alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2018332EN.01000501.xml

| 19.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 332/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 332/5

---

Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EU) 2016/44 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya apply

(2018/C 332/06)

The attention of data subjects is drawn to the following information in accordance with Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1):

The legal basis for this processing operation is Council Regulation (EU) 2016/44 (2).

The controller of this processing operation is the Council of the European Union represented by the Director-General of DG RELEX (Foreign Affairs, Enlargement, Civil Protection) of the General Secretariat of the Council and the department entrusted with the processing operation is the Unit 1C of DG RELEX that can be contacted at:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG RELEX 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG RELEX 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The purpose of the processing operation is the establishment and updating of the list of persons subject to restrictive measures in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2016/44.

The data subjects are the natural persons who fulfil the listing criteria as laid down in that Regulation.

The personal data collected includes data necessary for the correct identification of the person concerned, the statement of reasons and any other data related thereto.

The personal data collected may be shared as necessary with the European External Action Service and the Commission.

Without prejudice to restrictions provided for in Article 20(1)(a) and (d) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, requests for access, as well as requests for rectification or objection will be answered in accordance with section 5 of Council Decision 2004/644/EC (3).

Personal data will be retained for 5 years from the moment the data subject has been removed from the list of persons subject to the asset freeze or the validity of the measure has expired, or for the duration of court proceedings in the event they had been started.

Data subjects may have recourse to the European Data Protection Supervisor in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.

---

(1)  OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1.

(2)  OJ L 12, 19.1.2016, p. 1.

(3)  OJ L 296, 21.9.2004, p. 16.

---
#### In the Matter of the Application of Robert E. Jones for an Order Removing Actions Involving Criminal Charges Against Marvin L. Wilson, Pending in the City Court of the City of Cortland, to the Town Court of the Town of Cortlandville.

County Court, Cortland County,

February 14, 1972.

*641
      *Robert E. Jones, District Attorney,*petitioner in person.

Richard J. Shay, J.

This is an ex parte application by the People for an order transferring the above-captioned matter, now pending in the City Court of the City of Cortland, to the Town Court of the Town of Cortlandville. The necessity cited for such transfer is the disqualification of the Cortland City Court Judge from further consideration of this case. The City of Cortland does not have, at this time, an Acting or Special Judge. The authority cited is section 170.15 of the Criminal Procedure Law.

I will sign the order of transfer, but feel that my reasoning for so doing should be detailed because of the absence of specific authority in the cited statute for a transfer from a city to a town court.

The obvious intent of revamping and redefining the lower or local criminal court system was to avoid the illogical and confusing distinctions between “magistrate courts ” and “ courts of special sessions ” as contained in the old Code of Criminal Procedure. (See Practice Commentary, McKinney’s Cons. Laws of N. Y., Book 11 A, 10.10, p. 34.) In most instances, the effort would seem successful, but here we find a problem.

Section 170.15 recognizes that there may be situations which make it impossible for a nonfelony case to reach a disposition in the particular local criminal court which has geographical jurisdiction, Unfortunately the solution to this dilemma is only provided for the Town and Justice Courts. The same anomaly exists with respect to the issuance of a warrant in nonfelony cases (CPL 120.30,100.55).

It is my feeling that these discrepancies are mere oversights which will be corrected as the Legislature becomes aware of the problem. A transfer from a City Court in which a disposition was impossible to a town or a village court was clearly authorized under the Code of Criminal Procedure. (See Code Crim. Pro., § 702-a, subd. 2; *People*v. *Esposito,*23 Misc 2d 614.) There seems no valid reason now for excluding the possibility of a city to town or village transfer, even in the absence of specific statutory authority. Failure to sign the proposed order would leave this case in limbo and would deprive this defendant of his right to have the matter disposed of within a reasonable time.
<PAGE>
                                                                     Exhibit 3.3

                          CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF
                              AMENDED AND RESTATED
                        CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF
                             GEN-PROBE INCORPORATED

     GEN-PROBE INCORPORATED, a Delaware corporation (the "CORPORATION"), does
hereby certify that:

     FIRST: The name of the Corporation is GEN-PROBE INCORPORATED.

     SECOND: The date on which the original Certificate of Incorporation of the
Corporation was filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware is
July 27, 1987.

     THIRD: The Board of Directors of the Corporation, acting in accordance with
the provisions of Sections 141 and 242 of the General Corporation Law of the
State of Delaware (the "DGCL"), adopted resolutions providing that it was
advisable and in the best interests of the Corporation that the first paragraph
of Article Fourth of the Corporation's Amended and Restated Certificate of
Incorporation be amended in its entirety to read as follows:

     "FOURTH: The Corporation is authorized to issue two classes of stock to be
     designated, respectively, Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share
     ("Common Stock"), and Preferred Stock, par value $0.0001 per share
     ("Preferred Stock"). The total number of shares the Corporation shall have
     the authority to issue is 220,000,000 shares, 200,000,000 shares of which
     shall be Common Stock and 20,000,000 shares of which shall be Preferred
     Stock."

     FOURTH: Thereafter, pursuant to a resolution of the Board of Directors,
this Certificate of Amendment was submitted to the stockholders of the
Corporation for their approval, and was duly adopted in accordance with the
provisions of Section 242 of the DGCL.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Gen-Probe Incorporated has caused this Certificate of
Amendment to be signed by its Vice President and General Counsel this 28th day
of May, 2004.

                                      GEN-PROBE INCORPORATED

                                      By: /s/ R. William Bowen
                                          -----------------------
                                              R. William Bowen
                                              Vice President and General Counsel


      State of Delaware
     Secretary of State
  Division of Corporations
Delivered 11:38 AM 06/01/2004
  FILED 09:19 AM 06/01/2004
SRV 040403124 - 2133133 FILE
**EXHIBIT 32.1**
 
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
  In
            connection with the Quarterly Report of Lufkin Industries, Inc. (the
“Company”)
            on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the
            Securities
            and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Douglas V. Smith,
            Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as
            adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
            that:
 (1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
                as
                applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and 
 (2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company. 
 /s/
                  Douglas V. Smith
 Douglas
        V. Smith
 Chief
        Executive Officer
 June
          1,
          2007
  This
        certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. §1350, and not for any
        other purpose.
EXHIBIT 21


                               RUDDICK CORPORATION

                               Affiliated Companies
                             as of December 28, 1998

      Listed below are the domestic subsidiaries of Ruddick Corporation, (the
"Registrant") all of which are wholly owned and are owned directly by the
Registrant, unless otherwise indicated.

      American & Efird, Inc.
      American & Efird Services, Inc.(1)
      A&E Export, Inc.(1)
      Harris Teeter, Inc.
      Harris Teeter Properties, LLC(2)
      Harris-Teeter Services, Inc.(2)
      Harris Teeter Resources, Inc. (2)
      Ruddick of Delaware, Inc.
      R. S. Dickson & Company (dba Ruddick Investment Company)
      Ruddco Management, Inc.(3)


      (1) Owned by American & Efird, Inc.
      (2) Owned by Harris Teeter, Inc.
      (3) Owned by R. S. Dickson & Company


      Listed below are the foreign subsidiaries of the Registrant, all of which
are wholly owned through American & Efird, Inc., unless otherwise indicated.

      American & Efird (HK) Limited (1)
      A&E Korea Ltd.
      American & Efird (GB) Limited (2)
      American & Efird Canada, Inc.
      Hilos A&E de Costa Rica, S.A.
      Hilos A&E de Honduras, S.A. de C.V. (3)
      American & Efird International (FE) Limited
      American & Efird de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.(4)
      American & Efird Mills (S) Pte. Ltd.
      American & Efird (Malaysia) SDN BHD
      Hengmei Spinning Company, Ltd. - Joint venture, 60% owned
      Hilos A&E Dominicana, Ltd. - Joint venture, 49% owned
      American & Efird Italia S.p.A. - Joint venture, 49% owned
      A&E Amann India Private Ltd. - Joint venture, 33 1/3% owned (5)

      In addition, in the normal course of business, R. S. Dickson & Company
from time to time makes investments in corporations and partnerships that may
result in ownership of capital stock or other interests as an investment.
<PAGE>




(1) In order to comply with Hong Kong law, one share of such entity is owned of
    record by a person designated by American & Efird, Inc. 

(2) In order to comply with  British  law, one share each of such entity is
    owned of record by two persons designated by American & Efird, Inc.

(3) In order to comply with  Honduran law, one share each of such entity is
    owned of record by four persons designated by American & Efird, Inc.

(4) In order to comply with  Mexican  law, one share each of such entity is
    owned of record by three persons designated by American & Efird, Inc.

(5) In order to comply with Indian law,  100 shares of such entity is owned
    of record by a person designated by American & Efird, Inc.
# Table 3.3

# RSE 3.3

# Microsoft_Word_Document1.docx

# image1.emf

# Microsoft_Word_Document2.docx

# image2.emf
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of LSB Industries, Inc. (“LSB”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Tony M. Shelby, Executive Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of LSB, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of LSB.














/s/ Tony M. Shelby


Tony M. Shelby


Executive Vice President of Finance and


Chief Financial Officer


(Principal Financial Officer)








November 4, 2010








This certification is furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. §1350 subject to the knowledge standard contained therein and not for any other purpose.
#### State v. Hartzell

107,702

10/28/13

Denied. ...

Unpublished
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |               |   |   |   |   |   |                         |
|--------|--------|--------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|------------------------------|
|   |   |               |   |   |
| Date:  |   | September 13, 2010 |   |   |   | By:    |   | /s/ Alain Ghiai              |
|   |   |               |   |   |   |   |   | Alain Ghiai                  |
|   |   |               |   |   |   |   |   | Principal Accounting Officer |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the balance
sheet as of December 31, 1998, and statements of operations for the six months
ended Decmeber 31, 1998, and is qualifed in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-30-1998
<CASH>                                          13,693
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               296,234
<PP&E>                                         208,562
<DEPRECIATION>                                 128,317
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 726,479
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           67,034
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    292,786
<COMMON>                                     4,756,739
<OTHER-SE>                                 (4,489,476)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   726,479
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,432
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               550,916
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,541
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (539,320)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (539,320)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (539,320)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.31)
        

</TABLE>
#### State v. Jenkins

104,671

04/08/13

Denied. .

Unpublished
EXHIBIT - 32.2
--------------



                                  CERTIFICATION


     I, Peter Stelling, the Chief Financial Officer and Vice President of
Scan-Optics, Inc. (the "Company") certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (i) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended
          December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section
          13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (ii) the information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly
          presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
          results of operations of the Company.

Date     March 30, 2004                  By: /  ss/
     ---------------------                   -----------------------------------
                                             Peter Stelling
                                             Chief Financial Officer and
                                             Vice President
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

JOSEPHUS WILLIAMS, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-2987 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed September 13, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Charles E. Roberts, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Richard P. Albertine, Jr., Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

KHOUZAM, Chief Judge.

This is Josephus Williams' Anders 1 appeal of the revocation of his probation and the resulting sentence of fifteen years in prison for fleeing or attempting to

1 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).- 2 -

elude a law enforcement officer. We affirm in all respects except we remand for the entry of an amended revocation order.

The record shows that an affidavit was filed alleging Williams had committed three violations of condition five of his probation by failing to live without violating any law. Following an evidentiary hearing, the court found that Williams had willfully and substantially violated his probation and a revocation order was entered. However, the revocation order does not specify the conditions that Williams was found to have violated. Accordingly, we must remand for the entry of an order that delineates the specific conditions Williams was found to have violated. See Montonez v. State, 724 So. 2d 650, 651 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999).

Affirmed and remanded with instructions.
NORTHCUTT and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
# C_2019055EN.01000102.xml

| 12.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 55/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 55/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9230 — Allianz/DIF/InfraRed Capital Partners/Daiwater)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 55/02)

On 4 February 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9230. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9230. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Nigel A. Vinecombe, President and Chief Executive Officer of Multi-Color Corporation (the Company), certify pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 9, 2012



By:

/s/ Nigel A. VinecombeNigel A. VinecombePresident and Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



30