alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 29 (Thursday, February 12, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 7907]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02876]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Thirteenth Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 227, Standards of 
Navigation Performance

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Meeting Notice of RTCA Special Committee 227, Standards of 
Navigation Performance, Correction to FR Doc. 2015-01829.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the 
thirteenth meeting of the RTCA Special Committee 227, Standards of 
Navigation Performance

DATES: The meeting will be held March 16-20 from 9:00 a.m.-4:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: RTCA Headquarters, 1150 18th Street NW., Suite 910, 
Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street 
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at (202) 330-0662 
or (202) 833-9339, fax at (202) 833-9434, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org. In addition, Sophie Bousquet may be contacted directly at 
email: sbousquet@rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is 
hereby given for a meeting of Special Committee 227. The agenda will 
include the following:

March 16-20 2015

     Welcome/Introductions/Administrative Remarks.
     Agenda Overview.
     Overview of Planned Work Program for the Week.
    [cir] Working Group 2 MOPS Change Proposals.
    [cir] MOPS Draft Review.
    [cir] SC-186 proposed addition to MASPS Appendix.
     Plenary Review/Discussion.
    [cir] Planned Work Schedule (Note, schedule subject to change).
    [cir] New tasking: Update to DO-257A, Electronic Map MOPS.
    [cir] MOPS Change Proposals for Incorporation into draft MOPS.
    [cir] 9:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. each day.
     Technical Requirements Breakout Sessions (as needed).
     Other Business.
     Adjourn.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on February 5th, 2015.
Mohannad Dawoud,
Management Analyst, NextGen, Program Oversight and Administration, 
Federal Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. 2015-02876 Filed 2-11-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
No. 12-5662.

#### Sylvester *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 12-5726.

#### Ryan *v.*Scism, Warden.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certio-rari denied.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JA NUARY 16, 2020

NO. 03

- 19

- 00482

- CR

Yordanis Quintero

- Gomez, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 21ST DISTRICT COURT OF BASTROP COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOO DWIN , BAKER, AND KELLY

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the judgment adjudicating guilt r en d ered by the trial court. Having

reviewed t he re cord and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error

in the judgment

. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment adjudicating guilt

.

Because appell ant is indigent and u nable to pay costs, no adjudica t i on of costs is made.
# table14
No. 12-5173.

#### Hinton *v.*Bailey, Sheriff, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina, et al.

Sup. Ct. N. C. Certiorari denied.
No. 14174

#### In the Matter of Mark A. Sherman, *Respondent.*

(332 P.3d 172)

In a letter signed July 28, 2014, addressed to the Clerk of the Appellate Courts, respondent Mark A. Sherman, an attorney admitted to the practice of law in the state of Kansas, voluntarily surrendered his license to practice law in Kansas, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 217 (2013 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 396).

At the time the respondent surrendered his license, his license to practice law was administratively suspended for failure to comply with the annual continuing legal education and attorney registration requirements. In addition, at the time the respondent surrendered his license, there was a panel hearing pending on a complaint in accordance with Supreme Court Rule 211 (2013 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 356). The complaint alleged that respondent violated Kansas Rules of Professional Conduct 1.1 (2013 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 446) (competence); 1.3 (2013 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 464) (diligence); 1.4 (2013 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 484) (communication); 1.16(a)(1) (2013 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 569) (declining or terminating representation); 3.2 (2013 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 587) (expediting litigation); 8.1(b) (2013 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 646) (bar admission and disciplinary matters); 8.4(d) and (g) (2013 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 655) (misconduct); Supreme Court Rule 207(b) (2013 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 336) (duties of the bar and judiciary); Supreme Court Rule 208 (2013 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 349) (registration of attorneys); Supreme Court Rule 211(b) (2013 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 356) (file an answer to the formal complaint); and Supreme Court Rule 218 (2013 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 406) (notice to clients, opposing counsel, and courts following suspension).

This court, having examined the files of the office of the Disciplinary Administrator, finds the surrender of the respondent’s license should be accepted and that tire respondent should be disbarred.

*476Dated this 5th day of August, 2014.

It Is Therefore Ordered that Mark A. Sherman be and he is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in Kansas, and his license and privilege to practice law are hereby revoked.

It Is Further Ordered that the Clerk of the Appellate Courts strike the name of Mark A. Sherman from the roll of attorneys licensed to practice law in Kansas.

It Is Further Ordered that this order shall be published in the Kansas Reports, that the costs herein shall be assessed to the respondent, and that the respondent forthwith shall comply with Supreme Court Rule 218.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

ROGER A. HOUSE,

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v. 

UNITED STATES, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

____________________ 

2012-5016 

______________________

 

 Appeal from the United States Court of Federal 

Claims in No. 08-CV-758, Judge Francis M. Allegra. 

______________________ 

JUDGMENT 

______________________ 

JOHN B. WELLS, Law Office of John B. Wells, of 

Slidell, Louisiana, argued for the plaintiff-appellant. 

STACEY K. GRIGSBY, Trial Attorney, Commercial 

Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States 

Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for the 

defendant-appellee. With her on the brief were STUART F.

DELERY, Acting Assistant Attorney General, JEANNE E.

DAVIDSON, Director, and BRYANT G. SNEE, Deputy 

Director. Of counsel on the brief was MICHAEL J.

MARINELLO, Office of the Judge Advocate General, 

General Litigation Division, United States Navy, of 

Washington, DC. 

______________________ 
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (RADER, Chief Judge, LOURIE and REYNA, 

Circuit Judges). 

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 August 8, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly

 Date Jan Horbaly 

 Clerk
# monthprod1985
No. 12-5396.

#### Borecki *v.*Arizona Department of Economic Security et al.

Ct. App. Ariz. Certiorari denied.
----

----

The Reserve Petroleum Company 10-K/A

| 1.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Report fairly present, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2011. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                |   |   |
|-------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Date:  September 25, 2012 |   | By:    | /s/ Cameron R. McLain |
|                                |   | Name:  | Cameron R. McLain, President |
|                                |   | Title: | (Principal Executive Officer) |

|                                |   |   |
|-------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Date:  September 25, 2012 |   | By:    | /s/ James L. Tyler |
|                                |   | Name:  | James L. Tyler, 2nd Vice President |
|                                |   | Title: | (Principal Financial Officer) |

----
No. 12-5171.

#### Paige *v.*Unknown Parties et al.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### State v. Bradley

111,781

03/28/2016

Denied.

Unpublished
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 6 (Thursday, January 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 1333]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-679]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY: Federal Election Commission

DATE & TIME: Tuesday, January 14, 1997 at 10:00 a.m.

PLACE: 999 E Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.

STATUS: This meeting will be closed to the public.

ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:

    Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. Sec. 437g.
    Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. Sec. 437g, Sec. 438(b), and 
Title 26, U.S.C.
    Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or 
arbitration.
    Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a 
particular employee.

DATE & TIME: Thursday, January 16, 1997 at 10:00 a.m.

PLACE: 999 E Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. (Ninth floor).

STATUS: This meeting will be open to the public.

ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:

    Correction and Approval of Minutes.
    Advisory Opinion 1996-50: Farm Credit Council, a corporation, Jan 
Witold Baran.
    Advisory Opinion 1996-52: Robert E. Andrews for Congress, by Ronald 
S. Ladell, counsel
    1997 Legislative Recommendations.
    Administrative Matters.

PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: Mr. Ron Harris, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 219-4155.
Marjorie W. Emmons,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 97-679 Filed 1-7-97; 3:40 pm]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
**EXHIBIT32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONOF**

**PRESIDENT ANDCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Inconnection with the Annual Report of MagStar Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2006 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jon L.Reissner, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant § 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirementsof section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.
| /s/    Jon L. Reissner |   |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|
| Jon L. Reissner                            |
| President and Chief Executive  Officer     |
| March 27, 2007                             |

 

Thiscertification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed to befiled by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.

----
#### *In re W.H.*

112,909

01/25/2016

Denied.

Unpublished
<PAGE>   1
                                                                Exhibit (10)(mm)

                               FIFTH AMENDMENT TO
                        THE REYNOLDS AND REYNOLDS COMPANY
                               401(K) SAVINGS PLAN
                          (JANUARY 1, 1994 RESTATEMENT)


     The Reynolds and Reynolds Company hereby amends The Reynolds and Reynolds
Company 401(k) Savings Plan (January 1, 1994 Restatement) (the "Plan") as
follows:

     Effective for periods beginning on or after March 1, 1996, the first
sentence of Section 2.1 of the Plan is amended to provide as follows:

         Each Employee who is in an eligible employment classification as set
         forth in this Section 2.1 shall become an Eligible Employee on or as
         soon as administratively practicable after the first date he is in an
         eligible employment classification as set forth in this Section 2.1,
         but in no event later than the first day of the sixth calendar week
         beginning after the first date he is in an eligible employment
         classification as set forth in this Section 2.1.

                                      * * *

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The Reynolds and Reynolds Company has caused this
Amendment to be executed by its duly authorized officer on this ____ day of
____________, 1996.

ATTEST:                                     THE REYNOLDS AND REYNOLDS COMPANY


_______________________                     By: ______________________________
                                             Title:
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 4733** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. CHRISSY A. MAY , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dis trict of West Virginia , at Charleston
. Thomas E. Joh nston , District Judge. ( 2:10

- cr - 00161

- 1 )

Submitted : December 13, 2011 Decided: December 23, 2011

Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed in p art; dismissed in part by un published per curiam opinion

. Jacqueline A. Hallinan, HALLINAN LAW OFFICES, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant. Joshua Clarke Hanks, Assistant United States Attorney, Huntington, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Un published opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Chrissy A. May appeals from her eighty

- seven - month sentence entered pursuant to her guilty plea to one count of conspiracy to distri bute oxycodone, in viola tion of 21 U.S.C.
§ 84 6 (2006)
. Counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), concluding that there are no meritorious grounds for appeal , but questioning whether May should have received a lower sentence for assisting the Government. The Go vernment filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the basis of the appellate waiver contained in May’s plea agreement. Although informed of her right to file a pro se supplemental brief, May has not file d one. A defendant may waive the right to appeal if that waiver is knowing and intelligent. United States v. Poindexter , 492 F.3d 263, 270 (4th Cir. 2007). Our independent review of the record supports the conclusion that May knowingly and intelligently waived her right to appeal her sentence . Because

w e conclude that the waiver is valid and enforceable as to May’s challenge to her sentence, we grant the Government’s motion to dismiss in part. The language of May’s waiver does not encompass a challenge to the validity of her guilty plea. Therefore, we deny the motion to dismiss as to May’s conviction

. However, our review of the record convinces us that May’s plea3 was knowing and voluntary. Accordingly, we affirm May’s conviction

. In accordance with Anders , we have reviewed the record in this case an d have found no meritorious issues for appeal outside the scope of the waiver . This court requires that counsel inform her client, in writing, of her right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If the client requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on the client. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED IN PART; D ISMISSED IN PART
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1273 

Nullifying the impeachment of Donald John Trump. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 31, 2020 

Mr. KING of Iowa submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Nullifying the impeachment of Donald John Trump. 

Whereas the U.S. Constitution states that ‘‘The President, 

Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, 

shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and 

conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and 

Misdemeanors’’; and 

Whereas President Donald J. Trump committed no such impeachable offense and has been exonerated and acquitted 

after a baseless, unconstitutional sham impeachment: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the impeachment of Donald John 

2 Trump, President of the United States, is nullified, as if 

3 such impeachment had not occurred, due to a lack of a 

4 constitutional basis for such impeachment, the House of 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1273 IH 

1 Representatives having failed to substantiate its allega2 tions of Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Mis3 demeanors, which is required by the United States Con4 stitution. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
P. 1 

# OAR Box 1846 Prepped byOllie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 41 ) ll-E- 1 Docket Number: 

# A-90-0 7

Printed 11/18/20087:30:15AM Sheet 41 of 93J 1 . 4. P. 2 

### TI-£X0 | ATTENDANC E Environmenta l Protectio n Agnec y Fue l an d Fue l Additiv

e Registratio

n Publi c Hearin

g September 26 , 199 0 Nam e Company/Organizatio n 

## 2 

# .d^u ^ l^U PCf H^ ^

6 . 7 . 

## fc



# tf %

# V"

10. . 12. . 13. . 14. . 15 .P. 3 ATTENDANC E Environmenta l Protectio n Agnec y Fue l an d Fue l Additiv e Registratio n Publi c Hearing Septembe r 26 , 199 0 Name 

# i . MAR.K<G#&4

4 . )uS^U

rSndAGjLj



# «T74 - .0 . . 1 . L2 . L3 . Company/Organizatio n

Vito* Qti\CJBC 1 "** 

# } 

# £M •f i $-/<?*£ /

.5 .P. 4 ATTENDANC E Environmenta l Protectio n Agnec y Fue l an d Fue l Additiv e Registratio n Publi c Hearing Septembe r 26 , 199 0 Name 

## 1 . y[pjr^^eJM

%6f^^jQ

9 . v7^u nrU/rA^Lu 

## 10. faouftAOitJ
12 . <£rOm*/

s£-f-&cLS<L
14 . 77*> i f*\eye.r

### 15 . T>£ , k ^ t*UAr~\2 Company/Organizatio n



## Fo£b Moroe Co*

ArT-OCO A A>fig / C 4 A / ('Extol€w.P. 5 ATTENDANC E Environmenta l Protectio n Agnec y Fue l an d Fue l Additiv e Registratio n Publi c Hearing Septembe r 26 , 199 0 Nam e



### 6./V . Tr UJ/*,l5.TTtZ 

# a ,JV" . 

# 7 . X X Kyif-ppe ^ 9 - /3.y / /w< ^

1 1 • «• > OsVY\- 0



# • l\M;cvioifr (5 ^ lie , is. A4<e#/

/ JTktn-f 1 3 1 4 

### Company/Organizatio n 

# A^k * ^P/M^//^7 ^

* S 7~&y&r# CU0ySc£«*


# Pr»«W ^ C*rr 

# £4*w ( 6/^ p
No. 12-5732.

#### Pierce *v.*North Carolina.

Ct. App. N. C. Certiorari denied.
^ is? -/S
JULY II. 3.013T * fr)el&via.^ez 14&rteLr>JejL 

## *COLfflT£>F £flimr/itLt JPPe«JS" HPCESVED 1

£/£/?/< ofAPPelia.it %'i^/s/ayh G0URTOFCRMNALAPPEAL! P*6* JSa/ 11 1 a 8 jyL g3 201S AbelAeosta,Cf@rk 1 include Hits hfiet seni at He £/\ma titn.e 1 £e>ni You. mY Pet/iter? foh %*scr£ti*6nnkY JQevIe*/ ie> Ji£k %u, \a/j ^A Ss (^y)2Jd-/i AesPecT //* LuApnevefr mY Peiftfsrj /s ^Sn&L/zeA, if Ygll caulA heiuf-n mY 

### JlPPevltX, i*/y)emG/umJv>y\ gPsTiwy? /u>A LTudge/nfni*' iLze Me-Pke 6wJY &*/>/** YAj?/ I've $£>Tand I w//V/ meed H?TM % Ms £2/Jute* (it is lotted. <l? pa&e /z) And *6oti' Bless Yeu.. 

## ^/)Me.lahfaJe.<; U*^nn-Jr*

2061 S. tryi'ttf to/Live,
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                    DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                               37,026
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        29,414
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                          10,981
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     85,068
<PP&E>                                              585,356
<DEPRECIATION>                                      229,910
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      518,134
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                54,230
<BONDS>                                              84,535
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                59,837
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                  0
<OTHER-SE>                                          145,678
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        518,134
<SALES>                                             210,345
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    229,028
<CGS>                                               185,344
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       185,344
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     42,825
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    3,090
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (2,231)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          1,493
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (3,724)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (3,724)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (1.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (1.08)



</TABLE>