alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2  I, Dempsey Mork, certify that:  1.           I have reviewed this quarterly report for the period ended Sept. 30, 2007 on Form 10-Q of Knickerbocker Capital Corp.;  2.           Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.           Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.           The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a)           Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b)           Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c)           Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.           The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)           All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b)           Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  Nov. 19, 2009   /s/ Dempsey Mork Dempsey Mork Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit      10.51**

**PUGET      ENERGY, INC. & PUGET SOUND ENERGY, INC.**

**DIRECTOR      COMPENSATION EFFECTIVE MARCH 1, 2007**

| DIRECTOR                COMPENSATION                                                                                    |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Quarterly                Lead Independent Director Retainer                                                             | $                  3,750 |
| Quarterly                Board Member Retainer**(a)**                                                                   | 20,000 |
| Additional                Quarterly Retainer for Audit Committee Chair                                                  | 2,500 |
| Additional                Quarterly Retainer for Audit Committee Members                                                | 1,000 |
| Additional                quarterly retainer for Compensation and Leadership Development Committee                Chair | 2,000 |
| Additional                Quarterly Retainer for Governance and Public Affairs Committee Chair                          | 1,500 |
| Fee                for Each Board and Board Committee Meeting Attended                                                  | 1,600 |
| Fee                for Each Telephonic Meeting Attended Lasting 60 Minutes or Less                                      | 800 |

| (a)   | 100%                of the quarterly retainer fees are to be paid in the form of Puget                Energy                shares until a director owns a number of Puget Energy shares equal                in                value to two years of retainer fees. After meeting this ownership                requirement, under the terms of the Non-Employee Director Plan as                currently in effect, a portion of the quarterly retainer payable                to a                director for a fiscal quarter is payable in a number of shares of                Puget                Energy stock determined by dividing two-thirds of the quarterly retainer                payable by the fair market value of Puget Energy’s common stock on the                last business day of that fiscal                quarter. |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 49 (Thursday, March 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 11855]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6281]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. CP97-274-000]


NorAm Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

March 7, 1997.
    Take notice that on March 3, 1997, NorAm Gas Transmission Company 
(NorAm), 525 Milam Street, Shreveport, Louisiana 71151, filed in Docket 
No. CP97-274-000 a request pursuant to Sections 157.205 and 157.212 of 
the Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 157.205, 157.212) under the 
Natural Gas Act (NGA) for authorization to construct and operate a 
delivery tap to Quincy Soybean Corporation (Quincy) located in Phillips 
County, Arkansas under the authorization of Section 7 of the Natural 
Gas Act (NGA), for Part 284 transportation services by NorAm, under 
NorAm's blanket certificate issued in Docket Nos. CP82-384-000 and 
CP82-384-001, all as more fully set forth in the request that is on 
file with the Commission and open to public inspection.
    NorAm proposes to install a two-inch L-shaped meter station, a 
four-inch tap, relief valve, electronic flow measurement and 425 feet 
of 8\5/8\ nominal piping that will extend from NorAm's Line TM-2 
through the Quincy yard to the cogeneration plant in Phillips County, 
Arkansas. NorAm indicates that the cost of these facilities is $36,274. 
NorAm asserts that Quincy has contracted for an additional 1,000 MMBtu 
per day with estimated deliveries of 365,000 MMBtu on an annual basis.
    NorAm states that it will transport gas to Quincy and provide 
service under Rate Schedule FT of NorAm's FERC Gas Tariff. NorAm 
further states that its tariff does not prohibit the addition of 
delivery points and that NorAm has sufficient capacity to accomplish 
the deliveries without detriment or disadvantage to its other 
customers.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of 
the Regulations under the natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, 
the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-6281 Filed 3-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 140 (Thursday, July 21, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 47489]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-17309]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Fourth Meeting Special Committee 235, Non-Rechargeable Lithium 
Battery and Batteries

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Fourth Meeting Special Committee 235, non-rechargeable lithium 
battery and batteries.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of Fourth Meeting Special Committee 235, Non-Rechargeable 
Lithium Battery and Batteries.

DATES: The meeting will be held August 16-17, 2016, 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 
p.m. Tuesday, 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Wednesday.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at: RTCA, Inc., 1150 18th Street 
NW., Suite 450, Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karan Hofmann at khofmann@rtca.org or 
(202) 330-0680 or The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street NW., Suite 
910, Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at (202) 833-9339, fax at 
(202) 833-9434, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is 
hereby given for a meeting of the Fourth Meeting Special Committee 235, 
Non-Rechargeable Lithium Battery and Batteries. The agenda will include 
the following:

Tuesday, August 16, 2016--8:30 a.m.-5:00 p.m.

1. Welcome and Administrative Remarks
2. Introductions
3. Agenda Review
4. Meeting #3 Summary Review and Approval
5. Action Item Review
6. Status Report of Working-Group Leaders
     WG-1--New DO-227A MOPS Template and Section 1
     WG-2--Cell and Battery Requirements
7. Review Draft DO-227A Comments
8. Member company input on Thermal Runaway Test
9. FAA Tech Center Testing Update
10. Review of program schedule
11. Action Item Review
12. Any other Business
13. Date and Place of Next Meeting
14. Adjourn

Wednesday, August 17, 2016--8:30 a.m.-4:00 p.m.

