alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk September 4, 2012

h0827 

# Order

September 4, 2012

145231

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 145231

COA: 308835

Clinton CC: 93

- 005516

- FC

CHRISTOPHER CARSON SMITH,

Defendant

- Appellant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 24, 2012 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
# File Information

A15- Avg VMT by Veh Type

Std Errors for A15

N Cells for A15

# A15- Avg VMT by Veh Type

# Std Errors for A15

# N Cells for A15
#### State v. Haug

107,031

10/17/13

Denied. ...

Unpublished
| | Stone, Clay & Glass (32)All (20-39)Food (20)Textiles (22)Apparel (23)Lumber (24)Furniture (25)Paper (26)Printing (27)Chemicals (28)Refineries (29)Rubber (30)Primary Metals (33)Fabricated Metals (34)Machinery (35)Electronic Equipment (36)Instruments (38)Miscellaneous Manufacturing (39)
    This major group
    includes establishments manufacturing flat glass and other glass products, cement,
    structural clay products, pottery, concrete and gypsum products, cut stone, abrasive and
    asbestos products,and other products from materials taken principally from the earth in
    the form of stone, clay, and sand.If you found this information useful,
    please try...Energy
        Consumption
      Use of
        Energy
      Electricity
      Manufacturing
        Floorspace
      Prices
      Energy
        Storage
      Energy and
        Operating Ratios
      Energy-Management
        Activities
      Technology
      Fuel-Switching
        Capability
      Motors | Figure on  ratio of energy consumed per 1992 constant dollar for SIC 32***Source: Table 12 of this
    report.***Figure on energy consumed by quadrillion Btu for SIC 32***Sources: Energy Information Administration, 1985, 1988, 1991,
    and 1994 MECS.***
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

arrow to top of pageTop of Pagearrow to previous pageEnergy 
Intensity Page



File Last Modified: 8/25/98

Contact:
  robert.adler@eia.doe.gov
  Robert Adler
  MECS Survey Manager
  Phone: (202) 586-1134
  Fax: (202) 586-0018

mark.schipper@eia.doe.gov
  Mark Schipper
  Phone: (202) 586-1136
  Fax: (202) 586-0018

http://www.eia.gov/emeu/mecs/mecs94/ei/**ei_32.html**separater lineIf you are having any technical
problems with this site, please contact the EIA Webmaster at wmaster@eia.doe.gov separater line
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 24

- 00292

- CV

In re Phillip “ Baby Shark ” Scott

OR I GINAL PROCEEDING FROM COMAL COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Relator Phillip “Baby Shark ” Scott has filed a n original application for writ of habeas corpus complaining that the trial court allegedly held an ex parte co mpetency hearing as part of Relator ’s underlying criminal proceeding

. See Tex. Code Crim. Pro. art. 46B.005 ( “Determining Incompetence to Stand Trial ”). 1 “The Texas C onstitution grants courts of appeals original jurisdiction only where speci fically prescribed by law.” Ex parte Braswell , 630 S.W.3d 600, 601 (Tex. App.

— Waco 2021, no pet.) . T his Court does not have original habeas corpus jurisdiction in criminal cases. See Tex. Const. art. V, § 6; Tex. Gov ’ t Code § 22.221(d) (limiting original habeas corpus jurisdiction of courts of appeals to certai n orders, processes, or
commitments arising in civil cases) ; see also Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.05 (vesting “power to issue the writ of habeas corpus” to Court of Criminal Appeals, district courts, and county courts and their judges )

. As an intermediate appellate court, our habeas corpus jurisdiction in

1 Relator separately filed a petition for writ of mandamus based on substantially similar grounds. In re Scott , No. 03

- 24

- 0015 7

- CV, 2024 WL 1098217, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Austin Mar. 14, 2024 , ori g. proceeding )

.2 criminal matters is appellate only. See Tex. Gov ’ t Code § 22.221(d ) ; see also In re Wilkins , No. 03

- 20

- 00381

- CV, 2020 WL 5608486, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Austin Se pt. 17, 2020, orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we dismiss Relator ’ s application for want of jurisdiction. See
Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

____________ ___________________ _

__________ Darlene Byrne , Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Smith and T h eofanis
Filed: May 10, 2024
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 439 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 439

Recognizing the exemplarily service, devotion to country, and selfless 
  sacrifice of Special Warfare Operators 2nd Class Matthew McCabe and 
Jonathan Keefe and Special Warfare Operator 1st Class Julio Huertas in 
capturing Ahmed Hashim Abed, one of the most-wanted terrorists in Iraq, 
and pledging to continue to support members of the United States Armed 
                     Forces serving in harm's way.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 4, 2010

 Mr. Ensign submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Recognizing the exemplarily service, devotion to country, and selfless 
  sacrifice of Special Warfare Operators 2nd Class Matthew McCabe and 
Jonathan Keefe and Special Warfare Operator 1st Class Julio Huertas in 
capturing Ahmed Hashim Abed, one of the most-wanted terrorists in Iraq, 
and pledging to continue to support members of the United States Armed 
                     Forces serving in harm's way.

Whereas in September 2009, Special Warfare Operators 2nd Class Matthew McCabe 
        and Jonathan Keefe and Special Warfare Operator 1st Class Julio Huertas 
        successfully captured Ahmed Hashim Abed, one of the most-wanted 
        terrorists in Iraq;
Whereas Ahmed Hashim Abed is the alleged planner of the March 21, 2004, ambush 
        of a supply convoy in Fallujah, Iraq, which resulted in the brutal 
        killing of 4 Blackwater security contractors;
Whereas Ahmed Hashim Abed evaded capture in Iraq for more than 5 years until his 
        capture by the 3 Navy SEALs;
Whereas Special Warfare Operators 2nd Class Matthew McCabe and Jonathan Keefe 
        and Special Warfare Operator 1st Class Julio Huertas are exceptional 
        sailors who accomplished their mission in the finest tradition of the 
        Navy SEALs and the United States Armed Forces while defending their 
        country and protecting the citizens of Iraq;
Whereas the capture of Ahmed Hashim Abed serves as an important reminder that 
        the United States is still engaged in a Global War on Terror; and
Whereas it is because of the efforts of these courageous Navy SEALs and other 
        members of the Armed Forces that Americans continue to be free: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) recognizes the exemplarily service, devotion to 
        country, and selfless sacrifice of Special Warfare Operators 
        2nd Class Matthew McCabe and Jonathan Keefe and Special Warfare 
        Operator 1st Class Julio Huertas; and
            (2) pledges to continue to support members of the United 
        States Armed Forces serving in harm's way.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1



Exhibit 11
----------

                    ROYAL APPLIANCE MFG. CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                                    FORM 10-K
                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

                       For Years Ended December 31, 1996,
                                1995, and 1994
                   (in thousands, except per share amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              1996                 1995                    1994
                                                             ------               ------                  -----
<S>                                                       <C>                   <C>                  <C>
Net income (loss) applicable to share                       $ 9,436              $(13,756)               $ 1,962(A)
                                                            =======              ========                =======

Primary:
   Weighted average common shares
       outstanding for the period                            24,030                23,999                 23,999

   Dilutive stock options - based on
       the treasury stock method using average
       market price                                             183                    --                     12
                                                            -------              --------                -------   

Totals                                                       24,213                23,999                 24,011
                                                            =======              ========                =======



Fully diluted:
   Weighted average common shares
       outstanding for the period                            24,030                23,999                 23,999


   Dilutive stock options - based on the treasury stock method
       using the year-end market price if higher than the
       average market price                                     242                    --                     12
                                                            -------               -------                -------

Totals                                                       24,272                23,999                 24,011
                                                            =======               =======                =======


Earnings (loss) per common and common equivalent share:

   Primary                                                  $   .39               $  (.57)               $   .08

   Fully diluted (B)                                        $   .39               $  (.57)               $   .08
</TABLE>

(A)     Amount has been restated to reflect a change in the valuation method of
        accounting for inventory from the LIFO method to the FIFO method.

(B)     This calculation is submitted in accordance with Regulations S-K Item
        601(b)(11) although not required for statement of income presentation
        because it results in dilution of less than 3 percent.
#### State v. Connally

107,052

01/29/14

Denied. ...

Unpublished
# Btu

# rse
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 9 (Tuesday, January 14, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 1875]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-871]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[I.D. 010697A]


Marine Mammals; Scientific Research Permit No. 1024 (P772#69)

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Issuance of permit.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Southwest Fisheries Science 
Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, 8604 La Jolla Shores Drive, 
La Jolla, CA 92038 [Principal Investigators: Dr. Rennie S. Holt, or his 
designee(s)] has been issued a permit to take Antarctic pinnipeds for 
purposes of scientific research.

ADDRESSES: The permit and related documents are available for review 
upon written request or by appointment in the following office(s):
    Permits Division, Office of Protected Resources, NMFS, 1315 East-
West Highway, Room 13130, Silver Spring, MD 20910 (301/713-2289); and
    Regional Administrator, Southwest Region, NMFS, 501 West Ocean 
Blvd., Long Beach, CA 90802-4213 (310/980-4001).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On November 18, 1996, notice was published 
in the Federal Register (61 FR 58677) that a request for a scientific 
research permit to take Antarctic pinnipeds had been submitted by the 
above-named organization. The requested permit has been issued under 
the authority of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972, as amended 
(16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.), and the Regulations Governing the Taking and 
Importing of Marine Mammals (50 CFR part 216).

    Dated: December 30, 1996.
Ann D. Terbush,
Chief, Permits and Documentation Division, Office of Protected 
Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 97-871 Filed 1-13-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
No. 12-5462.

#### Turnpaugh *v.*Michigan.

Ct. App. Mich. Cer-tiorari denied.
#### Edgar v. State

110,551

09/14/2015

Denied.

Unpubhshed
Exhibit 10.21



FIRST AMENDMENT OF PURCHASE

AND SALE AGREEMENT



First
Amendment of Purchase and Sale Agreement (this Amendment), made and entered into this I7thday of
February, 2006, by and between General America Corporation, a Washington corporation (Seller) and Microsoft Corporation, a Washington corporation (Purchaser).



RECITALS



A. Seller and Purchaser are the parties to that certain Purchase and Sale Agreement and Joint Escrow Instructions effective as of January 13, 2006 (the
Agreement).



B. The parties desire to extend the Inspection
Period as defined in the Agreement.



AGREEMENTS



1. Extension of Inspection Period. The first sentence of Section
5.1 (a) of the Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the words the date that is thirty (30) days after the Effective Date and substituting the words February 17th, 2006.



2. No Other Amendments. Except as expressly amended by this Amendment, the Agreement remains unmodified and in full force and effect.



SELLER:GENERAL AMERICA CORPORATION, a Washington corporationBy

/s/ Stephanie Daley-WatsonIts

Vice President & SecretaryPURCHASER:MICROSOFT CORPORATION, a Washington
corporationBy

/s/ James AblesonIts

Director, Real Estate & Facilities
# C_2021023EN.01020901.xml

| 21.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 23/209 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 23/209

---

P8_TA(2019)0144

Protocol amending the EU-China Agreement on Maritime Transport (accession of Croatia) ***

European Parliament legislative resolution of 12 March 2019 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union and of the Member States, of the Protocol amending the Agreement on maritime transport between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the government of the People's Republic of China, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union (05083/2015 — C8-0022/2019 — 2014/0327(NLE))

(Consent)

(2021/C 23/36)

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (05083/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (05083/2015),

| — | having regard to the draft Protocol amending the Agreement on Maritime Transport between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Government of the People's Republic of China, of the other part (05880/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Protocol amending the Agreement on Maritime Transport between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Government of the People's Republic of China, of the other part (05880/2015),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 100(2) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0022/2019), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 100(2) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0022/2019),

| — | having regard to Rule 99(1) and (4) and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 99(1) and (4) and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Transport and Tourism (A8-0168/2019), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Transport and Tourism (A8-0168/2019),

| 1. | Gives its consent to conclusion of the Protocol; |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the People's Republic of China. |
| --- | --- |

2.

---
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 358 

Designating December 12, 2009, as ‘‘Wreaths Across America Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 20, 2009 

Ms. COLLINS (for herself and Ms. SNOWE) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Designating December 12, 2009, as ‘‘Wreaths Across 

America Day’’. 

Whereas 18 years ago, the Wreaths Across America project 

began an annual tradition, during the month of December, of donating, transporting, and placing Maine balsam 

fir holiday wreaths on the graves of the fallen heroes buried at Arlington National Cemetery; 

Whereas since that tradition began, through the hard work 

and generosity of the individuals involved in the Wreaths 

Across America project, hundreds of thousands of 

wreaths have been sent to national cemeteries and veterans memorials in every State and to locations overseas; 

Whereas in 2008, wreaths were sent to 372 locations across 

the United States, as well as 24 sites overseas; 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 358 IS 

Whereas in December 2009, the Patriot Guard Riders, a motorcycle and motor vehicle group that is dedicated to patriotic events and includes more than 177,000 members 

nationwide, will continue their tradition of escorting a 

tractor-trailer filled with donated wreaths from Harrington, Maine, to Arlington National Cemetery; 

Whereas thousands of individuals volunteer each December to 

escort and lay the wreaths; 

Whereas, December 13, 2008, was previously designated by 

the Senate as ‘‘Wreaths Across America Day’’; and 

Whereas the Wreaths Across America project will continue its 

proud legacy on December 12, 2009, bringing 15,000 

wreaths to Arlington National Cemetery on that day: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates December 12, 2009, as ‘‘Wreaths 

3 Across America Day’’; 

4 (2) honors the Wreaths Across America project, 

5 the Patriot Guard Riders, and all of the volunteers 

6 and donors involved in this worthy tradition; and 

7 (3) recognizes the sacrifices our veterans, 

8 servicemembers, and their families have made, and 

9 continue to make, for our great Nation. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 460 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 460

  Recognizing the importance of the Long Trail and the Green Mountain 
            Club on the 100th anniversary of the Long Trail.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 17, 2010

    Mr. Leahy (for himself and Mr. Sanders) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Recognizing the importance of the Long Trail and the Green Mountain 
            Club on the 100th anniversary of the Long Trail.

Whereas the Long Trail is the oldest long-distance hiking trail in the United 
        States;
Whereas the Long Trail stretches over 273 miles, from the Massachusetts to 
        Canadian borders, with approximately 175 miles of side trails and more 
        than 65 shelters;
Whereas the Long Trail has achieved the dream of founder James Taylor of 
        creating ``a high highway, a mountain footpath over the skyline of 
        Vermont'';
Whereas the Green Mountain Club is the founder, sponsor, defender, and protector 
        of the Long Trail;
Whereas the Green Mountain Club has delivered 100 years of conservation, 
        community education, and outreach on local ecology;
Whereas the Long Trail has protected the habitat of many important species for 
        future generations, including the black bear, the moose, the bobcat, and 
        migratory songbirds;
Whereas the thousands of members and dedicated volunteers of the Green Mountain 
        Club have worked to maintain, manage, and protect the Long Trail for the 
        benefit of the people of the State of Vermont during the last century;
Whereas the Long Trail is a popular tourist destination for people from around 
        the world, including Senators, a Secretary of Agriculture, and even a 
        President;
Whereas the Long Trail allows the people of the State of Vermont and tourists to 
        enjoy the Green Mountain State and all the beauty and history the State 
        has to offer;
Whereas the Green Mountain Club has successfully conserved the entire corridor 
        of the Long Trail, fought efforts to build highways or commercial 
        developments that intersect with the Long Trail, and helped to maintain 
        pristine Vermont forestland for future generations to enjoy; and
Whereas the Green Mountain Club has recognized members regardless of sex or race 
        since the founding of the club: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate recognizes the 100th anniversary of the 
Long Trail of the State of Vermont, the oldest long-distance hiking 
trail in the United States, and applauds the Green Mountain Club and 
the many volunteers of the Green Mountain Club for a century of service 
and for creating, protecting, and enjoying the Long Trail.
                                 <all>
```
No. 12-6079.

#### Fuentes *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.