alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
        32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
  In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of International Automated Systems,
        Inc.
        (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006, as
        filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
        “Report”), I, Neldon Johnson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
        pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
        the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
        belief:
 
 
 (1)
              the
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
 
 
 (2)
              the
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                  Company.
 
 
 
 
 /s/
        Neldon
        Johnson
 
 Neldon
        Johnson
 Chief
        Executive Officer
  November
        20, 2006
Exhibit 32

The following statement is being made to the Securities and Exchange Commission solely for the purposes of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), which carries with it
certain criminal penalties in the event of a knowing or willful misrepresentation.

Securities and Exchange Commission

450 Fifth Street NW

Washington, D.C. 20549



| | Re: | Perrigo Company
| | --- | ---------------

Ladies and Gentlemen:

In accordance with the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), each of the
undersigned hereby certifies that:



| | (i) | this Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (ii) | the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Perrigo Company.
| | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated as of this 2nd day of November, 2009.



|                                                |  |  |  |                                                     
|----------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|                                                |  | 
|/s/ Joseph C. Papa                              |  |  |  | /s/ Judy L. Brown                                   
|Joseph C. Papa                                  |  |  |  | Judy L. Brown                                       
|Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



- 50 -
No. 11-11151.

#### Smith *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1



                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                        18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
              SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Santa Fe Financial Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I John V. Winfield, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
    15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Company.


Date: September 29, 2003                        /s/ John V. Winfield
                                                ----------------------------
                                                John V. Winfield, President
                                                and Chief Executive Officer




[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Santa Fe Financial Corporation and will be retained by Santa Fe
Financial Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.]
#### Kansas Bldg. Industry Work. Comp. Fund v. State

108,607

12/27/13

Granted

49 Kan. App. 2d 354
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2
 
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
                        -------------------------------



The Board of Trustees
The Rouse Company Incentive Compensation Statutory Trust
and
The Board of Directors
The Rouse Company:

   We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
of The Rouse Company on Form S-3 (File Nos. 2-78898, 2-95596, 33-52458, 33-57707
and 333-67137), Form S-8 (File Nos. 2-83612, 33-56231, 33-56233, 33-56235 and
333-32277) and Form S-4 (File No. 333-01693) of our report dated February 24,
1999, relating to the combined consolidated financial statements and related
schedules of Real Estate Ventures owned by The Rouse Company Incentive
Compensation Statutory Trust and The Rouse Company as of and for the year ended
December 31, 1998, which report appears in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of The
Rouse Company for the year ended December 31, 1998.



                                                  KPMG LLP



Baltimore, Maryland
March 30, 1999
##### 



ARI / ARL RENT AND BUILDING SERVICES  EXTENSION AGREEMENT
 Extension Agreement ARI ARL Effective Date
  Transitional Services Agreement
 Separation
Agreement
     Definitions
 Rent and Building Services Extension
 -1-




---



##### 



Entire Agreement; Modification and Waiver
 Communications
  
  
 -2-




---



##### 



provided however
 Counterparts
  -3-




---



##### 



AMERICAN RAILCAR LEASING LLCBy:

/s/
Harry L. McKinstryName:
    H.L.
McKinstryTitle:
    V.P.
Finance - ControllerAMERICAN RAILCAR INDUSTRIES, INC.By:

/s/
James CowanName:
    James
CowanTitle:

Executive
Vice President and COO 
 ST. CHARLES PROPERTIES, a Missouri partnershipBy:

/s/
James J. UngerName:
    James
J. UngerTitle:
    General
Partner -4-
# Table 10.10

# RSE 10.10
Argued and submitted January 30,

affirmed April 5,

petition for review denied August 3, 2017 (361 Or 800)

#### In the Matter of M. T. U., a Child. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, *Petitioner-Respondent, v.*R. F., aka A. U., *Appellant.*

Marion County Circuit Court

15JU03763; A163030

391 P3d 993

Tiffany Keast argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Inge D. Wells, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, and Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General.

Before Duncan, Presiding Judge, and DeVore, Judge, and Garrett, Judge.

*670PER CURIAM

In this dependency case, mother appeals a juvenile court judgment terminating her parental rights to her daughter on the ground of unfitness, ORS 419B.504. We reject without written discussion mother’s first assignment of error. In her second assignment of error, mother contends that the juvenile court erred in terminating her parental rights because the Department of Human Services (DHS) failed to establish by clear and convincing evidence that she is presently unfit to parent by reason of “conduct or condition seriously detrimental to the child,” that integration of the child into mother’s care is improbable within a reasonable time due to conduct or conditions not likely to change, and that termination is in the best interests of the child. ORS 419B.504; ORS 419B.500.

A discussion of the facts of this case would not benefit the bench, the bar, or the public. On *de novo*review, ORS 19.415(3)(a), we conclude that the juvenile court properly terminated mother’s parental rights for unfitness under ORS 419B.504 and that termination is in the best interests of the child.

Affirmed.
# C_2018430EN.01000301.xml

| 29.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 430/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 430/3

---

Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EU) 2016/44 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya apply

(2018/C 430/03)

The attention of data subjects is drawn to the following information in accordance with Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1):

The legal basis for this processing operation is Council Regulation (EU) 2016/44 (2).

The controller of this processing operation is the Council of the European Union represented by the Director-General of RELEX (Foreign Affairs, Enlargement, Civil Protection) of the General Secretariat of the Council and the department entrusted with the processing operation is RELEX.1.C that can be contacted at:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| RELEX.1.C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

RELEX.1.C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The purpose of the processing operation is the establishment and updating of the list of persons subject to restrictive measures in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2016/44.

The data subjects are the natural persons who fulfil the listing criteria as laid down in that Regulation.

The personal data collected includes data necessary for the correct identification of the person concerned, the statement of reasons and any other data related thereto.

The personal data collected may be shared as necessary with the European External Action Service and the Commission.

Without prejudice to restrictions provided for in Article 20(1)(a) and (d) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, requests for access, as well as requests for rectification or objection will be answered in accordance with section 5 of Council Decision 2004/644/EC (3).

Personal data will be retained for 5 years from the moment the data subject has been removed from the list of persons subject to the asset freeze or the validity of the measure has expired, or for the duration of court proceedings in the event they had been started.

Data subjects may have recourse to the European Data Protection Supervisor in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.

---

(1)  OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1.

(2)  OJ L 12, 19.1.2016, p. 1.

(3)  OJ L 296, 21.9.2004, p. 16.

---
No. 11-10937.

#### Black *v.*Risner, Sheriff, Ashland County, Ohio.

Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied.
CONSENT OF ANTONIO PALOCCI FILHO, THE MINISTER OF FINANCE


 
Exhibit 4(8)

 
 
FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL 
MINISTRY OF FINANCE 
 
 
 
CONSENT 
 
 
I, Antonio Palocci Filho, Minister of Finance of the
Federative Republic of Brazil, hereby consent to the reference to my name, in my official capacity as Minister of Finance, under the caption “Official Statements” in the Prospectus of the Federative Republic of Brazil included in the
Registration Statement filed by the Federative Republic of Brazil with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. 
 

	 /S/    ANTONIO PALOCCI
FILHO

	

	 Antonio Palocci Filho

	 Minister of Finance
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofSumma Industries (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended May31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, James R. Swartwout, Chief Executive Officer and ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to my knowledge:

 

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ James R. Swartwout  |
|-------------------------|
| James R. Swartwout      |
| Chief Executive Officer |
| Chief Financial Officer |
| Summa Industries        |
| July 8, 2004            |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Summa Industriesand will be retained by Summa Industries and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 70 (Friday, April 11, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 17773]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-9441]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 97-109, RM-9018]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Eckley, CO

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document requests comments on a petition for rule making 
filed by KRDZ Broadcasters, Inc., requesting the allotment of Channel 
237C1 to Eckley, Colorado, an incorporated community, as its first 
local aural transmission service. Coordinates used for Channel 237C1 at 
Eckley are those of the city reference at 40-06-48 NL and 102-29-18 WL.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before May 27, 1997, and reply 
comments on or before June 11, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC 
20554. In addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties 
should serve the petitioner, as follows: KRDZ Broadcasters, Inc., Attn: 
Robert D. Zellmer, Jr., President, P.O. Box 2475, Greeley, CO 80632.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Joyner, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 
418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 97-109, adopted March 26, 
1997, and released April 4, 1997. The full text of this Commission 
decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business 
hours in the FCC's Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW., 
Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractors, International 
Transcription Service, Inc., (202) 857-3800, 2100 M Street, NW., Suite 
140, Washington, DC 20037.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of l980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contacts.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
See 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 97-9441 Filed 4-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6070

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CEDRIC LAMONT DEAN, a/k/a Ced,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees,

District Judge. (CR-95-31-V, CA-01-362-V)

Submitted: March 14, 2002 Decided: March 26, 2002

Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cedric Lamont Dean, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C.F. Shappert,

Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Cedric Lamont Dean seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. United States v. Dean, Nos. CR-95-31-V; CA-01-

362-V (W.D.N.C. Oct. 31, 2001). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### LaPointe v. State

106,492

10/01/13

Denied

Unpublished
#### State v. Anderson

110,915

07/21/2015

Denied.

Unpublished
EXHIBIT 32.2

                               Color Imaging, Inc.
                 Form 10-Q - First Quarter Ended March 31, 2004

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Morris E. Van Asperen, certify that to the best of my knowledge:

The Form 10-Q of Color  Imaging,  Inc. for the period ended March 31, 2004 fully
complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) and 15(d) of the  Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

The  information  contained  in such report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of Color  Imaging,
Inc. for the periods presented.

This   certification  is  being  furnished   pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley   Act  of  2002  and,  except  to  the  extent  required  by  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act,  shall not be  deemed  to be filed as part of the  periodic
report described herein nor shall it be deemed filed by Color Imaging,  Inc. for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





                                        /S/ MORRIS E. VAN ASPEREN
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                        Morris E. Van Asperen
                                        Chief Financial Officer
Date: April 27, 2004
<PAGE>   1
                                                               EXHIBIT 24

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY
                                -----------------

                            ROYAL APPLIANCE MFG. CO.
                            ------------------------

       KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS; that Royal Appliance Mfg. Co. and each
person whose name is signed below hereby constitute and appoint Michael J.
Merriman and Richard G. Vasek, or both of them, their attorney-in-fact and
agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for and on behalf of
Royal Appliance Mfg. Co. and the undersigned Directors and officers of Royal
Appliance Mfg. Co., to sign Royal Appliance Mfg. Co.'s Annual Report on Form
10-K, any or all amendments thereto, and to file the same, with exhibits thereto
and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, granting such attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to
do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary in
connection with such matters and hereby ratifying and confirming all that such
attorney-in-fact and agent or his substitute or substitutes may do or cause to
be done by virtue hereof.

       This Power of Attorney of Royal Appliance Mfg. Co. and the Directors and
officers of Royal Appliance Mfg. Co. may be executed in multiple counterparts,
each of which shall be deemed an original with respect to the person executing
it.

       IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Power of Attorney has been signed at Cleveland,
Ohio this 14th day of March, 1997.

                                   ROYAL APPLIANCE MFG. CO.

                                   By:    /s/  Richard G. Vasek
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                        Richard G. Vasek, Controller, Secretary
                                        and Chief Accounting Officer

                                    DIRECTORS

/s/ Jack Kahl Jr.                           /s/ Michael J. Merriman
------------------------------------        ---------------------------------
Jack Kahl Jr.                               Michael J. Merriman

/s/ E. Patrict Nalley                       /s/ Joseph B. Richey, II
------------------------------------        ---------------------------------
E. Patrick Nalley                           Joseph B. Richey, II

/s/ John P. Rochon                          /s/ R. Louis Schneeberger
------------------------------------        ---------------------------------
John P. Rochon                              R. Louis Schneeberger