alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.101
 Gen-Probe Incorporated  Deferred Issuance Restricted Stock Award Grant Notice  (The 2003 Incentive Award Plan)
 Company Plan Shares Award Agreement
 Employee:
    
    
    
    Carl W. HullDate of Grant:Number of Shares Subject to Award:Vesting Schedule:Issuance Schedule:
    
    The Shares will be issued in accordance with the issuance schedule set forth in Section 2.4 of the Agreement.
 Additional Terms/Acknowledgements:
 Other Agreements:
    
    None
 Gen-Probe Incorporated
    
    Carl W. HullBy:R. William Bowen
    
    
    
    Carl W. HullTitle: Sr. Vice President and General Counsel
    
    Date:Date:
 Attachments:
    
    Gen-Probe Incorporated 2003 Incentive Award
Plan and Deferred Issuance Restricted Stock
Award Agreement
 1




---



##### 



Attachment I
 Gen-Probe Incorporated 2003 Incentive Award Plan
  2




---



##### 



Attachment II  Deferred Issuance Restricted Stock Award Agreement
 GEN-PROBE INCORPORATED
2003 INCENTIVE AWARD PLAN
DEFERRED ISSUANCE RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD AGREEMENT
 Grant Notice Agreement Company Plan Award
 Code
    ARTICLE I
DEFINITIONS
 General
 Cause Cause
 3




---



##### 



Disability Disability
 Secretary Secretary
 Termination of Service Termination of Service
 ARTICLE II
DETAILS OF AWARD
 Purchase Price Consideration
 Vesting
 Dividends
 Date of Issuance
   4




---



##### 



Capitalization Adjustments to Number of Shares
 Securities Law Compliance Securities Act
 Limitations on Transfer
 Corporate Event
 Withholding Obligations
   Unsecured Obligation
 5




---



##### 



Vesting Consideration
 ARTICLE III
OTHER PROVISIONS
 Administration
 Transfers
 Lock-Up Period Managing Underwriter
 Restrictive Legends and Stop-Transfer Orders
  6




---



##### 



Notices
 Titles
 Construction
 Conformity to Securities Laws
 Amendments
 7




---



##### 



Governing Plan Document.
 Severability
 Effect on Other Employee Benefit Plans
  8
Swanson, Brian (OST) DOT- O^V- l^^f/ " IT U 

From: Going Places [goingplacestrvl@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2010 12:35 PM 

To: Devany, Dennis (OST); Swanson, Brian (OST) 

Subject: Manistee Blacker Essential Air Service 

April 20, 2010 

Dear Dennis DeVany & Brian Swanson: 

We attended the Airport Authority Board meeting on April 12, 2010 at the 

Manistee Blacker Airport regarding Great Lakes Aviation as the connmercial 

carrier out of Manistee. We realize there have been sonne complaints regarding 

the service with cancelled flights due to mechanical difficulties, employee 

problems and, of course, the weather. We as the local travel agency are very 

aware of those complaints from unhappy travelers. However, with all the 

problems involved we still believe that Great Lakes Aviation is is the best provider 

and value for Manistee Blacker Airport. 

We believe Milwaukee as a hub, is a far better option than Chicago Midway. 

When people travel two things are a priority, convenience and price. 

Because Great Lakes is offering a 4 city package as an all or nothing option, 

we feel that there would be more planes in the area to help remedy cancellations 

and delays if necessary with backups nearby and available. Milwaukee is a 

great hub as it is not too large or not too small. Connections out of Milwaukee 

include most major carriers with code shares and baggage agreements. With 

code shares the prices are usually a good value, which all travelers want these days. 

Milwaul<ee offers connections with nonstops to several major cities in the United 

States. It's carriers include United, U.S. Airways, American, Continental, Delta, Midwest, 

AirTran, and Frontier Airlines plus charter flights. Milwaukee is also a 

facilitator of Funjet vacations and Apple Vacations along with Delta Dream 

Vacations, and American and United Vacations packages. Most of these 

can work with Great Lakes to get people to and from many destinations. 

Chicago Midway is a small airport in comparison to Milwaukee. Chicago 

Midway has very limited flight s and carriers . Delta, Midwest, Frontier, 

AirTran and Southwest operate out of Midway and only a few flights to major 

destinations are nonstop. With this in mind, it means another transfer of 

planes and longer travel times for the customer. The exception to this is 

Southwest, but that poses problems if people would want to check luggage; 

as Southwest has no baggage agreements with any other airline. 

With those limitations in mind we feel Chicago Midway is a poor choice of 

air service for Manistee and support Great Lakes Aviation as our essential 

air carrier. 

Respectfully Submitted, 

Kellie A. Mowry, Cynthia L. Kaminski and Patti K. Uhazie 

Owners/Agents Going Places Tours & Travel, Manistee, MI 

The New Busy is not the too busy. Combine all your e-mail accounts with Hotmail. Get busy.
# C_2018222EN.01000701.xml

| 26.6.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 222/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.6.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 222/7

---

Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EU) 2017/2063 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Venezuela apply

(2018/C 222/06)

The attention of data subjects is drawn to the following information in accordance with Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1):

1

The legal basis for this processing operation is Council Regulation (EU) 2017/2063 (2).

2

The controller of this processing operation is the Council of the European Union represented by the Director General of DG C (Foreign Affairs, Enlargement, Civil Protection) of the General Secretariat of the Council and the department entrusted with the processing operation is the Unit 1C of DG C that can be contacted at:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The purpose of the processing operation is the establishment and updating of the list of persons subject to restrictive measures in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2017/2063.

The data subjects are the natural persons who fulfil the listing criteria as laid down in that Regulation.

The personal data collected includes data necessary for the correct identification of the person concerned, the Statement of Reasons and any other data related thereto.

The personal data collected may be shared as necessary with the European External Action Service and the Commission.

Without prejudice to restrictions provided for in Article 20(1)(a) and (d) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, requests for access, as well as requests for rectification or objection will be answered in accordance with Section 5 of Council Decision 2004/644/EC (3).

3

Personal data will be retained for 5 years from the moment the data subject has been removed from the list of persons subject to the asset freeze or the validity of the measure has expired, or for the duration of court proceedings in the event they had been started.

Data subjects may have recourse to the European Data Protection Supervisor in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.

---

(1)  OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 295, 14.11.2017, p. 21.

2

(3)  OJ L 296, 21.9.2004, p. 16.

3

---
# Table 9.1

# RSE 9.1

# Microsoft_Word_Document1.docx

# image1.emf

# Microsoft_Word_Document2.docx

# image2.emf
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, David T. Nguyen, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 of the annual reporton Form 10-K/A of Santa Fe Financial Corporation;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

 

Date: August 24, 2012	

 

/s/ David T. Nguyen

David T. Nguyen

Treasurer and Controller

(Principal Financial Officer)
#### Farley v. Above Par Transportation

110,507

07/24/2015

Denied.

50 Kan. App. 2d 866
No. 12-5976.

#### Bugg *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
##### 



Exhibit 15

August 8, 2003

Accountants Acknowledgment



| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | We acknowledge the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (Form S-8 No. 33-78340, No. 333-41379, No. 333-45524 and No.
333-101289) of OptimumCare Corporation of our report dated August 8, 2003
with respect to the condensed consolidated financial statements of
OptimumCare Corporation which appears on page 3 of this Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003.

/S/ Lesley, Thomas, Schwarz & Postma, Inc.
A Professional Accountancy Corporation
Newport Beach, California.

18
#### State v. Brunt

111,402

02/09/2016

Denied.

Unpublished
Exhibit 32.1

Statement of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of
San Diego Gas & Electric (the "Company") certifies that:

(i)	the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission for the year ended
December 31, 2004 (the "Annual Report") fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and

(ii)	the information contained in the Annual Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.



February 23, 2005
                                             /S/ EDWIN A. GUILES
                                           ______________________
                                             Edwin A. Guiles
                                             Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Dawn H. Bertsche, Senior Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Multi-Color Corporation (the Company), certify pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 6, 2008



By:

/s/ Dawn H. BertscheDawn H. BertscheSenior Vice President Finance, Chief Financial
Officer and Secretary
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 63 (Wednesday, April 2, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 15726]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-8340]



[[Page 15726]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service


Notice of Receipt of Application for Endangered Species Permit

    The following applicant has applied for a permit to conduct certain 
activities with endangered species. This notice is provided pursuant to 
Section 10(c) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.):
    Applicant: Kevin W. Markham, Environmental Services, Inc., Raleigh, 
North Carolina, PRT-826915.
    The applicant requests a permit to take (survey for, handle for 
examination and identification, and collect and retain dead shells) the 
dwarf-wedge mussel, Alasmidonta heterodon, Appalachian elktoe, 
Alasmidonta raveneliana, Tar River spinymussel, Elliptio steinstansana, 
Carolina heelsplitter, Lasmigona decorata, and little-wing 
pearlymussel, Pegias fabula throughout these species' ranges in North 
Carolina for the purpose of enhancement of survival of the species.
    Written data or comments on these applications should be submitted 
to: Regional Permit Biologist, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1875 
Century Boulevard, Suite 200, Atlanta, Georgia 30345. All data and 
comments must be received by May 2, 1997.
    Documents and other information submitted with this application are 
available for review, subject to the requirements of the Privacy Act 
and Freedom of Information Act, by any party who submits a written 
request for a copy of such documents to the following office within 30 
days of the date of publication of this notice: U.S. Fish and Wildlife 
Service, 1875 Century Boulevard, Suite 200, Atlanta, Georgia 30345 
(Attn: David Dell, Permit Biologist). Telephone: 404/679-7313; Fax: 
404/679-7081.

    Dated: March 27, 1997.
C. Monty Halcomb,
Acting Regional Director.
[FR Doc. 97-8340 Filed 4-1-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
#### State v. Dulaney

106,086

09/04/13

Denied.

Unpublished
OPINION OF THE PROCURADORIA-GERAL DA FAZENDA NACIONAL OF FEDERAL REP. OF BRAZIL


 Exhibit 4(4) 
  
 June 19, 2003 
  
  
 Minister of Finance 
 Ministry of Finance 
 Federative Republic of Brazil 
 Esplanada dos Ministérios 
 Bloco P 
 70048-900, Brasília-DF 
 BRAZIL 
  
  
  

	Re:	  	 Federative Republic of Brazil
 Registration Statement on Schedule B

	  	 

  
  
 Ladies and Gentlemen: 
  
 I, the Deputy Attorney General of the National Treasury of the Ministry of Finance of the Federative Republic of Brazil (“Brazil”), have
reviewed the above-referenced Registration Statement (the “Registration Statement”) filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”), including the Prospectus constituting a part thereof,
the form of the Fiscal Agency Agreement including the forms of Note attached thereto, each as amended by Amendment No. 1 dated as of April 28, 2003 (the “Fiscal Agency Agreement”) previously filed as part of Brazil’s Registration
Statement on Schedule B (Registration No. 333-6682) and made a part of the Registration Statement and the form of the Underwriting Agreement (the “Underwriting Agreement”) previously filed as part of Brazil’s Registration Statement on
Schedule B (Registration No. 333-6682) and made a part of the Registration Statement, pursuant to which Brazil is registering certain debt securities and warrants to purchase such debt securities (collectively, the “Securities”).

  
 The issuance of the Securities has been authorized pursuant to
Resolution No. 57 dated November 10, 1995 of the Federal Senate of Brazil, as amended by Resolution No. 51 dated June 10, 1997 of the Federal Senate of Brazil, Resolution No. 23 dated June 29, 1999 of the Federal Senate of Brazil, Resolution No. 74
dated December 19, 2000 of the Federal Senate of Brazil and Resolution No. 34 dated June 28, 2002 of the Federal Senate of Brazil, and Resolution No. 69 dated September 12, 1996 of the Federal Senate of Brazil. 
  
 It is my opinion that the Securities have been duly authorized, and when
executed and delivered by Brazil and authenticated pursuant to the Fiscal Agency Agreement and delivered to and paid for by the underwriters pursuant to the Underwriting Agreement, the Prospectus (including, without limitation, the applicable
Prospectus Supplement and Pricing Supplement) and any amendment or supplement thereto, the Securities will constitute valid and legally binding direct and unconditional obligations of Brazil under the present laws of Brazil. 






 Minister of Finance 
 June 19, 2003 
 Page 2 
  
  
 I hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement and to the use of my name under the heading “Validity of the Securities” in the Registration Statement. In giving the foregoing consent, I do not thereby admit that I am in the category of persons whose consent is
required under Section 7 of the Act or the rules and regulations of the Commission thereunder. 
  

	 Very truly yours,

	
	 /S/    DANIEL RODRIGUES
ALVES

	

	 Daniel Rodrigues Alves

	 Deputy Attorney General of the
     National Treasury of Brazil
EXHIBIT 11
RUDDICK CORPORATION
STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

                                                           FISCAL YEAR ENDED
                                                   ---------------------------
                                                     OCTOBER 3,  SEPTEMBER 27,
                                                       1999            1998
                                                   -------------  ------------
NET INCOME PER SHARE COMPUTED AS FOLLOWS:
BASIC:
  1.  Net Income available to common
      shareholders                                $  50,714,128  $  46,771,696
                                                   =============  ============

  2.  Weighted Average Common Shares
      Outstanding - Basic                            46,511,523     46,667,416

  3.  Basic net income per share
      (Item 1 divided by Item 2)                  $        1.09  $        1.00
                                                   =============  ============

DILUTED:
  1.  Net Income available to common
      shareholders                                $  50,714,128  $  46,771,696
                                                   =============  ============

  2.  Weighted Average Common Shares
      Outstanding - Basic                            46,511,523     46,667,416

  3.  Weighted potential shares under
       stock options computed for the
       periods using the Treasury Stock Method.         235,127        297,007
                                                   -------------  ------------
  4.  Weighted Average Common Shares
        Outstanding - Diluted Common Equivalent
        Shares Outstanding                           46,746,650     46,964,423
                                                   =============  ============

  5.  Net Income Per Share (Item 1
       divided by Item 4)                         $        1.08  $        1.00
                                                   =============  ============
tdnt_ex41.htm

EXHIBIT 4.1
  
  
  
  
 	 
	1
	

	 

  
  
 	 
	2
	

	 

  
  
 	 
	3
	

	 

  
  
 	 
	4
	

	 

  
  
 	 
	5
	

	 

  
  
 	 
	6
	

	 

  
  
 	 
	7
	

	 

  
  
 	 
	8
	

	 

  
  
 	 
	9
	

	 

  
  
 	 
	10
	

	 

  
  
 	 
	11
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Joel M. Greenblatt, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of The St. Lawrence Seaway Corporation; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of thesmall business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officerand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the small business issuer and have: 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions aboutthe effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The smallbusiness issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small businessissuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer ‘s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting. 

Date: June 27, 2007
#### Sims v. State

111,244

02/09/2016

Denied.

Unpublished