alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32(b)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

          In connection with the Annual Report of Watermark Investors Realty
Trust (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, David S. Givner, Principal Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


          A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its
staff upon request.







Date:  March 29, 2006                      /s/ David S. Givner
                                           -------------------
                                           David S. Givner
                                           Principal Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 69 (Thursday, April 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17606-17607]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-9272]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-310-000]


Garden Banks Gas Pipeline, LLC.; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

April 4, 1997.
    Take notice that on April 1, 1997, Garden Banks Gas Pipeline, LLC 
(GBGP) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original 
Volume No. 1, the pro forma Tariff sheets set forth on Appendix B to 
the filing in compliance with the Commission's Order No. 587, to become 
effective June 1, 1997.
    On July 17, 1996, the Commission issued Order No. 587 which revised 
its regulations governing interstate natural gas pipelines to require 
such pipelines to follow standardized business practices issued by the 
Gas Industry Standards Board (GISB) and adopted by the Commission. 18 
CFR Sec. 284.10(b). The standards govern certain aspects of the 
following practices of natural gas pipelines: nominations, allocations, 
balancing, measurement, invoicing, and capacity release. In Docket Nos. 
CP96-678-000 and CP96-679-000, GBGP was directed to file GISB complaint 
pro forma Tariff sheets within 60 days of implementation.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with 18 CFR Sections 385.211 and 385.214 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations.

[[Page 17607]]

All such motions and protests must be filed by April 21, 1997. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion 
to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-9272 Filed 4-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# C_2019315EN.01000101.xml

| 19.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 315/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 315/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9431 — KKR/Grupo Gallardo Balboa)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 315/01)

On 16 August 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9431. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9431. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Filed 3/13/19 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2019 ND 63

Jose Alfredo Medina Gonzales, Appellant

v.

Workforce Safety and Insurance, Appellee

No. 20180365

Appeal from the District Court of Williams County, Northwest Judicial

District, the Honorable Paul W. Jacobson, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Stephen D. Little, Bismarck, N.D., for appellant.

Douglas W. Gigler, Special Assistant Attorney General, Fargo, N.D., for

appellee.
Gonzales v. WSI

No. 20180365

Per curiam.

[¶1] Jose Gonzales appeals a district court judgment that affirms an Administrative

Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) order affirming a Workforce Safety and Insurance (“WSI”)

administrative order denying Gonzales any compensation for his injury. The

administrative order found Gonzales was not at work the day he claimed he was

injured. Gonzales argues the ALJ wrongly found WSI’s evidence to be more

persuasive than his evidence. He also argues the ALJ should have permitted the

testimony of his coworker instead of excluding it under the “newly discovered

evidence” rule. We conclude the ALJ made no reversible error of law and the findings

are supported by a preponderance of the evidence. We summarily affirm the district

court judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(5).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Jerod E. Tufte

Daniel J. Crothers

Lisa Fair McEvers

Jon J. Jensen

1
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 23

- 00201

- CV

IN RE U.S. BANK, N.A., AS TRUSTEE, SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO

WACHOVIA BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE,

SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK AS

TRUSTEE FOR MID

- STATE TRUST X

Original Proceeding

From the County Court

Navarro County, Texas

Trial Court No. CV

- 10332

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The original filing fee for this proceeding has not been paid.

By letter dated Ju ly 13 , 2023, the Clerk of this Court notified R elato r that the filing

fee was past due and that unless R elator obtained indigent status pursuant to Texas Rule

of Civil Procedure 145 and Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 20.1, the payment of the

fee wa s required. In the same letter, the Clerk warned R elator that if the original filing

fee was not paid within 21 day s from the date of the letter, the proceeding would be

dismissed. Twenty

- one days have passed

, and the filing fee has not been paid.In re U.S. Bank, N.A Page 2 Accordingly, this proceeding is dismissed. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(c).

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justi ce Gray,

Justice Johnson, and

Justice Smith

Petition dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed August 30 , 2023

[OT06]
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 52 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 52

       Designating March 2, 2009, as ``Read Across America Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 23, 2009

    Mr. Reed (for himself and Ms. Collins) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
       Designating March 2, 2009, as ``Read Across America Day''.

Whereas reading is a basic requirement for quality education and professional 
        success, and is a source of pleasure throughout life;
Whereas the people of the United States must be able to read if the United 
        States is to remain competitive in the global economy;
Whereas Congress, through the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (Public Law 107-
        110) and the Reading First, Early Reading First, and Improving Literacy 
        Through School Libraries programs, has placed great emphasis on reading 
        intervention and providing additional resources for reading assistance; 
        and
Whereas more than 50 national organizations concerned about reading and 
        education have joined with the National Education Association to use 
        March 2, the anniversary of the birth of Theodor Geisel, also known as 
        Dr. Seuss, to celebrate reading: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates March 2, 2009, as ``Read Across America 
        Day'';
            (2) honors Theodor Geisel, also known as Dr. Seuss, for his 
        success in encouraging children to discover the joy of reading;
            (3) honors the 12th anniversary of Read Across America Day;
            (4) encourages parents to read with their children for at 
        least 30 minutes on Read Across America Day in honor of the 
        commitment of the Senate to building a Nation of readers; and
            (5) encourages the people of the United States to observe 
        the day with appropriate ceremonies and activities.
                                 <all>
```
Welcome to the U.S. Energy Information Administration's Energy Efficiency Web Site. 
If you are having trouble, call 202-586-8800 for help.Home > Energy 
            Users >Energy 
            Efficiency Page >Carbon Emissions in the Paper Industry


Carbon Emissions 
        in the Paper IndustryThe Industry at a Glance, 
            1994(SIC Code: 26)Total Energy-Related 
            Emissions: 31.6 million metric tons of carbon (MMTC)
                 -- Pct. of All Manufacturers: 8.5%Total First Use of Energy: 
            2,665 trillion Btu
                 -- Pct. of All Manufacturers: 12.3%
                 -- Pct. Renewable Energy: 47.7%Carbon Intensity: 11.88 
            MMTC per quadrillion BtuRenewable Energy Sources 
            (no net emissions):
                 -- Pulping liquor: 882 trillion Btu
                 -- Wood chips and bark: 389 trillion 
            Btu Energy Information Administration, "1994 Manufacturing 
            Energy Consumption Survey" and Emissions of Greenhouse Gases in 
            the United States 1998

Energy-Related 
            Carbon Emissions, 1994Source 
            of Carbon
          Carbon 
            Emissions
            (million metric tons)All 
            Energy Sources
          31.6Net 
            Electricity
          11.0Natural 
            Gas
          8.3Coal
          7.8Residual 
            Fuel Oil
          3.7All 
            Other Sources
          0.9Energy Information Administration, "1994 Manufacturing Energy Consumption 
            Survey" and Emissions of Greenhouse Gases in the United States 
            1998Energy-Related 
        Carbon Emissions for Selected Paper Industries, 1994.Paper and paperboard mills emit over 80 percent of the energy-related 
        carbon in the paper industry. Emissions for Selected Paper Industries
      Energy-Related 
        Carbon Emissions for the Paper Industry by Source, 1994. Electricity, 
        natural gas, and coal account for most of the energy-related carbon emissions 
        in the paper industry. Nearly half of the energy used in the paper industry 
        is renewable, consisting of wood and paper byproducts (pulping liquor, 
        wood chips, and bark). Renewable energy sources are not considered net 
        emitters of carbon. Emissions for the Paper Industry by Source
      [Energy-Related 
          Carbon Emissions in Manufacturing]
      
      Contact:
        Stephanie 
          Battles
        Stephanie.Battles@eia.doe.gov
        (Phone: 
          (202) 586-7237)
        FAX: 
          202-586-0018**Contact Us**
	  
      URL: http://www.eia.gov/emeu/efficiency/carbon_emissions/paper.html 
      File 
        Last Modified: May 31, 2000
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1256 

Supporting President Trump’s efforts to ensure that every legal vote is 

counted in the November 2020 Presidential election and to investigate 

and bring to justice those who perpetrate election fraud. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 10, 2020 

Mr. BUCK (for himself, Mr. DUNCAN, and Mr. BIGGS) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting President Trump’s efforts to ensure that every 

legal vote is counted in the November 2020 Presidential 

election and to investigate and bring to justice those 

who perpetrate election fraud. 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports President Trump’s efforts to en3 sure that every legal vote is counted in the Novem4 ber 2020 Presidential election; and 

5 (2) supports President Trump’s efforts to inves6 tigate and bring to justice those who perpetrate elec7 tion fraud. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF LAWSON SOFTWARE, INC
As of May 31, 2009

Subsidiary Corporation

JurisdictionLawson Software Americas, Inc.

DelawareLawson Software USA, Inc., subsidiary of Lawson Software, Inc.

DelawareLawson Technologies, Inc., subsidiary of Lawson Software, Inc.

DelawareAccount4, Inc., subsidiary of Lawson Software, Inc.

DelawareApexion Technologies, Inc

DelawareClosedloop Solutions, Inc.

DelawareComputer Assessment Systems LLC

DelawareLawson PLM, LLC

DelawareLawson Software, Inc.

DelawareLawson WFM, LLC

DelawareLawson Software Africa (Proprietary) Ltd.

AfricaVoto Pty Ltd

AustraliaLawson Software Australia Pty. Ltd.

AustraliaLawson Software Services Pty. Ltd.

AustraliaLawson Software Austria EDVBeratungs Gesm.b.h.

AustriaIntentia Consulting do Brzail Ltda.

BrazilLawson Software Shanghai Software Technology Co. Ltd.

ChinaIntentia CZ a.s.

Czech RepublicLawson Software Danmark A/S

DenmarkLawson Software Research and Development A/S

DenmarkLawson Software Ltd.

EnglandLawson Software Finland Oy

FinlandKeyola Corporation

FloridaLawson Software France SARL

FranceLawson Software Consulting France SAS

FranceLawson Software Deutschland GmbH

GermanyLawson Software GmbHformer Lawson

GermanyLawson Software Ireland Ltd.

IrelandLawson Software Consulting Italy SRL

ItalyLawson Software Japan K K

JapanLawson Americas Mexico, S. DE R.L. DE C.V.

MexicoLawson Software Mexico, S. dr R.L. de C.V.

MexicoLawson Software Benelux B.V.

NetherlandsLawson Software Netherlands B.V

NetherlandsLawson Software New Zealand Ltd.

New ZealandLawson Software Norge AS

NorwayLawson Philippines Support Center

PhilippinesLawson Software Polska Sp.z o.o.

PolandIntentia Consulting Portugal Informática SA

PortugalLawson Software Asia Pacific Pte Ltd.

SingaporeLawson Software Consulting S.A.U.

SpainLawson International AB

SwedenLawson Software Research and Development AB (not active)

SwedenKällvex AB

SwedenLawson International ABBranch Switzerland

SwedenLawson Software Sweden AB

SwedenLawson Software (Switzerland) Vaud Sarl

SwitzerlandLawson Software Finance SA

SwitzerlandLawson Software Switzerland A.G.

SwitzerlandLawson Software Limited

United KingdomMINORITY OWNED SUBSIDIARIESLawson Software Thailand Co. Ltd.

ThailandScase AS

Norway


---
#### State v. McKinney

108,009

08/30/13

Denied. ...

Unpublished
#### COM. v. BENOIT, A.

479 WDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/06/2017

CP-63-CR-0000261-2015

(Washington)

Affirmed
#### State v. Jefferson

111,643

111,644

07/22/2015

Denied

Unpublished
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 457 

To provide for issuance of a summons and for related procedures concerning 

the articles of impeachment against G. Thomas Porteous, Jr. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 17, 2010 

Mr. REID (for himself and Mr. MCCONNELL) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

To provide for issuance of a summons and for related procedures concerning the articles of impeachment against 

G. Thomas Porteous, Jr. 

1 Resolved, That a summons shall be issued which com2 mands G. Thomas Porteous, Jr. to file with the Secretary 

3 of the Senate an answer to the articles of impeachment 

4 no later than April 7, 2010, and thereafter to abide by, 

5 obey, and perform such orders, directions, and judgments 

6 as the Senate shall make in the premises, according to 

