alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Provident Bankshares
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Dennis A.
Starliper, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
             15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
             material respects, the financial condition and results of
             operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the
             Report.


                                        /s/ Dennis A. Starliper
                                        -----------------------------
                                        Dennis A. Starliper
                                        Chief Financial Officer

August 9, 2005
No. 12-5206.

#### Fox *v.*Drew, Warden.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. §1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1)   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                            |                                                          |                             |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|         Date: May              16, 2007 |                                                               | /s/               James E. Rouse |
|                                                                                 | James E. Rouse                                                     |
|                                                                                 | President                andChief                Executive Officer |

*A      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been      provided to Arrhythmia Research Technology, Inc. and will be retained by      Arrhythmia Research Technology, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*
# C_2022158EN.01001301.xml

| 11.4.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 158/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.4.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 158/13

---

Action brought on 28 February 2022 — Schneider v EUIPO — Frutaria Comercial de Frutas y Hortalizas (frutania)

(Case T-109/22)

(2022/C 158/16)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Markus Schneider (Bonn, Germany) (represented by: M. Bergermann and D. Graetsch, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Frutaria Comercial de Frutas y Hortalizas, SL (Zaragoza, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: Application for EU figurative mark frutania in blue — Application for registration No 11 987 419

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 17 December 2021 in Case R 1058/2017-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs, including those incurred in the appeal proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs, including those incurred in the appeal proceedings.

Plea in law

| — | incorrect application and interpretation of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

incorrect application and interpretation of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
No. 12-5308.

#### Godfrey *v.*Texas.

Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Cer-tiorari denied.
#### IN RE: Andrew J. REDER, Debtor, Andrew Reder Appellant, v. Paul Fisher, Appellee.

No. 16-60028

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted February 12, 2018 * Pasadena, California

Filed February 15, 2018

Adam Apollo, Placentia, CA, for Appellant

Scott E. Shapiro, Appell Shapiro, LLP, Sherman Oaks, CA, for Appellee

Before: McKEOWN and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges, and QUIST,** District Judge.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

**

 The Honorable Gordon J. Quist, United States District Judge for the Western District of Michigan, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM ***

Debtor Andrew Reder appeals from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (“BAP”) judgment affirming the bankruptcy court’s order determining that Reder’s $110,000 debt to Appellee Paul Fisher is nondis-chargeable pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We review de novo decisions of the BAP. *See Scovis v. Henrichsen (In re*Scovis), 249 F.3d 975, 980 (9th Cir. 2001). “Because this court is in as good a position as the BAP to review the decision of the bankruptcy court, we review the bankruptcy court’s decision independently.” Gay*den v. Nourbakhsh (In re Nourbakhsh),*67 F.3d 798, 800 (9th Cir. 1995) (per curiam).

After a review of the record and briefing, we affirm for the reasons stated in the BAP’s well-reasoned and thorough memorandum decision entered on March 8, 2016.

AFFIRMED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 976 

To direct the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to enter 

into appropriate arrangements with the National Academies of Sciences, 

Engineering, and Medicine to provide for a report on the health impacts 

of air traffic noise and pollution, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 5, 2019 

Mr. LYNCH (for himself, Mr. KRISHNAMOORTHI, Mr. TED LIEU of California, 

Ms. ESHOO, Mr. RASKIN, Mr. SMITH of Washington, Mr. QUIGLEY, Mr. 

SHERMAN, Ms. BROWNLEY of California, Mr. LIPINSKI, Mr. 

LOWENTHAL, Ms. SPEIER, Ms. JUDY CHU of California, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Ms. BASS, Ms. NORTON, Mr. SUOZZI, and Miss 

RICE of New York) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To direct the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to enter into appropriate arrangements with the 

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine to provide for a report on the health impacts of 

air traffic noise and pollution, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Air Traffic Noise and 

5 Pollution Expert Consensus Act of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 976 IH

1 SEC. 2. HEALTH IMPACTS OF AIR TRAFFIC NOISE AND POL2 LUTION. 

3 (a) STUDY.—The Administrator of the Federal Avia4 tion Administration shall enter into appropriate arrange5 ments with the Health and Medicine Division of the Na6 tional Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine 

7 under which the Division will— 

8 (1) not later than 30 days after the date of en9 actment of this Act, convene a committee of experts 

10 in health and environmental science to examine the 

11 various health impacts of air traffic noise and pollu12 tion; and 

13 (2) issue a corresponding expert consensus re14 port that sets forth current scientific knowledge re15 lating to the various health impacts of air traffic 

16 noise and pollution. 

17 (b) REPORT.—Upon completion of the consensus re18 port, the Division shall transmit the report to— 

19 (1) the Administrator; 

20 (2) the Secretary of Health and Human Serv21 ices; 

22 (3) the Administrator of the Environmental 

23 Protection Agency; 

24 (4) the Committee on Transportation and In25 frastructure and the Committee on Oversight and 

26 Reform of the House of Representatives; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 976 IH

1 (5) the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 

2 Transportation and the Committee on Homeland Se3 curity and Governmental Affairs of the Senate. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
U.S. Energy Information Administration | Quarterly Coal Report, January - March 2024

Table 20. Coal imports by customs district

(short tons)

Year to date

Customs district January - March

2024

October - December

2023

January - March

2023 2024 2023

Percent

change

Eastern Total 44,252 14 46,914 44,252 46,914 -5.7

Buffalo, NY 195 14 11 195 11 NM

Ogdensburg, NY 22 - - 22 - -

Portland, ME 44,035 - 46,903 44,035 46,903 -6.1

Southern Total 109,397 738,386 822,351 109,397 822,351 -86.7

Houston-Galveston, TX 7,410 42,479 27,192 7,410 27,192 -72.7

Laredo, TX 354 172 2,119 354 2,119 -83.3

Miami, FL 1 70 207 1 207 -99.5

Mobile, AL 3,423 497,699 370,163 3,423 370,163 -99.1

New Orleans, LA 68,112 4,336 81,688 68,112 81,688 -16.6

San Juan, PR 30,097 193,630 301,755 30,097 301,755 -90.0

Tampa, FL - - 39,227 - 39,227 -

Western Total 115,381 118,613 104,469 115,381 104,469 10.4

Great Falls, MT 114,799 116,397 103,701 114,799 103,701 10.7

Los Angeles, CA 120 - - 120 - -

San Francisco, CA - - 3 - 3 -

Seattle, WA 462 2,216 765 462 765 -39.6

Northern Total 59,889 124,252 46,532 59,889 46,532 28.7

Chicago, IL 10,677 23,627 - 10,677 - -

Cleveland, OH 1,898 1,614 72 1,898 72 NM

Detroit, MI 26,821 83,890 27,161 26,821 27,161 -1.3

Duluth, MN 2,899 1,675 2,327 2,899 2,327 24.6

Pembina, ND 17,594 13,446 16,970 17,594 16,970 3.7

St. Louis, MO - - 2 - 2 -

Total 328,919 981,265 1,020,266 328,919 1,020,266 -67.8

- = No data reported.

NM = Not meaningful due to changes of 500 percent or more.

Note: Coal imports include coal to Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. Total may not equal sum of components because of independent rounding.

Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, 'Monthly Report IM 145.'
No. 12-5469.

#### Rozzelle *v.*Tucker, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 54 (Thursday, March 20, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 13355]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-7031]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Office of Civilian and Radioactive Waste Management

10 CFR Part 960

RIN 1901-1172


General Guidelines for the Recommendation of Sites for Nuclear 
Waste Repositories

AGENCY: Proposed rule; Reopening of public comment period.

SUMMARY: In response to additional requests from several interested 
persons, the Department of Energy has granted additional time to 
comment on proposed amendments to 10 CFR Part 960 that were published 
at 61 FR 66158, December 16, 1996.\1\

    \1\ See also 62 FR 4941, Feb. 3, 1997.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Comments should be received no later than April 16, 1997.

ADDRESSES: All written comments are to be submitted to April V. Gil, 
U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste 
Management, Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Office, PO Box 98608, 
or provided by electronic mail to 10CFR<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#dee7e8ee9eb0b1aabbadf0a7b3aef0b9b1a8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5f66696f1f31302b3a2c7126322f71383029">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: April V. Gil, U.S. Department of 
Energy, Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, Yucca Mountain 
Site Characterization Office, PO Box 98608, Las Vegas, Nevada 89193, 
(800) 967-3477.

    Issued in Washington, DC on this 14th day of March, 1997.
Lake Barrett,
Acting Director, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Civilian 
Radioactive Waste Management.
[FR Doc. 97-7031 Filed 3-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Justin L. WILLIAMS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

ED 104763

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.

Filed: November 7, 2017

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied December 19, 2017

Kevin B. Gau, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 68101, For Mov-ant/Appellant.

Karen L. Kramer, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 66102, For Respondent/Respondent.

Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., and Kurt S. Odenwald, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Justin L. Williams appeals from the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order of the motion court denying his Rule 24.0351 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing on one of two claims. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k); Little v. State, 427 S.W.3d 846, 850 (Mo. App. E.D. 2014). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the decision pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R. Crim. P. 2014, unless otherwise indicated.
<PAGE>   1

                                 EXHIBIT 10(k)*


         Amendment dated June 1, 1996 to Advisory Agreement between the
         Registrant and the Advisor.

<PAGE>   2
 

                                  June 1, 1996
 



Mid-America ReaFund Advisors, Inc.
1385 Eaton Center
Cleveland, Ohio 44114

Attention:  James H. Berick, President

Dear Jim:

         Please be advised that the Trustees of Realty ReFund Trust (the
"Trust") have agreed to extend the Advisory Agreement between Mid-America
ReaFund Advisors, Inc. (the "Adviser") and the Trust, for an additional term of
one (1) year expiring June, 1997, on the same terms, conditions and provisions
contained in the original Agreement as extended from time to time.

         If this Agreement to extend meets with the approval of the Adviser,
please acknowledge the same on the copy of this letter enclosed for that
purpose.

                                        Very truly yours,

                                        Realty ReFund Trust



                                        By  /s/ Alan M. Krause

                                            Alan M. Krause
                                            Chairman


                                        And /s/ Christine Turk

                                            Christine Turk
                                            Secretary


/ct
Enclosure

                  The foregoing extension is hereby accepted.

                                    Mid-America ReaFund Advisors, Inc.



                                    By /s/ James H. Berick

                                      James H. Berick, President
#### Spero Zepatos v. Speros George Tragas.

154 So. 330.

Opinion Filed April 24, 1934.

*Hull, Landis & Whitehair,*for Appellant;

*Green & West,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

— This was a suit to enforce the provisions of a declaration of trust.

It is not contended that the trust was not enforceable if the declaration of trust was made, executed and delivered in the manner and form alleged in the bill of complaint as amended.

There is substantial evidence disclosed by the record to sustain the contention that the declaration of trust was made, executed and delivered in the manner alleged in the bill of complaint, although there is contrary evidence.

*605A purported copy of the declaration of trust was offered in evidence and objected to upon the ground that no proper predicate had been laid for the introduction of such copy. It may be that the complainant should have been required lo prove the loss or destruction of the original before the copy became admissible as evidence, unless it was shown that the original was in the possession of the defendant and that he, after due notice requiring him to produce the same, had failed and refused to produce it. But, if error was committed in the admitting of the copy in evidence, such error became of no moment when the defendant himself thereafter testified in the cause that he had taken possession and control of the original document and that he had destroyed the same. Furthermore, the record does show that during the proceedings and prior to the taking of the testimony notice and demand had been made on the defendant by the complainant to produce the original document before the court and the defendant had failed and refused to produce such original, but in lieu thereof had filed objections to complying with the order, which objections were not sustained.

The record fails to reflect the fact that persons not made parties to this suit were necessary parties to this litigation. The persons named and alleged to be necessary parties not included as parties to the suit may at some future time have rights accrue under the terms of the alleged declaration of trust, but the record does not show that they have any present interest in the issues presented or that any future interest which they may have is affected by the final decree entered herein.

The record disclosing no reversible error, the final decree should be affirmed and it is so ordered.

Affirmed.

*606Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 54 (Thursday, March 20, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 13401]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-7025]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Special Emphasis Panel in Geosciences: Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act )(Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting.

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in the Geosciences (1756).
    Date and Time: April 9-11, 1997, 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd, Room 730, 
Arlington, VA 22230, Room 730.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Herman B. Zimmerman, Program Director for 
the Paleoclimate Program, Division of Atmospheric Science, Room 775, 
National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230, 
Telephone number is (703) 306-1527.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide and make recommendation 
concerning the Earth System History (ESH) proposals.
    Agenda: to review and evaluate the Earth System History (ESH) 
proposals.
    Reason for Closing: The proposal being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data; and personal information 
concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These matters 
are exempted under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government 
Sunshine Act.

    Dated: March 17, 1997.
Linda Allen-Benton,
Deputy Director, Division of Human Resource Management, Acting 
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-7025 Filed 3-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-26-1998             DEC-27-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-28-1997             DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-26-1998             SEP-27-1997
<CASH>                                          30,271                  27,481
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  424,429                 287,592
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,178                   4,431
<INVENTORY>                                    336,205                 486,199
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               813,313                 812,757
<PP&E>                                          94,583                  86,366
<DEPRECIATION>                                 109,383                  74,491
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,158,646               1,004,089
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          598,959                 731,591
<BONDS>                                        141,500                  55,250
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                         1,677                   1,157
<OTHER-SE>                                     412,524                 213,091
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,158,646               1,004,089
<SALES>                                      3,201,410               2,827,238
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,201,410               2,827,238
<CGS>                                        2,928,580               2,591,241
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,928,580               2,591,241
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               192,911                 181,822
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,685                  21,673
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 54,234                  32,502
<INCOME-TAX>                                    22,308                  13,319
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             31,926                  19,183
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    31,926                  19,183
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.02                    1.68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.71                    1.49
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 21.1

Subsidiaries of Registrant

Symmetricom, Ltd.
Symmetricom Puerto Rico Ltd.
Manufacturing Solutions Puerto Rico, Inc. (in liquidation)
Symmetricom Hong Kong, Ltd. (in liquidation)
Symmetricom Global Services, Inc.
Symmetricom GmbH
Symmcom Beijing Trading Company, Ltd
Telecom Solutions, Inc. (inactive)
Analog Solutions, Inc. (inactive)
TrueTime, Inc. (inactive)
Timing Solutions Corporation (in liquidation)
QoSmetrics, Inc. (in liquidation)
QoSmetrics, S.A (in liquidation)
Timing Application Inc. (in liquidation)

---



QuickLinks