alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.42
 Alexza Pharmaceuticals, Inc.ID: 77-0567768Notice of Grant of Award
    
    2091 Stierlin Courtand Award Agreement
    
    Mountain View, CA 94043
 Name:
    
    Award Number:Address:
    
    Plan:
    
    
    2005
 
 
  Shares
    
    Full
VestBy your signature and the Companys signature below, you and the Company agree
that this award is granted under and governed by the terms and conditions of
the Companys Award Plan as amended and the Award Agreement, all of which are
attached and made a part of this document.Alexza Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
    
    DateName:
    
    Date




---



##### 



Alexza Pharmaceuticals, Inc.  2005 Equity Incentive Plan
 Stock Unit Award Agreement
   1. Vesting
 2. Dividends
 3. Evidence of Share Issuance
 4. Number of Shares
 5. Securities Law Compliance
 6. Restrictive Legends.
 7. Transferability.
 1.




---



##### 



8. Award not a Service Contract
 9. Unsecured Obligation
 10. Withholding Obligations.
 (a) [Such withholding obligations may be satisfied by your relinquishment of your right to receive a
portion of the shares otherwise issuable to you in respect of vested Stock Units pursuant to the
Award; provided, however, that you shall not be authorized to relinquish your right to shares with
a fair market value in excess of the amount required to satisfy the minimum amount of tax required
to be withheld by law.]
 (b)
 11. Notices
 12. Headings .
 13. Amendment . provided, however
 2.




---



##### 



14. Miscellaneous.
 (a)
 (b)
 (c)
 15. Governing Plan Document
 16. Choice of Law .
 3.
### Faulk, Scott (OST)
From: Sent: To: Subject: Brianna Tangonan <briannat@hawaii.edu> Thursday, November 28, 2013 4:23 PM Faulk, Scott (OST) Department of Transportation

DearDepartment ofTransportation,

I have beenflying Mokulele for over 6 years, and I amwriting to support Mokulele Airlines 4-year bid link Kaulapapa, Kahalui, Honolulu, Kapalua, and Ho'olehua. Mokulele will be the best candidate as they have the lowerfares, experienced friendly agents, frequent flights, mulitple islands and ease ofbooking. Itis important we have safe, stable and affordable service to Kalaupapa.

Please select Mokulele to serve Kalaupapa for 4 years.

Mahalo, BriannaTangonan

1
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 68 (Wednesday, April 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 17276]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-8982]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster #2937, Amdt. 3]


State of Tennessee

    In accordance with a notice from the Federal Emergency Management 
Agency, dated March 24, 1997, the above-numbered Declaration is hereby 
amended to establish the incident period for this disaster as beginning 
on February 28, 1997 and continuing through March 24, 1997.
    All other information remains the same, i.e., the termination date 
for filing applications for physical damage is May 6, 1997, and for 
loans for economic injury the deadline is December 8, 1997.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008.)

    Dated: March 31, 1997.
Bernard Kulik,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 97-8982 Filed 4-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
EXHIBIT 31.1

Certification

I, William F. Ritzmann, President and Chief Executive Officer of United Community
Bancorp, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of United Community Bancorp;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying
officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: September 26, 2006



/s/ William F. RitzmannWilliam F. RitzmannPresident and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>   1



                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1


                          INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLANS


     The Company and its subsidiaries provide annual incentive compensation
through a bonus plan maintained for most salaried personnel.  The bonus plan
directly links incentive pay to achievement of predetermined, objective
performance goals.  For employees employed directly by the holding company,
incentive pay is based on return on beginning shareholders' equity.  For
employees employed by an operating subsidiary, incentive pay is based on
pre-tax earnings, as adjusted for that subsidiary, as a percentage of beginning
capital employed.  Except for a limited number of senior management persons at
Harris Teeter, for whom incentive pay is based on pre-tax earnings, as adjusted
for Harris Teeter, as a percentage of beginning capital employed, the salaried
personnel at Harris Teeter, Inc. are paid an incentive based on operating
profit as a percentage of sales.  If the Company, or a subsidiary, as
applicable, achieves the predetermined minimum goals, employees are paid a
predetermined percentage of base compensation as incentive.  The percentage of
base compensation payable as incentive compensation increases proportionally
until a maximum performance goal is achieved with respect to the applicable
measure of performance.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OFINDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatement on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-91160 and 333-74842) of Lawson Software, Inc. of our report datedAugust 28, 2006 relating to the financial statements, management’s assessmentof the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears inthis Form 10-K.

 
|  | /s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP |   |
|--|--------------------------------|--------|

Minneapolis, Minnesota

August 28, 2006

----
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT (23)

                            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
                         CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

The Rowe Companies
McLean, Virginia

   We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our reports dated
January 4, 2002, except for Note 6 which is as of March 5, 2002, relating to
the consolidated financial statements and schedule of The Rowe Companies
appearing in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 2, 2001 into the Company's previously filed registration statements
file numbers 2-94943, 33-90486, 33-77766, 33-77768 and 333-82571.

                                                   /s/  BDO SEIDMAN, LLP
                                                   ____________________________
                                                    BDO Seidman, LLP

High Point, North Carolina
March 5, 2002
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 646 

Designating Thursday, November 18, 2010, as ‘‘Feed America Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 24, 2010 

Mr. HATCH (for himself, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. BENNETT, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. CRAPO, 

Mr. CASEY, Mr. COCHRAN, and Mr. LEAHY) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

SEPTEMBER 28, 2010 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating Thursday, November 18, 2010, as ‘‘Feed 

America Day’’. 

Whereas Thanksgiving Day celebrates the spirit of selfless 

giving and an appreciation for family and friends; 

Whereas the spirit of Thanksgiving Day is a virtue upon 

which the United States was founded; 

Whereas, according to the Department of Agriculture, roughly 35,000,000 people in the United States, including 

12,000,000 children, continue to live in households that 

do not have an adequate supply of food; and 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 646 ATS 

Whereas selfless sacrifice breeds a genuine spirit of thanksgiving, both affirming and restoring fundamental principles in our society: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates Thursday, November 18, 2010, 

3 as ‘‘Feed America Day’’; and 

4 (2) encourages the people of the United States 

5 to sacrifice 2 meals on Thursday, November 18, 

6 2010, and to donate the money that would have 

7 been spent on that food to the religious or charitable 

8 organization of their choice for the purpose of feed9 ing the hungry. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
#### State v. Charles

105,148

05/20/13

Granted. ...

Unpublished
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of Neonode Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “report”), the undersigned, Per Bystedt, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and David W. Brunton, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:





1.
The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Dated: May 12, 2010





/s/ Per Bystedt

/s/ David W. BruntonPer Bystedt

David W. BruntonChief Executive Officer

Chief Financial Officer





This certification accompanies the Form 10-K/A to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference to any filing of Neonode Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K/A), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
No. 126,

Orig.

#### Kansas *v.*Nebraska et al.

[For earlier order herein, see, *e. g.,*565 U. S. 1192.]

Motion of the Special Master for allowance of fees and disbursements granted, and the Special Master is awarded a total of $288,229.61 for the period January 1 through August 23, 2012, to be allocated among the States as follows: Kansas $115,291.84; Nebraska $115,291.84; and Colorado $57,645.93.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                          (2944)
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     3538
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  3538
<PP&E>                                          130516
<DEPRECIATION>                                (118018)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   77469
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2111545
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    1200000
<COMMON>                                        399431
<OTHER-SE>                                   (3633507)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     77469
<SALES>                                           5231
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 15231
<CGS>                                            11315
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   177324
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (81205)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (243298)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 71 (Monday, April 14, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 18108]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-9496]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP95-187-007]


Northwest Pipeline Corporation; Notice of Compliance Filing

April 8, 1997.
    Take notice that on April 3, 1997, Northwest Pipeline Corporation 
(Northwest) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Third 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheet, to become effective 
December 21, 1996:

1st Rev 2nd Sub Fourth Rev Sheet No. 231

    Northwest states that this filing is submitted in compliance with 
the Commission's March 24, 1997 Letter Order. Northwest states that the 
proposed tariff sheet revises the pagination of 2nd Sub Fourth Rev 
Sheet No. 231 filed by Northwest on November 20, 1996.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this 
filing are on file with the Commission and are available for Public 
inspection in the public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-9496 Filed 4-11-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
S95Y1224.

#### IN THE MATTER OF J. ROBERT BENTON.

(463 SE2d 129)

Per curiam.

After a grievance was filed with the State Bar of Georgia by the Investigative Panel of the State Disciplinary Board, J. Robert Benton filed a petition for voluntary surrender of his license to practice law in the State of Georgia. The grievance stated that Benton, in his “failure *833to account for funds held in a fiduciary capacity,” may have violated Standards 4 (engaging in professional conduct involving misrepresentation) and 65 (failing to account for money held in a fiduciary capacity).

Decided November 6, 1995.

*William P. Smith III, General Counsel State Bar, E. Duane Cooper, Assistant General Counsel State Bar,*for State Bar of Georgia.

Benton admitted conduct in violation of Standard 4 of Bar Rule 4-102 (d) by issuing letters as an attorney on his law firm stationery in which he stated that an investment arbitrage program known as the “Savage Program” was a legal enterprise. He admitted that the program was subsequently determined to be a fraudulent investment scheme and that by issuing the letters he engaged in professional conduct that resulted in misrepresentation.

The State Bar does not object to the voluntary surrender of Benton’s license, and the review panel has recommended that the petition be granted.

Having reviewed the record, we adopt the recommendation of the review panel and accept Benton’s petition for voluntary surrender of his license to practice law in the State of Georgia. A voluntary surrender is tantamount to disbarment, and Benton is reminded to take all steps necessary to protect his clients and to comply fully with State Bar Rule 4-219 (c).

*Voluntary surrender of license accepted.*

*All the Justices concur.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1997
<CASH>                                         197,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               12,986,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  9,487,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            24,953,000
<PP&E>                                      25,074,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,560,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              63,158,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       12,486,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    17,705,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,759,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                63,158,000
<SALES>                                     17,435,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            17,435,000
<CGS>                                       11,902,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,902,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,590,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             201,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,742,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   722,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,020,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,020,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .23
        

</TABLE>
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12** 
**- 2448** 

EDWARD BOWIE ,
Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.

HENDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT; JOHN DOE; JANE DOE ,
Defendants

– Appellees.

**No. 13** 
**- 1131** 

EDWARD BOWIE ,
Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.

HENDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT; JOHN DOE; JANE DOE ,
Defendants

– Appellees.

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Louise W. Flanagan , District Judge. ( 5:12

- cv
- 00514

- FL )

Submitted : May 2 3 , 2013 Decided: May 28, 20132 Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Edward Bowie, Appellant Pro Se. Kari Russwurm Johnson, CRANFILL, SUMNER & HARTZOG, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeal s , Edward Bowie appeals

the district court ’ s order s denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 (200 6 ) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Bowie v. Henderson Police Dep’t ,
No. 5:12

- cv
- 00514

- FL (E.D.N.C. Nov. 5, 2012 & Jan. 9, 2013) . We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
|                                                                       
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                         
|View History:                                                          
|                                                                       
|Georgia Natural Gas Industrial Price  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                       
|                                                                       
|Georgia Natural Gas Industrial Price  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 4.55   | 3.92   | 3.41  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 4.83   | 5.89   | 4.85   | 6.77   | 7.53   | 10.29  | 9.51   | 8.86   | 11.02  | 6.21  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 6.25   | 5.90   | 4.61   | 5.38   | 6.07   | 4.42   | 4.13   | 4.65   | 4.63   | 4.23  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 3.85   | 5.44   | 9.02   | 5.41   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024