alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE>
                             MAGMA COPPER COMPANY                  EXHIBIT 11
 
                       Computation of Per Share Earnings 
                   (In thousands, except per share amounts) 
<CAPTION>
                                    Three Months         Nine Months 
                                 ended September 30,  ended September 30,  
                                 -------------------  ------------------- 
                                   1995     1994       1995        1994
Primary                          -------   ------     ------      -------
-------
<S>                                <C>      <C>        <C>       <C>
Weighted average common             
  shares outstanding               47,807   49,313     48,858    49,095
Earnings used in per common 
  share computation:  
  Net income                      $51,880  $22,321   $158,069   $50,542 
   Preferred stock dividends       (2,906)  (2,906)    (8,718)   (8,718)
                                   ------   ------    -------    ------
  Net income available 
    for common stock              $48,974  $19,415   $149,351   $41,824 
                                   ======   ======    =======    ======
Earnings per share: 
  Net income                      $  1.08  $   .45   $   3.24   $  1.03
                                   ======   ======    =======    ======
  Preferred stock dividends          (.06)    (.06)      (.18)     (.18)
                                   ------   ------    -------    ------
Earnings per share of 
  common stock                    $  1.02  $   .39   $   3.06   $   .85 
                                   ======   ======    =======    ======
Assuming full dilution 
----------------------
Weighted average common 
  shares outstanding               51,880   22,321    158,069    50,542 
Earnings used in per common
  share computation: 
  Net income                      $54,423  $20,610   $106,189   $28,221 
Earnings per share:
  Net income                      $   .84  $   .35   $   2.50   $   .80 

Computation of weighted average 
  shares outstanding-fully diluted 
 ---------------------------------
Primary weighted average 
  shares outstanding               47,807   49,313     48,858    49,095 

Assuming full dilution: 
  Conversion of Series D Preferred           
    Stock (2 million shares at
    3.448 conversion rate)          6,896    6,896      6,896     6,896 
  Conversion of Series E Preferred
    Stock (2 million shares at
    3.5945 conversion rate)         7,189    7,189      7,189     7,189

  Incremental shares                   22       11        247       264 
                                   ------   ------    -------    ------
Fully diluted weighted 
  average shares outstanding       61,914   63,409     63,190    63,444 
                                   ======   ======    =======   =======
</TABLE>
#### *In re*Q.H.

108,608

10/07/13

Denied

Unpublished
Exhibit 10.33  [Lawson Software Logo]   July 26,
1999  Mr. Bruce
McTheeters 4920
Poppy Lane Edina,
MN 55435  Dear
Bruce:  Lawson
Software is pleased to offer employment to you as the Corporate Counsel with a
semi-monthly starting salary of $8,333.34. In addition, you will be eligible to
receive a $15,000.00 sign on bonus to be paid on the pay period following your
start date. This position is classified as a full-time, regular, exempt
position. Your employment start date is September 7, 1999.  You
will receive our excellent benefits package upon employment. A summary is
included for your review. Please note that you will be eligible to receive our
medical, dental, disability and survivor benefits after one month of
employment. You will also receive 50,000 stock options priced at the Fiscal
Year 1999 ESOP valuation amount. After your start date, you will receive a
Stock Option Agreement which details this further.  While
your salary and benefits are important aspects of your employment, we want you
to understand that this offer is not intended to be a contract of employment
and may not be construed as such.  You
are an employee-at-will and your employment is terminable at any time for any
reason by either you or Lawson Software. You will receive a one year severance
package, upon executing Lawsons standard separation agreement, if you are
terminated for any reason other than gross misconduct.  Lawsons
offer of employment is contingent upon your execution of the Employee Invention
and Nondisclosure Agreement. A sample of this agreement is enclosed for your
review. Any questions regarding the Trade Secret and Confidential Information
Policy of Lawson Associates should be presented to the Human Resources
Department prior to your employment. In accordance with the requirements set
forth in the Immigration and Control Act of 1986, you must also submit
documents certifying your right to work in the United States.  Bruce,
as per our telephone conversation today, I believe this includes all of the
items we discussed. Please feel free, however, to call me directly with any
questions.   Sincerely,/s/
  M.E.Mike MilbrandtMike
  MilbrandtExecutive
  Vice President of Corporate OperationsMM/rlc
RECEIVED 

OPPT C8IC 

20I3HAR27 AM 10: 06 

March 26, 2013 

Document Control Office (DCO) (7407M) 

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) 

Environmental Protection Agency 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 

Washington , DC 20460-0001 

LANXESS 

Energizing Chemistry 

Deborah Vercek 

Regulatory Affairs 

111 Park West Drive 

Pittsburgh, PA 15272-1112 

Phone 412-809-3709 

Fax: 412-809-1056 

Deborah.Vercek@lanxess.com 

www.US.LANXESS.com 

ATTN: 40 CFR 799.5089; 

Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2009-0112 

LANXESS Corporation Study Submission 

for CAS# 98-09-9 

Dear DCO Officer: 

Enclosed is the third and fourth of several tests LANXESS Corporation 

will be submitting in compliance with the test rule for CAS# 98-09-9 

(benzenesulfonyl chloride). 

