alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.8





 Certain identified information has been excluded from this exhibit because it is both
not material and is the type that the registrant treats as private or confidential. Information that was omitted has been noted in this document with a placeholder identified by the mark “[***]”. 

Exhibit 10.8 
 AMENDMENT
#2 to the AMENDED AND RESTATED 
 COLLABORATION AND LICENSE AGREEMENT 

This Amendment #2 to the Amended and Restated Collaboration and License Agreement (“Amendment”), effective July 18, 2016 (the
“Amendment #2 Effective Date”), is by and between Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc., with headquarters at 7100 NW 62nd Avenue, PO Box 1014,
Johnston, Iowa 50131-1014, USA (“Pioneer”), and Caribou Biosciences, Inc., located at 2929 7th St., Suite 105, Berkeley, California 94710 (“Caribou Bio”) (Caribou Bio and
Pioneer, each individually a “Party”, and together the “Parties”). 
 WHEREAS, the Parties have signed an Amended and
Restated Collaboration and License Agreement dated July 13, 2015 (which as of July 13, 2015, [***] as amended by Amendment #1 to the Amended and Restated Collaboration and License Agreement, dated January 21, 2016. As used in this
Amendment, “Agreement” refers to the Amended and Restated Collaboration and License Agreement, as amended; and 
 WHEREAS, the
Parties desire to further amend the Agreement to clarify certain effects of termination of the Agreement; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the mutual agreements contained in this Amendment, and for good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereto agree as follows: 

 

	1.	 All capitalized terms not defined in this Amendment shall have the meanings set forth in the Agreement.



  

	2.	 Section 9.3 of the Agreement is hereby amended to include the following Subsection 9.3(c) as of the
Amendment #2 Effective Date: 


  

	“c.	 [***] 


  

	3.	 Section 12.3 of the Agreement is hereby replaced in its entirety with the following: “Assigns and
Successors. 


 [***] 
  

	4.	 All other terms of the Agreement remain in full force and effect. 



 

	5.	 This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, including facsimile or scanned PDF documents.
Each such counterpart, facsimile or scanned PDF document shall be deemed and original instrument, and all of which, together, shall constitute one and the same executed Agreement. 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Amendment #2 to the Amended and Restated Collaboration and License Agreement to be executed
by their respective authorized representatives. 
  

									
	Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc.	 		 	Caribou Biosciences, Inc.
					
	By:	 	 /s/ Mathias L. Müller
	 		 	By:	  	 /s/ Rachel E. Haurwitz

	Name: Mathias L. Müller	 		 	Name: Rachel E. Haurwitz
	Title: Director, Business Development	 		 	Title: President and CEO
			
	Date: July 25, 2016	 		 	Date: July 27, 2016
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO 

18 U.S.C. §1350, 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

        Inconnection with this Interim Report on Form 10-QSB of Arrhythmia Research Technology, Inc.(the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), theundersigned Chief Financial Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellant,
v. J ERMAINE EARL MCCLELLAND, AKA Baby Mont, AKA Monty, Defendant - Appellee. No. 13-50082 D.C. No. 2:12-cr-00872-R-1
MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Manuel L. Real, District Judge, Presiding Submitted May 15, 2014 ** Pasadena, California Before: KOZINSKI , Chief Judge, WARDLAW and FISHER , Circuit Judges. The district court lacked authority to impose a sentence below the mandatory minimum. See United States v. Wipf, 620 F.3d 1168, 1170–71 (9th Cir. 2010). 

# FILED
MAY 21 2014 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).page 2 Because McClelland had three criminal histor y points, he was ineligible for safety valve relief. See 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f). Whether the district court believed that McClelland’s criminal history categor y substantially over-represented the seriousness of his criminal history is irre levant because “district courts have no authority to adjust criminal history points for the purpose of determining eligibility for safety valve relief under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f)(1).” United States v. HernandezCastro , 473 F.3d 1004, 1008 (9th Cir. 2007). We therefore vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing.
VACATED AND REMANDED.
No. 12-5556.

#### Somie *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
EXHIBIT NO. 10(c)



AMENDMENT NO. 4

TO THE

ROANOKE ELECTRIC STEEL
CORPORATION

EMPLOYEES STOCK OPTION PLAN



WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of Roanoke Electric Steel Corporation (RESCO) adopted the Roanoke Electric Steel
Corporation Employees Stock Option Plan (the Plan) on November 15, 1988, the shareholders of RESCO approved the Plan on January 16, 1989, and the Compensation and Stock Option Committee of the Board of Directors approved amendments
to the Plan in 1991, 1995 and 1998 to reflect three-for-two stock splits of RESCOs common stock; and



WHEREAS, effective as of June 30, 2003, The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. (Nasdaq) amended its rules (the Amended Rules) relating to
shareholder approval of equity compensation plans, and, based on such amended rules, the Board of Directors believed that it was advisable to amend the terms of the Plan to comply with the terms of the Amended Rules and, on October 21, 2003,
approved an amendment to the Plan in the form set forth herein (the Amendment), subject to interpretative guidance from Nasdaq that the Plan, as amended by the Amendment, would be in compliance with the Amended Rules; and



WHEREAS, by a letter dated November 12, 2003, Nasdaq provided interpretative
guidance that the Amendment would not be considered a material amendment under the Amended Rules and that the Plan, as amended by the Amendment, would be grandfathered plan in compliance with the Amended Rules;



NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that:



| | 1. | Paragraph 6 of the Plan is amended and restated as follows:
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------



| | 6. | Shares Available.
| | -- | -----------------



(a) From and after June 30, 2003 (the Effective Date), there shall be reserved for issuance under the Plan an aggregate of
112,500 shares of the Companys Common Stock with respect to Options granted from and after the Effective Date, subject to the provisions in paragraph 6(c) and 7 of this Plan.



(b) As to Options granted prior to the Effective Date, the aggregate number of shares of the Companys
Common Stock which may be issued upon the exercise of Options granted under the Plan shall not exceed 112,500 per Plan Year, subject to adjustment under the provisions of paragraph 7.



(c) Shares of Common Stock to be issued upon the exercise of options may be authorized but unissued shares
or shares issued or reacquired by the Company. In the event any Options shall, for any reason, terminate or expire or be surrendered without having been exercised in full, the shares subject to such Option but not purchased thereunder shall again be
available for Options granted under the Plan.





---

| | 2. | In all other respects, the Plan is ratified and affirmed.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------



WITNESS the following signature, this 1st day of December, 2003.



ROANOKE ELECTRIC STEEL CORPORATIONBy:

/s/ George B. Cartledge, Jr.Chairman, Compensation and Stock Option
Committee
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1265 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1265

  Expressing support for designation of the week of December 6, 2021, 
   through December 12, 2021, as National United States Miners Week.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 15, 2020

 Mr. Stauber (for himself, Mr. Griffith, Mr. Tiffany, Mr. LaMalfa, Mr. 
Gosar, Mr. Amodei, Mr. Newhouse, Mr. Stewart, Mr. Young, Mr. Mooney of 
  West Virginia, Mr. Bucshon, Mr. Fulcher, Mr. Emmer, Ms. Cheney, Mr. 
 Simpson, Mr. Johnson of South Dakota, Mr. Lamborn, and Mr. McKinley) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                         on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing support for designation of the week of December 6, 2021, 
   through December 12, 2021, as National United States Miners Week.

Whereas December 6 was established by Congress in 2009 to honor the hard work 
        and commitment of miners in the United States;
Whereas America's mining men and women are foundational to modern economies and 
        are necessary for a high quality of life for all citizens;
Whereas the critical minerals and other raw materials harvested by American 
        miners out of domestic mines produce more than $82 billion in raw 
        materials annually;
Whereas the critical minerals and other raw materials unearthed by miners are 
        crucial to secure supply chains needed for steel, roads, houses, cars, 
        smartphones, ventilators, wind turbines, solar panels, and everything 
        else in our world that is not grown;
Whereas America's miners mine or support other industries in all 50 States;
Whereas there are more than 500,000 directly employed miners in America, 
        supporting another 1.8 million jobs in manufacturing, engineering, and 
        environmental sciences;
Whereas each miner in America indirectly supports an additional 3 jobs in 
        spinoff industries such as health care, hospitality, education, and 
        others, and are located in largely rural communities;
Whereas America's miners support billions in State and Federal royalty revenues, 
        funding education, child care, and diversifying economic development in 
        their communities; and
Whereas America would rely more on countries like Russia, China, the Democratic 
        Republic of the Congo, and others who rely on child and slave labor to 
        produce minerals needed for modern life if it weren't for American 
        miners: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the work of America's mining men and women; 
        and
            (2) recognizes the importance of America's miners in 
        securing our domestic supply chains.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                              39
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      614
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        467
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,149
<PP&E>                                           4,124
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,629
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,069
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              731
<BONDS>                                            773
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           100
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,702
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,069
<SALES>                                            934
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   934
<CGS>                                              720
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      720
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  18
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    135
<INCOME-TAX>                                        43
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 92
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        92
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.95
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.95
        

</TABLE>
No. 12-5403.

#### Knowlin *v.*Clarke, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, et al.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# table20
Before the United States Department of Transportation

Washington, DC

September 19, 2013

Essential Air Service at

PUEBLO, COLORADO Docket OST-1999-6589

under 49 U.S.C. 41731 et.seq.

This document contains the response of Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd. to Order Requesting Proposals 

2013-8-4.

Questions and comments may be referred to:

Michael Matthews

Chief Financial Officer

Great Lakes Airlines

1022 Airport Parkway

Cheyenne, WY 82001

(307) 432-7030

Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd. is pleased to submit this proposal to provide essential air transportation for 

passengers traveling to and from Pueblo, CO.

Great Lakes' proposal intends conveniently timed connecting services to our code-share partners 

(United and Frontier) at our Denver Hub. In addition, Great Lakes maintains interline ticketing and 

baggage agreements with the majority of the other carriers serving Denver, including interline eticketing agreements with American Airlines, Delta Airlines, United Airlines and U.S. Airways. 

Passengers may also book their Denver/Pueblo travel utilizing Great Lakes' website or contacting our 

reservation center. All of which will offer passengers maxium access to the domestic and international 

air transportation system.

The proposal contemplates the use of pressurized 19 seat Beech 1900D aircraft which Great Lakes 

has a long history of operating. 
Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd.

Annual Compensation Requirements for Essential Air Service at

Pueblo, Colorado

Two Round Trips - Beech 1900 

(at 98 percent completion)

Departures: 1,221

Block Hours: 808

Revenue Passenger Miles: 953,750

Available Seat Miles: 2,528,691

Operating Revenues:

Passenger PUB 8,750 psgrs at $72.54 $634,725

 

Other: (at 0.62% of passenger revenue) $3,935

Total Operating Revenues: $638,660

Operating Expenses:

Direct: Aircraft and Hull Insurance $370,475

Fuel and Oil $546,015

Flying Operations $159,370

Maintenance $321,482

Total Direct Expenses: $1,397,342

Total Indirect Expenses: $686,676

Total Operating Expenses: $2,084,018

Operating Loss ($1,445,357)

Profit Element (5.0% of Total Operating Expenses) $104,201

Annual Compensation Requirement: $1,549,558

Current published schedules should be used as sample service levels

No Upline scheduling restrictions
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 60310 Summary Calendar

Consolidated w/ 13

- 60359

CHARLES P. PRIDE,

Plaintiff

- Appellant

v. CITY OF BILOXI, MISSISSIPPI; BILOXI COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT; JERRY CREEL, Director Community Development, I ndividually and in his official capacity; TIM CIPPOLA, Individually and in his official capacity; MIKE ANDREWS, Individually and in his official

c apacity; UNKNOWN DEFENDANTS; A. J. HOLLOWAY, Mayor of the City of Biloxi, in his official capacity; GEORGE LAW RENCE, Alderperson in his official capacity; WILLIAM STALLWORTH, Alderperson in his official

c apacity; CHARLES HARRISON, Alderperson in his official capacity; MIKE FITZPATRICK, Alderperson in his official capacity; TOM WALL, A lderperson in his official cap acity; ED GEMMILL, Alderperson in his official capacity; DAVID FAYARD, Alderperson in his official capacity; BILOXI CODE ENFORCEMENT,

Defendants

- Appellees

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USD C No. 1:10

- CV

- 100 United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED January 15, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-60310 Document: 00512502078 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/15/2014No. 13

- 60310 c/w. No. 13

- 60359

Before REAVLEY, JONES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM: * Charles P. Pride brought this action after the City of Biloxi demolished a structure on his property and clea r ed trash and debris from his lot. He asserted various civil rights claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a takings claim, and various tort and con spiracy claims. The district court dismissed most of the claims pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12 and then grant ed summary judgm e nt on the remaining claims. Pride now appeals. Reviewing the record de novo, see , e.g., Curtis v. Anthony , 710 F .3d 587 , 593 (5th Cir. 2013), we affirm for the same reasons articulated by the district court. With the benefit of liberal construction, Pride argues that he suffered an unconstitutional taking and that the defendants engaged in a malicious enforcement a ction, resulting in improper demoli tion and clea r ing of his lot without due process. To the extent that Pride argues there was a taking, the
district court correctly held that Pride’s claims are not ripe. See Williamson Cnty. Reg’l Planning Comm’n v. Ham ilton Bank of Johnson City , 473 U.S. 172,
194

- 95 , 105 S. Ct. 3108 , 3120

- 21 (1985). Furthermore, the record shows that the defendants complied with the notice requirements for a code enforcement action and demolition under Mississippi law. See Miss. Code Ann. § 21

- 19

- 11. Pride’s rambling and conclusory arguments to the contrary may not prevent summary judgment. See Little v. Liquid Air Corp ., 37 F.3d 1069, 1075 (5th Cir. 1994) (en banc).
AFFIRMED.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.
2 Case: 13-60310 Document: 00512502078 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/15/2014
U.S. Energy Information Administration Quarterly Coal Report, October - December 2023

Table 25. Open market sales and average price of coke and breeze

(thousand short tons and dollars per short ton)

Year to date

Commodity October - December

2023

July - September

2023

October - December

2022 2023 2022

Percent

change

Coke

Sales 3,110 3,139 3,428 10,964 10,101 8.5

Average Price 221.78 228.51 215.56 256.02 278.18 -8.0

Breeze

Sales 215 200 232 776 664 16.8

Average Price 93.87 73.94 56.03 87.65 74.04 18.4

Note: Total may not equal sum of components because of independent rounding.

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), Form EIA-3, 'Quarterly Survey of Industrial, Commercial & Institutional Coal Users.' Prior to third quarter 2014,

coke plant data was collected under Form EIA-5, 'Quarterly Coal Consumption and Quality Report - Coke Plants.'
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 142 

Designating July 25, 2009, as ‘‘National Day of the American Cowboy’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 12, 2009 

Mr. ENZI (for himself, Mr. BARRASSO, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. BAUCUS, Mr. 

COBURN, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mr. HATCH, Mr. JOHNSON, and Mr. REID) 

submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Designating July 25, 2009, as ‘‘National Day of the 

American Cowboy’’. 

Whereas pioneering men and women, recognized as ‘‘cowboys’’, helped establish the American West; 

Whereas the cowboy embodies honesty, integrity, courage, 

compassion, respect, a strong work ethic, and patriotism; 

Whereas the cowboy spirit exemplifies strength of character, 

sound family values, and good common sense; 

Whereas the cowboy archetype transcends ethnicity, gender, 

geographic boundaries, and political affiliations; 

Whereas the cowboy is an excellent steward of the land and 

its creatures, who lives off the land and works to protect 

and enhance the environment; 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 142 IS 

Whereas cowboy traditions have been a part of American culture for generations; 

Whereas the cowboy continues to be an important part of the 

economy through the work of many thousands of ranchers across the Nation who contribute to the economic 

well-being of every State; 

Whereas millions of fans watch professional and working 

ranch rodeo events annually, and rodeo is one of the 

most-watched sports in the Nation; 

Whereas membership and participation in rodeo and other organizations that promote and encompass the livelihood of 

cowboys span every generation and transcend race and 

gender; 

Whereas the cowboy is a central figure in literature, film, and 

music and occupies a central place in the public imagination; 

Whereas the cowboy is an American icon; and 

Whereas the ongoing contributions made by cowboys and 

cowgirls to their communities should be recognized and 

encouraged: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates July 25, 2009, as ‘‘National Day 

3 of the American Cowboy’’; and 

4 (2) encourages the people of the United States 

5 to observe the day with appropriate ceremonies and 

6 activities. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
| (1)   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  DATE:      August 7, 2008 |  /s/ James E.      Rouse                  |
|---------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|
|                            | James      E. Rouse                            |
|                            | President      andChief      Executive Officer |

----