alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| | Refineries (29)All (20-39)Food (20)Textiles (22)Apparel (23)Lumber (24)Furniture (25)Paper (26)Printing (27)Chemicals (28)Rubber (30)Stone, Clay & Glass(32)Primary Metals (33)Fabricated Metals (34)Machinery (35)Electronic Equipment (36)Instruments (38)Miscellaneous Manufacturing (39)
    This major group
    includes establishments primarily engaged in petroleum refining, manufacturing paving and
    roofing materials, and compounding lubricating oils and greases from purchased materials.If you found this information useful,
    please try...Energy
        Consumption
      Use of
        Energy
      Electricity
      Manufacturing
        Floorspace
      Prices
      Energy
        Storage
      Energy and
        Operating Ratios
      Energy-Management
        Activities
      Technology
      Fuel-Switching
        Capability
      Motors | Figure on  ratio of energy consumed per 1992 constant dollar for SIC 29***Source: Table 12 of this
    report.***Figure on energy consumed by quadrillion Btu for SIC 29***Sources: Energy Information Administration, 1985, 1988, 1991,
    and 1994 MECS.***
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

arrow to top of pageTop
of Pagearrow to previous pageEnergy Intensity Page



File Last Modified: 8/25/98

Contact:
  robert.adler@eia.doe.gov
  Robert Adler
  MECS Survey Manager
  Phone: (202) 586-1134
  Fax: (202) 586-0018

mark.schipper@eia.doe.gov
  Mark Schipper
  Phone: (202) 586-1136
  Fax: (202) 586-0018

http://www.eia.gov/emeu/mecs/mecs94/ei/**ei_29.html**separater lineIf you are having any technical
problems with this site, please contact the EIA Webmaster at wmaster@eia.doe.gov separater line
Exhibit 10-4



AMENDMENT NO. 2
TO
THE ENERGY EAST CORPORATION
DIRECTOR SHARE PLAN





The Energy East Corporation Director Share Plan (the "Plan") is hereby amended effective, June 8, 2006, pursuant to Article IX thereof, as follows:



"Commencing July 1, 2006 and on each January 1, April 1, July 1, and October 1 thereafter, 625 Phantom Shares will be granted to each Director who is a Plan Participant as of that date."







|                                                            | ENERGY EAST CORPORATION                                                                                                      
|----------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/Michelle Taylor                           
      Witness | By: /s/Richard R. Benson            Richard R. Benson
            Vice President and
            Chief Administrative Officer
#### State v. Frost

106,375

10/01/13

Denied. ...

48 Kan. App. 2d 332
#### State v. Bennett

111,362

11/20/2015

Denied.

51 Kan. App. 2d 356
DENY; and Opinion Filed September 12, 2018 .

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 18
- 00980
- CV IN RE TUNAD ENTERPRI SES, INC. , Relator Original Proceeding from the 417th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 417
- 00618
- 2016 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Brown, and Boatright Opinion by Justice Boatright The underlying proceeding is a suit to recover a security deposit brought by the real party in interest Martin Palma d/b/a Liz Palma (“Palma”) against his former landlord, relator Tunad Enterprises, Inc. In this original proceeding, relator complains of the trial court’s August 30, 2018 written order denying relator’s request for attorney’s fees incurred in a prior mandamus proceeding
in this Court and of the trial court’s failure to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law following that order . Relator also complains of the trial court’s verbal rulings on August 30, 2018 compelling relator to respond to discovery in aid of judgment, ordering $10,000 as sanctions against relator , and requiring payment of the monetary sanctions before trial despite relator’s purported inability to pay. To be entitled to mandamus re lief, a relator must show both that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co. , 148 S.W.3d 124, 135

– 36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Based on the record before us, we co nclude relator ha s not shown it is entitled to the relief requested.– 2

–

Relator has an adequate remedy on appeal regarding the denial of fees for the prior mandamus proceeding. See In re Cousins , 551 S.W.3d 913, 920 (Tex. App.

— Tyler 2018, orig. proceeding) (ordinary appeal of the order denying motion for fees provided adequate remedy where relator could pursue his claims, “eventual outcome had not been pre

- determined by trial court's ruling, and there was no danger that an appellate court would be unable to cure any error through ordinary appeal or that error could not be made part of the appellate record”).
As for the verbal rulings, the trial court has not signed a written sanctions order or a written discovery order , and relator has not provided a repor ter ’ s record of the hearing at which the verba l ruling s w ere made. Under these circumstances, the verb al ruling s are not subject to mandamus review and may not be stayed

. See In re Cokinos , No. 05

- 16

- 01331

- CV, 2016 WL 7163968, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Dallas Nov. 16, 2016, orig. proceeding ) (mem. op.) (denying mandamus where relator did not file a written order or record of a verb al order ) (internal citations omitted); see also In re Bledsoe , 41 S.W.3d 8 07, 812 (Tex. App.

— Fort Worth 2001, orig. proceeding) ( verb al ruling is subject to mandamus review only if it is clear, specific, and enforceable). Accordingly, we deny relator ’s petition for writ of mandamus. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52.8(a) (the court must d eny the petition if the court determines relator is not entitled to the relief sought).

180980F.P05 /Jason Boatright/ JASON BOATRIGHT JUSTICE
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 131141 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 131141 

 COA: 263771 
 Wayne CC: 85-001537

KENNETH D. MILTON,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 16, 2006 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

d1023 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2006 

 Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 56 (Monday, March 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 13870]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-7285]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

AGENCY: United States Air Force, Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Title and associated forms: Department of Defense/United States Air 
Force USAF Military Aircraft Overflight Study.
    Type of Request: New collection.
    Number of Respondents: 1,500.
    Responses Per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 1,500.
    Average Burden Per Response: 10 minutes.
    Annual Burden Hours: 250.
    Needs and Uses: This collection of information is necessary to 
obtain acoustical noise date and visitor survey data, to estimate a 
dose-response relationship between sounds from military aircraft 
overflights and effects (reactions) on visitors to National Park 
Service (NPS) areas. Concurrent with the on-site interviews, sound 
recordings of the exposure to aircraft overflights will be taken to 
determine the ``noise dose'' experience by each visitor. A minimum of 
300 visitors and a maximum of 500 visitors will be surveyed at each of 
three potential sites over a period of 4-5 days at each site. This 
study builds upon research conducted by the NPS to examine the dose-
response relationship between sightseeing aircraft overflights and NPS 
visitor reactions. Because of the different characteristics of sounds 
from military aircraft, the dose-response relationship for military 
aircraft overflights may be quite different from the relationship 
developed for sightseeing aircraft.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Frequency: One time.
    Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
    OMB Desk Officer: Mr. Edward C. Springer.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Mr. Springer at the Office of Management 
and Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    DOD Clearance Officer: Mr. Robert Cushing.
    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Mr. Cushing, WHS/DIOR, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, 
Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302.

    Dated: March 18, 1997.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 97-7285 Filed 3-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
EXHIBIT 32

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned
officer of Symmetricom, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:



Date: September 10, 2008/s/THOMAS W. STEIPPThomas W. Steipp Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)


*    *    *    *    *

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned
officer of Symmetricom, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:



Date: September 10, 2008/s/WILLIAM SLATERWilliam Slater Executive Vice President Finance and Administration,
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


---



QuickLinks
No. 105,458

#### In the Matter of Michael E. Foster, *Respondent*

(294 P.3d 250)

Dated this 18th day of January, 2013.

On August 19, 2011, this court suspended the respondent, Michael E. Foster, from the practice of law in Kansas for a period of 6 months. See *In re Michael E. Foster,*292 Kan. 940, 258 P.3d 375 (2011). Before reinstatement, the respondent was required to pay the costs of the disciplinary action and comply with Supreme Court Rule 218 (2012 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 397) and Supreme Court Rule 219 (2012 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 398).

On June 15, 2012, Michael E. Foster filed a petition with this court for reinstatement to the practice of law in Kansas. The petition was referred to the Disciplinary Administrator for consideration by the Kansas Board for Discipline of Attorneys, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 219. The Disciplinary Administrator affirmed that the respondent met all requirements set forth by the court.

The court, after carefully considering the record, grants the respondent’s petition for reinstatement.

It Is Therefore Ordered that the respondent be reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Kansas conditioned upon his compliance with the annual continuing legal education requirements and upon his payment of all fees required by the Clerk of the Appellate Courts and the Kansas Continuing Legal Education Commission. When the respondent has complied with the annual continuing legal education requirements and has paid the fees required by the Clerk of the Appellate Courts and the Kansas Continuing Legal Education Commission, the Clerk is directed to enter respondent’s name upon the roster of attorneys engaged in the practice of law in Kansas.

It Is Further Ordered that this order of reinstatement of Michael E. Foster shall be published in the Kansas Reports, and the costs of tire reinstatement proceedings are assessed to the respondent.
<PAGE>   1
                                                               EXHIBIT (10) (WW)

                               AMENDMENT NUMBER 2
                        THE REYNOLDS AND REYNOLDS COMPANY
                      RETIREE MEDICAL SAVINGS ACCOUNT PLAN

         The Reynolds and Reynolds Company (the "Company") established The
Reynolds and Reynolds Company Retiree Medical Savings Account Plan (the "Plan")
effective as of October 1, 1993. Thereafter, the Company has amended the Plan,
the most recent amendment being Amendment Number 1 effective October 1, 1993.
The Company desires to further amend the Plan as follows effective October 1,
1993:

1.       Article IV is amended by the restating the first paragraph of Section
         4.7 which shall read as follows:

         A Participant's vested interest in his Separate Account shall be zero
         percent until the Participant has completed three years of Vesting
         Service at which time his vested interest in his Separate Account shall
         be 100 percent. For Participant's hired on or before October 1, 1993,
         vesting will be determined from October 1, 1993. Otherwise, vesting
         will be determined from a Participant's date of hire.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The Reynolds and Reynolds Company has caused this
Amendment to be execute by its duly authorized officers on this 14 day of
March, 1997.


                                         THE REYNOLDS AND REYNOLDS COMPANY

                                         By /s/ Thomas J. Momchilov
                                            ------------------------------------

                                         Title  V.P. Corporate Human Resources
                                               ---------------------------------
##### 



(a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 DATE: November 1, 2006
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Henry L. NordhoffHenry L. NordhoffChairman, President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer
No. 12-5421.

#### Riggs *v.*Tucker, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 66 (Monday, April 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 16595]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-8848]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Division of Research Grants; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
Division of Research Grants Special Emphasis Panel (SEP) meetings:

    Purpose/Agenda: To review individual grant applications.
    Name of SEP: Biological and Physiological Sciences.
    Date: April 27, 1997.
    Time: 9:00 a.m.
    Place: NIH, Rockledge 2, Room 5200, Telephone Conference.
    Contact Person: Dr. Bob Weller, Scientific Review Administrator, 
6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5200, Bethesda, Maryland 20892 (301) 435-
1259.

    Name of SEP: Microbiological and Immunological Sciences.
    Date: May 8, 1997.
    Time: 1:30 p.m.
    Place: NIH, Rockledge 2, Room 4182, Telephone Conference.
    Contact Person: Dr. William Branche, Jr., Scientific Review 
Administrator, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 4182, Bethesda, Maryland 
20892 (301) 435-1148.

    The meetings will be closed in accordance with the provisions 
set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: April 2, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-8848 Filed 4-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 99.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

     Pursuant  to  Section  906 of the  Public  Company  Accounting  Reform  and
Investor  Protection  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.ss.  1350,  as adopted),  William B.
Heye, the Chief Executive  Officer of SBE, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies
that, to the best of his knowledge:

     1. The Company's  Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31,
     2002,  to which  this  Certification  is  attached  as  Exhibit  99.1  (the
     "Periodic  Report"),  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the
     period  covered by the  Periodic  Report and results of  operations  of the
     Company for the period covered by the Periodic Report.

Dated:   January 24, 2003

/s/ William B. Heye Jr.
--------------------------------------------
William B. Heye Jr.
Chief Executive Officer




<PAGE>
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 409 

Calling on members of the Parliament in Uganda to reject the proposed 

‘‘Anti-Homosexuality Bill’’, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 4, 2010 

Mr. FEINGOLD (for himself, Mr. COBURN, Mr. CARDIN, and Ms. COLLINS) 

submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 

on Foreign Relations 

RESOLUTION 

Calling on members of the Parliament in Uganda to reject 

the proposed ‘‘Anti-Homosexuality Bill’’, and for other 

purposes. 

Whereas a bill introduced on October 14, 2009, by a member 

of Parliament in Uganda would expand penalties for homosexuality to include the death penalty and requires 

citizens to report information about homosexuality to the 

police or face imprisonment; 

Whereas many countries criminalize homosexuality, and in 

some countries, such as Iran, Nigeria, Saudi Arabia, and 

Sudan, the penalty for homosexuality includes the death 

penalty; 

Whereas the United States, in seeking to promote the core 

American principles of equality and ‘‘Life, Liberty, and 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 409 IS 

the pursuit of Happiness,’’ has long championed the universality of human rights; 

Whereas religious leaders in the United States, along with 

representatives from the Vatican and the Anglican 

Church, have stated that laws criminalizing homosexuality are unjust; and 

Whereas the people and Government of the United States 

recognize that such laws undermine our commitment to 

combating HIV/AIDS globally through the President’s 

Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) by stigmatizing and criminalizing vulnerable communities: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) calls on members of the Parliament in 

3 Uganda to reject the ‘‘Anti-Homosexuality Bill’’ re4 cently proposed in that country; 

5 (2) urges the governments of all countries to re6 ject and repeal similar criminalization laws; and 

7 (3) encourages the Secretary of State to closely 

8 monitor human rights abuses that occur because of 

9 sexual orientation and to encourage the repeal or re10 form of laws such as the proposed ‘‘Anti-Homosex11 uality Bill’’ in Uganda that permit such abuses. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS