alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 21.1

                                SYMMETRICOM, INC.

                           SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

Analog Solutions, Inc., a California corporation
Telecom Solutions, Inc. a Delaware corporation
Symmetricom Puerto Rico, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Symmetricom, Ltd., a United Kingdom corporation
Navstar Systems Ltd., a United Kingdom corporation
Manufacturing Solutions (Puerto Rico), Inc., Delaware corporation
Symmetricom Hong Kong, Limited, a Hong Kong corporation
Silicon General International Sales Corporation, a California corporation
Symmetricom Global Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 54 (Thursday, March 20, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 13401]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-7024]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Merit Review Panel for the Experimental Program To Stimulate 
Competitive Research (EPSCoR) Grants: Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Experimental Programs to 
Stimulate Competitive Research (ESPoR), #1198.
    Dates: April 7-8, 1997.
    Times: 11:30 a.m.-6 p.m., April 7, 1997; 8 a.m.-12 noon, April 
8, 1997.
    Place: Wyndham Bristol Hotel, 2430 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20037, (202) 955-6400 FAX: 202-775-8489.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact: Dr. B. Jane Harrington, Program Director, Office of 
Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research (EPSCoR), 
National Science Foundation, Suite 875, 4201 Wilson Blvd., 
Arlington, VA 22230, (703) 306-1683.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to the NSF EPSCoR Grants program for 
financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate science and technology (S&T) 
proposals from states participating in the Experimental Program to 
Stimulate Competitive Research. Proposals request support for 12-24 
month non-renewable EPSCoR grants and are submitted in response to 
NSF solicitation 95-141.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 522b.(c) (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: March 17, 1997.
Linda Allen-Benton,
Deputy Director, Division of Human Resources Management, Acting 
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-7024 Filed 3-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 64 (Thursday, April 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15895-15896]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-8491]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Dkt. C-3698]


Budget Marketing, Inc., et al.; Prohibited Trade Practices, and 
Affirmative Corrective Actions

AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.

ACTION: Consent order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In settlement of alleged violations of federal law prohibiting 
unfair or deceptive acts or practices and unfair methods of 
competition, this consent order prohibits, among other things, an Iowa-
based telemarketer of magazine subscriptions and 11 of its dealers from 
misrepresenting either that they are selling magazines or the cost and 
conditions of the subscriptions they are selling. The consent order 
also prohibits the respondents from: threatening and harassing 
consumers in order to collect payments; failing to honor offers that 
allow cancellation; and

[[Page 15896]]

violating the Electronic Fund Transfer Act.

DATES: Complaint and Order issued December 13, 1996.\1\

    \1\ Copies of the Complaint and the Decision and Order are 
available from the Commission's Public Reference Branch, H-130, 6th 
Street and Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, D.C. 20580.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joseph Koman, FTC/S-4302, Washington, D.C. 20580. (202) 326-3014.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On Friday, October 11, 1996, there was 
published in the Federal Register, 61 FR 53378, a proposed consent 
agreement with analysis In the Matter of Budget Marketing, Inc., et 
al., for the purpose of soliciting public comment. Interested parties 
were given sixty (60) days in which to submit comments, suggestions or 
objections regarding the proposed form of the order.
    No comments having been received, the Commission has ordered the 
issuance of the complaint in the form contemplated by the agreement, 
made its jurisdictional findings and entered an order to cease and 
desist, as set forth in the proposed consent agreement, in disposition 
of this proceeding.

(Sec. 6, 38 Stat. 721; 15 U.S.C. 46. Interpret or apply sec. 5, 38 
Stat. 719, as amended; 15 U.S.C. 45, 1693 et seq.; 12 CFR 205)
Benjamin I. Berman,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-8491 Filed 4-2-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-M
EXHIBIT (3)(a)(2)

                               CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                          of
                        RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                              (PURSUANT TO SECTION 242)




                    Griffin  Gaming  &  Entertainment,  Inc., a corporation
          organized  and  existing  under  and  by  virtue  of  the General
          Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

                    FIRST:  That,  pursuant  to  Section 228 of the General
          Corporation  Law, on January 31, 1997, the Board of Directors and
          Sole   Shareholder  of  the  Corporation  adopted  the  following
          resolution  to amend the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of
          the Corporation:

                    RESOLVED, that Article I of the Restated Certificate of
          Incorporation  of Griffin Gaming & Entertainment, Inc. be amended
          to  change the name of the Corporation to Sun International North
          America, Inc.

                    IN    WITNESS   WHEREOF,   said   Griffin   Gaming   &
          Entertainment,  Inc.  has caused this certificate to be signed by
          Matthew B. Kearney, its Executive Vice President, this 4th day of
          February, 1997.


                                   GRIFFIN GAMING & ENTERTAINMENT, INC.



                                   /s/Matthew B. Kearney               
                                   Matthew B. Kearney
                                   Executive Vice President



              <PAGE>
No. 12-5200.

#### Posados-Aguilera *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 10.30



MEDSTONE INTERNATIONAL, INC.

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

AMENDMENT #2

Chief Executive Officer



This Medstone International, Inc. Employment Agreement Amendment #2 (this Amendment) is entered into effective November 6, 2003, by and between Medstone International, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
(Medstone), and David V. Radlinski (Employee), as the second amendment to the Employment Agreement (the Employment Agreement) dated August 13, 1998, between Medstone and Employee.



Whereas, the original term of the Employment Agreement was to be for five (5)
full years from the effective date of the Employment Agreement, and



Whereas, by prior amendment effective July 24, 2003, the term of the Employment Agreement was extended to expire on December 31, 2003, and



Whereas the parties to the Employment Agreement desire to further extend the term thereof to expire on June 30, 2004,



NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED between Medstone and the Employee that:



(i)  the term of the Employment
Agreement is hereby extended to expire on June 30, 2004;



(ii)  for purposes of Sections 9 (c) and (e) of the Employment Agreement, any qualifying event which would give Employee the right to severance and/or consulting payments, which event occurs during the
extended term of the Employment Agreement, will be deemed to have occurred in the fifth (5th) year of the term of the Employment Agreement;



(iii)  a merger in which Medstone is the surviving corporation but in which the shareholders of Medstone just prior to the
merger are no longer shareholders in Medstone after the merger, shall be an event which gives Employee the right to severance and/or consulting payments under Sections 9 (c) and (e) of the Employment Agreement;



(iv)  the entering into by Employee of an
employment agreement with a buying or a surviving entity shall not be an event which precludes employee from receiving the benefits to which he is otherwise entitled under Sections 9 (c) and (e) of the Employment Agreement as long as the intent and
purpose of such employment agreement is to fulfill the buying partys obligation to retain employee as a consultant or employee under Section 9 (e) of the Employment Agreement; and



(v)  all other terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement remain in full force and effect as
stated in the Employment Agreement, except that such terms and conditions shall be interpreted to effectuate the intents and purposes of this Amendment.



|Medstone International, Inc., A Delaware corporation |  |                                         |  | Employee
|---------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------- |  | --------
|                                                     |  |                                         |  |         
|By:                                                  |  |                                         |  |         
|                                                     |  |                                         |  |         
|                                                     |  | Mark Selawski CFO & Corporate Secretary |  |         

|
|
# Table 7.7

# RSE 7.7

# Microsoft_Word_Document1.docx

# image1.emf

# Microsoft_Word_Document2.docx

# image2.emf
No. 11-1062.

#### Micci *v.*Aleman.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[4910-13-PI DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION



### ~- J ONCURR£NCES O\iTING SY:\ICOl. ACOEgr
•'I I.L".IG 

## [~(i Are 

### &-/0- I !.OtrllNG S\ ~leOl. ACOMgr :-oIlI,'LSrsu; 

## 6-0,£,.)( \lE 

## G/IO/I/ Ol:TI:-'(J';',\r~r;t. /

## Z0~ ~ITI~L"SIt; 

# cOL., 0\1'1; 

### 6

# /10) I

## I 't)f.'TI;".lj S) ".1[ll;L Mll\I.S.~111 ),\11;

" II~ rI ;-.. ••••, 'll!l '1 ~.I n.\L~,,"i'. 1.'lL '1Il-n:,(,S",'.II!I". ~.lll .• l.:"";:1.
l\ Ti "-,I 71.••.•~'.'"1i",1

".1 : ~",_ " ":':

....(:..,'... .:~~ ~ ~ . : ", . :.
:. Amendment 39-*"'***j AD **-**-**1 RIN 2120-AA64 Ainvorthiness Directives; MD Helicopters, Inc. (MDHI) Model MD900 Helicopters AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Final rule; request for comments. SUMMARY: This amendment supersedes an existing ailworthiness directive (AD) for MD Helicopters, Inc. (MDHI) Model MD900 helicopters. That AD currently requires visually inspecting the main rotor lower hub assembly (lower hub) for acrack, anclifyou tind acrack, before further flight, replacing the unainvorthy lower hub with an airworthy lower hub. Additionally, within 10days of tinding acracked lower hub, the existing AD requires reporting the finding to the Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office (LAACO). That AD was prompted by two reports ofcracks detected in the hub in the area near the flex beam bolt hole locations during maintenance on two MDBI Model MD900 helicopters. Since we issued that AD, we determined that one manufacturer had incorrectly inserted flanged bushings into the lower hub bore that resulted in local corrosion, leading to fatigue cracking. Examination of lower hubs from the other manufacturer shows correct bushing installation. Therefore, this amendment limits the applicability to the affected lower hubs; retains the visual inspection but at adifferent compliance time; adds an eddy current inspection; retains the requirement to replace a cracked lower hub with an airworthy lower hub before further flight; and removes the requirement to report to the LAACO. The actions specified by this AD are intended to detect acrack inthe lower hub and prevent failure ofthe lower hub and subsequent loss of control ofthe helicopter. DATES: This AD is effective [INSERT DATE 15 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICA TION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA-2011-XXXXj Directorate Identifier 2011-SW-OOI-ADj
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                               CAMBREX CORPORATION
     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cambrex Corporation (the "Company")
on form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Luke M.
Beshar, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
Section 1350), that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
          15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Dated: November 4, 2005


                                        /s/ Luke M. Beshar
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Luke M. Beshar
                                        Executive Vice President and
                                        Chief Financial Officer


                                       36
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 61 (Monday, March 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15165-15166]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-8020]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Corps of Engineers


Environmental Impact Statement, Black Hawk, Colorado

AGENCY: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.

ACTION: Cancellation of Notice of Intent to prepare an Environmental 
Impact Statement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Corps is issuing this notice to inform the public that an 
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) will not be prepared for the 
proposed

[[Page 15166]]

water supply project in Black Hawk, Colorado. A Notice of Intent to 
Prepare an EIS was published in the Federal Register on December 28, 
1994. Recently the City has proposed to pursue an alternative that will 
allow them to develop a new water supply system that does not require a 
Federal permit. Therefore, an EIS is not required.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions about the cancellation of 
the EIS should be directed to: Ms. Candace Thomas, Chief, Environmental 
Analysis Branch, Planning Division, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 215 
North 17th Street, Omaha, Nebraska 68102-4978; phone (402) 221-4598; 
fax (402) 221-4886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Since the implementation of Limited Stakes 
Gaming in November 1990, the City of Black Hawk has experienced 
substantial growth and increased demands for water. The limited amount 
of water available at the existing diversion points and in North Clear 
Creek is a major constraint to projected growth. The City notified the 
Corps that it intended to apply for a Section 404 permit for 
construction of a new water supply system in waters of the United 
States. The requirement for a Corps 404 permit triggered compliance 
with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). NEPA requires that 
whenever a major Federal action would result in significant impacts to 
the human environment that an EIS be prepared. A Draft EIS was in the 
process of being prepared by the Corps. During the NEPA process several 
alternatives were evaluated. Recently the City has discovered an 
alternative that will allow them to develop a new water supply system 
that does not require a Section 404 permit. Because the 404 process was 
the only Federal nexus, there is now no requirement for NEPA 
compliance. Therefore, the EIS process has been terminated. The current 
plan involves the withdrawal of water from Clear Creek at the Hidden 
Valley exit on Interstate 70 east of Idaho Springs, Colorado. An 
infiltration gallery, pump station, and pipeline can be constructed 
without a permit from the Corps.
Gregory D. Showalter,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-8020 Filed 3-28-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-62-M
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Resource America, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven
J. Kessler, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

    (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                         /s/ Steven J. Kessler
                         ----------------------------------------------------
                         Steven J. Kessler
                         Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
                         December 14, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 67 (Tuesday, April 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 16803]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-8895]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. TM97-4-28-000]


Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company; Notice of Proposed Changes 
in FERC Gas Tariff

April 2, 1997.
    Take notice that on March 31, 1997, Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line 
Company (Panhandle) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
First Revised Volume No. 1, the tariff sheets listed on Appendix A to 
the filing, to become effective May 1, 1997.
    Panhandle states that this filing is made in accordance with 
Section 25 (Flow Through of Cash-Out Revenues In Excess of Costs and 
Scheduling Charges Assessed Against Affiliates) of the General Terms 
and Conditions in Panhandle's FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 
1. The revised tariff sheets filed herewith reflect the following 
changes to Panhandle's currently effective Maximum Reservation Rates 
under Rate Schedules FT, EFT, LFT and SCT, and currently effective 
Maximum commodity rates under Rate Schedules IT and EIT:

    (1) A (.02) per Dt. reduction from the Base Reservation Rate for 
each of the Gathering Charge Rate, Field Zone Transmission Charge 
Rate and Market Zone Access Charge Rate under Rate Schedules FT, EFT 
and LFT;
    (2) A (.13 cents) reduction from the Base Rate per Dt. for each 
of the Gathering Charge Rate, Field Zone Transmission Charge Rate 
and Market Zone Access Charge Rate under Rate Schedule SCT; and
    (3) A (.07 cents) reduction from the Base Rate per Dt. for each 
of the Gathering Charge Rate, Field Zone Transmission Charge Rate 
and Market Zone Access Charge Rate under Rate Schedules IT and EIT.

    Panhandle states that copies of this filing are being served on all 
affected customers and applicable state regulatory agencies.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-8895 Filed 4-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOHNNIE LAMBERT,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

DANTE F. VACCA; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 11-16855

D.C. No. 3:11-cv-00093-RCJRAM

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Robert Jones, Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 17, 2012** 

Before: SCHROEDER, THOMAS, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Nevada state prisoner Johnnie Lambert appeals pro se from the district

court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of its dismissal of his 42

U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. 

FILED

JUL 25 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-16855

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of

discretion. Sch. Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah Cnty., Or. v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255,

1262 (9th Cir. 1993). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for

reconsideration because Lambert failed to show grounds warranting

reconsideration of the court’s decision dismissing Lambert’s complaint on the

basis that it implicated state tort law causes of action rather than Eighth

Amendment deliberate indifference to serious medical needs. See id. at 1263

(setting forth grounds for reconsideration); see also Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d

1051, 1057 (9th Cir. 2004) (negligence is insufficient to establish deliberate

indifference); Nat’l Ass’n for the Advancement of Psychoanalysis v. Cal. Bd. of

Psychology, 228 F.3d 1043, 1049 (9th Cir. 2000) (explaining “we may consider

facts contained in documents attached to the complaint” in determining whether

the complaint states a claim for relief).

Lambert’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive. 

AFFIRMED.
No. D-2681.

#### In re Disbarment of Hennessey.

[For earlier order herein, see 567 U. S. 955.]

Disbarment entered.