Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 139 / Friday, July 19, 2013 / Notices 43183 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Mail: Federal Docket Management 

System Office, 4800 Mark Center Drive, 

East Tower, Suite 02G09, Alexandria, 

VA 22350–3100. 

Instructions: All submissions received 

must include the agency name, docket 

number and title for this Federal 

Register document. The general policy 

for comments and other submissions 

from members of the public is to make 

these submissions available for public 

viewing on the Internet at http:// 

www.regulations.gov as they are 

received without change, including any 

personal identifiers or contact 

information. 

Any associated form(s) for this 

collection may be located within this 

same electronic docket and downloaded 

for review/testing. Follow the 

instructions at http:// 

www.regulations.gov for submitting 

comments. Please submit comments on 

any given form identified by docket 

number, form number, and title. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To 

request more information on this 

proposed information collection or to 

obtain a copy of the proposal and 

associated collection instruments, 

please write to the Defense Finance and 

Accounting Services—Columbus, Ohio, 

3990 E. Broad Street, Columbus, Ohio 

43216, ATTN: Ms. Kenna Robinett, 

Account Management and Provisioning 

System (AMPS) Program Manager, 

Enterprise Systems. Telephone: (614) 

701–2451 or Mr. Marcus Ritter, Project 

Manager, (317–212–6547); and Defense 

Logistics Agency (DLA), AMPS Program 

Manager, Mr. Walter B. Gooch, System 

Manager, Branch Chief, External 

Solutions, DLA Richmond VA, 8000 

Jefferson Davis Highway, Richmond, 

Virginia 23237. Telephone: (804) 279– 

3075. 

Title; Associated Form; and OMB 

Number: Account Management and 

Provisioning System (AMPS); OMB 

Control Number: 0730–TBD. 

Needs and Uses: The information 

collection requirement is necessary to 

maintain information for operations to 

control and track access to secure 

networks, computer systems, and 

databases. Records are maintained on 

electronic storage media. The SSNs are 

used to allow Non-DoD individuals to 

create a user account within AMPS, and 

for AMPS to track those users. 

Additionally, the SSN is used for 

systems that limit system rights based 

on that number. For example, in the 

Defense Civilian Pay System (DCPS), a 

user is not allowed to access their pay 

records, and that is managed through 

the SSN. 

Affected Public: Individuals or 

Households 

Annual Burden Hours: 209 hours 

Number of Respondents: 2500 

Responses per Respondent: 1 

Average Burden per Response: 5 

minutes 

Frequency: On occasion 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Summary of Information Collection 

AMPS does not extract or interface 

with any other system to obtain PII 

information for users. All users are 

required to set-up a user account to use 

AMPS. AMPS is Common Access Card 

(CAC) enabled and DoD employees will 

access AMPS via their CAC. AMPS can 

extract user data from the Electronic 

Data Interchange-Personnel Identifier 

(EDI/PI) to help set-up the user account. 

Any user that is not issued a CAC will 

enter their information into AMPS to 

create a user account, and will be given 

a user ID and password to access the 

system. 

The following are examples of 

information collected from users: User 

names; SSN (for individuals not in 

possession of a CAC such as newly 

hired Federal employees); U.S. 

citizenship status (i.e., U.S. Citizen, 

Foreign National, other); physical and 

electronic address; work telephone 

numbers; organization; office symbol; 

contractor/employee status; computer 

logon addresses, passwords, and user 

identification codes; type of access/ 

permissions required; verification of 

need to know; dates of mandatory 

information assurance awareness 

training; and security clearance data. 

The system also captures details about 

programs, databases, functions, and 

sites accessed and/or used; dates and 

times of use; and information products 

created, received, or altered during use. 

The records may also contain details 

about access or functionality problems 

telephoned in for technical support 

along with resolution. For individuals 

who telecommute from home or a 

telework center, the records may 

contain the electronic address and 

telephone number at that location. For 

contractors, the system also contains the 

company name, contract number, and 

contract expiration date. 

Dated: July 11, 2013. 

Aaron Siegel, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison 

Officer, Department of Defense. 

[FR Doc. 2013–17376 Filed 7–18–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–P 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

[Docket ID DoD–2013–OS–0090] 

Notice of Availability for Sharpe Permit 

Relinquishment Project Environmental 

Assessment Finding of No Significant 

Impact 

AGENCY: Defense Logistics Agency, DoD. 

ACTION: Notice of Availability (NOA) for 

Sharpe Permit Relinquishment Project 

Environmental Assessment (EA) 

Finding of No Significant Impact 

(FONSI). 

SUMMARY: On April 30, 2013, Defense 

Logistics Agency (DLA) published a 

NOA in the Federal Register (78 FR 

25258–25259) announcing the 

publication of the Sharpe Permit 

Relinquishment Project EA. The EA was 

available for a 30-day public comment 

period which ended May 30, 2013. The 

EA was prepared as required under the 

National Environmental Policy Act 

(NEPA) of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4331 et seq.). 

No comments were received during the 

comment period. This FONSI 

documents the decision of DLA to 

relinquish the permit for use and 

occupancy of the Sharpe Army Depot, 

currently known as Defense Distribution 

Depot San Joaquin, California—Sharpe 

(Sharpe Site) with a determination that 

no significant impacts on the human 

environment are associated with this 

decision. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Defense Distribution Depot San Joaquin, 

California—Sharpe Public Affairs 

Office, P.O. Box 960001, Stockton, CA 

95296–0001, ATTN: Sharpe Permit 

Relinquishment Project. (209) 839–4226. 

DDJCPublicAffairsOffice@dla.mil. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: DLA has 

occupied the Sharpe Site since 1990 

under a Memorandum of Agreement 

with the U.S. Department of the Army 

(Army). DLA is proposing to move its 

operations from the Sharpe Site to its 

Defense Distribution Depot San Joaquin, 

California—Tracy (Tracy Site). 

Currently, DLA has co-existing 

operations at both facilities. 

Consolidation of operations at one 

facility would increase efficiency of 

DLA operations by reducing 

redundancies, thereby reducing 

operational costs. 

Purpose and Need for Action: The 

purpose of the Sharpe Permit 

Relinquishment Project is to return the 

land and improvements at the Sharpe 

Site to the Army as DLA has proposed 

consolidation of its operations from the 

Sharpe Site to its nearby Tracy Site. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
43184 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 139 / Friday, July 19, 2013 / Notices 

Consolidation of the operations into one 

facility increases efficiency of DLA 

operations and reduces operational 

costs. The consolidation would not 

substantially alter other non-DLA 

operations at the Sharpe site and the 

federal government will continue 

ongoing environmental restoration 

efforts at the Sharpe Site following the 

permit relinquishment. 

Proposed Action and Alternatives: 

Under the proposed action, DLA would 

relinquish occupancy and use of the 

property and return the Sharpe Site to 

the Army who owns the land and the 

improvements thereon. DLA wants to 

consolidate activities currently 

performed at the Sharpe Site to its 

existing facilities at the Tracy Site and 

potentially other DLA facilities. Land 

and improvements associated with the 

property would be conveyed back to the 

Army. The Army would assume all 

management responsibilities associated 

with the property. No new construction 

or ground disturbing activities at the 

Tracy Site would result from the 

proposed action. As an alternative to the 

proposed action, DLA considered taking 

no action. The no action alternative 

would have maintained existing 

conditions through continued 

occupancy and use of the facility by 

DLA. Under this alternative, the Army 

would not resume occupancy and use of 

the property and DLA would continue 

to operate the facility until the 

conclusion of its current permit on 

April 11, 2020. The no action alternative 

would not satisfy the project’s purpose 

and need; however, the alternative was 

included in the environmental analysis 

to provide a baseline for comparison 

with the proposed action and was 

analyzed in accordance with Council on 

Environmental Quality regulations for 

implementing NEPA. 

An additional alternative was 

considered, but eliminated from further 

consideration. This alternative included 

relocating Sharpe operations to a nearby 

commercially available site. This 

alternative was dismissed from further 

consideration because there would be 

additional security risks associated with 

operations conducted at non-secured 

facilities, as well as additional 

operational costs. 

Potential Environmental Impacts: 

Potential environmental impacts of the 

proposed action have been assessed and 

compared to the impacts of the no 

action alternative. The proposed action 

is expected to have the following 

impacts: 

• Minor short-term adverse impacts 

to air quality, noise, and traffic during 

the transportation of supplies and 

materials from the Sharpe Site to other 

DLA facilities. 

• A reduction in traffic at the Sharpe 

Site, which would lessen potential 

traffic-related affects to burrowing owls 

with a long-term negligible beneficial 

impact on the biological resources at the 

Sharpe Site. 

• A reduction in the work force at the 

Sharpe Site and an increased work force 

at the Tracy Site. As such, there would 

be a long-term negligible adverse impact 

on the socioeconomic resources on the 

local Lathrop area and a long-term 

negligible beneficial impact on the 

socioeconomic resources on the local 

Tracy area. 

• A temporary increase in economic 

activities resulting in a short-term and 

negligible economic beneficial impact 

for the local economies. 

Determination: DLA has determined 

that implementation of the proposed 

action will not have a significant effect 

on the human environment. Human 

environment was interpreted 

comprehensively to include the natural 

and physical environment and the 

relationship of people with that 

environment. Specifically, no highly 

uncertain or controversial impacts, 

unique or unknown risks, or 

cumulatively significant effects were 

identified. Implementation of the 

proposed action will not result in the 

loss or destruction of significant 

scientific, cultural, or historic resources 

and implementation of the proposed 

action will not violate any federal, state, 

or local laws. Based on the results of the 

analyses performed during the 

preparation of the environmental 

assessment, David Rodriquez, Director, 

DLA Installation Support, concludes the 

proposed action to relinquish the permit 

to use and occupy the Sharpe site does 

not constitute a major federal action 

significantly affecting the quality of the 

human environment within the context 

of the NEPA. Therefore, an 

environmental impact statement for the 

proposed action is not required. 

Dated: July 16, 2013. 

Aaron Siegel, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison 

Officer, Department of Defense. 

[FR Doc. 2013–17377 Filed 7–18–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–P 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

Defense Business Board; Notice of 

Federal Advisory Committee Meeting 

AGENCY: DoD. 

ACTION: Meeting notice; cancellation. 

SUMMARY: On Tuesday, July 9, 2013 (78 

FR 41042), the Department of Defense 

published a notice announcing a July 

25, 2013 meeting of the Defense 

Business Board. This notice announces 

that the Defense Business Board meeting 

scheduled for Thursday, July 25, 2013 is 

hereby cancelled. The Board will not 

have any completed studies to outbrief 

and deliberate on. Therefore, to 

conserve financial resources, the 

meeting is cancelled. The next Quarterly 

Board Meeting will be held on October 

17, 2013. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

Phyllis Ferguson, 

Phyllis.Ferguson@osd.mil, 703–695– 

7563 or Ms. Debora Duffy, 

Debora.Duffy@osd.mil, (703) 697–2168. 

Dated: July 16, 2013. 

Aaron Siegel, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison 

Officer, Department of Defense. 

[FR Doc. 2013–17369 Filed 7–18–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–P 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

Meeting of the National Commission 

on the Structure of the Air Force 

AGENCY: Director of Administration and 

Management, DoD. 

ACTION: Notice of Advisory Committee 

Meeting. 

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the 

Federal Advisory Committee Act 

(FACA) of 1972 (5 U.S.C., Appendix, as 

amended), the Government in the 

Sunshine Act of 1976 (5 U.S.C. 552b, as 

amended), and 41 CFR 102–3.150, the 

Department of Defense (DoD) announces 

that the following Federal advisory 

committee meeting of the National 

Commission on the Structure of the Air 

Force (‘‘the Commission’’) will take 

place. 

DATES: Date of Closed Meeting, 

including Hearing and Commission 

Discussion: Monday, July 22, 2013. 

ADDRESSES: 2521 South Clark Street, 

Suite 525, Crystal City, VA 22202, from 

8:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mrs. 

Marcia Moore, Designated Federal 

Officer, National Commission on the 

Structure of the Air Force, 1950 Defense 

Pentagon Room 3A874, Washington, DC 

20301–1950. Email: 

dfoafstrucomm@osd.mil. Desk (703) 

545–9113. Facsimile (703) 692–5625. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES