alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32(b)**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350**





I,
      Jeffrey R. Passmore, the principal financial officer of Hallmark Financial
      Services, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify that the accompanying report
      on
      Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, and filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934, as amended. I further certify that the information contained in
      the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
      results of operations of the Company.




Date:
                November 12, 2008/s/
                Jeffrey R. PassmoreJeffrey
                R. Passmore,Principal
                Financial Officer
No. 12-5025.

#### Cole *v.*Bowersox, Warden.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-7882.

#### Williams *v.*Wetzel, Secretary, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
**Summary of Metals Analysis**

**Plant:** Hanson Brick **Date:** 8/17/2010

**Run #4** PW & Filter Imps 1 & 2 Imps 3 &4 Total

Antimony, ug(<0.005) (<0.007) (<0.012) Arsenic, ug (<0.002) (<0.003) (<0.005) Berylium, ug(<0.002) (<0.003) (<0.005) Cadmium, ug(<0.002) (<0.003) (<0.005) Chromium, ug 0.003 0.005 0.008 Cobalt, ug (<0.002) (<0.003) (<0.005) Lead, ug (<0.002) (<0.003) (<0.005) Manganese, ug 0.021 0.003 0.024 Nickel, ug 0.002 0.003 0.005 Selenium, ug 0.011 0.007 0.018 Mercury, ug 0.00003 0.00362 0.00058 0.00423

**Run #5** PW & Filter Imps 1 & 2 Imps 3 &4 Total

Antimony, ug(<0.005) (<0.007) (<0.012) Arsenic, ug (<0.002) (<0.003) (<0.005) Berylium, ug(<0.002) (<0.003) (<0.005) Cadmium, ug(<0.002) (<0.003) (<0.005) Chromium, ug 0.007 0.004 0.011 Cobalt, ug (<0.002) (<0.003) (<0.005) Lead, ug (<0.002) (<0.003) (<0.005) Manganese, ug 0.012 0.08 0.092 Nickel, ug 0.003 0.01 0.013 Selenium, ug 0.007 (<0.007) 0.007 Mercury, ug(<0.00002) 0.00449 0.00056 0.00505

**Run #6** PW & Filter Imps 1 & 2 Imps 3 &4 Total

Antimony, ug(<0.005) (<0.007) (<0.012) Arsenic, ug (<0.002) (<0.003) (<0.005) Berylium, ug(<0.002) (<0.003) (<0.005) Cadmium, ug(<0.002) (<0.003) (<0.005) Chromium, ug 0.005 0.003 0.008 Cobalt, ug (<0.002) (<0.003) (<0.005) Lead, ug (<0.002) (<0.003) (<0.005) Manganese, ug 0.018 0.018 0.036 Nickel, ug 0.006 0.003 0.009 Selenium, ug 0.008 0.007 0.015 Mercury, ug(<0.00002) 0.00454 0.00063 0.00517
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND> THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
 CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE  SHEET AS OF  DECEMBER 31,  1997  AND THE  CONSOLIDATED
 STATEMENT OF  OPERATIONS  FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 
 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                         DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                    15,560
<SECURITIES>                              21,078
<RECEIVABLES>                                519
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          37,320
<PP&E>                                    18,304
<DEPRECIATION>                            14,472
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            48,303
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      2,278
<BONDS>                                        0
<COMMON>                                      21
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                46,004
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              48,303
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           7,653
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             6
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (7,870)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (7,870)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                              (7,870)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              (0.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                              (0.38)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



I, Susan E. Basting, certify that:



(1) I have reviewed this quarter report on Form 10-Q of National Housing Trust Limited Partnership;



(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



(4) The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being
prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(5) The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                  |  |    |  |                                           
|----------------- |  | -- |  | ------------------------------------------
|Date May 17, 2004 |  | By |  | /s/ Susan E. Basting                      
|                  |  |    |  | Susan E. Basting, Treasurer               
|                  |  |    |  | and Chief Financial Officer               
|                  |  |    |  | NHT, Inc., General Partner for            
|                  |  |    |  | National Housing Trust Limited Partnership
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 48 (Wednesday, March 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 11427]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6124]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP97-60-002]


Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company; Notice of Tariff Filing

March 6, 1997.
    Take notice that on March 3, 1997, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company 
(Tennessee) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, the 
revised tariff sheets listed on Appendix A to the filing.
    Tennessee states that the filing is being filed in compliance with 
the Commission's directives in Order Nos. 587 and 587-B, and the 
Commission's January 8, 1997 order in this proceeding. Tennessee 
proposes an effective date of May 1, 1997 for the revised sheets.
    Tennessee states that the revised tariff sheets reflect the changes 
to Tennessee's tariff that result from the Gas Industry Standards 
Board's (GISB) consensus standards that were adopted by the Commission 
in Order Nos. 587 and 587-B. The filed tariff sheets also reflect the 
changes required by the January 8, 1997 order to the pro forma sheets 
in Tennessee's November 1, 1996 GISB compliance filing.
    Tennessee states that copies of the filing have been mailed to all 
affected customers and state regulatory commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Regulations. All such protests must be filed on or before 
March 21, 1997. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to this proceeding. Copies of this filing are 
on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in 
the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-6124 Filed 3-11-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47. 4 ( di st i ngui shi ng o pi ni ons a nd m em ora ndum opi ni ons)

, 52. 8( d) ( “ W hen 1

de ny i ng rel i ef, t he co urt m ay ha nd do w n a n o pi ni on bu t i s no t requ i red t o d o s o.” ). 

### NUM BER 13-08- 0049 9-CV



## COURT OF A PP EA LS

T H I R T E E N T H D I S T R I C T O F T E X AS

CORPUS CHRI ST I

- E DI NBURG

IN RE: JUA N GUTIERREZ A ND GUA DA LUPE SA UCEDA

On Peti tion for Wr it of M andamus and

M ot ion fo r Emerg en cy T emp orary

R elief



## ME MOR A N D U M OP I N I ON

B ef o re J u st ic es R o d rig u ez , G ar za , a n d V el a

M emo rand um Opin ion Pe r Cu riam 1

Rel ator s, Juan Guti er re z and Guadal upe Sa uceda , fil ed a petition for w ri t of

ma nda mu s and a mo tion f or em ergency relief , by w hich th ey request that this Court direct

re sp o n d e n ts/ re al par

ti es in int er est to v er ify

si g natur es on a peti ti on s eeki ng to submi t a

bal lot i nit iat iv e pr oposi ng an amendment t o the H ar li ng en C it y C har ter

. Res pondent s/r eal

par ti es in int er est , t he C it y of Har li ng en, S y lv ia Trev ino , C hr is Bos w ell , Lar ry Gal br eath,

Bobby F ar ri s, Jay Me a de, R ober t Leftw ic h, an d Thomas Hus hen, filed a r espon se on

Aug ust 25, 2008 w hic h, inter alia , requests tha t this Court aw ard sanctions against relators.

See T EX

. R. A PP . P. 52.1 12

T he Cou rt, having f ully

ex am ined and conside red the petitio n f or w rit of man dam us,

the mot ion f or em ergency relief , and t h e r e spon se the reto, is of th e op inion th at relato rs

hav e not sh ow n the msel v es enti tl ed to the re lie f s o u ght. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52 .8(a).

Accordin gly , the petitio n f or w rit of man dam us an d the mot ion f or em er ge n c y r e lief are

DE NI ED

. Mo re ov er , w e deny the re q uest for s anct ion s made by respo ndents /r eal par ti es

in int er est

.

PER C UR IAM

Me moran dum Opi nio n del iv er ed and filed

on th e 26t h day

of Aug ust , 200 8.
State of Washington

40 CFR 52 – Subpart WW Materials Incorporated by Reference
40 CFR 52.2470(c) and (d) October 7, 2014

US EPA Region 10 Office of Air, Waste, and Toxics 1200 Sixth Avenue Seattle, WA 98101
OAR Box 1828 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

123) ll-K- (B) -112 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 11/12/2008 11:12:52 AM Sheet 123 of 325 

P.1 
P.2 

A\ Pl 

II-K-(B)-112 

^jrsEC_I 

COMPARISON OF INDUSTRIAL NATURAL GAS PRICE AND 

FOSSIL FUEL CONSUMPTION PROJECTIONS 

Letter from T. Hogan, EEA to R. Short, EPA:EAB 

May 25, 1983 

THIS INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND IN DOCKET A-79-02, ITEM 

II-K-(B)-108
# C_2022340EN.01004301.xml

| 5.9.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 340/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.9.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 340/43

---

Order of the General Court of 6 July 2022 — Perez Lopes Pargana Calado v Court of Justice of the European Union

(Case T-31/22) (1)

(Public procurement of services - Withdrawal of the contested decisions - No need to adjudicate)

(2022/C 340/60)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Applicant: Ana Teresa Perez Lopes Pargana Calado (Lisbon, Portugal) (represented by: Marques Matias, lawyer)

Defendant: Court of Justice of the European Union (represented by: J. Inghelram and Á. Almendros Manzano, acting as Agents)

Re:

By her action brought, in essence, under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decisions of the Court of Justice of the European Union rejecting her applications to participate in the public procurement procedure for the translation of legal texts from certain official languages of the European Union into Portuguese.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | The Court shall bear its own costs and those incurred by Ms Ana Teresa Perez Lopes Pargana Calado. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Court shall bear its own costs and those incurred by Ms Ana Teresa Perez Lopes Pargana Calado.

---

(1)  OJ C 158, 11.4.2022.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           9
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                  2,945
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                  505
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                        4,633
<TRADING-ASSETS>                        0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>             27,710
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                  2,462
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                    2,473
<LOANS>                                 58,732   
<ALLOWANCE>                             429
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          104,347
<DEPOSITS>                              91,806
<SHORT-TERM>                            0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                     925
<LONG-TERM>                             172
<COMMON>                                252
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<OTHER-SE>                              11,192
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>          104,347
<INTEREST-LOAN>                         1,324
<INTEREST-INVEST>                       465
<INTEREST-OTHER>                        75 
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                        1,864
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                      983  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      986  
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                   878  
<LOAN-LOSSES>                           101
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                      2  
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                         660  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         204
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>              204
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                            155
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           .39
<EPS-DILUTED>                           .39
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                          4.02
<LOANS-NON>                             225
<LOANS-PAST>                            162
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                        0  
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                         0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                        426
<CHARGE-OFFS>                           99
<RECOVERIES>                            1 
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                       429
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                    429   
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                     0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                 0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

DOUGLAS BARRETT, § § No. 431, 2013 Defendant Below, § Appellant, § Court Below–Superior Court § of the State of Delaware in and v. § for New Castle County § STATE OF DELAWARE, § § Plaintiff Below, § Cr. ID No. 1009013741 Appellee. § Submitted: May 9, 2014 Decided: July 21, 2014 Before STRINE , Chief Justice, HOLLAND and RIDGELY , Justices. O R D E R This 21 st day of July 2014, upon consideration of the briefs and supplemental memoranda of the parties and the Super ior Court record, it appears to the Court that: (1) On February 8, 2011, the appellant, Douglas Bar rett, pled guilty to a drug-related offense and was sentenced to thre e years at Level V suspended for twelve months at Level III. On June 22, 2011, Barrett was found guilty of his second violation of probation ( VOP) and was sentenced to two years, eleven months and twenty-three days a t Level V suspended for the same period of time at Level IV CREST, a substa nce abuse treatment2

program, suspended upon successful completion of th e program for twelve months at Level III. (2) On March 28, 2013, Barrett filed a motion for c orrection of sentence seeking credit for time served at a Level IV VOP Center. By order dated July 26, 2013, the Superior Court ruled that Barrett was “entitled to credit for time served in [the] VOP Center” but was “not entitled to credit for time spent in L4 treatment, e.g., CREST, even i f CREST shares space at [the] VOP Center.” (3) Barrett filed an appeal from the Superior Court ’s denial of credit for time served in the CREST program at the VOP Center. On appeal, we are constrained to find that the Superior Court’ s denial of credit for time served was an abuse of discretion. (4) A defendant is entitled to Level V credit for t ime served at a Level V facility and at a Level IV VOP Center. 1 Credit for time served at a Level V facility includes any time spent in a subst ance abuse treatment program while at that facility and should also incl ude any time spent in a substance abuse treatment program while at a Level IV VOP Center. 2

1 Anderson v. State , 2006 WL 3931460 (Del. Dec. 5, 2006). 2 See, e.g., Mifflin v. State , 2014 WL 1092283 (Del. Mar. 18, 2014) (affirming V OP sentence giving credit for time spent at a Level V substance abuse treatment program).3

NOW, THEREFORE IT IS ORDERED that the Superior Cour t judgment is REVERSED and this case is REMANDED to t he Superior Court for correction of sentence.
BY THE COURT: /s/ Henry duPont Ridgely Justice
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-FAA 2013 XXXX Directorate Identifier: 2013-NE-10-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered 

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Replace waste gate 

controller 1.0 $ 85.00 $231 $ 316.00 72 $22,752.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $22,752

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours 

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): N/A
Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
# Historically Black College and University Capital Financing Program

- Department of Education Discharges Over $1.6 billion in HBCU Capital Finance Debt The U.S. Department of Education recently discharged approximately $1.6 billion of debt provided to Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) that participate in the HBCU Capital Financing Program. This action will provide debt relief to 45 HBCUs – 13 public institutions and 32 private institutions.
Geospatial Corporation S-1 


Exhibit 4.3


 


 


not valid unless countersigned
by transfer agent. incorporated under the laws of the state of nevada. pd1503 geospatial holdings authorized series “b”
convertible preferred stock: 5,000,000 shares par value: $0,001 this certifies that is the record holder of series “b”
convertible preferred shares of geospatial holdings, inc. transferable on the books of the corporation in person or by duly authorized
attorney upon surrender of this certificate properly endorsed. this certificate is not valid until countersigned by the transfer
agent and registered by the registrar. witness the facsimile seal of the corporation and the facsimile signatures of its duly
authorized officers. dated: secretary president interwest transfer co. inc. p.o. box 171361 salt lake city, utah 84117 countersigned
& registered countersigned transfer agent-authorized signature


 



    	 



    	 



    

 





the following abbreviations,
when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according
to applicable laws or regulations. ten com - as tenants in common ten ent - as tenants by the entireties jt ten - as joint tenants
with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common unif gift min act – custodian (cust) (minor) under uniform gifts
to minors (state) additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. hereby sell, assign and transfer unto
for value received, please insert social security or other identifying number of assignee (please print or typewrite name and
address, including zip code, of assignee) shares of the capital stock represented by the within certificate, and do hereby irrevocably
constitute and appoint attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the within named corporation with full power of substitution
in the premises. dated notice: the signature to this assignment must correspond with the name as written upon the face of the
certificate in every particular without alteration or enlargement or any change whatever notice signature guaranteed: signature(s)
must be guaranteed by a firm which is a member of a registered national stock exchange, or by a bank (other than a savings bank).
or a trust company. the guaranteeing firm must be a member of the medallion guarantee program transfer fee will apply for medallion
guarantee use only
# Data for Table B38

# RSEs for Table B38