alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
S94A1851.

#### THOMPSON v. BEARDEN.

(453 SE2d 20)

Thompson, Justice.

J. P. and Pearl Moore conveyed certain real property to Dan and Mary Bearden via warranty deed. The total purchase price of the property was $5,500. The Beardens made a down payment of $2,500 and agreed to pay the balance in monthly installments of $40.

Dorse Bearden, Dan’s brother, lived with the Beardens on the property. He gave Dan $40 per month until the balance due was paid.

The Beardens died (within one week of each other) intestate, thirty years after they purchased the property. Dorse claimed he was *17entitled to the property pursuant to a resulting trust. The administra-trix of the Beardens’ estates disagreed and the case was tried by a jury.

At trial, Dorse testified that Dan made the $2,500 down payment and he paid the balance in installments of $40 per month. Asked if he contributed anything toward the down payment, Dorse replied that he did not.

The jury awarded the property to Dorse and judgment was entered accordingly. The administratrix moved for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict, or in the alternative, for a new trial. The motion was denied and the administratrix appeals, asserting the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict. We agree and reverse.

> 1. At the outset it should be noted that the law favors title to realty being evidenced by written instruments. [Cits.] Conversely, the law does not favor title to realty being evidenced by parol agreements, including parol resulting trusts. Parol trusts claimed after the death of the alleged trustee are particularly not favored. For the foregoing reasons the law requires that resulting trusts be shown by clear and convincing proof. [Cits.]

*Freeman v. Saxton,*243 Ga. 571, 572 (255 SE2d 28) (1979).

> 2. In order to set up ... an implied resulting trust in favor of one paying the purchase-money where the title is placed in another, it is indispensable that it be shown that the purchase-price was paid by the beneficiary of the trust at or before the time the conveyance was made, or that it be shown, other than by a void parol agreement, that it was the intent and purpose of the parties *at the time the conveyance was made*that the one claiming the benefit of the trust should pay the purchase-money in conformity with such original intent and purpose of the parties.

*Loggins v. Daves,*201 Ga. 628 (4) (40 SE2d 520) (1946).

3. Inasmuch as Dorse failed to demonstrate that he contributed any money toward the purchase of the property at the time the conveyance was made, or that it was the intent and purpose of the parties to create a trust at that time, he cannot claim the benefit of a resulting trust. Id.; *Hall v. Higgison,*222 Ga. 373, 376 (149 SE2d 808) (1966). The fact that Dorse made the subsequent installment payments does not support a contrary conclusion. *Loggins v. Daves,*supra at 629.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*18Decided February 13, 1995.

*Clifton M. Patty, Jr.,*for appellant.

*John 0. Wiggins,*for appellee.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 2 (Monday, January 5, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 205]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-026]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign Trade Zones Board
[Order No. 945]


Expansion of Foreign-Trade Zone 185 Culpeper County, Virginia

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 
18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board 
(the Board) adopts the following Order:
    Whereas, an application from the Culpeper County Chamber of 
Commerce, grantee of FTZ 185, requesting authority to expand FTZ 185 to 
include an additional site in Culpeper County, Virginia, was filed by 
the Board on April 26, 1996 (FTZ Docket 35-96, 61 FR 21157, 5/9/96);
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in the Federal 
Register and the application has been processed pursuant to the FTZ Act 
and the Board's regulations; and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
the Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the 
public interest;
    Now, therefore, the Board hereby orders:
    The application to expand FTZ 185 to include an additional site is 
approved, subject to the Act and the Board's regulations, including 
Section 400.28.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 22nd day of December 1997.
Robert S. LaRussa,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, Alternate 
Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
Attest:
John J. Da Ponte, Jr.,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-026 Filed 1-2-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
#### COM. v. SLUTZKER, S.

1881 WDA 2015

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/07/2017

CP-02-CR-0006520-1991

(Allegheny)

Affirmed
# C_2019373EN.01000101.xml

| 5.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 373/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.11.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 373/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9462 — Emil Frey Group/Autocommerce/Avto Triglav/AC-Mobil)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 373/01)

On 18 October 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9462. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9462. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
# Table 6.1

# RSE 6.1
From: Maxwell, Bill To: Cortney Higgins (Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov) Cc: Wayland, Robertj Subject: Revised draft final MATS reconsideration preamble and reg Date: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 3:52:00 PM Attachments: 030513 vs 031913_redline.docx EO12866_MATS_Reconsideration_2060-AR62_Final_20130319.docx

Cortney –

Here is the revised version of the preamble along with a redline/strikeout against the March 5, 2013, version.

Thanks.

Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt

Bill Maxwell Energy Strategies Group Sector Policies and Programs Division U.S. EPA Mail Code D243-01 109 T.W. Alexander Drive Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Phone: 919-541-5430 FAX: 919-541-5450
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 58 (Wednesday, March 26, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14411-14412]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-7573]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP96-352-006]


Transwestern Pipeline Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

March 20, 1997.
    Take notice that on March 17, 1997, Transwestern Pipeline Company 
(Transwestern), tendered for filing to become part of Transwestern's 
FERC Gas Tariff, the following tariff sheets, proposed to be effective 
April 1, 1997.

Second Revised Volume No. 1.

Substitute 14 Revised Sheet No. 48
Substitute 12 Revised Sheet No. 80

    Transwestern states that it is complying with the Commission's 
February 28, 1997 order in this docket by removing from its tariff 
Section 8 of its General Terms and Conditions (GT&C) entitled 
``Experimental Pilot Program Relaxing the Price Cap for Sending Market 
Transactions,'' as well as any other tariff provisions that referenced 
the experimental pilot program.
    Transwestern states that copies of the filing were served upon 
Transwestern's customers and interested State Commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken in this proceeding, but will not serve 
to make Protestant a party to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are 
on file with the

[[Page 14412]]

Commission and are available for inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-7573 Filed 3-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# Table 2.1

# RSE 2.1
Exhibit 99.3 - Annual Statement of Compliance for the year
	       ended December 31, 2005

a)


AURORA LOAN SERVICES
A Lehman Brothers Company


Via UPS

February 23, 2006


Diana Kenneally
U.S. Bank National Association
1 Federal Street, 3rd Floor
Boston, MA 02110

RE:	SASCO 2005-OPT1
	Annual Officer's Certificate as to Compliance

Dear Ms. Kenneally:

The undersigned Officer certifies the following for the period ending
on December 31, 2005:

1.	I have reviewed the activities and performance of the Master
Servicer during the preceding calendar year under the terms of the
Trust Agreements and to the best of this Officer's knowledge, the
Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its duties, responsibilities
or obligations under the Agreements;

2.	Based on said review and to the best of this Officer's knowledge,
the Master Servicer is not in default of its obligations under the terms
of the Trust Agreements in any material respect, or, if there is a default
in the fulfillment of its obligations, a description of each default or
failure and the nature and status thereof has been reported to this Officer;

3.	To the best of this Officer's knowledge, nothing has arose to lead
this Officer to believe that its Servicer has failed to perform any of its
duties, responsibilities and obligations under its Servicing Agreement during
the preceding calendar year;

4.	To the best of this Officer's knowledge, the Servicer is not in
default of its obligations under the terms of its Servicing Agreement in any
material respect, or, if there is a default in the fulfillment of its
obligations, a description of each default or failure and the nature and
status thereof has been reported to this Officer;

5.	The Master Servicer has received from its Servicer such Servicer's
annual certificate of compliance and a copy of such Servicer's annual audit
report, in each case to the extent required under the applicable Servicing
Agreement, or, if any such certificate or report has not been received by
the Master Servicer, the Master Servicer is using its best reasonable efforts
to obtain such certificate or report.


Certified By:


/s/ R. Peter Karr
R. Peter Karr
Senior Vice President
Master Servicing Division
|                                                                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                    
|View History:                                                                                     
|                                                                                                  
|Pennsylvania Natural Gas Price Sold to Electric Power Consumers  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                  
|                                                                                                  
|Pennsylvania Natural Gas Price Sold to Electric Power Consumers  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 3.02   | 3.26   | 3.03  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 3.83   | 8.87   | 3.97   | 6.58   | 7.49   | 10.30  | 7.76   | 8.01   | 10.46  | 4.60  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 5.27   | 4.85   | 3.15   | 4.17   | 5.04   | 2.52   | 1.94   | 2.65   | 3.17   | 2.43  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1.69   | 3.43   | 6.29   | 2.14   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
Exhibit 31.2



Safeco Corporation and Subsidiaries



Certification of Chief Financial Officer



I, Christine B. Mead, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Safeco Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I
have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                     |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: March 12, 2004 |  | /s/ CHRISTINE B. MEAD                
|                     |  | Christine B. Mead                    
|                     |  | Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
Exhibit 32.1

Statement of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code as adopted

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, John Aglialoro, the Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of Cybex International, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that:

The Companys Form 10-Q
Quarterly Report for the period ended September 25, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



|                        |  |  |  |                                     
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------
|Dated: November 2, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ John Aglialoro                  
|                        |  | 
|                        |  |  |  | John Aglialoro                      
|                        |  |  |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF
THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO CYBEX INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY CYBEX INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND WILL BE FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 73 (Wednesday, April 16, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 18589]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-9737]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Science Board Task Force on Advanced Modeling and 
Simulation for Analyzing Combat Concepts in the 21st Century

ACTION: Notice of advisory committee meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board Task Force on Advanced Modeling and 
Simulation for Analyzing Combat Concepts in the 21st Century will meet 
in open session on April 28-29, 1997 at Strategic Analysis, Inc., 4001 
N. Fairfax Drive, Suite 175, Alexandria, Virginia.
    The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary 
of Defense and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition on 
scientific and technical matters as they affect the perceived needs of 
the Department of Defense.
    Persons interested in further information should call Mr. Ted Stump 
or Mr. Dave Bicksler at (703) 527-5410.

    Dated: April 10, 1997.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 97-9737 Filed 4-15-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             783
<SECURITIES>                                     5,938
<RECEIVABLES>                                   42,686
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (625)
<INVENTORY>                                     45,892
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                97,290
<PP&E>                                         262,520
<DEPRECIATION>                               (168,371)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 238,998
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           40,261
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,892
<OTHER-SE>                                     151,369
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   238,998
<SALES>                                         57,947
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                57,947
<CGS>                                           51,728
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   61,805
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 504
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,362)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,614
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,748)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,748)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.42)
        

</TABLE>