alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

I, Jason A. Breaux, certify that: 

 
 (1)
I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Crescent CapitalBDC, Inc.; 

 
 (2)
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 
 (3)
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 
 (4)
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and have: 

 
 a.
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared; 

 
 b.
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 
 c.
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 
 (5)
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 
 a.
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 
 b.
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 
Date: March 22, 2019  By: 
/s/ Jason A. Breaux
   Jason A. Breaux   Chief Executive Officer
 
**
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FORM THE BALANCE
SHEET OF WINDSOR PARK PROPERTIES 5 AS OF JUNE 30, 1997 AND THE RELATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE SIX MONTHS THEN ENDED AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         303,500
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       3,599,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 909,700
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,417,700
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      1,097,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,250,600<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,417,700
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               297,100
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  130,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               104,800
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              52,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,700
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,700
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,700
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.04<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Limited and general partners equity.
<F2>Net income per limited partnership unit.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### KUNA, A. v. UCBR

135 CD 2016

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

10/31/2017

Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, B-585242

Affirmed
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 Of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned
officers of Rand Capital Corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that: The Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 (the Form 10-K) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Dated: March 8, 2022/s/  Daniel P. PenberthyDaniel P. Penberthy, Chief Executive Officer and President(Chief Executive Officer)Dated: March 8, 2022/s/  Margaret W. BrechtelMargaret W. Brechtel, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer(Chief Financial Officer)
No. 12-5307.

#### Proctor *v.*Clarke, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 12-5324.

#### Anderson *v.*California.

Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
No. 12-113.

#### Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. *v.*McReynolds et al.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 48 (Wednesday, March 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 11427]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6131]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP97-237-001]


TransColorado Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Request for 
Waiver

March 6, 1997.
    Take notice that on March 3, 1997, TransColorado Gas Transmission 
Company (TransColorado) requested waiver of the implementation date in 
the Commission's letter order issued February 24, 1997 to permit 
TransColorado to delay implementation of the Gas Industry Standards 
Board (GISB) Standards from April 1, 1997 to June 1, 1997.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed on 
or before March 13, 1997. Protests will be considered by the Commission 
in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve 
to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-6131 Filed 3-11-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1036 

Expressing support for the Fourth of July, America’s birthday, and bringing 

celebration and fireworks to our Nation’s ‘‘Shrine of Democracy’’ at 

Mount Rushmore. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 1, 2020 

Mr. JOHNSON of South Dakota submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the Fourth of July, America’s birthday, and bringing celebration and fireworks to our Nation’s ‘‘Shrine of Democracy’’ at Mount Rushmore. 

Whereas, on July 3, 1776, Founding Father John Adams 

wrote to Abigail Adams expressing his belief that the 

signing of the Declaration of Independence should be 

commemorated ‘‘with Pomp and Parade, with Shows, 

Games, Sports, Guns, Bells, Bonfires and Illuminations 

from one End of this Continent to the other from this 

Time forward forever more’’; 

Whereas, on July 4, 1777, reflecting the vision of John 

Adams, fireworks were set off in Philadelphia as part of 

a celebration to commemorate Independence Day; 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1036 IH 

Whereas throughout our history, Americans in cities and 

towns large and small have celebrated the birth of our 

great Nation; 

Whereas an estimated 49 million Americans traveled on vacation to these cities and towns during the Fourth of July 

holiday in 2019; 

Whereas for the first time in over 10 years, Mount Rushmore, our Nation’s ‘‘Shrine of Democracy’’, will resume 

using fireworks in 2020; 

Whereas many cities and towns across the country are canceling or are considering canceling their annual Fourth of 

July celebrations: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes the historic importance of patri3 otic displays in the United States in annual Inde4 pendence Day celebrations; 

5 (2) supports the commitment to bring fireworks 

6 back to our Nation’s ‘‘Shrine of Democracy’’ at 

7 Mount Rushmore; and 

8 (3) urges cities, towns, counties, and other mu9 nicipalities to save the Fourth of July by reconsid10 ering postponing or canceling their Fourth of July 

11 celebrations, so that Americans can enjoy our Na12 tion’s birthday in a responsible and appropriate 

13 manner. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 52 (Tuesday, March 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 12823]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6763]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. TM97-1-54-001]


Louisiana Nevada Transit Company; Notice of Refund Report

March 12, 1997.
    Take notice that on February 28, 1997, Louisiana Nevada Transit 
Company (LNT) filed a refund report in Docket No. TM97-1-54-000. LNT 
states that the filing and refunds of Annual Charges Adjustment (ACA) 
surcharges were made in compliance with the Commission's Order of 
January 14, 1997 in the referenced Docket. LNT states that refunds were 
disbursed to its jurisdictional customers on February 13, 1997.
    LNT states that: (1) no refunds were disbursed for the period 
October 1, 1992 through September 30, 1996, because all jurisdictional 
transportation was discounted below LNT's maximum transportation rate, 
at a discount level greater than the $0.0023 per Mcf surcharge amount; 
(2) refunds for the period October 1, 1995 through September 30, 1996 
in the amount of $155.57 including interest calculated in accordance 
with 18 CFR 154.501(d), were paid to Arkla, A Division of NorAm Energy 
Corporation (Arkla) for transportation services performed from March 1, 
1996 through September 30, 1996 for all ACA surcharge amounts collected 
above the Commission-approved rate of $0.0023 per Mcf; and (3) refunds 
for the period October 1, 1996 through December 31, 1996 in the amount 
of $128.01 including interest calculated in accordance with 18 CFR 
154.501(d), were paid to Arkla for transportation services performed 
during that period for all ACA surcharge amounts collected above the 
Commission-approved rate of $0.0020 per Mcf.
    LNT further states that copies of its refund report filing have 
been served on all affected customers and state commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211). All such protests 
should be filed on or before March 19, 1997. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-6763 Filed 3-17-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT 21

                   Certain Subsidiaries of PNM Resources, Inc.


        As of December 31, 2001, PNM Resources, Inc. directly owns all of the
voting securities of the following "significant subsidiary" (as defined in Rule
1-02(v) of Regulation S-X):

             Public Service Company of New Mexico a New Mexico corporation.
             Public Service Company of New Mexico does business under the
             names "PNM", "PNM Electric and Gas Services", "PNM Electric
             Services" and "PNM Gas Services".

        The remaining subsidiaries of PNM Resources, Inc. (including Avistar,
Inc., a New Mexico corporation), considered in the aggregate as a single
subsidiary, do not constitute a "significant subsidiary" as of the end of the
year covered by this report.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-26-1999             DEC-27-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-28-1998             DEC-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-26-1999             SEP-27-1998
<CASH>                                           6,921                   4,296
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                  22,795
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                   3,222
<INVENTORY>                                          0                  34,968
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,005                  63,046
<PP&E>                                               0                  67,994
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                  38,671
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,005                 183,067
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           72,005                  82,333
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                  60,000
<COMMON>                                             0                     471
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                  32,404
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    72,005                 183,067
<SALES>                                              0                 114,913
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0                 114,913
<CGS>                                                0                 102,095
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                 102,095
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                  57,990
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                   2,868
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0                (48,040)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                     160
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                (48,200)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0                (48,200)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0                  (1.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                  (1.02)


</TABLE>
**Exhibit23.1**

 

**Consentof Independent**

**CertifiedPublic Accountants**

 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference inRegistration Statement No. 333-46030 of InnSuites Hospitality Trust on Form S-8of our report, dated March 12, 2004, except for Note 21, as to which the dateis April 1, 2004, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of InnSuitesHospitality Trust for the year ended January 31, 2004.

 

 
| /s/ McGladrey &  Pullen, LLP |   |
|----------------------------------|--------|
|                             |
| Phoenix, Arizona                 |
| April 29, 2004                   |

 

----
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 10-1194

___________ Larry D. Bittick, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Western District of Missouri. * Jeremiah Nixon; Chris Koster, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: June 1, 2010 Filed: June 16, 2010

___________ Before MELLOY, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Missouri inmate Larry D. Bittick appeals from the order of the District Court 1 dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. Bittick challenged a Missouri state-court judgment that ordered reimbursement for th e cost of his care and custody pursuant to the Missouri Incarceration Reimbursement Act (MIRA). He also sought release and return of funds seized from his inmate account pursuant to the MIRA. We have

1 The Honorable Scott O. Wright, United St ates District Judge for the Western District of Missouri, adopting the re port and recommendations of the Honorable William A. Knox, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Missouri.carefully reviewed the record de novo, see Cooper v. Schriro , 189 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir. 1999) (per curiam), and we concludethat Bittick’s § 1983 action is barred by the Rooker-Feldman 2doctrine, see Skit Int’l, Ltd. v. DAC Techs. of Ark., Inc. , 487 F.3d 1154, 1156 (8th Cir. 2007) ("The Rooker-Feld man doctrine prohibits lower federal courts from exercising appellate review of state court judgments."), cert. denied , 552 U.S. 991 (2007). Accordingly, we affirm.

______________________________

2 See Rooker v. Fid. Trust Co. , 263 U.S. 413 (1923); D.C. Ct. of Appeals v. Feldman , 460 U.S. 462 (1983). -2-
<PAGE>
 
                                  EXHIBIT 12
                                 -------------



              ARCO CHEMICAL COMPANY AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

             COMPUTATION OF THE RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                              (MILLION OF DOLLARS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                  Three Months
                                                  Years Ended December 31,       Ended March 31,
                                            -----------------------------------  ---------------
                                              1993    1994   1995   1996   1997       1998
                                              -----   ----   ----   ----   ----       ----
<S>                                         <C>      <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>        <C>
Pretax income from continuing operations     $ 311   $ 416  $ 756  $ 487  $ 168      $ 135
Add:                                                                              
   Interest expense.......................     105      85     89     86     80         18
   Rental expense factor..................      20      22     25     27     27          6
                                             -----   -----  -----  -----  -----      -----
Earnings available for fixed charges......   $ 436   $ 523  $ 870  $ 600  $ 275      $ 159
                                             =====   =====  =====  =====  =====      =====
                                                                                  
                                                                                  
Interest expense..........................   $ 105   $  85  $  89  $  86  $  80      $  18
Add capitalized interest..................       -       3      1      3      9          2
Rental expense factor.....................      20      22     25     27     27          6
                                             -----   -----  -----  -----  -----      -----
Fixed charges.............................   $ 125   $ 110  $ 115  $ 116  $ 116      $  26
                                             =====   =====  =====  =====  =====      =====
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges........     3.5     4.8    7.6    5.2    2.4        6.1
                                             =====   =====  =====  =====  =====      =====
</TABLE>
1 

Addendum to the 

Technical Support Document 

for the 

Louisiana Regional Haze State Implementation Plan 

Docket ID: EPA-R06-OAR-2008-0510 

June 2012 

Prepared by: 

Ellen Belk 

Carrie Thomas 

U.S. EPA Region 6, Dallas Texas 

 
2 

Revised Table 10. ConocoPhillips Alliance Refinery BART-Subject Units 

EPN Description 

5-factor 

analysis 

included?a

De minimis 

emissions?a,b

Included 

in CD?c

Final 

Action? 

308F-D-l Low Pressure Flare* Y D 

308F-D-2 High Pressure Flare* Y D 

301-B-2A CO Boiler Y D 

301-B-2B CO Boiler Y D 

191-H-1 Crude Charge Heater Y D 

292-H-1 Light Distillate Gulfiner Reactor 

Heater 

Y A 

292-H-2 Light Distillate Gulfiner Stabilizer 

Heater 

Y Y A 

1291-H-2/3 FCCU Light/Heavy Feed Heater Y Y A 

191-H-2 Vacuum Charge Heater Y Y A 

891-H-1 Delayed Coker Charge Heater Y Y A 

491-H-l Alkylation Isostripper Reboiler Y Y A 

491-H-2 Alkylation Depropanizer Reboiler Y Y A 

100-H-1 Coker Charge Storage Heater Y A 

293-H-I Heavy Distillate Gulfiner Reactor 

Feed Heater 

Y Y A 

293-H-2 Heavy Distillate Gulfiner Stabilizer 

Reboiler 

Y Y A 

1391-H-1 Catalytic Reformer Feed Heater No. 

1 

Y Y A 

l391-H-2/3 Catalytic Reformer Feed Heater Nos. 

2&3 

Y Y A 

1391-H-4 Depentanizer Reboiler Y Y A 

1391-H-5 Dry Reactivation Heater Y A 

1791-H-1 Reformate Splitter Reboiler Y Y A 

I792-H-l Hydrodealkylation Charge Heater Y Y A 

291-H-l Naphiner Reactor Feed Heater Y Y A 

291-H-2 Naphiner Deisohexanizer Reboiler Y Y A 

303-R-1 Cooling Water Tower No. 1 Y A 

406-D-15 Product Dock No.1 MVR Loading** Y A

406-D-16 Product Dock No.2 MVR Loading** Y A

891-CP Coke Transfer and Storage Y A

a Source: The LA RH SIP submittal, Appendix G; ConocoPhillips Report. 

b Source: See Appendix B to this TSD. 

c Source: Consent Decree and First and Second Amendments to the Consent Decree, Civil Action No. H-05-0285, 

which are in the docket for this action. 

d “A” represents a proposed approval; “D” represents a proposed disapproval. 

*Appendix A of the First Amendment to the Consent Decree includes for Alliance “Low Pressure Flare (coker)” and 

“High Pressure Flare,” which may be the same as these units. 

**Appendix A of the First Amendment to the Consent Decree includes for Alliance “Marine Vapor Recovery Flare 

– 406 D-15” and “Marine Vapor Recovery Flare – 406 D-16.” However, the title for the units is shown as Product 

Dock No. 1 MVR Loading and Production Dock No. 2 MVR Loading in LA RH SIP Appendix G ConocoPhillips’ 

Appendix A table “List of BART-Eligible Units Included in BART Modeling.” It is unclear whether the CD 

addresses the subject to BART units identified by the same numbers.