alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 12-5394.

#### Aldred *v.*Birkett, Warden.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# C_2023189EN.01003202.xml

| 30.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 189/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 189/32

---

Order of the General Court of 31 March 2023 — Eggers & Franke v EUIPO — E. & J. Gallo Winery (E & F)

(Case T-184/22) (1)

(European Union trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)

(2023/C 189/43)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Eggers & Franke Holding GmbH (Bremen, Germany) (represented by: A. Ebert-Weidenfeller and H. Förster, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Nicolás Gómez and T. Klee, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: E. & J. Gallo Winery (Modesto, California, United States) (represented by: V. von Bomhard and J. Fuhrmann, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 15 February 2022 (Case R 730/2021-5), relating to opposition proceedings between E. & J. Gallo Winery and Eggers & Franke Holding GmbH.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | Eggers & Franke Holding GmbH and E. & J. Gallo Winery shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Eggers & Franke Holding GmbH and E. & J. Gallo Winery shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

---

(1)  OJ C 207, 23.5.2022.

---
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO 

18 U.S.C. §1350, 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

        Inconnection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Arrhythmia Research Technology, Inc.(the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), theundersigned Chief Financial Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
ex_262088.htm


Exhibit 4.5


 


Amendment No. 2 to the 


BioLife Solutions, Inc. 


Second Amended and Restated 2013 Performance Incentive Plan


 


This Amendment No. 2 (the “Amendment”) to the BioLife Solutions, Inc. Second Amended and Restated 2013 Performance Incentive Plan (as amended, the “Plan”), is made effective as of June 18, 2021 by BioLife Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”).


 


WITNESSETH:


 


WHEREAS, the Plan was originally adopted by the Company’s Board of Directors on April 25, 2013 and approved by the Company’s stockholders on June 20, 2013, was amended and restated by the Company’s Board of Directors on February 19, 2015 and approved by the Company’s stockholders on May 4, 2015, was again amended and restated by the Company’s Board of Directors on April 5, 2017 and approved by the Company’s stockholders on May 25, 2017 and was amended by the Company’s Board of Directors on February 24, 2020 and approved by the Company’s stockholders on July 9, 2020;


 


WHEREAS, the Board has the authority pursuant to Article 9 of the Plan to amend the Plan subject to the approval of the stockholders entitled to vote in accordance with applicable law;


 


WHEREAS, the Board desires to amend the Plan to further increase the aggregate number of shares of common stock that may be issued under the Plan; and


 


WHEREAS, on April 22, 2021, the Board approved Amendment No. 2 and recommended its approval to the stockholders;


 


NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the power of amendment set forth in the Plan and subject to the approval of Company’s stockholders, the Plan is hereby amended as follows effective upon the approval by the stockholders of Amendment No. 2:


 


1. The references to “5,000,000 shares” in the first paragraph of Article 4.1 of the Plan is replaced in their entirety with “6,500,000 shares”.


 


2. Except as hereinabove amended and modified, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.


 


3. A majority of votes cast by the Stockholders present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote at the meeting of stockholders at which this Amendment No. 2 to the Plan was considered, has duly approved this Amendment No. 2 to the Plan.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment No. 2 to the Plan is made effective this 18th day of June, 2021.


 


	 	
			BioLife Solutions, Inc.


			 


			By:  /s/ Roderick de Greef         


			Name: Roderick de Greef


			Title: Chief Financial Officer
Sandra Garza Davis f/k/a

Sandra C. Saks and Landen

SaksAppellant/s

Lauren Saks /s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 16, 2014

No. 04-13-00518-CV

Sandra Garza DAVIS f/k/a Sandra C. Saks and Landen Saks,

Appellants

v.

Lauren Saks MERRIMAN,

Appellee

From the Probate Court No 1, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011-PC-3466

Honorable Polly Jackson Spencer, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The Appellant’s Motion to Substitute Counsel is hereby GRANTED.

