alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T R O S A R I O S I M O N , a .k .a . R o s ar io A n g e la P l ur a d, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 10- 73461 A ge nc yN o. A 096- 388- 291 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d A ugus t1, 2013 ** B efo re: G R A B E R , W A R D L A W , an dP A E Z , C i rcu i tJu d g es. R osar i o S i m on , a nat i ve and ci t i ze n o f the P hi l i pp i nes, pet i t i on s f or re vi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order di sm i ss i ng her app ea l fr om an im m ig r a tio n ju d g e ’s d e c is io n d e n y in g h e rap p lic a tio n f o rc an c e lla tio n o f

r e m o v a l. We d i s m i s s th e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. 

# FI LED AU G 20 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 73461 2 T h e B IA d en i edcan cel l at i o n o n tw o al t ern at i v e g ro u n d s. T h e fi rsti s a di sc re t i on ary c on clusi on thatP et i t i on erfa i l ed t o d em on strat e goo d m oralchar ac t er on a c c ountof

af r audul e ntm arr i a ge , e nt e r e d i nt o s o a s t o pr oc ur e i m m i gr a t i on benefi t s f

or P et i t i on er ’ s daugh t er . W e l ac k j uri sdi ct i on t o revi ew that d e te rm in a tio n . See L op ez -Castellan os v. G on zales , 43 7 F . 3d 84 8, 85 4 (9th C i r. 2006) . W e the r e f

or e ne e d notr e a c h the s e c ond gr ound, i n w hi c h the B I A f ound her s t atut ori l y barre d from es t abl i shi ng go od m oralchar ac t er . PETI TI O N FO R R EVI EW D I SM I SSED .
#### State v. Long

106,137

07/30/13

Denied. .

Unpublished
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                         Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8's) pertaining to the 1984 Stock Option Plan (No. 2-98841, Post
Effective Amendment No. 1, dated November 23, 1988), Stock Option Plan for
Non-Employee Directors (No. 33-43625, dated November 1, 1991), 1994 Directors'
Stock Compensation Plan (No. 33-84032, dated September 13, 1994), Robbins &
Myers, Inc. Employee Savings Plan (No. 33-61893, dated August 17, 1995), Robbins
& Myers, Inc. 1994 Long-term Incentive Plan (No. 333-00291, dated January 19,
1996), Robbins & Myers, Inc. 1995 Stock Option Plan for Non-employee Directors
(No. 333-00293, dated January 19, 1996), Robbins & Myers, Inc. Savings Plan for
Union Employees (No. 333-00289, dated February 7, 1996), Robbins & Myers, Inc.
1999 Long-term Incentive Plan (No. 333-35856, dated April 28, 2000) and the
Registration Statement (Form S-3) pertaining to Investor Stock Purchase Plan
(No. 333-31235, dated July 14, 1997) of our report dated September 30, 2002,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Robbins &
Myers, Inc. and Subsidiaries, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the
year ended August 31, 2002.



                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Dayton, Ohio
November 17, 2002



70
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 590 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 590

   Designating September 2010 as ``Gospel Music Heritage Month'' and 
honoring gospel music for its valuable contributions to the culture of 
                           the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 21, 2010

 Mrs. Lincoln (for herself and Mrs. Hutchison) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Designating September 2010 as ``Gospel Music Heritage Month'' and 
honoring gospel music for its valuable contributions to the culture of 
                           the United States.

Whereas gospel music is a beloved art form of the United States;
Whereas gospel music is a cornerstone of the musical traditions of the United 
        States and has spread beyond origins in African-American spirituals to 
        achieve popular cultural and historical relevance;
Whereas gospel music has spread beyond geographic origins in the United States 
        to touch audiences around the world; and
Whereas gospel music is a testament to the universal appeal of a historical art 
        form of the United States that both inspires and entertains across 
        racial, ethnic, religious, and geographical boundaries: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates September 2010 as ``Gospel Music Heritage 
        Month''; and
            (2) recognizes the valuable contributions to the culture of 
        the United States derived from the rich heritage of gospel 
        music and gospel music artists.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2018338EN.01001601.xml

| 21.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 338/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 338/16

---

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions given at its meeting on 10 July 2018 concerning a draft decision in Case AT.40182 — Pioneer

Rapporteur: Sweden

(2018/C 338/09)

1.

The members of the Advisory Committee agree on the Commission’s assessment that the conduct covered by the draft decision constitutes a single and continuous infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement.

2.

The members of the Advisory Committee agree with the Commission on the final amount of the fine, including its reduction based on paragraph 37 of the 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 23(2)(a) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 (1).

3.

The members of the Advisory Committee recommend the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal.

---

(1)  OJ L 1, 4.1.2003, p. 1.

1

---
#### Sanders v. State

109,677

07/21/2015

Denied. ..

