alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 146 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 146

 Commending South Charleston, West Virginia, for celebrating its 50th 
                annual Armed Forces Day on May 16, 2009.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 12, 2009

  Mr. Byrd (for himself and Mr. Rockefeller) submitted the following 
   resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

                              May 14, 2009

             Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Commending South Charleston, West Virginia, for celebrating its 50th 
                annual Armed Forces Day on May 16, 2009.

Whereas Americans appreciate the courage, loyalty, and sacrifice of every 
        individual who serves in the Armed Forces of the United States;
Whereas Armed Forces Day is celebrated on the third Saturday in May to honor 
        those Americans serving in the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force, and 
        Coast Guard;
Whereas Armed Forces Day was established on August 31, 1949, following the 
        consolidation of the military services of the United States into the 
        Department of Defense;
Whereas Armed Forces Day is celebrated with parades, open houses, receptions, 
        and air shows around the Nation; and
Whereas on May 16, 2009, South Charleston, West Virginia, will observe its 50th 
        annual Armed Forces Day with a parade, music, and other entertainment: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate commends South Charleston, West Virginia, 
for conducting Armed Forces Day celebrations for 50 consecutive years 
and for honoring the selfless dedication and bravery of the men and 
women of the United States Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force, and 
Coast Guard.
                                 <all>
```
No. 11-1426.

#### National Organization for Marriage, Inc., et al. *v.*McKee et al.

C. A. 1st Cir. Motion of respondents for leave to file brief in opposition under seal with redacted copies for the public record granted. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                               CAMBREX CORPORATION
     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cambrex Corporation (the "Company")
on form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gregory P. Sargen,
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
          15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Dated: May 9, 2007


                                        /s/ Gregory P. Sargen
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Gregory P. Sargen
                                        Vice President and Chief Financial
                                        Officer


                                       33
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 56 (Monday, March 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 13897]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-7288]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[ES-960-1910-00-4377, ES-48651, Group 159, Wisconsin]

Notice of Filing of Plat of Survey; Wisconsin

    The plat of the dependent resurvey of a portion of the 
subdivisional lines, and the subdivision of section 14, Township 40 
North, Range 4 East, Fourth Principal Meridian, Wisconsin, will be 
officially filed in Eastern States, Springfield, Virginia at 7:30 a.m., 
on April 28, 1997.
    The survey was requested by the Bureau of Indian Affairs.
    All inquiries or protests concerning the technical aspects of the 
survey must be sent to the Chief Cadastral Surveyor, Eastern States, 
Bureau of Land Management, 7450 Boston Boulevard, Springfield, Virginia 
22153, prior to 7:30 a.m., April 28, 1997.
    Copies of the plat will be made available upon request and 
prepayment of the reproduction fee of $2.75 per copy.

    Dated: March 14, 1997.
Stephen G. Kopach,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor.
[FR Doc. 97-7288 Filed 3-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GJ-P
```
No. 11-11097.

#### Ismay *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
STANDARD REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: No PMN: 08-0733 734 Focus Ready Draft 10/6/2008 **Revised 11/5/2008 Changes in bold type** Revised 12/01/2008 Changes in bold italic **Revised 06/17/2010 Changes in bold underline** ENGINEER: Arnold \ CPW PV (kg/yr):

SUBMITTER:

USE:

OTHER USES:

MSDS: Label: No

Gen Eqpt: Respirator:
Health Effects: TLV/PEL:

CRSS : Chemical Name: Multi-walled carbon nanotubes S-H20: 0.000001 g/L @
VP: 1.0E-6 torr @
MW: %<500 %<1000 Physical State and Misc CRSS Info:Consumer Use:

SAT (concerns) (09/30/2008): Related Cases and Related Cases and Misc SAT Info:

. Migration to groundwater: Unknown PBT rating: PBT P3BUT2 Health: 1-2 Dermal, Drinking Water, Inhalation
Eco: 1 No releases to Water

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 2B

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS: P2 Claims:

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: NoINITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: No PMN: 08-0733 734

Number of Sites/ Location: unknown site(s) Days/yr: Basis:

Process Description:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may coincide with daily releases from the other sources to the same medium.INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: No PMN: 08-0733 734

Number of Sites/ Location: unknown site(s) Days/yr:

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: Basis:

Inhalation:

Dermal:INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: No PMN: 08-0733 734

Number of Sites/ Location: unknown site(s) Days/yr: Basis:

Process Description:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may coincide with daily releases from the other sources to the same medium.OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: Basis:

Inhalation:

Dermal:INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: No PMN: 08-0733 734

Number of Sites/ Location: unknown site(s) Days/yr: Basis:

Process Description:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may coincide with daily releases from the other sources to the same medium.OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: Basis:

Inhalation:

Dermal:
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 21, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134478 & (134) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 134478 

 COA: 257846 

Eaton CC: 03-020327-FH 

RICHARD LEE HASSELBRING,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 5, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to 

expand the record is DENIED. 

CAVANAGH and KELLY, JJ., would grant leave to appeal. 

p1114 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 21, 2007 

 Clerk
# Table 3b_Real
No. 11-10698.

#### Waliyud-Din *v.*Kelly, Attorney General of Pennsylvania.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
U.S. Energy Information Administration Independent Statistics & Analysis www.eia.gov

For

EIA Energy Conference

June 2018 | Washington, DC

By

Vipin Arora, EIA

India’s energy economy

Breakout Session
My objectives are pretty simple...

• Interesting discussion

• Inform and learn about different aspects of India’s energy markets and 

economy

– EIA wants to improve our understanding of India

• Identify key areas for further study

• International Energy Outlook 2018

2 EIA Energy Conference 2018 
• IEO2018 will be the first to feature 

the energy implications of 

macroeconomic sensitivities

• Assume economic growth is higher 

than the Reference case over the 

2015 to 2040 period

• Focus on three regions:

– India

– China

– Africa

IEO2018 will feature macroeconomic sensitivities in three regions

3 EIA Energy Conference 2018 
Increase in Indian energy consumption compared to 

IEO2018 Reference case, 2040

EIA Energy Conference 2018 

IEO2018 has three Indian economic growth cases with different energy 

implications

Source: Preliminary results from IEO2018, World Energy Projections System Plus (2018)

4

• All three cases assume economic 

growth higher than the baseline

– The composition of growth differs

• Composition matters for energy 

consumption, but not as much as 

the growth itself

• Increases in energy consumption 

are concentrated in the industrial 

end-use sector
We have three great panelists with a wealth of knowledge about India 

and Indian energy markets

• Jitendra Roychoudhury, King Abdullah Petroleum Studies and Research 

Center (KAPSARC)

– What does the future of India’s energy sector look like?

• Lauren Diekman, U.S.-India Business Council

– How will US/India energy relations look in 20 years?

• Meredydd Evans, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL)

– What energy data exist or are needed to monitor key policies, reforms, and better understand 

future Indian energy markets?

5 EIA Energy Conference 2018 
Discussion questions

• What are the key uncertainties in the Indian energy outlook over the next 5-

10 years?

• Where can EIA add the most value in terms of analysis or data with respect 

to India?

• (Time permitting) Will Indian fossil fuel exports continue unhindered or will 

there be societal pressure for a reduction as seems to be building against 

petroleum coke exports to India?

6 EIA Energy Conference 2018
U.S. Energy Information Administration | Quarterly Coal Report, January - March 2024

Table 34. Coal consumption at other industrial plants by census division and state

(thousand short tons)

Year to date

Census division

and state

January - March

2024

October - December

2023

January - March

2023 2024 2023

Percent

change

Middle Atlantic 153 112 214 153 214 -28.4

New York 68 31 105 68 105 -35.5

Pennsylvania 86 82 110 86 110 -21.7

East North Central 894 884 1,034 894 1,034 -13.6

Illinois 424 381 455 424 455 -6.8

Indiana 264 278 319 264 319 -17.1

Michigan 68 69 75 68 75 -9.4

Ohio 92 78 95 92 95 -3.3

Wisconsin 45 78 90 45 90 -49.6

West North Central 2,384 2,260 2,827 2,384 2,827 -15.7

Iowa 500 530 532 500 532 -6.0

Kansas 13 31 28 13 28 -53.3

Minnesota 268 261 332 268 332 -19.4

Missouri 175 193 180 175 180 -3.0

Nebraska 125 148 247 125 247 -49.4

North Dakota 1,265 1,027 1,440 1,265 1,440 -12.2

South Dakota 39 70 68 39 68 -42.1

South Atlantic 326 314 409 326 409 -20.4

Florida 15 23 27 15 27 -44.2

Georgia 52 42 53 52 53 -3.3

Maryland 73 95 66 73 66 9.3

North Carolina 30 25 83 30 83 -64.1

South Carolina 13 16 25 13 25 -49.3

Virginia 72 57 101 72 101 -28.4

West Virginia 72 56 54 72 54 34.3

East South Central 594 597 613 594 613 -3.1

Alabama 90 112 119 90 119 -24.9

Kentucky 153 165 179 153 179 -14.9

Mississippi 26 22 20 26 20 29.2

Tennessee 326 298 294 326 294 10.7

West South Central 186 177 201 186 201 -7.4

Arkansas 31 28 37 31 37 -16.7

Louisiana 69 70 76 69 76 -8.6

Oklahoma 35 34 38 35 38 -6.9

Texas 51 46 51 51 51 0.7

Mountain 520 620 605 520 605 -14.1

Arizona 41 58 61 41 61 -32.9

Colorado 22 28 30 22 30 -26.0

Idaho 14 15 21 14 21 -36.3

Montana 37 82 52 37 52 -29.8

Nevada 43 50 46 43 46 -7.5

New Mexico 11 16 13 11 13 -16.9

Utah 66 76 64 66 64 2.9

Wyoming 288 294 318 288 318 -9.5

Pacific 368 367 360 368 360 2.3

Alaska s s s s s s

California 344 327 328 344 328 4.7

Oregon 4 18 10 4 10 -54.3

Washington 20 21 22 20 22 -8.4

U.S. Total 5,426 5,332 6,265 5,426 6,265 -13.4

- = No data reported.

s = Absolute percentage less than 0.05 or value is less than 0.5 of the table metric.

Note: Total may not equal sum of components because of independent rounding.

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), Form EIA-3, 'Quarterly Survey of Industrial, Commercial & Institutional Coal Users' and Form EIA-7A, 'Annual

Survey of Coal Production and Preparation.'
No. 12-5578.

#### Toelupe *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 31.1
 
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 DATE: May 6, 2009
    By:
    /s/ Henry L. NordhoffHenry L. NordhoffChairman and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   infomration  extracted  from
     LONGHORN, INC. June 30, 1996 financial statements and is qualified
     in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                         0000819818
<NAME>                        LONGHORN, INC.

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996

<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1996

<CASH>                                                   0
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                          (1,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             0
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          0
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                             0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. §1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1)   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  DATE:                November 14, 2007 |  /s/                James E. Rouse                           |
|----------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                         | James                E.                Rouse                      |
|                                         | PresidentandChief                Executive                Officer |

*A      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been      provided to Arrhythmia Research Technology, Inc. and will be retained by      Arrhythmia Research Technology, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*

----
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Dawn H. Bertsche, Senior Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Multi-Color Corporation (the Company), certify pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 7, 2008



By:

/s/ Dawn H. BertscheDawn H. BertscheSenior Vice President Finance,Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            FEB-28-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                 AUG-31-1998
<CASH>                                           25,548  
<SECURITIES>                                    629,937  
<RECEIVABLES>                                     8,548  
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0  
<INVENTORY>                                           0  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                664,333  
<PP&E>                                          155,521  
<DEPRECIATION>                                  147,280  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                1,231,864  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         1,198,060  
<BONDS>                                         157,461  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0  
<PREFERRED>                                   1,000,000  
<COMMON>                                          2,518  
<OTHER-SE>                                   (1,126,175) 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  1,231,864  
<SALES>                                               0  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  3,118  
<CGS>                                                 0  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   370,758  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                123,816  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    0  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (491,456) 
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0  
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   0  
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0  
<CHANGES>                                             0  
<NET-INCOME>                                   (491,456) 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (.06) 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (.06) 
                                               


</TABLE>