alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| | Paper (26)All (20-39)Food (20)Textiles (22)Apparel (23)Lumber (24)Furniture (25)Printing (27)Chemicals (28)Refineries (29)Rubber (30)Stone, Clay & Glass(32)Primary Metals (33)Fabricated Metals (34)Machinery (35)Electronic Equipment (36)Instruments (38)Miscellaneous Manufacturing (39)
    This major group includes establishments primarily engaged in the manufacture of pulps from
    wood and other cellulose fibers, and from rags; the manufacture of paper and paperboard;
    and the manufacture of paper and paperboard into converted products, such as paper coated
    off the paper machine, paper bags, paper boxes, and envelopes.If you found this information useful,
    please try...Energy
        Consumption
      Use of
        Energy
      Electricity
      Manufacturing
        Floorspace
      Prices
      Energy
        Storage
      Energy and
        Operating Ratios
      Energy-Management
        Activities
      Technology
      Fuel-Switching
        Capability
      Motors | Figure on  ratio of energy consumed per 1992 constant dollar for SIC 26***Source: Table 12 of this
    report.***Figure on energy consumed by quadrillion Btu for SIC 26***Sources: Energy Information Administration, 1985, 1988, 1991,
    and 1994 MECS.***
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

arrow to top of pageTop
of Pagearrow to previous pageEnergy
Intensity Page



File Last Modified: 8/25/98

Contact:
  robert.adler@eia.doe.gov
  Robert Adler
  MECS Survey Manager
  Phone: (202) 586-1134
  Fax: (202) 586-0018

mark.schipper@eia.doe.gov
  Mark Schipper
  Phone: (202) 586-1136
  Fax: (202) 586-0018

http://www.eia.gov/emeu/mecs/mecs94/ei/**ei_26.html**Separater LineIf you are having any technical
problems with this site, please contact the EIA Webmaster at wmaster@eia.doe.gov Separater Line
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 10, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00131

- CV

Lorraine KENYON , Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of Theodore Kenyon

, Appellants

v.

ELEPHANT INSURANCE COMPANY, LLC

,

Appellees

From the 224th Judici al District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CI14055

Honorable Michael E. Mery, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant’s reply brief was due October 29, 2018. Appellant filed an untimely reply brief

on November 26, 2018. Appellant now files an unopposed motion for extension of time to file

her reply brief by an additional 28 days, until November 26, 2018, and requests that her reply

brief filed on November 26, 2018 be considered timely. Appellant’s motion is GRANTED

. Appellant’s reply brief filed on November 26, 2018 is deemed timely as filed.

It is so ORDERED on December 10, 2018.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

__________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

, Clerk of Court
#### State v. Pendleton

106,747

10/07/13

Denied.

Unpublished
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 3 

Fixing the hour of daily meeting of the Senate. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 6, 2009 

Mr. REID (for himself and Mr. MCCONNELL) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Fixing the hour of daily meeting of the Senate. 

1 Resolved, That the daily meeting of the Senate be 12 

2 o’clock meridian unless otherwise ordered. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 21

- 00460

- CR

Andon Joseph SAMBRANO

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 452nd District Court

, Kimble County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020

- DCR

- 1025

Honorable Robert Rey Hofmann , Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARTINEZ

, JUSTICE RIOS , AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED February 22, 2023

.

_____________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice
# C_2018437EN.01000201.xml

| 4.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 437/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 437/2

---

Notice for the attention of the persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/72/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 101/2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Tunisia

(2018/C 437/02)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons that appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2011/72/CFSP (1), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 101/2011 (2), concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Tunisia.

The Council intends to renew the restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2011/72/CFSP. The Council holds on its file new elements concerning all persons listed in the Annex to Decision 2011/72/CFSP and in Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 101/2011. The persons concerned are hereby informed that they may submit a request to the Council to obtain the information that relates to them, before 13 December 2018, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| RELEX.1.C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

RELEX.1.C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

Any observations received will be taken into account for the purpose of the Council’s periodic review, in accordance with Article 5 of Decision 2011/72/CFSP and Article 12(4) of Regulation (EU) No 101/2011.

---

(1)  OJ L 28, 2.2.2011, p. 62.

(2)  OJ L 31, 5.2.2011, p. 1.

---
#### STATE OF CONNECTICUT *v.*JOSEPH ANCONA

(AC 33946)

Gruendel, Bear and Sheldon, Js.

Argued April 25

officially released May 14, 2013

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Jonathan Trujillo, Appellant

No. 06-13-00041-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 8th District Court of 

Hopkins County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 

0921175). Memorandum Opinion 

delivered by Justice Carter, Chief Justice 

Morriss and Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Jonathan Trujillo, has adequately indicated his inability to pay 

costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED DECEMBER 31, 2013

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    Exhibit 23-1
                                                                     Page 1 of 2


                    Consent of Independent Public Accountants


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 2-94678), as amended October 18, 1994, pertaining to
the Employee Retirement Savings Account Plan of Savannah Foods & Industries,
Inc., of our report dated November 17, 1997, appearing on page 15 of this Form
10-K.

ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
December 12, 1997


                                      76

<PAGE>   2
                                                                    Exhibit 23-1
                                                                     Page 2 of 2


                       Consent of Independent Accountants

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 2-94678), as amended October 18, 1994, pertaining to
the Employee Retirement Savings Account Plan of Savannah Foods & Industries,
Inc., of our report dated November 18, 1996, appearing on page 16 of this Form
10-K.

PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
December 12, 1997

                                      77
# C_2018174EN.01000401.xml

| 23.5.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 174/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.5.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 174/4

---

Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)

(Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006
   (1)
  )

(Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006

1

)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 174/05)

Decisions granting an authorisation

Decisions granting an authorisation

| Reference of the decision (2) | Date of decision | Substance name | Holder of the authorisation | Authorisation numbers | Authorised use | Date of expiry of review period | Reasons for the decision |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| C(2018) 2806 | 16 May 2018 | Bis(2-methoxyethyl) ether
  (diglyme)
  EC No: 203-924-4
  CAS No 111-96-6 | Bracco Imaging SpA, Via Folli 50, 20134, Milan, Italy | REACH/18/8/0 | Use of diglyme as a processing aid in the purification of 5-amino-2,4,6-triiodoisophthalic acid (EC No 417-220-1; CAS No 37441-29-5) dichloride by precipitation | 22 August 2029 | Risk is adequately controlled in accordance with Article 60(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006.
  There are no suitable alternatives before the sunset date |

Reference of the decision (2)

2

Date of decision

Substance name

Holder of the authorisation

Authorisation numbers

Authorised use

Date of expiry of review period

Reasons for the decision

C(2018) 2806

16 May 2018

Bis(2-methoxyethyl) ether

(diglyme)

EC No: 203-924-4

CAS No 111-96-6

Bracco Imaging SpA, Via Folli 50, 20134, Milan, Italy

REACH/18/8/0

Use of diglyme as a processing aid in the purification of 5-amino-2,4,6-triiodoisophthalic acid (EC No 417-220-1; CAS No 37441-29-5) dichloride by precipitation

22 August 2029

Risk is adequately controlled in accordance with Article 60(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006.

There are no suitable alternatives before the sunset date

---

(1)  OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1.

1

(2)  The decision is available on the European Commission website at: http://ec.europa.eu/growth/sectors/chemicals/reach/about/index_en.htm

2

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-6894
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus LEROY DUNHAM, JR., Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson Everett Legg, Chief District Judge. (1:95-cr-00234-BEL) Submitted: November 21, 2006 De cided: November 29, 2006 Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Leroy Dunham, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Arcangelo Michael Tuminelli, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Leroy Dunham, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582 (West 2000 & Supp. 2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Dunham , No. 1:95-cr-00234-BEL (D. Md. Apr. 18, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2018413EN.01000904.xml

| 14.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 413/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 413/9

---

EUROPEAN UNION AGENCY FOR FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2017

(2018/C 413/35)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

http://fra.europa.eu/en/about-fra/finance-and-budget/financial-documents

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

DIANE ZILKA,

Petitioner

v.

TAX REVIEW BOARD CITY OF

PHILADELPHIA,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 31 EAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court

DIANE ZILKA,

Petitioner

v.

TAX REVIEW BOARD CITY OF

PHILADELPHIA,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 32 EAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 5th day of July, 2022

, the Application for Leave to File a Post

Submission Communication is DENIED . The Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

GRANTED . The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

(1) Petitioner, a Philadelphia resident who worked in Wilmington, Delaware, was subject to Pennsylvania Personal Income Tax (“PIT”), Philadelphia City Wage Tax (“Wage Tax”), Delaware Income Tax (“DIT”) and Wilmington Earnings Tax[ 31 EAL 2022 and 32 EAL 2022 ]

- 2

(“Wilmington Tax”). Pennsylvania allowed Petitioner to credit DIT paid against her PIT liability. The City of Philadelphia (“City”) allowed Petitioner to credit Wilmington Tax paid against her Wage Tax liability. DIT Petitioner paid exceeded the PIT credit

she was allo wed (“Unapplied Credit”). The City did not allow Petitioner to apply the Unapplied Credit against the Wage Tax. The U.S. Supreme Court held the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution dictates that taxing jurisdictions must grant their residents a credit for state and local income taxes paid to other state and local taxing jurisdictions . Comptroller of Maryland v. Wynne , 135 S. Ct. 1787 (2015) (“Wynne”). Did the Commonwealth Court err, as a matter of law, where it held it was constitutional for the City no t to apply Petitioner’s Unapplied Credit against her Wage Tax liability?

Justice Brobson did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
No. 12-5979.

#### Ortiz *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certio-rari denied.
#### Priest v. Pryor

111,736

07/27/2015

Denied. ,.

Unpublished
# C_2018167EN.01000301.xml

| 15.5.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 167/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.5.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 167/3

---

Notice for the attention of the persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2018/706, and in Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/705 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

(2018/C 167/03)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons that appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP (1), as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2018/706 (2), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 (3), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/705 (4) concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine.

1

2

3

4

The Council of the European Union has decided that the persons that appear in the above-mentioned Annexes should be included in the list of persons subject to restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2014/145/CFSP and in Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. The grounds for designations of those persons appear in the relevant entries in those Annexes.

The attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated in the web sites in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 269/2014, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 4 of the Regulation).

The persons concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned list should be reconsidered, to the following address before 1 June 2018:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The attention of the persons concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council’s decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 16.

1

(2)  OJ L 118 I, 14.5.2018, p. 3.

2

(3)  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 6.

3

(4)  OJ L 118 I, 14.5.2018, p. 1.

4

---
No. 12-5593.

#### Boyd *v.*Angelica Textile Services, Inc.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 12-5977.

#### Brewer *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### M West, Inc. v. Oak Park Mall

106,931

08/23/13

Denied.

Unpublished
Exhibit
        32.2
  CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
  In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of International Automated Systems,
        Inc.
        (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal period ending September 30, 2005,
        as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
        “Report”), I, LaGrand T. Johnson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
        certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
        906
        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
        belief:
  (1) the
        Report
        fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
        Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2) the
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/
        LaGrand T.
        Johnson
 
 LaGrand
        T. Johnson
 Chief
        Financial Officer
 
 November
        21, 2005
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 53 

Authorizing a plaque commemorating the role of enslaved African Americans 

in the construction of the Capitol. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 24, 2009 

Mrs. LINCOLN (for herself, Mr. SCHUMER, Mr. CHAMBLISS, and Mr. BENNETT) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration 

FEBRUARY 25, 2009 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Authorizing a plaque commemorating the role of enslaved 

African Americans in the construction of the Capitol. 

Whereas enslaved African Americans provided labor essential 

to the construction of the Capitol; 

Whereas enslaved African Americans performed the backbreaking work of quarrying the stone which comprised 

many of the floors, walls, and columns of the Capitol; 

Whereas enslaved African Americans toiled in the Aquia 

Creek sandstone quarry in Stafford County, Virginia and 

in a marble quarry in Montgomery County, Maryland to 

produce the stone that would be used in the Capitol; 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 53 ATS 

Whereas the marble columns in the Old Senate Chamber and 

the sandstone walls of the East Front corridor remain as 

the lasting legacies of the enslaved African Americans 

who worked the quarries; 

Whereas enslaved African Americans also participated in 

other facets of construction of the Capitol, including carpentry, masonry, carting, rafting, roofing, plastering, 

glazing, painting, and sawing; 

Whereas enslaved African Americans labored on the Nation’s 

Capitol while they, themselves, were not free; 

Whereas the contributions of enslaved African Americans in 

the construction of the Capitol have not been acknowledged nor adequately represented in the Capitol; 

Whereas no narrative on the construction of the Capitol that 

does not include the contributions of enslaved African 

Americans can fully and accurately reflect the history of 

the Capitol; and 

Whereas recognition of the contributions of enslaved African 

Americans brings to all people of the United States an 

understanding of the continuing evolution of democracy: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate authorizes and directs— 

2 (1) the Senate Commission on Art to procure 

3 an appropriate plaque acknowledging the role of 

4 enslaved African Americans in the construction of 

5 the Capitol; and 

6 (2) that, under the direction of the Committee 

7 on Rules and Administration of the Senate, the 

8 plaque shall be placed near the original exterior wall 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
3 

•SRES 53 ATS 

1 that was constructed between 1793 and 1800 in the 

2 East Front corridor on the third floor of the Senate 

3 wing of the Capitol. 

Æ 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS