alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
የዩናይት ስቴት እኩል የሥራ ዕድል የማግኘት ኮሚሽን 

አድልዎን መከላከል መልካም ሥራ ነው 

አድልዎን መከላከል መልካም የሥራ ስሜት ያመጣል። ለሕግ ተገዢ መሆን የሠራተኛውን ምርታማነት፣ ሥራቸውን መውደድ፣ እና ለስነልቦናቸው 

ከፍ የሚያደርግ ሲሆን ለሙግት የሚወጣውን ወጪ ይቀንሳል። የአካል ጉዳት ያለባችውን ግለሰቦች በመቅጠርዎ ወይም ንግድዎን ለአካል ጉዳተኛ 

ግለሰቦች ዕድል በመስጠትዎ ለግብር ጥቅማ ጥቅም መብት ሊኖርዎት ይችላል! ለበለጠ መረጃ ይህን http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/

publications/adahandbook.cfm#appendixa ድኅረገጽ ይመልከቱ።

EEOC አነስተኛ የንግድ ባለቤቶችን ሊረዳ ይችላል። የEEOC ዘርን፣ የቆዳ ቀለምን፣ ሃይማኖትን፣ ጾታን፣ የትውልድ አገርን፣ የአካል ጉዳትን፣ ዕድሜን፣ 

እና የዘረግንድ መረጃን መሠረት በማድረግ የሚደረግ የሥራ አድልዎን የሚቃወመውን የፌዴራል ሕግን የሚያጠናክር የፌዴራል መንግሥት እጄንስ 

ነው። እነዚህ ሕጎች መድልዎን በመቃወም ወይም በማሳውቅ ወይም መድልዎን በመመርመር ወይም በሕጋው መንገድ በመጠየቅ ውስጥ 

በመሳተፊ የሚመጣውን ጥቃት (ቅጣት) ይከለክላል። 

እንዴት ሊንረዳ እንችላለን

▪ ተግባራዊ ስላደረግናቸው ሕጎች ያልዎትን ጥያቄዎች

መመለስ እንችላለን።

▪ ክብረነክን፣ መገለልን፣ እና ሌሎች ሕጋዊ ያልሆኑ የመድልዎ

ቅርጾችን እንዲከላከሉ እርስዎን ለመርዳት ሀሳቦችን ሊንሰጥ 

እንችላለን።

▪ ስለ ሥራ ቦታ መብቶች እና ኃላፊነቶች እርስዎን እና

ሠራተኞችዎን ማሰልጥን እንችላለን። 

▪ በሽምግልና የEEOC የመድልዎ ቅጣቶችን (ቅሬታዎችን)

በመፍታት ሊንረዳዎት እንችላለን። የEEOC ሽምግልና ከክፍያ 

ነጻ፣ መደበኛ ያልሆነ፣ ጊዜዎትን እና ገንዘብዎትን ሊያድን 

የሚችል ለሙግቶች መፍትሔ ለመስጠት ሚስጥራዊነቱ 

የተጠበቀ ሂደት ነው።

የእርስዎ ኃላፊነቶች 

▪ የሥራ ዕድል ውሳኔዎች በዘር፣ በቆዳ ቀለም፣ በሃይማኖት፣ በጾታ፣

በትውልድ አገር ፣ በአካል ጉዳት፣ በዕድሜ፣ ወይም በዘረግንድ መረጃ 

ላይ መሠረት አለማድረጉን ማረጋገጥ።

▪ የሥራ መመሪያዎች እና ተግባራት ከሥራ ጋር የተያያዙ መሆናቸውን

እና የተወሰኑ ሰዎችን በዘር፣ በቆዳ ቀለም፣ በሃይማኖት፣ በጾታ፣ 

በትውልድ አገር፣ በካል ጉዳንት፣ ወይም በዕድሜ ምክንያት ያለአግባቢ 

እንዳያገላቸው ማረጋገጥ። 

▪ ሠራተኞች ከዘራቸው፣ ከቆዳ ቀለማቸው፣ ከሃይማኖታቸው፣

ከጾታቸው፣ ከትውልድ አገራቸው፣ ከአካል ጉዳተኝነታቸው፣ 

ከዕድሜአቸው፣ ወይም ከዘረግንድ መረጃቸው የተነሳ ክብራቸው 

የማይነካ መሆኑን ማረጋገጥ።

▪ ሕግን መሠረት ባደረገ መልኩ የክፍያ ልዩነት ካላሳመኑ በስተቀስ፣

ተመሳሳይ ሥራ ለሚሠሩ ለወንድ እና ለሴት ሠራተኞች እኩል የሆነ 

ክፍያ መፈጸም።

▪ መድልዎ እንደደረሰባቸው ቅሬታ ለሚያቀርቡት በፍጥነት እና ተገቢ

በሆነ ሁኔታ ምላሽ መስጠት። ክብረነክን እና መድልዎን ማስቆም፣ 

መፍትሔ መስጠት፣ እና መከላከል። ሠራተኞች ቅሬታ ስላቀረቡ 

አለመቀጣታቸውን ማረጋገጥ።

▪ ተገቢ የሆነ ለሥራ የሚመሆኑ ነገሮችን ( በሥራ ቦታ ላይ ነገሮች

በተለምዶ ከሚሰሩበት ቦታ ላይ ለውጦችን ማምጣት፣ ማለትም እንደ 

ሠራተኛው ከሃኪሙ ጋር ያለውን ቀጠሮ መከታተል እንዲችል ወይም 

ሃይማኖታዊ የበዓል ቀኖችን እንዲያከብር የቀጠሮ ለውጦችን 

መፍቀድ) በሕግ የሚጠየቅ ከሆነ፣ ለህክምና ወይም ለሃይማኖታዊ 

ምክንያቶች ለሚፈልጉ ለአመልካቾች እና ለሠራተኖች መስጠት።

▪ የፌደራል የሠራተኞች መድልዎን የሚከላከሉ ሕጎችን የሚገልጸውን

ፖስተር መለጠፍ (አንዱን በነጻ ከዚህ http://www1.eeoc.gov/

employers/poster.cfm ድኅረገጽ ላይ ያውሩዱት)።

▪ በሕግ እንደተደነገገው የሠራተኛን መዝገቦች (ማለትም

ማመልከቻዎችን ወይም የሠራተኛው መዛግብቶችን) በአግባብ መያዝ

በፌዴራል፣ በግዛት፣ ወይም በአከባቢው ሕጎች ተጨማሪ ኃላፊነቶች 

ሊኖርዎት ይችላል።

ይደውሉልን! 

በአገሪቱ ውስጥ ያለ የEEOC ሠራተኞች እርስዎን ለመርዳት 

አሉ። አይዘግዩ፤ ዛሬውኑ ይደውሉልን! 

አስፈላጊ ከሆነ፣ ከክፍያ ነጻ የሆነ የቋንቋ እርዳታ የሚሰጡ 

ይገኛሉ፤ 

▪ ስለ የEEOC መረጃ ወይም ስልጠና ይፈልጋሉ?

በአካባቢዎ የሚገኝ የአነስተኛ ሥራዎ የ EEOC ላይሰን በዚህ

(http://www.eeoc.gov/employers/

contacts.cfm) ድኅረገጽ ላይ ያግኙ ወይም በ 1-800-

669-4000 (TTY: 1-800-669-6820) ይደውሉልን።

▪ የግድ ስለሚንላቸው ሕጎች መረጃ ይፈልጋሉ?

በ(202) 663-4691 ላይ ይደውሉልን ወይም።

▪ በሥራዎ ላይ ስለመጣው ስለ EEOC የመድልዎ ቅጣት 

ጥያቄዎች አልዎት? 

ለእርስዎ ክስ የተመደበውን የEEOC መርማሪ ያግኙ።

ከእርስዎ ለመስማት እንጠባበቃለን! 

ለበለጠ መረጃ፣ የአከባቢዎን የአነስተኛ ሥራዎች EEOCን ሊይሰንን በ (http://www.eeoc.gov/employers/contacts.cfm) ያግኙ።
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. JONATHAN MCDONOUGH, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 358 WAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 21st day of January, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
Exhibit 31.1  I, Dempsey Mork, certify that:  1.           I have reviewed this quarterly report for the period ended Sept. 30, 2007 on Form 10-Q of Knickerbocker Capital Corp.;  2.           Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.           Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.           The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a)           Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b)           Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c)           Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.           The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)           All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b)           Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  Nov. 19, 2009  /s/ Dempsey Mork Dempsey Mork Chief Executive Officer
No. 11-10959.

#### Wilson v. Ohio.

Ct. App. Ohio, Montgomery County. Certiorari denied.
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

** The Honorable J. Thomas Marten, District Judge, United States District

Court for the District of Kansas, sitting by designation.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

NOV 17 1997

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

ROBERT M. WATKINS,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

STEVE HARGETT; ATTORNEY

GENERAL OF THE STATE OF

OKLAHOMA,

Respondents-Appellees.

No. 97-7025

(D.C. No. 95-CV-560-S)

(E.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before PORFILIO and LUCERO, Circuit Judges, and MARTEN,** District Judge.

Petitioner seeks review of the district court’s order dismissing his third

petition for habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 on the grounds that the filing

constituted an abuse of the writ. See McCleskey v. Zant, 499 U.S. 467, 493-95
1 Because petitioner filed his habeas petition in 1995, before enactment of

the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA), Pub. L. No.

104-132, 110 Stat.1214, AEDPA’s certificate of appealability requirements do not

apply to this appeal. See United States v. Kunzman, No. 96-1310, 1997 WL

602507, at *1 n.2 (10th Cir. Oct. 1, 1997) (to be reported at 125 F.3d 1363). 

Instead, the pre-AEDPA certificate of probable cause requirements apply here. 

Regardless of the label we attach to the requirements, petitioner’s substantive

burden is the same, see Lennox v. Evans, 87 F.3d 431, 434 (10th Cir. 1996), cert.

denied, 117 S. Ct. 746 (1997), overruled in part by Kunzman, 1997 WL 602507 at

*1 n.2, so we will construe his application for a certificate of appealability as an

application for a certificate of probable cause.

-2-

(1991) (holding that a second or subsequent writ is subject to dismissal unless

petitioner shows cause for the failure to assert claims in first petition and

prejudice resulting from the claimed errors, or a fundamental miscarriage of

justice).

Before petitioner can proceed on appeal, he must secure a certificate of

probable cause from this court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253.1 Based upon our

review of the record as a whole, we conclude that the petitioner has failed to

make a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right.

We, therefore, DENY the application for a certificate of probable cause,

and DISMISS the appeal. Petitioner’s motion for release pending appeal is 
-3-

DENIED as moot. All other pending motions are DENIED.

The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Entered for the Court

Carlos F. Lucero

Circuit Judge
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-05-1998
<CASH>                                          19,567
<SECURITIES>                                     2,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,752
<ALLOWANCES>                                       337
<INVENTORY>                                      8,654
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                48,923
<PP&E>                                          22,336
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,013
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  67,927
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,476
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            59
<OTHER-SE>                                      42,392
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    67,927
<SALES>                                         38,949
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                38,949
<CGS>                                           19,659
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   38,481
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    85
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 727
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (259)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        40
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (219)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (219)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.04)
        


</TABLE>
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

JASON TROY LANE, 

Appellant, 

v.

Case No. 5D21-1198

LT Case No. 2020-00902-CF-54

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

 Appellee. 

________________________________/ 

Decision filed May 17, 2022

Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Putnam County, 

Howard O. McGillin, Jr., Judge. 

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and 

Joseph Chloupek, Assistant Public 

Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Kristen L. Davenport, 

Assistant Attorney General, Daytona 

Beach, for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM. 

