alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Sitka Sciences, Inc. (the "Company") on
      Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jay Lobell,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Jay
              LobellJay
                Lobell
              Principal
                Executive Officer
              March
                30, 2006
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2019130EN.01005501.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 8.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 130/55 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9340 — Alliance Automotive Group/PartsPoint Group)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 130/09)

1.

On 1 April 2019, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2019130EN.01005501-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Alliance Automotive Holding Limited (‘AAG’, United Kingdom), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | PartsPoint Group B.V. (‘PPG’, the Netherlands). |

AAG acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of PPG. The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for AAG: wholesale distribution of light vehicle and heavy commercial vehicle parts to the automotive aftermarket in France, Germany, the United Kingdom and Poland. In France, AAG is also to active at the retail level,

—   for PPG: wholesale distribution of spare parts and accessories for light vehicles in Belgium and the Netherlands.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2019130EN.01005501-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9340 — Alliance Automotive Group/PartsPoint Group

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2019130EN.01005501-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2019130EN.01005501-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
Exhibit 31.1—Section 302 CertificationI, Ellen Z. Lamale, certify that:I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containingdistribution or servicing reports filed in respect of period included in the year covered by thisannual report, of Principal Life Income Fundings Trust 2005-117;1. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report; 2. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided tothe depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, forinclusion in these reports is included in these reports; 3. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor and the trusteeunder the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, and based upon my knowledge and theannual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in thereports, the depositor and trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement;and 4. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the compliance by the trusteeand the depositor with the minimum servicing or similar standards based upon the reportprovided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with theUniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedures, as set forth inthe pooling and servicing, or similar agreements, that is included in these reports.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Ernst and Young and Citibank, N.A.Date: March 24, 2006   By: /s/ Ellen Z. LamaleName: Ellen Z. LamaleTitle: Senior Vice President and Chief Actuary
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2019154EN.01000601.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 6.5.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 154/6 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9234 — Harris Corporation/L3 Technologies)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 154/05)

1.

On 26 April 2019, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2019154EN.01000601-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Harris Corporation (‘Harris’) (USA) |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | L3 Technologies, Inc. (‘L3’) (USA) |

Harris acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of L3.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for Harris: international aerospace and defence technology supplier of products, systems and services for defence, civil government and commercial applications,

—   for L3: international aerospace and defence company supplying intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance, communications and electronic systems for military, homeland security and commercial aviation customers.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9234 — Harris Corporation/L3 Technologies

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2019154EN.01000601-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 10 (Wednesday, January 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 2139]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-916]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army


Notification of Location and Hours of Operation for Armed Forces 
Discharge Review/Correction Board Reading Room

AGENCY: Army Review Board Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with DoD Directive 1332.28D1f, the Secretary of 
the Army hereby gives notice of the location, hours of operation and 
similar types of information regarding the Reading Room. The Reading 
Room is located in the Pentagon, Room 2E123. Effective February 15, 
1997, the hours of operation are Thursday from 7:30 am to 4:00 pm.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
CPT Bronte I. Flood, Army Review Board Agency, 1941 Jefferson Davis 
Highway, Crystal Mall #4, Room 204, Arlington, VA 22202.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Discharge Review Board (DRB) documents made 
available for public inspection and copying are located in the Reading 
Room. The documents are indexed in a usable and concise form so as to 
enable the public, and those who represent applicants, to isolate from 
all decisions that are indexed, those cases that may be similar to an 
applicant's case and that indicate the circumstances under or reasons 
for which the DRB or the Secretary concerned granted or denied relief.

Gregory D. Showalter,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-916 Filed 1-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
From: "Irvine, Robert (DEQ)" <IRVINER@michigan.gov>

To: Douglas Aburano/R5/USEPA/US@EPA, 

Cc: "Maupin, Mary (DEQ)" <MAUPINM@michigan.gov>, Andy Chang/R5/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 07/09/2012 01:21 PM

Subject: PM2.5 data confirmation for iSIP

Doug:

We have reviewed our ambient monitoring data for PM2.5. We confirm that observed 24-hour PM2.5 

concentrations have always been below 140 ug/m3 at all locations in Michigan. Consistent with EPA's 

guidance, "Guidance on SIP Elements Required Under Sections 110(a)(1) and (2) for the 2006 24-Hour 

Fine Particle (PM2.5) National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)" September 25, 2009, areas that 

have not observed PM2.5 concentrations above EPA's intended significant harm level may opt to address 

emergency episode requirements by attesting that concentrations have always been below 140 ug/m3. 

As a result, Michigan satisfies requirements for emergency episode planning without contingency plan 

requirements specifically tailored to PM2.5.
#### State v. Garland

110,923

09/14/2015

Denied

Unpublished
---

Exhibit 23.4

Consent of Robert Fong

Reference is made to the:

Panantza & San Carlos Project Preliminary Assessment Report, dated October 30, 2007 and titled PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT REPORT, PANANTZA & SAN CARLOS COPPER PROJECT, Morona  Santiago, Ecuador; and

Mirador Project Feasibility Study Report, dated April 23, 2008 and titled MIRADOR COPPER-GOLD PROJECT, 30,000 TPD FEASIBILITY STUDY, Zamora-Chinchipe Province Ecuador

(collectively, the Technical Reports).

The undersigned hereby consents to references to its name and references to and excerpts from the Technical Reports in the Annual Report on Form 40-F of Corriente Resources Inc. to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission
for the companys 2009 Fiscal Year.

Dated this 15th day of March 2010.

/s/ Robert Fong, P.Eng
Robert Fong, P.Eng

---
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-13-00521-CR

Michael Manahan, Jr.

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

130th District Court of Matagorda County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 12-163

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed as modified by 

this Court. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

June 19, 2014
# C_2019009EN.01000102.xml

| 10.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 9/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 9/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9087 — Mondi Štětí/Holzindustrie Maresch/Eco-Investment/Labe Wood)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 9/02)

On 29 November 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in German language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9087. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9087. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,918,682
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  763,756
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,844,086
<PP&E>                                             562
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,200,787
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,045
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             8
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,187,734
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,200,787
<SALES>                                      1,694,404
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,922,839
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                44,140
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,878,699
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,873,299
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,873,299
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.94
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.94


</TABLE>
|                                                                                               
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                 
|View History:                                                                                  
|                                                                                               
|Minnesota Natural Gas Price Sold to Electric Power Consumers  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                               
|                                                                                               
|Minnesota Natural Gas Price Sold to Electric Power Consumers  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                               

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 2.44   | 2.36   | 2.69  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 4.54   | 5.25   | 3.76   | W      | W      | W      | W      | W      | 9.23   | W     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | W      | W      | W      | W      | W      | W      | W      | W      | W      | W     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | W      | W      | W      | W      |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
S94G1740.

#### METROPOLITAN BOY’S CLUB OF COLUMBUS, INC. et al. v. ZENECA, INC.

(454 SE2d 526)

Decided February 20, 1995.

*Webb, Carlock, Copeland, Semler & Stair, Wade K. Copeland,*for appellants.

*Rogers & Hardin, Phillip S. McKinney, Hagler, Hyles & Adams, M. Stephen Hyles, Doffermyre, Shields, Canfield & Knowles, Robert E. Shields, Richard A. Childs,*for appellee.

Per curiam.

In light of our decision in *Banks v. ICI Americas,*264 Ga. 732 (450 SE2d 671) (1994), the judgment of the Court of Appeals in *Zeneca, Inc. v. Metropolitan Boys’ Club of Columbus,*214 Ga. App. 169 (447 SE2d 108) (1994) must be reversed. We remand this case to the Court of Appeals with direction that it be reconsidered in view of *Banks v. ICI Americas,*supra.

*Judgment vacated and case remanded with direction to the Court of Appeals.*

*All the Justices concur.*
No. 12-6074.

#### Miles *v.*United States.

C. A. 10th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
|                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                   
|View History:                                                    
|                                                                 
|Michigan Natural Gas Industrial Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                 
|                                                                 
|Michigan Natural Gas Industrial Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |         | 243,338 | 215,135 | 239,392
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 237,030 | 223,855 | 236,133 | 213,252 | 210,501 | 211,539 | 188,508 | 146,585 | 141,182 | 128,504
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 143,351 | 151,083 | 158,591 | 170,833 | 180,829 | 171,196 | 172,006 | 170,189 | 176,250 | 173,618
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 154,149 | 158,649 | 167,907 | 163,057 |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### State v. Baker

112,297

09/23/2015

Denied.

Unpublished
EXHIBIT 11.
					     
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>                                             
					     
SCAN-OPTICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE                        
(thousands, except share data)                                             

						    Year Ended December 31      
	  
					       1996        1995         1994    
					     ----------------------------------
<S>                                          <C>         <C>         <C>                                              
Primary earnings per share                                                      
								 
Average common shares outstanding             6,530,244   6,512,475   6,030,469 
								 
Average Class A common shares outstanding                               427,232 
								 
Net effect of dilutive stock options and               
   warrants - based on the treasury stock              
   method using the weighted average market            
   price for the year                           185,218     107,795     401,843 
					     ----------   ---------   ---------
	 Total                                6,715,462   6,620,270   6,859,544 
					     ==========   =========   =========

	 Net income (loss)                   $    3,274   $  (1,255)  $   1,284 
					     ==========   =========   =========
								 
	 Earnings (loss) per share           $     0.49   $   (0.19)  $    0.19 

					     ==========   =========   =========
</TABLE> 

<PAGE>