alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 4.10.6

Ministry of the Russian Federation for Communications and Information

Amendment No. 6
to License No. 6038 (registration series A 002831)
dated March 7, 1997

To add an additional clause to the Conditions For Carrying Out Activities Under License No. 6038:

“The Licensee shall effect payments out of income received for the rendered communication and information services, to the account of the Ministry of the Russian Federation for Communications and Information, pursuant to the standards established under Decree No. 380 of the Government of the Russian Federation of April 28, 2000.

Transfer of cash funds shall be effected on a monthly basis subject to the actual income received for the communication and information services rendered in the preceding month, no later than the 20th day of the subsequent month. The amount to be transferred shall be confirmed each quarter upon the provision of accounting reports to the tax agencies.

With a view to effecting control over the completeness of cash transfers to the account of the Ministry of the Russian Federation for Communications and Information, the licensee shall, upon written request of the management of the department for control over communications and information in the relevant political subdivision of the Russian Federation, provide the corresponding accounting report form which reflects the income from the provided communications and information services.

This requirement shall be an inalienable part of the license issued earlier.”

 

	 First Deputy Minister
 of the Russian Federation for
 Communications and Information
 	  
 	 [Signature]
 	  
 	 Yu.A. Pavlenko
 
	  
 	  
 	  
 	  
 	  
 
	  
 	  
 	  
 	  
 	 January 25, 2001
 
	  
 	  
 	  
 	  
 	  
 
	 Head of the Department
 of the Organization
 of Licensing Activity
 
 
 	  
 	 [Signature]
 [Seal]
 	  
 	 B.V. Vorobiev
 
 
 




22
Exhibit 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES

Subsidiary

Jurisdiction of
Incorporation/Formation

Other names d/b/aCrystal River Capital TRS Holdings, Inc.

DelawareCrystal River CDO 2005-1, Ltd.

Cayman IslandsCrystal River CDO 2005-1 LLC

DelawareCRC SPV 1, LLC

DelawareCRC SPV 2, LLC

DelawareCRC SPV 3, LLC

DelawareCrystal River Resecuritization 2006-1 Ltd.

Cayman IslandsCrystal River Resecuritization 2006-1 LLC

DelawareCRZ ABCP Financing LLC

DelawareCRZ Phoenix I LLC

DelawareCRZ Houston I GP LLC

DelawareCRZ Houston I LP

DelawareCRZ Arlington I GP LLC

DelawareCRZ Arlington I LP

Delaware


---



QuickLinks
|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                
|View History:                                                 
|                                                              
|Idaho Natural Gas Industrial Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                              
|                                                              
|Idaho Natural Gas Industrial Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 34,999 | 34,303 | 33,846
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 32,464 | 30,435 | 28,729 | 24,689 | 23,907 | 22,852 | 23,488 | 24,119 | 25,191 | 24,256
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 24,195 | 25,392 | 29,781 | 27,996 | 28,046 | 31,664 | 34,761 | 35,856 | 34,761 | 38,598
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 38,390 | 37,888 | 39,071 | 39,199 |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
#### State v. Lyles

106,249

08/19/13

Denied. ,

Unpublished
#### State v. Enriquez

103,397

05/20/13

Denied.

46 Kan. App. 2d 765
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 21, 2014

No. 04-14-00660-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.A.E. JR.,

From the County Court at Law No 2, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011CVQ002377-C3

Honorable Jesus Garza, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

We grant the court reporter’s motion for extension of time to file the record. We order

the reporter’s record due December 18, 2014. The reporter is advised that no further extensions 

of time will be granted absent a showing of extraordinary circumstances.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 21st day of November, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### State v. Burtin

106,635

09/04/13

Denied

Unpublished
No. 12-6013.

#### Hernandez *v.*United States.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Michigan Supreme

Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 17, 2015 

# Order

March 17, 2015

15 0939 ( 48 )

CITY OF CORUNNA

, Plaintiff

- Appell ant

,

v

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL

QUALITY

, Defendant

- Appell ee

. SC: 150939

COA: 316841

Shiawassee CC: 10

- 001242

- CZ

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiff

- appellant to extend the time

for filing its reply brief is GRANTED. The reply brief will be accepted as timely filed if

submitted on or before March 23, 2015.
Exhibit 32.1

LOUISIANA-PACIFIC CORPORATION

411 Union Street, Suite 2000

Nashville, TN 37219-1700

(615) 986-5600

November 6, 2008

Securities and
Exchange Commission

Judiciary Plaza

450 Fifth Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20549



| | Re: | Certification Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of the Form 10-Q of Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, that, to such officers knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods expressed in the Report.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ RICHARD W. FROSTName: Richard W. FrostTitle: Chief Executive Officer/s/ CURTIS M. STEVENSName: Curtis M. StevensTitle: Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Louisiana-Pacific Corporation and will be retained by Louisiana-Pacific Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Harvey v. State

106,019

09/04/13

Denied.

Unpublished
No. 12-5642.

#### Scott *v.*Iowa et al.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 496 

Designating April 23, 2010, as ‘‘National Adopt A Library Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 22, 2010 

Mr. WEBB (for himself, Mr. WARNER, Mr. COCHRAN, and Ms. SNOWE) 

submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating April 23, 2010, as ‘‘National Adopt A Library 

Day’’. 

Whereas libraries are an essential part of the communities 

and the national system of education in the United 

States; 

Whereas the people of the United States benefit significantly 

from libraries that serve as an open place for people of 

all ages and backgrounds to make use of books and other 

resources that offer pathways to learning, self-discovery, 

and the pursuit of knowledge; 

Whereas the libraries of the United States depend on the 

generous donations and support of individuals and groups 

to ensure that people who are unable to purchase books 

still have access to a wide variety of resources; 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 496 ATS 

Whereas certain nonprofit organizations facilitate the donation of books to schools and libraries across the United 

States— 

(1) to extend the joys of reading to millions of people of the United States; and 

(2) to prevent used books from being thrown away; 

Whereas, as of the date of agreement to this resolution, the 

libraries of the United States have provided valuable resources to individuals affected by the economic crisis by 

encouraging continued education and job training; and 

Whereas several States that recognize the importance of libraries and reading have adopted resolutions commemorating April 23 as ‘‘Adopt A Library Day’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates April 23, 2010, as ‘‘National 

3 Adopt A Library Day’’; 

4 (2) honors the organizations that facilitate do5 nations to schools and libraries; 

6 (3) urges all people of the United States who 

7 own unused books to donate the unused books to 

8 local libraries; 

9 (4) strongly supports children and families who 

10 take advantage of the resources provided by schools 

11 and libraries; and 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 496 ATS 

1 (5) encourages the people of the United States 

2 to observe the day with appropriate ceremonies and 

3 activities. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
#### State v. Parry

113,130

06/21/2016

Granted.

51 Kan. App. 2d 928
No. 12-6331.

#### In re Ramon.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
EXHIBIT 11

RUDDICK CORPORATION
STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARHINGS


                                                 Fiscal Year Ended
                                            ------------------------------
                                               October 1,    October 3,
                                                 2000           1999
                                            --------------  --------------
NET INCOME PER SHARE COMPUTED AS FOLLOWS:
BASIC:
  1.  Net Income available to common
        shareholders                         $  51,002,439   $ 50,714,128
                                             =============  ==============
  2.  Weighted Average Common Shares
        Outstanding - Basic                     46,274,479     46,511,523

  3.  Basic net income per share
         (Item 1 divided by Item 2)          $       1.10    $      1.09
                                              ============  ==============

DILUTED:
  1.  Net Income available to common
        shareholders                         $  51,002,439   $ 50,714,128
                                             =============  ==============
  2.  Weighted Average Common Shares
        Outstanding - Basic                     46,274,479     46,511,523

  3.  Weighted potential shares under stock
        options computed for the periods
        using the Treasury Stock Method.            75,215        235,127
                                             --------------  -------------
  4.  Weighted Average Common Shares
       Outstanding - Diluted Common Equivalent
       Shares Outstanding                       46,349,694     46,746,650
                                             ==============  =============
  5.  Net Income Per Share
        (Item 1 divided by Item 4)              $     1.10    $      1.08
                                             ==============  =============
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 69 (Thursday, April 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 17609]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-9281]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-315-000]


Northwest Pipeline Corporation; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

April 14, 1997.
    Take notice that on April 1, 1997, Northwest Pipeline Corporation 
(Northwest) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Third 
Revised Volume No. 1 and Original Volume No. 2, the tariff sheets 
listed on Appendix A to the filing, to be effective June 1, 1997.
    Northwest states that this filing is submitted to propose a number 
of additions or modifications to its tariff to incorporate changes or 
to provide new services spawned by adoption of the standards of the Gas 
Industry Standards Board as reflected in FERC Order Nos. 587 et seq., 
in Docket Nos. RM96-1-000, et seq. Specifically, Northwest proposes: 
(1) To implement a procedure for providing pooling services to comply 
with the Commission's Order on Compliance Filing issued on February 18, 
1997, in Docket No. RP97-180-000; (2) to restate Northwest's monthly 
rates as daily rates; and (3) to add definitions to clarify terms used 
in the GISB Standards and in Northwest's tariff.
    Any person desiring to be heard or protest this filing should file 
a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance 
with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and 
Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed on or before 
April 21, 1997. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-9281 Filed 4-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# Table 1.2

# RSE 1.2
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 467 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 467

To authorize representation by the Senate Legal Counsel in the case of 
                        Sollars v. Reid, et al.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 23, 2010

Mr. McConnell submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To authorize representation by the Senate Legal Counsel in the case of 
                        Sollars v. Reid, et al.

Whereas, in the case of Sollars v. Reid, et al., Case No. 1:09-CV-361, pending 
        in the United States District Court for the Northern District of 
        Indiana, plaintiff has named as defendants eight Senators; and
Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(1) of the Ethics in Government 
        Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. Sec. Sec.  288b(a) and 288c(a)(1), the Senate may 
        direct its counsel to defend Members of the Senate in civil actions 
        relating to their official responsibilities: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to represent 
all defendant Senators in the case of Sollars v. Reid, et al.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.2
 
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 DATE: October 31, 2008
    By:
    /s/ Herm RosenmanHerm RosenmanSenior Vice President, Finance and
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of The Rowe Companies
(the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended November 28, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gerald M. Birnbach, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, in my capacity as an officer of the Company pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods presented in the financial statements included in the report.
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|/s/    GERALD M.
BIRNBACH            
|Chief Executive Officer and President



April 15, 2005
# m94_55a
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Marty Allen Grounds, Appellant

No. 06-21-00071-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 4th District Court of Rusk

County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. CR20-209). 

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice 

Burgess, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice 

Stevens participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We further order that the appellant, Marty Allen Grounds, pay all costs incurred by 

reason of this appeal.

RENDERED JANUARY 4, 2022

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
### IN THE UNI TED STATES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 11-20201 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. GILBERTO CORONA AGUIRRE, also known as Gilberto A. Corona, also known as Gilbert Augirre Corana, also known as Gilberto Corona-Aguirre, also known as Gilberto Aguirre Corona, also known as Gilberto Augirre Corona, Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:10-CR-755-1
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, GARZA, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal P ub l ic Defender appointed to represent Gilberto Corona Aguirre (Corona) has moved for leave to withdraw and has f i l e d a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Corona has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D Februa ry 17 , 20 12 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 , the cour t hasd ete rm inedt hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t forth in 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 11-20201 Document: 00511761817 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/17/2012No. 11-20201

We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See5 T H C I R
. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 11-20201 Document: 00511761817 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/17/2012