alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7393

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL JONES,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District 

Judge. (1:09-cr-00287-WDQ-7; 1:11-cv-01765-WDQ)

Submitted: March 29, 2012 Decided: April 2, 2012

Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Christine Marie Celeste, 

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael Jones seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying as untimely his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 

2011) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit 

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of appealability 

will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Jones has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of LSB Industries, Inc. (“LSB”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report").  I, Jack E. Golsen, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of LSB, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of LSB.








/s/ Jack E. Golsen


Jack E. Golsen


Chairman of the Board and


Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive officer)








November 4, 2010








This certification is furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. §1350 subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.
# Jf3SV? ELECTRONIC RECORD
COA# 02-13-00071-CR Jeremy Deshon Hopkins v. The 

### STYLE: Stateof Texas COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED 

### OFFENSE: 29.03 COUNTY: Tarrant TRIAL COURT: 396th District Court DATE: 09/25/14 Publish: NO TC CASE #: 1247597D



### IN THE COURT OF CRIMINALAPPEALS Jeremy Deshon Hopkins v. The State STYLE: ofTexas 

# APPELLANT^ Petition FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: 

# DATE: j2-//7/24)1/ JUDGE: fa UMa^— CCA#: 

# W31-W CCADisposition: DATE: 

### JUDGE: SIGNED: PUBLISH:

REHEARING IN CCA IS: JUDGE: PC: DNP:

MOTION FOR

ELECTRONIC RECORD
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned executive officers of United Community Bancorp (the Registrant) hereby certify that this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2008 (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.



By:

/s/ William F. RitzmannName:

William F. RitzmannTitle:

President and Chief Executive OfficerBy:

/s/ Vicki A. MarchName:

Vicki A. MarchTitle:

Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer


Date: September 26, 2008
**EXHIBIT 12.2**CertificationI, Victor Vial, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Copa Holdings, S.A.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report;  4. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the company, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance withgenerally accepted accounting principles;(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual reportthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, thecompany’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditorsand the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financialreporting.Date:May 9, 2008       /s/Victor Vial   Victor Vial    Chief Financial Officer  (Section 302CFO Certification)
No. 12-5729.

#### Allen *v.*Florida.

Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 4th Dist. Certiorari denied.
# C_2019405EN.01002001.xml

| 2.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 405/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 405/20

---

Corrigendum to Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9598 — Allianz/T&R) Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Official Journal of the European Union C 394 of 21 November 2019)

(2019/C 405/13)

On page 8, in the first paragraph:

for:

‘On 11 November 2019, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).’,

read:

‘On 13 November 2019, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).’.

---
|                                                                       
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                         
|View History:                                                          
|                                                                       
|Wyoming Natural Gas Industrial Price  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                       
|                                                                       
|Wyoming Natural Gas Industrial Price  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 3.49   | 3.37   | 3.30  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 4.07   | 6.33   | 5.24   | 5.34   | 6.77   | 8.26   | 8.90   | 6.61   | 7.55   | 5.79  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 4.91   | 5.57   | 4.87   | 4.62   | 5.89   | 5.07   | 3.96   | 4.28   | 3.92   | 3.91  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 4.16   | 5.76   | 8.60   | NA     |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 293 

Relative to the death of Henry Louis Bellmon, former United States Senator 

for the State of Oklahoma. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2009 

Mr. REID (for himself, Mr. MCCONNELL, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. COBURN, Mr. 

AKAKA, Mr. ALEXANDER, Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. BAUCUS, Mr. BAYH, Mr. 

BEGICH, Mr. BENNET, Mr. BENNETT, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mr. BOND, Mrs. 

BOXER, Mr. BROWN, Mr. BROWNBACK, Mr. BUNNING, Mr. BURR, Mr. 

BURRIS, Mr. BYRD, Ms. CANTWELL, Mr. CARDIN, Mr. CARPER, Mr. 

CASEY, Mr. CHAMBLISS, Mr. COCHRAN, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. CONRAD, Mr. 

CORKER, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. DEMINT, Mr. DODD, Mr. DORGAN, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. ENSIGN, Mr. ENZI, Mr. FEINGOLD, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. FRANKEN, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. GRASSLEY, 

Mr. GREGG, Mrs. HAGAN, Mr. HARKIN, Mr. HATCH, Mrs. HUTCHISON, 

Mr. INOUYE, Mr. ISAKSON, Mr. JOHANNS, Mr. JOHNSON, Mr. KAUFMAN, 

Mr. KERRY, Mr. KIRK, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Mr. KOHL, Mr. KYL, Ms. 

LANDRIEU, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mr. LEMIEUX, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. LEVIN, 

Mr. LIEBERMAN, Mrs. LINCOLN, Mr. LUGAR, Mr. MCCAIN, Mrs. 

MCCASKILL, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mr. MERKLEY, Ms. MIKULSKI, Ms. MURKOWSKI, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. NELSON of Nebraska, Mr. NELSON of Florida, Mr. PRYOR, Mr. REED, Mr. RISCH, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. ROCKEFELLER, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. SCHUMER, Mr. SESSIONS, Mrs. SHAHEEN, 

Mr. SHELBY, Ms. SNOWE, Mr. SPECTER, Ms. STABENOW, Mr. TESTER, 

Mr. THUNE, Mr. UDALL of Colorado, Mr. UDALL of New Mexico, Mr. 

VITTER, Mr. VOINOVICH, Mr. WARNER, Mr. WEBB, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, 

Mr. WICKER, and Mr. WYDEN) submitted the following resolution; which 

was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Relative to the death of Henry Louis Bellmon, former United 

States Senator for the State of Oklahoma. 


erowe on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 293 ATS 

Whereas Henry Bellmon served as a United States Marine 

from 1942–1946, where he served as a platoon tank commander in the Pacific theater, and was awarded the Legion of Merit for his service in Saipan and the Silver 

Star for bravery in action on Iwo Jima; 

Whereas Henry Bellmon served as a Major in the Marine 

Corps Reserve until 1954; 

Whereas Henry Bellmon served two non-consecutive terms as 

governor of the State of Oklahoma from 1963–1967, 

when he was elected as the State’s first Republican governor, and from 1987–1991; and 

Whereas Henry Bellmon served the people of Oklahoma with 

distinction for 12 years in the United States Senate from 

1969–1981: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate has heard with profound 

2 sorrow and deep regret the announcement of the death 

3 of the Honorable Henry Bellmon, former member of the 

4 United States Senate. 

5 Resolved, That the Secretary of the Senate commu6 nicate these resolutions to the House of Representatives 

7 and transmit an enrolled copy thereof to the family of the 

8 deceased. 

9 Resolved, That when the Senate adjourns today, it 

10 stand adjourned as a further mark of respect to the mem11 ory of the Honorable Henry Bellmon. 

Æ 


erowe on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
Certification Pursuant to 18 USC Sec.1350, as adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of



 Exhibit 10.1 
  
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 
  
 In connection with the Annual Report of Telefónica Móviles, S.A. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31,
2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certify that to the best of our knowledge: 
  

	 	1.	 	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

  

	 	2.	 	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

  
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 
  
 In accordance with the interim guidance for Section 906 certification issued by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on March 21, 2003 in
Release No. 33-8212, this certification will not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference. 
  
 Date: June 27, 2003 

	
	/s/    ANTONIO VIANA-BAPTISTA         
	

	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


 Date: June 27, 2003 

	
	/s/    ERNESTO LÓPEZ MOZO        
	

	Chief Financial Officer
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20

- 2229

In re: WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR., a/k/a William Scott Davis, II , Petitioner

.

No. 20

- 2240

In re: WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR., a/k/a William Scott Davis, II , Petitioner

.

No. 20

- 2301

In re: WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR. , Petitioner.

On Petitions for Writ of Mandamus . ( 5:14

- cr - 00240

- BR

- 1 )

Submitted : March 23, 2021 Decided: March 26, 2021

Before THACKER , QUATTLEBAUM, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Petitions denied by un published per curiam opinion

.2 William Scott Davis, Jr. , Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM: William Scott Davis, Jr. , has filed several petitions for a writ of mandamus that: (1) raise several claims challenging his conviction and sentence; (2) seek the recusal of the district court judge; and (3) challenge the district court’s orders, entered in 2017 and 2018
in Davis’ c riminal case, instructing the district court clerk not to docket his pro se filings.
We conclude that Davis is not entitled to mandamus relief. Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary
circumstances. Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Ct. , 542 U.S. 367, 380 (2004) ; In re Murphy

