Upward Bound Programs: Upward Bound and Upward Bound Math and Science

Request for Approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act

Supporting Statement for the New Annual Performance Report Form

A. Justification

1. Explain the circumstances that make the collection of information necessary. Identify

any legal or administrative requirements that necessitate the collection. Attach a hard 

copy of the appropriate section of each statute and regulation mandating or authorizing 

the collection of information.

The Department of Education (Department) is requesting approval of a new 

Upward Bound (UB) Annual Performance Report (APR) form to collect annual 

performance report data from projects funded by UB program grants. This APR 

reflects new UB program regulations enacted on October 26, 2010. The new 

regulations were necessitated by changes to the UB program in the Higher 

Education Opportunity Act (HEOA) of 2008. FY 2012-2013 is the first year of a 

five year grant cycle during which UB projects are required to adhere to the new 

regulations.

The UB program provides Federal financial assistance in the form of 

discretionary grants to: (a) institutions of higher education; (b) public and private 

agencies and organizations including community-based organizations with 

experience in serving disadvantaged youth; (c) secondary schools; and (d)

combinations of such institutions, agencies and organizations. The specific goals

of UB are to provide fundamental support to participants in their preparation for 

college entrance. The program provides opportunities for participants to succeed 

in their precollege performance and ultimately in their higher education pursuits. 

UB serves high school students from low-income families and high school 

students from families in which neither parent holds a bachelor's degree. The 

goal of UB is to increase the rate at which participants complete secondary

education and enroll in and graduate from institutions of postsecondary education.

The information that grantees submit in the APR allows the Department to 

annually assess each grantee's progress in meeting their project's approved goals 

and objectives. The APR data are compared with the projects’ approved 

objectives to determine the projects’ accomplishments, to make decisions 

regarding whether funding should be continued, and to award "prior experience" 

(PE) points. The regulations for this program provide for awarding up to 15 

points for prior experience (34 CR 645.32). During a competition for new grant 

awards, the PE points are added to the average of the field reader scores to arrive 

at a total score for each application. Funding recommendations and decisions are 

primarily based on the rank order of applications on the slate; therefore, 

assessment of PE points, based on data submitted in the APR, is a crucial part of 

the overall application process.
2

Further, this performance report form collects aggregate and quantifiable data 

needed to respond to the requirements of the Government Performance and 

Results Act (GPRA). In the Department of Education’s Fiscal Year 2010 Annual 

Performance Plan, the overall objective for the UB Program is to: “Increase the 

percentage of low-income, first generation students who enter and succeed in a 

program of postsecondary education.”

The Department collects information from UB grantees under the authority of 

Title IV, Part A, Subpart 2, Chapter 1, Sections 402C of the Higher Education Act 

of 1965, as amended, the program regulations in 34 CFR 645, and 34 CFR 

Sections 74.51, 75.720 and75.732 of the Education Department General 

Administrative Regulations (EDGAR). [A copy of the authorizing statute, as 

amended in 2008 as the Higher Education Opportunity Act, which is the basis for 

the current program regulations, is also attached.] 

2. Indicate how, by whom, and for what purpose the information is to be used. Except 

for a new collection, indicate the actual use the agency has made of the information 

received from the current collection.

The Department uses the data collected to (a) evaluate projects' accomplishments;

(b) determine the number of PE points to be awarded to current grantees; and (c) 

aid in compliance monitoring (i.e., to determine whether grantees are in 

compliance with the selection requirements for project participants). [34.CFR 

645.3] 

In addition, the Department uses the APRs to produce program-level data for 

annual reporting, budget submissions to OMB, and Congressional hearings,

testimonials and inquiries, and to respond to inquiries from higher education 

interest groups and the general public. 

3. Describe whether, and to what extent, the collection of information involves the use of 

automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or forms 

of information technology, e.g. permitting electronic submission of responses, and the 

basis for the decision of adopting this means of collection. Also describe any

consideration given to using technology to reduce burden.

The data collection method allows the grantees to use computerized data systems 

to collect, retrieve, and report the requested information. A Web-based software 

application has been developed for grantees to enter the data online and submit 

the entire report via the Internet. The UB projects have been submitting the annual 

performance report via the Internet since 2001.

The data collected are in the aggregate form at the program level, not data on 

individual participants; thus the reports are a low-level security risk. Nonetheless, 

the Web site is secured to ensure that the data are seen only by authorized 
3

individuals and are protected from network hackers. Further, online data edits are 

in place to ensure the accuracy and integrity of the data submitted.

4. Describe efforts to identify duplication. Show specifically why any similar 

information already available cannot be used or modified for use for the purposes 

described in Item 2 above.

The information grantees submit in their performance reports is unique to each 

project and is not collected elsewhere; therefore, no duplication exists. No other 

collection instrument is available to collect the information the Department is 

required to assess to determine grantees’ prior experience points and program 

outcomes, as described in item 2, above. The data collected in the APR are

fundamental to this program.

5. If the collection of information impacts small businesses or other small entities, 

describe any methods used to minimize burden.

This information collection does not affect small businesses or other small 

entities.

6. Describe the consequences to Federal program or policy activities if the collection is 

not conducted or is conducted less frequently, as well as any technical or legal obstacles 

to reducing burden.

The collection of performance reports is required annually. Collection of 

information on a less frequent basis is not feasible. These reports are used to 

determine if the grantee is making satisfactory progress in meeting the goals and 

objectives proposed in its initial grant application. In addition, the information is 

needed to award PE points to grantees. Without this data collection, the 

Department would not have the data to assess the PE provision of the authorizing 

statute, respond to the GPRA and other program performance and efficiency

measures, or develop improved policies for program administration.

7. Explain any special circumstances that would cause an information collection to be 

conducted in a manner:

 requiring respondents to report information to the agency more often than 

quarterly;

 requiring respondents to prepare a written response to a collection of 

information in fewer than 30 days after receipt of it;

 requiring respondents to submit more than an original and two copies of any 

document;

 requiring respondents to retain records, other than health, medical, 

government contract, grant-in-aid, or tax records for more than three years;
4

 in connection with a statistical survey, that is not designed to produce valid 

and reliable results than can be generalized to the universe of study;

 requiring the use of a statistical data classification that has not been reviewed 

and approved by OMB;

 that includes a pledge of confidentiality that is not supported by authority

established in statute or regulation, that is not supported by disclosure and 

data security policies that are consistent with the pledge, or that unnecessarily

impedes sharing of data with other agencies for compatible confidential use; 

or

 requiring respondents to submit proprietary trade secrets, or other confidential 

information unless the agency can demonstrate that it has instituted 

procedures to protect the information’s confidentiality to the extent permitted 

by law.

With one exception, no information will be collected in the manner covered under any of 

the special circumstances outlined. The exception is that respondents are required to 

retain participant records for more than three years as required under 34 CFR 74.53(b). 

In order to assess the impact of the program services on participating students’ academic 

progress, and in anticipation of the new outcome measure for UB which occurred as a 

result of the HEOA, grantees should track the academic progress of all prior-year 

participants, beginning with the 2008 high school graduating cohort, until postsecondary

completion.

8. As applicable, state that the Department has published the 60-day and 30-day Federal 

Register notices as required by 5 CFR 1320.8(d), soliciting comments on the 

information collection prior to submission to OMB. Summarize public comments 

received in response to that notice and describe actions taken by the agency in 

response to these comments. Specifically address comments received on cost and 

hour burden.

Describe efforts to consult with persons outside the agency to obtain their views on 

the availability of data, frequency of collection, the clarity of instruction and record 

keeping, disclosure, or reporting format (if any), and on the data elements to be 

recorded, disclosed, or reported.

Consultation with representatives of those from whom information is to be obtained 

or those who must compile records should occur at least once every 3 years – even if 

the collection of information activity is the same as in prior periods. There may be 

circumstances that may preclude consultation in a specific situation. These 

circumstances should be explained.

Department staff members have attended a number of state, regional, and national 

meetings at which the Department solicited informal views and comments on 

reporting requirements from grantees and other interested persons. A separate 60-
5

day Federal Register notice followed by a 30-day Federal Register notice will be 

published to solicit public comment on the new APR form.

9. Explain any decision to provide any payment or gift to respondents, other than 

remuneration of contractors or grantees.

The Department will not provide payment or gifts to respondents.

10. Describe any assurance of confidentiality provided to respondents and the basis for 

the assurance in statute, regulation, or agency policy.

No assurances of confidentiality are provided to the respondents.

11. Provide additional justification for any questions of a sensitive nature, such as sexual 

behavior and attitudes, religious beliefs, and other matters that are commonly considered 

private. The justification should include the reasons why the agency considers the 

questions necessary, the specific uses to be made of the information, the explanation to be 

given to persons from whom the information is requested, and any steps to be taken to 

obtain their consent.

The performance report form does not include questions about sexual behavior 

and attitudes, religious beliefs, or other matters that are commonly considered 

sensitive and private.

12. Provide estimates of the hour burden of the collection of information. The statement 

should:

 Indicate the number of respondents by affected public type (federal 

government, individuals or households, private sector – businesses or other 

for-profit, private sector – not-for-profit institutions, farms, state, local or 

tribal governments), frequency of response, annual hour burden, and an 

explanation of how the burden was estimated, including identification of 

burden type: recordkeeping, reporting or third party disclosure. All narrative 

should be included in item 12. Unless directed to do so, agencies should not 

conduct special surveys to obtain information on which to base hour burden 

estimates. Consultation with a sample (fewer than 10) of potential 

respondents is desirable. If the hour burden on respondents is expected to 

vary widely because of differences in activity, size, or complexity, show the 

range of estimated hour burden, and explain the reasons for the variance. 

Generally, estimates should not include burden hours for customary and usual 

business practices.

 If this request for approval covers more than one form, provide separate hour 

burden estimates for each form and aggregate the hour burdens. 

 Provide estimates of annualized cost to respondents of the hour burdens for 

collections of information, identifying and using appropriate wage rate 
6

categories. The cost of contracting out or paying outside parties for 

information collection activities should not be included here. Instead, this cost 

should be included in Item 14.

Estimated burden hours for this collection of information are 16,864 hours. We estimate 

approximately 992 respondents. The performance reports are submitted annually.

Number of 

Respondents

Estimated 

Preparation Time, 

per respondent

Total estimated 

burden hours

Public Sector 737 17 12,529

Private Sector 255 17 4,335

Total estimated 

burden hours 992 17 16,864

(Estimated burden: 16,864 hours. Total number of hours (preparation time) multiplied 

by the total number of respondents equals estimated burden hours). Preparation time 

includes 15 hours for professional staff to gather the information using computerized 

technology and 2 hours for clerical staff to enter the data into the Web-based form.

Professional staff

(992 respondents X 15 hours X $35 per hour) $520,800

Clerical staff

(992 clerical staff members X 2 hours X $18 per hour) $35,712 

Total estimated cost to all respondents $556,512

Note: As many of the respondents are project staff whose salaries are largely financed 

with Federal grant funds, the Department believes that the actual cost to respondents is 

lower than those indicated above but cannot provide an accurate estimate at this time.

13. Provide an estimate of the total annual cost burden to respondents or record keepers 

resulting from the collection of information. (Do not include the cost of any hour burden 

shown in Items 12 and 14.)

 The cost estimate should be split into two components: (a) a total capital and startup cost component (annualized over its expected useful life); and (b) a total 

operation and maintenance and purchase of services component. The estimates 

should take into account costs associated with generating, maintaining, and 

disclosing or providing the information. Include descriptions of methods used to 

estimate major cost factors including system and technology acquisition, expected 

useful life of capital equipment, the discount rate(s), and the time period over 

which costs will be incurred. Capital and start-up costs include, among other 

items, preparations for collecting information such as purchasing computers and 
7

software; monitoring, sampling, drilling and testing equipment; and acquiring and 

maintaining record storage facilities.

 If cost estimates are expected to vary widely, agencies should present ranges of 

cost burdens and explain the reasons for the variance. The cost of contracting out 

information collection services should be a part of this cost burden estimate. In 

developing cost burden estimates, agencies may consult with a sample of 

respondents (fewer than 10), utilize the 60-day pre-OMB submission public 

comment process and use existing economic or regulatory impact analysis 

associated with the rulemaking containing the information collection, as 

appropriate.

 Generally, estimates should not include purchases of equipment or services, or 

portions thereof, made: (1) prior to October 1, 1995, (2) to achieve regulatory

compliance with requirements not associated with the information collection, (3) 

for reasons other than to provide information or keep records for the government 

or (4) as part of customary and usual business or private practices. 

There are no other costs to the respondents associated with this information collection. 

Grantees are required by program regulations to collect and maintain this information. 

The costs to transmit the data electronically via the Web are customary and usual 

business practices.

14. Provide estimates of annualized cost to the Federal government. Also, provide a 

description of the method used to estimate cost, which should include quantification of 

hours, operational expenses (such as equipment, overhead, printing, and support staff), 

and any other expense that would not have been incurred without this collection of 

information. Agencies also may aggregate cost estimates from Items 12, 13, and 14 in a 

single table.

The largest portion of the Government's cost is borne directly by the Department 

of Education in designing the report form, securing clearance of the form, and 

collecting, aggregating, and disseminating the information.

Annual contract cost for development of 

APR Web application, Web-based data 

collection, Help Desk support, data 

processing, and grantee PE reports.

 $102,192

Analyses of data and preparation of 

national statistical reports. $155,000

Professional staff to update report form and 

prepare clearance package clearing 

performance report form:

$55 per hour X 120 hours

Overhead (est. at 50%): 120 times $27.50

 

$9,900
8

Professional staff to review and edit reports 

for dissemination

$55 per hour X 160 hours 

Overhead (est. at 50%): 160 times $27.50

 $13,200

Clerical staff to type, route, and copy report 

form:

$19 per hour X 15 hours 

Overhead costs (est.at 50%) 15 times 9.5

$428

Other Department staff to review and 

approve the request:

$55 per hour X 10 hours 

Overhead costs (est. at 50%) 10 times 27.50

$825

OMB review (estimated):

$55 per hour X 8 hours

Overhead costs (est. at 50%) 8 times 27.50

$660

TOTAL FEDERAL COST $282,205

15. Explain the reasons for any program changes or adjustments.

In previous years, the same APR was used for three of the TRIO programs 

(Upward Bound, Upward Bound Math and Science and Veterans Upward Bound) 

because of the similarities in the data collected for each program. However, 

statutory changes and subsequent new regulations resulted in significant 

differences in the performance measures for the UB and UBMS programs. 

Specifically, grantees must track the academic progress of UB and UBMS 

participants through postsecondary completion, and this will increase the 

reporting burden by six hours for each grantee. Therefore, this form will be used 

to collect data on UB and UBMS participants. Additionally, the final regulatory

amendments to recordkeeping requirements require that UB and UBMS grantees

document the services a student who is served by more than one TRIO or other 

federally funded program is receiving from another program during the project 

year. This change will result in an increase of two burden hours.

16. For collections of information whose results will be published, outline plans for 

tabulation and publication. Address any complex analytical techniques that will be used. 

Provide the time schedule for the entire project, including beginning and ending dates of 

the collection of information, completion of report, publication dates, and other actions.

Collected information will be analyzed annually to determine if each grantee is 

meeting its approved goals and objectives and to award PE points. Performance 

measures and efficiency measures for UB, based on data conveyed in grantees'

APRs, are disseminated in the Department's Annual Program Performance Plan. 

In addition, the Department's Web site provides data on performance and 

efficiency measures, beginning with the 2007–08 performance period, at the 

grantee level; this more detailed reporting has been made possible due to 
9

improvements in accuracy resulting from incorporating the standard objectives 

into the report form.

17. If seeking approval to not display the expiration date for OMB approval of the 

information collection, explain the reasons that display would be inappropriate.

This report form and the Web site will display the expiration date for OMB's 

approval of the information collection.

18. Explain each exception to the certification statement identified in the Certification of 

Paperwork Reduction Act.

There are no exceptions to the certification statement.

B. Collections of Information Employing Statistical Methods

This collection does not employ statistical methods.