Unpublished
|                                                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                 
|View History:                                                  
|                                                               
|Oregon Natural Gas Industrial Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                               
|                                                               
|Oregon Natural Gas Industrial Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                               

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------- | -------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 90,403 | 102,770 | 107,984
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 76,273 | 69,866 | 70,510 | 67,519 | 71,687 | 69,645 | 70,091 | 68,813 | 68,785  | 57,318 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 55,822 | 56,977 | 57,506 | 57,372 | 56,522 | 53,632 | 57,760 | 57,849 | 54,267  | 57,008 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 56,700 | 58,109 | 56,406 | 54,757 |        |        |        |        |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 9 (Tuesday, January 14, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 2428]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-00458]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD

Extension of Hearing Record Closure Date

AGENCY: Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board.

ACTION: Extension of hearing record closure date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (Board) convened a 
public meeting and hearing on December 10, 2013, as noticed in the 
Federal Register on August 13, 2013 (78 FR 49262), as amended, November 
12, 2013 (78 FR 67344). The hearing concerned safety-related matters at 
defense nuclear facilities at the Y-12 National Security Complex. The 
Board stated at the conclusion of the hearing that the hearing record 
would remain open until January 10, 2014.
    Extension of Time: The Board now extends the period of time for 
which the hearing record will remain open to February 10, 2014, to 
further accommodate submission of an answer to a question taken for the 
record during the course of the public hearing.

Contact Person For Further Information: Mark Welch, Acting Deputy 
General Manager, Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, 625 Indiana 
Avenue NW., Suite 700, Washington, DC 20004-2901, (800) 788-4016. This 
is a toll-free number.

    Dated: January 8, 2014.
Peter S. Winokur,
Chairman.
[FR Doc. 2014-00458 Filed 1-13-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3670-01-P
```
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 23

- 00199

- CR

T EAGAN A UBREE F I T ZGERALD

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 271st District

Court

of Wise County ( CR24730 )

August 22, 2024

Memorandum Opinion by Justice

Wallach

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By __ /s/ Mike Wallach

__________________ Justice Mike Wallach
#### Tamario DILWORTH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-30

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed August 9, 2017

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Gadsden County. Barbara Hobbs, Judge.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 10.51
 SUMMARY OF COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS
WITH NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS
 Company
 Nominating
Committee Board
 
    
    The Company will pay the lead director an annual
retainer of $58,000, and will pay each other director an annual retainer of $40,000.
 
    
    The Company will pay (i) each director who serves as
Chairman of the Audit & Ethics Committee of the Board (the Audit Committee) an annual
retainer of $18,000, (ii) each director who serves as Chairman of the Compensation
Committee of the Board an annual retainer of $10,000, and (iii) each director who
serves as Chairman of any the Nominating Committee an annual retainer of $5,000.
 
    
    The Company will reimburse each director all reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred by such director in connection with attending any
regular or special meeting of the Board or any regular or special meeting of any
committee of the Board.
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 08-1820

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Appellee,

v.

NATANAEL DE LA PAZ-RENTAS, a/k/a NATO,

Defendant, Appellant.

____________________

No. 08-1821

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Appellee,

v.

VICTOR SANJURJO-NUNEZ,

Defendant, Appellant.

___________________

No. 09-1397

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Appellee,

v.

PEDRO MOLINA-BONILLA,

Defendant, Appellant.

____________________
No. 09-1639

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Appellee,

v. 

WALDEMAR TORRES-GONZALEZ, a/k/a WALDY,

Defendant, Appellant.

____________________

ERRATA

The opinion of this Court, issued on July 20, 2010, should be

amended as follows.

On page 5, lines 3, 11, 21 and 31, replace "18 U.S.C. §§ 2,

922(a)(1)(A) & (D)" with "18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 922(a)(1)(A),

924(a)(1)(D)".
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-10-00699-CR

Charles Daren MIEARS,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. A0690

Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding

Opinion by: Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: September 7, 2011

MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED; AFFIRMED 

Charles Daren Miears pled guilty to delivery of more than one but less than four grams of 

methamphetamine in a drug free zone and pled true to being a habitual offender in exchange for 

the State’s recommendation that adjudication be deferred. Pursuant to the plea agreement, the 

trial court deferred adjudication and placed Miears on community supervision for a period of ten 

years. The State later filed a motion to adjudicate guilt, alleging Miears violated various 
04-10-00699-CR

- 2 -

conditions of his community supervision. Miears pled true to the allegations. The trial court 

adjudicated Miears guilty and sentenced him to forty years in prison. 

Miears’s court-appointed appellate attorney filed a motion to withdraw and a brief in 

which he raises no arguable points of error and concludes this appeal is frivolous and without 

merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), High v. 

State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978), and Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 1969). Miears was provided a copy of the brief and motion to withdraw and was 

informed of his right to review the record and file his own brief. He has not done so.

After reviewing the record and counsel’s brief, we find no reversible error and agree with 

counsel the appeal is wholly frivolous. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 2005). We therefore grant the motion to withdraw and affirm the trial court’s 

judgment. See id.; Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 86 (Tex. App.–San Antonio 1997, no pet.);

Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.–San Antonio 1996, no pet.).

No substitute counsel will be appointed. Should Miears wish to seek further review of 

this case by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, he must either retain an attorney to file a 

petition for discretionary review or file a pro se petition for discretionary review. Any petition 

for discretionary review must be filed within thirty days after either this opinion is rendered or

the last timely motion for rehearing or motion for en banc reconsideration is overruled by this 

court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.2. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed with the 

clerk of the Court of Criminal Appeals. See id. R. 68.3. Any petition for discretionary review 

must comply with the requirements of rule 68.4 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See

id. R. 68.4.

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

DO NOT PUBLISH
U. S. ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION

VOTING SYSTEM TESTING AND CERTIFICATION PROGRAM

1335 East West Highway, Suite 4300

Silver Spring, MD 20910

SENT VIA EMAIL

February 9, 2019

Ian Piper

Director, Federal Certification

Dominion Voting Systems

1201 18th Street, Suite 210

Denver, Colorado 80202

Approval of Voting System Testing Application Package

Dear Ian Piper,

The U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) completed the review of the application package for 

Dominion Voting Systems (Dominion) Democracy Suite 5.5-A.1. The application is accepted and 

assigned the following unique application number: DVS-DemSuite5.5-A.1. 

Dominion selected SLI Compliance as the lead VSTL for this testing engagement, and testing will be 

conducted to the VVSG 1.0. If the system meets the criteria for a grant of certification, the system will be 

assigned the number “DVS-DemSuite5.5-A.1,”as per your request on the application form (EAC-002C).

The Certification Program assigned Ryan Macias as Project Manager to oversee this testing engagement.

Brian Hancock will act as the back-up to the Project Manager. The goal of the Project Manager is to 

facilitate the communication between EAC staff, manufacturer, and VSTL to optimize the efficiency of the 

certification process. The Project Manager will monitor the voting system throughout its life cycle in the 

Certification Program, and ensure the process meets the requirements of the Certification Program’s 

manuals.

The contact information for this Project Manager is:

• Name: Ryan Macias

• E-mail: rmacias@eac.gov

• Telephone: (202) 579-5496

• Name: Brian Hancock

• E-mail: bhancock@eac.gov

• Telephone: (202) 459-7861

The EAC may at any time utilize additional technical reviewers to assist in the review of test plans, test 

cases, and test reports. All communications with the technical reviewers shall be facilitated through the 

Project Manager.
Finally, we strongly encourage you to regularly visit the EAC’s Web site (www.eac.gov) for the latest 

Notices of Interpretation and Clarification, news, program manuals, and updates. The exact location of this 

information is: http://www.eac.gov/program-areas/voting-systems. The information contained in the Notices 

of Interpretation and Clarification is critical to understanding testing standards and program requirements. It 

is a manufacturer’s responsibility to ensure they adhere to all procedural requirements of the program. 

If you have any questions or need further information about this matter, please do not hesitate to contact us at 

your earliest convenience. We thank you in advance for your cooperation in this matter.

Sincerely,

Brian Hancock

Director of Voting System Testing and Certification
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 73 (Thursday, April 16, 1998)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 18837]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10050]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service

36 CFR Part 292

RIN 0596-AB39


Smith River National Recreation Area; Correction

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In the Federal Register of March 27, 1998, the Department 
published a final rule implementing Section 8(d) of the Smith River 
National Recreation Area Act of 1990. The final rule contained 
incorrect amendatory language. This document corrects that document.

EFFECTIVE DATE: This correction is effective on April 27, 1998. As 
noted in the final rule published March 27, 1998, the final rule is 
effective on April 27, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Betty Anderson, Directives and 
Regulations Branch, Information Resources Management Staff, Forest 
Service, (703) 235-2994.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the March 27, 1998, final rule for the 
Smith River National Recreation Area, the amendatory language 
incorrectly stated that a new subpart G was being added to part 292. 
This document corrects the amendatory language in rule FR Doc. 98-7924 
(63 FR 15042, Part III) as follows:
    On page 15059, in the second column, in paragraph 5, on line 4, in 
the amendatory language ``amended by adding a new subpart G'' is 
corrected to read ``amended by revising subpart G.''

    Dated: April 10, 1998.
Sandra Key,
Acting Associate Chief.
[FR Doc. 98-10050 Filed 4-15-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
#### State v. Stevenson

111,864

03/28/2016

Denied.

Unpublished
|                                                                                               
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                 
|View History:                                                                                  
|                                                                                               
|Natural Gas Delivered to Consumers in Washington (Including Vehicle Fuel)  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                               
|                                                                                               
|Natural Gas Delivered to Consumers in Washington (Including Vehicle Fuel)  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                               

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |         | 247,530 | 281,143 | 279,656
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 280,617 | 303,060 | 227,360 | 243,072 | 253,663 | 256,580 | 256,842 | 265,211 | 291,535 | 302,930
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 278,139 | 257,945 | 255,356 | 308,148 | 297,659 | 295,715 | 289,453 | 312,571 | 294,613 | 335,468
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 315,569 | 340,125 | 337,672 | NA      |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024