alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1


Rule 13a-14(d) Certification





I, In-Young Chase, certify that:





1.           I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of MS Structured Asset Corp. on behalf of SATURNS Trust No. 2005-3;





2.           Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;





3.           Based on my knowledge the distribution or servicing information required to be provided to the depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;





4.           I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor and the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the Compliance Statement, the depositor and trustee have each fulfilled their obligations under that agreement; and





5.           The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the compliance by the trustee and the depositor with the minimum servicing or similar standards based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, that is included in these reports.





In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party:  U.S. Bank as successor-in-interest to Bank of America, National Association and its officers and agents.





By:          /s/ In-Young Chase
 Name:     In-Young Chase
 Title:       Vice President


Date:       March 26, 2013
No. 12-5861.

#### Stephens *v.*Bondi, Attorney General of Florida, et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 434 

Expressing support for Children’s Dental Health Month and honoring the 

memory of Deamonte Driver. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 4, 2010 

Mr. CARDIN (for himself, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mr. ROCKEFELLER, 

and Ms. MIKULSKI) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for Children’s Dental Health Month and 

honoring the memory of Deamonte Driver. 

Whereas several national dental organizations have observed 

February 2010 as Children’s Dental Health Month; 

Whereas Deamonte Driver, a 12-year-old Marylander, died on 

February 25, 2007, of complications resulting from untreated tooth decay; 

Whereas the passing of Deamonte Driver has led to increased 

awareness nationwide about the importance of access to 

high-quality, affordable preventative care and treatment 

for dental problems; 

Whereas the primary purpose of Children’s Dental Health 

Month is to educate parents, children, and the public 

about the importance and value of oral health; 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 434 ATS 

Whereas Children’s Dental Health Month showcases the overwhelmingly preventable nature of tooth decay and highlights the fact that tooth decay is on the rise among the 

youngest children in the Nation; 

Whereas Children’s Dental Health Month educates the public 

about the treatment of childhood dental caries, cleft-palate, oral facial trauma, and oral cancer through public 

service announcements, seminars, briefings, and the pro 

bono initiatives of practitioners and academic dental institutions; 

Whereas Children’s Dental Health Month was created to 

raise awareness about the importance of oral health; and 

Whereas Children’s Dental Health Month is an opportunity 

for the public and health professionals to take action to 

prevent childhood dental problems and improve access to 

high-quality dental care: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That Congress expresses support for Chil2 dren’s Dental Health Month and honors the life of 

3 Deamonte Driver. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
##### 





---



20-F/A (Amendment No. 1) 2002




---



Exhibit 23.3

Consent of Independent Public
Accountants

We hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8
(No. 333-7590) of Royal Dutch Petroleum Company and The
Shell Transport and Trading Company, Public Limited
Company of our report dated March 5, 2003, except for
Note 2 (Restatement of Previously Issued Financial
Statements), as to which the date is May 22, 2004, relating
to the Financial Statements of the Royal Dutch/ Shell Group of
Companies which is included in this Amendment No. 1.




|                          | 
|------------------------- | 
|/s/ KPMG Accountants N.V. | 

------------------------------------------------------------


KPMG Accountants N.V.

The Hague




|                               | 
|------------------------------ | 
|/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP | 

------------------------------------------------------------


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

London


June 25, 2004



E4 Exhibits
# C_2019428EN.01004301.xml

| 20.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 428/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 428/43

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9701 — InfraVia/Iliad/Iliad 73)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 428/10)

1.

On 13 December 2019, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Iliad S.A. (‘Iliad’, France), |
| --- | --- |

—

Iliad S.A. (‘Iliad’, France),

| — | InfraVia Capital Partners (‘InfraVia’, France). |
| --- | --- |

—

InfraVia Capital Partners (‘InfraVia’, France).

Iliad and InfraVia acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of newly created joint venture.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares in a newly created company constituting a joint venture.

2.

| — | for Iliad: provision of fixed and mobile telephony services, internet access and hosting services, |
| --- | --- |

—

for Iliad: provision of fixed and mobile telephony services, internet access and hosting services,

| — | for InfraVia: management of investment funds specialised in the infrastructure sector, |
| --- | --- |

—

for InfraVia: management of investment funds specialised in the infrastructure sector,

| — | for the joint venture: provision of wholesale local access at a fixed location in France. |
| --- | --- |

—

for the joint venture: provision of wholesale local access at a fixed location in France.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

2

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9701 — InfraVia/Iliad/Iliad 73

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTH PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          80,240
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,710,051
<ALLOWANCES>                                   100,000
<INVENTORY>                                  5,520,020
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,235,450
<PP&E>                                      10,352,381
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,032,208
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,758,648
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,887,892
<BONDS>                                      5,134,734
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        70,462
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,665,560
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,758,648
<SALES>                                     15,542,691
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,974,540
<CGS>                                       13,002,584
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               13,002,584
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,557,123
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             380,762
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 34,071
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             23,071
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    23,071
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00


</TABLE>
Hoii.George W. Cox, W. D.

state H<li Officer Austin, Texas

Dear Sir: OpinionNo. 0-1.562 Re: Whether $4.00 per day llmltatlon
on traveling expensesprovidedby rider to departmental approprlatlon bill applies to trip by-State Health Officer to Washington, D;C., at request of Federal offlclals, expenses of such trip to be pald out of funds allocated to the State of Texas by the Children's Bureau of the Federal Government.
This will acknowledgereceipt of your letter of October 6; 1939;wherel.nyou advise that you have been requested. by Miss Katharine F:'Lenroot, Chief'of the Children'sBureau, and by Surgeon General Thomas Parran' of the United States PublicHealth Service, to come to~washington,D. C., for the purpose.

of studyingplans, rules and regulations for the ad-- mlnFstratFon of health affairs and moneys allocated to Texas, and that you have been advised by' Miss Lenroot that your expenses ~111 be paid out of funds allocated to the State of Texas by the Children'sBureau.

You desire the opinion of this department upon the followingquestion:

"Pleaseadvise me if expenses incurred on a trip.toWashlcgton, onofficial business, ~111 be limited to $4.00 per day, or will the expenses incident theretobe limited to actual'expenses if paid out of funds allocated to the Health Department of the State of Texas by the United States PublicHealth Service. or the ChlldrenVsBureau."

Your question is not one which can be gZven a categorical answer, upon the basis of the information contalned inyour letter. The answer to your question depenas upon the facts as to whether or not, in allocating funds to the State of Texas by the Children'sBureau, the Federal government has made an unrestricted grant of such~funas ln,suchmanner as to constitute the funds "Statefunds," subject to theHon. GeorgeW. Cox, M. D., page 2 o-1562

complete control of~theLeglslatldn of the State of Textis. If this be the sltuation,~theexpenses incurredby you on your trlp,toWashington,'6n official business,would.bi ~lmlted to $4.00 per d&y, in accordancewith the rider appended-to the departmentalappropflatlonbill. On the other hi%na, if the condition of th& grailtto the State of Texas by the Children'sBureau was'that the expenditureof such Federal funds should be subject to the control of the 'proper'Fed&al authbPltle&, or the grant at the'tlme itwas made'prescrlbed the use that might be made of such funds in respect to traveling expenses authorized to be paid therefrom, such ". fundswould be received and retained by the State of Texas" impressedwith the trust, and the exp&nilture~of 's;uch:~fUiiis Would be controlledby the Federal regulations, rather than by our State laws.

