alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM REGISTRANTS
1996 ANNUAL REPORT TO SHAREHOLDERS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          34,466
<SECURITIES>                                    25,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,945
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      7,414
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                95,393
<PP&E>                                         541,544
<DEPRECIATION>                                 184,919
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 531,398
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           58,846
<BONDS>                                        100,501
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        59,837
<OTHER-SE>                                     151,348
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   531,396
<SALES>                                        202,265
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               217,282
<CGS>                                          180,302
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  180,302
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,718
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,032
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,230
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,969
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,261
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,261
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.27
        

</TABLE>
*Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular

cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes

needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal

profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the Court has determined

that this opinion should not be published.

 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 95-10092

Summary Calendar

CREDIT COUNSELING CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

 NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR CONSUMER CREDIT, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

 Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Northern District of Texas

(3:94 CV 01855)

( July 10, 1995 )

Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, WIENER and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

This is a civil action between two companies that provide

consumers with debt management services. Plaintiffcounterdefendant Credit Counseling Centers of America ("CCCA") sued
2

to obtain a declaratory judgment that defendant-counterplaintiff

National Foundation for Consumer Credit, Inc.'s ("NFCC's") licensed

name, CONSUMER CREDIT COUNSELING SERVICE, is a generic expression

and hence unprotectable. The Defendant-counterplaintiff NFCC

counter claimed on theories of federal trademark infringement,

federal unfair competition, false representation, and false

designation of origin and a Texas law claim for injury to business

reputation and trade name, and moved for a preliminary injunction

to require CCCA to modify pending advertising, prevent further

advertising, and refrain from using the term "Consumer Credit

Counseling" just prior to CCCA's name, "Credit Counseling Centers

of America." 

The court below issued a preliminary injunction after having

entered a memorandum opinion dated November 29, 1994. Said

memorandum opinion and preliminary injunction are attached herewith

as Appendix "A." 

On the basis of the memorandum opinion, we affirm the issuing

of the preliminary injunction in the above case. 

The plaintiff-appellants ask us to dissolve the preliminary

injunction issued by the trial court and remand the case for

further proceedings. 

They tell us that the term "Consumer Credit Counselling" is a

generic term and it is not protectable and they tell us that even

if this term is found to be protectable, appellee still has 

the right to use the term under the fair use defense under the

Lanham Trademark Act and that the appellant has not had the
3

opportunity to put forward this defense. The record does not show

that they offered this defense before the preliminary injunction

was issued. 

What we have before us is a preliminary injunction and is

interlocutory, of course, and does not prevent the trier of fact

from making other findings at a trial on the merits. 

The appellant must seek a hearing on the merits in which they

may be able to convince the trier of fact that in truth and in fact

what is being argued about is a generic term and not protectable,

and if it is protectable, that they have a right to use it under

the fair use defense of the Landham Act. 

The preliminary injunction as issued by the court below is

therefore AFFIRMED.
#### Galloway v. State

107,028

07/19/13

Denied.

Unpublished
# Table 3a_Real
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  **FAA -**  **2015 -**  **3659** ☐ These comments are in **Directorate ID: 2014**  **- SW** **- 050**  **- AD**  response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** ☒ FRAN ☐ SNPRM 

### ☒ N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is ch ecked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued?

If yes, list latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new n otice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. 

### Latest Revision
. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discus**  **sed together.** Do not list all of the issues from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA
- IR
- M
- 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : 

### Choose one . If other, explain : Commenter(s): 

### Click here to enter text. What change to the AD action is requested? 

### Click here to enter text. Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

### Click here to enter text. Do we agree? 

### Yes/No If **YES,** we agree because 

### Insert justification Make the following changes to the AD: 

### Li st any changes to the AD If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with 

### In sert text because 

### In sert justification We disagree with 

### Insert text because 

### In sert justification Make the following changes to the AD: 

### List any changes to the AD If **NO** , we don’t agree because 

### In sert our rationale
**ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following : 

### Choose one .

If other, explain : 

### Click here to enter text. Commenter(s): 

### Cl ick here to enter text. What change to the AD action is requested? 

### Click here to enter text. Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

### Click here to enter text. Do we agree? 

### Yes/No

### Page 2 of 3

If **YES,** we agree because 

### Insert justification Make the f ollowing changes to the AD: 

### Li st any changes to the AD If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with 

### In sert text because 

### In sert justification We disagree with 

### Insert text because 

### In sert justification Make the following changes to the AD: 

### List any changes to the A D If **NO** , we don’t agree because 

### In sert our rationale
**For additional issues, double -**  **click here** 

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.:

**ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch Manager Date**
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 59 (Thursday, March 27, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 14703]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-7748]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT


Notice of Acceptance of the American Schools and Hospitals Abroad 
(ASHA) Application for Assistance

SUMMARY: This applicant notice is for private U.S. organizations 
requesting grant assistance for overseas institutions under Section 214 
of the Foreign Assistance Act. ``Applicant'' refers to the United 
States founder or sponsor of the overseas institution.
    The Office of American Schools and Hospitals (ASHA) will accept 
applications for assistance in fiscal years 1997/1998, if received by 
ASHA on or before June 30, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Office of American Schools and 
Hospitals Abroad (ASHA), (703) 351-0232.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Title: American Schools and Hospitals Abroad.
    Form No.: A.I.D.1010-2.
    OMB No.: 0512-0011.
    Type of Submission: Acceptance of Application for Assistance.
    Abstract: The application was used by U.S. founders and sponsors in 
applying for grant assistance from ASHA on behalf of their institutions 
overseas. ASHA is a competitive grant program. Decisions are based on 
an annual comparative review of all applications requesting assistance 
in the fiscal year, pursuant to Section 214 of the Foreign Assistance 
Act, as amended.

ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN:

    Respondents: U.S. Not-for-profit organizations.
    Number of Respondents: 85.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden on Respondents: 12.

    Dated: March 18, 1997.
Mable S. Meares,
Acting Director, Office of American Schools and Hospitals Abroad, 
Bureau for Humanitarian Response.
[FR Doc. 97-7748 Filed 3-26-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6116-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 146 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 146

 Commending South Charleston, West Virginia, for celebrating its 50th 
                annual Armed Forces Day on May 16, 2009.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 12, 2009

Mr. Byrd submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Commending South Charleston, West Virginia, for celebrating its 50th 
                annual Armed Forces Day on May 16, 2009.

Whereas Americans appreciate the courage, loyalty, and sacrifice of every 
        individual who serves in the Armed Forces of the United States;
Whereas Armed Forces Day is celebrated on the third Saturday in May to honor 
        those Americans serving in the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force, and 
        Coast Guard;
Whereas Armed Forces Day was established on August 31, 1949, following the 
        consolidation of the military services of the United States into the 
        Department of Defense;
Whereas Armed Forces Day is celebrated with parades, open houses, receptions, 
        and air shows around the Nation; and
Whereas on May 16, 2009, South Charleston, West Virginia, will observe its 50th 
        annual Armed Forces Day with a parade, music, and other entertainment: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate commends South Charleston, West Virginia, 
for conducting Armed Forces Day celebrations for 50 consecutive years 
and for honoring the selfless dedication and bravery of the men and 
women of the United States Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force, and 
Coast Guard.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2018413EN.01000102.xml

| 14.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 413/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 413/1

---

BIO-BASED INDUSTRIES JOINT UNDERTAKING

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2017

(2018/C 413/02)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

https://www.bbi-europe.eu/sites/default/files/annual-accounts-bbiju-financial-year-2017.pdf

---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 58 (Wednesday, March 26, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14410-14411]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-7575]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-99-001]


Algonquin LNG, Inc., Notice of Request for Waiver

March 20, 1997.
    Take notice that on January 6, 1997, Algonquin LNG, Inc. (Algonquin 
LNG) filed a request for waiver of Section

[[Page 14411]]

154.107(b) of the Commission's regulations so that it may be allowed to 
use rates for Capacity Reservation and Authorized Overrun Charge stated 
in Dollars per Barrel per Day.
    Algonquin LNG states that the Per Barrel rate most accurately 
reflects the use of the storage facility. In addition, Algonquin LNG 
states that it is also the basis upon which the rates were designed and 
that its storage Per Barrel rates do not contravene the intent of Order 
No. 582.
    Algonquin LNG's waiver request is in response to the Commission's 
Letter Order of December 20, 1996, accepting certain tariff sheets 
filed November 26, 1996, in Docket No. RP97-99-000, to comply with the 
Commission's Order Nos. 581 and 582. The December 20 Letter Order also 
required Algonquin LNG to submit an explanation as to why it has not 
filed to reflect all rates on a thermal basis or to request a waiver of 
Section 154.107(b) of the Commission's regulations.
    Any person desiring to protest said failing should file a protest 
with Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedures. All such protests should 
be filed on or before March 27, 1997. Protests will be considered by 
the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but 
will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of 
this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for 
public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-7575 Filed 3-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
balance sheets and statements of operations found on pages 3 and 5 of the
Company's Form 10-QSB for the year to date, and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          45,523     
<SECURITIES>                                         0      
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                46,300
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (902)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  47,032
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,289
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                       398,409
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (354,666)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    43,743
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   908
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                48,574
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (47,666)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (47,666)  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

September 11, 1997

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of Rohr, Inc.

We have audited the consolidated financial statements of Rohr, Inc. and its 
subsidiaries as of July 31, 1997 and 1996, and for each of the three years in 
the period ended July 31, 1997, included in your Annual Report on Form 10-K as 
of July 31, 1997 to the Securities and Exchange Commission and have issued our 
report thereon dated September 11, 1997. Note 2 to such consolidated financial
statements contains a description of your adoption during the fourth quarter of
the year ended July 31, 1997 of a change in accounting principle from the
program method of accounting to the contract method of accounting. In our
judgement, such change is to an alternative accounting principle that is
preferable under the circumstances.


Yours truly,

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Exhibit 32.1

                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
                            SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of
Ronson Corporation (the "Company"), certifies that:

            (1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the year
ended December 31, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78 m or
78 o(d)); and

            (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: November 20, 2009             /s/ Louis V. Aronson II
                                     -----------------------
                                     Louis V. Aronson II
                                     President and Chief Executive Officer


Dated: November 20, 2009             /s/ Daryl K. Holcomb
                                     --------------------
                                     Daryl K. Holcomb
                                     Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

            This certification is made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for
any other purpose.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

TERRY E. ROBINSON,

Defendant Below,

Appellant,

v.

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL 

TRUST COMPANY, as trustee of 

the INDYMAC INDX MORTGAGE 

TRUST 2006-AR4, MORTGAGE 

PASS-THROUGH 

CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-

AR4, UNDER THE POOLING 

AND SERVICING AGREEMENT 

DATED MARCH 1, 2006

Plaintiff Below,

Appellee.

§

§ 

§ No. 390, 2019

§

§ Court Below—Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§ 

§ C.A. No. N13L-08-176

§ 

§ 

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Submitted: November 12, 2019

Decided: November 27, 2019

O R D E R

This 27th day of November 2019, it appears to the Court that:

(1) The appellant, Terry E. Robinson, filed this appeal from a Superior 

Court order granting a writ of possession to the appellee (“Deutsche Bank”) in a 

mortgage foreclosure action. On October 4, 2019, the Court received a letter from 

Deutsche Bank’s counsel suggesting that the appeal is moot because the Sheriff of 

New Castle County had reported that the subject property was vacant on September 

17, 2019, a lock out was completed on October 2, 2019, and Deutsche Bank now has 
2

possession of the property. On October 7, 2019, the Clerk issued a notice, by 

certified mail, directing Robinson to show cause why the appeal should not be 

dismissed as moot in light of Deutsche Bank’s October 4 letter. The notice to show 

cause directed Robinson to respond within ten days and advised him that if he did 

not respond, dismissal of the appeal would be deemed to be unopposed. The notice 

to show cause was addressed to the return address that had appeared on the most 

recent correspondence that the Court had received from Robinson, which differed 

from the address that Robinson had provided in his notice of appeal. On October 

21, 2019, the postal service returned it to the Clerk’s office, marked as undeliverable

and indicating that the property at that address was vacant.

(2) On October 22, 2019, the Clerk resent the notice to show cause, by 

certified mail, to the address that Robinson had provided in his notice of appeal, 

which corresponded to the address of the subject property. On November 12, 2019, 

the postal service returned the second notice to show cause to the Clerk’s office, 

marked as undeliverable and indicating that the property was vacant.

(3) Robinson having failed to respond to the notice to show cause within 

the required ten-day period or to report any change of address to the Court, dismissal 

of this action is deemed unopposed. 
3

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules 29(b) 

and 3(b)(2), that the appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ James T. Vaughn, Jr. 

Justice