Continuation of Plenary or Working Group Sessions

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on July 15, 2016.
June Green,
Procurement Services Division, ANG-A1, NextGen, Procurement Services 
Division, Federal Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. 2016-17309 Filed 7-20-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
# Population Estimates

# Registration

# Ballots Counted

# Turnout Source

# Absentee

# Provisional

# DropOff

# Over & Undervotes

# Voting Equipment

# Poll Workers

# Polling Places

# Disability

# Look Up
# C_2022138EN.01002501.xml

| 28.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/25

---

Action brought on 20 January 2022 — Romedor Pharma v EUIPO — Perfect Care Distribution (CERVIRON Perfect Care)

(Case T-38/22)

(2022/C 138/29)

Language in which the application was lodged: Romanian

Parties

Applicant: Romedor Pharma SRL (Focşani, Romania) (represented by: E. Dicu, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Perfect Care Distribution (Bucharest, Romania)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark CERVIRON PERFECT CARE — EU trade mark No 18 064 805

Procedure before EUIPO: proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 17 November 2021 in Case R 521/2021-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | uphold the action as formulated and reasoned; |
| --- | --- |

—

uphold the action as formulated and reasoned;

| — | annul the contested decision and, consequently, uphold the application for a declaration of invalidity in respect of EU trade mark No 18 064 805. |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision and, consequently, uphold the application for a declaration of invalidity in respect of EU trade mark No 18 064 805.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 60(1)(c), in conjunction with Article 8(4), of Regulation (EU) No 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 60(1)(c), in conjunction with Article 8(4), of Regulation (EU) No 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 99 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 99

     To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide additional 
 aggravating factors for the imposition of the death penalty based on 
                       the status of the victim.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2019

 Mr. Buchanan introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide additional 
 aggravating factors for the imposition of the death penalty based on 
                       the status of the victim.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Thin Blue Line Act''.

SEC. 2. AGGRAVATING FACTORS FOR DEATH PENALTY.

    Section 3592(c) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting after paragraph (16) the following:
            ``(17) Killing or targeting of law enforcement officer.--
                    ``(A) The defendant killed or attempted to kill, in 
                the circumstance described in subparagraph (B), a 
                person who is authorized by law--
                            ``(i) to engage in or supervise the 
                        prevention, detention, investigation, or 
                        prosecution, or the incarceration of any person 
                        for any criminal violation of law;
                            ``(ii) to apprehend, arrest, or prosecute 
                        an individual for any criminal violation of 
                        law; or
                            ``(iii) to be a firefighter or other first 
                        responder.
                    ``(B) The circumstance referred to in subparagraph 
                (A) is that the person was killed or targeted--
                            ``(i) while he or she was engaged in the 
                        performance of his or her official duties;
                            ``(ii) because of the performance of his or 
                        her official duties; or
                            ``(iii) because of his or her status as a 
                        public official or employee.''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2023235EN.01003802.xml

| 3.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 235/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 235/38

---

Judgment of the General Court of 17 May 2023 — moderne Stadt v EUIPO (DEUTZER HAFEN KÖLN)

(Case T-657/22) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for EU word mark DEUTZER HAFEN KÖLN - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Equality of treatment)

(2023/C 235/52)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: moderne Stadt Gesellschaft zur Förderung des Städtebaues und der Gemeindeentwicklung mbH (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: G. Simon and L. Daams, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Klee, acting as Agent)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 24 August 2022 (Case R 2196/2021-5).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders moderne Stadt Gesellschaft zur Förderung des Städtebaues und der Gemeindeentwicklung mbH and the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear their own respective costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders moderne Stadt Gesellschaft zur Förderung des Städtebaues und der Gemeindeentwicklung mbH and the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear their own respective costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 472, 12.12.2022.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10QSB FOR THE FISCAL QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                       6,340,322
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  3,982,128
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      37,894,130
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                    152,582,630
<ALLOWANCE>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             213,219,827
<DEPOSITS>                                 164,323,096
<SHORT-TERM>                                22,651,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          4,707,394
<LONG-TERM>                                  6,064,000
<COMMON>                                         4,092
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,800,766
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             213,218,827
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              6,639,566
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,117,887
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                41,753
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             7,799,206
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           3,366,709
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             895,559
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        3,536,938
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  150,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              3,549,893
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                458,109
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   316,674
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .77
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,173
<LOANS-PAST>                                       498
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,955,119
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   27,754
<RECOVERIES>                                     9,007
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            2,085,372
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         2,085,372
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
# C_2022418EN.01004702.xml

| 31.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 418/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 418/47

---

Action brought on 1 September 2022 — Hästens Sängar v EUIPO — Mustang (Checked pattern in blue and white with white horses)

(Case T-546/22)

(2022/C 418/61)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Hästens Sängar AB (Köping, Sweden) (represented by: M. Johansson, R. Wessman and S. Ljungblad, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Mustang — Bekleidungswerke GmbH & Co. KG (Schwäbisch Hall, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union pattern mark representing a checked pattern in blue and white with white horses — Application for registration No 18 161 231

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 June 2022 in Case R 1733/2021-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision in so far as it annuls the decision of the Opposition Division based on the conclusion in paragraph 39 of the contested decision that ‘[o]verall the signs [of the applicant and the opponent] are similar’; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision in so far as it annuls the decision of the Opposition Division based on the conclusion in paragraph 39 of the contested decision that ‘[o]verall the signs [of the applicant and the opponent] are similar’;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs incurred by the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs incurred by the applicant.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council and the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council and the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union.

---