alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         281,977
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,083,004
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,893,783
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,403,490
<PP&E>                                      17,366,631
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,926,814
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,707,831
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,288,734
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,236,891
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,707,831
<SALES>                                     49,320,481
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            49,501,848
<CGS>                                       45,455,455
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,376,758
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             550,850
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   669,635
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
fi OG/22/2010 15:49 FAX 2024935142 FAA •> DMS @|001/00 2 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIOlO —^ ^ r - > > 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS " i C "<^,^ 1^ | {/pTg^ 

WASHINGTON, D.C. ° ^ >'^uj 

^'•- ^'' 5 zn n 

IN THE MATTER OF 

DARBY AVIATION 

FAA Docket No. CP08SO0026 

FAA Case No. 2008SO090020 

DMS NO. f AA-2008-1192 

Administrative Law .Judge Isaac D. Benkin 

AGENCY'S NOTICE OF APPEAL 

COMES NOW the Agency and in accordance with sections 13.233(a) and 

13.211(e)' of the Rules of Practice in FAA Civil Penalty Actions (14 CFR §§13.233(a) smd 

13.211(e)) files this Notice of Appeal of the Administrative Law Judge's Initial Decision 

served June 3, 2010 in the above matter. 

Resppcifully submitted. 

••'^C DOCKET 

-TlA-YMOND VEATCH 

.--•• "Attorney 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

June 17,2010. 

' The Iniiial Decision was served upon Agency Counsel only by Fiisi Clas.s Regular Mail. In accordance 

wjih 14 CFR § 13.211 (e) the last date for filing a notice of appeal would be J une 18, 2010. 

:(HV . ='''• ' • . . •-• • •• 
0G/22_^10 15:49 FAX 2024935142 FAA * DMS EIOO2/OO2 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that a copy of this document has been served this date by e-mail and 

regular mail to; 

Dcanna L. Weidner, Esq. 

David Anderson Esq. 

595 N. 20'"' Street, Suite 1450 

Birmingham, AL 35203 

e-mail to: DLWcidner@davidbandersonlaw.com, 

DBAndeTSon@,davidbandeTSonlaw-fom, iyfDawson@davidbandersonlaw.com 

Federal Aviation Administration 

600 Independence Avenue, SW. 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk.^AGC-430 

/ 

7 \/j:d^''' 

RAYMOND VEATCH 

Attorney 

date 

.(."- ' I 

2
# hr2454cafe.0729a

Total Energy Supply and Disposition Summary

Energy Consumption by Sector and Source

Energy Prices by Sector and Source

Residential Sector Key Indicators and Consumption

Commercial Sector Key Indicators and Consumption

Industrial Sector Key Indicators and Consumption

Transportation Sector Key Indicators and Delivered Energy Consumption

Electricity Supply, Disposition, Prices, and Emissions

Electricity Generating Capacity

Electricity Trade

Liquid Fuels Supply and Disposition

Petroleum Product Prices

Natural Gas Supply, Disposition, and Prices

Oil and Gas Supply

Coal Supply, Disposition, and Prices

Renewable Energy Generating Capacity and Generation

Carbon Dioxide Emissions by Sector and Source

Macroeconomic Indicators

Energy-Related Carbon Dioxide Emissions by End Use

Renewable Energy Consumption by Sector and Source 1/

Greenhouse Gas Compliance Results
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of Duke Energy Indiana, Inc. (Duke Energy Indiana) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James E.
Rogers, Chief Executive Officer of Duke Energy Indiana, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Duke Energy Indiana.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 12, 2010



/s/    JAMES E.
ROGERSJames E. RogersChief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 21


                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



                                             Jurisdiction
            Name (l, 2)                   of Incorporation
   ------------------------------------  ------------------

   Refac International, Ltd.                   Nevada
      Refac Biochemics Corporation (3)         Delaware
      Refac Consumer Products, Inc.            Delaware
         Refac (H.K.) Limited                  Hong Kong
      Refac Financial Corporation              Delaware
   Refac Licensing, Inc. (4)                   Delaware

 (1) The Consolidated Financial Statements, incorporated herein, include the
     accounts of the Registrant and all of the above subsidiaries.

 (2) Subsidiaries of subsidiaries are indented; unless otherwise indicated
     below, direct and indirect subsidiaries are 100% owned.

 (3) The Company owned approximately 92% of the outstanding capital stock of
     Refac Biochemics Corporation as of December 31, 2000.

 (4) The Company owned approximately 81% of the outstanding capital stock of
     Refac Licensing, Inc. as of December 31, 2000.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

IN RE: FORTIETH STATEWIDE 

INVESTIGATING GRAND JURY

PETITION OF: B.K.

:

:

:

:

:

No. 94 WM 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 14th day of December, 2018, in consideration of the Petition for 

Review, the temporary redaction of Petitioner’s name and other identifying information 

from Report 1 of the Fortieth Statewide Investigating Grand Jury is made permanent. See

In re Fortieth Statewide Investigating Grand Jury, 190 A.3d 560 (Pa. 2018); In re Fortieth 

Statewide Investigating Grand Jury, 2018 WL _________ (Pa. Dec. 3, 2018). 

The Application to File under Seal is GRANTED. The Motion to Unseal and the 

Application to Lift Stay are DENIED. The Application for Stay is DISMISSED AS MOOT. 

Jurisdiction is relinquished.

The instant order is unsealed.
WORKING GROUP PRESENTATION FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY.

DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE AS RESULTS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE.

JULY 19, 2018

MEMORANDUM FOR: Ian Mead

Assistant Administrator for Energy Analysis

FROM: Lynn Westfall

Director, Office of Energy Markets & Financial Analysis

SUBJECT: Summary of AEO2019 Macroeconomic Working Group held on July 19, 

2018

This memorandum provides an overview of the presentation given for the only Macroeconomic Working 

Group meeting that will be held for AEO2019 and a summary of the resulting discussion that took place. 

The presentation materials are available in a separate document.

Model updates

The meeting began with EIA staff providing an overview of Macroeconomic Module (MAM) and the

currently anticipated changes for AEO2019. Given that this is a lite AEO year, changes are minimal. 

Material covered both macroeconomic growth and industrial output and focused on the following 

highlights:

• Planned model updates include new versions of the U.S. macro, industrial output and 

employment by industry from IHS Markit.

• In preliminary AEO2019 runs, real GDP is projected to grow 1.9%/year on average from 2018-

2050. This rate is down one tenth of a percent relative to that in AEO2018 and is consistent with 

the current forecasts of many others.

• The importance of consumption, fixed nonresidential investment, and imports in the demand 

mix fades over the projection period as exports becomes more important.

• In preliminary AEO2019 runs, manufacturing output is projected to grow 2.0%/year on average 

from 2018-50. Nonmanufacturing output is expected to grow 1.3%/year on average over the 

same period.

• Employment growth is projected to become more concentrated in service and construction

industries.

Additional issues

Participants had no questions after the presentation. In addition, participants were informed that the 

slides on will soon become available the AEO Working Group webpage. An email notifying all attendees 

on the invitation list will also be sent once they are posed.
WORKING GROUP PRESENTATION FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY.

DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE AS RESULTS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE.

Attendees

Guests (WebEx/phone)

Andre Barbe International Trade Commission

Neal Elliott American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy

Bob Hershey Private consultant

Frederick Joutz Private consultant

Ethan Rogers American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy

Jerry Schwartz American Forest & Paper Association

Sharon Showalter On Location, Inc.

EIA attendees (in person)

Tom Lorenz EIA

Ian Mead EIA

EIA attendees (WebEx/phone)

Angelina LaRose EIA
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 55 (Friday, March 21, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 13582-13583]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-7252]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 97-92, RM-9032]

Radio Broadcasting Services; Mukwonago, WI

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document requests comments on a petition filed by Faith 
Congregation proposing the allotment of Channel 287A to Mukwonago, 
Wisconsin, as that community's first local broadcast service. There is 
a site restriction 11.8 kilometers (7.3 miles) west of the community at 
coordinates 42-54-15 and 88-27-55.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before May 5, 1997, and reply 
comments on or before May 20, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC. 20554. In 
addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties should 
serve the petitioner's counsel, as follows: Henry E. Crawford, 1150 
Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite 900, Washington, DC. 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Scheuerle, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Notice 
of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 97-92, adopted March 5, 1997, 
and released March 14, 1997. The full text of this Commission decision 
is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the Commission's Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW., 
Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractors, International 
Transcription Services, Inc., 2100 M Street, NW., Suite 140, 
Washington, DC. 20037, (202) 857-3800.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of l980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments.

[[Page 13583]]

See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing permissible ex parte contact.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 97-7252 Filed 3-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
```
Home 
          > Households, 
            Buildings & Industry >  Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey (CBECS) > Background Information on CBECS > Census Regions and Divisions Map   
        
              U. S. Census Regions and Divisions:Map of the U.S. Census Regions and DivisionsReturn to CBECS Home Page**Contacts:**              
  
Specific questions on these products may be directed to:       
Joelle Michaelsjoelle.michaels@eia.doe.gov
        CBECS Manager
URL: http://www.eia.gov/consumption/commercial/data/archive/cbecs/census_maps.html
The purpose of this meeting was to discuss the 4 petitions for exemptions

requested by PrecisionHawk. The FAA informed the PrecisionHawk that the 

submitted justification regarding equivalent level of safety requires supplemental 

information that which Precisionhawk must provide. During this meeting the FAA 

and Precisionhawk also discussed the submitted statement indicating benefits to 

the public should be documented adequately. 

Extended Visual Line of Sight Pathfinder Two Meeting

UAS Engagement Team and PrecisionHawk 

March 10, 2016

# Topic of discussion Presenter Outcome

1 Roll Call Rob

Pappas

Attendance 

2 Formal discussion on 4 Exemptions requested

by PrecisionHawk for EVLOS:

 14 CFR 61.113 Private pilot privilege

 14 CFR 91.119 Minimum Safe Altitude

 14 CFR 91.121 Altimeter setting

 14 CFR91.151 Fuel requirements

Rob Discussion

EVLOS Attendance:

Rob Pappas, Geme, Gelgelu, Thomas Haun, Ally Ferguson, Mike Maples, Matt Degarmo

Telcon Attendees: Jake Troutman, Ben Borelli, Jim Ryan
No. 12-5560.

#### Creek *v.*United States et al.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         123,290
<SECURITIES>                                    28,080
<RECEIVABLES>                                  119,934
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               269,611
<PP&E>                                         103,008
<DEPRECIATION>                                  78,315
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 430,581
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          165,178
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           249
<OTHER-SE>                                     256,375
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   430,581
<SALES>                                        108,200
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               108,200
<CGS>                                           50,022
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   51,837
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (713)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,054
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,715
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,339
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,339
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .12


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER     I, M. Michael Owens, Chief Financial Officer of United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. (the“Company”), hereby certify that to my knowledge: (1) The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the“Form 10-K”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2) The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.          Dated: March 13, 2006 /s/ M. Michael Owens         M. Michael Owens    Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Filed 2/8/11 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2011 ND 16

Derek Lynn Foreid, Petitioner and Appellant

v.

State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee

No. 20100325

Appeal from the District Court of Ward County, Northwest Judicial District, the Honorable Douglas L. Mattson, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Mark T. Blumer, P.O. Box 475, Valley City, N.D. 58072, for petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief.

Rozanna C. Larson, State’s Attorney, P.O. Box 5005, Minot, N.D. 58702-5005, for respondent and appellee; submitted on brief.

Foreid v. State

No. 20100325

Per Curiam.

[¶1]Derek Foreid appeals from a trial court order summarily dismissing his application for post-conviction relief.  On appeal, Foreid alleges prosecutorial misconduct and ineffective assistance of counsel, and asserts he was entitled to an evidentiary hearing.  We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6) and (7).  See, e.g., Ude v. State, 2009 ND 71, ¶ 12, 764 N.W.2d 419 (affirming an order summarily dismissing an application for post-conviction relief because the petitioner failed to present any competent evidence raising an issue of material fact).

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Mary Muehlen Maring

Daniel J. Crothers

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Dale V. Sandstrom
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE TWENTY-FOUR WEEK PERIOD ENDED
OCTOBER 12, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-03-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-12-1996
<CASH>                                          20,825
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  121,808
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,966
<INVENTORY>                                    172,958
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               331,256
<PP&E>                                         228,629
<DEPRECIATION>                                 103,985
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 627,911
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          304,580
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        68,974
<OTHER-SE>                                     156,197
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   627,911
<SALES>                                      1,493,023
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,493,023
<CGS>                                        1,337,504
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,337,504
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               112,060
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,259
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 41,796
<INCOME-TAX>                                    16,779
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             25,017
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    25,017
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.53
        

</TABLE>
No. 11-11105.

#### Rydland *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-28-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-27-1998
<CASH>                                          13,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,634,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  4,563,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,814,000
<PP&E>                                      29,388,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              11,845,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              29,541,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,165,000
<BONDS>                                     11,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,895,000
<COMMON>                                     9,600,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (7,003,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                29,541,000
<SALES>                                     36,640,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            36,640,000
<CGS>                                       31,526,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               35,253,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (144,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             858,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                673,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                      224,000
<NET-INCOME>                                   897,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.30
        

</TABLE>