19714 Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 76 /Tuesday, April 21, 1998 / Notices

Final Results of Review

As a result of this review, we find that

the following margins exist for the

period February 1, 1996, through

January 31, 1997:

Manufacturer/

exporter Period Margin(percent)

Panchmahal .. 2/1/96–1/31/97 0

Facor ............. 2/1/96–1/31/97 0

Parties to the proceeding may request

disclosure within five days of the date

of publication of this notice. The results

of this review shall be the basis for the

assessment of antidumping duties on

entries of merchandise covered by the

review and for future deposits of

estimated duties for the manufacturers/

exporters subject to this review. We

have calculated an importer-specific

duty assessment rate based on the ratio

of the total amount of antidumping

duties calculated for the examined sales

made during the period of review

(‘‘POR’’) to the total value of subject

merchandise entered during the POR.

The Department will issue appraisement

instructions directly to the Customs

Service.

Furthermore, the following deposit

requirements will be effective for all

shipments of the subject merchandise

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,

for consumption on or after the

publication date of these final results of

this new shipper administrative review,

as provided by section 751(a)(1) of the

Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for the

reviewed companies will be the rates

established in the final results of this

new shipper review; (2) for companies

not covered in this review, but covered

in previous reviews or the original lessthan-fair-value investigation, the cash

deposit rate will continue to be the

company-specific rate published for the

most recent period; (3) if the exporter is

not a firm covered in this review, a prior

review, or the original investigation, but

the manufacturer is, the cash deposit

rate will be the most recent rate

established for the manufacturer of the

merchandise; and (4) if neither the

exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm

covered in this or any previous review

or the original investigation, the cash

deposit rate will be the ‘‘all others’’ rate

of 12.45 percent established in the final

determination of sales at less than fair

value (59 FR 66915, December 28,

1994).

These deposit requirements will

remain in effect until publication of the

final results of the next administrative

review.

This notice also serves as a final

reminder to importers of their

responsibility under 19 CFR 353.26 to

file a certificate regarding the

reimbursement of antidumping duties

prior to liquidation of the relevant

entries during this review period.

Failure to comply with this requirement

could result in the Secretary’s

presumption that reimbursement of

antidumping duties occurred and the

subsequent assessment of double

antidumping duties.

This notice also serves as a reminder

to parties subject to administrative

protective orders (‘‘APOs’’) of their

responsibility concerning the

disposition of proprietary information

disclosed under APO in accordance

with 19 CFR 353.34(d)(1). Timely

written notification of the return/

destruction of APO materials or

conversion to judicial protective order is

hereby requested. Failure to comply

with the regulations and the terms of an

APO is a sanctionable violation.

This new shipper review and notice

are in accordance with sections

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act (19

U.S.C. 1675(a)(1)), 19 CFR 353.22.

Dated: April 13, 1998.

Joseph A. Spetrini,

Acting Assistant Secretary for Import

Administration.

[FR Doc. 98–10415 Filed 4–20–98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

The Ohio State University, et al.; Notice

of Consolidated Decision on

Applications for Duty-Free Entry of

Electron Microscopes

This is a decision consolidated

pursuant to Section 6(c) of the

Educational, Scientific, and Cultural

Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub.

L. 89–651, 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part

301). Related records can be viewed

between 8:30 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. in

Room 4211, U.S. Department of

Commerce, 14th and Constitution

Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C.

Docket Number: 97–103. Applicant:

The Ohio State University, Columbus,

OH 43210. Instrument: Electron

Microscope, Model CM200.

Manufacturer: Philips, The Netherlands.

Intended Use: See notice at 63 FR 5364,

February 2, 1998. Order Date: July 10,

1997.

Docket Number: 98–005. Applicant:

University of California, Davis, Davis,

CA 95618. Instrument: Electron

Microscope, Model LEEM III.

Manufacturer: Elmitec

Elektronenmikroskopie GmbH,

Germany. Intended Use: See notice at 63

FR 11870, March 11, 1998. Order Date:

December 3, 1996.

Docket Number: 98–012. Applicant:

University of New Orleans, New

Orleans, LA 70148. Instrument: Electron

Microscope, Model JEM–2010.

Manufacturer: JEOL, Ltd., Japan.

Intended Use: See notice at 63 FR

12451, March 13, 1998. Order Date:

January 8, 1998.

Docket Number: 98–014. Applicant:

University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, Eau

Claire, WI 54702–4004. Instrument:

Electron Microscope, Model JEM–2010.

Manufacturer: JEOL, Ltd., Japan.

Intended Use: See notice at 63 FR

12452, March 13, 1998. Order Date:

December 1, 1997.

Comments: None received. Decision:

Approved. No instrument of equivalent

scientific value to the foreign

instrument, for such purposes as these

instruments are intended to be used,

was being manufactured in the United

States at the time the instruments were

ordered. Reasons: Each foreign

instrument is a conventional

transmission electron microscope

(CTEM) and is intended for research or

scientific educational uses requiring a

CTEM. We know of no CTEM, or any

other instrument suited to these

purposes, which was being

manufactured in the United States

either at the time of order of each

instrument or at the time of receipt of

application by the U.S. Customs

Service.

Frank W. Creel,

Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff.

[FR Doc. 98–10412 Filed 4–20–98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

University of Nebraska-Lincoln; Notice

of Decision on Application for DutyFree Entry of Scientific Instrument

This decision is made pursuant to

Section 6(c) of the Educational,

Scientific, and Cultural Materials

Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89–

651, 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301).

Related records can be viewed between

8:30 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. in Room 4211,

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and

Constitution Avenue, N.W.,

Washington, D.C.

Docket Number: 97–102. Applicant:

University of Nebraska-Lincoln,

Lincoln, NE 68588–0347. Instrument:

Scanning Acoustic Microscope, Model

KSI SAM 2000. Manufacturer: Kramer

Scientific Instruments, Germany.