alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 66 (Monday, April 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 16627]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-8833]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. 50-213]


Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company; (Haddam Neck Plant); 
Correction to Notice of Withdrawal of Application for Amendment

    The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission issued a Notice of 
Withdrawal of Application for Amendment for Facility Operating License 
No. DPR-61 for the Haddam Neck Plant on March 13, 1997. In the Federal 
Register issue of Monday, March 24, 1997, make the following 
correction:
    On page 13899, first column, last paragraph, the date as issued 
``this 13th day of March 1997,'' should have read ``this 17th day of 
March 1997.''

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 31st day of March.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
James W. Andersen,
Project Manager, Special Projects Office--Licensing, Office of Nuclear 
Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 97-8833 Filed 4-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
EXHIBIT 31.2
                              CERTIFICATION

I, David T. Nguyen, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Santa Fe Financial
Corporation;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

    a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

    b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

    c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing equivalent functions):

    a) all significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

    b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: September 29, 2003                      /s/ David T. Nguyen
                                              ---------------------------
                                              David T. Nguyen, Treasurer
                                              and Controller (serving as
                                              Chief Financial Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 60 (Friday, March 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14944-14945]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-7879]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application

    Pursuant to Section 1301.43(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on November 22, 1996, Johnson & 
Johnson Pharmaceutical Partners, HC-02 State Road 933, KMO.1 Mamey 
Ward, HC-02 Box 19250, Gurabo, Puerto Rico 00778-

[[Page 14945]]

 9629, made application by renewal, which was received for processing 
February 14, 1997, to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) for 
registration as a bulk manufacturer of sufentanil (9740), a basic class 
of controlled substance in Schedule II.
    The firm plans to manufacture the listed controlled substance for 
bulk distribution to its customers.
    Any other such applicant and any person who is presently registered 
with DEA to manufacture such substance may file comments or objections 
to the issuance of the above application.
    Any such comments or objections may be addressed, in quintuplicate, 
to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, 
Drug Enforcement Administration, United States Department of Justice, 
Washington, D.C. 20537, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative 
(CCR), and must be filed no later than May 27, 1997.

    Dated: February 28, 1997.
Gene R. Haislip,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 97-7879 Filed 3-27-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
No. 12-5889.

#### Nitschke *v.*Premo, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# C_2019123EN.01000302.xml

| 2.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 123/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 123/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8989 — Sony/EMI Music Publishing)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 123/06)

On 26 October 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8989. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8989. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code), the Trustee of Marine Petroleum Trust (the Trust) does hereby certify, to its knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2016 (the Form 10-Q) of the Trust fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.



|                                                                                                                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Ron E. Hooper                                                                                                                    
|Ron E. Hooper                                                                                                                        
|Senior Vice President on behalf of Southwest Bank, not in its individual capacity but solely as the Trustee of Marine Petroleum Trust

Dated: November 14, 2016

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Trust and will be retained by the Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Trust, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
|                                                                                 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                   
|View History:                                                                    
|                                                                                 
|No chart available.                                                              
|No chart available.                                                              
|                                                                                 
|                                                                                 
|the District of Columbia Natural Gas Industrial Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     | --     | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Ruby Mining Co. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, G.
Howard Collingwood, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Murray D.
Bradley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:

   1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

By: /s/ G. Howard Collingwood
   -----------------------------
G. Howard Collingwood Chief
Executive Officer
June 24, 2005



/s/ Murray D. Bradley
--------------------------------
Murray D. Bradley
Chief Financial Officer
June 24, 2005






                                       76


<PAGE>
No. 12-5891.

#### Barragan *v.*California.

Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, SIXTH DISTRICT, AT TEXARKANA

No. 06-15-00098-CV

In the Interest of J.K.V., a Child

(No. 2014-873-DR IN 307TH DISTRICT COURT OF GREGG COUNTY)

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID BY

MOTION FEE

MOTION FEE

MOTION FEE

CLERK'S RECORD

REPORTER'S RECORD

FILING

$15.00

$10.00

$10.00

$208.00

$410.00

$205.00

EXEMPT

EXEMPT

INDIGENT

INDIGENT

INDIGENT

INDIGENT

TDFPS

TDFPS

EBB MOBLEY, APPT ATTY

EBB MOBLEY, APPT ATTY

Balance of costs owing to the Sixth Court of Appeals, Texarkana, Texas: 0.00

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, DEBRA AUTREY, CLERK OF THE SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE 

STATE OF TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct 

copy of the cost bill of THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH DISTRICT OF 

TEXAS, showing the charges and payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, 

as the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, 

witness my hand and the Seal of 

the COURT OF APPEALS for 

the Sixth District of Texas, this 

July 6, 2016.

DEBRA AUTREY, CLERK

By ___________________________

Deputy
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-20182 Summary Calendar

CARL DAVIS; KIRK BENNETT; JOHN W. FULLER; JAMES REED; RAMON L. SOLANAS; RAYNALDO LOPEZ; MICHAEL GRIGSBY; FLOYD COLLINS; DEXTER HOOVER; RAY ROBINSON; MICHAEL HERNANDEZ; HOMERO ROSAS; JAMES HALL; JAMES HUNTER; JAMES MANERS; ALAN MULLINS; MICHAEL CAIN; ROBERT A. WHITE; BRET COOK; SAMY LUALY, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus WAYNE SCOTT, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; JERRY GROOM; EARL FOX, MAJOR; DOUGLAS DRETKE, ASST. WARDEN; JERRY BARATT; D. DOWNS, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. CA-H-95-69

- - - - - - - - - - September 9, 1996 Before KING, WIENER and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Texas state prisoners Michael Cain, # 647455; Alan Mullins, # 548739; Raynaldo Lopez, # 643937; Ray Robinson, # 620379; RamonNo. 96-20182 - 2 -

** Larry Davis, # 628403, also filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis ; however, he cannot appeal because he did not sign the notice of appeal. See Carter v. Stalder , 60 F.3d 238, 239 (5th Cir. 1995).

*** We do not address the denial of the motion for a temporary restraining order because it is not an appealable order. See In re Lieb , 915 F.2d 180, 183 (5th Cir. 1990). Although the appellants’ notice of appeal mentions an appeal from the denial of a motion for class certification, the issue is deemed abandoned because no arguments have been briefed on the issue. See Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993). Solanas, # 640719; and Carl Davis, # 634171 ** seek to proceed in forma pauperis in their appeal from the district court’s orders denying their motions for appointment of counsel and a preliminary injunction. *** The appellants have identified no error in the district court’s denial of their motions. Davis et al. v. Scott et al. , No. CA-H-95-69 (S.D. Tex. Jan. 31, 1996). The appeal fails to present a nonfrivolous issue, and the motion to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. See Jackson v. Dallas Police Dep’t , 811 F.2d 260, 261 (5th Cir. 1986). The motion for appointment of counsel is also DENIED. The appeal is frivolous, and it is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
Exhibit 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

        I, Michael S. Dunlap, certify that:

        1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of
periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of Nelnet Student
Loan Trust 2002-2;

        2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day covered by this annual report;

        3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and
servicing agreement, or similar agreements, for inclusion in these reports is
included in these reports;

        4. Based upon my knowledge and upon the annual compliance statement
included in the report and required to be delivered to the trustee in accordance
with the terms of the pooling and servicing, or similar agreements, and except
as disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under
the servicing agreement; and

        5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report
provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in
compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or
similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar
agreement, that is included in these reports.



Date:  March 31, 2006                /s/ Michael S. Dunlap
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                         Michael S. Dunlap
                                         President
                                         (Principal Executive Officer)
                                         Nelnet Student Loan Funding Management
                                         Corporation, Manager and Special Member
                                         of the Registrant

                                       5
|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                
|View History:                                                 
|                                                              
|Maine Natural Gas Industrial Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                              
|                                                              
|Maine Natural Gas Industrial Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 2,525  | 2,297  | 2,550 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 12,984 | 10,929 | 23,672 | 3,315  | 16,233 | 6,500  | 17,514 | 21,640 | 25,628 | 25,923
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 28,365 | 27,734 | 30,248 | 32,308 | 24,121 | 20,972 | 18,983 | 17,698 | 19,231 | 21,024
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 22,679 | 21,863 | 20,668 | 18,439 |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
### Filed 3/13/19 by Clerk of Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2019 ND 63 Jose Alfredo Medina Gonzales, Appellant

v. Workforce Safety and Insurance, Appellee
No. 20180365 Appeal from the District Court of Williams County, Northwest Ju dicial District, the Honorable Paul W. Jacobson, Judge

. AFFIRMED. Per Curiam. Stephen D. Little , Bismarck, N.D., for appellant. Douglas W. Gigler , Special Assistant Attorney General, Fargo, N.D., for appellee.Gonzales v. WSI No. 20180365
Per curiam. [¶1] Jose Gonzales appeals a district court judgment that affirm s an Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) order affirming a Workforce Safety and Insurance (“WSI”) administrative order denying Gonzales any compensation for his injury. The administrative order found Gonzales was not at work the day he claimed he was injured. Gonzales argues the ALJ wrongly found WSI’s evidence t o be more persuasive than his evidence. He also argues the ALJ should hav e permitted the testimony of his coworker instead of excluding it under the “ne wly discovered evidence” rule. We conclude the ALJ made no reversible error of law and the findings are supported by a preponderance of the evidence. We summarily affirm the district court judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(5). [¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Jerod E. Tufte Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jon J. Jensen

1