Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 66 / Monday, April 7, 1997 / Notices 16641

Installation of U.S.-model headlamp

assemblies; (b) installation of U.S.-

model front and rear sidemarker/

reflector assemblies; (c) installation of

U.S.-model taillamp assemblies.

Standard No. 111 Rearview Mirror:

Replacement of the convex passenger

side rearview mirror.

Standard No. 114 Theft Protection:

Installation of a warning buzzer

microswitch in the steering lock

assembly and a warning buzzer.

Standard No. 118 Power Window

Systems: Rewiring of the power window

system so that the window transport is

inoperative when the ignition is

switched off.

Standard No. 120 Tire Selection and

Rims: Installation of a tire information

placard.

Standard No. 208 Occupant Crash

Protection: (a) Installation of a U.S.

model seat belt in the driver’s position,

or a belt webbing actuated microswitch

inside the driver’s seat belt retractor; (b)

installation of an ignition switch

actuated seat belt warning lamp and

buzzer. The petitioner states that the

vehicle is equipped with a combination

lap and shoulder restraint that adjusts

by means of an automatic retractor and

releases by means of a single push

button in each front designated seating

position, with a combination lap and

shoulder restraint that releases by

means of a single push button in each

rear outboard designated seating

position, and with a lap belt in the rear

center designated seating position.

Standard No. 301 Fuel System

Integrity: Installation of a rollover valve

in the fuel tank vent line.

The petitioner also states that a

vehicle identification number plate

must be affixed to the vehicle to meet

the requirements of 49 CFR part 565.

Interested persons are invited to

submit comments on the petition

described above. Comments should refer

to the docket number and be submitted

to: Docket Section, National Highway

Traffic Safety Administration, Room

5109, 400 Seventh Street, SW.,

Washington, DC 20590. It is requested

but not required that 10 copies be

submitted.

All comments received before the

close of business on the closing date

indicated above will be considered, and

will be available for examination in the

docket at the above address both before

and after that date. To the extent

possible, comments filed after the

closing date will also be considered.

Notice of final action on the petition

will be published in the Federal

Register pursuant to the authority

indicated below.

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A) and

(b)(1); 49 CFR 593.8; delegations of authority

at 49 CFR 1.50 and 501.8.

Issued on: April 2, 1997.

Marilynne Jacobs,

Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.

[FR Doc. 97–8823 Filed 4–4–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–59–P

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Research and Special Programs

Administration

[Docket No. RSPA–97–2236; Notice 1]

Liquefied Natural Gas Facilities

Petition for Waiver; Pine Needle LNG

Company

Pine Needle LNG Company (Pine

Needle) has petitioned the Research and

Special Programs Administration

(RSPA) for a waiver from compliance

with 49 CFR 193.2155(c), Liquefied

Natural Gas (LNG) storage tank

impounding system. Section

193.2155(c) requires a Class 1

impounding system whenever an LNG

storage tank is located within 20,000

feet from the nearest runway serving

large aircraft. The petition applies to the

Pine Needle’s proposed LNG storage

facility in the northwest Guilford

County, North Carolina.

The petitioner’s rationale for the

waiver from compliance rests on the

following reasons:

1. A horizontal distance between the

nearest Pine Needle LNG tank and the

nearest point of the Landmark Airpark

runway is approximately 19,500 feet.

This is 500 feet less than the 20,000 foot

offset required for compliance with

§ 193.2155(c).

2. A vertical clearance of an aircraft

over the top of the Pine Needle earthen

containment dikes would be 1023 feet,

after factoring in a minimum airport

approach/departure ratio of 20:1 to/from

Landmark Airpark and the elevation

differences between the Landmark

Airpark runway and the Pine Needle

location. This exceeds the minimum

requirements under the Federal

Aviation Administration (FAA)

regulations.

3. Correspondence between FAA and

the Landmark Airpark developer

describes operation of the Landmark

Airpark as being limited to private

aircraft under visual flight rules (VFR)

conditions.

4. The turf runway surface and 2600-

foot runway length would likely

preclude large aircraft, as defined by 14

CFR Part 1.1, from using the Landmark

Airpark.

5. Pine Needle owns, leases or

controls all properties within the

exclusion zones required under 49 CFR

193.2057 and 193.2059. There is

presently no development within the

prescribed exclusion zones. Pine Needle

will allow no development within the

required exclusion zones which would

be inconsistent with the requirements of

§§ 193.2057 and 193.2059.

6. The Class 2 impounding system

proposed for the Pine Needle LNG

storage tanks would remain intact in the

event of a large aircraft impact, and with

a design volume of 150% of tank

capacity would meet the volumetric

requirements of § 193.2181(a).

7. The earthen dikes, in combination

with hilly terrain and the undeveloped

safety exclusion zones around the

facility would adequately provide for

hazard containment.

Because of the unusual circumstances

described above at Pine Needle’s

proposed LNG facility, located 19,500

feet from the nearest point of the

Landmark Airpark runway, suitable for

landing smaller aircrafts and any larger

aircrafts that could reasonably use this

facility, relatively low risk to the public

safety due to combination of Class 2

earthen dikes in a hilly terrain with

150% volumetric capacity, and

undeveloped safety exclusion zones

around facility owned and controlled by

the Pine Needle, RSPA believes that

granting a waiver from the requirements

of 49 CFR 193.2155(c) would not be

inconsistent with pipeline safety, nor

would it lessen public safety in this

case. The operator must comply with all

other requirements of Part 193.

Therefore, RSPA proposes to grant the

waiver.

Interested parties are invited to

comment on the proposed waiver by

submitting in duplicate such data,

views, or arguments as they may desire.

Comments should identify the docket

number and the RSPA rulemaking

number. Comments should be addressed

to the Docket Facility, U.S. Department

Of Transportation, plaza 401, 400

Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC

20590–0001.

All comments received before May 7,

1997 will be considered before final

action is taken. Late filed comments will

be considered so far as practicable. No

public hearing is contemplated, but one

may be held at a time and place set in

a notice in the Federal Register if

required by an interested person

desiring to comment at a public hearing

and raising a genuine issue. All

comments and other docketed material

will be available for inspection and

copying in room 401 Plaza between the
16642 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 66 / Monday, April 7, 1997 / Notices

hours of 10:00 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday

through Friday, except Federal holidays.

Authority: 49 App. U.S.C. 2002(h) and

2015; and 49 CFR 1.53.

Issued in Washington, DC, on April 1,

1997.

Richard B. Felder,

Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety.

[FR Doc. 97–8745 Filed 4–4–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–60–P

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Submission for OMB Review;

Comment Request

March 28, 1997.

The Department of Treasury has

submitted the following public

information collection requirement(s) to

OMB for review and clearance under the

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,

Public Law 104–13. Copies of the

submission(s) may be obtained by

calling the Treasury Bureau Clearance

Officer listed. Comments regarding this

information collection should be

addressed to the OMB reviewer listed

and to the Treasury Department

Clearance Officer, Department of the

Treasury, Room 2110, 1425 New York

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

Departmental Office/Community

Development Financial Institution

(CDFI) Fund

Special Request: In order to make this

application available to the public by no

later than April 4, 1997, the Department

of the Treasury is requesting that the

Office of Management and Budget

(OMB) review and approve this

information collection by April 1, 1997.

To obtain a copy of this application,

please contact the Community

Development Financial Institution

(CDFI) Fund at (202) 622–8662.

OMB Number: 1505–0154.

Form Number: CDFI–0001.

Type of Review: Revision.

Title: Community Development

Financial Institutions Program, Notice

of Funds Availability (NOFA),

Regulations and Application.

Description: The CDFI Program

documents will be used to invite

applications and award funds for the

Program. Information collected will be

used to determine eligibility for an

award, according to relevant law and

regulation.

Respondents: Business or other forprofit, Not-for-profit institutions.

Estimated Number of Respondents/

Recordkeepers: 300.

Estimated Burden Hours Per

Respondent/Recordkeeper: 100 hours.

Frequency of Response: Quarterly.

Estimated Total Reporting/

Recordkeeping Burden: 30,000 hours.

Clearance Officer: Lois K. Holland

(202) 622–1563, Departmental Offices,

Room 2110, 1425 New York Avenue,

NW., Washington, DC 20220.

OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt

(202) 395–7860, Office of Management

and Budget, Room 10202, New

Executive Office Building, Washington,

DC 20503.

Lois K. Holland,

Departmental Reports Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 97–8725 Filed 4–4–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810–25–P

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Submission for OMB Review;

Comment Request

March 31, 1997.

The Department of Treasury has

submitted the following public

information collection requirement(s) to

OMB for review and clearance under the

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,

Public Law 104–13. Copies of the

submission(s) may be obtained by

calling the Treasury Bureau Clearance

Officer listed. Comments regarding this

information collection should be

addressed to the OMB reviewer listed

and to the Treasury Department

Clearance Officer, Department of the

Treasury, Room 2110, 1425 New York

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

Special Request: In order to conduct

the focus group study described below

in late April 1997, the Department of the

Treasury is requesting that the Office of

Management and Budget (OMB) review

and approve this information collection

by April 9, 1997. To obtain a copy of

this study, please contact the Internal

Revenue Service Clearance Officer at the

address listed below.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

OMB Number: 1545–1432.

Project Number: PC:V 97–008–G.

Type of Review: Revision.

Title: Form 1040 With Remittance

Focus Group Study.

Description: The objective of the focus

group study is to gather information on

taxpayer reactions to the different

mailing concepts as well as information

on the burden associated with each

concept.

Respondents: Individuals or

households, Business or other for-profit.

Estimated Number of Respondents:

80.

Estimated Burden Hours Per

Response:

Interviews .............................................3 hours

Recruiting .........................................5 minutes

Frequency of Response: Other.

Estimated Total Reporting Burden:

480 hours.

Clearance Officer: Garrick Shear (202)

622–3869, Internal Revenue Service,

Room 5571, 1111 Constitution Avenue,

NW., Washington, DC 20224.

OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt

(202) 395–7860, Office of Management

and Budget, Room 10226, New

Executive Office Building, Washington,

DC 20503.

Lois K. Holland,

Departmental Reports Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 97–8726 Filed 4–4–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Submission for OMB Review;

Comment Request

March 31, 1997.

The Department of the Treasury has

submitted the following public

information collection requirement(s) to

OMB for review and clearance under the

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,

Public Law 104–13. Copies of the

submission(s) may be obtained by

calling the Treasury Bureau Clearance

Officer listed. Comments regarding this

information collection should be

addressed to the OMB reviewer listed

and to the Treasury Department

Clearance Officer, Department of the

Treasury, Room 2110, 1425 New York

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

Special Request: In order to conduct

the focus group study described below

in late April 1997, the Department of the

Treasury is requesting that the Office of

Management and Budget (OMB) review

and approve this information collection

by April 11, 1997. To obtain a copy of

this study, please contact the Internal

Revenue Service Clearance Officer at the

address listed below.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

OMB Number: 1545–1432.

Project Number: M:SP:V 97–009–G.

Type of Review: Revision.

Title: Customer Service Performance

Development System (PDS)

Implementation Customer Satisfaction

Survey.

Description: This project will result in

the establishment of two data bases. One

data base will contain the knowledges,

skills, and attributes needed by the

organization to accomplish its work

(Business Competencies). The other data

base will contain the certified

knowledges, skills, and attributes of

individual employees (Employee

Competencies). These data bases will