alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1CERTIFICATIONSI, Ron E. Hooper, certify that1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Marine Petroleum Trust for which Bankof America, N.A. acts as Trustee; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; andc) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.   Date: November 14, 2007 /s/ Ron E. Hooper     Ron E. Hooper
#### State v. Petty

105,251

10/17/13

Denied.

Unpublished
# C_2018362EN.01000801.xml

| 8.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 362/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.10.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 362/8

---

Commission information notice pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 362/07)

| Member State | Italy |
| --- | --- |
| Route concerned | Cagliari-Rome Fiumicino and vice versa |
| Period of validity of the contract | From 1 April 2019 to 31 March 2022 |
| Deadline for submission of tenders | Two months after the date of publication of this notice |
| Address from which the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained | Autonomous Region of Sardinia |
| Department of Transport |
| Directorate-General for Transport |
| Service for Maritime and Air Transport and Territorial Continuity |
| Via XXIX Novembre 1847, 27 - 41 |
| 09123 Cagliari |
| ITALIA |
| Tel. +39 0706067331 |
| Fax +39 0706067309 |
| Internet: http://www.regione.sardegna.it |
| Email | : | trasporti@pec.regione.sardegna.it
  trasporti@regione.sardegna.it
  trasp.osp@regione.sardegna.it |

Member State

Italy

Route concerned

Cagliari-Rome Fiumicino and vice versa

Period of validity of the contract

From 1 April 2019 to 31 March 2022

Deadline for submission of tenders

Two months after the date of publication of this notice

Address from which the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained

Autonomous Region of Sardinia

Department of Transport

Directorate-General for Transport

Service for Maritime and Air Transport and Territorial Continuity

Via XXIX Novembre 1847, 27 - 41

09123 Cagliari

ITALIA

Tel. +39 0706067331

Fax +39 0706067309

Internet: http://www.regione.sardegna.it

Email

:

trasporti@pec.regione.sardegna.it

trasporti@regione.sardegna.it

trasp.osp@regione.sardegna.it

---
#### Hodes & Nauser, MDs v. Schmidt

114,153

04/11/2016

Granted.

52 Kan. App. 2d 274
#### State v. Shirley

112,398

03/31/2016

Denied.

Unpublished
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 73 (Wednesday, April 16, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 18518]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-9542]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

31 CFR Part 4


Employees' Personal Property Claims

AGENCY: Department of the Treasury.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Treasury is amending its regulations to 
set forth policies and procedures for reimbursing employees for 
personal items that are lost, stolen, or damaged during the performance 
of an employee's official duty.

DATES: This rule is effective as a final rule on April 16, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dana Thibeau, Office of Accounting and 
Internal Controls, Room 2301, 1310 G Street, NW., Washington, DC 20220. 
Telephone Number (202) 622-0811.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The Department of the Treasury established TD 32-13 and TD P 32-13 
to set forth policies and procedures for reimbursing employees for 
personal items that are lost, stolen, or damaged during the performance 
of an employee's official duty. Previously, Treasury established the 
policy and procedures for employee's personal property claims in 31 CFR 
part 4. The newly established documents supersede part 4.

Administrative Procedure Act

    Because this rule relates to agency management and personnel, 
notice and public procedure and a delayed effective date are not 
required pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(2).

Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review

    This rule is limited to agency organization, management and 
personnel matters; therefore, it is not subject to Executive Order 
12866.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

    Because no notice of proposed rulemaking is required, the 
provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) do 
not apply.

List of Subjects in 31 CFR Part 4

    Government employees.

    Dated: March 19, 1997.
George Munoz,
Assistant Secretary (Management) and Chief Financial Officer.

    For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 31 CFR part 4 is revised 
to read as follows:

PART 4--EMPLOYEES' PERSONAL PROPERTY CLAIMS


Sec. 4.1   Procedures.

    The procedures for filing a claim with the Treasury Department for 
personal property that is lost or damaged incident to service are 
contained in Treasury Directive 32-13, ``Claims for Loss or Damage to 
Personal Property,'' and Treasury Department Publication 32-13, 
``Policies and Procedures For Employees' Claim for Loss or Damage to 
Personal Property Incident to Service.''

    Authority: 31 U.S.C. 3721(j).

[FR Doc. 97-9542 Filed 4-15-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-25-P
# Table 10.22

# RSE 10.22
# Table 8.3

# RSE 8.3

# Microsoft_Word_Document1.docx

# image1.emf

# Microsoft_Word_Document2.docx

# image2.emf
# Table 7.3

# RSE 7.3

# Microsoft_Word_Document1.docx

# image1.emf

# Microsoft_Word_Document2.docx

# image2.emf
No. 12-134.

#### Hayes *v.*City of Chicago, Illinois.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>    5
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                              6,000
<SECURITIES>                                        9,100
<RECEIVABLES>                                     108,700
<ALLOWANCES>                                        2,100
<INVENTORY>                                        25,500
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  173,100
<PP&E>                                          3,188,100
<DEPRECIATION>                                  1,531,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  1,862,800
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             239,900
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                            1,800
<OTHER-SE>                                        739,400
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    1,862,800
<SALES>                                           509,500
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  510,300
<CGS>                                             639,100
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     639,100
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 37,600
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (165,300)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (44,600)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (120,700)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   (4,200)
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (124,900)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (0.82)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (0.82)


</TABLE>
Exhibit
        32.2
  CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
  In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of International Automated Systems,
        Inc.
        (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal period ending December 31, 2006,
        as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
        “Report”), I, LaGrand T. Johnson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
        certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
        906
        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
        belief:
  (1)
              the
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
 
 (2)
              the
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                  Company.
 
 
 /s/
        LaGrand T.
        Johnson
 
 LaGrand
        T. Johnson
 Chief
        Financial Officer
 
 February
        13, 2007
#### State v. Vap

111,798

06/21/2016

Denied.

Unpubhshed
#### State v. Preece

108,211

108,212

108,213

108,214

11/04/13

Denied.

Unpublished
#### State v. Sanchez

108,919

02/12/14

Denied.

Unpublished
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> UT

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      277,657
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                          0
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          61,412
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                         4,821
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 234,713
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 578,603
<COMMON>                                             0
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      225,667
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            (3,909)
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 221,758
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           120,000
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              60,820
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                      100,000
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                        0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                        620
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                   573
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                  74,832
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  578,603
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      129,275
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             4,143
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     110,304
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     114,447
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         14,828
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 278
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  15,106
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        13,205
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,901
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                    1,901
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         6,039
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        6,400
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                           (415)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00


</TABLE>
October 31, 2013



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

ALIEF INDEPENDENT SC HOOL DISTRICT, DAN T URNER AND HENRY BONAPARTE , Appellant s
NO. 14

- 12

- 00532

- CV V.

TROY PERRY , Appellee

________________________________ This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, Troy Perry, signed May 7, 2012, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED

. We order appellant s , Alief Independent School District, Dan Turner and Henry Bonaparte, jointly and severally, to pay all costs incurred in this appeal.

We further order this decision c ertified below for observance.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES THERETO AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND
1995, AND FOR EACH OF THE YEARS IN THE THREE YEAR PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          27,599
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  507,501
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,900
<INVENTORY>                                    276,811
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               856,720
<PP&E>                                       1,336,134
<DEPRECIATION>                                 614,220
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,053,980
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          742,821
<BONDS>                                        154,467
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       162,677
<OTHER-SE>                                     851,023
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,053,980
<SALES>                                      2,354,989
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,354,989
<CGS>                                        1,649,520
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,081,583
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,113
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,281
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                245,012
<INCOME-TAX>                                    92,614
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            152,398
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   152,398
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.01
        

</TABLE>
# m94_61
S95A1310.

#### CROWDER v. THE STATE.

(461 SE2d 865)

Decided September 11, 1995 —

Reconsideration denied October 16, 1995.

Murder. Lowndes Superior Court. Before Judge McLane.

Donald T. Crowder, *pro se.*

Hunstein, Justice.

Donald T. Crowder pled guilty to two counts of murder arid was sentenced to life imprisonment in October 1991. No appeal was taken from the conviction. In June 1993, Crowder moved pro se for an out-of-time appeal, alleging that his guilty plea was not voluntarily made and that counsel had been ineffective. The trial court denied the motion and no appeal was taken from that ruling. Crowder filed a second motion for out-of-time appeal in July 1993; that motion was denied October 1993; no appeal was taken therefrom. Crowder filed a third motion for out-of-time appeal in February 1995. The trial court denied the motion on the basis that Crowder had shown the court no reasonable grounds for the allowance of an out-of-time appeal. Crowder appeals pro se from that ruling.

While an out-of-time appeal may be appropriate where, due to error of counsel, no appeal has been taken, see *Rowland v. State,*264 Ga. 872 (2) (452 SE2d 756) (1995), that is not the case here because the issue of ineffective assistance of counsel was decided adversely to appellant in the ruling on his first motion for out-of-time appeal and that judgment is conclusive on the issue. *Hunter v. State,*260 Ga. 762 (399 SE2d 921) (1991). The trial court correctly denied Crowder’s motion for out-of-time appeal.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*720
      *H. Lamar Cole, District Attorney,*for appellee.
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 21


                                  SUBSIDIARIES

                                                      Jurisdiction of
               Name                                   Incorporation

Dirt Devil, Inc. (1)                                       Ohio

Royal Appliance Receivables, Inc. (1)                      Ohio

Royal Appliance FSC, Inc. (1)                              U.S.V.I.

Royal Appliance International Co. (1)                      Delaware

RADDCO, S.A. DE C.V. (1)                                   Mexico

Royal Vacuum Cleaner Co. (1)                               Ohio

Royal Appliance Luxembourg S.A.H. (2)                      Luxembourg

DD Interactive, Inc. (1)                                   Ohio

Privacy Technologies, Inc. (1)                             Ohio


LaunchPad Partners, Inc. (1) (3)                           Ohio


(1)      Company is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Registrant.

(2)      Company is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Royal Appliance
         International Co.

(3)      Subsequent to December 31, 2001, name changed to Product Launch
         Partners, Inc.


                                       42
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             500
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,288,036
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,287,951
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,585,987
<PP&E>                                      13,109,897
<DEPRECIATION>                             (9,707,163)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,988,721
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,397,270
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       937,385
<OTHER-SE>                                 (4,173,434)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,988,721
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,502,601
<CGS>                                       10,944,143
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,868,059
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               779,115
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             780,239
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,144,573)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,144,573)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.44)




</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 25, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-40885

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RAFAEL RODRIGUEZ-ANDRADE,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. L-01-CR-1236-ALL

--------------------

Before JONES, STEWART and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Rafael Rodriguez-Andrade appeals his conviction for illegal

reentry. He argues pursuant to the “ruse exception” of the Speedy

Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(b), that more than 30 days elapsed

between his civil detention and his indictment. 

The Speedy Trial Act, as a general rule, does not apply when

a defendant is detained on civil deportation charges. United

States v. De La Pena-Juarez, 214 F.3d 594, 597-98 (5th Cir. 2000).

We have, however, recognized an exception to that rule, the “ruse
No. 02-40885

-2-

exception,” which is applicable only if a defendant establishes

“that the primary or exclusive purpose of the civil detention was

to hold him for future criminal prosecution.” Id. at 598.

Rodriguez was arrested and detained based on a charge that he

violated the conditions of his supervised release. Therefore, the

purpose of his detention was not in anticipation of formally

charging him with the crime of illegal reentry. He has therefore

not established that illegal reentry formed the primary basis for

his civil detention and does not fall under the “ruse exception.”

AFFIRMED.
#### State v. Bryant

106,155

09/04/13

Denied

Unpublished