alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.0



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Whiteford  Partners,  L.P.,  (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  each
of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Sec. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  in his capacity as an
officer of the Company, that to his knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


Date: November 10, 2005                      By:      /s/Kevin T. Gannon
      -----------------                          -----------------------------
                                                         Kevin T. Gannon
                                                 Chairman of Gannon Group, Inc.
                                                 General Partner of the Company




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the general partner and will be
retained by the general partner and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q and shall not be considered filed as
part of the Form 10-Q.



                                    12 of 12
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 54 (Thursday, March 20, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 13400]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-7072]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice (97-030)]


Notice of Prospective Patent License

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of prospective patent license.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NASA hereby gives notice that Howard Industries, Inc., of 1840 
Progress Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43207, has applied for an exclusive 
patent license to practice the invention described and claimed in U.S. 
Patent No. 5,373,110, entitled ``Ion Exchange Polymer and Method of 
Making,'' which is assigned to the United States of America as 
represented by the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration. Written objections to the prospective grant of a 
license should be sent to the NASA Lewis Research Center.

DATES: Responses to this notice must be received by May 19, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kent N. Stone, Patent Attorney, NASA Lewis Research Center, 21000 
Brookpart Road, Cleveland, Ohio 44135, telephone (216) 433-8855.

    Dated: March 14, 1997.
Edward A. Frankle,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 97-7072 Filed 3-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> BD
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       6,839,018
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,711,859
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                  0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                                0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                                  0
<PP&E>                                       7,367,565
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              24,619,609
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<PAYABLES>                                  12,305,931
<REPOS-SOLD>                                         0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                                  0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                                   0
<LONG-TERM>                                  4,462,167
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,500,402
<COMMON>                                       271,167
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,079,942
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                24,619,609
<TRADING-REVENUE>                                    0
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                           326,916
<COMMISSIONS>                               41,523,907
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                        0
<FEE-REVENUE>                                7,508,518
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             112,209
<COMPENSATION>                               8,405,381
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,468,542
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,468,542
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   866,718
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.14
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements on Form 
S-3 (Nos. 33-53113, 33-12340, 33-13373 and 33-17536); Form S-8 (Nos. 2-75423, 
2-83877, 33-14382, 33-29351, 33-32839, 33-56529, and 33-65447); and Form S-16 
(Nos. 2-76538 and 2-76656) of Rohr, Inc., of our report dated September 11, 
1997, appearing and incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
of Rohr, Inc., for the year ended July 31, 1997.


Deloitte & Touche L L P

San Diego, California
October 28, 1997
#### Golden Rule Ins. Co. v. Tomlinson

105,245

05/20/13

Granted.

47 Kan. App. 2d 408
#### State v. Jones

111,028

112,031

06/21/2016

Denied.

Unpubhshed
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,129,806
<SECURITIES>                                 6,395,419
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,501,953
<ALLOWANCES>                                   479,000
<INVENTORY>                                  5,652,494
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,544,015
<PP&E>                                      15,141,026
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,884,702
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              30,509,784
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,441,556
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        22,809
<OTHER-SE>                                  26,913,995
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                30,509,784
<SALES>                                      5,282,462
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,442,870
<CGS>                                        3,431,767
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,356,797
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (248,432)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                902,738
<INCOME-TAX>                                   330,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            572,738
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   572,738
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .13


</TABLE>
No. 12-5751.

#### Tindall *v.*Freightquote.com, Inc.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
================================================================================

Exhibit 32.1

          CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
                     OFFICER OF SPARTA SURGICAL CORPORATION
               FORM 10-QSB FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MAY 31, 2005
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES -OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I am the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Sparta Surgical
Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company". I am delivering this
certificate in connection with the Form 10-QSB of the Company for the three
months ended May 31, 2005 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
("Form 10-QSB").

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
the Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respect, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: June 29,2006                             /s/ Allan J. Korn
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Allan J. Korn
                                               Chief Executive Officer
                                               Chief Financial Officer






















--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 331 

Congratulating the United States Military Academy at West Point on being 

named by Forbes magazine as America’s Best College for 2009. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 2, 2009 

Mr. SCHUMER (for himself and Mrs. GILLIBRAND) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating the United States Military Academy at West 

Point on being named by Forbes magazine as America’s 

Best College for 2009. 

Whereas Forbes magazine has named the United States Military Academy at West Point as America’s Best College 

for 2009; 

Whereas the United States has had a military presence at 

West Point since the Revolutionary War because of its 

strategic position overlooking the Hudson River; 

Whereas General George Washington selected Thaddeus 

Kosciuszko to design West Point’s fortifications in 1778; 

Whereas West Point is the oldest continuously occupied military post in the United States; 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 331 ATS 

Whereas President Thomas Jefferson established the United 

States Military Academy at West Point in 1802; 

Whereas West Point has educated many of the United States 

Army’s commissioned officers; 

Whereas West Point instructs 4,400 cadets per year in academics, military tactics, physical fitness, and leadership; 

Whereas approximately 1,000 cadets graduate each year and 

are commissioned in the United States Armed Services; 

Whereas 2 Presidents of the United States, 74 Congressional 

Medal of Honor recipients, 88 Rhodes Scholars, 33 Marshall Scholars, and 28 Truman Scholars have graduated 

from West Point; 

Whereas in addition to academics and military training, West 

Point offers extracurricular activities that include the Eisenhower Hall Theatre and 115 athletic and non-sport 

clubs; and 

Whereas West Point offers a well-rounded, highly regarded 

education to the next generation of the Nation’s leaders: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) congratulates the United States Military 

3 Academy at West Point on being named by Forbes 

4 magazine as America’s Best College for 2009; 

5 (2) supports West Point’s mission ‘‘to educate, 

6 train, and inspire the Corps of Cadets so that each 

7 graduate is a commissioned leader of character com8 mitted to the values of Duty, Honor, Country and 

9 prepared for a career of professional excellence and 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 331 ATS 

1 service to the Nation as an officer in the United 

2 States Army’’; and 

3 (3) respectfully requests the Secretary of the 

4 Senate to transmit a copy of this resolution to the 

5 Superintendent of West Point. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 67 (Tuesday, April 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 16890]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-8866]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Customs Service
[T.D. 97-20]


Tuna Fish--Tariff-Rate Quota; The Tariff-Rate Quota for Calendar 
Year 1997, on Tuna Classifiable Under Subheading 1604.14.20, Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)

AGENCY: U.S. Customs Service, Department of the Treasury.

ACTION: Announcement of the quota quantity for tuna for Calendar Year 
1997.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Each year the tariff-rate quota for tuna fish described in 
subheading 1604.14.20, HTSUS, is based on the United States canned tuna 
production for the preceding calendar year.

EFFECTIVE DATES: The 1997 tariff-rate quota is applicable to tuna fish 
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption during the period 
January 1 through December 31, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cynthia Porter, Supervisor, Quota, 
Import Operations, Trade Compliance Division, Office of Field 
Operations, U.S. Customs Service, Washington, D.C. 20229, (202) 927-
5399. It has now been determined that 35,662,163 kilograms of tuna may 
be entered for consumption or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption 
during the Calendar Year 1997, at the rate of 6 percent ad valorem 
under subheading 1604.14.20, HTSUS. Any such tuna which is entered, or 
withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption during the current calendar 
year in excess of this quota will be dutiable at the rate of 12.5 
percent ad valorem under subheading 1604.14.30 HTSUS.

(OFO-TC:T:Q).

    Dated: March 18, 1997.
George J. Weise,
Commissioner.
[FR Doc. 97-8866 Filed 4-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4820-02-P
No. 12-5434.

#### Lopez *v.*California.

Ct. App. Cal., 4th App. Dist., Div. 3.

Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 53 (Wednesday, March 19, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 12997]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6866]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Project No. 11478-000-VT]


Central Vermont Public Service Corporation; Notice of 
Availability of Environmental Assessment

March 13, 1997.
    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission's) 
regulations, 18 CFR Part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 F.R. 47897), the Office 
of Hydropower Licensing has reviewed the Central Vermont Public Service 
Corporation's application for an original license to continue operating 
the existing, unlicensed Silver Lake Hydropower Project, located on 
Sucker Brook in Addison County, Vermont. Subsequently, the Commission's 
staff prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA).
    In the EA, staff evaluates the potential environmental impacts that 
would result from the continued operation of the project. Staff 
concludes that licensing the project with appropriate enhancement 
measures would not constitute a major federal action significantly 
affecting the quality of the human environment.
    Copies of the EA are available for review in the Public Reference 
and Files Maintenance Branch, Room 2A, of the Commission's offices at 
888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    For further information, please contact Jim Haimes, Environmental 
Coordinator, at (202) 219-2780.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-6866 Filed 3-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
ACCEPTED 01-15-00013-CR FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS 8/6/2015 8:44:43 AM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of AEI Real Estate  Fund
XVII Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the
period  ended  June  30, 2010, as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on  the  date hereof  (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned, Robert P. Johnson, President of AEI Fund  Management
XVII, Inc., the Managing General Partner of the Partnership,  and
Patrick  W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer of AEI Fund Management
XVII,  Inc., each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Partnership.


                          /s/ ROBERT P JOHNSON
                              Robert P. Johnson, President
                              AEI Fund Management XVII, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              August 11, 2010



                          /s/ PATRICK W KEENE
                              Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer
                              AEI Fund Management XVII, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              August 11, 2010
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular

cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes

needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal

profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the Court has determined

that this opinion should not be published. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 95-10092

Summary Calendar

CREDIT COUNSELING CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR CONSUMER CREDIT, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Northern District of Texas

(3:94 CV 01855)

( July 10, 1995 )

Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, WIENER and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

This is a civil action between two companies that provide

consumers with debt management services. Plaintiffcounterdefendant Credit Counseling Centers of America ("CCCA") sued2

to obtain a declaratory judgment that defendant-counterplaintiff

National Foundation for Consumer Credit, Inc.'s ("NFCC's") licensed

name, CONSUMER CREDIT COUNSELING SERVICE , is a generic expression

and hence unprotectable. The Defendant-counterplaintiff NFCC

counter claimed on theories of federal tr ademark infringement,

federal unfair competition, false representation, and false

designation of origin and a Texas law claim for injury to business

reputation and trade name, and moved for a preliminary injunction

to requ ire CCCA to modify pending advertising, prevent further

advertising, and refrain from using the term "Consumer Credit

Counseling" just prior to CCCA's name, "Credit Counseling Centers

of America."

The court below issued a preliminary injunction after having

entered a memorandum opinion dated November 29, 1994. Said

memorandum opinion and preliminary injunction are attached herewith

as Appendix "A."

On the basis of the memorandum opinion, we affirm the issuing

of the preliminary injunction in the above case.

The plaintiff- appellants ask us to dissolve the preliminary

injunction issued by the trial court and remand the case for

further proceedings.

They tell us that the term "Consumer Credit Counselling" is a

generic term and it is not protectable and they tell us that even

if this term is found to be protectable, appellee still has

the right to use the term under the fair use defense under the

Lanham Trademark Act and that the appellant has not had the3

opportunity to put forward this defense. The record does not show

that they offered this defens e before the preliminary injunction

was issued.

What we have before us is a preliminary injunction and is

interlocutory, of course, and does not prevent the trier of fact

from making other findings at a trial on the merits.

The appellant must seek a hearing on the merits in which they

may be able to convince the trier of fact that in truth and in fact

what is being argued about is a generic term and not protectable,

and if it is protectable, that they have a right to use it under

the fair use defense of the Landham Act.

The preliminary injunction as issued by the court b elow is

therefore AFFIRMED.
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-14-00034-CR

BRIAN WILLIAMS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 5th District Court

Bowie County, Texas

Trial Court No. 11F0303-5

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Brian Williams has filed notices of appeal in connection with rulings in multiple 

prosecutions in which he is the defendant. In each instance, he is complaining about the denial 

of relief on pretrial motions filed in his pending prosecution. 

As a general rule, an appellate court may consider appeals by criminal defendants only 

after conviction. See Ex parte Shumake, 953 S.W.2d 842, 844 (Tex. App.—Austin 1997, no 

pet.). It is axiomatic that a party may appeal only that which the Legislature has authorized. 

Olowosuko v. State, 826 S.W.2d 940, 941 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992). Intermediate appellate courts 

have no jurisdiction to review interlocutory orders absent express authority. TEX. R. APP. P. 

25.2(b)(2); Ex parte Apolinar v. State, 820 S.W.2d 792, 794 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Sanchez v. 

State, 340 S.W.3d 848, 849 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2011, no pet.). Upon receiving his notice 

of appeal, we sent Williams a letter telling him that we found no order or judgment in the record 

that was appealable and asked him to show this Court how we had jurisdiction over each appeal. 

We have received a response in which Williams directs us to Rule 25.2(a)(2)(A) of the Texas 

Rules of Appellate Procedure as permitting his appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P 25.2 (a)(2)(A). That 

section of the Rule provides that if a plea agreement is granted, a defendant may appeal certain 

types of matters raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial. 

In that limited situation, such an appeal for certain types of pretrial determinations may 

be brought from a conviction pursuant to a plea agreement. The Rule provides an exception to 

the limitation on appeals from convictions pursuant to a plea agreement, and it does not allow 

separate, interlocutory appeals from any pretrial rulings by the trial court. 
3

The Rule provides no relief for Williams. Our review of the appellate record reveals no 

appealable orders. We, therefore, must dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

We dismiss the appeal. 

Bailey C. Moseley

Justice

Date Submitted: April 3, 2014

Date Decided: April 4, 2014

Do Not Publish