alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Dontrey Ray Walker, Appellant

No. 06-22-00167-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 188th District Court of 

Gregg County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 52408-

A). Memorandum Opinion delivered by 

Justice van Cleef, Chief Justice Stevens and 

Justice Rambin participating. 

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. However, we do find error in the bill of costs. Therefore, we delete the assessment of 

$5,227.50 for court-appointed attorney fees from the bill of costs and affirm the trial court’s 

judgment.

We note that the appellant, Dontrey Ray Walker, has adequately indicated his inability to 

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JULY 20, 2023

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

SCOTT E. STEVENS

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 396 

To enable each newly constituted Senate to carry out its responsibility to 

determine the Rules of its Proceedings at the beginning of each Congress. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 25, 2010 

Mr. UDALL of New Mexico submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration 

RESOLUTION 

To enable each newly constituted Senate to carry out its 

responsibility to determine the Rules of its Proceedings 

at the beginning of each Congress. 

Whereas article I, section 5 of the United States Constitution 

provides that ‘‘Each House may determine the Rules of 

its Proceedings’’; 

Whereas it is a longstanding common law principle, upheld 

in Supreme Court decisions, that one legislature cannot 

bind subsequent legislatures; 

Whereas rule V of the Standing Rules of the Senate states 

that ‘‘the Rules of the Senate shall continue from one 

Congress to the next unless they are changed as provided 

in these rules’’; 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 396 IS 

Whereas rule XXII of the Standing Rules of the Senate requires an affirmative vote of two-thirds of Senators 

present and voting to limit debate on a measure or motion to amend the Senate Rules; and 

Whereas rule V and rule XXII of the Standing Rules of the 

Senate, taken together, can effectively deny the Senate 

the opportunity to exercise its constitutional right to determine the Rules of its Proceedings under article I, section 5, thus allowing one Congress to bind its successors: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That upon the expiration of the Standing 

2 Rules of the Senate at the Sine Die Adjournment of the 

3 111th Congress, the Senate shall proceed in accordance 

4 with article I, section 5 of the Constitution to determine 

5 the Rules of its Proceedings by a simple majority vote. 

Æ 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
# Table 8.4

# RSE 8.4

# Microsoft_Word_Document1.docx

# image1.emf

# Microsoft_Word_Document2.docx

# image2.emf
Exhibit 24:    Power of Attorney

The
undersigned directors of The Ryland Group, Inc., a Maryland corporation, constitute and appoint Timothy J. Geckle the true and lawful agent and attorney-in-fact of
the undersigned, with full power and authority in said agent and attorney-in-fact to sign for the undersigned, in their respective names as directors of The Ryland
Group, Inc., the Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Ryland Group, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, and any amendments thereto, to be filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Exchange Act, as amended.

Dated:
February 28, 2008

| |  | /s/ R. Chad DreierR. Chad Dreier, Chairman of the Board,
President and Chief Executive Officer
| |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | Daniel T. Bane, Director                                                                      
| |  | /s/ Leslie M. FréconLeslie M. Frécon, Director                                                
| |  | /s/ Roland A. HernandezRoland A. Hernandez, Director                                          
| |  | /s/ William L. JewsWilliam L. Jews, Director                                                  
| |  | /s/ Ned MansourNed Mansour, Director                                                          
| |  | /s/ Robert E. MellorRobert E. Mellor, Director                                                
| |  | /s/ Norman J. MetcalfeNorman J. Metcalfe, Director                                            
| |  | /s/ Charlotte St. MartinCharlotte St. Martin, Director                                        

---
13520 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 54 / Thursday, March 20, 1997 / Proposed Rules

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

34 CFR Part 668

Student Assistance General Provisions

AGENCY: Department of Education.

ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of

comment period.

SUMMARY: On September 20, 1996, the

Department of Education published in

the Federal Register a notice of

proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for the

Student Assistance General Provisions

(34 CFR Part 668) addressing standards

of financial responsibility (60 FR

49552–49574). The proposed standards

would apply to all institutions that

participate in a program authorized by

title IV of the Higher Education Act of

1965, as amended (title IV, HEA

programs).

On December 18, 1996, the Secretary

published a notice in the Federal

Register (61 FR 66854) reopening the

comment period on particular parts of

the September 20, 1996 NPRM until

February 18, 1997. On February 18,

1997, the Secretary extended the

reopened comment period until March

24 to allow commenters to examine and

comment upon new information that

would be made available through

meetings and other avenues (62 FR

7334).

The Secretary is extending the

comment period for an additional 21

days. The Secretary is doing so to allow

the higher education community to

comment on additional information

regarding the proposed ratio

methodology, and to suggest possible

revisions to that methodology.

DATES: Comments must be received on

or before April 14, 1997.

ADDRESSES: All comments concerning

this notice or the notice of proposed

rulemaking should be addressed to Mr.

David Lorenzo, U.S. Department of

Education, P.O. Box 23272, Washington,

D.C. 20026, or to the following internet

address: fin—resp@ed.gov

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.

David Lorenzo or Mr. John Kolotos, U.S.

Department of Education, 600

Independence Avenue, S.W., Room

3045, ROB–3, Washington, D.C. 20202,

telephone (202) 708–8242. Individuals

who use a telecommunications device

for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal

Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–

800–877–8339 between 8 a.m. and 8

p.m., Eastern standard time, Monday

through Friday.

The additional information referenced

above may be obtained from the

financial responsibility section of the

Department’s web site at the following

URL address: (http://www.ed.gov/

offices/OPE/PPI).

Dated: March 17, 1997.

David A. Longanecker,

Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary

Education.

[FR Doc. 97–7090 Filed 3–19–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
# C_2018203EN.01001601.xml

| 13.6.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 203/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.6.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 203/16

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2018/C 203/05)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 21.4.2018 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 21.4.2018-31.12.2018 |
| Member State | Denmark |
| Stock or Group of stocks | SRX/03A-C. including RJN/03A-C., RJH/03A-C. and RJM/03A-C. |
| Species | Skates and rays (rajiformes) |
| Zone | Union waters of 3a |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 09/TQ120 |

Date and time of closure

21.4.2018

Duration

21.4.2018-31.12.2018

Member State

Denmark

Stock or Group of stocks

SRX/03A-C. including RJN/03A-C., RJH/03A-C. and RJM/03A-C.

Species

Skates and rays (rajiformes)

rajiformes

Zone

Union waters of 3a

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

09/TQ120

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1998
<CASH>                                          (4830)
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    37883
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 37883
<PP&E>                                          130516
<DEPRECIATION>                                (120701)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  113842
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2333929
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    1200000
<COMMON>                                        399431
<OTHER-SE>                                   (3819518)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    113842
<SALES>                                           3901
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 39901
<CGS>                                             8689
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   146587
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (79325)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (186011)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.005)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### State v. Warden

111,714

06/21/2016

Denied.

Unpubhshed
#### State v. Gohring

108,498

10/28/13

Denied. ...

Unpublished
No. 12-5621.

#### Williams *v.*Jackson, Warden, et al.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.1



          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of FIRST
MONTAUK FINANCIAL CORP. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending
December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Victor K. Kurylak, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.




/s/ Victor K. Kurylak
------------------------------------------
Victor K. Kurylak
President and Chief Executive Officer
May 4, 2007
# m94_15
# Table 2.1

# RSE 2.1

# Microsoft_Word_Document1.docx

# image1.emf

# Microsoft_Word_Document2.docx

# image2.emf
Exhibits
**Exhibit 23.1**
**Consent of Registered Independent PublicAccountants**We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8(No. 333-7590) of Royal Dutch Petroleum Company and The“Shell” Transport and Trading Company, Public LimitedCompany of our report dated May 22, 2004, except for Note2(b) (Second Restatement of previously issued financialstatements) and Note 18 (Subsequent events), which are as ofMarch 3, 2005 relating to the Financial Statements of RoyalDutch Petroleum Company which is included in this AmendmentNo. 2 to the 2003 Annual Report on Form 20-F.
/s/ KPMG Accountants N.V.---------------------------------------------------------------
**KPMG Accountants N.V.****The Hague — TheNetherlands**
March 3, 2005 **E 2 **RoyalDutch/Shell Group of Companies 20-F/A (Amendment No. 2) 2003
<PAGE>   1



                                                                    EXHIBIT 11

STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                 1997        1996         1995
                                                 ----        ----         ----
<S>                                           <C>          <C>         <C>
Computation of basic earnings per share

   Weighted average number of shares of
    common stock outstanding                   3,401,818   3,387,818    3,353,202
                                              ==========  ==========   ==========

Net income                                    $3,258,000  $5,095,000   $1,884,000
                                              ==========  ==========   ==========

Basic earnings per share                      $     0.96  $     1.50   $     0.56
                                              ==========  ==========   ==========

Computation of diluted earnings per share

   Weighted average number of shares of
    common stock outstanding                   3,401,818   3,387,818    3,353,202
   Dilutive stock options                        191,133     192,052      173,072
                                              ----------  ----------   ----------
                                               3,592,951   3,579,870    3,526,274
                                              ==========  ==========   ==========

Net income                                    $3,258,000  $5,095,000   $1,884,000
                                              ==========  ==========   ==========

Diluted earnings per share                    $     0.91  $     1.42   $     0.53
                                              ==========  ==========   ==========
</TABLE>



                                        7
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 17, 2019.

In The 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

NO. 14-18-00634-CV

MICHAEL NAVARRO AND TAMRA NAVARRO, Appellants 

V.

BASILIO BASQUEZ, Appellee 

On Appeal from the County Court 

Lee County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 3435 

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 

This is an appeal from a judgment signed June 18, 2018. The clerk’s record 

was filed July 5, 2018. The reporter’s record was filed September 14, 2018. 

On November 29, 2018, appellants filed a brief that did not comply with the 

Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. On December 6, 2018, this court struck 

appellants’ brief on the stated grounds that the brief failed to comply with the rules. 

Specifically, we noted that appellants failed to (1) state concisely all issues presented 
2

for review, (2) provide a succinct, clear, and accurate statement of the arguments 

made in the body of the brief, and (3) set forth a clear and concise argument for the 

contentions made with appropriate citations to authorities and to the record. See Tex. 

R. App. P. 38.1(f), (h), and (i).

The court’s order stated that unless appellants filed a complying brief on or 

before December 17, 2018, the court would dismiss the appeal for want of 

prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

Appellants filed no brief or other response. Accordingly, we dismiss the 

appeal.

 PER CURIAM 

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jewell and Bourliot.
| (1)   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  DATE:      May 15, 2008 |  /s/ James E.      Rouse         |
|-------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                          | James      E. Rouse                                                           |
|                          | President      andChief      Executive Officer                                |

----
**Exhibit 99.6**
In connection with the Amendment No. 2 onForm 20-F/A of The “Shell” Transport and TradingCompany, p.l.c., a public limited company organized under thelaws of England (the “Company”) for the period endingDecember 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each ofthe undersigned officers of the Company certify pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to suchofficer’s knowledge, that:
1.the Amendment No.2 fully complies, in all    material respects, with the requirements of Section 13(a)    or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and     2.the information contained in the    Amendment No.2 fairly presents, in all material respects,    the financial condition and results of operations of the Company    as of, and for, the periods presented in the Amendment No.2.    
The foregoing certification is provided solelyfor purposes of complying with the provisions ofSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is notintended to be used or relied upon for any other purpose.
Dated March 3, 2005
/s/ Malcolm Brinded---------------------------------------------------------------**Malcolm Brinded****Managing Director**
/s/ Peter Voser---------------------------------------------------------------**Peter Voser****Chief Financial Officer** **E 14**      Exhibits 20-F/A (Amendment No. 2) 2002
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.

UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL

AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

IN THE

ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent,

v.

RONALD LEE MANNING, Petitioner.

No. 1 CA-CR 23-0161 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Mohave County

No. S8015CR2000598

The Honorable Douglas Camacho, Judge Pro Tem

REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL

Mohave County Attorney’s Office, Kingman

By Amanda Claerhout

Counsel for Respondent

Ronald Lee Manning, Florence

Petitioner

FILED 11-28-2023
STATE v. MANNING

Decision of the Court

2

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Presiding Judge Jennifer B. Campbell, and Judges Kent E. Cattani and Anni 

Hill Foster delivered the decision of the Court.

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Petitioner Ronald Lee Manning seeks review of the superior 

court’s order denying his petition for post-conviction relief. This is 

petitioner’s fourth petition.

¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will 

not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief. 

State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is petitioner’s burden to 

show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition 

for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 537, 538, ¶ 1 (App. 

2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review).

¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior 

court’s order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, the petition for 

review, State’s response, and Petitioner’s reply. We find that petitioner has 

not established an abuse of discretion. 

¶4 We grant review but deny relief.
Exhibit 31.1



Certification Pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
for the Chief Executive Officer



|I, Thomas W. Dickson, certify that:
|-----------------------------------
|                                   
|1.                                 
|                                   
|2.                                 
|                                   
|                                   

|/s/ Thomas W. Dickson            |  | 
|-------------------------------- |  | 
|Name: Thomas W. Dickson         
|Title: Chairman of the Board and
|Chief Executive Officer         
|(Principal Executive Officer)   
|                                 |  | 
|Date:
    January 24, 2014      
|                                 |  |
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

CRYSTAL HENDREN,

 

 Appellant,

v.

GABRIEL LAZAR,

Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-21-00141-CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 5

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2020DCV3449)

O R D E R

After reviewing this case, the Court has determined that further briefing is necessary to 

properly assess its jurisdiction. Therefore, we ORDER Appellant to, within 7 days of the date of 

this order, file a letter brief with this Court addressing whether the trial court's order constitutes 

an appealable interlocutory order. Appellee’s response, if any, will be due within 5 days of the 

filing of Appellant's letter brief.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 7th day of December, 2021.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox and Alley, JJ.
| Home > Households, Buildings & Industry >Transportation Surveys > Household Vehicles Energy Use > Figure ES7 |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                              |