alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 69 (Thursday, April 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 17611]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-9288]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-138-002]


Shell Gas Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

April 4, 1997.
    Take notice that on April 1, 1997, Shell Gas Pipeline Company 
(SGPC) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original 
Volume No. 1, the sheets set forth on Appendix B to the filing in 
compliance with the Order in Docket Nos. RP97-138-000 and RP97-138-001 
issued March 6, 1997 to become effective June 1, 1997.
    SGPC states that the amended tariff sheets set forth revisions to 
SGPC's December 2, 1996 and January 17, 1997 tariff filings, made to 
comply with Order No. 587. The amended tariff sheets reflect changes 
for: (1) Certain standards that have been either incorporated verbatim 
or by reference; (2) revised intra-day nominations that allow for later 
effective times; and (3) include an end date to the shipper nomination 
form.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington D.C. 20426, in accordance with 18 CFR 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed by 
April 21, 1997. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make Protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are 
on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in 
the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-9288 Filed 4-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
IV 

House Calendar No. 90 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1092 

[Report No. 116–480] 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 8015) to maintain prompt and 

reliable postal services during the COVID–19 health emergency, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 22, 2020 

Mr. MCGOVERN, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 8015) to maintain prompt and reliable postal services during the 

COVID–19 health emergency, and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it 

2 shall be in order to consider in the House without inter3 vention of any question of consideration the bill (H.R. 

4 8015) to maintain prompt and reliable postal services dur5 ing the COVID–19 health emergency, and for other pur6 poses. All points of order against consideration of the bill 

7 are waived. An amendment in the nature of a substitute 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1092 RH 

1 consisting of the text of Rules Committee Print 116-61, 

2 modified by the amendment printed in the report of the 

3 Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution, shall 

4 be considered as adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be 

5 considered as read. All points of order against provisions 

6 in the bill, as amended, are waived. The previous question 

7 shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, 

8 and on any further amendment thereto, to final passage 

9 without intervening motion except: (1) two hours of debate 

10 equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking 

11 minority member of the Committee on Oversight and Re12 form; and (2) one motion to recommit with or without in13 structions. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
House Calendar No. 90 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1092 

[Report No. 116–480] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 8015) 

other purposes. during the COVID–19 health emergency, and for to maintain prompt and reliable postal services 

AUGUST 22, 2020 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### State v. Williams

107,431

10/28/13

Denied.

Unpublished
01/28/2010 19:54 FAX 2024835142 FAA + OMS.**~001/002**


## rwp- C r UC .j

. 

### Jr 

### JAN 

## 2 6 

## 2018 

## HEA.RtNG DOCKl:"v**Tod~** C. Emerson, 118175 4441South Ri vcr Road 

### 51, (Jjcorge. t Jtah, 84790 Tclqphone: (435) 634-3530 F<\dimik: (435) 634-3505 Att4ll1cy for SkyWcst Airlincs.lnc.



## --.--- "-'--"

. 

# __ ..

# -_. -- '-'-' UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMI£NT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASIHNGTON, D.C.

, _. I

In**~hc** Matter of:**S~yWcst** Airlines, Inc.

# ~TlC~ OF

# DEP~SITlON OF

# J~AN I NO PETERSON

FAA DOCKET CP009NMOOl2 OMS No. F AA-2009-0979
. FAA Case No. 2009NM060042 Judge: Richard C. Goodwin

PLEASE TAKENOTTCE that pursuant to 49 U.s.c. § 46104(0).49 C.F.R. 

### § 82 Ll9(a) 

### ahd the Federal Rules ofCivil Procedure, Respondent SkyWest Airlines will take the deposirion

### ~r Joan PelerSQn on February 24,2010 bcginning at 9:00 a.m" andcontinuingthcreafter unLil domplcred at the offices ofFabian & Clendenin. 215 South State Streel, Suite 1200, Salt Lake \tily, Utah 84111-2323 before a certified court reporter having the power to adminiSler oaths. !PATEl) this 18 1h day ofJanuary, 2010. 

# ·**L~.~--...a.--** Todd C. Emerson

.Attorney 

### tor SkyWest Airlines, Tnc.01/28/2010 1S:54 FAX 2024935142 FAA + OMS 002/002 '. 

# ­

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The**lImlcr~igned** hereby certilics that on this 18 1h day ofJanuary, 2010, I caused to be serv1ed the f()rcgoing 

### NOTICE OF DEPOSITION OF JOAN PETERSON 

### "it) facsimile and**Ul1i~ed** States mail, lirst class postage pre-paid. on the following:
Th<t Honorable Rich'.lrd C. Cioodwin Scoll R. MOITis**Of~C0** of I-/ealings, M-20 Federa.l Aviation Administration 

### 12QO New J..:;rscy Avenue, 

### S.E. Northwest Mountain Region, ANM·7**Ea~(** Bui 

### Iding Grollnd ",'Ioor, Rm E 12-320 J60 J Lind Avenue S. W. W./shington, D.C. 20590 Renton, Washington 98057 {U.s. Mail} {Facsimileawi 

# u.s. Maill**Fe~.kral** Aviation Administration 

## sob Independence Avenue SW**W~shinglon,** 

### DC 20591**A~itn:** Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wlilbur Wright Building .- Suite 2Wl000 

## (u.s. Mail}

2
Subsidiaries of the Registrant                        Exhibit 21 
     ------------------------------                        ----------

      The following is a list of the Registrant's subsidiaries (all 
      of which are 100% owned):

                                            State or Other Jurisdiction
                                                  Of Incorporation      
                                            ---------------------------  

      MATEC EFO Corp.                             Massachusetts
      Matec Fiberoptics, Inc.                     Massachusetts
      Matec International, Inc.                   Massachusetts
      Matec Microelectronics, Inc.                Massachusetts
      MEKontrol, Inc.                             Massachusetts
      MTCI, Inc.                                  Delaware
      Old BCT, Inc.                               New Jersey
      Old MAS, Inc.                               Delaware
      RSC Realty Corporation                      Delaware
      Valpey-Fisher Corporation                   Massachusetts


































                                      
<PAGE>
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of LSB Industries, Inc. (“LSB”), on Form
10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report").  I, Tony M.
Shelby, Executive Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of LSB,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      LSB.














/s/ Tony M. Shelby


Tony M.
Shelby


Executive
Vice President of Finance and


Chief
Financial Officer


(Principal
Financial Officer)








May 6,
2010








This
certification is furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission solely for
purpose of 18 U.S.C. §1350 subject to the knowledge standard contained therein
and not for any other purpose.
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-18-0000589

07-APR-2020

07:59 AM
S94A1750.

#### JENKINS v. THE STATE.

(453 SE2d 745)

Fletcher, Justice.

Agnew Jenkins, Jr. was convicted of murder and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony in the shooting death of Allen Gay.1 The trial court sentenced Jenkins to life imprisonment for murder and to five years, to run concurrently, on the possession charge. Jenkins appeals and we affirm.

Jenkins’ sole enumeration of error is that the evidence was insufficient to prove his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The evidence showed that on the morning of July 30, 1993, Jenkins approached Clarence Wallace and Gay, who were sitting on Wallace’s front porch. Jenkins displayed a .38 caliber handgun, stated that he intended to kill someone, and then shot the gun toward the back of the house. Jenkins and Gay then left Wallace’s house. A few minutes later, Wallace heard two gunshots and when he went to investigate, he discovered Gay lying on the sidewalk. Gay had been shot twice in the leg and once in the pelvic area. Jenkins’ sister, who was also Gay’s girl friend, testified that Jenkins came to her house later that morning *112and told her he had shot Gay “because he was running off at the mouth.” Jenkins’ niece also testified that Jenkins told her he had shot Gay in the leg. After reviewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the jury’s determination of guilt, we conclude that a rational trier of fact could have found Jenkins guilty of the crime charged. *Jackson v. Virginia,*443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979).

Decided March 6, 1995.

*Donald E. Strickland,*for appellant.

*Britt R. Priddy, District Attorney, Michael J. Bowers, Attorney General, Susan V. Boleyn, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Marla-Deen Brooks, Assistant Attorney General,*for appellee.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

1

 The crimes occurred on July 30, 1993. Jenkins was indicted on February 23, 1994. The verdict and sentence were filed on May 10, 1994. Jenkins’ notice of appeal was filed on June 3, 1994. The case was docketed in this court on August 10, 1994 and submitted for decision without oral argument on October 3, 1994.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-21109 Conference Calendar

__________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus DONALDO MUNOZ-VALLEJO, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. CR-H-95-220-ALL - - - - - - - - - - June 25, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Donaldo Munoz-Vallejo has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and we have independently reviewed the brief and record and found no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the Federal Public Defender is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5thNo. -2- Cir. R. 42.2. The motion to substitute counsel on appeal is DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 57 (Tuesday, March 25, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 14120]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-7432]



[[Page 14120]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army


Armed Forces Institute of Pathology Scientific Advisory Board; 
Meeting

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DOD.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, Public Law (92-463) announcement is made of the following open 
meeting:
    Name of Committee: Scientific Advisory Board (SAB).
    Dates of Meeting: 8-9 May 1997.
    Place: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Building 54, 14th St. & 
Alaska Ave, NW, Washington, DC 20306-6000.
    Time: 8 a.m.-4:30 p.m. (May 8, 1997), 8 a.m.-12 p.m. (May 9, 1997).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. Ridgely Rabold, Center for Advanced Pathology (CAP), AFIP, Building 
54, Washington, DC 20306-6000, phone (202) 782-2553.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

    General function of the Board: The Scientific Advisory Board 
provides scientific and professional advice and guidance on programs, 
policies, and procedures of the AFIP.
    Agenda: The Board will hear status reports from the AFIP Deputy 
Directors, Center for Advanced Pathology Director, the National Museum 
of Health and Medicine, and each of the pathology departments. Board 
members will visit several of the pathology departments.
    Open Board discussions. Reports will be given on all visited 
departments. The reports will consist of findings, recommended areas of 
further research, and suggested solutions. New trends and/or 
technologies will be discussed and goals established.
    The meeting is open to the public.
Paul E. Bluteau,
Col, MS, USA, Executive Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-7432 Filed 3-24-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
**EXHIBIT 21**

**SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT**

The listing below includes the significant subsidiaries of the Corporation. All subsidiaries are wholly owned, directly or indirectly, by Safeco Corporation. 

American States Insurance Company (IN) 

American EconomyInsurance Company (IN) 

American States Insurance Company of Texas (TX) 

American States Preferred Insurance Company (IN) 

First National Insurance Company of America (WA) 

General America Corporation (WA) 

F.B. Beattie &Company, Inc. (WA) 

General America Corporation of Texas (TX) 

American States Lloyds Insurance Company (TX) 

Safeco Lloyds Insurance Company (TX) 

General Insurance Company of America (WA) 

Safeco GeneralAgency, Inc. (TX) 

Safeco Insurance Company of Indiana (IN) 

Safeco Insurance Company of America (WA) 

Safeco Insurance Company of Oregon (OR) 

Safeco Surplus Lines Insurance Company (WA) 

Emerald City Insurance Agency, Inc. (WA) 

Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois (IL) 

Insurance Company of Illinois (IL) 

Safeco NationalInsurance Company (MO) 

Safeco Properties, Inc. (WA) 

Safecare Company, Inc. (WA) 

Winmar Company, Inc. (WA) 

Safeco Offshore Sourcing Private, Ltd. (India) 

Open Seas Solutions, Inc. (WA) 

Rianoc Research Corporation (WA)
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

____________________

No. 96-40361

____________________

HARTFORD LLOYDS INSURANCE COMPANY,

Plaintiff - Appellant-Cross-Appellee,

v.

AMERICAN PHYSICIANS,

Defendant - Appellee-Cross-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas, Corpus Christi

(C-94-CV-552)

_________________________________________________________________

June 5, 1997

Before KING, DAVIS, and DEMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

AFFIRMED. See Local Rule 47.6.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-10059

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ROY D THACKER, JR

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:01-CR-19-1

Before REAVLEY, BENAVIDES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Roy D. Thacker, Jr., raises

arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. Hinson, 429F.3d 114, 119 (5th

Cir. 2005), which held that a defendantis not entitled to a jury trialto determine

whether the terms of supervised release have been violated. The Government’s

motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district

court is AFFIRMED.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

January 30, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-10059

2
#### State v. Holloway

106,765

08/19/13

Denied.

Unpublished
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 303 

Expressing the sense of the Senate that October 17, 1984, the date of 

the restoration by the Federal Government of Federal recognition to 

the Confederated Tribes of Coos, Lower Umpqua, and Siuslaw Indians, 

should be memorialized. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 6, 2009 

Mr. WYDEN (for himself and Mr. MERKLEY) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the Senate that October 17, 1984, 

the date of the restoration by the Federal Government 

of Federal recognition to the Confederated Tribes of 

Coos, Lower Umpqua, and Siuslaw Indians, should be 

memorialized. 

Whereas the Coos, Lower Umpqua, and Siuslaw Restoration 

Act (25 U.S.C. 714 et seq.), which was signed by President Ronald Reagan on October 17, 1984, restored Federal recognition to the Confederated Tribes of Coos, 

Lower Umpqua, and Siuslaw Indians; 

Whereas the Confederated Tribes of Coos, Lower Umpqua, 

and Siuslaw Indians historically inhabited land now in 

the State of Oregon, from Fivemile Point in the south to 

Tenmile Creek in the north, west to the Pacific Ocean, 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 303 IS 

then east to the crest of the Coast Range, encompassing 

the watersheds of the Coos River, the Umpqua River to 

Weatherly Creek, the Siuslaw River, the coastal tributaries between Tenmile Creek and Fivemile Point, and 

portions of the Coquille watershed; 

Whereas in addition to restoring Federal recognition, the 

Coos, Lower Umpqua, and Siuslaw Restoration Act and 

other Federal Indian statutes have provided the means 

for the Confederated Tribes to achieve the goals of cultural restoration, economic self-sufficiency, and the attainment of a standard of living equivalent to that enjoyed by other citizens of the United States; 

Whereas by enacting the Coos, Lower Umpqua, and Siuslaw 

Restoration Act, the Federal Government declared that 

the Confederated Tribes of Coos, Lower Umpqua, and 

Siuslaw Indians were eligible for all Federal services and 

benefits provided to federally recognized tribes, provided 

the means to establish a tribal reservation, and granted 

the Confederated Tribes self-government for the betterment of tribal members, including the ability to set tribal 

rolls; 

Whereas the Confederated Tribes of Coos, Lower Umpqua, 

and Siuslaw Indians have embraced Federal recognition 

and self-sufficiency statutes and are actively working to 

better the lives of tribal members; and 

Whereas economic self-sufficiency, which was the goal of restoring Federal recognition for the Confederated Tribes 

of Coos, Lower Umpqua, and Siuslaw Indians, is being 

realized through many projects: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that Octo2 ber 17, 1984, should be memorialized as the date on which 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 303 IS 

1 the Federal Government restored Federal recognition to 

2 the Confederated Tribes of Coos, Lower Umpqua, and 

3 Siuslaw Indians. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.2








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lufkin Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Christopher L. Boone, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Christopher L. Boone


Christopher L. Boone


Chief Financial Officer


May 10, 2010





This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. §1350, and not for any other purpose.
From: Matthew Todd <ToddM@api.org> 

Sent: 04/12/2012 03:17 PM 

To: Penny Lassiter/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Brenda Shine/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Subject: API Refinery MACT 1 and 2 Startup/Shutdown Paper 

Penny and Brenda, 

As another follow up from our March 21 meeting, the attached is a preliminary summary of 

startup/shutdown and other operating scenarios that we believe should be taken into consideration 

as the Agency drafts the RTR proposed rules. Happy to arrange a conference call or meeting and 

make our technical experts available to discuss further. Please let me know. 

Thanks, 

Matt 

 

Matthew Todd 

Senior Policy Advisor 

API 

202.682.8319 

<< 2012 04 12 Startup Shutdown.pdf >>