alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 47 (Tuesday, March 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 11172]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5937]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. CP97-266-000]


Williams Natural Gas Company; Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

March 5, 1997.
    Take notice that on February 25, 1997, Williams Natural Gas Company 
(WNG), One Williams Center, P.O. Box 3288, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74101, filed 
in Docket No. CP97-266-000 a request pursuant to Sections 157.205, 
157.212, and 157.216 of the Commission's Regulations under the Natural 
Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205, 157.212, 157.216) for authorization to 
relocate the Western Resources, Inc. (WRI) Capron, Oklahoma and Kiowa, 
Kansas town borders from the Pampa 20-inch pipeline to an adjacent 4-
inch pipeline and then to abandon the delivery of gas from the Pampa 
20-inch pipeline, located in Alfalfa County, Oklahoma, under WNG's 
blanket certificate issued in Docket No. CP82-479-000, pursuant to 
Section 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act, all as more fully set forth in the 
request that is on file with the Commission and open to public 
inspection.
    WNG proposes to deliver gas from the new 4-inch pipeline to the 
Kiowa town border, located in Barber County, Kansas and the Capron town 
border, located in Woods County, Oklahoma and then to abandon the 
delivery of gas from the 20-inch pipeline, located in Alfalfa County, 
Oklahoma.
    WNG states that the volumes delivered from the new 4-inch pipeline 
will be the same as those currently delivered from the 20-inch 
pipeline. WNG asserts that most recent peak day and annual deliveries 
for the Kiowa town border are 18 Dth and 2,286 Dth, respectively, and 
for the Capron town border are 688 Dth and 85,834 Dth, respectively. 
WNG declares the total volume to be delivered under the authorization 
requested herein will not exceed the total volume authorized, since no 
change in volume is anticipated.
    WNG states there will be no change to facilities or location for 
either the Kiowa or Capron town borders, simply service from a 
different pipeline, with the total project cost estimated to be 
$56,552.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of 
the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefore, 
the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-5937 Filed 3-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 53 (Wednesday, March 19, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 12981]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6891]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1

[REG-249819-96, REG-209762-95]
RIN 1545-AU67, 1545-AT32


Reorganizations; Receipt of Securities and Allocations of 
Depreciation Recapture Among Partners in a Partnership; Hearing 
Cancellation

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service, Treasury.

ACTION: Cancellation of notices of public hearing on proposed 
rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document provides notice of cancellation of public 
hearings on proposed regulations relating to the receipt, as part of a 
reorganization, of rights to acquire stock of a corporation that is a 
party to the reorganization and the allocation of depreciation 
recapture among partners in a partnership.

DATES: The public hearings originally scheduled for March 25, 1997, and 
March 27, 1997, respectively, beginning at 10 a.m., are cancelled.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Evangelista C. Lee of the Regulations 
Unit, Assistant Chief Counsel (Corporate), (202) 622-7190 (not a toll 
free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The subject of the public hearings is 
proposed amendments to the Income Tax Regulations under sections 354, 
355, 356, 704 and 1245 of the Internal Revenue Code. A notice of public 
hearing appearing in the Federal Register on Monday, December 23, 1996 
(61 FR 67508) and Thursday, December 12, 1996 (61 FR 65371), announced 
that a public hearing would be held on Tuesday, March 25, 1997, and 
Thursday, March 27, 1997, beginning at 10 a.m., in room 3313, Internal 
Revenue Building, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20224.
    The public hearings scheduled for Tuesday, March 25, 1997, and 
Thursday, March 27, 1997, respectively, are cancelled.
Cynthia E. Grigsby,
Chief, Regulations Unit, Assistant Chief Counsel (Corporate).
[FR Doc. 97-6891 Filed 3-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-U
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>     1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-03-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-05-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-04-1997
<CASH>                                             154
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,184
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (514)
<INVENTORY>                                      4,460
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,504
<PP&E>                                           3,802
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,589
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,466
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,170
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            68
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,911
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,466
<SALES>                                          3,494
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,494
<CGS>                                            2,121
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,355
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     2
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  26
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    111
<INCOME-TAX>                                       111
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                111
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       111
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        

</TABLE>
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15A1110. RICHARD D. BRADSHAW v. THE STATE.

Richard Bradshaw pled guilty to child molestation. He later filed pro se

motions to withdraw his guilty plea and for “document and record at government

expense.” By separate orders entered on July 23, 2014, the trial court denied both

motions. On September 3, 2014, Bradshaw filed a pro se notice of appeal indicating

his wish to appeal both orders of July 23, 2014. We, however, lack jurisdiction.

A notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of the entry of the order sought

to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). “The proper and timely filing of a notice of

appeal is an absolute requirement to confer jurisdiction upon an appellate court.”

(Citation and punctuation omitted.) Perlman v. Perlman, 318 Ga. App. 731, 739 (4)

(734 SE2d 560) (2012). Because Bradshaw filed his notice of appeal 42 days after

entry of the orders he seeks to appeal, this appeal is untimely. It is therefore

DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

03/05/2015

March 05, 2015
# mecs54
#### DANIEL CARNIERO *v.*COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

(AC 35502)

Gruendel, Sheldon and Keller, Js.

Submitted on briefs March 14

officially released April 8, 2014

Per Curiam.

The appeal is dismissed.
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 13

- 00573

- CR

Broderick Lamond Gamble

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From County Criminal Court No. 5

o f T arrant County (1289513 )

January 15, 2015

P er C uriam

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
#### PATRICK NEMHARD *v.*COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

(AC 21095)

Schaller, Dranginis and O’Connell, Js.

Submitted on briefs April 26

officially released May 22, 2001

Per Curiam.

The appeal is dismissed.
<PAGE>


                                  POWER OF ATTORNEY
                                  -----------------

    KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of the undersigned, being a
director or officer, or both, of each of RJR NABISCO HOLDINGS CORP. and RJR
NABISCO, INC., each a Delaware corporation (the "Companies"), do hereby make,
constitute and appoint Robert F. Sharpe, Jr., H. Colin McBride, David F.
Sternlieb and Sara L. Silbiger, and each of them, attorneys-in-fact and agents
of the undersigned with full power and authority of substitution and
resubstitution, in any and all capacities, to execute for and on behalf of the
undersigned the ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K of RJR Nabisco Holdings Corp. and RJR
Nabisco, Inc., for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996, and any and all
amendments or supplements to the foregoing Annual Report and any other documents
and instruments incidental thereto, and to deliver and file the same, with all
exhibits thereto, and all documents and instruments in connection therewith,
with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and with each exchange on which any
class of securities of the Companies is registered, granting unto said
attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do
and perform each and every act and thing that said attorneys-in-fact and agents,
and each of them, deem advisable or necessary to enable the Companies to
effectuate the intents and purposes hereof, and the undersigned hereby fully
ratify and confirm all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them,
or their or his or her substitute or substitutes, shall do or cause to be done
by virtue hereof.


    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has subscribed his or her name,
this 28th day of February, 1997.


/s/ Steven F. Goldstone                Chairman of the Board, President,
------------------------------         Chief Executive Officer and Director
Steven F. Goldstone 

/s/ Robert S. Roath                    Senior Vice President and Chief
------------------------------         Financial Officer
Robert S. Roath              

/s/ Richard G. Russell                 Senior Vice President and Controller
------------------------------
Richard G. Russell


<PAGE>

                                        Page 2


/s/ John T. Chain, Jr.                 Director
------------------------------
John T. Chain, Jr.

/s/ Julius L. Chambers                 Director
------------------------------
Julius L. Chambers

/s/ John L. Clendenin                  Director
------------------------------
John L. Clendenin

/s/ Ray J. Groves                      Director
------------------------------
Ray J. Groves

/s/ L. Dennis Kozlowski                Director
------------------------------
L. Dennis Kozlowski

/s/ H. Eugene Lockhart                 Director
------------------------------
H. Eugene Lockhart

/s/ John G. Medlin, Jr.                Director
------------------------------
John G. Medlin, Jr.

/s/ Rozanne L. Ridgway                 Director
------------------------------
Rozanne L. Ridgway
#### Anthony J. CILWA, petitioner, v. John K. FORT.

No. 17-6091.

Jan. 16, 2018.

Former decision, 138 S.Ct. 430.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Exhibit 32.2

| (1)   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  DATE: November 10, 2010 |  /s/ David A. Garrison                         |
|-------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|                          | David A. Garrison                                   |
|                          | Executive Vice President andChief Financial Officer |

----
#### Board of Butler County Comm’rs v. Alvarez

111,252

01/27/2016

Denied.

Unpublished
No. 11-11141.

#### Gay *v.*Illinois.

App. Ct. Ill., 4th Dist. Cer-tiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 61 (Monday, March 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15193-15194]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-8024]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Klamath River Basin Fisheries Task Force; Meeting

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (5 U.S.C. App. 1), this notice announces a meeting of the Klamath 
River Basin Fisheries Task Force, established under the authority of 
the Klamath River Fishery Resources Restoration Act (16

[[Page 15194]]

U.S.C. 460ss et seq.). The meeting is open to the public.

DATES: The Klamath River Basin Fisheries Task Force will meet from 8 
a.m. to 4:30 p.m. on Wednesday, April 23, 1997 and from 8 a.m. to 4:30 
p.m. on Thursday, April 24, 1997.

PLACE: The meeting will be held at the Red Lion Inn, 1929 Fourth 
Street, Eureka, California 95501.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Ronald A. Iverson, Project Leader, 
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, P.O. Box 1006, (1030 South Main), 
Yreka, California 96097-1006, telephone (916) 842-5763.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The principal agenda items at this meeting 
will be: The Klamath River Basin Fisheries Task Force will identify 
problems and issues associated with a flow study for the Klamath River 
Basin, decide on policy questions, and clarify flow study objectives.
    For background information on the Task Force, please refer to the 
notice of their initial meeting that appeared in the Federal Register 
on July 8, 1987 (52 FR 25639).

    Dated: March 25, 1997.
Thomas J. Dwyer,
Acting Regional Director.
[FR Doc. 97-8024 Filed 3-28-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Sharon E. Birkett, Vice President Finance and Chief Financial and Accounting Officer of Multi-Color Corporation (the Company), certify
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 9, 2010



By:

/s/ Sharon E. BirkettSharon E. BirkettVice President, Chief Financial
and Accounting Officer, Secretary
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 9/30/98
RALSTON PURINA COMPANY BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF EARNINGS AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          89,800
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  741,700
<ALLOWANCES>                                    24,500
<INVENTORY>                                    600,400
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,527,500
<PP&E>                                       2,212,900
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,096,900
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,551,700
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,582,000
<BONDS>                                      1,794,800
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          256,100
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        32,600
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,056,500
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,551,700
<SALES>                                      4,653,300
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,653,300
<CGS>                                        2,299,700
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,299,700
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,689,200
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,900
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             191,100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                469,400
<INCOME-TAX>                                   117,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            390,600
<DISCONTINUED>                                 715,100
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,105,700
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.59<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.38<F1>
<FN>
<F1>REFLECTS EFFECT OF 3-FOR-1 STOCK SPLIT DECLARED MAY 28, 1998.  FINANCIAL 
DATA SCHEDULES FOR PERIODS ENDED PRIOR TO 6-30-98 HAVE NOT BEEN RESTATED FOR 
THIS STOCK SPLIT.

</FN>

        


</TABLE>
No. 12-5369.

#### Huck *v.*Norman, Warden.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Hennion & Walsh, Inc. S-6/A


Exhibit 4.3


 



 


Consent of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm


We have issued our report
dated July 15, 2021, with respect to the financial statement of SmartTrust 525 contained in Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement
on Form S-6 (File No. 333-255335) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in the Registration Statement
and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm”.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


July 15, 2021
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADDED BY
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Provident Bankshares
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Dennis A.
Starliper, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
             15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
             material respects, the financial condition and results of
             operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the
             Report.


                                              /s/    Dennis A. Starliper
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Dennis A. Starliper
                                              Chief Financial Officer

August 9, 2004
# C_2022418EN.01005401.xml

| 31.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 418/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 418/54

---

Action brought on 20 September 2022 — Trus v EUIPO — Unilab (ARTRESAN)

(Case T-585/22)

(2022/C 418/69)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Mariusz Trus (Lublin, Poland) (represented by: W. Włodarczyk, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Unilab LP (Rockville, Maryland, United States)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark ARTRESAN — European Union trade mark No 4 304 937

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 July 2022 in joined Cases R 1428/2020-1 and R 1481/2020-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision to the extent that the trade mark at issue was maintained for the goods in Class 5 ‘therapeutic creams for joints; food supplements for medical purposes’; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision to the extent that the trade mark at issue was maintained for the goods in Class 5 ‘therapeutic creams for joints; food supplements for medical purposes’;

| — | declare the mark revoked also for the above mentioned goods in Class 5; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare the mark revoked also for the above mentioned goods in Class 5;

| — | order EUIPO and the intervener to pay the costs incurred in the present proceedings and in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and the intervener to pay the costs incurred in the present proceedings and in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of the first sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of the first sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---