alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 55 (Friday, March 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13604-13605]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-7167]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP97-28-003]


Wyoming Interstate Company, Ltd.; Notice of Tariff Compliance 
Filing

    Take notice that on March 12, 1997, Wyoming Interstate Company, 
Ltd. (WIC), tendered for filing as part of its

[[Page 13605]]

FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 2, a substitute tariff 
sheet, in accordance with the February 26, 1997 letter order in this 
proceeding.
    In the February 26, 1997 letter order, the Commission accepted 
WIC's Substitute Original Sheet No. 84. However, Substitute Original 
Sheet No. 84 had been superseded by First Revised Sheet No. 84 which 
did not contain the right of first refusal language that was accepted 
in the February 26, 1997 order. Consequently, WIC was directed to file 
a revised tariff sheet paginated as Substitute First Revised Sheet No. 
84 which contains the appropriate right of first refusal language.
    WIC states that a copy of this filing was served upon all parties 
in this proceeding.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with the requirements of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211). All such 
protests must be filed in accordance with section 154.210 of the 
Commission's Regulations. Protests filed with the Commission will be 
considered by it in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but 
will not serve to make the protestants parties to the proceedings. 
Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available 
for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-7167 Filed 3-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 11-10851.

#### Hernandez-Hernandez, aka Hernandez *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# t29p01p1
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 57 (Tuesday, March 25, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 14184]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-7452]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES INFORMATION AGENCY

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition; 
Determinations

    This is an amendment to Notice Regarding Culturally Significant 
Objects Imported for Exhibition in the exhibit ``Sepphoris in Galilee: 
Crosscurrents of Culture''. This is to amend Federal Register Doc. 96-
28328, 61 FR 56742 (November 4, 1996) by adding the following language 
after the words ``on or about July 6, 1997,'' to read:

``and at the University of Michigan Museum of Art in Ann Arbor, 
Michigan from on or about September 7, 1997 to on or about December 14, 
1997 and at the Michael C. Carlos Museum at Emory University in 
Atlanta, Georgia from on or about January 24, 1998, to on or about 
April 12, 1998,''.

    Dated: March 19, 1997.
R. Wallace Stuart,
Acting General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 97-7452 Filed 3-24-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8230-01-M
```
Order filed, December 27, 2018

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________
NO. 14

- 18

- 01015

- CV

____________ LOVE & JOY SERVICES, LLC, AND LOVERS EST ATE, LLC , Appellant

V.

UNITY NATIONAL BANK, JC WORRELL'S INSURA NCE AGENCY A/K/A J. CEASE R'S FARMERS INSURANC E AGENCY, JOSE RODRIGUEZ D/B/A A&A CONSTRUCTION MANAGEM ENT CORP.,

AND WATERSTONE LSP, LLC , Appellee

On Appeal from the 80th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2016

- 79109



### ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due December 18, 2018

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record
has not been filed timely, we issue the fol lowing order.

We order Jessica Chang , the official court reporter, to file the record in this
appeal within 30 days of the date of this order

.
PER CURIAM
U.S. Energy Information Administration | Quarterly Coal Report, January - March 2024

Table 17. Average price of U.S. coke exports

(dollars per short ton)

Year to date

Continent and country

of destination

January - March

2024

October - December

2023

January - March

2023 2024 2023

Percent

change

North America Total 434.87 412.38 470.51 434.87 470.51 -7.6

Canada* 392.27 413.87 490.27 392.27 490.27 -20.0

Mexico 715.40 409.02 424.02 715.40 424.02 68.7

Other** 518.42 203.33 738.33 518.42 738.33 -29.8

South America Total 148.78 226.81 454.77 148.78 454.77 -67.3

Brazil - 226.80 454.77 - 454.77 -

Other** 148.78 240.48 - 148.78 - -

Europe Total 77.91 174.66 223.25 77.91 223.25 -65.1

Other** 77.91 174.66 223.25 77.91 223.25 -65.1

Asia Total 593.40 594.11 937.96 593.40 937.96 -36.7

Other** 593.40 594.11 937.96 593.40 937.96 -36.7

Australia and Oceania Total 261.82 256.00 261.82 261.82 261.82 s

Other** 261.82 256.00 261.82 261.82 261.82 s

Total 283.60 374.86 441.03 283.60 441.03 -35.7

* Based on the U.S. - Canada Free Trade Agreement; as of January 1990, the U.S. Department of Commerce began reporting statistics on U.S. exports to Canada based on

information on imports provided monthly by the Canadian government.

** Includes countries with coal exports less than or equal to 50,000 short tons in 2023.

- = No data reported.

s = Absolute percentage less than 0.05.

Note: Total may not equal sum of components because of independent rounding.

Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, 'Monthly Report EM 545.'
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 59 (Thursday, March 27, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 14677]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-7762]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP97-174-001]


Gulf States Transmission, Corporation; Notice of Petition for 
Waiver of GISB Standards and Proposed Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

March 21, 1997.
    Take notice that on March 18, 1997, Gulf States Transmission 
Corporation (GSTC) tendered for filing a petition for waiver of certain 
Gas Industry Standards Board (GISB) standards, first and foremost those 
associated with electronic data interchange and electronic delivery 
mechanism (EDI/EDM) and also capacity release. GSTC also tendered for 
filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original Volume No. 1, certain 
tariff sheets to be effective June 1, 1997.
    GSTC states that the purpose of the filing is to comply with the 
Commission's compliance order issued March 5, 1997 in Docket No. RP97-
174-000.
    GSTC has modified its tariff to (i) incorporate certain Standards 
by reference to number and version of such Standards, (ii) insert, 
verbatim, language from certain other GISB Standards, (iii) change each 
of Mcf to Dekatherms as required by GISB Standard 1.2.2.
    GSTC states that copies of the filing are being mailed to its 
jurisdictional customers and interested state regulatory agencies.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protest must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-7762 Filed 3-26-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### State v. Eisenhour

111,478

06/21/2016

Granted.

Unpubhshed
#### State v. Harbert

111,866

03/28/2016

Denied.

Unpubhshed
**Exhibit
      32(b)**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350**





I,
      Jeffrey R. Passmore, the principal financial officer of Hallmark Financial
      Services, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify that the accompanying report
      on
      Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, and filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934, as amended. I further certify that the information contained in
      the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
      results of operations of the Company.





Date:  August
          9,
          2007
 /s/
                  Jeffrey R. PassmoreJeffrey
                    R. Passmore,
                  Principal
                    Financial Officer
#### Robert Finley HILL, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 74-2876

Summary Calendar.*

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 13, 1975.

Charles J. Pisano, New Orleans, La. (Court-appointed), for plaintiff-appellant.

Gerald J. Gallinghouse, U. S. Atty., Harry R. Hull, Asst. U. S. Atty., New Orleans, La., for respondent-appellee.

Before WISDOM, GOLDBERG and GEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 Rule 18, 5th Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5th Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.

PER CURIAM:

In this § 2255 matter petitioner contends that three invalid prior convictions were considered by the court in assessing a maximum prison term. At an evidentiary hearing held by a magistrate on May 30, 1974, only one of these convictions was found to be invalid; and a recommendation was made that, if the court considered that conviction in imposing sentence, petitioner be resentenced. The court adopted this recommendation, vacated the original sentence, and imposed an identical one without further reference in its judgment to the prior convictions.

 It was beyond the magistrate’s powers to conduct the evidentiary hearing in connection with the determination that only one of the prior convictions was invalid.1 Nor can we view it as insignificant; the court followed his recommendations. On remand, the court should follow the procedure outlined in Lipscomb v. Clark, 468 F.2d 1321, 1323 syl. 3 (5th Cir. 1974).

Vacated and remanded.

1

. Wingo v. Wedding, 418 U.S. 461, 94 S.Ct. 2842, 41 L.Ed.2d 879 (1974).
Exhibit 31.1
 
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 DATE: August 6, 2009
    By:
    /s/ Carl W. HullCarl W. HullPresident and Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 97-6822

TERRANCE ANDRE SMITH,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk.

Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge.

(CR-93-88, CA-97-390-2)

Submitted: July 21, 1998

Decided: August 7, 1998

Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON,

Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________

Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________

COUNSEL

Terrance Andre Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Joseph Seidel, Jr.,

Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________
OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief

on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp.

1998). Appellant's conviction became final on October 14, 1993. On

April 16, 1997, Appellant filed a § 2255 motion. The district court

denied relief because Appellant filed his motion outside the one-year

