alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial  statements of Reading & Bates Corporation for the year ended
December 31, 1996 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          59,089
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   65,620
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,891
<INVENTORY>                                     13,369
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               140,090
<PP&E>                                         954,249
<DEPRECIATION>                                 296,620
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 808,190
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           55,132
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,594
<OTHER-SE>                                     443,013
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   808,190
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               290,223
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  126,708
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   605
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,781
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 92,484
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,884
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             77,916
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    77,916
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.10
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.6

[RYDER SCOTT COMPANY LETTERHEAD]

                      CONSENT OF RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.

     As independent petroleum consultants, Ryder Scott Company, L.P. hereby
consents to the incorporation by reference in this Amendment No. 1 to the
Registration Statement on Form S-4, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on or about March 25, 2003, of information from our reserve reports
for Plains Exploration and Production Company and Affiliates as of December 31,
2002, December 31, 2001, December 31, 2000 and December 31, 1999. We further
consent to references to our firm under the subsection Experts and in the
Agreement and Plan of Merger dated February 2, 2003 in regards to reserve
reporting as of December 31, 2002.


                                        /s/ Ryder Scott Company, L.P.
                                        ---------------------------------
                                        RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.

Houston, Texas
March 25, 2003
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Vijay B. Samant, the Chief Executive Officer of Vical Incorporated (the Company), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the
Periodic Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by
the Periodic Report and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Periodic Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated:
November 6, 2009



|                                       
|---------------------------------------
|/s/ VIJAY B. SAMANT                    
|Vijay B. Samant Chief
Executive Officer

THIS CERTIFICATION ACCOMPANIES THE FORM 10-Q TO WHICH IT RELATES, IS NOT DEEMED FILED
WITH THE SEC AND IS NOT TO BE INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO ANY FILING OF THE COMPANY UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, OR THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED (WHETHER MADE BEFORE OR AFTER THE DATE OF THE FORM 10-Q),
IRRESPECTIVE OF ANY GENERAL INCORPORATION LANGUAGE CONTAINED IN SUCH FILING. A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS CERTIFICATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE COMPANY AND WILL BE RETAINED BY THE COMPANY AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR
ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
EXHIBIT 10.42


             Summary - Executive Severance Package

Purpose:  To provide reduction- in- force benefits for
          certain key employees from January 1997
          through June 1998

                    
Requirements:       - Employees must fulfill service and
                      performance stipulations through designated
                      termination date
                    
                                        
Severance Payment   Tiers               Amounts
                                        
                    Tier I - Office of  18 months base salary
                    the Chief           plus 1997 termination
                    Executive           allowance package
                                        
                    Tier II - all       12 months base salary
                    other officers of   plus 1997 termination
                    Reynolds Metals     allowance package
                    Company
                                        
                    Tier  III - other   6 months base salary
                    key employees       plus 1997 termination
                                        allowance package
                                        
                                        
Outplacement        Full individualized outplacement services
                    until individual is successfully placed.
                                        
                    
Incentive           If the employee works at least six months
                    during the incentive year, then a pro-rata
                    award based on performance and number of
                    months worked during incentive year will be
                    made.
                                        
                    
Release             Employees must sign a release to be
Requirement         eligible for benefits under this policy.
                    

Note:  "Officer" does not include assistant officers.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 977 

To require the Corps of Engineers to notify affected communities before 

releasing water contaminated with cyanobacteria from flood risk management projects, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 5, 2019 

Mr. MAST introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To require the Corps of Engineers to notify affected communities before releasing water contaminated with 

cyanobacteria from flood risk management projects, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Toxic Health Threat 

5 Warning Act of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 977 IH

1 SEC. 2. RELEASES OF WATER CONTAMINATED WITH CY2 ANOBACTERIA. 

3 (a) DETERMINATION.—Before releasing water from 

4 a flood risk management project, the Secretary shall deter5 mine whether the water is contaminated with cyanobacte6 ria, based on tests conducted by the Secretary, another 

7 Federal agency, or the State in which the flood risk man8 agement project is located. 

9 (b) NOTIFICATION.—If the Secretary determines 

10 under subsection (a) that water to be released from a flood 

11 risk management project is contaminated with cyanobacte12 ria, the Secretary shall notify the public and affected gov13 ernments of the contamination and planned release, and 

14 any potential effects on human health, before releasing the 

15 water. 

16 (c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

17 (1) AFFECTED GOVERNMENT.—The term ‘‘af18 fected government’’ means a State, local, or Tribal 

19 government with jurisdiction over an area that will 

20 be affected by a release of water from a flood risk 

21 management project. 

22 (2) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

23 the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief 

24 of Engineers. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Adams, Kevin (OST) From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Bill Van <billv@aaghi.com> Monday, May 27, 2013 3:23 PM Adams, Kevin (OST) Dennis.Adams@dot.gov Air travel from Kamuela to Honolulu -' . '

- , __ :.

.-..·-. .-**~** ' ··, ; .:.....,.. 

### I am a residence of Kamuela and itwould be a ofgreat convenience for me to be able to travel on a daily bases. I have my cooperate offices in Honolulu and would love to spend moretime in Kamuela. I also like the services that Schuman aviation provides I have used them in the past. They are a reliable companywith great integrity. I used Pacific Wings in the past and there services were horrible. From the front deskto the pilots no customer service whatsoever. I sincerely hope we getthis service back itwould do a lotfor me and myfamily. Bill van den Hurk Aloha Auto Group I President I billv@aaghi.com 

# LOH

I All Islands I Oahu I Maui I Big Island I Kauai I 

## YAMAHA Office: (808) 792-8909 I Fax: (808) 833-3444 I Mobile: (808) 864-6649 2841 N Nimitz Hwy. I Honolulu, HI 96719 Iwww.aaghi.com is onivthe intended recipient otthe transmission, and may contain by return email and delete messag"" and ofit from your

1 your·
# C_2022451EN.01001402.xml

| 28.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 451/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 451/14

---

Order of the General Court of 12 September 2022 — Biologische Heilmittel Heel v EUIPO — Esi (TRAUMGEL)

(Case T-130/22) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark TRAUMGEL - Earlier EU word mark Traumeel - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - No similarity of the goods - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2022/C 451/17)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Biologische Heilmittel Heel GmbH (Baden-Baden, Germany) (represented by: J. Künzel, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Ringelhann and J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Esi Srl (Albisola Superiore, Italy)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the partial annulment and partial alteration of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 20 December 2021 (Case R 813/2021-4).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law.

| 2. | Biologische Heilmittel Heel GmbH shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Biologische Heilmittel Heel GmbH shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 171, 25.4.2022.

---
#### Keerut SINGH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 17-35571

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted February 13, 2018 *

Filed February 23, 2018

Keerut Singh, Pro Se

Trida Boerger, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Helen J. Brunner, Esquire, Assistant U.S. Attorney, DOJ-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Seattle, WA, Seattle, WA, for Defendant-Appellee

Before: LEAVY, FERNANDEZ, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Singh's request for oral argument, set forth in his opening brief, is denied.

MEMORANDUM **

Keerut Singh appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in his Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) and Privacy Act action arising out of requests for records relating to his employment and associated investigations and background checks. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. *Animal Legal Def. Fund v. U.S. Food & Drug Admin.,*836 F.3d 987, 990 (9th Cir. 2016) (en banc) (summary judgment in FOIA cases); *Louis v. Dep’t of Labor,*419 F.3d 970, 973 (9th Cir. 2005) (summary judgment in Privacy Act cases). We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Singh failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether the United States Postal Service had not conducted an adequate search for responsive documents. *See*5 U.S.C. § 552a(b) (conditions of disclosure under the Privacy Act); *Hamdan v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice,*797 F.3d 759, 770-71 (9th Cir. 2015) (setting forth requirements for demonstrating adequacy of search for documents under FOIA); *Lane v. Dep’t of Interior,*523 F.3d 1128, 1139 (9th Cir. 2008) (adequacy of search for documents under the Privacy Act), *overruled in part on other grounds by Animal Legal Def. Fund,*836 F.3d at 990.

Because Singh submitted arguments in his opposition to defendant’s motion for summary judgment, the district court did not err by denying Singh’s request for oral argument. *See*Fed. R. Civ. P. 78 (district court may decide motions without oral argument); *Partridge v. Reich,*141 F.3d 920, 926 (9th Cir. 1998) (litigants cannot demonstrate prejudice for denial of oral argument where they had an adequate opportunity to submit evidence and argument on the papers in opposition to summary judgment).

We reject as unsupported by the record Singh’s contention that the district judge and U.S. Attorney’s Office engaged in misconduct.

*662All pending requests are denied.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000818675
<NAME> EVANS ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                         161,371
<SECURITIES>                                   500,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,792,139
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    546,506
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,789,421
<PP&E>                                         812,422
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,155,504
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,348,066
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        49,806
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        171
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,752,447
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,155,504
<SALES>                                      5,901,614
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,901,614
<CGS>                                        3,553,336
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,051,149
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              89,148
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (238,725)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (238,725)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (151,766)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (390,491)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1


                        CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 302


I, Guy L. Mayer certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q/A of Tutogen Medical, Inc.;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

         4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         b) [reserved] / [paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238
and 34-47986];

         c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and
         5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

         a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

<PAGE>

         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: July 6, 2006



/s/ Guy L. Mayer
------------------------------
Guy L. Mayer
Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| Date:                May 12, 2006 | By:    | /s/    Anthony                B. Waters |   |
|-----------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                              |   | Name:                Anthony B. Waters                      |
|                              |   | Title:                Chief Financial Officer               |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          23,419
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  124,263
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,501
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       2,369,595
<DEPRECIATION>                                 637,340
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,999,246
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      1,273,550
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        57,980
<OTHER-SE>                                     337,383
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,999,246
<SALES>                                        720,291
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               720,291
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  518,928
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              83,633
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                134,037
<INCOME-TAX>                                    52,140
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             81,897
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    81,897
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.41


</TABLE>
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

Aug ust 13, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00302

- CR

Nicanor C. SANCHEZ

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CR7395

Honorable Catherine Torres

- Stahl, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant’s motion for extension of time is GRANTED. Appellant’s brief is due

September 10, 2018. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS WILL BE GRANTED.

_________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 13th day of August, 2018

.

___________________________________ K eith E. H ottle

Clerk of Court