alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT32**

 

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the followingcertifications are being made to accompany the Registrant’s quarterly report onForm 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended January 31, 2004:**

 

**Certificationof Chief Executive Officer(1)**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of The Neiman Marcus Group,Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

(i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Companyfor the fiscal quarter ended January 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 
| Dated: March 8, 2004 |   |   | /s/    Burton  M. Tansky |
|----------------------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------|
|                 |   |   | Burton M. Tansky                             |
|                 |   |   | President and  Chief Executive Officer       |
|                      |        |        |                                              |  |

 

**Certificationof Chief Financial Officer(1)**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of The Neiman Marcus Group,Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

(i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Companyfor the fiscal quarter ended January 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 
| Dated: March 8, 2004 |   |   | /s/    James  E. Skinner       |
|----------------------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|                 |   |   | James E. Skinner                                   |
|                 |   |   | Senior Vice President  and Chief Financial Officer |
|                      |        |        |                                                    |  |

 

----

(1) A signed original for this written statement required by Section906 has been provided to The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. and will be retained byThe Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
No. 12-5083.

#### Woodard *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# Certificate of Compliance

– VOC Emissions

MDC

‐ 200, Foamed

‐ In

‐ Place Insulation



## Icynene Inc

Icynene Inc selected a sample representative of its MDC

‐ 200 product manufactured in

Mississauga, Ontario, Canada and submitted it for testing on September 24, 2010. Berkeley

Analytical measured and evaluated the emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from this

sample according to California Department of Health Services (CDHS) Standard Practice for the

Testing of Vol atile Organic Emissions from Various Sources Using Small

‐ Scale Environmental

Chambers (CA/DHS/EHLB/R

‐ 174, 2004, including 2004 Addenda; also known as

, chamber testing

portion of CA Section 01350) and ASTM Standard Guide D 5116

‐ 06. Chemical sampling and

analysis were performed following U.S. EPA Compendium Methods TO

‐ 1 and TO

‐ 17 and ASTM

Standard Method D 5197

‐ 09.

Calculations were perfor med with the following classroom exposure parameters to project the

concentrations of VOCs of concern resulting from the use of the product. These parameters are

taken from California Department of Public Health CDPH/EHLB/Standard Method V1.1, 2010. The

results of the test and the calcula ted concentrations for the classroom are presented in Berkeley

Analytical laboratory report, 354

‐ 007

‐ 01A

‐ Oct1210.

Exposure Scenarios

Standardized

Environment Room Volume

(m 3 ) Area Specific Air Flow

Rate (m/h) Ceiling Plus Wall

Insulation Area (m 2 )

Classroom 231 1.04 183.8

Summary of test results according to the CA DHS Standard Practice guidelines:

 Predicted concentrations of all VOCs of concern including formaldehyde were below the

guideline concentrations.



### Based on these results, the tested product sample meets the VOC emission

requirements for use in classroom environment as defined in the CA DHS Standard

Practice

. Thus, the testing requirements are met to qualify the product as a low

‐

emitting material in the Collaborative for High Performance Schools rating system

(CHPS Designed & CHPS Verified).

Certificate No.: 101012

‐ 02

Dated: October 12, 2010

____ _____________ _____________________ Raja S. Tannous Kelly Campbell

Laboratory Director Quality Manager

FC16.1
4,316

0

4,107

8,423

BallotsCounted

0

BallotsRejected

MISSOURI

Mail,Fax,Email

Election/Registrar's

Office

Internet

DM

V

Public

Assistance

Office

DisabilitiesAgency

Military

RecruitmentOffice

OtherState

Agency

RegistrationDrives

Registration:Other

237,573

288,438

89,037

25,661

67,436

541 170 75 0 39

RegistrationFormSource

TotalRegisteredVoters

4,215,860

SectionA-VoterRegistration

RegistrationFormsReceived

2,133,688

ConfirmationNotificationsSent

483,037

Polling

Place

UOCAVA Absentee Provisional

Ballot

EarlyVote

Center

Voteby

Mail

Turnout:

Other

2,680,357

279,188

8,799 5,511 0 0 0

SectionF-TurnoutbyMethod

CountedFull Counted

Part

Rejected Provisional:

Other

1,701

3,803

0 0

SectionE-ProvisionalBallots

UniformedService

Non-militaryOverseas

Other

SectionB-UOCAVA

5,892

5,435

0

11,327

BallotsTransmitted

TOTAL TOTAL

ProvisionalBallotTotal:5,511 TurnoutTotal:2,973,855

Note:Somefieldsmaybeblankorzeroduetodatanotbeingreportedor

jurisdictionsnotcollectingthatdata.

Select: MISSOURI

TOTAL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                          

  

2016EAVSDataBrief 

U i
<PAGE>

Exhibit 12


                              COMPUTATION OF RATIOS
                                 (in thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                                                    Fiscal Year Ending
                                                                              -------------------------------
                                                                                2001       2000       1999
                                                                                ----       ----       ----
<S>                                                                             <C>         <C>      <C>
Income from continuing operations before income taxes                           $18,737     $5,700   $35,291
Minority Interest and Equity in loss of unconsolidated affiliate                  5,592      3,190        49
Fixed Charges                                                                    14,736     18,632    20,226
Total Earnings                                                                  $39,065    $27,522   $55,566
Earnings to Fixed Charges (1)                                                    2.65:1     1.48:1    2.75:1
</TABLE>


(1)    Calculated by dividing the sum of income from continuing operations,
       Minority Interest, Equity in loss of unconsolidated affiliate and fixed
       charges by fixed charges. Fixed charges represent total interest expense
       including amortization of debt expense.
**Exhibit 10.10**

 

**PROMISSORYNOTE**

 
| $78,000 |   | July 26, 2002 |
|---------|--------|--------------------|

 

FOR VALUEDRECEIVED, and legally bound hereby, INNSUITES HOSPITALITY TRUST (“Maker”), anOhio real estate investment trust, having an office at 1615 East NorthernAvenue, Suite 102, Phoenix, Arizona 85020 hereby promises to pay to TheAnderson Charitable Remainder Unitrust (“Note Holder”) or order and address asspecified below the principal sum of SEVENTY EIGHT  THOUSAND 00/100 DOLLARS ($78,000), withinterest on the unpaid principal balance thereon from time to time outstanding,at the rate of seven percent (7.00%) per annum, computed on a three hundredsixty (360)-day year, to be due and payable in installments of principal andinterest as follows:

 

(A)                              $78,000amortized over 36 months at 7% interest ($2,408.41/month). This Note isnon-recourse secured by 40,500 InnSuites Hospitality Trust shares. Monthlyinstallments of principal and interest to begin 30 days after the delivery ofthe shares.

 

(B)                                Paymentsto be made payable to:

TheAnderson Charitable Remainder Unitrust

3024W/ Sahuaro Dr.

Phoenix,AZ 85029

 

The 40,500 InnSuitesHospitality Trust shares will remain as security for the unpaid balance on theNote.

 

At the option ofthe Note Holder, late charges upon written notice are assessed as follows:

10 days late, $50 penalty

35 days late, $150 penalty

Over 35 days late, Note Holder could declare the notein default and call the entire amount due.

Should default be declared, units proportionate tounpaid balance will be returned to Note Holder.

 

Principal andinterest payable in lawful money of the United States.

 

If legalproceedings are entered into to recover on this Note, the undersigned agree(s)to pay such sum as the Court may fix as attorney’s fees.

 

The Makers andendorsers hereof severally waive diligence, demand, presentment for payment andprotest, and consent to the extension or time of payment of this Note withoutnotice.

 

 
|   | INNSUITES HOSPITALITY  TRUST,  an Ohio real estate investment trust |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                |
|   |                                                                |
|   |                                                                | By: | /s/ Marc E. Berg |   |
|   |                                                                | Name: | Marc E. Berg |
|   |                                                                | Title: | Secretary Treasurer |
|        |                                                                     |  |  |  |  |  |

 

1

----
#### BITTER SWEET PROPERTIES v. The CITY OF FARRELL

1640 CD 2016

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

10/20/2017

Mercer County Civil Division, No. 2015-1448

Affirmed/Vacated/Remanded
No. 12-5353.

#### Pryor *v.*Kentucky.

Ct. App. Ky. Certiorari denied.
1 The Honorable H. David Young, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern

District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).



## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 00-2316

___________ Dana A. Younger, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of * Social Security Administration, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: March 6, 2001 Filed: March 12, 2001

___________ Before BOWMAN, BEAM, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. DanaA. Younger appeals the District Court’s 1 order affirming the Commissioner’s decision to deny her disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. Younger alleged that since August 1995 she has been disabled from shortness of breath caused by asthma and bronchitis, and from arthritis-related pain and severe muscle spasms. After an administrative hearing, the administrative law judge-2-

(ALJ) found her not disabled based on the medical-vocational guidelines (guidelines). Having carefully reviewed the record, we affirm. Younger did not allege a mental problem in her disability application or at the hearing, and was not diagnosed with, or treated for, depression until almost a year after the ALJ rendered his decision. Cf. Smith v. Shalala , 987 F.2d 1371, 1375 (8th Cir. 1993) (finding that the ALJ properly discredited a psychiatrist’s report where the claimant did not allege disabling mental impairment in the application, had never sought or been referred for mental treatment, and merely made vague statements about nervousness). Thus, her suggestion that she is unable to perform the full range of sedentary work because of mental problems and also because of problems in using her hands—a nother limitation not mentioned in her application, at the hearing, or to her physicians—is meritless. The ALJ also properly relied on the guidelines in finding her not disabled. See Gray v. Apfel , 192 F.3d 799, 802 (8th Cir. 1999) (holding that the ALJ may rely on the guidelines when a claimant has only exertional restrictions). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
No. 11-11127.

