### InThe Matter Of: 

## SERVED: June 

## 27, 2016 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION:.·.,, OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, DC

DocketNo. FAA-2014-0320 GLOBAL ARMS AND AMMUNITION ) ) ) ) ) 

### CaseNo. 2012NM710034 Respondent
ORDERSETTING A RULE 16LITIGATION SCHEDULING CONFERENCE, AND DIRECTING THE PARTIES TO

CONFERAND FILEA RULE 26(f) PROPOSEDDISCOVERYPLAN 1) Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference: 'i**-~**



### Pursuantto 14 C.F.R. § 13.205 and Civ. R. 16, the parties shall appearby telephone on 

### Thursday, September8, 2016, 

### at 10:00 

### a.m. Easterntime for a Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference. Duringthis Conference the parties will discuss the issues inthe dispute, their jointly submittedproposed scheduling/discoveryplan (see paragraph 2 

### infra) andrespond to any questions regarding disagreements not resolved in

### the proposedplan. During the Conference a final scheduling/discovery plan will be ruled upon, as well as any otherrelatedmatterspursuant to Rule 16(c). Theparties shall access the Conference by dialing 888-278-0296, and when**prompted~** 

### entering access code 5851842. 2) Parties' Rule 26(f) Planning. Meeting and Submission of Proposed Discovery Plan: Pursuantto 14 C.F.R. 

### § 13.205(a)(6) and Civ. R. 

### 26(f),priorto convening withthe Judge for the Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference, the parties shall privately conduct a Rule 26(f) planning meeting andprepare ajointlywrittenproposed scheduling/discovery plan, whichmust be completed and filed withtheundersigned Judge 

### on orbefore Thursday, September 1,2016 (i.e. at least seven (7) calendar days beforethe Conference).The parties' Rule 26(±) planning meeting shall include a good faith discussion about the nature and basis ofeach party's claims, the possibility ofresolving all or part ofthe case, the scope and type ofdiscovery (including electronic discovery) and the place ofvenue for hearing. During this meeting, the parties shall discuss matters identified in 14 C.F.R. 

### § 13.217 and Rule 26(f)(2) and (3) as part ofdeveloping their proposed scheduling/discovery plan. The parties' planning meeting should also include discussion about the sequence and timing offollow-up discovery, including whether that discovery should be conducted in phases to prepare for any filing ofparticular motions (e.g., limiting scope oftrial, dispositive motions, etc.). The proposed discovery deadlines in the parties' proposed scheduling/discovery plan

. should be mutually agreeable, with a view to achieving case resolution with a minimum of

expense and delay. Any unresolved scheduling/discovery disputes should be clearly identified in the proposed plan, so that these disputes may be addressed by the Judge during the Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference. 3) Filing and Serving Documents·: Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.21 l(a), a copy ofany document a party files with the Federal Aviation Administration Hearing Docket ("Hearing Docket") must also be separately filed with the undersigned, and served upon the opposing party. 4) Compliance with Court-Ordered Deadline Dates: Whenever the Judge orders the parties to file documents by a specific deadline date (see, e.g., paragraph 2 above) such deadline date is the date by which the documents must be datestamped received at the Office ofHearings. To ensure compliance with this and any future Orders setting deadlines, the parties are encouraged to fax orpersonally deliver a copy oftheir documents to the Office ofHearings (Fax: 202-366-7536), on or before the deadline date. Failure ofa party to timely file documents by the court-ordered deadline could lead to the party's position not being considered.

Page 2 of 35) Conflicts with the Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference Date: Ifa party has an unavoidable conflict with the Scheduled Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference set in paragraph 1

### supra, and wishes to modify the date/time ofthe scheduled Conference, the party shall first confer with opposing counsel about mutually agreeable alternate dates, and then contact Mrs. Rachael Brown, Judicial StaffAssistant, at the Office of Hearings (202-366-2132) as soon as possible after the receipt ofthis Order, with at least three (3) mutually-agreed, proposed alternate dates/times for the Judge's consideration.

U.S. Administrative Law Judge

Attachment: Service List

Page 3 of 3DocketNo. FAA-2014-0320 (Civil Penalty Action) 

### SERVICE LIST - BY U.S. 

### MAIL ORIGINAL & 

### ONE COPY
Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000 1

Mr. Kyle Lomazow 

### Complainant's Counsel Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 Federal Aviation Administration 1601 Lind Ave., S.W. Renton, WA 98057 TEL: 425-227-1847 FAX: 425-227-1007 Mr. Vincent Williams 

### Respondent's Lay Representative Global Arms and Ammunition 801 211d Avenue, Suite #822 Seattle, WA 98104 TEL: 206-366-5279 Judge J.E. Sullivan 

### US. Administrative 

### Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (El 1-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL:**202-366~6941** FAX: 202-366-7536 

### ONE COPY

Mr. David Carl Williams, President Global Arms and Ammunition, 

### Respondent 28 -3i11 Street N.E., Suite A Auburn, WA 98002 TEL: 206-325-9400

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W I000, Washington,

.DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.