alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 57 (Tuesday, March 25, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 14180]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-7515]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

State of Ohio; Declaration of Disaster #2934; Amendment #2

    In accordance with a notice from the Federal Emergency Management 
Agency, dated March 17, 1997, the above-numbered Declaration is hereby 
amended to establish the incident period for this disaster as beginning 
on February 28, 1997 and continuing through March 17, 1997.
    All other information remains the same, i.e., the termination date 
for filing applications for physical damage is May 3, 1997, and for 
loans for economic injury the deadline is December 4, 1997.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008.)

    Dated: March 18, 1997.
Bernard Kulik,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 97-7515 Filed 3-24-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
# C_2022368EN.01002104.xml

| 26.9.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 368/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.9.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 368/21

---

Order of the President of the Court of 20 May 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Frankfurt am Main — Germany) — flightright GmbH v Swiss International Air Lines AG

(Case C-131/22) (1)

(2022/C 368/39)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 191, 10.5.2022.

---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 57 (Tuesday, March 25, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 14130]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-7425]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-290-000]


Colorado Interstate Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

March 19, 1997.
    Take notice that on March 14, 1997, Colorado Interstate Gas Company 
(CIG), tendered for filing to become part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First 
Revised Volume No. 1, the tariff sheets listed on Appendix A to the 
filing, to be effective April 14, 1997.
    CIG states on November 1, 1996 it filed in Docket No. RP97-63-000 
pro forma tariff sheets to comply with Order No. 587. As part of CIG's 
filing it proposed a new Headstation Pooling Rate Schedule (HPS-1). CIG 
further states in the Commission's order on CIG's compliance filing 
issued January 16, 1997, the Commission stated that the GISB standards 
``intended the pipeline to implement a new pooling service but in order 
to implement a new service the pipeline must make a section 4 filing'' 
(that is a filing pursuant to Section 4 of the Natural Gas Act). CIG 
states this is the purpose of this filing.
    CIG states that copies of this filing have been served on CIG's 
jurisdictional customers and public bodies.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Section 385.214 and Section 385.211 of the Commission's 
Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as provided in 
Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be 
consider by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be 
taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-7425 Filed 3-24-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      Section #1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (“Form 10-Q”) of Galaxy
      Nutritional Foods, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended September 30,
      2007
      as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I,
      Salvatore J. Furnari, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
      Form
      10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


/s/ Salvatore
              J. FurnariSalvatore
              J. FurnariChief Financial Officer
              November 14,
                2007
Table 1. Average Transportation and Delivered Costs of Coal, By Year and Primary Transport Mode

(nominal dollars per ton)

Year

Average Transportation Cost of Coal

(Dollars per Ton)

Average Delivered Cost of Coal

(Dollars per Ton)

Transportation Cost Share of Delivered Cost

(Percent)

Railroad2008 17.11 41.63 41.1%2009 16.16 44.06 36.7%2010 17.61 45.17 39.0%2011 19.63 47.84 41.0%2012 20.30 47.37 42.9%2013 20.93 45.58 45.9%2014 21.24 45.85 46.3%2015 20.16 42.46 47.5%2016 19.37 40.84 47.4%2017 19.77 39.60 49.9%2018 20.01 39.67 50.4%2019 19.10 38.53 49.6%2020 17.11 35.38 48.4%2021 19.15 37.06 51.7%2022 22.08 45.16 48.9%Waterway2008 6.63 51.98 12.8%2009 6.23 57.84 10.8%2010 6.39 56.42 11.3%2011 6.37 58.39 10.9%2012 5.61 58.57 9.6%2013 5.68 56.74 10.0%2014 5.96 57.07 10.4%2015 5.14 54.67 9.4%2016 4.79 51.54 9.3%2017 4.54 47.82 9.5%2018 4.67 46.80 10.0%2019 4.50 47.37 9.5%2020 4.81 46.90 10.3%2021 5.37 45.40 11.8%

2022 7.24 57.78 12.5%
Table 1. Average Transportation and Delivered Costs of Coal, By Year and Primary Transport Mode

(nominal dollars per ton)

Year

Average Transportation Cost of Coal

(Dollars per Ton)

Average Delivered Cost of Coal

(Dollars per Ton)

Transportation Cost Share of Delivered Cost

(Percent)

Truck2008 6.20 40.02 15.5%2009 5.01 38.52 13.0%2010 5.88 43.11 13.6%2011 5.42 47.33 11.5%2012 5.99 50.80 11.8%2013 6.36 47.84 13.3%2014 6.20 49.42 12.5%2015 5.92 46.12 12.8%2016 5.55 36.76 15.1%2017 6.10 36.56 16.7%2018 6.90 36.88 18.7%2019 5.78 36.89 15.7%2020 5.49 34.92 15.7%2021 6.74 36.33 18.6%2022 8.47 40.66 20.8%US Total[1]2008 15.11 42.21 35.8%2009 14.14 45.00 31.4%2010 15.27 46.05 33.2%2011 16.97 48.67 34.9%2012 17.19 48.51 35.4%2013 17.64 46.89 37.6%2014 18.53 47.73 38.8%2015 17.15 44.08 38.9%2016 16.19 42.18 38.4%2017 16.35 39.95 40.9%2018 16.45 39.85 41.3%2019 15.69 39.06 40.2%2020 13.96 36.30 38.5%2021 15.92 37.61 42.3%2022 18.69 45.78 40.8%Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Form EIA‐923, "Power Plant Operations Report."

W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.

1 Includes a small number of shipments in categories other than railroad, waterway or truck.

Notes: Rates are based on a weighted average of the difference between the commodity cost and total delivered cost of coal shipments to plants in the electric power sector. In addition, the ra

are based on the primary transport mode selected by a plant's owner or operator so may include other secondary or tertiary modes. Values are presented in nominal dollars. For the compositi

of coal basins, refer to the definition of "coal‐producing regions" in EIA's glossary at www.eia.gov/tools/glossary.
No. 12-5103.

#### Streu *v.*Dormire, Superintendent, Jefferson City Correctional Center.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 12-25.

#### Maracich et al. *v.*Spears et al.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari granted.
# t13p01p1
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

Nova Mud, Inc., 

 

 Appellant,

v.

Sandra H. Staley, Individually as 

Independent Executrix of the Estate of 

George G. Staley, Deceased, and as 

Trustee of the Tax Free Trust for Sandra 

H. Staley,

 Appellees.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-17-00147-CV

Appeal from the

109th District Court

of Winkler County, Texas 

(TC# 15,683-B)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the District Clerk’s request for an extension of time within which to 

file the Clerk’s Record until December 20, 2017. NO FURTHER REQUESTS FOR EXTENSION 

OF TIME TO FILE THE CLERK’S RECORD WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that Sherry Terry, District Clerk, for Winkler County, Texas 

prepare the Clerk’s Record, and forward the same to this Court on or before December 20, 2017.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 20th day of November, 2017.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
# t20p01p1
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 March 21, 2014

d0319

Order 

Clerk

March 21, 2014

147335(52)

HAROLD HUNTER, JR.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 147335

COA: 306018

Genesee CC: 10-094081-NI

DAVID SISCO and AUTO CLUB INSURANCE

ASSOCIATION,

Defendants,

and 

CITY OF FLINT TRANSPORTATION

DEPARTMENT,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s November 

20, 2013 order is considered, and it is GRANTED. We VACATE that part of our 

November 20, 2013 order that denied the plaintiff’s application for leave to appeal. On 

reconsideration, the application for leave to appeal the April 2, 2013 judgment of the 

Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED, limited to whether damages for 

pain and suffering and/or emotional distress may qualify as a “bodily injury” that permits 

a plaintiff to avoid the application of governmental immunity from tort liability under the 

motor vehicle exception to governmental immunity, MCL 691.1405 (see Wesche v 

Mecosta Co Rd Comm, 480 Mich 75 (2008)). 

We direct the Clerk to schedule the oral argument in this case for the same future 

session of this Court when it will hear oral argument in Hannay v Dept of Transportation 

(Docket No. 146763).

The Michigan Association for Justice, the Michigan Defense Trial Counsel, Inc., 

and the Insurance Institute of Michigan are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other 

persons or groups interested in the determination of the issue presented in this case may 

move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.
| (1)   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  DATE:      November 14, 2008 |  /s/ James E. Rouse                       |
|------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|
|                               | James      E. Rouse                            |
|                               | President      andChief      Executive Officer |

----

----
No. 12-5086.

#### Thompson *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-10727.

#### Neal *v.*Florida.

Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.
IN THE NINTH COURT OF APPEALS

_____________________ _____

09-16-00303-CR

09-16-00307-CR

__________________________

_________________________________________________________________ 

On Appeal from the

221st District Court of Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause Nos. 16-07-08241-CR and 16-07-08240-CR

_________________________________________________________________ 

JUDGMENT

THE NINTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered these causes

on appeal, concludes that the judgments of the trial court should be affirmed. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, in accordance with the Court’s opinion, 

that the judgments of the trial court are affirmed.

Opinion of the Court delivered by Justice Charles Kreger

May 16, 2018

AFFIRMED

**********

Copies of this judgment and the Court’s opinion are certified for 

observance.

Carol Anne Harley

Clerk of the Court

Robert Cor'Darius Taylor

v.

The State of Texas
# tes1p01p1
#### CLYDE MEIKLE *v.*COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

(AC 34575)

Gruendel, Bear and Foti, Js.

Argued September 27

officially released October 15, 2013

Per Curiam.

The appeal is dismissed.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Jill M. Broadfoot, the Chief Financial Officer of Vical Incorporated (the Company), hereby certifies that, to the best of her knowledge:



| | 1. | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the Periodic
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by
the Periodic Report and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Periodic Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|Dated: May 6, 2011     
|                       
|/s/ JILL M. BROADFOOT  
|Jill M. Broadfoot      
|Chief Financial Officer

THIS CERTIFICATION
ACCOMPANIES THE FORM 10-Q TO WHICH IT RELATES, IS NOT DEEMED FILED WITH THE SEC AND IS NOT TO BE INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO ANY FILING OF THE COMPANY UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, OR THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934, AS AMENDED (WHETHER MADE BEFORE OR AFTER THE DATE OF THE FORM 10-Q), IRRESPECTIVE OF ANY GENERAL INCORPORATION LANGUAGE CONTAINED IN SUCH FILING. A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS CERTIFICATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE COMPANY AND WILL BE
RETAINED BY THE COMPANY AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors and Stockholders of
    REFAC OPTICAL GROUP

We have issued our report dated March 17, 2006, accompanying the financial
statements included in the Annual Report of Refac Optical Group (formerly Refac)
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements on Form
S-4 (File No. 333-130328, effective February 14, 2006) and Forms S-8 (File Nos.
333-76085, effective April 16, 1999, and 333-107146, effective September 5,
2003).

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

New York, New York
March 17, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          23,670
<SECURITIES>                                    11,881
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,969
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (399)
<INVENTORY>                                      2,455
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                54,822
<PP&E>                                          14,790
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,875
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  75,621
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,732
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             7
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      63,053
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    63,060
<SALES>                                         10,720
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,810
<CGS>                                            2,910
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,127
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    23
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (92)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,117
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,637
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,117
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,480
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.32
        

</TABLE>
No. 109,512

#### In the Matter of Susan L. Bowman, *Petitioner.*

(361 P.3d 514)

On October 18, 2013, this court suspended the petitioner, Susan L. Bowman, from the practice of law in Kansas for a period of 12 months. See *In re Bowman,*298 Kan. 231, 310 P. 3d 1054 (2013). The court further ordered that the petitioner undergo a hearing, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 219 (2015 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 403), prior to consideration of a petition for reinstatement.

On January 21,2015, petitioner filed a motion for reinstatement. On April 28, 2015, the court referred the petition to the Disciplin-aiy Administrator for investigation and hearing. On August 13, 2015, a hearing panel of the Kansas Board for Discipline of Attorneys conducted a hearing to consider the petitioners petition for reinstatement.

On August 18,2015, the hearing panel filed its report setting out the circumstances leading to the petitioners suspension, a summary of the evidence presented, and its findings and recommendations. The panel unanimously recommended that the petitioners petition for reinstatement of her license to practice law in Kansas-be granted, subject to certain terms and conditions detailed in the report.

The court, after carefully considering the record, accepts the findings and recommendations of the hearing panel and grants the petitioners petition for reinstatement of her license to practice law in Kansas, subject to compliance with the terms and conditions detailed in the hearing panels report.

It Is Therefore Ordered that die petitioner be reinstated to the practice of law in Kansas conditioned upon her compliance with the annual continuing legal education requirements and upon her payment of all fees required by the Clerk of the Appellate Courts and the Kansas Continuing Legal Education Commission and subject to the terms and conditions detailed in the hearing panel’s report. Upon proof provided to the Clerk of the Appellate *382Courts that the petitioner has complied with the annual continuing legal education requirements and has paid the fees required by the Clerk of the Appellate Courts and the Kansas Continuing Legal Education Commission, the Clerk is directed to enter the petitioners name upon the roster of attorneys engaged in the practice of law in Kansas.

Effective this 24th day of November, 2015.

It Is Further Ordered that this order be published in the official Kansas Reports and that the costs herein be assessed to the petitioner.

It Is So Ordered.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000819577
<NAME> AEI REAL ESTATE FUND XVII LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         496,928
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,967
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               499,895
<PP&E>                                      16,103,871
<DEPRECIATION>                             (3,430,768)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,172,998
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          405,705
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,767,293
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,172,998
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               921,655
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  350,648
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                571,007
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            571,007
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   571,007
<EPS-BASIC>                                      26.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    26.31



</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 
EXHIBIT 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT AND REPORT ON SCHEDULE

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 33-
38384, 33-3456, 33-11317, 2-70291, 33-56042, 33-57163, 333-00333, 333-21815, and
333-47369 on Form S-8 of our report dated July 22, 1998 (September 3, 1998 as to
the last sentence of Note I), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Symmetricom, Inc. for the year ended June 30, 1998.

Our audits of the consolidated financial statements referred to in our
aforementioned report also included the consolidated financial statement
schedule of Symmetricom, Inc., listed in Item 14(a)2.  This financial statement
schedule is the responsibility of the Company's management.  Our responsibility
is to express an opinion based on our audits.  In our opinion, such financial
statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial
statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the
information set forth therein.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
---------------------------------------
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

San Jose, California
September 21, 1998