alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Table 2. Average Annual Coal Transportation Costs, By Primary Transport Mode and Supply Region

(2022 dollars per ton)

Coal Supply Region 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 

Northern Appalachia $20.13 $20.83 $21.94 $23.83 $25.96 $27.85 $26.44 $25.44 $24.47 $23.54 $22.21 

Central Appalachia $27.56 $26.08 $27.89 $27.99 $28.28 $28.73 $28.69 $27.66 $26.19 $26.59 $26.56 

Southern Appalachia $21.17 $19.05 $20.80 WWWWWW ‐ W

Illinois Basin $10.26 $11.27 $14.56 $18.52 $19.19 $18.93 $18.53 $19.70 $18.67 $19.02 $17.99 Powder River Basin $22.32 $20.85 $22.34 $24.95 $25.72 $26.67 $26.86 $24.93 $23.79 $24.04 $24.03 Uinta Region $32.91 $24.66 $26.68 $25.64 $23.95 $19.24 $19.60 $14.18 $15.71 $14.35 $12.65 

Railroad Total [1] $22.74 $21.24 $22.75 $24.83 $25.29 $25.77 $25.83 $24.27 $23.13 $23.29 $23.09 

WaterwayNorthern Appalachia $6.48 $5.69 $4.76 $5.01 $4.76 $4.84 $5.29 $4.33 $4.21 $4.14 $4.30 Central Appalachia $8.17 $8.47 $7.46 $7.06 $6.97 $7.69 $7.63 $8.26 $7.15 $5.85 $5.33 

Southern Appalachia $5.61 $5.20 $5.58 $4.70 W $5.61 W W W ‐‐

Illinois Basin $9.00 $8.65 $9.41 $10.30 $9.26 $8.75 $8.58 $7.65 $7.06 $6.56 $6.76 

Powder River Basin $14.67 $15.25 $26.04 $24.93 ‐ ‐ $22.74 W W W ‐ Uinta Region $15.53 $14.01 $47.50 W ‐‐‐ W W ‐‐

Waterway Total [1] $8.47 $8.10 $8.20 $8.10 $6.89 $6.88 $7.18 $6.12 $5.69 $5.26 $5.38 TruckNorthern Appalachia $8.97 $5.53 $6.75 $7.12 $7.61 $7.27 $7.41 $8.12 $8.08 $9.00 $10.92 Central Appalachia $28.19 $23.78 $39.09 W W $22.12 $10.16 WWWWSouthern Appalachia $1.07 WWWW ‐ W ‐‐‐‐Illinois Basin $8.10 $5.96 $5.96 $6.95 $6.89 $8.01 $7.40 $6.22 $5.87 $6.29 $6.15 

Powder River Basin $14.29 $11.23 $22.67 $8.42 W W $6.29 WWWW

Uinta Region $3.67 $5.69 $6.12 $6.44 $7.66 $7.41 $8.01 $6.66 $5.70 WWTruck Total [1] $8.05 $6.57 $7.59 $6.93 $7.51 $7.91 $7.55 $7.02 $6.67 $7.18 $7.87 

RailroadSource: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Form EIA‐923, "Power Plant Operations Report."

W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.

1 Value for Dollars per Ton reflects weighted average of all shipments; Value for Number of Shipments reflects sum of shipments.

Notes: Rates are based on a weighted average of the difference between the commodity cost and total delivered cost of coal shipments to plants in the electric power sector. In addition, the rates are based on the primary tran

mode selected by a plant's owner or operator so may include other secondary or tertiary modes. Values are presented in 2022 dollars. For the composition of coal basins, refer to the definition of "coal‐producing regions" in EIA

glossary at www.eia.gov/tools/glossary.
#### JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION *v.*SHERI A. SPEER

(AC 35324)

Robinson, Sheldon and Borden, Js.

Argued September 24

officially released October 22, 2013

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed and the case is remanded for the purpose of setting new law days.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 61 (Monday, March 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 15208]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-8057]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

PRESIDENT'S COMMISSION ON CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION


Public Meeting

ACTION: Atlanta PCCIP public meeting.

