alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 15


To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
  Logistics Management Resources, Inc.

We have reviewed the accompanying balance sheet of Logistics Management Resources,
  Inc. as of March 31, 2004, and the related statements of operations, shareholders’
  equity (impairment), and of cash flows for the three months ended March 31,
  2004 and 2003. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's
  management.

We conducted our reviews in accordance with standards established by the American
  Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim financial information
  consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial data and
  making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters.
  It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with
  generally accepted auditing standards, the objective of which is the expression
  of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly,
  we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
  be made to the accompanying consolidated financial statements in order for them
  to be in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

As discussed in our report dated March 25, 2004, certain conditions indicate
  that the company may be unable to continue as a going-concern. The accompanying
  financial statements do not include any adjustments to the financial statements
  that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going-concern.

/s/ Rosenberg Rich Baker Berman & Company

Bridgewater, New Jersey
  May 15, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT 
<LEGEND>   THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE CONDENSED STATEMENT OF CONSOLIDATED INCOME,
BALANCE SHEET AND CASH FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY 
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<CIK> 0000086521
<NAME>  SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000 
        
<S>                             <C> 
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1998 
<PERIOD-END>                                  DEC-31-1998 
<BOOK-VALUE>                                     PER-BOOK 
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                           2,300 
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                           498 
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                                696 
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                              756 
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                          7 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      4,257 
<COMMON>                                              291 
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                             566 
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                                   267 
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                      1,124 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  25 
<PREFERRED>                                            78 
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                                1,491 
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                      0 
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                               0 
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                          0 
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                          66 
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                               0 
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                            57 
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                        6 
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                      1,410 
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                       4,257 
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                           2,749 
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                                  133 
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                          2,330 
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                          2,463 
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                               286 
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                     21 
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                        307 
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              116 
<NET-INCOME>                                          191 
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                             6
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                         185 
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                              319 
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                              96 
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                                535 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           0 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           0 

         



</TABLE>
S95A0333.

#### SMITH et al. v. TRAVIS PRUITT & ASSOCIATES, P.C.

(455 SE2d 586)

Hunstein, Justice.

After a bench trial, the trial court, pursuant to OCGA § 18-2-22 (2) and (3), declared a conveyance of residential property from Mark Smith to his wife, Angie Smith, null and void and set it aside, allowed a judgment lien of Mark Smith’s judgment creditor, Travis Pruitt & *348Associates, P.C., to attach to the property, and awarded Travis Pruitt expenses of litigation and attorney fees in the amount of $7,000. The Smiths appeal.

Decided April 10, 1995.

*Joseph D. Young,*for appellants.

*Webb & Daniel, Laurie W. Daniel, Harold T. Daniel, Sr.,*for ap-pellee.

1. “It is well established that whether a [conveyance] was made with the intent to delay or defraud creditors is a question of fact for the [factfinder] to decide from all of the circumstances of the case. [Cit.]” *Goodman v. Lewis,*247 Ga. 605, 606 (1) (277 SE2d 908) (1981). Our review of the transcript reveals that the evidence adduced authorized the trial court to find that Mark Smith conveyed the property to Angie Smith with the intention to delay or defraud his creditors and that sufficient grounds for reasonable suspicion of his intent existed. See *Merrell v. Beckwith,*263 Ga. 779 (1) (439 SE2d 488) (1994). Accordingly, the trial court did not err by declaring the conveyance null and void and setting it aside pursuant to OCGA § 18-2-22 (2). We therefore do not find it necessary to reach appellants’ enumeration regarding the factual findings to support the trial court’s ruling regarding the application here of OCGA § 18-2-22 (3).

2. We agree with appellants that the trial court erred by awarding appellee attorney fees. Appellee’s counsel stated in his place that fees in the case “will exceed ten thousand dollars.” Although counsel proposed submitting to the trial court “documentation of what has been done in the case and how that figure was arrived at,” no such documentation is present in the record and there is no evidence of the number of hours spent on the case or the hourly fee charged, no testimony from other attorneys or other evidence to show what constituted a reasonable attorney fee in light of the litigation history of the case. “In short, the conclusory testimony of [appellee’s] counsel is the only evidence of attorney fees, and it is insufficient.” *Hughes v. Great Southern Midway,*265 Ga. 94 (1) (454 SE2d 130) (1995).

*Judgment affirmed in part and reversed in part.*

*All the Justices concur.*
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 13

- 00625

- CR

LANNDON FLOYD SMITH

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS
On Appeal from the 377th District Court of Victoria County , Texas Trial Cause No. 13

- 3

- 27221

- D

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered thi s cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. July 24, 2014
No. 12-5758.

#### Mason *v.*Brunsman, Warden.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# C_2018009EN.01000501.xml

| 12.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 9/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 9/5

---

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions given at its meeting of 26 June 2017 regarding a draft decision relating to Case AT.39740 — Google Search (Shopping)

Rapporteur: Cyprus

(2018/C 9/06)

| (1) | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that a fine should be imposed on the addressees of the draft decision. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that a fine should be imposed on the addressees of the draft decision.

| (2) | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the basic amount of the fine set in this case. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the basic amount of the fine set in this case.

| (3) | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that there are no aggravating and no mitigating circumstances applicable in this case. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that there are no aggravating and no mitigating circumstances applicable in this case.

| (4) | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that a multiplier for deterrence should be applied in this case. A majority of Member States agree. One Member State abstains. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that a multiplier for deterrence should be applied in this case. A majority of Member States agree. One Member State abstains.

| (5) | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the final amount of the fine. A majority of Member States agree. One Member State abstains. |
| --- | --- |

(5)

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the final amount of the fine. A majority of Member States agree. One Member State abstains.

| (6) | The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

(6)

The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union.

---
# C_2018105EN.01000101.xml

| 20.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 105/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 105/1

---

Notice for the attention of the persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2013/255/CFSP and in Council Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria

(2018/C 105/01)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons designated in Annex I to Council Decision 2013/255/CFSP (1), as implemented by Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2018/421 (2), and in Annex II to Council Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 (3), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/420 (4), concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria.

1

2

3

4

The Council of the European Union has decided that the persons that appear in the above mentioned Annexes should be included in the list of persons and entities in Annex I to Decision 2013/255/CFSP and Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 36/2012. The grounds for designation of those persons appear in the relevant entries in those Annexes.

The attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated on the websites in Annex III to Regulation (EU) No 36/2012, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 16 of the Regulation).

The persons concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned list should be reconsidered, before 3 April 2018, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

Any observations received will be taken into account for the purpose of the Council’s next review, pursuant to Article 34 of Decision 2013/255/CFSP and Article 32(4) of Regulation (EU) No 36/2012, of the list of designated persons and entities.

The attention of the persons concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council’s decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, 2nd paragraph, and Article 263, 4th and 6th paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 147, 1.6.2013, p. 14.

1

(2)  OJ L 75 I, 19.3.2018, p. 3.

2

(3)  OJ L 16, 19.1.2012, p. 1.

3

(4)  OJ L 75 I, 19.3.2018, p. 1.

4

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,049,826
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  720,278
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,272,440
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,153,298
<PP&E>                                       2,296,339
<DEPRECIATION>                                 863,111
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,721,981
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          585,017
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        31,937
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,191,579
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,721,981
<SALES>                                      1,201,432
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,201,432
<CGS>                                          709,300
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  368,435
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,148
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                152,080
<INCOME-TAX>                                    27,110
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            124,970
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   124,970
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04
        

</TABLE>
#### Stueckemann v. City of Basehor

105,457

10/01/13

Granted.

Unpublished
EXHIBIT 12.1
   1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Copa Holdings, S.A.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;
 4.
    
    The companys other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:
     5.
    
    The companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors
and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
    /s/ Pedro Heilbron
Pedro HeilbronChief Executive Officer
No. 12-6047.

#### Cobb *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000820475
<NAME> INTERNATIONAL META SYSTEMS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         295,117
<SECURITIES>                                 2,037,638
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,132
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,352,907
<PP&E>                                       1,000,923
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,353,830
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          412,732
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                2
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,769
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,353,830
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,266,374
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              45,895
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,220,479)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### State v. Brown

102,940

08/19/13

Denied

Unpublished
No. 12-5615.

#### Johnson *v.*Massachusetts.

App. Ct. Mass. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                        5
<MULTIPLIER>                     1,000

<S>                               <C>              <C>              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     12-mos           12-mos           12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>            Dec-31-1997      Dec-31-1996      Dec-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                 Dec-31-1997      Dec-31-1996      Dec-31-1995
<CASH>                             8,637                0                0
<SECURITIES>                           0                0                0
<RECEIVABLES>                     12,857                0                0
<ALLOWANCES>                       2,231                0                0
<INVENTORY>                       16,104                0                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  39,001                0                0
<PP&E>                            64,216                0                0
<DEPRECIATION>                    27,780                0                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    93,137                0                0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             10,264                0                0
<BONDS>                                0                0                0
<COMMON>                              73                0                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0                0                0
<PREFERRED>                            0                0                0
<OTHER-SE>                        77,771                0                0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      93,137                0                0
<SALES>                           54,207                0                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  54,207                0                0
<CGS>                             38,101                0                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     38,101                0                0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  11,036                0                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       0                0                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 1,576                0                0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    3,494                0                0
<INCOME-TAX>                         849                0                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                2,645                0                0
<DISCONTINUED>                         0                0                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0                0                0
<CHANGES>                              0                0                0
<NET-INCOME>                       2,645                0                0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        .62              .55              .40
<EPS-DILUTED>                        .53              .45              .35


</TABLE>
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 363 

Honoring the life and service of breast cancer advocate, Stefanie Spielman. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 30, 2009 

Mr. VOINOVICH (for himself and Mr. BROWN) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the life and service of breast cancer advocate, 

Stefanie Spielman. 

Whereas Stefanie Spielman, a tremendous advocate and a 

true champion for the cause of breast cancer research, 

passed away on November 19, 2009, after a decade-long 

battle with breast cancer; 

Whereas despite her constant battle with her own illness, 

Stefanie showed grace and compassion for others, touching countless lives in Ohio and beyond; 

Whereas Stefanie tirelessly advocated for additional research 

into the prevention and treatment of breast cancer, and 

along with her husband, Chris, founded the Stefanie 

Spielman Fund for Breast Cancer Research at the Ohio 

State University Comprehensive Cancer Center—James 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 363 IS 

Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute shortly 

after her diagnosis; 

Whereas Stefanie and Chris later established the Stefanie 

Spielman Fund for Patient Assistance, which to date has 

generated more than $6,500,000 to help translate laboratory discoveries into effective treatments for breast cancer patients; 

Whereas Stefanie served as an active and vital member of the 

James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute 

Foundation Board; 

Whereas Stefanie was actively engaged in advocacy issues, including Ohio Mammography Day, which received the 

strong support of former Ohio First Lady Janet 

Voinovich and was designated by the Ohio General Assembly as the third Thursday in October; 

Whereas in 2000, Stefanie and Chris established ‘‘Stefanie’s 

Champions’’ to honor one of the most important factors 

in cancer treatment—the loving and healing presence of 

a devoted caregiver; 

Whereas Stefanie gave the first Champion award to her beloved husband after Chris put his professional football career on hold to care for her when she was first treated; 

and 

Whereas Stefanie was a loving mother to her 4 children: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) acknowledges the outstanding achievements 

3 and profound impact of Stefanie Spielman in the 

4 fight against breast cancer; 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 363 IS 

1 (2) commends Stefanie for her commitment to 

2 caring for others suffering from breast cancer; and 

3 (3) celebrates her life as a wife, mother, and 

4 advocate for breast cancer awareness, research, and 

5 treatment. 

Æ 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS