alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
================================================================================

Exhibit 32.1

          CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
                     OFFICER OF SPARTA SURGICAL CORPORATION
               FORM 10-QSB FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MAY 31, 2006
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES -OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I am the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Sparta Surgical
Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company". I am delivering this
certificate in connection with the Form 10-QSB of the Company for the three
months ended May 31, 2006 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
("Form 10-QSB").

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
the Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respect, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: June 29,2006                             /s/ Allan J. Korn
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Allan J. Korn
                                               Chief Executive Officer
                                               Chief Financial Officer






















--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# C_2018046EN.01000101.xml

| 8.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 46/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/1

---

Notice for the attention of persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2013/255/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria

(2018/C 46/01)

The following information is brought to the attention of Mr Ali Ayyub (No 56), Mr Fahd Jasim (No 57), Mr Mohammed Ramez Tourjman (No 221) and Mr Ahmad al-Hamu (No 227), the persons appearing in Annex I to Council Decision 2013/255/CFSP (1) and in Annex II to Council Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 (2) concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria.

1

2

The Council intends to amend the statements of reasons of the abovementioned persons. Those persons are hereby informed that they may submit a request to the Council to obtain the intended statement of reasons before 12 February 2018, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

---

(1)  OJ L 147, 1.6.2013, p. 14.

1

(2)  OJ L 16, 19.1.2012, p. 1.

2

---
#### *In re*S.R.M.

107,398

04/18/13

Denied.

Unpublished
# Table 10.15

# RSE 10.15
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,841,135
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  290,099
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,222,656
<PP&E>                                             562
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,556,163
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          461,652
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             8
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,094,503
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,556,163
<SALES>                                      2,161,149
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,503,885
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               141,225
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,362,659
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,358,459
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,358,459
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.18


</TABLE>
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 16 

Designating the week of February 2 through February 6, 2009, as ‘‘National 

School Counseling Week’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 16, 2009 

Mrs. MURRAY (for herself and Ms. COLLINS) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating the week of February 2 through February 6, 

2009, as ‘‘National School Counseling Week’’. 

Whereas the American School Counselor Association has declared the week of February 2 through February 6, 

2009, as ‘‘National School Counseling Week’’; 

Whereas the Senate has recognized the importance of school 

counseling through the inclusion of elementary and secondary school counseling programs in the reauthorization 

of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965; 

Whereas school counselors have long advocated that the education system of the United States must leave no child 

behind and must provide opportunities for every student; 

Whereas personal and social growth results in increased academic achievement; 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 16 ATS 

Whereas school counselors help develop well-rounded students 

by guiding them through their academic, personal, social, 

and career development; 

Whereas students face myriad challenges every day, including 

peer pressure, depression, the deployment of family members to serve in conflicts overseas, and school violence; 

Whereas school counselors are among the few professionals in 

a school building who are trained in both education and 

mental health matters; 

Whereas the roles and responsibilities of school counselors are 

often misunderstood, and the school counselor position is 

often among the first to be eliminated in order to meet 

budgetary constraints; 

Whereas the national average ratio of students to school 

counselors of 476-to-1 is almost twice the 250-to-1 ratio 

recommended by the American School Counselor Association, the American Counseling Association, the American 

Medical Association, the American Psychological Association, and other organizations; and 

Whereas the celebration of National School Counseling Week 

would increase awareness of the important and necessary 

role school counselors play in the lives of students in the 

United States: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates the week of February 2 through 

3 February 6, 2009, as ‘‘National School Counseling 

4 Week’’; and 

5 (2) encourages the people of the United States 

6 to observe the week with appropriate ceremonies and 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
3 

•SRES 16 ATS 

1 activities that promote awareness of the role school 

2 counselors perform in the school and the community 

3 at large in preparing students for fulfilling lives as 

4 contributing members of society. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         147,241
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,334,286
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (61,318)
<INVENTORY>                                  2,132,452
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,955,152
<PP&E>                                       6,542,664
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,489,507
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,587,056
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,327,987
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        36,792
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,121,880
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,158,672
<SALES>                                      2,429,112
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                        1,436,231
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               763,205
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   110,538
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    61,169
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 62 (Tuesday, April 1, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15475-15476]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-8149]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP97-3-004]


Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation; Notice of Compliance 
Filing

March 26, 1997.
    Take notice that on March 24, 1997, Texas Eastern Transmission 
Corporation (Texas Eastern) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Sixth Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets to be 
effective April 1, 1997:

Sub Fourth Revised Sheet No. 464
Sub First Revised Sheet No. 464A
Sub First Revised Sheet No. 490
Sub First Revised Sheet No. 594
Sub Second Revised Sheet No. 595


[[Page 15476]]


    Texas Eastern asserts that the purpose of this filing is to comply 
with the Commission's Order on Rehearing and on Second Compliance 
Filing, issued March 13, 1997 in Docket Nos. RP97-3-001, RP97-3-002, 
and RP97-3-003.
    Texas Eastern states that copies of this filing were served on firm 
customers of Texas Eastern, interested state commissions, current 
interruptible customers and all parties on the service list.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-8149 Filed 3-31-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 12-5629.

#### Wainwright *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# 2005
# Table 7.6

# RSE 7.6

# Microsoft_Word_Document1.docx

# image1.emf

# Microsoft_Word_Document2.docx

# image2.emf
# C_2019190EN.01005301.xml

| 5.6.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 190/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.6.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 190/53

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on ‘Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 508/2014 as regards certain rules relating to the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund by reason of the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the Union’

(COM(2019) 48 final — 2019/0009 (COD))

(2019/C 190/10)

| Referral | European Parliament, 30.1.2019
  Council of the European Union, 6.2.2019 |
| --- | --- |
| Legal basis | Articles 43(2) and 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union |
| Section responsible | Section for Agriculture, Rural Development and the Environment |
| Adopted at plenary session | 20.2.2019 |
| Plenary session No | 541 |
| Outcome of vote
  (for/against/abstentions) | 159/0/2 |

Referral

European Parliament, 30.1.2019

Council of the European Union, 6.2.2019

Legal basis

Articles 43(2) and 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Section responsible

Section for Agriculture, Rural Development and the Environment

Adopted at plenary session

20.2.2019

Plenary session No

541

Outcome of vote

(for/against/abstentions)

159/0/2

Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 541st plenary session of 20 and 21 February 2019 (meeting of 20 February), by 159 votes to 0 with 2 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Brussels, 20 February 2019.

The President

of the European Economic and Social Committee

Luca JAHIER

---
No. 11-10668.

#### Hall v. New York.

App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 1st Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.
# C_2018269EN.01001301.xml

| 31.7.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/13

---

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions at its meeting on 19 January 2018 concerning the draft decision relating to Case AT.40220 — Qualcomm (Exclusivity Payments)

Rapporteur: Austria

(2018/C 269/13)

1.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the relevant product market is the worldwide merchant market of LTE chipsets as defined in the draft decision.

2.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that Qualcomm held a dominant position in the worldwide market for LTE chipsets between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2016.

3.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the payments granted by Qualcomm to Apple as described in the draft decision were exclusivity payments.

4.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission's analysis of the capability of Qualcomm’s exclusivity payments to have anti-competitive effects and with the Commission's conclusion that these exclusivity payments constitute an abuse of a dominant position.

5.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that Qualcomm has not demonstrated that its exclusivity payments were counterbalanced or outweighed by advantages in terms of efficiency that also benefit the consumer.

6.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission's assessment as regards the duration of the infringement as described in the draft decision.

7.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that it has jurisdiction to apply Article 102 TFEU and Article 54 EEA in the present case.

8.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the conduct covered by the draft decision has an appreciable effect on trade between Member States and between the Contracting Parties within the meaning of Article 102 TFEU and Article 54 EEA.

9.

The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union.

---
#### State v. Janzen

107,886

10/28/13

Denied.

Unpublished
No. 12-5972.

#### Spigner *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 12-115.

#### Maggiore *v.*Connecticut.

App. Ct. Conn. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000820474
<NAME> OPTIMUM CARE CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         102,005
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,775,975
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,906,174
<PP&E>                                          22,501
<DEPRECIATION>                                  37,336
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,260,741
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          473,367
<BONDS>                                        240,334
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,964
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,953,054
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,260,741
<SALES>                                      2,220,445
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,222,007
<CGS>                                        1,935,925
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,207,473
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,717
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,534
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,534
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,534
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FE BRUARY 1 7 , 2017

NO. 03

- 16

- 00556

- CV

In the Matter of J. G. S.

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF HAYS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND BOURLAND

VACA TED AND REMANDED ON REHEARING

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE BOURLAND

This is an appeal from the order signed by the tr i a l court on August 12, 2016. T he Court’s

opinion and judgment dated February 10, 201 7 , are withdrawn

. Having reviewed the record and

the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was reversible error in the juvenile court’s

transfer order

. Therefore, the Cour t vacates the juvenile court’s transfer order and remand s this

case to the juvenile court for further proceedings consistent with the Court’s opinion . The

appellee shall pay a ll costs relating to this appeal, both in th is Court and in the court below.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 29 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 29

    To limit consideration of amendments under a budget resolution.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 5, 2009

 Mr. Specter submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                      the Committee on the Budget

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    To limit consideration of amendments under a budget resolution.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENTS UNDER A BUDGET 
              RESOLUTION.

    For purposes of consideration of any budget resolution reported 
under section 305(b) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974--
            (1) time on a budget resolution may only be yielded back by 
        consent;
            (2) no first degree amendment may be proposed after the 
        10th hour of debate on a budget resolution unless it has been 
        submitted to the Journal Clerk prior to the expiration of the 
        10th hour;
            (3) no second degree amendment may be proposed after the 
        20th hour of debate on a budget resolution unless it has been 
        submitted to the Journal Clerk prior to the expiration of the 
        20th hour;
            (4) after not more than 40 hours of debate on a budget 
        resolution, the resolution shall be set aside for 1 calendar 
        day, so that all filed amendments are printed and made 
        available in the Congressional Record before debate on the 
        resolution continues; and
            (5) provisions contained in a budget resolution, or 
        amendments to that resolution, shall not include programmatic 
        detail not within the jurisdiction of the Senate Committee on 
        the Budget.

SEC. 2. WAIVER AND APPEAL.

    Section 1 may be waived or suspended in the Senate only by an 
affirmative vote of three-fifths of the Members, duly chosen and sworn. 
An affirmative vote of three-fifths of the Members of the Senate, duly 
chosen and sworn, shall be required in the Senate to sustain an appeal 
of the ruling of the Chair on a point of order raised under section 1.
                                 <all>
```
#### Brazell v. Furmanite America, Inc.

110,477

08/20/2015

Denied.

Unpublished
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 DATE: August 7, 2007
    By:
    /s/ Henry L. NordhoffHenry L. NordhoffChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
#### State v. Butler

106,501

11/22/13

Denied

Unpublished