alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. Energy Information Administration | Quarterly Coal Report, January - March 2024

Table 39. Coal stocks at other industrial plants by census division and state

(thousand short tons)

Census division

and state March 31, 2024 December 31, 2023 March 31, 2023

Percent change

(March 31)

2024 versus 2023

Middle Atlantic 185 220 186 -0.1

New York 28 42 37 -23.6

Pennsylvania 157 178 148 5.8

East North Central 412 516 369 11.7

Illinois 46 61 20 138.0

Indiana 127 177 188 -32.8

Michigan 165 180 87 89.4

Ohio 21 21 26 -16.8

Wisconsin 52 76 48 9.3

West North Central 597 547 567 5.3

Iowa 117 137 167 -29.8

Kansas 25 15 14 81.5

Minnesota 39 44 45 -13.0

Missouri 111 114 103 7.6

Nebraska 24 8 33 -26.4

North Dakota 218 190 171 27.4

South Dakota 63 39 35 82.1

South Atlantic 324 324 349 -6.9

Florida 51 34 58 -11.9

Georgia 35 59 53 -33.6

Maryland 25 16 29 -12.9

North Carolina 88 89 88 -0.4

South Carolina 61 46 45 35.7

Virginia 47 62 57 -17.9

West Virginia 19 18 20 -7.2

East South Central 262 256 233 12.4

Alabama 83 82 73 13.5

Kentucky 58 63 66 -12.3

Mississippi 3 6 5 -33.4

Tennessee 118 105 89 31.9

West South Central 459 445 303 51.6

Arkansas 27 26 33 -18.4

Louisiana 3 3 4 -34.6

Oklahoma 249 243 154 61.7

Texas 180 172 111 61.6

Mountain 405 418 340 19.1

Arizona 63 54 17 265.2

Colorado 29 28 31 -6.9

Idaho 97 104 135 -28.2

Montana 52 59 19 168.3

Nevada 43 32 38 12.9

New Mexico 3 4 3 -2.3

Utah 39 50 48 -18.0

Wyoming 80 86 49 61.3

Pacific 143 142 104 37.5

California 112 110 94 20.0

Oregon 25 29 7 269.3

Washington 6 3 4 59.3

U.S. Total 2,789 2,869 2,451 13.8

Note: Total may not equal sum of components because of independent rounding.

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), Form EIA-3, 'Quarterly Survey of Industrial, Commercial & Institutional Coal Users.'
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 11 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 11

   To authorize production of documents to the Department of Defense 
                           Inspector General

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 8, 2009

   Mr. Reid (for himself and Mr. McConnell) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   To authorize production of documents to the Department of Defense 
                           Inspector General

Whereas last Congress the Committee on Armed Services conducted a staff inquiry 
        into allegations regarding irregularities in the administration of a 
        contract for logistical support in Iraq by the Department of the Army;
Whereas, upon the completion of the Committee's staff inquiry, the Chairman and 
        ranking member referred to the Acting Inspector General of the 
        Department of Defense for review allegations regarding the 
        Administration of this LOGCAP contract;
Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States and rule XI of the 
        Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the 
        possession of the Senate may, by the judicial or administrative process, 
        be taken from such control or possession but by permission of the 
        Senate; and
Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or in the possession of 
        the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will 
        take such action as will promote the ends of justice consistent with the 
        privileges of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Chairman and ranking member of the Armed 
Services Committee, acting jointly, are authorized to produce to the 
Department of Defense Inspector General records of the Committee's 
staff inquiry into allegations relating to the administration of the 
Army's LOGCAP contract.
                                 <all>
```
S94A1842.

#### SOUVANKHOT v. THE STATE.

(453 SE2d 25)

Carley, Justice.

Appellant and three others were jointly indicted on alternative counts of malice murder, felony murder while in the commission of an aggravated assault, and aggravated assault. The case against appellant and two of his co-defendants was brought to trial before a jury. Although one of the co-defendants was granted a directed verdict of acquittal, the issue of the guilt of appellant and the other co-defendant was submitted to the jury. Guilty verdicts as to all three counts were returned against both appellant and the co-defendant, but the trial court imposed life sentences only as to the malice murder count. See *Malcolm v. State,*263 Ga. 369, 372 (5) (434 SE2d 479) (1993).

*16Decided February 13, 1995.

*James S. Purvis,*for appellant.

*Lewis R. Slaton, District Attorney, Carl P. Greenberg, Assistant District Attorney, Michael J. Bowers, Attorney General, Susan V. Boleyn, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Marla-Deen Brooks, Assistant Attorney General,*for appellee.

Appellant’s motion for new trial was denied and he appeals.1

Appellant enumerates only the general grounds. Although appellant admitted his presence at the scene and there was proof of his pre-existing enmity toward the victim, he relies upon the undisputed evidence that it was the co-defendant who actually fired the fatal shot. There was, however, eyewitness testimony that it was appellant who had produced the rifle and that, after giving that weapon to the co-defendant and observing the fatal shot fired, appellant fled the scene. Construing the evidence most strongly against appellant, it was sufficient to authorize a rational trier of fact to find beyond a reasonable doubt that he was a culpable party to the co-defendant’s act of fatally firing the rifle at the victim. *Jackson v. Virginia,*443 U.S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979). See also *Amerson v. State,*259 Ga. 484, 485 (1) (384 SE2d 392) (1989); *Tho Van Huynh v. State,*257 Ga. 375 (359 SE2d 667) (1987).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

1

 The homicide was committed on October 30,1993 and the indictment was returned on November 12, 1993. The guilty verdicts were returned on February 22, 1994 and the judgments of conviction and life sentences were entered on February 23,1994. Appellant’s motion for new trial was filed on March 23, 1994 and denied on July 7, 1994. The notice of appeal was filed on August 8, 1994 and the case was docketed in this court on August 22, 1994. The appeal was submitted for decision on November 18, 1994.
U.S. Energy Information Administration Quarterly Coal Report, October - December 2023

Table 27. Average price of coal receipts at other industrial plants by census division and state

(dollars per short ton)

Year to date

Census division

and state

October - December

2023

July - September

2023

October - December

2022 2023 2022

Percent

change

Middle Atlantic 127.17 133.50 108.33 128.78 103.11 24.9

New York w w w w w w

Pennsylvania w w w w w w

East North Central 109.14 107.50 89.51 107.51 82.93 29.6

Illinois w w w w w w

Indiana w w w w w w

Michigan 122.41 149.03 141.01 131.65 116.35 13.1

Ohio 155.09 161.64 124.67 158.31 127.09 24.6

Wisconsin 103.49 92.93 85.31 101.42 91.69 10.6

West North Central 35.04 36.50 34.07 35.47 31.17 13.8

Iowa w w 33.39 w w w

Kansas w w w w w w

Minnesota 54.19 54.31 56.84 55.44 54.18 2.3

Missouri 76.36 85.78 72.44 81.86 62.41 31.2

Nebraska w w 25.40 w w w

North Dakota w w w w w w

South Dakota w w w w w w

South Atlantic 173.15 173.84 160.04 170.35 144.95 17.5

Florida w w 181.31 w w w

Georgia w 230.87 w w 196.69 w

Maryland w w w w w w

North Carolina 190.64 188.76 194.84 187.07 149.70 25.0

South Carolina 203.23 175.57 178.28 199.21 142.14 40.2

Virginia 158.65 190.68 138.06 163.66 130.79 25.1

West Virginia w w w w w w

East South Central 140.55 162.35 134.23 154.03 128.77 19.6

Alabama w w w w w w

Kentucky 150.55 157.00 138.93 155.96 133.56 16.8

Mississippi w w w w w w

Tennessee 113.87 148.84 114.94 134.56 114.59 17.4

West South Central 115.44 97.82 92.10 104.65 87.41 19.7

Arkansas w w w w w w

Louisiana w w w w w w

Oklahoma w 138.33 118.84 w w w

Texas 136.28 132.64 114.56 128.63 103.74 24.0

Mountain 79.83 81.13 71.30 78.18 68.78 13.7

Arizona w w w w w w

Colorado w w w w w w

Idaho w 120.07 186.91 w w w

Montana 53.69 69.27 51.28 65.06 53.08 22.6

Nevada w w 114.18 w w w

New Mexico w w w w w w

Utah 105.16 85.05 68.57 88.13 59.63 47.8

Wyoming 57.48 58.11 59.58 58.48 56.25 4.0

Pacific 111.69 113.04 90.42 113.35 90.69 25.0

California 113.15 w 90.42 w w w

Oregon w - w w w w

Washington w w w w w w

U.S. Total 82.61 86.54 75.36 83.19 69.77 19.2

- = No data reported.

w = Data withheld to avoid disclosure.

Note: Average price is based on the cost, insurance, and freight (c.i.f. value). Total may not equal sum of components because of independent rounding.

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), Form EIA-3, 'Quarterly Survey of Industrial, Commercial & Institutional Coal Users.'
#### State v. Sasser

108,149

04/21/2016

Granted.

Unpublished
----

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/Steven M. Klosk                         |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Steven M. Klosk                            |   |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer      |   |
|   |                                       |   |
|   |                                       |   |
|   | /s/Gregory P. Sargen                       |   |
|   | Gregory P. Sargen                          |   |
|   | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |

| Dated: | November 4, 2010 |
|--------|------------------|

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary information extracted from the Form 10-Q and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000820068
<NAME> NEW YORK BANCORP INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          25,921
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    507,571
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         619,645
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           616,347
<LOANS>                                      2,056,990
<ALLOWANCE>                                     18,639
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,264,749
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,682,592
<SHORT-TERM>                                 1,310,537
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             93,411
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           295
<OTHER-SE>                                     177,914
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               3,264,749
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 42,904
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               19,412
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     2
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                62,318
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              13,795
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              32,989
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           29,329
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      300
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 131
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 13,096
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,408
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      11,992
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,992
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .54
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.73
<LOANS-NON>                                     18,051
<LOANS-PAST>                                     3,987
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 4,985
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                18,695
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      404
<RECOVERIES>                                        48
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               18,639
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            18,639
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23
 
             CONSENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
    We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
33-39791, 33-39725, 33-40400, 33-40395, 33-40396, 33-66084, 33-54397, 33-54399,
33-54393 and 33-40702 of RJR Nabisco Holdings Corp. on Form S-8 and Registration
Statement No. 33-60803 of RJR Nabisco, Inc. on Form S-3 of our report
dated January 29, 1996 (February 16, 1996 as to Note 12), appearing in this 
Annual Report on Form 10-K of RJR Nabisco Holdings Corp. and RJR Nabisco, Inc. 
for the year ended December 31, 1995.
 
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
 
New York, New York
February 21, 1996
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 66 (Monday, April 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 16632]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-8713]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL RATE COMMISSION

[Order No. 1167; Docket No. A97-16]


North Shapleigh, Maine 04060 (Harold W. Clark, Petitioner); 
Notice and Order Accepting Appeal and Establishing Procedural Schedule 
Under 39 U.S.C. Sec. 404(b)(5)

Issued April 1, 1997.
Docket Number: A97-16
Name of Affected Post Office: North Shapleigh, Maine 04060
Name(s) of Petitioner(s): Harold W. Clark
Type of Determination: Closing
Date of Filing of Appeal Papers: March 27, 1997
Categories of Issues Apparently Raised: 
    1. Effect on the community [39 U.S.C. Sec. 404(b)(2)(A)].
    2. Effect on postal services [39 U.S.C. Sec. 404(b)(2)(C)].

    After the Postal Service files the administrative record and the 
Commission reviews it, the Commission may find that there are more 
legal issues than those set forth above. Or, the Commission may find 
that the Postal Service's determination disposes of one or more of 
those issues.
    The Postal Reorganization Act requires that the Commission issue 
its decision within 120 days from the date this appeal was filed (39 
U.S.C. Sec. 404(b)(5)). In the interest of expedition, in light of the 
120-day decision schedule, the Commission may request the Postal 
Service to submit memoranda of law on any appropriate issue. If 
requested, such memoranda will be due 20 days from the issuance of the 
request and the Postal Service shall serve a copy of its memoranda on 
the petitioners. The Postal Service may incorporate by reference in its 
briefs or motions, any arguments presented in memoranda it previously 
filed in this docket. If necessary, the Commission also may ask 
petitioners or the Postal Service for more information.

The Commission Orders

    (a) The Postal Service shall file the record in this appeal by 
April 11, 1997.
    (b) The Secretary of the Postal Rate Commission shall publish this 
Notice and Order and Procedural Schedule in the Federal Register.

    By the Commission.
Margaret P. Crenshaw,
Secretary.

Appendix

March 27, 1997: Filing of Appeal letter
April 1, 1997: Commission Notice and Order of Filing of Appeal
April 21, 1997: Last day of filing of petitions to intervene [see 39 
CFR Sec. 3001.111(b)]
May 1, 1997: Petitioner's Participant Statement or Initial Brief 
[see 39 CFR Sec. 3001.115 (a) and (b)]
May 21, 1997: Postal Service's Answering Brief [see 39 CFR 
Sec. 3001.115(c)]
June 5, 1997: Petitioner's Reply Brief should Petitioner choose to 
file one [see 39 CFR Sec. 3001.115(d)]
June 12, 1997: Deadline for motions by any party requesting oral 
argument. The Commission will schedule oral argument only when it is 
a necessary addition to the written filings [see 39 CFR 
Sec. 3001.116]
July 25, 1997: Expiration of the Commission's 120-day decisional 
schedule [see 39 U.S.C. Sec. 404(b)(5)]

[FR Doc. 97-8713 Filed 4-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-FW-M
|
|

|Energy Market and Economic Impacts of H.R. 2454, the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009                                                                             
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Figure 35.  Industrial Impacts in ACESA Main Cases, 2012-2030 (percent change from reference case).  Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800).
|Figure 35.  Industrial Impacts in ACESA Main Cases, 2012-2030 (percent change from reference case).  Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800).
|Figure 35.  Industrial Impacts in ACESA Main Cases, 2012-2030 (percent change from reference case).  Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800).
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                               CAMBREX CORPORATION
     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cambrex Corporation (the "Company")
on form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven
M. Klosk, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section
1350), that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
          15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Dated: November 5, 2008


                                   /s/ Steven M. Klosk
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                   Steven M. Klosk
                                   President and Chief Executive Officer


                                       34
**EXHIBIT 10.15****EXECUTIVE OFFICER CHANGE OF CONTROL AGREEMENT AS AMENDED**          THIS EXECUTIVE OFFICER CHANGE OF CONTROL AGREEMENT AS AMENDED (the “Agreement”) isentered into between **ROBBINS & MYERS, INC.**, an Ohio corporation (the “Company”),and                     , an individual (“Executive”), as of the                      day of                    ,                   , underthe following circumstances:          The Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) considers the establishment andmaintenance of a sound and vital management to be essential to protecting and enhancing the bestinterests of the Company and its shareholders. In this connection, the Board recognizes that, as isthe case with many publicly held corporations, the mere possibility of a change of control mayraise distracting and disrupting uncertainties and questions among management personnel, mayinterfere with their whole-hearted attention and devotion to the performance of their duties, andmay even lead to their departure, all to the detriment of the best interests of the Company and itsshareholders. Accordingly, the Board, upon the recommendation of its Compensation Committee, hasdetermined that the best interests of the Company and its shareholders would be served by assuringto certain executives of the Company, including Executive, the protection provided by an agreementwhich defines the respective rights and obligations of the Company and Executive in the event oftermination of employment subsequent to a Change of Control of the Company (as defined in Section 2of this Agreement).          In order to induce Executive to continue in the employ of the Company, this Agreement setsforth the severance benefits which the Company agrees shall be provided to Executive in the eventExecutive’s employment with the Company [or with a Successor to the Company (as defined at Section10(a)] is terminated subsequent to a Change of Control under the circumstances described below.**NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE MUTUAL COVENANTS**
Release Date: November 16, 2012

comparison of EIA and STB data

Year STB EIA STB EIA

(nominal) 

EIA 

(real)

EIA STB EIA 

2001 $14.32 - $15.78 - - - - - 23.5% - 

2002 $13.64 - $14.80 - - - - - 24.2% - 

2003 $15.12 - $16.06 - - - - - 22.0% - 

2004 $14.53 - $15.01 - - - - - 27.3% - 

2005 $17.78 - $17.78 - - - - - 34.4% - 

2006 $19.72 - $19.10 - - - - - 31.4% - 

2007 $23.41 - $22.03 - - - - - 31.3% - 

2008 $21.92 $24.66 $20.19 $22.71 12.5% $55.24 $50.87 44.6% 26.0% 66.2%

2009 $18.27 $18.54 $16.65 $16.90 1.5% $55.16 $50.27 33.6% 30.1% 74.3%

2010 - $20.28 - $18.27 - $60.40 $54.42 33.6% - 74.5%

Annual Percent Change

First to

Last 

Year 3.1% -9.3% 0.7% -10.3% - 4.6% 3.4% - - - 

Latest 2 

Years -16.6% 9.4% -17.5% 8.1% - 9.5% 8.3% - - - 

- = No data reported or value not applicable

STB Data Source: The Surface Transportation Board's 900-Byte Carload Waybill Sample

EIA Data Source: Form EIA-923 Power Plant Operations Report

Real values derived using the GDP Chain-type Price Index, 2005 = 100.

Table 8. Estimated average rail transportation rates for coal originating in the Uinta Basin

Transportation 

cost

per short ton 

(nominal)

Transportation 

cost

per short ton 

(real)

Total

delivered cost

per short ton

Shipments with 

transportation

rates over

total shipments

(percent)

Percent 

transportation 

cost is of total 

delivered cost

EIA

Percent 

difference

EIA vs. STB