alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>         5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains a summary of financial information extracted from the
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet and Condensed Consolidated Statement of
Operations and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statement.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           AUG-2-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                MAY-3-1997
<CASH>                                          21,122
<SECURITIES>                                   151,055
<RECEIVABLES>                                   66,833
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,395
<INVENTORY>                                    490,062
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               785,155
<PP&E>                                         738,139
<DEPRECIATION>                                 287,035
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,336,430
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          333,119
<BONDS>                                        360,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           499
<OTHER-SE>                                     540,215
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,336,430
<SALES>                                      1,712,582
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,712,582
<CGS>                                        1,155,034
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,561,237
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                22,361
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                14,461
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,439
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                130,906
<INCOME-TAX>                                    53,671
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             77,235
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    77,235
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.05
        

</TABLE>
EX-10.26



 Exhibit 10.26 

REVANCE THERAPEUTICS, INC. 

2014 MANAGEMENT BONUS PROGRAM 
 Upon the
recommendation of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Revance Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”), the Company’s Board of Directors on March 17, 2014, approved the corporate objectives for the Company’s
named executive officers relating to the Company’s 2014 cash performance bonus program (the “2014 Bonus Program”). 
 The 2014 Bonus Program
is designed to reward, through the payment of annual cash bonuses, the Company’s executive officers for the Company’s performance in meeting key corporate objectives for 2014 and for the Company’s named executive officers other than
the Chief Executive Officer, individual performance in meeting specified corporate goals for the year. The actual cash bonus awarded in any year, if any, may be more or less than each executive’s annual target bonus, and shall be subject to
approval by the Compensation Committee or the Board of Directors. For the Company’s named executive officers, the target bonuses, and whether or not a bonus is paid in any year, is within the discretion of the Compensation Committee. 

The 2014 corporate objectives relate to product development milestones, including successful completion of the Company’s ongoing RT002 Phase 1/2
glabellar lines clinical trial (30% weighting) and achievement of positive efficacy results from the planned RT001 Phase 3 crow’s feet lines clinical trial in the United States (40% weighting) and the achievement of specified financing
objectives (30% weighting). 
 Our Chief Executive Officer’s cash bonus under the 2014 Bonus Program will be entirely based on the achievement of the
2014 corporate objectives. The cash bonus for all other named executive officers shall be based on the achievement of his or her individual performance goals (25% weighting) and on the achievement of the 2014 corporate objectives (75% weighting).
The named executive officers’ actual bonuses may exceed 100% of target in the event performance exceeds the predetermined goals.
# C_2022276EN.01000401.xml

| 18.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 276/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 276/4

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Köln (Germany) lodged on 8 April 2022 — Criminal proceedings against BW

(Case C-246/22)

(2022/C 276/05)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Amtsgericht Köln

Parties to the main proceedings

Concerned party: BW

Other parties: Staatsanwaltschaft Köln, Bundesamt für Güterverkehr

Question referred

Is the transport of empty containers to or from the loading or the unloading point an inseparable part of the transport of the loaded containers such that the transport of the empty containers benefits from the privileged treatment afforded to the transport of the full containers in so far as those empty containers are exempt from the cabotage rules in the context of combined transport?

---
Hennion & Walsh, Inc. S-6/A


Exhibit 4.1


 


 



THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


240 Greenwich
Street, 22W Floor, New York, NY 10286


 


 


 


July 15, 2021


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


SmartTrust 525 (the “Fund”)


 


Dear Sirs:


The Bank of New York Mellon
is acting as trustee for the Fund, consisting of the unit investment trust (the “Trust”) included in the Registration
Statement relating to the Fund. We enclosed a list of the securities to be deposited in the Trust on the date hereof. The prices indicated
therein reflect our evaluation of such securities as of close of business on July 14, 2021, in accordance with the valuation method set
forth in the applicable Standard Terms and Conditions of Trust and Trust Agreement. We consent to the reference to The Bank of New York
Mellon as the party performing the evaluations of the Trust securities in the Registration Statement (No. 333-255335) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission with respect to the registration of the sale of the Units of the Trust and to the filing of this consent as an
exhibit thereto.


 


Very truly yours,


 


/s/ GERARDO CIPRIANO


Gerardo Cipriano


Vice President
No. 11-10999.

#### Jones *v.*Florida Department of Corrections.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1155 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 1155

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                    September 29, 2020.
Whereas the United States is founded on the principle that our Government 
        derives its power from the consent of the governed and that the people 
        have the right to change their elected leaders through elections;
Whereas our domestic tranquility, national security, general welfare, and civil 
        liberties depend upon the peaceful and orderly transfer of power; and
Whereas any disruption occasioned by the transfer of the executive power could 
        produce results detrimental to the safety and well-being of the United 
        States and its people: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) reaffirms its commitment to the orderly and peaceful transfer of 
        power called for in the Constitution of the United States; and
            (2) intends that there should be no disruptions by the President or 
        any person in power to overturn the will of the people of the United 
        States.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
No. 11-556.

#### Vance v. Ball State University et al.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari granted.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 8 (Monday, January 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1776-1777]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-724]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Health Resources and Services Administration


Advisory Council; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Public Law 92-463), announcement is made of the 
following National

[[Page 1777]]

Advisory body scheduled to meet during the month of February 1997.

    Name: National Advisory Council on the National Health Service 
Corps.
    Date and Time: February 6-9, 1997.
    Place: Radisson Hotel, La Jolla, 3299 Holiday Court, La Jolla, 
California 92037.
    The meeting is open to the public.
    Agenda: Agenda items include updates on the National Health 
Service Corps program, meetings with current and former NHSC 
providers; presentations on managed care, academic-community 
educational linkages, and the future role of the Corps; and meetings 
of NHSC workgroups on new environment strategies, health system 
linkages, and mission coalition building.
    The opening meeting will be held on Thursday, February 6 from 
6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. and will include an orientation session for 
new Council members. On friday and Saturday, meetings will begin at 
9:00 a.m. and conclude around 7:00 p.m. Sunday's meeting will begin 
at 9:00 a.m. and adjourn around noon.
    The meeting is open to the public. Anyone requiring information 
regarding the subject Council should contact Ms. Jewel Davis, 
National Advisory Council on the National Health Service Corps, 
Health Resources and Services Administration, 8th floor, 4350 East 
West Highway, Rockville, Maryland 20857, Telephone (301) 594-4144.
    Agenda Items are subject to change as priorities dictate.

    Dated: January 7, 1997.
J. Henry Montes,
Director, Office of Policy and Information Coordination, HRSA.
[FR Doc. 97-724 Filed 1-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-15-P
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 19

- 11380 Conference Calendar

**United States of America,** Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus **Jose Guadalupe Hernandez**

**- Saldivar,**  Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:18

- CR

- 603

- 1

Before **Dennis, Costa,** and **Engelhardt,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Guadalupe Hernandez

- Saldivar has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Herndandez

- Saldivar has not filed

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 16, 2021 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-11380 Document: 00515902162 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/16/2021No. 19

- 11380

2 a response. We have reviewed counsel’s bri ef and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the **APPEAL IS DISMISSED**

. See **5th Cir. R.** 42.2

. Case: 19-11380 Document: 00515902162 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/16/2021
#### Raheem L. JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lieutenant CURRY, Lieutenant/Building Supervisor; Lieutenant Dyson, Lieutenant/Building Supervisor; Lieutenant Griffen, Lieutenant/Building Supervisor; Correctional Officer Benz, Pod Officer; Correctional Officer Hudson, Pod Officer; Correctional Officer Latif, Pod Officer; Correctional Officer Myrick, Pod Officer; Lieutenant Allen, Lieutenant/Building Supervisor; Ms. Witt, Grievance Coordinator; Grant, Unit Manager; Tameka Jones, Building Counselor; Ms. Wil*313liam, Mental Health Counselor; Nurse Marland, Medical Department; Nurse Thigpen, Medical Department; Nurse Thweatt, Medical Department, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 18-6077

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 13, 2018

Decided: March 16, 2018

Raheem L. Jones, Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Raheem L. Jones appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint as barred by the applicable statute of limitations. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Jones v.*Curry, No. 1:17-cv-01216-TSE-MSN (E.D. Va. Dec. 21, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
11 TH C OURT OF A PPEALS

E ASTLAND

, T EXAS

J UDGMENT

Ivan Levario Ortega, * From the 244 th District

Court of Ector County,

Trial Court No. C

- 38,803

.

Vs. No. 11

- 15

- 00141

- CR * September 17 , 2015

The State of Texas

, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court h as considered Ivan Levario Ortega ’s motion to dismiss this

appeal and concludes that the motion should be granted. Therefore, in

accordance with this court’s opinion, the appe al is dismissed.
No. 11-10505.

#### Williams *v.*Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction.

Sup. Ct. Ark. Certiorari denied.
# nostimls
# C_2022303EN.01005601.xml

| 8.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 303/56 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 303/56

---

Action brought on 22 June 2022 — Cassa Centrale v EUIPO — Bankia (BANQUÌ)

(Case T-368/22)

(2022/C 303/72)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Cassa Centrale Banca — Credito Cooperativo Italiano SpA (Trento, Italy) (represented by: J. Graffer, G. Locurto and A. Ottolini, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Bankia, SA (Madrid, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark BANQUÌ — Application for registration No 17 889 900

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 April 2022 in Case R 1318/2021-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision declaring the signs dissimilar and admitting the opposed application to registration; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision declaring the signs dissimilar and admitting the opposed application to registration;

| — | order the adverse parties to bear the costs of the present proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the adverse parties to bear the costs of the present proceedings.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
On appellant’s petition for reconsideration filed January 24, and respondent’s response to petition for reconsideration filed January 27,

reconsideration allowed, former disposition (282 Or App 774, 387 P3d 381 (2016)) adhered to June 21, 2017

#### Michael MIGIS, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, *Plaintiff-Respondent Cross-Appellant, v.*AUTOZONE, INC., a Nevada corporation, *Defendant-Appellant Cross-Respondent.*

Multnomah County Circuit Court

071113531; A150540

398 P3d 360

Roy Pulvers and Holland & Knight LLP for petition.

A.E. Bud Bailey, J. Dana Pinney, and Bailey, Pinney & Associates, LLC, for response.

Before Ortega, Presiding Judge, and DeVore, Judge, and Garrett, Judge.

*358PER CURIAM

Defendant, AutoZone, Inc., petitions for reconsideration of our decision, *Migis v. AutoZone, Inc.,*282 Or App 774, 387 P3d 381 (2016), concerning the disposition of its appeal. Defendant argues that concepts of waiver or invited error should preclude a new trial on the off-the-clock claim penalties and compel a defense verdict on that issue as a matter of law. We allow the petition for reconsideration to state that we reject those arguments. Without further discussion, we adhere to our original decision.

Reconsideration allowed; former disposition adhered to.
United States Environmental Protection Agency

Region IX

75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, CA 94105-3901

June 20, 2011

Transmittal of EPA Rule Review Comments

To: Jong Hoon Lee, South Coast Air Quality Management District

jhlee@aqmd.gov

Mike Guzzetta, California Air Resources Board

mguzzett@arb.ca.gov

From: Andrew Steckel, Rulemaking Office Chief

steckel.andrew@epa.gov

Re: South Coast AQMD Proposed Rule 1133.3 (Greenwaste Composting), June 16, 2011

We are providing comments based on our preliminary review of the draft rule identified above. Please 

direct any questions about our comments to me at (415) 947-4115 or to Nancy Levin at (415) 972-3848.

1. The June 7, 2011 draft of this rule required a cover within three hours of compost pile 

formation. Section (d)(2)(A) of the June 16 revision expands the time period to 24 hours. 

We are concerned that allowing 24 hours to cover the compost may significantly increase 

VOC emissions. Appendix III-3 of SCAQMD's draft staff report suggests that significant 

emissions may occur within the first 24 hours of compost pile formation. Please reconsider 

a shorter time period to cover the compost or explain why that is not appropriate. 

2. Sections (d)(2)(B) and (C) require compost watering before turning. Please accompany 

these requirements with a method to ensure appropriate moisture. See, for example, the 

"squeeze test" described in the analogous rule under development by the San Joaquin 

Valley APCD. 

3. Please consider whether any revisions to SCAQMD's previous emission projections are 

appropriate in light of relaxations reflected in the most recent draft rule. For example, the 

draft staff report estimates that covering the top third of a windrow after each turning in the 

22-day active cycle reduces 53% of VOC emissions. It also estimates a 24% control 

efficiency for water application prior to each turning in the 22-day cycle. The District 

should clarify whether these control estimates are still appropriate. Similarly, if the 

emission reductions projected for the June 7 draft rule (0.9 tons/day VOC) rely on a 

three-hour cover requirement that is significantly relaxed, SCAQMD should revise the 

analysis of emission impacts. SCAQMD should also revise the emission estimates that 

reflect the likely higher emissions from foodwaste.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 970 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 970

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To direct the Secretary of the Interior to develop a plan for the 
   removal of the monument to Robert E. Lee at the Antietam National 
                  Battlefield, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Robert E. Lee Statue Removal Act''.

SEC. 2. REMOVAL AND DISPOSAL OF MONUMENT.

    Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this 
Act, the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Director of the 
National Park Service, shall remove and appropriately dispose of the 
Monument to General Robert E. Lee at the Antietam National Battlefield.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 10, 2020.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
116th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 970

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To direct the Secretary of the Interior to develop a plan for the 
   removal of the monument to Robert E. Lee at the Antietam National 
                  Battlefield, and for other purposes.
```
No. 11-10935.

#### Brumaire *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# C_2022244EN.01004701.xml

| 27.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 244/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 244/47

---

Action brought on 12 May 2022 — Freixas Montpelt and Others v Committee of the Regions

(Case T-260/22)

(2022/C 244/63)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: David Freixas Montpelt (Berchem-Sainte-Agathe, Belgium), Gustavo Lopez Cutillas (Woluwé Saint Pierre, Belgium), Valeria Schirru (Brussels, Belgium), Svetlozar Andreev (Brussels) (represented by: L. Levi and P. Baudoux, lawyers)

Defendant: Committee of the Regions

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the General Court should:

| — | declare the present action admissible and well founded; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare the present action admissible and well founded;

| — | accordingly, annul the list of officials eligible for promotion in the 2021 promotion exercise, in so far as that list does not include the names of Mr Freixas Montpelt at grade AST5, Mr Lopez Cutillas at grade AD6, Ms Schirru at grade SC2 and Mr Andreev Svetlozar at grade AD10; |
| --- | --- |

—

accordingly, annul the list of officials eligible for promotion in the 2021 promotion exercise, in so far as that list does not include the names of Mr Freixas Montpelt at grade AST5, Mr Lopez Cutillas at grade AD6, Ms Schirru at grade SC2 and Mr Andreev Svetlozar at grade AD10;

| — | in so far as necessary, annul the defendant’s decision of 11 February 2022 rejecting the applicants’ complaints; |
| --- | --- |

—

in so far as necessary, annul the defendant’s decision of 11 February 2022 rejecting the applicants’ complaints;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs in their entirety. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs in their entirety.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants rely on two pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging that the decision of 16 June 2021 is unlawful in that it infringes Article 45(1) of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging that the decision of 16 June 2021 is unlawful in that it infringes Article 45(1) of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union.

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging that the decision of 16 June 2021 is unlawful in that it infringes the principle of non-discrimination. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging that the decision of 16 June 2021 is unlawful in that it infringes the principle of non-discrimination.

---