- Brown,
LLC , 907 F.3d 788, 795 (4th Cir. 2018) . Further, mandamus relief is available only when
th e petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. Murphy

- Brown , 907 F.3d at 795. Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal. In re Lockheed Martin Corp. , 503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007).
Davis has not shown that he is entitled to the drasti c remedy of mandamus

. To the extent Davis challenges his conviction and sentence, he must bring these claims in a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion or 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. While Davis claims that the district judge is biased, his claims of bias are simply ba sed on his dissatisfaction with the judge’s rulings. Finally, the district court’s orders in 2017 and 2018 were entered to stop Davis from filing pro se motions while his case was awaiting sentencing and while Davis was represented by counsel. This actio n was well within the district court’s discretion. Moreover, Davis should have challenged these orders on direct appeal and may not use
mandamus as a substitute for his failure to do so.4 Accordingly, we deny the petition s for a writ of mandamus. We dispe nse with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION S DENIED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1411

LINE L. THRONE,

Petitioner,

versus

NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING AND DRY DOCK COMPANY; APPLIED CONSTRUCTION, INCORPORATED; S.G.

BROWN, INCORPORATED; UNIVERSAL MARINE, INCORPORATED; UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY

COMPANY; ITT HARTFORD; COMMERCIAL UNION

INSURANCE COMPANY,

Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.

(96-440)

Submitted: August 15, 1996 Decided: August 27, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Line L. Throne, Petitioner Pro Se. Lawrence Philip Postol,

SEYFARTH, SHAW, FAIRWEATHER & GERALDSON, Washington, D.C.; Gerard

E.W. Voyer, TAYLOR & WALKER, P.C., Norfolk, Virginia; Philip John

Infantino, PENDER & COWARD, Virginia Beach, Virginia; Steven Harold

Theisen, MIDKIFF & HINER, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision

and order dismissing his appeal of the administrative law judge's

denial of asbestosis benefits pursuant to 33 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-950.

(West 1986 & Supp. 1996). Our review of the record discloses that

the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and is

without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning

of the Board. Throne v. Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Co.,

No. 96-440 (B.R.B., Feb. 29, 1996). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 68 (Wednesday, April 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 17283]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-9098]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 33384]


Consolidated Rail Corporation; Trackage Rights Exemption; 
Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company

    The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company (BNSF) will 
agree to grant local trackage rights to Consolidated Rail Corporation 
(Conrail) between a connection near Panhandle Crossing (Ash Street) 
located in Chicago, IL, BNSF's milepost 4.51 and a connection near 
McCook, IL, at BNSF's milepost 12.9, to the town of Willow Springs, IL, 
BNSF's milepost 17.72, a distance of approximately 13.21 miles.
    The transaction is scheduled to be consummated on or about April 7, 
1997. The purpose of the trackage rights is to allow Conrail to operate 
intermodal trains into BNSF's intermodal terminal at Willow Springs, 
IL.
    As a condition to this exemption, any employees affected by the 
trackage rights will be protected by the conditions imposed in Norfolk 
and Western Ry. Co.--Trackage Rights--BN, 354 I.C.C. 605 (1978), as 
modified in Mendocino Coast Ry., Inc.--Lease and Operate, 360 I.C.C. 
653 (1980).
    This notice is filed under 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(7). If it contains 
false or misleading information, the exemption is void ab initio. 
Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed 
at any time. The filing of a petition to revoke will not automatically 
stay the transaction.
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 33384, must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, Office of the Secretary, Case Control Unit, 1925 K Street, N.W., 
Washington, DC 20423- 0001. In addition, a copy of each pleading must 
be served on John K. Enright, Esq., Conrail Law Department, 16-A, 2001 
Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19101-1416.

    Decided: April 2, 1997.

    By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-9098 Filed 4-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
[Exhibit 10.2]


                       Consent of Director


June 24, 2003



Gentlemen:

I hereby consent to the use of my name in the registration of the
securities of Link Plus Corp. (Tax ID. # 52-1018174).

Sincerely,



/s/Robert L. Jones, Jr.
4933 Snowy Reach
Columbia, MD  21043