alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23

# INDEPENDENT
AUDITORS CONSENT

To the Board of Directors and Shareholder of 
     Kerzner International North America, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in Registration Statement No. 333-88854 of Kerzner International Limited on Form
F-3 of our report dated January 31, 2003, except with respect to the matter discussed in
the eighth paragraph of Note 10 to those financial statements, as to which the date is
February 7, 2003, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial
statement schedule (as it relates to 2002) of Kerzner International North America, Inc.
(the Company) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002 appearing in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2002. Such
report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs concerning the
Companys adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, and the application of procedures
relating to certain disclosures of financial statement amounts related to the 2001 and
2000 financial statements that were audited by other auditors who have ceased operations
and for which we have expressed no opinion or other form of assurance other than with
respect to such disclosures.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE
LLP

Parsippany, New Jersey
March 28, 2003
17568 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 69 / Thursday, April 10, 1997 / Rules and Regulations

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric

Administration

50 CFR Part 679

[Docket No. 961107312–7021–02; I.D.

040797A]

Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic

Zone Off Alaska; Pacific Ocean Perch

in the Western Aleutian District of the

Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),

Commerce.

ACTION: Closure.

SUMMARY: NMFS is closing directed

fishing for Pacific ocean perch in the

Western Aleutian District of the Bering

Sea and Aleutian Islands management

area (BSAI). This action is necessary to

prevent exceeding the 1997 total

allowable catch (TAC) of Pacific ocean

perch in this area.

EFFECTIVE DATE: 1200 hrs, Alaska local

time (A.l.t.), April 7, 1997, until 2400

hrs, A.l.t., December 31, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mary Furuness, 907–586-7228.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The

groundfish fishery in the BSAI exclusive

economic zone is managed by NMFS

according to the Fishery Management

Plan for the Groundfish Fishery of the

Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Area

(FMP) prepared by the North Pacific

Fishery Management Council under

authority of the Magnuson-Stevens

Fishery Conservation and Management

Act. Fishing by U.S. vessels is governed

by regulations implementing the FMP at

subpart H of 50 CFR part 600 and 50

CFR part 679.

The TAC of Pacific ocean perch for

the Western Aleutian District was

established by the Final 1997 Harvest

Specifications of Groundfish for the

BSAI (62 FR 7168, February 18, 1997) as

6,390 metric tons (mt). See

§ 679.20(c)(3)(iii).

In accordance with § 679.20 (d)(1), the

Administrator, Alaska Region, NMFS

(Regional Administrator), has

determined that the TAC for Pacific

ocean perch specified for the Western

Aleutian District will soon be reached.

Therefore, the Regional Administrator is

establishing a directed fishing

allowance of 4,790 mt, and is setting

aside the remaining 1,600 mt as bycatch

to support other anticipated groundfish

fisheries. In accordance with

§ 679.(d)(1)(iii), the Regional

Administrator finds that this directed

fishing allowance will soon be reached.

Consequently, NMFS is prohibiting

directed fishing for Pacific ocean perch

in the Western Aleutian District.

Maximum retainable bycatch amounts

for applicable gear types may be found

in the regulations at §§ 679.20(e) and (f).

Classification

This action is required by § 679.20

and is exempt from review under E.O.

12866.

Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

Dated: April 7, 1997.

Bruce Morehead,

Acting Director, Office of Sustainable

Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.

[FR Doc. 97–9324 Filed 4–7–97; 4:58 pm]

BILLING CODE 3510–22–F
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-4401

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JOE JOYNER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior

District Judge. (5:06-cr-00123-H-ALL)

Submitted: February 27, 2008 Decided: March 10, 2008

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas P. McNamara, Federal Public Defender, Stephen C. Gordon,

Assistant Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellant. George E. B. Holding, United States Attorney, Anne M.

Hayes, Banumathi Rangarajan, Assistant United States Attorneys,

Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM: 

Joe Clinton Joyner pleaded guilty to two counts of bank

robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) (2000). On appeal

Joyner contends his 156-month sentence is unreasonable. We affirm.

Appellate courts review sentences imposed by district

courts for reasonableness, applying an abuse of discretion

standard. Gall v. United States, 128 S. Ct. 586, 597 (2007). When

sentencing a defendant, a district court must: (1) properly

calculate the guidelines range; (2) determine whether a sentence

within that range serves the factors set out in 18 U.S.C.

§ 3553(a); (3) implement mandatory statutory limitations; and

(4) explain its reasons for selecting a sentence. United States v.

Green, 436 F.3d 449, 455-56 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct.

2309 (2006). A sentence within a correctly calculated advisory

guidelines range is presumptively reasonable. United States v.

Moreland, 437 F.3d 424, 433 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct.

2054 (2006); Rita v. United States, 127 S. Ct. 2456, 2462-69 (2007)

(upholding presumption of reasonableness for within-guidelines

sentence).

Our review of the record reveals no procedural or

substantive error with respect to Joyner’s 156-month sentence. The

sentencing court followed the required steps in sentencing Joyner:

(1) it properly calculated the guidelines range; (2) allowed both

parties an opportunity to argue for whatever sentence they deemed
- 3 -

appropriate; and (3) considered the § 3553(a) factors. See Gall,

128 S. Ct. at 596-97. The court considered counsel’s argument that

it should take into account in sentencing Joyner the fact that his

IQ is 68, in the mild mental retardation range. Moreover, Joyner

did not request a sentence outside of the guidelines, or a

particular sentence within the range. Under these circumstances,

Joyner cannot overcome the presumptive reasonableness of his

sentence within the guidelines range.

Accordingly, we affirm Joyner’s sentence. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32.1






CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






CERTIFICATE OF DIRECTOR




I, Annette Davis, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:




(i)        The accompanying annual report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(ii)        The information in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Golden Valley Development. (the “Company”).




Date: August 17, 2009
By:
/s/ Annette DavisAnnette DavisDirector/CFO




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 73 (Wednesday, April 16, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 18643]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-9767]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Office of Extramural Research; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of 
the Peer Review Oversight Group (PROG) on May 5, 1997, from 8:30 a.m. 
to 5:00 p.m., at the National Institutes of Health, Building 31, 
Conference Room 7, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, Maryland 20892. The 
meeting is open to the public, with attendance limited to space 
available.
    The discussions will focus on the integration of neuroscience 
reviews and the review of clinical research applications.
    The meeting agenda and roster of committee members will be 
available on the World Wide Web via the NIH Home Page (<a href="http://
www.nih.gov">http://
www.nih.gov</a>.grants/) or from Dr. Peggy McCardle, Executive Secretary, 
PROG, and Special Assistant to the Deputy Director for Extramural 
Research, OD, NIH, Building 1, Room 150, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, 
(301) 402-2246. Individuals who plan to attend the meeting and need 
special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other 
special accommodations, should contact Dr. McCardle by April 28, 1997.

    Dated: April 10, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-9767 Filed 4-15-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Regular Totals (Holders)

Airport = EWR

Holder = 0001(Exclude)

Status Date = 01/01/2012 (History & Current)

02/23/2015 07:50:48

Query Parameters:
02/23/2015 07:50:48

Carrier

Regular Totals (Holders)

Slots Held less than 5 days are Excluded Excludes FAA Held PF7 Status Date = 01/01/2012 (History & Current)

EWR

AAL AMERICAN AIRLINES 54 

ACA AIR CANADA 24

AFR AIR FRANCE 2

AIC AIR INDIA 2

ASA ALASKA AIRLINES 4

AVI L'AVION/OPENSKIES 4

AZA ALITALIA 2

BAW BRITISH AIRWAYS 6 

CKS KALITTA FLYING SERVICES (AMERICAN INT'L 2

COA CONTINENTAL AIRLINES 23

CSQ IBC AIRWAYS 2

DAL DELTA AIR LINES 64

DLH DEUTSCHE LUFTHANSA 8

ELY EL AL ISRAEL AIRLINES 1

FDX FED EX 8

JAI JET AIRWAYS 2

JBU JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORP. 28

POE PORTER AIRLINES 20

QTR QATAR AIRWAYS 2

RPA REPUBLIC AIRLINE 8 

SAS SCANDINAVIAN AIRLINES 4

SIA SINGAPORE AIRLINES LIMITED 2

SWR SWISS INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES (SWISSAIR 2

TAP TAP-AIR PORTUGAL 2

TRS AIRTRAN AIRWAYS (new 3ltr eff 03/22/03) 13

UAL UNITED AIRLINES 891

UPS UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 2

USA US AIRWAYS 31

VIR VIRGIN ATLANTIC AIR 4

WJA WESTJET 2

Page 2
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Micronetics, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 26,
2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), David Robbins, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|               |  |        |  |                                                                    
|-------------- |  | ------ |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|August 2, 2010 |  |        |  | /S/ DAVID ROBBINS                                                  
|               |  | Name:  |  | David Robbins                                                      
|               |  | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Executive Officer)

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the
extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
EXHIBIT 4(q)





             English Summary of Land Use Right Transfer Agreement

Date:
-----
September 25, 2001.

Parties:
--------
China-Singapore Suzhou Industrial Park Development Co., Ltd. (the "Transferor").
AU Optronics (Suzhou) Corp. (the "Transferee").

The Transfer:
-------------
The land use right regarding the government-owned land containing 160,005.65
square meters, located on the China-Singapore Suzhou Industrial Park, Suzhou.

