alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2019281EN.01002401.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 20.8.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 281/24 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9452 — Global Payments/TSYS)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 281/05)

1.

On 9 August 2019, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2019281EN.01002401-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Global Payments (United States) and, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | TSYS (United States). |

Global Payments enters into a full merger within the meaning of Article 3(1)(a) of the Merger Regulation with TSYS.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for Global Payments: provision of payment technology solutions and payment card transaction processing and,

—   for TSYS: provision of issuer solutions, merchant solutions, and consumer solutions in payment services.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9452 — Global Payments/TSYS

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2019281EN.01002401-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

---
#### State v. Howell

111,746

09/14/2015

Denied

Unpublished
|                                                                                       
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                         
|View History:                                                                          
|                                                                                       
|North Carolina Natural Gas Deliveries to Electric Power Consumers  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                       
|                                                                                       
|North Carolina Natural Gas Deliveries to Electric Power Consumers  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |         | 5,917   | 13,685  | 12,412 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 12,942  | 16,247  | 31,877  | 14,350  | 21,423  | 27,009  | 28,374  | 40,154  | 35,963  | 39,916 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 73,072  | 89,799  | 150,866 | 201,489 | 205,740 | 269,354 | 293,272 | 278,240 | 330,119 | 303,694
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 303,361 | 360,804 | 458,736 | 414,871 |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 86 

Designating April 18, 2009, as ‘‘National Auctioneers Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 26, 2009 

Mr. BROWNBACK (for himself and Mr. ROBERTS) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Designating April 18, 2009, as ‘‘National Auctioneers Day’’. 

Whereas auctions have played an important role in the sale 

and exchange of goods for nearly 2,000 years; 

Whereas auctions have been an integral part of the marketplace in the United States and around the world; 

Whereas auctioneers sold nearly $268,400,000,000 in goods 

and assets in 2008; 

Whereas the National Auctioneers Association has 5,000 

members and has its headquarters in Overland Park, 

Kansas; 

Whereas, in 2008, members of the National Auctioneers Association raised $16,000,000,000 for charity through 

benefit auctions; 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 86 IS 

Whereas auctions are growing in popularity and are used 

with increasing frequency in the marketplace; 

Whereas, through competitive bidding, auctions demonstrate 

how the free enterprise system establishes fair market 

value; 

Whereas trained professional auctioneers ensure that auctions 

are conducted in a manner that is fair to both buyers and 

sellers; 

Whereas, in the past, Federal, State, and local governments 

have designated days and weeks to celebrate auctioneers; 

and 

Whereas the designation by the Senate of April 18, 2009, as 

‘‘National Auctioneers Day’’ will heighten awareness of 

the contributions made by auctions and auctioneers to 

the economy, culture, and way of life of the people of the 

United States: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate designates April 18, 2009, 

2 as ‘‘National Auctioneers Day’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 72 (Tuesday, April 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 18353]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-9636]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

[Report No. 2187]


Petitions for Reconsideration and Clarification of Action in 
Rulemaking Proceeding

April 10, 1997.
    Petitions for reconsideration and clarification have been filed in 
the Commission's rulemaking proceedings listed in this Public Notice 
and published pursuant to 47 CFR Section 1.429(e). The full text of 
these document are available for viewing and copying in Room 239, 1919 
M Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. or may be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractor, ITS, Inc. (202) 857-3800. Oppositions to 
these petitions must be filed April 30, 1997. See Section 1.4(b)(1) of 
the Commission's rules (47 CFR 1.4(b)(1)). Replies to an opposition 
must be filed within 10 days after the time for filing oppositions has 
expired.
    Subject: Implementation of the Telecommunications Act of 1996: 
Telemessaging, Electronic Publishing, and Alarm Monitoring Services. 
(CC Docket No. 96-152)
    Number of Petitions Filed: 2.
    Subject: Implementation of Infrastructure Sharing Provisions in the 
Telecommunications Act of 1996. (CC Docket No. 96-237)
    Number of Petitions Filed: 5.

Federal Communications Commission.
William F. Caton,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-9636 Filed 4-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-M
---

Exhibit 32.1

Certification of CEO and CFO 
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the annual report of Corriente Resources Inc. (the "Registrant") on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Kenneth R. Shannon, as
Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, and Darryl F. Jones, as Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
of his knowledge, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
 material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
 Registrant.

/S/ KENNETH R. SHANNONBy: Kenneth R. Shannon 
Title: Chief Executive Officer
March 24, 2010



/S/ DARRYL F. JONESBy: Darryl F. Jones 
Title: Chief Financial Officer
March 24, 2010



This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Registrant for purposes of §18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

---
#### State v. Hunter

107,176

08/19/13

Denied. .

Unpublished
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-82,901-01

EX PARTE RYAN GARCIA, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 1285698R IN THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 2

FROM TARRANT COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant entered an open plea of guilty to

one count of aggravated robbery, and was apparently sentenced to two concurrent twenty-year

sentences for two paragraphs of the same indictment. 

Applicant contends that he was denied his right to appeal, because he heard nothing further

from trial counsel after the filing of a motion for new trial. We remanded this application to the trial

court for findings of fact and conclusions of law.
2

The trial court has determined that trial counsel was aware that Applicant wanted to appeal,

and that Applicant advised him that he was seeking new counsel for appeal. Applicant apparently

never secured appellate counsel, and although trial counsel filed a motion for new trial on

Applicant’s behalf, he failed to timely file a notice of appeal or withdraw from the representation so

that appellate counsel could be appointed. 

We find that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time appeal of the

judgment of conviction in Cause No. 1285698R from the Criminal District Court No. 2 of Tarrant

County. Applicant is ordered returned to that time at which he may give a written notice of appeal

so that he may then, with the aid of counsel, obtain a meaningful appeal. Within ten days of the

issuance of this opinion, the trial court shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant

is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall immediately appoint an

attorney to represent Applicant on direct appeal. All time limits shall be calculated as if the sentence

had been imposed on the date on which the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that, should

Applicant desire to prosecute an appeal, he must take affirmative steps to file a written notice of

appeal in the trial court within 30 days after the mandate of this Court issues.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division. 

Delivered: October 14, 2015

Do not publish
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of LSB Industries, Inc. (“LSB”) on Form 10
Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report").  I, Jack E. Golsen,
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of LSB, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      LSB.








/s/ Jack E. Golsen


Jack E.
Golsen


Chairman
of the Board and


Chief
Executive Officer


(Principal
Executive officer)








August 6,
2010








This
certification is furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission solely for
purpose of 18 U.S.C. §1350 subject to the knowledge standard contained therein,
and not for any other purpose.
No. 12-325.

No. 12-6340.

#### Smith *v.*United States; and Baker *v.*United States.

C. A. 7th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied. Reported below: 674 F. 3d 722.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0604

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

PRESTON CSOO ROSSBACH,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including December 30, 2022, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 23 2022

11/23/2022

Case Number: DA 20-0604
Exhibit 32.2

Statement of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code as adopted

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned, Arthur W. Hicks, Jr. the President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Cybex International, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that:

The Companys Form 10-Q Quarterly Report for the period ended June 26, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 3, 2010



/s/ Arthur W. Hicks, Jr.Arthur W. Hicks, Jr.President, Chief Operating Officer and
Chief Financial Officer


A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO CYBEX INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY CYBEX
INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND WILL BE FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
# Table 7.7
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             257
<SECURITIES>                                       401
<RECEIVABLES>                                      497
<ALLOWANCES>                                        18
<INVENTORY>                                        862
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,038
<PP&E>                                           4,107
<DEPRECIATION>                                     940
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,772
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,051
<BONDS>                                            298
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                            53
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,608
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,772
<SALES>                                          3,299
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,299
<CGS>                                            2,828
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,295
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      4
<INCOME-TAX>                                         2
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  2
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    (4)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (2)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.03)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.1**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We have issued our reports dated February 19, 2008, accompanying the consolidated financialstatements and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting included in the Annual Report of American Railcar Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.  We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-136680) and Form S-4 (No. 333-141477)of American Railcar Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries of our reports dated February 19, 2008relating to the financial statements and effective operation of internal control over financialreporting which appears in the Form 10-K.        /s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP    Chicago, Illinois   February 19, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 69 (Thursday, April 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 17628]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-9297]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special 
Emphasis Panel (SEP) meeting:

    Name of SEP: Specialized Clinical Fellowships (Teleconference).
    Date: May 5, 1997.
    Time: 1:00 p.m.--adjournment.
    Place: 6100 Executive Boulevard, 6100 Building Room 5E03, 
Rockville, Maryland 20852.
    Contact Person: Hameed Khan, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Administrator, NICHD, 6100 Executive Boulevard, 6100 Building, Room 
5E01, Rockville, Maryland 20852, Telephone: 301-496-1485.
    Purpose/Agenda: To evaluate and review grant applications.

    The meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. The 
discussions of these applications could reveal confidential trade 
secrets or commercial property such as patentable material and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. [93.864, 
Population Research and No. 93.865, Research for Mothers and 
Children, National Institutes of Health].)

    Dated: April 7, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-9297 Filed 4-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Bar Docket No. 12619

#### In the Matter of Alan B. Gallas, *Respondent.*

(360 P.3d 1079)

Dated this 4th day of November, 2015.

In a letter signed October 21, 2015, addressed to the Clerk of the Appellate Courts, respondent Alan B. Gallas, an attorney admitted to practice law in Kansas, voluntarily surrendered his license to practice law in Kansas, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 217 (2014 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 403).

At the time the respondent surrendered his license, a complaint had been docketed by the office of the Disciplinaiy Administrator for investigation. The complaint alleged that the respondent violated Kansas Rules of Professional Conduct 1.15 (2014 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 567) (safekeeping property) and 8.4(b) and (c) (2014 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 680) (misconduct). The allegations involved conversion of client funds.

This court, having examined the files of the office of the Disciplinary Administrator, finds that the surrender of the respondent’s license should be accepted and that the respondent should be disbarred.

It Is Therefore Ordered that Alan B. Gallas be and he is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in Kansas, and his license and privilege to practice law are hereby revoked.

It Is Further Ordered that the Clerk of the Appellate Courts strike the name of Alan B. Gallas from the roll of attorneys licensed to practice law in Kansas.

It Is Further Ordered that this order shall be published in the Kansas Reports, that the costs herein shall be assessed to the respondent, and that the respondent forthwith shall comply with Supreme Court Rule 218 (2014 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 414).
# C_2019265EN.01000101.xml

| 7.8.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 265/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.8.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 265/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9425 — Genstar Capital Partners/TA Associates/Insightsoftware Business)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 265/01)

On 30 July 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9425. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9425. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---