alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1104 

Recognizing the historic abolitionist events surrounding the Pearl, and 

honoring its legacy in American history. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 11, 2020 

Ms. NORTON submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the historic abolitionist events surrounding the 

Pearl, and honoring its legacy in American history. 

Whereas, on April 16, 1848, 77 slaves attempted to flee the 

District of Columbia and Alexandria, Virginia, on the 

Pearl, a schooner waiting for them in the Potomac River; 

Whereas, on April 14, 1848, three White men brought the 

ship to the District of Columbia, and Daniel Drayton, the 

captain and owner of the Pearl, chartered the schooner 

for $100 and arranged for the slaves’ travel; 

Whereas the escape was initiated by free Blacks Paul Jennings, who had been a slave of President James Madison, 

and Paul Edmonson; 

Whereas William Chaplin, a White abolitionist, assisted in 

connecting the slaves with Drayton; 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1104 IH 

Whereas abolitionist Gerrit Smith of New York financed the 

escape; 

Whereas 77 slaves, including men, women, and children, 

sailed on the Pearl down the Potomac River and then 

into Chesapeake Bay in pursuit of freedom; 

Whereas, on April 17, 1848, numerous slaveholders in the 

District of Columbia, realizing their slaves had disappeared, sent a posse of 35 men to seek the Pearl; 

Whereas the posse met the Pearl near Point Lookout, Maryland, and took the slaves and the ship back to the District of Columbia; 

Whereas slavery supporters formed a mob and lashed out at 

both the White abolitionists involved in the escape as well 

as free Blacks in the District of Columbia in the Washington Riot of 1848; 

Whereas the owners of the escaped slaves sold the escapees 

to slave traders who took them to New Orleans, Louisiana; 

Whereas two of the escapees were purchased and freed in an 

effort led by Henry Ward Beecher’s Plymouth Congregational Church of Brooklyn, New York; 

Whereas Drayton and two of the other ship workers were arrested for helping in the escape and were represented in 

court by Congressman Horace Mann; 

Whereas two of the men, including Drayton, after serving 

four years in prison, were released after being granted a 

pardon from President Millard Fillmore, based on a recommendation from Senator Charles Sumner; and 

Whereas the escape is said to be the single largest known 

slave escape in American history and to have inspired 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1104 IH 

Harriet Beecher Stowe in her writing the novel ‘‘Uncle 

Tom’s Cabin’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives honors 

2 the legacy of those furthering freedom involved in the 

3 Pearl incident and recognizes their importance to the his4 tory of the District of Columbia and throughout the coun5 try. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 49 (Thursday, March 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 11917]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6376]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[ID-957-1420-00]


Idaho: Filing of Plats of Survey; Idaho

    The plat of the following described land was officially filed in 
the Idaho State Office, Bureau of Land Management, Boise, Idaho, 
effective 9 a.m. March 5, 1997.
    The plat representing the dependent resurvey of portions of the 
north boundary, subdivisional lines, and of the subdivision of section 
5, and the survey of lots 12 and 15 in section 5, T. 32 N., R. 4 E., 
Boise Meridian, Idaho, Group 969, was accepted, March 5, 1997.
    This survey was executed to meet certain administrative needs of 
the Bureau of Land Management. All inquiries concerning the survey of 
the above described land must be sent to the Chief, Cadastral Survey, 
Idaho State Office, Bureau of Land Management, 1387 South Vinnell Way, 
Boise, Idaho, 83709-1657.

    Dated: March 5, 1997.
Duane E. Olsen,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor for Idaho.
[FR Doc. 97-6376 Filed 3-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GG-M
Table 1. Basic Features of State Renewable Energy Requirements as of December 31, 2003

Accepts | Out-of-
Part of | Initial Year] Beginning and Last Specified Existing | State Credit
State Deregulation | Enacted Requirements Capacity |_Supply_| Trading
Renewable Portfolio Standards
Arizona........ Yes 1996 0.2-1.1% of sales, 2001-2007 No Solaronly Yes
California No 2002 +1% of sales per year, to 20.0% by 2017 Yes Yes No
Connecticut . . Yes 2003 6.5-10.0% of generation, 2003-2010 Yes Yes Yes
Maine... . Yes 1997 30.0% of sales by 1999 Yes Yes Yes
Massachusetts. . Yes 1997 1.0-4.0% of sales, 2003-2009 No Yes Yes
Nevada ....... No 2001 5.0-15.0% of sales, 2003-2013; Yes Yes Yes
5% of requirements must be solar
New Jersey Yes 1999 3.0.6.5% of sales, 2001-2008 Yes Yes Yes
New Mexico No 2002 5,0-10.0% of sales, 2006-2011 Yes Yes Yes
Wisconsin No 1999 0.5-2.2% of sales, 2001-2011 Yes Yes Yes
Mandates
lowa. . No 1983 105 megawatts (no set date) No NS No
Minnesota .... . No 1994 1,125 megawatts wind by 2010 No Yes No
+125 megawatts biomass*
Texas... No 1999 400-2,000 megawatts, 2003-2009 No Yes Yes
Wisconsin . No 1997 50 megawatts by 2000 No No No
Goals
Hawaii . No 2001 9.0% of sales by 2010 Yes NA No
Mlinois.. . No 2001 15.0% of sales by 2020 NS No No
Minnesota? ... No 2003 1.0-10.0% of sales, 2005-2015 NS Yes Yes
Pennsylvania .. Yes 1998 Individual agreements with five utilities NS NS NS

Various dates, beginning in 2003. The original requirement for 125 megawatts of biomass capacity has been reduced.
Specific characteristics are being determined. See web site www.puc.state.mn.us, Docket 03-869.
NS = not specified in the State requirement. NA = not applicable.

Source: Energy Information Administration, Office of Integrated Analysis and Forecasting.
No. 11-11057.

#### Goodwin, aka Ross *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 99



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Martyn A. Powell, director and secretary/treasurer of Quad Metals Corporation (the Registrant) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

This Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Registrant for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

Date:  February 17, 2003

/s/Martyn  A. Powell

Martyn A. Powell

Secretary/Treasurer and Director
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order
Lansing, Michigan

December 15, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 129331 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 129331 COA: 252606 Oscoda CC: 02-000752-FH KEVIN MICHAEL MAY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e August 9, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

K ELLY , J., would grant leave to appeal.

p1208 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 15, 2005

Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 51 (Monday, March 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12609-12610]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6641]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary of Defense


Department of Defense Wage Committee; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to the provisions of section 10 of Public Law 92-463, the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act, notice is hereby given that closed 
meetings of the Department of Defense Wage Committee will be held on 
April 1, 1997; April 8, 1997; April 15, 1997; April 22, 1997 and April 
29, 1997; at 10:00 a.m. in Room A105, The Nash Building, 1400 Key 
Boulevard, Rosslyn, Virginia.
    Under the provisions of section 10(d) of Public Law 92-463, the 
Department of Defense has determined that the meetings meet the 
criteria to close meetings to the public because the matters to be 
considered are related to internal rules and practices of the 
Department of Defense and the detailed wage data to be considered were 
obtained from officials of private establishments with a guarantee that 
the data will be held in confidence.
    However, members of the public who may wish to do so are invited to 
submit material in writing to the chairman concerning matters believed 
to be deserving of the Committee's attention.

[[Page 12610]]

    Additional information concerning the meetings may be obtained by 
writing to the Chairman, Department of Defense Wage Committee, 4000 
Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000.

    Dated: March 12, 1997.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 97-6641 Filed 3-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM PLAINS
RESOURCES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE
30, 1996, AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS
ENDED JUNE 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                           5,605
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   71,049
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      4,385
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                81,039
<PP&E>                                         439,359
<DEPRECIATION>                                 147,285
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 393,982
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           89,464
<BONDS>                                        218,182
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,628
<OTHER-SE>                                      83,212
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   393,982
<SALES>                                        279,322
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               279,443
<CGS>                                          247,730
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  258,151
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,532
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,718
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (9,112)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             13,830
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (6,619)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,211
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .42
        

</TABLE>
Last First Company Address City ST Country Zip Phone Fax 

Brookman Douglas Public Solutions 5 Ingleside Avenue Baltimore MD USA 21228 (410) 719-0580 (410) 719-0Cook Keith Philips Lighting 1300 I Street, NW, Suite W703 Washington DC USA 12180 (202) 962-8Fernstrom Gary PG&E San Francisco CA USA 94177 (510) 530-1789 

Graves Linda Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington DC USA 20585-0121 (202) 586-1851 (202) 586-4Hansen Dain National Electrical Manufacturers 

Association

1300 North 17th Street, Suite 1752 Rosslyn VA USA 22209 (703) 841-3221 (703) 841-3

Lingard Robert Pacific Northwest National Laboratory 620 SW 5th Avenue, Suite 810 Portland OR USA 97204 (503) 417-7542 (503) 417-2Myer Michael Pacific Northwest National Laboratory One Cranberry Hill, 750 Marrett 

Road, Suite 202

Lexington MA USA 02421 (781) 869-1418 

O'Rourke Conan Lighting Research Center 21 Union Street Troy NY USA 12180 (518) 687-7182 (518) 687-7Placet Marylynn Pacific Northwest National Laboratory 901 D Street, SW, #900 Washington DC USA 20024 (202) 646-5249 (202) 646-5

Medal Halide Ballast Test Procedures Meeting - December 19, 2008

EERE-2008-BT-TP-0017 COMMENT 08
EXECUTIVE  GROUP  PERSONAL  EXCESS  LIABILITY  INSURANCE

Quick  Look

     This  program  represents  our  continuing  interest  in  your  financial
well-being and in allowing your focus to remain on the job without the potential
distraction  of  a  large  damage  claim.

     Executive  Group  Personal  Excess  Liability  Insurance  provides  up  to
$5,000,000  in  protection  from  this  potential  exposure.

     To  qualify  for  this  coverage,  you  must  meet  the general eligibility
requirements  for  Executive  Benefits  (as  defined  on  page  i).

In  Depth

     The  policy  will  provide you with $5,000,000 of Personal Excess Liability
coverage.

     The  policy  will  go into effect after all your primary Personal Liability
Insurance  is  exhausted  and  after  a  $250  deductible.

     Your  legal  defense  costs  are  paid  from  the  first  dollar.

     Coverage  is  provided  over  the  liability  limits  of  your homeowner's,
automobile,  watercraft  and  recreational  vehicle  policies.

Legal  Ease

     This  program  is  effective  only  when you maintain the following minimum
limits  of  liability  on  your  personal  liability  insurance:

<TABLE>

<CAPTION>



<S>                                        <C>
CATEGORY                                   LIABILITY - MINIMUM LIMITS
--------------------------------------  ---------------------------------
PERSONAL LIABILITY (homeowner's)           $100,000 per occurrence
for personal injury and property
damage

RECREATIONAL VEHICLES (unregistered        $100,000 bodily injury and
- not licensed for road use, such as       property damage each
mopeds, all-terrain vehicles, dune         occurrence
buggies, etc.)

EACH CAR, TRUCK, VAN OR                    $250,000/$500,000 bodily injury
MOTORCYCLE (registered vehicles)           and $100,000 property damage; or
                                           $300,000 single limit each
                                           occurrence (includes motorcycles
                                           and motorhomes)

WATERCRAFT                                 $100,000 per occurrence

UNINSURED MOTORISTS PROTECTION             $250,000/$500,000 bodily
                                           injury or $300,000 single
                                           limit occurrence

</TABLE>

NOTE:  The  examples  above  are  MINIMUM  requirements. You should not make any
changes  to  or  cancel  any  existing  policies  without  first consulting your
professional  insurance  agent  or  broker.

Costs  for  coverage  under  this  Plan  each year will be imputed income in the
amount  of  the  Company-paid  premium  on  your  behalf.  It will be taxable as
ordinary  income  to  you  that  year.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JANUARY 16, 2020

NO. 03-19-00482-CR

Yordanis Quintero-Gomez, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 21ST DISTRICT COURT OF BASTROP COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BAKER, AND KELLY

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the judgment adjudicating guilt rendered by the trial court. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error 

in the judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment adjudicating guilt.

Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
No. 11-10762.

#### Tooley *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE>
                                                                  Exhibit No. 11
                      HARDING LAWSON ASSOCIATES GROUP, INC.

                        COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                      (In thousands, except per share data)
                                   (Unaudited)

<CAPTION>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Three Months Ended       Six Months Ended
                                                                   November 30,            November 30,
                                                               1995         1994          1995         1994
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                             <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>  
PRIMARY
     Average shares outstanding                                 4,845        4,682        4,803        4,664
     Net effect of dilutive stock options
         based on the modified treasury stock
         method using the average market price                     26          111           34          145
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

         TOTAL COMMON SHARES USED IN
         PER SHARE CALCULATION                                  4,871        4,793        4,837        4,809
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Net income                                                  $959         $908       $1,894       $1,798
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Net income per common share                                $ .20        $ .19        $ .39        $ .37
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

</TABLE>
#### TIEN MINH NGUYEN, also known as Leon Tien Nguyen, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J. LEWIS, Deputy Director, Prison Health Care Services, in his individual and official capacities; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-55047

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted February 13, 2018 *

Filed February 23, 2018

Tien Minh Nguyen, Pro Se

Before: LEAVY, FERNANDEZ, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

California state prisoner Tien Minh Nguyen, aka Leon Tien Nguyen, appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging retaliation, a violation of substantive due process, and deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction under 28 .U-S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A for failure to state a claim. *Resnick v. Hayes,*213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir. 2000). We may affirm on any ground supported by the record. *Hartmann v. Cal. Dep’t of Corr. & Rehab.,*707 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2013). We affirm.

Dismissal of Nguyen’s action was proper because the magistrate judge correctly recommended that Nguyen had failed to state facts in his third amended complaint sufficient to state any plausible claims. *See Hebbe v. Pliler,*627 F.3d 338, 341-42 (9th Cir. 2010) (although pro se pleadings are to be liberally construed, a plaintiff must still present factual allegations sufficient to state a plausible claim for relief). The magistrate judge also provided notice of deficiencies each time Nguyen was granted leave to amend and correctly recommended that further leave to amend would be futile. *See Hartmann,*707 F.3d at 1129-30 (futility is a proper basis for denying leave to amend).

Nguyen’s motion for appointment of counsel, set forth in his opening brief, is denied.

Nguyen’s motion to file a corrected document attached to his informal brief (Docket Entry No. 23) is granted. The copy of the “Encounter Form” received on August 14,2017 is deemed filed.

Nguyen’s requests for further relief (Docket Entry Nos. 36, 39, 40) are denied.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
No. 12-5076.

#### Garcia *v.*Yates, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>   THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 EXTRACTED FROM THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 
 1996 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE- 
 MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
 BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                    33,753
<SECURITIES>                              16,502
<RECEIVABLES>                              1,702
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          52,954
<PP&E>                                    17,182
<DEPRECIATION>                            13,248
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            64,361
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      5,302
<BONDS>                                        9
<COMMON>                                      21
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                59,029
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              64,361
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           4,052
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             7
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (4,377)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (4,377)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                              (4,377)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              (0.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        

</TABLE>