alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2020014EN.01012901.xml

| 15.1.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 14/129 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 14/129

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on ‘Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 1309/2013 on the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (2014-2020)’

(COM(2019) 397 final — 2019/0180 (COD))

(2020/C 14/19)

| Consultation | European Parliament, 16.9.2019
  Council, 13.9.2019 |
| --- | --- |
| Legal basis | Article 175(3) and 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union |
| Section responsible | Consultative Commission on Industrial Change |
| Adopted at plenary session | 25 and 26 September 2019 |
| Plenary session No | 546 |
| Outcome of vote
  (for/against/abstentions) | 112/0/3 |

Consultation

European Parliament, 16.9.2019

Council, 13.9.2019

Legal basis

Article 175(3) and 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Section responsible

Consultative Commission on Industrial Change

Adopted at plenary session

25 and 26 September 2019

Plenary session No

546

Outcome of vote

(for/against/abstentions)

112/0/3

Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 546th plenary session of 25 and 26 September (meeting of 25 September), by 112 votes to 0 with 3 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Brussels, 25 September 2019.

The President

of the European Economic and Social Committee

Luca JAHIER

---
EXHIBIT 31.1CERTIFICATIONSI, Ron E. Hooper, certify that1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Marine Petroleum Trust for which Bankof America, N.A. acts as Trustee;2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; andc) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.     Date: February 14, 2007 /s/ RON E. HOOPER         Ron E. Hooper    Senior Vice President Royalty Managementon behalf of Bank of America Private Bank,not in its individual capacity but solelyas the trustee of Marine Petroleum Trust
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of LSB Industries, Inc. (“LSB”) on Form
10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report").  I, Jack E.
Golsen, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of LSB, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      LSB.








/s/ Jack E. Golsen


Jack E.
Golsen


Chairman
of the Board and


Chief
Executive Officer


(Principal
Executive officer)








May 6,
2010








This
certification is furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission solely for
purpose of 18 U.S.C. §1350 subject to the knowledge standard contained therein,
and not for any other purpose.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MAY 11, 2022

NO. 03

- 21

- 00017

- CV

5653.041 Acre Ranch, L.P. and John McCall , Appellant s

v.

Lewis

- Watkins

- Farmer Agency d/b/a Watkins Insurance Group , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 33R D DIS TRICT COURT OF BURNET COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES TRIANA, KELLY, AND JONES VACATED AND DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE JONES

This is an appeal from the order for severan ce and final judgment signed by the trial court on

December 10, 2020. Having reviewed the record, it appears that the trial court lacked

jurisdiction over the third

- party action and severed case. Therefore, the Court vacates the trial

court’s judgment an d dismisses the cause for want of subject matter juri sdiction. The appellants

shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below

.
<PAGE>   1


Exhibit 21
----------

<TABLE>

                                  SUBSIDIARIES
<CAPTION>

                                                       Jurisdiction of
               Name                                      Incorporation
------------------------------------               -------------------------  
<S>                                                <C>
Dirt Devil, Inc. (1)                               Ohio              
                                                                     
Royal Appliance Receivable, Inc. (1)               Ohio              
                                                                     
Royal Appliance FSC Inc. (1)                       U.S.V.I.          
                                                                     
Royal Appliance International Co. (1)              Delaware          
                                                                     
Dirt Devil, Ltd. (2)                               United Kingdom    
                                                                     
</TABLE>
---------------

(1)  Company is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Registrant. 
(2)  Company is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Royal Appliance International Co.
No. 12-5865.

#### Capozzi *v.*United States.

C. A. 1st Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
#### State v. Lamb

107,555

07/19/13

Denied. .

Unpublished
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2019107EN.01001101.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 21.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 107/11 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9064 — Telia Company/Bonnier Broadcasting Holding)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 107/06)

1.

On 15 March 2019, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2019107EN.01001101-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Telia Company AB (Sweden), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Bonnier Broadcasting Holding AB (Sweden). |

Telia Company AB acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of Bonnier Broadcasting Holding AB.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for Telia Company AB: provision of mobile and fixed telecommunications services, broadband and television services, and wholesale network access (carrier services),

—   for Bonnier Broadcasting Holding AB: provision of television services and production of news and other journalism content.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9064 — Telia Company/Bonnier Broadcasting Holding

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2019107EN.01001101-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

---
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 261 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 261

 Designating September 12, 2009, as ``National Day of Encouragement''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 10, 2009

   Mr. Pryor (for himself and Mrs. Lincoln) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Designating September 12, 2009, as ``National Day of Encouragement''.

Whereas negative images, stories, and influences in the day-to-day lives of 
        Americans can detrimentally affect their emotional well-being, 
        interactions with others, and general demeanor;
Whereas a group of teenagers participating in a leadership forum at Harding 
        University in Searcy, Arkansas, identified a lack of encouragement as 
        one of the greatest problems facing young people today;
Whereas the youth of our Nation need guidance, inspiration, and reassurance to 
        counteract this negativity and to develop the qualities of character 
        essential for future leadership in our country;
Whereas a National Day of Encouragement would serve as a reminder to 
        counterbalance and overcome negative influences, and would also provide 
        much-needed encouragement and support to others;
Whereas following the events of September 11, 2001, thousands of people of the 
        United States made sacrifices in order to bring help and healing to the 
        victims and their families, inspiring and encouraging the Nation; and
Whereas the renewed feelings of unity, hope, selflessness, and encouragement 
        that began on September 12, 2001, are the same feelings that the 
        National Day of Encouragement is meant to recapture and spread: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates September 12, 2009, as ``National Day of 
        Encouragement'';
            (2) acknowledges the importance of encouragement and 
        positive influences in the lives of all people; and
            (3) urges the people of the United States to encourage 
        others, whether it be through an act of service, a thoughtful 
        letter, or words of kindness and inspiration, and to thereby 
        boost the morale of all.
                                 <all>
```
#### State v. Bailey

107,825

07/19/13

Denied

Unpublished
|                                                                
|----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                  
|View History:                                                   
|                                                                
|Alabama Natural Gas Industrial Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                
|                                                                
|Alabama Natural Gas Industrial Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |         | 201,240 | 199,192 | 204,261
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 199,904 | 155,054 | 159,938 | 158,512 | 163,255 | 151,102 | 149,973 | 150,484 | 142,389 | 131,228
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 144,938 | 153,358 | 171,729 | 179,511 | 187,661 | 186,819 | 192,424 | 196,654 | 219,057 | 217,040
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 209,124 | 233,072 | 212,943 | 219,729 |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,049,826
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  720,278
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,272,440
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,153,298
<PP&E>                                       2,296,339
<DEPRECIATION>                                 863,111
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,721,981
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          585,017
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        31,937
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,191,579
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,721,981
<SALES>                                      1,201,432
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,201,432
<CGS>                                          709,300
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  368,435
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,148
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                152,080
<INCOME-TAX>                                    22,110
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            129,970
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   129,970
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04
        

</TABLE>
#### State v. Flores-Sanchez

110,457

08/20/2015

Denied

Unpublished
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 66 (Monday, April 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 16626]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-8899]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Meeting; Nineteenth Annual Meeting of the Board of 
Directors

TIME & DATE: 3:00 p.m., Wednesday, April 16, 1997.

PLACE: Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation, 1325, G Street, N.W., 
Suite 800, Board Room, Washington, D.C. 20005.

STATUS: Open.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jeffrey T. Bryson, General 
Counsel/Secretary 202/376-2441.

AGENDA: 

I. Call to Order
II. Approval of Minutes: January 23, 1997 Regular Meeting
III. Election of Chairman
IV. Election of Vice Chairman
V. Audit Committee Report: April 11, 1997 Meeting
    a. Appointment of Internal Audit Director
VI. Committee Appointments:
    a. Audit Committee
    b. Budget Committee
    c. Personnel Committee
VII. Election of Officers
VIII. Board Appointment
IX. Treasurer's Report
X. Executive Director's Quarterly Management Report
XI. Adjourn.
Jeffrey T. Bryson,
General Counsel/Secretary
[FR Doc. 97-8899 Filed 4-2-97; 4:39 pm]
BILLING CODE 7570-01-M
#### State v. Sanchez

105,051

04/08/13

Denied.

Unpublished
#### State v. Elnicki

110,516

10/07/2015

Denied

Unpublished
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7728

JOHNNY LOUIS WARDLAW,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

LLOYD L. WATERS; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE

OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. M. J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-96-3042-

MJG)

Submitted: February 27, 1997 Decided: March 13, 1997

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Johnny Louis Wardlaw, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994), amended

by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L.

No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on

the reasoning of the district court. Wardlaw v. Waters, No. CA-96-

3042-MJG (D. Md. Oct. 23, 1996). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### In re Marriage of Johnson

110,498

07/22/2015

Denied.

50 Kan. App. 2d 687
#### State v. Palmer

108,750

02/12/14

Denied.

Unpublished
PP SUB.AGR SHARES No broker



EXHIBIT 10.5



AGREEMENT





THIS AGREEMENT dated the 9th day of October, 2002.



BETWEEN:



                LOCKE B. GOLDSMITH, of Suite 301, 1855 Balsam Street,

                Vancouver, BC



                (hereinafter called "Goldsmith")



                                                                     OF THE FIRST PART





AND:





                CLIVE de LARRABEITI, of South Lodge, Paxhill Park, Lindfield,

                West Sussex, UK

                (hereinafter called "De Larrabeiti")

                                                                                                             OF THE SECOND PART

                (collectively referred to as the "Parties")

WHEREAS:



A.     Goldsmith owns the title of the mineral interest in claims of Silver Stone 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6,

        in the Mining Division of Slocan, British Columbia and the information related to these

        claims.

B.     De Larrabeiti wishes to acquire these titles of the mineral interest and obtain the related

       information from Goldsmith.



NOW THEREFORE THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSES that in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained and other good and valuable consideration, the Parties agree as follows:



1.     Goldsmith agrees to sell and De Larrabeiti agrees to purchase the following mineral titles:



a)      Silver Stone 1, Tenure No. 301217, 100% of Title being sold;

b)      Silver Stone 2, Tenure No. 301218, 100% of Title being sold;

c)      Silver Stone 3, Tenure No. 301225, 100% of Title being sold;

d)      Silver Stone 4, Tenure No. 301226, 100% of Title being sold;

e)      Silver Stone 5, Tenure No. 301227, 100% of Title being sold;

f)      Silver Stone 6, Tenure No. 301228, 100% of Title being sold;





2.     Goldsmith agrees to provide to De Larrabeiti information related to these mineral claims.

3.     The Parties agrees that De Larrabeiti shall pay to Goldsmith a total amount of CDN $600

        in cash on the date of this Agreement.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this agreement the day and year first above written.



Locke B. Goldsmith

in the presence of:



/s/ D. Alex Caldwell"

Witness Name - Signature



D. Alex Caldwell

Witness Name - Print
/s/ "Locke B. Goldsmith"___

LOCKE B. GOLDSMITH

















602 - 595 Howe Street

Address



Vancouver, BC

City, Province


Corporate Secretary

Occupation


Clive de Larrabeiti

in the presence of:


/s/ "B.M. de Larrabeiti"

Witness Name - Signature

B. de Larrabeiti

Witness Name - Print
/s/ "Clive de Larrabeiti"

















South Lodge, Paxhill Park               CLIVE de LARRABEITI

Address



Lindfield, W. Sussex, UK

City, Province

Teacher

Occupation
No. 12-6184.

#### Antonio-Agusta, aka Artiaga *v.*United States.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

Exhibit 10.1  


 
 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS    
    


        We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-12200) filed on June 27, 2000,
of Rhodia of our report dated April 4, 2003 relating to the financial statements, which appears in this Form 20-F. 


Paris,
France, 


June 26,
2003 


PricewaterhouseCoopers  











QuickLinks


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
#### State v. Gray

111,964

07/22/2016

Denied.

Unpubhshed