alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Table HC7-6a. Home Office Equipment by Type of Rented Housing Unit, 

 Million U.S. Households, 2001

Home Office Equipment

RSE Column Factor:

Total

Rented

Units

Type of Rented Housing Unit

RSE

Row

Factors

Single-Family 

Apartments in Buildings With

Two to Four Units Five or More Units Mobile Home

0.5 0.8 1.0 0.9 3.0

Total ............................................... 34.3 10.5 7.4 15.2 1.1 6.9

Households Using 

Office Equipment .......................... 28.7 9.2 6.5 12.1 0.9 7.5

Personal Computers1 ................... 14.3 5.3 2.9 5.9 0.3 10.7

 Number of Desktop PCs

 1 .................................................. 11.0 4.0 2.4 4.4 0.3 11.4

 2 or more .................................... 1.7 0.7 0.2 0.7 Q 30.8

 Number of Laptop PCs

 1 .................................................. 2.9 1.0 0.6 1.2 Q 20.5

 2 or more .................................... 0.3 QQQQ 60.7

 Have Access to Internet ............. 11.8 4.3 2.3 5.1 Q 11.4

 Hours PCs Turned

 On Each Week 

 Less than 2 hours ....................... 2.7 0.8 0.6 1.1 Q 20.2

 2 to 15 hours ............................... 5.9 2.3 1.1 2.5 Q 14.7

 16 to 40 hours ............................. 2.7 1.0 0.6 1.1 Q 22.7

 More than 40 hours ..................... 1.4 0.6 0.2 0.5 Q 31.8

 On All the time ............................ 1.6 0.5 0.4 0.7 Q 27.3

 How PC is Used

 15 hours a Week or Less ............ 8.6 3.1 1.7 3.6 Q 12.9

 16 hours a Week or More ........... 5.8 2.1 1.2 2.3 Q 16.1

 Personal Use Only .................... 3.8 1.4 0.8 1.5 Q 18.5

 Business Use Only ................... 0.4 QQQQ 49.8

 Both Personal and Business ..... 1.6 0.6 0.3 0.7 Q 26.6

 Business Use of PC

 Other Business Use .................... 1.3 0.4 0.2 0.7 Q 30.5

 Used for Telecommuting ............. 0.7 0.3 Q 0.2 Q 53.3

 1 to 4 Days per Week ............... 0.4 QQQQ 82.3

 5 to 7 Days per Week ............... 0.3 QQQQ 54.7

 Printer

 Attached to PC ............................ 11.2 4.3 2.3 4.4 Q 11.9

 With Built-in Fax/Copier .............. 2.3 0.9 0.4 0.9 Q 22.2

 Without Built-in Fax/Copier ......... 9.0 3.4 1.9 3.5 Q 12.9

Other Office Equipment

 Cell/Mobile Telephone .................. 14.9 5.2 3.0 6.3 0.4 11.1

 Cordless Telephone ...................... 22.7 7.7 5.0 9.3 0.7 8.2

 Separate Facsimile Machine ........ 1.7 0.9 0.3 0.4 Q 24.4

 Separate Photocopier ................... 1.1 0.6 0.2 0.3 Q 32.0

 Telephone Answering Machine .... 17.0 5.3 3.7 7.5 0.5 9.2

1 These numbers could include a combination of Desktop and Laptop personal computers.

Q = Data withheld either because the Relative Standard Error (RSE) was greater than 50 percent or fewer than 10 households were sampled.

Notes: • To obtain the RSE percentage for any table cell, multiply the corresponding column and row factors. • Because of rounding, data may not sum to totals. 

• See "Glossary" for definition of terms used in this report.

Source: Energy Information Administration, Office of Energy Markets and End Use, Forms EIA-457 A, B, C of the 2001 Residential Energy Consumption Survey.

Energy Information Administration

2001 Residential Energy Consumption Survey: Housing Characteristics Tables
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 554 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 554

 Designating July 24, 2010, as ``National Day of the American Cowboy''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 16, 2010

  Mr. Enzi (for himself, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. Baucus, Mr. Bingaman, Mr. 
Conrad, Mr. Crapo, Mr. Johanns, Mr. Johnson, Mr. Reid, Mr. Roberts, Mr. 
Brownback, and Mr. Hatch) submitted the following resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

                             June 29, 2010

             Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Designating July 24, 2010, as ``National Day of the American Cowboy''.

Whereas pioneering men and women, recognized as ``cowboys'', helped establish 
        the American West;
Whereas the cowboy embodies honesty, integrity, courage, compassion, respect, a 
        strong work ethic, and patriotism;
Whereas the cowboy spirit exemplifies strength of character, sound family 
        values, and good common sense;
Whereas the cowboy archetype transcends ethnicity, gender, geographic 
        boundaries, and political affiliations;
Whereas the cowboy is an excellent steward of the land and its creatures, who 
        lives off the land and works to protect and enhance the environment;
Whereas cowboy traditions have been a part of American culture for generations;
Whereas the cowboy continues to be an important part of the economy through the 
        work of many thousands of ranchers across the Nation who contribute to 
        the economic well-being of every State;
Whereas millions of fans watch professional and working ranch rodeo events 
        annually, and rodeo is one of the most-watched sports in the Nation;
Whereas membership and participation in rodeo and other organizations that 
        promote and encompass the livelihood of cowboys span every generation 
        and transcend race and gender;
Whereas the cowboy is a central figure in literature, film, and music and 
        occupies a central place in the public imagination;
Whereas the cowboy is an American icon; and
Whereas the ongoing contributions made by cowboys and cowgirls to their 
        communities should be recognized and encouraged: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates July 24, 2010, as ``National Day of the 
        American Cowboy''; and
            (2) encourages the people of the United States to observe 
        the day with appropriate ceremonies and activities.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 24.1

                              ROBBINS & MYERS, INC.

                            LIMITED POWER OF ATTORNEY

            WHEREAS, Robbins & Myers, Inc. (the "Company") intends to file with
the Securities and Exchange Commission its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended August 31, 2004:

            NOW, THEREFORE, each of the undersigned in his capacity as a
director of the Company hereby appoints Peter C. Wallace his true and lawful
attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution,
to execute in his name, place and stead, the Company's Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended August 31, 2004, (including any amendment to such
report) and any and all other instruments necessary or incidental in connection
therewith, and to file the same with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Said attorney shall have full power and authority to do and perform in the name
and on behalf of the undersigned, in the aforesaid capacity, every act
whatsoever necessary or desirable to be done, as fully to all intents and
purposes as the undersigned might or could do in person. The undersigned hereby
ratifies and approves the act of said attorney.

            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this instrument
this 4th day of November, 2004.

                                                /s/ Thomas P. Loftis
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Thomas P. Loftis

                                                /s/ Daniel W. Duval
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Daniel W. Duval

                                                /s/ David T. Gibbons
                                                --------------------------------
                                                David T. Gibbons

                                                /s/ Robert J. Kegerreis
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Robert J. Kegerreis

                                                /s/ William D. Manning
                                                --------------------------------
                                                William D. Manning

                                                /s/ Dale L. Medford
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Dale L. Medford

                                                /s/ Jerome F. Tatar
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Jerome F. Tatar

                                       60
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 69 (Thursday, April 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 17579]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-9227]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Vermont Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting of 
the Vermont Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 12:30 
p.m. and adjourn at 4:30 p.m. on May 13, 1997, at the Sheraton Hotel 
and Conference Center, 870 Williston Road, Burlington, Vermont 05403. 
The purpose of the meeting is to receive updates from speakers on 
racial harassment in Vermont public schools and to continue work on a 
project proposal for a Committee activity in late fall 1997.
    Persons desiring additional information, or planning a presentation 
to the Committee, should contact Committee Chairperson Kimberly B. 
Cheney, 802-229-0334, or Ki-Taek Chun, Director of the Eastern Regional 
Office, 202-376-7533 (TDD 202-376-8116). Hearing-impaired persons who 
will attend the meeting and require the services of a sign language 
interpreter should contact the Regional Office at least five (5) 
working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission.

    Dated at Washington, DC, April 2, 1997.
Carol-Lee Hurley,
Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 97-9227 Filed 4-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JON EUGENE MINADEO,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D2023-2786

[August 15, 2024]

Appeal from the County Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Marni A. Bryson, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

502023MM002683CXXXMB.

Jon Eugene Minadeo, Ft. Pierce, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Luke R. Napodano, 

Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, CONNER and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,127
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,463
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 3,066
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                   834
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      3,474
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                         23,124
<ALLOWANCE>                                        372
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  34,284
<DEPOSITS>                                      26,901
<SHORT-TERM>                                     2,430
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                864
<LONG-TERM>                                      1,447
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              400
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,242
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  34,284
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                    923
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  112
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   116
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 1,151
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 410
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 533
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              618
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       45
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   7
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    410
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    393
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       235
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.94
<LOANS-NON>                                        279
<LOANS-PAST>                                        23
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   380
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       71
<RECOVERIES>                                        17
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  372
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               151
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 33
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            188


</TABLE>
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, April 24, 2018.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, April 24, 2018

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A18I0154. JOHN FREDRICKSON v. THE STATE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

17T04421
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6660

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DAMON EMANUEL ELLIOTT,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CR97-53-PJM, CA-99-2648-PJM)

Submitted: July 27, 2000 Decided: August 9, 2000

Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Damon Emanuel Elliott, Appellant Pro Se. Ranganath Manthripragada,

Assistant United States Attorney, John Vincent Geise, OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on

April 5, 2000, the district court’s records show that it was

entered on the docket sheet on April 6, 2000. Pursuant to Rules 58

and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date

that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the

effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v.

Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).

2

PER CURIAM:

Damon Emanuel Elliott seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. See United States v. Elliott, Nos. CR-97-53-

PJM; CA-99-2648-PJM (D. Md. Apr. 6, 2000).* We further deny

Elliott’s motions for the appointment of counsel and response to

informal brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
No. 12-5588.

#### Coke *v.*New York.

App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 4th Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF RUDDICK CORPORATION FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED
SEPTEMBER 29, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-29-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-02-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-29-1996
<CASH>                                      21,033,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               72,207,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,398,000
<INVENTORY>                                183,649,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           298,473,000
<PP&E>                                     687,871,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             277,304,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             801,702,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      233,339,000
<BONDS>                                    159,188,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    55,599,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 291,257,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               801,702,000
<SALES>                                  2,142,501,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         2,142,501,000
<CGS>                                    1,556,216,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            2,059,358,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             9,102,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          12,155,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             61,886,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                19,160,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         42,726,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                  76,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                42,802,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .92
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .92
        

</TABLE>
#### First National Bank of Omaha v. Price

111,062

07/22/2015

Denied..;....

Unpubhshed
# File Information

A4 - Vehicles by Model Year

Std Errors for A4

N Cells for A4

# A4 - Vehicles by Model Year

# Std Errors for A4

# N Cells for A4
(a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;(b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;(c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based upon
such evaluation; and(d)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and(b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 /s/ James L. HambrickJames L. HambrickChief Executive Officer and PresidentNovember 6, 2009
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 10 (Wednesday, January 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 2133]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-927]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

University of Southern California; Notice of Decision on 
Application for Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Instrument

    This decision is made pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, 
Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-
651, 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). Related records can be viewed 
between 8:30 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. in Room 4211, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, 14th and Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C.
    Docket Number: 95-061R. Applicant: University of Southern 
California, Los Angeles, CA 90033. Instrument: 3-Dimensional Motion 
Analyser, Model Vicon System 370. Manufacturer: Oxford Metrics, Ltd., 
United Kingdom. Intended Use: See notice at 60 FR 40823, August 10, 
1995.
    Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. No instrument of 
equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument, for such 
purposes as it is intended to be used, is being manufactured in the 
United States. Reasons: The foreign instrument provides: (1) exact 
synchronization of position and force data used in inverse dynamic 
analysis and (2) a unique software suite permitting instant 
visualization of both normal and pathological states of motion. These 
capabilities are pertinent to the applicant's intended purposes and we 
know of no other instrument or apparatus of equivalent scientific value 
to the foreign instrument which is being manufactured in the United 
States.
Frank W. Creel,
Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff.
[FR Doc. 97-927 Filed 1-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P