alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

KENNETH BERNARD HALL,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-3318

[February 28, 2019]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Ilona Maxine Holmes, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 05-11281CF10A.

Kenneth Bernard Hall, Okeechobee, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, DAMOORGIAN and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                      Exhibit 23
                                                                      ----------

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Forms S-8 (No. 33-44802 and 333-36046) of Royal Appliance Mfg. Co.
of our report dated February 8, 2001 relating to the financial statements, which
appears in the Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of
our report dated February 8, 2001 relating to the financial statement schedule,
which appears in this Form 10-K.




PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Cleveland, Ohio
March 16, 2001
|                                                                       
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                         
|View History:                                                          
|                                                                       
|North Carolina Natural Gas Industrial Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                       
|                                                                       
|North Carolina Natural Gas Industrial Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |         | 111,513 | 106,497 | 107,284
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 106,547 | 88,844  | 98,306  | 88,445  | 90,133  | 86,821  | 87,150  | 88,401  | 89,317  | 82,253 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 92,321  | 99,110  | 102,151 | 109,662 | 107,904 | 105,103 | 105,504 | 107,373 | 116,776 | 119,114
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 115,346 | 122,230 | 122,860 | 117,785 |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 72 (Tuesday, April 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 18365]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-9676]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-33,329]


Stride Rite Corporation Tipton, MO; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation 
was initiated on March 17, 1997 in response to a worker petition which 
was filed on March 17, 1997 on behalf of workers at the Stride Rite 
Corporation, Tipton, Missouri.
    An active certification covering the petitioning group of workers 
is already in effect (TA-W-33,328 A). Consequently, further 
investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the 
investigation has been terminated.

    Signed in Washington, D.C. this 4th day of April, 1997.
Russell T. Kile,
Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 97-9676 Filed 4-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
III 

★(Star Print)

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 541 

Designating June 27, 2010, as ‘‘National Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder 

Awareness Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 27 (legislative day, MAY 26), 2010 

Mr. CONRAD (for himself, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. SCHUMER, Ms. SNOWE, Mr. 

DORGAN, Mr. BROWNBACK, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Mr. FRANKEN, Mr. WARNER, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. BROWN of Ohio, Mr. INOUYE, and Mr. ROCKEFELLER) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

JUNE 23, 2010 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to with an amended preamble 

RESOLUTION 

Designating June 27, 2010, as ‘‘National Post-Traumatic 

Stress Disorder Awareness Day’’. 

Whereas the brave men and women of the United States 

Armed Forces, who proudly serve the United States, risk 

their lives to protect the freedom of the United States 

and deserve the investment of every reasonable resource 

to ensure their lasting physical, mental, and emotional 

well-being; 

Whereas up to 15 percent of Operation Iraqi Freedom and 

Operation Enduring Freedom veterans, 10 percent of Operation Desert Storm veterans, 30 percent of Vietnam 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS

2 

•SRES 541 ATS1S 

veterans, and 8 percent of the general population of the 

United States suffer or have suffered from Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (referred to in this preamble as 

‘‘PTSD’’); 

Whereas the incidence of PTSD in members of the military 

is rising as the United States Armed Forces conducts 2 

wars, exposing hundreds of thousands of soldiers to traumatic life-threatening events; 

Whereas from 2000 to 2009, approximately 76,000 Department of Defense patients were diagnosed with PTSD; 

Whereas the Department of Defense patients— 

(1) were hospitalized more than 5,300 times with a 

primary diagnosis of PTSD; and 

(2) had more than 578,000 outpatient visits in 

which PTSD was the primary diagnosis; 

Whereas PTSD significantly increases the risk of depression, 

suicide, and drug and alcohol related disorders and 

deaths; 

Whereas the Departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs 

have made significant advances in the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of PTSD and the symptoms of 

PTSD, but many challenges remain; and 

Whereas the establishment of a National Post-Traumatic 

Stress Disorder Awareness Day will raise public awareness about issues related to PTSD: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates June 27, 2010, as ‘‘National 

3 Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Awareness Day’’; 

4 (2) urges the Secretary of Veterans Affairs and 

5 the Secretary of Defense to continue working to edumstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS

3 

•SRES 541 ATS1S 

1 cate servicemembers, veterans, the families of 

2 servicemembers and veterans, and the public about 

3 the causes, symptoms, and treatment of post-trau4 matic stress disorder; and 

5 (3) respectfully requests that the Secretary of 

6 the Senate transmit a copy of this resolution to the 

7 Secretary of Veterans Affairs and the Secretary of 

8 Defense. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
#### Hankerson v. State

105,905

07/19/13

Denied.

Unpublished
No. 12-5981.

#### Clayton *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 53 (Wednesday, March 19, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 13156]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6915]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Dkt. C-3721]


J.C. Penney Company, Inc., et al.; Prohibited Trade Practices, 
and Affirmative Corrective Actions

agency: Federal Trade Commission.

action: Consent order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

summary: In settlement of alleged violations of federal law prohibiting 
unfair or deceptive acts or practices and unfair methods of 
competition, this consent order requires, among other things, J.C. 
Penney and Thrift Drugs, its wholly-owned subsidiary, to divest by 
March 21, 1997, to a Commission-approved acquirer, a total of 161 drug 
stores in North and South Carolina. The consent order settles 
allegations that J.C. Penney's proposed acquisition of Eckerd 
Corporation, and 190 Rite Aid drug stores in these two states, violated 
antitrust laws by substantially reducing drug store competition.

dates: Complaint and Order issued February 28, 1997.\1\

    \1\ Copies of the Complaint and the Decision and Order are 
available from the Commission's Public Reference Branch, H-130, 6th 
Street & Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20580.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

for further information contact: George Carey, FTC/H-374, Washington, 
D.C. 20580. (202) 326-3741.

supplementary information: On Monday, December 16, 1996, there was 
published in the Federal Register, 61 FR 66041, a proposed consent 
agreement with analysis In the Matter of J.C. Penney Company, Inc., et 
al., for the purpose of soliciting public comment. Interested parties 
were given sixty (60) days in which to submit comments, suggestions or 
objections regarding the proposed form of the order.
    No comments having been received, the Commission has ordered the 
issuance of the complaint in the form contemplated by the agreement, 
made its jurisdictional findings and entered an order to divest, as set 
forth in the proposed consent agreement, in disposition of this 
proceeding.

(Sec. 6, 38 Stat. 721; 15 U.S.C. 46. Interpret or apply sec. 5, 38 
Stat. 719, as amended; sec. 7, 38 Stat. 731, as amended; 15 U.S.C. 
45, 18)
Benjamin I. Berman,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-6915 Filed 3-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-M
#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Mark Anthony EDWARDS, Petitioner

No. 456 MAL 2017

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

November 28, 2017

*215ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 28th day of November, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-08-465-CR

SAMUEL JONES	APPELLANT

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

	------------

	FROM THE 367TH DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	Appellant Samuel Jones attempts to appeal from the trial court’s judgment sentencing him to life imprisonment for aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon.  We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

	Jones’s sentence was imposed on October 16, 2008.  See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1).  Jones did not file a motion for new trial; thus, his notice of appeal was due within thirty days—that is, on or before November 17, 2008.  See id.  Jones did not file his notice of appeal until December 3, 2008.  

	We sent notice to Jones on December 11, 2008, stating that because of the apparent untimeliness of his appeal, we would dismiss the appeal unless he or any party desiring to continue the appeal responded by December 22 and showed grounds for continuing the appeal.  On December 17, Jones filed a response to our notice, complaining that his appointed counsel had failed to file his notice of appeal in a timely manner.

	The lack of a timely notice of appeal deprives this court of jurisdiction.  See State v. Riewe, 13 S.W.3d 408, 410 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522–23 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); Williams v. State, 76 S.W.3d 207, 209 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2002, no pet.).  Therefore, because Jones failed to timely file his notice of appeal and failed to provide us with grounds for continuing his appeal, we must dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.2  See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).   

							PER CURIAM

PANEL: MCCOY, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and LIVINGSTON, J.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: January 22, 2009
United States Court of Appeals 

for the Fifth Circuit 

No. 20-60922 

Summary Calendar 

Dikonge Dasime Itoe, 

Petitioner, 

versus

Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, 

Respondent. 

Petition for Review of an Order of the 

Board of Immigration Appeals 

Agency No. A213 315 974 

Before Davis, Jones, and Elrod, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Dikonge Dasime Itoe, a native and citizen of Cameroon, petitioned for 

review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing 

his appeal from an order of the Immigration Judge (IJ) denying his 

applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the 

*

 Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. 

United States Court of Appeals 

Fifth Circuit 

FILED 

July 6, 2022 

Lyle W. Cayce 

Clerk 

Case: 20-60922 Document: 00516383858 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/06/2022
No. 20-60922 

2 

Convention Against Torture. Because the BIA has since granted a motion to 

reopen and remanded the matter to the IJ for further proceedings, the 

respondent has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the instant petition for 

review for lack of jurisdiction. 

We generally have jurisdiction to review a “final order of removal.” 

8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(1). An order of removal is final when the BIA affirms an 

IJ’s decision or when the time for appealing an IJ’s decision has expired. 8 

U.S.C. § 1101(a)(47)(B). Because this court may review a final order of 

removal only if “the applicant has exhausted all administrative remedies of 

right,” failure to exhaust results in a jurisdictional bar to review. Roy v. 

Ashcroft, 389 F.3d 132, 137 (5th Cir. 2004); § 1252(d)(1). 

In this case, the BIA has specifically ordered that the proceedings be 

reopened and has stated that, on remand, the parties will have an opportunity 

to update the record and the IJ will have an opportunity to further assess the 

merits of Dasime Itoe’s claims, including any newly offered evidence. The 

BIA must address any claims arising from these proceedings before Dasime 

Itoe can assert them before this court. See Roy, 389 F.3d at 137. Because 

Dasime Itoe is currently pursuing administrative remedies below, he is no 

longer subject to a final order of removal that this court has jurisdiction to 

review. See id.; see also Gregoire v. Holder, 421 F. App’x 432, 433 (5th Cir. 

2011) (holding that a BIA order granting reconsideration and remanding the 

matter to an IJ deprived this court of jurisdiction). 1

MOTION TO DISMISS GRANTED. PETITION FOR 

REVIEW DISMISSED.

1

 Unpublished opinions issued on or after January 1, 1996, are not binding 

precedent, but they may be persuasive authority. Ballard v. Burton, 444 F.3d 391, 401 n.7 

(5th Cir. 2006); 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4. 

Case: 20-60922 Document: 00516383858 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/06/2022
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**SECTION 906CERTIFICATION**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Summa Industries (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the fiscal quarter ended May 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James R. Swartwout,Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, herebycertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
|   |    /s/ James R. Swartwout |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | James R. Swartwout                       |
|   | Chief Executive Officer                  |
|   | Chief Financial Officer                  |
|   | Summa Industries                         |
|   | July 8, 2005                        |

 

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Summa Industries and will be retained by Summa Industries andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
#### *In re*A.E.S.

108,584

10/28/13

Denied

Unpublished
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.19
 ROBBINS & MYERS, INC.
 AWARD AGREEMENT
RESTRICTED SHARE AWARD TO
 AWARD AGREEMENT Agreement ROBBINS & MYERS, INC. Company  Employee
 Plan
 Committee Board
  NOW, THEREFORE, THE COMPANY AND EMPLOYEE INTENDING TO BE LEGALLY BOUND HEREBY AGREE AS FOLLOWS
 SECTION 1. RESTRICTED SHARE AWARD.
 1.1 Grant of Restricted Shares
 Award Date  Restricted Shares




---



##### 



1.2 Restrictions
    2




---



##### 



1.3 Vesting
 Vesting Date
    1.4 Acceleration on Change of Control, Death or Disability; Forfeiture .
    3




---



##### 



1.5 Committees Discretion
  1.5 Payment of Applicable Taxes.
  SECTION 2. REPRESENTATIONS OF EMPLOYEE.
  SECTION 3. NOTICES
  To the Company:
    
    Robbins & Myers, Inc.
5 Plum Street, Suite 260
Dayton, Ohio 45440
Attention: Vice President, Human ResourcesTo Employee:
    
    At the last residence address of Employee on file with the Company.
  SECTION 4. PLAN CONTROLLING
  4




---



##### 



SECTION 5. GOVERNING LAW
  SECTION 6. SEVERABILITY
  SECTION 7. STRICT CONSTRUCTION
  SECTION 8. DEFINITIONS
 (a)
 (b)
 5




---



##### 



(c)
  ROBBINS & MYERS, INC.
 By:Name:
    
    Peter C. WallaceTitle:
    
    President and Chief Executive Officer
 EMPLOYEE
 Name:
 6
Exhibit
23





Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm








We consent
to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
Valpey-Fisher Corporation on Form S-8 (File No. 333-116001, effective May 28,
2004, File No. 333-67726, effective August 16, 2001, File No. 333-94491,
effective January 12, 2000 and File No. 033-77554, post-effective amendments
November 1, 1999) of our report dated March 20, 2009, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Valpey-Fisher Corporation included in this
annual report on form 10-K for the years ended December 31, 2008 and
2007.





/s/ Stowe
& Degon, LLC





Westborough,
Massachusetts


March 27,
2009






- 75
-
# X13 - Expend per HH with Veh
|                                                                        
|------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                          
|View History:                                                           
|                                                                        
|New York Natural Gas Industrial Price  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                        
|                                                                        
|New York Natural Gas Industrial Price  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 5.05   | 4.02   | 3.90  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 6.14   | 7.72   | 5.53   | 7.35   | 8.05   | 10.76  | 10.56  | 11.43  | 12.30  | 9.52  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 8.55   | 8.18   | 6.92   | 7.44   | 8.13   | 6.62   | 5.92   | 7.21   | 7.83   | 7.70  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 7.00   | 8.38   | 11.30  | 10.89  |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
### SERVED: July 8, 2015 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC

IN THEMATTER OF FISHER SCIENTIFIC COMPANY, LLC DocketNo. FAA-2015- 1321

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FORFAATO RESPOND TO RESPONDENT'S MOTIONTO DISMISS (:;



### The Federal Aviation Administration (hereinafter "FAA") tiled a Motion for Extension ofTimeto respond to Fisher Scientific Company, LLC's (hereinafter "Fisher'') "MOTIONS TO DISMISS COMPLAINT FOR INSUFFICIENCY AND FOR COMPLAINANT'S VIOLATION OF RULE 208" (hereinafter "Motion'''). Fisher has not yet responded. We do not anticipate reaching this case until on or after mid-December 2015. WHEREFORE, it be and is hereby ORDERED the FAA file a response to Fisher's Motion onorbefore August 7, 2015.

Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative Law Judge Attachment- Service ListSERVICE 

### LIST- BY U.S. 

### MAIL ORIGINAL & 

### ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2W1000 1 ONE COPY Jerry W. Cox,

### Respondent's Counsel Counsel for Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.

and Fisher Scientific Co., LLC 2729 Gallows Rd., Suite401 Vienna, VA 22180 TEL: 703-757-5866 Email: jcox@potomacstrategyassociates.com William Vines, 

### Complainant's Counsel Office ofthe Regional Counsel, AS0-7 Southern Region 1701 ColumbiaAvenue College Park, GA 30337 TEL: 404-305-5200 FAX: 404-305-5223 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,

### Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. DepartmentofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 DocketNo. FAA-2015-1321 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.2