alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered November 21 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 19
- 00439
- CV JOHN PANIAGUA; AND H ERMELINDA MARAVILLA CORONA AND JOSE CAMERINO MARAVILLA, SR., INDIVID UALLY, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES OF T HE ESTATE OF JOSE CA MERINO MARAVILLA, DECEASED, ET AL., Appellant s

V. WEEKLEY HOMES, LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 19
- 02097



### O RDER
Bef ore the Court is appellants’ November 20, 2019 unopposed second motion for
extension of time to file their brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellants’ brief due no later than December 11, 2019. Appellants are cautioned that the failure to file a bri ef by that date may result in the appeal being dismissed for want of prosecution. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8(a)(1)

.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE
|                                                                   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                     
|View History:                                                      
|                                                                   
|New Mexico Natural Gas Industrial Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                   
|                                                                   
|New Mexico Natural Gas Industrial Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                   

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 25,875 | 25,048 | 25,842
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 29,886 | 33,154 | 23,366 | 24,381 | 22,048 | 24,823 | 18,239 | 18,023 | 18,702 | 15,680
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 16,779 | 20,500 | 19,582 | 18,794 | 19,091 | 17,937 | 16,109 | 15,412 | 18,769 | 18,362
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 18,006 | 17,086 | 13,507 | 10,651 |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### State v. McCoy

106,097

07/19/13

Denied. ...

Unpublished
No. 12-6266.

#### Kluge *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
##### 



(1)
    
    fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of The Lubrizol Corporation.
 /s/ James L. Hambrick

James L. HambrickChief Executive Officer and PresidentNovember 9, 2007
  (1)
    
    fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of The Lubrizol Corporation.
 /s/ Charles P. Cooley

Charles P. CooleyChief Financial OfficerNovember 9, 2007
EXHIBIT 12.2
   1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Copa Holdings, S.A.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;
 4.
    
    The companys other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:
     5.
    
    The companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors
and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
    /s/ Victor VialVictor VialChief Financial Officer
No. 12-5695.

#### O’Bryant *v.*Finch.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
|                                                                                   
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                     
|View History:                                                                      
|                                                                                   
|California Natural Gas Deliveries to Electric Power Consumers  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                   
|                                                                                   
|California Natural Gas Deliveries to Electric Power Consumers  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                   

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |         | 595,822 | 649,087 | 723,171
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 893,377 | 973,327 | 726,627 | 705,343 | 770,517 | 689,169 | 770,836 | 834,286 | 857,867 | 808,928
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 736,092 | 616,564 | 855,342 | 825,713 | 831,522 | 805,933 | 666,017 | 600,988 | 614,722 | 568,341
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 616,256 | 646,082 | 642,745 | 635,259 |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
# C_2019196EN.01000201.xml

| 12.6.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 196/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.6.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 196/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9380 — Bâloise/Fidea)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 196/03)

On 5 June 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9380. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9380. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  
  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 491 

Commemorating the 40th anniversary of the May 4, 1970, Kent State 

University shootings. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 20, 2010 

Mr. BROWN of Ohio submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Commemorating the 40th anniversary of the May 4, 1970, 

Kent State University shootings. 

Whereas the year 2010 marks the 40th anniversary of the 

Kent State University shootings that occurred on May 4, 

1970; 

Whereas, on May 4, 1970, Ohio National Guardsmen opened 

fire on Kent State students who were protesting the 

United States invasion of Cambodia and the ongoing 

Vietnam War; 

Whereas 4 unarmed students (Allison Krause, Jeffrey Miller, 

Sandra Scheuer, and William Schroeder) were killed and 

9 others (Alan Canfora, John Cleary, Thomas Grace, 

Dean Kahler, Joseph Lewis, Donald MacKenzie, James 

Russell, Robert Stamps, and Douglas Wrentmore) were 

injured; 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 491 IS 

Whereas, in February 2010, the site of the May 4 shootings 

was entered in the National Register of Historic Places, 

the official list of the historic places in the United States 

worthy of preservation; 

Whereas, to preserve the memory of the May 4 shootings and 

encourage inquiry, learning, and reflection, Kent State 

has established a number of resources, including the May 

4 Memorial, individual student memorial markers and 

scholarships in memory of the 4 students who were killed, 

an experimental college course entitled ‘‘May 4, 1970 and 

Its Aftermath’’, and an annual commemoration sponsored 

by the May 4 Task Force; and 

Whereas Kent State has engaged the internationally renowned design services firm, Gallagher and Associates, to 

assist in the development of the May 4 visitors’ center as 

a central place where individuals can explore and better 

understand the May 4 shootings: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate, in commemoration of the 

2 40th anniversary of the Kent State University shootings 

3 that occurred on May 4, 1970— 

4 (1) recognizes the tragedy of the May 4 shoot5 ings and the implications that the shootings have 

6 had not only on Kent State and the local commu7 nity, but also on the Nation and the world; and 

8 (2) applauds the development of the May 4 visi9 tors’ center as an additional primary resource to 

10 preserve and communicate the history of the May 4 

11 shootings, its larger ethical and societal context and 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 491 IS 

1 impact, and its enduring meaning for our democratic 

2 Nation. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2  AMENDED CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Hipso Multimedia, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that the amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2008 of the Registrant fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.  Date: June 30, 2009/s/ Alex KestenbaumBy: Alex KestenbaumPrincipal Financial Officer
#### State v. Hindman

110,258

07/27/2015

Denied

Unpublished
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARVIN GEOVANNY CISNEROS,

Petitioner,

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 20

- 72462

Agency No. A094

- 304

- 017

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 14, 2023 * *

Before: FERNANDEZ, FRIEDLAND, and H.A. Thomas, Circuit Judges.

Marvin Geovanny Cisneros, a native and citizen of El Salvador

, petitions pro

se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his

appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his motion to reopen

removal proceedings. Our jurisdiction is gov erned by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

FEB 22 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 20

- 72462

for abuse of discretion the agency’s denial of a motion to reopen, and we review de

novo questions of law, including claims of due process violations due to ineffective

assistance of counsel. Mohammed v. Gonzales , 400 F.3d 785, 791

- 92 (9th Cir.

2005). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioner’s motion to

reopen as untimely where it was filed 18 months after the final removal order, and

petitioner has not established that any statutory or regulatory exception applies.

See 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(C)(i) (motion to reopen must be filed within ninety

days of the final removal order); 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3) (listing exceptions).

The agency did not abuse its discretion in declining to reopen based on

ineffective assistance of counsel where Cisneros failed to show prejudice from the

performance of former counsel

. See Mohammed , 400 F.3d at 793

- 94 (prejudice

shown where counsel’s performance was so inadequate it may have affected the

outcome).

We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s decision not to reopen removal

proceedings sua sponte. See Bonilla v. Lynch , 840 F.3d 575, 588 (9th Cir. 2016)

( “[T]his court has jurisdiction to review Board decisions denying sua sponte

reopening for the limited purpose of reviewing the reasoning behind the decisions

for legal or constitutional error.”)

.

We do not consider Cisneros ’ contentions regarding introduction of his3 20

- 72462

mental health records

, mistreatment in detention, and reconsideration of his

applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the

Convention Against Torture because the BIA did not decide the issue

, see

Santiago

- Rodriguez v. Holder , 657 F.3d 820, 829 (9th Cir. 2011) (review limited

to the grounds relied on by the BIA), and the BIA did not err in declining to

consider the claims where raised for the first time on appeal

, see Honcharov v.

Barr , 9 24 F.3d 1293, 1297 (9th Cir. 2019)

.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part

.
EXHIBIT
32.2








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2004





In connection with the Annual Report of
Recycle Tech, Inc.  (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the "Report'), Raymond
Kasel, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2004, that
to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:August
      27, 2008
              By:
              /s/ Raymond KaselRaymond Kasel

                Chief
      Financial Officer
ENDORSEMENT NO. 1 - TERMINATION


Attaching  to and forming part of the QUOTA SHARE RETROCESSION AGREEMENT
between  AMERICAN  HALLMARK  INSURANCE  COMPANY  OF TEXAS, Dallas, Texas
(hereinafter  called  the  "Company")  and  the  Reinsurer  specifically
identified below (hereinafter called the "Reinsurer").

IT  IS  AGREED,  effective 12:01 a.m., Central Standard Time, January 1,
1997  that  this  Agreement  is  terminated  and  the  Reinsurer have no
liability  for  losses  occurring subsequent to that date and time.  The
Reinsurer  will  return  to  the  Company  a  portfolio representing the
unearned premium reserve under this Agreement.

ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS REMAIN UNCHANGED.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto, by their authorized representatives,
have executed this Endorsement as of the following dates:

PARTICIPATING REINSURERS:

Dorinco Reinsurance Company          25.00%
Odyssey Reinsurance Corporation      25.00%



AMERICAN HALLMARK INSURANCE COMPANY OF TEXAS


Date____________________________________

By______________________________________
(signature)

________________________________________
(name)

________________________________________
(title)


QUOTA SHARE RETROCESSION AGREEMENT

              issued to

AMERICAN HALLMARK INSURANCE COMPANY OF TEXAS<PAGE>
Exhibit 99.1

                         ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE


                      OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE OF THE SERVICER

In compliance with Section 4.04 (g) of the Indenture of Trust by and between
Nelnet Student Loan Trust 2004-4 and Zions First National Bank, as Trustee,
dated as of September 1, 2004, I, Terry J. Heimes, certify that:

     1.   A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
          calendar year and of its performance under the Master Servicing
          Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

     2.   Based on my knowledge of such review, the Master Servicer has
          fulfilled all its obligations under the Master Servicing Agreement
          throughout such year.

March 20, 2006




By:     /s/ Terry J. Heimes
        --------------------------------
        Terry J. Heimes
        Chief Financial Officer,
        Treasurer,
        NELN, Inc.
#### IN the INTEREST OF: D.A.B., JR., a Minor

99 EDA 2017

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/03/2017

CP-51-DP-0000997-2013

(Philadelphia)

Affirmed
Exhibit 31(d)

Certifications of the CFO

Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Cynthia J. Devine, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of Tim Hortons Inc.; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 21, 2014



/s/ CYNTHIA J. DEVINEName: Cynthia J. Devine Title: Chief
Financial Officer
Exhibit13.1




PRINCIPAL
EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION




PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350






In
connection with this annual report of Aegean Marine Petroleum Network Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on or about the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, E. Nikolas Tavlarios, the Principal Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




A
signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
request.






Date:
April 7, 2008




/s/ E. Nikolas
Tavlarios


E. Nikolas
Tavlarios


Principal
Executive Officer
#### State v. Ellsworth

107,770

10/07/13

Denied. ...

Unpublished