alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1


                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.1

                        STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION
                             OF PER SHARE EARNINGS


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Statement Regarding Computation of                      Year to Date
Per Share Earnings                                     ended March 31,
                                             -------------------------------

                                                  1999                1998
                                                  ----                ----
<S>                                          <C>                 <C>
Basic earnings per share:
  Weighted-average shares outstanding          1,771,127           1,653,917
  Net income per share                       $       .35         $       .38

Diluted earnings per share:
  Weighted average shares outstanding          1,771,127           1,653,917
  Dilutive stock options                          20,000              20,000
  Assumed repurchased under treasury
     stock method                                (19,056)            (15,283)
                                             -----------         -----------
  Weighted-average common shares
     outstanding and common share
        equivalents                            1,772,071           1,658,634
                                             -----------         -----------

Net income                                   $   622,000         $   625,000
                                             ===========         ===========

Diluted net income per share                 $       .35         $       .38
                                             ===========         ===========
</TABLE>





















                                 Page 16 of 17
EXHIBIT 32.1


                               Color Imaging, Inc.
               Form 10-Q - Third Quarter Ended September 30, 2004

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jui-Kung, certify that to the best of my knowledge:

The Form 10-Q of Color  Imaging,  Inc. for the period ended  September  30, 2004
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

The  information  contained  in such report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of Color  Imaging,
Inc. for the periods presented.

This   certification  is  being  furnished   pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley   Act  of  2002  and,  except  to  the  extent  required  by  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act,  shall not be  deemed  to be filed as part of the  periodic
report described herein nor shall it be deemed filed by Color Imaging,  Inc. for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



                                      /S/ JUI-KUNG WANG
                                      ---------------------------------------
                                      Jui-Kung Wang
                                      Chief Executive Officer
  Date: October 26, 2004
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906

of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of Safeco Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-K), I, Paula Rosput Reynolds,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |                                                
|------------------------ |  | -----------------------------------------------
|Dated: February 23, 2007 |  |                                                
|                         |  | /s/ Paula Rosput Reynolds                      
|                         |  | Paula Rosput Reynolds                          
|                         |  | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Safeco Corporation and will be retained by Safeco Corporation
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### State v. Genton

106,517

10/07/13

Denied. ...

Unpublished
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-40843

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

EDMUNDO LOPEZ-ESCAMILLA, also known as Mundo,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:14-CR-91-15

Before DAVIS, COSTA, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Edmundo Lopez-Escamilla has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Lopez-Escamilla has filed a response. He has also moved for the 

appointment of substitute counsel. The record is not sufficiently developed to 

allow us to make a fair evaluation of Lopez-Escamilla’s claims of ineffective 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 21, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 17-40843 Document: 00514523823 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/21/2018
No. 17-40843

2

assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims without 

prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 

(5th Cir. 2014).

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record 

reflected therein, as well as Lopez-Escamilla’s response. We concur with 

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

appellate review.

Our review reveals a clerical error in the judgment. The judgment states 

that Lopez-Escamilla pleaded guilty to conspiracy to possess with intent to 

manufacture and distribute cocaine. Lopez-Escamilla pleaded guilty to 

conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine; therefore, the word 

“manufacture” should be deleted from the description of the nature of the 

offense.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, 

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS 

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Lopez-Escamilla’s request for the 

appointment of substitute counsel is DENIED. This matter is REMANDED 

for the limited purpose of correcting the clerical error in the judgment. 

See FED. R. CRIM. P. 36.

 Case: 17-40843 Document: 00514523823 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/21/2018
# Table 6.2
##### 



Exhibit 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS CONSENT

The Board of Directors
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Holdings, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 333-58386 and 333-92489) on Form S-3 and (Nos. 333-59690, 333-80595,
333-80597 and 333-83891) on Form S-8 of R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Holdings, Inc. of
our report dated January 24, 2002, except as to notes 14 and 22, which are as
of February 7, 2002, and note 23, which is as of January 8, 2004, with respect
to the consolidated balance sheets of R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Holdings, Inc. as
of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related consolidated statements of
income, stockholders equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for the
years then ended, which report appears in the December 31, 2001, amendment to
annual report on Form 10-K/A of R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Holdings, Inc.

Our report refers to the restatement of the previously issued 2000 consolidated
statement of income for the reclassification of an income tax benefit from
continuing operations to discontinued operations.

