alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2019074EN.01000101.xml

| 27.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 74/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 74/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9258 — ANTA Sports Products/FountainVest China Capital Partners GP3/Amer Sports)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 74/01)

On 19 February 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9258. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9258. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Hon. Joe Gordon Opinion No. O-2167 

County Attorney Re: Eligibility of certain bonds voted 

Gray County by Gray County prior to January 2 1939, 

Pampa, Texas to participate in the County and Road 

District Righway Fund provided in H.B. 

688, Forty-sixth Legislature, Regular 

Dear Sir: Session. 

We are in receipt of your request for the opinion 

of this department on the following question: 

"May-Gray County now issue a portion of the 

$500 000 of the original $800,000 bona issue 

whit h were voted in 1931 and use the proceeds 

thereof for the construction of State Highway 

18 in Gray County under the provisions of H.B. 

688 and particularly Section 6(a), paragraph 

3 thereof and will such bonds.be eligible to 

participaJe in the County and Road District 

Highway Fund, the same as if the bonds were issued and spent prior to January 2, 1.9391" 

Briefly, the facts underlying your question are that 

in March of 1931 Gray County authorized by vote the issuance 

of $800 000 of bonds for State highway purposes, and out of 

such au e horization only @&,OOO of this issue were sold; none 

of the remaining bonds have ever been issued. 

We think, under the facts stated that such bonds 

would, when issued and the proceeds there0 h expended in the construction of roads constituting a part of the State Highway System, be eligible for participation in the County and Road District Highway Fund provided by House Bill 688 of the Forty-sixth 

Legislature, Regular Session. Clearly, under this state of facts, 

the bonds come within the exception provided in paragraph 3, subsection (a), section 6 of H.B. 688, which reads, in part, as follows: 

"In addition to, and regardless of, the other 

provisions of this Act, all bonds voted by a county 

prior to January 2, 1939, insofar as amounts of 

same were or may be issued and the proceeds actually 
Hon. Joe Gordon, page 2 

expended in the construction of roads which are 

a part of the designated system of State highways, shall be eligible in the distribution of 

moneys coming into said County and Road District 

Highway Fund the same as provided for other 

bonds under t his Act, and as of the date of the 

designation of said roads as a part of the State 

System ***n 

We are enclosing herewith our Opinion Number o-1334, 

which treats of this exception in detail and the conclusion 

therein reached, in our opinion, substan c ially answers the 

question submitted in your request. 

Very truly yours 

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

*By s/s Clarence E. Crowe 

Clarence E. Crowe, Assistant 

APPROVED MAY 6,194o 

/s/ Gerald C. Mann 

ATTORNEY G3NERAL OF TEXAS 

APPROVED: OPINIONCOVCO~TEE 

BY: m, 

CEC-s:wb 

Encl.
# C_2018273EN.01000101.xml

| 3.8.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 273/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 273/1

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 273/01)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 23.04.2018 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.49077 (2017/N) |
| Member State | Croatia |
| Region | Kontinentalna Hrvatska | — |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Državna potpora za štete od raznih vrsta ptica i ostalih životinja na šaranskim ribnjacima |
| Legal basis | Zakon o morskom ribarstvu (‘Narodne novine’, broj 62/2017), članak 55. |
| Type of measure | Scheme | — |
| Objective | Fisheries and aquaculture |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | Overall budget: HRK 180 (in millions)
  Annual budget: HRK 30 (in millions) |
| Intensity | 100 % |
| Duration (period) | until 31.12.2023 |
| Economic sectors | Freshwater aquaculture |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Ministarstvo poljoprivrede / Uprava ribarstva |
| Planinska 2a |

Date of adoption of the decision

23.04.2018

Aid number

SA.49077 (2017/N)

Member State

Croatia

Region

Kontinentalna Hrvatska

—

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Državna potpora za štete od raznih vrsta ptica i ostalih životinja na šaranskim ribnjacima

Legal basis

Zakon o morskom ribarstvu (‘Narodne novine’, broj 62/2017), članak 55.

Type of measure

Scheme

—

Objective

Fisheries and aquaculture

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Overall budget: HRK 180 (in millions)

Annual budget: HRK 30 (in millions)

Intensity

100 %

Duration (period)

until 31.12.2023

Economic sectors

Freshwater aquaculture

Name and address of the granting authority

Ministarstvo poljoprivrede / Uprava ribarstva

Planinska 2a

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm.

---
~D S~q1.

~‘ 

### • t UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

~ REGION IX 

## %~, ~ 75 Hawthorne Street ~1’i~ ~ San Francisco, CA 94105 ‘~ PRO1 July 24, 2014

David C. Bloomfield, Plant Manager Arizona Public Service Company Four Corners Electric Power Station P.O. Box 355 Fruitland, NM 87416-0355 Re: Proposed Prevention ofSignificant Deterioration Permit for Four Corners Power Plant SCR Project Dear Mr. Bloomfield: EPA has completed its review ofyour application fora Clean AirAct Prevention ofSignificant Deterioration (PSD) permitto authorize the construction and operation ofthe selective catalytic reductions systems on Units 4 and 5 atthe Four Corners Power Plant (Project). We have prepared a proposed permit forthe Project. Enclosed is ourpublic notice, proposed permit, and Fact Sheetforthe Project. The public comment period will close on September24, 2012 and we will hold two public hearings

—one on August 27, 2014 atthe Nenahnezad Chapter House in Fruitland and one on August28, 2014 in San Juan College in Farmington. These and other documents related to the Project are also available on ourwebsite at: http://www.epa.gov/region9/air/permit/r9-permits-issued.html. Ifyou have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Lisa Beckham at415- 972-3811 or beckham.lisa~epa.gov.
Sincerel

Gerardo C. Rios Chief, Permits Office

Mark Hajduk, APS (via email) Chas Spell, APS (via email) Raju Bisht, Navajo Nation EPA (via email) Tennille Begay, Navajo Nation EPA (via email)
# C_2018284EN.01000501.xml

| 13.8.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 284/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.8.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 284/5

---

Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EU) 2015/735 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in South Sudan apply

(2018/C 284/05)

The attention of data subjects is drawn to the following information in accordance with Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1):

The legal basis for this processing operation is Council Regulation (EU) 2015/735 (2).

The controller of this processing operation is the Council of the European Union represented by the Director General of DG RELEX (Foreign Affairs, Enlargement, Civil Protection) of the General Secretariat of the Council and the department entrusted with the processing operation is DG RELEX 1C that can be contacted at:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG RELEX 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG RELEX 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The purpose of the processing operation is the establishment and updating of the list of persons subject to restrictive measures in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2015/735.

The data subjects are the natural persons who fulfil the listing criteria as laid down in that Regulation.

The personal data collected includes data necessary for the correct identification of the person concerned, the Statement of Reasons and any other data related thereto.

The personal data collected may be shared as necessary with the European External Action Service and the Commission.

Without prejudice to restrictions provided for in Article 20(1)(a) and (d) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, requests for access, as well as requests for rectification or objection will be answered in accordance with Section 5 of Council Decision 2004/644/EC (3).

Personal data will be retained for 5 years from the moment the data subject has been removed from the list of persons subject to the asset freeze or the validity of the measure has expired, or for the duration of court proceedings in the event they had been started.

Data subjects may have recourse to the European Data Protection Supervisor in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.

---

(1)  OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1.

(2)  OJ L 117, 8.5.2015, p. 13.

(3)  OJ L 296, 21.9.2004, p. 16.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.7

                                PROMISSORY NOTE

$71,809.80                                                      OCTOBER 15, 2001

     FOR VALUE RECEIVED, and pursuant to Section 10.11 of that certain
Contribution Agreement dated August 9, 2000 entered into by and among
SmartGate, L.C., its members and SmartGate, Inc. ("Agreement"), Samuel S.
Duffey promises to pay to SmartGate, Inc., at 4400 Independence Court,
Sarasota, Florida 34234, the principal sum of Seventy-One Thousand Eight
Hundred Nine and 80/100 ($71,809.80) Dollars, together with interest at 4.59%
(the mid-term Applicable Federal Rate for October 2001), as follows:

     1. Interest payments shall be made annually on each anniversary date of
        the term of this Note, and

     2. Any unpaid interest and the principal shall be paid on the first to
        occur of February 9, 2005, or the sale of Borrower's shares of
        SmartGate, Inc. Common Stock pursuant to Sections 10.7 and 10.11 of the
        Agreement generating net proceeds in sufficient amount to repay this
        Note.

     The borrower may prepay this Note at any time without penalty. This
Promissory Note is made and executed hereunder and is governed by the laws of
the State of Florida.

                                                       /s/ SAMUEL S. DUFFEY
                                                       -------------------------
                                                           Samuel S. Duffey
# C_2018258EN.01000901.xml

| 23.7.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 258/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.7.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 258/9

---

Notice concerning the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2179 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of ceramic tiles originating in the People’s Republic of China: name change of one company subject to the anti-dumping duty rate for cooperating non-sampled companies

(2018/C 258/08)

Guangdong Monalisa Ceramics Co. Ltd, TARIC (1) additional code B179, a company subject to an anti-dumping duty rate of 30,6 % informed the Commission that it had changed its name into Monalisa Group Co., Ltd

1

The company asked the Commission to confirm that the change of name does not affect the right of the company to benefit from the individual duty rate applied to the company under its previous name.

The Commission has examined the information supplied and concluded that the change of name in no way affects the findings of the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2179 (2).

2

Therefore, the reference in the Annex I to the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2179 to:

| ‘Guangdong Monalisa Ceramics Co. Ltd | B179’ |
| --- | --- |

‘Guangdong Monalisa Ceramics Co. Ltd

B179’

Should be read as

| ‘Monalisa Group Co., Ltd | B179’ |
| --- | --- |

‘Monalisa Group Co., Ltd

B179’

The TARIC additional code B179 previously attributed to Guangdong Monalisa Ceramics Co. Ltd applies to Monalisa Group Co., Ltd

---

(1)  The integrated Tariff of the European Union.

1

(2)  OJ L 307, 23.11.2017, p. 25.

2

---
|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                      
|View History:                                                       
|                                                                    
|Ohio Natural Gas Industrial Price  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                    
|                                                                    
|Ohio Natural Gas Industrial Price  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 4.93   | 4.39   | 3.94  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 5.14   | 6.54   | 5.67   | 8.06   | 8.84   | 11.22  | 11.60  | 10.63  | 12.71  | 8.71  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 7.40   | 6.77   | 5.48   | 6.03   | 7.06   | 5.35   | 4.81   | 6.71   | 6.57   | 6.21  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 5.93   | 8.00   | 10.78  | 7.72   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7728
JOHNNY LOUIS WARDLAW, Petitioner - Appellant, versus LLOYD L. WATERS; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. M. J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-96-3042- MJG) Submitted: February 27, 1997 Decided: March 13, 1997 Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Johnny Louis Wardlaw, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Wardlaw v. Waters , No. CA-96- 3042-MJG (D. Md. Oct. 23, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
No. 12-5775.

#### Amr *v.*Crowley et al.

Sup. Ct. Va. Certio-rari denied.
#### Strong v. State

112,540

03/31/2016

Denied.

Unpublished
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 70 (Friday, April 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 17784]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-9430]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution; Notice of Decision on 
Application for Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Instrument

    This decision is made pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, 
Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-
651, 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). Related records can be viewed 
between 8:30 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. in Room 4211, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, 14th and Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C.
    Docket Number: 96-148. Applicant: Woods Hole Oceanographic 
Institution, Woods Hole, MA 02543-1531. Instrument: Mass Spectrometer, 
Model MAT ELEMENT. Manufacturer: Finnigan MAT, Germany. Intended Use: 
See notice at 62 FR 6216, February 11, 1997.
    Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. No instrument of 
equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument, for such 
purposes as it is intended to be used, is being manufactured in the 
United States. Reasons: The foreign instrument provides: (1) A magnetic 
sector analyzer for best sensitivity to study low levels of \230\ Th 
and \231\ Pa in seawater and (2) fastest sample throughput to meet 
laboratory workloads. The National Institutes of Health advises in its 
memorandum dated February 4, 1997 that (1) These capabilities are 
pertinent to the applicant's intended purpose and (2) it knows of no 
domestic instrument or apparatus of equivalent scientific value to the 
foreign instrument for the applicant's intended use.
    We know of no other instrument or apparatus of equivalent 
scientific value to the foreign instrument which is being manufactured 
in the United States.
Frank W. Creel,
Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff.
[FR Doc. 97-9430 Filed 4-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
##### 



For the twelve months ended December 31,
 2007
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003Pretax income from continuing operations beforeMinority Interest
    
    $
    (20,968,257
    )
    
    $
    19,363,144
    
    
    $
    47,346,721
    
    
    $
    21,662,697
    
    
    $
    19,012,550Add: Fixed ChargesInterest Expense
    
    
    134,250
    
    
    
    179,527
    
    
    
    190,870
    
    
    
    206,279
    
    
    
    132,969Interest component of rent expense
    
    
    381,000
    
    
    
    352,986
    
    
    
    364,223
    
    
    
    198,597
    
    
    
    165,600Amortization of Capitalized Interest
    
    
    6,978,878
    
    
    
    8,787,519
    
    
    
    4,781,856
    
    
    
    3,047,801
    
    
    
    2,487,729Earnings as defined
    
    $
    (13,474,129
    )
    
    $
    28,683,176
    
    
    $
    52,683,670
    
    
    $
    25,115,374
    
    
    $
    21,798,848Fixed Charges:Interest expense
    
    $
    134,250
    
    
    $
    179,527
    
    
    $
    190,870
    
    
    $
    206,279
    
    
    $
    132,969Interest component of rent expense
    
    
    381,000
    
    
    
    352,986
    
    
    
    364,223
    
    
    
    198,597
    
    
    
    165,600Capitalized Interest
    
    
    19,902,207
    
    
    
    19,106,562
    
    
    
    12,485,232
    
    
    
    4,884,680
    
    
    
    2,065,526Fixed Charges
    
    $
    20,417,457
    
    
    $
    19,639,075
    
    
    $
    13,040,325
    
    
    $
    5,289,556
    
    
    $
    2,364,095Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1.46
    
    
    
    4.04
    
    
    
    4.75
    
    
    
    9.22Deficiency of Earnings to Fixed Charges
    
    $
    33,891,586
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
Faulk, Scott (OST) '?M.m or 

:SMORiAT!ON 

- OFERATiOi-^S 

^Q: 18 

From: ADAM SMITHOLUM <smitholum@gmail.com> 

Sent: Monday, April 02, 2012 8:26 PM 

To: Faulk, Scott (OST) 

Subject: essential air service 

Dear Mr FaulkWe are writing in regards to the essential air service that allows us to live in the Alaskan bush town of Chisana. We 

recently moved here full time and rely on the mail plane for transport back and forth to Tok as we do not own our own 

air plane. We also get most things delivered by mail plane including groceries from 3 Bears in Tok, hardware supplies 

from the store in Tok, gas, diesel & propane, really anything that fits on the mail plane we stick on it including our 3 clogs 

and 2 cats! We would not be able to live here without that connection to society as well as never having anyone visit us! 

Please consider renewing the service so that we can continue to live in the 21st century and not be forced back into the 

previous century - my Netflix movies rely on regular mail service! Thank you for your time. 

Sincerely -

Adam & Samantha Smitholum 

PO Box CZN 

Tok, AK 99780 

907-734-0000
# m94_50
##### 



(a)
    
    the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Global Traffic Network, Inc. for the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and(b)
    
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Global
Traffic Network, Inc.
 Dated: September 24, 2007
    By:
    /s/ William L. Yde IIIWilliam L. Yde III, Chief Executive Officerand President (Principal Executive Officer)Dated: September 24, 2007
    By:
    /s/ Scott E. CodyScott E. Cody, Chief Financial Officerand Chief Operating Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)