P u rsuan t t o 5 T H C IR
. R. 47. 5, t h e courtha s det erm i n ed that t h i s opi n i on * shou l d n otbe pu bl i shed an d i s not preceden texcept u n der t h e l i m i t ed c i r c um s t anc e s s e tf

o r t h i n 5 T H C IR
. R. 47. 5. 4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 60536 Su m m ar y Cal endar

CHA RL OT T E V W OOD S Pl ai nt i f f

- Appe l l ant

v. S OC I AL S EC URI T YA DMI NI S T RA T I ON D efen da n t

- A pp el l ee

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f o rt he So ut he r n Di s t r i c to f M i s s i s s i ppi U SD C N o. 2: 07- C V

- 137

B ef ore W IE N E R , ST E W A R T , an d C L E M E N T , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R I A M: * C h arl ot t e V

. W oods seeks l eave to p ro ce ed i n f orm a pa u peri s ( IFP ) on a p p e a l fr o m th e d is tr ic t c o u r t’s d is m is s a l w ith o u t p r eju d ic e o f h e rciv il s u it i n volv i n g a soci alsec u ri t y m att er. Th e di st ri ctcourtdi sm i ssed her act i on be c aus e s he fai l e d t o o be y i t s o r de r s t hat s he pa y t he f i l i ng fe e a nd t hat , a f

t e rs he p a id th e fe e , sh e e ffe c tu a te p r o c e s s o n th e d e fe n d a n ts
. S eeF e d

. R

. C iv . P

. 4 ( m)
a n d 4 1 (b ). United States Court of App eals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D Ma rc h 11, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I ClerkN o. 08- 60536

2 W o o d s h a s s h o w n th a t s h e is a p a u p e rfo rp u r p o s e s o f th is a p p e a l. S ee Carson v. Pol ley , 68 9 F

. 2 d 56 2 , 58 6 ( 5 th C i r. 19 8 2 ). W e d i sp en se, h ow ev er, w i th fu rth e r br iefin g a n d , for th e re a so n s n o te d b e low , a ffi rm th e d istr ic t c o u r t ’s j u d gm en t. D i sm i ssal s pu rsuan tt o R u l es 4 and 41 are revi ew e d fo r a bu se of d is c r e tio n . S ee L ong v. S i m m on s, 7 7 F .3 d8 7 8 , 8 7 9 (5 th C ir . 1 9 9 6 ); Fourni e rv. Text ron Inc. , 7 7 6 F. 2 d 5 3 2 , 5 3 4 ( 5 t h Ci r . 1 9 8 5 )

. I f t he e f fe c t of a di sm i ss al
w ith o u t p r eju d ic e p r e v e n ts o ra r g u a b lym a yp r e v e n t t h e p la in tiff fr o m a g a in rai si n g t h e dism iss e d cl ai m s because of t h e app l i cabi l i t y of a st atute of lim ita tio n s , th e d is m is s a l m a yo p e r a te a s a d is m is s a l w ith p r eju d ic e . Long , 77 F .3 d a t 8 8 0
. Ita p p e a r s th a t t h e d is tr ic t c o u r t’s d is m is s a l o f W o o d s ’ s s u it
o p e r a te s a s a d is m is s a l w ith p r eju d ic e . S ee 4 2 U .S .C

. § 4 0 5 (g). W e w i l laf

f i r m di sm i ss al s w i t h prej udi c e o nl y w hen ( 1) t here i s a c l ear recor d of

del ay or contum aci ou s c on du ct by t h e pl ai n t i f f, an d ( 2) t h e di st ri ctcourt has e xp r e s s l y de t e r m i ne d t hatl e s s e rs anc t i o ns w o ul d no tpr o m ptdi l i ge nt pr o s e c ut i o n, o rt he r e c o r d s ho w s t hatt he di s t r i c tc o u r te m p l o y e dl e s s e rs anc t i o ns th a t p r o v e d to b e fu tile

. L o ng, 77 F. 3d at880. Thi s c our thas expl ai ned t hat provi di n g t h e pl ai n t i f f w i t h second and t h i rd cha n ces t o com pl y w i t h an or d er c o u n ts a s a le s s e rs a n c tio n . S e e Ca ll ip v . Ha r r is Co u n ty C h il d W e lf a r eD e p ’t , 757 F .2 d 1 5 1 3 , 1 5 2 1 ( 5 th C ir . 1 9 8 5 ); see als o H us ley v . St at eof Tex as , 929 F. 2d 168, 1 7 1 (5t h C ir. 1 9 9 1 ). I n t hi s c as e , W o o ds t w i c e fai l e d t o o be y t he di s t r i c t c o ur t ’ s o r de r t o pa y t he filin gfe e . A lth o u g h s h e is a p r o s e p la in tiff, s h e co n c e d e s th a t s h e is w e ll edu cat e d, a nd t he r e i s no r e as o n t o b e l i e ve t hats he di d no tund e r s t andt he
c o ur t ’ s o r de r s o rw ar ni ng t hatherca s e w o ul d be di s m i s s e d i f she di d no tpa y t he fee . M or eo ver , f

ourm ont hs pas se d af t ert he di st r i c tc our t ’ s l as tor dert hat W o o ds pa y t he f

i l i ng fe e , a nd W o o ds f i l e d no t hi ng w i t h t he di s t r i c tc o ur t
. The in fo r m a t io n a v a il a b le t o th e d is t r ic tc o u r ta tth e ti m e th a titd is m is s e dW o o d s ’s
ac t i o n was t hats he w as c ho o s i ng t o g o t o s c ho o li ns t e ad of purs ui ng ga i nf ulN o. 08- 60536

3 em pl oym en tan d that she ha d u n en cum bered p ropert y w o r t h $ 25 , 00 0 (her hom e) and$ 17 , 00 0 (he r c ar)

. Al t ho ugh W o o ds w as g ive n t he o ppo r t uni t y t o c o r r e c ta ny i n c o r r e c t i n f

o r m a t i o n i n h e r I FP m o t i o n s a n d a f f i d a v i t s a n d t o c o r r e c t a ny i nco r r ec tas sum pt i ons m ad e b y th e di st r i c tc our tw i t h re spe c tt o he rf i nanci al
s i t uat i o n, s he di d no tdo s o . Ac c o r di ngly, g ive n t he i nf o r m at i on k n ow n t o t he di st ri ctcourtat t h e t i m e i tdi sm i ssed her sui t , i t s di sm i ssalw as n otan abu se of di s c r e t i o n. AF F I RMED; MOTI ON G RA NT ED

.