alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 6150** 

TERRANCE GRIFFIN , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.
ELIZABETH HOLCOMB; RACHEL LADDAGA; GREALIN FRAZIER; WILLIAM BRIGHTHARP; JOHN/JANE DOE, Doctor Lieber CI , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Rock Hill

. Mary G. Lewis , District Judge. ( 0:13

- cv - 02694

- MGL )

Submitted : June 18 , 2015 Decided: June 22, 2015

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Terrence Griffin, Appellant Pro Se. Lydia L. Magee , Marian Williams Scalise , Bruce Hendricks Smith , RICHARDSON, PLOWDEN & ROBINSON, PA , Myrtle Beach, South Carolina; Elloree Ann Gane s , Robert Holmes Hood, Jr. , Robert Holmes Hood , Benjamin Houston Joyce , HOOD LAW FIRM, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.PER CURIAM:
Terrance Griffin appeals the district court ’ s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (20 12 ) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Griffi n v. Holcomb , No. 0:13

- cv - 02694

- MGL (D.S.C. Jan.
20, 2015) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains a summary of financial information extracted from the
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet and Condensed Consolidated Statement of
Operations and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           AUG-3-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-27-1996
<CASH>                                           38239
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   232570
<ALLOWANCES>                                      8556
<INVENTORY>                                     348733
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                676047
<PP&E>                                          677332
<DEPRECIATION>                                  225358
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1233361
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           497430
<BONDS>                                         170000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           406434
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           380
<OTHER-SE>                                       60274
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1233361
<SALES>                                        1115322
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1115322
<CGS>                                           757025
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1019922
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 11965
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               14257
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  81143
<INCOME-TAX>                                     33269
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              47874
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     47874
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .87
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .87
        

</TABLE>
#### JANEWAY TOWING v. CREDIT CONNECTION AUTO SALES

3175 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/14/2017

No. 11-02715

(Montgomery)

Affirmed
Exhibit 12-1

ENERGY EAST CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

|                                                                              | Calendar Year
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------
|                                                                              |              
|(Thousands)                                                                   | 2006         
|                                                                              |              
|Income From Continuing
  Operations                                           | $259,832     
|Add:                                                                          |              
|Income tax                                                                    | 155,255      
|                                                                              |              
|Pretax Income from
  Continuing Operations                                    | 415,087      
|Fixed Charges                                                                 | 315,594      
|                                                                              |              
|Earnings, as defined                                                          | $730,681     
|                                                                              |              
|Fixed Charges:                                                                |              
|Interest charges, net(1)                                                      | $308,824     
|Interest portion of
   rental charges                                         | 5,026        
|Earnings required to
   cover preferred stock
   dividends of subsidiaries(2) | 1,744        
|                                                                              |              
|Fixed Charges, as defined                                                     | $315,594     
|                                                                              |              
|Ratio of Earnings to
  Fixed Charges(3)                                       | 2.32         
|
Exhibit 10.3


 


AMENDMENT NUMBER TWO


 


TO THE


 


FOOT LOCKER SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT
PLAN


 


WHEREAS, Foot
Locker, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the Foot Locker Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, as amended and
restated as of January 1, 2005 (the “Plan”);


 


WHEREAS, pursuant
to Section 18(a) of the Plan, the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) may amend the Plan; and


 


WHEREAS, effective
as of February 2, 2014, the Board desires to amend the Plan to limit the eligibility for post-retirement health benefits to participants
whose participation in the Plan commenced prior to February 2, 2014.


 


NOW, THEREFORE,
the Plan is hereby amended, effective as of February 2, 2014, as follows:


 


The second paragraph
of Section 6(a)(i) of the Plan is hereby amended to read as follows:


 


“Solely with respect to Participants
who were Participants in the Plan prior to February 2, 2014, in the event such Participant becomes entitled to the payment of
an Award under the Plan upon Retirement on or after August 13, 2007, the Participant shall be entitled to medical and dental insurance
benefits substantially the same as those to which senior executives of the Company are entitled under the medical and dental plans
of the Company applicable to actively employed senior executives, less any benefits such Participant or his or her covered dependents
may receive from Medicare. The Participant shall be responsible for the payment of the insurance premiums applicable to actively
employed senior executives, including any subsequent increases in such premiums. The medical and dental insurance coverage provided
for herein shall cease in the event the Participant engages in Competition during the one-year period following his Retirement  






    	18



    	



    



or becomes a participant
in a new employer’s medical and dental plan.  Any Participant who
was not a Participant in the Plan prior  February 2, 2014 shall
not be entitled to the post-Retirement benefits  provided for in this
paragraph.”


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the Company has caused this amendment to be executed this 31st day of March 2014.


 




	 	 	FOOT LOCKER, INC.
	 	 	 
	 	 	By:	 /s/ Paulette
Alviti



 


	 	 	Title:	Senior Vice President and 

 Chief Human Resources 

 Officer






    	19
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,694
<SECURITIES>                                     1,321
<RECEIVABLES>                                  171,687
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,910
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         308,051
<DEPRECIATION>                                 126,578
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 416,716
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        257,078
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     147,645
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   416,716
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                33,581
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,144
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,770
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,378
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 61,154
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             61,154
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    61,154
<EPS-BASIC>                                       9.48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     9.48


</TABLE>
### Docket No. FAA**- 2015**  **- 0824** 

. 

### Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted **Date** Response **National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti**  9/24/13 **Regional Airline Association** 9/24/13 **Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman**  9/24/13 **Airlines for America Joe White**  **Robert Ireland** 9/24/13
#### Brian K. FAILON, Debtor-Appellant, v. COMPASS CHEMICAL INTERNATIONAL, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee.

No. 17-1709

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 29, 2018

Decided: February 12, 2018

Richard F. Hawkins, III, THE HAWKINS LAW FIRM, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Jennifer J. West, James Donaldson, SPOTTS FAIN, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, FLOYD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

*142Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Brian K. Failon appeals the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order determining that his debt to Compass Chemical International, LLC, is nondischargeable in his Chapter 7 proceeding under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6). We have reviewed the record included on appeal, as well as the parties’ briefs, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Failon v. Compass Chem. Int'l, LLC,*No. 3:16-cv-00926-JAG, 2017 WL 1854673 (E.D. Va. May 8, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
# Third District Court of Appeal
State of Florida
Opinion filed March 6, 2024

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D22

- 0982 Lower Tribunal No. 19

- 37471

________________ 

### Harvey Ross , Appellant,

vs. 

### Citizens Property Insurance Corporation ,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami

- Dade County, David C. Miller , Judge. Nwahiri Law, PLLC and Tobechuku Tony Nwahiri , for appellant. Williams, Leininger & Cosby, PA, and Carri S. Leininger and Maureen Martinez (N. Palm Beach) , for appellee.

Before LOGUE, C.J., and FERNANDEZ and LOBREE , JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Rich v. Narog , 366 So. 3d 1111, 111 7

– 18 (Fla. 3d DCA2

2022) (explaining Florida’s “new” summary judgment standard and stating
that “ [i] n Florida it will no longer be plausible to maintain that ‘ the existence
of any competent evidence creating an issue of fact, however credible or incredible, substantial or trivial, stops the inquiry and precludes summary judgment, so long as the ‘slightest doubt’ is raised. ’ ” (quoting In re
Amendments to Fla. Rule of Civil Procedure 1.510 , 317 So. 3d 72, 76 (Fla. 2021) )); Id. at 1118 (stating that “ where

. . . the nonmoving party bears the burden of proof on a dispositive issue at trial, the moving party need only
demonstrate ‘ that there is an absence of evidence to support the nonmoving party ’ s case ’ ” (footnote omitted) (citing Celotex Corp. v. Ca trett , 477 U.S. 317, 325 (1986) )) ; Chowdhury v. BankUnited, N.A. , 366 So. 3d 1130, 1133

n.2 (Fla. 3d DCA 2023)

.
No. 11-10982.

#### Ferguson *v.*North Carolina.

Ct. App. N. C. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       261,200
<OTHER-SE>                                   (261,200)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-10685 Summary Calendar

__________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus MARTIN EDUARDO GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:90-CR-005-K - - - - - - - - - - December 26, 1996 Before REAVLEY, JONES and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * We remanded the instant case to the district court for a determination whether Martin Eduardo Gonzalez's delay in filing his notice of appeal was due to excusable neglect. In finding no excusable neglect, the district court pointed out that Gonzalez gave no reason for his delay in giving notice of appeal. This court therefore lacks jurisdiction to consider the appeal. APPEAL DISMISSED.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1065 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1065

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require a reading 
 of the names of members of the Armed Forces who died in the previous 
                      month as a result of combat.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 24, 2020

   Mr. Cartwright (for himself, Mr. Fitzpatrick, Mrs. Walorski, Ms. 
    Norton, Mr. Pascrell, and Mr. Sean Patrick Maloney of New York) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                                on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require a reading 
 of the names of members of the Armed Forces who died in the previous 
                      month as a result of combat.

    Resolved, That--
     (a) Clause 1 of rule XIV of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives is amended by adding after the third item the following 
new item:
            ``Fourth. On the first legislative day of each month, a 
        reading of the names of members of the Armed Forces who died in 
        the previous month as a result of combat.''.
    (b) Clause 1 of rule XIV is amended by redesignating the fourth 
through the ninth items as the fifth through the tenth items.
    (c) Rule XIV of the Rules of the House of Representatives is 
amended by adding at the end the following new clause:
    ``7. The Speaker shall not read the name of any member of the Armed 
Forces under clause 1 if any family member informs the Speaker that the 
family member does not wish to have the name of that individual 
read.''.
                                 <all>
```
|
|

|Energy Market and Economic Impacts of H.R. 2454, the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009                                                                          
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Figure 10. Electricity Sector CO2 Emission in ACESA Main Cases, 2005-2030 (million metric tons).  Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800).
|Figure 10. Electricity Sector CO2 Emission in ACESA Main Cases, 2005-2030 (million metric tons).  Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800).
|Figure 10. Electricity Sector CO2 Emission in ACESA Main Cases, 2005-2030 (million metric tons).  Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800).
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 51 (Monday, March 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 12638]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6537]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION


SES Performance Review Board Members

March 11, 1997.
AGENCY: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the names of the members of the SES 
Performance Review Board of EEOC for FY 1996 and 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patricia Cornwell Johnson, Director, 
Human Resources Management Services, Equal Employment Opportunity 
Commission, 1801 L Street, N.W., Washington, D.C., 20507, (202) 663-
4306.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to the requirement of Section 
4314(c)(1), Chapter 43 Title 5 U.S.C., membership of the SES 
Performance Review Board is as follows: Ms. Ronnie Blumenthal, 
Director, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity 
Commission (Chairperson); Mr. Spencer H. Lewis, Director, New York 
District Office, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission; Mr. Federico 
Costales, Director, Miami District Office, Equal Employment Opportunity 
Commission; Ms. Issie Jenkins, Director, Baltimore District Office, 
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (Alternate). Signed at 
Washington, D.C. on this 5th day of March 1997.

    For the Commission,
Gilbert F. Casellas,
Chairman.
[FR Doc. 97-6537 Filed 3-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6570-06-M
# C_2022213EN.01002101.xml

| 30.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 213/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 213/21

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg Oost-Vlaanderen, Afdeling Gent (Belgium) lodged on 17 January 2022 — VN v Belgische Staat

(Case C-34/22)

(2022/C 213/28)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Rechtbank van eerste aanleg Oost-Vlaanderen, Afdeling Gent

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: VN

Defendant: Belgische Staat

Question referred

Does Article 21(1)(5) of the ITC 1992, as amended by Article 170 of the Law of 25 April 2014 on various provisions, infringe the provisions of Articles 56 and 63 TFEU and Articles 36 and 40 of the EEA Agreement, in that the provision in question, although it applies without distinction to domestic and foreign service providers, not only requires compliance with conditions analogous to those set out in Article 2 RD/ITC 1992, which are de facto specific to the Belgian market, but also requires, first of all, that such analogous requirements be laid down by the public authorities in the EEA State concerned, thus going beyond local prudential supervision and falling instead within the scope of the deposit guarantee scheme pursuant to Directive No 94/19/EC, [thereby] seriously imped[ing] foreign service providers from offering their services in Belgium? (1)

---

(1)  Directive 94/19/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 1994 on deposit-guarantee schemes (OJ 1994 L 135, p. 5).

---
#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Isean Oron MCNEIL, Petitioner

No. 457 MAL 2017

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

January 17, 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 17th day of January, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.
No. 11-10677.

#### Forte *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1
SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
     I, Timothy W. Byrne, Chief Executive Officer of United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. (the“Company”), hereby certify that, to my knowledge:
 (1)  The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the“Form 10-K”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2)  The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.        Dated:  March 23, 2005 /s/ Timothy W. Byrne   Timothy W. Byrne   President and Chief Executive Officer