alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
                            SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Ronson
Corporation (the "Company"), certifies that:

         (1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended
December 31, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78 m or 78
o(d)); and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: April 15, 2009                /s/ Louis V. Aronson II
                                     ------------------------------------------
                                     Louis V. Aronson II
                                     President and Chief Executive Officer


Dated: April 15, 2009                /s/ Daryl K. Holcomb
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Daryl K. Holcomb
                                     Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

         This certification is made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.



                                       87
No. 12-5016.

#### Amezcua *v.*Eighth Judicial District Court of Nevada, Clark County, et al.

Sup. Ct. Nev. Certiorari denied.
# C_2021116EN.01002101.xml

| 31.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 116/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 116/21

---

P8_TA(2019)0337

Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States *

European Parliament legislative resolution of 4 April 2019 on the proposal for a Council decision on guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States (COM(2019)0151 — C8-0131/2019 — 2019/0056(NLE))

(Consultation)

(2021/C 116/10)

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2019)0151), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2019)0151),

| — | having regard to Article 148(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0131/2019), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 148(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0131/2019),

| — | having regard to Rule 78c of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 78c of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs (A8-0177/2019), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs (A8-0177/2019),

| 1. | Approves the Commission proposal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

2.

| 3. | Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to substantially amend the text approved by Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

3.

| 4. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

4.

---
No. 12-6831 (12A398).

#### Ferguson *v.*Palmer, Warden, et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to Justice Thomas, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Certiorari denied.

The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this application and this petition.
#### State v. Williams

108,416

08/29/13

Denied.

Unpublished
# C_2019006EN.01000101.xml

| 9.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9217 — Engie/EDPR/Repsol/Windplus)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 6/01)

On 12 December 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9217. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9217. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
p. 1



# OAR Box 1787 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 76 ) ll-C-3 4
Docket Number: 

# A-90-3 7

Printed 11/4/2008 10:22:19 AM Sheet 76 of 147

# , • P. 2 

## $ 

## tt \
\ cf UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N AGENC Y Offic e o f Ai rQualityPlannin g an d Standard s Researc h Triangl e Park , Nort h Carolin a 2771 1 

# /?

- 

# 70-3/ 

# ll~C-nf

1 3 J U M 10S 9

Mr . Michae l Glen n Porter , Wright , Morri s & Arthu r 123 3 20t hStreet , N.W . Washington , D.C . 20036-239 5
Dea r Mr . Glenn : i L:;
- ~^ P 7-77 ;

Thi s i s i

n respons e t o you r letter s o f Ma y 3 an d Ma y 10 , 1989 , supplementin g th e petitio nsubmitte db y th e America nPape r Institut e an d th e Nationa l Fores t Product s Associatio nregardin g th e "top-down " proces s fo r determinin g bes t availabl e contro l technolog y unde r th e preventio no f significan t deterioratio nprovision s o f th e Clea nAi r Act . I believ e tha t th e Ma y 12 , 198 9 lette r fro

m Administrato r Reill y full y addresse s th e centra l point s raise din thi s petition . However , you r recen t letter s indicat e that , base di npar t onth e Environmenta l Protectio nAgenc y (EPA ) document s recentl y furnishe dt o you , ther e ma y b e a misimpressio no n you r par t regardin g th e basi s fo r an d provision s o f Agenc y policy .

: In orde r t o avoi dan y possibl e misunderstandin g regardin g EPA' s position , I hav e enclose da copy o f a backgroun dstatemen t o nth e top-dow

npolic y

whic h I hav e distribute dt o EPA' s Regiona l Offices . Th e EPA ha s als o prepare d(i n draf t form ) a separat e summar y o f th e top dow nprocess . Th e draf t summary , whic hI hav e als o enclosed , i s currentl y unde r revie w

b y th e EPA

Regiona l Office s an

d representative s o f Stat e an d loca l ai r pollutio ncontro l agencies . Th e enclose ddocument s provid e additiona l detail s o nth e reason s why EP A ha s adopte dthi s policy , a s wel l a s a genera l discussio no f th e top-down methodology . I hop e thi s adequatel y addresse s an

y concern s yo u ma y

hav e had . Sincerely ,
Calcagn i Directo r Ai rQiialit yManagemen t Divis i Enclosure s

## viT
. P. 3



### Fo r enclosure s t o docket

itemII-C-6 , Jun e 13 , 198 9 lette r fro mJohn Calcagni to Michael Glenn , se e docket

item s indicated

.
II-C- 4 Ma

y 25 , 198 9 'Draf

t "Top-Down " Best

Availabl e Contro l Technology : A Summary ' II-B-1 5 "Backgroun dStatement on th e EPA' s Top-Dow n Policy "
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 703 

Recognizing and honoring Bob Feller and expressing the condolences of the 

Senate to his family on his death. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 18, 2010 

Mr. HARKIN (for himself, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. BROWN of Ohio, Mr. 

VOINOVICH, and Mr. BUNNING) submitted the following resolution; which 

was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing and honoring Bob Feller and expressing the 

condolences of the Senate to his family on his death. 

Whereas Robert William Andrew (‘‘Bob’’) Feller was born on 

November 3, 1918, near Van Meter, Iowa; 

Whereas Bob Feller learned to play baseball on his parents’ 

farm in Dallas County, Iowa, and commented that ‘‘What 

kid wouldn’t enjoy the life I led in Iowa? Baseball and 

farming, and I had the best of both worlds’’; 

Whereas Feller attended Van Meter High School where he 

pitched for the baseball team; 

Whereas Feller, at the age of 17, joined the Cleveland Indians, where he played for 18 years, his entire career; 

Whereas Feller led the American League in wins 6 times; 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 703 ATS 

Whereas Feller led the American League in strikeouts 7 

times; 

Whereas Feller pitched 3 no-hitters, including the only Opening Day no-hitter, and shares the major league record 

with 12 one-hitters; 

Whereas Feller was an 8-time All-Star; 

Whereas Feller was a key member of the 1948 World Series 

Champion Cleveland Indians; 

Whereas Feller threw the second fastest pitch ever officially 

recorded, at 107.6 miles per hour; 

Whereas Feller ended his career with 266 victories and 2,581 

strikeouts; 

Whereas Feller remains the winningest pitcher in Cleveland 

Indians history; 

Whereas Feller was elected to the Baseball Hall of Fame in 

1962, his first year of eligibility; 

Whereas Feller enlisted in the Navy 2 days after the attack 

on Pearl Harbor in 1941; 

Whereas Feller served with valor in the Navy for nearly 4 

years, missing almost 4 full baseball seasons; 

Whereas Feller was stationed aboard the U.S.S. Alabama as 

a gunnery specialist; 

Whereas Feller earned 8 battle stars and was discharged in 

late 1945; and 

Whereas Bob Feller, one of the greatest baseball players of 

all time, placed service to his country ahead of all else: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 703 ATS 

1 (1) honors Bob Feller for transcending the 

2 sport of baseball in service to the United States and 

3 the cause of democracy and freedom in World War 

4 II; 

5 (2) recognizes Bob Feller as one of the greatest 

6 baseball players of all time; and 

7 (3) extends its deepest condolences to the fam8 ily of Bob Feller. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
# C_2019024EN.01000102.xml

| 21.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9060 — HP/Apogee)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 24/02)

On 22 October 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9060. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9060. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
#### State v. Devine

108,947

08/20/2015

Denied

Unpublished
|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                       
|View History:                                                        
|                                                                     
|Idaho Natural Gas Industrial Price  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                     
|                                                                     
|Idaho Natural Gas Industrial Price  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                     

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 2.76   | 3.09   | 3.29  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 4.02   | 6.43   | 6.90   | 5.90   | 6.97   | 8.39   | 10.05  | 9.39   | 9.18   | 8.53  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 6.39   | 6.36   | 5.73   | 5.47   | 5.96   | 5.72   | 5.19   | 4.44   | 3.98   | 3.60  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 3.67   | 3.88   | 5.06   | 6.65   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
From: "Palazzolo, Michael A." <Michael.Palazzolo@alcoa.com>

To: Rochelle Boyd/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 10/21/2010 01:55 PM

Subject: RE: Primary Aluminum

Rochelle,

Both of these plants are idled with active Title V permits. Lots of folks at these 

locations hoping the economy turns around soon.

Mike

Michael Palazzolo

Alcoa, Inc.

201 Isabella Street

Pittsburgh, PA 15212-5858

Ph: 412-553-4832

___________________________________________________

From: Boyd.Rochelle@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Boyd.Rochelle@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 1:46 PM

To: Palazzolo, Michael A.

Subject: Primary Aluminum

Are the plants in Alcoa, TN and Rockdale, TX permanently closed or just idle with active Title V permits?

Rochelle Boyd, Environmental Engineer

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

Sector Policies and Programs Division

109 T.W. Alexander Drive, RTP, NC 27711

Mail Drop D243-02

Ph: (919) 541-1390 Fax: (919) 541-3207

Email: boyd.rochelle@epa.gov
ANDREW A. ROMERO,

Appellant,

v.

REEMPLOYMENT 

ASSISTANCE APPEALS 

COMMISSION and FEDEX 

GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, 

INC.,

Appellees.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D17-2160

_____________________________/

Opinion filed December 13, 2017.

An appeal from an order of the Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission.

Andrew A. Romero, pro se, Appellant.

Norman A. Blessing, General Counsel, and Cristina A. Velez, Appellate Counsel,

Tallahassee for Appellee Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission.

PER CURIAM.

Andrew A. Romero appeals from a final order of the Reemployment 

Assistance Appeals Commission that disqualified him from unemployment benefits 
2

for having made fraudulent representations for the purpose of obtaining benefits, 

established the amount of benefits he was overpaid, and assessed a fifteen percent 

fraud penalty to the amount of overpayment. Despite Romero’s arguments to the 

contrary, there is competent, substantial evidence in the record demonstrating that 

Romero fraudulently collected several months of benefits to which he was not 

entitled. However, as the Commission properly concedes, the record does not 

establish that Romero made fraudulent representations prior to the benefit week 

ending in June 20, 2015, even though he was overpaid for that time period because 

he had unreported earnings that rendered him eligible for only partial benefits. See

§ 443.036(44)(a), Fla. Stat. (2017) (one is “partially unemployed” in any week he or 

she works less than full time and earns less than his or her weekly benefit amount); 

§ 443.111(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (2017) (describing calculation for determining partial 

benefit payable to an individual who is partially unemployed in any week). 

Accordingly, we vacate the Commission’s order to the extent that it imposed the 

fifteen percent fraud penalty for the weeks prior to the benefit week ending June 20, 

2015, and remand for the adjustment of Romero’s overpayment for those weeks 

based on his entitlement to partial benefits. In all other respects, we affirm.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

WETHERELL, RAY, and WINOKUR, JJ., CONCUR.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7281

HAYWOOD WILLIAMS, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

WARDEN, FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION,

ALLENWOOD, PENNSYLVANIA; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF

VIRGINIA,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-98-931)

Submitted: January 31, 2000 Decided: February 15, 2000

Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINS, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Haywood Williams, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Susan Lynn Watt, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on

August 31, 1999, the district court’s records show that it was

entered on the docket sheet on September 2, 1999. Pursuant to

Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is

the date that the order was physically entered on the docket sheet

that we take as the effective date of the district court’s

decision. See Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir.

1986).

2

PER CURIAM:

Haywood Williams, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the

district court’s opinion adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Williams v. Warden, FCI Allenwood,

No. CA-98-931 (E.D. Va. Sept. 2, 1999).* We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### State v. Sprague

105,827

106,225

08/29/13

Denied.

Unpublished
|                                                                                          
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                            
|View History:                                                                             
|                                                                                          
|Percent of Industrial Natural Gas Deliveries in Kansas Represented by the Price  (Percent)
|                                                                                          
|                                                                                          
|Percent of Industrial Natural Gas Deliveries in Kansas Represented by the Price  (Percent)
|                                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 9.2    | 9.9    | 10.1  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 10.4   | 9.3    | 10.8   | 7.9    | 6.9    | 6.3    | 7.3    | 5.9    | 7.8    | 6.7   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 7.0    | 9.5    | 9.7    | 9.3    | 8.3    | 8.2    | 7.6    | 7.0    | 6.4    | 6.3   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 7.9    | 7.4    | 8.5    | 5.9    |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024