alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

Exhibit 23
----------

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
Royal Appliance Mfg. Co. on Form S-8 (File No. 33-44802) of our reports dated
March 7, 2000, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements and
financial statement schedule of Royal Appliance Mfg. Co. and Subsidiaries as of
December 31, 1999 and 1998, and for the years ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and
1997, which reports are included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



                                                      PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP



Cleveland, Ohio
March 16, 2000




                                       40
##### 



Exhibit 31(a) CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Ronald M. Moquist, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Raven
Industries, Inc. (the Registrant);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this annual report; and3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;4.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and we have:  a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,
or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the Registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this annual report is being prepared;b.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the
Registrants internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal year that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Registrants internal control over financial
reporting;  5.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit
committee of Registrants board of directors (or others performing
the equivalent function):  a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize
and report information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in
the Registrants internal controls over financial reporting. Date: March 31, 2004
    /s/ Ronald M. MoquistRonald M. MoquistPresident and Chief Executive
Officer
#### Schilling v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue

109,743

06/29/2015

Denied. ..

Unpublished
No. 12-5618.

#### Sheppard *v.*Florida.

Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 3d Dist. Certiorari denied.
No. 12-6183.

#### Avitia-Guillen *v.*United States.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

JAMES CEASAR,

Petitioner

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 25 EM 2023

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 5 th day of September , 2023, the Petition for Extraordinary Relief

is DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         687,805
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,875,649
<ALLOWANCES>                                   272,991
<INVENTORY>                                  2,715,687
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,200,757
<PP&E>                                       1,982,020
<DEPRECIATION>                                 979,849
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,737,129
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,727,558
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       225,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,553,271
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,737,129
<SALES>                                     23,685,512
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            23,685,512
<CGS>                                        7,845,556
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               21,984,216
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             479,850
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,258,070
<INCOME-TAX>                                   551,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            707,070
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   707,070
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .79
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .79
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.6


 


August 6, 2002


 


Private & Confidential


 


Mr. Michael P. Scarpelli


 


Re:          Employment with HPL


 


Dear Mike:


 


The Board of Directors of HPL Technologies, Inc. has approved the
following modifications to your employment arrangement:


 


1.               Title, Reporting Duties and Responsibilities.  Effective July 19, 2002, you title will be
Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President of Administration.  You will report directly to the CEO.  In the absence of a CEO, you will report
directly into the Board of Directors.


2.               Salary and Bonus.  Your monthly salary will increase from
$18,750.00 to $20,833.33 ($250,000 on an annual basis).   You will also receive an automatic
guaranteed bonus of $100,000 payable 50% on January 18, 2003 and 50% on July18,
2003.  In the event that a Corporate
Transaction (as defined in Section 10.2(a) of the Company’s 2001 Equity
Incentive Plan (the “Plan”)) occurs, you will be entitled to the immediate
payment of the balance of any unpaid guaranteed bonus.


3.               Corporate Transaction.  In the event of a Corporate Transaction (as
defined in Section 10.2(a) of the Plan) occurs and the acquiring or successor
company does not offer you a comparable employment position, you shall be
entitled to a severance payment of 50% of your annual salary.


 


All other terms and conditions of your employment letter dated December
9, 2001 remain in effect.


 


Sincerely,


 


	
  /s/ Elie Antoun

  	
   

  
	
  Elie Antoun

  	
   

  
	
  Chairman of the Board
  of Directors and

  Interim Chief Executive Officer
1 

### L EVI N

, N A NCY

F r om: Ru i z

, G abe @A R B < gabe. r u i z @ a r b. c a.go v>

S e nt: T hu rs da y

, S epte m be r 03, 2015 5:00 PM

T o: L EV IN, N A NCY

S ub jec t: F W : S J V L iv e s to c k A mm on i a E m i ss i on s w i th and w i thout Ru l e 4570

N a n c y

,

I m e a n t t o s e nd t h is t o y o u

.

--Ga b e

F r o m: R u iz, G a b e @ A R B

S e n t: T hu rsd a y

, S e p tem b e r 03

, 2 0 15 4 : 58 P M

T o: R u iz, G a b e @ A R B

C c: Bil a n d

, L a rr y ( Bil a n d

. L a rr y@ e p a

. g o v ); S te c k e l. A n d r ew @ e p a .gov

S u b j e c t: S JV L i v e s t o c k Amm o n i a Em issio n s w i t h a n d w i t h o u t R u l e 4 5 7 0

N a n c y et

. al

. ,

T h e t a b l e b e l o w s h o w s t h e a m mo n ia e m issi o n p r o j e c t i o n s f o r t h e li v e s t o c k ca t e go ri e s i n t h e S a n J o a qu i n Val l ey w i t h a nd

w i t h o u t t h e e m issi o n r e du c t i o n s f r o m D is t ric t R u l e 4 57 0

, as calc u la t e d fr o m t h e 2 0 1 2 P M 2

. 5 S I P i n v e n t o r y t o o l

.

SJV L iv e s t o c k Wa s t e A mm on i a E m i s s i on s ( t on s / da y)

S o u rc e : 2 0 1 2 P M 2

. 5 SI P I n v e n t o r y

, N o rCal V

. 1

. 03

S OURCE C A T EG O R Y 2 0 1 1

E m iss i o ns 2 0 12 E m i ssi o ns

Wi t h o ut

R u l e Wi t h

R u l e

D air y Ca tt le 2 1 4 .8 2 2 1 .9 1 6 4 .9

Ra ng e Ca tt le 20 .3 20 .3 20 .3

F ee d l o t Ca tt le 39 .8 39 .8 29 .5

Po u l t r y

, B r o il e rs 5 .6 5 .6 5 .6

Po u l t r y

, L a y e rs 2 .9 2 .9 2 .3

Po u l t r y

, T u rk e ys 19 .4 19 .4 16 .3

S w i ne 9 .0 9 .0 7 .1

Sh eep 3 .1 3 .1 3 .1

H o rs es 1 .3 1 .3 1 .3

G o a t s And O t h e rs 0 .6 0 .6 0 .6

T O T AL 3 1 6 .8 3 2 3 .8 2 5 0 .9

P l e a s e n o te t h a t t h e e arl i e r i n v e n t o r y f o r t h e D is t r i c t ’ s 2 0 08 P M2

. 5 h a d a h i gh e r b as e li n e e s t i m a t e o f 3 81 t o n s / d a y i n

2 0 12

, a nd if y o u we r e t o a p p l y t h e e m issi o n r e du c t i o n fac t o r s fr om t h e r u l e

, t h e 2 0 1 2 e m iss i o n s w i t h r u l e w o u l d h a v e

b ee n 2 9 1 t o n s / d a y

. I ’ m p o i n t i ng t h is o u t b e ca u s e I t h i n k i t ’ll b e cri t ica l t h a t y o u u s e t h e s a m e b a s e li n e i n v e n t o r y i n y o u r

a n al y sis a s t h e D is t r i c t d i d. Le t m e k n o w if y o u h a v e a n y o t h e r qu e s t i o n s

.

--Ga b e2 F r o m: R u iz, G a b e @ A R B

S e n t: T u e sd a y

, S e p tem b e r 01

, 2 0 15 1 1 : 0 2 A M

T o: L EV I N

, N A N C Y

( L e v i n. N a n cy @ e p a .gov )

S u b j e c t: S JV R u l e 4 5 70 C o n t rol P ro f il e

N a n c y

,

P e r o u r ph o n e c o n v e rsa t i o n

, h e r e ’s t h e S a n J o a qu i n V all ey c o n t r o l p r o fil e f o r D is t ric t R u l e 4 5 7 0

. L et m e k n o w if y o u h a v e

a n y qu e s t i o n s o r n e e d a n y a dd i t i o n al i n f o r m a t i o n

.

Ga b e R u i z

, M a n a g e r

E m iss i o n s In v e n t o r y F o r e c a s t i ng & Sp e cia l P r o j e c t s S e c t i o n

Calif o r n ia A ir R e s o u rc e s B o ar d

9 1 6

- 3 22

- 7 6 7 3
EXHIBIT 99.1


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                       OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Longview Fibre Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-Q"), I,
R. H. Wollenberg, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section
         13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
         or 78o(d)); and

(2)      The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
         of the Company.

Dated:  June 12, 2003


R. H. WOLLENBERG
R. H. WOLLENBERG
President and Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Longview Fibre Company and will be retained by Longview Fibre
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 366 

Extending condolences to the families of Sergeant Mark Renninger, Officer 

Tina Griswold, Officer Ronald Owens, and Officer Greg Richards. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 2, 2009 

Mrs. MURRAY (for herself and Ms. CANTWELL) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Extending condolences to the families of Sergeant Mark 

Renninger, Officer Tina Griswold, Officer Ronald Owens, 

and Officer Greg Richards. 

Whereas on the morning of November 29, 2009, 4 members 

of the Lakewood Police Department were slain by gunfire 

in a senseless act of violence while preparing for their 

shift in Lakewood, Washington; 

Whereas the 4 officers have been members of the Lakewood 

Police Department since its founding 5 years ago, were 

valuable members of the community, and were deeply respected for their service; 

Whereas Sergeant Mark Renninger, who served 13 years in 

law enforcement, first with the Tukwila Police Department and most recently with the Lakewood Police Department, is survived by his wife and 3 children; 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 366 ATS 

Whereas Officer Tina Griswold, who served 14 years in law 

enforcement, first with the Lacey Police Department and 

most recently with the Lakewood Police Department, is 

survived by her husband and 2 children; 

Whereas Officer Ronald Owens, who served 12 years in law 

enforcement, first with the Washington State Patrol and 

most recently with the Lakewood Police Department, is 

survived by his daughter; 

Whereas Officer Greg Richards, who served 8 years in law 

enforcement, first with the Kent Police Department and 

most recently with the Lakewood Police Department, is 

survived by his wife and 3 children; 

Whereas the senseless violence against and murder of law enforcement officers, who are sworn to serve, protect, and 

preserve the peace of the communities, is a particularly 

heinous crime; and 

Whereas in the face of this senseless tragedy, the people of 

the City of Lakewood, the surrounding communities, and 

the State of Washington have come together in support 

of the law enforcement community and the families of the 

victims: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) extends its condolences to the families of 

3 Sergeant Mark Renninger, Officer Tina Griswold, 

4 Officer Ronald Owens, and Officer Greg Richards; 

5 and 

6 (2) stands with the people of Lakewood, Wash7 ington, the men and women of the Lakewood Police 

8 Department, and members of the law enforcement 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 366 ATS 

1 community as they celebrate the lives and mourn the 

2 loss of these 4 dedicated public servants and law en3 forcement heroes. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Sheet and the Consolidated Statement of Operations filed as
part of the annual report on Form 10-K and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such annual report on Form 10-K.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                               <C>   
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                     JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                       DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                                  21,385
<SECURITIES>                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          188,170
<ALLOWANCES>                                             4,940
<INVENTORY>                                            161,294
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       391,469
<PP&E>                                                  73,077
<DEPRECIATION>                                          32,384
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         486,670
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  213,174
<BONDS>                                                114,186
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<COMMON>                                                 2,587
<OTHER-SE>                                             145,408
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           486,670
<SALES>                                                700,408
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       700,872
<CGS>                                                  429,334
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          429,334
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       241,709
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         2,743
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      17,920
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          9,166
<INCOME-TAX>                                             4,836
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      4,330
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                             4,330
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                              .37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              .36
        

</TABLE>
No. 12-159.

#### Williams et ux. *v.*JPMorgan Chase Bank et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 15

                                                                November 5, 2002


Accountants' Acknowledgment

         We acknowledge the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (Form S-8 No. 33-78340, No. 333-41379 and No. 333-45524) of
OptimumCare Corporation of our report dated November 5, 2002 with respect to the
condensed consolidated financial statements of OptimumCare Corporation which
appears on page 3 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2002.

                                      /s/ Lesley, Thomas, Schwarz & Postma, Inc.
                                          A Professional Accountancy Corporation
                                                      Newport Beach, California.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6751

MICHAEL ANTHONY DAMMONS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

THOMAS R. CARROLL, Superintendent Johnston

Correctional Institute,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr.,

District Judge. (1:05-cv-00642-JAM)

Submitted: August 31, 2006 Decided: September 7, 2006

Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bruce Tracy Cunningham, Jr., THE LAW OFFICE OF BRUCE T. CUNNINGHAM,

JR., Southern Pines, North Carolina, for Appellant. Clarence Joe

DelForge, III, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Michael Anthony Dammons seeks to appeal the district

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge

and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Dammons has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21
                                                                      ----------

                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT*
                           ---------------------------

                                          STATE OR
                                        JURISDICTION OF     PERCENT OF
              NAME**                    INCORPORATION       OWNERSHIP
              ------                    -------------       ---------

The Little Tikes Company                Ohio                   100%
Graco Children's Products Inc.          Delaware               100%
Rubbermaid Commercial Products Inc.     Delaware               100%
Rubbermaid Office Products Inc.         Delaware               100%
Rubbermaid Specialty Products Inc.      Delaware               100%
Rubbermaid Canada Inc.                  Ontario, Canada        100%

*   All of the listed subsidiaries are included in Registrant's consolidated
    financial statements.

**  All subsidiaries conduct their businesses under the names shown.
#### State v. Dixon

105,683

09/04/13

Denied. ...

Unpublished
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 30, 2013

s0923 

# Order

Clerk September 30, 2013

147034

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHI GAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 147034

COA: 310385

Kent CC: 08

- 002691

- FH

GLENN SCOTT IDALSKI,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 11, 2013 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 68 (Wednesday, April 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 17180]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-9087]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force


HQ USAF Scientific Advisory Board Meeting

    The 1997 Summer Study Panel Meeting on Technology Thrust of the HQ 
USAF Scientific Advisory Board will meet on May 29, 1997 at the ANSER 
Corporation, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA from 8 a.m. to 
5 p.m.
    The purpose of the meeting is to gather information and receive 
briefing for the 1997 Summer Study topic on Expeditionary Forces.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with section 
552b of Title 5, United States Code, specifically subparagraphs (1) and 
(4) thereof.
    For further information, contact the HQ USAF Scientific Advisory 
Board Secretariat at (703) 697-8404.
Carolyn A. Lunsford,
Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-9087 Filed 4-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3910-01-P