alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
RHI Holdings, Inc. --  Subsidiaries as of June 30, 1997:

Banner Aerospace, Inc.[Del] (36.3% by RHI)
     Adams Industries, Inc. [CN]
     Aero International, Inc. [Ohio]
     Aerospace Bearing Support, Inc. [CA]
     Aircraft Bearing Corporation [CA]
     BAI, Inc. [CA]
     Banner Aerospace Foreign Sales Corporation [US Virgin Islands]
     Banner Aerospace Services, Inc. [Ohio]
     Banner Aerospace-Singapore, Inc. [Del]
     Banner Distribution, Inc. [Del]
     Burbank Aircraft Supply, Inc. [Del]
          Burbank Aircraft International, Inc. [Del]
               Burbank Aircraft International, GmbH [Germany]
     DAC International, Inc. [TX]
     Dallas Aerospace, Inc. [TX]
          P. B. Herndon Company [Missouri]
     Discontinued Aircraft, Inc. [TX]
     Discontinued Services, Inc.[Del]
     GCCUS, Inc. [CA]
     Georgetown Jet Center, Inc. [Del]
     Harco, Inc. [Del]
          Harco Aerospace Fasteners, Ltd. [Canada]
               Harco Northern Ireland, Ltd. [N. Ireland--UK]
     Matrix Aviation, Inc. [KS]
     Nasam Incorporated [CA]
     PacAero [CA]
         Banner Aero (Australia) Pty, Ltd. [Australia]
     Professional Aviation Associates, Inc. [GA]
          Professional Aircraft Accessories, Inc. [FL]
     Solair, Inc. [FL]
          Banner Aerospace (U.K.) Limited [U.K.]
     Tri-Fast SARL [France]
Banner Capital Ventures, Inc.[Del]
Banner Industrial Distribution, Inc.[Del]
F. F. Handels GmbH [Germany]
Fairchild France, Inc.[Del]
Fairchild Holding Corp. [Delaware]
     A10 Inc. [Del]
          Fairchild Retiree Medical Services, Inc. [Del]
     Banner Aerospace, Inc. [Del]{23.0% by FHC} 
     Banner Investments (U.K.) Limited [U.K.]
     Fairchild Fastener Group Ltd. [U.K.]
               Camloc (U.K.) Ltd. [U.K.]
     JJS Limited [United Kingdom]
     Fairchild Arms International Ltd. [Canada]
     Fairchld Data Corporation [Del]
     Fairchild Fasteners Corp.[Del]
     Fairchild Finance Company [Republic of Ireland]
     Fairchild Germany, Inc. [Del]
          Convac USA, Inc. [Del]
                Fairchild Technologies USA, Inc. [Calif]
     Mairoll, Inc. [Del]
     Simmonds Mecaero Fasteners, Inc.[DL]
     Meow, Inc. [Del]
          Fairchild Fasteners Europe--Simmonds S.A.R.L
               Simmonds S.A. [France]
               Eurosim Componentes Mecanicos de Seguranga, Lda.
               Mecaero S.A. [France]
               Transfix S.A. [France]
     Oink Oink, Inc. [Del.]
     VSI Holdings, Inc. [Del]
          Camloc Holdings Inc. [Del.]
          Fairchild Technologies Gmbh [Germany]
                Convac Dresden GmbH [Germany]
                     Convac France S.A. [France]
          Fairchild Fasteners Europe--Camloc GmbH [Germany] 
          Fairchild Fasteners France S.A.R.L. [France]
          Fairchild Fasteners Europe--VSD GmbH [West Germany]
          Fairchild Technologies UK Ltd. [U.K.]
Fairchild Scandinavian Bellyloading Company Aktiebolag
MTA, Inc. [Del]
Northking Insurance Company Limited [Bermuda]
Recycling Investments, Inc. [Del]
Recycling Investments II, Inc. [Del]
Scandinavian Bellyloading International, Inc. [CA]
Sovereign Air Limited [Del]
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 57 (Tuesday, March 25, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 14135]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-7416]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. CP97-193-000]

Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation; Notice of Site Visit

March 19, 1997.
    On April 2-3, 1997, beginning at 12:00 p.m., the Office of Pipeline 
Regulation (OPR) staff will conduct a site visit with Transcontinental 
Gas Pipe Line Corporation of the proposed Maiden Lateral Looping 
Project in Lincoln and Catawba Counties, North Carolina.
    All parties may attend. Those planning to attend must provide their 
own transportation.
    For further information, please contact Paul McKee at (202) 208-
1088.
Robert J. Cupina,
Deputy Director, Office of Pipeline Regulation.
[FR Doc. 97-7416 Filed 3-24-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
#### Bejarano v. State

112,370

07/22/2016

Denied.

Unpublished
# C_2022222EN.01001401.xml

| 7.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 222/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 222/14

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Stuttgart (Germany) lodged on 17 February 2022 — TAP Portugal v Myflyright GmbH

(Case C-158/22)

(2022/C 222/24)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landgericht Stuttgart

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: TAP Portugal

Respondent: Myflyright GmbH

Question referred

Is Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 (1) to be interpreted as meaning that an extraordinary circumstance within the meaning of that provision exists where a flight departing from an airport outside the base of the operating air carrier is cancelled because a crew member deployed on that flight (in casu the co-pilot), who has passed the prescribed regular medical examinations without restriction, dies suddenly and in a way that the air carrier is unable to foresee shortly before the flight or falls so seriously ill that he or she cannot perform the flight?

---

(1)  Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1).

---
A L D

- 0 2 6 NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________ No. 21

- 2789

___________ IN RE: CARLO AMATO ,

Petitioner

____________________________________ On a Pe tition for Writ of Mandamus from the United States D istrict Court for the District of New Jersey (Related to D.N.J. Civ. No. 3

- 19

- cv
- 19449 ) D i s t r i c t J u d g e : H o n o r a b l e M i c h a e l A

. S h i p p

____________________________________ Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fe d. R. App. P.

November 1 0 , 2 0 2 1 Before: J O R D A N , R E S T R E P O , a n d S C I R I C A , Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed : December 14, 2021 )

__ __ _ ___ _ _ OPINION *

__ __ _ ___ _ _ PER CURIAM
Carlo Amato petitions for a writ of mandamus directing the District Court to rule
on his motion to vacate, correct, or set aside his sentence under 28 U. S.C. § 2 255

. After
A mato filed this petition, the D istrict Court d enied the motion by order entered
November 30 , 202 1 . Thus, because A mato has received all the relief he requested, his

* This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not constitute binding precedent.2

petition is moot and we will dismiss it on that basis. See Blanciak v. Alleg heny Ludlum Corp. , 77 F.3d 690, 698

- 99 (3d C ir. 1996)

. Amato’s motion for a refund of his filing fees
is denied. See Porter v. Dep’t of Treasury , 564 F.3d 176, 179 (3d Cir. 2009) ( “ I t is of no consequence whether an appeal is voluntarily dismisse d, dismi ssed due to a jurisdictional defect, or dism issed on the merits

— appellants are not entitled to the return of their filing and docketing fees.” )

.
SERVED DECEMBER 9, 2010 

HEPARTMENT OF 

:!ANSPORTATION 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ''w<H OPERATIONS 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC /9iO 9EC ! 0 A lO^ 2 3 

IN THE MATTER OF 

THE MAGNI GROUP, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. CPIOSOOOIO 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS NO. FAA-2010-1080 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2010SO700313) has been 

assigned to Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and 

other communications regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA 

Hearing Docket, and the other persons on the attached Service List. 

Attachment - Service List 

Ronnie A 

Chief Administriftive Law Judge 
FAA Docket No. CPIOSOOOIO 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000^ 

ONE COPY 

Todd R. Palmer, General Manager 

Magni Industries, Inc., Respondent 

109250 Toebben Drive 

Independence Avenue, KY 41051 

TEL: 859-746-1777 

FAX: 859-746-1170 

Gerald A. Ellis, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel 

Southern Region, ASO-7 

federal Aviation Administration 

P.O. Box 20636 

Atlanta, GA 30320 

TEL: 404-305-5200 

FAX: 404-305-5223 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Legal Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: 

Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S. W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 

2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
Exhibit 32(b)


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350





I, Jeffrey R. Passmore, Chief Accounting Officer of Hallmark Financial Services, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify that the accompanying report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. I further certify that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:          May 10, 2011





/s/  Jeffrey R. PassmoreJeffrey R. Passmore,Chief Accounting Officer
[ARTICLE] 5
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   3-MOS
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          APR-30-2001
[PERIOD-END]                               JUL-31-2000
[CASH]                                               3
[SECURITIES]                                         0
[RECEIVABLES]                                        0
[ALLOWANCES]                                         0
[INVENTORY]                                          0
[CURRENT-ASSETS]                                     3
[PP&E]                                               0
[DEPRECIATION]                                       0
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                                       3
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]                             1000
[BONDS]                                              0
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                                0
[PREFERRED]                                          0
[COMMON]                                           168
[OTHER-SE]                                      (1165)
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]                         3
[SALES]                                              0
[TOTAL-REVENUES]                                     0
[CGS]                                                0
[TOTAL-COSTS]                                     1000
[OTHER-EXPENSES]                                     0
[LOSS-PROVISION]                                     0
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                                   0
[INCOME-PRETAX]                                      0
[INCOME-TAX]                                         0
[INCOME-CONTINUING]                                  0
[DISCONTINUED]                                       0
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                      0
[CHANGES]                                            0
[NET-INCOME]                                    (1000)
[EPS-BASIC]                                        0
[EPS-DILUTED]                                        0
</TABLE>
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Daniel Ray Heckler, * From the County Court

 of Howard County

Trial Court No. 66,772.

Vs. No. 11-16-00232-CR * February 21, 2019

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Wright, S.C.J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J., sitting

by assignment)

(Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there 

is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
# X3 - Vehicles per HH
combustionsurvey 

 

As a member of the business community in North Carolina, I would urge you to please continue your efforts to 

pass stricter MACT standards and implement on a short time frame. I do not agree with the NC chamber of 

Commerce opinion that this will hurt business. The health of our environment it too important to be pushed 

aside because businesses do not want to pay for upgrades and updates to their equipment. Please, stick to your 

schedule of implementation, and enforce this important change in Boiler MACT standards. 

Thank you, 

Courtney Lorenz 

From: "Lorenz, Courtney" <Courtney.Lorenz@skanska.com>

To: <combustionsurvey@erg.com>

Date: 7/6/2011 3:04 PM

Page 1 of 1

file://C:\Documents and Settings\GGibson\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4E147963DO... 8/2/2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF MEDICAL INCOME PROPERTIES 2B LIMITED PARTNERSHIP FOR THE
QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,190,207
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  232,272
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,328,541
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,395,824
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,776,189
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,619,635<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,395,824
<SALES>                                      1,769,453
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,774,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,907,079
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                27,120
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,886
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            130,399
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              2,233,811
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,364,210
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>REPRESENT TOTAL PARTNERSHIP CAPITAL INCLUDING NET INCOME NET OF
DISTRIBUTIONS.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.2
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
  In
connection with the Quarterly Report of International Automated Systems, Inc.
(the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal period ending December 31, 2007,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, LaGrand T. Johnson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:
  (1)
              the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 (2)
              the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.
 
 
 /s/ LaGrand T.
Johnson
 
 LaGrand
T. Johnson
 Chief
Financial Officer
 
 February
14, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           3,307
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,760
<ALLOWANCES>                                       235
<INVENTORY>                                        815
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,714
<PP&E>                                           2,236
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,271
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   9,816
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,698
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,116
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,816
<SALES>                                         11,923
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,923
<CGS>                                            7,010
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,010
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,401
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    512
<INCOME-TAX>                                       205
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                307
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       307
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .13
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 56 (Monday, March 24, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 13853]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-7321]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Parts 25, 26, 73, 76 and 100

[MM Docket No. 95-176; DA 97-568]


Closed Captioning of Video Programming

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of reply comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This Order extends the period for the public to file reply 
comments in this rulemaking from March 24, 1997 until March 31, 1997. 
This action will allow the public to more adequately reply to comments 
previously filed in response to the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 
(``NPRM'') seeking comment on proposed rules for the closed captioning 
of video programming.

DATES: Reply comments are now due on or before March 31, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC 20554.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marcia Glauberman, John Adams or 
Alexis Johns, Cable Services Bureau, (202) 418-7200, TTY (202) 418-
7172.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: By this Order, we extend the time period for 
filing reply comments in this docket until March 31, 1997. Section 305 
of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (``1996 Act'') added a new 
Section 713, Video Programming Accessibility, to the Communications Act 
of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''). Section 713 requires the 
Commission to prescribe, by August 8, 1997, rules and implementation 
schedules for the closed captioning of video programming. On January 9, 
1997, the Commission adopted a NPRM, summarized at 62 FR 4959 (February 
3, 1997), in this docket, seeking comment on proposed rules, 
implementation schedules and exemptions as authorized by Congress in 
Section 713. The NPRM established March 24, 1997, as the deadline for 
filing reply comments.
    This action is taken pursuant to authority found in Sections 4(i), 
303(r) and 713 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 
154(i), 303(r) and 613.

Federal Communications Commission
Meredith J. Jones,
Chief, Cable Services Bureau.
[FR Doc. 97-7321 Filed 3-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 308 

Recognizing and supporting the goals and ideals of National Runaway 

Prevention Month. 

THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 7, 2009 

Mr. SHELBY (for himself and Mrs. LINCOLN) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing and supporting the goals and ideals of National 

Runaway Prevention Month. 

Whereas the number of runaway and homeless youth in the 

United States is staggering, with studies suggesting that 

between 1,600,000 and 2,800,000 youth live on the 

streets each year; 

Whereas the problem of children who run away from home 

is widespread, as youth between 12 and 17 years of age 

are at a higher risk of homelessness than adults; 

Whereas runaway youth are often expelled from their homes 

by their families, discharged by State custodial systems 

without adequate transition plans, separated from their 

parents by death and divorce, or physically, sexually, and 

emotionally abused at home; 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 308 ATS 

Whereas runaway youth are often too poor to secure their 

own basic needs and are ineligible or unable to access 

adequate medical or mental health resources; 

Whereas effective programs that provide support to runaway 

youth and assist them in remaining at home with their 

families can succeed through partnerships created among 

families, community-based human service agencies, law 

enforcement agencies, schools, faith-based organizations, 

and businesses; 

Whereas preventing youth from running away from home and 

supporting youth in high-risk situations is a family, community, and national priority; 

Whereas the future of the Nation is dependent on providing 

opportunities for youth to acquire the knowledge, skills, 

and abilities necessary to develop into safe, healthy, and 

productive adults; 

Whereas the National Network for Youth and its members 

advocate on behalf of runaway and homeless youth and 

provide an array of community-based support to address 

their critical needs; 

Whereas the National Runaway Switchboard provides crisis 

intervention and referrals to reconnect runaway youth 

with their families and link youth to local resources that 

provide positive alternatives to running away from home; 

and 

Whereas during the month of November, the National Network for Youth and the National Runaway Switchboard 

are co-sponsoring National Runaway Prevention Month, 

in order to increase public awareness of the circumstances faced by youth in high-risk situations and to 

address the need to provide resources and support for 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 308 ATS 

safe, healthy, and productive alternatives for at-risk 

youth, their families, and their communities: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate recognizes and supports 

2 the goals and ideals of National Runaway Prevention 

3 Month. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS