alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2022158EN.01001201.xml

| 11.4.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 158/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.4.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 158/12

---

Action brought on 25 February 2022 — Hungary v Commission

(Case T-104/22)

(2022/C 158/15)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Parties

Applicant: Hungary (represented by: M. Z. Fehér and G. Koós, acting as Agents)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the Commission’s decision of 14 December 2021 reviewing the objections raised by Hungary against disclosure, in relation to the confirmatory application GESTDEM 2021/2808, which is aimed at ensuring public access to documents originating from Hungary; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the Commission’s decision of 14 December 2021 reviewing the objections raised by Hungary against disclosure, in relation to the confirmatory application GESTDEM 2021/2808, which is aimed at ensuring public access to documents originating from Hungary;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In the contested decision, the Commission granted partial public access to the documents requested by the applicant, even though the Hungarian authorities had expressly invoked the exception relating to the protection of the decision-making process laid down in Article 4(3) of Regulation No 1049/2001, (1) and the Commission had accepted this in the present case until the confirmatory application was made.

The Hungarian government claims that the Commission’s interpretation in the contested decision is not only contrary to the Commission’s previous practice and the case-law of the Court of Justice, but is also seriously detrimental to cooperation between the Commission and the managing authorities of the Member States. The Hungarian government — in addition to arguing that there is decision-making of an EU institution in relation to the amendment of operational programmes, since the Commission approves those amendments, and that the exception in Article 4(3) of Regulation No 1049/2001 is therefore applicable — submits that the particularity of the present procedure is that, under the system of shared management, the decision taken by the Member State is in fact subject to the strict supervision of the Commission. Although, formally, it is a decision of a Member State authority, the Commission has a demonstrable influence over it, and it is therefore all the more unacceptable that the exception in question does not protect such a decision. The exception laid down in Article 4(3) of Regulation No 1049/2001 is also intended to protect the decision-making of Member State authorities.

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43).

---
#### LEONARDO NOGUEIRA *v.*COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

(AC 33760)

DiPentima, C. J., and Lavine and Robinson, Js.

Argued April 22

officially released May 7, 2013

Per Curiam.

The appeal is dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 55 (Friday, March 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 13603]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-7164]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. EG93-48-000]


Haralson Generating Company, L.P.; Notice of Surrender of Exempt 
Wholesale Generator Status

March 17, 1997.
    Take notice that on March 11, 1997, pursuant to section 365.7 of 
the Commission's regulations, 18 CFR 365.7, Haralson Generating 
Company, L.P. filed notification that it surrenders its status as an 
exempt wholesale generator under section 32(a)(1) of the Public Utility 
Holding Company Act of 1935, as amended.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-7164 Filed 3-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 24


                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

              Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended
                               December 31, 2001


The  undersigned  directors of the following  companies (each  respectively  the
"Company")

          Company                             State of Incorporation

  AEP Generating Company                               Ohio
  Appalachian Power Company                          Virginia
  Central Power and Light Company                     Texas
  Columbus Southern Power Company                      Ohio
  Kentucky Power Company                             Kentucky
  Ohio Power Company                                   Ohio
  Public Service Company of Oklahoma                 Oklahoma
  Southwestern Electric Power Company                Delaware
  West Texas Utilities Company                        Texas

do hereby constitute and appoint E. LINN DRAPER,  JR., ARMANDO A. PENA and SUSAN
TOMASKY,  and each of them, their  attorneys-in-fact  and agents, to execute for
them,  and in their names,  and in any and all of their  capacities,  the Annual
Report of the  Company on Form 10-K,  pursuant  to Section 13 of the  Securities
Exchange Act of 1934,  for the fiscal year ended  December 31, 2001, and any and
all  amendments  thereto,  and to file the same,  with all exhibits  thereto and
other  documents  in  connection  therewith,  with the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission,  granting unto said  attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them,
full power and  authority  to do and  perform  every act and thing  required  or
necessary to be done,  as fully to all intents and  purposes as the  undersigned
might or could do in  person,  hereby  ratifying  and  confirming  all that said
attorneys-in-fact  and agents,  or any of them,  may  lawfully do or cause to be
done by virtue hereof.

     IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the undersigned  have signed these presents this 21st
day of February, 2002.


   /s/ E. Linn Draper, Jr.              /s/ Thomas V. Shockley, III


   /s/ Henry W. Fayne                   /s/ Susan Tomasky


   /s/ Armando A. Pena                  /s/ J. H. Vipperman


   /s/ Robert P. Powers
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                         Section 1350 CFO Certification

I, Kevin J. Brown, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Robbins &
Myers, Inc. ("the Company"), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

    1. The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended August
       31, 2003 (the "Annual Report") fully complies with the requirements of
       section 33(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
       78m or 78c(d)) and

    2. The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
       material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
       the Company.

Dated: November 18, 2003

                                         /s/ Kevin J. Brown
                                         ---------------------------------
                                         Kevin J. Brown
                                         Vice President and
                                         Chief Financial Officer

72
Exhibit No. 11

                      HARDING LAWSON ASSOCIATES GROUP, INC.

                       Computation of Net Income Per Share
                      (In thousands, except per share data)
                                   (Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                        Three Months Ended                 Six Months Ended
                                                           November 30,                      November 30,
                                                       1999           1998              1999             1998
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                   <C>            <C>               <C>              <C>
Weighted average basic shares outstanding              4,998          4,835             4,975            4,859
Net effect of dilutive stock options
     based on the treasury stock method                  165             19               177               61
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Total                                                  5,163          4,854             5,152            4,920
===================================================================================================================

Net income                                            $1,569         $  139            $2,719           $1,152
===================================================================================================================

Basic net income per share                            $ 0.31         $ 0.03            $ 0.55           $ 0.24
===================================================================================================================

Diluted net income per share                          $ 0.30         $ 0.03            $ 0.53           $ 0.23
===================================================================================================================
</TABLE>


                                       17
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             109
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,138
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (72)
<INVENTORY>                                        997
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,490
<PP&E>                                           7,097
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,119)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   9,786
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,212
<BONDS>                                            561
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            37
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,786
<SALES>                                          2,442
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,442
<CGS>                                            1,729
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      649
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    36
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  10
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     17
<INCOME-TAX>                                        18
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (1)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (1)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Anthony Dewayne BOOKER, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Stephen RANCOURT, Wichita County Assistant District Attorney, Defendant-Appellee

No. 17-10456

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed March 2, 2018

Anthony Dewayne Booker, Pro Se

Before SMITH, WIENER, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Anthony Dewayne Booker moves this court for authorization to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) following the district court’s certification that any appeal would not be taken in good faith pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). By seeking leave to proceed IFP in this court, Booker is challenging the ■ district court’s certification. *See Baugh v. Taylor,*117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997).

Booker’s notice of appeal was filed after the magistrate judge issued his report and recommendation but before the district court had issued its final ruling. A prema*395ture notice of appeal is valid only when the order appealed from announces a decision that would be appealable if it were immediately followed by the entry of judgment. *FirsTier Mortgage Co. v. Investors Mortgage Ins. Co.,*498 U.S. 269, 276-77, 111 S.Ct. 648, 112 L.Ed.2d 743 (1991); *see also United States v. Cooper,*135 F.3d 960, 963 (5th Cir. 1998). The magistrate judge could not immediately enter a final judgment of the district court, and that judge’s report and recommendation was not appealable. *See Cooper,*135 F.3d at 962-63. As such, Booker’s notice of appeal was insufficient to confer jurisdiction on this court. *See id.*

Accordingly, Booker’s request for leave to proceed IFP on appeal is denied, and the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Booker’s motion to appoint counsel is denied.

APPEAL ■ DISMISSED; MOTIONS DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
# File Information

A6 - Consumption by Model Year

Std Errors for A6

N Cells for A6

# A6 - Consumption by Model Year

# Std Errors for A6

# N Cells for A6
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8's) pertaining to the 1984 Stock Option Plan (No. 2-98841, Post
Effective Amendment No. 1, dated November 23, 1988), Stock Option Plan for
Non-Employee Directors (No. 33-43625, dated November 1, 1991), 1994 Directors'
Stock Compensation Plan (No. 33-84032, dated September 13, 1994), Robbins &
Myers, Inc. Employee Savings Plan (No. 33-61893, dated August 17, 1995), Robbins
& Myers, Inc. 1994 Long-term Incentive Plan (No. 333-00291, dated January 19,
1996), Robbins & Myers, Inc. 1995 Stock Option Plan for Non-employee Directors
(No. 333-00293, dated January 19, 1996), Robbins & Myers, Inc. Savings Plan for
Union Employees (No. 333-00289, dated February 7, 1996), Robbins & Myers, Inc.
1999 Long-term Incentive Plan (No. 333-35856, dated April 28, 2000), the
Registration Statement (Form S-3) pertaining to Investor Stock Purchase Plan
(No. 333-31235, dated July 14, 1997) and Post Effective Amendment No. 1, dated
August 20, 2003, to the Registration Statement (Form S-3, No. 333-106780)
pertaining to an offering of securities to be designated by the Company of our
report dated October 5, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of Robbins & Myers, Inc. and Subsidiaries, included in
this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended August 31, 2004.

                                                        /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Dayton, Ohio
November 4, 2004

                                       59
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA- 2010 - 0277 Directorate Identifier: 2009NM217AD

767 -57A0117 IN 01 --- 10/8/09 767 -57A0117 IN 02 --- 11/5/09 767 -57A0117 IN 03 --- 3/25/10

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federa l Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 03/05/2008
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 52 (Tuesday, March 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 12822]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6762]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. TM97-1-131-000]


KO Transmission Company; Notice of Tariff Filing

March 12, 1997.
    Take notice that on March 4, 1997, KO Transmission Company (KO 
Transmission) tendered for filing to become part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Original Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff sheet 
bearing a proposed effective date of April 1, 1997.

Second Revised Sheet No. 10

    KO Transmission states that the purpose of the filing is to revise 
its fuel retainage percentage consistent with Section 24 of the General 
Terms and Conditions of its Tariff. According to KO Transmission, 
Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation (Columbia) operates and maintains 
the KO Transmission facilities pursuant to the Operating Agreement 
referenced in its Tariff at Original Sheet No. 7. Pursuant to that 
Operating Agreement, Columbia retains certain volumes associated with 
gas transported on behalf of KO Transmission. On March 4, 1997, 
Columbia notified KO Transmission that under the terms of the Operating 
Agreement KO Transmission will be subject to a 0.46% retainage. 
Accordingly, KO Transmission states that the instant filing tracks this 
fuel percentage.
    Any person desiring to be heard or protest this filing should file 
a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-6762 Filed 3-17-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 11-11118.

#### Wallace *v.*Cohen et al.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 13

- 00609

- CV

Herlinda ARNOLD

, Appellant

v.

WORLDWIDE CLINICAL T RIALS a/k/a WCT CORPORATION

, Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 10, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 381779 Honorable Jason Pulliam, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE

, JUSTICE BARNARD , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is REVERSED, and the cause is REMANDED to the trial court for furthe r proceedings. It is

ORDERED that appellant, Herlinda Arnold, recover her costs of this appeal from appellee, Worldwide Clinical Trials Early Phase Services, LLC.

SIGNED August 13, 2014.

_____________________________ Catherine Stone, Chief Justice
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 52 (Tuesday, March 18, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 12776]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6753]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement

30 CFR Part 914

[SPATS No. IN-138-FOR; Amendment No. 95-3 II]


Indiana Regulatory Program

AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM), 
Interior.

ACTION: Proposed rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: OSM is correcting errors in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION 
section, under II. Description of the Proposed Amendment, for a 
proposed rule announcing receipt of a proposed amendment to the Indiana 
regulatory program that was published on Tuesday, February 18, 1997 (62 
FR 7192).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles F. McDaniel, Acting Director, 
Indianapolis Field Office, Telephone: (317) 226-6700.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

II. Description of the Proposed Amendment

    On page 7192 of the February 18, 1997, Federal Register, the 
following corrections are made:
    1. In the second column, under 2. 310 IAC 12-3-131 Small Operator 
Assistance; Eligibility for Assistance, beginning in the fourth line, 
the words ``by redesignating subsections (20(A)'' should read ``by 
redesignating subsections (2)(B) as (2)(A)''.
    2. In the third column, under 4. 310 IAC 12-3-132.5 Small Operator 
Assistance; Application Approval and Notice, the two paragraphs under 
this heading were included in the discussion of this proposed 
regulation revision in error. The following information should have 
been included in the discussion:
    Indiana proposes to clarify the application approval and notice 
requirements for its small operator assistance program.
    3. In the third column, under 5. 310 IAC 12-3-133 Small Operator 
Assistance; Program Services and Data Requirements, the following two 
paragraphs should have been included in the discussion of this proposed 
regulation revision following the existing text:
    Indiana proposes to add new subsection (c) to allow data collection 
and analysis to proceed concurrently with the development of mining and 
reclamation plans by the operator.
    Indiana proposes to add new subsection (d) to require that data 
collected under its small operator assistance program be made available 
to the public and that the program administrator develop procedures for 
interstate coordination and exchange of data.

    Dated: March 10, 1997.
Brent Wahlquist,
Regional Director, Mid-Continent Regional Coordinating Center.
[FR Doc. 97-6753 Filed 3-17-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-05-M
<PAGE>

Exhibit 23.1
                                          
                                          
                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
Reuter Manufacturing, Inc. on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-15293, 33-33107, 33-44304,
33-44281 and 333-61927) of our report, which includes an explanatory paragraph
addressing substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going
concern, dated February 26, 1999, on our audits of the financial statements and
the financial statement schedule of Reuter Manufacturing, Inc. as of December
31, 1998 and 1997, and for the years then ended, which report is included in
this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB.





                                   /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
                                   PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP



Minneapolis, MN
March 22, 1999