alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                             
|-------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                               
|View History:                                                
|                                                             
|U.S. Crude Oil Rotary Rigs in Operation  (Number of Elements)
|                                                             
|                                                             
|U.S. Crude Oil Rotary Rigs in Operation  (Number of Elements)
|                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1970's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        | NA     | NA     | NA     | NA     | NA     | NA     | NA    
|1980's                                                                                                                            | NA     | NA     | NA     | NA     | NA     | NA     | NA     | NA     | 554    | 453   
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 532    | 482    | 373    | 373    | 335    | 323    | 306    | 376    | 264    | 128   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 197    | 217    | 137    | 157    | 165    | 194    | 274    | 297    | 379    | 278   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 591    | 984    | 1,359  | 1,373  | 1,526  | 736    | 408    | 703    | 841    | 774   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 345    | 380    | 574    | 549    |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
# tableES5
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Alliance Holdings GP, L.P. (the Partnership) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Brian L. Cantrell, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Alliance GP, LLC, the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                      |  |                      
|--------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------
|By:                                                                   |  | /s/ Brian L. Cantrell
|Brian L. Cantrell                                                    
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Alliance GP, LLC
|(the general partner of Alliance Holdings GP, L.P.)                  

Date: March 6, 2009

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate document. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Table 1.3

https://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/pet_cons_psup_dc_nus_mbbl_a.htm

# RSE 1.3

https://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/pet_cons_psup_dc_nus_mbbl_a.htm
#### State v. Villa

112,107

06/21/2016

Granted.

Unpubhshed
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2019163EN.01000701.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 13.5.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 163/7 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9324 — ALSO/ABC Data)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 163/03)

1.

On 2 May 2019, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2019163EN.01000701-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | ALSO Holding AG (‘ALSO’, Switzerland), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | ABC Data Group (‘ABC Data’, Poland). |

ALSO acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control over the assets of ABC Data.

The concentration is accomplished by way of acquisition of assets.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for ALSO: wholesale of Information Technology, Telecommunications (‘ICT’) and Consumer Electronics (‘CE’) products, solutions and services in Europe.

—   for ABC Data: wholesale of computers, peripherals and software, telecommunication equipment and consumer electronics as well as the provision of related services (financing, customer support, consulting, etc.).

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9324 — ALSO/ABC Data

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2019163EN.01000701-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

---
#### State v. Jenkins

110,995

110,996

110,997

110,998

110,999

111,000

09/24/2015

Denied

Unpublished
#### State v. Richardson

103,905

05/20/13

Denied.

Unpublished
Exhibit 31(d)

Certifications of the CFO

Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Cynthia J. Devine, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of Tim Hortons Inc.; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 26, 2013



/S/ CYNTHIA J. DEVINEName: Cynthia J. DevineTitle: Chief Financial Officer
Opinion filed May 27, 2011

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals 

__________

No. 11-10-00188-CV

__________

TONY RAY MITCHELL

V.

NATALIE NICOLE MITCHELL

On Appeal from the 18th District Court

Johnson County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. D201005519

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a final decree of divorce signed on August 30, 2010. Appellant, 

Tony Ray Mitchell, timely filed a pro se notice of appeal. However, neither a reporter’s record 

nor an appellant’s brief has been filed. We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.

The court reporter notified this court that appellant neither filed a written designation 

specifying the matters to be included in the reporter’s record nor made arrangements to pay for 

the reporter’s record. On December 2, 2010, the clerk of this court wrote appellant at his last 

known address and informed him that the case would be submitted on the clerk’s record alone. 

The clerk’s letter further advised appellant that his brief would be due for filing on or before 
2

January 3, 2011. The clerk’s letter of December 2, 2010, was returned to the clerk’s office by 

the U.S. Postal Service with the notation “RETURN TO SENDER / NOT DELIVERABLE AS 

ADDRESSED / UNABLE TO FORWARD.” The clerk’s office subsequently made repeated 

attempts to call appellant by telephone in order to obtain his current mailing address, but the 

clerk’s office was never able to reach appellant.

Appellant’s brief is now more than four months overdue. Furthermore, appellant has 

failed to provide this court with his current mailing address so that the court can provide him 

with notices issued by the court as required by TEX. R. APP. P. 6.3(c). Litigants have a 

continuing duty to keep the court and parties apprised of their correct and current address. See 

Ashworth v. Brzoska, 274 S.W.3d 324, 331-32 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, no pet.). 

Therefore, pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a) and 42.3(b), the appeal is dismissed for want of 

prosecution.

PER CURIAM

May 27, 2011

Panel1consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Hill, J.2

 

1

Rick Strange, Justice, resigned effective April 17, 2011. The justice position is vacant pending appointment of a 

successor by the governor.

2

John G. Hill, Former Justice, Court of Appeals, 2nd District of Texas at Fort Worth, sitting by assignment.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
 Date: March 13, 2009
    By:

/s/ James J. BottiglieriJames J. BottiglieriRegular Trustee of Compass Diversified Holdings
Chief Financial Officer
Compass Group Diversified Holdings LLC
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 601 

To authorize testimony of Senate employees in a grand jury proceeding 

in the District of Columbia. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 29, 2010 

Mr. REID (for himself and Mr. MCCONNELL) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

To authorize testimony of Senate employees in a grand jury 

proceeding in the District of Columbia. 

Whereas, in a proceeding before a grand jury of the United 

States District Court for the District of Columbia testimony has been sought from employees of the office of 

Senator John Ensign; 

Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States 

and Rule XI of the standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the possession of the Senate may, by the judicial process, be taken from such control or possession but by permission of the Senate; 

Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or 

in the possession of the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will take such action as will 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 601 ATS 

promote the ends of justice consistent with the privileges 

of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That current or former employees of Sen2 ator John Ensign’s office are authorized to testify in the 

3 grand jury proceeding or any related proceeding, except 

4 concerning matters for which a privilege should be as5 serted. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
##### 



Exhibit 32
 Certification
Pursuant to Rule 13a-14 (b) and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (a) and (b))
  1.
    
    the annual report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the
Annual Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and2.
    
    the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: March 28, 2006
    /s/ James J. UngerJames J. Unger  - President and CEO  3.
    
    the annual report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the
Annual Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and4.
    
    the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: March 28, 2006
    /s/ William BenacWilliam Benac  Senior Vice President, CFO 109
No. 12-6136.

#### Easterling *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN JUDGMENT RENDERED FE BRUARY 26, 2013

NO. 03 - 12 - 00662 - CV Kirk Brand Coburn, Appellant

v. Janet Moreland, Appellee APPEAL FROM THE 353RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD DISMISSED -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE JONES THIS CAUSE having this day come on to be considered, and the Court having this day granted appellant’s unopposed motion to dismiss appeal and to transfer reporter’s record and exhibi ts or, alternatively, to consolidate appeals , the Court hereby consolidates Cause Nos. 03 - 12 - 00662 - CV and 03 - 12 - 00709 - CV for all purposes. The records filed in Cause No. 03 - 12 - 00662 - CV shall be transferred to Cause No. 03 - 12 - 00709 - CV. The consolidated ca uses will proceed under the style of Cause No. 03 - 12 - 00709 - CV : IT IS ACCORDINGLY considered, adjudged and ordered that the appeal in Cause No. 03 - 12 - 006 6 2 - CV is dismissed. It is FURTHER ordered that the appellant pay all costs relating to this appeal, bot h in this Court and the court below; and that this decision be certified below for observance.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 74 (Thursday, April 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 18766]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-9938]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Office of Arms Control and Nonproliferation; Proposed Subsequent 
Arrangements

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Subsequent arrangements.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to Section 131 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as 
amended (42 U.S.C. 2160), notice is hereby given of a proposed 
``subsequent arrangement'' under the Agreement for Cooperation in the 
Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy between the Government of the United 
States of America and the European Atomic Energy Community (EURATOM) 
and the Agreement for Cooperation between the Government of the United 
States of America and the Government of the Federative Republic of 
Brazil concerning Civil Uses of Atomic Energy.
    The subsequent arrangement to be carried out under the above-
mentioned agreements involves approval of the following retransfer: 
RTD/BR(EU)-9, for the transfer from France to Brazil of 26,000 grams of 
uranium containing 5,187 grams of the isotope uranium-235 (19.95 
percent enrichment) for use in fuel element production.
    In accordance with Section 131 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as 
amended, it has been determined that these subsequent arrangements will 
not be inimical to the common defense and security.
    This subsequent arrangement will take effect no sooner than fifteen 
days after the date of publication of this notice.

    Issued in Washington, D.C. on April 11, 1997.
Cherie P. Fitzgerald,
Director, International Policy and Analysis Division, Office of Arms 
Control and Nonproliferation.
[FR Doc. 97-9938 Filed 4-16-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
EXHIBIT
32.2
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Lufkin Industries, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Christopher L. Boone, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:
 
 (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and
 
 (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 /s/ Christopher L.
Boone
 Christopher
L. Boone
 Chief
Financial Officer
 November
9, 2009
 
 This
certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. §1350, and not for any
other purpose.
##### 



Eligibility
 Benefits
 (a)
    
    The amount of the death benefit payable with respect to a Participant, who at
the time of his death, (i) is employed by the Corporation, or (ii) has retired under
the normal retirement provisions of a qualified defined benefit plan maintained by the
Corporation, shall be as follows:
 Age of Participant at Death
    
    Death BenefitLess than age 70
    
    250% of Covered PayAt least age 70, but less than age 75
    
    150% of Covered PayAge 75 and over
    
    100% of Covered Pay
 (b)
    
    The amount of the death benefit payable with respect to a Participant who (i)
has retired under the early retirement provisions of a qualified




---



##### 



Years after Early Retirement orVoluntary Termination
    
    Death Benefit0 through 5
    
    250% of Covered Pay6 through 10
    
    150% of Covered Pay11 or more
    
    100% of Covered Pay
 Funding
 Payment of Benefits
 Beneficiaries
 Plan Administrator
 Reduction or Termination of Benefits
 2




---



##### 



Employment
 Severability
 Governing Law
 Effective Date
 3




---



##### 



PARTICIPANT
    
    COVERED PAY1.
    
    W. G. Bares
    
    February 26, 2001 Covered Pay2.
    
    J. L. Hambrick
    
    October 5, 2007 Covered Pay3.
    
    G. R. Hill
    
    February 26, 2001 Covered Pay4.
    
    J. E. Hodge
    
    February 26, 2001 Covered Pay5.
    
    R. A. Andreas
    
    January 1, 1996 Covered Pay6.
    
    R. Y. K. Hsu
    
    January 1, 1993 Covered Pay7.
    
    W. D. Manning
    
    January 1, 1993 Covered Pay8.
    
    R. J. Senz
    
    January 1, 1993 Covered Pay9.
    
    P. L. Krug
    
    June 1, 1990 Covered Pay10.
    
    J. A. Studebaker
    
    June 1, 1990 Covered Pay
 4
**Exhibit 23.3**
**Consent of Registered Independent PublicAccountants**We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8(No. 333-7590) of Royal Dutch Petroleum Company and The“Shell” Transport and Trading Company, Public LimitedCompany of our report dated March 5, 2003, except forNote 2(a) (First Restatement of Previously Issued FinancialStatements), which is as of May 22, 2004, and except forNote 2(b) (Second Restatement of previously issuedfinancial statements) and Note 30 (Subsequent events) whichare as of March 3, 2005, relating to the FinancialStatements of the Royal Dutch/ Shell Group of Companies which isincluded in this Amendment No. 2.
/s/ KPMG Accountants N.V.-----------------------------------------------------
**KPMG Accountants N.V.****The Hague - The Netherlands**
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP-----------------------------------------------------
**PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP****London - United Kingdom**
March 3, 2005 **E 4**      Exhibits 20-F/A (Amendment No. 2) 2002
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2019002EN.01000501.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 4.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 2/5 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9135 — The Blackstone Group/Luminor Bank)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 2/04)

1.

On 18 December 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2019002EN.01000501-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | The Blackstone Group L.P. (‘Blackstone’, United States), and |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Luminor Bank AS (‘Luminor Bank’, Estonia) which belongs to the Luminor Group AB (Sweden). |

Blackstone acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Luminor Bank.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for Blackstone: asset management and financial advisory services, and

—   for Luminor Bank: financial services, including retail and corporate banking, in Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2019002EN.01000501-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9135 — The Blackstone Group/Luminor Bank

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| E-mail: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2019002EN.01000501-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2019002EN.01000501-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---