alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This legend contains summary information extracted from the Form 10-Q and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000820068
<NAME> NEW YORK BANCORP INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          30,284
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                11,400
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    321,922
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         585,609
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           572,911
<LOANS>                                      1,682,617
<ALLOWANCE>                                   (20,723)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,695,288
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,757,211
<SHORT-TERM>                                   729,492
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             51,360
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           147
<OTHER-SE>                                     157,078
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               2,695,288
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 34,941
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               15,598
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   120
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                50,659
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              15,881
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,991
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           23,668
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      300
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 631
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 11,910
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,027
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       7,828
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,828
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .64
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.61
<LOANS-NON>                                     28,835
<LOANS-PAST>                                     4,900
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 8,500
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                21,272
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      870
<RECOVERIES>                                        21
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               20,723
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            20,723
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0<F1>
<FN>
<F1> Not contained in this document.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### State v. Lemons

108,895

12/29/2015

Denied.

Unpublished
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion *

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-30176

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

TONY JONES, also known as Boochie

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:06-CR-269-4

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and STEWART and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Tony Jones appeals the total 240-month sentence imposed following his

guilty plea conviction for conspiring to distribute 50 grams or more of cocaine

base and a quantity of cocaine hydrochloride and conspiring, during and in

relation to a drug trafficking crime, to use, carry, and possess firearms in

furtherance of the drug trafficking crime. Jones argues that the district court

erred by treating his 2003 state felony drug conviction as a “prior conviction” for

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

May 4, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-30176

2

purposes of enhancing his sentence pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A). He

argues that because he was convicted of the state felony drug offense during the

time period of the conspiracy alleged in the federal indictment, the state felony

drug conviction could not have been a “prior conviction” for purposes of

§ 841(b)(1)(A).

The issue is a question of law ordinarily subject to de novo review. See

United States v. Mankins, 135 F.3d 946, 949 (5th Cir. 1998). The Government

argues that review should be limited to plain error. We need not decide the

question of the appropriate standard of review because the district court did not

err.

The mandatory minimum term of imprisonment for § 841(a) offenses

increases to 20 years of imprisonment if the defendant “commits such a violation

after a prior conviction for a felony drug offense has become final.”

§ 841(b)(1)(A). Jones does not dispute that his state conviction was final or that

the conviction was for a felony drug offense. The issue for appeal is whether the

conviction constitutes a “prior conviction” for purposes of § 841(b)(1)(A). The

sentence enhancement was proper because Jones’s 2003 state felony drug

conviction was final well before the 2006 end of the conspiracy as alleged in the

federal indictment. See United States v. Green, 293 F.3d 886, 894 (5th Cir.

2002); United States v. Wheelock, No. 93-8433, 21 F.3d 1109, 1994 WL 171737

at *3 (5th Cir. Apr. 29, 1994) (unpublished); see also 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.3

(unpublished opinions issued before January 1, 1996, are precedent); c.f. United

States v. Hass, 150 F.3d 443, 450 (5th Cir. 1998).

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANDREW M. HUNTER; ANGELA A. 

HUNTER, 

Petitioners-Appellants, 

 v. 

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL 

REVENUE, 

Respondent-Appellee. 

No. 16-70308 

Tax Ct. No. 20732-15 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from a Decision of the

United States Tax Court

Submitted March 8, 2017**

Before: LEAVY, W. FLETCHER, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Andrew M. Hunter and Angela A. Hunter appeal from the Tax Court’s order 

dismissing for lack of jurisdiction their action related to their tax liability for tax 

years 2012 and 2013. We have jurisdiction under 26 U.S.C. § 7482(a). We review 

de novo, Gorospe v. Comm’r, 451 F.3d 966, 968 (9th Cir. 2006), and we affirm. 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAR 21 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
 2 16-70308 

The Tax Court properly concluded that it lacked jurisdiction over the 

petition because the petition was not filed within 90 days of the notice of 

deficiency. See 26 U.S.C. § 6213(a) (establishing a 90-day requirement for 

appealing a notice of deficiency); 26 U.S.C. § 7502(a)(2) (timely mailing treated as 

timely filing “only if . . . deposited in the mail in the United States in an envelope

. . . properly addressed to the agency . . . ”); Gorospe, 451 F.3d at 968 (the Tax 

Court is a court of limited jurisdiction, and its subject matter is determined by 

Title 26 of the United States Code).

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF HARBOURTON FINANCIAL SERVICES L.P. FOR THE NINE MONTHS
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000820167
<NAME> HARBOURTON FINANCIAL SERVICES
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                           7,585
<SECURITIES>                                     2,771
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,624
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               191,906
<PP&E>                                           6,788
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,952
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 314,966
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          262,835
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      52,131
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   314,966
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,770
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,786
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,174
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,562
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,248
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,248
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,248
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .26
        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme 

Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 17, 2015

Order 

March 17, 2015

150939(48)

CITY OF CORUNNA,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL 

QUALITY,

Defendant-Appellee.

SC: 150939

COA: 316841

Shiawassee CC: 10-001242-CZ

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiff-appellant to extend the time 

for filing its reply brief is GRANTED. The reply brief will be accepted as timely filed if 

submitted on or before March 23, 2015.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

RUDDICK CORPORATION
STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                               FISCAL YEAR ENDED
                                                                      ------------------------------------
                                                                      SEPTEMBER 28,          SEPTEMBER 29,
                                                                           1997                   1996
                                                                       -----------            -----------
<S>                                                                   <C>                    <C>        
NET INCOME PER SHARE COMPUTED AS FOLLOWS:
PRIMARY:

  1.  NET INCOME                                                       $47,730,519            $42,802,071
                                                                       ===========            ===========
  2.  WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING                        46,548,800             46,420,098

  3.  INCREMENTAL SHARES UNDER STOCK OPTIONS COMPUTED UNDER
        THE TREASURY STOCK METHOD USING THE AVERAGE MARKET
        PRICE OF ISSUER'S STOCK DURING THE PERIODS                         283,609                198,852
                                                                       -----------            -----------
  4.  WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES AND
        COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARES OUTSTANDING                            46,832,409             46,618,950
                                                                       ===========            ===========
  5.  NET INCOME PER SHARE (ITEM 1 DIVIDED BY ITEM 4)                  $      1.02            $       .92
                                                                       ===========            ===========

FULLY DILUTED:

  1.  NET INCOME                                                       $47,730,519            $42,802,071
                                                                       ===========            ===========
  2.  WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES  OUTSTANDING                       46,548,800             46,420,098

  3.  INCREMENTAL SHARES UNDER STOCK OPTIONS COMPUTED
        UNDER THE TREASURY STOCK METHOD USING THE HIGHER
        OF THE AVERAGE OR ENDING MARKET PRICE OF ISSUER'S
        STOCK AT THE END OF THE PERIODS                                    323,985                232,338
                                                                       -----------            -----------
  4.  WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES AND
        COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARES OUTSTANDING                            46,872,785             46,652,436
                                                                       ===========            ===========
  5.  NET INCOME PER SHARE (ITEM 1 DIVIDED BY ITEM 4)                  $      1.02            $       .92
                                                                       ===========            ===========
</TABLE>
#### Bedford v. State

110,023

07/21/2015

Denied.

Unpublished
#### Chambers v. Wesley Medical Center

107,350

09/04/13

Denied.

Unpublished
No. 12-6171.

#### Dixon *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
#### State v. Rocheleau

110,243

06/21/2016

Granted.

Unpublished
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

JOHN TISBY

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 3366

[ March 1, 2018 ]

Appeal of order denying 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the

Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Elizabeth A. Scherer

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 12

- 427 CF10A

.

John Tisby, Arcadia, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

C IKLIN

, C ONNER and K UNTZ , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### Siruta v. Siruta

105,698

10/17/13

Granted

Unpublished
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 65 (Friday, April 4, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16205-16206]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-8653]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Upon Written Request Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange 
Commission, Office of Filings and Information Services, Washington, DC 
20549
Existing Collection: Rule 17a-6, SEC File No. 270-433, OMB Control No. 
3235-new

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act 
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange 
Commission (``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management 
and Budget a request for approval of the following rule:
    Rule 17a-6 (17 CFR 240.17a-6) permits national securities 
exchanges, national securities associations, registered clearing 
agencies, and the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (collectively, 
``SROs'') to destroy or convert to microfilm or other recording media 
records maintained under Rule 17a-1, if they have filed a record 
destruction plan with the Commission and the Commission has declared 
such plan effective.
    There are 25 SROs: 8 national securities exchanges, 1 national 
securities associations, 15 registered clearing agencies, and the 
Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board. These respondents file no more 
than one record destruction plan per year, which requires approximately 
40 hours for each respondent. Thus, the total compliance burden is 40 
hours. The approximate cost per hour is $100, resulting in a total cost 
of compliance for these respondents of $4,000 per year (40 hours @ 
$100).
    General comments regarding the estimated burden hours should be 
directed to the Desk Officer for the Securities and Exchange Commission 
at the address below. Any comments concerning the accuracy of the 
estimated average burden hours for compliance with Commission rules and 
forms should be directed to Michael E. Bartell, Associate Executive 
Director, Office of Information Technology, Securities and Exchange 
Commission, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.

[[Page 16206]]

20549 and Desk Officer for the Securities and Exchange Commission, 
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and 
Budget, Room 3208, New Executive Office Building, Washington, D.C. 
20503.

    Dated: March 28, 1997.
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-8653 Filed 4-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
S95Y0738.

#### IN THE MATTER OF DONALD O. NELSON.

(461 SE2d 874)

Per curiam.

Respondent, Donald 0. Nelson, pled guilty to one count of money laundering, 18 USC §§ 2 and 1956, and was sentenced in January 1995, to a period of probation, not exceeding five years. As a condition of probation, Nelson reserved the right to appeal his conviction. The State Bar brought this disciplinary proceeding pursuant to Rule 4-106 of the Rules and Regulations of the State Bar of Georgia, *716seeking to suspend Nelson from the practice of law pending the resolution of his appeal.

Decided September 11, 1995 —

Reconsideration denied October 13, 1995.

*William P. Smith III, General Counsel State Bar, E. Duane Cooper, Assistant General Counsel State Bar,*for State Bar of Georgia.

Following a hearing, the special master found that Nelson was guilty of a felony in violation of Standard 66 of Bar Rule 4-102, and recommended to this Court that he be suspended from the practice of law pending the resolution of his appeal.

Nelson has filed exceptions in this Court to the report of the special master. He contends that a suspension pending the outcome of his appeal is not mandatory under Bar Rule 4-106, and that, under the circumstances of this case, he should not be suspended during the pendency of his appeal.

Having reviewed the record and the transcript of the hearing, we agree with the special master’s recommendation. Therefore, we order that Nelson be suspended from the practice of law pending the outcome of his appeal. Nelson is reminded of his duties under Bar Rule 4-219 (c) to timely notify all clients of his inability to represent them, to take all actions necessary to protect the interests of his clients, and to certify to this Court that he has satisfied the requirements of that rule.

*Suspended pending appeal.*

*All the Justices concur.*
J. Darren Byers 

jdbyers@jdbyers.com 

LAW OFFICES OF J. DARREN BYERS 

A Professional Association 

m OFJhAlf PORWION lOS west Fourth Street 

IX.; Kris Suite 400, O'Hanlon Building 

Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27101 

Telephone: 336-727-1070 

Facsimile: 336-727-1085 

www.jdbyers.com 

Mattjh9,2010 

HearinsDd^l ^ 

JDB/tch 

cc: 

Michael Jacob, Respondent 
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

IN THE MATTER OF 

RUSHMORE HELICOPTERS, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP10GL0002 

(EIR2009-GL-27-0021) 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS No. FAA-2010-023 

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE 

RICHARD C. GOODWIN 

'•»« j 

' ^'"< - 8 20tO 

^ 11 

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL AS COUNSEL OF RECORD 

NOW COMES, J. Darren Byers of the Law Offices of J. Darren Byers, P. A. and 

respectfully shows unto the Court that Respondent has requested to proceed without the services 

of counsel of record. That good cause exists to permit the withdrawal of the Law Offices of J. 

Darren Byers as attorney of record and that said attorney is hereby allowed to withdraw as 

attorney of record. 

This the^vV day of March, 2010. 

J. Darre uenBy^ n By, Sta&ar# Sta4\Bi : 20479 

Attorney for Defendant 

OF COUNSEL: 

The Law Offices of J. Darren Byers, P.A. 

105 West Fourth Street 

Suite 400, O'Hanlon Building 

Winston-Salem, NC 27101 

Telephone: (336) 727-1070 

Facsimile: (336) 727-1085 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

The undersigned hereby certifies that on the"ll day of March, 2010, a copy of NOTICE 

OF WITHDRAWAL AS COUNSEL OF RECORD was duly served on the person(s) set out 

on the attached Service List by either hand delivery,^ facsimile or depositing .a,< 

Law Offices of J. Darren Byers, P*A< 

105 West Fourth Street 

Suite 400, O'Hanlon Building 

Winston-Salem, NC 27101 

Telephone: (336) 727-1070 

Facsimile: (336) 727-1085 
FAA Docket No. CP10GL0002 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

Original and One Copy: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilber Wright Building- Suite 2W1000 

One Copy: 

Chris G. Zurales, Complainant's Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Great Lakes Region, AGL-7K 

2300 East Devon Avenue 

DesPlaines,IL 60018 

Phone: 847-294-7713 

Fax: 847-294-7498 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room E12-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

Phone: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Legal Assistant 

Fax: 202-366-7536 

Michael Jacob, Respondent 

President or CEO 

Rushmore Helicopters, Inc. 

24564 Highway 16/385 

Custer, SD 57730
Exhibits
**Exhibit 23.2**
**Consent of Registered Independent PublicAccountants**We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No333-7590) of Royal Dutch Petroleum Company and The“Shell” Transport and Trading Company, Public LimitedCompany of our report dated May 23, 2004, except forNote 2(c) (Second Restatement of previously issuedfinancial statements), Note 12 (Reconciliation between USGAAP and UK GAAP (as restated)) and Note 14 (Subsequentevents), which are as of March 3, 2005 relating to theFinancial Statements of The “Shell” Transport andTrading Company, Public Limited Company which is included inthis Amendment No. 2 to the 2003 Annual Report onForm 20-F.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP--------------------------------------------------------------------
**PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP****London — United Kingdom**
March 3, 2005 Royal Dutch/Shell Group of Companies **E3** 20-F/A (Amendment No. 2) 2003