alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 12.2
 ARCHSTONE-SMITH OPERATING TRUST
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES
AND PREFERRED SHARE DIVIDENDS
 (Dollar amounts in thousands)
 Years Ended December 31,2006(1)
    
    
    2005(1)
    
    
    2004(1)
    
    
    2003(1)
    
    
    2002(1)Earnings from operations
    
    $
    201,008
    
    
    $
    121,609
    
    
    $
    106,111
    
    
    $
    100,658
    
    
    $
    106,188Add:Interest expense
    
    
    245,895
    
    
    
    164,035
    
    
    
    125,108
    
    
    
    107,791
    
    
    
    107,978Earnings as adjusted
    
    $
    446,903
    
    
    $
    285,644
    
    
    $
    231,219
    
    
    $
    208,449
    
    
    $
    214,166Combined fixed charges and
Preferred Unit distributions:Interest expense
    
    $
    245,895
    
    
    $
    164,035
    
    
    $
    125,108
    
    
    $
    107,791
    
    
    $
    107,978Capitalized interest
    
    
    51,808
    
    
    
    39,111
    
    
    
    23,572
    
    
    
    26,854
    
    
    
    32,377Total fixed charges
    
    
    297,703
    
    
    
    203,146
    
    
    
    148,680
    
    
    
    134,645
    
    
    
    140,355Preferred Unit distributions
    
    
    3,829
    
    
    
    4,572
    
    
    
    16,254
    
    
    
    26,153
    
    
    
    34,309Combined fixed charges and
Preferred Unit distributions
    
    $
    301,532
    
    
    $
    207,718
    
    
    $
    164,934
    
    
    $
    160,798
    
    
    $
    174,664Ratio of earnings to combined
fixed charges and Preferred
Unit distributions
    
    
    1.5
    
    
    
    1.4
    
    
    
    1.4
    
    
    
    1.3
    
    
    
    1.2
 
 (1)
    
    Net earnings from discontinued operations have been reclassified for all periods presented
to conform with the list of communities in discontinued operations as of December 31, 2006.
평등고용기회위원회

 차별없는 사업장이 좋은 비지니스 입니다

차별을 하지 않는다는 것은 좋은 사업적 의미입니다. 법을 준수하는것이 직원들의 생산력, 관계유지, 사기를 증진시킬뿐 아니라 

법적비용을 절감할수 있습니다. 장애가 있는 개인을 고용하거나 알맞은 환경을 제공하시면 세금 혜택을 받을수도 있습니다. 

자세한 정보: http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/publications/adahandbook.cfm#appendixa 

EEOC는 중소기업을 도울수 있습니다! EEOC는 연방정부 기관으로 직장에서 일어나는 인종, 피부색, 종교, 성, 출신국가, 장애의 여

부, 나이, 그리고 유전적 정보로 인하여 생기는 차별에 대해 연방법을 집행합니다. 또한 위의 법은 차별을 고발하거나 반대행위를 

행한 사람 혹은 차별 조사나 소송에 가담한 일원들에게 대한 보복행위를 금지하고 있습니다.

EEOC 가도울수있는 방법 

▪ EEOC 가 집행하는 법률들의 대해 답변을 해드릴 수 

있습니다.

▪ 핍박, 보복, 또는 다른 형태/형식의 불법적인 차별을 방지하

기위해 몇가지 제안을 해드릴 수 있습니다.

▪ 고용주의 권리와 책임에 대한 교육/트레이닝을 해드릴 수 

있습니다.

▪ EEOC 에 접수된 고소장을 조정을 통해 해결이이뤄질수 있도

록 도와드릴 수 있습니다. EEOC조정은 시간과 돈을 절약할수 

있으며, 비공식적으로, 기밀리에 무료로 실행됩니다. 

의무사항 

▪ 인종, 피부색, 종교, 성, 출신국가, 장애의 여부, 나이나 

유전적 정보가 고용 결정에 영향을 끼쳐선 안됩니다.

▪ 반드시 고용 정책이나 관행이 일에 연관되어야 하며 

불평등하게 특정 인종, 피부색, 종교, 성, 출신국가, 

장애나 나이에 의해 배제해서는 안됩니다.

▪ 반드시 직원들이 인종, 피부색, 종교, 성, 출신국가, 

장애의 여부, 나이나 유전적 정보에 의해 부당한 

괴롭힘을 당하게 하면 안됩니다.

▪ 법적으로 정당하게 해명할수 있지 않는 한, 남녀 성 

구별없이 동등한 일을 하는 직원들에게는 동등한 급여

가 지급되어야 합니다.

▪ 차별에 관한 불편사항이 접수되면 신속하게 대처해야 

하며 부당한 대우나 차별을 즉시 중지하고 불편사항을 

접수한 직원이 불이익을 당하면 안됩니다.

▪ 법적으로 요구하는경우, 취직 지원자나 직원들중 

의학적이나 종교적으로 특별 지원이 필요한 경우에는 

합리적인 고용환경을 제공 하십시요 (직원이 병원 예약

시간이나 종교휴일을 맞추어야 할 경우 근무시간을 변

경해주어야 합니다).

▪ 연방노동 차별 금지법을 설명하는 포스터를 게시 

하세요. 

무료 링크 (http://www1.eeoc.gov/employers/

poster.cfm).

▪ 법이 규정하는 한 모든 고용 정보를 보관해야 합니다

(입사 지원서나 개인정보).

연방, 주, 로컬 법에 의해 다른 의무가 있을 수 있습니다.

문의 사항 

 

미국 전역에 EEOC 직원들이 귀하를 도울수있습니다. 

기다리지 마시고 연락해 주세요. 필요하신분들께는 무료 

언어지언도 해드립니다.

▪ 트레이닝/교육에관한정보가 필요하신경우? 

현지 소고용주 담당자 (http://www.eeoc.gov/employers/

contacts.cfm) 혹은 1-800-669-4000 (TTY: 1-800-669-

6820) 로 전화주세요.

▪ EEOC 가 집행하는 법률에대한 정보가필요하신경우: 

(202) 663-4691 로문의하시거나 olc@eeoc.gov 로 이메일을

보내주세요

▪ EEOC 고소장을 받으신후 궁굼한점이 있으시면 고소장을 

맡고있는 조사관에게 연락을 해주세요.

귀하의 연락을 기다리겠습니다!

추가 정보를 원하시면, 현지 소고용주 담당자에게 연락하세요.

(http://www.eeoc.gov/employers/contacts.cfm).
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Jason Ramjattansingh v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 15

- 01089

- CR

Trial court case number: 2019635

Trial court: County Criminal Court at Law No. 8 of Harris County

On May 17k, 2016, we issued an order, abating the appeal and remanding to the trial

court to enter written findings of fact and conclusions of law. On August 8, 2016, a

supplemental clerk’s record was filed containing the trial court’ s findings and conclusion.

Accordingly, we reinstate the appeal on the active docket. Appellant’s brief is due within

30 days from the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown

 Acting individua lly

Date: August 11, 2016
No. 12-5091.

#### Koehler *v.*Pennsylvania.

Super. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 6 / Thursday, January 9, 1997 / Presidential Documents 1381

Presidential Determination No. 97–15 of December 27, 1996

Assistance Program for the New Independent States of the

Former Soviet Union

Memorandum for the Secretary of State

Pursuant to subsection (d) under the heading ‘‘Assistance for the New Independent States of the Former Soviet Union’’ in Title II of the Foreign

Operations, Export Financing, and Related Programs Appropriations Act,

1997 (as enacted in Public Law 104–208), I hereby determine that it is

in the national security interest of the United States to make available

funds appropriated under that heading without regard to the restriction

in that subsection.

You are authorized and directed to notify the Congress of this determination

and to arrange for its publication in the 

œ–

Federal Register.

THE WHITE HOUSE,

Washington, December 27, 1996. [FR Doc. 97–712

Filed 1–8–97; 9:57 am]

Billing code 4710–10–P
Mississippi
No. 11-10787.

#### Washington *v.*City of Los Angeles, California, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          16,849
<SECURITIES>                                     2,936
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,344
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,910
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         393,469
<DEPRECIATION>                                 208,518
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 244,723
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        288,178
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (101,086)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   244,723
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                55,161
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   30,733
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,814
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,650
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 22,649
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             22,649
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    22,649
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.51
        

</TABLE>
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT HARR Y DENNIS a

nd JON KOZ, Plaintiffs - Appe lle e s, STEPHANIE B ER G a

nd OM A R R IVER O, Obje c tors - Appe lla nts, v. KELLOGG C OM PANY, a De la ware c orporation, De fe nda

nt - Appe lle e . No. 13-56768 D.C . No. 3:09-c v-01786-IEGW M C M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Southe rn Distric t of C a lifornia Irm a E. Gonz a le z , Se nior Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d De c e m

be r 10, 2015 ** Pa sa de n a , C a l ifornia 

# F IL ED JAN 05 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y E R, CLERK U. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s tha

t this c a se is suita

ble for de c ision without ora

l a rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).B e fore : REINHAR DT, LUC ER O *** , a

nd NGUYEN, C irc uit Judge s . Pla intiffs Stepha

nie B e rg and Om ar R ive ro a ppe a l the distric t

c ourt’ s de nia l of the ir m otion for a

ttorne y s’ fe e s in a

c e rtifie d c la ss a c tion. W e have jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291, a n d we a ffirm . The distric t c ourt did not a buse its disc re tion in deny ing Pla i ntiffs’ fe e m otion a s untim e ly . In reMe rc ury Inte rac t iv eC

orp. Se c . Litig . , 618 F.3d 988, 992 (9th C ir. 2010). De s pite a c le ar c ourt orde r that

a l l fe e a p plic ations besubm itte d at le a st forty -five da

y s prior to these ttle m e nt

he aring, Pla i ntiffs did not subm it the ir m otion until two we e ks a fte r the se ttle m e nt ha d be e n fina l iz e d. This de la y c ontra ve ne d Fe de ra l R

ule of C ivil Proc e d

ure 23(h), whic h re q

uire s tha t fe e m otions in c e rtifie d c l a ss a c tions bem a de “ at a tim e the c ourt se t s.” Fe d. R . C iv. P. 23(h)(1). W e ne e d not re a c h the re m a i ning issue s ra ise d on a ppe a l. AFFIRM E D.

*** The Honora

ble C arlos F. Luc e ro, C irc uit Judgefor the U.S. C ourt of Appe a ls for the Te nth C i rc uit, sitting by de signa tion.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Nigel A. Vinecombe, President and Chief Executive
Officer of Multi-Color Corporation (the Company), certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 9, 2010



By:

/s/ Nigel A. VinecombeNigel A. VinecombePresident and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8998 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8998

   To designate a peak in the State of Washington as ``q\w\45tmayqn-
                      6istiqayu6-Mount Cleator''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 17, 2020

Mr. Beyer (for himself and Ms. Schrier) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To designate a peak in the State of Washington as ``q\w\45tmayqn-
                      6istiqayu6-Mount Cleator''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF Q\W\78TMAYQN-9ISTIQAYU9-MOUNT CLEATOR IN THE 
              STATE OF WASHINGTON.

    (a) In General.--The 7,630-foot peak located at latitude 48.11516 
N, longitude 120.94636 W, in the Glacier Peak Wilderness in the State 
of Washington, shall be known and designated as ``q\w\45tmayqn-
6istiqayu6-Mount Cleator''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the peak referred to in 
subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to q\w\45tmayqn-
6istiqayu6-Mount Cleator.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7478

ISZARD BALLARD, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

THOMAS R. CORCORAN, Warden, Maryland House of

Correction; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF

MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

No. 97-7479

ISZARD BALLARD, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

THOMAS R. CORCORAN, Warden, Maryland House of

Correction; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF

MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.
2

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge.

(CA-97-1896-JFM, CA-97-1897-JFM)

Submitted: April 29, 1998 Decided: May 14, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Iszard Ballard, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,

Attorney General, Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying

relief on his petitions filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994

& Supp. 1998), and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have

reviewed the records and the district court's opinions and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeals on the reasoning of the district court.

Ballard v. Corcoran, No. CA-97-1896-JFM (D. Md. Oct. 1, 1997);

Ballard v. Corcoran, No. CA-97-1897-JFM (D. Md. Aug. 27, 1997;

Sept. 12, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
No. 11-9540.

#### Descamps *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*granted. Certiorari granted limited to Question 1 presented by the petition.
ALL AMERICAN SEMICONDUCTOR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES                   Exhibit 11.1

STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS (UNAUDITED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                          Quarters                    Six Months
PERIODS ENDED JUNE 30                               2003           2002           2003           2002
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                         <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE:
-------------------------

Net Income .............................    $     63,000   $    198,000   $    124,000   $    317,000
                                            ============   ============   ============   ============

Weighted Average Shares Outstanding ....       3,808,448      3,856,904      3,814,106      3,856,904
                                            ============   ============   ============   ============

Basic Earnings Per Share ...............            $.02           $.05           $.03           $.08
                                                    ====           ====           ====           ====

DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE:
--------------------------

Net Income .............................    $     63,000   $    198,000   $    124,000   $    317,000
                                            ============   ============   ============   ============

Weighted Average and Dilutive Shares:
  Weighted average shares outstanding ..       3,808,448      3,856,904      3,814,106      3,856,904
  Dilutive shares ......................          49,028         10,281         18,480         15,547
                                            ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------
                                               3,857,476      3,867,185      3,832,586      3,872,451
                                            ============   ============   ============   ============

Diluted Earnings Per Share .............            $.02           $.05           $.03           $.08
                                                    ====           ====           ====           ====
</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 54 (Thursday, March 20, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 13384]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-7034]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY
[FEMA-1162-DR]


Arkansas; Amendment to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of Arkansas, (FEMA-1162-DR), dated March 2, 1997, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 13, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3260.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster for the State 
of Arkansas, is hereby amended to include the following areas among 
those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the 
catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of March 2, 1997: The counties of Conway, Independence, 
Jefferson, Lawrence, and Woodruff for Individual Assistance and Hazard 
Mitigation.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 83.516, Disaster 
Assistance.)
Lacy E. Suiter,
Executive Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 97-7034 Filed 3-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
IV 

House Calendar No. 98 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1244 

[Report No. 116–607] 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3884) to decriminalize and 

deschedule cannabis, to provide for reinvestment in certain persons adversely impacted by the War on Drugs, to provide for expungement 

of certain cannabis offenses, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 2, 2020 

Mr. MCGOVERN, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3884) to decriminalize and deschedule cannabis, to provide for reinvestment in certain persons adversely impacted by the 

War on Drugs, to provide for expungement of certain 

cannabis offenses, and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it 

2 shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 

3 3884) to decriminalize and deschedule cannabis, to pro4 vide for reinvestment in certain persons adversely im5 pacted by the War on Drugs, to provide for expungement 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1244 RH 

1 of certain cannabis offenses, and for other purposes. All 

2 points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. 

3 In lieu of the amendment in the nature of a substitute 

4 recommended by the Committee on the Judiciary now 

5 printed in the bill, an amendment in the nature of a sub6 stitute consisting of the text of Rules Committee Print 

7 116–67, modified by the amendment printed in the report 

8 of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution, 

9 shall be considered as adopted. The bill, as amended, shall 

10 be considered as read. All points of order against provi11 sions in the bill, as amended, are waived. The previous 

12 question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as 

13 amended, and on any further amendment thereto, to final 

14 passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour 

15 of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and 

16 ranking minority member of the Committee on the Judici17 ary; and (2) one motion to recommit with or without in18 structions. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
House Calendar No. 98 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1244 

[Report No. 116–607] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3884) 

for other purposes. expungement of certain cannabis offenses, and impacted by the War on Drugs, to provide for vide for reinvestment in certain persons adversely to decriminalize and deschedule cannabis, to proDECEMBER 2, 2020 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
No. 11-11099.

#### Gleason *v.*Haws, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 12-5188.

#### Thompson *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         624,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  678,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,718,000
<PP&E>                                         718,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,720,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,859,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    10,400,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (8,602,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,720,000
<SALES>                                      1,560,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,560,000
<CGS>                                          580,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,892,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             222,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (554,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (554,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.03)
        

</TABLE>