alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of AEI Real Estate  Fund
XVII Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the
period  ended  June  30, 2008, as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on  the  date hereof  (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned, Robert P. Johnson, President of AEI Fund  Management
XVII, Inc., the Managing General Partner of the Partnership,  and
Patrick  W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer of AEI Fund Management
XVII,  Inc., each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Partnership.


                          /s/ Robert P Johnson
                              Robert P. Johnson, President
                              AEI Fund Management XVII, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              August 8, 2008



                          /s/ Patrick W Keene
                              Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer
                              AEI Fund Management XVII, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              August 8, 2008
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2008-NM-167-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities'!

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska. where aviation might be the only mode of

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
<PAGE>   1

EXHIBIT 23

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS




To the Board of Directors
Roadway Express, Inc.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of Roadway Express, Inc. of our report dated January 21, 2000, included in the
1999 Annual Report to Shareholders of Roadway Express, Inc.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Roadway Express,
Inc. listed in Item 14(a). This schedule is the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In
our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when considered
in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly
in all material respects the information set forth therein.


                                                      /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

                                                      ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Akron, Ohio
March 21, 2000
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________________

No. 96-30038

Summary Calendar

_______________________

LARRY HARDY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

PARISH OF TANGIPAHOA; CITY OF AMITE, LA;

DUNCAN S KEMP, III, District Attorney,

District Attorney’s Office for the City of Amite, Louisiana;

DIANNE OSBY; RICHARD P IEYOUB,

Attorney General for the State of Louisiana,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

(95-CV-2437-T)

_________________________________________________________________

August 12, 1996

Before JONES, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

In this appeal, Larry Hardy challenges the district

court’s refusal to grant declaratory and injunctive relief against

the operation of LSA R.S.9:936, the Louisiana Paternity Statute.
2

Hardy was named in a paternity suit filed in Tangipahoa Parish,

provoking him to institute this action, but the paternity case was

almost immediately dropped, apparently because of mistaken

identity. Hardy nevertheless wished to pursue a challenge to the

statute’s constitutionality and a defamation action against the

appellees including the district attorney and maternal complainant.

Hardy makes no attempt even to argue on appeal that his

challenge to the statute’s constitutionality is not moot. The

paternity case against him was dismissed only sixteen days after he

filed this federal lawsuit, and he was never required to submit to

a blood test. He no longer has any legitimate contest with the

city, county or state authorities regarding the statute. The

district court properly dismissed this part of his case.

Hardy also contends that the district court’s dismissal

of his defamation claim should be reversed and remanded for further

proceedings. We are not certain why the district court dismissed

this claim, inasmuch as Hardy declined to furnish a transcript, and

the district court’s order, contained in the record excerpts,

states that the judge dismissed “for reasons enunciated in open

court.” Nevertheless, it appears obvious that the court dismissed

either because Hardy’s allegations of defamation are wholly vague

and conclusional or because the judge believed the state law claim

is now better heard in state court. Either of these grounds is

fully sustainable on appeal. Hardy’s brief to this court makes no

effort to explain the facts behind the defamation claim, his
3

pleadings in the trial court were similarly sketchy, and there is

no record that he attempted to amend. 

For these reasons, the district court’s judgment of

dismissal, without prejudice as to the defamation claim only, is

AFFIRMED.
No. 12-5467.

#### Mastowski *v.*Lempke, Superintendent, Five Points Correctional Facility.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 57 (Tuesday, March 25, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14171-14172]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-7498]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request For Review of a 
Revised Information Collection: Forms RI 20-7 and RI 30-3

AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Public 
Law 104-13, May 22, 1995), this notice announces that the Office of 
Personnel Management has submitted to the Office of Management and 
Budget a request for clearance of a revised information collection. RI 
20-7, Representative Payee Application, is used by CSRS and FERS to 
collect information from persons applying to be fiduciaries for 
annuitants or survivor annuitants who appear to be incapable of 
handling their own funds or for minor children. RI 30-3, Information 
Necessary for a Competency Determination, collects medical

[[Page 14172]]

information regarding the annuitant's competency for OPM's use in 
evaluating the annuitant's condition.
    Approximately 12,480 RI 20-7 forms will be completed annually. Each 
form requires approximately 30 minutes to complete. The annual burden 
is 6,240 hours. Approximately 250 RI 30-3 forms will be completed 
annually. Each form requires approximately 1 hour to complete. The 
total annual burden is 6,490 hours.
    For copies of this proposal, contact Jim Farron on (202) 418-3208, 
or E-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2d47404b4c5f5f42436d404c444103425d40034a425b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c7adaaa1a6b5b5a8a987aaa6aeabe9a8b7aae9a0a8b1">[email protected]</span></a>.

DATES: Comments on this proposal should be received within 30 calendar 
days from the date of this publication.

ADDRESSES: Send or deliver comments to--
Lorraine E. Dettman, Chief, Operations Support Division, Retirement and 
Insurance Service, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, 
NW, Room 3349, Washington, DC 20415, and
Joseph Lackey, OPM Desk Officer, Office of Information & Regulatory 
Affairs, Office of Management & Budget, New Executive Office Building, 
NW, Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503.

FOR INFORMATION REGARDING ADMINISTRATIVE COORDINATION--CONTACT: Mary 
Beth Smith-Toomey, Management Services Division, (202) 606-0623.

U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
James B. King,
Director.
[FR Doc. 97-7498 Filed 3-24-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
AFS

- 13

- 3 30

- E May 16, 2016

Exemption No. 10768

Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 20 1 3

- 03 56

Ms

. Emma Dunne

Parent of Tessa Dunne

78 Trimleston,

Balbriggan, Co Dublin

Dea r Ms. Dunne :

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our

decision, explains its basis, and lists the conditions and limitations of the exemption,

including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

B y letter received April 1 5 , 2013 , you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administrat ion (FAA)

on behalf of Tessa Dunne for an exemption from § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B) of Title 14, Code of

Federal Regulations (14 CFR)

. That exemp tion , if granted, would allow Te ssa to exceed the

specified weight limit for an FAA

- approved child restraint system (CAReS, manufactured by

AmSafe Corporation ) during use of that child restraint system (CRS) aboard a United States

(U.S.) aircraft.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exem ption would not set a precedent and any

delay in acting on this petition would be det rimental to Tessa

.

The FAA has issued grants of exemption in circums tances similar in all material respects to

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9834 (copy enclosed), the FAA

found that numerous p eople with physical challenges had previously completed flights using

restraint systems that addressed unique physical needs regarding safety, support, and security

in the same manner of operations as described in this petition. The FAA further found that the2

petition , if granted, would not set any new precedents regarding the use of restraint systems by

p ersons with disabilities.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that

—

• they do not differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed grant.

• the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed exemption also apply to the

situation you present ; and

• a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority containe d in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator

has delegated to me, I hereby grant Tessa Dunne exemption fr om 14 CFR § 121.311 (b)

. In

addition, any air carrier or commercial operator operating u nder part 121 while Tessa is

aboard its aircraft is gra n ted an exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b) to the extent necessary

to allow Tessa to use an FAA

- approved CRS aboa rd a U.S. aircraft.

All operations under this exemption must be conducted w ith at least one of Tessa ’s parents or a caregiver accompanying her

. Tessa Dunne may only occupy a passenger seat with no

passenger se ated behind her

. In addition, Tessa ’s parent or caregiver must carry a copy of this

exemption and advise the air carrier about the contents of the exemption at least 48 hours

before the date of each flight.

This exemption terminates on May 31 , 201 8 , unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerel y,

/s/

Michael J. Zenkovick

Acting Deputy Director, Flight Standards

Service

Enclosure
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 50781 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
ISAIS MENDOZA

- BARCENAS , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:16

- CR

- 89

- 1

Before KING, HAYNES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Isaias 1 Mendoza

Barcenas has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Mendoza

- Barcenas h a s not fi led a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4.

1 Mendoza

- Barcenas’s first name is sometimes misspelled as “Isais.” United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 18, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-50781 Document: 00513956482 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/18/2017No. 16

- 50781

2 nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 16-50781 Document: 00513956482 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/18/2017
# C_2022432EN.01003201.xml

| 14.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 432/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 432/32

---

Action brought on 23 September 2022 — Cyprus v EUIPO — Kolios (HALLOUMAKI)

(Case T-594/22)

(2022/C 432/40)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Republic of Cyprus (represented by: S. Malynicz, Barrister-at-Law)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Kolios AE Elliniki Viomichania Galaktos (Kilkis, Greece)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark HALLOUMAKI — Application for registration No 18 126 405

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 June 2022 in Case R 19/2022-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order that EUIPO and the other party to the proceedings before the EUIPO each bear their own costs and pay those of the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

order that EUIPO and the other party to the proceedings before the EUIPO each bear their own costs and pay those of the applicant.

Pleas in law

| — | The Board of Appeal infringed Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council by wrongly interpreting the services covered by the contested mark; |
| --- | --- |

—

The Board of Appeal infringed Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council by wrongly interpreting the services covered by the contested mark;

| — | The Board of Appeal infringed Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council by failing to hold that consumers and the professional public could make a link between the specified services and the specified goods. |
| --- | --- |

—

The Board of Appeal infringed Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council by failing to hold that consumers and the professional public could make a link between the specified services and the specified goods.

---
<PAGE>   1




                                                                 EXHIBIT 23 (ii)


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
RVM Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries, as reporting company successor to Ravens
Metal Products, Inc., on Form S-8 of our report dated June 6, 1997 on our audit
of the consolidated financial statement of operations of RVM Industries, Inc.
for the year ended March 31, 1997, which report is included in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.

                                                 /S/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

Cleveland, Ohio
June 25, 1999



                                       59
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1201 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1201

Expressing support for the designation of April 18, 2021, as ``National 
                     Amateur Radio Operators Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 23, 2020

 Mrs. Lesko submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                 the Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing support for the designation of April 18, 2021, as ``National 
                     Amateur Radio Operators Day''.

Whereas amateur radio, or ``ham radio'', is an important hobby that brings 
        people together, regardless of profession, sex, or race;
Whereas amateur radio is the oldest form of digital communications;
Whereas amateur radio has played an invaluable role in developing new forms of 
        electronic communications;
Whereas amateur radio offers individuals a chance to learn new technological 
        skills;
Whereas groups such as Youngsters On the Air (YOTA) are working to ensure that 
        there is a next generation of amateur radio operators;
Whereas amateur radio groups and amateur radio clubs across the Nation provide 
        communities an important way to communicate with one another;
Whereas the amateur radio operator's code contains as a major principle ideals 
        that are important to country and community;
Whereas a key purpose of amateur radio is to have a group of skilled volunteers 
        to assist emergency responders in an event of a disaster;
Whereas members of the amateur radio community, such as the Amateur Radio 
        Emergency Service (ARES) have provided invaluable emergency 
        communications services following recent natural disasters, including 
        but not limited to helping coordinate disaster relief efforts following 
        Hurricanes Katrina, Wilma, and Maria and other extreme weather 
        disasters;
Whereas, on April 18, 1925, the first International Amateur Radio Union was 
        formed in Paris; and
Whereas April 18, 2021, would be an appropriate day for the celebration of 
        ``National Amateur Radio Operators Day'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the designation of ``National Amateur Radio 
        Operators Day'' and its celebration around the United States; 
        and
            (2) recognizes that continuing importance of amateur radio 
        operators and their role in bringing communities together in 
        times of need.
                                 <all>
```
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS P.O. BOX 12308,CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711 AjsesPQs^ OFFICIAL BUSINESS STATE OF TEXAS'/*'•'
3/25/2015 PRIVATE USE-*, „ |S& ooo655?458 mar26 2015 

## JOHNSON, KENNETH RAY Tr.Ct.'tiollStfmF* MA'^DFR0M W^S^OS This is to advise that the Court has" denied without written order on the findings of the trial court after hearing the application fof.writ of habeas corpus. Abel Acosta, Clerk

PRESIDING JUDGE 20TH DISTRICT COURT P O BOX 728 CAMERON, TX 76520 utf

3A'v'RS3B 7652D *1m'11Mf,%11 hM ll 1 * M

Kh 111m * M

"* ** I *' *1'1l' 11 TmI • I'll,m1**1
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1215 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1215

   Honoring the life and achievements of Lucretia Mott and the 140th 
                       anniversary of her death.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 12, 2020

Ms. Dean submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Honoring the life and achievements of Lucretia Mott and the 140th 
                       anniversary of her death.

Whereas November 11, 2020, marks the 140th anniversary of the passing of 
        Lucretia Mott in Cheltenham, Pennsylvania;
Whereas Lucretia Mott was born in January 1793, in Nantucket, Massachusetts;
Whereas, in 1833, Lucretia Mott was chosen as president of the Philadelphia 
        Female Anti-Slavery Society after traveling around the country giving 
        lectures on religion, slavery abolition, temperance, and peace;
Whereas, in 1840, Lucretia Mott met Elizabeth Cady Stanton at a World Anti-
        Slavery Conference, and because of their sex were denied the rights to 
        participate, thus beginning their fights to advance the rights of women;
Whereas, in 1848, Lucretia Mott and Elizabeth Cady Stanton launched the American 
        women's rights movement at the Seneca Falls Convention to discuss the 
        social, civil, and religious rights of women;
Whereas as a founder of the Seneca Falls Convention, Lucretia Mott, along with 
        Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Martha C. Wright, and Mary Ann McClintock, wrote 
        the Declaration of Sentiments, which stated that ``all men and women are 
        created equal'', and called for the extension of basic civil rights to 
        women, including the rights to hold property and to vote;
Whereas Lucretia Mott, with Elizabeth Cady Stanton, founded the organized 
        women's rights movement in the United States;
Whereas, in 1857, Lucretia Mott and her family moved to a farm called Roadside 
        in Cheltenham, Pennsylvania, which became a station in the Underground 
        Railroad for fugitive slaves to stop at before continuing their journeys 
        up North;
Whereas, in 1876, Mott represented the National Woman Suffrage Association and 
        called for the impeachment of United States leaders due to taxation 
        without representation; and
Whereas, on November 11, 1880, Lucretia Mott passed away at 87 years of age: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) honors the life of Lucretia Mott and her achievements 
        as a suffragette and abolitionist; and
            (2) honors and, on behalf of the United States, expresses 
        deep appreciation for the outstanding and important service of 
        Lucretia Mott to her country.
                                 <all>
```
No. 12-5187.

#### Gaffney *v.*Tucker, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

Sup. Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied.