alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SERVED: JANUARY 5,2012 

•-' / .i / r 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION V '/^PpPT^-P^ 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS -• - /: f :'lprpjt/^-;/ 

WASHINGTON, DC i//OA/c 

IN THE MATTER OF 

MEDFORD AIR SERVICE, LLC 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

FDMS NO. FAA-2011-1289 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2011NM090054) has been assigned 

to Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other 

communications regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing 

Docket, and the other persons on the attached Service List. 

•-••- 1 

, AJ^^s-Mx 

r Ronnie A. )kfd^ 

. Chief Adminis^-^ive^aw Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
FDMS No. FAA-2011-1289 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Stuart W. Smith, Respondent's Counsel 

Miller & Associates 

5005 S.W. Meadows Rd., Suite 405 

Lake Oswego, OR 97035 

TEL: 503-598-1966 

FAX: 503-598-9593 

David F. Shayne, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel 

Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. 

Renton, WA 98057 

TEL: 425-227-2165 

FAX: 425-227-1007 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Legal Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

- 2 -
Submitted February 5, 2016,

affirmed May 24,

petition for review denied August 24, 2017 (361 Or 803)

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Plaintiff-Respondent, v.*JULIE GAIL MARTIN, *Defendant-Appellant.*

Washington County Circuit Court

C130336CR; A158425

395 P3d 65

Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Anna Melichar, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the Section A brief for appellant. Julie G. Martin filed the Section B brief *pro se.*

Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Paul L. Smith, Deputy Solicitor General, and Michael S. Shin, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Ortega, Presiding Judge, and Lagesen, Judge, and Garrett, Judge.

*749PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals after she was removed from drug court and sentenced to 36 months’ incarceration. We write only to note that, to the extent that her appeal challenges the sentence imposed by the court, the claim is not reviewable under ORS 138.222(2)(d). *See State v. Silsby,*282 Or App 104, 386 P3d 172 (2016), *rev den,*360 Or 752 (2017). We reject without discussion defendant’s remaining arguments.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Anthony B. Waters, Chief Financial Officer of InnSuites Hospitality Trust (the “Company”), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





1. The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended January 31, 2011 (the “Annual Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





2. The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: April 29, 2011
By:
/s/ Anthony B. WatersName: Anthony B. WatersTitle: Chief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2023296EN.01003101.xml

| 21.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 296/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 296/31

---

Judgment of the General Court of 5 July 2023 — Wajos v EUIPO (Shape of a container)

(Case T-10/22) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for a three-dimensional EU trade mark - Shape of a container - Absolute ground for refusal - Sign consisting exclusively of the shape of goods which is necessary to obtain a technical result - Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Decision taken following the annulment by the General Court of an earlier decision - Res judicata)

(2023/C 296/34)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Wajos GmbH (Dohr, Germany) (represented by: N. Böhmer, J. Schneiders and N. Gottschalk, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Nicolás Gómez and D. Hanf, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 21 October 2021 (Case R 2958/2019-2).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Wajos GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Wajos GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 84, 21.2.2022.

---
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Resource America, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Steven J. Kessler, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





                               /s/ Steven J. Kessler
                               ------------------------
                               Steven J. Kessler
                               Chief Financial Officer
                               December 29, 2003
No. 12-103.

#### Leskinen *v.*Halsey et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
**Exhibit 23.01**

 

**CONSENT OFINDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference inRegistration Statement No. 333-157171 on Form S-3; and RegistrationStatement No. 333-141416 on Form S-3/A; our report dated March 2,2009 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatoryparagraph relating to the adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board(FASB) Interpretation No. 48,  “Accountingfor Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an interpretation of FASB Statement No.109”),relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statementschedule of Public Service Company of Colorado and subsidiaries appearing inthis Annual Report on Form 10-K of Public Service Company of Colorado andsubsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2008.

 
| */s/*DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP |
|-------------------------------------|
| Minneapolis,  Minnesota             |
| March 2, 2009                  |

 

----
**Exhibit10.9**

 

PROMISSORY NOTE

 
| $130,582.75 |   | February 2, 2004 |
|-------------|--------|-----------------------|

 

FOR VALUEDRECEIVED, and legally bound hereby, INNSUITES HOSPITALITY TRUST (“Maker”), anOhio real estate investment trust, having an office at 1615 East NorthernAvenue, Suite 102, Phoenix, Arizona 85020 hereby promises to pay to Eric Wirth(“Note Holder”) or order and address as specified below the principal sum ofONE HUNDRED THIRTY THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED EIGHTY TWO AND 75/100 DOLLARS($130,582.75), with interest on the unpaid principal balance thereon from timeto time outstanding, at the rate of seven percent (7.00%) per annum, computedon a three hundred sixty (360)-day year, to be due and payable in installmentsof principal and interest as follows:

 

(A)                              $130,582.75amortized over 84 months at 7% interest ($1,970.84/month). This Note isnon-recourse secured by 58,259 RRF Limited Partnership Class B units. Monthlyinstallments of principal and interest to begin on March 2, 2004.

 

(B)                                Paymentsto be made payable to:

EricWirth or Rare Earth Financial LLC

InnSuitesHotel Centre Suite 102

1615E. Northern Avenue,

Phoenix,AZ 85020

 

The 58,259 RRF LimitedPartnership Class B units will remain as security for the unpaid balance on theNote. Payments made under this note shall be subject to any current bank ormortgage covenants.

 

At the option ofthe Note Holder, late charges upon written notice are assessed as follows:

10 days late, $50 penalty

35 days late, $150 penalty

Over 35 days late, Note Holder could declare the note in default andcall the entire amount due.

Should default be declared, units proportionate to unpaid balance willbe returned to Note Holder.

 

Principal andinterest payable in lawful money of the United States.

 

If legalproceedings are entered into to recover on this Note, the undersigned agree(s)to pay such sum as the Court may fix as attorney’s fees.

 

The Makers andendorsers hereof severally waive diligence, demand, presentment for payment andprotest, and consent to the extension or time of payment of this Note withoutnotice.

 

 

INNSUITESHOSPITALITY TRUST,

an Ohio real estateinvestment trust

 

 
|   | By:    | /s/ Marc Berg |                            |
|--------|--------|---------------|---------------------------------|
|   |   |          | Name: Marc E. Berg              |
|   |   |          | Title: Secretary and  Treasurer |
|        |        |               |                                 |  |

 

----
Regional Compliance Mix - RESFEC Case (No Efficiency Credits) 
          
      ofprinter-friendly version2006 EIA Energy Outlook and Modeling Conference
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF NORTHLAND CRANBERRIES, INC. AS OF AND FOR
THE PERIOD ENDED FEBRUARY 29, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-29-1996
<CASH>                                             200
<SECURITIES>                                     1,260
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,818
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      4,302
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,865
<PP&E>                                         125,322
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,649
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 142,291
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,602
<BONDS>                                         51,393
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            66
<OTHER-SE>                                      59,815
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   142,291
<SALES>                                         24,714
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                25,684
<CGS>                                           11,188
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,088
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,338
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,070
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,351
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,719
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,719
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.49
        

</TABLE>
# C_2023121EN.01000401.xml

| 3.4.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 121/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 121/4

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo (Spain) lodged on 1 December 2022 — DISA SUMINISTROS Y TRADING, S. L. U. (DISA) v Agencia Estatal de la Administración Tributaria

(Case C-743/22, DISA)

(2023/C 121/05)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Tribunal Supremo

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: DISA SUMINISTROS Y TRADING, S. L. U. (DISA)

Respondent: Agencia Estatal de la Administración Tributaria

Question referred

Must [Council] Directive 2003/96/EC of 27 October 2003 restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity, (1) in particular Article 5 thereof, be interpreted as precluding a national provision, such as Article 50ter of Ley 38/1992 de Impuestos Especiales (Law 38/1992 on excise duties) of 28 December 1992, which authorised the autonomous communities to set differentiated rates of the excise duties on mineral oils for each territory in respect of the same product?

---

(1)  
  OJ 2003 L 283, p. 51.

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6219

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

STEVEN AUBREY BURNETTE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District

Judge. (7:99-cr-00109-jct-mfu-1; 7:08-cv-80019-jct-mfu)

Submitted: May 1, 2008 Decided: June 9, 2008

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steven Aubrey Burnette, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Jack Bondurant,

Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
*Although Burnette characterized the motion as one under 28

U.S.C. § 1651 (2000), the district court properly construed the

motion as a § 2255 proceeding. See In re Vial, 115 F.3d 1192, 1194

(4th Cir. 1997) (en banc).

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Steven Aubrey Burnette seeks to appeal the district

court’s order denying as successive his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000)

motion.*

 The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that

any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court

is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Burnette has

not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Burnette’s

motion for certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We

also deny Burnette’s motions for appointment of counsel and for the

preparation of a transcript at the Government’s expense. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
- 3 -

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

November 9, 2018

N o. 04

- 18

- 00444

- CV

David VILLARREAL

, Appellant

v.

Jonabelle JOSIANE , et al.,

Appellee

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CI18748

Honorable M ichael E. Mery, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellee ’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief has this date been received

and filed in the above styled and numbered cause. Extension of time to file the Appellee’s brief

is this date GRANTED. Time is ext ended to January 4, 2019.



### PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

__ _____________ ____ _______________ KEITH E. HOTTLE,

C lerk of Court

cc: Tom Hall

Law Office of Thomas C. Hall, P.C.

115 East Travis Street

suite 700

San Antonio, TX 78205

Gregg R. Miller

Clark, Mil ler & Campbell

300 Convent

ste 2350

San Antonio, TX 78205 Thomas F. Nye

Gault, Nye & Quintana, L.L.P.

P.O. Box 6666

Corpus Christi, TX 78466
No. 12-5061.

#### Raisley *v.*New Jersey.

Super. Ct. N. J., App. Div. Certiorari denied.
Contacts, With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response

i\'atiuJl:l1 BII~i!ll'.Y;Air('raf! Association Eli Coni 5/26/2()il9 -

Regiunal Airlinl' A.,,,ntiation D;n'l' LuHHl'r 5126/2009

Aircraft Owners S. Pilol\ _\s~ori;Jtitlll Robrn H;Jckman .)/26i200l) -

--

\"1'.\ ('rai~ Fahian ~/26C(JOl) -

XL\ .\-l Lnpl.''- 512(jI2()Of)
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 6 (Thursday, January 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 1348]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-621]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Pub. L. 94-409, that the Securities and 
Exchange Commission will hold the following meetings during the week of 
January 13, 1997.
    An open meeting will be held on Monday, January 13, 1997, at 10:00 
a.m. A closed meeting will be held on Thursday, January 16, 1997, at 
2:30 p.m.
    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the 
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the closed meeting. 
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters may also be 
present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4), (8), (9)(A) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(4), 
(8), (9)(i) and (10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at 
the closed meeting.
    Commissioner Wallman, as duty officer, voted to consider the items 
listed for the closed meeting in a closed session.
    The subject matter of the open meeting scheduled for Monday, 
January 13, 1997, at 10:00 a.m., will be: Consideration of whether to 
issue a release proposing rules and soliciting comments to require the 
front of prospectuses to be drafted in plain English and amending 
current rules to provide standards on the meaning of clear, concise and 
understandable disclosure in prospectuses. For further information, 
contact Ann D. Wallace in the Division of Corporation Finance at (202) 
942-2980, or Kathleen Clarke in the Division of Investment Management 
at (202) 942-0724.
    The subject matter of the closed meeting scheduled for Thursday, 
January 16, 1997, at 2:30 p.m., will be:
    Injunction and settlement of injunctive actions.
    Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings of an 
enforcement nature.
    Opinion.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items. For further information and to 
ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, 
please contact: The Office of the Secretary at (202) 942-7070.

    Dated: January 7, 1997.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-621 Filed 1-7-97; 12:34 pm]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
Exhibit 23.04


              PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NORTH CAROLINA INCORPORATED
                                1426 Main Street
                         Columbia, South Carolina 29201



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUTANTS



As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in Registration Statement No. 333-68516 on Form S-3 of our report
dated November 4, 1999 (except with respect to the matters discussed in Note 13,
as to which the date is December 17, 1999), included in Public Service Company
of North Carolina, Incorporated's Form 10-K for the year ended September 30,
1999, and to all references to our Firm included in this registration statement.




s/Arthur Andersen LLP
Arthur Andersen LLP
Charlotte, North Carolina
March 18, 2002
412612016 l.Erge piece of SaskPo.Yer equipment makes its way fran Saskatoon to Estevan- SaskPo.Yer 

'l SaskPoiiVer 

Povvering the t=uture ao 

• Ask a Question 

News Releases wha~ are you looking for?j 

I Go I 

Large piece of SaskPower equipment makes its way from 

Saskatoon to Estevan 

September 14, 2015 

From Sept. 14 to 18, a large piece of SaskPower equipment will be moved by truck from Biggar to Boundary Dam Power 

Station near Estevan, using secondary highways as much as possible. 

The move will also require several power lines to be temporarily lifted. Where possible, power will be rerouted to avoid 

outages. Localized power outages may be necessary along the route. Notably, planned outages in the Estevan area on 

Sept. 17 will be necessary for the final leg of the journey. SaskPower apologizes for any inconvenience. 

The 90,000 kg cylinder is the size of a six-storey building: 20 metres-long, and nearly 12 metres in diameter, lying on its 

side. It is one of the major components in SaskPower's carbon capture and storage (CCS) process. It will improve the 

reliability of the storage for the amine solution being used to capture carbon dioxide molecules. This contributes to a 

growing CCS knowledge-base that SaskPower is developing and commercializing internationally so that CCS increasingly 

contributes to the fight against global climate change. 

To date, the CCS process has captured more than 400,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide, or the equivalent of taking more 

than 100,000 vehicles off Saskatchewan roads. SaskPower continues to fine-tune and test every part of the process, to be 

able to capture up to a million tonnes of C02 annually when fully operational. 

This world-first will help SaskPower provide reliable, affordable coal power to approximately 1oo,ooo Saskatchewan 

homes, but in a way that is 10 times cleaner than other coal units and even four times cleaner than a comparable natural 

gas unit. 

Travelling almost continuously, this high-load move will follow the path identified in the map below. 

htlp://www.saskpower.com/about-us/media-inform aliCilllrvNis-releasesll..-ge-piece-c:l-saskpcM'er-eqt..i pment-makes-its-way-fran-saskatocn-to-estewn/ 1/2 
Biggar 

Outlook Nokomis \ 

Rosetown 

Regina 

Stoughton Forget 

Estevan 

For more iDCormadou about plumed outages, visitwww "''k&lo'wersoomlm•taau- OCS is alao cme of'IIUIDYiDnovative 

career opportlmitiesllt SukPower. To leam mme, visit www yei!qJgwer.com[M....,....,