## 70441 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 228 / Wednesday, November 26, 2014 / Rules and Regulations

4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Examining the AD Docket

You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at http://www.regulations. gov/#!docketDetail;D=FAA-2014-0191; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other
information. The street address for the Docket Operations office (telephone 800–647–5527) is in the **ADDRESSES** 

### section.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:

**PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS**
**DIRECTIVES**

■ 

### 1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

**§ 39.13 [Amended]**

■ 

### 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD):

2014–23–14 Bombardier, Inc.: Amendment 39–18030. Docket No. FAA–2014–0191;
Directorate Identifier 2013–NM–256–AD.

(a) Effective Date

This AD becomes effective December 31,

2014.

(b) Affected ADs

None.

(c) Applicability

This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc. Model DHC–8–400, –401, and –402 airplanes; certificated in any category; serial numbers 4001, and 4003 through 4417 inclusive, with installed engine fuel feed ejector pump having part number (P/N) 2960008–102.

(d) Subject

Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 28, Fuel.

(e) Reason

This AD was prompted by reports of swing arm assemblies of engine fuel feed ejector pumps detaching from the outlet port of the engine fuel feed ejector pump and partially blocking the engine fuel feed line. We are issuing this AD to prevent blocked engine fuel flow and possible engine flameout.

(f) Compliance

Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, unless already
done.

(g) Installation

Within 6,000 flight hours or 36 months, whichever occurs first, after the effective date of this AD, install a restrictor into the engine fuel feed line, in accordance with paragraph 3.B., ‘‘Procedure,’’ of the Accomplishment
Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin 84–28–16, Revision B, dated June 17, 2013.

(h) Credit for Previous Actions

This paragraph provides credit for actions required by paragraph (g) of this AD, if those actions were performed before the effective date of this AD using Bombardier Service Bulletin 84–28–16, dated July 16, 2012; or Bombardier Service Bulletin 84–28–16, Revision A, dated May 23, 2013; which are not incorporated by reference in this AD.

(i) Other FAA AD Provisions

The following provisions also apply to this

AD:

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New York ACO, ANE–170, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the ACO, send it to ATTN: Program Manager, Continuing Operational Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone 516–228–7300; fax 516–794–5531. Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding district office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD.

(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer, the action must be accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, New York ACO, ANE–170, Engine and Propeller Directorate, FAA; or TCCA; or Bombardier, Inc.’s TCCA Design Approval Organization (DAO). If approved by the DAO, the approval must include the DAO-authorized signature.

(j) Related Information

(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information (MCAI) Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF–2013–35, dated November 15, 2013, for related information. This MCAI may be found in the AD docket
on the Internet at http://www.regulations. gov/#!documentDetail;D=FAA-2014-0191-

0002.

(2) Service information identified in this AD that is not incorporated by reference is available at the addresses specified in paragraphs (k)(3) and (k)(4) of this AD.

(k) Material Incorporated by Reference

(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.

(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.

(i) Bombardier Service Bulletin 84–28–16, Revision B, dated June 17, 2013.

(ii) Reserved. (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact Bombardier, Inc., Q-Series Technical Help Desk, 123 Garratt Boulevard, Toronto, Ontario M3K 1Y5, Canada; telephone 416–375–4000; fax 416–375–4539;
email thd.qseries@aero.bombardier.com ; Internet http://www.bombardier.com.

(4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.

(5) You may view this service information that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.

Issued in Renton, Washington, on November 6, 2014. Jeffrey E. Duven Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.

[FR Doc. 2014–27357 Filed 11–25–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–13–P**



### DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

**Federal Aviation Administration**

**14 CFR Part 39**

**[Docket No. FAA–2014–0170; Directorate Identifier 2013–NM–169–AD; Amendment**  **39–18027; AD 2014–23–11]**

**RIN 2120–AA64**



### Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing **Company Airplanes**

**AGENCY** 

### : Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

**ACTION** 

### : Final rule.

**SUMMARY** 

### : We are superseding Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2005–13– 05, which applied to certain Boeing Model 747–400F series airplanes. AD 2005–13–05 required inspections for cracking of the web, upper chord, and upper chord strap of the upper deck floor beams, and repair of any cracking. AD 2005–13–05 also required a preventive modification of the upper deck floor beams, and repetitive inspections for cracking after accomplishing the modification. This
new AD retains these actions and requires a second modification, repetitive inspections for cracking, and


## 70442 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 228 / Wednesday, November 26, 2014 / Rules and Regulations

repair if necessary. This AD was prompted by a determination that the upper chords of the upper deck floor
beams at certain stations are structures that are susceptible to widespread fatigue damage, and that certain airplanes with an initial modification require a second modification for the airplane to meet its limit of validity (LOV). We are issuing this AD to detect and correct fatigue cracking in certain upper chords of the upper deck floor beam, which could result in reduced structural integrity of the airplane and rapid decompression or reduced controllability of the airplane.

**DATES** 

### : This AD is effective December

31, 2014.

The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of December 31, 2014.

The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of a certain other publication listed in this AD as of July 27, 2005 (70 FR 35989, June 22, 2005).

**ADDRESSES** 

### : For service information identified in this AD, contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65, Seattle, WA 98124–2207; telephone 206–544–5000, extension 1; fax 206–766–5680; Internet https:// www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call 425–227–1221.

Examining the AD Docket

You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at http:// www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA–2014– 0170; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the Docket Office (phone: 800–647–5527) is Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M–30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,

DC 20590.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT**

### : Nathan Weigand, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM–120S, FAA,
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356; phone: 425–917–6428; fax: 425–917–6590; email: Nathan.P.Weigand@faa.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION** 

### :

Discussion

We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR part 39 to supersede AD 2005–13–05, Amendment 39–14141 (70 FR 35989, June 22, 2005). AD 2005–13–05 applied to certain Boeing Model 747–400F series airplanes. The NPRM published in the Federal Register on March 25, 2014 (79 FR 16241). The NPRM was prompted by a determination that the upper chords of the upper deck floor beams at certain
stations are structures that are susceptible to widespread fatigue damage, and that certain airplanes with an initial modification require a second modification for the airplane to meet its LOV. The NPRM proposed to continue to require inspections for cracking of the web, upper chord, and upper chord strap of the upper deck floor beams, and repair of any cracking; a preventive modification of the upper deck floor beams; and repetitive inspections for cracking after accomplishing the modification. The NPRM proposed to also require a second modification, repetitive inspections for cracking, and repair if necessary. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct fatigue cracking in certain upper chords of the upper deck floor beam, which could result in reduced structural integrity of the airplane and rapid decompression or reduced controllability of the airplane.

Comments

We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing this AD. The following presents the comments received on the NPRM (79 FR 16241, March 25, 2014) and the FAA’s response
to each comment. Request To Clarify Post-Modification Inspection Options

Boeing requested that we revise paragraphs (j) and (l) of the NPRM (79 FR 16241, March 25, 2014) to clarify that the inspection options of paragraphs (j)(2) and (l)(2) are applicable only when the primary preventative modification option has been accomplished. Boeing stated that Boeing Service Bulletin 747–53A2443, Revision 2, dated August 2, 2013, added an alternative preventative modification option for which the inspection options of paragraphs (j)(2) and (l)(2) of this AD
are not viable.

We agree with the commenter’s request because these words add clarity as to which inspection option should be used. We have revised paragraphs (j) and (l) of this AD by stating that, as of the effective date of this AD, for airplanes on which the alternative preventive modification has been accomplished, only the inspection methods specified by paragraphs (j)(1) and (l)(1), respectively, of this AD may
be used.

Conclusion

We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comment received, and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting this AD with the changes described previously and minor editorial changes. We have determined that these minor changes:

• Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the NPRM (79 FR 16241, March 25, 2014) for correcting the unsafe condition; and

• Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was already proposed in the NPRM (79 FR 16241, March 25, 2014).

We also determined that these changes will not increase the economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this AD.

Costs of Compliance

We estimate that this AD affects 13 airplanes of U.S. registry.

We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:



### E STIMATED 

### COSTS

Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product Cost on U.S. operators

Pre-modification inspections (retained actions from

AD 2005–13–05, Amendment 39–14141 (70 FR 35989, June 22, 2005)). 11 work-hours × $85 per hour = $935. $0 ..................... $935 $12,155.

Modification/inspections done during modification

(retained actions from AD 2005–13–05, Amendment 39–14141 (70 FR 35989, June 22, 2005)). Up to 524 work-hours × $85 per hour = $44,540. Up to $14,874 .. 59,414 $772,382.


## 70443 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 228 / Wednesday, November 26, 2014 / Rules and Regulations

E STIMATED 

### COSTS

### —Continued

Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product Cost on U.S. operators

Post-modification inspections (retained actions from

AD 2005–13–05, Amendment 39–14141 (70 FR 35989, June 22, 2005)). 66 work-hours × $85 per hour = $5,610. $0 ..................... 5,610 $72,930.

Zero-Timing Procedure Option 1 (including inspections) (new action). 71 work-hours × $85 per hour = $6,035. $0 ..................... 6,035 Up to $78,455.

Zero-Timing Procedure Option 2 (including inspections) (new action). 103 work-hours × $85 per hour = $8,755. $0 ..................... 8,755 Up to $113,815.



### We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide cost
estimates for the on-condition actions specified in this AD.

Authority for This Rulemaking

Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA’s authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the Agency’s authority.

We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking

action.

Regulatory Findings

We have determined that this AD will not have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.

For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:

(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866,

(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),

(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and

(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:

**PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS**
**DIRECTIVES**

■ 

### 1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

**§ 39.13 [Amended]**

■ 

### 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2005–13–05, Amendment 39–14141 (70 FR 35989, June 22, 2005), and adding the following new AD:

2014–23–11 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39–18027 ; Docket No. FAA–2014–0170; Directorate Identifier

2013–NM–169–AD.

(a) Effective Date

This AD is effective December 31, 2014.

(b) Affected ADs

This AD replaces AD 2005–13–05, Amendment 39–14141 (70 FR 35989, June 22, 2005).

(c) Applicability

This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 747–400F series airplanes, certificated in any category, as identified in Boeing Service Bulletin 747–53A2443, Revision 2, dated August 2, 2013.

(d) Subject

Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53, Fuselage.

(e) Unsafe Condition

This AD was prompted by a report indicating that the upper chords of the upper deck floor beams at stations (STA) 340 through 520 have been determined to be structures that are susceptible to widespread fatigue damage, and airplanes that had an initial modification done before 15,000 total flight cycles require a second fastener hole zero-timing modification for the airplane to meet its limit of validity (LOV). We are issuing this AD to detect and correct fatigue cracking in certain upper chords of the upper deck floor beam, which could result in reduced structural integrity of the airplane and rapid decompression or reduced controllability of the airplane.

(f) Compliance

Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, unless already
done.

(g) Retained Inspections With Revised
Service Information

This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (g) of AD 2005–13–05, Amendment 39–14141 (70 FR 35989, June 22, 2005), with revised service information. Before the accumulation of 15,000 total flight cycles, or within 1,000 flight cycles after July 27, 2005 (the effective date of AD 2005–13– 05), whichever is later: Accomplish detailed and open-hole high frequency eddy current (HFEC) inspections for cracking of the web, upper chord, and upper chord strap of the upper deck floor beams, by doing all the applicable actions in accordance with Part 3.B.1. of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 747–53A2443, dated May 9, 2002; or Part 1 of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 747–53A2443, Revision 2, dated August 2, 2013. As of the effective date of this AD, only Boeing Service Bulletin 747– 53A2443, Revision 2, dated August 2, 2013, may be used.

(h) Retained Repair With Revised Service Information and Revised Repair Approval Language

This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (h) of AD 2005–13–05, Amendment 39–14141 (70 FR 35989, June 22, 2005), with revised service information and revised repair approval language. If any crack is found during any inspection required by paragraph (g) of this AD: Before further flight, accomplish the actions required by paragraph (h)(1) and (h)(2) of this

AD.

(1) Repair in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 747–53A2443, dated May 9, 2002; or the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 747–53A2443, Revision 2, dated August 2, 2013; except where these service bulletins specify to contact Boeing for appropriate action, before further flight, repair the cracking using a method approved in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (o) of this AD. As of the effective date of this AD, only


## 70444 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 228 / Wednesday, November 26, 2014 / Rules and Regulations

Boeing Service Bulletin 747–53A2443, Revision 2, dated August 2, 2013, may be
used.

(2) Accomplish the inspections and preventive modification of the floor beams by doing all the actions in accordance with Part 3.B.2. or Part 3.B.3., as applicable, of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 747–53A2443, dated May 9, 2002; or Part 2 or Part 3, as applicable, of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 747–53A2443, Revision 2, dated August 2, 2013. If any crack is found during any inspection, before further flight, repair as required by paragraph (h)(1) of this AD. As of the effective date of this AD, only Boeing Service Bulletin 747–53A2443, Revision 2, dated August 2, 2013, may be
used.

(i) Retained Modification With Revised
Service Information

This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (i) of AD 2005–13–05, Amendment 39–14141 (70 FR 35989, June 22, 2005), with
revised service information. If no crack is found during any inspection required by paragraph (g) of this AD: Accomplish the actions required by either paragraph (i)(1) or (i)(2) of this AD, at the time specified.

(1) Before further flight: Accomplish the inspections and preventive modification of the floor beam by doing all the actions in accordance with Part 3.B.2 or Part 3.B.3., as applicable, of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 747– 53A2443, dated May 9, 2002; or Part 2 or Part 3, as applicable, of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 747– 53A2443, Revision 2, dated August 2, 2013. If the preventive modification is performed concurrently with the inspections required by paragraph (g) of this AD, the upper chord straps must be removed when performing the open-hole HFEC inspection. If any crack is found during any inspection, before further flight, repair as required by paragraph (h)(1) of this AD. As of the effective date of this AD, only Boeing Service Bulletin 747–53A2443, Revision 2, dated August 2, 2013, may be
used.

(2) Before the accumulation of 20,000 total flight cycles, or within 1,000 flight cycles after July 27, 2005 (the effective date of AD 2005–13–05, Amendment 39–14141 (70 FR 35989, June 22, 2005), whichever is later: Accomplish the inspections and preventive modification of the upper deck floor beams, by doing all the actions in accordance with Part 3.B.2. or 3.B.3. as applicable, of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 747–53A2443, dated May 9, 2002; or Part 2 or Part 3, as applicable, of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 747–53A2443, Revision 2, dated August 2, 2013. If any crack is found during any inspection, before further flight, repair as required by paragraph (h)(1) of this AD. As of the effective date of this AD, only Boeing Service Bulletin 747–53A2443, Revision 2, dated August 2, 2013, may be
used.

(j) Retained Post-Modification Inspections
With Revised Service Information

This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (j) of AD 2005–13–05, Amendment 39–14141 (70 FR 35989, June 22, 2005), with revised service information. Within 15,000 flight cycles after accomplishing the applicable preventive modification required by paragraph (h)(2), (i)(1), or (i)(2) of this AD: Accomplish the applicable inspections required by either paragraph (j)(1) or (j)(2) of this AD; if any crack is found during any inspection, before further flight, repair as required by paragraph (h)(1) of this AD. As of the effective date of this AD, for airplanes on which the alternative preventive modification, as identified in the NOTE after step 3. of ‘‘PART 2—INSPECTION AND PREVENTIVE MODIFICATION,’’ or as identified in the NOTE after step 4. of ‘‘PART

3—INSPECTION AND PREVENTIVE MODIFICATION,’’ of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 747– 53A2443, Revision 2, dated August 2, 2013, has been done, only the inspection specified by paragraph (j)(1) of this AD may be used.

(1) Accomplish detailed and surface HFEC inspections for cracking of the web, upper chord, and upper chord strap of the upper deck floor beams, by doing all the applicable
actions in accordance with Part 3.B.4. of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 747–53A2443, dated May 9, 2002; or Part 4 of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 747– 53A2443, Revision 2, dated August 2, 2013. If no crack is found, repeat the inspections at intervals not to exceed 1,000 flight cycles. As of the effective date of this AD, only Boeing Service Bulletin 747–53A2443, Revision 2, dated August 2, 2013, may be
used.

(2) Accomplish detailed and open-hole HFEC inspections for cracking of the web, upper chord, and strap of the upper deck floor beams, by doing all the applicable
actions in accordance with Part 3.B.5. of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 747–53A2443, dated May 9, 2002; or Part 5 of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 747– 53A2443, Revision 2, dated August 2, 2013. If no crack is found, repeat the inspections at intervals not to exceed 5,000 flight cycles. As of the effective date of this AD, only Boeing Service Bulletin 747–53A2443, Revision 2, dated August 2, 2013, may be
used.

(k) New Floor Beam Hole Zero-Timing

Within 20,000 flight cycles after accomplishing the preventive modification of the Station 340 to Station 520 upper deck floor beams specified in paragraph (h)(2), (i)(1), or (i)(2) of this AD, or within 1,000 flight cycles after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later: Accomplish the floor beam hole zero-timing, in accordance with Part 6 of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 747– 53A2443, Revision 2, dated August 2, 2013.

(l) New Post-Modification Floor Beam Hole Zero-Timing Inspections

Within 15,000 flight cycles afteraccomplishing the floor beam hole zerotiming required by paragraph (k) of this AD: Accomplish the applicable inspections required by paragraph (l)(1) or (l)(2) of this AD; if any cracking is found during any inspection, before further flight, repair as required by paragraph (h)(1) of this AD. As of the effective date of this AD, for airplanes on which the alternative preventive modification, as identified in the NOTE after step 3. of ‘‘PART 2—INSPECTION AND PREVENTIVE MODIFICATION,’’ or as identified in the NOTE after step 4. of ‘‘PART

3—INSPECTION AND PREVENTIVE MODIFICATION,’’ of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 747– 53A2443, Revision 2, dated August 2, 2013, has been done, only the inspection method specified by paragraph (l)(1) of this AD may
be used.

(1) Accomplish detailed and surface HFEC inspections for cracking of the web, upper chord, and straps of the Station 340 to Station 520 upper deck floor beams, by doing all the applicable actions, in accordance with Part 4 of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 747–53A2443, Revision 2, dated August 2, 2013. If no cracking is found, repeat the inspections at intervals not to exceed 1,000 flight cycles.

(2) Accomplish detailed and open-hole HFEC inspections for cracking of the web, upper chord, and straps of the Station 340 to Station 520 upper deck floor beams, by doing all the applicable actions, in accordance with Part 5 of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 747–53A2443, Revision 2, dated August 2, 2013. If no cracking is found, repeat the inspections at intervals not to exceed 5,000 flight cycles.

(m) Exception to Service Information

Where Boeing Service Bulletin 747– 53A2443, Revision 2, dated August 2, 2013, specifies a compliance time ‘‘after the revision date on this service bulletin,’’ this AD requires compliance within the specified compliance time after the effective date of
this AD.

(n) Credit for Previous Actions

This paragraph provides credit for the inspections, repairs, and modification required by paragraphs (g) through (j) of this AD, if the corresponding actions were performed before the effective date of this AD using Boeing Service Bulletin 747–53A2443, Revision 1, dated June 25, 2009.

(o) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the attention of the person identified in paragraph (p)(1) of this AD. Information may
be emailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOCRequests@faa.gov.

(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district office/ certificate holding district office.

(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be used for any repair required by this AD if it is approved by


## 70445 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 228 / Wednesday, November 26, 2014 / Rules and Regulations

Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to make those findings. For a repair method to be approved, the repair must meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must specifically refer to this AD.

(4) AMOCs approved for AD 2005–13–05, Amendment 39–14141 (70 FR 35989, June 22, 2005), are approved as AMOCs for the corresponding requirements of paragraphs (g) through (j) (the retained actions) of this AD.

(p) Related Information

(1) For more information about this AD, contact Nathan Weigand, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM–120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356; phone: 425–917–6428; fax: 425– 917–6590; email: Nathan.P.Weigand@faa.gov.

(2) Service information identified in this AD that is not incorporated by reference is available at the addresses specified in paragraphs (q)(5) and (q)(6) of this AD.

(q) Material Incorporated by Reference

(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.

(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.

(3) The following service information was approved for IBR on December 31, 2014.

(i) Boeing Service Bulletin 747–53A2443, Revision 2, dated August 2, 2013.

(ii) Reserved. (4) The following service information was approved for IBR on July 27, 2005 (70 FR 35989, June 22, 2005).

(i) Boeing Service Bulletin 747–53A2443, dated May 9, 2002.

(ii) Reserved. (5) For service information identified in this AD, contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65, Seattle, WA 98124–2207; telephone 206– 544–5000, extension 1; fax 206–766–5680;

Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.

(6) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.

(7) You may view this service information that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.

Issued in Renton, Washington, on November 6, 2014. Jeffrey E. Duven, Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.

[FR Doc. 2014–27358 Filed 11–25–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–13–P** 

### DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

**Federal Aviation Administration**

**14 CFR Part 39**

**[Docket No. FAA–2014–0174; Directorate Identifier 2013–NM–212–AD; Amendment**  **39–18028; AD 2014–23–12]**

**RIN 2120–AA64**



### Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing **Company Airplanes**

**AGENCY** 

### : Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

**ACTION** 

### : Final rule.

**SUMMARY** 

### : We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain The Boeing Company Model 787–8 airplanes. This AD was prompted by a report indicating that, on a different Boeing airplane model, there was an oxygen-fed fire, which caused extensive damage to the flight deck. This AD requires replacing the low-pressure oxygen hoses with non-conductive hoses in the crew oxygen system. We are issuing this AD to prevent
inadvertent electrical current frompassing through an internal, anticollapse spring of the low pressureoxygen hose, which can cause the lowpressure oxygen hose to melt or burn, leading to an oxygen-fed fire and/or smoke beneath the flight deck in the forward electronics equipment bay.

**DATES** 

### : This AD is effective December

31, 2014.

The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of December 31, 2014.

**ADDRESSES** 

### : For Boeing service information identified in this AD, contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65, Seattle, WA 98124–2207; telephone 206–544–5000, extension 1; fax 206–766–5680; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. For B/E Aerospace service information identified in this AD, contact B/E Aerospace, Inc., Commercial Aircraft Products Group, 10800 Pfluum Road, Lenexa, KS 66215; phone: 913–338– 9800; fax: 913–469–8419. You may view
this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call 425–227–1221.

Examining the AD Docket

You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at http:// www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA–2014– 0174; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the Docket Office (phone: 800–647–5527) is Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M–30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,

DC 20590.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT**

### : Susan Monroe, Aerospace Engineer, Cabin Safety and Environmental Systems Branch, ANM–150S, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057– 3356; phone: 425–917–6457; fax: 425– 917–6590; email: susan.l.monroe@ faa.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION** 

### :

Discussion

We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain The Boeing Company Model 787–8 airplanes. The NPRM published in the Federal Register on March 28, 2014 (79 FR 17457). The NPRM was prompted by a report indicating that, on a different Boeing airplane model, there was an oxygen-fed fire, which caused extensive damage to the flight deck. The NPRM proposed to require replacing the low-pressure oxygen hoses with non-conductive hoses in the crew oxygen system. We are issuing this AD to prevent
inadvertent electrical current frompassing through an internal, anticollapse spring of the low pressureoxygen hose, which can cause the lowpressure oxygen hose to melt or burn, leading to an oxygen-fed fire and/or smoke beneath the flight deck in the forward electronics equipment bay.

Comments

We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing this AD. The following presents the comments received on the NPRM (79 FR 17457, March 28, 2014) and the FAA’s response
to each comment.

Boeing, United Airlines, and John Johnson stated that they support the NPRM (79 FR 17457, March 28, 2014).

Request To Shorten Compliance Time

The Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA) stated that it supports the intent of the NPRM (79 FR 17457, March 28, 2014) but that the 60-month compliance