alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Holdings, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 333-58386 and 333-92489) on Form S-3 and (Nos. 333-59690, 333-80595,
333-80597 and 333-83891) on Form S-8 of R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Holdings, Inc. of
our report dated January 28, 2003, except as to note 14, which is as of February
14, 2003, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of R.J. Reynolds
Tobacco Holdings, Inc. as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related
consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity and comprehensive
income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2002, which report appears in the December 31, 2002, annual report
on Form 10-K of R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Holdings, Inc. Our report refers to the
adoption of the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets."


/s/ KPMG LLP

Greensboro, North Carolina
March 3, 2003
# X14 - Percent of HH with Veh
Exhibit 31.1  I, Dempsey Mork, certify that:  1.           I have reviewed this quarterly report for the period ended June 30, 2009 on Form 10-Q of Knickerbocker Capital Corp.;  2.           Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.           Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.           The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a)           Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b)           Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c)           Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.           The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)           All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b)           Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  Nov. 19, 2009  /s/ Dempsey Mork Dempsey Mork Chief Executive Officer
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-10-00495-CV

In the Interest of R. A. Q.

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

NO. 09-3302-FC1, HONORABLE GEORGE E. HOLMES, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant John Mark Quaak and appellee the Office of the Attorney General have

both filed motions to dismiss. Quaak contends that the entire cause should be dismissed because the

OAG lacks standing to bring this case. We deny Quaak’s motion. The OAG contends that this

appeal should be dismissed because Quaak on May 23, 2010, timely requested de novo review of the

associate judge’s order, preventing the order from being final and appealable. We grant the OAG’s

motion and dismiss this appeal. The cause may proceed at the trial court level.

 

J. Woodfin Jones, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Puryear and Pemberton

Dismissed on Appellee’s Motion

Filed: December 15, 2010
Exhibit 24



POWER OF ATTORNEY



FORM 10-K



KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of the undersigned Directors of Roanoke Electric Steel Corporation, , a Virginia corporation, hereby
constitute and appoint T. Joe Crawford, Mark G. Meikle, and William M. Watson, Jr., or any of them, with full power to each of them to act alone, my true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, for me on my behalf and in my name, place and stead,
to execute and file the Annual Report on Form 10-K for Roanoke Electric Steel Corporation for its fiscal year ended October 31, 2005, and any amendment which such attorney- or attorneys-in-fact may deem appropriate or necessary.



Dated: December 20, 2005



|                             |  |  |  |                        
|---------------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|/s/ George B. Cartledge, Jr. |  |  |  | /s/ Thomas L. Robertson
|                             |  | 
|/s/ T. Joe Crawford          |  |  |  | /s/ Donald G. Smith    
|                             |  | 
|/s/ Timothy R. Duke          |  |  |  | /s/ Charles W. Steger  
|                             |  | 
|/s/ George W. Logan          |  |  |  | /s/ Joseph H. Vipperman
|                             |  | 
|/s/ Charles I. Lunsford, II  |  |  |  |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          15,157
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   93,457
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,190
<INVENTORY>                                     13,304
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               132,812
<PP&E>                                       1,092,391
<DEPRECIATION>                                 395,292
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 864,430
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          115,900
<BONDS>                                        150,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           358
<OTHER-SE>                                     452,283
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   864,430
<SALES>                                        177,697
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               182,920
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   39,234
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                98,440
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,069
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 22,770
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,448
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,322
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,322
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .31
        

</TABLE>
# Data for Table A7

# RSEs for Table A7
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.17


                     ALLONGE TO SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED
                             SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE


         This Allonge is attached to and made an integral part of that certain
Second Amended and Restated Secured Promissory Note (the "Note") dated July 12,
2001, in the original principal amount of $4,000,000 from GALAXY NUTRITIONAL
FOODS, INC., f/k/a Galaxy Foods Company, a Delaware corporation ("Maker"), in
favor of FINOVA Mezzanine Capital, Inc. ("Holder"). All terms used herein with
initial capital letters, to the extent not otherwise defined herein, shall have
the meanings given such terms in the Note. This Allonge is executed in
conjunction with that certain waiver letter effective as of the date hereof, by
and between Maker and Holder.

         The first paragraph of the Note is hereby amended and restated, in its
entirety, to read as follows:

                  FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, GALAXY FOODS COMPANY, a
         Delaware corporation ("Maker"), promises to pay to the order of FINOVA
         MEZZANINE CAPITAL, INC., a Tennessee corporation ("Payee"; Payee and
         any subsequent holder[s] hereof are hereinafter referred to
         collectively as "Holder"), at the office of Payee at FINOVA Mezzanine
         Capital, Inc., Suite 200, 500 Church Street, Nashville, Tennessee
         37219, or at such other place as Holder may designate to Maker in
         writing from time to time, the principal sum of FOUR MILLION AND NO/100
         DOLLARS ($4,000,000), together with interest on the outstanding
         principal balance hereof from the date hereof at the rate of fifteen
         and one-half percent (15.5%) per annum (computed on the basis of a
         360-day year).

         Except as specifically provided herein, all terms and provisions of the
Note shall remain in full force and effect, and are hereby ratified and affirmed
by Maker.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Maker has executed this Allonge effective as of
February 13, 2002, for attachment to the Note.

                                       GALAXY NUTRITIONAL FOODS, INC.,
                                       f/k/a Galaxy Foods Company, a Delaware
                                       corporation



                                       By:
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          Name:
                                          Title:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 11 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 11

  Providing the sense of the House of Representatives that the House 
  should not adjourn until the annual appropriation bills within the 
       jurisdiction of all the subcommittees of the Committee on 
    Appropriations for the current fiscal year are enacted into law.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2019

Mr. McCarthy submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Providing the sense of the House of Representatives that the House 
  should not adjourn until the annual appropriation bills within the 
       jurisdiction of all the subcommittees of the Committee on 
    Appropriations for the current fiscal year are enacted into law.

    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
the House should not adjourn until the annual appropriation bills 
within the jurisdiction of all the subcommittees of the Committee on 
Appropriations for the current fiscal year are enacted into law.
                                 <all>
```
No. 12-5328.

#### Hand *v.*Director, Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs, Department of Labor.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 12-5208.

#### Goree *v.*Mississippi.

Sup. Ct. Miss. Certio-rari denied.
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 111 

Recognizing June 6, 2009, as the 70th anniversary of the tragic date when 

the M.S. St. Louis, a ship carrying Jewish refugees from Nazi Germany, 

returned to Europe after its passengers were refused admittance to 

the United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 23, 2009 

Mr. KOHL (for himself and Mr. VOINOVICH) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing June 6, 2009, as the 70th anniversary of the 

tragic date when the M.S. St. Louis, a ship carrying 

Jewish refugees from Nazi Germany, returned to Europe 

after its passengers were refused admittance to the 

United States. 

Whereas on May 13, 1939, the ocean liner M.S. St. Louis departed from Hamburg, Germany for Havana, Cuba with 

937 passengers, most of whom were Jewish refugees fleeing Nazi persecution; 

Whereas the Nazi regime in Germany in the 1930s implemented a program of violent persecution of Jews; 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 111 IS 

Whereas the Kristallnacht, or Night of Broken Glass, pogrom 

of November 9 through 10, 1938, signaled an increase in 

violent anti-Semitism; 

Whereas after the Cuban Government, on May 27, 1939, refused entry to all except 28 passengers on board the M.S. 

St. Louis, the M.S. St. Louis proceeded to the coast of 

south Florida in hopes that the United States would accept the refugees; 

Whereas the United States refused to allow the M.S. St. 

Louis to dock and thereby provide a haven for the Jewish 

refugees; 

Whereas the Immigration Act of 1924 placed strict limits on 

immigration; 

Whereas a United States Coast Guard cutter patrolled near 

the M.S. St. Louis to prevent any passengers from jumping to freedom; 

Whereas following denial of admittance of the passengers to 

Cuba, the United States, and Canada, the M.S. St. Louis 

set sail on June 6, 1939, for return to Antwerp, Belgium 

with the refugees; and 

Whereas 254 former passengers of the M.S. St. Louis died 

under Nazi rule: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes that June 6, 2009, marks the 

3 70th anniversary of the tragic date when the M.S. 

4 St. Louis returned to Europe after its passengers 

5 were refused admittance to the United States and 

6 other countries in the Western Hemisphere; 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
3 

•SRES 111 IS 

1 (2) honors the memory of the 937 refugees 

2 aboard the M.S. St. Louis, most of whom were Jews 

3 fleeing Nazi oppression, and 254 of whom subse4 quently died during the Holocaust; 

5 (3) acknowledges the suffering of those refugees 

6 caused by the refusal of the United States, Cuban, 

7 and Canadian governments to provide them political 

8 asylum; and 

9 (4) recognizes the 70th anniversary of the M.S. 

10 St. Louis tragedy as an opportunity for public offi11 cials and educators to raise awareness about an im12 portant historical event, the lessons of which are rel13 evant to current and future generations. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
# C_2022380EN.01001402.xml

| 3.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 380/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 380/14

---

Action brought on 29 June 2022 — DZ Bank v SRB

(Case T-403/22)

(2022/C 380/17)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: DZ Bank AG Deutsche Zentral-Genossenschaftsbank, Frankfurt am Main (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: H. Berger and W. Weber, lawyers)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board (SRB)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the Single Resolution Board of 11 April 2022 on the calculation of the 2022 ex ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRB/ES/2022/18), including the annexes thereto, in so far as the contested decision, including Annex I, Annex II and Annex III thereto, concerns the applicant’s contribution; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Single Resolution Board of 11 April 2022 on the calculation of the 2022 ex ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRB/ES/2022/18), including the annexes thereto, in so far as the contested decision, including Annex I, Annex II and Annex III thereto, concerns the applicant’s contribution;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

In the alternative, in the event that the Court takes the view that the contested decision is legally non-existent as a result of the use of the incorrect official language by the defendant and the action for annulment is therefore inadmissible on the ground that it is devoid of purpose, the applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare that the contested decision is legally non-existent; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that the contested decision is legally non-existent;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant relies on nine pleas in law which are essentially identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-396/22 Landesbank Baden-Württemberg v SRB.

---
**Exhibit 21.1**

**Subsidiaries of Registrant**

Symmetricom, Ltd. 

Symmetricom Puerto Rico Ltd. 

Manufacturing Solutions Puerto Rico, Inc. (in liquidation) 

Symmetricom Hong Kong, Ltd. (in liquidation) 

Symmetricom GlobalServices, Inc. 

Symmetricom GmbH 

Symmetricom LLC

Symmcom Beijing Trading Company, Ltd 

TelecomSolutions, Inc. (inactive) 

Analog Solutions, Inc. (inactive) 

TrueTime, Inc. (inactive) 

Timing Solutions Corporation (in liquidation) 

QoSmetrics, Inc. (in liquidation) 

QoSmetrics, S.A (in liquidation) 

Timing Application Inc. (in liquidation)
Exhibit 10.39


 


Void Confirmation of Second Supplemental Agreement
for Advertising Space Leasing Agreement


 


Party A (Lessor): Shenzhen Kezhi
Technology Co., Ltd.(“Kezhi”)


 


Number of Business License: 91440300MA5G10WT71


 


Party B (Lessee): Shenzhen Honghao
Internet Technology Co. Ltd. (“Honghao”)


 


Number of Business License: 91440300MA5GANXX8H


 


Regarding the Second Supplemental
Agreement for Advertising Space Leasing Agreement attached hereto(“Second Supplemental Agreement”) executed by Party
A and Party B on March 30, 2021, both parties hereby reach an agreement that the Second Supplemental Agreement is void, and it is not
binding on both parties from the beginning of the execution. Neither party may claim any rights to the other party in relation to the
Second Supplemental Agreement.


 


Party A and Party B further confirm
that, once the Second Supplemental Agreement is void, both parties will re-execute a Second Supplemental Agreement for Advertising Space
Leasing Agreement to replace the original Second Supplemental Agreement.


 


This Void Confirmation is made
in two original copies and held by Party A and Party B.


 


Party A: Shenzhen Kezhi Technology Co., Ltd. (Stamp)


 


Party B: Shenzhen Honghao Internet Technology Co.
Ltd. (Stamp)


 


Date: May 12, 2021
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit

No. 98-60256

OSCAR CAMACHO-MARROQUIN, also known as Jesus Sanchez, Petitioner,
VERSUS IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

July 11, 2000 Before DUHÉ, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
ORDER: Petitioner-Appellant has moved to wi thdraw his Petition for Rehearing En Banc “so that the Immigration and Naturalization Service may proceed with his deportation in lieu of incarceration.” Accordingly, in order to bring all matters relating to PetitionerAppellant before this court to an end so that the INS may proceed with his deportation as he requests:
IT IS ORDERED that Peti tioner-Appellant’s motion is granted and: The opinion of the panel in this matter filed on September 29,2

1999 is hereby WITHDRAWN.

The Petition for Rehearing En Banc and the Petition for Review filed in this matter are DISMISSED, and
T he Stay of Deportation previously issued in this matter is
LIFTED.
U.S. Energy Information Administration Quarterly Coal Report, October - December 2023

Table 31. Average price of coal receipts at commercial and institutional users by census division and state

(dollars per short ton)

Year to date

Census division

and state

October - December

2023

July - September

2023

October - December

2022 2023 2022

Percent

change

Middle Atlantic w - w w w w

Pennsylvania w - w w w w

East North Central 67.68 49.62 61.50 63.33 59.64 6.2

Illinois w w w w w w

Indiana w w w w w w

West North Central w w 88.24 w w w

Iowa w w w w 91.66 w

Minnesota - - w 98.50 w w

Missouri w - w w w w

North Dakota w w w w w w

South Atlantic w w w w w w

North Carolina w w w w w w

Virginia w w w w w w

East South Central - - - - 103.57 -

Kentucky - - - - 103.57 -

Mountain w w w w w w

Colorado w - - w - -

Montana - w w w w w

Wyoming w - w w w w

Pacific w w 89.79 w w w

Alaska w w 89.79 w w w

U.S. Total 100.15 92.48 100.50 95.76 89.85 6.6

- = No data reported.

w = Data withheld to avoid disclosure.

Note: Average price is based on the cost, insurance, and freight (c.i.f. value). Total may not equal sum of components because of independent rounding.

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), Form EIA-3, 'Quarterly Survey of Industrial, Commercial & Institutional Coal Users.'