alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
================================================================================

Exhibit 32.1

          CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
                     OFFICER OF SPARTA SURGICAL CORPORATION
              FORM 10-QSB/A FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MAY 31, 2007
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES -OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I am the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Sparta Surgical
Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company". I am delivering this
certificate in connection with the Form 10-QSB/A of the Company for the three
months ended May 31, 2007 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
("Form 10-QSB/A").

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
the Form 10-QSB/A fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Form 10-QSB/A fairly presents, in all material
respect, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: March 14, 2008                                /s/ Allan J. Korn
                                                    -----------------
                                                    Allan J. Korn
                                                    Chief Executive Officer and
                                                    Chief Financial Officer













--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
================================================================================

Exhibit 32.1

          CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
                     OFFICER OF SPARTA SURGICAL CORPORATION
               FORM 10-QSB FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MAY 31, 2004
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES -OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I am the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Sparta Surgical
Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company". I am delivering this
certificate in connection with the Form 10-QSB of the Company for the three
months ended May 31, 2004 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
("Form 10-QSB").

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
the Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respect, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: June 29,2006                             /s/ Allan J. Korn
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Allan J. Korn
                                               Chief Executive Officer
                                               Chief Financial Officer






















--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
S95A0732.

#### BROOKS v. CLAYTON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS.

(458 SE2d 355)

Decided June 26, 1995.

*George T. Brown, Jr.,*for appellant.

*Hecht & Sellers, Gregg K. Hecht,*for appellee.

Hunt, Chief Justice.

Jerri Brooks brought a petition for mandamus against the Clayton County Board of Commissioners seeking an order requiring the Board to pay her for alleged past due and future amounts for travel and contingent expenses as a court reporter. The trial court denied the petition, finding Brooks had not shown a clear legal right to the relief she sought from the Board. The trial court correctly held mandamus is not an available remedy for Brooks’ claims. See generally *DeKalb County v. Publix Super Markets,*264 Ga. 739, 741 (1) (452 SE2d 471) (1994). Therefore, we affirm.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
# Table L2

# RSE
No. 12-5339.

#### Conyers *v.*Pistole, Administrator, Transportation Security Administration, Department of Homeland Security.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
                        
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars              
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               FEB-28-1999          
<PERIOD-START>                  MAR-01-1998    
<PERIOD-END>                    NOV-30-1998    
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                            1    
<CASH>                             1,509,643   
<SECURITIES>                               0    
<RECEIVABLES>                     10,224,650    
<ALLOWANCES>                         743,000   
<INVENTORY>                        9,766,198   
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  26,466,154   
<PP&E>                            10,721,728   
<DEPRECIATION>                     2,940,636   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    37,895,403   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              7,178,892   
<BONDS>                            5,999,262   
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0  
<PREFERRED>                                0  
<COMMON>                              57,975    
<OTHER-SE>                        24,001,274          
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      37,895,403   
<SALES>                           31,920,886   
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  31,920,886   
<CGS>                             30,473,059   
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     30,473,059   
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           0   
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0   
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   859,663   
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   (8,800,360)   
<INCOME-TAX>                      (2,921,345)              
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               (5,879,015)  
<DISCONTINUED>                             0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0   
<CHANGES>                                  0   
<NET-INCOME>                      (5,879,015)   
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          (1.01)  
<EPS-DILUTED>                          (1.01)        
        


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 59 (Thursday, March 27, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 14697]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-7771]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[AK-962-1410-00-P]


Alaska; Notice for Publication, AA-6703-A2; Alaska Native Claims 
Selection

    In accordance with Departmental regulation 43 CFR 2650.7(d), notice 
is hereby given that a decision to issue conveyance under the 
provisions of Sec. 14(a) of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act of 
December 18, 1971, 43 U.S.C. 1601, 1613(a), will be issued to The 
Tatitlek Corporation for approximately 1,850 acres. The lands involved 
are in the vicinity of Tatitlek, Alaska.

Copper River Meridian, Alaska

T. 13 S., R. 7 W.,
    Secs. 25 and 27;
    Secs. 34, 35 and 36.
T. 14 S., R. 7 W.,
    Secs. 2 and 3.

    A notice of the decision will be published once a week, for four 
(4) consecutive weeks, in the ANCHORAGE DAILY NEWS. Copies of the 
decision may be obtained by contacting the Alaska State Office of the 
Bureau of Land Management, 222 West Seventh Avenue, #13, Anchorage, 
Alaska 99513-7599 ((907) 271-5960).
    Any party claiming a property interest which is adversely affected 
by the decision, an agency of the Federal government or regional 
corporation, shall have until April 28, 1997 to file an appeal. 
However, parties receiving service by certified mail shall have 30 days 
from the date of receipt to file an appeal. Appeals must be filed in 
the Bureau of Land Management at the address identified above, where 
the requirements for filing an appeal may be obtained. Parties who do 
not file an appeal in accordance with the requirements of 43 CFR Part 
4, Subpart E, shall be deemed to have waived their rights.
Patricia K. Underwood,
Land Law Examiner, ANCSA Team Branch of 962 Adjudication.
[FR Doc. 97-7771 Filed 3-26-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JA-P
EXHIBIT 99.1


                         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                          18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,
                          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of International Automated Systems,
Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Neldon Johnson, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in  all
          material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results   of
          operation of the Company.


 /s/  Neldon Johnson
___________________________
Neldon Johnson
President and Chief Executive Officer
November 18, 2002



EXHIBIT 99.1


                         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                          18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,
                          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of International Automated Systems,
Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, LaGrand Johnson, Chief Financial Officer and Director, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in  all
          material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results   of
          operation of the Company.


/s/  LaGrand Johnson
___________________________
LaGrand Johnson
Chief Financial Officer
November 18, 2002
Bar Docket No. 21526

#### In the Matter of Steven T. Majors, *Respondent.*

(360 P.3d 418)

In a letter signed September 30, 2015, addressed to the Clerk of tire Appellate Courts, respondent Steven T. Majors, an attorney admitted to practice law in Kansas, voluntarily surrendered his license to practice law in Kansas, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 217 (2014 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 403).

At the time the respondent surrendered his license, a hearing on a formal complaint was scheduled before the Kansas Board for Discipline of Attorneys. The formal complaint alleged that the respondent violated Kansas Rules of Professional Conduct 1.4 (2014 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 495) (communication), 1.7 (2014 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 531) (conflict of interest), 1.15 (2014 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 567) (safekeeping property), 1.16 (Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 583) (declining or terminating representation), 8.1 (2014 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 670) (disciplinary matters), 8.3 (2014 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 678) (reporting misconduct), 8.4 (2014 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 680) (misconduct), and Supreme Court Rule 208 (2014 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 356) (registration of attorneys).

This court, having examined the files of the office of the Disci-plinaiy Administrator, finds that the surrender of the respondent’s license should be accepted and that the respondent should be disbarred.

It Is Therefore Ordered that Steven T. Majors be and he is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in Kansas, and his license and privilege to practice law are hereby revoked.

It Is Further Ordered that the Clerk of the Appellate Courts strike the name of Steven T. Majors from tire roll of attorneys licensed to practice law in Kansas.

It Is Further Ordered that this order shall be published in the Kansas Reports, that the costs herein shall be assessed to the *971respondent, and that the respondent forthwith shall comply with Supreme Court Rule 218 (2014 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 414).

Dated this 27th day of October, 2015.
No. 12-5350.

#### Washington *v.*Maryland.

Ct. Sp. App. Md. Certiorari denied.
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 353 

Supporting the goals and ideals of ‘‘American Education Week’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 10, 2009 

Mrs. HAGAN (for herself, Mr. JOHANNS, Mr. BROWN, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. 

BEGICH, Mr. TESTER, Mr. FEINGOLD, Mr. BURRIS, Ms. MIKULSKI, Mr. 

DODD, and Ms. STABENOW) submitted the following resolution; which 

was referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

NOVEMBER 18, 2009 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of ‘‘American Education 

Week’’. 

Whereas the National Education Association has designated 

November 15 through November 21, 2009, as the 88th 

annual observance of ‘‘American Education Week’’; 

Whereas public schools are the backbone of democracy in the 

United States, providing young people with the tools 

needed to maintain the precious values of freedom, civility, and equality in our Nation; 

Whereas by equipping young people in the United States with 

both practical skills and broader intellectual abilities, 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 353 ATS 

public schools give young people hope for, and access to, 

a productive future; 

Whereas people working in the field of public education, including teachers, higher education faculty and staff, 

custodians, substitute educators, bus drivers, clerical 

workers, food service professionals, workers in skilled 

trades, health and student service workers, security 

guards, technical employees, and librarians, work tirelessly to serve children and communities throughout the 

Nation with care and professionalism; and 

Whereas public schools are community linchpins, bringing together adults, children, educators, volunteers, business 

leaders, and elected officials in a common enterprise: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) supports the goals and ideals of ‘‘American 

3 Education Week’’; and 

4 (2) encourages the people of the United States 

5 to observe ‘‘American Education Week’’ by reflecting 

6 on the positive impact of all those who work together 

7 to educate children. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
No. 12-5649.

#### Askew *v.*United States.

C. A. 7th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
.... >	 0:, 

Richard Sprott To Richard Long/P2/R8/USEPA/US@EPA. Jonah 

<RSPROTT@utah.gov> Staller/RC/R8/USEPNUS@EPA, Ron 

RutherfordlENF/RBlUSEPA/US@EPA. ' 12/09/200402:10 PM 

cc	 Bill Sinclair <BSINCLAIR@utah.gov>, Dianne Nielson 

<DNIELSON@utah.gov> 

bee 

SUbject Excess Emissions Rule Meeting 

As	 each of you are aware, DAQ has been workini on an excess 

emissions rule for quite some time. We received some pretty strong 

feedback regarding the proposal that went out for comment so we will not 

be taking that version to the Air Quality Broard for approval. 

However, we do need to move forward with an improved rule. A 

number of you indicated a willingness to seek solutions so we would like 

to	 get key interested parties together to disucss the issues and how we 

might go forward. We think it would be helpful to better understand the 

basis for EPA's excess emissions policy and the concerns that business 

might 'have. We will be addressing conceptual issues and do not intend 

to	 discuss specific rule language, etc. at this point. Hopefully, this 

might lead to ideas that will help in a new process. 

The attached provides a bit more detail, but we are looking at 

Tues or Wed, Jan 18 or 19 from about 10-3. We could include a .working 

lunch. Please let me know ASAP if either of these days would work for 

you. I'll get back later with more details on agenda. If any of you 

have suggestions for the meeting, we'll be happy to take those, 

For Dick and Jonah: Please forward to others in EPA. who may be 

attending whose names I don't have at this point. Thanks, Rick 

/ 'Excess Emission; Meeling. 01 -05,doc 

.	 , 

fa '/11 CY?- f</N: 

6C62-(05 -ora 
• " I 

Excess Emissions Rule Meeting 

Purpose: Explore how to advance an improved excess emissions rule for Utah. The meeting 

will provide an opportunity to explain the basis and background for EPA's excess emissions 

policy and for the regulated community to ask questions and explain any concerns they may 

have. We hope to get an understanding of the key issues for each group that will assist in 

crafting a new rule in the future. We will not be discussing specific language or proposals at this 

meeting.. 

Date and Location: lOAM -3 PM, TBA (Tuesday or Wednesday, January 18 or 19?), Room
 

TBA
 

Background: The USEPA updated its policy on excess emissions in a joint memo from OECA 

and OAR in 1999. Region VIII has requested that Utah revise its Unavoidable Breakdown Rule 

to be consistent with the new EPA policy. UDAQ has been working on the update for several 

years and very intensely during 2004. A rule was proposed for comment by the Utah Air Quality 

Board. The proposa! drew strong comments from all sides and will not be brought forward in its 

current form. 

invitees: 

State of Utah . HQEPA 

Rick Sprott Ron Rutherford - OECA 

.Cheryl Heying OAQPS 

.R~gg Olsen OGe 

.Bryce.Bird • 

FreclNelson Regulated Community 

Chris Stephens Dennis Arfmann 

Reed Searle 

',EPA Region 8 Steve Christiansen 

Dick Long Mike Tomko 

Regiona! Counsel Rep(s) Mike Jenkins 

:-Air Program Staff Member Jim Holtkamp 

Lee Peacock 

.• t,
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>5
       
<S>                                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                                     MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                                               2068211
<SECURITIES>                                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                            374
<ALLOWANCES>                                                               0
<INVENTORY>                                                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                           0
<PP&E>                                                                     0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                             0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                       2068585
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                      0
<BONDS>                                                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                                0
<COMMON>                                                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                                                           1548735
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                         2068585
<SALES>                                                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                      233496
<CGS>                                                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                              0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                      182685
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                         0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                        50811
<INCOME-TAX>                                                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                    50811
<DISCONTINUED>                                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                                           50811
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                         (0.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                              0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 10.2

                               Company Letterhead

                                October 31, 2003

Mr. Morris E. Van Asperen
4161 Riverview Run Ct
Suwanee, GA 30024

Subject:  Employment Agreement Made June 28, 2000, Second Amendment

Dear Van:

In  connection  with the  Employment  Agreement  made June 28, 2000, as amended,
("the  Agreement")  between  you and Color  Imaging,  Inc.  (the  "Employer"  or
"Company"), it is agreed that the following changes shall be effective as of the
date(s) indicated:

          Compensation.  Article III of the Agreement, as previously amended, is
          further amended as follows:

          a)   Section 3.01 paragraph 1 is hereby amended and your  compensation
               shall  consist of a minimum base salary,  which is not subject to
               any offset or deduction  ("Salary"),  and  commission  as defined
               herein,  up to the maximum  compensation of salary and commission
               of $250,000 per calendar year ("Maximum Compensation"). Effective
               December 29,  2003,  your Salary shall be $151,190 per annum paid
               ratably  every two weeks at $5,815.00  per pay period.  Effective
               January 1, 2004,  you will be paid a commission on eligible sales
               which are the total net sales of the Company,  excluding  the net
               sales  for  existing  products  of the  Company  sold to it's two
               largest   customers,   in   aggregate,   which   includes   their
               subsidiaries  or affiliates  that are  currently  accounts of the
               Company  (Eligible  Sales),  subject to the Maximum  Compensation
               limitation. Your commission shall be paid on or after the 15th of
               the month following the end of each calendar  quarter at the rate
               of 1/2 of 1 percent  (0.5%)  on the  cumulative  increase  in the
               Eligible  Sales of the Company  above the Eligible  Sales for the
               respective quarterly year-to-date period in 2003 ("Base Period"),
               less all of the commission  heretofore paid to that date for that
               calendar year. Should any quarterly  year-to-date  period have no
               increase  in  Eligible  Sales,  or a decline in  Eligible  Sales,
               compared to the same  period of the Base  Period,  no  commission
               shall  be  earned  nor  paid for  that  quarterly  period  and no
               deduction or offset will be made to any prior  commission(s) paid
               to you.

To indicate your  understanding  and acceptance of these amendments to the above
referenced Agreement, please sign where indicated hereafter.

Sincerely,                         Acknowledged and accepted:

EMPLOYER                           EMPLOYEE




/S/ SUELING WANG                   /S/ MORRIS E. VAN ASPEREN
_______________________            __________________________
Sueling Wang, Phd                  Morris E. Van Asperen
President


1794045
# Table 10.1

# RSE 10.1

# Microsoft_Word_Document1.docx

# image1.emf

# Microsoft_Word_Document2.docx

# image2.emf
# mecs35