alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.2

                                  [CHASE LOGO]

                         ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Pursuant to the servicing agreement, the undersigned Officer, to the best of
his/her knowledge, hereby certifies to the following:

I have reviewed the activities and performance of the Servicer and, during the
preceding fiscal year under the terms of the Servicing Agreement, Trust
Agreement, Pooling and Servicing Agreement and/or Seller/Servicer Guide and to
the best of the Officer's knowledge, the Servicer has fulfilled all its duties,
responsibilities or obligations under these Agreements throughout such year.

      a)    All property inspections have been completed.

      b)    Compliance relative to Adjustable Rate Mortgages has been met.

      c)    Compliance with IRS Foreclosure reporting regulations enacted as IRS
            Section 6060J by the Deficit Reduction Act, regarding Acquired
            and/or Abandonment property have been completed.

      d)    All loans serviced in states that have statutes requiring payment of
            interest on escrow/impound accounts have been completed.

      e)    That such Officer has confirmed that the Fidelity Bond, the Errors
            and Omissions Insurance Policy and any other bonds required under
            the terms of the Servicing Agreement are in full force and effect.

      f)    Enclosed is a copy of our most recent independent audit statement.


CERTIFIED BY:   /s/ Kim Greaves                             Date: March 13, 2006
                ----------------------                            --------------
                Kim Greaves
                Senior Vice President
                Chase Home Finance LLC


                /s/ Jim Miller                              Date: March 13, 2006
                -----------------------                           --------------
                Jim Miller
                Senior Vice President
                Chase Home Finance LLC


<PAGE>

SEE EXHIBIT 99.1 FOR MOST RECENT INDEPENDENT AUDIT STATEMENT
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<MULTIPLIER>        1000
       
<S>                           <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             Mar-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                Apr-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  Sep-30-1997
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<CASH>                        4688
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 67315
<ALLOWANCES>                  3350
<INVENTORY>                   41362
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              117171
<PP&E>                        82852
<DEPRECIATION>                43109
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                280261
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         72051
<BONDS>                       114494
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0   
<PREFERRED>                   0
<COMMON>                      13088
<OTHER-SE>                    75997
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  280261
<SALES>                       149723
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              149723
<CGS>                         71321
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 126240
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              54919
<LOSS-PROVISION>              442
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            3450
<INCOME-PRETAX>               23483
<INCOME-TAX>                  8571
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           14603
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  14603
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 1.72
<EPS-DILUTED>                 1.72



</TABLE>
#### Shelton v. Jay Hatfield Mobility

106,394

12/27/13

Denied

Unpublished
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 69 (Thursday, April 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17612-17613]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-9292]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-312-000]


Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation; Notice of Proposed 
Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

April 4, 1997.
    Take notice on April 1, 1997, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line 
Corporation (Transco) tendered for filing certain tariff sheets to its 
FERC Gas Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1, which tariff sheets are 
enumerated in Appendix A attached to the filing.
    Transco states that the purpose of the filing is to implement a gas 
parking and borrowing service under Rate Schedule PBS. Service under 
Rate Schedule PBS will enable Transco to accommodate the needs of the 
marketplace in a manner not currently available under its existing 
tariff by providing shippers with enhanced flexibility to manage their 
gas supplies.
    Transco states that it is serving copies of the instant filing to 
customers, State Commissions and other interested parties.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, Washington, D.C. 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests should be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Any person wishing to

[[Page 17613]]

become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-9292 Filed 4-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 71 (Monday, April 14, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18141-18142]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-9472]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Geological Survey


Request for Public Comments on Proposed Information Collection 
Submitted to the Office of Management and Budget for Review Under the 
Paperwork Reduction Act

    The proposed information collection described below has been 
submitted to the Office of Management and Budget for approval under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 
3506(c)(2)). Copies of the proposed collection may be obtained by 
contacting the Bureau's clearance officer at the phone number listed 
below. Public comments on the proposal should be made within 30 days 
directly

[[Page 18142]]

to: Desk Officer for the Interior Department, Office of Information and 
Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC 
20503; and the Bureau Clearance Officer, U.S. Geological Survey, 208 
National Center, Reston, VA 20192.
    As required by OMB regulations at 5 CFR 1320.8(d)(1), the U.S. 
Geological Survey solicits specific public comments as to:
    1. Whether the collection of information is necessary for the 
proper performance of the functions on the bureaus, including whether 
the information will have practical utility;
    2. The accuracy of the bureau's estimate of the burden of the 
collection of information, including the validity of the methodology 
and assumptions used:
    3. The quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be 
collected; and
    4. How to minimize the burden of the collection of information on 
those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated, 
electronic, mechanical, or other forms of information technology.
    Title: National Mapping Division Data Grant Program for Land 
Processes Research.
    OMB approval number: 1028-0052.
    Abstract: Respondents supply information and awardees supply a 
final report. Application information identifies the land processes 
research project and remotely sensed data requirements. Final report 
identifies utility of Data Grant Program in the completion of the 
nonprofit institution's research project.
    Bureau form number: None.
    Frequency: Annually.
    Description respondents: Non-profit institutions.
    Estimated completion time: 25 hours.
    Annual responses: 520.
    Annual burden hours: 13,000 hours.
    Bureau clearance officer: John Cordyack, 703-648-7313.

    Dated: February 5, 1997.
John N. Fischer,
Acting Associate Chief, Operations
[FR Doc. 97-9472 Filed 4-11-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-31-M
#### Maria SOTO, Appellant, v. POLK COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, and Johns Eastern Company, Inc., Appellees.

CASE NO. 1D16-4613

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed August 8, 2017

An appeal from an order of Judge of Compensation Claims. Margaret E. Sojourner, Judge.

Date of Accident: September 19, 2011.

AFFIRMED.
C O U R T O F A P P E A LS EI GHTH D I STRI CT OF TEX AS ELPASO, TEXAS

RI CK MENDOZ A and I RENE MENDOZ A, Ap pe lla nts , v. AL I CI A G. MURPHY, M.D. and MARI ANO AL L EN, M.D., Appellee s. § § § § § § No . 0 8- 08 -0 02 79 -C V

Appea l from 327th District Court of El Paso County , Texas (TC # 2005-1644)

M EM OR

AN DU M OP IN ION Pe nd ingbe fo re the Court is A pp e lla nts ’ m oti on to di sm iss th e a pp e a l pu rs ua nt t o T EX .R.A PP .P. 42.1(a)( 1). Appellee s have not obje cted to the dismiss al and ther e is no indication that dismiss al would prevent Appellee s from seeking relief to which they would otherwise be entitled. We theref

ore g rant the motion and dismiss the appea l. Costs are t ax ed aga inst Appellants. See T EX .R.A PP .P. 42.1(d). April 9, 2009 ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, J ustice B e f o r e C h e w , C

. J. , M c C l u r e , a n d R i v e r a , JJ. Chew, C.J ., not participating
173A16

#### State v. Morris Leavett Stith

1. Defs Motion to Extend Time to File Brief

2. Defs Motion to Deem Brief Timely Filed .

1. Allowed

2. Allowed
----

**Exhibit 23.2**

**Consent of John Drobe**
Reference is made to the: 

Panantza & San Carlos Project PreliminaryAssessment Report, dated October 30, 2007 and titled "PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENTREPORT, PANANTZA & SAN CARLOS COPPER PROJECT, Morona – Santiago, Ecuador"; and

Mirador Project Feasibility Study Report,dated April 23, 2008 and titled "MIRADOR COPPER-GOLD PROJECT, 30,000 TPDFEASIBILITY STUDY, Zamora-Chinchipe Province Ecuador" 

(collectively, the "Technical Reports"). 

The undersigned hereby consents to referencesto its name and references to and excerpts from the Technical Reports in theAnnual Report on Form 40-F of Corriente Resources Inc. to be filed with theUnited States Securities and Exchange Commission for the company’s 2009 FiscalYear. 

Dated this 15th day of March 2010. 

 /s/ John Drobe, P.Geo.                John Drobe, P.Geo.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARIA DEL CARMEN ESPINO-LOPEZ,

Petitioner,

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney 

General,

Respondent.

No. 21-217

Agency No.

A205-270-468

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 20, 2024**

San Francisco, California

Before: OWENS and BADE, Circuit Judges, and BAKER, Judge.

***

Maria Del Carmen Espino-Lopez, a citizen of Mexico, petitions for review 

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) order dismissing her appeal from an 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

*** The Honorable M. Miller Baker, Judge for the United States Court of 

International Trade, sitting by designation.

FILED

JUN 24 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 21-217

Immigration Judge’s order denying her application for cancellation of removal. 

We have jurisdiction to consider “questions of law.” 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(D). 

We review questions of law de novo, Coronado v. Holder, 759 F.3d 977, 982 (9th 

Cir. 2014), and we deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not err when it determined that Espino-Lopez’s conviction for 

solicitation to commit forgery under Arizona Revised Statutes §§ 13-1002(A) 

(solicitation) and 13-2002(A)(2) (forgery) was categorically a crime involving 

moral turpitude (CIMT) that rendered her ineligible for cancellation of removal. 

An alien is ineligible for cancellation of removal if she has been convicted of a 

CIMT. See 8 U.S.C. §§ 1182(a)(2)(A)(i)(I), 1229b(b)(1)(C). When an alien has 

been convicted for a solicitation offense, we look at the underlying crime to 

determine if the offense constitutes a CIMT. Barragan-Lopez v. Mukasey, 508

F.3d 899, 903 (9th Cir. 2007) (explaining that when the conviction for solicitation 

is not for “unspecified criminal conduct,” the court considers the “underlying 

crime[] in determining whether convictions for inchoate offenses constitute crimes 

involving moral turpitude”). Here, the underlying conviction was under section 

13-2002(A), which is “per se” a CIMT “[b]ecause . . . [it] requires intent to 

defraud.” Espino-Castillo v. Holder, 770 F.3d 861, 864 (9th Cir. 2014). Thus, 

Espino-Lopez was ineligible for cancellation of removal, and the BIA did not err.

PETITION DENIED.
#### State v. Krahmer

112,032

03/31/2016

Denied.

Unpublished
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 72 (Tuesday, April 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 18353]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-9635]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission to OMB Under 
Delegated Authority

Background

    Notice is hereby given of the final approval of a proposed 
information collection by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System (Board) under OMB delegated authority, as per 5 CFR 1320.16 (OMB 
Regulations on Controlling Paperwork Burdens on the Public). The 
Federal Reserve may not conduct or sponsor, and the respondent is not 
required to respond to, an information collection that has been 
extended, revised, or implemented on or after October 1, 1995, unless 
it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Chief, Financial Reports Section--Mary M. McLaughlin--Division of 
Research and Statistics, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System, Washington, DC 20551 (202-452-3829)
OMB Desk Officer--Alexander T. Hunt--Office of Information and 
Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive 
Office Building, Room 3208, Washington, DC 20503 (202-395-7860)
    Final approval under OMB delegated authority of the extension for 
three years, without revision, of the following report:
    1. Report title: Report of Medium-Term Note Issuance
Agency form number: FR 2600m, q, and s
OMB Control number: 7100-0245
Frequency: monthly (m), quarterly (q), and semiannually (s)
Reporters: U.S. corporations
Annual reporting hours: 94
Estimated average hours per response: 0.083
Number of respondents: 424
Small businesses are not affected.
    General description of report: This information collection is 
voluntary (12 U.S.C. sections 225a and 353 et seq.) and the data 
collected will no longer be treated as confidential.
    Abstract: This report collects information on the monthly volume of 
medium-term notes issued by corporations. The Board staff obtains the 
data from the universe of issuers. Individual respondents are surveyed 
monthly, quarterly, or semiannually, depending on the level and 
frequency of the respondent's issuance activity. In addition, once a 
year, all respondents report the amount of medium-term notes 
outstanding. The information collected on this report is used to 
estimate the volume of new securities issuance by U.S. corporations 
that is published in the Federal Reserve Bulletin and to construct 
estimates of corporate securities outstanding that are used in the flow 
of funds accounts.
    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 9, 1997.
William W. Wiles,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-9635 Filed 4-14-97; 8:45AM]
Billing Code 6210-01-F
Exhibit 31.1—Section 302 CertificationI, Ellen Z. Lamale, certify that:I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containingdistribution or servicing reports filed in respect of period included in the year covered bythis annual report, of Principal Life Income Fundings Trust 2005-118;1. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report; 2. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided tothe depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, forinclusion in these reports is included in these reports; 3. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor and the trusteeunder the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, and based upon my knowledge and theannual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in thereports, the depositor and trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement;and 4. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the compliance by the trusteeand the depositor with the minimum servicing or similar standards based upon the reportprovided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with theUniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedures, as set forth inthe pooling and servicing, or similar agreements, that is included in these reports.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Ernst and Young and Citibank, N.A.   Date: March 24, 2006   By: /s/ Ellen Z. LamaleName: Ellen Z. LamaleTitle: Senior Vice President and Chief Actuary
#### Camp v. Bourbon County

104,784

09/04/13

Denied.

Unpublished
#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Shilee DIXSON, Petitioner

No. 276 WAL 2017

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

November 29, 2017

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 29th day of November, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.
No. 12-5940.

#### Cross *v.*Nevada.

Sup. Ct. Nev. Certiorari denied.
#### State v. Hayes

109,763

07/21/2015

Denied

Unpublished
|                                                                                            
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                              
|View History:                                                                               
|                                                                                            
|Oregon Natural Gas Price Sold to Electric Power Consumers  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                            
|                                                                                            
|Oregon Natural Gas Price Sold to Electric Power Consumers  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 1.49   | 1.56   | 1.96  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 2.94   | 3.82   | 3.39   | 4.51   | 5.15   | 6.73   | 5.95   | 6.10   | 7.08   | 4.25  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 4.57   | W      | W      | W      | W      | W      | W      | W      | W      | W     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | W      | W      | W      | W      |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
# C_2019058EN.01000101.xml

| 14.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 58/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 58/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9061 — GETEC Wärme & Effizienz/Pionierwerk)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 58/01)

On 16 November 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in German language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018MDEC. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018MDEC. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
#### Tremain v. Evans

106,739

09/04/13

Denied.

Unpublished
No. 12-5806.

#### McGee *v.*Rudek, Warden.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.