# C_2022284EN.01004901.xml

| 25.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 284/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 284/49

---

Action brought on 27 May 2022 — QC and Others v EUIPO — Przedsiębiorstwo Drobiarskie Grzegorz Wyrębski (BLUE BRAND CHICKEN)

(Case T-316/22)

(2022/C 284/67)

Language in which the application was lodged: Polish

Parties

Applicants: QC, QD and QE (represented by: A. Suskiewicz, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Przedsiębiorstwo Drobiarskie Grzegorz Wyrębski (Wróblew, Poland)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietors of the trade mark at issue: Applicants

Trade mark at issue: Three-dimensional EU trade mark ‘BLUE BRAND CHICKEN’ — EU trade mark No 13 071 378

Proceedings before EUIPO: Invalidity proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 March 2022 in Case R 1166/2020-2

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings in the form of expenses necessarily incurred by the applicants for the purpose of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings in the form of expenses necessarily incurred by the applicants for the purpose of the proceedings.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Plea alleging that the findings of EUIPO are inconsistent with the Polish legal order; |
| --- | --- |

—

Plea alleging that the findings of EUIPO are inconsistent with the Polish legal order;

| — | Plea regarding the classification of [Przedsiębiorstwo Drobiarskie Grzegorz Wyrębski] as a ‘third party’ for the purposes of Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Plea regarding the classification of [Przedsiębiorstwo Drobiarskie Grzegorz Wyrębski] as a ‘third party’ for the purposes of Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Breach of the principle of the uniformity of case-law and infringement of Article 63(3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Breach of the principle of the uniformity of case-law and infringement of Article 63(3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Plea alleging that an incorrect date was used when determining the date of filing of the EU trade mark at issue, that is to say, plea alleging infringement of Articles 36 and 37 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Plea alleging that an incorrect date was used when determining the date of filing of the EU trade mark at issue, that is to say, plea alleging infringement of Articles 36 and 37 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Plea alleging that the decision was issued to a person incorrectly designated as a party to the proceedings in view of the removal of Przedsiębiorstwo Drobiarskie Grzegorz Wyrębski from the register of economic activity on 2 January 2020. |
| --- | --- |

—

Plea alleging that the decision was issued to a person incorrectly designated as a party to the proceedings in view of the removal of Przedsiębiorstwo Drobiarskie Grzegorz Wyrębski from the register of economic activity on 2 January 2020.

---