alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7805

WILLIE MORRIS MCBRIDE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WILLIAM F. RUTHERFORD, Judge; MORRIS B. GUTTERMAN, Judge; LYDIA CALVERT TAYLOR, Judge; CHARLES D. GRIFFITH, JR.; NORMAN A. THOMAS; THOMAS C. DANIEL, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-97-430) Submitted: October 20, 1998 Decided: November 3, 1998 Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Willie Morris McBride, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Willie Morris McBride appeals from the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. The district court’s dismissal without prejudice is not appealable. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers’ Local Union 392 , 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). A dismissal without prejudice is a final order only if “‘no amendment [in the complaint] could cure the defects in the plaintiff’s case.’” Id. at 1067 (quoting Coniston Corp. v. Village of Hoffman Estates , 844 F.2d 461, 463 (7th Cir. 1988)). In ascertaining whether a dismissal without prejudice is reviewable in this court, the court must determine “whether the plaintiff could save his action by merely amending his complaint.” Domino Sugar, 10 F.3d at 1066-67. In this case, McBride may move in the district court to reopen his case and to file an amended complaint specifically alleging facts sufficient to state a claim under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983. Therefore, the dismissal order is not appealable. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary finanical information extracted from the
Company's Consolidated Statements of Earnings, Consolidated Balance Sheets and
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the period ended December 31, 1995 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    1,574,434
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     33,433
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         289,911
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       137,891
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,035,669
<COMMON>                                       208,870
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      468,735
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             25,243
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 702,848
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     12,800
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           728,843
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                      146
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 591,032
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                2,035,669
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      808,465
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            50,793
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     664,883
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     695,077
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        113,388
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                              20,108
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 133,496
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        57,934
<NET-INCOME>                                    75,562
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      3,714
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   71,848
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                             0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       38,422
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         147,075
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### City of Lincoln Center v. Farmway Co-Op, Inc.

105,962

04/19/13

Granted.

47 Kan. App. 2d 335
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 December 9, 2015

a1202

Order 

Clerk

December 9, 2015

151930

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 151930

COA: 326225 

Lapeer CC: 14-012016-FH

BYRON JAY KONSCHUH,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 8, 2015 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
No. 12-68.

#### Law Offices of Theodore Coates, P. C. *v.*AIG Annuity Insurance Co. et al.

C. A. 10th Cir. Motion of petitioner to defer consideration of petition for writ of certiorari denied. Certiorari denied.
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 151 

Designates a national day of remembrance on October 30, 2009, for nuclear 

weapons program workers. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 14, 2009 

Mr. BUNNING (for himself, Mr. ALEXANDER, Ms. MURKOWSKI, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mr. UDALL of Colorado, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. VOINOVICH, Mr. REID, 

Mr. CORKER, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mrs. MURRAY, and Mr. MCCONNELL) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Designates a national day of remembrance on October 30, 

2009, for nuclear weapons program workers. 

Whereas hundreds of thousands of men and women have 

served this Nation in building its nuclear defense since 

World War II; 

Whereas these dedicated American workers paid a high price 

for their service and have developed disabling or fatal illnesses as a result of exposure to beryllium, ionizing radiation, toxic substances, and other hazards that are 

unique to the production and testing of nuclear weapons; 

Whereas these workers were put at individual risk without 

their knowledge and consent in order to develop a nuclear 


SMARTINEZ on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 151 IS 

weapons program for the benefit of all American citizens; 

and 

Whereas these patriotic men and women deserve to be recognized for their contribution, service, and sacrifice towards 

the defense of our great Nation: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates October 30, 2009, as a national 

3 day of remembrance for American nuclear weapons 

4 program workers and uranium miners, millers, and 

5 haulers; and 

6 (2) encourages the people of the United States 

7 to support and participate in appropriate cere8 monies, programs, and other activities to commemo9 rate October 30, 2009, as a national day of remem10 brance for past and present workers in America’s 

11 nuclear weapons program. 

Æ 


SMARTINEZ on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 62 (Tuesday, April 1, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15459-15460]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-8263]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
[Docket 17-97]


Foreign-Trade Zone 143; West Sacramento, CA Area; Application for 
Expansion

    An application has been submitted to the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) 
Board (the Board) by the Sacramento-Yolo Port District, grantee of FTZ 
143, requesting authority to expand its zone in the West Sacramento and 
Lincoln, California area, adjacent to the San Francisco/Oakland/
Sacramento Customs port of entry. The application was submitted 
pursuant to the provisions of the Foreign-Trade Zones Act, as amended 
(19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), and the regulations of the Board (15 CFR Part 
400). It was formally filed on March 19, 1997.
    FTZ 143 was approved on August 6, 1987 (Board Order 360, 52 F.R. 
30698, 8/17/87). The zone project currently consist of the following 
sites: Site 1 (8 acres)--within the Port of Sacramento terminal area at 
2650 Industrial Blvd. and Boatman Ave., West Sacramento; and, Site 2 (6 
acres, 2 Bldgs.)--within the Lincoln Airport Business Park, Aviation 
Boulevard, Lincoln, some 25 miles northeast of Sacramento.
    This application is requesting authority to expand both existing 
sites as follows: Site 1--include the Southport area (505 acres) of the 
port complex located south of the Port's terminal facilities, West 
Sacramento, and include certain port property (173 acres) located at 
Industrial Boulevard and -2-Boatman Avenue, West Sacramento; and, Site 
2--include the entire Lincoln Airport Business Park (1,280 acres), in 
Lincoln. The proposed expansion areas would be used primarily for 
warehousing/distribution and freight forwarding activity. No specific 
manufacturing requests are being made at this time. Such requests would 
be made to the Board on a case-by-case basis.
    In accordance with the Board's regulations, a member of the FTZ 
Staff has been designated examiner to investigate the application and 
report to the Board.
    Public comment on the application is invited from interested 
parties. Submissions (original and 3 copies) shall be addressed to the 
Board's Executive Secretary at the address below. The closing period 
for their receipt is June 2, 1997. Rebuttal comments in response to 
material submitted during the foregoing period may be submitted during 
the subsequent 15-day period (to June 16, 1997). A copy of the 
application and accompanying exhibits will be available for public

[[Page 15460]]

inspection at each of the following locations:

Office of the Port Director, Sacramento-Yolo Port District, 1251 Beacon 
Boulevard, Suite 210, West Sacramento, CA 95691
Office of the Executive Secretary, Foreign-Trade Zones Board, Room 
3716, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th & Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20230

    Dated: March 24, 1997.
John J. Da Ponte, Jr.,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-8263 Filed 3-31-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 49 (Thursday, March 13, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 11769]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6359]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Parts 600 and 601

[Docket No. 95N-0411]
RIN 0910-AA71


Elimination of Establishment License Application for Specified 
Biotechnology and Specified Synthetic Biological Products; Correction

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is correcting a final 
rule that appeared in the Federal Register of May 14, 1996 (61 FR 
24227). The document amended the biologics regulations to eliminate the 
establishment license application (ELA) requirement for certain 
biotechnology and synthetic biological products subject to licensing 
under the Public Health Service Act (PHS Act); exempted these 
biotechnology and synthetic biological products from certain biologics 
regulations; and harmonized the requirements applicable to these 
products with those applicable to similar drug products which are 
approved under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act). The 
document referenced certain regulations that were later removed from 
Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). This document 
removes those references to ensure the consistency and accuracy of the 
CFR.

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 13, 1997.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sharon A. Carayiannis, Center for 
Biologics Evaluation and Research (HFM-630), Food and Drug 
Administration, 1401 Rockville Pike, suite 400S, Rockville, MD 20852-
1448, 301-594-3074.

    In FR Doc. 96-12144, appearing on page 24227, in the Federal 
Register of Tuesday, May 14, 1996, the following corrections are made:
    1. On page 24230, in the 2d column, in the 4th full paragraph, in 
the 8th line, remove ``; 601.30 to 601.33;'' and add ``, 601.33;'' in 
their place.


Sec. 601.2  [Corrected]

    2. On page 24233, in the 2d column, Sec. 601.2(c)(3) is corrected 
by removing ``, 601.30, 601.31, 601.32''.

    Dated: March 6, 1997.
William K. Hubbard,
Associate Commissioner for Policy Coordination.
[FR Doc. 97-6359 Filed 3-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
<PAGE>


                                                              Exhibit 24.10

                                  POWER OF ATTORNEY


         The undersigned, as a director of Rykoff-Sexton, Inc. (the 
"Company"), does hereby constitute and appoint Mark Van Stekelenburg, 
David F. McAnally and Robert J. Harter, Jr., and each of them, as his true and 
lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and 
resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all 
capacities, to sign the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal 
year ended June 28, 1997 and any and all amendments thereto, and to file the 
same, with exhibits and schedules thereto, and other documents therewith, 
with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said 
attorney-in-fact, full power and authority to do and perform each and every 
act and thing necessary or desirable to be done in and about the premises, as 
fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, thereby 
ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact, or his substitute, 
may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this      day of 
September, 1997.

                                        /s/ Robert W. Williamson           
                                   ------------------------------------
                                            Robert W. Williamson
### REGISTRATION NOT TRANSFERABLE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENTOFTRANSPORTATION- FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION CERTIFICAtE OF AIRCRAFT REGISTRATION

. NATIONALITY AND REGISTRATION MARKS 

## N 62 SJJ AIRCRAFT SERIAL NO. 

### PH645313544 V2.0 MANUFACTURER AND MANUFACTURER'S DESIGNATION OF AIRCRAFT 

### DJI PHANTOM 2 VISION 

## + ICAOAircraftAddres$ Code: 

### 52024641

I 

# s 

# s u E D T 0 

### JIMENEZ FERNANDO A RIVERA 

### 2 CALl,.E ESPERANZA CAMUY PUERTO RICO 00627-2640

Individual It Is certified that the above described aircraft has been entered 

## on the register ofthe Federal Aviation Administration,. United States.of America. in accordance 

### with the**C«:~nver\tion** on International Civil AViation dated December 7. 1944, and 

### with Tdle 49, United 

## States Code, and regulations issued thereunder. DATEOFisSUE 

### December 2, 2015**~~~_/** EXPIRATION DATE 

### December 31, 2018

## ~7- - This ceftlficate 

### Is Issued for 

### registration purposes only and is not a certificate**~title.** The 

### FederafA.tlon .Administration does 

### not determine right$ ofownership 

## aa betweenprivat$ persons.



### U.S. Department
#### State v. Balbirnie

106,849

02/12/14

Denied

Unpublished
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

 RASHIDI ABDU GIBSON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 2D20-3230

September 15, 2021.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Michelle 

Sisco, Judge.

Rashidi Abdu Gibson, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

LaROSE, ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, and LABRIT, JJ., Concur. 

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 370 

Relative to the death of Paula F. Hawkins, former United States Senator 

for the State of Florida. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 4, 2009 

Mr. MCCONNELL (for himself, Mr. REID, Mr. NELSON of Florida, Mr. 

LEMIEUX, Mr. AKAKA, Mr. ALEXANDER, Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. BAUCUS, 

Mr. BAYH, Mr. BEGICH, Mr. BENNET, Mr. BENNETT, Mr. BINGAMAN, 

Mr. BOND, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. BROWN, Mr. BROWNBACK, Mr. BUNNING, 

Mr. BURR, Mr. BURRIS, Mr. BYRD, Ms. CANTWELL, Mr. CARDIN, Mr. 

CARPER, Mr. CASEY, Mr. CHAMBLISS, Mr. COBURN, Mr. COCHRAN, Ms. 

COLLINS, Mr. CONRAD, Mr. CORKER, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. 

DEMINT, Mr. DODD, Mr. DORGAN, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. ENSIGN, Mr. ENZI, 

Mr. FEINGOLD, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. FRANKEN, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, Mr. 

GRAHAM, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. GREGG, Mrs. HAGAN, Mr. HARKIN, Mr. 

HATCH, Mrs. HUTCHISON, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. INOUYE, Mr. ISAKSON, Mr. 

JOHANNS, Mr. JOHNSON, Mr. KAUFMAN, Mr. KERRY, Mr. KIRK, Ms. 

KLOBUCHAR, Mr. KOHL, Mr. KYL, Ms. LANDRIEU, Mr. LAUTENBERG, 

Mr. LEAHY, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Mrs. LINCOLN, Mr. LUGAR, 

Mr. MCCAIN, Mrs. MCCASKILL, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mr. MERKLEY, Ms. MIKULSKI, Ms. MURKOWSKI, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. NELSON of Nebraska, Mr. 

PRYOR, Mr. REED, Mr. RISCH, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. ROCKEFELLER, Mr. 

SANDERS, Mr. SCHUMER, Mr. SESSIONS, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Mr. SHELBY, 

Ms. SNOWE, Mr. SPECTER, Ms. STABENOW, Mr. TESTER, Mr. THUNE, 

Mr. UDALL of Colorado, Mr. UDALL of New Mexico, Mr. VITTER, Mr. 

VOINOVICH, Mr. WARNER, Mr. WEBB, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, Mr. WICKER, 

and Mr. WYDEN) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Relative to the death of Paula F. Hawkins, former United 

States Senator for the State of Florida. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 370 ATS 

Whereas Paula F. Hawkins was a staunch consumer advocate 

and served the citizens of the State of Florida on its 

Public Service Commission for seven years, serving as its 

Chairman for three years; 

Whereas Paula F. Hawkins was instrumental in passing the 

Missing Children’s Assistance Act of 1984 and worked to 

help establish the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children; 

Whereas Paula F. Hawkins served the people of Florida with 

distinction for 6 years in the United States Senate: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate has heard with profound 

2 sorrow and deep regret the announcement of the death 

3 of the Honorable Paula F. Hawkins, former member of 

4 the United States Senate. 

5 Resolved, That the Secretary of the Senate commu6 nicate these resolutions to the House of Representatives 

7 and transmit an enrolled copy thereof to the family of the 

8 deceased. 

9 Resolved, That when the Senate adjourns today, it 

10 stand adjourned as a further mark of respect to the mem11 ory of the Honorable Paula F. Hawkins. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
#### IN RE JOHN D. ET AL.*

(AC 21087)

Lavery, C. X, and Flynn and Shea, Js.

Argued May 2

officially released May 22, 2001

*

**In accordance with the spirit and intent of General Statutes § 46b-142 (b) and Practice Book § 79-3, the names of the parties involved in this appeal axe not disclosed. The records and papers of this case shall be open for inspection only to persons having a proper interest therein and upon order of the Appellate Court.

*905Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed.
# mecs04a
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

         COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES / DEFICIENCY
       IN THE COVERAGE OF FIXED CHARGES BY EARNINGS BEFORE FIXED CHARGES
                             (DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                             -----------------------------------
                                                             2000   1999   1998    1997    1996
                                                             ----   ----   -----   ----   ------
<S>                                                          <C>    <C>    <C>     <C>    <C>
Earnings before fixed charges:
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income
  taxes....................................................  $748   $510   $(679)  $204   $  563
Interest and debt expense..................................   168    268     426    433      462
Interest portion of rental expense.........................    15     15      16     16       14
                                                             ----   ----   -----   ----   ------
Earnings (loss) before fixed charges.......................  $931   $793   $(237)  $653   $1,039
                                                             ====   ====   =====   ====   ======
Fixed charges:
Interest and debt expense..................................  $168   $268   $ 426   $433   $  462
Interest portion of rental expense.........................    15     15      16     16       14
                                                             ----   ----   -----   ----   ------
     Total fixed charges...................................  $183   $283   $ 442   $449   $  476
                                                             ====   ====   =====   ====   ======
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges.........................   5.1    2.8      --    1.5      2.2
                                                             ====   ====   =====   ====   ======
Deficiency in the coverage of fixed charges by earnings
  before fixed charges.....................................    --     --   $(679)    --       --
                                                             ====   ====   =====   ====   ======
</TABLE>
#### State v. Kebert

112,287

07/07/2016

Denied.

Unpublished
#### State v. Cervantes-Cano

107,179

11/20/13

Denied

Unpublished