alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2023063EN.01002202.xml

| 20.2.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.2.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/22

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Itä-Suomen hovioikeus (Finland) lodged on 2 December 2022 — Endemol Shine Finland Oy

(Case C-740/22)

(2023/C 63/29)

Language of the case: Finnish

Referring court

Itä-Suomen hovioikeus

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Endemol Shine Finland Oy

Questions referred

| 1. | Does an oral transfer of personal data constitute processing of personal data within the meaning of Article 2(1) and Article 4(2) of the General Data Protection Regulation? (1) |
| --- | --- |

1.

Does an oral transfer of personal data constitute processing of personal data within the meaning of Article 2(1) and Article 4(2) of the General Data Protection Regulation? (1)

| 2. | Can public access to official documents be reconciled with the right to protection of personal data pursuant to the General Data Protection Regulation, in the manner referred to by Article 86 of the regulation, by allowing information on criminal convictions or offences of a natural person to be obtained from a court’s register of persons without restriction where a request is made to transfer the information orally to the applicant? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Can public access to official documents be reconciled with the right to protection of personal data pursuant to the General Data Protection Regulation, in the manner referred to by Article 86 of the regulation, by allowing information on criminal convictions or offences of a natural person to be obtained from a court’s register of persons without restriction where a request is made to transfer the information orally to the applicant?

| 3. | Is it relevant for the answer to Question 2 whether the applicant is a company or a private individual? |
| --- | --- |

3.

Is it relevant for the answer to Question 2 whether the applicant is a company or a private individual?

---

(1)  Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (OJ 2016 L 119, p. 1).

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000818257
<NAME> JOHN HANCOCK REALTY INCOME FUND-II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       3,542,481
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  106,769
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,649,250
<PP&E>                                      19,258,208
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,941,451
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,560,683
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          586,009
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  24,974,674
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                25,560,683
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               824,499
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  214,210
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               175,663
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                434,626
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            434,626
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   434,626
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.17
        

</TABLE>
#### LAWRENCE GRANT *v.*COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

(AC 34735)

Sheldon, Keller and Bishop, Js.

Argued January 23—

officially released February 11, 2014

Petitioner’s appeal from the Superior Court in the judicial district of Tolland, *Shapiro, J.*

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed.
# C_2022198EN.01005301.xml

| 16.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 198/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 198/53

---

Action brought on 14 March 2022 — Netherlands v Commission

(Case T-137/22)

(2022/C 198/77)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicant: Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented by: and M. Bulterman and J. Langer, acting as Agents)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

| — | annul the Commission decision bearing reference number Ares (2022) 99942 refusing the request of the Kingdom of the Netherlands for an extension by 4 years in addition to the 8-year period rule for the recovery of unduly paid amounts resulting from the FresQ case, and |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the Commission decision bearing reference number Ares (2022) 99942 refusing the request of the Kingdom of the Netherlands for an extension by 4 years in addition to the 8-year period rule for the recovery of unduly paid amounts resulting from the FresQ case, and

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging that the contested decision is based on an erroneous assumption that the recovery procedure in the FresQ case is not yet finalised. |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging that the contested decision is based on an erroneous assumption that the recovery procedure in the FresQ case is not yet finalised.

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging that the Commission makes an erroneous application of the third subparagraph of Article 54(2) of Regulation No 1306/2013 in so far as it assumes that the exceedance of the 8-year period for the recovery of the unduly paid amounts resulting from the FresQ case is attributable to the Netherlands. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging that the Commission makes an erroneous application of the third subparagraph of Article 54(2) of Regulation No 1306/2013 in so far as it assumes that the exceedance of the 8-year period for the recovery of the unduly paid amounts resulting from the FresQ case is attributable to the Netherlands.

