alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

LOUISIANA-PACIFIC CORPORATION

411 Union Street, Suite 2000

Nashville, TN 37219-1700

(615) 986-5600

May 6, 2009

Securities and Exchange
Commission

Judiciary Plaza

450 Fifth Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20549



| | Re: | Certification Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of the Form 10-Q of Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, that, to such officers knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods expressed in the Report.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ RICHARD W. FROSTName:

Richard W. FrostTitle:

Chief Executive Officer/s/ CURTIS M. STEVENSName:

Curtis M. StevensTitle:

Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Louisiana-Pacific Corporation and will be retained by Louisiana-Pacific Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2019097EN.01000101.xml

| 14.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 97/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 97/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9267 — KKR/Telepizza)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 97/01)

On 8 March 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9267. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9267. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**SECTION 906CERTIFICATION**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Summa Industries (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for thefiscal quarter ended November 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James R. Swartwout,Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, herebycertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 
|   |    /s/  James R. Swartwout |   |
|--------|-------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | James R.  Swartwout                       |
|   | Chief  Executive Officer                  |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer                  |
|   | Summa  Industries                         |
|   | January 7,  2004                          |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Summa Industriesand will be retained by Summa Industries and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Exhibit 4.6



                            Michael T. Williams, Esq.
                              2503 W. Gardner Ct.
                                 Tampa FL 33611
                              Phone: 813.831.9348
                                Fax: 813.832.5284
                         e-mail: wmslaw@tampabay.rr.com


                                  June 20, 2003


Sky Way Communications Holding Corp.

Via e-mail and fax

Re:  Engagement Agreement

Dear Sirs:

     This letter sets forth the terms by which I shall be engaged in connection
with matters described below. I agree that the terms and conditions of the
engagement shall be as set forth in this letter.

1.   Engagement. I have been engaged as special counsel for the Sky Way
Communications Holding Corp. ["Company"].

The engagement shall be limited to the assistance with following matters:

        o   The preparation of a Forms 10K-SB, 10Q-SB, and 8-K [Item 5 only]
        o   The preparation of Forms 3, 4, 5, and 13D/G
        o   Availability to respond to general securities law questions

No other services, including but not limited to services in connection with the
offer or sale of securities in a capital-raising transaction, and services that
directly or indirectly promote or maintain a market for your securities, shall
be the subject of or provided under this Agreement.

The term of the engagement shall be through the period ending December 31, 2003.

2.   Fees, Costs and Expenses. My fee shall be 2,000,000 shares of your common
stock, to be registered on form S-8.

3.   Sale Restrictions. My sale of the stock shall be restricted as set forth in
Schedule A attached hereto.

                               Sincerely,

                              /s/  Michael T. Williams
                                   Michael  T.  Williams,  Esq.



                                    EXHIBIT A

                                    BLEED-OUT

Williams agrees that during the period from the date hereof until December 1,
2003 (the "Lock-Up Period"), Williams shall not (except as permitted below),
without the prior written consent of the Company, directly or indirectly, offer,
issue, sell, contract to sell (including, without limitation, any short sale),
grant any option for the sale of, pledge, or otherwise dispose of or transfer
("Transfer") more than 36,000 shares of common stock in any one-day period;
provided, however, the foregoing restrictions shall not apply to
(i) dispositions by gift, will or by the laws of descent and distribution, or
otherwise to Williams's parents, siblings, spouse, children, or grandchildren,
(ii) a trust for the benefit of Williams's parents, siblings, spouse, children,
or grandchildren, (iii) a partnership, the general partner of which is Williams
or Williams's parents, siblings, spouse, children, or grandchildren, or a
corporation or limited liability company, a majority of whose outstanding equity
securities is owned of record or beneficially by Williams or by any of the
foregoing; provided that, in each case, such transferee agrees in writing to be
bound by the terms hereof.
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 424 

Congratulating the BMW ORACLE Racing team for winning the thirtythird America’s Cup. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 25, 2010 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN (for herself and Mrs. BOXER) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating the BMW ORACLE Racing team for winning 

the thirty-third America’s Cup. 

Whereas the America’s Cup is the oldest active trophy in 

international sports; 

Whereas the United States was represented in the thirtythird America’s Cup by BMW ORACLE Racing; 

Whereas the team was led by the owner, founder, and chief 

executive officer of Oracle Corporation, Larry Ellison, the 

chief executive officer of the team, Russell Coutts, and 

the skipper of the team, James Spithill; 

Whereas BMW ORACLE Racing represents the Golden Gate 

Yacht Club located in San Francisco, California; 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 424 IS 

Whereas the boat of the BMW ORACLE Racing team, USA, 

is the largest and most technologically advanced boat to 

ever race for the America’s Cup; 

Whereas USA was sourced and built entirely in the United 

States; 

Whereas, on February 12, 2010, the BMW ORACLE Racing 

team won the first of the America’s Cup races with a 15 

minutes, 28 seconds lead over the Swiss Defender, 

Alinghi; 

Whereas, on February 14, 2010, the BMW ORACLE Racing 

team captured the thirty-third America’s Cup with a 5 

minute, 26 second victory over the Swiss Defender, 

Alinghi, clinching the best of the series with a second victory; and 

Whereas BMW ORACLE Racing has represented the United 

States with high standards, technological prowess, and 

great skill: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) congratulates the entire BMW ORACLE 

3 Racing team for winning the thirty-third America’s 

4 Cup; and 

5 (2) recognizes the BMW ORACLE Racing 

6 team, and specifically the founder and owner Larry 

7 Ellison, for the technological accomplishments of the 

8 team in the international sport of sailing. 

Æ 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Micronetics, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended September 27, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), David Robbins, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                  |  |        |  |                                                      
|----------------- |  | ------ |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|November 12, 2008 |  |        |  | /s/ DAVID ROBBINS                                    
|                  |  | Name:  |  | David Robbins                                        
|                  |  | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### State v. Rucker

106,504

11/22/13

Denied.

Unpublished
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 14

- 00034

- CR

BRIAN WILLIAMS, Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 5th District Court Bowie County, Texas Trial Court No. 11F0303

- 5

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley2 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Brian Williams has filed notices of appeal in connection with rulings in multiple prosecutions in which he is the defendant. In each instance, he is complaining about the denial
of relief on pretrial motions filed in his pending prosecution. As a general rule, an appellate court may consider appeals by criminal defendants only
after conviction. See Ex parte Shumake , 953 S.W.2d 842, 844 (Tex. App.

— Austin 1997, no pet.). It is axiomatic that a party may appeal only that which the Legislature h as authorized.
Olowosuko v. State , 826 S.W.2d 940, 941 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992). Intermediate appellate courts have no jurisdiction to review interlocutory orders absent express authority. T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 25.2(b)(2) ; Ex parte Apolinar v. State , 820 S.W.2d 792, 794 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Sanchez v.
State , 340 S.W.3d 848, 849 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2011, no pet.)

. Upon receiving his notice of appeal, we sent Williams a letter telling him that we found no order or judgment in the record that was appealable and asked him to show this Court how we had jurisdiction over each appeal. We have received a response in which Williams directs us to Rule 25.2(a)(2)(A) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure as permitting his appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P 25.2 (a)(2)( A). That
section of the R ule provides that if a plea agreement is granted , a defendant may appeal certain types of matters raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial. In that limited situation, such an appeal for certain types of pretrial determinations may be brought from a conviction pursuant to a plea agreement . The R ule provides an exception to the limitation on appeals from convictions pursuant to a plea agreement, and it does not allow separate, interlocutory appeals from any pretri al rulings by the trial court.3 The R ule provides no relief for Williams. Our review of the appellate record reveals no appealable orders. We , therefore , must dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
We dismiss t he appeal.

