alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

____________________

No. 99-1193

SANTA PADILLA-GARCIA,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

JOSE GUILLERMO RODRIGUEZ, In his Personal

Capacity and in his Official Capacity as

Mayor of the Municipality of Mayaguez;

MUNICIPALITY OF MAYAGUEZ; REINALDO TORRES;

EDGARDO LUGO, In his Personal Capacity and

in his Official Capacity; Z, Y, W PERSONS,

Who also conspired to discriminate against

plaintiff depriving her of protected rights

for wrongful termination of employment contract,

Defendants, Appellees.

____________________

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this court issued on May 15, 2000 is amended as

follows:

Page 20, line 3 should read: "note 2" instead of "note 1."
Exhibit 32.1  Statement of Chief Executive Officer  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of San Diego Gas & Electric (the "Company") certifies that:  (i) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the "Annual Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (ii) the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    February 22, 2007  /S/  Debra L. ReedDebra L. ReedChief Executive Officer
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 09768**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name 3**  **Description** x 09768\09768_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09768\09768_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09768\09768_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09768\09768_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09768\09768_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

09768\Certification Statement Plant ID_09768.pdf Plant certification statement x 09768\Supporting Documentation\09768_Eddystone Part A - MAP-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09768\Supporting Documentation\09768_Eddystone Part A - WB-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09768\Supporting Documentation\09768_Eddystone Part D - WWT-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09768\Supporting Documentation\09768_Follow Up.pdf Follow-up correspondence regarding survey contents. x 09768\09768_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

09768\09768_Completeness Check.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket. 3No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
#### State v. Coronado

110,193

07/21/2015

Denied.

Unpublished
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          11,713
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 7,745
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     71,477
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        354,903
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,436
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 458,688
<DEPOSITS>                                     392,581
<SHORT-TERM>                                     4,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              5,428
<LONG-TERM>                                     20,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,266
<OTHER-SE>                                      32,413
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 458,688
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 21,813
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                3,380
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   342
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                25,535
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              11,924
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,551
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           12,984
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      630
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  9,557
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,101
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,061
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.80
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.59
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,676
<LOANS-PAST>                                       329
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,234
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      513
<RECOVERIES>                                        85
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,436
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,436
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 70 (Friday, April 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 17827]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-9329]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. Once the application has been accepted 
for processing, it will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 
1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the acquisition of a nonbanking 
company, the review also includes whether the acquisition of the 
nonbanking company complies with the standards in section 4 of the BHC 
Act. Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted 
throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than May 5, 1997.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Lois Berthaume, Vice President) 
104 Marietta Street, NW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-2713:
    1. Pinnacle Bancshares, Inc., Thomson, Georgia; to become a bank 
holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of 
McDuffie Bank & Trust, Thomson, Georgia.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Randall C. Sumner, Vice 
President) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63102-2034:
    1. First National Security Company, DeQueen, Arkansas; to acquire 
an additional 2.5 percent, for a total of 34.7 percent of the voting 
shares of First National Bancshares of Hempstead, County, Inc., Hope, 
Arkansas, and thereby indirectly acquire First National Bank of Hope, 
Hope, Arkansas; Bank of Blevins, Blevins, Arkansas; and First National 
Bank of Lewisville, Lewisville, Arkansas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 7, 1997.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-9329 Filed 4-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
```
#### *In re*Care & Treatment of Harris

109,568

02/12/14

Denied

Unpublished
1.
    
    I have reviewed this amendment to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Orange REIT, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in
the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses
in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information;
andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 Date: June 4, 2008
    
    /s/ Brad Honigfeld

Chairman (Principal Executive Officer)
#### State v. Williams

107,241

12/27/13

Denied.

Unpublished
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT (99a)

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
       (SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
                              UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Russell Corporation, an Alabama corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that: (1) The
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 4, 2003 (the "Form 10-K")
of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) The information contained in the
Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Dated: March 26, 2003


/s/  John F. Ward
-------------------------------------------------
John F. Ward
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Dated: March 26, 2003


/s/  Robert D. Martin
-------------------------------------------------
Robert D. Martin
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter
63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of a separate
disclosure document.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Sitka Sciences, Inc. (the "Company") on
      Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J. Jay Lobell,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/J.
                Jay Lobell
              J.
                Jay Lobell
              Principal
                Executive Officer
              February
                20, 2007
#### State v. Everett

103,067

04/08/13

Denied.

Unpublished
#### Giddens v. Via Christi Regional Med. Center

110,856

08/20/2015

Denied.

Unpubhshed
#### State v. Ingram

109,158

07/21/2015

Denied

Unpublished
#### State v. Heffington

111,448

09/14/2015

Denied

Unpublished
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2019085EN.01000501.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 7.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 85/5 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9280 — DXC Technology Company/Luxoft Holding, Inc.)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 85/05)

1.

On 1 March 2019, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2019085EN.01000501-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | DXC Technology Company (‘DXC’, USA), and |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Luxoft Holding, Inc. (‘Luxoft’, Switzerland). |

DXC acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Luxoft.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | DXC offers end-to-end IT services to private and public sector clients from a diverse array of industries, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Luxoft offers strategic consulting, custom software development services and digital solution engineering to clients in a number of industries. |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2019085EN.01000501-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9280 — DXC Technology Company/Luxoft Holding, Inc.

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2019085EN.01000501-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2019085EN.01000501-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21
                                                                      ----------


                          SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT*
                          ---------------------------

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                        STATE OR
                                                     JURISDICTION OF     PERCENT OF
                  NAME**                             INCORPORATION       OWNERSHIP
                  ------                             -------------       ---------
<S>                                                  <C>                   <C>
Rubbermaid Commercial Products Inc.                  Delaware              100%
The Little Tikes Company                             Ohio                  100%
Rubbermaid Canada Inc.                               Ontario, Canada       100%
Rubbermaid Office Products Inc.                      Delaware              100%
Rubbermaid Specialty Products Inc.                   Delaware              100%

<FN>
*   All of the listed subsidiaries are included in Registrant's
    consolidated financial statements.

**  All subsidiaries conduct their businesses under the names shown.
</TABLE>
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1027 

KA 13-01496 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, VALENTINO, WHALEN, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

RICHARD J. TRATHEN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

 

PAUL B. WATKINS, FAIRPORT, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

DONALD G. O’GEEN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, WARSAW (VINCENT A. HEMMING OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Wyoming County Court (Mark H. Dadd,

J.), rendered July 11, 2013. The judgment convicted defendant, upon

his plea of guilty, of driving while intoxicated, a class E felony. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his

plea of guilty of driving while intoxicated (Vehicle and Traffic Law §

1192 [3]), defendant contends that his plea was not knowing, voluntary

and intelligent because County Court failed specifically to advise him

that, upon his guilty plea, his driver’s license would be revoked for

a period of one year. Although defendant’s contention survives his

waiver of the right to appeal (see People v Robinson, 112 AD3d 1349,

1349, lv denied ___ NY3d ___ [July 21, 2014]; People v Rossborough,

101 AD3d 1775, 1776), it is not preserved for our review because

defendant did not move to withdraw his plea or to vacate the judgment

of conviction (see Rossborough, 101 AD3d at 1776; People v Newman

[appeal No. 1], 231 AD2d 875, 875, lv denied 89 NY2d 944). In any

event, defendant’s contention is without merit. Although a court must

explain the direct consequences of a guilty plea, the court “has no

obligation to explain to defendants who plead guilty the possibility

that collateral consequences may attach to their criminal convictions”

(People v Catu, 4 NY3d 242, 244; see generally People v Jones, 118

AD3d 1360, 1361). The Court of Appeals has expressly stated that the

“loss of a driver’s license” is a collateral consequence of a

conviction (People v Ford, 86 NY2d 397, 403), and we have accordingly

held that a “court’s failure to disclose that consequence during the

plea colloquy does not warrant vacatur of the plea” (People v Gerald,

103 AD3d 1249, 1250). Here, the record establishes that defendant was

in fact informed that, as a consequence of his guilty plea, his

license would be revoked. Inasmuch as the court was not “obligat[ed]

to explain . . . [even] that collateral consequence[]” (Catu, 4 NY3d
-2- 1027 

KA 13-01496 

at 244), we reject defendant’s contention that the court was obligated

to advise him that the revocation period would be exactly one year. 

We have reviewed defendant’s remaining contentions and conclude that

they are without merit.

Entered: October 3, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
EXHIBIT 10.2


                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION
                                  CERTIFICATION

           (pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

          In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2002 of Elbit Systems Ltd. (the "Company") as filed with the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") on the date hereof
(the "Report") and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Joseph Ackerman, President and
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, that:

         (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                               By:   /s/ Joseph Ackerman
                                               -------------------------
                                               Name:  Joseph Ackerman

                                               Title: President, Chief Executive
                                               Officer and Director
                                               Date: June 17, 2003

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Elbit Systems Ltd. and will be retained by Elbit Systems Ltd.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.