## I NDIANA 

## D EPARTMENT OF 

## E NVIRONMENTAL 

## M ANAGEMENT

We Protect Hoosiers and Our Environment.

Mitchell E. Daniels Jr. 100 North Senate Avenue

Governor Indianapolis, Indiana 46204 (317) 232-8603 Thomas W. Easterly Toll Free (800) 451-6027

Commissioner www.idem.IN.gov

Recycled Paper An Equal Opportunity Employer Please Recycle TO: Interested Parties / Applicant

DATE: March 10, 2011

RE: KYB Manufacturing North America / 081-30224-00015

FROM: Matthew Stuckey, Branch Chief Permits Branch Office of Air Quality



## Notice of Decision – Approval

Please be advised that on behalf of the Commissioner of the Department of Environmental Management, I have issued a decision regarding the enclosed matter. Pursuant to 326 IAC 2, this approval was effective immediately upon submittal of the application.

If you wish to challenge this decision, IC 4-21.5-3-7 requires that you file a petition for administrative review. This petition may include a request for stay of effectiveness and must be submitted to the Office of Environmental Adjudication, 100 North Senate Avenue, Government Center North, Suite N 501E, Indianapolis, IN 46204, within eighteen (18) calendar days from the mailing of this notice . The filing of a petition for administrative review is complete on the earliest of the following dates that apply to the filing: (1) the date the document is delivered to the Office of Environmental Adjudication (OEA); (2) the date of the postmark on the envelope contai ning the document, if the document is mailed to OEA by U.S. mail; or (3) The date on which the document is deposited with a private carrier, as shown by receipt issued by the carrier, if the document is sent to the OEA by private carrier.

The petition must include facts demonstrating that you are either the applicant, a person aggrieved or adversely affected by the decision or otherwise entitled to review by law. Please identify the permit, decision, or other order for which you seek review by permit number, name of the applicant, location, date of this notice and all of the following: (1) the name and address of the person making the request; (2) the interest of the person making the request; (3) identification of any persons repres ented by the person making the request; (4) the reasons, with particularity, for the request; (5) the issues, with particularity, proposed for considerations at any hearing; and (6) identification of the terms and conditions wh ich, in the judgment of the person making the request, would be appropriate in the case in question to satisfy the requirements of the law governing documents of the type issued by the Commissioner.

If you have technical questions regarding the enclos ed documents, please contact the Office of Air Quality, Permits Branch at (317) 233-0178. Calle rs from within Indiana may call toll-free at 1-800-451- 6027, ext. 3-0178.

Enclosures FNPER-AM.dot12/3/07KYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Page 2 of 21 Franklin , Indiana Notice

- O nly Change No. 081

- 30224

- 00015 Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley

and the "Permits B ranch" have been changed to "Permit Administration and Support Section". References to "Asbestos Section", "Compliance Data Section", "Air Compliance Section", and "Compliance Branch" have been changed to "Compliance and Enforcement Branch

.

2. Section A .1 of the permit and the reporting forms have been revised to remove all references to the source mailing address. IDEM, OAQ will continue to maintain records of the mailing address.

3

. For clarity, IDEM has changed references to the general conditions: “in accordance with Section B”, in accordance with Section C”, or other similar language to "Section C...contains the Permittee’s obligations with regard to the records required by this condition.”

4

. IDEM has decided that the phrases “no later than” and “not later than” are clearer than “within” in relation to the end of a timeline. Therefore all timelines have been switched to “no later than” or “not later than” except when the underlying rule states “within.”

5

. IDEM has determined that rather than h aving a certification condition and various references throughout the permit as to whether a particular report, notice, or correspondence needs to include a certification, the specific conditions that require an affirmation of truth and completeness shall state so. The certification condition has been removed. All statements to whether a certification, pursuant to the former Section B

- Certification, is needed or not have been removed. Section B

- Credible Evidence and Section C

- Asbestos Abatement Pro jects still require certification as the underlying rules also require certifications.

6

. IDEM has decided to clarify the requirements of Section B

– Preventive Maintenance Plan and to add a new paragraph (b) to handle a future situation where the Permi ttee adds units that need preventive maintenance plans.

7

. IDEM has revised the language of the Section B

- Preventive Maintenance Plan, S ection C

- General Record Keeping, and Section C

- General Reporting to allow the Permittee to not have to begin imp lementing the requirements of these conditions until ninety day after initial start up.

8

. IDEM has revised the language of the Section B

- Permit Renewal and Section B

- Termination of Right to Operate to change the MSOP renewal application due date to o ne hundred twenty (120) prior to expiration of the current permit in order to match the rule.

9

. IDEM has revised Section B

- Permit Renewal paragraph (c) to state which rule establishes the authority to set a deadline for the Permittee to submit addition al information.

1 0

. IDEM has added 326 IAC 5

- 1

- 1 to the exception clause of Section C

- Opacity, since 326 IAC 5

- 1

- 1 does list exceptions.

1 1

. IDEM has revised Section C

- Incineration to more closely reflect the two underlying rules.

1 2

. IDEM has revis ed the language of the Section C

- Asbestos Abatement Projects to change the terminology "Accredited" to "Licensed" in order to match the rule.

1 3

. IDEM has removed the first paragraph of Section C

- Performance Testing as due to the fact that specific te sting conditions elsewhere in the permit will specify the timeline and procedures.

1 4

. IDEM has removed Section C

- Monitoring Methods. The conditions that require the monitoring or testing, if required, state what methods shall be used.

1 5

. IDEM has re vised Section C

- Response to Excursions or Exceedances. The introduction sentence has been added to clarify that it is only when an excursion or exceedance is detected that the requirements of this condition need to be followed. The word "excess" was ad ded to the last sentence of paragraph (a) because the Permittee only has to minimize excess emissions.KYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Page 3 of 21 Franklin , Indiana Notice

- O nly Change No. 081

- 30224

- 00015 Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley

The middle of paragraph (b) has been deleted as it was duplicative of paragraph (a). The phrase "or are returning" was added to subparagraph (b)(2) as this is an acceptable response assuming the operation or emission unit does return to normal or its usual manner of operation. The phrase "within the indicator range, designated condition, or below the applicable emission limitation or standard, as applic able" was replaced with "normal or usual manner of operation" because the first phrase is just a limited list of the second phrase. The recordkeeping required by paragraph (e) was changed to require only records of the response because the previously list ed items are required to be recorded elsewhere in the permit.

1 6

. IDEM has revised Section C

- Actions Related to Noncompliance Demonstrated by a Stack Test. The requirements to take response steps and minimize excess emissions have been removed because Section C

- Response to Excursions or Exceedances already requires response steps related to exceedances and excess emissions minimization. The start of the timelines was switched from "the receipt of the test results" to "the date of the test." There wa s confusion if the "receipt" was by IDEM, the Permittee, or someone else. Since the start of the timelines has been moved up, the length of the timelines was increased. The new timelines require action within a comparable timeline; and the new timelines still ensure that the Permittee will return to compliance within a reasonable timeframe.

1 7

. The voice of paragraph (b) of Section C

- General Record Keeping Requirements has been changed to clearly indicate that it is the Permittee that must follow the r equirements of the paragraph.

1 8

. The portion of D.1 that pertain to 40 CFR 63, Subpart N, were moved to a separate section E.1.

19

. The Minor Source Operating Permit (MSOP) Certification fo r m at the end of the reporting forms has been removed from the p ermit.

The permit has been revised as follows with deleted language as strikeouts and new language bolded :

SECTION B GENERAL CONDITIONS

B.1 Definitions [326 IAC 2

- 1.1

- 1] Terms in this permit shall have the definition assigned to such terms in the referenced regulation. In the absence of definitions in the referenced regulation, the applicable definitions found in the statutes or regulations (IC 13

- 11, 32 6 IAC 1

- 2 and 326 IAC 2

- 1.1

- 1 ) shall prevail.

B.2 Permit Term [326 IAC 2

- 6.1

- 7(a)][326 IAC 2

- 1.1

- 9.5][IC 13

- 15

- 3

- 6(a)] (a) This permit, M081

- 23686

- 00015

, is issued for a fixed term of ten (10) years from the issuance date of this permit, as determined in accordance with IC 4

- 21.5

- 3

- 5(f) and IC 13

- 15

- 5

- 3. Subsequent revisions, modifications, or amendments of this permit do not affect the expiration date of thi s permit. (b) If IDEM, OAQ, upon receiving a timely and complete renewal permit application, fails to issue or deny the permit renewal prior to the expiration date of this permit, this existing permit shall not expire and all terms and conditions shall con tinue in effect, until the renewal permit has been issued or denied.

B.3 Term of Conditions [326 IAC 2

- 1.1

- 9.5] Notwithstanding the permit term of a permit to construct, a permit to operat e, or a permit modification, any condition established in a permit issued pursuant to a permitting program approved in the state implementation plan shall remain in effect until:

(a) the condition is modified in a subsequent permit action pursuant to Tit le I of the Clean Air Act; or (b) the emission unit to which the condition pertains permanently ceases operation.KYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Page 4 of 21 Franklin , Indiana Notice

- O nly Change No. 081

- 30224

- 00015 Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley

B.4 Enforceability Unless otherwise stated, all terms and conditions in this permit, including an y provisions designed to limit the source's potential to emit, are enforceable by IDEM, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) and by citizens in accordance with the Clean Air Act.

B.5 Severability The provisions of this permit are severable; a determination that any portion of this permit is invalid shall not affect the validity of the remainder of the permit.

B.6 Property Rights or Exclusive Privilege This permit does not convey any property rights of any sort or any exclusive privilege.

B.7 Duty to Provide Information (a) The Permittee shall furnish to IDEM, OAQ, wi thin a reasonable time, any information that IDEM, OAQ may request in writing to determine whether cause exists for modifying, revoking and reissuing, or terminating this permit, or to determine compliance with this permit. The submittal by the Permittee does require the certification by an "authorized individual" as defined by 326 IAC 2

- 1.1

- 1(1) . Upon request, the Permittee shall also furnish to IDEM, OAQ copies of records required to be kept by this permit.

(b) For information furnished by the Permitte e to IDEM, OAQ, the Permittee may include a claim of confidentiality in accordance with 326 IAC 17.1. When furnishing copies of requested records directly to U. S. EPA, the Permittee may assert a claim of confidentiality in accordance with 40 CFR 2, Subpa rt B.

B.8 Certification (a) Where specifically designated by this permit or required by an applicable requirement, any application form, report, or compliance certification submitted shall contain certification b y an "authorized individual" of truth, accuracy, and completeness. This certification shall state that, based on information and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, the statements and information in the document are true, accurate, and complete.

(b) One (1) certification shall be included, using the attached Certification Form, with each submittal requiring certification. One (1) certification may cover multiple forms in one (1) submittal.

(c) An "authorized individual" is defined at 326 IAC 2

- 1.1

- 1(1)

.

B.9 Annual Notification [326 IAC 2

- 6.1

- 5(a)(5)] (a) An annual notification shall be submitted by an authorized individual to the Office of Air Quality stating whether or not the source is in operation and in compliance with the terms and conditions contained in this permit.

(b) The annual notice shall be submitted in the format attached no later than March 1 of each year to:

Indiana Department of Environmental Management Compl iance Branch, Office of Air Quality 100 North Senate Avenue MC 61

- 53 IGCN 1003 Indianapolis, IN 46204

- 2251

(c) The notification shall be considered timely if the date postmarked on the envelope or certified mail receipt, or affixed by the shipper on the p rivate shipping receipt, is on orKYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Page 5 of 21 Franklin , Indiana Notice

- O nly Change No. 081

- 30224

- 00015 Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley

before the date it is due. If the document is submitted by any other means, it shall be considered timely if received by IDEM, OAQ on or before the date it is due.

B.10 Preventive Maintenance Plan [326 IAC 1

- 6

- 3] (a) If required by specific condition(s) in Section D of this permit, the Permittee shall maintain and implement Preventive Maintenance Plans (PMPs) including the following information

on ea ch facility:

(1) Identification of the individual(s) responsible for inspecting, maintaining, and repairing emission control devices; (2) A description of the items or conditions that will be inspected and the inspection schedule for said items or conditi ons; and (3) Identification and quantification of the replacement parts that will be maintained in inventory for quick replacement.

(b) A copy of the PMPs shall be submitted to IDEM, OAQ upon request and within a reasonable time, and shall be subject to r eview and approval by IDEM, OAQ. IDEM, OAQ may require the Permittee to revise its PMPs whenever lack of proper maintenance causes or is the primary contributor to an exceedance of any limitation on emissions or potential to emit. The PMPs do not require the certification by an "authorized individual" as defined by 326 IAC 2

- 1.1

- 1(1)

.
(c) To the extent the Permittee is required by 40 CFR Part 60/63 to have an Operation Maintenance, and Monitoring (OMM) Plan for a unit, such Plan is deemed to satisfy the PMP requirements of 326 IAC 1

- 6

- 3 for that unit.

B.11 Prior Permits Superseded [326 IAC 2

- 1.1

- 9.5] (a) All terms and conditions of permits established prior to M081

- 23686

- 00015 an d issued pursuant to permitting programs approved into the state implementation plan have been either:

(1) incorporated as originally stated,

(3) (2) revised, or deleted.

(b) All previous registrations and permits are superseded by this permit.

B.12 Termina tion of Right to Operate [326 IAC 2

- 6.1

- 7(a)] The Permittee's right to operate this source terminates with the expiration of this permit unless a timely and complete renewal application is submitted at least ninety (90) days prior to the date of expiration of the source’s existing permit, consistent with 326 IAC 2

- 6.1

- 7

.

B.13 Permit Renewal [326 IAC 2

- 6.1

- 7] (a) The application for renewal shall be submitted using the application form or forms prescribed by IDEM, OAQ and shall include the information specified in 326 IAC 2

- 6.1

- 7

. Such information shall be included in the application for each emission unit at this source. The renewal application does require the certification by an "authorized individual" as defined by 326 IAC 2

- 1.1

- 1(1)

.
Request for renewal shall be submitted to:

Indiana Department of Environmental Management Permits Branch, Office of Air Quali ty 100 North Senate AvenueKYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Page 6 of 21 Franklin , Indiana Notice

- O nly Change No. 081

- 30224

- 00015 Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley

MC 61

- 53 IGCN 1003 Indianapolis, Indiana 46204

- 2251

(b) A timely renewal application is one that is: (1) Submitted at least ninety (90) days prior to the date of the expiration of this permit; and (2) If the date postmarked on the envelope or certified mail receipt, or affixed by the shipper on the private shipping receipt, is on or before the date it is due. If the document is submitted by any other means, it shall be considered timely if received by IDEM, OAQ on or before the date it is due.

(c) If the Permittee submits a timely and complete application for renewal of this permit, the source’s failure to have a permit is not a violation of 326 IAC 2

- 6.1 until IDEM, OAQ takes final action on the renewal application, except tha t this protection shall cease to apply if, subsequent to the completeness determination, the Permittee fails to submit by the deadline specified in writing by IDEM, OAQ any additional information identified as being needed to process the application. B.14 Permit Amendment or Revision [326 IAC 2

- 5.1

- 3(e)(3)][326 IAC 2

- 6.1

- 6] (a) Permit amendments and revisions are governed by the requirements of 326 IAC 2

- 6.1

- 6 whenever the Permittee seeks to amend or modify this permit. (b) Any application requesting an amendment or modification of this permit shall be submitted to:

Indiana Department of Environmental Management Permits Branch, Office of Air Quality 100 North Senate Avenue MC 61

- 53 IGCN 1003 Indianapolis, Indiana 46204

- 2251

Any such application shall be certified by an "authorized individual" as defined by
326 IAC 2

- 1.1

- 1(1)

. (c) The Permittee shall notify the OAQ within thirty (30) calendar days of implemen ting a notice

- only change. [326 IAC 2

- 6.1

- 6(d)]

B.15 Source Modification Requirement A modification, construction, or reconstruction is governed by the requirements of 326 IAC 2.

B.16 Inspecti on and Entry [326 IAC 2

- 5.1

- 3(e)(4)(B)][326 IAC 2

- 6.1

- 5(a)(4)][IC 13

- 14

- 2

- 2][IC 13

- 17

- 3

- 2][IC 13

- 30

- 3

- 1] Upon pr esentation of proper identification cards, credentials, and other documents as may be required by law, and subject to the Permittee’s right under all applicable laws and regulations to assert that the information collected by the agency is confidential and entitled to be treated as such, the Permittee shall allow IDEM, OAQ, U.S. EPA, or an authorized representative to perform the following:

(a) Enter upon the Permittee's premises where a permitted source is located, or emissions related activity is conduct ed, or where records must be kept under the conditions of this permit; (b) As authorized by the Clean Air Act, IC 13

- 14

- 2

- 2, IC 13

- 17

- 3

- 2, and IC 13

- 30

- 3

- 1, have access to and copy , at reasonable times, any records that must be kept under the conditions of this permit; (c) As authorized by the Clean Air Act, IC 13

- 14

- 2

- 2, IC 13

- 17

- 3

- 2, and IC 13

- 30

- 3

- 1, inspect

, at reasonable times, any facilities, equipment (including monitoring and air pollution control equipment), practices, or operations regulated or re quired under this permit;KYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Page 7 of 21 Franklin , Indiana Notice

- O nly Change No. 081

- 30224

- 00015 Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley

(d) As authorized by the Clean Air Act, IC 13

- 14

- 2

- 2, IC 13

- 17

- 3

- 2, and IC 13

- 30

- 3

- 1, sample or monitor , at reasonable times, substances or parameters for the purpose of assuring compliance with this permit or applicable requirem ents; and (e) As authorized by the Clean Air Act, IC 13

- 14

- 2

- 2, IC 13

- 17

- 3

- 2, and IC 13

- 30

- 3

- 1, utilize any photographic, recording, testing, monitoring, or other equipment for the purpose of assuring compliance with this permit or applicable requirements.

B.17 Transfer of Ownership or Operational Control [326 IAC 2

- 6.1

- 6] (a) The Permittee must comply with the requirements of 326 IAC 2

- 6.1

- 6 whenever the Permittee seeks to change the ownership or operational control of the source and no other change in the permit is necessary.

(b) Any application requesting a change in the ownership or operational control of the source shall contain a written agreement containing a specific date for transfer of permit responsibility, coverage and liability between the current and new Permittee. The application shall be submitted to:

Indiana Department of Environmental Management Permits Branch, Office of Air Quality 100 North Sena te Avenue MC 61

- 53 IGCN 1003 Indianapolis, Indiana 46204

- 2251

The application which shall be submitted by the Permittee does require the certification by an "authorized individual" as defined by 326 IAC 2

- 1.1

- 1(1)

.
(c) The Permittee may implement notice

- only changes addressed in the request for a notice

only change immediately upon submittal of the request. [326 IAC 2

- 6.1

- 6(d)(3)]

B.18 Annual Fee Payment [326 IAC 2

- 1.1

- 7] (a) The Permitte e shall pay annual fees to IDEM, OAQ within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of a billing.

(b) The Permittee may call the following telephone numbers: 1

- 800

- 451

- 6027 or 317

- 233

- 4230 (ask for OAQ, Billing, Licensing, and Training Section), to determi ne the appropriate permit fee.

B.19 Credible Evidence [326 IAC 1

- 1

- 6] For the purpose of submitting compliance certifications or establishing whether or not the Permittee has violated or is i n violation of any condition of this permit, nothing in this permit shall preclude the use, including the exclusive use, of any credible evidence or information relevant to whether the Permittee would have been in compliance with the condition of this perm it if the appropriate performance or compliance test or procedure had been performed.

SECTION C SOURCE OPERATION CONDITIONS

Entire Source Emission Limitations and Standards [326 IAC 2

- 6.1

- 5(a)(1)]

C.1 Particulate Emission Limitations For Processes with Process Weight Rates Less Than One Hundred (100) Pounds per Hour [326 IAC 6

- 3

- 2]
Pursuant to 326 IAC 6

- 3

- 2(e)(2), particulate emissions from any process not exempt under
326 IAC 6

- 3

- 1(b) or (c) which has a maximu m process weight rate less than 100 pounds per hourKYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Page 8 of 21 Franklin , Indiana Notice

- O nly Change No. 081

- 30224

- 00015 Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley

and the methods in 326 IAC 6

- 3

- 2(b) through (d) do not apply shall not exceed 0.551 pounds per hour.

C.2 Permit Revocation [326 IAC 2

- 1.1

- 9]
Pursuant to 326 IAC 2

- 1.1

- 9 (Revocation of Permits), this permit to operate may be revoked for any of the following causes:

(a) Violation of any conditions of this permit. (b) Failure to disclose all the relevant facts, or misrepresentation in obtainin g this permit. (c) Changes in regulatory requirements that mandate either a temporary or permanent reduction of discharge of contaminants. However, the amendment of appropriate sections of this permit shall not require revocation of this permit. (d) Nonco mpliance with orders issued pursuant to 326 IAC 1

- 5 (Episode Alert Levels) to reduce emissions during an air pollution episode. (e) For any cause which establishes in the judgment of IDEM, the fact that continuance of this permit is not consistent with pur poses of this article.

C.3 Opacity [326 IAC 5

- 1]
Pursuant to 326 IAC 5

- 1

- 2 (Opacity Limitations), except as provided in 326 IAC 5

- 1

- 3 (Temporary Alternative Opacity Limitations), opacity shall meet the following, unless otherwise stated in this permit:

(a) Opacity shall not exceed an average of forty percent (40%) in any one (1) six (6) minute averaging period as determined in 326 IAC 5

- 1

- 4. (b) Opacity shall not exceed sixty percent (60%) for more th an a cumulative total of fifteen (15) minutes (sixty (60) readings as measured according to 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 9 or fifteen (15) one (1) minute nonoverlapping integrated averages for a continuous opacity monitor) in a six (6) hour period.

C.4 O pen Burning [326 IAC 4

- 1] [IC 13

- 17

- 9] The Permittee shall not open burn any material except as provided in 326 IAC 4

- 1

- 3, 326 IAC 4

- 1

- 4 or 326 IAC 4

- 1

- 6. The previous sentence notwit hstanding, the Permittee may open burn in accordance with an open burning approval issued by the Commissioner under
326 IAC 4

- 1

- 4.1.

C.5 Incineration [326 IAC 4

- 2] [326 IAC 9

- 1

- 2] The Permittee shall not operate an incinerator or incinerate any waste or refuse except as provided in 326 IAC 4

- 2 and 326 IAC 9

- 1

- 2.

C.6 Fugitive Dust Emissions [326 IAC 6

- 4]
The Permitt ee shall not allow fugitive dust to escape beyond the property line or boundaries of the property, right

- of

- way, or easement on which the source is located, in a manner that would violate
326 IAC 6

- 4 (Fugitive Dust Emissions).

C.7 Asbestos Abatement Pr ojects [326 IAC 14

- 10] [326 IAC 18] [40 CFR 61, Subpart M] (a) Notification requirements apply to each owner or operator. If the combined amount of regulated asbestos containing material (RACM) to be stripped, removed or disturbed is at least 260 linear feet on pipes or 160 square feet on other facility components, or at least thirty

- five (35) cubic feet on all facility components, then the notific ation requirements of
326 IAC 14

- 10

- 3 are mandatory. All demolition projects require notification whether or not asbestos is present.

(b) The Permittee shall ensure that a written notification is sent on a form provided by the Commissioner at least ten ( 10) working days before asbestos stripping or removal workKYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Page 9 of 21 Franklin , Indiana Notice

- O nly Change No. 081

- 30224

- 00015 Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley

or before demolition begins, per 326 IAC 14

- 10

- 3, and shall update such notice as necessary, including, but not limited to the following:

(1) When the amount of affected asbestos containing materi al increases or decreases by at least twenty percent (20%); or (2) If there is a change in the following: (A) Asbestos removal or demolition start date; (B) Removal or demolition contractor; or (C) Waste disposal site.

(c) The Permittee shall ensure that the notice is postmarked or delivered according to the guidelines set forth in 326 IAC 14

- 10

- 3(2).

(d) The notice to be submitted shall include the information enumerated in
326 IAC 14

- 10

- 3(3).

All required notifications shall be submitted to:

Indiana D epartment of Environmental Management Asbestos Section, Office of Air Quality 100 North Senate Avenue MC 61

- 52 IGCN 1003 Indianapolis, Indiana 46204

- 2251

The notice shall include a signed certification from the owner or operator that the information provi ded in this notification is correct and that only Indiana licensed workers and project supervisors will be used to implement the asbestos removal project. The notifications do not require a certification by an "authorized individual" as defined by
326 IAC 2

- 1.1

- 1(1)

.
(e) Procedures for Asbestos Emission Control The Permittee shall comply with the applicable emission control procedures in
326 IAC 14

- 10

- 4 and 40 CFR 61.145(c). Per 326 IAC 14

- 10

- 1, emission control requirements are applicable for any remova l or disturbance of RACM greater than three (3) linear feet on pipes or three (3) square feet on any other facility components or a total of at least 0.75 cubic feet on all facility components.

(f) Demolition and Renovation The Permittee shall thoroughly inspect the affected facility or part of the facility where the demolition or renovation will occur for the presence of asbestos pursuant to
40 CFR 61.145(a).

(g) Indiana Accredited Asbestos Inspector The Permittee shall comply with 326 IAC 14

- 10

- 1(a) tha t requires the owner or operator, prior to a renovation/demolition, to use an Indiana Accredited Asbestos Inspector to thoroughly inspect the affected portion of the facility for the presence of asbestos. The requirement to use an Indiana Accredited Asbes tos inspector is not federally enforceable.

Testing Requirements [326 IAC 2

- 6.1

- 5(a)(2)]

C.8 Performance Testing [326 IAC 3

- 6] (a) All testing shall be performed according to the provisions of 326 IAC 3

- 6 (Source Sampling Procedures), except as provided elsewhere in this permit, utilizing any applicable procedures and analysis methods specified in 40 CFR 51, 40 CFR 60, 40 C FR 61, 40 CFR 63, 40 CFR 75, or other procedures approved by IDEM, OAQ.KYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Page 10 of 21 Franklin , Indiana Notice

- O nly Change No. 081

- 30224

- 00015 Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley

A test protocol, except as provided elsewhere in this permit, shall be submitted to:

Indiana Department of Environmental Management Compliance Data Section, Office of Air Quality
100 North Senate Avenue MC 61

- 53 IGCN 1003 Indianapolis, Indiana 46204

- 2251

no later than thirty

- five (35) days prior to the intended test date. The protocol submitted by the Permittee does not require certification by an "authorized individual" as defined by
326 IAC 2

- 1.1

- 1(1)

.
(b) The Permittee shall notify IDEM, OAQ of the actual test date at least fourteen (14) days prior to the actual test date. The notification submitted by the Permittee does not require certification by an "authorized individual" as defined by 326 IAC 2

- 1.1

- 1(1)

.
(c) Pursuant to 326 IAC 3

- 6

- 4(b), all test reports must be received by IDEM, OAQ not later than forty

- five (45) days after the completion of the testing. An extension may be granted by IDEM, OAQ if the Permittee submits to IDEM, OAQ, a reasonable written explanation not later than five (5) days prior to the end of the initial forty

- five (45) day period.

Compliance Requirements [326 IAC 2

- 1.1

- 11]

C.9 Compl iance Requirements [326 IAC 2

- 1.1

- 11] The commissioner may require stack testing, monitoring, or reporting at any time to assure compliance with all applicable requirements by issuing a n order under 326 IAC 2

- 1.1

- 11. Any monitoring or testing shall be performed in accordance with 326 IAC 3 or other methods approved by the commissioner or the U. S. EPA. Compliance Monitoring Requirements [326 IAC 2

- 6.1

- 5(a)(2)]

C.10 Compliance Monitoring [326 IAC 2

- 1.1

- 11] Compliance with applicable requirements shall be documented as required by this permit. The Permittee shall be responsible for installing any necessary equipment and initiating any required monitoring related to that equipment. All monitoring and record keeping requirements not already legally required shall be implemented when oper ation begins.

C.11 Monitoring Methods [326 IAC 3] [40 CFR 60] [40 CFR 63] Any monitoring or testing required by Section D of this permit shall be performed according t o the provisions of 326 IAC 3, 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, 40 CFR 60, Appendix B, 40 CFR 63, or other approved methods as specified in this permit.

C.12 Instrument Specifications [326 IAC 2

- 1.1

- 11] (a) When required by any condition of this permit, an analog instrument used to measure a parameter related to the operation of an air pollution control device shall have a scale such that the expected maximum reading for the normal range shal l be no less than twenty percent (20%) of full scale.

(b) The Permittee may request that the IDEM, OAQ approve the use of an instrument that does not meet the above specifications provided the Permittee can demonstrate that an alternative instrument specifica tion will adequately ensure compliance with permit conditions requiring the measurement of the parameters.

Corrective Actions and Response Steps

C.13 Response to Excursions or ExceedancesKYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Page 11 of 21 Franklin , Indiana Notice

- O nly Change No. 081

- 30224

- 00015 Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley

(a) Upon detecting an excursion or exceedance, the Permittee shall restore operation of the emissions unit (including any control device and associated capture system) to its normal

or usua l manner of operation as expeditiously as practicable in accordance with good air pollution control practices for minimizing emissions.

(b) The response shall include minimizing the period of any startup, shutdown or malfunction and taking any necessary c orrective actions to restore normal operation and prevent the likely recurrence of the cause of an excursion or exceedance (other than those caused by excused startup or shutdown conditions). Corrective actions may include, but are not limited to, the fol lowing:

(1) initial inspection and evaluation; (2) recording that operations returned to normal without operator action (such as through response by a computerized distribution control system); or (3) any necessary follow

- up actions to return operation to within the indicator range, designated condition, or below the applicable emission limitation or standard, as applicable.

(c) A determination of whether the Permittee has used acceptable procedures in response to an excursion or exceedance will be based on information available, which may include, but is not limited to, the following:

(1) monitoring results; (2) review of operation and maintenance procedures and records; and/or (3) inspection of the control device, associated capture system, and the pro cess.

(d) Failure to take reasonable response steps shall be considered a deviation from the permit.

(e) The Permittee shall maintain the following records:

(1) monitoring data; (2) monitor performance data, if applicable; and (3) corrective actions t aken.

C.14 Actions Related to Noncompliance Demonstrated by a Stack Test (a) When the results of a stack test performed in conformance with Section C

- Performance Testing, of this permit exceed the level specified in any condition of this permit, the Permittee shall take appropriate response actions. The Permittee shall submit a description of these response actions to IDEM, OAQ, within thirty (30) days of receipt of the test results. The Permittee shall take appropriate action to minimize excess emissions from the affected facility while the response actions are being implemented.

(b) A retest to demonstrate compliance shall be performed within one hundred twent y (120) days of receipt of the original test results. Should the Permittee demonstrate to IDEM, OAQ that retesting in one hundred twenty (120) days is not practicable, IDEM, OAQ may extend the retesting deadline.

(c) IDEM, OAQ reserves the authority to t ake any actions allowed under law in response to noncompliant stack tests.

The response action documents submitted pursuant to this condition do require the certification by an "authorized individual" as defined by 326 IAC 2

- 1.1

- 1(1)

.KYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Page 12 of 21 Franklin , Indiana Notice

- O nly Change No. 081

- 30224

- 00015 Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley

Record Keeping and Reporting Requirements [326 IAC 2

- 6.1

- 5(a)(2)]

C.15 Malfunctions Report [326 IAC 1

- 6

- 2]
Pursuant t o 326 IAC 1

- 6

- 2 (Records; Notice of Malfunction):

(a) A record of all malfunctions, including startups or shutdowns of any facility or emission control equipment, which result in violations of applicable air pollution control regulations or applicable emi ssion limitations shall be kept and retained for a period of three (3) years and shall be made available to the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM), Office of Air Quality (OAQ) or appointed representative upon request.

(b) When a malfun ction of any facility or emission control equipment occurs which lasts more than one (1) hour, said condition shall be reported to OAQ, using the Malfunction Report Forms (2 pages). Notification shall be made by telephone or facsimile, as soon as practica ble, but in no event later than four (4) daytime business hours after the beginning of said occurrence.

(c) Failure to report a malfunction of any emission control equipment shall constitute a violation of 326 IAC 1

- 6, and any other applicable rules. I nformation of the scope and expected duration of the malfunction shall be provided, including the items specified in
326 IAC 1

- 6

- 2(a)(1) through (6).

(d) Malfunction is defined as any sudden, unavoidable failure of any air pollution control equipment, pro cess, or combustion or process equipment to operate in a normal and usual manner. [326 IAC 1

- 2

- 39]

C.16 General Record Keeping Requirements [326 IAC 2

- 6.1

- 5] (a) Records o f all required monitoring data, reports and support information required by this permit shall be retained for a period of at least five (5) years from the date of monitoring sample, measurement, report, or application. These records shall be physically pr esent or electronically accessible at the source location for a minimum of three (3) years. The records may be stored elsewhere for the remaining two (2) years as long as they are available upon request. If the Commissioner makes a request for records to the Permittee, the Permittee shall furnish the records to the Commissioner within a reasonable time.

(b) Unless otherwise specified in this permit, all record keeping requirements not already legally required shall be implemented within ninety (90) days of permit issuance.

C.17 General Reporting Requirements [326 IAC 2

- 1.1

- 11] [326 IAC 2

- 6.1

- 2] [IC 13

- 14

- 1

- 13] (a) Reports required by condit ions in Section D of this permit shall be submitted to:

Indiana Department of Environmental Management Compliance Data Section, Office of Air Quality 100 North Senate Avenue MC 61

- 53 IGCN 1003 Indianapolis, Indiana 46204

- 2251

(b) Unless otherwise specif ied in this permit, any notice, report, or other submission required by this permit shall be considered timely if the date postmarked on the envelope or certified mail receipt, or affixed by the shipper on the private shipping receipt, is on or before the date it is due. If the document is submitted by any other means, it shall be considered timely if received by IDEM, OAQ on or before the date it is due.KYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Page 13 of 21 Franklin , Indiana Notice

- O nly Change No. 081

- 30224

- 00015 Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley

(c) Unless otherwise specified in this permit, all reports required in Section D of this permit shall be submitted within thirty (30) days of the end of the reporting period. All reports do require the certification by an "authorized individual" as defined by 326 IAC 2

- 1.1

- 1(1)

.



## INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (d) Reporting periods are based on calendar years, unless otherwise specifi ed in this permit. For the purpose of this permit “calendar year” means the twelve (12) month period from January 1 to December 31 inclusive.



## OFFICE OF AIR QUALITY MINOR SOURCE OPERATING PERMIT (MSOP) CERTIFI CATION

Source Name: KYB Manufacturing

– North America, Inc. Source Address: 2625 North Morton, Franklin, Indiana 46131 Mailing Address: 2625 North Morton, Franklin, Indiana 46131 MSOP No.: 081

- 23686

- 00015

This certification shall be included when submitting monitoring, testing reports/results or other documents as required by this permit.

Please check what document is being certified:

Annual Compliance Certification Letter

Test Result (specify )___________________________________________________

Report (specify)_______________________________________________________

Notification (specify)____________________________________________________

Affidavit (specify)_______________________________________________________

Other (specify)_________________________________________________________

I certify that, based on information and belief formed after reasonable inqu iry, the statements and information in the document are true, accurate, and complete.

Signature:

Printed Name:

Title/Position:

Date:

These are the new Section B and Section C conditions added to the permit as follows:

SECTION B GENERAL CONDITION S

B.1 Definitions [326 IAC 2

- 1.1

- 1] Terms in this permit shall have the definition assigned to such terms in the referenced regulation. In the absence of definitions in the referenced regulation, the applicableKYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Page 14 of 21 Franklin , Indiana Notice

- O nly Change No. 081

- 30224

- 00015 Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley

definitions found in the statutes or regulations (IC 13

- 11, 326 IAC 1

- 2 and 326 IAC 2

- 1.1

- 1 ) shall prevail.

B.2 Permit Term [326 IAC 2

- 6.1

- 7(a)][326 IAC 2

- 1.1

- 9.5][IC 13

- 15

- 3

- 6(a)] (a) This permit, M081

- 23686

- 00015

, is issued for a fixed term of ten (10) years from the issuance date of this permit, as determined in accordance with IC 4

- 21.5

- 3

- 5(f) and
I C 13

- 15

- 5

- 3. Subsequent revisions, modifications, or amendments of this permit do not affect the expiration date of this permit.

(b) If IDEM, OAQ, upon receiving a timely and complete renewal permit application, fails to issue or deny the permit renewal prior to the expiration date of this permit, this existing permit shall not expire and all terms and conditions shall continue in effect, until the renewal permit has been issued or denied.

B.3 Term of Conditions [326 IAC 2

- 1.1

- 9.5] Notwithstanding the permit term of a permit to construct, a permit to operate, or a permit modification, any condition established in a permit issued pursuant to a permitting program approved in the state implem entation plan shall remain in effect until:

(a) the condition is modified in a subsequent permit action pursuant to Title I of the Clean Air Act; or (b) the emission unit to which the condition pertains permanently ceases operation.

B.4 Enforceability Unless otherwise stated, all terms and conditions in this permit, including any provisions designed to limit the source's potential to emit, are enforceable by IDEM, the United States Environmental Protection Agen cy (U.S. EPA) and by citizens in accordance with the Clean
Air Act.

B.5 Severability The provisions of this permit are severable; a determination that any portion of this permit
is invalid shall not affect the va lidity of the remainder of the permit.

B.6 Property Rights or Exclusive Privilege This permit does not convey any property rights of any sort or any exclusive privilege.

B.7 Duty to Prov ide Information (a) The Permittee shall furnish to IDEM, OAQ, within a reasonable time, any information that IDEM, OAQ may request in writing to determine whether cause exists for modifying, revoking and reissuing, or terminating this permit, or to determine compliance with this permit. Upon request, the Permittee shall also furnish to IDEM, OAQ copies of records required to be kept by this permit.

(b) For information furnished by the Permittee to ID EM, OAQ, the Permittee may include a claim of confidentiality in accordance with 326 IAC 17.1. When furnishing copies of requested records directly to U. S. EPA, the Permittee may assert a claim of confidentiality in accordance with 40 CFR 2, Subpart B.KYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Page 15 of 21 Franklin , Indiana Notice

- O nly Change No. 081

- 30224

- 00015 Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley

B.8 Annual Notification [326 IAC 2

- 6.1

- 5(a)(5)] (a) An annual notification shall be submitted by an authorized individual to the Office of Air Quality stating whether or not the source is in operation and in compliance with the terms and conditions contained in this permit. (b) The annual notice shall be submitted in the format attached no later than March 1 of each year to: Indiana Department of Environmental Management Compliance and Enforcement Branch, Office of Air Quality 100 North Senate Avenue MC 61

- 53 IGCN 1003Indianapolis, Indiana 46204

- 2251

(c) The notification shall be considered timely if the date postmarked on the envelope or certified mail receipt, or affixed by the shipp er on the private shipping receipt, is on or before the date it is due. If the document is submitted by any other means, it shall be considered timely if received by IDEM, OAQ on or before the date it is due.

B.9 Preventive Maintenance Plan [326 IAC 1

- 6

- 3] (a) A Preventive Maintenance Plan meets the requirements of 326 IAC 1

- 6

- 3 if it includes, at a minimum:

(1) Identification of the individual(s) responsible for inspecting, maintain ing, and repairing emission control devices;

(2) A description of the items or conditions that will be inspected and the inspection schedule for said items or conditions; and

(3) Identification and quantification of the replacement parts that will be
mai ntained in inventory for quick replacement.

The Permittee shall implement the PMPs.

(b) If required by specific condition(s) in Section D of this permit where no PMP was previously required, the Permittee shall prepare and maintain Preventive
Maintenance Plans (PMPs) no later than ninety (90) days after issuance of this permit or ninety (90) days after initial start

- up, whichever is later, including the following information on each facility:

(1) Identification of the individual(s) responsible for inspec ting, maintaining, and repairing emission control devices;

(2) A description of the items or conditions that will be inspected and the inspection schedule for said items or conditions; and

(3) Identification and quantification of the replacement parts th at will be maintained in inventory for quick replacement.

If, due to circumstances beyond the Permittee’s control, the PMPs cannot be prepared and maintained within the above time frame, the Permittee may extend the date an additional ninety (90) days pro vided the Permittee notifies:

Indiana Department of Environmental Management Compliance and Enforcement Branch, Office of Air Quality 100 North Senate AvenueKYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Page 16 of 21 Franklin , Indiana Notice

- O nly Change No. 081

- 30224

- 00015 Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley

MC 61

- 53 IGCN 1003 Indianapolis, Indiana 46204

- 2251

The Permittee shall implement the PMPs.

(c) A copy of the PMPs shall be submitted to IDEM, OAQ upon request and within a reasonable time, and shall be subject to review and approval by IDEM, OAQ. IDEM, OAQ may require the Permittee to revise its PMPs whenever lack of proper
maintenance causes or i s the primary contributor to an exceedance of any
limitation on emissions.

(d) To the extent the Permittee is required by 40 CFR Part 60/63 to have an Operation Maintenance, and Monitoring (OMM) Plan for a unit, such Plan is deemed to satisfy the PMP requ irements of 326 IAC 1

- 6

- 3 for that unit.

B.10 Prior Permits Superseded [326 IAC 2

- 1.1

- 9.5] (a) All terms and conditions of permits established prior to M081

- 23686

- 00015 and
issued pursuant to permitting programs approved into the state implementation plan have been either:

(1) incorporated as originally stated, (2) revised, or (4) deleted.

(b) All previous registrations and permits are superseded by this permit.

B.11 Termination of Right to Operate [326 IAC 2

- 6.1

- 7(a)] The Permittee's right to operate this source terminates with the expiration of this permit unless a timely and complete renewal applica tion is submitted at least one hundred twenty (120) days prior to the date of expiration of the source’s existing permit, consistent with
326 IAC 2

- 6.1

- 7

.

B.12 Permit Renewal [326 IAC 2

- 6.1

- 7] (a) The application for renewal shall be submitted using the application form or forms prescribed by IDEM, OAQ and shall include the information specified in
326 IAC 2

- 6.1

- 7 . Such information shall be included in the application for each
emission unit at this source. The renewal application does require an affirmation that the statements in the application are true and complete by an "authorized
individual" as defined by 326 IAC 2

- 1.1

- 1(1)

. Request for renewal shall be submitted to: Indiana Department of Environmental Management Permit Administration and Support Section, Office of Air Quality 100 North Senate Avenue MC 61

- 53 IGCN 1003 Indianapolis, Indiana 46204

- 2251

(b) A timely renewal application is one that is:

(1) Submitted at least one hundred tw enty (120) days prior to the date of the expiration of this permit; andKYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Page 17 of 21 Franklin , Indiana Notice

- O nly Change No. 081

- 30224

- 00015 Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley

(2) If the date postmarked on the envelope or certified mail receipt, or affixed by the shipper on the private shipping receipt, is on or before the date it is
due. If the document i s submitted by any other means, it shall be considered timely if received by IDEM, OAQ on or before the date it is due.

(c) If the Permittee submits a timely and complete application for renewal of this permit, the source’s failure to have a permit is not a violation of 326 IAC 2

- 6.1 until IDEM, OAQ takes final action on the renewal application, except that this protection shall cease to apply if, subsequent to the completeness determination, the Permittee fails to submit by the deadline specified, pursuan t to 326 IAC 2

- 6.1

- 4(b)

, in writing by IDEM, OAQ any additional information identified as being needed to process the application.

B.13 Permit Amendment or Revision [326 IAC 2

- 5.1

- 3(e)(3)][326 IAC 2

- 6.1

- 6] (a) Permit amendments and revisions are governed by the requirements of
326 IAC 2

- 6.1

- 6 whenever the Permittee seeks to amend or modify this permit.

(b) Any application requesting an amendment or modifica tion of this permit shall be
submitted to:

Indiana Department of Environmental Management Permit Administration and Support Section, Office of Air Quality 100 North Senate Avenue MC 61

- 53 IGCN 1003 Indianapolis, Indiana 46204

- 2251

(c) The Permittee shal l notify the OAQ no later than thirty (30) calendar days of implementing a notice

- only change. [326 IAC 2

- 6.1

- 6(d)]

B.14 Source Modification Requirement A modification, construction, or reconst ruction is governed by the requirements of
326 IAC 2.

B.15 Inspection and Entry [326 IAC 2

- 5.1

- 3(e)(4)(B)][326 IAC 2

- 6.1

- 5(a)(4)][IC 13

- 14

- 2

- 2][IC 13

- 17

- 3

- 2][IC 13

- 30

- 3

- 1] Upon presentation of proper identification cards, credentials, and other documents as may be required by law, and subject to the Permittee’s right under all applicable laws and regulations to ass ert that the information collected by the agency is confidential and entitled to be treated as such, the Permittee shall allow IDEM, OAQ, U.S. EPA, or an authorized representative to perform the following:

(a) Enter upon the Permittee's premises where a p ermitted source is located, or emissions related activity is conducted, or where records must be kept under the conditions of this permit;

(b) As authorized by the Clean Air Act, IC 13

- 14

- 2

- 2, IC 13

- 17

- 3

- 2, and IC 13

- 30

- 3

- 1, have access to and copy , at re asonable times, any records that must be kept under the conditions of this permit;

(c) As authorized by the Clean Air Act, IC 13

- 14

- 2

- 2, IC 13

- 17

- 3

- 2, and IC 13

- 30

- 3

- 1, inspect , at reasonable times, any facilities, equipment (including monitoring and air pollution control equipment), practices, or operations regulated or required under this permit;KYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Page 18 of 21 Franklin , Indiana Notice

- O nly Change No. 081

- 30224

- 00015 Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley

(d) As authorized by the Clean Air Act, IC 13

- 14

- 2

- 2, IC 13

- 17

- 3

- 2, and IC 13

- 30

- 3

- 1, sample or monitor , at reasonable times, substances or parameters for the purpose of assuring compliance with this permit or applicable requirements; and

(e) As authorized by the Clean Air Act, IC 13

- 14

- 2

- 2, IC 13

- 17

- 3

- 2, and IC 13

- 30

- 3

- 1, utilize any photographic, recording, testing, monitoring, or other equipment for the

pur pose of assuring compliance with this permit or applicable requirements.

B.16 Transfer of Ownership or Operational Control [326 IAC 2

- 6.1

- 6] (a) The Permittee mus t comply with the requirements of 326 IAC 2

- 6.1

- 6 whenever the Permittee seeks to change the ownership or operational control of the source and no other change in the permit is necessary.

(b) Any application requesting a change in the ownership or operati onal control of the source shall contain a written agreement containing a specific date for transfer of permit responsibility, coverage and liability between the current and new Permittee. The application shall be submitted to:

Indiana Department of Envi ronmental Management Permit Administration and Support Section, Office of Air Quality 100 North Senate Avenue MC 61

- 53 IGCN 1003 Indianapolis, Indiana 46204

- 2251

The application which shall be submitted by the Permittee does require an
affirmation that th e statements in the application are true and complete by an "authorized individual" as defined by 326 IAC 2

- 1.1

- 1(1)

.

(c) The Permittee may implement notice

- only changes addressed in the request for a notice

- only change immediately upon submittal of the r equest. [326 IAC 2

- 6.1

- 6(d)(3)]

B.17 Annual Fee Payment [326 IAC 2

- 1.1

- 7] (a) The Permittee shall pay annual fees due no later than thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of a bill from IDEM, OAQ,

.

(b) The Permittee may call the following telephone numbers: 1

- 800

- 451

- 6027 or
317

- 233

- 4230 (ask for OAQ, Billing, Licensing, and Training Section), to determine the appropriate permit fee.

B.18 Credible Evidence [326 IAC 1

- 1

- 6] For the purpose of submitting compliance certifications or establishing whether or not the Permittee has violated or is in violation of any condition of this permit, nothing in this permit shall preclude the use , including the exclusive use, of any credible evidence or information relevant to whether the Permittee would have been in compliance with the condition of this permit if the appropriate performance or compliance test or procedure had been performed.

The following is Section E.1 that was added to the permit, the conditions were previously part of D.1 conditions and 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart N is included as Attachment A to the permit :KYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Page 19 of 21 Franklin , Indiana Notice

- O nly Change No. 081

- 30224

- 00015 Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley

SECTION E.1 EMISSIONS UNIT OPERATION CONDITIONS

Emissions Unit Description:

(a) Four (4) chrome electroplating lines with open surface hard chrome electroplating tanks, using hexavalent chromium and with a cumulative rectifier capacity of 882 million amp

hours pe r year (not including etch rectifiers) consisting of the following:

(1) One (1) hard chrome electroplating line (identified as P

- 1), constructed in 1997, consisting of seven (7) rectifiers: six (6) rectifiers with a maximum capacity of 6,000 amperes and one (1) etch rectifier with a maximum capacity of 4,000 amperes controlled by a composite wet mesh pad followed by three stage wet scrubber. This electroplating line has a maximum throughput capacity of 550 piston rods per hour. Emissions are exhausted thr ough stack H300

- A.

This electroplating tank is considered an existing large hard chromium electroplating tank under 40 CFR 63, Subpart N. [40 CFR 63, Subpart N]

(2) One (1) hard chrome electroplating line (identified as P

- 2), constructed in 1997, consisting of seven (7) rectifiers: six (6) rectifiers with a maximum capacity of 6,000 amperes and one (1) etch rectifier with a maximum capacity of 4,000 amperes controlled by a four

- stage wet scrubber where the first two stages are a wet packed bed followed by one stage of composite mesh pads and a final packed bed stage. This electroplating line has a maximum throughput capacity of 550 piston rods per hour. Emissions are exhausted through stack H200

- A.

This electroplating tank i s considered an existing large hard chromium electroplating tank under 40 CFR 63, Subpart N. [40 CFR 63, Subpart N]

(3) One (1) hard chrome electroplating line (identified as P

- 3), constructed in 2002, consisting of seven (7) rectifiers: six (6) rectifier s with a maximum capacity of 6,000 amperes and one (1) etch rectifier with a maximum capacity of 4,000 amperes controlled by a three stage wet scrubber where the first stage is a wet
bed scrubber followed by two stages of composite mesh pads . This electrop lating line has a maximum throughput capacity of 1000 piston rods per hour. Emissions are exhausted through stack H400

- A.

This electroplating tank is considered a new large hard chromium electroplating tank under 40 CFR 63, Subpart N. [40 C FR 63, Subpart N]

(4) One (1) hard chrome electroplating line (identified as P

- 4), constructed in 2005, consisting of eight (8) rectifiers: seven (7) rectifiers with a maximum capacity of 6,000 amperes and one (1) etch rectifier with a maximum capacity of 4,000 amperes controlled by a three stage wet scrubber where the first stage is a wet
bed scrubber followed by two stages of composite mesh pads . This electroplating line has a maximum throughput capacity of 1,350 piston rods per
hour. Emissions are exhau sted through stack H500

- A.

This electroplating tank is considered a new large hard chromium electroplating tank under 40 CFR 63, Subpart N. [40 CFR 63, Subpart N]

(The information describing the process contained in this emissions unit desc ription box is descriptive information and does not constitute enforceable conditions.)KYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Page 20 of 21 Franklin , Indiana Notice

- O nly Change No. 081

- 30224

- 00015 Permit Reviewer: Janet Mobley

National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) Requirements: Hard and Decorative Chromium Electroplating and Chromium Anodizing Tanks [326 IAC 20

- 8]

E.1.1 General Provisions Relating to National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants under 40 CFR Part 63 [326 IAC 20

- 1] [40 CFR Part 63, Subpart A] (a) Pursuant to 40 CFR 63.340(b), the Permittee shall comply with the provisions of 40 CFR P art 63, Subpart A

– General Provisions, which are incorporated by reference as 326 IAC 20

- 1

- 1, for the hard chromium electroplating operations P

- 1 through P

4as specified in Table 1 of 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart N in accordance with schedule in 40 CFR 63, Sub part N.

(b) Pursuant to 40 CFR 63.10, the Permittee shall submit all required notifications and reports to:

Indiana Department of Environmental Management Compliance and Enforcement Branch, Office of Air Quality 100 North Senate Avenue MC 61

- 53 IGCN 100 3 Indianapolis, Indiana 46204

- 2251

E.1.2 National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Hard and Decorative Chromium Electroplating and Chromium Anodizing Tanks: Requirements [40 CFR Part 63, Subpart N] The Permittee shall comply with th e following provisions of 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart N (included as Attachment A) which are incorporated by reference as 326 IAC 20

- 8 for the hard chromium electroplating operations P

- 1 through P

- 4.

(1) 40 CFR 63.340 (a), (b), (c), and (e) (2) 40 CFR 63.341 (3) 40 CFR 6 3.342 (a), (b)(1) through (b)(2)(ii), (c)(1)(i), (c)(3), (f)(1) through (f)(3)(B), (f)(3)(D) through (f)(3)(E), and Table 1 (4) 40 CFR 63.343 (a)(1)(ii), (a)(2), (a)(4), (a)(6), (b)(1), (c)(1), and (c)(3) (5) 40 CFR 63.344 (6) 40 CFR 63.345 (7) 40 CFR 63.346 (a), (b)(1) through (b)(11), and (c) (8) 40 CFR 63.347 (9) 40 CFR 63.348 (10) Table 1

Al l other conditions of the permit shall remain unchanged and in effect. Attached please find the entire revised permit.

A copy of the permit is available on the Internet at: http://www.in.gov/ai/appfiles/idem

- caats/

. For additional information about air permits and how the public and interested parties can participate, refer to the IDEM’s Guide for Citizen Participation and Permit Gu ide on the Internet at: www. idem. in.govAppendix A: Emission CalculationsPage 1 of 7 TSD Appendix AEmissions SummaryCompany Name: KYB Manufacturing North America, Inc.Address: 2625 North Morton, Franklin, Indiana 46131MSOP NOC: 081-30224-00015Reviewer: Janet MobleyCURRENT CALCULATIONSFROM PERMIT NOC 081-27420-00015 Unlimited Potential to Emit (tons/yr)PM PM10 PM2.5SO2NOx VOC CO Total HAPsElectroplating 18.3 18.3 18.3 -- -- -- -- 8.76Paint Booths 0.42 0.42 0.42 -- -- 1.40 -- --E-Coat Operations -- -- -- -- -- 1.18 -- 0.84Boilers and Heaters 0.46 1.83 0.14 0.14 24.0 1.32 20.2 0.45Welding 1.35 1.35 1.35 -- -- -- -- 0.08Total 20.53 21.90 21.90 0.14 24.00 3.90 20.20 10.13Increased Potential from theaddition of the Boilers andHeaters Shown on Page 60.02 0.1 0.1 0.01 0.9 0.05 0.72 0.02Potential Emissions After theAddition of this NOCUnlimited Potential to Emit (tons/yr)PM PM10 PM2.5SO2NOx VOC CO Total HAPsElectroplating 18.3 18.3 18.3 -- -- -- -- 8.76Paint Booths 0.42 0.42 0.42 -- -- 1.40 -- --E-Coat Operations -- -- -- -- -- 1.18 -- 0.84Boilers and Heaters 0.47 1.89 1.89 0.15 24.9 1.37 20.9 0.47Welding 1.35 1.35 1.35 -- -- -- -- 0.08Total 20.54 21.96 21.96 0.15 24.90 3.95 20.92 10.15Appendix A: Emission CalculationsPage 2 of 7 TSD Appendix AParticulate and HAP Emissions from Hard Chromium Electroplating Lines #1 through #4Company Name: KYB Manufacturing North America, Inc.Address: 2625 North Morton, Franklin, Indiana 46131MSOP NOC: 081-30224-00015Reviewer: Janet Mobley1. Potential to Emit Chromium Compounds from Electroplating Tanks (Not Including Etch Rectifiers)Emission Factor (grains/A-hr)Maximum AnnualCumulative RectifierCapacity (A-hr/yr)Line #1 0.12 211,680,000Line #2 0.12 211,680,000Line #3 0.12 211,680,000Line #4 0.12 246,960,000Total2. Potential to Emit Chromium Compounds from Etching TanksEmission Factor (grains/A-hr) Total Capacity (Amps)Line #1 0.12 4,000Line #2 0.12 4,000Line #3 0.12 4,000Line #4 0.12 4,000Total3. Potential to Emit PM/PM10 from Electroplating Tanks (Not Including Etch Rectifiers)Emission Factor (grains/A-hr)Maximum AnnualCumulative RectifierCapacity (A-hr/yr)Line #1 0.25 211,680,000Line #2 0.25 211,680,000Line #3 0.25 211,680,000Line #4 0.25 246,960,000Total4. Potential to Emit PM/PM10 from Etching TanksEmission Factor (grains/A-hr) Total Capacity (Amps)Line #1 0.25 4,000Line #2 0.25 4,000Line #3 0.25 4,000Line #4 0.25 4,000TotalAssume PM=PM10. The emission factors are from AP-42, Chapter 12.20, Table 12.20-1, July 1996 (SCC 3-09-010-18).The emissions from the electroplating tanks are calculated based on the Maximum Annual Cumulative Rectifier Capacity as definedin 40 CFR 63.341.This definition states that the maximum annual cumulative rectifier capacity is "the summation of the total installed rectifiercapacity associated with the hardchromium electroplating tanks at a facility, expressed in amperes, multiplied by the maximum potential operating schedule of 8,400 hours per year and 0.7,which assumes that electrodes are energized 70 percent of the total operating time."This definition is not used to calculate emissions from the etching tanks because pursuant to 40 CFR 63.340(c), etching tanks are not subject to therequirements of 40 CFR 63, Subpart N. Therefore, the total PTE of Chromium Compounds and PM/PM10 from each electroplating lineis the sum of theemissions calculated for the etching tanks and the electroplating tanks.MethodologyMaximum Annual Cumulative Rectifier Capacity (A-hr/yr) = 36,000 Amps (or 42,000 Amps) x 8,400 hrs/yr x 70%Potential to Emit from Electroplating Tanks (tons/yr) = Emission Factor (grains/A-hr) x Maximum Annual Cumulative Rectifier Capacity (A-hr/yr) x 1 lb/7,000 grains x 1 ton/2,000 lbsPotential to Emit from Etching Tanks (tons/yr) = Emission Factor (grains/A-hr) x Total Capacity (Amps) x 8,760 hrs/yr x 1 lb/7,000 grains x 1 ton/2,000 lbsPotential to Emit (tons/yr)1.811.810.632.50Potential to Emit (tons/yr)0.630.630.630.300.300.300.301.812.127.56Potential to Emit (tons/yr)3.784.4115.81.20Potential to Emit (tons/yr)3.783.78Appendix A: Emission CalculationsPage 3 of 7 TSD Appendix AVOC and Particulates from Paint BoothsCompany Name: KYB Manufacturing North America, Inc.Address: 2625 North Morton, Franklin, Indiana 46131MSOP NOC: 081-30224-00015Reviewer: Janet MobleyFA-10IVC IndustrialCoating500 0.00039 8.64 71.2% 55.4% 15.9% 3.22 1.37 80.0% 80.0% 0.26 6.3 1.16 0.42 0.08FA-5IVC IndustrialCoating200 0.0002 8.64 71.2% 55.4% 15.9% 3.22 1.37 100% N/A 0.05 1.3 0.24 0.00 0.00Total 0.32 7.66 1.40 0.42 0.08The paint booth FA-10 uses an air atomization application method. Control is by dry filter.The touch-up machine FA-5 applies coatings using a roller.The coating used in paint booth FA-10 and touch-up machine FA-5 does not contain any HAPs.The pounds of VOC per gallon of coating and pounds of VOC per gallon of coating less water shown above are from the most recentMSDS for this coating.MethodologyPTE of VOC (lbs/hr) = Pounds VOC per Gallon of Coating (lbs/gal) x Maximum Throughput (units/hr) x Gallons of Material (gal/unit)PTE of VOC (lbs/day) = PTE of VOC (lbs/hr) x 24 hrs/dayPTE of VOC (tons/yr) = PTE of VOC (lbs/hr) x 8,760 hrs/yr x 1 ton/2,000 lbsPTE of PM/PM10 Before Controls (tons/yr) = Maximum Throughput (units/hr) x Gallons of Material (gal/unit) x Density (lbs/gal) x(1 - Weight % Volatile) x (1 - Transfer Efficiency %) x 8,760 hrs/yr x 1 ton/2,000 lbsPTE of PM/PM10 After Controls (tons/yr) = PTE of PM/PM10 Before Controls (tons/yr) x (1 - Control Efficiency %)PTE ofVOC(tons/yr)Gallons ofMaterial(gal/unit)Weight %Volatile (H20 &Organics)ControlEfficiency%PTE ofVOC(lb/day)PTE ofVOC(lbs/hr)Pounds VOCper Gallon ofCoating LessWaterEmissionUnitMaterialPTE PM/PM10Before Controls(tons/yr)PTE PM/PM10After Controls(tons/yr)MaximumThroughput(units/hr)Density(lbs/gal)Weight %WaterTransferEfficiency%Pounds VOCper Gallon ofCoatingWeight %OrganicsAppendix A: Emission CalculationsPage 4 of 7 TSD Appendix AVOC, Particulates, and HAP Emissions from Dip Coating OperationsCompany Name: KYB Manufacturing North America, Inc.Address: 2625 North Morton, Franklin, Indiana 46131MSOP NOC: 081-30224-00015Reviewer: Janet MobleyE-Coat 1 CF665-415 550 0.00110 9.20 60.0% 59.7% 0.33% 0.08 0.03 100% 0.02 0.44 0.08 0.00E-Coat 2 CF665-415 600 0.00110 9.20 60.0% 59.7% 0.33% 0.08 0.03 100% 0.02 0.48 0.09 0.00E-Coat 3 CF665-415 1200 0.00110 9.20 60.0% 59.7% 0.33% 0.08 0.03 100% 0.04 0.95 0.17 0.00Total 0.08 1.86 0.34 0.00E-Coat 1, E-Coat 2, and E-Coat 3 use a dip coating application method and transfer efficiency is expected to be 100%.The coating material used in the E-Coat operations does not contain any HAPs.The pounds of VOC per gallon of coating and pounds of VOC per gallon of coating less water shown above are from the most recentMSDS for this coating.MethodologyPTE of VOC (lbs/hr) = Pounds VOC per Gallon of Coating (lbs/gal) x Maximum Throughput (units/hr) x Gallons of Material (gal/unit)PTE of VOC (lbs/day) = PTE of VOC (lbs/hr) x 24 hrs/dayPTE of VOC (tons/yr) = PTE of VOC (lbs/hr) x 8,760 hrs/yr x 1 ton/2,000 lbsPTE of PM/PM10 (tons/yr) = Maximum Throughput (units/hr) x Gallons of Material (gal/unit) x Density (lbs/gal) x (1 - Weight % Volatile) x (1 - Transfer Efficiency %) x 8,760 hrs/yr x 1 ton/2,000 lbsWeight %WaterWeight %OrganicsPounds VOCper Gallon ofCoatingPTE ofVOC(tons/yr)Pounds VOCper Gallon ofCoating LessWaterPTEPM/PM10(tons/yr)TransferEfficiency%PTE ofVOC(lbs/hr)PTE ofVOC(lb/day)Density(lbs/gal)Emission Unit MaterialMaximumThroughput(units/hr)Gallons ofMaterial(gal/unit)Weight %Volatile (H20 &Organics)Appendix A: Emission CalculationsPage 5 of 7 TSD Appendix AVOC and HAP Emissions from Solvent Usage for E-Coat 1, E-Coat 2, and E-Coat 3Company Name: KYB Manufacturing North America, Inc.Address: 2625 North Morton, Franklin, Indiana 46131MSOP NOC: 081-30224-00015Reviewer: Janet MobleyE-Coat 1 550 0.00110 0.01 7.41 100% 0.00% 100% 100% 7.41 0.04 1.08 0.20 0.20E-Coat 2 600 0.00110 0.01 7.41 100% 0.00% 100% 100% 7.41 0.05 1.17 0.21 0.21E-Coat 3 1200 0.00110 0.01 7.41 100% 0.00% 100% 100% 7.41 0.10 2.35 0.43 0.43Total 0.19 4.60 0.84 0.84E-Coat 1, E-Coat 2, and E-Coat 3 use a dip coating application method and transfer efficiency is expected to be 100%.MethodologyPounds of VOC per Gallon of Coating = Density (lbs/gal) x Weight % OrganicsPTE of VOC (lbs/hr) = Pounds VOC per Gallon of Coating (lbs/gal) x Maximum Throughput (units/hr) x Gallons of Material (gal/unit)PTE of VOC (lbs/day) = PTE of VOC (lbs/hr) x 24 hrs/dayPTE of VOC (tons/yr) = PTE of VOC (lbs/hr) x 8,760 hrs/yr x 1 ton/2,000 lbsPTE of HAP (tons/yr) = Maximum Throughput (units/hr) x Gallons of Material (gal/unit) x Density (lbs/gal) x Weight % HAP x 8,760 hrs/yr x 1 ton/2,000 lbsPTE ofVOC(tons/yr)Weight %Glycol EtherHexylCellosolveSolventPTE ofGlycolEther(tons/yr)PoundsVOC perGallon ofSolventPTE ofVOC(lbs/hr)PTE ofVOC(lb/day)Weight %WaterWeight %OrganicsEmission Unit MaterialMaximumThroughput(units/hr)Gallons ofCoating(gal/unit)Weight %Volatile (H20& Organics)Density ofSolvent(lbs/gal)Gallons ofSolvent perGallon ofCoatingAppendix A: Emission CalculationsPage 6 of 7 TSD Appendix ANatural Gas-fired Boilers, Cure Ovens, and HeatersCompany Name: KYB Manufacturing North America, Inc.Address: 2625 North Morton, Franklin, Indiana 46131MSOP NOC: 081-30224-00015Reviewer: Janet MobleyPM* PM10*SO2NOx ** VOC CO HAPsEmission Factor (lbs/MMscf) 1.9 7.6 0.6 100 5.5 84.0 1.89PTE (tons/year) 0.46 1.83 0.14 24.0 1.32 20.2 0.45MMBtu/hr MMCF/yr2.00 17.5PM* PM10* SO2 NOx VOC CO HAPsEmission Factor in lb/MMCF 1.9 7.6 0.6 100 5.5 84 1.89**see below0.02 0.1 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.70.02PM* PM10* SO2 NOx VOC CO HAPsTOTAL0.47 1.89 0.15 24.9 1.37 20.930.47MethodologyPollutantAll emission factors are based on normal firing.Total Heat Input Capacity Potential Throughput(MMBtu/hour) (MMscf/year)Total Emissions for Natural Gas Combustion Units after addition of unitsHeat Input Capacity Potential ThroughputPotential Emission in tons/yrMMBtu = 1,000,000 BtuMMCF = 1,000,000 Cubic Feet of GasEmission Factors are from AP 42, Chapter 1.4, Tables 1.4-1, 1.4-2, 1.4-3, SCC #1-02-006-02, 1-01-006-02, 1-03-006-02, and 1-03-006-03Potential Throughput (MMCF) = Heat Input Capacity (MMBtu/hr) x 8,760 hrs/yr x 1 MMCF/1,000 MMBtuEmission (tons/yr) = Throughput (MMCF/yr) x Emission Factor (lb/MMCF)/2,000 lb/tonCurrent Natural Gas Combustion CalculationsEmmission Calculations for the Addition of Units MAU-1, UH-1 and UH-256.0 481PollutantAppendix A: Emission CalculationsPage 7 of 7 TSD Appendix AWeldingCompany Name: KYB Manufacturing North America, Inc.Address: 2625 North Morton, Franklin, Indiana 46131MSOP NOC: 081-30224-00015Reviewer: Janet MobleyPM/PM10 Mn Ni Cr PM/PM10 Mn Ni Cr Total HAPsMetal Inert Gas(MIG)E70S 50 59.4 5.20 0.32 1.00E-03 1.00E-03 1.35 0.08 2.60E-04 2.60E-04 8.32E-02Emission factors are from AP-42, Chapter 12.19, Tables 12.19-1 and 12.19-2 (1/95).MethodologyPotential to Emit (tons/yr) = Max. Electrode Consumption (lbs/hr) x Emission Factor (lb pollutant/1,000 lbs of electrode) x 8,760 hrs/yr x 1 ton/2,000 lbsPotential to Emit (tons/yr)Process Electrode TypeNumber ofStationsTotal Max.ElectrodeConsumption(lbs/hr)Emission Factor (lb pollutant/1,000 lbelectrode)

# A ppendix A

KYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc.
2 625 North Morton Franklin , Indiana 4 6 131

Permit No. M 0 81

- 3 0 224

- 00 015

Title 40: Protection of Environment

Part 63

- National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants

Subpart N

— Nation al Emission Standards for Chromium Emissions From Hard and Decorative Chromium Electroplating and Chromium Anodizing TanksKYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Page 2 of 35 Franklin , Indiana M 0 81

- 30224

- 00 015 Reviewer: Janet Mobley

Title 40: Protection of Environment

Subpart N

— National Emission Standards for Chromium Emissions From Hard and Decorative Chrom ium Electroplating and Chromium Anodizing Tanks

Source: 60 FR 4963, Jan. 25, 1995, unless otherwise noted.

§ 63.340 Applicability and designation of sources.

(a) The affected source to which the provisions of this subpart apply is each chromium electr oplating or chromium anodizing tank at facilities performing hard chromium electroplating, decorative chromium electroplating, or chromium anodizing.

(b) Owners or operators of affected sources subject to the provisions of this subpart must also comply wit h the requirements of subpart A of this part, according to the applicability of subpart A of this part to such sources, as identified in Table 1 of this subpart.

(c) Process tanks associated with a chromium electroplating or chromium anodizing process, but in which neither chromium electroplating nor chromium anodizing is taking place, are not subject to the provisions of this subpart. Examples of such tanks include, but are not limited to, rinse tanks, etching tanks, and cleaning tanks. Likewise, tanks tha t contain a chromium solution, but in which no electrolytic process occurs, are not subject to this subpart. An example of such a tank is a chrome conversion coating tank where no electrical current is applied.

(d) Affected sources in which research and la boratory operations are performed are exempt from the provisions of this subpart when such operations are taking place.

(e) If you are an owner or operator of an area source subject to this subpart, you are exempt from the obligation to obtain a permit und er 40 CFR part 70 or 71, provided you are not required to obtain a permit under 40 CFR 70.3(a) or 71.3(a) for a reason other than your status as an area source under this subpart. Notwithstanding the previous sentence, you must continue to comply with the provisions of this subpart applicable to area sources.

[60 FR 4963, Jan. 25, 1995, as amended at 61 FR 27787, June 3, 1996; 64 FR 69643, Dec. 14, 1999; 70 FR 75345, Dec. 19, 2005]

§ 63.341 Definitions and nomenclature.

(a) Definitions. Terms used in this subpart are defined in the Act, in subpart A of this part, or in this section. For the purposes of subpart N of this part, if the same term is defined in subpart A of this part and in this section, it shall have the meaning given in this section.

Add

- on a ir pollution control device means equipment installed in the ventilation system of chromium electroplating and anodizing tanks for the purposes of collecting and containing chromium emissions from the tank(s).

Air pollution control technique means any meth od, such as an add

- on air pollution control device or a chemical fume suppressant, that is used to reduce chromium emissions from chromium electroplating and chromium anodizing tanks.

Base metal means the metal or metal alloy that comprises the workpiece.

Bath component means the trade or brand name of each component(s) in trivalent chromium plating baths. For trivalent chromium baths, the bath composition is proprietary in most cases. Therefore, the trade or brand name for each component(s) can be used; ho wever, the chemical name of the wetting agent contained in that component must be identified.

Chemical fume suppressant means any chemical agent that reduces or suppresses fumes or mists at the surface of an electroplating or anodizing bath; another term f or fume suppressant is mist suppressant.KYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Page 3 of 35 Franklin , Indiana M 0 81

- 30224

- 00 015 Reviewer: Janet Mobley

Chromic acid means the common name for chromium anhydride (CrO 3

Chromium anodizing means the electrolytic process by which an oxide layer is produced on the surface of a base metal for functional purposes (e.g., c orrosion resistance or electrical insulation) using a chromic acid solution. In chromium anodizing, the part to be anodized acts as the anode in the electrical circuit, and the chromic acid solution, with a concentration typically ranging from 50 to 100 gr ams per liter (g/L), serves as the electrolyte. ).

Chromium anodizing tank means the receptacle or container along with the following accompanying internal and external components needed for chromium anodizing: rectifiers fitted with controls to allow for vol tage adjustments, heat exchanger equipment, circulation pumps, and air agitation systems.

Chromium electroplating tank means the receptacle or container along with the following internal and external components needed for chromium electroplating: Rectifier s, anodes, heat exchanger equipment, circulation pumps, and air agitation systems.

Composite mesh

- pad system means an add

- on air pollution control device typically consisting of several mesh

- pad stages. The purpose of the first stage is to remove large par ticles. Smaller particles are removed in the second stage, which consists of the composite mesh pad. A final stage may remove any reentrained particles not collected by the composite mesh pad.

Decorative chromium electroplating means the process by which a thin layer of chromium (typically 0.003 to 2.5 microns) is electrodeposited on a base metal, plastic, or undercoating to provide a bright surface with wear and tarnish resistance. In this process, the part(s) serves as the cathode in the electrolytic cell and the solution serves as the electrolyte. Typical current density applied during this process ranges from 540 to 2,400 Amperes per square meter (A/m 2

Electroplating or anodizing bath means the electrolytic solution used as the conducting medium in which the flow of current is accompanied by movement of metal ions for the purposes of electroplating metal out of the solution onto a workpiece or for oxidizing the base material. ) for total plating times ranging between 0.5 to 5 minutes.

Emission limitation means, for the purposes of this subpart, the concentration of total chromium allowed to be emitted expressed in milligrams per dry standard cubic meter (mg/dscm), or the allowable surface tension expressed in dynes per centimeter (dynes/cm).

Enclosed hard chromium electroplating tank means a chromium electroplating tank that is equipped with an enclosing hood and ventilated at half the rate or less that of an open surface tank of the same surface area.

Facility means the major or area source at which chromi um electroplating or chromium anodizing is performed.

Fiber

- bed mist eliminator means an add

- on air pollution control device that removes contaminants from a gas stream through the mechanisms of inertial impaction and Brownian diffusion. These devices are typically installed downstream of another control device, which serves to prevent plugging, and consist of one or more fiber beds. Each bed consists of a hollow cylinder formed from two concentric screens; the fiber between the screens may be fabricated fr om glass, ceramic plastic, or metal.

Foam blanket means the type of chemical fume suppressant that generates a layer of foam across the surface of a solution when current is applied to that solution.

Fresh water means water, such as tap water, that has not been previously used in a process operation or, if the water has been recycled from a process operation, it has been treated and meets the effluent guidelines for chromium
wastewater.

Hard chromium electroplating or industrial chromium electroplating mean s a process by which a thick layer of chromium (typically 1.3 to 760 microns) is electrodeposited on a base material to provide a surface with functional properties such as wear resistance, a low coefficient of friction, hardness, and corrosion resistance. In this process, the part serves as the cathode in the electrolytic cell and the solution serves as the electrolyte. Hard chromiumKYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Page 4 of 35 Franklin , Indiana M 0 81

- 30224

- 00 015 Reviewer: Janet Mobley

electroplating process is performed at current densities typically ranging from 1,600 to 6,500 A/m 2

Hexavalent chromium means the form of chromium in a valence state of +6. for total plating times ranging from 20 minutes to 36 hours depending upon the desired plate thickness.

Large, hard chromium electroplating facility means a facility that performs hard chromium electroplatin g and has a maximum cumulative potential rectifier capacity greater than or equal to 60 million ampere

- hours per year (amp

hr/yr).

Maximum cumulative potential rectifier capacity means the summation of the total installed rectifier capacity associated with the hard chromium electroplating tanks at a facility, expressed in amperes, multiplied by the maximum potential operating schedule of 8,400 hours per year and 0.7, which assumes that electrodes are energized 70 percent of the total operating time. The max imum potential operating schedule is based on operating 24 hours per day, 7 days per week, 50 weeks per year.

Open surface hard chromium electroplating tank means a chromium electroplating tank that is ventilated at a rate consistent with good ventilation practices for open tanks.

Operating parameter value means a minimum or maximum value established for a control device or process parameter which, if achieved by itself or in combination with one or more other operating parameter values, determines that an owner or operator is in continual compliance with the applicable emission limitation or standard.

Packed

- bed scrubber means an add

- on air pollution control device consisting of a single or double packed bed that contains packing media on which the chromic acid droplets impinge. The packed

- bed section of the scrubber is followed by a mist eliminator to remove any water entrained from the packed

- bed section.

Research or laboratory operation means an operation whose primary purpose is for research and developm ent of new processes and products, that is conducted under the close supervision of technically trained personnel, and that is not involved in the manufacture of products for commercial sale in commerce, except in a de minimis manner.

Small, hard chromium electroplating facility means a facility that performs hard chromium electroplating and has a maximum cumulative potential rectifier capacity less than 60 million amp

- hr/yr.

Stalagmometer means an instrument used to measure the surface tension of a solutio n by determining the mass of a drop of liquid by weighing a known number of drops or by counting the number of drops obtained from a given volume of liquid.

Surface tension means the property, due to molecular forces, that exists in the surface film of all liquids and tends to prevent liquid from spreading.

Tank operation means the time in which current and/or voltage is being applied to a chromium electroplating tank or a chromium anodizing tank.

Tensiometer means an instrument used to measure the surface tension of a solution by determining the amount of force needed to pull a ring from the liquid surface. The amount of force is proportional to the surface tension.

Trivalent chromium means the form of chromium in a valence state of +3.

Trivalent chromium p rocess means the process used for electrodeposition of a thin layer of chromium onto a base material using a trivalent chromium solution instead of a chromic acid solution.

Wetting agent means the type of chemical fume suppressant that reduces the surface tension of a liquid.

(b) Nomenclature. The nomenclature used in this subpart has the following meaning:KYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Page 5 of 35 Franklin , Indiana M 0 81

- 30224

- 00 015 Reviewer: Janet Mobley

(1) AMR=the allowable mass emission rate from each type of affected source subject to the same emission limitation in milligrams per hour (mg/hr).

(2) A MR sys

(3) EL=the applicable emission limitation from §63.342 in milligrams per dry standard cu bic meter (mg/dscm). =the allowable mass emission rate from affected sources controlled by an add

- on air pollution control device controlling emissions from multiple sources in mg/hr.

(4) IA total

(5) IDA =the sum of all inlet duct areas from both affected and nonaffected sources in meters squared.

i

(6) IDA =the total inlet area for all ducts associated with affected sources in meters squared.

i,a

(7) VR=the total of ventilation rates for each type of affe cted source subject to the same emission limitation in dry standard cubic meters per minute (dscm/min). =the total inlet duct a rea for all ducts conveying chromic acid from each type of affected source performing the same operation, or each type of affected source subject to the same emission limitation in meters squared.

(8) VR inlet

(9) VR =the total ventilation rate from all inlet ducts associated with affected sources in dscm/min.

inlet,a

(10) VR =the total ventilation rate from all inlet ducts conveying chromic acid from each type of affected source performing the same operation, or each type of affected source subject to the same emission limitation in dscm/min.

tot

[60 FR 4963, Jan. 25, 1995, as amended at 69 FR 42894, July 19, 2004] =the average total ventilation rate for the three test ru ns as determined at the outlet by means of the Method 306 in appendix A of this part testing in dscm/min.

§ 63.342 Standards.

(a) Each owner or operator of an affected source subject t o the provisions of this subpart shall comply with these requirements on and after the compliance dates specified in §63.343(a). All affected sources are regulated by applying maximum achievable control technology.

(b) Applicability of emission limitations

. (1) The emission limitations in this section apply during tank operation as defined in §63.341, and during periods of startup and shutdown as these are routine occurrences for affected sources subject to this subpart. The emission limitations do not appl y during periods of malfunction, but the work practice standards that address operation and maintenance and that are required by paragraph (f) of this section must be followed during malfunctions.

(2) If an owner or operator is controlling a group of tanks with a common add

- on air pollution control device, the emission limitations of paragraphs (c), (d), and (e) of this section apply whenever any one affected source is operated. The emission limitation that applies to the group of affected sources is:

(i) T he emission limitation identified in paragraphs (c), (d), and (e) of this section if the affected sources are performing the same type of operation (e.g., hard chromium electroplating), are subject to the same emission limitation, and are not controlled by an add

- on air pollution control device also controlling nonaffected sources;

(ii) The emission limitation calculated according to §63.344(e)(3) if affected sources are performing the same type of operation, are subject to the same emission limitation, and are controlled with an add

- on air pollution control device that is also controlling nonaffected sources; and

(iii) The emission limitation calculated according to §63.344(e)(4) if affected sources are performing different types of operations, or affected sources are performing the same operations but subject to different emission limitations, andKYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Page 6 of 35 Franklin , Indiana M 0 81

- 30224

- 00 015 Reviewer: Janet Mobley

are controlled with an add

- on air pollution control device that may also be controlling emissions from nonaffected

sources.

(c)(1) Standards for open surface hard chromium electroplating tanks. During tank operation, each owner or operator of an existing, new, or reconstructed affected source shall control chromium emissions discharged to the atmosphere from that affected source by either:

(i) Not allowing the conc entration of total chromium in the exhaust gas stream discharged to the atmosphere to exceed 0.015 milligrams of total chromium per dry standard cubic meter (mg/dscm) of ventilation air (6.6 × 10 − 6

(ii) Not allo wing the concentration of total chromium in the exhaust gas stream discharged to the atmosphere to exceed 0.03 mg/dscm (1.3 × 10 grains per dry standard cubic foot (gr/dscf)) for all open surface hard chromium electroplating tanks that are affected sources other than those that are existing affected sources located at small hard chromium electroplating facilities; or

− 5

(iii) If a chemical fume suppressant containing a wetting agent is used, by not allowing the surface tension of the electroplating or anodizing bath contained within the affected tank to exceed 45 dynes per centimeter ( dynes/cm) (3.1
× 10 gr/dscf) if the open surface hard chromium electroplating tank is an existing affected source and is located at a small, hard chromium electroplating facility; or

− 3 pound

- force per foot (lb f /ft)) as measured by a stalagmometer or 35 dynes/cm (2.4 × 10 − 3 lb f

(2) Standards for enclosed hard chromium electroplating tanks. During tank operation, each own er or operator of an existing, new, or reconstructed affected source shall control chromium emissions discharged to the atmosphere from that affected source by either: /ft) as measured by a tensiometer at any time during tank operation.

(i) Not allowing the concentration of total chromium in the exhaust gas stream discharge d to the atmosphere to exceed 0.015 mg/dscm (6.6 × 10 − 6

(ii) Not allowing the concentration of total chromium in the exhaust gas stream discharged to the atmosphere to exceed 0.03 mg/dscm (1.3 × 10 gr/dscf) for all enclosed hard chromium electroplating tanks that are affected sources other than those that are existing affected sources located at small, hard chromium electroplating facilities; or

− 5

(iii) I f a chemical fume suppressant containing a wetting agent is used, by not allowing the surface tension of the electroplating or anodizing bath contained within the affected tank to exceed 45 dynes/cm (3.1 × 10 gr/dscf) if the enclosed hard chromium electroplating tank is an existing affected source and is located at a small, hard chromium electroplating facility; or

− 3 lb f /ft) as measured by a stalagmometer or 35 d ynes/cm (2.4 × 10 − 3 lb f

(iv) Not allowing the mass rate of total chromium in the exhaust gas stream discharged to the atmosphere to exceed the maximum allowable mass emission rate determ ined by using the calculation procedure in §63.344(f)(1)(i) for all enclosed hard chromium electroplating tanks that are affected sources other than those that are existing affected sources located at small, hard chromium electroplating facilities; or /ft) as measured by a tensiometer at any time during tank operation; or

(v) Not allowing the mass rate of total chromium in the exhaust gas stream discharged to the atmosphere to exceed the maximum allowable mass emission rate determined by using the calculation procedure in §63.344(f)(1)(ii) if the enclosed hard chromium electrop lating tank is an existing affected source and is located at a small, hard chromium electroplating facility.

(3)(i) An owner or operator may demonstrate the size of a hard chromium electroplating facility through the definitions in §63.341(a). Alternativel y, an owner or operator of a facility with a maximum cumulative potential rectifier capacity of 60 million amp

- hr/yr or more may be considered small if the actual cumulative rectifier capacity is less than 60 million

amp

- hr/yr as demonstrated using the fol lowing procedures:

(A) If records show that the facility's previous annual actual rectifier capacity was less than 60 million amp

- hr/yr, by using nonresettable ampere

- hr meters and keeping monthly records of actual ampere

- hr usage for each 12

- month rolling period following the compliance date in accordance with §63.346(b)(12). The actual cumulative rectifierKYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Page 7 of 35 Franklin , Indiana M 0 81

- 30224

- 00 015 Reviewer: Janet Mobley

capacity for the previous 12

- month rolling period shall be tabulated monthly by adding the capacity for the current month to the capacities for the pre vious 11 months; or

(B) By accepting a federally

- enforceable limit on the maximum cumulative potential rectifier capacity of a hard chromium electroplating facility and by maintaining monthly records in accordance with §63.346(b)(12) to demonstrate that th e limit has not been exceeded. The actual cumulative rectifier capacity for the previous 12

- month rolling period shall be tabulated monthly by adding the capacity for the current month to the capacities for the previous 11 months.

(ii) Once the monthly rec ords required to be kept by §63.346(b)(12) and by this paragraph (c)(3)(ii) show that the actual cumulative rectifier capacity over the previous 12

- month rolling period corresponds to the large designation, the owner or operator is subject to the emission limitation identified in paragraph (c)(1)(i), (iii), (c)(2)(i), (iii), or (iv) of this section, in accordance with the compliance schedule of §63.343(a)(5).

(d) Standards for decorative chromium electroplating tanks using a chromic acid bath and chromium a nodizing tanks. During tank operation, each owner or operator of an existing, new, or reconstructed affected source shall control chromium emissions discharged to the atmosphere from that affected source by either:

(1) Not allowing the concentration of tot al chromium in the exhaust gas stream discharged to the atmosphere to exceed 0.01 mg/dscm (4.4×10 − 6

(2) If a chemical fume suppressant containing a wetting agent is used, by not allowing the surface tension of the electroplating or anodizing bath contained within the affected source to exceed 45 dynes/cm (3.1 × 10 gr/dscf); or

− 3 lb f /ft) as measured by a stalagmometer or 35 dynes/cm (2.4 × 10 − 3 lb f

(e) Standards for decorative chromium electroplating tanks using a trivalent chromium bath. (1) Each owner or operator of an existing, n ew, or reconstructed decorative chromium electroplating tank that uses a trivalent chromium bath that incorporates a wetting agent as a bath ingredient is subject to the recordkeeping and reporting requirements of §§63.346(b)(14) and 63.347(i), but are not subject to the work practice requirements of paragraph (f) of this section, or the continuous compliance monitoring requirements in §63.343(c). The wetting agent must be an ingredient in the trivalent chromium bath components purchased from vendors. /ft) as measured by a tensiometer at any time during operation of the tank.

(2) E ach owner or operator of an existing, new, or reconstructed decorative chromium electroplating tank that uses a trivalent chromium bath that does not incorporate a wetting agent as a bath ingredient is subject to the standards of paragraph (d) of this sect ion.

(3) Each owner or operator of existing, new, or reconstructed decorative chromium electroplating tank that had been using a trivalent chromium bath that incorporates a wetting agent and ceases using this type of bath must fulfill the reporting require ments of §63.347(i)(3) and comply with the applicable emission limitation within the timeframe specified in §63.343(a)(7).

(f) Operation and maintenance practices. All owners or operators subject to the standards in paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section a re subject to these operation and maintenance practices.

(1)(i) At all times, including periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction, owners or operators shall operate and maintain any affected source, including associated air pollution control devices an d monitoring equipment, in a manner consistent with good air pollution control practices.

(ii) Malfunctions shall be corrected as soon as practicable after their occurrence.

(iii) Operation and maintenance requirements established pursuant to section 112 o f the Act are enforceable independent of emissions limitations or other requirements in relevant standards.

(2)(i) Determination of whether acceptable operation and maintenance procedures are being used will be based on information available to the Adminis trator, which may include, but is not limited to, monitoring results; review of the operation and maintenance plan, procedures, and records; and inspection of the source.KYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Page 8 of 35 Franklin , Indiana M 0 81

- 30224

- 00 015 Reviewer: Janet Mobley

(ii) Based on the results of a determination made under paragraph (f)(2)(i) of this s ection, the Administrator may require that an owner or operator of an affected source make changes to the operation and maintenance plan required by paragraph (f)(3) of this section for that source. Revisions may be required if the Administrator finds that the plan:

(A) Does not address a malfunction that has occurred;

(B) Fails to provide for the proper operation of the affected source, the air pollution control techniques, or the control system and process monitoring equipment during a malfunction in a ma nner consistent with good air pollution control practices; or

(C) Does not provide adequate procedures for correcting malfunctioning process equipment, air pollution control techniques, or monitoring equipment as quickly as practicable.

(3) Operation and m aintenance plan. (i) The owner or operator of an affected source subject to paragraph (f) of this section shall prepare an operation and maintenance plan no later than the compliance date, except for hard chromium electroplaters and the chromium anodizing operations in California which have until January 25, 1998. The plan shall be incorporated by reference into the source's title V permit, if and when a title V permit is required. The plan shall include the following elements:

(A) The plan shall specify th e operation and maintenance criteria for the affected source, the add

- on air pollution control device (if such a device is used to comply with the emission limits), and the process and control system monitoring equipment, and shall include a standardized c hecklist to document the operation and maintenance of this equipment;

(B) For sources using an add

- on control device or monitoring equipment to comply with this subpart, the plan shall incorporate the operation and maintenance practices for that device or monitoring equipment, as identified in Table 1 of this section, if the specific equipment used is identified in Table 1 of this section;

(C) If the specific equipment used is not identified in Table 1 of this section, the plan shall incorporate proposed

op eration and maintenance practices. These proposed operation and maintenance practices shall be submitted for approval as part of the submittal required under §63.343(d);

(D) The plan shall specify procedures to be followed to ensure that equipment or proce ss malfunctions due to poor maintenance or other preventable conditions do not occur; and

(E) The plan shall include a systematic procedure for identifying malfunctions of process equipment, add

- on air pollution control devices, and process and control sys tem monitoring equipment and for implementing corrective actions to address such malfunctions.

(ii) If the operation and maintenance plan fails to address or inadequately addresses an event that meets the characteristics of a malfunction at the time the pl an is initially developed, the owner or operator shall revise the operation and maintenance plan within 45 days after such an event occurs. The revised plan shall include procedures for operating and maintaining the process equipment, add

- on air pollution control device, or monitoring equipment during similar malfunction events, and a program for corrective action for such events.

(iii) Recordkeeping associated with the operation and maintenance plan is identified in §63.346(b). Reporting
associated with th e operation and maintenance plan is identified in §63.347 (g) and (h) and paragraph (f)(3)(iv) of this section.

(iv) If actions taken by the owner or operator during periods of malfunction are inconsistent with the procedures specified in the operation and maintenance plan required by paragraph (f)(3)(i) of this section, the owner or operator shall record the actions taken for that event and shall report by phone such actions within 2 working days after commencing actions inconsistent with the plan. This re port shall be followed by a letter within 7 working days after the end of the event, unless the owner or operator makes alternative reporting arrangements, in advance, with the Administrator.KYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Page 9 of 35 Franklin , Indiana M 0 81

- 30224

- 00 015 Reviewer: Janet Mobley

(v) The owner or operator shall keep the written operation and m aintenance plan on record after it is developed to be made available for inspection, upon request, by the Administrator for the life of the affected source or until the source is no longer subject to the provisions of this subpart. In addition, if the oper ation and maintenance plan is revised, the owner or operator shall keep previous (i.e., superseded) versions of the operation and maintenance plan on record to be made available for inspection, upon request, by the Administrator for a period of 5 years aft er each revision to the plan.

(vi) To satisfy the requirements of paragraph (f)(3) of this section, the owner or operator may use applicable standard operating procedure (SOP) manuals, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) plans, or other ex isting plans, provided the alternative plans meet the requirements of this section.

(g) The standards in this section that apply to chromic acid baths shall not be met by using a reducing agent to change the form of chromium from hexavalent to trivalent.

T able 1 to §63.342

— Summary of Operation and Maintenance Practices

Control technique Operation and maintenance practices Frequency

Composite mesh

- pad (CMP) system 1. Visually inspect device to ensure there is proper drainage, no chronic acid buildup on the pads, and no evidence of chemical attack on the structural integrity of the device 1. 1/quarter.

2. Visually inspect back portion of the mesh pad closest to the fan to ensure there is no breakthrough of chromic acid mist 2. 1/quarter.

3. Visually i nspect ductwork from tank to the control device to ensure there are no leaks 3. 1/quarter.

4. Perform washdown of the composite mesh

- pads in accordance with manufacturers recommendations 4. Per manufacturer.

Packed

- bed scrubber (PSB) 1. Visually inspe ct device to ensure there is proper drainage, no chromic acid buildup on the packed beds, and no evidence of chemical attack on the structural integrity of the device 1. 1/quarter.

2. Visually inspect back portion of the chevron blade mist eliminator t o ensure that it is dry and there is no breakthrough of chromic acid mist 2. 1/quarter.

3. Same as number 3 above 3. 1/quarter.

4. Add fresh makeup water to the top of the packed bed 4. Whenever makeup is added. a,b

PBS/CMP system 1. Same as for CM P system 1. 1/quarter.

2. Same as for CMP system 2. 1/quarter.

3. Same as for CMP system 3. 1/quarter.

4. Same as for CMP system 4. Per manufacturer.

Fiber

- bed mist eliminator 1. Visually inspect fiber

- bed unit and prefiltering device to

ensu re there is proper drainage, no chromic acid buildup in the units, and no evidence of chemical attack on the structural integrity of the devices c 1. 1/quarter.KYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Page 10 of 35 Franklin , Indiana M 0 81

- 30224

- 00 015 Reviewer: Janet Mobley

2. Visually inspect ductwork from tank or tanks to the control device to ensure there are no leaks 2. 1/quarter.

3. Perform washdown of fiber elements in accordance with manufacturers recommendations 3. Per manufacturer.

Air pollution control device (APCD) not
listed in rule To be proposed by the source for approval by the Administrator To be proposed by the source for approval by the Administrator.

Monitoring Equipment

Pitot tube Backflush with water, or remove from the duct and rinse with fresh water. Replace in the duct and rotate 180 degrees to ensure that the same zero reading is obtain ed. Check pitot tube ends for damage. Replace pitot tube if cracked or fatigued 1/quarter.

Stalagmometer Follow manufacturers recommendations

a If greater than 50 percent of the scrubber water is drained (e.g., for maintenance purposes), makeup water may be added to the scrubber basin.

b For horizontal

- flow scrubbers, top is defined as the section of the unit directly above the packing media such that the makeup water would flow perpendicular to the air flow through the packing. For vertical

- flow units, th e top is defined as the area downstream of the packing material such that the makeup water would flow countercurrent to the air flow through the unit.

c

[60 FR 4963, Jan. 25, 1995; 60 FR 33122, June 27, 1995, as amended at 61 FR 27787, June 3, 1996; 62 FR 42920, Aug. 11, 1997; 68 FR 37347, June 23, 2003; 69 FR 42894, July 19, 2004; 71 FR 20456, Apr. 20, 2006] Work practice standards for the control device installed upstream of the fiber

- bed mist eliminator to pr event plugging do not apply as long as the work practice standards for the fiber

- bed unit are followed.

§ 63.343 Compliance provisions.

(a) Compliance dates. (1) The owner or operator of an existing affected source shall comply with the emission limitations in §63.342 as follows:

(i) No later than 1 year after January 25, 1995, if the affected source is a decorative chromium electroplating tank; and

(ii) No later than 2 years after January 25, 1995, if the affected source is a hard chromium electroplating tank or a chromium anodizing tank.

(2) The own er or operator of a new or reconstructed affected source that has an initial startup after January 25, 1995, shall comply immediately upon startup of the source. The owner or operator of a new or reconstructed affected source that has an initial startup af ter December 16, 1993 but before January 25, 1995, shall follow the compliance schedule of §63.6(b)(1).

(3) The owner or operator of an existing area source that increases actual or potential emissions of hazardous air pollutants such that the area source becomes a major source must comply with the provisions for existing major sources, including the reporting provisions of §63.347(g), immediately upon becoming a major source.KYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Page 11 of 35 Franklin , Indiana M 0 81

- 30224

- 00 015 Reviewer: Janet Mobley

(4) The owner or operator of a new area source (i.e., an area source for which co nstruction or reconstruction was commenced after December 16, 1993) that increases actual or potential emissions of hazardous air pollutants such that the area source becomes a major source must comply with the provisions for new major sources, immediately upon becoming a major source.

(5) An owner or operator of an existing hard chromium electroplating tank or tanks located at a small, hard chromium electroplating facility that increases its maximum cumulative potential rectifier capacity, or its actual cu mulative rectifier capacity, such that the facility becomes a large, hard chromium electroplating facility must comply with the requirements of §63.342(c)(1)(i) for all hard chromium electroplating tanks at the facility no later than 1 year after the month in which monthly records required by §§63.342(c)(2) and 63.346(b)(12) show that the large designation is met, or by the compliance date specified in paragraph (a)(1)(ii) of this section, whichever is later.

(6) Request for an extension of compliance. An o wner or operator of an affected source or sources that requests an extension of compliance shall do so in accordance with this paragraph and the applicable paragraphs of §63.6(i). When the owner or operator is requesting the extension for more than one aff ected source located at the facility, then only one request may be submitted for all affected sources at the facility.

(i) The owner or operator of an existing affected source who is unable to comply with a relevant standard under this subpart may request that the Administrator (or a State, when the State has an approved part 70 permit program and the source is required to obtain a part 70 permit under that program, or a State, when the State has been delegated the authority to implement and enforce the emi ssion standard for that source) grant an extension allowing the owner or operator up to 1 additional year to comply with the standard for the affected source. The owner or operator of an affected source who has requested an extension of compliance under th is paragraph and is otherwise required to obtain a title V permit for the source shall apply for such permit or apply to have the title V permit revised to incorporate the conditions of the extension of compliance. The conditions of an extension of complia nce granted under this paragraph will be incorporated into the owner or operator's title V permit for the affected source(s) according to the provisions of 40 CFR part 70 or 40 CFR part 71, whichever is applicable.

(ii) Any request under this paragraph for an extension of compliance with a relevant standard shall be submitted in writing to the appropriate authority not later than 6 months before the affected source's compliance date as specified in this section.

(7) An owner or operator of a decorative chro mium electroplating tank that uses a trivalent chromium bath that incorporates a wetting agent, and that ceases using the trivalent chromium process, must comply with the emission limitation now applicable to the tank within 1 year of switching bath operat ion.

(b) Methods to demonstrate initial compliance. (1) Except as provided in paragraphs (b)(2) and (b)(3) of this section, an owner or operator of an affected source subject to the requirements of this subpart is required to conduct an initial performance test as required under §63.7, except for hard chromium electroplaters and chromium anodizing operations in California which have until January 25, 1998, using the procedures and test methods listed in §§63.7 and 63.344.

(2) If the owner or operator of an affected source meets all of the following criteria, an initial performance test is not required to be conducted under this subpart:

(i) The affected source is a hard chromium electroplating tank, a decorative chromium electroplating tank or a chromium ano dizing tank; and

(ii) A wetting agent is used in the plating or anodizing bath to inhibit chromium emissions from the affected source; and

(iii) The owner or operator complies with the applicable surface tension limit of §63.342(c)(1)(iii), (c)(2)(iii), or (d)(2) as demonstrated through the continuous compliance monitoring required by paragraph (c)(5)(ii) of this section.

(3) If the affected source is a decorative chromium electroplating tank using a trivalent chromium bath, and the owner or operator is sub ject to the provisions of §63.342(e), an initial performance test is not required to be conducted under this subpart.KYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Page 12 of 35 Franklin , Indiana M 0 81

- 30224

- 00 015 Reviewer: Janet Mobley

(c) Monitoring to demonstrate continuous compliance. The owner or operator of an affected source subject to the emission limitations of th is subpart shall conduct monitoring according to the type of air pollution control technique that is used to comply with the emission limitation. The monitoring required to demonstrate continuous compliance with the emission limitations is identified in th is section for the air pollution control techniques expected to be used by the owners or operators of affected sources.

(1) Composite mesh

- pad systems. (i) During the initial performance test, the owner or operator of an affected source, or a group of affe cted sources under common control, complying with the emission limitations in §63.342 through the use of a composite mesh

- pad system shall determine the outlet chromium concentration using the test methods and procedures in §63.344(c), and shall establish as a site

- specific operating parameter the pressure drop across the system, setting the value that corresponds to compliance with the applicable emission limitation, using the procedures in §63.344(d)(5). An owner or operator may conduct multiple performan ce tests to establish a range of compliant pressure drop values, or may set as the compliant value the average pressure drop measured over the three test runs of one performance test and accept ±2 inches of water column from this value as the compliant ran ge.

(ii) On and after the date on which the initial performance test is required to be completed under §63.7, except for hard chromium electroplaters and chromium anodizing operations in California, which have until January 25, 1998, the owner or operator of an affected source, or group of affected sources under common control, shall monitor and record the pressure drop across the composite mesh

- pad system once each day that any affected source is operating. To be in compliance with the standards, the compo site mesh

- pad system shall be operated within ±2 inches of water column of the pressure drop value established during the initial performance test, or shall be operated within the range of compliant values for pressure drop established during multiple perf ormance tests.

(iii) The owner or operator of an affected source complying with the emission limitations in §63.343 through the use of a composite mesh

- pad system may repeat the performance test and establish as a new site

- specific operating parameter the pressure drop across the composite mesh

- pad system according to the requirements in paragraphs (c)(1)(i) or (ii) of this section. To establish a new site

- specific operating parameter for pressure drop, the owner or operator shall satisfy the requirements s pecified in paragraphs (c)(1)(iii)(A) through (D) of this section.

(A) Determine the outlet chromium concentration using the test methods and procedures in §63.344(c);

(B) Establish the site

- specific operating parameter value using the procedures §63.344(d )(5);

(C) Satisfy the recordkeeping requirements in §63.346(b)(6) through (8); and

(D) Satisfy the reporting requirements in §63.347(d) and (f).

(iv) The requirement to operate a composite mesh

- pad system within the range of pressure drop values establishe d under paragraphs (c)(1)(i) through (iii) of this section does not apply during automatic washdown cycles of the composite mesh

- pad system.

(2) Packed

- bed scrubber systems. (i) During the initial performance test, the owner or operator of an affected sour ce, or group of affected sources under common control, complying with the emission limitations in §63.342 through the use of a packed

- bed scrubber system shall determine the outlet chromium concentration using the procedures in §63.344(c), and shall establ ish as site

- specific operating parameters the pressure drop across the system and the velocity pressure at the common inlet of the control device, setting the value that corresponds to compliance with the applicable emission limitation using the procedures in §63.344(d) (4) and (5). An owner or operator may conduct multiple performance tests to establish a range of compliant operating parameter values. Alternatively, the owner or operator may set as the compliant value the average pressure drop and inlet ve locity pressure measured over the three test runs of one performance test, and accept ±1 inch of water column from the pressure drop value and ±10 percent from the velocity pressure value as the compliant range.

(ii) On and after the date on which the init ial performance test is required to be completed under §63.7, except for hard chromium electroplaters and chromium anodizing operations in California which have until January 25, 1998, the owner or operator of an affected source, or group of affected sourc es under common control, shall monitor and record the velocity pressure at the inlet to the packed

- bed system and the pressure drop across the scrubber system once each day that any affected source is operating. To be in compliance with the standards, the scrubber system shall be operated within ±10 percent of the velocity pressure value established during the initial performance test, andKYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Page 13 of 35 Franklin , Indiana M 0 81

- 30224

- 00 015 Reviewer: Janet Mobley

within ±1 inch of water column of the pressure drop value established during the initial performance test, or within th e range of compliant operating parameter values established during multiple performance tests.

(3) Packed

- bed scrubber/composite mesh

- pad system. The owner or operator of an affected source, or group of affected sources under common control, that uses a pa cked

- bed scrubber in conjunction with a composite mesh

- pad system to meet the emission limitations of §63.342 shall comply with the monitoring requirements for composite mesh

- pad systems as identified in paragraph (c)(1) of this section.

(4) Fiber

- bed mist eliminator. (i) During the initial performance test, the owner or operator of an affected source, or group of affected sources under common control, complying with the emission limitations in §63.342 through the use of a fiber

- bed mist eliminator shall de termine the outlet chromium concentration using the procedures in §63.344(c), and shall establish as a site

- specific operating parameter the pressure drop across the fiber

- bed mist eliminator and the pressure drop across the control device installed upstre am of the fiber bed to prevent plugging, setting the value that corresponds to compliance with the applicable emission limitation using the procedures in §63.344(d)(5). An owner or operator may conduct multiple performance tests to establish a range of com pliant pressure drop values, or may set as the compliant value the average pressure drop measured over the three test runs of one performance test and accept ±1 inch of water column from this value as the compliant range.

(ii) On and after the date on whic h the initial performance test is required to be completed under §63.7, except for hard chromium electroplaters and chromium anodizing operations in California which have until January 25, 1998, the owner or operator of an affected source, or group of affe cted sources under common control, shall monitor and record the pressure drop across the fiber

- bed mist eliminator, and the control device installed upstream of the fiber bed to prevent plugging, once each day that any affected source is operating. To be i n compliance with the standards, the fiber

- bed mist eliminator and the upstream control device shall be operated within ±1 inch of water column of the pressure drop value established during the initial performance test, or shall be operated within the
rang e of compliant values for pressure drop established during multiple performance tests.

(5) Wetting agent

- type or combination wetting agent

- type/foam blanket fume suppressants. (i) During the initial performance test, the owner or operator of an affected so urce complying with the emission limitations in §63.342 through the use of a wetting agent in the electroplating or anodizing bath shall determine the outlet chromium concentration using the procedures in §63.344(c). The owner or operator shall establish a s the site

- specific operating parameter the surface tension of the bath using Method 306B, appendix A of this part, setting the maximum value that corresponds to compliance with the applicable emission limitation. In lieu of establishing the maximum surfac e tension during the performance test, the owner or operator may accept 45 dynes/cm as measured by a stalagmometer or 35 dynes/cm as measured by a tensiometer as the maximum surface tension value that corresponds to compliance with the applicable emission limitation. However, the owner or operator is exempt from conducting a performance test only if the criteria of paragraph (b)(2) of this section are met.

(ii) On and after the date on which the initial performance test is required to be completed under §63 .7, except for hard chromium electroplaters and chromium anodizing operations in California, which have until January 25, 1998, the owner or operator of an affected source shall monitor the surface tension of the electroplating or anodizing bath. Operation of the affected source at a surface tension greater than the value established during the performance test, or greater than 45 dynes/cm as measured by a stalagmometer or 35 dynes/cm as measured by a tensiometer if the owner or operator is using this value in accordance with paragraph (c)(5)(i) of this section, shall constitute noncompliance with the standards. The surface tension shall be monitored according to the following schedule:

(A) The surface tension shall be measured once every 4 hours during oper ation of the tank with a stalagmometer or a tensiometer as specified in Method 306B, appendix A of this part.

(B) The time between monitoring can be increased if there have been no exceedances. The surface tension shall be measured once every 4 hours of ta nk operation for the first 40 hours of tank operation after the compliance date. Once there are no exceedances during 40 hours of tank operation, surface tension measurement may be conducted once every 8 hours of tank operation. Once there are no exceedanc es during 40 hours of tank operation, surface tension measurement may be conducted once every 40 hours of tank operation on an ongoing basis, until an exceedance occurs. The minimum frequency of monitoring allowed by this subpart is once every 40 hours of tank operation.

(C) Once an exceedance occurs as indicated through surface tension monitoring, the original monitoring schedule of once every 4 hours must be resumed. A subsequent decrease in frequency shall follow the schedule laid out inKYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Page 14 of 35 Franklin , Indiana M 0 81

- 30224

- 00 015 Reviewer: Janet Mobley

paragraph (c)(5) (ii)(B) of this section. For example, if an owner or operator had been monitoring an affected source once every 40 hours and an exceedance occurs, subsequent monitoring would take place once every 4 hours of tank operation. Once an exceedance does not occu r for 40 hours of tank operation, monitoring can occur once every 8 hours of tank operation. Once an exceedance does not occur for 40 hours of tank operation on this schedule, monitoring can occur once every 40 hours of tank operation.

(iii) Once a bath so lution is drained from the affected tank and a new solution added, the original monitoring schedule of once every 4 hours must be resumed, with a decrease in monitoring frequency allowed following the procedures of paragraphs (c)(5)(ii) (B) and (C) of this section.

(6) Foam blanket

- type fume suppressants. (i) During the initial performance test, the owner or operator of an affected source complying with the emission limitations in §63.342 through the use of a foam blanket in the electroplating or anodizing bath shall determine the outlet chromium concentration using the procedures in §63.344(c), and shall
establish as the site

- specific operating parameter the thickness of the foam blanket, setting the minimum thickness that corresponds to compliance with the applicable emission limitation. In lieu of establishing the minimum foam blanket thickness during the performance test, the owner or operator may accept 2.54 centimeters (1 inch) as the minimum foam blanket thickness that corresponds to compliance with th e applicable emission limitation. All foam blanket measurements must be taken in close proximity to the workpiece or cathode area in the plating tank(s).

(ii) On and after the date on which the initial performance test is required to be completed under §63 .7, except for hard chromium electroplaters and chromium anodizing operations in California which have until January 25, 1998, the owner or operator of an affected source shall monitor the foam blanket thickness of the electroplating or anodizing bath. Ope ration of the affected source at a foam blanket thickness less than the value established during the performance test, or less than 2.54 cm (1 inch) if the owner or operator is using this value in accordance with paragraph (c)(6)(i) of this section, shall constitute noncompliance with the standards. The foam blanket thickness shall be measured according to the following schedule:

(A) The foam blanket thickness shall be measured once every 1 hour of tank operation.

(B) The time between monitoring can be incr eased if there have been no exceedances. The foam blanket thickness shall be measured once every hour of tank operation for the first 40 hours of tank operation after the compliance date. Once there are no exceedances for 40 hours of tank operation, foam b lanket thickness measurement may be conducted once every 4 hours of tank operation. Once there are no exceedances during 40 hours of tank operation, foam blanket thickness measurement may be conducted once every 8 hours of tank operation on an ongoing basi s, until an exceedance occurs. The minimum frequency of monitoring allowed by this subpart is once per 8 hours of tank operation.

(C) Once an exceedance occurs as indicated through foam blanket thickness monitoring, the original monitoring schedule of once every hour must be resumed. A subsequent decrease in frequency shall follow the schedule laid out in paragraph (c)(6)(ii)(B) of this section. For example, if an owner or operator had been monitoring an affected source once every 8 hours and an exceedance occurs, subsequent monitoring would take place once every hour of tank operation. Once an exceedance does not occur for 40 hours of tank operation, monitoring can occur once every 4 hours of tank operation. Once an exceedance does not occur for 40 hours of tank operation on this schedule, monitoring can occur once every 8 hours of tank operation.

(iii) Once a bath solution is drained from the affected tank and a new solution added, the original monitoring schedule of once every hour must be resumed, with a decrease in monitoring frequency allowed following the procedures of paragraphs (c)(6)(ii) (B) and (C) of this section.

(7) Fume suppressant/add

- on control device. (i) If the owner or operator of an affected source uses both a fume suppressant and add

- on c ontrol device and both are needed to comply with the applicable emission limit, monitoring requirements as identified in paragraphs (c) (1) through (6) of this section, and the work practice standards of Table 1 of §63.342, apply for each of the control te chniques used.

(ii) If the owner or operator of an affected source uses both a fume suppressant and add

- on control device, but only one of these techniques is needed to comply with the applicable emission limit, monitoring requirements as identified in par agraphs (c) (1) through (6) of this section, and work practice standards of Table 1 of §63.342, apply only for the control technique used to achieve compliance.KYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Page 15 of 35 Franklin , Indiana M 0 81

- 30224

- 00 015 Reviewer: Janet Mobley

(8) Use of an alternative monitoring method. (i) Requests and approvals of alternative monitori ng methods shall be considered in accordance with §63.8(f)(1), (f)(3), (f)(4), and (f)(5).

(ii) After receipt and consideration of an application for an alternative monitoring method, the Administrator may approve alternatives to any monitoring methods or procedures of this subpart including, but not limited to, the following:

(A) Alternative monitoring requirements when installation or use of monitoring devices specified in this subpart would not provide accurate measurements due to interferences caused by substances within the effluent gases; or

(B) Alternative locations for installing monitoring devices when the owner or operator can demonstrate that installation at alternate locations will enable accurate and representative measurements.

(d) An owner or operator who uses an air pollution control device not listed in this section shall submit a description of the device, test results collected in accordance with §63.344(c) verifying the performance of the device for reducing chromium emissions to the atmos phere to the level required by this subpart, a copy of the operation and maintenance plan referenced in §63.342(f) including operation and maintenance practices, and appropriate operating parameters that will be monitored to establish continuous compliance with the standards. The monitoring plan submitted identifying the continuous compliance monitoring is subject to the Administrator's approval.

[60 FR 4963, Jan. 25, 1995; 60 FR 33122, June 27, 1995, as amended at 62 FR 42920, Aug. 11, 1997; 68 FR 37347, J une 23, 2003; 69 FR 42895, July 19, 2004]

§ 63.344 Performance test requirements and test methods.

(a) Performance test requirements. Performance tests shall be conducted using the test methods and procedures in this section and §63.7. Performance test r esults shall be documented in complete test reports that contain the information required by paragraphs (a)(1) through (a)(9) of this section. The test plan to be followed shall be made available to the Administrator prior to the testing, if requested.

(1) A brief process description;

(2) Sampling location description(s);

(3) A description of sampling and analytical procedures and any modifications to standard procedures;

(4) Test results;

(5) Quality assurance procedures and results;

(6) Records of operati ng conditions during the test, preparation of standards, and calibration procedures;

(7) Raw data sheets for field sampling and field and laboratory analyses;

(8) Documentation of calculations; and

(9) Any other information required by the test method.

(b) (1) If the owner or operator of an affected source conducts performance testing at startup to obtain an operating permit in the State in which the affected source is located, the results of such testing may be used to demonstrate compliance with this subpa rt if:

(i) The test methods and procedures identified in paragraph (c) of this section were used during the performance test;

(ii) The performance test was conducted under representative operating conditions for the source;KYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Page 16 of 35 Franklin , Indiana M 0 81

- 30224

- 00 015 Reviewer: Janet Mobley

(iii) The performance test repor t contains the elements required by paragraph (a) of this section; and

(iv) The owner or operator of the affected source for which the performance test was conducted has sufficient data to establish the operating parameter value(s) that correspond to compl iance with the standards, as required for continuous compliance monitoring under §63.343(c).

(2) The results of tests conducted prior to December 1991 in which Method 306A, appendix A of this part, was used to demonstrate the performance of a control techn ique are not acceptable.

(c) Test methods. Each owner or operator subject to the provisions of this subpart and required by §63.343(b) to conduct an initial performance test shall use the test methods identified in this section to demonstrate compliance wi th the standards in §63.342.

(1) Method 306 or Method 306A, “Determination of Chromium Emissions From Decorative and Hard Chromium Electroplating and Anodizing Operations,” appendix A of this part shall be used to determine the chromium concentration from hard or decorative chromium electroplating tanks or chromium anodizing tanks. The sampling time and sample volume for each run of Methods 306 and 306A, appendix A of this part shall be at least 120 minutes and 1.70 dscm (60 dscf), respectively. Methods 306 and 306A, appendix A of this part allow the measurement of either total chromium or hexavalent chromium emissions. For the purposes of this standard, sources using chromic acid baths can demonstrate compliance with the emission limits of §63.342 by measur ing either total chromium or hexavalent chromium. Hence, the hexavalent chromium concentration measured by these methods is equal to the total chromium concentration for the affected operations.

(2) The California Air Resources Board (CARB) Method 425 (whi ch is available by contacting the California Air Resources Board, 1102 Q Street, Sacramento, California 95814) may be used to determine the chromium concentration from hard and decorative chromium electroplating tanks and chromium anodizing tanks if the fo llowing conditions are met:

(i) If a colorimetric analysis method is used, the sampling time and volume shall be sufficient to result in 33 to 66 micrograms of catch in the sampling train.

(ii) If Atomic Absorption Graphite Furnace (AAGF) or Ion Chromatogr aphy with a Post

- column Reactor (ICPCR) analyses were used, the sampling time and volume should be sufficient to result in a sample catch that is 5 to 10 times the minimum detection limit of the analytical method (i.e., 1.0 microgram per liter of sample fo r AAGF and 0.5 microgram per liter of sample for ICPCR).

(iii) In the case of either paragraph (c)(2) (i) or (ii) of this section, a minimum of 3 separate runs must be conducted. The other requirements of §63.7 that apply to affected sources, as indicated in Table 1 of this subpart, must also be
met.

(3) Method 306B, “Surface Tension Measurement and Recordkeeping for Tanks Used at Decorative Chromium Electroplating and Anodizing Facilities,” appendix A of this part shall be used to measure the surface tensi on of electroplating and anodizing baths.

(4) Alternate test methods may also be used if the method has been validated using Method 301, appendix A of this part and if approved by the Administrator. Procedures for requesting and obtaining approval are cont ained in §63.7(f).

(d) Establishing site

- specific operating parameter values. (1) Each owner or operator required to establish site

specific operating parameters shall follow the procedures in this section.

(2) All monitoring equipment shall be installed s uch that representative measurements of emissions or process parameters from the affected source are obtained. For monitoring equipment purchased from a vendor, verification of the operational status of the monitoring equipment shall include execution of t he manufacturer's written specifications or recommendations for installation, operation, and calibration of the system.

(i) Specifications for differential pressure measurement devices used to measure velocity pressure shall be in accordance with section 2 .2 of Method 2 (40 CFR part 60, appendix A).KYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Page 17 of 35 Franklin , Indiana M 0 81

- 30224

- 00 015 Reviewer: Janet Mobley

(ii) Specification for differential pressure measurement devices used to measure pressure drop across a control system shall be in accordance with manufacturer's accuracy specifications.

(3) The surface tension of electroplating and anodizing baths shall be measured using Method 306B, “Surface Tension Measurement and Recordkeeping for Tanks used at Decorative Chromium Electroplating and Anodizing Facilities,” appendix A of this part. This method should also be fo llowed when wetting agent type or combination wetting agent/foam blanket type fume suppressants are used to control chromium emissions from a hard chromium electroplating tank and surface tension measurement is conducted to demonstrate continuous complianc e.

(4) The owner or operator of a source required to measure the velocity pressure at the inlet to an add

- on air pollution control device in accordance with §63.343(c)(2), shall establish the site

- specific velocity pressure as follows:

(i) Locate a velocit y traverse port in a section of straight duct that connects the hooding on the plating tank or tanks with the control device. The port shall be located as close to the control system as possible, and shall be placed a minimum of 2 duct diameters downstream and 0.5 diameter upstream of any flow disturbance such as a bend, expansion, or contraction (see Method 1, 40 CFR part 60, appendix A). If 2.5 diameters of straight duct work does not exist, locate the port 0.8 of the duct diameter downstream and 0.2 of t he duct diameter upstream from any flow disturbance.

(ii) A 12

- point velocity traverse of the duct to the control device shall be conducted along a single axis according to Method 2 (40 CFR part 60, appendix A) using an S

- type pitot tube; measurement of th e barometric pressure and duct temperature at each traverse point is not required, but is suggested. Mark the S

- type pitot tube as specified in Method 1 (40 CFR part 60, appendix A) with 12 points. Measure the velocity pressure (Δ p) values for the velocity points and record. Determine the square root of the individual velocity point Δ p values and average. The point with the square root value that comes closest to the average square root value is the point of average velocity. The Δ p value measured for this point during the performance test will be used as the reference for future monitoring.

(5) The owner or operator of a source required to measure the pressure drop across the add

- on air pollution control device in accordance with §63.343(c) (1) through (4) may establish the pressure drop in accordance with the following guidelines:

(i) Pressure taps shall be installed at any of the following locations:

(A) At the inlet and outlet of the control system. The inlet tap should be installed in the ductwork just prior to the control device and the corresponding outlet pressure tap should be installed on the outlet side of the control device prior to the blower or on the downstream side of the blower;

(B) On each side of the packed bed within the control system or on each side of each mesh pad within the control system; or

(C) On the front side of the first mesh pad and back side of the last mesh pad within the control system.

(ii) Pressure taps shall be sited at locations that are:

(A) Free from pluggage as possibl e and away from any flow disturbances such as cyclonic demisters.

(B) Situated such that no air infiltration at measurement site will occur that could bias the measurement.

(iii) Pressure taps shall be constructed of either polyethylene, polybutylene, or o ther nonreactive materials.

(iv) Nonreactive plastic tubing shall be used to connect the pressure taps to the device used to measure pressure drop.

(v) Any of the following pressure gauges can be used to monitor pressure drop: a magnehelic gauge, an inclin ed manometer, or a “U” tube manometer.KYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Page 18 of 35 Franklin , Indiana M 0 81

- 30224

- 00 015 Reviewer: Janet Mobley

(vi) Prior to connecting any pressure lines to the pressure gauge(s), each gauge should be zeroed. No calibration of the pressure gauges is required.

(e) Special compliance provisions for multiple sources controlled b y a common add

- on air pollution control device. (1) This section identifies procedures for measuring the outlet chromium concentration from an add

- on air pollution control device that is used to control multiple sources that may or may not include sources not affected by this subpart.

(2) When multiple affected sources performing the same type of operation (e.g., all are performing hard chromium electroplating), and subject to the same emission limitation, are controlled with an add

- on air pollution control device that is not controlling emissions from any other type of affected operation or from any nonaffected sources, the applicable emission limitation identified in §63.342 must be met at the outlet of the add

- on air pollution control device.

(3) When mul tiple affected sources performing the same type of operation and subject to the same emission limitation are controlled with a common add

- on air pollution control device that is also controlling emissions from sources not affected by these standards, the f ollowing procedures should be followed to determine compliance with the applicable emission limitation in §63.342:

(i) Calculate the cross

- sectional area of each inlet duct (i.e., uptakes from each hood) including those not affected by the standard.

(ii) D etermine the total sample time per test run by dividing the total inlet area from all tanks connected to the control system by the total inlet area for all ducts associated with affected sources, and then multiply this number by 2 hours. The calculated tim e is the minimum sample time required per test run.

(iii) Perform Method 306 testing and calculate an outlet mass emission rate.

(iv) Determine the total ventilation rate from the affected sources by using equation 1:

where VR tot is the average total ventilation rate in dscm/min for the three test runs as determined at the outlet by means of the Method 306 testing; IDA i is the total inlet area for all ducts ass ociated with affected sources; IA total is the sum of all inlet duct areas from both affected and nonaffected sources; and VR inlet

(v) Establish the allowable mass emission r ate of the system (AMR is the total ventilation rate from all inlet ducts associated with affected sources.

sys ) in milligrams of total chromium per hour (mg/hr) using equation 2:

where Σ VR inlet is the total ventilation rate in dscm/min from the affected sources, and EL is the applicable emission limitation from §63.342 in mg/dscm. The allowable mass emission rate (AMR sys

(4) When multiple affected sources performing different types of operations (e.g., hard chromium electroplating, decorative chromium electroplating, or chromium anodizing) a re controlled by a common add

- on air pollution control device that may or may not also be controlling emissions from sources not affected by these standards, or if the affected sources controlled by the common add

- on air pollution control device perform th e same operation but are subject to different emission limitations (e.g., because one is a new hard chromium plating tank and one is an existing small, hard chromium plating tank), the following procedures should be followed to determine compliance with th e applicable emission limitation in §63.342: ) calculated from equation 2 should be equal to or more than the outlet three

- run average mass emission rate determined from Method 306 testing in order for the source to be in compliance with the standard.KYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Page 19 of 35 Franklin , Indiana M 0 81

- 30224

- 00 015 Reviewer: Janet Mobley

(i) Follow the steps outlined in paragraphs (e)(3)(i) through (e)(3)(iii) of this section.

(ii) Determine the total ventilation rate for each type of affected source using equation 3:

where VR tot is the average total ventilation rate in dscm/min for the three test runs as determined at the outlet by means of the Method 306 testing; IDA i,a is the total inlet duct area for all ducts conveying chromic acid from each type of affected source performing the same operation, or each type of affected source subject to the same emission limitation; IA total is the sum of all duct areas from both affected and nonaffected sources; and VR inlet,a

(iii) Establish the allowable m ass emission rate in mg/hr for each type of affected source that is controlled by the add

on air pollution control device using equation 4, 5, 6, or 7 as appropriate: is the total ventilation rate from all inlet ducts conveying chromic acid from each type of affected source performing the same operation, or each type of affected source subject to the same emission limitation.

VR hc1 × EL hc1 × 60 minutes/hour = AMR hc1

VR (4)

hc2 × EL hc2 × 60 minutes/hour = AMR hc2

VR ( 5)

dc × EL dc × 60 minutes/hour = AMR dc

VR (6)

ca × EL ca × 60 minutes/hour = AMR ca

where “hc” applies to the total of ventilation rates for all hard chromium electroplating tanks subject to the same emission limitation, “dc” applies to the total of v entilation rates for the decorative chromium electroplating tanks, “ca” applies to the total of ventilation rates for the chromium anodizing tanks, and EL is the applicable emission limitation from §63.342 in mg/dscm. There are two equations for hard
chrom ium electroplating tanks because different emission limitations may apply (e.g., a new tank versus an existing, small tank). (7)

(iv) Establish the allowable mass emission rate (AMR) in mg/hr for the system using equation 8, including each type of affected sou rce as appropriate:

AMR hc1 + AMR hc2 + AMR dc + AMR ca = AMR sys

The allowable mass emission rate calculated from equation 8 should be equal to or more than the outlet three

- run average mass emission rate determined from Method 306 testing in order for the source to be in compliance with the standards. (8)

(5) Each owner or operator that uses the special compliance provisions of this paragraph to demonstrate compliance with the emission limitations of §63.342 shall submit the measurements and calculations to sup port these compliance methods with the notification of compliance status required by §63.347(e).

(6) Each owner or operator that uses the special compliance provisions of this section to demonstrate compliance with the emission limitations of §63.342 shall repeat these procedures if a tank is added or removed from the control system regardless of whether that tank is a nonaffected source. If the new nonaffected tank replaces an existing nonaffected tank of the same size and is connected to the control syste m through the same size inlet duct then this procedure does not have to be repeated.KYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Page 20 of 35 Franklin , Indiana M 0 81

- 30224

- 00 015 Reviewer: Janet Mobley

(f) Compliance provisions for the mass rate emission standard for enclosed hard chromium electroplating tanks. (1) This section identifies procedures for calculating the m aximum allowable mass emission rate for owners or operators of affected sources who choose to meet the mass emission rate standard in §63.342(c)(2)(iv) or (v).

(i)(A) The owner or operator of an enclosed hard chromium electroplating tank that is an affecte d source other than an existing affected source located at a small hard chromium electroplating facility who chooses to meet the mass emission rate standard in §63.342(c)(2)(iv) shall determine compliance by not allowing the mass rate of total
chromium in the exhaust gas stream discharged to the atmosphere to exceed the maximum allowable mass emission rate calculated using equation 9:

MAMER = ETSA × K × 0.015 mg/dscm (9)

Where:

MAMER = the alternative emission rate for enclosed hard chromium electroplating tanks in mg/hr.

ETSA = the hard chromium electroplating tank surface area in square feet(ft 2

K = a conversion factor, 425 dscm/(ft ).

2

(B) Compliance with the alternative mass emission limit is demonstrated if the three

- run average mass emission ra te determined from Method 306 testing is less than or equal to the maximum allowable mass emission rate calculated from equation 9. × hr).

(ii)(A) The owner or operator of an enclosed hard chromium electroplating tank that is an existing affected source located a t a small hard chromium electroplating facility who chooses to meet the mass emission rate standard in §63.342(c)(2)(v) shall determine compliance by not allowing the mass rate of total chromium in the exhaust gas stream discharged to the atmosphere to exc eed the maximum allowable mass emission rate calculated using equation 10:

MAMER = ETSA × K × 0.03 mg/dscm. (10)

(B) Compliance with the alternative mass emission limit is demonstrated if the three

- run average mass emission rate determined from testing us ing Method 306 of appendix A to part 63 is less than or equal to the maximum allowable mass emission rate calculated from equation 10.

[60 FR 4963, Jan. 25, 1995, as amended at 61 FR 27787, June 3, 1996; 69 FR 42896, July 19, 2004]

§ 63.345 Provisions fo r new and reconstructed sources.

(a) This section identifies the preconstruction review requirements for new and reconstructed affected sources that are subject to, or become subject to, this subpart.

(b) New or reconstructed affected sources. The owner or operator of a new or reconstructed affected source is subject to §63.5(a), (b)(1), (b)(5), (b)(6), and (f)(1), as well as the provisions of this paragraph.

(1) After January 25, 1995, whether or not an approved permit program is effective in the State in which an affected source is (or would be) located, no person may construct a new affected source or reconstruct an affected source subject to this subpart, or reconstruct a source such that it becomes an affected source subject to this subpart, without sub mitting a notification of construction or reconstruction to the Administrator. The notification shall contain the information identified in paragraphs (b) (2) and (3) of this section, as appropriate.

(2) The notification of construction or reconstruction r equired under paragraph (b)(1) of this section shall include:

(i) The owner or operator's name, title, and address;KYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Page 21 of 35 Franklin , Indiana M 0 81

- 30224

- 00 015 Reviewer: Janet Mobley

(ii) The address (i.e., physical location) or proposed address of the affected source if different from the owner's or operator's;

(iii) A n otification of intention to construct a new affected source or make any physical or operational changes to an affected source that may meet or has been determined to meet the criteria for a reconstruction as defined in §63.2;

(iv) An identification of subp art N of this part as the basis for the notification;

(v) The expected commencement and completion dates of the construction or reconstruction;

(vi) The anticipated date of (initial) startup of the affected source;

(vii) The type of process operation to be performed (hard or decorative chromium electroplating, or chromium anodizing);

(viii) A description of the air pollution control technique to be used to control emissions from the affected source, such as preliminary design drawings and design capacity if an add

- on air pollution control device is used; and

(ix) An estimate of emissions from the source based on engineering calculations and vendor information on control device efficiency, expressed in units consistent with the emission limits of this subpart . Calculations of emission estimates should be in sufficient detail to permit assessment of the validity of the calculations.

(3) If a reconstruction is to occur, the notification required under paragraph (b)(1) of this section shall include the following in addition to the information required in paragraph (b)(2) of this section:

(i) A brief description of the affected source and the components to be replaced;

(ii) A brief description of the present and proposed emission control technique, including the in formation required by paragraphs (b)(2) (viii) and (ix) of this section;

(iii) An estimate of the fixed capital cost of the replacements and of constructing a comparable entirely new source;

(iv) The estimated life of the affected source after the replacem ents; and

(v) A discussion of any economic or technical limitations the source may have in complying with relevant standards or other requirements after the proposed replacements. The discussion shall be sufficiently detailed to demonstrate to the Administ rator's satisfaction that the technical or economic limitations affect the source's ability to comply with the relevant standard and how they do so.

(vi) If in the notification of reconstruction, the owner or operator designates the affected source as a re constructed source and declares that there are no economic or technical limitations to prevent the source from complying with all relevant standards or requirements, the owner or operator need not submit the information required in paragraphs (b)(3) (iii) through (v) of this section.

(4) The owner or operator of a new or reconstructed affected source that submits a notification in accordance with paragraphs (b) (1) through (3) of this section is not subject to approval by the Administrator. Construction or reconstruction is subject only to notification and can begin upon submission of a complete notification.

(5) Submittal timeframes. After January 25, 1995, whether or not an approved permit program is effective in the State in which an affected source is (o r would be) located, an owner or operator of a new or reconstructed affected source shall submit the notification of construction or reconstruction required by paragraph (b)(1) of this section according to the following schedule:

(i) If construction or rec onstruction commences after January 25, 1995, the notification shall be submitted as soon as practicable before the construction or reconstruction is planned to commence.KYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Page 22 of 35 Franklin , Indiana M 0 81

- 30224

- 00 015 Reviewer: Janet Mobley

(ii) If the construction or reconstruction had commenced and initial startup had not occurred before January 25, 1995, the notification shall be submitted as soon as practicable before startup but no later than 60 days after January 25,
1995.

§ 63.346 Recordkeeping requirements.

(a) The owner or operator of each affected source subject t o these standards shall fulfill all recordkeeping requirements outlined in this section and in the General Provisions to 40 CFR part 63, according to the applicability of subpart A of this part as identified in Table 1 of this subpart.

(b) The owner or ope rator of an affected source subject to the provisions of this subpart shall maintain the following records for such source:

(1) Inspection records for the add

- on air pollution control device, if such a device is used, and monitoring equipment, to document that the inspection and maintenance required by the work practice standards of §63.342(f) and Table 1 of §63.342 have taken place. The record can take the form of a checklist and should identify the device inspected, the date of inspection, a brief descrip tion of the working condition of the device during the inspection, and any actions taken to correct deficiencies found during the inspection.

(2) Records of all maintenance performed on the affected source, the add

- on air pollution control device, and moni toring equipment;

(3) Records of the occurrence, duration, and cause (if known) of each malfunction of process, add

- on air pollution control, and monitoring equipment;

(4) Records of actions taken during periods of malfunction when such actions are inconsi stent with the operation and maintenance plan;

(5) Other records, which may take the form of checklists, necessary to demonstrate consistency with the provisions of the operation and maintenance plan required by §63.342(f)(3);

(6) Test reports documenting results of all performance tests;

(7) All measurements as may be necessary to determine the conditions of performance tests, including measurements necessary to determine compliance with the special compliance procedures of §63.344(e);

(8) Records of monit oring data required by §63.343(c) that are used to demonstrate compliance with the standard including the date and time the data are collected;

(9) The specific identification (i.e., the date and time of commencement and completion) of each period of exces s emissions, as indicated by monitoring data, that occurs during malfunction of the process, add

- on air pollution control, or monitoring equipment;

(10) The specific identification (i.e., the date and time of commencement and completion) of each period of excess emissions, as indicated by monitoring data, that occurs during periods other than malfunction of the process, add

- on air pollution control, or monitoring equipment;

(11) The total process operating time of the affected source during the reporting pe riod;

(12) Records of the actual cumulative rectifier capacity of hard chromium electroplating tanks at a facility expended during each month of the reporting period, and the total capacity expended to date for a reporting period, if the owner or operator is using the actual cumulative rectifier capacity to determine facility size in accordance with §63.342(c)(2);

(13) For sources using fume suppressants to comply with the standards, records of the date and time that fume suppressants are added to the elect roplating or anodizing bath;KYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Page 23 of 35 Franklin , Indiana M 0 81

- 30224

- 00 015 Reviewer: Janet Mobley

(14) For sources complying with §63.342(e), records of the bath components purchased, with the wetting agent clearly identified as a bath constituent contained in one of the components;

(15) Any information demonstrating whethe r a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of recordkeeping or reporting requirements, if the source has been granted a waiver under §63.10(f); and

(16) All documentation supporting the notifications and reports required by §63.9, §63.10, and §63. 347.

(c) All records shall be maintained for a period of 5 years in accordance with §63.10(b)(1).

§ 63.347 Reporting requirements.

(a) The owner or operator of each affected source subject to these standards shall fulfill all reporting requirements outli ned in this section and in the General Provisions to 40 CFR part 63, according to the applicability of subpart A as identified in Table 1 of this subpart. These reports shall be made to the Administrator at the appropriate address as identified in §63.13 o r to the delegated State authority.

(1) Reports required by subpart A of this part and this section may be sent by U.S. mail, fax, or by another courier.

(i) Submittals sent by U.S. mail shall be postmarked on or before the specified date.

(ii) Submittals sent by other methods shall be received by the Administrator on or before the specified date.

(2) If acceptable to both the Administrator and the owner or operator of an affected source, reports may be submitted on electronic media.

(b) The reporting requi rements of this section apply to the owner or operator of an affected source when such source becomes subject to the provisions of this subpart.

(c) Initial notifications. (1) The owner or operator of an affected source that has an initial startup before J anuary 25, 1995, shall notify the Administrator in writing that the source is subject to this subpart. The notification shall be submitted no later than 180 calendar days after January 25, 1995, and shall contain the following information:

(i) The name, ti tle, and address of the owner or operator;

(ii) The address (i.e., physical location) of each affected source;

(iii) A statement that subpart N of this part is the basis for this notification;

(iv) Identification of the applicable emission limitation and c ompliance date for each affected source;

(v) A brief description of each affected source, including the type of process operation performed;

(vi) For sources performing hard chromium electroplating, the maximum potential cumulative potential rectifier
capa city;

(vii) For sources performing hard chromium electroplating, a statement of whether the affected source(s) is located at a small or a large, hard chromium electroplating facility and whether this will be demonstrated through actual or maximum potential cumulative rectifier capacity;

(viii) For sources performing hard chromium electroplating, a statement of whether the owner or operator of an affected source(s) will limit the maximum potential cumulative rectifier capacity in accordance with §63.342(c)(2 ) such that the hard chromium electroplating facility is considered small; andKYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Page 24 of 35 Franklin , Indiana M 0 81

- 30224

- 00 015 Reviewer: Janet Mobley

(ix) A statement of whether the affected source is located at a major source or an area source as defined in §63.2.

(2) The owner or operator of a new or reconstructed affected source that has an initial startup after January 25, 1995 shall submit an initial notification (in addition to the notification of construction or reconstruction required by §63.345(b) as follows:

(i) A notification of the date when construction or reconst ruction was commenced, shall be submitted simultaneously with the notification of construction or reconstruction, if construction or reconstruction was commenced before January 25, 1995;

(ii) A notification of the date when construction or reconstruction w as commenced, shall be submitted no later than 30 calendar days after such date, if construction or reconstruction was commenced after January 25, 1995; and

(iii) A notification of the actual date of startup of the source shall be submitted within 30 calen dar days after such date.

(d) Notification of performance test. (1) The owner or operator of an affected source shall notify the Administrator in writing of his or her intention to conduct a performance test at least 60 calendar days before the test is sch eduled to begin to allow the Administrator to have an observer present during the test. Observation of the performance test by the Administrator is optional.

(2) In the event the owner or operator is unable to conduct the performance test as scheduled, the provisions of §63.7(b)(2) apply.

(e) Notification of compliance status. (1) A notification of compliance status is required each time that an affected source becomes subject to the requirements of this subpart.

(2) If the State in which the source is loca ted has not been delegated the authority to implement the rule, each time a notification of compliance status is required under this part, the owner or operator of an affected source shall submit to the Administrator a notification of compliance status, si gned by the responsible official (as defined in §63.2) who shall certify its accuracy, attesting to whether the affected source has complied with this subpart. If the State has been delegated the authority, the notification of compliance status shall be su bmitted to the appropriate authority. The notification shall list for each affected source:

(i) The applicable emission limitation and the methods that were used to determine compliance with this limitation;

(ii) If a performance test is required by this s ubpart, the test report documenting the results of the performance test, which contains the elements required by §63.344(a), including measurements and calculations to support the special compliance provisions of §63.344(e) if these are being followed;

(ii i) The type and quantity of hazardous air pollutants emitted by the source reported in mg/dscm or mg/hr if the source is using the special provisions of §63.344(e) to comply with the standards. (If the owner or operator is subject to the construction and r econstruction provisions of §63.345 and had previously submitted emission estimates, the owner or operator shall state that this report corrects or verifies the previous estimate.) For sources not required to conduct a performance test in accordance with § 63.343(b), the surface tension measurement may fulfill this requirement;

(iv) For each monitored parameter for which a compliant value is to be established under §63.343(c), the specific operating parameter value, or range of values, that corresponds to co mpliance with the applicable emission limit;

(v) The methods that will be used to determine continuous compliance, including a description of monitoring and reporting requirements, if methods differ from those identified in this subpart;

(vi) A description of the air pollution control technique for each emission point;KYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Page 25 of 35 Franklin , Indiana M 0 81

- 30224

- 00 015 Reviewer: Janet Mobley

(vii) A statement that the owner or operator has completed and has on file the operation and maintenance plan as required by the work practice standards in §63.342(f);

(viii) If the owner or operator is determining facility size based on actual cumulative rectifier capacity in accordance with §63.342(c)(2), records to support that the facility is small. For existing sources, records from any 12

- month period preceding the compliance date shall be used or a description of how operations will change to meet a small designation shall be provided. For new sources, records of projected rectifier capacity for the first 12

- month period of tank operation shall be used;

(ix) A statement by the owner or o perator of the affected source as to whether the source has complied with the provisions of this subpart.

(3) For sources required to conduct a performance test by §63.343(b), the notification of compliance status shall be submitted to the Administrator no later than 90 calendar days following completion of the compliance demonstration required by §63.7 and §63.343(b).

(4) For sources that are not required to complete a performance test in accordance with §63.343(b), the notification of compliance status sh all be submitted to the Administrator no later than 30 days after the compliance date specified in §63.343(a), except the date on which sources in California shall monitor the surface tension of the anodizing bath is extended to January 25, 1998.

(f) Repor ts of performance test results. (1) If the State in which the source is located has not been delegated the authority to implement the rule, the owner or operator of an affected source shall report to the Administrator the results of any performance test co nducted as required by §63.7 or §63.343(b). If the State has been delegated the authority, the owner or operator of an affected source should report performance test results to the appropriate authority.

(2) Reports of performance test results shall be sub mitted no later than 90 days following the completion of the performance test, and shall be submitted as part of the notification of compliance status required by paragraph (e) of this section.

(g) Ongoing compliance status reports for major sources. (1) T he owner or operator of an affected source that is located at a major source site shall submit a summary report to the Administrator to document the ongoing compliance status of the affected source. The report shall contain the information identified in pa ragraph (g)(3) of this section, and shall be submitted semiannually except when:

(i) The Administrator determines on a case

- by

- case basis that more frequent reporting is necessary to accurately assess the compliance status of the source; or

(ii) The monito ring data collected by the owner or operator of the affected source in accordance with §63.343(c) show that the emission limit has been exceeded, in which case quarterly reports shall be submitted. Once an owner or operator of an affected source reports an exceedance, ongoing compliance status reports shall be submitted quarterly until a request to reduce reporting frequency under paragraph (g)(2) of this section is approved.

(2) Request to reduce frequency of ongoing compliance status reports. (i) An owner or operator who is required to submit ongoing compliance status reports on a quarterly (or more frequent basis) may reduce the frequency of reporting to semiannual if all of the following conditions are met:

(A) For 1 full year (e.g., 4 quarterly or 12 mo nthly reporting periods), the ongoing compliance status reports demonstrate that the affected source is in compliance with the relevant emission limit;

(B) The owner or operator continues to comply with all applicable recordkeeping and monitoring requireme nts of subpart A of this part and this subpart; and

(C) The Administrator does not object to a reduced reporting frequency for the affected source, as provided in paragraphs (g)(2) (ii) and (iii) of this section.KYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Page 26 of 35 Franklin , Indiana M 0 81

- 30224

- 00 015 Reviewer: Janet Mobley

(ii) The frequency of submitting ongoing co mpliance status reports may be reduced only after the owner or operator notifies the Administrator in writing of his or her intention to make such a change, and the Administrator does not object to the intended change. In deciding whether to approve a redu ced reporting frequency, the Administrator may review information concerning the source's entire previous performance history during the 5

- year recordkeeping period prior to the intended change, or the recordkeeping period since the source's compliance dat e, whichever is shorter. Records subject to review may include performance test results, monitoring data, and evaluations of an owner or operator's conformance with emission limitations and work practice standards. Such information may be used by the Admin istrator to make a judgment about the source's potential for noncompliance in the future. If the Administrator disapproves the owner or operator's request to reduce reporting frequency, the Administrator will notify the owner or operator in writing within 45 days after receiving notice of the owner or operator's intention. The notification from the Administrator to the owner or operator will specify the grounds on which the disapproval is based. In the absence of a notice of disapproval within 45 days, appr oval is automatically granted.

(iii) As soon as the monitoring data required by §63.343(c) show that the source is not in compliance with the relevant emission limit, the frequency of reporting shall revert to quarterly, and the owner shall state this exce edance in the ongoing compliance status report for the next reporting period. After demonstrating ongoing compliance with the relevant emission limit for another full year, the owner or operator may again request approval from the Administrator to reduce t he reporting frequency as allowed by paragraph (g)(2) of this section.

(3) Contents of ongoing compliance status reports. The owner or operator of an affected source for which compliance monitoring is required in accordance with §63.343(c) shall prepare a summary report to document the ongoing compliance status of the source. The report must contain the following information:

(i) The company name and address of the affected source;

(ii) An identification of the operating parameter that is monitored for comp liance determination, as required by §63.343(c);

(iii) The relevant emission limitation for the affected source, and the operating parameter value, or range of values, that correspond to compliance with this emission limitation as specified in the notifica tion of compliance status required by paragraph (e) of this section;

(iv) The beginning and ending dates of the reporting period;

(v) A description of the type of process performed in the affected source;

(vi) The total operating time of the affected sourc e during the reporting period;

(vii) If the affected source is a hard chromium electroplating tank and the owner or operator is limiting the maximum cumulative rectifier capacity in accordance with §63.342(c)(2), the actual cumulative rectifier capacity ex pended during the reporting period, on a month

- by

- month basis;

(viii) A summary of operating parameter values, including the total duration of excess emissions during the reporting period as indicated by those values, the total duration of excess emissions expressed as a percent of the total source operating time during that reporting period, and a breakdown of the total duration of excess emissions during the reporting period into those that are due to process upsets, control equipment malfunctions, other known causes, and unknown causes;

(ix) A certification by a responsible official, as defined in §63.2, that the work practice standards in §63.342(f) were followed in accordance with the operation and maintenance plan for the source;

(x) If the operation a nd maintenance plan required by §63.342(f)(3) was not followed, an explanation of the reasons for not following the provisions, an assessment of whether any excess emission and/or parameter monitoring exceedances are believed to have occurred, and a copy o f the report(s) required by §63.342(f)(3)(iv) documenting that the operation and maintenance plan was not followed;

(xi) A description of any changes in monitoring, processes, or controls since the last reporting period;KYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Page 27 of 35 Franklin , Indiana M 0 81

- 30224

- 00 015 Reviewer: Janet Mobley

(xii) The name, title, and signatur e of the responsible official who is certifying the accuracy of the report; and

(xiii) The date of the report.

(4) When more than one monitoring device is used to comply with the continuous compliance monitoring required by §63.343(c), the owner or operato r shall report the results as required for each monitoring device. However, when one monitoring device is used as a backup for the primary monitoring device, the owner or operator shall only report the results from the monitoring device used to meet the mo nitoring requirements of this subpart. If both devices are used to meet these requirements, then the owner or operator shall report the results from each monitoring device for the relevant compliance period.

(h) Ongoing compliance status reports for area s ources. The requirements of this paragraph do not alleviate affected area sources from complying with the requirements of State or Federal operating permit programs under 40 CFR part
71.

(1) The owner or operator of an affected source that is located at an area source site shall prepare a summary report to document the ongoing compliance status of the affected source. The report shall contain the information identified in paragraph (g)(3) of this section, shall be completed annually and retained on site, an d made available to the Administrator upon request. The report shall be completed annually except as provided in paragraph (h)(2) of this section.

(2) Reports of exceedances. (i) If both of the following conditions are met, semiannual reports shall be prep ared and submitted to the Administrator:

(A) The total duration of excess emissions (as indicated by the monitoring data collected by the owner or operator of the affected source in accordance with §63.343(c)) is 1 percent or greater of the total operating time for the reporting period; and

(B) The total duration of malfunctions of the add

- on air pollution control device and monitoring equipment is 5 percent or greater of the total operating time.

(ii) Once an owner or operator of an affected source reports an exceedance as defined in paragraph (h)(2)(i) of this section, ongoing compliance status reports shall be submitted semiannually until a request to reduce reporting frequency under paragraph (h)(3) of this section is approved.

(iii) The Administrator ma y determine on a case

- by

- case basis that the summary report shall be completed more frequently and submitted, or that the annual report shall be submitted instead of being retained on site, if these measures are necessary to accurately assess the complianc e status of the source.

(3) Request to reduce frequency of ongoing compliance status reports. (i) An owner or operator who is required to submit ongoing compliance status reports on a semiannual (or more frequent) basis, or is required to submit its annual report instead of retaining it on site, may reduce the frequency of reporting to annual and/or be allowed to maintain the annual report onsite if all of the following conditions are met:

(A) For 1 full year (e.g., 2 semiannual or 4 quarterly reporting per iods), the ongoing compliance status reports demonstrate that the affected source is in compliance with the relevant emission limit;

(B) The owner or operator continues to comply with all applicable recordkeeping and monitoring requirements of subpart A of this part and this subpart; and

(C) The Administrator does not object to a reduced reporting frequency for the affected source, as provided in paragraphs (h)(3) (ii) and (iii) of this section.

(ii) The frequency of submitting ongoing compliance status rep orts may be reduced only after the owner or operator notifies the Administrator in writing of his or her intention to make such a change, and the Administrator does not object to the intended change. In deciding whether to approve a reduced reporting frequ ency, the Administrator may review information concerning the source's previous performance history during the 5

- year recordkeeping period priorKYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Page 28 of 35 Franklin , Indiana M 0 81

- 30224

- 00 015 Reviewer: Janet Mobley

to the intended change, or the recordkeeping period since the source's compliance date, whichever is shorter. R ecords subject to review may include performance test results, monitoring data, and evaluations of an owner or operator's conformance with emission limitations and work practice standards. Such information may be used by the Administrator to make a judgeme nt about the source's potential for noncompliance in the future. If the Administrator disapproves the owner or operator's request to reduce reporting frequency, the Administrator will notify the owner or operator in writing within 45 days after receiving n otice of the owner or operator's intention. The notification from the Administrator to the owner or operator will specify the grounds on which the disapproval is based. In the absence of a notice of disapproval within 45 days, approval is automatically gra nted.

(iii) As soon as the monitoring data required by §63.343(c) show that the source is not in compliance with the relevant emission limit, the frequency of reporting shall revert to semiannual, and the owner shall state this exceedance in the ongoing co mpliance status report for the next reporting period. After demonstrating ongoing compliance with the relevant emission limit for another full year, the owner or operator may again request approval from the Administrator to reduce the reporting frequency a s allowed by paragraph (h)(3) of this section.

(i) Reports associated with trivalent chromium baths. The requirements of this paragraph do not alleviate affected sources from complying with the requirements of State or Federal operating permit programs und er title V. Owners or operators complying with the provisions of §63.342(e) are not subject to paragraphs (a) through (h) of this section, but must instead submit the following reports:

(1) Within 180 days after January 25, 1995, submit an initial notifica tion that includes:

(i) The same information as is required by paragraphs (c)(1) (i) through (v) of this section; and

(ii) A statement that a trivalent chromium process that incorporates a wetting agent will be used to comply with §63.342(e); and

(iii) The list of bath components that comprise the trivalent chromium bath, with the wetting agent clearly identified; and

(2) Within 30 days of the compliance date specified in §63.343(a), a notification of compliance status that contains an update of the informa tion submitted in accordance with paragraph (i)(1) of this section or a statement that the information is still accurate; and

(3) Within 30 days of a change to the trivalent chromium electroplating process, a report that includes:

(i) A description of the manner in which the process has been changed and the emission limitation, if any, now applicable to the affected source;

(ii) If a different emission limitation applies, the applicable information required by paragraph (c)(1) of this section; and

(iii) The notification and reporting requirements of paragraphs (d), (e), (f), (g), and (h) of this section, which shall be submitted in accordance with the schedules identified in those paragraphs.

[60 FR 4963, Jan. 25, 1995, as amended at 61 FR 27787, June 3, 199 6; 62 FR 4465, Jan. 30, 1997, 62 FR 42921, Aug. 11, 1997; 69 FR 42897, July 19, 2004]

§ 63.348 Implementation and enforcement.

(a) This subpart can be implemented and enforced by the U.S. EPA, or a delegated authority such as the applicable State, local, or Tribal agency. If the U.S. EPA Administrator has delegated authority to a State, local, or Tribal agency, then that agency, in addition to the U.S. EPA, has the authority to implement and enforce this subpart. Contact the applicable U.S. EPA Regional O ffice to find out if implementation and enforcement of this subpart is delegated to a State, local, or Tribal agency.KYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Page 29 of 35 Franklin , Indiana M 0 81

- 30224

- 00 015 Reviewer: Janet Mobley

(b) In delegating implementation and enforcement authority of this subpart to a State, local, or Tribal agency under subpart E of this par t, the authorities contained in paragraph (c) of this section are retained by the Administrator of U.S. EPA and cannot be transferred to the State, local, or Tribal agency.

(c) The authorities that cannot be delegated to State, local, or Tribal agencies ar e as specified in paragraphs (c)(1) through (4) of this section.

(1) Approval of alternatives to the requirements in §§63.340, 63.342(a) through (e) and (g), and 63.343(a).

(2) Approval of major alternatives to test methods under §63.7(e)(2)(ii) and (f), a s defined in §63.90, and as required in this subpart.

(3) Approval of major alternatives to monitoring under §63.8(f), as defined in §63.90, and as required in this subpart.

(4) Approval of major alternatives to recordkeeping and reporting under §63.10(f), as defined in §63.90, and as required in this subpart.

[68 FR 37347, June 23, 2003]

Table 1 to Subpart N of Part 63

— General Provisions Applicability to Subpart N

General provisions reference Applies to subpart N Comment

63.1(a)(1) Yes Additional terms de fined in §63.341; when overlap between subparts A and N occurs, subpart N takes precedence.

63.1(a)(2) Yes

63.1(a)(3) Yes

63.1(a)(4) Yes Subpart N clarifies the applicability of each paragraph in subpart A to sources subject to subpart N.

63.1(a)(6) Yes

63.1(a)(7) Yes

63.1(a)(8) Yes

63.1(a)(10) Yes

63.1(a)(11) Yes §63.347(a) of subpart N also allows report submissions via fax and on
electronic media.

63.1(a)(12)

– (14) Yes

63.1(b)(1) No §63.340 of subpart N specifies applicability.

63.1(b)(2 ) Yes

63.1(b)(3) No This provision in subpart A is being deleted. Also, all affected area and major sources are subject to subpart N; there are no exemptions.

63.1(c)(1) Yes Subpart N clarifies the applicability of each paragraph in subpart A to

sources subject to subpart N.KYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Page 30 of 35 Franklin , Indiana M 0 81

- 30224

- 00 015 Reviewer: Janet Mobley

63.1(c)(2) Yes §63.340(e) of Subpart N exempts area sources from the obligation to obtain Title V operating permits.

63.1(c)(4) Yes

63.1(c)(5) No Subpart N clarifies that an area source that becomes a major source is subject to t he requirements for major sources.

63.1(e) Yes

63.2 Yes Additional terms defined in §63.341; when overlap between subparts A and N occurs, subpart N takes precedence.

63.3 Yes Other units used in subpart N are defined in that subpart.

63.4 Yes

63.5( a) Yes Except replace the term “source” and “stationary source” in §63.5(a) (1) and (2) of subpart A with “affected sources.”

63.5(b)(1) Yes

63.5(b)(3) Yes Applies only to major affected sources.

63.5(b)(4) No Subpart N (§63.345) specifies requirements for the notification of construction or reconstruction for affected sources that are not major.

63.5(b)(5) Yes

63.5(b)(6) Yes

63.5(d)(1)(i) No §63.345(c)(5) of subpart N specifies when the application or notification
shall be submitted.

63.5(d)(1)(i i) Yes Applies to major affected sources that are new or reconstructed.

63.5(d)(1)(iii) Yes Except information should be submitted with the Notification of Compliance Status required by §63.347(e) of subpart N.

63.5(d)(2) Yes Applies to major affected so urces that are new or reconstructed except: (1) replace “source” in §63.5(d)(2) of subpart A with “affected source”; and (2) actual control efficiencies are submitted with the Notification of Compliance Status required by §63.347(e).

63.5(d)(3)

– (4) Yes Ap plies to major affected sources that are new or reconstructed.

63.5(e) Yes Applies to major affected sources that are new or reconstructed.

63.5(f)(1) Yes Except replace “source” in §63.5(f)(1) of subpart A with “affected source.”

63.5(f)(2) No New or r econstructed affected sources shall submit the request for approval of construction or reconstruction under §63.5(f) of subpart A by the deadline specified in §63.345(c)(5) of subpart N.

63.6(a) Yes

63.6(b)(1)

– (2) Yes Except replace “source” in §63.6(b) (1)

– (2) of part A with “affected source.”

63.6(b)(3)

– (4) YesKYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Page 31 of 35 Franklin , Indiana M 0 81

- 30224

- 00 015 Reviewer: Janet Mobley

63.6(b)(5) Yes Except replace “source” in §63.6(b)(5) of subpart A with “affected source.”

63.6(b)(7) No Provisions for new area sources that become major sources are contained in §63.343(a)( 4) of subpart N.

63.6(c)(1)

– (2) Yes Except replace “source” in §63.6(c)(1)

– (2) of subpart A with “affected source.”

63.6(c)(5) No Compliance provisions for existing area sources that become major sources are contained in §63.343(a)(3) of subpart N.

63.6 (e) No §63.342(f) of subpart N contains work practice standards (operation and maintenance requirements) that override these provisions.

63.6(f)(1) No §63.342(b) of subpart N specifies when the standards apply.

63.6(f)(2)(i)

– (ii) Yes

63.6(f)(2)(iii) No §63.344(b) of subpart N specifies instances in which previous performance test results for existing sources are acceptable.

63.6(f)(2)(iv) Yes

63.6(f)(2)(v) Yes

63.6(f)(3) Yes

63.6(g) Yes

63.6(h) No Subpart N does not contain any opacity or visib le emission standards.

63.6(i)(1) Yes

63.6(i)(2) Yes Except replace “source” in §63.6(i)(2)(i) and (ii) of subpart A with “affected
source.”

63.6(i)(3) Yes

63.6(i)(4)(i) No §63.343(a)(6) of subpart N specifies the procedures for obtaining an
extensio n of compliance and the date by which such requests must be submitted.

63.6(i)(4)(ii) Yes

63.6(i)(5) Yes

63.6(i)(6)(i) Yes This paragraph only references “paragraph (i)(4) of this section” for compliance extension provisions. But, §63.343(a)(6) of sub part N also contains provisions for requesting a compliance extension.

63.6(i)(6)(ii) Yes

63.6(i)(7) Yes

63.6(i)(8) Yes This paragraph only references “paragraphs (i)(4) through (i)(6) of this section” for compliance extension provisions. But, §63.343 (a)(6) of subpart N also contains provisions for requesting a compliance extension.

63.6(i)(9) Yes This paragraph only references “paragraphs (i)(4) through (i)(6) of thisKYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Page 32 of 35 Franklin , Indiana M 0 81

- 30224

- 00 015 Reviewer: Janet Mobley

section” and “paragraphs (i)(4) and (i)(5) of this section” for compliance extensio n provisions. But, §63.343(a)(6) of subpart N also contains provisions for requesting a compliance extension.

63.6(i)(10)(i)

– (iv) Yes

63.6(i)(10)(v)(A) Yes This paragraph only references “paragraph (i)(4)” for compliance extension provisions. But, §63.3 43(a)(6) of subpart N also contains provisions for requesting a compliance extension.

63.6(i)(10)(v)(B) Yes

63.6(i)(11) Yes

63.6(i)(12)(i) Yes This paragraph only references “paragraph (i)(4)(i) or (i)(5) of this section” for compliance extension prov isions. But, §63.343(a)(6) of subpart N also contains provisions for requesting a compliance extension.

63.6(i)(12)(ii)

– (iii) Yes

63.6(i)(13) Yes

63.6(i)(14) Yes

63.6(i)(16) Yes

63.6(j) Yes

63.7(a)(1) Yes

63.7(a)(2)(i)

– (vi) Yes

63.7(a)(2)(ix ) Yes

63.7(a)(3) Yes

63.7(b)(1) No §63.347(d) of subpart N requires notification prior to the performance test. §63.344(a) of subpart N requires submission of a site

- specific test plan upon request.

63.7(b)(2) Yes

63.7(c) No §63.344(a) of subpart N specifies what the test plan should contain, but does not require test plan approval or performance audit samples.

63.7(d) Yes Except replace “source” in the first sentence of §63.7(d) of subpart A with “affected source.”

63.7(e) Yes Subpart N also conta ins test methods specific to affected sources covered by that subpart.

63.7(f) Yes §63.344(c)(2) of subpart N identifies CARB Method 425 as acceptable
under certain conditions.

63.7(g)(1) No Subpart N identifies the items to be reported in the compliance test [§63.344(a)] and the timeframe for submitting the results [§63.347(f)].

63.7(g)(3) YesKYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Page 33 of 35 Franklin , Indiana M 0 81

- 30224

- 00 015 Reviewer: Janet Mobley

63.7(h)(1)

– (2) Yes

63.7(h)(3)(i) Yes This paragraph only references “§63.6(i)” for compliance extension provisions. But, §63.343(a)(6) of subpart N also conta ins provisions for requesting a compliance extension.

63.7(h)(3)(ii)

– (iii) Yes

63.7(h)(4)

– (5) Yes

63.8(a)(1) Yes

63.8(a)(2) No Work practice standards are contained in §63.342(f) of subpart N.

63.8(a)(4) No

63.8(b)(1) Yes

63.8(b)(2) No §63.344( d) of subpart N specifies the monitoring location when there are multiple sources.

63.8(b)(3) No §63.347(g)(4) of subpart N identifies reporting requirements when multiple
monitors are used.

63.8(c)(1)(i) No Subpart N requires proper maintenance of monit oring devices expected to be used by sources subject to subpart N.

63.8(c)(1)(ii) No §63.342(f)(3)(iv) of subpart N specifies reporting when the O&M plan is not followed.

63.8(c)(1)(iii) No §63.343(f)(2) identifies the criteria for whether O&M procedures are acceptable.

63.8(c)(2)

– (3) No §63.344(d)(2) requires appropriate use of monitoring devices.

63.8(c)(4)

– (7) No

63.8(d) No Maintenance of monitoring devices is required by §§63.342(f) and 63.344(d)(2) of subpart N.

63.8(e) No There are no performan ce evaluation procedures for the monitoring devices expected to be used to comply with subpart N.

63.8(f)(1) Yes

63.8(f)(2) No Instances in which the Administrator may approve alternatives to the monitoring methods and procedures of subpart N are contai ned in §63.343(c)(8) of subpart N.

63.8(f)(3) Yes

63.8(f)(4) Yes

63.8(f)(5) Yes

63.8(f)(6) No Subpart N does not require the use of CEM's.

63.8(g) No Monitoring data does not need to be reduced for reporting purposes because subpart N requires meas urement once/day.KYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Page 34 of 35 Franklin , Indiana M 0 81

- 30224

- 00 015 Reviewer: Janet Mobley

63.9(a) Yes

63.9(b)(1)(i)

– (ii) No §63.343(a)(3) of subpart N requires area sources to comply with major source provisions if an increase in HAP emissions causes them to become major sources.

63.9(b)(1)(iii) No §63.347(c)(2) of subpart N specifies initial notification requirements for new or reconstructed affected sources.

63.9(b)(2) No §63.347(c)(1) of subpart N specifies the information to be contained in the initial notification.

63.9(b)(3) No §63.347(c)(2) of subpart N specifies n otification requirements for new or reconstructed sources that are not major affected sources.

63.9(b)(4) No

63.9(b)(5) No

63.9(c) Yes This paragraph only references “§63.6(i)(4) through §63.6(i)(6)” for compliance extension provisions. But, §63.343(a )(6) of subpart N also contains provisions for requesting a compliance extension. Subpart N provides a different timeframe for submitting the request than §63.6(i)(4).

63.9(d) Yes This paragraph only references “the notification dates established in
parag raph (g) of this section.” But, §63.347 of subpart N also contains notification dates.

63.9(e) No Notification of performance test is required by §63.347(d) of subpart N.

63.9(f) No

63.9(g) No Subpart N does not require a performance evaluation or rela tive accuracy test for monitoring devices.

63.9(h)(1)

– (3) No §63.347(e) of subpart N specifies information to be contained in the notification of compliance status and the timeframe for submitting this information.

63.9(h)(5) No Similar language has been incorporated into §63.347(e)(2)(iii) of subpart N.

63.9(h)(6) Yes

63.9(i) Yes

63.9(j) Yes

63.10(a) Yes

63.10(b)(1) Yes

63.10(b)(2) No §63.346(b) of subpart N specifies the records that must be maintained.

63.10(b)(3) No Subpart N applies to ma jor and area sources.

63.10(c) No Applicable requirements of §63.10(c) have been incorporated into §63.346(b) of subpart N.KYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Page 35 of 35 Franklin , Indiana M 0 81

- 30224

- 00 015 Reviewer: Janet Mobley

63.10(d)(1) Yes

63.10(d)(2) No §63.347(f) of subpart N specifies the timeframe for reporting performance
test results.

63.10(d) (3) No Subpart N does not contain opacity or visible emissions standards.

63.10(d)(4) Yes

63.10(d)(5) No §63.342(f)(3)(iv) and §63.347(g)(3) of subpart N specify reporting associated with malfunctions.

63.10(e) No §63.347(g) and (h) of subpart N specif y the frequency of periodic reports of monitoring data used to establish compliance. Applicable requirements of §63.10(e) have been incorporated into §63.347(g) and (h).

63.10(f) Yes

63.11 No Flares will not be used to comply with the emission limits.

63.12

– 63.15 Yes

[60 FR 4963, Jan. 25, 1995, as amended at 61 FR 27787, June 3, 1996; 70 FR 75345, Dec. 19, 2005]

Printed from the Federal Code of Regulations on January 3, 2011.KYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Second Notice Only Change No : 081

- 30224

- 00015 Page 2 of 27 Franklin , Indiana Change by: Janet Mobley M081

- 23686

- 00015 Permit Reviewer: ERG/SE



### TABLE OF CONTENTS

A. SOURCE SUMMARY

................................ ................................ ................................ ............................... 4 A.1 General Information [326 IAC 2

- 5.1

- 3(c)][326 IAC 2

- 6.1

- 4(a)]
A.2 Emission Units and Pollution Control Equipment Summary

B. GENERAL CONDITIONS

................................ ................................ ................................ ........................ 8
B.1 Definitions [326 IAC 2

- 1.1

- 1] B.2 Permit Term [326 IAC 2

- 6.1

- 7(a)][326 IAC 2

- 1.1

- 9.5][IC 13

- 15

- 3

- 6(a)] B.3 Term of Conditions [326 IAC 2

- 1.1

- 9.5]
B.4 Enforceability B.5 Severability B.6 Property Rights or Exclusive Privilege
B .7 Duty to Provide Information B.8 Annual Notification [326 IAC 2

- 6.1

- 5(a)(5)] B.9 Preventive Maintenance Plan [326 IAC 1

- 6

- 3] B.10 Prior Permits Superseded [326 IAC 2

- 1.1

- 9.5]
B.11 Termination of Right to Operate [326 IAC 2

- 6.1

- 7(a)]
B.12 Permit Renewal [326 IAC 2

- 6.1

- 7] B.13 Permit Amendment or Revision [326 IAC 2

- 5.1

- 3(e)(3)][326 IAC 2

- 6.1

- 6] B.14 Source Modification Requirement B.15 Inspection and Entry [326 IAC 2

- 5.1

- 3(e)(4)(B)][326 IAC 2

- 6.1

- 5(a)(4)][IC 13

- 14

- 2

- 2] [IC 13

- 17

- 3

- 2][IC 13

- 30

- 3

- 1] B.16 Transfer of Ownership or Operational Control [326 IAC 2

- 6.1

- 6]
B.17 Annual Fee Payment [326 IAC 2

- 1.1

- 7] B.18 Credible Evidence [326 IAC 1

- 1

- 6]

C. SOURCE OPERATION CONDITIONS

................................ ................................ ................................ .. 13

Emission Limitations and Sta ndards [326 IAC 2

- 6.1

- 5(a)(1)]

C.1 Particulate Emission Limitations For Processes with Process Weight Rates Less Than One Hundred (100) Pounds per Hour [326 IAC 6

- 3

- 2] C.2 Permit Revocation [326 IAC 2

- 1.1

- 9] C.3 Opacity [326 IAC 5

- 1] C.4 Open Burning [326 IAC 4

- 1] [IC 13

- 17

- 9] C.5 Incineration [326 IAC 4

- 2] [326 IAC 9

- 1

- 2] C.6 Fugitive Dust Emissions [326 IAC 6

- 4] C.7 Asbestos Abatement Projects [326 IAC 14

- 10] [326 IAC 18] [40 CFR 61, Subpart M]

Testing Requirements [326 IAC 2

- 6.1

- 5(a)(2)] C.8 Pe rformance Testing [326 IAC 3

- 6]

Compliance Requirements [326 IAC 2

- 1.1

- 11] C.9 Compliance Requirements [326 IAC 2

- 1.1

- 11]

Compliance Monitoring Requirements [326 IAC 2

- 6.1

- 5(a)(2)] C.10 Compliance Monitoring [326 IAC 2

- 1.1

- 11] C.11 Instrument Specifi cations [326 IAC 2

- 1.1

- 11]

Corrective Actions and Response Steps C.12 Response to Excursions or Exceedances C.13 Actions Related to Noncompliance Demonstrated by a Stack TestKYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Second Notice Only Change No : 081

- 30224

- 00015 Page 3 of 27 Franklin , Indiana Change by: Janet Mobley M081

- 23686

- 00015 Permit Reviewer: ERG/SE

Record Keeping and Reporting Requirements [326 IAC 2

- 6.1

- 5(a)(2)]

C.14 Malfunc tions Report [326 IAC 1

- 6

- 2] C.15 General Record Keeping Requirements [326 IAC 2

- 6.1

- 5] C.16 General Reporting Requirements [326 IAC 2

- 1.1

- 11] [326 IAC 2

- 6.1

- 2] [IC 13

- 14

- 1

- 13]

D.1. EMISSIONS UNIT OPERATION CONDITIONS

................................ ................................ ................. 19

Emission Limitations and Standa rds [ 326 IAC 2

- 6. 1

- 5(a)(1)]
D.1.1 Particulate Emissions [326 IAC 6

- 3]
D.1.2 Preventive Ma intenance Plan [326 IAC 1

- 6

- 3]

Compliance Determination Requirements

D.1.3 Particulate Control

D. 2 . EMISSIONS UNIT OPERATION CONDITIONS

................................ ................................ ................. 21

Emission Limitations and Standard s [ 326 IAC 2

- 6. 1

- 5(a)(1)] D.2.1 Particulate Emissions [326 IAC 6

- 2]

D. 3 . EMISSIONS UNIT OPERATION CONDITIONS

................................ ................................ ................. 22

Emission Limitations and Standards [ 326 IAC 2

- 6. 1

- 5( a)(1)] D.3.1 Particulate Emissions [326 IAC 6

- 3]

E.1 National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) Requirements: Hard and Deco rative Chromium Electroplating and Chromium Anodizing Tanks [326 IAC 2 0

- 8 ]

.................. 23

E.1.1 General Provisions Relating to National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants under 40 CFR Part 63 [326 IAC 20

- 1] [40 CFR Part 63, Subpart A]
E.1.2 National Em issions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Hard and Decorative Chromium Electroplating and Chromium Anodizing Tanks : Requirements [40 CFR Part 63, Subpart N ]

Annual Notification

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ...... 25 Malfunction Report

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ...... 26

Attachment A: National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Hard and Decorative Chromium Electroplating and Chromium Anodizing TanksKYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Second Notice Only Change No : 081

- 30224

- 00015 Page 4 of 27 Franklin , Indiana Change by: Janet Mobley M081

- 23686

- 00015 Permit Reviewer: ERG/SE

SECTION A S OURCE SUMMARY

This permit is based on information requested by the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM), Office of Air Quality (OAQ). The information describing the source contained in conditions A. 1 and A.2 is descriptive information and does not constitute enforceable conditions. However, the Permittee should be aware that a physical change or a change in the method of operation that may render this descriptive information obsolete or inaccurate m ay trigger requirements for the Permittee to obtain additional permits or seek modification of this permit pursuant to 326 IAC 2, or change other applicable requirements presented in the permit application.

A.1 General Information [ 326 IAC 2

- 5. 1

- 3(c)][ 326 IAC 2

- 6. 1

- 4(a)] The Permittee owns and operates a stationary hard chrome electroplating plant used to manufacture piston rods for automotive struts.

.

Source Address : 2625 North Morton

, Franklin , Indiana 46131 General Source Phone Number: 31 7

- 73 6

- 7774 SIC Code: 3710 County Location: Johnson Source Location Status: Attainment for all criteria pollutants Source Status: Minor Source Operating Permit Program
M inor Source, under PSD and Emission Offset Rules Minor Source, Section 112 of the Clean Air Act Not 1 of 28 Source Categories

A.2 Emission Units and Pollution Control Equipment Summary
This stationary source consists of the following emission units and pollution control devices:

(a) Four (4) chrome electroplating lines with open surface hard chrome electroplating tanks, using hexavalent chromium and with a cumulative rect ifier capacity of 882 million amp

hours per year (not including etch rectifiers) consisting of the following:

(1) One (1) hard chrome electroplating line (identified as P

- 1), constructed in 1997, consisting of seven (7) rectifiers: six (6) rectifiers wit h a maximum capacity of 6,000 amperes and one (1) etch rectifier with a maximum capacity of 4,000 amperes controlled by a composite wet mesh pad followed by three stage wet scrubber. This electroplating line has a maximum throughput capacity of 550 piston rods per hour. Emissions are exhausted through stack H300

- A. This electroplating tank is considered an existing large hard chromium electroplating tank under 40 CFR 63, Subpart N. [40 CFR 63, Subpart N]

(2) One (1) hard chrome electroplating line (ident ified as P

- 2), constructed in 1997, consisting of seven (7) rectifiers: six (6) rectifiers with a maximum capacity of 6,000 amperes and one (1) etch rectifier with a maximum capacity of 4,000 amperes controlled by a four

- stage wet scrubber where the first two stages are a wet packed bed followed by one stage of composite mesh pads and a final packed bed stage. This electroplating line has a maximum throughput capacity of 550 piston rods per hour. Emissions are exhausted through stack H200

- A. This electropl ating tank is considered an existing large hard chromium electroplating tank under 40 CFR 63, Subpart N. [40 CFR 63, Subpart N]

(3) One (1) hard chrome electroplating line (identified as P

- 3), constructed in 2002, consisting of seven (7) rectifiers: six (6) rectifiers with a maximum capacity of 6,000 amperes and one (1) etch rectifier with a maximum capacity of 4,000 amperes controlled by a three stage wet scrubber where the first stage is a wet
bed scrubber followed by two stages of composite mesh pads

. This electroplatingKYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Second Notice Only Change No : 081

- 30224

- 00015 Page 5 of 27 Franklin , Indiana Change by: Janet Mobley M081

- 23686

- 00015 Permit Reviewer: ERG/SE

line has a maximum throughput capacity of 1000 piston rods per hour. Emissions are exhausted through stack H400

- A. This electroplating tank is
considered a new large hard chromium electroplating tank under 40 CFR 63, Subpart N. [40 CFR 63, Subpart N]

(4) One (1) hard chrome electroplating line (identified as P

- 4), constructed in 2005, consisting of eight (8) rectifiers: seven (7) rectifiers with a maximum capacity of 6,000 amperes and one (1) etch rectifier with a maximum capacity of 4 ,000 amperes controlled by a three stage wet scrubber where the first stage is a wet bed scrubber followed by two stages of composite mesh pads . This electroplating line has a maximum throughput capacity of 1,350 piston rods per hour. Emissions are exhaust ed through stack H500

- A. This electroplating tank is considered a new large hard chromium electroplating tank under 40 CFR 63, Subpart N. [40 CFR 63, Subpart N]

(b) One (1) spray paint booth constructed after July 1, 1990 , identified as FA

- 10, using air atomization with particulate matter emissions controlled using dry filters. The maximum throughput capacity is 500 metal parts per year.

(c) One (1) touch

- up machine constructed after July 1, 1990, identified as FA

- 5, using a roller to apply coatings wit h a maximum throughput capacity of 200 metal parts per hour.

(d) Two (2) dip coating lines constructed after July 1, 1990 identified as E

- Coat 1 and E

- Coat 2, having maximum capacities of 500 metal parts per hour and 600 metal parts per hour respectively ; and one (1) dip coating line, constructed in 2005, identified as E

- Coat 3, having a maximum throughput capacity of 1,200 metal parts per hour.

(e) Five (5) natural gas

- fired boilers:

(1) E

- Coat 1 Process Boiler No. 1 (identified as EC1

- J300

- 22A), constructed in July 2007 having a maximum heat input capacity of 2.00 MMBtu/hour, exhausting through stack J300

- 22A; [326 IAC 6

- 2] Note: this unit replaced E

- Coat 1 Process Boiler No.1 constructed in June 1991 with a heat input capacity of 1.69 MMBtu/hour from the original MSOP 081

- 12622

- 0158.

(2) E

- Coat 1 Process Boiler No. 2 (identified as EC1

- J300

- 22B), constructed in July 2007 having a maximum heat input capacity of 2.00 MMBtu/hour, exhausting through stack J300

- 22B; [326 IAC 6

- 2] Note: this unit rep laced E

- Coat 1 Process Boiler No.2 constructed in June 1991 with a heat input capacity of 1.69 MMBtu/hour from the original MSOP 081

- 12622

- 0158.

(3 ) E

- Coat 3 P roce ss Boiler (identified as EC3

- Q300

- 23E), constructed in 2005 having a maximum heat input cap acity of 3.0 MMBtu/hr, exhausting through stack Q300

- 23E; [326 IAC 6

- 2]

(4) Space heating Boiler No. 1, constructed in June 1988, having a maximum heat input capacity of 10.461 MMBtu/hr, exhausting through stack L85090; [326 IAC 6

- 2] and

(5) Space hea ting Boiler No. 2, constructed in June 1988, having a maximum heat input capacity of 10.461 MMBtu/hr, exhausting through stack L85091. [326 IAC 6

- 2]KYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Second Notice Only Change No : 081

- 30224

- 00015 Page 6 of 27 Franklin , Indiana Change by: Janet Mobley M081

- 23686

- 00015 Permit Reviewer: ERG/SE

(f) Three (3) natural gas

- fired heaters and ovens:

(1) E

- Coat 1 Cure Oven (identified as EC1

- J300

- 2 2D) having a maximum heat input capacity of 1.59 MMBtu/hour, exhausting through stack J300

- 22D;

(2) E

- Coat 2 Cure Oven (identified as EC2

- P100

- 21D) having a maximum heat input capacity of 1.59 MMBtu/hour, exhausting through three (3) stacks P100

- 21D,
P1 00

- 21E and P100

- 21F;

(3 ) E

- Coat 3 Cure Oven (identified as EC3

- Q300

- 23D) having a maximum heat input capacity of 2.5 MMBtu/hour, exhausting through stack Q300

- 23D;

(g) Fifty (50) robotic MIG welding stations using baghouse fabric filters with a Torit Ca rtridge dust collector. The maximum throughput is 59.30 pounds of wire per hour. [326 IAC 6

- 3]

(h) Forty

- one (41) natural gas

- fired heating units installed March 1, 2007. None of these units have emissions control devices and all exhaust to the atmosp here.

(1) Eleven (11) 40

- ton roof top air conditioner units identified as RTU

- 1 each with a heat input rate of 0.26 MMBtu/hour.

(2) Two (2) 35

- ton roof top air conditioner units identified as RTU

- 2 each with a heat input rate of 0.27 MMBtu/hour.

(3) Eight (8) 30

- ton roof top air conditioner units identified as RTU

- 3 each with a heat input rate of 0.28 MMBtu/hour.

(4) One (1) 30

- ton roof top air conditioner unit identified as RTU

- 4 with a heat input rate of 0.28 MMBtu/hour.

(5) Two (2) 25

- ton ro of top air conditioner units identified as RTU

- 5 each with a heat input rate of 0.25 MMBtu/hour.

(6) Two (2) 7.5

- ton roof top air conditioner units identified as RTU

- 6 each with a heat input rate of 0.12 MMBtu/hour.

(7) One (1) 5

- ton roof top air condit ioner unit identified as RTU

- 7 with a heat input rate of 0.09 MMBtu/hour.

(8) Three (3) 3

- ton roof top air conditioner units identified as RTU

- 8 each with a heat input rate of 0.08 MMBtu/hour.

(9) Five (5) radiant heaters identified as RH

- 1 each with a heat input rate of 0.1 MMBtu/hour.

(10) Three (3) unit heaters identified as UH

- 1 each with a heat input rate of 0.05 MMBtu/hour.

(11) Two (2), fifty thousand (50,000) CFM make up air units identified as MAU

- 1 each with a heat input rate of 4. 91 MMBtu/hour.

(12) One (1) fifty thousand (50,000) CFM make up air unit identified as MAU

- 2 with a heat input rate of 4.91 MMBtu/hour.KYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Second Notice Only Change No : 081

- 30224

- 00015 Page 7 of 27 Franklin , Indiana Change by: Janet Mobley M081

- 23686

- 00015 Permit Reviewer: ERG/SE

(i) One (1) gas fired process space heater, identified as MAU

- 1 A , approved for construction in 2011, with a m aximum heat input rate of 1.70 MMBtu/hr, with no control, and exhausting to the atmosphere.

(j) Two (2) gas fired door make up process space heaters, identified as UH

- 1 A and UH

- 2, approved for construction in 2011, with a maximum heat input rate o f 0.15 MMBtu/hr each, with no control, exhausting to the atmosphere.KYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Second Notice Only Change No : 081

- 30224

- 00015 Page 8 of 27 Franklin , Indiana Change by: Janet Mobley M081

- 23686

- 00015 Permit Reviewer: ERG/SE

SECTION B GENERAL CONDITIONS

B.1 Definitions [ 326 IAC 2

- 1. 1

- 1] Terms in this permi t shall have the definition assigned to such terms in the referenced regulation. In the absence of definitions in the referenced regulation, the applicable definitions found in the statutes or regulations ( IC 13

- 11, 326 IAC 1

- 2 and 326 IAC 2

- 1. 1

- 1 ) shall prevail.

B.2 Permit Term [ 326 IAC 2

- 6. 1

- 7(a)][ 326 IAC 2

- 1. 1

- 9.5][ IC 13

- 1 5

- 3

- 6(a)] (a) This permit, M08 1

- 2368 6

- 00015

, is issued for a fixed term of ten (10) y ears from the issuance date of this permit, as determined in accordance with IC 4

- 21. 5

- 3

- 5(f) and IC 13

- 1 5

- 5

- 3. Subsequent revisions, modifications, or amendments of this permit do not affect the expiration date of this permit.

(b) If IDEM, OAQ , upon rec eiving a timely and complete renewal permit application, fails to issue or deny the permit renewal prior to the expiration date of this permit, this existing permit shall not expire and all terms and conditions shall continue in effect

, until the renewal p ermit has been issued or denied.

B.3 Term of Conditions [ 326 IAC 2

- 1. 1

- 9.5] Notwithstanding the permit term of a permit to construct, a permit to operate, or a permit modification, any con dition established in a permit issued pursuant to a permitting program approved in the state implementation plan shall remain in effect until:

(a) the condition is modified in a subsequent permit action pursuant to Title I of the Clean Air Act; or

(b) t he emission unit to which the condition pertains permanently ceases operation.

B.4 Enforceability Unless otherwise stated, all terms and conditions in this permit, including any provisions designed to limit the source's potential to emit, are enforceable by IDEM, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) and by citizens in accordance with the Clean Air Act.

B.5 Severability The provisions of this perm it are severable; a determination that any portion of this permit is invalid shall not affect the validity of the remainder of the permit.

B.6 Property Rights or Exclusive Privilege
This permit does not convey any property rights of any sort or any exclusive privilege.

B.7 Duty to Provide Information (a) The Permittee shall furnish to IDEM, OAQ, within a reasonable time, any informa tion that IDEM, OAQ may request in writing to determine whether cause exists for modifying, revoking and reissuing, or terminating this permit, or to determine compliance with this permit. Upon request, the Permittee shall also furnish to IDEM, OAQ copies of records required to be kept by this permit.

(b) For information furnished by the Permittee to IDEM, OAQ, the Permittee may include a claim of confidentiality in accordance with 326 IAC 17.1. When furnishing copies of requested records directly to U. S . EPA, the Permittee may assert a claim of confidentiality in accordance with 40 CFR 2, Subpart B.KYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Second Notice Only Change No : 081

- 30224

- 00015 Page 9 of 27 Franklin , Indiana Change by: Janet Mobley M081

- 23686

- 00015 Permit Reviewer: ERG/SE

B.8 Annual Notification [ 326 IAC 2

- 6. 1

- 5(a)(5)] (a) An annual notification shall be submitted by an authorized individual to the Office of Air Quality stating whether or not the source is in operation and in compliance with the terms and conditions contained in this permit.

(b) The annual notice shall be submitted in the format attached no later than March 1 of each year to:

Indiana Department of Environmental Management Compliance and Enforcement Branch, Office of Air Quality 100 North Senate Avenue MC 6 1

- 53 IGCN 1003 Indianapolis, Indiana 4620 4

- 2251

(c) The notification shall be cons idered timely if the date postmarked on the envelope or certified mail receipt, or affixed by the shipper on the private shipping receipt, is on or before the date it is due. If the document is submitted by any other means, it shall be considered timely i f received by IDEM, OAQ on or before the date it is due.

B.9 Preventive Maintenance Plan [ 326 IAC 1

- 6

- 3] (a) A Preventive Maintenance Plan meets the requirements of 326 IAC 1

- 6

- 3 if i t includes, at a minimum:

(1) Identification of the individual(s) responsible for inspecting, maintaining, and repairing emission control devices;

(2) A description of the items or conditions that will be inspected and the inspection schedule for said it ems or conditions; and

(3) Identification and quantification of the replacement parts that will be maintained in inventory for quick replacement.

The Permittee shall implement the PMPs.

(b) If required by specific condition(s) in Section D of this permi t where no PMP was previously required, the Permittee shall prepare and maintain Preventive Maintenance Plans (PMPs) no later than ninety (90) days after issuance of this permit or ninety (90) days after initial start

- up, whichever is later, including the following information on each facility:

(1) Identification of the individual(s) responsible for inspecting, maintaining, and repairing emission control devices;

(2) A description of the items or conditions that will be inspected and the inspection schedu le for said items or conditions; and

(3) Identification and quantification of the replacement parts that will be maintained in inventory for quick replacement.

If, due to circumstances beyond the Permittee’s control, the PMPs cannot be prepared and maint ained within the above time frame, the Permittee may extend the date an additional ninety (90) days provided the Permittee notifies:

Indiana Department of Environmental Management Compliance and Enforcement Branch, Office of Air QualityKYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Second Notice Only Change No : 081

- 30224

- 00015 Page 10 of 27 Franklin , Indiana Change by: Janet Mobley M081

- 23686

- 00015 Permit Reviewer: ERG/SE

100 North Senate A venue MC 6 1

- 53 IGCN 1003 Indianapolis, Indiana 4620 4

- 2251

The Permittee shall implement the PMPs.

(c) A copy of the PMPs shall be submitted to IDEM, OAQ upon request and within a reasonable time, and shall be subject to review and approval by IDEM, OAQ

. IDEM, OAQ may require the Permittee to revise its PMPs whenever lack of proper maintenance causes or is the primary contributor to an exceedance of any limitation on emissions.

(d) To the extent the Permittee is required by 40 CFR Part 60/63 to have an O peration Maintenance, and Monitoring (OMM) Plan for a unit, such Plan is deemed to satisfy the PMP requirements of 326 IAC 1

- 6

- 3 for that unit.

B.10 Prior Permits Superseded [ 326 IAC 2

- 1. 1

- 9.5] (a) All terms and conditions of permits established prior to M08 1

- 2368 6

- 00015 and issued pursuant to permitting programs approved into the state implementation plan have been either:

(1) incorporated as originally stated,

(2) revised, or

(3) deleted.

(b) All previous registrations and permits are superseded by this permit.

B.11 Termination of Right to Operate [ 326 IAC 2

- 6. 1

- 7(a)] The Permittee's right to opera te this source terminates with the expiration of this permit unless a timely and complete renewal application is submitted at least one hundred twenty (120) days prior to the date of expiration of the source’s existing permit, consistent with 326 IAC 2

- 6. 1

- 7

.

B.12 Permit Renewal [ 326 IAC 2

- 6. 1

- 7] (a) The application for renewal shall be submitted using the application form or forms prescribed by IDEM, OAQ and shall include the information speci fied in 326 IAC 2

- 6. 1

- 7

. Such information shall be included in the application for each emission unit at this source

. The renewal application does require an affirmation that the statements in the application are true and complete by an "authorized indivi dual" as defined by 326 IAC 2

- 1. 1

- 1(1)

.
Request for renewal shall be submitted to:

Indiana Department of Environmental Management Permit Administration and Support Section, Office of Air Quality 100 North Senate Avenue MC 6 1

- 53 IGCN 1003 Indianapolis, In diana 4620 4

- 2251

(b) A timely renewal application is one that is:

(1) Submitted at least one hundred twenty (120) days prior to the date of the expiration of this permit; andKYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Second Notice Only Change No : 081

- 30224

- 00015 Page 11 of 27 Franklin , Indiana Change by: Janet Mobley M081

- 23686

- 00015 Permit Reviewer: ERG/SE

( 2) If the date postmarked on the envelope or certified mail receipt, or aff ixed by the shipper on the private shipping receipt, is on or before the date it is due. If the document is submitted by any other means, it shall be considered timely if received by IDEM, OAQ on or before the date it is due.

(c) If the Permittee submits a timely and complete application for renewal of this permit, the source’s failure to have a permit is not a violation of 326 IAC 2

- 6.1 until IDEM, OAQ takes final action on the renewal application, except that this protection shall cease to apply if, sub sequent to the completeness determination, the Permittee fail s to submit by the deadline specified, pursuant to 326 IAC 2

- 6. 1

- 4(b)

, in writing by IDEM, OAQ any additional information identified as being needed to process the application.

B.13 Permit Amend ment or Revision [ 326 IAC 2

- 5. 1

- 3(e)(3)][ 326 IAC 2

- 6. 1

- 6] (a) Permit amendments and revisions are governed by the requirements of 326 IAC 2

- 6. 1

- 6 whenever t he Permittee seeks to amend or modify this permit.

(b) Any application requesting an amendment or modification of this permit shall be submitted to:

Indiana Department of Environmental Management Permit Administration and Support Section, Office of Air Q uality 100 North Senate Avenue MC 6 1

- 53 IGCN 1003 Indianapolis, Indiana 4620 4

- 2251

(c) The Permittee shall notify the OAQ no later than thirty (30) calendar days of implementing a notice

- only change. [ 326 IAC 2

- 6. 1

- 6(d)]

B.14 Source Modification Requir ement A modification, construction, or reconstruction is governed by the requirements of 326 IAC 2.

B.15 Inspection and Entry [ 326 IAC 2

- 5. 1

- 3(e)(4)(B)][ 326 IAC 2

- 6. 1

- 5(a)(4)][ IC 13

- 1 4

- 2

- 2][ IC 13

- 1 7

- 3

- 2][ IC 13

- 3 0

- 3

- 1] Upon presentation of proper identification cards, credentials, and other documents as m ay be required by law, and subject to the Permittee’s right under all applicable laws and regulations to assert that the information collected by the agency is confidential and entitled to be treated as such, the Permittee shall allow IDEM, OAQ, U.S. EPA

, or an authorized representative to perform the following:

(a) Enter upon the Permittee's premises where a permitted source is located, or emissions related activity is conducted, or where records must be kept under the conditions of this permit;

(b) As a uthorized by the Clean Air Act, IC 13

- 1 4

- 2

- 2, IC 13

- 1 7

- 3

- 2, and IC 13

- 3 0

- 3

- 1, have access to and copy , at reasonable times, any records that must be kept under the conditions of this permit;

(c) As authorized by the Clean Air Act, IC 13

- 1 4

- 2

- 2, IC 13

- 1 7

- 3

- 2, and IC 13

- 3 0

- 3

- 1, inspect , at reasonable times, any facilities , equipment (including monitoring and air pollution control equipment), practices, or operations regulated or required under this permit;KYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Second Notice Only Change No : 081

- 30224

- 00015 Page 12 of 27 Franklin , Indiana Change by: Janet Mobley M081

- 23686

- 00015 Permit Reviewer: ERG/SE

(d) As authorized by the Clean Air Act, IC 13

- 1 4

- 2

- 2, IC 13

- 1 7

- 3

- 2, and IC 13

- 3 0

- 3

- 1, sample or monitor , at reasonable times, substances or parameters for the purpose of assuring compliance with this permit or applicable requirements; and

(e) As authorized by the Clean Air Act, IC 13

- 1 4

- 2

- 2, IC 13

- 1 7

- 3

- 2 , and IC 13

- 3 0

- 3

- 1, utilize any photographic, recording, testing, monitoring, or other equipment for the purpose of assuring compliance with this permit or applicable requirements.

B.16 Transfer of Ownership or Operational Control [ 326 IAC 2

- 6. 1

- 6] (a) The Permittee must comply with the requirements of 326 IAC 2

- 6. 1

- 6 whenever the Permittee seeks to change the ownership or operational control of the source and no
ot her change in the permit is necessary.

(b) Any application requesting a change in the ownership or operational control of the source shall contain a written agreement containing a specific date for transfer of permit responsibility, coverage and liability between the current and new Permittee. The application shall be submitted to:

Indiana Department of Environmental Management Permit Administration and Support Section, Office of Air Quality 100 North Senate Avenue MC 6 1

- 53 IGCN 1003 Indianapolis, Indian a 4620 4

- 2251

The application which shall be submitted by the Permittee does require an affirmation that the statements in the application are true and complete by an "authorized individual" as defined by 326 IAC 2

- 1. 1

- 1(1)

.
(c) The Permittee may implemen t notice

- only changes addressed in the request for a notice

only change immediately upon submittal of the request. [ 326 IAC 2

- 6. 1

- 6(d)(3)]

B.17 Annual Fee Payment [ 326 IAC 2

- 1. 1

- 7] (a) The Permittee shall pay annual fees due no later than thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of a bill from IDEM, OAQ,

.
(b) The Permittee may call the following telephone numbers: 1

- 80 0

- 45 1

- 6027 or
31 7

- 23 3

- 4230 (ask for OAQ, Billing, Licensing, and Training Sec tion)

, to determine the appropriate permit fee.

B.18 Credible Evidence [ 326 IAC 1

- 1

- 6] For the purpose of submitting compliance certifications or establishing whether or not the Permittee has violated or is in violation of any condition of this permit, nothing in this permit shall preclude the use, including the exclusive use, of any credible evidence or information relevant to whether the Permittee would have been in compliance with the condi tion of this permit if the appropriate performance or compliance test or procedure had been performed.KYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Second Notice Only Change No : 081

- 30224

- 00015 Page 13 of 27 Franklin , Indiana Change by: Janet Mobley M081

- 23686

- 00015 Permit Reviewer: ERG/SE

SECTION C SOURCE OPERATION CONDITIONS

Entire Source

Emission Limitations and Standards [ 326 IAC 2

- 6. 1

- 5(a)(1)]

C.1 Particulate Emission Limitations For Processes with Process Weight Rates Less Than One Hundred (100) Pounds per Hour [ 326 IAC 6

- 3

- 2]
Pursuant to 326 IAC 6

- 3

- 2(e)(2), particulate emissions from any process not exempt under
326 IAC 6

- 3

- 1(b) or (c) which has a maximum process weight rate less than 100 pounds per hour and the methods in 326 IAC 6

- 3

- 2(b) through (d) do not apply shall not exceed 0.551 pounds per
hour.

C.2 Permit Revocation [ 326 IAC 2

- 1. 1

- 9]
Pursuant to 326 IAC 2

- 1. 1

- 9 (Revocation of Permits), this permit to operate may be revoked for any of the following causes:

(a) Violation of any conditions of this permit.

(b) Failure to disclose all the relevant facts, or misrepres entation in obtaining this permit.

(c) Changes in regulatory requirements that mandate either a temporary or permanent reduction of discharge of contaminants. However, the amendment of appropriate sections of this permit shall not require revocation of t his permit.

(d) Noncompliance with orders issued pursuant to 326 IAC 1

- 5 (Episode Alert Levels) to reduce emissions during an air pollution episode.

(e) For any cause which establishes in the judgment of IDEM

, the fact that continuance of this permit is not consistent with purposes of this article

.

C.3 Opacity [ 326 IAC 5

- 1]
Pursuant to 326 IAC 5

- 1

- 2 (Opacity Limitations), except as provided in 326 IAC 5

- 1

- 1 (Applicability) and 326 IAC 5

- 1

- 3 (Temporary Alternative Opacity Limitations), opacity shall meet the following, unless otherwise stated in this permit:

(a) Opacity shall not exceed an average of forty percent (40%) in any one (1) six (6) minute averaging period as determined in 326 IAC 5

- 1

- 4.

(b ) Opacity shall not exceed sixty percent (60%) for more than a cumulative total of fifteen (15) minutes (sixty (60) readings as measured according to 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 9 or fifteen (15) one (1) minute nonoverlapping integrated averages for a

co ntinuous opacity monitor) in a six (6) hour period.

C.4 Open Burning [ 326 IAC 4

- 1] [ IC 13

- 1 7

- 9] The Permittee shall not open burn any material except as provided in 326 IAC 4

- 1

- 3,
326 IAC 4

- 1

- 4 or 326 IAC 4

- 1

- 6. The previous sentence notwithstanding, the Permittee may open burn in accordance with an open burning approval issued by the Commissioner under
326 IAC 4

- 1

- 4.1.

C.5 Incineration [ 326 IAC 4

- 2] [ 326 IAC 9

- 1

- 2] The Permittee shall not operate an incinerator except as provided in 326 IAC 4

- 2 or in this permit. The Permittee shall not operate a refuse incinerator or refuse burning equipment except as provid ed in 326 IAC 9

- 1

- 2 or in this permit.KYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Second Notice Only Change No : 081

- 30224

- 00015 Page 14 of 27 Franklin , Indiana Change by: Janet Mobley M081

- 23686

- 00015 Permit Reviewer: ERG/SE

C.6 Fugitive Dust Emissions [ 326 IAC 6

- 4] The Permittee shall not allow fugitive dust to escape beyond the property line or boundaries of the proper ty, right

- of

- way, or easement on which the source is located, in a manner that would violate 326 IAC 6

- 4 (Fugitive Dust Emissions).

C.7 Asbestos Abatement Projects [ 326 IAC 1 4

- 10] [ 326 IAC 18] [40 CFR 61, Subpart M] (a) Notification requirements apply to each owner or operator. If the combined amount of regulated asbestos containing material (RACM) to be stripped, removed or disturbed is at
lea st 260 linear feet on pipes or 160 square feet on other facility components, or at least thirty

- five (35) cubic feet on all facility components, then the notification requirements of
326 IAC 1 4

- 1 0

- 3 are mandatory. All demolition projects require notificat ion whether or not asbestos is present.

(b) The Permittee shall ensure that a written notification is sent on a form provided by the Commissioner at least ten (10) working days before asbestos stripping or removal work or before demolition begins, per 326 IAC 1 4

- 1 0

- 3, and shall update such notice as necessary, including, but not limited to the following:

(1) When the amount of affected asbestos containing material increases or decreases by at least twenty percent (20%); or

(2) If there is a change in the following:

(A) Asbestos removal or demolition start date;

(B) Removal or demolition contractor; or

(C) Waste disposal site.

(c) The Permittee shall ensure that the notice is postmarked or delivered according to the guidelines set forth in 326 IAC 1 4

- 1 0

- 3(2).

(d) The notice to be submitted shall include the information enumerated in
326 IAC 1 4

- 1 0

- 3(3).

All required notifications shall be submitted to:

Indiana Department of Environmental Management Compliance and Enforcement Branch, Office of Air Qual ity 100 North Senate Avenue MC 6 1

- 53 IGCN 1003 Indianapolis, Indiana 4620 4

- 2251

The notice shall include a signed certification from the owner or operator that the information provided in this notification is correct and that only Indiana licensed workers and project supervisors will be used to implement the asbestos removal project.

(e) Procedures for Asbestos Emission Control The Permittee shall comply with the applicable emission control procedures in
326 IAC 1 4

- 1 0

- 4 and 40 CFR 61.145(c). Per 326 IAC 1 4

- 1 0

- 1, emission control requirements are applicable for any removal or disturbance of RACM greater than three (3) linear feet on pipes or three (3) square feet on any other facility components or a total of at least 0.75 cubic feet on all facility compon ents.KYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Second Notice Only Change No : 081

- 30224

- 00015 Page 15 of 27 Franklin , Indiana Change by: Janet Mobley M081

- 23686

- 00015 Permit Reviewer: ERG/SE

(f) Demolition and Renovation The Permittee shall thoroughly inspect the affected facility or part of the facility where the demolition or renovation will occur for the presence of asbestos pursuant to
40 CFR 61.145(a).

(g) Indiana Licensed Asbesto s Inspector The Permittee shall comply with 326 IAC 1 4

- 1 0

- 1(a) that requires the owner or operator, prior to a renovation/demolition, to use an Indiana Licensed Asbestos Inspector to thoroughly inspect the affected portion of the facility for the presence of asbestos. The requirement to use an Indiana Licensed Asbestos inspector is not federally enforceable.

Testing Requirements [ 326 IAC 2

- 6. 1

- 5(a)(2)]

C.8 Performance Testing [ 326 IAC 3

- 6] (a) For performance testing required by this permit, a test protocol, except as provided elsewhere in this permit, shall be submitted to:

Indiana Department of Environmental Management C ompliance and Enforcement Branch, Office of Air Quality 100 North Senate Avenue MC 6 1

- 53 IGCN 1003 Indianapolis, Indiana 4620 4

- 2251

no later than thirty

- five (35) days prior to the intended test date.

(b) The Permittee shall notify IDEM, OAQ of the actua l test date at least fourteen (14) days prior to the actual test date.

(c) Pursuant to 326 IAC 3

- 6

- 4(b), all test reports must be received by IDEM, OAQ not later than forty

- five (45) days after the completion of the testing. An extension may be granted
b y IDEM, OAQ if the Permittee submits to IDEM, OAQ a reasonable written explanation not later than five (5) days prior to the end of the initial forty

- five (45) day period.

Compliance Requirements [ 326 IAC 2

- 1. 1

- 11]

C.9 Compliance Requirements [ 326 IAC 2

- 1. 1

- 11] The commissioner may require stack testing, monitoring, or reporting at any time to assure compliance with all applicable requirements by issuing an order under 326 IAC 2

- 1. 1

- 11. Any monitoring or testing shall be performed in accordance with 326 IAC 3 or other methods approved by the commissioner or the U. S. EPA.KYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Second Notice Only Change No : 081

- 30224

- 00015 Page 16 of 27 Franklin , Indiana Change by: Janet Mobley M081

- 23686

- 00015 Permit Reviewer: ERG/SE

Compliance Monitoring Requirements [ 326 IAC 2

- 6

. 1

- 5(a)(2)]

C.10 Compliance Monitoring [ 326 IAC 2

- 1. 1

- 11] Compliance with applicable requirements sh all be documented as required by this permit. The Permittee shall be responsible for installing any necessary equipment and initiating any required monitoring related to that equipment. All monitoring and record keeping requirements not already legally re quired shall be implemented when operation begins.

C.11 Instrument Specifications [ 326 IAC 2

- 1. 1

- 11] (a) When required by any condition of this permit, an analog instrument used t o measure a parameter related to the operation of an air pollution control device shall have a scale such that the expected maximum reading for the normal range shall be no less than twenty percent (20%) of full scale

.
(b) The Permittee may request that the I DEM, OAQ approve the use of an instrument that does not meet the above specifications provided the Permittee can demonstrate that an alternative instrument specification will adequately ensure compliance with permit conditions requiring the measurement of the parameters.

Corrective Actions and Response Steps

C.12 Response to Excursions or Exceedances Upon detecting an excurs ion where a response step is required by the D Section or an exceedance of a limitation in this permit:

(a) T he Permittee shall take reasonable response steps to restore operation of the emissions unit (including any control device and associated capture system) to its normal or usual manner of operation as expeditiously as practicable in accordance with good air pollution control practices for minimizing excess emissions.

(b) The response shall include minimizing the period of any startup, shutdown or

m alfunction

. The response may include, but is not limited to, the following:

(1) initial inspection and evaluation;

(2) recording that operations returned or are returning to normal without operator action (such as through response by a computerized distr ibution control system);

or

(3) any necessary follow

- up actions to return operation to normal or usual manner of operation.

(c) A determination of whether the Permittee has used acceptable procedures in response to an excursion or exceedance will be bas ed on information available, which may include, but is not limited to, the following:

(1) monitoring results;

(2) review of operation and maintenance procedures and records; and/or

(3) inspection of the control device, associated capture system, and the process.

(d) Failure to take reasonable response steps shall be considered a deviation from the permit.KYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Second Notice Only Change No : 081

- 30224

- 00015 Page 17 of 27 Franklin , Indiana Change by: Janet Mobley M081

- 23686

- 00015 Permit Reviewer: ERG/SE

(e) The Permittee shall record the reasonable response steps taken.

C.13 Actions Related to Noncompliance Demonstrated by a Stack Test (a) When the results of a stack test performed in conformance with Section C

- Performance Testing, of this permit exceed the level specified in any condition of this permit, th e Permittee shall submit a description of its response actions to IDEM, OAQ, no later than seventy

- five (75) days after the date of the test.

(b) A retest to demonstrate compliance shall be performed no later than one hundred eighty (180) days after the d ate of the test. Should the Permittee demonstrate to IDEM, OAQ that retesting in one hundred eighty (180) days is not practicable, IDEM, OAQ may extend the retesting deadline

(c) IDEM, OAQ reserves the authority to take any actions allowed under law in r esponse to noncompliant stack tests.

Record Keeping and Reporting Requirements [ 326 IAC 2

- 6. 1

- 5(a)(2)]

C.14 Malfunctions Report [ 326 IAC 1

- 6

- 2]
Pursuant to 326 IAC 1

- 6

- 2 (Records; Notice of Malfunction):

(a) A record of all malfunctions, including startups or shutdowns of any facility or emission control equipment, which result in violations of appli cable air pollution control regulations or applicable emission limitations shall be kept and retained for a period of three (3) years and shall be made available to the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM), Office of Air Quality (OAQ) or a ppointed representative upon request.

(b) When a malfunction of any facility or emission control equipment occurs which lasts more than one (1) hour, said condition shall be reported to OAQ, using the Malfunction Report Forms (2 pages). Notification sha ll be made by telephone or facsimile, as soon as practicable, but in no event later than four (4) daytime business hours after the beginning of said occurrence.

(c) Failure to report a malfunction of any emission control equipment shall constitute a vio lation of 326 IAC 1

- 6, and any other applicable rules. Information of the scope and expected duration of the malfunction shall be provided, including the items specified in
326 IAC 1

- 6

- 2(a)(1) through (6).

(d) Malfunction is defined as any sudden, unavoi dable failure of any air pollution control equipment, process, or combustion or process equipment to operate in a normal and usual manner. [ 326 IAC 1

- 2

- 39]

C.15 General Record Keeping Requirements [ 326 IAC 2

- 6. 1

- 5] (a) Records of all required monitoring data, reports and support information required by this permit shall be retained for a period of at least five (5) years from the date of monitoring sample, measurement, repo rt, or application. These records shall be physically present or electronically accessible at the source location for a minimum of three (3) years. The records may be stored elsewhere for the remaining two (2) years as long as they are available upon req uest. If the Commissioner makes a request for records to the Permittee, the Permittee shall furnish the records to the Commissioner within a
reasonable time.

(b) Unless otherwise specified in this permit, for all record keeping requirements not already
l egally required, the Permittee shall be allowed up to ninety (90) days from the date ofKYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Second Notice Only Change No : 081

- 30224

- 00015 Page 18 of 27 Franklin , Indiana Change by: Janet Mobley M081

- 23686

- 00015 Permit Reviewer: ERG/SE

permit issuance or the date of initial start

- up, whichever is later, to begin such record keeping.

C.16 General Reporting Requirements [ 326 IAC 2

- 1. 1

- 11] [ 326 IAC 2

- 6. 1

- 2] [ IC 13

- 1 4

- 1

- 13] (a) Reports required by conditions in Section D of this permit shall be submitted to:

Indiana Department of Environmen tal Management Compliance and Enforcement Branch, Office of Air Quality 100 North Senate Avenue MC 6 1

- 53 IGCN 1003 Indianapolis, Indiana 4620 4

- 2251

(b) Unless otherwise specified in this permit, any notice, report, or other submission required by this pe rmit shall be considered timely if the date postmarked on the envelope or certified mail receipt, or affixed by the shipper on the private shipping receipt, is on or before the date it is due. If the document is submitted by any other means, it shall be

c onsidered timely if received by IDEM, OAQ on or before the date it is due.

(c) Reporting periods are based on calendar years, unless otherwise specified in this permit. For the purpose of this permit “calendar year” means the twelve (12) month period fro m January 1 to December 31 inclusive.KYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Second Notice Only Change No : 081

- 30224

- 00015 Page 19 of 27 Franklin , Indiana Change by: Janet Mobley M081

- 23686

- 00015 Permit Reviewer: ERG/SE

SECTION D.1 EMISSIONS UNIT OPERATION CONDITIONS

Emissions Unit Description:

(a) Four (4) chrome electroplating lines with open surface hard chrome el ectroplating tanks, using hexavalent chromium and with a cumulative rectifier capacity of 882 million amp

- hours per year (not including etch rectifiers) consisting of the following:

(1) One (1) hard chrome electroplating line (identified as P

- 1), constru cted in 1997, consisting of seven (7) rectifiers: six (6) rectifiers with a maximum capacity of 6,000 amperes and one (1) etch rectifier with a maximum capacity of 4,000 amperes controlled by a composite wet mesh pad followed by three stage wet scrubber. T his electroplating line has a maximum throughput capacity of 550 piston rods per hour. Emissions are exhausted through stack H300

- A.

This electroplating tank is considered an existing large hard chromium electroplating tank under 40 CFR 63, Subpart N. [40 CFR 63, Subpart N]

(2) One (1) hard chrome electroplating line (identified as P

- 2), constructed in 1997, consisting of seven (7) rectifiers: six (6) rectifiers with a maximum capacity of 6,000 amperes and one (1) etch rectifier with a max imum capacity of 4,000 amperes controlled by a four

- stage wet scrubber where the first two stages are a wet packed bed followed by one stage of composite mesh pads and a final packed bed stage. This electroplating line has a maximum throughput capacity of 550 piston rods per hour. Emissions are exhausted through stack H200

- A.

This electroplating tank is considered an existing large hard chromium electroplating tank under 40 CFR 63, Subpart N. [40 CFR 63, Subpart N]

(3) One (1) hard chrome e lectroplating line (identified as P

- 3), constructed in 2002, consisting of seven (7) rectifiers: six (6) rectifiers with a maximum capacity of 6,000 amperes and one (1) etch rectifier with a maximum capacity of 4,000 amperes controlled by a three stage wet scrubber where the first stage is a wet bed scrubber followed by two stages of composite mesh pads . This electroplating line has a maximum throughput capacity of 1000 piston rods per hour. Emissions are exhausted through stack H400

- A.

This electroplating tank is considered a new large hard chromium electroplating tank under 40 CFR 63, Subpart N. [40 CFR 63, Subpart N]

(4) One (1) hard chrome electroplating line (identified as P

- 4), constructed in 2005, consisting of eight (8) rectifiers: s even (7) rectifiers with a maximum capacity of 6,000 amperes and one (1) etch rectifier with a maximum capacity of 4,000 amperes controlled by a three stage wet scrubber where the first stage is a wet bed scrubber followed by two stages of composite mesh p ads . This electroplating line has a maximum throughput capacity of 1,350 piston rods per hour. Emissions are exhausted through stack H500

- A.

This electroplating tank is considered a new large hard chromium electroplating tank under 40 CFR 63 , Subpart N. [40 CFR 63, Subpart N]

(The information describing the process contained in this emissions unit description box is descriptive information and does not constitute enforceable conditions.)KYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Second Notice Only Change No : 081

- 30224

- 00015 Page 20 of 27 Franklin , Indiana Change by: Janet Mobley M081

- 23686

- 00015 Permit Reviewer: ERG/SE

Emission Limitations and Standards [ 326 IAC 2

- 6. 1

- 5(a)(1)]

D.1.1 Particulate Emissions [326 IAC 6

- 3]
Pursuant to 326 IAC 6

- 3

- 2(e), when ope rating at a process weight rate less than sixty thousand (60,000) pounds per hour, the allowable particulate emission rate for each hard chromium electroplating line shall be calculated by the following:

Interpolation of the data for process weight rates u p to sixty thousand (60,000) pounds per hour shall be accomplished by use of the equation:

E = 4.10 P 0.67

P = process weight rate in tons per hour. Where: E = rate of emission in pounds per hour; and

D.1.2 Preventive Maintenance Plan [326 IAC 1

- 6

- 3] A Preventive Maintenance Plan, in accordance with Section B

- Preventive Maintenance Plan, of this permit, is required for the electroplating lines and their control devi ces

.

Compliance Determination Requirements

D.1.3 Particulate Control (a) In order to comply with condition D.1.1 and 40 CFR 63, Subpart N, the wet bed scrubber/composite mesh pad systems for particulate control shall be in operation and
control emissions from the electroplating lines (P

- 1, P

- 2, P

- 3, and P

- 4) at all times that these electroplating lines are in operation.

(b) In the event that a failure is observed in a composite mesh pad system , if operations will continue for ten (10) days or more after t he failure is observed before the failed units will be repaired or replaced, the Permittee shall promptly notify the IDEM, OAQ of the expected date the failed units will be repaired or replaced. The notification shall also include the status of the applic able compliance monitoring parameters with respect to normal, and the results of any response actions taken up to the time of notification.KYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Second Notice Only Change No : 081

- 30224

- 00015 Page 21 of 27 Franklin , Indiana Change by: Janet Mobley M081

- 23686

- 00015 Permit Reviewer: ERG/SE

SECTION D. 2 EMISSIONS UNIT OPERATION CONDITIONS

Emissions Unit Description:

(e) Five (5) natural gas

- fired boilers:

(1) E

- Coat 1 Process Boiler No. 1 (identified as EC1

- J300

- 22A), constructed in July 2007 having a maximum heat input capacity of 2.00 MMBtu/hour, exhau sting through stack J300

- 22A; [326 IAC 6

- 2] Note: this unit replaced E

- Coat 1 Process Boiler No.1 constructed in June 1991 with a heat input capacity of 1.69 MMBtu/hour from the original MSOP 081

- 12622

- 0158.

(2) E

- Co at 1 Process Boiler No. 2 (identified as EC1

- J300

- 22B), constructed in July 2007 having a maximum heat input capacity of 2.00 MMBtu/hour, exhausting through stack J300

- 22B; [326 IAC 6

- 2] Note: this unit replaced E

- Coat 1 Process Boiler No.2 constructed in June 1991 with a heat input capacity of 1.69 MMBtu/hour from the original MSOP 081

- 12622

- 0158.

(3 ) E

- Coat 3 P roce ss Boiler (identified as EC3

- Q300

- 23E), constructed in 2005 having a maximum heat input capacity of 3.0 MMBtu/hr, exhausting through stack Q300

- 23E; [326 IAC 6

- 2]

(4) Space heating Boiler No. 1, constructed in June 1988, having a maximum heat input capacity of 10.461 MMBtu/hr, exhausting through stack L85090; [326 IAC 6

- 2] and

(5) Space heating Boiler No. 2, constructed in June 1988, having a maximum heat input capacity of 10.461 MMBtu/hr, exhausting through stack L85091. [326 IAC 6

- 2]

(The information describing the process contained in this emissions unit description box is descriptive information an d does not constitute enforceable conditions.)

Emission Limitations and Standards [ 326 IAC 2

- 6. 1

- 5(a)(1)]

D.2.1 Particulate Emissions [326 IAC 6

- 2] (a) Pursuant to 326 IAC 6

- 2

- 4(a), the particulate emissions from Space Heating Boiler No. 1 and Space Heating Boiler No. 2 shall not exceed 0.49 pounds per million Btu heat input.

(b) Pursuant to 326 IAC 6

- 2

- 4(a), the particulate emissions from E

- Coat 1 Process Boiler No. 1 and E

- Coat 1 Process Boiler No. 2 shall not exceed 0.4 6 pounds per million Btu heat input.

( c ) Pursuant to 326 IAC 6

- 2

- 4(a), the particulate emissions from E

- Coat 3 Process B oiler shall not exceed 0.45 pounds per million Btu heat input.

The limitations in (a) through (c) are calculated using the following equation:

P t = Q 1.09

0.26

Where:

P t = pounds of particulate matter emitted per million B tu heat input (lb/MMBtu).

Q = total sou rce operating capacity in MMBtu per hour heat inputKYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Second Notice Only Change No : 081

- 30224

- 00015 Page 22 of 27 Franklin , Indiana Change by: Janet Mobley M081

- 23686

- 00015 Permit Reviewer: ERG/SE

SECTION D.3 EMISSIONS UNIT OPERATION CONDITIONS

Emissions Unit Description:

(f) Fifty (50) roboti c MIG welding stations using baghouse fabric filters with a Torit Cartridge dust collector. The maximum throughput is 59.30 pounds of wire per hour. [326 IAC 6

- 3]

(The information describing the process contained in this emissions unit description box is descriptive information and does not constitute enforceable conditions.)

Emission Limitations and Standards [ 326 IAC 2

- 6. 1

- 5(a)(1)]

D.3.1 Particulate Emissions [326 I AC 6

- 3]
Pursuant to 326 IAC 6

- 3

- 2(e)(2), the allowable particulate emission rate for the welding operations is five hundred fifty

- one thous andths (0.551) pound per hour.KYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Second Notice Only Change No : 081

- 30224

- 00015 Page 23 of 27 Franklin , Indiana Change by: Janet Mobley M081

- 23686

- 00015 Permit Reviewer: ERG/SE

SECTI ON E.1 EMISSIONS UNIT OPERATION CONDITIONS

Emissions Unit Description:

(a) Four (4) chrome electroplating lines with open surface hard chrome electroplating tanks, using
hexavalent chromium and with a cumulative rectifier capacity of 882 million amp

- hours per year (not including etch rectifiers) consisting of the following:

(1) One (1) hard chrome electroplating line (identified as P

- 1), constructed in 1997, consisting of seven (7) rectifie rs: six (6) rectifiers with a maximum capacity of 6,000 amperes and one (1) etch rectifier with a maximum capacity of 4,000 amperes controlled by a composite wet mesh pad followed by three stage wet scrubber. This electroplating line has a maximum throughp ut capacity of 550 piston rods per hour. Emissions are exhausted through stack H300

- A.

This electroplating tank is considered an existing large hard chromium electroplating tank under 40 CFR 63, Subpart N. [40 CFR 63, Subpart N]

(2) One ( 1) hard chrome electroplating line (identified as P

- 2), constructed in 1997, consisting of seven (7) rectifiers: six (6) rectifiers with a maximum capacity of 6,000 amperes and one (1) etch rectifier with a maximum capacity of 4,000 amperes controlled by a four

- stage wet scrubber where the first two stages are a wet packed bed followed by one stage of composite mesh pads and a final packed bed stage. This electroplating line has a maximum throughput capacity of 550 piston rods per hour. Emissions are exhaus ted through stack H200

- A.

This electroplating tank is considered an existing large hard chromium electroplating tank under 40 CFR 63, Subpart N. [40 CFR 63, Subpart N]

(3) One (1) hard chrome electroplating line (identified as P

- 3), constr ucted in 2002, consisting of seven (7) rectifiers: six (6) rectifiers with a maximum capacity of 6,000 amperes and one (1) etch rectifier with a maximum capacity of 4,000 amperes controlled by a three stage wet scrubber where the first stage is a wet bed s crubber followed by two stages of composite mesh pads . This electroplating line has a maximum throughput capacity of 1000 piston rods per hour. Emissions are exhausted through stack H400

- A.

This electroplating tank is considered a new large hard chromium electroplating tank under 40 CFR 63, Subpart N. [40 CFR 63, Subpart N]

(4) One (1) hard chrome electroplating line (identified as P

- 4), constructed in 2005, consisting of eight (8) rectifiers: seven (7) rectifiers with a maximum capacity of 6,000 amperes and one (1) etch rectifier with a maximum capacity of 4,000 amperes controlled by a three stage wet scrubber where the first stage is a wet bed scrubber followed by two stages of composite mesh pads . This electroplating line has a maximum th roughput capacity of 1,350 piston rods per hour. Emissions are exhausted through stack H500

- A.

This electroplating tank is considered a new large hard chromium electroplating tank under 40 CFR 63, Subpart N. [40 CFR 63, Subpart N]

(The inf ormation describing the process contained in this emissions unit description box is descriptive information and does not constitute enforceable conditions.)KYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Second Notice Only Change No : 081

- 30224

- 00015 Page 24 of 27 Franklin , Indiana Change by: Janet Mobley M081

- 23686

- 00015 Permit Reviewer: ERG/SE

National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) Requirements: Hard and Decora tive Chromium Electroplating and Chromium Anodizing Tanks [326 IAC 20

- 8 ]

E.1.1 General Provisions Relating to National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants under 40 CFR Part 63 [326 IAC 20

- 1] [40 CFR Part 63, Subpart A] (a) Pursuant to 40 CFR 63. 340(b) , the Permittee shall comply with the provisions of 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart A

– General Provisions, which are incorporated by reference as 326 IAC
20

- 1

- 1, for the hard chromium electroplating operations P

- 1 through P

- 4 as specified in Table 1 of 4 0 CFR Part 63, Subpart N in accordance with schedule in 40 CFR 63

, Subpart N

.
(b) Pursuant to 40 CFR 63.10, the Permittee shall submit all required notifications and reports to:

Indiana Department of Environmental Management Compliance and Enforcement B ranch, Office of Air Quality 100 North Senate Avenue MC 61

- 53 IGCN 1003 Indianapolis, Indiana 46204

- 2251

E.1.2 National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Hard and Decorative Chromium Electroplating and Chromium Anodizing Tanks : Requir ements [40 CFR Part 63, Subpart N ]
T he Permittee shall comp ly with the following provisions of 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart N (included as Attachment A) which are incorporated by reference as 326 IAC 20

- 8 for the hard chromium electroplating operations P

- 1 thr ough P

- 4

.
(1) 40 CFR 63.340 (a), (b), (c), and (e) (2) 40 CFR 6 3.341 (3) 40 CFR 6 3

. 342 (a), (b)(1) through (b)(2)(ii), (c)(1)(i), (c)(3), (f)(1) through (f)(3)(B), (f)(3)(D) through (f)(3)(E), and Table 1 (4) 40 CFR 63.343 (a)(1)(ii), (a)(2), (a)(4), (a)(6), (b)(1), (c)( 1), and (c)(3) (5) 40 CFR 6 3

. 344 (6) 40 CFR 6 3

. 345 (7) 40 CFR 63.346 (a), (b)(1) through (b)(11), and (c) (8) 40 CFR 63.347 (9) 40 CFR 63.348 (10) Table 1KYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Second Notice Only Change No : 081

- 30224

- 00015 Page 25 of 27 Franklin , Indiana Change by: Janet Mobley M081

- 23686

- 00015 Permit Reviewer: ERG/SE

INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT OFFICE OF AIR QUALITY COMPLIANCE A ND ENFORCEMENT BRANCH

MINOR SOURCE OPERATING PERMIT ANNUAL NOTIFICATION

This form should be used to comply with the notification requirements under 326 IAC 2

- 6. 1

- 5(a)(5).

Company Name: KYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc.

Address: 2625 North Morto n

City: Franklin , Indiana 46131

Phone #: 31 7

- 73 6

- 7774

MSOP #: M08 1

- 2368 6

- 00015

I hereby certify that KYB Manufacturing

- North America,
I n c. is :  still in operation.

 no longer in operation.

I hereby certify that KYB Manufacturing

- Nor th America, Inc. is :  in compliance with the requirements of MSOP M08 1

- 2368 6

- 00015

.  not in compliance with the requirements of MSOP M08 1

- 2368 6

- 00015

.

Authorized Individual (typed):

Title:

Signature:

Date:

If there a re any conditions or requirements for which the source is not in compliance, provide a narrative description of how the source did or will achieve compliance and the date compliance was, or will be achieved.

Noncompliance:KYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Second Notice Only Change No : 081

- 30224

- 00015 Page 26 of 27 Franklin , Indiana Change by: Janet Mobley M081

- 23686

- 00015 Permit Reviewer: ERG/SE

MALFUNCTION REPORT

INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT OFFICE OF AIR QUALITY COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT BRANCH
FAX NUMBER: ( 317 ) 23 3

- 6865

This form should only be used to report malfunctions applicable to Rule 326 IAC 1

- 6 and to qualify for the exemption under 326 IAC 1

- 6

- 4.

THIS FACILITY MEETS THE APPLICABILITY REQUIREMENTS BECAUSE IT HAS POTENTIAL TO EMIT 25 TONS/YEAR PARTICULATE MATTER ?_____, 25 TONS/YEAR SULFUR DIOXIDE ?_____

, 25 TONS/YEAR NITROGEN OXIDES?_____, 25 TON S/YEAR VOC ?_____, 25 TONS/YEAR HYDROGEN SULFIDE ?_____, 25 TONS/YEAR TOTAL REDUCED SULFUR ?_____, 25 TONS/YEAR REDUCED SULFUR COMPOUNDS ?_____, 25 TONS/YEAR FLUORIDES ?_____, 100 TONS/YEAR CARBON MONOXIDE ?_____, 10 TONS/YEAR ANY SINGLE HAZARDOUS AIR POL LUTANT ?_____, 25 TONS/YEAR ANY COMBINATION HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANT ?_____, 1 TON/YEAR LEAD OR LEAD COMPOUNDS MEASURED AS ELEMENTAL LEAD ?_____, OR IS A SOURCE LISTED UNDER 326 IAC 2

- 5. 1

- 3(2) ?_____. EMISSIONS FROM MALFUNCTIONING CONTROL EQUIPMENT OR PROC ESS EQUIPMENT CAUSED EMISSIONS IN EXCESS OF APPLICABLE LIMITATION ________.

THIS MALFUNCTION RESULTED IN A VIOLATION OF: 326 IAC _______ OR, PERMIT CONDITION # _______ AND/OR PERMIT LIMIT OF _______________

THIS INCIDENT MEETS THE DEFINITION OF “MALFUNC TION” AS LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE ? Y N

THIS MALFUNCTION IS OR WILL BE LONGER THAN THE ONE (1) HOUR REPORTING REQUIREMENT ? Y N

COMPANY:__________________________________________ _______________PHONE NO. ( )

______________ _____ LOCATION: (CITY AND COUNTY)______________________________________________

___________________________ PERMIT NO. ________________ AFS PLANT ID: _______ _________ AFS POINT ID : ________________ INSP:__________ CONTROL/PROCESS DEVICE WHICH MALFUNCTIONED AND REASON:______________________

__________________

__________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________
DATE/TIME MALFUNCTION STARTED: _____/_____/ 20____ ________________

_________________________ AM / PM

ESTIMATED HOURS OF OPERATION WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION: ____________

___________________________

DATE/TIME CONTROL EQUIPMENT BACK

- IN SERVICE______/______/ 20____ _______________ AM/PM

TYPE OF POLLUTANTS EMITTED: TSP

, PM

- 10

, SO2

, VOC

, OTHE R:___________

_____________________________
ESTIMATED AMOUNT OF POLLUTANT EMITTED DURING MALFUNCTION: _________

______________________________

_________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________

MEASURES T AKEN TO MINIMIZE EMISSIONS:________

_____________________________ _________________________

_________________________________________________________________________ __________________________

REASONS WHY FACILITY CANNOT BE SHUTDOWN DURING REPAIRS:

CONTINUE D OPERATION REQUIRED TO PROVIDE ESSENTIAL CONTINUED OPERATION NECESSARY TO PREVENT INJURY TO PERSONS:_______

______________________________ * SERVICES:_______

______________________________

CONTINUED OPERATION NECESSARY TO PREVENT SEVERE DAMAGE TO EQUIPM ENT:_

_________________________ INTERIM CONTROL MEASURES: (IF APPLICABLE)__________________________________________________________

__

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________

MALFUNCTION R EPORTED BY:____________________

______ ________TITLE:________________

___________ (SIGNATURE IF FAXED)

MALFUNCTION RECORDED BY:_______________________DATE:________ __________TIME:__________________ *SEE PAGE 2 PAGE 1 OF 2KYB Manufacturing

- North America, Inc. Second Notice Only Change No : 081

- 30224

- 00015 Page 27 of 27 Franklin , Indiana Change by: Janet Mobley M081

- 23686

- 00015 Permit Reviewer: ERG/SE



### Please note

- This form should only be used to report malfunctions applicable to Rule 326 IAC 1

- 6 and to qualify for the exemption under 326 IAC 1

- 6

- 4.

326 IAC 1

- 6

- 1 Applicability of rule

Sec . 1. This rule applies to the owner or operator of any facility required to obtain a permit under
326 IAC 2

- 5.1 or 326 IAC 2

- 6.1.

326 IAC 1

- 2

- 39 “Malfunction” definition

Sec. 39. Any sudden, unavoidable failure of any air pollution control equipment, p rocess, or combustion or process equipment to operate in a normal and usual manner.

* Essential services are interpreted to mean those operations, such as, the providing of electricity by power plants. Continued operation solely for the economic benefit of the owner or operator shall not be sufficient reason why a facility cannot be shutdown during a control equipment shutdown.

If this item is checked on the front, please explain rationale:

______________________________________________________________ __________

________________________________________________________________________

PAGE 2 OF 2

## I NDIANA 

## D EPARTMENT OF 

## E NVIRONMENTAL 

## M ANAGEMENT

We Protect Hoosiers and Our Environment.

Mitchell E. Daniels Jr. 100 North Senate Avenue

Governor Indianapolis, Indiana 46204 (317) 232-8603 Thomas W. Easterly Toll Free (800) 451-6027

Commissioner www.idem.IN.gov

Recycled Paper An Equal Opportunity Employer Please Recycle SENT VIA U.S. MAIL: CONFIRMED DELIVERY AND SIGNATURE REQUESTED

TO: 

### Jerry Reamer KYB Manufacturing North America, Inc.
2625 N Morton Franklin, IN 46131-8820

DATE: March 10, 2011

FROM: Matt Stuckey, Branch Chief Permits Branch Office of Air Quality

SUBJECT: Final Decision MSOP
081-30224-00015

Enclosed is the final decision and supporting material s for the air permit application referenced above. Please note that this packet contains the original, signed, permit documents.

The final decision is being sent to you because our reco rds indicate that you are the contact person for this application. However, if you are no t the appropriate person within your company to receive this document, please forward it to the correct person.

A copy of the final decision and supporting mate rials has also been sent via standard mail to: OAQ Permits Branch Interested Parties List

If you have technical questions regarding the enclosed doc uments, please contact the Office of Air Quality, Permits Branch at (317) 233-0178, or toll-free at 1-800-451-6027 (ext. 3-0178), and ask to speak to the permit reviewer who prepared the permit. If you thin k you have received this do cument in error, please contact Joanne Smiddie-Brush of my staff at 1-800-451-6027 (ext 3-0185), or via e-mail at jbrush@idem.IN.gov

.

Final Applicant Cover letter.dot 11/30/07FACSIMILIE OF PS Form 3877Mail Code 61-53IDEM Staff CDENNY 3/10/2011KYB ManufacturingNorth America,Inc. 081-30224-00115(final)AFFIX STAMPHERE IFUSED ASCERTIFICATEOF MAILINGName andaddress ofSender►Indiana Department of EnvironmentalManagementOffice of Air Quality – Permits Branch100 N. SenateIndianapolis, IN 46204Type of Mail:CERTIFICATE OFMAILING ONLYLine ArticleNumberName, Address, Street and Post Office Address Postage HandingChargesAct. Value(If Registered)InsuredValueDue Send ifCODR.R.FeeS.D. Fee S.H.FeeRest.Del. FeeRemarks1Jerry Reamer KYB Manufacturing North America, Inc. 2625 N Morton Franklin IN 46131-8820 (Source CAATS)2Johnson County Commissioners 5 East Jefferson Franklin IN 46131(Local Official)3Franklin City Council and Mayors Office 55 W. Madison Street Franklin IN 46131(Local Official)4Johnson County HealthDepartment 86 W. Court St, Courthouse Annex Franklin IN 46131-2345(Health Department)5Frederick & Iva Moore 6019 W 650 N Ligonier IN 46767(Affected Party)6Larry and Becky Bischoff 10979 North Smokey Row Road Mooresville IN 46158(Affected Party)789101112131415Total number of piecesListed by SenderTotal number of PiecesReceived at Post OfficePostmaster, Per (Name ofReceiving employee)The full declaration of value is required on all domestic and international registered mail. Themaximum indemnity payable for the reconstruction of nonnegotiable documents under ExpressMail document reconstructing insurance is $50,000 perpiece subject to a limit of $50, 000 peroccurrence. The maximum indemnity payable onExpress mil merchandise insurance is $500.The maximum indemnity payable is $25,000 for registered mail, sent with optional postalinsurance. SeeDomestic Mail ManualR900, S913, andS921for limitations of coverage oninured and COD mail. SeeInternational Mail Manualfor limitations o coverage on internationalmail. Special handling charges apply only to Standard Mail (A) and Standard Mail (B) parcels.