alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 6, 2011 

h0829 

Order 

 

September 6, 2011 

142605 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 142605 

 COA: 297594 

Wayne CC: 05-008891-FC 

CHESTER WILLIAMS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 28, 2010 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
[Exhibit 10.4]


                       Consent of Director


June 24, 2003



Gentlemen:

I hereby consent to the use of my name in the registration of the
securities of Link Plus Corp. (Tax ID. # 52-1018174).

Sincerely,



/s/Frank M. Hardy
2702 Chariton Street
Oakton, VA  22124
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Micronetics, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), David Robbins, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                  |  |        |  |                                      
|----------------- |  | ------ |  | -------------------------------------
|November 13, 2007 |  |        |  | /s/ DAVID ROBBINS                    
|                  |  | Name:  |  | David Robbins                        
|                  |  | Title: |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                  |  |        |  | (Principal Executive Officer)        

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 339 

To express the sense of the Senate in support of permitting the televising 

of Supreme Court proceedings. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 5, 2009 

Mr. SPECTER (for himself, Mr. KAUFMAN, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. FEINGOLD, Mr. 

DURBIN, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, and Mr. SCHUMER) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

To express the sense of the Senate in support of permitting 

the televising of Supreme Court proceedings. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. SENSE OF THE SENATE. 

3 It is the sense of the Senate that the Supreme Court 

4 should permit live television coverage of all open sessions 

5 of the Court unless the Court decides, by a vote of the 

6 majority of justices, that allowing such coverage in a par7 ticular case would constitute a violation of the due process 

8 rights of 1 or more of the parties before the Court. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 24

                               POWER OF ATTORNEY
                               -----------------

                            ROYAL APPLIANCE MFG. CO.
                            ------------------------

     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS; that Royal Appliance Mfg. Co. and each
person whose name is signed below hereby constitute and appoint Michael J.
Merriman and Richard G. Vasek, or both of them, their attorney-in-fact and
agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for and on behalf of
Royal Appliance Mfg. Co. and the undersigned Directors and officers of Royal
Appliance Mfg. Co., to sign Royal Appliance Mfg. Co.'s Annual Report on Form
10-K, any or all amendments thereto, and to file the same, with exhibits thereto
and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, granting such attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to
do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary in
connection with such matters and hereby ratifying and confirming all that such
attorney-in-fact and agent or his substitute or substitutes may do or cause to
be done by virtue hereof.

     This Power of Attorney of Royal Appliance Mfg. Co. and the Directors and
officers of Royal Appliance Mfg. Co. may be executed in multiple counterparts,
each of which shall be deemed an original with respect to the person executing
it.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Power of Attorney has been signed at Cleveland,
Ohio this 13th day of March, 2002.

                                   ROYAL APPLIANCE MFG. CO.


                                   By:   /s/ Richard G. Vasek
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                        Richard G. Vasek, Chief Financial
                                        Officer and Secretary



                                    DIRECTORS

      /s/ Jack Kahl Jr.                      /s/ Michael J. Merriman
     --------------------------------       -----------------------------------
     Jack Kahl Jr.                          Michael J. Merriman


      /s/ E. Patrick Nalley                  /s/ Joseph B. Richey, II
     --------------------------------       -----------------------------------
     E. Patrick Nalley                      Joseph B. Richey, II


      /s/ John P. Rochon                     /s/ R. Louis Scneeberger
     --------------------------------       -----------------------------------
     John P. Rochon                         R. Louis Schneeberger
# C_2019009EN.01000101.xml

| 10.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 9/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 9/1

---

Withdrawal of notification of a concentration

(Case M.8907 — Aperam/VDM)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 9/01)

(Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004)

On 23 October 2018, the European Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Aperam SA (‘Aperam’, Luxembourg), and |
| --- | --- |

—

Aperam SA (‘Aperam’, Luxembourg), and

| — | VDM Metals Holding GmbH (‘VDM’, Germany). |
| --- | --- |

—

VDM Metals Holding GmbH (‘VDM’, Germany).

Aperam acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole VDM.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

On 29 November 2018, the European Commission decided to initiate proceedings under Article 6(1)(c) of the Merger Regulation. On 21 December 2018, the notifying party(ies) informed the Commission that it/they withdrew its/their notification and demonstrated that it/they abandoned the concentration.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

---
# Table 6.2

# RSE 6.2

# Microsoft_Word_Document1.docx

# image1.emf

# Microsoft_Word_Document2.docx

# image2.emf
| | Printing (27)All (20-39)Food (20)Textiles (22)Apparel (23)Lumber (24)Furniture (25)Paper (26)Chemicals (28)Refineries (29)Rubber (30)Stone, Clay & Glass(32)Primary Metals (33)Fabricated Metals (34)Machinery (35)Electronic Equipment (36)Instruments (38)Miscellaneous Manufacturing (39)
    This major group includes establishments engaged in printing by one or more common process
    such as letterpress, lithography (including offset), gravure, or screen; and those
    establishments which perform services for the printing trade, such as bookbinding and
    plate-making.If you found this information useful,
    please try...Energy
        Consumption
      Use of
        Energy
      Electricity
      Manufacturing
        Floorspace
      Prices
      Energy
        Storage
      Energy and
        Operating Ratios
      Energy-Management
        Activities
      Technology
      Fuel-Switching
        Capability
      Motors | Figure on  ratio of energy consumed per 1992 constant dollar for SIC 27***Source: Table 12 of this
    report.***Figure on energy consumed by quadrillion Btu for SIC 27***Sources: Energy Information Administration, 1985, 1988, 1991,
    and 1994 MECS.***
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

arrow to top of pageTop of Pagearrow to previous pageEnergy
Intensity Page



File Last Modified: 8/25/98

Contact:
  robert.adler@eia.doe.gov
  Robert Adler
  MECS Survey Manager
  Phone: (202) 586-1134
  Fax: (202) 586-0018

mark.schipper@eia.doe.gov
  Mark Schipper
  Phone: (202) 586-1136
  Fax: (202) 586-0018

http://www.eia.gov/emeu/mecs/mecs94/ei/**ei_27.html**separater lineIf you are having any technical
problems with this site, please contact the EIA Webmaster at wmaster@eia.doe.gov separater line
#### State v. Pettay

107,673

10/01/13

Granted.

Unpublished
EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of International Automated Systems, Inc.
on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Neldon
Johnson, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The  Report fully complies with the requirements of section  13(a)  or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the Report  fairly  presents,  in  all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the Company.


/s/ Neldon Johnson
___________________________
Neldon Johnson
President and Chief Executive Officer
June 6, 2003






EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of International Automated Systems, Inc.
on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, LaGrand
Johnson, Chief Financial Officer and Director, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The  Report fully complies with the requirements of section  13(a)  or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the Report  fairly  presents,  in  all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the Company.


/s/  LaGrand Johnson
___________________________
LaGrand Johnson
Chief Financial Officer
June 6, 2003
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

IH/Research

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CECILIA CORONA DUARTE,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 07-71327

Agency No. A090-089-593

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 16, 2010** 

Before: SCHROEDER, PREGERSON, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

Cecilia Corona Duarte, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an

immigration judge’s order denying her application for a § 212(c) waiver. Our

FILED

APR 01 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
IH/Research 2 07-71327

jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law,

Saravia-Paguada v. Gonzales, 488 F.3d 1122, 1129 n.10 (9th Cir. 2007), and we

dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review. 

We lack jurisdiction to review Corona Duarte’s contention that there is 

insufficient evidence in the record to establish that she committed an offense that

would render her ineligible for § 212(c) relief under § 440(d) of the Antiterrorism

and Effective Death Penalty Act (“AEDPA”) because Corona Duarte failed to

exhaust this issue before the BIA. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 677 (9th

Cir. 2004). 

Although we have jurisdiction to review Corona Duarte’s contention that the

application of § 440(d) of the AEDPA has an impermissibly retroactive effect in

her case, see Saravia-Paguada, 488 F.3d at 1130, her contention lacks merit

because she was convicted after AEDPA’s effective date, id. at 1132-33 (the past

relevant conduct for the retroactivity analysis is the alien’s decision whether to

enter a guilty plea or to proceed to trial, and not the commission of the underlying

criminal conduct).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 9 (Tuesday, January 14, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 1946]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-817]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Philadelphia Ventures Liberty Fund, L.P. (License No. 03/73-
0208); Notice of Issuance of a Small Business Investment Company 
License

    On July 29, 1994, a ``Track 2'' application was filed by 
Philadelphia Ventures Liberty Fund, L.P. located at 200 Broad Street, 
the Bellevue, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19102, with the Small Business 
Administration (SBA) pursuant to Section 107.102 of the then prevailing 
Regulations governing small business investment companies (13 CFR 
107.102 (1994)) for a license to operate as a small business investment 
company. On June 6, 1996, the application was moved to a ``Track 1'' 
status upon notification of the applicant's first closing.
    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to Section 301(c) of the 
Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended, after considering 
the revised application and all other pertinent information, SBA issued 
License No. 03/73-0208 on December 22, 1996, to Philadelphia Ventures 
Liberty Fund, L.P. to operate as a small business investment company.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 59.011, Small 
Business Investment Companies)
Don A. Christensen,
Associate Administrator for Investment.
[FR Doc. 97-817 Filed 1-13-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 69 (Thursday, April 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17610-17611]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-9285]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-313-000]


Ozark Gas Transmission System; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

April 4, 1997.
    Take notice that on April 1, 1997, Ozark Gas Transmission System 
(Ozark) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets to become effective 
May 2, 1997:

Second Revised Sheet No. 88
Original Sheet No. 88A
Original Sheet No. 117A

    Ozark states that the purpose of this filing, made in accordance 
with the provisions of Section 154.204 of the Commission's Regulations, 
is to establish the flexibility under Ozark's tariff to negotiate rates 
in accordance with the Commission's Statement of Policy on Alternatives 
to Traditional Cost-of-Service Ratemaking for Natural Gas Pipelines, 
Docket No. RM95-6-000 and Regulation of Negotiated Transportation 
Services of Natural Gas Pipelines, Docket No. RM96-7-000 issued January 
31, 1996 (Policy Statement).
    Ozark proposes to establish a negotiated/recourse rate program 
applicable to Ozark's Part 284 firm transportation services under Rate 
Schedules FTS, ITS, and T-1 consistent with the Policy Statement as 
well as Commission pronouncements respecting negotiated rate filings of 
other pipelines.
    Ozark states that copies of this filing are being served on all 
jurisdictional customers and applicable state regulatory agencies.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the

[[Page 17611]]

Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission 
in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve 
to make protestants parties to the proceeding.
    Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-9285 Filed 4-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Schoenholz v. Hinzman

110,388

07/21/2015

Denied. ..

Unpublished
#### State v. Brown

107,614

10/29/13

Denied

Unpublished
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2019154EN.01000501.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 6.5.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 154/5 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9239 — Evonik/Peroxychem)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 154/04)

1.

On 24 April 2019, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2019154EN.01000501-E0001) and following a referral pursuant to Article 4(5) of the Merger Regulation by which Evonik Industries AG (‘Evonik’, Germany), controlled by RAG Stiftung (Germany), acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Peroxychem Holdings L.P. (‘Peroxychem’, USA) by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for Evonik: the production and marketing of specialty chemicals, focusing on products in the areas of nutrition and care, resource efficiency and performance materials,

—   for Peroxychem: the production and supply of hydrogen peroxide, persulfates and peracetic acid, as well as the resale of sulphur derivatives.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9239 — Evonik/Peroxychem

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2019154EN.01000501-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

---
No. 12-5570.

#### Quinones *v.*United States.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.