alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 70 (Friday, April 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17828-17829]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-9444]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals to Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or to Acquire Companies that are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation      Y, (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire 
or control voting securities or assets of a company that engages either 
directly or through a subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking 
activity that is listed in Sec.  225.25 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.25) 
or that the Board has determined by Order to be closely related to 
banking and permissible for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise 
noted, these activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. Once the notice has been accepted for processing, it will 
also be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of 
Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the 
question whether the proposal complies with the standards of section 4 
of the BHC Act.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than May 8, 1997.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Lois Berthaume, Vice President) 
104 Marietta Street, NW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-2713:
    1. P.C.B. Bancorp, Inc., Largo, Florida; to acquire Anchor Savings 
Bank, F.S.B., St. Petersburg, Florida, and thereby engage in operating 
a savings association, pursuant to Sec.  225.25(b)(9) of the Board's 
Regulation Y. The proposed activities will be conducted throughout the 
State of Florida.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Randall C. Sumner, Vice 
President) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63102-2034:
    1. Mercantile Bancorporation Inc., St. Louis, Missouri, and 
Ameribanc, Inc., St. Louis, Missouri; to acquire Roosevelt Bank, 
Chesterfield, Missouri, and Roosevelt Mortgage Company, Kansas City, 
Missouri, and thereby engage in the operation of a federal savings 
bank, pursuant to Sec.  225.25(b)(9) of the Board's Regulation Y; and 
in mortgage banking activities, pursuant to Sec.  225.25(b)(1) of the 
Board's Regulation Y.


[[Page 17829]]


    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 8, 1997.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-9444 Filed 4-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the Trustee of Marine Petroleum Trust does hereby certify, to such persons knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2013 (the Form 10-Q) of Marine Petroleum Trust
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of Marine Petroleum Trust as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.



|                                                                                                                                                                                               
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Ron E. Hooper                                                                                                                                                                              
|Ron E. Hooper                                                                                                                                                                                  
|Senior Vice President Royalty Management on behalf of U.S. Trust, Bank of America Private Wealth Management, not in its individual capacity but solely as the Trustee of Marine
Petroleum Trust

Dated: November 12, 2013

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Marine Petroleum Trust and will be retained by Marine Petroleum Trust and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuant to
Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the
Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of Marine Petroleum Trust, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.
#### State v. Logan

112,355

07/07/2016

Denied.

Unpublished
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0092

IN THE MATTER OF:

F.S.,

Respondent and Appellant. 

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including July 10, 2020, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Laurie McKinnon

Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 4 2020

06/04/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0092
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 498 

Designating April 2010 as ‘‘National Child Abuse Prevention Month’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 22, 2010 

Ms. COLLINS (for herself and Mr. DODD) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

APRIL 27, 2010 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating April 2010 as ‘‘National Child Abuse Prevention 

Month’’. 

Whereas, in 2008, approximately 772,000 children were determined to be victims of abuse or neglect; 

Whereas, in 2008, an estimated 1,740 children died as a result of abuse or neglect; 

Whereas, in 2008, an estimated 80 percent of the children 

who died due to abuse or neglect were under the age of 

4; 

Whereas, in 2008, of the children under the age of 4 who 

died due to abuse or neglect, the majority were under the 

age of 1; 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 498 ATS 

Whereas abused or neglected children have a higher risk in 

adulthood for developing health problems, including alcoholism, depression, drug abuse, eating disorders, obesity, 

suicide, and certain chronic diseases; 

Whereas a National Institute of Justice study indicated that 

abused or neglected children— 

(1) are 11 times more likely to be arrested for criminal behavior as juveniles; and 

(2) are 2.7 times more likely to be arrested for violent and criminal behavior as adults; 

Whereas an estimated 1⁄3 of abused or neglected children 

grow up to abuse or neglect their own children; 

Whereas providing community-based services to families impacted by child abuse or neglect may be far less costly 

than— 

(1) the emotional and physical damage inflicted on 

children who have been abused or neglected; 

(2) providing to abused or neglected children services, including child protective, law enforcement, court, 

foster care, or health care services; or 

(3) providing treatment to adults recovering from 

child abuse; and 

Whereas child abuse or neglect has long-term economic and 

societal costs: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates April 2010 as ‘‘National Child 

3 Abuse Prevention Month’’; 

4 (2) recognizes and applauds the national and 

5 community organizations that work to promote 

6 awareness about child abuse or neglect, including by 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
3 

SRES 498 ATS 

1 identifying risk factors and developing prevention 

2 strategies; 

3 (3) supports the proclamation issued by Presi4 dent Obama declaring April 2010 as ‘‘National 

5 Child Abuse Prevention Month’’; and 

6 (4) should— 

7 (A) increase public awareness of prevention 

8 programs relating to child abuse or neglect; and 

9 (B) continue to work with the States to re10 duce the incidence of child abuse or neglect in 

11 the United States. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT
32.1**
 ****
 ****
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**
 ****
 ****
 **18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 ****
 ****
 **AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**
 ****
 ****
 **OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 ****
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Longview Fibre Company (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended January 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-Q/A"), I, R.
H. Wollenberg, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)
    The
      Form 10-Q/A fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
      and
 (2)
    The
      information contained in the Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
  Dated:
June 8, 2005
   R. H.
WOLLENBERG
   R. H.
WOLLENBERG
   President,
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
No. 12-6070.

#### Lewis *v.*Washington.

Ct. App. Wash. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See *Martin*v. *District of Columbia Court of Appeals,*506 U. S. 1 (1992) *(per*curiam).
**Exhibit 99.4**
**I, Peter Voser, certify that:**1.I have reviewed this Amendment No. 2 on    Form 20-F/A of The “Shell” Transport and Trading    Company, p.l.c.;     2.Based on my knowledge, this Amendment No. 2 does    not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to    state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in    light of the circumstances under which such statements were    made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this    Amendment No. 2;     3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,    and other financial information included in this Amendment No.    2, fairly present in all material respects the financial    condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company    as of, and for, the periods presented in this Amendment No. 2;     4.The company’s other certifying officer and I    are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure    controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act    Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:    
 (a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,    or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed    under our supervision, to ensure that material information    relating to the company, including its consolidated    subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those    entities, particularly during the period in which this Amendment    No. 2 is being prepared;      (b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s    disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this    Amendment No. 2 our conclusions about the effectiveness of the    disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period    covered by this report based on such evaluation; and      (c)Disclosed in this Amendment No. 2 any change in    the company’s internal control over financial reporting    that occurred during the period covered by the Amendment    No. 2 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely    to materially affect, the company’s internal control over    financial reporting;    
5.The company’s other certifying officer and I    have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal    control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors    and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors    (or persons performing the equivalent functions):    
 (a)All significant deficiencies and material    weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over    financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely    affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize    and report financial information; and      (b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves    management or other employees who have a significant role in the    company’s internal control over financial reporting.    
Dated March 3, 2005
/s/ Peter Voser-----------------------------------------------------**Peter Voser****Chief Financial Officer** **E 12**      Exhibits 20-F/A (Amendment No. 2) 2002
07/19/2012 18:22 FAX 2024935142**~** 001/001 FAA**~** OMS

Direct Dial: 435.oJ4.J5Jo Direct Fax: 4.15.<iJ4

. .1SO::i c-mad:**tcrtlcr~~!)n(f!t~k** ywt!sl.\:2'!.1 

# RECEIVED .JUL - 2 21112 

# HEARING DOCKET

VIA**F't:D~:RAL** F.XPRESS Federal A 

### vi at 

### ion Administration 

### ATTN: Hearing Docket Clerk, .t\GC-430 Wilbttr Wright Building- 

### Suite 

### 2WI 000 800 

### lnclcpcndcnt;t: A**vcnu~** SW 

### Washington, DC 20591 Rc:**c~-.se** 

### No. 

### 2011NM060005 

### Dear .Sii'/Madam: June 29,2012

The Final 

### Notice of Proposed Civil 

### Penalty iu the 

### abovc-rererence case 

### was received in our officx on June 25, 2011. Pursuant 

### to

### ~ 13.16 (e) (2) (ii) of 

### Fcd(;ral Air Regulations, Sky West 

### Airlines hereby requests a hearing on this matter.**~~erely,** 

# luc.
Todd C. Emcr**--~** ... --· 

### Director- 

### Government and Legal Affairs 

### TCE/jb

cc: Jeffrey M. Harper 0
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-7032

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

MYRON B. AULL, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

No. 08-7035

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

MYRON B. AULL, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District 

of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District 

Judge. (2:99-cr-00543-DCN-1; 2:02-cv-02054-DCN; 2:00-cr-00950-

DCN-1; 2:02-cv-02055-DCN) 

Submitted: November 13, 2008 Decided: November 19, 2008 

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. 
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Myron B. Aull, Appellant Pro Se. Sean Kittrell, Assistant United 

States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 

2 
3 

PER CURIAM: 

Myron B. Aull seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying relief on his motion for reconsideration of the 

denial of his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2008) motion. The 

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues 

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this 

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find 

that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district 

court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural 

ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. 

Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. 

McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 

683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the 

record and conclude that Aull has not made the requisite 

showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability 

and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Exhibit 12

Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

(In Millions Except Ratios)



|                                                      |  |      |         |      |   |         |  |      |         |      |   |       |  |   |      
|----------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ------- | ---- | - | ------- |  | ---- | ------- | ---- | - | ----- |  | - | -----
|YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,                               |  | 2006 |         | 2005 |   | 2004    |  | 2003 |         | 2002
|EARNINGS                                              |  |      |         |      |   |         |  |      |         |      |   |       |  |   |      
|Income from Continuing Operations before Income Taxes |  | $    | 1,239.5 |      | $ | 985.7   |  | $    | 892.9   |      | $ | 380.1 |  | $ | 299.5
|Total Fixed Charges                                   |  |      | 91.4    |      |   | 88.6    |  |      | 108.2   |      |   | 127.5 |  |   | 132.8
|                                                      |  |      |         |      |   |         |  |      |         |      |   |       |  |   |      
|Total Earnings                                        |  |      | 1,330.9 |      |   | 1,074.3 |  |      | 1,001.1 |      |   | 507.6 |  |   | 432.3
|                                                      |  |      |         |      |   |         |  |      |         |      |   |       |  |   |      
|FIXED CHARGES                                         |  |      |         |      |   |         |  |      |         |      |   |       |  |   |      
|Interest                                              |  |      | 91.4    |      |   | 88.6    |  |      | 108.2   |      |   | 127.1 |  |   | 131.5
|Amortization of Deferred Debt Expense                 |  |      |        |      |   |        |  |      |        |      |   | 0.4   |  |   | 1.3  
|                                                      |  |      |         |      |   |         |  |      |         |      |   |       |  |   |      
|Total Fixed Charges                                   |  | $    | 91.4    |      | $ | 88.6    |  | $    | 108.2   |      | $ | 127.5 |  | $ | 132.8
|                                                      |  |      |         |      |   |         |  |      |         |      |   |       |  |   |      
|RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                    |  |      | 14.56   |      |   | 12.13   |  |      | 9.25    |      |   | 3.98  |  |   | 3.26 
|                                                      |  |      |         |      |   |         |  |      |         |      |   |       |  |   |      



X-5
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Tank Sports, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-KSB for the period ended February 28, 2006, as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jing Jing Long, in
      my
      capacity as Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that:





The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Date:
        October
        19, 2006


/s/
      Jing Jing Long


Jing
      Jing
      Long


Principal
      Executive Officer
# C_2019311EN.01000101.xml

| 16.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 311/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 311/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9142 — REWE/Lekkerland)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 311/01)

On 7 August 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9142. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9142. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO 17 CFR 240.13a-14  PROMULGATED UNDER  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Craig J. Laurie, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Crystal River Capital, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and we have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



| |  | /s/CRAIG J. LAURIECraig J. Laurie Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 13, 2008

---



QuickLinks