alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21
- 6568

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. DAVID ALEXANDER CULVER , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Statesville

. Kenneth D. Bell, District Judge. ( 5:19

- cr - 00013

- KDB

- DCK

- 1 )

Submitted : August 30, 2021 Decided: September 14, 2021

Before NIEMEYER and THACKER , Circuit Judges , and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge

.
Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
David Alexander Culver , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: David Alexander Culver appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i), as amended by the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115

- 391, § 603(b)(1), 132 Stat. 5194, 5239. Upon review, we discern no abuse of discretion in the district court’s determination that Culver di d not establish extraordinary and compelling reasons justifying early release

. See United States v. Kibble , 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir. 2021) (providing standard of review and outlining steps for evaluating compassionate release motions)

. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not a id the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
H. Res. 143 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

February 25, 2019. 

Resolved, That Cheryl L. Johnson of the State of 

Louisiana, be, and is hereby, chosen Clerk of the House of 

Representatives, effective February 26, 2019. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7121

WILLIE LEE STEVENS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DIRECTOR OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Chief District Judge. (CA-96-1327-A)

Submitted: October 23, 1997 Decided: November 17, 1997

Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Willie Lee Stevens, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel John Munroe, OFFICE OF

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.

1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Stevens v. Director, Dep't Corr., No. CA-96-1327-A

(E.D. Va. July 8, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
| Home > Households, Buildings & Industry >Transportation Surveys > Household Vehicles Energy Use > Figure ES5 |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                              |
# Data for Table B26

# RSEs for Table B26
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 15

- 00070

- CV

SKYLINE EMS INC. and Juan “Johnny” Cordero,

Appellants

v.

AR CONCEPTS INC.

, Appellee

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014

- CI

- 15618

The Honorable Richard E. Price, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI

, JUSTICE CHAPA , AND JUSTICE PULLIAM

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is

AFFIRMED. Costs of appeal are taxed against Appellants S kyline EMS Inc. and Juan “Johnny”

Cordero.

SIGNED November 25, 2015.

_____________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice
# hmhexslw.0909a
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JU LY 6, 2016

NO. 03

- 16

- 00056

- CV

Michael Cardiel, Appellant

v.

Carrillo Family Trust, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JU STICES PEMBERTON AND BOURLAND

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the tr i a l court on December 29, 2015. Having

reviewed the record

, it appears to the Court that appellant has not prosecuted his appeal and did

not file a brief, nor comply with a notice from the Clerk of this Court. Therefore, the Court

dismisses the appeal for want of prosecution. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay

costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 51 (Monday, March 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12624-12625]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6588]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Office of Fossil Energy
[Docket No. FE C&E 97-01--Certification Notice--154]


Pasadena Cogeneration; Notice of Filing of Coal Capability 
Powerplant and Industrial Fuel Use Act

AGENCY: Office of Fossil Energy, Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of filing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On February 28, 1997, Pasadena Cogeneration L.P. submitted a 
coal capability self-certification pursuant to section 201 of the 
Powerplant and Industrial Fuel Use Act of 1978, as amended.

ADDRESSES: Copies of self-certification filings are available for 
public inspection, upon request, in the Office of Fuels Programs, 
Fossil Energy, Room

[[Page 12625]]

3F-056, FE-52, Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W., 
Washington, D.C. 20585.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ellen Russell at (202) 586-9624.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title II of the Powerplant and 
Industrial Fuel Use Act of 1978 (FUA), as amended (42 U.S.C. 8301 
et seq.), provides that no new baseload electric powerplant may be 
constructed or operated without the capability to use coal or 
another alternate fuel as a primary energy source. In order to meet 
the requirement of coal capability, the owner or operator of such 
facilities proposing to use natural gas or petroleum as its primary 
energy source shall certify, pursuant to FUA section 201(d), to the 
Secretary of Energy prior to construction, or prior to operation as 
a base load powerplant, that such powerplant has the capability to 
use coal or another alternate fuel. Such certification establishes 
compliance with section 201(a) as of the date filed with the 
Department of Energy. The Secretary is required to publish a notice 
in the Federal Register that a certification has been filed. The 
following owner/operator of the proposed new baseload powerplant 
has filed a self-certification in acccordance with section 201(d).

    Owner: Pasadena Cogeneration L.P.
    Operator: Pasadena Cogeneration L.P.
    Location: Harris County, Texas.
    Plant Configuration: Combined cycle, topping-cycle cogeneration.
    Capacity: 240 megawatts.
    Fuel: Natural gas.
    Purchasing Entities: Philips Petroleum Co. and Houston Lighting & 
Power Co.
    In-Service Date: October 31, 1998.

    Issued in Washington, D.C., March 11, 1997.
Anthony J. Como,
Director, Electric Power Regulation, Office of Coal & Power Im/Ex, 
Office of Coal & Power systems, Office of Fossil Energy.
[FR Doc. 97-6588 Filed 3-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
Rev 0 (9/08) 

## Com **ments i**  **n Response to “**  **Final r**  **ule; r**  **equest for c**  **om ments**  **”**
**Docket: FAA**  **- 20**  **13 -**  **0393 Directorate Identifier**  **2012 -**  **CE -**  **025 -**  **AD** Comments have been received in response to : **“ Final rule; requ**  **est for comments,”** Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket and Directorate I dentifier entered above. (Project engineer: Please review any comments to determine if additional action is warranted. Once you have made your determination, please fill in the com menter(s) name(s) and check the appropriate response below. Include additional information following the appropriate response, if necessary. Then **include your name and**  **the date**  in the spaces provided, and return it to the AD directorate focal. The FAA has reviewed comment(s) related to the above FAA Docket that we re ceived from: Wermlandsflyg Operations AB , Robert A. L ouviaux , Larry Bantle , William Smith , Ruben Correa , Aero Air LLC , Air Spray Ltd , Michael Grabbe A number of commenters made good points, but most can be resolved with AMOCs to prevent their fleet from being grounded. We realize the timeline is stringent, and is more stingent than Twin Commander originally proposed. However, we do have technical data to support a very short compliance time. We do agree, though, that the compliance time requirements should have included flight hours and flight cycles, not just calendar time. We are addressing this through AMOCs instead of superseding the AD. **(Please check on**  **e**

**)** These comments **have not** been found to contain any information to warrant reconsideration or change of this AD. These comments **have** been found to contain information that warrants consideration of additional regulatory

action. 

### (S **EE Airworthiness Directives Manual FAA**  **- IR**  **- M**  **- 8040.1 FOR ADDITIONAL ACTION.)** 

______Kathleen Arrigotti

_____ 7 Aug. 2013

__ Name: Date:

(This form is part of the official docket file for this AD action.)
Jfourtj) Court of

£§>an gntonio,

April 08,2013

No. 04-12-00735-CR and 04-12-00736-CR

Albert NICHOLAS,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 198th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. B93-6 and B93-7

Honorable Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant's Second (Further) Motion for Rehearing is DENIED. In an appeal, this court

can only consider the record that was before the trial court in ruling on appellant's motion for

DNA testing. See Leza v. State, 351 S.W.3d 344, 362 n.78 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011) ("Perhaps the

most basic characteristic of the appellate record is that it is limited to matters before the trial

court."); Roughley v. State,No. 05-03-00049-CR, 2003 WL22450442, at *1 (Tex. App—Dallas

Oct. 29, 2003, pet. ref d) (holding trial court is not required "to review convicted person's

entire trial record in ruling on motion for post-conviction DNA testing").

Ca

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 41 (Monday, March 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9446-9447]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5133]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service


Jimmy Carter National Historic Site; Notice of Advisory 
Commission Meeting

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given in accordance with the Federal Advisory

[[Page 9447]]

Commission Act that a meeting of the Jimmy Carter National Historic 
Site Advisory Commission will be held at 8:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. at the 
following location and date.

DATES: March 20-21, 1997.

LOCATION: The Carter Presidential Library, One Coppenhill, Atlanta, 
Georgia 30303.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. Fred Boyles, Superintendent, Jimmy Carter National Historic Site, 
Route 1 Box 800, Andersonville, Georgia 31711, (912) 924-0343.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of the Jimmy Carter National 
Historic Site Advisory Commission is to advise the Secretary of the 
Interior or his designee on achieving balanced and accurate 
interpretation of the Jimmy Carter National Historic Site.
    The members of the Advisory Commission are as follows:

Dr. Steven Hochman
Dr. James Sterling Young
Dr. Donald B. Schewe
Dr. Henry King Stanford
Dr. Barbara Fields, Director, National Park Service, Ex-Officio member

    The matters to be discussed at this meeting include the status of 
park development and planning activities. This meeting will be open to 
the public. However, facilities and space for accommodating members of 
the public are limited. Any member of the public may file with the 
commission a written statement concerning the matters to be discussed. 
Written statements may also be submitted to the Superintendent at the 
address above. Minutes of the meeting will be available at Park 
Headquarters for public inspection approximately 4 weeks after the 
meeting.

    Dated: February 24, 1997.
Daniel W. Brown,
Acting Regional Director, Southeast Region.
[FR Doc. 97-5133 Filed 2-28-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-M
No. 11-10900.

#### Larson *v.*California.

Sup. Ct. Cal. Certio-rari denied.
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law

of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation

of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms

and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

** Honorable Nathaniel R. Jones, Senior Circuit Judge, United States Court of Appeals

for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

Filed 5/22/96

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

SHARON STEPHENS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

MARVIN T. RUNYON, Postmaster

General,

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 95-6154

(D.C. No. CIV-94-765-T)

(W.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before PORFILIO, JONES,** and TACHA, Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously to grant the parties’ request for a decision on the briefs without oral argument.
2

See Fed. R. App. P. 34(f) and 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted

without oral argument. 

Plaintiff Sharon Stephens is a Postal Service employee. Based on the conduct of

another Postal Service employee, Vic Clark, plaintiff asserted claims against defendant

Postmaster General for sexual discrimination based on hostile work environment, and for age

discrimination. The district court granted defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment

on plaintiff’s sexual discrimination claim on February 24, 1995, and later dismissed

plaintiff’s age discrimination claim. Plaintiff appeals from the district court’s grant of partial

summary judgment in favor of defendant on her sexual discrimination claim. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

The district court held that plaintiff’s only timely Equal Employment Opportunity

complaint related to an incident with Clark on January 5, 1993, but that plaintiff did not

allege sexual harassment in that encounter. The district court also held that previous

incidents of alleged sexual harassment by Clark were too infrequent and distant in time to

form a continuing pattern of sexual discrimination. The district court therefore concluded

that plaintiff’s claim of sexual discrimination based on hostile work environment could not

survive summary judgment.

Plaintiff argues on appeal that the district court erred by holding: (1) that she could

not prevail as a matter of law on her claim of sexual harassment based on hostile work
3

environment, and (2) that her claim of prior sexual harassment was not timely under the

continuing violation doctrine.

The district court carefully and thoroughly analyzed the issues in light of the record.

We have also carefully reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal. We affirm for

substantially the same reasons as those set forth in the district court’s February 24, 1995

order.

The judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of

Oklahoma is AFFIRMED.

Entered for the Court

Deanell Reece Tacha 

Circuit Judge
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 144 

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Women’s Health Week. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 12, 2009 

Mr. FEINGOLD (for himself, Ms. SNOWE, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, Mr. KERRY, Mr. 

DODD, Mr. SANDERS, Ms. STABENOW, and Mr. BEGICH) submitted the 

following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Women’s Health 

Week. 

Whereas women of all backgrounds should be encouraged to 

greatly reduce the risk of common diseases through preventive measures such as a healthy lifestyle that includes 

engaging in regular physical activity, eating a nutritious 

diet, and visiting a healthcare provider to receive regular 

check-ups and preventative screenings; 

Whereas significant disparities exist in the prevalence of disease among women of different backgrounds, including 

women with disabilities, African-American women, AsianPacific Islander women, Latinas, American-Indian 

women, and Alaska Native women; 

Whereas healthy habits should begin at a young age; 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 144 ATS 

Whereas it is important to educate women and girls about 

the significance of awareness of key female health issues; 

Whereas the Offices on Women’s Health within the Department of Health and Human Services, the Food and Drug 

Administration, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Health Resources and Services Administration, the National Institutes of Health, and the Agency 

for Healthcare Research and Quality are vital to providing critical services in supporting women’s health research, education, and other necessary services that benefit women of any age, race, or ethnicity; 

Whereas National Women’s Health Week begins on Mother’s 

Day annually and celebrates the efforts of national and 

community organizations working with partners and volunteers to improve awareness of key women’s health 

issues; 

Whereas May 11, 2009, is National Women’s Check-Up Day; 

and 

Whereas in 2009, the week of May 10 through May 16 is 

dedicated as National Women’s Health Week: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes the importance of preventing dis3 eases that commonly affect women; 

4 (2) supports the goals and ideals of National 

5 Women’s Health Week; 

6 (3) calls on the people of the United States to 

7 use National Women’s Health Week, which begins 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
3 

•SRES 144 ATS 

1 on May 10, 2009, as an opportunity to learn about 

2 health issues that face women; 

3 (4) calls on the women of the United States to 

4 observe National Women’s Check-Up Day by receiv5 ing preventive screenings from their health care pro6 viders; and 

7 (5) recognizes the importance of federally-fund8 ed programs that provide research and collect data 

9 on common diseases in women. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
# File Information

A7 - VMT by Income

Std Errors for A7

N Cells for A7

# A7 - VMT by Income

# Std Errors for A7

# N Cells for A7
<PAGE>   1

                                  EXHIBIT (21)


                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                          STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF
NAME                                                       INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                                    <C>
Dataforms, Inc.                                                             Wisconsin

Duplex Products Inc.                                                         Delaware

Formcraft, Inc.                                                                 Texas

Reyna Financial Corporation                                                      Ohio

        Reyna Leasing Corporation *                                          New York

Reynolds and Reynolds (Canada) Limited                                         Canada

Reynolds Vehicle Registration, Inc.                                              Ohio

Salcris Corporation                                                           Alabama


<FN>

* Wholly-owned subsidiary of Reyna Financial Corporation

</TABLE>


                                       63
# X1 - Num of HH with Veh
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Jill M. Broadfoot, the Chief Financial Officer of Vical Incorporated (the Company),
hereby certifies that, to the best of her knowledge:



| | 1. | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the
Periodic Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by
the Periodic Report and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Periodic Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|Dated: November 9, 2010
|                       
|/s/ JILL M. BROADFOOT  
|Jill M. Broadfoot      
|Chief Financial Officer

THIS CERTIFICATION
ACCOMPANIES THE FORM 10-Q TO WHICH IT RELATES, IS NOT DEEMED FILED WITH THE SEC AND IS NOT TO BE INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO ANY FILING OF THE COMPANY UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, OR THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934, AS AMENDED (WHETHER MADE BEFORE OR AFTER THE DATE OF THE FORM 10-Q), IRRESPECTIVE OF ANY GENERAL INCORPORATION LANGUAGE CONTAINED IN SUCH FILING. A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS CERTIFICATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE COMPANY AND WILL BE
RETAINED BY THE COMPANY AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
# 23q3_origin