Mo -/6,3 

STATE OF MISSOURI Matt Blunt, Governor . Doyle Childers, Director 

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 

www.dnr.mo.gov 

FEB 2 2 2007 

Mr. John B. Askew 

Regional Administrator 

U.S. EPA, Region VII 

901 North Fifth Street 

Kansas City, KS 66 101 

RECEIVED 

FEB 2 7 2007 

APDB 

Dear Mr. Askew: 

The Missouri Air Conservation Commission has recently revised or promulgated 

the following air quality plan(s) contained in the Missouri State Implementation 

Plan (SIP) . The following is enclosed for your review : 

Plan for Implementation, Maintenance and Enforcement of National Ambient Air 

Quality Standard (NAAQS) 

This state of Missouri Plan for Implementation, Maintenance and Enforcement of 

National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) has been written to fulfill the 

requirements of Section 110 of the Federal Clean Air Act Amendments (CAAA) of 

1990. Section 110 of the CAAA requires that each state submit to the 

Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) a plan for the 

implementation, maintenance and enforcement of NAAQS in every air quality 

region within the state . 

Any changes that are necessary as a result of additional guidance the EPA 

publishes after this submittal will be covered as a separate revision at a later date. 

In the plan, beginning on page 12, Missouri has addressed EPA's finding made in 

April 2005 that states failed to make statutorily required plan submissions 

addressing 110 (a)(2)(D)(i) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) pertaining to interstate 

transport. 

0 
Mr. John B. Askew 

Page Two 

The commission adopted the enclosed plan action(s) on February 1, 2007 after 

considering comments received at public hearing . The commission has full legal 

authority to develop the Missouri State Implementation Plan pursuant to Section 

643 .050 of the Missouri Air Conservation Law. The state followed all applicable 

administrative procedures in proposing and adopting the plan action(s) . Enclosed 

are the required SIP submittal elements for determination of plan completeness per 

40 CFR Part 51, Appendix V. 

The Missouri Department of Natural Resources requests that the Environmental 

Protection Agency amend the SIP to include the new plan submitted. 

Thank you for your attention to this matter. If you have any questions regarding 

this submittal, please contact David J . Lamb, Missouri Department of Natural 

Resources' Air Pollution Control Program at P.O . Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 

65102 or by phone at (573) 751-4817 . 

Sincerely, 

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL PROGRAM 

es L. Kavanaugh 

irector 

JLK:pms 

Enclosures : 

Copy of plan 

Copy of commission signature page certifying Missouri Air Conservation 

Commission adoption 

Copy of technical support documentation for plan (if applicable) 

Copies of public hearing newspaper notices 

Copy of public hearing transcript introductory statement 

Copy of public comments and responses 

c : Missouri Air Conservation Commission 
State of Missouri 

Plan for Implementation, 

Maintenance and Enforcement 

of National Ambient Air 

Quality Standards 

Missouri Air Conservation Commission 

Adopted: February 1, 2007 

Department of Natural Resources 

Air and Land Protection Division 

Air Pollution Control Program 

P.O. Box 176 

1659 East Elm Street 

Jefferson City, Missouri 65102 

Telephone (573) 751-4817 
Table of Contents 

Acknowledgments. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 

1 .0 Executive Summary. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 

2.0 Time Line History. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 

2.1 Ozone. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 

2.2 Particulate Matter. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 

2.2 .1 Historical Particulate Matter Monitoring Network. . . . . . . . . 8 

2.2 .2 Historical Analysis of Air Quality Data. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 

2.3 Long Range Transport. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 

3.0 All State Area Designations, (including out-state, 

Springfield/Greene County, the Kansas City 8-Hour Ozone 

Maintenance Area and the St. Louis 8-Hour Ozone 

Nonattainment and Particulate Matter 2.5 Nonattainment 

areas). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 

3.1 All State Area Designations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 

3.2 Out-State Design Values . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 

4.0 Administrative Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 

4.1 Section 110 of the CAAA of 1990 Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 

4.2 Legal Authority. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 

4.3 Commitment Letter to Revise Plans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 

4.4 Public Hearing Notice and Certification. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 

4.5 Comments, Responses, and Explanations of Change . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 

4.6 Missouri Air Conservation Commission Adoption Certification . . . . . . . . 18 

5.0 Quality Assurance Program. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 

5.1 Air Quality Analysis for 2005 Air Quality (9/30/05) . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 

5.2 Ozone and Particulate Matter 2.5 Monitoring Network . . . . . . . . . 19 

Missouri Air Quality Monitors Locations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 

6.0 List of Appendices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 

6.1 Appendix A Missouri Air Law. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 

6.2 Appendix B Commitment Letter to Revise Plans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 

6.3 Appendix C Effective State Rules and Forms. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 

6.4 Appendix D November 2006 Public Hearing Notice and 

Certification of Publication of the of the Notice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 

6.5 Appendix E December 7, 2006 Public Hearing Comments 

and Responses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 

6.6 Appendix F MACC Adoption Certification. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 
6.7 Appendix G 8-Hour Ozone and 

Particulate Matter 2.5 Area Designations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 

6.8 Appendix H Missouri Air Quality Monitors Data 

for Years 2003, 2004 and 2005. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 

6.9 Appendix I Missouri Air Quality Monitors Locations 

for Oxides of Nitrogen, Particulate Matter, Ozone 

and Oxides of Sulfur as of 9/30/05 and Missouri State 

Map Air Monitor Locations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 

6.10 Appendix J Clean Air Interstate Rules and 

Clean Air Mercury Rule MACC Adoption Certification. . . . . . . 68 
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

The information, analysis and documentation contained in this plan 

represents the cooperative effort between the United States Environmental 

Protection Agency (Region VII) and the Missouri Department of Natural 

Resources' Air Pollution Control Program. 

The Missouri Department of Natural Resources' Air Pollution Control 

Program gratefully acknowledges participants' input. 
1 .0 Executive Summary 

This state of Missouri Plan for Implementation, Maintenance and Enforcement of 

National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) has been written to fulfill the 

requirements of Section 110 of the Federal Clean Air Act Amendments (CAAA) 

of 1990. Section 110 of the CAAA requires that each state submit to the 

Administrator of the U.S . Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) a plan for the 

implementation, maintenance and enforcement of NAAQS in every air quality 

region within the state. 

The NAAQS was revised for the new 8-hour ozone primary and secondary 

standards proposed by EPA on July 18, 1997 and finalized on April 30, 2004. The 

revised 8-hour ozone standards require that revised state plans be submitted 

within three (3) years after the rule's effective date (June 15, 2007), and after 

promulgation of the NAAQS for any pollutant. 

The NAAQS for the new PM2.5 primary and secondary standards was proposed by 

EPA on July 18, 1997 and finalized on January 5, 2005 . The new PM2,5 standards 

require that revised state plans be submitted within three (3) years after the rule's 

effective date (April 5, 2008) and after promulgation of NAAQS for any 

pollutant. 

Environmental Defense and the American Lung Association filed suit against 

EPA alleging that EPA unreasonably delayed making determinations as to 

whether each state had submitted the remaining state implementation plan 

revisions required by CAA section 110 (a)(2) for implementation, maintenance 

and enforcement of the respective 1997 NAAQS. A Consent Decree was agreed 

to and signed that declared that State Implementation Plan (SIP) due dates are 

now Decemberl5, 2007 for ozone and October 5, 2008 for PM2.5 thus extending 

the three (3) year SIP submittal requirements. 

The content of this combined plan has been developed to demonstrate the 

continued attainment of primary and secondary standards for 8-hour ozone and 

for PM2,5 from the regulations for preparation, adoption and submittal of 

implementation plans codified in the Congressional Federal Record (CFR) at 40 

CFR part 51, Appendix V, "Criteria for Determining the Completeness of Plan 

Submissions". 

For the purpose of this plan, the state of Missouri consists of Out-state areas, the 

Kansas City metropolitan area and the St. Louis metropolitan area. These areas 

and designations are listed at 40 CFR part 81 .326, "Designation of Areas for Air 

Quality Planning Purposes - Missouri". 

This plan is for the entire state of Missouri. However, the Kansas City 

metropolitan area 8-hour ozone maintenance plan and the St. Louis metropolitan 
area 8-hour ozone and PM2.5 nonattainment plans are being addressed separately 

from this document. 

The state of Missouri acknowledges its responsibilities related to section 110(a) of 

the CAAA and reaffirms that the state has full authority under section I 10(a) to 

implement the revised NAAQS. 

Under the current SIP and Missouri statute (Appendix A), the state has the 

necessary infrastructure, resources and general authority to address the revised 

ozone and PMIO standards and the new PM2,5 standards. 

2.0 Time Line History 

2.1 Ozone 

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) established in 1971 a 

national primary and secondary maximum 1-hour National Ambient Air 

Quality Standards (NAAQS) ozone standard of 0.08 parts per million 

(ppm) that is not to be exceeded more than once per year. (See Federal 

Register, April 30, 1971, Volume 36, Number 84). 

The 1972 Kansas City and Out-state state implementation plan (SIP) 

stated that Set II Pollutant Considerations (carbon monoxide (CO), 

nitrogen oxides (NOX), hydrocarbon oxides (HC-OX)) that because the 

levels of CO, NOX, photochemical oxidants and hydrocarbons are 

generally well below the levels established as the secondary standards for 

these pollutants . It should be noted that control strategies for regions 

classified Priority III for any pollutant are not required by the federal 

government. (Set I Pollutants are particulate matter (PM) and sulfur oxides 

(SOX). 

Table I lists the final Air Quality Control Region (AQCR) Priority Classes 

for Out-state Missouri. 

TABLE I 

(AQCR) PM SOx CO NOx HC-Ox 

S W Intrastate I III III III III 

SE Intrastate III III III III III 

Northern Intrastate II III III III III 

Priority I Regions were required to submit: 
" air quality and emissions data in detail ; 

" a control strategy that was tested and found to be appropriate and 

adequate; 

" a comprehensive contingency plan for the prevention of air pollution 

emergency episodes; and finally 

" an air quality surveillance network. 

Priority II Regions are intermediate in scope and, therefore, fewer control 

strategies are required . Control strategies for regions classified as Priority 

III for any pollutant are not required . 

On February 8,1979, EPA revised the national primary and secondary 

maximum 1-hour ozone air quality standard to 0.12 ppm, with a 1-hour 

average not to be exceeded more than one day per year. (See Federal 

Register, February 8, 1979, Volume 44, Page 8202). 

On July 18,1997, EPA revised the 1-hour ozone air quality standard for 

ozone by replacing the 1979 standard with an 8-hour standard set at 0.08 

ppm (See Federal Register, July 18, 1997, Volume 62, Number 138). 

Three states and dozens of industry plaintiffs quickly challenged the new 

standards. EPA announced that the 1-hour ozone standard will no longer 

apply to an area one year after the effective date of the designation of that 

area for the 8-hour ozone air quality standard. (See Federal Register, April 

30, 2004, Volume 69, Number 84). EPA revoked the 1-hour ozone air 

quality standards on June 15, 2005, but the 1-hour ozone maintenance plan 

requirements will remain enforceable as part of the approved SIP until 

such time as EPA approves an 8-hour SIP. Out-state Missouri has always 

been in attainment for ozone. 

2.2 Particulate Matter 

EPA also promulgated PM total suspended particulate (TSP) 

NAAQS in 1971 which set the primary standard (the level where 

human health is affected) at 260 Rg/m3 for a 24-hour average and 

75 ~Ig/m3 for an annual geometric mean. EPA set the secondary 

standard (the level where the public's welfare, other than health, 

such as property damage is affected) at 150 [Ig/m3 for a 24-hour 

average. The Clean Air Act requires EPA to review the standards 

every five years as new data becomes available, and revise any 

standard as justified. 

On July 1, 1987, after extensive review and public comment 

covering a nine year period, EPA published it's final decision in 

the Federal Register concerning a revision to the particulate matter 

standard, which became effective July 31, 1987 . The revisions: 
" replaced the pollutant indicator for the standard from TSP to 

PMIO; 

" set the primary, health related 24-hour standard to 150 gg/m3; 

" set the primary annual standard to 50 gg/m3 ; and 

" set the secondary standards equal to the primary standards . 

2 .2 .1 Historical Particulate Matter Monitoring Network. 

The original monitoring network was set up at the 

following locations: 

1 . St. Louis, MO 

" Eight monitors in the Missouri portion of the St. 

Louis metropolitan area 

2. Kansas City, MO 

" Five monitors in the Missouri portion of the Kansas 

City metropolitan area 

3 . Springfield, MO 

" Three monitors 

4. St. Joseph, MO 

" One monitor 

5. Other monitors in the state 

" Hannibal, MO 

" Mexico, MO; 

" Columbia, MO 

" Herculaneum, MO; and 

" Mark Twain State Park in Monroe County. 

2.2 .2 Historical Analysis of Air Quality Data 

Data for 1985, 1986 and 1987 showed no violations in the 

three-year-period of the PM10 NAAQS. 

The data did show exceedances of the standards as follows: 

" The monitor at St. Joseph had an annual mean value of 

51 .7 ~tg/m3 (exceeding 50) in 1985. 

" The monitor in Mexico had a 24-hr exceedance of 164 

[Ig/m3 (exceeding 150) on Aug. 1, 1987 

The above exceedances were not violations of the standards 

for the following reasons: 

1 . The annual exceedance in St. Joseph in 1985 

occurred before a change in monitoring equipment 

operation for PM10 was initiated by EPA in mid1986. Following this change, lower values for PM10 

(about 20 percent less) were being taken than before 
the change at the same monitoring sites, and with 

that difference applied at the St. Joseph monitor for 

the 1985 exceedance, the adjusted value was below 

the annual standard . 

2 . The 24-hour exceedance in Mexico was the only 

one at that monitor during that calendar year. The 

standard allows one 24-hour exceedance per year at 

any one monitored site without being in violation of 

the standard . 

On July 18, 1997, EPA revised the particulate 

matter standards to include a new national primary 

and secondary ambient air quality standard for 

PM2,5 (See Federal Register, July 18, 1997, Volume 

62, Page 38711, Notices as amended at Federal 

Register July 30, 2004 Vol. 69. Page 45595). 

Out-state Missouri has always been in attainment 

for the PM standards except for the exceedances 

addressed by the Columbia Particulate Matter SIP 

(1980), Mexico Particulate Matter SIP (1979) and 

St. Joseph Particulate Matter SIP (1980) . 

There have also been exceedances by point sources 

at times that have been addressed by consent 

agreements and through permit modifications. The 

charcoal industry has been regulated by rule 10 

CRS 10-6 .330 "Restriction of Emissions from 

Batch-Type Charcoal Kilns" because of excess PM 

and opacity violations in the past. 

2.3 Long Range Transport 

During the mid-1990's, the EPA, states, and local agencies began 

to evaluate the impacts of long range transport of emissions on 

nonattainment areas for NAAQS. This evaluation led to EPA's 

promulgation of a SIP call to reduce nitrogen oxide emissions 

(NOX SIP Call). Missouri was not included in the first phase of the 

NOX SIP Call. However, Missouri developed a NOX transport 

regulation, 10 CSR 10-6.350 "Emission Limitations and Emissions 

Trading of Oxides of Nitrogen". This regulation was developed to 

fulfill the state's requirements under the EPA's 1-hour ozone 

attainment date extension policy as it applies to the St. Louis ozone 

nonattainment area. This regulation achieved NO,, emission 

reductions throughout the state of Missouri by placing an emission 
rate limit on electric generating units and established a rate based 

trading program, similar to EPA's Acid Rain Program. 

EPA promulgated Phase Il of the NO, SIP Call in 2004. The SIP 

call required Missouri to reduce NO,, emissions from electric 

generating units, cement kilns, industrial boilers, and stationary 

internal combustion engines. Missouri developed regulations to 

implement the requirements of EPA's NO, SIP call . These 

regulations became effective in October of 2005 and were 

approved by the EPA on Aug. 15, 2006. 

In March of 2005, EPA promulgated the Clean Air Interstate Rule 

(CAIR). This rule was designed to reduce NO,, and sulfur dioxide 

emissions from affected states to levels that would not significantly 

impact any neighboring states' ability to attain or maintain the 

NAAQS for ozone and fine particulate. This rule does apply to 

Missouri. Missouri began holding workgroup meetings to 

implement this rule in August of 2005 and is working toward rule 

development in response to CAIR. EPA finalized a Federal 

Implementation Plan for CAIR in April of 2006. This plan will 

remain in place until EPA approves a state plan. 

3.0 All State Area Designations, (including out-state, 

Springfield/Greene County, Kansas City 8-Hour Ozone 

Maintenance Area and the St. Louis 8-Hour Ozone 

Nonattainment and Particulate Matter 2.5 nonattainment 

area) 

3.1 All State Area Designations 

All State Area Designations are listed in Appendix G 

3.2 Out State Design Values 

Out-State Design Values are listed in Appendix H 

4.0 Administrative Requirements 

4.1 Section 110 : Requirements of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 
This section of the plan provides an explanation of how each applicable 

Clean Air Act (CAA) requirement is attained. 

Implementation Plans Requirements of the Clean Air Act 

Amendments of 1990. 

Section 110. Implementation Plans 

(a)(1) Each state shall, after reasonable notice and public hearings, adopt 

and submit to the Administrator, within 3 years (or such shorter period as 

the Administrator may prescribe) after the promulgation of a national 

primary ambient air quality standard (or any revision thereoj) under 

section 109 for any air pollutant, a plan which provides for 

implementation, maintenance, and enforcement of such primary standard 

in each air quality control region (or portion thereoj) within such state. In 

addition, such state shall adopt and submit to the Administrator (either as 

a part of a plan submitted under the preceding sentence or separately) 

within 3 years (or such shorter period as the Administrator may prescribe) 

after the promulgation of a national ambient air quality secondary 

standard (or revision thereofi, a plan which provides for implementation, 

maintenance, and enforcement of such secondary standard in each air 

quality control region (or portion thereof) within such state. Unless a 

separate public hearing is provided, each state shall consider its plan 

implementing such secondary standard at the hearing required by the first 

sentence of this paragraph. 

The 1972 Kansas City and out state plan was written to fulfill the original 

national ambient air quality standards. As mentioned in the Executive 

Summary of this document, this new state of Missouri plan has been 

written to fulfill the CAA section 110(a)(1) requirements by including 

revisions to include the new 8-hour ozone and PM2.5 primary and 

secondary standards. 

(2) Each implementation plan submitted by a state under this Act shall be 

adopted by the state after reasonable notice and public hearing. Each 

such plan shall- 

(A) include enforceable emission limitations and other control 

measures, means, or techniques (including economic incentives 

such as fees, marketable permits, and auctions of emissions rights), 

as well as schedules and timetables for compliance, as may be 

necessary or appropriate to meet the applicable requirements of 

this Act; 

State rule 10 CSR 10-6.010 "Ambient Air Quality Standards" and 

facilities individual rules, permits and consent agreements fulfill the 

requirements of 110(a)(2)(A) . 

-11- 
(2)(B) provide for establishment and operation of appropriate devices, 

methods, systems, and procedures necessary to - 

(i) monitor, compile, and analyze data on ambient air quality, 

and 

(ii) upon request, make such data available to the 

Administrator; 

The department's Air Pollution Control Program's Air Quality Analysis 

Section was created to and is maintained to fulfill the requirements of 

110(a)(2)(B) . 

(2)(C) include a program to provide for the enforcement of the measures 

described in subparagraph (A), and regulation of the modification and 

construction of any stationary source within the areas covered by the plan 

as necessary to assure that national ambient air quality standards are 

achieved, including a permit program as required in parts C and D; 

The department's Air Pollution Control Program's Enforcement Section 

and Permits Section was created and is maintained to fulfill the 

requirements of 110(a)(2)(C) . 

(2)(D) contain adequate provisions - 

(i) prohibiting, consistent with the provisions of this title, any 

source or other type of emissions activity within the state 

from emitting any air pollutant in amounts which will - 

(I) contribute significantly to nonattainment in, or 

interfere with maintenance by, any other state with 

respect to any such national primary or secondary 

ambient air quality standard, or 

(II) interfere with measures required to be included in 

the applicable implementation plan for any other 

state under part C to prevent significant 

deterioration of air quality or to protect visibility, 

(III) insuring compliance with the applicable 

requirements of sections 126 and 115 (relating to 

interstate and international pollution abatement); 

To fulfill the requirements of section 110 (a)(2)(D), several actions have 

been implemented over time. 

Visibility Protection 

EPA has made no determination that emissions from any state interfere 

with 1980 visibility plan measures required to be included in a plan to 

address reasonably attributable visibility impairment. EPA is not aware of 

any certification of existing reasonably attributable impairment of 

visibility by a Federal Land Manager that has not already been resolved. 

-12- 
Based on this information, no source in Missouri emits pollutants that 

interfere with measures included in visibility plans under 1980 regulations. 

At this time, Missouri's current nonattainment/maintenance plans for the 

8-hour ozone and PM2.5 NAAQS are under development. It is expected 

that these plans will benefit visibility protected areas in Missouri and other 

neighboring states . This is primarily due to the inclusion of NOX and SOZ 

controls under the Clean Air Interstate Rule and NOX SIP call regulations. 

Also, Missouri is working with the Central States Regional Air 

Partnership (CENRAP) regional planning organization in development of 

a regional haze plan that is due to be submitted to EPA December 2007. 

This on-going regional haze plan development process is intended to 

address incoming visibility impairing pollutants from sources in other 

states and Missouri source contribution on Missouri Class I areas as well 

as other states' protected areas. 

Prevention of Significant Deterioration 

All major sources located in attainment areas in the State of Missouri are 

currently subject to Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) 

permitting under state rule 10 CSR 10-6.060 Construction Permits 

Required section (8). Major sources located in nonattainment areas are 

currently regulated under a Nonattainment New Source Review (NNSR) 

permitting program under state rule 10 CSR 10-6.060 Construction 

Permits Required section (7). Missouri believes that the current rule 10 

CSR 10-6.060 Construction Permits Required rule meets the requirements 

of the Phase Il ozone implementation rule as St. Louis is classified as a 

moderate ozone nonattainment area. Missouri will follow EPA's most 

current policy on the implementation of all PSD and NNSR regulations as 

they relate to the implementation of the NAAQS. Missouri will also adopt 

EPA's revised regulations implementing the revisions to the NAAQS as 

expeditiously as possible. This will include the adoption of permitting 

requirements into the state permitting rules as soon as possible. 

Prevention of Significant Contribution 

Several rules have been implemented and are in development to prevent 

Missouri emissions from significantly contributing to nonattainment in 

other states or interfering with maintenance in other states with respect to 

any such national primary or secondary ambient air quality standard . 

Four (4) rules have been implemented to establish a NOX emissions 

trading program for the state of Missouri; establish an emission budget for 

large electric generating units and non-electric generating boilers; 

establish NOX control equipment and NO,, emission levels for cement 

kilns; and establish emission levels for large stationary internal 

combustion engines. 

-13- 
These four (4) state rules are 10 CSR 10-6.350 "Emission Limitations and 

Emissions Trading of Oxides of Nitrogen"; 10 CSR 10-6.360 "Control of 

NO, Emissions From Electric Generating Units and Non-Electric 

Generating Boilers" ; 10 CSR 10-6.380 "Control of NOX Emissions From 

Portland Cement Kilns"; and 10 CSR 10-6.390 "Control of NOX 

Emissions From Large Stationary Internal Combustion Engines". 

Four (4) additional rules are in development to address a Clean Air 

Interstate Rule Annual NOX Trading Program; a Clean Air Interstate Rule 

Seasonal NOX Trading Program; a Clean Air Interstate Rule S02 Trading 

Program; and Control of Mercury Emissions From Electric Generating 

Units. (See Appendix J for Clean Air Interstate Rules and Clean Air 

Mercury Rule MACC Adoption Certifications). 

(2)(E) provide (i) necessary assurances that the state (or, except where the 

Administrator deems inappropriate, the general purpose local government 

or governments, or a regional agency designated by the state or general 

purpose local governments for such purpose) will have adequate 

personnel, funding, and authority under state (and, as appropriate, local) 

law to carry out such implementation plan (and is not prohibited by any 

provision of Federal or state law from carrying out such implementation 

plan or portion thereoj), (ii) requirements that the state comply with the 

requirements respecting state boards under section 128, and (iii) 

necessary assurances that, where the state has relied on a local or 

regional government, agency, or instrumentality for the implementation of 

any plan provision, the state has responsibility for ensuring adequate 

implementation of such plan provision; 

The Missouri Air Conservation Law (643 .079, RSMo) requires the 

Missouri Air Conservation Commission to set an annual air pollution 

emission fee to fund the reasonable cost of administering this law. Section 

643, RSMo also provides the authority necessary to carry out the state 

implementation plan requirements. The department's Air Pollution 

Control Program also has signed state and local agreements with St Louis 

City, St. Louis County, Kansas City and Springfield/and with the 

surrounding states fulfills the requirements of 110(a)(2)(E) . 

(2) (F) require, as may be prescribed by the Administrator - 

(i) the installation, maintenance, and replacement of 

equipment, and the implementation of other necessary 

steps, by owners or operators of stationary sources to 

monitor emissions from such sources, 

(ii) periodic reports on the nature and amounts of emissions 

and emissions-related data from such sources, and 

(iii) correlation of such reports by the State agency with any 

emission limitations or standards established pursuant to 

-14- 
this Act, which reports shall be available at reasonable 

times for public inspection; 

State rule requirements fulfill the requirements of 110(a)(2)(F) . 

(2)(G) provide for authority comparable to that in section 303 and 

adequate contingency plans to implement such authority; 

State rulel0 CSR 10-6.130 "Controlling Emissions During Episodes of 

High Air Pollution Potential" and contingency elements in the St. Louis 

nonattainment SIP and Kansas City maintenance SIP fulfill the 

requirements of 110(a)(2)(G) . 

(2) (H) provide for revision of such plan - 

(i) from time to time as may be necessary to take account of 

revisions of such national primary or secondary ambient 

air quality standard or the availability of improved or more 

expeditious methods of attaining such standard, and 

(ii) except as provided in paragraph (3)(C), whenever the 

Administrator finds on the basis of information available to 

the Administrator that the plan is substantially inadequate 

to attain the national ambient air quality standard which it 

implements or to otherwise comply with any additional 

requirements established under this Act; 

Affirmation letter dated September 27, 2004 to Chief, Air Planning and 

Development Branch, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region VII 

regarding the state of Missouri's responsibilities related to section 110(a) 

of the Clean Air Act. This letter reaffirms that we have full authority under 

section 110(a) to implement the revised National Ambient Air Quality 

Standards and fulfills the requirements of 110(a)(2)(H) . 

(2) (1) in the case of a plan or plan revision for an area designated as a 

nonattainment area, meet the applicable requirements of part D (relating 

to nonattainment areas); 

Affirmation letter dated September 27, 2004 to Chief, Air Planning and 

Development Branch, U.S . Environmental Protection Agency, Region VII 

regarding the state of Missouri's responsibilities related to section 110(a) 

of the Clean Air Act. This letter reaffirms that we have full authority under 

section 110(a) to implement the revised National Ambient Air Quality 

Standards and fulfills the requirements of 110(a)(2)(I) . 

(2)(J) meet the applicable requirements of section 121 (relating to 

consultation), section 127 (relating to public notification), and part C 

-15- 
(relating to prevention of significant deterioration of air quality and 

visibility protection); 

The department's Air Pollution Control Program's rulemaking process 

public participation fulfills the requirements of 110(a)(2)(J) . 

(2) (K) provide for - 

(i) the performance of such air quality modeling as the 

Administrator may prescribe for the purpose ofpredicting 

the effect on ambient air quality of any emissions of any air 

pollutant for which the Administrator has established a 

national ambient air quality standard, and 

(ii) the submission, upon request, of data related to such air 

quality modeling to the Administrator; 

The department's Air Pollution Control Program's Air Quality Analysis 

Section was created and is maintained to fulfill the requirements of 

110(a)(2)(K) . 

(2)(L) require the owner or operator of each major stationary source to 

pay to the permitting authority, as a condition of any permit required 

under this Act, a fee sufficient to cover - 

(i) the reasonable costs of reviewing and acting upon any 

application for such a permit, and 

(ii) if the owner or operator receives a permit for such source, 

the reasonable costs of implementing and enforcing the 

terms and conditions of any such permit (not including any 

court costs or other costs associated with any enforcement 

action), 

until such fee requirement is superseded with respect to such sources by 

the Administrator's approval of a fee program under title V; 

The department's Air Pollution Control Program's Permits Section and 

rules 10 CSR 10-6.060 Construction Permits Required, 10 CSR 10-6.061 

Construction Permit Exemptions, 10 CSR 10-6 .062 Construction Permits 

by Rule and 10 CSR 10-6.065 Operating Permits fulfills the requirements 

of 110(a)(2)(L) . 

(2)(M) provide for consultation and participation by local political 

subdivisions affected by the plan. 

The department's Air Pollution Control Program's signed State and Local 

Agreements with St Louis City, St. Louis County, Kansas City and 

Springfield/Greene as well as participation with the Mid-America 

Regional Council; East-West Gateway Coordinating Council; the St. 

-16- 
Louis East-West Gateway Council of Governments and rulemaking 

process public participation fulfills the requirements of 110(a)(2)(M). 

4.2 Legal Authority 

The Missouri Air Conservation Commission (MACC) is granted legal 

authority to develop and implement regulations regarding air pollution 

under section 643.050 of the Revised Statutes of Missouri (RSMo). 

Under the current SIP and Missouri statutes, the state has the necessary 

infrastructure, resources and general authority to address the new 8-hour 

ozone air quality and PM2.5 standards. 

The specific powers and duties of the state are outlined in section 643 .050, 

RSMo "Powers and Duties of the Commission", 643 .055, RSMo 

"Commission May Adopt Rules for Compliance with Federal Law", and 

643 .060, RSMo "Powers and Duties of Director". 

The MACC is the air pollution control agency of the state and has the 

authority, pursuant to chapter 536, RSMo "Administrative Procedure and 

Review", to promulgate rules and regulations to establish standards and 

guidelines to ensure that the State of Missouri is in compliance with the 

provisions of the federal Clean Air Act. 

These statutes grant the MACC and the director direct authority to 

implement any federal standards through state rules and procedures. A 

copy of the Missouri Air Conservation Law (Appendix A) that pertains to 

the powers and duties of the commission and the director are in sections 

643 .010-643 .070, RSMo . Missouri's complete air law is in sections 

643 .010-643 .620, RSMo . 

4.3 Commitment to Revise Plans 

An affirmation letter, (Appendix B), dated Sept. 27, 2004 to Chief, Air 

Planning and Development Branch, U.S . Environmental Protection 

Agency, Region VII regarding the state of Missouri's responsibilities 

related to section 110(a) of the Clean Air Act. This letter reaffirms that 

we have full authority under section 110(a) to implement the revised 

National Ambient Air Quality Standards. 

4.4 Public Hearing Notice and Certification 

The Missouri Department of Natural Resources' Air Pollution Control 

Program is required to announce a public hearing at least 30 days prior to 

holding such hearing. This was accomplished by announcements 

submitted to newspapers at least 30 days prior to the public hearing which 

occurred on December 7, 2006. The public hearing notice along with 

-17- 
certification of publication of the public notice for this plan amendment is 

in Appendix D. 

4.5 Comments, Responses and Explanations of Change 

The department's Air Pollution Control Program's responses to comments 

received during the open public comment period on this plan are in 

Appendix E. The comment period was open for seven (7) days after the 

Public Hearing on December 7, 2006. The department's Air Pollution 

Control Program is required to respond to all comments. 

4.6 Missouri Air Conservation Commission Adoption Certification 

The MACC adoption certification to demonstrate approval by the 

commission of the state implementation plan amendment is in Appendix 

F. 

5.0 Quality Assurance Program 

The department's Air Pollution Control Program quality assures all data in 

accordance with 40 CFR 58 .10 and the department's Air Pollution Control 

Program standard operating procedures for operating the ambient monitoring 

networks and validating the data. The department's Air Pollution Control 

Program records the data in the U.S . Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) 

Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS) database, which is available to 

the public . 

5.1 Air Quality Analysis for 2005 Air Quality (9/30/05) 

The following information is for the ambient air monitors operated by all 

reporting organizations including state, local, and industry which is 

updated to the EPA AIRS database for 2005 . The total number of 

exceedances of the NAAQS to date in 2005 are summarized below: 

" Ozone 

All areas in the state are in compliance with the 1-hour ozone air quality 

standard . St. Louis is classified as a moderate non-attainment area for the 

8-hour standard . There were 98 exceedances of the 8-hour ozone air 

quality standard in 2005. Two sites, West Alton and Orchard Farm, are in 

violation for 2003 to 2005. 

0 PMZ.s 
All Missouri sites now meet both the 24-hour and annual standards. The 

St. Louis area remains in violation for 2002 to 2004 due to two Illinois 

sites, Granite City (16.9 Rg/m3) and East St. Louis (15.4 p,g/m3), that are 

over the annual standard . 

" Data Completeness 

Data completeness for Missouri is typically excellent, averaging 

percentages in the high 90s. Data completeness for the first three calendar 

quarters was 97%, 97%, and 96%. The Ladue PM2,5 monitor lacked the 

most complete data at 57% in the second quarter and 36% in the third due 

to mechanical problems. Only one other monitor has a quarter less than 

75%, the PM2.5 sampler at the University of Missouri, Kansas City. This, 

however, was attributable to operator error. 

Missouri Air Quality Monitor Data for Years 2003, 2004 and 2005 

See Appendix H 

5.2 Ozone and Particulate Matter 2.5 Monitoring Network 

" Missouri Air Quality Monitors Locations 

See Appendix I 

6.0 List of Appendices 

6.1 Appendix A Missouri Air Law. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 

6.2 Appendix B Commitment Letter to Revise Plans . . . . . . 22 

6.3 Appendix C Effective State Rules and Forms. . . . . . . . . . . . 26 

6.4 Appendix D December 7, 2006 Public Hearing Notice 

and Certification of Publication of the 

of the Notice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 

6.5 Appendix E December 7, 2006 Public Hearing 

Comments and Responses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 

6.6 Appendix F MACC Adoption Certification . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 

6.7 Appendix G 8-Hour Ozone and Particulate 

Matter 2.5 Area Designations. . . . . . . . . . . . 48 

-19- 
6.8 Appendix H Missouri Air Quality Monitor Data 

for Years 2003, 2004 and 2005. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 

6.9 Appendix I Missouri Air Quality Monitors 

Locations for Oxides of Nitrogen, 

Particulate Matter, Ozone and 

Oxides of Sulfur as of 9/30/05 . . . . . . . . . 60 

6.10 Appendix J Clean Air Interstate Rules and 

Clean Air Mercury Rule 

MACC Adoption Certification. . . . . . . . . . 68 
APPENDIX A 

6.1 Appendix A MISSOURI AIR CONSERVATION LAW 

The Missouri Air Conservation Law is available for viewing at; 

http ://www.moga.mo.gov/statutes/chapters/chap643 .htm 
APPENDIX B 

6.2 Appendix B Commitment Letter to Revise Plans 

Affirmation letter dated September 27, 2004 to Chief, Air Planning and 

Development Branch, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region V11 regarding 

the state of Missouri's responsibilities related to section 110(a) of the Clean Air Act. 

This letter reaffirms that we have full authority under section 110(a) to implement 

the revised National Ambient Air Quality Standards. 
Bob Holden, Governor . Stephen M. Mahfood, Director 

T OF NATURAL RESOURCES 

www dnr.mo.gov :;s_ro 

fill `,`.' : 

SEP 2 7 2004 , 

Mr. Joshua A. Tapp 

Chief, Air Planning and Development Branch 

EPA Region VII 

901 North 5" Street 

Kansas City, KS 66101 

Dear Mr: Tapp: 

This letter is in response to your correspondence of April 29, 2004, to Ms. Leanne J. Tippett 

regarding the state of Missouri's responsibilities related to section 110(a) of the Clean Air Act. 

This letter reaffirms that we have full authority under section 110(a) to implement the revised 

National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). 

Pursuant to the revised and new NAAQS for ozone and particulate matter (PM), we have 

evaluated the rules in our current state implementation plan (SIP) to determine if any revisions 

are necessary. 

.Under the current SIP and Missouri statute, the state has the necessary infrastructure and general 

authority to address the revised ozone and PM,o standards and the new PM2.5 standard. 

Specifically, 643.050, RSMo Powers and Duties of the Commission, 643.055, RSMo 

Commission May Adopt Rules for Compliance with Federal Law, and 643.060, RSMo Powers 

and Duties of Director grant the Missouri Air Conservation Commission and the Director of the 

Department of Natural Resources direct authority to implement any federal standards through 

state rules and procedures. . 

We have evaluated our current SIP for section 110 ("110 SIP") with regards to the new 

standards. The current SIP can be amended to implement the revised ozone and new PM1o and 

PM2.5 emissions inventories, monitoring networks, and modeling. All control measures under 

the old PM1o standard have been implemented and continue to be enforced except rule 10 CSR 

10-6.330 Restriction of Emissions from Batch-Type Charcoal Kilns . This rule was adopted on 

March 26, 1998, and was effective on July 30, 1998. The phasing in of control of the kilns will 

be finalized in 2005. 

Missouri is committed to revising the following state rules for ozone and particulate matter by 

the June 15, 2007 deadline as necessary so that they reflect the revised ozone and particulate 

standards . 

Integrity and excellence in all we do 

iA -,7-Natural' 

Recyded Paw Resources 

-23- 
Mr. Joshua A: Tapp 

Page Two 

1. 10 CSR 10-6 .010 Ambient Air Quality Standards. 

" Update Table to reflect new revisions to the NAAQS. 

2. 10 CSR 10-6.020 Definitions and Common Reference Tables . 

" Add PMZS definition . 

" Update Table 1 to include PM2.5 and to reflect new revisions to the NAAQS. 

3. 10 CSR 10-6.030 Sampling Methods for Air Pollution Sources. 

" Update 6.030(5), Particulate Emissions, to include a better explanation of PM2.5 

monitoring. 

4. 10 CSR 10-6.040 Reference Methods. 

" Update 6.040(4) to include the new PM2,5 standard. 

5. 10 CSR 10-6 .060 Construction Permits Required . 

" Update Table 6.060(11)(A) to include PM2.5. 

" Update Table 6.060 (11)(B) in include PM2,5 if required. 

" Update Table 6.060(11)(D) to include PMZ,5. 

" Update Table 6.060(12) Appendix H to include the new PMZ.S standard . 

" Update Emissions Inventory Questionnaire to include PM2,5. 

" Update Form 3.0, Emission Fee Calculation to include PM2,5. 

6. 10 CSR 10-6 .065 Operating Permits. 

" Update 6.065(1)(D)3.D . to include PMZ,S. 

7. 10 CSR 10-6.130 Controlling Emissions During Episodes of High Air Pollution 

Potential . 

(Please note this rule currently requires no change but it will be reviewed for any 

necessary changes when EPA updates 40 CFR part 51, Appendix L in the future.) 

8. 10 CSR 10-2.390 Conformity to State or Federal Implementation Plans of 

Transportation Plans, Programs, and Projects Developed, Funded or Approved Under 

Title 23 U.S .C. or the Federal Transit Laws. 

(Please note this rule will need to be updated to include PM2,5 when the federal 

conformity rules are updated to include PMZS.) 

9. 10 CSR 10-5.480 Conformity to State or Federal Implementation Plans of 

Transportation Plans, Programs, and Projects Developed, Funded or Approved Under 

Title 23 U.S .C. or the Federal Transit Laws 

, r(Please note this rule will need to be updated to include PM2,5 when the federal 

conformity rules are updated to include PM2,5.) 
Mr. Joshua A. Tapp 

Page Three 

Thank you for your assistance and guidance concerning the 110 SIP requirements . If you have 

any questions or comments, you can contact me with the Air Pollution Control Program at 

P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102 or by phone at (573) 751-4817 . 

Sincerely, 

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL PROGRAM 

Leanne Tippett osby 

Director 

LTM:pms 

c: Stephen Mahfood, Director's Office 

James D. Wemer, Air and Land Protection Division 
APPENDIX C 

6.3 Appendix C Effective State Rules and Forms 

The Missouri air pollution control rules are available for viewing at ; 

http://www.sos .mo.gov/adrules/csr/current/lOcsr/lOcsr .asp#10-10 

The Missouri air pollution control forms are available for viewing at ; 

http://intranet.dnr.state .mo.us/forms/forms.htm 
APPENDIX D 

6.4 Appendix D November 2006 Public Hearing Notice 

and Certification of Publication of the Notice 
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION 

MO DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL PRO 

POB 176 

JEFFERSON CITY MO 65'1t12 

24307683 

7510572 

a true copy of which is hereto aftachied, 

was duly published in the above said newspaper 

FOR TI-1E PERIOD OF: I Day (s) 

COMMENCING: November 5,2006 

ENDING: November 6s 2006 

STAR EDITION (S): 1115 

STAR PAPER (S); +9 

VOLUME: #127 

Subscribed and sworn to before me, 

this Monday, 06 No1fenber, 2006 . 

I tec'klfy tot I was duly 

as 8 No$aiy Pub liGfof' thie Skate of 

0, commisskxwd in Jackson 

County, Missouri. My commiset 

expires September 10, 2010. 

~ 

E 

¢/ h 

;/ EE 

THE KANSAS CITY STAR COMPANY, publishers of 

THE KANSAS CITY STAR, a newspaper published in 

the City (f Kansas City, County of Jackson, State of 

Missouri, confirms that the rloti ce and/or cidYeM serC1ent of 

1151SSO-~'I AIR CC7NSEt? ~'drTA'ro; r"r~7tSAAlESSIiZt~ 

a!u mom Pur1 irriPn :rlNC, 

r1F~', vcan .- ?ir r.t " ~ari Air C+~erv-''a^-

- : a, 11~-t on !Co¢st~" n :on 

:~a Aat ik,'.~ 

~h . t. 14~

. 

I 

D'^etr,t, - , 'fading pre ~; 

: (,i c ; : TJ i r .: ~ &2Z, 

t cl r re< Frt i n:eF _~,r Efearrc 

~tw~te tni Ua i irr" r ,-fer i tttr~- ta ..:?~ 

GYA~d I [ .r"tc<ur 6ir Win Ft o,n Eart,. .~ Clsr- 

, atg Stata rt N.i3irw.r e For .rpIaralil 

and [ufa_irK~ ~A 4 r Nttic.n:. : r;~6 

. . .rl ~ta~rlce 

C~uxirr,y ~Pcnd7tda eccrnbar T "2F 

ot :eslFt Hearhg Mil b.;-pin a~ m. it " he ~E 

Laanfi~r1p r Center 11U F- t Iral 4[ec , LV 

ta~rr g~}p[s i ihsliih rl?[~:11 t#>tp'fa 

rtte .~tdans. sa CSR 1as.W ro~~sraUCtiW t"ftftx BY RAJ* 

t 

14 GSA 10-,U C~eInt~atate Rvfe ~al ~!C * 

T1 911 t'rora'ts 

TFc C3 .S . Cr, rr~qn?Iptat Prqk~cticir iRgir~t~,~r°s~C 

ctP .x) da6r In~t:v""t. . Rad¢~ ralrukh9,s .BFt fiv! 

.r90dtlc1: t_ rcCr .ca N4.ft 

u~nwatl~ ca~tt-= tcztf~in~ ~ 

Wi ~c et+`~i.6 theE ~r!d 

li ~ p~ 

ia U4 ;r . Conal iradlrr~ ~'v5al` 

° l41 ~~ 7C~~.~U4 Ct~arn t4ir I~~,,-. ~tato"t3zalqr 3wasrwsnt . 

lp"salllt'rC*W at! 1rrt~erst~tetiude $t~'-ad9~I 

~r~~ 

tat Prakert6oXe 

statc Rule riaqiire6 

-iona` ~q ~a~us"B Soi t+ftllsSll&ns 

'iG~ ~rrC3 SS~IIIFti7g irY ~yIll p, r h . 

d~ulillc7 th~rk `~4ad ~t in~ aC 

~tsaWtrRS}r~tf~wx¢gncnm ~dic ;rr 

b11 

~iSSipP'~Ir:-t .~c . :". : 

't'f~d7'g ~p¢ KD%fda[S.rut 

i5 ttt+Hl~!~d mW04srfarat xrrru', ; ~en :~vr~ tt^~ iR 

~s C41 .~'~'rTt~t~" 

~1QMk5'tksfl$'~Kt ~'1ZfSla>'" 'a,~,'. 

z~ e~ aa-s,~oc~tt~t or NO( gr~rlssict~ rr~r I~c -- 

r rr~erat~d uan~s ~3wr~¬Ie~.si :~ ~r~vr~~ gvr~~g tte u~ I an 

=rr ts .a¬ 1 

~ ,rN~ rw4~. 

~i11C5dt ~~+r9681C~n`r,> ::r +r . ; usp~~riSSiw'~s Fr~St 

WW ~" n . ~ .~T ,a t~n,t~ 

id Rrn~c :r~ot' antS31C}~a CEFr ~ 

a (2nI . . rcy.Nlr$": _tab?,; r6tlWa ~ 

Pnsitilry 8Rt75', nn : 'ra,r~ ¢i¢ct~IK 

tmev~ ~[ ~USyr~" 'i : : ~ .-,rasee ru4a 

tll4l "t5. Lr,s~: ." " s oF 

anal 'ItF ' heq ?r c,; r . t . .. :.taS1w 

SapiCS[ .v :.-0 F r :d 

I,t~s Rs~r lcnel ~ n P4 9i. t E SIs644 ", l~r 

LCrkisv {Sl1t 416-~16& ~- . . 9Y. W~nal--,d, `~ " ".?`kI 

Persans mr t1~~' tl ; c ag =geciaI s~wstS S"c ~-

CCR'sllG~S~S La .rt :"iu YI 1'AEe .TIrn9 4~C+ make Wrxaaemaarls Jr ~rir-ant dirwrF a {533; v ca M`I ~ 

t~. t __ t .r .71 fir" nwTtz: a9 

qr psyp rnIny t'r, :ck lr adr5' " d 

d: ~smui 6. .-.~,ar r-FSrat sf OA , ~l Pn~-,r 

~t~R lGrtrlir~tsqlacs SexrctEp'3'. P,d$. F-ar 

srur, c;u:~; : 

t rz, ;o tn aa v"-r'aai :" rwr- : 

~ * ,also Rwnt'i~:.: wr'tor ccf . tt r ttn rn"" ttu 

r, mtr ,;,; k n -ncret,uy a. tl~p k1rltk !d t ~,8 P ~h 6c t:~a .a ;;x 

T h e r rrlrrc-,t also VfiG ~~ttt 1~4r c ~rr+.ats " 

.iii~ 5 ~,[r. on DPL 14 20G ' +, 1.--

1 r~ar~~ 4t Al ,94i cummacrts iu L° .:er -

~h i ~ Ccantr4t Pzag'~'s. #{,t~. 

;~~ Aa~tv.~CaG42-0t~ 
Rtf=n= 

Ad M- ` SMSM I3ESC* ;H' i210'7106 

MO DEPT NATURAL PtiSOU~CES, 

AIR PodunON CONTROL PROGRAM 

W. BOX 176 

JEFFERSON CnY. MO 65102-0176 

County of BuCha1an 

Sate of Mssouti 

1, Leona GillEit'$'Waterx being duly worri 

according to law, state that I am the 

-Press, $ daily newspaper 

ing 

general circulation in the, county of 

Bucharan, where located; which has 

been adfriill0d to the Post Office as second class mafteC` in the city of St. 

Joseph, the city of publication; where 

has been published regularly 

and consecutively for a period of three 

Years and has a list of bona fide 

subscribers voluntarily engaged to pay a 

iptian for a 

defirtite period of time, and that such 

newspaper has compiled with the 

provisions of Section 493.050 Revised 

Statutes of Murj, 1W. The atffied 

red in said newspaper on 

following date: 

Run . t1tWld6 to IIIW06 

AD SPAM 178 

TOTAL (=T-. VIOM 

MID ON lil07,/0b 

(Signed) 
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION 

IN THE 

ST. LOUIS, WSsOuRi 63101 

was pubr~sned as talbws: 

n the St. Louis Post-Dispatch 

~~tesa 

Sworn to and subscribed before me, 

i 

My term expires 

it chau~ge'~~,a~~ ~ 

PATWSA CAAUSM ' 

RMY 

g~ _ 

Qs.r0 
Mice:.us Lk{+..n+ret o' `?r~unl Ra.: .m.1 

ift, ll,SN F!m 4ust, 

4sl Mis, WO NE Cow u Rz+.!s t*v'sSntt 

At :7 FAti'+'cd two, 71:ti mmlgaa Il'b+. 

;.aO1mt ftv,e,i! OT 44, 11 ' S N leaf wi 

t`^4 YU3vTht sit.x4 kt'.^,rarf Ms 

'to, 1: Caua r.l ~i~ ~:o tv(,~2 Soudfwg R 
' ,E..4Rsr2 : iAlt r*`n,L PI'R ! 

, ~ ,rr " . : BY a,~lr: ;rF , n . in 1 

I 

I! ~~a'°' Suit 

raav<~na~. A" ,. -r.t AA .<r. :fl-r 

~'h^ 

" L. t M~ ~~IF~ F.1-re! 

b--~.i- a

" 4 .d 

1 - 

. ._ .. Wit ~.f ~.+s .~-;nrnur~ ; ti~i?r~~. 

~ 

f :'A~soxl~;f~`~ 

a~,~ab ,l~. nc . 

~ . A 

C r. - 

t J~ 

Ygo , 

+,t : ; " . , .,r 

jn . _ r_ifcn'ry 

..SN l :GW 4.;r . . . 

I 

A^ 

--.t-cd 

~rd a+nnrclmtern A~it~e,C .r" c ~ C ; 3- 

nt®I RroleCbec Av'E" ney~ 

rudt n't t rrttr'rs Cor.Fit Rr0:IDb r. Cin .+' 1r< "-

,'6 m`.iCw POW a? :1 LWdtc<^ . ~ :f :> ;®jk" 

54.1n lrtFi ~^^~l~` " auan alBrl* Loro"^ 

rf to _rat,^ 'he 04 :.F1rirP,±+tt r, :# 

. . sCntLCa" y4rta91 tib° 

Clrnn Ait Ir'r.r<t: Ae ^tr-114t 

Ir .l 

L , . -,<att ;~t Frs,eCtrn 4~f:r,G}~~ I`=F?ti 

in u""{:0 T h,," ;'r:no:.r." r9 

in.°.if.R'ny r .q.>,;re:. 

~ ~ .rin ;; 13'"Aratn 

~LC1CSti 1f f Jd>P" 'ubt" n 

'Trading FtW4:SR or 

UV-1111C G:r»rtatlrva o 

ionI '1`t 

U5 .!° 1% 4 .6-2 

1, dn.rf.a-r_5 . 

irt~S 34"l".1~ tU W" +91n 

7it") J7- .*Wt, 

' : x 

, 1+. c.al'~i~C1 t' 

;H'.,_ it,p °,`rr3:1 :-!flt-r,.S 

00 1 -!.l .C6+0 . . Nl . " ~! l~i', .Y .; 

lr,t,mte! ~., .~ in . ~`I {) ''01,W : 

r. ~7rvat,le> _0ri'°T :'- Sntl' P . "" " ., 

(+t"-t' .=?"5 ":nG1Y. -_` . 

r~. : C13l 

.. 

, 

:f Ruin stw 

~eeA) M,IrW ,~r-rtr 

~ ~s 

'3"h ' ,'S. EnvtlOl'a'n~nt i P . `n .-t . Y ."qr-tc, ~ If °A$ 

t'.1 0. Ai+ t^trrri.9S~ A i r,Ru .-w1 t ttt+4 r, }"_velr0 

n .t ~ ; E^, :,gfnr t , 

01 !htn ~+, 

'-frtnt wvu1,7 renc-.e t^< 

R i( .''! i5- - .n r>" 'qtr!3rr"<:r.i: 

C IL . . . ~~-7E~',. tltartl''_ . 

0-&3W ~`.~r+irei Or hi i rr u>.,,osr. Crarrl 

irr3 Lrrx~ " ~uac! ~"2cc Fk ^ " : ~~a~ -" 

C +31~mm:~a~Blh+:', ,jy~n.q; ">rdsnPr,tSr.iant'M 

it8'r""'td r t i: ^f.d .'--- tf^.r "iv .r,rn75G ;.tt 0 

p¢p*W n. Ia 10 .: L F 04 m t:~ 7hr- rc Qe f r8ttstlblS°. 

!'J G$fi C 'G 3s% . m.crH dnn.7ent ',hnr'i this 

frwl^'-+r'lr, .-,ta' i rr,ttamo, rlgonc^Ya'ti~P$~ 

:t,IrtSr .,tc R.fI." . . - rO -Pew tot3Cscrtx to -rr,ufa? rrx- . . ."_~i= 3CPr'l 

, ,mi .s Cr .,J' ' . 

~ ;of .r'_rs clhcrct~Ia'a :'rA'''q~ 

b :.cnd ~?, f Na . 

"".oi:or: plot, -5>Ata A Sfs 

;1 1.111 A : . - ,"JtL~I : .° i'.3 

nt'h~ciC.titiJ+r+,nf : :blUl .l 'h: yr .: "'H- 

,aicn All '_ a 

70 .."t Fhc 

t .a :h " <air ^t : . ? A1fn"- 

A i' y 

m _ w t :r i 

krOa'a Aft ih.raRty 

- . "-.~ r'N7~°rf~ S^C ~.~YlE1y 

- , . I~f1(f,yr~J`.'ti'f`PCr1 

" - a 

f o la_ : 

-ar.WJ fC .. f .If, :tl o

 

Fi' .=,;JSr'r'! . c " r r : .-:~ City, 15'73)'751-48* v. 

, Of ,~ f',* . 91 r E f_,7 torn Ar39t°..i"" rrr R :r- 

"t. -" .~? "f.rD ., . n . tres t 47»;,x,r:~ t ."~t~l 

f>!os .nO c4".: 1Ancw )3FS_ 

r-»~.u . 2 -fN .~ r~~t~+~ 

:S .r .., ua,';7:7, s, t .uuw 

s LrnOrtp, i:tte Z1~, a 

So, .rt`n c" '" t P0~ . ,i (~Yt" -q~ 

, ,ntprN .7 . i'7',' 1 4".M 

STATE OF WSS"I 

Ltouk'a'f of GPeene 

~ ~t#~ state that 1 arttt, 

duty atrftdzed to and do make tf~~s affidavit for and on behalf of 

Leader, a newspaper f4ibtis1he+d in the City Of Sllir7ngfbetd . GfeOrse 

County, MissQuri that 

pubit~ti~t, 2t true c~ppy , ~ d~i~ published ~t ~~ 

~ 

which ~ ~ 

newspaper '1 lime(s) upon the k4lowirig dates: 

an Sunday, November 5. 

i do ftardier that "W newspa 

admi;led to Iha Post Office as SOOXW Class rqaaftr, that A is a ti sW of 

general circulation it " City otSpingfietd, Missouri; that 4 has 

puWstted regularty and w`v* *w a period of mora' than e yews: 

that ft has a list of bona We sutxscOers voluntarily enqaged as such; who 

have paid or agreed to pay a stAtgd price for a subscription for a defan lte 

period a4 time, and Inad $aW newspaper has complied with the ptovisrons of 

Section 14956 Rev 6S of M'mso+s°i, 'f9%, relating, fo "PWr_ 

~d~tt~ 

Notary Public in and for 

Gre County, Missouri 
n at 

Stmt 

17'38 

Lower 

=~~ City, Ma 

nkam will 

amy ~,~r 

CSR 104662 

i[n Fan¬s B1' 

'$) 

auction 

ore, 

beipg t® s 

ha wm (t) 

to do s 

. 

10 CSR 1".364 

Air ln%atoc Rub 

° tvhg duly Morn rg 6i3 h~r, 9W O O W I am P'U K ,I SHER he The Dall " ~'~ , a daOY Aews p ape r ot 9we ra9 circulation . ~ he counties Of SkAjer 

each Mae ij to tMTaiscot; o w Madrid and ` newspaper has been admitted to ft p0K 01fke as second 

'~. ~ u~~ matter in Cit y ~ Poplar ~uff, M , ~t 0 c~ty O 1 put~l~ at ~; which ~' t~. } n paper t~ b~n t mrty se ty ar p c~' tl~r 

& sed egul and Cw cu tj v f a e 

ma ee ` ft fs and h li t of b n r v u r yt d as su wh 

as a s o a foe w"` bGre ol ta il e ch o 0 paid or d $ pri a cri t +n f r and to pay cq W SUbS p io o a te period 

0axama of &a OW and that ~~~~h er he ns p has compiled with t praAsIo of sectW 

Quality Sunlfir& 

* 

~ .050, 

newspaper 

Revised St~atr~es of Missouri 198~. The affixed ne~ct~ appeared in 

w ~ 

~~ ( in the ~ ~ "t~ I 

r.rA. 

m' Stmft 

menuktion Plan -

of missouri Plan 

imomcmfim 

And 

Of Nadond 

Jkir Quality 

(573)751-0179 city 

~; ~~~, 

~"~E ~' ~;~St3LFRt~ 

~"UNTY OF BUTEEAR) SS. 

Sectift 

Louis 

7545 

sdcC a1k Sc, 

RtgioaW M i Mom to bakxe me hs 

i"Y75l' 

8s 

Dumber at , 

of ~y 

boku 

public hearings under, 

the pmvhiow of ch4gef 6+I3. R5'bTiSCl. Citi 

,crcslainn ras saw,wlr st ii.r 

AFFIDAV. IT OF PUBLICATION 

~. ., . . .. .. . . ., .. . .,~~. .. .. .x.. . . ~ .., . ..., . . .

. 

~ 

~ . .. . ... .. . . . .. ~. . , 

r~. ., . . . ... . .,... . 

, ... .. . . . . .+~y of .. . . . . . .. . . .. . 2o . . .. 

V01 .... . . ----140 . .. . .. . . .. . .. . . ... .. . . . . . _day of ... . . . .. .. . .

.

.. 20 . . .. , .. .Y . . ... . , .. .r~~ . . . . , .... . . .. . . . .. .. ... . .. . .day 

~. 

c~ ... . . . . . ..~ . . . . 

e ~.,. . . .. ._. . . . . .. . .W ... ., . . ... .r

.,a. . . ... . . . ..d~ of ... . . .... . ... 2t~ . . . . 

~. . .F . . . ..., . . .. .. .N~, .. . . . . . .,. . . .. . . . .^..<. . .. . .. . . .~ ~. . . ~. . .,., .. . .~ .

. . . 

vcI. . . . . . .. . . . . . .No . . ... . . . . . ,. . . .... . . . . _ . .. . .day af . . . . .. . . .. . . . .~.. . . 
Emlulm mAnu . 

am3 rrds"ions °f°mN»g 

(if i?xitk> of Nitrogen 

L:anltol Aw 

Box 176. ,k: 

Pvlissaowi 63 

tekpho»c (s73)751- 

U3. 'The vadmew, 

5o'[UOSts ]hr,on : 

int2x'Grtg 1U givc Vcrb32 ~ ft ItImol-of ** "b* 

tc,"limoriv to thc 

isvioa S~Mwy at 

oittrs 

TM 94 

20ON 

~ oopmunm 

*Ccw Wftm 

Ira( dw nvmd 

Also ! 

oc,py of 

heuing 

CIM 

I StwvAtal, A~w S%Ift 

Uioxidr (Mi Toding 

a Nrlai 

Ruk, Ao, 

clairu'l , of Nox 

10 csit 10-4,360 

Non-F-W,t Geocnrh4 

fj,r,crj&ng U14ts wd 

La~.isims r-n-K" 

F'rogmgm, 

f1mlatiow 

E"Miuk>M 

r~tsft Croo 

.'em ratt n 

Mtric 

Ca6s,ims 

conuvi 

lov=lotion, 

Mmoub Fiat 

Ig unitli; i 

way be Wo 

Vs. 

Agcucy'E, 

f(or uatka sushvrlt% 

csnnbr,tission 

Caraar,raa¢e 

by ft t+4issvun 

w _050, ktsmo . 

$1!k)te wVISStatiqn 

A) Clrwt tvtcvuty 

latiow 

urv e 

:"~.lFG~ gmdf 

bCx_ltlml3g in 201 

u7e mquired 

rdu.; 

S 

'gL3pOYCij Me 

acivntplish ttlsc goal try 

°~c~a~e~~ 

~$t7fff3, iiuNl 

b--R 

7dopEi 

htiSvutl 0 . tI1Gb5t 

Noun) k2lwtlre.cs' 

cwt ts tr~ 1 

07317 51- : 
R $... IVEi.F 

2686 NOV - 7 r iF 12: 5 7 

MT OF PUBLICATION 

STATE OF MWMRl 

CburtyofBoone 

4 sASHA McMILIM, being duly sworn according to Jaw, state that I am 

oneof d* pubhAars of dre Columbia Daily TnVww, a daily wwspapez of 

>&WItiOn in the CDunty of Boonc6 Staft of Missouri, where located-. 

which rwwspalmr has tan admitwd to 0* Post Ofte as poiadical class 

nul"W in the Ci,y of Columbia, ° . the City of publ¬mtioft; VAich 

newspaper W bm published replarly and -vely for a period 

tttr!ee years and has a !ist of boris fide lrem vrltmtatily 

such, who icavc paid of agrtW w V" a stated price fbr a su' -on for a 

demate period of time . and dsat such newspaper has caerVlie1 with Ow 

proisicm of Section 403.00, Revised starks of Missouri 2000, 

Swtion 59,31tt, Wad Statutes of Missouri 2000. The affixcd 

appeared in said nerwspaper on 1* fo99.cnving trt#rns isaam; 

tst irtsertion - -_ November 3,2006 

2nd Insertion 

Ird Insertion 

4th tnwtiora 

Sth hoertiom 

6th 

7sh kwalion 

" Insertion 

9th Insertion 

10(b Insertion 

130, 

12th Inserfion 

uWalion 

!4% l. 

19th Insertion 

1ft linwriion 

i?ttti Wertion 

1&th traspdtion 

1M tnscrtan 

~F ¢i 

V 

MISSOURI AIR coxsERVA7ION COMMISSION 

WRL HOID PUBLIC FEARING 

RFFMtSf,7N CTrY. MO -The Missouri Air cousw,aliaft 

Commission will bM a pab* kwulg on Cansundon Permits ay 

Rule ; Clean Air In Rok Annual, un3 sulfur Dioxide 

(SO2) Trading programs; Bmisdon, Limitations and Omissions Tradft 

of Oxides ottakrogen: Contvl otNOx i~ws. From Rlettrxc 

Gng Units and Non--ng BWkm Control of 

ing Urh~ and Sfift of 

Missouri ~ plan for uwtim inteaam and futforaftnem of 

National Ambient Air Qu*iity Standwcis an Thursday, Damther 7. 

2006. '11w Public Hmft mR ' at 4 a.rts. at ft Elm Street 

Confimm Center, 1,738 Boa Elm Svavt, lomr I&M. Rowing River 

Conference Rwm, hfieraw City, MO, The o ' on wiill hcwr 

testimony u1aw to dw £alkrvring role wtions . 

* tfiI CSR ia-6 .05.2 Cmrutruqdan Permits By RWe 

proposed Amendment wartsms die t1.& &° tz1 protectwo 

AgnWs (SPA's) conmu 0* On tu1C as wrIvm doesn't provide a 

"an review period PA isn"t la 

into tlre State tatim f1aa. L=VxW is being be added to stau 

&e aiep hu sevac, (7) dwyv to do a pre-eonsmwtion permit 

"° 14 CSR li?d.342 Clown Air tnunble Rule ATM" ldOrc ThAng 

PMFWM 

The U.S. Envirionmmxlal an Agnaefs (EPA) Clean Air 

Interstate Role required sums to develop rep1atioas to rW= Nohs 

emissions ftwn "c generatin g u» begirming in ZOO. This 

rule Wtl R=rnpliA ftaVo3 by including Missoasrt*: 

souma in de tagional trading progrw cstablisW by EPA, 

* 10 CSR It?-0ba4 Clean Air Interstate Rule ! NO% Ttaftg 
* 10 CSR F0-6.366 Clean Air Interstote Rule S02 Trading Program 

The Wi. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Clean Air Interstate Rule required states to develop regulations to reduce S02 emissions 

frpmt"loom gencrtiting units beginning in 2010~ This proposed ruic will itoonyalitih that gaal by including Missouri's affictcd sour= in the 

regime] trading program established by EPA. 

'° it# C"Stt 1 ¬1-6;35o Emission Lamitations and Etrussions, Trading of Oxides of Nitrogen 

This proM. cd $mrndsracnt would remsrvt the requirements of ft rule upon the irmplccnrntatican of proposed rule 10 CSR i".362 . "lU 

of t O CSR 113-6.362 am zriare, stringetie than this rule, 

" 10 CSR 1",360 Contra! of Nt3X Eatitissions Erarn Electric aling Units and Non-Ekcnic 'ng WI= 

This Proposed amendment would remove the requirements of this ruk upon 'srsaplemertrntaan ofVropoaed rule 10 CSR 10-6,362. The 

requirements of 10 CSR l"_362 are more stringent aluiaa Efiis irale, 

* 111' CSl'! lft-6,348 Control of Mercury Vraai,ssmons Frorn l:~Aeatic (3enersting Units 

The U.S . Faavironaar"ectai Pruwtion s (EPA) Clean Mercury Interstate Rule "ired states to develop TcgulYatioaas to reduce rrewury 

emissions fivrs slectrie gfflee xtfrig ~na~x beginning in 2010. This proposed raett will accomplish tttat goal by including Missouri's af%cted 

regional irading, program established by EPA, 

' Misaturi Swe Impletrue'ntatton Plain - State oCminnuri Plan for Implementation, Mtr'snlcnance aied Eaafarverrent of Nadienal Ambient Air 

Quality Standards 

The Purpose of tWs document is to fulfill the reqtri of section 110 of the lwedaral 0cm Air Art iktttctxdmerits (CAAA) of 1990. 

Section 110 of the CAAA roquirics Oat each state submit to the Adininist ¬aw of ft US. jkntriraerscsntal Protection Agency (EPA) x Platt, 

the itnplesrenta3ic^n, rtainumanee and ea3furc=snt of ft National NttbiM Air Qkalm Standards in every air quality region within da,esiasc . 

This plan demtaonsia°atts ft continued attainment uf1h : primary and secncCdaTy standards for 94-tour azoae and for Fl'vi3,5. 

The above documents aiH6 be available !'or review at the following locations : Missouri Ihpartraaetst of Natural Resources, Air Pollution 

Control am, 1659 Ebn S't,tceR, .feffegsan City, (573) ?3148t7 ; Kansas City Regional {lffim 5W NE 'Gullim Road, laels Summit, (111G) 

622"740U ; Northeast &e' Office, 1709 Prospect lkiw% Matce, (W) 36.5,2129 ; Southeast Regional t3ft1w, 2155 l+l_ Wesg+xood 

Boulevard, Poplar BUT, (S'73) 8AU-9?S(1; St. Lvais Regional Office, 7545 :a . Witrcliar&Sazrte 210, SL Louis. (314) 411-2960; Soaotinwcst 

kegiotal Office. 2040 wr. Woodland, Sprarcgfielf, (417) 891 43QQ. 

with disabilities requiring stecinl services Or awrnmodataons to attend the meeting can nuke arrangements by calling ttw t 

tly at (5°7z) 751-7840, ft Cs 1o11 free -number at (900) 334-tiW, or by writing two weeks in advance of the " taNtissoitre Department of Natural Resources, Air Conservation +C ` sion * , f'_0. Box 176, ,lef'Cet" City, M{3 6r3! 102. Hewing 

i,rTsir~cl pers~ta t~yaon~cttl~e irro~emttro~~t May Missouri, ~8~~ 7;~5-294b. 

°1'1e commissarara holds public heariaap under the provisions ofcltalita 643. WsMa. Citizens wishing to speak at ft public hewing should 

notify the sectctasy Gta the Mimun Air Conservation Commission, Missouri DcpaitmentofTtistiurat RMurces. Air "lutiorr Control l"roparn, 

P.O. Box 176, ict'feasan City, Missouri 65102-0 176, or telephone (573) ?ii-'#t,40, 'fhe &V=tsm++t requ" pemms intending 1i give -,Trlbal, 

provide su ,~, "~ 'm *opy of ti'wiir testimOny to the commission secretary at the time of Ow public lwaring'l'kte depmrtrtertt also 

wrstt accept written commerit~1 r ~r 1'i a rmard Lmcil S p.m on Illectsnbea M 2006; pkase mud two a*es of wtitutn ccste,rten¬s to C."lnt1~ 

OptraEicarts 5erctic,m, Air 1'olluti _tn Control P.O. Box 1'T6, Jefftnon CA ty, MO 65102-0176 . 

Pule proposals considered at Ns hewing nay 6e adopted by the Missouri Air Conservation Caasunissiara As provided for under autloat~r of 

643.050, RShrta. For more information or a complete mecting sgeada, inctifiingruks being pms+attcd for adep6mconlact the Missouri 

Department of Natural Resources' Air Pollution Control Program at (573) 751-4917 . 

INSERTION DATE; November 3,2006, 

Columbia Daily Tribune A d&K of Publication Page 2 Printees Fee: $ 201.37 
AFFIDAVIT OF PU13LICATION 

STATE OF MISSOURI 

COUNTY OF ADAIR 

L Larry '9V" . Freels, being duly sworn, according to law, state that I am the Publisher of Kirks+rille Daily Express. a daily newspaper of general circulation in the County of Adair, State of Missouri, where located; which newspaper has been admitted to the Post Office " periodical class matter in the City Of Nirlsville, b4issouri, the city of publication; which newspaper has be= published ~egulatrt~ ~nd ee~s~ttti ve ly f bTa -- , ' 

voluraWly engaged as such who 

definite period of 

Wree years and has a list of bow fide subscribers, 

Or agreed to PAY a stated price for a subscription for a 

493.050. Revised Statutes 

2000. The affixed notice appeared in said newspaper in the fatlowing consecutive issues . 

First Insertion Vo1. 105, No. 263, 6th day of November 

Subscribed arid swom to before me on this h~ day of 

~e f ~'v'~..1f C.-1 f1 Wa .. . T:-1.. 

a . c+aaax ~` A 4ilJAllr legal ran ,page 2. My Conwriissiott Expire,5 February 21, 20p7. 

per has complied with the provisions of Section 

, and Section 59,310, lt.evis~d St~ttzt~s ~fMissouri 

Publication Fee $388.13 
4 

. 

. 

MISSOURI AIA CONSERVATIQN IMtlN 

WILL HOLD PUBLIC HEMING 

JEFFERSON CITY, MO ~ The Missouri At Conservation 

Commission will hold a public hearing on C;onatnuction Permits By 

Rule ; Clean Air Irtos¬ale Rule Annual, Smonxdp and Sulfur 

Dioxide ~~~~~ Tr~dlll~ Prorarf~6* Emission Limitations and 

Emissions Traa N ~ c>rc~ias Nilraqon ; Con" of N{}x Ennistians 

From Electric- Generating Units and PbnaseIric Generating 

Bo'1ler% Control of Mercury Emissions From Electric Getieredng 

Unk, and State of At'~ssoun Plan for ImpWantadan, Maintenance 

at National Ambient Ak Quaifty Standards an 

r 7, 2406. The P'ube Hearing will be* at 9 

~ Elm Street Canierance Ceni> 1738 East am Street. 

River Corkrence Room, Jefferson City, MO. 

hear tastirnpny related to the following rule 

Thu 

Larrver I", . 

The 

actions. , 

10 CSR 10-s.o62 Constnctin Permits By Rule 

ment addresses the U.S . ErrvirarmWal 

cy's ffA's) soncemc that the wle as wdtten 

dew pre-aanstructfior+ rWew period and ilhereisil't ~ppmwatalo Into the St~ I nt~ Plan, 

i~ tr~rg b® added to sW the department has wm 

do s pre-construction permit review. 

10 CSR tt}~6 .382 Clean Air Interstate Rule Annual NQx Tradng 

Program 

'" The U.S . t:nvironm+3nnt~ Protection ' s (EPA) Clean Ai,r 

I Rule 'r~d states to dove . ufations to reduce 

NOX emissions from electric g ing units eginnfng h 20,09. 

This proposed rule .wfil accomplish that by Inal~ng 

is~rlls affected sources In the reg tradi~ program 

sd try EPA. 

SR 1t,F-6.364 Glean Air Interstate Rule, Seasonal NOx 

The U.S . Emiranawtal P n~ction s (EPA) Clean A~ 

Interstate Rule required stetes to cleve re,gulatx~ to reduce 

N(3x emissions from electric ge ° units baonning in 2009. 

This proposed rde will acoarrrplish that aal by Including 

~1 affected ~r~~ In the ' ~ trading program 

established by EPA. . . 

14 CSR 1 q-6,31*CISan k Interstate Rule S02Tra*g Program 

The U.S, Environmental ftlection 

Interstate Rule tsqui~+ed slates to 

S(h , . ' from electric qi 

.Prop4~ed ruRev~l --- , Di# 

Nl~ao~ "~d sources in 

established by,EPA. 

(EPA) Clean Air 

ations to reduce 

girtning in 20% 

by Including 

10 CSR 10-6 .360 Control ol NOx Emissions From Ek* 

Generating Units and Non- Electric Generating Boilers 

10 CSR 1M350 Emission Limitations and Emissions Tm(ling of 

O)ddes of Nitrogen 

This proposed amendment would remove the requirements of 

t#is ruts upon the Implernentatian qt propoW rule 1{1 CSR 10-

6,362. The requirements of 1{i CSS 10-tf .962 am more W" 

than this rde. , 

'this proposed amendment would remove ft requirements Of 

this rule upon the impiomentation of proposed rule 10 CSR % 

6362, The reorennents of iQ CSS 1G-6.382 are mom stringent 

than this rula: 

14 CSA 1 t}~6.368 Control of Mercury Ernissicns From Electric 

Generating Units 

Pap 2 

The '-U.9~ ErnrI I PrcWlon cYs (EPA) Clesi 

Mercury Interstate Rule required states to deve regulgtfar` t 

redaoe mercury ' fram efec~ er2g units t~r a 

t1~9 in 2Qit1. Th~ Pf0P090d rule VAN ish that t 

" ~souri"s Acted s aurs~s In the re a ~nal trading pro 

aftIlsheci by EPA, 

` Ml8111a0d $1310 Irnpl$n`1I"tW3on Plan - State d Missouri Plan r 

Implementation, I)WItenanee. and E 

Ambient Air Quality Standards 

The, pwpow of ft document is to- WIN the 

Section 110 of the Federal Clean AirAct Ameridrr- ts¬CAAuc a 

1990. Section 110 ofthe CAAR1 .requires th 

to the Admlrristrator of the U.S, Environmental 

(EPA) a an ~r.the 

ment of the National 

quality rogiiat within !t* state, 

nrr~ent at the prime 

hour ozone and'for pA+l2.& 

The above dacurneo wib locations: MisW 

Control Program, 1660 Elm 

Ks~s C~+r E~ ` t~, 5~. N~ ~lbem ~c~ t,oWs sarn . ) 022. 000; .WcRrthii%at - ' ¬ fte,1709 Prospect DI 

---- autheaat 8 ~rtal-~ , 21'~- I 29,~ S R 

W d - rd, Popf~ ~~~ ~~` 8~-~T~; St Ltwk "_-'orral O fte , 7545 S, L I nd ae rg , Suite 210, St. Louis, (314 ),,4 + 4 

W. Woodland , .~n~ t~ } 2~1 (417)e914300 . 

with [tisatliGies reoft special Services or acoommodata attend the mealIng 

tlt r~l y 

can ~ arrangements by calling , . ~ ....__ " r~ly at (ST~I 751-7W Ow ciep artmahre toll t j 3348K ex by.vrrldng 1twm wet -^ .-, ---11 The ir~ t Missouri ~ 6¬ bat~1 i~esourc ; t~aneommissian E S ` , P.O. Box 

MO 6610Z HOW" Impaired 

through Relay MISS04 (800) 29~. . 

The o holds public- unddisrtf~ptovIs ,- _ _. $a~ Q~, RSAp. -wow to ap~sJ~ atthe-pats~ 

notdy , thlr secretary to' the rI ~Ir~ at 

, Missouri ~- 1 ai iV~uret Flesc~rcae, _..r 

Pollution Cear~l Program, .Q~Bvx 176, Jefferson Ctp; ~i~rt 65tt32-0f76, or telephone ` _ 

r~ s k~tdi~ to 

vide e n co~ry of, their 

at the time o# tt---_ . ..,. 

~m~ 

Rule -proposals considleted et __,. . ._~ . . .~ 

`rf,IGr rvation CttitniWon' ~ 

~~'t~ ~.~~-St~. Far more 'k" trae~ln~ a, ~It~ng na~s be" presents 

tact th~. . . . 

Control 
PUBLIC ]HEARING 1207/2006i 

T.1RI AIR CONSERVATION COM14ISSION 

STATE OF MISSOURI 

3 

PUBLIC HEARING 

TRANSCRIPT OF" PROCEEDINGS 

Thursday, December 7, 2006 

5 :0C7 a .m . 

Elm Street Conference Center 

12 1738 Fast Elm Street 

12 Jefferson City, 

14 

1 5 COMMISSIONERS PRESENT : 

16 ::GIrzIni ssioner Jack Raker, Chair 

Commissioner Micbael Foresman 

17 Commissioner Mark A. Fohey 

c:o,missiorer Kevin L . Rosenbohm 

18 Commissioner Richard Rocha 

Commissioner Mark Garnett 

19 

REPORTED BY : ~ 9"fona s ie S. VanP,aC.~ntF 4.rC3'S, CSR, 

21 Midwest !Ati.gation Services 

3432 W . Trum= Boulevard, Suite 207 

22 Jefferson City, Mo 65!09 

) 636-7551 

9 

25 

MWWEST LITIGATION SERVICES 

t1itiptie+n.cam Phone: i .S"a80*DM(337b) Fax: 314.br44.133d 

-39- 
I rule . 

The Department utilized a great deal of 

diplomacy and negotiation to make this possible . And 

should extend that 

5 e meet 

who T know are here 

oday as well as the Energy Center I notice 

is here today as well . So that commendation !Dlic'.,uld be 

M. 

0 This does conclude my corcuRenLs on these rules . 

if there are any questions, T' d be happy to try and 

address them at this time . 

11. COMMISSIONER BAKER : An 

12 for Michael? 

13 ~0,Mh:TISSIONER FOHRY : No . 

COMMISSIONER BAKER: Okay . 

MR . JAY : Thank you . 

: Okay, 

dy have any questions 

1 "? comments, and thanks on a job well done . 

18 the list would be Paul McConnell, 

IELL,, 

next one or 

being first duly sworn to testify the . truth., the whole 

truth, and nothing but the- truth, testified as follows. 

. MCCONI'3ELL : Chairman, Members of the 

Commission, MY name is Paul McConnel7. . I am employed 

1.lution Control Program as an Environmental 

25 Engineer . I work at 1.659 East 81m Street, 

IM+++. Wt'AT, LITIGA'nON SERVICES 

www.tWdd1"eMUpt1onr~."om Phone, 1.80.280 .DEPO(3376) Fax: 

-40- 
9 1?3e1~~4., s.irattikl1vLT 1LdlO.l+ttV1R 

1'm here to present this proposed revision to 

the Missouri State Tmplementation Plan, SIP . 

title is Implementation, Maintenan.c 

National Ambient Air Quality Standards . 

310(a)a Tmplemenwat 

Quality Standards, or NAAQS, new and revised eight-hour 

ozone and fine 

The pl an 

This proposed change to the SIP will update 

late matter of PM2 .5 

This proposed plan action as on page 275 of the 

ly finalized . 

briefing document . 

vo 1 Lure . 

element has not been repr 

due to it 

available 

Resources 

Jefferson 

available 

However, the complete Missouri STP 

criteria pollutant National AMbiEML Air 

Plan requirements, 

ecl in the briefing document 

The entire -- the entire document 

review at the Department of NaLural 

Air Pollution Control Program, P .O . Box 

City, Missouri, 65102-wQ176 . 

online at 

http : / /mAq .dnr .mv.govr' 

Background Ozone . 

It is also 

1?6, 

as 

Agency IEPA) established in 1971 a national primary and 

maximum one-hour I^1AAQS ozone standard of .08 

once per year . 

. That is not to be exceeded more than 

MIDWEST LUIGATION SERVICES 

wwwmddwetfili8atWLc0rn 1hom:1.8ftM.DEP0(33']6) Fax: 314.644.1334 r 

-41- 
APPENDIX E 

6.5 Appendix E December 7, 2006 Public Hearing 

Comments and Responses 
COMMENTS AND RESPONSES ON 

PROPOSED REVISIONS TO 

THE STATE OF MISSOURI PLAN FOR 

IMPLEMENTATION, MAINTENANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OF 

NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS 

On December 7, 2006, the Missouri Air Conservation Commission held a public hearing 

concerning a proposed revision to the Missouri State Implementation Plan (SIP) for the 

Implementation, Maintenance and Enforcement of National Ambient Air Quality 

Standards (NAAQS) plan. The following is a summary of comments received and the 

Missouri Department of Natural Resources' corresponding responses. Any changes to 

the proposed SIP are identified in the responses to comments. 

SUMMARY OF COMMENTS : The Missouri Department of Natural Resources' Air 

Pollution Control Program received five (5) comments from the U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency (EPA). EPA comments relate to clarifying the submission as it 

pertains to 110(a)(2)(D)(i) . EPA also commented that they are reserving comments on 

the remainder of this plan until such time that EPA provides further guidance on aspects 

of 110 (other than Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)) . 

COMMENT: The EPA suggests that Missouri separate the section of this document that 

specifically addresses Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) from submittal and submit this portion 

separately to EPA for inclusion into the SIP. By separating out the portion of the 

submittal dealing with 110(a)(2)(D)(i), Missouri will be able to clearly address EPA's 

finding made in April 2005 that states failed to make statutorily required plan 

submissions addressing 110(a)(2)(D)(i) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) pertaining to 

interstate transport. 

In regards to the portion of the SIP submittal which addresses all other requirements of 

110(a)(1) and (2), Missouri's SIP submission addressing the 8-hour ozone NAAQS is due 

on December 15, 2007 and the PMZ.s NAAQS is due on October 5, 2008 . As indicated in 

the August 2006 EPA guidance, the Agency intends to provide states with additional 

information concerning the elements of this SIP submittal, in separate regulations or 

guidance documents. 

RESPONSE: Separating the section of this document that addresses Section 

110(a)(2)(D)(i) would result in a disjointed document that is intended to address Section 

11 0(a) requirements. When additional guidance is available for all other requirements of 

110(a)(1) and (2), this plan will be reviewed and any revisions deemed necessary will be 

made as a revision to this document. Therefore, no changes have been made to this plan 

as a result of this comment. However, there were language changes made as a result of 

other comments to clarify which section of the document specifically addresses the 

requirements of 110(a)(2)(D)(i) of the CAA and to identify the elements the CAA 

requires to be addressed. 

-43- 
COMMENT: The EPA suggests that a short background section be included in the 

portion of the document that addresses 110(a)(2)(D)(i) to provide an explanation of this 

separate submittal. 

RESPONSE: Since a separate submittal is not planned for the section of the document 

that addresses 110(a)(2)(D)(i), a separate background is not necessary since the Executive 

Summary in the plan covers background information. Therefore, no changes have been 

made to this plan as a result of this comment. 

COMMENT: The EPA also commented that headings should be included in the section 

of the document that addresses 110(a)(2)(D)(i) of the CAA to clearly identify the 

elements required to be addressed (such as significant contribution, visibility protection 

and prevention of significant deterioration). 

RESPONSE AND EXPLANATION OF CHANGE: As a result of this comment, 

headings have been added to identify the elements required to be addressed under 

110(a)(2)(D)(i) of the CAA. These headings are : Visibility Protection, Prevention of 

Significant Deterioration, and Significant Contribution . 

COMMENT: For the portion of 110(a)(2)(D)(i) which addresses prevention of 

significant deterioration, EPA suggests providing further clarification that Missouri's 

permitting regulations for the 8-hour ozone nonattainment area are consistent with EPA's 

Phase 1 and Phase 2 8-hour ozone implementation rule or will be revised to be consistent 

when Missouri submits the ozone plan due June 15, 2007. Also, the document should 

further state that Missouri is implementing, in the absence of a final PM Z.s 

implementation rule, an interim PMa.s program that involves implementing Prevention of 

Significant Deterioration (PSD) and Nonattainment New Source Review (NNSR) 

programs for PMio as a surrogate for the PMz.s requirements. 

RESPONSE AND EXPLANATION OF CHANGE: As a result of this comment, the 

document language has been amended to more clearly define the program's intent to 

adopt EPA's regulations and policies related to changes in the implementation of the 

NAAQS. All major sources located in attainment areas in the State of Missouri are 

currently subject to PSD permitting under state rule 10 CSR 10-6.060 Construction 

Permits Required section (8). Major sources located in nonattainment areas are currently 

regulated under a NNSR permitting program required by state rule 10 CSR 10-6.060 

Construction Permits Required section (7). Missouri believes that the current rule 10 

CSR 10-6.060 Construction Permits Required rule meets the requirements of the Phase lI 

ozone implementation rule as St. Louis is classified as a moderate ozone nonattainment 

area. Missouri will follow EPA's most current policy on the implementation of all PSD 

and NNSR regulations as they relate to the implementation of the NAAQS. Missouri will 

also adopt EPA's revised regulations implementing the revisions to the NAAQS as 

expeditiously as possible . This will include the adoption of permitting requirements into 

the state permitting rules as soon as possible . 

COMMENT: For the portion of 110(a)(2)(D)(i) which addresses visibility protection, 

EPA suggests that the language be revised to state -- At this time, Missouri is assessing 

whether there is any interference with measures in another state designed to protect 

-44- 
visibility for the 8-hour ozone and PMZ.s NAAQS. Missouri is assessing visibility 

protection in conjunction with the Regional Haze SIP. 

RESPONSE AND EXPLANATION OF CHANGE: In response to this comment, the 

language under the Visibility Protection portion of the plan has been changed to further 

describe how Missouri is addressing visibility protection . EPA has made no 

determination that emissions from any state interfere with 1980 visibility plan measures 

required to be included in a plan to address reasonably attributable visibility impairment . 

EPA is not aware of any certification of existing reasonably attributable impairment of 

visibility by a Federal Land Manager that has not already been resolved. Based on this 

information, no source in Missouri emits pollutants that interfere with measures included 

in visibility plans under 1980 regulations. At this time, Missouri's current 

nonattainment/maintenance plans for the 8-hour ozone and PM2,5 NAAQS are under 

development. It is expected that these plans will benefit visibility protected areas in 

Missouri and other neighboring states . This is primarily due to the inclusion of NOX and 

S02 controls under the Clean Air Interstate Rule and NOX SIP call regulations. Also, 

Missouri is working with the Central States Regional Air Partnership (CENRAP) 

regional planning organization in development of a regional haze plan that is due to be 

submitted to EPA December 2007. This on-going regional haze plan development 

process is intended to address incoming visibility impairing pollutants from sources in 

other states and Missouri source contribution on Missouri Class I areas as well as other 

states' protected areas. 

The document has not been reprinted in the briefing document due to its volume. The 

entire document is available for review at the Missouri Department of Natural Resources' 

Air Pollution Control Program, 1659 East Elm Street, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 

65102-0176. It is also available online at 

http ://www.dnr .m"ov/env/apc /sp tatenlanrevisions htm. 
APPENDIX F 

6.6 Appendix F MACC Adoption Certification 
Pursuant to 643.055 R.SMa, the Missouri Air Conservation Commission has 

determined that this action is needed to have a U.S . Environmental Protection 

Agency approved State Implementation Plax . 

i Plan for Implementation, Maintenance, and Enforcement of 

National Ambient Air Quality Standards is hereby adopted by the Missouri Air 

Conservation Commission this I st day of February, 2007. 

Member 

Member 

Member 
APPENDIX G 

6.7 Appendix G 8-Hour Ozone and Particulate Matter 2.5 

Area Designations 

Air Quality Designations and Classifications for the 8-Hour Ozone 

National Ambient Air Quality Standards; Early Action Compact Areas With 

Deferred Effective Dates 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 

ACTION : Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This rule sets forth the air quality designations and 

classifications for every area in the United States, including Indian 

country, for the 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality standard . We 

are issuing this rule so that citizens will know whether the air where 

they live and work is healthful or unhealthful and to establish the 

boundaries and classifications for areas designated as nonattainment. 

Children are at risk when exposed to ozone pollution because their 

lungs are still developing, people with existing respiratory disease 

are at risk, and even healthy people who are active outdoors can 

experience difficulty breathing when exposed to ozone pollution. In 

this document, EPA is also promulgating the first deferral of the 

effective date, to Sept. 30, 2005, of the nonattainment designation 

for Early Action Compact areas that have met all milestones through 

March 31, 2004. Finally, we are inviting states to submit by July 15, 

2004, requests to reclassify areas if their design value falls within 

five percent of a high or lower classification . This rule does not 

establish or address state and tribal obligations for planning and 

control requirements which apply to nonattainment areas for the 8-hour 

ozone air quality standard . Two separate rules, one of which is also published 

today, set forth the planning and control requirements which apply to 

nonattainment areas for this standard . The second rule will be 

published at a later date. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: This final rule is effective on June 15, 2004. 

" 27. In Sec. 81 .326, the table entitled "Missouri--Ozone (8-Hour 

Standard)" is added to read as follows: 

Sec. 81 .326 Missouri. 

-48- 
Missouri-8-Hour Ozone Standard 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 

Designated Area Designation (A.)° (1 .) 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 

Kansas City, MO: 

Cass County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unclassifiable (B.) 

Clay County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., Unclassifiable (B.) 

Jackson County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unclassifiable (B.) 

Platte County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unclassifiable (B .) 

St. Louis, MO: 

Franklin County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Jefferson County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., 

St. Charles County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

St. Louis City. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

St. Louis County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Nonattainment. . . . . . . 

Nonattainment. . . . . . . . . 

Nonattainment. . . . . . . . . 

Nonattainment. . . . . . . . . 

Nonattainment. . . . . . . . . 

Subpart 2/Moderate. 

Subpart 2/Moderate. 

Subpart 2/Moderate. 

Subpart 2/Moderate. 

Subpart 2/Moderate. 

AQCR 094 Metro Kansas City Interstate : Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Buchanan County 

Ray County 

AQCR 137 N. Missouri Intrastate (part) : 

Pike County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Ralls County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

AQCR 137 N. Missouri Intrastate . . . . . . . . . . 

Remainder of State: 

Adair County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Andrew County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Atchison County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Audrain County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., 

Boone County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Caldwell County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Callaway County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Carroll County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Chariton County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Clark County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Clinton County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Cole County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Cooper County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Daviess County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., . . . . .  

DeKalb County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Gentry County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Grundy County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Harrison County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

-49- 
Missouri-8-Hour Ozone Standard (Continued) 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Designated Area Designation (`'.)' (1 .) 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 

_ _ 

. . ~ . . , . . 

Holt County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Howard County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Knox County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Lewis County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Lincoln County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Linn County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Livingston County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Macon County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Marion County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Mercer County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Moniteau County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Monroe County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Montgomery County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Nodaway County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Osage County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Putnam County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Randolph County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Saline County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Schuyler County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Scotland County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Shelby County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Sullivan County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Warren County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Worth County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Rest of State: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Barry County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Barton County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Bates County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Benton County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Bollinger County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Butler County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Camden County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Cape Girardeau County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Carter County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Cedar County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Christian County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Crawford County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Dade County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Dallas County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Dent County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Douglas County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unclassifiable/Attainment 

-50- 
Missouri-8-Hour Ozone Standard (Continued) 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 

Designated Area Designation (A.)° (I .) 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 

Dunklin County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Gasconade County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Greene County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Henry County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Hickory County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Howell County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Iron County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Jasper County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Johnson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Laclede County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Lafayette County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Lawrence County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Madison County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Maries County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

McDonald County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Miller County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Mississippi County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Morgan County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

New Madrid County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Newton County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Oregon County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Ozark County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Pemiscot County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Perry County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Pettis County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Phelps County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Polk County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Pulaski County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Reynolds County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Ripley County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

St. Clair County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

St. Francois County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Ste. Genevieve County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Scott County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Shannon County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Stoddard County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Stone County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Taney County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Texas County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attairunent 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Vernon County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unclassifiable/Attairunent 

Washington County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Wayne County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unclassifiable/Attainment 

-51- 
Missouri-8-Hour Ozone Standard (Continued) 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Designated Area Designation (A.), (1 .) 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Webster County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unclassifiable/Attainment 

Wright County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unclassifiable/Attainment 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A' Includes Indian Country located in each county or area, except as otherwise specified. 

B~ This area is given an " Unclassifiable" designation. EPA will review all available 

information and make an attainment or nonattainment decision after reviewing the 2004 

data. 

1~ This date is June 15, 2004, unless otherwise noted 

Particulate Matter 2.5 Area Designations 

[Federal Register : January 5, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 3)] 

[Rules and Regulations] 

[Page 943-1019] 

From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] 

[DOCID: fr05j a05-21 ] 

[[Page 944]] 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 81 

[OAR-2003-0061 ; FRL-7856-1] 

RIN-2060-AM04 

Air Quality Designations and Classifications for the Fine 

Particles (PM2,5) National Ambient Air Quality Standards 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This rule sets forth the initial air quality designations and 

classifications for all areas in the United States, including Indian 

country, for the fine particles (PM2,5) National Ambient Air Quality 

Standards (NAAQS). The EPA is issuing this rule so that citizens will 

know whether the air quality where they live and work is healthful or 

unhealthful. Health studies have shown significant associations between 

-52- 
exposure to PM2,5 and premature death from heart or lung disease. Fine 

particles can also aggravate heart and lung diseases and have been 

linked to effects such as cardiovascular symptoms, cardiac arrhythmias, 

heart attacks, respiratory symptoms, asthma attacks, and bronchitis. 

These effects can result in increased hospital emissions, emergency 

room visits, absences from school or work, and restricted activity days . 

Individuals that may be particularly sensitive to PM2.5 exposure 

include people with heart or lung disease, older adults, and children . 

This rule establishes the boundaries for areas designated as 

nonattainment, unclassifiable, or attainment/unclassifiable . This rule 

does not establish or address State and Tribal obligations for planning 

and control requirements that apply to nonattainment areas for the 

PM2.5 standards. The EPA will publish a separate rule which will set 

forth the planning and control requirements that apply to nonattainment 

areas for the PM2.5 standards. 

DATES: The effective date of this rule is April 5, 2005. 

- 27 . In Sec. 81 .326, the table entitled "Missouri.-PM2.5" is added 

to the end of the section to read as follows: 

Sec. 81 .326 Missouri . 

Missouri-PM2,5 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

Designated area Designation (A .)° (1 .) 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

St. Louis, MO: 

Franklin County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Jefferson County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., . 

St. Charles County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

St. Louis County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

St. Louis City. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Rest of State: 

Adair County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Andrew County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Atchison County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Audrain County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Barry County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Barton County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Bates County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Benton County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Bollinger County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Boone County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Nonattainment. 

Nonattainment. 

Nonattainment. 

Nonattainment. 

Nonattainment. 

Unclassifiable/Attainment. 

Unclassifiable/Attainment. 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

-53- 
Missouri-PM2,5 (Continued) 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

Designated area Designation (A.)' (1 .) 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

Buchanan County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Butler County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Caldwell County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Callaway County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Camden County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Cape Girardeau County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Carroll County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Carter County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Cass County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Cedar County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Chariton County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Christian County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Clark County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Clay County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Clinton County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Cole County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Cooper County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Crawford County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Dade County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Dallas County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Daviess County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

DeKalb County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Dent County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Douglas County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Dunklin County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Gasconade County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Gentry County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Greene County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Grundy County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Harrison County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Henry County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Hickory County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Holt County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Howard County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Howell County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Iron County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Jackson County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Jasper County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Johnson County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Knox County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Laclede County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Lafayette County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment. 

Unclassifiable/Attainment. 

Unclassifiable/Attainment. 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment. 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment. 

Unclassifiable/Attainment. 

Unclassifiable/Attainment. 

Unclassifiable/Attainment. 

Unclassifiable/Attainment. 

Unclassifiable/Attainment. 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment. 

Unclassifiable/Attainment. 

Unclassifiable/Attainment. 

Unclassifiable/Attainment. 

Unclassifiable/Attainment. 

Unclassifiable/Attainment. 

Unclassifiable/Attainment. 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment. 

-54- 
Missouri.-PM2,5 (Continued) 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

Designated area Designation (A)^ (1) 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

Lawrence County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Lewis County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Lincoln County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Linn County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Livingston County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

McDonald County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., . 

Macon County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Madison County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Maries County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Marion County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Mercer County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Miller County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Mississippi County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Moniteau County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Monroe County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Montgomery County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Morgan County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

New Madrid County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Newton County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Oregon County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Osage County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Ozark County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Pemiscot County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Perry County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Pettis County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Phelps County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Pike County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Platte County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Polk County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Pulaski County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Putnam County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Ralls County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Randolph County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Ray County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Reynolds County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Ripley County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

St. Clair County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

St. Genevieve County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

St. Francois County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Saline County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Schuyler County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment. 

Unclassifiable/Attainment. 

Unclassifiable/Attainment. 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment. 

Unclassifiable/Attainment. 

Unclassifiable/Attainment. 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment. 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

-55- 
Missouri.-PM2,5 (Continued) 

Scotland County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Designated area Designation (A)° (1) 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

Scott County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Shannon County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Shelby County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Stoddard County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Stone County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Sullivan County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Taney County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Texas County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Vernon County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Warren County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Washington County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Wayne County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Webster County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Worth County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Wright County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment. 

Unclassifiable/Attainment. 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment . 

Unclassifiable/Attainment. 

Unclassifiable/Attainment. 

Unclassifiable/Attainment. 

Unclassifiable/Attainment. 

Unclassifiable/Attainment. 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A, Includes Indian Country located in each county or area, except as otherwise specified. 

'' This date is 90 days after January 5, 2005, unless otherwise noted. 
APPENDIX H 

6.8 Appendix H Missouri Air Quality Monitors Data 

for Years 2003, 2004 and 2005 

8-Hour Design Values 

4th High 8-hr 

Avera e b 

Design Value I 

Missouri 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 01-03 02-04 03-05 

Arnold 86 93 82 70 92 87 81 81 

West Alton 85 99 91 77 89 91 89 85 

Orchard Farm 88 98 90 76 92 92 88 86 

Blair St. 89 na 

Mar aretta 80 98 90 72 91 89 86 84 

Sunset Hills 88 98 88 70 89 91 85 82 

Maryland Hts 88 na 

Pacific 87 na 

Bonne Terre 75 92 83 70 84 83 81 79 

I Fole 89 na 

Illinois 

Jerse ille 84 100 83 73 83 89 85 79 

Alton 82 94 89 74 91 88 85 84 

M ille 73 90 88 78 88 83 85 84 

Wood River 78 84 83 73 87 81 80 81 

Houston 77 85 77 64 74 79 75 71 

East St. Louis 78 93 79 73 94 83 81 82 

Missouri 

Libert y 79 87 88 71 88 84 82 82 

Watkins Mill 73 83 85 67 79 80 78 77 

Rock Creek 91 88 69 87 na na 81 

RG South 72 83 82 61 81 79 75 74 

Trimble 71 87 79 

Kansas 

Wyandotte 

CO 

76 80 84 63 79 80 75 75 

U.S 

Penitentiary 

82 66 77 75 

Heritage Park 81 66 81 76 

-57- 
Springfield 

Hillcrest H.S. 71 74 72 64 77 72 70 71 

Outstate 

Mark Twain 76 85 71 61 75 77 72 69 

Eldorado S s 74 82 80 71 79 78 77 

I 

76 

Farrar 66 79 - 1 na 

Annual PM2.5 Total Mass for 2002-2005 

24-hr Std = 65 gg/m3 Design Values 

98th percentile 

98th percentile 

St. Louis 2002 2003 2004 2005 02-04 03-05 

West Alton 35 .0 35.5 30.2 38.5 33.6 34.7 

Margaretta 35 .5 31 .5 26 .5 40.0 31 .2 32 .7 

Blair Street 36.5 32.0 27 .9 40.3 32.1 33 .4 

South Broadway 36.5 33.2 28 .5 38.6 32.7 33 .4 

Mound Street 35 .9 33.2 30.3 40.8 33.1 34.8 

Clayton 36.9 33.2 33 .7 43 .5 34 .6 36.8 

Sunset Hills 34.0 30.5 32 .6 38.3 32 .4 33 .5 

Arnold 46.5 37 .2 34.8 41 .7 39 .5 37.9 

Kansas City 

Liberty 30.3 28 .1 26.5 31 .2 28 .3 28.6 

Troost 34.0 31 .4 27.3 34.2 30.9 31 .0 

UMKC 30.1 34.1 27.3 34.0 30.5 31 .8 

RG- South 26 .0 29.8 22.7 31 .4 26.2 28.0 

Outstate 

El Dorado Springs 28 .9 27.3 25.7 33.1 27.3 28.7 

Mark Twain St. 29 .0 29.3 21 .9 32 .3 26.7 27.8 

Pk. 

Ste. Genevieve 34.2 33 .8 25.8 36.1 31 .3 31 .9 

MSU 27.8 29.4 26.6 33 .6 27.9 29.9 

St. Joseph 30.9 28.2 32.0 35 .1 30.4 31 .8 

Columbia 29.3 30.6 25.4 34.7 28.4 30.2 

Annual Mean Std = 15.0 gg/m3 Design Values 

Annual Mean 

St. Louis 2002 2003 2004 2005 02-04 03-05 

West Alton 14.0 14.0 11 .9 15.2 13 .3 13 .7 

Margaretta 14.3 13 .5 12.1 15.1 13 .3 13 .6 

Blair Street 15.4 14.1 13 .1 16.1 14.2 14.4 

South Broadway 15.3 14 .4 13 .4 15.9 14.4 14.6 

-58- 
Mound Street 15.6 14.7 13 .1 15.9 * * 

Clayton 14.6 13.6 12.6 15.5 13 .6 13 .9 

Sunset Hills 13 .0 13.0 11 .9 15 .5 12 .6 13 .5 

Arnold 15 .1 13.9 12 .5 15 .4 13 .8 13 .9 

Kansas City 

Liberty 12.3 11 .7 9 .5 12.2 11 .2 11 .1 

Troost 14.0 13 .1 12 .0 14.1 13.1 13 .1 

UMKC 13 .3 12.7 11 .0 12 .5 12.4 12.1 

RG- South 11 .7 11 .1 9.8 11 .6 10.9 10.9 

Outstate 

El Dorado Springs 11 .8 11 .4 9.9 12 .1 11 .0 11 .1 

Mark Twain St. 11 .4 11 .4 9.2 12 .1 10.6 10.9 

Pk. 

Ste. Genevieve 13.7 13 .6 12.4 15.0 13 .2 13.7 

MSU 12.7 11 .7 11 .0 13.0 11 .7 11 .9 

St. Joseph 13.0 11 .9 11 .4 14.5 12.2 12.7 

Columbia 12.4 12 .5 10.2 12.9 11 .7 11 .8 

* - middle scale site - not for comparison to annual average 
APPENDIX I 

6.9 Appendix I Missouri Air Quality Monitors Locations 

Oxides of Nitrogen, Particulate Matter, Ozone and Oxides of 

Sulfur as of 9/30/05 

Agency 

Site Identification 

Site Name Pollutant 

Environmental Services 

29-047-0003 

Watkins Mill 030) 

29-047-0005 

Liberty N02 

PM2.5 

PM2.5 (2) 

030) 

29-183-1002 

West Alton NOZ 

29-021-0005 

St. Joseph 

Pump Station 

PM2.5 

030) 

PMIo 

PM2.5 

29-097-0003 

Carthage Stone PMIo 

PMIo (2) 

29-047-0026 

North Kansas City PMIO (discontinued 1 July) 

29-099-0012 

Arnold 030) 

PM2.5 

PM2.5 (2) 
29-137-0001 

Mark Twain State Park 030) 

PMIo 

PM2.5 

SOZ 

29-183-1004 

Orchard Farm 030) 

29-157-0001 

Farrar 03(l) 

29-113-0003 

Foley 030) 

29-186-0005 

Bonne Terre 

29-039-0001 

El Dorado Springs 

N02 

030) 

PM2.5 (2) 

03 

PM2.5 

PM2.5 (2) 

29-186-0006 

Ste. Genevieve PM2.5 

29-019-0001 

Columbia PM2.5 

20-047-0006 

Rocky Creek 030) 

20-049-0001 

Trimble 030) 

29-095-0035 

Van Brunt PMIo 

29-095-0034 

Troost N02 

PMIo 

PM2.5 

PM2.5 (2) 

S02 

-61- 
29-037-0003 

Richards Gebaur 

South 

030) 

PM2.5 

29-165-0023 

KCI 030) 

SOZ 

29-095-0010 

UMKC PM2.5 

29-163-0002 

Clarksville S02 

ST LOUIS COUNTY 

29-189-0004 

Sunset Hills N02 

03(l) 

PM2.5 

S02 

29-189-2003 

Clayton Animal 

Shelter 

PMIo 

PM2.5 

29-189-0006 

Queeny NOz 

030) 

S02 

29-189-3001 

Ladue N02 

PM2.5 (2) 

S02 

29-189-0014 

Maryland Heights NOZ 

030) 

S02 

29-189-0005 

Pacific 030) 
ST LOUIS CITY 

29-510-0007 

South Broadway PM2.5 

SOZ 

29-510-0072 

Clark N02 (discontinued 1 May) 

29-510-0088 

Hall Street PM1o (2) 

29-510-0085 

Blair Street 030) 

PMIo 

PM2.5 (2) 

PM2.5 

29-510-0086 

Margaretta N02 

03 (1) 

PMIo 

PM2.5 

S02 

29-510-0087 

Mound Street PMIo 

PM2.5 

29-510-0092 

North Market PMIo (2) 

SPRINGFIELD 

29-077-0026 

South Charleston S02 

29-077-0032 

Missouri State PMIo 

University PM2.5 

S02 

29-077-0036 

Hillcrest High 

School 

N02 

03(l) 

29-077-0037 

James River-South S02 

(1) Operates only during ozone season (4-1/10-31) 

-63- 
(2) Some PM2,5 and PMIO readings are measured and recorded by Tapered 

Element Oscillating Microbalance Monitors (TEOM). 
Missouri State Map Air Monitor Locations 

Statewide Spatial Distribution of the PR2.5 Mass 

2003-2005 Annual Design Values ( Annual mean Std= 15 ug/m3) 

11a

..._ .-

Site# Site N am e 

--.......... 

Ol WestAltan 

02 Margaretta 

03 B1airStreet 

04 SouthBroadway 

05 Clayton 

06 SunsetHills 

07 Arnold 

Kansas City .4i-ea 

Site# Site Name 

08 Liberty 

09 Troost 

10 UMKC 

11 RG-S outh 

Qutstate Area 

Site# Site Name 

12 St . Joseph 

13 Mark Twain State Park 

14 Columbua 

15 El Dorado Springs 

16 LOU 

17 St Gernevieve 

111111111112 

.,.=J 

Ys1 .W.n.l,umm .nr.,m.tt.1 .~.1 

AsaYelWanC .adlAapm 

fksgesd~Rplr~ "dYpRmcaMalas, OiC1~:005 1 

0 12.5 25 5D Miles 

I _1 1 
State-Aide Spatial Distribution of the PM2.S Mass 

2003-2005 24-hour Design Values ( 24-hr Std = 65 uglm3) 

end ~,m, I !1 3 

PM2 .5 MnniDor ,. . ^° . Design Value 

12004 Designation, MO ~~aucxamen 

St . Louis Area 

Site# Site Name 

............ . ............ .. . .. ... 

01 West Alton 

02 Margaretta 

03 Blair Street 

04 South Broadway 

05 Clayton 

06 Sunset Hills 

07 Arnold 

Kansas City Area 

Site# ..- Site ...-- . _._N ...me .......... 

08 Liberty 

09 Troost 

10 UMKC 

11 RG-South 

(3utstate Area 

Site# Site N ame 

12 St . Joseph 

13 Mark Twain State Park 

14 Columbia 

15 El Dorado Springs 

16 MSU 

17 St Genevieve 

r.a~. .e. .mia.~ 

saRg4aaRyA~a BWni, o4Rlflaoi) 
Spatial Distribution of the Manitor+ed 8-hour Ozone Concentration 

..` - 2003-2005 8-hour Design Values ( 8-hr Std = 85 ppb) 

17 Trimble 

18 WatkinsMill 

19 RockyCreek 

20 Liberty 

21 RG-Sotrth 

~Leie 

L 

TUW 

Q," 

I t, L oui s Ay ea 

Smilies#SoSwitie Nam 

01 Foley 

02 OrchardFarm 

03 WesEAlton 

04 Margaretta 

05 B1airStreet 

06 MarylandHts 

07 Pacific 

08 SunsetHills 

09 Araold 

10 Boruue Terre 

IDinois 

Site# Site Name 

11 Jerseyville 

12 Aiton 

13 WoodRiver 

14 Maryville 

13 EastSt Louis 

16 Hoiuton 

0 12 `. -. 1 qlka 
APPENDIX J 

6.10 Appendix J Clean Air Interstate Rules and 

Clean Air Mercury Rule MACC Adoption Certification 
.Order of RVILMakin ~~~,~,~~ n 

Pursuant to 643.055 RSMo, the Missouri Air Conservation Commission has 

determined that this action is needed to have a U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency approved State Implementation Plan. 

lean Air Interstate Rule Annual NOx Trading Program is 

hereby ADOPTED by the Missouri Air Conservation Comrrission this 1 st day of 

February, 2007. 

Chairman 

airman 

Member 

Member 

Member 

, Member 
lean Air Interstate Rule Seasonal NOx Trading 

i Air Conservation Commission this 1 st 

, Member 
Or gi Rule " 

Pursuart to 643.055 RSMo, the Missouri Air Conservation Commission has 

determined that this action is needed to have a US. Environmental Protection 

Agency approved State Implementation Plan. 

terstate Rule SC2 Trading Program is her( 

ion this 1 st day of 

Member 
Pursuant to 643,t}55 RSMo~ the Missouri Air Conservation Commission has determined that this action is needed to have a U.S. Environmental Fro' Agency roved State Implementation Plan. 

10 CSR 10-6. Control of Mercury Emissions From Electric Generating Units is hereby ADOPP1"ED by the Missouri Air Conservation Commission this 1st day 

e, Frabrruary, 2ow'. 

irrnan 

Vice-Chairman 

ber 

., Member 

Member