alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 57 (Tuesday, March 25, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 14134]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-7420]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. CP97-290-000]


Sabine Pipe Line Company; Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

March 19, 1997.
    Take notice that on March 14, 1997, Sabine Pipe Line Company 
(Sabine), P.O. Box 4781, Houston, Texas 77210-4781 filed in Docket No. 
CP97-290-000 a request pursuant to Sections 157.205, and 157.211 of the 
Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205 and 
157.211) for approval and permission to use an existing receipt tap to 
deliver natural gas to Tejas Gas Pipeline Company (Tejas) located in 
Jefferson County, Texas, under the blanket certificate issued in Docket 
No. CP83-199-000, pursuant to Section 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act 
(NGA), all as more fully set forth in request which is on file with the 
Commission and open to public inspection.
    Sabine states that it proposes to operate the interconnection as 
both a receipt tap to receive natural gas supplies for Sabine's 
shippers and as a sales tap to deliver natural gas to Tejas or its 
shippers. Sabine asserts that the maximum quantity of natural gas that 
will be delivered through the interconnection is 100,000 MMcf per day, 
subject to prevailing operating conditions. Sabine also asserts that 
the delivery point will be available to all existing and potential 
shippers receiving service under Sabine's FT-1 and IT-1 Rate Schedule 
Schedules set forth in Sabine's FERC Gas Tariff.
    Any person or the Commission's Staff may, within 45 days after the 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and procedure (18 CFR 
385.214), a motion to intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant 
to Section 157.205 of the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 
157.205), a protest to the request. If no protest is filed within the 
time allowed therefor, the proposed activities shall be deemed to be 
authorized effective the day after the time allowed for filing a 
protest. If a protest is filed and notwithdrawn 30 days after the time 
allowed for filing a protest, the instant request shall be treated as 
an application for authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural 
Gas Act.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-7420 Filed 3-24-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. D-2697.

#### In re Discipline of Prem.

Wayne Thomas Prem, of Towson, Md., is suspended from the practice of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
Exhibit 10.25


 


 


 


March 27, 2020


 


Kevin Clarke


####


####


####


 


Dear Kevin,


 


Reference is made to the Amended and Restated Employment
Agreement (the “Agreement”), is entered into as of August 9, 2019 (the “Effective Date”), by and
between Kevin Clarke (the “Executive”) and Authentic Brands Group LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“ABG”
and, together with any of members of the ABG Group as may employ the Executive from time to time, and any successor(s) thereto, the “Company”).
Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Agreement.


 


The purpose of this letter is to set forth the terms and
conditions of the agreement between the Executive and the Company to temporarily modify and amend certain terms and conditions of the
Agreement.


 


For valuable consideration, the value
and sufficiency of which is hereby agreed and acknowledged, notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the Agreement, Executive
and the Company agree as follows:


 


		(a)	Executive’s Annual Base Salary and Annual Bonus opportunity for the calendar
year ending December 31, 2020, shall be the same as calendar year ending December 31, 2019.



 


		(b)	50% of Executive’s Annual Base Salary shall be deferred (the “Deferred
Amount”) for a period of 9 months from April 1, 2020 (such period of time the “Deferral Period”).



 


		(c)	Upon the termination of the Deferral Period Executive’s Annual Base Salary shall be returned to
its normal level taking into consideration any increase in Annual Base Salary Executive would have received for calendar year 2020.



 


		(d)	Upon the termination of the Deferral Period, at the sole discretion of the Company’s
Board of Directors, the Company may pay to Executive all, some or none of the Deferred Amount.



 


		(e)	The reduction of Executive’s Annual Base Salary, solely during the Deferral
Period, shall not be deemed “Good Reason” under the Agreement.



 


Notwithstanding the foregoing, and for greater certainty,
the Severance Amount in the Agreement shall be calculated without reference to the Deferral Amount and based upon the Annual Base Salary
before such reduction.


 


Other than as set forth in this Letter Agreement all other
terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.


 


1411
BROADWAY, 4TH FL, NEW YORK, NY 10018 | 212.760.2410


 






     


     


    

 


This Letter Agreement shall be governed
by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware. This Letter Agreement may be executed in several counterparts,
each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which together will constitute one and the same Agreement.


 


Sincerely, 


Authentic Brands Group LLC


 


	By: 	/s/ Jay Dubiner	 




Name:


Title:


 


Accepted and Agreed:


 


	/s/ Kevin Clarke	 




Kevin Clarke
ACCEPTED

225EFJ017359179 

FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS

DALLAS, TEXAS

13 March 5 A9:54

Lisa Matz

CLERK

05-13-00315-CV FILED IN 5th COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 3/5/2013 9:54:27 AM LISA MATZ Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 3 (Monday, January 6, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 631]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-88]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Air Force

32 CFR Part 813


Schedule of Fees for Copying, Certifying and Searching Records 
and Other Documentary Material

AGENCY: Department of the Air Force, Department of Defense.

ACTION: Final rule; removal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Air Force is amending Title 32, Chapter 
VII of the CFR by removing Part 813, Schedule of Fees for Copying, 
Certifying and Searching Records and Other Documentary Material. This 
rule is removed because the source document has been rescinded.

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 6, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Patsy J. Conner, Air Force Federal 
Register Liaison Officer, SAF/AAX, 1720 Air Force Pentagon, Washington 
DC 20330-1720, telephone (703) 697-4191.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 813

    Freedom of information.

    Authority: 10 U.S.C. 8013.

PART 813--[REMOVED]

    Accordingly, 32 CFR, Chapter VII, is amended by removing part 813.
Patsy J. Conner,
Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-88 Filed 1-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3910-01-P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6456
NELSON JACKSON MORRIS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RON ANGELONE, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (CA-95-610-R) Submitted: July 23, 1996 Decided: August 5, 1996 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Nelson Jackson Morris, Appellant Pro Se. Robert B. Condon, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his habeas corpus petition, 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988), as amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1217. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal; to the extent that a certificate of appealability is required, we deny such a certificate. We dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Morris v. Angelone , No. CA-95-610-R (W.D. Va. Mar. 19, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 78 (Monday, April 23, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24200-24201]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9696]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[CERCLA-04-2012-3770, FRL-9663-8]

American Drum & Pallet, Memphis, Shelby County, TN; Notice of 
Settlement

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice of settlement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation 
and Liability Act (CERCLA), the United States Environmental Protection 
Agency has entered into a settlement for reimbursement of past response 
costs concerning the American Drum and Pallet Superfund Site located in 
Memphis, Shelby County, Tennessee for publication.

[[Page 24201]]

DATES: The Agency will consider public comments on the settlement until 
May 23, 2012. The Agency will consider all comments received and may 
modify or withdraw its consent to the settlement if comments received 
disclose facts or considerations which indicate that the settlement is 
inappropriate, improper, or inadequate.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the settlement are available from Ms. Paula V. 
Painter. Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. CERCLA-04-
2012-3770 or Site name American Drum & Pallet Superfund Site by one of 
the following methods:
    www.epa.gov/region4/superfund/programs/enforcement/enforcement.htm1.
     Email: Painter.Paula@epa.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paula V. Painter at 404/562-8887.

    Dated: April 9, 2012.
Anita L. Davis,
Chief, Superfund Enforcement & Information Management Branch, Superfund 
Division.
[FR Doc. 2012-9696 Filed 4-20-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 24.1

                              ROBBINS & MYERS, INC.

                            LIMITED POWER OF ATTORNEY

            WHEREAS, Robbins & Myers, Inc. (the "Company") intends to file with
the Securities and Exchange Commission its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended August 31, 2005:

            NOW, THEREFORE, each of the undersigned in his capacity as a
director of the Company hereby appoints Peter C. Wallace his true and lawful
attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution,
to execute in his name, place and stead, the Company's Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended August 31, 2005, (including any amendment to such
report) and any and all other instruments necessary or incidental in connection
therewith, and to file the same with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Said attorney shall have full power and authority to do and perform in the name
and on behalf of the undersigned, in the aforesaid capacity, every act
whatsoever necessary or desirable to be done, as fully to all intents and
purposes as the undersigned might or could do in person. The undersigned hereby
ratifies and approves the act of said attorney.

            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this instrument
this 29th day of November, 2005.

                                          /s/ Thomas P. Loftis
                                          ---------------------------------
                                          Thomas P. Loftis

                                          /s/ Daniel W. Duval
                                          ---------------------------------
                                          Daniel W. Duval

                                          /s/ David T. Gibbons
                                          ---------------------------------
                                          David T. Gibbons

                                          /s/ Robert J. Kegerreis
                                          ---------------------------------
                                          Robert J. Kegerreis

                                          /s/ William D. Manning
                                          ---------------------------------
                                          William D. Manning

                                          /s/ Dale L. Medford
                                          ---------------------------------
                                          Dale L. Medford

                                          /s/ Jerome F. Tatar
                                          ---------------------------------
                                          Jerome F. Tatar

75
#### State v. Armand

109,416

02/12/14

Denied

Unpublished
#### FRANKIE TRIMMER v. SCOTT SEMPLE, WARDEN, ET AL.

(AC 34938)

Alvord, Bear and Flynn, Js.

Argued September 12

officially released October 1, 2013

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed.
# C_2023252EN.01000901.xml

| 17.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/9

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 25 May 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht für Zivilrechtssachen Graz — Austria) — TLL The Longevity Labs GmbH v Optimize Health Solutions mi GmbH, BM

(Case C-141/22, (1) TLL The Longevity Labs)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Food safety - Novel food - Regulation (EU) 2015/2283 - Sprouted buckwheat flour with a high spermidine content - Germination of buckwheat seeds in a nutrient solution containing spermidine)

(2023/C 252/08)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landesgericht für Zivilrechtssachen Graz

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: TLL The Longevity Labs GmbH

Defendant: Optimize Health Solutions mi GmbH, BM

Operative part of the judgment

Article 3(2)(a)(iv) of Regulation (EU) 2015/2283 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2015 on novel foods, amending Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Regulation (EC) No 258/97 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1852/2001

must be interpreted as meaning that a food, such as sprouted buckwheat flour with a high spermidine content, which was not used for human consumption to a significant degree within the European Union before 15 May 1997, constitutes a ‘novel food’ within the meaning of that provision given that, first, it is obtained from a plant, secondly, it is not apparent that its safety has been confirmed with compositional data and from experience of continued use for at least 25 years in the customary diet of a significant number of people in at least one country of the European Union, and, thirdly and in any event, it is not obtained by propagating practices, within the meaning of that provision.

---

(1)  OJ C 198, 16.5.2022.

---
#### State v. Munoz

111,681

03/28/2016

Denied.

Unpublished
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 54 (Thursday, March 20, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 13401]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-7023]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Special Emphasis Panel in Design, Manufacture, and Industrial 
Innovation; Meetings

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Design, Manufacture, and 
Industrial Innovation--(1194).
    Date and Time: April 9, 1997; 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m.
    Place: Room 410, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson 
Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Mr. Darryl Gorman, Program Manager, Small 
Business Technology Transfer, (703) 306-1391, Dr. Joseph Hennessey, 
Program Manager, Small Business Innovation Research, (703) 306-1391, 
National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 
22230.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to the NSF's SBIR and STTR Program.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate SBIR and STTR Phase II proposals 
as part of the selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information, financial data such as salaries, and personal 
informaiton concerning individuals associated with the proposals. 
These matters that are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (4) and (6) of 
the Government in the Sunshine Act would be improperly disclosed.

    Dated: March 17, 1997.
Linda Allen-Benton,
Deputy Director, Division of Human Resource Management, Acting 
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-7023 Filed 3-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT GINNIE H. WOOTEN, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. SOUTHERN BELL TELEPHONE & No. 96-1480 TELEGRAPH COMPANY, INCORPORATED, a/k/a Bell South Telecommunications, Incorporated, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-95-349-5-BO) Submitted: October 3, 1996 Decided: October 15, 1996 Before ERVIN,* LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________ Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________ COUNSEL Randy Meares, BYRD & MEARES, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Paul T. Stagliano, BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICA-

_________________________________________________________________ *Judge Ervin did not participate in consideration of this case. The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d).TIONS, INC., Atlanta, Georgia; Robert E. Thomas, Jr., BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC., Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________ Unpublished opinions are not binding pr ecedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________ OPINION PER CURIAM: Ginnie H. Wooten appeals from the district court's order grantingsummary judgment in favor of Defendant and dismissing her employment discrimination action pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. § 2000e (West 1994). Wooten alleged discrimination on the basis of her race (black). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Wooten failed to establish a primafacie case of employment discrimination. See O'Connor v. Consolidated Coin Caterers Corp. , ___ U.S. #6D 6D6D#, 64 U.S.L.W. 4243 (U.S. Apr. 1, 1996) (No. 95-354); see also McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green , 411 U.S. 792, 802 (1973); Alvarado v. Board of Trustees , 928F.2d 118, 121 (4th Cir. 1991). Moreover, she failed to rebut the legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason Defendant proffered to support its transfer of Wooten. See Conkwright v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp. , 933 F.2d 231, 234-35 (4th Cir. 1991); Texas Dep't of Community Affairs v. Burdine , 450 U.S. 248, 253, 256 (1981).Accordingly, we cannot say that the district court's finding of nondiscrimination was clearly erroneous. Anderson v. City of Bessemer , 470 U.S. 564, 574 (1985). We therefore affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 65 (Friday, April 4, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16172-16173]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-8588]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


National Institutes of Health

National Library of Medicine, Notice of Meeting of the Board of 
Scientific Counselors

    Pursuant to Pub. L. 92-463, notice is hereby given of the meeting 
of the Board of Scientific Counselors, National Library of Medicine, on 
May 15 and May 16, 1997, in the Board Room of the National Library of 
Medicine, Building 38, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, Maryland.
    The meeting will be open to the public from 9:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. 
and from 2:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. on May 15 and from 9:00 a.m. to 
approximately 12 noon on May 16 for the review of research and 
development programs and preparation of reports of the Lister Hill 
National Center for Biomedical Communications. Attendance by the public 
will be limited to space available. Individuals who plan to attend and 
need special assistance, such as sign

[[Page 16173]]

language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should 
contact Ms. Jackie Duley at (301) 496-4441 in advance of the meeting.
    In accordance with provisions set forth in sec. 552b(c)(6), Title 
5, U.S.C., and sec. 10(d) of Pub. L. 92-463, the meeting will be closed 
to the public on May 15, from approximately 1:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m. for 
the consideration of personnel qualifications and performance of 
individual investigators and similar items, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
    The Executive Secretary, Dr. Harold M. Schoolman, Acting Director, 
Lister Hill National Center for Biomedical Communications, National 
Library of Medicine, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, Maryland 20894, 
telephone (301) 496-4441, will furnish summaries of the meeting, 
rosters of committee members, and substantive program information.

    Dated: March 31, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-8588 Filed 4-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M