alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2023035EN.01003502.xml

| 30.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 35/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 35/35

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Oristano (Italy) lodged on 9 November 2022 — S.G. v Unione di Comuni Alta Marmilla

(Case C-689/22)

(2023/C 35/42)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale di Oristano

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: S.G.

Defendant: Unione di Comuni Alta Marmilla

Question referred

Must Article 31(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and Article 7(2) of Directive 2003/88/EC, (1) also considered separately, be interpreted as precluding national provisions or practices, justified by compliance with public finance restrictions, under which staff, including managerial staff, of public administrative bodies may not under any circumstances, upon termination of their employment relationship, be granted monetary benefits in lieu of leave accrued but not taken?

---

(1)  Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time (OJ 2003 L 299, p. 9).

---
No. 12-5928.

#### Miranda-Lopez *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# C_2022198EN.01005901.xml

| 16.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 198/59 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 198/59

---

Action brought on 21 March 2022 — Lilly Drogerie v EUIPO — Lillydoo (LILLYDOO kids)

(Case T-150/22)

(2022/C 198/84)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Lilly Drogerie d.o.o. Belgrade (Stari Grad) (Belgrade, Serbia) (represented by: E. Bojinova-Miller, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Lillydoo GmbH (Frankfurt am Main, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the mark LILLYDOO kids — International registration designating the European Union No. 1 495 352

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 January 2022 in Joined Cases R 903/2021-2 and R 1298/2021-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs incurred by the applicant in relation to the present action. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs incurred by the applicant in relation to the present action.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           BD
<LEGEND>

    THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION   EXTRACTED  FROM
CONSOLIDATED   STATEMENT  OF  FINANCIAL   CONDITION  -  DECEMBER  31,  2000 AND
CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENT OF INCOME AS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10K DECEMBER 31, 2000.

</LEGEND>
<NAME>    First Montauk Financial Corp.
<CIK>     0000083125
<MULTIPLIER>                       1,000


<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   Year

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                         3,701
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,445
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                            0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                          0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                            3,975
<PP&E>                                         2,305
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                16,913
<SHORT-TERM>                                   0
<PAYABLES>                                     3,806
<REPOS-SOLD>                                   0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                            0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                             386
<LONG-TERM>                                    5,012
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    35
<COMMON>                                       4,063
<OTHER-SE>                                     3,605
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  16,913
<TRADING-REVENUE>                              7,131
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                           3,252
<COMMISSIONS>                                 46,530
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                  2,417
<FEE-REVENUE>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              160
<COMPENSATION>                                  46,801
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (648)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      (655)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 (34)
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (689)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.08)



</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7098

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

v. 

RITA MARSHAL O’NEIL, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, Chief District 

Judge. (4:10-cr-00203-TLW-7) 

Submitted: September 9, 2015 Decided: September 14, 2015

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Rita Marshal O’neil, Appellant Pro Se. Carrie Fisher Sherard, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, 

for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2

PER CURIAM: 

Rita Marshal O’neil appeals the district court’s order 

granting her motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. United States v. O’neil, No. 

4:10-cr-00203-TLW-7 (D.S.C. June 16, 2014). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
#### STATE OF CONNECTICUT *v.*MICHAEL SCATENA

(AC 34881)

Beach, Bear and Lavery, Js.

Argued October 9

officially released October 29, 2013

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1


                   Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                      As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
                      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Digital Fuel, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do certify, to my
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
          of the Company.


Date: October 30, 2008



/s/ Michael R. Farley
-------------------------
Michael R. Farley
Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTEREDPUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-119238 and 333-61927) ofMagStar Technologies, Inc. of our report dated February 24, 2005, whichexpresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relatingto the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, appearing in thisAnnual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006.
|  | /s/ VIRCHOW, KRAUSE & COMPANY, LLP |
|--|----------------------------------------|

 

**Minneapolis,Minnesota**

**March 27, 2007**

----
#### MARC R. PAGE *v.*COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

(AC 20770)

Lavery, C. J., and Foti and Hennessy, Js.

Submitted on briefs April 26

officially released May 22, 2001

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed.
#### *In re*Estate of Rickabaugh

111,389

02/18/2016

Granted.

51 Kan. App. 2d 902
Appendix A.  1989 CBECS Data File Documentation

                      File 3: Operating Hours and Weather 
                                 (CBECS89.A03)
 
Ques-
tion-
naire   Variable                                  Variable   Variable  Variable
item    Description                               Name       Position  Format  
       
CASEID  Building identifier                       BLDGID4      1-   5
        Census region                             REGION4      7-   7  $REGION.
        Census division                           CENDIV4      9-   9  $CENDIV.
B2      Square footage                            SQFTC4      11-  12  $SQFTC.
        Principal building activity               PBA4        14-  15  $ACTIVTY.
E9AFROM Monday thru Friday opening hour           MFBGN4      17-  21  TIME5.
E9ATO   Monday thru Friday closing hour           MFEND4      23-  27  TIME5.
E9BFROM Saturday opening hour                     SATBGN4     29-  33  TIME5.
E9BTO   Saturday closing hour                     SATEND4     35-  39  TIME5.
E9CFROM Sunday opening hour                       SUNBGN4     41-  45  TIME5.
E9CTO   Sunday closing hour                       SUNEND4     47-  51  TIME5.
        Weekday hours open (Mon. thru Fri.)       MFHRS4      53-  57
        Saturday hours open                       SATHRS4     59-  63
        Sunday hours open                         SUNHRS4     65-  69
        Total weekly hours open                   WKHRS4      71-  73
E10     Total weekly hours open                   WKHRSC4     75-  75  $WKHRSC.
F3      Year construction was completed           YRCONC4     77-  78  $YRCONC.
        Adjusted weight                           ADJWT4      80-  87
        Variance stratum                          STRATUM4    89-  90
        Pair indicator                            PAIR4       92-  92
        Electricity supplied                      ELSUPL4     94-  94  $XXSUPL.
        Natural gas supplied                      NGSUPL4     96-  96  $XXSUPL.
        Fuel oil supplied                         FKSUPL4     98-  98  $XXSUPL.
        Steam supplied                            STSUPL4    100- 100  $XXSUPL.
        Hot water supplied                        HWSUPL4    102- 102  $XXSUPL.
        Heating Degree-Days (Base 65 F)           HDD654     104- 108  COMMA6.
        Cooling Degree-Days (Base 65 F)           CDD654     110- 114  COMMA6.
        Average 1989 temperature (F)              TEMPAVG4   116- 120
        Std. dev. of 1989 temperature (F)         TEMPSTD4   122- 126
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed October 19, 2018.

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-18-00932-CV

IN RE JIMMY HENSLEY, JR. AND DEE BROWN, INC., Relators

Original Proceeding from the 101st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-02065

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Bridges, Brown, and Boatright

Opinion by Justice Brown

Before the Court are relators’ petition for writ of mandamus and relators’ motion to dismiss 

this proceeding. We grant the motion and dismiss this original proceeding. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.1(a)(1).

180932F.P05

/Ada Brown/

ADA BROWN

JUSTICE
Home>Transportation Home Page> **Special 
  Topics**
 Special TopicsChange 
          in Method for Estimating Fuel Economyfor the 1988 and subsequent RTECS (Released 09/12/2000)
		  
        Can Household Members 
          Accurately Report How 
          Many Miles Their Vehicles Are Driven? (Released 08/03/2000)
        
		Calculate your Regional 
          Gasoline Costs of Driving using the Transportation Calculator 
          updated for new model years! Choose your car or SUV and see the gasoline 
          part of the cost of driving in various parts of the country using EIA's 
          current weekly prices. This application uses DOE/EPA's Fuel Economy 
          Guide to set the MPG, but you can change it to compare your estimate 
          of your car's mpg to the average of everyone else who takes the test. 
          (Released 04/11/2000; Updated Yearly for Fuel Economies and Weekly 
          for Fuel Prices)
          
                  
     
	 
	  
        
		       
	    
                    
		 Contact:mark.schipper@eia.doe.gov
        Mark Schipper
        Survey Manager
        Phone: 202-586-1136
        Fax: 202-586-0018
        URL: http://www.eia.gov/emeu/rtecs/special.htmlIf you are having any technical problems with this site, please contact the EIA
    Webmaster at wmaster@eia.doe.gov
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 04533**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket** **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  04533\04533_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 04533\04533_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04533\04533_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04533\04533_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04533\04533_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04533\04533_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

04533\Certification Statement Plant ID 04533.pdf Plant certification statement x 04533\Supplemental Documents\04533_00705-02.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

04533\Supplemental Documents\04533_Monroe aerial.PNG Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 04533\Supplemental Documents\04533_MPP POND 1.pptx Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 04533\Supplemental Documents\04533_MPP POND 2.pptx Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 04533\Supplemental Documents\04533_MPP Water Balance 1.pptx Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 04533\Supplemental Documents\04533_MPP WWT 1.docx Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 04533\Supplemental Documents\04533_MPP WWT 2.pptx Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 04533\Supplemental Documents\04533_MPP WWT 3.pptx Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 04533\04533_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

04533\04533_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
800 Independence Ave., SW.

Washington, DC 20591

June 26, 2014

Mr. Nicholas E. Calio

President and CEO

Airlines for America

1301 Pennsylvania Avenue , NW

. Washington, DC 20004

Mr. Roger Cohen

President

Regional Airline Association

2025 M Street NW., Suite 800

Washington, DC 20036

Mr. Lee Moak

President

A ir Line Pilots Association, International

1625 Massachusetts Avenue, NW.

Washington, DC 20036

Mr. A. Oakley Brooks

President

National Air Carrier Association

1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1700

Arlington, Virginia 22209

Dear Mr. Calio , Mr. Cohen, Mr, Moak , and Mr. Brooks :

This is in response to Airlines for America (A4A) , Air Line Pilots Association, Inc. (ALPA)

, Regional Airline Association (RAA) , and National Air Carrier Association’s ( NACA)

November 1, 2013 letter sent to the public docket (No. FAA

- 201 3

- 0983) petitioning the

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to amend Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations

( 14 CFR) § 121.333(c)(3). If granted, t h e petition for rulemaking would increase the

maximum altitude (from flight level 250 to flight level 410) at which one pilot is required to

wear an oxygen mask when the other pilot leaves his or her station a t the controls

.

I n accordance with 14 CFR § 11.73, the FAA use s the following criteria when making a

decision as to whether to amend current regulations b ased on a petition for rulemaking:2

1. the immediacy of the safety or security concerns the petition raises;

2. the priority of other FAA issues; and

3. the resources available to address these issues.

The FAA has a priority list for rulemaking that addresses man y issues crucial to the safety of

the aviation community and the traveling public. The FAA must prioritize its limited

rulemaking resources to provide the greatest safety benefit to the aviation system as a whole.

Your petition expresses concerns relating to higher maximum altitude, harmon ization with

International Civil Aviation Organization Standards and Recommended Practices (SARPS),

visibility and movement of Federal Flight Deck Officers (FFDO) and pilots at their duty

stations, premature failure of mask materials, an d risks of pilots contracting transmissible

diseases.

While the FAA appreciates and shares your concern for aviation safety, we have determined

that the issue you raise is not an immediate safety concern

, would not provide a level of

safety equivalent to that provided by the regulation , and that we do not have the resources

necessary to proceed with rulemaking at this time. For this reason, we deny your petition to

amend § 121.333(c)(3) . Although the FAA has decided to deny the request, your commen ts

and reasons for a rule change will be considered if the agency undertakes future rulemaking

in this area. Accor dingly, Docket No. FAA

- 2013

- 0 983 is being closed.

Sincerely,

/s/

Jodi L. Baker

D eputy Assistant Division Manager

,

Air Transporation Division
#### State v. Booth

111,565

12/14/2015

Denied.

Unpublished
#### WANGS ALLIANCE CORPORATION, DBA WAC Lighting Co., Appellant v. PHILIPS LIGHTING NORTH AMERICA CORP., Appellee

2017-1531

2017-1532

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 14, 2018

Etai Lahav, Radulescu LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellant. Also represented by David C. Radulescu, Michael D. Sadowitz, Tigran Vardanian.

Mark Christopher Fleming, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Boston, MA, argued for appellee. Also represented by Cynthia D. Vreeland; Arianna Evers, Robert Manhas, Washington, DC.

(Prost, Chief Judge, O’Malley and Taranto, Circuit Judges).

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           9
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                  2,829
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                  1,097
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                        2,333
<TRADING-ASSETS>                        0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>             29,225
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                  2,182
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                    2,145
<LOANS>                                 66,782
<ALLOWANCE>                             661
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          111,822
<DEPOSITS>                              99,325
<SHORT-TERM>                            0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                     855
<LONG-TERM>                             166
<COMMON>                                252
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<OTHER-SE>                              11,223
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>          111,822
<INTEREST-LOAN>                         2,695
<INTEREST-INVEST>                       965
<INTEREST-OTHER>                        118
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                        3,778
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                      2,011
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      2,017
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                   1,761
<LOAN-LOSSES>                           66
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                      50
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                         1,468
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         522
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>              425
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                            425
<EPS-BASIC>                           1.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                           1.06
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                          3.66
<LOANS-NON>                             292
<LOANS-PAST>                            207
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                        0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                         0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                        732
<CHARGE-OFFS>                           151
<RECOVERIES>                            14
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                       661
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                    661
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                     0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                 0


</TABLE>
|
|

|Energy Market and Economic Impacts of H.R. 2454, the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009                                                                                                                            
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Table B3. Assumed Gross and Net Supply Schedule of International Offsets from Developing Countries (million metric tons carbon dioxide equivalent).  Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800.
|Table B3. Assumed Gross and Net Supply Schedule of International Offsets from Developing Countries (million metric tons carbon dioxide equivalent).  Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800.
|Table B3. Assumed Gross and Net Supply Schedule of International Offsets from Developing Countries (million metric tons carbon dioxide equivalent).  Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800.
|Table B3. Assumed Gross and Net Supply Schedule of International Offsets from Developing Countries (million metric tons carbon dioxide equivalent).  Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800.
H. Res. 1072 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

July 30, 2020. 

Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are 

hereby, elected to the following standing committees of the 

House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE: Mr. Balderson. 

COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS: Mr. Green of Tennessee. 

COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY: Mr. Garcia of 

California. 

COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES: Mr. Stauber. 

Attest: 

Clerk.