alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 61 (Monday, March 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 15182]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-8099]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-1154-DR]


Idaho; Amendment to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of Idaho, (FEMA-1154-DR), dated January 4, 1997, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 20, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3260.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster for the State 
of Idaho, is hereby amended to include the following area among those 
areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe 
declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of 
January 4, 1997:

    Camas County for Hazard Mitigation and Public Assistance.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 83.516, Disaster 
Assistance.)
Lacy E. Suiter,
Executive Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 97-8099 Filed 3-28-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, ascreated by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the followingcertifications are being made to accompany the Registrant’s quarterly report onForm 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended January 28, 2006:**

 

**Certificationof Chief Executive Officer(1)**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of The Neiman Marcus Group,Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

(i) theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended January28, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended; and

 

(ii) theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: March 8, 2006 |       /s/    BURTON  M. TANSKY                                                |
|----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                 |       Burton M. Tansky        President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

**Certificationof Chief Financial Officer(1)**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of The Neiman Marcus Group,Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

(i) theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended January28, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended; and

 

(ii) theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: March 8, 2006 |       /s/    JAMES  E. SKINNER                                                             |
|----------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                 |       James E. Skinner        Senior Vice President and Chief Financial  Officer |

** **

** **

----

(1) A signed original for this written statement required by Section906 has been provided to The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. and will be retained byThe Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
================================================================================

Exhibit 32.1

          CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
                     OFFICER OF SPARTA SURGICAL CORPORATION
             FORM 10-QSB/A FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED AUGUST 31, 2007
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES -OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I am the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Sparta Surgical
Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company". I am delivering this
certificate in connection with the Form 10-QSB/A of the Company for the six
months ended August 31, 2007 and filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission ("Form 10-QSB/A").

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
the Form 10-QSB/A fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Form 10-QSB/A fairly presents, in all material
respect, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: January 9, 2008                         /s/ Allan J. Korn
                                              -----------------
                                              Allan J. Korn
                                              Chief Executive Officer and
                                              Chief Financial Officer












--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. 12-1.

#### Republic of Argentina *v.*EM Ltd. et al.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Multi-Color Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Francis D. Gerace, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: August 13, 2003



By:

/s/    FRANCIS D. GERACEFrancis D. GeracePresident and Chief Executive Officer
#### *In re A.L.H.*

113,589

03/31/2016

Denied.

Unpublished
#### State v. Reed

111,663

03/28/2016

Denied.

Unpublished
#### State v. Maberry

110,088

04/21/2016

Denied.

Unpublished
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           5,114
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,259
<ALLOWANCES>                                       380
<INVENTORY>                                        712
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,860
<PP&E>                                           2,341
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,363
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,980
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,838
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,140
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,980
<SALES>                                          6,639
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,639
<CGS>                                            3,557
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,557
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,743
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    339
<INCOME-TAX>                                       119
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                220
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       220
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Daniel Grey., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of SBE, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial
reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the
registrant and have:

      a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;

      b) [intentionally omitted];

      c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

      d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

<PAGE>

      b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: January 20, 2006


/s/ Daniel Grey
-----------------------
Daniel Grey
Chief Executive Officer and President
No. 12-5287.

#### Nichols *v.*Tennessee.

Ct. Crim. App. Tenn. Certiorari denied.
1 ... S eeTe x. R. App . P. 47. 4. 

## COURT OFAPPEALS SECOND DISTRICTOF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2 - 08 - 41 4- CV CA R LGAV R E L AP P E L L ANT V . M A RK LI EBERM A N , KA TH LEE N LI EBERM A N , A PPELL EES G E O R G E O N Z O , L A U R E N Y O U N G , JOHN DO E, AN D SPAN I SH G ARD ENS CON DOMI NI UM ASS OCI AT I ON

----- -----

FR O M THE 1 41 DI STRI CT CO URT O F TARRA NT CO UN TY st

----- ----- 

### ME MORANDUM OPI NI ON 1 

### AND J UDGME NT

----- ----- W e have consi der ed t he “Joi ntM ot i on T o D i sm i ss A ppeal A s To A ppel l ee Spani sh G ar den s C ondom i ni um A ss oci at i on. ” I ti s t he cou rt ’ s opi ni on t hatt he m o ti o n s h o u l d b e g ra n te d ; th e re fo re , w e d i s m i s s th e a p p e a l o f a p p e l l a n tC a rl G a v re l a s to a p p e l l e e S p a n i s h G a rd e n s C o n d o m i n i u m A s s o c i a ti o n . S eeTe x. R. A pp. P. 42. 1( a) ( 2) , 43. 2( f ) . Thi s ca se sh al l he r ea f t erbe s t yl ed “Car l G avr el v. M ar k L i ebe r m an, Kat hl ee n L i ebe r m an , G eor ge O nz o, La ur en Young, an d Jo hn D o e .”2

A s bet w een G avr el and S pani sh G ar dens C ond om i ni um A ssoci at i on, each part y shal l beart hei row n cost s oft hi s appeal , f orw hi ch l etexecut i on i ssue.

P E R CU R I AM
PA N EL: W A LKER, M C C O Y, an d M EI ER, JJ. DEL I VERE D: M a y 7, 2009
# weekprod1986
# Data for Table B23

# RSEs for Table B23
#### VINCENT J. DOWLING, JR. *v.*WILLIAM F. SHEA ET AL.

(AC 34837)

Lavine, Beach and Borden, Js.

Argued April 24

officially released May 14, 2013

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed.
No. 11-10671.

#### Garcia *v.*Evans, Warden, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
```

[Federal Register: November 2, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 211)]
[Notices]               
[Page 67348]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr02no10-35]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

 
Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

Time and Date: Wednesday, November 3, 2010; 11 a.m.-12 Noon.

Place: Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, 
Bethesda, Maryland.

Status: Closed to the Public.

Matter To Be Considered

Compliance Status Report

    The Commission staff will brief the Commission on the status of 
compliance matters.
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-7948.

Contact Person for More Information: Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

    Dated: October 27, 2010.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-27748 Filed 10-29-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
```
#### Humphrey v. Roberts

113,024

08/30/2016

Denied.

Unpublished
----

----

|   | 1. | The Report      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Registrant. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  January      14, 2009 | By:        /s/ John G. Simmonds                            |
|----------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                   | Name:  John      G. Simmonds                               |
|                                   | Title:     Principal      Executive Officer |
|                                   | President, CEO and    Director                                       |
No. 107,697

#### In the Matter of David G. Shriver, *Respondent*

(294 P.3d 251)

Dated this 18th day of January, 2013.

On June 22, 2012, this court suspended the respondent, David G. Shriver, from the practice of law in Kansas for a period of 6 months. See *In re David G. Shriver,*294 Kan. 617, 278 P.3d 964 (2012). Before reinstatement, the respondent was required to pay die costs of the disciplinary action and comply with Supreme Court Rule 218 (2012 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 397) and Supreme Court Rule 219 (2012 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 398).

On January 8, 2013, David G. Shriver filed a petition with this court for reinstatement to the practice of law in Kansas. The petition was referred to the Disciplinary Administrator for consideration by the Kansas Board for Discipline of Attorneys, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 219. The Disciplinary Administrator affirmed that the respondent met all requirements set forth by the court.

The court, after carefully considering the record, grants the respondent’s petition for reinstatement.

It Is Therefore Ordered that the respondent be reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Kansas conditioned upon his compliance with the annual continuing legal education requirements and upon his payment of all fees required by the Clerk of the Appellate Courts and the Kansas Continuing Legal Education Commission. When the respondent has complied with the annual continuing legal education requirements and has paid the fees required by the Clerk of the Appellate Courts and the Kansas Continuing Legal Education Commission, the Clerk is directed to enter respondent’s name upon the roster of attorneys engaged in the practice of law in Kansas.

It Is Further Ordered that this order of reinstatement of David G. Shriver shall be published in the Kansas Reports, and the *costs*of the reinstatement proceedings are assessed to the respondent.
# Gordon Pierce, Colorado Department of Public Health

and Environment

February 24, 2016

Impact of background ozone on Colorado and need for

better tools

(2 pages)BackgroundOzoneLeavesWesternStatesLittleMargintoAttainNAAQS•ColoradocutVOCsandNOx inexistingNAA~25‐30%–2017modelshowsonly3‐6%dropinozone•EPAmodelingtodateshows~40‐50ppbofozoneinColoradoisbackground•ModeledNAAwithzeroColoradoanthropogenicemissionsofprecursors–2017DVfellonly~25%,to54‐60ppb(from~76ppb)•ColoradoNAAhas4‐5ppbimpactfrom5upwindstates–Butforthis,ColoradoNAAwouldattain75ppb1PresentationtoEPA’sBackgroundOzoneWorkshopFeb.24‐25,2016,BetterToolsNeededforBackground•Exceptionalevents‐chronicbackgroundlevelsdon’tapply–Currenttoolsarelimitedinuse•Notjustaruralproblem–Backgroundis90%ofDVinColoradoSprings;cityisonly2‐4ppbbelow2015NAAQS–Backgroundis28‐49%ofDVinDenver/NFRNAA•Coloradoisfarfromborder,butexperiencesinternationaltransport•Aftermakingaggressiveemissionreductions,Westernstatesneedmoreeffectivetoolsandresourcestoaddressbackground2PresentationtoEPA’sBackgroundOzoneWorkshopFeb.24‐25,2016,
# C_2022472EN.01004601.xml

| 12.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 472/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 472/46

---

Action brought on 25 October 2022 — M&T 1997 v EUIPO — VDS Czmyr Kowalik (Door and window handles)

(Case T-654/22)

(2022/C 472/53)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: M&T 1997, a.s. (Dobruška, Czech Republic) (represented by: T. Dobřichovský, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: VDS Czmyr Kowalik sp.k. (Świętochłowice, Poland)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the design at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Design at issue: European Union design No 2 138 008-0031

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 August 2022 in Case R 29/2022-3

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | modify the contested decision so that the appeal brought by the applicant is upheld, the application for invalidity is dismissed and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal is ordered to pay the costs incurred by the applicant in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal and the Invalidity Division; |
| --- | --- |

—

modify the contested decision so that the appeal brought by the applicant is upheld, the application for invalidity is dismissed and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal is ordered to pay the costs incurred by the applicant in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal and the Invalidity Division;

| — | order the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs incurred by the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs incurred by the applicant.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 25(1)b of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002, read in conjunction with Article 6 thereof; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 25(1)b of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002, read in conjunction with Article 6 thereof;

| — | Infringement of Article 64(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002, read in conjunction with Article 65(1) thereof. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 64(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002, read in conjunction with Article 65(1) thereof.

---
#### McElhaney v. Thomas

111,590

06/21/2016

Granted.

Unpubhshed
No. 12-5377.

#### Poydras *v.*Louisiana.

Sup. Ct. La. Certio-rari denied.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7418

TRAVIS WAYNE ENTSMINGER, Petitioner - Appellant, versus VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-04-750-7) Submitted: January 26, 2006 Decided: February 2, 2006 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Travis Wayne Entsminger, Appellant Pro Se. Joel Christopher Hoppe, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Travis Wayne Entsminger seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting Respondent’s motion for summary judgment and denying relief on Entsminger’s petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Entsminger has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED