alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 62 (Tuesday, April 1, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 15565]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-8220]



[[Page 15565]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES INFORMATION AGENCY


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations

    Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to 
the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 
985, 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978 (43 FR 
13359, March 29, 1978), and Delegation Order No. 85-5 of June 27, 1985 
(50 FR 27393, July 2, 1985), I hereby determine that the ten objects 
(See list \1\), to be exhibited in the Korean galleries of the Asian 
Art Museum in San Francisco, imported from abroad for the temporary 
exhibition without profit within the United States, are of cultural 
significance. These objects are imported pursuant to a loan agreement 
with the foreign lenders. I also determine that the exhibition or 
display of the listed exhibit objects at the Asian Art Museum of San 
Francisco from on or about May 2, 1997, through March 1, 1999, is in 
the national interest. Public Notice of these determinations is ordered 
to be published in the Federal Register.

    \1\ A copy of this list may be obtained by contacting Ms. Neila 
Sheahan, Assistant General Counsel, at 202/619-5030, and the address 
is Room 700, U.S. Information Agency, 301 4th Street, SW., 
Washington, DC. 20547-0001.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Dated: March 27, 1997.
Les Jin,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 97-8220 Filed 3-31-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8230-01-M
No. 12-5779.

#### Kilburn *v.*Spencer, Commissioner, Massachusetts Department of Correction.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certio-rari denied.
CHIEF JUSTICE

 ROGELIO VALDEZ

JUSTICES

 NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ

 DORI CONTRERAS GARZA

 GINA M. BENAVIDES

 GREGORY T. PERKES

 NORA L. LONGORIA

CLERK

 CECILE FOY GSANGER

NUECES COUNTY COURTHOUSE

901 LEOPARD, 10TH FLOOR

CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401

361-888-0416 (TEL)

361-888-0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY

ADMINISTRATION BLDG.

100 E. CANO, 5TH FLOOR

EDINBURG, TEXAS 78539

956-318-2405 (TEL)

956-318-2403 (FAX)

www.txcourts.gov/13thcoa

Court of Appeals 

Thirteenth District of Texas 

June 18, 2015

Hon. Theodore C. Hake

Asst. Criminal District Attorney

Hidalgo County Courthouse

100 N. Closner, 3rd Floor

Edinburg, TX 78539

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Hon. Johnathan T. Ball

Attorney at Law

6521 N. 10th Street, Ste. A

McAllen, TX 78504

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Re: Cause No. 13-13-00094-CR

Tr.Ct.No. CR-5335-11-C

Style: SERGIO ALBERTO GOMEZ v. THE STATE OF TEXAS

Enclosed please find the opinion and judgment issued by the Court on this date.

Very truly yours,

Cecile Foy Gsanger, Clerk

CFG:ch

Enc.

cc: 139th District Court (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Hon. Laura Hinojosa, Hidalgo County District Clerk (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Hon. J. Rolando Olvera Jr., Presiding Judge, Fifth Administrative Judicial Region

(DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)
# C_2018413EN.01000101.xml

| 14.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 413/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 413/1

---

AGENCY FOR THE COOPERATION OF ENERGY REGULATORS

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2017

(2018/C 413/01)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

https://www.acer.europa.eu/en/The_agency/Organisation/Administrative_Board/Pages/Opinions.aspx

---
# Table 8.6

# RSE 8.6

# Microsoft_Word_Document1.docx

# image1.emf

# Microsoft_Word_Document2.docx

# image2.emf
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF WATERMARK INVESTORS
REALTY TRUST FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          10,714
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,714
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       196,235
<OTHER-SE>                                   (345,570)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,714
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                21,055
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,046
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (31,101)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (31,101)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (31,101)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.6)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Kathleen M. BURKE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Nancy A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner Social Security, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 16-35764

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 6, 2018 *

Filed March 07, 2018

Christopher Dellert, Attorney, Dellert Baird Law Office, Seattle, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellant

Franco Luciano Becia, Esquire, Assistant Regional Counsel, Jeffrey Eric Staples, SSA—Social Security Administration, Office of the General Counsel, Seattle,' WA, Helen J. Brunner, Esquire, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Kerry Keefe, Assistant U.S. Attorney, DOJ-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Seattle, WA,

Before: THOMAS, Chief Circuit Judge, and TROTT and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Kathleen Burke appeals the district court’s denial of her application for fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act following our remand of her previous Social Security disability benefits appeal. We review the district court’s order for an abuse of discretion. *Decker v. Berryhill,*856 F.3d 659, 663 (9th Cir. 2017). We affirm.

The district court did not improperly reconsider the merits of Burke’s disability claim. It properly focused on the nature and scope of our remand to determine whether both the government’s litigation position and ALJ’s position had a reasonable basis in fact and law. *Id.*at 664; *Gardner v. Berryhill,*856 F.3d 652, 656 (9th Cir. 2017); *Sampson v. Chater,*103 F.3d 918, 922 (9th Cir. 1996). It reasonably concluded that it did.

Nor did the district court ignore an independent reason for remand. Our holding that the ALJ failed to develop the record to support three of the adverse credibility findings was intertwined with and dependent upon our holding that the adverse credibility findings were unsupported by the record. We specifically rejected Burke’s argument that the ALJ otherwise failed to develop the record.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by holding that both the ALJ’s decision and the government’s litigation *754position had a reasonable basis in fact and law. Burke never disputed that she made inconsistent statements about her medical condition and why she stopped working. As a matter of law, inconsistent statements may support adverse credibility determinations. *Tommasetti v. Astrue,*533 F.3d 1035, 1039 (9th Cir. 2008). Finally, the district court could consider disagreement among the federal judges in deciding substantial justification. *Meier v. Colvin,*727 F.3d 867, 873 (9th Cir. 2013); *Lewis v. Barnhart,*281 F.3d 1081, 1084 (9th Cir. 2002).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
#### State v. Dutcher

107,319

08/19/13

Denied.

Unpublished
|                                                                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                   
|View History:                                                                                    
|                                                                                                 
|Percent of Commercial Natural Gas Deliveries in New Hampshire Represented by the Price  (Percent)
|                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                 
|Percent of Commercial Natural Gas Deliveries in New Hampshire Represented by the Price  (Percent)
|                                                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 99.2   | 96.9   | 92.4   | 94.1   | 93.2  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 86.4   | 86.6   | 80.6   | 79.2   | 74.9   | 75.7   | 75.4   | 71.2   | 58.9   | 53.9  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 57.3   | 55.6   | 51.8   | 50.2   | 57.0   | 58.4   | 53.7   | 54.0   | 56.4   | 57.7  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 59.8   | 59.4   | 60.2   | NA     |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 71 (Monday, April 14, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 18160]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-9489]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster #2935; Amendment #1]


State of Indiana

    In accordance with a notice from the Federal Emergency Management 
Agency, dated March 31, 1997, the above-numbered Declaration is hereby 
amended to close the incident period for this disaster effective March 
31, 1997.
    All other information remains the same, i.e., the termination date 
for filing applications for physical damage is May 4, 1997 and for 
economic injury the deadline is December 8, 1997.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008.)

    Dated: April 2, 1997.
Bernard Kulik,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 97-9489 Filed 4-11-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
No. 12-5994.

#### Adderly *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### State v. Ruiz

108,573

02/12/14

Denied.

Unpublished
H. Res. 144 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

February 26, 2019. 

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order to consider in the House the joint resolution 

(H.J. Res. 46) relating to a national emergency declared by 

the President on February 15, 2019. All points of order 

against consideration of the joint resolution are waived. The 

joint resolution shall be considered as read. All points of 

order against provisions in the joint resolution are waived. 

The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 

joint resolution and on any amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking 

minority member of the Committee on Transportation and 

Infrastructure; and (2) one motion to recommit. 

SEC. 2. The provisions of section 202 of the National 

Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622) shall not apply during the 

remainder of the One Hundred Sixteenth Congress to a joint 
2 

•HRES 144 EH 

resolution terminating the national emergency declared by the 

President on February 15, 2019. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
No. 12-5964.

#### Wallace *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Multi-Color Corporation, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Francis
D. Gerace, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  August 12, 2002            By:  /s/ Francis D. Gerace
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                           Francis D. Gerace
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. JUDY SPRANKLE, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 356 WAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 26th day of November, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
#### State v. Capps

105,653

08/19/13

Denied. ...

Unpublished
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 407 

Congratulating the Concordia University-St. Paul volleyball team on winning 

their third consecutive NCAA Division II Women’s Volleyball National 

Championship. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 4, 2010 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating the Concordia University-St. Paul volleyball 

team on winning their third consecutive NCAA Division 

II Women’s Volleyball National Championship. 

Whereas, on December 5, 2009, Concordia University won 

the 2009 NCAA Division II Women’s Volleyball National 

Championship; 

Whereas the victory marks the third straight NCAA Division 

II Women’s Volleyball National Championship for 

Concordia University; 

Whereas the Concordia University program is the first in the 

history of Division I or II women’s volleyball to win 3 

consecutive National Championships; 

Whereas Concordia University won the match against Western Texas A&M in 3 straight sets, capping off a perfect 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 407 IS 

37–0 season and continuing the NCAA-record 74 match 

win streak for Concordia University; 

Whereas, on November 7, 2009, Concordia University won 

their seventh consecutive Northern Sun Intercollegiate 

Conference Volleyball Championship; 

Whereas with the undefeated season, head coach Brady 

Starkey’s career record with Concordia University is 

240–20; 

Whereas Concordia University had 5 players named to the 

2009 NCAA Women’s Volleyball Championship All-Tournament Team, Maggie McNamara, Mary Slinger, Cassie 

Haag, Emily Palkert, and Megan Carlson; and 

Whereas nearly 2,000 fans attended the championship match 

in support of the Concordia University team: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) congratulates the Concordia University-St. 

3 Paul volleyball team on winning their third consecu4 tive NCAA Division II Women’s Volleyball National 

5 Championship; and 

6 (2) recognizes— 

7 (A) the achievements of the players, coach8 es, students, and staff whose hard work and 

9 dedication helped Concordia University win the 

10 2009 NCAA Division II Women’s Volleyball 

11 National Championship; and 

12 (B) Concordia University President Dr. 

13 Robert Holst and Athletic Director Tom 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 407 IS 

1 Rubbelke, who both have shown great leader2 ship in bringing success to Concordia Univer3 sity. 

Æ 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 495 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 495

   Recognizing the continued importance of volunteerism and national 
    service and commemorating the anniversary of the signing of the 
 landmark service legislation, the Edward M. Kennedy Serve America Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 22, 2010

Ms. Mikulski submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
        the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Recognizing the continued importance of volunteerism and national 
    service and commemorating the anniversary of the signing of the 
 landmark service legislation, the Edward M. Kennedy Serve America Act.

Whereas, April 21, 2010, marks the first anniversary of the signing of the Serve 
        America Act (Public Law 111-13; 123 Stat. 1460) (also known as the 
        ``Edward M. Kennedy Serve America Act'');
Whereas the Serve America Act reauthorized the Corporation for National and 
        Community Service and the programs of the Corporation through 2014, 
        expanding opportunities for millions of people in the United States to 
        serve this Nation;
Whereas the United States is experiencing a wave of new innovation and 
        collaboration to increase volunteerism, as social entrepreneurs try new 
        approaches, technology increases access and expands service, and 
        corporate volunteers provide pro bono skills to nonprofit organizations;
Whereas the Serve America Act increases volunteer opportunities for people of 
        all ages in the United States, with a focus on disadvantaged youth, 
        seniors, and veterans;
Whereas the Serve America Act promotes social innovation by supporting and 
        expanding proven programs and builds the capacity of individuals, 
        nonprofit organizations, and communities to volunteer; and
Whereas the Serve America Act leverages service to assist in meeting challenges 
        in the areas of education, health, clean energy, veterans assistance, 
        and economic opportunity: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) recognizes that service is of significant value to the 
        United States;
            (2) commemorates the first anniversary of the Serve America 
        Act (Public Law 111-13; 123 Stat. 1460) (also known as the 
        ``Edward M. Kennedy Serve America Act''); and
            (3) encourages every person in the United States to 
        continue to answer the call to serve.
                                 <all>
```
FILE COPY 

# itooof^tv IT OF APPEALS Appeals District IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

NO. 12-0421

J. MARK SWINNEA v. ERI CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. AND LARRY G. SNODGRASS § L US* Smith County,"

12th District.
January 18, 2013 Petitioner's petition for review, filed herein in the above numbered and styled case, having been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby is, denied.

*••••••*•• I, BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, Clerk ofthe Supreme Court ofTexas, do hereby certify that the above and attached is a true and correct copy of the orders of the Supreme Court of Texas in the case numbered and styled as above, as the same appear ofrecord in the minutes of said Court under the date shown. It is further ordered that petitioner, J. MARK SWINNEA, pay all costs incurred on this petition. WITNESS my hand and seal of the Supreme Court of Texas, at the City of Austin, this the 13th day ofMarch, 2013. Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk By Kathy Sandoval, Deputy ClerkFILE COPY


### The Twelfth Court of Appeals 

### Tyler, Texas Supreme Court No. 12-0421 

### Court of Appeals No. 12-05-00428-CV Please note Rule 18.5 Tex. R. App. P.: Ifthe Supreme Court declines to 

### grant review, any unpaid Supreme Court costs must be included in the court 

### ofappeals' mandate. Ifany fees remain outstanding in the above case, afee listwill accompany this receipt. 

### Certified Copy of order in the above casereceived in the Court of Appeals on . By. 

### Deputy Clerk