• 

• 

• 

South Coast 

Air Quality Management District tlfifmJ 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91 765-41 78 

__ ___ (909) 396-2000 • www.aqmd.gov 

BOARD MEETING DATE: June 6, 2014 AGENDA NO. 31 

PROPOSAL: 

SYNOPSIS: 

COMMITTEE: 

Adopt the 2016 AQMP Reasonably Available Control Technology 

Demonstration 

As a component of the 20 16 AQMP, SCAQMD is required to 

submit a Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) 

Demonstration to U.S. EPA by July 20, 2014. The RACT analysis 

provides a comprehensive assessment of the adequacy and 

comparative levels of emissions controls achieved in practice 

throughout the nation. The current analysis demonstrates that 

SCAQMD current rules largely meet U.S. EPA's criteria for RACT 

acceptability and inclusion in the SIP. It also identifies a few areas 

for further evaluation as part of the 2016 AQMP control measure 

development. This action is to approve the RACT Demonstration 

and direct staff to forward to CARB for approval and submission to 

U.S. EPA for inclusion in the SIP. 

Stationary Source, May 16, 2014, Reviewed 

RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: 

1. Approve the attached Resolution certifying that the SCAQMD's current air pollution 

rules and regulations fulfill the 8-hour ozone Reasonably Available Control 

Technology requirements, and adopting the RACT SIP revision; and 

2. Direct staff to forward the updated analysis - 2016 AQMP Reasonably Available 

Control Technology Demonstration to CARB for review and submission to the U.S. 

EPA. 

APPROVED 

by the 

South Coast Air Quality 

Management District Board { 

Date: • ~ 

&-{, -1..; ~:yutf:JA:. ~ Clerk of the Board 

EC:PF:JC:GO: KC 

Background 

Barry R. Wallerstein, D.Env. 

Executive Officer 

The South Coast Air Basin (Basin) is classified as "extreme" and the Coachella Valley 

located in Riverside County is classified as "severe-15" non-attainment areas with 

('/ea11i11g the air that Jt e breathe ... 
respect to the 2008 8-hour Ozone National Ambient.Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) . 

The Clean Air Actrequires that areas classified as moderate nonattainment or higher 

must develop and submit a demonstration that their current air pollution rules fulfill the 

8-hour ozone Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) Demonstration. The 

RACT analysis provides a comparison of the SCAQMD rules and regulations governing 

emissions to those established by the U.S. EPA guidance and representative agencies 

within California.and elsewhere throughout the United States. The purpose of the 

RACT analysis is to review, and where applicable, update an agency's toolkit to 

advance emissions controls to meet the current state of the science. The RACT State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) must be submitted by CARB to U.S. EPA by July 20, 2014. 

RACT analyses were incorporated as components of the 2007 and 2012 Air Quality 

Management Plan (AQMP) Reasonably.AvailableControl Measures (RACM)/RACT 

analyses submitted to the U.S. EPA for inclusion in the California SIP. The 2007 

analysis was primarily conducted to identify and select control measures to reduce 

ozone precursor NOx and VOC emissions; while the 2012 analysis focused on 

precursors of PM2.5. Staff studied more than 100 rules and regulations, and 100 control 

measures developed in the 2007-2012 timeframe by other nonattainment air districts in 

the, nation. The analyses concluded that the SCAQMD's rules and regulations were in 

general equivalent to, or more stringent than other districts' rules and regulations and 

their proposed control measures in their respective SIPs. 

Proposal 

The attached 2016 AQMP RACT Demonstration provides a comprehensive assessment 

of .the current SCAQMD rules 'and regulations .. In conducting the review, staff worked 

closely with the U.S. EPA adhering. to the provided criteria and guidance. Since the 

2012 AQMP submittal, the U.S. EPA has issued no new Control Technique Guidelines 

(CTG) for VOC sources and Alternative Control Techniques (ACT) documeqts for 

VOC and NOx sources. Regardless, the 2016 AQMP RACT analysis evaluated more 

than 30 rules recently developed and I or amended by other ozone nonattainment air 

districts from September 2012 to March 2014. The air districts in California included 

the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD), San Joaquin Air Pollution 

Control District (SN APCD), Sacramento Metro Air Quality Management District 

(SMAQMD), Mojave/Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District 

(MDAQMD/ AV AQMD), and Ventura County Air Pollution .Control District 

(VCAPCD) and state agencies for ozone.impacted.Je:Xf!.S, Milryiand and Delaware. - . ' 

The analysis indicates that SCAQMD rules and regulatio_n closely matched those of the 

other agencies, and only eight SCAQMD rules co:veriil'g:six 'source areas requife further 

evaluation: 

• Fugitive VOC emissions monitoring protocols between the BAAQMD and the 

SCAQMD gasoline bulk terminal and cargo tank operations need to be evaluated 

-2-

• 

• 

• 
• 

• 

to detennine whether the provisions of seAQMD Rule 462 apply to 

BAAQMD's Section 8-Rule 33 ... 

• Rule 71.5 of veAPeD regulates voe emissions from glycol dehydrators in 

natural gas dehydration needs to be evaluated to detennine if existing Rule 

1148.1 and Rule 1173 already cover these emissions. 

• Flare· emissions from sources other than refineries, sulfur recovery plants, 

hydrogen production plants need to b~ evaluated for potential controls, since 

SN APeD Rule 4311 regulates these flares emitting greater than 10 tpy of VOC 

orNOx. 

• AVAQMD Rule 1130 ancj companion SeAQMD Rule 1130 require further 

evaluation for voe content limit offlexographic specialty inkfor flexible 

package printing although inventory records ·indicate that the Basin emission 

reduction potential for this category to be de minimis based on the number of 

affected facilities. 

• BAAQMD rule (Reg: 9, Rule 13) NOx emission rate limits for cement kih1s will 

be evaluated to compare the impacts of alternate averaging periods and emissions 

limits with SeAQMD Rule 2002 • 

• SN APeD Rule 4570 applies to large confined animal facilities while using a 

lower applicability threshold fordairy and poultry facilities. It also specifies 

livestock feeding time restrictions based on local a feeding practice (wet feed) 

which might not apply to SeAQMD Rule 223 employed in the Basin where ciry 

feed is μsed._More detailed evaluation will be conductedto detennine the 

applicability of such feeding time restriction on District's sources, and the 

extension of rule applicability to certain livestock categories using a lower size 

threshold. 

Overall, for the 2016 AQMP RAeT Demonstration, SeAQMD.makes the following 

findings: 

1. SeAQMD's current.11.1les meet U.S. EPA's criteria for RAeT acceptability and 

inclusion in the SIP. 

2. seAQMD commits to further evaluate the six categories identified above for 

·potential emissio.n reductions as part of the 2016 AQ~ control measure 

development. 

-3-
-: ,, ., -- --,:- ·- 

 .. .. > . 

, .. 

,·P:il_!!J1f,'gr~t~~l .. fi~ • - .·/i1

:_• .--r' .. :·' o~ ~-'.'"t •' ~~·- O •' ~ ~·.- )~-~ ·.~ ' -, - U ---· .'::_·!--~ ' "> '- ~f .~·I r. ". -- -

0 

'• 

. A 3m9_ay;'fi§t!.c~;~~~iftitl2_!!~1!~9J~fo/!5 !i2llling1;~ iWJ~!icm~~g :Qn·th~i~OT S!P 

.:subrnifW'1' 'Q~~;p111Jli_cc9riμn~,rit·w~~ .. r~ceii'e4iii~ifajfiiPg,.foJ~e:reduction:ofmet»ane 

'ai;t<l, n~Iate.ct\gasesj·emliJjatiI1gi'fr9fu.loil ,119~. g~s,\Jf i.i:ts .· ·tJi'e';r~qpe~tfo1se.ektsuc~ errrission 

teductionsdiia)'oe· suited Jot a.filttrre control ;ffieasure';ilrvestigation, since'. a' RACT filiai)i~is ]§,re_s_tii9tecl 6iiiylt()·~d.9-P~~!!~~e§:,_@d:~g1\'I~_tj~i:ls;" · · · . ~ ~ _., :: 

4 ,,· 

... \; 

,....;,, ::'• I~•', •' >·" 1,: 

. ' 

., 

. ' 

. ' ·-· ~ .. :·.·' , . 

•' 

. ' '• . 

. ' 

.· .. ' 

·. . . 

.. , .. ·. 

' ' 

. :_;. 

" 

J '---·· __ :. _____ ,J,.~-~--~ r_ _:_ - - "~ - -

. - . ,. ,.J ·, . .~ f r . .,_ 

._._ 

·. f~. 

f·· 

,, 

"., 

••• 

• 
ATTACHMENT A 

RESOLUTION NO. 14-14 

A Resolution of the South Coast Air Quality Management District 

(SCQAMD) Board certifying that the SCAQMD's current air pollution rules and 

regulations.fulfill the 8-hour ozone Reasonably Available Control Technology 

(RACT) requirements, and adopting the RACT SIP revision. 

A Resolution of the SCAQMD Board certifying the Notice of 

Exemption for the 2016 AQMP Reasonably Available Control Technology 

Demonstration. 

A Resolution directing staff to forward the 2016 AQMP Reasonably 

Available Control Technology Demonstration to the California Air Resources 

Board (CARD) for review and submission to the United States Environmental 

ProtectionAgency (U.S. EPA). 

WHEREAS, Federal Register Volume 78, Page 34178, June 6, 2013, 

requires the State (or essentially local air districts) to submit a RACT SIP analysis 

within 24 months after the effective date of designation; and 

WHEREAS, the U.S. EPA has developed guidance and a list of Control 

Technique Guidelines (CTG) and Alternative Control Techniques (ACT) to aid local air 

districts in developing the RACT SIP Submittal in a consistent and effective manner; 

and 

WHEREAS, based on the Clean Air Act (CAA) §172 (c)(l) and 182, and 

the California Health and Safety Code (H& SC)§§ 40460(a), 40913, and 40440(a), the 

SCAQMD is required to adopt an Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP), rules and 

regulations containing reasonably available control measures (RACM) and RACT for 

both oxides of nitrogen (NOx) and volatile organic compounds (VOC) in order to lead 

the Basin into attainment with the federal and state ozone National Ambient Air Quality 

Standards (NAAQS) as expeditiously as practicable; and · 

WHEREAS, for the majority of the stationary and area .source categories, 

the SCAQMD has been identified as having the most stringent air quality plan, rules 

andregulations in California; and 

WHEREAS, in order to approve a rule and regulation into the SIP, 

CARB and U.S. EPA have to consider ifthe rule and regulation meets, at a minimum, 

the "presumptive" RACT level. Therefore, any categories for which U.S. EPA has not 
published any additional CTG/ACT'afterthe approval date, and for which no more 

stringent rule has since peen adopted, should be considered as meeting RACT for the 8-

hour ozone NAAQS, In addition, the.SCAQMD routinely reviews its rules at least 

every three years forair quality management·update, most recently in 2012, and 

proposes rule amendments whenever any information comes to its attention that 

indicates .that a rule can be made more stringent. The fact that these two review 

processes have not revealed any potential for making these rules more stringent 

indicates that the existing rules satisfy currentRACT for the 8-hour ozone NAAQS; and 

WHEREAS, where a CTG/ ACT became available after the U.S. EPA 

rule approval date; SCAQMD staff evaluated the rule and determined if the level of 

control provided in the new CTG/ ACT was more stringentthan the adopte·d rule; and 

WHEREAS, where the regulation approved by U.S. EPA is amended 

after the approval date, SCAQMD staff evaluated the amendments to ensure that the 

amendment does not result in a relaxation of control; and 

WHEREAS, substantiated by the analyses above, staff concluded that all 

CTG sources are subject to rules in Regulations IV, IX, X, XI, XIII, and/or XX which 

meet RACT requirements; and 

WHEREAS, substantiated by the analyses above; SCAQMD staff 

concluded that all major·non-CTG sources in the Basin are subject to rules in 

Regulations IV, XI, XIII, ,and/or XX that meet RACT requirements; and 

WHEREAS, since there·are currently no Regulation XI source-specific 

rules for agricultural pesticide applications, no RACT determination can be made, 

However, agricultural pestieide applicatfon is regulated by the State Department of 

Pestidde Regulation, and is not un:der the control ofthe SCAQMD; and 

WHEREAS, 'Title V facilities in the Basin-which have federal 

enforceable permits with dearly identified SIPcapptoved rules, all of which have been 

demonstrated to meet RACJ,-as discussed above; and 

WHEREAS, the SCAQMD Governing Board finds and determines that 

the SCAQMD 8cHour Ozone RACT SIP determination and submittal is considered a " 

project" pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA);·however, 

SCAQMD,staffreviewed the.proposed project and determined with.certainty thai the 

proposed project is exemprfrom the requirements of CEQA pursuant to CEQA 

Guidelines §1506l(b)(3); and 

-2-
WHEREAS, the Board has held a public hearing in accordance with all 

provisions of law; 

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, thatthe SCAQMD Board 

certifies that the SCAQMD's current air pollution rules and regulations fulfill the 8-hour 

ozone Reasonably Available Control Technology requirements. 

BE ITFURTHER RESOLVED, that the South Coast Air Quality 

Management District Governing Board does hereby certify the Notice of Exemption for 

the proposed project, is completed in compliance with CEQA Guidelines § l 5002(k)(l) -

Three Step Process and §15061(b)(3)- Review for Exemption (General Rule 

Exemption). This information was presented to the Governing Board, whose members 

reviewed, considered, and approved the information therein prior to acting on the 

proposed project. 

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that SCAQMD commits to further 

evaluate the six source categories identified in the RACT demonstration for potential 

emission reductions as part of the 2016 AQMP control measure development. 

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, thatthe SCAQMD Governing Board 

requests that the 2016 AQMP Reasonably Available Control Technology 

Demonstration be submitted into the State Implementation Plan. 

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Executive Officeris hereby 

directed to forward a copy of this Resolution and the 2016 AQMP Reasonably 

Available Control Technology Demonstration to the California Air Resources Board for 

approval and subsequent submittal to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for 

inclusion into the State Implementation Plan. 

A YES: Antonovich, B. Benoit, J. Benoit, Burke, Buscaino, Cacciotti, Gonzales, 

Lyou, Mitchell, Nelson, Parker, Pulido, and Yates. 

NOES: None. 

ABSENT: None. 

DATE: ,Twv-: i J Z/; I i ~~"{Yb)~j) 

Saundra McDaniel, Clerk of the Board 

-3-
• 

•• 

ATIACHMENT B 

SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT 

2016 AQMP Reasonably Available Control Technology(RACT)Demonstration 

May 22, 2014 

Deputy Executive Officer 

Planning, Rule Development, and Area :sources 

Elaine Chang, DrPH 

AssistantDeputy Executive Officer 

Planning; Rule Development, and Area.Sources 

Philip M. Fine, Ph.D. 

Planning and Rules Manager 

Planning, Rule Development, and Area Sources 

Joseph C. Cassmassi 

Authors: 

Reviewed by: 

Kalam Cheung, Ph: D. - Air Quality Specialist 

Gary Quinn, P.E. - Program Supervisor 

Barbara Baird - Chief DeputY Counsel 
· .. -.·. 

... . ~.'._' . l: ' ' 

'~- ' ...... 

.. . , ~LIAM1A:::BURi(E;.Eci:o,, -

' !S~<:r '?ftheh\ss~n1b1y Appointee: 

._.:' _; __ ,. __ ~·-~:~~-~·-~-:~: .. ·:~~~~;_2;=~ ·, l,_'~··'• ~· i .\ ~""- . :oENNIS¥A:PES . . - . 

; , Mayo~ :·pfuPd\ ~,' ' . - _ _ Citi~s-.of,S:iij.'Benw-illl)o' County ... 

MEMBERS·• · • - ,_ . . \ 

MICHAE1"':1'> .. ANT0N6Vi.eli " 

:supen;i.S'or; Fifth•Di!ifriCi - ' C(Jl!11iy, 3j, - k<:J~; . . 

~gel~ ' -

, BENiBEN©fu:· .- ·• - - . M:a:~9-.'-;i'rii :fim,,wiiai>nilir: .ciiiesiofRiver~ide county · 

JOIIN•J. BEN~IT, 

. srrpi:~s6f;f6urtlif>istrlbt -- Couiit5;· Of Ri~side 

\ 

,, 

. MICHAEL-A. CAC€I0il'T _ 

Councilmember; Sorilli>Pasadena. . . -

C:lrt~;of_l:<isi&i!ie1e5~Gbl!n'iyl'ga,siel'l!'BegioJ1 " 

JOSIE 60NZAI:lES 

· su~oi;;I'iftli'Disfrier. . ~· .. ·~j, ,• ' -.. ' 

Col!nlY oN~l!ll B~rmu:dinc;> 

•-'~---'- --·· ~- ,..·~·- •, 

... 

JOSEi>i-IOK:.L -Yoff.·Pb.1.D: o<iveinor~~:Aifptili!~.:·.-··· ·-·-

JUDITHMITCHELe 

l\{ay9r, R<Jlfu!.g:•J:!i!!(E§_i~.Les _-_ . titie8 of[.os.l\lfgeles CcniI1ty/\veste.hi-Regi!JI1 . r·-

SHAwN NELS@N· ·- .. 

s\ii)ervisiif:,Fouftli'E>isfriet: 

copij!y '.<_i:t]~Qn1nge · · -• - - ' ' ' ~- . 

' ' 

.. ·l: - " 

-. ~ 

... 

) - -· 

. 

.. . ; . 

' . 

- ;;. 

' 

... ~ 

• 

• 

.· 
I,,..,_._ -:--·1·-~;;/,_---,---;r"'.:-~1:¢"''f~-~------

•f- '".' '· ·. 

_.., .It 

• ·- r-1. 

' .,. 

.- ... ., .•, .. ),;;·~ · -~ .rr--. ·· ~ ·· 

-· . ···,, 

.•, 

-~ . ;::-. --.,_:·~'.. -·" - .'f1,'.>-:_..~· - , • • . ~ • J J .. 

. ~;· .. / :,- tf~Ft~~~E$ .. '.~,: ··;···:::-·•;• '·.-;:·"'::'.'':~,.:. ··;·:· .. :. '·'·: '·'•,, ... ·.'-.'·· .. '""'··",. ·'', ...... : ...... : : ... ··: .... : ........ R.~'.t' 

.;- . 

";/ 

'I ' ~ ·• 

.- ..• . -· .. ·-- ".'"':: ·-··;" -

... 

" 

.• 

,• 

I' ., . 

. 1 

-,,.; :,\ °).··- t ·_ ...... ! ':'._"-__.:_ 

-! 

' .. _
Reasonably Available ControlTechnology Demonstration 

INTRODUCTION 

The South Coast Air Basin (Basin) is .. classified as "extreme7' and the Coachella Valley 

located Jn Riverside County is classified as "severe-15" non-attainmentareas with respect 

to the 2008 8-hour Ozone National Ambient Air .Quality Staridards.(NAAQS). The Clean 

Air Act reqt1ires thatcareas classified as moderate nonattainh)ent or higher must develop 

and submit a demonstration that their. current air pollution rules fulfill the .s~hour ozone 

Reasonably·Available Control Technology (RACT) Demonstration. TheRACT analysis 

provides a comparison of the SCAQMD rules and regulations governing· emissions to 

those established by·the tJ.S .. EPA guidance and represent,ative agencies within California 

and elsewhere throughout the US. The purpose of the RACT analysis is to review and 

where·applicable update an agency's toolkit to.advance emissions controls to meet the 

currencstate ofthe science, The RACT State Implementation Plan (SIP) must be. 

submitted by CARB to the U.S: EPAby July 20, 2014. 

REGULATORY HISTORY 

RACT analyses wete incorporated as components of the 2007 ang.2012,Air Quality 

Management Plan (AQMP) Reasonably Available Control Measures (RACM)IRACT 

Demonstrations submitted to the U.S. EPA for inclusion of the California"SIP. The2007 

demonstration was'a comprehensive.analysis cofiducted to identify and select control 

measures to reduce ozone and particiHate precursor NOx, VOC, SOx and particulate 

• 

emissions (to meet'the s~hour ozone and annual PM2.5 standards). The 2012 analysis • 

focused primarily on precursors of PM2.5 including NOx, VOC and SOx (to attain the 

24-hour average PM2.5 standard1. Staff studied more than TOO rules andTegulations, and 

100 control measures developed.in. the 20Q7c2012 timefrartte'by other nbnattaifiment air 

districts in the nation, The demol].strations concluded that the SCAQMD's rules and 

regulations were in generalequivalent to, or more stringent than other districts' rules and 

regulations (RACT) and their proposed.control measures in theirrespective SIPs 

(RACM). 

The 2007 and 2012 RACM/RACTdemonstrations documents are included ih the.2007 

AQMP (Table 3 of the 2007 AQMP "Appendix VI: Reasonably Available Control 

Measures (RACM) Demonstration") and the 2012.AQMP (Tables VI~3, VI-4 ancfVIc5 c:if 

the 2012.AQMP "Appendix vr: Reasonably Available Control Measures (RACM) 

Demonstration~') and they are ayailable frOrn theSCAQMD website at. the links below:. 

2007AQMP 

http://www.agmd.gov/home/library/clean-air-plans/air"gualitycmgt-plan/2007-air-gualitymanagement-plan 

2012AQMP 

http://www .. agmd.gov/hoine!library/clean~air.~plans/air"aualitycmgt-plan/final-2012-air- • 

guality"management-plan · · 

1 
• 

• 

Reasonably Available Control Technology [)emonstration 

RACT EVALUATION 

The 2016 AQMP RACTBemonstration analysis provides an update to the corresponding 

. analyses discussed above. In conducting the review, staff worked closely with the U.S. 

EPA·adhering to the provided criteria and guidance. Since the 2012 AQMP submittal, 

the U,S. EPA has not issued new Control Technique Guidelines (CTG) forVOC sources 

and Alternative Control Techniques (ACTs) documents for VOC and NOx sources. 

Regardless, the 2016 AQMP R:ACT analysis evaluated more than 30 rules recently 

developed and I ot amended by other ozone nonattainment air districts from September 

2012 to March 2014 (Table 1). The air districts in California included: 

• Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) 

• SanJoaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (SNAPCI)) 

• Sacramento Metro Air Quality Management District (SMAQMD) 

• Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District (MDAQMD) 

• Antelope Valley Air Quality Manageμient District (AV AQMD) 

• Ventura County Air Pollution Control District (VCAPCD) 

and state agencies for ozone impacted: 

• Texas 

• Maryland 

• Delaware 

The evaluation,indicates that BCAQMD rules and regulation closely matched those of the 

·other agencies, and only eight.SCAQMD rules covering six source categories were 

identified for further evaluation. Table 2 is formatted to compliment the comp;uison 

summaries presented in the 2007 and2012.AQMP RACM analyses. A brief description 

of the issues· requiring further evaluation follows. 

First, SCAQMD Rule 223 applies to large confined animal facilities while the companion 

SN APCD Rule 4570 has lower thresholds for regulation of dairy and poultry (chicken 

and duck) facilities .. Rule 4570 specifies mandatory measures, and ithas livestock 

feeding time restrictions based on a local feeding practice (wet feed) which is not 

employed in the Basin where dry feed is u.sed. The primary difference between the rules 

focuses on the limitation placed on feeding times where the wet feed practice is restricted 

to two hours duration due to the composition of the feed. SCAQMD Rule 223 has a 48-

hour time limit on the dry feedingapplication. More detailed evaluation will be 

conducted as part of the.2016 AQMP control measure development to determine the 

applicability of such feeding time restriction on District's sources, and the extension of 

rule applicability to•certain livestock categories using a lower size threshold . 

2 
Reasonably Available Control TechnologyDeinonstration 

Second, BAAQMD (Reg. 8, Rule'33) voe limit for gasoline bulk.terminal and cargo 

tank operations was foiindto be more restrictive than the companion SCAQMD Rule 

462. BAAQMD Rule 33 establishes arrernission iirnit.of0.04 lbs per 1000 gallons of 

organic.liquid loaded while the SCAQMD Rule462 has 0.081bs per 1000 gallons limit 

However;the compliance test protocol needs to be further compared to determine the 

applicability ·of the emissfons limit• to the District sources. 

Rule 71.5. of VOAPeD. regulates VOC emissions from glycol dehydrators in natural gas 

dehydration. voe emissions from glycol dehydration system need to be evaluated to 

determine if.eXisting SCAQMD Rule 1148.1 and Rule 1i73.ali'eady cover these 

ennss1ons. 

SeAQMD Rule 1130 regarding flexographic specialty ink for facilities emitting more 

than 10 tonsperyear (tpy) is more restrictive"than companion AVAPCD Rule l13b. For 

facilities that emit .Jess tha:ll IO tolls pet year and thll,t' use less than 2 gailon.s per day and 

less than I20 gallons per year, Antelope Vall~y Rule 1130 has <l· more res_trictive VOC 

content limit of flexographic specialty illk for flexible· package printing (383 gll) than 

SeAQMD Rule 1130 (460 g/l for metallic illk and 535 g/l for matte finish ink for no 

more than 125 gallons per year a:nd 2 gallons pet day)c The seAQMD inventory records 

indicate that the emission redμcti'on potential for this c.ategory to l:>e•de.111,inimis based on 

the number of affected facilities (0:006 tons per day (TPD) for all permitted flexographic 

printing operations in the District). Nevertheless, SeAQMD will analyze the viability of • 

creati'ilg a new sub-category. · 

S.(V APCD Rufo4311 regulates flares emitting greater than JO tpy of VOCorNOx 

regardless of,source•cat~gory with the exemption.of municipal solid waste landfills. 

SeAQMD Rules 1118 and 1'150.1 cover flare emissions (including NOx and Voe) from 

refineries, sulfurrecovecy plants, hydrogen. production plants, alld landfills. PQtential 

flare emis.sions;from other District somces need to be evaluated to determine the local 

applicability ofthe•SN APCD Rule 4311. 

Finally, NOx emission rate. limits. fof'cerllent kilns in the Basin are slightly highef (2. 73 

vs. 2.3 lbs/ton of clillker) when comparihgSCAQMD Be$t Available Retrofit Control 

Technology level in.Rule·2002with the BAAQMD Reg. 9, Rule 13. It should he noted 

that the SCAQMD·averaging time for the.NOx limit is one year using a continuous 

emission monitoring system while BAAQMD is 30 days. SeAQMD will assess the 

feasibllity of reducl.ng:NOx emissions from cement kilns .through· the Regional Clean Air 

Incentives Market program thatproposed .amendments are uilqeryvay. 

FUTURE EVALUATION 

While no 11ew CTG h_a~ been issued sll!ci; the .2012.AQMP submittal, Q.S, EPA staff has 

suggested that the SCAQMD look into the recent developments of warm mix.asphalt • 

(WMA) technologies. WMA allows the mixing and. placement of asphalt mix at 

3 
-R~aJ:i()!!<tb.Jy Ax!lila1'Je (<m!rolTecl_in<)logy Demonstration 

teiiip~r!trute al>0ut 35to 100°F lower than conventional hotmix asphalt (HMA),resultirtg 

jnaiecl\Jction offueLconsumption, as well as reduced emissions from.the fiianiifactiliii:ig 

plarttand.arthe location where the asphaltis iaid. In a white pap¢r 4eveloped by the 

,scA:~Mb·in.2008, staff ccmclUciedthatJower"en_ergy wann miJ<.asphalnechnologies 

w~r~1priaj~iJigri11reQ.u_cing energy·use and reduction in .ai!·emissions; despi

1

te the fact . 

·that)IDX!and sti:uctunil desl.'gn, material processing requirements, construction procedures; 

.ano qualicy·.control:specifications were not yet finalized to .date.· · 

~Ii~ l:Jeenoajcreasingly use_d.i)l the United States, Caltranspromotes the.use of 

WMA because'-of itsrrruiny;imp~ovements over HMA. wMA suppliers.reported 19"50% 

. voes reduction artd;60l~O% NGh reduction in plant emis~forts in Europe, alth6\lg.Q -

'increased'emissiOns ofVOCs.and co were observed in the United States. The University 

• 6f<;;@foriJii1;fa".~Ili.eritRe~efil'~h Ce)lier measu~ed VOCs and se~-~olatile organic ' 

c;omp0μn(ls ierr,llssionof'·WMA aqd HMA at the pavementsurface during:construction. 

Resulfs showe(tthat;dependirtg on the mix type and.the temperature inside the chamtiet; 

1\CDC emission flux of WMA. could be higher or lower.than H~. Based on c;urrerit 

'fnfqfi}1~~1QJh tQe•~miss_ion,repuction of WMA technology is highly uncertain. Ther~fore, -

s~f;sμggests;fui1her evaluation of the emission reduction and cost-effectiveness'for 

WMA technology as part of the 2016 control measure development. ' 

. C0NQL:USJON 

Overall, forthe 2016 AQMJ> RACT Demonstration, SCAQMb makes the following 

.finding~: 

l. S<::'A:QMD's C:urr.ent rules, in large part; meet the U.S. EPA's criteria for RACT 

accepiiibility andindusion in:,the SIP. 

· _ 2'. SCAQMD cominits fo f_liftljer,eyaluate the six categories identified above for 

potential.emission reductions as part of the 2016 AQMPcontrol.development. 

4 
' I 

I 

I 

Reasoriabl\i Available ControlTechriologyJ?emoristratiori 

Table i 

.Rul~sEvaluated·r'&t~;\.CTI>emonstra(ion 

san. r oaquiil v auey.Aii,Pollutfori control ' 

_'..", Dis'trici ___ , ___ - ~ 

, Rufo•Nun\ber/Title . . . , , 

Rule)4308f(Boilers, Steaiii,Qelfefatiks;,1al!i:li~r~essi.H~tefs); R.lile·t!'.:H! 

(F,fares); ,Riile14570•(Corifiried! A.riifuaJ;Fai:ilities);'RUle>4605_~Aefcispace 

. Asse!!itiif1!!rri:l~~o111poi;i~11tJ!:(J~@E); ~!!Ii 4_/i&J'~(G.11~!;\!i!'e'.~~~~',iii.!'2 . Motor; Veliicle)~ Rule ~622 .(Oasoline'Transfer.1ih~o·, Stiitionacy·':1ltorage; 

! I Containers); !Rule 4702 '(Iritemal oGombustion Ehgihes); and~Rufo;96l0 : I <siP;Ci@id~ii-;'Emfss16[Raitii:ti6~i:' .... ' . • . . . 

:Nent\lfa,,C()uJl\y16ir Pollutio_n,C.ont:r,01'E>i*!ct i i fu!Ie' S.1:!!~#~c'G~~.CJ.l!!'!ds);i:E'.!!!(1?&? ,S9lyc;<;>l~,D~hy_clra!ors); 1Rule 

, 7431.1;1(1.i'11:ge ~l!ter(H~tersj@Q §@!I J:Joil~r~kRule~Z4'l3., (J\~,Q~Pl!f.!l 

'AssembJ):,anct:Coll)poneiihManufactlliiilgJ'; Riile174:~5,'l ;(Boilers,. ~ream 

, G.~!l~r:iJor!t ~c!,f~g<:!'.[s,f,!~!.!1f~~; ·l{IJ!~J(!2 <§@P!&c. t\ri,S~; R111e,'?41~P. ... · (;t\dlfe5ives 'hlio, •Searrults); Rule, '74.24 (M_:iririe,_1§oatings); and :KuJ(<' 

~ ~~- _ .• l74'.:31(MeralworKing.FJuiCis_and:0irechconfact·Ll1brii::arits);·" _ 

13aY,·Afea Airi~ualit};_~~gemeiit DiStri~F' , ; ~eg. 2~ Riile A ~Eliiissfoil~ ~ailki\[g); ~~; 3, :(Fees} R~g: ;s, ·(ope,;r , (!!~g);;;R~g,, g,_1E;uJ.t; ~1~Mt<!~l.'.Resycling1and'. Shreclcfui.g: Opt;f'.ltions)} 

· ' !'Reg. i8; RUie; :33J (Qasiilih(l· Bullc. Tetiniil!tls, :~41 9A~iilih~ J:?!iliyery 

~Sacn1lnentol\1e!ro:AIT.Quality,MaI1J!.gelnent 

, , District . · 

I l . AJifoJOpe Valley Air Quiility:Maiiagemeiiti 

1 

lyeliicies); R:_eg, 9("Ru_l~ •10 (Boil~rs_:, Steam l?eil,ef~tO,rS:, ana; .ffocess' , _ 

, ,H~ters· 'in' lI!t:tf.o!¢Kri\: B,¢t!!l~t)s ); Jl!)g; ·. 2> _Ku]C!'C!B (J?or•)J!!1<! '~ll!!C~t! · _, ;Miiiiiifiicthlifiii); anmReiL12;JRiifo 13\<FoundfY,illfdrEoririiiiiZOiJei'ations) · , 

• rRiile· 10} '~Altefillltive; GQWPJi1\1lce); Rii!~;,:.7Q5 {~ol.!J!l1~-tritx Jl~~~!! ·. ~:P1iofitY, '1Res·erve Bfillk)JJ :RJlie1 301 ~eiillif ;Fee~); lfjid :Rufo, ·3Q6. tAH , c'FoxicsrFees)1'-- __ _ , . _ 

,

1 

District• . .· . ·.· .·. . . , · : , Texas Commission on Envifoririientitl @ality I [.R,iiJe.'101b' ~Fil~~re to; Attaifr Fee); Rule~JQlh':(Erriissfo~ :E\;iiitki1lg; and 

1 ' . , i;I~!l~~;;'RJ!J~_ IQ6,~ C1-g~7!l!!,l~'~\I Pi,1V~ll)e_!11);,:,Rule 1()61

0 ~9il:~d Gas);; . . cRule lllbl(Outdoor Burnmg); Rμl!l)'.l:lc ;(Nat1Qrtal .Enns.s1on SJand_ar_~: 

I ';for Hazardous Air Polllitiilits); RUle1 a'l4b (Motor Vehicle: rAiiti, 

~ - ! 

1- _.,.. __ -_ •• _"'- __ -- ,-, - -·.- -~-- -""- - '.-'·•_ --- • - ' ~-.·-'··"- - - _- _--_--.-· 

ltaillpe1i!!gk Bil.1~1 l'.14,!: {:\(ehicleJii~t>-~ti~!j .@ll~_M,ajpte113n~¢); J{l!lfi ;lf S!l 

-' · f,{sii'i'face~coa:tin'1fProcesses);.-aiiCl'Ruie N7d'(MmoNSourcesl - ' ' l~~~~~~,,.,,,,~~~~~=-"~""",-,=~l'-'-~="'~~~.,,,..~-,-'-"'-"""'--,,-'~~~~~,-'--~.,-,~-"7-,,,.-~~~~ 

.· ·, E>efawar!lDepaithiertt' cif1NaflJra[Res9ufces 1 \geg?ll'•rns~ Secti.Qiii6'.Qf (Cliroml\l rri'J~:I~!!~P1-~\i!lg!aJ1d An@i.?'fu!l I~);• 

. '~and';EnvrronffienLCorifrol · . ,_ ' '~geg. lB8,1'Sedioii 10;0 (Rfatilig aridlRoiis!iiilg"OperatioiiS).;,ano :Reg. ~~··"---·-,_- __ ··_ ----··--,·-- - - .. -"" - -«r- .~ - ,- - --- ---•, ·:-· .. ;: 1· H3s,·section· 1•7:0•(Preoared FeedsdManufacturiflg:;Facilities) _ ' : 

-- 5!. " 
• • • 

Rea8onably Available Control Technology Demonstration 

Table.2· 

Evaluation of SCAQMD Rules and Regulations 

RULE TYPE RULE TITLE CURRENT REQUIREMENTS OTHER DISTRICTS' 2012-2014 RULES EVALUATION (2016 AQMP RACT) 

223 voe Emission Rule 223 applies to large'coilfiried San Joaqu_in Villley Rute'4~?0 (Amend_ed 'SOuthelil Cal_i_fOiliia dairy industries generally 

Reduction Permits animal fa~ilities {CAF). It iequ_ires_ IOfll/10) ~g\i)~teS.Jilrge,CAF whil_e us_i_ng a use _dry _lo(daiJ:ies. in comparison-With ~~e 

for Large oWn_eJ'.sloperati~ns_ to ob_ia.in a permit lower applicability threshold for ~iry (500 COnlJ!lOD,~ctice of feeding wet __ corn.silage in 

Confined Anima1 describing the control measures the n:ii_lking cows) and p,oul_try (400,000 for both lhe Central Vaitey .. The ~ore.stringen1.feeding 

Facilities (acili_ty c~ooses to implement-from a chicken and di.Jck) facilities, and: it has more reqt.iirement;in.Rule 4570 may not be 

(Adopted" 612106) list of mitigation- measure stri~gent requirements iit the following areas: apjlliCable·at SCAQMD: 

requir~rnents. Admiiri~lrative • Tirilefl'.ame·for feedif!g to~I mixed rations MOTe ci.etiiiled eval'uation.will.be conducted as 

require!"llents·such as record,keeping i.n the.dairy.feed.menu is 2 hours p-<ll1.ofthe-7616~~QM~'contfoi ~sure 

and noticing are also needed. •Specify· both mandatory and option.iii development to determine.the applicabilily of 

' miti~ion_ measure sui:h,feeding-time reStriction on Districc's 

Sources, ilnd the extension of the-rule 

appliciibiliCy'tO daines a~d.certilin POultry 

facilities using a lower size threshold. 

SCAQMD.staff wil1'continue to reach out and 

solicit input from potentially impacted 

st.a,keholders and assess the feasibility ~f 

reducini! emissiOns in future rule makina. 

462 voe Org~ic LiQuid Limit in,Rule 462 is·0.08 lbs per Bay Area, Regulation 8, Rule 33 (Amended SCAQMD staff will compare compliance test 

Loading 1000 gallons of liqu~d loaded for 4/15/09) has a limit of0.04 lbs per. 1000 protocols to determine applicabilitfto our 

(Amended Class.A facility loading·of20,000 gallons of liquid loaded and requires emis_sion sources: SCAQfylD staff will. 

5/14/99) gallons or more. Thi_s·limit is not stringent.monitoring requirements. continue to_assess the feasibility ofred~~ing 

applicable to sma!I facilities (Class B the voe limits as part of the 2016 AQMP 

and CJ. control measure develooment. 

1118 NOx, Control of • Minimize flare erriissions & San Joaquin Valley Rule 4311 (Amended SCAQMD Rule 1150._1 COvfr.s flare erilissionS 

1150.I voe Emissioi:is from ~quire smokeless.operations 6/18/09) has VOC/NOx limits for.ground- from active landfills, ~d SCAQMD R·ule 11 is 

Refinery Flares • Specify S02 gradua11y decreasing level enclosed flares; S02 Targets ( 1.50. also applies !o:hydrogen pr()(,fuction and sulfur 

(Amended performance target to" less th~n 0.5 ton!W'million barrels of crude by 2011, and recovery facilities. ft.should be noted that the 

I i/4/05) ~ons per million.baITels of crude' by 0.5 tons/million barrels ·by 2017); Flare SJVAPCD Rule.,4311 exempts emergency'. Use 

2012. Minimiza_tioil P\an for,refinery flares _IJlo.re of flares. SCAQMD:Staff.will evaluate flare 

• If.the performance target is 'than. 5 mmbtu/hr; and operntional emissiOns from sources other than.refineries, 

e~ce~e~. t_he Oj>erator mu st I) pay reqLiirements for all flares that have hydrogen production, sulfur recovery facilities 

rriiiiga~ion fee; or.2)· submi_t a Flare potential to emit more than I 0 tons/yr voe and.laiidfills for potential controls. 

Mi_tigation Plan to.reduce and'more than 10 tons/yr of NOx. 

emissions 

• Require'Cau~e Am.ilysis for event 

ex~,e&ii1'g l()(J l,bs·,voc, 500 lbs of 

S02, l?_r-500,000.scfm of Vent gas, 

excluding planned shutdown, 

startup and turnarounds 

• Require 160 ppm\'.~H S, 3'houi 

average by Jllf7Q99, and_ ~o limits 

for··NOx, VOC,-PM-and CO. 

6 
Reasonably Av~ilable·•C:ontiolTechnolOgy Deinollstration 

.RULE! 'TYPE~ I 

H-1301 

·1148:1 

}i73 

Voe 

' 

RULE TITLE· 

.Gna)>hicrAits ""' . 

!.(Ame,nded 5/2Jl4) 

·oiJ:aJfd_aas 

"PrndUCtiOO-:We1_1s 

(Adofo~ii:Ji5i(/4> 

Table :Z . Evaluation ofSGAQN1D Rules and'l~.egulations•(c9ntin,u~c1). 

··CURRENTREQUIREMENTS'_ 

RUie] l l30 )illows JOr, higher :VOC 

1cOnteiit For-·maite'(5Js,gn)·and, :. · nietii11 iC' flCXO~j)hiC: ilikS '( 460: g/J)_' 

1 

,-~ct®~iP,~~I~~~tiS~~!t!9f : facilitie_s_thafe_niit.Ie_ss _tha_n\1_0_.~ons 

;: pe!!Yefil\anlfihat u~e-JC:ss _than:~{ 

· gai1on·s_per:c1.iiy.and ·Jess than 125 

, ~!if~S~ P~_(Y~-:~[:_!!l~~sJt~~~-fE ~~· 

i1 1 '!-~'~ _t_M_~:'t:~~~~~~S'~%:-- : 1,.e·mission_s:from·wellheads;,Well 

0THERDISTRICTS'!2012-2014·RULES. EVALUATION.(2016AQMP.RACT) 

For·faCilities~that eri:tit Jess· than 1 I O,tons:Rer: ~ ·:SCAQlv!D;g~!~-~~:U9J!<!~ .. ~-~p}i_!:Jl_~nc_lf_d ,_ 

year.and.that Use'iess tban·-2;.g.iilOm(per.'<iaY·: 'pursuant to,u~s. EPA'_CTO .. It.is._in·g~eral 

?fid•less·1h·an:.12o·ga11onS'Pef·.yeii.r.·cif tlfe1 -- !equi vaJent to.~or. more··smligenfthan~ltie; 

S'-"'--cifi&{ihk; Aliful --= i.Vii1Je' ~ 1RUie'J'130 --COID"" iiiiiOi:liUle 'ifr Ai"itei~-<EVWiiy ._ __ ._,~, ·--·-'"'~~-~~ ~~-""~Y .... ,·-.·~·~~,-~ \,"""" R,, .. , . ..,..-,_,__ .... ,.,.,,. ..... ---,,__ .... -·!J,=c.·. 

~!~-'?{~ Xt?.~Th!gh~.r~N'9,G,;fQ_!!tel)_!_ w~"-~· ,:§.~~pff2~&!~!li!i"l'.S~!.!!1!t~fuit!~-~~..t~~! ~­ _(5_35;·~) .iJnd ~etiilic,nex~graPhic (46<},gii):. ~tons,~1,y~,_aQd~h<!t .. ~~J~~~:~~~,_2Jgi!!!pn~S .. ii:Jks·us:eci:on·non~porous,sUl::istiates;'and}he ' 1 • P.l;r.day.iind:less than 120_-~lons_:p~,year 

.voe content'liffi.it:isJS3'gt1 1for ·metai'1ic· ., ,'(i25rgaifuns;per.yew--fur sCAQMD~ol~ 

ink'Tu<i, maite: fi iliSh~ iilk""f'a·y,1 iea on. neXi ble · '. riexOgljptiiCTSpeciattf ink~ :Aiiei0p·e'.,v w1ey, -~~k·age,print~g~-- ~·" ___ P · --- ---~--- ---· · -·- iRUie 1:J'30'rmr-;r-more-restticii~e'vbc-:conten1 

j~~~1f:t~~:~~~~;~s~r~1~-.. ,----~-- · 

RUIC 71·:5:or venturif COi.mtf (Adotned 

''.SCAQMD:Rulf~l,130 (46o.~:for.meta11iC irik; 

·.aE_dJ·~-~'i0 for-mane:lliifSh'ifik): . 

Ttie~SGAQMD:iiiVeiltOi'" ~recofdS'.indiCaiC~tha( _,···-~ ··- --·.-.-,,··"'"- ._ -~-·- ... -_,,.c:--_.Y;-.~,..-='";7~ ;--.s.~,..,--.,-_,. ,the .em1_ss1on~ re_dUctJ.on ~tenllal for. ~this_ 

1:-categoiy· tO:'k ·1-di".''.;,;fnimi-S:--:basecr:an, the 

·,numb"ef",'ofiaffCcteCi' faCUities,ibut; staff1wiff <COiitinue~_toin·ssess1the· _fiasibilit)'~/ofrreduci·ng 

ttK~···Y-9~c~!lJPIW:@TP?E.ilfl~~l~Q}~.ki\Q¥~ · coril?rot'imeasure Cleveloomeni., -

,,'.·c~_pW:S~ iin:d,·, ii~tr-~~-~-~~~~ gas_ ai ~ \'oil~ an Ct: gas_.pi"~ductioil: operatjons. 

-·This ru1e·reQuires'Ccincen'tratiOn···af. 

.l"?Jl3_(9,1i~R.-i91~: Y9£,~~~-~i-~liE:~~h.1 ! ~YC(l! q_~.~Y-d!'.1:tt¥S_"u_sed !R})~tu!!li,gl!S_ 

dCh'ydration:tliroUgh:: _ 

:.~ii~;;~~~~:;:~~ii.~rmf~ri~~l~trom 

jg!Y§P!;~~~Y.#r!~f~~-~,!§~8ti, :_ . ,Rules_.l l48!_l _(Oil'and'GasProqllction,,~eUS), 

(A)- Condenser'ivapor_disposal~'or 

,· k~#!Tufw~.(~%~~~?~t¥ I -:~good_J1lal1:Rgemen~ p~~ces-~or_.the 

fStorage·and iransfei-~of or~ic 

'(B)_ FlcireJifJCirieril:Or, cir -

·- ,,-(CXt~-~s_iO~.~~~@i_r~~-~~fef(J~(~j?litfOI~ gl yc_ol r_egenerator. venr VOC · emi ssiOns by 

ai·1e.st·9s%: 

· 1',.1l!Q~~~~71~fui~Si_~]S'pf,JlroCl,U~ed·,ga~ 

!f:.Sli~.pe_:s~!I~~)iff~.I.cfli~!!@~~y--

if (~)_{A· syS!).i:n h_andU.~g:~.'.for~-~~l. 

i saJe;·or.underground-iiljectiOn; or' 

,.(B)rA: deviCe,\Viih a:VQCTvapOc 

'.';;reffiovai,'effiCieilC)i','demonstfu1ed tO' .'· ·lle1aiieiSt'.9s-%\-b.._,~~e(hi·Or6..,._. ; ; .",__...- ___ .. ,.'" -~··--'·· .... Y ..,,., _g_·--'--·-·. Y ,1 

).de_m9ns~!i_n,g ~,Ql;i_tlet ~yoc 

,. concentiation-of-50 nnm. 

7 

I 

· anCi!i" · i«?j :. (teaks' ft.om •Peuoieum f 8.Ci'iiti~S): 

;s-CAQMD-:Staf(wiii-eviifi.iate,:voc··emissiOns 

, l!om:wr~-C!1~d-~~y~_or(SY:~-~=@.:_, _ 

• 
.,,, ~ ........ , 

... ~ . ,._; ,_ 

'· .;;;,· ~. 

:·; _ •• ::.._ 1, ·:' '., 

,,-

. ' -·~ 

<-

2002'• 

-TYPE- -RULETITLE; 

AJlocatiOO~; ror: 

'O~aes:of'. -- ,Nitrogen· .. 

and 'OXides (N6x) 

;'of.Sulfui"·· 

·tAmenCted: 

.1'1islio> 

•' 

---~--- •· ......... ~~-~~------ ..... -~.-:::....:;-.-;--... -, 

. '. "·-" 

~ 1~ 

-· 

~-,­

·--

'. 

- ,. -, . -,, , -- " -: ;_,if.·. 

.- •-.f ··:.. 

:- ' ....... j.;;_- --.f-~ ' 

• · ,., J'atiie·2 _ _ . 

Evaluation. of'$ct\QMDfili°lli~;iiria R.e@iations {c<:ifitiilued) - ., __ -~-~-.·----·-{ ---~ ·---=-~ ·---~·----:""··,~ - •o, .----- -·"·oc-·..,. .. _._-,_-__ ..., 

_I ,,C ,. . .-

CURRENT REQUIREMENTS._ 

The·curi'ent best available retrofit 

' 

f- • 

J.• ..i·, 

:_c:Qntroi-.tOCh.iOfOgy·'(liARCT)'iS''.fi3_ 

. ib~on~ of cJfnker. 

:BaY._.A.f¢;l;':RC_gl,ililti_o~·9,-_.1,l_ille·_1~:(Ad~p_tCd·~ , ~-~-A9~R,-~.1~~-:t~--~-c~-,~~~ri.(~!~-~-

:9/Ji]/_l-~)~-!~i!ij,t_s:~ .. e-n:i!ssi_o_ns_:ofn!~i~~ ·· e~ssions_.t11rougl:l _the_S~A,QMD.~s Contlo_l 

oxides,:.'particuJare1m<ltter, anCI loxic ai_T MeaSUr_e'cMB"i-Oi._::/FurthCr:Ifecfuctions "frOfn 

:-OOritanliRiintS ·fi.oini'h'e1manufacture of. NOx--R-EC:'C~~.{~CUry-ent n.11e~i~g __ 

··POit1aiiCl'cemen1:. . ·proposes tO IO~et.the;-curreRt BARCT.-limifof 

-.. !JEO~Nl!~g-:_cJ!y _r(>ll_i~g-~ly~g~ __ ~f ~~:J~oeT~~~t~O~i~~@~~~(,:fh_~ -~0Ji9~ nitr<>8;en:oXides' emissionsfrom-the kiln amendment to the·NOx RECEAIM:is', Shai11Jiot·exce'ed.i3::pounds.per.t0n·:or-' CUC~ntl.Y uRderWa~.-- - -·- - --- - -· 

difiker Pti>dUCCd; . ~ThT"30~peI:itiDi_daY r_ol_li_Rg aye_rage _of-: _ 

totlf,hfdroc~bon .-;_emissi-Onsfrom the-kiln: 

Shii.11 nol'exceed24 ppmv. ·dry. at-7._ percent 

·oxygen:; _or as a~atteJR-~tiv·e~ ·provided the Pic>.v~_S_iO~s Ors~-~-00.9.:1_3_493 ~ave be_en cOnip_1etf<l.:tl!e~~~OP~~!1g _day:.:roi_l_i_ilg--

average_ Of to_tal_:orga:nic Hazardous:·A_ir 

Poliutints (HAP):CmlssiOns ·from' the. kiIIl 

S_haIF~Ot ~Xc~ed ., 12 ·1:1pmv .. dr)"; ~t .7. ·percent 

OXVi!en: 

. 8 

• i 

- --~;: . 

. --~.,-

,.•.; 

.· ~:'d 

'" ""'~. 

,- .< .. •., 

/. 

-'" , . __ ;. 
I .. ., 

,. 

,· 

( 

' 

I. 

I 

~;'. -·'· 

·.· 

.. 

.-

. ·' 

···~·~ _\"."· 

~-

. . 

.. 

"::.; " 

,;· 

: : -::, 

-~·.· 1"• 

-.-::;· .,~:;· 

,· 

-· 

•! 

·. 

·' 

- -·· . '·" -. :-,. ~ 

7~.---- ='' :~_._ 

''· 

... 

.•. 

-.. :_; . ~~i ·r::.~T9.~~ ·-=· .• _.. 

,"'\. "•"-:I.". 

.,. 

,, .. r.,; r. 

_';.,:.,.:,;! t:' 

I 

·~1 

_ ..• -

'-;!. 

.! 

., 

;,, .... ·. L ',-'.' 

J ... 

·:-!· 

', '. '· . . 

- ~ -. 0-

-' l,. . f\; .._ 

. . 

. ' 

r. c-. 

~- .. l 

! . 1•; 

1· 

'. 

:!;'· 

. 

--:,•. 

.. 

.·. 

·::-.:' .. s·.-.... -.~r..;:· 

;11~- ~-.. 

·::-.- ,.:;J 

-~ .. 

. •' 

. '· .. I : '-' .~ 

.:, .,_,__ 

.. ;, .. ~· ' .. 

•f 

.:.' 'J:.'".T.': "-".• 

<--

1..-.~· " ..... 

_,_ -

• 

·'I'. 

•,';;o' 

~-;,~~ 

- . ·..:... ~ . .. -· . ._· . .. -·~ 

., .-. 

..... 

..· 

- 't . 

.. :~~1 · . \,• 

./'· -.r. :. 

.;t:: ~):._~ .:~ ~- . ... ,; .;-:I 

. '.'-,i·.-.. 

. ' ' . . - <' • -··· '::': ._,·. 

;_: ~ .. _ .. 

~ ... ,' .-- .. ~ ,..s../ M,.~ _,:· 

'· 

, . 

' 

·,: 

1!:> 

.. 

:~ 

0 

-' 

~~ 

' .. , 

i 

;) 
i 

I· 

I 

' . 

-· 

, .. '' . 

---.,--.----..---.- .. ---;;,,.-- 

~.~, 

, . ..i 

. ' 

; __ . 

REFERENCES - ~' - ., .. , 

·1. Wann-.Mix Asphalt:' European.Pl-actice;.I.ftternati<>nai iechh<>l<>gy; $caI1hjiig · 

Program, Flfwh\~PLcOS'-007,, Fefirti!ll'y 2QO$,J;JlwA"fWIE>,V:!i, (Departme11t of 

~ransporta.tion, Wa.sl:tingtQn, pc, us~. (www.intemationalJnwa.dot:gov) 

2. Farshidi •. F~&Jones, b:& Kumar, A.& Green, P.d,& Hawey,.J:t., ''biiect 

•fueasiJr~m-ents .. 6fV9Ja~le·anclsem1_y()J<]Jil~ org[1lic•CO[IlPQl!Ild~fromi1lc)t;;and•WarJI1 

!Ili.x·.a:sphaJtP ,'frahsp Res Bqa,rd, ~QL 2207, 201J; p.l-10 . 

' 

R-J 

j 

. ,[ 

... , 

-1' 

'I 

·I