alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
The St. Lawrence Seaway Corporation Annual Report "Form 10-K" (Exhibit 10(v)(b))



                                                                                    Exhibit 10(v)(b)



                                 AMENDMENT TO STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT


         On September 21, 1987, The St. Lawrence Seaway Corporation (the "Corporation") entered into
a Restated  Stock Option  Agreement  (the "Stock  Option  Agreement")  with Jack C. Brown  ("Brown")
pursuant to which Brown was granted  options to  purchase an  aggregate  of 15,000  shares of common
stock,  $1.00 par value, of the Corporation for $3.00 per share over a period of five (5) years. The
Board of Directors and  Stockholders  of the  Corporation  approved an amendment to the Stock Option
Agreement on July 6, 1992 and August 28, 1992,  respectively,  the effect of which was to extend the
option  exercise  period for five (5)  additional  years.  The Board of Directors  approved  further
amendments to the Stock Option Agreement on September 8, 1997, the effect of which was to extend the
option  exercise  period for five (5)  additional  years.  The Board of Directors  approved  further
amendments  to the Stock  Option  Agreement on August 30,  2002,  and  extended the options  through
September 21, 2007. Specifically,  Section 7 of the Stock Option Agreement is hereby further amended
by substituting the words "twentieth anniversary" for the words "fifteenth anniversary," and Section
3 is hereby further amended by substituting the words "twenty years" for "fifteen years."

         The Stock Option Agreement and the options granted pursuant thereto are hereby specifically
referred  to and  incorporated  as a part  hereof and in all  respects  other  than as  specifically
modified herein, the terms and conditions thereof shall continue in full force and effect.

         This Amendment is executed on this 20th day of September, 2002.


                                                                 THE ST. LAWRENCE SEAWAY CORPORATION


                                                                 By:      /s/ Daniel L. Nir
                                                                    --------------------------------
                                                                    Daniel L. Nir
                                                                    President and Treasurer


Accepted as of September 20, 2002


/s/ Jack C. Brown
----------------------------------
Jack C. Brown
Exhibit 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Micronetics, Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ended  June  30,
2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date  hereof (the "Report"), David Robbins, President  and  Chief
Executive Officer of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act  of
1934; and

           (2)   The  information contained in the Report  fairly
presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition  and
result of operations of the Company.




August 15, 2005             /s/David Robbins
                            ------------------------------------
                            Name:  David Robbins
                            Title: Chief Executive Officer
                                   (Principal Executive Officer)



      This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to
Section  906  of  the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and  shall  not,
except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of  2002,
be  deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
# monthprod1988
**EXHIBIT 21**

|SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY           | PLACE OF INCORPORATION
|------------------------------------- | ----------------------
|Associated Memorials, Inc.            | Vermont               
|Autumn Rose Quarry, Inc.              | Georgia               
|Carolina Quarries, Inc.               | Delaware              
|Kabushiki Kaisha Rock of Ages Asia    | Japan                 
|Keith Monument Company LLC            | Delaware              
|Pennsylvania Granite Corporation      | Pennsylvania          
|Rock of Ages Canada, Inc.             | Canada                
|Rock of Ages International Corp.      | Japan                 
|Rock of Ages International, Ltd.      | Virgin Islands        
|Rock of Ages Kentucky Cemeteries, LLC | Delaware              
|Rock of Ages Memorials, Inc.          | Delaware              
|Sioux Falls Monument Co.              | South Dakota          
|                                      |
#### State v. Oliver

109,224

02/13/14

Denied.

Unpublished
#### Cottrell v. Keystone Grazing Association

110,649

09/24/2015

Denied.

Unpublished
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**VINCENT C. MCGEE,**

**Petitioner**

**v.**

**JOHN E. WETZEL, SECRETARY OF CORRECTIONS; STACY P. MILLER,**  **ESQ.; CENTRE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE,** 

**Respondents :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 147 MM 2015** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 17th day of November, 2015, the Application f or Leave to File** 

**Original Process is** GRANTED **, and the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is** DENIED

**.**
<PAGE>


                                                                     Exhibit 4.3


        VODAFONE GROUP PLC              VODAFONE HOLDINGS (JERSEY) LIMITED
          The Courtyard                            P.O. Box 404
         2-4 London Road                        Whiteley Chambers
        Newbury, Berkshire                    Don Street, St Helier
         RG14 1JX England                         JE4 9WG Jersey


China Mobile (Hong Kong) Limited
60th Floor, The Center
99 Queen's Road Central
Hong Kong

                                                                    18 June 2002

Dear Sirs,

NAME OF THE ALLOTTEE FOR THE NEW SHARES IN CHINA MOBILE (HONG KONG) LIMITED TO
BE ISSUED UPON COMPLETION OF THE VODAFONE SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT.

We refer to the subscription agreement (the "VODAFONE SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT")
dated 16 May 2002 and entered into between China Mobile (Hong Kong) Limited,
Vodafone Group Plc and Vodafone Holdings (Jersey) Limited. Terms used in the
Vodafone Subscription Agreement shall have the same meanings in this letter.

Notwithstanding the terms of clause 4.3(c) of the Vodafone Subscription
Agreement, each of Vodafone Group Plc and Vodafone Holdings (Jersey) Limited
hereby confirms that at Completion:

(a)  the allotment of the New Shares to, and the issue of a share certificate
     in respect of the New Shares in the name of, Vodafone Holdings (Jersey)
     Limited;

(b)  the registration of Vodafone Holdings (Jersey) Limited as a member of
     China Mobile (Hong Kong) Limited in its register of members in respect of
     the New Shares; and

(c)  the delivery to Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer of the share certificate
     referred to in paragraph (a) and a copy of the list of top ten shareholders
     of China Mobile (Hong Kong) Limited reflecting the registration referred to
     in paragraph (b),

shall constitute full and effective discharge of the obligations of China Mobile
(Hong Kong) Limited under clause 4.3(c) of the Vodafone Subscription Agreement.



Your faithfully

/s/ Stephen Scott                             /s/ John Alcock
-----------------------------------           ----------------------------------
Vodafone Group Plc                            Vodafone Holdings (Jersey) Limited
Name: Stephen Scott                           Name: John Alcock
Designation: Company Secretary                Designation: Director




Acknowledged and Agreed


/s/ Li Zhenqun
------------------------------------
China Mobile (Hong Kong) Limited
Name: Li Zhenqun
Designation: Vice Chairman and
             Chief Operating Officer
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-60348 Conference Calendar

__________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus TOMMY HARRIS, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 1:94CR106-S

- - - - - - - - - - March 1, 1996 Before GARWOOD, JONES, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Tommy Harris appeals his sentence, arguing that it was "excessive, unfair, and plainly unreasonable" for the district court to depart upwardly from the recommended guideline range based on his prior criminal record, when that criminal record was used to 1) determine the crime itself, possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, 2) establish his base offense level under U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(a), and 3) calculate his criminal history category under § 4A1.1. Harris's argument is unavailing. TheNo. 95-60348 -2- Sentencing Guidelines permit consideration of Harris's prior felony convictions in calculating both his offense level and criminal history category. See United States v. Hawkins , 69 F.3d 11, 13-15 (5th Cir. 1995), petition for cert. filed , (U.S. Jan. 30, 1996) (No. 95-7703). The district court's decision to impose a sentence in excess of the recommended guideline range was warranted based on Harris's egregious criminal history. See United States v. Laury , 985 F.2d 1293, 1310-11 (5th Cir. 1993).
AFFIRMED.
Exhibit
31.4



CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT
TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I,
Maria Ek, certify that:



1.
I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of Neonode Inc.; and



2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report.



|Date:
    April 29, 2020 | /s/
    Maria Ek                                                                
|------------------------ | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                         | Maria
    Ek                                                                    
|                         | Chief
    Financial Officer, Vice President,
    Finance Treasurer and Secretary
#### Quillen v. Sullivan

109,790

07/24/2015

Denied. ,.

Unpublished
Exhibits
**Exhibit 23.7**
**Consent of Registered Independent PublicAccountants**We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8(No. 333-7410, 333-7412, 333-11022, 333-13384, 333-102183and 333-97935) of Royal Dutch Petroleum Company and The“Shell” Transport and Trading Company, Public LimitedCompany of our report dated May 22, 2004, exceptNote 32(b) (Second Restatement of previously issuedfinancial statements), as to which the date is March 3,2005 relating to the Netherlands GAAP Financial Statements ofthe Royal Dutch/Shell Group of Companies which is included inthis Amendment No. 2 to the 2003 Annual Report onForm 20-F.
/s/ KPMG Accountants N.V.---------------------------------------------------------------
**KPMG Accountants N.V.****The Hague — TheNetherland.**
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP---------------------------------------------------------------
**PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP****London — The UnitedKingdom.**
March 3, 2005 **E 8 **RoyalDutch/Shell Group of Companies 20-F/A (Amendment No. 2) 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                             
<ARTICLE>                                                      CT
<LEGEND>                                           
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
financial statements, schedules and other disclosure contained in
Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 1997 of B. F. Saul Real
Estate Investment Trust and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements, schedules and other disclosure.
</LEGEND>                                    
<MULTIPLIER>                                                 1000
                                                   
<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                               SEP-30-1997
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                            6357986
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         516
<PREFERRED>                                                     0
<COMMON>                                                     6642
<OTHER-SE>                                                 (91943)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                              6357986
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                                12810
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                         48384
<DISCONTINUED>                                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                 0
<CHANGES>                                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                                18860
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                   2.78
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                   2.78
        

</TABLE>
#### State v. Hagan

106,338

09/04/13

Denied.

Unpublished
# C_2019188EN.01000101.xml

| 4.6.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 188/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.6.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 188/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9339 — Kennedy Wilson/AXA/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 188/01)

On 22 May 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9339. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9339. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23
                                                                      ----------

[Letter Head]

The Board of Directors
Rubbermaid Incorporated:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (File
Nos. 33-63420, 33-56105, and 33-61817) on Form S-8, and in the registration
statement (File No. 33-00471) on Form S-3 of Rubbermaid Incorporated of our
report dated January 31, 1997, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
Rubbermaid Incorporated and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and
the related consolidated statements of earnings, cash flows, and shareholders'
equity for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1996,
which report appears in the December 31, 1996 annual report on Form 10-K of
Rubbermaid Incorporated.

/s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Cleveland, Ohio
March 24, 1997
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

THERESE C. MASSON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

SELENE FINANCE, LP, US BANK TRUST 

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION (as Trustee for SRMOF 

REO 2011-1 Trust), SELENE RMOF LLC (Sole Certificate Holder of SRMOF 2009-1 Trust), AND 

SELENE RMOF REO ACQUISITION LLC,

Defendants-Appellees.

______________________ 

2013-1447

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Northern District of California in No. 12-CV-5335, Judge 

Samuel Conti.

______________________ 

Before NEWMAN, PROST, and REYNA, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM. 

O R D E R

This court considers whether this appeal should be 

dismissed. 

Therese Masson appeals from the judgment of the 

United States District Court for the Northern District of 

California dismissing her claim under the Federal Fair 

Case: 13-1447 Document: 3 Page: 1 Filed: 11/22/2013
2 MASSON v. SELENE FINANCE, LP

Debt Collection Practice Act. Her appeal was docketed at 

this court and the United States Court of Appeals for the

Ninth Circuit.

On July 1, 2013, this court issued an order informing 

the parties that this court did not have jurisdiction over 

Masson’s appeal and directed the parties to respond as to 

whether the appeal should be dismissed in light of the 

fact that it was already properly docketed in the Ninth 

Circuit. Having received no response to this court’s July 

1, 2013 order, the court now dismisses the appeal. 

Accordingly, 

 IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

(1) The appeal is dismissed. 

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs. 

 FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Daniel E. O’Toole

 Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: November 22, 2013

s19

Case: 13-1447 Document: 3 Page: 2 Filed: 11/22/2013
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET,  INCOME  STATEMENT  AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
10QSB.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                               AUG-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                 APR-30-1998
<CASH>                                            17,711
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    183,695
<ALLOWANCES>                                      15,000
<INVENTORY>                                       47,541
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 283,400
<PP&E>                                           885,239
<DEPRECIATION>                                   641,592
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   527,047
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,534,802
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                        4,856
<COMMON>                                           9,270
<OTHER-SE>                                   (1,021,881)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           0
<SALES>                                          487,431
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 487,431
<CGS>                                            433,936
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    508,160
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                29,800
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (50,529)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (50,529)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (50,529)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (0.01)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906

of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Safeco Corporation (the Company) on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-K), I, Christine B. Mead, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



(2) The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: March 3,
2005



/s/ CHRISTINE B. MEADChristine B. MeadExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to Safeco Corporation and will be retained by Safeco Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
FILED

October 12, 1998

Cecil Crowson, Jr.

Appellate C ourt Clerk

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE

AT JACKSON

(Heard at Memphis)

STATE OF TENNESSEE ) NO. 02S01-9711-CR-00094

)

Appellee )

)

v. ) SHELBY COUNTY

)

DEWAYNE B. BUTLER, )

FREDRICK D. BUTLER, and )

ERIC D. ALEXANDER ) (Interlocutory Appeal)

)

Appellants. )

) AFFIRMED

ORDER SUBSTITUTING OPINION AND JUDGMENT

It appearing to the Court that the original opinion in this case, filed

September 14, 1998, inadvertently stated that mitigating circumstances must be

proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Such a burden of proof is not required by the

provisions of Tennessee Code Annotated Sections 39-13-204(e)(1) and 39-13-207(d). 

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the

attached opinion and judgment be, and the same hereby is, substituted for the opinion

and judgment previously filed in this cause on September 14, 1998, without the further

taxing of costs.

PER CURIAM