alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
First Montauk Financial Corp.
                         Computation of Income per Share
                                   Exhibit 11
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                    "Years ended December 31,"
                                    1996             1995

Primary:

<S>                              <C>            <C>
Net income                       $   32,789     $  768,088
                                  ---------      ---------
                                  ---------      ---------

Weighted average number of
  common shares outstanding       7,977,724      8,044,622

Assuming  exercise of options  reduced by the number of shares  which could have
 been purchased with the proceeds from exercise of such options based on average
 market price                       645,814        377,743
                                  ---------      ---------
Weighted average number of
 common shares outstanding,
 as adjusted                      8,623,538      8,422,365
                                  ---------      ---------
                                  ---------      ---------

Net income per share          $        0.01  $        0.09
                                  ---------      ---------
                                  ---------      ---------
Assuming full dilution:

Net income                    $      32,789  $     768,088
                                  ---------      ---------
                                  ---------      ---------
Weighted average number of
  common shares outstanding       7,977,724      8,044,622

Assuming exercise of options
reduced
   by the number of shares which
   could have been purchased
   with the proceeds from
   exercise of such options
   based on ending market price     689,135        856,709
                                  ---------      ---------

Weighted average number of
  common shares outstanding,
  as adjusted                     8,666,859 *    8,901,331
                                  ---------      ---------
                                  ---------      ---------
Net income per share          $        0.01    $      0.09

</TABLE>

     *This  calculation  is submitted in  accordance  with  Regulation  S-K item
601(b)(11)  although  not  required by footnote 2 to paragraph 14 of APB Opinion
No. 15 because it results in dilution of less than 3%.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 58 (Wednesday, March 26, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 14448]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-7650]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[Notice 97-033]


Notice of Prospective Patent License

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of prospective patent license.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NASA hereby gives notice that New Mexico Highlands University, 
of National Avenue, Las Vegas, New Mexico 87701, has applied for an 
exclusive Patent license to practice the invention described and 
claimed in U.S. Patent No. 5,562,963, entitled ``Absorbent Pads for 
Containment, Neutralization and Clean-up of Environmental Spills 
Containing Chemically-Reactive Agents,'' NASA Case No. MSC-22360-1, and 
U.S. Patent Application Serial Number 08/654,461, same title, NASA Case 
No. MSC-22360-2, which are both assigned to the United States of 
America as represented by the Administrator of the National Aeronautics 
and Space Administration. Written objections to the prospective grant 
of a license should be sent to Johnson Space Center.

DATES: Responses to this notice must be received by May 27, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Hardie R. Barr, Patent Attorney, Johnson Space Center, Mail Code HA, 
Houston, TX 77058-3696, telephone (281) 483-1003.

    Dated: March 19, 1997.
Edward A. Frankle,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 97-7650 Filed 3-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 53 (Wednesday, March 19, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 12987]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-7120]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m., Monday, April 14, 1997.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C. 9th Fl. Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Adjudicatory Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 97-7120 Filed 3-17-97; 3:40 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
# C_2022441EN.01002902.xml

| 21.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 441/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 441/29

---

Action brought on 6 October 2022 — Van Oosterwijck v Commission

(Case T-622/22)

(2022/C 441/41)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Viviane Van Oosterwijck (Kontich, Belgium) (represented by: F. Moyse, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of 7 July 2022 and to the extent necessary the decision of 15 December 2021, decisions by which the Commission refused to grant a survivor’s pension to the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of 7 July 2022 and to the extent necessary the decision of 15 December 2021, decisions by which the Commission refused to grant a survivor’s pension to the applicant;

| — | accordingly, recognise the applicant as being entitled to a survivor’s pension under Articles 19 and 20 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations; |
| --- | --- |

—

accordingly, recognise the applicant as being entitled to a survivor’s pension under Articles 19 and 20 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations;

| — | in any event, order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

in any event, order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law, based on a plea of illegality of Article 20 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union (‘the Staff Regulations’) on account of the violation of the principles of equal treatment and non-discrimination on the basis of the duration of her relationship with her spouse. The applicant claims, inter alia, that the distinction that must be established in the present case, namely the fact that the requirement relating to the minimum duration of the marriage, in the situations covered by the abovementioned Article 20 is much greater than that in the situations covered by Article 19 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations, even though that all those situations are comparable, had to be regarded as arbitrary or manifestly inappropriate in the light of the objective pursued by the legislature.

---
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   Exhibit 23.2

                      Consent of Independent Accountants



We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" and to the 
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File Nos. 
33-64307 and 333-23229) and the related Prospectus of Frontier Corporation and
to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectuses constituting part of the
Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File No. 33-57895), Form S-4 (File Nos.
33-61047 and 33-91250) and in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos.
33-67430, 33-67432, 33-67324, 33-51331, 33-51885, 33-52025, 33-54511, 33-54519,
33-59579, 33-61855 and 333-04803 of Frontier Corporation of our reports dated
January 17, 1996 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
financial statement schedule II of ALC Communications Corporation and
subsidiaries which reports are included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Frontier Corporation for the year ended December 31, 1996 to be filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.


                                                   ERNST & YOUNG LLP



March 26, 1997
Detroit, Michigan
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5                             
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                    U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                            OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                           1
<CASH>                                     528,559
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                              9,151,526
<ALLOWANCES>                               25,000
<INVENTORY>                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           9,732,960
<PP&E>                                     328,502
<DEPRECIATION>                             122,177
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             9,889,792
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      2,278,302
<BONDS>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                                   88,133
<OTHER-SE>                                 5,058,372
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               9,889,792
<SALES>                                   16,458,567
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          16,458,567
<CGS>                                     14,860,738
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                903,359
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           0  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            15,681
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              678,789
<INCOME-TAX>                                  46,735
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          632,054
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0  
<NET-INCOME>                                 632,054
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                0.10
        


</TABLE>
# t28p01p1
U.S. Energy Information Administration | Quarterly Coal Report, January - March 2024

Table 19. Average price of U.S. coal imports

(dollars per short ton)

Year to date

Continent and country

of origin

January - March

2024

October - December

2023

January - March

2023 2024 2023

Percent

change

North America Total 281.35 238.15 249.04 281.35 249.04 13.0

Canada 281.81 238.29 250.43 281.81 250.43 12.5

Mexico 66.25 66.10 149.91 66.25 149.91 -55.8

South America Total 233.40 109.66 119.37 233.40 119.37 95.5

Colombia 244.67 101.69 114.36 244.67 114.36 113.9

Peru 212.50 183.58 210.16 212.50 210.16 1.1

Europe Total 203.63 75.22 176.97 203.63 176.97 15.1

Germany, Federal

Republic of

3,875.00 75.22 - 3,875.00 - -

Greece 316.92 - - 316.92 - -

Ireland 265.83 - 176.90 265.83 176.90 50.3

Netherlands 72.16 - - 72.16 - -

United Kingdom 316.91 - 1,633.50 316.91 1,633.50 -80.6

Asia Total 77.43 103.47 122.31 77.43 122.31 -36.7

China 77.78 104.71 122.31 77.78 122.31 -36.4

Japan 65.96 65.95 - 65.96 - -

Africa Total - 1,818.00 282.87 - 282.87 -

South Africa - 1,818.00 282.87 - 282.87 -

U.S. Total* 232.99 137.86 147.05 232.99 147.05 58.4

* U.S. Total is the average price of all coal imports.

- = No data reported.

Note: Average price is based on the customs import value, including value for shipments of specialty coal not used as a fuel source (about 0.05 percent of all shipments).

Customs import value is the price paid for merchandise when sold for exportation to the United States, excluding U.S. import duties, freight, insurance, and other

charges incured in bringing the merchandise to the United States. Coal imports include coal to Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. Total may not equal sum of

components because of independent rounding.

Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, 'Monthly Report IM 145.'
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-1458

CHRISTIAN T. MBOUENDE,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A72-190-414)

Submitted: March 18, 2005 Decided: March 28, 2005

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steffanie J. Lewis, INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS LAW FIRM, Washington,

D.C., for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General,

Christopher C. Fuller, Senior Litigation Counsel, Lyle D. Jentzer,

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for

Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Christian T. Mbouende, a native and citizen of Cameroon,

petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reopen immigration

proceedings. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and

find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the

motion as untimely filed. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2) (2004);

INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24 (1992). We further find that

we lack jurisdiction to review Mbouende’s claim that the Board

should have exercised its sua sponte power to reopen his

proceedings. Enriquez-Alvarado v. Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 246, 249-50

(5th Cir. 2004); Belay-Gebru v. INS, 327 F.3d 998, 1000-01 (10th

Cir. 2003); Calle-Vujiles v. Ashcroft, 320 F.3d 472, 474-75 (3d

Cir. 2003); Ekimian v. INS, 303 F.3d 1153, 1159 (9th Cir. 2002);

Luis v. INS, 196 F.3d 36, 40-41 (1st Cir. 1999). 

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 48 (Wednesday, March 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 11428]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6127]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP97-67-002]


Williams Natural Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

March 6, 1997.
    Take notice that on February 28, 1997, Williams Natural Gas Company 
(WNG) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second 
Revised Volume No. 1, the tariff sheets listed on Appendix A to the 
filing, to be effective May 1, 1997.
    WNG states that a copy of its filing was served on all participants 
listed on the service list maintained by the Commission in the docket 
referenced above and on all of WNG's jurisdictional customers and 
interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed on 
or before March 21, 1997. Protests will be considered by the Commission 
in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve 
to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-6127 Filed 3-11-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32.1

                   Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                      As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
                      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Digital Fuel, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do certify, to my
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Date: November 16, 2009



 /s/ Michael R. Farley
-------------------------
Michael R. Farley
Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 10.24

                     AMENDMENT TO READING & BATES CORPORATION
                              STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT


         This Amendment to the Stock  Option Agreement between Reading & Bates
   Corporation ("Company")  and Paul B. Loyd,  Jr. ("Optionee") is made  as of
   December 3, 1996.


                                   WITNESSETH:

         WHEREAS, the Compensation  Committee which administers the  Reading &
   Bates Corporation  1992 Long  Term Incentive  Plan ("Plan")  has determined
   that it is in the best  interests of the Company to amend the  Stock Option
   Agreement executed on March 22, 1996, effective  as of December 5, 1995, in
   the manner set out below, and Optionee has agreed to same;

         NOW  THEREFORE, for  and in  consideration of  these premises,  it is
   hereby agreed as follows:

         Paragraph 3 of the Agreement is amended,  effective as of the date of
         this Amendment, to read as follows:

               "3.   This Option  shall not  be exercisable,  except upon  the
               death  or disability  of the  Optionee, until after  six months
               immediately  following the  date this  Option  is granted,  and
               thereafter shall be exercisable for common stock as follows:

                     After one  year following  the effective  date of  grant,
                     this  Option shall be exercised  for any number of shares
                     up  to and  including  100% of  the  aggregate number  of
                     shares subject to this Option;

               provided the number  of shares as to which  this Option becomes
               exercisable shall,  in each case,  be reduced by the  number of
               shares theretofore purchased pursuant to the terms hereof."

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment is executed this      day of      
             , 1997, effective as of the 3rd day of December, 1996.

                                       READING & BATES CORPORATION


                                 By:   __________________________
                                       T. W. Nagle
                                       Executive Vice President,
                                       Finance and Administration

                                       OPTIONEE


                                       __________________________
                                       Paul B. Loyd, Jr.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

________________ Nos. 17-3752, 18-1253 , 19-1129 & 19-1189

________________

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA; STATE OF NEW JERSEY

v.

PRESIDENT UNITED STATES OF AMER ICA; SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUM AN SERVICES; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUM AN SERVICES; SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY ; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY; SECRETARY UN ITED STATES DEPARTME NT OF LABOR; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home (Intervenor in D.C.), Appellant in Nos. 17-3752 and 19-1129

Secretary United States of Department of Health and Human Serv ices, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Secretary United States Department of Treasury, United States Department of Treasury, Secretary Unite d States Department of Labor, United States Department of Labor, Appellants in Nos. 18-1253 and 19-1189

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED ST ATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA (E.D. Pa. No. 2:17-cv-04540) District Judge: Hon. Wendy Beetlestone

__________________ On Remand from the Supreme Court of the United States Submitted on Remand August 10, 2020

Before: McKEE, SHWARTZ, and FUENTES, Circuit Judges__________________

JUDGMENT ORDER

__________________ By opinion and judgment entered on Ju ly 12, 2019, this Court affirmed the

judgment of the District Court. The Little Si sters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home

and the President of the United States filed petitions for writ of certiorari with the U.S.

Supreme Court, which were granted. On Ju ly 8, 2020, the Supreme Court reversed the

judgment of this Court and remanded for further proceedings.

On consideration whereof, it is now hereby

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the judgemen t of the District Court is reversed

and the matter is remanded to the District C ourt for further proceedings. The Clerk is

directed to issue the mandate.

BY THE COURT:

s/Patty Shwartz Circuit Judge

ATTEST:

s/ Patricia S. Dodszuweit Clerk

Dated: August 20, 2020
|
|

|Energy Market and Economic Impacts of H.R. 2454, the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009                                                                         
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Figure 17.  Regional Electricity Prices in ACESA Main Cases, 2030 (2007 cents pr kilowatthour).  Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800).
|Figure 17.  Regional Electricity Prices in ACESA Main Cases, 2030 (2007 cents pr kilowatthour).  Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800).
|Figure 17.  Regional Electricity Prices in ACESA Main Cases, 2030 (2007 cents pr kilowatthour).  Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800).