alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit  10.13

Sequiam  Corporation

June  18,  2003

Charles  D.  Vollmer
President, Sequiam Information Management Systems, Inc.
1645  White  Pine  Drive
Vienna,  VA  22182
703-319-2090

Dear  Mr.  Vollmer:

This  will  serve  to  amend your employment agreement to expand your duties and
responsibilities  to  include  that  of  Vice  President Sales and Marketing for
Sequiam  Corporation.  Those duties will include overall management of the sales
and  marketing  strategies  for  each  of  Sequiam's  subsidiary  companies that
include:  Sequiam  Software,  Inc.,  Sequiam  Communications,  Inc.,  Sequiam
Biometrics,  Inc.,  Sequiam  Education,  Inc. and Sequiam Information Management
Systems,  Inc.

If you are in agreement with the forgoing please acknowledge below.

Sincerely,

/s/  Mark  L.  Mroczkowski

Mark  L.  Mroczkowski
Senior  Vice  President



Agreed  and  accepted  by:
June  18,  2003


/s/  Charles  D.  Vollmer
Charles  D.  Vollmer


                      300 Sunport Lane - Orlando, FL 32809
                    407-541-0773 (voice) - 407-240-1431 (fax)
                                 www.Sequiam.com


                                                          Exhibit 10.13 - page 1
<PAGE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                              THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL 
                              INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CORPORATION'S 
                              CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, CONSOLIDATED
                              STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND CONSOLIDATED 
                              STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                  JAN-03-1998
<CASH>                                        11,202
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 138,726
<ALLOWANCES>                                  7,634
<INVENTORY>                                   51,339
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              224,426
<PP&E>                                        886,532
<DEPRECIATION>                                384,422
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                1,034,706
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         155,443
<BONDS>                                       214,234
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                      5,919
<OTHER-SE>                                    523,548
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  1,034,706
<SALES>                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              1,007,903
<CGS>                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 748,986
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              141,723
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              4,228
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            18,108
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               100,500
<INCOME-TAX>                                  31,330
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           63,170
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                  63,170
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 1.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 1.07
        


</TABLE>
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-24-00292-CV

In re Phillip “Baby Shark” Scott

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM COMAL COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Relator Phillip “Baby Shark” Scott has filed an original application for writ of 

habeas corpus complaining that the trial court allegedly held an ex parte competency hearing as 

part of Relator’s underlying criminal proceeding. See Tex. Code Crim. Pro. art. 46B.005

(“Determining Incompetence to Stand Trial”).1 “The Texas Constitution grants courts of appeals 

original jurisdiction only where specifically prescribed by law.” Ex parte Braswell, 630 S.W.3d 

600, 601 (Tex. App.—Waco 2021, no pet.). This Court does not have original habeas corpus 

jurisdiction in criminal cases. See Tex. Const. art. V, § 6; Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221(d) (limiting 

original habeas corpus jurisdiction of courts of appeals to certain orders, processes, or 

commitments arising in civil cases); see also Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.05 (vesting “power to

issue the writ of habeas corpus” to Court of Criminal Appeals, district courts, and county courts

and their judges). As an intermediate appellate court, our habeas corpus jurisdiction in 

1

 Relator separately filed a petition for writ of mandamus based on substantially similar 

grounds. In re Scott, No. 03-24-00157-CV, 2024 WL 1098217, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin 

Mar. 14, 2024, orig. proceeding).
2

criminal matters is appellate only. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221(d); see also In re Wilkins, 

No. 03-20-00381-CV, 2020 WL 5608486, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin Sept. 17, 2020, 

orig. proceeding).

Accordingly, we dismiss Relator’s application for want of jurisdiction. See

Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

__________________________________________

Darlene Byrne, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Smith and Theofanis

Filed: May 10, 2024
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Lawson Software, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period
ended May 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stefan B. Schulz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



/s/ STEFAN B. SCHULZ Stefan B. Schulz Senior Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerJuly 15, 2010


---
#### Macomber v. Kansas Dept. of Corrections

112,244

07/27/2015

Denied.

Unpublished
|                                                                
|----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                  
|View History:                                                   
|                                                                
|Hawaii Natural Gas Residential Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                
|                                                                
|Hawaii Natural Gas Residential Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 1,416  | 1,289  | 1,197  | 1,121  | 1,048  | 625    | 579    | 591    | 563    | 565   
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 565    | 545    | 551    | 558    | 578    | 574    | 540    | 517    | 535    | 524   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 535    | 537    | 539    | 537    | 524    | 516    | 518    | 509    | 499    | 510   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 509    | 486    | 481    | 582    | 583    | 572    | 571    | 572    | 590    | 576   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 603    | 618    | 599    | 597    |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
# C_2018325EN.01000401.xml

| 14.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 325/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 325/4

---

Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1230 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine apply

(2018/C 325/04)

The attention of data subjects is drawn to the following information in accordance with Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1):

The legal basis for this processing operation is Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 (2), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1230 (3).

The controller of this processing operation is the Council of the European Union represented by the Director-General of DG RELEX (Foreign Affairs, Enlargement, Civil Protection) of the General Secretariat of the Council and the department entrusted with the processing operation is the Unit 1C of DG RELEX that can be contacted at:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG RELEX 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG RELEX 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The purpose of the processing operation is the establishment and updating of the list of persons subject to restrictive measures in accordance with Regulation EU) No 269/2014 as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1230.

The data subjects are the natural persons who fulfil listing criteria as laid down in that Regulation.

The personal data collected includes data necessary for the correct identification of the person concerned, the Statement of Reasons and any other data related thereto.

The personal data collected may be shared as necessary with the European External Action Service and the Commission.

Without prejudice to restrictions provided for in Article 20(1)(a) and (d) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, requests for access, as well as requests for rectification or objection will be answered in accordance with section 5 of Council Decision 2004/644/EC (4).

Personal data will be retained for 5 years from the moment the data subject has been removed from the list of persons subject to the asset freeze or the validity of the measure has expired, or for the duration of court proceedings in the event they had been started.

Data subjects may have recourse to the European Data Protection Supervisor in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.

---

(1)  OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1.

(2)  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 6.

(3)  OJ L 231, 14.9.2018, p. 1.

(4)  OJ L 296, 21.9.2004, p. 16.

---
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 97-11086

Summary Calendar

____________________

JAMES E. HARTNETT,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

TEXAS COMMERCE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION;

THE CHASE MANHATTAN CORPORATION,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

(3:97-CV-507-H)

_________________________________________________________________

March 19, 1998

Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

James E. Hartnett, pro se, appeals the denial of his motion to

reconsider the dismissal, without prejudice, of his complaint

against Texas Commerce Bank National Association and The Chase

Manhattan Corporation. Pursuant to our review of the record, we

conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion by
- 2 -

refusing to reconsider its decision that it did not have subject

matter jurisdiction.

AFFIRMED
================================================================================

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1



          CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
                     OFFICER OF SPARTA SURGICAL CORPORATION
             FORM 10-QSB/A FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED AUGUST 31, 2006
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES -OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I am the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of placeCitySparta
Surgical Corporation, a placeStateDelaware corporation (the "Company". I am
delivering this certificate in connection with the Form 10-QSB/A of the Company
for the six months ended August 31, 2006 and filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission ("Form 10-QSB").

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
the Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respect, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: February 20, 2007                        /s/ Allan J. Korn
                                              ------------------------
                                              Allan J. Korn
                                              Chief Executive Officer
                                              Chief Financial Officer










--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### State v. Ward

109,325

06/21/2016

Granted.

Unpubhshed
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 135 

Designating May 8, 2009, as ‘‘Military Spouse Appreciation Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 6, 2009 

Mr. BURR (for himself and Mrs. FEINSTEIN) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating May 8, 2009, as ‘‘Military Spouse Appreciation 

Day’’. 

Whereas the month of May marks National Military Appreciation Month; 

Whereas military spouses provide vital support to men and 

women in the Armed Forces and help to make their service to the Armed Forces possible; 

Whereas military spouses have been separated from their 

loved ones because of deployment in support of the Global War on Terrorism and other military missions carried 

out by the Armed Forces; 

Whereas the establishment of Military Spouse Appreciation 

Day would be an appropriate way to honor the spouses 

of members of the Armed Forces; and 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 135 ATS 

Whereas May 8, 2009, would be an appropriate date to establish as ‘‘Military Spouse Appreciation Day’’: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates May 8, 2009, as ‘‘Military 

3 Spouse Appreciation Day’’; 

4 (2) honors and recognizes the contributions 

5 made by spouses of members of the Armed Forces; 

6 and 

7 (3) encourages the people of the United States 

8 to observe Military Spouse Appreciation Day to pro9 mote awareness of the contributions of spouses of 

10 members of the Armed Forces and the importance 

11 of their role in the lives of members of the Armed 

12 Forces and veterans. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to Rule 13a  14(a)
   2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) [omitted]for the registrant and have:
  omitted]
   5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and
the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   /s/ James J. Unger
    
    
    
    March 28, 2006James J. Unger, President and CEO
    
    
    
    Date
 107
#### *In re*L.L.

109,555

02/12/14

Denied

Unpublished
2022 EAVS Data Brief: New Mexico EAVS Jurisdictions:

33 

 Voter Registration 

Active Reg. Voters as of Nov. 8, 20221 

1,198,896 

Reg. Forms Received2* 

489,737 

Total Confirmation Notices Sent3* 

165,358 

Voters Removed from Reg. Rolls4* 

50,335 

Source of Registration Applications5 

Mail, Email, Fax 51.2% 

Motor Vehicle Dept. 22.1%

Online 19.7% 

In Person 5.5% 

Other 1.5% 

 Voting and Turnout 

Voters Participating By Mode6 

7 Turnout 

45.9% 

In-Person 

Election Day

256,438 

36.1% 

Mail 

97,746 

13.8% 

In-Person 

Early 

353,476 

49.8% 

Other 

1,896 

0.3% 

Total Voting Locations8: 760 

Total Poll Workers9: 2,999 

Election Technology 

Percentage of Jurisdictions Using...10 

100.0% 

Electronic

Poll 

Books 

100.0% 

Hand 

Counting 

100.0% 

Scanners 

0.0% 

Ballot 

Marking 

Devices 

0.0% 

DREs w/o 

VVPAT 

0.0% 

DREs with 

VVPAT 

 Mail Ballots 

• 110,577 mail ballots transmitted11 

• 89.0% of transmitted mail ballots returned by voters12 

• 99.3% of returned mail ballots counted13 

• 0.7% of returned mail ballots rejected14 

• Conducted all-mail election in some jurisdictions15 

• Allowed drop boxes16 

• Allowed ballot curing17 

 Election Audits18 

-- Access audit 

-- Ballot design audit 

Ballot reconciliation -- audit 

Compliance/ -- procedural audit 

-- Eligibility audit 

-- Legal audit 

Logic and accuracy ✔ testing 

Post-election ✔ tabulation audit 

✔ Other 

Notes 

EAVS data and reports may be downloaded at www.eac.gov 

/research-and-data/datasets-codebooks-and-surveys. 

Responses of “Does not apply,” “Data not available,” and “Valid 

skip” are shown as zeroes or dashes. Percentages may not sum 

to 100% because of missing data or rounding. 

* Close of registration for 2020 

general election to close of 

registration for 2022 general 

election. 

1 A1b of EAVS. 

2 A3a of EAVS. 

3 A8a of EAVS. 

4 A9a of EAVS. 

5 Mail, Email, Fax is A4a/A3a. 

In Person is A4b/A3a. Online is 

A4c/A3a. Motor Vehicle Dept. is 

A4d/A3a. Other is the sum of 

A4e–A4l/A3a. May not sum to 

100% because of missing data. 

6 In-Person Election Day is F1b. 

Mail is F1d+F1g. In-Person Early 

is F1f. Other is F1c+F1e+F1h. 

7 F1a of EAVS divided by citizen 

voting age population (CVAP). 

8 D2a of EAVS. 

9 D7a of EAVS. 

10 F3a–f, F5a–F9a of EAVS; 

number of jurisdictions that 

responded “Yes” divided by

number of jurisdictions in 

state/territory. 

11 C1a of EAVS. 

12 C1b/C1a of EAVS. 

13 C8a/C1b of EAVS. 

14 C9a/C1b of EAVS. 

15 Q17 and Q17a of Policy 

Survey. 

16 Q19 of Policy Survey. 

17 Q20 of Policy Survey. 

18 Q36 of Policy Survey. See 

survey questionnaire for full 

definitions of each type of 

audit.
No. 12-5810.

#### Quiles *v.*New York.

App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y, 2d Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.
The St. Lawrence Seaway Corporation Annual Report "Form 10-K" (Exhibit 10(vii)(b))



                                                                                  Exhibit 10(vii)(b)

                                  AMENDMENT NUMBER THREE TO COMMON
                                       STOCK WARRANT AGREEMENT

         On September 24, 1986, The St. Lawrence Seaway Corporation (the "Corporation") issued a Common Stock
Purchase Warrant to Bernard Zimmerman and Company, Inc., entitling the holder to purchase an aggregate of 100,000
shares of common stock, $1.00 par value, of the Corporation for $3.00 per share for a period of five (5) years
("Warrant"), pursuant to an Agreement dated September 24, 1986 (the "Warrant Agreement").  The Windward Group, LLC
is now the holder of the Warrant.  The Board of Directors and Stockholders of the Corporation approved an
amendment to the Warrant and Warrant Agreement on July 6, 1992 and August 28, 1992, respectively, the effect of
which was to extend the purchase right for five (5) additional years.  The Board of Directors approved further
amendments to the Warrant and Warrant Agreement on September 8, 1997, the effect of which was to extend the
purchase rights for five (5) additional years.  The Board of Directors approved further amendments to the Warrant
and Warrant Agreement on August 30, 2002, and extended the purchase rights through September 21, 2007.
Specifically, Section 3 of the Warrant Agreement is hereby further amended to change the Termination Date from
September 21, 2002 to September 21, 2007, and the Warrant is hereby further amended to extend the expiration date
through and including September 21, 2007.

         The Warrant and Warrant Agreement are hereby specifically referred to and incorporated as a part hereof
and in all respects other than as specifically modified herein, the terms and conditions of the Warrant and the
Warrant Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.

         This Amendment Number Three is executed on this 20th day of September, 2002.


ATTEST:                                                         THE ST. LAWRENCE SEAWAY CORPORATION


/s/ Jack C. Brown                                               By:     /s/ Daniel L. Nir
------------------                                                 ---------------------------------
Jack C. Brown                                                      Daniel L. Nir
Secretary                                                          President and Treasurer

                                                                Accepted as of September 20, 2002

                                                                THE WINDWARD GROUP, LLC


                                                                By: /s/ Joel M. Greenblatt
                                                                   ---------------------------------
                                                                   Joel M. Greenblatt
                                                                   Its: Manager