alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 60 (Friday, March 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 14942]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-7895]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[ES-960-1910-00-4041] ES-48650, Group 99, Arkansas


Notice of Filing of Plat of Survey; Arkansas

    The plat of the dependent resurvey of the north boundary, a portion 
of the east boundary, a portion of the subdivisional lines, and the 
subdivision of certain sections of Township 15 North, Range 19 West, 
Fifth Principal Meridian Arkansas, will be officially filed in Eastern 
States, Springfield, Virginia at 7:30 a.m., on April 28, 1997.
    The survey was requested by the National Park Service.
    All inquiries or protests concerning the technical aspects of the 
survey must be sent to the Chief Cadastral Surveyor, Eastern States, 
Bureau of Land Management, 7450 Boston Boulevard, Springfield, Virginia 
22153, prior to 7:30 a.m., April 28, 1997.
    Copies of the plat will be made available upon request and 
prepayment of the reproduction fee of $2.75 per copy.

    Date: March 14, 1997.
Stephen G. Kopach,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor.
[FR Doc. 97-7895 Filed 3-27-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-65-M
No. 12-5550.

#### Threatt *v.*Arredia et al.

C. A. 6th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See *Martin*v. *District of Columbia Court of Appeals,*506 U. S. 1 (1992) *(per curiam).*
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 65 (Friday, April 4, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 16112]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-8566]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
50 CFR Part 679

[Docket No. 961126334-7025-02; I.D. 032897B]


Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska, Pollock in 
the Eastern Regulatory Area of the Gulf of Alaska

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Prohibition of retention.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NMFS is prohibiting retention of pollock in the Eastern 
Regulatory Area in the Gulf of Alaska (GOA). NMFS is requiring that 
catches of pollock in this area be treated in the same manner as 
prohibited species and discarded at sea with a minimum of injury. This 
action is necessary because the pollock 1997 total allowable catch 
(TAC) in this area has been reached.

EFFECTIVE DATE: Effective 1200 hrs, Alaska local time (A.l.t.), March 
31, 1997, until 2400 hrs, A.l.t., December 31, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas Pearson, 907-486-6919.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The groundfish fishery in the GOA exclusive 
economic zone is managed by NMFS according to the Fishery Management 
Plan for Groundfish of the Gulf of Alaska (FMP) prepared by the North 
Pacific Fishery Management Council under authority of the Magnuson-
Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act. Fishing by U.S. 
vessels is governed by regulations implementing the FMP at subpart H of 
50 CFR part 600 and 50 CFR part 679.
    The 1997 TAC of pollock in the Eastern Regulatory Area of the GOA 
was established by the Final 1997 Harvest Specifications of Groundfish 
for the GOA (62 FR 8179, February 24, 1997) as 5,580 metric tons (mt), 
determined in accordance with Sec. 679.20 (c)(3)(ii).
    In accordance with Sec. 679.20 (d)(2), the Administrator, Alaska 
Region, NMFS (Regional Administrator), has determined that the 1997 TAC 
for pollock in the Eastern Regulatory Area has been reached. Therefore, 
the Regional Administrator is requiring that further catches of pollock 
in the Eastern Regulatory Area be treated as prohibited species in 
accordance with Sec. 679.21 (b).

Classification

    This action is required by 50 CFR 679.20 and is exempt from review 
under E.O. 12866.

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: March 31, 1997.
Gary C. Matlock,
Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries 
Service.
[FR Doc. 97-8566 Filed 3-31-97; 4:29 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
<PAGE>   1




                                   EXHIBIT 11

                    THE WESTWOOD GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

                   FOR THE THREE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1994


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                     1996                    1995                  1994
                                                     ----                    ----                  ----

<S>                                              <C>                    <C>                   <C>  
NET (INCOME) LOSS BEFORE
  EXTRAORDINARY ITEM                             $  511,806             $(2,054,434)          $ ( 932,473)

EXTRAORDINARY ITEM                                        -                       -            11,159,640
                                                 ----------             -----------           -----------

NET INCOME (LOSS)                                $  511,806             $(2,054,434)          $12,092,113
                                                 ==========             ===========           ===========

WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON
  SHARES OUTSTANDING
  DURING THE PERIOD                               1,255,225               1,255,225             1,255,225
                                                 ==========             ===========           ===========

LOSS PER SHARE
  BEFORE EXTRAORDINARY
  ITEM                                                 $.41             $     (1.64)                 $.74

EXTRAORDINARY ITEM                                        -             $         -                  8.89
                                                    -------             -----------           -----------


INCOME (LOSS) PER
  SHARE AFTER
  EXTRAORDINARY ITEM                             $      .41              $     (1.64)         $      9.63
                                                 ==========              ===========          ===========
</TABLE>




                                       69
#### *In re*A.P.

109,341

10/30/13

Denied

Unpublished
**EXHIBIT 18**

March28, 2003

Rockof Ages772Graniteville RoadBarre,VT 05641

Ladiesand Gentlemen:

Wehave audited the consolidated balance sheets of Rock of Ages (the"Company") as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the relatedconsolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and comprehensiveincome and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period endedDecember 31, 2002, and have reported thereon under date of February 21, 2003. The aforementioned consolidated financialstatements and our audit report thereon are included in the Company's annualreport on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002. As stated in Note 2 to those financialstatements, the Company changed its method of accounting for its quarryinginventory from the first-in, first-out method to the specific annual averagecostmethod and states that the newly adopted accounting principle is preferable inthe circumstances because it more accurately measures the cost of the Company'squarrying inventory and more accurately matches manufacturing costs withrevenues resulting in an enhanced measurement of operating results. Inaccordance with your request, we have reviewed and discussed with Companyofficials the circumstances and business judgment and planning upon which the decisionto make this change in the method of accounting was based.

Withregard to the aforementioned accounting change, authoritative criteria have notbeen established for evaluating the preferability of one acceptable method ofaccounting over another acceptable method. However, for purposes of theCompany's compliance with the requirements of the Securities and ExchangeCommission, we are furnishing this letter.

Basedon our review and discussion, with reliance on management's business judgmentand planning, we concur that the newly adopted method of accounting ispreferable in the Company's circumstances.

 

Verytruly yours,

/s/KPMG LLPKPMGLLP
# C_2018388EN.01000501.xml

| 26.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 388/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 388/5

---

Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EU) 2015/1755 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Burundi apply

(2018/C 388/06)

The attention of data subjects is drawn to the following information in accordance with Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1):

The legal basis for this processing operation is Council Regulation (EU) 2015/1755 (2) as implemented by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1605 (3).

The controller of this processing operation is the Council of the European Union represented by the Director-General of DG RELEX (Foreign Affairs, Enlargement, Civil Protection) of the General Secretariat of the Council and the department entrusted with the processing operation is the Unit 1C of DG RELEX that can be contacted at:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG RELEX 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG RELEX 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The purpose of the processing operation is the establishment and updating of the list of persons subject to restrictive measures in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2015/1755, as implemented by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1605.

The data subjects are the natural persons who fulfil the listing criteria as laid down in that Regulation.

The personal data collected includes data necessary for the correct identification of the person concerned, the Statement of Reasons and any other data related thereto.

The personal data collected may be shared as necessary with the European External Action Service and the Commission.

Without prejudice to restrictions provided for in Article 20(1)(a) and (d) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, requests for access, as well as requests for rectification or objection will be answered in accordance with Section 5 of Council Decision 2004/644/EC (4).

Personal data will be retained for 5 years from the moment the data subject has been removed from the list of persons subject to the asset freeze or the validity of the measure has expired, or for the duration of court proceedings in the event they had been started.

Data subjects may have recourse to the European Data Protection Supervisor in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.

---

(1)  OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1.

(2)  OJ L 257, 2.10.2015, p. 1.

(3)  OJ L 268, 26.10.2018, p. 18.

(4)  OJ L 296, 21.9.2004, p. 16.

---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 63 (Wednesday, April 2, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 15673]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-8315]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. CP97-56-001]


Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America; Notice of Compliance 
Filing

March 27, 1997.
    Take notice that on March 20, 1997, Natural Gas Pipeline Company of 
America (Natural), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Sixth Revised Volume No. 1 and Second Revised Volume No. 2, the 
following tariff sheets:

Sixth Revised Volume No. 1

Second Revised Sheet No. 4A

Second Revised Volume No. 2

Twenty-Eighth Revised Sheet No. 1A
First Revised Sheet No. 996

    Natural also requests a waiver of the Commission's regulations to 
permit the tariff sheets to become effective March 20, 1997, the date 
of Natural's filing.
    Natural states that the purpose of this filing is to cancel 
Natural's Rate Schedule X-84, a gas transportation agreement between 
Natural and Koch Gateway Pipeline Company (Koch Gateway), formerly 
United Gas Pipe Line Company, dated May 24, 1976. Natural further 
states that these tariff sheets are being submitted in compliance with 
the Commission order issued on December 23, 1996 in Docket No. CP97-56-
000.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to make any protest with 
reference to said filing should on or before April 7, 1997, file with 
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Washington D.C. 20426, a 
motion to intervene or a protest in accordance with the requirements of 
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 
385.211) and the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.10). 
All protests filed with the Commission will be considered by it in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken but will not serve to 
make the protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to 
become a party to a proceeding or to participate as a party in any 
hearing therein must file a motion to intervene in accordance with the 
Commission's Rules. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-8315 Filed 4-1-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
November 19 , 2015



### JUDGMENT


## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

INWOOD FOREST COMMUN ITY IMPROVEMENT ASSO CIATION

, Appellant

NO. 14

- 14

- 00825

- CV V.

ELIO ARCE, ROBERT BURCHFIELD, DOROTHY BURCHFIELD, JUAN ORTIZ, LUXCIOLA ORTIZ, ALMA JEAN DOOLING, DONNA EBELT, CYNTHIA FOSS, DAVID FOSS, KATHRYN KERR HIX, RENE LOERA, ADOLFO LONG, KELLY McCLOUD, CHARLOTTE McMILLAN, MARICELA MENDEZ, MARTIN MENDEZ, INEZ M. N ORMAN, AND OLGA SANCHEZ, Appellees

________________________________ This cause, an appeal from the purported oral grant of a ppellee s’ motions to dismiss under the Texas Citizens Participation Act (TC P A) , on September 15, 2014, was heard on the transcript of the record. T he motions were denied by operation of law on October 16, 2014

. Appellant has moved to dismiss the appeal in the event the motions to dismiss were denied by operation of law. Accordingly,

we grant appellant’s motion. T he appeal is DISMISSED

. We order appell ees , jointly and severally, to pay all costs incurred in this appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of
the Principal Accounting Officer and the Trustee of Marine Petroleum Trust (the
Company), does hereby certify, to such persons knowledge, that: The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004
(the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as
of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q. /s/ R. RAY BELLR. Ray BellPrincipal Accounting Officer
 Dated: May 14, 2004 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Marine Petroleum Trust and will be retained by Marine Petroleum
Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request. The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q
pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63
of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part
of the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the
company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any
general incorporation language in such filing.
S95A1328.

#### CORNELL v. THE STATE.

(463 SE2d 702)

Hunstein, Justice.

Frederick Cornell was found guilty of felony murder during the commission of an aggravated assault, armed robbery, and possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime. Cornell was sentenced to life imprisonment. He appeals from the denial of his motion for new trial.1

1. The evidence at trial established that appellant came to work at his employment as a night auditor at a motel in Augusta with a .22 caliber revolver. The gun discharged and his co-worker, Karin Williams, was shot between the eyes and killed. Appellant took money from the cash register and placed both the gun and the money into a garbage bag which he dumped behind the motel. He then telephoned *905the police and reported a robbery and murder at the motel. After being questioned three times and denying any involvement in the incident, appellant called the police and informed them he had accidentally shot Karin when he was showing her the gun. He asserted that he panicked and staged the armed robbery.

Decided November 20, 1995.

*Michael C. Garrett, Allison L. Byrd,*for appellant.

*Daniel J. Craig, District Attorney, Charles R. Sheppard, Assistant District Attorney, Michael J. Bowers, Attorney General, Susan V. Boleyn, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Marla-Deen Brooks, Assistant Attorney General,*for appellee.

The evidence presented at trial was sufficient to authorize a rational trier of fact to find appellant guilty of the crimes charged beyond a reasonable doubt under the standard set forth in *Jackson v. Virginia,*443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979).

2. In his remaining enumeration, appellant asserts the trial court erred in refusing to admit demonstrative evidence in the form of a computer reenactment. Whether the computer simulation “ ‘is a fair and accurate representation of the scene sought to be depicted addresses itself to the discretion of the trial judge which will not be controlled unless abused. . . .’ [Cit.]” *Jones v. State,*250 Ga. 498, 499 (3) (299 SE2d 549) (1983). Because the trial court correctly determined that an adequate foundation for admission of the simulation had not been established, there exists no ground for reversal.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

1

 The homicide occurred on February 6, 1992. Cornell was indicted on May 26, 1992 in Richmond County. He was found guilty on June 2, 1994 and was sentenced on July 6, 1994. His motion for new trial, filed July 20, 1994, was denied on March 24, 1995. A notice of appeal was filed on March 31, 1995. The appeal was docketed on May 15, 1995. Oral argument was heard on September 11, 1995.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 65 (Friday, April 4, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 16142]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-8609]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Defense Science Board Task Force Advanced Modeling and Simulation 
for Analyzing Combat Concepts in the 21st Century

ACTION: Notice of advisory committee meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board Task Force on Advanced Modeling and 
Simulation for Analyzing Combat Concepts in the 21st Century will meet 
in closed session on April 21-22, 1997 at USACOM, JTASC, 116 Lakeview 
Parkway, Suffolk, Virginia.
    The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary 
of Defense through the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and 
Technology on scientific and technical matters as they affect the 
perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At this meeting the Task 
Force will address modeling and simulation capabilities required for 
analyzing concepts for 21st century military combat operations. These 
capabilities should encompass the breadth of warfare from strategic to 
individuals fighting afoot for all phases of military operations (Air, 
Land, Sea, Information, Communications).
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, P.L. No. 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II, (1994)), it has 
been determined that this DSB Task Force meeting concerns matters 
listed in 5 U.S.C. Sec. 552b(c) (1) (1994), and that accordingly this 
meeting will be closed to the public.

    Dated: April 1, 1997.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 97-8609 Filed 4-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-4-M
No. 11-10587.

No. 11-10612.

#### Dominguez-Sianez *v.*United States; and Baldovinas *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 463 Fed. Appx. 326.
EXHIBIT 21



                       SUBSIDIARIES OF RECOTON CORPORATION

   COMPANY                                                  JURISDICTION

   Recoton Canada Ltd.                                      Ontario, Canada
   Recoton (Far East) Limited                               Hong Kong
   STD Holding Limited +                                    Hong Kong
   STD Electronic International Limited ++                  Hong Kong
   STD Manufacturing Limited ++                             Hong Kong
   STD Plastic Industrial Limited ++ #                      Hong Kong
   STD Trading Limited ++ #                                 Hong Kong
   Peak Hero Limited ++ #                                   Hong Kong
   Ever Smart Management Limited ++                         Hong Kong
   STD Industrial (Shenzhen) Limited ++                     P.R. of China
   STD (Tianjin) International Trade
      Development Company Limited ++#                       P.R of China
   Christie Design Corporation                              Delaware
   InterAct Accessories, Inc.                               Delaware
   AAMP of Florida, Inc., d/b/a AAMP of America, Inc.       Florida
   Recoton Audio Corporation, d/b/a
      Recoton Mobile Electronics                            Delaware
   ReCone, Inc. +++#                                        Delaware
   Recoton Home Audio, Inc.  +++                            California
   Recoton Japan, Inc.  +++                                 Illinois
   RAC-FSC +++#                                             U.S. Virgin Islands
   Recoton International Holdings, Inc.  +++                Delaware
   Recoton European Holdings, Inc.  +++                     Delaware
   Recoton German Holdings GmbH +++                         Germany
   Mac Audio Electronic GmbH +++                            Germany
   Magnat Audio-Produkte GmbH +++                           Germany
   HECO Audio-Produkte GmbH +++                             Germany
   Recoton Italia s.r.l.  +++                               Italy
   Arcona s.r.l.  +++                                       Italy
   Recoton (UK) Limited +++                                 United Kingdom
   Tambalan Limited, d/b/a Ross Consumer Products+++        United Kingdom
   Ross Consumer Products(HK)+++#                           Hong Kong

   +      Subsidiary of Recoton (Far East) Limited
   ++     Subsidiary of STD Holding Limited
   +++    Direct or indirect subsidiary of Recoton Audio Corporation
   #      Inactive