alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 8 (Monday, January 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 1737]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-895]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 
U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given of the following meeting of the 
Board of Directors of the Corporation for National and Community 
Service (the Corporation).
DATE AND TIME: Friday, January 17, 1997, from 10:30 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.

PLACE: The Corporation for National and Community Service, 1201 New 
York Avenue NW, 8th Floor Conference Room, Washington, DC 20525.

STATUS: The meeting will be open to the public up to the seating 
capacity of the room.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The Board of Directors of the Corporation 
will meet to review (1) reports from committees of the Board of 
Directors on Corporation activities, (2) a report from the Chief 
Executive Officer, and (3) the status of Corporation initiatives.

ACCOMMODATIONS: Those needing interpreters or other accommodations 
should notify the Corporation by January 15, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Contact Rhonda Taylor, Associate Director of 
Special Projects and Initiatives, the Corporation for National and 
Community Service. Telephone (202) 606-5000 ext. 282. TTD Number (202) 
565-2700. This notice may be requested in an alternative format for the 
visually impaired.

    Dated: January 9, 1997.
Barry W. Stevens,
Acting General Counsel, Corporation for National and Community Service.
[FR Doc. 97-895 Filed 1-9-97; 3:30 pm]
BILLING CODE 6050-28-P
#### State v. Sisk

106,987

08/29/13

Denied.

Unpublished
EXHIBIT 4.10.5

Ministry of the Russian Federation for Communications and Information

Amendment No. 5
to License No. 6038 (registration series A 002831)
dated March 7, 1997

Clause 8 of the “Conditions for Carrying out the Activities Under License No. 6038” shall read as follows:

“8.
The Licensee’s SPS-900 network shall be connected to the public communications network of the Russian Federation at the long-distance level pursuant to the General Scheme of Creation and Stage-by-Stage Development of the Federal GSM Mobile Cellular Communication Network of the Russian Federation, subject to the technical conditions issued by OJSC Elektrosvyaz of Stavropol Krai, OJSC Rostelecom or CJSC MTT, respectively.

The Licensee’s communication network may be additionally connected to the public communication network of the Russian Federation at the local level to ensure technical capacity for handling local traffic and rendering to subscribers of additional call-forwarding service from the local telephone network.

Additional connection of the Licensee’s network with the public communication network of the Russian Federation at the local level is allowed only if the networks are connected at the long-distance level.

Long-distance and international communication services to the Licensee’s network subscribers shall be rendered only through the public communications network of the Russian Federation.

The Licensee shall have the right to use communications channels and physical chains of the public communications network of the Russian Federation at the rates effective for a particular category of users.”

 

	 First Deputy Minister
 of the Russian Federation for
 Communications and Information
 	  
 	 [Signature]
 	  
 	 Yu.A. Pavlenko
 
	  
 	  
 	  
 	  
 	  
 
	  
 	  
 	  
 	  
 	 July 20, 2000
 
	  
 	  
 	  
 	  
 	  
 
	 Head of the Department
 of the Organization
 of Licensing Activity
 
 
 	  
 	 [Signature]
 [Seal]
 	  
 	 N.M. Popov
No. 12-6210.

#### Burgess *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000085462
<NAME> ROYAL APPLIANCE MFG. CO.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           1,001
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   39,761
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     34,052
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                83,802
<PP&E>                                          72,937
<DEPRECIATION>                                  35,654
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 126,141
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           54,164
<BONDS>                                         15,743
<COMMON>                                           210
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      56,024
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   126,141
<SALES>                                        286,123
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               286,123
<CGS>                                          204,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  204,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,559
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,346
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,910
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,436
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,436
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .39
        

</TABLE>
> ^ 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, DC 

William H. Keyes and 

DeWitt "Jack" Ferrell 

Complainants 

V. 

McMinn County, Tennessee 

Respondent 

FAA Docket 16-08-12 

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME 

Pursuant to 14 CFR § 16.11 (a), the Director does hereby extend the date that the Director's 

initial determination will be rendered in the above-referenced case to December 1, 2009. An 

extension is necessary because the Agency requires additional time to review information it 

believes is essential for a fair and complete hearing of the matter. 

Randall S. Fiertz Date 

Director of Office of Airport Compliance 

and Field Operations 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on October A ^ , 2009,1 caused to be placed in the 

United States mail (first class mail, postage paid) or personally delivered, a true copy of 

the foregoing document addressed to: 

William H. Keyes 

121 County Road 569 

Englewood, Tennessee 37329 

Complainant 

Dewitt T. Ferrell 

P.O. Box 206 

Athens, Tennessee 37371-0206 

Complainant 

John Gentry, Mayor 

McMinn County 

McMinn County Court House 

6 East Madison Avenue 

Athens, Tennessee 37303 

Respondent 

David Crews, Chairman 

McMinn County Commission 

McMinn County Airport Committee 

McMinn County Court House 

6 East Madison Avenue 

Athens, Tennessee 37303 

Respondent 

FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket 

FAA Office of Airports, Comphance and Field Operations, AGO-100 

le Torgersoi 

Office of Airport Compliance and 

Field Operations 

.•iiMj^.<M3»....
##### 



Exhibit 99.3
 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Compliance
 
 Report of
Management on Compliance Report of Management on Compliance
   /s/ Ernst & Young LLP Des Moines, IowaMarch 13, 2006




---



##### 



Report of Management on Compliance
  /s/ Ellen Z. Lamale




---



##### 



Exhibit A
Specified Standards
 I. Funding Agreement Payments
  1.

    calculated according to the terms of the Funding Agreement; and2.

    promptly paid, within two business days of the due date, to the Indenture
Trustee at the direction of the appropriate Principal Life Income Fundings Trust.
 II. Guarantee Payments in Support of the Payment of Amounts Due on the Funding Agreement
  1.

    calculated according to the terms of the Funding Agreement; and2.

    promptly paid, within two business days of the due date, to the Indenture
Trustee at the direction of the appropriate Principal Life Income Fundings Trust.
 III. Payments Under Indenture
Facility id

location 

type Lon Lat Utm zone elev

Receptor 

Type

01077NEI8517 L 34.827931 -87.665808 P
**Exhibit 3.62****ARTICLES OF ORGANIZATION**     The undersigned, with the intention of creating a Maryland Limited Liability Company files thefollowing Articles of Organization:(1) The name of the Limited Liability Company is: Avalon WestNeighborhoods, LLC. (2) The purpose for which the Limited Liability Company is filed is as follows: Real Estate Development. (3) The address of the Limited Liability Company in Maryland isc/o Steven B. Gould, Esq. Brown &Gould, LLP, 7700 Old Georgetown Road, Suite 500, Bethesda, MD20814. (4) The resident agent of the Limited Liability Company in Maryland is Steven B. Gould, Esq.whose address is Brown & Gould, LLP, 7700 Old Georgetown Road,Suite 500, Bethesda, MD 20814.             (5) /s/ Stuart M. Ginsberg    (6) /s/ Steven B. Gould                 Signature(s) of Authorized Person(s)       Resident Agent            I hereby consent to my designation in the document.          Steven B. Gould  **Filing party’s return address:**(7) Stuart M. Ginsberg, Esq.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-31274 Summary Calendar

__________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus BILLY RAY TATUM, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 91-CR-50073

- - - - - - - - - - May 15, 1996 Before REAVLEY, SMITH and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Billy Ray Tatum argues that the district court erred in denying his motion to reduce his sentence. We have reviewed the record, including the transcripts of Tatum's rearraignment and sentencing hearings, and the briefs of the parties, and have determined that the district court's denial of the motion should be affirmed. The district court did not have jurisdiction to reduce Tatum's sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) because he was not asserting that he wasNo. 95-31274 -2- entitled to relief under an amended guideline that had been given retroactive effect by the Sentencing Commission. See U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10(c), p.s.; United States v. Early , 27 F.3d 140, 142 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 115 S. Ct. 600 (1994) Tatum is challenging the district court's initial denial of a credit for acceptance of responsibility and its decision to sentence him as a career offender. These claims, which could have been raised on direct appeal but were not, are not cognizable pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. See United States v. Capua , 656 F.2d 1033, 1037 (5th Cir. 1981). The district court did not commit plain error in denying Tatum's claims that he was subjected to selective prosecution and that his sentence was improperly enhanced pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1). The former argument does not have a sufficient factual basis to support relief, and the latter argument is factually incorrect. Tatum's argument that he was subjected to double jeopardy has no arguable merit. See United States v. Moore , 958 F.2d 646, 650 (5th Cir. 1992). Nor does his argument that the district court breached the plea agreement by relying on the presentence report at sentencing have any merit. Tatum acknowledged in the plea agreement and at his rearraignment that his sentence could not be determined by the district court until the presentence report had been completed. Tatum argued for the first time in his reply brief that he was entitled to a jury trial to determine whether he violated 18 U.S.C. § 924(e) and that he was subjected to multiple punishmentNo. 95-31274 -3- because his property was forfeited without a hearing and he did not receive a sixteen-month credit on his federal sentence. This court will not review issues that are initially raised in a reply brief. United States v. Prince , 868 F.2d 1379, 1386 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 493 U.S. 932 (1989).
AFFIRMED.
|                                                                                           
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                             
|View History:                                                                              
|                                                                                           
|Percent of Commercial Natural Gas Deliveries in Montana Represented by the Price  (Percent)
|                                                                                           
|                                                                                           
|Percent of Commercial Natural Gas Deliveries in Montana Represented by the Price  (Percent)
|                                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 97.9   | 97.5   | 95.4   | 93.2   | 91.8   | 91.6   | 91.5   | 91.5   | 77.2   | 79.8  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 73.5   | 76.1   | 75.1   | 68.8   | 76.0   | 77.4   | 76.9   | 78.5   | 79.6   | 49.2  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 54.6   | 53.3   | 52.8   | 53.3   | 53.5   | 52.5   | 47.6   | 49.7   | 47.1   | 47.5  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 46.2   | 47.3   | 49.8   | 49.1   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
Status of PSD for Carlsbad Energy Center Project

Joe Garuba t

o

: Shaheerah Kelly 10/28/2009 12:13 PM

From: Joe Garuba <Joe.Garuba@carlsbadca.gov>

To: Shaheerah Kelly/R9/USEPA/US@EPA

History: This message has been replied to.

Hello Ms. Kelly,

I was wondering if there was any new information re: the EPA’s decision on requiring PSD for the

Carlsbad Energy Center Project.

As it stands now, the CECP schedule looks like, if approved, the project will be out of the CEC process by

the end of 2010 and through other permitting agencies by 2011 with the earliest potential construction

start by end 2011/early 2012.

Thank you

Joe Garuba

City of Carlsbad

760 434 2820
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of International Automated Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Neldon Johnson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:



(1)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.







/s/ Neldon Johnson



Neldon Johnson

Chief Executive Officer

November 22, 2004

---

Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of International Automated Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal period ending September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, LaGrand T. Johnson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:



(1)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.







/s/ LaGrand T. Johnson



LaGrand T. Johnson

Chief Financial Officer

November 22, 2004
**EXHIBIT 23.1** **CONSENT    OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We have issued our reports dated March 13, 2008    accompanying the consolidated financial statements and schedule    and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of    internal control over financial reporting included in the Annual    Report of Compass Diversified Holdings and Subsidiaries on    Form 10-K    for the year ended December 31, 2007. We hereby consent to    the incorporation by reference of said report in the    Registration Statements of Compass Diversified Holdings and    Subsidiaries on    Forms S-3    (File Nos.    333-147218    and    333-147217,    effective November 26, 2007) /s/  Grant    Thornton LLP     New York, New York    March 13, 2008
|                                                                                           
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                             
|View History:                                                                              
|                                                                                           
|Percent of Industrial Natural Gas Deliveries in Montana Represented by the Price  (Percent)
|                                                                                           
|                                                                                           
|Percent of Industrial Natural Gas Deliveries in Montana Represented by the Price  (Percent)
|                                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 3.1    | 1.5    | 1.7   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 1.9    | 2.2    | 2.1    | 1.8    | 1.6    | 1.8    | 0.7    | 0.8    | 1.0    | 1.1   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 1.5    | 1.3    | 1.0    | 1.2    | 1.4    | 1.4    | 1.6    | 1.4    | 1.4    | 1.6   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1.3    | 1.3    | 1.6    | 1.6    |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 74 (Thursday, April 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 18773]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-9890]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of Banks 
or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. Once the notices have been accepted for 
processing, they will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later 
than May 1, 1997.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (John E. Yorke, Senior Vice 
President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. Thomas Rily Ford, Paul Emil Nelson, and Henry Thomas Southway, 
all of Alamosa, Colorado; to each acquire an additional 3.0 percent, 
for a total of 26.6 percent each, of the voting shares of Alamosa 
Bancorporation Ltd., Alamosa, Colorado, and thereby indirectly acquire 
Alamosa National Bank, Alamosa, Colorado.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 11, 
1997.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-9890 Filed 4-16-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F