JUL. 22. 2 0 14 I 0 : 53 AM F A A REGIONAL COUNSEL, AEA-7 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

NO. 8784 P 2/22 

In the Matter of Mountain Air Cargo, Inc., Docket No. FAA-2014-0111, Case 

No. 2013EA680043 

MOTION FOR DECISlON 

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), by counsel, hereby files a Motion 

for Decision, pursuant to Rule 218(f)(5) of the Rules of Practice (14 C.F.R 

§13.218(f)(5)), and states as follows: 

I 

(1) Respondent, Mountain Air Cargo, was advised through a Notice of 

Proposed Civil Penalty, followed by a Final Notice of Proposed Civil 

Penalty that the FAA proposed to assess a civil penalty in the amount of 

$11,000. On March 10, 2014, Respondent submitted a written demand 

for a hearing. 

(2) On March 19, 2014, the Agency served its Complaint. Exhibit A. 

(3) The Complaint was received by Respondent on March 24, 2014. Exhibit 

B. 

(4) Under Rule 209(a) of the Rules of Practice (14 C.F.R. §13.209(a)), "A 

respondent shall file a written answer to the complaint, or may file a 

written motion pursuant to §l3.208(d) or §13.218(f)(l-4) of this subpart 
JUL. 22.2014 I 0:53AM FA A REGIONAL COUNSEL, AEA-7 NO. 8784 P 3/22 

instead of filing an answer, not later than 30 days after service of the 

complaint." 

(5) Under Rule 211(e ) of the Rules of Practice (14 C.F.R. §13.2U(e)), 

"Whenever a party has ... a duty to act or make any response within a 

prescribed time period after service by mail, or on a date certain after 

service by mail, 5 days shall be added to the prescribed period." 

(6) Under Rule 209(f) of the Rules of Practice (14 C.F.R. §13.209(1)), "A 

person's failure to file an answer without good cause shall be deemed an 

admission ofthe truth of each allegation contained in the complaint." 

(7) Thus, the deadline for Respondent to file an answer (or motion under 

§13.208(d) or §13.218(1)(1-4)) was 35 days after March 19,2014, or April 

24,2014. 

(8) To date, Respondent has failed to file an answer (or motion under 

§13.208(d) or §13.218(1)(1-4)). 

(9) Respondent has not demonstrated good cause for its failure to flle an 

answer. 

(10) As a result of Respondent's failure to file an answer, the truth of 

each allegation in the Complaint must be deemed admitted. 

(11) In the Complaint, the following was alleged: 

I. Mountain Air Cargo, Inc. (MTNA) is the holder of air carrier 

certificate number MTNA123B. 

2 
JUL. 22.2014 !0:53AM F A A REGIONAL COUNSEL, AEA-7 NO. 8784 P 4/22 

2. At all times relevant herein, MTNA operated aircraft in operations 

under part 121 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (FARs). 

3. At all times relevant herein, MTNA was required by its operations 

specifications (hereinafter "the operations specifications'? to 

maintain the aircraft that it operated under its Continuing Analysis 

and Surveillance System (CASS). 

4. At all times relevant herein, the CASS required compliance with 

FAR 121.373(a), which states that each certificate holder shall 

establish and maintain a system for the continuing analysis ttlld 

surveillance of the performance and effectiveness of its inspection 

program and the program covering other maintenance, preventive 

maintenance, and alterations and for the correction of any 

deficiency in those programs, regardless of whether those 

programs are carried out by the certificate holder or by another 

person. 

5. At all times relevant therein, under the operations specifications, 

MTNA was required to comply with FAR 121.369(a) and to 

maintain a list (by name and location) of other persons 

(maintenance providers) with whom it arranged to accomplish 

maintenance, preventive maintenance, or alterations for the 

certificate holder (hereinafter referred to as "approved vendor 

list''). 

6. At all times relevant herein, MTNA was authorized under the 

operations specification to include both essential maintenance 

providers and non-essential maintenance providers. 

7. At all times relevant herein, essential maintenance was defined in 

the operations specifications as any Required Inspection Item onwing accomplished after any maintenance or alteration, whereas 

nonessential maintenance was defined as other maintenance. 

8. At all times relevant herein, under the operations specifications, 

MTNA was required to demonstrate, through an on-site audit or by 

some other means in accordance with FAR 121.373(a), that each 

nonessential maintenance provider in the approved vendor list has 

an adequate organization, adequate facilities and equipment, 

competent personnel and is capable of performing the work that is 

consistent with the requirements of FAR 121.367. 

3 
JUL. 22 2014 10 53AM F A A REGIONAL COUNSEL, AEA-7 NO. 8784 P 5/22 

9. At all times relevant herein, one of the nonessential maintenance 

providers included in the approved vendor list of MTNA was 

NORDHAM GROUP INC., certified repair station number EZ2R 

812K, located at 11200 E. Pine Street Tulsa, OK 74116 (hereinafter 

referred to as "EZ2R"). 

I 0. At all times relevant herein, MTNA failed to ensure that EZ2R had 

an adequate organization, adequate facilities and equipment, or 

competent personnel, and was not capable of performing the 

maintenance contracted out by MTNA in accordance with the 

requirements of FAR 12.367. 

11. At all times relevant herein, in fact, EZ2R did not have an 

adequate organization, adequate facilities and equipment, or 

competent personnel, and was not capable of performing the 

maintenance contracted out by MTNA in accordance with the 

requirements of FAR 12.367. 

12. At all times relevant herein, instead of performing the maintenance 

contracted out by MTNA, EZ2R would arrange with another 

maintenance provider to perform the maintenance, specifically the 

NORDHAM GROUP INC. Transparency Division, certified repair 

station number EZ22 812K, located at 7018 North Lakewood, 

Tulsa, OK 74117 (hereinafter referred to as "EZ22"). 

13. At all times relevant herein, EZ22 was not on the approved vendor 

list of MTNA. 

14. The maintenance contracted out by MTNA to EZ22 included, but 

was not limited to, maintenance on the following parts: 

(a) Left hand wing tip lens, shipped by MTNA to EZ2R on or about 

August 15, 2011; 

(b) Right han.d landing light cover, shipped by MTNA to EZ2R on 

or about August 25, 2011; 

(c) Landing light cover, shipped by MTNA to EZ2R on or about 

October 14, 2011; 

(d) Right hand landing light lens, shipped by MTNA to EZ2R 011 or 

about February 3, 2012; 

4 
JUL, 22,2014 !0:53AM F A A REGIONAL COUNSEL, AEA-7 NO, 8784 P 6/22 

(e) End cap, shipped by MTNA to EZ2R on or about May 2, 2012; 

(/) Right hand wing tip lens, shipped by MTNA to EZ2R on or 

about August I, 2012; and 

(g) Left hand wing tip lens, shipped by MTNA to EZ2R on or about 

August 18, 2012; 

(h) End cap, shipped by MTNA to EZ2R on or about September 26, 

2012,· 

(i) Left hand wing tip lens, shipped by MTNA to EZ2R, or about 

May 8, 2013; 

0) Right hand wing tip lens, shipped by MTNA to EZ2R, or about 

May 13, 2013. 

15. MTNA thus failed to comply with the operations specifications. 

16. MTNA thus failed to ensure that maintenance, preventive 

maintenance, and alterations performed by it, or by other persons, 

were performed in accordance with the certificate holder's 

manual. 

17. MTNA thus failed to establish and maintain a system for the 

continuing analysis and surveillance of the performance and 

effectiveness of its inspection program and the program covering 

other maintenance, preventive maintenance, and alterations and 

for the correction of any deficiency in those programs, regardless 

of whether those programs are carried out by the certificate holder 

or by another person. 

12.By reason of the foregoing facts and circumstances, it was alleged that 

Respondeut violated the following sections of the Federal Aviation 

Regulations: 

a. Section 119.5(1), which states that no person may operate an aircraft 

under this part, part 121 of this chapter, or part 135 of this chapter in 

violation of an air carrier operating certificate, operating certificate, or 

appropriate operations specifications issued under this part. 

5 
JUL. 22.2014 I 0:53AM F A A REGIONAL COUNSEL, AEA-7 NO. 8784 P 7/22 

b. Section 121.367(a), which states that each certificate holder shall have 

an inspection program and a program coverit1g other maintenance, 

preventive maintenance, and alterations that e1zsures that maintenance, 

preventive maintenance, and alterations performed by it, or by other 

persons, are performed in accordance with the certificate holder's 

manual. 

c. Section 121.367(b), which states that each certificate holder shall have 

an inspection program and a program covering other maintenance, 

preventive maintenance, and alterations that ensures that competent 

personnel and adequate facilities and equipment are provided for the 

proper performance of maintenance, preventive maintenance, and 

alterations. 

d. Section 121.373(a), which states that each certificate holder shall 

establish and maintain a system for the continuing analysis and 

surveillance of the performance and effectiveness of its inspection 

program and the program covering other maintenance, preventive 

maintenance, and alterations and for the correction of any deficiency in 

those programs, regardless of whether those programs are carried out 

by the certificate holder or by another person. 

13. As a result of Respondent's failure to file an answer, it has effectively 

defaulted on its right to a hearing. In the Matter of Safety Equipment and 

Sign Co., LTD, FAA Order No. 92-76 (1992). 

14. Therefore, it should be found that Respondent violated the Federal 

Aviation Regulations as alleged in the Complaint and Respondent should be 

assessed a cil penalty in the amount of$11,000.00, as proposed by the Agency. 

6 
JUL. 22.2014 10:53AM F A A REGIONAL COUNSEL, AEA-7 NO. 8784 P 8/22 

WliEREFORE, the FAA, by counsel, respectfully requests that the 

Administrative Law Judge enter an order that Respondent be assessed a civil 

penalty in the amount of $11,000, In the alternative, it is requested that the 

hearing be limited to the issue of sanctions. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Alfred R. Johnson, Jr. 

Regional Counsel 

ny, 

Attorney 

Zachary:~n ~ 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

718 553-3258 

718 995-5699 

7 
JUL. 22.2014 10:53AM F A A REGIONAL COUNSEL, AEA-7 NO. 8784 P 9/22 

CERTIFlCATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that the foregoing Motion for Decision has been sent via ftrst 

class mail and facsimile addressed as follows: 

Mark A. Dombroff 

Respondent's Counsel 

McKenna Long & Alderidge 

1676 International Drive PH 

Mclean, VA 22102 

FAX: 703-336-8750 

Hon. J.E. Sullivan, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

Federal Aviation Administration (Original and one copy) 

600 Independence Avenue, SW 

Wilbur Wright Building- Room 2014 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Date: __ J_U~_·$._S:_10_14_ 

aralegal Specialist 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office of Regional Counsel 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

8 
J JUL. 22.2014 10:54AM F A A REGIONAL COUNSEL, AEA-7 NO. 8784 P 10/22 

I 

' I 

EXHIBIT A 
.JUL. 22. 2014 10: 54AM 

U.S. Department 

of Transportation 

Federal Aviation 

Administration 

MA.1 19 Z014 

F A A REGIONAL COUNSEL, AEA-7 

Eastern Region 

Regional Counsel 

Telephone; 718 553-3258 

Facsimile: 718 995-5699 

CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building- Room 2014 

ATTN: HEARING DOCKET CLERK 

NO. 8784 P 11/22 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

Re: In the Matter of Mountain Air Cargo, Inc., 2013EA680043 

Enclosed herein please find a copy of a request for hearing and the original and one 

copy of the FAA's Complaint in the above-entitled action for filing, together with 

proof of service upon the Respondent. 

The FAA requests that the hearing in this matter be held in the Charlotte, NC, area 

and expects that the hearing will last two (2) days. 

Please address all communications for the Federal Aviation Administration to the 

attention of Zachary M. Berman, Office of the Regional Counsel, 1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434. 

Sincerely, 

Alfred R. Johnson, Jr. 

Regional Counsel 

By: Zachary 

Attorney 

M.BilUalJ. ~ 

Enclosures 
,JUL 22.2014 !0:54AM F A A REGIONAL COUNSEL, AEA-7 

Regional Counsel for the Eastern Region 

Federal Aviation Ad~ninislr~~ticn 

l Aviaticn Pl:aztt 

lllllloic., NY I 1434 

Dote .3-/0 - I t..j 

Mounl<lin Air ca[Jlo, lnc,2013EA680043 

Subject~ P'!n~l 'Nolicy o[PcopMed Civil Penolty 

Rc:monse Attqehme11l 

NO. 8784 P. 12/22 

[n reply to YO\lf Final Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty Mo-tmtain Air Cargo, Inc. elC(:ts to proceed es indh~Qtc:d by Hs check mark 

beside ti1e numbered p11ragraph below: 

I. U Mounlilll'l Air Cargo, Ine.. hereby submits the atnourn of tlte proposed ci\'il penalty with the unde:(~tcmding lhat an Order 

Assess:in13 Civil Pennliywi/1 be issued in that W1J.OUIJt. 

2.. ~Mountain Air Cargo. Inc. hereby requests a formal heeril1g: in accordru1ee wilh Section I3.l6 of lhe Federal Aviation 

Regulations. 

By SO!!t.liPg !his fa~ to th.~ f~cleri\1,\vlt~tlau Admit~ist!1l.Uon, En:!terll Region, MOLillt3'fll Air 

C.1rgo, Inc. also btreby eerunes I hat ,. ~:opy uf 1his fonn hi'IS been filed wiCh tile Hc:r~rltlg 

Docket Clerk (Hearing Doc.ket, Federal AYiation Ad.mirrlstrat1on, BOO lrtdc-peqde:nce Avenue:, 

S.W,. Room 924A, Washillgton. DC 20591, AfttnUom Hearing Dock~t Clerk}. 

7 
, JUL. 22 2 0 14 I 0 : 5 4AM F A A REGIONAL COUNSEL, AEA-7 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

In the Matter of Mountain Air Cargo, Inc. 

2013EA680043 

Judge Not Assigned 

COMPLAINT 

NO. 8784 P. 13/22 

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), by counsel, hereby files its Complaint, 

pursuant to Rule 208 of the Rules of Practice (14 C.F .R. 13 .208), and states as 

follows: 

I 

Respondent, Mountain Air Cargo, Inc., was advised through a Final Notice of 

Proposed Civil Penalty that the FAA proposed to assess a civil penalty in the ammmt 

of $11,000.00. On March 13, 2014, Respondent mailed a written demand for a 

hearing. 

II 

l. Mountain Air Cargo, Inc. (MTNA) is the holder of air carrier 

certificate number MTNA123B. 

2. At all times relevant herein, MTNA operated aircraft in operations 

under part 121 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (FARs). 

3. At all times relevant herein, MTNA was required by its operations 

specifications (hereinafter "the operations specifications") to 
JUL. 22 2014 !0:54AM F A A REGIONAL COUNSEL, AEA-7 NO. 8784 P. 14/22 

maintain the aircraft that it operated under its Continuing Analysis 

and Surveillance System (CASS). 

4. At all times relevant herein, the CASS required compliance with 

FAR 121.373(a), which states that each certificate holder shall 

establish and maintain a system for the continuing analysis and 

surveillance of the performance and effectiveness of its inspection 

program and the program covering other maintenance, preventive 

maintenance, and alterations and for the correction of any deficiency 

in those programs, regardless of whether those programs are carried 

out by the certificate holder or by another person. 

5. At all times relevant therein, under the operations specifications, 

MTNA was required to comply with FAR 121.369(a) and to 

maintain a list (by name and location) of other persons (maintenance 

providers) with whom it arranged to accomplish maintenance, 

preventive maintenance, or alterations for the certificate holder 

(hereinafter referred to as "approved vendor list"). 

6. At all times relevant herein, MTI~A was authorized under the 

operations specification to include both essential maintenance 

providers and non-essential maintenance providers. 

7. At all times relevant herein, essential maintenance was defined in the 

operations specifications as any Required Inspection Item on-wing 

accomplished after any maintenance or alteration, whereas 

nonessential maintenance was defined as other maintenance. 

8, At all times relevant herein, under the operations specifications, 

MTNA was required to demonstrate, through an on-site audit or by 

some other means in accordance with FAR 121.373(a), that each 

nonessential maintenance provider in the approved vendor list has an 

adequate organization, adequate facilities and equipment, competent 

personnel and is capable of pertbnning the work that is consistent 

with the requirements of FAR 121.367. 

9. At all times relevant herein, one of the nonessential maintenance 

providers included in the approved vendor list of MTNA was 

NORDHAM GROUP INC., certified repair station number EZ2R 

812K, located at 11200 E. Pine Street Tulsa, OK 74116 (hereinafter 

referred to as "EZ2R"). 
• JUL. 22 2 0 14 1 0 : 5 4AM f A A REGIONAL COUNSEL, AEA-7 NO. 8784 P 15/22 

10. At all times relevant herein, MTNA failed to ensure that EZ2R had 

an adequate organizatio11, adequate facilities and equipment, or 

competent personnel, and was not capable of performing the 

maintenance contracted out by MTNA in accordance with the 

requirements ofFAR 12.367. 

11. At all times relevant herein, in fact, EZ2R did not have an adequate 

organization, adequate facilities and equipment, or competent 

personnel, and was not capable of performing the maintenance 

contracted out by MTNA in accordance with the requirements of 

FAR 12.367. 

12. At all times relevant herein, instead of perfonning the maintenance 

contracted out by MTNA, EZ2R would arrange with another 

maintenance provider to perform the maintenance, specifically the 

NORDHAM GROUP INC. Transparency Division, certified repair 

station number EZ22 812K, located at 7018 North Lakewood, Tulsa, 

OK 7 4117 (hereinafter referred to as "EZ22"). 

13. At all times relevant herein, EZ22 was not on the approved vendor 

list ofMTNA. 

14. The maintenance contracted out by MTNA to EZ22 included, but 

was not linlited to, maintenance on the following parts: 

(a) Left hand wing tip lens, shipped by MTNA to EZ2R on or about 

August 15, 2011; 

(b) Right hand landing light cover, shipped by MTNA to EZ2R on or 

about August 25, 2011; 

(c) Landing light cover, shipped by MTNA to EZ2R on or about 

October 14, 2011; 

(d) Right hand landing light lens, shipped by MTNA to EZ2R on or 

about February 3, 2012; 

(e) End cap, shipped by MTNA to EZ2Ron or about May 2, 2012; 

(f) Right hand wing tip lens, shipped by MTNA to EZ2R on or about 

August 1, 2012; and 

(g) Left hand wing tip lens, shipped by MTNA to EZ2R on or about 

August 18, 2012; 
JUL. 22.2014 !0:54AM F A A REGIONAL COUNSEL, AEA-7 NO. 8784 P 16/22 

(h) End cap, shipped by MTNA to EZ2R on or about September 26, 

2012; 

(i) Left hand wing tip lens, shipped by MTNA to EZ2R, or about 

May 8, 2013; 

G) Right hand wing tip lens, shipped by MTNA to EZ2R, or about 

May 13, 2013. 

15. MTNA thus failed to comply with the operations specifications. 

16. MTNA thus failed to ensure that maintenance, preventive 

maintenance, and alterations performed by it, or by other persons, 

were performed in accordance with the certificate holder's manual. 

17. MTNA thus failed to establish and maintain a system for the 

continuing analysis and surveillance of the performance and 

effectiveness of its inspection program and the program covering 

other maintenance, preventive maintenance, and alterations and for 

the correction of any deficiency in those programs, regardless of 

whether those programs are carried out by the certificate holder or by 

another person. 

III 

By reason of the foregoing facts and circmnstances, Respondent violated the 

following section of the Federal Aviation Regulations: 

a. Section 119.5(1), which states that no person may operate an aircraft under 

this part, part 121 of this chapter, or part 135 of this chapter in violation of 

an air carrier operating certificate, operating certificate, or appropriate 

operations specifications issued under this part. 

b. Section l21.367(a), which states that each certificate holder shall have an 

inspection program and a program covering other maintenance, 

preventive maintenance, and alterations that ensures that maintenance, 

preventive maintenance, and alterations performed by it, or by other 

persons, are performed in accordance with the certitlcate holder's manuaL 
· JUL. 22.2014 10: 54AM F A A REGIONAL COUNSEL. AEA-7 NO. 8784 P 17/22 

c. Section 121.367(b), which states that each certificate holder shall have an 

inspection program and a program covering other maintenance, 

preventive maintenance, and alterations that ensnres that competent 

personnel and adequate facilities and equipment are provided for the 

proper performance of maintenance, preventive maintenance, and 

alterations. 

d, Section 121.373(a), which states that each certificate holder shall establish 

and maintain a system for the continuing analysis and surveillance of the 

performance and effectiveness of its inspection program and the program 

covering other maintenance, preventive maintenance, and alterations and 

for the correction of any deficiency in those programs, regardless of 

whether those programs are carried out by the certificate holder or by 

another person. 

IV 

l. Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. §46301(a)(5), Respondent is subject to a civil penalty not 

to exceed $11,000 for each of the violations alleged. 

2, Under the facts and circumstances ofthis case, a civil penalty of$11,0000.00 is 

appropriate. 

WHEREFORE, the FAA, by counsel, respectfully requests that the 

Administrative Law Judge enter an order that Responden~ be assessed a civil penalty 
,JUL 22.2014 10:54AM F A A REGIONAL COUNSEL, AEA-7 

in fue amount of$1 1,000, 

Respectfully submitted, 

Altred R. Jolmson, Jr. 

Regional Counsel 

By zachary ~ ~mliU1 

Attorney 

Federal Aviation Administration 

l Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

718 553-3258 

718 995-5699 

NOTE: 

NO. 8784 P 18/22 

The Rules of Practice for this proceeding are set forth in Part 13, 

Subpart G, of the Fede.-al Aviation Regulations (14 C.F.R Part 13). 

The Rules of Practice provide that Respondent must file a written 

answer to this Complaint, or a written Motion to Dismiss if appropriate, not 

later than 30 days after the date shown on the Certificate of Service. A general 

denial is deemed a failure to flle an answer (Section l3.209(e)). 
.JUL. 22 2014 10 54AM F A A REGIONAL COUNSEL, AEA-7 NO. 8784 P 19/22 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that the foregoing Complaint has been placed this date in the United 

States mail, postage prepaid, by Certified Mail - Return Receipt Requested addressed 

as follows: 

Mark A. Dombroff, Esq. 

McKenna Long & Aldridge 

1676 International Drive 

Penthouse 

McLean, VA22102 

Federal Aviation Administration (Original and one copy) 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building -Room 2014 

~IF FILING BY FEDERAL EXPRESS 

Federal Aviation Administration (Original and one copy) 

600 Independence Avenue, SW 

Wilbur Wright Building- Room 2014 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Date:. ______ _ />/. ,fn{._ ~is!!-< ooks 

· Paralegal Specialist 

P ederal Aviation Administration 

Office of Regional Counsel 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

JUL. 22. 2014 10: 55AM F A A REGIONAL COUNSEL, AEA-7 NO. 8784 P. 21122 

EXHIBIT B 
m Comple le items 1, 2, and 3, Also complete 

ilem 4 if Restricted De!lvmy Is desir-ed. 

&:~ PriJJi your n~me and address oil !.he reverse 

.so that we can return the card to you. 

ffi Attach this card to the bs:ck of the malfplece, 

or on the fran l if space permits. 

Article Add~-sed •u 

}, , I .-, ;\ , ' /·' 

lJ! :tt 1 it -J}?:t !>'v•~,- ;:::-LV< -~ - . ..-'" . jl ;.> 

~ ·1/ -l ,' -·;-.' 

!':~ KfJ,:" o'nX r if("t"'4-r- :·j'J ~ -fJ.i-{fl/.-f-·;, (l r <7 J>tL-< · 

I -'/!. Jf----{.- ___.. (., r-.,..1 "- ~v _,~ . • </--("'" 

1~1 ?Jf.dr-

[1[1[12 3!127 

D. Is delivBry address !Efferent irnm ilem 1? 

lrY~S, enlar dc-IIVeJY address betow: 
JUL. 22 2014 10: 53AM F A A REGIONAL COUNSEL, AEA-7 

Phone: 

Fax: Ao~ 3/,f:, 7Si3C. 4(:).:? "1f3 Si..Y.Q., 1o 3 33? !15V I"' 

From:~ Cn.-," j] P,rm"-&' 

Title: 'tJtttA~ 

Date 1/ ,.j.,!). j .ft#/y 

Pages: 

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE 

NO. 8784 P 1122 

Federal Aviation 

Administration 

Office of Regional Counsel 

1 Avi<Jtion Plaza, Rm. 561 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

T718-553-

F718-995-5699 

Email: 

This facsimile and the document(s) accompanying this facsimile transmission contain confidential 

information that is legally privileged, The information is intended only for the use of the recipient 

named above. If you have received this facsimile in error, please immediately notify this office by 

telephone You are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or taking any action in 

reliance on the content of this facsimile is strictly prohibited.