alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1191 

Honoring the World Food Program on the occasion of being awarded the 

2020 Nobel Peace Prize. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 16, 2020 

Mr. ADERHOLT (for himself, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. DUNCAN, Ms. FUDGE, Ms. 

LEE of California, Mr. WELCH, Mr. GREEN of Texas, Ms. NORTON, Mr. 

GONZALEZ of Texas, Mr. TRONE, Mr. CICILLINE, Mr. BROWN of Maryland, Ms. PINGREE, Mr. FLEISCHMANN, Mr. MARSHALL, Mr. SMITH of 

Washington, Mr. KILMER, Ms. MENG, Mr. CRAWFORD, and Mr. 

FITZPATRICK) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the World Food Program on the occasion of being 

awarded the 2020 Nobel Peace Prize. 

Whereas, on October 9, 2020, the Norwegian Nobel Committee announced that the Nobel Peace Prize for 2020 

has been awarded to the United Nations World Food 

Program (WFP) ‘‘for its efforts to combat hunger, for its 

contribution to bettering conditions for peace in conflictaffected areas and for acting as a driving force in efforts 

to prevent the use of hunger as a weapon of war and conflict’’; 

Whereas the WFP is the world’s largest humanitarian organization addressing hunger and promoting food security; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1191 IH 

Whereas, in 2019, 135 million people suffered from acute 

hunger, and in that year, the WFP provided nutrition assistance to nearly 100 million people in 88 countries; 

Whereas, in 2020, the coronavirus pandemic has contributed 

to a significant increase in the number of victims of hunger in the world, and in order to meet this compounded 

need, the WFP has surged its capacity; 

Whereas the United States makes available more than 40 

percent of the WFP’s annual resources; 

Whereas the WFP has stated, ‘‘Until the day we have a medical vaccine, food is the best vaccine against chaos’’; and 

Whereas in its announcement, the Nobel Committee stated, 

‘‘The work of the World Food Programme to the benefit 

of humankind is an endeavour that all the nations of the 

world should be able to endorse and support’’: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) joins the other nations of the world in— 

3 (A) affirming the mission of the World 

4 Food Program on the occasion of being award5 ed the 2020 Nobel Peace Prize; and 

6 (B) supporting the leadership of World 

7 Food Program Executive Director, David 

8 Beasley, and the contributions of the more than 

9 17,000 World Food Program staff world-wide; 

10 and 

11 (2) remains committed to the international 

12 community’s goal to end hunger, achieve food secuVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:48 Oct 16, 2020 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR1191.IH HR1191

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1191 IH 

1 rity, and improve nutrition through the work of the 

2 World Food Program. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
ELECTRONIC RECORD mil-/*

COA# 01-14-00251-CR OFFENSE: 22.011 (Sexual Assault)

Richard A. Dunsmore v. The State

STYLE: ofTexas COUNTY: Brazoria

COA DISPOSITION: DISMISS TRIAL COURT: 412th Judicial District Court

DATE: 09/09/2014 Publish: NO TCCASE#: 56909

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

i*it-/y Richard A. Dunsmore v. The State of 111!Of til

STYLE: Texas CCA #: 1 *♦•»"" f •

PRO SE Petition CCA Disposition:

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: DATE:

/f20-J«f

mi-/«f

R^ft/jgb JUDGE:

DATE: 0<9-lv(i&/f

JUDGE: /£*• CfAAMhr^

SIGNED:

PUBLISH:

PC:

DNP:

MOTION FOR

REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:

ELECTRONIC RECORD
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Statement of Financial Condition for Princeton Mining Company at December 31,
1996 (unaudited) and the Statement of Income for the year ended December 31,
1996 (unaudited) and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             108
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   108
<PP&E>                                         300,688
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 300,796
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          296,386
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       300,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   (295,590)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   300,796
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                34,578
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              (34,578)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (34,578)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (34,578)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (34,578)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.012)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.012)







</TABLE>
#### Armstrong v. Bromley Quarry & Asphalt, Inc.

109,864

01/25/2016

Granted.

Unpublished
# City 

# of o/isa(ia Office

# of tlie ::Mayor

425CE.ast Oak/Lvenue, Ste. 301, o/isaEia, 

### CJl 93. CJ'e{: 

### (559) 713-4512 PCT:G· (559) 713-4800

StevenA. Nelsen September 24, 2014 Mayor
E. Warren Gubler Vice Mayor GregoryF. Collins Councilmember

Bob Link Councilmember AmyShuklian Councilmember ScottFaulk U.S. Department ofTransportation Office ofAviation Analysis EAS & Domestic Analysis Division 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590

Re: OrderNo. 2007-6-13 DearMr. Faulk: 

### ·'

The City of Visalia appreciates the opportunity to comment on the various proposals submitted in responseto Orderno. 2014-5-9, dated May 21, 2014. City Council Members, at their meeting on September 15, 2014, discussed the merits of all five (5) proposals as well as the Community Flexibility Pilot Program and formally adopted a motion "Authorizing the Mayor to sign a letter, to the Department of Transportation, supporting SeaPort Airlines as the carrierto be awarded the EAS contractfor Visalia." Prior to the "Order Requesting Proposals" by the Department ofTransportation, the City ofVisalia had experienced degradation in servicelevels as a result ofseveral regulation changes to the airline industry. Consequently, the City was pleasantly surprised to see so many proposals submitted. With so many proposals, the City spent a significant amount of time reviewing and comparing the proposals, which were all varied and somewhatunique in their own offerings. During the City's review process, the air service subcommittee placed a priority on the proposals that they felt gave the City the best chance of ending the next fiscal year below the mandated $200 per passenger subsidy cap. After reviewing and comparing all of the proposals, the subcommittee recommended, and Council agreed, that the community had the best chance ofgrowing air service with the SeaPort proposal. With three (3) daily destinations and fares starting at $59 (guaranteed for the first full year ofoperation), itis the City'sbeliefthat the servicecould achieve the average loadfactor of45% thatis neededto keep the subsidybelow $200perpassenger. All indications are that SeaPort Airlines is preparedto start service within 90 days ofcontract award and is willing to work with the City to grow the market and be a true partner with our community in working towards increasing passengers and reducing the subsidy atVisalia. The City of Visalia appreciates the Essential Air Service program and the opportunity it offers the community to continue to have air service. Providing air service is an important aspect ofour economic development efforts, andis also key to our long-term alternative transportation and air quality objectives. Respectfully,

## /~~~ SteveNelsen Mayor
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 51 (Monday, March 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12664-12665]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6554]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Niobrara National Scenic River Advisory Commission

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice sets the schedule for the forthcoming meeting of 
the

[[Page 12665]]

Niobrara National Scenic River Advisory Commission. Notice of this 
meeting is required under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Public 
Law 92-463).

DATES: Wednesday, March 26, 1997; 1:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: American Legion Post, 201 E. Buchanan, Bassett, Nebraska.
    In case of inclement weather an alternate date is set, as follows:

SNOW DATE: Wednesday, April 9, 1997; 1:30 p.m.

ADDRESS: American Legion Post, Bassett, Nebraska.

AGENDA: (1) Discussion of the counties progress in developing a 
management council for the Niobrara National Scenic River; (2) Review 
and discussion of L.B. 656, to provide state funding for operation of 
the Niobrara Council; (3) The opportunity for public comment and 
proposed agenda, date, and time, of the next Advisory Group meeting. 
The meeting is open to the public. Interested persons may make oral/
written presentation to the Commission or file written statements. 
Requests for time for making presentations may be made to the 
Superintendent prior to the meeting or to the Chairman at the beginning 
of the meeting. In order to accomplish the agenda for the meeting, the 
Chairman may want to limit or schedule public presentations.
    The meeting will be recorded for documentation and a summary in the 
form of minutes will be transcribed for dissemination. Minutes of the 
meeting will be made available to the public after approval by the 
Commission members. Copies of the minutes may be requested by 
contacting the Superintendent. An audio tape of the meeting will be 
available at the headquarters office of the Niobrara/Missouri National 
Scenic Riverways in O'Neill, Nebraska.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Superintendent Warren Hill, Niobrara/
Missouri National Scenic Riverways, P.O. Box 591, O'Neill, Nebraska 
68763-0591, or at 402-336-3970.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Advisory Commission was established by 
the law that established the Niobrara National Scenic River, Public Law 
102-50. The purpose of the group, according to its charter, is to 
advise the Secretary of the Interior on matters pertaining to the 
development of a management plan, and management and operation of the 
Scenic River. The Niobrara National Scenic River consists of a 76-mile 
segment from Borman Bridge, southeast of Valentine, downriver to State 
Highway 137.

    Dated: February 27, 1997.
William W. Schenk,
Field Director, Midwest Field Area.
[FR Doc. 97-6554 Filed 3-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7805

WILLIE MORRIS MCBRIDE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

WILLIAM F. RUTHERFORD, Judge; MORRIS B.

GUTTERMAN, Judge; LYDIA CALVERT TAYLOR, Judge;

CHARLES D. GRIFFITH, JR.; NORMAN A. THOMAS;

THOMAS C. DANIEL,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-97-430)

Submitted: October 20, 1998 Decided: November 3, 1998

Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Willie Morris McBride, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Willie Morris McBride appeals from the district court’s order

dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.

1998) complaint. The district court’s dismissal without prejudice

is not appealable. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers’ Local

Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). A dismissal

without prejudice is a final order only if “‘no amendment [in the

complaint] could cure the defects in the plaintiff’s case.’” Id. at

1067 (quoting Coniston Corp. v. Village of Hoffman Estates, 844

F.2d 461, 463 (7th Cir. 1988)). In ascertaining whether a dismissal

without prejudice is reviewable in this court, the court must

determine “whether the plaintiff could save his action by merely

amending his complaint.” Domino Sugar, 10 F.3d at 1066-67. In this

case, McBride may move in the district court to reopen his case and

to file an amended complaint specifically alleging facts sufficient

to state a claim under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983. Therefore, the dismissal

order is not appealable. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for

lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
No. 12-5838.

#### Winbush *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 23.1 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

We consent to the inclusion in thisAnnual Report (Form 10-K) of Robbins & Myers, Inc. and Subsidiaries of our reports dated October 27, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Robbins & Myers, Inc. and Subsidiaries, and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Robbins & Myers, Inc. and Subsidiaries included in the Annual Report to Shareholders of Robbins & Myers, Inc. and Subsidiaries for the year-ended August 31, 2011.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8’s) pertaining to the Stock Option Plan forNon-Employee Directors (No.33-43625, dated November 1, 1991), 1994 Directors’ Stock Compensation Plan (No. 33-84032, dated September 13, 1994), Robbins & Myers, Inc. 1994 Long-term Incentive Stock Plan (No. 333-00291, datedJanuary 19, 1996), Robbins & Myers, Inc. 1995 Stock Option Plan for Non-employee Directors (No. 333-00293, dated January 19, 1996), Robbins & Myers, Inc. 1999 Long-term Incentive Stock Plan (No. 333-35856, datedApril 28, 2000 and 333-81558 dated January 29, 2002), the Robbins & Myers, Inc. 2004 Stock Incentive Plan as Amended (No. 333-121899, dated January 7, 2005), the Registration Statement (Form S-3, No. 333-31235, datedJuly 14, 1997) pertaining to Investor Stock Purchase Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-3 ASR, No. 333-152874, dated August 8, 2008, as amended by Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 filed on October 30, 2009) pertaining toan offering by a selling shareholder, and Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 on Form S-8 to Form S-4 Registration Statement (No. 333-170502, dated January 10, 2011) pertaining to the T-3 Energy Services, Inc. 2002 Stock Incentive Plan (AsAmended and Restated Effective June 14, 2010), of our report dated October 27, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Robbins & Myers, Inc. and Subsidiaries, and the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting of Robbins & Myers, Inc. and Subsidiaries, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Robbins & Myers, Inc. and Subsidiaries for the year ended August 31, 2011. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

Cincinnati, Ohio

October 27, 2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial infomration extracted from
     LONGHORN, INC.  March 31, 1999 financial statements and is 
     qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                         0000819818
<NAME>                        LONGHORN, INC.

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999

<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999

<CASH>                                                   0
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                          (1,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             0
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          0
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                             0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>
# table6
I N T HE S UPREME C OURT O F T HE S TATE O F M ONTANA DA 21

– 0593 L ANCE M ILLION , Claimant, Objector and Appellant ,

v. S TATE OF M ONTANA , A TTORNEY G ENERAL , Objectors and Appellee s . ORDER GRANTING STATE’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE BRIEF

Upon consideration of Objectors and Appellees’ motion for a 30

- day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, Objectors and Appellees are granted an extension of time to and including May 3, 2022, within which to prepare, s erve, and file their Response Brief.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court March 28 2022

03/28/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0593
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-01-1995
<CASH>                                          16,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,140,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  5,567,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,491,000
<PP&E>                                      33,251,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              14,411,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              30,923,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       26,763,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                     9,357,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (6,028,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                30,923,000
<SALES>                                     13,158,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,158,000
<CGS>                                       11,406,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,678,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                25,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             337,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                118,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   118,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05
        

</TABLE>
No. 11-10951.

#### Scott *v.*Iowa Department of Corrections et al.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
RESOLVED,  that effective March 19, 1998, the Fixed Benefit Option provision of
the  Deferred  Compensation  Plan  for  Non-Management  Directors  be amended to
provide  that,  with  respect  to  any  Director  with deferrals under the Fixed
Benefit  Option  who  dies after March 19, 1998 but prior to retirement from the
Board,  his  or  her beneficiary under the Plan shall receive the greater of the
15-year certain Retirement Income Benefit or the 15-year certain Survivor Income
Benefit;  and

FURTHER  RESOLVED, that J. P. Mulcahy, W. P. McGinnis and C. S. Sommer, and each
of  them, be, and they hereby are, authorized to do any and all acts and execute
any  and  all  documents  deemed  necessary or desirable to effect the foregoing
amendment.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. §1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Arrhythmia Research Technology, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned Chief Financial Officer certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

||
||