Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 49 / Thursday, March 13, 1997 / Notices 11855

regulations. All such protest must be

filed in accordance with Section

154.210 of the Commission’s

Regulations. Protests will be considered

by the Commission in determining

appropriate action to be taken, but will

not serve to make protestants parties to

the proceedings. Copies of this filing are

on file with the Commission and are

available for public inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97–6282 Filed 3–12–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. CP97–274–000]

NorAm Gas Transmission Company;

Notice of Request Under Blanket

Authorization

March 7, 1997.

Take notice that on March 3, 1997,

NorAm Gas Transmission Company

(NorAm), 525 Milam Street, Shreveport,

Louisiana 71151, filed in Docket No.

CP97–274–000 a request pursuant to

Sections 157.205 and 157.212 of the

Commission’s Regulations (18 CFR

157.205, 157.212) under the Natural Gas

Act (NGA) for authorization to construct

and operate a delivery tap to Quincy

Soybean Corporation (Quincy) located

in Phillips County, Arkansas under the

authorization of Section 7 of the Natural

Gas Act (NGA), for Part 284

transportation services by NorAm,

under NorAm’s blanket certificate

issued in Docket Nos. CP82–384–000

and CP82–384–001, all as more fully set

forth in the request that is on file with

the Commission and open to public

inspection.

NorAm proposes to install a two-inch

L-shaped meter station, a four-inch tap,

relief valve, electronic flow

measurement and 425 feet of 85⁄8

nominal piping that will extend from

NorAm’s Line TM–2 through the

Quincy yard to the cogeneration plant in

Phillips County, Arkansas. NorAm

indicates that the cost of these facilities

is $36,274. NorAm asserts that Quincy

has contracted for an additional 1,000

MMBtu per day with estimated

deliveries of 365,000 MMBtu on an

annual basis.

NorAm states that it will transport gas

to Quincy and provide service under

Rate Schedule FT of NorAm’s FERC Gas

Tariff. NorAm further states that its

tariff does not prohibit the addition of

delivery points and that NorAm has

sufficient capacity to accomplish the

deliveries without detriment or

disadvantage to its other customers.

Any person or the Commission’s staff

may, within 45 days after issuance of

the instant notice by the Commission,

file pursuant to Rule 214 of the

Commission’s Procedural Rules (18 CFR

385.214) a motion to intervene or notice

of intervention and pursuant to Section

157.205 of the Regulations under the

natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a

protest to the request. If no protest is

filed within the time allowed therefor,

the proposed activity shall be deemed to

be authorized effective the day after the

time allowed for filing a protest. If a

protest is filed and not withdrawn

within 30 days after the time allowed

for filing a protest, the instant request

shall be treated as an application for

authorization pursuant to section 7 of

the Natural Gas Act.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97–6281 Filed 3–12–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. RP97–277–000]

Richfield Gas Storage System; Notice

of Petition for Waiver or Exemption of

Certain Order Nos. 587 and 587–B

Requirements and Request for

Expedited Consideration

March 7, 1997.

Take notice that on March 3, 1997,

Richfield Gas Storage System

(Richfield), filed a petition pursuant to

Rule 207 of the Commission’s Rules of

Practice and Procedure for Waiver or

exemption of the requirements

concerning compliance with the

Internet server model and the capability

to perform Electronic Data Interchange

(EDI) transactions in Order Nos. 587 and

587–B, all as more fully set forth in the

petition of file with the Commission and

open to public inspection.

Richfield states that compliance with

the Internet server model and the ability

to perform EDI transactions is not

necessary on the Richfield system in

order to achieve the Commission’s

goals. Richfield states that the

incremental expense of compliance with

the Internet server model and the ability

to perform EDI transactions is

significant to Richfield, and the benefits

to Richfield’s customers are nonexistent

given the nature of the Richfield system.

Richfield requests that the commission

waive compliance with the Internet

server model and the ability to perform

EDI transactions while consideration of

its petition is pending. Richfield

requests expedited consideration.

Any person desiring to be heard or to

protest this petition should file a motion

to intervene or protest with the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission, 888

First Street, N.E., Washington, DC

20426, in accordance with sections

385.214 and 385.211 of the

Commission’s Rules and Regulations.

All such motions or protests should be

filed on or before March 14, 1997.

Protests will be considered by the

Commission in determining the

appropriate action to be taken, but will

not serve to make protestants parties to

the proceeding. Copies of this filing are

on file with the Commission and are

available for public inspection in the

Public Reference Room.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97–6284 Filed 3–12–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. CP97–273–000]

Trunkline Gas Company; Notice of

Request Under Blanket Authorization

March 7, 1997.

Take notice that on February 28, 1997,

Trunkline Gas Company (Trunkline),

P.O. Box 1642, Houston, Texas 77251–

1642, filed in the above docket, a

request pursuant to Section 7 of the

Natural Gas Act (NGA), as amended,

and Sections 157.205 and 157.212(a) of

the Commission’s Regulations, to

operate an existing delivery point and

appurtenant facilities in McCracken

County, Kentucky, as jurisdictional

facilities. Such facilities were originally

constructed pursuant to Section 311 of

the Natural Gas Policy Act (NGPA) in

order to effect transportation to Western

Kentucky Gas Company (Western

Kentucky), all as more fully set forth in

the request which is filed with the

Commission and open to public

inspection.

Specificlaly, Trunkline proposes to

convert the authorization of the subject

facilities from NGPA Section 311 to

NGA Section 7 in order to use the

delivery point for transportation

services rendered under Trunkline’s

blanket certificate. The maximum

capacity of the facilities at the delivery

point to Western Kentucky is 20 MMcf

per day of natural gas.

Any person or the Commission’s staff

may, within 45 days after issuance of

the instant notice by the Commission,

file pursuant to Rule 214 of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to

intervene or notice of intervention and

pursuant to Section 157.205 of the

Regulations under the Natural Gas Act

(18 CFR 157.205) a protest to the

request. If no protest is filed within the

time allowed therefor, the proposed

activity is deemed to be authorized

effective on the day after the time
11856 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 49 / Thursday, March 13, 1997 / Notices

allowed for filing a protest. If a protest

is filed and not withdrawn within 30

days after the time allowed for filing a

protest, the instant request shall be

treated as an application for

authorization pursuant to Section 7 of

the Natural Gas Act.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97–6280 Filed 3–12–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. RP97–254–001]

Williams Natural Gas Company; Notice

of Filing of Penalty Revenue Report

March 7, 1997.

Take notice that on March 4, 1997,

Williams Natural Gas Company (WNG)

tendered for filing a revised schedule to

its report of penalty revenue collected

during Periods of Daily Balancing

(PODB), filed February 18, 1997, in

Docket No. RP97–254–000.

WNG states that it made a filing on

February 18, 1997 to report the amount

of penalty revenue collected pursuant to

the provisions of Article 9.5 of the

General Terms and Conditions of its

FERC Gas Tariff during Periods of Daily

Balancing (PODB) occurring in January

and February, 1996, and the proposed

distribution of such revenue. WNG

inadavetently omitted Western

Resources, Inc. from the Delivery

Operator Refund report. A revised

Delivery Operator Refund report was

filed.

WNG states that a copy of its filing

was served on all participants listed on

the service list maintained by the

Commission in the docket referenced

above and on all of WNG’s jurisdictional

customers and interested state

commissions.

Any person desiring to protest this

filing should file a protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C.

20426, in accordance with Section

385.211 of the Commission’s Rules and

Regulations. All such protests must be

filed on or before March 14, 1997.

Protests will be considered by the

Commission in determining the

appropriate action to be taken, but will

not serve to make protestants parties to

the proceedings. Copies of this filing are

on file with the Commission and are

available for public inspection in the

Public Reference Room.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97–6283 Filed 3–12–97; 8:45 am]

BILIING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. EG97–35–000, et al.]

Aguaytia Energy del Peru S.R. Ltda., et

al.; Electric Rate and Corporate

Regulation Filings

March 6, 1997.

Take notice that the following filings

have been made with the Commission:

1. Aguaytia Energy del Peru S.R. Ltda.

[Docket No. EG–97–35–000]

On February 27, 1997, Aguaytia

Energy del Peru S.R. Ltda. (the

‘‘Applicant’’) whose address is Av.

Camino Real No. 111, Office 904, Ninth

Floor, San Isidro, Lima 27, Peru, filed

with the Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission an application for

determination of exempt wholesale

generator status pursuant to Part 365 of

the Commission’s Regulations.

The Applicant states that it will be

engaged directly and exclusively in the

business of owning an approximately

155–MW (net) gas-fired electric

generating facility to be constructed

near the city of Aguaytia, Peru, and

selling electric energy at wholesale, as

that term has been interpreted by the

Commission. The Applicant requests a

determination that the Applicant is an

exempt wholesale generator under

Section 32(a)(1) of the Public Utility

Holding Company Act of 1935.

Comment date: March 25, 1997, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice. The

Commission will limit its consideration

to those that concern the adequacy or

accuracy of the application.

2. South Suburban Citizens Opposed to

Polluting Our Environment v. Chewton

Glen Energy, Inc.

[Docket Nos. EL97–27–000 and QF92–101–

000]

Take notice that on February 5, 1997,

South Suburban Citizens Opposed to

Polluting Our Environment (SS-Cope)

tendered for filing a Petition for

Declaratory Order and request for

waiver of filing fee. SS-Cope requests

that the Commission review the

ownership and control structure of the

Chewton Glen Energy Ford Heights LLC

to determine whether the qualifying

facility continues to comply with

section 292.206 of the Commission’s

Regulations.

Comment date: March 21, 1997, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

3. Florida Power Corporation

[Docket No. ER96–2757–000]

Take notice that on February 4, 1997,

Florida Power Corporation tendered for

filing supplemental information to its

August 19, 1996, filing in the abovereferenced docket.

Comment date: March 20, 1997, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

4. Cinergy Services, Inc.

[Docket No. ER97–121–000]

Take notice that on February 24, 1997,

Cinergy Services, Inc. tendered for filing

an amendment in the above-referenced

docket.

Comment date: March 20, 1997, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

5. Public Service Electric and Gas

Company

[Docket No. ER97–837–001]

Take Notice that on February 27,

1997, Public Service Electric and Gas

Company (PSE&G) tendered for filing as

part of its FERC electric tariff, Original

Volume No. 6, Original Sheets No. 1 and

No. 2 to become effective February 16,

1997.

PSE&G asserts that the purpose of this

filing is to comply with the

Commission’s ‘‘Order Conditionally

Accepting For Filing Proposed MarketBased Rates’’ issued on February 12,

1997 in Docket No. ER97–837–000.

Specifically, PSE&G states that its filing

addresses purchases of power from

affiliates, provides for the separate

statement of prices for wholesale

generation, transmission and ancillary

services and addresses the

circumstances under which

transmission and ancillary services will

be provided under PSE&G’s open-access

transmission tariff.

PSE&G states that copies of the filing

were served on all affected customers,

interested state commissions and all

parties on the service list.

Comment date: March 19, 1997, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

6. MidAmerican Energy Company

[Docket No. ER97–1251–000]

Take notice that on February 27, 1997,

MidAmerican Energy Company

(MidAmerican), 106 East Second Street,

Davenport, Iowa 52801 tendered for

filing an amendment to its initial filing

in this docket. The proposed change

consists of the following:

1. Substitute Fourth Revised Sheet

No. 16, superseding Fourth Revised

Sheet No. 16;

2. Substitute Second Revised Sheet

Nos. 17 and 18, superseding Second

Revised Sheet Nos. 17 and 18;

3. Substitute First Revised Sheet Nos.

19 and 20, superseding First Revised

Sheet Nos. 19 and 20; and