA LOAN SERVICES
A Lehman Brothers Company


Via UPS

February 23, 2006


Diana Kenneally
U.S. Bank National Association
1 Federal Street, 3rd Floor
Boston, MA 02110

RE:	LXS 2005-7N

	Annual Officer's Certificate as to Compliance

Dear Ms. Kenneally:

The undersigned Officer certifies the following for the period ending on
December 31, 2005:

1.	I have reviewed the activities and performance of the Master Servicer
	during the preceding calendar year under the terms of the Trust
	Agreements and to the best of this Officer's knowledge, the Master
	Servicer has fulfilled all of its duties, responsibilities or
	obligations under the Agreements;

2.	Based on said review and to the best of this Officer's knowledge, the
	Master Servicer is not in default of its obligations under the terms of
	the Trust Agreements in any material respect, or, if there is a default
	in the fulfillment of its obligations, a description of each default or
	failure and the nature and status thereof has been reported to this
	Officer;

3.	To the best of this Officer's knowledge, nothing has arose to lead this
	Officer to believe that its Servicer has failed to perform any of its
	duties, responsibilities and obligations under its Servicing Agreement
	during the preceding calendar year;

4.	To the best of this Officer's knowledge, the Servicer is not in default
	of its obligations under the terms of its Servicing Agreement in any
	material respect, or, if there is a default in the fulfillment of its
	obligations, a description of each default or failure and the nature and
	status thereof has been reported tO this Officer;

5.	The Master Servicer has received from its Servicer such Servicer's
	annual certificate of compliance and a copy of such Servicer's annual
	audit report,in each case to the extent required under the applicable
	Servicing Agreement, or, if any such certificate or report has not been
	received by the Master Servicer, the Master Servicer is using its best
	reasonable efforts to obtain such certificate or report.


Certified By:



/s/ R. Peter Karr
R. Peter Karr
Senior Vice President
Master Servicing Division
#### Moore v. State

110,390

08/20/2015

Denied. ..

Unpublished
|                                                                                      
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                        
|View History:                                                                         
|                                                                                      
|Massachusetts Natural Gas Deliveries to Electric Power Consumers  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                      
|                                                                                      
|Massachusetts Natural Gas Deliveries to Electric Power Consumers  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |         | 117,259 | 101,682 | 93,126 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 88,089  | 96,294  | 128,852 | 169,252 | 157,400 | 152,429 | 168,970 | 183,231 | 154,984 | 150,161
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 185,842 | 185,903 | 179,598 | 154,217 | 134,858 | 156,795 | 156,433 | 162,967 | 133,711 | 112,746
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 104,718 | 111,512 | 119,079 | 109,583 |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 64 (Thursday, April 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15939-15940]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-8454]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993; International Pharmaceutical Aerosol Consortium 
for Toxicology Testing of HFA-134a (IPACT-I)

    Notice is hereby given that, on March 6, 1997, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. Sec. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), the International 
Pharmaceutical Aerosol Consortium for Toxicology Testing of HFA-134a 
(``IPACT-I'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing a change 
in the name of one of its members. The notifications were filed for the 
purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of 
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, as a result of a merger, Ciba-Geigy Limited, Basel, 
Switzerland, is now known as Novartis Pharma, Inc., Basel, Switzerland.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of IPACT-I. Membership in this group research project remains 
open, and IPACT-I intends to file additional

[[Page 15940]]

written notification disclosing all changes in membership.
    On August 7, 1990, IPACT-I filed its original notification pursuant 
to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a 
notice in the Federal Register puruant to Section 6(b) of the Act on 
September 6, 1990 (55 FR 36710).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on April 15, 
1996. The Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal 
Register on April 29, 1996 (61 FR 18755).
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 97-8454 Filed 4-2-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF UPWARD TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION AS OF AND FOR THE NINE
MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         201,353
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               201,775
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 201,775
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,348
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       162,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      33,427
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   201,775
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,941
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                17,263
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,322)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,322)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,322)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
|                                                                           
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                             
|View History:                                                              
|                                                                           
|Connecticut Natural Gas Industrial Price  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                           
|                                                                           
|Connecticut Natural Gas Industrial Price  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 4.73   | 4.34   | 4.15  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 5.95   | 6.77   | 4.97   | 7.52   | 9.32   | 11.68  | 10.86  | 10.54  | 12.63  | 8.44  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 9.60   | 9.16   | 8.83   | 6.85   | 8.07   | 6.35   | 6.07   | 6.48   | 6.55   | 6.82  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 6.25   | 7.63   | 10.37  | 8.71   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### September 11, 2012 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, No. 12-2038 v. (D. New Mexico) ROBERT SANCHEZ, Defendant - Appellant. (D.C. No. 1:10-CR-03449-JB-1)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before MURPHY , ANDERSON , and HARTZ , Circuit Judges.
Defendant Robert Sanchez pleaded guilty to one count of possession with intent to distribute 100 grams or more of heroin, one count of being a felon in possession of a firearm, and one count of possessing a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime. The minimum sentence for the felon-in-possession count was 180 months’ imprisonment, and the mandatory sentence for the other firearm count was 60 months, to run consecutively to the sentences on the other counts.

* After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously to honor the parties’ request for a decision on the briefs without oral argument. SeeFed. R. App. P. 34(f); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.The undisputed sentencing guideline range was 322 to 387 months’ imprisonment. The district court varied downward to impose a sentence of 292 months. The only challenge on appeal is that the sentence was substantively unreasonable. Because the sentence was below the guidelines range, we presume that the sentence was not unreasonably long. See United States v. Balbin-Mesa , 643 F.3d 783, 788 (10th Cir. 2011). Defendant has not persuaded us that the presumption has been overcome. Therefore, we AFFIRM the sentence. ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Harris L Hartz Circuit Judge

-2-
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 61 

Commending the Columbus Crew Major League Soccer Team for winning 

the 2008 Major League Soccer Cup. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 2, 2009 

Mr. VOINOVICH (for himself and Mr. BROWN) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

MARCH 23, 2009 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Commending the Columbus Crew Major League Soccer Team 

for winning the 2008 Major League Soccer Cup. 

Whereas, on Sunday, November 23, 2008, the Columbus 

Crew defeated the New York Red Bulls by a score of 3– 

1 to win the 2008 Major League Soccer (MLS) Cup; 

Whereas the Columbus Crew led the league with a record of 

17 wins, 7 losses, and 6 draws and scored 50 regular season goals and 8 playoff goals; 

Whereas Columbus Crew head coach Sigi Schmid was named 

the 2008 MLS Coach of the Year and became the first 

MLS Coach to win an MLS Cup with two different 

teams; 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

SRES 61 ATS 

Whereas Columbus Crew forward Guillermo Barros Schelotto 

was named the 2008 MLS Most Valuable Player and led 

the league with 19 regular season assists and 6 playoff 

assists; 

Whereas Columbus Crew defender Chad Marshall was named 

the 2008 MLS Defender of the Year; 

Whereas Columbus Crew forward Alejandro Moreno led the 

team in scoring with 9 regular season goals and 1 playoff 

goal; 

Whereas Columbus Crew goalkeeper Will Hesmer had 17 

wins, 97 saves, and 10 shutouts in 29 regular season 

games; 

Whereas Alejandro Moreno, Chad Marshall, and Frankie 

Hejduk all scored goals in the MLS Cup Championship 

game; 

Whereas the Columbus Crew was the winner of the 2008 

MLS Supporters’ Shield for being the team with the best 

regular season record; 

Whereas Columbus Crew Captain Frankie Hejduk led the 

team to its first MLS Cup since the team’s creation in 

1994; and 

Whereas the Columbus Crew, along with its supporters, has 

energized Columbus and brought great pride to the State 

of Ohio: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) congratulates the Columbus Crew on win3 ning the 2008 Major League Soccer Cup; 

4 (2) recognizes the achievements of Sigi Schmid, 

5 Chad Marshall, Guillermo Barros Schelotto, and the 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
3 

SRES 61 ATS 

1 other members of the Columbus Crew for their tire2 less work ethic and championship form; 

3 (3) salutes the support of the Columbus Crew 

4 fan groups, including the Hudson Street Hooligans, 

5 the Crew Union, La Turbina Amarilla, and the rest 

6 of the Nordecke for unwavering dedication to the 

7 Columbus Crew; and 

8 (4) expresses the hope that the Columbus Crew 

9 and Major League Soccer will continue to inspire 

10 soccer fans and players throughout Ohio, the United 

11 States, and the world. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
#### LaRue v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue

105,546

08/19/13

Denied.

Unpublished