---
**Exhibit
      21**





**Subsidiaries
      of the Registrant**





1.  RRF
      Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership.





2.  Yuma
      Hospitality Properties, Ltd., an Arizona limited partnership.





3.  Tucson
      Hospitality Properties, Ltd, an Arizona limited partnership.





4.  Ontario
      Hospitality Properties Limited Partnership, an Arizona limited
      partnership.





5.  Tucson
      St. Mary’s Suite Hospitality LLC, an Arizona limited liability
      company.





6.  Albuquerque
      Suite Hospitality LLC, an Arizona limited liability company.





7.  InnSuites
      Hotels, Inc., an Arizona corporation.
No. 11-10624.

#### Smith *v.*Parker, Warden.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-10864.

#### Holton *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### PPC BROADBAND, INC., DBA PPC, FKA John Mezzalingua Associates, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee v. CORNING OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS RF, LLC, Defendant-Appellant

2017-1347

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 13, 2018

*1023J. Michael Jakes, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellee. Also represented by Jose M. Recio; Robert L. Burns, II, Reston, VA; Justin A. Hendrix, Palo Alto, CA; John D. Cook, Douglas J. Nash, Barclay Damon, LLP, Syracuse, NY; John T. Gutkosiu, Boston, MA.

Kimball Richard Anderson, Winston & Strawn LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for defendant-appellant. Also represented by Howard I. Shin, New York, NY; Mark S. Davies, Katherine M. Kopp, Orrick, Her-rington & Sutcliffe LLP, Washington, DC; Elizabeth Moulton, Menlo Park, CA; Daniel A. Rubens, New York, NY; Joseph P. Lavelle, DLA Piper US LLP, Washington, DC.

Clyde Moody Siebman, Siebman, Burg, Phillips & Smith, LLP, Sherman, TX, for amicus curiae Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

(Prost, Chief Judge, Mayer and Reyna, Circuit Judges).

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
##### 



EXHIBIT 23 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8
(Registration Nos. 33-38614 and 333-41352) of Raven Industries, Inc. of our report dated March 24,
2005 relating to the financial statements, managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting, which appears in the Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated March
24, 2005 relating to the financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 31, 2005
# C_2022303EN.01005401.xml

| 8.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 303/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 303/54

---

Action brought on 18 June 2022 — Bazhaev v Council

(Case T-362/22)

(2022/C 303/69)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Musa Yusopovich Bazhaev (Moscow, Russia) (represented by: T. Bontinck, A. Guillerme and T. Payan, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/582 (1) of 8 April 2022, in so far as it includes the applicant’s name in the annex to Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP of 17 March 2014; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/582 (1) of 8 April 2022, in so far as it includes the applicant’s name in the annex to Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP of 17 March 2014;

| — | annul Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/581 (2) of 8 April 2022, in so far as it includes the applicant’s name in the annex to Council Regulation (EU) No 2014/269 of 17 March 2014; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/581 (2) of 8 April 2022, in so far as it includes the applicant’s name in the annex to Council Regulation (EU) No 2014/269 of 17 March 2014;

| — | order the Council to pay provisional damages of EUR 1 000 000 for the non-material harm suffered by the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council to pay provisional damages of EUR 1 000 000 for the non-material harm suffered by the applicant;

| — | order the Council to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea, alleging infringement of the rights of the defence and of the right to effective judicial protection. |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea, alleging infringement of the rights of the defence and of the right to effective judicial protection.

| 2. | Second plea, alleging manifest error of assessment as regards the grounds given by the Council. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea, alleging manifest error of assessment as regards the grounds given by the Council.

| 3. | Third plea, alleging infringement of the principle of proportionality and of equal treatment. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Third plea, alleging infringement of the principle of proportionality and of equal treatment.

| 4. | Fourth plea, alleging infringement of the applicant’s fundamental rights. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Fourth plea, alleging infringement of the applicant’s fundamental rights.

---

(1)  Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/582 of 8 April 2022 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (OJ 2022 L 110, p. 55).

(2)  Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/581 of 8 April 2022 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (OJ 2022 L 110, p. 3).

