# C_2022148EN.01003701.xml

| 4.4.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.4.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/37

---

Action brought on 11 February 2022 — Euranimi v Commission

(Case T-81/22)

(2022/C 148/49)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: European Association of Non-Integrated Metal Importers & distributors (Euranimi) (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: M. Campa, D. Rovetta, P. Gjørtler and V. Villante, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2012 of 17 November 2021 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and definitively collecting the provisional duty imposed on imports of stainless steel cold-rolled flat products originating in India and Indonesia, (1) as published in the Official Journal of the European Union on 18 November 2021, concerning the measures adopted in the context of the anti-dumping proceeding AD670; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2012 of 17 November 2021 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and definitively collecting the provisional duty imposed on imports of stainless steel cold-rolled flat products originating in India and Indonesia, (1) as published in the Official Journal of the European Union on 18 November 2021, concerning the measures adopted in the context of the anti-dumping proceeding AD670;

| — | order the European Commission to bear applicant’s legal costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Commission to bear applicant’s legal costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging breach of Article 3(4) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council, (2) with regard to the cumulative assessment of the effects of imports from the countries concerned — infringement of the applicant’s rights of defence — manifest error of assessment. |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging breach of Article 3(4) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council, (2) with regard to the cumulative assessment of the effects of imports from the countries concerned — infringement of the applicant’s rights of defence — manifest error of assessment.

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging breach of Article 3(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036, with regard to the injury and causation assessment for both Indian and Indonesia’s originating products — manifest error of assessment. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging breach of Article 3(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036, with regard to the injury and causation assessment for both Indian and Indonesia’s originating products — manifest error of assessment.

| 3. | Third plea in law, alleging wrong assessment of the Union interest justifying the imposition of anti-dumping duties. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Third plea in law, alleging wrong assessment of the Union interest justifying the imposition of anti-dumping duties.

---

(1)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2012 of 17 November 2021 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and definitively collecting the provisional duty imposed on imports of stainless steel cold-rolled flat products originating in India and Indonesia (OJ 2021 L 410, p. 153).

(2)  Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union (OJ 2016 L 176, p. 21).

---