alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1


                                                                     EXHIBIT 11

Computation of Net Income Per Share 
Quaker State Corporation and Subsidiaries
For the Years Ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995 
(in thousands except per share data, unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                                    1997      1996      1995
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<S>                                                                <C>       <C>       <C>    
1    Net income                                                    $23,088   $13,723   $12,100
==============================================================================================

2    Average number of shares of capital
     stock outstanding - Basic                                      35,213    34,352    32,119

3    Shares issuable upon exercise of dilutive stock
     options outstanding during the period, based on
     average market prices                                              --       179        -- 

4    Average number of capital and capital equivalent
     shares outstanding - Diluted (2 + 3)                           35,213    34,531    32,119

5    Net income per capital and capital equivalent share - Basic
     (1 divided by 2)                                              $  0.66   $  0.40   $  0.38
==============================================================================================

6  Net income per capital share assuming full dilution - Diluted
   (1 divided by 4)                                                $  0.66   $  0.40   $  0.38
==============================================================================================

</TABLE>
No. 12-5059.

#### Eubanks *v.*Lempke, Superintendent, Five Points Correctional Facility.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 12-5185.

#### Graves *v.*Swarthout, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# C_2023189EN.01003301.xml

| 30.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 189/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 189/33

---

Order of the General Court of 31 March 2023 — Mocom Compounds v EUIPO — Centemia Conseils (Near-to-Prime)

(Case T-472/22) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark Near-to-Prime - Absolute ground for invalidity - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2023/C 189/44)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Mocom Compounds GmbH & Co. KG (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: J. Bornholdt, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Klee, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Centemia Conseils (Angevillers, France)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment and alteration of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 24 May 2022 (Case R 2178/2021-1).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law.

| 2. | Each party shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Each party shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 359, 19.9.2022.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                      29,562,831
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  239,013
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            29,801,844
<PP&E>                                       3,493,455
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              33,304,494
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,343,749
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      3,750
<COMMON>                                        13,760
<OTHER-SE>                                  29,350,705
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                33,304,494
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,755,409
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,996,843
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,241,434)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,241,434)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                   EXHIBIT 12
                       STATEMENTS RE COMPUTATION OF RATIOS
                    THE QUAKER OATS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Year Ended December 31                                          2000        1999
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Income Before Income Taxes                                    $551.1      $618.3
Add Fixed Charges - net of capitalized interest                 71.2        76.9
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Earnings                                                   $622.3      $695.2

Interest on Indebtedness                                      $ 59.2      $ 65.1
Portion of rents representative of the interest factor          17.2        15.0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Fixed Charges                                              $ 76.4      $ 80.1

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges (a)                          8.15        8.68
================================================================================
(a) For purposes of computing the ratio of earnings to fixed charges, earnings
represent pretax income from continuing operations plus fixed charges, net of
capitalized interest. Fixed charges represent interest, whether expensed or
capitalized, and one-third of rents (the portion deemed representative of the
interest factor).


                                       76
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 48 (Wednesday, March 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 11417]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6144]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION OF FINE ARTS


Notice of Meeting

    The Commission of Fine Arts' next meeting is scheduled for 20 March 
1997 at 10:00 AM in the Commission's offices in the Pension Building, 
Suite 312, Judiciary Square, 441 F Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20001 
to discuss various projects affecting the appearance of Washington, 
D.C., including buildings, memorials, parks, etc.; also matters of 
design referred by other agencies of the government.
    Inquiries regarding the agenda and requests to submit written or 
oral statements should be addressed to Charles H. Atherton, Secretary, 
Commission of Fine Arts, at the above address or call the above number.

    Dated in Washington, D.C. 5 March 1997.
Charles H. Atherton,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-6144 Filed 3-11-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6330-01-M
# EDA Read Me

# FY23_PPC_List

# Underlying_Data

# Variable Descriptions

# Technical Documentation
No. 12-39.

#### Selgas et ux. *v.*Henderson County Appraisal District.

Ct. App. Tex., 12th Dist. Certiorari denied.
# C_2022472EN.01005002.xml

| 12.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 472/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 472/50

---

Order of the General Court of 20 October 2022 — Cecoforma and Sopexa v REA

(Case T-493/22) (1)

(2022/C 472/60)

Language of the case: French

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 380, 3.10.2022.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED 3-31-00 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES THERETO CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S QUARTERLY
REPORT ON FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000818813
<NAME> BITSTREAM INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           9,203
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,754
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,171
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,173
<PP&E>                                           3,401
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,644
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14,116
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,881
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            78
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,108
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14,116
<SALES>                                          2,182
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,182
<CGS>                                              402
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      402
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (964)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        20
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (984)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (984)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.13)


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7118

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ROBERT JAMES TURNER, a/k/a Robert James

Branham,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District

Judge. (CR-96-374, CA-99-315-AM)

Submitted: November 18, 1999 Decided: November 24, 1999

Before WILKINS, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert James Turner, Appellant Pro Se. LeDora Knight, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on

June 2, 1999, the district court’s records show that it was entered

on the docket sheet on June 3, 1999. Pursuant to Rules 58 and

79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that

the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the

effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v.

Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).

2

PER CURIAM:

Robert James Turner seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. See United States v. Turner, Nos. CR-96-374;

CA-99-315-AM (E.D. Va. June 3, 1999).* We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
No. 09-10755.

#### Smith *v.*Florida,

564 U. S. 1052. Petition for rehearing denied.
Miriam Cello 

2666 Heather Dr. 

East Lansing, Ml 48823 

' 0 1^ / 

AF'!i€NTOF 

^ko OAII/ wciy -jr CA^ mft/7 0iSKc, S\r> si^r^ }Y)fy 

IS 

^DK.'TXJ'L . y 'ai . y
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8892 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to support rural residency 

training funding and promote partnerships with urban teaching hospitals. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 7, 2020 

Mr. WENSTRUP (for himself and Ms. SEWELL of Alabama) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, 

and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period 

to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 

concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to support 

rural residency training funding and promote partnerships with urban teaching hospitals. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rural-Urban Physician 

5 Workforce Act of 2020’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8892 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROMOTING RURAL HOSPITAL GME FUNDING OP2 PORTUNITY. 

3 Section 1886(h)(4)(H)(iv) of the Social Security Act 

4 (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(h)(4)(iv)) is amended— 

5 (1) by striking ‘‘(iv) NONRURAL HOSPITAL OP6 ERATING TRAINING PROGRAMS IN RURAL AREAS.— 

7 In the case of’’ and inserting the following: 

8 ‘‘(iv) TRAINING PROGRAMS IN RURAL

9 AREAS.— 

10 ‘‘(I) COST REPORTING PERIODS

11 BEGINNING BEFORE OCTOBER 1, 

12 2022.—For cost reporting periods be13 ginning before October 1, 2022, in the 

14 case of’’; and 

15 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub16 clause: 

17 ‘‘(II) COST REPORTING PERIODS

18 BEGINNING ON OR AFTER OCTOBER 1, 

19 2022.—For cost reporting periods be20 ginning on or after October 1, 2022, 

21 in the case of a hospital not located in 

22 a rural area but establishes approved 

23 medical residency training programs 

24 (or rural tracks) in a rural area, the 

25 Secretary shall, subject to paragraphs 

26 (7) and (8) and in a manner conVerDate Sep 11 2014 22:14 Dec 15, 2020 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H8892.IH H8892

pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 8892 IH

1 sistent with the principles of subpara2 graphs (F), (G), and (H)(i), promul3 gate rules for the application of such 

4 subparagraphs with respect to such a 

5 program and, in accordance with such 

6 rules, adjust in an appropriate man7 ner the limitation under subparagraph 

8 (F) for such hospital and each such 

9 hospital located in a rural area that 

10 participates in such a training.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 4.26




 


[Note: Translation from the original written
in Chinese]


 


Power of Attorney


 


I, Guangfu Cui, a citizen
of the People’s Republic of China (“China”), hold a 1.67% equity interest in Beijing Asiamedia Interactive
Advertising Co., Ltd. (the “Company”). I hereby irrevocably agree to authorize eLong, Inc., or any entity or
person designated by eLong, Inc. (including a party authorized by such entity or person),(the “Authorized Party”) to
hold and exercise the following rights related to this equity interest during the period of validity of this Power of Attorney:


 


Authorize the Authorized
Party to have full rights and authority to represent me, in my name as holder of 1.67% equity interest, according to laws and company
articles of incorporation, to exercise any and all shareholder rights, including but not limited to: the right to convene shareholders’
meetings, receive any notices or procedures regarding shareholders’ meetings, to attend shareholders’ meetings and
exercise full voting power as the holder of 1.67% equity interest (including, as my authorized representative, designating or appointing
the Company’s Directors, General Manager, Finance Controller and other senior management, determining dividends, and other
matters), to sell or transfer my 1.67% equity interest in the Company, etc.


 


The Authorized Party
has the right to designate its Directors (or Executive Director) to appoint a person to exercise the rights granted by this Power
of Attorney.


 


This Power of Attorney
shall become binding, effective and enforceable upon my signature. The Power of Attorney shall have a term of 20 years, which may
be automatically extended for successive additional 20 year terms without limit, as long as I remain a holder of any equity interest
in the Company.


 


[remainder of page intentionally left blank]


 


 


 


 


 


 


 




    	 



    	 



    

 





Exhibit 4.26







 


[Power of Attorney signature page]


 


 


Authorizing Party


Signature  /s/Guangfu
Cui      


Date:


 


 


Authorized Party


eLong, Inc.


Signature of authorized representative
  /s/ Sami Farhad       


Date: August 15, 2013
# C_2022148EN.01003801.xml

| 4.4.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.4.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/38

---

Action brought on 15 February 2022 — Bambu Sales v EUIPO (BAMBU)

(Case T-82/22)

(2022/C 148/50)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Bambu Sales, Inc. (Secaucus, New Jersey, United States) (represented by: T. Stein, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark BAMBU — Application for registration No 18 105 815

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 December 2021 in Case R 1702/2020-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision in its entirety; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision in its entirety;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs incurred by the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs incurred by the applicant.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
# C_2022128EN.01003101.xml

| 21.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 128/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 128/31

---

Action brought on 28 January 2022 — Chambre de commerce et d’industrie territoriale de la Marne en Champagne v EUIPO — Ambrosetti Group Ltd (TEHA)

(Case T-60/22)

(2022/C 128/43)

Language in which the application was lodged: French

Parties

Applicant: Chambre de commerce et d’industrie territoriale de la Marne en Champagne (Châlons-en-Champagne, France) (represented by: T. de Haan, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Ambrosetti Group Ltd (London, United Kingdom)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union of figurative mark TEHA — International registration designating the European Union No 1 404 100

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 November 2021 in Case R 839/2021-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs, including those incurred by the applicant’s legal predecessor for the purposes of the proceedings before the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs, including those incurred by the applicant’s legal predecessor for the purposes of the proceedings before the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO.

Plea in law

Infringement of Article 18(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
SERVED: JANUARY 7, 2013 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

In the Matter of: 

Aviation Technical Services, Inc. 

FAA Docket No. CP[TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS No. FAA-2011-0682 

ORDER SETTING OUT BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

The parties have agreed on the following Post Hearing Briefing Schedule, which is hereby 

established: 

1. The Post-Hearing Brief of Complainant Federal Aviation Administration shall be filed on or 

before February 15, 2013. 

2. The Post-Hearing Brief of Respondent Aviation Technical Services shall be filed on or 

before March 15, 2013. 

3. The Rebuttal Briefofthe Federal Aviation Administration, if any, shall be filed on or before 

April I, 2013. 

Attachment - Service List 

£~~ c _(l_n -- 'Richard C. Goodwin ~ , 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 
3 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-· Suite 2W1 0001 

ONE COPY 

Dane B. Jacques, Respondent's Counsel 

Dombroff Gilmore Jacques & French, PC 

1676 International Drive, PH 

McLean, VA 22102 

TEL: 703-336-8800 

FAX: 703-336-8750 

CELL: 703-966-6111 

Karen D. Huber, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel 

Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. 

Renton, W A 98057 

TEL: 425-227-2167 

FAX: 425-227-1007 

FDMS No. FAA-2011-0682 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department ofTransportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

1 

Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: 

Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S. W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 

2WIOOO, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
No. 11-10821.

#### Vasquez Arroyo *v.*Gross et al.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.