alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 67 (Tuesday, April 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 16802]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-8881]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. EG97-48-000]


NRGenerating Holdings (No. 4) B.V.; Notice of Amended Application 
of NRGenerating Holdings (No. 4) B.V. for Expedited New Determination 
of Exempt Wholesale Generator Status

April 2, 1997.
    On March 31, 1997, NRGenerating Holdings (No. 4) B.V. 
(``Applicant'') applied for a new determination that it will be an 
``exempt wholesale generator'' (``EWG'') within the meaning of Section 
32(a)(1) of PUHCA (the ``Application''). On April 2, 1997, Applicant 
amended (the ``Amended Application'') its initial application to submit 
additional information. As stated in the Application and the Amended 
Application, Applicant has joined a consortium which intends, by April 
17, 1997, to submit a bid to purchase all of the shares and assets of 
Loy Yang Power Corporation Ltd. (``Loy Yang A''), currently wholly-
owned by the State of Victoria, Australia. Loy Yang A owns an electric 
generating facility (the ``Facility'') and an adjacent coal mine 
located in Victoria, Australia. Loy Yang A would also serve as the 
primary operator of the Facility, although it will subcontract or 
assign certain aspects of its responsibilities as operator to 
affiliates or subsidiaries of various consortium members. If the 
consortium's bid is successful, Applicant, through one or more 
affiliates, will become an owner and operator of the Facility.
    Any person desiring to be heard concerning the application for 
exempt wholesale generator status should file a motion to intervene or 
comments with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 
214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 
and 18 CFR 385.214). The Commission will limit its consideration of 
comments to those that concern the adequacy or accuracy of the 
application. All such motions and comments should be filed on or before 
April 14, 1997, and must be served on the Applicant. Any person wishing 
to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this 
filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public 
inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-8881 Filed 4-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
### Revisions to the Implications of Increasing Light Tight Oil Production for U.S. Refining

May 12, 2015

-  Corrections made to Tables III-21 and III-26
No. 12-5270.

#### Cardona *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
U.S. Energy Information Administration | Quarterly Coal Report, January - March 2024

Table 37. U.S. coal stocks, 2018 - 2024

(thousand short tons)

Coal consumers

Last day of quarter

Electric

power

sector 1

Coke

plants

Other

industrial 2

Commercial

and

institutional

users

Total

Coal producers

and

distributors Total

2018

March 31 126,008 1,508 2,891 275 130,682 24,736 155,418

June 30 121,041 1,616 2,896 256 125,809 22,997 148,806

September 30 100,384 1,811 3,023 260 105,478 22,537 128,015

December 31 102,793 1,807 3,258 247 108,104 21,692 129,796

2019

March 31 96,932 2,005 2,832 221 101,990 24,160 126,150

June 30 116,875 2,296 2,985 201 122,358 24,529 146,887

September 30 110,615 2,463 3,168 232 116,478 27,714 144,192

December 31 128,102 2,333 3,258 246 133,940 31,320 165,260

2020

March 31 145,034 2,148 3,020 212 150,413 30,829 181,242

June 30 149,935 2,022 3,019 213 155,189 29,510 184,699

September 30 127,902 1,975 2,907 234 133,018 25,537 158,555

December 31 131,431 1,654 2,848 250 136,182 23,640 159,822

2021

March 31 109,614 1,545 2,538 229 113,926 22,629 136,555

June 30 108,678 1,853 2,625 210 113,366 22,361 135,727

September 30 77,476 1,794 2,636 201 82,107 19,042 101,149

December 31 91,884 1,658 2,624 176 96,343 19,013 115,356

2022

March 31 86,143 1,590 2,404 157 90,294 19,674 109,968

June 30 86,869 1,620 2,374 158 91,021 20,597 111,618

September 30 79,354 1,646 2,529 187 83,717 20,445 104,162

December 31 88,861 1,627 2,499 167 93,153 20,820 113,973

2023

March 31 109,004 1,650 2,451 162 113,267 22,390* 135,657

June 30 127,710 1,684 2,765 160 132,319 22,092* 154,411

September 30 116,635 1,655 2,750 168 121,207 18,506* 139,713

December 31 131,426 1,551 2,868 149 135,995 18,427* 154,422

2024

March 31 133,607 1,447 2,789 131 137,975 19,989* 157,964

1 The electric power sector (electric utilities and independent power producers) comprises electricity-only and combined-heat-and-power (CHP) plants whose primary

business is to sell electricity, or electricity and heat, to the public (i.e. NAICS 22 plants).

2 Manufacturing plants only.

* Estimated.

- = No data reported.

Note: Beginning in 1999, the first three quarters of each year's data for Coal Producers and Distributors are estimated. Electric power sector stocks include anthracite,

bituminous coal, sub-bituminous coal, and lignite, and exclude waste coal. Total may not equal sum of components because of independent rounding.

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). *Electric Power Sector: Form EIA-923, 'Power Plant Operations Report.' *Coke Plants: Form EIA-3, 'Quarterly Survey

of Industrial, Commercial & Institutional Coal Users.' *Other Industrial and Commercial and Institutional Users: Form EIA-3, 'Quarterly Survey of Industrial,

Commercial & Institutional Coal Users.' *Producers and Distributors: 'Short Term Energy Outlook' estimates, Form EIA-7A, 'Annual Survey of Coal Production and

Preparation,' and Form EIA-8A, 'Annual Survey of Coal Stocks and Coal Exports.' Prior to third quarter 2014, coke plant data was collected under Form EIA-5, 'Quarterly

Coal Consumption and Quality Report - Coke Plants.'
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Lawson Software, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period
ended May 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Harry Debes, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



/s/ HARRY DEBES Harry Debes President, Chief Executive Officer, and DirectorJuly 15, 2010


---
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 559 

Observing the historical significance of Juneteenth Independence Day. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 16, 2010 

Mr. BURRIS (for himself, Mr. DURBIN, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. 

LUGAR, Mr. HARKIN, Ms. MIKULSKI, Mrs. LINCOLN, Ms. LANDRIEU, and 

Mr. CARDIN) submitted the following resolution; which was considered 

and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Observing the historical significance of Juneteenth 

Independence Day. 

Whereas news of the end of slavery did not reach frontier 

areas of the United States, and in particular the southwestern States, for more than 21⁄2 years after President 

Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation, which was issued 

on January 1, 1863, and months after the conclusion of 

the Civil War; 

Whereas, on June 19, 1865, Union soldiers led by Major 

General Gordon Granger arrived in Galveston, Texas 

with news that the Civil War had ended and that the 

enslaved were free; 

Whereas African-Americans who had been slaves in the 

Southwest celebrated June 19, commonly known as 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 559 ATS 

‘‘Juneteenth Independence Day’’, as the anniversary of 

their emancipation; 

Whereas African-Americans from the Southwest continue the 

tradition of celebrating Juneteenth Independence Day as 

inspiration and encouragement for future generations; 

Whereas, for more than 140 years, Juneteenth Independence 

Day celebrations have been held to honor African-American freedom while encouraging self-development and respect for all cultures; 

Whereas, although Juneteenth Independence Day is beginning to be recognized as a national, and even global, 

event, the history behind the celebration should not be 

forgotten; and 

Whereas the faith and strength of character demonstrated by 

former slaves remains an example for all people of the 

United States, regardless of background, religion, or 

race: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That— 

2 (1) the Senate— 

3 (A) recognizes the historical significance of 

4 Juneteenth Independence Day to the Nation; 

5 (B) supports the continued celebration of 

6 Juneteenth Independence Day to provide an op7 portunity for the people of the United States to 

8 learn more about the past and to understand 

9 better the experiences that have shaped the Na10 tion; and 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 559 ATS 

1 (C) encourages the people of the United 

2 States to observe Juneteenth Independence Day 

3 with appropriate ceremonies, activities, and pro4 grams; and 

5 (2) it is the sense of the Senate that— 

6 (A) the celebration of the end of slavery is 

7 an important and enriching part of the history 

8 and heritage of the United States; and 

9 (B) history should be regarded as a means 

10 for understanding the past and solving the chal11 lenges of the future. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.45


                               MODIFICATION AGREEMENT

         This Modification Agreement is entered into as of January 1, 2002 by
and between SmartGate. L.C., a Florida limited liability company ("SmartGate")
and Edmund C. King ("Borrower").

                                    RECITALS

         WHEREAS, on December 29, 1999 Borrower issued a Promissory Note to
SmartGate in connection with Borrower's exercise of a SmartGate stock option
("Promissory Note"); and

         WHEREAS, the parties wish to modify the repayment terms of the
Promissory Note as set forth herein below.

         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises made herein,
and for other good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby
acknowledged by each party, the parties, intending to be legally bound, hereby
agree that the Promissory Note is amended as follows:

         1.       The repayment terms set forth in the second sentence of the
first paragraph of the Promissory Note are hereby modified by replacing the
second sentence with the following:

         "Principal and interest shall be repaid on December 29, 2007. It shall
         be permissible for Borrower to prepay this Promissory Note at any time
         prior to December 29, 2007 provided such prepayment includes a payment
         of all interest accrued through December 29, 2007, notwithstanding the
         earlier payment if prepaid."

         2.       The Promissory Note is further modified by modifying the last
sentence in the second paragraph of the Promissory Note regarding the manner of
repayment by replacing the last sentence with the following:

         "This Promissory Note shall be repaid in U.S. currency."

         3.       All provisions of the Promissory Note, other than as modified
herein, shall remain in full force and effect.

         The parties have executed this Modification Agreement as of the date
first above written.


SmartGate, L.C.                              Borrower


By: /s/ Stephen A. Michael, President        /s/ Edmund C. King
   ------------------------------------      ----------------------------------
   Stephen A. Michael, President


<PAGE>

                    FILING SCHEDULE PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH 2.
   INSTRUCTIONS TO ITEM 601 UNDER SECTION 229.601 EXHIBITS OF REGULATION S-K


         Modification Agreements, substantially identical in all material
respects except for the name of the borrower and the date in paragraph 1 were
entered into between SmartGate and the below described "Borrowers":

         Scott Tannehill
         Barbara J. Baker
         Nicole A. Longridge

         The date in paragraph 1 for these Borrowers was December 29, 2004.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 20-61067

Summary Calendar

Leonard Ataubo, 

Petitioner,

versus

Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, 

Respondent.

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A215 817 642

Before Barksdale, Willett, and Duncan, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Leonard Ataubo, a native and citizen of Cameroon, petitions for 

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) dismissing his appeal of 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 22, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 20-61067 Document: 00516211871 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/22/2022
No. 20-61067

2

an Immigration Judge’s (IJ) denying his application for asylum, withholding 

of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). 

In reviewing the BIA’s decision, the IJ’s decision is considered only 

to the extent it influenced the BIA. Singh v. Sessions, 880 F.3d 220, 224 (5th 

Cir. 2018). Questions of law are reviewed de novo; factual findings, for 

substantial evidence. Lopez-Gomez v. Ashcroft, 263 F.3d 442, 444 (5th Cir. 

2001) (per curiam). 

The injuries or threats received by Ataubo do not constitute the 

requisite persecution necessary for asylum. See Eduard v. Ashcroft, 379 F.3d 

182, 187–88 (5th Cir. 2004) (noting “[n]either discrimination nor 

harassment ordinarily amounts to persecution under the INA”); TamaraGomez v. Gonzales, 447 F.3d 343, 348–49 (5th Cir. 2006) (finding petitioner 

that presented evidence of multiple threats “made a compelling case of 

persecution”). 

To the extent Ataubo summarily challenges denial of withholding of 

removal, his challenge is abandoned because he fails to brief it. E.g., Hollis v. 

Lynch, 827 F.3d 436, 451 (5th Circ. 2016). 

To obtain CAT relief, applicant must show, inter alia, it is more likely 

than not that, if returned to his home country, he will be tortured with 

government acquiescence or involvement. 8 C.F.R. §§ 1208.16(c)(2) 

(prescribing eligibility for withholding of removal under CAT), 1208.18(a)(1) 

(defining torture as act performed with “consent or acquiescence of” public 

official). The BIA’s decision that Ataubo failed to meet this standard is

supported by substantial evidence. 

Ataubo’s other raised issues—a due-process claim and challenges

regarding the persecution standard, his fear-of-future-persecution claim, and 

application of the country-condition report to his CAT claim—are dismissed 

because they are unexhausted. See Omari v. Holder, 562 F.3d 314, 321 (5th 

Case: 20-61067 Document: 00516211871 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/22/2022
No. 20-61067

3

Cir. 2009) (emphasizing “parties must fairly present an issue to the BIA to 

satisfy [18 U.S.C.] § 1252(d)’s exhaustion requirement”).

DISMISSED IN PART; DENIED IN PART.

Case: 20-61067 Document: 00516211871 Page: 3 Date Filed: 02/22/2022
EX-4.1





 Exhibit 4.1 
  

 
 



 












 THE SECURITIES REPRESENTED HEREBY HAVE BEEN ACQUIRED FOR INVESTMENT AND HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE
SECURITIES ACT OF 1933. SUCH SHARES MAY NOT BE SOLD, PLEDGED, OR TRANSFERRED IN THE ABSENCE OF SUCH REGISTRATION OR A VALID EXEMPTION FROM THE REGISTRATION AND PROSPECTUS DELIVERY REQUIREMENTS OF SAID ACT. 

THE SECURITIES REPRESENTED HEREBY MAY BE TRANSFERRED ONLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COMPANY AND THE STOCKHOLDER, A COPY OF
WHICH IS ON FILE WITH THE SECRETARY OF THE COMPANY. 
  

									
	  

	The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations:
		  		  	UTMA – 	 	                             Custodian    
                         
	TEN COM	  	– as tenants in common	  		 	
(Cust)                      
                       (Minor)

				
	TEN ENT	  	– as tenants by entireties	  		 	      under Uniform Transfers to Minors
				
	JT TEN	  	– as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as    tenants in common	  		 	Act                                
                                         
         (State)
	Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list.
	  


 For value received
                     hereby sell, assign, and transfer unto 
  

			
	   PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER

IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE
	 	
	             

            
	 	 

  
  

(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS INCLUDING POSTAL ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE) 

 
  
  

 

                         
                                         
                                         
                                         
                                         
                                         
   Shares of the capital stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and
appoint                                        
                               
                                        
                                         
                                         
           Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the within-named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. 

 

					
	Dated                     	  		  	 X

			
		  		  	 X

		  		  	NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.

 SIGNATURE GUARANTEED 

			
	ALL GUARANTEES MUST BE MADE BY A FINANCIAL INSTITUTION (SUCH AS A BANK OR BROKER) WHICH IS A PARTICIPANT IN THE SECURITIES TRANSFER AGENTS MEDALLION PROGRAM (“STAMP”), THE
NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE, INC. MEDALLION SIGNATURE PROGRAM (“MSP”), OR THE STOCK EXCHANGES MEDALLION PROGRAM (“SEMP”) AND MUST NOT BE DATED. GUARANTEES BY A NOTARY PUBLIC ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE.
No. 12-109.

#### Enriquez *v.*Virginia.

Sup. Ct. Va. Certiorari denied.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Kanai Sciences, Inc. (the "Company") on
      Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael Weiser,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






/s/ Michael
              WeiserMichael WeiserPrincipal Executive
              OfficerMarch 30,
              2006
<PAGE>
 
                                  EXHIBIT 23

                            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
                         CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit (23)


                            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
                         CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


Rowe Furniture Corporation
Salem, Virginia

   We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our reports dated
January 5, 1996, relating to the consolidated financial statement and schedules
of Rowe Furniture Corporation appearing in the Company's Annual Report on form
10-K for the year ended December 3, 1995 into the Company's previously filed
registration statements file numbers 2-94943, 33-90486, 33-77766, and 33-77768.



High Point, North Carolina                            /s/ BDO SEIDMAN, LLP
                                                      --------------------
February 23, 1996                                     BDO SEIDMAN, LLP

                                      27
# tableES1
#### In re Tax Appeal of Krueger.

111,216

07/24/2015

Denied.

Unpublished
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            THE LUBRIZOL CORPORATION
     Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
           The Lubrizol Corporation Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

I certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of The Lubrizol Corporation for the period ending March 31, 2005:

     (1)  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of The Lubrizol Corporation.


/s/ James L. Hambrick
-------------------------------------
James L. Hambrick
Chief Executive Officer and President
May 5, 2005


I certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of The Lubrizol Corporation for the period ending March 31, 2005:

     (1)  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of The Lubrizol Corporation.


/s/ Charles P. Cooley
-------------------------------------
Charles P. Cooley
Chief Financial Officer
May 5, 2005