___________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 16th day of January, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court

FILE COPY
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 08752

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2File Name Description

08752\08752_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

08752\08752_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 08752\08752_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08752\08752_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08752\08752_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08752\08752_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08752\08752_Part E.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08752\08752_Part F.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08752\08752_Part G.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08752\08752_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08752\8752_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

08752\Certification Statement Plant ID 08752.pdf Plant certification statement

x 08752\Supplemental Documents\08752 CBI Part G LANDF_1 Leachate Analysis 8-12-10.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 08752\Supplemental Documents\08752 CBI Part G LANDF_1 Leachate Analysis 8-19-10(2).pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 08752\Supplemental Documents\08752_CBI Part G LANDF_1 Leachate Analysis 7-29-10(2).pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 08752\Supplemental Documents\08752_CBI Part G LANDF_1 Leachate Analysis 8.5.2010.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

08752\Supplemental Documents\08752_Part A_Map 1_Portland.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

08752\Supplemental Documents\08752_Part A_Map 2_Portland.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 08752\Supplemental Documents\08752_Part A_Map 3_Portland.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 08752\Supplemental Documents\08752_Part A_Map 4_Bangor_Portland.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 08752\Supplemental Documents\08752_Part A_WB-1_Portland.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 08752\Supplemental Documents\08752_Part A_WB-2_Bangor_Portland.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 08752\Supplemental Documents\08752_Part D_WWT-1_Portland.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 08752\Supplemental Documents\08752_Part F_ F5.6 DIAGRAM_Portland.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 08752\Supplemental Documents\08752_Part F_F5-6 Diagram Bangor_Portland.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 08752\Supplemental Documents\08752_Part G_Aerial Map Bangor_Portland.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

08752\Supplemental Documents\CBI Substantiation\GenOn Energy_EIP FOIA.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000818257
<NAME> JOHN HANCOCK REALTY INCOME FUND-II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       2,771,303
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   67,921
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,839,224
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,852,120
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          258,548
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  18,593,572
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,852,120
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               520,619
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   66,583
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               124,250
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                329,786
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            329,786
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   329,786
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.13


</TABLE>
No. 12-91.

#### Veta *v.*Ryan, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted), Jill M. Church, the Chief Financial Officer of Vical Incorporated (the Company), hereby certifies that, to the best of her knowledge:



|1. | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the Periodic
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Periodic
Report and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Periodic Report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                      
|--------------------------------------
|Dated: November 7, 2008               
|                                      
|/s/ JILL M. CHURCH                    
|Jill M. Church Chief Financial
Officer

THIS CERTIFICATION ACCOMPANIES THE FORM 10-Q TO WHICH IT RELATES, IS NOT DEEMED FILED WITH THE SEC AND
IS NOT TO BE INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO ANY FILING OF THE COMPANY UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, OR THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED (WHETHER MADE BEFORE OR AFTER THE DATE OF THE FORM 10-Q), IRRESPECTIVE OF ANY
GENERAL INCORPORATION LANGUAGE CONTAINED IN SUCH FILING. A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS CERTIFICATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE COMPANY AND WILL BE RETAINED BY THE COMPANY AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON
REQUEST.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<MULTIPLIER>   1
       
<S>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                      NOV-30-1997
<CASH>                                 454768
<SECURITIES>                          7072880
<RECEIVABLES>                          590662
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                            161794
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      8460613
<PP&E>                                 912524
<DEPRECIATION>                              540628
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             9678606
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  527435
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                31439
<OTHER-SE>                            8811587
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          9678606
<SALES>                               1638168
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      1638168
<CGS>                                  450596
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          980812
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        298988
<INCOME-TAX>                            91000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         207988
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                           207988
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                             .07
        

</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANDREW M. HUNTER ; ANGELA A.

HUNTER,

Petitioners

- Appellants,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL

REVENUE,

Respondent

- Appellee. No. 16

- 70308

Tax Ct. No. 20732

- 15

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from a Decision of the

United States Tax Court

Submitted March 8, 2017 **

Before: LEAVY, W. FLETCHER , and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Andrew M. Hunter and Angela A. Hunter appeal from the Tax Court’s order

dismissing for lack of jurisdiction their action related to their tax liability for tax

years 2012 and 2013 . We have jurisdiction under 26 U.S.C. § 7482(a). We review

de novo, Gorospe v. Comm ’ r , 451 F.3d 966, 968 (9th Cir. 2006) , and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

MAR 21 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 16

- 70308

The Tax C ourt properly concluded that it lacked jurisdiction over the

petition because the petition was not filed within 90 days of the notice of

deficiency. See 26 U.S.C

. § 6213(a) (establishing a 90

- day requirement for

appealing a notice of deficiency); 26 U.S.C. § 7502 (a) (2) (timely mailing tr eated as

timely filing “only if

. . . deposited in the mail in t he United States in an envelope

. . . prope rly addressed to the agency

. . . ”); Gorospe , 451 F.3d at 968 (the Tax

C ourt is a court of limited jurisdiction, and its subject matter is d etermined by

Title 26 of the United States Code).

AFFIRMED.
#### WILGRO SERVICES, INC., Petitioner v. WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (MENTUSKY), Respondents

No. 354 EAL 2017

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

January 9, 2018

*736ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 9th day of January, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 13, 2022

No. 04-22-00233-CV & 04-22-00253-CV

3CM, LLC D/B/A 3CM MULTIFAMILY,

Appellant

v.

Gregor TRIMBLE and Group of Investors,

Appellees

From the 198th Judicial District Court, Bandera County, Texas

Trial Court No. CVCD-22-0000052

Honorable M. Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s Emergency Motion for Reconsideration of Emergency Motion to Stay 

Temporary Injunction is denied without prejudice. 

_________________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 13th day of June, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 54 (Thursday, March 20, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13402-13403]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6967]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF NAVAJO AND HOPI INDIAN RELOCATION


New Lands Grazing Permits; Close of Application

AGENCY: Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 13403]]

SUMMARY: This notice establishes the date when the application period 
for New Lands Grazing Permits will close. This action is necessary to 
comply with 25 CFR 700.709.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Tessler (Legal Counsel), Office 
of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation, at (520) 779-2727.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 9, 1992, the Office of Navajo and 
Hopi Indian Relocation (ONHIR) published in the Federal Register (Vol. 
57, No. 111, at p. 24363) a final rule regarding New Lands Grazing 
privileges. The rule, 25 CFR 700.709(d) provided that the ONHIR will 
determine when the application period for New Lands Grazing Permits 
will close and that a notice of that date would be published.
    The ONHIR has determined that pursuant to 25 CFR 700.709, persons 
on the list of permittees eligible to receive grazing permits must file 
an application for a New Lands Grazing Permit by June 2, 1997, or they 
will lose their priority status for receiving permits.
    The ONHIR also intends to notify each of the approximately 65 
persons eligible to receive a New Lands Grazing Permit by writing to 
them personally.

    Dated: March 11, 1997.
Christopher J. Bavasi,
Executive Director, Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation.
[FR Doc. 97-6967 Filed 3-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7560-01-M
Hennion & Walsh, Inc. 487


Exhibit 4.3


 


 


Consent of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm


We have issued our report
dated July 8, 2021, with respect to the financial statement of SmartTrust 523 contained in Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement
on Form S-6 (File No. 333-255287) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in the Registration Statement
and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm”.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


July 8, 2021
# C_2023329EN.01000501.xml

| 18.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 329/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 329/5

---

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 June 2023 — Leon Leonard Johan Veen v European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol)

(Case C-444/22 P) (1)

(Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Non-contractual liability - Law enforcement cooperation - Criminal intelligence - Alleged unauthorised disclosure of data - Regulation (EU) 2016/794 - Article 50(1) - Non-material damage - Action for damages - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)

(2023/C 329/06)

Language of the case: Slovak

Parties

Appellant: Leon Leonard Johan Veen (represented by: M. Mandzák, advokát)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) (represented by: A. Nunzi, acting as Agent, and by M. Kottmann and G. Ziegenhorn, Rechtsanwälte)

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed as being in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed as being in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.

| 2. | Mr Leon Leonard Johan Veen shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Leon Leonard Johan Veen shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol).

---

(1)  
  OJ C 340, 5.9.2022.

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7406

ANTHONY MASON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JERRY DETRICK, Eastern Regional Jail Administrator,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern

District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. W. Craig Broadwater,

District Judge. (CA-97-64-3)

Submitted: February 16, 1999 Decided: March 15, 1999

Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Mason, Appellant Pro Se. Chad Mario Cardinal, Assistant

Attorney General, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not bindig precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Mason appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

the district court. See Mason v. Detrick, No. CA-97-64-3 (N.D.W.

Va. Aug. 28, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED