alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 178 

Supporting Olympic Day on June 23, 2009, and encouraging the International 

Olympic Committee to select Chicago, Illinois as the host city for the 

2016 Olympic and Paralympic Games. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 9, 2009 

Mr. DURBIN (for himself, Mr. UDALL of Colorado, Mr. BURRIS, Mr. BENNETT, Mr. BENNET, and Mr. HATCH) submitted the following resolution; 

which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting Olympic Day on June 23, 2009, and encouraging 

the International Olympic Committee to select Chicago, 

Illinois as the host city for the 2016 Olympic and 

Paralympic Games. 

Whereas Olympic Day, June 23, 2009, celebrates the Olympic ideal of developing peace through sport; 

Whereas June 23 marks the anniversary of the founding of 

the modern Olympic movement, the date on which the 

Congress of Paris approved the proposal of Pierre de 

Coubertin to found the modern Olympics; 

Whereas for more than 100 years, the Olympic movement has 

built a more peaceful and better world by educating 

young people through amateur athletics, by bringing toVerDate Nov 24 2008 03:58 Jun 10, 2009 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\SR178.ATS SR178

smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 178 ATS 

gether athletes from many countries in friendly competition, and by forging new relationships bound by friendship, solidarity, and fair play; 

Whereas the United States and Chicago, Illinois advocate the 

ideals of the Olympic movement; 

Whereas hundreds of local governments from across the 

United States are joining together to show their support 

for bringing the Olympic Games to Chicago, Illinois in 

2016; 

Whereas Olympic Day will encourage the development of 

Olympic and Paralympic Sport in the United States; 

Whereas Olympic Day encourages the participation of youth 

of the United States in Olympic and Paralympic sport; 

Whereas Olympic Day will encourage the teaching of Olympic 

history, health, arts, and culture among the youth of the 

United States; 

Whereas Olympic Day will encourage the youth of the United 

States to support the Olympic movement and the selection of Chicago, Illinois as the host city for the 2016 

Olympic and Paralympic Games; and 

Whereas enthusiasm for Olympic and Paralympic sport is at 

an all-time high: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) supports Olympic Day 2009 and the goals 

3 that Olympic Day pursues; and 

4 (2) encourages the International Olympic Com5 mittee to select Chicago, Illinois as the host city for 

6 the 2016 Olympic and Paralympic Games. 

Æ 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 63 (Wednesday, April 2, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 15673]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-8327]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP97-298-000]


Mississippi River Transmission Corporation; Notice of Proposed 
Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

March 27, 1977.
    Take notice that on March 25, 1997, Mississippi River Transmission 
Corporation (MRT) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Third Revised Volume No. 1, the revised tariff sheets listed on 
Appendix A to the filing, with a proposed effective date of May 1, 
1997.
    MRT states that the purpose of this filing is to make corrections, 
eliminate outdated practices, reformat MRT's forms of service agreement 
and Master Capacity Release Agreement, and shorten the time in which 
prospective customers must return executed service agreements.
    MRT states that a copy of this filing is being mailed to each of 
MRT's customers and to the state commissions of Arkansas, Illinois and 
Missouri.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with 18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests should be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion 
to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-8327 Filed 4-1-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 231 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 231

Expressing the sense of the Senate that any health care reform proposal 
should slow the long-term growth of health costs and reduce the growth 
                 rate of Federal health care spending.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 30, 2009

   Mr. Bennett (for himself, Mr. Wyden, Mr. Wicker, Mr. Johanns, Mr. 
 Coburn, and Mr. Crapo) submitted the following resolution; which was 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the Senate that any health care reform proposal 
should slow the long-term growth of health costs and reduce the growth 
                 rate of Federal health care spending.

Whereas health care spending has risen close to 2.4 percentage points faster 
        than gross domestic product (GDP) since 1970; and
Whereas the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services projects health care 
        spending to be 17.6 percent of GDP in 2009 and 20.4 percent of GDP by 
        2018: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that--
            (1) any health care reform proposal should reduce total 
        spending on health care in the United States during the next 
        decade to below current projections by the Centers for Medicare 
        & Medicaid Services; and
            (2) any health care reform proposal should reduce the 
        growth rate of Federal health care spending.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2018447EN.01000901.xml

| 12.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 447/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 447/9

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2018/C 447/16)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

| Date and time of closure | 4.10.2018 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 4.10.2018-31.12.2018 |
| Member State | Portugal |
| Stock or Group of stocks | RJU/9-C. |
| Species | Undulate ray (raja undulata) |
| Zone | Union waters of 9 |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 39/TQ120 |

Date and time of closure

4.10.2018

Duration

4.10.2018-31.12.2018

Member State

Portugal

Stock or Group of stocks

RJU/9-C.

Species

Undulate ray (raja undulata)

Zone

Union waters of 9

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

39/TQ120

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

---
# C_2018167EN.01000401.xml

| 15.5.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 167/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.5.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 167/4

---

Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/705 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine apply

(2018/C 167/04)

The attention of data subjects is drawn to the following information in accordance with Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1):

1

The legal basis for this processing operation is Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 (2), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/705 (3).

2

3

The controller of this processing operation is the Council of the European Union represented by the Director-General of DG C (Foreign Affairs, Enlargement, Civil Protection) of the General Secretariat of the Council and the department entrusted with the processing operation is the Unit 1C of DG C that can be contacted at:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The purpose of the processing operation is the establishment and updating of the list of persons subject to restrictive measures in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 269/2014, as implemented by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/705.

The data subjects are the natural persons who fulfil listing criteria as laid down in that Regulation.

The personal data collected includes data necessary for the correct identification of the person concerned, the Statement of Reasons and any other data related thereto.

The personal data collected may be shared as necessary with the European External Action Service and the Commission.

Without prejudice to restrictions provided for in Article 20(1)(a) and (d) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, requests for access, as well as requests for rectification or objection will be answered in accordance with section 5 of Council Decision 2004/644/EC (4).

4

Personal data will be retained for 5 years from the moment the data subject has been removed from the list of persons subject to the asset freeze or the validity of the measure has expired, or for the duration of court proceedings in the event they had been started.

Data subjects may have recourse to the European Data Protection Supervisor in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.

---

(1)  OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 6.

2

(3)  OJ L 118 I, 14.5.2018, p. 1.

3

(4)  OJ L 296, 21.9.2004, p. 16.

4

---
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 202 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 202

    To provide for issuance of a summons and for related procedures 
     concerning the articles of impeachment against Samuel B. Kent.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 24, 2009

   Mr. Reid (for himself and Mr. McConnell) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    To provide for issuance of a summons and for related procedures 
     concerning the articles of impeachment against Samuel B. Kent.

    Resolved, That a summons shall be issued which commands Samuel B. 
Kent to file with the Secretary of the Senate an answer to the articles 
of impeachment no later than July 2, 2009, and thereafter to abide by, 
obey, and perform such orders, directions, and judgments as the Senate 
shall make in the premises, according to the Constitution and laws of 
the United States.
    Sec. 2.  The Sergeant at Arms is authorized to utilize the services 
of the Deputy Sergeant at Arms or another employee of the Senate in 
serving the summons.
    Sec. 3.  The Secretary shall notify the House of Representatives of 
the filing of the answer and shall provide a copy of the answer to the 
House.
    Sec. 4.  The Managers on the part of the House may file with the 
Secretary of the Senate a replication no later than July 7, 2009.
    Sec. 5.  The Secretary shall notify counsel for Samuel B. Kent of 
the filing of a replication, and shall provide counsel with a copy.
    Sec. 6.  The Secretary shall provide the answer and the 
replication, if any, to the Presiding Officer of the Senate on the 
first day the Senate is in session after the Secretary receives them, 
and the Presiding Officer shall cause the answer and replication, if 
any, to be printed in the Senate Journal and in the Congressional 
Record. If a timely answer has not been filed, the Presiding Officer 
shall cause a plea of not guilty to be entered.
    Sec. 7.  The articles of impeachment, the answer, and the 
replication, if any, together with the provisions of the Constitution 
on impeachment, and the Rules of Procedure and Practice in the Senate 
When Sitting on Impeachment Trials, shall be printed under the 
direction of the Secretary as a Senate document.
    Sec. 8.  The provisions of this resolution shall govern 
notwithstanding any provisions to the contrary in the Rules of 
Procedure and Practice in the Senate When Sitting on Impeachment 
Trials.
    Sec. 9.  The Secretary shall notify the House of Representatives of 
this resolution.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.2**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO 

18 U.S.C. §1350, 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

        Inconnection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Arrhythmia Research Technology, Inc.(the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), theundersigned Chief Financial Officer certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
#### Andra v. Peebler Rev. Trust

106,432

10/17/13

Denied

Unpublished
Exhibit
32(b)


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350





I,
Jeffrey R. Passmore, the principal financial officer of Hallmark Financial
Services, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify that the accompanying report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, and filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended. I further certify that the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.





Date:  August
      13, 2009/s/ Jeffrey R. PassmoreJeffrey
      R. Passmore,Principal
      Financial Officer
Exhibit 32(b)


                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. S 1350

      I, Mark  J. Morrison,  Chief Financial  Officer of  Hallmark  Financial
 Services, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify that the accompanying  report
 on Form 10-Q for the second quarter ended June 30, 2004, and filed with  the
 Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  fully
 complies with the requirements of  Section 13(a) of the Securities  Exchange
 Act of 1934, as amended. I further certify that the information contained in
 the  Report  fairly  presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
 condition and results of operations of the Company.


 Date:     August 13, 2004

                                  /s/ Mark J. Morrison
                                  ----------------------------------------
                                  Mark J. Morrison,
                                  Chief Financial Officer
# San

# Joaqu¡n 

# Valley 

# ?! HEALTHY

# AIR LIVINGAIR POTLUTIflÌ{ CflilTRflL DISTRICT 

### June

### 25,2013 Matthew Lakin, Ph.D. U.S. Environmental Protection 

### Agency, Region 9 

### 75 Havvthorne Street, 

### AIR-7 San Francisco, 

### CA 94105 

### Subject: Annual 

### Air Monitoring Network Plan Dear Dr. Lakin, 

### The San Joaquin 

### Valley Unified 

### Air Pollution 

### Control District (District) submits the enclosed Annual 

### Air Monitoring Network Plan, 

### as required by

### 40 CFR 

### 58.10. This plan satisfies 

### federal requirements of

### 40 CFR 58.10 and addresses 

### comments by EPA from 

### previous plans. 

### A Public Notice

### that announced a

### 30-day inspection period 

### was published in eight 

### Valley newspapers and also posted on

### the District's 

### website. The inspection period started 

### on March 

### 18,2013 andwent through 

### April 

### 18,2013. ln addition, 

### the District held a

### workshop on

### this plan 

### on March 

### 28,2013. Comments 

### were received 

### from Earth Justice on

### April 

### 18,2013. Appendix G of

### this plan contains 

### the District's responses to 

### the comments received on

### April 

### 18,2013 and atthe workshop. lf

### you have any 

### questions about 

### the District's 

### Air Monitoring Network 

### Plan, please 

### contact Errol

### Villegas, Manager of Strategies 

### and lncentives 

### via phone 

### at 559-230-5806 orvia 

### email at errol.villeoas@valleyair.org. 

### The District requests 

### that EPA Region 9forward 

### this planto

### theappropriate recipients 

### at EPA headquarters for

### the PAMS 

### equipment relocation. Thank you, 

## (o, Samir Sheikh Director 

### of Strategies 

### and lncentives

cc: Katherine Hoag, 

### Environmental Protection 

### Agency, Region

# I Meredith Kurpius, Environmental Protection 

### Agency, Region 9 Kenneth Stroud, California 

### Air Resources Board Karen Magliano, California 

### Air Resources Board Seyed Sadredin Execulive 0irectorlAir Pollution Control 0lficer

lìlor1hern Rogion 4800 Enterprise Way Modesto, CA 95356.8718 TsL (2091 557.6400 FAX: (209) 557-8475 Centrol Region (Main Offical 1990 E. Gettysburg Avenue Fresno, CA 53726.0244 Tel: {559) 230.ô000 FAX: (559} 230.6061 Southorn Begion 34946 Flyovsr Court Bakersfield, CA 93308.9725 TeL 661'392.5500 FAX: 661.392.5585 www.valleyair.org www.healthyairliving.com Pñnl.dmræïrLdp.pt.tl
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 09**  **- 6597** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. LOUIS MICHAEL LAZORWITZ , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eas tern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh
. James C. Fox , Senior District Judge. ( 5:04

- cr - 00161

- F

- 1; 5:06

- cv - 00 293

- F )

Submitted : March 31, 2010 Decided: April 23, 2010

Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published pe r curiam opinion
. Louis Michael Lazorwitz, Appellant Pro Se. Anne Margaret Hayes, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Louis Michael Lazo rwitz seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2009) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A cer tificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000);
Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683

- 84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Lazorwitz has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Lazorwitz’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 

### TBD Directorate Identifier: 

### TBD

- AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell

.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection,

replacement)

Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance)

Work

- hours

(include

access, testing,

and close

- up) Labor

cost

(@$8 5 /h

our ) Parts Cost Total Costs

(labor +

parts) Number of

U.S.

Registered

Products Total Cost

for U.S. Fleet



### Inspection 0.5 $ 42.50 $ 42.50 

### 250 $ 10,625.00



### Oil analysis $ 0.00 $500 $ 500.00 

### 250 $ 125,000.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.0 0 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0. 00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00



### The known number of products in com pliance: 

### 0

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 135,625



### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $ 

### 0

On

- Condition Cos ts:

Action

(e.g., Inspection,

replacement) Work

- hours

(include access,

testing, and close

up) Labor cost

(@$85/hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product



### 0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00



### Special considerations for Economic Analysis ( Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### :

### Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES * NO

* Explanation:

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES * NO

* Explanation:

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO

Explanation:

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirement s for

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES * NO



### * Explanation 

### :
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Nigel A. Vinecombe, President and Chief Executive Officer of Multi-Color Corporation (the Company), certify pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 9, 2010



By:

/s/ Nigel A. VinecombeNigel A. VinecombePresident and Chief Executive Officer