alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 65 (Friday, April 4, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 16150]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-8576]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. CP97-308-000]


Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation; Notice of Request 
Under Blanket Authorization

March 31, 1997.
    Take notice that on March 26, 1997, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line 
Corporation (Transco), P.O. Box 1396, Houston, Texas 77251, filed in 
Docket No. CP97-308-000 a request pursuant to Sections 157.205 and 
157.211 of the Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 
CFR 157.211) for authorization to construct and operate a sales tap for 
an existing industrial chemical facility located in St. James Parish, 
Louisiana, under TGPL's blanket certificate issued in Docket No. CP82-
426-000 pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act, all as more fully 
set forth in the request that is on file with the Commission and open 
to public inspection
    Transco states that the new sales tap will be used by Occidental 
Chemical Corporation (Occidental) for chemical manufacturing plant 
operations. Transco proposes to construct, install, own and operate the 
new sales tap and associated pipeline facilities consisting of a 6-inch 
hot tap near the 4.04 milepost on Transco's existing 12-inch Hester 
Lateral, a dual 2-inch meter run and 750 of associated pipeline. 
Transco states that Occidental will construct, or cause to be 
constructed, appurtenant facilities to enable it to receive up to 8,000 
Mcf of gas per day from Transco on an interruptible basis. Transco 
states that the proposed facilities are estimated at $165,000 and that 
Occidental will cause Transco to be reimbursed for all costs associated 
with the facilities.
    Transco states that the new sales tap is not prohibited by its 
existing tariff and that it has sufficient capacity to accomplish 
deliveries without detriment or disadvantage to other customers. The 
new sales tap will not have an effect on Transco's peak day and annual 
deliveries and the total volumes delivered will not exceed total 
volumes authorized prior to this request.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of 
the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, 
the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-8576 Filed 4-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Presidential Documents

14771

Federal Register

Vol. 62, No. 59

Thursday, March 27, 1997

Title 3—

The President

Proclamation 6979 of March 25, 1997

Greek Independence Day: A National Day of Celebration of

Greek and American Democracy, 1997

By the President of the United States of America

A Proclamation

Today, the Greek people and the Hellenic Republic will celebrate the 176th

anniversary of the beginning of their struggle for independence.

On this day, it is fitting that we reflect on the enormous contributions

the Greek people have made to the modern world. The legacy of the ancient

Greeks, in the fields of philosophy, literature, drama, sculpture, and architecture, continues to influence our beliefs, our values, and our concept of

art. And, after more than 2,000 years, the ideology of Greece—as embodied

in the concept of democracy—is still the ideal that guides us in charting

our course for the future.

Greek ideology had a profound effect on our Founding Fathers, who molded

the American form of government based upon the principles of Greek democracy. Thomas Jefferson studied the Greek classics in his youth and was

inspired by their philosophy throughout his life, most dramatically when

he crafted the Declaration of Independence. When formulating his vision

for this country, Jefferson specifically referred to the integrated assertions,

theories, and aims of the classic Greek world.

Our admiration for Greece continues into the modern day, and we salute

its commitment to democracy, to peace, and to a united and stable Europe.

We share a partnership with Greece in NATO, and our countries are linked

forever by close family relationships between our peoples. Our Nation looks

forward to working closely with Greece in the coming years as we examine

ways to bring full peace, stability, and prosperity to all the nations of

Europe and the world.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, WILLIAM J. CLINTON, President of the United States

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution

and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim March 25, 1997, as

Greek Independence Day: A National Day of Celebration of Greek and American Democracy. I call upon all Americans to observe this day with appropriate ceremonies, activities, and programs.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-fifth

day of March, in the year of our Lord nineteen hundred and ninety-seven,

and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred

[FR Doc. 97–8065

Filed 3–26–97; 11:34 am]

and twenty-first.

œ–

Billing code 3195–01–P
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 9 (Tuesday, January 14, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 1901]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-797]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act

    Notice is hereby given that a proposed consent decree in United 
States v. Janet Schusheim, et al., Civil Action No. 97-0019, was lodged 
on January 2, 1997 with the United States District Court for the 
Eastern District of New York. Defendant Janet Schusheim was the former 
owner of the property comprising the SMS Instruments, Inc. Superfund 
Site (``Site'') in Deer Park, New York at the time wastes containing 
hazardous substances were disposed of at the Site. Defendant 120 Realty 
Corp. is the current owner of the Site property.
    Under the terms of the proposed decree, defendants will pay the 
United States $290,000 for certain past response costs incurred by the 
United States for remedial action work involving air and steam 
stripping of contaminated soil and groundwater extraction, treatment, 
and reinjection. The proposed decree includes a covenant not to sue by 
the United States under Sections 106 and 107 of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 
Secs. 9601 et seq.
    The Department of Justice will receive, for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication, comments relating to the 
proposes consent decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant 
Attorney General for the Environment and Natural Resources Division, 
Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20530, and should refer to 
United States v. Janet Schusheim, et al. D.J. reference #90-11-2-1123A.
    The proposed consent decree may be examined at the Office of the 
United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, 225 Cadman 
Plaza East, Brooklyn; New York, the Region II, Office of the 
Environmental Protection Agency, 290 Broadway, New York, New York; and 
at the Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street, N.W. 4th floor, 
Washington, D.C. 2005, (202) 624-0892. A copy of the proposed consent 
decree may be obtained in person or by mail from the Consent Decree 
Library, 1120 G Street, N.W. 4th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20005. In 
requesting a copy please enclose a check in the amount of $7.25 (25 
cents per page reproduction costs), payable to the Consent Decree 
Library.
Joel M. Gross,
Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural 
Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 97-797 Filed 1-13-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
Exhibit 99.2

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Multi-Color Corporation, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the periodending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dawn H. Bertsche, Vice-President Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

| 1)     |   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                 |
| 2)     |   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|                              |   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|------------------------------|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: February 14, 2003 |   |   | By: /s/ DAWN H. BERTSCHE                                   |
|                         |   |   | **Dawn H. Bertsche****Vice-President Finance,****Chief Financial Officer**                                                                                                                                                                |

** **
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ THERESE C. MASSON, Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

SELENE FINANCE, LP, US BANK TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION ( as Trustee for SRMOF REO 2011

- 1 Trust ), SELENE RMOF LLC ( Sole Ce rtificate Holder of SRMOF 2009

- 1 Trust ) , AND

SELENE RMOF REO ACQU ISITION LLC, Defendants

- Appellees.

______________________

2013

- 1447

______________________

A ppeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 12

- CV

- 5335, Judge Samuel Conti.

______________________ Before N EWMAN , P ROST , and R EYNA , Circuit Judges

. P ER C URIAM

. O R D E R
This court considers whether this appeal should be dismissed.

Therese Mas s on appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California dismissing her claim under the Federal Fair Case: 13-1447 Document: 3 Page: 1 Filed: 11/22/2013MASSON v. SELENE FINANCE , LP 2

Debt Collection Practice Act. Her appeal was docketed at this court and the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
On July 1, 2013, this court issued an order informing the parties that this court did not have jurisdiction over Mas s on’s appeal and directed the parties to respond as to whether the appeal should be dismissed in light of the fact that it was already properly docketed in the Ninth Circuit. Having received no response to this court’s July 1, 2013 order, the court now dismisses the appeal.
Accordingly,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT : (1) The appeal is dismissed

. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs

.

F OR THE C OURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: November 22, 2013

s19 Case: 13-1447 Document: 3 Page: 2 Filed: 11/22/2013
# mecs29a
# Table 10.11

# RSE 10.11

# Microsoft_Word_Document1.docx

# image1.emf

# Microsoft_Word_Document2.docx

# image2.emf
# C_2018029EN.01000201.xml

| 26.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 29/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 29/2

---

EU list of non-cooperative jurisdictions for tax purposes

(2018/C 29/03)

With effect from the day of publication in the Official Journal of the European Union, the Council conclusions of 5 December 2017 on the EU list of non-cooperative jurisdictions for tax purposes (1) are amended as follows:

Official Journal of the European Union

1

In Annex I:

In Annex I:

Points 3 (Barbados), 4 (Grenada), 6 (Korea (Republic of)), 7 (Macao SAR), 9 (Mongolia), 12 (Panama), 16 (Tunisia) and 17 (United Arab Emirates) are deleted.

In Annex II:

In Annex II:

| 1. | Barbados is added to section 2.1 (sub-section 1). |
| --- | --- |

1.

Barbados is added to section 2.1 (sub-section 1).

| 2. | Grenada is added to sections 1.1 (sub-section 1), 1.3 (sub-section 1), 2.1 (sub-section 1) and 3 (sub-section 1). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Grenada is added to sections 1.1 (sub-section 1), 1.3 (sub-section 1), 2.1 (sub-section 1) and 3 (sub-section 1).

| 3. | Korea (Republic of) is added to section 2.1 (sub-section 1). |
| --- | --- |

3.

Korea (Republic of) is added to section 2.1 (sub-section 1).

| 4. | Macao SAR is added to sections 1.1 (sub-section 1), 1.3 (sub-section 1) and 2.1 (sub-section 1). |
| --- | --- |

4.

Macao SAR is added to sections 1.1 (sub-section 1), 1.3 (sub-section 1) and 2.1 (sub-section 1).

| 5. | Mongolia is added to sections 1.2 (sub-section 2) and 1.3 (sub-section 2). |
| --- | --- |

5.

Mongolia is added to sections 1.2 (sub-section 2) and 1.3 (sub-section 2).

| 6. | Panama is added to section 2.1 (sub-section 1). |
| --- | --- |

6.

Panama is added to section 2.1 (sub-section 1).

| 7. | Tunisia is added to section 2.1 (sub-section 1). |
| --- | --- |

7.

Tunisia is added to section 2.1 (sub-section 1).

| 8. | The United Arab Emirates is added to sections 1.1 (sub-section 1), 1.3 (sub-section 1) and 3 (sub-section 1). |
| --- | --- |

8.

The United Arab Emirates is added to sections 1.1 (sub-section 1), 1.3 (sub-section 1) and 3 (sub-section 1).

---

(1)  OJ C 438, 19.12.2017 p. 5.

1

---
# Table 8.9

# RSE 8.9
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We  consent  to  the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
SBE,  Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 33-42629) of our report dated November 23, 1999
on  our  audits of the consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedule  of the Company as of October 31, 1999 and 1998 and for the years ended
October  31,  1999,  1998 and 1997, which report is included in this 1999 Annual
Report  on  Form  10-K.

PricewaterhouseCoopers  LLP

San  Francisco,  California
January  27,  2000

                                     44
Exhibit 11.1

Statement Regarding Computation

of Net Income Per Share





Three months 
         ended June 30,
Six months 
ended June 30,2002

2001
2002
2001Net income
$
1,017,000
$
610,000
$
1,866,000
$
1,048,000Basic net income per share:Weighted-average shares outstanding

1,864,909

1,975,723

1,893,034

1,976,372Net income per share
$
.55
$
.31
$
.99
$
.71Diluted net income per share:Weighted-average common sharesoutstanding and common share equivalents

1,870,622

1,975,723

1,897,039

1,976,372Net income per share
$
.54
$
.31
$
.98
$
.71
# File Information

A20 - Average per Vehicles

Std Errors for A20

N Cells for A20

# A20 - Average per Vehicles

# Std Errors for A20

# N Cells for A20
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                             744
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,209
<ALLOWANCES>                                       214
<INVENTORY>                                      4,126
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,779
<PP&E>                                          12,053
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,550
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  21,639
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,407
<BONDS>                                          2,181
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           190
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,492
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    21,639
<SALES>                                          5,722
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,722
<CGS>                                            3,975
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,975
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    38
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  96
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     98
<INCOME-TAX>                                        39
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 59
<DISCONTINUED>                                     159
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       218
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08


</TABLE>
#### Sharp v. Kansas Dept. for Children & Families

110,504

08/30/2016

Denied.

Unpublished
# C_2018308EN.01000701.xml

| 31.8.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 308/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.8.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 308/7

---

Corrigendum to Passenger Name Records (PNR)

List of Member States who have decided the application of the PNR Directive to intra-EU flights

As referred to in Article 2 of Directive (EU) 2016/681 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the use of passenger name record (PNR) data for the prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of terrorist offences and serious crime

(If a Member State decides to apply this Directive to intra-EU flights, it shall notify the Commission in writing. A Member State may give or revoke such a notification at any time. The Commission shall publish that notification and any revocation of it in the Official Journal of the European Union)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 196 of 8 June 2018
  )

(2018/C 308/07)

On page 29:

The following Member State that has notified the Commission of the application of the PNR Directive in intra-EU flights is added:

| — | Luxembourg |
| --- | --- |

—

Luxembourg

---
# C_2018413EN.01001203.xml

| 14.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 413/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 413/12

---

SESAR JOINT UNDERTAKING

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2017

(2018/C 413/46)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

https://www.sesarju.eu/sites/default/files/documents/reports/SJU%20Annual%20Accounts%202017.pdf

---
# Table 8.8

# RSE 8.8

# Microsoft_Word_Document1.docx

# image1.emf

# Microsoft_Word_Document2.docx

# image2.emf
Opinion issued October 3, 2023

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-22-00509-CV

———————————

IN RE NO LIMIT CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, LLC, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, No Limit Construction Services, LLC, has filed a petition for writ of 

mandamus challenging (1) the trial court’s order granting partial summary judgment 

on real party in interest’s sworn-account claim and (2) the trial court’s order denying 
2

relator’s motion to reconsider and vacate the summary judgment order.1 We deny 

the petition and lift the stay imposed by our September 21, 2023 order.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Goodman, Rivas-Molloy, and Guerra.

1 The underlying case is JAM Materials, LLC v. No Limit Construction 

Services, LLC, cause number 2021-27906, pending in the 113th District Court

of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Rabeea Sultan Collier presiding.
# C_2022198EN.01002402.xml

| 16.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 198/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 198/24

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo (Portugal) lodged on 11 February 2022 — Companhia de Distribuição Integral Logística Portugal, S.A. v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira

(Case C-96/22)

(2022/C 198/35)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Supremo Tribunal Administrativo

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Companhia de Distribuição Integral Logística Portugal, S.A.

Respondent: Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira

Questions referred

| 1. | Do the quantitative limits on the release for consumption established by Article 106 of the Código dos Impostos Especiais do Consumo (Excise Duty Code, ‘the CIEC’) constitute quantitative restrictions on imports or measures having equivalent effect within the meaning of Article 34 TFEU, in so far as Article 106 stipulates that, during the last four months of each year, the quantities of cigarettes sold by operators may not exceed the average monthly quantity of cigarettes released for consumption in the 12 months immediately preceding? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Do the quantitative limits on the release for consumption established by Article 106 of the Código dos Impostos Especiais do Consumo (Excise Duty Code, ‘the CIEC’) constitute quantitative restrictions on imports or measures having equivalent effect within the meaning of Article 34 TFEU, in so far as Article 106 stipulates that, during the last four months of each year, the quantities of cigarettes sold by operators may not exceed the average monthly quantity of cigarettes released for consumption in the 12 months immediately preceding?

| 2. | Is it contrary to the rules on the chargeability of excise duty established by Articles 7 and 9 of Council Directive 2008/118/EC (1) of 16 December 2008 to levy tax on any quantities of cigarettes that exceed the quantitative limit on the release for consumption established under Article 106(2) of the CIEC at the rate applicable on the date on which the declaration of discharge is lodged, in accordance with Article 106(7) of the CIEC? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Is it contrary to the rules on the chargeability of excise duty established by Articles 7 and 9 of Council Directive 2008/118/EC (1) of 16 December 2008 to levy tax on any quantities of cigarettes that exceed the quantitative limit on the release for consumption established under Article 106(2) of the CIEC at the rate applicable on the date on which the declaration of discharge is lodged, in accordance with Article 106(7) of the CIEC?

---

(1)  Council Directive 2008/118/EC of 16 December 2008 concerning the general arrangements for excise duty and repealing Directive 92/12/EEC (OJ 2009 L 9, p. 12).

---