Yours very truly

ATTORNEYGENERAL OF TEXAS

By s/R.W. Fairchild R. w. FaiPChlla
RWF:pbp:wc

APPROVED OCT ‘~23, 1939 s/Gerald C. Mann ATTORNEYGENERAL OF TE?3S
Approved Opinion CommitteeBy s/BWB Chalrman
**AD Economic Evaluation**



### Docket No . FAA

- 20 15

- 3657 Directorate ID : 2012

- SW

- 069

- AD Helicopter Model: Airbus Helicopters (Previously Eurocopter France) Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 133 Helicopters in the US Registry

. Reason : The actions of this AD are intended to prevent damage to the bearing resulting in end play, loss of tail rotor pitch control, and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.
Costs : Parts per Helicopter $ 565 to replace the control shaft guide bushes, $30,000 to replace the TGB and $24,000 to overhaul the TGB to replace the bearing. Labor per Helicopter $85 per work hour ( 1 work hour to check the TGB oil level and magnetic plug inspection , 3 work hours to measure the play in the TGB control shaft and rod assembly, 4 work hours to replace the TGB control shaft guide bush, and 6 work hours to inspect the TGB control shaft and rod assembly for steel particles ) Inspecting the TGB control shaft and rod assy for steel particles = 6 work hours $ 85 for inspections $ 255 to measure play $ 3 4 0 to replace TGB bushes $ 510 to inspect for steel particles

Other (Explain) $30,000 to replace the TGB if necessary $24,000 to overhaul the TGB to replace the bearings if necessary Total Cost per Heli copter $ 86 to inspect oil level and magnetic plug for chips $255 to measure the play $905 to replace the control shaft guide bushes $510 to inspect the TGB control shaft and rod assy Total US Fleet Cost $ 11,438 to check oil level and magnetic plug $ 33,915 to measure the play $120,365 to replace the TGB guide bushes $ 67,830 to inspect the TGB control shaft and rod assy for steel particles Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  )2

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory Flexibility Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer : Fname Lname
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 630 

Designating November 28, 2010, as ‘‘Drive Safer Sunday’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 20, 2010 

Mr. ISAKSON (for himself, Mr. CHAMBLISS, and Ms. KLOBUCHAR) submitted 

the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating November 28, 2010, as ‘‘Drive Safer Sunday’’. 

Whereas motor vehicle travel is the primary means of transportation in the United States; 

Whereas every individual traveling on the roads and highways 

needs to drive in a safer manner in order to reduce 

deaths and injuries that result from motor vehicle accidents; 

Whereas according to the National Highway Traffic Safety 

Administration, wearing a seat belt saves more than 

15,000 lives each year; 

Whereas the Senate wants all people of the United States to 

understand the life-saving importance of wearing a seat 

belt and encourages motorists to drive safely, not just 

during the holiday season, but every time they get behind 

the wheel; and 


SMARTINEZ on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 630 ATS 

Whereas the Sunday after Thanksgiving is the busiest highway traffic day of the year: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) encourages— 

3 (A) high schools, colleges, universities, ad4 ministrators, teachers, primary schools, and 

5 secondary schools to launch campus-wide edu6 cational campaigns to urge students to be fo7 cused on safety when driving; 

8 (B) national trucking firms to alert their 

9 drivers to be especially focused on driving safely 

10 on the Sunday after Thanksgiving, and to pub11 licize the importance of the day through use of 

12 Citizen’s Band (‘‘CB’’) radios and truck stops 

13 across the Nation; 

14 (C) clergy to remind their members to 

15 travel safely when attending services and gath16 erings; 

17 (D) law enforcement personnel to remind 

18 drivers and passengers to drive safely, particu19 larly on the Sunday after Thanksgiving; and 

20 (E) all people of the United States to use 

21 the Sunday after Thanksgiving as an oppor22 tunity to educate themselves about highway 

23 safety; and 


SMARTINEZ on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 630 ATS 

1 (2) designates November 28, 2010, as ‘‘Drive 

2 Safer Sunday’’. 

Æ 


SMARTINEZ on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
No. 12-5878.

#### Imperial *v.*Herndon, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
NOTICE OF CONVERSION

To:     Citadel Security Software Inc.



I, Kenneth Schnitzer, hereby elect to convert $225,000 principal of my
Promissory Note and interest accrued upon such principal amount through April
23, 2003 of $6,668.49 into 243,862 shares of Common Stock (the "Shares") of
Citadel Security Software Inc. (the "Company") at a conversion price of $0.95
per share.

I understand that the shares issued are restricted and that the certificate
representing the shares shall be imprinted with a legend as required under
applicable federal and state securities laws, until the registration statement
that the Company proposes to file covering the shares is effective.

I am delivering this Notice and the Promissory Note to the Company. Please issue
a certificate representing the Shares in my name and to the address specified
below.

Signed:  /s/ Kenneth Schnitzer               Date:  April 23, 2003
Name:    Kenneth Schnitzer
Address:
         -----------------------------

         -----------------------------


<PAGE>
# US

Comparison of coal production by quarter at U.S. total  levelshort tons

# IN

Comparison of coal production by quarter for Indianashort tons

# IL

Comparison of coal production by quarter for Illinoisshort tons

# KY

Comparison of coal production by quarter for Kentuckyshort tons

# EKY

Comparison of coal production by quarter for East Kentuckyshort tons

# WKY

Comparison of coal production by quarter for West Kentuckyshort tons

# WV

Comparison of coal production by quarter for West Virginiashort tons

# SWV

Comparison of coal production by quarter for South West Virginiashort tons

# NWV

Comparison of coal production by quarter for North West Virginiashort tons

# PA

Comparison of coal production by quarter for Pennsylvaniashort tons

# PAA

Comparison of coal production by quarter for Pennsylvania (anthracite)short tons

# PAB

Comparison of coal production by quarter for Pennsylvania (bituminous)short tons

# OH

Comparison of coal production by quarter for Ohioshort tons

# MD

Comparison of coal production by quarter for Marylandshort tons

# WY

Comparison of coal production by quarter for Wyomingshort tons

# MT

Comparison of coal production by quarter for Montanashort tons

# VA

Comparison of coal production by quarter for Virginiashort tons

# UT

Comparison of coal production by quarter for Utahshort tons

# ND

Comparison of coal production by quarter for North Dakotashort tons

# NM

Comparison of coal production by quarter for New Mexicoshort tons

# CO

Comparison of coal production by quarter for Coloradoshort tons

# TX

Comparison of coal production by quarter for Texasshort tons

# AL

Comparison of coal production by quarter for Alabamashort tons

# AK

Comparison of coal production by quarter for Alaskashort tons

# LA

Comparison of coal production by quarter for Louisianashort tons

# MS

Comparison of coal production by quarter for Mississippishort tons

# MO

Comparison of coal production by quarter for Missourishort tons

# OK

Comparison of coal production by quarter for Oklahomashort tons

# TN

Comparison of coal production by quarter for Tennesseeshort tons

# AR

Comparison of coal production by quarter for Arkansasshort tons

# KS

Comparison of coal production by quarter for Kansasshort tons

# AZ

Comparison of coal production by quarter for Arizonashort tons
```

                                  Exhibit 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.ss.1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss.1350),
the undersigned, Warren G. Lichtenstein, President and Chief Executive Officer
of WebFinancial Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby
certify, to his knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 of the
Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

                                          /s/ Warren G. Lichtenstein
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          Warren G. Lichtenstein
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer
                                          March 26, 2003
```
#### State v. Magallanez

106,255

08/19/13

Denied.

Unpublished
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 589 

To authorize the printing of a revised edition of the Nomination and Election 

of the President and Vice President of the United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 21, 2010 

Mr. SCHUMER (for himself and Mr. BENNETT) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

To authorize the printing of a revised edition of the Nomination and Election of the President and Vice President 

of the United States. 

1 Resolved, That— 

2 (1) the Committee on Rules and Administration 

3 shall prepare a revised edition of the document enti4 tled Nomination and Election of the President and 

5 Vice President of the United States (Senate Docu6 ment 106-16); 

7 (2) the revised document described in para8 graph (1) shall be printed as a Senate document; 

9 and 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 589 ATS 

1 (3) there shall be printed, beyond the usual 

2 number, 600 additional copies of the revised docu3 ment described in paragraph (1) for the use of the 

4 Committee on Rules and Administration. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
# m94_32