alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 256 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 256

   Recognizing the importance of ``National Drug Facts Chat Day'' on 
                           November 10, 2009.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 9, 2009

Mr. Levin submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
          Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Recognizing the importance of ``National Drug Facts Chat Day'' on 
                           November 10, 2009.

Whereas the National Institute on Drug Abuse created ``National Drug Facts Chat 
        Day'' to provide the opportunity for school-aged youth and teachers in 
        classrooms across the United States to ask questions of the Nation's 
        leading experts in the field of drug abuse and addiction;
Whereas on October 12, 2007, the first annual Drug Facts Chat Day yielded over 
        35,000 questions from school-aged youth across the United States, 
        providing accurate information on drug abuse and addiction;
Whereas the National Survey on Drug Use and Health indicated that, in 2007, 
        nearly 8 percent of youth in the United States between 12 and 17 years 
        of age met diagnostic criteria for abuse or dependence (addiction) to 
        illegal drugs or alcohol;
Whereas the Monitoring the Future Study has yielded encouraging news of 
        generally declining past-month illicit drug use rates for school-aged 
        youth, noting a 24 percent decline from 2001 to 2008 by students in the 
        8th, 10th, and 12th grades combined;
Whereas declines in youth cigarette smoking, now at its lowest rate since the 
        Monitoring the Future Survey began collecting data in 1975, will 
        translate into fewer deaths associated with the myriad medical 
        consequences of smoking;
Whereas while progress continues to be made, troubling trends still abound, 
        including widespread abuse of prescription drugs among youth in the 
        United States;
Whereas research shows that as the perceived risks associated with drugs 
        increases, the abuse of such drugs decreases;
Whereas youth often get information about drugs, drug abuse, and addiction from 
        unreliable and inaccurate sources; and
Whereas ``National Drug Facts Chat Day'' is on November 10, 2009: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) recognizes the importance of ``National Drug Facts Chat 
        Day''; and
            (2) urges teachers, schools, and students to participate by 
        submitting questions and using the information provided to 
        increase their understanding of the science of drug abuse and 
        addiction among school-aged youth.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1
 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, (15 U.S.C. 78m(a)); and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Safeguard.
 SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.Date: March 4, 2011
    /s/ Peter J. BoniPeter J. BoniPresident and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 23


                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
reports included in this Form 10-K, into the Company's previously filed
Post-Effective Amendment No. 6 to the Form S-8 Registration Statement File No.
2-69991, into the Company's previously filed Post-Effective Amendment No. 4 to
the Form S-8 Registration Statement File No. 2-66025, into the Company's
previously filed S-8 Registration Statement File No. 33-37366, into the
Company's previously filed Form S-8 Registration Statement File No. 33-37367,
into the Company's previously filed Form S-8 Registration Statement File No.
333-16725, into the Company's previously filed Form S-8 Registration Statement
File No. 333-28839, and into the Company's previously filed Post Effective
Amendment No. 1 to the Form S-3 Registration Statement File No. 333-39559.




                                       ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

  Dallas, Texas,
  September 16, 1998
No. 12-5778.

#### Blach *v.*Dovey, Director, Adult Institutions, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**EXHIBIT32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OFTREASURER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of MagStarTechnologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for thefiscal year ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph A. Petrich,Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
| /s/    Joseph A. Petrich |   |
|----------------------------------------------|--------|
| Joseph A. Petrich                            |
| Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer        |
| March 24, 2004                          |

 

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent requiredby such Act, be deemed to be filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to theliability of that section.

----
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION FOR EN BANC RECONSIDERATION

Appellate case name: Timothy Ryan Richert V. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-10-00901-CR

Trial court case number: 1262576

Trial court: 185th District Court of Harris County

Date motion filed: March 18, 2013

Party filing motion: Appellant

It is ordered that the motion for en banc reconsideration is DENIED GRANTED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Terry Jennings 

 Acting Individually Acting for the Court

Panel consists of: Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings, Keyes, Higley, Bland, Sharp, 

Massengale, Brown, and Huddle 

Date: April 9, 2013
#### State v. Herndon

107,064

08/19/13

Denied.

Unpublished
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 67 (Tuesday, April 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 16804]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-8887]



[[Page 16804]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Project No. 11499-000 Tennessee]


Armstrong Energy Resources; Notice of Extension of Time to File 
Scoping Comments

April 2, 1997.
    The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and Tennessee 
Valley Authority (TVA) jointly conducted a second public scoping 
meeting for Armstrong Energy Resources' revised proposal on March 4, 
1997. At that meeting, and in the revised scoping document I and notice 
of public scoping meeting, issued February 3, 1997, FERC and TVA set 
the deadline date for filing comments in response to the revised 
scoping document I at March 31, 1997.
    By this notice, the deadline date for filing comments in response 
to revised scoping document I is extended to April 30, 1997. Any 
comments previously expressed on scoping document I will be considered 
and need not be repeated.
    Scoping comments are to be filed with the Secretary, Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, and 
with Linda Oxendine, Senior Specialist, Tennessee Valley Authority, 400 
West Summit Hill Drive, WT8C-K, Knoxville, TN 37902. All written 
correspondence should clearly show the following captions on the first 
page: Laurel Branch Pumped Storage Project, FERC Project No. 11499-000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, please contact Eddie R. Crouse, FERC, (202) 
219-2794, or Linda Oxendine, TVA, (423) 632-3440.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-8887 Filed 4-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 10(a)(6)

[Chaikin, Cohen, Rubin & Gilboa. Letterhead]

June 18, 2003

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS 

We hereby consent to the the inclusion in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Scitex Corporation Ltd. (“Scitex”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 (the “Annual Report”), and to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of Scitex on Form S-8 (Registration No. 33-34233, Registration No. 33-46861, Registration No. 33-87614, Registration No. 33-97622, Registration No. 33-97624 and Registration No. 33-39364), of our Report dated February 16, 2003, with respect to the financial statements Objet Geometries Ltd. as of December 31, 2002, which are included in the Annual Report.

 

		 	Sincerely yours,

		 	 
		 	/s/
          Chaikin, Cohen, Rubin & Gilboa

		 	Chaikin, Cohen,
    Rubin & Gilboa

		 	Certified
        Public Accountants (Isr.)
#### Zimmerman v. Brown

108,087

10/30/13

Denied. ...

49 Kan. App. 2d 143
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 72 (Tuesday, April 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 18356]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-9628]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Office of the Secretary


San Pedro Riparian National Conservation Area Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: San Pedro Riparian National Conservation Area Advisory 
Committee notice of renewal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice is published in accordance with Section 9(a)(2) of 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (Public Law 92-463). Notice 
is hereby given that the Secretary of the Interior has renewed the 
Bureau of Land Management's (BLM) San Pedro Riparian National 
Conservation Area Advisory Committee.
    The purpose of the Committee is to provide advice to the Secretary 
of the Interior, through the Director, BLM with respect to the 
preparation and implementation of the comprehensive plan for the long-
range management and protection of the San Pedro Riparian National 
Conservation Area.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melanie Wilson, Intergovernmental 
Affairs, (640), Bureau of Land Management, 1620 L Street, 4th Floor, 
Washington, D.C. 20240, telephone (202) 452-0377.

    Dated: February 18, 1997.
Bruce Babbitt,
Secretary of the Interior.
[FR Doc. 97-9628 Filed 4-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-84-P
EXHIBIT 31.1

I, G. Howard Collingwood, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of Ruby Mining Co.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))and internal control over financial
reporting(as defined in Exchange Act rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the
registrant and we have:

     a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report
          is being prepared;

     b.   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

     c.   disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
          most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
          reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting;

5.The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a.   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
          adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
          summarize and report financial information; and

     b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting;


Dated:  April 26, 2004                      By:  /s/ G. Howard Collingwood
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 G. Howard Collingwood
                                                 Chief Executive Officer



                                       42
<PAGE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 8 (Monday, January 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 1743]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-693]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. CP97-172-000]


Shell Gas Pipeline Company; Notice of Application for a Blanket 
Certificate

January 7, 1997.
    Take notice that on December 30, 1996, Shell Gas Pipeline Company 
(SGPC), 200 North Dairy Ashford, Houston, Texas 77079, filed in Docket 
No. CP97-172-000 for a Blanket Certificate of Public Convenience and 
Necessity under Subpart F Part 157 of the Commission's Regulations for 
a blanket certificate of public convenience and necessity, all as more 
fully set forth in the application which is on file with the Commission 
and open to public inspection.
    SGPC requests a 157 blanket certificate to construct or acquire and 
operate certain natural gas facilities that are necessary to provide 
transportation under Section 284.213 of the commission's Regulations. 
SGPC also states that it was granted a blanket transportation 
certificate by order issued in Docket No. CP96-156-002, and had rates 
accepted by the Commission in the same Order. SGPC further states that 
it has no budget-type certificates and that it will comply with the 
terms, conditions and procedures specified in Subpart F of Part 157 of 
the Regulations.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to make any protest with 
reference to said petition should on or before January 14, 1997, file 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20426, a 
motion to intervene or a protest in accordance with the requirements of 
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 384.214 or 
385.211) and the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.10). 
All protests filed with the Commission will be considered by it in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken but will not serve to 
make the protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to 
become a party to a proceeding or to participate as a party in any 
hearing therein must file a motion to intervene in accordance with the 
Commission's Rules.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-693 Filed 1-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
July 21, 2014

Mr. James Peters

Merrill Aviation & Defense

1023 South Wheeler Street

Saginaw, MI 48602

Dear Mr. Peters:

This is in response to your April 8, 2014, letter sent to the public docket (No. FAA-2014-

0243) petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Merrill Aviation & 

Defense (Merrill Aviation), for an exemption from § 45.23(b) of Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations (14 CFR). You petitioned the FAA to allow Merrill Aviation to use 2-inch 

lettering for the word “Experimental” on its unmanned aircraft. 

Rather than processing an exemption for the 2-inch lettering, the FAA will instead issue 

Merrill Aviation an alternative marking approval letter. This approval letter will be issued 

based on § 45.22(d) which states, “If, due to the configuration of an aircraft, it is impossible 

for a person to mark it in accordance with §§ 45.21 and 45.23 through 45.33, he may apply to 

the FAA for a different marking procedure.” 

The Aircraft Engineering Division is the FAA office that handles alternative marking 

approval letters. They have been notified of your marking request and will issue the 

alternative marking approval letter during the experimental certification process.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Courtney

Manager, Aircraft and Airport Rules Division
2

Project No.: AIR-14-243-E

Project Officer: _______________

ARM-210:BRobeson:05/29/14:Doc#xxxx

ARM-1/200/210:Program Office AIR

MR. JAMES PETERS

MERRILL AVIATION & DEFENSE

1023 SOUTH WHEELER STREET

SAGINAW, MI 48602
<                                                                Exhibit 32(a)
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Watermark Investors Realty
Trust (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, David S. Givner, Principal Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
         A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its
staff upon request.

 Date:  March 29, 2005                      /s/ David S. Givner
                                            -------------------
                                            David S. Givner
                                            Principal Executive Officer
U.S. Energy Information Administration Quarterly Coal Report, October - December 2023

Table 30. Coal receipts at commercial and institutional users by census division and state

(thousand short tons)

Year to date

Census division

and state

October - December

2023

July - September

2023

October - December

2022 2023 2022

Percent

change

Middle Atlantic s - s 2 2 -18.7

Pennsylvania s - s 2 2 -18.7

East North Central 19 17 26 98 130 -24.8

Illinois 13 16 17 75 75 0.4

Indiana 5 1 9 23 56 -58.8

West North Central 4 1 32 36 129 -72.2

Iowa 1 1 23 17 89 -81.3

Minnesota - - 1 2 6 -71.7

Missouri 1 - 3 3 12 -75.2

North Dakota 2 1 4 15 23 -35.4

South Atlantic 21 9 22 48 44 8.6

North Carolina 18 7 19 34 36 -4.8

Virginia 3 2 3 14 8 68.6

East South Central - - - - s -

Kentucky - - - - s -

Mountain 1 2 4 2 10 -75.6

Colorado s - - s - -

Montana - 2 1 2 1 48.7

Wyoming s - 3 1 9 -92.0

Pacific 124 100 134 473 472 0.2

Alaska 124 100 134 473 472 0.2

U.S. Total 169 129 217 659 788 -16.4

- = No data reported.

s = Absolute percentage less than 0.05 or value is less than 0.5 of the table metric.

Note: Total may not equal sum of components because of independent rounding.

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), Form EIA-3, 'Quarterly Survey of Industrial, Commercial & Institutional Coal Users.'
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         942,269
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       9,099,107
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,535,360
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,379,864
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,535,360
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               351,330
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   99,704
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                257,523
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            257,523
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   257,523
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     8.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### State v. Maitho

108,306

06/21/2016

Denied.

Unpublished