alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 54 (Thursday, March 20, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 13365]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-7032]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Institute of Standards and Technology


Government-owned Invention; Availability for Licensing

AGENCY: National Institute of Standards and Technology, Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of a government-owned invention available for licensing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The invention listed below is owned by the U.S. Government, as 
represented by the Department of Commerce, and is available for 
licensing in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 207 and 37 CFR part 404 to 
achieve expeditious commercialization of results of federally funded 
research and development.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Technical and licensing information on this invention may be obtained 
by writing to: National Institute of Standards and Technology, 
Industrial Partnerships Program, Building 820, Room 213, Gaithersburg, 
MD 20899; Fax 301-869-2751. Any request for information should include 
the NIST Docket No. and Title for the relevant invention as indicated 
below.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NIST may enter into a Cooperative Research 
and Development Agreement (``CRADA'') with the licensee to perform 
further research on the invention for purposes of commercialization. 
The invention available for licensing is:

NIST Docket Number: 95-029/30

    Abstract: A permeation tube sealed internally in a commercially 
available automatic sampler vial provides a simple and convenient 
method of preparing, using, and storing long-term samples such as 
retention index standards. The approach is especially suited to the 
handling of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Sample can be dispensed 
at very low concentration, even at infinite dilution.

    Dated: March 14, 1997.
Elaine Bunten-Mines,
Director, Program Office.
[FR Doc. 97-7032 Filed 3-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-13-M
# hr2454nobnk.0729a

Total Energy Supply and Disposition Summary

Energy Consumption by Sector and Source

Energy Prices by Sector and Source

Residential Sector Key Indicators and Consumption

Commercial Sector Key Indicators and Consumption

Industrial Sector Key Indicators and Consumption

Transportation Sector Key Indicators and Delivered Energy Consumption

Electricity Supply, Disposition, Prices, and Emissions

Electricity Generating Capacity

Electricity Trade

Liquid Fuels Supply and Disposition

Petroleum Product Prices

Natural Gas Supply, Disposition, and Prices

Oil and Gas Supply

Coal Supply, Disposition, and Prices

Renewable Energy Generating Capacity and Generation

Carbon Dioxide Emissions by Sector and Source

Macroeconomic Indicators

Energy-Related Carbon Dioxide Emissions by End Use

Renewable Energy Consumption by Sector and Source 1/

Greenhouse Gas Compliance Results
**Exhibit10.7**

 

PROMISSORY NOTE

 
| $130,582.75 |   | February 2, 2004 |
|-------------|--------|-----------------------|

 

FOR VALUEDRECEIVED, and legally bound hereby, INNSUITES HOSPITALITY TRUST (“Maker”), anOhio real estate investment trust, having an office at 1615 East NorthernAvenue, Suite 102, Phoenix, Arizona 85020 hereby promises to pay to Brian Wirth(“Note Holder”) or order and address as specified below the principal sum ofONE HUNDRED THIRTY THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED EIGHTY TWO AND 75/100 DOLLARS($130,582.75), with interest on the unpaid principal balance thereon from timeto time outstanding, at the rate of seven percent (7.00%) per annum, computedon a three hundred sixty (360)-day year, to be due and payable in installmentsof principal and interest as follows:

 

(A)                              $130,582.75amortized over 84 months at 7% interest ($1,970.84/month). This Note isnon-recourse secured by 58,259 RRF Limited Partnership Class B units. Monthlyinstallments of principal and interest to begin on March 2, 2004.

 

(B)                                Paymentsto be made payable to:

BrianWirth or Rare Earth Financial LLC

InnSuitesHotel Centre Suite 102

1615E. Northern Avenue,

Phoenix,AZ 85020

 

The 58,259 RRF LimitedPartnership Class B units will remain as security for the unpaid balance on theNote. Payments made under this note shall be subject to any current bank ormortgage covenants.

 

At the option ofthe Note Holder, late charges upon written notice are assessed as follows:

10 days late, $50 penalty

35 days late, $150 penalty

Over 35 days late, Note Holder could declare the note in default andcall the entire amount due.

Should default be declared, units proportionate to unpaid balance willbe returned to Note Holder.

 

Principal andinterest payable in lawful money of the United States.

 

If legalproceedings are entered into to recover on this Note, the undersigned agree(s)to pay such sum as the Court may fix as attorney’s fees.

 

The Makers andendorsers hereof severally waive diligence, demand, presentment for payment andprotest, and consent to the extension or time of payment of this Note withoutnotice.

 

 

INNSUITESHOSPITALITY TRUST,

an Ohio real estateinvestment trust

 

 
|   | By:    | /s/ Marc Berg |                            |
|--------|--------|---------------|---------------------------------|
|   |   |          | Name: Marc E. Berg              |
|   |   |          | Title: Secretary and  Treasurer |
|        |        |               |                                 |  |

 

----
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, James
F. Wirth, Chief Executive Officer of InnSuites Hospitality Trust (the
“Company”), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1. The
Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended January 31,
2008 (the “Annual Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m or 78o(d)); and





2. The
information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.








Date:
      May 15, 2008
            By:
            /s/
      James F. WirthName:
      James F. WirthTitle:
      Chief Executive
Officer
Adams, Kevin (OSn 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Attachments: 

Hi All, 

Adams, Kevin (OST) 

Tuesday, July 16, 2013 9:24AM 

Elaine Giso, Office of the Watertown City Manager; James Lawrence, Airport Manager of 

Watertown; Jeffrey Graham, Mayor of Watertown; Robert Hagemann ill, Jefferson 

County Administrator; Sharon Addison, Watertown City Manager 

'Livsey, Will'; Bailey, Ted 

Request for Comment re the proposal of American Airlines at Watertown, NY (the only 

carrier to bid) 

Proposal, American, Watertown, NY.pdf 

Attached above is a copy of the one timely-filed proposal for Essential Air Service (EAS) at Watertown, submitted by 

American Airlines. We are currently reviewing that proposal. The attached proposal is directly from the carrier and will 

soon be reflected in the Docket, which you may access through Regulations.gov at DOT-OST-1997-2842, along with 

other pertinent information on this proceeding. 

The next step in the carrier-selection process is for you to provide us with the community's comments, a critically 

important element in our carrier-selection decision, especially the comments of civic officials. Accordingly, I ask that 

everyone get back to us, preferably by email, no later than August 13, 2013. We will docket this email, as well as any 

replies. 

In brief, look at the proposal, and if you have any questions, call me, and get back to us by the deadline, August 13. 

Best, 

Kevin Adams 

. 202-366-1047 ' 

1 

)" .· ( 

l., .. ·>..J' 

i~· ··; . 

· .. ,.
No. 12-5379.

#### Rose *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certio-rari denied.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Francis D. Gerace, President and Chief Executive Officer of Multi-Color Corporation (the Company), certify pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 10, 2009



By:

/s/ Francis D. GeraceFrancis D. Gerace President and Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY DESIGN VALUE REPORT Jul. 9, 2013 Report Request ID: 1115009 Report Code: AMP480

Selection Criteria Page 1 User ID: FRX

State County City

Site Parameter POC AQCR UAR CBSA CSA EPA Region Method Duration Begin Date End Date 06 067 GEOGRAPHIC SELECTIONS

PROTOCOL SELECTIONS Parameter Classification Parameter Method Duration DESIGN VALUE 81102

SELECTED OPTIONS

SINGLE EVENT PROCESSING WORKFILE DELIMITER USER SITE METADATA MERGE PDF FILES QUARTERLY DATA IN WORKFILE

Option Type Option Value EXCLUDE REGIONALLY CONCURRED EVENTS

, STREET ADDRESS YES NO GLOBAL DATES

2013 Start Date End Date 2013 Tribal Code

APPLICABLE STANDARDS Standard Description PM10 24-hour 2006UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM PRELIMINARY DESIGN VALUE REPORT Report Date: Jul. 9, 2013

Notes: 1. Computed design values are a snapshot of the data at the time the report was run (may not be all data for year). 2. Some PM2.5 24-hour DVs for incomplete data that are marked invalid here may be marked valid in the Official report due to additional analysis. 3. Annual Values not meeting completeness criteria are marked with an asterisk ('*'). Page 1 of 2UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM PRELIMINARY DESIGN VALUE REPORT Report Date: Jul. 9, 2013

Notes: 1. Computed design values are a snapshot of the data at the time the report was run (may not be all data for year). 2. Some PM2.5 24-hour DVs for incomplete data that are marked invalid here may be marked valid in the Official report due to additional analysis. 3. Annual Values not meeting completeness criteria are marked with an asterisk ('*'). Page 2 of 2 

### Pollutant: Standard Units: NAAQS Standard: Statistic: PM10 Total 0-10um STP(81102) Design Value Year: 2013 Micrograms/cubic meter (25 C)(001) PM10 24-hour 2006 Annual Estimated Days > Standard REPORT EXCLUDES MEASUREMENTS WITH REGIONALLY CONCURRED EVENT FLAGS. Level: 150 State Name: California

Site ID POC STREET ADDRESS | | | Estimated #Comp Cert& Eval | | | Estimated #Comp Cert& Eval | | | Estimated Quarter Cert& Eval | | | Estimated Exceedances Validity

Ind. 2013 2012 2011

06-067-0002 06-067-0006 06-067-0006 06-067-0010 06-067-0014 06-067-0014 06-067-0284 06-067-4001 06-067-4001 1

1 2 1 1 3 1 2 3 7823 BLACKFOOT WAY, NORTH HIGHLANDS DEL PASO-2701 AVALON DR, SACRAMENTO DEL PASO-2701 AVALON DR, SACRAMENTO 1309 T ST., SACRAMENTO, CA. 95814 68 GOLDENLAND COURT, SACRAMENTO, CA 95834 68 GOLDENLAND COURT, SACRAMENTO, CA 95834 3847 BRANCH CENTER ROAD HLTH CTR-2221 STOCKTON BLVD, SACRAMENTO HLTH CTR-2221 STOCKTON BLVD, SACRAMENTO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4

4 4 4 4 3 4 4 0 S S S S S S S S S 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4

4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N *

*

*

*

*

*

* * *

* * Count Quarter Exceedances 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Quarter Count Exceedances 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Count #Comp Exceedances 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 - Year
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 952 

To enact into law a framework for deciding whether certain projectiles are 

‘‘primarily intended for sporting purposes’’ for purposes of determining 

whether the projectiles are armor piercing ammunition. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 4, 2019 

Mr. ENGEL (for himself, Mr. MEEKS, Mr. COHEN, Ms. NORTON, Mr. HASTINGS, and Mrs. WATSON COLEMAN) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To enact into law a framework for deciding whether certain 

projectiles are ‘‘primarily intended for sporting purposes’’ 

for purposes of determining whether the projectiles are 

armor piercing ammunition. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Armor-Piercing Bullets 

5 Act of 2019’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 952 IH

1 SEC. 2. FRAMEWORK FOR DECIDING WHETHER CERTAIN 

2 PROJECTILES ARE ‘‘PRIMARILY INTENDED 

3 FOR SPORTING PURPOSES’’ FOR PURPOSES 

4 OF DETERMINING WHETHER THE PROJEC5 TILES ARE ARMOR PIERCING AMMUNITION. 

6 Section 921(a)(17) of title 18, United States Code, 

7 is amended by adding at the end the following: 

8 ‘‘(D)(i) For purposes of subparagraph (C), a .22 cal9 iber projectile that otherwise would be armor piercing am10 munition shall be considered to be primarily intended to 

11 be used for sporting purposes if the projectile weighs 40 

12 grains or less and is loaded into a rimfire cartridge. 

13 ‘‘(ii)(I)(aa) Except as provided in clause (i), a projec14 tile that otherwise would be armor piercing ammunition 

15 shall, for purposes of subparagraph (C), be considered to 

16 be primarily intended to be used for sporting purpose if 

17 the projectile is loaded into a cartridge for which the only 

18 handgun that is readily available in the ordinary channels 

19 of commercial trade is a single shot handgun, subject to 

20 subclause (II). 

21 ‘‘(bb) In subclause (aa), the term ‘single shot hand22 gun’ means a break-open or bolt action handgun that can 

23 accept only a single cartridge manually, and does not ac24 cept or use a magazine or other ammunition feeding de25 vice, but does not include a pocket pistol or derringer-type 

26 firearm. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 952 IH

1 ‘‘(II) For purposes of subparagraph (C), the Attorney 

2 General may treat a projectile as not primarily intended 

3 to be used for sporting purposes if substantial evidence 

4 exists that the projectile is not primarily intended to be 

5 used for sporting purposes.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted), Jill M. Broadfoot, the Chief Financial Officer of Vical Incorporated (the Company), hereby certifies that, to the best of her knowledge:



|1. | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the Periodic Report),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Periodic
Report and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Periodic Report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|Dated: August 7, 2009  
|                       
|/s/ JILL M. BROADFOOT  
|Jill M. Broadfoot      
|Chief Financial Officer

THIS CERTIFICATION ACCOMPANIES THE FORM 10-Q TO WHICH IT RELATES, IS NOT DEEMED FILED WITH THE SEC AND
IS NOT TO BE INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO ANY FILING OF THE COMPANY UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, OR THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED (WHETHER MADE BEFORE OR AFTER THE DATE OF THE FORM 10-Q), IRRESPECTIVE OF ANY
GENERAL INCORPORATION LANGUAGE CONTAINED IN SUCH FILING. A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS CERTIFICATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE COMPANY AND WILL BE RETAINED BY THE COMPANY AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON
REQUEST.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

JOSEPHUS WILLIAMS, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-2987

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed September 13, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota 

County; Charles E. Roberts, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and 

Richard P. Albertine, Jr., Assistant Public 

Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, for Appellee.

KHOUZAM, Chief Judge. 

This is Josephus Williams' Anders1 appeal of the revocation of his 

probation and the resulting sentence of fifteen years in prison for fleeing or attempting to 

1Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
- 2 -

elude a law enforcement officer. We affirm in all respects except we remand for the 

entry of an amended revocation order. 

The record shows that an affidavit was filed alleging Williams had 

committed three violations of condition five of his probation by failing to live without 

violating any law. Following an evidentiary hearing, the court found that Williams had 

willfully and substantially violated his probation and a revocation order was entered. 

However, the revocation order does not specify the conditions that Williams was found 

to have violated. Accordingly, we must remand for the entry of an order that delineates 

the specific conditions Williams was found to have violated. See Montonez v. State, 

724 So. 2d 650, 651 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999).

Affirmed and remanded with instructions. 

NORTHCUTT and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit 32

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER,
                 PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER (ACTING)
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Harold Blomquist, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of Simtek Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended March 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Simtek Corporation.



/s/ Harold Blomquist
--------------------------------------
Harold Blomquist
Chief Executive Officer, President and
Chief Financial Officer (acting)
May 13, 2005
<PAGE> 1

Exhibit 21                          PGI INCORPORATED        PAGE 1 OF 1
----------                          ----------------
                                      SUBSIDIARIES
                                      ------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                  State of                  Relationship
                                                  Incorporation             ------------
                                                  -------------
<S>                                               <C>                       <C>
Sugarmill Woods, Inc.                             Florida                   Wholly owned <F1>
Sugarmill Woods Management, Inc.                  Florida                   Wholly owned <F1>
Deep Creek Utilities, Inc.                        Florida                   Wholly owned <F1>
Southern Woods, Incorporated                      Florida                   Wholly owned by Sugarmill Woods, Inc.
Burnt Store Marina, Inc.                          Florida                   Wholly owned <F1>
Punta Gorda Isles Sales, Inc.                     Florida                   Wholly owned <F1>
Burnt Store Utilities, Inc.                       Florida                   Wholly owned <F1>
Gulf Coast Credit Corporation                     Florida                   Wholly owned <F1>
Sugarmill Woods Sales, Inc.                       Florida                   Wholly owned by Sugarmill Woods, Inc.
Sugarmill Construction, Inc.                      Florida                   Wholly owned by Sugarmill Woods, Inc.

<FN>
----------
<F1>  Included in the Company's consolidated financial statements.
</TABLE>
No. 11-10450.

#### Rogers *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-11013.

#### Capelton *v.*United States.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 12-5008.

#### Salas *v.*Illinois.

App. Ct. Ill., 1st Dist. ' Cer-tiorari denied.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23



                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No.33-58311) pertaining to the United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. 1992
Stock Option Plan, as amended, of our report dated January 19, 1999, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements of United States Lime &
Minerals, Inc. and subsidiaries included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 1998.



                                                          /s/ ERNEST & YOUNG LLP
                                                          Ernest & Young LLP





Dallas, Texas
March 3, 1999