## Mo -/6,3

STATE OF MISSOURI Matt Blunt, Governor . Doyle Childers, Director 

# DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

www .dnr.mo.gov 

## FEB 2 2 2007 Mr . John B

. Askew Regional Administrator U .S. EPA, Region VII 901 North Fifth Street Kansas City, KS 66101 

# RECEIVED FEB 27 2007 

# APDB Dear Mr . Askew

: The Missouri Air Conservation Commission has recently revised or promulgated the following air quality plan(s) contained in the Missouri State Implementation Plan (SIP) . The following is enclosed for your review : Plan for Implementation, Maintenance and Enforcement ofNational Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) This state of Missouri Plan for Implementation, Maintenance and Enforcement of National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) has been written to fulfill the requirements of Section 110of the Federal CleanAir Act Amendments (CAAA) of 1990 . Section 110 of the CAAA requires that each state submit to the Administrator of the U

.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) a plan for the implementation, maintenance and enforcement of NAAQS in every air quality region within the state. Any changes that are necessary as a result ofadditional guidance the EPA publishes after this submittal will be covered as a separate revision at a later date. In the plan, beginning on page 12, Missouri has addressed EPA's finding made in April 2005 that states failed to make statutorily required plan submissions addressing 110 (a)(2)(D)(i) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) pertaining to interstate transport . 0

### Mr . John B. Askew

Page Two The commission adopted the enclosed plan action(s) on February 1, 2007 after considering comments received at public hearing. The commission has full legal authority to develop the Missouri State Implementation Plan pursuant to Section 643.050 of the Missouri Air Conservation Law . The state followed all applicable administrative procedures in proposing and adopting the plan action(s) . Enclosed are the required SIP submittal elements for determination of plan completeness per 40 CFRPart 51, Appendix V . The Missouri Department of Natural Resources requests that the Environmental Protection Agency amend the SIP to include the new plan submitted. Thank you for your attention to this matter . If you have any questions regarding this submittal, please contact David J . Lamb, Missouri Department ofNatural Resources' Air Pollution Control Program at P .O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102 or by phone at (573) 751-4817. Sincerely, AIRPOLLUTION CONTROL PROGRAM

es L. Kavanaugh irector JLK:pms Enclosures: Copy of plan Copy ofcommission signature page certifying Missouri Air Conservation Commission adoption Copy of technical support documentation for plan (if applicable) Copies of public hearing newspaper notices Copy of public hearing transcript introductory statement Copy of public comments and responses 

### c: Missouri Air Conservation Commission

## State of Missouri Plan for Implementation, Maintenance and Enforcement of National Ambient Air Quality Standards Missouri Air Conservation Commission Adopted: February 1, 2007

Department of Natural Resources Air and Land Protection Division Air Pollution Control Program

P .O . Box 176 1659 East ElmStreet Jefferson City, Missouri 65102 Telephone (573) 751-4817

## Table of Contents

Acknowledgments. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. 4 1 .0 Executive Summary. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.0 Time Line History. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 2.1 Ozone. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 2.2 Particulate Matter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 2.2.1 Historical Particulate Matter Monitoring Network. . . . . . . . . 8 2.2.2 Historical Analysis ofAir Quality Data. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 2 .3 Long Range Transport. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 

### 3.0 All State Area Designations, (including out-state, Springfield/Greene County, the Kansas City 8-Hour Ozone Maintenance Area and the St. Louis 8-Hour Ozone Nonattainment and Particulate Matter 2.5 Nonattainment areas) .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 3.1 All State Area Designations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 3.2 Out-State Design Values . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 4 .0 Administrative Requirements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 4.1 Section 110 of the CAAA of 1990 Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 4.2 Legal Authority. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 4 .3 Commitment Letter to Revise Plans. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 4 .4 Public Hearing Notice and Certification. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 4 .5 Comments, Responses, and Explanations of Change. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 4 .6 Missouri Air Conservation Commission Adoption Certification. . . . . . . . 18 5 .0 Quality Assurance Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 5.1 Air Quality Analysis for 2005Air Quality (9/30/05) . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 5.2 Ozone and Particulate Matter 2.5 Monitoring Network. . . . . . . . . 19 Missouri Air Quality Monitors Locations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 6 .0 List of Appendices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 6 .1 Appendix A Missouri Air Law . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 6 .2 Appendix B Commitment Letter to Revise Plans. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 6 .3 Appendix C Effective State Rules and Forms. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 6 .4 Appendix D November 2006 Public Hearing Notice and Certification of Publication of the of the Notice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 6 .5 Appendix E December 7, 2006 Public Hearing Comments and Responses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 6 .6 Appendix F MACCAdoption Certification. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 466 .7 Appendix G 8-Hour Ozone and Particulate Matter 2.5 Area Designations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 6 .8 Appendix H Missouri Air Quality Monitors Data for Years 2003, 2004 and 2005. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 6 .9 Appendix I Missouri Air Quality Monitors Locations for Oxides of Nitrogen, Particulate Matter, Ozone and Oxides of Sulfur as of 9/30/05 and Missouri State Map Air Monitor Locations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 6 .10 Appendix J Clean Air Interstate Rules and Clean Air Mercury Rule MACCAdoption Certification. . . . . . . 68

## ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The information, analysis and documentation contained in this plan represents the cooperative effort between the United States Environmental Protection Agency (Region VII) and the Missouri Department of Natural

Resources' Air Pollution Control Program . The Missouri Department of Natural Resources' Air Pollution Control Programgratefully acknowledges participants' input.

## 1 .0 Executive Summary This state of Missouri Plan for Implementation, Maintenance and Enforcement of National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) has been written to fulfill the requirements of Section 110of the Federal Clean Air Act Amendments (CAAA) of 1990 . Section 110 ofthe CAAA requires that each state submit to the Administrator of the U .S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) a plan for the implementation, maintenance and enforcement of NAAQS in every air quality region within the state. The NAAQSwas revised for the new 8-hour ozone primary and secondary standards proposed by EPA on July 18, 1997 and finalized on April 30, 2004. The revised 8-hour ozone standards require that revised state plans be submitted within three (3) years after the rule's effective date (June 15, 2007), and after promulgation of the NAAQS for anypollutant. The NAAQS for the new PM2 .5 primary and secondary standards was proposed by EPA on July 18, 1997 and finalized on January 5, 2005. The new PM2,5 standards require that revised state plans be submitted within three (3) years after the rule's effective date (April 5, 2008) and after promulgation of NAAQS for any pollutant. Environmental Defense and the American Lung Association filed suit against EPAalleging that EPA unreasonably delayed making determinations as to whether each state had submitted the remaining state implementation plan revisions required by CAAsection 110 (a)(2) for implementation, maintenance and enforcement of the respective 1997 NAAQS. AConsent Decree was agreed to and signed that declared that State Implementation Plan (SIP) due dates are now Decemberl5, 2007 for ozone and October 5, 2008 for PM2 .5 thus extending the three (3) year SIP submittal requirements. The content of this combined plan has been developed to demonstrate the continued attainment ofprimary and secondary standards for 8-hour ozone and for PM2,5 fromthe regulations for preparation, adoption and submittal of implementation plans codified in the Congressional Federal Record (CFR) at 40 CFRpart 51, Appendix V, "Criteria for Determiningthe Completeness ofPlan Submissions" . For the purpose of this plan, the state ofMissouri consists of Out-state areas, the Kansas City metropolitan area and the St . Louis metropolitan area. These areas and designations are listed at 40 CFRpart 81 .326, "Designation of Areas for Air Quality Planning Purposes - Missouri" . This plan is for the entire state of Missouri . However, the Kansas City metropolitan area 8-hour ozonemaintenance plan and the St . Louis metropolitanarea 8-hour ozone and PM2 .5 nonattainment plans are being addressed separately fromthis document . The state of Missouri acknowledges its responsibilities related to section 110(a) of the CAAAand reaffirms that the state has full authority under section I 10(a) to implement the revised NAAQS. Under the current SIP and Missouri statute (Appendix A), the state has the necessary infrastructure, resources and general authority to address the revised ozone and PMIO standards and the new PM2,5 standards. 

## 2.0 Time Line History 2 .1 Ozone The U .S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) established in 1971 a national primary and secondary maximum1-hour National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) ozone standard of 0 .08 parts per million (ppm) that is not to be exceeded more than once per year . (See Federal Register, April 30, 1971, Volume 36, Number 84) . The 1972 Kansas City and Out-state state implementation plan (SIP) stated that Set II Pollutant Considerations (carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxides (NOX), hydrocarbon oxides (HC-OX)) that because the levels of CO, NOX, photochemical oxidants and hydrocarbons are generally well below

the levels established as the secondary standards for these pollutants. It should be noted that control strategies for regions classified Priority III for any pollutant are not required by the federal government . (Set I Pollutants are particulate matter (PM) and sulfur oxides (SOX) . Table I lists the final Air Quality Control Region (AQCR) Priority Classes for Out-state Missouri . TABLE I (AQCR) PM SOx CO NOx HC-Ox SW Intrastate I III III III III SE Intrastate III III III III III Northern Intrastate II III III III III Priority I Regions were required to submit:" air quality and emissions data in detail ; " a control strategy that was tested and found to be appropriate and adequate; " a comprehensive contingency plan for the prevention of air pollution emergency episodes; and finally " an air quality surveillance network. Priority II Regions are intermediate in scope and, therefore, fewer control strategies are required. Control strategies for regions classified as Priority III for any pollutant are not required. On February 8,1979, EPArevised the national primary and secondary maximum1-hour ozone air quality standard to 0 .12 ppm, with a 1-hour average not to be exceeded more than one dayper year. (See Federal Register, February 8, 1979, Volume 44, Page 8202) . On July 18,1997, EPArevised the 1-hour ozone air quality standard for ozone by replacing the 1979 standard with an 8-hour standard set at 0 .08 ppm(See Federal Register, July 18, 1997, Volume 62, Number 138) . Three states and dozens of industry plaintiffs quickly challenged the new standards. EPA announced that the 1-hour ozone standard will no longer apply to an area one year after the effective date of the designation of that area for the 8-hour ozone air quality standard. (See Federal Register, April 30, 2004, Volume 69, Number 84) . EPArevoked the 1-hour ozone air quality standards on June 15, 2005, but the 1-hour ozone maintenance plan requirements will remain enforceable as part of the approved SIPuntil such time as EPA approves an 8-hour SIP . Out-state Missouri has always been in attainment for ozone. 2 .2 Particulate Matter EPA also promulgated PM total suspended particulate (TSP) NAAQS in 1971 which set the primary standard (the level where human health is affected) at 260 Rg/m3 for a 24-hour average and 75 ~Ig/m3 for an annual geometric mean. EPA set the secondary standard (the level where the public's welfare, other than health, such as property damage is affected) at 150 [Ig/m3 for a 24-hour average. The Clean Air Act requires EPAto review the standards every five years as new data becomes available, and revise any standard asjustified. On July 1, 1987, after extensive reviewand public comment covering a nine year period, EPApublished it's final decision in the Federal Register concerning a revision to the particulate matter standard, which became effective July 31, 1987. The revisions:" replaced the pollutant indicator for the standard from TSP to PMIO ; " set the primary, health related 24-hour standard to 150 gg/m3 ; " set the primary annual standard to 50gg/m3; and 

### " set the secondary standards equal to the primary standards. 2.2.1 Historical Particulate Matter Monitoring Network. The original monitoring network was set up at the following locations: 1 . St . Louis, MO " Eight monitors in the Missouri portion of the St. Louis metropolitan area 2 . Kansas City, MO " Five monitors in the Missouri portion ofthe Kansas City metropolitan area 3. Springfield, MO " Three monitors 4 . St. Joseph, MO " One monitor 5 . Other monitors in the state " Hannibal, MO " Mexico, MO

; " Columbia, MO " Herculaneum, MO

; and " Mark Twain State Park in Monroe County. 2 .2.2 Historical Analysis ofAir Quality Data Data for 1985, 1986 and 1987 showed no violations in the three-year-period ofthe PM10 NAAQS. The data did showexceedances ofthe standards as follows: " The monitor at St. Joseph had an annual mean value of 51 .7 ~tg/m3 (exceeding 50) in 1985. " The monitor in Mexico had a 24-hr exceedance of 164 [Ig/m3 (exceeding 150) on Aug. 1, 1987 The above exceedances were not violations of the standards for the following reasons: 1 . The annual exceedance in St . Joseph in 1985 occurred before a change in monitoring equipment operation for PM10 was initiated by EPAin mid1986 . Following this change, lower values for PM10 (about 20 percent less) were being taken than beforethe change at the same monitoring sites, and with that difference applied at the St . Joseph monitor for the 1985 exceedance, the adjusted value was below the annual standard. 2. The 24-hour exceedance in Mexico was the only one at that monitor during that calendar year . The standard allows one 24-hour exceedance per year at any one monitored sitewithout being in violation of the standard. On July 18, 1997, EPArevised the particulate matter standards to include a new national primary and secondary ambient air quality standard for PM2,5 (See Federal Register, July 18, 1997, Volume 62, Page 38711, Notices as amended at Federal Register July 30, 2004 Vol . 69. Page 45595) . Out-state Missouri has always been in attainment for the PM

standards except for the exceedances addressed by the Columbia Particulate Matter SIP (1980), Mexico Particulate Matter SIP (1979) and St . Joseph Particulate Matter SIP (1980) . There have also been exceedances by point sources at times that have been addressed by consent agreements and through permit modifications. The charcoal industry has been regulated by rule 10 CRS 10-6.330 "Restriction of Emissions from Batch-Type Charcoal Kilns" because of excess PM and opacity violations in the past . 2.3 Long Range Transport During the mid-1990's, the EPA, states, and local agencies began to evaluate the impacts of long range transport of emissions on nonattainment areas for NAAQS. This evaluation led to EPA's promulgation of a SIP call to reduce nitrogen oxide emissions (NOX SIP Call) . Missouri was not included in the first phase ofthe NOX SIP Call . However, Missouri developed a NOXtransport regulation, 10 CSR 10-6.350 "Emission Limitations and Emissions Trading of Oxides of Nitrogen" . This regulation was developed to fulfill the state's requirements under the EPA's 1-hour ozone attainment date extension policy as it applies to the St . Louis ozone nonattainment area. This regulation achieved NO,, emission reductions throughout the state of Missouri by placing an emissionrate limit on electric generating units and established a rate based trading program, similar to EPA's Acid Rain Program . EPApromulgated Phase Il of the NO, SIP Call in 2004. The SIP call required Missouri to reduce NO,, emissions fromelectric generating units, cement kilns, industrial boilers, and stationary internal combustion engines. Missouri developed regulations to implement the requirements of EPA's NO, SIP call . These regulations became effective in October of 2005 and were approved by the EPAon Aug . 15, 2006. In March of2005, EPApromulgated the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) . This rule was designed to reduce NO,, and sulfur dioxide emissions fromaffected states to levels that would not significantly impact any neighboring states' abilityto attain or maintain the NAAQS for ozone and fine particulate . This rule does apply to Missouri . Missouri began holding workgroup meetings to implement this rule in August of 2005 and is working toward rule development in response to CAIR. EPA finalized a Federal Implementation Plan for CAIR in April of 2006 . This plan will remain in place until EPAapproves a state plan. 

## 3.0 All State Area Designations, (including out-state, Springfield/Greene County, Kansas City 8-Hour Ozone Maintenance Area and the St. Louis 8-Hour Ozone Nonattainment and Particulate Matter 2.5 nonattainment area) 3.1 All State Area Designations All State Area Designations are listed in Appendix G 3.2 Out State Design Values Out-State Design Values are listed in Appendix H 

## 4.0 Administrative Requirements 4 .1 Section 110: Requirements of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990This section of the plan provides an explanation of how each applicable Clean Air Act (CAA) requirement is attained. Implementation Plans Requirements of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990

. Section 110

. Implementation Plans (a)(1) Each state shall, after reasonable notice andpublic hearings, adopt and submit to the Administrator, within 3years (or such shorterperiod as the Administrator mayprescribe) after thepromulgation ofa national primary ambient air quality standard (or any revision thereoj) under section 109

for any airpollutant, aplan whichprovidesfor implementation, maintenance, andenforcement ofsuchprimary standard in each air quality control region (or portion thereoj) within such state . In addition, such state shall adopt andsubmit to theAdministrator (either as a part ofa plan submitted under the preceding sentence or separately) within 3years (orsuch shorter period as theAdministrator mayprescribe) after the promulgation ofa national ambient air quality secondary standard (or revision thereofi, aplan whichprovidesfor implementation, maintenance, and enforcement ofsuch secondary standard in each air quality control region (or portion thereof) within such state. Unless a separate public hearing is provided, each state shall consider its plan implementing such secondary standard at the hearing required by thefirst sentence ofthisparagraph. The 1972 Kansas City and out state plan was written to fulfill the original national ambient air quality standards. As mentioned in the Executive Summary of this document, this new state of Missouri plan has been written to fulfill the CAAsection 110(a)(1) requirements by including revisions to include the new 8-hour ozone and PM2

.5 primary and secondary standards. (2) Each implementation plan submitted by a state under this Act shall be adopted by the state after reasonable notice andpublic hearing . Each such plan shall- (A) include enforceable emission limitations and other control measures, means, or techniques (including economic incentives such asfees, marketablepermits, and auctions ofemissions rights), as well as schedules and timetablesfor compliance, as may be necessary or appropriate to meet the applicable requirements of this Act; State rule 10 CSR 10-6.010 "Ambient Air Quality Standards" and facilities individual rules, permits and consent agreements fulfill the requirements of 110(a)(2)(A) . -11-(2)(B) providefor establishment andoperation ofappropriate devices, methods, systems, andprocedures necessary to - (i) monitor, compile, andanalyze data on ambient air quality, and (ii) upon request, make such data available to the Administrator; The department's Air Pollution Control Program's Air Quality Analysis Section was created to and is maintained to fulfill the requirements of 110(a)(2)(B) . (2)(C) include a programto providefor the enforcement ofthe measures described in subparagraph (A), and regulation of the modification and construction ofany stationary source within the areas covered by theplan as necessary to assure that national ambient air quality standards are achieved, including a permit program as required in parts C

and D ; The department's Air Pollution Control Program's Enforcement Section and Permits Section was created and is maintained to fulfill the requirements of 110(a)(2)(C) . (2)(D) contain adequate provisions - (i) prohibiting, consistent with theprovisions ofthis title, any source or other type ofemissions activity within the state fromemitting any airpollutant in amounts which will - (I) contribute significantly to nonattainment in, or interfere with maintenance by, any otherstate with respect to any such national primary or secondary ambient air quality standard, or (II) interfere with measures required to be included in the applicable implementation planfor any other state underpart Cto prevent significant deterioration ofair quality or to protect visibility, (III) insuring compliance with the applicable requirements ofsections 126and 115 (relating to interstate and internationalpollution abatement) ; To fulfill the requirements of section 110 (a)(2)(D), several actions have been implemented over time. Visibility Protection EPAhas made no determination that emissions fromany state interfere with 1980 visibility plan measures required to be included in a plan to address reasonably attributable visibility impairment . EPAis not aware of any certification of existing reasonably attributable impairment of visibility by a Federal Land Manager that has not already been resolved. -12-Based on this information, no source in Missouri emits pollutants that interfere with measures included in visibility plans under 1980 regulations. At this time, Missouri's current nonattainment/maintenance plans for the 8-hour ozone and PM2

.5 NAAQS are under development. It is expected that these plans will benefit visibility protected areas in Missouri and other neighboring states. This is primarily due to the inclusion of NOXand SOZ controls under the Clean Air Interstate Rule and NOX SIP call regulations. Also, Missouri is working with the Central States Regional Air Partnership (CENRAP) regional planning organization in development of a regional haze plan that is due to be submitted to EPADecember 2007 . This on-going regional haze plan development process is intended to address incoming visibility impairing pollutants fromsources in other states and Missouri source contribution on Missouri Class I areas as well as other states' protected areas. Prevention of Significant Deterioration All major sources located in attainment areas in the State of Missouri are currently subject to Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) permitting under state rule 10 CSR 10-6.060 Construction Permits Required section (8) . Major sources located in nonattainment areas are currently regulated under a Nonattainment New Source Review

(NNSR) permitting program

under state rule 10 CSR 10-6.060 Construction Permits Required section (7) . Missouri believes that the current rule 10 CSR 10-6.060 Construction Permits Required rule meets the requirements ofthe Phase Il ozone implementation rule as St . Louis is classified as a moderate ozone nonattainment area. Missouri will followEPA's most current policy on the implementation of all PSDand NNSRregulations as they relate to the implementation ofthe NAAQS. Missouri will also adopt EPA's revised regulations implementing therevisions to the NAAQS as expeditiously as possible. This will include the adoption of permitting requirements into the state permitting rules as soon as possible. Prevention of Significant Contribution Several rules have been implemented and are in development to prevent Missouri emissions fromsignificantly contributing to nonattainment in other states or interfering with maintenance in other states with respect to any such national primary or secondary ambient air quality standard. Four (4) rules have been implemented to establish a NOXemissions trading programfor the state of Missouri ; establish an emission budget for large electric generating units and non-electric generating boilers; establish NOXcontrol equipment and NO,, emission levels for cement kilns; and establish emission levels for large stationary internal combustion engines. -13-These four (4) state rules are 10 CSR 10-6.350 "Emission Limitations and Emissions Trading of Oxides ofNitrogen" ; 10 CSR 10-6.360 "Control of NO, Emissions From

Electric Generating Units and Non-Electric Generating Boilers" ; 10 CSR 10-6.380 "Control of NOXEmissions From Portland Cement Kilns" ; and 10 CSR 10-6.390 "Control of NOX Emissions FromLarge Stationary Internal Combustion Engines" . Four (4) additional rules are in development to address a Clean Air Interstate RuleAnnual NOXTrading Program ; a Clean Air Interstate Rule Seasonal NOXTrading Program ; a Clean Air Interstate Rule S02Trading Program ; and Control of Mercury Emissions FromElectric Generating Units. (See Appendix J for Clean Air Interstate Rules and Clean Air Mercury Rule MACCAdoption Certifications) . (2)(E) provide (i) necessary assurances that the state (or, except where the Administrator deems inappropriate, thegeneralpurpose local government or governments, or a regional agency designated by the state or general purpose local governmentsforsuch purpose) will have adequate personnel, funding, and authority under state (and, as appropriate, local) law to carry outsuch implementation plan (and is notprohibited by any provision ofFederal or state law fromcarrying out such implementation plan orportion thereoj), (ii) requirements that the state comply with the requirements respecting state boards undersection 128, and (iii) necessary assurances that, where thestate has relied on a local or regional government, agency, or instrumentalityfor the implementation of anyplan provision, the state has responsibilityfor ensuring adequate implementation ofsuch plan provision; The Missouri Air Conservation Law (643.079, RSMo) requires the Missouri Air Conservation Commission to set an annual air pollution emission fee to fund the reasonable cost of administering this law . Section 643, RSMo also provides the authority necessary to carry out the state implementation plan requirements. The department's Air Pollution Control Programalso has signed state and local agreements with St Louis City, St . Louis County, Kansas City and Springfield/and with the surrounding states fulfills therequirements of 110(a)(2)(E) . (2)(F) require, as may be prescribed by the Administrator - (i) the installation, maintenance, andreplacement of equipment, and the implementation ofother necessary steps, by owners or operators ofstationary sources to monitor emissionsfromsuch sources, (ii) periodic reports on the nature andamounts ofemissions and emissions-related datafromsuch sources, and (iii) correlation ofsuch reports by the State agency with any emission limitations or standards establishedpursuant to

-14-thisAct, which reports shall be available at reasonable timesfor public inspection; State rule requirements fulfill the requirements of 110(a)(2)(F) . (2)(G) providefor authority comparable to that in section 303and adequate contingency plans to implement such authority; State rulel0 CSR 10-6.130 "Controlling Emissions During Episodes of High Air Pollution Potential" and contingency elements in the St . Louis nonattainment SIP and Kansas City maintenance SIP fulfill the requirements of 110(a)(2)(G) . (2)(H) providefor revision ofsuch plan - (i) from

time to time as may be necessary to take account of revisions ofsuch national primary or secondary ambient air quality standard or the availability ofimproved or more expeditious methods ofattainingsuch standard, and (ii) except as provided in paragraph (3)(C), whenever the Administratorfinds on the basis ofinformation available to theAdministrator that theplan is substantially inadequate to attain the national ambientair quality standard which it implements or to otherwise comply with any additional requirements established under this Act; Affirmation letter dated September 27, 2004 to Chief, Air Planning and Development Branch, U .S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region VII regarding the state ofMissouri's responsibilities related to section 110(a) of the Clean AirAct. This letter reaffirms that we have full authority under section 110(a) to implement the revised National Ambient Air Quality Standards and fulfills the requirements of 110(a)(2)(H) . (2)(1) in the case ofa plan orplan revision for an area designated as a nonattainment area, meet the applicable requirements of part D(relating to nonattainment areas) ; Affirmation letter dated September 27, 2004 to Chief, Air Planning and Development Branch, U .S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region VII regarding the state of Missouri's responsibilities related to section 110(a) of the Clean Air Act. This letter reaffirms that we have full authority under section 110(a) to implement the revised National Ambient Air Quality Standards and fulfills the requirements of 110(a)(2)(I) . (2)(J) meet the applicable requirements ofsection 121 (relating to consultation), section 127 (relating to public notification), andpart C

-15-(relating to prevention ofsignificant deterioration ofair quality and visibility protection) ; The department's Air Pollution Control Program's rulemaking process public participation fulfills the requirements of 110(a)(2)(J) . (2)(K) providefor - (i) theperformance ofsuch air quality modeling as the Administrator mayprescribefor the purpose ofpredicting the effect on ambient air quality ofany emissions ofany air pollutantfor which the Administrator has established a national ambient airquality standard, and (ii) the submission, upon request, ofdata related to such air quality modeling to the Administrator; The department's Air Pollution Control Program's Air Quality Analysis Section was created and is maintained to fulfill the requirements of 110(a)(2)(K) . (2)(L) require the owner or operator ofeach major stationary source to pay to thepermitting authority, as a condition ofany permit required under this Act, a fee sufficient to cover - (i) the reasonable costs ofreviewing and acting upon any applicationfor such apermit, and (ii) ifthe owner or operator receives a permitfor such source, the reasonable costs ofimplementing and enforcing the terms and conditions ofany such permit (not including any court costs or other costs associated with any enforcement action), until suchfee requirement is superseded with respect to such sources by the Administrator's approval ofafeeprogramunder title V ; The department's Air Pollution Control Program's Permits Section and rules 10 CSR 10-6.060 Construction Permits Required, 10 CSR 10-6.061 Construction Permit Exemptions, 10 CSR 10-6.062 Construction Permits by Rule and 10 CSR 10-6.065 Operating Permits fulfills the requirements of 110(a)(2)(L) . (2)(M) providefor consultation andparticipation by localpolitical subdivisions affected by theplan. The department's Air Pollution Control Program's signed State and Local Agreements with St Louis City, St. Louis County, Kansas City and Springfield/Greene as well as participation with the Mid-America Regional Council ; East-West Gateway Coordinating Council ; the St . -16-Louis East-West Gateway Council of Governments and rulemaking process public participation fulfills the requirements of 110(a)(2)(M) . 4.2 Legal Authority The Missouri Air Conservation Commission (MACC) is granted legal authority to develop and implement regulations regarding air pollution under section 643.050 of the Revised Statutes ofMissouri (RSMo) . Under the current SIPand Missouri statutes, the state has the necessary infrastructure, resources and general authority to address the new 8-hour ozone airquality and PM2 .5 standards. The specific powers and duties of the state are outlined in section 643.050, RSMo "Powers and Duties of the Commission", 643.055, RSMo "Commission May Adopt Rules for Compliance with Federal Law", and 643.060, RSMo "Powers and Duties ofDirector" . The MACC is the air pollution control agency ofthe state and has the authority, pursuant to chapter 536, RSMo "Administrative Procedure and Review", to promulgate rules and regulations to establish standards and guidelines to ensure that the State of Missouri is in compliance with the provisions of the federal Clean Air Act. These statutes grant the MACC and the director direct authority to implement any federal standards through state rules and procedures. A copy of the Missouri Air Conservation Law (Appendix A) that pertains to the powers and duties of the commission and the director are in sections 643.010-643.070, RSMo. Missouri's complete air law is in sections 643.010-643.620, RSMo. 4 .3 Commitment to Revise Plans An affirmation letter, (Appendix B), dated Sept . 27, 2004 to Chief, Air Planning and Development Branch, U .S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region VII regarding the state ofMissouri's responsibilities related to section 110(a) ofthe Clean Air Act. This letter reaffirms that we have full authority under section 110(a) to implement the revised National Ambient Air Quality Standards. 4.4 Public Hearing Notice and Certification The Missouri Department ofNatural Resources' Air Pollution Control Programis required to announce apublic hearing at least 30 days prior to holding such hearing. This was accomplished by announcements submitted to newspapers at least 30 days prior to the public hearing which occurred on December 7, 2006 . The public hearing notice along with -17-certification ofpublication ofthe public notice for this plan amendment is in Appendix D

. 4.5 Comments, Responses and Explanations of Change The department's Air Pollution Control Program's responses to comments received during the open public comment period on this plan are in Appendix E. The comment period was open for seven (7) days after the Public Hearing on December 7, 2006 . The department's Air Pollution Control Programis required to respond to all comments. 4.6 Missouri Air Conservation Commission Adoption Certification The MACCadoption certification to demonstrate approval by the commission ofthe state implementation plan amendment is in Appendix F. 

## 5.0 Quality Assurance Program The department's Air Pollution Control Program quality assures all data in accordance with 40 CFR 58.10and the department's Air Pollution Control Programstandard operating procedures for operating the ambient monitoring networks and validating the data. The department's Air Pollution Control Program records the data in the U .S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) Aerometric Information Retrieval System(AIRS) database, which is available to the public. 5.1 Air Quality Analysis for 2005Air Quality (9/30/05) The following information is for the ambient air monitors operated by all reporting organizations including state, local, and industry which is updated to the EPA AIRS database for 2005. The total number of exceedances of the NAAQS to date in 2005 are summarized below : " Ozone All areas in the state are in compliance with the 1-hour ozone air quality standard. St . Louis is classified as a moderate non-attainment area for the 8-hour standard. There were 98 exceedances of the 8-hour ozone air quality standard in 2005. Two sites, West Alton and Orchard Farm, are in violation for 2003 to 2005. 0 PMZ .sAll Missouri sites now meet both the 24-hour and annual standards. The St . Louis area remains in violation for 2002 to 2004 due to two Illinois sites, Granite City (16.9 Rg/m3) and East St. Louis (15.4 p,g/m3), that are over the annual standard. " Data Completeness Data completeness for Missouri is typically excellent, averaging percentages in the high 90s. Data completeness for the first three calendar quarters was 97%, 97%, and 96% . The Ladue PM2,5 monitor lacked the most complete data at 57%in the second quarter and 36% in the third due to mechanical problems. Only one other monitor has a quarter less than 75%, the PM2

.5 sampler at the University of Missouri, Kansas City. This, however, was attributable to operator error. Missouri Air Quality Monitor Data for Years 2003, 2004 and 2005 See Appendix H 5 .2 Ozone and Particulate Matter 2 .5 Monitoring Network " Missouri Air Quality Monitors Locations See Appendix I 

## 6 .0 List ofAppendices 6 .1 Appendix A Missouri Air Law . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 6 .2 Appendix B Commitment Letter to Revise Plans. . . . . . 22 6 .3 Appendix C Effective State Rules and Forms. . . . . . . . . . . . 26 6 .4 Appendix D December 7, 2006 Public Hearing Notice and Certification of Publication of the of the Notice. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 6 .5 Appendix E December 7, 2006 Public Hearing Comments and Responses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 6 .6 Appendix F MACCAdoption Certification. . . . . . . . . . . . 46 6 .7 Appendix G 8-Hour Ozone and Particulate Matter 2.5 Area Designations. . . . . . . . . . . . 48 -19-6 .8 Appendix H Missouri Air Quality Monitor Data for Years 2003, 2004 and 2005. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 6 .9 Appendix I Missouri Air Quality Monitors Locations for Oxides of Nitrogen, Particulate Matter, Ozone and 

### Oxides of Sulfur as of 9/30/05. . . . . . . . . 60 6 .10 Appendix J Clean Air Interstate Rules and Clean Air Mercury Rule MACCAdoption Certification. . . . . . . . . . 68

## APPENDIXA

6.1 Appendix A MISSOURI AIRCONSERVATION LAW The Missouri Air Conservation Law is available for viewing at; http ://www

.moga.mo.gov/statutes/chapters/chap643.htm

## APPENDIX B

6 .2 Appendix B Commitment Letter to Revise Plans Affirmation letter dated September 27, 2004 to Chief, Air Planning and Development Branch, U .S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region V11 regarding the state of Missouri's responsibilities related to section 110(a) of the Clean Air Act. This letter reaffirms that we have full authority under section 110(a) to implement the revised National Ambient Air Quality Standards.Bob Holden, Governor . Stephen M . Mahfood, Director 

# T OF NATURAL RESOURCES

www dnr.mo.gov : ;s_ro 

## fil

## l`,`.': SEP 2 7 2004 , Mr. JoshuaA

. Tapp Chief, Air Planning and Development Branch EPA Region VII 901 North 5"Street Kansas City, KS 66101 Dear Mr :Tapp: This letter is in response to your correspondence of April 29, 2004, to Ms. LeanneJ. Tippett regarding the stateofMissouri's responsibilities related to section 110(a) oftheClean AirAct. This letter reaffirms that we have full authority under section 110(a) to implement the revised National AmbientAir QualityStandards (NAAQS) . Pursuant to the revisedand new NAAQSforozone andparticulatematter (PM), we have evaluated therules in our currentstateimplementation plan (SIP) to determine ifanyrevisions are necessary. .Under the current SIP andMissouri statute, the state has thenecessary infrastructure and general authority to address therevised ozone and PM,o standards andthe new PM2 .5 standard. Specifically, 643.050, RSMo Powers and Duties ofthe Commission, 643.055, RSMo Commission MayAdopt Rules forCompliance with Federal Law, and 643.060, RSMo Powers and Duties ofDirector grantthe Missouri AirConservation Commission andtheDirector ofthe Department ofNatural Resources direct authority to implement any federal standards through staterules andprocedures. . 

### We have evaluated our current SIP forsection 110 ("110SIP") with regards to the new standards. The current SIP can beamended to implement the revised ozone and new PM1o and PM2 .5 emissions inventories, monitoring networks, and modeling. All control measures under theold PM1o standard have been implemented and continuetobe enforced except rule 10CSR 10-6.330 Restriction of Emissions fromBatch-Type Charcoal Kilns. This rule was adopted on March 26, 1998, andwas effective on July 30, 1998 . The phasing in ofcontrol of the kilnswill be finalized in 2005

. Missouri is committed to revising the followingstaterulesforozone and particulate matter by the June 15, 2007 deadline as necessaryso that they reflect the revised ozone andparticulate 

### standards. Integrity andexcellence in allwe do iA -,7-Natural' Recyded Paw Resources -23-Mr.Joshua A: Tapp Page Two 1. 10 CSR10-6.010AmbientAirQualityStandards. " Update Table to reflect new revisions to the NAAQS. 2 . 10CSR 10-6.020Definitions and Common Reference Tables. " Add PMZSdefinition. " Update Table 1 to include PM2 .5 and to reflect new

revisions to the NAAQS. 3. 10 CSR 10-6

.030 Sampling Methods for Air Pollution Sources. " Update 6

.030(5), Particulate Emissions, to include a better explanation of PM2 .5 monitoring. 4 . 10 CSR10-6

.040 Reference Methods. " Update 6

.040(4) to include the new PM2,5 standard. 5. 10 CSR10-6.060 Construction Permits Required. " Update Table6

.060(11)(A) to include PM2

.5 . " Update Table6

.060 (11)(B) in include PM2,5ifrequired. " Update Table6

.060(11)(D) to include PMZ,5 . " Update Table 6

.060(12) Appendix Hto include the new PMZ.S standard. " Update Emissions Inventory Questionnaire to include PM2,5. " Update Form

3 .0, Emission Fee Calculation to include PM2,5 . 6 . 10CSR10-6.065 Operating Permits. " Update 6.065(1)(D)3.D. to include PMZ,S. 7. 10CSR 10-6.130Controlling Emissions During Episodes ofHighAir Pollution Potential . (Please note this rule currently requires no change but it will be reviewed for any necessary changes when EPAupdates 40 CFRpart 51, Appendix L in the future.) 8 . 10CSR 10-2

.390 Conformity to State or Federal Implementation Plans of Transportation Plans, Programs, and Projects Developed, Funded or Approved Under Title 23 U .S .C. or the Federal Transit Laws. (Pleasenote this rulewill need to be updatedto include PM2,5when thefederal conformity rulesareupdatedto include PMZS.) 9. 10 CSR 10-5

.480 Conformity to State or Federal Implementation Plans of Transportation Plans, Programs, and Projects Developed, Funded or Approved Under Title 23 U.S .C. or the Federal Transit Laws

, r(Please note this rule will need to be updated to include PM2,5 when the federal conformity rules are updated to include PM2,5.)Mr. Joshua A . Tapp Page Three Thank you for your assistance and guidance concerning the 110 SIP requirements. If you have any questions or comments, you can contact me with theAir Pollution Control Programat P.O . Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102 or by phone at (573) 751-4817. Sincerely, AIRPOLLUTIONCONTROL PROGRAM Leanne Tippett osby Director LTM :pms c: Stephen Mahfood, Director's Office James D . Wemer, Air and Land Protection Division

## APPENDIX C

6 .3 Appendix C Effective State Rules and Forms The Missouri air pollution control rules are available for viewing at ; http://www

.sos .mo.gov/adrules/csr/current/lOcsr/lOcsr .asp#10-10 The Missouri air pollution control forms are available for viewing at ; http://intranet.dnr .state.mo.us/forms/forms.htm

## APPENDIX D

6.4 Appendix D November 2006 Public Hearing Notice and Certification of Publication ofthe Notice

## AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION

MODEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AIR POLLUTION CONTROL PRO 

### POB 176 JEFFERSON CITY MO 65'1t12 24307683 

### 7510572 a true copy of which is hereto aftachied, 

### was duly published in the above said newspaper FORTI-1E PERIOD OF : I Day (s) 

### COMMENCING

: November 5,2006 ENDING : November 6s2006 STAR EDITION (S) : 1115 STAR PAPER (S) ; +9 VOLUME: #127 Subscribed and sworn to before me, this Monday, 06 No1fenber, 2006 . 

### I tec'klfy tot I was duly as 8No$aiy PubliGfof' thie Skate of 0, commisskxwd in Jackson 

### County, Missouri . My commiset expires September 10, 2010 . ~ E ¢/ h ;/ EE



### THE KANSAS CITY STAR COMPANY, publishers of THE KANSAS CITY STAR, a newspaper published in the City (f Kansas City, County of Jackson, State of Missouri, confirms that the rloti ce and/orcidYeM serC1ent of 1151SSO-~'I AIR CC7NSEt?~'drTA'ro; r"r~7tSAAlESSIiZt~ a!u mom

Pur1 irriPn :rlNC, r1F~', vcan .- ?ir r.t " ~ari Air C+~erv-''a^- on !Co¢st~" n :on - : a, 11~-t :~a Aat ik,' .~ ~h . t. 14~

.

I

~

; D'^etr,t, -

, 'fadi ng pre TJ r &2Z

, (,i i c ; : : .: ~ t cl r re< Frt i n:eF _~,r Efearrc ~tw~te tni Ua i irr" r ,-fer i tttr~- ta .. :?~ GYA~d I [ .r"tc<ur 6ir Win Ft o,n Eart, . .~ Clsr-

, atg Stata rt N

.i3irw .r e For .rpIaralil and ~A 4r Nttic .n: . : r;~6 [ufa_irK~

. . .rl ~ta~rlce C~uxirr,y ~Pcnd7tda eccrnbar T " 2F ot :eslFt Hearhg Mil b

.;-pin a~ m

. it " he ~E Laanfi~r1p r Center 11U F-t Iral 4[ec , LV ta~rr g~}p[s i ihsliih rl?[~:11 t#>tp'fa rtte .~tdans. sa CSR1as.W

ro~~sraUCtiWt"ftftx BY RAJ* t

14 GSA 10-,UC~eInt~atate Rvfe ~al ~!C*

911t'rora'ts T1 TFc C3.S. Cr, rr~qn?Iptat Prqk~cticir iRgir~t~,~r°s~C ctP.x) da6r In~t:v""t. . Rad¢~ ralrukh9,s .BFt fiv! .r90dtlc1 : t_ rcCr .ca N4 .ft u~nwatl~ ca~tt-= tcztf~in~ ~ Wi ~c et+`~i .6 theE ~r!d li ~

p~ ia U4 ;r . Conal iradlrr~ ~'v5al` ° l41 ~~ 7C~~.~U4 Ct~arn t4ir I~~,,-. ~tato"t3zalqr 3wasrwsnt .

lp"salllt'rC*W

at! 1rrt~erst~tetiude $t~'-ad9~I ~r~~ tat Prakert6oXe statc Rule riaqiire6 -iona`~q ~a~us

"B Soi t+ftllsSll&ns 'iG~ ~rrC3 SS~IIIFti7g irY ~ y Ill p, r h . d~ulillc7 th~rk `~4ad ~t in~ aC ~tsaWtrRS}r~tf~wx¢gncnm ~dic ;rr

b11 ~iSSipP'~Ir:-t .~c. :" . : 't'f~d7'g ~p¢ KD%fda[S.rut i5 ttt+Hl~!~d mW04srfarat xrrru', ; ~en:~vr~ tt^~ iR sC41 ~ .~'~'rTt~t~" ~1QMk5'tksfl$'~Kt ~'1ZfSla>' " 'a,~,'

. z~ e~aa-s,~oc~tt~t or NO( gr~rlssict~ rr~r I~c-- r rr~erat~d uan~s ~3wr~¬Ie~.si :~ ~r~vr~~ gvr~~g tt

### e u~ an I =rr ts.a¬ 1 ~ ,rN~ rw4~. ~i11C5dt ~~+r9681C~n`r,> ::r +r . ; usp~~riSSiw'~s Fr~St

WW ~ " n. ~ .~T ,a t~n,t~ id Rrn~c :r~ot' antS31C}~a CEFr ~ a (2nI . . rcy .Nlr$": _tab?, ; r6tlWa ~ Pnsitilry 8Rt75', nn : 'ra,r~ ¢i¢ct~IK tmev~ ~[ ~USyr~" 'i : : ~ .-,rasee ru4a

tll4l "t5

. Lr,s~ : ." " s oF anal 'ItF ' heq ?r c, ;r . t . . . :.taS1w

SapiCS[ .v : .-0 F r :d P4 I,t~s Rs~r lcnel ~ n 9i . t E SIs644", l~r LCrkisv {Sl1t 416-~16& ~- . . 9Y . W~nal--,d, `~" ".?`kI Persans mr t1~~' tl ; c ag =geciaI s~wstS S"c ~- CCR'sllG~S~S La .rt : " iu YI 1'AEe.TIrn9 4~C+ make WJr ~rir-ant dirwrF a {533 ; rxaaemaarls v ca M`I ~

t~ . t __ t .r .71 fi r " nwTtz: a9 qr psyp rnIny t'r, :ck lr adr5' " d d: ~smui 6

. .-.~,ar r-FSrat sf OA

, ~l Pn~-,r ~t~R lGrtrlir~tsqlacs SexrctEp'3' . P,d$ . F-ar srur, c ;u:~; :

t rz, ;o tn aa v"-r'aai : " rwr- :

~ * r ttn rn"" ttu ,also Rwnt'i~

: . : wr'tor ccf . tt r, mtr ,;, ; k

n -ncret,uy a

. tl~p k1rltk !dt ~, 8 P~h 6c t:~a .a ;

;x T he r rrlrrc-,t also VfiG ~~ttt 1~4r c ~rr+.ats " '+, 1.-- .iii~ 5 ~,[r. on DPL 14 20G 1 r~ar~~ 4t ,94i cummacrts iu L° .:er -

A l ~h i ~ Ccantr4t Pzag'~'s . #{,t~. ;~~ Aa~tv.~CaG42-0t~Rtf=n=

Ad M- ` SMSM I3ESC* ;H' i210'7106 MO DEPT NATURAL PtiSOU~CES, AIR PodunON

CONTROL PROGRAM W . BOX176 JEFFERSONCnY

. MO 65102-0176 County of BuCha1an 

### Sate of Mssouti 1, Leona GillEit'$'Waterx being duly worri according to law, state that I am the 

# -Press, $daily newspaper ing 

### general circulation in the, county of 

# Bucharan, where located;which has been adfriill0d to the Post Office as second c

### lass mafteC` in the city of St. 

### Joseph, the city of publication; where

has been published regularly 

## and consecutively for a period of three Years and has a list of bona fide subscribers voluntarily engaged to pay a iptian for a defirtite period of time, and that such newspaper has compiled with the provisions of Section 493.050 Revised Statutes of Murj, 1W . The atffied red in said newspaper on following date: Run . t1tWld6 to IIIW06 ADSPAM 178 TOTAL (=T-. VIOM MIDON lil07,/0b 

### (Signed)

# AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION IN THE



## ST. LOUIS, WSsOuRi 63101

was pubr~sned as talbws:

n the St . Louis Post-Dispatch



## ~~tesa

Sworn toand subscribed before me, i My term expires it chau~ge'~~,a~~ ~ PATWSACAAUSM ' RMY

_ g~ Qs.r0Mice:.usLk{+. .n+ret o' `?r~unl Ra. : .m .1 ift, ll,SN F!m4ust, 4sl Mis, WONE Cow u Rz+ .!s t*v'sSntt At :7 FAti'+'cd two, 71:ti mmlgaa Il'b+ . ;.aO1mt ftv,e,i! O

T 4 4, 11'S N leafwi t`^4 YU3vTht sit .x4kt' .^,rarf Ms 'to, 1: Caua r.l ~i~ ~:o tv(,~2 Soudfwg R' , E..4Rsr2 : iAlt r*`n,L PI'R ! ,rr " . : BY a,~lr: ;rF , n. in 1 ,~ I I! ~~a'°' Suit

raav<~na~

. A " ,. -r.t AA .<r

. :fl-r ~'h^

" t M~ ~~IF~ F

.1-re! L. b--~.i- a

" 4 .d 1 -

. ._ .. W

i t ~.+s ~.f .~-;nrnur~ ; ti~i?r~~ . f :'A~soxl~;f~`~ ~ ,l~ . nc. a~,~ab

~ .

A C r. -

t J~Yg o, , .,r +,t : ; " . jn . _ r_ifcn'ry

. .SN l :GW

4 .;r . . .

I A^

-- .t-cd ~rd a+nnrclmtern A~it~e,C.r" c ~ C; 3- nt®I RroleCbec Av'E" ney~ rudt n't trrttr'rs Cor .Fit Rr0

:IDb r . Cin.+' 1r<

" - ,'6 m` .iCw POW a? :1 LWdtc<^ . ~:f :> ;®jk" 54 .1n lrtFi~^^~l~` " auan alBrl* Loro"^ rf to _rat,^ 'he 04 : .F1rirP,±+tt r, :#

. . sCntLCa" y4rta91 tib° Clrnn Ait Ir'r

.r<t : Ae ^tr-114t Ir .l L , . -,<att ;~t Frs,eCtrn 4~f:r,G}~~ I`=F?ti

in u ""{ :0 Th,," ;'r:no

:.r . "r9 in.°.if.R'ny r .q.>, ;re:.

~ ~ .rin;; 13'"Aratn

~LC1CSti 1f f Jd>P

" 'ubt" n 'Trading FtW4:SR or UV-1111C G

:r»rtatlrva o

ionI '1`t U5 .!° 1% 4 .6-2 1, dn.rf.a-r_5 . irt~S 34 "l " .1~ tU W

" +91n

7it" ) J7- .*Wt, ' : x

, 1+. c .al'~i~C1 t' ;H' .,_ it,p °,`rr3 :1 :-!flt-r, .S 001 -! .l .C6+0. N . l . " ~! l~i', .Y . ; lr,t,mte! ~

., .~ in . ~`I {) ''01,W : r. ~7rvat,le> _0ri'°T :'- " ., Sntl' P . "" (+t "-t' .=? "5":nG1Y

. -_` . r~. : C13l ..

, :f Ruin stw

~eeA) M,IrW ,~r-rtr

~ ~s

'3" h ' ,'S. EnvtlOl'a'n~nt i P .`n.-t . Y . "qr-tc, ~ If °A$ t' .1 0 . Ai+ t^trrri.9S~ A i r,Ru .-w1 t ttt+4 r, }" _velr0

n.t ~ ; E^, :,gfnr t ,

01 !htn~+, '-frtnt wvu1,7 renc-.e t^< R i( .''! i5- - .n r> " 'qtr!3rr"<:r.i: C IL . . . ~~-7E~', . tltartl''_. 0-&3W

~` .~r+irei Or hi i rr u>.,,osr. Crarrl irr3 Lrrx~" ~uac! ~"2cc Fk ^" : ~~a~ -"

C +31~mm

:~a~Blh+ :', ,jy~n .q ; ">rdsnPr,tSr

.iant'M it8'r""'td r t i : ^f.d .'--- tf^ .r "iv .r,rn75G;.tt 0 p¢p*W

n . Ia 10 . : L F 04 m t: ~ 7hr- rc Qe f r8ttstlblS° . !'J G$fi C 'G 3s%

. m .crH dnn.7ent ',hnr'i this frwl^'-+r'lr, .-,ta' i rr,ttamo, rlgonc^Ya'ti~P$~ :t,IrtSr .,tc R

.fI . " . . - rO -Pewtot3Cscrtx to -rr,ufa? rrx- . . . "_~i= 3CPr'l

, ,mi .s Cr .,J' ' .

~ ;of .r'_rs clhcrct~Ia'a :'rA'''q~ b :.cnd ~?, f Na .

"" .oi :or: plot, -5>Ata A Sfs ;1 1 .111 A: . - ,"JtL~I : .° i' .3 nt'h~ciC

.titiJ+r+,nf : :blUl .l 'h: yr .: " 'H- ,aicn All '_ a 70 . ."t Fhc t .a : h " <air ^t : . ? A1fn"- i'y A m _w t :r i krOa'a Aft ih.raRty

- . " -.~ r'N7~°rf~ S^C ~ .~YlE1y - , . I~f1(f,yr~J`.'ti'f`PCr1

" - a f o la_ : -ar .WJfC.. f .If, :tlo Fi' .=,;JSr'r'! . c " r r : .-:~ City, 15'73)'751-48* v. , Of ,~ f

' ,*

. 91 r E f_,7torn Ar39t°. .i "" rrr R :r-

- " .~? "f .rD . n . tres t 47» ;,x,r :~ ., "t . t ."~t~l f>!os .nO c4

" . : 1Ancw

)3FS_ r-»~.u. 2 -fN .~r~~t~+~ :S.r .., ua,' ;7:7, s, t .uuw s LrnOrtp, i :tte Z1~, a So, .rt`n c" '" t P0~

. ,i (~Yt" -q~

, ,ntprN.7. i'7',' 1 4".M STATE OF WSS"I Ltouk'a'f of GPeene

~~t#~ state that 1arttt, dutyatrftdzed to and do maketf~~s affidavit for and on behalf of Leader, a newspaper f4ibtis1he+d in the City Of Sllir7ngfbetd. GfeOrse County, MissQuri that

, ~d~i~ published ~t ~~ pubit~ti~t, 2t true c~ppy ~which ~ ~ newspaper '1 lime(s) uponthe k4lowirig dates:

an Sunday, November 5 .

i doftardier that "W newspa admi ;led to Iha Post as Office SOOXW

Class rqaaftr, that A is a ti sW of general circulation it "CityotSpingfietd, Missouri ; that 4has puWstted regulartyand w`v* *w a period of mora' than e yews: that ft has a list of bona We sutxscOers voluntarily enqaged as such; who have paid or agreedto pay astAtgd price for a subscription for a defanlte period a4 time, and Inad $aW newspaper has complied with the ptovisrons of Section 14956 Rev 6Sof M'mso+s°i, 'f9%, relating, fo "PWr_ ~d~tt~

Notary Public in and for GreCounty, Missourin at Stmt 17'38 Lower

=~~City, Ma nkam will amy ~,~r CSR 104662 i[n Fan¬s B1' '$) auction ore,

beipg t® s ha wm (t) to do s



## .

10 CSR 1" .364 Air ln%atoc Rub ° tvhg duly Morn rg 6i3 h~r, 9WO P'U ,I O W I am K SHER he The Dall " ~'~ r p ra9 , a daOYAews ape ot9we circulation

. ~he counties Of SkAjer w and o Madrid each Mae ij to tMTaiscot ; ` newspaper has been admitted to ft p0K 01fke as second '~. ~ u~~ matter in Cit ~ ~uff, M , ~t c~ty 1 put~l~ ~; which y Poplar 0 O at }npaper t~ b~n ~' t~ . t mrty se ty ar p c~' tl~r & sed egul and Cw tj cu v f a ema ee ` ft fs and h li t of b n r v u r yt d as su wh

as a s o a foe bGre ol ta il w"` e ch o

0 paid or d $ pri a cri t +n f r

to pay cq WSUbS p io o and a te period 0axama of &a OW

and that ~~~~h er he ns

p has compiled with t praAsIo of sectW Quality Sunlfir& ~.050, Revised St~atr~es of Missouri 198~ . The affixed ne~ct~ appeared in newspaper * the in ~~ ( ~ ~ "t~ I w ~ r

.rA . m' Stmft menuktion Plan - of missouri Plan imomcmfim

And Of Nadond Jkir Quality



## (573)751-0179 city



## ~ ;~~~, ~"~E ~' ~;~St3LFRt~ ~"UNTY OF BUTEEAR) SS . Sectift

Louis 7545 sdcC a1k Sc, 

### i RtgioaW MMom to bakxe me hs

i"Y75l'

8s Dumber at , of ~y

boku public hearings under , the pmvhiow

of ch4gef 6+I3 . R5'bTiSCl. Citi ,crcslainn ras saw,wlr st ii .r AF

# FIDAV . IT OF PUBLICATION



## ~.., .........,... .,~~......x.... ~ ..,...., .... ~~... .

## .......... ~.. , 

## r~ . .,...... ..,.... ,.......

## . ..+~y of..... ..

## .......2o.... V01 .. .. . .----140 . .. . .. .. .. . .. .. . .. .. .... ._day of. .. . .. .. .. . ..

..20.. .. 

## ,...Y...... ,.. .r~~.... ,..... ... ............. ..day

~ . c~.... .. ....~.... e~.,..... ._ ........ .W ....,..... .r.,a...... .....d~ of.. ....... ....2t~....

~ . ..F......, . ..... .N~, ........,.. .......^..<....... .. .~ ~...~...,., ... .~.... vcI . .. .......... .No

..........,. .........._.....day af............ ..~....Emlulm mAnu. am3 rrds"ions °f°mN»g (if i?xitk> of Nitrogen L :anltol Aw Box 176 . ,k: Pvlissaowi 63 tekpho»c (s73)751- U3 . 'The vadmew, 5o'[UOSts ]hr,on : int2x'Grtg 1U givc Vcrb32 ~ ft ItImol-of ** "b* tc,"limoriv to thc isvioa S~Mwy at

oittrs TM 94 20ON ~ oopmunm *CcwWftm Ira( dw nvmd Also ! oc,py of

heuing CIM I StwvAtal, A~w S%Ift Uioxidr (Mi Toding

a Nrlai Ruk, Ao, clairu'l , of Nox

10 csit 10-4,360 Non-F-W,t Geocnrh4 fj,r,crj&ng U14ts wd La~.isims r-n-K"

F'rogmgm, f1mlatiow E"Miuk>M r~tsft Croo ratt

.'em n Mtric Ca6s,ims conuvi lov=lotion, Mmoub Fiat Ig unitli ; i way be Wo

Vs. Agcucy'E, f(or uatka sushvrlt%

csnnbr,tission Caraar,raa¢e by ft t+4issvun

w _050, ktsmo. $1!k)te wVISStatiqn A) Clrwt tvtcvuty latiow urv e :"~ .lFG~ gmdf bCx_ltlml3g in 201

u7e mquired rdu.; S 'gL3pOYCij Me acivntplish ttlsc goal try °~c~a~e~~ ~$t7fff3, iiuNl b--R 7dopEi htiSvutl 0 . tI1Gb5t Noun) k2lwtlre

.cs' tr~ 1 cwt ts : 073 17 51-R$ . . . IVEi .F

2686 NOV - 7 r iF 12: 57



### MT OF PUBLICATION STATEOF MWMRl CburtyofBoone 4 sASHA McMILIM, being duly sworn accordingtoJaw, state that I am oneof d* pubhAars ofdre Columbia Daily TnVww, adailywwspapez of >&WItiOn in theCDunty ofBoonc6Staft of Missour

### i, where

### located-. which rwwspalmr 

### has tan admitwd to 0* Post Ofte as poiadical class 

### nul"W in the Ci,y ofColumbia, ° . the City of publ ¬mtioft; VAich newspaper W

bm published replarly and -vely for a period tttr!ee years and has a !ist of boris fide lremvrltmtatily such, who icavc paid of agrtW w V" a stated price fbr a su' -on for a demate period of time. and dsat such newspaper has caerVlie1 with Ow proisicm of Section 403 .00, Revised starks of Missouri 2000, Swtion 59,31tt, Wad Statutes of Missouri 2000. The affixcd appeared in said nerwspaper on 1* fo99 .cnving trt#rns isaam ; tst irtsertion -_

- November 3,2006 2nd Insertion Ird Insertion 4th tnwtiora Sth hoertiom 6th 7sh kwalion " Insertion 9th Insertion 10(b Insertion 130, 12th Inserfion uWalion !4%l. 19th Insertion 1ft linwriion i?ttti Wertion 1&th traspdtion 1M tnscrtan ~F ¢i V



### MISSOURIAIRcoxsERVA7IONCOMMISSION WRLHOIDPUBLICFEARING RFFMtSf,7N CTrY

. MO -The Missouri Air cousw,aliaft Commissionwill bM

a pab* kwulgon Cansundon Permits ay Rule; CleanAir In RokAnnual, un3sulfur Dioxide (SO2) Trading programs; Bmisdon, Limitations and Omissions Tradft ofOxides ottakrogen: Contvl otNOx i~ws. From Rlettrxc GngUnitsand Non--ngBWkm Control of ing Urh~andSfiftof ~ Missouri plan for uwtim inteaam and futforaftnem

of National AmbientAir Qu*iityStandwcis an Thursday , Damther 7. 2006 . '11wPublic Hmft mR ' at 4a.rts. at ft ElmStreet Center, 1,738 Boa Confimm Elm Svavt, lomr I&M

. Rowing River Conference Rwm, hfieraw City, MO, The o ' onwiill hcwr testimony u1aw

to dw £alkrvringrole wtions. * tfiI CSR ia-6.05

.2 Cmrutruqdan PermitsBy RWe Amendment die proposed wartsms t1.& &° tz1 protectwo AgnWs (SPA's) conmu 0* On tu1Cas wrIvm doesn't provide a "an review

period PA isn"t la into tlreState tatim f1aa. L=VxW

is beingbe added to stau &e aiep husevac, (7) dwyv todo a pre-eonsmwtion permit "° 14 CSR li?d.342 ClownAir tnunble Rule ATM" ldOrc ThAng PMFWM The U .S. Envirionmmxlal an Agnaefs (EPA) Clean Air Interstate Rolerequired sumsto develop rep1atioas to rW= Nohs emissions ftwn "c generating u»begirming in ZOO . This rule Wtl R=rnpliA ftaVo3 by including Missoasrt*: souma in detagional trading progrw cstablisW

by EPA, * 10 CSR It?-0ba4 Clean Air Interstate Rule ! NO% Ttaftg* 10CSR F0-6 .366 Clean Air Interstote Rule S02Trading Program The Wi . Environmental ProtectionAgency's (EPA) Clean Air Interstate Rule required states to develop regulations to reduce S02emissions frpmt"loom

gencrtiting units beginning in 2010~ This proposed ruic will itoonyalitih that gaal by including Missouri's affictcd sour= in the regime] tradingprogramestablished by EPA . '° it# C"Stt 1 ¬1-6

;35o Emission Lamitations and Etrussions, Trading ofOxides of Nitrogen This proM

. cd $mrndsracnt would remsrvt the requirements offt rule upon the irmplccnrntatican of proposed rule 10 CSR i" .362. "lU of tO CSR113-6

.362 am zriare, stringetie than this rule, " 10 CSR 1",360 Contra! of Nt3X Eatitissions Erarn Electric aling Units and Non-Ekcnic 'ng WI= This Proposed amendment would remove the requirements of this ruk upon 'srsaplemertrntaan ofVropoaed rule 10CSR 10-6,362 . The requirements of 10CSR l"_362 are more stringent aluiaa Efiis irale, * 111' CSl'! lft-6,348 Control of Mercury Vraai,ssmons Frorn l :~Aeatic (3enersting Units The U.S. Faavironaar

"ectai Pruwtion s (EPA) Clean Mercury Interstate Rule "ired states to developTcgulYatioaas to reducerrewury emissions fivrs slectrie gffleextfrig ~na~x beginning in 2010. This proposed raett will accomplish tttat goal by including Missouri's af%cted

regional irading, program established by EPA, ' Misaturi Swe Impletrue'ntatton Plain - State oCminnuri Plan for Implementation, Mtr'snlcnance aied Eaafarverrent ofNadienal Ambient Air Quality Standards The Purpose oftWs document is to fulfill the reqtri ofsection 110ofthe lwedaral 0cm Air Art iktttctxdmerits (CAAA) of 1990 . Section 110oftheCAAAroquirics Oateach state submit to the Adininist ¬aw offt US

.jkntriraerscsntal Protection Agenc y (EPA) x Platt, the itnplesrenta3ic^n, rtainumanee and ea3furc=snt offt National NttbiM Air Qkalm

Standards in every air quality region within da,esiasc. This plan demtaonsia°atts ft continued attainment uf1h:primary and secncCdaTy standards for 94-tourazoae and for Fl'vi3,5 . The above documents aiH6 be available !'orreview at the following locations: Missouri Ihpartraaetst of Natural Resources, Air Pollution Control am, 1659 Ebn S't,tceR, .feffegsan City, (573) ?3148t7; Kansas City Regional {lffim5W NE 'Gullim Road, laels Summit, (111G) 622 " 740U; Northeast &e' Office, 1709 Prospect lkiw%Matce, (W) 36.5,2129; Southeast Regional t3ft1w, 2155l+l_ Wesg+xood Boulevard, Poplar BUT, (S'73)8AU-9?S(1; St. Lvais Regional Office, 7545:a. Witrcliar&Sazrte 210, SL Louis. (314) 411-2960 ; Soaotinwcst kegiotal Office. 2040 wr. Woodland, Sprarcgfielf, (417) 891 43QQ . with disabilities requiring stecinl services Orawrnmodataons to attend the meetingcan nuke arrangements by callingttw t tly at (5°7z) 751-7840, ft Cs 1o11 free -number at (900) 334-tiW, or by writing twoweeks in advanceofthe " taNtissoitre DepartmentofNatural Resources, AirConservation +C ` sion * ,f'_0 . Box 176, ,lef'Cet" City, M{3 6r3! 102 . Hewing i,rTsir~cl pers~ta t~yaon~cttl~e irro~emttro~~t May Missouri, ~8~~ 7;~5-294b . °1'1e commissarara holds public heariaap underthe provisions ofcltalita 643 . WsMa. Citizens wishing tospeak at ft public hewing should notify the sectctasy Gta the Mimun Air Conservation Commission, Missouri DcpaitmentofTtistiurat RMurces.Air"lutiorr Control l"roparn, P .O . Box 176, ict'feasan City, Missouri 65102-0 176, or telephone (573) ?ii-'#t,40, 'fhe &V=tsm++t requ" pemms intending 1i give-,Trlbal,

provide su ,~, "~ 'm*opyofti'wiir testimOny to the commission secretary at the time ofOw public lwaring'l'kte depmrtrterttalso wrstt accept written commerit~1 r ~r 1'iarmard Lmcil S p.m on Illectsnbea M

2006; pkase mud twoa*es ofwtitutn ccste,rten¬s to C ."lnt1~ OptraEicarts 5erctic,m, Air 1'olluti _tn Control P .O . Box 1'T6, Jefftnon CAty, MO65102-0176. Pule proposals considered at Ns hewing nay6e adopted by the Missouri Air Conservation Caasunissiara As provided for under autloat~rof 643.050, RShrta. For moreinformation or acomplete mecting sgeada, inctifiingruks being pms+attcd for adep6mconlact the Missouri Department of Natural Resources' Air PollutionControl Programat (573) 751-4917. INSERTION DATE; November 3,2006,

Columbia Daily TribuneA d&Kof Publication Page 2 Printees Fee: $ 201 .37AFFIDAVIT OF PU13LICATION

STATE OF MISSOURI COUNTY OF ADAIR LLarry '9V" . Freels, being duly sworn, according to law, state that I am the Publisher of Kirks+rille Daily Express. a daily newspaper of generalcirculation in the County of Adair, State of Missouri, where located; whichnewspaper has been admitted to the Post Office "periodical class matter in the City Of Nirlsville, b4issouri, the city of publication ; which newspaper has be= published ~egulatrt~ ~nd ee~s~ttti ly f -- , '

ve bTa voluraWly engaged as such who definite period of Wree years and has alist ofbow fide subscribers, Or agreed to PAY a stated price for a subscription for a 493.050 . Revised Statutes 2000 . The affixed notice appeared in said newspaper in the fatlowing consecutive issues. First Insertion Vo1 . 105, No . 263, 6th day of November

Subscribed arid swom

to before me on this h~ day of

f ~e ~'v'~

..1f C .-1 f1 Wa . . . T:-1 .. a . c+aaax ~` A 4ilJAllr legal ran ,page 2

. My Conwriissiott Expire,5 February 21, 20p7. per hascomplied with the provisions of Section , and Section 59,310, lt.evis~d St~ttzt~s ~fMissouri

Publication Fee $388 .134



### .

. MISSOURI AIA CONSERVATIQN IMtlN

WILL HOLDPUBLICHEMING JEFFERSON CITY, MO ~ The Missouri At Conservation Commission will hold a public hearing on C ;onatnuction Permits By Rule; Clean Air Irtos¬ale Rule Annual, Smonxdp and Sulfur Dioxide ~~~~~ Tr~dlll~ Prorarf~6* Emission Limitations and Emissions Traa N ~ c>rc~ias Nilraqon; Con" of N{}x Ennistians From Electric- Generating Units and PbnaseIric Generating Bo'1ler% Control of Mercury Emissions From Electric Getieredng Unk, andState of At'~ssoun Plan for ImpWantadan, Maintenance

at National Ambient Ak Quaifty Standards an r 7, 2406 . The P'ube Hearing will be* at 9 ~ Elm Street Canierance Ceni> 1738East amStreet. River Corkrence Room,Jefferson City, MO . hear tastirnpny related to the following rule Thu Larrver I", . The actions. , 

### 10 CSR10-s.o62Constnctin Permits By Rule

ment addresses the U

.S. ErrvirarmWal cy's ffA's) soncemc that the wle as wdtten dew pre-aanstructfior+ rWew

periodand ilhereisil't ~ppmwatalo Into the St~ I nt~ Plan, i~ tr~rg b®added to sW

the department has wm do s pre-construction permit review . 10CSRtt}~6.382 CleanAir Interstate Rule Annual NQxTradng Program '" (EPA) Clean Ai,r The U .S. t:nvironm+3nnt~ Protection s ' I Rule 'r~d states to dove . ufations to reduce NOX emissionsfromelectric g ing units eginnfng h20,09 . This proposed rule .wfil accomplish that by Inal~ng is~rlls affected sources In the reg tradi~ program sd try EPA . SR1t,F-6.364Glean Air Interstate Rule, Seasonal NOx The U .S. Emiranawtal P

n~ction s (EPA) Clean A~ Interstate Rule required stetestocleve re,gulatx~ to reduce N(3xemissionsfrom

electric ge ° units baonning in 2009 . This proposed rde will acoarrrplish that aal by Including ~1 affected ~r~~ In the ' ~ trading program established by EPA

. . . 14CSR1q-6,31*CISan kInterstate Rule S02Tra*g Program The U .S, Environmental ftlection Interstate Rule tsqui~+ed slates to S(h, . ' from

electric qi .Prop4~ed ruRev~l --- , Di# Nl~ao~ "~d sources in established by,EPA

. (EPA) CleanAir

ations to reduce girtning in 20% by Including

10CSR 10-6.360Control ol NOx Emissions FromEk* Generating Units and Non- Electric Generating Boilers 10CSR 1M350 Emission Limitations and EmissionsTm(ling of O)ddes of Nitrogen This proposed amendment would remove the requirements of t#is ruts upon the Implernentatian qt propoW rule 1{1 CSR 10- 6,362 . Therequirements of 1{i CSS 10-tf.962 am more W" than thisrde. , 'this proposed amendment would remove ft requirements Of this rule upon the impiomentation of proposed rule 10CSR % 6362, The reorennentsof iQCSS 1G-6 .382 are mom

stringent than this rula: 14 CSA1 t}~6

.368 Control of Mercury Ernissicns From Electric Generating Units Pap 2

The'-U .9~ ErnrI I PrcWlon cYs (EPA) Clesi Mercury Interstate Rule required states to deve regulgtfar` t redaoe mercury ' framefec~ er2g units t~r a t1~9 in 2Qit1. Th~ Pf0P090d rule VAN ish that t " ~souri"s aurs~s the re ~nal pro In a Acted s trading aftIlsheci by EPA, ` Ml8111a0d $1310Irnpl$n`1I"tW3on Plan - State dMissouri Plan r Implementation, I)WItenanee

. and E AmbientAir Quality Standards The, pwpow

of ft document is to- WIN the Section 110 ofthe FederalCleanAirAct Ameridrr- ts ¬CAAuc a 1990 . Section 110 ofthe CAAR1 .requires th totheAdmlrristrator ofthe U.S, Environmental (EPA) a an ~r.the mentof the National quality rogiiat within !t* state, nrr~ent atthe prime hour ozone and'for pA+l2.& The above dacurneo wib 

## locations: MisW Control Program, 1660Elm Ks~s C~+r E~ ` t~, 5~ .N~ ~lbem~c~ t,oWs sarn . ) 022 . 000; .WcRrthii%at - ' ¬ fte,1709 Prospect DI ---- autheaat 8 ~rtal-~ , 21'~- I 29,~ S R W d - rd, Popf~ ~~~ ~~` 8~-~T~ ; St Ltwk , "_-'orral O S, I ae , 210, St. (314 + fte 7545 L nd rg Suite ),,4 4 Louis, W . Woodland, .~n~ t~ } 2~1 (417)e914300. with [tisatliGies reoftspecial Services or acoommodata attend the mealIng tltr~ly can ~arrangements by calling ,. ~ ... .__" r~ly at (ST~I ciep toll t

751-7W Ow artmahre j 3348K ex by.vrrldng 1twmwet-^ .-, ---11 The ir~ t Missouri ~ 6 ¬ bat~1 i~esourc ; E t~aneommissian S ` , P .O . Box MO 6610Z HOW" Impaired through Relay MISS04 (800) 29~.. The o holds public- unddisrtf~ptovIs _ _ . ,- $a~ Q~, RSAp

. -wow toap~sJ~atthe-pats~ notdy thlr secretary to'the rI ~Ir~ at , , Missouri ~- 1 ai iV~uret Flesc~rcae,

_ ..r Pollution Cear~l Program, .Q~Bvx 176, Jefferson Ctp ; ~i~rt 65tt32-0f76, or telephone ` _ r~ s k~tdi~ to vide e n co~ry of,their at the time o# tt---_. ..,. ~m~ Rule -proposals considleted et __, . . ._~.. .~ `rf,IGr rvation CttitniWon' ~ ~~'t~ ~

.~~-St~ . Far more'k" trae~ln~ a, ~It~ng na~s be" presents tact th~. . . . ControlPUBLIC ]HEARING 1207/2006i T.1RI AIR CONSERVATION COM14ISSION STATE OF MISSOURI 3 PUBLIC HEARING TRANSCRIPT OF" PROCEEDINGS Thursday, December 7, 2006

5 :0C7 a .m

. Elm Street Conference Center 12 1738 Fast Elm Street 12 Jefferson City, 14 1 5 COMMISSIONERS PRESENT : 16 : :GIrzIni ssioner Jack Raker, Chair Commissioner Micbael Foresman 17 Commissioner Mark A. Fohey c:o,missiorer Kevin L . Rosenbohm 18 Commissioner Richard Rocha Commissioner Mark Garnett 19

REPORTED BY : ~ 9"fona s i e S . VanP,aC .~ntF 4

.rC3'S, CSR, 21 Midwest !Ati .gation Services 3432 W

. Trum= Boulevard, Suite 207 22 Jefferson City, Mo 65!09 

### ) 636-7551 9 25 MWWEST LITIGATION SERVICES

t1itiptie+n.cam Phone: i .S"a80*DM(337b) Fax: 314 .br44 .133d -39-I rule . The Department utilized a great deal of diplomacy and negotiation to make this possible . And should extend that 5 

### e meet who T knoware here oday as well as the Energy Center I notice is here today as well . So that commendation !Dlic'.,uld be

M . 0 This does conclude my corcuRenLs on these rules . if there are any questions, T' d be happy to try and address them at this time . 11. COMMISSIONER BAKER : An 12 for Michael? 13 ~0,Mh:TISSIONER FOHRY: No .

COMMISSIONER BAKER: Okay . MR. JAY: Thank you . : Okay,dy have any questions

1"? comments, and thanks on a job well done . 18 the list would be Paul McConnell, IELL,, next one or

being first duly sworn to testify the . truth ., the whole truth, and nothing but the- truth, testified as follows.

. MCCONI'3ELL : Chairman, Members of the Commission, MY name is Paul McConnel7 . . I am employed 

### 1.lution Control Program as an Environmental 25 Engineer . I work at 1.659 East 81m Street,

IM+++.Wt'AT, LITIGA'nON SERVICES www .tWdd1"eMUpt1onr~ ."om Phone, 1 .80 .280.DEPO(3376) Fax: -40-9 1?3e1~~4 ., s.irattikl1vLT 1LdlO .l+ttV1R

1'm here to present this proposed revision to 

### the Missouri State Tmplementation Plan, SIP. title is Implementation, Maintenan .c 

### National Ambient Air Quality Standards .

310(a)a Tmplemenwat 

### Quality Standards, or NAAQS, new and revised eight-hour ozone and fine The pl an

This proposed change to the SIP will update

late matter of PM2 .5 This proposed plan action as on page 275 of the ly finalized . briefing document .

vo 1 Lure . element has not been repr due to it available Resources Jefferson available However, the complete Missouri STP



### criteria pollutant National AMbiEML Air Plan requirements,

ecl in the briefing document The entire -- the entire document review at the Department of NaLural Air Pollution Control Program, P.O. Box City, Missouri, 65102-wQ176 . online at http : //mAq .dnr .mv .govr'

Background Ozone . 

### It is also 1?6, as

Agency IEPA) established in 1971 a national primary and

maximum one-hour I^1AAQS ozone standard of .08

once per year . . That is not to be exceeded more than

MIDWEST LUIGATIONSERVICES wwwmddwetfili8atWLc0rn 1hom :1 .8ftM

.DEP0(33']6) Fax: 314 .644 .1334r -41-

## APPENDIX E

6 .5 Appendix E December 7, 2006 Public Hearing Comments and ResponsesCOMMENTS AND RESPONSES ON PROPOSED REVISIONS TO THE STATE OF MISSOURI PLAN FOR IMPLEMENTATION, MAINTENANCE ANDENFORCEMENT OF NATIONAL AMBIENTAIRQUALITY STANDARDS On December 7, 2006, the Missouri Air Conservation Commission held a public hearing concerning a proposed revision to the Missouri State Implementation Plan (SIP) for the Implementation, Maintenance and Enforcement ofNational Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) plan. The following is a summary of comments received and the Missouri Department ofNatural Resources' corresponding responses. Any changes to the proposed SIP are identified in the responses to comments. SUMMARY OF COMMENTS: The Missouri Department ofNatural Resources' Air Pollution Control Program received five (5) comments fromthe U .S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) . EPA comments relate to clarifying the submission as it pertains to 110(a)(2)(D)(i) . EPA also commented that they are reserving comments on the remainder of this plan until such time that EPAprovides further guidance on aspects of 110 (other than Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)) . COMMENT: The EPA suggests that Missouri separate the section ofthis document that specifically addresses Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) fromsubmittal and submit this portion separately to EPAfor inclusion into the SIP . By separating out the portion of the submittal dealing with 110(a)(2)(D)(i), Missouri will be able to clearly address EPA's finding made in April 2005 that states failed to make statutorily required plan submissions addressing 110(a)(2)(D)(i) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) pertaining to interstate transport . In regards to the portion of the SIP submittal which addresses all other requirements of 110(a)(1) and (2), Missouri's SIP submission addressing the 8-hour ozone NAAQS is due on December 15, 2007 and the PMZ.s NAAQS is due on October 5, 2008. As indicated in the August 2006 EPAguidance, the Agency intends to provide states with additional information concerning the elements of this SIP submittal, in separate regulations or guidance documents. RESPONSE: Separating the section of this document that addresses Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) would result in a disjointed document that is intended to address Section 11 0(a) requirements. When additional guidance is available for all other requirements of 110(a)(1) and (2), this plan will be reviewed and any revisions deemed necessary will be made as a revision to this document . Therefore, no changes have been made to this plan as a result of this comment . However, there were language changes made as a result of other comments to clarify which section ofthe document specifically addresses the requirements of 110(a)(2)(D)(i) ofthe CAA and to identify the elements the CAA requires to be addressed. -43-COMMENT: The EPA suggests that a short background section be included in the

portion ofthe document that addresses 110(a)(2)(D)(i) to provide an explanation ofthis separate submittal . RESPONSE: Since a separate submittal is not planned for the section ofthe document that addresses 110(a)(2)(D)(i), a separate background is not necessary since the Executive Summary in the plan covers background information. Therefore, no changes have been made to this plan as a result of this comment. COMMENT: The EPAalso commented that headings should be included in the section of the document that addresses 110(a)(2)(D)(i) of the CAAto clearly identify the elements required to be addressed (such as significant contribution, visibility protection and prevention of significant deterioration) . RESPONSE AND EXPLANATIONOF CHANGE: As a result of this comment, headings have been added to identify the elements required to be addressed under 110(a)(2)(D)(i) of the CAA . These headings are: Visibility Protection, Prevention of Significant Deterioration, and Significant Contribution. COMMENT: For theportion of 110(a)(2)(D)(i) which addresses prevention of significant deterioration, EPA suggests providing further clarification that Missouri's permitting regulations for the 8-hour ozone nonattainment area are consistent with EPA's Phase 1 and Phase 2 8-hour ozone implementation rule or will be revised to be consistent when Missouri submits the ozone plan dueJune 15, 2007. Also, the document should further state that Missouri is implementing, in the absence of a final PM Z.s implementation rule, an interimPMa .s program

that involves implementing Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) and Nonattainment New Source Review(NNSR) programs for PMio as a surrogate for the PMz.s requirements. RESPONSE AND EXPLANATION OF CHANGE: As a result ofthis comment, the document language has been amended to more clearly define the program's intent to adopt EPA's regulations and policies related to changes in the implementation ofthe NAAQS. All major sources located in attainment areas in the State of Missouri are currently subject to PSD permitting under state rule 10 CSR 10-6.060 Construction Permits Required section (8) . Major sources located in nonattainment areas are currently regulated under a NNSRpermitting program required by state rule 10 CSR 10-6.060 Construction Permits Required section (7) . Missouri believes that the current rule 10 CSR 10-6.060 Construction Permits Required rule meets the requirements of the Phase lI ozone implementation rule as St. Louis is classified as a moderate ozone nonattainment area. Missouri will followEPA's most current policy on the implementation of all PSD and NNSR regulations as they relate to the implementation of the NAAQS. Missouri will also adopt EPA's revised regulations implementing the revisions to the NAAQS as expeditiously as possible. This will include the adoption of permitting requirements into the state permitting rules as soon as possible. COMMENT: For the portion of 110(a)(2)(D)(i) which addresses visibility protection, EPAsuggests that the language be revised to state -- At this time, Missouri is assessing whether there is any interference with measures in another state designed to protect -44-visibility for the 8-hour ozone and PMZ .s NAAQS. Missouri is assessing visibility protection in conjunction with the Regional Haze SIP . RESPONSE ANDEXPLANATION OF CHANGE: In response to this comment, the language under the Visibility Protection portion of the plan has been changed to further describe how

Missouri is addressing visibility protection . EPA has made no determination that emissions fromany state interfere with 1980 visibility plan measures required to be included in a plan to address reasonably attributable visibility impairment . EPAis not aware of any certification of existing reasonably attributable impairment of visibility by a Federal Land Manager that has not already been resolved. Based on this information, no source in Missouri emits pollutants that interfere with measures included in visibility plans under 1980 regulations. At this time, Missouri's current nonattainment/maintenance plans for the 8-hour ozone and PM2,5 NAAQS are under development. It is expected that these plans will benefit visibility protected areas in Missouri and other neighboring states. This is primarily due to the inclusion of NOX and S02 controls under the Clean Air Interstate Rule and NOX SIPcall regulations. Also, Missouri is working with the Central States Regional Air Partnership (CENRAP) regional planning organization in development of a regional haze plan that is due to be submitted to EPA December 2007. This on-going regional haze plan development process is intended to address incoming visibility impairing pollutants from sources in other states and Missouri source contribution on Missouri Class I areas as well as other states' protected areas.

The document has not been reprinted in the briefing document due to its volume. The entire document is available for review at the Missouri Department of Natural Resources' Air Pollution Control Program, 1659 East Elm Street, P.O

. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0176. It is also available online at http://www

.dnr .m"ov/env/apc /sp tatenlanrevisions htm .

## APPENDIX F

6.6 Appendix F MACCAdoption Certification

### Pursuant to 643.055 R .SMa, the Missouri Air Conservation Commission has determined that this action is needed to have a U .S. Environmental Protection Agency approved State Implementation Plax .



## i Plan for Implementation, Maintenance, and Enforcement of National Ambient Air Quality Standards is hereby adopted by the Missouri Air Conservation Commission this Ist day of February, 2007.

Member



### Member

Member

## APPENDIX G

6.7 Appendix G 8-Hour Ozone and Particulate Matter 2.5 Area Designations Air Quality Designations and Classifications for the 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards; Early Action Compact Areas With Deferred Effective Dates AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) . ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY

: This rule sets forth the air quality designations and classifications for every area in the United States, including Indian country, for the 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality standard. We are issuingthis rule so that citizens will know whether the air where they live and work is healthful or unhealthful and to establish the boundaries and classifications for areas designated as nonattainment. Children are at riskwhen exposed to ozone pollution because their lungs are still developing, people with existing respiratory disease are at risk, and even healthy people who are active outdoors can experience difficulty breathing when exposed to ozone pollution. In this document, EPAis also promulgating the first deferral of the effective date, to Sept . 30, 2005, of the nonattainment designation for EarlyAction Compact areas that have met all milestones through March 31, 2004. Finally, we are inviting states to submit by July 15, 2004, requests to reclassify areas iftheir design value falls within five percent of a high or lower classification. This rule does not establish or address state and tribal obligations for planning and control requirements which apply to nonattainment areas for the 8-hour ozone air quality standard. Two separate rules, one ofwhich is also published today, set forth the planning and control requirements which apply to nonattainment areas for this standard. The second rule will be published at a later date. EFFECTIVE DATE: This final rule is effective on June 15, 2004. " 27. In Sec. 81 .326, the table entitled "Missouri--Ozone (8-Hour Standard)" is added to read as follows: Sec. 81 .326 Missouri . -48-Missouri-8-Hour Ozone Standard

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Designated Area Designation (A .)° (1 .)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Kansas City, MO

: Cass County. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unclassifiable (B .) Clay County. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., Unclassifiable (B .) Jackson County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unclassifiable (B .) Platte County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unclassifiable (B.) St . Louis, MO

: Franklin County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . Jefferson County. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., St . Charles County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . St . Louis City. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . St . Louis County. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Nonattainment. . . . . . . Nonattainment. . . . . . . . . Nonattainment. . . . . . . . . Nonattainment. . . . . . . . . Nonattainment. . .. . . . . . Subpart 2/Moderate.

Subpart 2/Moderate. Subpart 2/Moderate. Subpart 2/Moderate. Subpart 2/Moderate. AQCR094 Metro Kansas City Interstate: Unclassifiable/Attainment Buchanan County Ray County AQCR 137 N

. Missouri Intrastate (part) : Pike County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ralls County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . AQCR 137 N

. Missouri Intrastate . . . . . . . . . . Remainder of State: Adair County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Andrew County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Atchison County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Audrain County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., Boone County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Caldwell County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Callaway County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Carroll County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chariton County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Clark County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Clinton County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cole County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cooper County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Daviess County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., . . . . . DeKalb County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gentry County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Grundy County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Harrison County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment

-49-Missouri-8-Hour Ozone Standard (Continued)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Designated Area Designation (`' .)' (1 .)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

__ . . ~ . . , . . Holt County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Howard County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Knox County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Lewis County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Lincoln County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Linn County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Livingston County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Macon County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Marion County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mercer County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Moniteau County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Monroe County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Montgomery County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Nodaway County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Osage County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PutnamCounty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Randolph County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Saline County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Schuyler County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Scotland County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Shelby County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sullivan County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Warren County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Worth County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Rest of State: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unclassifiable/Attainment Barry County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unclassifiable/Attainment Barton County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unclassifiable/Attainment Bates County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unclassifiable/Attainment Benton County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unclassifiable/Attainment Bollinger County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unclassifiable/Attainment Butler County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unclassifiable/Attainment Camden County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unclassifiable/Attainment Cape Girardeau County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unclassifiable/Attainment Carter County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unclassifiable/Attainment Cedar County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unclassifiable/Attainment Christian County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unclassifiable/Attainment Crawford County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unclassifiable/Attainment Dade County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unclassifiable/Attainment Dallas County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unclassifiable/Attainment Dent County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unclassifiable/Attainment Douglas County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unclassifiable/Attainment -50-Missouri-8-Hour Ozone Standard (Continued)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Designated Area Designation (A .)° (I .)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dunklin County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gasconade County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Greene County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Henry County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Hickory County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Howell County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Iron County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Jasper County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Johnson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Laclede County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Lafayette County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Lawrence County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Madison County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Maries County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . McDonald County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Miller County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mississippi County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Morgan County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . New Madrid County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Newton County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Oregon County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ozark County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Pemiscot County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Perry County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Pettis County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Phelps County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Polk County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Pulaski County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Reynolds County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ripley County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . St . Clair County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . St . Francois County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ste. Genevieve County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Scott County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Shannon County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stoddard County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stone County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Taney County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Texas County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attairunent Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment Vernon County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unclassifiable/Attairunent Washington County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unclassifiable/Attainment Wayne County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unclassifiable/Attainment -51-Missouri-8-Hour Ozone Standard (Continued)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Designated Area Designation (A .), (1 .)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Webster County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. Unclassifiable/Attainment Wright County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unclassifiable/Attainment

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- A' Includes Indian Country located in each county or area, except as otherwise specified. B~ This area is given an " Unclassifiable" designation. EPAwill reviewall available information and make an attainment or nonattainment decision after reviewing the 2004 data. 1~ This date is June 15, 2004, unless otherwise noted



## Particulate Matter 2.5 Area Designations [Federal Register : January 5, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 3)] [Rules and Regulations] [Page 943-1019] From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [DOCID :fr05ja05-21] [[Page 944]] ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIONAGENCY 40 CFRPart 81 [OAR-2003-0061 ; FRL-7856-1] RIN-2060-AM04 Air Quality Designations and Classifications for the Fine Particles (PM2,5) National Ambient Air Quality Standards AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) . ACTION

: Final rule. SUMMARY: This rule sets forth the initial air quality designations and classifications for all areas in the United States, including Indian country, for the fine particles (PM2,5) National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) . The EPAis issuing this rule so that citizens will know whether the air quality where they live and work is healthful or unhealthful . Health studies have shown significant associations between -52-exposure to PM2,5and premature death fromheart or lung disease . Fine particles can also aggravate heart and lung diseases and have been linked to effects such as cardiovascular symptoms, cardiac arrhythmias, heart attacks, respiratory symptoms, asthma attacks, and bronchitis. These effects can result in increased hospital emissions, emergency room visits, absences fromschool or work, and restricted activity days . Individuals that may be particularly sensitive to PM2 .5 exposure include people with heart or lung disease, older adults, and children. This rule establishes the boundaries for areas designated as nonattainment, unclassifiable, or attainment/unclassifiable. This rule does not establish or address State and Tribal obligations for planning and control requirements that apply to nonattainment areas for the PM2 .5 standards. The EPA will publish a separate rule which will set forth the planning and control requirements that apply to nonattainment areas for the PM2

.5 standards. DATES: The effective date of this rule is April 5, 2005.

- 27. In Sec. 81 .326, the table entitled "Missouri .-PM2 .5" is added to the end of the section to read as follows: Sec . 81 .326 Missouri . Missouri-PM2,5 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Designated area Designation (A.)° (1 .)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- St. Louis, MO

: Franklin County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Jefferson County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . .. .. .. ., . St . Charles County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . St . Louis County. . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . St . Louis City. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rest of State: Adair County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. .. . . .. .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . AndrewCounty. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Atchison County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. .. .. .. .. .. Audrain County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . Barry County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Barton County. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bates County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Benton County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. .. . . .. .. . . . Bollinger County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Boone County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Nonattainment. Nonattainment . Nonattainment . Nonattainment . Nonattainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment. Unclassifiable/Attainment. Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . -53-Missouri-PM2,5 (Continued)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Designated area Designation (A .)' (1 .)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Buchanan County.. . . .. .. .. .. . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . Butler County. . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Caldwell County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Callaway County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Camden County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cape Girardeau County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Carroll County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Carter County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cass County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cedar County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chariton County. . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . .. .. .. .. . . .. .. .. .. . . .. . Christian County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . .. . . .. .. . . Clark County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Clay County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Clinton County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cole County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cooper County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Crawford County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dade County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dallas County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Daviess County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . DeKalb County. .. .. . . .. .. .. .. . . .. .. .. . . . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. Dent County. . . . .. .. .. . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . Douglas County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dunklin County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gasconade County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gentry County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Greene County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Grundy County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Harrison County. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Henry County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Hickory County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Holt County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Howard County. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Howell County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Iron County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Jackson County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Jasper County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Johnson County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . Knox County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Laclede County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Lafayette County.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . -54-Missouri .-PM2,5 (Continued)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Designated area Designation (A)^ (1)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lawrence County. . . . . . . .. . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . Lewis County

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. . . .. . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . Lincoln County. . . . . . . .. . . .. .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Linn County. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Livingston County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . McDonald County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., . Macon County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Madison County. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Maries County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Marion County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mercer County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. .. . . . . . . Miller County

. . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mississippi County

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Moniteau County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . Monroe County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . .. Montgomery County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Morgan County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . New Madrid County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Newton County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Oregon County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Osage County.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ozark County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . Pemiscot County. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Perry County. . . .. .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Pettis County

. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. .. . . .. . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Phelps County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Pike County. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Platte County. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Polk County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Pulaski County.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PutnamCounty. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ralls County. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Randolph County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ray County

. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Reynolds County. . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ripley County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. .. . . . . .. . . .. . . . . St . Clair County

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. St . Genevieve County. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . St . Francois County. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . .. .. .. . . .. . . . Saline County. . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Schuyler County. . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment. Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . -55-Missouri .-PM2,5 (Continued)

Scotland County. . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . .. .. .. . . . . .. .. .. .. . . . . . . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Designated area Designation (A)° (1)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scott County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Shannon County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Shelby County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stoddard County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stone County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sullivan County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Taney County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Texas County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Vernon County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . Warren County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Washington County. .. .. .. .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . .. Wayne County. .. .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Webster County. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Worth County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Wright County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment . Unclassifiable/Attainment .

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ A, Includes Indian Country located in each county or area, except as otherwise specified. '' This date is 90days after January 5, 2005, unless otherwise noted.

## APPENDIX H

6.8 Appendix H Missouri Air Quality Monitors Data for Years 2003, 2004 and 2005

8-Hour Design Values 4th High 8-hr Avera e b Design Value I Missouri 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 01-03 02-04 03-05 Arnold 86 93 82 70 92 87 81 81 West Alton 85 99 91 77 89 91 89 85 Orchard Farm 88 98 90 76 92 92 88 86 Blair St . 89 na Mar aretta 80 98 90 72 91 89 86 84 Sunset Hills 88 98 88 70 89 91 85 82 Mary land Hts 88 na Pacific 87 na Bonne Terre 75 92 83 70 84 83 81 79 I Fole 89 na Illinois Jerse ille 84 100 83 73 83 89 85 79 Alton 82 94 89 74 91 88 85 84 M ille 73 90 88 78 88 83 85 84 Wood River 78 84 83 73 87 81 80 81 Houston 77 85 77 64 74 79 75 71 East St . Louis 78 93 79 73 94 83 81 82 Missouri Libert y 79 87 88 71 88 84 82 82 Watkins Mill 73 83 85 67 79 80 78 77 Rock Creek 91 88 69 87 na na 81 RGSouth 72 83 82 61 81 79 75 74 Trimble 71 87 79 Kansas Wyandotte CO 76 80 84 63 79 80 75 75 U .S Penitentiary 82 66 77 75 Heritag e Park 81 66 81 76

-57-Spring field Hillcrest H

.S. 71 74 72 64 77 72 70 71 Outstate Mark Twain 76 85 71 61 75 77 72 69 Eldorado S s 74 82 80 71 79 78 77 I76 Farrar 66 79 - 1 na 

## Annual PM2

.5 Total Mass for 2002-2005 24-hr Std = 65 gg/m3 Design Values 98th percentile 98th percentile St. Louis 2002 2003 2004 2005 02-04 03-05 West Alton 35.0 35.5 30.2 38.5 33.6 34.7 Margaretta 35.5 31 .5 26.5 40.0 31 .2 32.7 Blair Street 36.5 32.0 27.9 40 .3 32.1 33.4 South Broadway 36.5 33.2 28.5 38.6 32.7 33.4 Mound Street 35.9 33.2 30 .3 40 .8 33.1 34.8 Clayton 36.9 33.2 33.7 43.5 34.6 36.8 Sunset Hills 34.0 30.5 32.6 38.3 32.4 33.5 Arnold 46.5 37.2 34.8 41 .7 39.5 37.9 Kansas City Liberty 30.3 28.1 26.5 31 .2 28.3 28.6 Troost 34.0 31 .4 27.3 34.2 30.9 31 .0 UMKC 30.1 34.1 27.3 34.0 30.5 31 .8 RG- South 26.0 29.8 22.7 31 .4 26.2 28.0 Outstate El Dorado Springs 28.9 27.3 25.7 33.1 27.3 28.7 Mark Twain St . 29.0 29.3 21 .9 32.3 26.7 27.8 Pk. Ste . Genevieve 34.2 33.8 25.8 36.1 31 .3 31 .9 MSU 27.8 29.4 26.6 33.6 27.9 29.9 St . Joseph 30.9 28.2 32.0 35.1 30.4 31 .8 Columbia 29.3 30.6 25.4 34.7 28.4 30 .2 Annual Mean Std = 15 .0 gg/m3 Design Values Annual Mean St. Louis 2002 2003 2004 2005 02-04 03-05 West Alton 14.0 14.0 11 .9 15.2 13.3 13.7 Margaretta 14.3 13.5 12.1 15.1 13.3 13.6 Blair Street 15.4 14.1 13.1 16.1 14.2 14.4 South Broadway 15.3 14.4 13.4 15.9 14.4 14.6 -58-Mound Street 15.6 14.7 13.1 15.9 * *

Clayton 14.6 13.6 12.6 15.5 13.6 13.9 Sunset Hills 13.0 13.0 11 .9 15.5 12.6 13.5 Arnold 15.1 13.9 12.5 15.4 13.8 13.9 Kansas City Liberty 12.3 11 .7 9.5 12.2 11 .2 11 .1 Troost 14.0 13.1 12.0 14.1 13.1 13.1 UMKC 13.3 12.7 11 .0 12.5 12.4 12.1 RG- South 11 .7 11 .1 9 .8 11 .6 10.9 10.9 Outstate El Dorado Springs 11 .8 11 .4 9 .9 12.1 11 .0 11 .1 Mark Twain St . 11 .4 11 .4 9 .2 12.1 10.6 10.9 Pk. Ste. Genevieve 13.7 13.6 12.4 15.0 13.2 13.7 MSU 12.7 11 .7 11 .0 13.0 11 .7 11 .9 St . Joseph 13.0 11 .9 11 .4 14.5 12.2 12.7 Columbia 12.4 12.5 10.2 12.9 11 .7 11 .8 * - middle scale site - not for comparison to annual average

## APPENDIX I

6 .9 Appendix I Missouri Air Quality Monitors Locations Oxides of Nitrogen, Particulate Matter, Ozone and Oxides of Sulfur as of9/30/05 Agency Site Identification Site Name Pollutant Environmental Services 29-047-0003 Watkins Mill 030) 29-047-0005 Liberty N02 PM2 .5 PM2 .5 (2) 030) 29-183-1002 West Alton NOZ

29-021-0005 St . Joseph Pump Station PM2 .5 030) PMIo PM2 .5 29-097-0003 Carthage Stone PMIo PMIo (2) 29-047-0026 North Kansas City PMIO(discontinued 1 July) 29-099-0012 Arnold 030) PM2 .5 PM2 .5 (2)29-137-0001 Mark Twain State Park 030) PMIo PM2 .5 SOZ 29-183-1004 Orchard Farm 030) 29-157-0001 Farrar 03(l) 29-113-0003 Foley 030) 29-186-0005 Bonne Terre

29-039-0001 El Dorado Springs N02 030) PM2 .5 (2) 03 PM2 .5 PM2 .5 (2) 29-186-0006 Ste. Genevieve PM2 .5 29-019-0001 Columbia PM2 .5 20-047-0006 Rocky Creek 030) 20-049-0001 Trimble 030) 29-095-0035 Van Brunt PMIo 29-095-0034 Troost N02 PMIo PM2 .5 PM2 .5 (2) S02 -61-29-037-0003 Richards Gebaur South 030) PM2 .5 29-165-0023 KCI 030) SOZ 29-095-0010 UMKC PM2 .5 29-163-0002 Clarksville S02 ST LOUIS COUNTY 29-189-0004 Sunset Hills N02 03(l) PM2 .5 S02 29-189-2003 Clayton Animal Shelter PMIo PM2 .5 29-189-0006 Queeny NOz 030) S02 29-189-3001 Ladue N02 PM2 .5 (2) S02 29-189-0014 Maryland Heights NOZ 030) S02 29-189-0005 Pacific 030)ST LOUIS CITY 29-510-0007 South Broadway PM2 .5 SOZ 29-510-0072 Clark N02 (discontinued 1 May) 29-510-0088 Hall Street PM1o (2) 29-510-0085 Blair Street 030) PMIo PM2 .5 (2) PM2 .5 29-510-0086 Margaretta N02 03 (1) PMIo PM2 .5 S02 29-510-0087 Mound Street PMIo PM2.5 29-510-0092 North Market PMIo (2) SPRINGFIELD 29-077-0026 South Charleston S02 29-077-0032 Missouri State PMIo University PM2 .5 S02 29-077-0036 Hillcrest High School N02 03(l) 29-077-0037 James River-South S02 (1) Operates only during ozone season (4-1/10-31) -63-(2) Some PM2,5 and PMIOreadings are measured and recorded by Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalance Monitors (TEOM) .

## Missouri State MapAir Monitor Locations Statewide Spatial Distribution of the PR2 .5 Mass 2003-2005 Annual Design Values ( Annual mean Std= 15 ug/m3) 11a.- ..._

Site# Site N am

e

--.......... Ol WestAltan 02 Margaretta 03 B1airStreet 04 SouthBroadway 05 Clayton 06 SunsetHills 07 Arnold Kansas City.4i-ea Site# Site Name 08 Liberty 09 Troost 10 UMKC 11 RG-South Qutstate Area Site# Site Name 12 St . Joseph 13 Mark Twain State Park 14 Columbua 15 El Dorado Springs 16 LOU 17 St Gernevieve

111111111112 ., .=J

Ys1 .W .n.l,umm

.nr .,m .tt.1 .~

.1 AsaYelWanC .adlAapm fksgesd~Rplr~ " dYpRmcaMalas, OiC1~ :005 1 0 12 .5 25 5D Miles I _1 1State-Aide Spatial Distribution of the PM2 .S Mass 2003-2005 24-hour Design Values ( 24-hr Std = 65 uglm3) end ~,m,I !1 3 PM2.5 MnniDor , . . ^° . Design Value 12004Designation, MO ~~aucxamen St . Louis Area Site# Site Name

............ . ............ .. . .. ... 01 West Alton 02 Margaretta 03 Blair Street 04 South Broadway 05 Clayton 06 Sunset Hills 07 Arnold Kansas City Area Site# Site Nme

..- ...-- ._._ ............. 08 Liberty 09 Troost 10 UMKC 11 RG-South (3utstate Area Site# Site Name 12 St . Joseph 13 Mark Twain State Park 14 Columbia 15 El Dorado Springs 16 MSU 17 St Genevieve

r.a~ . .e. .mia.~ saRg4aaRyA~a BWni, o4Rlflaoi)Spatial Distribution of the Manitor+ed 8-hour Ozone Concentration

..` - 2003-2005 8-hour Design Values ( 8-hr Std = 85 ppb)

17 Trimble 18 WatkinsMill 19 RockyCreek 20 Liberty 21 RG-Sotrth

~Leie L TUW 

### Q," I t, Louis Ayea Smilies#SoSwitie Nam 01 Foley 02 OrchardFarm 03 WesEAlton 04 Margaretta 05 B1airStreet 06 MarylandHts 07 Pacific 08 SunsetHills 09 Araold 10 Boruue Terre IDinois Site# Site Name 11 Jerseyville 12 Aiton 13 WoodRiver 14 Maryville 13 EastSt Louis 16 Hoiuton

0 12 `. - . 1 qlka

## APPENDIXJ

6 .10 Appendix J Clean Air Interstate Rules and Clean Air Mercury Rule MACCAdoption Certification

### n .Order of RVILMakin

~~~,~,~~ Pursuant to 643.055 RSMo, the Missouri Air Conservation Commission has determined that this action is needed to have a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency approved State Implementation Plan.

lean Air Interstate Rule Annual NOx Trading Programis hereby ADOPTEDby the Missouri Air Conservation Comrrission this 1st day of February, 2007. 

### Chairman 

## airman Member

Member 

## Member

, Member

### lean Air Interstate Rule Seasonal NOx Trading i Air Conservation Commission this 1 st

, Member

### Or gi Rule "



### Pursuart to 643.055 RSMo, the Missouri Air Conservation Commission has determined that this action is needed to have a US. Environmental Protection Agency approved State Implementation Plan. 

## terstate Rule SC2Trading Programis her( ion this 1st day of

Member

### Pursuant to 643,t}55 RSMo~ the Missouri Air Conservation Commission has

determined that this action is needed to have a U .S. Environmental Fro' Agency roved State Implementation Plan. 

## 10CSR 10-6. Control of Mercury Emissions FromElectric Generating Units is hereby ADOPP1"EDby the Missouri Air Conservation Commission this 1st day e, Frabrruary, 2ow'. irrnan

Vice-Chairman

ber



## ., Member

Member