alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                         5
<LEGEND>

         The  schedule   contains   summary   financial   information  from  the
         Registrant's  consolidated condensed financial statements as of and for
         the six months ended June 30, 1997, and is qualified in its entirety by
         reference to such consolidated financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                    0000818074
<NAME>             ALL AMERICAN SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                  1,000
       
<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          208
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                39,643
<ALLOWANCES>                                  1,509
<INVENTORY>                                  66,918
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            109,685
<PP&E>                                        9,260
<DEPRECIATION>                                4,178
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              119,209
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        41,742
<BONDS>                                      54,132
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                        199
<OTHER-SE>                                   23,136
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                119,209
<SALES>                                     130,370
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            130,370
<CGS>                                       101,034
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               101,034
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             24,580
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                679
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            2,456
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               1,621
<INCOME-TAX>                                    697
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             924
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                    924
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   .05
        

</TABLE>
# C_2022340EN.01005301.xml

| 5.9.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 340/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.9.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 340/53

---

Action brought on 13 July 2022 — International British Education XXI v EUIPO — Saint George’s School (IBE ST. GEORGE’S)

(Case T-438/22)

(2022/C 340/72)

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: International British Education XXI SL (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: N. Fernández Fernández-Pacheco, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Saint George’s School SL (Fornells De La Selva, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for EU figurative mark IBE ST. GEORGE’S — Application No 18 020 505

Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 May 2022 in Case R 2226/2020-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | grant EU trade mark No 18 020 505 IBE ST. GEORGE’S in respect of all of the goods and services applied for; |
| --- | --- |

—

grant EU trade mark No 18 020 505 IBE ST. GEORGE’S in respect of all of the goods and services applied for;

| — | order the intervener and the defendant, if applicable, to pay the costs incurred in all the proceedings before EUIPO and the General Court. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the intervener and the defendant, if applicable, to pay the costs incurred in all the proceedings before EUIPO and the General Court.

Plea in law

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
<PAGE>   
 
                                                        EXHIBIT 23
 
                    PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC AND GAS COMPANY
 
                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
 
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration
Statements Nos. 33-49367, 33-50199, 33-51309 and 33-52435 of Public
Service Electric and Gas Company on Forms S-3 of our report dated
February 14, 1996 appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Public Service Electric and Gas Company for the year ended December
31, 1995.
 
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
 
Parsippany, New Jersey
February 22, 1996
No. 11-11085.

#### Dodd *v.*Board of Education, Brunswick County Schools.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**Section II B Industrial Sites Controlled by Others**

1. **Poly olefin Processors**  : Product will be blended with other materials such as polyethylene or polypropylene in an extruder . W orkers will typically transfer the NCS to a feeder at point 

## A and then either directly into an extruder to mix with a polyolefin such as polyethylene or to a blender to mix with other substances before extrusion. The modified polyolefin will be packaged at point 

## B **.** Wo rker exposure : would be during transfer a t point 

## A, a small amount of dust could escape. Transfer would take ~ 1 hr per batch. Exposure would be 1 hr/day for 1 worker. An air filter would typically be used to control dust at point 

## C
**.** Wo rker exposure could occur when this filter is changed. Ex posure would probably be less than four hours per day for 1 -2 workers per site and occur less than 50 times per year. Environmental Release : **1** : Drums will contain a small amount of product once empty ( estimated to be less than 6 kg per container) whic h will need to be disposed of properly. An air filter would typically be used to control dust at **2 .**  Release to a solid waste processing facility would occur when this filter is changed. Less than 0.5 kg/batch is expected to be released to the filter. N

Fe Mixer/

Ext Packaging **A**

**B C**  **1**
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6048

MUHAMMAD ABD SALEEM EURY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia

Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District

Judge. (CA-01-208)

Submitted: June 12, 2003 Decided: June 17, 2003

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Muhammad Abd Saleem Eury, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Muhammad Eury appeals the district court’s order accepting a

magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss his 28 U.S.C. § 2254

(2000) petition for failure to exhaust state remedies. When, as

here, a district court dismisses a § 2254 petition solely on

procedural grounds, a certificate of appealability will not issue

unless the petitioner can demonstrate both “(1) ‘that jurists of

reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid

claim of the denial of a constitutional right’ and (2) ‘that

jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district

court was correct in its procedural ruling.’” Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 684 (4th Cir.) (quoting Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000)), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 941 (2001). We have independently

reviewed the record and conclude that Eury has not made the

requisite showing. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 123 S. Ct. 1029, 1039

(2003). 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
THEODORER. KULONGOSKI

Governor

October 13, 2009

Ms. Michelle L. Pirzadeh, Acting Regional Administrator

US Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10

1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101

RE: Recommendation for Designation of Lead Air Quality Areas

Dear Ms. Pirzadeh:

This letter provides my recommendation for attainment and nonattainment air quality

designations in the State of Oregon for the revised Lead National Ambient Air Quality Standard

(NAAQS) as required by Federal regulation, and requested by you.

The State of Oregon, with EPA's concurrence, discontinued all ambient air lead

monitoring after 2001. This decision came after considering that no lead concentrations

approaching the Standard had been measured for several years, and no increase in sources oflead

emissions were anticipated. As a result, no ambient lead data, consistent with EPA's proposed

new monitoring network siting criteria and data collection requirements is available anywhere in

Oregon. This means there is insufficient data at this time to evaluate attainment of the more

protective revised lead NAAQS. Therefore, I recommend that the entire State of Oregon be

designated as Unclassifiable with respect to this Standard.

The State of Oregon is aware of the requirement to implement source-oriented ambient

air lead monitoring by January 1, 2010, and will have that monitoring in place by that date. The

recent addition of Section 105 Federal funds to the Department of Environmental Quality budget

will make this possible. In addition, a population-oriented monitor will be operating in Portland,

as required, by January 2011. Data acquired from these monitors will be used to determine

attainment status.

If you have any questions, please contact David Collier, Manager, Air Quality Planning,

Air Quality Division, Department of Environmental Quality, at (503) 229-5177.

7JiaA~ THEODORE R. KULO~KI Governor

TRK:mc:jb

STATE CAPITOL, 900 COURT STREET NE, SALEM OR 97301-4047 (503) 378-3111 FAX (503) 378-6827

WWW.GOVERNOR.OREGON.GOV
# C_2022084EN.01004902.xml

| 21.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 84/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 84/49

---

Action brought on 6 January 2022 — FFI Female Financial Invest v EUIPO — MLP Finanzberatung SE (Financery)

(Case T-7/22)

(2022/C 84/69)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: FFI Female Financial Invest GmbH (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: M. Gramsch, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: MLP Finanzberatung SE (Wiesloch, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: Application for registration of EU trade mark Financery — Application No 18 041 007

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 October 2021 in Case R 1820/2020-5.

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
EXHIBIT 12

                   THE QUAKER OATS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
                                       
               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES


(Dollars in Millions)                                       Year Ended
                                                  Dec. 31, 1996   Dec. 31, 1995
                                                 
Earnings:                                                    
  Income Before Income Taxes                           $415.6        $1,220.5
  Add Fixed Charges - net of capitalized interest       118.2           147.3

    Earnings                                           $533.8        $1,367.8
                                                             
                                                             
Fixed Charges                                                
  Interest on Indebtedness                             $112.3        $  139.5
  Portion of rents representative of the                      
    interest factor                                      12.1            12.1
  Fixed Charges                                        $124.4        $  151.6
                                                             
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges (a)                   4.29            9.02
                                                             
                                                             


(a)  For purposes of computing the ratio of earnings to fixed charges, earnings
represent pretax income from continuing operations plus fixed charges  (net  of
capitalized  interest).  Fixed charges represent interest (whether expensed  or
capitalized)  and one-third (the portion deemed representative of the  interest
factor) of rents.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 5136

_____________________________
D EXTER F ARMER , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. Angela C. Dempsey , Judge

. February 27, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
L EWIS , W ETHERELL , and W INOKUR , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Dexter Farmer, pro se
, A ppellant.

Ashley B. Moody , Attorney General, and Quentin Humphrey, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
# Certification of the
Chief Executive Officer and Vice President  Finance

Solely for the purpose of complying
with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, we, the undersigned Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Vice President 
Finance of Northland Cranberries, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify, based on
our knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months
ended May 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

|/s/ John Swendrowski | /s/ Nigel J. Cooper
|-------------------- | -------------------
|John Swendrowski     | Nigel J. Cooper    
|July 15, 2005        | July 15, 2005
Exhibit 10.42
                                                                 
                                                                 
                                
                          Amendment to
                     Reynolds Metals Company
           Restricted Stock Plan for Outside Directors


          At a meeting held on November 21, 1997, the board of
directors of Reynolds Metals Company adopted the following
resolution:

          RESOLVED, that Section 4.04(b) of the Reynolds
     Metals Company 1996 Nonqualified Stock Option Plan is
     hereby amended effective December 1, 1997, by deleting
     the reference to "the Rights Agreement dated November
     23, 1987" and inserting in its place a reference to
     "the Rights Agreement dated December 1, 1997."
# C_2022171EN.01004301.xml

| 25.4.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.4.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/43

---

Action brought on 7 March 2022 — Coinbase v EUIPO — Coinbase Global (coinbase)

(Case T-126/22)

(2022/C 171/59)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Coinbase, Inc. (San Francisco, California, United States) (represented by: A. Nordemann, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Coinbase Global OÜ (Tallinn, Estonia)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark coinbase — Application for registration No 18 090 762

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 December 2021 in Case R 1097/2021-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
Exhibit 99.2

 

CERTIFICATION

 

	Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Harold's Stores, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 3, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:	June 17, 2003					/s/ Jodi L. Taylor			
Name:  Jodi L. Taylor

Title:	Chief Financial Officer

 

 

	The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 53 (Wednesday, March 19, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 13260]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6879]



[[Page 13259]]

_______________________________________________________________________

Part IV

General Services Administration

Department of Defense

National Aeronautics and Space Administration
_______________________________________________________________________



Reissue of Federal Acquisition Regulation; Notice

Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 53 / Wednesday, March 19, 1997 / 
Notices

[[Page 13260]]



GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION


Notice of Reissue of the Federal Acquisition Regulation

    The following information is for all interested users of the 
Federal Acquisition Regulation:

To: All Federal Departments and Agencies
From: Edward C. Loeb, Director, Federal Acquisition Policy Division
Subject: Procedure for Ordering the 1997 Edition of the Federal 
Acquisition Regulation Through the Government Printing Office

    The Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 1997 Reissue will be 
distributed in May 1997. A reissue is a revised basic publication, 
i.e., a new edition with old Federal Acquisition Circular numbers 
deleted and pages renumbered. The FAR will be dated to reflect the date 
of the reissuance, but the effective date of the overall FAR will 
remain April 1984.
    To obtain copies of the reissue, please have your printing office 
prepare a printing and binding requisition, Standard Form 1, and 
deliver to the Government Printing Office (GPO). Those agencies who do 
not submit their requirement by April 1, 1997, will not be permitted to 
order by rider requisition; agencies will have to purchase their 
requirements from the Superintendent of Documents.
    On your requisition, state Federal Acquisition Regulation, 1997 
Reissue, in two volumes. Your order will ride Program 493-S for GSA 
Requisition Number 7-89025, GPO Jacket Number 424-496. All production 
costs will be pro-rated to participating Federal departments and 
agencies. Bureaus, Commissions, and regional offices of agencies must 
submit requisitions through their headquarters office only. GPO will 
bill each agency directly in accordance with existing procedures. The 
cost is approximately $10 per set.
    Those agencies who do not submit their requirement by April 11, 
1997, will have to purchase their copies from the Superintendent of 
Documents at a significantly increased cost per copy. To avoid this 
additional cost, be sure your order is sufficient for all new requests. 
Keep in mind that, while each agency must determine its own needs, all 
contracting personnel must maintain a copy of the FAR.
    If you have any questions, please call the FAR Secretariat, at 
(202) 501-4755.

    Dated: March 13, 1997.
Jeremy F. Olson,
Acting Director, Federal Acquisition Policy Division.
[FR Doc. 97-6879 Filed 3-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-EP-M
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report
of Duke Energy Indiana, Inc. (Duke Energy Indiana) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James E. Rogers, Chief
Executive Officer of Duke Energy Indiana, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Duke Energy Indiana.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    JAMES E.
ROGERS                                
|James E. Rogers Chief Executive
Officer March 29, 2007