alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

________________________

No. 07-16-00110-CV 

________________________

IN THE INTEREST OF L.R., A CHILD 

 

 

On Appeal from the 99th District Court 

Lubbock County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 2015-790,967; Honorable William C. Sowder, Presiding 

 

April 14, 2016 

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

 

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ. 

Appellant, J.R.,

1

appearing pro se, filed a notice of appeal from a report and 

temporary orders issued by an associate judge in a suit affecting the parent-child 

relationship. We now dismiss the appeal for failure to comply with a requirement of the 

Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, for failure to comply with a notice from the clerk 

requiring action within a specified time, and for want of jurisdiction.

 

1

To protect the privacy of the parties involved, we refer to them by their initials. See TEX. FAM.

CODE ANN. § 109.002(d) (West 2014). See also TEX. R. APP. P. 9.8(b). 
2

By letter dated March 14, 2016, the clerk of this court notified J.R. that his filing 

fee of $205 was overdue and advised him that failure to pay the filing fee or file an 

affidavit of indigence by March 24 would subject the appeal to dismissal without further 

notice pursuant to Rule 42.3(c) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. To date, 

J.R. has not paid or made other arrangements for the discharge of the filing fee. Unless 

a party is excused from paying a filing fee, the clerk is required to collect filing fees set 

by statute or the Texas Supreme Court when an item is presented for filing. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 5, 12.1(b). Although the filing of a proper notice of appeal invokes an 

appellate court’s jurisdiction, if a party fails to follow the prescribed rules of appellate 

procedure, the appeal may be dismissed. Id. at 25.1(b).

In addition, J.R. purports to appeal a report and temporary orders concerning 

L.R., a child, signed by an associate judge on February 16. See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 

201.011(a) (West 2014). On February 17, S.R., the child’s mother, filed a request for a 

de novo hearing before the district court that referred the case to the associate judge. 

See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 201.015 (West Supp. 2015). The de novo hearing was set 

for March 9. Because the report of an associate judge is not a final, appealable order or 

judgment, this court does not have jurisdiction over the appeal. See id. at § 201.013(b) 

(West 2014).

For these reasons, this appeal is dismissed. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c). 

Per Curiam
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 72 (Wednesday, April 15, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18437-18438]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10015]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-4351-N-03]


Announcement of OMB Approval Number

AGENCY: Office of Policy Development and Research, HUD.

ACTION: Announcement of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 
approval number.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The purpose of this document is to announce the OMB approval 
number for the collection and analysis of data on the Survey of 
Community Development Work Study Program Participants.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Karna Wong, Office of Policy Development and Research, Room 8140, 
Washington, DC 20410--telephone (202) 708-0574. A telecommunications 
device for the hearing impaired (TTY) is available at (202) 708-3259 
(these are not toll-free numbers).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On September 18, 1997 (62 FR 49022), the 
Department published in the Federal Register, a notice of proposed data 
collection on the Survey of Community Development Work Study Program 
Participants. The document titled, ``Notice of Proposed Information 
Collection for Public Comment''--indicated that information collection 
requirements contained in the notice had been submitted to the Office 
of Management and Budget for review and approval under section 3506 of 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C., chapter 35 as amended). 
The notice also listed the title of the proposal, and description of 
the need for the information and proposed use.
    This present document provides notice of the OMB approval number. 
Accordingly, the control number approved by the Office of Management 
and Budget in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 
U.S.C. Chapter 35, as amended) for the Survey of Community Work Study

[[Page 18438]]

Program Participants is 2528-0192. This approval number expires on 
March 31, 2001. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is 
not required to respond to, a collection of information unless the 
collection displays a valid control number.

    Dated: April 8, 1998.
Paul A. Leonard,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for the Office of Policy Development.
[FR Doc. 98-10015 Filed 4-14-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-62-M
Exhibit 32.1:    Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Certification of Principal Executive Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350

I,
Larry T. Nicholson, President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) of The Ryland Group, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review
of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, of the Company (the "Report"), that:



/s/ Larry T. Nicholson Larry T. Nicholson
February 26, 2010


---



QuickLinks
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, October 18, 2017.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, October 18, 2017

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A18A0444. SHELTON R. THOMAS v. BRIAN OWENS et al..

Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW 

THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
#### State v. Jones

110,376

07/24/2015

Denied

Unpublished
##### 



Exhibit 21.1
  Subsidiaries
  Jurisdiction ofSubsidiary

Incorporation/
    Formation

Other names d/b/aCrystal River Capital TRS Holdings,
    Inc.

DelawareCrystal River CDO
    2005-1,
    Ltd.

Cayman IslandsCrystal River CDO
    2005-1 LLC

DelawareCRC SPV 1, LLC

DelawareCRC SPV 2, LLC

DelawareCRC SPV 3, LLC

DelawareCrystal River Resecuritization
    2006-1
    Ltd.

Cayman IslandsCrystal River Resecuritization
    2006-1 LLC

DelawareCrystal River Preferred Trust I

DelawareCRZ ABCP Financing LLC

DelawareCRZ Phoenix I LLC

DelawareCRZ Houston I GP LLC

DelawareCRZ Houston I LP

Delaware
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             972
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,175
<ALLOWANCES>                                       683
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          26,101
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,399
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  20,168
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              656
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,510
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    20,166
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,135
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,548
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (350)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,937
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,937
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 63 (Wednesday, April 2, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 15658]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-8393]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Geological Survey; Notice of Decision on Application for Duty-
Free Entry of Scientific Instrument

    This decision is made pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, 
Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-
651, 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). Related records can be viewed 
between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. in Room 4211, U.S. Department of Commerce, 
14th and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.
    Docket Number: 96-147. Applicant: U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, 
CO 80225. Instrument: Mass Spectrometer, Model Optima. Manufacturer: 
Micromass, United Kingdom. Intended Use: See notice at 62 FR 6216, 
February 11, 1997.
    Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. No instrument of 
equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument, for such 
purposes as it is intended to be used, is being manufactured in the 
United States. Reasons: The foreign instrument provides a magnetic 
sector analyzer with a three Faraday cup multicollector and with an 
internal precision of 0.01 per mil for 20 <greek-m>l samples of CO 
<INF>2. This capability is pertinent to the applicant's intended 
purposes and we know of no other instrument or apparatus of equivalent 
scientific value to the foreign instrument which is being manufactured 
in the United States.
Frank W. Creel,
Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff.
[FR Doc. 97-8393 Filed 4-1-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
#### State v. Heeke

112,742

09/14/2015

Denied

Unpublished
|                                                                                                
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                  
|View History:                                                                                   
|                                                                                                
|Percent of Industrial Natural Gas Deliveries in South Dakota Represented by the Price  (Percent)
|                                                                                                
|                                                                                                
|Percent of Industrial Natural Gas Deliveries in South Dakota Represented by the Price  (Percent)
|                                                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 24.1   | 35.6   | 37.0  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 41.9   | 42.1   | 19.4   | 25.5   | 28.2   | 30.2   | 33.6   | 17.8   | 16.9   | 14.4  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 10.4   | 4.7    | 4.3    | 5.2    | 4.6    | 4.4    | 4.5    | 4.4    | 4.7    | 5.2   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 4.1    | 3.5    | 3.4    | 4.1    |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                       
|View History:                                                        
|                                                                     
|South Dakota Natural Gas Industrial Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                     
|                                                                     
|South Dakota Natural Gas Industrial Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                     

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 6,928  | 5,607  | 5,043 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 4,323  | 4,211  | 10,584 | 11,181 | 10,967 | 10,661 | 10,426 | 20,701 | 32,466 | 36,301
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 40,755 | 40,668 | 40,432 | 44,039 | 44,205 | 44,094 | 44,570 | 45,641 | 46,972 | 46,014
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 45,621 | 48,732 | 50,199 | 50,626 |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
No. 12-5512.

#### Zeleke *v.*Zenawi.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 12-333.

#### Carter *v.*Department of the Navy et al.

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 517 

In support and recognition of National Train Day, May 8, 2010. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 7, 2010 

Mr. LAUTENBERG (for himself, Mr. ROCKEFELLER, Mrs. HUTCHISON, Mr. 

LIEBERMAN, Mr. SCHUMER, Mr. DURBIN, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. CARPER, 

Mr. DORGAN, Mr. WYDEN, Mr. BURRIS, Mr. BAYH, and Mr. UDALL of 

New Mexico) submitted the following resolution; which was considered 

and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

In support and recognition of National Train Day, May 

8, 2010. 

Whereas on May 10, 1869, the ‘‘golden spike’’ was driven 

into the final tie at Promontory Summit, Utah, to 

join the Central Pacific and the Union Pacific Railroads, ceremonially completing the first transcontinental railroad and therefore connecting both 

coasts of the United States; 

Whereas in highly populated regions Amtrak trains and 

infrastructure carry intercity passengers and commuters to and from work in congested metropolitan 

areas, providing a reliable rail option while reducing 

congestion on roads and in the skies; 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 517 ATS 

Whereas Amtrak ridership in Fiscal Year 2009 reached 

27.1 million passengers from 46 states; 

Whereas, for many rural Americans, Amtrak represents 

the only major intercity transportation link to the 

rest of the country; 

Whereas passenger rail provides a fuel-efficient transportation system, thereby providing clean transportation 

alternatives and energy security; 

Whereas, when combined with all modes of transportation, passenger railroads emit only 0.2 percent of 

the travel industry’s total greenhouse gases and one 

freight train can move a ton of freight 480 miles on 

one gallon of fuel; 

Whereas developing this pipeline of national high-speed 

and intercity passenger rail projects will revitalize the 

domestic manufacturing industry and create additional American jobs building on the one million 

good-paying, middle-class-creating American jobs 

that can never be off-shored that are already supported by the rail industry; 

Whereas ridership on Amtrak grew every year from 2000 

through 2008, and is currently on track for 2010 to 

be its best ridership year ever, further demonstrating 

the increased demand for intercity passenger rail 

services; and 

Whereas our railroad system is a source of civic pride, 

the gateway to our communities and a tool for economic growth that creates transportation-oriented development and livable communities: Now, therefore, 

be it 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 517 ATS 

1 Resolved, That the Senate supports the goals and 

2 ideals of National Train Day, as designated by Amtrak. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 10(a)(1)



        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT


     The certification set forth below is being submitted to the Securities and
Exchange Commission in connection with PCCW Limited's Annual Report on Form
20-F (the "Report") solely for the purpose of complying with Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

     Li Tzar Kai, Richard, the Chairman and Chief Executive and Alexander
Anthony Arena, the Group Chief Financial Officer of PCCW Limited, each
certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PCCW
     Limited.


Date:    June 24, 2003
                                   By:     /s/ Li Tzar Kai, Richard
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Name:   Li Tzar Kai, Richard
                                           Title:  Chairman and Chief Executive

                                   By:     /s/ Alexander Anthony Arena
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Name:   Alexander Anthony Arena
                                           Title:  Group Chief Financial Officer




     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act (the "Act"), or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906
of the Act, has been provided to PCCW and will be retained by PCCW and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 73 (Wednesday, April 16, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 18631]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-9755]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION


Real Estate Management; Cancellation of a Standard Form

AGENCY: Public Building Service, General Services Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the General Services Administration's 
intent to cancel the following Standard form because of low user 
demand: SF 2B, U.S. Government Lease for Real Property (Short Form).
    This form was replaced with GSA Form 3626, U.S. Government Lease 
for Real Property (Short Form). You can get copies of this form from 
the contact person mentioned below or from the following internet 
address: http://www.gsa/gov/pbs/pe/standcla/standcla.htm.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. Gary Roberts, Real Estate Management Division, Office of Property 
Acquisition and Realty Services, (202) 501-0407.

DATES: Effective April 16, 1997.

    Dated: March 7, 1997.
Theodore D. Freed,
Standard and Optional Forms Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-9755 Filed 4-15-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-34-M
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Sitka Sciences, Inc. (the "Company") on
      Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John Knox,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
                John Knox
              John
                Knox
              Principal
                Financial Officer
              February
                20, 2007