alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
___________ No. 95-3331

___________ John James Jackson, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * District of Minnesota. * United States of America, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: June 7, 1996 Filed: June 25, 1996

___________ Before BEAM, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. John James Jackson appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate his sentence. We remand for further proceedings. A jury convicted Jackson of bank robbery. At sentencing, the district court denied Jackson's request for a downward departure, and sentenced him as a career offender to a term of 300 months imprisonment. We affirmed his conviction. United States v. Jackson , 41 F.3d 1231, 1234 (8th Cir. 1994) (per curiam). On April 20, 1995, Jackson filed a motion for sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (sentence may be reducedafter sentencing when United States Sentencing Commission subsequently

reduces sentencing range), arguing that he received ineffective assistance of counsel at sentencing. On June 7, 1995, Jackson filed a separate section 2255 motion, arguing his conviction was obtained in violation of due process; the court failed to instruct the jury about his mental illness; and he received ineffective assistance of counsel. Both motions were filed in the criminal case; the section 2255 motion was also given a civil case number. Jackson also moved to consolidate this motion with his section 3582 motion to reduce his sentence. On June 30, 1995, the district court denied Jackson's section 3582(c) motion to reduce his sentence, and concluded that, even construed as a motion under section 2255, the claims were without merit. On July 24, 1995, Jackson filed a "Motion for Notice of Inquiry" concerning the status of his June 7 section 2255 motion. On August 22, 1995, the district court indicated it had denied both the section 3582 and section 2255 motions on June 30, and it denied Jackson's motion as moot. Jackson filed his notice of appeal on September 6, 1995, appealing the denial of his "28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion with a final ORDER on August 22, 1995." First, we conclude we lack jurisdiction over the district court's June 30 order denying Jackson's section 3582(c) motion because Jackson's September 6 notice of appeal was untimely. We further conclude that the district court erred in denying as moot Jackson's motion of notice of inquiry. In that motion, Jackson inquired as to the status of his section 2255 motion, and the district court mistakenly concluded that it had addressed the section 2255 motion. Because the district court had not yet addressed the issues Jackson raised in his separate section 2255 motion, we remand for consideration of the claims raised therein.We deny Jackson's motion for an entry of default.
A true copy.

Attest:
CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 11.0


                              NATIONAL REALTY, L.P.
                         A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
                        Computation of Earnings Per Unit


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                For the Three Months           For the Six Months
                                                   Ended June 30,                Ended June 30,
                                              -------------------------     -------------------------
                                                 1998           1997           1998           1997
                                              ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------
                                                      (dollars in thousands, except per unit)
<S>                                           <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>       
Net income ..............................     $   22,141     $    3,321     $   22,649     $    3,074

   Less - General Partners'
      1.99% Interest ....................            441             66            451             61
                                              ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------

Net income allocable to
   Limited Partner ......................     $   21,700     $    3,255     $   22,198     $    3,013
                                              ==========     ==========     ==========     ==========


Earnings Per Unit

   Net income ...........................     $     3.43     $      .51     $     3.51     $      .48
                                              ==========     ==========     ==========     ==========


Weighted average units of
   limited partner interest
   used in computing earnings
   per unit .............................      6,322,531      6,329,076      6,322,984      6,328,639
                                              ==========     ==========     ==========     ==========
</TABLE>




                                       30
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          17,637
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   73,291
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,126
<INVENTORY>                                      8,659
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               121,043
<PP&E>                                       1,546,115
<DEPRECIATION>                                 493,460
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,191,791
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           62,403
<BONDS>                                        671,822
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        41,067
<OTHER-SE>                                     247,607
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,191,791
<SALES>                                        556,704
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               556,704
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  398,996
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              49,270
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 70,211
<INCOME-TAX>                                    27,417
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             42,794
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    42,794
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .68<F1>
<FN>
<F1>EPS-Primary and EPS-Diluted have been restated to reflect the effects of 
           the three-for-two common stock split distributed on March 16, 1998
           and the application of Financial Accounting Standard No. 128, 
           "Earnings Per Share."
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

GARY VANN

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. '

'

'

'

'

' No. 08

- 1 3

- 00 104

- CR

Appeal from the

3 62 nd District Court

of Denton County, Texas

(TC# F

- 2011

- 1477

- D )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant ’ s third motion for extension of time to file the brief

until September 30

, 2013

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE

THE APPELLANT ’ S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. David Wacker

, the Appellant ’ s Attorney , prepare

the Appellant ’ s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before September 30, 201 3

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 2 5 th day of September

, 201 3

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera and Rodriguez, JJ.
# C_2022359EN.01002601.xml

| 19.9.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 359/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.9.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 359/26

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Hamm (Germany) lodged on 1 June 2022 — Criminal proceedings against A.

(Case C-352/22)

(2022/C 359/28)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberlandesgericht Hamm

Parties to the main proceedings:

Requested person: A.

Applicant: Generalstaatsanwaltschaft Hamm

Questions referred

Must Article 9(2) and (3) of Directive 2013/32/EU, (1) in conjunction with Article 21(1) of Directive 2011/95/EU, (2) be interpreted as meaning that the final recognition of a person as a refugee within the meaning of the Geneva Convention on Refugees in another Member State of the European Union is binding for the purposes of the extradition procedure in the Member State requested to extradite such a person on account of the obligation under EU law to interpret national law in conformity with the directives (third paragraph of Article 288 TFEU and Article 4(3) TEU), that is to say, is binding in such a way that extradition of the person to the third country or country of origin is thereby necessarily precluded until his or her recognition as a refugee has been revoked or has expired?

---

(1)  Directive 2013/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection (OJ 2013 L 180, p. 60).

(2)  Directive 2011/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on standards for the qualification of third-country nationals or stateless persons as beneficiaries of international protection, for a uniform status for refugees or for persons eligible for subsidiary protection, and for the content of the protection granted (recast) (OJ 2011 L 337, p. 9).

---
AVS

Quality Management

System

Title: Domestic New Action Worksheet with 58

QPM#

AIR-ANM-ll30-F7

Date: December 17, 2008

Revision

1

Record of Contacts

d 01 D- oLj<iJb

FDMS Docket No. FAA-Wi} - _

With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed (e.g., ATA, RAA, ALPA, etc.)?

Organization Person Contacted Date

Boeing J.B. Zundel! (FAA letter 1405-10-16) Janual')' 21,2010

UNCONTROLLED COPY WHEN DOWNLOADED

Check the Master List to Verify That This is the Correct Revision Before Use
Home > Petroleum > Navigato r Energy Glossary

View History: Monthly Annual Download Data (XLS File)



### U.S. Imports of Fuel Ethanol(Thousand Barrels per Day) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1993 1 2 21 1 2 0 1994 2 1 12 2 2 1995 1 0 2 1 1 22 1 0 0 2 1 1996 1 1 2 1 1 00 2 2 0 0 2 1997 0 0 2 0 0 10 0 0 1 0 0 1998 0 0 1 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 1999 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 2000 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 2001 1 3 1 0 2 01 2 1 0 0 1 2002 2 1 1 0 0 00 0 0 0 4 0 2003 2 0 0 2 0 00 0 0 0 3 0 2004 4 5 5 6 18 11 22 13 17 12 0 3 2005 13 0 7 3 7 3 6 2 22 23 19 2006 4 22 29 30 22 52 85 100 76 66 46 39 2007 35 36 23 24 21 31 49 51 20 32 13 7 2008 16 17 12 50 31 52 47 62 82 20 9 15 2009 12 2 3 6 16 23 33 30 10 7 10 0 2010 1111

- = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 6/29/2010 Next Release Date: Last Week of July 2010 Referring Pages:

 Fuel Ethanol (Renewable) Imports from All Countries
 Fuel Ethanol Imports by Area of Entry
 Fuel Ethanol Supply and Disposition

Privacy/Security | Accessibility | Copyright & Reuse · Contact Us | Feedback | Careers | About EIA Fedstats | USA.gov | Dept. of Energy 

## Page 1 of 1 U.S. Imports of Fuel Ethanol(Thousand Barrels per Day)

7/8/2010 http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafH andler.ashx?n=PET&s=MFEIMUS2&f=M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> UT
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      193,633
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                          0
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          19,603
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        15,378
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 228,614
<COMMON>                                         1,244
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       37,590
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             42,807
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                  81,641
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      4,800
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                            78,021
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                               9,720
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                    3,050
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                  51,382
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  228,614
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      184,026
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             4,342
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     164,036
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     168,378
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         15,648
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 584
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  16,232
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         7,473
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,759
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        487
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                    8,272
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         4,776
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        6,362
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          41,426
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     6.65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     6.65
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 46 (Monday, March 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 10855]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6012]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Pursuant to the provisions of the ``Government in the Sunshine 
Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit 
Insurance Corporation's Board of Directors will meet in open session at 
10:00 a.m. on Tuesday, March 11, 1997, to consider the following 
matters:

Discussion Agenda

Memorandum and resolution re: Proposed Final Rule on Government 
Securities Sales Practices, 12 CFR Part 368.

    The meeting will be held in the Board Room on the sixth floor of 
the FDIC Building located at 550--17th Street, NW., Washington, DC.
    The FDIC will provide attendees with auxiliary aids (e.g., sign 
language interpretation) required for this meeting. Those attendees 
needing such assistance should call (202) 416-2449 (Voice); (202) 416-
2004 (TTY), to make necessary arrangements.
    Requests for further information concerning the meeting may be 
directed to Mr. Jerry L. Langley, Executive Secretary of the 
Corporation, at (202) 898-6757.

    Dated: March 6, 1997.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Jerry L. Langley,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-6012 Filed 3-6-97; 12:34 pm]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-M
**Exhibit
      23.1**








**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**





We
      have
      issued our reports dated December 8, 2006, accompanying the consolidated
      financial statements and schedules and management's assessment of the
      effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the
      Annual Report of Resource America, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended September
      30, 2006. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports
      in
      the Registration Statement of Resource America, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No.
      333126344, effective July 1, 2005, File No. 333105615, effective May 28, 2003,
      File Nos. 33398505 and 33398507, effective August 22, 2002, File No. 33381420,
      effective January 25, 2002 and File No. 33337416, effective May 19,
      2000).





/s/
      GRANT
      THORNTON LLP





Cleveland,
      Ohio


December
      8, 2006
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ROBERT MAYS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 217 EAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ROBERT MAYS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 218 EAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 30th day of December, 2021

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
No. 12-2.

#### Government of Belize *v.*Belize Social Development Ltd.

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8905 

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to reduce the threat 

of counterfeit drugs to the pharmaceutical supply chain, and to make 

the pharmaceutical supply chain more robust, while ensuring the authenticity, content, purity, and manufacturing location and batch number 

of drugs (including COVID–19 therapeutics and vaccines) and allowing 

patient verification of authenticity, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 8, 2020 

Mr. VAN DREW introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to 

reduce the threat of counterfeit drugs to the pharmaceutical supply chain, and to make the pharmaceutical 

supply chain more robust, while ensuring the authenticity, content, purity, and manufacturing location and 

batch number of drugs (including COVID–19 therapeutics and vaccines) and allowing patient verification 

of authenticity, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8905 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Supply Chain Security 

3 and Pharmaceutical Authentication Act of 2020’’. 

4 SEC. 2. PACKAGES SUBJECT TO PHARMACEUTICAL DIS5 TRIBUTION SUPPLY CHAIN REQUIREMENTS. 

6 Subparagraph (B) of section 581(11) of the Federal 

7 Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 360eee(11)) is 

8 amended to read as follows: 

9 ‘‘(B) INDIVIDUAL SALEABLE UNIT.—For 

10 purposes of this paragraph, an ‘individual sale11 able unit’ is the smallest solid oral dosage form 

12 of product, or other individual solid oral dosage 

13 form of product, introduced into commerce by 

14 the manufacturer or repackager.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 52 (Tuesday, March 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 12857]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6809]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Working Group on Studying the Merits of Defined Contribution vs. 
Defined Benefit Plans, Advisory Council on Employee Welfare and Pension 
Benefits Plans; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to the authority contained in Section 512 of the Employee 
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. 1142, the 
Advisory Council on Employee Welfare and Pension Benefit Plans' new 
Working Group being established to Study the Merits of Defined 
Contributions vs. Defined Benefit Plans With an Emphasis on Small 
Business Concerns will hold a public meeting on April 8, 1997 in Room 
N-5437 A&B, U.S. Department of Labor Building, Second and Constitution 
Avenue, NW, Washington, D.C. 20210.
    The purpose of the open meeting, which will run from 9:30 a.m. to 
approximately noon, is for Working Group members to begin organizing 
the course of study for the year and, it is hoped, even to begin taking 
testimony on the topic.
    Members of the public are encouraged to file a written statement 
pertaining to any topic concerning ERISA by submitting 20 copies on or 
before April 1, 1997, to Sharon Morrissey, Executive Secretary, ERISA 
Advisory Council, U.S. Department of Labor, Room N-5677, 200 
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, D.C. 20210. Individuals or 
representatives of organizations wishing to address the Working Group 
on Studying the Merits of Defined Contribution vs. Defined Contribution 
Plans With an Emphasis on Small Business Concerns should forward their 
request to the Executive Secretary or telephone (202) 219-8753. Oral 
presentations will be limited to 10 minutes, but an extended statement 
may be submitted for the record. Individuals with disabilities, who 
need special accommodations, should contact Sharon Morrissey by April 
1, at the address indicated in this notice.
    Organizations or individuals may also submit statements for the 
record without testifying. Twenty (20) copies of such statements should 
be sent to the Executive Secretary of the Advisory Council at the above 
address. Papers will be accepted and included in the record of the 
meeting if received on or before April 1.

    Signed at Washington, D.C. this 12th day of March, 1997.
Olena Berg,
Assistant Secretary, Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration.
[FR Doc. 97-6809 Filed 3-17-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-29-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 8 (Monday, January 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 1780]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-675]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Gas Research Institute Through-Casing 
Resistivity Logging Research Consortium

    Notice is hereby given that, on December 9, 1996, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Gas Research Institute 
Through-Casing Resistivity Logging Research Consortium has filed 
written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the 
Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) The identities of the parties 
and (2) the nature and objectives of the venture. The notifications 
were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting 
the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances. Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of 
the parties are: Gas Research Institute, Chicago, IL; Conoco, Inc., 
Ponca City, OK; Texaco, Inc., Bellaire, TX; Phillips Petroleum Company, 
Bartlesville, OK; Mobil E&P U.S., Midland, TX; Chevron Petroleum 
Technology Company, La Habra, CA; BP Exploration Operating Company 
Limited, Middlesex TW167LN, United Kingdom; Shell E&P Technology 
Company, Houston, TX; and ARCO Exploration & Production, Plano, TX.
    The purpose of the Consortium is to fund a research project to 
develop interpretation techniqu4es for Through-Casing Resistivity 
Logging by testing the current research device, sponsoring laboratory 
or theoretical research or any other activity associated with Through-
Casing Resistivity.
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 97-675 Filed 1-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M