7 the Constitution and laws of the United States. 

8 SEC. 2. The Sergeant at Arms is authorized to utilize 

9 the services of the Deputy Sergeant at Arms or another 

10 employee of the Senate in serving the summons. 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 457 ATS 

1 SEC. 3. The Secretary shall notify the House of Rep2 resentatives of the filing of the answer and shall provide 

3 a copy of the answer to the House. 

4 SEC. 4. The Managers on the part of the House may 

5 file with the Secretary of the Senate a replication no later 

6 than April 21, 2010. 

7 SEC. 5. The Secretary shall notify counsel for G. 

8 Thomas Porteous, Jr. of the filing of a replication, and 

9 shall provide counsel with a copy. 

10 SEC. 6. The Secretary shall provide the answer and 

11 the replication, if any, to the Presiding Officer of the Sen12 ate on the first day the Senate is in session after the Sec13 retary receives them, and the Presiding Officer shall cause 

14 the answer and replication, if any, to be printed in the 

15 Senate Journal and in the Congressional Record. If a 

16 timely answer has not been filed, the Presiding Officer 

17 shall cause a plea of not guilty to be entered. 

18 SEC. 7. The articles of impeachment, the answer, and 

19 the replication, if any, together with the provisions of the 

20 Constitution on impeachment, and the Rules of Procedure 

21 and Practice in the Senate When Sitting on Impeachment 

22 Trials, shall be printed under the direction of the Sec23 retary as a Senate document. 

24 SEC. 8. The provisions of this resolution shall govern 

25 notwithstanding any provisions to the contrary in the 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

SRES 457 ATS 

1 Rules of Procedure and Practice in the Senate When Sit2 ting on Impeachment Trials. 

3 SEC. 9. The Secretary shall notify the House of Rep4 resentatives of this resolution. 

Æ 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER



PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, B. Francis Saul II, the Trustee, Chairman of the Board of B.F. Saul Real Estate Investment Trust (the Trust), has executed this certification in connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange
Commission of the Trusts Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending September 30, 2004 (the Report). The undersigned hereby certifies that:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.



|                        |  |                                                  
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: December 16, 2005 |  | /s/ B. FRANCIS SAUL II                           
|                        |  | B. Francis Saul II Trustee, Chairman of the Board



---

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Stephen R. Halpin, Jr., the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of B.F. Saul Real Estate Investment Trust (the Trust), has executed
this certification in connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Trusts Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending September 30, 2004 (the Report). The undersigned hereby certifies
that:



(1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Trust.



|                        |  |                                                                  
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: December 16, 2005 |  | /s/ STEPHEN R. HALPIN, JR.                                       
|                        |  | Stephen R. Halpin, Jr. Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
ISAAC COOPER
,
Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Respondent. ___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

C ASE NO. 1D 14

- 5755

Opinion filed March 5, 2015.

Petition for Belated Appeal

-- Original Jurisdiction

. M. Blair Payne, Public Defender, and John M. Hendrick, Assistant Public Defender, Live Oak , for Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, an d Kristen Lynn Bonjour, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner is granted a belated appeal of the October 6, 2014, judgment and

sentence in Suwannee County Circuit Court case number 13

- 0362

- CF. Upon issuance

o f mandate in this cause, a copy of this opinion shall be provided to the clerk of thecircuit court for treatment as the notice of appeal. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)( 6 )(D).

If petitioner qualifies for appointed counsel, the trial court shall appoint co unsel to

represent petitioner on appeal.

LEWIS, C.J., BENTON and THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.

2