alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
S95Y0189.

#### IN THE MATTER OF BENJAMIN L. JOHNSON.

(453 SE2d 695)

Per curiam.

The State Bar filed a formal complaint against Respondent, charging him with violations of Standards 4, 23, 44, 45 (b), and 68 of Bar Rule 4-102 (d), arising out of his abandonment of a client in a divorce proceeding and his failure to respond to disciplinary authorities. This Court appointed a special master and after Respondent failed to answer within the time allowed, the special master entered an order making findings of fact and conclusions of law by default. He recommended that the Respondent be suspended for his misconduct.

The review panel of the State Disciplinary Board accepted the special master’s conclusions of law. The review panel examined an affidavit from Respondent’s physician and found that Respondent was suffering from depression when he began representing the client and that he “continues to suffer from severe depression.” The review panel recommended that Respondent be suspended indefinitely with conditions for reinstatement.

The review panel’s finding that Respondent continues to suffer from severe depression is supported by the evidence and is conclusive. *186We agree with the recommendation of the review panel that Respondent be suspended indefinitely from the practice of law and that the suspension shall not be lifted until Respondent: (1) Obtains certification from the Committee on Lawyer Impairment that he does not manifest symptoms of any condition that would mentally or physically impair his competency as an attorney and that he does not pose a substantial threat to himself or others; (2) obtains certification from the Office of General Counsel of the State Bar of Georgia, that based on its review of the State Bar disciplinary records, he has not demonstrated any conduct which would indicate that he poses a danger to his clients or the public by his return to the practice of law; and (3) after he obtains the above described certifications, he may petition the review panel to review the record and certifications, and submit its recommendation to this Court.

Decided February 13, 1995

Reconsideration denied March 17, 1995.

*William P. Smith III, General Counsel State Bar, Paula J. Frederick, Deputy General Counsel State Bar,*for State Bar of Georgia.

*Rees R. Smith,*for Johnson.

It is hereby ordered that Benjamin L. Johnson be suspended from the practice of law in the State of Georgia until the above stated conditions are satisfied and this Court enters an order reinstating him. It is also ordered that he take all action necessary to protect the interests of his clients and complies with all the requirements of Bar Rule 4-219 (c).

*Suspended with conditions.*

*All the Justices concur.*
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 8 (Monday, January 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 1743]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-758]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. CP96-159-005]


Shell Gas Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

January 8, 1997.
    Take notice that on December 19, 1996, Shell Gas Pipeline Company 
(Shell), 200 North Dairy Ashford, Houston, Texas 77079, tendered for 
filing in Docket No. CP96-159-005 as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Original Volume No. 1, the tariff sheets set forth in the Appendix \1\ 
to the filing to become effective October 17, 1996.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Shell's Appendix lists Substitute Original Sheet No. 81, 
Substitute Original Sheet No. 82, Substitute Original Sheet No. 83, 
and Original Sheet No. 83A.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Shell states that the purpose of its filing is to comply with the 
Commission order in Docket No. CP96-159-003 issued November 29, 1996. 
The Commission stated that in the event Shell adds new receipt and/or 
delivery points to its system, Shell must file tariff sheets to be 
consistent with Commission policy. Shell currently offers service to 
two delivery points: Venice Gas Plant and Texas Eastern Transmission 
Corp.; with service as approved to Columbia Gulf Transmission Company 
commencing in the near future. Although no service has been requested 
at any other delivery point than the Venice Gas Plant, Shell states 
that it anticipates such service will be made in the future. 
Specifically, Shell tenders for filing the revised tariff sheets which 
contain the revisions to Section 11.2 of the General Terms and 
Conditions and are listed in the Appendix to the filing, to be made 
effective October 17, 1996, concurrent with the effective date of the 
remainder of Shell's tariff sheets.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with 18 CFR 385.211 or 385.214 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions and protests must be on or before 
January 21, 1997. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make the protestants parties to be proceeding. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene in accordance with the 
Commission's Rules. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-758 Filed 1-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 12-5610.

#### Croneberger *v.*Washington.

Ct. App. Wash. Certiorari denied.
#### State v. Bengston

103,958

09/04/13

Denied

Unpublished
2018 EAVS Data Brief: Maine EAVS Jurisdictions 

499 

 Voter Registration 

Total Registered Voters, 

Nov. 20181 

1,057,967 

1 A1a of EAVS 

Registration Forms Received, 

E-Day 2016 – E-Day 20182 

198,377 

2 A3a of EAVS 

New Voters Registered, 

E-Day 2016 – E-Day 20183 

52,127 

3 A3b of EAVS 

Sources of Registration Forms4 

4 A4a-l of EAVS 

Mail/Fax/Email 12,034 

In-Person 149,382 

Online 0 

Motor Vehicle Office 21,672 

Public Assistance 

Office 0 

Disability Office 0 

Military Recruitment 

Office 0 

Other Non-NVRA 

Office 0 

Registration Drives 6,122 

Other Sources or Not 

Categorized 9,167 

 Voter Turnout 

Voters Participating by Mode5 

By Mail 

183,644 

29% 

Other Mode 

2,441 

0% In-Person E-Day 

459,998 

71% 

5 In-person Election Day 

voters is F1b. By-mail voters 

is F1d+F1g. In-person early 

voters is F1f. Other mode is 

F1c+F1e+F1h. 

Total Turnout:6 646,083 

6 F1a of EAVS 

Provisional Voters:7 0 

7 F1e of EAVS 

UOCAVA Voters:8 2,441 

8 F1c of EAVS 

Election Technology 

Technology Used by Jurisdictions9 

499 

DRE w/o DRE with Ballot Scanner Hand Electronic 

264 235 

0 0 

VVPAT VVPAT Marking Count Poll Book 

Device 

0 



9 F3a-d, F5a-F8a, and 

F11a of EAVS 

Election Policies 

Has online voter registration10 

10 Q6 of Policy Survey 

✔ Has a form of same-day voter registration (SDR)11 

11 Q7 of Policy Survey 

Has all-mail elections statewide12 

Has all-mail elections in certain jurisdictions12 

12 Q9a of Policy Survey 

Allows voters to register as permanent absentee 

voters13 

13 Q10 of Policy Survey Requires excuse for by-mail voting14 

Requires excuse for in-person early or in-person 14 Q8 of Policy Survey 

absentee voting15 15 Q12a of Policy Survey 

Uses vote centers16 16 Q13 of Policy Survey 

Notes 

EAVS data and reports may be downloaded at 

www.eac.gov. 

Responses of “Does not apply” and “Data not available”

are shown as zeroes.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 62 (Tuesday, April 1, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 15561]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-8241]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board


Release of Waybill Data

    The Surface Transportation Board has received a request from 
Oppenheimer Wolff & Donnelly on behalf of Gateway Western Railway 
Company (WB520-3/14/97), for permission to use certain data from the 
Board's Carload Waybill Samples. A copy of the request may be obtained 
from the Office of Economics, Environmental Analysis, and 
Administration.
    The waybill sample contains confidential railroad and shipper data; 
therefore, if any parties object to these requests, they should file 
their objections with the Director of the Board's Office of Economics, 
Environmental Analysis, and Administration within 14 calendar days of 
the date of this notice. The rules for release of waybill data are 
codified at 49 CFR 1244.8.
    Contact: James A. Nash, (202) 565-1542.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-8241 Filed 3-31-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
Order issued November 19, 2012

In The

No. 05-12-00202-CR

FREDERICK NEWKIRK, Appellant

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

ORDER

The Court has before it the State’s November 17, 2012 motion to extend time for filing

the State’s brief and motion to supplement the clerk’s record. We GRANT the State’s motion

and ORDER the brief tendered with the motion filed as of the date of this order.

We GRANT the State’s request to supplement the clerk’s record with defense counsel’s

motion to withdraw and ORDER the Kaufman County Clerk to file the supplemental record on

or before November 26, 2012.
Certificate Of Trust



 EXHIBIT 4.11 
  
 CERTIFICATE OF TRUST 
 OF 
 SMITHFIELD CAPITAL TRUST I 
  
 THIS CERTIFICATE OF TRUST of SMITHFIELD CAPITAL TRUST I (the “Trust”), is being duly executed and filed by
the undersigned, as trustee, to form a statutory trust under the Delaware Statutory Trust Act (12 Del. C. § 3801, et seq.)(the “Act”). 
  
 I. Name. The name of the statutory trust formed hereby is Smithfield Capital Trust I. 
  
 II. Delaware Trustee. The name and business address of the
trustee of the Trust with a principal place of business in the State of Delaware is SunTrust Delaware Trust Company, a Delaware trust company, 1011 Centre Road, Suite 205, Wilmington, Delaware 19805-1266. 
  
 III. Effective Date. This Certificate of Trust shall be
effective upon filing. 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
undersigned trustees of the Trust have executed this Certificate of Trust in accordance with Section 3811(a)(1) of the Act. 
  

	 SUNTRUST DELAWARE TRUST COMPANY,
 not in its individual capacity but solely
 as trustee of the Trust

		
	 By:
	 	  
 /s/    Jack
Ellerin                            


	 	 	 Name:    Jack Ellerin

	 	 	 Title:    Trust Officer

	
	 /s/    Daniel G. Stevens


	 Daniel G. Stevens, not in his individual
 capacity but solely as trustee of the Trust
#### Kingyon v. Roberts

108,698

11/22/13

Denied

Unpublished
Exhibit
32(a)


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350





I,
Mark J. Morrison, the principal executive officer of Hallmark Financial
Services, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify that the accompanying report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, and filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended. I further certify that the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.





Date:  
August 16, 2010





/s/ Mark J. MorrisonMark
      J. Morrison,Principal
      Executive Officer
----

----

The Reserve Petroleum Company 10-K/A

|               |   | RCADKINS, LLC                        |
|--------------------|--------|--------------------------------------|
|               |   |        |
|               |   |                                 |
|               |   |                                 |
|               |   | By:                                  | /s/ Robert C. Adkins |
|               |   |                                 |  Robert C. Adkins, P.E., Member |
|               |   |                                 |   |
| Edmond, Oklahoma   |   |                                 |   |
| September 25, 2012 |   |                                 |   |

----
#### Howard v. State

106,782

08/19/13

Denied.

Unpublished
# Table 10.25

# RSE 10.25

# Microsoft_Word_Document1.docx

# image1.emf

# Microsoft_Word_Document2.docx

# image2.emf
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02 - 16 - 00394 - CV

IN RE STEPHAN HWANG RELATOR

---------- ORIGINAL PROCEEDING TRIAL COURT NO. 15

- 02 287

- 158

---------- 

### DISSENTING MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

---------- I respectfully dissent. Relator alleges that Respondent gave an order in open court for Relator to appear before him on October 24, 2016 , to face a contempt hearing if payment had not been made on the assessed sanctions (attorney’s fees) , and we stayed that proceeding while considering Relator’s petition

. A trial court has no authority to hold a party in contempt for failing to pay

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

attorney’s fees assessed as discovery sanctions. See In re McLa urin , 467 S.W.3d 561, 564

– 66 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] 2015, orig. proceeding) (granting habeas relief when any imprisonment of relator for either civil or criminal contempt for failure to pay a debt

— attorney’s fees assessed as
sanctions

— was void). T herefore, in the interest of conserving judicial resources, I would have requested a response to address the trial court’s contempt authority under the circumstances presented by this case to avoid the necessity of addressing this issue in a subsequent ori ginal proceeding for habeas corpus relief. Because the majority opinion does not, I dissent.

/s/ Bonnie Sudderth BONNIE SUDDERTH JUSTICE
DELIVERED: November 2 2 , 2016
# Table 1.5

# RSE 1.5

# Microsoft_Word_Document1.docx

# image1.emf

# Microsoft_Word_Document2.docx

# image2.emf
#### Stanley Bank v. Parish

106,995

08/19/13

Denied.

Unpublished
#### State v. Currie

111,542

03/28/2016

Denied.

Unpublished
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 68 (Wednesday, April 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17190-17191]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-9071]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-1165-DR]


Indiana; Amendment to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of Indiana (FEMA-1165-DR), dated March 6, 1997, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 31, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3260.


[[Page 17191]]


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident 
period for this disaster is closed effective March 31, 1997.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 83.516, Disaster 
Assistance)
Lacy E. Suiter,
Executive Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 97-9071 Filed 4-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
#### Gant v. State

112,434

07/07/2016

Denied.

Unpublished
# Table 11.5

# RSE 11.5

# Microsoft_Word_Document1.docx

# image1.emf

# Microsoft_Word_Document2.docx

# image2.emf
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 66 (Monday, April 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16561-16562]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-8741]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[I.D. 033197F]


Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council (Council) will 
convene a public meeting of the Reef Fish Advisory Panel (AP).

DATES: The meeting will be held on May 2, 1997, from 8:00 a.m. to 3:00 
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the at the Radisson Bay Harbor 
Inn, 7700 Courtney Campbell Causeway, Tampa, FL 33607; telephone: 813-
281-8000.
    Council address: Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council, 3018 
U.S. Highway 301 North, Suite 1000, Tampa, FL 33619.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steven Atran, Population Dynamics 
Statistician; telephone: 813-228-2815.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Reef Fish AP will review draft Reef Fish 
Amendment 15 which contains: proposals for a red snapper commercial 
license limitation system; limits on harvest of reef fish from 
crustacean traps; a vermilion snapper minimum size limit increase; 
removal of sea bass, grunts, and porgies from Federal management; and 
removal of several reef fish species from the aggregate bag limit rule. 
The Red Snapper AP may also provide recommendations to the Council, and 
the AP will also hear a presentation on marine reserves from NMFS.

Special Accommodations

    This meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Anne Alford at the Council (see ADDRESSES) by 
April 25, 1997.

[[Page 16562]]

    Dated: April 1, 1997.
Richard W. Surdi,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 97-8741 Filed 4-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
#### State v. Dillon

111,530

01/25/2016

Denied.

Unpublished
EXHIBIT 31.1

                              302 CERTIFICATION

I, R.H. Wollenberg, certify that:

     1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Longview Fibre
Company;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and
have:

     (a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
          to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
          period in which this report is being prepared;

     (b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
          the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of
          the end of the period covered by this report based on such
          evaluation; and

     (c)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting that occurred during the
          registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth
          fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
          affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
          registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

      5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

     (a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
          or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     (b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
          other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
          internal control over financial reporting.

R. H. WOLLENBERG	                              June 14, 2004
R. H. WOLLENBERG,
President and Chief Executive Officer
#### State v. Piercy

110,526

12/17/2015

Denied.

Unpublished
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 62 (Tuesday, April 1, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15470-15471]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-8192]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Notice of Public Hearing for the Draft Environmental Impact 
Statement for Disposal and Reuse of the Naval Weapons Industrial 
Reserve Plant, Calverton, NY

SUMMARY: Per Council on Environmental Quality Regulations (40 CFR Parts 
1500-1508), implementing procedural provisions of the National 
Environmental Policy Act, the Department of the Navy has prepared and 
filed, on March 14, 1997, with the U.S. Environmental Protection 
Agency, a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for the disposal 
and subsequent reuse of the Naval Weapons Industrial Reserve Plant 
(NWIRP), Calverton, New York. The DEIS addresses the environmental 
consequences of disposal of NWIRP Calverton, and implementation of the 
proposed Community Reuse Plan for the base prepared by the Calverton 
Air Facility Joint Planning and Redevelopment Commission, an entity 
established by the Riverhead Town Board. The DEIS evaluates 
environmental effects of three reuse alternatives which represent a 
reasonable range of alternative redevelopment intensities for the base 
if the decision is made to dispose of the property.

ADDRESSES: The Department of the Navy will hold a public hearing to 
inform the public of the DEIS findings and to solicit comments. The 
hearing will be held on Thursday, April 17, 1997, beginning at 7:30 
p.m., at the Ramada East End, 1830 Route 25, Riverhead, New York. 
Please call the point of contact below or the Ramada Inn in the case of 
inclement weather.
    Federal, state, local agencies and interested parties are invited 
and urged to attend or be represented at the hearing. Oral statements 
will be heard and transcribed by a stenographer; however, to assure the 
accuracy of the record, all statements should be submitted in writing. 
All statements, both oral and written, will become part of the public 
record on this action and will be given equal consideration.

[[Page 15471]]

    Additional copies of the DEIS have been placed in the Riverhead 
Free Library, 330 Court Street, Riverhead, New York.
    Written comments on the DEIS should be mailed to the address noted 
below and must be postmarked not later than May 9, 1997 to be part of 
the official record.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Additional information concerning this 
notice may be obtained by contacting Mr. Kurt Frederick (Code 202) 
Northern Division, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, 10 Industrial 
Highway, MSC 82, Lester, PA 19113, telephone (610) 595-0728, facsimile 
(610) 595-0778.

    Dated: March 27, 1997.
M.A. Waters,
LCDR, JAGC, USN, Alternate Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-8192 Filed 3-31-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P