alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# PLAN EJ 2014



# INFORMATION TOOLS DEVELOPMENT

(EJ SCREEN PROJECT)

DRAFT IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

Led by

Office of Policy

Plan EJ 2014 is EPA’s roadmap to integrate

environmental justice (EJ) into its programs and policies.

2014 represents the 20 th anniversary of the signing of

Executive Order 12898 on environmental justice.Comments regarding the Information Tools Development Draft Implementation Plan can

be submitted on Regulations.gov

.

For more information on Plan EJ 2014, visit the US EPA’s Office of Environmental Justice

website at: http://www.epa.gov/environmentaljustice/plan

‐ ej/index.html

.Plan EJ 2014: Information Tools Development Draft Implementation Plan, March 1, 2011

1.0 INTRODUCTION

Under Plan EJ 2014, EPA has committed to develop a nationally consistent screening tool to

enhance environmental justice (EJ) analysis and decision

‐ making. As a result of this effort,

increased consistency of data and methods will be brought to EJ screening work across EPA, and

communities will have a better understanding of how EPA screens for potential EJ concerns. This

work is a specific element of Plan EJ 2014 and furthers the Administrator’s environmental justice

priority.

1.1 Goal

EPA seeks to make a nationally consistent screening tool available to all Program Offices and

Regions within three years.

1.2 Organizational Structure

The Office of Policy has the lead on this project. The project is overseen by a steering committee

comprised of Assistant Administrators or their designees from the Office of Policy, Office of

Enforcement and Compliance Assurance/Office of Environmental Justice, the Office of Research

and Development, the Office of Environmental Information, and Regions 7, 8, and 9. In addition, a

staff level workgroup meets regularly and has participation from nearly every Program Office and

Region.

2.0 IMPLEMENTATION

 Activity 1 : Hold regular staff workgroup and project steering committee meetings.

 Activity 2 : Develop a set of options to present to Senior Agency Officials.

 Activity 3 : Create a working prototype of screening tool.

 Activity 4 : Update the National Environmental Justice Advisory Council on progress.

 Activity 5 : Obtain peer review and public comment on a prototype tool.

 Activity 6 : Revise the screening tool based on comments.

 Activity 7 : Incorporate the screening tool into EPA’s common mapping platform.

2.1 Adjustments

Adjustments to the prototype tool may be made after public comment, after peer review, and in

response to feedback from early users.

3.0 DELIVERABLES

A detailed schedule of deliverables has yet to be developed for this project.

3.1 Reports

For information, please contact: Glynis Hill, 202

‐ 564

‐ 1139, hill.glynis@epa.gov

.

1
#### Garland A. JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOLSON; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-17060

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted February 13, 2018 *

Filed February 23, 2018

Garland A. Jones, Pro Se

Before: LEAVY, FERNANDEZ, and ' MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App, P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Garland A. Jones, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the magistrate judge’s order denying his motion for relief from judgment. We dismiss this appeal for lack jurisdiction because Jones failed to appeal timely from the magistrate judge’s order denying his motion for relief from judgment. *See*Fed. R; App. P. 4(a)(1)(A); *Bowles v. Russell,*551 U.S. 205, 209, 127 S.Ct. 2360, 168 L.Ed.2d 96 (2007) (timely notice of appeal is mandatory and jurisdictional); *see also*Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1) (inmate’s notice of appeal is deemed filed when deposited in the institution’s internal mail system if accompanied by supporting declaration or evidence); *Houston v. Lack,*487 U.S. 266, 273, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988) (pro se prisoner’s notice of appeal is deemed filed when delivered to the prison authorities for forwarding to the court).

DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
quarterly filing on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 1997 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                      75,693,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               65,264,000
<ALLOWANCES>                               (1,260,000)
<INVENTORY>                                 22,709,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           169,960,000
<PP&E>                                     159,838,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (57,799,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             329,861,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       58,794,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     13,000
<COMMON>                                    38,045,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  90,505,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               329,861,000
<SALES>                                     65,807,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            65,807,000
<CGS>                                       49,057,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               67,699,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            11,836,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,410,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              7,534,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,854,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,680,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,680,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .14
        

</TABLE>
No. 12-5002.

#### Rivera-Santana *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 11

                        Computation of Per Share Earnings


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  Year ended December 31
                                  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                   1997                           1996                           1995
                                  --------------------------------- --------------------------------- ------------------------------
                                              Weighted Avg.   Per               Weighted Avg.  Per              Weighted Avg.  Per
                                    Income       Shares      Share    Income       Shares     Share    Income     Shares      Share
                                  (Numerator) (Denominator)  Amount (Numerator) (Denominator) Amount (Numerator)(Denominator) Amount
<S>                                <C>          <C>           <C>   <C>           <C>          <C>   <C>           <C>         <C>
Income from continuing operations. $ 3,205,000                      $ 3,056,000                      $ 6,248,000
Less: Preferred stock dividends ..        --                            (12,000)                         (96,000)
Net Income Per Share - Basic:
                                   -----------                      -----------                      -----------
Income available to common
shareholders ..................... $ 3,205,000  8,100,055     $.40  $ 3,044,000    8,096,961   $.38  $ 6,152,000   8,096,449   $.76
Effect of Dilutive Securities:
Options granted to employees .....                274,436                             84,783                          74,234
Options granted to nonemployee
 directors .......................                 35,386                             16,312                           5,136
Net Income Per Share - Diluted:
                                                ---------                          ---------                       ---------
Income available to common
 shareholders plus assumed
 conversions ..................... $ 3,205,000  8,409,877     $.38  $ 3,044,000    8,198,056   $.37  $ 6,152,000   8,175,819   $.75
</TABLE>
No. 12-5019.

#### Van Hoesen *v.*United States.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
# C_2022002EN.01004501.xml

| 3.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 2/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 2/45

---

Action brought on 28 October 2021 — Alauzun and Others v Commission

(Case T-695/21)

(2022/C 2/62)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Virginie Alauzun (Saint Cannat, France) and 774 other applicants (represented by: F. Di Vizio, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:

| — | declare that the European Commission (EC) unlawfully failed to include carcinogenicity and genotoxicity testing in the preclinical phase for the mRNA-technology vaccines; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that the European Commission (EC) unlawfully failed to include carcinogenicity and genotoxicity testing in the preclinical phase for the mRNA-technology vaccines;

| — | order the European Commission to include carcinogenicity and genotoxicity testing in the preclinical phase for mRNA-technology vaccines not yet authorised under the EMA procedure; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Commission to include carcinogenicity and genotoxicity testing in the preclinical phase for mRNA-technology vaccines not yet authorised under the EMA procedure;

| — | order the European Commission to include carcinogenicity and genotoxicity testing in the pharmacovigilance phase for mRNA-technology vaccines already authorised under the EMA procedure; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Commission to include carcinogenicity and genotoxicity testing in the pharmacovigilance phase for mRNA-technology vaccines already authorised under the EMA procedure;

| — | request the Commission to disclose the following information:






  — | the clear legislative basis as to why the testing at issue was not included in the preclinical and pharmacovigilance testing phases; |
| --- | --- | --- |

—

request the Commission to disclose the following information:

—

the clear legislative basis as to why the testing at issue was not included in the preclinical and pharmacovigilance testing phases;

| — | the regulation setting out the mandatory checks required for the authorisation of mRNA-technology vaccines. |
| --- | --- |

—

the regulation setting out the mandatory checks required for the authorisation of mRNA-technology vaccines.

| — | order the European Commission to pay all the costs of the applicants. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Commission to pay all the costs of the applicants.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants allege an infringement of EU law and a failure to act on the part of the Commission. The applicants submit in that regard that the Commission did not comply with its obligation arising under Article 168 TFEU to guarantee a ‘high level of human health protection’ by granting a conditional marketing authorisation to mRNA-technology vaccines in the absence of carcinogenicity and genotoxicity studies.

---
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. Section #1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q ("Form 10-Q") of Galaxy
Nutritional Foods, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2006
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I,
Michael E. Broll, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.


                                        /s/ Michael E. Broll
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Michael E. Broll
                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                        November 14, 2006
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 54 (Thursday, March 20, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 13392]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-7115]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[WY-921-41-5700; WYW132848]

Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease

    Pursuant to the provisions of 30 U.S.C. 188(d) and (e), and 43 CFR 
3108.2-3(a) and (b)(1), a petition for reinstatement of oil and gas 
lease WYW132848 for lands in Big Horn County, Wyoming, was timely filed 
and was accompanied by all the required rentals accruing from the date 
of termination.
    The lessee has agreed to the amended lease terms for rentals and 
royalties at rates of $5.00 per acre, or fraction thereof, per year and 
16 \2/3\ percent, respectively.
    The lessee has paid the required $500 administrative fee and $125 
to reimburse the Department for the cost of this Federal Register 
notice. The lessee has met all the requirements for reinstatement of 
the lease as set out in Section 31 (d) and (e) of the Mineral Lands 
Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188), and the Bureau of Land Management 
is proposing to reinstate lease WYW132848 effective September 1, 1996, 
subject to the original terms and conditions of the lease and the 
increased rental and royalty rates cited above.
Pamela J. Lewis,
Chief, Leasable Minerals Section.
[FR Doc. 97-7115 Filed 3-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-22-P
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 54 (Thursday, March 20, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 13391]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6997]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[AK-962-1410-00; AA-8482-A]


Notice for Publication; Alaska Native Claims Selection

    In accordance with Departmental regulation 43 CFR 2650.7(d), notice 
is hereby given that a decision to issue conveyance under the 
provisions of Sec. 14(a) of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act of 
December 18, 1971, 43 U.S.C. 1601, 1613(a), and Sec. 1427(e) of the 
Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act of December 2, 1980, 
Pub L. 96-487, 94 Stat. 2371, 2525, 2526, will be issued to Ayakulik, 
Inc., for approximately 147 acres. The lands involved are in the 
vicinity of Ayakulik, Alaska.

    U.S. Survey No. 4655, Alaska.

    A notice of the decision will be published once a week, for four 
(4) consecutive weeks, in the Kodiak Daily Mirror. Copies of the 
decision may be obtained by contacting the Alaska State Office of the 
Bureau of Land Management, 222 West Seventh Avenue, #13, Anchorage, 
Alaska 99513-7599 ((907) 271-5960).
    Any party claiming a property interest which is adversely affected 
by the decision, an agency of the Federal government or regional 
corporation, shall have until April 21, 1997 to file an appeal. 
However, parties receiving service by certified mail shall have 30 days 
from the date of receipt to file an appeal. Appeals must be filed in 
the Bureau of Land Management at the address identified above, where 
the requirements for filing an appeal may be obtained. Parties who do 
not file an appeal in accordance with the requirements of 43 CFR Part 
4, Subpart E, shall be deemed to have waived their rights.
Chris Sitbon,
ANCSA Team, Land Law Examiner, Branch of 962 Adjudication.
[FR Doc. 97-6997 Filed 3-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JA-P
No. 11-11119.

#### Shao *v.*California.

Ct. App. Cal., 6th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER          I, M. Michael Owens, Chief Financial Officer of United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. (the“Company”), hereby certify that to my knowledge: (1) The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the“Form 10-K”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2) The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.        Dated:  March 13, 2008 /s/ M. Michael Owens   M. Michael Owens   Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 53 (Wednesday, March 19, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13208-13209]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6931]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration

RTCA, Inc.; Minimum Operational Performance Standards for 
Airborne Navigation Equipment Using Global Positioning System (GPS)

    Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is hereby given for a 
Special Committee 159 meeting to be held April 7-11, 1997, starting at 
9:00 a.m. The meeting will be held at RTCA, 1140 Connecticut Avenue, 
N.W., Washington, DC, 20036.
    The agenda will be as follows:

Specific Working Group (WG) Sessions

    April 7: WG 4A, Precision Landing Guidance (LAAS CAT I/II/III); WG 
4B, Airport Surface Surveillance (morning only for a ``first hour'' 
joint session of WG's 4A and 4B); April 8: Working Group 4A, Precision 
Landing Guidance (LAAS CAT I/II/III). April 9: WG 2, WAAS Precision and 
Change 1 to DO-229; WG 2A, GPS/GLONASS; WG 4B, Airport Surface 
Surveillance (WG 4B will meet at ALPA, 1625 Massachusetts Avenue, 8th 
Floor, Washington, DC).

Plenary Session

    April 10-11: (1) Chairman's Introductory Remarks; (2) Review/
Approval of Minutes of Previous Meeting; (3) Review WG Progress and 
Identify Issues for Resolution: GPS/WAAS (WG 2); GPS/GLONASS (WG 2A); 
GPS/Precision Landing Guidance and Airport Surface Surveillance (WG 4); 
(4) Review for Approval Change 1 to DO-229, Proposed Final Draft; (5) 
Review of EUROCAE Activities; (6) Assignment/Review of Future Work; (7) 
Other Business; (8) Date and Location of Next Meeting.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability.

[[Page 13209]]

With the approval of the chairman, members of the public may present 
oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present statements 
or obtain information should contact the RTCA Secretariat, 1140 
Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 1020, Washington, DC 20036; (202) 833-
9339 (phone); (202) 833-9434 (fax); or http://www.rtca.org (web site). 
Members of the public may present a written statement to the committee 
at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on March 13, 1997.
Janice L. Peters,
Designated Official.
[FR Doc. 97-6931 Filed 3-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-13-M
```
Z^

^,TED STAro

8^

^^^^

1·r^^° AL PROTEO

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY


WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

OFFICE OF 

ADMINISTRATION 

AND RESOURCES 

MANAGEMENT 

James H. Johnson Jr., Ph.D. 

Chairman 

National Advisory Council for Environmental Policy and Technology 

Professor and Dean Emeritus 

College of Engineering, Architecture and Computer Sciences 

Howard University 

2300 Sixth Street, NW 

Washington, D.C. 20059 

I thank you and the members of the National Advisory Council for Environmental Policy and 

Technology for your very detailed and thoughtful effort in issuing NACEPT's third workforce 

planning advice letter on ensuring diversity. It offers very timely and important 

recommendations that we will carefully review and address as we finalize EPA's Diversity and 

Inclusion Strategic Plan. 

As you know, Administrator Jackson is personally committed to ensuring that div&sity and 

inclusion at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency continue to remain an imprtant 

workforce priority. The recommendations you offer will help us to make further advancements in 

strengthening our workforce in this area. 

As always, we look forward to continuing working closely with NACEPT on this abd our many 

other efforts to make EPA one great place to work. 

Should you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me directly, or 

your staff may contact Raul Soto Jr., Associate Assistant Administrator for Diversity, Outreach 

and Collaboration, at (202) 564-0229 or soto.raul(epa.gov . 

Sincerely, 

Craig E. Hooks 

Internet Address (URL) • http://wwwepa.gov


Recycled/Recyclable • Pnnted with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper
No. 12-5058.

#### Melgoza *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-11012.

#### Codiga *v.*Washington.

Sup. Ct. Wash. Cer-tiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         415,431
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               416,831
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 416,831
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           39,084
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     33,769
<COMMON>                                     3,232,418
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   416,831
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,883
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      783
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,666
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    400
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,266
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>