alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                            
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                              
|View History:                                                                               
|                                                                                            
|No chart available.                                                                         
|No chart available.                                                                         
|                                                                                            
|                                                                                            
|Hawaii Natural Gas Price Sold to Electric Power Consumers  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        | --     | --     | --     | --     | --     | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     | --     | --     | --     | --     | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
No. 12-6255.

#### Meeks *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Order filed April 24, 2014.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 12

- 00466

- CR

____________ WILLIAM TYRONE WASHI NGTON , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 262nd District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1345408



### ORDER

The clerk’s record was filed July 5, 2012 . Our review has determined that a
relevant item has been omitted from the clerk’ s record. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c). The record does not contain a certified bill of costs.
The Harris County District Clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record on or before May 22 , 2014, containing a certified bill of costs.

PER CURIAM
## MA**TERIA LS NOT INCLUDED IN** 

**AI RWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (A**  **D) DOCKET**

**FAA -**  **20 13**  **- 0454**  Docket Number
**20 09**  **- SW**  **- 081**  **- AD**  Directorate Identifier Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket Erickson Serv ice Bulletin No. 64B10 - 3, Revision D, dated October 15, 2007 .


### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region Rules Docket 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663 Fort W orth, Texas 76137 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
No. 12-5807.

#### Cherer *v.*Frazier et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


          In  connection  with the Annual Report of Watermark  Investors  Realty
Trust (the  "Company")  on Form 10-K for the year  ending  December  31, 2006 as
filed with the  Securities and Exchange  Commission  (the "SEC") on or about the
date hereof (the "Report"),  I, David S. Givner,  Principal Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

          A signed  original of this written  statement has been provided to the
Company and will be retained  by the  Company  and  furnished  to the SEC or its
staff upon request.

 Date: March 27, 2007                       /s/ David S. Givner
                                            ---------------------------
                                            David S. Givner
                                            Principal Financial Officer
Order filed, July 19, 2013

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________
NO. 14

- 13

- 00440

- CV

____________
ANITA LAVEN , Appellant

V.

THBN, LLC AND SEAN A RNOLD, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TRUSTEE OF THE ANITA R. LAVE N 20334 DESERT WILLO W LAND TRUS T , Appellee

On Appeal from the 55th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2011

- 53982



### ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due July 05, 2013

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not
been filed timely, we issue the following order.We order Gina Wilburn , the official court reporter, to file the record in this

appeal within 30 da ys of the date of this order

.
PER CURIAM
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20 - 0604 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. PRESTON CSOO ROSSBACH,

Defendant and Appellant.

**O RDER**  Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including December 30 , 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 23 2022

11/23/2022

Case Number: DA 20-0604
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 410 

Supporting and recognizing the goals and ideals of ‘‘RV Centennial Celebration Month’’ to commemorate 100 years of enjoyment of recreation 

vehicles in the United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 4, 2010 

Mr. BAYH (for himself and Mr. LUGAR) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting and recognizing the goals and ideals of ‘‘RV 

Centennial Celebration Month’’ to commemorate 100 

years of enjoyment of recreation vehicles in the United 

States. 

Whereas 1910 marks the first year of mass-produced, manufactured, motorized campers and camping trailers; 

Whereas 1 in 12 households in the United States own a 

recreation vehicle (referred to in this preamble as an 

‘‘RV’’), and over 30,000,000 RV enthusiasts take part in 

this affordable and environmentally friendly form of vacationing; 

Whereas RV vacations allow families in the United States to 

build stronger relationships, explore the great outdoors, 

and take part in healthy activities; 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 410 IS 

Whereas this homegrown industry, including RV manufacturers, suppliers, dealers, and campgrounds, employs hundreds of thousands of people in good-paying jobs across 

all 50 States; 

Whereas traveling in an RV offers the freedom, comfort, and 

flexibility to see all parts of the United States, from historic landmarks and National Parks to local campgrounds and sporting events; and 

Whereas the 100th anniversary of the introduction of the RV 

into the marketplace in the United States will be celebrated June 7, 2010, at the RV/MH Hall of Fame in 

Elkhart, Indiana: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) supports and recognizes the goals and ideals 

3 of ‘‘RV Centennial Celebration Month’’ to com4 memorate 100 years of enjoyment of recreation vehi5 cles in the United States; and 

6 (2) encourages the people of the United States 

7 to celebrate this anniversary by taking part in recre8 ation vehicle vacations. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

LINDA S. RESTREPO AND CARLOS E. RESTREPO d/b/a COLLECTIVELY RDI GLOBAL SERVICES AND R & D INTERNATIONAL
, Appellant s ,

v.

ALLIANCE RIGGERS & CONSTRUCTORS, LTD.
, Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 13

- 00 007

- C V

Appeal from the
County Court at Law No. 5

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2012

- DCV0 4523 )

MEMORANDUM OPINION
This appeal is before us on our own motion to determine if it should be dism issed for want
of jurisdiction. Because there is no appealable order, we dismiss the appeal for want of
jurisdiction.
Appellants, Linda S. Restrepo and Carlo s E. Restrepo d/b/a Collectively RDI Global
Services and R & D International, are attempting to appeal from an order denying their motion to
dismiss the underlying suit for want of prosecution. On February 6, 2013, the Clerk of the Court
notified Appellan ts that this order was not an appealable order and notified them of the Court’s
intent to dismiss for want of jurisdiction unless, within ten days of the notice, a party responded
showing grounds to continue the appeal. No response has been filed.2

It is w ell settled that appellate courts have jurisdiction over final judgments, and such
interlocutory orders as the Legislature deems appealable by statute. Lehmann v. Har

- Con Corp.
, 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001); Ruiz v. Ruiz , 946 S.W.2d 123, 124 (Tex.App.

-- El Paso 1997, no
pet.); T EX .C IV .P RAC .&R EM .C ODE A NN . § 51.014 (West Supp. 2012) (authorizing appeals from
certain interlocutory orders). An order denying a motion to dismiss a cause of action for want of
prosecution is not a final judgment ; it is an interlo cutory order

. See De Ayala v. Mackie , 193

S.W.3d 575, 578 (Tex. 2006)( concluding that an order denying a motion to dismiss an entire
proceeding for want of subject

- matter jurisdiction is not a final judgment because it does not
dispose of a claim that, if asserted independently, would be t he proper subject of a lawsuit ).
Further, there is no statutory provision authorizing an appeal from the denial of a motion to dismiss
for want of prosecution. Accordingly, the order at issue here is not appealable

. W e therefore
dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See T EX .R.A PP

. P. 42.3(a).

March 13, 2013 YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice
Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 22-0019

_________________

STATE OF MONTANA,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

 v.

SACRAMENTO JUAN DOMINGUEZ, JR.,

 Defendant and Appellant.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable Yvonne Laird, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 31 2024

07/31/2024

Case Number: DA 22-0019
Manufacturing Flow Sheet ( CBI )PMN P.9 PMN P.9aSectionA-2 SectionA-3ExposureRelease &Disposal 

# TS-S081UY 

# Attachment 4

Pa g e 1/1CBI
#### State v. Stewart

112,922

08/31/2016

Denied.

Unpublished
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 523 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 523

  Honoring the crew members who perished aboard the offshore oil rig, 
 Deepwater Horizon, and extending the condolences of the Senate to the 
         families and loved ones of the deceased crew members.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 12, 2010

  Ms. Landrieu (for herself, Mr. Wicker, Mr. Shelby, Mr. Vitter, Mrs. 
  Hutchison, Mr. Cochran, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Sessions, Mr. Bingaman, Ms. 
     Murkowski, and Mr. Nelson of Florida) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Honoring the crew members who perished aboard the offshore oil rig, 
 Deepwater Horizon, and extending the condolences of the Senate to the 
         families and loved ones of the deceased crew members.

Whereas oil and natural gas are necessary commodities for the United States;
Whereas a drill ship, the Deepwater Horizon, was drilling in 5,000 feet of water 
        approximately 50 miles off the coast of Louisiana, in the Gulf of 
        Mexico;
Whereas on April 20, 2010, a terrible explosion occurred aboard the Deepwater 
        Horizon;
Whereas 126 men and women were on board the Deepwater Horizon at the time of the 
        explosion;
Whereas 11 men remain missing, and are presumed dead;
Whereas 17 people were injured, 3 of them critically; and
Whereas the United States is greatly indebted to oil rig crewmen for the serious 
        physical risks, difficult periods of separation from their families, and 
        supremely challenging engineering tasks endured to produce much-needed 
        energy for the Nation: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) honors the crew members who perished aboard the 
        offshore oil rig, Deepwater Horizon; and
            (2) expresses sincere condolences to the families and loved 
        ones of the deceased crew members.
                                 <all>
```
#### State v. Dimmick

106,352

08/19/13

Denied. ...

Unpublished
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.6
                                PROMISSORY NOTE
$74,384.20                                                      OCTOBER 15, 2001

     FOR VALUE RECEIVED, and pursuant to Section 10.11 of that certain
Contribution Agreement dated August 9, 2000 entered into by and among
SmartGate, L.C., its members and SmartGate, Inc. ("Agreement"), Stephen A.
Michael promises to pay to SmartGate, Inc., at 4400 Independence Court,
Sarasota, Florida 34234, the principal sum of Seventy-Four Thousand Three
Hundred Eighty Four and 20/100 ($74,384.20) Dollars, together with interest at
4.59% (the mid-term Applicable Federal Rate for October 2001), as follows:

     1. Interest payments shall be made annually on each anniversary date of the
        term of this Note, and

     2. Any unpaid interest and the principal shall be paid on the first to
        occur of February 9, 2005, or the sale of Borrower's shares of
        SmartGate, Inc. Common Stock pursuant to Sections 10.7 and 10.11 of the
        Agreement generating net proceeds in sufficient amount to repay this
        Note.

     The Borrower may prepay this Note at any time without penalty. This
Promissory Note is made and executed hereunder and is governed by the laws of
the State of Florida.



                                                         /s/ STEPHEN A. MICHAEL
                                                         -----------------------
                                                              Stephen A. Michael
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 600 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 600

 To authorize document production and testimony by, and representation 
               of, the Select Committee on Intelligence.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 28, 2010

   Mr. Reid (for himself and Mr. McConnell) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 To authorize document production and testimony by, and representation 
               of, the Select Committee on Intelligence.

Whereas, the United States Department of Justice has requested that the Senate 
        Select Committee on Intelligence provide it with documents in connection 
        with a pending investigation into the unauthorized disclosure of 
        classified national security information;
Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the Ethics in Government 
        Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. Sec. Sec. 288b(a) and 288c(a)(2), the Senate may 
        direct its counsel to represent former or current employees of the 
        Senate with respect to any subpoena, order, or request for testimony 
        relating to their official responsibilities;
Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States and Rule XI of the 
        Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the 
        possession of the Senate may, by the judicial or administrative process, 
        be taken from such control or possession but by permission of the 
        Senate;
Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or in the possession of 
        the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will 
        take such action as will promote the ends of justice consistent with the 
        privileges of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Senate Select 
Committee on Intelligence, acting jointly, are authorized to provide to 
the United States Department of Justice, under appropriate security 
procedures, copies of Committee documents sought in connection with a 
pending investigation into the unauthorized disclosure of classified 
national security information, and former and current employees of the 
Committee are authorized to testify in proceedings arising out of that 
investigation, except concerning matters for which a privilege should 
be asserted.
    Sec. 2.  The Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to represent the 
Select Committee on Intelligence, and any former or current employee of 
the Committee from whom testimony may be required, in connection with 
the testimony and document production authorized in section one of this 
resolution.
                                 <all>
```
#### State v. Fry

109,952

09/23/2015

Denied

Unpublished
Exhibit 32(c)

Certification of the CEO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*

This
certification is provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and accompanies the Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K (the Form 10-K/A)
for the year ended January 3, 2010 of Tim Hortons Inc. (the Issuer).

I, Donald B. Schroeder, the Chief Executive Officer of
the Issuer certify that, to the best of my knowledge:

(i) the Form 10-K/A fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

(ii) the information contained in the Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.

Dated: March 31, 2010



/s/ DONALD B. SCHROEDERName: Donald B. Schroeder




|* | This certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates this certification therein by reference.
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------