Bailey C. Moseley Justice
Date Submitted: April 3 , 2014 Date Decided: April 4 , 2014
Do Not Publish
REINALDO CORTES

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 1 5

- 2 08 2

________ _____________________/

Opinion filed June 21, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Dixie County

. Mark E. Feagle

, Judge

.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Barbara J. Busharis , Assistant Public

Defender, Tallahassee

, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo B ondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Ap pellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, WETHERELL, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
No. 12-6.

#### Trudeau *v.*Federal Trade Commission.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. 

JORRI LYNN CATES,

Petitioner,

v.

MONTANA FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, MISSOULA

COUNTY, THE HONORABLE LESLIE HALLIGAN, PRESIDING,

Respondent.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Petitioner’s motion to file over-length brief, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner’s motion is granted and

Petitioner may file a Petition in excess of 4,000 words in this matter.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 29 2021

03/29/2021

Case Number: OP 21-0145
**Exhibit 99.1**

 
| ****                     |
|--------------------------|
|  Sallie  Mae, Inc.  |
|  12061 Bluemont Way |
|  Reston,VA 20190    |

 

 

**Annual Officer Certificate**

** **

**SLM Student Loan Trust 2005-10**

 

Pursuant to Section 3.1 of the Administration Agreement (the“Agreement”) and Section 3.9 of the Trust Indenture (“the Indenture”), we, theundersigned, hereby certify that (I) a review has been made of the activitiesand performance of the Servicer and Administrator from January 1, 2005 throughDecember 31, 2005, and (II) to the best of our knowledge, the Servicer and Administratorhave fulfilled their obligations under the Agreement throughout such period.Additionally, pursuant to Section 11.1(b) (v) of the Indenture, alldispositions of collateral that occurred during the above period were in theordinary course of the issuer’s business and the proceeds thereof were appliedin accordance with the basic documents.

 

 

March 27, 2006

 

 
| /S/ TED A. MORRIS  |   | /S/ J. LANCE FRANKE |   |
|--------------------|--------|---------------------|--------|
| Authorized Officer |   | Authorized Officer  |

 

----
|                                                                                                
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                  
|View History:                                                                                   
|                                                                                                
|Percent of Commercial Natural Gas Deliveries in North Dakota Represented by the Price  (Percent)
|                                                                                                
|                                                                                                
|Percent of Commercial Natural Gas Deliveries in North Dakota Represented by the Price  (Percent)
|                                                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 74.8   | 70.0   | 68.9   | 72.7   | 79.6   | 80.9   | 88.0   | 88.9   | 83.8   | 88.2  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 89.5   | 90.1   | 91.6   | 94.4   | 92.6   | 92.9   | 93.0   | 93.3   | 93.4   | 92.9  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 92.6   | 92.8   | 91.9   | 92.6   | 93.1   | 93.1   | 92.8   | 92.7   | 93.0   | 93.5  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 93.9   | 94.0   | 94.5   | 94.0   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM PART I OF THIS FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   87,762
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,100
<INVENTORY>                                     85,422
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               185,360
<PP&E>                                       1,694,440
<DEPRECIATION>                                 729,766
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,194,839
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          143,173
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        77,547
<OTHER-SE>                                     384,486
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,194,839
<SALES>                                        182,211
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               182,211
<CGS>                                          159,694
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  159,694
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,442
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     44
<INCOME-TAX>                                        16
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 28
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        28
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# Data for Table B25

# RSEs for Table B25
Exhibit 32.1
 Certification
Pursuant to Rule 13a-14 (b) and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (a) and (b))
  1.
    
    the annual report on Form 10-K of American Railcar Industries, Inc. (the Company)
for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the Annual Report) fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m or 78o(d)); and
 2.
    
    the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:
March 12, 2010/s/ James CowanJames Cowan, President and Chief Executive Officer
  3.
    
    the annual report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2009
(the Annual Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
 4.
    
    the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:
March 12, 2010/s/ Dale C. DaviesDale C. Davies, Senior Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer