alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
March 31, 1999 Financial Statements
</LEGEND>

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           3,912
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,412
<PP&E>                                          11,440
<DEPRECIATION>                                (11,440)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,412
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          122,963
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        50,161
<OTHER-SE>                                   (214,712)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,412
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,603
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,603)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,603)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,603)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.  No. 00-4295

SCOTTIE JENKINS, a/k/a Boobie,

Defendant-Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg.

G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge.

(CR-99-769)

Submitted: January 25, 2002

Decided: February 7, 2002

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

COUNSEL

Frank L. Eppes, EPPES & PLUMBLEE, P.A., Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellant. J. Rene Josey, United States Attorney, E. Jean

Howard, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c). 
OPINION

PER CURIAM: 

Scottie Jenkins appeals his conviction and sentence, pursuant to a

guilty plea without a written plea agreement, for conspiracy to possess cocaine base with the intent to distribute in violation of 21

U.S.C.A. § 841, 846 (West 1999 & Supp. 2001). Finding no error, we

affirm Jenkins’ conviction and sentence. 

Jenkins claims the district court did not satisfy the minimum

requirements of Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 when it accepted his guilty plea

because the court failed to fully explain the elements of the offense

and because his testimony could not form the basis of a voluntary and

intelligent plea. We have reviewed the record, however, and find no

reversible error in Jenkins’ Rule 11 hearing. Both the Government in

its summary of facts, and the district court in its explanation of the

charge contained in the indictment, summarized the elements of the

drug conspiracy. See generally United States v. Rhynes, 206 F.3d 349,

361 (4th Cir. 1999); United States v. Carter, 662 F.2d 274, 276 (4th

Cir. 1981). Moreover, at the plea hearing, Jenkins stated he understood the elements of the offense to which he was pleading guilty and

indicated he had in fact distributed drugs. Accordingly, we affirm Jenkins’ conviction. 

Jenkins also claims his 262-month sentence is invalid under

Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). Because Jenkins’ sentence is not above the thirty year statutory maximum of

§ 841(b)(1)(C) for a defendant with a prior felony drug conviction, we

find Apprendi is not implicated and affirm his sentence.* See United

States v. Promise, 255 F.3d 150 (4th Cir. 2001) (en banc), petition for

cert. filed, (U.S. Sept. 20, 2001) (No. 01-6398); United States v. Dinnall, 269 F.3d 418 (4th Cir. 2001). 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-

*At the time of the present conviction, Jenkins had two prior convictions for a felony drug offense, thus triggering § 841(b)(1)(C)’s thirty

year maximum penalty. 

2 UNITED STATES v. JENKINS
tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

UNITED STATES v. JENKINS 3
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

February 21, 2020

No. 04

- 19

- 00799

- C V

IN THE INTEREST OF B.R.W., A CHILD

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2016

- CI

- 11037 Honorable Mary Lou Alvarez, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellant , representing himself, filed a brief on February 10, 2020

. Appellant ’s brief recites alleged facts pertaining to his complaints about his child support enforcement case

. Appellant’s brief does not comply with Ru le 38.1 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.1. Specifically, the brief does not include the following:

• Table of Contents (that complies with the Rules)

,

• Index of Authorities,

• Statemen t of Facts (that complies with the Rules)

,

• Summary of the Argument,

• Argument,

• an Appendix (that complies with the Rules), or

• Certificate of Compliance.

See id. R. 9.4, 9.5, 38.1. The brief has these additional defects.

• No part of the brief contains any citations to the record. Contra id. R. 3 8.1(g) (“The statement [of facts] must be supported by record references.”); id. R. 38.1(i) (“The brief must contain .

. . appropriate citations .

. . to the record.”).

• The portions of the brief that may be constr ued as a statement of facts recite allege d facts and complaints, but the brief does not state how the trial court erred or present any legal arguments, with appropriate citations to authorities and the record, to present any legal basis for this court to r everse the trial court’s judgment. Contr a T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.1(i).

• The brief does not recite the standard of review and it contains no citations to statutes, rules

, or case law. Contra id. (requiring “appropriate citations to authorities”). In its current form, Appellant’s brief does not p resent anything for appellate review.This court may order a party to amend, supplement, or redraw a brief if it flagrantly violates Rule 38. See id. R. 38.9(a). We conclude that the defects described above constitute flagrant violations of Rule 38.

T herefore, we STRIKE Appellant’s brief an d ORDER Appellant to file an amended brief within TEN DAYS of the date of this order. The amended brief must correct all the violations listed above and fully comply with the applicable rules. See, e.g.
, id. R. 9.4 , 9.5, 38.1. If the amended brief does not comply with this order, we “may strike the brief, prohibit [Appellant] from filing another, and proceed as if [Appellant] had failed to file a brief.” See id.
R. 38.9(a); see also id. R. 38.8(a) (authorizing thi s court to dismiss an appeal if an appel lant fails to timely file a brief).
If Appellant timely files a brief that complies with this order, Appellees’ brief will be due thirty days after Appellant’s brief is filed. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(b).

_

________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 21st day of February, 2020

.

___________________________________ Michael A . Cruz
, Clerk of Court
|
|

|Energy Market and Economic Impacts of H.R. 2454, the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009                                                                             
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Figure 31.  Change in Real GDP in ACESA Main Cases, 2012-2030 (percent change from reference case).  Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800).
|Figure 31.  Change in Real GDP in ACESA Main Cases, 2012-2030 (percent change from reference case).  Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800).
|Figure 31.  Change in Real GDP in ACESA Main Cases, 2012-2030 (percent change from reference case).  Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800).
##### 



Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section
1350), each of the undersigned officers of CAM Commerce Solutions, Inc. (the
Company), does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the
Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the 10-Q Report) that to their knowledge:  (1)
    
    the 10-Q Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the 10-Q Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/ Geoffrey D. Knapp  
 /s/ Paul Caceres, Jr.  
 This certification accompanies this 10-Q Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for the
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
ORIUr
nINAL IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA OP 22-0457 JARED DeCACCIA, Petitioner, v. CAPTAIN BRADLEY BRAGG, LEWIS & CLARK COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, Respondent.

SEP
0 6 2022 BowenGreenwood C.;lerk. ofSupreme court State ofMontana ORDER Self-represented Petitioner Jared DeCaccia seeks

a writ of rnandarnus from this Court. DeCaccia claims that he developed multiple infections while being held in the Lewis and Clark County Detention Center (LCCDC). He states that "[t]his facility ignored my pleas to have rnedical treatment for 2 weeks." He further states that his initial infection led to asecond infection, and that his foot was oozing

fl uid, rnaking

it difficult
to walk. He further contends that the LCCDC withheld his antibiotic medication, after he received treatment, and that he had to payfor the medication. DeCaccia alleges that his constitutional rights have been violated. A writ of mandate

is specific and statutorily driven. Sections 27-26-101 through 27-26-403, MCA. To state

aclaim for mandate,

a party must show entitlement

to the perforrnance

of aclear legal duty by the party against whom the writ is directed and the absence of a plain, speedy, and adequate remedy
at law. Section 27-26-102, MCA; Smith v.Missoula Co., 1999 MT 330, ¶ 28, 297 Mont. 368, 992 P.2d 834. Upon review, DeCaccia has not demonstrated
the requirements

for
a writ of mandate. To the extent the petition alleges inadequate medical care,

awrit of mandate

is not the appropriate civil remedy. See Gates
v.Missoula Cty. Comm'rs, 235 Mont. 261,09/06/2022Case Number: OP 22-0457262, 766P.2d 884, 885 (1988) (holding that habeas corpus
is notthe correct remedy for constitutional claims, including lack of "adequate food, shelter, clothing, medical care, exercise, individual security, and
alaw library" and that "disputed factual issues should be directed
toan appropriate district court,since
itis notthe role of this Court tofunction
as primary fact-finder."). DeCaccia's clairns require factual development and determination, notsuitable
in an original writ proceeding before this Court. Because conditions
of confinement maybe challenged

inan ordinary civil rights action, DeCaccia hasaplain and adequate remedy of filing

a complaint

inastateorfederal district court. ITIS THEREFORE ORDERED that DeCaccia's Petition for Writ of Mandate

is DENIED and DISMISSED. The Clerk of the Supreme Courtis directed
to provide

acopytocounsel of record; to Captain Bradley Bragg, LCCDC; and toJared DeCaccia personally. DATED this .1;) day of September, 2022.
hief Justice 2
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 48 (Wednesday, March 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 11461]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6140]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[ID-957-1430-00]


Idaho: Filing of Plats of Survey; Idaho

    The plat of the following described land was officially filed in 
the Idaho State Office, Bureau of Land Management, Boise, Idaho, 
effective 9:00 a.m. March 3, 1997.
    The plat representing the dependent resurvey of portions of the 
subdivisional lines and the survey of lots 1 and 2 in section 8, T. 2 
N., R. 38 E., Boise Meridian, Idaho, Group No. 973, was accepted March 
3, 1997.
    This plat was prepared to meet certain administrative needs of the 
Bureau of Land Management. All inquiries concerning the survey of the 
above described land must be sent to the Chief, Cadastral Survey, Idaho 
State Office, Bureau of Land Management, 1387 S. Vinnell Way, Boise, 
Idaho, 83709-1657.

    Dated: March 3, 1997.
Duane E. Olsen,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor for Idaho.
[FR Doc. 97-6140 Filed 3-11-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GG-M
EXHIBIT 32(a)


                                Exhibit 32(a)
                               CERTIFICATION OF
                           CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                         PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. S 1350

  I, Mark E. Schwarz, Chief Executive Officer of Hallmark Financial Services,
 Inc. (the  "Company"),  hereby  certify  that  the  accompanying  report  on
 Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2003, and filed  with
 the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the  date hereof (the  "Report"),
 fully complies  with the  requirements of  Section 13(a) of  the  Securities
 Exchange Act of  1934, as amended.  I further certify  that the  information
 contained in  the Report  fairly presents,  in  all material  respects,  the
 financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



 Dated:  November 14, 2003      /s/ Mark E. Schwarz
                                -------------------
                                Mark E. Schwarz, Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 58 (Wednesday, March 26, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14480-14481]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-7756]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIMES AND DATES: 10:30 a.m., Monday, April 7, 1997; 8:30 a.m., Tuesday, 
April 8, 1997.

PLACE: New Orleans, Louisiana, at the Bourbon Orleans Hotel, 717 
Orleans Street, in the Ballroom.

STATUS: April 7 (Closed); April 8 (Open).

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Monday, April 7--10:30 a.m. (Closed)
    1. Funding Approval for Dinero Seguro.
    2. Rate Case Planning Process (Part 1 of 3).
    3. Priority Mail Network.
Tuesday, April 8--8:30 a.m. (Open)
    1. Minutes of the Previous Meeting, March 3-5, 1997.
    2. Remarks of the Postmaster General/Chief Executive Officer.
    3. Office of the Inspector General FY 1997 Budget.
    4. Report on the New Orleans Performance Cluster.

[[Page 14481]]

    5. Tentative Agenda for the May 5-6, 1997, meeting in Washington, 
DC.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Thomas J. Koerber, Secretary of 
the Board, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC 
20260-1000. Telephone (202) 268-4800.
Thomas J. Koerber,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-7756 Filed 3-21-97; 4:33 pm]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-M
**EXHIBIT99.1**

 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Bitstream Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities andExchange on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in thecapacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that to his or her knowledge:

 

1.               The Report complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

2.               The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operation of the Company.

 
| **SIGNATURE**                          |   | **TITLE**                                                                                             |   | **DATE**      |
|----------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------|
|                                   |   |                                                                                                  |   |          |
|    /s/  Charles Ying    |   | Chief  Executive Officer                                                                              |   | May  14, 2003 |
| Charles Ying                           |   |                                                                                                  |   |          |
|                                   |   |                                                                                                  |   |          |
|    /s/  Anna M. Chagnon |   | President,  Chief Operating Officer, and General Counsel                                              |   | May  14, 2003 |
| Anna M. Chagnon                        |   |                                                                                                  |   |          |
|                                   |   |                                                                                                  |   |          |
|    /s/  James P. Dore   |   | Vice  President, Chief Financial Officer and Controller (Principal Financial and  Accounting Officer) |   | May  14, 2003 |
| James P. Dore                          |   |                                                                                                  |   |          |

 

----
No. 12-5625.

#### Cunningham *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                               5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THIS FORM
10-KSB FOR THE YEAR ENDING  DECEMBER 31, 1998,  AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                DEC-31-1998

<CASH>                                          339,015
<SECURITIES>                                  4,989,540
<RECEIVABLES>                                   152,460
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              5,494,142
<PP&E>                                        5,182,223
<DEPRECIATION>                                3,930,305
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                7,635,628
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           151,397
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                         92,368
<OTHER-SE>                                    7,266,653
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  7,635,628
<SALES>                                       2,679,431
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              2,714,094
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   410,341
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                903,711
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               1,178,360
<INCOME-TAX>                                    320,937
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             857,423
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                    857,423
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     5.110
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     5.110
        


</TABLE>
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A20A1311. COREECE LENARD BRIDGES v. FREDERICK HEAD et al.

Appellant has failed to file a brief and enumeration of errors within 20 days

after the appeal was docketed as required by Court of Appeals Rule 23 (a) and as

notified in the Notice of Docketing. As Appellant has abandoned the appeal, the

appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

March 03, 2020

03/03/2020
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 60 (Friday, March 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 14909]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-7924]



[[Page 14909]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY
[FEMA-1167-DR]


Tennessee; Amendment to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of Tennessee, (FEMA-1167-DR), dated March 7, 1997, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 19, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3260.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster for the State 
of Tennessee, is hereby amended to include the following areas among 
those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the 
catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of March 7, 1997:

    The counties of Lake and Tipton for Individual Assistance, 
Hazard Mitigation, and Categories A and B under the Public 
Assistance program.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 83.516, Disaster 
Assistance.)
Dennis H. Kwiatkowski,
Deputy Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 97-7924 Filed 3-27-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P