**FORM A -1** 

**PA RENT COMPA**  **NY INFORMA TION** 
**I. Parent Company / Legal Corporate Owner Information**
1. Legal Parent Company/ Legal Corporate Name Johns Manville 2. Address 717 17th Street 3. City Denver 4. State Colorado 5. Zip Code 80202 6. County Denver
7. Size of Company (approximate number of employ ees including all subsidiaries, branches, and related establishments owned): 6,491 (end of 2009)



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0004.xls**FORM A -2** 

**FA CILITY INFORMA** 

**TION**
**II. Facility Information**
Facility Name Johns Manville Facility Address Street 713 Bankhead Hwy City Wi nder State GA Zip Code 30680 County Barrow Facility Coordinates Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) 33.991711 Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) -83.77145 Specific location represented (e.g., front door of main building, centroid of property , etc.) Entrance roadway to Facility
Number of employees attached to the wool fiberglass manufacturing facility : See CBI submittal
Design capacity

of the plant (tons/y r) See CBI submittal
Ty pe(s) of process(es) (rotary spin, flame attenuation) at this plant Rotary Spin
Operation schedule hrs/day 24 days/y r 365
Identify what state and local air pollution rules and regulations, including permit requirements, your plant is subject to. (Please provide copies of permit(s) and permit IDs) Georgia Title V permit no. 3296-013-0005-V-02-0 (See Attachment A)

**III. Technical Contact**

Name Patti Blevins Technical Contact Title EHS Manager Telephone 770-867-0347 Facsimile (Fax) 770-867-0344 Email blevinsp@jm.com



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0004.xls**IV. Other**

Is the facility

a major source of HAP? No
If No, did the facility take a limit of its potential HAP emissions to avoid classification as a major source: No, true minor
Does the facility

manufacture other products in addition to wool fiberglass? No
If Yes, list the other products manufactured at the facility

. N/A
Are there any

HAP em issions associated with any co-located facilities? List unit operations, e.g., boiler, and pollutant/emissions. N/A



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0004.xls**FORM B-1**

**PLA NT OPERA** 

**TIONS**
**I. Overview of Plant Operations**
Number of process lines. Include lines that are currently operational or that are temporarily shutdown. (Do not include lines permanently shutdown). 2
For each process line: Process Line 1 Process Line 2 Process Line 3 Process line identification names or numbers Line 105 Line 106
Ty pe of process line (e.g., rotary spin, flame attenuation) Rotary spin Rotary spin Maximum annual production rate (tons/y r) See CBI submittal See CBI submittal Age of process equipment (y rs) 33 10
Remaining economic life of process line (y rs) Indefinite (due to rebuild capabilities) Indefinite (due to rebuild capabilities) List of products produced and most recent annual production (tons/y r; specify year) for each product See CBI submittal See CBI submittal
Please attach detailed schematics of each process line. See CBI submittal See CBI submittal



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0004.xls**FORM B-2**

**PLA NT OPERA** 

**TIONS**
**II. Process - Raw materials Handling and Storage**
Molten glass preparation Raw m aterials and proportions by wt (%) See CBI submittal Method(s) of convey ing each raw material to furnace/pots Pneum atic Binder and Additives List each raw material, including premixed materials, in the binder formulation and its proportion by wt (%) See CBI submittal List steps in preparing binder, including storage temperature ( ° F) and holding tim e (hrs) See CBI submittal Total yearly

consumption of binder (gal/y r) See CBI submittal Cost of binder ($/gal) for most recent year (specify year) See CBI submittal
Are binder storage and mixing tanks vented to outside/inside? Inside Method of treating vent air from storage and mix tanks None Emission control during liquid raw material transfer from vehicles to storage tanks. None Describe future source reduction plans and schedules to reformulate binders; List each constituent, proportions wt (%), cost ($/gal) for reformulation See CBI submittal



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0004.xls**FORM B-3**

**PLA NT OPERA** 

**TIONS**
**III. Process - Glass Melting Furnace**
For each Glass Melting Furnace: Furnace 1 Furnace 2 Process unit identification name/number 531E, 532E, 533E 631E Process line(s) served (identification name/number) Line 105 Line 106 Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) 33.991162 33.990903 Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) -83.771822 -83.771684 Stack or vent height (units) 110 110 Stack or vent diameter (units) 3.5 4.5 Manufacturer and model JM Proprietary JM Proprietary Date of original installation Sept 21, 1982 2000

Estimate of remaining lifetime (y rs) Indefinite (due to continued
ma intenance) Indefinite (due to continued
ma intenance) Major rebuilds:

W hat constitues a major rebuild JM is not familiar with the term "major rebuild." JM conducts periodic routine
ma intenace. JM is not familiar with

the term "major rebuild." JM conducts periodic routine
ma intenace. Frequency

of a major rebuild N/A N/A Cost of ty pical major rebuild N/A N/A Date of last major rebuild N/A N/A Purpose of last major rebuild N/A N/A Increase or decrease in emissions N/A N/A Fuel ty pe: electric, gas, or oil Electric Electric Fuel consumption rate (KW /ton of glass or Btu/ton of glass) See CBI submittal See CBI submittal
List HAPs that are in refractory material Chromium compounds Chromium compounds Design production rate (tons/day ) See CBI submittal See CBI submittal Actual glass pull rate (tons/day ) See CBI submittal See CBI submittal
Vent gas flow rate (acfm @ ° F) 32,800 acfm @ 68 °F 50,000 acfm @ 68 °F



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0004.xlsTemperature ( ° F) of molten glass in furnace and

forehearth (if applicable) See CBI submittal See CBI submittal Nature and frequency of routine/preventive maintenance procedures See CBI submittal See CBI submittal Describe process modification(s) since 1999 that reduce
em issions None None

Describe future source reduction plans and schedules See CBI submittal See CBI submittal



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0004.xls**FORM B-4**

**PLA NT OPERA** 

**TIONS**
**IV. Process - Forming -- Rotary Spin / Flame A ttenuation** 
For each Forming Operation -- Rotary Spin/Flame Attenuation Process unit identification name/number 541 542 543 Process line(s) served (identification name/number) Line 105-Module 1 Line 105-Module 2 Line 105-Module 3 Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) 33.991459 33.991351 33.991243 Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) -83.771821 -83.771817 -83.771814 Stack or vent height (ft) 110 110 110 Stack or vent diameter (ft) 5 4 4 Number of fiber forming devices (spinners) per line. Method of attenuating fiber (e.g., air, flame, or air and flame). Indicate ty pe of burner used (if flame). Is there a forehearth between the furnace and the forming section? Major rebuilds:

W hat constitues a major rebuild JM is not familiar with the term "major rebuild." JM conducts periodic routine
ma intenace. JM is not familiar with the

term "major rebuild." JM conducts periodic routine
ma intenace. JM is not familiar with the

term "major rebuild." JM conducts periodic routine
ma intenace. Frequency

of a major rebuild N/A N/A N/A Cost of ty pical major rebuild N/A N/A N/A Date of last major rebuild N/A N/A N/A Purpose of last major rebuild N/A N/A N/A Increase or decrease in emissions N/A N/A N/A If modular, number of modules and plenums
Presence of water overspray and application rate (gpm) See CBI submittal See CBI submittal See CBI submittal
Binder applied and application rate (gpm) CBI See CBI submittal See CBI submittal See CBI submittal Other material applied and application rate (gpm) Temperature of glass fiber when binder is applied (°F) See CBI submittal See CBI submittal See CBI submittal Temperature of binder when applied to fibers (°F) See CBI submittal See CBI submittal See CBI submittal
Method of evenly

distributing fibers onto forming converyor See CBI submittal See CBI submittal See CBI submittal
Formed mat thickness (in.) See CBI submittal See CBI submittal See CBI submittal Forming Operation 1

See CBI submittal

Air

3 No

None



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0004.xlsForming air flow rate (acfm @ °F)

Percent of forming air recirculated and percent exhausted

Nature and frequency of routine/preventive maintenance procedures-CBI See CBI submittal See CBI submittal See CBI submittal

Describe process modification(s) since 1999 that reduce
em issions Describe future source reduction plans and schedules See CBI submittal See CBI submittal See CBI submittal 100% exhausted

The binder for all plant products was converted to a non-HAP binder in 2002 that significantly

reduces or eliminates HAP emissions from the manufacturing

process. < 190,000 acfm @ 137 °F



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0004.xls**FORM B-4**

**PLA NT OPERA** 

**TIONS**
**IV. Process - Forming -- Rotary Spin / Flame A ttenuation** 
For each Forming Operation -- Rotary Spin/Flame Attenuation Process unit identification name/number Process line(s) served (identification name/number) Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Stack or vent height (ft) Stack or vent diameter (ft) Number of fiber forming devices (spinners) per line. Method of attenuating fiber (e.g., air, flame, or air and flame). Indicate ty pe of burner used (if flame). Is there a forehearth between the furnace and the forming section? Major rebuilds:

W hat constitues a major rebuild Frequency

of a major rebuild Cost of ty pical major rebuild Date of last major rebuild Purpose of last major rebuild Increase or decrease in emissions If modular, number of modules and plenums
Presence of water overspray and application rate (gpm)
Binder applied and application rate (gpm) CBI Other material applied and application rate (gpm) Temperature of glass fiber when binder is applied (°F) Temperature of binder when applied to fibers (°F)
Method of evenly

distributing fibers onto forming converyor Formed mat thickness (in.) 641-642 643-644 Line 106-Module 4 Line 106-Module 5 33.991585 33.991342 -83.771424 -83.771417 110 110 8 8

JM is not familiar with the term "major rebuild." JM conducts periodic routine
ma intenace. JM is not familiar with the

term "major rebuild." JM conducts periodic routine
ma intenace.
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

See CBI submittal See CBI submittal

See CBI submittal See CBI submittal

See CBI submittal See CBI submittal See CBI submittal See CBI submittal

See CBI submittal See CBI submittal

See CBI submittal See CBI submittal

Forming Operation 2

See CBI submittal

Air

2 Yes

None



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0004.xlsForming air flow rate (acfm @ °F)

Percent of forming air recirculated and percent exhausted

Nature and frequency of routine/preventive maintenance procedures-CBI

Describe process modification(s) since 1999 that reduce
em issions Describe future source reduction plans and schedules See CBI submittal See CBI submittal

See CBI submittal See CBI submittal

100% exhausted

The binder for all plant products was converted to a non-HAP binder in 2002 that significantly reduces or elim inates HAP emissions from the manufacturing

process. 150,000 acfm per module



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0004.xls**FORM B-5**

**PLA NT OPERA** 

**TIONS**
**V. Process - Curing**

For each Curing Oven: Curing Oven 1 Curing Oven 2 Process unit identification name/number 554 654
Process line(s) served (identification name/number) Line 105 Line 106 Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) 33.991853 33.991970 Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) -83.77192 -83.771567 Stack or vent height (ft) 110 110 Stack or vent diameter (ft) 4 4 Method of curing Thermal Thermal Manufacturer and model Johns Manville KCI Date of original installation 1977 2000 Major rebuilds:

W hat constitues a major rebuild JM is not familiar with the term "major rebuild." JM conducts periodic routine
ma intenace. JM is not familiar with the term "major rebuild." JM conducts periodic routine
ma intenace. Frequency

of a major rebuild N/A N/A Cost of ty pical major rebuild N/A N/A Date of last major rebuild N/A N/A Purpose of last major rebuild N/A N/A Increase or decrease in emissions N/A N/A Fuel ty pe: electric, gas, or oil Natural gas Natural gas Fuel consumption rate (KW /hr or BTU/hr) Not separately metered Not separately metered Moisture content wt (%) of formed mat: inlet See CBI submittal See CBI submittal outlet 0% 0% Air flow rate (acfm @ ° F) from curing 33,250 acfm @ 120 °F 32,000 acfm @ 350 °F Exhaust air temperature ( ° F) 120 °F 350 °F Residence time of product (mins) See CBI submittal See CBI submittal Binder content of cured product (LOI) 5% - 7% 4% - 7% Nature and frequency of routine/preventive
ma intenance procedures See CBI submittal See CBI submittal



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0004.xlsDescribe process modification(s) since 1999 that

reduce emissions The binder for all plant products was converted to a non-HAP binder in 2002 that significantly

reduces or elim inates HAP emissions from the manufacturing process; low NOx burners installed The binder for all plant products was converted to a non-HAP binder in 2002 that significantly

reduces or elim inates HAP emissions from the manufacturing process; replace burner with smaller MMBtu/hr Describe future source reduction plans and schedules See CBI submittal See CBI submittal



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0004.xls**FORM B-6**

**PLA NT OPERA** 

**TIONS**

**VI. Process - Cooling**

For each Cooling Operation: Cooling Operation 1 Cooling Operation 2 Process unit identification name/number 553 653
Process line(s) served (identification name/number) Line 105 Line 106 Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) 33.992108 33.992184 Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) -83.771842 -83.77165 Stack or vent height (ft) 110 110 Stack or vent diameter (ft) 4 3.17 Cooling air flow rate (acfm @ ° F) 24,000 acfm @ 152 °F 20,000 acfm @ 160 °F Percentage of cooling air recirculated (if any ) None None Cooling air temperature (°F) Am bient Am bient

Nature and frequency of routine/preventive
ma intenance procedures See CBI submittal See CBI submittal

Describe process modification(s) since 1999 that reduce emissions The binder for all plant products was converted to a non-HAP binder in 2002 that significantly

reduces or elim inates HAP emissions from the manufacturing process. The binder for all plant

products was converted to a non-HAP binder in 2002 that significantly

reduces or elim inates HAP emissions from the manufacturing process.



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0004.xlsDescribe future source reduction plans and schedules See CBI submittal See CBI submittal



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0004.xls**FORM B-7**

**PLA NT OPERA** 

**TIONS**

**VII. Process - Use of Solvents**

Use of Solvents

Volatile solvents used at your facility (where and how used) By agreement this question was limited to HAP containing solvents. W e interpret this question to applyto wool fiberglass lines, from melting through cooling. None List each solvent used and quantity(gal/y r) N/A Emission control device(s) used to control emissions from solvent usage/storage? N/A



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0004.xls**FORM B-8**

**PROCESS OPERA TIONS** 

VIII. Pollution Prevention

Please describe any

work practices, pollution prevention techniques, and control strategies evaluated and/or implemented at each process unit at your facility

(e.g., binder reformulation, alternative fuels usage, etc.) to reduce emissions of PM and HAPs y ou identified in Form E. You m ust specify

the year in which the facility im plem ented the practice/technique and identifythe emission reductions (if measured) from these practices/techniques. JM objects to this question in that it is unbounded in time. We interpret this question, like similar questions in the ICR, to seek data since 1999. W ith that interpretation, JM responds that the binder was reformulated to a formaldehyde free resin in 2002.



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0004.xls**FORM C-1**

**AI R POLLUTION CONTROL** 
**I. Electrostatic Precipitator (ESP)**

For each ESP: ESP 1 ESP 2 Process line(s) (identification name/number) Equipm ent/process(es) controlled. Include emission point designations (e.g., E3, E4 from plot plan) Module 1: 641E (in series after scubber) Module 2: 643E (in series after scubber) Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) 33.991585 33.991342 Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) -83.771424 -83.771417 Stack or vent height (units) 110 110 Stack or vent diameter (units) 8 8 Manufacturer and model GeoEnergy GeoEnergy Date of original installation 2000 2000 Number of collection plates and configuration Tube-Ty pe W et ESP Tube-Ty pe W et ESP Gas flow rate to ESP (acfm @ ° F) 140000 acfm @ 100 ° F 140000 acfm @ 100 ° F Inlet gas temperature ( ° F) 68 - 138 °F 63 - 82 °F Outlet gas temperature ( ° F) 100 ° F 100 ° F Inlet grain loading (gr/dscf) 0.4 0.4 Outlet grain loading (gr/dscf) 0.04 0.04 Average stack opacity (%) 0% 0% Pressure drop across ESP (in. H 2 O gauge) 2-10" Estimated 2-10" Estimated Plate area (ft2 ) Tube-Ty pe W et ESP Tube-Ty pe W et ESP Vendor guarantee on ESP efficency (attach copy ) Not available Not available Method of plate cleaning and frequency Wa sh with water Wa sh with water Flow rate of plate washwater to ESP (gpm), if applicable 435 gpm per W ESP 500 gpm per W ESP Temperature of plate washwater to ESP (° F), if applicable 75 °F 75 °F Source of plate washwater used for cleaning, if applicable City water City water Concentration (mg/l) of dissolved and suspended solids in plate washwater, if applicable 34 - 144 mg/l 34 - 144 mg/l Conditioning agents used and amounts (in gpm or lbs/hr), if applicable N/A N/A

Amount of wastewater generated (gpd), if applicable All water from ESP is recycled to other processes All water from ESP is recycled to other processes Amount of wastewater recycled (gpd), if applicable 100% 100% Amount of wastewater disposed of (gpd), if applicable None None Method of wastewater disposal, if applicalbe N/A N/A Quantity

of solid waste collected (lbs/y r) Not separately identified Not separately identified Line 106-Forning & Collection



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0004.xlsQuantitiy of solid waste recycled (lbs/y r) Not separately identified Not separately identified Quantity

of solid waste disposed of (lbs/y r) Not separately identified Not separately identified Method of solid waste disposal Landfill Landfill Nature and frequency of routine/preventive maintenance procedures See CBI submittal See CBI submittal Problems experienced with control device within the last five ye ars; how were problems solved? No major problems No major problems

Continuous monitoring method(s) used to monitor ESP performance, including parameters monitored Wa ter flow rate, gas inlet temperature, total solids content, primary

current, secondary

current, output voltage Wa ter flow rate, gas inlet

temperature, total solids content, primary

current, secondary

current, output voltage Describe any

plans to replace or upgrade ESP See CBI submittal See CBI submittal



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0004.xls**FORM C-2**

**AI R POLLUTION CONTROL** 

**II. Scrubber**

For each Scrubber: Scrubber 1 Scrubber 2 Process line(s) (identification name/number) Equipm ent/process(es) controlled. Include emission point designations (e.g., E3, E4 from plot plan) Module 1: 641E (in series prior to ESP) Module 2: 643E (in series prior to ESP) Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) 33.991585 33.991342 Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) -83.771424 -83.771417 Stack or vent height (units) 110 110 Stack or vent diameter (units) 8 8 Manufacturer and model GeoEnergy GeoEnergy Date of original installation 2000 2000 Ty pe (e.g., venturi, orifice) Venturi Venturi Gas flow rate to scrubber (acfm @ ° F) 140,000 acfm @ 100 °F 140,000 acfm @ 100 °F Inlet gas temperature ( ° F) 68 - 138 °F 63 - 82 °F Outlet gas temperature ( ° F) 100 °F 100 °F Inlet grain loading (gr/dscf) 0.4 0.4 Outlet grain loading (gr/dscf) 0.04 0.04 Average stack opacity (%) < 40% < 40% W ater flow rate to scrubber (gpm) 120 gpm 165 gpm Percent of scrubber water from recycled wastewater 0% 0%
Source of scrubbing water and ty pe of pretreatment. Substance(s) added as part of pretreatment and amount used (gpm or lbs/hr) City water City water HAP composition of wastewater (mg/L) Unknown Unknown Concentration (mg/L) of dissolved and suspended solids in scrubbing water 34 - 144 mg/l 34 - 144 mg/l Scrubbing water temperature ( ° F) 75 °F 75 °F Liquid/gas ratio (gal/10 3acfm) 0.86 1.18 Pressure drop across scrubber (in. H 2 O gauge) 6.5 6.5
Amount of wastewater generated (gpd) All water from Scrubber is recycled All water from Scrubber is recycled Amount of wastewater recycled (gpd) 100% 100% Line 106-Forming and Collection



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0004.xlsAmount of wastewater disposed of (gpd) None None

Method of wastewater disposal N/A N/A Quantity

of solid waste collected (lbs/y r) Not separately identified Not separately identified Quantity

of solid waste recycled (lbs/y r) Not separately identified Not separately identified Quantity

of solid waste disposed of (lbs/y r) Not separately identified Not separately identified Method of solid waste disposal Landfill Landfill Vendor guarantee on scrubber efficiency (attach copy ) Not available Not available

Nature and frequency of preventive maintenance procedures Preventive m aintenance checks performed once every quarter Preventive m aintenance

checks performed once every quarter Problems experienced with control device within the last five years; how were problem s solved? No major problems No major problems Continuous monitoring method(s) used to monitor scrubber performance, including parameters monitored Pressure drop, water flow rate Pressure drop, water flow rate Plans to replace or upgrade scrubber See CBI submittal See CBI submittal



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0004.xls**FORM C-3**

**AI R POLLUTION CONTROL** 

**III. Mechanical Collector**

For each Mechanical Collector: Mechanical Collector 1 Mechanical Collector 2 Mechanical Collector 3 Process line(s) (identification name/number) N/A Equipm ent/process(es) controlled. Include emission point designations (e.g., E3, E4 from plot plan) Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Stack or vent height (units) Stack or vent diameter (units) Manufacturer and model Date of original installation Ty pe of mechanical collector Gas flow rate to collector (acfm @ ° F) Inlet gas temperature ( ° F) Outlet gas temperature ( ° F) Inlet grain loading (gr/dscf) Outlet grain loading (gr/dscf) Average stack opacity (%) Overall pressure drop (in. H 2 O gauge) Vendor guarantee on mechanical collector efficiency (attach copy ) Quantity

of solid waste collected (lbs/y r) Quantity

of solid waste recycled (lbs/y r) Quantity

of solid waste disposed of (lbs/y r) Method of solid waste disposal
Nature and frequency of preventive maintenance procedures Problems experienced with control device within the last five ye ars; how were problems solved? Continuous monitoring method(s) used to monitor performance, including parameters monitored Plans to replace or upgrade mechanical collector



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0004.xls**FORM C-4**

**AI R POLLUTION CONTROL** 

**IV. Fabric Filter**

For each Fabric Filter: Fabric Filter 1 Fabric Filter 2 Process line(s) (identification name/number) Line 105 Line 106
Equipm ent/process(es) controlled. Include emission point designations (e.g., E3, E4 from plot plan) Melter Dust Collector- 530 Melter Dust Collector 631E, 632E via 631C, 632C Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) 33.991162 33.990903 Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) -83.771822 -83.771684 Stack or vent height (ft) 110 110 Stack or vent diameter (ft) 3.5 4.5 Manufacturer and model Dy nam ic Air 84A-64 Dy nam ic Air 84A-36 Date of original installation 1977 2000 Number of compartments 2 3 Number of bags per compartment 320 150 Filter material and coatings applied Poly propy lene felt Poly propy lene felt Fabric weight (oz/yd 2 ) 16 16 Filter surface area (ft 2 ) 10,172 7,065 Gas flow rate to filter (acfm @ ° F) 32,800 acfm @ 68 °F 50,000 acfm @ 68 ° F Inlet gas temperature ( ° F) 190 ° F 190 ° F Outlet gas temperature ( ° F) 68 °F 68 °F Inlet grain loading (gr/dscf) 0.5 0.5 Outlet grain loading (gr/dscf) 0.005 0.005 Average stack opacity (%) 0% 0% Overall pressure drop (in. H 2 O gauge) 0.5 0.5 Method and frequency of bag cleaning Pulse-jet Pulse-jet Vendor guarantee on fabric filter efficiency (attach copy ) None None Quantity

of solid waste collected (lbs/y r) Not separately identified Not separately identified Quantity

of solid waste recycled (lbs/y r) Not separately identified Not separately identified Quantity

of solid waste disposed of (lbs/y r) Not separately identified Not separately identified Method of solid waste disposal Landfill Landfill



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0004.xlsNature and frequency of preventive maintenance procedures Ouside contractor inspects quarterly , bags replaced as

needed. Ouside contractor inspects

quarterly , bags replaced as

needed. Problems experienced with control device within the last five years; how were problems solved? No major problems No major problems Continuous monitoring method(s) used to monitor performance, including parameters monitored Prressure drop Bag leak detection device, Pressure drop Plans to replace or upgrade fabric filter See CBI submittal See CBI submittal



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0004.xls**FORM C-5**

**AI R POLLUTION CONTROL** 

**V. Thermal Incinerator**

For each Thermal Incinerator: Thermal Incinerator 1 Process line(s) (identification name/number) Line 106
Equipm ent/process(es) controlled. Include emission point designations (e.g., E3, E4 from plot plan) Curing Oven 654E via 654C Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) 33.991970 Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) -83.771567 Stack or vent height (ft) 110 Stack or vent diameter (ft) 4 Manufacturer and model GeoEnergy Date of original installation 2000 Fuel ty pe: gas or oil Gas Fuel consumption rate (BTU/hr) Not separately metered Inlet gas flow rate (acfm @ ° F) 10,000 scfm Inlet gas temperature ( ° F) 350 F Combustion chamber gas temperature ( ° F) 1515 Outlet gas temperature ( ° F) 350 Inlet grain loading (gr/dscf) 2 Outlet grain loading (gr/dscf) 0.04 Average stack opacity (%) < 5% Excess air (%) 18% Residence time (sec) at temperature ( ° F) 1 @ 1515 Percent heat recovery 0% Vendor guarantee on incinerator efficiency (attach copy ) Not Available
Nature and frequency of preventive maintenance procedures PM on RTO every 1.5 - 2 y rs - shutdown, cool, and wash Problems experienced with control device within the last five years; how were problems solved? No major problems



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0004.xlsContinuous monitoring method(s) used to monitor

incinerator performance, including parameters monitored Temperature in combustion zone, Pressure drop Plans to replace or upgrade thermal incinerator See CBI submittal



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0004.xls**FORM C-6**

**AI R POLLUTION CONTROL** 

**VI. High Velocity A ir Filter (HVA**  **F)** High efficiency air filter

For each HVAF: HEAF 1 Process line(s) (identification name/number) Line 105
Equipm ent/process(es) controlled. Include emission point designations (e.g., E3, E4 from plot plan) Curing Oven 554E via 554C Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) 33.991853 Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) -83.77192 Stack or vent height (ft) 110 Stack or vent diameter (ft) 4 Manufacturer and model Andersen 2000 Date of original installation 1999 Inlet gas flow rate (acfm @ ° F) 33,250 acfm @ 120 ° F Inlet gas temperature ( ° F) 120 Outlet gas temperature ( ° F) 120 Inlet grain loading (gr/dscf) 40 Outlet grain loading (gr/dscf) 0.04 Average stack opacity (%) 25% W ater spray

pressure (sdig), if applicable N/A W ater spray

rate (gpm), if applicable N/A Filter face velocity

(acfm/ft 2 ) Not Available

Maximum pressure drop across mat (in. H 2 O gauge) 30
Vendor guarantee on HVAF efficiency (attach copy ) Not Available Method and frequency of filter mad advancement Not Available Amount of wastewater generated (gpd) None Amount of wastewater recycled (gpd) None Amount of wastewater disposed of (gpd) None Method of wastewater disposal None Quantity

of solid waste collected (lbs/y r) Not Separately Identified



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0004.xlsQuantity of solid waste recycled (lbs/y r) Not Separately Identified Quantity

of solid waste disposed of (lbs/y r) Not Separately Identified Method of solid waste disposal Landfill

Nature and frequency of preventive maintenance procedures Daily checks on fire cloth.
At oven cleanouts, all
me chanical components are inspected and repaired/replaced as necessary

. Problems experienced with control device within the last five years; how were problems solved? No problems encountered
Continuous monitoring method(s) used to monitor HVAF performance, including parameters monitored Pressure drop Plans to replace or upgrade HVAF See CBI submittal



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0004.xls**FORM C-7**

**AI R POLLUTION CONTROL** 

**VII. Mist Eliminator**

For each Mist Eliminator: Mist Eliminator 1 Mist Eliminator 2 Process line(s) (identification name/number) N/A Equipm ent/process(es) controlled. Include emission point designations (e.g., E3, E4 plot plan) Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Stack or vent height (units) Stack or vent diameter (units) Manufacturer and model Date of original installation Ty pe of mist eliminator Gas flow rate to mist eliminator (acfm @ ° F) Inlet gas temperature ( ° F) Outlet gas temperature ( ° F) Inlet grain loading (gr/dscf) Outlet grain loading (gr/dscf) Average stack opacity (%) Velocity

in m ist elim inator (ft/sec) Pressure drop (in. H 2 O gauge) For chevron blade mist eliminators: Spacing between blades (in.) W ashing frequency of blades For mesh pad mist eliminators: Number of pads or elements Thickness of pad (in.) or element dimensions Density

of pad, (lb/ft 3 ) W ashing frequency of pad
Vendor guarantee on mist eliminator efficiency (attach copy ) Amount of wastewater generated (gpd)



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0004.xlsAmount of wastewater recycled (gpd)

Amount of wastewater disposed of (gpd) Method of wastewater disposal Quantity

of solid waste collected (lbs/y r) Quantity

of solid waste recycled (lbs/y r) Quantity

of solid waste disposed of (lbs/y r) Method of solid waste disposal
Nature and frequency of preventive maintenance procedures Problems experienced with control device within the last five ye ars; how were problems solved? Continuous monitoring method(s) used to monitor mist eliminator performance, including parameters monitored Plans to replace or upgrade mist eliminator



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0004.xls**FORM C-8**

**AI R POLLUTION CONTROL** 
**VIII. Ventilation System**
For each Ventilation System: Ventilation System 1 Process line(s) (identification name/number) Equipm ent/process(es) controlled. Include emission point designations (e.g., E3, E4 from plot plan) Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Stack or vent height (units) Stack or vent diameter (units) For general or building ventilation: Ventilation system used Airflow control system used Number of air changes per hour For unit or local ventilation: Enclosure or hood design used Volume of enclosure or hood Capture velocity (ft/sec) Distance between hood and emission source (ft)



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0004.xls**FORM C-9**

**AI R POLLUTION CONTROL** 

**IX. Other**

For each Other Air Pollution Control Device (APCD): Other APCD 1 Other APCD 2 Other APCD 3 Process line(s) (identification name/number) Equipm ent/process(es) controlled. Include emission point designations (e.g., E3, E4 from plot plan) Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Stack or vent height (units) Stack or vent diameter (units) Description



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0004.xls**FORM D**

**PROCESS LINE STA RTUP A**  **ND SHUTDOWN NESHA**  **P not applicable**
1. For each startup and shutdown (SS) that occurred during the last five years, please provide the following information requested in A. through J.

A. Using the definitions provided above, indicate whether the event was a startup or shutdown; **No excess emission events during periods of startup and shutdown.** B. A description of the event, including identification of the
em issions source or sources associated with the startup or shutdown; **N/A**

C. W hether any

permit condition was exceeded and, if so, what permit condition was exceeded; **N/A**

D. W hether the event was covered by any contingency

plan for controlling emissions during startup and shutdown events and, if so, whether the plan was followed; if the plan was not followed, why not; **N/A**

E. The duration of the event; **N/A** F. The actions taken to minimize emissions during the event, including the use of any backup control systems; **N/A** G. Estimates or measurements, if any , of emissions during the event; if you did not have the ability to quantify

emissions during the event, please explain why ; **N/A**

H. W hether the emission profile of each unit was different during startup and shutdown than during normal operating conditions and, if so, how emissions were different and why ; please provide any supporting information; **N/A**

I. All performance test data collected during each period of SS; the test method used for each event; when the testing was conducted and why ; the test conditions at the time of testing; and whether the tests were associated with a routine startup or shutdown; and **No data available**

J. All monitoring data, including control system parameter
mo nitoring, collected during each period of SS. **Al l required Title V monitoring data would be collected.**  Startup: the setting in operation of an affected source or portion of an affected source for any purpose. Shutdown: the cessation of operation of an affected source or portion of an affected source for any purpose.



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0004.xlsIf this information is contained in periodic and immediate SS reports

(either stand-alone or contained within the periodic excess emissions report) submitted to your permitting authority , you may submit copies of those reports instead.
2. Are there any

ty pes of startup or shutdown events that you have been able to elim inate? If so, please describe the ty pe of event and explain how these events were elim inated. **N/A**
3. Please submit a copy of your SS plan if you are required to develop one. **No plan required** 4. Please provide all performance test data collected during periods of SS over the last 5 years. Indicate the test method used for each event. **No data available**
5. Please provide all m onitoring data, including control system parameter monitoring, collected during periods of SS over the last 5 ye ars. **N/A** 6. Optional: Do you wish to recommend a standard that would apply during startup or shutdown? If so, please describe the event to which the standard would apply ; the recommended standard (this could be an emission limitation, work practice, or operational standard) that would apply during the period; the basis for the recommended standard; why and how the standard would m inim ize
em issions during the event; and how would compliance be determined and/or monitored. **No**



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0004.xls**FORM E**

**PRESENCE OF A IR POLLUTA**  **NTS IN EMISSION POINTS a** 

Please provide any

existing emissions information and data covering hazardous air pollutants (HAP) and particulate matter (PM) for each listed process. Identify the appropriate box for which you are providing specific process information and/or pollutant em issions data.

**Me lting Furnace**  **Forming Curing**  Particulate Matter (PM, PM 2.5, PM Condensable) Chromium Compounds and Hexavalent Chromium (including any Cr speciation data) Other metal HAP (As, Be, Cd, Co, Hg, Mn, Ni, Pb, Sb, Se) Hydrogen Fluoride (HF) Hydrogen Chloride (HCl) Formaldehyde Phenol Methanol Other organic HAP The existing data requested here has been provided to EPA by the industry’s trade association, the North American Insulation Manufacturers Association (“NAIMA”). The existing data provided by NAIMA was set forth in NAIMA’s May 5, 2010 letter to EPA. The representative existing emissions data provided from fiber glass companies included test results for the following pollutants: formaldehyde, methanol, phenol, particulate matter, hydrogen fluoride, metals (antimony
, arsenic, bery llium , cadmium, chromium, cobalt, lead, manganese, nickel, and selenium), mercury , and hexavalent chromium. The representative existing emissions data provided from mineral wool companies included test results for the following pollutants: formaldehyde, methanol, phenol, particulate matter, carbon monoxide, carbony l sulfide, hydrogen fluoride, metals (antimony , arsenic, bery llium , cadmium, chromium, cobalt, lead, manganese, nickel, and selenium ), mercury , and hexavalent chromium. The scope of the existing data provided was the result of consensus reached by

EPA, NAIMA, and industry representatives. In addition to the existing data submitted to EPA, extensive new
em issions data is being collected from virtually all companies through the “BTEC, Inc. Quality Assurance Project Plan for the Mineral W ool and W ool Fiberglass Emissions Test Program.” This Test Program will collect and submit to EPA, through EPA’s Electronic Reporting Tool, representative emissions data for the following pollutants: formaldehyde, methanol, phenol, particulate matter, carbon monoxide, carbony l sulfide, hydrogen fluoride,
me tals (antimony , arsenic, bery llium , cadmium, chromium, cobalt, lead, manganese, nickel, and selenium), mercury , and hexavalent chromium.



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0004.xls**FORM E**

**PRESENCE OF A IR POLLUTA**  **NTS IN EMISSION POINTS a** 

Please provide any

existing emissions information and data covering hazardous air pollutants (HAP) and particulate matter (PM) for each listed process. Identify the appropriate box for which you are providing specific process information and/or pollutant em issions data.

Particulate Matter (PM, PM 2.5, PM Condensable) Chromium Compounds and Hexavalent Chromium (including any Cr speciation data) Other metal HAP (As, Be, Cd, Co, Hg, Mn, Ni, Pb, Sb, Se) Hydrogen Fluoride (HF) Hydrogen Chloride (HCl) Formaldehyde Phenol Methanol Other organic HAP **Cooling** The existing data requested here has been provided to EPA by the industry’s trade association, the North American Insulation Manufacturers Association (“NAIMA”). The existing data provided by NAIMA was set forth in NAIMA’s May 5, 2010 letter to EPA. The representative existing emissions data provided from fiber glass companies included test results for the following pollutants: formaldehyde, methanol, phenol, particulate matter, hydrogen fluoride, metals (antimony
, arsenic, bery llium , cadmium, chromium, cobalt, lead, manganese, nickel, and selenium), mercury , and hexavalent chromium. The representative existing emissions data provided from mineral wool companies included test results for the following pollutants: formaldehyde, methanol, phenol, particulate matter, carbon monoxide, carbony l sulfide, hydrogen fluoride, metals (antimony , arsenic, bery llium , cadmium, chromium, cobalt, lead, manganese, nickel, and selenium ), mercury , and hexavalent chromium. The scope of the existing data provided was the result of consensus reached by

EPA, NAIMA, and industry representatives. In addition to the existing data submitted to EPA, extensive new
em issions data is being collected from virtually all companies through the “BTEC, Inc. Quality Assurance Project Plan for the Mineral W ool and W ool Fiberglass Emissions Test Program.” This Test Program will collect and submit to EPA, through EPA’s Electronic Reporting Tool, representative emissions data for the following pollutants: formaldehyde, methanol, phenol, particulate matter, carbon monoxide, carbony l sulfide, hydrogen fluoride,
me tals (antimony , arsenic, bery llium , cadmium, chromium, cobalt, lead, manganese,



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0004.xls**FORM F-1**

**COST**
**I. Process Unit (e.g., cupola, curing oven, etc.):**

For each Process Unit: Process Unit 1 Process Unit 2 Process Unit 3 Process Unit ID All Units Process Line ID
**II. Capital Costs**

Base year JM objects to this request in its entirety

because it seeks information that is not relevant to the EPA Adm inistrator’s review obligations pursuant to Clean Air Act Section 112(d)(6) and 112(f)(2). Total capital cost, including costs for individual pieces, if available. See Above **III. A nnual Operating Costs**  Base year (most recent fiscal year) See Above Total annual operating costs See Above
Maintenance materials and replacement parts (specify costs by item ) See Above Raw m aterials costs See Above Labor ($/y r) for each labor class See Above (hr/hr) for each labor class See Above Utilities (breakdown for each utility ) See Above W aste treatment and/or disposal See Above Costs associated with any work practices and pollution prevention techniques that are employed at your facility See Above Savings associated with heat recovery and wastewater and/or solid waste returned to process from APCD (or sold to another user) See Above Indirect costs See Above Other (specify ) See Above



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0004.xlsPlease provide the annual report to shareholders or equivalent for the most

recent fiscal year. If reports are not available, provide annual sales and profits (or profit margin) for the most recent fiscal year. If company is publicly owned, please provide a web link to this information. N/A

Identify the market range (regional, national, international) of your products. National

Can your product(s) be substituted by another product(s)? If so, please list yo ur product(s) and substituted product(s). Wo ol fiberglass is used as insulation, as are cellulose (scrap newspaper) treated to resist fires, spray

foam, foam boards, cotton treated to resist fires, and sheep wool treated to resist fires. W ool fiberglass insulation is preferred over these alternative insulation
ma terials because it is easily , economically , and safety installed in various building settings, has superior fire performance capabilities, and a 70- ye ar history

of proven performance and durability

.



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0004.xls**FORM F-2**

**COST**

**I. A ir Pollution Control Device (A**  **PCD)** See form F-1

For each APCD: APCD 1 APCD ID Process Unit ID
**II. Capital Costs**

Base year JM objects to this request in its entirety because it seeks information that is not relevant to the EPA Adm inistrator’s review obligations pursuant to Clean Air Act Section 112(d)(6) and 112(f)(2). APCD equipm ent purchase cost and what was included See Above List the cost for each piece of auxiliary equipm ent for each APCD not included above See Above Installation cost See Above Land purchase cost See Above Total capital cost See Above Method of financining APCD See Above Retrofit installation See Above Field erected or modular See Above

**III. A nnual Operating Costs**  Base year (most recent fiscal year) See Above Maintenance materials and replacement parts (specify costs by item ) See Above Raw m aterials costs See Above



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0004.xlsLabor

($/y r) for each labor class See Above (hr/hr) for each labor class See Above Utilites (breackdown for each utility ) See Above W aste treatment and/or disposal See Above Indirect costs See Above Other (specify ) See Above Total annual operating cost (most recent fiscal year) See Above
Attach annual report to shareholders or equivalent for the most recent fiscal year. Alternatively , if company is publicly

owned, you can provide your company's web link to this information. See Above



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0004.xls