alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
Capital Solutions 1, Inc. pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of
2002

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Capital Solutions 1,
Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended August 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned Christopher Astrom, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of Bentley Communications Corp., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: October 15, 2005

                                      /s/ CHRISTOPHER ASTROM
                                      ------------------------
                                      Christopher Astrom
                                      Chief Executive Officer

                                      /s/ CHRISTOPHER ASTROM
                                      ------------------------
                                      Christopher Astrom
                                      Chief Financial Officer
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**1027 KA 13-01496**  PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, VALENTINO, WHALEN, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

RICHARD J. TRATHEN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

PAUL B. WATKINS, FAIRPORT, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

DONALD G. O’GEEN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, WARSAW (VINCENT A. HEMMING OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Wyoming County Court (Mark H. Dadd, J.), rendered July 11, 2013. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of driving while intoxicated, a class E felony.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of driving while intoxicated (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 [3]), defendant contends that his plea was not knowing, voluntary and intelligent because County Court failed specifically to advise him that, upon his guilty plea, his driver’s license would be revoked for a period of one year. Although defendant’s contention survives his waiver of the right to appeal ( see People v Robinson , 112 AD3d 1349, 1349, lv denied ___ NY3d ___ [July 21, 2014]; People v Rossborough
, 101 AD3d 1775, 1776), it is not preserved for our review because defendant did not move to withdraw his plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction ( see Rossborough
, 101 AD3d at 1776; People v Newman [appeal No. 1], 231 AD2d 875, 875, lv denied 89 NY2d 944). In any event, defendant’s contention is without merit. Although a court must explain the direct consequences of a guilty plea, the court “has no obligation to explain to defendants who plead guilty the possibility that collateral consequences may attach to their criminal convictions” ( People v Catu , 4 NY3d 242, 244; see generally People v Jones , 118 AD3d 1360, 1361). The Court of Appeals has expressly stated that the “loss of a driver’s license” is a collateral consequence of a conviction ( People v Ford , 86 NY2d 397, 403), and we have accordingly held that a “court’s failure to disclose that consequence during the plea colloquy does not warrant vacatur of the plea” ( People v Gerald
, 103 AD3d 1249, 1250). Here, the record establishes that defendant was in fact informed that, as a consequence of his guilty plea, his license would be revoked. Inasmuch as the court was not “obligat[ed] to explain . . . [even] that collateral consequence[]” ( Catu , 4 NY3d**-2- 1027 KA 13-01496** 
at 244), we reject defendant’s contention that the court was obligated to advise him that the revocation period would be exactly one year. We have reviewed defendant’s remaining contentions and conclude that they are without merit.

Entered: October 3, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

December 31, 2005

 

To the Addresses listedon Schedule I hereto.

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

ThisAnnual Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10(a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 9, 2005 (the“Agreement”) and pursuant to Section 3.9 of the Indenture Agreement datedas of November 9, 2005 (the “Indenture), executed in connection with theformation of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2005-D-A (the “Trust”),the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of the transactions andthe execution and delivery of the various documents by AmeriCredit Corp.,AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the “Servicer”) and AFS SenSub Corp.in connection therewith.  The capitalizedterms used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.

 

Theundersigned certifies that I am the Executive Vice President, Chief FinancialOfficer and Treasurer of the Servicer.  Ifurther certify as follows:

 

1.               Ihave conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of theServicer during the preceding period from November 9, 2005 through December 31,2005, and its performance under the Agreement.

 

2.  To the best of my knowledge, following suchreview, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreementthroughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been nodefault in the fulfillment of any such obligation.

 

 

AmeriCredit FinancialServices, Inc.

 

 
| By:    | /s/ Chris A.  Choate                   |   | Dated:  February 28,  2006 |
|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------|
|   | Chris A. Choate                        |   |
|   | Executive Vice  President,             |   |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer and Treasurer |   |

 

----

 

Schedule I

 

Trustee, Trust CollateralAgent

andBackup Servicer:

 

JPMorganChase Bank

GlobalDebt/Asset Backed Securities

4 NewYork Plaza, 6th Floor

NewYork, NY  10004

Attention:Aranka Paul

 

Owner Trustee:

 

WilmingtonTrust Company

Rodney Square North

1100 North Market Street

Wilmington,DE  19890-0001

Attention:Steve Barone

 

Insurer:

 

AMBACAssurance Corporation

OneState Street Plaza

NewYork, NY  10004

Attention:Khushbu Thakkar

 

Rating Agencies:

 

Moody’sInvestors Service, Inc.

99Church Street

NewYork, NY 10007

Attention:ABS Monitoring Department

 

Standard &Poor’s Rating Services

55Water Street

40thFloor

NewYork, NY 10041

Attention:Asset Backed Surveillance Department

 

Fitch, Inc.