#### Baker v. United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-24-1995
<CASH>                                           1,203
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   52,006
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,095
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                59,436
<PP&E>                                          35,699
<DEPRECIATION>                                  20,553
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  89,335
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           28,315
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           883
<OTHER-SE>                                      24,676
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    89,335
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                43,855
<CGS>                                           16,841
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,841
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                25,099
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 820
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,167
<INCOME-TAX>                                       478
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                689
<DISCONTINUED>                                    (59)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       630
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07
        

</TABLE>
p110488.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 11-0488

Focus Ready Draft 7/25/2011

ENGINEER: Arnold \ JD

PV (kg/yr): 

SUBMITTER: 

USE: 

 

OTHER USES: 

 

CRSS :

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consumer Use: 

SAT (concerns) (07/19/2011):

Related Cases and Related Cases and Misc SAT Info:

Ecotox Related Cases: 

Analogs: Human

Health Related Cases: 

Page 1

EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 5
p110488.eng

Migration to groundwater: Negligible

PBT rating: P2B1T1 PMN: P1B1T1 // Hyd Pdt: P2B1T1

Health: 1-2 Dermal, Drinking Water, Inhalation

Eco: 1 No releases to Water

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 2-3B

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER. 

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS:

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: No

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 11-0488

Processing: 

Number of Sites/ Location: 1

Days/yr: 40

Basis:

Process Description:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below

may coincide with daily releases from the other sources

to the same medium.

Incineration

High End: 1.1E+0 kg/site-day over 40 days/yr from 1 site

or 4.5E+1 kg/yr

to: 

from:

basis:

Page 2

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 5
p110488.eng

RELEASE TOTAL

4.5E+1 kg/yr 

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: 

Basis: 

Inhalation:

Dermal:

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 11-0488

Use: 

Number of Sites/ Location: 1

Days/yr: 83

Basis:

Process Description:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below

may coincide with daily releases from the other sources

to the same medium.

Air

Output 2: 1.4E+0 kg/site-day over 83 days/yr from 1 site

to: 

from: 

basis:

Incineration

High End: 5.4E-1 kg/site-day over 83 days/yr from 1 site

or 4.5E+1 kg/yr

to: 

from:

basis: 

Page 3

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 5
p110488.eng

Incineration

Conservative: 1.8E-1 kg/site-day over 83 days/yr from 1

site

or 1.5E+1 kg/yr

to: 

from:

basis:

Landfill

Output 2: 1.2E+1 kg/site-day over 83 days/yr from 1 site

or 1.0E+3 kg/yr

to: 

from: 

basis:

RELEASE TOTAL

1.2E+3 kg/yr 

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: 

Basis:

Inhalation:

 

 

Dermal:

Page 4

EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 5
p110488.eng

Page 5

EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 5
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>         5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains a summary of financial information extracted from
the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet and Condensed Consolidated Statement of
Earnings and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                          24,661
<SECURITIES>                                   180,504
<RECEIVABLES>                                   61,392
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,800
<INVENTORY>                                    646,176
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               988,724
<PP&E>                                         842,797
<DEPRECIATION>                                 347,823
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,607,275
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          424,487
<BONDS>                                        409,622
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           490
<OTHER-SE>                                     666,060
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,607,275
<SALES>                                        587,113
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               587,113
<CGS>                                          384,888
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  540,055
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   520
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,136
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 40,922
<INCOME-TAX>                                    15,960
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             24,962
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    24,962
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.50
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Dawn H. Bertsche, Senior Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Multi-Color Corporation (the Company), certify pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 7, 2006



By:

/s/ Dawn H. BertscheDawn H. BertscheSenior Vice President Finance,Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
# C_2022222EN.01003702.xml

| 7.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 222/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 222/37

---

Action brought on 13 April 2022 — TA Towers v EUIPO — Wobben Properties (Building materials)

(Case T-202/22)

(2022/C 222/61)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: TA Towers ApS (Odense, Denmark) (represented by: L. Andersen, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Wobben Properties GmbH (Aurich, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the design at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Design at issue: Community design No 6 352 332-0001 (Building materials)

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 February 2022 in Case R 2493/2020-3

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | annul the decision of the Cancellation Division of 20 November 2020 in Case ICD 108 309; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Cancellation Division of 20 November 2020 in Case ICD 108 309;

| — | order EUIPO and the invalidity applicant to pay the costs of the proceedings before the Cancellation Division, the Board of Appeal and the General Court. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and the invalidity applicant to pay the costs of the proceedings before the Cancellation Division, the Board of Appeal and the General Court.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 6 of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 6 of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002;

| — | Infringement of Article 8 of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8 of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002;

| — | Infringement of Article 62 of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 62 of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.

---
No. 12-195.

#### Stierhoff *v.*United States.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.