Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 60 / Friday, March 28, 1997 / Notices 14885

4. There are no known regulatory

alternatives which would accomplish

the objectives of the Javits-WagnerO’Day Act (41 U.S.C. 46–48c) in

connection with the commodity

proposed for addition to the

Procurement List.

Accordingly, the following

commodity is hereby added to the

Procurement List:

Plug, Ear, Hearing Protection

6515–00–137–6345

This action does not affect current

contracts awarded prior to the effective

date of this addition or options that may

be exercised under those contracts.

E.R. Alley, Jr.,

Deputy Executive Director.

[FR Doc. 97–7930 Filed 3–27–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6353–01–P

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting

of the Nevada Advisory Committee

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to

the provisions of the rules and

regulations of the U.S. Commission on

Civil Rights, that a meeting of the

Nevada Advisory Committee to the

Commission will convene at 10:00 a.m.

and adjourn at 12:00 p.m. on April 18,

1997, at the Office of Margo Piscevich,

350 South Center Street, Suite 300,

Reno, Nevada 89509. The purpose of the

meeting is to discuss civil rights issues.

Persons desiring additional

information, or planning a presentation

to the Committee, should contact

Committee Chairperson Margo

Piscevich, 702–329–0958, or Philip

Montez, Director of the Western

Regional Office, 213–894–3437 (TDD

213–894–3435). Hearing-impaired

persons who will attend the meeting

and require the services of a sign

language interpreter should contact the

Regional Office at least five (5) working

days before the scheduled date of the

meeting.

The meeting will be conducted

pursuant to the provisions of the rules

and regulations of the Commission.

Dated at Washington, DC, March 20, 1997.

Carol-Lee Hurley,

Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.

[FR Doc. 97–7896 Filed 3–27–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6335–01–P

Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting

of the Washington Advisory

Committee

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to

the provisions of the rules and

regulations of the U.S. Commission on

Civil Rights, that a meeting of the

Washington Advisory Committee to the

Commission will convene at 9:30 a.m.

and adjourn at 12:00 p.m., on April 23,

1997, at the Westin Hotel, 1900 Fifth

Street, Seattle, Washington 98101. The

purpose of the meeting is to discuss ongoing civil rights concerns and welfare

reform monitoring.

Persons desiring additional

information, or planning a presentation

to the Committee, should contact

Committee Chairperson William

Wassmuth, 206–233–0611, or Philip

Montez, Director of the Western

Regional Office, 213–894–3437 (TDD

213–894–3435). Hearing-impaired

persons who will attend the meeting

and require the services of a sign

language interpreter should contact the

Regional Office at least five (5) working

days before the scheduled date of the

meeting.

The meeting will be conducted

pursuant to the provisions of the rules

and regulations of the Commission.

Dated at Washington, DC, March 20, 1997.

Carol-Lee Hurley,

Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.

[FR Doc. 97–7897 Filed 3–27–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6335–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A–427–812]

Calcium Aluminate Flux From France;

Amended Final Results of

Antidumping Duty Administrative

Review

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of Amended Final

Results of Antidumping Duty

Administrative Review.

SUMMARY: On February 4, 1997, the

Department of Commerce (the

Department) published the final results

of its administrative review of the

antidumping duty order on calcium

aluminate flux (CA flux) from France

(62 FR 5200). The period of review is

June 15, 1994 through May 31, 1995. On

February 18, 1997, the sole respondent,

Lafarge Aluminates, and its U.S.

subsidiary, Lafarge Calcium Aluminates,

Inc. (collectively, Lafarge) filed a timely

request that the Department correct a

ministerial error in these final results.

We are publishing this amendment to

the final results of review in accordance

with 19 CFR 353.28(c).

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 28, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Maureen McPhillips or Linda Ludwig,

AD/CVD Enforcement Group III, Office

8, Import Administration, International

Trade Administration, U.S. Department

of Commerce, 14th Street and

Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3019 or

(202) 482–3833, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Applicable Statute and Regulations

Unles otherwise stated, all citations to

the Tariff Act are references to the

provisions effective January 1, 1995, the

effective date of the amendments made

to the Tariff Act by the Uruguay Round

Agreements Act (URAA). In addition,

unless otherwise indicated, all citations

to the Department’s regulations are to

the current regulations, as amended by

the interim regulations published in the

Federal Register on May 11, 1995 (60

FR 25130).

Scope of the Review

Imports covered by this review are

shipments of CA Flux, other than white,

high purity CA flux. This product

contains by weight more than 32

percent but less than 65 percent

alumina and more than one percent

each of iron and silica.

CA flux is currently classified under

the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the

United States (HTSUS) subheading

2523.10.0000. The HTSUS is provided

for convenience and U.S. Customs’

purposes only. The written description

of the scope of this order remains

dispositive. This review covers the

period June 15, 1994 through May 31,

1995.

Ministerial Error in Final Results of

Review

After reviewing Lafarge’s allegation of

a ministerial error in the Department’s

final results of CA flux from France, we

agree that misplaced parentheses in the

computer program resulted in the

failure to multiply the per-unit U.S. cost

of manufacture (COM) by the quantity

when calculating the U.S. cost of goods

sold (COGS) to derive profit based on

the total costs, total revenues, and total

expenses for all subject merchandise

during the period of review. The intent

of the Department was clearly to include

total, not per-unit, revenue, costs and

expenses in the profit calculation as we

did for revenue, and all components of

selling expenses and movement charges.

For these amended final results we have

multiplied all components of the COGS,

including the COM, by the quantity in

order to correctly include the total

COGS in the calculation of profit.