alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2023071EN.01002601.xml

| 27.2.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 71/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.2.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 71/26

---

Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2022 — International Masis Tabak v EUIPO — Philip Morris Brands (Representation of a pack of cigarettes)

(Case T-44/22) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Figurative mark representing a pack of cigarettes - Earlier international figurative mark Marlboro SELECTED PREMIUM TOBACCOS - Relative ground for refusal - Damage to reputation - Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2023/C 71/33)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: International Masis Tabak LLC (Masis, Armenia) (represented by: C. Bercial Arias and K. Dimidjian-Lecompte, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Schäfer and D. Gája, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Philip Morris Brands Sàrl (Neuchâtel, Switzerland) (represented by: L. Alonso Domingo, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 15 November 2021 (Case R 261/2021-5).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders International Masis Tabak LLC to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders International Masis Tabak LLC to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 119, 14.3.2022.

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 218 (Thursday, November 10, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 70168]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-28532]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

Meetings of Humanities Panel

AGENCY: The National Endowment for the Humanities.

ACTION: Notice of additional meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), notice is hereby given that the 
following meeting of the Humanities Panel will be held at the Old Post 
Office, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20506.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael P. McDonald, Advisory 
Committee Management Officer, National Endowment for the Humanities, 
Washington, DC 20506; telephone (202) 606-8322. Hearing-impaired 
individuals are advised that information on this matter may be obtained 
by contacting the Endowment's TDD terminal on (202) 606-8282.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The proposed meeting is for the purpose of 
panel review, discussion, evaluation and recommendation on applications 
for financial assistance under the National Foundation on the Arts and 
the Humanities Act of 1965, as amended, including discussion of 
information given in confidence to the agency by the grant applicants. 
Because the proposed meeting will consider information that is likely 
to disclose trade secrets and commercial or financial information 
obtained from a person and privileged or confidential and/or 
information of a personal nature the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, pursuant 
to authority granted me by the Chairman's Delegation of Authority to 
Close Advisory Committee meetings, dated July 19, 1993, I have 
determined that the meeting will be closed to the public pursuant to 
subsections (c)(4), and (6) of section 552b of Title 5, United States 
Code.
    Date: November 14, 2011.
    Time: 10:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m.
    Room: 421.
    Program: This meeting, which will be by teleconference, will review 
an application for the Civil War Sesquicentennial in America's 
Historical and Cultural Organizations Grants Program, submitted to the 
Division of Public Programs at the August 17, 2011 deadline.

Michael P. McDonald,
Advisory Committee, Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-28532 Filed 11-9-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7536-01-P
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Francis D. Gerace, President and Chief Executive Officer of Multi-Color Corporation (the Company), certify pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 7, 2006



By:

/s/ Francis D. GeraceFrancis D. GeracePresident andChief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                             255
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,680
<ALLOWANCES>                                       144
<INVENTORY>                                      5,793
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,108
<PP&E>                                          39,145
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,764
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  44,224
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,864
<BONDS>                                         21,894
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           245
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,513
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    44,224
<SALES>                                         14,191
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,191
<CGS>                                           11,541
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,541
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,149
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 476
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,022
<INCOME-TAX>                                       409
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                613
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       613
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .24


</TABLE>
No. 12-5392.

#### Bowen *v.*Bowen.

Ct. App. Utah. Certiorari denied.
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1248 

Expressing support for the designation of December 3, 2020, as the ‘‘National 

Day of 3D Printing’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 3, 2020 

Mr. FOSTER (for himself, Mr. TAKANO, Ms. STEVENS, Mr. RYAN, and Mr. 

BROOKS of Alabama) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of December 3, 2020, 

as the ‘‘National Day of 3D Printing’’. 

Whereas additive manufacturing, also known as 3D printing, 

is a process by which digital 3D design data is used to 

build up a component in layers by depositing material; 

Whereas 3D printing creates an object layer by layer, greatly 

reducing waste and increasing efficiency compared to traditional manufacturing techniques; 

Whereas 3D printing has grown exponentially over the last 

several years; 

Whereas the United States is a world leader in advanced 

manufacturing, and has a history of design innovation; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1248 IH 

Whereas public-private partnerships that promote advanced 

manufacturing, such as America Makes, Manufacturing x 

Digital, and other Manufacturing USA institutes, will develop enhanced digital capabilities to design and test new 

products and reduce costs in manufacturing processes 

across a variety of industries; 

Whereas 3D printing has widespread applications in home 

construction, home goods production, biotechnology, the 

automotive sector, aerospace, medicine, consumer electronics, and defense; 

Whereas 3D printing has the potential to reshape manufacturing in the United States, by decreasing the cost of 

producing goods for small businesses and local manufacturers; 

Whereas innovation will be increased, as 3D printing reduces 

the time required for product development and market 

launch; and 

Whereas December 3, 2020, would be an appropriate date to 

designate as the ‘‘National Day of 3D Printing’’: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the designation of the ‘‘National 

3 Day of 3D Printing’’; 

4 (2) recognizes the economic impact of 3D print5 ing and the positive implications of 3D printing for 

6 the United States advanced manufacturing sector; 

7 and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1248 IH 

1 (3) encourages the promotion and celebration of 

2 3D printing technology. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### DONALD MCBURNEY *v.*COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

(AC 33074)

DiPentima, C. J., and Beach and Bear, Js.

Submitted on briefs March 22

officially released April 16, 2013

Per Curiam.

The appeal is dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 110 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 110

    Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require a 
    specific oath be administered to any witness appearing before a 
                               committee.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 2019

Mr. Johnson of Louisiana submitted the following resolution; which was 
                   referred to the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require a 
    specific oath be administered to any witness appearing before a 
                               committee.

    Resolved, That clause 2(m)(2) of rule XI of the Rules of the House 
of Representatives is amended by striking ``may administer oaths to 
witnesses'' and inserting ``shall administer the following oath to 
witnesses: `Do you solemnly swear or affirm that the testimony that you 
are about to give is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the 
truth, so help you God?'''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 12-5180.

#### Honesto *v.*Adams, Warden, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, James F. Wirth, Chief Executive Officer ofInnSuites Hospitality Trust (the “Company”), do hereby certify in accordancewith 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1. TheAnnual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended January 31,2005 (the “Annual Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

2. Theinformation contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: May 16, 2005 | By:    | /s/   James F. Wirth |   |
|-------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------|--------|
|                    |   | Name:  James F. Wirth               |
|                    |   | Title:  Chief Executive Officer     |

 

----
## TECHNICAL SUPPORT DOCUMENT:

ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAM

FOR CONSUMER PRODUCTS AND

COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT:

RESIDENT IAL DEHUMIDIFIERS

December 2013

U.S. Department of Energy

Assistant Secretary

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

Building Technologies Program

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards

Washington, DC 20585This Document was prepared for the Department of Energy

and by staff members of

Navigant Consulting, Inc.

and

Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
# C_2023261EN.01003502.xml

| 24.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 261/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 261/35

---

Judgment of the General Court of 7 June 2023 — Sanity Group v EUIPO — AC Marca Brands (Sanity Group)

(Case T-541/22) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark Sanity Group - Earlier EU figurative mark SANYTOL - Relative ground for refusal - Detriment to reputation - Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2023/C 261/49)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Sanity Group GmbH (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: B. Koch and V. Wolf, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Klee, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: AC Marca Brands, SL (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: D. Pellisé Urquiza and J.C. Quero Navarro, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 22 June 2022 (Case R 2107/2021-1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Sanity Group GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Sanity Group GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 408, 24.10.2022.

---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 2 (Friday, January 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 441]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-67]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 33305]


Union Pacific Railroad Company--Acquisition Exemption--Idaho 
Northern & Pacific Railroad Company

    Union Pacific Railroad Company (UP), a Class I rail carrier, has 
filed a notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1180.2 to acquire trackage and 
right-of-way owned by Idaho Northern & Pacific Railroad Company (INP) 
and previously authorized for abandonment, subject to negotiations for 
trail use,<SUP>1 between milepost 1.0, near Weiser, and milepost 84.1 
at Rubicon, in Washington and Adams Counties, ID (Line). UP notes that 
it has no plan to reactivate rail service on the Line at this time, 
although reactivation for rail service would be possible in the future 
if the Line were conveyed to a trail user under the Trails Act. In its 
notice, UP has stated that, if trail use negotiations are unsuccessful, 
UP will abandon the Line pursuant to the authorization granted in 
Docket No. AB-433 (Sub-No. 2X).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Abandonment of the Line was authorized in Idaho Northern & 
Pacific Railroad Company--Abandonment and Discontinuance Exemption--
in Washington and Adams Counties, ID, Docket No. AB-433 (Sub-No. 2X) 
(ICC served Nov. 1, 1995). In addition, the Interstate Commerce 
Commission, by decision served December 28, 1995, issued a notice of 
interim trail use under the National Trails System Act, 16 U.S.C. 
1247(d) (Trails Act).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    UP's acquisition transaction was expected to be consummated on or 
after December 19, 1996.
    As a condition to this exemption, any employees adversely affected 
by the transaction will be protected under New York Dock Ry.--Control--
Brooklyn Eastern Dist., 360 I.C.C. 60 (1979).
    If the notice contains false or misleading information, the 
exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 
U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. The filing of a petition to 
revoke does not automatically stay the transaction.
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 33305, must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, Office of the Secretary, Case Control Branch, 1201 Constitution 
Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20423. In addition, a copy of each 
pleading must be served on Joseph D. Anthofer, Esq., 1416 Dodge Street, 
Omaha, NE 68179.

    Decided: December 23, 1996.

    By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-67 Filed 1-2-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
# C_2023024EN.01002401.xml

| 23.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/24

---

Appeal brought on 23 September 2022 by Tigercat International Inc. against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 13 July 2022 in Case T-251/21, Tigercat International Inc. v EUIPO

(Case C-612/22 P)

(2023/C 24/31)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Tigercat International Inc. (represented by: B. Führmeyer, Rechtsanwalt, E. B. Matthes, Rechtsanwalt)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), Caterpillar Inc.

By order of 05 December 2022, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) held that the appeal was not allowed to proceed and that Tigercat International Inc. should bear its own costs.

---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 59 (Thursday, March 27, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 14678]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-7758]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP96-320-009]


Koch Gateway Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

March 21, 1997.
    Take notice that on March 18, 1997, Koch Gateway Pipeline Company 
(Koch) tendered for filing to be part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Fifth 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff sheets:

Effective February 5, 1997: Fourth Revised Sheet No. 29
Effective March 1, 1997: Fifth Revised Sheet No. 29

    Koch states that this filing contains the tariff sheet which 
provides the additional information required by the Commission's March 
7, 1997, Order Rejecting Tariff Sheet. Koch states this filing also 
provides the tariff sheet which removes the negotiated rate contracts 
effective March 1, 1997.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Regulations. All such protests must be filed in accordance 
with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining appropriate action to be 
taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-7758 Filed 3-26-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# C_2023216EN.01004502.xml

| 19.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 216/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 216/45

---

Judgment of the General Court of 26 April 2023 — Pinar Kuruyemiş Gida Ve Ihtiyaç Maddeleri Sanayi Ticaret v EUIPO — Yadex International (pinar KURUYEMIŞ)

(Case T-148/22) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark pinar KURUYEMIȘ - Earlier German word mark PINAR - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Right to be heard - Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Suspension of proceedings - Article 71(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625)

(2023/C 216/60)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Pinar Kuruyemiş Gida Ve Ihtiyaç Maddeleri Sanayi Ticaret AŞ (Karatay, Konya, Türkiye) (represented by: M.E. López Camba and A.M. Lyubomirova Geleva, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Klee, M. Eberl and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Yadex International GmbH (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: P. Kohl, lawyer)

Re:

By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 12 January 2022 (Case R 1149/2021-1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Pinar Kuruyemiş Gida Ve Ihtiyaç Maddeleri Sanayi Ticaret AŞ to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and by Yadex International GmbH for the purposes of the proceedings before the Court. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Pinar Kuruyemiş Gida Ve Ihtiyaç Maddeleri Sanayi Ticaret AŞ to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and by Yadex International GmbH for the purposes of the proceedings before the Court.

---

(1)  OJ C 198, 16.5.2022.

---
# Title I, Part A

- ESEA Flexibility Requests and Related Documents This page provides access to ESEA Flexibility Requests submitted by states, and other related documents.
- Support for States Technical Assistance DocumentsAccountability Addendum to ESEA Flexibility Request [MS Word, 1.8M] and Sample Addendum [PDF, 643K]
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We have issued our report dated December 13, 2007, except for Notes 2,
3, 5, 10, 14, 16, 18, 23 and 24, as to which the date is May 19, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedules, and our report dated December 13, 2007, except for the material weakness described in that
report, as to which the date is May 19, 2008, with respect to internal control over financial reporting included in the Annual Report of Resource America, Inc. and subsidiaries on Form 10-K/A for the year ended September 30, 2007. We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of Resource America, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No. 333126344, effective July 1, 2005, File No. 333105615, effective May 28, 2003, File
Nos. 33398505 and 33398507, effective August 22, 2002, File No. 33381420, effective January 25, 2002 and File No. 33337416, effective May 19, 2000).



|                          
|--------------------------
|/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP    
|                          
|Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
|May 19, 2008