alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NUMBER 13-12-00350-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

EX PARTE CHRISTOPHER CARTER

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 130th District Court

of Matagorda County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Christopher Carter, filed a pro se notice of appeal seeking to challenge 

an order denying a post-conviction writ of habeas corpus. On May 24, 2012, the Clerk of 

this Court notified appellant that it appeared that the order from which the appeal was 

taken was not an appealable order, and requested correction of this defect within ten 

days or the appeal would be dismissed. On June 7, 2012, appellant responded stating 

the Court has jurisdiction. Counsel for appellant filed a motion to withdraw and this Court 

abated and remanded this cause to the trial court.

The trial court made findings that appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, was 

not denied effective assistance of counsel, and is indigent. The trial court appointed 
2

Mary Peter Cudd to represent appellant on appeal and further found that the plea 

admonishments and judicial confession made appellant fully aware of the consequences 

of agreeing to waive any right to appeal the case. On September 27, 2012, the Clerk of 

this Court again notified appellant that it appeared that the order from which the appeal 

was taken was not an appealable order, and requested correction of this defect within ten 

days or the appeal would be dismissed. 

On October 18, 2012, counsel filed a response with this Court. Counsel=s 

response advises that she has filed a “Notice of Appeal Pending Ruling on Request for 

Permission to Appeal From Trial Court and Ruling by the Court of Criminal Appeals in 

WR-77, 647-01 and 02.” The motion requests the trial court grant permission to appeal.

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be 

dismissed if the trial court=s certification does not show that the defendant has the right of 

appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); see TEX. R. APP. P. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Appellant has not 

been granted a right to appeal. Additionally, jurisdiction to grant post-conviction habeas 

corpus relief in felony cases rests exclusively with the Texas Court of Criminal 

Appeals. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07, § 5 (West Supp. 2011); Bd. of Pardons 

& Paroles ex rel. Keene v. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Dist., 910 S.W.2d 481, 483 

(Tex. Crim. App. 1995); In re McAfee, 53 S.W .3d 715, 717–18 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st 

Dist.] 2001, orig. proceeding). Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED. 

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the 1st

day of November, 2012.
# File Information

A19 - Avg VMT by HH Comp EIA

Std Errors for A19

N Cells for A19

# A19 - Avg VMT by HH Comp EIA

# Std Errors for A19

# N Cells for A19
#### FILOMENA REES *v.*ELLEN J. VILLANO ET AL.

(AC 34753)

DiPentima, C. J., and Alvord and Harper, Js.

Argued May 28

officially released July 9, 2013

*77
      *Peter R. Stark,*with whom, on the brief, was *Edward S. Noble III,*for the appellants (defendants).

*David C. Pite,*for the appellee (plaintiff).

*Opinion*

PER CURIAM.

The defendants Ellen J. Villano and Anthony Villano appeal from the judgment of strict foreclosure rendered by the trial court in favor of the plaintiff Filomena Rees. On appeal, the defendants claim that the court improperly precluded them from presenting an expert witness. After reviewing the record and appellate briefs, we conclude that the defendants’ claim is without merit and that the court properly rendered a judgment of strict foreclosure in favor of the plaintiff.

The judgment is affirmed and the case is remanded for the purpose of setting new law days.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 58 (Wednesday, March 26, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 14412]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-7574]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP97-93-001]


Young Gas Storage Company Ltd.; Notice of Tariff Compliance 
Filing

March 20, 1997.
    Take notice that on March 17, 1997, Young Gas Storage Company Ltd. 
(Young), tendered for filing to become part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Original Volume No. 1, the tariff sheets listed in Appendix A to the 
filing, to be effective May 1, 1997.
    Young states the tariff sheets are filed in compliance with Order 
No. 587, and the order issued February 13, 1997 in Docket No. RP97-93-
000, as well as Section 154.203 of the Commission's regulations. Young 
further states the tariff sheets filed are the same as the pro forma 
tariff sheets filed by Young on November 21, 1996 to comply with Order 
No. 587 except (1) the tariff sheets have been revised to reflect 
tariff filings made between the November 21, 1996 filing and the date 
of this filing, (2) changes have been made to comply with the 
requirements of the order issued February 13, 1997 in Docket No. RP97-
93-000 and certain minor clarifications and, (3) as required in Order 
No. 587-B issued January 30, 1997, Young is incorporating by reference 
into its tariff the Electronic Delivery Mechanism (EDM) standards 
adopted in that rule.
    Young has further requested any waivers necessary to change its Gas 
Day to the GISB Standard effective April 7, 1997.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Regulations. All such protests must be filed as provided 
in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-7574 Filed 3-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
**EXHIBIT (32.1)****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Albany International Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Joseph G. Morone, Presidentand Chief Executive Officer, and Michael C. Nahl, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| (1)      | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                            |
|-------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                    |
| (2)      | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|                    |

|                       |        |                                                      |
|-----------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
| Dated: August 6, 2009 |   |                                                 |
|                  |
|                  | By     | /s/ Joseph G. Morone                                 |
|                  |   | Joseph G. Morone                                     |
|                  |   | President and Chief Executive Officer                |
|                  |   | (Principal Executive Officer)                        |
|                  |
|                  |
|                  | By     | /s/ Michael C. Nahl                                  |
|                  |   | Michael C. Nahl                                      |
|                  |   | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|                  |   | (Principal Financial Officer)                        |

----
<PAGE>
                                                                 Exhibit 23



The Board of Directors
Rollins Truck Leasing Corp.:


       We consent to incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
33-67682 filed on Form S-3 by Rollins Truck Leasing Corp. of our report dated
October 22, 1996, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Rollins
Truck Leasing Corp. and subsidiaries as of September 30, 1996 and 1995 and
the related consolidated statements of earnings and cash flows and related
schedules for each of the years in the three-year period ended September 30,
1996, which report appears on page 10 of this 1996 Annual Report on Form 10-K
of Rollins Truck Leasing Corp.






                                                 KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
November 25, 1996
EXHIBIT 99.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




      In  connection   with  the  Quarterly   Report  of  Provident   Bankshares
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, Gary N. Geisel, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,
to the best of my knowledge and belief,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
             15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        2.   The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
             material   respects,   the  financial   condition  and  results  of
             operations  of the Company as of and for the period  covered by the
             Report.




                               /s/ Gary N. Geisel
                               Gary N. Geisel
                               Chief Executive Officer
                               May 14, 2003



       A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906
        HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO PROVIDENT BANKSHARES CORPORATION AND WILL BE
       RETAINED BY PROVIDENT BANKSHARES CORPORATION AND FURNISHED TO THE
         SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
**Exhibit      10.3**

**INDEMNIFICATION      AGREEMENT**

----

| If                to Indemnitor:           | InnSuites                Hospitality Trust1615 E. Northern                AvenueSuite 102Phoenix,                Arizona  85020Attention:                President             |
|--------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  with                a copy to:  |  James B.                Aronoff, Esq.Thompson                Hine LLP3900 Key                Center127 Public                SquareCleveland,                Ohio  44114 |
| If                to the Indemnitee:       |                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
| with                a copy to:        |                                                                                                                                                                                                    |

----

|   | INDEMNITOR:                                |
|--------|--------------------------------------------|
|   |                                       |
|   | INNSUITES                HOSPITALITY TRUST |
|   |                                       |
|   |                                       |
|   |                                       |
|   | By:                                   |

|   | INDEMNITEE: |
|--------|-------------|
|   |        |
|   |        |
|   |        |
|   |        |
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Provident Bankshares Corporation (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Gary N. Geisel, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Gary N. GeiselGary N. Geisel Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of
the Board


May 10, 2006
#### Natasha SHPAK; et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Malcolm CURTIS and Judith Curtis, Defendants-Appellants, and Belzona Systems of California, Inc.; et al., Defendants.

No. 16-56323

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted February 8, 2018 * Pasadena, California

Filed February 12, 2018

Randy Kornfeld, Kornfeld and Associates, New York, NY, for Plaintiffs-Appel-lees

Rebekah L. Parker, Bankruptcy Counsel, Law Office of Rebekah L. Parker, Oceanside, CA, for Defendants-Appellants

Rebekah L. Parker, Bankruptcy Counsel, Law Office of Rebekah L. Parker, Oceanside, CA, for Defendants

Before: GRABER and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges, and MARBLEY, ** District Judge.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

**

 The Honorable Algenon L. Marbley, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Ohio, sitting by designation.

ORDER ***

This is an appeal from the district court’s rejection of a “notice of removal,” which sought to “remove” an action pending in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York to the Central District of California. The notice, however denominated, was in substance a motion to transfer venue under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), and the district court’s order thus effectively was a denial of the requested transfer. That order was not a final judgment under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. *See Pac. Car & Foundry Co. v. Pence,*403 F.2d 949, 951 (9th Cir. 1968) (“[Ojrders respecting venue entered under § 1404(a) and § 1406(a) are interlocutory in nature and are not appealable prior to final judgment.”). We therefore dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. This order shall constitute the mandate of this court.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Hugh Mullins, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Harold's
Stores, Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14)
for the registrant and we have:

a)	designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared.

b)	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures; and

c)	presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as
of the end of the period covered by this report based on our
evaluation; and

d)	disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant's fourth quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting;

5.	The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors
and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)	all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the
registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal
controls; and

b)	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal controls; and

6.	The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in
this quarterly report whether or not there were any significant
changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of
our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: June 15, 2004

						 /s/ Hugh Mullins
Hugh Mullins, President and Chief
Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 25, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

137098 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 137098 

 COA: 278797 

Oakland CC: 07-212591-FC 

LEEATRICE DEMAR WILLIAMS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 22, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

1117 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 25, 2008 

 Clerk
# t34p01p1
# C_2022237EN.01007801.xml

| 20.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 237/78 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 237/78

---

Action brought on 9 May 2022 — Groschopp v EUIPO (Sustainability through Quality)

(Case T-253/22)

(2022/C 237/99)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Groschopp AG Drives & More (Viersen, Germany) (represented by: R. Schiffer, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘Sustainability through Quality’ — Application for registration No 18 158 368

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 1 March 2022 in Case R 1076/2020-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       68
<ALLOWANCES>                                        10
<INVENTORY>                                        529
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,994
<PP&E>                                           2,342
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,227
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  19,310
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,729
<BONDS>                                          4,861
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,885
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    19,310
<SALES>                                          5,716
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,716
<CGS>                                            1,353
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,353
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,808
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 426
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (679)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (160)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (519)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       3
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (516)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (4.74)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (4.74)


</TABLE>