TIME AND DATE: 9:00 a.m.-12:00 p.m., Friday, April 18, 1997.

PLACE: Inforum, 250 William Street, Atlanta, GA 30303.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Advice or comments of any concerned citizen, 
group or activity on assuring America's critical infrastructures.

    Note: A sign-language interpreter will be available for the 
hearing-impaired.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Nelson McCouch, Public Affairs 
Director, (703) 696-9395, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8fe1eae3fce0e1a1e2ecece0faece7cfffecece6ffa1e8e0f9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="91fff4fde2feffbffcf2f2fee4f2f9d1e1f2f2f8e1bff6fee7">[email protected]</span></a>.
Jim Kurtz,
Executive Secretariat, President's Commission on Critical 
Infrastructure Protection.
[FR Doc. 97-8057 Filed 3-28-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3110-$$-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
S95A0907.

#### DRANE v. THE STATE.

(461 SE2d 224)

Fletcher, Presiding Justice.

A jury convicted Charles T. Drane of the shooting death of Melissa Wilson.1 Drane challenges the admission into evidence of two *664statements that his common-law wife Patricia Saunders made to a Georgia Bureau of Investigation agent. We conclude that the trial court properly admitted the statements as an exception to the hearsay rule because there was sufficient evidence of their reliability. We affirm.

Decided September 11, 1995.

*Henderson & Henderson, David C. Walker,*for appellant.

*Dupont K. Cheney, District Attorney, J. Stephen Archer, Assistant District Attorney, Michael J. Bowers, Attorney General, Susan V. Boleyn, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richard J. Warren, Assistant Attorney General,*for appellee.

1. Hearsay evidence may be admitted out of necessity. 2 To qualify as an exception to the hearsay rule, there must be a necessity for the exception and a guaranty of the testimony’s trustworthiness.3 The state established a need for Saunders’ statements after she asserted her privilege not to testify against her husband.4 In addition, the state provided sufficient evidence of the statements’ reliability. She conveyed the information to a GBI agent during the official investigation into Wilson’s disappearance and death. Saunders never disavowed her statements, but instead testified at a pre-trial hearing that she answered the investigator’s questions honestly and tried to remember everything. Based on these factors, the trial court properly concluded that the statements were admissible as an exception to the hearsay rule without conducting an additional hearing on their reliability.5

2. Reviewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the jury’s verdict, we hold that a rational trier of fact could have found Drane guilty of the murder for which he was convicted beyond a reasonable doubt. *Jackson v. Virginia,*443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

1

 The crime was committed on June 15, 1993. The grand jury indicted Drane for murder on November 2, 1993. A jury returned a verdict of guilty on January 24, 1994, and the trial court sentenced him to life imprisonment. The trial court denied Drane’s motion for a new *664trial on January 13, 1995, and Drane filed a notice of appeal on January 31, 1995. The case was docketed on March 8, 1995, and submitted on briefs without oral argument on May 1, 1995.

2

 OCGA § 24-3-1 (1982).

3

*Higgs v. State,*256 Ga. 606, 607 (351 SE2d 448) (1987).

4

 OCGA § 24-9-23.

5

 See *Reynolds v. State,*257 Ga. 725 (363 SE2d 249) (1988).
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    Exhibit 24.1

                              ROBBINS & MYERS, INC.

                            LIMITED POWER OF ATTORNEY

         WHEREAS, Robbins & Myers, Inc. (the "Company") intends to file with the
Securities and Exchange Commission its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended August 31, 2000:

         NOW, THEREFORE, each of the undersigned in his capacity as a director
of the Company hereby appoints Gerald L. Connelly his true and lawful
attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution,
to execute in his name, place and stead, the Company's Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended August 31, 2000, (including any amendment to such
report) and any and all other instruments necessary or incidental in connection
therewith, and to file the same with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Said attorney shall have full power and authority to do and perform in the name
and on behalf of the undersigned, in the aforesaid capacity, every act
whatsoever necessary or desirable to be done, as fully to all intents and
purposes as the undersigned might or could do in person. The undersigned hereby
ratifies and approves the act of said attorney.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this instrument this
21st day of November, 2000.

                                             /s/ Maynard H. Murch, IV
                                             ------------------------
                                             Maynard H. Murch, IV

                                             /s/ Robert J. Kegerreis
                                             ------------------------
                                             Robert J. Kegerreis

                                             /s/ Thomas P. Loftis
                                             ------------------------
                                             Thomas P. Loftis

                                             /s/ William D. Manning, Jr.
                                             ---------------------------
                                             William D. Manning, Jr.

                                             /s/ Jerome F. Tatar
                                             ------------------------
                                             Jerome F. Tatar

                                             /s/John N. Taylor, Jr.
                                             ----------------------
                                             John N. Taylor, Jr.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> BD
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                       3,510,850
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,761,129
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                  0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                                0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                                  0
<PP&E>                                       2,118,833
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,461,278
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<PAYABLES>                                   5,649,181
<REPOS-SOLD>                                         0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                                  0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                                   0
<LONG-TERM>                                    615,674
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,500,402
<COMMON>                                       271,167
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,143,438
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,461,278
<TRADING-REVENUE>                                    0
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                           106,234
<COMMISSIONS>                               10,638,298
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                        0
<FEE-REVENUE>                                1,268,428
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,699
<COMPENSATION>                               7,964,596
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,143,332
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,006,530
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,006,530
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .18
        

</TABLE>
No. 12-5685.

No. 12-5740.

No. 12-5790.

#### Freeman *v.*United States; McGarity *v.*United States; and Lakey *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 669 F. 3d 1218.
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 132 (Monday, July 11, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 40713]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-17314]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Agency Information Collection Extension

AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE), pursuant to the Paperwork 
Reduction Act of 1995), intends to extend for three years, an 
information collection request with the Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB). Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the extended collection of 
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of 
the agency, including whether the information shall have practical 
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the 
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the 
methodology and assumptions used; (c) ways to enhance the quality, 
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways 
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, 
including through the use of automated collection techniques or other 
forms of information technology.

DATES: Comments regarding this proposed information collection must be 
received on or before September 9, 2011. If you anticipate difficulty 
in submitting comments within that period, contact the person listed 
below as soon as possible.

ADDRESSES: Written comments may be sent to John T. Lucas, GC-62, U.S. 
Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC 
20585, or by fax at (202) 586-2805 or by e-mail at 
john.t.lucas@hq.doe.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John T. Lucas, at the address listed 
above.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This information collection request 
contains: (1) OMB No. 1910-0800; (2) Information Collection Request 
Title: Legal Collections; (3) Type of Review: renewal; (4) Purpose: To 
continue to maintain DOE oversight of responsibilities relating to DOE 
and contractor invention reporting and related matters; (5) Annual 
Estimated Number of Respondents: 1817; (6) Annual Estimated Number of 
Total Responses: 1817; (7) Annual Estimated Number of Burden Hours: 
15,127; (8) Annual Estimated Reporting and Recordkeeping Cost Burden: 
1,034,525.

    Statutory Authority:  42 U.S.C. 5908 (a), (b) and (c); 10 CFR 
Part 781; 10 CFR Part 784.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on July 5, 2011.
John T. Lucas,
Assistant General Counsel for Technology Transfer and Intellectual 
Property, U.S. Department of Energy.
[FR Doc. 2011-17314 Filed 7-8-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
```

                                                                                        Exhibit 32.1

                                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                       18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                            SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of The St. Lawrence Seaway  Corporation (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the year ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Joel M. Greenblatt,  Chairman of the Board of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities
    Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Joel M. Greenblatt
-----------------------------
Joel M. Greenblatt
Chairman of the Board
June 28, 2005
```

----
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 132 

Providing for the consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 109) recognizing 

the duty of the Federal Government to create a Green New Deal. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2019 

Mr. HICE of Georgia submitted the following resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for the consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 

109) recognizing the duty of the Federal Government 

to create a Green New Deal. 

1 Resolved, That immediately upon adoption of this res2 olution the House shall, without intervention of any point 

3 of order, consider the resolution (H. Res. 109) recognizing 

4 the duty of the Federal Government to create a Green 

5 New Deal. The resolution shall be considered as read. The 

6 previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 

7 resolution and preamble to adoption without intervening 

8 motion or demand for division of the question except one 

9 hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the MaVerDate Sep 11 2014 02:00 Feb 15, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR132.IH HR132

pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 132 IH 

1 jority Leader and the Minority Leader or their respective 

2 designees. 

3 SEC. 2. Clause 1(c) of rule XIX shall not apply to 

4 the consideration of H. Res. 109. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 10.9


 


Reference: Renewal of Employment Agreement dated June 1, 2020 (the
 “Employment Agreement”)


 


By signing below both parties agree to renew the term of the Employment
Agreement until June 1, 2022. Except as expressly set forth herein, all terms of the Employment Agreement remain in full force and effect,
and constitute the legal, valid, binding and enforceable obligations of the parties thereto.


 


Executive:


 





	By:	/s/ Wynn Hui	 
	Wynn Hui	 



 


 


Intelligent Living Application Group Inc.


 


	By:	/s/ Bong Lau	 





	Name:	 Bong Lau	 
	Title:	Chief Executive Officer
No. 12-5203.

#### Howell *v.*California.

Ct. App. Cal., 5th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 6 (Thursday, January 9, 1997)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 1381]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-712]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 6 / Thursday, January 9, 1997 / 
Presidential Documents

[[Page 1381]]


                Presidential Determination No. 97-15 of December 27, 
                1996

                
Assistance Program for the New Independent States 
                of the Former Soviet Union

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State

                Pursuant to subsection (d) under the heading 
                ``Assistance for the New Independent States of the 
                Former Soviet Union'' in Title II of the Foreign 
                Operations, Export Financing, and Related Programs 
                Appropriations Act, 1997 (as enacted in Public Law 104-
                208), I hereby determine that it is in the national 
                security interest of the United States to make 
                available funds appropriated under that heading without 
                regard to the restriction in that subsection.

                You are authorized and directed to notify the Congress 
                of this determination and to arrange for its 
                publication in the Federal Register.

                    (Presidential Sig.)<Clinton1><Clinton2>

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, December 27, 1996.

[FR Doc. 97-712
Filed 1-8-97; 9:57 am]
Billing code 4710-10-P
No. 12-5633.

#### Kuchna *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**REPORTAND CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

 

TheBoard of DirectorsRockof Ages Corporation:

The audit referred to in our report dated February 22, 2005, except for Notes 8,14 and 16 as to which the date is March 30, 2007, included the related financialstatement schedule as of December 31, 2004, and for the year then ended. Thisfinancial statement schedule is the responsibility of the Company's management.Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this financial statement schedulebased on our audit. In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, whenconsidered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as awhole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forththerein.

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.333-45617) on Form S-8 of Rock of Ages Corporation of our reports dated February22, 2005, except for Notes 8, 14 and 16 as to which the date is March 30, 2007,with respect to the consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equityand comprehensive loss, and cash flows of Rock of Ages Corporation andsubsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2004, and the related financialstatement schedule, which reports appear in the December 31, 2006 annual reporton Form 10-K of Rock of Ages Corporation.

 

/s/KPMG LLP

Burlington, VermontMarch 30, 2007

----

**EXHIBIT 23.2**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENTREGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

 

Wehave issued our report dated March 30, 2007 (which report expresses anunqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to theapplication of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158 as ofDecember 31, 2006)  accompanying the consolidatedfinancial statements included in the Annual Report of Rock of Ages Corporation onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.  We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of Rockof Ages Corporation on Form S-8 (File No. 333-45617, effective February 5,1998 and  File No. 333-128474, effective September 21, 2005).

 

/s/Grant Thornton LLP 

Boston, MassachusettsMarch 30, 2007

----