alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
               THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL
               INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE REGISTRANT'S
               CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER
               31, 1996 AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
               OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR THEN ENDED AND IS
               QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
               SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000081699
<NAME>                        Refrigeration Technology, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1996
<CASH>                                           2,578,180
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,088,884
<PP&E>                                           2,015,254
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,539,019
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,244,484
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               94,244
<BONDS>                                            265,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            88,094
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,053,542
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,244,884
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   122,129
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   323,069
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    60,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  22,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (297,182)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (200,940)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     (96,242)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (297,182)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.27)




</TABLE>
No. 11-10993.

#### Gamble *v.*Virginia.

Sup. Ct. Va. Certio-rari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         3788000
<SECURITIES>                                    218000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2579000
<ALLOWANCES>                                     25000
<INVENTORY>                                   16760000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         1992000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1064000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                28368000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    3193000
<COMMON>                                       7712000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  28368000
<SALES>                                       35104000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              36395000
<CGS>                                         28552000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 37200000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              711000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (1516000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (336000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (1180000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (1180000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.47)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 60 (Friday, March 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 14888]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-7886]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[I.D. 020697A]


Formation of Advisory Panels for National Academy of Sciences 
Study on Individual Fishing Quotas; Extension of Deadline

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice extending deadline for nominations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that NMFS is extending the deadline for 
sending nominations for two advisory panels for an Individual Fishing 
Quota study to be conducted by the National Academy of Sciences' 
National Research Council. The advisory panel formation complies with 
the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act as amended 
by the Sustainable Fisheries Act of 1996. The deadline for application 
is being extended to ensure that all interested parties have sufficient 
time to respond to this notice, and to ensure that NMFS has the widest 
range of applicants from which to select panel members.

DATES: Interested parties should submit a statement of interest by 
April 14, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Send statements of interest to the Director of the Office of 
Science and Technology, NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, 
MD, 20910.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amy Gautam, (301) 713-2328.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Interested parties should refer to the 
previous Federal Register notice on this subject (I.D. 020697A), 
published February 25, 1997, at 62 FR 8429, for further information 
about the role of the advisory panels and what to include in a 
statement of interest. NMFS will announce the selection of advisory 
panel members no later than May 1, 1997.

    Dated: March 24, 1997.
Rolland A. Schmitten,
Assistant Administrator, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 97-7886 Filed 3-27-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


The Westwood Group, Inc.
Revere, Massachusetts

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement
No. 33-312933 on Form S-8 of our audit report dated March 5, 2004 (except for
the matter discussed in Note 14, which is as of March 26, 2004), relating to
the consolidated financial statements of The Westwood Group, which appears in
the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.

/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP

Boston, Massachusetts

April 14, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<CIK> 0000819028
<NAME> AMERICAN FILM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CAPTION>
<S>                                            <C>    
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         247,025
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               483,281
<PP&E>                                         514,740
<DEPRECIATION>                               (117,134)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,990,422
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,178,555
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       146,802
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,079,144
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,990,422
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  977,418
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              61,748
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (977,418)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (487,045)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)
        

</TABLE>
## In The **Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo** 

________________________ No. 07 - 21 - 00057 - CV ________________________ JESSICA E. SEARSY, APPELLANT V. CODY FULLER, APPELLEE On Appeal from the County Court at Law N umber 1 Lubbock C ounty, Texas Trial Court No. 2015 - 515 , 136 ; Honorable Mark J. Hocker , Presiding September 9 , 20 2 1 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before PIRTLE and PARKER and DOSS, JJ. Appellant, Jessica E. Searsy , appeals from the trial court’s Final Orders in Suit to Modify Parent - Child Relationship . Searsy’ s brief was originally due August 12 , 2021, but was not filed. By letter of August 1 9 , 2021, we notified Searsy that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution, without further notice, if a brief was not received by August 30 . To date, Searsy has not filed a brief or had any further communication with this c ourt.2 Accordingly, we dismiss her appeal for want of prosecution. See T EX . R. A PP . P . 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). Per Curiam
#### Rafael Alejandro Abarca MERCADO, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 17-70373

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted February 13, 2018 *

Filed February 22, 2018

Rafael Alejandro Abarca' Mercado, Pro Se

David Nicholas Harling, Trial Attorney, DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of *625Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent

Before: LEAVY, FERNANDEZ, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Rafael Alejandro Abarca Mercado, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. *Zehatye v. Gonzales,*453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir. 2006). We deny the petition for review.

We reject, as without merit, Mercado’s argument that the IJ erred in finding him removable, where Mercado conceded the allegations and the charge that he did not have a valid entry document at the time he sought entry to the United States and does not dispute these concessions on appeal. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(7)(i)(I).

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Mercado failed to demonstrate a nexus between the harm he suffered and fears and a protected ground. *See Zetino v. Holder,*622 F.3d 1007, 1016 (9th Cir. 2010) (desire to be free from harassment by criminals motivated by theft or random violence by gang members has no nexus to a protected ground). Thus, in the absence of nexus to a protected ground, Mercado’s asylum and withholding of removal claims fail. *See id.*at 1015-16.

Finally, substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of Mercado’s CAT claim because he has not shown it is more likely than not he would be tortured by the government of Mexico or with its consent or acquiescence. *See Aden v. Holder,*589 F.3d 1040, 1047 (9th Cir. 2009).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Home > Households, 
      Buildings & Industry >Transportation 
      Surveys > Household 
      Vehicles Energy Use >Figure 
      30Figure 30. Decomposition 4941 of Energy Use by Effect, 1988-1994, 1991-1994, and 1994-2001
No. 11-1231.

#### Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services *v.*Auburn Regional Medical Center et al.

C. A. *956D. C. Cir. [Certiorari granted, *ante,*p. 933.] John F. Manning, Esq., of Cambridge, Mass., is invited to brief and argue this case as *amicus curiae*in support of the position that the 180-day statutory time limit for filing an appeal with the Provider Reimbursement Review Board from a final Medicare payment determination made by a fiscal intermediary, 42 U. S. C. § 1395oo(a)(3), may not be extended for any period.
No. 11-10676.

#### Hill *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 7 (Friday, January 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1433-1434]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-635]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
[A-570-832]


Pure Magnesium From the People's Republic of China (PRC): 
Rescission of Notice of Initiation of New Shipper Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 10, 1997.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Everett Kelly or Dorothy Tomaszewski, Import Administration, 
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 
Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone 
(202) 482-4194 or 482-0631, respectively.

Applicable Statute and Regulations

    Unless otherwise indicated, all citations to the Tariff Act of 
1930, as amended (the Act), are references to the provisions effective 
January 1, 1995, the effective date of the amendments made to the Act 
by the Uruguay Round Agreements Act. In addition, unless otherwise 
indicated, all citations to the Department's regulations are to the 
current regulations, as amended by the interim regulations published in 
the Federal Register on May 11, 1995 (60 FR 25130).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    In accordance with section 751(a)(2)(ii) of the Act and 19 CFR 
353.22(h)(6) Taiyuan Heavy Machinery Import and Export Corporation 
(Taiyuan) requested a new shipper administrative review of the 
antidumping duty order on pure magnesium from the PRC. The Department 
of Commerce (the Department) inadvertently published two notices of 
initiation, one on December 30, 1996 (Notice of Initiation of New 
Shipper Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Pure Magnesium from the 
People's Republic of China (60 FR 68712, 68713 December 30, 1996) and 
one on December 31, 1996 (Notice of Initiation of New Shipper 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Pure Magnesium from the 
People's Republic of China (61 FR 69067 December 31, 1996).

Rescission of Initiation of Review

    The December 30, 1996, notice of initiation was published in error 
and is hereby rescinded. We are proceeding to conduct a review of 
Taiyuan for the period May 1, 1996 through October 31,

[[Page 1434]]

1996, pursuant to the December 31, 1996, notice of initiation.

    Dated: January 6, 1997.
Jeffrey P. Bialos,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 97-635 Filed 1-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-M
#### Graham v. Herring

112,498

02/18/2016

Denied.

Unpublished
#### Sphabmixay v. Rubbermaid, Inc.

112,945

02/18/2016

Denied.

Unpublished
#### Al-Haroon B. HUSAIN, petitioner, v. Patrick S. LAYNG.

No. 17-845.

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
November 12 , 2015

Stacey Chance Discovery Bay Studios 1854 Seal Way Discovery Bay, CA 94505 captainchance@gmail.com Cell 925

- 216

-4454 FAA Docket Management Facility U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE West Building, Ground Floor, Room W12

- 140 Washington, DC 20590 Dear Exemption Manager, In reference to Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 2744 dated June 24, 2015. I am submitting the requested additional information describing the aircraft. **UAS Description:** T h e UAS we plan to use is a DJI Phantom 2 . It is a small rotorcraft in the quadcopter configuration with an advertised weight of less than 46 Ounces (1280g) designed primarily to carry aloft a high definition camera. It has an advertised maximum speed of les s than 32 knots (16m/s) and a maximum climb rate of less than 1000 feet per minute (5 m/s). It is powered by four electric motors with a distance between motors of less than 12 inches (289.5mm) It utilizes an internal inertial measuring unit (IMU) with int egrated barometric sensor augmented with global positioning system (GPS) to maintain its geospatial orientation and position. It is controlled primarily through an FCC certified radio control (RC) unit. Real time video and telemetry information is transmitted back to a ground control

. It has failsafe modes of operation for either loss of RC or GPS signal. The onboard flight controller can limit altitude and maximum altitude can be preprogrammed by the PIC. Battery life limits flight times to approximately 2 3 minutes with external lighting cues before reaching a low battery state. An automatic termination of flight and landing will be initiated when the battery reaches a predetermined low state. It is anticipated that flights will usually last less than 10 mi nutes. More information is available at http://www.dji.com Sincerely, Stacey Chance Discovery Bay Studios
# C_2022171EN.01004501.xml

| 25.4.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.4.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/45

---

Action brought on 10 March 2022 — Katjes Fassin v EUIPO (THE FUTURE IS PLANT-BASED)

(Case T-133/22)

(2022/C 171/62)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Katjes Fassin GmbH & Co. KG (Emmerich am Rhein, Germany) (represented by: T. Schmitz and S. Stolzenburg-Wiemer, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: Application for EU word mark THE FUTURE IS PLANT-BASED — Application No 18 310 582

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 December 2021 in Case R 1023/2021-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council, read in conjunction with Article 7(2) thereof.

---
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 41450

STATE OF IDAHO
,

Plaintiff-Respondent
,

v.

KENNETH DEWAIN McCURDY
,

Defendant-Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2014 Unpublished Opinion No. 566

Filed: June 16, 2014

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED
OPINION AND SHALL NOT
BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada County. Hon. Patrick H. Owen , District Judge.

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of seven years, with a minimum period of confinement of one year , for felony driving under the
influence

, affirmed

.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appell ate Public Defender; Shawn F. Wilkerson, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for ap pellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________
Before LANSING, Judge; GRATTON, Judge; and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Kenneth Dewain McCurdy pled guilty to felony driving under the influence . I.C. §§ 18

- 8004, 18

- 8005(6) . In exchange for his guilty plea, an additional charge was dismissed. The

district court senten ced McCurdy to a unified term of seven years, with a minimum period of

confinement of one year

. McCurdy appeals.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 1 14, 117

- 18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014

- 15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 Idaho 447, 449

- 51, 680 P.2d 869, 871

- 73 (Ct. App.2 1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, McCur dy ’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
No. 12-5378.

#### Norman *v.*California.

Sup. Ct. Cal. Certio-rari denied.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Eli Vernon III a/k/a Eli Mims, * From the 43rd District

 Court of Parker County,

 Trial Court No. CR13-0053.

Vs. No. 11-13-00218-CR * September 25, 2014

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Willson, J.

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is 

no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.