alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 52 (Tuesday, March 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 12854]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6819]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Kingstree Knits, a Division of Texfi Industries, Incorporated; TA-
W-32,561 Midway, GA and TA-W-32,516E Kingstree, SC


Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker 
Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 USC 
2273) the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to 
Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on September 17, 1996, 
applicable to workers of Kingstree Knits, a Division of Texfi 
Industries, Incorporated, located in Midway, Georgia. The notice was 
published in the Federal Register on October 1, 1996 (61 FR 51303). The 
worker certification was subsequently amended to include workers at 
other production facilities of the subject firm.
    At the request of petitioners, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. New findings show that 
workers separations have occurred at the subject firm's Kingstree, 
South Carolina location. The workers produce tee shirts for women, men 
and boys.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of Kingstree Knits who were affected by increased imports. 
Accordingly, the Department is amending the worker certification to 
include the workers of Kingstree Knits, a Division of Texfi Industries, 
Incorporated, located in Kingstree, South Carolina.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-32,561 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Kingstree Knits, a Division of Texfi Industries, 
Incorporated, Midway, Georgia (TA-W-32,561) and Kingstree, South 
Carolina (TA-W-32,561E), who became totally or partially separated 
from employment on or after July 11, 1995, are eligible to apply for 
adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 21st day of February 1997.
Russell T. Kile,
Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 97-6819 Filed 3-17-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
No. 11-10283.

#### Dominguez-Gonzalez *v.*Clinton, Secretary of State.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, October 12, 2016. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, October 12, 2016 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A17D0088. KOOL SMILES/NCDR, LLC et al. v. HANSEL GONZALEZ.
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 16A04798
Sl()-l()()82r)-()() 8 

## TOW N O F HIUrO N HEA D ISLAN D One Tow n Ceniei - Court , llilto n Hea d Island , S.C . 2992 8 (843 ) 34J-460 0 Fa

x (843 ) 842-772 8 www.hilionheadislandsc.oo v
M;(jii r K<nn«( h S . Hcil/k c rnuiK'i t Mcmbrr s WiHi c (Uli n Feritusn n HJHbmP.IIarki m Dre w A . l^tiKhli u Joh n .Siifu t (ftffoc rW . Uiltlantk . Jr . Augus t

16,201 0 Th e Honorabl e Ra

y LaHood , Secretar

y U . S . Department

o f Transportatio n 40 0 7 * Street . S W Roo m10200 Washington . D C 2059 0 - o a t\: >

^ o U J m-Of- n

C O

Stcpbci i (•' . Klli'i i Subj : Smal l Communit y Ai r Servic e Development

Grant Applicatio n Docke t OST-2010-0124 , fo

r Savannah/Milto n Hea

d Internationa

l Airpor t (SAV ) Dea r Secretar y LaHood : I a mplease d to suppor

t Savannah/Hilto n Hea

d International Airpor

t i n ii s effor t t o acquire th e Departmen t

o f Transportation' s Smal l Community Air Servic e Development

Progra mGrant . I hav e lon g supporte d th e Airport' s objectiv e of attractin g affordabl e ai r

servic e t o ou

r community . Th e presenc e o f alow-far

e carrier a t Savannah/Hilto n Head Internationa l Airpor t woul d play amajo

r rol e i n satisfyin g th e need s o f

our communit

y and benefi t

bot h Georgi aan

d Sout h Carolina . I hop e tha t th e highes t

consideratio n wil l b e give n t o th e Airport' s applicatio n fo r thi s gran t in a n effor t t o improv e ou

r loca l ai r servic e fo

r th e benefi t

o f busines s an d leisur e traveler s alike , I

t i s crucia l tha t al l communitie s hav e acces s t o a national air

transportatio n syste mwit h competitiv e option s withou t compromis e b

y highe r averag e airfare s when compare d t o other communities . Sincerely . TOW N O F HILTO N HEA

D ISLAND , SOU'r aCAROLIN A nioma s D . Peeple s ^ Mayor
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We  hereby  consent  to  the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the Registration
Statement  on  Form  S-8  (Nos.  333-02033,  2-96616,  33-677, 2-83297, 2-81753,
33-17875,  33-19911,  33-25396,  33-25674  and  333-61073  of the Ralston Purina
Company and Prospectuses thereto, of our report dated October 30, 1998 appearing
on  page  25  of  the  Ralston Purina Company 1998 Annual Report to Shareholders
which  is  incorporated  by  reference  in  this  Annual  Report  on  Form 10-K.


/s/  PricewaterhouseCoopers  LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers  LLP

St.  Louis,  Missouri
December  21,  1998
EXHIBIT 10-39

[Schreiber Logo]


November 3, 2006


David Lipka
19 Oakwood Circle
Roslyn, NY 11576

Dear David:

Please accept the following modifications to the Supply Agreement between Galaxy
Nutritional Foods and Schreiber Foods, Inc., dated June 30, 2005.

Current: The Supply Agreement has a volume penalty clause for volume below a
certain level. The timeframe for the measurement of volume is the second year of
the contract with the opportunity to recover any loss volume in year three
without penalty.

Modification: The timeframe for measurement of volume will be the fifth year of
the Supply Agreement.

Current: The Supply Agreement sets the base level for the volume commitment at
*** pounds. This amount includes blocks to be further processed as well as all
product produced for immediate sale.

Modification: The base level will be reduced by the volume of blocks to be
further processed (*** pounds). Thus, the base level will be set at *** pounds
(*** minus *** pounds).

David, I recognize that there are circumstances which have caused the volume to
be below our respective expectations. I hope that these modifications provide
you relief from the financial burden of this reduced volume. We remain hopeful
that with your new marketing strategy volume can grow to the previously expected
level.

We are committed to the success of Galaxy and to continuing to strengthen the
partnership between Galaxy Nutritional Foods and Schreiber Foods, Inc.

Best regards,

/s/ Ronald J. Dunford

Ronald J. Dunford
President & COO
Schreiber Operations

Acknowledged and agreed to this 9th day of November, 2006

/s/ David H. Lipka
David H. Lipka
Chairman
Galaxy Nutritional Foods, Inc.

***    Indicates material omitted pursuant to a confidential treatment request
       and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
**U.S. Department of Commerce, Economic Development Administration**

1401 Constitution Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20230

**CERTIFICATE OF INDIRECT COSTS – 10% DE MINIMIS RATE**

(1)  In accordance with the requirements set out at 2 C.F.R. § 200.414(f), my organization elects to charge a 10% de minimis rate of modified total direct costs for the period ___________________ **[identify start/end dates for your organization’s fiscal year covered by the indirect cost rate]**.

(2) I certify that my organization does not currently have a negotiated indirect cost rate with the Federal government. 

(3) I certify that my organization currently receives less than $35 million in direct Federal funding per year.

Subject to the provisions of the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1986, (31 USC 3801 et seq.), the False Claims Act (18 USC 287 and 31 USC 3729); and the False Statement Act (18 USC 1001), I declare to the best of my knowledge that the foregoing is true and correct.

Organization Name: 

Signature: 

Name of Authorized Official: 

Title: 

Email Address and Phone: 

Date of Execution:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 49 (Thursday, March 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 11917]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6272]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Loging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Resource 
Conservation and Recovery Act

    Notice is hereby given that a consent decree that addresses claims 
in two Federal Court cases--United States v. Bethlehem Steel 
Corporation, Civ. Act. No. JFM-97-559 (D.Md.) and Maryland v. Bethlehem 
Steel Corporation, Civ. Act. No. JFM-97-558 (D.Md.)--was lodged on 
February 25, 1997.
    The proposed decree resolves the claims of the United States under 
section 3008(h) of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act 
(``RCRA''), 42 U.S.C. 6928, for performance of studies and other 
activities to investigate environmental contamination at the Bethlehem 
Steel plant at Sparrows Point, Maryland. The decree also addresses 
claims brought by the State of Maryland and the Maryland Department of 
the Environment under RCRA and State laws relating to air pollution and 
solid waste disposal. The decree obligates Bethlehem to pay a civil 
penalty of $350,000 to Maryland and, inter alia, to (a) perform a 
comprehensive investigation of contamination at the facility; (b) 
propose a plan for cleanup; (c) take prompt action to address 
conditions that pose a threat to human health or the environment; (d) 
reduce emission of particulate matter into the air; (e) recycle large 
quantities of waste and thereby reduce toxic emissions from the plant; 
and (f) improve management of its solid waste landfills. The United 
States and the State retain their legal authority to require Bethlehem 
to carry out the plan for ultimate cleanup of the facility.
    The Department of Justice will receive, for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication, comments relating to the 
proposed consent decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant 
Attorney General for the Environment and Natural Resources Division, 
Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20530, and should refer to United 
States v. Bethlehem Steel Corporation, DOJ Ref. <SUP># 90-7-1-830.
    The proposed consent decree may be examined at the United States 
Department of Justice, Environment and Natural Resources Division, 
Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street, N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, DC 
20005, (202) 624-0892. A copy of the proposed consent decree may be 
obtained in person or by mail from the Consent Decree Library, 1120 G 
Street, NW, 4th Floor, Washington, DC 20005. In requesting a copy, 
please refer to the referenced case and enclose a check in the amount 
of $22.75 (25 cents per page reproduction costs), payable to the 
Consent Decree Library. Attachments to the proposed consent decree can 
be obtained for additional amount.

Joel M. Gross,
Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural 
Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 97-6272 Filed 3-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Resource America, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jonathan Z. Cohen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                          /s/ Jonathan Z. Cohen
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Jonathan Z. Cohen
                                          Chief Executive Officer
                                          October 11, 2006
<PAGE>

Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of UST Liquidating Corporation. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Barry
S. Rosenstein, Co-Chairman of Board of Directors of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
             15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
             material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
             of the Company.


/s/ Barry S. Rosenstein
----------------------------
Barry S. Rosenstein
Co-Chairman of Board of Directors

A signed original of these written statements required by Section 906 has been
provided to UST Liquidating Corporation and will be retained by UST Liquidating
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
EXHIBIT 32

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                    
|---------------------------------------------
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                      
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of ILX Resorts Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the three months ending March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I (We), Joseph P. Martori, Chief Executive Officer, and Margaret M. Eardley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company./s/ Joseph P. Martori_____________________

Joseph P. Martori
Chief Executive Officer
May 14, 2004



/s/ Margaret M. Eardley___________________Margaret M. Eardley
Chief Financial Officer
May 14, 2004
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 23.2


                        E.E. Templeton & Associates, Inc.
                              407 1/2 Second Street
                              Marietta, Ohio 45750
                                 (614) 373-5046


November 1998


Resource Energy, Inc.
Attention:  Mr. Jeffrey C. Simmons
2876 S. Arlington Road
Akron, Ohio 44312

Gentlemen:

We hereby consent to the use of our audit reports dated October 15, 1996 and
October 23, 1997 on reserves and revenue as of September 30, 1996, and September
30, 1997, respectively, from certain properties owned by Resource Energy, Inc. a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Resource America, Inc., in Resource America, Inc.'s
Annual Report for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1998.

Very truly yours,


/s/E.E. Templeton
---------------------------------                 
E.E. Templeton & Associates, Inc.
# C_2022463EN.01005401.xml

| 5.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 463/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 463/54

---

Action brought on 19 September 2022 — ECE Group v EUIPO — ECE Piknik Ürünleri Plastik ve Kömür Üretim Ithalat Ihracat (ECE QUALITY OF LIFE)

(Case T-581/22)

(2022/C 463/80)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: ECE Group GmbH & Co. KG (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: M. Kloth, R. Briske, M. Tillwich and P. Funke, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: ECE Piknik Ürünleri Plastik ve Kömür Üretim Ithalat Ihracat Anonim Sirketi (Dilovasi/Kocaeli, Türkiye)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark ECE QUALITY OF LIFE — Application for registration No 18 163 717

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 July 2022 in Case R 1384/2021-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | amend the contested decision, so that the opposition is upheld in its entirety and the European Union trade mark application No 18 163 717 is refused in its entirety; |
| --- | --- |

—

amend the contested decision, so that the opposition is upheld in its entirety and the European Union trade mark application No 18 163 717 is refused in its entirety;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
# Ronal dNibloc k

675 3 W . How

e Rd. « DcWitl , M

I .t8820« . . , O T i ,';:M TC, r Datc:Fcl)ru;uy9,201 2 7- 7 i:-; ; 9 j : D 9 ; 0 0 Docke t Maiiagcinciil , Facility I\S . Dc])artnicn t

o l Transportatio n Docke t No . FAA-2012-008 9 1200 Ne w Jerse y Ave . S E Wes t Buildin g Gran dFloor, Roo mW-12014 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 Dear : Docke t

MrUiageineii t

Facility , Ia mwritin g to yo u o nbelial f o f Su nCountr y Airline s nonsto p Lansin g to Washingto nD C rout e t o as k yo u t o conside r extendin g tli e slo t

exemptio nreferenc e Docke t #FAA-2012-0089 . W e fly tlii s flight ofte nan di t

i s ver y convenien t

an d reasonabl e flight

fo r ou r family . Pleas e reconsider . Sincerely ,
# C_2022463EN.01001601.xml

| 5.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 463/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 463/16

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Centrale Raad van Beroep (Netherlands) lodged on 18 August 2022 — X v Raad van bestuur van de Sociale verzekeringsbank

(Case C-549/22)

(2022/C 463/21)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Centrale Raad van Beroep

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: X

Defendant: Raad van bestuur van de Sociale verzekeringsbank

Questions referred

| 1. | Must Article 68(4) of the Association Agreement (1) be interpreted as applying to a survivor of a deceased worker who resides in Algeria and who wishes to export her survivors’ benefit to Algeria?
  If so, |
| --- | --- |

1.

Must Article 68(4) of the Association Agreement (1) be interpreted as applying to a survivor of a deceased worker who resides in Algeria and who wishes to export her survivors’ benefit to Algeria?

If so,

| 2. | Must Article 68(4) of the Association Agreement, having regard to its wording and to its purpose and nature, be interpreted as having direct effect, so that persons to whom that provision applies are entitled to rely on it directly before the Member States’ courts to have rules of national law which are contrary to it disapplied?
  If so, |
| --- | --- |

2.

Must Article 68(4) of the Association Agreement, having regard to its wording and to its purpose and nature, be interpreted as having direct effect, so that persons to whom that provision applies are entitled to rely on it directly before the Member States’ courts to have rules of national law which are contrary to it disapplied?

If so,

| 3. | Must Article 68(4) of the Association Agreement be interpreted as precluding the application of the country-of-residence principle, as referred to in Article 17(3) of the Algemene nabestaandenwet (General Law on Survivors), which results in a restriction on the export of the survivors’ benefit to Algeria? |
| --- | --- |

3.

Must Article 68(4) of the Association Agreement be interpreted as precluding the application of the country-of-residence principle, as referred to in Article 17(3) of the Algemene nabestaandenwet (General Law on Survivors), which results in a restriction on the export of the survivors’ benefit to Algeria?

---

(1)  Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an Association between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the People’s Democratic Republic of Algeria, of the other part (OJ 2005 L 265, p. 2).

---