alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.6



Statement of Chief Financial Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Southern California Gas Company (the "Company") certifies that:



(i)

the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the "Annual Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii)

the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







February 28, 2012





/S/  Robert M. SchlaxRobert M. SchlaxChief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 60 (Friday, March 28, 1997)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 14773]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-8123]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 60 / Friday, March 28, 1997 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 14773]]

                Executive Order 13040 of March 25, 1997

                
Amendment to Executive Order 13017, Advisory 
                Commission on Consumer Protection and Quality in the 
                Health Care
                Industry

                By the authority vested in me as President by the 
                Constitution and the laws of the United States of 
                America, and in order to expand membership and ensure 
                broad-based representation for the Advisory Commission 
                on Consumer Protection and Quality in the Health Care 
                Industry and to revise the deadlines for the 
                Commission's submission to the President of interim and 
                final reports, it is hereby ordered as follows:

                Section 1. Section 1(a) of Executive Order 13017 is 
                amended by deleting the number ``20'' in the second 
                sentence and inserting the number ``32'' in lieu 
                thereof.

                Sec. 2. Section 3 of Executive Order 13017 is amended 
                to read as follows:

                ``Sec. 3. Reports. The Commission shall make a 
                preliminary report to the President by January 31, 
                1998. A final report shall be submitted to the 
                President by March 30, 1998.''

                    (Presidential Sig.)<Clinton1><Clinton2>

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    March 25, 1997.

[FR Doc. 97-8123
Filed 3-27-97; 8:45 am]
Billing code 3195-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 283 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 283

    Expressing support for the goals and ideals of the first annual 
 National Wild Horse and Burro Adoption Day taking place on September 
                               26, 2009.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 23, 2009

 Mr. Reid (for himself, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Ensign, and Ms. Landrieu) 
 submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Expressing support for the goals and ideals of the first annual 
 National Wild Horse and Burro Adoption Day taking place on September 
                               26, 2009.

Whereas, in 1971, in Public Law 92-195 (commonly known as the ``Wild Free-
        Roaming Horses and Burros Act'') (16 U.S.C. 1331 et seq.), Congress 
        declared that wild free-roaming horses and burros are living symbols of 
        the historic and pioneer spirit of the West;
Whereas, under that Act, the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of 
        Agriculture have responsibility for the humane capture, removal, and 
        adoption of wild horses and burros;
Whereas the Bureau of Land Management and the Forest Service are the Federal 
        agencies responsible for carrying out the provisions of the Act;
Whereas a number of private organizations will assist with the adoption of 
        excess wild horses and burros, in conjunction with the first National 
        Wild Horse and Burro Adoption Day; and
Whereas there are approximately 31,000 wild horses in short-term and long-term 
        holding facilities, with 18,000 young horses awaiting adoption: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) supports the goals of a National Wild Horse and Burro 
        Adoption Day to be held annually in coordination with the 
        Secretary of Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture;
            (2) recognizes that creating a successful adoption model 
        for wild horses and burros is consistent with Public Law 92-195 
        (commonly known as the ``Wild Free-Roaming Horses and Burros 
        Act'') (16 U.S.C. 1331 et seq.) and beneficial to the long-term 
        interests of the people of the United States in protecting wild 
        horses and burros; and
            (3) encourages citizens of the United States to adopt a 
        wild horse or burro so as to own a living symbol of the 
        historic and pioneer spirit of the West.
                                 <all>
```
#### State v. Stanley

112,828

08/31/2016

Denied.

Unpublished
S95A0733.

#### DILLARD v. DILLARD.

(458 SE2d 102)

Sears, Justice.

The parties divorced in 1991. The divorce decree obligates the husband to make a specific number of alimony payments in specific amounts, and terminates the husband’s alimony obligation upon the wife’s remarriage. The husband petitioned for modification of alimony in 1993. The trial court dismissed the petition, finding that the husband’s obligation is for lump-sum alimony and as such is not subject to modification. The issue before us is whether the obligation is in fact for lump-sum alimony, or is instead for periodic alimony and subject to modification. Because there are limitations on the husband’s obligation inconsistent with lump-sum alimony, we hold that the obligation is for periodic alimony, and we reverse the trial court.

*479Decided June 5, 1995 —

Reconsideration denied June 23, 1995.

*Griner & Mírate, Galen A. Mírate, Ellisa Garrett, Susan P. Tate,*for appellant.

*Henry & Pearson, J. Hue Henry, Regina M. Quick,*for appellee.

An obligation is considered lump-sum alimony if it states the exact number and amount of payments “without other limitations, conditions or statements of intent.”1 The obligation in this case does state the number and amount of alimony payments, but it also contains “other limitations, conditions or statements of intent” characteristic of periodic alimony. For example, periodic alimony terminates when the receiving spouse remarries,2 as does this obligation. Also, an obligation is considered periodic alimony where the total amount of the obligation is contingent and “cannot be determined at present.”3 In this case, the total sum owed by the husband cannot be determined, as it depends upon whether or not the wife remarries. Thus the husband’s obligation is for periodic alimony, and as periodic alimony the obligation is subject to modification.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

1

*Winokur v. Winokur,*258 Ga. 88, 90 (1) (365 SE2d 94) (1988).

2

 See OCGA § 19-6-5 (b); see also *Stone v. Stone,*254 Ga. 519 (1) (330 SE2d 887) (1985).

3

*Sapp v. Sapp,*259 Ga. 238, 240 (378 SE2d 674) (1989).
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   Exhibit 10.23

                              FRONTIER CORPORATION

                      SUPPLEMENTAL MANAGEMENT PENSION PLAN

                                Amendment No. 2


     Pursuant to Section 6.1, the Plan is amended, effective August 1, 1997, by
deleting the first sentence of the second paragraph of Section 3.1 and
substituting the following in its place:

     And otherwise eligible employee who, without the consent of the Board,
     engages in any activity inimical to the interests of any Participating
     Company within two years of retirement shall cease being eligible to
     receive any further benefits after commencing such activity, provided that
     upon a Change in Control this sentence shall have no effect.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused its duly authorized officer to
execute this amendment on its behalf this 10th day of August 1998.

                                    FRONTIER CORPORATION


                                      /s/ Barbara J. LaVerdi
                              By: ----------------------------------------
                                  Barbara J. LaVerdi, Assistant Secretary
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            FEB-28-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                 MAY-31-1998
<CASH>                                             8,924 
<SECURITIES>                                   1,540,672 
<RECEIVABLES>                                      8,548 
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0 
<INVENTORY>                                            0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,592,188 
<PP&E>                                           155,521 
<DEPRECIATION>                                   146,827 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,180,569 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            793,573 
<BONDS>                                          157,461 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0 
<PREFERRED>                                    1,000,000 
<COMMON>                                           2,483 
<OTHER-SE>                                       227,052 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,180,569 
<SALES>                                        2,714,699 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   4,629 
<CGS>                                                  0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    313,097 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 215,617 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     0 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (524,085)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    0 
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0 
<CHANGES>                                              0 
<NET-INCOME>                                    (524,085)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (.02)
                                               


</TABLE>
TO: Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

FROM: Patrick Goodwin , ERG

DATE: September 30

, 2015

SUBJECT: Index for Supporting Documentation for the National Scale Immediate

Receiving Water Model [ DCN SE 04570 ]

This document serves as the index for the supporting documentation for the National Scale Immediate Receiving Water (IRW) Model , developed as part of the Environmental Assessment for the Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Source Category (EA Report), Document No. EPA

- 821

- R

- 15

- 006 (DCN SE04527) . The supporting documentation for this model includes the files listed in Table 1.

Ta ble 1. Supporting Documentation

Attachment ID Document Name Brief Description

A1 Attachment 1: Final Steam EA

IRW Model

- Water Quality Module

- Summary Table Generator (CPP)

- DCN SE04570A1 Database used to summarize the water quality module results for baseline and regulatory options. Generates the Water Quality Model Summary Tables spreadsheet. This version accounts for the CCR and CPP rulemakings.

A2 Attachment 2 : Final Steam EA

IRW Model

- Water Quality Mo dule

- Summary Tables (CPP)

- DCN SE04570A2 Spreadsheet that summarizes the water quality module results for baseline and regulatory options. This version accounts for the CCR and CPP rulemakings.
#### State *ex rel.*Schmidt v. Memorial Park Cemetery, Inc.

108,063

12/27/13

Denied

Unpublished
NO. 12-16-00282-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

IN RE:

MICHAEL KENNEDY, 

RELATOR

§

§

§

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Relator Michael Kennedy has filed a pro se petition for writ of prohibition complaining 

of the trial court’s alleged errors and misconduct in trial court cause number 29326, which he 

contends resulted in his conviction for felony theft. He also filed a motion to recuse the 

respondent in any habeas or other subsequent proceedings relating to cause number 29326. 

Relator’s theft conviction has been final for several years. See Kennedy v. State, No. 

12-11-00041-CR, 2012 WL 3201924, at *8 (Tex. App.–Tyler Aug. 8, 2012, pet. ref’d) (mem. 

op., not designated for publication) (appeal from punishment hearing after remand); Kennedy v. 

State, No. 12-08-00246-CR, 2009 WL 4829989, at *4 (Tex. App.–Tyler Dec. 16, 2009, no pet.) 

(mem. op., not designated for publication) (affirming judgment of conviction but remanding for 

new punishment hearing). Therefore, we do not have jurisdiction to address the complaints he 

raises in his petition. Moreover, a motion to recuse a trial judge must be filed with the clerk of 

the court in which the case is pending. TEX. R. CIV. P. 18(a). We have no jurisdiction to rule on 

such a motion. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 18a(f)(1), (g). Accordingly, Relator’s petition for writ of 

prohibition and his motion to recuse the respondent trial judge are dismissed for want of 

jurisdiction. 

Opinion delivered October 31, 2016.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)
COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

OCTOBER 31, 2016

NO. 12-16-00282-CR

MICHAEL KENNEDY,

Relator,

V.

HON. MARK A. CALHOON,

Respondent

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ON THIS DAY came to be heard the petition for writ of prohibition and motion 

to recuse judges filed by MICHAEL KENNEDY, who is the relator in Cause No. 29326, 

pending on the docket of the 3rd Judicial District Court of Anderson County, Texas. Said 

petition for writ of mandamus and motion to recuse judges having been filed herein on October 

7, 2016, and the same having been duly considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that 

this court does not have jurisdiction to issue a writ of prohibition in this proceeding and that it 

should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction, it is therefore CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED and 

ORDERED that the said petition for writ of mandamus and motion to recuse judges be, and the 

same are, hereby dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
# C_2018265EN.01001501.xml

| 27.7.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 265/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.7.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 265/15

---

Notification by the Netherlands of the application of Article 19(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 concerning traffic distribution rules for Schiphol airport and Lelystad Airport

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 265/06)

Pursuant to Article 19(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and the Council of 24 September 2008 on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community (1), on 12 July 2018 the Commission received notification from the Netherlands of a draft Decree establishing the Dutch traffic distribution rule between Schiphol airport and Lelystad airport.

The proposed rules, when adopted and entered into force, will distribute traffic between Schiphol and Lelystad Airport on the following basis:

| — | capacity at Lelystad Airport will be reserved for point-to-point-flights voluntarily moved from Schiphol, |
| --- | --- |

—

capacity at Lelystad Airport will be reserved for point-to-point-flights voluntarily moved from Schiphol,

| — | slots made available at Schiphol because a point-to-point-flight is moved, have to be used for transfer flights. |
| --- | --- |

—

slots made available at Schiphol because a point-to-point-flight is moved, have to be used for transfer flights.

Summarised, transfer flights are flights to destinations that at Schiphol Airport have an average transfer rate of at least 10 %. Point-to-point-flights are flights to destinations that at Schiphol Airport have an average transfer rate of less than 10 %.

The destinations that meet these criteria are specified in annexes.

The complete text can be found under the following web link:

https://ec.europa.eu/transport/modes/air/consultations/2018-schiphol-lelystad-distribution-rules_en

The Commission invites interested parties to submit their comments by 7 September 2018, to:

| Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport (Unit E4 internal market and airports) |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Office: DM24 05/84 |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| MOVE-AIR-SERVICES-REGULATION@ec.europa.eu |

Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport (Unit E4 internal market and airports)

European Commission

Office: DM24 05/84

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

MOVE-AIR-SERVICES-REGULATION@ec.europa.eu

---

(1)  OJ L 293, 31.10.2008, p. 3.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
   THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
   CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT OF SANTA
   FE FINANCIAL CORPORATION SET FORTH IN ITS FORM 10-KSB REPORT FOR THE
   SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
   REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-KSB REPORT.


</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000086759
<NAME> SANTA FE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                            62617
<SECURITIES>                                   32538045
<RECEIVABLES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               32974159
<PP&E>                                          4039083
<DEPRECIATION>                                    42287
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 44790404
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          23420159
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                        6360
<COMMON>                                         127604
<OTHER-SE>                                     14329744
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   44790404
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                4424934
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                1227863
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 3197071
<INCOME-TAX>                                    1350438
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             1433486
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                    1433486
<EPS-BASIC>                                      1.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      1.17



</TABLE>
#### State v. Huey

109,690

06/21/2016

Granted.

Unpubhshed
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 186 

Condemning the murder of Army Private William Andrew ‘‘Andy’’ Long 

and the wounding of Army Private Quinton Ezeagwula, who were shot 

outside the Army-Navy Career Center in Little Rock, Arkansas on June 

1, 2009. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 16, 2009 

Mrs. LINCOLN (for herself, Mr. PRYOR, and Mr. LIEBERMAN) submitted the 

following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Condemning the murder of Army Private William Andrew 

‘‘Andy’’ Long and the wounding of Army Private 

Quinton Ezeagwula, who were shot outside the ArmyNavy Career Center in Little Rock, Arkansas on June 

1, 2009. 

Whereas on June 1, 2009, Private William Andrew ‘‘Andy’’ 

Long, aged 23, of Conway, Arkansas, was murdered outside the Army-Navy Career Center in Little Rock, Arkansas; 

Whereas on June 1, 2009, Private Quinton Ezeagwula, aged 

18, of Jacksonville, Arkansas, was wounded by gunfire 

outside the Army-Navy Career Center in Little Rock, Arkansas; 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 186 ATS 

Whereas there are more than 1,400,000 active component 

and more than 1,200,000 reserve component members of 

the Armed Forces protecting the United States; 

Whereas there are more than 8,000 Army and Army Reserve 

recruiters and more than 7,000 Navy recruiters serving 

at more than 1,500 military recruiting stations and centers in United States, Guam, Puerto Rico, and Europe; 

Whereas the men and women of the Armed Forces risk their 

lives every day to preserve the freedoms cherished by people in the United States; 

Whereas service in the Armed Forces demands extraordinary 

sacrifices from service members and their families and 

often places service members in harm’s way; 

Whereas members of the Armed Forces are the targets of violence not only abroad but in the United States as well; 

and 

Whereas such violence is reprehensible and must not be tolerated: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) offers its condolences to the family of Pri3 vate William Andrew ‘‘Andy’’ Long; 

4 (2) hopes for a full recovery for Private 

5 Quinton Ezeagwula; 

6 (3) urges swift prosecution to the fullest extent 

7 of the law of the perpetrator or perpetrators of this 

8 senseless shooting; 

9 (4) urges the people of the United States to 

10 join the Senate in condemning acts of violence; and 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
3 

•SRES 186 ATS 

1 (5) honors the service and sacrifice of all men 

2 and women in the Armed Services who protect and 

3 defend our freedom every day. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS