alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2022222EN.01003701.xml

| 7.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 222/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 222/37

---

Action brought on 13 April 2022 — TA Towers v EUIPO — Wobben Properties (Building materials)

(Case T-201/22)

(2022/C 222/60)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: TA Towers ApS (Odense, Denmark) (represented by: L. Andersen, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Wobben Properties GmbH (Aurich, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the design at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Design at issue: Community design No 6 352 332-0002 (Building materials)

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 February 2022 in Case R 2491/2020-3

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | annul the decision of the Cancellation Division of 20 November 2020 in Case ICD 108 310; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Cancellation Division of 20 November 2020 in Case ICD 108 310;

| — | order EUIPO and the invalidity applicant to pay the costs of the proceedings before the Cancellation Division, the Board of Appeal and the General Court. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and the invalidity applicant to pay the costs of the proceedings before the Cancellation Division, the Board of Appeal and the General Court.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002;

| — | Infringement of Article 8 of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8 of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002;

| — | Infringement of Article 62 of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 62 of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-29-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-28-1997
<CASH>                                          23,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,432,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  5,926,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,758,000
<PP&E>                                      36,176,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              15,143,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              33,468,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,152,000
<BONDS>                                     12,600,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        9,393,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,948,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,381,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                33,468,000
<SALES>                                     23,276,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            23,276,000
<CGS>                                       19,503,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               22,610,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (79,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             553,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                192,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   192,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
Diluted effect less than 3%.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 55 (Friday, March 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 13614]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-7310]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Wednesday, March 26, 1997.

PLACE: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, C Street 
entrance between 20th and 21st Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20551.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

    1. Proposals regarding a Federal Reserve Bank's building 
requirements.
    2. Federal Reserve System compensation policy matters.
    3. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve 
System employees.
    4. Any items carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Mr. Joseph R. Coyne, Assistant to 
the Board; (202) 452-3204. You may call (202) 452-3207, beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before this meeting, for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting.

    Dated: March 19, 1997.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-7310 Filed 3-19-97; 10:59 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
BEFORE THE

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

WASHINGTON, D.C.

_________________________________________

)

Application of )

)

CARIBBEAN SUN AIRLINES, INC. D/B/A )

WORLD ATLANTIC AIRLINES ) DOCKET OST-2014-0152

)

for a Certificate of Public Convenience )

and Necessity (Interstate Passenger )

Charter Service) )

_________________________________________ )

MOTION OF CARIBBEAN SUN AIRLINES, INC. D/B/A

WORLD ATLANTIC AIRLINES FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT

Communications with respect to this document should be sent to:

John R. Mietus, Jr.

Law Office of John Mietus, LLC

6701 Democracy Blvd., Suite 300

Bethesda, MD 20817-7500

(202) 747-5212

john@mietuslaw.com

Counsel for CARIBBEAN SUN

AIRLINES, INC. d/b/a WORLD 

ATLANTIC AIRLINES

September 12, 2014
BEFORE THE

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

WASHINGTON, D.C.

_________________________________________

)

Application of )

)

CARIBBEAN SUN AIRLINES, INC. D/B/A )

WORLD ATLANTIC AIRLINES ) DOCKET OST-2014-0152

) September 12, 2014

for a Certificate of Public Convenience )

and Necessity (Interstate Passenger )

Charter Service) )

_________________________________________ )

MOTION OF CARIBBEAN SUN AIRLINES, INC. D/B/A

WORLD ATLANTIC AIRLINES FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT

Pursuant to Rule 12 of the Department's Rules of Practice, 14 C.F.R. 

§ 302.12, Caribbean Sun Airlines, Inc. d/b/a World Atlantic Airlines 

respectfully moves to withhold from public disclosure the contents of 

Confidential Exhibit B. World Atlantic previously submitted the documents 

in that exhibit to the Department on an informal, confidential basis, and the 

Department asked that they be submitted in the above-captioned application. 

They are marked “Confidential” and are being filed under seal

simultaneously with this application.
World Atlantic

Motion

Page 2

Confidential Exhibit B contains confidential funding commitments, 

from a financial institution and from trade creditors, that contain sensitive 

business information. Release of that information could harm World 

Atlantic’s competitive position.

The Department routinely treats such information confidentially when 

produced, as was the case here, in an informal context while reviewing a 

carrier’s continuing fitness. As the requested authority would not constitute 

a substantial change in its operations, World Atlantic submits that there is 

no reason to treat the information differently in this docket. See Application 

at 2-3 & nn. 2-3. World Atlantic further submits that the information sought 

to be withheld from public disclosure meets Department precedent for 

nondisclosure and the standards found in exemption (4) of the Freedom of 

Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(4), in that it is: (1) commercial or financial, 

(2) obtained from a person outside the government, and (3) privileged or 

confidential. See Gulf & Western Indus., Inc. v. United States, 615 F.2d 527, 

529 (D.C. Cir. 1979); National Parks and Conservation Assoc. v. Morton, 498 

F.2d 765, 770 (D.C. Cir. 1974).
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hamilton Nolberto Contreras LOPEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-13388 Non-Argument Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

(February 21, 2018)

*989Yvette Rhodes, U.S. Attorney Service— Middle District of Florida, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Hamilton Nolberto Contreras Lopez, Pro Se

Before WILSON, JORDAN and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Darlene Calzón Barror, appointed counsel for Hamilton Nolberto Contreras Lopez in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Contreras Lopez’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-40289

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MIKEAEL LAKIEATH BOWEN,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:16-CR-118-1

Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Mikeael Lakieath Bowen has moved 

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Bowen has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief 

and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with 

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 12, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 18-40289 Document: 00514757459 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/12/2018
No. 18-40289

2

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 18-40289 Document: 00514757459 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/12/2018
Dismissed and Opinion Filed December 30, 2014 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00860-CV 

INOCENCIO COSTILLA, Appellant 

V. 

MARY LOU GARZA COSTILLA, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District Court 

Collin County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 429-53955-2012 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Francis, Evans, and Stoddart 

Opinion by Justice Francis 

In a letter dated September 24, 2014, the Court questioned its jurisdiction over this 

appeal; specifically, that the notice of appeal was untimely. But because the notice of appeal was 

filed within the fifteen-day grace period, we instructed appellant to file an extension motion by 

October 6, 2014. . See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. We cautioned appellant that failure to file an 

extension motion within the time specified would result in dismissal of the appeal without further 

notice. As of today’s date, appellant has not filed an extension motion. 

The trial court signed the judgment on April 1, 2014. Appellant filed both a timely 

request for findings of fact and conclusions of law and a timely motion for new trial. 

Accordingly, the notice of appeal was due on June 30, 2014, ninety days after the date the 

judgment was signed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a)(1). An extension of time may be granted if an 
 –2– 

appellant files a notice of appeal within fifteen days of the deadline and an extension motion. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. Without a timely filed notice of appeal, this Court lacks jurisdiction. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.1(b). 

Appellant filed his notice of appeal on Tuesday, July 1, 2014, one day late. Because 

appellant did not timely file his notice of appeal or obtain an extension of time to file his notice 

of appeal, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a). 

140860F.P05 

 

/Molly Francis/ 

MOLLY FRANCIS 

JUSTICE 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

INOCENCIO COSTILLA, Appellant 

No. 05-14-00860-CV V. 

MARY LOU GARZA COSTILLA, 

Appellee 

 On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District 

Court, Collin County, Texas. 

Trial Court Cause No. 429-53955-2012. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Francis. 

Justices Evans and Stoddart, participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED. 

 It is ORDERED that appellee MARY LOU GARZA COSTILLA recover her costs of 

this appeal from appellant INOCENCIO COSTILLA. 

Judgment entered December 30, 2014.
EXHIBIT 99.2





MEDSTONE INTERNATIONAL, INC.





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of the Medstone International, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark Selawski, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:





| | (1) |  | Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




/s/    MARK SELAWSKIMark Selawski Chief Financial
Officer





August 13, 2002
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.3

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Resource America, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K/A for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Edward
E. Cohen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15
       (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
       Company.



                                                 /s/ Edward E. Cohen
                                                 ---------------------------
                                                 Edward E. Cohen
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                                 October 31, 2003



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Resource America, Inc. and will be retained by Resource America,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
# mecs07
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 54 (Thursday, March 20, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 13386]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6998]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

Ocean Freight Forwarder License; Applicants

    Notice is hereby given that the following applicants have filed 
with the Federal Maritime Commission applications for licenses as ocean 
freight forwarders pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 
(46 U.S.C. app. 1718 and 46 CFR 510).
    Persons knowing of any reason why any of the following applicants 
should not receive a license are requested to contact the Office of 
Freight Forwarders, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573.

Bottom Line Forwarders, Corp., 10302 N.W. South River Dr., Bay #19, 
Medley, FL 33178, Officers: Waldy Castro, President, Tensie Barry, 
Corporate Secretary
Inter World Customs Broker, Inc., Marketing Bldg. (Lobby), J.F. Kennedy 
Ave. Km 2.5, Puerto Nuevo, PR 00922, Officer: Lawrence Colon Castro, 
President

    Dated: March 17, 1997.
Joseph C. Polking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-6998 Filed 3-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
Exhibit No. 11
                      HARDING LAWSON ASSOCIATES GROUP, INC.

                        Computation of Per Share Earnings
                      (In thousands, except per share data)
                                   (Unaudited)


                                                 Three Months Ended August 31,
                                                 1996                    1995
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PRIMARY
     Average shares outstanding                  4,892                   4,761
     Net effect of dilutive stock options
         based on the modified treasury stock
         method using the average market price      28                      43
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

         TOTAL                                   4,920                   4,804
================================================================================

     Net income                                 $  226                 $   935
================================================================================

     Net income per share                       $ 0.05                 $  0.19
================================================================================
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-70,960-02

EX P ARTE GREG ORY SCOTT NARRAMORE, Applicant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 13616-B IN THE 115T H DISTRICT COURT

F ROM UP SHUR COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Pursuant to the provisi o n s o f Ar t icle 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of murder and sentenc ed to eighty year s’ imprisonment. T h e Six th Court of Appea ls aff irmed his conviction. Narramore v. State , No. 06-05-00226- CR (Te x . App.—Texarkana Mar. 20, 2007) (not designated for publication). Applicant contends that he is ac tu al l y innocent and his due proce ss rights wer e violated beca use the State prese nted false evidenc e. Applicant has alleg ed fac ts that, if true, might entitle him to relief

. Ex parte Patterson , 993 S.W .2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these circ umstances,2

additional fac ts are neede d. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez , 334 S.W .2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for finding s of fac t. The trial court sha ll hold a live evidentiar

y hearing. Applicant appear s to be represe nted by counsel. I f he is not, the trial court shall deter mine whether he is indige nt. I f Applicant is indige nt and wishes to be repr esente d by co un s el , the trial court shall appoint an attorney to r epre sent him at the hearing. T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 26.04. T h e trial court shall make finding s of fac t and conclusions of law as to wh et h er (1 ) Applicant’s claims meet one of the exceptions in Article 11.07, § 4 of t he Code of Criminal Procedur e; (2) the evidenc e Applicant relies on for his a ctual innocenc e claim is newly discovere d

or available , Ex parte Brown , 205 S.W .3d 538, 545–46 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006); (3) Applicant has established by clea

r and convincing evidenc e that he is actua lly innocent, Ex parte Elizon d o , 9 4 7 S.W .2d 202, 209 (T ex . Crim. App. 1996); and (4) Applicant’s conviction was based on false and materia l testimony

. Ex parte W einstein , 421 S.W .3d 656, 665 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). The trial court shall also make any other finding s of fac t and conclusions of law that it d eems rele vant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s cla ims for habe as cor pus relief

. This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fac t issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 day s of this order

. A supplem en t al transcript containing all aff idavits and int err og atories or the transc ription of the court repor ter’s notes from any hearing or deposition, alongwith the trial court’ s supplemental finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law, shall be forwa rded to this Court within 120 day s of the date of this order

. Any extensions of time must be reque sted by

the trial cour

t and shall be obtaine d from this Court.3

Filed: Mar ch 21, 2018 Do not publish
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1139 

Honoring the 50th Anniversary of the National Park Service VolunteersIn-Parks program that was established on July 29, 1970. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 22, 2020 

Mr. KIND (for himself and Mr. HURD of Texas) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the 50th Anniversary of the National Park Service 

Volunteers-In-Parks program that was established on 

July 29, 1970. 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives honors 

2 the 50th Anniversary of the National Park Service Volun3 teers-In-Parks program that was established on July 29, 

4 1970. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS