alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 208 

To constitute the majority party’s membership on certain committees for 

the One Hundred Eleventh Congress, or until their successors are chosen. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 7, 2009 

Mr. REID submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed 

to 

RESOLUTION 

To constitute the majority party’s membership on certain 

committees for the One Hundred Eleventh Congress, or 

until their successors are chosen. 

1 Resolved, That the following shall constitute the ma2 jority party’s membership on the following committee for 

3 the One Hundred Eleventh Congress, or until their succes4 sors are chosen: 

5 COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY: Mr. Leahy (Chair6 man), Mr. Kohl, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Feingold, Mr. Schu7 mer, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Cardin, Mr. Whitehouse, Ms. 

8 Klobuchar, Mr. Kaufman, Mr. Specter, and Mr. Franken. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
#### Blaurock v. State

108,591

09/14/2015

Denied.

Unpublished
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 58 (Wednesday, March 26, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 14391]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-7823]



[[Page 14391]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY: U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.

DATE AND TIME: Friday, April 4, 1997, 9:30 a.m.

PLACE: U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 624 Ninth Street, N.W., Room 
540, Washington, DC 20425.

STATUS:

Agenda

I. Approval of Agenda
II. Announcements
III. Staff Report
IV. State Advisory Committee Reports
    <bullet> Indiana Consultation: Focus on Affirmative Action
    <bullet> Illinois Consultation: Focus on Affirmative Action
    <bullet> Michigan Consultation: Focus on Affirmative Action
    <bullet> Ohio Consultation: Focus on Affirmative Action
    <bullet> Wisconsin Consultation: Focus on Affirmative Action
V. State Advisory Committee Appointments for Alabama, Colorado, 
Connecticut, Idaho, Kansas, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Minnesota, and New 
Jersey.
VI. Racial and Ethnic Tensions in American Communities: Poverty, 
Inequality, and Discrimination--The Miami Report
VII. Future Agenda Items

CONTACT PERSON FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Barbara Brooks, Press and 
Communications (202) 376-8312.
Stephanie Y. Moore,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 97-7823 Filed 3-24-97; 2:40 pm]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-M
No. 12-6056.

#### Chung *v.*United States.

C. A. 2d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
#### Clemmons v. State

110,135

07/27/2015

Denied.

Unpublished
No. 11-1175.

#### Marx *v.*General Revenue Corp.

C. A. 10th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 566 U. S. 1021.] Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as *amicus curiae*and for divided argument granted.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 67 (Tuesday, April 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 16878]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-9044]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD


Sunshine Act Meeting; Notice of Public Meeting

    Notice is hereby given that the Railroad Retirement Board will hold 
a meeting on April 16, 1997, 9:00 a.m., at the Board's meeting room on 
the 8th floor of its headquarters building, 844 North Rush Street, 
Chicago, Illinois, 60611. The agenda for this meeting follows:

Portion Open to the Public

    (1) Reduction in Prepayment Verification Period.
    (2) Revision and Codification of Consolidated Board Orders 
Pursuant to Executive Order 12861.
    (3) Coverage Determinations: A. Union Pacific Distribution 
Services, B. Union Pacific Technology, Inc.
    (4) Regulations--Part 211, Pay for Time Lost--Status Update.
    (5) Year 2000 Issues.
    (6) Labor Member Truth in Budgeting Status Report.

Portion Closed to the Public

    (A) Performance Awards.
    (B) SES Bonuses and SES Pay Level Adjustments.
    (C) Pending Board Appeals:

1. Jimmy W. Bowen
2. C.G. Melton
3. Helen McGinnis
4. John J. McNamara
5. Ruby Brown (96-AP-0004)
6. Michael Cook (96-AP-0036)
7. Lois Y. Dickerson (4233)
8. Thomas G. Johnson (96-AP-0020)
9. Lee C. Mansfield (96-AP-0043)
10. Billy D. LeMay (96-AP-0011)
11. Barbara Rock (96-AP-0044)
12. Mary Ann Wilson (96-AP-0041)

    The person to contact for more information is Beatrice Ezerski, 
Secretary to the Board. Phone No. 312-751-4920.

    Dated: April 3, 1997.
Beatrice Ezerski,
Secretary to the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-9044 Filed 4-4-97; 9:35 am]
BILLING CODE 7905-01-M
# 23q4_origin
#### Schwerdt v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue

110,086

07/27/2015

Denied. ..

Unpublished
# t4p01p1
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 68 (Wednesday, April 9, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 17136-17137]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-8970]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[MN40-01-6988b; FRL-5694-5]


Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plan; 
Minnesota; Enhanced Monitoring

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to 
approve a revision to the Minnesota State Implementation Plan (SIP). 
The State's revision expands the types of testing and monitoring data, 
including stack

[[Page 17137]]

and process monitoring, which can be used directly for compliance 
certifications and enforcement.

DATES: Comments on this proposed action must be received by May 9, 
1997.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: Carlton T. Nash, Chief, 
Regulation Development Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), Region 5, 
77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604-3590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brad Beeson at (312) 353-4779.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For additional information, see the Direct 
Final notice which is located in the Rules section of this Federal 
Register. Copies of the request and the EPA's analysis are available 
for inspection at the following address: (Please telephone Brad Beeson 
at (312) 353-4779 before visiting the Region 5 office.) EPA, Region 5, 
Air and Radiation Division, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 
Illinois 60604-3590.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q.

    Dated: February 7, 1997.
Michelle D. Jordan,
Acting Regional Administrator.
[FR Doc. 97-8970 Filed 4-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                              RUDDICK CORPORATION

             STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

<Table>
<Caption>
                                                                    FISCAL YEAR ENDED
                                                              ------------------------------
                                                              SEPTEMBER 30,      OCTOBER 1,
                                                                  2001              2000
                                                              -------------      -----------
<S>                                                           <C>                <C>
NET INCOME PER SHARE COMPUTED AS FOLLOWS:
BASIC:
1. Net Income available to common shareholders..............   $  (727,498)      $51,002,439
                                                               ===========       ===========
2. Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding -- Basic......    46,276,278        46,274,479
3. Basic net income per share (Item 1 divided by Item 2)....   $     (0.02)      $      1.10
                                                               ===========       ===========
DILUTED:
1. Net Income available to common shareholders..............   $  (727,498)      $51,002,439
                                                               ===========       ===========
2. Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding -- Basic......    46,276,278        46,274,479
3. Weighted potential shares under stock options computed
   for the periods using the Treasury Stock Method..........            --(1)         75,215
                                                               -----------       -----------
4. Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding -- Diluted
   Common Equivalent Shares Outstanding.....................    46,276,278        46,349,694
                                                               ===========       ===========
5. Net Income Per Share (Item 1 divided by Item 4)..........   $     (0.02)      $      1.10
                                                               ===========       ===========
</Table>

---------------

(1) The effect of 111,535 weighted potential shares under stock options computed
    for 2001 using the Treasury Stock Method is anti-dilutive and thus is
    disregarded in the determination of weighted average diluted common
    equivalent shares outstanding.
III 

Calendar No. 421 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 339 

To express the sense of the Senate in support of permitting the televising 

of Supreme Court proceedings. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 5, 2009 

Mr. SPECTER (for himself, Mr. KAUFMAN, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. FEINGOLD, Mr. 

DURBIN, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, Mr. SCHUMER, Mrs. 

GILLIBRAND, and Mr. LEAHY) submitted the following resolution; which 

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JUNE 8, 2010 

Reported by Mr. LEAHY, without amendment 

RESOLUTION 

To express the sense of the Senate in support of permitting 

the televising of Supreme Court proceedings. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. SENSE OF THE SENATE. 

3 It is the sense of the Senate that the Supreme Court 

4 should permit live television coverage of all open sessions 

5 of the Court unless the Court decides, by a vote of the 

6 majority of justices, that allowing such coverage in a parVerDate Mar 15 2010 21:47 Jun 08, 2010 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\SR339.RS SR339

hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 339 RS 

1 ticular case would constitute a violation of the due process 

2 rights of 1 or more of the parties before the Court. 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS

hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 421 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 339 

RESOLUTION 

To express the sense of the Senate in support of 

ceedings. permitting the televising of Supreme Court proJUNE 8, 2010 

Reported without amendment 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 3, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-60177

Summary Calendar

RIAZ MOMIN,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

--------------------

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A95 455 372

--------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Riaz Momin, a citizen of India, petitions this court for

review of an order of the denial of his applications for asylum,

withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against

Torture (“CAT”). The Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”)

summarily affirmed the denial of relief by the Immigration Judge

(“IJ”).

Momin contends that the BIA and IJ erred by determining that

he had not shown a well-founded fear of persecution or that it

was more likely than not that he would be subjected to torture if
No. 05-60177

-2-

he returned to India. However, because the record does not

compel a finding that Momin was entitled to any of the relief he

sought, Momin has failed to show that the decision was not

supported by substantial evidence. See INS v. Elias-Zacarias,

502 U.S. 478, 483-84 (1992); Faddoul v. INS, 37 F.3d 185, 188

(5th Cir. 1994).; Efe v. Ashcroft, 293 F.3d 899, 906-07 (5th Cir.

2002). 

Momin’s petition for review therefore is DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 68 (Wednesday, April 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 17185]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-9028]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-306-000]


Williams Natural Gas Co.; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas 
Tariff

April 3, 1997.
    Take notice that on March 31, 1997, Williams Natural Gas Company 
(WNG) tendered for filing to become part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second 
Revised Volume No. 1, Second Revised Sheet Nos. 253 and 254 and First 
Revised Sheet No. 255. The proposed effective date of these tariff 
sheets is May 1, 1997.
    WNG states that the purpose for the instant filing is to amend 
Article 14 of the General Terms and Conditions of WNG's FERC Gas Tariff 
to modify WNG's pricing differential mechanism (PDM) calculation.
    WNG states that a copy of its filing was served on all 
jurisdictional customers and interested state commissions.
    Any persons desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NW., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as provided 
in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any persons wishing to become a party must file a motion 
to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-9028 Filed 4-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 12-5674.

#### Battle *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 69 (Thursday, April 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17630-17631]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-9211]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[OR-118-6332-00; GP7-0136]


Closure of All Segments of the London Peak Overlook Trail to Off-
Highway and Mechanized Vehicle Use

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Medford District Office.

ACTION: Emergency closure of public land trail in Josephine County, 
Oregon.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that effective immediately, all 
segments of the London Peak Overlook Trail under Bureau of Land 
Management control are closed to all uses other than foot traffic or 
wheelchairs. The closure is made under the authority of 43 CFR 8341.2. 
The closure will remain in effect until such time that changes in 
resource management warrant modifications.
    The public lands affected by this emergency closure are 
specifically identified as follows:

    London Peak Overlook Trail on BLM lands in T.33 S., R. 6 W., 
Section 21, Willamette

[[Page 17631]]

Meridian, Josephine County, Oregon as shown on a map available at 
the Medford District, Bureau of Land Management Office.

    The following persons, operating within the scope of their official 
duties, are exempt from the provisions of this closure order: Bureau 
employees, state, local and federal law enforcement and fire protection 
personnel; and the holders of BLM permits and/or contracts. Vehicle 
access by additional parties may be allowed, but must be approved by 
the Authorized Officer of the BLM.
    The purpose of this closure is to protect the trail surfacing for 
wheelchair use and limit safety hazards of incompatible uses.
    Any person who fails to comply with a closure order or rulemaking 
is subject to arrest and fines of up to $1,000 and/or imprisonment not 
to exceed 12 months.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Diane Chung, Area Manager, Bureau of 
Land Management, Glendale Resource Area, Medford District Office, 3040 
Biddle Rd, Medford, OR 97504 or (541) 770-2279.

    Dated: March 31, 1997.
Diane Chung,
Glendale Area Manager.
[FR Doc. 97-9211 Filed 4-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-33-M
#### State v. Goheen

103,895

08/19/13

Denied.

Unpublished
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-10392 Conference Calendar

BRYAN MCMILLEN; JAMES MCMILLEN; LINDA MCMILLEN, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus DENNIS CLAY; DENNIS MEYERS; TINA JACKSON, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:97-CV-14-A

- - - - - - - - - - December 9, 1997 Before BARKSDALE, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Bryan McMillen and his parents, James and Linda McMillen, appeal the dismissal of their civil rights suit which alleged that seventeen-year old Bryan was illegally arrested for a murder and subjected to excessive force, unconstitutional jail conditions, unfair investigative conduct, inadequate medical treatment, false and malicious prosecution, and false imprisonment. We have reviewed the record and the parties’No. 97-10392 -2- briefs and AFFIRM for the reasons set forth by the district
court. McMillen v. Clay , No. 4:97-CV-14-A (N.D. Tex., Mar. 11, 1997).
AFFIRMED.
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 398 

To authorize representation by the Senate Legal Counsel in the case of 

Schonberg, et al. v. Sanders, et al. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 26, 2010 

Mr. REID submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed 

to 

RESOLUTION 

To authorize representation by the Senate Legal Counsel 

in the case of Schonberg, et al. v. Sanders, et al. 

