alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ACCEPTED

04-16-00376-CV

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

9/15/2016 9:08:59 AM

KEITH HOTTLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 9/15/2016 9:08:59 AM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM U.S.
TRUCKING, INC. REVIEWED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH
31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         441,062
<SECURITIES>                                   171,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               16,440,606
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (310,451)
<INVENTORY>                                    258,405
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            23,323,279
<PP&E>                                       1,641,224
<DEPRECIATION>                                (621,890)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              41,535,292
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       22,498,254
<BONDS>                                      2,335,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  5,265,762
<COMMON>                                     7,648,324
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,404,437
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                41,535,292
<SALES>                                     18,062,940
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,062,940
<CGS>                                       18,048,057
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               18,048,057
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (386,705)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             341,856
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 59,732
<INCOME-TAX>                                    22,300
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             37,432
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    37,432
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 31(b) CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Paul Caceres, Jr., certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of CAM Commerce Solutions, Inc; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986] c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented
in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of the registrants board of directors: a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. Dated: February 11, 2005 By: /s/Paul Caceres, Jr.Paul Caceres, Jr.Chief Financial Officer andChief Accounting Officer
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 49 (Thursday, March 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 11939]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6253]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Economic Injury Disaster Loan Area #9389]


Declaration of Disaster Loan Area Minnesota

    Kandiyohi, Lincoln, Murray, and Stevens Counties and the contiguous 
Counties of Big Stone, Chippewa, Cottonwood, Douglas, Grant, Jackson, 
Lyon, Meeker, Nobles, Pipestone, Pope, Redwood, Renville, Rock, 
Stearns, Swift, Traverse and Yellow Medicine in the State of Minnesota 
constitute an economic injury disaster loan area as a result of severe 
winter storms and blizzard conditions during the period beginning 
November 1996 through January 1997. Eligible small businesses without 
credit available elsewhere and small agricultural cooperatives without 
credit available elsewhere may file applications for economic injury 
assistance for this disaster until the close of business on December 4, 
1997 at the address listed below: U.S. Small Business Administration, 
Disaster Area 2 Office, One Baltimore Place, Suite 300, Atlanta, GA 
30308, or other locally announced locations. The interest rate for 
eligible small businesses and small agricultural cooperatives is 4 
percent. Any contiguous counties not listed herein have been covered 
under a separate declaration for the same occurrence.
    The economic injury number assigned to this disaster is 938900.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 59002)

    Dated: March 4, 1997.
Ginger Lew,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 97-6253 Filed 3-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> BD
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       8,106,422
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,841,802
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                  0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                                0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                                  0
<PP&E>                                       6,677,324
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              26,561,572
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<PAYABLES>                                  12,324,576
<REPOS-SOLD>                                         0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                                  0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                                   0
<LONG-TERM>                                  5,699,588
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,500,402
<COMMON>                                       271,167
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,765,839
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                26,561,572
<TRADING-REVENUE>                                    0
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                           136,846
<COMMISSIONS>                               25,680,480
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                        0
<FEE-REVENUE>                                4,719,528
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              94,642
<COMPENSATION>                               4,040,623
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                314,657
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     135,303
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   135,303
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03
        

</TABLE>
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T VO NN Y JUL I AN A, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 07- 71491 A ge nc yN o. A 097- 620- 793 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d Jul y19, 2010 ** B efo re: B . F L E T C H E R , R E IN H A R D T , an dW A R D L A W , C i rcu i tJu d g es. V onnyJul i a na , ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of I ndone s i a , pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of

the B oa r d of I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s ’ or de rdi s m i s s i ng he rappe a l f r om a n i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s de c i s i on de ny i ng he rappl i c a t i on f ora s y l um , w i thhol di ng of r e m ova l , a nd pr ot e c t i on unde rthe C onve nt i on A ga i ns tT ortur e ( “ C A T ” ) . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on 

# FI LED JU L 29 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS07- 71491 2 u n d e r8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e r e v ie w f o rs u b s ta n tia l e v id e n c e . W akkaryv. H

older , 558 F . 3d 1049, 1056 ( 9th C i r . 2009) . W e de nythe pe t i t i on f orr e vi e w i n pa rt , gr a nt i n pa rt , a nd r e m a nd. S u b st an t i al ev i d en ce su p p o rt s th e ag en cy’ s d en i al o f C A T rel i ef b ecau se Ju lian af a ile dto s h o w it is m o r e lik e lyth a n n o t th a t s h e w o u ldb e to rtu r e dif r e m o v e dto I n d o n e s ia . See W a kka ry , 558 F . 3d a t1067- 68. In as se ss i ng Jul i ana’ s a sy l um and w i thh ol di ng of re m ov alcl ai m s, the agency o n l y co n si d eredth e i n ci d en t s o f h arm sh e su ffered o n acco u n to f h er C h i n ese ethn i ci ty, and d i d n otconsi der the harm s s he suff er ed on ac coun tof her C hr i s t i a ni ty . B e c aus e the a ge nc yha s notc ons i de r e d the c um ul a t i ve i m pa c tof the s e ha rm s i n a s s e s s i ng r e l i e f , w e r e m a nd Jul i a na ’ s a s y l um a nd w i thhol di ng of r e m o v a l c la im s f

o rth e a g e n c yto c o n s id e rin th e f ir s t in s ta n c e . See IN

S v. V en tu ra , 5 3 7 U .S . 1 2 , 1 6 - 1 8 ( 2 0 0 2 ) ( p e rc u r ia m ) ; se e al so T am pu bo lon v. H

older , 598 F . 3d 5 2 1 , 5 2 6 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 1 0 ) ( “[ A ]n yr e a s o n ab le f a c tf in d e rw o u ldb e c o m p e lle dto c o n c lu d e o n th is r e c o r dth a t C h r is tian I n d o n e s ia n s a r e ad is f a v o r e dg r o up .” ) . E a c h p a rtys h a ll b e a rth e iro w n c o s ts o n ap p e a l. P E T IT IO N F O R R E V IE W D E N IE D i n p art; G R A N T E D i n p art; R EM A N D ED .
No. 102,411

#### In the Matter of William J. Hunsaker, *Respondent.*

(308 P.3d 1269)

Dated this 24th day of September, 2013.

On October 9, 2009, this court suspended the respondent, William J. Hunsaker, from the practice of law in Kansas for a period of 90 days. See *In re Hunsaker,*289 Kan. 828, 217 P.3d 962 (2009). Before reinstatement, the respondent was required to pay the costs of the disciplinary action.

On July 18, 2013, the respondent filed a petition with this court for reinstatement to the practice of law in Kansas. The Disciplinary Administrator affirmed that the respondent paid the costs of the disciplinary action.

The court, after carefully considering die record, grants the respondent’s petition for reinstatement.

It Is Therefore Ordered that the respondent be reinstated to the practice of law in Kansas conditioned upon his compliance with the annual continuing legal education requirements and upon his payment of all fees required by the Clerk of the Appellate Courts and the Kansas Continuing Legal Education Commission. When the respondent has complied with the annual continuing legal education requirements and has paid the fees required by the Clerk of the Appellate Courts and the Kansas Continuing Legal Education Commission, the Clerk is directed to enter respondent’s name upon the roster of attorneys engaged in the practice of law in Kansas.

It Is Further Ordered that this order of reinstatement of William J. Hunsaker shall be published in the official Kansas Reports, and the costs of the reinstatement proceedings are assessed to the respondent.
EX-10.11





 Exhibit 10.11 

WORK ORDER #1 

This Work Order dated June 24, 2021 by and between Castle Creek Biosciences, LLC (“Castle Creek”) and John Maslowski
(“Consultant”) and is incorporated into the Master Consulting Agreement dated June 24, 2021 (“Agreement”) by and between Castle Creek and Consultant. This Work Order describes Services to be performed and provided by
Consultant pursuant to the Agreement. In the event of any conflict between the Agreement and any provision of this Work Order, the Agreement will control unless the Parties’ intent to alter the terms of the Agreement is expressly set forth in
such provision, and such alteration shall only apply to this Work Order and shall not be construed as an amendment to the terms of the Agreement. All capitalized terms used and not expressly defined in this Work Order will have the meanings given to
them in the Agreement. 
 1. Scope of Work: 
  

	 	•	 	 Participate in Testing the Waters and IPO roadshow investor meetings. 



 

	 	•	 	 Assist with transitioning relationships with third parties, including [***]. 



 

	 	•	 	 Assist with the transition of Consultant’s responsibilities and knowledge to a newly-hired Chief Scientific
Officer and others at Castle Creek. 


 2. Anticipated Timeframe to Completion: September 30, 2021 

3. Deliverable(s): The tangible items arising out of the Scope of Work. 

4. Fees: $6,000/month from June 2021 to September 2021. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the duly authorized representatives of the Parties hereto have caused this Work Order to be duly executed as of the last date set forth
below. 
  

									
	Castle Creek Biosciences, LLC	  		  	John Maslowski
					
	By:	  	 /s/ Matt Gantz
	  	    	  	By:	  	 /s/ John Maslowski

	Name:	  	  
	  		  	Name:	  	  

	Title:	  	  
	  		  	Title:	  	  

	Date:	  	  
	  		  	Date:	  	  



 

							
	CONFIDENTIAL
                                         
               Page 1 of 1
*

 This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited,

however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th

Cir. R. 32.1.

After examining Plaintiff’s brief and the appellate record, this panel has

determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the

determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). 

The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument..

FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

October 8, 2008

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

MARTIN VASQUEZ, 

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

CITY OF KINSLEY, KANSAS,

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 08-3175

(D.C. No. 5:08-CV-03130-SAC)

(D. Kan.)

 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before O’BRIEN, McKAY, and GORSUCH, Circuit Judges.

Pro se Plaintiff Martin Vasquez appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 

42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be

granted. We review the court’s dismissal of his complaint de novo. See Riddle v.

Mondragon, 83 F.3d 1197, 1201 (10th Cir. 1996). 

The Supreme Court has held that “a local government may not be sued
-2-

under § 1983 for an injury inflicted solely by its employees or agents,” Monell v.

Dep’t of Soc. Servs., 436 U.S. 658, 694 (1978), but will be held liable only where

“action pursuant to official municipal policy of some nature caused a

constitutional tort,” id. at 691. Even liberally construed, Plaintiff’s complaint

does not claim that the alleged malicious prosecution was caused by any such

official policy, nor does the complaint reasonably suggest that such a claim could

be supported. Therefore, for substantially the reasons delineated by the district

court, we AFFIRM the district court’s dismissal of Plaintiff’s claim. 

We advise Plaintiff that the district court’s dismissal of his complaint for

failure to state a claim counts as a strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), and

we remind him that, upon incurring three strikes, he will no longer be able to

proceed in forma pauperis in a civil action in federal court unless he is “under

imminent danger of serious injury,” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). We also remind

Plaintiff of his obligation to continue making partial payments until his filing fee

has been paid in full.

Entered for the Court

Monroe G. McKay

Circuit Judge
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan Daniel MARES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-10564 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed January 3, 2018

*823James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Kevin Joel Page, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, Bonita L. Gunden, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Amarillo, TX, for Defendant-Appellant

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Juan Mares pleaded guilty of possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine. He contends that the district court plainly erred under the Fifth and Sixth Amendments by imposing a sentence based on factual findings that were not supported by proof beyond a reasonable doubt. He concedes that his theory is foreclosed under current circuit law, but he raises the claim solely to preserve it for further review.

The government has filed an unopposed motion for summary affirmance or, alternatively, for an extension of time to file a brief on the merits. Summary affirmance is proper where, among other instances, “the position of one of the parties is clearly right as a matter of law so that there can be no substantial question as to the outcome of the case.” *Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis,*406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969). Because Mares’s arguments are foreclosed by *United States v. Tuma,*738 F.3d 681, 693 (5th Cir. 2013), the motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment is AFFIRMED. The government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file its brief is DENIED as unnecessary.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
# m94_39
# X11- Total Expenditures
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 57 (Tuesday, March 25, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 14143]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-7489]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY
[FEMA-1167-DR]


Tennessee; Amendment to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of Tennessee, (FEMA-1167-DR), dated March 7, 1997, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 14, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3260.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster for the State 
of Tennessee, is hereby amended to include the following areas among 
those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the 
catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of March 7, 1997:

    The counties of Dickson, Gibson, Houston, Lauderdale, and 
Weakley for Individual Assistance, Hazard Mitigation, and Categories 
A and B under the Public Assistance program.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 83.516, Disaster 
Assistance.)
Lacy E. Suiter,
Executive Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 97-7489 Filed 3-24-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
No. 12-5537.

#### Sisney *v.*Reisch, Secretary, South Dakota Department of Corrections, et al.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certio-rari denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.