### 78072 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 241 / Thursday, December 15, 2011 / Notices

Collection instrument Number of respondents Frequency of

response Average burden per

response (minutes) Estimated total
annual burden (hours)

SSA–1026–OCR–MS–SCE ............................................................................. 11,400 1 18 3,420 SSA–1026–OCR–SM–REDE .......................................................................... 225,000 1 18 67,500

Total .......................................................................................................... 236,400 ........ ................ ........................ 70,920

Dated: December 12, 2011.
Faye Lipsky,
Reports Clearance Officer, Center for Reports Clearance, Social Security Administration.

[FR Doc. 2011–32145 Filed 12–14–11; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4191–02–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF STATE**

**[Public Notice 7729]**

**Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) Request for Grant**  **Proposals (RFGP): International Sports Programming Initiative (ISPI)** 

Announcement Type: New Grant. Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/

PE/C/SU–12–15.

Catalog of Federal Domestic

Assistance Number: 19.415.

**DATES :**  Key Dates:

Application Deadline: Friday, February 3, 2012.

Executive Summary: The Office of Citizen Exchanges of the Bureau of

Educational and Cultural Affairs announces an open competition for the International Sports Programming Initiative. Public and private non-profit organizations meeting the provisions

described in Internal Revenue Code section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3) may submit proposals for projects designed to reach out to youth and promote mutual understanding by increasing the professional capacity of those who design and manage youth sports programs in select countries in Africa, East Asia and the Pacific, the Near East and North Africa, South and Central Asia, Europe, and the Western Hemisphere. The focus of all programs must be on reaching out to both male and female youth ages 7–17 and/or their coaches/administrators. Programs designed to train elite athletes or coaches will not be considered. Eligible countries and territories in each region

are:

Africa: Botswana, Cote d’Ivoire, Kenya, Mali, and Nigeria;

East Asia and the Pacific: China, Malaysia, or a multi-country program

that MUST include AT LEAST TWO of the following—Cambodia, Laos, Thailand, and/or Vietnam; Near East and North Africa: Egypt, Tunisia, or a program that MUST include both Israel and West Bank/Gaza;

South and Central Asia: Bangladesh, Nepal, Sri Lanka, and Turkmenistan;

Europe: Bosnia and Turkey; and the Western Hemisphere: Belize, Brazil, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, and Uruguay.

Proposals may address multiple countries, but all the countries must then be in the same region. Please see Section III.3. Other Eligibility Requirements for more information on eligibility requirements. Funding Under this Competition is pending the availability of FY 2012 funds.

I. Funding Opportunity Description

Authority: Overall grant making authority for this program is contained in the Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act of 1961, Public Law 87–256, as amended, also known as the Fulbright-Hays Act. The purpose of the Act is ‘‘to enable the

Government of the United States to increase mutual understanding between the people of the United States and the people of other countries * * *; to strengthen the ties which unite us with other nations by demonstrating the educational and cultural interests, developments, and achievements of the people of the United States and other nations * * * and thus to assist in the development of friendly, sympathetic and peaceful

relations between the United States and the other countries of the world.’’ The funding authority for the program above is provided through legislation.

Purpose: The Office of CitizenExchanges welcomes proposals for twoway exchanges (one component in the

United States and the other in the chosen country) that directly respond to

the thematic areas outlined below. Projects for themes not listed below will not be eligible for consideration under the FY 2012 International Sports Program Initiative Competition, and will be deemed technically ineligible and

receive no further consideration in the review process.

Themes:

(1) Youth Sports Engagement

Exchanges funded under this theme will focus on effective ways that sport can play a role in youth development at the grassroots level, while promoting technical proficiency among the youth sport coaches, sport administrators, and/or sport officials participating in the program. The role that sports can play in the long-term well-being of underserved youth should also be emphasized. Through exchanges between youth sport coaches, sport administrators, and/or sport officials, programs should encourage participants to share experiences in managing, organizing, and developing programs for youth sports activities with the aim of exposing young people to the ideas of teamwork and self-discipline that can lead to success in other aspects of their

lives.

(2) Sport and Health

Exchanges funded under this theme will focus on increasing awareness among young people of the importance of following a healthy lifestyle. Project goals should aim to avoid substance abuse, enhance physical fitness in order to prevent illness, and raise the overall quality of life through sports. Emphasis should be on the responsibility of the broader community to support healthy behaviors, and to educate young peoplehow to prevent and manage noncommunicable or infectious diseases, such as HIV/AIDS, through sports

programs.

(3) Sport and Disability

Exchanges funded under this theme are designed to promote and sponsor sport, recreation, and fitness programs for persons with disabilities. Project goals should include improving the quality of life for persons with disabilities by providing affordable, inclusive sports experiences that build self-esteem and confidence, enhancing active participation in community life, and making a significant contribution to the physical and psychological health of people with disabilities. Proposals

under this theme aim to demonstrate that persons with disabilities can be included in sports opportunities in their communities, and will develop opportunities for them to do so. In addition, projects should aim to raise the awareness of non-disabled people about contributions that persons with disabilities make to society.


### 78073 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 241 / Thursday, December 15, 2011 / Notices

(4) Sport for Social Change

Exchanges funded under this theme will focus on effective ways that sport can play a role in promoting more stable and inclusive communities, and as an

alternative to anti-social behavior. Project goals should include the importance of leadership, responsibility,teamwork, healthy living, and selfdiscipline to demonstrate how organized sports can encourage youth to stay in school, avoid substance abuse, prevent violence, and mitigate extremist voices. In addition, projects should aim to include the use of sport as a tool to promote tolerance and understanding through organized activities that appeal to youth and youth influencers, and that focus on conflict prevention/resolution.

The pursuit of academic degrees from U.S. institutions is not an acceptable focus of this program. Proposals that have only an academic focus will be deemed technically ineligible and will

receive no further consideration in the review process.

No guarantee is made or implied that grants will be awarded in all themes or

for all countries listed.

Audience: The intended audience is non-elite youth, coaches, community leaders, and non-governmental organizations.

Ideal Program Model: The following are suggested program structures:

• A U.S. grantee identifies U.S.citizens to conduct a multi-location, incountry program overseas that includes clinics and training sessions for: male and female athletes; government officials (Ministry of Sports and Ministry of Education); coaches (adult and youth); NGO representatives (including representatives from relevant sports federations); community officials (including local authorities associated with recreational facilities); youth audiences (equal numbers of boys and girls); and sports management professionals to support one of the

themes listed.

• An in-country partner overseas (a local university, government agency or other appropriate organization, such as a relevant sports federation) co-hosts an activity with the U.S. grantee institution, and participates in the selection of participants for a U.S.

program.

• A U.S. program that includes site visits designed to provide participants with exposure to American youth and coaches, sports education in the United States, background information on U.S. approaches to the themes listed in the announcement, relevant cultural activities, and a debriefing and

evaluation. • U.S. experts who worked with participants from overseas implement an in-country program.

• Participants in the U.S. program design in-country projects and serve as
co-presenters.

• Materials are translated into the relevant language for use in future projects.

• Small grants are dispersed for projects designed to expand the exchange experience.

• All participants are encouraged to

enroll in the Bureau of Education and

Cultural Affairs’ alumni Web site https://alumni.state.gov.

U.S. Embassy Involvement: Applicants are strongly encouraged to
consult with Public Affairs Officers at

U.S. Embassies in relevant countries as they develop proposals responding to this RFGP. It is important that the proposal narrative clearly state the applicant’s commitment to consult closely with the Public Affairs Section of the U.S. Embassy in the relevant country/countries to develop plans for project implementation, to select project participants, and to publicize the program through the media. Proposals should acknowledge U.S. Embassy

involvement in the final selection of all participants.

Media: Proposals should include specific strategies for publicizing the project, both in the United States and overseas, as applicable. Sample

materials can be included in the appendix. In any contact with the media (print, television, web, etc. ) applicants must acknowledge funding from the

Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs of the U.S. Department of State for the program. Prior to information being released to the media, the ECA Program Office(r) must approve the document. All grantees are required to submit photos, highlights, and/or media clips for posting on the ECA Web site: http://exchanges.state.gov/sports/.

Participant Selection: Proposals should clearly describe the types of persons that will participate in the program, as well as the participant recruitment and selection processes. It is a priority of the Bureau to include female participants in all of its programs. In the selection of foreign participants, the Bureau would like the U.S. Embassies (when possible) to be

involved in the recruitment and selection processes and the proposal should state how the grantee intends to incorporate this. The Bureau and U.S. Embassies retain the right to review all participant nominations and to accept or refuse participants recommended by grantee institutions. When U.S. participants are selected, grantee institutions must provide their names and biographical data to the ECA Program Officer. Priority in two-way exchange proposals will be given to foreign participants who have not previously traveled to the United States.

II. Award Information

Type of Award: Grant Agreement.
Fiscal Year Funds: 2012. Approximate Total Funding:
$1,800,000.

Approximate Number of Awards: 8–

10.

Approximate Average Award:
$225,000.

Ceiling of Award Range: $225,000. Floor of Award Range: $60,000. Anticipated Award Date: Pending availability of funds, August 31, 2012.

Anticipated Project Completion Date: September 30, 2013–June 30, 2015.

Projects under this competition may range in length from one to three years depending on the number of project components, the country/region targeted and the extent of the evaluation plan proposed by the applicant. The Office of Citizen Exchanges strongly encourages applicant organizations to plan enough time after project activities are completed to measure project outcomes. Please refer to the Program Monitoring and Evaluation section, item IV.3d.3 below, for further guidance on

evaluation.

III. Eligibility Information

III.1. Eligible applicants: Applications may be submitted by public and private non-profit organizations meeting the provisions described in Internal

Revenue Code section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3).

III.2. Cost Sharing or Matching Funds:

There is no minimum or maximum percentage required for this competition. However, the Bureau encourages applicants to provide maximum levels of cost sharing and funding in support of its programs.

When cost sharing is offered, it is understood and agreed that the applicant must provide the amount of cost sharing as stipulated in its proposal and later included in an approved agreement. Cost sharing may be in the

form of allowable direct or indirect costs. For accountability, you must maintain written records to support all costs which are claimed as your contribution, as well as costs to be paid by the Federal government. Such records are subject to audit. The basis for determining the value of cash and

in-kind contributions must be in accordance with OMB Circular A–110, (Revised), Subpart C.23—Cost Sharing and Matching. In the event you do not


### 78074 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 241 / Thursday, December 15, 2011 / Notices

provide the minimum amount of cost sharing as stipulated in the approved budget, ECA’s contribution will be reduced in like proportion.

III.3. Other Eligibility Requirements: (a.) Grants awarded to eligible organizations with less than four years of experience in conducting international exchange programs will be limited to $60,000. Organizations that only qualify for the $60,000 level may choose to conduct a one-way exchange, but must explain how the objectives of Americans interacting with foreign participants will still be achieved.

(b.) Technical Eligibility: It is imperative that all proposals follow the requirements outlined in the Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI) technical

format and instructions document. Additionally, all proposals must comply with the following or they will result in your proposal being declared technically ineligible and will not

receive further consideration in the review process:

• Applicants may not submit more than one (1) Proposal for this competition. Organizations that submit proposals that exceed these limits will result in having all of their proposals declared technically ineligible.

• Proposals for countries that are not designated in the RFGP, that address more than one region, or address themes outside of those listed in the RFGP, will be deemed technically ineligible.

• The Office of Citizen Exchanges does not support proposals limited to conferences or seminars (i.e., one- to fourteen-day programs with plenary sessions, main speakers, panels, and a passive audience). It will support conferences only when they are a small part of a larger project in duration that is receiving Bureau funding from this competition. No funding is available exclusively to send U.S. citizens to conferences or conference type seminars overseas; nor is funding available to support the attendance of foreign

nationals at conferences or at routine professional association meetings in the

United States.

• The Office of Citizen Exchanges does not support academic research, or faculty or student fellowships.

• If your organization is a private non-profit which has not received a grant or cooperative agreement from ECA in the past three years, or if your organization received non-profit status from the IRS within the past four years, you must submit the necessary documentation to verify non-profit

status as directed in the PSI document. Failure to do so will cause your proposal to be declared technically ineligible. • Printed applications shipped after the established deadlines are ineligible

for consideration under this competition.

• Electronic applications uploaded to the Grants.gov Web site after midnight of the application deadline date will be automatically rejected by the Grants.gov system, and will be technically ineligible.

IV. Application and Submission

Information

Before submitting a proposal, all applicants are strongly encouraged to consult with the Washington, DC-based Department of State contact for the themes/regions listed in this

solicitation.

Note: Please read the complete announcement before sending inquiries or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP deadline has passed, Bureau staff may not discuss this competition with applicants until the proposal review process has been completed.

IV.1 Contact Information to Request an Application Package: Please contact: Ryan Murphy, U.S. Department of State,

Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, SportsUnited Division, ECA/PE/ C/SU, SA–5, Floor 3, 2200 C Street, NW., Washington, DC 20037, tel: (202) 632–6058, fax: (202) 632–6492, MurphyRM@state.gov to request a Solicitation Package. Please refer to the Funding Opportunity Number ECA/PE/ C/SU–12–15 located at the top of this announcement when making your
request.

Alternatively, an electronic application package may be obtained

from http://www.grants.gov. Please see

section IV.3f for further information.

The Solicitation Package contains the Proposal Submission Instruction (PSI) document which consists of required application forms, and standard guidelines for proposal preparation.

Please specify Ryan Murphy and refer to the Funding Opportunity Number ECA/PE/C/SU–12–15 located at the top

of this announcement on all other inquiries and correspondence.

IV.2. To Download a Solicitation Package Via Internet: The entire Solicitation Package may be

downloaded from the Bureau’s Web site

at: http://exchanges.state.gov/grants/ open2.html, or from the Grants.gov Web

site at http://www.grants.gov

.

Please read all information before downloading.

IV.3. Content and Form of

Submission: Applicants must follow all instructions in the Solicitation Package. The application should be submitted per the instructions under IV.3f. ‘‘Application Deadline and Methods of

Submission’’ section below.

IV.3a. You are required to have a

Dun and Bradstreet Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number to apply for a grant or cooperative agreement from the U.S. Government. This number is a nine-digit identification number, which uniquely identifies business entities. Obtaining a DUNS number is easy and there is no charge. To obtain a DUNS number,

access http://

www.dunandbradstreet.com or call 1 (866) 705–5711. Please ensure that your

DUNS number is included in the appropriate box of the SF–424 which is part of the formal application package.

IV.3b. All proposals must contain an executive summary, proposal narrative, detailed timeline and detailed budget. Please Refer to the Solicitation Package. It contains the mandatory Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI) document for additional formatting and technical requirements.

IV.3c. You must have nonprofit status with the IRS at the time of application.

Please note: Effective January 7, 2009, all applicants for ECA federal assistance

awards must include in their application the names of directors and/ or senior executives (current officers, trustees, and key employees, regardless of amount of compensation). In fulfilling this requirement, applicants

must submit information in one of the following ways:

(1) Those who file Internal Revenue Service Form 990, ‘‘Return of Organization Exempt From Income Tax,’’ must include a copy of relevant portions of this form.

(2) Those who do not file IRS Form

990 must submit information above in

the format of their choice.

In addition to final program reporting requirements, award recipients will also be required to submit a one-page document, derived from their program reports, listing and describing their grant activities. For award recipients,

the names of directors and/or senior executives (current officers, trustees,and key employees), as well as the onepage description of grant activities, will be transmitted by the State Department to OMB, along with other information required by the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA), and will be made available to the public by the Office of Management and Budget on its USASpending.gov Web site as part of ECA’s FFATA reporting requirements.

If your organization is a private nonprofit which has not received a grant or cooperative agreement from ECA in the past three years, or if your organization


### 78075 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 241 / Thursday, December 15, 2011 / Notices

received non-profit status from the IRS within the past four years, you must submit the necessary documentation to verify non-profit status as directed in

the PSI document. Failure to do so will cause your proposal to be declared technically ineligible.

IV.3d. Please take into consideration the following information when preparing your proposal narrative:

IV.3d.1. Adherence to All Regulations Governing the J Visa

The Office of Citizen Exchanges of the

Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs is the official program sponsor of the exchange program covered by this RFGP, and an employee of the Bureau will be the ‘‘Responsible Officer’’ for the program under the terms of 22 CFR 62,

which covers the administration of the Exchange Visitor Program (J visa program). Under the terms of 22 CFR 62, organizations receiving awards (either a grant or cooperative agreement) under this RFGP will be third parties ‘‘cooperating with or assisting the sponsor in the conduct of the sponsor’s program.’’ The actions of recipient organizations shall be ‘‘imputed to the sponsor in evaluating the sponsor’s compliance with’’ 22 CFR part 62. Therefore, the Bureau expects that any organization receiving an award under this competition will render all assistance necessary to enable the Bureau to fully comply with 22 CFR
part 62 et seq.

The Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs places critically important emphases on the secure and proper administration of Exchange Visitor (J visa) Programs and adherence by recipient organizations and program participants to all regulations governing the J visa program status. Therefore, proposals should explicitly state in writing that the applicant is prepared to assist the Bureau in meeting all requirements governing the administration of Exchange Visitor Programs as set forth in 22 CFR part 62. If your organization has experience as a designated Exchange Visitor Program Sponsor, the applicant should discuss their record of compliance with 22 CFR

62 et seq., including the oversight of their Responsible Officers and Alternate Responsible Officers, screening and selection of program participants, provision of pre-arrival information and orientation to participants, monitoring of participants, proper maintenance and security of forms, record-keeping, reporting and other requirements.

The Office of Citizen Exchanges of ECA will be responsible for issuing DS– 2019 forms to participants in this

program. A copy of the complete regulations governing the administration of Exchange Visitor (J) programs is

available at http://exchanges.state.gov

or from: Office of Designation, Private Sector

Programs Division, U.S. Department of State, ECA/EC/D/PS, SA–5, 5th Floor, 2200 C Street NW, Washington,

DC 20037.

IV.3d.2. Diversity, Freedom and Democracy Guidelines

Pursuant to the Bureau’s authorizing legislation, programs must maintain a non-political character and should be balanced and representative of the diversity of American political, social, and cultural life. ‘‘Diversity’’ should be interpreted in the broadest sense and encompass differences including, but not limited to ethnicity, race, gender,religion, geographic location, socioeconomic status, and disabilities. Applicants are strongly encouraged to

adhere to the advancement of this principle both in program administration and in program content.

Please refer to the review criteria under the ‘Support for Diversity’ section for specific suggestions on incorporating diversity into your proposal. Public Law 104–319 provides that ‘‘in carrying out programs of educational and cultural exchange in countries whose people do not fully enjoy freedom and democracy,’’ the Bureau ‘‘shall take appropriate steps to provide opportunities for participation in such programs to human rights and democracy leaders of such countries.’’ Public Law 106–113 requires that the governments of the countries described above do not have inappropriate influence in the selection process. Proposals should reflect advancement of these goals in their program contents, to

the full extent deemed feasible.

IV.3d.3. Program Monitoring and

Evaluation

Proposals must include a plan to monitor and evaluate the project’s success, both as the activities unfold and at the end of the program. The Bureau recommends that your proposal include a draft survey questionnaire or other technique plus a description of a methodology to use to link outcomes to original project objectives. The Bureau expects that the recipient organization will track participants or partners and be able to respond to key evaluation questions, including satisfaction with the program, learning as a result of the program, changes in behavior as a result of the program, and effects of the program on institutions (institutions in which participants work or partner institutions). The evaluation plan

should include indicators that measure gains in mutual understanding as well as substantive knowledge.

Successful monitoring and evaluation depend heavily on setting clear goals and outcomes at the outset of a program. Your evaluation plan should include a description of your project’s objectives, your anticipated project outcomes, and how and when you intend to measure these outcomes (performance indicators). The more that outcomes are ‘‘smart’’ (specific, measurable, attainable, results-oriented, and placed in a reasonable time frame), the easier

it will be to conduct the evaluation. You should also show how your project objectives link to the goals of the program described in this RFGP.

Your monitoring and evaluation plan should clearly distinguish between

program outputs and outcomes

. Outputs are products and services delivered, often stated as an amount. Output information is important to show the scope or size of project activities, but it

cannot substitute for information about progress towards outcomes or the results achieved. Examples of outputs include the number of people trained or

the number of seminars conducted.
Outcomes, in contrast, represent specific results a project is intended to achieve and is usually measured as an extent of change. Findings on outputs and outcomes should both be reported,

but the focus should be on outcomes.

We encourage you to assess the following four levels of outcomes, as they relate to the program goals set out in the RFGP (listed here in increasing order of importance):

1. Participant satisfaction with the program and exchange experience.

2. Participant learning, such as increased knowledge, aptitude, skills, and changed understanding and attitude. Learning includes both substantive (subject-specific) learning and mutual understanding.

3. Participant behavior, concrete actions to apply knowledge in work or community; greater participation and responsibility in civic organizations; interpretation and explanation of experiences and new knowledge gained;

continued contacts between participants, community members, and

others.

4. Institutional changes, such as

increased collaboration and partnerships, policy reforms, new programming, and organizational improvements.

Please note: Consideration should be given to the appropriate timing of data collection for each level of outcome. For example,satisfaction is usually captured as a shortVerDate Mar<15>2010 16:49 Dec 14, 2011 Jkt 226001 PO 00000 Frm 00113 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\15DEN1.SGM 15DEN1mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

### 78076 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 241 / Thursday, December 15, 2011 / Notices

term outcome, whereas behavior and institutional changes are normally considered longer-term outcomes. Overall, the quality of your monitoring and evaluation plan will be judged on how well it: (1) Specifies intended outcomes; (2) gives clear descriptions of how each outcome will be measured; (3) identifies when particular outcomes will be measured; and (4) provides a clear description of the data collection strategies for each outcome (i.e., surveys, interviews, or focus groups). (Please note that evaluation plans that deal only with the first level of outcomes [satisfaction] will be deemed less competitive under the present evaluation criteria).

Recipient organizations will be required to provide reports analyzing their evaluation findings to the Bureau in their regular program reports. All data collected, including survey responses and contact information, must

be maintained for a minimum of three years and provided to the Bureau upon
request.

Department of State Acknowledgement

All recipients of ECA grants or cooperative agreements should be prepared to state in any announcement or publicity where it is not inappropriate that activities are assisted financially by the Bureau of Educational

and Cultural Affairs of the U.S. Department of State under the authority of the Fulbright-Hays Act of 1961, as

amended.

In any contact with the media (print, television, web, etc. ) applicants must acknowledge funding from the Bureau

of Educational and Cultural Affairs of the U.S. Department of State for the program. Prior to information being released to the media, the ECA Program Office(r) must approve the document.

Alumni Outreach/Follow-on Programming and Engagement

Please refer to the Proposal Submissions Instruction (PSI) document for additional guidance.

IV.3e. Please take the following

information into consideration when preparing your budget:

IV.3e.1. Applicants must submit SF–424A—‘‘Budget Information—NonConstruction Programs’’ along with a comprehensive budget for the entire program. For this competition, requests should not exceed $225,000. There must be a summary budget as well as breakdowns reflecting both administrative and program budgets.Applicants may provide separate subbudgets for each program component, phase, location, or activity to provide

clarification. Please note that the Bureau

of Educational and Cultural Affairs does not fund programs that involve building of structures of any kind, including playing fields, recreation centers, or

stadiums.

IV.3e.2. Allowable costs for the program include the following:

1. Travel. International and domestic airfare; visas; transit costs; ground transportation costs. Please note that all air travel must be in compliance with the Fly America Act. There is no charge for J–1 visas for participants in Bureau sponsored programs.

2. Per Diem. For U.S.-based programming, organizations should use the published Federal per diem rates for individual U.S. cities. Domestic per diem rates may be accessed at: http:// www.gsa.gov/perdiem. ECA requests applicants to budget realistic costs that reflect the local economy and do not exceed Federal per diem rates. Foreign per diem rates can be accessed at: http://aoprals.state.gov/ content.asp?content

_id=184&menu

_ id=78.

3. Interpreters. For U.S.-based activities, ECA strongly encourages applicants to hire their own locally based interpreters. One interpreter is typically needed for every four participants who require interpretation. When an applicant proposes to use interpreters, the following expenses should be included in the budget: Published Federal per diem rates (both ‘‘lodging’’ and ‘‘M&IE’’) and transportation costs per interpreter. Bureau funds cannot support interpreters who accompany delegations from their home country or travel internationally.

4. Book and Cultural Allowances. Foreign participants are entitled to a one-time cultural allowance of $150 per person, plus a book allowance of $50. Interpreters should be reimbursed up to $150 for expenses when they escort participants to cultural events. U.S. program staff, trainers or participants are not eligible to receive these benefits.

5. Consultants. Consultants may be used to provide specialized expertise or to make presentations. Honoraria rates should not exceed $250 per day.Organizations are encouraged to costshare rates that would exceed that figure. Subcontracting organizations may also be employed, in which case the written agreement between the prospective grantee and sub-grantee should be included in the proposal. Such sub-grants should detail the division of responsibilities and proposed costs, and subcontracts should be itemized in the budget.

6. Room Rental. The rental of meeting space should not exceed $250 per day. Any rates that exceed this amount

should be cost shared. 7. Materials. Proposals may contain costs to purchase, develop and translate materials for participants. Costs for high quality translation of materials should be anticipated and included in the budget. Grantee organizations should expect to submit a copy of all program materials to ECA, and ECA support should be acknowledged on all materials developed with its funding.

8. Equipment. Applicants may propose to use grant funds to purchase equipment, such as computers and printers; these costs should be justified in the budget narrative. Costs for

furniture are not allowed.

9. Working Meal. A maximum of one working meal may be authorized per project unless extenuating circumstances exist, in which case prior approval must be obtained from a DOS

Grants Officer. Unless additional working meals are approved, the Recipient agrees to reduce the participants’ per diem to cover the cost of any additional working meals. In addition, per capita costs may not exceed $45 excluding room rental. The number of invited guests shall not exceed participants by more than a

factor of two-to-one.

10. Return Travel Allowance. A return travel allowance of $70 for each foreign participant may be included in the budget. This allowance would cover incidental expenses incurred during

international travel.

11. Health Insurance. Foreign participants will be covered during their participation in the U.S. program by the ECA-sponsored Accident and Sickness Program for Exchanges (ASPE). The grantee must notify the program office to enroll them. Details of that policy can be provided by the contact officers

identified in this solicitation. The premium is paid by ECA and should not be included in the grant proposal budget. However, applicants are permitted to include costs for travel insurance for U.S. participants in the budget.

12. Wire Transfer Fees. When necessary, applicants may include costs to transfer funds to partner organizations overseas. Grantees are urged to research applicable taxes that may be imposed on these transfers by host governments.

13. In-country Travel Costs for Visa Processing Purposes. Given the requirements associated with obtaining J–1 visas for ECA-supported participants, applicants should include costs for any travel associated with visa interviews or DS–2019 pick-up.

