alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      21**





**Subsidiaries
      of CNB Financial Corp.**























Subsidiaries
      of CNB Financial Corp.





·  Commonwealth
      National Bank is a national bank located in Massachusetts.





·  CNB
      Security Corporation, a Massachusetts corporation, is a wholly owned subsidiary
      of Commonwealth National Bank and was formed (effective April 29, 2005) to
      hold
      and manage assets acquired by Commonwealth National Bank, including investment
      assets and property acquired by the bank through foreclosure or otherwise in
      good faith to compromise a doubtful claim, or in the ordinary course of
      collecting a debt previously contracted as permitted under 12 CFR
      5.34(e)(5)(v)(A).





·  Commonwealth
      National Bank Statutory Trust I is a wholly owned subsidiary of CNB Financial
      Corp. organized as a Connecticut statutory business trust effective December
      14,
      2005 in connection with the issuance of trust preferred securities by CNB
      Financial Corp. on December 16, 2005.
No. 12-341.

#### Guy et al. *v.*Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government et al.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
1

ALD

- 237 NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________ No. 16

- 1452

___________ IN RE: AKEEM R. GUMBS,

Petitioner

____________________________________ On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the District Co urt of the Virgin Islands (Related to D.V.I. Crim. No. 3

- 11

- cr - 00021)

____________________________________ Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.

April 28, 2016 Before: AMBRO, SHWARTZ, and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed : May 5, 2016 )

_________ OPINION *

_________ PER CURIAM Akeem R. Gumbs petitions for a writ of mandamus, seeking to have this Court direct the District Court of the Virgin Islands to set a date for an evidentiary hearing in connection with his motion filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. We will deny the petition.

* This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not c onstitute binding precedent.2

A writ of mandamus is a drastic remedy that is invoked only in extraordinary situations. See Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Court , 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976). To warrant relief, a petitioner must show: (1) both a clear and indisputable rig ht to the writ, and (2) that he has no other adequate means to obtain the relief desired. See Haines v. Liggett Group
Inc. , 975 F.2d 81, 89 (3d Cir. 1992) (citing Kerr , 426 U.S. at 403).
A district court retains discretion over the manner in which it c ontrols its docket,

see In re Fine Paper Antitrust Litig. , 685 F.2d 810, 817 (3d Cir. 1982), but an appellate court may issue a writ of mandamus when an “undue delay is tantamount to a failure to exercise jurisdiction[.]” Madden v. Myers , 102 F.3d 74, 79 (3d Cir. 1996), superseded in part on other grounds by 3d Cir. L.A.R. 24.1(c). Here, there is no basis for granting the petition for a writ of mandamus on the basis of undue delay. While Gumbs claims that his § 2255 motion was pending for nearly a year b efore the Government filed its
response, 1 nothing we would do at this point could alter that situation. The docket reflects that Gumbs filed a reply to the Government’s response on January 4, 2016. The matter has thus been ripe for decision or scheduling of an evidentiary hearing for about four months. 2 We do not hesitate to conclude that this period of time does not rise to the level of undue delay. W e see no reason to believe that the District Court will not

1 We note that Gumbs filed a number of amended motions during that time.

2 In any event, we would not ordinarily direct a district court, via mandamus, to hold an evidentiary hearing as district courts have the discretion to d etermine in the first instance whether such a hearing is necessary. See Rule 8(a), Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings; see also Schriro v. Landrigan , 550 U.S. 465, 473 (2007).3

adjudicate the motion in due course. Thus, we conclude that there is no basis here for an extraordinary remedy. Because our intervention is not warranted, we will deny the petition for a writ of mandamus.
|EXHIBIT 23.1
|------------

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-128584 of Admiralty Holding Company on Form SB-2 of our report dated April 10, 2006, related to the audit of the consolidated financial
statements of Admiralty Holding Company. as of December 31, 2005 and 2004,and for the years then ended, and the inception period from April 15, 1988 to December 31, 2005appearing in
this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Admiralty Holding Company.



|/s/ Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P.
|-------------------------------------



|Atlanta, GeorgiaApril 10, 2006
|------------------------------

---
# C_2018413EN.01000702.xml

| 14.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 413/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 413/7

---

EUROPEAN INSTITUTE FOR GENDER EQUALITY

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2017

(2018/C 413/25)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

http://eige.europa.eu/about-eige/documents-registry?ct3[]=651

---
#### State v. Jarmon

109,098

10/09/2015

Denied

Unpublished
#### State v. Pete

106,954

08/20/13

Denied.

Unpublished
# C_2019364EN.01003001.xml

| 29.10.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 364/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 364/30

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9588 — Shell Energy Retail/Hudson Energy Supply)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 364/10)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Shell Energy Retail Limited (‘SERL’, of Great Britain), belonging to the Shell Group, whose ultimate parent is Royal Dutch Shell plc. |
| --- | --- |

—

Shell Energy Retail Limited (‘SERL’, of Great Britain), belonging to the Shell Group, whose ultimate parent is Royal Dutch Shell plc.

| — | Hudson Energy Supply UK Limited (‘Hudson Energy Supply’ or the ‘Target’, of Great Britain), controlled by Hudson Energy Holdings UK Limited, belonging to the Just Energy Group Inc. |
| --- | --- |

—

Hudson Energy Supply UK Limited (‘Hudson Energy Supply’ or the ‘Target’, of Great Britain), controlled by Hudson Energy Holdings UK Limited, belonging to the Just Energy Group Inc.

SERL acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of Hudson Energy Supply.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | for SERL: the retail supply of gas and electricity to household and business customers in the UK, |
| --- | --- |

—

for SERL: the retail supply of gas and electricity to household and business customers in the UK,

| — | for Hudson Energy Supply: the retail supply of gas and electricity to household and business customers in the UK. |
| --- | --- |

—

for Hudson Energy Supply: the retail supply of gas and electricity to household and business customers in the UK.

3.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9588 — Shell Energy Retail/Hudson Energy Supply

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---
#### State v. Garcia-Barron

109,005

06/29/2015

Denied

50 Kan. App. 2d 500
|                                                                                         
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                           
|View History:                                                                            
|                                                                                         
|Percent of Commercial Natural Gas Deliveries in Maine Represented by the Price  (Percent)
|                                                                                         
|                                                                                         
|Percent of Commercial Natural Gas Deliveries in Maine Represented by the Price  (Percent)
|                                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 100.0  | 100.0  | 61.6   | 70.2   | 64.6   | 59.9   | 48.7   | 46.2   | 45.0   | 51.0  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 45.0   | 45.8   | 42.1   | 42.6   | 49.1   | 53.2   | 57.8   | 59.3   | 62.3   | 63.3  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 62.8   | 63.2   | 64.3   | NA     |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
i i i i i i



### MEM ORA ND UM OP INION No
. 04 -1 0- 00 07 9- CR I vana AL VA RE Z , Appellant
v . T h e STA TE of

Te xas, Appellee Fr om the County

Court at L aw No.1, Be x ar County , Texas Trial Court No. 230625 Honora ble Al Alonso, J udg e Presiding PER C URI AM Sitt ing: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Kar en Ang elini, J ustice Sandee B ry an Mar ion, J ustice Deliver ed and F iled: Febr uary 10, 2010 DI SMI SSED FOR L ACK OF J URI SDI CTI ON I vana A lvare z filed a notice of a ppeal se eking to appea l from a se ntence imposed on September 23, 2008. The only order signe d by the trial court on September 23, 2008, was a n order altering and ame nding A lvare z’s conditions of probation. This court has no jurisdi ction to hear an04
- 10
- 00 07 9- CR

- 2- appea l from an or der a ltering or modify ing pr obation conditions . S e e Ba sa ldu a v . S

tat e , 558 S.W .2d 2, 5 (Tex. Crim. App. 1977). Acc ording ly , this appeal is dismissed for lac k of jurisdiction. PER C URI AM DO NOT PUBL I SH
#### *In re*Tax Appeal of Cessna Employees Credit Union

105,139

05/20/13

Denied.

47 Kan. App. 2d 275
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 545 

To authorize the production of records by the Permanent Subcommittee 

on Investigations of the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 27 (legislative day, MAY 26), 2010 

Mr. REID (for himself and Mr. MCCONNELL) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

To authorize the production of records by the Permanent 

Subcommittee on Investigations of the Committee on 

Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. 

Whereas, the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations of 

the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental 

Affairs conducted an investigation into Wall Street and 

the financial crisis of 2008, examining the role of mortgage lenders, bank regulators, credit rating agencies, and 

investment banks in causing the crisis; 

Whereas, the Subcommittee has received requests from federal and state government entities for access to records 

of the Subcommittee’s investigation; 

Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States 

and Rule XI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, no eviVerDate Mar 15 2010 05:21 May 29, 2010 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\SR545.ATS SR545

jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 545 ATS 

dence under the control or in the possession of the Senate can, by administrative or judicial process, be taken 

from such control or possession but by permission of the 

Senate; 

Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or 

in the possession of the Senate is needed for the promotion of justice, the Senate will take such action as will 

promote the ends of justice consistent with the privileges 

of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Chairman and Ranking Minority 

2 Member of the Permanent Subcommittee on Investiga3 tions of the Committee on Homeland Security and Govern4 mental Affairs, acting jointly, are authorized to provide 

5 to law enforcement officials, regulatory agencies, and 

6 other entities or individuals duly authorized by federal, 

7 state, or foreign governments, records of the Subcommit8 tee’s investigation into Wall Street and the financial crisis 

9 of 2008, examining the role of mortgage lenders, bank reg10 ulators, credit rating agencies, and investment banks in 

11 causing the crisis. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
#### State v. Burch

111,351

09/14/2015

Denied.

Unpublished
<PAGE>

Tel: 972-3-7538300    OREN HOROWlTZ C.P.A AND CONSULTANTS   [LOGO] BAKER TILLY
Fax: 972-3-7538301    l2 HACHILAZON ST., RAMAT GAN 52522           OREN HOROWITZ





The Board of Directors
Delta Galil Industries Ltd.


Re: Accountants' Consent
    --------------------


We consent to the use in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Delta Galil
Industries Ltd. filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission,
of our report dated May 5, 2003 on the consolidated balance sheets of Delta
Galil Industries Ltd. and its subsidiaries as at December 31, 2002 and the
consolidated statements of income, retained earnings and changes in financial
position for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 and to the
incorporation by reference of such report into (i) the Registration Statement on
Form F-3 (Registration No. 333-12984) and (ii) three Registration Statements on
Form S-8 of Delta Galil Industries Ltd. (Registration Nos. 333-12608, 333-13716
and 333-102247).


                                                  /s/ Oren Horowitz & Co.
                                                      OREN - HOROWITZ & CO.

                                             Certified Public Accountants (Isr.)

3042-1202
# C_2019356EN.01000901.xml

| 21.10.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 356/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.10.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 356/9

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9449 — VAG/Varta (Consumer Battery, Chargers and Portable Power and Lighting Business))

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 356/08)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Varta Aktiengesellschaft (‘VAG’, Germany), |
| --- | --- |

—

Varta Aktiengesellschaft (‘VAG’, Germany),

| — | Varta Consumer Battery, Chargers and Portable Power and Lighting Business (‘Varta Business’), part of Energizer Holdings, Inc. (‘Energizer’, USA). |
| --- | --- |

—

Varta Consumer Battery, Chargers and Portable Power and Lighting Business (‘Varta Business’), part of Energizer Holdings, Inc. (‘Energizer’, USA).

VAG acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of Varta Business.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | for VAG: manufacture and wholesale supply of batteries for automotive, industrial and consumer markets in the EU and worldwide, |
| --- | --- |

—

for VAG: manufacture and wholesale supply of batteries for automotive, industrial and consumer markets in the EU and worldwide,

| — | for Varta Business: part of Energizer, which includes Spectrum’s former Varta consumer battery, chargers and portable power and lighting business in the European, Middle Eastern and African regions. |
| --- | --- |

—

for Varta Business: part of Energizer, which includes Spectrum’s former Varta consumer battery, chargers and portable power and lighting business in the European, Middle Eastern and African regions.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9449 — VAG/Varta (Consumer Battery, Chargers and Portable Power and Lighting Business)

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

---
#### State v. Beltran

111,677

09/14/2015

Denied.

Unpublished
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 72 (Tuesday, April 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 18354]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-9591]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Administration on Aging


Public Information Collection Requirement Submitted to the Office 
of Management and Budget for Clearance

AGENCY: Administration on Aging.

    The Administration on Aging, Department of Health and Human 
Services, is submitting the following proposal for the collection of 
information in compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (Public Law 
96-511); Title VI Program Performance Reports.
    Type of Request: ``Reinstatement, without change.''
    Use: To continue an existing information collection, Title VI 
Program Performance Report, from Title VI grantees to use in reporting 
information on programs funded by Title VI as required under Section 
202(a)(19), Section 614(a)(2), and Section 614(a)(3) of the Older 
Americans Act, as amended.
    Frequency: Semiannually.
    Respondent: Tribal organizations and nonprofit organizations 
representing Native Hawaiians.
    Estimated number of responses: 222.
    Estimated Burden Hours: 648.
    Additional Information or Comments: The reporting system would 
become effective in fiscal year 1997. The reporting form would include 
the following elements:
    <bullet> Total number services provided;
    <bullet> Unduplicated number of persons receiving services;
    <bullet> Staffing, including volunteers;
    <bullet> Number of meal sites operated during budget period; and
    <bullet> Total number of resources used to support the Title VI 
programs.
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent to the following address within 30 days of 
the publication of this notice: Administration on Aging, Wilbur J. 
Cohen Federal Building, 330 independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 
20201, Attn: Reginald A. Newsome.
William F. Benson,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Aging.
[FR Doc. 97-9591 Filed 4-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-04-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 72 (Tuesday, April 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18353-18354]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-9605]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of Banks 
or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

[[Page 18354]]

    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. Once the notices have been accepted for 
processing, they will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later 
than April 30, 1997.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (John E. Yorke, Senior Vice 
President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. Thomas E. Criswell, as co-trustee, Ada, Oklahoma; to acquire an 
additional 67.9 percent, for a total of 74.3 percent; Bill J. Horne, 
Sr., as co-trustee, Ada, Oklahoma, to acquire an additional 63.2 
percent, for a total of 74.3 percent; C.B. Howard, as co-trustee, Ada, 
Oklahoma, to acquire an additional 69.8 percent, for a total of 74.3 
percent; Richard J. Thompson, as co-trustee, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 
to acquire an additional 59.3 percent, for a total of 74.3 percent; and 
James N. Wall, as co-trustee, Shawnee, Oklahoma, to acquire an 
additional 67.9 percent, for a total of 74.3 percent, of the voting 
shares of First Ada Bancshares, Inc., Ada, Oklahoma, and thereby 
indirectly acquire First National Bank and Trust Company, Ada, 
Oklahoma.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 9, 1997.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-9605 Filed 4-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
#### State v. Mullen

110,468

10/09/2015

Granted; cross-petition denied

51 Kan. App. 2d 514