alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000820047
<NAME> FMG RITA RANCH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             594
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         350,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 350,594
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,150
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     326,444
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   350,594
<SALES>                                             50
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    50
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,589
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,539)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,539)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
No. 12-5315.

#### Rojas-Vega *v.*Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT
32
  CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002
   In
connection with the quarterly report of ILX Resorts Incorporated (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the nine months ending September 30, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I (We),
Joseph P. Martori, Chief Executive Officer, and Margaret M. Eardley, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
  (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
    /s/ Joseph P.
Martori_____________________
 Joseph P.
Martori
 Chief
Executive Officer
 November
13, 2008
    /s/ Margaret M.
Eardley___________________
 Margaret
M. Eardley
 Chief
Financial Officer
 November
13, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 63 (Wednesday, April 2, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 15670]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-8349]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Proposed Subsequent Arrangement

    Pursuant to Section 131 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as 
amended (42 U.S.C. 2160), notice is hereby given of a proposed 
``subsequent arrangement'' under the Agreement for Cooperation between 
the Government of the United States of America and the Government of 
Canada concerning Civil Uses of Atomic Energy, as amended, and the 
Agreement for Cooperation between the Government of the United States 
of America and the Government of Australia concerning Peaceful Uses of 
Nuclear Energy.
    The subsequent arrangement to be carried out under the above-
mentioned agreements involves approval of the following retransfer: 
RTD/CA(AU)-2 for the transfer of 596.2 kilograms of heavy water, 
containing approximately 5.5 ci/kilogram tritium, from Australia to 
Canada as part of the detritiation exchange, will be used by Ontario 
Hydro in the operation of the Darlington Nuclear Generating Station.
    In accordance with Section 131 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as 
amended, it has been determined that this subsequent arrangement will 
not be inimical to the common defense and security.
    This subsequent arrangement will take effect no sooner that fifteen 
days after the date of publication of this notice.

    Issued in Washington, DC on March 26, 1997.
Cherie P. Fitzgerald,
Director, International Policy and Analysis Division, Office of Arms 
Control and Nonproliferation.
[FR Doc. 97-8349 Filed 4-1-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 58 (Wednesday, March 26, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 14384]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-7708]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 97-97, RM-9047]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Mt. Juliet and Belle Meade, TN

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission requests comments on a petition filed by Mt. 
Juliet Broadcasting, Inc., permittee of Station WNPL(FM), Channel 294A, 
Mt. Juliet, Tennessee, proposing the reallotment of Channel 294A from 
Mt. Juliet to Belle Meade, Tennessee, and modification of Station 
WNPL(FM)'s construction permit to specify Belle Meade as its community 
of license. Channel 294A can be allotted to Belle Meade in compliance 
with the Commission's minimum distance separation requirements with a 
site restriction of 13.6 kilometers. The coordinates for Channel 294A 
at Belle Meade are 36-11-08 NL and 86-45-15 WL.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before May 12, 1997, and reply 
comments on or before May 27, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC 20554. In 
addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties should 
serve the petitioner, or its counsel or consultant, as follows: David 
E. Honig, Esq., Holland & Knight LLP, 2100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, 
Suite 400, Washington, DC 20037-3202 (Counsel for Petitioner).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pam Blumenthal, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 97-97, adopted March 12, 
1997, and released March 21, 1997. The full text of this Commission 
decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business 
hours in the FCC's Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW, 
Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, ITS, Inc., (202) 857-
3800, 2100 M Street, NW, Suite 140, Washington, DC 20037.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contacts.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 97-7708 Filed 3-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
#### State v. Brown

110,234

01/25/2016

Denied.

Unpublished
```

                                                                                        EXHIBIT 32.2

                                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                       18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                            SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of The St. Lawrence Seaway  Corporation (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the year ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Daniel L. Nir,  President  and  Treasurer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Rule 1350, as adopted pursuant to Rule 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Daniel L. Nir
-----------------------------
Daniel L. Nir
President and Treasurer
June 27, 2006
```

----
EXHIBIT 23

       CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the:

1.  Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 2-76789) pertaining
    to the Reynolds Metals Company 1982 Nonqualified Stock
    Option Plan;

2.  Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-13822) pertaining
    to the Reynolds Metals Company 1987 Nonqualified Stock
    Option Plan;

3.  Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-44400) pertaining
    to the Reynolds Metals Company 1992 Nonqualified Stock
    Option Plan;

4.  Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-20498) pertaining
    to the Reynolds Metals Company Savings and Investment
    Plan for Salaried Employees;

5.  Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 33-43443) pertaining
    to the shelf registration of debt securities of Reynolds
    Metals Company;

6.  Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-66032) pertaining
    to the Reynolds Metals Company Savings Plan for Hourly
    Employees;

7.  Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 33-51153) pertaining
    to the offer and resale of shares of Reynolds Metals
    Company Common Stock by the Trustee of the Reynolds
    Metals Company Pension Plans Master Trust;

8.  Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-53847) pertaining
    to the Employees Savings Plan;

9.  Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-53851) pertaining
    to the Reynolds Metals Company Restricted Stock Plan for
    Outside Directors;

10. Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 33-59168) pertaining
    to the registration of debt securities of Reynolds
    Aluminum Company of Canada, Ltd. (formerly known as
    Canadian Reynolds Metals Company Limited);

11. Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-00929)
    pertaining to the Reynolds Metals Company Performance
    Incentive Plan,

12. Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-03947)
    pertaining to the Reynolds Metals Company 1996
    Nonqualified Stock Option Plan;

and in the related prospectuses of our report dated February 21,
1997, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
Reynolds Metals Company included in this Annual Report (Form 10-
K) for the year ended December 31, 1996.

Ernst & Young LLP

Richmond, Virginia
March 18, 1997
EXHIBIT 23.1


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


SBE, Inc.
San Ramon, California

We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statement  on Form S-8 (No.  33-42629)  of our report  dated  December 10, 2004,
relating to the  consolidated  financial  statements  and schedules of SBE, Inc.
which  appears in the  Company's  Annual  Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
October 31, 2004.

/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP

San Francisco, California
January 12, 2005
Exhibit 10.26


 


 


 


March 27, 2020


 


Jay Dubiner


####


####


####


 


Dear Jay,


 


Reference is made to the Second Amended and
Restated Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”), is entered into as of August 9, 2019 (the “Effective
Date”), by and between Jay Dubiner (the “Executive”) and Authentic Brands Group LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company (“ABG” and, together with any of members of the ABG Group as may employ the Executive from time
to time, and any successor(s) thereto, the “Company”). Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have
the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Agreement.


 


The purpose of this letter is to set forth the terms and
conditions of the agreement between the Executive and the Company to temporarily modify and amend certain terms and conditions of the
Agreement.


 


For valuable consideration, the value
and sufficiency of which is hereby agreed and acknowledged, notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the Agreement, Executive
and the Company agree as follows:


 


		(a)	Executive’s Annual Base Salary and Annual Bonus opportunity for the calendar
year ending December 31, 2020, shall be the same as calendar year ending December 31, 2019.



 


		(b)	50% of Executive’s Annual Base Salary shall be deferred (the “Deferred
Amount”) for a period of 9 months from April 1, 2020 (such period of time the “Deferral Period”).



 


		(c)	Upon the termination of the Deferral Period Executive’s Annual Base Salary shall be returned to
its normal level taking into consideration any increase in Annual Base Salary Executive would have received for calendar year 2020.



 


		(d)	Upon the termination of the Deferral Period, at the sole discretion of the Company’s
Board of Directors, the Company may pay to Executive all, some or none of the Deferred Amount.



 


		(e)	The reduction of Executive’s Annual Base Salary, solely during the Deferral
Period, shall not be deemed “Good Reason” under the Agreement.



 


Notwithstanding the foregoing, and for greater certainty,
the Severance Amount in the Agreement shall be calculated without reference to the Deferral Amount and based upon the Annual Base Salary
before such reduction.


 


Other than as set forth in this Letter Agreement all other
terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.





 


1411 BROADWAY, 4TH FL, NEW
YORK, NY 10018 | 212.760.2410


 






     


     


    




 


This Letter Agreement shall be governed
by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware. This Letter Agreement may be executed in several counterparts,
each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which together will constitute one and the same Agreement.


 


Sincerely, 


Authentic Brands Group LLC


 


 





	By:	/s/ Kevin Clarke	 
	Name:	 
	Title:	 


 


Accepted and Agreed:


 


 





	/s/ Jay Dubiner	 
	Jay Dubiner
#### COVENANT HOME, INC. *v.*TOWN OF CROMWELL

(AC 20599)

Schaller, Mihalakos and Stoughton, Js.

Argued February 27

officially released May 8, 2001

*338
      *Kenneth R. Slater, Jr.,*with whom, on the brief, was *Edward T. Lynch, Jr.,*for the appellant (plaintiff).

*John W. Bradley, Jr.,*for the appellee (defendant).

*Opinion*

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff, Covenant Home, Inc., appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying a petition and motion for contempt by which it sought to have the defendant, the town of Cromwell, adjudged in contempt for its disregard of a prior judgment. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

In 1988, the parties stipulated to a judgment in connection with a settlement of tax appeals. A judgment was rendered in accordance with the stipulation on December 28, 1988. As part of the judgment, and in accordance with the stipulation, the court found that the infirmary located on the plaintiffs property was exempt from taxation. In February, 1999, the assessor for the defendant determined that the infirmary no longer was exempt from taxation, and the plaintiff appealed to the board of assessment appeals, which denied the appeal. The plaintiff then filed its petition and motion for contempt, which the court denied. This appeal followed.

The plaintiff claims that the court improperly (1) found that the remedy of contempt is not available to enforce the judgment against the defendant and (2) denied the plaintiff an evidentiary hearing. We disagree.

Our examination of the record and briefs has persuaded us that the judgment of the court should be *339affirmed. The issues presented at trial were resolved properly in the court’s thoughtful and comprehensive memorandum of decision. See *Covenant Home, Inc.*v. *Cromwell,*47 Conn. Sup. 60, 777 A.2d 216 (2000). Because the decision fully addresses the arguments raised in this appeal, we adopt it as a proper statement of the facts and the applicable law on those issues. It would serve no useful purpose for us to repeat the discussion contained in the court’s decision. See *East*v. *Labbe,*54 Conn. App. 479, 480-81, 735 A.2d 370 (1999), aff'd, 252 Conn. 359, 746 A.2d 751 (2000).

The judgment is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000819927
<NAME>                        Trackpower, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               FEB-28-2001
<PERIOD-START>                  MAR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    NOV-03-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                           1
<CASH>                                                9,229
<SECURITIES>                                         32,480
<RECEIVABLES>                                        12,168
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     54,658
<PP&E>                                              190,166
<DEPRECIATION>                                      133,793
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      664,810
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1,495,102
<BONDS>                                           2,996,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                       1,000,000
<COMMON>                                              4,041
<OTHER-SE>                                       (4,813,822)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        664,810
<SALES>                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    118,501
<CGS>                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     2,479,098
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    597,608
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (2,958,205)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (2,958,205)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (2,958,205)
<EPS-BASIC>                                            (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          (.08)


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

___________________

No. 96-50055

Summary Calendar

___________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LIGIA BALU, also known as Rita Dimici,

also known as Rita Dimuci, also known as

Sanel Stolzenberg, also known as

Chanel Stolzenberg, also known as

Chanel Solzenberg, also known as Sanel

Solzenberg, also known as Lidia Balu,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Western District of Texas

USDC No. SA-90-CR-43-1

________________________________________________

April 8, 1996

Before GARWOOD, WIENER and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Ligia Balu appeals the district court’s denial of her motion

for modification of probation. Balu argues that the district court

violated Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.1(b) by not holding a hearing on her

motion to terminate probation. Rule 32.1(b) requires a hearing

only if the proposed relief is not favorable to the defendant. In
2

this case, the proposed relief was favorable. That favorable

relief was not granted does not mandate a hearing under Rule

32.1(b). Balu has shown no reversible error in the district

court’s denial of what is at least her third motion to terminate

her probation. This court affirmed the denial of an earlier such

motion by Balu on January 25, 1995. Balu’s most recent previous

motion was denied August 25, 1995, and reconsideration was denied

September 1, 1995; no appeal was taken. Instead, the instant

motion, asserting essentially the same grounds, was filed September

28, 1995. The district court clearly proceeded on the assumption

that it had jurisdiction to grant the relief sought, and we also so

assume (arguendo).

Balu’s motion for expedited hearing is denied as unnecessary.

AFFIRMED.
# mecs56
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 246 

Requiring that legislation considered by the Senate to be confined to a 

single issue. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 6, 2009 

Mr. ENZI (for himself and Mr. BARRASSO) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Requiring that legislation considered by the Senate to be 

confined to a single issue. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. SINGLE ISSUE REQUIREMENT. 

3 (a) POINT OF ORDER.—It shall not be in order in 

4 the Senate to consider a bill or resolution that is not con5 fined to a single subject. 

6 (b) SUPERMAJORITY WAIVER AND APPEALS.— 

7 (1) WAIVER.—This section may be waived or 

8 suspended in the Senate only by the affirmative vote 

9 of two-thirds of the Members, duly chosen and 

10 sworn. 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 246 IS 

1 (2) APPEALS.—Appeals in the Senate from the 

2 decisions of the Chair relating to any provision of 

3 this section shall be limited to 30 minutes, to be 

4 equally divided between, and controlled by, the ap5 pellant and the manager of the bill or joint resolu6 tion. An affirmative vote of two-thirds of the Mem7 bers of the Senate, duly chosen and sworn, shall be 

8 required to sustain an appeal of the ruling of the 

9 Chair on a point of order raised under this section. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
No. 12-5831.

#### Stewart *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.