alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
        32.2
  CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
  In
        connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of International Automated Systems,
        Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB/A for the fiscal period ending March 31,
        2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
        (the “Report”), I, LaGrand T. Johnson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
        certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
        906
        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
        belief:
  (1)
              the
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
 
 (2)
              the
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                  Company.
 
 
 /s/
        LaGrand T.
        Johnson
 
 LaGrand
        T. Johnson
 Chief
        Financial Officer
 
 June
        26,
        2006
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 457 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 457

    To provide for issuance of a summons and for related procedures 
 concerning the articles of impeachment against G. Thomas Porteous, Jr.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 17, 2010

   Mr. Reid (for himself and Mr. McConnell) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    To provide for issuance of a summons and for related procedures 
 concerning the articles of impeachment against G. Thomas Porteous, Jr.

    Resolved, That a summons shall be issued which commands G. Thomas 
Porteous, Jr. to file with the Secretary of the Senate an answer to the 
articles of impeachment no later than April 7, 2010, and thereafter to 
abide by, obey, and perform such orders, directions, and judgments as 
the Senate shall make in the premises, according to the Constitution 
and laws of the United States.
    Sec. 2.  The Sergeant at Arms is authorized to utilize the services 
of the Deputy Sergeant at Arms or another employee of the Senate in 
serving the summons.
    Sec. 3.  The Secretary shall notify the House of Representatives of 
the filing of the answer and shall provide a copy of the answer to the 
House.
    Sec. 4.  The Managers on the part of the House may file with the 
Secretary of the Senate a replication no later than April 21, 2010.
    Sec. 5.  The Secretary shall notify counsel for G. Thomas Porteous, 
Jr. of the filing of a replication, and shall provide counsel with a 
copy.
    Sec. 6.  The Secretary shall provide the answer and the 
replication, if any, to the Presiding Officer of the Senate on the 
first day the Senate is in session after the Secretary receives them, 
and the Presiding Officer shall cause the answer and replication, if 
any, to be printed in the Senate Journal and in the Congressional 
Record. If a timely answer has not been filed, the Presiding Officer 
shall cause a plea of not guilty to be entered.
    Sec. 7.  The articles of impeachment, the answer, and the 
replication, if any, together with the provisions of the Constitution 
on impeachment, and the Rules of Procedure and Practice in the Senate 
When Sitting on Impeachment Trials, shall be printed under the 
direction of the Secretary as a Senate document.
    Sec. 8.  The provisions of this resolution shall govern 
notwithstanding any provisions to the contrary in the Rules of 
Procedure and Practice in the Senate When Sitting on Impeachment 
Trials.
    Sec. 9.  The Secretary shall notify the House of Representatives of 
this resolution.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-40263 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee

v. ARNOLDO GERMAN Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:06-CR-814-1
Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Arnol do German appeals from his guilty plea conviction for possession with intent to distribute a quantity exceeding five kilograms of cocaine. He argues on appeal that (1) the appeal-waiver provision in his written plea agreement was invalid and (2) the imposed sentence was unreasonable. The Government seeks enforcement of the appeal-waiver provision. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D June 19, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-40263

2 This court reviews de novo whether a waiver provision bars an appeal. United States v. Baymon, 312 F.3d 725, 727 (5th Cir. 2002). The record shows that German was aware ofhis right to appeal and that he waswaiving that right by pleading guilty pursuant to his written plea agreement. Moreover, the district court c

omplied with the requirements of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(b)(1)(N). Accordingly, his plea agreement was valid and will be enforced. See United States v. McKinney, 406 F.3d 744, 746 n.2, 747 (5th Cir. 2005). German’s remaining argument is barred by the appeal-waiver provision. Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
Independent Auditors' Consent - Deloitte & Touche



 Exhibit 10.1 
  
 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT 
  
 We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 33-52722 and No. 33-92818 of Tomkins plc on Form
S-8 of our report dated March 4, 2003, except for Note 27, as to which the date is June 20, 2003 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs relating to the differences between accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America and the effect that the application of the latter would have on the determination of shareholders’ equity), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Tomkins plc and its subsidiaries for the eight
months ended December 31, 2002. 
  

	 /s/    DELOITTE &
TOUCHE        


	 Deloitte & Touche
 London, England


  
 Date:  June 20, 2003
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-18-00473-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF B.W.C., a Child

From the County Court, Jim Wells County, Texas

Trial Court No. 11-06-50160-CV

Honorable David A. Sanchez, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE ALVAREZ, AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the order of the trial court is 

AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that the appellee recover her costs of this appeal from appellant.

SIGNED January 30, 2019.

_____________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 10 (Wednesday, January 15, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 2068]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-894]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
26 CFR Parts 1 and 301

[REG-209803-95]
RIN 1545-AU18


Magnetic Media Filing Requirements for Information Returns; 
Hearing

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service, Treasury.

ACTION: Change of location of public hearing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document changes the location of the public hearing on 
proposed regulations relating to the requirements for filing 
information returns on magnetic media or in other machine-readable form 
under section 6011(e) of the Internal Revenue Code.

DATES: The public hearing is being held on Wednesday, February 5, 1997, 
beginning at 10:00 a.m.

ADDRESSES: The public hearing originally scheduled in the IRS 
Commissioner's Conference Room, room 3313, Internal Revenue Building, 
1111 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC. is changed to room 2615, 
Internal Revenue Building, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, 
DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mike Slaughter of the Regulations 
Unit, Assistant Chief Counsel (Corporate), (202) 622-7190 (not a toll-
free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A notice of proposed rulemaking and notice 
of public hearing appearing in the Federal Register on Thursday, 
October 10, 1996 (61 FR 53161), announced that a public hearing 
relating to proposed regulations under sections 6011(e) and 6045 of the 
Internal Revenue Code will be held Wednesday, February 5, 1997, 
beginning at 10:00 a.m. in the IRS Commissioner's Conference Room, room 
3313, Internal Revenue Building, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW, 
Washington, DC and that requests to speak and outlines of oral comments 
should be received by Wednesday, January 15, 1997.
    The location of the public hearing has changed. The hearing is 
being held in room 2615 on Wednesday, February 5, 1997, beginning at 
10:00 a.m. The requests to speak and outlines of oral comments should 
be received by Wednesday, January 15, 1997. Because of controlled 
access restrictions, attenders cannot be admitted beyond the lobby of 
the Internal Revenue Building until 9:45 a.m.
    Copies of the agenda are available free of charge at the hearing.
Cynthia E. Grigsby,
Chief, Regulations Unit, Assistant Chief Counsel (Corporate).
[FR Doc. 97-894 Filed 1-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-U
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10.25

                                   TERM NOTE


March 29, 1996


For value received, TIMOTHY J. SULLIVAN promises to pay on April 1, 2000 to the
order of Market Facts, Inc., 3040 Salt Creek Lane, Arlington Heights, Illinois,
60005, or at any such other place as the payee or legal holder hereof may in
writing appoint, the sum of SIXTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($60,000.00) together with
interest.

Interest will be billed to the undersigned annually for the period of March 1
through February 28 ("Interest Rate Year") and will be calculated based upon the
balance of the Note outstanding on the first day of the Interest Rate Year.  The
rate of interest will be 8.25%.

The undersigned agrees to surrender to Market Facts, Inc. 12,000 shares of
Market Facts common stock to be held as collateral for this Note until such time
as the unpaid balance of principal and interest are paid in full.

The undersigned hereby authorizes, irrevocably, any attorney of any Court of
Record to appear for TIMOTHY J. SULLIVAN in such Court if this Note is not paid
when due, and at any time thereafter to confess judgment, without due process,
in favor of the holder of this Note, for such amount as may appear to be due and
unpaid thereon, together with reasonable costs of collection, including
reasonable attorney fees, and to waive and release all errors which may
intervene in any such proceedings, and to consent to immediate execution upon
judgment, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney may do by
virtue hereof.



    TIMOTHY J. SULLIVAN                   GLENN W. SCHMIDT
    -------------------                   ----------------
    Timothy J. Sullivan                  Glenn W. Schmidt
                                      Executive Vice President
                                       MARKET FACTS, INC.
#### State v. Dicks

108,293

02/12/14

Denied. ...

Unpublished
OVATION ACTIO M 

CORPORATE TRAVEL 810-^00302-061 Inr 

CONTROL NO 

February 16,2010 

The Honorable Ray LaHood -3 

Secretary ,-'^ 

United States Department of Transportation ~'' 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE oo 

Washington, D.C. ^ g 

20590 -. S 

Subject: Haneda Combination Services Allocation Proceeding DOT-OST-2010-OOlS 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

As a business partner of Continental Airlines and Continental Micronesia, I am writing in 

support of the carriers' joint application to provide new service to Tokyo Haneda Airport from 

New York/Newark (Continental) and from Guam (Continental Micronesia). 

I applaud your efforts on negotiating an historic open skies agreement with Japan which will 

lead to an opening of Haneda airport for U.S. carrier service later this year. I now urge you to 

select Continental to provide service connecting the U.S.'s financial and commercial center at 

New York/Newark with Tokyo's central/downtown airport. 

Liberty - Haneda service would provide a critical link between two of the world's largest 

economies and will help boost trade and commerce across the New York/Newark region. 

Continental has proven its commitment to the Asian region and to nonstop Tokyo service, and 

Haneda will be a valuable addition to our region and to Continental's network. The new 

York/Newark economy, millions of Americans on the U.S. east coast, the airline's thousands of 

employees and hundreds of thousands of U.S. consumers will benefit from Continental's 

proposed service and will work together to make Liberty International Airport - Haneda service 

a success much like Tokyo Narita has been and will continue to be a successful route from 

Newark Liberty. 

Regards, 

Sunil Mahtani 

Executive Vice President 

Ovation Travel Group 

7 I FIFTH AVENUE. NEW YORK. NY I000 3 

WWW.OVATIONTRAVEL.COM 

eOO.431,11 12 AN OVATION TRAVEL GROUP COMPANY
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION

File Name: 08a0332n.06

Filed: June 11, 2008

No. 07-4112

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

DALE GILLIS and DIANE GILLIS,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

HARTFORD INSURANCE,

Defendant-Appellee.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED

STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Before: MERRITT, MOORE, and ROGERS, Circuit Judges.

Rogers, Circuit Judge. The plaintiffs appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment

in favor of the defendant insurance company in this insurance coverage dispute. The plaintiffs, who

were harmed by an accident involving an uninsured motorist, claim that their automobile insurance

contract with the defendant entitled them to receive uninsured motorist benefits. The defendant,

however, argues that the plaintiffs’ insurance contract did not include such coverage. The parties

have primarily focused on the language of the insurance application rather than on the issued policy.

It is impossible to determine which party presents the correct interpretation of the insurance policy

because the plaintiffs failed to put the actual contract of insurance into the record.

The record does contain information regarding the content of the contract, in the form of a

company printout of a response to a computer inquiry, along with copies of endorsements. The body
No. 07-4112

Gillis v. Hartford Insurance

- 2 -

of this printout, apart from the endorsements, contains codes and numbers but not a single sentence.

To the extent that this printout could actually be considered the contract, we cannot construe it to

include uninsured motorist coverage.

For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          29,519
<SECURITIES>                                     7,969
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,842
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (340)
<INVENTORY>                                     11,655
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                70,694
<PP&E>                                          26,362
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,298
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 110,914
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,796
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             8
<OTHER-SE>                                      93,936
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   110,914
<SALES>                                         78,548
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                78,548
<CGS>                                           39,394
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   68,245
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (852)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (162)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,211
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,359
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,852
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,852
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.40
        

</TABLE>
No. 12-238.

#### Bhardwaj *v.*Pathak.

Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 10(a)(4)

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

The Board of Directors

Creo Inc.


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 33-34233, No. 33-46861, No. 33-87614, No. 33-97622, No. 33-97624 and No. 33-39364) of Scitex Corporation Ltd. of the following reports incorporated by reference in the Annual Report of Scitex Corporation Ltd. on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2002:

	·	 	Auditors’ Report to
        the Shareholders of Creo Inc. dated November 12, 2002, with respect to
        the Consolidated Financial Statements of Creo as at September 30, 2002
        and 2001 and for the years ended September 30, 2002, 2001 and 2000 incorporated
        by reference in the Form 40-F of Creo filed with the Securities and Exchange
    Commission on February 20, 2003 (“Form 40-F”); and
	 	 	 
	·	 	Comments by Auditor for U.S. Readers on Canada – U.S.
    Reporting Differences dated November 12, 2002 included in the Form 40-F.


 

/s/ KPMG LLP
(signed) KPMG LLP
Chartered Accountants

Vancouver, Canada

June 18, 2003
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 67 (Tuesday, April 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 16799]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-8883]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER94-968-017]


Electric Clearinghouse, Inc.; Notice of Filing

April 2, 1997.
    Take notice that on March 17, 1997, Electric Clearinghouse, Inc. 
tendered for filing a Notification of Change in Status.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-8883 Filed 4-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# C_2018139EN.01000801.xml

| 20.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 139/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 139/8

---

Notice for the attention of the persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/849, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2018/611, and in Regulation (EU) 2017/1509, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/602 concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic People's Republic of Korea

(2018/C 139/06)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons that appear in Annex II to Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/849 (1), as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2018/611 (2) and in Annex XVI to Regulation (EU) 2017/1509 (3), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/602 (4) concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

1

2

3

4

The Council of the European Union has decided that the persons that appear in the above-mentioned Annexes should be included in the list of persons and entities subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Decision (CFSP) 2016/849 and Regulation (EU) 2017/1509 concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic People's Republic of Korea. The grounds for the listing of the persons concerned appear in the relevant entries in those Annexes.

The attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated on the websites in Annex II to Regulation (EU) 2017/1509 concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 35 of the Regulation).

The persons concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned lists should be reconsidered, before 18 May 2018, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

Any observations received will be taken into account for the purpose of the Council's periodic review, in accordance with Article 36(2) of Decision (CFSP) 2016/849 and Article 34(7) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1509.

The attention of the persons concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council's decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 141, 28.5.2016, p. 79.

1

(2)  OJ L 101, 20.4.2018, p. 70.

2

(3)  OJ L 224, 31.8.2017, p. 1.

3

(4)  OJ L 101, 20.4.2018, p. 16.

4

---
No. 12-5671.

#### Carter *v.*Smith, Warden.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### State v. Suellentrop

111,743

04/21/2016

Denied.

Unpublished
**Exhibit 23.4**
**Consent of Registered Independent PublicAccountants**We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8(Nos. 333-7410, 333-7412, 333-11022, 333-13384, 333-102183and 333-97935) of Royal Dutch Petroleum Company of our reportdated March 5, 2003, except for Note 2(a) (FirstRestatement of Previously Issued Financial Statements),Note 12 (Earnings per share) and Note 15(Reconciliation between Netherlands GAAP and US GAAP (asrestated)) which are as of May 22, 2004 and except forNote 2(b) (Second Restatement of previously issuedfinancial statements) and Note 16 (Subsequent events),which are as of March 3, 2005, relating to the FinancialStatements of Royal Dutch Petroleum Company which is included inthis Amendment No. 2.
/s/ KPMG Accountants N.V.-----------------------------------------------------
**KPMG Accountants N.V.****The Hague — TheNetherlands**
March 3, 2005 Exhibits      **E5** 20-F/A (Amendment No. 2) 2002