alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
City of Harlingen -- update

Moran, David to: Kevin Willis, Stacy Swigart, Elizabeth

Newman 03/26/2012 07:11 PM

Cc: "clyde@svatx.com", "mrclyde_2003@hotmail.com"

History: This message has been forwarded.

Dear Kevin, Beth and Stacy:

As you have requested, I wanted to update you further on developments undertaken by the City of

Harlingen, Valley International Airport. The City has received its bids for the work to be done on the

GA North expansion. The bids came in slightly higher that expected. Accordingly, as encouraged

and recommended by the Airport Board, the City Commission voted today to allocate an additional

$29,000 from the Airport budget to be added to the already approved $150,000 local match portion for

a grant application for the North GA expansion. Thus, the City has allocated and approved $179,000

in local match funds for the grant application which is being filed on Tuesday, March 27, 2012. I attach

a copy of the grant application for your review (omitted are some exhibits due to size limitations).

Also, the Valley International Airport Board voted to award a contract for the apron work, pending the

approval of the requested FAA grant funds.

We are hopeful that this work commences in relatively short order.

We also firmly believe that this action further demonstrates the City's commitment to its grant

assurances and we respectfully ask that this additional information be considered as part of the

existing Part 16 proceedings.

Mr. Kornegay is being copied on this email.

Thank you much for your consideration.

David

David T. Moran

Jackson Walker L.L.P.

901 Main Street

Suite 6000

Dallas, Texas 75202

214 953-6051

214 661-6677 (fax)

dmoran@jw.com
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 895 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 895

 To allow tribal grant schools to participate in the Federal Employee 
                        Health Benefits program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 30, 2019

 Mr. Johnson of South Dakota introduced the following bill; which was 
referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the 
  Committees on Oversight and Reform, and Energy and Commerce, for a 
 period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To allow tribal grant schools to participate in the Federal Employee 
                        Health Benefits program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Tribal School Federal Insurance 
Parity Act''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO THE INDIAN HEALTH CARE IMPROVEMENT ACT.

    Section 409 of the Indian Health Care Improvement Act (25 U.S.C. 
1647b) is amended by inserting ``or the Tribally Controlled Schools Act 
of 1988 (25 U.S.C. 2501 et seq.)'' after ``(25 U.S.C. 450 et seq.)''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 52 (Tuesday, March 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 12852]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6811]



[[Page 12852]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Office of the Secretary


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

March 13, 1997.
    The Department of Labor (DOL) has submitted the following public 
information collection request (ICR) to the Office of Management and 
Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork 
Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). A copy of 
this ICR, with applicable supporting documentation, may be obtained by 
calling the Department of Labor, Departmental Clearance Officer, 
Theresa M. O'Malley ([202] 219-5096 ext. 143). Individuals who use a 
telecommunications device for the deaf (TTY/TDD) may call [202] 219-
4720 between 1:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. Eastern time, Monday through 
Friday.
    Comments should be sent to Office of Information and Regulatory 
Affairs, Attn: OMB Desk Officer for Bureau of Labor Statistics, Office 
of Management and Budget, Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503 ([202] 395-
7316), within 30 days from the date of this publication in the Federal 
Register.
    The OMB is particularly interested in comments which:
    <bullet> Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is 
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, 
including whether the information will have practical utility;
    <bullet> Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the 
burden of the proposed collection of information, including the 
validity of the methodology and assumptions used;
    <bullet> Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the 
information to be collected; and
    <bullet> Minimize the burden of the collection of information on 
those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate 
automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection 
techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting 
electronic submission of responses.
    Agency: Bureau of Labor Statistics.
    Title: Work Schedules Supplement to the Current Population Survey.
    OMB Number: 1220-0119.
    Frequency: One-time.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Number of Respondents: 48,000.
    Estimated Time Per Respondent: 4.5 minutes.
    Total Burden Hours: 3,600.
    Total Annualized capital/startup costs: 0
    Total annual costs (operating/maintaining systems or purchasing 
services): 0.
    Description: The work schedules supplement will gather information 
on the work schedules of employed persons and on the number of 
characteristics of employed persons who do work at home.
Theresa M. O'Malley,
Departmental Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-6811 Filed 3-17-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-23-M
# table23
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7505

BILLY LEE LISENBY, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MARK MELTON; RICKEY QUICK; DONNIE HILL;

RICHARD ROLLINS; JOHN CRAWLEY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Florence. David C. Norton, District Judge.

(CA-96-3075-4-18BE)

Submitted: January 21, 1999 Decided: February 9, 1999

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Billy Lee Lisenby, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. L. Hunter Limbaugh,

Robert Thomas King, WILLCOX, MCLEOD, BUYCK & WILLIAMS, P.A.,

Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Billy Lee Lisenby, Jr., a South Carolina inmate, appeals the

district court’s order granting summary judgment on all but one of

his claims under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998). We dismiss

the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not

appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final

orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and

collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b);

Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The

order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable

interlocutory or collateral order.

We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
U.S. Energy Information Administration | Annual Coal Report 2022

Table 16. Recoverable Coal Reserves at Producing Underground Coal Mines by State and Mining Method, 2022

(million short tons)

Continuous Conventional and Other1 Longwall Total

Coal-Producing

State

Recoverable

Coal Reserves

at Producing

Mines

Recoverable

Coal Reserves

at Producing

Mines

Recoverable

Coal Reserves

at Producing

Mines

Recoverable

Coal Reserves

at Producing

Mines

Alabama 53 s 121 174

Colorado 112 s 71 183

Illinois 532 s 1,309 1,842

Indiana 123 s s 123

Kentucky Total 289 1 s 290

 Kentucky (East) 96 1 s 97

 Kentucky (West) 193 s s 193

Maryland 6 s s 6

Montana 14 s 166 181

New Mexico s s s s

Ohio 32 s s 32

Pennsylvania Total 123 s 751 875

 Pennsylvania (Anthracite) s s s s

 Pennsylvania (Bituminous) 123 s 751 874

Utah 46 s 93 140

Virginia 54 s 80 134

West Virginia Total 435 1 1,137 1,573

 West Virginia (Northern) 93 s 1,137 1,230

 West Virginia (Southern) 342 1 s 343

U.S. Total 1,820 2 3,728 5,550

- = No data reported.

s = Absolute percentage less than 0.05 or value is less than 0.5 of the table metric.

1 Mines that produce coal using shortwall, scoop loading, hand loading, or other methods.

Notes: Recoverable coal reserves at producing mines represent the quantity of coal that can be recovered (i.e. mined) from existing coal reserves at reporting mines. Excludes mines producing less than 25,000

short tons, which are not required to provide data and refuse recovery.

Sources: U.S. Energy Information Administration Form EIA-7A, 'Annual Survey of Coal Production and Preparation,' and U.S. Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration Form 7000-2, 'Quarterly

Mines Employment and Coal Production Report.'
http://www.epa.gov/ghgreporting/

For GHG Reporters Help Center

GHG Data Publication Tool

With EPA’s Facility Level Information on GreenHouse gases Tool

(FLIGHT), you can quickly and easily filter GHG data in a variety of

ways, including by facility, industry, location, or gas. Click the

map to launch the tool

2013 Summary

In 2013, power plants accounted for roughly onethird of total U.S. greenhouse gas pollution. Learn

more about what 2013 GHGRP data reveal about

U.S. GHG emissions.

EPA’s Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program will help us better understand where greenhouse gas emissions are coming from

and will improve our ability to make informed policy, business, and regulatory decisions.

Comprehensive greenhouse gas (GHG) data reported directly to EPA from

across the country are now easily accessible to the public through EPA’s GHG

Reporting Program (GHGRP). The 2013 GHGRP data set includes public

information from facilities in nine industry groups that directly emit large

quantities of GHGs, as well as suppliers of certain fossil fuels and industrial

gases.

Learn More »

Basic Information

For GHG Reporters

GHG Data

Help Center

Site Map

For GHG Reporters

If you are required to report emissions

under EPA’s Greenhouse Gas Reporting

Program, or you want to know more about

the requirements, visit the Reporting

Resources page.

What’s New

Comment period on subpart W

revisions extended

Final Rule on Global Warming

Potentials and Fluorinated Gas

Production

Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems

(Subpart W) rules

If you report to the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program, or you think you might

be required to, visit the For Reporters page for resources, tools, and training

opportunities.

1 2

Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program
Last updated on 7/30/2015

2013 GHGRP Data Now Available

Media Center

Final Rulemaking on Inputs To

Equations

Inputs Verifier Tool Sandbox

Climate Change Links

Climate Change Home

U.S. GHG Annual Inventory

Center for Corporate Climate

Leadership
No. 12-5517.

#### Evans *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8873 

To amend the Small Business Act to modify requirements relating to small 

business concerns owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 4, 2020 

Mr. HOLLINGSWORTH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Small Business, and in addition to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 

in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Small Business Act to modify requirements 

relating to small business concerns owned and controlled 

by service-disabled veterans, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Investing in Veteran 

5 Entrepreneurial Talents Act’’ or the ‘‘Investing in VETS 

6 Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8873 IH

1 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN GOVERNMENTWIDE GOAL FOR PAR2 TICIPATION IN FEDERAL CONTRACTS BY 

3 SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS OWNED AND 

4 CONTROLLED BY SERVICE-DISABLED VET5 ERANS. 

6 Section 15(g)(1)(A)(ii) of the Small Business Act is 

7 amended by striking ‘‘3 percent’’ and inserting ‘‘5 per8 cent’’. 

9 SEC. 3. CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENT FOR SMALL BUSI10 NESS CONCERNS OWNED AND CONTROLLED 

11 BY SERVICE-DISABLED VETERANS. 

12 (a) TITLE 38.—Paragraph (3) of section 8127(l) of 

13 title 38, United States Code, is amended to read as fol14 lows: 

15 ‘‘(3) The term ‘small business concern owned 

16 and controlled by veterans with service-connected 

17 disabilities’ means a small business concern owned 

18 and controlled by service-disabled veterans, as de19 fined under section 3(q)(2) of the Small Business 

20 Act (15 U.S.C. 632(q)(2)), that is certified by the 

21 Administrator of the Small Business Administra22 tion.’’. 

23 (b) SMALL BUSINESS ACT.—Section 36 of the Small 

24 Business Act (15 U.S.C. 657f) is amended— 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 8873 IH

1 (1) in subsection (a), by inserting ‘‘that is cer2 tified by the Administrator’’ after ‘‘service-disabled 

3 veterans’’; and 

4 (2) in subsection (b)— 

5 (A) by inserting ‘‘that is certified by the 

6 Administrator’’ before ‘‘if the contracting offi7 cer’’; and 

8 (B) by inserting ‘‘such’’ after ‘‘not less 

9 than 2’’. 

10 (c) PROHIBITION ON SELF-CERTIFICATION.—The 

11 Administrator of the Small Business Administration may 

12 not allow a small business concern (as defined under sec13 tion 3 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632)) to self14 certify as a small business concern owned and controlled 

15 by service-disabled veterans (as defined in such section). 

16 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICABILITY.—This section 

17 and the amendments made by this section— 

18 (1) shall take effect 3 years after the date of 

19 the enactment of this Act; and 

20 (2) shall apply to contracts entered into on or 

21 after such date. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-4320

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JOHN WESLEY FAIRCLOTH,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CR-95-72)

Submitted: January 15, 1998 Decided: January 27, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Wesley Faircloth, Appellant Pro Se. Christine Witcover Dean,

Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his

motion to stay forfeiture proceedings. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

United States v. Faircloth, No. CR-95-72 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 2, 1997).

Additionally, we deny the Appellee's motions to dismiss the appeal

and to stay the briefing schedule. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I,Anthony B. Waters, Chief Financial Officer of InnSuites Hospitality Trust (the“Company”), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1. The Annual Report onForm 10-K/A of the Company for the year ended January 31, 2004 (the “AnnualReport”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

2. The informationcontained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: May 4, 2005 | By:    | /s/    Anthony B. Waters |
|------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------|
|                   |   | Name: Anthony B. Waters                      |
|                   |   | Title: Chief Financial  Officer              |

 

----
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 24, 2016

a0516 

# Order

Clerk May 24, 2016

151897 & (15)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 151897

COA: 326896

Wayne CC: 13

- 002760

- FC

CHARLES EARL VARNADO, JR.,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 27, 2015 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H )(1), in lieu of

granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for

reconsideration of the defendant’s April 14, 2015 delayed application for leave to appeal

under the standard applicable to direct appeals. The defendant’s former ap pellate

attorney failed to timely file in the trial court a motion to withdraw as counsel, and failed

to file in the Court of Appeals, on direct review, a delayed application for leave to appeal

within the deadlines set forth in MCR 7.205(G)(3). According ly, the defendant was

deprived of his direct appeal as a result of constitutionally ineffective assistance of

counsel. See Roe v Flores

- Ortega , 528 US 470, 477; 120 S Ct 1209; 145 L Ed 2d 985

(2000); Peguero v United States , 526 US 23, 28; 119 S Ct 961; 1 43 L Ed 2d 18 (1999).

The motion to remand to the trial court is DENIED.

We do not retain jurisdiction.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 56 (Monday, March 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 13898]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-7354]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES


National Endowment for the Arts; Jazz Masters Advisory 
Teleconference

    Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that a meeting of 
the Fellowships Advisory Panel (Jazz Masters Section) to the National 
Council on the Arts will take place on April 11, 1997. The 
teleconference will convene from 2:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m. in Room 703, at 
the Nancy Hanks Center, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 
20506.
    This meeting is for the purpose of application evaluation, under 
the National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities Act of 1965, as 
amended, including discussion of information given in confidence to the 
Agency by grant applicants. In accordance with the determination of the 
Chairman of June 22, 1995, these sessions will be closed to the public 
pursuant to subsections (c) (4), (6) and (9)(B) of section 552b of 
Title 5, United States Code.
    Further information with reference to this meeting can be obtained 
from Ms. Kathy Plowitz-Worden, Panel Coordinator, National Endowment 
for the Arts, Washington, D.C. 20506, or call (202) 682-5691.

    Dated: March 19, 1997.
Kathy Plowitz-Worden,
Panel Coordinator, National Endowment for the Arts.
[FR Doc. 97-7354 Filed 3-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-M
Exhibit 23.1



                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
of Puget Sound Energy, Inc. (formerly Puget Sound Power & Light Company) on
Form S-3 (File Nos. 33-26818 and 333-41181) and Form S-8 (Nos. 33-27396, 333-
23393, 333-41113 and 333-41157) of our report, which includes an emphasis
paragraph related to the Company's merger with Washington Energy Company,
dated February 19, 1998, on our audits of the consolidated financial
statements and financial statement schedule of Puget Sound Energy, Inc.
as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and for the years ended December 31, 1997,
1996 and 1995, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

                            Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.

Seattle, Washington
March 25, 1998
F3C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

S

F F

F F

F F

F F

F F

H H

H H

O

O

OK+