alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
S95A0274.

#### GARRETT et al. v. MORTON.

(458 SE2d 618)

Hunt, Chief Justice.

The testatrix, Kathryn Morton, left a will with the following provision:

> I hereby specifically [sic] and bequeath any interests in real property I may own at the time of my death to my daughter Kathryn Ann Garrett. It is my request but not absolute direction that my sister-in-law L. Ruth Morton shall be responsible for the payment of the real property taxes, insurance (of which my estate shall be a loss payee) and all other costs of maintenance and in return, my sister-in-law shall be entitled to live at such real property until death. If my daughter Kathryn Ann Garrett fails to survive me said property shall be distributed to Mary Elizabeth Garrett, Ruth Ann Garrett, Daniel David Garrett, and David N. Garrett per stirpes (as determined at that time) with these same expressions of intent.

The trial court held that this language conveyed a life estate to Ruth Morton, the testatrix’s sister-in-law, and granted partial summary judgment to Ruth Morton on that issue. The trial court also denied the Garretts’ motion for summary judgment. The Garretts appeal, and we affirm in part and reverse in part.

The section of the will quoted above clearly conveys a fee simple interest in the testatrix’s property to her daughter. The question is whether this language reserved a life estate for Ruth Morton. In the construction of unclear wills, the rule is that the court assumes that one would rather have his or her property pass within the bloodline, the channel of natural descent, unless a contrary intent is made clear. *Trust Co. Bank v. First Nat. Bank,*246 Ga. 222 (271 SE2d 141) (1980). In saying that it was her “request but not absolute direction” that her sister-in-law be responsible for maintaining the property and be entitled to live at the property until death, Kathryn Morton failed to manifest a clear and convincing intent that a life estate pass to her sister-in-law. As such language is insufficient to carve a life estate out of the fee left to her daughter, the trial court’s grant of partial summary judgment to Ruth Morton on that issue must be reversed. The trial court’s order denying summary judgment to the Garretts except insofar as it is inconsistent with our holding above, is affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed in part and reversed in part.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*395Decided May 8, 1995.

*Parker, Johnson, Cook & Dunlevie, William C. Tinsley II,*for appellants.

*Rice & Keene, Kirk W. Keene,*for appellee.
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

July 09, 2004

Mr. Ricky J. Poole

Les Mendelsohn & Associates, P.C.

110 Broadway, Suite 500

San Antonio, TX 78205

Mr. Christopher John Deeves

Ball & Weed, P.C.

745 E. Mulberry Street, Suite 500

San Antonio, TX 78212

RE:Case Number:  03-0611

Court of Appeals Number:  04-02-00001-CV

Trial Court Number:  23261

Style:MARCUS MARTINEZ AND MARY KOOG, ON BEHALF OF THEIR MINOR CHILD, KAELYN C. MARTINEZ

v.

VAL VERDE COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT D/B/A VAL VERDE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas delivered the enclosed opinion and judgment in the above-referenced cause.  

Encl.

Sincerely,

Andrew Weber, Clerk

by Nancy J. Vega, Chief Deputy Clerk

**Case No. 03-0611Page 2**
<PAGE>   1
Exhibit 11.1

                        STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION
                             OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Statement Regarding Computation of                       Year to Date
Per Share Earnings                                      ended March 31,
                                                      --------------------
                                                      2000            1999
                                                      ----            ----

<S>                                                <C>              <C>
Basic earnings per share:
   Weighted-average shares outstanding              1,655,263        1,771,127
   Net income per share                            $      .53       $      .35

Diluted earnings per share:
   Weighted average shares outstanding              1,655,263        1,771,127
   Dilutive stock options                                  --           20,000
   Assumed repurchased under treasury
     stock method (1)                                      --          (19,056)
                                                   ----------       ----------
   Weighted-average common shares
     outstanding and common share
       equivalents                                  1,655,263        1,772,071
                                                   ----------       ----------

Net income                                         $  877,000       $  622,000
                                                   ==========       ==========
Diluted net income per share                       $      .53       $      .35
                                                   ==========       ==========
</TABLE>

[FN]
(1)  20,000  shares  of  common  stock   equivalents   were  excluded  from  the
     computation  of  earnings  per share at March 31,  2000  because  they were
     antidilutive.
</FN>

                                 PAGE 13 OF 14
#### State v. Erickson

107,725

08/23/13

Denied.

Unpublished
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT TO THE CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION



 Exhibit 4.4 
  

CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT 
 TO THE

 CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION 
 OF 
 EDGEWATER TECHNOLOGY, INC. 
  
 Pursuant to Section 242 of the 
 Delaware General Corporation Law 
  
 Edgewater Technology, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”), hereby certifies as follows: 
  
 1. The Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation (the “Certificate”) was filed in the Office of the Secretary of State of the State of
Delaware (the “Secretary”) on March 12, 1996. 
  
 2. The
Certificate was previously amended by a Certificate of Amendment filing with the Secretary on June 14, 1996. 
  
 3. The Certificate was previously amended by a Certificate of Amendment filing with the Secretary on May 12, 1998. 
  
 4. The Certificate was previously amended by a Certificate of Ownership and
Merger on June 29, 2000 changing the Company’s name to “Edgewater Technology, Inc.” in the Certificate, as so amended. 
  
 5. The Certificate was previously corrected by a Certificate of Correction filing with the Secretary on July 5, 2000. 
  
 6. A Certificate of Designation as allowed by the Certificate regarding
authorized shares of Preferred Stock was filed with the Secretary on July 25, 2000. 
  
 7. The first paragraph of Article Four of the Certificate is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows: 
  
 The total number of shares of all classes of stock which the Corporation shall have authority to issue is fifty million (50,000,000), divided into two
classes of which two million shares (2,000,000), par value $.01 per share, shall be designated Preferred Stock, and forty eight million shares (48,000,000), par value $.01 per share, shall be designated Common Stock (the “Common Stock”).

  

 1 








 8. This Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate was duly adopted by the unanimous vote of the Board
of Directors and the Board of Directors duly called an annual meeting of stockholders to, among other things, vote on such Certificate of Amendment, and resolutions to such effect were duly recorded. Upon notice, and in accordance with section 222
of the Delaware General Corporation Law, the Corporation convened an annual stockholders’ meeting on May 22, 2003 at which, among other things, this Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate was adopted by the holders of at least a majority
of the outstanding shares of the Common Stock of the Corporation entitled to vote thereon. As a result of the foregoing, this Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate was duly adopted in accordance with Section 242 of the Delaware General
Corporation Law. 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation
has caused this Certificate of Amendment to its Certificate of Incorporation to be executed as of the 23rd day of
May, 2003. 
  

	EDGEWATER TECHNOLOGY, INC.
		
	 By:
	 	 /s/    GORDON Y. ALLISON


	 	 	 Gordon Y. Allison
 Executive Vice President – General Counsel



  

 2
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 150 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 150

      Commemorating the 100th anniversary of the Elaine massacre.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 26, 2019

 Mr. Crawford (for himself, Mr. Hill of Arkansas, Mr. Womack, and Mr. 
 Westerman) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
      Commemorating the 100th anniversary of the Elaine massacre.

Whereas between September 30 and October 1, 1919, an unknown number of African 
        Americans were murdered in a racially motivated riot;
Whereas the violence erupted when the unionization of sharecroppers was falsely 
        portrayed as a Black insurrection against White landowners;
Whereas estimates range between 100 to 240 victims, making the massacre one of 
        the worst instances of mass racial violence in United States history;
Whereas official investigations were only made into the deaths of 5 White people 
        who were also killed in the violence;
Whereas those investigations resulted in the prosecution of 122 African 
        Americans; and
Whereas subsequent litigation resulted in the historic United States Supreme 
        Court decision of Moore et al. v. Dempsey in 1923, the first Supreme 
        Court case regarding the treatment of African Americans in State 
        criminal justice systems, setting a precedent for future review of State 
        criminal convictions: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) honors the lives and legacies of the unknown number of 
        African Americans who were murdered in Phillips County, 
        Arkansas, 100 years ago;
            (2) expresses its deepest sympathies to the families of the 
        victims; and
            (3) recognizes the role the massacre played in 
        strengthening United States citizens' due process rights 
        through Moore v. Dempsey, which set a precedent for the Supreme 
        Court's subsequent review of State criminal trials and their 
        compliance with the Bill of Rights.
                                 <all>
```
U.S. Energy Information Administration | Quarterly Coal Report, January - March 2024

Table 24. Average price of coal receipts at coke plants by census division

(dollars per short ton)

Year to date

Census division January - March

2024

October - December

2023

January - March

2023 2024 2023

Percent

change

Middle Atlantic w w w w w w

East North Central 207.83 231.30 224.78 207.83 224.78 -7.5

South Atlantic w w w w w w

East South Central w w w w w w

U.S. Total 196.01 214.74 206.99 196.01 206.99 -5.3

w = Data withheld to avoid disclosure.

Note: Average price is based on the cost, insurance, and freight (c.i.f. value). Total may not equal sum of components because of independent rounding.

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), Form EIA-3, 'Quarterly Survey of Industrial, Commercial & Institutional Coal Users.' Prior to third quarter 2014,

coke plant data was collected under Form EIA-5, 'Quarterly Coal Consumption and Quality Report - Coke Plants.'
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Mesoblast Limited (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended June 30, 2017 as filed on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paul Hodgkinson, Chief Financial Officer for the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  

I, Paul Hodgkinson, certify that: 

|   | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

| Date: August 30, 2017 |   | By:    | /s/ Paul Hodgkinson  |
|-----------------------|--------|--------|---------------------------|
|                  |   |   | Paul Hodgkinson           |
|                  |   |   | Chief Financial Officer   |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,436,000
<SECURITIES>                                   650,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               14,641,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   748,000
<INVENTORY>                                  7,341,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            25,050,000
<PP&E>                                     121,460,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              46,985,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             100,400,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       12,111,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    11,716,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  66,129,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               100,400,000
<SALES>                                    144,234,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           144,234,000
<CGS>                                       77,596,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               77,596,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,476,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            331,141,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                11,478,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         19,663,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                19,663,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.67
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.67
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 4.2
                              STEPHEN J. SCHOEPFER



March 31, 2003


JAG Media Holdings, Inc.
6965 S.W. 18th Street, Suite B13
Boca Raton, FL  33433


Re:  Promissory Note dated April 1, 2002 in the principal amount of $200,000
     between JAG Media Holdings, Inc. (f/k/a JagNotes.com Inc.), as borrower,
     and Stephen J. Schoepfer, as lender, with a maturity date of March 31, 2003
     ("Promissory Note")

Gentlemen:

This will serve to confirm that the "Maturity Date" of the Promissory Note is
hereby extended from March 31, 2003 to the earlier of (i) June 30, 2003 or (ii)
the effective date of a "Change in Control" as that term is defined in the
Company's Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended.

Except for the foregoing changes, the Promissory Note remains unchanged and in
full force and effect.

Sincerely yours,

/s/ Stephen J. Schoepfer

Stephen J. Schoepfer
# Table 3.4

# RSE 3.4

# Microsoft_Word_Document1.docx

# image1.emf

# Microsoft_Word_Document2.docx

# image2.emf
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 72 (Tuesday, April 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 18366]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-9677]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[NAFTA-01436]


Binks Sames Corporation, Franklin Park, IL; Amended Certification 
Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 250(a), Subchapter D, Chapter 2, Title 
II, of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 USC 2273), the Department 
of Labor issued a Certification for NAFTA-Transitional Adjustment 
Assistance on March 12, 1997, applicable to workers of Binks Sames 
Corporation located in Franklin Park, Illinois. The notice was 
published in the Federal Register on March 31, 1997 (62 FR 15200).
    At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers were engaged 
in the production of spray booths and other paint spraying equipment. 
Findings show that the Department incorrectly set the worker 
certification impact date at January 7, 1997. The impact date should be 
January 7, 1996, one year prior to the date of the petition. 
Accordingly, the Department is amending the certification to reflect 
this matter.
    The amended notice applicable to NAFTA-01436 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Binks Sames Corporation, Franklin Park, Illinois 
who were engaged in employment related to the production of spray 
booths who became totally or partially separated from employment on 
or after January 7, 1996, are eligible to apply for NAFTA-TAA under 
Section 250 of the Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, D.C. this 3d day of April, 1997.
Russell T. Kile,
Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 97-9677 Filed 4-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
Table of Contents

**UNITED STATES****SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION****WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549**
**FORM 20-F/A****(Amendment No. 2)**
**Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934**
**For the fiscal year ended December 31,2002**   Commission file number    1-3788     Commission file number    1-4039    **N.V. KONINKLIJKE    NEDERLANDSCHE** **THE “SHELL”    TRANSPORT AND TRADING****PETROLEUM    MAATSCHAPPIJ** **COMPANY, PUBLIC LIMITED    COMPANY**(Exact name of registrant    as specified in its charter)     (Exact name of registrant    as specified in its charter)     **ROYAL DUTCH PETROLEUM    COMPANY**  (Translation of    registrant’s name into English)       **The    Netherlands** **England**(Jurisdiction of    incorporation or organisation)     (Jurisdiction of    incorporation or organisation)     30, Carel van Bylandtlaan,    2596 HR The Hague, The Netherlands     Shell Centre, London    SE1 7NA, England    tel. no: (011 31    70) 377 9111     tel. no: (011 44    20) 7934 1234    (Address of principal    executive offices)     (Address of principal    executive offices)    
**Securities Registered Pursuant toSection 12(b) of the Act**
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2019094EN.01000201.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 12.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/2 |

---

OPINION OF THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK

of 6 March 2019

on a Council recommendation on the appointment of a member of the Executive Board of the European Central Bank

(CON/2019/11)

(2019/C 94/02)

Introduction and legal basis

On 20 February 2019 the European Central Bank (ECB) received a request from the President of the European Council for an opinion on Council Recommendation of 12 February 2019 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2019094EN.01000201-E0001) on the appointment of a member of the ECB’s Executive Board.

The competence of the ECB’s Governing Council to deliver an opinion is based on Article 283(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

General observations

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 1. | The Council’s recommendation, which was submitted to the European Council and on which the European Parliament and the ECB’s Governing Council are being consulted, recommends that Philip R. LANE be appointed as a member of the ECB’s Executive Board for a term of office of eight years with effect from 1 June 2019. |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 2. | The ECB’s Governing Council is of the opinion that the proposed candidate is a person of recognised standing and professional experience in monetary or banking matters as required by Article 283(2) of the Treaty. |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 3. | The ECB’s Governing Council has no objection to the Council’s recommendation to appoint Philip R. LANE as a member of the ECB’s Executive Board. |

Done at Frankfurt am Main, 6 March 2019.

The President of the ECB

Mario DRAGHI

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2019094EN.01000201-E0001)  [OJ C 60, 15.2.2019, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2019_060_R_TOC).

---
Motion Granted and Order filed October 13, 2011.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-11-00295-CR

____________

CHRISTOPHER MOUTON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 185th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1269668

ORDER

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal 

is wholly frivolous and without merit. Appellant has made known to this court his desire 

to review the record and file a pro se brief. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); 

Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969).

Accordingly, we hereby direct the Judge of the 185th District Court to afford 

appellant an opportunity to view the trial record in accordance with local procedure; that 

the clerk of that court furnish the record to appellant on or before October 28, 2011; that 

the clerk of that court certify to this court the date on which delivery of the record to 
2

appellant is made; and that appellant file his pro se brief with this court within thirty days 

of that date.

PER CURIAM
No. 12-5785.

#### Moore *v.*Michigan.

Ct. App. Mich. Certio-rari denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 218 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 218

       Making minority party appointments for the 111th Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 21, 2009

Mr. McConnell submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
       Making minority party appointments for the 111th Congress.

    Resolved, That the following be the minority membership on the 
following committees for the remainder of the 111th Congress, or until 
their successors are appointed:
    Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry: Mr. Chambliss, 
Mr. Lugar, Mr. Cochran, Mr. McConnell, Mr. Roberts, Mr. Johanns, Mr. 
Grassley, Mr. Thune, and Mr. Cornyn.
    Committee on Foreign Relations: Mr. Lugar, Mr. Corker, Mr. Isakson, 
Mr. Risch, Mr. DeMint, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. Wicker, and Mr. Inhofe.
    Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs: Ms. 
Collins, Mr. Coburn, Mr. McCain, Mr. Voinovich, Mr. Ensign, Mr. Graham, 
and Mr. Bennett.
    Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship: Ms. Snowe, Mr. 
Bond, Mr. Vitter, Mr. Thune, Mr. Enzi, Mr. Isakson, Mr. Wicker, and Mr. 
Risch.
    Special Committee on Aging: Mr. Martinez, Mr. Shelby, Ms. Collins, 
Mr. Corker, Mr. Hatch, Mr. Brownback, Mr. Graham, and Mr. Chambliss.
                                 <all>
```