alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 57 (Tuesday, March 25, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 14120]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-7431]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Intent To Grant an Exclusive or Partially Exclusive License to 
Allen Telecom Group, Inc., Decibel Products Division

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DOD.

ACTION: Notice of intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with 37 CFR part 404 et seq., the Department of 
the Army hereby gives notice of its intent to grant to ALLEN TELECOM 
GROUP, INC., DECIBEL PRODUCTS DIVISION, a corporation having its 
principle place of business at 8635 Stemmons Freeway, Dallas, Texas 
75247-3701, an exclusive or partially exclusive licenses under U.S. 
Patents 5,486,491, issued 23 Jan 1996, entitled ``Ceramic Ferroelectric 
Composite Material--BSTO-ZRO<INF>2; 5,312,790, issued 17 May 1994, 
entitled ``Ceramic Ferroelectric Material''; and 5,427,988, issued 27 
June 1995, entitled ``Ceramic Ferroelectric Composite Material--BSTO-
MGO''. Anyone wishing to object to the granting of these licenses has 
60 days from the date of this notice to file written objections along 
with supporting evidence, if any.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael D. Rausa, U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Office of Research and 
Technology Applications, ATTN: AMSRL-CS-TT/Bldg. 459, Aberdeen Proving 
Ground, Maryland 21005-5425, Telephone (410) 278-5028.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: None.

Gregory D. Showalter,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-7431 Filed 3-24-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
No. 11-10759.

#### Rivera-Martinez *v.*United States.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit 24.9

                                  POWER OF ATTORNEY


         The undersigned, as a director of Rykoff-Sexton, Inc. (the 
"Company"), does hereby constitute and appoint Mark Van Stekelenburg, 
David F. McAnally and Robert J. Harter, Jr., and each of them, as his true and 
lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and 
resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all 
capacities, to sign the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal 
year ended June 28, 1997 and any and all amendments thereto, and to file the 
same, with exhibits and schedules thereto, and other documents therewith, 
with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said 
attorney-in-fact, full power and authority to do and perform each and every 
act and thing necessary or desirable to be done in and about the premises, as 
fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, thereby 
ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact, or his substitute, 
may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 26th day of 
August, 1997.

                                          /s/ Bernard Sweet                
                                   ------------------------------------
                                              Bernard Sweet
S95A1041.

#### BARBER FERTILIZER COMPANY v. CHASON.

(458 SE2d 631)

Carley, Justice.

A civil action against Barber Fertilizer Company (Barber) was tried before a jury in the Superior Court of Decatur County with Judge Chason (Judge) presiding. A verdict was returned against Barber and a judgment was entered thereon by the Judge. Thereafter, Barber filed this mandamus action against the Judge, alleging that the judgment that had been entered did not conform to the jury’s verdict and that the Judge should be required “to sign the proper judgments in the [civil action] and to void the judgment signed by him. . . .” The mandamus action was assigned to another judge of the trial court, who dismissed it on the ground that Barber had an adequate remedy at law. It is from that order dismissing its mandamus action against the Judge that Barber brings this appeal.

Mandamus is available only “if there is no other specific legal remedy. . . .” OCGA § 9-6-20.

> Where there is a right of judicial review of the act of a judicial officer, mandamus is not an available remedy to require him to perform his judicial function in a manner different from the way he has performed it. [Cits.]

*Rossi v. Price,*237 Ga. 651, 652 (229 SE2d 429) (1976). Clearly, Barber had the right to appeal from the judgment entered by the Judge on the jury’s verdict and urge that such judgment did not conform to that verdict. See generally *First American Bank v. Bishop,*244 Ga. 317, 320 (3) (260 SE2d 49) (1979). In fact, Barber did file an appeal *498from that judgment and that case is pending in the Court of Appeals. A trial court’s entry of judgment on a jury’s verdict “is a Judicial Act; and to reverse it, appeal, and not mandamus, is the proper remedy.” *Barksdale v.*Cobb, 16 Ga. 13 (2) (1854). It follows that the trial court correctly dismissed Barber’s mandamus action against the Judge.

Decided June 29, 1995.

*Smith & Perry, Ralph C. Smith, Jr.,*for appellant.

*J. Brown Moseley, District Attorney, Michael J. Bowers, Attorney General, Stephanie B. Manis, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Thomas K. Bond, Assistant Attorney General,*for appellee.

*Kevin R. Dean, T. Craig Earnest,*amicus curiae.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
Presidential Documents

13531

Federal Register

Vol. 62, No. 55

Friday, March 21, 1997

Title 3—

The President

Presidential Determination No. 97–19 of March 11, 1997

Eligibility of NIS Countries: Georgia, Kazakstan, Kyrgyzstan,

Moldova, Russia, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, and Uzbekistan To

Be Furnished Defense Articles and Services Under the Foreign Assistance Act and the Arms Export Control Act

Memorandum for the Secretary of State

Pursuant to the authority vested in me by section 503(a) of the Foreign

Assistance Act of 1961, as amended, and section 3(a)(1) of the Arms Export

Control Act, I hereby find that the furnishing of defense articles and services

to the Governments of Georgia, Kazakstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova,

Turkmenistan, Russia, Ukraine, and Uzbekistan will strengthen the security

of the United States and promote world peace.

You are authorized and directed to report this finding to the Congress

and to publish it in the 

œ–

Federal Register.

THE WHITE HOUSE,

Washington, March 11, 1997. [FR Doc. 97–7385

Filed 3–20–97; 8:45 am]

Billing code 4710–10–P
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 242 

Supporting the goals and ideals of ‘‘National Aerospace Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 5, 2009 

Mr. VOINOVICH (for himself and Mr. NELSON of Florida) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce, 

Science, and Transportation 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of ‘‘National Aerospace 

Day’’. 

Whereas the missions to the moon by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration are recognized around 

the globe as 1 of the most outstanding achievements of 

humankind; 

Whereas the United States is a leader in the International 

Space Station, the most advanced human habitation and 

scientific laboratory ever placed in space; 

Whereas the first aircraft flight occurred in the United 

States, and the United States operates the largest and 

safest aviation system in the world; 

Whereas the United States aerospace industry is a powerful, 

reliable source of employment, innovation, and export inVerDate Nov 24 2008 01:54 Aug 06, 2009 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\SR242.IS SR242

wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 242 IS 

come, directly employing 831,000 people and supporting 

more than 2,000,000 jobs in related fields; 

Whereas space exploration is a source of inspiration that captures the interest of young people; 

Whereas aerospace education is an important component of 

science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education and helps to develop the science and technology 

workforce in the United States; 

Whereas aerospace innovation has led to the development of 

advanced meteorological forecasting, which has saved 

lives around the world; 

Whereas aerospace innovation has led to the development of 

the Global Positioning System, which has strengthened 

national security and increased economic productivity; 

Whereas the aerospace industry assists and protects members 

of the Armed Forces with military communications, unmanned aerial systems, situational awareness, and satellite-guided ordinances; and 

Whereas September 16, 2009, is an appropriate date to observe ‘‘National Aerospace Day’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) supports the goals and ideals of ‘‘National 

3 Aerospace Day’’; and 

4 (2) recognizes the contributions of the aero5 space industry to the history, economy, security, and 

6 educational system of the United States. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
No. 12-5072.

#### Elam *v.*Denney, Warden.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1



                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                        18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
              SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Santa Fe Financial Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I John V. Winfield, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
    15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Company.


Date: October 8, 2004                           /s/ John V. Winfield
                                                ----------------------------
                                                John V. Winfield, President
                                                and Chief Executive Officer




[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Santa Fe Financial Corporation and will be retained by Santa Fe
Financial Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.]
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 9 (Tuesday, January 14, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 1827]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-845]



========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents 
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed 
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published 
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. 
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each 
week.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 9 / Tuesday, January 14, 1997 / Rules 
and Regulations

[[Page 1827]]



DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 96-ACE-11]


Amendment to Class E Airspace, Sioux City, IA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This section corrects an inadvertent typographical error in 
the effective date of a final rule, correction that was published in 
the Federal Register on November 29, 1996 (61 FR 60526) Airspace Docket 
No. 96-ACE-11.

EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 UTC, January 30, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kathy Randolph, Operations Branch, ACE-530C, Federal Administration, 
601 E. 12th St., Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone (816) 426-3408.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

    The FAA published a direct final rule correction in the Federal 
Register on November 29, 1996 (61 FR 60526). In order to meet the 
publication date of the Omaha Sectional Aeronautical Chart, the 
effective date has been corrected to January 30, 1997.

Correction to Final Rule

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the 
effective date for the Class E Airspace area at Sioux City, IA as 
published in the Federal Register on November 29, 1996, (61 FR 60526) 
(Federal Register Document 96-30520; page 60526, column 3) is corrected 
as follows:


Sec. 71.71  [Corrected]

* * * * *

ACE IA E5 Sioux City, IA [Corrected]

    By Removing ``Effective Date: 0901 UTC, January 31, 1997,'' and 
substituting ``Effective Date: 0901 UTC, January 30, 1997''.
* * * * *
    Issued in Kansas City, MO, on December 6, 1996.
H.J. Lyons, Jr.,
Manager, Air Traffic Division, Central Region.
[FR Doc. 97-845 Filed 1-13-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 8 (Monday, January 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 1745]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-764]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP96-129-000]


Trunkline Gas Company; Notice of Informal Settlement Conference

January 8, 1997.
    Take notice that an informal settlement conference will be convened 
in these proceedings on January 15, 1997 at 10:00 a.m. at the offices 
of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C., 20426, for the purpose of exploring the possible 
settlement of the issues in this proceeding.
    Any party, as defined by 18 CFR 385.102(c), or any participant as 
defined by 18 CFR 385.102(b), is invited to attend. Persons wishing to 
become a party must move to intervene and receive intervenor status 
pursuant to the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 385.214).
    For additional information, contact Marc G. Denkinger (202) 208-
2215 or Lorna J. Hadlock (202) 208-0737.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-764 Filed 1-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 57 (Tuesday, March 25, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 14134]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-7419]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. CP97-287-000]


Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company; Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

March 19, 1997.
    Take notice that on March 13, 1997, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company 
(Tennessee), Post Office Box 2511, Houston, Texas 77252, filed a 
request with the Commission in Docket No. CP97-287-000, pursuant to 
Sections 257.205, and 157.212 of the Commission's Regulations under the 
Natural Gas Act (NGA) for authorization to modify an existing receipt 
point to include delivery capabilities for CXY Energy, Inc. (CXY) 
authorized in blanket certificate issued in Docket No. CP82-413-000, 
all as more fully set forth in the request on file with the Commission 
and open to public inspection.
    Tennessee proposes to reconfigure existing Receipt Meter No. 1-
1069-1, to add delivery capabilities of up to 1,000 Dekatherms per day 
of natural gas for CXY's gas lift operations. Tennessee would continue 
to own, operate and maintain the meter and would install own, and 
operate the tie-in piping needed to create a piping manifold. CXY would 
own all downstream piping and control the shut-down valve downstream of 
the meter. CXY would reimburse Tennessee the cost to modify this 
receipt point which is estimated to be $28,300.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after the 
Commission has issued this notice, file pursuant to Rule 214 of the 
Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to intervene or 
notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of the 
Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to the request. If 
no protest is filed within the allowed time, the proposed activity 
shall be deemed to be authorized effective the day after the time 
allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed and not withdrawn 
within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a protest, the instant 
request shall be treated as an application for authorization pursuant 
to Section 7 of the NGA.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-7419 Filed 3-24-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# m94_65
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               FEB-28-2001
<PERIOD-START>                  MAR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    AUG-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                            1
<CASH>                               598,553
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                     10,958,079
<ALLOWANCES>                         613,000
<INVENTORY>                       11,042,539
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  23,793,176
<PP&E>                            11,406,492
<DEPRECIATION>                     4,845,969
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    34,485,137
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              4,652,160
<BONDS>                            5,438,992
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                              58,675
<OTHER-SE>                        23,748,990
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      34,485,137
<SALES>                           24,435,707
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  24,435,707
<CGS>                             16,948,134
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     16,948,134
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   558,935
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      274,756
<INCOME-TAX>                         105,517
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  169,239
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                         169,239
<EPS-BASIC>                            .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                            .03



</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6270

TERRY J. MOORE,
Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.
J. MILLER, Corrections Officer; A. TAYLOR, Corrections Officer; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BROWN; SERGEANT DAY,
Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (7:08-cv-00614-gec-mfu)

Submitted: October 14, 2009 Decided: November 2, 2009

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terry J. Moore, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Terry J. Moore appeals the district court’s orders
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915A(b) (2006) and denying his mo tion for reconsideration.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Moore v. Miller , No. 7:08-cv-00614-gec-mfu (W.D. Va.
Jan. 15, 2009; Feb. 11, 2009). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.

AFFIRMED
i i i i i i



### MEM ORA ND UM OP INION No

. 04 -1 0- 00 13 9- CR Marisa ANG UIANO , Appellant

v . T h e STA TE of

Te xas, Appellee Fr om the 227th J udicial District Court, Be x ar County , Texas

Trial Court No. 2007CR5593W Honora ble Phili p A. Kazen, Jr., J udg e Presiding PER C URI AM Sitt ing: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Just ice Marialy n Ba rnar d, J ustice Deliver ed and F iled: March 3, 2010 DI SMI SSED Marisa A ng uiano filed a

notice of a

ppeal se eking t o ap p eal f rom a sente nce imposed on October 29, 2007. The judg ment was in acc ordanc e with Ang uiano’s plea barg ain ag ree ment, and the re c or d d oe s n ot c on ta in a tr ia l c ou rt ’s c e rt ificat io n sho wi ng An g uia no ha s th e ri g ht o f a

pp e a l. Acc ording ly , the appe al is dismis sed. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 25.2(d). PER C URI AM DO NO T PU B L I SH
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 02, 2015.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, July 02, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A15I0222. CALVIN THOMPSON et al. v. ANTHONY AVERY et al..

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this

order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

13CV4611 14CV1162
# Table 7.4
##### 



Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), each of the
undersigned officers of CAM Commerce Solutions, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify with
respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the 10-Q Report) that to their knowledge:  (1)
    the 10-Q Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    the information contained in the 10-Q Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Geoffrey D. KnappGeoffrey D. KnappChief Executive OfficerMay 13, 2005
 /s/ Paul Caceres, Jr.Paul Caceres, Jr.Chief Financial and Accounting OfficerMay 13, 2005
 This certification accompanies this 10-Q Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for the purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 9, 2018

No. 04-18-00444-CV

David VILLARREAL,

Appellant

v.

Jonabelle JOSIANE, et al.,

Appellee

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CI18748

Honorable Michael E. Mery, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellee’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief has this date been received 

and filed in the above styled and numbered cause. Extension of time to file the Appellee’s brief 

is this date GRANTED. Time is extended to January 4, 2019.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: __________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court

cc: Tom Hall

Law Office of Thomas C. Hall, P.C.

115 East Travis Street

suite 700

San Antonio, TX 78205

Gregg R. Miller

Clark, Miller & Campbell

300 Convent

ste 2350

San Antonio, TX 78205

Thomas F. Nye

Gault, Nye & Quintana, L.L.P.

P.O. Box 6666

Corpus Christi, TX 78466