alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         803,300
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,260,271
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,453,978
<PP&E>                                          77,633
<DEPRECIATION>                                 100,623
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,850,490
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          519,535
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,903
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,356,009
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,850,490
<SALES>                                      3,192,829
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,198,899
<CGS>                                        2,418,898
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,096,591
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               302,079
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,586
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                102,308
<INCOME-TAX>                                    44,820
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             57,488
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    57,488
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
No. 12-5992.

#### Moore *v.*United States.

C. A. 7th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                              66
<SECURITIES>                                    32,258
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,376
<ALLOWANCES>                                       600
<INVENTORY>                                     23,292
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                89,245
<PP&E>                                         241,621
<DEPRECIATION>                                 176,158
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 185,754
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,760
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,792
<OTHER-SE>                                     136,598
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   185,754
<SALES>                                        166,573
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               166,573
<CGS>                                          139,065
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  155,962
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,235
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,366
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,869
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,869
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.17
        

</TABLE>
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 325 

Designating October 25 through October 31, 2009, as ‘‘National Hispanic 

Media Week’’ in honor of the Latino Media of America. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 27, 2009 

Mr. REID (for himself, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, Mr. UDALL of Colorado, Mr. 

BINGAMAN, Mr. BENNET, and Mr. MENENDEZ) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating October 25 through October 31, 2009, as ‘‘National Hispanic Media Week’’ in honor of the Latino 

Media of America. 

Whereas for almost 470 years the United States has benefitted from the work of Hispanic writers and publishers; 

Whereas there are over 800 Hispanic newspapers with a circulation of 17,800,000, and over 550 Hispanic magazines 

with a circulation of 31,600,000; 

Whereas Hispanic television and radio programs respond to 

the bilingual needs of the United States Latino population; 

Whereas market research estimates that the reach of Spanish 

language television is nearly universal; 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 325 ATS 

Whereas 1 in 8 Americans is served by a Hispanic publication throughout the Nation; 

Whereas the Latino print media generated $1,400,000,000 in 

revenue last year, despite adverse economic conditions; 

Whereas the Hispanic press informs many Americans about 

significant political, economic, and social issues of our 

day; 

Whereas the Hispanic press in the United States focuses in 

particular on informing and promoting the well being of 

our country’s Hispanic community; and 

Whereas commemorating the achievements of the Hispanic 

press acknowledges the important role the Hispanic press 

has played in United States history: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates October 25 through October 31, 

3 2009, as ‘‘National Hispanic Media Week’’ in honor 

4 of the Latino Media of America; and 

5 (2) encourages the people of the United States 

6 to observe the week with appropriate programs and 

7 activities. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
#### State v. Boyd

107,391

08/30/13

Denied

Unpublished
**Exhibit 99.5**
In connection with the Amendment No. 2 onForm 20-F/A of Royal Dutch Petroleum Company (N.V.Koninklijke Nederlandsche Petroleum Maatschappij), a corporationorganized under the laws of the Netherlands (the“Company”) for the period ending December 31,2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersignedofficers of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to such officer’sknowledge, that:
1.the Amendment No.2 fully complies, in all    material respects, with the requirements of Section 13(a)    or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and     2.the information contained in the    Amendment No.2 fairly presents, in all material respects,    the financial condition and results of operations of the Company    as of, and for, the periods presented in the Amendment No.2.    
The foregoing certification is provided solelyfor purposes of complying with the provisions ofSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is notintended to be used or relied upon for any other purpose.
Dated March 3, 2005
/s/ Jeroen van der Veer---------------------------------------------------------------**Jeroen van der Veer****President and Managing Director**
/s/ Peter Voser---------------------------------------------------------------**Peter Voser****Chief Financial Officer** Exhibits      **E13** 20-F/A (Amendment No. 2) 2002
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 64 (Thursday, April 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15877-15878]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-8451]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ARMS CONTROL AND DISARMAMENT AGENCY


The Establishment of the Director's Advisory Committee (DirAC)

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, 
the U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency (ACDA) announces the 
establishment of the Director's Advisory Committee (DirAC). The 
Committee will provide the Director of ACDA with a continuing source of 
independent insight, advice, and innovation on all aspects of arms 
control, disarmament, and nonproliferation. Because the successful 
conduct of arms control

