alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title
18, United States Code), the Trustee of Marine Petroleum Trust (the Trust) does hereby certify, to its knowledge, that:

The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2015 (the Form 10-Q) of the Trust fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.



|                                                                                                                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Ron E. Hooper                                                                                                                    
|Ron E. Hooper                                                                                                                        
|Senior Vice President on behalf of Southwest Bank, not in its individual capacity but solely as the Trustee of Marine Petroleum Trust

Dated: February 16, 2016

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Trust and will be retained by the Trust and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuant to
Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the
Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Trust, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
language in such filing.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7595

JUNIOUS LEE RHUE, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

THOMAS R. CARROLL,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,

District Judge. (5:05-hc-00592-BO)

Submitted: January 31, 2007 Decided: June 15, 2007

Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Junious Lee Rhue, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge,

III, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Junious Lee Rhue, Jr., seeks to appeal the district

court’s order and judgment denying as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254

(2000) petition and requests the appointment of counsel on appeal.

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)

(2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude Rhue has not made

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability, deny the motion to appoint counsel and dismiss. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Kaelter v. Sokol

107,401

12/27/13

Granted

Unpublished
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

Ju ly 1 4 , 2017 

# Order

Clerk July 1 4 , 2017

15 5863 ( 6 1 )

JONES FAMILY TRUST,

Plaintiff

- Appellant

, and

SYLVIA JONES and BOBBY JONES,

Plaintiffs

, SC: 15 5863

v COA: 32 9442

Saginaw CC: 13

- 019698

- NZ

SAGINAW COUNTY LAND BANK

AUTHORITY and ROHDE BROTHERS

EXCAVATING, INC

. , Defendant s

- Appellees,

and

CITY OF SAGINAW and HARDHAT DOE,

Defendants

. _________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice , the motion of plaintiff

- appellant to extend the time

for filing its reply is GRANTED. The reply will be accepted as timely filed if submitted

on or before July 31 , 2017

.
No. 12-5253.

#### Walker *v.*Grounds, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 12-6139.

#### Hill *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 22

- 00455

- CR

Byron Keith Sewell v. The State of Texas

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court of Jefferson County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 19

- 33269

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considere d this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed

. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. May 25 , 2023
##### 





---



20-F/A (Amendment No. 1) 2002




---



Exhibit 99.6

In connection with the Amendment No. 1 on
Form 20-F/A of The Shell Transport and Trading
Company, p.l.c., a public limited company organized under the
laws of England (the Company) for the period ending
December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of
the undersigned officers of the Company certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to such
officers knowledge, that:



|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | the Amendment No.1 fully complies, in all
    material respects, with the requirements of Section 13(a)
    or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                    
|  
|2. | the information contained in the
    Amendment No.1 fairly presents, in all material respects,
    the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
    as of, and for, the periods presented in the Amendment No.1.

The foregoing certification is provided solely
for purposes of complying with the provisions of
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not
intended to be used or relied upon for any other purpose.

Dated July 2, 2004



/s/ Malcolm Brinded


--------------------------------------------------------------------


Malcolm Brinded

Managing Director




/s/ Tim Morrison


--------------------------------------------------------------------


Tim Morrison

Acting Chief Financial Officer




E14 Exhibits
# Table 10.24
i i i i i i



### MEM ORA ND UM OP INION No. 04-08-00366- CV IN RE The Honor able Joe Fra zier BROWN , J r. Orig inal Mandamus Proce eding
Opinion by : Alma L . L ópez, Chief J ustice Sitt ing: Alma L . L ópez, Chief J ustice Catherine Stone , J ustice Phy lis J . Speedlin , J ustice Deliver ed and F iled: J uly 14, 2008 PETI TI ON F OR WR I T OF MANDAMUS DI SMI SSED AS MOOT On May 28, 2008, rela tor, the Honora ble J oe F razier B rown, Jr., filed an orig inal petition reque sting a

writ of manda

mus to compel the respondent, the Honorable Boy d L
. Richie, Chairman of the Te x as De mocra tic Ex ecutive Committee, t o d ec l ar e De mocra tic nominee L auro A
. B us ta ma nte , Jr. ine lig ibl e fo r t he of fi c e of jud g e of the 57 th D istri c t Co ur

t, B e x ar Co un ty , T e xas. See T EX . E L EC . C ODE ANN . §§145.003, 161.009, 273.061 (Ve rnon 2003). This cour t determined the petition prese nted a serious question concerning the re lief soug ht and re quested a response . See T EX . R. A PP . P. 52.8(b)( 1).04
- 08
- 00 36 6- CV

- 2- On June 23 , 200 8, re sp on de nt fi le d a motio n to di smi ss r e la tor ’s ma nd a mus pe tit ion a s mo ot. Attache d to the motion is a letter showing responde nt ha s decla red Bustama

nte inelig ible to be the Democr atic nominee f

or the off ice of state district court judg e. We ar e of the opinion respondent’s mot ion to d ism iss sh ou ld be g ra

nte d. Ac c or din g ly , th e mot ion is g ra nte d, a nd the pe tit ion

fo r a wr it of ma nd a mus is d ism iss e d a s mo ot.

Alma L . L ópez, Chief J ustice
# m94_07
S94Y1528.

#### IN THE MATTER OF MARTIN B. FINDLEY.

(453 SE2d 23)

Per curiam.

The Investigative Panel of the State Disciplinary Board of the State Bar of Georgia filed a Notice of Discipline seeking to disbar Martin B. Findley after it found probable cause to believe Findley had violated Standards 3 (engaging in professional conduct involving moral turpitude), 4 (engaging in professional conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or wilful misrepresentation), 44 (wilful abandonment or disregard of client’s legal matter), 45 (knowingly engaging in illegal conduct or conduct contrary to a disciplinary rule), and 68 (failure to respond in accordance with State Disciplinary Board rules) of Bar Rule 4-102 (d).1

The Investigative Panel based its finding of probable cause on the following facts: Tholand International, Inc. retained Findley to represent it in a suit Tholand filed in Henry County Superior Court. Tholand requested that Findley take steps to add the First State Bank of Stockbridge as a defendant in the suit. Findley informed his client that he had filed suit against First State, when he had not. *7Findley also misrepresented to his client that he had obtained a restraining order preventing First State from foreclosing on Tholand’s property, and finally, Findley fabricated an “answer” on behalf of First State. Findley forged the name of another attorney as counsel for First State on the “answer.”

Decided February 13, 1995.

*William P. Smith III, General Counsel State Bar, Bridget B. Bagley, Deputy General Counsel State Bar,*for State Bar of Georgia.

Findley was served with the Notice of Discipline on September 8, 1994. Findley’s notice of rejection of discipline, filed October 5, 1994, was plainly inadequate because he did not make a “written response to the pending grievance” prior to or at the time of filing his notice of rejection as required by Bar Rule 4-208.3 (b). Findley’s amended notice of rejection, in which he admits the essential facts outlined above, attempted to correct this defect, but was untimely. Bar Rule 4-208.3. Findley, therefore, stands in default under Bar Rule 4-208.3 and his amended notice fails to show good cause for opening the default.

After considering the record in this case, including Findley’s admissions, we hereby order that Martin B. Findley is disbarred from the practice of law in Georgia. He is reminded of his duties under Bar Rule 4-219 (c) and is directed to certify to this Court that he has satisfied the requirements of that Rule.

*Disbarred.*

*All the Justices concur.*

1

 Findley has been under an emergency suspension pursuant to Rule 4-108 since February 21, 1994. *In the Matter of Martin B. Findley,*263 Ga. 832 (441 SE2d 410) (1994).
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 4.8

                             SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE
                           COOPER CAMERON CORPORATION
                           COMPENSATION DEFERRAL PLAN

     WHEREAS, COOPER CAMERON CORPORATION (the "Company") has heretofore adopted
the COOPER CAMERON CORPORATION COMPENSATION DEFERRAL PLAN (the "Plan"); and

     WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan in certain respects;

     NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan shall be amended as follows; effective as of
January 1, 1999:

     1. Clause (ii) of the second sentence of Section 3.2 of the Plan shall be
deleted and the following shall be substituted therefor:

     "(ii) on 50% of the Deferred Compensation credited during such calendar
     year pursuant to Section 2.3(a) multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of
     which is the number of days between the date the participant first elects
     to make a deferral pursuant to Section 2.3(a) in such calendar year and the
     end of such calendar year and the denominator of which is 365; and"

     2. As amended hereby, the Plan is specifically ratified and reaffirmed.

     EXECUTED at Houston, Texas this 10th day of February, 2000.

                                               COOPER CAMERON CORPORATION


                                               By: /s/ William C. Lemmer
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Name:  William C. Lemmer
                                                   Title: Vice President
No. 12-5515.

#### Christian *v.*United States District Court for the District of Hawaii.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Cook v. State

110,855

06/29/2015

Denied.

Unpublished
Exhibit 31.02
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Rohm and Haas Company;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of Rohm and Haas as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    Rohm and Haas other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal
control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for Rohm and Haas and have:
     5.
    
    Rohm and Haas other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to Rohm and Haas auditors and the audit committee of Rohm
and Haas board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
    /s/ Jacques M. CroisetiereJacques M. CroisetiereExecutive Vice President, Chief FinancialOfficer and Chief Strategy Officer
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 212 

Expressing the sense of the Senate that any savings under the Medicare 

Program should be invested back into the Medicare Program, rather 

than creating new entitlement programs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 16, 2009 

Mr. JOHANNS submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Finance 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the Senate that any savings under 

the Medicare Program should be invested back into the 

Medicare Program, rather than creating new entitlement 

programs. 

Whereas the Federal Hospital Insurance Trust Fund established under section 1817 of the Social Security Act (42 

U.S.C. 1395i) is projected to be insolvent by 2017; and 

Whereas the Medicaid Program under title XIX of the Social 

Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396 et seq.) is the largest 

source of general revenue spending on health care for 

both the Federal Government and the States: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that— 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 212 IS 

1 (1) any savings under the Medicare Program 

2 under title XVIII of the Social Security Act (42 

3 U.S.C. 1395 et seq.) should be invested back into 

4 the Medicare Program, rather than creating new en5 titlement programs; and 

6 (2) any savings under the Medicaid Program 

7 under title XIX of the Social Security Act (42 

8 U.S.C. 1396 et seq.) should be used to increase the 

9 Federal medical assistance percentage (as defined in 

10 section 1905(b) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1396d(b)). 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
#### Olson v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue

107,153

10/01/13

Denied

Unpublished
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 246 (Thursday, December 23, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 80885-80886]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-32247]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Fifteenth Meeting: EUROCAE WG-72: RTCA Special Committee 216: 
Aeronautical Systems Security (Joint Meeting)

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of EUROCAE WG-72: RTCA Special Committee 216: 
Aeronautical Systems Security (Joint Meeting).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of EUROCAE WG-72: RTCA Special Committee 216: Aeronautical 
Systems Security (Joint Meeting).

DATES: The meeting will be held January 18-21, 2011 starting at 9 a.m. 
to 5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at The Westin Long Beach, 333 East 
Ocean Boulevard, Long Beach, CA. Telephone--(562) 499-2025, Host, 
Boeing Commercial Airplane Group.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, NW., 
Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036; telephone (202) 833-9339; fax (202) 
833-9434; Web site http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice 
is hereby given for a EUROCAE WG-72: RTCA Special Committee 216: 
Aeronautical Systems Security (Joint Meeting) meeting.

Agenda

     Welcome/Introductions/Administrative Remarks.
     Agenda Overview and Approval of the Summary of the 14th 
meeting held October 12-14th, 2010 (RTCA Paper No. 250-10/SC216-031).
     Report on the PMC/ICC action on SC 216 TOR.
     Publication Progress and Update.
     Subgroup and Action Item Reports.
     Plenary review of EUROCAE Council and RTCA PMC actions on 
ED-202 and SC-216 TOR.
     Continuation of Glossary Review.

[[Page 80886]]

     Publication Considerations of Glossary (Update).
     Subgroup Meetings/Breakouts.
     Subgroup Reports on Breakouts.
     Establish Dates, Location and Agenda for Next Meeting(s).
     Any Other Business.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairmen, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on December 16, 2010.
Robert L. Bostiga,
RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 2010-32247 Filed 12-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
<PAGE>

                                                              Exhibit 24.7

                                  POWER OF ATTORNEY


         The undersigned, as a director of Rykoff-Sexton, Inc. (the 
"Company"), does hereby constitute and appoint Mark Van Stekelenburg, 
David F. McAnally and Robert J. Harter, Jr., and each of them, as his true and 
lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and 
resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all 
capacities, to sign the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal 
year ended June 28, 1997 and any and all amendments thereto, and to file the 
same, with exhibits and schedules thereto, and other documents therewith, 
with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said 
attorney-in-fact, full power and authority to do and perform each and every 
act and thing necessary or desirable to be done in and about the premises, as 
fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, thereby 
ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact, or his substitute, 
may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 25th day of 
August, 1997.

                                        /s/ James P. Miscoll              
                                   ------------------------------------
                                            James P. Miscoll
#### Iserhardt v. State

111,269

07/22/2016

Denied.

Unpublished
# Table 2.3

https://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/pet_cons_psup_dc_nus_mbbl_a.htmhttps://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/pet_cons_psup_dc_nus_mbbl_a.htm

# RSE 2.3

https://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/pet_cons_psup_dc_nus_mbbl_a.htmhttps://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/pet_cons_psup_dc_nus_mbbl_a.htm
Order entered October 30, 2012



## jfiftb In The 

## Court of ZippeaW iotritt of Texag at allag )1.2 No. 05-12-00378-CR JEFFREY ALLEN STEELE, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 265th District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F11-00780-R



### ORDER This appeal is REINSTATED. We VACATE our order of October 22, 2012 requiring the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant's brief was not timely filed. We GRANT appellant's October 26, 2012 motion for leave to file appellant's brief. Appellant's brief received by the Clerk of the Court on October 26, 2012 is DEEMED timely filed as of the date of this order. The State's brief shall be due THIRTY DAYS from the date of this order. We GRANT appellant's October 26, 2012 motion to supplement the clerk's record. We ORDER the trial court clerk to file, within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order, a supplemental clerk's record containing copies of (1) the arraignment sheets,LANA MYERS JUSTICE appointments of counsel, and motions to dismiss the prosecution filed in cause numbers F11- 47300-R and F 1 1-47301-R and (2) the trial court's criminal court fee docket sheet in cause number F11-00780-R. We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the following: Dallas County District Clerk Gary Fitzsimmons The Dallas County District Clerk, Criminal Records Division Counsel for all parties.
# Table 10.6

# RSE 10.6

# Microsoft_Word_Document1.docx

# image1.emf

# Microsoft_Word_Document2.docx

# image2.emf