alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 October 3, 2017

p0925

Order 

Clerk

October 3, 2017

154412 & (20)(24)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 154412

COA: 332983

Barry CC: 14-000185-FH

BRADLEY JAMES BEARD, Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motions for miscellaneous relief are DENIED. The 

application for leave to appeal the August 29, 2016 order of the Court of Appeals is 

considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of 

establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
#### GEORGE HAWKINS *v.*COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

(AC 34927)

Lavine, Kobinson and Borden, Js.

Argued October 15

officially released November 5, 2013

Per Curiam.

The appeal is dismissed.
# C_2022463EN.01005801.xml

| 5.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 463/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 463/58

---

Action brought on 15 October 2022 — C. & S. v EUIPO — Scuderia AlphaTauri (CS jeans your best fashion partner)

(Case T-645/22)

(2022/C 463/85)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: C. & S. Srl (Umbertide, Italy) (represented by: E. Montelione, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Scuderia AlphaTauri SpA (Faenza, Italy)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark CS jeans your best fashion partner — European Union trade mark No 9 387 986

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 August 2022 in Case R 182/2022-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Knickerbocker Capital Corp. for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, I certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:  (1)the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Knickerbocker Capital Corp. for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Knickerbocker Capital Corp..    By:/s/ Dempsey MorkName:Dempsey MorkTitle:Principal Executive Officer,
and DirectorDate:Nov. 19, 2009By:/s/ Dempsey MorkName:Dempsey MorkTitle:Principal Financial OfficerDate:Nov. 19, 2009
No. 11-10876.

#### Bolton *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Resource America, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jonathan Z. Cohen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


                                       /s/ Jonathan Z. Cohen
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Jonathan Z. Cohen
                                       Chief Executive Officer
                                       March 27, 2006
No. 11-10998.

#### Naranjo *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# C_2022237EN.01006101.xml

| 20.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 237/61 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 237/61

---

Action brought on 19 April 2022 — Makhlouf v Council

(Case T-208/22)

(2022/C 237/79)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Kinda Makhlouf (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: G. Karouni and K. Assogba, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should

| — | annul, in so far as those acts concern the applicant,






  — | Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2022/242 of 21 February 2022 implementing Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria and its Annex I; |
| --- | --- | --- |

—

annul, in so far as those acts concern the applicant,

—

Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2022/242 of 21 February 2022 implementing Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria and its Annex I;

| — | Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/237 of 21 February 2022 implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria and its Annex II; |
| --- | --- |

—

Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/237 of 21 February 2022 implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria and its Annex II;

| — | order the Council to pay the sum of EUR 50 000 in damages to compensate all forms of loss; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council to pay the sum of EUR 50 000 in damages to compensate all forms of loss;

Under Article 134 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court, the unsuccessful party is ordered to pay the costs. Ms Kinda Makhlouf requests that the Council be ordered to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by her, of which supporting evidence can be shown during proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on five pleas in law which are, essentially, identical or similar to those relied upon in Case T-206/22, Makhlouf v Council.

---
#### COM. v. KIMBRO, T.

326 WDA 2017

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/21/2017

CP-25-CR-0002723-2015 (Erie)

Affirmed — Application to Withdraw as Counsel Granted
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

______

No. 20-1725

______

In re: WASHINGTON MUTUAL, INC., et al., Debtors

ALICE GRIFFIN, Appellant

______

(Del. D.C. No. 1-19-cv-00775)

______

Present: SMITH, Chief Judge, MCKEE, AMBRO, JORDAN, SHWARTZ, KRAUSE, 

RESTREPO, BIBAS, PORTER, MATEY, PHIPPS and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

______

SUR PETITION FOR REHEARING

______

The petition for rehearing filed by appellant, Alice Griffin in the above-entitled 

case having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this Court, it 

is hereby ORDERED that the petition for rehearing by the panel is granted in part. See 

I.O.P. 9.5.1 (petition for rehearing en banc is presumed to request both panel rehearing 

and rehearing en banc). An erroneous citation in footnote 25 of the original opinion is 

corrected in the amended opinion filed concurrently with this order. In all other respects, 

the petition for panel rehearing is denied. The clerk is directed to re-enter the judgment 

with the amended opinion.

The petition for rehearing having been submitted to all the other available circuit 

judges of the circuit in regular active service, and a majority of the judges of the circuit in 

regular service not having voted for rehearing, the petition for rehearing by the Court en 

banc is denied.

BY THE COURT:

s/ D. Michael Fisher

Circuit Judge

Dated: March 23, 2021

Tmm/cc: Alice Griffin

Mark D. Collins, Esq.
Marcos A. Ramos, Esq.

Brian S. Rosen, Esq.

Amanda R. Steele, Esq.

William P. Bowden, Esq.

Lucas C. Townsend, Esq.
,,

'

,j)

, : egulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-FAA-2011-0816

•; 1 -

·-

·. ' Directorate Identifier: 2011-CE-022-AD

flyou make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

(e.g., Inspection,

propeller, appliance)

replacement) ·

Do not-inelude-fmcondition costs here

Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost

(include cost (labor + u.s. for U.S. Fleet

access, testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered

and close-up) our) Products

Replacement 7 $ 595.00 $1,300 $1.895.00 7 $13.265.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 .)·) 0.00 s 0 00

$ O.QQ . $ 0.00 s 0.00

$ 0.(1(f' $ 0.00 ' $ 0.00

$ 0.0\) $ 0.00

$ O.O.G . . 0.00

.$.

's·

0.00

0.00

$ 0.00 $ ().00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ ().00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

"

f) (\(1 •R n nn n nn

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 ."

.

'

. 0.00

s 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ f) 00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $13,265

Costs covered under warranty (ilknown) $

On-Condition Costs:

Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product

(e.g., Inspection, (include access, (@$85/hour)

replacement) testing, and close- ' '

u£) ,_.;_ ,

$ () 00 '

$

·

0.00

. ·,-;, $ 0.00 $ 0.00

s 0.00 $I 0 00

q· 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):
Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"?;

*Explanation:

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedurt;s:

Is the AD significant? -:

*EQ] anation:

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

YES*0 NO

YES*0 NO

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.,

Explanation:

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

YESD NO

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

*Explanation:

YES*0 NO
14910-J3-P]

-..-.,"•..

- /I T

r::e:L~

~"

Iv 'FJ.~

\ '2-0l

~" ,

~-:Zd-Io ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

, 7"",-]-

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products ---. __

C,(~

Airworthiness Directives; Dassault-Aviation Model FALCON 7X Airplanes

(Docket No. FAA-2010-*H**; Direc:torate Identifier 2010-NM~140-ADI

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

R1N 2120-AA64

14eFR Part 39

Federal Aviation Administration

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsafe

condition as: 1r-/3 10

"'.."-0 .••.•. _

11,"1'\- ,C' 0

• •

~~vW\.

/;0 • • • • • • •

Following investigation of an in service, event, it has been determined that in

case a short circuit occurs on a weight-an-wheels (WOW) proximity sensor

wiring, both circuil breakers that supply power lo that wiring will trip, causing

simultaneous de·power of all WOW proximity sensors of that part of the

system. The loss of the corresponding WOW information would lead to

untimely inhibition of warnings that could compromise the pilol capacity to

react to abnormal or failure landing conditions.

information (MeAl) originated by an aviation aulhority of another COWltry to identify

listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness

The proposed AD would.require actions that ~ intended to address the unsafe condili ~ ••_

described in the MeAl. ","u

,

DATF..s: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by [INSERT DATE 45

FAA Form 1360-14.1 (6-89) 0FflClAl AlE copy
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 21
                                                                  ----------

                              PGI INCORPORATED
                              ----------------
                                SUBSIDIARIES
                                ------------

                                      State of              Relationship
                                      ---------             ------------
                                      Incorporation
                                      -------------

Sugarmill Woods, Inc.                 Florida               Wholly owned (1)
Burnt Store Marina, Inc.              Florida               Wholly owned (1)
Punta Gorda Isles Sales, Inc.         Florida               Wholly owned (1)
Burnt Store Utilities, Inc.           Florida               Wholly owned (1)
Gulf Coast Credit Corporation         Florida               Wholly owned (1)

<FN>
---------------------------------------
(1) Included in the Company's consolidated financial statements.
No. 11-11067.

#### Hunt *v.*Cassese et al.

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

ELSA ROQUEZ DE QUEVEDO,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 14-10085

D.C. No. 5:13-cr-00422-LHK

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Lucy H. Koh, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 17, 2015** 

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.

Elsa Roquez de Quevedo appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the 30-month sentence imposed following her guilty-plea conviction for

illegal reentry following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

FILED

FEB 24 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Roquez de Quevedo contends that the district court’s characterization of her

prior drug offenses as involving “sophisticated” conduct was erroneous and

resulted in a substantively unreasonable sentence. The district court did not abuse

its discretion in imposing Roquez de Quevedo’s sentence. See Gall v. United

States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). The record supports the district court’s

characterization of Roquez de Quevedo’s conduct. The below-Guidelines sentence

is substantively reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors

and the totality of the circumstances, including Roquez de Quevedo’s criminal

history and prior deportations. See Gall, 552 U.S. at 51.

AFFIRMED. 

2 14-10085
<PAGE>

                                EXHIBIT 10.9.1



<PAGE>
                          SECURITY AGREEMENT

                                                    December 11, 1996

To:  UNITED PETROLEUM CORPORATION
     4867 North Broadway
     Knoxville, Tennessee 37918

   For new value received, the undersigned ("debtor") here grants to
you, together with your successors and assigns, ("UPC"), a security
interest in the following instruments or negotiable documents: 1,834,407
shares of United Petroleum Corporation common stock together with all
rights related to those instruments or documents (collectively referred
to below as the ("collateral").

   The collateral shall secure the Promissory Note of the debtor to UPC,
in the principal sum of $10,876,660.90, (such obligation referred to
below as "liability"). The debtor agrees (a) to deliver the collateral
to UPC promptly, and in no event later than 7 days from the date of this
agreement; [2] (b) to hold the collateral, pending such delivery, in
trust for UPC, separate and distinct from any other property of the
debtor and free of all liens and claims whatever other than the security
interest of UPC; and (c) to do such acts and things as UPC may from time
to time request to maintain a valid security interest on the part of UPC
in the collateral (free of all other liens and claims) to secure the
payment of the liability.

   In addition to all other rights possessed by it, UPC shall have all
rights with respect to the collateral that are granted to it under any
promissory note evidencing any of the liabilities with respect to any
collateral referred to in any such promissory note. This agreement has
been delivered at [city and state], and shall, unless otherwise required
by law, be construed in accordance with and governed by the provisions
of the Uniform Commercial Code as in effect from time to time in the
State of Tennessee.

                                      STRATEGIC HOLDINGS CORPORATION


                                      By: /s/ Russell Adler, President
                                         --------------------------------
                                           Russell Adler, President

                                         --------------------------------
                                         -------------------, Florida----

                                   1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000819028
<NAME> AMERICAN FILM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          51,578
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               141,922
<PP&E>                                         510,981
<DEPRECIATION>                                 206,866
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 581,864
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          924,680
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       147,402
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   581,864
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  661,297
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,353
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (661,297)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   661,297
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2022084EN.01005102.xml

| 21.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 84/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 84/51

---

Action brought on 7 January 2022 — Wajos v EUIPO (Shape of a bottle)

(Case T-10/22)

(2022/C 84/72)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Wajos GmbH (Dohr, Germany) (represented by: N. Böhmer und J. Schneiders, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: EU tridimensional mark (Shape of a bottle) — Application for registration No 14 886 097

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 October 2021 in Case R 2958/2019-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of the binding authority of a judgment which has become final; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of the binding authority of a judgment which has become final;

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(e) of Regulation (EU) 207/2009 of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(e) of Regulation (EU) 207/2009 of the Council.

---
No. 12-5245.

#### Smart *v.*Wilson, Attorney General of South Carolina, et al.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-11021.

#### Fripp *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-1583

STEVEN PAUL FLEMING, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus HOLY CROSS HOSPITAL, Defendant - Appellee, and CROWNSVILLE HOSPITAL, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-98- 3933-MJG) Submitted: August 19, 1999 Decided: August 25, 1999Before WIDENER and KING, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Steven Paul Fleming, Appellant Pro Se. David Alan Levin, Mary C.Rice, WHARTON, LEVIN, EHRMANTRAUT, KLEIN & NASH, Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellee.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:Steven Paul Fleming appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action for a lack of jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1332 (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Fleming v. Holy Cross Hospital , No. CA-98-3933-MJG (D. Md. Apr. 8, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of

TIMOTHY ROBERT HOUGH :

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 2 674 Disciplina ry Docket No. 3

Board File No. C1

- 16

- 744

Attorney Registration No. 40898

( Philadelphia )

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 22 nd day of November , 2019, upon consideration of the Joint

Petition to Temporarily Suspend an Attorney

, the Joint Petition is granted, and Timothy

Robert Hough is placed on immediate temporary suspension until further definitive action

by this Court. See Pa.R .D.E. 208(f)(1). I t is further ordered that Respondent shall comply

with all the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 21 7.

This Order constitutes an imposition of public discipline pertaining to

confidentiality. See Pa.R.D.E. 402.