III 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 519 

Expressing the sense of the Senate that the primary safeguard for the 

well-being and protection of children is the family, and that the primary 

safeguards for the legal rights of children in the United States are 

the Constitutions of the United States and the several States, and that, 

because the use of international treaties to govern policy in the United 

States on families and children is contrary to principles of self-government and federalism, and that, because the United Nations Convention 

on the Rights of the Child undermines traditional principles of law 

in the United States regarding parents and children, the President should 

not transmit the Convention to the Senate for its advice and consent. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 10, 2010 

Mr. DEMINT submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Relations 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the Senate that the primary safeguard for the well-being and protection of children is 

the family, and that the primary safeguards for the 

legal rights of children in the United States are the 

Constitutions of the United States and the several 

States, and that, because the use of international treaties 

to govern policy in the United States on families and 

children is contrary to principles of self-government and 

federalism, and that, because the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child undermines traditional 

principles of law in the United States regarding parents 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 519 IS 

and children, the President should not transmit the Convention to the Senate for its advice and consent. 

Whereas the Senate affirms the commitment of the people 

and the Government of the United States to the wellbeing, protection, and advancement of children, and the 

protection of the inalienable rights of all persons of all 

ages; 

Whereas the Constitution and laws of the United States and 

those of the several States are the best guarantees 

against mistreatment of children in this Nation; 

Whereas the Constitution, laws, and traditions of the United 

States affirm the rights of parents to raise their children 

and to impart their values and religious beliefs; 

Whereas the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the 

Child, adopted at New York November 20, 1989, and entered into force September 2, 1990, if ratified, would become a part of the supreme law of the land, taking precedence over all State laws and constitutions; 

Whereas the United States, and not the several States, would 

be held responsible for compliance with this Convention 

if ratified, and as a consequence, the United States would 

create an incredible expansion of subject matter jurisdiction over all matters concerning children, seriously undermining the constitutional balance between the Federal 

Government and the governments of the several States; 

Whereas Professor Geraldine Van Bueren, the author of the 

principal textbook on the international rights of the child, 

and a participant in the drafting of the Convention, has 

described the ‘‘best interest of the child standard’’ in the 

treaty as ‘‘provid[ing] decision and policy makers with 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 519 IS 

the authority to substitute their own decisions for either 

the child’s or the parents’’; 

Whereas the Scottish Government has issued a pamphlet to 

children of that country explaining their rights under the 

Convention, which declares that children have the right 

to decide their own religion and that parents can only 

provide advice; 

Whereas the United Nations Committee on the Rights of the 

Child has repeatedly interpreted the Convention to ban 

common disciplinary measures utilized by parents; 

Whereas the Government of the United Kingdom was found 

to be in violation of the Convention by the United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child for allowing 

parents to exercise a right to opt their children out of sex 

education courses in the public schools without a prior 

government review of the wishes of the child; 

Whereas the United Nations Committee on the Rights of the 

Child has held that the Governments of Indonesia and 

Egypt were out of compliance with the Convention because military expenditures were given inappropriate priority over children’s programs; 

Whereas these and many other interpretations of the Convention by those charged with its implementation and by 

other authoritative supporters demonstrates that the provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Rights 

of the Child are utterly contrary to the principles of law 

in the United States and the inherent principles of freedom; 

Whereas the decisions and interpretations of the United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child would be considered by the Committee to be binding and authoritative 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
4 

•SRES 519 IS 

upon the United States should the United States Government ratify the Convention, such that the Convention 

poses a threat to the sovereign rights of the United 

States and the several States to make final determinations regarding domestic law; and 

Whereas the proposition that the United States should be 

governed by international legal standards in its domestic 

policy is tantamount to proclaiming that the Congress of 

the United States and the legislatures of the several 

States are incompetent to draft domestic laws that are 

necessary for the proper protection of children, an assertion that is not only an affront to self-government but an 

inappropriate attack on the capability of legislators in the 

United States: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that— 

2 (1) the United Nations Convention on the 

3 Rights of the Child, adopted at New York November 

4 20, 1989, and entered into force September 2, 1990, 

5 is incompatible with the Constitution, the laws, and 

6 the traditions of the United States; 

7 (2) the Convention would undermine proper 

8 presumptions of freedom and independence for fami9 lies in the United States, supplanting those prin10 ciples with a presumption in favor of governmental 

11 intervention without the necessity for proving harm 

12 or wrong-doing; 

13 (3) the Convention would interfere with the 

14 principles of sovereignty, independence, and self-govVerDate Mar 15 2010 23:52 May 10, 2010 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\SR519.IS SR519

jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
5 

•SRES 519 IS 

1 ernment in the United States that preclude the ne2 cessity or propriety of adopting international law to 

3 govern domestic matters; and 

4 (4) the President should not transmit the Con5 vention to the Senate for its advice and consent. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS