alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the
information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

This
14th day of November, 2006.



BY:

/s/ Pin Pin ChauPin Pin ChauChief Executive OfficerBY:

/s/ Thomas J. FlournoyThomas J. FlournoyChief Financial Officer




Page 27 of 27
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the amended annual report of Hipso Multimedia, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended November 30, 2008 (the“Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof, I, Alex Kestenbaum, CFO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Alex Kestenbaum

Alex KestenbaumCFODated: October 7, 2009

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to Hipso Multimedia, Inc. and will beretained by Hipso Multimedia, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.
1

Release Date: November 16, 2012

Table 17. Estimated truck transportation rates for coal, state to state, EIA data

Origin State Destination State 2008 2009 2010 2008-2010 2009-2010

Alabama Alabama W W W W W

Alabama Georgia - - W - -

Alabama Indiana W W - - -

Colorado Colorado W W W W W

Colorado Michigan - - W - -

Illinois Florida W - - - -

Illinois Illinois $8.16 $5.20 $3.75 -32.2 -27.9

Illinois Indiana W W - - -

Illinois Minnesota W W - - -

Illinois Missouri $23.60 $22.20 $14.77 -20.9 -33.5

Indiana Alabama - W - - -

Indiana Illinois - - W - -

Indiana Indiana $4.98 $3.96 $4.64 -3.5 17.2

Kansas Missouri W W W W W

Kentucky Florida W W W W W

Kentucky Georgia W - W W -

Kentucky Illinois $7.16 $7.62 W W W

Kentucky Kentucky $4.83 $9.80 $3.32 -17.1 -66.1

Kentucky Maryland - W - - -

Kentucky Minnesota W W - - -

Kentucky North Carolina - - $34.18 - -

Kentucky Pennsylvania - - W - -

Kentucky South Carolina - - $33.81 - -

Kentucky Tennessee W - W W -

Louisiana Louisiana W - - - -

Maryland Maryland W $12.49 $12.16 W -2.7

Maryland West Virginia W - - - -

Missouri Kansas W W W W W

Missouri Missouri W W W W W

Montana Montana W W W W W

North Dakota North Dakota W - - - -

Ohio Michigan W $19.87 $25.05 W 26.1

Ohio New York W $18.35 - - -

Ohio Ohio $8.13 $5.64 $9.87 10.1 75.1

Ohio Pennsylvania W W W W W

Ohio West Virginia W - - - -

Oklahoma Oklahoma - - W - -

Pennsylvania Maryland W $14.05 $14.27 W 1.6

Pennsylvania New York $12.35 $17.93 - - -

Pennsylvania Pennsylvania $6.35 $3.32 $4.62 -14.7 38.9

Pennsylvania West Virginia $8.90 $8.04 W W W

Texas Texas W W $8.21 W W

Nominal dollars per ton Annual percent change
2

Origin State Destination State 2008 2009 2010 2008-2010 2009-2010

Nominal dollars per ton Annual percent change

Utah California - W - - -

Utah Utah $2.55 $4.63 $5.28 43.7 13.9

Virginia Mississippi - W - - -

Virginia North Carolina W - W W -

Virginia Virginia W W - - -

West Virginia Alabama W - - - -

West Virginia Kentucky - W - - -

West Virginia Michigan W - - - -

West Virginia Mississippi - W - - -

West Virginia North Carolina - - $24.39 - -

West Virginia Ohio W - W W -

West Virginia Pennsylvania W - W W -

West Virginia South Carolina - - W - -

West Virginia West Virginia $7.07 $3.71 $3.79 -26.8 2.1

 - = No deliveries reported

W = Data Withheld

Source: Form EIA-923 Power Plant Operations Report
#### State v. Proctor

104,697

06/19/13

Granted; summarily reversed; remanded to Ct. of App. ..

47 Kan. App. 2d 889
# C_2022472EN.01004702.xml

| 12.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 472/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 472/47

---

Action brought on 27 October 2022 — moderne Stadt v EUIPO (DEUTZER HAFEN)

(Case T-656/22)

(2022/C 472/55)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: moderne Stadt Gesellschaft zur Förderung des Städtebaues und der Gemeindeentwicklung mbH (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: G. Simon and L. Daams, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: Application for the EU word mark DEUTZER HAFEN — Application No 18 316 145

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 August 2022 in Case R 2195/2021-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) in conjunction with Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) in conjunction with Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of the principle of equal treatment. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of the principle of equal treatment.

---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 72 (Tuesday, April 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 18357]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-9592]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs


Indian Gaming

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Approved Tribal-State Compact.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 11 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, 25 
U.S.C. Sec. 2710, the Secretary of the Interior shall publish, in the 
Federal Register, notice of approved Tribal-State Compacts for the 
purpose of engaging in Class III gaming on Indian lands. The Assistant 
Secretary--Indian Affairs, Department of the Interior, through her 
delegated authority, has approved the Tribal State Gaming Compact 
between Choctaw Nation and the State of Oklahoma, which was executed on 
December 6, 1996.

DATES: This action is effective April 15, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George T. Skibine, Director, Indian 
Gaming Management Staff, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Washington, D.C. 
20240, (202) 219-4068.

    Dated: April 3, 1997.
Ada E. Deer,
Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 97-9592 Filed 4-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-02-P
|                                                                                 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                   
|View History:                                                                    
|                                                                                 
|Illinois Natural Gas Deliveries to Electric Power Consumers  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                 
|                                                                                 
|Illinois Natural Gas Deliveries to Electric Power Consumers  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------ | ------ | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |        |        |         | 44,712  | 56,555  | 53,775 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 47,189  | 46,801  | 81,867  | 32,168  | 30,624 | 58,418 | 42,729  | 62,567  | 34,586  | 33,214 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 45,900  | 47,510  | 89,300  | 52,266  | 42,538 | 83,976 | 145,716 | 142,141 | 139,048 | 170,447
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 233,686 | 170,828 | 198,792 | 208,334 |        |        |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 691 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 691

To permit the collection of clothing, toys, food, and housewares during 
    the holiday season for charitable purposes in Senate buildings.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 30, 2010

   Mr. Reid (for himself and Mr. McConnell) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To permit the collection of clothing, toys, food, and housewares during 
    the holiday season for charitable purposes in Senate buildings.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. COLLECTION OF CLOTHING, TOYS, FOOD, AND HOUSEWARES DURING 
              THE HOLIDAY SEASON FOR CHARITABLE PURPOSES IN SENATE 
              BUILDINGS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of the rules 
or regulations of the Senate--
            (1) a Senator, officer, or employee of the Senate may 
        collect from another Senator, officer, or employee of the 
        Senate within Senate buildings nonmonetary donations of 
        clothing, toys, food, and housewares for charitable purposes 
        related to serving those in need or members of the Armed 
        Services and their families during the holiday season, if the 
        charitable purposes do not otherwise violate any rule or 
        regulation of the Senate or of Federal law; and
            (2) a Senator, officer, or employee of the Senate may work 
        with a nonprofit organization with respect to the delivery of 
        donations described in paragraph (1).
    (b) Expiration.--The authority provided by this resolution shall 
expire at the end of the 2nd session of the 111th Congress.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 10.68**

**FIRST AMENDMENT**

**TO THE**

**ALLIANCE GP, LLC**

**DIRECTORS ANNUAL RETAINER AND**

**DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN**

**WHEREAS**, Section 5.4 of the Alliance GP, LLC Directors Annual Retainer and Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) provides that it may be amended by the Board of Directors of Alliance GP, LLC; and 

**WHEREAS**, the Board of Directors desires to amend the Plan; 

**NOW, THEREFORE**, the Plan is hereby amended as follows: 

1. Section 1 is amended by addingthereto a new definition paragraph, to read as follows: 

“Designated Payment Date” means, with respect to Annual Retainer deferredwith respect to any calendar year beginning after December 31, 2007, the date specified in the Director’s deferral election for such year on which his or her Account established with respect to the deferrals for such year are to be paid(separate Accounts or subaccounts shall be maintained for deferrals for calendar years that are to be paid on different Designated Payment Dates). If the Director does not specify a Designated Payment Date in his or her deferral election, theDesignated Payment Date for such deferrals shall be the Director’s date of Termination. 

2. Section 4.2 is amended to read asfollows: 

4.2 Elective Deferrals. Before each year that begins after 2006 (with respect to an individual who firstbecomes a Director during a year that begins after 2006, before the date on which he first becomes a Director), a Director may elect to have the payment of all or a designated portion of his or her Annual Retainer for that year (or remaining part,as the case may be) deferred in Phantom Units until his or her Termination or, for years beginning after 2007, until the Designated Payment Date. The election shall be irrevocable for such year and shall be made on a form approved by the Committee.The deferrals shall be taken ratably from each quarterly payment of his Annual Retainer made that year. 

3. Section 4.5 is amended toread as follows: 

4.5 Payment of Accounts. Upon the earlier of a Director’s Termination or Designated PaymentDate, the Company shall pay to such Director (or to his or her Beneficiary in case of the Director’s death) an amount of cash equal to the Fair Market Value (on such Termination date or Designated 

Payment Date) of the Phantom Units credited to his or her Account. Payment of Accounts shall be made on the first business day following the Director’sTermination or Designated Payment Date, but not later than the end of the calendar year in which the Director’s Termination or Designated Payment Date occurs or, if later, the l5th day of the third month following such Termination or DesignatedPayment Date. 

**EXECUTED**and**EFFECTIVE**this 6th of December 2007. 

 
**ALLIANCE GP, LLC**By: /s/ R. Eberley DavisName: R. Eberley DavisTitle: Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
 

2
#### State v. Cunningham

108,158

11/20/13

Denied. ...

Unpublished
We have published data to provide evidence for the epoxy-ring opening.

Literature citations for specificity of reaction of epichlorohydrin with amines:

D.L. Heywood and B. Phillips, JACS, 1958, 80, 1257.

J.B. McKelvey, B.G. Webre, and R.R. Benerito, 1960, 25, 1424.

D.M. Burness, J. Org. Chem., 1964, 29, 1862.

J. Noguchi, et.al., US Patent 3,135,788 (1964)

H. Rutzen, et.al, US Patent 4,492,802 (1985)

R. Login, US Patent 4,734,277 (1988)
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 534 

Expressing support for designation of May 1, 2010, as ‘‘Silver Star Service 

Banner Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 19, 2010 

Mr. BOND (for himself and Mrs. MCCASKILL) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for designation of May 1, 2010, as 

‘‘Silver Star Service Banner Day’’. 

Whereas the Senate has always honored the sacrifices made 

by the wounded and ill members of the Armed Forces; 

Whereas the Silver Star Service Banner has come to represent the members of the Armed Forces and veterans 

who were wounded or became ill in combat in the wars 

fought by the United States; 

Whereas the Silver Star Families of America was formed to 

help the American people remember the sacrifices made 

by the wounded and ill members of the Armed Forces by 

designing and manufacturing Silver Star Service Banners 

and Silver Star Flags for that purpose; 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 534 ATS 

Whereas the sole mission of the Silver Star Families of 

America is to evoke memories of the sacrifices of members and veterans of the Armed Forces on behalf of the 

United States through the presence of a Silver Star Service Banner in a window or a Silver Star Flag flying; 

Whereas the sacrifices of members and veterans of the Armed 

Forces on behalf of the United States should never be 

forgotten; and 

Whereas May 1, 2010, is an appropriate date to designate as 

‘‘Silver Star Service Banner Day’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate designates May 1, 2010, 

2 as ‘‘Silver Star Service Banner Day’’ and calls upon the 

3 people of the United States to observe the day with appro4 priate programs, ceremonies, and activities. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
|                                                                                               
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                 
|View History:                                                                                  
|                                                                                               
|Tennessee Natural Gas Price Sold to Electric Power Consumers  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                               
|                                                                                               
|Tennessee Natural Gas Price Sold to Electric Power Consumers  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                               

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        | 6.38   | 3.22   | W      | W      | W      | W      | W      | W      | 4.70  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 5.04   | 4.62   | 2.90   | 3.83   | 4.64   | 2.74   | 2.61   | 3.05   | 3.17   | 2.85  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2.44   | 3.64   | 5.84   | 2.77   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### State v. Swisher

110,148

02/18/2016

Denied.

Unpublished
Electronically Filed 

Supreme Court 

SCWC-30681 

27-JAN-2012 

08:25 AM 

NO. SCWC-30681
 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I 

STATE OF HAWAI'I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee, 


vs.
 

STEPHEN P. FORMAN, also known as Brazil,


Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.
 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
 

(ICA NO. 30681; CR. NO. 09-1-0987)
 

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI


(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy, and McKenna, JJ.)
 

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Stephen P. Forman’s
 

application for writ of certiorari filed on December 21, 2011, is
 

hereby rejected. 


DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, January 27, 2012. 

Jefferson S. Willard 

on the application for


petitioner/defendantappellant.
 

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald


/s/ Paula A. Nakayama


/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.
 

/s/ James E. Duffy, Jr.
 

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
#### Williams v. State

108,189

10/28/13

Denied. ...

Unpublished
#### State v. Barton

106,219

08/23/13

Denied

Unpublished
----

Exhibit 32.1 

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 

In connection with the annual report of Corriente ResourcesInc. (the "Registrant") on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2007, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), Kenneth R. Shannon, as Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, andDarryl F. Jones, as Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, each herebycertifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that: 

(1) 

The Report fully complies withthe requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and 

(2) 

The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Registrant. 

| /S/ KENNETH R. SHANNON |
|------------------------|
| By:                    | Kenneth R. Shannon |
| Title:                 | Chief Executive Officer |
| March 26, 2008         |
|                   |   |
|                   |   |
|                   |   |
|                   |   |
| /S/ DARRYL F. JONES    |
| By:                    | Darryl F. Jones |
| Title:                 | Chief Financial Officer |
| March 26, 2008         |

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent requiredby the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Registrant forpurposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. 

----