alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Table HC7-7a. Home Office Equipment by Four Most Populated States, 

 Million U.S. Households, 1997

Home Office Equipment

RSE Column Factor:

Total

Four Most Populated States

RSE

Row

Factors

New York California Texas Florida

0.4 1.1 1.1 1.5 1.3

Total .............................................................. 101.5 6.8 11.5 7.0 5.9 NF

Households Using

Office Equipment ......................................... 80.5 5.4 8.9 5.2 4.7 1.9

Personal Computers ................................... 35.6 2.2 4.6 2.6 2.0 5.9

 Number of PCs

 1 ................................................................ 29.6 1.8 3.6 2.2 1.6 7.9

 2 or more ................................................... 5.9 0.3 1.0 0.4 0.4 16.6

 Modem Connecting PC

 to Telephone Line ...................................... 20.7 1.2 2.9 1.4 1.4 7.9

 PC Uses a Laser Printer ............................ 12.6 0.9 1.5 1.1 0.6 11.8

 Hours PCs Turned

 On Each Week 

 Less than 2 hours ...................................... 8.2 0.5 0.8 0.5 0.3 17.3

 2 to 15 hours ............................................. 17.4 1.1 2.3 1.3 1.0 10.8

 16 to 40 hours ........................................... 6.7 0.5 1.0 0.4 0.4 14.3

 On All the time ........................................... 3.3 0.2 0.5 0.3 0.3 17.5

 How PC is Used

 15 hours a Week or Less .......................... 25.6 1.5 3.1 1.8 1.3 8.1

 16 hours a Week or More .......................... 10.0 0.6 1.5 0.8 0.6 14.2

 Personal Use Only .................................. 4.8 0.2 0.6 0.5 0.3 16.2

 Business Use Only .................................. 2.1 0.1 0.4 0.1 Q 27.1

 Both Personal and Business ................... 3.1 0.3 0.5 0.2 0.3 24.8

 Business Use of PC

 Other Business Use .................................. 3.1 0.2 0.4 Q 0.3 28.2

 Used for Telecommuting ........................... 2.1 0.2 0.5 0.2 Q 22.3

 1 to 4 Days per Week .............................. 1.1 0.1 0.3 Q Q 27.4

 5 to 7 Days per Week .............................. 1.0 Q 0.2 Q Q 28.7

Other Office Equipment

 Cordless Telephone .................................... 62.3 4.1 6.8 4.2 3.8 2.9

 Facsimile Machine ....................................... 6.3 0.5 1.2 0.3 0.3 13.6

 Photocopier ................................................. 3.8 0.3 0.5 0.3 0.2 17.0

 Telephone Answering Machine ................... 59.3 4.1 6.8 3.8 3.5 4.2

NF = No applicable RSE row factor.

Q = Data withheld either because the Relative Standard Error (RSE) was greater than 50 percent or fewer than 10 households were sampled.

Notes: • To obtain the RSE percentage for any table cell, multiply the corresponding column and row factors. • Because of rounding, data may not sum to totals. 

• See "Glossary" for definition of terms used in this report.

Source: Energy Information Administration, Office of Energy Markets and End Use, Forms EIA-457 A, B, C of the 1997 Residential Energy Consumption Survey.

Energy Information Administration/Housing Characteristics 1997

Table Layout at 3:15:25 PM on 11/11/99
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
     COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR PERIOD ENDED MAY 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
     ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
                        
                        
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-START>                  MAR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    MAY-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                        1
<CASH>                           396,540
<SECURITIES>                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                 25,337,481
<ALLOWANCES>                     439,000
<INVENTORY>                   19,545,676
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              46,497,027
<PP&E>                        12,817,718
<DEPRECIATION>                 3,037,354
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                58,555,835
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         16,010,896
<BONDS>                       16,750,639
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0
<PREFERRED>                            0
<COMMON>                          57,600
<OTHER-SE>                    34,606,700     
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  58,555,835
<SALES>                       26,007,262
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              26,007,262
<CGS>                         19,050,049
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 19,050,049
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               250,542
<INCOME-PRETAX>                2,857,686
<INCOME-TAX>                     996,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            1,861,686
<DISCONTINUED>                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0
<CHANGES>                              0
<NET-INCOME>                   1,861,686
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        .32
<EPS-DILUTED>                        .32
        


</TABLE>
#### State v. Glass

105,565

07/30/13

Denied.

Unpublished
##### 



AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO
LICENSE, DEVELOPMENT AND COOPERATION AGREEMENT
 Amendment No. 1 Amendment Effective Date Agreement Gen-Probe DiagnoCure
 Recitals
  in vitro
  Agreement
   in vivo  Licensed In Vivo Products in vitro in vitro
 in vitro
 1




---



##### 



Licensed In Vitro FISH
Products in situ in vitro In Vitro In Vitro In Vitro In Vitro
 In Vivo In Vitro In Vitro mutatis mutandis In Vivo
   2




---



##### 



in vitro PCA3 PMA Application
    3




---



##### 



GEN-PROBE INCORPORATED
    
    
    
    DIAGNOCURE, INC.By:
    
    /s/ Henry L. Nordhoff
    
    
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Pierre DésyHenry L. Nordhoff
    
    
    
    
    
    Pierre DésyPresident & Chief Executive Officer
    
    
    
    
    
    President & Chief Executive OfficerDate: May 24, 2006
    
    
    
    
    
    Date: May 24, 2006
 4
# C_2019057EN.01000102.xml

| 13.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 57/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 57/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9170 — EPIC SNCF Mobilités/Ceetrus/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 57/02)

On 28 January 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9170. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9170. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
# Table 5.5

# RSE 5.5

# Microsoft_Word_Document1.docx

# image1.emf

# Microsoft_Word_Document2.docx

# image2.emf
June 11,2015 U.S. Department ofTransportation Docket Operations West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590 RE: Application for Amendment to Exemption No. 11553, Victory ImprovementProfessionals FAA Docket 2015-0376 Dear Sir or Madam, On May 12, 2015, Victory Improvement Professionals was granted an exemptionrequestunder Section 333. The request included only the DJI Phantom 2 as an approved UAS. We are requesting an Amendment to that exemption to include the DJI Phantom 3 as an additional approved UAS. The newPhantom 3 has additional safety factors built into this new UAS that makes it saferto fly and for the public in general. The size and flight capabilities ofthe Phantom 3 are similar enough in nature to be considered the same as the approved Phantom 2 however; the Phantom 3 has updated sensors and GPS to make for a saferUAS. We believe this request to be a minor change to our current exemption and approving the requested Amendment complies with the intent ofSection 333 ofthe FAAmodernization and Reform Act of2012.

Jay C Gray President



### 1351 Deloss St., Indianapolis, IN 46203 o 

### www.viproofs.com o 

### P:(317) 964-0535 o 

### F:(317) 686-1069
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2019425EN.01000201.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 18.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 425/2 |

---

OPINION OF THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK

of 11 December 2019

on a Council recommendation on the appointment of a member of the Executive Board of the European Central Bank

(CON/2019/43)

(2019/C 425/02)

Introduction and legal basis

On 15 November 2019 the European Central Bank (ECB) received a request from the President of the European Council for an opinion on Council Recommendation of 8 November 2019 on the appointment of a member of the Executive Board of the European Central Bank [(1)](#ntr1-C_2019425EN.01000201-E0001).

The competence of the ECB’s Governing Council to deliver an opinion is based on Article 283(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

General observations

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 1. | The Council’s recommendation, which was submitted to the European Council and on which the European Parliament and the ECB’s Governing Council are being consulted, recommends that Isabel SCHNABEL be appointed as a member of the ECB’s Executive Board for a term of office of eight years with effect from 1 January 2020. |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 2. | The ECB’s Governing Council is of the opinion that the proposed candidate is a person of recognised standing and professional experience in monetary or banking matters as required by Article 283(2) of the Treaty. |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 3. | The ECB’s Governing Council has no objection to the Council’s recommendation to appoint Isabel Schnabel as a member of the ECB’s Executive Board. |

Done at Frankfurt am Main, 11 December 2019.

The President of the ECB

Christine LAGARDE

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2019425EN.01000201-E0001)  [OJ C 385, 13.11.2019, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2019_385_R_TOC).

---
#### State ex *rel.*Secretary of SRS v. Lane

107,971

08/30/13

Denied.

Unpublished
Exhibit 4.2


 


Consent of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm


We have issued our report
dated July 8, 2021, with respect to the financial statement of Advisors Disciplined Trust 2077 contained in Amendment No. 1 to the Registration
Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-255281) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in the Registration
Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Experts”.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


July 8, 2021
# C_2018439EN.01001001.xml

| 6.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 439/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.12.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 439/10

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2018/C 439/07)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

| Date and time of closure | 6.10.2018 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 6.10.2018 – 31.12.2018 |
| Member State | Belgium |
| Stock or Group of stocks | HKE/8ABDE. including HKE/*57-14 |
| Species | Hake (Merluccius merluccius) |
| Zone | 8a, 8b, 8d and 8e |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 36/TQ120 |

Date and time of closure

6.10.2018

Duration

6.10.2018 – 31.12.2018

Member State

Belgium

Stock or Group of stocks

HKE/8ABDE. including HKE/*57-14

Species

Hake (Merluccius merluccius)

Zone

8a, 8b, 8d and 8e

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

36/TQ120

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1

---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 61 (Monday, March 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 15174]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-8009]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Notice of Application Tendered for Filing With the Commission

March 25, 1997.
    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been 
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection:
    a. Type of Application: Original Minor License.
    b. Project No.: 1986-005.
    c. Date filed: February 28, 1997.
    d. Applicant: Douglas W. Pegar.
    e. Name of Project: Rock Creek Historic Hydro-electric Power Plant.
    f. Location: On Rock Creek, a tributary of the Powder River, near 
Haines in Baker County, Oregon; on lands within the Wallowa-Whitman 
National Forest.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act 16 USC Secs. 791(a)-825(r).
    h. Applicant Contact: Douglas W. Pegar, 540 E. 1st Street, 
Gladstone, OR 97027, (503) 657-1076.
    i. FERC Contact: Gordon Warren at (202) 219-2836.
    j. Comment Date: 60 days from the filing date in paragraph c.
    k. Brief Description of Project: The existing project consists of: 
(1) a concrete diversion structure on Rock Creek; (2) a 8,500 foot-long 
wooden timber flume; (3) a forebay pond; (4) a 2,700 foot-long steel 
penstock; (5) a wooden powerhouse; (6) two turbine generator units, 
each with a capacity of 400 KW; and (7) other appurtenances.
    l. With this notice, we are initiating consultation with the OREGON 
STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER (SHPO), as required by Sec. 106, 
National Historic Preservation Act, and the regulations of the Advisory 
Council on Historic Preservation, 36 CFR, at 800.4.
    m. Under Section 4.32(b)(7) of the Commission's regulations (18 
CFR), if any resource agency, Indian Tribe, or person believes that the 
applicant should conduct an additional scientific study to form an 
adequate factual basis for a complete analysis of the application on 
its merits, they must file a request for the study with the Commission, 
not later than 60 days after the application is filed, and must serve a 
copy of the request on the applicant.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-8009 Filed 3-28-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
U.S. Energy Information Administration Quarterly Coal Report, October - December 2023

Table 20. Coal imports by customs district

(short tons)

Year to date

Customs district October - December

2023

July - September

2023

October - December

2022 2023 2022

Percent

change

Eastern Total 14 20 57 47,042 48,047 -2.1

Boston, MA - - - - 402 -

Buffalo, NY 14 - 36 119 263 -54.8

Portland, ME - - - 46,903 47,340 -0.9

St. Albans, VT - 20 21 20 42 -52.4

Southern Total 738,386 763,434 1,055,264 3,140,436 4,339,173 -27.6

Houston-Galveston, TX 42,479 24,514 - 98,935 6,520 NM

Laredo, TX 172 188 7,092 3,238 7,764 -58.3

Miami, FL 70 - - 277 244 13.5

Mobile, AL 497,699 226,164 670,933 1,477,176 2,357,667 -37.3

New Orleans, LA 4,336 90,120 124,678 219,910 279,960 -21.4

San Juan, PR 193,630 389,676 177,243 1,238,520 1,430,309 -13.4

Tampa, FL - 32,772 75,318 102,380 256,709 -60.1

Western Total 118,613 129,839 185,191 468,452 1,535,073 -69.5

Great Falls, MT 116,397 129,109 184,148 463,675 1,278,747 -63.7

Honolulu, HI - - - - 252,993 -

San Francisco, CA - - - 3 - -

Seattle, WA 2,216 730 1,043 4,774 3,333 43.2

Northern Total 124,252 101,128 144,788 354,246 391,174 -9.4

Chicago, IL 23,627 2,429 - 31,232 30,355 2.9

Cleveland, OH 1,614 - - 1,686 9 NM

Detroit, MI 83,890 87,066 131,822 257,964 293,656 -12.2

Duluth, MN 1,675 837 528 5,704 2,204 158.8

Pembina, ND 13,446 10,796 12,438 57,658 64,950 -11.2

St. Louis, MO - - - 2 - -

Total 981,265 994,421 1,385,300 4,010,176 6,313,467 -36.5

- = No data reported.

NM = Not meaningful due to changes of 500 percent or more.

Note: Coal imports include coal to Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. Total may not equal sum of components because of independent rounding.

Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, 'Monthly Report IM 145.'
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 71 (Monday, April 14, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 18100]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-9480]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force


HQ USAF Scientific Advisory Board Meeting

    The 1997 Summer Study Panel Meeting on Command, Control and 
Information, of the HQ USAF Scientific Advisory Board will meet on May 
7, 1997 at the Pentagon, Washington, DC from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    The purpose of the meeting is to gather information and receive 
briefing for the 1997 Summer Study topic on Expeditionary Forces.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with Section 
552b of Title 5, United States Code, specifically subparagraphs (1) and 
(4) thereof.
    For further information, contact the HQ USAF Scientific Advisory 
Board Secretariat at (703) 697-8404.
Carolyn A. Lunsford,
Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-9480 Filed 4-11-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3910-01-P
June 10, 2015

Mr. San Thach

Dear Mr. Thach:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your May 18, 2015, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015- 1604), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the Trustee of Marine Petroleum Trust does hereby certify, to such persons knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013 (the Form 10-Q) of Marine Petroleum Trust fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Marine Petroleum Trust as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.



|                                                                                                                                                                                               
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Ron E. Hooper                                                                                                                                                                              
|Ron E. Hooper                                                                                                                                                                                  
|Senior Vice President Royalty Management on behalf of U.S. Trust, Bank of America Private Wealth Management, not in its individual capacity but solely as the Trustee of Marine
Petroleum Trust
|                                                                                                                                                                                               
|Dated: May 10, 2013                                                                                                                                                                            

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Marine Petroleum Trust and
will be retained by Marine Petroleum Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing
certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title
18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of Marine Petroleum Trust,
whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.