OneState Street Plaza, 32nd Floor

NewYork, New York 10014

Attention:  Auto Surveillance Department

 

----
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 Exhibit 23.1


                         Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8's) pertaining to the 1984 Stock Option Plan (No. 2-98841, Post
Effective Amendment No. 1, dated November 23, 1988), Stock Option Plan for
Non-Employee Directors (No. 33-43625, dated November 1, 1991), 1994 Directors'
Stock Compensation Plan (No. 33-84032, dated September 13, 1994), Robbins &
Myers, Inc. Employee Savings Plan (No. 33-61893, dated August 17, 1995), Robbins
& Myers, Inc. 1994 Long-term Incentive Plan (No. 333-00291, dated January 19,
1996), Robbins & Myers, Inc. 1995 Stock Option Plan for Non-employee Directors
(No. 333-00293, dated January 19, 1996), Robbins & Myers, Inc. Savings Plan for
Union Employees (No. 333-00289 dated February 7, 1996), Robbins & Myers, Inc.
1999 Long-term Incentive Plan (No. 333-35856 dated April 28, 2000) and the
Registration Statement (Form S-3) pertaining to Investor Stock Purchase Plan
(No. 333-31235, dated July 14, 1997) of our report dated October 2, 2000, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Robbins &
Myers, Inc. and Subsidiaries, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the
year ended August 31, 2000.



                                  /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Dayton, Ohio
November 17, 2000
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-50951 Summary Calendar

PHILE A. WATSON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

LOUIS CALDERA,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

(W-99-CV-312)

April 23, 2001

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Phile A. Watson’s Privacy Act complaint having been dismissed

for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted,

Watson asserts the district court erred in granting summary

judgment. In support, Watson contends there are material fact

issues: the five alleged factual errors in his Army military

records that he seeks to correct.

Needless to say, when matter s outside the pleadings are

presented to, and not excluded by, the court in support of a motion

to dismiss for failure to state a claim, the motion “shall be2

treated as one for summary judgment”. F E D

. R. C IV

. P. 12 (b)(6).

The grant of such a motion is reviewed as would be any other

summary judgment, i.e.

, de novo, applying the same legal standards

as did the district court. E .g., Songbyrd, Inc. v. Bearsville

Records, Inc. , 104 F.3d 773, 776 (5th Cir. 1997).

The Privacy Act permits a person to contest the accuracy of

administrative records; it does not authorize relitigation of the

substance of agency decisions. S ee 5 U.S.C. § 552a( g)(1)(C);

Castella v. Long

, 701 F. Supp. 578, 584-85 (N.D. Tex.), aff’d

, 862

F.2d 872 (5th Cir. 1988) (Table), cert. denied

, 493 U.S. 936

(1989); Reinbold v. Evers

, 187 F.3d 348, 360 (4th Cir. 1999);

Douglas v. Agric. Stabilization & Conservation Serv.

, 33 F.3d 784,

785 (7th Cir. 1994). Each of the alleged factual errors are,

instead, attempts to relitigate the Army’s decision to issue a

general discharge. Again, such an attempt is n ot cognizable under

the Privacy Act.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Micronetics, Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ended  June  30,
2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date  hereof (the "Report"), David Robbins, President  and  Chief
Executive Officer of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act  of
1934; and

           (2)   The  information contained in the Report  fairly
presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition  and
result of operations of the Company.




August 16, 2004             /s/David Robbins
                            ------------------------------------
                            Name:  David Robbins
                            Title: Chief Executive Officer
                                   (Principal Executive Officer)



      This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to
Section  906  of  the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and  shall  not,
except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of  2002,
be  deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 99.1



                     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                      18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
           SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



      In  connection with the Quarterly Report of Micronetics, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003,
as  filed  with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the  date
hereof (the "Report"), Richard S. Kalin, Chief Executive Officer of
the  Company  certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of  2002,
that, to the best of his knowledge:

           (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements  of
Section  13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act  of
1934; and

           (2)   The  information contained in  the  Report  fairly
presents,  in  all material respects, the financial  condition  and
result of operations of the Company.




July 28, 2003                 /s/Richard S. Kalin
                              -----------------------------------
                              Name:  Richard S. Kalin
                              Title: Chief Executive Officer
                                     (Principal Executive Officer)



      This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section
906  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the
extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed  filed
by  the  Company  for  purposes of Section  18  of  the  Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
<PAGE>   1



                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8's) pertaining to the 1979 Stock Option Plan (No. 2-66181,
Post-Effective Amendment No. 3, dated December 1, 1982), the 1984 Stock Option
Plan (No. 2-98841, Post-Effective Amendment No. 1, dated November 23, 1988), the
Employee Savings Plan (No. 33-32103, dated December 7, 1989 and No. 33-49466,
dated July 9, 1992), Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors (No. 33-
43625, dated November 1, 1991), 1994 Directors' Stock Compensation Plan (No.
33-84032, dated September 13, 1994), the Robbins & Myers, Inc. Savings Plan
for Salaried Employees of Chemineer, Edlon, and Pfaudler (No. 33-61893, dated
August 17, 1995), the Robbins & Myers, Inc. Savings Plan for Union Employees
(No. 333-00289, dated January 19, 1996), the Robbins & Myers, Inc. 1994
Long-term Incentive Stock Plan (No. 333-00291, Dated January 19, 1996) and the
Robbins & Myers, Inc. 1995 Stock Option Plan for Non-employee Directors (No.
333-00293, dated January 19, 1996) of our report dated October 1, 1996, with 
respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Robbins & 
Myers, Inc. and Subsidiaries, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for 
the year ended August 31, 1996.


                                          /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

November 22, 1996                         Ernst & Young LLP
##### 



Exhibit 24.1

ROBBINS & MYERS, INC.

LIMITED POWER OF ATTORNEY

WHEREAS, Robbins &
Myers, Inc. (the "Company") intends to file with the Securities and
Exchange Commission its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2001:

NOW, THEREFORE, each of the undersigned in his capacity as a director of the Company hereby appoints Gerald L.
Connelly his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, to execute in his name,
place and stead, the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2001, (including any amendment to such
report) and any and all other instruments necessary or incidental in connection therewith, and to file the same with the Securities
and Exchange Commission. Said attorney shall have full power and authority to do and perform in the name and on behalf of the
undersigned, in the aforesaid capacity, every act whatsoever necessary or desirable to be done, as fully to all intents and purposes
as the undersigned might or could do in person. The undersigned hereby ratifies and approves the act of said attorney.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this instrument this 20th day of November, 2001.

|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|/s/ Maynard H. Murch, IVMaynard H. Murch, IV
|                                            
|/s/ Robert J. KegerreisRobert J. Kegerreis  
|                                            
|/s/ Thomas P. LoftisThomas P. Loftis        
|                                            
|/s/ William D. ManningWilliam D. Manning    
|                                            
|/s/ Jerome F. TatarJerome F. Tatar          
|                                            
|/s/John N. Taylor, Jr.John N. Taylor, Jr.
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 74 (Monday, April 18, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 21789]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9266]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

ITS Joint Program Office; Vehicle to Infrastructure Core System 
Concept of Operations; Notice of Public Meeting

AGENCY: Research and Innovative Technology Administration, U.S. 
Department of Transportation.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The U.S. Department of Transportation ITS Joint Program Office (ITS 
JPO) will host a free public meeting to discuss the Vehicle to 
Infrastructure (V2I) Core System Concept of Operations on May 17, 2011 
at the Detroit Metro Airport Marriott, 30559 Flynn Drive, Romulus, 
Michigan 48174 (734.729.7555). The conference is for interested parties 
to learn about the Core System ConOps, including the system boundaries, 
high-level functions, modes of operation, system needs, and operational 
scenarios. Feedback obtained during the meeting will be considered for 
the ongoing project. To learn more about the ITS JPO, visit the 
program's Web site at http://www.its.dot.gov.
    The V2I Core System will support applications for safety, mobility, 
and sustainability for various modes of transportation including 
passenger vehicles, transit, and heavy trucks. This is the successor to 
work originally performed under the Vehicle Infrastructure Integration 
Proof of Concept (VII POC). The Core System supports a distributed, 
diverse set of applications.
    Interested parties planning to attend the public meeting should 
send their full name, organization and business e-mail address to Adam 
Hoops at ITS America at Ahoops@ITSA.org by May 13, 2011. For additional 
questions, please contact Adam Hoops at 202.680.0091.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on the 12th day of April 2011.
John Augustine,
Managing Director, ITS Joint Program Office.
[FR Doc. 2011-9266 Filed 4-15-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-HY-P
```
Exhibit 99.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Multi-Color Corporation, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the periodending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Francis D. Gerace, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

| 1)     |   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                 |
| 2)     |   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|                              |   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
|------------------------------|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: February 14, 2003 |   |   | By: /s/ FRANCIS D. GERACE                                             |
|                         |   |   | **Francis D. Gerace****President and Chief Executive Officer**                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |

** **
#### Sharp v. Kansas Dept. for Children & Families

110,458

04/21/2016

Denied.

Unpublished
# table2
Bar Docket No. 8804

#### In the Matter of Christopher W. O’Brien, *Respondent.*

(361 P.3d 515)

Dated this 24th day of November, 2015.

In a letter signed November 10, 2015, addressed to the Clerk of the Appellate Courts, respondent Christopher W. O’Brien, an attorney admitted to practice law in Kansas, voluntarily surrendered his license to practice law in Kansas, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 217 (2015 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 390).

At the time the respondent surrendered his license, a complaint had been docketed by the office of the Disciplinary Administrator for investigation. The complaint alleged that the respondent violated Kansas Rules of Professional Conduct 1.15 (2015 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 556) (safekeeping property) and 8.4(b) and (c) (2015 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 672) (misconduct). The allegations involved conversion of client funds.

This court, having examined tire files of the office of the Disciplinary Administrator, finds that the surrender of the respondent’s license should be accepted and that the respondent should be disbarred.

It Is Therefore Ordered that Christopher W. O’Brien be and he is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in Kansas, and his license and privilege to practice law are hereby revoked.

It Is Further Ordered that the Clerk of the Appellate Courts strike the name of Christopher W. O’Brien from the roll of attorneys licensed to practice law in Kansas.

It Is Further Ordered that this order shall be published in the Kansas Reports, that the costs herein shall be assessed to the respondent, and that the respondent forthwith shall comply with Supreme Court Rule 218 (2015 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 401).