alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|
|

|Energy Market and Economic Impacts of H.R. 2454, the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009                                                                                             
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Figure 1. Reference Case GHG Emissiojns, Covered Emissions, and Cap, 2005-2030 (million metric ton CO2-equivalent).  Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800).
|Figure 1. Reference Case GHG Emissiojns, Covered Emissions, and Cap, 2005-2030 (million metric ton CO2-equivalent).  Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800).
|Figure 1. Reference Case GHG Emissiojns, Covered Emissions, and Cap, 2005-2030 (million metric ton CO2-equivalent).  Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800).
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 59 (Thursday, March 27, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 14704]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-7751]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--``Cost Effective Planar Solid Oxide Fuel Cells 
for Power Generation''

    Notice is hereby given that, on March 3, 1997, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. Sec. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Babcock & Wilcox Company has 
filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General 
and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the identities of the 
parties and (2) the nature and objectives of the venture. The 
notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plantiff's to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Pursuant to Section (b) of the 
Act, the identities of the parties are: The Babcock & Wilcox Company, 
Alliance, OH; Intertec Southwest LLC, Tucson, AZ; and SOFCo L.O., Salt 
Lake City, UT. The project's general areas of planned activities is to 
develop and demonstrate Cost Effective Planar Solid Oxide Fuel Cells 
for Power Generation pursuant to NIST Competition No. ATP-G-96-01. The 
activities of this Joint Venture will be partially funded by an award 
from the Advanced Technology Program, National Institute of Standards 
and Technology, Department of Commerce.
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

Joint Venture Worksheet

    A. Name of venture: ``Cost Effective Planar Solid Oxide Fuel Cells 
for Power Generation''

Nature of notification: X original    supplemental

    Concise statement of purpose: To develop and demonstrate Cost 
Effective Planar Solid Oxide Fuel Cells for Power Generation pursuant 
to NIST Competition No. ATP-G-96-01.
    B. For ventures involving research and development only:

Identity of parties to the venture:
    1. The Babcock & Wilcox Company, Alliance, OH
    2. Intertec Southwest LLC, Tucson, AZ
    3. SOFCo L.P., Salt Lake City, UT

[FR Doc. 97-7751 Filed 3-26-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1256 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1256

Supporting President Trump's efforts to ensure that every legal vote is 
 counted in the November 2020 Presidential election and to investigate 
       and bring to justice those who perpetrate election fraud.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 10, 2020

    Mr. Buck (for himself, Mr. Duncan, and Mr. Biggs) submitted the 
  following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House 
                             Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Supporting President Trump's efforts to ensure that every legal vote is 
 counted in the November 2020 Presidential election and to investigate 
       and bring to justice those who perpetrate election fraud.

    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports President Trump's efforts to ensure that every 
        legal vote is counted in the November 2020 Presidential 
        election; and
            (2) supports President Trump's efforts to investigate and 
        bring to justice those who perpetrate election fraud.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 23.1
 
 
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 We have issued our reports dated December 11, 2009, with respect to the consolidated financial statements, schedules and internal control over financial reporting included in the Annual Report of Resource America, Inc. and subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2009.  We hereby consent to the incorporation
by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of Resource America, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No. 333158557, effective April 13, 2009; File No. 333126344, effective July 1, 2005, File No. 333105615, effective May 28, 2003; File Nos. 33398505 and 33398507, effective August 22, 2002; File No. 33381420, effective January 25, 2002 and File No. 33337416, effective May 19, 2000).
 
 
 /s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
 
 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
 December 11, 2009
ex108.htm




Ex. 10.8


 







 


Mehdizadeh Employment Understanding


 







 


(i)       Salary. Consultant shall receive a base monthly salary Compensation in the amount of $12,500 payable to Vincent Chase, Inc. ("Base Salary").


 


(ii)      Payment. The Base Salary Compensation shall be payable in accordance with the customary payroll practices of the Company, but in no event less frequently than monthly.
**MEMORANDUM**

DATE: April 11, 2015 TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR

–2013 - 0602 FROM: Howard J. Hoffman , EPA - OGC SUBJECT: April 10, 2015 Phone Call with EDF Regarding Proposed Clean Power Plan for

Existing Power Plants **SUMMARY** On April 10, 2015 , EPA

– OGC discussed legal issues concerning the proposed Clean Power Plan for existing power plants with the Environmental Defense Fund (EDF). **ATTENDEES** Howard J. Hoffman (EPA - OGC) Lorie Schmidt (EPA - OGC) Vickie Patton (EDF) Tomas Carbonell (EDF) Sean Donahue (Goldberg & Donahue)
#### Joseph M. HAMILTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TIFFANY & BOSCO PA; Seterus, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 15-15473

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted February 13, 2018 *

Filed February 26, 2018

Joseph M. Hamilton, Pro Se

David Winthrop Cowles, Tiffany & Bos-co, P.A., Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant-Ap-pellee Tiffany & Bosco PA

Kim Rene Lepore, Attorney, Wright, Finlay *&*Zak, LLP, Scottsdale, AZ, for Defendant-Appellee Seterus, Inc.

Before: LEAVY, FERNANDEZ, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Joseph M. Hamilton appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his action alleging Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”) and state law claims relating to foreclosure proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a district court’s dismissal for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), and we may affirm on any basis supported by the record. *Thompson v. Paul,*547 F.3d 1055, 1058-59 (9th Cir. 2008). We affirm.

Dismissal of Hamilton’s FDCPA claim was proper because Hamilton failed to allege facts sufficient to show that the alleged communications were attempts to collect a “debt” as defined by the FDCPA. *See Ho v. ReconTrust Co.,*858 F.3d 568, 572 (9th Cir. 2017) (“[Ajctions taken to facilitate a non-judicial foreclosure, such as sending the notice of default and notice of sale, are not attempts to collect ‘debt’ as that term is defined by the FDCPA.”); *Dowers v. Nationstar Mortg., LLC,*852 F.3d 964, 970 (9th Cir. 2017) (explaining that “while the FDCPA regulates security interest enforcement activity, it does so only through Section 1692f(6),” and that “[a]s for the remaining FDCPA provisions, ‘debt collection’ refers only to the collection of a money debt”).

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying without prejudice Hamilton’s motion for leave to amend the complaint because Hamilton failed to attach the proposed amended complaint in violation of the local rules. *See Waters v. Weyerhaeuser Mortg. Co.,*582 F.2d 503, 507 (9th Cir. 1978) (court has discretion to deny motion to amend for failing to attach *675proposed pleading as required by local rule).

The district court did not abuse its discretion by declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Hamilton’s state law claims. *See*28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(8); *Ove v. Gwinn,*264 F.3d 817, 826 (9th Cir. 2001) (the district court may in its 'discretion “decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over related state-law claims once it has ‘dismissed all claims over which it has original jurisdiction.’ ” (citation omitted)).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
September 30, 2016

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Operations, M-30

West Building ground floor, 

Room W12-140

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590

Subject: Request for extension of exemption

(Docket Number FAA-2010-1227)

SimCom International Inc., Center number Q8PX038K, is requesting and extension of 

our Exemption No. 10209A which allows relief from the requirements of 14 CFR Part 

91.531(a)(2); 91.531(a)(1); 91.9(a) to the extent necessary to allow SimCom 

International, Inc. to train, test, and certificate pilots to fly the Cessna Citation, CE500 

series aircraft, Single-Pilot.

We assert that the conditions and reasons regarding the public interest and safety made in 

our original application remain unchanged.

Further to our petition we advise that SimCom has officially changed its name and been 

issued a revised training certificate under the name SimCom International, Inc. dba 

SimCom Aviation Training Phoenix effective May 23, 2016.

Sincerely,

Gary W. Santos

Training Center Manager 

SimCom International, Inc.

7860 E. McClain Dr. Suite 1

Scottsdale, AZ 85260

gsantos@simulator.com

(480)905-3040

7860 East McClain, Suite 1, Scottsdale, Arizona 85260 

(480) 905-3040 / (800)293-3035 (480) 951-2709 Fax
Cite as 2013 Ark. App. 627



## ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION III No. CR-13-242

ANDREW DESHAZER APPELLANT V.

STATE OF ARKANSAS APPELLEE Opinion Delivered November 6, 2013 APPEAL FROM THE DREW COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. CV-2007-139-1] HONORABLE SAMUEL B. POPE, JUDGE AFFIRMED; MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED
ROBERT J. GLADWIN, Chief Judge
Appellant, Andrew Deshazer, pled guilty to the offense of theft of property. He was sentenced to sixty months’ probation on February 25, 2008. On June 21, 2011, the State filed a petition to revoke appellant’s probationary sentence alleging that he had violated the terms and conditions of his probation by failing to report and in not fully paying his fees and restitution. Appellant’s probationary sentence was not revoked at that time, but he was ordered by the circuit court to make regular monthly payments on his outstanding balance. A second petition to revoke was filed by the State on July 18, 2012, alleging that appellant violated the terms and conditions of his probation by using controlled substances, failing to submit to drug testing, failing to report, and failing to make court-ordered payments on the restitution balance. A hearing on that petition was held on November 26, 2012, after which appellant was found guilty of violating the terms and conditions of hisCite as 2013 Ark. App. 627

probation by using controlled substances, failing to report to his probation officer, and failing to make court-ordered payments on the restitution balance, particularly between January and August of 2012. The circuit court revoked his probation and sentenced him to twelve months in the regional punishment facility pursuant to a December 7, 2012 sentencing order. He filed a timely notice of appeal on January 4, 2013. Pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4-3(k) (2012), appellant’s counsel has filed a motion to be relieved, stating that there is no merit to the appeal. The motion is accompanied by an abstract and addendum of the proceedings below, including all objections and motions decided adversely to appellant, and a brief in which counsel explains why there is nothing in the record that would support an appeal. The clerk of this court served appellant with a copy of his counsel’s brief and notified him of his right to file a pro se statement of points for reversal within thirty days. Appellant has filed no such statement. From our review of the record and the briefs presented to us, we find compliance with Rule 4-3(k) and that the appeal is without merit. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted, and the revocation is affirmed. Affirmed; motion to withdraw granted. P ITTMANand W OOD , JJ., agree. Potts Law Office , by: Gary W. Potts , for appellant. No reponse.

2
<PAGE>   1


                                                                      Exhibit 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


              We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-00353, No. 333-00355, No.
333-00925, No. 33-15116, No. 333-18125, No. 333-21959, No. 33-15117, No.
33-23856, No. 33-29215, No. 33-29216, No. 33-37579, No. 33-37580, No. 33-45986,
No. 33-50737, No. 33-58437, No. 33-58869, No. 33-58871, and No. 33-59600) of
Raychem Corporation of our report dated July 16, 1997, appearing on page 17 of
the 1997 Annual Report to the Stockholders, portions of which are incorporated
as Exhibit 13 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the
incorporation by reference of our report on the Financial Statement Schedule,
listed in Item 14(a)(2) of this Form 10-K.


/s/  PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP

San Jose, California
September 22, 1997
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 138 

Honoring Concerns of Police Survivors for 25 years of service to family 

members of law enforcement officers killed in the line of duty. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 7, 2009 

Ms. MURKOWSKI (for herself, Mr. DURBIN, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. BEGICH, Ms. 

MIKULSKI, Mr. TESTER, Mr. RISCH, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. DODD, and 

Mrs. BOXER) submitted the following resolution; which was considered 

and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring Concerns of Police Survivors for 25 years of service 

to family members of law enforcement officers killed 

in the line of duty. 

Whereas May 14, 2009, marks the 25th anniversary of the 

founding of Concerns of Police Survivors; 

Whereas, for 25 years, Concerns of Police Survivors has answered one of the highest and most noble calls to service 

by providing compassionate care and support to family 

members of law enforcement officers killed in the line of 

duty; 

Whereas, for 25 years, Concerns of Police Survivors has been 

a bedrock of strength for those family members in helping them rebuild their shattered lives; 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 138 ATS 

Whereas, for 25 years, Concerns of Police Survivors has 

showed the highest amount of concern and respect for 

the tens of thousands of family members of law enforcement officers killed in the line of duty; 

Whereas those family members bear the most immediate and 

profound burden of the absences of their loved ones; 

Whereas Concerns of Police Survivors facilitates healing and 

provides love and renewed life to those family members 

far from the eye of the media and the general public; 

Whereas it is essential that the people of the Unites States 

are made aware of the good works of Concerns of Police 

Survivors and recognize the contributions of Concerns of 

Police Survivors to so many families; and 

Whereas National Police Week, observed in 2009 from May 

10 to May 16, is the most appropriate time to honor 

Concerns of Police Survivors: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) honors Concerns of Police Survivors for 25 

3 years of service to the family members of law en4 forcement officers killed in the line of duty across 

5 the United States; 

6 (2) recognizes and thanks Concerns of Police 

7 Survivors for assisting in rebuilding the shattered 

8 lives of those family members through the organiza9 tion’s invaluable programs; 

10 (3) urges the people of the United States to 

11 join with the Senate in thanking Concerns of Police 

12 Survivors on behalf of the Nation; and 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
3 

•SRES 138 ATS 

1 (4) recognizes with great appreciation the sac2 rifices made by the families of law enforcement offi3 cers killed in the line of duty in providing essential 

4 support to one another. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
No. 12-5128.

#### Richardson *v.*Greene.

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
# C_2022398EN.01002702.xml

| 17.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 398/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 398/27

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 4 August 2022 — Biogen Netherlands v Commission

(Case T-279/22 R)

(Interim relief - Medicinal products for human use - Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 - Marketing authorisation for Dimethyl fumarate Mylan - dimethyl fumarate - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency)

(2022/C 398/33)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Biogen Netherlands BV (Badhoevedorp, Netherlands) (represented by: C. Schoonderbeek, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Haasbeek and A. Sipos, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its application based on Articles 278 and 279 TFEU, the applicant seeks suspension of the operation of Commission Implementing Decision C(2022) 3252 final of 13 May 2022 granting marketing authorisation under Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council for ‘Dimethyl fumarate Mylan — dimethyl fumarate’ as a medicinal product for human use.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
S93Y0674, S93Y1363, S94Y0256, S94Y0259, S94Y0261, S95Y0157.

#### IN THE MATTER OF JOHN N. CRUDUP.

(453 SE2d 29)

Per curiam.

In an opinion issued on April 18, 1994, in Case Nos. S93Y0674, S93Y1363, S94Y0256, S94Y0259, and S94Y0261, Respondent Crudup was suspended from the practice of law for five years provided that he, within thirty days, repaid to each of the complainants the full amount of fees and retainers and returned to the complainants all papers entrusted to him in connection with the representations undertaken by Respondent which led to these disciplinary proceedings; otherwise he would be disbarred as of thirty days from the date of that opinion. The record establishes that Respondent has not complied with the conditions of his suspension. He stands, therefore, dis*28barred from the practice of law in this state effective May 18, 1994.

Decided February 20, 1995.

*William P. Smith III, General Counsel State Bar, Cynthia C. Hinrichs, Assistant General Counsel State Bar,*for State Bar of Georgia.

*Edward W. Clary,*for Crudup.

In Case No. S95Y0157, docketed in this court subsequent to May 18, 1994, the review panel has recommended a three-year suspension, consecutive to the suspension imposed on April 18, 1994, for violating Standards 4, 25 and 45 of Bar Rule 4-102. Since that case was docketed in this court after the effective date of Respondent’s disbarment, it is moot and is, accordingly, dismissed.

*Disbarred in Case Nos. S93Y0674, S93Y1363, S94Y0256, S94Y0259 and S94Y0261. Appeal dismissed in Case No. S95Y0157.*

*All the Justices concur.*
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 47 (Tuesday, March 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11166-11167]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5936]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. CP97-256-000]


K N Wattenberg Transmission Limited Liability Company; Notice of 
Request Under Blanket Authorization

March 5, 1997.
    Take notice that on February 20, 1997, K N Wattenberg Transmission 
Limited Liability Company (K N Wattenberg), P.O. Box 281304, Lakewood, 
CO 80228, filed in Docket No. CP97-256-000, a request pursuant to 
Sections 157.205, 157.208 and 157.211 of the Commission's Regulations 
under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205, 157.208 and 157.211). K N 
Wattenberg requests authorization to install a new delivery lateral 
along with receipt point facilities and two delivery points in Morgan 
County, CO to provide transportation service for two end user shippers, 
under K N Wattenberg's blanket certificate issued in Docket No. CP92-
203-000, pursuant to 18 CFR Part 157, Subpart F of the Natural Gas Act, 
all as more fully set forth in the request which is on file with the 
Commission and open to public inspection.
    Specifically, K N Wattenberg proposes to install approximately 4 
miles of 6-inch pipe, 1 mile of 4-inch pipe, interconnect facilities at 
the upstream end of the proposed lateral with the existing pipeline 
facilities of Colorado Interstate Gas Company in Morgan County, CO, and 
measurement and control facilities at two delivery points. K N 
Wattenberg states that these proposed facilities would provide

[[Page 11167]]

transportation service to Leprino Foods Company and Excel Corporation 
for use in their facilities at Fort Morgan, CO.
    K N Wattenberg also states that the estimated cost of the proposed 
facilities is approximately $725,000. K N Wattenberg further states 
that K N Energy, Inc., K N Wattenberg's parent company, would finance 
the project out of funds on hand or by a loan or an equity investment, 
or a combination of the two.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedureal Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of 
the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, 
the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective on the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-5936 Filed 3-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M