alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 68 (Friday, April 8, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 20827]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-07546]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Defense Acquisition Regulations System


Early Engagement Opportunity: Implementation of National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2022

AGENCY: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense 
(DoD).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: DoD announces an early engagement opportunity regarding 
implementation of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2022 within the acquisition regulations.

DATES: Early inputs should be submitted in writing via the Defense 
Acquisition Regulations System (DARS) website shown below. The website 
will be updated when early inputs will no longer be accepted.

ADDRESSES: Submit early inputs via the DARS website at https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/early_engagement.html. Send inquiries via 
email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2b44584f054f4d4a59586b464a424705464247"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="58372b3c763c3e392a2b183539313476353134">[email protected]</span></a> and reference ``Early Engagement 
Opportunity: Implementation of NDAA for FY 2022'' in the subject line.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennifer D. Johnson, telephone 703-
717-8226.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: DoD is providing an opportunity for the 
public to provide early inputs on implementation of the National 
Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2022 within the 
acquisition regulations. The public is invited to submit early inputs 
on sections of the NDAA for FY 2022 via the DARS website at https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/early_engagement.html. The website will be 
updated when early inputs will no longer be accepted. Please note, this 
venue does not replace or circumvent the rulemaking process. DARS will 
engage in formal rulemaking, in accordance with 41 U.S.C. 1707, when it 
has been determined that rulemaking is required to implement a section 
of the NDAA for FY 2022 within the acquisition regulations.
    Authority: DoD Instruction 5000.35, Defense Acquisition Regulations 
(DAR) System.

Jennifer D. Johnson,
Editor/Publisher, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.
[FR Doc. 2022-07546 Filed 4-7-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 12-5667.

#### Acevedo *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Refac, a Delaware corporation (the Company), for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of Robert L. Tuchman, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Raymond A. Cardonne, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and result of operations of the Company.



|                                                                        |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|                                                                       
|/S/    ROBERT L.
TUCHMAN                                               
|Robert L. Tuchman President, Chief Executive Officerand General Counsel



March 30, 2004





|                                                                         |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | 
|                                                                        
|/S/    RAYMOND A. CARDONNE,
JR.                                         
|Raymond A. Cardonne Vice President, Secretary andChief Financial Officer



March 30, 2004



This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION
I, Geoffrey D. Knapp, certify that:
1.     I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of CAM CommerceSolutions, Inc;
2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and
c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and
5.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Dated: August 13, 2003       By: /s/Geoffrey D. KnappGeoffrey D. KnappChief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 51 (Monday, March 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 12642]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6661]



[[Page 12642]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-1162-DR]


Arkansas; Amendment to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of Arkansas (FEMA-1162-DR), dated March 2, 1997, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 4, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3260.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident 
period for this disaster is closed effective March 4, 1997.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 83.516, Disaster 
Assistance)
Lacy E. Suiter,
Executive Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 97-6661 Filed 3-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
AAM-12-323-E May 21, 2012

Exemption No. 10535 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2012-0432

Ms. Carol Wrenn Sky River Helicopters, LLC

92 Pill Hill Road Bernardsville, NJ 07924

Dear Ms. Wrenn:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated April 11, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Sky River Helicopter, LLC (SRH) for an exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Codeof Federal Regulations (14 CFR) to the extent necessary to allow SRH to cover its safetysensitive employees under one drug and alcohol testing program.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to SRH.

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two drug and alcohol testing programs into one would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of safety to that provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unnecessary to burden the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs.2

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703;

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 also apply to the situation you present; and

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant Sky River Helicopters, LLC an exemption from 14 CFR part 120 to the extent necessary to allow SRH to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one drug and alcohol testing program, subject to the conditions and limitations

described below.

Conditions and Limitations

1. Employees of SRH are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91.

2. The drug and alcohol program must be implemented under the same auspices of the SRH part 135 operation, not under part 91.

This exemption terminates on May 31, 2014, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/
James R. Fraser, M.D. Deputy Federal Air Surgeon

Enclosure
No. 12-5282.

#### Ochoa *v.*Workman, Warden.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Ash-Shahid v. State

112,216

12/14/2015

Denied.

Unpublished
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, John V. Winfield, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual reporton Form 10-K/A of Santa Fe Financial Corporation;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

 

Date: August 24, 2012	

 

/s/ John V. Winfield

John V. Winfield

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-6270

TERRY J. MOORE, 

 Plaintiff – Appellant, 

 v. 

J. MILLER, Corrections Officer; A. TAYLOR, Corrections Officer; 

CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BROWN; SERGEANT DAY, 

 Defendants – Appellees. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District 

Judge. (7:08-cv-00614-gec-mfu) 

Submitted: October 14, 2009 Decided: November 2, 2009 

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Terry J. Moore, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Terry J. Moore appeals the district court’s orders 

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915A(b) (2006) and denying his motion for reconsideration. 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Moore v. Miller, No. 7:08-cv-00614-gec-mfu (W.D. Va. 

Jan. 15, 2009; Feb. 11, 2009). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
R1

R2

ATTACHMENT EIGHT: 

ALKYLBENZENE SULFONATE SODIUM SALT PRODUCTION 

CONFIDENTIAL
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6361

LLOYD GREEN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge.

(CA-96-616-19BD)

Submitted: July 14, 1998 Decided: July 30, 1998

Before HAMILTON, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lloyd Green, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy

Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying relief on

his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.

1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

Green v. South Carolina, No. CA-96-616-19BD (D.S.C. Feb. 18, 1997).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 53 (Wednesday, March 19, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 12987]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-7121]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Friday, April 18, 1997.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C. 9th Fl. Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 97-7121 Filed 3-17-97; 3:40 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
**DJI Phantom 3 Advanced Checklist**

**Preflight:** WX conditions and Wind limits checked to be within tolerance (do not attem pt to fly in winds exceeding 20km/hr) Propellers securely installed, undamaged and not excessively bent (unbend by hand if necessary) Cam era lens cap and gim bal clam p rem oved SD card installed Fully charged battery installed and secure Place Phantom on level surface away from nearby obstacles, into the wind and facing away from operator

**Power**

**- up:**  Power on WiFi extender Transmitter switches S1 & S2 in the UP position Power on transmitter Check transmitter battery level (solid green light) Power on Phantom Perform a com pass calibration if your location has changed significantly (see m anual) Confirm W iFi extender has a flashing green system li ght Open Wifi settings on your Android or Apple device and connect to Phantom _XXXXXX Open the DJI Vision app and click CAMERA.

**Before tak eoff:**  Confirm satellite lock and return

- to

- hom e point is loaded (rapidly flashing green LED followed by steady flashin g) Point aircraft into the wind Confirm cam era control and FPV by briefly tilting camera up and down If recording video, push RECORD Observers warned that Phantom is taking off Takeoff: Clim b away from obstacles, into the wind and above head height Establi sh a hover and confirm Phantom will hold position with GPS Confirm FPV is streaming and adjust view angle as necessary Note battery level and takeoff time

**Mission:**Note tim e enroute and establish a “bingo time” when you must return home

to have adequate b attery to get home. 30% battery life is recommended by DJI .

**CAUTION:** Winds will affect this greatly, allow extra time to return if return will be into the wind Maintain radio and visual line

- of

- sight (VLOS) Utilize a spotter to maintain visual contact wh en available Always verify recording status during the mission

**R ecovery:**  Preferred recovery is by hand, especially on uneven terrain or with tall vegetation Establish a hover above head height and a safe distance away then move towards the Phantom and gra b the landing gear Once the Phantom is securely held above head level, hold the throttle stick to the down position for three seconds Do not m ove the Phantom to below head level until the blades have stopped

com pletely.

**Postflight:** Power off the Phantom, transmitter and Wifi extender Rem ove the SD card and secure Any visible moisture present on the system shall be wiped off prior to storage If m oisture was present during the flight, do not seal the Phantom in the case for a prolonged period until it can be aired out in a dry environment for a mi nim um of eight hours Charge the Wifi extender, Phantom batteries and ensure extra transmitter batteries are available for the next mission Download the contents of the SD card, delete from the SD card and re

- install into the Phantom
### May 2009 National Industry-Specific Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates

**NAICS 321000 - Wood Product Manufacturing** 43-0000 Office and Administrative Support Occupations $15.47 11-0000Management Occupations $45.86 15-0000 Computer and Mathematical Science Occupations $27.58 

### Sector 42 - Wholesale Trade 43-0000 Office and Administrative Support Occupations $15.91 11-0000Management Occupations $58.12 15-0000 Computer and Mathematical Science Occupations $37.33 

### Sectors 44 and 45 - Retail Trade 43-0000 Office and Administrative Support Occupations $12.04 11-0000Management Occupations $44.06 15-0000 Computer and Mathematical Science Occupations $28.21 **Data extracted 3/21/2011** http://www.bls.gov/oes/2009/may/oessrci.htm#42
No. 12-5571.

#### Schiro *v.*United States.

C. A. 7th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
No. 12-5683.

#### Gunter *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 47 (Tuesday, March 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 11250]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5913]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

RTCA, Inc., Special Committee 192; National Airspace Review 
Planning and Analysis

    Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(P.L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is hereby given for the 
Special Committee 192 meeting to be held March 26-27, 1997, starting at 
9:00 a.m. This new special committee is being established to provide 
recommendations on the design and use of the national airspace. The 
airspace review is a necessary step in achieving the concept of free 
flight and transition to a mature air traffic management system. The 
review includes use of domestic and oceanic airspace and is intended to 
result in changes that will achieve the most efficient airspace design 
for customer operations while maintaining the highest standards of 
safety. The meeting will be held at RTCA, 1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW, 
Suite 1020, Washington, DC 20036.
    The agenda will be as follows: (1) Chairman's Introductory Remarks; 
(2) Approval of Proposed Meeting Agenda; (3) Terms of Reference Review/
Approval; (4) Presentations; (5) Other Business; (6) Set Agenda for 
Next Meeting; (7) Date and Place of Next Meeting.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the RTCA Secretariat, 
1140 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 1020, Washington, DC 20036; (202) 
833-9339 (phone); (202) 833-9434 (fax); or http://www.rtca.org (web 
site). Members of the public may present a written statement to the 
committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on March 4, 1997.
Janice L. Peters,
Designated Official.
[FR Doc. 97-5913 Filed 3-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-13-M
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 180 

To authorize testimony and legal representation in United States v. Edward 

Bloomer, Frank Cordaro, Elton Davis, Chester Guinn, and Renee Espeland. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 9, 2009 

Mr. REID (for himself and Mr. MCCONNELL) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

To authorize testimony and legal representation in United 

States v. Edward Bloomer, Frank Cordaro, Elton Davis, 

Chester Guinn, and Renee Espeland. 

Whereas, in the cases of United States v. Edward Bloomer 

(CVB# H5049055), Frank Cordaro (CVB# H5049056), 

Elton Davis (CVB# H5049058), Chester Guinn (CVB# 

H5049093), and Renee Espeland (CVB# H5049095), 

pending in Federal district court in the Southern District 

of Iowa, the prosecution has sought testimony from 

Dianne Liepa, a former employee of Senator Tom Harkin; 

Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the 

Ethics in Government Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. 288b(a) and 

288c(a)(2), the Senate may direct its counsel to represent former employees of the Senate with respect to 

WWOODS2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS

2 

SRES 180 ATS 

any subpoena, order, or request for testimony relating to 

their official responsibilities; 

Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States 

and rule XI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the possession of the Senate may, by the judicial or administrative process, be 

taken from such control or possession but by permission 

of the Senate; and 

Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or 

in the possession of the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will take such action as will 

promote the ends of justice consistent with the privileges 

of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That Dianne Liepa is authorized to testify 

2 in the cases of United States v. Edward Bloomer, Frank 

3 J. Cordaro, Elton Davis, Chester Guinn, and Renee 

4 Espeland, except concerning matters for which a privilege 

5 should be asserted. 

6 SEC. 2. The Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to 

7 represent Dianne Liepa, and any other employee from 

8 whom evidence may be sought, in connection with the tes9 timony authorized in section one of this resolution. 

Æ 

WWOODS2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS