alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

Calendar No. 80 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 182 

Recognizing the democratic accomplishments of the people of Albania and 

expressing the hope that the parliamentary elections on June 28, 2009, 

maintain and improve the transparency and fairness of democracy in 

Albania. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 10, 2009 

Mr. KERRY (for himself, Mr. LUGAR, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Mr. CARDIN, Mr. 

LIEBERMAN, and Mr. DEMINT) submitted the following resolution; which 

was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

JUNE 16, 2009 

Reported by Mr. KERRY without amendment 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the democratic accomplishments of the people 

of Albania and expressing the hope that the parliamentary elections on June 28, 2009, maintain and improve 

the transparency and fairness of democracy in Albania. 

Whereas the people of Albania have made extraordinary 

progress from authoritarian government and a closed 

market to a democratic government and market economy 

in less than two decades; 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

SRES 182 RS 

Whereas the Republic of Albania, with the advice and consent 

of this Senate and the governments of the other member 

countries, was officially admitted to full membership in 

the North Atlantic Treaty Organization on April 2, 2009; 

Whereas the Thessaloniki Declaration of 2003 confirmed that 

the countries of the Western Balkans are eligible for accession to the European Union once they have fulfilled 

the requirements for membership; and 

Whereas the Government of Albania has accepted numerous 

specific commitments governing the conduct of elections 

as a participating state in the Organization for Security 

and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE): Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) urges the Government of Albania to fulfill 

3 the commitments it has made to the OSCE with re4 spect to the conduct of its upcoming elections, and 

5 to ensure that those elections are free and fair; 

6 (2) urges the Government of Albania to expe7 dite the implementation of its voter identification 

8 card program to minimize the possibility of dis9 enfranchisement and provide as many cards as pos10 sible to eligible voters prior to the election; 

11 (3) commends the positive step taken by the 

12 Government of Albania to reduce the cost of the 

13 voter ID card significantly and avoid charges of a 

14 poll tax; and 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

SRES 182 RS 

1 (4) expresses its hope that credible democratic 

2 elections in Albania will contribute to a strong and 

3 stable government responsive to the wishes of the 

4 people of Albania and strengthen Albania’s standing 

5 within NATO and European institutions. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
Calendar No. 80 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 182 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the democratic accomplishments of the 

ness of democracy in Albania. maintain and improve the transparency and fairthe parliamentary elections on June 28, 2009, people of Albania and expressing the hope that 

JUNE 16, 2009 

Reported without amendment 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
S95Y1726

#### IN THE MATTER OF JOHN HERBERT PATTESON, JR.

(461 SE2d 875)

Decided September 18, 1995.

*William P. Smith III, General Counsel State Bar, E. Duane Cooper, Assistant General Counsel State Bar,*for State Bar of Georgia.

*Morris, Manning & Martin, George E. Hibbs,*for Patteson.

Per curiam.

In December 1992, this Court accepted John Herbert Patteson, Jr.’s petition for voluntary discipline, suspending him from the practice of law in this State for 30 months with conditions. *In the Matter of John H. Patteson, Jr.,*262 Ga. 591 (423 SE2d 248) (1992). Patteson now petitions this Court to lift his suspension, to which the State Bar consents. It appearing that Patteson has completed 30 months suspension and has satisfied all conditions imposed by this Court, we agree with the State Bar that Patteson’s suspension should be lifted. Accordingly, the December 1992 suspension imposed by this Court is hereby lifted.

*Reinstated.*

*All the Justices concur.*
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gen-Probe Incorporated (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2004 (the
"Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the
date hereof, I, Henry L. Nordhoff, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge,
that:

      (i)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and
            Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
            and

      (ii)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Report and
            results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the
            Report.


DATE: August 9, 2004                By: /s/ Henry L. Nordhoff
                                        -----------------------------------
                                        Henry L. Nordhoff
                                        Chairman, President and Chief
                                        Executive Officer

This certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject
to the liability of Section 18 of the Exchange Act. Such certification shall not
be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities
Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company
specifically incorporates it by reference.
This memorandum opinion was not selected for pub lication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 1 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 2 Plaintiff-Appellee, 3
v. NO. 33,334 4 JOSEPH DOMINGUEZ, 5 Defendant-Appellant. 6 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SAN MIGUEL COUNTY 7 Matthew J. Sandoval, District Judge 8 Gary K. King, Attorney General 9 Margaret McLean, Assistant Attorney General 10 Santa Fe, NM 11 for Appellee 12 Bregman & Loman, P.C. 13 Eric Loman 14 Sam Bregman 15 Albuquerque, NM 16 for Appellant 172 MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 KENNEDY, Chief Judge. 2 {1} Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 3 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has 4 been filed, and the time for doing so has expired. 5 {2} DISMISSED. 6 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED. 7

___________ _________________________ 8 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Chief Judge 9 WE CONCUR: 10

_________________________________ 11 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge 12

_________________________________ 13 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge 14
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
registrant's financial statements contained in its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the period ended September 30, 1995 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                           1,770
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  124,675
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               126,445
<PP&E>                                      14,007,344
<DEPRECIATION>                              10,669,883
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,337,461
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,463,906
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,729,119
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,463,906
<SALES>                                        587,732
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               597,313
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,113,758<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              37,167
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (631,663)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (631,663)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (631,663)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Includes lease operating expense, production taxes, and depreciation,
depletion and amortization expense.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
S95A0269.

S95A0695.

#### RILEY v. THE STATE. CARRUTHERS v. THE STATE.

(456 SE2d 507)

Hunstein, Justice.

Anthony Riley was convicted of malice murder and Christopher Carruthers was convicted of felony murder in the shooting death of *393Richard Hayes. Riley and Carruthers were also convicted of aggravated assault on four other victims. They were given a life sentence for the murder and four consecutive twenty-year sentences for the assaults. They appeal and we affirm in this consolidated opinion.1

Decided May 8, 1995.

*Lawrence W. Daniel,*for appellant (case no. S95A0269).

*Hurl R. Taylor, Jr.,*for appellant (case no. S95A0695).

*Lewis R. Slaton, District Attorney, Vivian D. Hoard, Samuel W. Lengen, John M. Turner, Jr., Carl P. Greenberg, Assistant District Attorneys, Michael J. Bowers, Attorney General,*for appellee.

1. Viewed to support the verdict, the evidence at trial established that following an argument with an employee of the Cheetah III lounge, Riley and Carruthers discharged automatic weapons at the club and its patrons as they drove out of the parking lot. Richard Hayes died as a result of the shooting and four others suffered injuries. The evidence adduced was sufficient to enable a rational trier of fact to find Riley and Carruthers guilty of the crimes charged beyond a reasonable doubt. *Jackson v. Virginia,*443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979).

2. We have carefully reviewed appellants’ remaining enumerations of error and have found them to be without merit.2

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

1

 The murder and assaults occurred on March 22, 1992. Riley and Carruthers were indicted in Fulton County on August 11,1992. On October 23,1992, following a jury trial, Riley was found guilty of malice murder, felony murder and five aggravated assaults. Carruthers was found guilty of felony murder and five aggravated assaults. Both were sentenced on December 4, 1992.

Riley’s motion for new trial, filed on December 16, 1992 and amended on March 24, 1994, was denied on September 5, 1994. Riley’s notice of appeal was filed on September 20, 1994 and the appeal was docketed in this Court on October 13, 1994. It was submitted for decision without oral argument on January 18, 1995.

Carruthers’ motion for new trial was filed on December 9, 1992 and denied on September 15, 1994. Carruthers’ notice of appeal was filed on September 15, 1994 and the appeal was docketed in this Court on January 24, 1995. Oral arguments were heard on April 10, 1995.

2

 Riley complains about an unredacted indictment and also contends that the trial court erred in its instructions to the jury concerning OCGA §§ 16-5-20 and 16-2-20. Carruthers contends that the trial court violated OCGA § 17-8-57; that the trial court erred by allowing the prosecutor to supplement jury instructions; that the State’s ballistics expert was erroneously allowed to give an opinion concerning the ultimate issue in the case; and that bullet fragments were erroneously admitted into evidence.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 64 (Thursday, April 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 15882]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-8469]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Pacific Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

[Docket No. RP97-299-000]
March 28, 1997.
    Take notice that on March 26, 1997, Pacific Gas Transmission 
Company (PGT) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First 
Revised Volume No. 1-A: Second Revised Sheet Nos. 37 through 39 and 
First Revised Sheet No. 40. PGT requested the above-referenced tariff 
sheets become effective April 26, 1997.
    PGT asserts that the purpose of this filing is to modify the 
methodology used for allocating capacity in its parking and lending 
services (Rate Schedules PS-1 and AIS-1, respectively) from a first-
come, first-served methodology to an economic dispatch methodology, 
with pro-rata allocation as a tie-breaker.
    PGT further states that a copy of this filing has been served on 
PGT's jurisdictional customers and interested state regulatory 
agencies.
    Any person desiring to be heard or protest said filing should file 
a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission, Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 
and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure. All 
such motions or protests must be filed as provided in Section 154.210 
of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person 
wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of 
this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for 
public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-8469 Filed 4-2-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# m94_46
Opinion filed September 12, 2019



### In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

__________ No. 11

- 18

- 00353

- CV

__________ AMANDA MARIE COCI AN D HEART OF TEXAS EMS , INC., D/B/A HEART OF TEXAS EMS , Appellant s
V.
APRIL DOWER , Appellee

On Appeal from the 35th District Court Brown County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CV1801020

D I S S E N T I N G O P I N I O N Because I believe this personal injury lawsuit involves a health care liability
claim , I respectfully dissent from the majority’s opinion. The majority affirms the trial court’s denial of a motion to dismiss based on the plaintiff’s failure to file an expert report under the T exas M edical L iability A ct (TMLA) . I would reverse. The plaintiff alleged that she was injured while a passenger in an ambulance
that was involved in a single

- vehicle accident . The plaintiff was accompanying her2 minor daughter , who was being transported by ambulance from one medical facility
to another . U nder the TMLA, a health care liability claim includes a cause of action against a health care provider for a “departure from accepted standards of . . . safety or professional or administrative services directly related to health care.” T EX

. C IV

. P RAC

. & R EM

. C ODE A NN

. § 74.001(a)(13) (West 2017 )

. When the accepted standards of “safety” are at issue, the alleged departure need not actually be “directly
related” to health care ; there need only be “a substantive nexus ” between the safety standards allegedly violated and the provision of health care

. Ross v. St. Lu ke’s Episcopal Hosp. , 462 S.W.3d 496, 50 4 (Tex. 2015).
I would hold that there is a substantive nexus to the provision of health care when a patient or a passenger escorting that patient is injur ed while being transported
in an ambulance to a medical facility. See Bain v. Capital Senior Living Corp. , No. 05

- 14

- 00255

- CV, 2015 WL 3958714 , at *1

– 4 (Tex. App.

— Dallas June 30, 2015, pet. denied) (mem. op.) ; see also Sherman v. HealthSouth Specialty Hosp.,
Inc. , 397 S.W.3d 869, 872

– 7 4 (Tex. App.

— Dallas 2013, pet. denied)

. I respectfully disagree with the majority’s analysis in this regard and with the case upon which the majority relies: City of Houston v. Hussein , No. 01

- 18

- 00683

- CV, 2019 WL 1246417, at * 8 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] Mar. 19, 2019, no pet. h. )

.

KEITH STRETCHER September 12, 2019 JUSTICE
Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J. , Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J. 1
Willson, J., not participating.

1 Jim R. Wright, Senior Chief Justice (Retired), Court of Appeals, 11th District of Texas at Eastland, sitting by assignment.
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 338 

Designating November 14, 2009, as ‘‘National Reading Education Assistance 

Dogs Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 5, 2009 

Mr. HATCH (for himself, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mrs. MCCASKILL, Mr. COCHRAN, 

and Mr. RISCH) submitted the following resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

NOVEMBER 16, 2009 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating November 14, 2009, as ‘‘National Reading 

Education Assistance Dogs Day’’. 

Whereas reading provides children with an essential foundation for all future learning; 

Whereas the Reading Education Assistance Dogs (R.E.A.D.) 

program was founded in November of 1999 to improve 

the literacy skills of children through the mentoring assistance of trained, registered, and insured pet partner 

reading volunteer teams; 

Whereas children who participate in the R.E.A.D. program 

make significant improvements in fluency, comprehenVerDate Nov 24 2008 00:48 Nov 17, 2009 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\SR338.ATS SR338

rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 338 ATS 

sion, confidence, and many additional academic and social dimensions; 

Whereas the R.E.A.D. program now has an active presence 

in 49 States, 3 provinces in Canada, Europe, Asia, and 

beyond with more than 2,400 trained and registered volunteer teams participating and influencing thousands of 

children in classrooms and libraries across the Nation; 

Whereas the program has received awards and recognition 

from distinguished entities including the International 

Reading Association, the Delta Society, the Latham 

Foundation, the American Library Association, and PBS 

Television; and 

Whereas the program has garnered enthusiastic coverage 

from national media, including major television networks 

NBC, CBS, and ABC, as well as international television 

and print coverage: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate, in honor of the 10th anni2 versary of the R.E.A.D. program, designates November 

3 14, 2009, as ‘‘National Reading Education Assistance 

4 Dogs Day’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 23**

CONSENT OF KPMG LLP

The Board of Directors

Rock of Ages Corporation:

We consent to the inclusion of our report dated March 2, 2001
with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Rock of Ages Corporation as
of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders' equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2000, which report
appears in the December 31, 2000 annual report on Form 10-K of Rock of Ages
Corporation.

KPMG LLP

/x/ KPMG LLP

Boston, Massachusetts

March 30, 2001
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 24.1



                              ROBBINS & MYERS, INC.
                              ---------------------

                            LIMITED POWER OF ATTORNEY
                            -------------------------

                  WHEREAS, Robbins & Myers, Inc. (the "Company") intends to file
with the Securities and Exchange Commission its Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended August 31, 1997:

                  NOW, THEREFORE, each of the undersigned in his capacity as a
director of the Company hereby appoints Daniel W. Duval his true and lawful
attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution,
to execute in his name, place and stead, the Company's Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended August 31, 1997, (including any amendment to such
report) and any and all other instruments necessary or incidental in connection
therewith, and to file the same with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Said attorney shall have full power and authority to do and perform in the name
and on behalf of the undersigned, in the aforesaid capacity, every act
whatsoever necessary or desirable to be done, as fully to all intents and
purposes as the undersigned might or could do in person. The undersigned hereby
ratifies and approves the act of said attorney.

                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this
instrument this 24th day of November, 1997.

                                         /s/ Maynard H. Murch, IV
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Maynard H. Murch, IV


                                         /s/ Robert J. Kegerreis
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Robert J. Kegerreis


                                         /s/ Thomas P. Loftis
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Thomas P. Loftis



                                         /s/ William D. Manning, Jr.
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         William D. Manning, Jr.


                                         /s/ Jerome F. Tatar
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Jerome F. Tatar
# Table 3.6

# RSE 3.6