alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2019036EN.01000101.xml

| 29.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 36/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 36/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9127 — Carlyle/Sedgwick)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 36/01)

On 20 December 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9127. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9127. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  
  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 300 

Supporting the goals and ideals of Fire Prevention Week and the work 

of firefighters in educating and protecting the communities of this Nation. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 1, 2009 

Ms. COLLINS (for herself, Mr. CARPER, Mr. DODD, Mr. MCCAIN, and Mr. 

LIEBERMAN) submitted the following resolution; which was considered 

and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of Fire Prevention Week 

and the work of firefighters in educating and protecting 

the communities of this Nation. 

Whereas since the organization of the first fire departments 

during the colonial era of this Nation, firefighters have 

maintained their dedication to protecting the health and 

safety of the American public; 

Whereas firefighters presently provide a multitude of services 

to our communities, including emergency medical services, special rescue response, hazardous material and terrorism response, and public safety education; 

Whereas 103 firefighters lost their lives in the line of duty 

in 2008; 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 300 ATS 

Whereas the Nation’s fire departments respond to emergency 

calls nearly once per second and are dispatched to fire 

emergencies every 22 seconds; 

Whereas approximately 1,145,000 fires were reported in 

2008; 

Whereas firefighters always respond with courage, whether 

they are confronted with acts of terrorism, natural disasters, or other emergencies; 

Whereas Fire Prevention Week is the longest running public 

health and safety observance on record, as firefighters 

have been honored for their role in educating the American public since the first Fire Prevention Week was declared by President Warren G. Harding in 1922; 

Whereas the National Fire Protection Association has designated the week of October 4 through October 10, 2009, 

as Fire Prevention Week; and 

Whereas educating all Americans to ‘‘Stay Fire Smart’’ continues to be a priority for all firefighters: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) supports the work of firefighters in edu3 cating and protecting the communities of this Na4 tion; and 

5 (2) supports the goals and ideals of Fire Pre6 vention Week. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 71 (Monday, April 14, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 18144]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-9456]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[ID-990-1020-00]


Notice of Resource Advisory Council Meeting

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Upper Columbia--Salmon Clearwater 
Districts, Idaho.

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act 
and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), 5 U.S.C. 
Appendix, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) announces the meeting of 
the Upper Columbia--Salmon Clearwater Districts Resource Advisory 
Council (RAC) on Wednesday, May 14, 1997 and Thursday, May 15, 1997 in 
Salmon, Idaho.
    The purpose of the meeting is to brief the RAC on upcoming sub-
basin and watershed assessments, which will be part of the 
implementation process for the Interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem 
Management Project, and to provide a field tour of the Herd Creek 
watershed. Other administrative issues may be discussed as time 
permits. The RAC will meet from 1:00 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. (MDT) on May 14 
and 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. (MDT) on May 15. The public may address the 
Council during the public comment period starting at 1:30 p.m. on May 
14 at BLM's Salmon Field Office, Highway 93 South, Salmon, Idaho.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: All Resource Advisory Council meetings are 
open to the public. Interested persons may make oral statements to the 
Council, or written statements may be submitted for the Council's 
consideration. Depending on the number of persons wishing to make oral 
statements, a per-person time limit may be established by the District 
Manager.
    The Council's responsibilities include providing long-range 
planning and establishing resource management priorities.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ted Graf (208) 769-5004.

    Dated: April 4, 1997.
Fritz U. Rennebaum,
District Manager.
[FR Doc. 97-9456 Filed 4-11-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GG-M
Exhibit 10.1


 






    1


     

    

 












    2


     

    

 









    3


     

    

 












    4


     

    

 


 


5
|                                                                                            
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                              
|View History:                                                                               
|                                                                                            
|Percent of Commercial Natural Gas Deliveries in Delaware Represented by the Price  (Percent)
|                                                                                            
|                                                                                            
|Percent of Commercial Natural Gas Deliveries in Delaware Represented by the Price  (Percent)
|                                                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 98.8  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 98.0   | 98.3   | 82.8   | 82.8   | 81.6   | 83.3   | 77.5   | 74.8   | 70.6   | 53.5  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 49.8   | 53.4   | 43.7   | 45.0   | 46.2   | 45.7   | 37.2   | 36.0   | 36.2   | 35.7  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 33.2   | 33.6   | 49.9   | 49.3   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 73 (Wednesday, April 16, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 18556]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-9751]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[OH106-1b; FRL-5808-6]


Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Ohio

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On November 12, 1996, USEPA received a State Implementation 
Plan (SIP) revision request from the Ohio Environmental Protection 
Agency (Ohio EPA). This revision request was in the form of an 
amendment to the Ohio Administrative Code (OAC) which added an 
additional exemption from organic compound emission controls for 
qualifying new sources. In this action, USEPA is proposing to approve 
the State's SIP revision request. In the final rules section of this 
Federal Register, the USEPA is approving this action as a direct final 
rule without prior proposal because USEPA views this as a 
noncontroversial action and anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed 
rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final rule. If no 
adverse comments are received in response to that direct final rule, no 
further activity is contemplated in relation to this proposed rule. If 
USEPA receives substantive adverse comments not previously addressed by 
the State or USEPA, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all 
public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule 
based on the proposed rule. USEPA will not institute a second comment 
period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting on this 
document should do so at this time.

DATES: Comments on this proposed rule must be received on or before May 
16, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be mailed to: J. Elmer Bortzer, 
Chief, Regulation Development Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), 
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson 
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
    Copies of the State submittal and USEPA's analysis of it are 
available for inspection at: Regulation Development Section, Air 
Programs Branch (AR-18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 
5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Randolph O. Cano, Regulation 
Development Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), U.S. Environmental 
Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 
Illinois 60604, (312) 886-6036.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For additional information see the direct 
final rule published in the rules section of this Federal Register.

    Dated: April 1, 1997.
Michelle D. Jordan,
Acting Regional Administrator.
[FR Doc. 97-9751 Filed 4-15-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

Case number: 01-11-01125-CR

Style: Elisa Merrill Wilson, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

Type of motion: Motion for rehearing 

Party filing motion: Appellant

It is ordered that the motion for rehearing is denied. 

Judge’s signature: /s/ Jane Bland

Acting for the Court

Panel consists of: Chief Justice Radack and Justices Bland and Huddle

Date: April 30, 2015
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 73 (Thursday, April 16, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18964-18965]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10043]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Research and Special Programs Administration
[Docket No. RSPA-98-3665 (PDA-21(R)]


Application by Association of Waste Hazardous Materials 
Transporters for a Preemption Determination as to Tennessee Hazardous 
Waste Transporter Fee and Reporting Requirements

AGENCY: Research and Special Programs Administration (RSPA), DOT.

ACTION: Public notice and invitation to comment; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice corrects an error in the DATES section of the 
public notice and invitation to comment published on April 9, 1998 (63 
FR 17479) and clarifies that an administrative determination on the 
application by the Association of Waste Hazardous Materials 
Transporters will be issued by RSPA's Associate Administrator for 
Hazardous Materials Safety.

DATES: Comments received on or before May 26, 1998, and rebuttal 
comments received on or before July 8, 1998, will be considered before 
an administrative ruling is issued by RSPA's Associate Administrator 
for Hazardous Materials Safety. Rebuttal comments may discuss only 
those issues raised by comments received during the initial comment 
period and may not discuss new issues.


[[Page 18965]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Frazer C. Hilder, Office of the Chief 
Counsel, Research and Special Programs Administration, U.S. Department 
of Transportation, Washington, DC 20590-0001 (Tel. No. 202-366-4400).

    Issued in Washington, DC on April 10, 1998.
Alan I. Roberts,
Associate Administrator for Hazardous Materials Safety.
[FR Doc. 98-10043 Filed 4-15-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-60-M
Motion Granted and Order filed October 13 , 20 1 1

.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14

- 11

- 00 295

- CR

____________

CHRISTOPHER MOUTON

, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 185th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1269668



### ORDER

Appellant ’ s court

- appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal

is wholly frivolous and without merit. Ap pellant has made known to this c ourt his desire

to review the record and file a pro se brief. See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967);

Gainous v. State , 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969).

Accordingly, we hereby direct the Judge of the 185th District Court to afford

appellant a n opportunity to view the trial record in accordance with local procedure; that

the clerk of that court furnish the record to appellant on or before October 28, 20 11 ; that

the clerk of that court certify to thi s c ourt the date on which delivery of the reco rd to2

appellant is made; and that appellant f ile his pro se brief with this c ourt within thirty days

of that date.

PER CURIAM
174P16

#### State v. Travis Taylor Dail

1. State’s Motion for Temporary Stay (COAP16-291)

2. State’s Petition for *Writ of Supei'sedeas*

3. State’s Petition for *Writ of Certiorari*to Review Order of COA

1. Allowed 05/11/2016 Dissolved 08/18/2016

2. Denied

3. Denied
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 69 (Thursday, April 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 17633]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-9225]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[AZ-020-07-2811-00]


Notice of Intent To Hold Public Meeting Regarding the Draft BLM 
Phoenix Field Office Fire Management Plan

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Fire management plan, notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a public meeting to discuss the 
development of the Phoenix Field Office Fire Management Plan. The 
meeting will be held on Monday, April 28, 1997, from 4 to 7 p.m., at 
the BLM's Phoenix Field Office, 2015 West Deer Valley Road, Phoenix, 
Arizona.
    This plan is required by the Federal Wildland Fire Policy for every 
area with burnable vegetation. Wildland fire management decisions are 
based on these approved fire management plans in conjunction with land 
and resource management plans. New fire management plans must be 
developed and in place by all BLM offices in fiscal year 1998. The 
initial phase of this two-phase process requires completion of draft 
fire management direction by June 1, 1997. Final fire management 
direction must be completed by November 1997.
    Comments to the above address, Attention: Glenn Joki, will be 
accepted until May 12, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Glenn Joki, Fire Management Officer, Phoenix Field Office, 2015 West 
Deer Valley Road, Phoenix, Arizona 85027, (602) 780-8090.

    Dated: April 2, 1997.
David J. Miller,
Acting Field Office Manager.
[FR Doc. 97-9225 Filed 4-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-62-M
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 584 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 584

      Commemorating the 2010 Special Olympics USA National Games.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 15, 2010

 Mr. Johanns submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
         the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

                             July 20, 2010

             Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
      Commemorating the 2010 Special Olympics USA National Games.

Whereas the 2010 Special Olympics USA National Games will be held in Lincoln, 
        Nebraska, from July 18 to July 23, 2010;
Whereas nearly 4,000 athletes and coaches from 49 State delegations will 
        participate in the Games;
Whereas approximately 30,000 people, including families and friends of the 
        athletes, and enthusiastic supporters, are expected to visit or attend 
        the Games;
Whereas more than 8,500 volunteers will contribute time and talent to make the 
        Games a success;
Whereas, for decades, the Special Olympics has provided athletes with a unique 
        opportunity to participate in athletic competition while developing 
        confidence, skill, and determination;
Whereas the 2010 Special Olympics USA National Games continues the great 
        tradition begun by Eunice Shriver in 1968, and proves the belief of Ms. 
        Shriver that through sports, people with intellectual disabilities ``can 
        realize their potential for growth'';
Whereas 70 Nebraska communities are participating in the Law Enforcement Torch 
        Run, in which law enforcement officials from the State of Nebraska and 
        across the United States carry the ``Flame of Hope'' through Nebraska; 
        and
Whereas the State of Nebraska, the city of Lincoln, and more than 100 State and 
        local businesses and organizations have made major contributions and 
        opened their doors so that people from across the United States can 
        participate in and enjoy the 2010 Special Olympics USA National Games: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) applauds the participants and coaches of the 2010 
        Special Olympics USA National Games, as well as the volunteers 
        and law enforcement officers who support the Games; and
            (2) thanks all the people who contributed to the Games for 
        their generous efforts and gifts to make the Games a reality.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Petitioner

v. DEVINE ANTONIO CAMPBELL, Respondent : : : : : : : : : : : No. 389 WAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 25th day of November, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
Service Mark License Agreement



 Exhibit 10.11 
  
 Service Mark License Amendment 
  
 This Service Mark License Amendment (“Agreement”) is made as of the last dated signature below by and
between AT&T Corp for itself and for the benefit of each of its Subsidiaries and Affiliates (collectively “AT&T”) and Alestra S. de R.L. de C. V. (“Alestra”). 
  
 Recitals 
  
 WHEREAS, AT&T and Alestra are parties to that certain Amended and
Restated Service Mark License Agreement dated as of October 19, 1996 pursuant to which Alestra pays AT&T a royalty rate for, inter alia, the right to use the AT&T Brand (“Service Mark Agreement”) ; and 
  
 WHEREAS, AT&T and Alestra wish to amend the royalty rate in the Service
Mark Agreement. 
  
 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration for the mutual
covenants contained herein and other good and valuable consideration (the receipt and sufficiency of which are acknowledged by the parties), the parties each agree as follows: 
  

	 	1.	 	Effective upon execution of this Agreement, the royalty rate and fees set forth in section 5.1 of the Service Mark Agreement for the Royalty Periods covering Year
2003 and beyond are revised to a fee which is equal to (a) Three Million U.S. Dollars ($3,000,000) or (b) one percent (1%) of Alestra’s EBITDA whichever amount is greater (“Service Mark Fee”). AT&T shall re-invest sixty-seven
percent (67%) of the Service Mark Fee in the development of the AT&T Brand in Mexico. 

  

	 	2.	 	Terms capitalized but not defined in this Agreement shall have the meaning given to such terms in the Service Mark Agreement.  

  

	 	3.	 	This Agreement shall be governed by, construed and interpreted in accordance with, the substantive laws of the State of New York without regard to its conflict of
laws provisions. All disputes, controversies, or claims, whether based in contract, tort, statute, fraud, misrepresentation or any other legal theory, arising out of or relating to this Agreement shall be resolved as provided by the provisions found
in Article XII of the JVA. 

  

	 	4.	 	This Agreement shall not be amended, altered, modified, changed or rescinded except by an instrument in writing signed by the parties hereto.


  

	 	5.	 	This Agreement is effective as from the date of the last signature below. 

  

	 	6.	 	This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which together shall constitute one
instrument. Each counterpart may consist of a number of copies each signed by less than all, but together signed by all the parties. 

  










	 	7.	 	The provision of this Agreement contain the entire agreement of the parties relating to the subject matter hereof and supercede all prior agreements and
understandings relating to the subject matter hereof. 

  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties has caused this Agreement to be executed in duplicate originals by its duly authorized representatives as of the last dated signature below. 
  

	Alestra S. de R.L. de C.V.	 	AT&T Corp.
	 	 	 

  

		
	 By:    /s/    Alestra S. de R.L. de C.V.  
	 	 By:    /s/    AT&T
Corp.        

	Name:	 	Name:
	Date:	 	Date: