alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.1    
    


 
 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002    
    


        In connection with the Annual Report of Orange plc (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certify that to the best of our knowledge: 


	1.
	The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



	2.
	The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 



        A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 


        In
accordance with the interim guidance for Section 906 certification issued by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on March 21, 2003 in Release
No. 33-8212, this certification will not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that
section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that the
Company specifically incorporates it by reference. 



	

Date: June 27, 2003	
 	

/s/  JOHN ALLWOOD      
 Chief Executive Officer





	

Date: June 27, 2003	
 	

/s/  MIKE NEWNHAM      
 Chief Financial Officer











QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
```

                                                                   Exhibit 32(a)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

   In connection with the Quarterly Report of The LGL Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeremiah M. Healy, Principal Executive
Officer of the Company, and I, Steve Pegg, Principal Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to our knowledge:

      (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
   15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
   material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
   Company.

November 14, 2007                               /s/ Jeremiah M. Healy
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Jeremiah M. Healy
                                                PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

November 14, 2007                               /s/ Steve Pegg
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Steve Pegg
                                                PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
```
#### State v. Cotton

109,934

08/18/2015

Denied.

Unpublished
#### State v. Smith

107,695

08/19/13

Denied.

Unpublished
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 73 (Thursday, April 16, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18940-18941]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10164]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Chemistry; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Chemistry (#1191).
    Date and Time: May 4-5, 1998.
    Place: Rooms 310, 365 and 370, NSF, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, 
Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Joseph Reed, Program Director, Chemical 
Instrumentation Program, Chemistry Division, Room 1055, National 
Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, 
Telephone: (703) 306-1849.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate proposals for the Chemistry 
Research Instrumentation

[[Page 18941]]

and Facilities Program and the Major Research Instrumentation 
Program as part of the selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information, financial data such as salaries, and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. 
These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: April 13, 1998.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-10164 Filed 4-15-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 439 

Recognizing the exemplarily service, devotion to country, and selfless sacrifice 

of Special Warfare Operators 2nd Class Matthew McCabe and Jonathan 

Keefe and Special Warfare Operator 1st Class Julio Huertas in capturing 

Ahmed Hashim Abed, one of the most-wanted terrorists in Iraq, and 

pledging to continue to support members of the United States Armed 

Forces serving in harm’s way. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 4, 2010 

Mr. ENSIGN submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the exemplarily service, devotion to country, and 

selfless sacrifice of Special Warfare Operators 2nd Class 

Matthew McCabe and Jonathan Keefe and Special Warfare Operator 1st Class Julio Huertas in capturing 

Ahmed Hashim Abed, one of the most-wanted terrorists 

in Iraq, and pledging to continue to support members 

of the United States Armed Forces serving in harm’s 

way. 

Whereas in September 2009, Special Warfare Operators 2nd 

Class Matthew McCabe and Jonathan Keefe and Special 

Warfare Operator 1st Class Julio Huertas successfully 

captured Ahmed Hashim Abed, one of the most-wanted 

terrorists in Iraq; 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 439 IS 

Whereas Ahmed Hashim Abed is the alleged planner of the 

March 21, 2004, ambush of a supply convoy in Fallujah, 

Iraq, which resulted in the brutal killing of 4 Blackwater 

security contractors; 

Whereas Ahmed Hashim Abed evaded capture in Iraq for 

more than 5 years until his capture by the 3 Navy 

SEALs; 

Whereas Special Warfare Operators 2nd Class Matthew 

McCabe and Jonathan Keefe and Special Warfare Operator 1st Class Julio Huertas are exceptional sailors who 

accomplished their mission in the finest tradition of the 

Navy SEALs and the United States Armed Forces while 

defending their country and protecting the citizens of 

Iraq; 

Whereas the capture of Ahmed Hashim Abed serves as an 

important reminder that the United States is still engaged in a Global War on Terror; and 

Whereas it is because of the efforts of these courageous Navy 

SEALs and other members of the Armed Forces that 

Americans continue to be free: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes the exemplarily service, devotion 

3 to country, and selfless sacrifice of Special Warfare 

4 Operators 2nd Class Matthew McCabe and Jona5 than Keefe and Special Warfare Operator 1st Class 

6 Julio Huertas; and 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 439 IS 

1 (2) pledges to continue to support members of 

2 the United States Armed Forces serving in harm’s 

3 way. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 594 

To constitute the majority party’s membership on certain committees for 

the One Hundred Eleventh Congress, or until their successors are chosen. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 22, 2010 

Mr. REID submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed 

to 

RESOLUTION 

To constitute the majority party’s membership on certain 

committees for the One Hundred Eleventh Congress, or 

until their successors are chosen. 

1 Resolved, That the following shall constitute the ma2 jority party’s membership on the following committees for 

3 the One Hundred Eleventh Congress, or until their succes4 sors are chosen: 

5 COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS: Mr. Inouye 

6 (Chairman), Mr. Leahy, Mr. Harkin, Ms. Mikulski, Mr. 

7 Kohl, Mrs. Murray, Mr. Dorgan, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Dur8 bin, Mr. Johnson, Ms. Landrieu, Mr. Reed, Mr. Lauten9 berg, Mr. Nelson (Nebraska), Mr. Pryor, Mr. Tester, Mr. 

10 Specter, and Mr. Brown (Ohio). 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 594 ATS 

1 COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES: Mr. Levin (Chair2 man), Mr. Lieberman, Mr. Reed, Mr. Akaka, Mr. Nelson 

3 (Florida), Mr. Nelson (Nebraska), Mr. Bayh, Mr. Webb, 

4 Mrs. McCaskill, Mr. Udall (Colorado), Mrs. Hagan, Mr. 

5 Begich, Mr. Burris, Mr. Bingaman, Mr. Kaufman, and 

6 Mr. Goodwin. 

7 COMMITTEE ON THE BUDGET: Mr. Conrad (Chair8 man), Mrs. Murray, Mr. Wyden, Mr. Feingold, Mr. Nelson 

9 (Florida), Ms. Stabenow, Mr. Cardin, Mr. Sanders, Mr. 

10 Whitehouse, Mr. Warner, Mr. Merkley, Mr. Begich, and 

11 Mr. Goodwin. 

12 COMMITTEE ON HEALTH, EDUCATION, LABOR, AND

13 PENSIONS: Mr. Harkin (Chairman), Mr. Dodd, Ms. Mikul14 ski, Mr. Bingaman, Mrs. Murray, Mr. Reed, Mr. Sanders, 

15 Mr. Casey, Mrs. Hagan, Mr. Merkley, Mr. Franken, Mr. 

16 Bennet, and Mr. Goodwin. 

17 COMMITTEE ON RULES AND ADMINISTRATION: Mr. 

18 Schumer (Chairman), Mr. Inouye, Mr. Dodd, Mrs. Fein19 stein, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Nelson (Nebraska), Mrs. Murray, 

20 Mr. Pryor, Mr. Udall (New Mexico), Mr. Warner, and Mr. 

21 Goodwin. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 74 (Friday, April 17, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 19263]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10217]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-1211-DR]


North Carolina; Amendment to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of North Carolina, (FEMA-1211-DR), dated March 22, 1998, and 
related determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 6, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madge Dale, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3260.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster for the State 
of North Carolina, is hereby amended to include the following areas 
among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the 
catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of March 22, 1998:

Lenoir and Wayne Counties for Individual Assistance.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community 
Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis 
Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression 
Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 
83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 
83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program)
Lacy E. Suiter,
Executive Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 98-10217 Filed 4-16-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
|                                                                                 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                   
|View History:                                                                    
|                                                                                 
|Nebraska Natural Gas Deliveries to Electric Power Consumers  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                 
|                                                                                 
|Nebraska Natural Gas Deliveries to Electric Power Consumers  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 2,687  | 5,080  | 4,582 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 5,522  | 4,290  | 4,947  | 4,593  | 3,340  | 8,066  | 7,787  | 10,908 | 7,230  | 3,331 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 3,949  | 4,223  | 7,696  | 5,080  | 4,189  | 4,255  | 5,791  | 6,168  | 9,196  | 12,037
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 10,837 | 11,276 | 11,171 | 20,409 |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned executive officers of United Community Bancorp (the Registrant) hereby certify that this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



By:

/s/ William F. RitzmannName:

William F. RitzmannTitle:

President and Chief Executive Officer




By:

/s/ Vicki A. MarchName:

Vicki A. MarchTitle:

Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer


Date: September 26, 2006
NUMBER 13-19-00421-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

IN THE INTEREST OF G. A. L., A CHILD

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 148th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Hinojosa and Tijerina

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Hinojosa

Appellant, Gonzalo Conde Leal, appeals the trial court’s order in a suit affecting 

the parent-child relationship entered by the 148th District Court of Nueces County, Texas

in cause number 2019-FAM-3070-A. On August 30, 2019, the Clerk of this Court notified 

appellant that the notice of appeal failed to comply with Texas Rule of Appellate 

Procedure 9.5(d), 9.5(e), 25.1(d),(e). See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.5(e), 25.1(d),(e). The Clerk 

directed appellant to file an amended notice of appeal with the district clerk's office within 

30 days from the date of that notice. On October 2, 2019, the Clerk notified appellant 
2

that the defect had not been corrected and warned appellant that the appeal would be 

dismissed if the defect was not cured within ten days. Appellant has not responded to 

the notice from the Clerk or corrected the defect.

On September 16, 2019, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that he was

delinquent in remitting a $205.00 filing fee. The Clerk of this Court notified appellant that 

the appeal was subject to dismissal if the filing fee was not paid within ten days from the 

date of receipt of this letter. See id. R. 42.3(b),(c). 

An appellate court may dismiss a civil appeal for want of prosecution or failure to 

comply with a notice from the clerk requiring a response or other action within a specified 

time. See id. R. 42.3(b),(c). Appellant has failed to respond to this Court’s notices and 

has failed to pay the filing fee. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED for want of 

prosecution and failure to comply with a notice from the Court. See id.

LETICIA HINOJOSA

Justice

Delivered and filed the

14th day of November, 2019.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
      This schedule contains summary financial  information extracted from Swift
Energy Income Partners 1987-A,  Ltd.'s balance sheet and statement of operations
con-  tained  in its  Form  10-Q for the  quarter  ended  June  30,  1997 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         1,057
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  108,360
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               109,417
<PP&E>                                         13,860,727
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (11,085,998)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,884,146
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          90,948
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,660,188
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,884,146
<SALES>                                        289,414
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               293,858
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  205,774<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                12,470
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            12,470
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   12,470
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
#### State v. Williams

108,557

08/29/13

Denied.

Unpublished
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-31274 

Summary Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

BILLY RAY TATUM,

 Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 91-CR-50073

- - - - - - - - - -

May 15, 1996

Before REAVLEY, SMITH and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Billy Ray Tatum argues that the district court erred in

denying his motion to reduce his sentence. 

We have reviewed the record, including the transcripts of

Tatum's rearraignment and sentencing hearings, and the briefs of

the parties, and have determined that the district court's denial

of the motion should be affirmed. The district court did not

have jurisdiction to reduce Tatum's sentence pursuant to 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) because he was not asserting that he was 
No. 95-31274

-2-

entitled to relief under an amended guideline that had been given

retroactive effect by the Sentencing Commission. See U.S.S.G.

§ 1B1.10(c), p.s.; United States v. Early, 27 F.3d 140, 142 (5th

Cir.), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 600 (1994)

Tatum is challenging the district court's initial denial of

a credit for acceptance of responsibility and its decision to

sentence him as a career offender. These claims, which could

have been raised on direct appeal but were not, are not

cognizable pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. See United States v.

Capua, 656 F.2d 1033, 1037 (5th Cir. 1981).

The district court did not commit plain error in denying

Tatum's claims that he was subjected to selective prosecution and

that his sentence was improperly enhanced pursuant to 18 U.S.C.

§ 924(e)(1). The former argument does not have a sufficient

factual basis to support relief, and the latter argument is

factually incorrect. 

Tatum's argument that he was subjected to double jeopardy

has no arguable merit. See United States v. Moore, 958 F.2d 646,

650 (5th Cir. 1992). Nor does his argument that the district

court breached the plea agreement by relying on the presentence

report at sentencing have any merit. Tatum acknowledged in the

plea agreement and at his rearraignment that his sentence could

not be determined by the district court until the presentence

report had been completed. 

Tatum argued for the first time in his reply brief that he

was entitled to a jury trial to determine whether he violated 18

U.S.C. § 924(e) and that he was subjected to multiple punishment
No. 95-31274

-3-

because his property was forfeited without a hearing and he did

not receive a sixteen-month credit on his federal sentence. 

This court will not review issues that are initially raised in a

reply brief. United States v. Prince, 868 F.2d 1379, 1386 (5th

Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 932 (1989).

AFFIRMED.
Appendix H

– MOBILE6 Input and Output Files
No. 12-6021.

#### Cofield *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.