Whereas, in the case of Schonberg, et al. v. Sanders, et al., 

Case No. 5:09–CV–534, pending in the United States 

District Court for the Middle District of Florida, plaintiffs have named as defendants five Senators; and 

Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(1) of the 

Ethics in Government Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. 288b(a) and 

§§ 288c(a)(1), the Senate may direct its counsel to defend Members of the Senate in civil actions relating to 

their official responsibilities: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate Legal Counsel is author2 ized to represent Senators Lieberman, Lincoln, McConVerDate Nov 24 2008 02:07 Jan 27, 2010 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\SR398.ATS SR398

dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 398 ATS 

1 nell, McCain, and Sanders in the case of Schonberg, et al. 

2 v. Sanders, et al. 

Æ 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
#### Garetson Brothers v. American Warrior, Inc.

111,975

01/25/2016

Denied.

51 Kan. App. 2d 370
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 53 (Wednesday, March 19, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 13170]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6917]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application

    Pursuant to Sec. 1301.43(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on November 22, 1996, Knoll 
Pharmaceuticals, 30 North Jefferson Road, Whippany, New Jersey 07981, 
made application by renewal, which was received for processing February 
4, 1997, to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) for registration 
as a bulk manufacturer of hydromorphone (9150), a basic class of 
controlled substance in Schedule II.
    The firm plans to produce hydromorphone bulk product and finished 
dosage units of dilaudid for distribution to its customers.
    Any other such applicant and any person who is presently registered 
with DEA to manufacture such substance may file comments or objections 
to the issuance of the above application.
    Any such comments or objections may be addressed, in quintuplicate, 
to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, 
Drug Enforcement Administration, United States Department of Justice, 
Washington, D.C. 20537, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative 
(CCR), and must be filed no later than May 19, 1997.

    Dated February 26, 1997.
Gene R. Haislip,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 97-6917 Filed 3-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
Exhibit 10.30



FIRST AMENDMENT

TO

DEFERRED COMPENSATION AGREEMENT



THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this 13th day of March, 1980, by and
between ROWE FURNITURE CORPORATION, a Virginia corporation (hereinafter referred to as the Company ), and BARRY A. BIRNBACH (hereinafter referred to as the Employee).



WITNESSETH:



WHEREAS, the Company and the Employee did enter into a Deferred Compensation
Agreement on the 31st day of August, 1978; and



WHEREAS, the
parties to such Agreement desire to amend its terms in accordance with the resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company at its Board Meeting held on the 13th day of March, 1980;



NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the forgoing and the mutual promises of
the parties thereto, it is agreed as follows:



1. Paragraph 8
of the above referred to Deferred Compensation Agreement is hereby amended in full, as follows:



| | 8. | Termination of Employment by Employee Prior to Normal Retirement Date
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------



In the event that Employee voluntarily terminates his employment with the Company for reasons other than attaining age sixty-two (62), death, or
disability (as hereinafter defined), no payment shall be due to said Employee and/or his beneficiaries under any provision of this





---

Agreement; provided, however, that if such Employee, at the time of such voluntary termination, has completed at least
fifteen (15) years of service with the Company and his age plus years of service with the Company is equal to or greater than the sum of sixty (60), then in that event, Employee shall be entitled to the same benefits as a discharged employee, as set
forth in Paragraph 10(a) hereinbelow.



2. All other terms and
provisions of the above referred to Deferred Compensation Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Employee have executed this First Amendment to Deferred Compensation Agreement under seal, each intending to be
legally bound hereby.



|                 |  |  |  |                                                   |  |                             
|---------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------
|                 |  |  |  | ROWE FURNITURE CORPORATION a Virginia corporation
|(corporate seal) |  |  |  |                                                  
|                 |  |  |  | By                                                |  | /s/ Gerald M. Birnbach      
|                 |  |  |  |                                                   |  | Gerald M. Birnbach President



ATTEST:



|                        
|------------------------
|                        
|/s/ Joseph Skarbek      
|Joseph Skarbek Secretary



| |  |                      
| |  | ---------------------
| |  | /s/ BARRY A. BIRNBACH
| |  | BARRY A. BIRNBACH