17136 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 68 / Wednesday, April 9, 1997 / Proposed Rules

ASW–31.’’ The postcard will be date/

time stamped and returned to the

commenter. All communications

received on or before the specified

closing date for comments will be

considered before taking action on the

proposed rule. The proposal contained

in this notice may be changed in light

of comments received. All comments

submitted will be available for

examination in the Rules Docket both

before and after the closing date for

comments. A report summarizing each

substantive public contact with FAA

personnel concerned with this

rulemaking will be filed in the docket.

Availability of NPRM’s

Any person may obtain a copy of this

NPRM by submitting a request to the

Federal Aviation Administration, Office

of Air Traffic Airspace Management,

800 Independence Avenue, SW,

Washington, DC 20591, or by calling

(202) 267–8783. Communications must

identify the notice number of this

NPRM. Persons interested in being

placed on a mailing list for future

NPRM’s should call the FAA’s Office of

Rulemaking, (202) 267–9677, for a copy

of Advisory Circular No. 11–2A, Notice

of Proposed Rulemaking Distribution

System, that describes the application

procedure.

The Proposal

The FAA is considering an

amendment to Title 14 of the Federal

Aviation Regulations part 71 (14 CFR

part 71) to realign four Federal airways

located in the Helena, AR, area. This

proposed realignment will coincide

with the activation of the Marvell VOR/

DME NAVAID, which is currently under

construction.

Currently, four airways intersect at a

noncompulsory reporting point named

‘‘Walet,’’ which is located within the 30-

nautical-mile (NM) circle of the

Memphis Class B airspace area. As such,

all aircraft transiting this area between

5,000 and 10,000 feet mean sea level

(MSL) must fly through the Memphis

Class B airspace area. By realigning

these airways to directly overfly the

Marvell VOR/DME (approximately 17

NM to the southwest of ‘‘Walet’’), a

navigable airway structure would be

provided to en route traffic, which

would not conflict with the Class B

airspace area at Memphis. Additionally,

Memphis International Airport plans to

use Marvell VOR/DME as a feeder fix

into the airport. Having these four

airways intersect at Marvell would

enhance aircraft routing and handling.

As a result, this action would aid flight

planning, reduce en route and terminal

delays, and enhance the management of

air traffic operations in the Memphis,

TN, Class B airspace area.

The FAA has determined that this

regulation only involves an established

body of technical regulations for which

frequent and routine amendments are

necessary to keep them operationally

current. It, therefore—(1) is not a

‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under

Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a

‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT

Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44

FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3)

does not warrant preparation of a

regulatory evaluation as the anticipated

impact is so minimal. Since this is a

routine matter that will only affect air

traffic procedures and air navigation, it

is certified that this rule, when

promulgated, will not have a significant

economic impact on a substantial

number of small entities under the

criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

Airspace, Incorporation by reference,

Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

In consideration of the foregoing, the

Federal Aviation Administration

proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as

follows:

PART 71—[AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for part 71

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113,

40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–

1963 Comp., p. 389; 14 CFR 11.69.

§ 71.1 [Amended]

2. The incorporation by reference in

14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal Aviation

Administration Order 7400.9D, Airspace

Designations and Reporting Points,

dated September 4, 1996, and effective

September 16, 1996, is amended as

follows:

Paragraph 6010(a) Domestic VOR Federal

Airways

* * * * *

V–9 [Revised]

From Leeville, LA; McComb, MS; Jackson,

MS; Sidon, MS; Marvell, AR; Gilmore, AR;

Malden, MO; Farmington, MO; St. Louis,

MO; Capital, IL; Pontiac, IL; INT Pontiac 343°

and Rockford, IL, 169° radials; Rockford;

Janesville, WI; Madison, WI; Oshkosh, WI;

Green Bay, WI; Iron Mountain, MI; to

Houghton, MI.

* * * * *

V–16 [Revised]

From Los Angeles, CA; Paradise, CA; Palm

Springs, CA; Blythe, CA; Buckeye, AZ;

Phoenix, AZ; INT Phoenix 155° and

Stanfield, AZ, 105° radials; Tucson, AZ;

Cochise, AZ; Columbus, NM; El Paso, TX;

Salt Flat, TX; Wink, TX; Wink 066° and Big

Spring, TX, 260° radials; Big Spring; Abilene,

TX; Millsap, TX; Glen Rose, TX; Cedar Creek,

TX; Quitman, TX; Texarkana, AR; Pine Bluff,

AR; Marvell, AR; Holly Springs, MS; Jacks

Creek, TN; Shelbyville, TN; Hinch Mountain,

TN; Volunteer, TN; Holston Mountain, TN;

Pulaski, VA; Roanoke, VA; Lynchburg, VA;

Flat Rock, VA; Richmond, VA; INT

Richmond 039° and Patuxent, MD, 228°

radials; Patuxent; Smyrna, DE; Cedar Lake,

NJ; Coyle, NJ; INT Coyle 036° and Kennedy,

NY, 209° radials; Kennedy; Deer Park, NY;

Calverton, NY; Norwich, CT; Boston, MA.

The airspace within Mexico and the airspace

below 2,000 feet MSL outside the United

States is excluded. The airspace within

Restricted Areas R–5002A, R–5002C, and R–

5002D is excluded during their times of use.

The airspace within Restricted Areas R–4005

and R–4006 is excluded.

* * * * *

* * * * *

V–54 [Revised]

From Waco, TX; Cedar Creek, TX;

Quitman, TX; Texarkana, AR; INT Texarkana

052° and Little Rock, AR, 235° radials; Little

Rock; Marvell, AR; Holly Springs, MS;

Muscle Shoals, AL; Rocket, AL; Choo Choo,

GA; Harris, GA; Spartanburg, SC; Charlotte,

NC; Sandhills, NC; INT Sandhills 146° and

Fayetteville, NC, 267° radials; Fayetteville; to

Kinston, NC.

* * * * *

V–397 [Revised]

From Monroe, LA, via INT Monroe 056°

and Greenville, MS, 207° radials; Greenville;

to Marvell, AR.

* * * * *

Issued in Washington, DC, on April 1,

1997.

Jeff Griffith,

Program Director for Air Traffic Airspace

Management.

[FR Doc. 97–9145 Filed 4–8–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[MN40–01–6988b; FRL–5694–5]

Approval and Promulgation of State

Implementation Plan; Minnesota;

Enhanced Monitoring

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a

revision to the Minnesota State

Implementation Plan (SIP). The State’s

revision expands the types of testing

and monitoring data, including stack
Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 68 / Wednesday, April 9, 1997 / Proposed Rules 17137

and process monitoring, which can be

used directly for compliance

certifications and enforcement.

DATES: Comments on this proposed

action must be received by May 9, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should

be sent to: Carlton T. Nash, Chief,

Regulation Development Section, Air

Programs Branch (AR–18J), Region 5, 77

West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,

Illinois 60604–3590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brad

Beeson at (312) 353–4779.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For

additional information, see the Direct

Final notice which is located in the

Rules section of this Federal Register.

Copies of the request and the EPA’s

analysis are available for inspection at

the following address: (Please telephone

Brad Beeson at (312) 353–4779 before

visiting the Region 5 office.) EPA,

Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77

West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,

Illinois 60604–3590.

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401–7671q.

Dated: February 7, 1997.

Michelle D. Jordan,

Acting Regional Administrator.

[FR Doc. 97–8970 Filed 4–8–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[UT–001–0001b; FRL–5802–1]

Clean Air Act Approval and

Promulgation of Air Quality

Implementation Plan Revision for Utah;

Visibility Protection

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: EPA proposes to approve a

revision to Utah’s State Implementation

Plan (SIP) for Visibility Protection, as

submitted by the Governor with a letter

dated July 25, 1996. The revision was

adopted by the State in 1993 to address

comments received from the 1992 Utah

Legislature’s Administrative Rules

Review Committee regarding the need to

remove a visibility policy statement

from a regulation format (since it is not

a rule). The State responded by deleting

the policy statement from the Utah Air

Conservation Regulations and adding

the text into the Visibility Protection

SIP. This submittal was a necessary

‘‘housekeeping’’ step to bring the

federally approved SIP up-to-date with

administrative revisions that took place

at the State in 1993.

In the Final Rules Section of this

Federal Register, EPA is acting on the

State’s SIP revisions as a direct final

rule without prior proposal because the

Agency views this as a noncontroversial

revision amendment and anticipates no

adverse comments. A detailed rationale

for EPA’s actions is set forth in the

direct final rule. If no adverse comments

are received in response to this

proposed rule, no further activity is

contemplated and the direct final rule

will become effective. If EPA receives

adverse comments, the direct final rule

will be withdrawn and all public

comments received will be addressed in

a subsequent final rule based on this

proposed rule. EPA will not institute a

second comment period on this action.

Any parties interested in commenting

on this document should do so at this

time.

DATES: Comments on this proposed rule

must be received in writing by May 9,

1997.

ADDRESSES: Written comments on this

action should be addressed to Richard

R. Long, Director, Air Program, EPA

Region VIII at the address listed below.

Copies of the State’s submittal and

documents relevant to this proposed

rule are available for inspection during

normal business hours at the following

locations: Air Program, Environmental

Protection Agency, Region VIII, 999

18th Street, suite 500, Denver, Colorado

80202–2405; and Utah Department of

Environmental Quality, Division of Air

Quality, 150 North 1950 West, P.O. Box

144820, Salt Lake City, Utah 84114–

4820.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Amy Platt, 8P2–A, Environmental

Protection Agency, Region VIII, (303)

312–6449.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: See the

information provided in the Direct Final

action which is located in the Rules

Section of this Federal Register.

Dated: March 14, 1997.

Max H. Dodson,

Acting Regional Administrator.

[FR Doc. 97–9107 Filed 4–8–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[FRL–5800–9]

Approval and Promulgation of Air

Quality Implementation Plans;

Reasonably Available Control

Technology for Nitrogen Oxides for the

State of New Hampshire

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve

a State Implementation Plan (SIP)

revision submitted by the State of New

Hampshire. This revision establishes

and requires Reasonably Available

Control Technology (RACT) at

stationary sources of nitrogen oxides

(NOx). In the Final Rules Section of this

Federal Register, EPA is approving the

State’s SIP revision as a direct final rule

without prior proposal because the

Agency views this as a noncontroversial

revision amendment and anticipates no

adverse comments. A detailed rationale

for the approval is set forth in the direct

final rule. If no adverse comments are

received in response to that direct final

rule, no further activity is contemplated

in relation to this proposed rule. If EPA

receives adverse comments, the direct

final rule will be withdrawn and all

public comments received will be

addressed in a subsequent final rule

based on this proposed rule. EPA will

not institute a second comment period

on this proposal. Any parties interested

in commenting on this proposal should

do so at this time.

DATES: Comments must be received on

or before May 9, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to

Susan Studlien, Deputy Director, Office

of Ecosystem Protection (mail code

CAA), U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency, Region I, JFK Federal Bldg.,

Boston, MA 02203. Copies of the State

submittal and EPA’s technical support

document are available for public

inspection during normal business

hours, by appointment, at the Office of

Ecosytem Protection, U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency,

Region I, One Congress Street, 11th

floor, Boston, MA and, the Air

Resources Division, Department of

Environmental Services, 64 North Main

Street, Caller Box 2033, Concord, NH

03302–2033.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Steven A. Rapp, Environmental

Engineer, Air Quality Planning Unit

(CAQ), U.S. EPA, Region 1, JFK Federal