alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2019269EN.01000401.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 12.8.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/4 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9493 — Triton/Aleris)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 269/04)

1.

On 5 August 2019, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2019269EN.01000401-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Triton Managers V Limited (Jersey) and Triton Fund V GP S.à.r.l. (Luxembourg), belonging to the Triton group of managed funds (‘Triton’, Luxembourg), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Aleris Healthcare AB and Aleris Imaging AB (together ‘Aleris’, Sweden). |

Triton acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of Aleris.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for Triton: an investment firm that invests primarily in German-speaking countries, the Nordic countries, the Benelux region, France, Italy, Spain and the United Kingdom,

—   for Aleris: a Scandinavian private provider of specialty healthcare with a versatile offering of specialist care and diagnostic services.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2019269EN.01000401-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9493 — Triton/Aleris

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2019269EN.01000401-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2019269EN.01000401-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2019414EN.01003201.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 10.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 414/32 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9521— Bamesa/Sumitomo/Steel Centre Europe)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 414/10)

1.

On 3 December 2019, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2019414EN.01003201-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Bamesa Aceros S.L. (‘Bamesa’, Spain), controlled by ARMASFI S.L., |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Sumitomo Corporation (‘Sumitomo’, Japan), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Steel Centre Europe s.r.o. (‘SCE’, Czech Republic). |

Bamesa and Sumitomo acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of the whole of SCE. Prior to the transaction, Sumitomo was already a shareholder in SCE.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for Bamesa: distribution of steel through steel service centres, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for Sumitomo: trading of metal products, transportation and construction systems, environment and infrastructure, chemicals and electronics, media, networks and lifestyle related goods, mineral resources, energy and life sciences, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for SCE: distribution of steel through steel service centres, mainly in the Czech Republic. |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2019414EN.01003201-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M. 9521 — Bamesa/Sumitomo/Steel Centre Europe

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2019414EN.01003201-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2019414EN.01003201-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
#### State v. Timmons

108,403

08/30/13

Denied. .

Unpublished
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 69 (Thursday, April 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 17610]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-9284]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-103-001]


OkTex Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas 
Tariff

April 4, 1997.
    Take notice that on April 1, 1997, OkTex Pipeline Company (OkTex) 
tendered for filing to become part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original 
Volume No. 1, the tariff sheets listed on the filing, with an effective 
date of June 1, 1997.
    OkTex states that the filing is made to comply with the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission's February 14, 1997 Letter Order, Order 
No. 587, ``Standards for Business Practices of Interstate Natural Gas 
Pipelines,'' III FERC Stats. & Regs. Regulations Preambles para. 31,039 
(``Final Rule''), and Order No. 587-B, ``Standards for Business 
Practices of Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines,'' 78 FERC para. 61,076 
(1997), adopting certain standardized business practices and electronic 
communication practices promulgated by the Gas Industry Standards Board 
(``GISB'') and requiring pipelines to comply with the requirements of 
the GISB standards by incorporating the GISB standards by reference 
into the Commission's Regulations. OkTex moved that the Commission 
permit the tariff sheets to become effective June 1, 1997, as required 
by the staggered implementation schedule set forth in the Final Rule.
    OkTex states that copies of the filing were served upon the 
official service list compiled by the Secretary in this proceeding.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed on 
or before April 21, 1997. Protests will be considered by the Commission 
in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve 
to make the protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this 
filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public 
inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-9284 Filed 4-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
|                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                           
|View History:                                                            
|                                                                         
|Natural Gas Citygate Price in Colorado  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                         
|                                                                         
|Natural Gas Citygate Price in Colorado  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        | 3.81   | 3.55   | 3.35   | 3.15   | 3.07   | 2.96  
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 2.94   | 2.85   | 2.85   | 2.95   | 3.31   | 2.65   | 2.70   | 2.92   | 2.40   | 2.31  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 3.53   | 4.25   | 2.72   | 4.11   | 5.02   | 6.10   | 7.61   | 6.23   | 6.98   | 5.09  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 5.26   | 4.94   | 4.26   | 4.76   | 5.42   | 3.98   | 3.56   | 3.90   | 3.63   | 3.38  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2.74   | 6.81   | 6.61   | 5.58   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

EXHIBIT 10.16
  EXHIBIT 10.17
  EXHIBIT 10.18
  
    TERMINATION OF REPURCHASE AGREEMENT    
    



        This Termination of Repurchase Agreement ("Termination") is made and entered into this 26th day of June, 2003, by and between Forrest Jordan ("Shareholder") and
Ponca Acquisition Corporation (the "Company"). (Individually each a "Party" and together, the "Parties"). 


RECITALS




	A.
	On
October 1, 2002, as part of the Company's acquisition of all of Shareholder's shares of International Wholesale Tile, Inc., the Parties entered into a Repurchase
Agreement (the "Agreement").



	B.
	The
Parties now wish to terminate the Agreement pursuant to which the Agreement shall be of no further force or effect and be deemed null and void. . 




        NOW
THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which each hereby acknowledges, the Parties agree as follows: 


	1.
	The
Agreement is terminated as of June 26, 2003 and shall be of no further force or effect.



	2.
	This
Agreement shall be governed by Nevada law, without giving effect to any conflict of laws principles. 



        IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date set forth above. 



	SHAREHOLDER	 	IWT TESORO CORPORATION
	

/s/  FORREST JORDAN      
 Forrest Jordan	
 	

By:	

/s/  HENRY J. BOUCHER, JR.      
 Henry J. Boucher, Jr. President











QuickLinks


EXHIBIT 10.16 EXHIBIT 10.17 EXHIBIT 10.18 TERMINATION OF REPURCHASE AGREEMENT
|                                                                                
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                  
|View History:                                                                   
|                                                                                
|Georgia Natural Gas Deliveries to Electric Power Consumers  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                
|                                                                                
|Georgia Natural Gas Deliveries to Electric Power Consumers  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |         | 17,054  | 33,351  | 32,505 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 42,034  | 34,666  | 56,588  | 32,258  | 45,926  | 72,267  | 95,407  | 121,726 | 96,316  | 142,467
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 175,082 | 196,492 | 308,096 | 279,506 | 289,972 | 355,698 | 379,284 | 370,073 | 373,647 | 427,142
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 426,677 | 403,547 | 427,672 | 443,550 |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
#### COM. v. TORO, J.

1727 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/11/2017

CP-39-CR-0004647-2012

(Lehigh)

Affirmed
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary information extracted from the Form 10-Q and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000820068
<NAME> NEW YORK BANCORP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996  
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          12,500
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    561,630
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         564,680
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           547,571
<LOANS>                                      1,957,957
<ALLOWANCE>                                     19,767
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,174,997
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,709,232
<SHORT-TERM>                                 1,235,447
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             69,699
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           221
<OTHER-SE>                                     160,398
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               3,174,997
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 78,636
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               35,834
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    13
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               114,483
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              27,761
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              56,327
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           58,156
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,500
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 630
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 26,312
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 41,109
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      24,177
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    24,177
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.40
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.91
<LOANS-NON>                                     28,183
<LOANS-PAST>                                     4,830
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 5,535
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                19,386
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,255
<RECOVERIES>                                       136
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               19,767
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            19,767
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          5,400
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 72 (Tuesday, April 15, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 18264]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-9578]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 97-ANE-02]


Amendment to Class E Airspace; New Haven, CT

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action confirms the effective date of a direct final rule 
which modified the Class E airspace at New Haven, CT (KHVN) by removing 
the Class E airspace extending upward from the surface, effective 
during the times when the Airport Traffic Control Tower (ATCT) is not 
operating. The final rule resulted from the lack of continuous weather 
reporting at Tweed-New Haven Municipal Airport.

EFFECTIVE DATE: The direct final rule was effective on 0901 UTC, March 
27, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Raymond Duda, Operations Branch, ANE-530.3, Federal Aviation 
Administration, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803-
5299; telephone: (617) 238-7533; fax (617) 238-7596.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA published this direct final rule 
with a request for comments in the Federal Register on February 7, 1997 
(62 FR 5755). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a 
non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no 
adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that 
no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse 
comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse 
comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would 
become effective on March 27, 1997. No adverse comments were received, 
and thus this document confirms that the final rule became effective on 
that date.

    Issued in Burlington, MA, on April 8, 1997.
John J. Boyce,
Assistant Manager, Air Traffic Division, New England Region.
[FR Doc. 97-9578 Filed 4-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
|                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                    
|View History:                                                     
|                                                                  
|Wisconsin Natural Gas Industrial Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                  
|                                                                  
|Wisconsin Natural Gas Industrial Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |         | 155,677 | 141,980 | 145,703
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 151,923 | 132,982 | 137,706 | 137,605 | 141,084 | 130,570 | 118,396 | 121,111 | 127,818 | 119,711
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 121,408 | 126,856 | 124,338 | 136,034 | 141,661 | 136,709 | 144,801 | 154,920 | 164,613 | 162,622
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 153,714 | 149,841 | 150,232 | 141,686 |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
#### State v. Meitler

111,697

06/29/2015

Denied

51 Kan. App. 2d 308