[[Page 15878]]

requires a synthesis of physical science, social science, military 
technology and strategy, diplomacy, and politics, the committee will be 
composed of persons with expertise in one or more of these areas. The 
work of this committee will be instrumental in enabling ACDA to 
contribute to the reduction or elimination of some significant threats 
to American national security. The committee will operate for two years 
unless terminated sooner or renewed.
John D. Holum,
Director.
[FR Doc. 97-8451 Filed 4-2-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-32-M
EXHIBIT 99.1 -  a) and b) Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm KPMG LLP Suite 2300 Three Wachovia Center 401 South Tryon Street Charlotte, NC 28202-1911 **Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**The Board of Directors Wachovia Bank, National Association  Wachovia Education Finance Inc.: We have examined management's  assertion, included in the accompanying  Management's Assertion, that Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Administrator, and Wachovia Education Finance Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Wachovia Bank, National Association (the Company), as Master Servicer, for Wachovia Student Loan Trust 2005-1,  complied with the servicing criteria set forth in  Item 1122(d) of the  Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the servicing of Wachovia Student Loan Trust 2005-1, except for servicing criteria  1.iii., 2.iii.,  4.v., 4.x.a., 4.x.b., 4.x.c., 4.xi., 4.xii.,  and  4.xiii.,  which the Company has determined as being inapplicable to the activities it performs with respect to Wachovia Student Loan Trust 2005-1 and servicing criteria 2.i., 4.i., 4.ii., 4.iv., 4.vii., 4.viii., and  4.ix.,  which the Company has determined were activit ies performed by subservicers for all loans owned by Wachovia Student Loan Trust 2005-1,  as of and  for the period from November 29, 2005 (Inception of the Trust) to December 31, 2005.  Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with those servicing criteria.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance based on our examination.  Our examination was conducted in accordance with  the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)****and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. In our opinion, management's  assertion that  the  Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the  period from November 29, 2005 (inception of the Trust) to December 31, 2005 is fairly stated, in all material respects.                                                          /s/  KPMG LLP Charlotte, North Carolina March 27, 2006
#### State v. Chambers

106,520

09/04/13

Denied. ...

Unpublished
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 10257 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v. ROBERTO BERRONES

- VARGAS , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 1 :14

- CR

- 59

- 1

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Roberto Berrones

- Vargas appeals the 71

- month within

- guidelines sentence he received following his guilty plea to illegal reentry, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. For the first time on appeal, he contends that his sentence is procedurally unreasonable because the district court failed to adequately explain the reasons for the sentence imposed, specifically failing to address his mitigation argument s .

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 15, 2015 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-10257 Document: 00513193437 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/15/2015No. 15

- 10257

2 Because Berrones

- Vargas did not raise the objection below, review is for plain error only. See United States v. Mondragon

- Santia go , 564 F.3d 357, 361 (5th Cir. 2009). To establish plain error, Berrones

- Vargas must show a forfeited error that is clear or obvious and that affects his substantial rights. Puckett v. United States , 556 U.S. 129, 135 (2009). Even if he makes such a sh owing, this court has the discretion to correct the error but will do so only if it seriously affects the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings. Id. Given that the sentence imposed was within the guidelines range, little

ex planation of the sentence was required, and the district court’s statement, in response to Berrones

- Vargas’s plea for a more lenient sentence, that a sentence at the high end of the guidelines range was necessary for just punishment and deterrence , was suf ficiently explanatory. See Rita v. United States , 551 U.S. 338, 356

- 57 (2007). Moreover, even if it is assumed that the district court’s statement amounted to clear or obvious error, the error is not reversible given that Berrones

- Vargas has not shown th at his substantial rights were affected. See United States v. Whitelaw , 580 F.3d 256, 262

- 63 (5th Cir. 2009); Mondragon

- Santiago , 564 F.3d at 365

. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED

. Case: 15-10257 Document: 00513193437 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/15/2015
#### State v. Billings

109,726

07/22/2015

Denied.

Unpublished
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

 

No. 08-2490

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Appellee,

v.

EDDY ROA-MEDINA,

Defendant, Appellant.

 

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on June 2, 2010, is amended as follows:

On the coversheet replace "Chauncy" with "Chauncey"
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 520 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 520

Honoring the 100th anniversary of the establishment of Glacier National 
                                 Park.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 10, 2010

    Mr. Baucus (for himself and Mr. Tester) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Honoring the 100th anniversary of the establishment of Glacier National 
                                 Park.

Whereas Glacier National Park was established as the 10th National Park on May 
        11, 1910;
Whereas Glacier National Park is part of the Waterton-Glacier International 
        Peace Park, the world's first international peace park;
Whereas Glacier National Park has a total of 25 named glaciers;
Whereas water originating in the park is considered the headwaters of three 
        major drainages;
Whereas Glacier National Park is the core of the ``Crown of the Continent 
        Ecosystem'', one of the country's largest intact ecosystems;
Whereas Glacier National Park encompasses over 1,000,000 acres, 762 lakes, more 
        than 60 native species of mammals, 277 species of birds, and almost 
        2,000 plant species;
Whereas Glacier National Park's lands hold great spiritual importance to the 
        Blackfeet and the Salish and Kootenai native peoples;
Whereas the Park contains 110 miles of the Continental Divide Trail;
Whereas the Going-to-the-Sun Road in Glacier National Park was completed in 1932 
        and is a National Historic Civil Engineering Landmark;
Whereas in 1976 Glacier was dedicated a Biosphere Reserve by UNESCO;
Whereas in 1995 Waterton-Glacier International Peace Park was designated a World 
        Heritage Site; and
Whereas Glacier National Park receives approximately 2,000,000 visitors a year: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the people of the United States should observe and 
celebrate the 100th anniversary of the establishment of Glacier 
National Park in Montana on May 11, 2010.
                                 <all>
```
July 30, 2015

ID: FAA-2015-2221-0001

United States Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

West Building Ground Floor Room W12-140

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Exemption Request Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act of 2012

Dear Sir or Madam:

As a supplementation to our original 333 Exemption Application, dated June 11, 2015, 

we wish to provide to you the following additional information. 

The specific reasons we seek relief is to operate in the following areas of commerce:

1. Closed Set Filming

 Our MPTOM is outlined in the document located in the attachment. Please refer 

to the attachment document labeled: ARP MPTOM

2. Geographical Mapping

3. Agricultural Mapping and Analysis

4. Real Estate Photography and Video

5. General Aerial Photography and Video

In addition, we are providing to you all of the Release forms we currently use in our film 

and photography operations. 

We hope this information helps sure up any concerns the FAA has toward our approval 

process. If more information is needed, we are always available to provide to your office 

any and all requested documentation. Thank you for you time and consideration.

Sincerely,

Amy Andersen-Ross

Andersen Ross Photography

16119 73rd Place West

Edmonds, WA 98026
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 20-1193

___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v. Cesar Medel-Vargas lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Fayetteville

____________ Submitted: June 30, 2020 Filed: July 6, 2020 [Unpublished]

____________ Before GRASZ, BEAM, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. Cesar Medel-Vargas appeals after he pled guilty to illegal reentry, and the district court 1 imposed a sentence at the bottom of the advisory range under the

1 The Honorable Timothy L. Brooks, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.United States Sentencing Guidelines Manual (“Guidelines”). His counsel has moved

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing Medel-Vargas’s sentence is substantively unreasonable. Upon careful review, we conclude the district court did not impose a substantively unreasonable sentence. See United States v. Feemster , 572 F.3d 455, 461-62 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc) (reviewing sentence under deferential abuse-of-discretion standard and discussing substantive reasonableness). In addition, having reviewed the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we affirm, and we grant counsel leave to withdraw.

______________________________

-2-
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 24

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY
                                -----------------

                            ROYAL APPLIANCE MFG. CO.
                            ------------------------



       KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS; that Royal Appliance Mfg. Co. and each
person whose name is signed below hereby constitute and appoint Michael J.
Merriman and Richard G. Vasek, or both of them, their attorney-in-fact and
agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for and on behalf of
Royal Appliance Mfg. Co. and the undersigned Directors and officers of Royal
Appliance Mfg. Co., to sign Royal Appliance Mfg. Co.'s Annual Report on Form
10-K, any or all amendments thereto, and to file the same, with exhibits thereto
and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, granting such attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to
do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary in
connection with such matters and hereby ratifying and confirming all that such
attorney-in-fact and agent or his substitute or substitutes may do or cause to
be done by virtue hereof.

       This Power of Attorney of Royal Appliance Mfg. Co. and the Directors and
officers of Royal Appliance Mfg. Co. may be executed in multiple counterparts,
each of which shall be deemed an original with respect to the person executing
it.

       IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Power of Attorney has been signed at Cleveland,
Ohio this 13th day of March, 1998.


                          ROYAL APPLIANCE MFG. CO.


                          By:   /s/ Richard G. Vasek
                               ----------------------------------------
                              Richard G. Vasek, Controller, Secretary
                              and Chief Accounting Officer


                                    DIRECTORS

  /s/ Jack Kahl Jr.                     /s/ Michael J. Merriman
---------------------------            -------------------------------------
 Jack Kahl Jr.                         Michael J. Merriman


  /s/ E. Patrick Nalley                 /s/ Joseph B. Richey, II
---------------------------            -------------------------------------
 E. Patrick Nalley                     Joseph B. Richey, II


  /s/ John P. Rochon                    /s/ R. Louis Schneeberger
---------------------------            -------------------------------------
 John P. Rochon                        R. Louis Schneeberger