alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarter report on Form 10-Q of National Housing Trust Limited Partnership (the Partnership) for the period ending March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, Susan E. Basting, Chief Financial Officer of NHT, Inc., general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |    |  |                                           
|----------------- |  | -- |  | ------------------------------------------
|Date May 17, 2004 |  | By |  | /s/ Susan E. Basting                      
|                  |  |    |  | Susan E. Basting, Treasurer               
|                  |  |    |  | and Chief Financial Officer               
|                  |  |    |  | NHT, Inc., General Partner for            
|                  |  |    |  | National Housing Trust Limited Partnership
IV 

House Calendar No. 8 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 131 

[Report No. 116–10] 

Providing for consideration of the conference report to accompany the joint 

resolution (H.J. Res. 31) making further continuing appropriations for 

the Department of Homeland Security for fiscal year 2019, and for 

other purposes, and providing for proceedings during the period from 

February 15, 2019, through February 22, 2019. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2019 

Mr. PERLMUTTER, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the conference report to accompany the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 31) making further continuing appropriations for the Department of 

Homeland Security for fiscal year 2019, and for other 

purposes, and providing for proceedings during the period from February 15, 2019, through February 22, 

2019. 

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it 

2 shall be in order to consider the conference report to acVerDate Sep 11 2014 20:08 Feb 14, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR131.RH HR131

pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 131 RH 

1 company the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 31) making fur2 ther continuing appropriations for the Department of 

3 Homeland Security for fiscal year 2019, and for other pur4 poses. All points of order against the conference report 

5 and against its consideration are waived. The conference 

6 report shall be considered as read. The previous question 

7 shall be considered as ordered on the conference report 

8 to its adoption without intervening motion except: (1) one 

9 hour of debate; and (2) one motion to recommit if applica10 ble. 

11 SEC. 2. On any legislative day during the period from 

12 February 15, 2019, through February 22, 2019— 

13 (a) the Journal of the proceedings of the pre14 vious day shall be considered as approved; and 

15 (b) the Chair may at any time declare the 

16 House adjourned to meet at a date and time, within 

17 the limits of clause 4, section 5, article I of the Con18 stitution, to be announced by the Chair in declaring 

19 the adjournment. 

20 SEC. 3. The Speaker may appoint Members to per21 form the duties of the Chair for the duration of the period 

22 addressed by section 2 of this resolution as though under 

23 clause 8(a) of rule I. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS

pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
House Calendar No. 8 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 131 

[Report No. 116–10] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the conference report 

2019, through February 22, 2019. proceedings during the period from February 15, 2019, and for other purposes, and providing for Department of Homeland Security for fiscal year making further continuing appropriations for the to accompany the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 31) 

FEBRUARY 14, 2019 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
## Re: Requested NMP Data El Christopher Lambesis to: wilburnr 09/22/2010 02:03 PM Cc: Ramaly.Todd, tzick, "Gary Wood"
Christopher Lambesis/R5/USEPAIUS <wilburnr@trimatrixlabs.com > Ramaly.Todd@epamail.epa.gov , tzick@cticompanies.com , "Gary Wood" <woodgl@trimatrixlabs.com>



### Rick, Thanks for this data. One last request, can you send me the same chromatogram and ion abundance scans for sample 1003151-03, peaks at RT 7.82 and RT 8.42 minutes? Thanks. -Chris

Christopher Lambesis Environmental Scientist U.S EPA Region 5 Land and Chemicals Division (312) 886-3583

"Rick Wilburn" Attached please find the requested NMP data 09/22/2010 12:46:06 PM

From: "Rick Wilburn" <wilburnr@trimatrixlabs.com > To: <tzick@cticompanies.com >, <Lambesis.Christopher@epamail.epa.gov>,

<Ramaly.Todd@epamail.epa.gov > Cc: "Gary Wood" <woodgl@trimatrixlabs.com> Date: 09/22/2010 12:46 PM Subject: Requested NMP Data



### Attached please find the requested NMP data.

Rick

Rick D. Wilburn Quality Assurance Manager

Corporate / Laboratory 5560 Corporate Exchange Court SE Grand Rapids, Michigan 49512 wilburnr@trimatrixlabs.com Main:616-975-4500 Direct:616-940-4246 Fax:616-942-7463
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

LINDA S. RESTREPO AND CARLOS E. 

RESTREPO d/b/a COLLECTIVELY RDI 

GLOBAL SERVICES AND R & D

INTERNATIONAL,

 Appellants,

v.

ALLIANCE RIGGERS & 

CONSTRUCTORS, LTD.,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§ 

No. 08-13-00007-CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 5

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2012-DCV04523) 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is before us on our own motion to determine if it should be dismissed for want 

of jurisdiction. Because there is no appealable order, we dismiss the appeal for want of 

jurisdiction.

Appellants, Linda S. Restrepo and Carlos E. Restrepo d/b/a Collectively RDI Global 

Services and R & D International, are attempting to appeal from an order denying their motion to 

dismiss the underlying suit for want of prosecution. On February 6, 2013, the Clerk of the Court 

notified Appellants that this order was not an appealable order and notified them of the Court’s 

intent to dismiss for want of jurisdiction unless, within ten days of the notice, a party responded 

showing grounds to continue the appeal. No response has been filed.
2

It is well settled that appellate courts have jurisdiction over final judgments, and such 

interlocutory orders as the Legislature deems appealable by statute. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 

39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001); Ruiz v. Ruiz, 946 S.W.2d 123, 124 (Tex.App.--El Paso 1997, no 

pet.); TEX.CIV.PRAC.&REM.CODE ANN. § 51.014 (West Supp. 2012)(authorizing appeals from 

certain interlocutory orders). An order denying a motion to dismiss a cause of action for want of 

prosecution is not a final judgment; it is an interlocutory order. See De Ayala v. Mackie, 193 

S.W.3d 575, 578 (Tex. 2006)(concluding that an order denying a motion to dismiss an entire 

proceeding for want of subject-matter jurisdiction is not a final judgment because it does not 

dispose of a claim that, if asserted independently, would be the proper subject of a lawsuit). 

Further, there is no statutory provision authorizing an appeal from the denial of a motion to dismiss 

for want of prosecution. Accordingly, the order at issue here is not appealable. We therefore 

dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX.R.APP.P. 42.3(a).

March 13, 2013

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-3127

KELLY S. JENNINGS,

Petitioner,

v.

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,

Respondent.

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board

in CB7521070026-T-1.

ON MOTION

Before LINN Circuit Judge.

ORDER

The court treats Kelly S. Jennings' petition for a writ of mandamus, submitted

within the context of this petition for review, as a motion for various relief. Jennings also

moves to vacate the decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board, to dismiss the

agency's charges, and to remand for further proceedings. The Social Security

Administration responds.

Jennings has not shown that this petition for review should be decided by motion

rather than by full briefing. A party seeking a writ of mandamus bears the burden of

proving that it has no other means of attaining the relief desired Mallard v. U.S. Dist. Court

for the Southern Dist. of Iowa 490 U.S. 296, 309 (1989), and that the right to issuance of

the writ is "clear and indisputable," Allied Chem. Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc., 449 U.S. 33, 35

(1980). Jennings has not shown that he cannot make his arguments concerning the
record or concerning vacatur and remand in his brief in this petition for review, and thus he

has not shown that he has no other means of attaining the relief desired. Jennings'

arguments concerning the merits of his case should be made in his brief.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motions are denied without prejudice to Jennings making any arguments in

his brief.

FOR THE COURT

APR 2 1 2009

is/ Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly

Clerk	FILED

Us. COURT OF APPEALS FOR

THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

cc:	Kelly S. Jennings

Austin M. Fulk, Esq.

s8

APR 2 1 2009

JwV ilOkbrui

CLERK

Date
T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N NO. 03-16-00194- CV In re K eith B. Wiley ORI GINAL P ROCEEDI NG F ROM TRAVIS CO UNTY M E M O R AN D U M O P I N I O N Relator’s pe tition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P . 52.8(a) .

__________________________________________ J eff Rose, Chief J ustice Be fore Chief J ustice Rose, Jus tices Pemberton a nd Bour land Filed: Apr il 6, 2016
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 09078**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  09078\09078_Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement x 09078\09078_Checklist_111010_version34.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

09078\09078_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 09078\09078_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 09078\09078_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09078\09078_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09078\09078_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09078\Supporting Documentation\09078_Aerial Map.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

09078\Supporting Documentation\09078_EPA Cover Letter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09078\Supporting Documentation\09078_Water Balance Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

09078\09078_Cover Letter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
No. 12-5532.

#### Shareef, aka Karim, aka Sherif *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 49 (Thursday, March 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 11865]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6332]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

Applications for Consolidated Hearing

    1. The Commission has before it the following mutually exclusive 
applications for new noncommercial, educational FM construction 
permits:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                       MM Docket
               Applicant                         City/State                      File No.                 No.   
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A. Pataphysical Broadcasting Foundation  San Ardo, California.....  BPED-940316MB....................      97-79
B. Central Coast Educational             King City, California....  BPED-940606MB....................      97-79
 Broadcasters.                                                                                                  
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    2. Pursuant to Section 309(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as 
amended, the above applications have been designated for hearing in a 
consolidated proceeding upon the issues whose headings are set forth 
below. The text of each of the issues has been standardized and is set 
forth in its entirety under the corresponding heading at 51 Fed. Reg. 
19347, May 29, 1986. The letters shown before each applicant's name 
above are used below to signify the issue in question applicable to 
that particular applicant.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Issue heading                         Applicant(s)       
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Financial...............................  A                          
2. 307(b)--Noncommercial Educational FM....  A, B                       
3. Ultimate................................  A, B                       
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    3. If there are any non-standardized issues in this proceeding, the 
full text of the issue and the applicant(s) to which it applies are set 
forth in an Appendix to this Notice. A copy of the complete HDO in this 
proceeding is available for inspection and copying during normal 
business hours in the FCC Dockets Branch (Room 230), 1919 M Street, 
N.W., Washington, D.C. The complete text may also be purchased from the 
Commission's duplicating contractor, International Transcription 
Service, Inc., 2100 M Street, N.W., Suite 140, Washington, D.C. 20037, 
telephone (202) 857-3800.
Linda B. Blair,
Chief, Audio Services Division, Mass Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 97-6332 Filed 3-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                               
<ARTICLE>                                           5
<MULTIPLIER>                                                     1000
                                                     
<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                      JUN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                        FEB-28-1999
<CASH>                                                          12560
<SECURITIES>                                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                   46824
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     2332
<INVENTORY>                                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                60962
<PP&E>                                                          26973
<DEPRECIATION>                                                  21289
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                  78122
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                           26794
<BONDS>                                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                         0
<COMMON>                                                           49
<OTHER-SE>                                                      49950
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                    78122
<SALES>                                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                               121466
<CGS>                                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                   40693
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                78454
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                 22
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                  2668
<INCOME-TAX>                                                    1,123
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                              1566
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                                     1566
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                    0.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    0.32
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| Date:                May 1, 2006 | By:    | /s/   James                F. Wirth |   |
|----------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                             |   | Name:                James F. Wirth                |
|                             |   | Title:                Chief Executive Officer      |
No. 12-5664.

#### McArty *v.*Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction.

Sup. Ct. Ark. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2


                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) and
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


     In  connection  with the  filing  by Malex,  Inc.  (the  "Company")  of the
Quarterly  Report on Form  10-QSB for the period  ending  January 31, 2004  (the
"Report"), I, Danny Wettreich,  Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
               and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               operation of the Company.




                                               /s/ Danny Wettreich
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Danny Wettreich
                                               Chief Financial Officer


Dated:  March 15, 2004
#### IN RE: CONDEMNATION OF 552 LAWN DRIVE, LUCINDA, PA

879 CD 2017

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

10/03/2017

Clarion County Civil Division, No. 2017-00115

Quashed
Exhibit
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of China Wind Systems, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Jianhua Wu, chief
executive officer of the Company, and Teresa Zhang, chief financial officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
      May 14, 2010
              By:
              /s/ Jianhua WuJianhua
      Wu
                Chief
      Executive Officer





Date:
      May 14, 2010
              By:
              /s/ Teresa ZhangTeresa
      Zhang
                Chief
      Financial Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 7 (Friday, January 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1488-1489]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-625]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
[STB Finance Docket No. 33331]

Respondek Railroad Corporation; Acquisition and Operation 
Exemption; Evansville Terminal Company

    Respondek Railroad Corporation (Respondek), a noncarrier, has filed 
a verified notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.31 to acquire and 
operate approximately 17.7 miles of line owned by the Evansville 
Terminal Company (Evansville): (1) Between milepost 227.5

[[Page 1489]]

at Poseyville, IN, and milepost 244.7 at Evansville, IN; and (2) 
between milepost B-204.3 and milepost B-205 at Browns, IL.
    The transaction was expected to be consummated on or after the 
December 30, 1996 effective date of the exemption.
    If the verified notice contains false or misleading information, 
the exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to reopen the proceeding to 
revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. 
The filing of a petition to reopen will not automatically stay the 
transaction.
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 33331, must be filed with the Office of the 
Secretary, Surface Transportation Board, Case Control Branch, 1201 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20423. In addition, a copy of 
each pleading must be served on Andrew P. Goldstein, Esq., McCarthy, 
Sweeney & Harkaway, P.C., Suite 1105, 1750 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20006.

    Decided: January 3, 1997.

    By the board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-625 Filed 1-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
```
# t14p01p1