# •

•

• South Coast Air Quality Management District 

# tlfifmJ 21865 Copley Drive , Diamond Bar, CA 91 765 -4 178

__ ___ (909) 396-2000 • www.aqmd.gov

BOARD MEETING DATE: June 6, 2014 AGENDA NO. 31 PROPOSAL:
SYNOPSIS:

COMMITTEE: Adopt the 2016 AQMP Reasonably Available Control Technology Demon s tration As a component of the 20 16 AQMP, SCAQMD i s required to s ubmit a Rea sonab ly Available Control Tec hnology ( RACT) Demon stratio n to U.S. EPA b y July 20, 2014. The RACT analysis provides a comprehensive assessment of the adequacy and comparative levels of emissions controls achieved in practice throu g hout the nation. The c urrent analysis demonstrates that SCAQMD current rule s largely meet U.S. EPA's criteria for RACT acceptability and inclu sio n in the SIP. It also identifies a few areas for further evaluation as part of the 2016 AQMP control measure development. This action i s to approve the RACT Demonstration and direct staff to forward to CARB for approval and s ubmis s ion to U
. S. EPA for in c lu s ion in the SIP. Stationary Source, May 16, 2014, Reviewed RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: 1. Approve the attached Re sol ution cer tifying that the SCAQMD's current air pollution rule s and regulations fulfill the 8-hour ozone Rea so nably Available Control Techno l ogy requirements , and adopting the RACT SIP revision; and 2. Direct staff to forward the updated analysis

- 2016 AQMP Reasonably Available Contro l Technology Demonstration to CARB for review and submission to the U.S
. EPA. APPROVED by the South Coast Ai r Quality Manage m ent District Board { Date : •**~** 

### &-{,

## -1..;**~:yutf:JA:. ~**  Clerk of the Board EC :PF:JC : GO :K C Background Barry R. Wallerstein , D.Env
. Executive Officer

The South Coast Air Bas in (Basin) i s classified as "extreme" and the Coachella Valley l ocated in Ri verside County i s classified as "severe-15" non-attainment areas with 

### ('/ea11i11g 

## the air 

## that Jt 

### e 

## breathe ...respect to the 2008 8-hour Ozone National Ambient.Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)
. The Clean Air Actrequires that areas classified as moderate nonattainment or higher must develop and submit a demonstration that their current air pollution rules fulfill the 8-hour ozone Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) Demonstration. The RACT analysis provides a comparison of the SCAQMD rules and regulations governing emissions to those established by the U.S. EPA guidance and representative agencies within California.and elsewhere throughout the United States. The purpose of the RACT analysis is to review, and where applicable, update an agency's toolkit to advance emissions controls to meet the current state of the science. The RACT State Implementation Plan (SIP) must be submitted by CARB to U.S. EPA by July 20, 2014. RACT analyses were incorporated as components of the 2007 and 2012 Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) Reasonably.AvailableControl Measures (RACM)/RACT analyses submitted to the U.S. EPA for inclusion in the California SIP. The 2007 analysis was primarily conducted to identify and select control measures to reduce ozone precursor NOx and VOC emissions; while the 2012 analysis focused on precursors of PM2.5. Staff studied more than 100 rules and regulations, and 100 control measures developed in the 2007-2012 timeframe by other nonattainment air districts in the, nation. The analyses concluded that the SCAQMD's rules and regulations were in general equivalent to, or more stringent than other districts' rules and regulations and their proposed control measures in their respective SIPs. Proposal The attached 2016 AQMP RACT Demonstration provides a comprehensive assessment of .the current SCAQMD rules 'and regulations
.. In conducting the review, staff worked closely with the U.S. EPA adhering. to the provided criteria and guidance. Since the 2012 AQMP submittal, the U.S. EPA has issued no new Control Technique Guidelines (CTG) for VOC sources and Alternative Control Techniques (ACT) documeqts for VOC and NOx sources. Regardless, the 2016 AQMP RACT analysis evaluated more than 30 rules recently developed and 

### I or amended by other ozone nonattainment air districts from September 2012 to March 2014. The air districts in California included the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD), San Joaquin Air Pollution Control District 

### (SN APCD), Sacramento Metro Air Quality Management District (SMAQMD), Mojave/Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District (MDAQMD/AV AQMD), and Ventura County Air Pollution .Control District (VCAPCD) and state agencies for ozone.impacted.Je:Xf!.S, Milryiand and Delaware.

- . ' The analysis indicates that SCAQMD rules and regulatio_n closely matched those of the other agencies, and only eight SCAQMD rules co:veriil'g:six 'source areas requife further evaluation:
• Fugitive VOC emissions monitoring protocols between the BAAQMD and the SCAQMD gasoline bulk terminal and cargo tank operations need to be evaluated -2- 

# •

•

•

# •

• to detennine whether the provisions of seAQMD Rule 462 apply to BAAQMD's Section 8-Rule 33
... • Rule 71.5 of veAPeD regulates voe emissions from glycol dehydrators in natural gas dehydration needs to be evaluated to detennine if existing Rule 1148.1 and Rule 1173 already cover these emissions.
• Flare· emissions from sources other than refineries, sulfur recovery plants, hydrogen production plants need to**b~** 

### evaluated for potential controls, since 

### SNAPeD Rule 4311 regulates these flares emitting greater than 

### 10 tpy of VOC orNOx.
• AVAQMD Rule 1130 ancj companion SeAQMD Rule 1130 require further evaluation for voe content limit offlexographic specialty inkfor flexible package printing although inventory records ·indicate that the Basin emission reduction potential for this category to be de minimis 

### based on the number of affected facilities.
• BAAQMD rule (Reg: 9, Rule 13) NOx emission rate limits for cement kih1s will 

### be evaluated to compare the impacts of alternate averaging periods and emissions limits with SeAQMD Rule 2002 •


### • SNAPeD Rule 4570 applies to large confined animal facilities while using a lower applicability threshold fordairy and poultry facilities. It 

### also specifies livestock feeding time restrictions based on local a feeding practice (wet feed) which might not apply to SeAQMD Rule 223 employed in the Basin where ciry 

### feed is μsed._More detailed evaluation will 

### be conductedto detennine the applicability of such feeding time restriction on District's sources, and the extension of rule applicability to certain livestock categories using a lower size threshold. Overall, for the 2016 AQMP RAeT Demonstration, SeAQMD.makes the following findings: 1. SeAQMD's current.11.1les meet U.S. EPA's criteria for RAeT acceptability and inclusion in the SIP. 2. seAQMD commits to further evaluate the six categories identified above for ·potential emissio.n reductions as part of the 2016**AQ~** 

### control measure

development.

-3--: ,, ., - - --,:- ·- '


### ..
.. > .
, 

### ..

## ,·P:il_!!J1f,'gr~t~~l 

## ..**fi~** • - .·/i 1 :_• .--r'
.. :·'

## o~**~-'.'"t** •'

## ~~·- O •'

## ~**~·.- )~-~** **·.~** ' -, - U ---·

## .'::_·!--~ ' "> '-

## ~f**.~·I** 

# r. ".

-- -
0 '•



## . A**3m9_ay;'fi§t!.c~;~~~iftitl2_!!~1!~9J~fo/!5 !i2llling1;~** **iWJ~!icm~~g :Qn·th~i~OT**  

## S!P 

## .:subrnifW'1'**'Q~~;p111Jli_cc9riμn~,rit·w~~**

### ..**r~ceii'e4iii~ifajfiiPg,.foJ~e:reduction:ofmet»ane** 

## 'ai;t<l,**n~Iate.ct\gasesj·emliJjatiI1gi'fr9fu.loil ,119~.** **g~s,\Jf**

## i.i:ts .·**·tJi'e';r~qpe~tfo1se.ektsuc~** 

## errrission 

## teductionsdiia)'oe· suitedJot a.filttrre control ;ffieasure';ilrvestigation, since'. 

## a' RACT**filiai)i~is**

## ]§,re_s_tii9tecl**6iiiylt()·~d.9-P~~!!~~e§:,_@d:~g1\'I~_tj~i:ls;"** 

## · · · .**~ ~**  

## _., ::

4 ,,·



### ... \;

,....;,, ::'•**I~•',** •' >·" 1,:



### . '

.,

. ' . 

## ' ·-·**~** 

### .. :·.·' , 

## .

•'

. ' '•

.


### . ' .·

.. 

### ' ·. . 

# .

.. , 

# .. ·. ' ' 

### . :_;.



## "

J '---·· __ :. _____**,J,.~-~--~** r_ _:_ - -**"~** - - . - 

# . ,. ,.J ·, 

## .**.~** f r . .,_

._._

·.**f~.** f··

,,

"., 

# •••



# •

### ATTACHMENT A
RESOLUTION NO. 14-14

A Resolution of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCQAMD) Board certifying that the SCAQMD's current air pollution rules and regulations.fulfill the 8-hour ozone Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) requirements, and adopting the RACT SIP revision. A Resolution of the SCAQMD Board certifying the Notice of Exemption for the 2016 AQMP Reasonably Available Control Technology Demonstration. A Resolution directing staff to forward the 2016 AQMP Reasonably Available Control Technology Demonstration to the California Air Resources Board (CARD) for review and submission to the United States Environmental ProtectionAgency (U.S. EPA). WHEREAS, Federal Register Volume 78, Page 34178, June 6, 2013, requires the State (or essentially local air districts) to submit a RACT SIP analysis within 24 months after the effective date of designation; and WHEREAS, the U.S. EPA has developed guidance and a list of Control Technique Guidelines (CTG) and Alternative Control Techniques (ACT) to aid local air districts in developing the RACT SIP Submittal in a consistent and effective manner; and WHEREAS, based on the Clean Air Act (CAA) §172 (c)(l) and 182, and the California Health and Safety Code (H& 

### SC)§§ 40460(a), 40913, and 40440(a), the SCAQMD is required to adopt an Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP), rules and regulations containing reasonably available control measures (RACM) and RACT for both oxides ofnitrogen (NOx) and volatile organic compounds (VOC) in order to lead the Basin into attainment with the federal and state ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) as expeditiously as practicable; and · WHEREAS, for the majority of the stationary and area .source categories, the SCAQMD has been identified as having the most stringent air quality plan, rules andregulations in California; and WHEREAS, in order to approve a rule and regulation into the SIP, CARB and U.S. EPA have to consider ifthe rule and regulation meets, at a minimum, the "presumptive" RACT level. Therefore, any categories for which U.S. EPA has notpublished any additional CTG/ACT'afterthe approval date, and for which no more stringent rule has since peen adopted, should be considered as meeting RACT for the 8- hour ozone NAAQS, In addition, the.SCAQMD routinely reviews its rules at least every three years forair quality management·update, most recently in 2012, and proposes rule amendments whenever any information comes to its attention that indicates .that a rule can be made more stringent. The fact that these two review processes have not revealed anypotential for making these rules more stringent indicates that the existing rules satisfy currentRACT for the 8-hour ozone NAAQS; and WHEREAS, where a CTG/ ACT became available after the U.S. EPA rule approval date; SCAQMD staff evaluated the rule and determined if the level of control provided in the new CTG/ ACT was more stringentthan the adopte·d rule; and WHEREAS, where the regulation approved by U.S. EPA is amended after the approval date, SCAQMD staff evaluated the amendments to ensure that the amendment does not result in a relaxation of control; and WHEREAS, substantiated by the analyses above, staff concluded that all CTG sources are subject to rules in Regulations IV, IX, X, XI, XIII, and/or XX which meet RACT requirements; and WHEREAS, substantiated by the analyses above; SCAQMD staff concluded that all major·non-CTG sources in the Basin are subject to rules in Regulations IV, XI, XIII, ,and/or XX that meet RACT requirements; and WHEREAS, since there·are currently no Regulation XI source-specific rules for agricultural pesticide applications, no RACT determination can be made, However, agricultural pestieide applicatfon is regulated by the State Department of Pestidde Regulation, and is not un:der the control ofthe SCAQMD; and WHEREAS, 'Title V facilities in the Basin-which have federal enforceable permits with dearly identified SIPcapptoved rules, all of which have been demonstrated to meet RACJ,-as discussed above; and WHEREAS, the SCAQMD Governing Board finds and determines that the SCAQMD 8cHour Ozone RACT SIP determination and submittal is considered a " project" pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA);·however, SCAQMD,staffreviewed the.proposed project and determined with.certainty thai the proposed project is exemprfrom the requirements of CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines §1506l(b)(3); and

-2-WHEREAS, the Board has held a public hearing in accordance with all provisions of law; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, thatthe SCAQMD Board certifies that the SCAQMD's current air pollution rules and regulations fulfill the 8-hour ozone Reasonably Available Control Technology requirements. BE ITFURTHER RESOLVED, that the South Coast Air Quality Management District Governing Board does hereby certify the Notice of Exemption for the proposed project, is completed in compliance with CEQA Guidelines 

### § l 

### 5002(k)(l)

- Three Step Process and 

### §15061(b)(3)- Review for Exemption (General Rule Exemption). This information was presented to the Governing Board, whose members reviewed, considered, and approved the information therein prior to acting on the proposed project. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that SCAQMD commits to further evaluate the six source categories identified in the RACT demonstration for potential emission reductions as part of the 

### 2016 AQMP control measure development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, thatthe SCAQMD Governing Board requests that the 

### 2016 AQMP Reasonably Available Control Technology Demonstration be submitted into the State Implementation Plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Executive Officeris hereby directed to forward a copy of this Resolution and the 

### 2016 AQMP Reasonably Available Control Technology Demonstration to the California Air Resources Board for approval and subsequent submittal to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for inclusion into the State Implementation Plan.
AYES: Antonovich, B. Benoit, 

### J. Benoit, Burke, Buscaino, Cacciotti, Gonzales, Lyou, Mitchell, Nelson, Parker, Pulido, and Yates. NOES: None. ABSENT: None.

DATE: 

# ,Twv-: 

# i J Z/; I 

# i**~~"{Yb)~j)** Saundra McDaniel, Clerk of the Board

-3-

# •

•• ATIACHMENT B



### SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

2016 AQMP Reasonably Available Control Technology(RACT)Demonstration May 22, 2014

Deputy Executive Officer Planning, Rule Development, and Area :sources Elaine Chang, DrPH AssistantDeputy Executive Officer Planning; Rule Development, and Area.Sources Philip M. Fine, Ph.D. Planning and Rules Manager Planning, Rule Development, and Area Sources Joseph C. Cassmassi

Authors: Reviewed by: Kalam Cheung, Ph: D.

- Air Quality Specialist Gary Quinn, P.E.

- Program Supervisor Barbara Baird

- Chief DeputY Counsel·.. -.·.

... .**~.'._'** . l: ' '**'~-** ' ......

.. . ,**~LIAM1A:::BURi(E;.Eci:o,,** -

'**!S~<:r '?ftheh\ss~n1b1y**  Appointee: ._.:' _;__ ,.__**~·-~:~~-~·-~-:~:** ..**·:~~~~;_2;=~** ·,**l,_'~··'• ~·**  i .\**~""-**

. :oENNIS¥A:PES
. . - . 

### ; ,**Mayo~** 

## :·pfuPd\**~,'** 

## ' . - _

_**Citi~s-.of,S:iij.'Benw-illl)o'** County



### ... MEMBERS·• · •- ,_ 

### . . \



## MICHAE1"':1'>
.. ANT0N6Vi.eli " :supen;i.S'or; Fifth•Di!ifriCi

- 'C(Jl!11iy, 

### 3j,**k<:J~; ~gel~** 

- . 

## . ' -


### , BENiBEN©fu:· .- ·• - -



## .**M:a:~9-.'-;i'rii :fim,,wiiai>nilir:** **.ciiiesiofRiver~ide** county ·

JOIIN•J.**BEN~IT,**


### .**srrpi:~s6f;f6urtlif>istrlbt** 

### -- Couiit5;· Of**Ri~side** \ 

## ,,

. MICHAEL-A. CAC€I0il'T
_ Councilmember; Sorilli>Pasadena. . . -

### C:lrt~;of_l:<isi&i!ie1e5~Gbl!n'iyl'ga,siel'l!'BegioJ1 " JOSIE 60NZAI:lES 

### ·**su~oi;;I'iftli'Disfrier.**



## .**~·** 

## ..**·~j,** 

## ,• ' -
.. ' Col!nlY**oN~l!ll B~rmu:dinc;>** **•-'~---'-** --··**~- ,..·~·-**  •, 

## ...

JOSEi>i-IOK:.L-Yoff.·Pb.1.D:**o<iveinor~~:Aifptili!~.:·.-···** ·-·- 

### JUDITHMITCHELe l\{ay9r,**R<Jlfu!.g:•J:!i!!(E§_i~.Les** 

### _-_ . titie8 of[.os.l\lfgeles CcniI1ty/\veste.hi-Regi!JI1

. r·- SHAwN NELS@N· ·- .. 

### s\ii)ervisiif:,Fouftli'E>isfriet: copij!y**'.<_i:t]~Qn1nge** · · -• - - ' ' '**~-** .



## ' ' 

## .. ·l: - "

- .**~**



# ...

) - -· 

# . .. . ; .

'
.

- ;;. '



### ...**~** 

# •

•

.·I,,..,_._**-:--·1·-~;;/,_---,---;r"'.:-~1:¢"''f~-~------** •f- '".' '· 

### ·. -_-.- --., .It" -- - • ·- r-1. ' .,. 

### .- 

## ... ., .•, ..**),;;·~** 

## ·**-~** 

## .rr--. ··**~** 

## ··

-· .···,, .•,**-~** 

### . ;::-.**--.,_:·~'..** 

# -·"

-**.'f1,'.>-:_..~·** - , • • .**~** • J J
..



### .**~;·** 

### . . / :,-**tf~Ft~~~E$** 

### ..**'.~,:** 

### ··;···:::-·•;•**'·.-;:·"'::'.'':~,.:.** 

### ··;·:· .. :. '·'·: '·'•,,
...·.'-.'··
.. '""'··",. ·'',
...... :...... : : ... ··: .... : .. ......**R.~'.t'** .;- 

### .

";/

'I '**~** ·•

.- 

### ..•



## .- ·

.. ·-- ".'"':: ·-··;"
-



# ...

"

.• ,•

I' ., . . 1

-,,.; :,\ °).··- t ·_ ...... ! ':'._"-__.:_ -! ' 

### .._.Reasonably Available ControlTechnology Demonstration


### INTRODUCTION The South Coast 

### Air Basin (Basin) is
.. classified as "extreme 7 ' and the Coachella Valley located Jn Riverside County is classified as "severe-15" non-attainmentareas with respect to the 2008 8-hour Ozone National Ambient Air .Quality Staridards.(NAAQS). The Clean 

### Air Act reqt1ires thatcareas classified as moderate nonattainh)ent or higher 

### must develop and submit a demonstration that their. current air pollution rules fulfill the**.s~hour** ozone Reasonably·Available Control Technology (RACT) Demonstration. TheRACT analysis provides a comparison of the SCAQMD rules and regulations governing· emissions to those established by·the tJ.S
.. EPA guidance and represent,ative agencies within California and elsewhere throughout the US. The purpose of the RACT analysis is to review and where·applicable update an agency's toolkit to.advance emissions controls to meet the currencstate ofthe science, The RACT State Implementation Plan (SIP) must be. submitted by CARB to the U.S: EPAby July 20, 2014. 

### REGULATORY HISTORY RACT analyses wete incorporated as components of the 2007 ang.2012,Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) Reasonably Available Control Measures (RACM)IRACT Demonstrations submitted to the U.S. EPA for inclusion of the California"SIP. The2007 demonstration was'a comprehensive.analysis cofiducted to identify and select control measures to reduce ozone and particiHate precursor NOx, VOC, SOx and particulate 

# •

emissions (to meet'the**s~hour** ozone and annual PM2.5 standards). The 2012 analysis • focused primarily on precursors of PM2.5 including NOx, VOC and SOx (to attain the 24-hour average PM2.5 standard1. Staff studied more than 

### TOO rules andTegulations, and 100 control measures developed.in. the 20Q7c2012 timefrartte'by other nbnattaifiment air districts in the nation, The demol].strations concluded that the SCAQMD's rules and regulations were in generalequivalent to, or more stringent than other districts' rules and regulations (RACT) and their proposed.control measures in theirrespective SIPs (RACM). The 2007 and 2012 RACM/RACTdemonstrations documents are included 

### ih the.2007 AQMP (Table 3 ofthe 2007 AQMP "Appendix VI: Reasonably Available Control Measures (RACM) Demonstration") and the 2012.AQMP (Tables**VI~3,** VI-4 ancfVIc5 c:if the 2012.AQMP "Appendix 

## vr: Reasonably Available Control Measures (RACM)**Demonstration~')** and they are ayailable 

### frOrn theSCAQMD website at. the links below:. 2007AQMPhttp://www.agmd.gov/home/library/clean-air-plans/air"gualitycmgt-plan/2007-air-gualitymanagement-plan 2012AQMP http://www
..**agmd.gov/hoine!library/clean~air.~plans/air"aualitycmgt-plan/final-2012-air-** • guality"management-plan · ·
1

# •

• Reasonably Available Control Technology [)emonstration 

### RACT EVALUATION The 2016 AQMP RACTBemonstration analysis provides an update to the corresponding

. analyses discussed above. In conducting the review, staff worked closely with the U.S.

EPA·adhering to the provided criteria and guidance. Since the 2012 AQMP submittal, the U,S. EPA has not issued new Control Technique Guidelines (CTG) forVOC sources and Alternative Control Techniques (ACTs) documents for VOC and NOx 

### sources. Regardless, the 2016 AQMP R:ACT analysis evaluated more than 30 rules recently developed and 

### I 

### ot amended by other ozone nonattainment air 

### districts from September 2012 to March 2014 (Table 1). The air 

### districts in California included:
• Bay Area Air 

### Quality Management District (BAAQMD) • SanJoaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (SNAPCI)) • Sacramento Metro Air 

### Quality Management District (SMAQMD) • Mojave Desert Air 

### Quality Management District (MDAQMD) • Antelope Valley Air Quality Manageμient District (AV AQMD) • Ventura County Air Pollution Control District (VCAPCD) and state agencies for ozone impacted:
• Texas • Maryland • Delaware The evaluation,indicates that BCAQMD rules and regulation closely matched those of the ·other agencies, and only eight.SCAQMD rules covering six source categories were identified for further evaluation. Table 2 is formatted to compliment the comp;uison summaries presented in the 2007 and2012.AQMP RACM analyses. A brief description of the issues· requiring further evaluation follows. First, SCAQMD Rule 223 applies to large confined animal facilities while the companion 

### SNAPCD Rule 4570 has lower thresholds for regulation of dairy and poultry (chicken and duck) facilities
.. Rule 4570 specifies mandatory measures, and ithas livestock feeding time restrictions based on a local feeding practice (wet feed) which is not employed in the Basin where dry 

### feed is u.sed. The primary difference between the rules focuses on the limitation placed on feeding times where the wet feed practice is restricted to two hours duration due to the composition of the feed. SCAQMD Rule 223 has a 48- hour time limit on the dry 

### feedingapplication. More detailed evaluation will be conducted as part of the.2016 AQMP control measure development to determine the applicability of such feeding time restriction on District's sources, and the extension of rule applicability to•certain livestock categories using a lower size threshold
.

2Reasonably Available Control TechnologyDeinonstration Second, BAAQMD (Reg. 8, Rule'33) voe limit for gasoline bulk.terminal and cargo tank operations was foiindto be more restrictive than the companion SCAQMD Rule 462. BAAQMD Rule 33 establishes arrernission iirnit.of0.04 lbs per 1000 gallons of organic.liquid loaded while the SCAQMD Rule462 has 0.081bs per 1000 gallons limit However;the compliance test protocol needs to be further compared to determine the applicability ·of the emissfons limit• to the District sources. Rule 71.5. of VOAPeD. regulates VOC emissions from glycol dehydrators in natural gas dehydration. voe emissions from glycol dehydration system need to be evaluated to determine if.eXisting SCAQMD Rule 1148.1 and Rule 1i73.ali'eady cover these ennss1ons. SeAQMD Rule 1130 regarding flexographic specialty ink for facilities emitting more than 10 tonsperyear (tpy) is more restrictive"than companion AVAPCD Rule 

### l13b. For facilities that emit .Jess tha:ll 

### IO tolls pet year and thll,t' use less than 2 gailon.s per day and less than I20 gallons per year, Antelope**Vall~y** Rule 1130 has <l· more res_trictive VOC content limit of flexographic specialty illk for flexible· package printing (383 gll) than SeAQMD Rule 1130 (460 g/l for metallic illk and 535 g/l for matte finish ink for no more than 125 gallons per year a:nd 2 gallons pet day)c The seAQMD inventory records indicate that the emission redμcti'on potential for this c.ategory to l:>e•de.111,inimis based on the number of affected facilities (0:006 tons per day (TPD) for all permitted flexographic printing operations in the District). Nevertheless, SeAQMD will analyze the viability of • creati'ilg a new sub-category. · S.(V APCD Rufo4311 regulates flares emitting greater than JO tpy of VOCorNOx regardless**of,source•cat~gory** with the exemption.of municipal solid waste landfills. SeAQMD Rules 1118 and 1'150.1 cover flare emissions (including NOx and Voe) from refineries, sulfurrecovecy plants, hydrogen. production plants, alld landfills. PQtential flare emis.sions;from other District somces need to be evaluated to determine the local applicability ofthe•SNAPCD Rule 4311. Finally, NOx emission rate. limits. fof'cerllent kilns in the Basin are slightly highef (2. 73 vs. 2.3 lbs/ton of clillker) when comparihgSCAQMD Be$t Available Retrofit Control Technology level in.Rule·2002with the BAAQMD Reg. 9, Rule 13. It should he noted that the SCAQMD·averaging time for the.NOx limit is one year using a continuous emission monitoring system while BAAQMD is 30 days. SeAQMD will assess the feasibllity of reducl.ng:NOx emissions from cement kilns .through· the Regional Clean Air Incentives Market program thatproposed .amendments are uilqeryvay. 

### FUTURE EVALUATION While no 11ew CTG**h_a~** been issued sll!ci; the .2012.AQMP submittal, Q.S, EPA staff has suggested that the SCAQMD look into the recent developments of 

## warm mix.asphalt • (WMA) technologies. WMA allows the mixing and. placement of asphalt mix at

3**-R~aJ:i()!!<tb.Jy** Ax!lila1'Je (<m!rolTecl_in<)logy Demonstration**teiiip~r!trute** al>0ut 35to 

### 100°F lower than conventional hotmix asphalt (HMA),resultirtg jnaiecl\Jction offueLconsumption, as well as reduced emissions from.the fiianiifactiliii:ig plarttand.arthe location where the asphaltis 

### iaid. In a white pap¢r 4eveloped by the**,scA:~Mb·in.2008,** staff ccmclUciedthatJower"en_ergy 

## wann miJ<.asphalnechnologies

### w~r~1priaj~iJigri11reQ.u_cing energy·use and reduction in .ai!·emissions; despi1 te the fact
. ·that)IDX!and sti:uctunil desl.'gn, material processing requirements, construction procedures; .ano qualicy·.control:specifications were not yet finalized to .date.· ·**~Ii~** l:Jeenoajcreasingly use_d.i)l the United States, Caltranspromotes the.use of WMA because'-of

### itsrrruiny;imp~ovements over HMA. 

## wMA suppliers.reported 19"50%

.voes reduction**artd;60l~O%** 

### NGh reduction in plant**emis~forts** in Europe, alth6\lg.Q

- 'increased'emissiOns ofVOCs.and 

# co were observed in the United States. The University •

### 6f<;;@foriJii1;fa".~Ili.eritRe~efil'~h Ce)lier

### measu~ed VOCs and

### se~-~olatile organic '

c;omp 0 μn(ls ierr,llssionof'·WMA aqd HMA at the pavementsurface during:construction. Resulfs showe(tthat;dependirtg on the mix type and.the temperature inside the chamtiet; 

### 1\CDC emission flux 

### of WMA. could be higher 

## or lower.than**H~.** Based on c;urrerit

### 'fnfqfi}1~~1QJh**tQe•~miss_ion,repuction** of WMA technology is highly uncertain.

### Ther~fore, -**s~f;sμggests;fui1her** evaluation ofthe emission reduction and cost-effectiveness'for 

# WMA technology as part 

### of the 

### 2016 control measure development. '



## . C0NQL:USJON

Overall, forthe 

### 2016 AQMJ> RACT Demonstration, SCAQMb makes the following**.finding~:** 

## l. S<::'A:QMD's C:urr.ent rules, in large part; meet the U.S. EPA's criteria for RACT accepiiibility andindusion in:,the SIP.

· _

2'. SCAQMD cominits fo f_liftljer,eyaluate the six categories identified above for potential.emission reductions as part of the 

### 2016 AQMPcontrol.development.

4' I I I Reasoriabl\i Available ControlTechriologyJ?emoristratiori Table i**.Rul~sEvaluated·r'&t~;\.CTI>emonstra(ion** 

## san. r oaquiil 

## vauey.Aii,Pollutfori 

## control ' Dis'trici _'..", ___ , ___ -**~** , Rufo•Nun\ber/Title
. . . , , Rule)4308f(Boilers,**Steaiii,Qelfefatiks;,1al!i:li~r~essi.H~tefs);** R.lile·t!'.:H! (F,fares); ,Riile14570•(Corifiried!**A.riifuaJ;Fai:ilities);'RUle>4605_~Aefcispace**

.

### Asse!!itiif1!!rri:l~~o111poi;i~11tJ!:(J~@E);**~!!Ii 4_/i&J'~(G.11~!;\!i!'e'.~~~~',iii.!'2** 

.Motor;**Veliicle)~** Rule**~622 .(Oasoline'Transfer.1ih~o·,**  Stiitionacy·':1ltorage; 

### ! I Containers); !Rule 4702 '(Iritemal oGombustion Ehgihes);

### and~Rufo;96l0 

### : I**<siP;Ci@id~ii-;'Emfss16[Raitii:ti6~i:'** 

### .... '
.• . . . :Nent\lfa,,C()uJl\y16ir Pollutio_n,C.ont:r,0 1'E>i*!ct 

### i i fu!Ie'**S.1:!!~#~c'G~~.CJ.l!!'!ds);i:E'.!!!(1?&? ,S9lyc;<;>l~,D~hy_clra!ors);**  1 Rule

, 7431.1;1(1.i'11:ge**~l!ter(H~tersj@Q** §@!I**J:Joil~r~kRule~Z4'l3., (J\~,Q~Pl!f.!l**  'AssembJ):,anct:Coll)poneiihManufactlliiilgJ';**Riile174:~5,'l** ;(Boilers,.**~ream** ,**G.~!l~r:iJor!t ~c!,f~g<:!'.[s,f,!~!.!1f~~;** **·l{IJ!~J(!2** 

### <§@P!&c.**t\ri,S~; R111e,'?41~P.**  (;t\dlfe5ives 'hlio, •Searrults); Rule, '74.24 (M_:iririe,_1§oatings); and :KuJ(<' 

# ... ·**~ ~~-**  _ .• l74'.:31(MeralworKing.FJuiCis_and:0irechconfact·Ll1brii::arits);·"
_ 

### 13aY,·Afea**Airi~ualit};_~~gemeiit DiStri~F'**  , ;**~eg. 2~**  

## Riile A**~Eliiissfoil~ ~ailki\[g);** **~~;** 3, 

### :(Fees}**R~g:** ;s, 

## ·(ope,;r

,

### (!!~g);;;R~g,, g,_1E;uJ.t;

### ~1~Mt<!~l.'.Resycling1and'. Shreclcfui.g: Opt;f'.ltions)} · ' !'Reg. i8; RUie; :33J 

### (Qasiilih(l· Bullc. 

### Tetiniil!tls,

## :~41**9A~iilih~** J:?!iliyery**~Sacn1lnentol\1e!ro:AIT.Quality,MaI1J!.gelnent** , , District
. ·
I 

### l
.

AJifoJOpe Valley Air Quiility:Maiiagemeiiti 1 lyeliicies); R:_eg,**9("Ru_l~** •10**(Boil~rs_:,** Steam**l?eil,ef~tO,rS:,** ana; .ffocess' , _ 

### ,**,H~ters·** 'in' 

### lI!t:tf.o!¢Kri\:**B,¢t!!l~t)s** 

### ); Jl!)g; ·. 

### 2> 

### _Ku]C!'C!B (J?or•)J!!1<!**'~ll!!C~t!** · _, ;Miiiiiifiicthlifiii); anmReiL12;JRiifo 13\<FoundfY,illfdrEoririiiiiZOiJei'ations) · ,

• rRiile· 10}

### '~Altefillltive; GQWPJi1\1lce);

### Rii!~;,:.7Q5**{~ol.!J!l1~-tritx Jl~~~!!**  

### ·.**~:P1iofitY,** '1Res·erve Bfillk)JJ :RJlie1 301**~eiillif ;Fee~);**  lfjid :Rufo, ·3Q6. 

## tAH

, c'FoxicsrFees)1'--
__ _ , ._

, 1 District•
. .· . ·.· .·. . . , · : , Texas Commission on Envifoririientitl @ality I [.R,iiJe.'101b'**~Fil~~re** to; Attaifr Fee);**Rule~JQlh':(Erriissfo~** 

## :E\;iiitki1lg; and 1 '
. ,**i;I~!l~~;;'RJ!J~_ IQ6,~** **C1-g~7!l!!,l~'~\I Pi,1V~ll)e_!11);,:,Rule**  1()6 10**~9il:~d** Gas);;
.

. cRule lllbl(Outdoor Burnmg); Rμl!l)'.l:lc ;(Nat1Qrtal .Enns.s1on**SJand_ar_~:** I ';for Hazardous Air Polllitiilits); RUle1 a'l4b (Motor Vehicle: rAiiti,**~** - ! 1- _.,.. __ -_ •• _"'-
__ -- ,-, - -·.-**-~--** -""-

- '.-'·•_

--- • - '**~-.·-'··"-** - - _- _--_--.-·

ltaillpe1i!!gk**Bil.1~1** l'.14,!:**{:\(ehicleJii~t>-~ti~!j .@ll~_M,ajpte113n~¢);**  J{l!lfi ;lf S!l -' ·**f,{sii'i'face~coa:tin'1fProcesses);.-aiiCl'Ruie** N7d'(MmoNSourcesl

- ' '**l~~~~~~,,.,,,,~~~~~=-"~""",-,=~l'-'-~="'~~~.,,,..~-,-'-"'-"""'--,,-'~~~~~,-'--~.,-,~-"7-,,,.-~~~~** .· ·, E>efawar!lDepaithiertt'cif1NaflJra[Res9ufces 1**\geg?ll'•rns~** Secti.Qiii6'.Qf(Cliroml\l**rri'J~:I~!!~P1-~\i!lg!aJ1d** 

### An@i.?'fu!l**I~);•**

.**'~and';EnvrronffienLCorifrol** · . ,_ '**'~geg.** lB8, 1'Sedioii 10;0 (Rfatilig aridlRoiis!iiilg"OperatioiiS).;,ano :Reg.**~~··"---·-,_-** __ ··_ ----··--,·-- - - ..-"" - -«r-**.~** - ,- - --- ---•, ·:-· .. ;: 1· H3s,·section· 1•7:0•(Preoared FeedsdManufacturiflg:;Facilities) _ ' :



### -- 5!. "

# • • •
Rea8onably Available Control Technology Demonstration 

### Table.2· Evaluation of SCAQMD Rules and Regulations
RULE TYPE RULE TITLE CURRENT REQUIREMENTS OTHER DISTRICTS' 2012-2014 RULES EVALUATION (2016 AQMP RACT) 223 voe Emission Rule 223 applies to large'coilfiried San Joaqu_in Villley**Rute'4~?0** (Amend_ed 'SOuthelil Cal_i_fOiliia dairy industries generally Reduction Permits animal**fa~ilities** {CAF). It iequ_ires_ IOfll/10)**~g\i)~teS.Jilrge,CAF** whil_e us_i_ng a use _dry _lo(daiJ:ies. in comparison-With**~~e** for Large**oWn_eJ'.sloperati~ns_** to ob_ia.in a permit lower applicability threshold for**~iry** (500**COnlJ!lOD,~ctice** of feeding wet __ corn.silage in Confined Anima1 describing the control measures the n:ii_lking cows) and p,oul_try (400,000 for both lhe Central Vaitey
.. The**~ore.stringen1.feeding** Facilities (acili_ty**c~ooses** to implement-from a chicken and di.Jck) facilities, and: it has more reqt.iirement;in.Rule 4570 may not be (Adopted" 612106) list of mitigation- measure**stri~gent** requirements iit the following areas: apjlliCable·at SCAQMD:**requir~rnents. Admiiri~lrative**  • Tirilefl'.ame·for feedif!g**to~I** mixed rations MOTe ci.etiiiled eval'uation.will.be conducted as require!"llents·such as record,keeping i.n the.dairy.feed.menu is 2 hours**p-<ll1.ofthe-7616~~QM~'contfoi ~sure**  and noticing are also needed. •Specify· both mandatory and option.iii development to determine.the applicabilily of '**miti~ion_** measure sui:h,feeding-time reStriction on Districc's Sources, ilnd the extension of the-rule appliciibiliCy'tO 

### daines**a~d.certilin** POultry facilities using a lower size threshold. SCAQMD.staff wil1'continue to reach out and solicit input from potentially impacted st.a,keholders and assess the feasibility**~f** reducini! emissiOns in future rule makina. 462 voe**Org~ic** LiQuid Limit in,Rule 462 is·0.08 lbs per Bay Area, Regulation 8, Rule 33 (Amended SCAQMD staff will compare compliance test Loading 1000 gallons of**liqu~d** loaded for 4/15/09) has a limit of0.04 lbs per. 1000 protocols to determine applicabilitfto our (Amended Class.A facility loading·of20,000 gallons of liquid loaded and requires emis_sion sources: SCAQfylD staff will. 5/14/99) gallons or more. Thi_s·limit is not stringent.monitoring requirements. continue to_assess the feasibility**ofred~~ing** applicable to sma!I facilities (Class B the voe limits as part of the 2016 AQMP and CJ. control measure develooment. 1118 NOx, Control of • Minimize flare erriissions & San Joaquin Valley Rule 4311 (Amended SCAQMD Rule 1150._1 COvfr.s flare erilissionS 1150.I voe Emissioi:is from**~quire** smokeless.operations 6/18/09) has VOC/NOx limits for.ground- from active landfills,**~d** SCAQMD R·ule 11 is Refinery Flares • Specify S0 2 gradua11y decreasing level enclosed flares; S0 2 Targets ( 1.50. also applies !o:hydrogen pr()(,fuction and sulfur (Amended performance target to" less**th~n** 0.5 ton!W'million barrels of crude by 2011, and recovery facilities. ft.should be noted that the I i/4/05)**~ons** per million.baITels of crude' by 0.5 tons/million barrels ·by 2017); Flare SJVAPCD Rule.,4311 exempts emergency'. Use 2012. Minimiza_tioil P\an for,refinery flares _IJlo.re of flares. SCAQMD:Staff.will evaluate flare • If.the performance target is 'than. 5 mmbtu/hr; and operntional emissiOns from sources other than.refineries,**e~ce~e~.** t_he Oj>erator mu st I) pay reqLiirements for all flares that have hydrogen production, sulfur recovery facilities**rriiiiga~ion** fee; or.2)· submi_t a Flare potential to emit more than I0 tons/yr voe and.laiidfills for potential controls.

Mi_tigation Plan to.reduce and'more than 10 tons/yr of NOx. emissions •**Require'Cau~e** Am.ilysis for event**ex~,e&ii1'g** l()(J l,bs·,voc, 500 lbs of

S0 2 , l?_r-500,000.scfm of Vent gas, excluding planned shutdown, startup and turnarounds • Require 160**ppm\'.~H S,**  3'houi

average by Jllf7Q99, and_**~o** limits for··NOx, VOC,-PM-and CO. 6Reasonably**Av~ilable·•C:ontiolTechnolOgy** Deinollstration

.RULE!**'TYPE~** I H-1301

·1148:1 }i73 

## Voe ' RULE TITLE· .Gna)>hicrAits ""'
. !.(Ame,nded 5/2Jl4)

·oiJ:aJfd_aas "PrndUCtiOO-:We1_1s**(Adofo~ii:Ji5i(/4>** 

### Table 

### :Z

.Evaluation 

### ofSGAQN1D Rules**and'l~.egulations•(c9ntin,u~c1).** ··CURRENTREQUIREMENTS'_ RUie] l l30)illows JOr, higher :VOC 1cOnteiit For-·maite'(5Js,gn)·and, :. ·nietii11 iC'**flCXO~j)hiC:** ilikS '(460: g/J)_'**,-~ct®~iP,~~I~~~tiS~~!t!9f** 1
: facilitie_s_thafe_niit.Ie_ss**_tha_n\1_0_.~ons**

;: pe!!Yefil\anlfihat**u~e-JC:ss _than:~{**  ·gai1on·s_per:c1.iiy.and ·Jess than 125
,**~!if~S~ P~_(Y~-:~[:_!!l~~sJt~~~-fE** **~~·**

i1 1**'!-~'~ _t_M_~:'t:~~~~~~S'~%:--**  : 1,.e·mission_s:from·wellheads;,Well 0THERDISTRICTS'!2012-2014·RULES. EVALUATION.(2016AQMP.RACT)**For·faCilities~that** eri:tit Jess· than 1 IO,tons:Rer:**~ ·:SCAQlv!D;g~!~-~~:U9J!<!~** ..**~-~p}i_!:Jl_~nc_lf_d** ,_ year.and.that Use'iess tban·-2;.g.iilOm(per.'<iaY·: 'pursuant**to,u~s.** EPA'_CTO
..**It.is._in·g~eral** ?fid•less·1h·an:.12o·ga11onS'Pef·.yeii.r.·cif tlfe1

-- !equi vaJent**to.~or. more··smligenfthan~ltie;**  S'-"'--cifi&{ihk; Aliful --= i.Vii1Je' 1 RUie'J'130 --COID"" iiiiiOi:liUle 'ifr**Ai"itei~-<EVWiiy ~**  ._ __**._,~, ·--·-'"'~~-~~** **~~-""~Y**....**,·-.·~·~~,-~** \,"""" R,,
.., . ..,..-,_,__ .... ,.,.,,. ..... - --,,__ .... - ·!J,=c.·.**~!~-'?{~ Xt?.~Th!gh~.r~N'9,G,;fQ_!!tel)_!_** **w~"-~· ,:§.~~pff2~&!~!li!i"l'.S~!.!!1!t~fuit!~-~~..t~~!** **~­ _(5_35;·~)**  .iJnd**~etiilic,nex~graPhic** (46<},gii):.**~tons,~1,y~,_aQd~h<!t** ..**~~J~~~:~~~,_2Jgi!!!pn~S**..**ii:Jks·us:eci:on·non~porous,sUl::istiates;'and}he** '
1 • P.l;r.day.iind:less than**120_-~lons_:p~,year** .voe content'liffi.it:isJS3'gt1 1for ·metai'1ic· ., ,'(i25rgaifuns;per.yew--fur**sCAQMD~ol~** ink'Tu<i, maite: fi**iliSh~** iilk""f'a·y,1 iea on. neXi ble · '. riexOgljptiiCTSpeciattf**ink~** :Aiiei0p·e'.,vw1ey,**-~~k·age,print~g~-- ~·"** 

### ___ P · ---**---~---** ---· · -·- iRUie**1:J'30'rmr-;r-more-restticii~e'vbc-:conten1**

## j~~~1f:t~~:~~~~;~s~r~1~- 

# ..**,----~--** 

# ·

RUIC 71·:5:or venturifCOi.mtf (Adotned**''.SCAQMD:Rulf~l,130 (46o.~:for.meta11iC**  irik;**·.aE_dJ·~-~'i0** for-mane:lliifSh'ifik):
.**Ttie~SGAQMD:iiiVeiltOi'" ~recofdS'.indiCaiC~tha(** **_,···-~** ··- --·.-.-,,··"'"- ._**-~-·-** ...**-_,,.c:--_.Y;-.~,..-='";7~ ;--.s.~,..,--.,-_,.**  ,the**.em1_ss1on~** re_dUctJ.on**~tenllal** for.**~this_** 1:-categoiy· tO:'k 

### ·1-di".''.;,;fnimi-S:--:basecr:an, the ·,numb"ef",'ofiaffCcteCi' faCUities,ibut; staff 1wiff**<COiitinue~_toin·ssess1the· _fiasibilit)'~/ofrreduci·ng** **ttK~···Y-9~c~!lJPIW:@TP?E.ilfl~~l~Q}~.ki\Q¥~** 

### · coril?rot'imeasure Cleveloomeni.,

-**,,'.·c~_pW:S~**iin:d,·,**ii~tr-~~-~-~~~~** gas_ ai**~ \'oil~**  anCt:**gas_.pi"~ductioil:** operatjons. -·This ru1e·reQuires'Ccincen'tratiOn···af.**.l"?Jl3_(9,1i~R.-i91~: Y9£,~~~-~i-~liE:~~h.1**  !**~YC(l! q_~.~Y-d!'.1:tt¥S_"u_sed** **!R})~tu!!li,gl!S_** dCh'ydration:tliroUgh::
_

### :.~ii~;;~~~~:;:~~ii.~rmf~ri~~l~trom**jg!Y§P!;~~~Y.#r!~f~~-~,!§~8ti,** 

### :_ . ,Rules_.l l48!_l**_(Oil'and'GasProqllction,,~eUS),** (A)-**Condenser'ivapor_disposal~'or** 

# ,·**k~#!Tufw~.(~%~~~?~t¥** I**-:~good_J1lal1:Rgemen~ p~~ces-~or_.the**  fStorage·and**iransfei-~of or~ic**  '(B)_ FlcireJifJCirieril:Or, cir

-

·-**,,-(CXt~-~s_iO~.~~~@i_r~~-~~fef(J~(~j?litfOI~**

gl yc_ol r_egenerator. venr VOC · emi ssiOns by ai·1e.st·9s%: ·**1',.1l!Q~~~~71~fui~Si_~]S'pf,JlroCl,U~ed·,ga~ !f:.Sli~.pe_:s~!I~~)iff~.I.cfli~!!@~~y--** 

if**(~)_{A·** syS!).i:n**h_andU.~g:~.'.for~-~~l.** i saJe;·or.underground-iiljectiOn; or' ,.(B)rA: deviCe,\Viih a:VQCTvapOc '.';;reffiovai,'effiCieilC)i','demonstfu1ed tO' .'·**·lle1aiieiSt'.9s-%\-b.._,~~e(hi·Or6..,._.** ; ; .",__...-
___ .. ,.'"**-~··--'··** .... Y ..,,., _g_·--'--·-·. Y ,1**).de_m9ns~!i_n,g ~,Ql;i_tlet** **~yoc** ,. concentiation-of-50 nnm.
7 I · anCi!i" · i«?j :. (teaks' ft.om •Peuoieum f**8.Ci'iiti~S):** ;s-CAQMD-:Staf(wiii-eviifi.iate,:voc··emissiOns

,**l!om:wr~-C!1~d-~~y~_or(SY:~-~=@.:_, _** 


# •.,,,**~** ........ , 

## ...**~** 

## . ,._; ,_ '· .;;;,·**~.** :·; _ •• ::.._ 1, ·:' 

### '.,



### ,,- '

.**-·~**

<- 2002'• -TYPE- -RULETITLE;**AJlocatiOO~;** ror:**'O~aes:of'.** 

### -- ,Nitrogen·
.. and 'OXides (N6x) ;'of.Sulfui"·· ·tAmenCted: .1'1islio>

•,**'~·** '**---~---** •· .........**~~-~~------** .....**-~.-:::....:;-.-;--** ... -,



### . '. 

## "·-"**~ 1~** 



# -·**~-,­** 

### ·-- '. - ,. -,
. -,, , -- " -: ;_,if.·.

.- •-.f ··:.. :- '
....... j.;;_-**--.f-~** ' 

### • · ,., J'atiie·2
_ _ . 

### Evaluation.

## of'$ct\QMDfili°lli~;iiria R.e@iations {c<:ifitiilued)

- ., __**-~-~-.·----·-{ ---~** **·---=-~ ·---~·----:""··,~**  - •o, .----- -·"·oc-·..,.
.._._-,_- __ ..., _I ,,C ,. . .- CURRENT REQUIREMENTS._ The·curi'ent best available retrofit ' f- •

J.• ..i·,

:_c:Qntroi-.tOCh.iOfOgy·'(liARCT)'iS''.fi3_

.**ib~on~** of cJfnker.**:BaY._.A.f¢;l;':RC_gl,ililti_o~·9,-_.1,l_ille·_1~:(Ad~p_tCd·~** ,**~-~-A9~R,-~.1~~-:t~--~-c~-,~~~ri.(~!~-~- :9/Ji]/_l-~)~-!~i!ij,t_s:~**  ..**e-n:i!ssi_o_ns_:ofn!~i~~** ··**e~ssions_.t11rougl:l _the_S~A,QMD.~s**  Contlo_l oxides,:.'particuJare1m<ltter, anCI loxic ai_T MeaSUr_e'cMB"i-Oi._::/FurthCr:Ifecfuctions "frOfn :-OOritanliRiintS ·fi.oini'h'e1 manufacture of.**NOx--R-EC:'C~~.{~CUry-ent n.11e~i~g**  __ ··POit1aiiCl'cemen1:.
. ·proposes tO**IO~et.the;-curreRt** BARCT.-limifof



### - ..**!JEO~Nl!~g-:_cJ!y _r(>ll_i~g-~ly~g~** __**~f ~~:J~oeT~~~t~O~i~~@~~~(,:fh_~** **-~0Ji9~**

nitr<>8;en:oXides' emissionsfrom-the kiln amendment to the·NOx RECEAIM:is', Shai11Jiot·exce'ed.i3::pounds.per.t0n·:or-'**CUC~ntl.Y uRderWa~.--**  - - ·- - - -- - -· difiker Pti>dUCCd;
.**~ThT"30~peI:itiDi_daY** r_ol_li_Rg aye_rage _of-:
_**totlf,hfdroc~bon** .-;_emissi-Onsfrom the-kiln: Shii.11 nol'exceed24 ppmv. ·dry. at-7._ percent ·oxygen:; _or as**a~atteJR-~tiv·e~** ·provided the**Pic>.v~_S_iO~s Ors~-~-00.9.:1_3_493** **~ave** be_en**cOnip_1etf<l.:tl!e~~~OP~~!1g** _day:.:roi_l_i_ilg-- average_ Of to_tal_:orga:nic Hazardous:·A_ir Poliutints (HAP):CmlssiOns ·from' the. kiIIl**S_haIF~Ot ~Xc~ed**  ., 12 ·1:1pmv
.. dr)";**~t** .7. ·percent OXVi!en:

. 8 • i -**--~;:** 

### .

.**--~.,-** ,.•.; .·**~:'d** '"**""'~.** ,- .< .. •., /.



### -'"
, 

## . __ ;.

# I .. ., 

### ,. ,· ( '

I. I

# ~;'. -·'· ·.·


# ..

.-

. 

### ·'**···~·~** _\"."·**~-**



# . . 

## ..
"::.; " ,;· : : -::,**-~·.·** 1"•


## - .-::;·**.,~:;·**

,·



### -·

•!


### ·. ·'

- -·· . '·" 

### -. :-,.**~ 7~.----**  =''**:~_._**

''·



### ... 

# .•. - ..:_; .**~~i ·r::.~T9.~~**  ·-=· .• _.. ,"'\. "•"-:I.". 

### .,.

,,.. r.,; r. _';.,:.,.:,;! t:' I**·~1**

_..•
- '-;!. .!



# .,
;,, 

## .... 

## ·. L ',-'.' J
...

·:-!· ', '. 

## '· . . 

## -**~** 

## - . 0- -' l,.

. f\; .._ 

# . .. '

r. c-.**~-** .. l !
. 1•;

1· '.

:!;'·



# .
--:,•.



# .. .·.

·::-.:'
..s·.- ....**-.~r..;:· ;11~-** **~-** ..

·::-.- ,.:;J**-~** 

## ..

. •'



## . '· 

# .. I : '-'**.~** .:, .,_,__

.. ;, 

### ..**~·** ' .. •f .:.' 'J:.'".T.': "-".• 

### <--**1..-.~·** " 

# .....

_,_ - 

# •

·'I'. •,';;o'**~-;,~~**

- . ·..:...**~** . 

## ..-· 

## . ._· .

### ..**-·~** ., .- 

# .

..... 

### ..·

- 't
.



## ..**:~~1** ·

. \,•

./'· 

# -.r. :.

.;t::**~):._~ .:~** **~-** 

### . 

# ... ,; .;-:I

. '.'-,i·.-
..

. ' ' 

### .

. - <' • 

## -··· '::': ._,·.

;_:**~**

### ..

_ 

## . .**~** ... ,' .-- ..**~** ,..s../**M,.~** _,:· '·



### , . ' ·,: 1!:>



# ..**:~** 0 

### -'**~~** 

### ' 

## .. ,

i

;)

### i I·

I ' 

# .

-· , 

## ..

'' 

## . ---.,--.----..---.- 

### -.-." ---;;,,.-- --**~.~,**

,. ..i



# . '

; __ . 

## REFERENCES

-**~'** - ., .. , 

## ·1. Wann-.Mix Asphalt:' 

## European.Pl-actice;.I.ftternati<>nai iechh<>l<>gy; $caI1hjiig · Program,**Flfwh\~PLcOS'-007,,** 

### Fefirti!ll'y 

## 2QO$,J;JlwA"fWIE>,V:!i, (Departme11t of**~ransporta.tion,** 

### Wa.sl:tingtQn, 

## pc,**us~.** 

### (www.intemationalJnwa.dot:gov) 2. Farshidi •.**F~&Jones,** 

### b:& Kumar, A.& 

## Green, P.d,& Hawey,.J:t., 

### ''biiect**•fueasiJr~m-ents** 

### ..**6fV9Ja~le·anclsem1_y()J<]Jil~ org[1lic•CO[IlPQl!Ild~fromi1lc)t;;and•WarJI1**  

### !Ili.x·.a:sphaJtP 

### ,'frahsp Res Bqa,rd,**~QL** 

### 2207, 201J; p.l-10
.

'

R-J j



## . ,[



## ... ,

-1' 'I 

### ·I