alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              JUL-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         238,504
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               242,824
<PP&E>                                         510,981
<DEPRECIATION>                                 371,070
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 542,735
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,887,137
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       282,939
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   542,735
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,196,401
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              22,703
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,196,401)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,196,401)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.22


 


ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT (Contracts)


 


This Assignment and Assumption
Agreement (this “Assignment”) is executed as of April 1, 2021, by Hillcour, Inc., a Florida corporation (the “Assignor”),
and Continental Benefits, LLC, a Florida limited liability company (the “Assignee”).


 


In consideration of the mutual
covenants herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties
agree as follows:


 


		1.	Assignment and Assumption. Assignor hereby transfers and assigns to Assignee any and all
right, title, and interest which Assignor may have in the contracts listed in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof (the “Contracts”).
By executing this agreement, Assignee hereby accepts and agrees to assume and perform all of the terms, covenants, and conditions of the
Contracts on the part of Assignor therein required to be performed, from and after the date hereof. Assignee will indemnify, defend and
hold Assignor harmless from and against any and all claims, losses, liabilities, damages, costs and expenses arising out of or relating
to the Contracts to the extent first arising on or after the date hereof.



 


		2.	Further Assurances. Assignor and Assignee agree to take all further actions and execute,
acknowledge, and deliver all further documents that are reasonably necessary or useful in carrying out the purposes hereof.



 


		3.	Counterparts; Governing Law; Successors and Assigns; Authority. This Assignment may be executed
in any number of counterparts (including PDF and facsimile signatures), and each counterpart hereof shall be deemed to be an original
instrument, but all such counterparts shall constitute but one instrument. This Assignment shall be construed and enforced in accordance
with and governed by the internal laws of the State of Florida. This Assignment shall bind and inure to the benefit of Assignor and Assignee
and their respective successors and assigns.



 


[Signature page follows]


 






     


     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
this Assignment has been duly signed and sealed by the parties as of the date set forth above.


 


	 	ASSIGNOR
	 	 
	 	Hillcour,
    Inc.
	 	 
	 	By:	/s/
    Philip G. Mowry
	 	Name: 	Philip
    G. Mowry
	 	Title:	Authorized
    Representative
	 	 
	 	ASSIGNEE
	 	 
	 	Continental
    Benefits, LLC
	 	 
	 	By:	/s/
    Betsy Knorr
	 	Name:	Betsy
    Knorr
	 	Title:	Manager




 






     


     


    

 


Exhibit A


 


Contracts


 


		a.	Subscription, dated August 1, 2020, between Assignor and JazzHR



 


		b.	HireSelect Essential Subscription, dated November 9, 2020, between Assignor and Criteria Corp.



 


		c.	Subscription Agreement, dated April 2019, between Assignor and Neovation Corporation (SmarterU)



 


		d.	Loyalty Agreement dated January 4, 2018, by and between Assignor and Kim Buck which will be assigned to
Continental Benefits, LLC prior to Closing.



 


		e.	Loyalty Agreement dated January 4, 2018, by and between Assignor and Judy Felhaber which will be assigned
to Continental Benefits, LLC prior to Closing.
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 21-3382

___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v. Richard Harris Bear Runner lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of South Dakota - Western

____________ Submitted: April 15, 2022 Filed: June 13, 2022 [Unpublished]

____________ Before COLLOTON, MELLOY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. A jury convicted Richard Harris Bear Runner of Assault Resulting in Serious Bodily Injury and Assault with a Dangerous Weapon. He was sentenced to 57 months’ imprisonment to be followed by 3 years’ supervised release. He has since been subject to revocation five times due to failures to comply with the terms of supervised release. He presently appeals his fifth revocation sentence: a within-the-Guidelines-range sentence of 9 months’ incarceration and 1 year of additional

supervised release. Mr. Bear Runner identifies no procedural error, appealing only the substantive reasonableness of his revocation sentence. He argues specifically that his revocation sentence is too harsh given the fact that his violation was a Grade C violation based on a failure to participate in court-ordered cognitive-behavior training. He also argues the district court 1 erred by not properly weighing mitigating circumstances such as COVID-19 disruptions and the death of his father. We review the substantive reasonableness of a revocation sentence for abuse of discretion, affording broad discretion to the district court for reasons well illustrated in the present case. See United States v. DeMarrias, 895 F.3d 570, 572–74 (8th Cir. 2018). Here, the experienced district court judge possessed extensive knowledge of Mr. Bear Runner’s case, the nature of his supervised release violation, and the role of cognitive-behavior training in relation to the permissible goals of sentencing. The same judge had imposed Mr. Bear Runner’s initial sentence and previously had revoked his supervised release. The district court emphasized the need for supervised release and training to address potential domestic violence —behavior the district court described as similar to the underlying offense. Because there was no failure to consider important factors, no consideration of impermissible factors, and no clear error of judgment, we find no abuse of discretion. See United States v. Moore, 565 F.3d 435, 438 (8th Cir. 2009). We affirm the judgment of the district court.

______________________________

1 The Honorable Karen E. Schreier, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota. -2-
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This  schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted  from
     LONGHORN, INC. September 30, 1999  financial  statements and  is
     qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                         0000819818
<NAME>                        LONGHORN, INC.


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999

<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999

<CASH>                                                   0
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                          (1,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             0
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          0
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                             0
<EPS-BASIC>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0



</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

IN RE: FORTIETH STATEWIDE

INVESTIGATING GRAND JURY

PETITION OF: B.K. :

:

:

:

: No. 94 WM 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW

, this 14th day of December , 2018, i n consideration of the Petition for

Review, the temporary redaction of Petitioner’s name and other identifying information

from Report 1 of the Fortieth Statewide Investigating Grand Jury is made permanent. See

In re Fortieth Statewide Investigating Grand Jury , 190 A.3d 560 (Pa. 2018); In re Fortieth

Statewide Investigating Grand Jury , 2018 WL _________ (Pa. Dec. 3, 2018).

The Application to File under Seal is GRANTED. The Motion to Unseal and the

Application to Lift Stay are DENIED. The Application for Stay is DISMISSED AS MOOT.

Jurisdiction is relinquished.

The instant order is unsealed.
# C_2022463EN.01005601.xml

| 5.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 463/56 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 463/56

---

Action brought on 10 October 2022 — Topper Argentina v EUIPO — Ningbo Xiangxinli Network Technology (wetoper)

(Case T-630/22)

(2022/C 463/82)

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Topper Argentina, SA (Buenos Aires, Argentina) (represented by: J. M. Mora Cortés, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Ningbo Xiangxinli Network Technology Co. Ltd (Qingdao, China)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for EU word mark wetoper — EU trade mark No 18 249 968

Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 June 2022 in Case R 2126/2021-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO and the intervener (if it enters an appearance and intervenes in these proceedings) to pay the costs, including those incurred in the proceedings before the Operations Department and before the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and the intervener (if it enters an appearance and intervenes in these proceedings) to pay the costs, including those incurred in the proceedings before the Operations Department and before the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO.

Plea in law

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
Table 1. U.S. Biofuels operable production capacity 

million gallons per year

Period Fuel Ethanol Biodiesel

Renewable Diesel and 

Other Biofuels1

2021

January 17,510 2,394 791 

February 17,455 2,394 791 

March 17,376 2,410 791 

April 17,396 2,410 971 

May 17,396 2,428 971 

June 17,393 2,428 911 

July 17,393 2,430 911 

August 17,393 2,430 911 

September 17,393 2,462 911 

October 17,393 2,461 1,014 

November 17,428 2,389 1,017 

December 17,385 2,244 1,106 

2022

January 17,399 2,245 1,468

February 17,423 2,232 1,468 

March 17,323 2,231 1,468 

April 17,340 2,217 1,922 

May 17,318 2,215 1,922 

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-819 "Monthly Report of Biofuels, Fuels from Non-Biogenic Wastes, 

Fuel Oxygenates, Isooctane, and Isooctene"

1

Other biofuels include renewable heating oil, renewable jet fuel, renewable naphtha, renewable gasoline, and other biofuels 

and biointermediates.

U.S. Energy Information Administration | Monthly Biofuels Capacity and Feedstocks Update
# table9
**Exhibit10.8**

 

PROMISSORY NOTE

 
| $130,582.75 |   | February 2, 2004 |
|-------------|--------|-----------------------|

 

FOR VALUEDRECEIVED, and legally bound hereby, INNSUITES HOSPITALITY TRUST (“Maker”), anOhio real estate investment trust, having an office at 1615 East NorthernAvenue, Suite 102, Phoenix, Arizona 85020 hereby promises to pay to ChristopherWirth (“Note Holder”) or order and address as specified below the principal sumof ONE HUNDRED THIRTY THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED EIGHTY TWO AND 75/100 DOLLARS($130,582.75), with interest on the unpaid principal balance thereon from timeto time outstanding, at the rate of seven percent (7.00%) per annum, computedon a three hundred sixty (360)-day year, to be due and payable in installmentsof principal and interest as follows:

 

(A)                              $130,582.75amortized over 84 months at 7% interest ($1,970.84/month). This Note isnon-recourse secured by 58,259 RRF Limited Partnership Class B units. Monthlyinstallments of principal and interest to begin on March 2, 2004.

 

(B)                                Paymentsto be made payable to:

ChristopherWirth or Rare Earth Financial LLC

InnSuitesHotel Centre Suite 102

1615E. Northern Avenue,

Phoenix,AZ 85020

 

The 58,259 RRF LimitedPartnership Class B units will remain as security for the unpaid balance on theNote. Payments made under this note shall be subject to any current bank ormortgage covenants.

 

At the option ofthe Note Holder, late charges upon written notice are assessed as follows:

10 days late, $50 penalty

35 days late, $150 penalty

Over 35 days late, Note Holder could declare the note in default andcall the entire amount due.

Should default be declared, units proportionate to unpaid balance willbe returned to Note Holder.

 

Principal andinterest payable in lawful money of the United States.

 

If legalproceedings are entered into to recover on this Note, the undersigned agree(s)to pay such sum as the Court may fix as attorney’s fees.

 

The Makers andendorsers hereof severally waive diligence, demand, presentment for payment andprotest, and consent to the extension or time of payment of this Note withoutnotice.

 

 

INNSUITESHOSPITALITY TRUST,

an Ohio real estateinvestment trust

 

 
|   | By:    | /s/ Marc Berg |                            |
|--------|--------|---------------|---------------------------------|
|   |   |          | Name: Marc E. Berg              |
|   |   |          | Title: Secretary and  Treasurer |
|        |        |               |                                 |  |

 

----
Bar Docket No. 12823

#### In the Matter of Robert M. Telthorst, *Respondent.*

(290 P.3d 611)

Dated this 19th day of December, 2012.

In a letter received by the Clerk of the Appellate Courts on December 11, 2012, respondent Robert M. Telthorst, an attorney admitted to the practice of law in the state of Kansas, voluntarily surrendered his license to practice law in Kansas, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 217 (2011 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 371) as amended December 1, 2012.

On October 21, 2011, the respondent was temporarily suspended from the practice of law pending the outcome of disciplinary proceedings against him. On November 14, 2012, the respondent pleaded guilty to two felonies in the United States District Court for the District of Kansas. The crimes to which the respondent pleaded guilty were 18 U.S.C. § 1343 (2006), wire fraud, and 18 U.S.C. § 1956 (2006), money laundering.

This court, having examined the files of the office of the Disciplinary Administrator, finds the surrender of the respondent’s license should be accepted and that the respondent should be disbarred.

It Is Therefore Ordered that Robert M. Telthorst be and he is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in Kansas, and his license and privilege to practice law are hereby revoked.

It Is Further Ordered that the Clerk of the Appellate Courts strike the name of Robert M. Telthorst from the roll of attorneys licensed to practice law in Kansas.

It Is Further Ordered that this order shall be published in the Kansas Reports, that the costs herein shall be assessed to the respondent, and that the respondent forthwith shall comply with Supreme Court Rule 218 (2011 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 379) amended December 1, 2012.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          28,203
<SECURITIES>                                    13,384
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,806
<ALLOWANCES>                                       457
<INVENTORY>                                     22,023
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                88,789
<PP&E>                                          73,992
<DEPRECIATION>                                  34,375
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 129,305
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,464
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        25,608
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   129,305
<SALES>                                        144,355
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               144,355
<CGS>                                           78,411
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   78,411
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 589
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,337
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,883
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             13,454
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,454
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .83
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .83
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE MARCH
31, 2000 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           9,368
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,368
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 270,366
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,796,894
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       149,961
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,716,427)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   270,368
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               520,688
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,850
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (545,538)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (545,508)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 27,178
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (518,360)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
No. 12-5347.

#### Williams *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-4320
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JOHN WESLEY FAIRCLOTH, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CR-95-72) Submitted: January 15, 1998 Decided: January 27, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Wesley Faircloth, Appellant Pro Se. Christine Witcover Dean, Assistant United S tates Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his motion to stay forfeiture proceedings. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Faircloth , No. CR-95-72 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 2, 1997). Additionally, we deny the Appellee's motions to dismiss the appeal and to stay the briefing schedule. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED