13706 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 55 / Friday, March 21, 1997 / Notices

For a period of two years from the

date of publication in the Federal

Register, this land will be segregated

from the mining laws as specified above

unless the application is denied or

cancelled or the withdrawal is approved

prior to that date. During this period the

Forest Service will continue to manage

this land.

Jenny L. Saunders,

Realty Officer.

[FR Doc. 97–7152 Filed 3–20–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–JB–P

INTERNATIONAL TRADE

COMMISSION

Certain EPROM, EEPROM, Flash

Memory, and Flash Microcontroller

Semiconductor Devices and Products

Containing Same; Notice of

Investigation

[Investigation No. 337–TA–395]

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade

Commission.

ACTION: Institution of investigation

pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1337.

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a

complaint was filed with the U.S.

International Trade Commission on

February 18, 1997, under section 337 of

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19

U.S.C. § 1337, on behalf of Atmel

Corporation, 2325 Orchard Parkway,

San Jose, CA 95131. A supplemental

complaint was filed on March 10, 1997,

accompanied by a letter dated March 7,

1997. A second supplemental complaint

was filed on March 13, 1997,

accompanied by a letter dated March 12,

1997. The complaint, as supplemented,

alleges violations of section 337 in the

importation into the United States, the

sale for importation, and the sale within

the United States after importation of

certain EPROM, EEPROM, flash

memory, and flash microcontroller

semiconductor devices and products

containing same by reason of

infringement of claim 1 of U.S. Letters

Patent 4,511,811, claim 1 of U.S. Letters

Patent 4,673,829, claim 1 of U.S. Letters

Patent 4,794,565, and claims 1–9 of U.S.

Letters Patent 4,451,903. The complaint

further alleges that there exists an

industry in the United States as required

by subsection (a)(2) of section 337.

The complainant requests that the

Commission institute an investigation

and, after a hearing, issue a permanent

exclusion order and permanent cease

and desist orders.

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for

any confidential information contained

therein, is available for inspection

during official business hours (8:45 a.m.

to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the

Secretary, U.S. International Trade

Commission, 500 E Street, S.W., Room

112, Washington, D.C. 20436, telephone

202–205–2000. Hearing-impaired

individuals are advised that information

on this matter can be obtained by

contacting the Commission’s TDD

terminal on 202–205–1810.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Christine E. Lehman, Esq., Office of

Unfair Import Investigations, U.S.

International Trade Commission,

telephone 202–205–2582.

Authority: The authority for institution of

this investigation is contained in section 337

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and

in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules

of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10

(1996).

Scope of Investigation

Having considered the complaint, the

U.S. International Trade Commission,

on March 17, 1997, Ordered that—

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as

amended, an investigation be instituted

to determine whether there is a

violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of

section 337 in the importation into the

United States, the sale for importation,

or the sale within the United States after

importation of certain EPROM,

EEPROM, flash memory, or flash

microcontroller semiconductor devices

or products containing same by reason

of infringement of claim 1 of U.S.

Letters Patent 4,511,811, claim 1 of U.S.

Letters Patent 4,673,829, claim 1 of U.S.

Letters Patent 4,794,565, or claims 1–9

of U.S. Letters Patent 4,451,903, and

whether there exists an industry in the

United States as required by subsection

(a)(2) of section 337.

(2) For the purpose of the

investigation so instituted, the following

are hereby named as parties upon which

this notice of investigation shall be

served:

(a) The complainant is—Atmel

Corporation, 2325 Orchard Parkway,

San Jose, California 95131.

(b) The respondents are the following

companies alleged to be in violation of

section 337, and are the parties upon

which the complaint is to be served:

Sanyo Electric Co., Ltd., 5–5 Keihanhondori 2-chome, Osaka, 570, Japan

Winbond Electronics Corporation,

Number 2, R&D Road VI, ScienceBased Industrial Park, Hsinchu,

Taiwan

Winbond Electronics North, America

Corporation, 2730 Orchard Parkway,

San Jose, California 95134

Macronix International Co., Ltd., 3F, 4

Creation Road IV, Science-Based

Industrial Park, Hsinchu, Taiwan

Macronix, Inc., (a.k.a. Macronix

America, Inc.), 1338 Ridder Park

Drive, San Jose, California 95131.

(c) Christine E. Lehman, Esq., Office

of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S.

International Trade Commission, 500 E

Street, SW., Room 401–I, Washington,

DC 20436, who shall be the Commission

investigative attorney, party to this

investigation; and

(3) For the investigation so instituted,

the Honorable Paul J. Luckern is

designated as the presiding

administrative law judge.

Responses to the complaint and the

notice of investigation must be

submitted by the named respondents in

accordance with section 210.13 of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to

19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a) of the

Commission’s Rules, such responses

will be considered by the Commission

if received not later than 20 days after

the date of service by the Commission

of the complaint and the notice of

investigation. Extensions of time for

submitting responses to the complaint

will not be granted unless good cause

therefor is shown.

Failure of a respondent to file a timely

response to each allegation in the

complaint and in this notice may be

deemed to constitute a waiver of the

right to appear and contest the

allegations of the complaint and this

notice, and to authorize the

administrative law judge and the

Commission, without further notice to

the respondent, to find the facts to be as

alleged in the complaint and this notice

and to enter both an initial

determination and a final determination

containing such findings, and may

result in the issuance of a limited

exclusion order or a cease and desist

order or both directed against such

respondent.

Issued: March 18, 1997.

By order of the Commission.

Donna R. Koehnke,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97–7235 Filed 3–20–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P