Name: John M. McManus

Title: Vice President- Environmental Service Company: American Electric Power Sign Date: 6/30/2010 Name: Scott W. Banach Title: Director, Project Engineering Company: Platt Environmental Services, Inc. Sign Date: 6/28/2010 Permitted Facility Representative / Date Testing Company Representative / Date 

### Conesville 4 Final Test Report for

/ / Based on information and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, I certify that the statements and information in this test report are true, accurate, and complete. I have reviewed all testing details and results in this test report and hereby certify that the test report is authentic and accurate.

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 1 of 24Conesville 4

6/30/2010 Facility Information:

Conesville Plant

47201 CR 273

Conesville OH 43811
Contact: Paul Jackson

Phone: 614-716-3278

Fax: 614-716-1252

Email: pmjackson@aep.com Testing Company:
Platt Environmental Services, Inc. 1520 Kensington Road

Suite 204

Oak Brook IL 60523
Contact: Scott Banach

Phone: 630-521-9400

Fax: 630-521-9494

Email: sbanach@plattenv.com

Air Permit Number:
06-16-00-0000 Permitted Source ID/Name:
Unit 4 Unit 4

Permitted Maximum Process Rate:
N/A Max. Normal Operation Process Rate:
N/A Target Process Test Rate
N/A

Description of the source (including control equipment). Please see the attachments for source or process flow diagram:

The following describes any modifications and/or deviations to the applicable test methods. If alternative methods were requested, see the attachments for documentation of request AND approval, including dates. Industry/SCC/NAIS 221112

Sampling Location Information:

Test Parameter Information: AFS #: FRS #:

SCC / Description 10100202 External Combustion Boilers - Electric Generation - Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal - Pulverized Coal: Dry Bottom (Bituminous Coal)

The following state and federal regulations that apply to the proposed testing:

Location Round

Duct Diam. Distance from upstream dist. Distance from

downstream dist. Number of

Traverse Ports Equiv. Diam Min.Travers Points Rect. Duct Length /Width
Stack 392 196 784 4 0 6 0 0

Target Parameter Test Method Number of

Test Runs Test Run

Duration Sample

Points Comments Location Hydrogen Fluoride Method 26A 3 0 Stack Hydrogen Chloride Method 26A 3 0 Stack O2 Method 3A O2 3 0 Stack Co2 Method 3A CO2 3 0 Stack

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 2 of 24Conesville 4

6/30/2010

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 3 of 24Conesville 4

6/30/2010 Sampling / Stack Data Results Summary

Location Stack - Method 26A Average
Run Number M26A-1 M26A-2 M26A-3

Test Date 4/27/2010 4/27/2010 4/27/2010

Run Start Time 8:15:00 AM 11:35:00 AM 2:50:00 PM

Run Finish Time 11:27:00 AM 2:41:00 PM 5:56:00 PM
Net Run Time, minutes 180 180 180 Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 128.920 128.394 127.557 128.290
Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 14.26 14.42 13.99 14.223 Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % 14.64 14.92 14.75 14.770
Carbon Dioxide, % 11.9 11.9 13.4 12.400 Oxygen, % 6.7 6.7 6.3 6.567 Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 127.47 128.17 127.75 127.797 Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 2,018,185.9 1,983,359.0 1,988,009.8 1,996,518.23 3
Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 2,717,981.0 2,679,260.5 2,670,208.9 2,689,150.13 3 Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 101.3 102.7 101.8 101.933
F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9780 9780 9780 9,780.000

Fw 10640 10640 10640 10,640.000

Fc 1800 1800 1800 1,800.000

Location Stack - Method 3A CO2 Average
Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time
Carbon Dioxide, % Oxygen, % Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm
F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2
Moisture, % Fuel Type

Fw

Fc

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 4 of 24Conesville 4

6/30/2010

Location Stack - Method 3A O2 Average
Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time
Carbon Dioxide, % Oxygen, % Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm
F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2
Moisture, % Fuel Type

Fw

Fc

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 5 of 24Conesville 4

6/30/2010 Emissions Summary

Process Run Data Location: Stack - Method 26A Compound: Hydrogen Chloride Average RunNumber M26A-1 M26A-2 M26A-3 Mass_mg 0.63 0.59 0.78 0.667 lb/mmBtuO2 1.55E-04 1.46E-04 1.89E-04 0.000

Compound: Hydrogen Fluoride Average RunNumber M26A-1 M26A-2 M26A-3 Mass_mg 0.2 0.26 0.34 0.267 lb/mmBtuO2 4.92E-05 6.43E-05 8.23E-05 0.000

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 6 of 24Conesville 4

6/30/2010
Process Run Data

Run Name Value UOM Comments Target Value
1 Bituminous Coal Burned 318 klb/hr The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 400

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 7 of 24Conesville 4

6/30/2010

1 Gross Load 833 MW The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 830

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 8 of 24Conesville 4

6/30/2010

1 Main Steam Pressure 1597.4 psig The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 1600

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 9 of 24Conesville 4

6/30/2010

1 Main Steam Temperature 455.9 F The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 500

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 10 of 24Conesville 4

6/30/2010

1 Excess Air 1.9 % The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 2

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 11 of 24Conesville 4

6/30/2010

2 Bituminous Coal Burned 318 klb/hr The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 400

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 12 of 24Conesville 4

6/30/2010

2 Gross Load 833 MW The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 830

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 13 of 24Conesville 4

6/30/2010

2 Main Steam Pressure 1597.4 psig The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 1600

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 14 of 24Conesville 4

6/30/2010

2 Main Steam Temperature 455.9 F The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 500

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 15 of 24Conesville 4

6/30/2010

2 Excess Air 1.9 % The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 2

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 16 of 24Conesville 4

6/30/2010

3 Bituminous Coal Burned 318 klb/hr The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 400

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 17 of 24Conesville 4

6/30/2010

3 Gross Load 833 MW The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 830

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 18 of 24Conesville 4

6/30/2010

3 Main Steam Pressure 1597.4 psig The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 1600

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 19 of 24Conesville 4

6/30/2010

3 Main Steam Temperature 455.9 F The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 500

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 20 of 24Conesville 4

6/30/2010

APCD Run Data

Process Lab Run Data 3 Excess Air 1.9 % The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 2

Run Name Value UOM Comments Target Value
1 ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR - HIGH EFFICIENCY 25.4 % 20

2 ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR - HIGH EFFICIENCY 25.4 % 20

3 ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR - HIGH EFFICIENCY 25.4 % 20

1 SCR (SELECTIVE CATALYTIC REDUCTION) 5.8 ppm 20

2 SCR (SELECTIVE CATALYTIC REDUCTION) 5.8 ppm 20

3 SCR (SELECTIVE CATALYTIC REDUCTION) 5.8 ppm 20

1 SCRUBBER 28 ppm 65

2 SCRUBBER 28 ppm 65

3 SCRUBBER 28 ppm 65

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 21 of 24Conesville 4

6/30/2010

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 22 of 24Conesville 4

6/30/2010
Sampling / Stack Data Results Detail

Location Stack - Method 26A Average Run Number M26A-1 M26A-2 M26A-3
Test Date 4/27/2010 4/27/2010 4/27/2010 Run Start Time 8:15:00 AM 11:35:00 AM 2:50:00 PM Run Finish Time 11:27:00 AM 2:41:00 PM 5:56:00 PM Net Traversing Points 40 40 40 Net Run Time, minutes 180 180 180 Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.232 0.232 0.232 0.232 Pitot Tube Coefficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.840 Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 0.984 0.984 0.984 0.984 Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 28.9 28.9 28.9 28.900 Average Orifice Meter Differential, inches H2O 1.49 1.45 1.45 1.463 Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 140.175 139.541 138.823 139.513 Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 87.72 87.42 88.18 87.773 Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 128.920 128.394 127.557 128.290 Total Moisture Liquid collected, g 455.5 459.6 440.6 451.900 Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 21.44 21.63 20.74 21.270 Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 14.26 14.42 13.99 14.223 Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % 14.64 14.92 14.75 14.770 Dry Mole Fraction 0.8574 0.8558 0.8601 0.858 Carbon Dioxide, % 11.9 11.9 13.4 12.400 Oxygen, % 6.7 6.7 6.3 6.567 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 81.4 81.4 80.3 81.033 Fuel Factor 1.19 1.19 1.09 Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 30.17 30.17 30.40 30.247 Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.43 28.42 28.67 28.507 Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O -1 -1 -1 -1.000 Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 28.83 28.83 28.83 28.830 Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 127.47 128.17 127.75 127.797 Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 0.7903596545 81531 0.766919468

563666 0.768839884

651383 0.775

Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 54.05 53.28 53.10 53.477 Stack Cross-Sectional Area, square feet 838.107 838.107 838.107 838.107 Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 2,018,185.9 1,983,359.0 1,988,009.8 1,996,518.2 33 Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 2,717,981.0 2,679,260.5 2,670,208.9 2,689,150.1 33 Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 101.3 102.7 101.8 101.933 Percent Excess Air, % 45.3 45.3 42.3 44.300 F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9780 9780 9780 9,780.000 Round Duct Diameter, inches 392 392 392 Rectangular Duct Width, inches 0 0 0 Rectangular Duct Length, inches 0 0 0
Fw 10640 10640 10640 10,640.000
Fc 1800 1800 1800 1,800.000

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 23 of 24Conesville 4

6/30/2010

Location Stack - Method 3A CO2 Average Run Number
Test Date Run Start Time Run Finish Time Carbon Dioxide, % Oxygen, % Fuel Factor Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 Moisture, % Analyzer Make Analyzer Model Analyzer Serial Number Operating Range Operating Units No. Readings/Avg. Calibration Set Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift Calibration Post High Cylinder ID Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift Cavg Cavg Units Cgas Cgas Units Fuel Type
Fw
Fc Cgasw Cgasw Units

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 24 of 24Conesville 4

6/30/2010

Location Stack - Method 3A O2 Average Run Number
Test Date Run Start Time Run Finish Time Carbon Dioxide, % Oxygen, % Fuel Factor Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 Moisture, % Analyzer Make Analyzer Model Analyzer Serial Number Operating Range Operating Units No. Readings/Avg. Calibration Set Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift Calibration Post High Cylinder ID Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift Cavg Cavg Units Cgas Cgas Units Fuel Type
Fw
Fc Cgasw Cgasw Units

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 25 of 24