alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                       64,631
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     17,067
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          87,998
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                         1,370
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                   3,575
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 174,641
<COMMON>                                        19,039
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      116,808
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             13,196
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 149,043
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                                 0
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                        0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                  25,598
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  174,641
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      286,623
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             2,129
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     108,636
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     246,884
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         39,739
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                            (19,344)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  18,266
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,266
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                        0
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        95,193
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          30,078
<EPS-BASIC>                                       .010
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .010


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 49 (Thursday, March 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11917-11918]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6273]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. 9601 
to 9675

    Notice is hereby given that a proposed consent decree modification 
in United

[[Page 11918]]

States v. Blocksom, Inc., Civil Action No. 3:97CV0146RM, was lodged on 
February 27, 1997 with the United States District Court for the 
Northern District of Indiana, South Bend Division. The proposed consent 
decree resolves the United States' claims against one settling 
defendant for unreimbursed past costs incurred in connection with the 
Waste, Inc. Superfund Site located in Michigan City, Indiana in return 
for a total payment of $50,000.
    The Department of Justice will receive, for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication, comments relating to the 
proposed consent decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant 
Attorney General for the Environment and Natural Resources Division, 
Department of Justice, Washington, DC. 20530, and should refer to 
United States v. Blocksom, Inc., DOJ Ref. # 90-11-3-1376.
    The proposed consent decree my be examined at the office of the 
United States Attorney, 204 South Main Street, M01 Federal Building, 
South Bend, Indiana 44601; the Region 5 Office of the Environmental 
Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604; 
and at the Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street, NW., 4th Floor, 
Washington, DC. 20005, (202) 624-0892. A copy of the proposed consent 
decree may be obtained in person or by mail from the Consent Decree 
Library, 1120 G Street, NW., 4th Floor, Washington, DC. 20005. In 
requesting a copy please refer to the referenced case and enclose a 
check in the amount of $5.00 (25 cents per page reproduction costs), 
payable to the Consent Decree Library.
Joel M. Gross,
Chief, Environment and Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 97-6273 Filed 3-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
# C_2022276EN.01001302.xml

| 18.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 276/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 276/13

---

Action brought on 23 May 2022 — Domaine Boyar International v EUIPO — Consorzio DOC Bolgheri e Bolgheri Sassicaia (BOLGARÉ)

(Case T-300/22)

(2022/C 276/20)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Domaine Boyar International (Sofia, Bulgaria) (represented by: F. Bojinova, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Consorzio DOC Bolgheri e Bolgheri Sassicaia (Castagneto Carducci, Italy)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark BOLGARÉ — Application for registration No 16 670 937

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 March 2022 in Case R 2564/2019-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision in its entirety; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision in its entirety;

| — | order EUIPO and interested party to pay the costs incurred by the applicant in relation to the present action of annulment. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and interested party to pay the costs incurred by the applicant in relation to the present action of annulment.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 46(1)(d) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 46(1)(d) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 8(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council in connection with Article 103(2)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council in connection with Article 103(2)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer**

**Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002**

 

I, Burton M. Tansky, certifythat:

 

1.     I have reviewed this amendment to the quarterly report on Form 10-Q/Aof The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.;

 

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)     designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)     disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s second fiscal quarter) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a)     all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.

 

Date: May 27, 2005

 
|   | /s/   BURTON  M. TANSKY    |
|--------|-------------------------------------------|
|   | **Burton M. Tansky**                      |
|   | **President and Chief Executive Officer** |

 

1

----
Lauralyn ("Laura") J. Remo

DOT,Office of Aviation Analysis, Air Carrier Fitness Division, X-56

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E.

Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: Island Air Express as US Mail Carrier

Dear Mrs. Remo,

I am writing this letter in support of Island Air Express as a dependable and safe air service to Klawock. I 

have either been living on Prince of Wales Island or making frequent trips to the Island since 1987 and 

continue to do so. In addition, I served as the school superintendent for the Klawock City School District 

for a period of ten years.

All of these experiences have been an excellent opportunity to observe multiple (countless) disruptions 

of mail service to Klawock and the subsequent cost in time, efficiency and actual dollar costs.

The advent of IFR through Island Air Express is a historic step forward safer travel and dependable mail 

service. Both of these issues will immensely benefit all of the residents of the area.

Island Air Express is clearly the best choice for delivery of our mail.

Sincerely,

Morris D. Ververs, Ed.D.

31550 County Road 74

Simla, CO 80835
#### COM. v. LENARD, J.

353 MDA 2017

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/27/2017

CP-22-CR-0000541-2006 (Dauphin)

Affirmed
# C_2023179EN.01001201.xml

| 22.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/12

---

Appeal brought on 18 July 2022 by KM against the order of the General Court (President) delivered on 19 May 2022 in Case T-120/22 AJ, KM v Council of the European Union, European Commission, European External Action Service (EEAS) and Eulex Kosovo

(Case C-486/22 P)

(2023/C 179/16)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: KM (represented by: P. Koutrakos, dikigoros, F. Randolph, advocaat, and J. Stojsavljevic-Savic, Solicitor)

Other parties to the proceedings: Council of the European Union, European Commission, European External Action Service (EEAS), Eulex Kosovo

By order of 31 March 2023, the Court of Justice (Sixth Chamber) held that the appeal was dismissed due to a manifest lack of jurisdiction of the Court and that KM should bear his own costs.

---
# Gainful Employment

- Department of Education Releases Proposed Rules on Accountability for Certificate and For-Profit Programs and Transparency into Unaffordable Student Debt Today, the U.S. Department of Education (Department) released proposed regulations to establish the strongest set of safeguards ever to protect students from unaffordable debt or insufficient earnings from career training programs, along with new measures to increase transparency across all postsecondary programs.
No. 12-5142.

#### Wheaten *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Julio Cesar RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-50261 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed March 14, 2018

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, Mara Asya Blatt, Esq., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. .Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

David Kenneth Sergi, Sergi *&*Associates, P.C., San Marcos, TX, for Defendant-Appellant

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Julio Ramirez pleaded guilty of conspiring to possess with intent to distribute 50 grams or more of methamphetamine. The district court sentenced Ramirez within the advisory guideline range to 235 months of imprisonment and five years of supervised release. Ramirez appeals the sen*471tence, claiming that the court relied on unreliable co-conspirator statements to determine the amount of methamphetamine attributable to him through relevant conduct.

Ramirez has not shown that the court clearly erred in adopting the finding in the presentence report (“PSR”) that he was responsible for a drug quantity that resulted in a base offense level of 36 under U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(a)(5). *See United States v.*Betancourt, 422 F.3d 240, 246 (5th Cir. 2005). The PSR stated that the drug quantity attributable to Ramirez was based on co-conspirator statements and on drugs that were confiscated by law enforcement. The PSR had sufficient indicia of reliability to be considered as evidence, because it was based on information that a case agent obtained from other members of the drug conspiracy. *See United States v. Gomez-Alvarez,*781 F.3d 787, 796 (5th Cir. 2015). Ramirez failed to prove that the information in the PSR concerning the multi-pound quantities of methamphetamine was “materially untrue, inaccurate or unreliable.” *United States v. Harris,*702 F.3d 226, 230 (5th Cir. 2012).

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 54 (Thursday, March 20, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 13302]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6971]



[[Page 13302]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------


COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION
17 CFR Part 140


Change in Titles of Personnel

AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: CFTC is correcting an error in a change to titles of personnel 
previously published in the Federal Register on May 13, 1996, (61 FR 
21955). The original document contained an erroneous paragraph 
reference.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 13, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stacy Dean Yochum, Counsel to the Executive Director, Commodity Futures 
Trading Commission, Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st St. NW., 
Washington, DC 20581, (202) 418-5157.

Correction

    In the final rule FR Doc. 96-11923, beginning on page 21954 in the 
Federal Register issue of May 13, 1996, make the following correction:
    On page 21955, in the first column, in amendment 4. to 
Sec. 140.735-8, the reference to ``paragraph (a)(3)'' is corrected to 
read ``paragraph (b)(3).''

    Dated: March 14, 1997.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 97-6971 Filed 3-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                          5

<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                  APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                    SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          136,788
<SECURITIES>                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   1,236,873
<ALLOWANCES>                                    176,292
<INVENTORY>                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                1,263,753
<PP&E>                                          219,448
<DEPRECIATION>                                  174,925
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  1,771,751
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           2,024,862
<BONDS>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     1,000
<COMMON>                                        353,019
<OTHER-SE>                                      (951,557)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    1,771,751
<SALES>                                         2,568,214
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                2,568,214
<CGS>                                           1,558,593
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   1,558,593
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                1,019,655
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,595
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 73,077
<INCOME-TAX>                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             73,077
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    73,077
<EPS-BASIC>                                   0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32


                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of AEI Real Estate  Fund
XVII Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the
period  ended  March 31, 2009, as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on  the  date hereof  (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned, Robert P. Johnson, President of AEI Fund  Management
XVII, Inc., the Managing General Partner of the Partnership,  and
Patrick  W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer of AEI Fund Management
XVII,  Inc., each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Partnership.


                          /s/ Robert P Johnson
                              Robert P. Johnson, President
                              AEI Fund Management XVII, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              May 12, 2009



                          /s/ Patrick W Keene
                              Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer
                              AEI Fund Management XVII, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              May 12, 2009
#### CASCADES PROJECTION LLC, Appellant v. EPSON AMERICA, INC., Sony Corporation, Appellees

2017-1517

2017-1518

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 13, 2018

Philip P. Mann, Mann Law Group, Seattle, WA, argued for appellant. Also represented by Robert Greenspoon, Flachs-bart & Greenspoon, LLC, Chicago, IL.

David J. Ball, Jr., Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee Epson America, Inc. Also represented by Nicholas P. Gro-ombridge, Jenny Chía Cheng Wu, New York, NY.

Andrew J. Bramhall, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart *&*Sullivan, LLP, Redwood Shores, CA, argued for appellee Sony Corporation. Also represented by Kevin P.B. Johnson; Matthew A. Smith, Smith Baluch LLP, Washington, DC.

(Reyna, Wallach, and Hughes, Circuit Judges).

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
No. 11-10622.

#### Sims *v.*Rios et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# C_2023261EN.01003101.xml

| 24.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 261/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 261/31

---

Judgment of the General Court of 7 June 2023 — DDR Kultur v EUIPO — Groupe Canal+ (THE PLANET)

(Case T-47/22) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark THE PLANET - Earlier EU figurative mark PLANÈTE + - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2023/C 261/43)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: DDR Kultur UG (haftungsbeschränkt) (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: I. Yeboah, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Bosse and D. Gája, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Groupe Canal+, (Issy-les-Moulineaux, France) (represented by M. Georges-Picot and C. Cuny, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 25 November 2021 (Case R 2385/2020-2).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 25 November 2021 (Case R 2385/2020-2); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 25 November 2021 (Case R 2385/2020-2);

| 2. | Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by DDR Kultur UG (haftungsbeschränkt) in the proceedings before the Court; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by DDR Kultur UG (haftungsbeschränkt) in the proceedings before the Court;

| 3. | Orders Groupe Canal+ to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Groupe Canal+ to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 128, 21.3.2022

---
Exhibit 4.2

Consent of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm


We have issued our report
dated July 9, 2021, with respect to the financial statement of Advisors Disciplined Trust 2078 contained in Amendment No. 1 to the Registration
Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-255282) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in the Registration
Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Experts”.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


July 9, 2021