limitation period imposed by 28 U.S.C.A. § 2244(d) (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). Pursuant to our recent decision in Brown v. Angelone,

___ F.3d ___, Nos. 96-7173, 96-7208, 1998 WL 389030 (4th Cir.

July 14, 1998), Appellant had until April 23, 1997, in which to file

a timely motion. Accordingly, because Appellant filed his § 2255

motion before April 23, 1997, we vacate the district court's order and

remand this case for consideration on the merits. We grant a certificate of appealability on this issue but dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

VACATED AND REMANDED

 2
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connectionwith the amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Rock of Ages Corporation (the"Company") for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, Kurt M. Swenson, as Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

| (1)    |   | The Report fully complies  with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                   |
| (2)    |   | The information contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial  condition and results of operations of the Company. |

 

| /s/Kurt M. Swenson                                                         |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Name: Kurt M. Swenson  Title: Chief Executive  Officer  Date: May 25, 2005 |

 

----

**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connectionwith the amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Rock of Ages Corporation (the"Company") for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, Douglas S. Goldsmith, as Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

| (1)    |   | The Report fully complies  with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                   |
| (2)    |   | The information contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial  condition and results of operations of the Company. |

 

| /s/Douglas S. Goldsmith                                                         |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Name: Douglas S. Goldsmith  Title: Chief Financial  Officer  Date: May 23, 2005 |
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 9, 2015

a1202 

# Order

Clerk December 9, 2015

151930

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 151930

COA: 326225

Lapeer CC: 14

- 012016

- FH

BYRON JAY KONSCHUH,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 8, 2015 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, beca use we are not persuaded

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 61 (Monday, March 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 15194]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-8021]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[AK-962-1410-00-P; AA-6648-K]


Alaska Native Claims Selection

    In accordance with Departmental regulation 43 CFR 2650.7(d), notice 
is hereby given that a decision to issue conveyance under the 
provisions of Sec. 14(a) of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act of 
December 18, 1971, 43 U.S.C. 1601, 1613(a), will be issued to Aleknagik 
Natives Limited, for approximately 1,089.89 acres. The lands involved 
are in the vicinity of Aleknagik, Alaska, within T. 9 S., R. 57 W., 
Seward Meridian, Alaska.
    A notice of the decision will be published once a week, for four 
(4) consecutive weeks, in the Bristol Bay Times. Copies of the decision 
may be obtained by contacting the Alaska State Office of the Bureau of 
Land Management, 222 West Seventh Avenue, #13, Anchorage, Alaska 99513-
7599 ((907) 271-5960).
    Any party claiming a property interest which is adversely affected 
by the decision, an agency of the Federal government or regional 
corporation, shall have until April 30, 1997 to file an appeal. 
However, parties receiving service by certified mail shall have 30 days 
from the date of receipt to file an appeal. Appeals must be filed in 
the Bureau of Land Management at the address identified above, where 
the requirements for filing an appeal may be obtained. Parties who do 
not file an appeal in accordance with the requirements of 43 CFR Part 
4, Subpart E, shall be deemed to have waived their rights.
Terrie D. Evarts,
Land Law Examiner, ANCSA Team, Branch of 962 Adjudication.
[FR Doc. 97-8021 Filed 3-28-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JA-P
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 2 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 2

 Informing the House of Representatives that a quorum of the Senate is 
                               assembled.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 6, 2009

   Mr. Reid (for himself and Mr. McConnell) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Informing the House of Representatives that a quorum of the Senate is 
                               assembled.

    Resolved, That the Secretary inform the House of Representatives 
that a quorum of the Senate is assembled and that the Senate is ready 
to proceed to business.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                                               
<ARTICLE>                                                                 CT
<LEGEND>                                                             
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
financial statements, schedules and other disclosure contained in
Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 1998 of B. F. Saul Real
Estate Investment Trust and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements, schedules and other disclosure.
</LEGEND>                                                    
<MULTIPLIER>                                                              1000
                                                                     
<S>                                                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                                       12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                              SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                                                   SEP-30-1998
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                                     7044581
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                                  516
<PREFERRED>                                                                              0
<COMMON>                                                                              6642
<OTHER-SE>                                                                          (30797)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                                       7044581
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                                         0
<INCOME-TAX>                                                                         42869
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                                 123081
<DISCONTINUED>                                                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                                      (9601)
<CHANGES>                                                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                                                         66124
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                                        12.58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                                        12.58
        

</TABLE>
No. 11-10049.

#### Honesto *v.*Fogel, Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of California, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.