Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 47 / Tuesday, March 11, 1997 / Rules and Regulations 11079

Service, Federal Aviation

Administration, 800 Independence

Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591;

telephone (202) 267–8277.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This

amendment to part 97 of the Federal

Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 97)

establishes, amends, suspends, or

revokes Standard Instrument Approach

Procedures (SIAPs). The complete

regulatory description of each SIAP is

contained in official FAA form

documents which are incorporated by

reference in this amendment under 5

U.S.C. 552(a), 1 CFR part 51, and § 97.20

of the Federal Aviation Regulations

(FAR). The applicable FAA Forms are

identified as FAA Form 8260–5.

Materials incorporated by reference are

available for examination or purchase as

stated above.

The large number of SIAPs, their

complex nature, and the need for a

special format make their verbatim

publication in the Federal Register

expensive and impractical. Further,

airmen do not use the regulatory text of

the SIAPs, but refer to their graphic

depiction on charts printed by

publishers of aeronautical materials.

Thus, the advantages of incorporation

by reference are realized and

publication of the complete description

of each SIAP contained in FAA form

documents is unnecessary. The

provisions of this amendment state the

affected CFR (and FAR) sections, with

the types and effective dates of the

SIAPs. This amendment also identifies

the airport, its location, the procedure

identification and the amendment

number.

This amendment to part 97 is effective

upon publication of each separate SIAP

as contained in the transmittal. The

SIAPs contained in this amendment are

based on the criteria contained in the

United States Standard for Terminal

Instrument Approach Procedures

(TERPS). In developing these SIAPs, the

TERPS criteria were applied to the

conditions existing or anticipated at the

affected airports.

The FAA has determined through

testing that current non-localizer type,

non-precision instrument approaches

developed using the TERPS criteria can

be flown by aircraft equipped with

Global Positioning System (GPS)

equipment. In consideration of the

above, the applicable Standard

Instrument Approach Procedures

(SIAPs) will be altered to include ‘‘or

GPS’’ in the title without otherwise

reviewing or modifying the procedure.

(Once a stand alone GPS procedure is

developed, the procedure title will be

altered to remove ‘‘or GPS’’ from these

non-localizer, non-precision instrument

approach procedure titles.) Because of

the close and immediate relationship

between these SIAPs and safety in air

commerce, I find that notice and public

procedure before adopting these SIAPs

area, impracticable and contrary to the

public interest and, where applicable,

that good cause exists for making some

SIAPs effective in less than 30 days.

The FAA has determined that this

regulation only involves an established

body of technical regulations for which

frequent and routine amendments are

necessary to keep them operationally

current. It, therefore—(1) is not a

‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under

Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a

‘’significant rule’’ under DOT

Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44

FR 11034; February 26, 1979); of small

entities under the criteria of the

Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 97

Air Traffic Control, Airports,

Navigation (Air).

Issued in Washington, DC on March 4,

1997.

Thomas C. Accardi,

Director, Flight Standards Services.

Adoption of the Amendment

Accordingly, pursuant to the

authority delegated to me, part 97 of the

Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR

part 97) is amended by establishing,

amending, suspending, or revoking

Standard Instrument Approach

Procedures, effective at 0901 UTC on

the dates specified, as follows:

PART 97—STANDARD INSTRUMENT

APPROACH PROCEDURES

1. The authority citation for part 97 is

revised to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113,

40120, 44701; and 14 CFR 11.49(b)(2).

2. Part 97 is amended to read as

follows:

By amending: § 97.23 VOR, VOR/

DME, VOR or TACAN, and VOR/DME

or TACAN; § 97.27 NDB, NDB/DME;

§ 97.33 RNAV SIAPs; and § 97.35

COPTER SIAPs, identified as follows:

* * * Effective Mar 27, 1997

Sterling, CO, Sterling Muni, NDB or GPS

RWY 33, Amdt. 2 CANCELLED

Sterling, CO, Sterling Muni, NDB or GPS

RWY 33, Amdt. 2

Dalton, GA, Dalton Muni, NDB or GPS RWY

14, Orig CANCELLED

Dalton, GA, Dalton Muni, NDB RWY 14, Orig

Mitchellville, MD, Freeway, VOR or GPS

RWY 36, Orig

* * * Effective May 22, 1997

Cullman, AL, Folsom Field, NDB or GPS

RWY 20, Amdt 2A CANCELLED

Cullman, AL, Folsom Field, NDB RWY 20,

Amdt 2A

[FR Doc. 97–5898 Filed 3–10–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[PA069–4040, PA078–4041, PA083–4043;

FRL–5697–7]

Approval and Promulgation of Air

Quality Implementation Plans;

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania;

Approval of Source-Specific RACT

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

SUMMARY: EPA is approving a State

Implementation Plan (SIP) revision

submitted by the Commonwealth of

Pennsylvania. This revision establishes

and requires reasonably available

control technology (RACT) on three

major sources. The intended effect of

this action is to approve source-specific

RACT determinations which establish

the above-mentioned requirements in

accordance with Clean Air Act (CAA).

This action is being taken under section

110 of the CAA.

DATES: This final rule is effective May

12, 1997 unless by April 10, 1997,

adverse or critical comments are

received. If the effective date is delayed,

timely notice will be published in the

Federal Register.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to

David L. Arnold, Chief, Ozone/CO &

Mobile Sources Section, Mailcode

3AT21, U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency, Region III, 841 Chestnut

Building, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

19107. Copies of the documents relevant

to this action are available for public

inspection during normal business

hours at the Air, Radiation, and Toxics

Division, U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency, Region III, 841 Chestnut

Building, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

19107; the Air and Radiation Docket

and Information Center, U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency, 401

M Street, SW, Washington, DC 20460;

and Pennsylvania Department of

Environmental Protection, Bureau of Air

Quality, P.O. Box 8468, 400 Market

Street, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17105.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jeffrey M. Boylan, (215) 566–2094, at the

EPA Region III office or via e-mail at
11080 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 47 / Tuesday, March 11, 1997 / Rules and Regulations

boylan.jeffrey@ epamail.epa.gov. While

information may be requested via email, comments must be submitted in

writing to the above Region III address.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August

1, 1995, September 20, 1995, December

8, 1995 and September 13, 1996, the

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

submitted formal revisions to its State

Implementation Plan (SIP). The SIP

revisions that are the subject of this

rulemaking consist of RACT

determinations for three individual

sources of volatile organic compounds

(VOCs) located in Pennsylvania. This

rulemaking addresses those operating

permits pertaining to two facilities, and

one facility (Mercersburg Tanning

Company) with no plan approval or

operating permit as the facility has

ceased all operations. These facilities

are: 1) DMi Furniture, Inc. (Adams

County), 2) R. R. Donnelley & Sons

Company—West Plant (Lancaster

County), 3) Mercersburg Tanning

Company—(Franklin County).

Pursuant to section 182(b)(2) and

(182(f) of the CAA, Pennsylvania is

required to implement RACT for all

major VOC and NOX sources by no later

than May 31, 1995. The major source

size is determined by its location, the

classification of that area and whether it

is located in the ozone transport region

(OTR), which is established by the CAA.

The Pennsylvania portion of the

Philadelphia ozone nonattainment area

consists of Bucks, Chester, Delaware,

Montgomery, and Philadelphia Counties

and is classified as severe. The

remaining counties in Pennsylvania are

classified as either moderate or marginal

nonattainment areas or are designated

attainment for ozone. However, under

section 184 of the CAA, at a minimum,

moderate ozone nonattainment area

requirements (including RACT as

specified in section 182(b)(2) and 182(f))

apply throughout the OTR. Therefore,

RACT is applicable statewide in

Pennsylvania. The August 1, 1995,

September 20, 1995, December 8, 1995,

and September 13, 1996, Pennsylvania

submittals that are the subject of this

notice, are meant to satisfy the RACT

requirements for three sources in

Pennsylvania.

Summary of SIP Revision

The details of the RACT requirements

for the source-specific operating permits

can be found in the docket and

accompanying technical support

document. Briefly, EPA is approving

three RACT determinations as a revision

to the Pennsylvania SIP. Several of the

operating permits contain conditions

irrelevant to the determination of VOC

or NOX RACT. Consequently, these

provisions are not being included in this

approval for VOC or NOX RACT.

RACT

EPA is approving the operating permit

(OP #01–2001) for DMi Furniture, Inc.

located in Adams County. DMi

Furniture, Inc. is a wood furniture

manufacturer and is considered to be a

major source of VOC emissions. All DMi

spray booths use air assisted airless

application of coatings. In addition,

hybrid waterborne systems are to be

used for certain coating operations. DMi

expects a VOC emission reduction of

approximately 38% using the

reformulated hybrid waterborne system.

Operating permit (OP #01–2001) will

require, among other things, VOC

limitations for the following coatings:

Catalyzed Varnish Topcoat—1.8 lb

VOC/lb Solids

Waterborne Topcoat—0.8 lb VOC/lb

Solids

Basecoats—0.2 lb VOC/lb Solids

Print Line Inks—0.5 lb VOC/lb Solids

Print Line Sealers—4.5 lb VOC/lb Solids

Spray Sealers (tie coat)—3.9 lb VOC/lb

Solids

The permit specifies that VOC

emissions from this facility can never

exceed 370 TPY. The facility is also

required to keep monthly records of

coating usage, VOC emissions including

cleanup solvents such that compliance

with RACT requirements can be

determined.

Although the 25 Pa. Code, Section

129.52 is for surface coating processes,

Section 11 of Table I has not been

federally approved, subsequently

requiring this RACT determination for

DMi Furniture, Inc.

EPA is approving the operating permit

(OP #36–2026) for R. R. Donnelley &

Sons—West Plant located in Lancaster

County. R. R. Donnelley & Sons—West

Plant is primarily a lithographic

printing facility and is considered to be

a major source of VOC emissions. The

boilers are not subject to NOX RACT

requirements because the facilities

potential NOX emissions are less than

100 TPY.

The five (5) heatset web offset

lithographic printing presses ink and

dampening solutions on the webs are

dried by evaporation in high air velocity

natural gas fired dryers, with VOC

emissions from the dryers controlled by

two (2) thermal oxidizers. Operating

Permit (OP #36–2026) will require,

among other things, that destruction

removal efficiency (DRE) of the thermal

oxidizers be at least 90% for VOC’s and

combustion chamber temperatures be

maintained at least at 1375 °F. With

regard to capture efficiency parameters

listed in the permit, no actual site

testing has been done nor has a protocol

been established to substantiate CE

figures in condition #12. VOC content of

all heatset inks and fountain solutions

are not to exceed 45% and 3% by

weight respectively.

The five (5) non-heatset web offset

lithographic and two (2) letterpress

printing presses are not controlled by

add-on control devices. Operating

Permit (OP #36–2026) will require,

among other things, that VOC content of

all non-heatset inks and fountain

solutions are not to exceed 25% and 3%

by weight respectively.

Permit conditions will require

cleaning solutions to have a composite

partial vapor pressure not to exceed 10

mm Hg at 20 °C or VOC content not to

exceed 30% by weight. The company

will limit the use of higher vapor

pressure cleaning solvents to less than

5% by weight of the total manual

cleaning solvents used. In addition, the

company must keep all solvent laden

rags in closed containers when not in

use and keep all containers containing

VOC’s tightly closed when not in use.

Condition #6 requires the facility to

keep applicable records and reports in

accordance with 25 Pa. Code, Chapter

129.95 such that compliance with RACT

requirements can be determined.

Therefore, while no specific CE testing

is required by the permit, such testing

may be required in order to determine

compliance with the applicable RACT

requirements.

Although the entire Mercersburg

Tanning Company facility ceased

operations in October 1994, 25 PA.

Code, Chapter 127, Subchapter E does

not allow ERCs to be generated for

emission reductions otherwise required

by mandated programs. RACT is such

an applicable program for Mercersburg

Tanning Company. Therefore, EPA is

approving a RACT determination for

Mercersburg Tanning Company (no

permits due to facility shutdown)

located in Franklin County. RACT for

the facility is determined to be:

—Transfer of all leather coating operations to

Spray Lines A, B, and C beginning the

phaseout in October 1993.

—Spray Lines A and B, applying solvent

based coating, vented to a Regenerative

Thermal Oxidizer (RTO). Based on testing

results performed in May 1993, 100%

capture plus a destruction efficiency of

97% used to calculate VOC emissions from

Lines A and B.

—Spray Line C, applying water based

coatings (water content 70–90% by

volume). Coating restrictions on Line C

limited to the following: 3.5 lb VOC/gal

(less water) for base coats and 2.8 lb VOC/

gal (less water) for intermediate coat.
Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 47 / Tuesday, March 11, 1997 / Rules and Regulations 11081

—Cleaning solvents associated with Lines A

and B took place within booths and vented

to RTO. Water utilized as cleaning solvent

for Line C.

Mercersburg Tanning Company was a

leather coating operations facility and

considered a major source of VOC

emissions. In addition, EPA is using this

document to recognize the emission

reduction credits (ERCs) generated by

the shutdown of the Mercersburg

Tanning Company facility; a total of 20

tons of VOC per year.

The source-specific RACT emission

limitations that are being approved into

the Pennsylvania SIP are those that were

submitted on August 1, 1995, September

20, 1995, December 8, 1995 and

September 13, 1996, and are the subject

of this rulemaking notice. These

emission limitations will remain unless

and until they are replaced pursuant to

40 CFR part 51 and approved by the

U.S. EPA.

EPA is approving this SIP revision

without prior proposal because the

Agency views this as a noncontroversial

amendment and anticipates no adverse

comments. However, in a separate

document in this Federal Register

publication, EPA is proposing to

approve the SIP revision should adverse

or critical comments be filed. This

action will be effective May 12, 1997

unless, by April 10, 1997, adverse or

critical comments are received.

If EPA receives such comments, this

action will be withdrawn before the

effective date by publishing a

subsequent document that will

withdraw the final action. All public

comments received will then be

addressed in a subsequent final rule

based on this action serving as a

proposed rule. EPA will not institute a

second comment period on this action.

Any parties interested in commenting

on this action should do so at this time.

If no such comments are received, the

public is advised that this action will be

effective on May 12, 1997.

Final Action

EPA is approving three sourcespecific RACT determinations, two of

which involve operating permits and

one (Mercersburg Tanning Company)

which does not involve any type of

permit.

Nothing in this action should be

construed as permitting or allowing or

establishing a precedent for any future

request for revision to any state

implementation plan. Each request for

revision to the state implementation

plan shall be considered separately in

light of specific technical, economic,

and environmental factors and in

relation to relevant statutory and

regulatory requirements.

Administrative Requirements

A. Executive Order 12866

This action has been classified as a

Table 3 action for signature by the

Regional Administrator under the

procedures published in the Federal

Register on January 19, 1989 (54 FR

2214–2225), as revised by a July 10,

1995, memorandum from Mary Nichols,

Assistant Administrator for Air and

Radiation. The Office of Management

and Budget (OMB) has exempted this

regulatory action from E.O. 12866

review.

B. Regulatory Flexibility Act

The EPA’s actions under section 502

of the Act do not create any new

requirements, but simply address

operating permits programs submitted

to satisfy the requirements of 40 CFR

Part 70. Because this action does not

impose any new requirements, it does

not have a significant impact on a

substantial number of small entities.

Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act,

5 U.S.C. 600 et seq., EPA must prepare

a regulatory flexibility analysis

assessing the impact of any proposed or

final rule on small entities. 5 U.S.C. 603

and 604. Alternatively, EPA may certify

that the rule will not have a significant

impact on a substantial number of small

entities. Small entities include small

businesses, small not-for-profit

enterprises, and government entities

with jurisdiction over populations of

less than 50,000.

SIP approvals under section 110 and

subchapter I, part D of the CAA do not

create any new requirements but simply

approve requirements that the State is

already imposing. Therefore, because

the Federal SIP approval does not

impose any new requirements, the

Administrator certifies that it does not

have a significant impact on any small

entities affected. Moreover, due to the

nature of the Federal-State relationship

under the CAA, preparation of a

flexibility analysis would constitute

Federal inquiry into the economic

reasonableness of state action. The

Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its

actions concerning SIPs on such

grounds. Union Electric Co. v. U.S. EPA,

427 U.S. 246, 255–66 (1976); 42 U.S.C.

7410(a)(2).

C. Unfunded Mandates

Under section 202 of the Unfunded

Mandates Reform Act of 1995

(‘‘Unfunded Mandates Act’’), signed

into law on March 22, 1995, EPA must

prepare a budgetary impact statement to

accompany any proposed or final rule

that includes a Federal mandate that

may result in estimated costs to State,

local, or tribal governments in the

aggregate; or to private sector, of $100

million or more. Under section 205,

EPA must select the most cost-effective

and least burdensome alternative that

achieves the objectives of the rule and

is consistent with statutory

requirements. Section 203 requires EPA

to establish a plan for informing and

advising any small governments that

may be significantly or uniquely

impacted by the rule.

EPA has determined that the approval

action promulgated does not include a

federal mandate that may result in

estimated costs of $100 million or more

to either State, local, or tribal

governments in the aggregate, or to the

private sector. This federal action

approves pre-existing requirements

under State or local law, and imposes

no new Federal requirements.

Accordingly, no additional costs to

State, local, or tribal governments, or to

the private sector, result from this

action.

D. Submission to Congress and the

General Accounting Office

Under 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A) as added

by the Small Business Regulatory

Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, EPA

submitted a report containing this rule

and other required information to the

U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of

Representatives and the Comptroller

General of the General Accounting

Office prior to publication of the rule in

today’s Federal Register. This rule is

not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5

U.S.C. 804(2).

E. Petitions for Judicial Review

Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean

Air Act, petitions for judicial review of

this action, pertaining to the RACT

approval for DMi Furniture, Inc, R.R.

Donnelley & Sons—West Plant, and

Mercersburg Tanning Company, must be

filed in the United States Court of

Appeals for the appropriate circuit by

May 12, 1997. Filing a petition for

reconsideration by the Administrator of

this final rule does not affect the finality

of this rule for the purposes of judicial

review nor does it extend the time

within which a petition for judicial

review may be filed, and shall not

postpone the effectiveness of such rule

or action. This action may not be

challenged later in proceedings to

enforce its requirements. (See section

307(b)(2).)
11082 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 47 / Tuesday, March 11, 1997 / Rules and Regulations

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

Environmental protection, Air

pollution control, Hydrocarbons,

Incorporation by reference,

Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen

dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and

recordkeeping requirements.

Dated: February 13, 1997.

William T. Wisniewski,

Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.

40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52—[AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for part 52

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401–7671q.

Subpart NN—Pennsylvania

2. Section 52.2020 is amended by

adding paragraphs (c)(114) to read as

follows:

§ 52.2020 Identification of plan.

* * * * *

(c) * * *

(114) Revisions to the Pennsylvania

Regulations Chapter 129.91 through

129.95 pertaining to VOC and NOX

RACT, submitted on August 1, 1995,

September 20, 1995, December 8, 1995

and September 13, 1996 by the

Pennsylvania Department of

Environmental Protection:

(i) Incorporation by reference.

(A) Four letters dated August 1, 1995,

September 20, 1995, December 8, 1995

and September 13, 1996 from the

Pennsylvania Department of

Environmental Protection transmitting

three source-specific RACT

determinations; two of which involve

operating permits and one (Mercersburg

Tanning Company) which does not

involve any type of permit. The three

sources are:

(1) DMi Furniture, Inc. (Adams

County)—wood furniture manufacturer.

(2) R. R. Donnelley & Sons Company,

West Plant (Lancaster County)—printing

facility.

(3) Mercersburg Tanning Company

(Franklin County)—leather coating

facility.

(B) Operating Permits (OP):

(1) DMi Furniture, Inc.—OP #01–

2001, effective June 13, 1995, except for

the expiration date of the operating

permit.

(2) R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company,

West Plant—OP #36–2026, effective July

14, 1995, except for the expiration date

of the operating permit and the parts of

conditions 5, 9b & 20 pertaining to

Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP’s).

(ii) Additional material.

(A) Remainder of August 1, 1995,

September 20, 1995, December 8, 1995

and September 13, 1996 State submittals

pertaining to DMi Furniture, Inc, R. R.

Donnelley & Sons—West Plant, and

Mercersburg Tanning Company.

3. Section 52.2037 is amended by

adding paragraph (h) to read as follows:

§ 52.2037 Control Strategy: Carbon

monoxide and Ozone.

* * * * *

(h) VOC RACT determination for four

emission units at Mercersburg Tanning

Company—Franklin County: Spray

Lines 3 thru 7, Attic Line, Spray Lines

A and B, Spray Line C. The VOC RACT

determination is as follows: for Spray

Lines 3 thru 7; all work transferred to

Spray Lines A and B, for Attic Line; all

work transferred to Spray Line C, for

Spray Lines A and B; vented to a

Regenerative Thermal Oxidizer (RTO)

with required 100% capture efficiency

and 97% destruction efficiency, for

Spray Line C; coating restrictions of 3.5

lb VOC/gal (less water) on base coats

and 2.8 lb VOC/gal (less water) on

intermediate coats. VOC RACT for

cleaning solvents associated with Lines

A and B vented to RTO and water

utilized as cleaning solvent for Line C.

[FR Doc. 97–5974 Filed 3–10–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

40 CFR Part 86

[FRL–5702–3]

Extension of Interim Revised Durability

Procedures for Light-Duty Vehicles

and Light-Duty Trucks

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Removal of direct final rule

amendments.

SUMMARY: On November 15, 1996, EPA

published a direct final rule extending

the applicability of durability

regulations for light duty vehicles and

light duty trucks [61 FR 58618]. This

action was published without prior

approval because EPA anticipated no

adverse comments. Due to the receipt of

an adverse comment, EPA is removing

the amendments made by the direct

final rule and restoring the regulatory

text that existed prior to the direct final

rule.

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 11, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Linda Hormes, Environmental

Protection Agency, Office of Air and

Radiation, (313) 668–4502, 2565

Plymouth Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48105.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On

November 15, 1996, EPA published in

the Federal Register a direct final rule

extending indefinitely the applicability

of durability regulations for light duty

vehicles and light duty trucks [61 FR

58618]. The direct final rule was

published without prior proposal in the

Federal Register with a provision for a

thirty day comment period and a

statement that if adverse or critical

comments were received by this time,

the rule would be withdrawn and

resubmitted as a proposed rule. Due to

the receipt of an adverse comment

within the comment period, EPA is

removing the amendments made by the

direct final rule and is resubmitting

those amendments in a separate action

published elsewhere in this issue of the

Federal Register as a proposal. Because

the effective date of the direct final rule

was January 14, 1997, the regulatory

language which was amended has been

changed to read as it did prior to the

direct final rule.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 86

Environmental protection,

Administrative practice and procedure,

Confidential business information,

Motor vehicle pollution, Reporting and

recordkeeping requirements.

Dated: March 4, 1997.

Carol M. Browner,

Administrator.

For the reasons set forth in the

preamble, part 86 of chapter I, title 40

of the Code of Federal Regulations is

amended as follows:

PART 86—CONTROL OF AIR

POLLUTION FROM NEW AND IN-USE

MOTOR VEHICLES AND NEW AND INUSE MOTOR VEHICLE ENGINES:

CERTIFICATION AND TEST

PROCEDURES

1. The authority citation for part 86

continues to read as follows:

Authority: Sections 202, 203, 205, 206,

207, 208, 215, 216, 217, and 301(a), of the

Clean Air Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 7521,

7522, 7524, 7525, 7541, 7542, 7549, 7550,

7552, and 7601(a)).

§ 86.094–13 [Amended]

2. In § 86.094–13, paragraphs (a)(1),

(c)(1), (d)(1), (e)(1), and (f)(1) are

amended by revising the words ‘‘1994

and beyond’’ to read ‘‘1994 through

1998’’.

§ 86.094–26 [Amended]

3. In § 86.094–26, paragraphs (a)(2),

(b)(2)(i), and (b)(2)(ii) are amended by

revising the words ‘‘1994 and beyond’’

to read ‘‘1994 through 1998’’.

[FR Doc. 97–5878 Filed 3–10–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P