alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheet and Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           4,012
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   67,468
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,997)
<INVENTORY>                                     65,323
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               166,360
<PP&E>                                          85,041
<DEPRECIATION>                                (29,358)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 567,470
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           96,163
<BONDS>                                        434,595
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           591
<OTHER-SE>                                      30,479
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   567,470
<SALES>                                        170,067
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               170,067
<CGS>                                           94,331
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   94,331
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                74,734
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   200
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,695
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (18,717)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (7,400)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (11,317)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (11,317)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1164 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 1164

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                       October 1, 2020.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order without 
intervention of any point of order to consider in the House the resolution (H. 
Res. 1153) condemning unwanted, unnecessary medical procedures on individuals 
without their full, informed consent. The amendment to the resolution printed in 
the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution shall be 
considered as adopted. The resolution, as amended, shall be considered as read. 
The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the resolution and 
preamble, as amended, to adoption without intervening motion or demand for 
division of the question except one hour of debate equally divided and 
controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on the 
Judiciary.
    Sec. 2.  Upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order without 
intervention of any point of order to consider in the House the resolution (H. 
Res. 1154) condemning QAnon and rejecting the conspiracy theories it promotes. 
The resolution shall be considered as read. The previous question shall be 
considered as ordered on the resolution and preamble to adoption without 
intervening motion or demand for division of the question except one hour of 
debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member 
of the Committee on the Judiciary.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
No. 12-154.

#### Mussack *v.*Hawaii Board of Education.

Int. Ct. App. Haw. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 54 (Thursday, March 20, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 13394]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-7114]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--the ATM Forum

    Notice is hereby given that, on January 28, 1997, pursuant to 
Sec. 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. Sec. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), the ATM Forum 
(``Forum'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in 
its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of 
extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, the following have been added as members of the Forum: 
Hubbell Premise Wiring Incorporated, Stonington, CT; and Retix, Marina 
del Rey, CA. The following have withdrawn their membership from the 
Forum: Mitel Semiconductor AB; Teltrend, Inc.; and TUT Systems, Inc. 
The following have changed their membership from auditing members to 
principal members: Cell IT Incorporated (formerly FiberTel); AudioCodes 
Ltd.; Hekimian Laboratories, Inc.; and Maker Communications 
Incorporated.
    No changes have been made in the planning activities of the Forum. 
Membership remains open, and the Forum intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On April 19, 1993, the Forum filed its original notification 
pursuant to Sec. 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a 
notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Sec. 6(b) of the Act of June 
2, 1993 (58 FR 31415). The last notification was filed on October 30, 
1996 and a notice was published in the Federal Register on December 11, 
1996 (61 FR 65238).
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 97-7114 Filed 3-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 56 (Monday, March 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13891-13892]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-7267]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Natonal Institute of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Meeting: AIDS Research Advisory Committee, NIAID

    Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given of the 
meeting of the AIDS Research Advisory Committee, National Institute of 
Allergy and Infectious Diseases, on May 20, 1997, in Conference Room D 
of the Natcher Conference Center, Building 45, at the National 
Institutes of Health, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, Maryland.
    The entire meeting will be open to the public from 8:30 a.m. until 
adjournment. The AIDS Research Advisory Committee (ARAC) advises and 
makes recommendations to the Director, National Institute of Allergy 
and Infectious Diseases, on all aspects of research on HIV and AIDS 
related to the mission of the Division of AIDS (DAIDS).
    The Committee will provide advice on scientific priorities, policy, 
and program balance at the Division level. The Committee will review 
the progress and productivity of ongoing efforts, and identify critical 
gaps/obstacles to progress. Attendance by the public will be limited to 
space available.
    Ms. Rona L. Siskind, Executive Secretary, AIDS Research Advisory 
Committee, DAIDS, NIAID, NIH, Solar Building, Room 2A21, telephone 301-
435-3732, will provide a summary of the meeting and a roster of 
committee members upon request. Individuals who plan to attend and need 
special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other 
reasonable accommodations, should contact Ms. Siskind in advance of the 
meeting.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Immunology, Allergic and Immunologic Disease Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health)


[[Page 13892]]


    Dated: March 18, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-7267 Filed 3-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### Anant Kumar TRIPATI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CORIZON INCORPORATED; Dimitric Catsaros, Dr.; Joseph Moyse, Dr., Defendants-Appellees, Arizona Department of Corrections, Intervenor-Defendant-Appellee.

No. 16-15598

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted February 15, 2018 Pasadena, California

Filed February 27, 2018

Kathy Pomeroy, WilmerHale, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellant

Joseph Scott Conlon, John Anthony Kle-can, Esquire, Renaud Cook Drury Mesa-ros, PA, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendants-Ap-pellees

Paul Edward Carter, Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Arizona Attorney General, Tucson, AZ, Michael E. Gottfried, Arizona Attorney General’s Office, Phoenix, AZ, for Intervenor-Defendant-Appel-lee

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, and REINHARDT and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

*711MEMORANDUM *

Anant Kumar Tripati filed a pro se suit against Corizon, Inc.—the private provider of medical care to Arizona inmates—alleging violations of his civil rights. The district court found that Tripati lied about being blind in support of a procedural motion to have his typewriter returned to him, and dismissed the case as a sanction. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse the dismissal and remand for further proceedings.

“We review sanctions imposed by a district court for abuse of discretion.” *Halaco Eng’g Co. v. Costle,*843 F.2d 376, 379 (9th Cir. 1988). However, “[i]n cases where the drastic sanctions of dismissal or default are ordered, the range of discretion for a district court is narrowed.” *Id.*at 380. “The most critical criterion for the imposition of a dismissal sanction is that the misconduct penalized must relate to matters in controversy in such a way as to interfere with the rightful decision of the case. This rule is rooted in general due process concerns. There must be a nexus between the party’s actionable conduct and the merits of his case.” *Id.*at 381 (citations omitted).

The district court found that a nexus existed because “[Tripati]’s misrepresentations concern[ed] his medical condition, which is directly at issue in this lawsuit.” The district court defined the nexus at too high a level of generality. Tripati never sought any relief on the merits (as opposed to an intermediate procedural issue) on the basis of any issues with his eyesight. There was therefore “no nexus between the party’s actionable conduct and the merits of his case” and no “interfere[nce] with the rightful decision of the case.” *Id.*

We recognize that this is a close case and that the district judge was presented with a difficult decision. Nevertheless, given the pro se status of the plaintiff and our high standard for dismissal, we are obligated to reverse. Accordingly, the case is remanded for further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Order entered December 12, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-01410-CV

IN RE KEVIN NEAL GLASPIE, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 203rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F18-57718-P

ORDER

Before Justices Myers, Molberg, and Nowell

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this original proceeding for want 

of jurisdiction.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
##### 



Exhibit 99(a)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
Section 1350), each of the undersigned officers of Rainbow Technologies, Inc.
(the Company), does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of
the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the 10-Q Report) that to their
knowledge:

(1)  the 10-Q Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information contained in the 10-Q Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ WALTER W. STRAUB
Walter W. Straub
President and Chief Executive Officer
November 12, 2002



/s/ PATRICK E. FEVERY
Patrick E. Fevery
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
November 12, 2002



This certification accompanies this 10-Q Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for the
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
| (1)   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  DATE:      November 14, 2008 |  /s/ David A. Garrison                                   |
|------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|                               | David      A. Garrison                                        |
|                               | Executive      Vice President andChief      Financial Officer |

----

----
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER OF REINSTATEMENT

Appellate case name: Jose Alfonso Guerrero v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-11-01013-CR

Trial court case number: 1741578

Trial court: County Criminal Court at Law No. 4 of Harris County

This case was abated and remanded to the trial court on August 17, 2012. In the order of 

abatement, we ordered the trial court to determine whether appellant’s counsel, W. Troy 

McKinney, had abandoned this appeal and, if not, to set a date certain when appellant’s brief 

would be due. The trial court held a hearing on our order of abatement on September 4, 2012, 

and the court reporter has filed a record of the hearing. The reporter’s record shows that the trial 

court found that counsel had not abandoned the appeal and ordered appellant’s brief filed by 

October 3, 2012. Accordingly, we REINSTATE this case on the Court’s active docket.

Appellant’s brief is ORDERED to be filed no later than October 3, 2012. Given the 

extensive delay in the filing of appellant’s brief, no further extensions will be granted.

Appellee’s brief, if any, is ORDERED to be filed no later than 30 days from the date of 

the filing of appellant’s brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(b).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Justice Harvey Brown

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: September 17, 2012
No. 12-5039.

#### Postelle *v.*Oklahoma.

Ct. Crim. App. Okla. Certiorari denied.
Wyoming
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

DOWNINGTOWN AREA SCHOOL

DISTRICT

v.

CHESTER COUNTY BOARD OF

ASSESSMENT APPEALS TAX PARCEL

NO.: 33

- 5

- 43.3

PETITION OF: DOWNINGTOWN AREA

SCHOOL DISTRICT :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 678 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court

DOWNINGTOWN AREA SCHOOL

DISTRICT

v.

CHESTER COUNTY BOARD OF

ASSESSMENT APPEALS TAX PARCEL

NO.: 33

- 5

- 43.2

PETITION OF: DOWNINGTOWN AREA

SCHOOL DISTRICT :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 679 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 12 th day of June, 2024, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

GRANTED . The issues, as stated by petitioner, are:[ 678 MAL 2023 and 679 MAL 2023 ]

- 2

(1) Whether the Commonwealth Court Majority incorrectly held that the School District must appeal all potentially underassessed properties in the School District in order to comply with the Uniformity Clause of the Pennsylvania Constitution,[ P A

. C ONST

. art. VIII, §1,] which holding is inconsistent with Pennsylvania Supreme Court precedent explicitly recognizing that there will never be perfect uniformity in real estate taxation, and constitutes a wholly impractical requirement?

(2) Whether the Commonwealth Court Majority incorrectly held that the School District implemented its tax assessment appeal policy in an arbitrary

fashion

— where the factual basis for such holding was not established at trial, is explicitly contradicted by the record, and improperly d isregards the totality of the trial evidence and testimony

— and is inconsistent with the standards set forth by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, as well as Commonwealth Court precedent?
No. 12-5385.

#### Lopez Vasquez *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 12-128.

#### Pooh Bah Enterprises, Inc. *v.*City of Chicago, Illinois, et al.

App. Ct. Ill., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.
No. 12-102.

#### Maldonado *v.*Superior Court of California, San Mateo County, et al.

Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 45 (Friday, March 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 10625]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5585]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

Associated Health Professions Review Subcommittee of the Special 
Medical Advisory Group, Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice that a meeting 
of the Associated Health Professions Review Subcommittee of the Special 
Medical Advisory Group will be held March 11 and 12, 1997. This 
subcommittee is established to review and recommend changes in Veterans 
Health Administration's (VHA) role and priorities in education and 
training, specifically with reference to the use of associated health 
professionals in the delivery of healthcare. Associated health 
disciplines are defined as all healthcare providers other than 
physicians. The meeting on both days will be held at the Department of 
Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW, Room 830, Washington, DC. The 
meeting will convene on March 11 from 7:00 p.m. until 9:00 p.m. and on 
March 12 from 8:30 a.m. until approximately 3:00 p.m.
    On March 11, the subcommittee will review the previously identified 
opportunities and barriers related to accomplishing the subcommittee's 
charge and will develop strategies to overcome the barriers.
    On March 12, the subcommittee will identify consultants and 
additional information needed by the subcommittee. The will analyze 
information from various sources to begin developing the 
recommendations related to the subcommittee's charge.
    The meeting will be open to the public. Those who plan to attend or 
who have questions concerning the meeting should contact Linda Johnson, 
Ph.D., R.N., Acting Director, Associated Health Professions Office 
(143), at 202-273-8372.

    Dated: February 24, 1997.

    By Direction of the Secretary.
Heyward Bannister,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-5585 Filed 3-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
November 26, 2013

VIA EMAIL & REGULATIONS.GOV

Esta Rosenberg Brett Kruger United States Department of Transportation
Office of International Aviation U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Division 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

X-44 Washington, DC 20590 esta.rosenberg@dot.gov brett.kruger@dot.gov

Re: Applications of Hawaiian Airlines, In c. and United Airlines, Inc. in the
Matter of 2010 U.S.-Haneda Combina tion Services Allo cation Proceeding,
Docket DOT-OST-2010-0018

Dear Ms. Rosenberg and Mr. Kruger:

We write on behalf of Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. (“Hawaiian”) in response to Order 2013- 11-9 (the “Order”) issued by the Department on November 14, 2013 in the above-referenced proceeding. The Order requested applications for a single slot pair for scheduled combination U.S.-Haneda services that is being returned to the Department by American Airlines.

On October 24, 2013, Hawaiian filed an applicat ion for the available slot pair for the purpose of initiating first-of-its -kind service from Kona Intern ational Airport, Kona, Hawaii (“Kona”) to Tokyo International Airport (“Haneda”). As contemplated by the Order, Hawaiian incorporates the contents of th at application by reference. See Order at 4. Hawaiian’s Application contained all the information requested in the Order, so no supplementary information is being provided at this time.Esta Rosenberg Brett Kruger Page 2

Sincerely,

/s/

Jonathan B. Hill
J. Parker Erkmann Benjamin Berlin
Dow Lohnes PLLC 1200 New Hampshire Ave., NW #800 Washington, DC 20036

202-776-2725 202-776-2000 (fax) jhill@dowlohnes.com perkmann@dowlohnes.com
bberlin@dowlohnes.com

Counsel for Hawaiian Airlines, Inc.

CC: Hoyt Zia, Hawaiian Airlines, Inc.
Service ListEsta Rosenberg Brett Kruger Page 3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoi ng Letter Incorporating the October 24, 2013 Application of Hawaiian Airlines by Reference was served this 26th day of November, 2013 via email transmission on the following:

megan.lawrence@alaskaair.com kyle.levine@alaskaair.com
francis.heil@aa.com
Robert.wirick@aa.com
sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com
chris.walker@delta.com
dan.weiss@united.com Thomas.bolling@united.com steve.morrissey@united.com lhalloway@crowell.com gmurphy@crowell.com howard.kass@usairways.com benjamin.slocum@usairways.com marshall.sinick@squiresanders.com esta.rosenberg@dot.gov robert.finamore@dot.gov brett.kruger@dot.gov paul.gretch@dot.gov todd.homan@dot.gov john.s.duncan@faa.gov urskr@state.gov cristinasa@state.gov
info@airlineinfo.com

/s/
J. Parker Erkmann
Exhibit
32.1











CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
Section #1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (“Form 10-Q”) of Galaxy
Nutritional Foods, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2008
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I,
Michael E. Broll, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.











/s/ Michael E.
Broll


Michael
E. Broll


Chief
Executive Officer


November
14, 2008
No. 12-5161.

#### Nieto-Rojas *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.