alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Q: \ Special Services \ Documents \ FORMS \ #923 Frequency Management Agreement.doc 12/2009 ISM From the 20 1 1 Official AMA National Model Aircraft Safety Code

Radio Control Section, # 5 : RC model aircraft will not operate within three (3) miles of any pre

- existing flying site without a frequency

management agreement.

A frequency

- management agreemen t may be an allocation of frequencies for each site, a day

- use agreement between sites, or testing which determines that no interference exists. A frequency

management agreement may exist between two or more AMA chartered clubs, AMA clubs and individual

AM A members, or individual AMA members. Frequency

- management agreements, including an interference test report if the agreement indicates no interference exists, will be signed by all parties and copies provided to AMA Headquarters

Variations for AMA Freque ncy Management Agreements :

1 st Party 2 nd Party

AMA c hartered c lub AMA c hartered c lub

AMA c hartered c lub Club not affiliated with AMA

AMA c hartered c lub Individual AMA m ember 

Individual AMA m ember Individual AMA m ember

Individual AMA m ember Individu al not affiliated with AMA

There can be more than 2 parties involved in a Frequency Management A greement . Be sure to assign the designated frequencies to all parties and inform all involved members (i.e. post the assignments at the flying site).

Please note, that only officers of the c hartered c lub can sign the Frequency Management Agreements on behalf of the club.

Note:

Once a Frequency Management Agreement is in place it does not have to be renewed on a yearly basis. It is valid until one or both par ties (if AMA c hartered c lub) disband, relocate, or sell the property. The agreement is only valid for the specific parties named, which means if a club disbands and another AMA

c hartered c lub/ i ndividual m ember uses the flying site, a new Frequency Manageme nt Agreement will have to be created, signed by all parties involved, and copies sent to AMA HQ.

Participants in the Frequency Management Agreement are responsible for informing any guest flying at the site about the agreement and enforcing that only freq uencies assigned for that particular site are used!

Important:

The Frequency Management Agreement requirement is waived on a provisional basis for club(s) operating exclusively on 2.4 GHz. However, the club will have to submit a 2.4 GHz agreement to AMA.

 Individual AMA member means that the individual is using the specific property for RC Flying unrelated to any club affiliation he or she might have, within proximity of another party.
Exhibit 31.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

     I, Peter H. Stelling, Chief Financial Officer, Vice President and Treasurer
of Scan-Optics, Inc., certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Scan-Optics, Inc.;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statement
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and we have:

          a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

          b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

          c) Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this
report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

     5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):

          a) All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or
operation of internal controls which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
data; and

          b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls.


Date: April 29, 2004

                                        /ss/
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Peter H. Stelling
                                        Chief Financial Officer, Vice President
                                        and Treasurer
# Data for Table A5

# RSEs for Table A5
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-01-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,033,911
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  641,345
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,894,772
<PP&E>                                      30,877,139
<DEPRECIATION>                              18,919,632
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,830,001
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       20,000,104
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        28,490
<OTHER-SE>                                 (4,492,729)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,830,001
<SALES>                                     31,796,436
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            31,796,436
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               32,384,260
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             708,975
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                524,806
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            511,806
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   511,806
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .41
        

</TABLE>
#### State v. Saldana

111,429

03/28/2016

Denied.

Unpublished
#### Phillips v. Phillips

105,349

105,748

12/27/13

Denied

Unpublished
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6922

KAIMEL GLENN, Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. ISAH TESSEMA, Doctor, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:08-cv-02304-WDQ)

Submitted: September 29, 2009 Decided: October 7, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kaimel Glenn, Appellant Pro Se. Philip Melton Andrews, Katrina J. Dennis, KRAMON & GRAHAM, PA, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Kaimel Glenn appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Glenn v. Tessema , No. 1:08-cv-02304-WDQ (D. Md. Mar. 19, 2009). We deny Glenn’s numerous pending motions: for appointment of counsel, for $150,000 in punitive damages and the removal of Dr. Isah Tessema, for $50,000 in punitive damages and the removal of Nurse Barnhart, for $75,000 in damages and the removal of April Baker, and for $250,000 in punitive damages from CMS, a private contractor of medical services. We deny as moot Glenn’s motions for summary judgment and injunctive relief pending appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 10.28

Current Executive Officer Salary and Bonus Arrangements

Base Salaries

The current base salaries for the executive officers of The Rowe Companies (the Company) are as follows:



|                                     |  |             |            |    
|------------------------------------ |  | ----------- | ---------- | ---
|Name and Title                       |  | Base Salary |           
|Gerald M. Birnbach                   |  | $           | 939,924.00 | (1)
|Chairman of the Board and President  |  |             |            |    
|                                     | 
|Barry A. Birnbach                    |  | $           | 260,000.00 |    
|Vice President - Corporate           |  |             |            |    
|Development                          |  |             |            |    
|                                     | 
|Timothy J. Fortune                   |  | $           | 212,500.00 |    
|Senior Vice President - Operations - |  |             |            |    
|Rowe Furniture Corporation           |  |             |            |    
|                                     | 
|Garry W. Angle                       |  | $           | 160,000.00 | (2)
|Vice President-Treasurer             |  |             |            |    

---

|(1) | Pursuant to his employment agreement, Mr. Gerald Birnbachs base salary is subject to adjustment annually based on increases in the Consumer Price Index pursuant to a
formula set forth in the agreement.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | Mr. Angle became an executive officer upon his promotion to Vice President-Treasurer effective January 6, 2006.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Description of Bonus Arrangements

Under the terms of his employment agreement, Mr. Gerald Birnbach may receive cash bonuses for unusual efforts to be awarded in the sole discretion of the Companys Board of Directors. The other executive officers may be awarded
cash bonuses based on individual and corporate performance in the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee of the Companys Board of Directors.

The arrangements described above are in addition to the various other compensatory plans, contracts and arrangements in which the executive officers participate and which were previously filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
Exhibit 32.2



Statement of Chief Financial Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of San Diego Gas & Electric (the "Company") certifies that:



(i)

the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the "Annual Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii)

the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







February 26, 2008



/S/  Dennis V. ArriolaDennis V. ArriolaChief Financial Officer
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 352 

Encouraging banks and mortgage servicers to work with families affected 

by contaminated drywall to allow temporary forbearance without penalty 

on payments on their home mortgages. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 10, 2009 

Mr. WARNER (for himself, Ms. LANDRIEU, Mr. VITTER, Mr. WEBB, Mr. NELSON of Florida, and Mr. LEMIEUX) submitted the following resolution; 

which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Encouraging banks and mortgage servicers to work with 

families affected by contaminated drywall to allow temporary forbearance without penalty on payments on their 

home mortgages. 

Whereas since January 2009, over 1,300 cases of contaminated drywall have been reported in 26 States and the 

District of Columbia; 

Whereas many individuals living in homes with contaminated 

drywall have reported problems with their health, including bloody noses, rashes, sore throats, burning eyes, and 

upper respiratory tract conditions; 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 352 ATS 

Whereas some homeowners living with contaminated drywall 

have reported corrosion of metals inside their homes, 

such as air conditioning coils and electrical wiring; 

Whereas as a result of these problems, many families that 

have contaminated drywall in their homes have moved 

out of their residences and into temporary living situations, with few such families being able to afford an additional financial burden; 

Whereas because of cases of contaminated drywall, some 

Americans who pay their mortgages on time are now suffering from financial problems at no fault of their own; 

and 

Whereas banks and mortgage servicers can help families affected by contaminated drywall by providing temporary 

forbearance with respect to their mortgage payments to 

help such families afford the costs of an additional residence while they are removed from their primary homes: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate encourages banks and 

2 mortgage servicers to work with families affected by con3 taminated drywall to allow temporary forbearance without 

4 penalty on payments on their home mortgages. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                               12-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      FEB-29-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                           MAY-31-2000
<CASH>                                                      38,000
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                              488,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                                44,000
<INVENTORY>                                              2,692,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         3,205,000
<PP&E>                                                   1,117,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                             341,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           5,159,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    1,110,000
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                603,000
<COMMON>                                                13,908,000
<OTHER-SE>                                             (12,403,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             5,159,000
<SALES>                                                    905,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           905,000
<CGS>                                                      486,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              486,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           597,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          80,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           (258,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       (258,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                              (258,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                  (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                (0.04)


</TABLE>
#### Semotuk v. Kansas Dept. of Corrections

109,436

12/27/13

Denied

Unpublished
# C_2018400EN.01001401.xml

| 6.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 400/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 400/14

---

Commission Communication in the framework of the implementation of Directive 2014/68/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to the making available on the market of pressure equipment

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 400/08)

According to the provisions of Article 15, paragraph 4, of Directive 2014/68/EU the reference of the following European Approval for Materials (EAM) is published:

| Number | Short name | Full title |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 0879-1:2001/05 | EAM Nickel 201-1 | EAM Nickel 201 — Hot and cold rolled plates, sheets and strips (pure nickel with low carbon for pressure equipment) |
| 0879-2:2001/05 | EAM Nickel 201-2 | EAM Nickel 201 — Forgings (pure nickel with low carbon for pressure equipment) |
| 0879-3:2001/05 | EAM Nickel 201-3 | EAM Nickel 201 — Bars (pure nickel with low carbon for pressure equipment) |
| 0879-4:2001/05 | EAM Nickel 201-4 | EAM Nickel 201 — Seamless Tubes (pure nickel with low carbon for pressure equipment) |

Number

Short name

Full title

0879-1:2001/05

EAM Nickel 201-1

EAM Nickel 201 — Hot and cold rolled plates, sheets and strips (pure nickel with low carbon for pressure equipment)

0879-2:2001/05

EAM Nickel 201-2

EAM Nickel 201 — Forgings (pure nickel with low carbon for pressure equipment)

0879-3:2001/05

EAM Nickel 201-3

EAM Nickel 201 — Bars (pure nickel with low carbon for pressure equipment)

0879-4:2001/05

EAM Nickel 201-4

EAM Nickel 201 — Seamless Tubes (pure nickel with low carbon for pressure equipment)

Note:

Original copies of this European Approval for Materials may be obtained from TÜV UK LIMITED, AMP House Suites 27-29 Fifth Floor Dingwall Road, Croydon CR0 2LX, United Kingdom Tel. +44 2086807711, Fax +44 2086804035, Email: enquiries.uk@tuv-nord.co.uk. An administration charge of EUR 80 is payable with the order. The document is also available for free download from the companies' website.

---
# C_2018413EN.01000503.xml

| 14.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 413/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 413/5

---

EUROPEAN CHEMICALS AGENCY

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2017

(2018/C 413/18)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

https://www.echa.europa.eu/web/guest/about-us/the-way-we-work/financial-management-and-budgetary-reporting/2017

---
April 9, 2010

Dear Pellet Appliance Manufacturers:

As you are aware, the EPA has begun to review their 22 year-old New Source Performance Standard (NSPS), which regulates the production, sale , and importation of all residential wood burning applian ces in the U.S. EPA has stated that it is its intent to bring all pellet burning applia nces-- room heaters, boile rs and furnaces-- into this program. EPA has also stated that it exp ects that appliance manufacturers will only allow the use of fuel in their app liances that meet a generall y accepted standard for fuel consistency, such as the proposed Pellet Fuel Institute (PFI) fuel standards. EPA also made it clear that manufactures would be expect ed to test with the lowest grade of fuel that they expect to be burn ed in their appliances.

Following extensive consultations with EPA during the recent PFI Board of Directors’ meeting in Orlando, the PFI Standards Comm ittee is reviewing the proposed standards program and soliciting input from Pellet Appliance Manufacturer s, such as your

company.

This information will be integrat ed into the input we receive fr om a similar survey sent to

fuel manufacturers, as the St andards Committee considers if any adjustments need to be

made to either the standard, or th e process of adopting the standard.

The PFI standard can be found here [link to : http://pelletheat.org/2/Standa rdSpecificationWithCopyright%20.pdf ] and we encourage you to pay particular attention to page three [ link to Table 1], the sp ecifications sheet for

the standard.

While currently there are four grades of fuel in this program, the first two grades, PFI Super Premium and PFI Premium, will be the most relevant grades for the residential fuel market, and we direct your attention to the two left columns. As you can see, the percentage of Inorganic Ash is the principl e distinction between the PFI Super Premium, and Premium grades.

The Standards Committee is especially interest ed in your input with regards to these key questions:

1. Are .5% and 1% ash the appropri ate ‘cut points’ for ash content?

2. The proposed ISO Standard uses .7% and 1.5%, ash content. Could these ‘cut points’

be used in North America? How w ould 1.5% ash affect your appliance?3. Do you know the typical temperature range in your burn pot? If you had access to the typical ash fusion temperatures would it influence your design?

4. Besides ash %, are their other key paramete rs that a fuel standa rd should address?

We encourage you to provide your feedback to us via fax (703-522-0548) or you may simply reply to this email. We will use your feedback to help us look at the current standard and determine what changes should be made to the program in order to meet EPA’s requirements for NSPS.

Please return all responses to us no later than Friday, April 30 th . We look forward to hearing from you and thank you in advance for your assistance in this crucial matter.

Sincerely,

Jeff Thiessen

President
# m94_59b