alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 9/30/00
RALSTON PURINA COMPANY BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF EARNINGS AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000

<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         112,200
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  227,700
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,600
<INVENTORY>                                    130,500
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               529,900
<PP&E>                                       1,224,800
<DEPRECIATION>                                 608,200
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,943,600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          566,600
<BONDS>                                      1,245,300
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        32,900
<OTHER-SE>                                     405,700
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,943,600
<SALES>                                      2,763,300
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,763,300
<CGS>                                        1,123,500
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,123,500
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               895,400
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   800
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             164,400
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                579,200
<INCOME-TAX>                                   166,900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            436,500
<DISCONTINUED>                                  93,900
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   530,400
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.84
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.82



</TABLE>
No. 12-5029.

#### Hoffman *v.*Stulga et al.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-10297.

#### Pruett *v.*Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE NINE
MONTHS ENDED 9-30-96 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES THERETO CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S QUARTERLY
REPORT ON FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000818813
<NAME> BITSTREAM INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         777,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,927,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   282,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,086,000
<PP&E>                                       3,370,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,440,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,776,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,434,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         3,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     32,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,959,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,776,000
<SALES>                                      8,039,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,039,000
<CGS>                                        1,452,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,440,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                63,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,084,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (96,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,180,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,180,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        



</TABLE>
#### Nicanor SOTO-SOTO, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 16-72636

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*608Submitted February 13, 2018 *

Filed February 22, 2018

Vikram .Badrinath, Esquire, Attorney, Vikram Badrinath, PC, Tucson, AZ, for Petitioner

Laura M.L. Maroldy, Trial Attorney, Lindsay Corliss, DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel ICE,. Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent

Before: LEAVY, FERNANDEZ, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R, App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Nicanor Soto-Soto, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board.of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for cancellation of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo constitutional claims and questions of law. *Mohammed v. Gonzales,*400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

Contrary to Soto-Soto’s contention, the agency applied the correct legal standard and did not fail to sufficiently explain its reasoning. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(l)(D); *Najmabadi v. Holder,*597 F.3d 983, 990 (9th Cir. 2010).

We reject Soto-Soto’s unsupported contention that the IJ was not neutral.

We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary determination that Soto-Soto failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to his qualifying relatives. *See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales,*424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir. 2005); *see also Mendez-Castro v. Mukasey,*552 F.3d 975, 980-81 (9th Cir. 2009) (the court lacks jurisdiction to review application of the exceptional and extremely unusual hardship standard to the facts of a case, “be they disputed or otherwise”). Soto-Soto’s contentions that the agency failed to consider his contentions and relevant evidence of hardship are not supported by the record, and do not amount to colorable claims that would invoke our jurisdiction. *See Vilchiz-Soto v. Holder,*688 F.3d 642, 644 (9th Cir. 2012) (absent a colorable legal or constitutional claim, the court lacks jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary determination regarding hardship); *Martinez-Rosas,*424 F.3d at 930 (“To be colorable in this context, ... the claim must have some possible validity.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3,
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of DataJungle Software Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:  The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the Form 10-KSB) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-KSB.  Dated: April 16, 2007/s/Edward Munden
Edward Munden
President & Chief Executive Officer   The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-KSB pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-B and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-KSB for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.           1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION   EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
REGISTRANTS  FIRST  QUARTER 1998  CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE  SHEET AND  CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT  OF  OPERATIONS  FOR THE THREE  MONTHS  ENDED  MARCH  31,  1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1
<CASH>                                           1,963,655
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,245,912
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,046,803
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                           5,148,570
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,523,704
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  44,379,049
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                         23,531,694
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,384,891
<COMMON>                                        10,425,188
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,201,060
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    44,379,049
<SALES>                                          5,560,823
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,527,163
<CGS>                                              791,442
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,647,111
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   162,269
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 505,515
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    388,825
<INCOME-TAX>                                       156,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                232,825
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       232,825
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .08
                                               

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Clover
Income Properties II L.P. 1996 Third Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000818671
<NAME> CLOVER INCOME PROPERTIES II L.P.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          90,098
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 120,216
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     104,860
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   120,216
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                26,737
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                33,900
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   149,244
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     8.53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.1

                         18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
              SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Amerimmune Pharmaceuticals,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31,
2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.


/s/ Rex H. Lewis
------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
February 18, 2003
#### Roberto Rodolfo GUARDADO-LOPEZ, Petitioner v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS, III, U. S. Attorney General, Respondent

No. 17-60185 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed February 22, 2018

*315Malvern Clopton Burnett, Law Offices of Malvern C. Burnett, New Orleans, LA, for Petitioner

Jessica Dawgert, Senior Litigation Counsel, Allison R. Frayer, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for Respondent

Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, afid GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Roberto Rodolfo Guardado-Lopez petitions for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing his appeal of the order of the. Immigration Judge (IJ) denying him asylum, withholding of removal, and Convention Against Torture (CAT) relief. As the BIA resolved the merits of Guardado-Lo-pez’s appeal, its decision constitutes a final reviewable order despite that the BIA remanded to the IJ for further proceedings as to Guardado-Lopez’s request for voluntary departure. *See Holguin-Mendoza v. Lynch,*835 F.3d 508, 509 (5th Cir. 2016). Since the BIA relied in substantial part on the IJ’s order, we may consider the reasoning of both the BIA and the IJ. *See Wang v. Holder,*569 F.3d 531, 536 (5th Cir. 2009).

Guardado-Lopez does not challenge the BIA’s dismissal of his asylum claim as untimely; accordingly, he has abandoned this claim. *See Soadjede v. Ashcroft,*324 F.3d 830, 833 (5th Cir. 2003). We review for substantial evidence the determination that an alien is not eligible for withholding of removal or CAT relief. *Zhang v. Gonzales,*432 F.3d 339, 344 (5th Cir. 2005). Under this standard, we may not reverse a factual finding unless the evidence compels it. *Wang,*569 F.3d at 537. Guardado-Lopez must carry the burden of demonstrating that the evidence compels a contrary conclusion. *See Zhao v. Gonzales,*404 F.3d 295, 306 (5th Cir. 2005).

To obtain withholding of removal, an applicant must “ ‘establish that his or her life or freedom would be threatened in the proposed country of removal on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.’ ” *Ramirez-Mejia v. Lynch,*794 F.3d 485, 492 (5th Cir. 2015) (quoting 8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(b)). As Guardado-Lopez does not meaningfully address the BIA’s determination that he did not establish that he would be persecuted on account of his familial ties if he were returned to Honduras, he fails to show that the denial of withholding of removal is unsupported by substantial evidence. *See Zhang,*432 F.3d at 344. We lack jurisdiction to consider Guardado-Lopez’s claims that the denial of CAT relief violates his due process rights since the procedural errors he alleges were correctable by, but not exhausted before, the BIA. *See Roy v. Ashcroft,*389 F.3d 132, 137 (5th Cir. 2004).

The petition for review is DISMISSED IN PART for lack of jurisdiction and DENIED IN PART.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1031 

Condemning the cyber attacks on American persons and organizations conducting research related to COVID-19 and expressing the sense of the 

House of Representatives that those responsible for perpetrating such 

belligerent acts should face consequences. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 30, 2020 

Mr. KINZINGER submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Condemning the cyber attacks on American persons and 

organizations conducting research related to COVID-19 

and expressing the sense of the House of Representatives 

that those responsible for perpetrating such belligerent 

acts should face consequences. 

Whereas the novel COVID-19 pandemic is a global crisis that 

has killed over 128,000 American citizens; 

Whereas American research institutions in both the public 

and private sectors have been the target of attempted 

cyber network attacks while working diligently to develop 

treatments and a cure for this disease; 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1031 IH 

Whereas health care, pharmaceutical, and research sectors 

working on COVID-19 response are the prime targets of 

these attacks; 

Whereas, on May 13, 2020, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) issued a public announcement to 

raise awareness of the cyber threat to COVID-19-related 

research and that any potential theft of such research 

would jeopardize the delivery of secure, effective, and efficient treatment options for American citizens; 

Whereas the FBI and CISA attributed the attacks on these 

American organizations to the People’s Republic of China 

(PRC); 

Whereas the PRC has a long history of conducting cyber-attacks on Americans and the United States Government, 

including the 2015 hack of the Office of Personnel Management, which resulted in the theft of private information belonging to millions of American citizens: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That— 

2 (1) the House of Representatives condemns in 

3 the harshest of terms the cyber-attacks perpetrated 

4 against those American persons and organizations 

5 engaged in COVID-19 research; and 

6 (2) it is the sense of the House of Representa7 tives that the Administration should respond to 

8 these attacks to punish those responsible and to dis9 suade others from engaging in the same acts by uti10 lizing existing authorities, including the implementaVerDate Sep 11 2014 02:33 Jul 01, 2020 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR1031.IH HR1031

khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1031 IH 

1 tion of sanctions against those foreign persons en2 gaged in such acts at the behest of the PRC. 

Æ 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with BILLS
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATION
of
Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended I, Allen F. Grum, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Rand Capital Corporation and
subsidiaries; 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this annual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this annual report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors
and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. Dated: March 28, 2005/s/ Allen F. GrumAllen F. Grum, President(Principal Executive Officer of Rand CapitalCorporation and equivalent of PrincipalExecutive Officer of Rand Capital SBIC, L.P.)