Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 72 / Tuesday, April 15, 1997 / Notices 18383

its consultant were necessary for the

preparation of a PFC application. The

approved amount was limited to the

amount invoiced by the public agency’s

consultant for preparation of the PFC

application.

Decision Date: March 24, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: D.

Cameron Bryan, Atlanta Airports

District Office, (404) 305–7144.

Public Agency: Spokane Airport

Board, Spokane, Washington.

Application Number: 97–03–C–00–

GEG.

Application Type: Impose and use a

PFC.

PFC Level: $3.00.

Total Net PFC Revenue Approved in

This Decision: $17,606,000.

Estimated Charge Effective Date: May

1, 2000.

Estimated Charge Expiration Date:

June 1, 2005.

Class of Air Carriers Not Required To

Collect PFC’S: None.

Brief Description of Projects Approved

for Collection and Use: Master plan

update, Airport terminal signage, Fire

life safety system, Taxiways D and H,

Taxiway J relocation, Multiple use

apron rehabilitation (identified as apron

G), Multiple use apron construction,

Regional terminal concourse expansion

and associated apron, Terminal

ticketing/baggage expansion.

Decision Date: March 24, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mary Vargas, Seattle Airports District

Office, (206) 227–2660.

Amendments To PFC Approvals

Amendment No., city, state Amendment

approved date

Original approved net

PFC revenue

Amended approved net

PFC revenue

Original estimated charge

exp. date

Amended estimated charge

exp. date

92–01–C–03–BNA, ............................................................... 07/01/96 $75,480,900 $87,729,800 10/01/99 01/01/02

Nashville, Tennessee

92–01–C–03–CLE, ............................................................... 03/25/96 38,343,640 37,343,640 02/01/97 02/01/97

Cleveland, Ohio

93–01–C–01–MOT, .............................................................. 06/19/96 1,569,483 646,047 11/01/98 04/01/97

Minot, North Dakota

95–03–C–01–CLE, ............................................................... 08/27/96 19,475,642 21,500,642 02/01/97 08/01/97

Cleveland, Ohio

92–01–C–02–MHT, ............................................................... 12/18/96 5,702,523, 5,679,523 09/01/97 09/01/97

Manchester, New Hampshire

93–01–C–03–RHI, ................................................................ 01/21/97 188,951 183,301 10/01/00 10/01/00

Rhinelander, Wisconsin

Issued in Washington, D.C. on April 10,

1997.

Kendall Ball,

Acting Manager, Passenger Facility Charge

Branch.

[FR Doc. 97–9638 Filed 4–14–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Highway Administration

Environmental Impact Statement: City

of Ogden, Weber County, UT

AGENCY: Federal Highway

Administration (FHWA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of intent.

SUMMARY: The FHWA is issuing this

notice to advise the public that an

environmental impact statement will be

prepared for a proposed highway project

in the City of Ogden, Weber County,

Utah.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Thomas Allen, Project Development

Engineer, Federal Highway

Administration, 2520 West 4700 South,

Suite 9A, Salt Lake City, Utah 84118,

Telephone: (801) 963–0182; or Rod

Terry, Preconstruction Engineer, Utah

Department of Transportation, Region 1,

P.O. Box 12580, Ogden, Utah 84412,

Telephone (801) 399–5921 ext. 305.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The

FHWA, in cooperation with the Utah

Department of Transportation, will

prepare an environmental impact

statement on a proposal to reconstruct

approximately 2 miles of State Road

(SR) 79 from the existing Interstate 15

interchange to Harrison Boulevard (SR–

203), and to widen approximately 1.5

miles on Wall Avenue (SR–204) from

approximately 22nd Street to 34th Street

in the urban portion of Ogden, Utah.

The proposed reconstruction of SR–79

would provide the necessary east-west

arterial roadway capacity to meet urban

infrastructure needs, and to meet

existing and future transportation

demand. The widening of SR–204

would provide a uniform roadway

width for the north-south arterial

roadway and an appropriate roadway

capacity for the gateway entrance to the

Central Business District of the City of

Ogden.

The reconstruction of SR–79 is

included in the current Long-Range Plan

and the Transportation Improvement

Plan for the Ogden Urbanized Area. The

City of Ogden has stated the need for

infrastructure improvements to facilitate

access to the Central Business District.

The proposed action would eliminate

the current one-way couplet structure of

SR–79 through the City of Ogden and

replace it with a single arterial roadway

of sufficient capacity to accommodate

predicted traffic demand through the

year 2020. The widening of SR–204

would provide continuity with the

existing width on SR–204 both north

and south of the proposed project, and

would improve capacity of key

instructions. It would also provide a

proper shoulder and new curb and

gutter along the roadway improving

safety, maintenance, drainage, and

access control.

Alternatives under consideration

include: (1) Taking no action, (2) using

transportation system management

strategies that would provide for

transportation efficiency within the

existing transportation network, and (3)

constructing a new arterial roadway on

one or the several alignments for SR–79.

Such a new arterial would widen

existing roadways to the maximum

extent possible, but would also require

new right-of-way segments of the

alignments. Design variations of grade
18384 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 72 / Tuesday, April 15, 1997 / Notices

and alignment will be incorporated into,

and analyzed with, the various build

alternatives. SR–204 would be widened

on one or both sides of the existing

alignment.

Information letters describing the

proposed action and soliciting

comments on the proposed project will

be sent to appropriate Federal, State and

local agencies, as well as to private

organizations and individuals who have

previously expressed interest, or who

are expected to be interested, in the

proposed project. An initial public

scoping meeting is expected to be held

in the City of Ogden during May 1997.

Notice of additional public meetings to

present information and solicit

comments relative to alternatives for

consideration and possible impacts will

be given as the proposed project

proceeds. In addition, a public hearing

will be held. Upon release of the draft

EIS, public notice will be given of the

time and place for a public hearing. The

draft EIS will be available for public and

agency review and comment prior to the

public hearing.

To ensure that the full range of issues

related to this proposed action are

addressed and all significant issues are

identified, comments and suggestions

are invited from all interested parties.

Comments or questions concerning this

proposed action and the EIS should be

directed to the FHWA or UDOT at the

address provided above.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance

Program Number 20.205, Highway Research,

Planning and Construction. The regulations

impending Executive Order 12372 regarding

intergovernmental consultation on Federal

programs and activities apply to this

program.)

Issued on: April 9, 1997.

Michael G. Ritchie,

Division Administrator, Salt Lake City, Utah.

[FR Doc. 97–9624 Filed 4–14–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–22–M

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety

Administration

[Docket Nos. 96–126, Notice 2; 96–131,

Notice 2; 96–132, Notice 2; 97–003, Notice

2; 97–005, Notice 2; 97–006, Notice 2; 97–

007, Notice 2; 97–008, Notice 2; 97–009,

Notice 2; 97–010, Notice 2; 97–011, Notice

2; and 97–012, Notice 2]

Decision That Certain Nonconforming

Motor Vehicles Are Eligible for

Importation

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic

Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of decision by NHTSA

that certain nonconforming motor

vehicles are eligible for importation.

SUMMARY: This notice announces the

decision by NHTSA that certain motor

vehicles not originally manufactured to

comply with all applicable Federal

motor vehicle safety standards are

eligible for importation into the United

States because they are substantially

similar to vehicles originally

manufactured for importation into and/

or sale in the United States and certified

by their manufacturers as complying

with the safety standards, and they are

capable of being readily altered to

conform to the standards.

DATES: This decision is effective April

15, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

George Entwistle, Office of Vehicle

Safety Compliance, NHTSA (202–366–

5306).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

Under 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A), a

motor vehicle that was not originally

manufactured to conform to all

applicable Federal motor vehicle safety

standards shall be refused admission

into the United States unless NHTSA

has decided that the motor vehicle is

substantially similar to a motor vehicle

originally manufactured for importation

into and sale in the United States,

certified under 49 U.S.C. 30115, and of

the same model year as the model of the

motor vehicle to be compared, and is

capable of being readily altered to

conform to all applicable Federal motor

vehicle safety standards.

Petitions for eligibility decisions may

be submitted by either manufacturers or

importers who have registered with

NHTSA pursuant to 49 CFR part 592. As

specified in 49 CFR 593.7, NHTSA

publishes notice in the Federal Register

of each petition that it receives, and

affords interested persons an

opportunity to comment on the petition.

At the close of the comment period,

NHTSA decides, on the basis of the

petition and any comments that it has

received, whether the vehicle is eligible

for importation. The agency then

publishes this decision in the Federal

Register.

NHTSA received petitions from

registered importers to decide whether

the vehicles listed in Annex A to this

notice are eligible for importation into

the United States. To afford an

opportunity for public comment,

NHTSA published notice of these

petitions as specified in Annex A. The

reader is referred to those notices for a

thorough description of the petitions.

No comments were received in response

to these notices. Based on its review of

the information submitted by the

petitioners, NHTSA has decided to grant

the petitions.

Vehicle Eligibility Number for Subject

Vehicles

The importer of a vehicle admissible

under any final decision must indicate

on the form HS–7 accompanying entry

the appropriate vehicle eligibility

number indicating that the vehicle is

eligible for entry. Vehicle eligibility

numbers assigned to vehicles admissible

under this decision are specified in

Annex A.

Final Decision

Accordingly, on the basis of the

foregoing, NHTSA hereby decides that

each motor vehicle listed in Annex A to

this notice, which was not originally

manufactured to comply with all

applicable Federal motor vehicle safety

standards, is substantially similar to a

motor vehicle manufactured for

importation into and/or sale in the

United States, and certified under 49

U.S.C. 30115, as specified in Annex A,

and is capable of being readily altered

to conform to all applicable Federal

motor vehicle safety standards.

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A) and

(b)(1); 49 CFR 593.8; delegations of authority

at 49 CFR 1.50 and 501.8.

Issued on: April 10, 1997.

Marilynne Jacobs,

Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.

Annex A—Nonconforming Motor Vehicles

Decided To Be Eligible for Importation

1. Docket No. 96–126

Nonconforming Vehicle: 1986 Mazda RX–

7

Substantially similar U.S.-certified vehicle:

1986 Mazda RX–7

Notice of Petition published at: 62 FR 1143

(January 8, 1997)

Vehicle Eligibility Number: VSP–199

2. Docket No. 96–131

Nonconforming Vehicles: 1992 through

1996 BMW 325i

Substantially similar U.S.-certified

vehicles: 1992 through 1996 BMW 325i

Notice of Petition published at: 62 FR 1145

(January 8, 1997)

Vehicle Eligibility Number: VSP–197

3. Docket No. 96–132

Nonconforming Vehicle: 1984 Nissan

300ZX

Substantially similar U.S.-certified vehicle:

1984 Nissan 300ZX

Notice of Petition published at: 62 FR 1144

(January 8, 1997)

Vehicle Eligibility Number: VSP–198

4. Docket No. 97–003

Nonconforming Vehicles: 1987 and 1988

Toyota Vans

Substantially similar U.S.-certified

vehicles: 1987 and 1988 Toyota Vans