alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                       1,716,609
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  402,622
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,197,209
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,418,508
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          905,078
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             8
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,513,422
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,418,508
<SALES>                                        535,806
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               650,549
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,636
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                629,913
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            629,913
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   629,913
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .31
        

</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 DATE: August 7, 2007
    By:
    /s/ Herm RosenmanHerm RosenmanSenior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          39,730
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,421
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     15,455
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                60,741
<PP&E>                                       4,186,874
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,120,795
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,138,987
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           90,116
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,138,987
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               191,266
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  238,030
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,400
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (51,164)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (51,164)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (51,164)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (11.58)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (11.58)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 237 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 237

  Commending Blue Star Families for supporting military families and 
    increasing awareness of the unique challenges of military life.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 4, 2009

 Mr. Warner submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Commending Blue Star Families for supporting military families and 
    increasing awareness of the unique challenges of military life.

Whereas more than 1,000,000 United States troops have served in ongoing 
        operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, including members of the National 
        Guard and Reserve;
Whereas the millions of immediate family members of United States 
        servicemembers, including spouses, children, and parents, have 
        contributed and sacrificed as well;
Whereas the families of each servicemember contribute vitally to the strength of 
        the United States Armed Forces;
Whereas military families, often facing significant challenges such as long 
        separations from loved ones and frequent household moves, are civilians 
        who serve in support of United States servicemembers;
Whereas Blue Star Families is an organization of family members of active duty, 
        National Guard, and Reserve members of the Armed Forces serving during 
        war time, and connects military families with civilian communities, 
        increases awareness of the unique challenges of military life, and 
        provides morale and support for military families; and
Whereas, in order for military families to continue to support servicemembers 
        during this extended period of conflict, the Senate and people of the 
        United States should support military families: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) recognizes the sacrifices made by Blue Star Families as 
        members of military families and as an organization dedicated 
        to all military families and improving the welfare of the 
        United States;
            (2) commends the patriotic efforts of Blue Star Families;
            (3) commends, and offers sincere thanks to, all 
        servicemembers and military families; and
            (4) urges the people of the United States to acknowledge 
        the inspirational sacrifices of military families.
                                 <all>
```
No. 12-251.

#### Drew *v.*Illinois ex rel. Glasgow et al.

Sup. Ct. Ill. Certiorari denied.
#### State v. Baker

111,816

111,817

12/14/2015

Denied.

Unpublished
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    12-MOS 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998 
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998 
<CASH>                                          12,100 
<SECURITIES>                                         0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                   54,800 
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,600 
<INVENTORY>                                     19,000 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               116,000 
<PP&E>                                       1,977,000 
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,258,700 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 859,000 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          139,200 
<BONDS>                                              0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0 
<PREFERRED>                                          0 
<COMMON>                                         1,000 
<OTHER-SE>                                     347,400 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   859,000 
<SALES>                                        290,400 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               291,000 
<CGS>                                          445,000 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  445,000 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,800 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (162,900)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (64,200)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (98,700)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0 
<CHANGES>                                            0 
<NET-INCOME>                                   (98,700)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.96)  
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.96)  
                                           

</TABLE>
# Air Açores

U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590

To Whom It May Concern Head Office Av. Infante D. Henrique, 55 9504

– 528 Ponta Delgada

Açores Portugal Telf : 351 296 209 710 /1 Fax : +351 296 672 090



### APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION 787

SATA Air Açores is an airline based in the Azores, Portugal , w h ich operates scheduled regional passenger and cargo air services within the Azores and Madeira islands.
SATA Air Açores wishes to register its support for the IATA’s filing of Resolution 787 and kindly request s that the DOT approve s the new IATA Resolutio n 787

. It i s SATA Air Açores understanding that the New Distribution Capability will benefit all stakeholders on the airline distribution business, including the consumer, and at the same allow for a more open, innovative , agile and competitive environment

. The present and traditional distribution model constrains the capability for an airline to distribute its products . Today the basic product of an airline is completely commoditized and this requires a new business reality , in terms of airline passenger d istribution , allowing for total visibility over the airline offer
to a c onsumer – the offer is not only based on price but on value to the consumer. SATA Air Açores would like to submit the additional comments:

 The curre nt model for the transmi ss ion of data between airline and its partners is outdate d and doesn’t allow for the full information to be presented to the consumer, neither allows the existence of an open communic ation environment

– the current standards are prior to the existence of the intern et

.

 The adoption of an open standard based on XML data transmiss ion allows a more easier, faster and cheaper way for airline s to integrate with partners and a t the same time provides customers with more information on fare alternatives (based on value and not on cost), additional services, on board amenities and others

.

 The usage of a standard XML will allow airlines with less resources (like ours) to be able to integrate their products with business partners in a more direct and cost effective manner

.

 Airl ines are not able to communicate their products on the indirect channels in the same way they are on their own web sites

– this generates a huge competitive disadvantage for airlines with less marketing resources

.

 The Resolution 787 establishes a standard shared by all stakeholders. The internet as it is today makes this a well proven approach

.

 The implementation of systems supported by the NDC will both allow customers to have transparency and access to the full information on the products they looking at and comparability with the offer of competitive airlines.
Yours sincerely,

Paulo Ornelas IT Director
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-11-00029- CV

NNN M et C enter 10-1, LLC; NNN M et C enter 10-2, LLC; NNN M et C enter 10-3, LLC; NNN M et C enter 10-4, LLC; NNN M et C enter 10-5, LLC; NNN M et C enter 10-6, LLC; NNN M et C enter 10-7, LLC; NNN M et C enter 10-8, LLC; NNN M et C enter 10-9, LLC; NNN M et C enter 10-10, LLC; NNN M et C enter 10-11, LLC; NNN M et C enter 10-13, LLC; NNN M et C enter 10-14, LLC; NNN M et C enter 10-15, LLC; NNN M et C enter 10-16, LLC; NNN M et C enter 10-17, LLC; NNN M et C enter 10-18, LLC; NNN M et C enter 10-19, LLC; NNN M et C enter 10-20, LLC; NNN M et C enter 10-21, LLC; NNN M et C enter 10-22, LLC; NNN M et C enter 10-23, LLC; NNN M et C enter 10-24, LLC; NNN M et C enter 10-25, LLC;

NNN M et C enter 10-26, LLC; NNN M et C enter 10-27, LLC; and NNN M et C enter 10-28, LLC, Appellan ts

v. BACM 2005-3 M et C enter Of fi ce, LLC; M ark L. Pat ter son; Jeff rey J. Z issa; R. Terr y Miller; E. Joe Berge r, III; John A. Bain ; Mic hael C. Elrod; Beverly A. Houston;

Juani ta Strickland; Jani e Mucha; LNR P artner s, LLC; and Barclays Capital Real Estate , Inc., Appellees

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TRAVIS CO UNTY, 98TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. D-1 -GN-1 0-0 0449 8, H ONO RAB LE STEP HEN Y ELENOSK Y , JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

We previously abate d this appea l beca use, as a result of NNN Met Center 1 0 -2 5 ’s filing for bankruptc y protec tion in the United States Ba nkruptcy Court f

or the Norther

n District of C alifornia, this suit has been automatically stay ed. See Tex. R. App. P

. 8. Appellants have filed 1

See 11 U.S.C. § 362. 1an unopposed motion to extend abate ment, informing us that the automatic stay has been extended

until Februa

ry 28, 2012. We gr ant appe llants’ motion. Any party may file a motion to reinstate the appea l if permitted by fede ral law or the bankruptc y court. See Tex. R. App. P. 8.3. I t is the parties’ responsibility to notify the Court as soon as possible if an e vent occ urs that would allow re instatement. Id. Fa ilure to notify this Court of a lift of the automatic stay or the conclusion of the bankruptc y proce eding may result in dismissal of the ca se for

want of pr osecution. See Tex. R. App. P . 42.3(b).

__________________________________________ Bob Pembe rton, J ustice
Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Pemberton and Rose
Ba nkruptcy Filed: Nove mber 17, 2011

2
# Table 4.4

# RSE 4.4
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Submitted April 21, 2015*

Decided April 22, 2015

Before

WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge

DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge

JOHN DANIEL TINDER, Circuit Judge

No. 14-3551 Appeal from the

United States District Court

RICHARD GOODWIN,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent-Appellee.

for the Northern District of Illinois, 

Eastern Division.

No. 13 C 5038

Matthew F. Kennelly,

Judge.

O R D E R

Richard Goodwin filed a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 seeking to vacate his 

sentence under the Armed Career Criminal Act. 18 U.S.C. § 924(e). In 2003 a jury found 

Goodwin guilty of possessing a firearm as a felon. See id. § 922(g)(1). At sentencing the 

district court pointed to three previous felony convictions and sentenced him as a career 

offender to 235 months’ imprisonment. See id. § 924(e)(1). Goodwin appealed, and we 

affirmed the conviction but remanded for the district court to consider only whether it 

would have imposed the same sentence in light of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 

* After examining the briefs and record, we have concluded that oral argument is 

unnecessary. Thus, the appeal is submitted on the briefs and record. See FED. R. APP.

P. 34(a)(2)(C).

NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1

 
No. 14-3551 Page 2

(2005). The district court said on remand that it would have imposed the same sentence,

and we affirmed. United States v. Goodwin, 173 F. App’x 506 (7th Cir. 2006).

In 2013 Goodwin filed a motion under § 2255 asserting violations of his Fifth and 

Sixth Amendment rights when the court relied on the three prior felony convictions to 

sentence him as a career offender without having a jury find the fact of the convictions 

beyond a reasonable doubt. See Alleyne v. United States, 133 S. Ct. 2151 (2013). The district 

court denied his motion, concluding that under Almendarez-Torres v. United States,

felonies that form the basis for a § 924(e)(1) sentence enhancement need not be found by 

a jury. 523 U.S. 224 (1998). A few days later the judge issued a certificate of appealability.

On appeal Goodwin concedes that Almendarez-Torres forecloses his argument, 

and so he seeks merely to preserve the issue for review in the Supreme Court. We have 

many times stated that the rule announced in Almendarez-Torres was not changed by 

Alleyne and remains good law. See United States v. Long, 748 F.3d 322, 329 (7th Cir. 2014); 

United States v. Johnson, 743 F.3d 1110, 1111 (7th Cir. 2014); United States v. Boyce, 742 F.3d 

792, 799 (7th Cir. 2014). We are bound by Almendarez-Torres and leave to the Supreme 

Court whether to revisit that decision. 

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gen-Probe Incorporated (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2004 (the
"Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the
date hereof, I, Herm Rosenman, Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge, that:

     (i)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and
          Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Report and
          results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the
          Report.


                                             /s/ Herm Rosenman
DATE: August 9, 2004                    By:  ------------------------

                                             Herm Rosenman
                                             Vice President, Finance and Chief
                                             Financial Officer

This certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act, or otherwise
subject to the liability of Section 18 of the Exchange Act. Such certification
shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the
Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 64 (Thursday, April 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 15881]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-8490]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket Nos. EC97-17-000, ER94-1685-012, ER95-393-012, ER95-892-011, 
and ER96-2652-003]


Citizens Lehman Power L.L.C.; Notice of Filing

March 21, 1997.
    Take notice that on March 11, 1997, Citizens Lehman Power L.L.C., 
on behalf of this power marketing subsidiaries and affiliates, Citizens 
Lehman Power Sales, CL Hartford, L.L.C., CL Power Sales One, L.L.C., CL 
Power Sales Two, L.L.C., CL Power Sales Three, L.L.C., CL Power Sales 
Four, L.L.C., CL Power Sales Five, L.L.C., CL Power Sales Six, L.L.C., 
CL Power Sales Seven, L.L.C., CL Power Sales Eight, L.L.C., CL Power 
Sales Nine, L.L.C., CL Power Sales Ten, L.L.C. (collectively, the CLP 
Marketing Affiliates), filed an application pursuant to section 203 of 
the Federal Power Act for authorization of a transaction pursuant to 
which Peabody would acquire 100 percent direct ownership of CLP, and 
one percent direct ownership interests of Citizens Lehman Power Sales 
and CL Hartford, L.L.C., along with indirect control of all of the CLP 
Marketing Affiliates.
    The filing also constitutes a notice of change in status for the 
CLP Marketing Affiliates as a result of the Peabody acquisition.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said application 
should file a petition to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214. All such petitions 
or protests should be filed on or before April 9, 1997. Protests will 
be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action 
to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants participants to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this application are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-8490 Filed 4-2-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M