Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 70 / Friday, April 11, 1997 / Notices 17901

2 15 U.S.C. § 78s(b)(2) (1988). 3 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12) (1996).

prevent fraudulent and manipulative

acts and practices, to promote just and

equitable principles of trade, to remove

impediments to and perfect the

mechanism of a free and open market

and a national market system, and, in

general, to protect investors and the

public interest.

In addition, the Commission believes

the Exchange’s policy requiring

notification by member organizations

when they are participating in an

offering of securities listed on the

Exchange will facilitate compliance of

Exchange members with the

requirements of Regulation M, SEC

Rules 100 through 105, and Rule 10b–

13 under the Act. The Commission,

therefore, finds good cause for

approving the proposed rule change

prior to the thirtieth day after the date

of publication of filing thereof in the

Federal Register.

It is therefore ordered, pursuant to

Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,2 that the

proposed rule change be and hereby is

approved.

For the Commission, by the Division of

Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated

authority.3

Margaret H. McFarland,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97–9348 Filed 4–10–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010–01–M

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION

Information Collection Activities:

Proposed Collection Requests and

Comment Requests

This notice lists information

collection packages that will require

submission to the Office of Management

and Budget (OMB), as well as

information collection packages

submitted to OMB for clearance, in

compliance with PL. 104–13 effective

October 1, 1995, The Paperwork

Reduction Act of 1995.

I. The Information Collection(s) Listed

Below Require(s) Extension(s) of the

Current OMB Approval(s) or Are

Proposed New Collection(s)

1. Certification by Religious Group—

0960–0093. The information collected

by the Social Security Administration

on form SSA–1458 is used to determine

if the religious group of which an

individual is a member qualifies for a

self-employment tax exemption under

Section 1402(g) of the Internal Revenue

Code. The respondents are

spokespersons for religious groups.

Number of Respondents: 180.

Frequency of Response: 1.

Average Burden Per Response: 15

minutes.

Estimated Annual Burden: 45 hours.

2. RSI/DI Quality Review Case

Analysis Questionnaires and Annual

Earnings Test Questionnaire—0960–

0189. The information collected on

forms SSA–2930, SSA–2931 and SSA–

2932 is used by the Social Security

Administration to establish a national

payment accuracy rate for all cases in

payment status and to serve as a source

of information regarding problem areas

in the Retirement and Survivors

Insurance (RSI) program and Disability

Insurance (DI) programs. The

information is also used to measure the

accuracy rate for newly adjudicated RSI/

DI cases. The information collected on

form SSA–4659 is used to evaluate the

annual earnings test (AET) process to

determine the effectiveness of the AET

process. The results will be used to

develop ongoing improvements in the

process. The respondents are RSI and DI

beneficiaries.

SSA–2930 SSA–2931 SSA–2932 SSA–4659

Number of Respondents .......................................................................................... 5,500 2,750 1,375 740

Frequency of Response ........................................................................................... 1 1 1 1

Average Burden Per Response (minutes) ............................................................... 20 30 30 20

Estimated Annual Burden (hours) ............................................................................ 1,833 1,375 688 247

Written comments and

recommendations regarding the

information collection(s) should be sent

within 60 days from the date of this

publication, directly to the SSA Reports

Clearance Officer at the following

address:

Social Security Administration, DCFAM,

Attn: Judith T. Hasche, 6401 Security Blvd.,

1–A–21 Operations Bldg., Baltimore, MD

21235.

In addition to your comments on the

accuracy of the agency’s burden

estimate, we are soliciting comments on

the need for the information; its

practical utility; ways to enhance its

quality, utility and clarity; and on ways

to minimize burden on respondents,

including the use of automated

collection techniques or other forms of

information technology.

II. The Information Collection(s) Listed

Below Have Been Submitted to OMB

1. Appointment of Representative—

0960–0527. The information collected

on form SSA–1696 is used by the Social

Security Administration to verify the

applicant’s appointment of a

representative. It allows SSA to inform

the representative of items which affect

the applicant’s claim. The respondents

are applicants who notify SSA that they

have appointed a person to represent

them and such representatives when

claiming a right or benefit.

Number of Respondents: 475,737.

Frequency of Response: 1.

Average Burden Per Response: 10

minutes.

Estimated Annual Burden: 72,290

hours.

2. Information About Joint Checking/

Savings Account—0960-0461. The

information collected on form SSA–

2574 by the Social Security

Administration is used to determine

whether a joint bank account should be

counted as a resource of an SSI claimant

or applicant in determining eligibility

for SSI. The respondents are applicants

for and recipients of SSI payments and

individuals who are joint owners of

financial accounts with SSI applicants/

recipients.

Number of Respondents: 200,000

Frequency of Response: 1

Average Burden Per Response: 7

minutes

Estimated Annual Burden: 23,333

hours

3. Social Security Non-Applicant,

Applicant and Advisor Surveys on the

Supplemental Security Income and

Social Security Disability Programs—

0960–NEW. SSA will conduct a pilot

study to obtain information on the

factors that motivate individuals to file

for disability benefits. The purpose of

this project is to provide SSA with an

appropriate methodology to conduct a

scientific survey of disability applicants,

non-applicants and disability advisors

to determine the types and sources of
17902 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 70 / Friday, April 11, 1997 / Notices

information that disabled and impaired

individuals utilize in making their

decisions to apply or not to apply for

benefits. The data will be used to

determine the appropriateness and

accuracy of the information provided to

potential applicants and to identify the

social networks through which

information about the disability

programs is disseminated.

Screener survey

Pilot

survey

Number of Respondents .. 1,000 200

Frequency of Response ... 1 1

Average Burden Per Response (minutes) .......... 12 60

Estimated Annual Burden

(hours) ........................... 200 200

Written comments and

recommendations regarding the

information collection(s) should be

directed within 30 days to the OMB

Desk Officer and SSA Reports Clearance

Officer at the following addresses:

(OMB), Office of Management and

Budget, OIRA, Attn: Laura

Oliven,New Executive Office

Building, Room 10230, 725 17th St.,

NW, Washington, D.C. 20503

(SSA), Social Security Administration,

DCFAM, Attn: Judith T. Hasche, 1–A–

21 Operations Bldg., 6401 Security

Blvd., Baltimore, MD 21235

To receive a copy of any of the forms

or clearance packages, call the SSA

Reports Clearance Officer on (410) 965–

4123 or write to her at the address listed

above.

Dated: April 3, 1997.

Judith T. Hasche,

Reports Clearance Officer, Social Security

Administration.

[FR Doc. 97–8989 Filed 4–8–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4190–29–P

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Noise Exposure Map Notice; Receipt of

Noise Compatibility Program and

Request for Review; Naples Municipal

Airport; Naples, FL

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA) announces its

determination that the revised current

and future noise exposure maps

submitted by the City of Naples, Florida

for Naples Municipal Airport under the

provisions of Title I of the Aviation

Safety and Noise Abatement Act of 1979

(Public Law 96–193) and 14 CFR Part

150 are in compliance with applicable

requirements. The FAA also announces

that it is reviewing a proposed revised

noise compatibility program that was

submitted for Naples Municipal Airport

under Part 150 in conjunction with the

noise exposure maps, and that this

revised program will be approved or

disapproved on or before September 29,

1997.

EFFECTIVE DATE: The effective date of the

FAA’s determination on the revised

noise exposure maps and of the start of

its review of the associated revised

noise compatibility program is April 2,

1997. The public comment period ends

June 1, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Tommy J. Pickering, P.E., Federal

Aviation Administration, Orlando

Airports District Office, 5950 Hazeltine

National Drive, Suite 400, Orlando,

Florida 32822–5024, (407) 812–6331,

Extension 29. Comments on the

proposed revised noise compatibility

program should also be submitted to the

above office.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This

notice announces that the FAA finds

that the revised noise exposure maps

submitted for Naples Municipal Airport

are in compliance with applicable

requirements of Part 150, effective April

2, 1997. Further, FAA is reviewing a

proposed revised noise compatibility

program for that airport which will be

approved or disapproved on or before

September 29, 1997. This notice also

announces the availability of this

revised program for public review and

comment.

Under Section 103 of Title I of the

Aviation Safety and Noise Abatement

Act of 1979 (hereinafter referred to as

‘‘the Act’’), an airport operator may

submit to the FAA noise exposure maps

which meet applicable regulations and

which depict noncompatible land uses

as of the date of submission of such

maps, a description of projected aircraft

operations, and the ways in which such

operations will affect such maps. The

Act requires such maps to be developed

in consultation with interested and

affected parties to the local community,

government agencies, and persons using

the airport.

An airport operator who has

submitted noise exposure maps that are

found by FAA to be in compliance with

the requirements of Federal Aviation

Regulations (FAR) Part 150,

promulgated pursuant to Title I of the

Act, may submit a noise compatibility

program for FAA approval which sets

forth the measures the operator has

taken or proposes for the reduction of

existing noncompatible uses and for the

prevention of the introduction of

additional noncompatible uses.

The City of Naples, Florida, submitted

to the FAA on February 13, 1997,

revised noise exposure maps,

descriptions and other documentation

which were produced during the Naples

Municipal Airport FAR Part 150

Revised program conducted between

March 23, 1995 and February 13, 1997.

It was requested that the FAA review

this material as the noise exposure

maps, as described in Section 103(a)(1)

of the Act, and that the noise mitigation

measures, to be implemented jointly by

the airport and surrounding

communities, be approved as a noise

compatibility program under section

104(b) of the Act.

The FAA has completed its review of

the revised noise exposure maps and

related descriptions submitted by the

City of Naples, Florida. The specific

maps under consideration are ‘‘1996

Existing Conditions Noise Exposure

Map’’ and ‘‘2001 Forecast Conditions

Revised Noise Exposure Map’’ in the

Revised Noise Compatibility Program

1996 submission. The FAA has

determined that these maps for Naples

Municipal Airport are in compliance

with applicable requirements. This

determination is effective on April 2,

1997. FAA’s determination on an airport

operator’s noise exposure maps is

limited to a finding that the maps were

developed in accordance with the

procedures contained in Appendix A of

FAR Part 150. Such determination does

not constitute approval of the

applicant’s data, information or plans,

or a commitment to approve a noise

compatibility program or to fund the

implementation of that program.

If questions arise concerning the

precise relationship of specific

properties to noise exposure contours

depicted on a noise exposure map

submitted under Section 103 of the Act,

it should be noted that the FAA is not

involved in any way in determining the

relative locations of specific properties

with regard to the depicted noise

contours, or in interpreting the noise

exposure maps to resolve questions

concerning, for example, which

properties should be covered by the

provisions of Section 107 of the Act.

These functions are inseparable from

the ultimate land use control and

planning responsibilities of local

government. These local responsibilities

are not changed in any way under Part

150 or through FAA’s review of noise

exposure maps. Therefore, the

responsibility for the detailed

overlaying of noise exposure contours