alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
April 9, 2010 

Dear Pellet Appliance Manufacturers: 

As you are aware, the EPA has begun to review their 22 year-old New Source 

Performance Standard (NSPS), which regulates the production, sale, and importation of 

all residential wood burning appliances in the U.S. EPA has stated that it is its intent to 

bring all pellet burning appliances-- room heaters, boilers and furnaces-- into this 

program. EPA has also stated that it expects that appliance manufacturers will only allow 

the use of fuel in their appliances that meet a generally accepted standard for fuel 

consistency, such as the proposed Pellet Fuel Institute (PFI) fuel standards. EPA also 

made it clear that manufactures would be expected to test with the lowest grade of fuel 

that they expect to be burned in their appliances. 

Following extensive consultations with EPA during the recent PFI Board of Directors’ 

meeting in Orlando, the PFI Standards Committee is reviewing the proposed standards 

program and soliciting input from Pellet Appliance Manufacturers, such as your 

company. 

This information will be integrated into the input we receive from a similar survey sent to 

fuel manufacturers, as the Standards Committee considers if any adjustments need to be 

made to either the standard, or the process of adopting the standard. 

The PFI standard can be found here [link to : 

http://pelletheat.org/2/StandardSpecificationWithCopyright%20.pdf] and we encourage 

you to pay particular attention to page three [link to Table 1], the specifications sheet for 

the standard. 

While currently there are four grades of fuel in this program, the first two grades, PFI 

Super Premium and PFI Premium, will be the most relevant grades for the residential fuel 

market, and we direct your attention to the two left columns. As you can see, the 

percentage of Inorganic Ash is the principle distinction between the PFI Super Premium, 

and Premium grades. 

The Standards Committee is especially interested in your input with regards to these key 

questions: 

1. Are .5% and 1% ash the appropriate ‘cut points’ for ash content? 

2. The proposed ISO Standard uses .7% and 1.5%, ash content. Could these ‘cut points’ 

be used in North America? How would 1.5% ash affect your appliance? 
3. Do you know the typical temperature range in your burn pot? If you had access to the 

typical ash fusion temperatures would it influence your design? 

4. Besides ash %, are their other key parameters that a fuel standard should address? 

We encourage you to provide your feedback to us via fax (703-522-0548) or you may 

simply reply to this email. We will use your feedback to help us look at the current 

standard and determine what changes should be made to the program in order to meet 

EPA’s requirements for NSPS. 

Please return all responses to us no later than Friday, April 30th. We look forward to 

hearing from you and thank you in advance for your assistance in this crucial matter. 

Sincerely, 

Jeff Thiessen 

President
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 63 (Wednesday, April 2, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15716-15717]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-8293]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institute of Mental Health; Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings of the National Institute of Mental Health Special Emphasis 
Panel:

    Agenda/Purpose: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Committee Name: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel.
    Date: April 3, 1997.
    Time: 3 p.m.
    Place: Parklawn, Room 9C-26, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 
20857.
    Contact Person: Phyllis D. Artis, Parklawn, Room 9C-26, 5600 
Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, Telephone: 301, 443-6470.


[[Page 15717]]


    Committee Name: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel.
    Date: April 9, 1997.
    Time: 4 p.m.
    Place: Parklawn, Room 9C-18, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 
20857.
    Contact Person: Gloria B. Levin, Parklawn, Room 9C-18, 5600 
Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, Telephone: 301, 443-1367.

    The meetings will be closed in accordance with the provisions 
set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
    This notice is being published less than fifteen days prior to 
the meetings due to the urgent need to meet timing limitations 
imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Numbers 93.242, 
93.281, 93.282)

    Dated: March 27, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, National Institutes of Health.
[FR Doc. 97-8293 Filed 4-1-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

AUGUST 1, 2008

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 07-14984

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 06-00435-CR-CC-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

versus 

CORY SEIGNIOUS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Georgia

_________________________

(August 1, 2008)

Before ANDERSON, PRYOR and FAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

R. Gary Spencer, appointed counsel for Cory Seignious in this appeal, has
2

moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has filed a

brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d

493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s

assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent

examination of the record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to

withdraw is GRANTED, and Seignious’s convictions and sentences are

AFFIRMED.
# Table 5.5

# RSE 5.5
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-7656

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
v. STANLEY HOBEREK, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:99-cr-00013; 5:00-cv-00184) Submitted: March 25, 2008 Decided: March 28, 2008 Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Stanley Hoberek, Appellant Pro Se. Robert H. McWilliams, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Stanley Hoberek seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, treating his “Motion to Vacate Judgment of Section 2255 Entered in this Case” and “Motion to Vacate Conviction Based Upon Previously Unavailable Claim” as successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motions, and dismissing them on that basis. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000); Reid v. Angelone , 369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir. 2004). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683- 84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Hoberek has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. Additionally, we construe Hoberek’s notice of appeal and informal brief as an application to file a second or successive- 3 - motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. United States v. Winestock, 340 F.3d 200, 208 (4th Cir. 2003). In order to obtain authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion, a prisoner must assert claims based on either: (1) a new rule of constitutional law, previously unavailable, made retroactive by the Supreme Court to cases on collateral review; or (2) newly discovered evidence, not previously discoverable by due diligence, that would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that, but for constitutional error, no reasonable factfinder would have found the movant guilty of the offense. 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244(b)(2), 2255 (2000). Hoberek’s claims do not satisfy either of these criteria. Therefore, we deny authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
July 9, 2014

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Operations

West Building Ground Floor Room W12-140

1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E.

