alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 12

                    MAPCO INC. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                 (In Millions)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                      Six Months Ended
                                                       June 30, 1997      1996        1995         1994       1993        1992
                                                      ----------------  --------    --------    --------   --------    --------
<S>                                                      <C>            <C>         <C>         <C>        <C>         <C>     
Earnings as defined:
  Income from continuing operations before provision
    for income taxes and minority interest ...........   $  139.8       $  214.4    $  105.9    $   80.9   $  156.2    $  109.3
  Fixed charges ......................................       31.6           63.1        65.7        59.6       54.9        58.8
  Capitalized interest included in fixed charges .....       (1.3)           (.5)       (1.7)       --         (2.8)       (2.0)
  Amortization of capitalized interest ...............        1.0            2.1         2.5         2.5        2.4         2.3
                                                         --------       --------    --------    --------   --------    --------

          Total ......................................   $  171.1       $  279.1    $  172.4    $  143.0   $  210.7    $  168.4
                                                         ========       ========    ========    ========   ========    ========

Fixed charges as defined:
  Interest and debt expense (includes amortization
    of debt expense and discount) ....................   $   27.8       $   57.5    $   58.4    $   53.5   $   46.7    $   51.1
  Capitalized interest ...............................        1.3             .5         1.7        --          2.8         2.0
  Portion of rentals representative of the interest
    factor ...........................................        2.5            5.1         5.6         6.1        5.4         5.7
                                                         --------       --------    --------    --------   --------    --------

          Total ......................................   $   31.6       $   63.1    $   65.7    $   59.6   $   54.9    $   58.8
                                                         ========       ========    ========    ========   ========    ========

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges ...................        5.4            4.4         2.6         2.4        3.8         2.9
                                                         ========       ========    ========    ========   ========    ========

</TABLE>



                                    63 of 64
# C_2019156EN.01000101.xml

| 7.5.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 156/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.5.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 156/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9346 — Investcorp/Aberdeen/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 156/01)

On 26 April 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9346. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9346. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 375 

Honoring the life and service of breast cancer advocate, Stefanie Spielman. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 14, 2009 

Mr. VOINOVICH (for himself and Mr. BROWN) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the life and service of breast cancer advocate, 

Stefanie Spielman. 

Whereas Stefanie Spielman, a tremendous advocate and a 

true champion for the cause of breast cancer research, 

passed away on November 19, 2009, after a decade-long 

battle with breast cancer; 

Whereas despite her constant battle with her own illness, 

Stefanie showed grace and compassion for others, touching countless lives in Ohio and beyond; 

Whereas Stefanie tirelessly advocated for additional research 

into the prevention and treatment of breast cancer, and 

along with her husband, Chris, founded the Stefanie 

Spielman Fund for Breast Cancer Research at the Ohio 

State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – James 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 375 ATS 

Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute shortly 

after her diagnosis; 

Whereas Stefanie and Chris later established the Stefanie 

Spielman Fund for Patient Assistance, which to date has 

generated more than $6,500,000 to help translate laboratory discoveries into effective treatments for breast cancer patients; 

Whereas Stefanie served as an active and vital member of the 

James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute 

Foundation Board; 

Whereas Stefanie was actively engaged in advocacy issues, including Ohio Mammography Day, which received the 

strong support of former Ohio First Lady Janet 

Voinovich and was designated by the Ohio General Assembly as the third Thursday in October; 

Whereas in 2000, Stefanie and Chris established ‘‘Stefanie’s 

Champions’’ to honor one of the most important factors 

in cancer treatment – the loving and healing presence of 

a devoted caregiver; 

Whereas Stefanie gave the first Champion award to her beloved husband after Chris put his professional football career on hold to care for her when she was first treated; 

and 

Whereas Stefanie was a loving mother to her 4 children: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) acknowledges the outstanding achievements 

3 and profound impact of Stefanie Spielman in the 

4 fight against breast cancer; 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 375 ATS 

1 (2) commends Stefanie for her commitment to 

2 caring for others suffering from breast cancer; and 

3 (3) celebrates her life as a wife, mother, and 

4 advocate for breast cancer awareness, research, and 

5 treatment. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo 

 

No. 07-20-00359-CR 

 

AUSTIN CALLAWAY SELLERS, APPELLANT 

V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE 

On Appeal from the 47th District Court 

 Randall County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 28,416-A, Honorable Dan L. Schaap, Presiding 

January 12, 2021 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before PIRTLE and PARKER and DOSS, JJ. 

Appellant, Austin Callaway Sellers, appeals his conviction for assault of a family or 

household member,

1 enhanced, and sentence to six years’ confinement. We dismiss the 

appeal for want of jurisdiction.

The trial court sentenced appellant on November 4, 2020. Because no motion for 

new trial was filed, appellant’s notice of appeal was due within thirty days after sentence 

1 TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.01(b)(2)(A) (West Supp. 2020).
2

was imposed, i.e., by December 4, 2020. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1) (requiring a 

notice of appeal to be filed within thirty days after sentence is imposed). Appellant filed 

a notice of appeal on December 17, 2020, without filing a motion for an extension of time 

to file the notice of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3 (allowing appellate courts to extend 

the time to file a notice of appeal if the notice and a motion for an extension is filed within 

fifteen days of the deadline).

The timely filing of a written notice of appeal is a jurisdictional prerequisite to 

hearing an appeal. Castillo v. State, 369 S.W.3d 196, 198 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012). If a 

notice of appeal is not timely filed, a court of appeals has no option but to dismiss the 

appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Id. When a notice of appeal, but no motion for an extension 

of time, is filed within the fifteen-day extension period, an appellate court lacks jurisdiction 

to dispose of the purported appeal in any manner other than by dismissing it for want of 

jurisdiction. 2 Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 523 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996) (en banc).

By letter of December 22, 2020, we notified appellant of the consequences of his 

late notice of appeal and directed him to file a response showing how we have jurisdiction

by December 31. Appellant did not file a response and has had no further communication 

with this Court.

2 Unlike civil appeals, a motion for an extension of time is not implied when a notice of appeal is 

filed within the fifteen-day extension period. Lair v. State, 321 S.W.3d 158, 159 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st 

Dist.] 2010, pet. ref’d).
3

Because appellant’s notice of appeal was untimely filed, we dismiss the appeal for 

want of jurisdiction.3

Per Curiam

Do not publish.

3 Appellant may be entitled to relief by filing an application for writ of habeas corpus returnable to 

the Court of Criminal Appeals for consideration of an out-of-time appeal. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. 

art. 11.07 (West 2015).
September 8, 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations 

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Exemption Request Section 333 Docket Number FAA-2015-2361. Request for Aircraft 

Information 

Dear Sir or Madam:

Skyline Photography uses two different types of multi-rotor aircraft. 

• DJI Phantom 2 Vision + (maximum weight 1000 grams, 4 rotors) 

• DJI Spreading Wings S1000 (maximum weight 11kg, 8 rotors) 

Please let us know if any additional information is needed.

Sincerely yours,

Mark Dalton 

Owner 

Skyline Photography

SKYLINE PHOTOGRAPHY LLC
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 10 (Wednesday, January 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2178-2179]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-971]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Register of Historic Places; Notification of Pending 
Nominations

    Nominations for the following properties being considered for 
listing in the National Register were received by the National Park 
Service before January 4, 1997. Pursuant to Sec. 60.13 of 36 CFR Part 
60 written comments concerning the significance of these properties 
under the National Register criteria for evaluation may be forwarded to 
the National Register, National Park Service, P.O. Box 37127, 
Washington, D.C. 20013-7127. Written comments should be submitted by 
January 30, 1997.
Carol D. Shull,
Keeper of the National Register.

ALASKA

Dillingham Borough-Census Area

Aniakchak Bay Historic Landscape District, Surrounding the Aniakchak 
River from Aniakchak Crater to Aniakchak Bay, Aniakchak National 
Preserve, Chignik vicinity, 97000016

COLORADO

Denver County

Bluebird Theater, 3315--3317 E. Colfax Ave., Denver, 97000018

Morgan County

Knearl School, 314 S. Clayton St., Brush, 97000017

IOWA

Pottawattamie County,

Turner, Francis A. And Rose M., House, 1004 Cherry St., Avoca, 
96001583

MINNESOTA

St. Louis County

Virginia Commercial Historic District, Chestnut St. between 1st and 
6th Aves., Virginia, 97000020

Steele County

Owatonna City and Firemen's Hall, 107 W. Main St., Owatonna, 
97000019

NORTH CAROLINA

Craven County

New Bern National Cemetery (Civil War National Cemeteries MPS), 1711 
National Ave., New Bern, 97000023

[[Page 2179]]

New Hanover County

Wilmington National Cemetery (Civil War Era National Cemeteries 
MPS), 2011 Market St., Wilmington, 97000021

Wake County

Raleigh National Cemetery (Civil War Era National Cemeteries MPS) 
501 Rock Quarry Rd., Raleigh, 97000022

VERMONT

Grand Isle County

South Stone School House (Educational Resources of Vermont MPS) VT 
129, jct. with Quarry Rd., Isle LaMotte, 97000025

Rutland County

Kidder, Asahel, House, VT 22A, S of jct. with Bolger Rd., Fair 
Haven, 97000024

Windsor County

King Farm, The (Agricultural Resources of Vermont MPS) King Farm 
Rd., .5 mi. N of jct with US 4, Woodstock, 97000026

WASHINGTON

Pend Oreille County

United States Border Station, Roughly bounded by WA 31 and the U.S.-
Canadian border, Colville National Forest, Metaline Falls vicinity, 
96001634
[FR Doc. 97-971 Filed 1-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT (23)


               Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of Russell Corporation of our report dated February 8, 2002, except for the
sixth paragraph of Note 8, as to which the date is March 5, 2002, included in
the 2001 Annual Report to Shareholders of Russell Corporation.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Russell Corporation
listed in Item 14(a). This schedule is the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In
our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when considered
in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly
in all material respects the information set forth therein.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
of Russell Corporation listed below of our report referred to above, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements incorporated herein by
reference, and our report included in the preceding paragraph with respect to
the financial statement schedule included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of
Russell Corporation.

                  Form S-8          Registration Statement No.  33-24898
                  Form S-3          Registration Statement No.  33-47906
                  Form S-3          Registration Statement No.  33-54361
                  Form S-8          Registration Statement No.  33-69679
                  Form S-8          Registration Statement No. 333-89765
                  Form S-8          Registration Statement No. 333-30236
                  Form S-8          Registration Statement No. 333-30238
                  Form S-8          Registration Statement No. 333-55338
                  Form S-8          Registration Statement No. 333-55340

                                                        /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Birmingham, Alabama
March 28, 2002



                                      IV-28
<PAGE>
                                                                EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We have issued our report dated February 15, 2002, except for Notes 6B and 11 as
to which the date is March 21, 2002, accompanying the consolidated financial
statements included in the Annual Report of Refac and Subsidiaries on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2001. We hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of said report in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-76085)
pertaining to the Stock Option and Incentive Plan of Refac and Subsidiaries.



GRANT THORNTON LLP


New York, New York
March 29, 2002
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Micronetics, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended June 27, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Carl Lueders, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|               |  |  |  |        |  |                                                                            
|-------------- |  |  |  | ------ |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|August 7, 2009 |  |  |  |        |  | /S/ CARL LUEDERS                                                           
|               |  |  |  | Name:  |  | Carl Lueders                                                               
|               |  |  |  | Title: |  | Acting Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



27
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,826,119
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  292,031
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,254,035
<PP&E>                                             562
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,479,543
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          635,834
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             8
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,843,701
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,479,543
<SALES>                                        669,234
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               744,162
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                58,382
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                685,780
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            685,780
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   685,780
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.34
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 396 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 396

To enable each newly constituted Senate to carry out its responsibility 
  to determine the Rules of its Proceedings at the beginning of each 
                               Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 25, 2010

 Mr. Udall of New Mexico submitted the following resolution; which was 
         referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To enable each newly constituted Senate to carry out its responsibility 
  to determine the Rules of its Proceedings at the beginning of each 
                               Congress.

Whereas article I, section 5 of the United States Constitution provides that 
        ``Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings'';
Whereas it is a longstanding common law principle, upheld in Supreme Court 
        decisions, that one legislature cannot bind subsequent legislatures;
Whereas rule V of the Standing Rules of the Senate states that ``the Rules of 
        the Senate shall continue from one Congress to the next unless they are 
        changed as provided in these rules'';
Whereas rule XXII of the Standing Rules of the Senate requires an affirmative 
        vote of two-thirds of Senators present and voting to limit debate on a 
        measure or motion to amend the Senate Rules; and
Whereas rule V and rule XXII of the Standing Rules of the Senate, taken 
        together, can effectively deny the Senate the opportunity to exercise 
        its constitutional right to determine the Rules of its Proceedings under 
        article I, section 5, thus allowing one Congress to bind its successors: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That upon the expiration of the Standing Rules of the 
Senate at the Sine Die Adjournment of the 111th Congress, the Senate 
shall proceed in accordance with article I, section 5 of the 
Constitution to determine the Rules of its Proceedings by a simple 
majority vote.
                                 <all>
```