Study Name: Benzenesulfonyl chloride: Daphnia sp., 48-Hour Acute 

Immobilization Test (Project # 41201583) 

Study Name: Benzenesulfonyl chloride: Algal Inhibition Test (Project # 

41201584) 

We have enclosed one hard copy version of the study and the robust 

summary and have included one CD containing an electronic version 

of both the study and the robust summary. 

Should you have any questions, please contact me. 

Sincerely, 

Senior Regulatory Affairs Specialist llllll lllll Hill Hill Hil Hilt Hill HIH Hill HIH HLH HI 

4 0 1 3000003 3 

CONTAIN S N O CBt
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906

of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Safeguard
Scientifics, Inc. (Safeguard) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stephen T. Zarrilli, President and Chief
Executive Officer of Safeguard, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, (15 U.S.C. 78m(a)); and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Safeguard.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                                                                    
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.                                        
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: March 29, 2013 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Stephen T. Zarrilli                                            
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Stephen T. Zarrilli                                                
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134486 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 134486 

 COA: 268465 

Oakland CC: 05-202583-FC 

TERRENCE TERRELL MOORE,

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 12, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

l1119 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 29, 2007 

 Clerk
1 Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-10460

Summary Calendar

 

MALVIN EARL PORCHIA, Jr.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

CENTURY 21; COBY COBHAM,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

(3:96-CV-741-G)

- - - - - - - - - -

December 20, 1996

Before SMITH, DUHÉ, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:1

Malvin Earl Porchia appeals the dismissal of his civil rights

complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Porchia has failed

to state a cognizable § 1983 complaint because he alleged

violations of state law by private citizens. See Manax v.

McNamara, 842 F.2d 808, 812 (5th Cir. 1988). The district court

lacked subject-matter jurisdiction to hear the complaint. See

Getty Oil Corp., Div. of Texaco, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of North
Am., 841 F.2d 1254, 1258- 59 (5th Cir. 1988)(the citizenship of all

of the plaintiffs must be different from the citizenship of all of

the defendants); 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(1)(a corporation is a citizen

of both its state of incorporation and the state in which it has

its principal place of business). 

 Because the arguments of error are wholly without merit, this

appeal is frivolous. Coghlan v. Starkey, 852 F.2d 806, 811 (5th

Cir. 1988). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. 5th

Cir. R. 42.2. 

We caution Porchia that any additional frivolous appeals filed

by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition of sanctions.

To avoid sanctions, Porchia is further cautioned to review all

pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are

frivolous. 

 APPEAL DISMISSED. SANCTION WARNING GIVEN.
#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, *v.*Grand Union Company, Defendant.

Justice Court of Village of Suffern, Rockland County,

January 12, 1972.

*424
      *Robert R. Meehan, District Attorney (Reuben Ortenberg*of counsel), for plaintiff. *G. J. Sandalls*for defendant.

Terrence Ryan, J.

Defendant is charged with the crime of false advertising under section 202-a of the Agriculture and Markets Law, which states in part: False Advertising. 1. An advertisement concerning a food or food product shall not be false or misleading in any particular.

The evidence is clear and convincing that, on January 29, 1971, at its Suffern store, defendant sold various, specified food products at prices higher than those advertised by defendant in newspapers circulated in Suffern on January 27,1971.

However, the very section which provides criminal jurisdiction for violations of the Agriculture and Markets Law (§ 41) takes it away in this case. ‘ *‘*Violation of chapter A misdemeanor. Except as otherwise provided by the penal law, a person who by himself or another violates any of the provisions of this chapter or of any other law the enforcement of which is within the jurisdiction of the department, is guilty of a misdemeanor, and ”. This is so because the Penal Law contains section 190.20 (false advertising) which explicitly defines and proscribes the elements of the criminal activity of false advertising. Those elements are not coextensive with the elements of section 202-a of the Agriculture and Markets Law.

Defendant’s motions to dismiss are now granted, and the information is dismissed.
Exhibit 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF LAWSON SOFTWARE, INC
As of May 31, 2010

Subsidiary Corporation

JurisdictionConfer Software, Inc.

USACaliforniaLawson Software Americas, Inc.

USADelawareLawson Software USA, Inc.

USADelawareLawson Technologies, Inc.

USADelawareAccount4, Inc.

USADelawareApexion Technologies, Inc

USADelawareClosedloop Solutions, Inc.

USADelawareComputer Assessment Systems LLC

USADelawareHealthvision Solutions, Inc.

USADelawareHealthvision, Inc.

USADelawareLawson PLM, LLC

USADelawareLawson WFM, LLC

USADelawareLawson Software Africa (Proprietary) Ltd.

South AfricaLawson Software Australia Pty. Ltd.

AustraliaLawson Software Services Pty. Ltd.

AustraliaVoto Pty Ltd.

AustraliaLawson Software Austria EDV-Beratungs Ges.m.b.H.

AustriaLawson Americas Brasil LTDA

BrazilLawson Americas Chile Limitada

ChileLawson (Shanghai) Software and Technology Co. Ltd.

ChinaHV Solutions Shanghai, Inc.

ChinaIntentia CZ a.s.

Czech RepublicLawson Software Danmark A/S

DenmarkLawson Software Ltd.

EnglandLawson Software Finland Oy

FinlandKeyola Corporation

USAFloridaLawson Software Consulting France SAS

FranceLawson Software France SARL

FranceLawson Software Deutschland GmbH

GermanyLawson Software GmbH

GermanyLawson Software Asia Pacific (Branch)

Hong KongLawson Software Ireland Ltd.

IrelandLawson Software Consulting Italy SRL

ItalyLawsonSoftware Japan K.K.

JapanLawson Software Asia Pacific (Branch)

KoreaLawson Software Asia Pacific (Branch)

MalaysiaLawson Americas Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V.

MexicoLawson Software Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V.

MexicoLawson Software Benelux B.V.

NetherlandsLawson Software Netherlands B.V

NetherlandsLawson Software New Zealand Limited

New ZealandLawson Software Norge AS

NorwayLawson Software Inc. RQHQ (Philippine branch)

PhilippinesLawson PSSC, Inc.

PhilippinesLawson Software Polska Sp.z o.o.

PolandIntentia Consulting Portugal Informática SA

PortugalHV Solutions Canada Inc.

CanadaLawson Software Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd.

SingaporeLawson Software Consulting S.A.U.

SpainLawson International AB

SwedenLawson International ABBranch Switzerland

SwedenLawson Software Sweden AB

SwedenLawson Software Finance SA

SwitzerlandLawson Software Switzerland A.G.

SwitzerlandLawson Software (Switzerland) Vaud Sarl

SwitzerlandMINORITY OWNED SUBSIDIARIESScase AS

NorwayLawson Software Thailand Co. Ltd. (Intentia Thailand BP)

Thailand


---
# C_2019126EN.01000102.xml

| 5.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 126/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 126/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9253 — Mercuria/Aegean)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 126/02)

On 29 March 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9253. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9253. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
(a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;(b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;(c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based upon
such evaluation; and(d)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and(b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 /s/ James L. Hambrick
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 71 (Monday, April 14, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 18107]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-9498]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP96-200-020]


NorAm Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

April 8, 1997.
    Take notice that on April 3, 1997, NorAm Gas Transmission Company 
(NGT) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Fourth 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff sheets to be 
effective April 1, 1997:

Fifth Revised Sheet No. 7A

Substitute Fifth Revised Sheet No. 7B
Fifth Revised Sheet No. 7C
Fifth Revised Sheet No. 7D
Third Revised Sheet No. 7E
First Revised Sheet No. 7G
First Revised Sheet No. 7G.01
First Revised Sheet No. 7H
Original Sheet No. 7I
Original Sheet No. 7J
Original Sheet No. 7K
Original Sheet No. 7L
Second Revised Sheet No. 8
Sheet No. 9-11

    NGT states that these tariff sheets are filed herewith to reflect 
specific negotiated rate transactions commencing the month of April, 
1997.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211). All such protests 
must be filed as provided in Sec. 154.210 of the Commission's 
regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestant parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on 
file with the Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-9498 Filed 4-11-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
**EXHIBIT
31.1**
 ****
 ****
 **302
CERTIFICATION**
 ****
 
 I, R.H.
Wollenberg, certify that:
   1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Longview Fibre Company;
   2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
   3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
   4. The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
   (a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
   (b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and
   (c)
disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect the
control over financial reporting; and
   5. The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
   (a) all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
   (b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.
   **R.
H. WOLLENBERG**     6 /09/05
   R. H.
WOLLENBERG,
 President,
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
No. 11-1531.

#### Gray et al. *v.*Citigroup Inc. et al.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.