-- 

m. 4 

. ** . ..I 

.:. * 'I - N-'77 CONTRACT PROPUSAL- . - ..*

INTRODUCTION 

The FY-77 Annual tiork Plan P.dvlce for the East Lansing Field OfficeEcological Services containEd a specific coiunitrnent requfrlng this 

station to test and analyze contract methodologies in the-permtts and 

licenses program. After corsidcrable discussion &mons the East Lanslng

Field Office staff, It was cccided that 31C(b) denonstration studies 

should be the target projccl. Both Sect'ion 10 and NPDES progrems are . directly affected and, to a lesser degree, Nuclear Regulatory Comjssion projects are related to the proposed contract. 

!;TATEKE!IT OF WORK 

Utflfties in tfic Great Lake:; Region, as in the rest 04 the Unfted States, 

are requlred undcr Section :!16 of the FeCeral \.later Pollution Control 

Act hmndments of 1972 to amduct 316(b denonstration studies on toolfng

water intake structures. Slxtion 316(b requfres that cooling water 

intake .structures reflect tile best available technology for ninimjzfng

adverse cnvironaental lnpacx. These adverse impacts generally result 

from entrainirent of snafl a quatic organisms such as macrobenthos and 

larval fish and impingement of larger organism, usualiy adult fish. 

The objectlve of conducting intake studies is to obtain the most accurate 

quantStative estimate of en trainncnt and fmpfngerimt losses or damages occurring at a plant. It 1s then possible to deterinhe what, If any,

better technologies exist t3 minimize adverse Impacts at a particular

stem electric generating station recognizing that certaln Impacts nay

be acceptable to the long-term maintenance and productivity of the 

aquatic ccosysten In question. Obvlously, the real problems are twofold: 

(I) quantifying intake fn;scts and (2) predicting the associated impacts . on the water body froin which cooling water is withdrawn. If the US. Fish 

and \!ildlife Service can dmonstrate that itens '1 and 2 above are adversely 'hipacting the fishery and cthcr aquatic resources by reviewing a partlcular 31G(b) denonstratlon study and associated data, It may be possible to 

rccomend that a utility provide "better technology" at one or more plants

utilizing the Section 10 ard NPDES routes. The objectfve noM becoaes clear. 1 1s it possible to build a sound case out of a Section 316(b) demonstration 1 study gfven our statutory i*esponsfbillties?. 

SCOPE OF EIORK 

The scope of work for this contract Includes the revfeki and anatysls of 

selected 376(b) Ceraonstrat.;on studies on steam electric power plant intake 

stnrctures conducted pursu.int to PL 92-503. the Federal Water Pol lutlon 

Act Amendments of 1972. Mwk under this contract shall be perfomed as 

descrtbcd bel ow: 
.I.. 

0 .. .. - :'­ r ­

. .. a 

..

Phase I c- . Phase I Involves the revlew and analysls of the sanplfng techniques employed

by the utility to gather the entrainment and impingement data presented in 

the 376(b) report. Sarnpl ing design and methodologies for fish including 

eggs, larva, fry, young-of-the-year and other small fish, adult or large fish, macrobcnthos, and zooplankton shall be glven a detalled scfentlfic 

analysis to deternine if appropriate methods. were employed to gather

unblascd data and if the sampling program sought answers to the right

questions. In each instance cited above, the contractor shall specify

if the methods employed by the applicant (ut11fty) are scientifical ly val 4d. 

If the methods employed contzin biases, these shall be described. The 

effects or influences that these biases have on the results (data) shall 

also be defined. 

. 

Phase I1 

Phase XI involves the review and analysis of the data obtained by the app1.fcant (utfltty) and presented t'n or as a part of the 316(b) study. Functlons 

to be pcrfomd include tiic verificatfon of the accuracy of the data pre- ,. 

sented, calculation of and/or vcrification of confidence intervals or 1imits 

of the data presented. Appropriate statistical testing methods shall be 

utl'lfzcd to verify accuracy of results and to determine the mgnftude of 

the sampling variation. The analysis conducted in thls phase should Oeteminc 

the real value of the data in terns of biological and statistical sicpic' I icancf 

a0 thcse data accurately reflect the rrignitude of the losscs involved due to 

dmpfngernent and ,entrajnrrrent? Delayed or latent mortal itles and sublethal 

effects as a result of entrainnent or hpingement should be fully discussed. 

Phase 111 

Phase TI1 involves the analysls of data to detcmfne or predfct the fapact of 

the cooling water Intake on the fish, macrobenthos, and zooplankton pqwlatlor of the coolins water source($). The contractor will, in nost Instanc.zs, need 

to utllize data sources in additlon to the 316(b) study to verlfy thcse predictions ifmade by the applicant and/or to predlct the hpacts If not done 

by the applicant. 

It w311 be necessary to deternine both the local and far-fjeld effects on the 

water body from which cooling water 1s wlthdrawn. In some Instances, two or 

more cooling water sources sucb as a river and a lake rnust'be considered. 

The contractor should determine if the Intake Is located in a sensitive biological area such as an iiiportant spawning or nursery area for any spccles

affected by tfie intake. Entrainment and lapingeaent Itqacts caused by the 

intake under study should be related Jn a total rranner to inpacts caused by

other power plant tntakes on the same body or region of water on sensjtive 

or otherwise important fish stocks If sufftcient data is available to pemft manlngful predictions. 
. .. * . . I

.c ._ . . ­ 147 . -. 

The results of the anatysi!. performed shall be provlded to the East 

Lanslng Field Offfce and tfie Regional Office in Craft fom for revjcw

prior to being accepted as a final product. The report shall contain 

the data analysis cs dcscr:bed under the Scope of ti’ork. The funnat 

shall contaln the neccssar)’ infomation In a narrative fom as well 8s 

approprlatc tab1 es graphs, etc. I. 

Tim frames for the report arc: e 

‘Date Project Initiated: 9/1/76 

Date of Interim Report: 6/7/77 

Date-of Ffna’l Report: 12/15/77 I 

.. 

b 

. 
148 

, -

APPENDIX B 

Errors found on Detroit Edison's daily impingement 

data sheets (IDS) and test screenwell tally sheets 

(listed by sampling date). 
149 

This is not an exhaus.:ive list. All the daily impingement data sheets 

for the nontest screens we::e checked, but the tally sheets [for the fish on 

the test screens and the fish pumped into the holding pool) were checked 

for only 20 of the 164 tes: screenwell sampling days. On these 20 days, we 

found 22 discrepancies bet'geen the data recorded on the tally sheets and 

the data summarized on the daily impingement data sheets. 

Data sheets for 9-24-75, 11-26-75, 4-1-76,and 4-2-76 are included as 

examples. * = corrections made by GLJ?L. 
150 ,-­

6-19-75: 

6-24-75: 

6-26-75 : 

7-8-75: 

7-16-75 : 

8-14-75: 

9-9-75 : 

9-23-75 : 

9-24-75: 

9-25-75 : 

9-26-75: 

10-7-75: 

4 channel catfish are not entered in total column on IDS for nontest screens. 

4 shad are not recorded in total column on IDS for non-test- screens; 

2 alewives counted in pool were not recorded on IDS for test 

screens. 

Shiner total on IDS for non-test screens equals 328, not 344. 

The number of shiners counted in pool equals 419, not 424. 

The IDS for non-test screens should list 1 logperch in the total 

column instead of 1 rock bass. 1 trout perch counted in pool 

was not recorded on IDS. 3 trout-perch and 1 sunfish counted on 

test screens were not recorded on IDS. The shad counted in pool 

equal 1020, not 1050; those counted on test screens equal 345 not 24! 

Shad total on IDS for non-test screens equals 796, not 836. 

1 trout-perch was counted on test screens, not 2 as recorded on 

IDS; 1 logperch was counted on test screens, but it was not recorded 

on IDS: white bass counted on test screens total 358, not 338. 

White bass total on IDS for non-test screens is 373t not 353. 

Yellow perch total on IDS for non-test screens is 147, not 113; 

white bass total for non-test screens is 220, not 202. 

White bass total on IDS for non-test screens is 326 instead of 361; 

shad total for non-test screens is 279, not 259. 

White bass courrted on test screens total 52, not 51. 

Drum counted on test screens total 20, not 27. 

I_ 

" ­

_­

"­

e.-
151 

10-14-75: 

10-29-75 : 

11-4-75 : 

11-11-75 : 

11-13-75 : 

11-14-75 : 

11-18-75 : 

11-26-75 : 

12-3-75 : 

12-11-75 : 

1-23-76 : 

1-27-76: 

2-12-76 : 

3-10-76: 

Yellow perch total on IDS for non-test screens equals 81, not 80; 

shad total equals :!9l.,not 651. 

Drum total on IDS :'or non-test screens equals 98 not 88. 

Perch total on IDS for non-test screens is 37, not 36; alewife 

total is 89, not 8:3; shad total is 357, not 362. 

10 channel catfish and 1 smallmouth bass were not recorded in total 

column on IDS for ion-test screens; smelt total is 9, not 56; 

walleye total is 31, not 11; logperch total is 17, not 5. 

1 gar and 19 smallnouth bass were not entered in total column on 

IDS for non-test sxaens; white bass total equals 13 instead 

of 16; smelt total is 204, not 222. 

Smallmouth total cn IDS for non-test screens is 7, not 4. 

Shad total on IDS for non-test screens is 189, not 269. 

Shad total on IDS for non-test screens is 398 instead of 298. 

c 

Perch total on IDS for non-test screens equals 340, not 190; 

northern pike tote1 equals 4, not 1; crappie total equals 4, not 1; 

and shad total eqt.als 8860, not 6940. 

1 channel catfish was not recorded in total column on IDS for 

non-test screens. 

Shiner total on 11)s for non-test screens is 560, not 520. 

1 northern pike wiis not recorded in total column on IDS for nontest screens. 

2 smelt were not recorded in total column on IDS for non-test 

screens. 

Goldfish total on IDS for non-test screens is 26, not 27. 
152 

3-23-76: 

4-1-76: 

4-2-76: 

4-7-76: 

4-8-76 : 

4-9-76 : 

4-14-76 : 

4-15-76 : 

4-16-76 : 

4-20-76 : 

4-21-76 : 

5-4-76 : 

5-25-76: 

5-27-76 : 

Perch total on IDS for non-test screens is 52, not 50. 

85 trout perch counted in pool and 39 counted on test screens 

were not recorded on IDS for test screens; the number of shiners 

counted in pool equals 652, not 552. 

1 bowfin counted in pool was not recorded on IDS for test screens; 

the number of shad counted in pool equals 273, not 43. 

1 lamprey counted in pool and 1 white bass counted on screens 

were not recorded on IDS for test screens. 

Alewife total on IDS for non-test screens is 182, not 184; 2 sunfish 

were not recorded in total column on IDS for non-test scree3s. 

155 shad were not recorded in total column on IDS for non-test 

screens. 

445 shiners were counted in the pool, not 425. 

28 trout-perch were counted in the pool, not 30. 

34 shad were counted on the test-screens, not 25. 

Smelt total on IDS for non-test screens 1s 41, not 9. 

63 perch were counted in pool, not 64 as recorded on IDS for test 

screens. 

Alewife total on IDS for non-test screens (Screenhouse 1) is 44 

not 43; 1 walleye was not recorded in total column (Screenhouse 2). 

Alewife total on IDS for non-test screens is 22, not 21. 

Shad total on IDS for non-test screens (Screenhouse 2) is 65, not 60 
. *... 153 Detroit Edison 

9/24/75 . . 

.i 

.... 

m 

)-I

0 

Ccl 

.IJ 

a, 

a,

c 

.. 

4 

ClilC. Fl:-:.% os: 

USIT 1 LWT 2 WIT 3 GXIT 4

3 04 3 3 

* Yellow perch total = 147, not 113. 

** 

White bass total = 220, not 202. 

8 
Detroit E:dison 154 11/26/75 

. 

SCREES COLiT: 1 ­ 2 ­

3 ­

4 -

USIT 2 

a c 

* 

Shad total = 398, not 298 
----- 

Detroit Tdison - 4/1/76 

illy sheet shows 

>at the number of 

liners counted in u

aJ 

mol totals 652, 5

a 

)t 552 

h 

4 

i trout perch ri 

Id

)unted in pool are f3 

)t recorded on rl 

0 

Lily impingement 0

& 

ita sheet for 

!st screens. 

-_.___ 

Reproduced from 

best available copy. 
, ­

156.

-

m

5 a

L4 

0 

ul 

U 

u) 

Q,

t3 

u 

0 

rcr 

cl 

a 

Q, 

h 

rl

-4 a

n 

*Tally sheet shows 

that the number of 

shad counted in 

pool totals 273, 

not 43. "­

**1bowfin counted d 

in pool is not 0 0

recorded on daily PI 

impingement data I ,

sheet. 
157 

APPENDIX C 

Detroit Edisoi daily impingement data sheets for the 

Monroe plant for August 1975. 
._. . L 

Detroit Edison 

8/1/75 * 

.. 

r--. 
*- . .__ 159 

. . . 

z3 

-__ -

Reproduced from 

best available copy. 

c 

. ... 
. 160 , ! 

Dbtroit Ediso1 

8/6j75 

c 

5.1 

I# 4 

c-
-- 

a 

~ 

Reproduced From 

besl available copy. -

8 

I 
-. ­

. = I 

.. e 
I? 

i

i

1

i

f 

AIR T�?tP - C 

.TURSIDITY - cm 

BAR. PRFSS. ­

c­3 3' 

*Error found.by GLFL: Gizzard shad counted = 199, not 209; total ='796, not 836. 

1 

.I 
* . Detroit Edisdn . 

7­

a 

. 

-.I ,-. 

I 

L

SCREEN COL?\T: 1 ­ 2 ­

3 ­

4 ­

1 . 

WIT 4 

3... 3 

-.._ .. c-i 
- - 

165 Detroit Edison ~ 

I ' 8/26/75 . 

. 

Reproduced from 

best available copy. . ____ . - ---_ . -
. 66 A:. 

. b Detroit Edis 

8/27/75 

. 

.­

. 

- ' . - ... 

.. I 1 
I. ._. . - &. .I . -_ L 

-. _. * ­

.__.. 

1 

. 

__- ..-- - __-

Reproduced from 

best available COPY. 
Detroit Edison 

... 8/29/75 

. 

.. 

. 
169 

APPENDIX D 

Examples of effezt of log10 (x + 1) transformation on the 

normality of estimates based on counts from Detroit Edison's 

daily impingement and entrainment data sheets. Plots 

computed by Tektronix 4051 graphic calculator. 
Impingeme 

170 Shiners 

August 19 

Normal plot of untransformed daily estimates 

28350 

22680 

5670 

0 e. 01 1 

.. 

4.6 

QI

+I 3.8 . a

E 

iJY 

. 3.4 . h 

a 

Q 

Y 

3

0 

6;’

0

i4 

2.6 

2.2 

x 

20 48 60 88 99 

-

99.99 

Cumulative Frequency (%I 

Normal plot of daily estimates 

transformed by loglo (x + 1) 

Cumulative Frequency ( #.I 
171 Impingement 1 

Gizzard shad 1 

February 1976 

$orma1 plot of untransfomed daily estimates 

c 

89670 

f1736 

a 

4Ja 53882 .?I 

u 

ul

w 

17934 

0 * I 

1 20 40 60 80 99 . 99.99 

Cumulative Frequency (%) 

Normal plot of daily estimates 

transformed by loglo (x + 1) 

- 5 L 

4.8 

+ 4.6 

4J2 4.4 

$ 4 Y 

0 

0 

m4 3.8 f I3 

3.6 

3.4 

e.ei 1 20 40 60 80 99 99.99 

Cumulative Frequency (%) 
172 

St3980 

46962% 

365268 

260908 

* 156540 

52ise 

h 

44 

+ 

247533 

202527 

c

0 

1575‘1 

112515 

h 67503 

rl 

.PI 

a 

Q 

22583 

Ent, 

Chi. 

Aug1 

Noma1 plot of daily estimates 

based on untransformed counts 

99 

Cumulative Frequency (%) 

Normal plot of daily estimates based 

on counts transformed by loglo (x + 1) 

/XX 

s4 

% Cumulative Frequency (%I 
173 

APPENDIX E 

Impingement and Zntrainment estimates for the Monroe Power 

Plant based on l>g10 (x + 1) transformation and counts from 

Detroit Edison's daily impingement and entrainment data sheets. 
174 

Table E-1. Estimates of impingement at the Monroe Power Plant 

for June 1975-May 1976 based on log10 (x + 1) transformation 

of daily estimates calculated from Detroit Edison's daily 

impi'ngement data sheets. 

Table 32-2. Estimates of entrainment of fish eggs and larvae at 

the Monroe Power Plant for April 1975-May 1976 based on log10 

Ix + 1) transformation of counts from Detroit Edison's daily 

entrainment data sheets. 

Table E-3. Estimates of entrainment of macrozoobenthos at the 

Monroe Power Plant for May 1975-April 1976 based on log10 (x + 1) 

transformation of counts from Detroit Edison's daily entrainment 

data sheets. 
-- 

175 h 

I.I 

­ !­

0 

v ...... -0% 3.- ut­

.!. 

..

k -4 o a

ww 

4Ju

E .?.I i" ma 

- m e.0

I -

I1N -10 L.1. 9 0 flto

1- ! --.--I 

1 .i.. ..,. la zk 0 0-'al

l - 0 .!..... 

I i o dld d d c; d 0 30'00'0Ol j .:..I. 

I 

...... :i. .I.. 

0:- uu vu dT.d3)13 

u4.w e0 0.c WW'F 0 JO 

.i. ...I. : . .I. 4 .. 

..I. . II 

3 i U I r 

0 

IIi

a

-51 '1I 

m 

! 

1 1 i .G 

-

0 " 1 3 lx; -.-$-n

I , did d 

I 0 d.dd 

t 

.. .. 0 olo0 

... I 

;oooo 

... 

10 oao 

0

' 1.. 0 0'00 

... 0 0;OO

I 0 djdd

I 

. .. 0090 

--iN 

-1, - G'- c -1.1­ -8-

.I .u 

WIW .*.04 

YI:w 

1 
C 

176 

C.

1 

'1..

iI '9 

I 3 0 .j 

I

I 

..i t.. t i . 30 IhlU~OY I 1*..309* 

t :.-rum-

.. 

>a 

.. 

iIIi n9 1

! .. 

ne I 

: . ~-

I 

1 ..

>a 

I .. r.0 ,. 1: It 

.i

I .. *. DC Ii 

.< , 4.f I. 

N -

.I 

I CIU 

N-

>C 

1

i 

I 

_ _

UL 

3-

c - 1 UIC 

I ?? u 

Y 

L 

c 

a 

J 

I 
/ 

.. 

177 

! 

I 

I 

j II

i 

i 

i 

I 

! 

! 

I 

t 

! 

: 

I 

7

3. 

m-yr 

c;Id O< 

~000' I. .i. 

OIO I. 50 i .E

I.-i. 0~0J.oc I . 

I 

0,o i. 0,o 1.c

/ 1 

..*

oloooc 

c'oocc I.!.,

i i I . . .<

q"9=f 

coo+; 1. i lie I.OlaI.c4 

O!CC40 I.!. .

00 I. 0.0 1..0 

10 1-L ­

; I ..I.. 

dOc'0. 0. - c NP m nJm*r--
178 -. 

. . 1 .d 

. ­ 4 0 

.*...I..... 

..... 

I f 

I.... iiI 

'0,000 f 

..... iij 

_-_I 

. .

.......I 

......I 

i'I 1 
199 

I 

(. .'I J ..I 

I

I 

i 
L 

0 

ar10 

=lo] 

~~~o 

180 i ..... I * o< >C 

* 

U 

. >aoqo .*... '1 O< JC 1 1 >ooao .!.!. oc ac '4 . .I.!; 1 3: :d De 

..... I 0: Dooao ac ;d 

. *.... .. 1 I I i oc 3aouo >C a? 

1 

. 'qoqo .I.!. >C '1

.i 

. Ot 

...I./ I a ­

oc 3dOOO ac 

.. ;qoI. I .0 a< '? oc 

... 

0 e 3C 

Od q+

i 

-c 

3: 

?I 

n. 

.!.... I 0: 340 0,o 

I --.--e i l -. ZUUGL2 4: 

h -r,3 -I7 

\I ;.AIFO3 

.? 

.OI e *.e I hl*l* ! I 
>I 

181 

..... 

>-JycYC-O VI 

ooomu 01 

>4-0r- ?I 

r.-.rnm.o 9. 

.e. 1-1-. 30000 

oqooo .I-.. I . 

*..!j . 0 0 .j. 

oTlo ... 4 .

20;; 

OO.OQQ m-l\rv)m

N(YeCQ uq(LqrdGoq0 1.1. 1 - '0 

..I . 0 

..... II d 34q0 oooao '0 

..1.1. 0 

. O.I0]O 

.i... 

00000 

0

o OQO

e 

:il: -.TI- XUm(YN

-30-a

**-am 

i 
182 , -
183 

.1.

>c: 0 1 

3 

.*. 

oc 0 e . I . 

OCQ 

C 

ci

.I 

:! i 

! 

I 

i 

1 1

1 

I 

I 

:i 

1 1

i i! j

! 

I 
184 
185 
186 

i-
187 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

3 

0 

0 

0 

0 

..

a0 

ao 

co 

eo 
Or 

5. a. 

.. 

3 -. ur 9 * t - 1 1 3 D. ai Of ?* 

4; 1

I 3 31 

. 0 >I 

!

i 

.* 3 r. 31 

V. 

t. 

I(# 

OI0t :. . 

3 31 0 

s: 0' 3 P. D 

W 

m. + 1 r., I

I NI 

.;. D 01 0 

oi.e 0. 0 0' 0 

..i0'0 0 0 0 0

2; 0 0 

.. 

0 c 0 1 O : 1 1 

i .t 

I i 

. .s .. 

A. 0 

Oi0 < 0' v\ 

m. m r-. Q

I : 

0 1 0 - - U u 3 2 

0 4n N 

0. 0: Ln 
II! 11

i­!

I 
190 ,, 

. ­

.. 
.I * .4* .. 

. I 

oc 01 JCQ 3 a i '4' Or' .(. 

>c 0 a > (

D ;q. .I.

0 

t 

0 

10 . 

1 Oh0 3 

*In 

0

- c,- r fWF + >ce -4 

L - rl -4 

DPO 

1

I 0 

'OCOl 

:r ;*dl >c 0 

. 

0 

! c 

.a . ... 

.1 . 

oc 0' c 

... 

O

d jl( dddr 

.I . 

9 

f 

aco 0 

1;c 

.a. *fa 

000 DCO 0 

.I. . I * 

.I . 

JC 0 OCO 0 0 * . OI0 .*. . a o OCO 0

li9 3 

* . 000 3 0 

.<. 

oca 0 . 1 . 

oca 0 

I 

V 

2 

In00 

7"sI 
192 

... ..... 0 >a0 D 3aOCO< n 

6 

... 0 JOO 3 

... 0 300 

p

. 

0 

9 

n 

. d . 'i I 3010 d 1: 0 . .i 0 

Q 

-.( 

hl 

hl 

0 0 

c 1;

I; C 

I 

I 

I 

i; 

I 

!C C 

!.

i90 

IO

I -

:-

Im 
193 

>I 31 

C 

C

..<I

1"q.. 

aoc 

i 

..I 

0,I 

I 

O CJ ,

I .. 

o ci1.. 

*... 

0000 I01 .

I '1 I .,

o c 4'1' .. 4.4. 

40 a0 o a Ij 0. 

00 
I i

i 

1. 

,ot 

i 

1 

! 

! -

9'

L.L. 

000,01 

IO' I i 1 ! . 1'. .... 0 ooqo 

1 i

i .... I. / I 1 0 0.090 

1i 

..d. I' 

0.040 

194 

... 

oooc 41' .. 00,OC 0 0 1-i. I.... 

. I

0j.1. ,000

i" 0 0 0.0 oc 

.

] *!..i o c 0 '000 I.!. . m

qd

4T 

I/ .I 

oc 

. 

oc 

oc 

196 

. I 

>C 

0

'1* .. 4' 

0

lo ..' '1 - q

9 

1 

O. 

0 

.1 I. J '1 ao IO

,. 

1 < 

O I! 

.. I. 

IO 

00 

i .. 

'0 

.* di . d D )e 

00 I

i .. -i 5 DO 

,. 

.e 

0 30 

1 

.. r 03 

c 

c 

I db 

_ -

__A 
197 

Tato ,... ooooc .... 4 0. 

/ I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

! 

! 

i

// 

!! 

1 :

i L .

I1 
-

... 

000 

.')e

O 1

d4' .. 

i 

! '9;d dc 

so 

I

o!

I .

c 
0 

199 

I 

n 

10 

0 

3 

i 

3 

Y 

9 

9 

J --

P 

D 

3 nn Y

. 

3 

> 

0 

O 

U 

D 

.I 

4 

D 

D 

3 

2 

1 

L 

201 

I 

rt >C 3: .i

I 

-0 

YU 

-U 

ac >C ac 

. J ... 

'1 3c oc 

:1ac >O 

*,. 

ooo,oc 

I 

.. 4. 

* I

jI 'i.. 0.0 00 c '4 1I 

.* 0'00.0c J O 

0.00;oc ;qi

.­1

.... 

qoojoc 

Ill

.1.1.:. .... 0 c.ao0.o. QOOQ: 9 1.1.: ..... c3*-.t­ - nam­ 0 4 3.0 L: 

mnmeo I ! 

' I J... 

5000 C 

-'-I =IC, 5 

h ...,-I­

%yIWmu 

Q ­ .Y)yI. 

! 

1 
I 

s;c; I/ 3C a JOO< ,C 

C . . 1;

.,.. 3C I .

0 1 a ... !dt C 

1 

.. .. >oo< D 

113' I c 

,I 0 c 0.0 

! ti '1 I:ri 

iI .. ...*. .* os 0.00 0 a 0; id 0 4 3 ... 

i

I 

jd < C I 

I

I I '7*< .. .... .. i. P 

..I. ! i * c

I ! 

'I--< 

I. C 

I v v *.O +cy IO 0.0 u-mmrn:~ EO + PEOY 0 8

m m at- P v' I c e. 

it '7 

. I

I i .!.!. 

z PU.t.0 c4ar ;/ .c

Y d-. 

1 .:. i.i* *. 0.0 D 4 '0 oodo e C I

io' I !.I. !. .I .. J... .o< 

0:0 q o 0.0 

0 1 oodo e C 

J

7 .. .I.. I /. ..I 0 

. I. 

t 0.0 O O =lo O O1 io' I

I .I I . .... .. I 

01 0 

II

!. 

t c*m 

01 Q 7 jO' I T I .. :I ... 001 0.0olo 00.2 0' < > 

I 

I. 

..I 

I 

/ I iL; < 1 -.,?

e-. 

--I 

UfP..

o'-. 

Uln. 

f : .!. 1 3 r. 

­ 0.0* 

I 

I 1 

I 

I 

i 

1 
-- 

4 

i 

... . ! I 

0 >C 

. 0 >c 

0 JC 

0 >C 

n >C 

0 >C 

0 >C 

9 >C 

. 0 >C 

0 ac 

0 >C 

0 >C 

:: d J ­ v '111

*a 

I >O 

..I 

>o 

.. 

>O 

. 30 

. >O 4 > 

>O 

>o 

I W

.-a 302 r -

a 

z ... 

>O* 

I 
! 

! 
205 

1. ... >( 300 I 3c dJ;c 

...I, .e. I ac 'I01 

aooc 'OQOC 

.1. 3C >a0 I ' 0I. 0'0I.c 

1 ..1i' 4 00 c I. I..

i 

! 

i 

i I

i i

I 

I 

i

i 
.... Idd 0 0 O!O 

t i ­ I. ! I .... 

0.0c 0

rc ! I 1 .

i0 E 

I

1..

10' 

(d 

I 
OOiT oqo~o 

207 

0 

a 

C 

1 

t 

I4 

i 

1 

i

i 

00000

I / ..... 

... 0 

!: 

II 
208 

,-

I, 
209 

. .1 

n 

n 

D 

. 

3 

I 

n

ni 

0 

I 

I 

i 
.o 

(Y. 

210 

...... oloo'oo0 : 

...... 

. . 0'00:o0 0 

c

..... ii ...... v 0'0 0:o ooooot 

/ I

I J I ...... 0'00'0 0 o c

1 ooooooc ...... 1 

00 

..... I. 0'0 I C 0 < 

)OOOO i I 010 0 a 00 0'0 0 0 < ...... 1.1... I I

I 

....... . 

I 1

orro: 0'0....... 0'0 0 I 0 t C 

z 

1 

L 

....... I 010 0.00 0 a 

I 

.--c- 0 

I 

3 

U 

*I .'OI

..... *Fur-* . 

.I c 

- .-1 ­ -1 

.. Ii

._ . D 0:o0'3 

I 9 

.. 

! 

.. ....). OO( 001000 1

.. f

Or: 

.'

0,o 

1 .-. : D 0'0 0 0 

... ! 

i

..* .'.

oioc 

..!- ....... oot 0 CJ'O 0.0 

. ,

.:I. 

.. .'. 

0,o , ­ < 06.0 0:o 

._. 

i' d!d< ...... 

CIO'OOO

I

.. i ..... I ". 

0.31 0 e.0

00

i ....... ;r-I:* 

2.I b3.U 

-. Q 2.3-13 .I . I 2.w1 \W*u\n*?. no 9:. so; I-'

I . -
0 

211 

... 4 

3 >C >ooc 

... > a30< 

... 

3001 a 

.. 

D C 0 

... c a 4" 

2 .. 

00 a C

[0 

ii E 

1

IC I C -1 >

'I 3 1I .. BO 

a 

0 

N

. 

0 

I 
212 

0 

0 

,­

c,­

. 

I 

IO 

O0IO ; 

214 

... .... 1 ... e 

ac J O!O 00 40 c J ;C 0 

'Or I 

*.*. ...I ii . ... . J 0.0 000.0c 3' a o:oi > 3c 0 

l i

i

I 

I

I ... d.. ! . 

.i 

I . .O ot J 0.0 0000~J 1 OI0I 3 0 

i 1 Ii

.. ... *.C. 

i [ I/ .d. 

0 ot 300 0.00:o< J > 31 

i 

I

i

! .:

..'. =Or 

I. ... 

j / 

J.ojo >t .'. 0 01 300 000,0~3 3 i

I ....i.

... 

!il 

..!I* 01 

0 0:o0'0 I a 

0 00 3 

1 ' I 

I 

I 

.....a .a. l l4. ... .o 0 0.0 0:o OOO!OI 0 0 0, 

I 

i .I./ I 

1. 0 .I. qo 0:o I. 1. 

.1 . 0000 0 0 0 

'0 

I

I!:. I1 00 0:o ., 

I 

..I 

3 

;!; 

0 0 

I :, ....!. ... i' 0.0a10 0 100;o 0 !c. d 

/I 

I

I 

1 . C 0 

I 

I

jo

! 

i­

,, 

I -

I. . ,,...---
215 
216 

.. 

.-
4 

- - 

2 17 

-4. ...... 1 J 0 ai > c 'i' . ... ' ;4; 

,o DOOC 

~ooo10 /didd/d

i 

.. 

..... I ... ..... I

.01 >oooo 

! 300 00 

! i 

! 

i I / t ! ... I 1 1. 

'9' ...... :oI J 0.00 0 D0'000 !

i 

i

I 

1. 1 0 3ooa.o 

..... '1 .. DOiOSO 

1. I. '0

00 0'0 

I,

\ i 

! /! 

I ' 

I 

I .?.d, 

. J. d. I.e.1. id JSOdO ooooo 

I 

I i i'. .^ >OCC'O 

..... ... 0 

..... 

00-0 I / r0; 0 ..... 0,o00 

! 

I" 

I . 

i l 

1

I i ..... ... ..... .eo00 00000 I 

..... ..... 3 Or0 si 0 0000'0

I 

...... ooc 0 n 00000 

i .. UJ 

1. 

1 . . .I. 

.* ..1.1. 0 0 0.0 ; I : a- GdddG 

1 

i 

I . 2 

.... ....... 

3 O#Oa0 0 6.000 

- ~00000 

I 

t I I 

--!I n 0-r.­

1-

i io 

--.- ;i E 0.vv.u a13 -1:3 = ?k! ?.U 1 AZU!U -- -.3 ;*!**!O .;In!* do .P.5 o..c .:. e Q' -10

i- V).".. YIW. 

!'. 

!: 

i .. . I 
2 18 

! 

I 

,. . 

1 OiO i j 1 . 

.i 0 

"I" 

..

I'iI I 
2 19 

e 
-- 

0 

- 

220 

4 a O< 3 OC 4 

F 

F 

.. 

aoooo C 3 O( J 01 . * .a. . ... ;0 0 0'0 c J OC 3 0 4 0,o J 

c 

(. 

..... . ... , .;I . > 00 0:o C J D C 3 0 ojo I0;O 

I 

I 

;2; ;I; C DE 

.. 0 *I. 8 0

... I. 

C 3 oc 3 D OtO IO 

: 

.. 

010 E 3 c! 3 ac 1 G ;id. 

. ... , .t 

i. *. 0 3C 3 0 0,o IOC IO 

... 0 1 ac > 300 1;; 

..... 

..' .... I. 

? 0'0 0'0- 0 1 3C 1 D O'OI roou IO 

I 

I

- U I .:.< ......U .... I1 

b . 

0 a: > D 0'02 '0.0> IO 

f 1 : ...... .... ,..., I000OC a > DC 0 010 - I 0.0 m 

I 

.--e-"

c I-I-.1: .--"I :

:u'uuuc I JC u v-u IUUC 

m I A: 

3 +3 < I +a c *I d U 

.. lu-anoo- \ 3C 1 Ln *-ot L 0'0 

.601 c.u U FC 

;S'" I r 2

1 
r 

e1 

.. 

221 

I 1 

1 

1 ..... .....

Q me N# u r . .; a-0wm - 4 0 em ,emace I D -

e' I-O~UO 'C C. N C - 0' 

rncmc-e. -=. 7. P-Qu 0 .I- .-3c c e ?N tr-odm :U m,m CN. 

..... i" I I !: .I I.,... im .... .7 

lodoooc cooo: 30 II

1. 

1 nm 

t ­

v N' 

rm 1 

! !I ...... ..*. I if It J... .. DOOOU 00 O80 0'0 0.0 I 30 

I 1 

! i / I 

..... ! i .:.1. ...I NVI 30.000 NNe- )c m, 00-w NNam PCI. :I 0 0'

I 

I I 

! 1 mmEC I.5 ! I

!i 

.#.-. .!.s. ..1 

0;ooo 0000

i

:.I 

! I OO!.: ..I. 

rn yi,

r.A ­ . .- IE 0' ' C 

ii 1 .... Ii zl .T 30 

i Icb. OOT -.'-.... 

I

-­ .n ovuu 

IS 

iqooc I.!.

I 

+o I. oic I ,
222 

I 

..... 3 

. " .a 

0 = o'c r e *mQ@ fauo 2 3 rr-.r-Fl 9=*r 3 

... 

0; 

IC..,. ,mmno 4111 0 

..c: I IONUI- :g! IG-YINrn 

IelWQm a 0, 

lcN-I 

1 I ..i . .I.. 1 . .. 0 0: 

, "i'lc.I .i . 1' .;. .... l rI ! .. 1

\ 0 0: )OOo:O 00 I!

I.00 .. 

..'t ......;

.

;d!oJ. olo lo010 0 4 010

I * OI1 

...... .. L 

* 

4.-

.. h I-,.- m.O dd c -' <m-Iv:C CD s.0 um-tmr- 99 * e., 5 cia.*.a ;1: 0'0 1: I

Id *j 0'03: Ola 

;Odd:; I 

I . i; . ..:. 30000 

...... 

D 010 0:O 

I' ij ! 

I. I 
223 

....... 

>0030ao 

.*..,. !I . 3aooocso 

.. ........ 6 dl 3 ouooo 3 54 s - 8 

m, 5 1 

/I ..1

"io' 

.*1 . 

Oi: "io .,.I. I. ......

0 0 0'0 d 0 0 

!.. ....... 0.c 

I 

.i .

lo 

... 1 Qc. Q 

... 

O/O

.. 1 00 

c;,id 

I 

-. f - S..U -I 

-In 

V). *.ff
224 
'TO1 

. . 

225 

* . 

I

I 

I" 

.-..1. 1 3 4. 

> c 

;1d? ......... C

qdr .. OOC 

ooc 53' 

I 1 c ... c 

J. 3000, 

0.0 c c

ocroo,oc *]I 1

I ..?. ...I :o0.0 0'0 0 0 2

! ...... 2 

C 

..... c 

C 

c 

c 

c 

C 

J 

\

-
,;qd 

226 

11

1 

i 

i ! 

* I 

:"i"sd I *.e.

;d- > C >E J 3C 1 0.00.0

I .. .. 0.00,o .

>mi--9 1.1. ..'. .... 3C :II 3

30: !- -0 u c 

r DU P 

.- -3- .p >crumm !$ 3 rom -mmmw

I I* 

rn . Dam3 c 

r -Y D i. ..r rn Q,c-*!a 

li a o1 

I 

i

jd ..... c ac 3 

0.0 J. 3C >O'OCO 

......

..:! !J 1. 0 0 

. I 

i: 

0 

...... oflo 

1 

/ j *I e. I::i i O!O.

0.I 0. .. i

1 

i

1. ..... .... J C

i

;I30 

0 

.....i . i'T 'I 

a :*40.u C DO P 0.0 40 >O,COO 0.0 30 4 .amor- c tc > .u2 4eaom r -c r 

; I 8n *mOm'vI m -Y D I 

- if .. . .'

I 1 ...... .. 1 1 ..... Ii .... 

. >oooo 0:o0.0 3 0.0 3 0I

I 

I

i3 C JC > io 

'i I: 

I1 .. 

i 

I !. 

Ii

.. ...... * .!. 

.- ~ 

0 

..#. .I . c >e 3 0.00 0 

.. '0 acooo 00 0'0 3 I * 

'Oi i 

I

1 I! .C . .:. *. . ... .... .* ...... .... 

a

Oi

I V 10,oo!o

J. >03 0.0 c;c 

3e, 33.000 qo0.0 i ,I

, * I 

0'00:o , .I .I . OOOlO .. 

;; .. ;id 0 

.. > I. 00000 

.i. J. 

I a 

= 0, 

Oi 

I ...... 

.. e,. 

1

! i! .. I

I .... ... :0 O O'O ,io 

I 0'00.0 0 0. 

I 0000 

!I 1. 

1. = .

OI 

.:. ...... ..... .... 

0 0'3 5 c;o0 

0- 0,3e 0 

I" ooor C.. 

. 1: 

I I -a .... .. / I a 

0 0 3'0 3 0 O!> 3 0;o0 0 : 0.3 oia 1 ..... I ' ..... I / ... d'r; 0 00 0.0' 0:ooc 

O =i2

1: d ;I& 0 =.- --a ----.- I --1- I 

-I, 

I' 

: I.i. -I-u vv15 c 'UL) V'U I IVUUUfl 

d3U -I.=-Ip 4 ~a-r31 -. 

..' - f 

..I" .W .iy Y.Ln , .> 

00-'r Y m:a 0 0 &LO! \ u1 WIU h 

..p e e: VI."'0: :.TI & 

.VI- ..I0 8 VIVI. i

I 
227 

" 

;T.!. 0 O. c T. 0 O...T 

00.2

# I l o 1.1. IOOC 14I 
--- 

. 228 

uc 0 I. 4 

ut ? ut 0 rl# u Q

. 

n 

. .t 

m 

doqo I.!.

I.!. 

ao olo i I i t 

.j.i. 

OdOOO ....I. Po 

.... 

0 d 00.0 

4 
229 

I 
230 

.. 

c. 

0 

... 

Yl-ll-I 

.c a3.J* c UJ* I Y rv:cI

I" 

, --­

w c

0 

n 

F 
231 

iI 

1 

f 

! 

1 

i 

I 

1 

i 

4 
232 

1' 

.-...!. 50 De r, 4. 

2'- n. 50 VI 

2.i 6. -

!

.;. .! 

i . D' ni h 

. 300 D 

r-

..:I . 90.0 DC 

i 0: 

.Aoc 

.. 

e ­

t-2 

.-..­ . GI)

e ­ a l-.= 

' -n 

; -! N 

I 
2 33 
234 

I . *'. *. .. 
2 35 

APPENDIX F 

Addition31 errors found in the 316(b). 
____ 

2 36 

Chapter 3 

p. 3.2-3: There is no Figure 3.1-3 or any detailed illustration of the 

discharge structure as indicated below in Section 3.2~4. 

3.2.4 

The condenser cooling water from all four units is discharged to a common 

overflow canal, varying uidths and 

. constant bottom north oi the East Front 

Street bridge, the recirculation gates.

Here the heated effluent can be directed either south through the discharge

canal (approximately 5,800 It x 560 ft) to Lake Erie or north through the 

lla&illan Road canal (approximately 1,400 ft long by 160 it wide) to the 

Raisin River. 

Table 3.3-1: 2328 MW is given as the maxhum net capacity. The table, 

however, lists several capacity values that exceed 2328 MW. It appears 

that the maximum is 2528 MW, not 2328 MW. 

Table 3.3-3: The area of 1251.0 f t2 given for calculating velocity 

in front of the screens is incorrect. (572.27-546.0) (8)(10)= 2101.6 ft2 

The velocity of 0.77 ft/sec is correct however. 

TABU 3.3-3 IMAKE VUOcIn CALCOLATIOH AT EACU SCREENtl5USE. 

1 INT 

Urn April 1975-April 1976 water level x 572.27 f't 

Screen bottom clevatioa = s06.0 tt 

Sldmer wall bottom elsvstlon = 560.0 f't 

P .;maximum flou posslble/screenhouse = 1.624.2 ft'/sec 

lumber of acreens r 8 

Screen uldth 8 '10.0 It 

Scrwnuell uldth 1 11.11 rt 

1. Calculation of Velocity Directly in Front ot Scrccno 

Screen 

[it') Level tft) Elevation (It) 

> 8 (572.27 tt - 546.0 ft) (8) (10 ft) Z6-2 
Table 3.3-3 (cont'd) 237 

2. Caloulmtioo of Velvity Put SUar Yall 

A Crass-stctlon of scrteauell (re') = 

Skier wall Scrtca 

Bottom 

A a (560 - 5461 (�1 111.17 it1 = 1251.0 ft' 

8 Qf& L 1.30 h/asc.

1.251.C It 

Chapter 4 

p. 4.2-17: According to the Literature Cited section, the reference to 

"Hartman (b)'I should be "Hartman (a)'*. 

p. 4.2-26: Clupeid dersity in paragraph Q1 is 900/100 m3 , not 9OO/m3 . 

p. 4.2-27: The smelt tata mentioned is not listed in Table 4.2-31. 

p. 4.2-27: The Cole (1975a) reference is not listed in the Literature 

Cited section. The correct reference is evidently Cole 11976a). 

p. 4.3-4: It is statEd that: 

As indicated in Table 4.3-3, yellow perch impingement in 1972 was characterized by two peaks: in October (36,7041,and in April (28,350). 

whereas, Table 4.3-3 (shown below) indicates that impingement peaked 

in October and August. 

Socflca 

Clzzara shad 

Rklnbow smtlt 

ShlEers 

Yallcyc

,-> Xtllow perch

Yhitt Sass 

Channel catfish 

Coho salmon 

Rock baa3 

Smallmouth boa 

freahuater arum Yhite crappie 

sunfish 

Northern plks

Broun bullhead 

Goldfish 

Carp

Steelhted trout Suckers 

Other5 

Totals 

dpLtlay &cle rzvLEduessQL POG 

(15 40 a28 99 114,793 6.580 233.275 

19 

93.000 1 1.732 1,479 6,671 1.500 78 12 

7,530 7,4QO 14.460 4 15,360 3,185 

s2 99 378 1,140 108 16 

62 6 

9 6 

12 56 15 6 

9 6 12 16 

39 849 1.359 155 502 501 31 6 16 

90 202 6 16 6 90 68 54 25 

120 a7 21 53 19 ai 07 12 6 

59 12 9 30 l2 18 

1,800 1,333

3 6 

108 

12 

31 

$6 

87 

I 

30 

9 

31 

38 

78 

3 

90 38 

21-3 . 6 

10 

123.057 3,058 1388.055 

3 6 3 1s 
2 38 

p. 4.4-2: The volume of the entrainment sampling pumps is listed as 

2.016 x 106 gal/day. 530 l/min = 2.016 x 105 gal/day, not 2.016 x 106 . 

Table 4.1-1: According to 316(b) p. 

whose presence was noted one or more 

sampling effort"' from 1972-1976. 

bamun= 

Sfirer*bmpret. 

Sei-Ismprey 

Laasnose Kar 

Bovrin 

Alauffe 

OlZurd abrd 

coho ralmon 

Chinook salmon 

kinlwau trout blnbou smelt 

Central rudmlnnou 

lorthern plke

Golaf Ish 

brp

Golden sblner 

Emerald shlner 

Spottall shiner 

Elwitnose mlnnou 

( Creek Chub 

Quillback 

yhito aucker 

Elack bullhead 

Yellow bullhead 

Broun bullbend 

Channel catflsh 

Stonecat 

Tadpole mdtoa 

Brladled madtom 

Trout-perch 

Burbot 

Brook alloorside 

Ute perch

yhite bass 

Dock bass 

Oreen runfish 

Pumpklnseed 

BlUCKill 

Sm&llwuth bass 

Largemouth baas 

Ute crappie

Black crappie 

Johnn~darter 

Yellou perch 

togwrcb

Ualleye

Imahmtrr &UO 

4.1-5, this table lists "all species ,--, 

times during the monitoring period 

,-

I ­

lota: Species list includes flsh impinged and entrained; also those 

'removed by nets or br pump. fer some collectiona, an19 6roup 

CO.DDD names were used lncludle~crap2le. black tass. gar. sucker. 

.ad suafish. Because these group names were sometines used. 

addltlons ta the above species llst we not possible. 
2 39 

Comparison of the table with the Monroe data base, however, revealed 

several discrepancies. For example, the creek chub is listed in the table, 

but neither the impingeiient nor the entrainment records show it occurring 

at the intake. Accordi:ig to the data base, the common shiner, muskellunge, 

and blue catfish were iinpinged, but these species are not listed in Table 

4.4-1. Three additional species--shorthead redhorse, slimy sculpin, and 

silver chub--are listed in the 316(a) demonstration (Table 3-51, Cole 

1976; Table 4.2-5, DetrDit Edison 1976) but are not listed in the table. 

Table 4.2-5: Accordins to the Literature Cited section,the reference 

to "Hartman (b)'I shou.lt be "Hartman (a)" -

Table 4.2-8: 316(b) frils to indicate, as done in VanVooren et al., 

1975, that the 1974 YO1 yellow perch catch is heavily weighted. 

98%of the catch for t1.e entire season came from one tow at the Cedar 

Point station {personal communication, D. H. Davies, 9-6-77). 

Table 4.2-9 : The life stage labeled. "young" should be "young-of -the-year" . 

Table 4.2-11: Gill ne:: total catch for longnose gar is 3, not 0. 

Table 4.2-13: The spr:.ng collection labeled as a gill net is really 

a trawl that was mislabeled. Most of the values, however, were added 

into the correct total column. 

Table 4.2-13: Mean eP:2 for rainbow smelt is 0.6, not 0.8. 

Table 4-2-13: Mean CP:I for white crappie is 1.4, not 0.8. 

Table 4.2-14: The yelLow perch catches by age class for station 12 

do not add up to 1283. 
240 

Table 4.2-14: On the computer printouts we received from the DNa,,the 

freshwater drum total for station 14 had been changed from 390 to 410. 

This changes the CPE from 78 to 82, the catch over all age groups from 

662 to 682, and the mean CPE from 66 to 68. 

Table 4.2-14: One of the 1230 young-of-the-year gizzard shad in the 

station 14 trawl should be listed as a yearling or possibly an adult. 

Table 4.2-14: All 54 smelt in station 12 trawl should be listed as YOY. 

Table 4.2-15: All totals are displaced from the correct species by 

0 

one line. 

Table 4.2-15: Station 12 trawl data for smelt should include 10 adults 

not listed in the table. 

Table 4.2-15: Station 14 trawl for smelt YOY should be 9, not 2. This ryields a total catch of 9, not 2, and a CPE of 3.0, not 0.4. The totals 

and mean CPE over all age groups are therefore also wrong. 

Table 4.2-15: 316b) shows all 5 trout-perch in station 12 trawl. as 

YOY. The DNR printouts show both YOY and yearlings. 

Table 4.2-15: 25 trout-perch caught in station 14 trawl have been 

omitted. The trawl total thus is 30, not 5, and mean CPE is 4.7, not 

0.5. 

Table 4.2-16: 316(b) indicates no sampling was done in the fall. Cole's 

data, however, show that there was sampling done in the fall and that 

shiners and white bass were caught. 
241 

Table 4.2-19: The 197C estimates are incorrect because of the mislabeling 

error in Table 4.2-10. Most of the 1970-75 means are therefore also 

wrong, but only by 1-49. 

Table 4.2-19: The 197:. smelt estimate is wrong (should be 61,000 not 

70,000) because of the incorrect CPE value in Table 4.2-14. 

Table 4.2-19: The 197,1 estimate for freshwater drum is incorrect 

(should be 5,953,000 n3t 5,761,000) because of the error in Table 4.2-14. 

Table 4.2-19: The 197; smelt estimate is low (should be 532,000 not 

419,000) because of thz error made in Table 4.2-15. 

Table 4.2-19: The 1973 trout-perch estimate is greatly underestimated 

(410,000 not 44,000) bxause of the 25 fish omitted in Table 4-2-15, 

Table 4.2-20: 1974 frzshwater drum estimate is incorrect (from Table 

4.2-19) -

Table 4.2-20: 1975 smslt estimate is incorrect (from Table 4.2-19). 

Table 4.2-20: 1975 trxat-perch estimate is wrong (from Table 4.2-19). 

Table 4.2-20: There are several other errors in the age class divisions 

arising from errors in Tables 4.2-14 and 4.2-15. 

Table 4.2-21: August 1-4 estimate for gizzard shad is reported by CLEAR 

as 9.5 x lo5, not 9.5 x 109. The mean value, however, is correct. 

Peak shad population thus appears to be in early June instead of in 

August as reported on p. 4.2-25. 
-- 

242 

Table 4.2-25: July 2 count for station 8 (bottom) is 0.4, not 1.4. 

Table 4.2-26: July 2 count for station 10 (surface) is 35.0, not 33.8. 

Table 4.2-31: All data for station P-16 is displaced from the carrect 

species column. 

Figure 4.2-1: According to 316(b) Literature Cited, the reference 

should be Hartman (a), not Hartman tb). 

Chapter 5 

p. 5.2-1: Gizzard shad are said to make up 51.8% of the impingement 10s 

Calculations of extrapolated impingement losses of fish at the Monroe 

power Plant over a 12-month period are presented in Subsection 4.3.2. An 

estimated total of 861,000 fish uere impinged during this time, of which 

01.8 percent were gizzard shaQand 14.2 percent uere yellow perch. The 

third moat frequently impinged fish uere shiners, uhich comprised 12.7 

percent of the calculated 12-month total. 

, -

However, according to p. 4.3-1 and Table 4.3-1, gizzard shad comprised 

of impinged fish. 

,-. 

fminaement at the Monroe Power Plant uas extrapolated to 861,000 fish 

1976 (Table 4.3-1). Of this 

14.2 percent were yellow perch,

spp.), 7.0 percent were freshwater 

drum, and 4.3 percent were white bass. Other species were impinged less 

frequently. 
243 

.-> 

u 

Gitzara ahad 

Aleuitc 

Rslnbou salt 

Shiners 

trouf-pcrch

Logperch 

Yil1et.c 

-1e:low perch 

bhlte bua 

73 

117 

122 14434 

'113 

47 

6 

47331 206 

11552 

211 

53 10184 

37 

52 

104 

889s 

3689 

4981h 18875 15801 T 81 1298 e 1928 11613 I2631 12679 55 120 233 37 140 369 121 9.3 ~ S 35551 129P2 3164 13492 12921 5224 

29060 

627 

2690 

6056 46 

221 

36 

1974 

739 

83239 76 

69P 

8191 15 

39 

14 1341 

366 

100719 143463 261197 9 472 227 609 6590 9689 2688 616 946 601 4 6 

5% 8 1436 3378 992 122 224 23 

a 1.3 

0.8 

11359 (1159 

1658 5583 158 322 8998 5348 

63 116 1966 47 12.7 

0.6 

0.1 

(0.1

d4.2 12 -3 3777 49 

160 74 

QS9

122301 

31235 4.3 

Chncnel cmtfinh 60 66 64 204 31 10 186 79 364 15 29 20 1128 0.1 

CMO rdwn 2 2 a.1

ROek ML5 64 28 21 27 15 9 29 5 83 83 56 360 tO.l 

ScaliaouZh bass 3 4 2 16 3 6 34 <0.1 

freabwarer arua 7704 3187 14021 11799 10548 lS0U 2258 C87 1227 124 738 1051 60548 1.G 

VhitC crapplc 

Sunfirn 

8 

129 31 25 31 13 31 61 83 23 

fP 

55 

169 25 34 2 38 20 36 

40 19 

34 29 

(0.1

0.1 ' 

2eg

783 Uorrbers pike

Broun bullhead 

Yellow bullhead 

3 

2 

11 

4 

'", 

3 

3 7 ? 

24 10 16 

15 6 

2 

9 9 

ID9 (0.1

8 

75 

(0.1

40.1 

GcXTiah 

Largcetuth bas 

cnmoou ULWS 

77 

1 

102 53 10 3 6 

73 

2 

3 

8 

3 

95 

'1 

484 639 685 

3

--- '836 92 

6 2754 24 

10 

0.3 

(0.1

<O.l Carp 

sucrera 

Other* 

2 

5 11 

21 2

1 -a2

2 8 36 641 35 

5 0.1 

(0.1

(0.1 

$4 3 3 5 

1'12 

752 

41 

1? 

Total3 l1911 4W3 12497f 76248 52232 110896 161509 32213 29572 1/92? E61231

p. 5.3-3: Maximum staniing crop of gizzard shad is 2.9 X log1 not 9.5 x 109, 

due to error in Table 4.2-21. 

p. 5.3-4: Minimum percsnt of gizzard shad larvae lost is 0.3, not 0.1, 

due to error in Table 4.2-21. 

Table 5.2-2: Ohio fall 1974 eetimate for shiners is overestimated 

(46,343,000 instead of 82,913,000) by an apparent error in Table 4.2-18. 

Table 5.2-2: Most of the Michigan 1970-75 means are incorrect because 

of transfer from Table 4.2-19. 

Table 5.2-2: Michigan fall 1975 estimates for trout-perch and smelt 

are incorrect by transEer from Table 4-2-20, 
-- -- 

-- 

-- 

-- 

I 

I 

-- -- -- 

-- 

-- I 

244 

Table 5.2-2: Michigan fall 1975 estimate for shiners is not the sme 

as listed in Table 4.2-20 from which it supposedly came. 

Table 5.2-3: Estimates listed for smelt and freshwater drum are incorrect 

by transfer from Table 5.2-2. The percentage impinged is therefore 

incorrect for these 2 species. 

Table 5.3-1: CLEAR weekly maximUm for shad is 2.9 x 109 not 9.5 x 109. 

Percentage entrained is thus 0.3, not 0.1. 

I 

1.9 

1.9 9 1.o 1.o 0.9 0.7 

- e - 1.3 0.3 1.'I 0.J 

0.5 249.6 * U.8

­ 0.1 35.5 

to tea nti. 

Table 5.3-1: CLEAR mean value for walleye should be 2.5 x 105 from 

-..-

Table 4.2-21 below. This results in the tabulated percentage entrained 

of 163.7%. The 2.2 x 105 value yields 186.0%. 

- mr AI Jlme aD8 Jub. a19 JUT AW. m- A2=u2kzSkL Uak23J3.l .u& aa0L-A' 

-

DirzaM b.Qd -(b) 4.1 1 le* 2.9 x io' 3.1 x 10' 1.3 r 10' 8.3 I 10. 1.2 x 10' 1.4 x 10' 5-1 E 10' 

YllnbM amlt 3.8 -I lo' 3.5 I 90' 3.5 I IO' 2.6 x 10' 1.6 r 10' 2.5 x 10' 3.8 x M' L? I 10' 8.3 x 10' 

Carbld ahlner - 7.4 x 10' 6.J I 10' 5.1 x 10: 5.3 I 10' 8.3 I 10' 1.2 -

1 10' 7.6-

x 1D' 2.0 x 10' 

SpDtCall shiner 3.v I 10' 3.7 a 10' 6.0 x 10 T.6 I 10' 2.3 X 10' 2.2 r 10' 

vrcinucar arm 3.1 I 10' 2.1 I 10. 1.0 x lo' T.O x 10' 4.9 I 10' 1.0 -

a io* -

- 2.I I IO' 

l*lloY parch 8.1 10' T.5 x 10. 1.1 x 10' 1.3 I 10' 2.0 I 10' - 2.6 M' 

mite Bmsa - 1.3 I 10' 7.1 - 10' 2.0 I 10' 3.2 1 10' 1.6 n 10' 1.1 -io* 

__9 Wleya - 1.1 I 10' I 7.4 x 10. 

iiwire 3.8 I 10' 1.1 I 10' 2.3 a 10' 1.01- 10' 

tormrcb - - . J.9 I 10' 1.9 a 10' 5.3 I 10' 

a. pram am. U0PUblIBh.d MCI &L.. 

b. 1Uh.a 1MlEmta 1a.ufflalml &La. 

e. Ibla -C nb clluy.d tu 4 to 6 to o~mot111 m7aT 00 th auld Ubh. 
245 

Table 5.3-3: The number; of alewife and shad larvae entrained are not 

the same as those in Table 5.3-1 

5.7-7 P--

Population 

So. of Larvae Adult EatLmnte s Lost to fable 

SDecies Entratned -(a1 -(b) ~eference(0) 

Aleuife 

p_3 Gizzard ahad 

Rainbon sselt 

Emerald shiner 

Channel catfish 

Lhitc baas 

lellow perch

balleye 

Freshwater drum 

35,619 0.0001 Mean oC 4.2-17 

and 9.2-20 

76,328 0.0007 Hean of 42-77 

ad 4.2-20 

722.821 419 3.8Ce) 4.2-20 

170,299 2,654 0.04 4.2-20 

719,528 1,851 0.2 4.2-20 

391,945 20,815 0.00006 U.2-f7 

4,996.92h ia ,942 0.02 4.2-20 

409I 186 5,500 0.a03 4.2-20 

1,114,515 14,200 0.005 u.2-20 

a. Numbers taken from Table 5.3.2 and generated through 901 model. 

b. Beat estimate based on curreit abundance indices (see rationales 

developed in Subsection 5.2. $1. E. Rationales for estieates in ;hese tables presented in Subsection 4.2. 

d. Used 99.52 model based en Ro:hschllQ 1961. 

e. Estimated percent lost ?.a powlation ts too high if Canadian comwrolul 

harvest information ia consliered (Subsection 5.2.3). 
-- 

3. Recipient's Accession No 

5. Repart Date 

:.:arc;? 1978 

5. 

E. Pedonning 0:ganiration Rept. No. 

.-.-- _-___-__ .__.--

IO. Pmject/TasC/Work Cnil No. 

-. -__. __.- - __ 11. ContractC) or Gnnt(G) No. 

(C) - (GI 

- 13. Type of Report & Period Coverec: 

lementzry uotcs 

-__--- _- - act (Lknit: 200 words) 

evaluation serves (1) as a det3ile2 critique of the S1onrc.e Plant 31G(b) 

Istration;. for use by the field staff and other agencies responsible for reviewin2 

docrunent, am? (2) by way of exmsle, as a guide to assist the field staff in tneir 

!w of 316(bl demonstrations for other Great Lakes region poi.& plants. 

.merit Analysis a. Dcscriplors 

cntifierslOpen-Ended Tcrms 

Erie, F-aisin Xver, fish fish eggs, fish larvae, yelio+j perch, entrainment, 

ngement 

3SATI 4etdlGmug 
Reproduced by NTIS 

NationalTechnical InformationService 

Springfield, VA 22161 

This report wasprinted SpecijZcallyfor your order 

from nearly 3 million titles available in our collection. 

For economy and efficiency,NTlS does not maintain stock of its vast 

collection of technical reports. Rather, most documents are printed for 

each order. Documents that are not in electronic format are reproduced 

from master archival copies and are the best possible reproductions 

available. If you have any questions concerning this document or any 

order you have placed with NTIS, please call our Customer Service 

Department at (703)605-6050. 

About NTIS 

NTlS collects scientific, technical, engineering, and business related 

information -then organizes, maintains, and disseminates that 

information in a variety of formats-from microficheto online services. 

The NTlS collection of nearly 3 million titles includes reports describing 

research conducted or sponsored by federal agencies and their 

contractors;statistical and business information; U.S. military

publications; multimedialtraining products; computer software and 

electronicdatabases developed by federal agencies; training tools; and 

technical reports prepared by research organizationsworldwide. 

Approximately 100,000new titles are added and indexed into the NTlS 

collection annually. 

For more information about NTIS products and services, call NTIS 

at -I-800-553-NTIS (6847)or (703) 605-6000 and request the free 

NTlS Products Catalog, PR-827LPG, or visit the NTlS Web site 

http:\lwww.ntis.gov. 

NTlS 

Your indispensable resource forgovernment-sponsored 

information-US. and worldwide 
- --- 

US. DEPARTMENTOF COMMERCE 

Technology Administration 

Notional TechnicalInformation Service 

Springfield,YA 22161 (703)605-6000 

--_. ... . .. 

*PB~~I 18975" 

"BA" 

BIN: M464 06-26-98 

I NVO ICE: 608796 

SH I PTO : 1"375463 

PAYMENT: CSH*VORNG