Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 70 / Friday, April 11, 1997 / Notices 17829

1Copies of the Complaint and the Decision and

Order are available from the Commission’s Public

Reference Branch, H–130, 6th Street & Pennsylvania

Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20580.

1Copies of the Complaint and the Decision and

Order are available from the Commission’s Public

Reference Branch, H–130, 6th Street & Pennsylvania

Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20580.

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve

System, April 8, 1997.

Jennifer J. Johnson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 97–9444 Filed 4–10–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-F

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Board of

Governors of the Federal Reserve

System.

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Wednesday,

April 16, 1997.

PLACE: Marriner S. Eccles Federal

Reserve Board Building, C Street

entrance between 20th and 21st Streets,

N.W., Washington, D.C. 20551.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

1. Personnel actions (appointments,

promotions, assignments,

reassignments, and salary actions)

involving individual Federal Reserve

System employees.

2. Any items carried forward from a

previously announced meeting.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Mr. Joseph R. Coyne, Assistant to the

Board; (202) 452–3204. You may call

(202) 452–3207, beginning at

approximately 5 p.m. two business days

before this meeting, for a recorded

announcement of bank and bank

holding company applications

scheduled for the meeting.

Dated: April 9, 1997.

Jennifer J. Johnson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 97–9516 Filed 4–9–97; 10:11 am]

BILLING CODE 6210–01–P

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Dkt. C–3711]

American Honda Motor Co., Inc.;

Prohibited Trade Practices, and

Affirmative Corrective Actions

AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.

ACTION: Consent order.

SUMMARY: In settlement of alleged

violations of federal law prohibiting

unfair or deceptive acts or practices and

unfair methods of competition, this

consent order prohibits, among other

things, a California-based automobile

manufacturer from misrepresenting the

total amount due at lease inception,

requires the manufacturer to provide

consumers with clear, readable, and

understandable cost information in their

car lease and financed purchase

advertising, requires advertisements that

reference an initial payment or state that

no initial payment is due to clearly and

conspicuously disclose, as applicable,

that the deal is a lease, and to disclose

the fact that an extra charge may be

imposed at the end of the lease based on

the residual value of the car.

DATES: Complaint and Order issued

February 6, 1997.1

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

David Medine, FTC/S–4429,

Washington, D.C. 20580. (202) 326–

3224.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On

Thursday, December 5, 1996, there was

published in the Federal Register, 61 FR

64524, a proposed consent agreement

with analysis In the Matter of General

Motors Corporation and American

Honda Motor Co., Inc., for the purpose

of soliciting public comment. Interested

parties were given sixty (60) days in

which to submit comments, suggestions

or objections regarding the proposed

form of the order.

No comments having been received,

the Commission has ordered the

issuance of the complaint in the form

contemplated by the agreement, made

its jurisdictional findings and entered

an order to cease and desist, as set forth

in the proposed consent agreement, in

disposition of this proceeding.

(Sec. 6, 38 Stat. 721; 15 U.S.C. 46. Interpret

or apply sec. 5, 38 Stat. 719, as amended; 82

Stat. 146, 147; 15 U.S.C. 45, 1601, et seq.; 15

U.S.C. 1667–1667e; 12 CFR 226)

Donald S. Clark,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97–9364 Filed 4–10–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6750–01–M

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Dkt. C–3712]

American Isuzu Motors Inc., Prohibited

Trade Practices, and Affirmative

Corrective Actions

AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.

ACTION: Consent order.

SUMMARY: In settlement of alleged

violations of federal law prohibiting

unfair or deceptive acts or practices and

unfair methods of competition, this

consent order prohibits, among other

things, a California-based automobile

manufacturer from misrepresenting the

total amount due at lease inception,

requires the manufacturer to provide

consumers with clear, readable, and

understandable cost information in their

car lease and financed purchase

advertising, requires advertisements that

reference an initial payment or state that

no initial payment is due to clearly and

conspicuously disclose, as applicable,

that the deal is a lease, and to disclose

the fact that an extra charge may be

imposed at the end of the lease based on

the residual value of the car.

DATES: Complaint and Order issued

February 6, 1997.1

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

David Medine, FTC/S–4429,

Washington, D.C. 20580. (202) 326–

3224.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On

Thursday, December 5, 1996, there was

published in the Federal Register, 61 FR

64524, a proposed consent agreement

with analysis In the Matter of General

Motors Corporation and American Isuzu

Motor Inc., for the purpose of soliciting

public comment. Interested parties were

given sixty (60) days in which to submit

comments, suggestions or objections

regarding the proposed form of the

order.

No comments having been received,

the Commission has ordered the

issuance of the complaint in the form

contemplated by the agreement, made

its jurisdictional findings and entered

an order to cease and desist, as set forth

in the proposed consent agreement, in

disposition of this proceeding.

(Sec. 6, 38 Stat. 721; 15 U.S.C. 46. Interpret

or apply sec. 5, 38 Stat. 719, as amended; 82

Stat. 146, 147; 15 U.S.C. 45, 1601, et seq.; 15

U.S.C. 1667–1667e; 12 CFR 226)

[FR Doc. 97–9365 Filed 4–10–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6750–01–M

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Dkt. C–3715]

California Suncare, Inc., et al.;

Prohibited Trade Practices, and

Affirmative Corrective Actions

AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.

ACTION: Consent order.

SUMMARY: In settlement of alleged

violations of federal law prohibiting

unfair or deceptive acts or practices and

unfair methods of competition, this

consent order prohibits, among other

things, a California-based company and

its president from misrepresenting the

safety, benefits, performance or efficacy

of tanning products and UV exposure,