alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
MATEC Corporation and Subsidiaries                            Exhibit 11
Calculation of Earnings Per Share
(amounts in thousands, except per share data)

                                                    Years Ended December 31,
                                                    1996      1995      1994
                                                  -------   -------   -------
Net earnings (loss) ...........................   $   (76)  $   303   $  (114)
                                                  =======   =======   =======

CALCULATION OF PRIMARY EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE:
 Weighted average common shares outstanding ....    2,767     2,765     2,765
 Increase from assumed exercise of stock options
  and investment of proceeds in treasury stock,
  based upon average market prices (A) .........        -        30         -
 Increase from assumed exercise of warrants and
  investment of proceeds in treasury stock,
  based upon average market prices (A)(B) ......        -         -         -
                                                    -----     -----     -----
 Average common stock and common equivalent
  shares outstanding ...........................    2,767     2,795     2,765
                                                    =====     =====     =====
  
 Net earnings (loss) per common and common
  equivalent share (C) .........................    $(.03)    $ .11     $(.04)
                                                    =====     =====     =====


CALCULATION OF FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE:
 Weighted average common shares outstanding ....    2,767     2,765     2,765
 Increase from assumed exercise of stock options
  and investment of proceeds in treasury stock,
  based upon the higher of average or 
  quarter-end market prices ....................       41        33        28
 Increase from assumed exercise of warrants and
  investment of proceeds in treasury stock,
  based upon the higher of average or
  quarter-end market prices (B) ................        4         -         -
                                                    -----     -----     -----
 Average common stock and common equivalent
  shares outstanding ...........................    2,812     2,798     2,793
                                                    =====     =====     =====
  
 Net earnings (loss) per common and common
  equivalent share assuming full dilution (C) ..    $(.03)    $ .11     $(.04)
                                                    =====     =====     =====

(A) In loss periods, dilutive common equivalent shares are excluded as the 
    effect would be anti-dilutive.
(B) The effect of the outstanding warrants is excluded in 1995 since they do
    not meet either test of paragraph 37 of APB Opinion No. 15.
(C) Dilution from stock options and warrants is less than 3%, therefore primary
    earnings per share is based on the weighted average number of shares
    outstanding.

<PAGE>
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 11

- 1398

_____________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

QUINTRELL REYNOS,

Appellant

( E.D. Pa. No. 0 9

- cr

- 00618

- 002 )

Present: McKEE, Chief Judge , SLOVITER, SCIRICA, RENDELL, AMBRO,

FUENTES

, SMITH, FISHER, CHAGARES, JORDAN, HARDIMAN,

GREENWAY, Jr., and VANASKIE, Circuit Ju d ges

ORDER

Upon further consideration and argument, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED tha t e n

banc consideration was improvidently granted. Accordingly, the opinion and judgment

entered May 22, 2012 for the above captione d case are hereby reinstated.

By the Court

,

/s/ Theodore A. McKee

Chief Judge

Dated : November 21, 2012

trg/cc: Joseph T. Labrum, III, Esq.

R o bert A. Zauzmer, Esq.

Megan S. Scheib, Esq.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, April 24, 2018. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, April 24, 2018 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A18I0154. JOHN FREDRICKSON v. THE STATE. Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 17T04421
No. 12-5635.

#### King *v.*Hedgpeth, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 12-5721.

#### Willoughby *v.*Lindamood, Warden.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 12-5609.

#### Birdette *v.*Associated Recovery Systems et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Morgan v. State

109,099

07/24/2015

Denied. ..

Unpublished
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 70 (Friday, April 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17895-17896]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-9349]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Issuer Delisting; Notice of Application To Withdraw From Listing 
and Registration; (Greif Bros. Corporation, Class A Common Stock, 
Without Par Value) File No. 1-566

April 7, 1997.
    Greif Bros. Corporation (``Company'') has filed an application with 
the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to 
section 12(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') and Rule 
12d2-2(d) promulgated thereunder, to withdraw the above specified 
security (``Security'')

[[Page 17896]]

from listing and registration on the Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc. 
(``CHX'').
    The reasons cited in the application for withdrawing the Security 
from listing and registration include the following:
    The Security of the Company is also listed on and traded through 
the Nasdaq National Market System. The Company wishes to eliminate the 
additional cost associated with having its Security listed and traded 
on two markets. Additionally, because of the low volume of trading in 
the Security on the CHX, the Company does not believe it is necessary 
to maintain its listing on such exchange. The Company has complied with 
the Rules of the CHX by filing an application to delist its Security 
from the CHX.
    Any interested person may, on or before April 28, 1997, submit by 
letter to the Secretary of the Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 
Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549, facts bearing upon whether 
the application has been made in accordance with the rules of the 
exchange and what terms, if any, should be imposed by the Commission 
for the protection of investors. The Commission, based on the 
information submitted to it, will issue an order granting the 
application after the date mentioned above, unless the Commission 
determines to order a hearing on the matter.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
pursuant to delegated authority.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-9349 Filed 4-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 24
                                                                      ----------

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY
                                -----------------

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT, that each of the undersigned Directors of
Rubbermaid Incorporated (the "Registrant"), a corporation organized and existing
under the laws of the State of Ohio, hereby constitute and appoint Wolfgang R.
Schmitt, George C. Weigand and James A. Morgan, and each of them a true and
lawful attorney-in-fact in their name, place and stead with full power of
substitution, to sign, in their name as a Director of the Registrant, the
Registrant's Form 10-K Report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996, which
will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, D.C., and
any and all amendments thereto.

/s/ Tom H. Barrett                            /s/ William D. Marohn
--------------------------------              ---------------------------------
Tom H. Barrett, Director                      William D. Marohn, Director

Date:  February 28, 1997                      Date:  February 28, 1997
       -------------------------                     -----------------


/s/ Charles A. Carroll                        /s/ Steven A. Minter
--------------------------------              ---------------------------------
Charles A. Carroll, Director                  Steven A. Minter, Director

Date:  February 28, 1997                      Date:  February 28, 1997
       -------------------------                     --------------------------


/s/ Robert O. Ebert                           /s/ Jan Nicholson
--------------------------------              ---------------------------------
Robert O. Ebert, Director                     Jan Nicholson, Director

Date:  February 28, 1997                      Date:  February 28, 1997
       -------------------------                     --------------------------


/s/ Robert M. Gerrity                         /s/ Paul G. Schloemer
--------------------------------              ---------------------------------
Robert M. Gerrity, Director                   Paul G. Schloemer, Director

Date:  February 28, 1997                      Date:  February 28, 1997
       -------------------------                     --------------------------


/s/ Karen N. Horn                             /s/ Gordon R. Sullivan
--------------------------------              ---------------------------------
Karen N. Horn, Director                       Gordon R. Sullivan, Director

Date:  February 28, 1997                      Date:  February 28, 1997
       -------------------------                     --------------------------
<PAGE>


    As filed with Securities and Exchange Commission on March 04, 1997
==============================================================================

                  SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                       Washington, D.C. 20549

                    AMENDMENT #1 TO FORM 10-QSB/A

(Mark One)
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
    EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
    EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

               For the Quarter Ended August 31, 1996

                  Commission file number 0-28506


                AMERICAN DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
     (Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)

              Wyoming                               13-3411167
     (State of Incorporation)                (I.R.S. Employer ID No.)

  5575 DTC Parkway, Suite 355
       Englewood, Colorado                            80111 
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)            (Zip Code)

                            (303) 770-8283
              (Registrant's Telephone No. incl. area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to
such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

               YES  X                             NO __

The number of shares outstanding of each of the Registrant's class of common
equity, as of August 31, 1996 are as follows:

       Class of Securities                  Shares Outstanding
  ------------------------------            ------------------
  Common Stock, $.0001 par value                16,836,771

==============================================================================


PART II.     Other Information


Item 6.    		Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K		



Exhibits.    The following exhibits  are included as part of this report. 



Exhibit
Page
Number                    Document                            Page Number
-------                   --------                            -----------
EX-27                     FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE




                              SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the registration requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf
by the undersigned, thereto duly authorized.






DATE:   MARCH 04, 1997        BY:    /s/ R. Gene Klawetter


                                         R. Gene Klawetter
                                         President / CEO / Director




DATE:   MARCH 04, 1997        BY:    /s/ Daniel M. Smith 


                                         Daniel M. Smith
                                         Acting Chief Financial Officer,
                                         Controller, Chief Accounting Officer
Payment of the principal of (and premium, if any) and interest on this Security will be madeat the office or agency of the Company maintained for that purpose in New York City, in such coinor currency of the United States of America as at the time of payment is legal tender for paymentof public and private debts; provided, however, that at the option of the Company payment ofinterest may be made by check mailed to the address of the Person entitled thereto as such addressshall appear in the Security Register.     Reference is hereby made to the further provisions of this Security set forth on the reversehereof, which further provisions shall for all purposes have the same effect as if set forth atthis place.     Unless the certificate of authentication hereon has been executed by the Trustee referred toon the reverse hereof by manual signature, this Security shall not be entitled to any benefit underthe Indenture or be valid or obligatory for any purpose.     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this instrument to be duly executed under afacsimile of its corporate seal.Dated: September 10, 2007         ROHM AND HAAS COMPANY         [Corporate Seal] By:           Attest:              This is one of the Securities of a series designated under the Indenture described herein.THE BANK OF NEW YORK,
Bar Docket No. 9169

#### In the Matter of John F. Thompson, *Respondent.*

DATED this 22nd day of April, 2016.

(371 P.3d 348)

In a letter signed April 16, 2016, addressed to die Clerk of the Appellate Courts, respondent John F. Thompson, of Leavenworth, an attorney admitted to practice law in the State of Kansas, voluntarily surrendered his license to practice law in Kansas, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 217 (2015 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 390).

At the time the respondent surrendered his license, two complaints had been docketed by the office of the Disciplinary Administrator for investigation. One complaint alleged that the respondent violated Kansas Rules of Professional Conduct (KRPC) 1.1 (2015 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 442) (competence), and the other complaint alleged that the respondent violated KRPC 1.15 (2015 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 556) (safekeeping property) and KRPC 8.4 (2015 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 672) (misconduct).

This court, having examined the files of the office of the Disciplinary Administrator, finds that surrender of the respondents license should be accepted and that the respondent should be disbarred.

It Is Therefore Ordered that John F. Thompson be and is hereby disbarred from tire practice of law in Kansas and his license and privilege to practice law are hereby revoked.

It Is Further Ordered that the Clerk of the Appellate Courts strike the name of John F. Thompson from the roll of attorneys licensed to practice law in Kansas.

It Is Further Ordered that this order shall be published in the Kansas Reports, that the costs herein shall be assessed to the respondent, and that the respondent forthwith shall comply with Supreme Court Rule 218 (2015 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 401).
#### State v. Adams

106,059

08/29/13

Denied.

Unpublished
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 353 

Supporting the goals and ideals of ‘‘American Education Week’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 10, 2009 

Mrs. HAGAN (for herself, Mr. JOHANNS, Mr. BROWN, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. 

BEGICH, Mr. TESTER, Mr. FEINGOLD, Mr. BURRIS, Ms. MIKULSKI, and 

Mr. DODD) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of ‘‘American Education 

Week’’. 

Whereas the National Education Association has designated 

November 15 through November 21, 2009, as the 88th 

annual observance of ‘‘American Education Week’’; 

Whereas public schools are the backbone of democracy in the 

United States, providing young people with the tools 

needed to maintain the precious values of freedom, civility, and equality in our Nation; 

Whereas by equipping young people in the United States with 

both practical skills and broader intellectual abilities, 

public schools give young people hope for, and access to, 

a productive future; 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 353 IS 

Whereas people working in the field of public education, including teachers, higher education faculty and staff, 

custodians, substitute educators, bus drivers, clerical 

workers, food service professionals, workers in skilled 

trades, health and student service workers, security 

guards, technical employees, and librarians, work tirelessly to serve children and communities throughout the 

Nation with care and professionalism; and 

Whereas public schools are community linchpins, bringing together adults, children, educators, volunteers, business 

leaders, and elected officials in a common enterprise: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) supports the goals and ideals of ‘‘American 

3 Education Week’’; and 

4 (2) encourages the people of the United States 

5 to observe ‘‘American Education Week’’ by reflecting 

6 on the positive impact of all those who work together 

7 to educate children. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
No. 12-5580.

#### Postell *v.*Napel, Warden.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 12-6172.

#### Pillow *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 73 (Wednesday, April 16, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 18598]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-9757]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-255-001]


TransColorado Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Proposed 
Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

April 10, 1997.
    Take notice that on April 4, 1997, TransColorado Gas Transmission 
Company (TransColorado) tendered for filing and acceptance the 
following tariff sheets to its FERC Gas Tariff, Original Volume No. 1, 
to become effective March 20, 1997:

Substitute Second Revised Sheet No. 103
Substitute First Revised Sheet No. 113
Substitute First Revised Sheet No. 262
Substitute Original Sheet No. 263

    TransColorado states that it has revised certain aspects of its 
negotiated rate tariff provisions in compliance with the Commission's 
order issued March 20, 1997 at Docket No. RP97-255-000.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-9757 Filed 4-15-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Boydston v. Schnurr

108,829

10/28/13

Denied

Unpublished
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

BYRON J. THOMAS,

Petitioner

v.

PENNSYLVANIA PAROLE BOARD,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 4 WM 2023

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 4 th day of April , 2023, the Application for Extraordinary Relief is

DENIED.
S95Y1625.

#### IN THE MATTER OF JAMES CURTISS BERNARD.

(462 SE2d 376)

Decided October 16, 1995.

*William P. Smith III, General Counsel State Bar, E. Duane Cooper, Assistant General Counsel State Bar,*for State Bar of Georgia.

Per curiam.

We accepted Respondent’s petition for voluntary suspension of his license to practice law pending the appeal of his conviction in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia for attempted extortion of money from a criminal defendant. *In the Matter of James Curtis Bernard,*262 Ga. 656 (424 SE2d 785) (1993). Following the affirmance of his conviction by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, Respondent has filed a petition for voluntary surrender of his license to practice law in Georgia, in which petition he admits a violation of Standard 66 of Rule 4-102 (d) of the Rules and Regulations of the State Bar of Georgia.

After review of the record, we adopt the recommendation of the special master and the review panel that Respondent’s surrender of his license be granted, and hereby order that Respondent’s name be stricken from the rolls of those entitled to practice law in Georgia. Since voluntary surrender of a license is tantamount to disbarment, Respondent may seek reinstatement to the State Bar of Georgia only upon compliance with the State Bar reinstatement procedures in effect at the time his petition for reinstatement is filed. Respondent is reminded that he must comply with all requirements of Bar Rule 4-219 (c), including certification to this Court that he has satisfied all the requirements of that rule.

*Voluntary surrender of license accepted.*

*All the Justices concur.*
#### Sims v. State

107,664

08/19/13

Denied.

Unpublished
Exhibit 32.1






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the annual report of Neonode Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “report”), the undersigned, Per Bystedt, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and David W. Brunton, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:
 
 1.
The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except for the audit of our financial statements by our independent registered public accounting firm ; and2.
The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
 
 Dated: March 29, 2010
 
 /s/ Per Bystedt

/s/ David W. BruntonPer Bystedt

David W. BruntonChief Executive Officer

Chief Financial Officer
 
 This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference to any filing of Neonode Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.