Term of Transfer:
-----------------
A period of 50 years commencing from the date of issuance of land use right
certificate. The Agreement may be renewed with a 12-month advance application.

Price:
------
The price shall be eighty-two Renminbi dollars and eighty cents (RMB82.80) per
square meter.

The total amount of price shall be thirteen million two hundred forty-eight
thousand four hundred sixty-seven Renminbi dollars and eighty-two cents
(RMB13,248,467.82), which shall be paid in four installments before June 10,
2002.

The Transferee will receive the land use right certificate when the Transferor
has received the price in full.

Termination by Transferor
-------------------------
If the Transferee fails to pay the price and/or interest (if any) in the manner
as requested by the Transferor, the Transferor shall:
a. unilaterally terminate this Agreement with written notice; or
b. re-transfer or dispose of the land use right at its discretion.

Miscellaneous
-------------
The Transferor shall complete the transfer procedures within three weeks upon
receipt of the full price and/or interest (if any) or it shall pay a daily
compensation of RMB2,000 for any delay in relation thereto.

Except for the business tax, land value-added tax (if any) and 50% of the
notary fee which shall be paid by the Transferor, all other relevant taxes and
fees shall be borne by Transferee.


                                       1
<PAGE>


The Transferor agrees to reserve a parcel of land of 160,000 square meters
adjacent to the currently transferred land for the Transferee at a purchase
price of eighty-two Renminbi dollars and eighty cents (RMB82.80) per square
meter for two years from the date hereof and the Transferee shall pay 5% of the
total price within 21 days after the execution of this Agreement as the deposit
and pay the remaining amount of the price within the two-year period to
purchase such land.

The reclamation works on the transferred land shall be carried out by the
Transferee and the relevant fees shall be borne by the Transferor. The
Transferor shall provide infrastructural facilities for the supply of such
utilities as electricity, gas and water to the Transferee.

Should any dispute arise from this Agreement, the Transferor and the Transferee
agree that the arbitration of Shanghai branch of China International Economic
and Trade Arbitration Commission shall be final and conclusive.


                                       2
Exhibit 31.1





CERTIFICATIONS





I, Bruce Capra, certify that:





1.   I have reviewed the report being filed on Form 10-K by Recycle Tech, Inc.





2.   Based on my knowledge, the report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the  statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by the report;





3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in the report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of Recycle Tech, Inc.  as of, and for, the periods presented


in the report;





4.   I and the other certifying officer are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Regulation 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) for Recycle Tech, Inc. and have:





i.   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to Recycle Tech, Inc., including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made  known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which the periodic reports are being
prepared;





ii.  Evaluated the effectiveness of Recycle Tech, Inc.'s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of the report ("Evaluation Date"); and





iii. Presented in the report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;





5.   I and the other certifying officer have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Recycle Tech, Inc. auditors and the audit committee of the board of directors (or persons fulfilling the equivalent function):





i.   All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect Recycle Tech, Inc.'s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified Recycle Tech, Inc.'s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and





ii.  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuer's internal controls; and





6.   I and the other certifying officer have indicated in the report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard
to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.





Date:September 11, 2009


/s/
Bruce Capra


Bruce
Capra, Chief Executive Officer
#### Lemon v. State

105,432

04/08/13

Denied.

Unpublished
No. 12-55.

#### Fisher, Individually and as Successor in Interest to Decedent Fisher, et al. *v.*Halliburton et al.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 73 (Thursday, April 16, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 18898]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10084]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. UL97-11-000]

PacifiCorp; Notice Rejecting Request for Rehearing

April 10, 1998.
    On February 12, 1998, the Acting Director, Office of Hydropower 
Licensing, issued an order finding licensing not required for a storage 
reservoir located on Bear Lake, in Idaho. 82 FERC para.62,100. On March 
13, 1998, LOVE Bear Lake, Inc., filed a request for rehearing of this 
order with the Commission.
    Under Section 313(a) of the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 
Sec. 825l(a), a request for rehearing may be filed only by a party to 
the proceeding. In order to become a party to any Commission 
proceeding, an interested person must file a motion to intervene 
pursuant to Rule 214 of the Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 
385.214. LOVE Bear Lake, Inc., did not file a motion to intervene in 
this proceeding. Consequently, its request for rehearing must be 
rejected.
    This notice constitutes final agency action. Requests for rehearing 
by the Commission of this rejection notice must be filed within 30 days 
of the date of issuance of this notice pursuant to 18 CFR 385.713.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-10084 Filed 4-15-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
EXHIBIT 12.2
   1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Copa Holdings, S.A.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;
 4.
    
    The companys other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:
     5.
    
    The companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors
and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
    /s/ Victor Vial
Victor VialChief Financial Officer