alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard LUECK, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-13488 Non-Argument Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

(March 2, 2018)

Karin Bethany Hoppmann, U.S. Attorney Service—Middle District of Florida, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Stephen John Langs, Rosemary Cakmis, Donna Lee Elm, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Orlando, FL, for Defendant-Appellant

Richard Lueck, Pro Se

Before TJOFLAT, MARCUS and NEWSOM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Todd Doss, appointed counsel for Richard Lueck in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Lueck’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
No. 11-10602.

#### Rodriguez-Garcia *v.*United States.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 48 (Wednesday, March 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 11426]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6114]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. ER97-1640-000]


PECO Energy Company; Notice of Filing

March 6, 1997.
    Take notice that on February 13, 1997, PECO Energy Company (PECO) 
filed a Service Agreement dated February 5, 1997 with North American 
Energy Conservation, Inc. (NAEC) under PECO's FERC Electric Tariff 
Original volume No. 5 (Tariff). The Service Agreement adds NAEC as a 
customer under the Tariff.
    PECO requests an effective date of February 5, 1997, for the 
Service Agreement.
    PECO states that copies of this filing have been supplied to NAEC 
and to the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before March 17, 1997. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-6114 Filed 3-11-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 12-187.

#### Hatley *v.*United States.

C. A. Armed Forces. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                     EXHIBIT 11



                 STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                    Years Ended December 31,
                                          -----------------------------------------
                                              1996           1995           1994
                                          -----------------------------------------
<S>                                       <C>              <C>            <C>
Net income                                $ 2,602,000      4,260,000      1,916,000
                                          ===========      =========      =========

Weighted average number of common
     shares outstanding                     3,890,646      3,836,063      3,836,063
                                          ===========      =========      =========

Net income per share of common stock      $      0.67           1.11           0.50
                                          ===========      =========      =========
</TABLE>





Note:  Outstanding stock options are excluded from the computation as the
       effective dilution in earnings per share data is less than 3%.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MA Y 22, 2014

NO. 03

- 13

- 00858

- CV

M. Z. and R. B., Appellant s

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 428TH DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GO ODWIN, AND FIELD

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the order of termination signed by the tr i a l court on Dece mber 5, 2013

.

Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was no

reversible error in the trial court’s order . Therefore, the C ourt affirms the trial court’s order of

termination

. Because appellant s are indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs

is made.
EXHIBIT 21.1

                          SUBSIDIARIES OF REALCO, INC.
                             As of December 31, 2001


                                                 State of         Percent
Name of Subsidiary                               Organization     Owned
------------------                               ------------     -------
Charter Building & Development Corp.             New Mexico       100%
Equity Securities Investments, Inc.              Minnesota        100%
Financial Services Group, Inc.                   New Mexico       100%
First Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc.      New Mexico       100%
Great American Equity Corporation                New York         100%
P.H.S., Inc.                                     New Mexico       100%
P.H.S. Mortgage Co.                              New Mexico       49.99%
Real Estate Brokerage Services, Inc.             New Mexico       100%
Realco Construction, Inc.                        New Mexico       100%
Success Venture                                  New Mexico       50%
Schweizerische Eidgenossenschaft 

Confederation suisse 

Confederazione Svizzera 

Confederaziun svizra 

FOCA CH-3003 Bern 

Mr. Paul Gretch 

Director, Office for International Aviation 

Federal Department of the Environment, Transport, Energy and 

Communications DETEC 

Federal Office of Civil Aviation FOCA 

Aviation Policy and Strategy 

Office of the Assistant Secretary for Aviation and 

International Affairs 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

400 7th Street, S.W., Room 6402 

Washington, DC 20590 

USA 

Reference: 0/01/01 -02.02.187 

Your reference: 

Our reference: fjl 

Contact person: Laurence Fontana Jungo 

Tel. +41 31 323 04 10, Fax +41 31 325 92 12, Laurence.fontana-jungo@bazl.admin.ch 

IWgen, 27 February 2013 

Declaration of Reciprocity 

Dear Mr. Gretch 1 J.A.e ~ f'~ 

The Federal Office of Civil Aviation of Switzerland herewith declares, that it will consider applications 

by U.S. air carriers for approval to operate charters to and from Switzerland in accordance with the 

provisions of the Air Transport Agreement between the Swiss Confederation and the United States of 

America, dated 21 June 2010, and, for those charters not specified in the Annex to the Agreement, on 

the basis of comity and reciprocity. 

Yours sincerely 

V(.~~~ Marcel Zuckschwerdt 

Director 

Head Aviation Policy and Strategy 

\_

Chief 

Laurence 

Negotiator 

Fontana 

Air 

Jungo 

Services 

~ Agreements 

Federal Office of Civil Aviation 

MOhlestrasse 3, 3063 lttigen 

Postal address: CH-3003 Bern 

Tel. +41 31 325 80 39/40, Fax +41 31 325 80 32 

www .aviation.admin.ch
ARTHUR ANDERSEN




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
reports  in this Form  10-K, into the Company's  previously  filed  Registration
Statement File No.  33-65418,  Registration  Statement  333-03289,  Registration
Statement File No. 333-03303,  Registration  Statement File No.  333-32170,  and
Registration Statement File No. 333-53367.



/s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
--------------------------
Arthur Andersen LLP



Albuquerque, New Mexico
February 20, 2001
# C_2022119EN.01005201.xml

| 14.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 119/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 119/52

---

Action brought on 19 January 2022 — Vallegre v EUIPO — Joseph Phelps Vineyards (PORTO INSÍGNIA)

(Case T-33/22)

(2022/C 119/74)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Vallegre, Vinhos do Porto, SA (Sabrosa, Portugal) (represented by: E. Armero Lavie and G. Marín Raigal, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Joseph Phelps Vineyards LLC (St. Helena, California, United States)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark PORTO INSÍGNIA — Application for registration No 16 393 688

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 October 2021 in Case R 894/2021-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO and the intervener to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and the intervener to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council in the erroneous assessment of the conflicting marks.

---
Argued and submitted January 30,

affirmed July 19, 2017

#### In the Matter of the Compensation of Vicki Salvador, Claimant. Vicki SALVADOR, Petitioner, *v.*SAIF CORPORATION, and KHRG Employer, *Respondents.*

Workers’ Compensation Board

1404476; A159855

398 P3d 485

Julene M. Quinn argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioner.

Julie Masters argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents.

Before DeVore, Presiding Judge, and Garrett, Judge, and Duncan, Judge pro tempore.

PER CURIAM

Affirmed. *Brown v. SAIF,*361 Or 241, 391 P3d 773 (2017); *McDermott v. SAIF,*286 Or App 406, 398 P3d 964 (2017).
No. 11-10929.

#### Scott *v.*Curry, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# C_2021148EN.01002402.xml

| 26.4.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.4.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/24

---

Action brought on 26 February 2021 — Nevinnomysskiy Azot and NAK ‘Azot’ v Commission

(Case T-126/21)

(2021/C 148/34)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: AO Nevinnomysskiy Azot (Nevinnomyssk, Russia) and AO Novomoskovskaya Aktsionernaya Kompania NAK ‘Azot’ (Novomoskovsk, Russia) (represented by: P. Vander Schueren and E. Gergondet, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:

| — | annul Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/2100 of 15 December 2020, (1) as far as it applies to the applicants; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/2100 of 15 December 2020, (1) as far as it applies to the applicants;

| — | order the defendant to to pay the costs incurred by the applicants in relation to these proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to to pay the costs incurred by the applicants in relation to these proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants rely on a single plea in law, alleging that the defendant did not receive an expiry review request containing ‘sufficient evidence’ and therefore committed manifest errors of assessment, acted in breach of Articles 11(2), 11(5) and 5(3) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036, (2) and violated its duty to examine carefully and impartially all the relevant aspects of the individual case when it initiated the expiry review.

---

(1)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/2100 of 15 December 2020 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of ammonium nitrate originating in Russia following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of the Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 2020 L 425, p. 21).

(2)  Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union (OJ 2016 L 176, p. 21).

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             768
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   768
<PP&E>                                          13,869
<DEPRECIATION>                                (89,017)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,937
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,446
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           951
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,443,669)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,937
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    39
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   53,400
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,407
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (65,768)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (65,768)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (65,768)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.17)
        

</TABLE>
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

Notice of Public Hearing for 

Regional Haze State Implementation Plan

The Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) will hold a public 

hearing on the proposed Regional Haze State Implementation Plan (SIP) and the Best 

Available Retrofit Technology determinations contained therein. The hearing is 

scheduled for Wednesday, December 16, 2009 from 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon in the 

Multipurpose Room of the DEQ, 707 North Robinson Avenue, Oklahoma City, OK 

73102.

The DEQ prepared the proposed Regional Haze SIP to comply with the 

requirements contained in the federal Clean Air Act and 40 CFR Part 51, Subpart P, 

Protection of Visibility. 

All persons interested in these matters are invited to attend the public hearing

and/or submit comments. Persons planning to comment may submit a written statement

and/or additional information relevant to this matter for inclusion in the record of 

proceedings of the public hearing. The hearing officer may limit the length of oral 

presentations to allow all those who wish to provide oral comments an opportunity to do 

so. Written comments on the proposed Regional Haze SIP will be accepted prior to and 

at the hearing on December 16, 2009. 

The proposed implementation plan is available on the DEQ website at 

http://www.deq.state.ok.us/aqdnew/RulesAndPlanning/Regional_Haze/index.htm. 

Copies may also be obtained from the Department by contacting Cheryl E. Bradley, 

Environmental Programs Manager, at (405) 702-4100 or Cheryl.Bradley@deq.ok.gov .

Please send written comments regarding the proposed Regional Haze SIP to Ms. 

Bradley at Cheryl.Bradley@deq.ok.gov or Department of Environmental Quality, Air 

Quality Division, P.O. Box 1677, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73101-1677, ATTN: Cheryl 

E. Bradley. Comments may be submitted by fax to the Air Quality Division, ATTN: 

Cheryl E. Bradley, at (405) 702-4101.

Should you plan to attend but have a disability and need accommodation, please 

notify the Air Quality Division three (3) days in advance at (405)702-4216. For the 

hearing impaired, the TDD relay number is 1-800-522-8506 or 1-800-722-0353, for TDD 

machine use only.
EX-10.9






 Exhibit 10.9 
  


			
	



	  	10/5/18

 Patrik Sebastian Jeanmonod 
 Re:
Chief Financial Officer 
 Dear Patrik, 
 CYTEK BIOSCIENCES
INC. (“Cytek” or the “Company”) is pleased to offer you the position of Chief Financial Officer (CFO). Your duties are captured in the attached Job Description. 

You will report to Dr. Wenbin Jiang, CEO of Cytek Biosciences. You will work in the facility located at 46107 Landing Parkway, Fremont, CA 94538. Company
may change your position, duties, and work location from time to time as it deems necessary. 
 Your annual compensation will be $230,000 less
payroll deductions and all required withholdings. You will be paid semi-monthly and you will be eligible for the following standard Company benefits: 
  

			
	Medical	  	Flexible account (HSA, FSA)
	Dental	  	12 days of vacation,
	Vision	  	6 days sick leave, and
	Life insurance	  	9 holidays
	401K plan with company match	  	


 In your role as CFO, the company will recommend that the board grant you the right to purchase 254,000 shares of stock
options as part of Cytek’s employee incentive plan, subject to the terms and conditions of Cytek stock option plan and vesting over four years. 
 The
company may modify compensation and benefits from time to time as it deems necessary. 
 As a Cytek employee, you will be expected to abide by Company rules
and regulations and sign and comply with the Proprietary Information and Inventions Agreement which prohibits unauthorized use or disclosure of Company proprietary information. Normal working hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday. 
 We expect that you will start performing the duties of your new position on October 15, 2018. You may terminate your
employment with Company at any time and for any reason whatsoever simply by notifying the Company. Likewise, the Company may terminate your employment at any time and for any reason whatsoever, with or without cause or advance notice. This at-will employment relationship cannot be changed except in writing signed by a Company officer. 
 The employment terms
in this letter supersede any other agreements or promises made to you by anyone, whether oral or written. As required by law, this offer is subject to satisfactory proof of your right to work In the United States. 














			
	



	  	10/5/18

 Please sign and date this offer and return it to me. We look forward to a productive and enjoyable working relationship. 

Sincerely, 
  

			
	 /s/ Wenbin Jiang



			
	Name:	 	Dr. Wenbin Jiang
	Title:	 	CEO


			
	Cytek Biosciences

  

					
	Accepted:	 		 	 Date:

			
	 /s/ Patrik Jeanmonod
  
	 		 	 10/7/2018
EXHIBIT 32.1



     CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350


I, Bruce M. Goldberg, President and Chief Executive Officer of All American
Semiconductor, Inc., hereby certify, to my knowledge:

         (1)      that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of All American
                  Semiconductor, Inc. for the quarterly period ended on June 30,
                  2006 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
                  date hereof at File No. 0-16207 (the "Report") fully complies
                  with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
                  applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      that the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                  in all material respects, the financial condition and results
                  of operations of All American Semiconductor, Inc.

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.




Date:  August 14, 2006                     /s/ BRUCE M. GOLDBERG
                                           -----------------------------------
                                           Bruce M. Goldberg
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                    
|---------------------------------------------
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                      
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of ILX Resorts Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the three months ending March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I (We), Joseph P. Martori, Chief Executive Officer, and Margaret M. Eardley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company./s/ Joseph P. Martori_____________________             
Joseph P. Martori
Chief Executive Officer
May 15, 2006



/s/ Margaret M. Eardley___________________Margaret M. Eardley
Chief Financial Officer
May 15, 2006
#### ATLAS IP, LLC, Appellant v. ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC., St. Jude Medical S.C., Inc., Pacesetter, Inc., Biotronik, Inc., Appellees

2017-1395

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 13, 2018

Matthew Topic, Loevy <& Loevy, Chicago, IL, argued for appellant.

Matthew A. Smith, Smith Baluch LLP, Washington, DC, argued for all appellees.

Jeffrey M. Olson, SOA Legal, Los An-geles, CA, for appellee Biotronik, Inc. Also represented by Samuel N. Tiu, Sidley Austin LLP, Los Angeles, CA.

(Prost, Chief Judge, Clevenger and Linn, Circuit Judges).

*1025JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and.Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
No. 12-5154.

#### Rojas *v.*Kirkland, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.