alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT (21)


                  SUN INTERNATIONAL NORTH AMERICA, INC.
                     SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
                         AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1998



                                                       Percentage of
                                                        Outstanding
                                     Place of           Stock Held
Name of Subsidiary                 Incorporation       By Registrant

GGRI, Inc.                         Delaware                 100%

New Pier Operating Company, Inc.   New Jersey               100%

Resorts International
 Hotel Financing, Inc.             Delaware                 100%

Resorts International Hotel, Inc.  New Jersey                (1)

Sun Cove Ltd.                      Connecticut              100%

Sun International Development
 Group, Inc.                       New Jersey               100%

Sun International New York, Inc.   New York                 100%

Sun International Resorts, Inc.    Florida                  100%

PIV, Inc.                          Florida                   (2)

_____________________

(1)  100% owned by GGRI, Inc.
(2)  100% owned by Sun International Resorts, Inc.

     The registrant's subsidiaries generally do business in their
respective corporate names or distinctive short forms thereof which are
readily identifiable.  Resorts International Hotel, Inc. uses the name
Resorts Casino Hotel extensively. 

     The names of certain subsidiaries, which considered in the
aggregate did not constitute a "significant subsidiary" as of December
31, 1998 as defined in Rule 1-02(w) of Regulation S-X, have been
omitted.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 52 (Tuesday, March 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 12801]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6707]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
[I.D. 031097C]


Marine Mammals; Permit No. 765 (P70E)

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Issuance of amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that permit no. 765, issued to Dr. 
William A. Watkins, Oceanographer Emeritus, Woods Hole Oceanographic, 
Institution, Woods Hole, MA 02543, to take marine mammals was extended 
until December 31, 1997.

ADDRESSES: The amendment and related documents are available for review 
upon written request or by appointment in the following offices:
    Permits Division, Office of Protected Resources, NMFS, 1315 East-
West Highway, Room 13130 Silver Spring, MD 20910 (301/712-2289); and
    Northeast Region, NMFS, One Blackburn Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930-
2298 (508/281-9250).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The subject amendment has been issued under 
the authority of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972, as amended 
(16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.), the provisions of Sec. 216.29 of the 
Regulations Governing the Taking and Importing of Marine Mammals (50 
CFR part 216), the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (ESA; 16 
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), and the provisions of Sec. 222.25 of the 
regulations governing the taking, importing, and exporting of 
endangered fish and wildlife (50 CFR part 222).
    Issuance of this permit as required by the ESA was based on a 
finding that such permit: (1) Was applied for in good faith; (2) will 
not operate to the disadvantage of the endangered species which is the 
subject of this permit; and (3) is consistent with the purposes and 
policies set forth in section 2 of the ESA.

    March 7, 1997
Ann D. Terbush,
Chief, Permits and Documentation Division, Office of Protected 
Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 97-6707 Filed 3-17-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
March 24, 2016

Gerardo Rios

Chief, Region 9 Air Permits Office

Air Division AIR-3

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, CA 94105

Subject: Collins Pine Chester PSD Permit Modification

Dear Mr. Rios:

On behalf of Collins Pine, Sierra Research is requesting that the following language be 

inserted into the modified PSD permit:

D. Fuel Usage

Collins Pine shall burn only wood, bark, and wood residues in boiler No. 

4, except during startup, when small amounts (less than 10 gallons per 

event) of California diesel fuel may by burned.

Boiler 4 cogeneration unit burns diesel fuel during startup to maintain flame stabilization. 

No change in any of the permit emission limits, hourly or otherwise, is sought. No 

additional recordkeeping or reporting requirements are required or proposed for PSD 

purposes. 

Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions.

Sincerely,

Steve Hill

cc: Jess Brown, Collins Pine

Joe Fish, NSAQMD

sierra

research

A Trinity Consultants Company

1801 J Street

Sacramento, CA 95811

Tel: (916) 444-6666

Fax: (916) 444-8373

Ann Arbor, MI

Tel: (734) 761-6666

Fax: (734) 761-6755
1

MEMORANDUM

Date: October 20, 2011

Subject: Energy and Environmental Impacts for Mineral Wool Production Industry to 

Comply with Proposed Residual Risk and Technology Review Amendments

Mineral Wool Production RTR

RTI Project No. 0213199.000.010

From: Dave Reeves, RTI International

To: Susan Fairchild

OAQPS/SPPD/NRG (D243-02)

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

The purpose of this memorandum is to present the estimated energy and environmental impacts 

related to the mineral wool production source category for their processes and facilities to comply

with the proposed RTR amendments and associated emission limits.

I. BACKGROUND

Based on the information provided by the mineral wool production industry and their primary

trade association, North American Insulation Manufacturers Association (NAIMA), there are 

currently 7 facilities in the U.S. producing mineral wool. 

II. ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 

We estimate that none of 7 facilities subject to the NESHAP will have to install additional add-on 

control equipment to demonstrate compliance with the new (proposed) emission limits or other 

requirements. Therefore, there are no energy or environmental impacts associated with the 

proposed requirements.
No. 12-5504.

#### Zeleke *v.*Obama, President of the United States, et al.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
U.S. Energy Information Administration | Quarterly Coal Report, January - March 2024

Table 33. Coal carbonized at coke plants by census division

(thousand short tons)

Year to date

Census division January - March

2024

October - December

2023

January - March

2023 2024 2023

Percent

change

Middle Atlantic 1,227 1,226 1,390 1,227 1,390 -11.7

East North Central 2,327 2,420 2,306 2,327 2,306 0.9

South Atlantic 206 211 200 206 200 3.3

East South Central 107 116 130 107 130 -17.2

U.S. Total 3,867 3,974 4,025 3,867 4,025 -3.9

Note: Total may not equal sum of components because of independent rounding.

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), Form EIA-3, 'Quarterly Survey of Industrial, Commercial & Institutional Coal Users.' Prior to third quarter 2014,

coke plant data was collected under Form EIA-5, 'Quarterly Coal Consumption and Quality Report - Coke Plants.'
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5
<MULTIPLIER>                           1000

<S>                                    <C>                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          3-MOS                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      JUN-30-2001           JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                         JUL-01-2000           JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                           SEP-30-2000           SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       6,588                 4,621
<SECURITIES>                                     0                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                               62,551                60,748
<ALLOWANCES>                                (3,544)               (2,012)
<INVENTORY>                                      0                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            67,010                64,289
<PP&E>                                       2,872                 1,661
<DEPRECIATION>                                (963)                 (341)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              69,637                65,996
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       24,241                35,004
<BONDS>                                          0                     0
<COMMON>                                         1                     1
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0                     0
<PREFERRED>                                      0                     0
<OTHER-SE>                                  45,395                30,991
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                69,637                65,996
<SALES>                                          0                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,553                 6,753<F1>
<CGS>                                            0                     0<F1>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,852                 3,892<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,572                 2,039<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               571                   931<F1>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,709                   922
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,701                 2,861
<INCOME-TAX>                                   806                   353
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,895                 2,508
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0                     0
<CHANGES>                                        0                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,895                 2,508
<EPS-BASIC>                                 0.54                  0.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0.46                  0.29

<FN>
<F1>
The company changed the income statement presentation of revenues per adoption
of SAB 101 - see note 1 to the consolidated financial statements.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32(a)


                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. S 1350

           I, Mark E. Schwarz, Chief Executive Officer  of Hallmark Financial
 Services, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby  certify that the accompanying report
 on  Form  10-Q  for the  quarter  ended March 31, 2004,  and filed  with the
 Securities and Exchange Commission  on the date hereof (the "Report"), fully
 complies with the requirements  of Section 13(a)  of the Securities Exchange
 Act of  1934, as amended.  I further certify  that the information contained
 in  the Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material respects,  the financial
 condition and results of operations of the Company.


 Date:     May 14, 2004

                                  /s/ Mark E. Schwarz
                                  ----------------------------------------
                                  Mark E. Schwarz,
                                  Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of AEI Real Estate  Fund
XVII  Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-QSB  for
the  period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on  the  date hereof  (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned, Robert P. Johnson, President of AEI Fund  Management
XVII, Inc., the Managing General Partner of the Partnership,  and
Patrick  W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer of AEI Fund Management
XVII,  Inc., each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Partnership.


                          /s/ Robert P Johnson
                              Robert P. Johnson, President
                              AEI Fund Management XVII, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              August 5, 2005



                          /s/ Patrick W Keene
                              Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer
                              AEI Fund Management XVII, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              August 5, 2005
Kansas
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6751

MICHAEL ANTHONY DAMMONS, Petitioner - Appellant,
versus THOMAS R. CARROLL, Superintendent Johnston Correctional Institute, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (1:05-cv-00642-JAM) Submitted: August 31, 2006 Decided: September 7, 2006 Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bruce Tracy Cunningham, Jr., THE LAW OFFICE OF BRUCE T. CUNNINGHAM, JR., Southern Pines, North Carolina, for Appellant. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Michael Anthony Dammons seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Dammons has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO 

18 U.S.C. §1350, 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

        Inconnection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Arrhythmia Research Technology, Inc.(the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), theundersigned President and Chief Executive Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

Directorate Identifier: 2011
- NM
- 055
- AD **Costs:** Labor per airplane ( 167 work
- hours x $8 5 /hour) $ 14,195 Parts per airplane $ + 13,017 Cost per airplane $ 27,212 Number of U.S.
- registered airplanes x 0 Total fl eet cost $ 0 **Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD hav e a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operate d in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1238 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding prioritizing 

the COVID–19 vaccine for members of the military. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 24, 2020 

Mr. DESJARLAIS submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding prioritizing the COVID–19 vaccine for members of 

the military. 

Whereas there are approximately 1,300,000 active duty 

servicemembers and hundreds of thousands of additional 

trainees; 

Whereas pharmaceutical companies Pfizer, BioNTech, and 

Moderna’s COVID–19 vaccines have shown early signs of 

success and could start to become available to the American people before the end of 2020; 

Whereas it is expected there could be around 40,000,000 

doses of the COVID–19 vaccine available for distribution 

by the end of 2020; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1238 IH 

Whereas it is a priority to distribute the vaccine to those 

most vulnerable such as our Nation’s seniors and other 

high-risk groups starting in December 2020; 

Whereas the United States military and its trainees serve a 

vital role in protecting our Nation and keeping people 

across the world safe; 

Whereas our Nation’s servicemembers and trainees are dealing with low morale due to the COVID–19 pandemic with 

various lockdowns and not being able to train as normal; 

Whereas the United States military has continued to excel 

and perform as the world’s greatest professionals despite 

the challenges of the COVID–19 pandemic; and 

Whereas our Nation’s military is always ready for any challenge to protect the American people and those most vulnerable: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that it should be the policy of the United 

3 States to prioritize getting our Nation’s military and 

4 trainees the COVID–19 vaccine as soon as reasonably 

5 practicable. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
## Ex p re ss January 16, 2015
Hearing Docket Federal Aviation Administration 600 Independence Avenue S.W. Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2W1 000 Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Le ga l D e p a rt m e n t 3 6 20 Ha ck s C ros s R o ad Bu i ld i ng B, 3rd f l oo r M e mp h i s, TN 38 1 25 U S



## JA>! 2 0 

## 2015 'f'

..

### f:J,,**HiNG** 

## DOCKE T 

# d 0 ' 

# L\ ·- \ \ \**~**

RE: Request for Formal Hearing- FAA Case Number: 2014NW720005 Dear Sir: In response to the Final Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that was issued in FAA case number 2014NW720005 and received by my office on January 9, 2015 , Federal Express, in accordance with 14 CFR 13.16(g)(2)(ii), respectfully requests a hearing in this matter. A copy of this request is being sent to Charles Raley, FAA Headquarters , 800 Independence Avenue S.W., Washington , DC 20591. All correspondence regarding this matter should be sent to my attention at 1700 Penns ylvania Avenue, N.W., Suite 950, Washington, DC 20006. If there are any questions, please call me at (202) 393-9285 o r email greg.stofko@fedex.com. Sincerely, FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION



### <::< ? /)

. . / {

.

- ·· ... 2

. - c -

/

.

·**~~ .·.** **.** /

_ / .·**9Jk ::f;-';-;;7~**  '='**/-~'3'''//,_** /



## a;eg · &

- si o Senior Attorney Regulatory Affairs Office: (202) 393-9285 greg.stofko@fedex.com
cc: Charles Rale y
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Registrant is a limited partnership which invests in real estate and real
estate joint ventures.  In accordance with industry practice, its balance
sheet is unclassified.  For full information, refer to the accompanying
unaudited financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       5,817,414
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,843,099
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             113,399,417<F1>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  87,180,927<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               113,399,417<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,043,717<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,737,990
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,305,727
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,305,727
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,305,727
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    12.73<F5>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include net investments
in real estate of $66,345,835, investments in joint ventures of $37,222,719
and net deferred leasing commissions of $1,170,350.
<F2>Represents partners' capital.
<F3>Liabilities include accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $269,634
and minority interests in consolidated joint ventures of $25,948,856.
<F4>Total revenue includes rent of $6,464,537, equity in earnings of joint
ventures of $2,177,628, gain on sale of land of $161,883 and interest and 
other revenue of $239,669.
<F5>Represents net income per Unit of limited partnership interest.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

Watts Premier, Inc., Watts Regulator Co.,

and Watts Water Technologies, Inc.

,

Appellant s

,

v.

Texas Farmers Insurance Company as

Subrogee of Francisco Mercado

,

Appellee

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 6

- 00 232

- C V

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 3

of El Paso C ounty, Texas

(TC# 2016 D CV0690 )

O R D E R

Pending before the Court is the parties’ joint motion to abate. The motion is GRANTED.

We therefore abate the appeal until January 25, 2017. The parties shall file their motion to

dismiss the appeal or their motion for continuation of abatement on or be fore January 25, 2017

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 27th day of October , 20 1 6

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure , C.J., R odriguez and Hughes , JJ.
No. 12-5480.

#### Hagood *v.*Reynolds, Warden.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# Y2006
Tennessee