alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Cite as 2013 Ark. App. 627

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION III

No. CR-13-242

ANDREW DESHAZER

APPELLANT

V.

STATE OF ARKANSAS

APPELLEE

Opinion Delivered November 6, 2013

APPEAL FROM THE DREW

COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT

[NO. CV-2007-139-1]

HONORABLE SAMUEL B. POPE,

JUDGE

AFFIRMED; MOTION TO

WITHDRAW GRANTED

ROBERT J. GLADWIN, Chief Judge

Appellant, Andrew Deshazer, pled guilty to the offense of theft of property. He was

sentenced to sixty months’ probation on February 25, 2008. On June 21, 2011, the State

filed a petition to revoke appellant’s probationary sentence alleging that he had violated the

terms and conditions of his probation by failing to report and in not fully paying his fees and

restitution. Appellant’s probationary sentence was not revoked at that time, but he was

ordered by the circuit court to make regular monthly payments on his outstanding balance.

A second petition to revoke was filed by the State on July 18, 2012, alleging that

appellant violated the terms and conditions of his probation by using controlled substances,

failing to submit to drug testing, failing to report, and failing to make court-ordered

payments on the restitution balance. A hearing on that petition was held on November 26,

2012, after which appellant was found guilty of violating the terms and conditions of his
Cite as 2013 Ark. App. 627

probation by using controlled substances, failing to report to his probation officer, and failing

to make court-ordered payments on the restitution balance, particularly between January and

August of 2012. The circuit court revoked his probation and sentenced him to twelve

months in the regional punishment facility pursuant to a December 7, 2012 sentencing order. 

He filed a timely notice of appeal on January 4, 2013.

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and Arkansas Supreme Court

Rule 4-3(k) (2012), appellant’s counsel has filed a motion to be relieved, stating that there

is no merit to the appeal. The motion is accompanied by an abstract and addendum of the

proceedings below, including all objections and motions decided adversely to appellant, and

a brief in which counsel explains why there is nothing in the record that would support an

appeal.

The clerk of this court served appellant with a copy of his counsel’s brief and notified

him of his right to file a pro se statement of points for reversal within thirty days. Appellant

has filed no such statement.

From our review of the record and the briefs presented to us, we find compliance

with Rule 4-3(k) and that the appeal is without merit. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to

withdraw is granted, and the revocation is affirmed.

Affirmed; motion to withdraw granted.

PITTMAN and WOOD, JJ., agree.

Potts Law Office, by: Gary W. Potts, for appellant.

No reponse.

2
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss.1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss.1350),
the undersigned, Glen M. Kassan, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
WebFinancial Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby
certify, to his knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005 of the
Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

                                      /s/ Glen M. Kassan
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Glen M. Kassan
                                      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
                                      April 21, 2006
```
# C_2018388EN.01000601.xml

| 26.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 388/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 388/6

---

Notice for the attention of the persons and entities subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2010/638/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2018/1611, and in Council Regulation (EU) No 1284/2009 as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1604 concerning restrictive measures against the Republic of Guinea

(2018/C 388/07)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons that appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2010/638/CFSP (1), as amended by Decision (CFSP) 2018/1611 (2), and in Annex II to Council Regulation (EU) No 1284/2009 (3), as implemented by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1604 (4).

The Council of the European Union has determined that the persons that appear in the above-mentioned Annexes continue to fulfil the criterion set out in Decision 2010/638/CFSP and in Regulation (EU) No 1284/2009 concerning restrictive measures against the Republic of Guinea and should therefore remain subject to the measures, as renewed by Decision (CFSP) 2018/1611.

The attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated in the web-sites in Annex III to Regulation (EU) No 1284/2009, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 8 of the Regulation).

The persons concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation before 30 June 2019, that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned list should be reconsidered, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG RELEX |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG RELEX

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The attention of the persons concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council’s decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 280, 26.10.2010, p. 10.

(2)  OJ L 268, 26.10.2018, p. 47.

(3)  OJ L 346, 23.12.2009, p. 26.

(4)  OJ L 268, 26.10.2018, p. 16.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 348 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 348

 Supporting the goals and ideals of Pancreatic Cancer Awareness Month.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 9, 2009

 Mr. Casey (for himself, Mr. Whitehouse, Mr. Schumer, Mr. Specter, Mr. 
   Cardin, Mr. Udall of Colorado, Mr. Lautenberg, Mr. Bayh, and Mr. 
 Begich) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
          Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Supporting the goals and ideals of Pancreatic Cancer Awareness Month.

Whereas approximately 42,470 people will be diagnosed with pancreatic cancer 
        this year in the United States;
Whereas pancreatic cancer is the fourth most common cause of cancer death in the 
        United States and the tenth most commonly diagnosed cancer;
Whereas 76 percent of pancreatic cancer patients die within the first year of 
        their diagnosis and only 5 percent survive more than 5 years, making 
        pancreatic cancer the deadliest form of any major cancer;
Whereas the number of new pancreatic cancer cases is projected to increase by 12 
        percent this year and by 55 percent by 2030;
Whereas there has been no significant improvement in survival rates for 
        pancreatic cancer during the last 30 years;
Whereas there are no early detection methods and minimal treatment options for 
        pancreatic cancer;
Whereas the symptoms of pancreatic cancer generally present themselves too late 
        for an optimistic prognosis, and the average survival rate of 
        individuals diagnosed with metastatic pancreatic cancer is only 3 to 6 
        months;
Whereas the incidence rate of pancreatic cancer is 50 percent higher for 
        African-Americans than for other ethnic groups; and
Whereas it would be appropriate to observe November 2009 as Pancreatic Cancer 
        Awareness Month to educate communities across the Nation about 
        pancreatic cancer and the need for research funding, early detection 
        methods, effective treatments, and treatment programs: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved, That the Senate supports the goals and ideals of 
Pancreatic Cancer Awareness Month.
                                 <all>
```
Bar Docket No. 16184

#### In the Matter of Chauncey M. Depew, *Respondent.*

(359 P.3d 33)

Dated this 17th day of August, 2015.

In a letter signed July 28, 2015, addressed to the Clerk of the Appellate Courts, respondent Chauncey M. Depew, an attorney admitted to practice law in Kansas, voluntarily surrendered his license to practice law in Kansas, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 217 (2014 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 403).

At the time the respondent surrendered his license, a complaint had been docketed by the Office of the Disciplinary Administrator for investigation. The complaint alleged that the respondent violated Kansas Rules of Professional Conduct 1.7 (2014 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 531) (conflict of interest) and 8.4 (2014 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 680) (misconduct).

This court, having examined the files of the Office of the Disciplinary Administrator, finds that the surrender of the respondent’s license should be accepted and that the respondent should be disbarred.

It Is Therefore Ordered that Chauncey M. Depew, be and he is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in Kansas, and his license and privilege to practice law are hereby revoked.

It Is Further Ordered that the Clerk of the Appellate Courts strike the name of Chauncey M. Depew from the roll of attorneys licensed to practice law in Kansas.

It Is Further Ordered that this order shall be published in the Kansas Reports, that the costs herein shall be assessed to the respondent, and that the respondent forthwith shall comply with Supreme Court Rule 218 (2014 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 414).
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, B. Francis Saul II, the Trustee, Chairman of the Board of B.F. Saul Real Estate Investment Trust (the Trust), has executed this certification in connection with the filing with the
Securities and Exchange Commission of the Trusts Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending September 30, 2006 (the Report). The undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Trust.



|                        |  |  |  |                               
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------
|Date: December 19, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ B. FRANCIS SAUL II        
|                        |  |  |  | B. Francis Saul II            
|                        |  |  |  | Trustee, Chairman of the Board



---

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Stephen R. Halpin, Jr., the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of B.F. Saul Real Estate Investment
Trust (the Trust), has executed this certification in connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Trusts Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending September 30, 2006 (the
Report). The undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.



|                        |  |  |  |                                           
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------
|Date: December 19, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ STEPHEN R. HALPIN, JR.                
|                        |  |  |  | Stephen R. Halpin, Jr.                    
|                        |  |  |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of International Automated Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, LaGrand Johnson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ LaGrand Johnson


LaGrand Johnson


Chief Financial Officer


February 18, 2011
# C_2019282EN.01006001.xml

| 20.8.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/60 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.8.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/60

---

Corrigendum to the Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on ‘Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2015/757 in order to take appropriate account of the global data collection system for ship fuel oil consumption data’

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 240 of 16 July 2019
  )

(2019/C 282/10)

On page 43, paragraph 3.1:

for:

‘This seems to be in conflict with the new amended provision of the proposal in Article 9(1)(f) (new) stating that any monitoring (on a per voyage basis) of cargo carried shall be voluntary, as the proposed change to the cargo carried is only a voluntary monitoring item and as such is not aligned with the UN IMO DCS.’,

read:

read:

‘This seems to be in conflict with the new amended provision of the proposal in Article 9(1)(f) stating that any monitoring (on a per voyage basis) of cargo carried shall be voluntary, as the proposed change to the cargo carried is only a voluntary monitoring item and as such is not aligned with the UN IMO DCS.’;

on page 43, paragraph 3.2:

for:

for:

‘The proposed Article 11(2) (new) could be amended as follows:’,

read:

read:

‘The proposed Article 11(2) could be amended as follows:’.

---
#### Katz v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue

103,667

05/20/13

Denied.

45 Kan. App. 2d 877
# Table 10.12
# Table 6.3

# RSE 6.3

# Microsoft_Word_Document1.docx

# image1.emf

# Microsoft_Word_Document2.docx

# image2.emf
No. 12-5694.

#### Patterson *v.*Rios, Warden.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 31.3

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Carl W. Hull, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Gen-Probe Incorporated; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                                      
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|DATE: November 9, 2011 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Carl W. Hull                     
|                       |  |  |  |     |  | Carl W. Hull                         
|                       |  |  |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
No. 12-169.

#### Panghat *v.*New York State Division of Human Rights.

App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 1st Jud. Dept. Cer-tiorari denied.
```

                                                                                  Exhibit 10(vii)(b)

                                  AMENDMENT NUMBER THREE TO COMMON
                                       STOCK WARRANT AGREEMENT

         On September 24, 1986, The St. Lawrence Seaway Corporation (the "Corporation") issued a Common Stock
Purchase Warrant to Bernard Zimmerman and Company, Inc., entitling the holder to purchase an aggregate of 100,000
shares of common stock, $1.00 par value, of the Corporation for $3.00 per share for a period of five (5) years
("Warrant"), pursuant to an Agreement dated September 24, 1986 (the "Warrant Agreement").  The Windward Group, LLC
is now the holder of the Warrant.  The Board of Directors and Stockholders of the Corporation approved an
amendment to the Warrant and Warrant Agreement on July 6, 1992 and August 28, 1992, respectively, the effect of
which was to extend the purchase right for five (5) additional years.  The Board of Directors approved further
amendments to the Warrant and Warrant Agreement on September 8, 1997, the effect of which was to extend the
purchase rights for five (5) additional years.  The Board of Directors approved further amendments to the Warrant
and Warrant Agreement on August 30, 2002, and extended the purchase rights through September 21, 2007.
Specifically, Section 3 of the Warrant Agreement is hereby further amended to change the Termination Date from
September 21, 2002 to September 21, 2007, and the Warrant is hereby further amended to extend the expiration date
through and including September 21, 2007.

         The Warrant and Warrant Agreement are hereby specifically referred to and incorporated as a part hereof
and in all respects other than as specifically modified herein, the terms and conditions of the Warrant and the
Warrant Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.

         This Amendment Number Three is executed on this 20th day of September, 2002.

ATTEST:                                                         THE ST. LAWRENCE SEAWAY CORPORATION

/s/ Jack C. Brown                                               By:     /s/ Daniel L. Nir
------------------                                                 ---------------------------------
Jack C. Brown                                                      Daniel L. Nir
Secretary                                                          President and Treasurer

                                                                Accepted as of September 20, 2002

                                                                THE WINDWARD GROUP, LLC

                                                                By: /s/ Joel M. Greenblatt
                                                                   ---------------------------------
                                                                   Joel M. Greenblatt
                                                                   Its: Manager
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 60 (Friday, March 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 14971]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-7868]



[[Page 14971]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

March 21, 1997.
    The Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) has submitted the following 
public information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and 
clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. 
Copies of the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the OTS 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
OTS Clearance Officer, Office of Thrift Supervision, 1700 G Street, 
NW., Washington, DC 20552.
    Dates: Written comments should be received on or before April 28, 
1997 to be assured of consideration.
    OMB Number: 1550-0016.
    Form Number: OTS Form 1588.
    Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    Title: Merger Applications.
    Description: The Bank Merger Act and the OTS merger regulations 
implementing that act require a savings association that proposes to 
combine with either another savings association or insure depository 
institution to obtain written approval from the OTS.
    Respondents: Savings and Loan Associations and Savings Banks.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 40.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent: 40 hours.
    Frequency of Response: Once per application.
    Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 1,600 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Colleen M. Devine, (202) 906-6025, Office of 
Thrift Supervision, 1700 G Street, NW., Washington, DC 20552.
    OMB Reviewer: Alexander Hunt, (202) 395-7860, Office of Management 
and Budget, Room 10226, New Executive Office Building, Washington, D.C. 
20503.
Catherine C. M. Teti,
Director, Records Management and Information Policy.
[FR Doc. 97-7868 Filed 3-27-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6720-01-P
<Page> 1


                                  Exhibit 23.2



                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS


    We hereby consent to the references to our firm, in the context in which
they appear, and to our reserve estimates as of December 31, 2010, included in
the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Pyramid Oil Company for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2010, as well as in the notes to the financial statements
included therein.  We also hereby consent (1) to the incorporation by
reference of the references to our firm, in the context in which they appear,
and to our reserve estimates as of December 31, 2010, into Pyramid Oil
Company's previously filed Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No.
333-163885), and (2) to the filing of our report dated March 14, 2011 as an
exhibit to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Pyramid Oil Company.


MHA PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS, LLC


By:  /s/ Alan A. Burzlaff
        -----------------
        Alan A. Burzlaff
        President MHA California


Bakersfield, California
March 25, 2011