alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2019232EN.01001001.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 10.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 232/10 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9442 — Elliott/Insight/WorkForce)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 232/09)

1.

On 3 July 2019, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2019232EN.01001001-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Elliott Associates, L.P., Elliott International L.P. and Evergreen Coast Capital Corp., controlled by Elliott Management Corporation (together ‘Elliott Group’, U.S.), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Insight Venture Management, LLC (‘Insight Group’, U.S.), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | WorkForce Software, LLC (‘WorkForce’, U.S.). |

Elliott Group and Insight Group acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control over the whole of WorkForce.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for Elliot Group: global investment firm focussed on investment and risk management activities,

—   for Insight Group: global venture capital and private equity firm investing in highgrowth technology and software companies,

—   for WorkForce: provider of cloud workforce management solutions to enterprise and mid-sized organisations.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2019232EN.01001001-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9442 — Elliott/Insight/WorkForce

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2019232EN.01001001-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2019232EN.01001001-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
302 CERTIFICATION

I, Maria Camila Maz, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed the annual report on Form 10-KSB of Dulcin
Izmir Corporation;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;

         4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
12a-14) and internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and
have:
      a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is
being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing
date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

      c)  presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

         5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

         a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which
are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.

Date: December 11, 2006            /s/Maria Camila Maz
                                   ----------------------------
                                   Maria Camila Maz
                                   Chief Executive Officer
                                   Chief Financial Officer
No. 12-6009.

#### Washington *v.*Illinois.

Sup. Ct. Ill. Certio-rari denied.
|                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                    
|View History:                                                     
|                                                                  
|Tennessee Natural Gas Industrial Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                  
|                                                                  
|Tennessee Natural Gas Industrial Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |         | 138,863 | 144,560 | 144,542
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 129,716 | 118,566 | 118,241 | 112,446 | 98,701  | 94,898  | 93,600  | 91,923  | 91,835  | 83,315 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 94,320  | 106,522 | 105,046 | 110,475 | 116,882 | 114,682 | 122,953 | 134,555 | 146,889 | 147,959
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 145,855 | 153,566 | 152,133 | 145,970 |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-60530

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CHRISTOPHER RAGINS, also known as Turk,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:04-CV-43

USDC No. 1:00-CR-139-9

Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Christopher Ragins, federal prisoner # 11321-042, was convicted by a jury

of conspiracy to distribute and to possess with intentto distribute approximately

169.44 grams of cocaine base (Count One), distribution of approximately 7.21

grams of cocaine base (Count Nine), possession of 105.69 grams of cocaine base

with intent to distribute (Count 20), and possession of 3269.6 grams of

marijuana with intent to distribute (Count 21). Ragins is serving concurrent

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

December 20, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 06-60530

2

480-month prison sentences as to the cocaine-base convictions and a concurrent

60-month term as to the marijuana conviction. He filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2255

motion challenging his conviction and sentence.

Following the district court’s denial of Ragins’s § 2255 motion, this court

granted Ragins a certificate of appealability with regard to whether trial counsel

performed ineffectively by failing to interview and call as trial witnesses, Lewis

Ragins, Ricardo Miller, and Jimmy Taylor, who allegedly could have testified

that Ragins was not involved in the conduct for which he was convicted. The

parties were advised to address whether Ragins was entitled to an evidentiary

hearing as to this claim. 

When reviewing the denial of habeas relief, the district court’s findings of

fact are reviewed for clear error and issues of law are reviewed de novo. United

States v. Faubion, 19 F.3d 226, 228 (5th Cir. 1994). We review mixed questions

of law and fact, such as ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims, de novo. Id.

Ragins has not shown that there was a reasonable probability that the

outcome of his trial would have been different if these witnesses had testified

and, therefore, he has not shown that his trial counsel rendered ineffective

assistance. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 694, 694 (1984); Miller

v. Dretke, 420 F.3d 356, 361 (5th Cir. 2005); Alexander v. McCotter, 775 F.2d 595,

602 (5th Cir. 1985). Nor was Ragins entitled to an evidentiary hearing on this

issue. See United States v. Drummond, 910 F.2d 284, 285 (5th Cir. 1990). The

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
#### State v. Lobmeyer

110,209

07/27/2015

Denied

Unpublished
#### State v. Mitchell

111,678

09/23/2015

Denied

Unpublished
**EXHIBIT 21.1**

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES 

ARM GP Holdings, Inc. 

Alliance Resource Management GP, LLC 

Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. 

Alliance Resource Operating Partners, L.P. 

Alliance Coal, LLC 

Alliance Design Group,LLC 

Alliance Land, LLC 

Alliance Properties, LLC 

Alliance Resource Properties, LLC 

Alliance Service, Inc. 

Backbone Mountain,LLC 

Excel Mining, LLC 

GibsonCounty Coal, LLC 

Gibson County Coal (South), LLC 

Hopkins County Coal, LLC 

MC Mining, LLC 

Mettiki Coal, LLC 

Mettiki Coal (WV), LLC

Mt. Vernon Transfer Terminal, LLC 

Penn Ridge Coal, LLC 

Pontiki Coal, LLC 

River View Coal, LLC 

Tunnel Ridge, LLC 

Warrior Coal, LLC 

Webster County Coal, LLC

White County Coal, LLC 

MatrixDesign Group, LLC 

All of the above entities are formed or incorporated, as the case may be, under the laws of the State of Delaware.
No. 12-127.

#### Palivoda *v.*Felix et al.

Ct. App. Ohio, Ash-tabula County. Certiorari denied.
# C_2019088EN.01000101.xml

| 7.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 88/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 88/1

---

Agreement on the European Economic Area, Chapter V (4) of Annex II, Section 6 (b) of Protocol 1 on horizontal adaptations

Types of gas and the corresponding supply pressures according to Article 4(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/426 of the European Parliament and of the Council on appliances burning gaseous fuels and repealing Directive 2009/142/EC

(This publication is based on information received by the Commission from Norway)

(2019/C 88/01)

NORWAY

| Gas Family | 2nd Family | 3rd Family |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Gas Group | Group H | Group B/P |
| | minimum | maximum | minimum | maximum |
| Gross Calorific Value (GCV) [MJ/m3] | — | — | — | — |
| Wobbe index [MJ/m3] | 48,3 | 52,8 | 81,7 (commercial)
  (min 73,735) | 92,7 (commercial)
  (max 80,45) |
| Gas composition by volume in % of the total content: |
| | minimum | maximum | minimum | maximum |
| C1 Methane | 75 | 95 | | 0,1 |
| C2 Ethane | 5 | 10 | | 2 |
| C3 Propane (1) | 0 | 4 | 95 | 98 |
| C4 Butane (2) | 0 | 2 | — | 5 |
| C5 1,3 Butadiene | | | | 0,09 weight % |
| N2 + CO2 content | | traces |
| CO content | | traces |
| Unsaturated HC content (3) | | | — | 1 mol % |
| Hydrogen content | | traces |
| Information on toxic components contained in the gaseous fuel: |
| | not known | not known |
| Supply pressure: |
| | minimum | nominal | maximum | minimum | nominal | maximum |
| Supply pressure at the inlet of appliances [mbar] | 17 | 20 | 25 | 25 | 30 | 37 |
| Reference conditions for Wobbe index and Gross Calorific Value (GCV) |
| Combustion reference temperature [°C] | 15 °C | 0 °C |
| Volume measurement reference temperature [°C] | 15 °C | 0 °C |
| Volume measurement reference pressure [mbar] | 1,013 bar |

Gas Family

2nd Family

3rd Family

Gas Group

Group H

Group B/P

minimum

maximum

minimum

maximum

Gross Calorific Value (GCV) [MJ/m3]

—

—

—

—

Wobbe index [MJ/m3]

48,3

52,8

81,7 (commercial)

(min 73,735)

92,7 (commercial)

(max 80,45)

Gas composition by volume in % of the total content:

minimum

maximum

minimum

maximum

C1 Methane

75

95

0,1

C2 Ethane

5

10

2

C3 Propane (1)

0

4

95

98

C4 Butane (2)

0

2

—

5

C5 1,3 Butadiene

0,09 weight %

N2 + CO2 content

traces

CO content

traces

Unsaturated HC content (3)

—

1 mol %

Hydrogen content

traces

Information on toxic components contained in the gaseous fuel:

not known

not known

Supply pressure:

minimum

nominal

maximum

minimum

nominal

maximum

Supply pressure at the inlet of appliances [mbar]

17

20

25

25

30

37

Reference conditions for Wobbe index and Gross Calorific Value (GCV)

Combustion reference temperature [°C]

15 °C

0 °C

Volume measurement reference temperature [°C]

15 °C

0 °C

Volume measurement reference pressure [mbar]

1,013 bar

---

(1)  Commercial Propane.

(2)  Commercial Butane.

(3)  EN 589 refers to max 0,5 mol % for total Dienes content.

---
# C_2021232EN.01007701.xml

| 16.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 232/77 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 232/77

---

P9_TA(2019)0065

Nomination of a member of the Court of Auditors — Klaus-Heiner Lehne

European Parliament decision of 26 November 2019 on the nomination of Klaus-Heiner Lehne as a Member of the Court of Auditors (C9-0124/2019 — 2019/0811(NLE))

(Consultation)

(2021/C 232/20)

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to Article 286(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C9-0124/2019), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 286(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C9-0124/2019),

| — | having regard to Rule 129 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 129 of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A9-0029/2019), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A9-0029/2019),

| A. | whereas Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control proceeded to evaluate the credentials of the nominee, in particular in view of the requirements laid down in Article 286(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

A.

whereas Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control proceeded to evaluate the credentials of the nominee, in particular in view of the requirements laid down in Article 286(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union;

| B. | whereas at its meeting of 12 November 2019 the Committee on Budgetary Control heard the Council’s nominee for membership of the Court of Auditors; |
| --- | --- |

B.

whereas at its meeting of 12 November 2019 the Committee on Budgetary Control heard the Council’s nominee for membership of the Court of Auditors;

| 1. | Delivers a favourable opinion on the Council’s nomination of Klaus-Heiner Lehne as a Member of the Court of Auditors; |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and, for information, to the Court of Auditors, the other institutions of the European Union and the audit institutions of the Member States. |
| --- | --- |

2.

---
#### State v. Alvarado

108,458

09/14/2015

Denied.

Unpublished
#### COM. v. SANDERS, J.

19 MDA 2017

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/06/2017

CP-67-CR-0002003-2015 (York)

Affirmed — Application to Withdraw as Counsel Granted
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 73 (Wednesday, April 16, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 18640]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-9743]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Notice of Establishment

    Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 
U.S.C., Appendix 2), the Director, National Institutes of Health (NIH), 
announces the establishment of the Advisory Committee on Research on 
Minority Health.
    This Board will advise the Director, NIH, and the Director, Office 
of Research on Minority Health, as to appropriate activities, including 
those to be undertaken by the national research institutes, with 
respect to research related to minority health; the inclusion of 
members of minority groups as subjects in clinical research; and the 
enhancement of minority participation in research and research training 
programs.
    Unless renewed by appropriate action prior to its expiration, the 
charter for the Advisory Committee on Research on Minority Health will 
expire two years from the date of establishment.

    Dated: April 9, 1997.
Harold Varmus,
Director, National Institutes of Health.
[FR Doc. 97-9743 Filed 4-15-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### State v. Rush

106,144

08/29/13

Denied.

Unpublished
#### Nathan Jerrome JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-0995

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed August 3, 2017

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Walton County. Kelvin C. Wells, Judge.

AFFIRMED."
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2019070EN.01001201.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 25.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 70/12 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9076 — Novelis/Aleris)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 70/08)

1.

On 18 February 2019, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2019070EN.01001201-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Novelis Inc. (USA, ‘Novelis’), a subsidiary of Hindalco Industries Limited (India), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Aleris Corporation (USA, ‘Aleris’). |

Novelis acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Aleris.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Novelis is a global manufacturer of semi-finished aluminium products and recycler of aluminium, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Aleris is a global manufacturer of semi-finished aluminium products. |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9076 — Novelis/Aleris

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2019070EN.01001201-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

---
GLOBAL TRAFFIC NETWORK
^-^EScyKy THIS CERTIFICATE IS TRANSFERABLE IN SOUTH ST. PAUL, MN
SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONSCUS1P37947B103FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE
COMMON SHARES, $.001 PAR VALUE, OF GLOBAL TRAFFIC NETWORK, INC.transferable on the books of
the Corporation byJjfh^hflS^h^e^iif^effoffor^byAt^rney upon surrender of this certificate properly
endorsed. This certificate is not valid unless^cqu/Afsfn^ib^lAfTransfef Agent and Registrar. IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Corporation has caused this certificate to be signed by facsimile
signatures of its duly authorized officers. Dated:
o 2
Cf <SxU- o >
H O 33 rnSECRETARY
CHIEF OFFICER




---



##### 



The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be
construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: TEN
COM  as tenants in common TEN ENT   as tenants by entireties UTMA  -
Custodia /r ..  (Gust) (Minor) under Uniform Transfer to Minors JT TEN
- as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common Additional
abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. (State) Act PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL
SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS
INCLUDING POSTAL ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEEa/iwao- /t&reou
^ constitute* anw afyko-i/ifrto-
on/SIGNATURE GUARANTEED ALL GUARANTEES MUST BE .MADE BY A FINANCIAL INSTITUTION (SUCH AS A BANK OR
BROKER) WHICH.IS A PARTICIPANT IN THE SECURITIES TRANSFER AGENTS MEDALLION PROGRAM (STAMP), THE
NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE, INC. MEDALLION SIGNATURE PROGRAM (MSP). OR THE STOCK EXCHANGES MEDALLION
PROGRAM (SEMP) AND MUST NOT BE DATED. GUARANTEES BY. A NOTARY PUBLIC ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE. i/i/
NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF
THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.
#### State v. Jester

111,058

111,059

08/20/2015

Denied

Unpublished