/s/KPMG LLP

Greensboro, North Carolina
March 4, 2004
U.S. Energy Information Administration Quarterly Coal Report, October - December 2023

Table 34. Coal consumption at other industrial plants by census division and state

(thousand short tons)

Year to date

Census division

and state

October - December

2023

July - September

2023

October - December

2022 2023 2022

Percent

change

Middle Atlantic 112 122 176 579 703 -17.6

New York 31 25 72 191 241 -21.1

Pennsylvania 82 98 104 389 461 -15.8

East North Central 884 976 1,004 3,871 4,241 -8.7

Illinois 381 439 441 1,721 1,866 -7.8

Indiana 278 300 309 1,178 1,229 -4.1

Michigan 69 100 74 327 313 4.4

Ohio 78 81 82 340 376 -9.5

Wisconsin 78 56 98 305 456 -33.2

West North Central 2,260 2,061 2,690 9,581 11,299 -15.2

Iowa 530 565 557 2,158 2,362 -8.6

Kansas 31 30 25 117 86 35.9

Minnesota 261 119 260 913 880 3.8

Missouri 193 186 204 757 845 -10.4

Nebraska 148 117 232 672 972 -30.9

North Dakota 1,027 972 1,344 4,696 5,891 -20.3

South Dakota 70 72 68 268 263 2.0

South Atlantic 314 353 490 1,419 1,969 -27.9

Florida 23 26 38 99 188 -47.1

Georgia 42 46 56 178 261 -31.7

Maryland 95 99 114 372 425 -12.6

North Carolina 25 27 96 186 375 -50.5

South Carolina 16 19 28 72 93 -22.2

Virginia 57 68 99 277 367 -24.4

West Virginia 56 68 60 234 261 -10.0

East South Central 597 545 629 2,301 2,590 -11.2

Alabama 112 104 156 425 655 -35.2

Kentucky 165 159 190 680 801 -15.1

Mississippi 22 17 18 79 69 14.1

Tennessee 298 265 265 1,117 1,065 4.9

West South Central 177 208 205 762 947 -19.6

Arkansas 28 35 35 139 141 -1.7

Louisiana 70 76 82 278 332 -16.3

Oklahoma 34 44 29 143 201 -28.9

Texas 46 53 59 202 273 -26.0

Mountain 620 556 727 2,339 2,695 -13.2

Arizona 58 66 60 239 260 -7.8

Colorado 28 27 42 127 153 -17.1

Idaho 15 6 26 49 76 -36.3

Montana 82 37 98 198 250 -20.8

Nevada 50 53 43 191 212 -10.0

New Mexico 16 17 18 62 62 -1.3

Utah 76 81 85 308 318 -3.0

Wyoming 294 270 355 1,166 1,364 -14.5

Pacific 367 318 416 1,381 1,448 -4.7

Alaska s s s 1 1 s

California 327 303 377 1,277 1,322 -3.4

Oregon 18 - 21 28 48 -41.6

Washington 21 15 18 75 78 -3.3

U.S. Total 5,332 5,141 6,336 22,233 25,891 -14.1

- = No data reported.

s = Absolute percentage less than 0.05 or value is less than 0.5 of the table metric.

Note: Total may not equal sum of components because of independent rounding.

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), Form EIA-3, 'Quarterly Survey of Industrial, Commercial & Institutional Coal Users' and Form EIA-7A, 'Annual

Survey of Coal Production and Preparation.'
Exhibit 24: Power of Attorney

The undersigned directors of The Ryland Group, Inc., a Maryland corporation, constitute and appoint Timothy J. Geckle the true and lawful agent and
attorney-in-fact of the undersigned, with full power and authority in said agent and attorney-in-fact to sign for the undersigned, in their respective
names as directors of The Ryland Group, Inc., the Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Ryland Group, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, to be filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Dated:
February 23, 2006

| |  | /s/ R. Chad DreierR. Chad Dreier, Chairman of the Board, President and
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
| |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ Daniel T. BaneDaniel T. Bane, Director                                                                                  
| |  | /s/ Leslie M. FréconLeslie M. Frécon, Director                                                                              
| |  | /s/ Roland A. HernandezRoland A. Hernandez, Director                                                                        
| |  | /s/ William L. JewsWilliam L. Jews, Director                                                                                
| |  | /s/ Ned MansourNed Mansour, Director                                                                                        
| |  | /s/ Robert E. MellorRobert E. Mellor, Director                                                                              
| |  | /s/ Norman J. MetcalfeNorman J. Metcalfe, Director                                                                          
| |  | /s/ Charlotte St. MartinCharlotte St. Martin, Director                                                                      
| |  | /s/ Paul J. VarelloPaul J. Varello, Director                                                                                
| |  | /s/ John O. WilsonJohn O. Wilson, Director                                                                                  

---

---
Exhibit
10.33  AMENDMENT NO. 1  TO  THE RYLAND GROUP, INC. PERFORMANCE AWARD PROGRAM   The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors
of The Ryland Group, Inc. (the Corporation), pursuant to its power and
authority to amend the Performance Award Program (Award Program), amends the
Award Program effective as of January 1, 2005, to confirm that the Plan is
exempt from the requirements of section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code as a
short-term deferral program described under Treas. Reg. 1.409A-1(b)(4).  Accordingly, the Award Program is amended by adding
the following sentence to the end of the Section titled Distribution of
Performance Awards:  Notwithstanding anything in the Award Program to
the contrary, all payments of performance awards shall be made to Participants within
two and one-half months following the end of year during which the participant
becomes vested in the performance award.   IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment No. 1 has been duly
executed by the Corporation, effective as of January 1, 2005.   ATTEST/WITNESS
  
  THE
  RYLAND GROUP, INC.____________________________________________________
  
  By:________________________________________________Print Name:__________________________________________
  
  Print Name:_________________________________________Date:______________________________________________
Exhibit 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, William B. Heye, Jr., the Chief Executive Officer of
SBE, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

      1.    The Company's  Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October
            31, 2004,  to which this  Certification  is attached as Exhibit 32.1
            (the "Periodic  Report"),  fully complies with the  requirements  of
            Section  13(a) or Section  15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of
            1934, as amended; and

      2.    The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
            all  material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of
            operation  of the  Company at the end of the  period  covered by the
            Periodic Report.


Dated:   January 14, 2005

/s/ William B. Heye Jr.
--------------------------
William B. Heye Jr.
Chief Executive Officer
#### Marquez v. Kansas Dept. of Corrections

111,327

10/07/2015

Denied.

50 Kan. App. 2d 983
Exhibits
**Exhibit 23.3**
**Consent of Registered Independent PublicAccountants**We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8(No. 333-7590) of Royal Dutch Petroleum Company and The“Shell” Transport and Trading Company, Public LimitedCompany of our report dated May 22, 2004, except forNote 2(b) (Second Restatement of previously issuedfinancial statements) and Note 30 (Subsequent events) whichare as of March 3, 2005 relating to the FinancialStatements of the Royal Dutch/Shell Group of Companies which isincluded in this Amendment No. 2 to the 2003 Annual Reporton Form 20-F.
/s/ KPMG Accountants N.V.---------------------------------------------------------------
**KPMG Accountants N.V.****The Hague — TheNetherlands**
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP---------------------------------------------------------------
**PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP****London — United Kingdom**
March 3, 2005 **E 4 **RoyalDutch/Shell Group of Companies 20-F/A (Amendment No. 2) 2003
**Exhibit 10.23**

**Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation**

          Ruddick Corporation (the “Company”) compensates each member of its Board of Directors (the “Board) who is not an employee of the Company or its subsidiaries.  Effective January 1, 2006, non-employee directors will receive $26,000 per year for services as a director, plus $1,500 for each Board meeting or committee meeting attended.  In addition to the general fees for directors described above, the Chairman of the Board, the Chairman of the Executive Committee of the Board and the Chairman of the Audit Committee of the Board are paid an additional annual fee of $30,000, $30,000 and $6,000, respectively, for services as chairman of the Board or the indicated committee, as applicable.

          Non-employee directors of the Company may defer the payment of the annual fee and/or Board meeting fees, pursuant to the Company’s Director Deferral Plan (the “Deferral Plan”).  The deferred fees are converted into a number of shares of Common Stock of the Company (the “Common Stock”) with a fair market value equal to the value of the fees deferred, and the number of shares is then credited to the director’s account, along with the amount of any dividends or stock distributions.  Upon termination of service as a director or in the event of death, the balance of the director’s account will be distributed to the director or a designated beneficiary.

          Under the Company’s 1995 Comprehensive Stock Option Plan (the “1995 Plan”), the Company automatically granted each non-employee director at the time the 1995 Plan was adopted a ten-year option to purchase 10,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the Common Stock on the date of the option grant.  Since that time, pursuant to the provisions of the Company’s stock option plans, the Company has automatically granted a ten-year option to purchase 10,000 shares of Common Stock to each new non-employee director upon his or her initial election as director.  These options are immediately vested, and the exercise price of these options is equal to the fair market value of the Common Stock on the date of the director’s election.  

          The Company grants additional incentive awards to its non-employee directors from time to time, at the Board’s discretion.  These incentive awards generally have taken the form of stock option grants and discretionary contributions by the Company to the Deferral Plan for the benefit of each non-employee director, however, other award types may be granted in the future at the discretion of the Board.  On November 17, 2005, the Board approved discretionary contributions by the Company to the Deferral Plan for the benefit of each non-employee director in the amount of $10,000.

          The Company also provides life insurance coverage for each non-employee director.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 63 (Wednesday, April 2, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 15741]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-8366]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster #2937; Amdt. 2]


State of Tennessee

    In accordance with a notice from the Federal Emergency Management 
Agency, dated March 19, 1997, the above-numbered Declaration is hereby 
amended to include the Counties of Lake and Tipton in the State of 
Tennessee as a disaster area due to damages caused by heavy rain, 
tornadoes, flooding, hail and high winds beginning on February 28, 1997 
and continuing.
    In addition, applications for economic injury loans from small 
businesses located in the contiguous county of New Madrid, Missouri, 
may be filed until the specified date at the previously designated 
location. Any counties contiguous to the above-named primary counties 
and not listed herein have been covered under a separate declaration 
for the same occurrence.
    The number assigned to this disaster for economic injury is 943200 
for Missouri.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008)

    Dated: March 21, 1997.
Bernard Kulik,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 97-8366 Filed 4-1-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P