14. Administrative Costs. Costs necessary for the effective administration of the program may


### 78077 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 241 / Thursday, December 15, 2011 / Notices

include salaries for grantee organization employees, benefits, and other direct and indirect costs per detailed instructions in the Application Package. While there is no rigid ratio of administrative to program costs, proposals in which the administrative
costs do not exceed 25% of the total requested ECA grant funds will be more competitive under the cost effectiveness and cost sharing criterion, per item V.1 below. Proposals should show strong administrative cost sharingcontributions from the applicant, the incountry partner and other sources.

Please refer to the Solicitation Package for complete budget guidelines and formatting instructions.

IV.3f. Application Deadline and

Methods of Submission:

Application Deadline Date: Friday, February 3, 2012.

Reference Number: ECA/PE/C/SU–

12–15.

Methods of Submission: Applications may be submitted in one of two ways:

(1) In hard-copy, via a nationally recognized overnight delivery service (i.e., DHL, Federal Express, UPS, Airborne Express, or U.S. Postal Service Express Overnight Mail, etc.), or

(2) Electronically through http://
www.grants.gov.

Along with the Project Title, all applicants must enter the above

Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF– 424 contained in the mandatory Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI)

of the solicitation document.

IV.3f.1. Submitting Printed Applications

Applications must be shipped no later than the above deadline. Delivery services used by applicants must have in-place, centralized shipping identification and tracking systems that may be accessed via the Internet and delivery people who are identifiable by commonly recognized uniforms and delivery vehicles. Proposals shipped on

or before the above deadline but received at ECA more than seven days after the deadline will be ineligible for

further consideration under this competition. Proposals shipped after the established deadlines are ineligible for consideration under this competition.

ECA will not notify you upon receipt of application. It is each applicant’s responsibility to ensure that each package is marked with a legible tracking number and to monitor/confirm delivery to ECA via the Internet. Delivery of proposal packages may not
be made via local courier service or in person for this competition. Faxed documents will not be accepted at any time. Only proposals submitted as

stated above will be considered. Important note: When preparing your submission please make sure to include one extra copy of the completed SF–424 form and place it in an envelope addressed to ‘‘ECA/

EX/PM’’.

The original and eight (8) copies of the application should be sent to:
U.S. Department of State, Program

Management Division, ECA–IIP/EX/ PM, Ref.: ECA/PE/C/SU–12–15, SA–5, Floor 4, Department of State, 2200 C Street NW., Washington, DC 20037. Applicants submitting hard-copy applications must also submit the ‘‘Executive Summary’’ and ‘‘Proposal Narrative’’ sections of the proposal in text (.txt) or Microsoft Word format on CD–ROM. The Bureau will provide these files electronically to the appropriate Public Affairs Section(s) at the U.S. Embassy/ies for their review.

IV.3f.2. Submitting Electronic Applications

Applicants have the option of submitting proposals electronically through Grants.gov (http://
www.grants.gov ). Complete solicitation packages are available at Grants.gov in the ‘‘Find’’ portion of the system.

Please follow the instructions available in the ‘‘Get Started’’ portion of the site (http://www.grants.gov/

GetStarted).

Several of the steps in the Grants.gov registration process could take several weeks. Therefore, applicants should check with appropriate staff within their organizations immediately after reviewing this RFGP to confirm or determine their registration status with Grants.gov.

Once registered, the amount of time it can take to upload an application will vary depending on a variety of factors including the size of the application and the speed of your internet connection. In addition, validation of an electronic submission via Grants.gov can take up to two business days.

Therefore, we strongly recommend that you not wait until the application deadline to begin the submission process through Grants.gov.

The Grants.gov Web site includes extensive information on all phases/ aspects of the Grants.gov process, including an extensive section on frequently asked questions, located under the ‘‘For Applicants’’ section of the Web site. ECA strongly recommends that all potential applicants review thoroughly the Grants.gov Web site, well in advance of submitting a proposal through the Grants.gov system. ECA bears no responsibility for data errors resulting from transmission or conversion processes. Direct all questions regarding Grants.gov registration and submission

to: Grants.gov Customer Support

Contact Center Phone: (800) 518–

4726,

Business Hours: Monday–Friday, 7 a.m.–9 p.m. Eastern Time

Email: support@grants.gov. Applicants have until midnight (12 a.m.), Washington, DC time of the closing date to ensure that their entire application has been uploaded to the Grants.gov site. There are no exceptions to the above deadline. Applications uploaded to the site after midnight of the application deadline date will be automatically rejected by the Grants.gov system, and will be technically ineligible. Please refer to the Grants.gov

Web site for definitions of various ‘‘application statuses’’ and the difference between a submission receipt

and a submission validation.

Applicants will receive a validation email from grants.gov upon the successful submission of an application. Again, validation of an electronic submission via Grants.gov can take up to two business days . Therefore, we strongly recommend that you not wait until the application deadline to begin the submission process through Grants.gov. ECA will not notify you upon receipt of electronic applications.

It is the responsibility of all applicants submitting proposals via the Grants.gov Web portal to ensure that proposals have been received by Grants.gov in their entirety, and ECA bears no responsibility for data errors resulting from transmission or conversion processes.

IV.3g. Intergovernmental Review of Applications: Executive Order 12372 does not apply to this program.

V. Application Review Information

V.1. Review Process

The Bureau will review all proposals for technical eligibility. Proposals will be deemed ineligible if they do not fully adhere to the guidelines stated herein and in the Solicitation Package. All eligible proposals will be reviewed by the program office, as well as the Public Diplomacy section of the relevant Embassy, where appropriate. Eligible proposals will be subject to compliance with Federal and Bureau regulations and guidelines and forwarded to Bureau grant panels for advisory review. Proposals may also be reviewed by the Office of the Legal Adviser or by other Department elements. Final funding

decisions are at the discretion of the Department of State’s Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural


### 78078 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 241 / Thursday, December 15, 2011 / Notices

Affairs. Final technical authority for grants resides with the Bureau’s Grants

Officer.

Review Criteria

Technically eligible applications will be competitively reviewed according to

the criteria stated below. These criteria are not rank ordered and all carry equal weight in the proposal evaluation:

1. Program Planning and Ability to Achieve Objectives: Program objectives should be stated clearly and should reflect the applicant’s expertise in the subject area and region. Objectives should respond to the topics in this

announcement and should relate to the current conditions in the target country/ countries. A detailed agenda and relevant work plan should explain how objectives will be achieved and should include a timetable for completion of major tasks. The substance of workshops, internships, seminars and/ or consulting should be described in detail. Sample training schedules should be outlined. Responsibilities of proposed in-country partners should be clearly described. A discussion of how the applicant intends to address language issues should be included, if

needed.

2. Multiplier Effect/Impact: Proposed programs should strengthen long-term mutual understanding, including maximum sharing of information and establishment of long-term institutional and individual linkages.

3 . Institutional Capacity: Proposals should include: (1) The institution’s mission and date of establishment; (2)detailed information about proposed incountry partner(s) and the history of the partnership; (3) an outline of prior awards—U.S. government and/or private support received for the target theme/country/region; and (4) descriptions of experienced staff members who will implement the program. The proposal should reflect the institution’s expertise in the subject area and knowledge of the conditions in the target country/countries. Proposals

should demonstrate an institutional record of successful exchange programs, including responsible fiscal management and full compliance with all reporting requirements for past Bureau grants as determined by Bureau grants staff. The Bureau will consider the past performance of prior recipients and the demonstrated potential of new applicants. Proposed personnel and

institutional resources should be adequate and appropriate to achieve the program’s goals. The Bureau strongly encourages applicants to submit letters of support from proposed in-country
partners. 4. Cost Effectiveness and Cost Sharing: Overhead and administrative costs in the proposal budget, including salaries, honoraria and subcontracts for services, should be kept to a minimum. Proposals whose administrative costs are less than twenty-five (25) percent of the total funds requested from the

Bureau will be deemed more competitive under this criterion. Applicants are strongly encouraged to cost share a portion of overhead and administrative expenses. Cost sharing, including contributions from the applicant, proposed in-country partner(s), and other sources should be included in the budget request. Proposal budgets that do not reflect cost sharing will be deemed not competitive in this
category.

5. Support of Diversity: Proposals should demonstrate substantive support of the Bureau’s policy on diversity.

Achievable and relevant features should be cited in both program administration (selection of participants, program venue and program evaluation) andprogram content (orientation and wrapup sessions, program meetings, resource materials and follow-up activities). Applicants should refer to the Bureau’s Diversity, Freedom and Democracy Guidelines in the PSI and the Diversity, Freedom and Democracy Guidelines section, Item IV.3d.2, above for additional guidance.

6. Post-Grant Activities: Applicants should provide a plan to conduct

activities after the Bureau-funded project has concluded in order to ensure that Bureau-supported programs are not isolated events. Funds for all post-grant

activities must be in the form of contributions from the applicant or

sources outside of the Bureau. Costs for these activities must not appear in the proposal budget, but should be outlined

in the narrative.

7. Program Monitoring and

Evaluation: Proposals should include a detailed plan to monitor and evaluate the program. Program objectives should target clearly defined results in quantitative terms. Competitive evaluation plans will describe how applicant organizations would measure these results, and proposals should

include draft data collection instruments (surveys, questionnaires, etc.) in Tab E. See the ‘‘Program Monitoring/Evaluation’’ section, item

IV.3d.3 above for more information on the components of a competitive evaluation plan. Successful applicants (grantee institutions) will be expected to submit a report after each program component concludes or on a quarterly basis, whichever is less frequent. The Bureau also requires that grantee institutions submit a final narrative and financial report no more than 90 days after the expiration of a grant. Please refer to the ‘‘Program Management/ Evaluation’’ section, item IV.3d.3 above for more guidance.

VI. Award Administration Information

VI.1a. Award Notices

Final awards cannot be made until funds have been appropriated by Congress, allocated and committed through internal Bureau procedures. Successful applicants will receive a Federal Assistance Award (FAA) from

the Bureau’s Grants Office. The FAA and the original proposal with subsequent modifications (if applicable) shall be the only binding authorizing document between the recipient and the

U.S. Government. The FAA will be signed by an authorized Grants Officer, and mailed to the recipient’s responsible officer identified in the application.

Unsuccessful applicants will receive

notification of the results of the application review from the ECA program office coordinating this competition.

For assistance awards involving the Palestinian Authority, West Bank, and

Gaza: All awards made under this competition must be executed according to all relevant U.S. laws and policies regarding assistance to the Palestinian Authority, and to the West Bank and Gaza. Organizations must consult with

relevant Public Affairs Offices before entering into any formal arrangements or agreements with Palestinian organizations or institutions.

Note: To assure that planning for the inclusion of the Palestinian Authority complies with requirements, please contact (Ryan Murphy, ECA/PE/C/SU, tel: (202) 632–

6058, MurphyRM@state.gov) for additional

information.

VI.2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements: Terms and

Conditions for the Administration of ECA agreements include the following:
Office of Management and Budget

Circular A–122, ‘‘Cost Principles for Nonprofit Organizations.’’ Office of Management and Budget

Circular A–21, ‘‘Cost Principles for

Educational Institutions.’’ OMB Circular A–87, ‘‘Cost Principles

for State, Local and Indian

Governments’’. OMB Circular No. A–110 (Revised),

Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Agreements with Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals, and other Nonprofit Organizations.


### 78079 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 241 / Thursday, December 15, 2011 / Notices

OMB Circular No. A–102, Uniform

Administrative Requirements for

Grants-in-Aid to State and Local

Governments. OMB Circular No. A–133, Audits of

States, Local Government, and Nonprofit Organizations. Please reference the following Web

sites for additional information: http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants. http://fa.statebuy.state.gov

VI.3. Reporting Requirements: You must provide ECA with a hard copy original plus two copies of the following
reports:

(1.) A final program and financial report no more than 90 days after the expiration of the award;

(2.) A concise, one-page final program report summarizing program outcomes no more than 90 days after the expiration of the award. This one-page report will be transmitted to OMB, and be made available to the public via OMB’s USAspending.gov Web site—as part of ECA’s Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) reporting requirements.

(3.) A SF–PPR, ‘‘Performance Progress Report’’ Cover Sheet with all program
reports.

(4.) Quarterly program and financial reports which should include the activities completed during that quarter, information about any participants of the activities, and any adjustments in the program timeline.

Award recipients will be required to provide reports analyzing their evaluation findings to the Bureau in their regular program reports. (Please refer to IV. Application and Submission Instructions (IV.3.d.3) above for Program Monitoring and Evaluation information.

All data collected, including survey responses and contact information, must

be maintained for a minimum of three years and provided to the Bureau upon
request.

All reports must be sent to the ECA Grants Officer and ECA Program Officer

listed in the final assistance award

document.

Program Data Requirements: Award recipients will be required to maintain specific data on program participants and activities in an electronically accessible database format

that can be shared with the Bureau as required. As a minimum, the data must include the following:

(1) Name, address, contact information and biographic sketch of all persons who travel internationally on funds provided by the agreement or who benefit from the award funding but do

not travel.

(2) Itineraries of international and domestic travel, providing dates of travel and cities in which any exchange experiences take place. Final schedules for in-country and U.S. activities must be received by the ECA Program Officer at least three weeks prior to the official opening of the activity.

VII. Agency Contacts

For questions about this announcement, contact: Ryan Murphy, U.S. Department of State, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, SportsUnited Division, ECA/PE/C/SU, SA–5, Floor 3, 2200 C Street NW., Washington, DC 20037, tel: (202) 632– 6058, fax: (202) 632–6492, MurphyRM@state.gov.

All correspondence with the Bureau concerning this RFGP should reference

the above title and reference number

ECA/PE/C/SU–12–15.

Please read the complete announcement before sending inquiries or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP deadline has passed, Bureau staff may not discuss this competition with applicants until the proposal review process has been completed.

VIII. Other Information

Notice

The terms and conditions published in this RFGP are binding and may not be modified by any Bureau representative. Explanatory information provided by the Bureau that contradicts published language will not be binding.

Issuance of the RFGP does not

constitute an award commitment on the part of the Government. The Bureau reserves the right to reduce, revise, or increase proposal budgets in accordance with the needs of the program and the availability of funds. Awards made will be subject to periodic reporting and evaluation requirements per section VI.3

above.

Dated: December 8, 2011.

J. Adam Ereli,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, U.S. Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2011–32105 Filed 12–14–11; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4710–05–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF STATE**

**[Public Notice 7712]**

**Overseas Schools Advisory Council Notice of Meeting** 

The Overseas Schools Advisory Council, Department of State, will hold its Executive Committee Meeting on Thursday, January 19, 2012, at 9:30 a.m. in Conference Room 1107, Department of State Building, 2201 C Street NW., Washington, DC. The meeting is open to the public and will last until approximately 12 p.m.

The Overseas Schools Advisory Council works closely with the U.S. business community in improving those American-sponsored schools overseas that are assisted by the Department of State and attended by dependents of

U.S. Government families and children of employees of U.S. corporations and

foundations abroad.

This meeting will deal with issues related to the work and the support provided by the Overseas SchoolsAdvisory Council to the Americansponsored overseas schools. In addition there will be a presentation on a Council-sponsored project that developed a training center for principals of overseas schools.

Members of the public may attend the meeting and join in the discussion, subject to the instructions of the Chair. Admittance of public members will be limited to the seating available. Access to the State Department is controlled, and individual building passes are required for all attendees. Persons who plan to attend should advise the office of Dr. Keith D. Miller, Department of State, Office of Overseas Schools, Room H328, SA–1, Washington, DC 20522– 0132, telephone (202) 261–8200, prior to January 9, 2012. Each visitor will be asked to provide his/her date of birth and either driver’s license or passport number at the time of registration and attendance, and must carry a valid photo ID to the meeting.

Personal data is requested pursuant to Public Law 99–399 (Omnibus Diplomatic Security and Antiterrorism Act of 1986), as amended; Public Law 107–56 (USA PATRIOT Act); and Executive Order 13356. The purpose of the collection is to validate the identity of individuals who enter Department

facilities. The data will be entered into the Visitor Access Control System (VACS–D) database. Please see the Privacy Impact Assessment for VACS–D

at: http://www.state.gov/documents/ organization/100305.pdf for additional

information.

Any requests for reasonable

accommodation should be made at the time of registration. All such requests will be considered, however, requests made after January 10th might not be possible to fill. All attendees must use the C Street entrance to the building.

Dated: December 9, 2011.

Keith D. Miller,
Executive Secretary, Overseas Schools Advisory Council.

[FR Doc. 2011–32187 Filed 12–14–11; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4710–24–P**