Washington, D.C. 20590

Sent to web site: http://www.regulations.gov/

Re: Exemption No. 5533, Docket FAA-2000-7980

Ladies/Gentlemen:

In accordance with the Code of Federal Regulations, 14CFR § 11.61, the Air Transport 

Association of America (ATA) dba Airlines for America, on behalf of its member 

airlines1 petitions the Administrator for an extension of Exemption No. 5533J. This 

exemption is scheduled to expire on October 31, 2014.

Exemption 5533J provides relief from 14 CFR § 121.311(b) to allow the member 

airlines of the Airlines for America and other similarly situated Part 121 air carriers 

to permit qualified flight attendants not required by §121.391(c) to perform duties 

related to the safety of the airplane and its occupants during aircraft movement on 

the surface. 

This request does not seek to change the conditions and limitations of the current 

exemption. 

The conditions and circumstances, with regard to public interest and equivalent 

levels of safety, which warranted the original partial grant of exemption, continue to 

 

Operator Members: Alaska Airlines, American Airlines, Atlas Air, Delta Air Lines, Federal Express, 

Hawaiian Airlines, JetBlue Airways, Southwest Airlines, United Airlines, United Parcel Service, and 

US Airways

Associate Members: Air Canada. 
Docket No. FAA-2000-7980 - Exemption No. 5533

July 9, 2014

Page 2

exist. This exemption has been in use for thirteen years with no known compromise 

of safety. 

Furthermore, the renewal of this exemption is not a controversial issue. This petition 

does not seek to establish a precedent, but merely would continue an accepted and 

established practice. Accordingly, Airlines for America requests that publication and 

comment period be waived. (14 CFR §11.87).

A summary of this partition as required by 14 CFR §11.81 is attached.

If any further information or discussion is required, please call me at (202) 626 4011.

Respectfully resubmitted by: 

Mark J. Millam

Managing Director, Safety

1301 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Suite 1100

Washington, D.C. 20004-1707 

(202) 626-4011

mmillam@airlines.org 

Attachment
Attachment

Docket No. FAA-2000-7980

July 9, 2014

SUMMARY OF A4A PETITION

Petitioner: Air Transport Association of America (ATA) dba 

Airlines for America

Regulation Affected: 14 CFR § 121.311(b)

Description of Relief Sought: Renew Exemption No. 5533J with no changes to 

the existing terms except to extend its termination 

date. Exemption 5533K provides relief from Title 

14, Code of Federal Regulations, §121.311(b), to 

the extent necessary to permit non-required flight 

attendants to perform safety-related duties during 

aircraft surface movement.
#### Brown v. State

110,887

07/27/2015

Denied.

Unpublished
Exhibit
31.3



CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT
TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I,
Thomas Eriksson, certify that:



1.
I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of Neonode Inc.; and



2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report.





|Date:
    April 28, 2017 | /s/
    Thomas Eriksson                  
|------------------------ | -----------------------------------------
|                         | Thomas
    Eriksson                      
|                         | President
    and Chief Executive Officer
# C_2018225EN.01005701.xml

| 28.6.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 225/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.6.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 225/57

---

Corrigendum to Commission information notice pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community — Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 216 of 20 June 2018
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 216 of 20 June 2018

(2018/C 225/08)

On page 3, section ‘Period of validity of the contract’:

for:

for:

‘18 February 2019 to 18 February 2022’,

read:

read:

‘18 February 2019 to 17 February 2023’.

---
#### State v. Nelson

108,120

10/07/13

Denied.

Unpublished
EXHIBIT 23 - CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
--------------------------------------------


     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
     (Form S-8 No. 33-37253,  Form S-8 No. 33-37829, Form S-8 No. 33-16362, Form
     S-8 No.  2-93268,  Form S-8 No.  2-65503  and Form  S-8 No.  333-83598)  of
     Scan-Optics,  Inc. of our report dated March 26, 2003,  with respect to the
     consolidated  financial  statements and schedule of  Scan-Optics,  Inc. and
     subsidiaries  included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
     December 31, 2002.


                                             /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Hartford, Connecticut
March 26, 2003
No. 12-5767.

#### Wilson *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000820159
<NAME>                        Enex Oil & Gas Income Program III - Series 4, L.P.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 jan-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   sep-30-1996
<CASH>                                         2687
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  23588
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               30618
<PP&E>                                         1700170
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1342531
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 388257
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          42927
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     218529
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   388257
<SALES>                                        120899
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               120899
<CGS>                                          67553
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  190289
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               122736
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (69390)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
#### State v. Deason

107,546

12/27/13

Denied. ...

Unpublished
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<MULTIPLIER>  1
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       43,540
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                31,793
<ALLOWANCES>                                  7,962
<INVENTORY>                                  98,126
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            170,324
<PP&E>                                      233,818
<DEPRECIATION>                              187,719
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              220,897
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       365,830
<BONDS>                                           0
<COMMON>                                  1,703,416
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       8
<OTHER-SE>                                  160,435
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                220,897
<SALES>                                     164,233
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            164,233
<CGS>                                        71,260
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               198,145
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (33,912)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (33,912)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                (33,912)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.03)
        

</TABLE>
Order entered January 27 , 2023

In The 

### Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 22
- 00592
- CR No. 05
- 22
- 00593
- CR THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellant V. RUBEN A. LARA
- ALVARADO , Appellee
O n Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . F20
- 61117
- U , F20
- 61118
- U O RDER The clerk’s record s in th ese appeals is overdue. The clerk’s record was due July 20, 2022. When it was not filed, we notified Dal las County District Clerk Felicia Pitre by postcard dated July 22, 2022, directing that the record be filed by August 21, 2022. When it was not filed, we ordered Dallas County District Clerk Felicia Pitre to file the clerk’s record by November 22, 2022. To date, the clerk’s record has not been filed.So that th e s e appeal s can proceed, we ORDER Dallas County District Clerk Felicia Pitre to file the clerk’s record s in the s e case s no later than FEBRUARY 13, 2023.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this or der to the Hono rable Stephanie Huff, Presiding Judge, 291st Judicial District Court; Felicia Pitre, Dallas County District Clerk; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
<TABLE> 
                               EXHIBIT 12.1 
                      SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY 
         COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES 
                       AND PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS 
                          (Dollars in thousands)
<CAPTION>
                             1994     1995     1996     1997     1998*    1998**
                           -------- -------- -------- -------- --------- ----------
<S>                             <C>      <C>      <C>     <C>       <C>         <C>
Fixed Charges: 
 
Interest:
  Long-Term Debt           $ 81,749 $ 82,591 $ 76,463 $ 69,546  $ 54,664   $ 54,664
  Short-Term Debt             8,894   17,886   12,635   13,825    12,933     12,933
  Rate Reduction Bonds           --       --       --       --        --     40,912
Amortization of Debt
 Discount and Expense,
 Less Premium                 4,604    4,870    4,881    5,154     7,749      7,749
Interest Portion of 
 Annual Rentals               9,496    9,631    8,446    9,496     8,250      8,250
                           -------- -------- -------- -------- --------- ----------
   Total Fixed 
    Charges                 104,743  114,978  102,425   98,021    83,596    124,508
                           -------- -------- -------- -------- --------- ----------
Preferred Dividends    
 Requirements                 7,663    7,663    6,582    6,582     6,582      6,582
Ratio of Income Before 
 Tax to Net Income          1.83501  1.78991  1.88864  1.91993   1.73993    1.73993
                           -------- -------- -------- -------- --------- ----------
Preferred Dividends 
 for Purpose of Ratio        14,062   13,716   12,431   12,637    11,452     11,452
                           -------- -------- -------- -------- --------- ----------
 Total Fixed Charges
  and Preferred 
  Dividends for
  Purpose of Ratio         $118,805 $128,694 $114,856 $110,658  $ 95,048   $135,960
                           ======== ======== ======== ======== ========= ==========
Earnings:

Net Income (before
 preferred dividend 
 requirements)             $206,296 $219,049 $222,765 $238,232  $191,204   $191,204
Add: 
 Fixed Charges 
  (from above)              104,743  114,978  102,425   98,021    83,596    124,508
 Less: Fixed Charges 
  Capitalized                 1,424    2,040    1,495    2,052       846        846
Taxes on Income             172,259  173,029  197,958  219,156   141,477    141,477
                           -------- -------- -------- -------- --------- ----------
 Total Earnings for 
  Purpose of Ratio         $481,874 $505,016 $521,653 $553,357  $415,431   $456,343
                           ======== ======== ======== ======== ========= ==========
Ratio of Earnings 
 to Combined Fixed 
 Charges and Preferred 
 Dividends                     4.06     3.92     4.54     5.00      4.37       3.36
                           ======== ======== ======== ======== ========= ==========
</TABLE>
*  Not including interest for rate reduction bonds.
** Including interest for rate reduction bonds.