alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 27.1

THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED 3-31-98 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES THERETO CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S QUARTERLY
REPORT ON FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000818813
<NAME> BITSTREAM INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       5,334,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,284,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (401,000)
<INVENTORY>                                     39,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,811,000
<PP&E>                                       4,327,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,935,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,759,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,849,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        67,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,790,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,759,000
<SALES>                                      2,841,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,841,000
<CGS>                                          175,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  175,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,844,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,072,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    24,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,096,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,096,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.17)
        

</TABLE>
No. 12-90.

#### Polar Star Alaska Housing Corp. *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT (32.1)CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Albany International Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Joseph G. Morone, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Michael K. Burke, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                           
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 5, 2009

| |    |                                                  
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------
| | By | /s/ Joseph G. Morone                             
| |    |                                                  
| |    | Joseph G. Morone                                 
| |    | President and Chief Executive Officer            
| |    | (Principal Executive Officer)                    
| |    |                                                  
| |    |                                                  
| | By | /s/ Michael K. Burke                             
| |    |                                                  
| |    | Michael K. Burke                                 
| |    | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
| |    | (Principal Financial Officer)                    

66

---
Exhibit 24



POWER OF ATTORNEY



FORM 10-K



KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that we, the undersigned Directors of Roanoke Electric Steel Corporation, a Virginia corporation, hereby constitute
and appoint T. Joe Crawford, Mark G. Meikle, and William M. Watson, Jr., or any of them, with full power to each of them to act alone, my true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, for me on my behalf and in my name, place and stead, to execute
and file the Annual Report on Form 10-K for Roanoke Electric Steel Corporation. for its fiscal year ended October 31, 2004, and any amendment which such attorney- or attorneys-in-fact may deem appropriate or necessary.



Dated: December 21, 2004



|                             |  |                        
|---------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|/s/ George B. Cartledge, Jr. |  | /s/ Thomas L. Robertson
|                             | 
|/s/ T. Joe Crawford          |  | /s/ Donald G. Smith    
|                             | 
|/s/ Timothy R. Duke          |  | /s/ Charles W. Steger  
|                             | 
|/s/ George W. Logan          |  | /s/ Joseph H. Vipperman
|                             | 
|/s/ Charles I. Lunsford, II  |  |
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Ex parte Adrian Barnes

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 9

- 00 6 44

- CR

Trial court case number: 1 494270A

Trial court: 209th District Court of Harris County

We abated this appeal and remanded the case to the trial court for appellant to obtain

a signed order on his applicat ion for a writ of habeas corpus and for the trial court to enter

findings of fact and conclusions of law. The trial court clerk has filed a supplemental

clerk’s record containing the trial court’s order denying appellant’s application for a writ

of habea s corpus and the trial court’s findings of fact and concl usions of law

. Accordingly,

we reinstate the case on the Court’s active docket.

Appellant’s brief will be due within 30 days of the date of this order

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 31.1(a), 38.6(a). Appellee’s brief will be due within 20 days of the date the

appellant’s brief is filed. See id.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

____

/s/ Julie Countiss

___  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: _ S eptembe r 12, 2019

____
##### 



Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with this Annual Report of Raven Industries, Inc. (the company) on Form 10-K for
the year ending January 31, 2005, the undersigned, Ronald M. Moquist and Thomas Iacarella, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that: (1) this report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in this report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
company. Date: March 31, 2005/s/ Ronald M. MoquistRonald M. MoquistPresident and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Thomas IacarellaThomas IacarellaVice President and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          27,015
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   77,679
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,452
<INVENTORY>                                      7,394
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               134,720
<PP&E>                                       1,709,344
<DEPRECIATION>                                 565,114
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,296,533
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           65,561
<BONDS>                                        749,876
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        58,799
<OTHER-SE>                                     233,245
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,296,533
<SALES>                                        610,157
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               610,157
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  427,725
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              51,586
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 85,103
<INCOME-TAX>                                    33,080
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             52,023
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    52,023
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .86
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .85
        

</TABLE>
Interagency comments on RIN 2060-AP52 -- RIA Chapter 11

Higgins, Cortney

to: RobertJ Wayland

03/15/2011 12:46 PM

Cc: Bill Maxwell, Larry Sorrels, Karen Thundiyil

1 Attachment

CHAPTER 11benefit-costcomparisonToxicsRuleRIA_3-

14OMBclean_InteragencycommentsunderEO12866.docx

Hi Bob,

Attached are interagency comments on the RIA Chapter 11. Please let me know if you have questions.

Regards,

Cortney

________________________________________________ Cortney Higgins, PhD

Policy Analyst

OMB/OIRA/NRE

202.395.7856

chiggins@omb.eop.gov
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 45 (Friday, March 7, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 10425]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5714]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 96-ANE-46]


Amendment to Class E Airspace; Springfield/Chicopee, MA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action modifies the Class E airspace at Springfield/
Chicopee, MA by removing the Class E airspace extending upward from the 
surface, effective during the times when the Airport Traffic Control 
Tower (ATCT) is not operating. This action results from the elimination 
of continuous weather reporting at Westover ARB/Metropolitan Airport 
(KCEF).

EFFECTIVE DATE: This rule was effective 0901 UTC, January 30, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sandra V. Bogosian, Operations Branch, 
ANE-530.4, Federal Aviation Administration, 12 New England Executive 
Park, Burlington, MA 01803-5299; telephone (617) 238-7534; fax (617) 
238-7596.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA published this direct final with a 
request for comments in the Federal Register on December 19, 1996 (61 
FR 66911). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a 
non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no 
adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that 
no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse 
comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse 
comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would 
become effective on January 30. No adverse comments were received, and 
thus this notice confirms that this final rule became effective on that 
date.

    Issued in Burlington, MA, on February 28, 1997.
David J. Hurley,
Manager, Air Traffic Division, New England Region.
[FR Doc. 97-5714 Filed 3-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
# hr2454hioff.0729a

Total Energy Supply and Disposition Summary

Energy Consumption by Sector and Source

Energy Prices by Sector and Source

Residential Sector Key Indicators and Consumption

Commercial Sector Key Indicators and Consumption

Industrial Sector Key Indicators and Consumption

Transportation Sector Key Indicators and Delivered Energy Consumption

Electricity Supply, Disposition, Prices, and Emissions

Electricity Generating Capacity

Electricity Trade

Liquid Fuels Supply and Disposition

Petroleum Product Prices

Natural Gas Supply, Disposition, and Prices

Oil and Gas Supply

Coal Supply, Disposition, and Prices

Renewable Energy Generating Capacity and Generation

Carbon Dioxide Emissions by Sector and Source

Macroeconomic Indicators

Energy-Related Carbon Dioxide Emissions by End Use

Renewable Energy Consumption by Sector and Source 1/

Greenhouse Gas Compliance Results
From: Thomas Finseth

To: Wang, Daisy

Date: 12/12/2012 8:02 AM

Subject: Fwd: Re: Wabash Valley Power: Non-CBI Information Submittal

The response from WVPA regarding that CBI sentence.

>>> Terry Hogan <t_hogan@wvpa.com> 12/11/2012 5:55 PM >>>

Yes. That is correct. 

Terry Hogan 

317-481-2839

On Dec 11, 2012, at 4:53 PM, "Thomas Finseth" <Thomas.Finseth@erg.com> wrote:

Hi Terry,

While reviewing the comments on the notes, we identified what appears to be an internal question regarding CBI. See Page 

2, immediately after the first bullet. Within the paragraph describing the slag storage, the notes include the following sentence, 

"WVPA should review if they feel the site to which the slag is transferred is CBI."

Please confirm that this sentence can be removed from the notes. Additionally, please confirm that the remainder of the 

paragraph can remain as written and that it does not include any CBI concerns.

Thanks,

TJ

>>> Terry Hogan <t_hogan@wvpa.com> 12/6/2012 9:32 AM >>>

Alicea & Thomas,

Attached are WVPA’s edited notes on the 2009 Site Visit along with the non-CBI portion of the Power Point Presentation (7 

slides) conducted by the Plant Manager at the time of the site visit. I believe this constitutes a timely submittal based on your 

earlier email.

If you have questions, please contact me at 317-481-2839 or t_hogan@wvpa.com. 

Terry Hogan

Manager, Environmental Affairs

Wabash Valley Power

The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.

It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else

is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, 

distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is 

prohibited and may be unlawful. If you believe that you have received this

email in error, please contact the sender. E-mail transmission cannot be

guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted,

corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.

The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions 

in the contents of this message, or for any damage caused by any virus 

which arises as a result of e-mail transmission.
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 99.3


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Resource America, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K/A for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Edward E. Cohen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

   (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
         15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
         of the Company.

/s/ Edward E. Cohen

Edward E. Cohen
Chief Executive Officer
May 15, 2003














A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Resource America, Inc. and will be retained by Resource America,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                                                                     Exhibit No. 11
                      HARDING LAWSON ASSOCIATES GROUP, INC.

                        Computation of Per Share Earnings
                      (In thousands, except per share data)
                                   (Unaudited)


                                                             Three Months Ended                Nine Months Ended
                                                                February 28,                     February 28,
                                                          1998            1997             1998           1997
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<S>                                                      <C>             <C>              <C>            <C>  
     Average basic shares outstanding                    4,986           4,942            5,016          4,938
     Net effect of dilutive stock options
         based on the treasury stock
         method.                                           156              32               81             25
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Average diluted shares outstanding                  5,142           4,974            5,097          4,963
==============================================================================================================

     Net income                                         $  254         $   462           $2,065         $1,438
==============================================================================================================

     Basic and diluted earnings per
         common share                                   $  .05         $   .09           $  .41         $  .29
==============================================================================================================
</TABLE>
Section II B Industrial Sites Controlled by Others

1. Polyolefin Processors: Product will be blended with other materials such as 

polyethylene or polypropylene in an extruder. Workers will typically transfer the 

NCS to a feeder at point A and then either directly into an extruder to mix with a 

polyolefin such as polyethylene or to a blender to mix with other substances 

before extrusion. The modified polyolefin will be packaged at point B.

Worker exposure: would be during transfer at point A, a small amount of dust

could escape. Transfer would take ~ 1 hr per batch. Exposure would be 1 

hr/day for 1 worker.

An air filter would typically be used to control dust at point C. Worker 

exposure could occur when this filter is changed. Exposure would probably be 

less than four hours per day for 1-2 workers per site and occur less than 50 times 

per year. 

 

Environmental Release: 1: Drums will contain a small amount of product once 

empty (estimated to be less than 6 kg per container) which will need to be 

disposed of properly.

An air filter would typically be used to control dust at 2. Release to a solid waste 

processing facility would occur when this filter is changed. Less than 0.5 kg/batch 

is expected to be released to the filter. 

N

Fe Mixer/

Ext Packaging 

A

B

1 C
No. 11-10875.

#### Carpenter *v.*Bradt, Superintendent, Attica Correctional Facility.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Balbir SINGH, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 16-73683

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted December 18, 2017 *

Filed December 21, 2017

*935Balbir Singh, Pro Se

OIL, Anthony Cardozo Payne, Senior Litigation Counsel, DOJ; — U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Alexander Jacob Lutz, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent

Before: WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

**The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P, 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Balbir Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions pro se for review of an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) determination under 8 C.F.R. § 1208.31(a) that he did not have a reasonable fear of persecution or torture and thus is not entitled to relief from his administrative removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the IJ’s factual findings. *Andrade-Garcia*v. *Lynch,*828 F.3d 829, 833 (9th Cir. 2016). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s conclusion that Singh failed to demonstrate a reasonable possibility of persecution on account of a protected ground. *See Ayala v. Holder,*640 F.3d 1095, 1097-98 (9th Cir. 2011) (mistreatment motivated purely by personal retribution does not bear a nexus to a protected ground); *Gonzalez-Medina v. Holder,*641 F.3d 333, 338 (9th Cir. 2011) (testimony of petitioner’s belief that relocation would not be safe or reasonable was, by itself, insufficient to meet petitioner’s burden of proof).

Substantial evidence also supports the IJ’s conclusion that Singh failed to demonstrate a reasonable possibility of torture by or with the consent or acquiescence of the government. *See Andrade-Garcia,*828 F.3d at 836-37.

We reject, as unsupported by the record, Singh’s contentions that the IJ violated his due process rights. *See Lata v. INS,*204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir. 2000) (requiring error to prevail on a due process claim),

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED,

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 33-38614 and 333-41352) of Raven
Industries, Inc. of our report dated March 7, 2003 relating to the consolidated
financial statements of Raven Industries, Inc. as of January 31, 2003, 2002 and
2001 and for the years then ended, which appears in the 2003 Annual Report to
Stockholders, which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also
consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated March 7, 2003
relating to the financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
April 23, 2003