alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2022418EN.01004601.xml

| 31.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 418/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 418/46

---

Action brought on 1 September 2022 — Hästens Sängar v EUIPO — Mustang (Checked pattern in grey with darker horses)

(Case T-539/22)

(2022/C 418/59)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Hästens Sängar AB (Köping, Sweden) (represented by: M. Johansson, R. Wessman and S. Ljungblad, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Mustang — Bekleidungswerke GmbH & Co. KG (Schwäbisch Hall, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union pattern mark representing a checked pattern in grey with darker horses — European Union trade mark No 18 180 227

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 June 2022 in Case R 1731/2021-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision in so far as it annuls the decision of the Cancellation Division based on the conclusion in paragraph 39 of the contested decision that ‘[o]verall the signs [of the proprietor and the cancellation applicant] are similar’; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision in so far as it annuls the decision of the Cancellation Division based on the conclusion in paragraph 39 of the contested decision that ‘[o]verall the signs [of the proprietor and the cancellation applicant] are similar’;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs incurred by the proprietor. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs incurred by the proprietor.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council and the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council and the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union.

---
# Data for Table B31

# RSEs for Table B31
# C_2022368EN.01001501.xml

| 26.9.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 368/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.9.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 368/15

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul București (Romania) lodged on 3 June 2022 — VS, TU, RW v Ryanair DAC

(Case C-362/22)

(2022/C 368/22)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Tribunalul București

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants and appellants: VS, TU, RW

Defendant and respondent: Ryanair DAC

Question referred

[I]s Article 4(3) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (1) to be interpreted as meaning that the compensation provided for in Article 7, in conjunction with Article 4(3), is also payable to persons travelling with the person who is denied boarding and who, although not denied boarding themselves, no longer wish to travel or are no longer interested in travelling without the person who has been denied boarding[?]

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1).

---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 55 (Friday, March 21, 1997)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 13531]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-7385]





                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 55 / Friday, March 21, 1997 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 13531]]

                Presidential Determination No. 97-19 of March 11, 1997

                
Eligibility of NIS Countries: Georgia, Kazakstan, 
                Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Russia, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, and 
                Uzbekistan To Be Furnished Defense Articles and 
                Services Under the Foreign Assistance Act and the Arms 
                Export Control Act

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State

                Pursuant to the authority vested in me by section 
                503(a) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, as 
                amended, and section 3(a)(1) of the Arms Export Control 
                Act, I hereby find that the furnishing of defense 
                articles and services to the Governments of Georgia, 
                Kazakstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Turkmenistan, Russia, 
                Ukraine, and Uzbekistan will strengthen the security of 
                the United States and promote world peace.

                You are authorized and directed to report this finding 
                to the Congress and to publish it in the Federal 
                Register.

                    (Presidential Sig.)<Clinton1><Clinton2>

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, March 11, 1997.

[FR Doc. 97-7385
Filed 3-20-97; 8:45 am]
Billing code 4710-10-P
# FILED

October 12, 1998 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate C ourt Clerk IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE

AT JACKS ON (Heard at Memphis)

STATE OF TENNESSEE ) NO. 02S01-9711-CR-00094 ) Appellee ) ) v. ) SHELBY COU NTY ) DEWAYNE B. BUTLER, ) FREDRICK D. BUTLER, and ) ERIC D. ALEXANDER ) (Interlocutory Appeal) ) Appellants. ) ) AFFIRMED



### ORDER SUBSTITUTING OPI NION A ND JUDGMENT
It appearing to the Court that the original opinion in this case, filed September 14, 1998, inadvertentl y stated that mitigatin g circumstances must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Such a burden of proof is not r equired by the provisions of Tennessee Code Anno tated Sections 39-13-204(e)( 1) and 39-13-207(d).

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORD ERED, ADJUDG ED AND DECR EED that the attached opinion and judgment be, and the same hereby is, substi tuted for the opinion and judgment previously filed in this cause on September 14, 1998, without the further taxing of costs.

PER CURIAM
U.S. Energy Information Administration | Quarterly Coal Report, January - March 2024

Table 1. U.S. coal production, 2018 - 2024

(thousand short tons)

Year January - March April - June July - September October - December Total

2018 187,743 180,829 194,731 192,863 756,167

2019 179,817 179,781 181,461 165,250 706,309

2020 149,198 116,218 135,881 134,137 535,434

2021 140,130 142,674 148,272 146,355 577,431

2022 149,310 144,610 154,477 145,758 594,155

2023 148,706 142,338 145,605 140,836 577,485

2024 129,871 - - - 129,871

- = No data reported.

Note: Total may not equal sum of components because of independent rounding.

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration, Form 7000-2, 'Quarterly Mine Employment and Coal Production Report.'
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION 906
      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





I,
      James
      F. Wirth, Chief Executive Officer of InnSuites Hospitality Trust (the “Trust”),
      do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
      The
      Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Trust for the year ended January 31, 2007
      (the “Annual Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
      and





2.
      The
      information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Trust.








Date:
                May 1, 2007
            By:
            /s/   James
                F. WirthName:
                James F. WirthTitle:
                Chief Executive
                Officer
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74

38 40 42



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 1000 1500 2000 1000 18 12 06 00 07/24 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 24 Jul 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.41 N 76.30 WMeters AGL
EXHIBIT 11.1
                                                                     
 
                                                                     
 
                                   
       STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS RESEARCH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
           Calculation of Primary Earnings Per Common Share
                                   
                 (in thousands, except per share data)
                                   
                                   




                              Three Months        Nine Months
                            Ended September 30,   Ended September 30,

                             1996       1995      1996       1995
PRIMARY                                                        
                                                               
Average shares outstanding  33,104     31,203    32,685     30,765
                                                               
Net effect of dilutive stock                                  
  options after              1,602      1,314     2,075        315
  application of the
  treasury stock method
      Total                 34,706     32,517    34,760     31,080
                                                               
 Net income                $ 8,379    $ 5,889   $21,342    $ 9,405

                                                               
 Net income per share      $   .24    $   .18   $   .61    $   .30
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           4,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,588,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  3,518,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,721,000
<PP&E>                                      32,539,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              12,306,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              31,484,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,588,000
<BONDS>                                      9,700,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,895,000
<COMMON>                                     9,843,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (4,925,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                31,484,000
<SALES>                                     12,497,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,497,000
<CGS>                                       10,568,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,413,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             268,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                802,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    19,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   783,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.26


</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 23.1

Independent Auditors Consent

The Board of Directors
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Holdings, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 333-58386 and 333-92489) on Form S-3 and (Nos. 333-59690, 333-80595,
333-80597 and 333-83891) on Form S-8 of R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Holdings, Inc. of
our report dated January 28, 2003, except as to note 14, which is as of
February 14, 2003, and note 22, which is as of January 8,
2004, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of R.J.
Reynolds Tobacco Holdings, Inc. as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the
related consolidated statements of income, stockholders equity and
comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2002, which report appears in the December
31, 2002 amendment to annual report on Form 10-K/A of R.J. Reynolds Tobacco
Holdings, Inc. Our report refers to the adoption in 2002 of the
provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.

Our report also refers to the restatement of the
previously issued 2000 consolidated statements of income for the
reclassification of an income tax benefit from continuing operations
to discontinued operations.

/s/KPMG LLP

Greensboro, North Carolina
January 8, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-03-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-04-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-02-1998
<CASH>                                              14
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,790
<ALLOWANCES>                                       623
<INVENTORY>                                      4,278
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,740
<PP&E>                                           3,919
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,453
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,834
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,444
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            75
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,066
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,834
<SALES>                                          1,863
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,863
<CGS>                                            1,824
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,466
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    50
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  41
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,694)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,694)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.22)
        

</TABLE>
No. 12-5714.

#### Powell *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report
of Duke Energy Indiana, Inc. (Duke Energy Indiana) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David L. Hauser, Group
Executive and Chief Financial Officer of Duke Energy Indiana, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Duke Energy Indiana.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                          
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    DAVID L.
HAUSER                                                    
|David L. Hauser Group Executive
and Chief Financial Officer March 29, 2007
<PAGE>
 
                                 Exhibit 13.2


                        REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



Board of Directors
ALC Communications Corporation

We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of ALC Communications 
Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1995 and 1994, and the related 
consolidated statements of operations, cash flows, and preferred stock and 
stockholders' equity for the years then ended (not included herein). These 
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our 
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on 
our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing 
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain 
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting 
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes 
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by 
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. 
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of ALC 
Communications Corporation and subsidiaries at December 31, 1995 and 1994, and 
the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for the years 
then ended, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.




ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Detroit, Michigan
January 17, 1996
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,509
<PP&E>                                          14,452
<DEPRECIATION>                                (10,673)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   9,489
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           57,637
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       970,510
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,755,035)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,489
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    10
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,241
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (15,933)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (15,933)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (15,933)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.00)


</TABLE>
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed November 18, 2020.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

Nos. 3D19-245 and 3D19-324

Lower Tribunal Nos. 13-19313A, 11-30280C and 11-4311

________________

Quintin Vicks,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

Appeals from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Miguel M. de la O, 

Judge.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Jonathan Greenberg and Manuel 

Alvarez, Assistant Public Defenders, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Jeffrey R. Geldens, Assistant Attorney 

General, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, SCALES, and HENDON, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
No. 12-5701.

#### Gayekpar *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
AMENDMENT TO THE
                Texas Lime Company Bargaining Unit 401(k) Plan


Pursuant to Article XX, Section 20.01, of the Texas Lime Company Bargaining 
Unit 401(k) Plan (the "Plan"), Texas Lime Company (the "Employer"), hereby 
amends the Plan, effective November 9, 1997, as follows:

Section II, subsection A. of the Adoption Agreement is amended in the 
following manner:

	The maximum percentage of Compensation which a Participant may 
contribute to the Plan through Salary Reduction Contributions shall be 
increased to 20% from the current maximum of 6%.

Section IV, subsection B. and C. of the Adoption Agreement are amended by 
substituting the following selection:

	The Employer Matching Contribution shall equal 100% of the first 1% of 
an Employee's Compensation plus 50% of the next 1% of Compensation on which 
Salary Reductions are made.  Each Employee's aggregate contributions in
excess of 2% of Compensation shall not be matched.

	Effective November 9, 1998, the Employer Matching Contribution shall 
equal 100% of the first 100% of an Employee's Compensation plus 50% of the 
next 2% of Compensation on which Salary Reduction Contributions are made.  
Each Employee's aggregate contributions in excess of 3% of Compensation shall
not be matched.

As evidence of the adoption of this amendment, Texas Lime Company have caused
this amendment to be executed by the appropriate officers as of January 12, 
1998.

          Texas Lime Company                Scudder Investor Services, Inc.

      By: /s/ Timothy W. Byrne          By: /s/ Sydney S. Tucker
         -------------------------         -------------------------
   Title: President                  Title: Vice President 
    Date: January 12, 1998            Date: January 20, 1998