alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
RECORD OF EX PARTE CONTACT

AD DOCKET NUMBER: 2010-NM-156-All

FAA EMPLOYEE CONTACTED: Patrick Farina, ANM-150S

DATE AND TIME OF CONTACT: September 29, 2010 between 0730 and 0830

TYPE OF CONTACT: Informal, before attending a seminar.

NAMES OF ALL PERSONS INVOLVED IN CONTACT, INCLUDrNG TITLES AND AFFILIATION:

Brian Wood, Senior Engineer at Continental Airlines (COA), lnteriors Engineering

Robert Ayvazian, Director Engineering & Quality at Flight Line Products InclKoito Aviation. LLC.

TOPIC(S) DISCUSSED (Bc specific):

The two parties provided the following information and asked questions:

Currently modifying an aircraft to remove mid fuselage galley and or lavatory.

Intend to install different model Koite seats.

Can they be installed after the AD?

Parts such as cushions have been manufactured and sent to the customer can they install them?

The FAA responded as follows:

COA docs not have a current approved Layout of Passenger Accommodation for the proposed configuration.

Question is answered under the Parts Installation of the NPRM.

Seating system may be re-installed on the airplane from which it was originally removed, provided it is removed

from service within the applicable compliance time specified in the AD.

COA installation would be a new configuration. An STC type application for installation would require control

of the seating system design, conformity of the altic1c and compliance to the airworthiness requirements for

installation such as 25.561, 25.562, 25.853.

Parts and spares can be installed as the AD has not been issued. Once the AD is issued these parts may be

subject to the AD.

COMMITMENTS MADE BY FAA/DOT PERSONNEL:

No conclusion was made from this discussion and both parties were requested to read the AD and submit

comments directly to the NPRM web site.

Were any documents discussed? ( ) YES (attach copies or reference) (X) No

THIS FORM IS TO BE PLACED IN THE PUBLIC DOCKET

FOR THE SUBJECT RULEMAKJNG ACTION.

R",~sion 1 16-2009
<PAGE>
 

                                                                    Exhibit 23


                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                   -----------------------------------------


To the Board of Directors and
Management of Safety-Kleen Corp.:




As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
reports included in or incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K, into the
Company's previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File No. 2-
97490, File No. 2-67421, File No. 33-34892, File No. 33-51396, File No. 2-97196,
File No. 33-56371) and on Form S-3 (File No. 22-806, File No. 33-18043, File No.
33-15010, File No. 33-27174, File No. 33-30519, File No. 33-35008 and File No.
33-44715).


                                          /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP

Chicago, Illinois
March 27, 1996
**Exhibit 10.32**

**Summary ofNon-Employee Director Compensation**

     Ruddick Corporation (the “Company”) compensates each member of itsBoard of Directors (the “Board) who is not an employee of the Company or itssubsidiaries. Effective January 1, 2009, non-employee directors will receive$34,000 per year for services as a director, plus $2,000 for each Board meetingor committee meeting attended. In addition to the general fees for directorsdescribed above, the Chairman of the Audit Committee of the Board is paid anadditional annual fee of $6,000 for services as chairman of thatcommittee.

     Non-employee directors of the Company maydefer the payment of the annual fee and/or Board meeting fees, pursuant to theCompany’s Director Deferral Plan (the “Deferral Plan”). The deferred fees areconverted into units representing shares of Common Stock of the Company (the“Common Stock”) with a fair market value equal to the value of the feesdeferred, and the number of units is then credited to the director’s account,along with additional units representing the amount of any dividends or stockdistributions. Upon termination of service as a director or in the event ofdeath, the balance of the director’s account will be distributed to the directoror a designated beneficiary in the form of Common Stock.

     Under the Company’s 1995 ComprehensiveStock Option Plan (the “1995 Plan”), the Company automatically granted eachnon-employee director at the time the 1995 Plan was adopted a ten-year option topurchase 10,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price equal to the fairmarket value of the Common Stock on the date of the option grant. Since thattime, pursuant to the provisions of the Company’s stock option plans, theCompany has automatically granted a ten-year option to purchase 10,000 shares ofCommon Stock to each new non-employee director upon his or her initial electionas director. These options are immediately vested, and the exercise price ofthese options is equal to the fair market value of the Common Stock on the dateof the director’s election.

     The Company grants additional equityawards to its non-employee directors from time to time, at the Board’sdiscretion. These equity awards generally have taken the form of stock optiongrants and discretionary contributions by the Company to the Deferral Plan forthe benefit of each non-employee director, however, other award types may begranted in the future at the discretion of the Board. On November 20, 2008, theBoard approved discretionary contributions by the Company to the Deferral Planfor the benefit of each non-employee director in the amount of$14,000.

     The Company also provides term lifeinsurance coverage for each non-employee director.

----
No. 11-1522.

#### Williams *v.*United States.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 99.1


                                 UNITED STATES
                      SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                            WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549



                                   FORM 11-K


[X]     ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
        OF 1934 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999 or

[ ]     TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
        ACT OF 1934 for the transition period from ______ to ______


                       Commission File Number   0-1743
                                              ----------

A.      Full title of the plan and address of the plan:

        The Rouse Company Savings Plan
        c/o Human Resources Division
        The Rouse Company Building
        10275 Little Patuxent Parkway
        Columbia, Maryland 21044

B.      Name of issuer of the securities held pursuant to the plan and the
        address of its principal executive offices:

        The Rouse Company
        The Rouse Company Building
        10275 Little Patuxent Parkway
        Columbia, Maryland 21044
<PAGE>

                             REQUIRED INFORMATION

Since The Rouse Company Savings Plan (the "Plan") is subject to the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, the Plan financial statements for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 1999 will be filed on or before June 29, 2000.



                                  SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
trustees (or other persons who administer the Plan) have duly caused this annual
report to be signed by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.



          THE ROUSE COMPANY SAVINGS PLAN
          ------------------------------


Date: March  30, 2000                         By ______________________________
      ---------------                            Janice A. Fuchs, Administrator


                                              and


Date: March  30, 2000                         By ______________________________
      ---------------                            Jeffrey H. Donahue, Trustee
#### State v. Die

110,392

07/22/2015

Denied

Unpublished
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 10 (Wednesday, January 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2212-2213]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-917]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration


Environmental Impact Statement; Sequoyah and LeFlore Counties, OK

agency: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.

action: Notice of intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

summary: The FHWA is issuing this notice to advise the public that an 
environmental impact statement will be

[[Page 2213]]

prepared for a proposed highway project in Sequoyah and LeFlore 
Counties, Oklahoma.

for further information contact: Mr. Jim Erickson, Division 
Administrator, Federal Highway Administration, 715 South Metropolitan 
Avenue, Suite 700, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73108, Telephone: (405) 945-
6173.

supplementary information: The FHWA, in cooperation with the Oklahoma 
Department of Transportation, will prepare an environmental impact 
statement (EIS) on a proposal to improve US Route 59 (US59) from a two-
lane to a four-lane facility from its intersection with State Highway 9 
(SH 9), also known as Sunset Corner, north to Interstate 40 (I-40).
    This facility has been identified as a Transportation Improvement 
Corridor (TIC) in the Statewide Intermodal Transportation Plan and 
improvements to the corridor are considered necessary to meet TIC 
policy as well as present and future traffic demands. Alternatives 
under consideration include (1) improve the existing alignment, (2) 
improve the existing alignment with a new roadway alignment over Wild 
Horse Mountain, and (3) a new alignment corridor from Sunset Corner 
north to I-40 just east of Sallisaw.
    Letters describing the proposed action and soliciting comments have 
been sent to appropriate Federal, State and local agencies, and to 
private organizations and citizens who have previously expressed or are 
known to have interest in this proposal. Public meetings and/or public 
hearings will be held in the vicinity of the proposal in the future. 
Public notice will be given of the time and place of the meetings and/
or hearings.
    To ensure that the full range of issues related to this proposed 
action are addressed and all significant issues identified, comments 
and suggestions are invited from all interested parties. Comments or 
questions concerning this proposed action and the EIS should be 
directed to the FHWA at the address provided above.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 20.205, 
Highway Research, Planning and Construction. The regulations 
implementing Executive Order 12372 regarding intergovernmental 
consultation on Federal programs and activities apply to this 
program).

    Issued on: January 6, 1997.
Jim Erickson,
FHWA, Division Administrator, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
[FR Doc. 97-917 Filed 1-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-M
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 390 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 390

Prohibiting text messaging by employees of the Senate while driving on 
                           official business.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 21, 2010

Mr. Casey (for himself, Mr. Schumer, and Mr. Rockefeller) submitted the 
following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules and 
                             Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Prohibiting text messaging by employees of the Senate while driving on 
                           official business.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON TEXT MESSAGING BY EMPLOYEES OF THE SENATE 
              WHILE DRIVING ON OFFICIAL BUSINESS.

    (a) Definitions.--In this resolution--
            (1) the term ``employee of the Senate'' means any employee 
        whose pay is disbursed by the Secretary of the Senate; and
            (2) the term ``text messaging'' means reading from or 
        entering data into any handheld or other electronic device, 
        including for the purpose of SMS texting, e-mailing, instant 
        messaging, obtaining navigational information, or engaging in 
        any other form of electronic data retrieval or electronic data 
        communication.
    (b) Prohibition.--An employee of the Senate may not engage in text 
messaging when--
            (1) driving a Government owned or leased vehicle;
            (2) driving a privately owned or leased vehicle while on 
        official business; or
            (3) using text messaging equipment provided by any office 
        or committee of the Senate while driving any vehicle at any 
        time.
    (c) Effective Date and Application.--This resolution shall apply to 
the 111th Congress and each Congress thereafter.
                                 <all>
```
October 5, 2012

No. 11-796.

#### Bowman *v.*Monsanto Co. et al.

C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari granted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       2,015,995
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  724,515
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,819,925
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,072,931
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          910,229
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             8
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,162,694
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,072,931
<SALES>                                      1,946,771
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,146,345
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                75,739
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,070,606
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,065,106
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,065,106
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.03
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 54 (Thursday, March 20, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 13356]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-7068]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 51

[AD-FRL-5711-6]


Proposed Implementation Requirements for Reduction of Sulfur 
Oxide (Sulfur Dioxide) Emissions

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Reopening of public comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The EPA is announcing the reopening of the public comment 
period on the proposed implementation requirements to address short-
term peak concentrations of sulfur dioxide (SO<INF>2)--also known as 
the Intervention Level Program--that were published on January 2, 1997 
(62 FR 210).

DATES: Written comments on this proposal must be received on or before 
April 11, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Submit written comments on this proposal (two copies are 
preferred) to: Office of Air and Radiation Docket and Information 
Center (Air Docket 6102), Room M 1500, U.S. Environmental Protection 
Agency, Attention: Docket No. A-94-55, 401 M Street, S.W., Washington, 
DC 20460. The docket may be inspected between 8:00 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. 
on weekdays, and a reasonable fee may be charged for copying. The Air 
Docket may be called at (202) 260-7548.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric L. Crump, Integrated Policies and 
Strategies Group (MD-15), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, telephone (919) 541-4719.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: To allow sufficient time to review the 
proposed implementation requirements for reducing short-term 
concentrations of SO<INF>2 (40 CFR part 51) before submitting comments, 
the EPA is reopening the public comment period on this proposal from 
March 3, 1997 to April 11, 1997.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 51

    Environmental protection, Administrative practices and procedure, 
Air pollution control, Intergovernmental relations, SO<INF>2, Reporting 
and recordkeeping requirements, State implementation plans.

    Dated: March 13, 1997.
Richard Wilson,
Acting Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 97-7068 Filed 3-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
|                                                                                               
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                 
|View History:                                                                                  
|                                                                                               
|Percent of Industrial Natural Gas Deliveries in Connecticut Represented by the Price  (Percent)
|                                                                                               
|                                                                                               
|Percent of Industrial Natural Gas Deliveries in Connecticut Represented by the Price  (Percent)
|                                                                                               

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 66.4   | 55.8   | 55.8  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 47.3   | 54.0   | 48.9   | 45.3   | 44.0   | 46.4   | 48.5   | 50.0   | 47.3   | 37.5  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 31.1   | 31.0   | 32.3   | 33.4   | 39.4   | 47.3   | 49.0   | 50.4   | 51.8   | 51.2  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 47.6   | 48.5   | 50.0   | 59.9   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
|                               |  |           
|------------------------------ |  | ----------
|Subsidiaries of the Registrant |  | Exhibit 21



The listing below includes the
significant subsidiaries of the Corporation. All subsidiaries are wholly owned by Safeco Corporation.



|1. | Safeco Insurance Company of America (WA)
|-- | ----------------------------------------



|2. | General Insurance Company of America (WA)
|-- | -----------------------------------------



|3. | Safeco Life Insurance Company (WA)
|-- | ----------------------------------



|4. | American States Insurance Company (IN)
|-- | --------------------------------------



|5. | American Economy Insurance Company (IN)
|-- | ---------------------------------------
EXHIBIT 31.1 - SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

                             CERTIFICATION

I, Kenneth A. McCullum, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
     8-K required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
     report on Form 10-K of Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2005-138
     (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements
     made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
     made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 8-K for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

4.   Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required
     in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
     disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has
     fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material
     respects;

5.   All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
     for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
     assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
     securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
     Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rule 13a-18 and 15d-18 have
     been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
     disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance
     described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
     10-K.

In giving the certification above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

            JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and its officers and agents

Date:  August 29, 2006


/s/ Kenneth A. McCullum


Kenneth A. McCullum
Senior Vice President & Actuary
Hartford Life Insurance Company, as depositor
ACCEPTED 225EFJ017359179 FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 13 March 5 A9:54 Lisa Matz CLERK
#### In re Marriage of Okpala & Chigbo

110,930

07/24/2015

Denied.

Unpublished