1 

In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

Filed: October 16, 2014 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * UNPUBLISHED 

DESIREE ROBERTS, * No. 13-669V 

 * 

Petitioner, * 

* Special Master Dorsey 

v. * 

 * Attorney’s Fees and Costs; 

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Reasonable Amount Requested to which 

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Respondent Does not Object. 

 * 

 Respondent. * 

 * 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * 

Jeffrey S. Pop, Beverly Hills, CA, for petitioner. 

Lindsay Corliss, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. 

ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS DECISION1

On September 11, 2013, Desiree Roberts (“petitioner”) filed a petition pursuant to the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.2 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2006). 

Petitioner alleged that she suffered “severe anaphylactic responses and chronic cross reactive 

allergic reactions to non-vaccine related antigenic stimuli” that was caused or substantially 

aggravated by an MMR vaccine administered to her on September 22, 2010. See Petition at 1-2. 

On September 8, 2014, a decision was entered based on the parties’ stipulation awarding 

compensation to petitioner. 

 

1

 Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for the undersigned’s action in this case, 

the undersigned intends to post this decision on the website of the United States Court of Federal 

Claims, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899, 

2913 (Dec. 17, 2002). As provided by Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has 14 days within which 

to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or 

commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes 

medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted 

invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). Otherwise, the entire decision will be available to the 

public. Id. 

2

 The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National 

Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended, 

42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2006) (Vaccine Act or the Act). All citations in this decision to 

individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C.A. § 300aa. 

 
2 

On October 16, 2014, the parties filed a Stipulation of Facts Concerning Final Attorneys’ 

Fees and Costs. According to the stipulation, the parties stipulate to a total award to petitioner of 

attorney’s fees and costs in the amount of $22,636.66. In accordance with General Order #9, 

petitioner’s counsel represents that petitioner did not personally advance any reimbursable costs 

in pursuit of his claim. 

 The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorney’s fees and costs. 42 U.S.C. § 

300 aa-15(e). Based on the reasonableness of the parties’ stipulation, the undersigned GRANTS 

the request for approval and payment of attorney’s fees and costs. 

Accordingly, an award should be made as follows: 

in the form of a check jointly payable to petitioner and to petitioner’s attorney, Jeffrey S. 

Pop, in the amount of $22,636.66. 

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of 

the court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with the terms of the parties’ 

stipulation.3

 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 s/Nora Beth Dorsey 

 Nora Beth Dorsey 

 Special Master

 

3

 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment is expedited by the parties’ joint filing of 

notice renouncing the right to seek review.