alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 7 (Friday, January 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1484-1485]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-608]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart Q During 
the Week Ending January 3, 1997

    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience 
and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart 
Q of the Department of Transportation's Procedural Regulations (See 14 
CFR 302.1701 et. seq.). The due date for Answers, Conforming 
Applications, or Motions to modify Scope are set forth below for each 
application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the

[[Page 1485]]

application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the 
adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate 
cases a final order without further proceedings.
    Docket Number: OST-96-2040.
    Date filed: December 31, 1996.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: January 28, 1997.
    Description: Application of Delta Air Lines, Inc., pursuant to 49 
U.S.C. Sections 41102 and 41108, and Subpart Q of the Regulations, 
applies for renewal of its certificate of public convenience and 
necessity for Route 526, issued by Order 87-5-5, served May 8, 1987, 
and renewed by Order 92-6-21 (served June 12, 1992), authorizing Delta 
to engage in foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail 
between the terminal points Cincinnati, Ohio and London (Gatwick), 
England.
Paulette V. Twine,
Chief, Documentary Services.
[FR Doc. 97-608 Filed 1-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 2 (Friday, January 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 441]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-66]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
[STB Docket No. AB-481X]


South Plains Lamesa Railroad, Ltd.--Abandonment Exemption--in 
Dawson and Lynn Counties, TX

AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board.

ACTION: Notice of exemption.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Board exempts from the prior approval requirements of 49 
U.S.C. 10903 the abandonment by South Plains Lamesa Railroad, Ltd., of 
49.06 miles of rail line between milepost 5.00 near Slaton and milepost 
54.06 near Lamesa, in Dawson and Lynn Counties, TX, subject to standard 
labor protective conditions.

DATES: Provided no formal expression of intent to file an offer of 
financial assistance (OFA) has been received, this exemption will be 
effective on February 3, 1997. Formal expressions of intent to file an 
OFA under 49 CFR 1152.27(c)(2) <SUP>1 must be filed by January 13, 
1997; petitions to stay must be filed by January 21, 1997; requests for 
a public use condition conforming to 49 CFR 1152.28(a)(2) must be filed 
by January 23, 1997; and petitions to reopen must be filed by January 
28, 1997.

    \1\ See Exempt. of Rail Abandonment--Offers of Finan. Assist., 4 
I.C.C.2d 164 (1987).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

ADDRESSES: Send pleadings referring to STB Docket No. AB-481X to: (1) 
Surface Transportation Board, Office of the Secretary, Case Control 
Branch, 1201 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20423, and (2) 
Petitioner's representative: William R. Power, 5840 West Interstate 20, 
260 Cordovan Park, Arlington, TX 76017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beryl Gordon, (202) 927-5660. [TDD for 
the hearing impaired: (202) 927-5721.]

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Additional information is contained in the 
Board's decision. To purchase a copy of the full decision, write to, 
call, or pick up in person from: DC News & Data, Inc., Room 2229, 1201 
Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20423. Telephone: (202) 289-
4357/4359. [Assistance for the hearing impaired is available through 
TDD services: (202) 927-5721.]

    Decided: December 23, 1996.

    By the Board, Chairman Morgan, Vice Chairman Simmons, and 
Commissioner Owen.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-66 Filed 1-2-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION

File Name: 14a0461n.06

No. 13-1706

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

JAROSLAW WASKOWSKI, )

)

Plaintiff-Appellant, )

) ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED

) STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

v. ) THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF

) MICHIGAN

)

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE ) MEMORANDUM

INSURANCE COMPANY, ) O P I N I O N

)

Defendant-Appellee. )

)

BEFORE: NORRIS, CLAY, and KETHLEDGE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM. Plaintiff Jaroslaw Waskowski was involved in a car accident, and sued 

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company in Michigan state court after State Farm 

terminated his benefits. State Farm removed the action to federal court where, after a five-day 

trial, the jury returned a verdict that Waskowski was in fact injured in the car accident, but that 

State Farm owed no additional benefits beyond the amount it had already paid. Waskowski 

appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to amend the judgment to add damages or, in the

alternative, his motion for a new trial on damages.

The panel has had the opportunity to consider the arguments advanced by the parties and 

to conduct our own independent review of the record on appeal. In this case, the district court 

issued an Opinion and Order which explains in detail the analysis behind the court’s denial of 

plaintiff’s motions. Waskowski v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., No. 11-CV-13036, 2013 WL 
Waskowski v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co.

No. 13-1706

1774696 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 25, 2013) (Page ID 1636). We agree with the reasoning of the district 

court and affirm on that basis.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
No. 11-10934.

#### Adefumi *v.*City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

CESAR TELLEZ-HERNANDEZ,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 12-30059

D.C. No. 4:11-cr-00080-BLW

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Idaho

B. Lynn Winmill, Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 18, 2013** 

Before: TALLMAN, M. SMITH, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Cesar Tellez-Hernandez appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges his jury-trial conviction and 24-month sentence for being a deported

alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to

FILED

JUN 25 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 12-30059

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Tellez-Hernandez’s counsel has filed a

brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw

as counsel of record. We have provided Tellez-Hernandez the opportunity to file a

pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has

been filed. 

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. 

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED.
March 24 , 2016

Gerardo Rios

Chief, Region 9 Air Permits Office

Air Division AIR

- 3

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, CA 94105

Subject : Collins Pine Chester PSD Permit Modification

Dear Mr. Rios :

On behalf of Collins Pine , Sierra Research is requesting that the following language be

inserted into the modified PSD permit:

D. Fuel Usage

Collins Pine shall burn only wood, bark, and wood residues in boiler No.

4 , except during startup, when small amounts (less than 10 gallons per

event) of California diesel fuel may by burned

.

Boi ler 4 cogeneration unit burns diesel fuel during startup to maintain flame stabilization.

No change in any of the permit emission limits, hourly or otherwise, is sought. No

additional recordkeeping or reporting requirements are required or proposed for PSD

purposes.

Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions.

Sincerely,

Steve Hill

cc: Jess Brown, Collins Pine

Joe Fish, NSAQMD 

## sierra

research

A Trinity Consultants Company

1801 J Street

Sacramento, CA 95811

Tel: (916) 444

- 6666

Fax: (916) 444

- 8373

Ann Arbor, MI

Tel: (734) 761

- 6666

Fax: (734) 761

- 6755
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000818257
<NAME> JOHN HANCOCK REALTY INCOME FUND-II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                       3,550,837
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  160,351
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,603,303
<PP&E>                                      24,396,994
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,367,414
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              39,629,999
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          562,408
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  39,067,591
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                39,629,999
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,336,318
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  384,713
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,776,854
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,776,854
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,776,854
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.68
        

</TABLE>
# C_2022359EN.01009301.xml

| 19.9.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 359/93 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.9.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 359/93

---

Action brought on 29 July 2022 — Mocom Compounds v EUIPO — Centemia Conseils (Near-to-Prime)

(Case T-472/22)

(2022/C 359/113)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Mocom Compounds GmbH & Co. KG (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: J. Bornholdt, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Centemia Conseils (Angevillers, France)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘Near-to-Prime’ — Application No 16 448 524

Proceedings before EUIPO: Invalidity proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 May 2022 in Case R 2178/2021-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | amend the contested decision to the effect that Decision No 47 561 C of the Invalidity Division of 12 November 2021 is annulled and the application for a declaration of invalidity in respect of EU trade mark No 16 448 524 is dismissed; |
| --- | --- |

—

amend the contested decision to the effect that Decision No 47 561 C of the Invalidity Division of 12 November 2021 is annulled and the application for a declaration of invalidity in respect of EU trade mark No 16 448 524 is dismissed;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
2022 EAVS Data Brief: Utah EAVS Jurisdictions:

29 

 Voter Registration 

Active Reg. Voters as of Nov. 8, 20221 

1,690,442 

Reg. Forms Received2* 

246,112 

Total Confirmation Notices Sent3* 

150,848 

Voters Removed from Reg. Rolls4* 

57,975 

Source of Registration Applications5 

Motor Vehicle Dept. 14.7% 

Online 12.2%

In Person 7.0% 

Other 5.2% 

Mail, Email, Fax 2.2% 

 Voting and Turnout 

Voters Participating By Mode6 

7 Turnout 

47.7% 

In-Person 

Election Day 

56,264 

5.2% 

Mail 

970,274 

90.3% 

In-Person 

Early 

12,942 

1.2% 

Other 

12,639 

1.2% 

Total Voting Locations8: 116 

Total Poll Workers9: 751 

Election Technology 

Percentage of Jurisdictions Using...10 

96.6%

Scanners

86.2% 

Electronic

Poll 

Books 

75.9% 

Ballot 

Marking 

Devices 

24.1% 

DREs with 

VVPAT 

0.0% 

DREs w/o 

VVPAT 

0.0% 

Hand 

Counting 

 Mail Ballots 

• 1,703,702 mail ballots transmitted11 

• 59.0% of transmitted mail ballots returned by voters12 

• 99.3% of returned mail ballots counted13 

• 1.5% of returned mail ballots rejected14 

• Conducted all-mail election statewide15 

• Allowed drop boxes16 

• Allowed ballot curing17 

 Election Audits18 

-- Access audit 

-- Ballot design audit 

Ballot reconciliation ✔ audit 

Compliance/ -- procedural audit 

✔ Eligibility audit 

-- Legal audit 

Logic and accuracy ✔ testing 

Post-election ✔ tabulation audit 

✔ Other 

Notes 

EAVS data and reports may be downloaded at www.eac.gov 

/research-and-data/datasets-codebooks-and-surveys. 

Responses of “Does not apply,” “Data not available,” and “Valid 

skip” are shown as zeroes or dashes. Percentages may not sum 

to 100% because of missing data or rounding. 

* Close of registration for 2020 

general election to close of 

registration for 2022 general 

election. 

1 A1b of EAVS. 

2 A3a of EAVS. 

3 A8a of EAVS. 

4 A9a of EAVS. 

5 Mail, Email, Fax is A4a/A3a. 

In Person is A4b/A3a. Online is 

A4c/A3a. Motor Vehicle Dept. is 

A4d/A3a. Other is the sum of 

A4e–A4l/A3a. May not sum to 

100% because of missing data. 

6 In-Person Election Day is F1b. 

Mail is F1d+F1g. In-Person Early 

is F1f. Other is F1c+F1e+F1h. 

7 F1a of EAVS divided by citizen 

voting age population (CVAP). 

8 D2a of EAVS. 

9 D7a of EAVS. 

10 F3a–f, F5a–F9a of EAVS; 

number of jurisdictions that 

responded “Yes” divided by

number of jurisdictions in 

state/territory. 

11 C1a of EAVS. 

12 C1b/C1a of EAVS. 

13 C8a/C1b of EAVS. 

14 C9a/C1b of EAVS. 

15 Q17 and Q17a of Policy 

Survey. 

16 Q19 of Policy Survey. 

17 Q20 of Policy Survey. 

18 Q36 of Policy Survey. See 

survey questionnaire for full 

definitions of each type of 

audit.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of

TIMOTHY ROBERT HOUGH

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 2674 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

Board File No. C1-16-744

Attorney Registration No. 40898

(Philadelphia)

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 22nd day of November, 2019, upon consideration of the Joint 

Petition to Temporarily Suspend an Attorney, the Joint Petition is granted, and Timothy 

Robert Hough is placed on immediate temporary suspension until further definitive action 

by this Court. See Pa.R.D.E. 208(f)(1). It is further ordered that Respondent shall comply 

with all the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217.

This Order constitutes an imposition of public discipline pertaining to 

confidentiality. See Pa.R.D.E. 402.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-6922

KAIMEL GLENN, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

 v. 

ISAH TESSEMA, Doctor, 

 Defendant - Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District 

Judge. (1:08-cv-02304-WDQ) 

Submitted: September 29, 2009 Decided: October 7, 2009 

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Kaimel Glenn, Appellant Pro Se. Philip Melton Andrews, Katrina 

J. Dennis, KRAMON & GRAHAM, PA, Baltimore, Maryland, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Kaimel Glenn appeals the district court’s order 

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Glenn v. Tessema, No. 1:08-cv-02304-WDQ (D. Md. Mar. 19, 

2009). We deny Glenn’s numerous pending motions: for 

appointment of counsel, for $150,000 in punitive damages and the 

removal of Dr. Isah Tessema, for $50,000 in punitive damages and 

the removal of Nurse Barnhart, for $75,000 in damages and the 

removal of April Baker, and for $250,000 in punitive damages 

from CMS, a private contractor of medical services. We deny as 

moot Glenn’s motions for summary judgment and injunctive relief 

pending appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 54 (Thursday, March 20, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 13370]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-7106]



[[Page 13370]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Navy


Notice of Closed Meeting of the Board of Visitors to the United 
States Naval Academy

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (5 U.S.C. App.2), notice is hereby given that the Board of Visitors 
to the United States Naval Academy will meet on March 17 and 18, 1997, 
at the United States Naval Academy, Annapolis, MD, at 8:30 a.m. This 
meeting will be closed to the public.
    The purpose of the meeting is to make such inquiry as the Board 
shall deem necessary into the state of morale and discipline, the 
curriculum, instruction, physical equipment, fiscal affairs, and 
academic methods of the Naval Academy. During this meeting inquiries 
will relate to the internal personnel rules and practices of the 
Academy, may involve ongoing criminal investigations, and include 
discussions of personal information the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. 
Accordingly, the Under Secretary of the Navy has determined in writing 
that the special committee meeting shall be closed to the public 
because the meeting will be concerned with matters as outlined in 
section 552(b)(2), (5), (6), and (7) of title 5, United States Code. 
Due to a delay in Administrative Processing the normal 15 days notice 
requirement could not be met.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONCERNING THIS MEETING CONTACT: Lieutenant 
Commander Adam S. Levitt, U.S. Navy, Secretary to the Board of 
Visitors, Office of the Superintendent, United States Naval Academy, 
Annapolis, MD 21402-5000, telephone number (410) 293-1503.

    Dated: March 11, 1997.
Donald E. Koenig, Jr.,
LCDR, JAGC, USN, Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-7106 Filed 3-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>         5

<MULTIPLIER>      1



<S>               <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>     3-MOS

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           MAY-31-2000

<PERIOD-END>                                Nov-30-1999

<CASH>                                          1307190

<SECURITIES>                                    8390456

<RECEIVABLES>                                    352832

<ALLOWANCES>                                          0

<INVENTORY>                                       96654

<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               10429318

<PP&E>                                          1117927

<DEPRECIATION>                                   775441

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 12020623

<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            833067

<BONDS>                                               0

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0

<PREFERRED>                                           0

<COMMON>                                          30567

<OTHER-SE>                                     10714750

<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   12020623

<SALES>                                         1767705

<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                1767705

<CGS>                                            533056

<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   1243281

<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0

<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0

<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    0

<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  116347

<INCOME-TAX>                                       3000

<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               86347

<DISCONTINUED>                                        0

<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0

<CHANGES>                                             0

<NET-INCOME>                                      86347

<EPS-BASIC>                                         .03

<EPS-DILUTED>                                       .03




</TABLE>
# C_2022284EN.01004702.xml

| 25.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 284/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 284/47

---

Action brought on 24 May 2022 — Fun Factory v EUIPO — I Love You (love you so much)

(Case T-306/22)

(2022/C 284/65)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Fun Factory GmbH (Bremen, Germany) (represented by: K.-D. Franzen, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: I Love You, Inc. (Lewes, Delaware, United States)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark love you so much — Application for registration No 18 157 726

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 March 2022 in Case R 1464/2021-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision and grant the applicant’s appeal; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision and grant the applicant’s appeal;

| — | order the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to bear the costs incurred. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to bear the costs incurred.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---