alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                      R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO HOLDINGS, INC.
                                  SUBSIDIARIES


NAME OF ENTITY                                         PLACE OF INCORPORATION
--------------                                         ----------------------

R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Holdings, Inc.                   Delaware
Arjay Equipment Corporation                            Delaware
FHS LLC                                                Delaware
GMB, Inc.                                              North Carolina
Northern Brands International, Inc.                    Delaware
R. J. Reynolds Smoke Shop, Inc.                        Delaware
R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.                             Delaware
R .J. Reynolds Tobacco Company                         New Jersey
R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, S.L.                   Spain
R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Foreign Sales Corporation       U.S. Virgin Islands
R. J. Reynolds Tobacco International, Inc.             Delaware
Reynolds Technologies, Inc.                            Delaware
RJR Group, Inc., The                                   Delaware
RJR Merchandise Marketing Company                      Delaware
RJR Realty Relocation Services, Inc.                   North Carolina
RJR Sales Co.                                          Delaware
RJR Smoke Shop, Inc.                                   Delaware
RJR Technical Company                                  Delaware
S.F. Imports, Inc.                                     Delaware
Smoker's Connection, Inc., The                         Delaware
Sports Marketing Enterprises, Inc.*                    North Carolina
Targacept, Inc.                                        Delaware
R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company Foundation**            North Carolina

*        Nameholder
**       Partnership/Joint Venture/Trust
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 59 (Thursday, March 27, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 14689]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-7723]



[[Page 14689]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Public Health Service
National Institutes of Health


Office of Research on Women's Health; Cancellation of Meeting--
``Beyond Hunt Valley: Research on Women's Health for the 21st Century''

    Notice is hereby given that the Office of Research on Women's 
Health, Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health, meeting 
scheduled to be held on April 5, 6, and 7, 1997, at the Pyramid Crowne 
Plaza Hotel, Albuquerque, New Mexico and published in Federal Register 
Notice (62 FR 8033) on February 21, 1997 has been cancelled.

    Dated: March 18, 1997.
Ruth L. Kirschstein,
Deputy Director, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-7723 Filed 3-26-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 57 (Tuesday, March 25, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 14179]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-7512]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

Commonwealth of Kentucky; Declaration of Disaster #2933; 
Amendment #1

    In accordance with a notice from the Federal Emergency Management 
Agency, dated March 12, 1997, the above-numbered Declaration is hereby 
amended to include the Counties of Anderson, Butler, Crittenden, 
Fayette, Floyd, Jessamine, Larue, Lawrence, Livingston, Mercer, 
McCracken, Montgomery, Morgan, Pike, Robertson, Rowan, Union, Webster, 
and Woodford in the Commonwealth of Kentucky a disaster area due to 
damages caused by severe storms, tornadoes, and flooding beginning on 
March 1, 1997 and continuing.
    In addition, applications for economic injury loans from small 
businesses located in the following contiguous counties may be filed 
until the specified date at the previously designated location: 
Ballard, Carlisle, Edmonson, Garrard, Graves, Green, Johnson, Logan, 
Knott, Letcher, Madison, Magoffin, Marshall, Martin, Taylor, and Warren 
in the Commonwealth of Kentucky; Hardin, Massac, Pope, and Pulaski in 
the State of Illinois; Buchanon, Dickenson, and Wise in the 
Commonwealth of Virginia; and McDowell in the State of West Virginia. 
Any counties contiguous to the above-named primary counties and not 
listed herein have been covered under a separate declaration for the 
same occurrence.
    The numbers assigned to this disaster for economic injury are 
943900 for Illinois; 944000 for Virginia; and 944100 for West Virginia.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008.)

    Dated: March 17, 1997.
Bernard Kulik,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 97-7512 Filed 3-24-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
No. 12-5870.

#### Figueroa *v.*United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
| (1)   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  DATE:      May 4, 2010 |        /s/ James E. Rouse                 |
|------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|
|                         | James      E. Rouse                            |
|                         | President      andChief      Executive Officer |

----
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 32g

        Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18
                            of the United States Code

      I, E. James Ferland, Chief Executive Officer of PSEG Energy Holdings
L.L.C., to the best of my knowledge, certify that (i) the Annual Report of PSEG
Energy Holdings L.L.C. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the PSEG Energy Holdings L.L.C.

                                    /s/ E. James Ferland
                                  -----------------------------------------
                                    E. James Ferland
                                    PSEG Energy Holdings L.L.C.
                                    Chief Executive Officer
                                    February 27, 2006
**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. §1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1)   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  DATE:                November 14, 2007 |  /s/                David A. Garrison                                                                      |
|----------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                         | David                A. Garrison                                                                                |
|                                         | Executive                Vice President                andChief                Financial                Officer |

*A      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been      provided to Arrhythmia Research Technology, Inc. and will be retained by      Arrhythmia Research Technology, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*

----
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 51 (Monday, March 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 12678]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6613]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Aviation Security Advisory Committee Meeting

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration.

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Aviation Security 
Advisory Committee.

DATES: The meeting will be held March 26, 1997, from 9:00 a.m. to 1 
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held in the MacCracken Room, tenth 
floor, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW, 
Washington, D.C. 20591, telephone 202-267-7622.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10 (a) (2) of the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub.L.92-463; 5 U.S.C. App.11), notice 
is hereby given of a meeting of the Aviation Security Advisory 
Committee to be held March 26, 1997, in the MacCracken Room, tenth 
floor, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., 
Washington, D.C. The agenda for the meeting will include: Cargo 
Security, Explosive Detection Training Programs, Profiling and Bag 
Match Updates, and Status of the Universal Access System Working Group. 
Attendance at the March 26, 1997, meeting is open to the public but is 
limited to space available. Members of the public may address the 
committee only with the written permission of the chair, which should 
be arranged in advance. The chair may entertain public comment if, in 
its judgment, doing so will not disrupt the orderly progress of the 
meeting and will not be unfair to any other person. Members of the 
public are welcome to present written material to the committee at any 
time. Persons wishing to present statements or obtain information 
should contact the Office of the Associate Administrator for Civil 
Aviation Security, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, D.C. 
20591, telephone 202-267-7622.

    Issued in Washington, D.C. on March 11, 1997.
Karl Shrum,
Director of Civil Aviation Security Policy and Planning.
[FR Doc. 97-6613 Filed 3-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
|
|

|Energy Market and Economic Impacts of H.R. 2454, the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009                                                                            
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Figure 21.  Buildings Sector Delivered Energy Consumption by Fuel in Main ACESA (quadrillion Btu).  Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800).
|Figure 21.  Buildings Sector Delivered Energy Consumption by Fuel in Main ACESA (quadrillion Btu).  Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800).
|Figure 21.  Buildings Sector Delivered Energy Consumption by Fuel in Main ACESA (quadrillion Btu).  Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800).
#### Anderson v. State

111,889

04/21/2016

Denied.

Unpublished
No. 11-10774.

#### Rogers *v.*Dickinson, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
No. 12-5411.

#### Reyes *v.*California.

Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
#### State v. Driscoll

111,529

02/09/2016

Denied.

Unpublished
, 

v . 

CAPTAIN BRADLEY BRAGG, LEWIS 

& CLARK COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, 

Respondent. 

State of 

ORDER 

Self-represented Petitioner Jared DeCaccia seeks a writ of rnandarnus from this 

Court. DeCaccia claims that he developed multiple infections while being held in the 

Lewis and Clark County Detention Center (LCCDC). He states that "[t]his facility ignored 

my pleas to have rnedical treatment for 2 weeks." He further states that his initial infection 

led to a second infection, and that his foot was oozing fluid, rnaking it difficult to walk. He 

further contends that the LCCDC withheld his antibiotic medication, after he received 

treatment, and that he had to pay for the medication. DeCaccia alleges that his 

constitutional rights have been violated. 

A writ of mandate is specific and statutorily driven. Sections 27-26-101 through 

27-26-403, MCA. To state a claim for mandate, a party must show entitlement to the 

perforrnance of a clear legal duty by the party against whom the writ is directed and the 

absence of a plain, speedy, and adequate remedy at law. Section 27-26-102, MCA; Smith 

v. Missoula Co., 1999 MT 330, ¶ 28, 297 Mont. 368, 992 P.2d 834. 

Upon review, DeCaccia has not demonstrated the requirements for a writ of 

mandate. To the extent the petition alleges inadequate medical care, a writ of mandate is 

not the appropriate civil remedy. See Gates v. Missoula Cty. Comm'rs, 235 Mont. 261, 
not suitable in an original writ proceeding before this Court. Because conditions of 

confinement may be challenged in an ordinary civil rights action, DeCaccia has a plain and 

adequate remedy of filing a complaint in a state or federal district court. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that DeCaccia's Petition for Writ of Mandate is 

DENIED and DISMISSED. 

The Clerk of the Supreme Court is directed to provide a copy to counsel of record; 

to Captain Bradley Bragg, LCCDC; and to Jared DeCaccia personally. 

DATED this .1;) day of September, 2022. 

hief Justice 

2
#### JAVIER SANTANA *v.*COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

(AC 32432)

Lavine, Robinson and Peters, Js.

Submitted on briefs November 21

officially released December 17, 2013

Per Curiam.

The appeal is dismissed.
#### State v. Brown

111,778

12/14/2015

Denied.

Unpublished
S95A1105.

#### GRANT v. BYRD.

(461 SE2d 871)

Fletcher, Presiding Justice.

Michael Dennis Grant sought to file a petition for writ of mandamus directing the superior court clerk to correct documents sent to the state concerning time that Grant served in the county jail. The trial court concluded that the clerk did not have authority to compute time served by an inmate and denied the filing under OCGA § 9-15-2 (d). This appeal concerns whether the trial court properly determined that Grant’s pleading failed to present a justiciable issue of law or fact for which Grant could obtain relief against the clerk. We affirm.

1. OCGA § 9-15-2 (d) permits a trial court to deny the filing of a *685pleading if “the pleading shows on its face such a complete absence of any justiciable issue of law or fact that it cannot be reasonably believed that the court could grant any relief against any party named in the pleading.” Given this provision’s similarity in language to OCGA § 9-11-12 (b) (6), we adopt the same standard used in reviewing motions to dismiss and construe the pleading in the light most favorable to Grant as the losing party.1

Decided September 25, 1995.

Michael Dennis Grant, *pro se.*

*Sell & Melton, Joseph W. Popper, Jr., Robert D. McCullers,*for appellee.

2. Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy to compel a public officer to perform a required duty. Trial courts will grant mandamus only when there is a clear legal right to the relief sought or there is a gross abuse of discretion.2 Grant’s petition fails to meet either standard because state statutes impose no duty on a court clerk to compute or give credit for jail time. Rather, the defendant’s custodian prior to sentencing specifies the number of days that the defendant spent confined in jail3 and the custodial official after sentencing gives the defendant credit for those days.4 The clerk has two duties: (1) to make the custodian’s affidavit part of the trial record, and (2) to send a copy of the affidavit to the Department of Corrections or other authority that has custody of the defendant.5 Because the clerk had no duty to compute or give credit for the time Grant spent confined in the county jail, his petition shows no justiciable issue for which the trial court could grant relief against the clerk. Accordingly, the trial court properly disallowed the filing of Grant’s petition.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

1

 See *Alford v. Public Svc. Comm.,*262 Ga. 386, n. 2 (418 SE2d 13) (1992).

2

*Dougherty County v. Webb,*256 Ga. 474, 475 (350 SE2d 457) (1986).

3

 OCGA § 17-10-12 (a).

4

Id. (b) & (c).

5

 See id. (a)-(c).
No. 12-12.

#### Turrubiates *v.*Family Practice Associates of Western Kansas, LLC, et al.

Ct. App. Kan. Certiorari denied.
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1215 

Honoring the life and achievements of Lucretia Mott and the 140th 

anniversary of her death. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 12, 2020 

Ms. DEAN submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the life and achievements of Lucretia Mott and 

the 140th anniversary of her death. 

Whereas November 11, 2020, marks the 140th anniversary 

of the passing of Lucretia Mott in Cheltenham, Pennsylvania; 

Whereas Lucretia Mott was born in January 1793, in Nantucket, Massachusetts; 

Whereas, in 1833, Lucretia Mott was chosen as president of 

the Philadelphia Female Anti-Slavery Society after traveling around the country giving lectures on religion, slavery abolition, temperance, and peace; 

Whereas, in 1840, Lucretia Mott met Elizabeth Cady Stanton at a World Anti-Slavery Conference, and because of 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1215 IH 

their sex were denied the rights to participate, thus beginning their fights to advance the rights of women; 

Whereas, in 1848, Lucretia Mott and Elizabeth Cady Stanton launched the American women’s rights movement at 

the Seneca Falls Convention to discuss the social, civil, 

and religious rights of women; 

Whereas as a founder of the Seneca Falls Convention, 

Lucretia Mott, along with Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Martha C. Wright, and Mary Ann McClintock, wrote the 

Declaration of Sentiments, which stated that ‘‘all men 

and women are created equal’’, and called for the extension of basic civil rights to women, including the rights 

to hold property and to vote; 

Whereas Lucretia Mott, with Elizabeth Cady Stanton, founded the organized women’s rights movement in the United 

States; 

Whereas, in 1857, Lucretia Mott and her family moved to a 

farm called Roadside in Cheltenham, Pennsylvania, which 

became a station in the Underground Railroad for fugitive slaves to stop at before continuing their journeys up 

North; 

Whereas, in 1876, Mott represented the National Woman 

Suffrage Association and called for the impeachment of 

United States leaders due to taxation without representation; and 

Whereas, on November 11, 1880, Lucretia Mott passed away 

at 87 years of age: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) honors the life of Lucretia Mott and her 

3 achievements as a suffragette and abolitionist; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1215 IH 

1 (2) honors and, on behalf of the United States, 

2 expresses deep appreciation for the outstanding and 

3 important service of Lucretia Mott to her country. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
         ECOS Group, Inc.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                      119,113
<SECURITIES>                                140,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               777,176
<ALLOWANCES>                                324,711
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            1,221,614
<PP&E>                                      331,871
<DEPRECIATION>                              819,023
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              2,513,465
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       1,745,154
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 1,000,000
<COMMON>                                    22,156,493
<OTHER-SE>                                  (253,672)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                0
<SALES>                                     1,193,070
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            1,193,070
<CGS>                                       712,912
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               1,904,342
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            86,419
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          28,172
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (825,863)
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (825,863)
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                (825,863)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                               (0.02)
        


</TABLE>
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19A2382. CHRISTOPHER M. HUNT, SR. v. DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST

COMPANY.

This case began as a dispossessory proceeding in magistrate court. Following

an adverse ruling, defendant Christopher M. Hunt, Sr. appealed to the superior court. 

The superior court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, Deutsche Bank Trust Company, and

Hunt appeals. The plaintiff has filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that Hunt was

required to file a discretionary application in order to appeal. 

Appeals from superior court decisions reviewing lower court decisions by

certiorari or de novo proceedings must be initiated by filing an application for

discretionary appeal. OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1), (b); Bullock v. Sand, 260 Ga. App. 874,

875 (581 SE2d 333) (2003). “Compliance with the discretionary appeals procedure

is jurisdictional.” Smoak v. Dept. of Human Resources, 221 Ga. App. 257, 257 (471

SE2d 60) (1996). Hunt’s failure to file an application for discretionary review

deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal.Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion to dismiss

is hereby GRANTED, and this appeal is DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

August 06, 2019

08/06/2019