alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 11.1
                                       SBE, Inc.
                            Computation of earnings per share
                          for the three years ended October 31
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                  Years ended October 31
                                                                  ----------------------
                                                          1998             1997             1996
                                                          ----             ----             ----
<S>                                                  <C>               <C>              <C>
Basic earnings per share:

Net income (loss)                                       $380,349        $3,333,181      ($9,624,503)

Weighted average number of common
shares outstanding during the year                     2,666,707         2,501,786        2,131,593
                                                     ------------      ------------    -------------

Number of shares for computation of
net income (loss) per share                            2,666,707         2,501,786        2,131,593
                                                     ============      ============     ============

Basic earnings (loss) per share                            $0.14             $1.33           ($4.51)
                                                     ============      ============     ============


Diluted earnings per share:

Weighted average number of common
shares outstanding during the year                     2,666,707         2,501,786         2,131,593

Assumed issuance of stock under the
employee and non-employee stock
option plans                                             224,033           201,637               (a)
                                                     ------------      ------------      ------------

Number of shares for computation of
net income (loss) per share                            2,890,740         2,703,423         2,131,593
                                                     ============      ============      ============

Diluted earnings (loss) per share                          $0.13             $1.23            ($4.51)
                                                     ============      ============      ============
</TABLE>



(a)  In loss years common share equivalents would have an anti dilutive effect 
     on (loss) per share and therefore have been excluded.

                                     66
No. 12-5716.

#### Childers *v.*Ohio.

Ct. App. Ohio, Fairfield County. Certiorari denied.
#### State v. Kneisel

111,544

06/21/2016

Denied.

Unpublished
#### State v. Moore

110,706

06/21/2016

Denied.

Unpublished
Exhibit 23





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm








We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of Valpey-Fisher Corporation on Form S-8 (File No. 333-116001, effective May 28, 2004, File No. 333-67726, effective August 16, 2001, File No. 333-94491, effective January 12, 2000 and File No. 033-77554, post-effective amendments November 1, 1999) of our report dated February 22, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Valpey-Fisher Corporation included in this annual report on form 10-K for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008.





/s/ Stowe & Degon, LLC





Westborough, Massachusetts


March 25, 2010
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Dontrey Ray Walker , Appellant

No. 06

- 22

- 00167

- CR v.

The State of Texas , Appellee Appeal from the 188th District Court of Gregg County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 52408

- A ). Memorandum Opi nion delivered by Justice van Cleef
, Chief Justice Stevens and Justice Rambin participating.

As stated in the Court’s opi nion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court
below. However, we do find error in th e bill of costs. Theref ore, w e delete the assessment of $5, 2 27.50 for court

- appointed attorney fees from the bill of costs and affirm the trial court’s judgment

. We note that the appellant, Dontrey Ray Walker , has adequately indicated his inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RE ND ERED JULY 20, 2023 BY ORDER OF THE COURT SCOTT E. STEVENS CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey , Clerk
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

FRANCISCO JAVIER SEPULVEDAALDECOA,

Petitioner

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 90 MM 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 6th day of August, 2018, the “Praecipe for a Writ of King’s Bench 

Relief” is DENIED.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Micronetics, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), David Robbins, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                |  |        |  |                                                                    
|--------------- |  | ------ |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|August 16, 2007 |  |        |  | /s/ DAVID ROBBINS                                                  
|                |  | Name:  |  | David Robbins                                                      
|                |  | Title: |  | President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 23, 2022

No. 04-22-00118-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.T., X.T., L.T., Children

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020-PA-02021

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

In this accelerated appeal, the reporter’s record was due on March 7, 2022. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 35.1(b). To date, this court has not received a notification of late record or the reporter’s 

record. 

We order court reporter Elva Chapa to file the reporter’s record or a notification of late 

record in this court within ten days of the date of this order. 

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 23rd day of March, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
----

----

**EXHIBIT        32.2**

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|  | (1) | The                      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                      or 15(d) of                      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                      and |
|--|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The                        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all                        material                        respects, the financial condition and results of operations                        of the                        Company. |
|--|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| November                  14, 2007 | /s/                  LaGrand                  Johnson                          |
|------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                               | LaGrand                  Johnson                                                                                                                                                                            |
|                               | President,                  Chief Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                         |

----
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 67 (Tuesday, April 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 16809]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-8901]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Formations of, Acquisitions by, 
and Mergers of Bank Holding Companies; Correction

    This notice corrects a notice (FR Doc. 97-8135) published on page 
15518 of the issue for Tuesday, April 1, 1997.
    On page 15519, under the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas heading, 
the entry for BonState Bancshares, Inc., Bonham, Texas, is revised to 
read as follows:
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (Genie D. Short, Vice President) 
2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. BonState Bancshares, Inc., Bonham, Texas, and Bonham Financial 
Services, Inc., Dover, Delaware; to become bank holding companies by 
acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of Bonham State Bank, 
Bonham, Texas.
    Comments on this application must be received by April 25, 1997.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 2, 1997.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-8901 Filed 4-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-10088 Conference Calendar

LUCIAN LEE SPANN, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus L.W. WOODS, Warden of McConnel Unit (formerly Warden of Price Daniel Unit), in his individual capacity; ET AL., Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:94-CV-141-C

- - - - - - - - - - June 27, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Lucian Lee Spann, Jr., TDCJ No. 591831, a Texas state prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying his motions to amend his complaint, for a subpoena duces tecum, and for a copy of the district court’s file in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. This court must determine if it has appellate jurisdiction on its own motion, if necessary. Williams v. Brown & Root, Inc. ,No. 96-10088 - 2 - 828 F.2d 325, 327 (5th Cir. 1987). The district court’s order denying Spann’s motions to amend his complaint, for a subpoena duces tecum, and for a copy of the district court’s file is not an appealable final order and is not appealable under the collateral order doctrine. See Dardar v. Lafourche Realty Co. , 849 F.2d 955, 957 (5th Cir. 1988); EEOC v. Kerrville Bus Co. , 925 F.2d 129, 134 (5th Cir. 1991). Accordingly, Spann’s appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. See Loc. R. 42.2. We warn Spann that the filing of frivolous appeals will result in additional sanctions. E.g. , Smith v. McCleod , 946 F.2d 417, 418 (5th Cir. 1991); Jackson v. Carpenter , 921 F.2d 68, 69 (5th Cir. 1991). If Spann has any other appeals pending in this court at this time, he should review them in light of the foregoing warning and move to withdraw any appeal that is frivolous.
APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
**EXHIBIT
32.1**
 ****
 ****
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**
 ****
 ****
 **18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 ****
 ****
 **AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**
 ****
 ****
 **OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 ****
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Longview Fibre Company (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-Q"), I, R. H.
Wollenberg, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)
    The
      Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
      and
  
  (2)
    The
      information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
  Dated:
March 10, 2005
   R. H.
WOLLENBERG
   R. H.
WOLLENBERG
   President,
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 69 (Thursday, April 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 17605]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-9267]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-172-002]


ANR Storage Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

April 4, 1997.
    Take notice that on April 1, 1997, ANR Storage Company (ANRS) 
tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original Volume No. 
1, the tariff sheets listed on the Appendix A to the filing, to be 
effective June 1, 1997.
    ANRS states that the attached tariff sheets are being filed in 
compliance with the Commission's Order issued on February 13, 1997 in 
the above captioned docket. The tariff sheets incorporate changes to 
conform to the standards adopted by the Gas Industry Standards Board at 
Docket No. RM96-1-000.
    ANRS states that copies of the filing were served upon the 
company's Jurisdictional customers.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests should be filed 
on or before April 21, 1997. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this 
filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public 
inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-9267 Filed 4-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# **Exhibit 21**

 

Subsidiaries of the Registrant

 

 

The following is a list of the Registrant’s subsidiaries (all of whichare 100% owned):

 
|                      | **State or Other Jurisdiction** |
|---------------------------|---------------------------------|
|                      | **of Incorporation**            |
|                      |                            |   |
| MATEC EFO Corp.           |                            | Massachusetts |
| Matec International, Inc. |                            | Massachusetts |
| MEKontrol, Inc.           |                            | Massachusetts |
| MTCI, Inc.                |                            | Delaware |
| Old MAS, Inc.             |                            | Delaware |
| Valpey-Fisher Corporation |                            | Massachusetts |

 

----
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2018384EN.01000301.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 24.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 384/3 |

---

Notice of the Government of Denmark pursuant to Council Directive 2009/119/EC imposing an obligation on Member States to maintain minimum stocks of crude oil and/or petroleum products

(2018/C 384/03)

In accordance with Article 9(4) of Council Directive 2009/119/EC of 14 September 2009 imposing an obligation on Member States to maintain minimum stocks of crude oil and/or petroleum products [(1)](#ntr1-C_2018384EN.01000301-E0001), Denmark hereby notifies its undertaking to maintain specific stocks.

1.

The level of the specific stocks that Denmark undertakes to maintain is equivalent to 30 days of average daily consumption.

2.

The undertaking applies to the period from 1 July 2018 to 30 June 2019.

3.

The specific stocks will be composed of the following product categories:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Motor gasoline, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Gas/diesel oil. |

4.

The stocks will be owned and held by the central Danish stockholding entity, Foreningen Danske Olieberedskabslagre (FDO).

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2018384EN.01000301-E0001)  [OJ L 265, 9.10.2009, p. 9](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2009_265_R_TOC).

---
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.49

                            DIRECTORS' EQUITY PROGRAM

     By unanimous Consent the Cambrex Corporation Board of Directors resolved
that as of January 1, 2008, no non-employee director shall receive a stock
option award under the terms of the Non-Employee Director Program of the 1996,
1998, 2001 and 2003 Stock Option Plans and the 2004 Incentive Plan, as such
option award Program is described in the Company's Proxy Statement for its 2008
Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Such Consent further established a new
Directors' Equity Program which provides that on the last business day of each
calendar quarter commencing on March 31, 2008, each Non-employee Director shall
receive an award of Restricted Stock Units ("RSU's") equivalent in value to Four
Thousand Dollars ($4,000) such number of RSU's to be determined by dividing the
sum of Four Thousand Dollars ($4,000) by the closing share price on the date of
the award rounded down to the nearest full share, provided that such RSU's shall
neither vest nor be available for sale until a period of six (6) months from the
date of grant.
Exhibit 11.2

<TABLE>

    STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS RESEARCH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
     Calculation of Fully Diluted Earnings Per Common Share
                                
              (in thousands, except per share data)
                                
<CAPTION>




                                  Three Months          Six Months
                                 Ended June 30,       Ended June 30,
                                 1997       1996      1997       1996
<S>                           <C>        <C>       <C>        <C> 
FULLY DILUTED                                                  

 Average shares outstanding    33,614     32,964    33,488     32,473
                                                               
  Net effect of dilutive stock                                  
   options after              
   application of the
   treasury stock method        1,747      2,225         -      2,377
                               ------     ------   -------     ------
       Total                   35,361     35,189    33,488     34,850
                               ======     ======   =======     ======
       Net income             $ 9,878    $ 6,607   $(2,522)   $12,963
                              =======     ======   =======     ======                                                               
       Net income per share   $   .28    $   .19   $  (.08)   $   .37
                              =======     ======   =======     ======
</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Joseph Lee Taylor v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-15-00800-CR

Trial court case number: 76613-CR

Trial court: 239th District Court of Brazoria County

Appellant, Joseph Lee Taylor, has filed a “Motion for Extension of Time to File 

Response to Notice Regarding Certification of Defendant’s Right of Appeal.” On August 

4, 2016, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the trial court’s “Certification of 

Defendant’s Right of Appeal” indicated that he had waived the right of appeal and the 

Court might dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction unless he filed a response 

showing that the Court had jurisdiction of the appeal by August 18, 2016. Appellant 

requests an extension to October 17, 2016 to respond to the notice. The motion is 

granted in part.

Appellant’s response to the August 4, 2016 notice must be filed no later than 30 

days from the date of this order. If a meritorious response is not timely received in the 

form described in the August 4, 2016 notice, the Court may dismiss the appeal for want 

of jurisdiction without further notice.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Terry Jennings

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: August 23, 2016
Drone Aeronautical Consultants, LLC seeks exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R Sections 61.113(a)&(b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b).

Drone Aeronautical Consultants, LLC requests to commercially operate an Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) for the purpose of conducting aerial video and photography over certain areas of the

United States.

T he re is enhanced sa fety achieved using an unmanned aircraft (UA) with the specifications described by the petitioner and carrying no passengers or crew, rather than a manned aircraft of significantly greater proportions, carrying crew in addition to flammable fuel . The UAS operation enabled by this exem ption is in the public interest and wil l benefit the public as a whole and will not adversely affect safety.

Operations of this UA will be in accordance with all manufacturers specifications and in strict adherence to the NPRM part 107 rules and regulations put forth for future UA integration into the national airspace system.
EXHIBIT 99



Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002



In connection with the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Refac, a Delaware corporation (the Company), for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of Robert L. Tuchman, as Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, and Raymond A. Cardonne, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his
knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





|/S/    ROBERT L.
TUCHMAN                             
|-----------------------------------------------------
|Robert L. Tuchman                                    
|President, Chief Executive Officerand General Counsel
|March 31, 2003                                       





|/S/    RAYMOND A.
CARDONNE, JR.                     
|----------------------------------------------------
|Raymond A. Cardonne                                 
|Vice President, Secretaryand Chief Financial Officer
|March 31, 2003                                      



This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.