alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       3,939,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               22,859,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                (5,117,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            25,102,000
<PP&E>                                     134,639,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (81,302,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             120,920,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       25,701,000
<BONDS>                                    100,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 16,586,000
<COMMON>                                       162,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (21,867,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               120,920,000
<SALES>                                     27,894,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            27,894,000
<CGS>                                       23,206,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               28,684,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,230,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (4,020,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (4,020,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (4,020,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.27)
        

</TABLE>
PREGNANT WORKERS

FAIRNESS ACT

(PWFA)

WHAT IS PWFA?

The Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA) is a federal law

that, starting June 27, 2023, requires covered employers to

provide “reasonable accommodations” to a qualified worker’s

known limitations related to pregnancy, childbirth, or related

medical conditions, unless the accommodation will cause the

employer an “undue hardship.” An undue hardship is defined

as causing significant difficulty or expense.

"Reasonable

accommodations”

are changes to the

work environment or

the way things are

usually done at work.

WHAT ARE SOME POSSIBLE ACCOMMODATIONS

FOR PREGNANT WORKERS?

Being able to sit or drink water

Receiving closer parking

Having flexible hours

Receiving appropriately sized

uniforms and safety apparel

Receiving additional break time to

use the bathroom, eat, and rest

Taking leave or time off to recover

from childbirth

Being excused from strenuous

activities and/or exposure to

chemicals not safe for pregnancy

WHAT OTHER FEDERAL EMPLOYMENT LAWS

MAY APPLY TO PREGNANT WORKERS?

Other laws that apply to workers affected by pregnancy, childbirth, or related

medical conditions, include:

Title VII which prohibits employment discrimination based on sex,

pregnancy, or other protected categories (enforced by the U.S. Equal

Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC))

The ADA which prohibits employment discrimination based on disability

(enforced by the EEOC)

The Family and Medical Leave Act which provides unpaid leave for certain

workers for pregnancy and to bond with a new child (enforced by the U.S

Department of Labor)

The PUMP Act which provides nursing mothers a time and private place to

pump at work (enforced by the U.S. Department of Labor)

Learn more at www.EEOC.gov/Pregnancy-Discrimination.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. §1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Arrhythmia Research Technology, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned Chief Financial Officer certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

*A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Arrhythmia Research Technology, Inc. and will be retained by Arrhythmia Research Technology, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*

 

 

X-4
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Resource America, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Edward E. Cohen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





                               /s/ Edward E. Cohen
                               ------------------------
                               Edward E. Cohen
                               Chief Executive Officer
                               December 29, 2003
ABU DHABI

AUSTIN

BEIJING

DALLAS

DUBAI

HONG KONG

HOUSTON

LONDON

MOSCOW

NEW YORK

PALO ALTO

RIYADH

WASHINGTON

ONE SHELL PLAZA

910 LOUISIANA

HOUSTON, TEXAS

77002-4995

TEL +1 713.229.1234

FAX +1 713.229.1522

www.bakerbotts.com

HOU03:1233301.1

Matthew L. Kuryla

713/229.1114

FAX 713/229.2714

Matthew.Kuryla@bakerbotts.com

March 11, 2010

Docket No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2005-01772

Environmental Protection Agency

Mail Code 6102T

1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW

Washington, D.C. 20460

Re: Request for Extension of Comment Period

Proposed National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone

Docket No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2005-0172

Ladies and Gentlemen:

I am writing on behalf of the Texas Industry Project ("TIP") regarding EPA's proposal to lower 

the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for ozone from levels set in 2008. TIP is comprised 

of sixty-two companies in the chemical, refining, oil and gas, electronics, forest products, 

terminal, electric utility, and transportation industries with operations in Texas.

TIP members are proud of the air quality improvement achieved in Texas to date. Over the past 

eight years, statewide ambient ozone and NOx levels have fallen by 22% and 46%, respectively. 

This success is due in large part to substantial investments by our members in effective 

emissions reduction strategies. Having stepped up to the challenge with real and sustained 

improvements, TIP members are proud to have contributed to our State's clean air.

Any new ozone standards set by EPA would substantially affect TIP's members. EPA's 

Regulatory Impact Analysis suggests that the new standards may require drastic emissions 

reductions throughout the state of Texas in addition to all currently known control measures. 

The State of Texas faces a significant challenge to obtain additional emission reductions. 

Background levels of ozone account for a substantial and growing share of monitored ozone in 

Texas, and it is unclear how these levels will be accounted for under the proposed new standard. 

The State of Texas is further challenged by federal preemption of mobile emission sources, from 

which additional emission reductions are beyond the reach of traditional control strategies. 

TIP respectfully requests that EPA extend the public comment period by sixty days, until 

May 21, 2010. EPA is not compelled to finalize its proposal by the self-imposed deadline of

August 31, 2010. The complexity of issues and the magnitude of impacts associated with ozone 

standards in the proposed ranges merits additional time for public comment so that TIP can more 

effectively contribute to EPA's deliberations.

Sincerely,

Matthew L. Kuryla
# C_2022158EN.01001002.xml

| 11.4.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 158/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.4.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 158/10

---

Action brought on 28 January 2022 — Rivière v Parliament and ID

(Case T-54/22)

(2022/C 158/12)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Jérôme Rivière (Paris, France) (represented by: B. Kuchukian, lawyer)

Defendants: European Parliament and the political group Identity and Democracy (ID)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul first, the provisional suspensory decision of 21 January 2022 and, second, the expulsion decision of 25 January 2022; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul first, the provisional suspensory decision of 21 January 2022 and, second, the expulsion decision of 25 January 2022;

| — | order the immediate suspension of both decisions. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the immediate suspension of both decisions.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action seeking the annulment, first, of the decision of 21 January 2022 of the bureau of the political group Identity and Democracy (ID) suspending him from the group for a period of two months and, second, of the decision of 25 January 2022 of the political group Identity and Democracy (ID) expelling him from that group, the applicant complains that, as to form, those decisions fail to comply with the basic disciplinary process and, as to substance, they have no valid basis.

---
EXHIBIT 10.2


                                     ALLONGE

     THIS ALLONGE is attached to that certain  Promissory Note for the principal
sum of Four Million Nine Hundred  Thousand Dollars  ($4,900,000)  dated July 31,
2001  executed  by Joseph P.  Martori,  the  Chairman of the Board of VCA Nevada
Incorporated,  an Arizona corporation  ("Borrower"),  in favor of Las Vegas Golf
Center, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company ("Assignor").

     PAY TO THE ORDER OF ILX Resorts Incorporated, an Arizona corporation.


ASSIGNOR:


LAS VEGAS GOLF CENTER, L.L.C., a
Delaware limited liability company

By: ______________________________

Its: _____________________________


Date: ____________________________
#### STANFORD FRANCIS *v.*COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

(AC 33511)

Bear, Sheldon and Harper, Js.

Argued November 20

officially released December 17, 2013

Per Curiam.

The appeal is dismissed.
No. 11-11066.

#### Hill *v.*Clarke, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections.

Sup. Ct. Va. Certiorari denied.
No. 12-5156.

#### Sturm *v.*United States.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# C_2023164EN.01002502.xml

| 8.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 164/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 164/25

---

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 March 2023 (Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bucureşti — Romania) — Armaprocure SRL v Ministerul Apărării Naţionale, BlueSpace Technology SRL

(Case C-493/22, (1) ARMAPROCURE)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Public Procurement - Directive 2009/81/EC - Article 55(4) - Article 57(2) - Interest in bringing proceedings - Access to the review procedures - Tenderer excluded from a public procurement procedure by a decision of the contracting authority that has become final - National regulation depriving such a tenderer of access to a means of appeal - No interest in bringing proceedings)

(2023/C 164/31)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Curtea de Apel Bucureşti

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant at first instance and appellant: Armaprocure SRL

Defendants at first instance and respondents: Ministerul Apărării Naţionale, BlueSpace Technology SRL

Operative part of the order

Article 55(4) and Article 57(2) of Directive 2009/81/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 on the coordination of procedures for the award of certain works contracts, supply contracts and service contracts by contracting authorities or entities in the fields of defence and security, and amending Directives 2004/17/EC and 2004/18/EC,

must be interpreted as precluding a tenderer, that has been excluded from a public procurement procedure by a decision of the contracting authority that has become final, from having access to a means of appeal against, or review of the contract concluded with the successful tenderer.

---

(1)  Date lodged: 22.7.2022.

---
No. 12-76.

#### El Paso Entertainment, Inc., et al. *v.*City of El Paso, Texas.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Jill M. Broadfoot, the Chief
Financial Officer of Vical Incorporated (the Company), hereby certifies that, to the best of her knowledge:



| | 1. | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the Periodic
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by
the Periodic Report and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Periodic Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|Dated: May 7, 2010     
|                       
|/s/ JILL M. BROADFOOT  
|Jill M. Broadfoot      
|Chief Financial Officer

THIS CERTIFICATION
ACCOMPANIES THE FORM 10-Q TO WHICH IT RELATES, IS NOT DEEMED FILED WITH THE SEC AND IS NOT TO BE INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO ANY FILING OF THE COMPANY UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, OR THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934, AS AMENDED (WHETHER MADE BEFORE OR AFTER THE DATE OF THE FORM 10-Q), IRRESPECTIVE OF ANY GENERAL INCORPORATION LANGUAGE CONTAINED IN SUCH FILING. A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS CERTIFICATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE COMPANY AND WILL BE
RETAINED BY THE COMPANY AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
No. 11-10659.

#### Kopsho *v.*Florida.

Sup. Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied.
# C_2023179EN.01004901.xml

| 22.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/49

---

Order of the General Court of 28 March 2023 — Primicerj v Commission

(Case T-612/22) (1)

(Action for annulment - Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Initial refusal of access - Act not open to challenge - Inadmissibility - Request for the Court to issue directions - Lack of jurisdiction)

(2023/C 179/72)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Paola Primicerj (Rome, Italy) (represented by: E. Iorio, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Spina, acting as Agent)

Re:

By her action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the Commission’s decision of 2 August 2022 refusing her request for access to the supplementary letter of formal notice of 15 July 2022, issued by the Commission to the Italian Republic in the context of infringement procedure 2016/4081, relating to the compatibility with EU law of the national law governing the services provided by magistrati onorari (honorary judges).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed in part on the ground of clear lack of jurisdiction and in part for being manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed in part on the ground of clear lack of jurisdiction and in part for being manifestly inadmissible.

| 2. | There is no longer any need to rule on the application for leave to intervene submitted by Mr Gabriele Di Girolamo, Ms Roberta Tesei and the Associazione Nazionale Giudici di Pace (ANGDP). |
| --- | --- |

2.

There is no longer any need to rule on the application for leave to intervene submitted by Mr Gabriele Di Girolamo, Ms Roberta Tesei and the Associazione Nazionale Giudici di Pace (ANGDP).

| 3. | Ms Paola Primicerji shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Ms Paola Primicerji shall pay the costs.

| 4. | Mr Di Girolamo, Ms Tesei and the ANGDP shall bear their own costs relating to their application for leave to intervene. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Mr Di Girolamo, Ms Tesei and the ANGDP shall bear their own costs relating to their application for leave to intervene.

---

(1)  OJ C 432, 14.11.2022.

---
# C_2022138EN.01002302.xml

| 28.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/23

---

Action brought on 19 January 2022 — Romedor Pharma v EUIPO — Perfect Care Distribution (PERFECT FARMA CERVIRON)

(Case T-36/22)

(2022/C 138/27)

Language in which the application was lodged: Romanian

Parties

Applicant: Romedor Pharma SRL (Focşani, Romania) (represented by: E. Dicu, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Perfect Care Distribution (Bucharest, Romania)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark PERFECT FARMA CERVIRON — EU trade mark No 10 864 511

Procedure before EUIPO: proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 17 November 2021 in Case R 522/2021-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | uphold the action as formulated and reasoned; |
| --- | --- |

—

uphold the action as formulated and reasoned;

| — | annul the contested decision and, consequently, uphold the application for a declaration of invalidity in respect of EU trade mark No 10 864 511. |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision and, consequently, uphold the application for a declaration of invalidity in respect of EU trade mark No 10 864 511.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 60(1)(c), in conjunction with Article 8(4), of Regulation (EU) No 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 60(1)(c), in conjunction with Article 8(4), of Regulation (EU) No 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
Exhibit 32.1
            CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                     OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Kenneth R. Risk, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the annual
report of George Risk Industries, Inc. on Form 10K dated April 30, 2012
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form
10K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of George Risk Industries, Inc.



Date:  July 27, 2012			By:  /s/  Kenneth R. Risk
					Kenneth R. Risk
					President and Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1)   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,                and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                      |                                   |                                    |
|-------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
| Date: December              14, 2006 | By:                          | /s/ Jonathan              Z. Cohen |
|                                      | Jonathan                Z. Cohen       |
|                                      | Chief                Executive Officer |
No. 12-5461.

#### Williams *v.*Lockett, Warden.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.