alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 55 (Friday, March 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 13604]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-7168]



[[Page 13604]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP97-123-002]


Kern River Gas Transmission Co.; Notice of Compliance Filing

March 17, 1997.
    Take notice that on March 12, 1997, Kern River Gas Transmission 
Company (Kern River) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1, the tariff sheets listed in 
Appendix 1 to the filing, with an effective data of January 1, 1997.
    Kern River states that the purpose of this filing is to comply with 
the Commission's December 27, 1996 order in Docket No. RP97-123-000.
    Any person desiring to protest filing should file a protest with 
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be as 
provided in section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-7168 Filed 3-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### State v. Alvarez

110,710

04/21/2016

Denied.

Unpublished
# t21p01p1
9. Contacts. Withwhom outside the FAAhasthis proposal been discussed? Organization Person Contacted 

### Date Response !'\ational Business Aircraft Association EliCorti 

# t;/a/if-j

- Regional Airline Association Dave Lotte-rcr 

# c;jU!O'l - Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hnckman 

# L;jZ1t1 

# - ATA Craig Fabian 

# '-/!U!d! 

# -
#### State v. Johnson

109,406 and 16 other cases

06/21/2016

Granted.

Unpubhshed
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

REAPPOINTMENT TO THE DOMESTIC 

RELATIONS PROCEDURAL RULES 

COMMITTEE

:

:

:

:

:

No. 680

CIVIL PROCEDURAL RULES DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 6

th day of April, 2018, Elisabeth Bennington, Esquire, Allegheny 

County, is hereby reappointed as a member of the Domestic Relations Procedural 

Rules Committee for a term expiring July 1, 2021.
#### MIGUEL BELTRAN *v.*COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

(AC 34377)

Beach, Alvord and Flynn, Js.

Argued December 4, 2013

officially released January 7, 2014

Per Curiam.

The appeal is dismissed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-1583

STEVEN PAUL FLEMING,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

HOLY CROSS HOSPITAL,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

CROWNSVILLE HOSPITAL,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-98-

3933-MJG)

Submitted: August 19, 1999 Decided: August 25, 1999

Before WIDENER and KING, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steven Paul Fleming, Appellant Pro Se. David Alan Levin, Mary C.

Rice, WHARTON, LEVIN, EHRMANTRAUT, KLEIN & NASH, Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellee.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Steven Paul Fleming appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action for a lack of jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C.

§§ 1331, 1332 (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Fleming v. Holy

Cross Hospital, No. CA-98-3933-MJG (D. Md. Apr. 8, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# t15p01p1
EXHIBIT 32.1


                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) and
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


     In connection with the filing by Malex, Inc. (the "Company") of the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending October 31, 2006 (the
"Report"), I, Danny Wettreich, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
               and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operation of the Company.







                                               /s/ Danny Wettreich
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Danny Wettreich
                                               Chief Executive Officer


Dated:  November 9, 2006
No. 12-5254.

#### Titus *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



      In  connection   with  the  Quarterly   Report  of  Provident   Bankshares
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, Dennis A.  Starliper,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the  Company,
certify, to the best of my knowledge and belief,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

        1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
             15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        2.   The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
             material   respects,   the  financial   condition  and  results  of
             operations  of the Company as of and for the period  covered by the
             Report.



                               /s/ Dennis A. Starliper
                               Dennis A. Starliper
                               Chief Financial Officer
                               May 14,  2003




       A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906
        HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO PROVIDENT BANKSHARES CORPORATION AND WILL BE
        RETAINED BY PROVIDENT BANKSHARES CORPORATION AND FURNISHED TO THE
          SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST
#### State v. Crowley

111,154

04/21/2016

Denied.

Unpublished
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Provident Bankshares Corporation (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Dennis A. Starliper, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as added by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|             |  |                        
|------------ |  | -----------------------
|             |  | /s/ Dennis A. Starliper
|             |  | Dennis A. Starliper    
|             |  | Chief Financial Officer
|             | 
|May 10, 2007 |  |
### City of Harlingen -- update Moran, David to: Kevin Willis, Stacy Swigart, Elizabeth

Newman 03/26/2012 07:11 PM

Cc: "clyde@svatx.com", "mrclyde_2003@hotmail.com" History: This message has been forwarded.

Dear Kevin, Beth and Stacy: As you have requested, I wanted to update you further on developments undertaken by the City of Harlingen, Valley International Airport . The City has received its bids for the work to be done on the GA North expansion. The bids came in slightly higher that expected. Accordingly, as encouraged and recommended by the Airport Board, the City Commission voted today to allocate an additional $29,000 from the Airport budget to be added to the already approved $150,000 local match portion for a grant application for the North GA expansion. Thus, the City has allocated and approved $179,000 in local match funds for the grant application which is being filed on Tuesday, March 27, 2012. I attach a copy of the grant application for your review (omitted are some exhibits due to size limitations). Also, the Valley International Airport Board voted to award a contract for the apron work, pending the approval of the requested FAA grant funds. We are hopeful that this work commences in relatively short order. We also firmly believe that this action further demonstrates the City's commitment to its grant assurances and we respectfully ask that this additional information be considered as part of the existing Part 16 proceedings. Mr. Kornegay is being copied on this email. Thank you much for your consideration. David David T. Moran Jackson Walker L.L.P. 901 Main Street Suite 6000 Dallas, Texas 75202 214 953-6051 214 661-6677 (fax) dmoran@ jw.com
No. 11-1478.

#### Banks *v.*Ameren UE et al.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
EPA REGISTRATION 

NO.86004-4 

Vol.2 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
 

______________________________________________________________ 

Page is not included in this copy. 

Pages 121 through 127 are not included in this copy. 

_________________________________________________________________ 

The material not included contains the following type of 

information: 

_____ Identity of product inert ingredients. 

__ __ Identity of product impurities. 

__ __ Description of the product manufacturing process. 

__ __ Description of quality control procedures. 

__ __ Identity of the source of product ingredients. 

_____ Sales or other commercial/financial information. 

_____ A draft product label. 

__X__ The product confidential statement of formula. 

_____ Information about a pending registration action. 

__ __ FIFRA registration data. 

__ __ The document is a duplicate of page(s) _ . 

_____ The document is not responsive to the request. 

__ __ Internal deliberative information. 

__ __ Privileged attorney-client communication. 

__ __ Claimed Confidential by submitter upon submission to the 

 Agency.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 14

- 11315 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 3:13

- cr - 00056

- MCR

- 1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus JOSHUA DOUGLAS TAYLOR, Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida

________________________ (June 5, 2015) Before MARCUS , JORDAN and JULIE CARNES , Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Case: 14-11315 Date Filed: 06/05/2015 Page: 1 of 22 Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for Joshua Douglas Taylor in this appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motio n to withdraw is GRANTED , and Taylor’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED

. Case: 14-11315 Date Filed: 06/05/2015 Page: 2 of 2
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.2



          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of FIRST MONTAUK FINANCIAL CORP. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Mindy A. Horowitz, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Mindy A. Horowitz
-----------------------------------
Mindy A. Horowitz
Acting Chief Financial Officer
March 31, 2005
#### State v. Jacobson

111,991

03/31/2016

Denied.

Unpubhshed
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 58 (Wednesday, March 26, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 14450]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-7713]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Group Infrastructure Grants Panel in Mathematical Sciences; 
Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting.

    Name and Committee Code: Special Emphasis panel in Mathematical 
Sciences (1204).
    Date and Time: April 10-12,1997; 8:30 a.m. until 5:00 p.m.
    Place: Room 330, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., 
Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Alvin I. Thaler, Program Director, National 
Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. 
Telephone: (703) 306-1870.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate proposals for the Group 
Infrastructure Grants Program as part of the selection process for 
awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information and financial data, such as salaries and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: March 21, 1997.
Linda Allen-Benton,
Deputy Director, Division of Human Resource Management, Acting 
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-7713 Filed 3-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
Document

Exhibit 10.15
						
	
	





9 July 2021
Private & Confidential
Re: Pension Top Up
Dear Karlis,
Welcome to the XPO family! For your reference, the company offers a pension arrangement in the UK, which is managed by Scottish Widows.
The maximum company contribution payable into the pension scheme is 7% of your basic annual salary.
However, in recognition of both your seniority within the business and market norm for senior executives, the company will provide a top up to your individual pension account of 4% of your basic annual salary.
To qualify to receive the full 11% from the company, your individual contribution must be a minimum of 8% of your basic salary.
The additional contribution will be processed as an individual supplement through payroll, and will be grossed up to offset/mitigate any tax impact which, in turn, needs to be paid into your pension plan in addition to your minimum contribution of 8%. Please see the example below:
															
	EE Contribution	ER Top Up	Total EE Contribution	ER Contribution	Total
	8%	4%	12%	7%	19%


This additional payment will be treated as a revision to your contractual entitlements.
To acknowledge acceptance of this enhancement, please sign and return one copy of this letter to the XPO House address noted below (to my attention).
If you have any queries in relation to this, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Yours sincerely,
Adam Parker
Vice President Human Resources UK & Ireland
Adam.Parker@xpo.com
						
	Signed: /s/ Karlis P. Kirsis
	Date: July 13, 2021



									
	SUPPLY CHAIN - UK AND IRELAND
			
	
	XPO House
Lodge Way, New Duston
Northampton,
NN5 7SL
Tel: 00 44 (0) 1604 737100
www.xpo.com
VAT Reg No. GB 581 3791 20	Supply Chain - UK and Ireland is a trading
name of XPO Supply Chain UK Limited
Registered Office: 16 Charlotte Square,
Edinburgh, EH2 4DF
Registered in Scotland: SC037270	Supply Chain - UK and Ireland is a trading name of
Salvesen Logistics Limited (registered in England:
346268) and TDG (UK) Limited (registered in
England: 540403)
Registered Office: XPO House, Lodge Way,
New Duston, Northampton, NN5 7SL
#### *In re M.H.*

112,769

08/31/2016

Denied.

Unpublished
NOTICE

984816 NO. 69744

THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE 23RD DISTRICT COURT

VS. OF

NIARE QUENETTE LYTE BRAZORIA COUNTY, TEXAS

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT ON APPEAL

ON THE 19TH day of FEBRUARY, 2015, the defendant in the above styled and

numbered cause excepted to the order of the Court i n said cause and gave Notice of Appeal to

the Court of Appeals, FIRST Judicial District.

Date of Judgment or Other Order Appealed From: 12/8 /14

Date of Sentencing: 12//14

Name of Trial Court Judge: BEN HARDIN

Name of Court Reporter: DONNA REED

Name and Address of Defense Attorney on Appeal: D. CRAIG HUGHES (APPOINTED) 7322 SOUTHWEST FREEWAY, SUITE 1100 HOUSTON, TEXAS 77074

Name and Address of Attorney for the State on Appea l: Jeri Yenne, District Attorney Brazoria County Courthouse 111 East Locust, Suite 408-A Angleton, TX 77515

Defendant Incarcerated? YES

Motion for New Trial Filed? 1/6/15

Appeal Bond: N/A Date N/A

Offense and Punishment: MURDER; FIFTY (50) YEARS - TDCJ

RHONDA BARCHAK, District Clerk

By /S/ KATHLEEN MCDOUGALD Deputy
#### BENJAMIN JENKINS *v.*COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

(AC 34351)

DiPentima, C. J., and Robinson and Sheldon, Js.

Submitted on briefs March 22

officially released April 16, 2013

Per Curiam.

The appeal is dismissed.
[ARTICLE] 5
[MULTIPLIER]   1,000
Part II.  Other information,   Item 6a.
Exhibit 11.1

                             READ-RITE CORPORATION
             STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                               Three Months Ended   Nine Months Ended
                                                     June 30,            June 30,
                                              ------------------- -------------------
                                                1997      1996      1997      1996
                                              --------- --------- --------- ---------
<S>                                           <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>
Net income (loss)                              $31,173  ($22,910)  $60,515   $20,948
                                              ========= ========= ========= =========

Weighted average common shares
   outstanding                                  47,636    46,617    47,272    46,757
Common equivalent shares issuable
   under dilutive stock options after
   applying treasury stock method,
   net of tax benefits                           1,327       --      1,354     1,083
                                              --------- --------- --------- ---------
Common and common equivalent
   shares used in computing net
   income per share                             48,963    46,617    48,626    47,840
                                              ========= ========= ========= =========

Net income (loss) per share                      $0.64    ($0.49)    $1.24     $0.44
                                              ========= ========= ========= =========

</TABLE>

<PAGE>
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-60310

Summary Calendar

Consolidated w/ 13-60359

CHARLES P. PRIDE,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

CITY OF BILOXI, MISSISSIPPI; BILOXI COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 

DEPARTMENT; JERRY CREEL, Director Community Development, 

Individually and in his official capacity; TIM CIPPOLA, Individually and in 

his official capacity; MIKE ANDREWS, Individually and in his official 

capacity; UNKNOWN DEFENDANTS; A. J. HOLLOWAY, Mayor of the City 

of Biloxi, in his official capacity; GEORGE LAWRENCE, Alderperson in his 

official capacity; WILLIAM STALLWORTH, Alderperson in his official 

capacity; CHARLES HARRISON, Alderperson in his official capacity; MIKE 

FITZPATRICK, Alderperson in his official capacity; TOM WALL, 

Alderperson in his official capacity; ED GEMMILL, Alderperson in his official 

capacity; DAVID FAYARD, Alderperson in his official capacity; BILOXI 

CODE ENFORCEMENT,

Defendants-Appellees

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 1:10-CV-100

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 15, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 13-60310 Document: 00512502078 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/15/2014
No. 13-60310 c/w. No. 13-60359

Before REAVLEY, JONES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Charles P. Pride brought this action after the City of Biloxi demolished 

a structure on his property and cleared trash and debris from his lot. He 

asserted various civil rights claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a takings 

claim, and various tort and conspiracy claims. The district court dismissed 

most of the claims pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12 and then 

granted summary judgment on the remaining claims. Pride now appeals.

Reviewing the record de novo, see, e.g., Curtis v. Anthony, 710 F.3d 587, 

593 (5th Cir. 2013), we affirm for the same reasons articulated by the district 

court. With the benefit of liberal construction, Pride argues that he suffered 

an unconstitutional taking and that the defendants engaged in a malicious 

enforcement action, resulting in improper demolition and clearing of his lot 

without due process. To the extent that Pride argues there was a taking, the 

district court correctly held that Pride’s claims are not ripe. See Williamson 

Cnty. Reg’l Planning Comm’n v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson City, 473 U.S. 172, 

194-95, 105 S. Ct. 3108, 3120-21 (1985). Furthermore, the record shows that 

the defendants complied with the notice requirements for a code enforcement 

action and demolition under Mississippi law. See Miss. Code Ann. § 21-19-11. 

Pride’s rambling and conclusory arguments to the contrary may not prevent 

summary judgment. See Little v. Liquid Air Corp., 37 F.3d 1069, 1075 (5th 

Cir. 1994) (en banc).

AFFIRMED.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

2

 

 Case: 13-60310 Document: 00512502078 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/15/2014