alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
KILGORE– ARMY 20070941

**UNITED STATES ARMY COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS**

Before

ZOLPER, COOK, and BAIME

Appellate Military Judges

**UNITED STATES, Appellee**

**v.**

**Private E1 JACOB B. KILGORE**

**United States Army, Appellant**

ARMY 20070941

Headquarters, 1st Infantry Division and Fort Riley

John P. Saunders, Military Judge

Colonel Scott W. Arnold, Staff Judge Advocate 

For Appellant:  Colonel Christopher J. O’Brien, JA; Lieutenant Colonel Steven C. Henricks, JA; Major Teresa L. Raymond, JA; Captain W. Jeremy Stephens, JA (on brief). 

For Appellee:  Colonel Denise R. Lind, JA; Major Lisa L. Gumbs, JA; Major Donna E. Leavitt, JA (on brief).

28 August 2008

-----------------------------------------

SUMMARY DISPOSITION

-----------------------------------------

Per Curiam:

Appellant was convicted by a military judge sitting as a general court-marital, pursuant to his pleas, of conspiracy to commit larceny over $500.00, failure to repair, absence without leave, willfully disobeying a superior commissioned officer, false official statement (two specifications), larceny of a value over $500.00, forgery, and breaking restriction, in violation of Uniform Code of Military Justice [hereafter UCMJ], Articles 81, 86, 90, 107, 121, 123 and 134; 10 U.S.C. §§ 881, 886, 890, 907, 921, 923, and 934 (2005).  We agree with appellate counsel that appellant suffered illegal post-trial confinement.  

While we affirm the findings of guilty and the sentence, we also order that the appellant receive twenty-eight days of pay and allowances at the grade of E1 to compensate appellant for twenty-eight days of illegal post-trial confinement.  *See**United States v. Hammond*, 61 M.J. 676, 678 (Army Ct. Crim. App. 2005).      

FOR THE COURT:

MALCOLM H. SQUIRES, JR.

Clerk of Court

� Government appellate counsel agree that the appellant suffered twenty-eight days of illegal post-trial confinement from 6 November through 4 December 2007, and that financial remuneration is the appropriate remedy.  However, government appellate counsel argue that because the appellant received full pay and allowances from 6 November to 20 November 2007, due to the convening authority deferring automatic forfeitures, appellant should only receive fourteen days of full pay and allowances for the period of 21 November through 4 December to avoid overpaying appellant.  We disagree and find the convening authority’s independent act of deferring forfeitures unrelated to the issue of providing appellant a remedy for suffering illegal post-trial confinement.  

� We have considered the matters personally asserted by appellant pursuant to United States v. Grostefon, 12 M.J. 431 (C.M.A. 1982), and find them to be encompassed by the appellant’s asserted assignment of error regarding illegal post-trial confinement.

PAGE  

2
San Joaqu¡n Valley ?!

AIR POTLUTIflÌ{ CflilTRflL DISTRICT HEALTHY AIR LIVINGJune 25,2013

Matthew Lakin, Ph.D.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9

75 Havvthorne Street, AIR-7

San Francisco, CA 94105

Subject: Annual Air Monitoring Network Plan

Dear Dr. Lakin,

The San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District (District) submits the

enclosed Annual Air Monitoring Network Plan, as required by 40 CFR 58.10. This plan

satisfies federal requirements of 40 CFR 58.10 and addresses comments by EPA from

previous plans.

A Public Notice that announced a 30-day inspection period was published in eight

Valley newspapers and also posted on the District's website. The inspection period

started on March 18,2013 and went through April 18,2013. ln addition, the District

held a workshop on this plan on March 28,2013. Comments were received from Earth

Justice on April 18,2013. Appendix G of this plan contains the District's responses to

the comments received on April 18,2013 and at the workshop.

lf you have any questions about the District's Air Monitoring Network Plan, please

contact Errol Villegas, Manager of Strategies and lncentives via phone at 559-230-5806

or via email at errol.villeoas@valleyair.org.

The District requests that EPA Region 9 forward this plan to the appropriate recipients

at EPA headquarters for the PAMS equipment relocation.

Thank you,

(o, Samir Sheikh

Director of Strategies and lncentives

cc: Katherine Hoag, Environmental Protection Agency, Region I

Meredith Kurpius, Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9

Kenneth Stroud, California Air Resources Board

Karen Magliano, California Air Resources Board

Seyed Sadredin

Execulive 0irectorlAir Pollution Control 0lficer

lìlor1hern Rogion

4800 Enterprise Way

Modesto, CA 95356.8718

TsL (2091 557.6400 FAX: (209) 557-8475

Centrol Region (Main Offical

1990 E. Gettysburg Avenue

Fresno, CA 53726.0244

Tel: {559) 230.ô000 FAX: (559} 230.6061

Southorn Begion

34946 Flyovsr Court

Bakersfield, CA 93308.9725

TeL 661'392.5500 FAX: 661.392.5585

www.valleyair.org www.healthyairliving.com Pñnl.dmræïrLdp.pt. tl
# Data for Table B33

# RSEs for Table B33
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

RICHARD LEE BOYKINS, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-3153

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed March 7, 2018.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Pinellas County; William H. Burgess, III, 

Judge.

Richard Lee Boykins, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

NORTHCUTT, SILBERMAN, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.
# Table 5.6

# RSE 5.6
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 32

THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT IS BEING MADE TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSES OF SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18
U.S.C. 1350), WHICH CARRIES WITH IT CERTAIN CRIMINAL PENALTIES IN THE EVENT OF A
KNOWING OR WILLFUL MISREPRESENTATION.

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street NW
Washington, DC 20549

     Re: Perrigo Company

Ladies and Gentlemen:

     In accordance with the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (18 USC 1350), each of the undersigned hereby certifies that:

     (i)  this Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
          78o(d)); and

     (ii) the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of Perrigo Company.

Dated as of this 5th day of February, 2008.


/s/ Joseph C. Papa                      /s/ Judy L. Brown
-------------------------------------   ----------------------------------------
Joseph C. Papa                          Judy L. Brown
President and                           Executive Vice President and
Chief Executive Officer                 Chief Financial Officer


                                      -36-
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 10-1194

___________

Larry D. Bittick, *

*

Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

v. * Western District of Missouri.

*

Jeremiah Nixon; Chris Koster, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: June 1, 2010

Filed: June 16, 2010

___________

Before MELLOY, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Missouri inmate Larry D. Bittick appeals from the order of the District Court1

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. Bittick challenged a Missouri state-court

judgment that ordered reimbursement for the cost of his care and custody pursuant to

the Missouri Incarceration Reimbursement Act (MIRA). He also sought release and

return of funds seized from his inmate account pursuant to the MIRA. We have

1

The Honorable Scott O. Wright, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Missouri, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable

William A. Knox, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of

Missouri.
carefully reviewed the record de novo, see Cooper v. Schriro, 189 F.3d 781, 783 (8th

Cir. 1999) (per curiam), and we conclude that Bittick’s § 1983 action is barred by the

Rooker-Feldman2

 doctrine, see Skit Int’l, Ltd. v. DAC Techs. of Ark., Inc., 487 F.3d

1154, 1156 (8th Cir. 2007) ("The Rooker-Feldman doctrine prohibits lower federal

courts from exercising appellate review of state court judgments."), cert. denied, 552

U.S. 991 (2007). Accordingly, we affirm.

______________________________

2

See Rooker v. Fid. Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413 (1923); D.C. Ct. of Appeals v.

Feldman, 460 U.S. 462 (1983). 

-2-
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 55 (Friday, March 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 13604]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-7169]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP97-288-000]


Transwestern Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

March 17, 1997.
    Take notice that on March 12, 1997, Transwestern Pipeline Company 
(Transwestern), tendered for filing to become part of Transwestern's 
FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff 
sheets, proposed to be effective April 11, 1997.

2nd Revised Sheet No. 9A
6th Revised Sheet No. 19
8th Revised Sheet No. 20
7th Revised Sheet No. 22
12th Revised Sheet No. 29
5th Revised Sheet No. 51B
12th Revised Sheet No. 81

    Transwestern states that it is filing revisions to its Tariff to 
give Transwestern the ability to negotiate rates as contemplated by the 
Commission's Policy Statement on Alternatives to Traditional Cost-of-
Service Ratemaking Methodologies issued January 31, 1996.
    Transwestern states that copies of the filing were served upon 
Transwestern's customers and interested State Commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such petitions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken in this proceeding, but will not serve 
to make Protestant a party to the proceeding. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-7169 Filed 3-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000819926
<NAME> MALEX INC
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                             470
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   470
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     470
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           651
<OTHER-SE>                                       (181)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       470
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 55 (Friday, March 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 13712]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-7202]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[TA-W-32,531 and 531A]


Norco Windows, Incorporated (Formerly a Division of Trust Joist 
International), Hawkins, Wisconsin and Norco/Jeld Wen, Marenisco, 
Michigan; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for 
Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273) the Department of Labor issued a Notice of Certification 
Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on 
August 28, 1996, applicable to workers of Norco Windows, Incorporated 
located in Hawkins, Wisconsin. The notice was published in the Federal 
Register on September 25, 1996 (61 FR 50332).
    At the request of the State agency and petitioners, the Department 
reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. New 
findings show that all workers of the subject firm's Marenisco, 
Michigan wood patio door production facility will be separated from 
employment when the plant closes on March 15, 1997. The production at 
the Marenisco plant was dependent on the window products manufactured 
at Hawkins.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of Norco who were affected by increased imports. Accordingly, 
the Department is amending the worker certification to include the 
workers of Norco-Jeld/Wen located in Marenisco, Michigan.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-32,531 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Norco Windows, Incorporated, (formerly a Division 
of Trust Joist International), Hawkins, Wisconsin (TA-W-32,531) and 
Norco-Jeld/Wen, Marenisco, Michigan (TA-W-32,531A) who became 
totally or partially separated from employment on or after June 19, 
1995, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 
223 of the Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, DC., this 11th day of March 1997.
Russell T. Kile,
Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 97-7202 Filed 3-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

                                   (Unaudited)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                            For The Three Months
                                                               Ended March 31,

                                                             2001           2000
                                                          ---------      ---------
                                                        (as restated,
                                                         see Note 7)
<S>                                                     <C>               <C>
    NET INCOME (LOSS)                                   $    (5,342)      $      48,441

    WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES:

        Common shares outstanding                         7,540,551           6,999,987

        Assumed conversion of options and warrants          337,360                   -
                                                        -----------       -------------
                                                          7,877,911           6,999,987
                                                        ===========       =============

    INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE:

        Basic                                               $    --              $  .01

        Diluted                                             $    --              $  .01

</TABLE>

                                       16
Exhibit 32.1







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 (as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), We, the undersigned, hereby certify that to the best of our knowledge the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of The Reserve Petroleum Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








****Date: March 24, 2005
By:
/s/ Mason McLainMason McLain, President(Chief Executive Officer)


|                     |                                         |                   
|-------------------- | --------------------------------------- | ------------------
|                     | ****                                   
|                     |                                         |                   
|Date: March 24, 2005 | By:                                     | /s/ James L. Tyler
|                     | James L. Tyler                         
|                     | 2nd Vice President, Secretary/Treasurer
|                     | (Chief Financial Officer)              



47
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 334 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 334

   Designating Thursday, November 19, 2009, as ``Feed America Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 4, 2009

Mr. Hatch (for himself, Mr. Udall of New Mexico, Mr. Reid, Mr. Bennett, 
Mr. Crapo, and Mr. Lugar) submitted the following resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Designating Thursday, November 19, 2009, as ``Feed America Day''.

Whereas Thanksgiving Day celebrates the spirit of selfless giving and an 
        appreciation for family and friends;
Whereas the spirit of Thanksgiving Day is a virtue upon which the Nation was 
        founded;
Whereas according to the Department of Agriculture, roughly 35,000,000 people in 
        the United States, including 12,000,000 children, continue to live in 
        households that do not have an adequate supply of food; and
Whereas selfless sacrifice breeds a genuine spirit of thanksgiving, both 
        affirming and restoring fundamental principles in our society: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates Thursday, November 19, 2009, as ``Feed 
        America Day''; and
            (2) encourages the people of the United States to sacrifice 
        2 meals on Thursday, November 19, 2009, and to donate the money 
        that they would have spent on such food to a religious or 
        charitable organization of their choice for the purpose of 
        feeding the hungry.
                                 <all>
```
No. 12-5146.

#### Moser *v.*United States.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
April 8, 2011

Mr. Gerald Hail H&H Road Boring Company, LLC

14157 E. 580 Road Inola, OK 74036

Dear Mr. Hail:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from § 21.187 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can’t process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can’t Process Your Request

We entered your January 31, 2011, exemption request on behalf of H&H Road Boring Company, LLC into the public docket (No. FAA-2011-0271), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent doesn’t comply with the requirements of 14 CFR 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption wouldn’t adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you m ust send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. We will consider the docket on your request open until we receive this required information from you. Please note that 14 CFR 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Don’t Hear From You

If we don’t hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/ Brenda D. Courtney Manager, Aircraft and Airport Rules Division

Enclosure
# weekprod1984
##### 



EXHIBIT 23.1

Independent Auditors Consent

The Board of Directors
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Holdings, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 333-58386 and 333-92489) on Form S-3 and (Nos. 333-59690, 333-80595,
333-80597, 333-83891 and 333-112556) on Form S-8 of R.J. Reynolds Tobacco
Holdings, Inc. of our report dated January 28, 2003, except as to note 14,
which is as of February 14, 2003, and note 22, which is as of January 8, 2004,
with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Holdings,
Inc. as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated statements
of income, stockholders equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows
for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002,
which report appears in the December 31, 2002 amendment to annual report on
Form 10-K/A, Amendment No. 2 of R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Holdings, Inc.
Our report refers to the adoption in 2002 of the provisions of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets.

Our report also refers to the restatement of
the previously issued 2000 consolidated statement of income for the
reclassification of an income tax benefit from continuing operations
to discontinued operations.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Greensboro, North Carolina
March 4, 2004
# Table 3.2

# RSE 3.2
#### MACOM TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS HOLDINGS, INC., Nitronex, LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellees v. INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG, Defendant Infineon Technologies Americas Corporation, Defendant-Appellant

2017-1448

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

February 7, 2018

Amanda Tessar, Attorney, Elizabeth M. Banzhoff, Attorney, Perkins Coie, LLP, Denver, CO, Dan L. Bagatell, Perkins Coie LLP, Hanover, NH, Daniel Tyler Keese, Attorney, Perkins Coie, LLP, Portland, OR, for Plaintiffs-Appellees

David G. Wille, Attorney, Jeffery D. Baxter, Attorney, Brian Douglas Johnston, Attorney, Baker Botts, LLP, Dallas, TX, for Defendant-Appellant

Before Prost, Chief Judge, Wallach and Stoll, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Per Curiam.

Upon consideration of the parties’ February 5, 2018 response to this court’s order to show cause,

It Is Ordered That:

The opinion issued under seal on January 29,2018, is hereby unsealed.