---
Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION III

1650 Arch Street

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029

September 24, 2010

Ms. Joyce E. Epps, Director

Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection

Bureau of Air Quality

Rachel Carson State Office Building

P.O. Box 2063

Harrisburg, PA 17105-2063

Dear Ms. Epps:

On July 23, 2010, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a revision 

to the Pennsylvania State Implementation Plan (SIP) from the Pennsylvania Department of 

Environmental Protection (PADEP). This revision pertains to amendments to the Allegheny

County Health Department (ACHD) Rules and Regulations, Article XXI, Air Pollution Control 

which, incorporates the Control Techniques Guidelines (CTG) issued by EPA for control of 

volatile organic compounds (VOC) from large appliance and metal furniture; flat wood paneling; 

and paper, film, and foil surface coating processes in Allegheny County. The SIP revision also 

includes revisions to existing regulations for surface coating processes in Section 2105.10 and 

related definitions in Section 2101.20. EPA has determined that the submittal is administratively

and technically complete, and is reviewing it to prepare a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPR).

If members of your staff have any questions, they may direct them to Irene Shandruk, 

Office of Air Program Planning, at 215- 814-2166. She is the principal contact for this 

rulemaking. 

Sincerely, 

/s/

David Arnold for

 Diana Esher, Director

 Air Protection Division 

cc: Arleen Shulman, PADEP

 Stephen Hepler, PADEP

 James Thompson, ACHD
Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474
|     |                                                                                                                       |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|     |                                                                                                                                                      |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|                      |
|----------------------|
|                      |  |
|                 | /s/ Thomas C. Elliott |
| Date: March 18, 2014 | Thomas C. Elliott |
|                 | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Provident Bankshares Corporation (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Gary N. Geisel, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Gary N. GeiselGary N. GeiselChief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board


August 18, 2008
Exhibit 35.1





SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT





HARLEY-DAVIDSON CREDIT CORP.





I, James Darrell Thomas, Vice President, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary of Harley-Davidson Credit Corp. (“HDCC”), certify that:





(i) a review of HDCC’s activities for the period from January 28, 2015 (the closing date of the Harley-Davidson Motorcycle Trust 2015-1 transaction subject to the requirements of Regulation AB) through December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”) and of HDCC’s performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of January 1, 2015 (the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”) among Harley-Davidson Motorcycle Trust 2015-1, Harley-Davidson Customer Funding Corp., HDCC, and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., has been made under my supervision; and





(ii) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, HDCC has fulfilled in all material respects all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement throughout the Reporting Period.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate in the name of and behalf of HDCC this 28th day of March, 2016.











By:/s/ James Darrell ThomasJames Darrell ThomasVice President, Treasurer and Assistant SecretaryHarley-Davidson Credit Corp.
# C_2022340EN.01004601.xml

| 5.9.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 340/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.9.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 340/46

---

Action brought on 30 June 2022 — Good Services v EUIPO — ITV Studios Global Distribution (EL ROSCO)

(Case T-382/22)

(2022/C 340/64)

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Good Services ltd. (Sliema, Malta) (represented by: L. Alonso Domingo, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: ITV Studios Global Distribution Ltd (London, United Kingdom)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark EL ROSCO — EU trade mark No 13 265 021

Proceedings before EUIPO: Invalidity proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 April 2022 in Case R 957/2021-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision and confirm the registration of EU trade mark No 13 265 021 for all the goods and services for which it was granted or, in the alternative, refer the case back to the Board of Appeal of EUIPO for further consideration following directions from the Court; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision and confirm the registration of EU trade mark No 13 265 021 for all the goods and services for which it was granted or, in the alternative, refer the case back to the Board of Appeal of EUIPO for further consideration following directions from the Court;

| — | order the defendant to bear the costs of these proceedings and the previous proceedings before EUIPO. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to bear the costs of these proceedings and the previous proceedings before EUIPO.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of the case-law interpreting that article and the concept of bad faith, and the point at which bad faith is to be assessed. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of the case-law interpreting that article and the concept of bad faith, and the point at which bad faith is to be assessed.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 925 Received in Senate (RDS)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 925

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 21, 2019

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To extend the authorization of appropriations for allocation to carry 
 out approved wetlands conservation projects under the North American 
          Wetlands Conservation Act through fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``North American Wetlands Conservation 
Extension Act''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    Section 7(c) of the North American Wetlands Conservation Act (16 
U.S.C. 4406(c)) is amended by striking ``not to exceed--'' and all that 
follows through paragraph (5) and inserting ``not to exceed $60,000,000 
for each of fiscal years 2020 through 2024.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 20, 2019.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```