alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
E**XHIBIT 31.1RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERI, Timothy W. Byrne, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of United States Lime & Minerals, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information;and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Dated: March 14, 2007 /s/ Timothy W. Byrne   Timothy W. Byrne   President and Chief Executive Officer  
 **
# C_2022213EN.01004701.xml

| 30.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 213/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 213/47

---

Action brought on 12 April 2022 — Banque Postale v ECB

(Case T-190/22)

(2022/C 213/65)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: La Banque Postale (Paris, France) (represented by: A. Gossett-Grainville, M. Trabucchi and M. Dalon, lawyers)

Defendant: European Central Bank

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul section 1.2 and sections 3.2.1 to 3.2.8 of ECB decision No ECB-SSM-2022-FRBPL-1 of 2 February 2022 (together with its annexes), in so far as it prescribes measures to be taken in relation to irrevocable payment commitments concerning the deposit guarantee schemes or resolution funds; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul section 1.2 and sections 3.2.1 to 3.2.8 of ECB decision No ECB-SSM-2022-FRBPL-1 of 2 February 2022 (together with its annexes), in so far as it prescribes measures to be taken in relation to irrevocable payment commitments concerning the deposit guarantee schemes or resolution funds;

| — | order the defendant to pay all the costs |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay all the costs

| — | adopt, under Articles 88 and 89 of the Rules of Procedure, a measure of organisation of procedure seeking to have the ECB disclose the decisions concerning irrevocable payment commitments taken in respect of other banking institutions for 2021, particularly those relating to the other French banking institutions. |
| --- | --- |

—

adopt, under Articles 88 and 89 of the Rules of Procedure, a measure of organisation of procedure seeking to have the ECB disclose the decisions concerning irrevocable payment commitments taken in respect of other banking institutions for 2021, particularly those relating to the other French banking institutions.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants rely on four pleas in law which are identical or similar to those relied upon in Case T-186/22, BNP Paribas v European Central Bank.

---
# 1991
U.S. Energy Information Administration Quarterly Coal Report, October - December 2023

Table 22. Average price of U.S. coke imports

(dollars per short ton)

Year to date

Continent and country

of origin

October - December

2023

July - September

2023

October - December

2022 2023 2022

Percent

change

North America Total 381.01 493.42 350.64 419.88 438.47 -4.2

Canada 381.01 493.42 350.64 419.88 438.47 -4.2

South America Total - - - 352.18 - -

Brazil - - - 740.32 - -

Colombia - - - 349.28 - -

Europe Total 456.78 454.64 456.89 463.96 457.39 1.4

Czech Republic 436.01 454.47 456.41 445.33 456.40 -2.4

Germany, Federal

Republic of

- 642.29 1,360.50 717.23 1,360.50 -47.3

Netherlands - - - - 416.19 -

Poland 477.44 - - 482.50 - -

United Kingdom - - 1,550.00 1,669.23 1,154.38 44.6

Asia Total 7,395.00 1,022.76 5,610.00 904.77 1,759.82 -48.6

China - 1,022.76 - 1,783.07 1,780.78 0.1

India - - - 933.78 1,126.19 -17.1

Indonesia - - - 2,788.46 - -

Japan 7,395.00 - 5,610.00 4,429.00 5,610.00 -21.1

United Arab Emirates - - - 420.73 - -

Africa Total 634.87 869.33 604.75 696.04 514.81 35.2

Mozambique - - 448.92 469.64 406.67 15.5

South Africa 634.87 869.33 613.46 697.37 519.99 34.1

U.S. Total 453.77 491.58 482.08 460.77 508.41 -9.4

- = No data reported.

Note: Total may not equal sum of components because of independent rounding.

Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, 'Monthly Report IM 145.'
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 7448

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. FREDERICK GASTON BROWN, JR. , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk

. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. ( 2:90

- cr
- 00149

- RGD

- 3 )

Submitted : March 31, 2020 Decided: April 2, 2020

Before NIEMEYER, FLOYD, and RUSHING , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Frederick Gaston Brown, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Frederick Gaston Brown, Jr., appeals the district court’s orde r denying his 18 U.S. C. § 3582(c)(1)(B) (2018) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Brown , No. 2:90

- cr
- 00149

- RGD

- 3 (E.D. Va. Sept. 19, 201 9) . We deny Brown’s motion to appoint
counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
**Exhibit
      21.2**





**Puget
      Sound Energy, Inc.**





**SUBSIDIARIES**





|1. | Hydro
              Energy Development Corporation (HEDC)
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------

10885
      N.E. Fourth Street, Suite 1200


Bellevue,
      Washington 98004-5515





|2. | Puget
              Western, Inc.
|-- | ---------------------------------

19515
      North Creek Parkway


Suite
      310


Bothell,
      Washington 98011





|3. | WNG
              CAP I, Inc.
|-- | -----------------------------

c/o
      James
      W. Eldredge


10885
      N.E. Fourth Street, Suite 1200


Bellevue,
      Washington 98004-5515





|4. | Rainier
              Receivables, Inc.
|-- | ---------------------------------------

c/o
      James
      W. Eldredge


10885
      N.E. Fourth Street, Suite 1200


Bellevue,
      Washington 98004-5515





|5. | PSE
              Funding, Inc.
|-- | -------------------------------

c/o
      James
      W. Eldredge


10885
      N.E. Fourth Street, Suite 1200


Bellevue,
      Washington 98004-5515
EAC Decision on Request for Interpretation 2007-03, 

2005 VVSG Vol. 1 Section 3.1.1 

Date: 

September 5, 2007 

Question: 

Does Vol. 1 Section 3.1.1 of the 2005 VVSG require the manufacturer to submit the 

summative usability testing report to the VSTL conducting the testing of the voting 

system or to the EAC? 

Facts: 

The 2005 VVSG requires all manufacturers to conduct summative usability testing in 

order to ensure that the voting system meets the usability requirements of the 2005 

VVSG. Currently it is the practice of the manufacturers to submit the usability test report 

as part of the technical data package submitted to the EAC, which is consistent with the 

stated requirement of the 2005 VVSG. The VSTL does not currently receive the 

usability test report and is only responsible for checking to make sure the usability testing 

was conducted. 

Section of Standards or Guidelines: 

Section 3.1.1 of the 2005 VVSG Vol. 1 reads: 

The vendor shall conduct summative usability tests on the voting system 

using individuals representative of the general population. The vendor 

shall document the testing performed and report the test results using the 

Common Industry Format. This documentation shall be included in the 

Technical Data Package submitted to the EAC for national certification. 

Conclusion: 

The EAC concludes that manufacturers must submit the summative usability test report 

required by Section 3.1.1 of the 2005 VVSG Vol. 1 to the VSTL for review. In addition, 
the usability test report shall be submitted to the EAC as part of the documentation 

manufacturers are required to file with the application to test a voting system. This 

interpretation is consistent with the intent of the requirement which was to ensure that the 

voting system meets the usability requirements of the 2005 VVSG. Consistent with the 

2005 VVSG the manufacturer must submit the usability test report to the VSTL as part of 

the technical data package submitted to the laboratory. The VSTL will then check the 

technical data package to ensure that the report is present and reported in the common 

industry format. If the VSTL finds the usability test report to be inconsistent with the 

common industry format the VSTL shall note the discrepancy in its final report to the 

EAC.
<PAGE>


Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Arrhythmia Research
Technology, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned President, Chief Operating Officer and Acting Chief
Financial Officer, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/  James E. Rouse
-------------------
James E. Rouse
President, Chief Operating Officer and
Acting Chief Financial Officer

Date: November 12, 2002
No. 11-11087.

#### Marti *v.*Fairman, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# C_2022451EN.01001901.xml

| 28.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 451/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 451/19

---

Action brought on 10 October 2022 — Vi.ni.ca.v EUIPO — Venica & Venica (agricolavinica. Le Colline di Ripa)

(Case T-627/22)

(2022/C 451/23)

Language in which the application was lodged: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Vi.ni.ca. Srl — soc. agr. (Ripalimosani, Italy) (represented by: S. Di Pardo, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Venica & Venica di Gianni e Giorgio Venica Ss soc. agr. (Dolegna del Collio, Italy)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark ‘agricolavinica. Le Colline di Ripa’ in white, black, red and green colours — EU trade mark No 18 196 079

Proceedings before EUIPO: Invalidity proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 July 2022 in Case R 90/2022-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul or in any case amend the contested decision, declaring that the contested mark ‘agricolavinica. Le Colline di Ripa’ is valid since it has no similarity, visually, phonetically, or conceptually, to the earlier mark VENICA and since no risk of confusion between such marks exists; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul or in any case amend the contested decision, declaring that the contested mark ‘agricolavinica. Le Colline di Ripa’ is valid since it has no similarity, visually, phonetically, or conceptually, to the earlier mark VENICA and since no risk of confusion between such marks exists;

| — | order the defendant and the other party to the proceedings to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant and the other party to the proceedings to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
# decline parameters

# example

Monthly production profile (b/d)

month of production

# image1.png
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1244 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 1244

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      December 3, 2020.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (H.R. 3884) to decriminalize and deschedule 
cannabis, to provide for reinvestment in certain persons adversely impacted by 
the War on Drugs, to provide for expungement of certain cannabis offenses, and 
for other purposes. All points of order against consideration of the bill are 
waived. In lieu of the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by 
the Committee on the Judiciary now printed in the bill, an amendment in the 
nature of a substitute consisting of the text of Rules Committee Print 116-67, 
modified by the amendment printed in the report of the Committee on Rules 
accompanying this resolution, shall be considered as adopted. The bill, as 
amended, shall be considered as read. All points of order against provisions in 
the bill, as amended, are waived. The previous question shall be considered as 
ordered on the bill, as amended, and on any further amendment thereto, to final 
passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally 
divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee 
on the Judiciary; and (2) one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1273 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1273

            Nullifying the impeachment of Donald John Trump.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 31, 2020

Mr. King of Iowa submitted the following resolution; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
            Nullifying the impeachment of Donald John Trump.

Whereas the U.S. Constitution states that ``The President, Vice President and 
        all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on 
        Impeachment for, and conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high 
        Crimes and Misdemeanors''; and
Whereas President Donald J. Trump committed no such impeachable offense and has 
        been exonerated and acquitted after a baseless, unconstitutional sham 
        impeachment: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the impeachment of Donald John Trump, President of 
the United States, is nullified, as if such impeachment had not 
occurred, due to a lack of a constitutional basis for such impeachment, 
the House of Representatives having failed to substantiate its 
allegations of Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors, 
which is required by the United States Constitution.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 48 (Wednesday, March 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11421-11422]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6109]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. TM97-4-32-000]


Colorado Interstate Gas Company; Notice of Tariff Filing

March 6, 1997.
    Take notice that on February 28, 1997, Colorado Interstate Gas 
Company (CIG) filed Third Revised Sheet No. 11A of its FERC Gas Tariff 
and First Revised Fourth Revised Sheet No. 230, First Revised Volume 
No. 1, which it has designated as the ``Primary Case'', reflecting a 
decrease in its fuel reimbursement percentage for Lost, Unaccounted-For 
and Other Fuel Gas from 0.71% to 0.68% effective April 1, 1997.
    CIG also filed as an ``Alternate Case'', which proposed changes in 
its FERC Gas Tariff, Substitute Third Revised Sheet No. 11A, First 
Revised Volume No. 1, reflecting a decrease in the fuel reimbursement 
percentage for Lost, Unaccounted-For and Other Fuel Gas from 0.71% to 
0.70% effective April 1, 1997.

[[Page 11422]]

    CIG states that copies of this filing have been served on CIG's 
jurisdictional customers and public bodies.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.211 and 385.214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR Sections 385.214 and 385.211). 
All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with Section 
154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by 
the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but 
will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any 
person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. 
Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available 
for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-6109 Filed 3-11-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1184 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require the Clerk 

to read the Congressional Budget Office cost estimate of any bill immediately after the reading of the title of the bill. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 9, 2020 

Mr. BURCHETT submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to 

require the Clerk to read the Congressional Budget Office cost estimate of any bill immediately after the reading of the title of the bill. 

1 Resolved, That clause 3 of rule II of the Rules of the 

2 House of Representatives is amended by inserting at the 

3 end the following new paragraph: 

4 ‘‘(l) After the reading of a bill title, the Clerk shall 

5 read the estimated cost, if any, of such bill as determined 

6 by the Director of the Congressional Budget Office.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the balance
sheet as of March 31, 2000, and statements of operations for the 9 months ended
March 31, 2000, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                             772
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,159
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     45,871
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                48,802
<PP&E>                                         154,319
<DEPRECIATION>                                 126,438
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  77,683
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,477,164
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,742
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,406,223)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    77,683
<SALES>                                         80,189
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                80,189
<CGS>                                           37,130
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   37,130
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              40,942
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (158,102)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (158,102)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (158,102)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
|
|

|Energy Market and Economic Impacts of H.R. 2454, the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009    
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Table ES1. Summary Results.  Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800.
|Table ES1. Summary Results.  Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800.
|Table ES1. Summary Results.  Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800.
|Table ES1. Summary Results.  Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800.
No. 12-5038.

#### Mangum *v.*Clarke, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.