p.1 

OAR Box 1672 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

ll-C-13 

Docket Number: 

A-98-13 

Printed 9/30/2008 11:01:00 AM Sheet 42 of 132 
P.2 

A 981 3 

Date sent. Fri, 27 Feb 1998 13:20:32-0500 

From: STEVE SHEDD <SHEDD.STEVE@epamail.epa.gov> 

Subject: Re: ICR Mailing List -Reply 

Copies to: jacobsenje@alyeska-pipeline.com, rwhermanson@amoco.com, jbneville@aol, 

com@epamail.epa.gov, ritterk@api.org, hmielt@basf.com, pho@bryancavellp.com, 

donna_h@deq.state.la.us, bill_r_beck@email.mobil.com, jestock@emcowheaton.com, 

joefed@emcowheaton.com, SHEDD.STEVE@epamail.epa.gov, 

norman.L.morrow@exxon.sprint.com, joelfazzio@imtt.com, ztcdcm@is.arco.com, 

nttc@juno.com, ted_cromwell@mail.cmahq.com, delmer.billings@rspa.dot.gov, 

bhaneke@rtp.pes.com, bnorton@rtp.pes.com, glaflam@rtp.pes.com, 

JHELMS@rtp.pes.com, jlmcclure@shellus.com, degeja%csoc.lvs.dupont.com@smtp, 

wangdl@ucarb.com 

Bill Beck, I hope the below hits most of your concerns on the ICR 

ICR: As promised, we will E-mail all of you the ICR 

instructions for a quick review before we mail it out. We 

have changed the body (questions and tables) to reflect the minor 

comments we received in the meetings and one comment letter. We are 

still trying to limit the questions to refineries and chemical plants 

by looking at the HON and refinery MACT rules and taking to industry 

contacts. I am still thinking about limiting wastewater questions by 

amount generated but need data on typical volumes (see my last note). 

The current schedule is to get the mailing list out to you soon, if 

not already done. (I have been out of the office for a while and have 

not looked at all my E-mail) We hope to get the instructions out soon 

but we need to address the above issues before we send it out (maybe 

next week). 

Mailing List: I am assuming that the review by industry will be 

quick as promised. I also assume that since this 

MACT team includes representatives of most of the distribution 

associations, that all addresses and contacts that are part of those 

associations will be correct and appropriate after we receive comments 

from those associations or the actual member company. 

I hope this helps your understanding. Steve 

Stephen Shedd 

U.S. EPA 

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 

voice: (919) 541-5397 

fax: (919) 541-0246 

E-mail: Shedd.Steve@EPAMAIL.EPA.GOV 

> » <bil_r_beck@email.mobil.com> 02/27/98 10:07am > » 

Bernd: I will be the contact for all of Mobil Corporation (Mobil Oil, 

Mobil Chemical and or Exploration & Production) 

Please include my room number: 6W109 in the mailing address. 

Note that I am only speaking for Mobil - for other oil companies who 

may be members of API, I'd suggest that you contact Karin Ritter 

(ritterk@api.org) phone: 202-682-8472. She has attended your meetings 

and should be on your mailing list. 

I continue to be concerned that PES and the Agency are acting too 

hastily in sending out this survey. Without considering the comments 

Greg LaFlam - 1 - Thu, 20 Aug 1998 09:22:26 
P.3 

provided by industry representatives and allowing us an opportunity to 

review and improve the survey format the Agency risks sending out a 

confusing survey that is likely to result in unintelligible and 

incorrect responses that PES will spend a great deal of time 

resolving. Specifically, I (and I'm sure other industry 

representatives) am awaiting the opportunity to review the latest 

draft of "instructions" for the survey. I get the distinct impression 

that the survey will be sent out on March 6 regardless of the 

condition of the format in order to meet an arbitrally established 

timetable. 

Regards, Bill Beck, Mobil Corporation, 703-849-6245 

Greg LaFlam - 2 - Thu, 20 Aug 1998 09:22:27 

J L