alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



(a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;(c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based upon
such evaluation; and(d)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and(b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 /s/ James L. Hambrick

James L. Hambrick
Chief Executive Officer and President
November 9, 2007
#### State v. Drach

105,837

07/30/13

Denied.

Unpublished
#### State v. Abrams

111,396

09/14/2015

Denied. ..

Unpublished
EXHIBIT - 99.1
--------------



                                  CERTIFICATION


     I, James C. Mavel, the Chairman,  Chief Executive  Officer and President of
Scan-Optics,  Inc.  (the  "Company")  certify,  pursuant  to Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (i) the Annual  Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended
         December 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
         of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (ii)  the  information   contained  in  such  Quarterly  Report  fairly
         presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
         of operations of the Company.


                                               By:   / ss/
  Date       March 26, 2003                   ---------------------------
  --------------------------                     James C. Mavel
                                               Chairman, Chief Executive
                                                 Officer and President
# Table 7.10

# RSE 7.10

# Microsoft_Word_Document1.docx

# image1.emf

# Microsoft_Word_Document2.docx

# image2.emf
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 289 

Encouraging the people of the United States to reflect on and remember 

the integrity and courage of the 6,135 Christian men and women of 

Poland who acted to save their Jewish countrymen and countrywomen 

from extermination by Nazi Germany. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 25, 2009 

Mr. SPECTER submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Relations 

RESOLUTION 

Encouraging the people of the United States to reflect on 

and remember the integrity and courage of the 6,135 

Christian men and women of Poland who acted to save 

their Jewish countrymen and countrywomen from extermination by Nazi Germany. 

Whereas the year 2009 marks the 70th anniversary of the 

start of World War II, a war that should be remembered 

for introducing the world to the repulsive and unprecedented barbarism and cruelty of Nazi Germany; 

Whereas Poland was the first country attacked and enslaved 

by the government and armed forces of Nazi Germany as 

part of the methodical extermination of European Jewry 

by Nazi Germany; 


PWALKER on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 289 IS 

Whereas 6,135 Christian men and women of Poland acted 

with great integrity and courage, risking their lives and 

the lives of their families, to save their Jewish countrymen and countrywomen from the barbarism and extermination of the Nazis; 

Whereas the 6,135 Christian men and women of Poland who 

acted to save their Jewish countrymen and countrywomen 

did so in spite of the threat of their immediate execution 

and the execution of their families, a threat that people 

in no other country in Nazi-occupied Europe had to endure; and 

Whereas the 6,135 Christian men and women of Poland who 

acted to save their Jewish countrymen and countrywomen 

represent approximately 27 percent of the ‘‘Righteous 

Among the Nations’’ honored by Yad Vashem in the Republic of Israel: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate encourages the people of 

2 the United States to reflect on and remember the integrity 

3 and courage of the 6,135 Christian men and women of 

4 Poland who acted to save their Jewish countrymen and 

5 countrywomen from extermination by Nazi Germany. 

Æ 


PWALKER on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
No. 12-6152.

#### Hewlett *v.*Holder, Attorney General, et al.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<CIK> 0000820047
<NAME> FMG RITA RANCH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                             519
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         350,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 350,519
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,762
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     335,757
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   350,519
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                25,937
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (25,937)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (25,937)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-27-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-27-1999
<CASH>                                           1,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  264,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    34,000
<INVENTORY>                                  2,040,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,402,000
<PP&E>                                         156,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 133,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,190,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          933,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          490,000
<PREFERRED>                                    112,000
<COMMON>                                         6,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   412,000
<SALES>                                        583,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,302,000
<CGS>                                          312,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  697,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              99,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
        



</TABLE>
#### PHILIP A. SEGNERI, JR. *v.*FAIRFIELD VILLAGE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION ET AL.

(AC 34461)

DiPentima, C. J., and Sheldon and Schaller, Js.

Argued May 22

officially released June 11, 2013

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed.
|                                                                                          
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                            
|View History:                                                                             
|                                                                                          
|Percent of Commercial Natural Gas Deliveries in Hawaii Represented by the Price  (Percent)
|                                                                                          
|                                                                                          
|Percent of Commercial Natural Gas Deliveries in Hawaii Represented by the Price  (Percent)
|                                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 100    | 100    | 100    | 100    | 100    | 100    | 100    | 100    | 100    | 100   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 100    | 100    | 100    | 100    | 100    | 100    | 100    | 100    | 100    | 100   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 100    | 100    | 100    | 100    | 100    | 100    | 100    | 100    | 100    | 100   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 100    | 100    | 100    | 100    |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Dulcin Izmir Corporation (the "Company"),
hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended August 31, 2006 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                 /s/Maria Camila Maz
                                 ----------------------
                                 Maria Camila Maz
                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                 Chief Financial Officer

December 11, 2006
NUMBER 13

- 1 2

- 00 091

- CR



### COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

MARISSA ANN MARTINEZ

, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On a ppeal from the 156 th District Court

of Bee County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez , Benavides, and Perk es

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Marissa Ann Martinez , by and through h er attorney, has filed a motion to

dismiss h er appeal because s he no longer desires to prosecute it. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

.

42.2(a). Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to dismiss

pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and dismiss the appeal. Having2

dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be enterta ined,

and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 47.2(b).

D elivered and filed the

8th day of March, 2012

.
# C_2019111EN.01000101.xml

| 25.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 111/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 111/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8652 — Accuride/Mefro Wheels)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 111/01)

On 30 April 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8652. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8652. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
#### A. O. Lynch v. State.

155 So. 99.

Opinion Filed April 24, 1934.

Petition for Rehearing Denied June 15, 1.934.

*840
      *E. M. Norton,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Cary D. Landis,*Attorney General, and *Roy Campbell,*Assistant, for the State.

Per Curiam.

— In this case this Court finds itself unable to consider the arguments' made in the brief of plaintiff in error as to the insufficiency of the information upon which the conviction appealed from was had, because there is before this Court no properly prepared transcript of the record filed here as required by the law and rules of this Court. While the brief of the Attorney General in effect concedes the insufficiency of the count of the information upon which plaintiff in error was sentenced, yet without something more than a certified copy of the information and judgment (which is all that is before us) this Court is without jurisdiction to reverse the judgment, even though it may appear to be erroneous.

The writ of error is accordingly dismissed.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.
Exhibit 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES

Subsidiary

Jurisdiction of
Incorporation/Formation

Other
names d/b/aCrystal River Capital TRS Holdings, Inc.

DelawareCrystal River CDO 2005-1, Ltd.

Cayman IslandsCrystal River CDO 2005-1 LLC

DelawareCRC SPV 1, LLC

DelawareCRC SPV 2, LLC

DelawareCRC SPV 3, LLC

DelawareCrystal River Resecuritization 2006-1 Ltd.

Cayman IslandsCrystal River Resecuritization 2006-1 LLC

DelawareCrystal River Preferred Trust I

DelawareCRZ ABCP Financing LLC

DelawareCRZ Phoenix I LLC

DelawareCRZ Houston I GP LLC

DelawareCRZ Houston I LP

DelawareCRZ Arlington I GP LLC

DelawareCRZ Arlington I LP

Delaware


---



QuickLinks
**Exhibit10.34**

Addendum

To

Employment Agreement

This Addendum iseffective June 1, 2006 (“Addendum”) and modifies the Employment Agreement, asamended (“Agreement”) entered into effective June 2, 2005 between LawsonSoftware, Inc., a Delaware corporation (now known as Lawson Software Americas,Inc.) (“Company”) and Harry Debes (“Employee”), pursuant to Section 7.7 of theAgreement.  Capitalized terms nototherwise defined in this Addendum have the same respective meaning as definedin the Agreement.  The sections of theAgreement that are not expressly modified by this Addendum shall remain ineffect pursuant to their terms.

Section 3.9 of the Agreement is deleted in itsentirety and replaced with the following new Section 3.9:

3.9           Tier 1 Change in Control SeverancePay Plan Is Applicable to Employee. The Lawson Software, Inc. Executive Change in Control Severance Pay Planfor Tier 1 Executives (first adopted on January 17, 2005) will apply toEmployee on and after June 1, 2006 (the “Tier 1 CIC Plan”).  As stated in the Tier 1 CIC Plan, anyseverance payments under the Tier 1 CIC Plan will be reduced by the amount ofany severance payments under this Agreement.

This Addendum may be signed in counterpart and by fax,and is effective June 1, 2006.
| Lawson Software, Inc. |                         | Lawson Software Americas, Inc. |   |
|-----------------------|------------------------------|--------------------------------|--------|
|                  |                         |                           |   |   |   |
|                  |                         |                           |   |   |   |
| By                    | /s/ David R. Hubers          |                           | By     |   |   |   |
|                  | David R. Hubers,             | Title                          |   |   |   |
|                  | Compensation Committee Chair |                           |   |   |
|                  |                         |                           |   |
|                  |                         |                           |   |
|                  | /s/ Harry Debes              |                           |   |   |
|                  | Harry Debes                  |                           |   |   |
|                       |                              |                                |        |  |  |  |  |  |

 

----
No. 12-191.

#### Washington *v.*Stenson.

Sup. Ct. Wash. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*granted. Certiorari denied.
#### Requena v. Cline

111,040

07/27/2015

Denied. ,.

Unpublished
No. 11-10145.

#### Nickels *v.*Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction.

C. A. 8th Cir. Motion of petitioner to defer consideration of petition for writ of certiorari denied. Certiorari denied.