AFFIRMED. 

EDWARDS, NARDELLA and WOZNIAK, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   5-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1995
<CASH>                                       6,224,243
<SECURITIES>                                 3,006,468
<RECEIVABLES>                               73,297,630
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 11,687,930
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            95,071,546
<PP&E>                                       9,530,665
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             117,795,598
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       28,718,617
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     24,375
<COMMON>                                        23,465
<OTHER-SE>                                  71,586,278
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               117,795,598
<SALES>                                    128,369,233
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           128,369,233
<CGS>                                      109,592,646
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,247,850
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               154,498
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             901,878
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             10,472,361
<INCOME-TAX>                                   204,688
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         10,267,675
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 9,952,551
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
COME, MY FRIENDS,

‘TIS NOT TOO LATE TO SEEK A NEWER 

WORLD.
Sustainability Metrics in 

North Carolina State Government

Presentation to NACEPT

William G. Ross, Jr.

August 2, 2012
Green Square

The Nature Research Center and DENR Headquarters
Environmental Features

• Energy recovery systems, 

energy star equipment, low 

VOC paint, insulated walls, 

low E windows that reflect 

heat from the sun. 

• Roof top solar panels

• Green roof with rainwater 

collection system.

• Pursuing LEED Gold status

• Recycled materials including 

wood derived from trees cut 

down on site

• Natural light complements an 

extensive LED lighting 

system
The Environmental Stewardship Initiative
ESI – By the Numbers

2010 ESI Members Reported Reductions:

• Air Emissions – 46 Tons

• Energy – 598,591 mmBtu

• Water Use – 41,895,325 Gallons

• Landfill Waste Disposal – 10,245 Tons

TOTAL Cost Savings: $3,270,504
ESI Measures Reductions and Savings

• Air Emissions

• Greenhouse Gas 

Emissions

• Hazardous Waste

• Landfill Waste 

Disposal

• Energy

• Water Use

• Wastewater 

Pollutants

• Wastewater Volume 

Reduction

• Biomass Recovery

• Total Recycled 

Volume

• Total Cost Savings
Clean Smokestacks
Southeastern Regional Partnership for 

Planning and Sustainability
SERPPAS

• Progress Toward Mutual And Multiple Goals On A Project

By Project Basis

• Example – Longleaf Pine Restoration
For more information

• NC DENR: portal.ncdenr.gov

• Nature Research Center: naturalsciences.org/natureresearch-center

• ESI: portal.ncdenr.org/web/deao/outreach/esi

• NC Division of Air Quality: daq.state.nc.us

• SERPPAS: serppas.org
[PNM Resources, Inc. logo]

 

**EXHIBIT 32.1**

** **

** **

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO § 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-Kfor the year ended December 31, 2004, for each of PNM Resources, Inc.and Public Service Company of New Mexico ("Companies"), as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on March 1, 2005 ("Report"), I, JeffryE. Sterba, Chief Executive Officer of the Companies, certify pursuant to 18U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

(1)     the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended; and

(2)     the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Companies.

 
| Date:   March 1, 2005 | By: | /s/ Jeffry E. Sterba    |
|---------------------------------|-----|-------------------------|
|                                 |     | Jeffry E. Sterba        |
|                                 |     | Chairman, President and |
|                                 |     | Chief Executive Officer |
# C_2023179EN.01004801.xml

| 22.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/48

---

Order of the General Court of 30 March 2023 — ATPN v Commission

(Case T-567/22) (1)

(Action for annulment - Environment - Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1214 - Nuclear energy - Sustainable activity - Association - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility)

(2023/C 179/71)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Association Trinationale de Protection Nucléaire (ATPN) (Basel, Switzerland) (represented by: C. Lepage, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. von Rintelen, A. Nijenhuis and C. Auvret, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1214 of 9 March 2022 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2139 as regards economic activities in certain energy sectors and Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2178 as regards specific public disclosures for those economic activities (OJ 2022 L 188, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | There is no longer any need to rule on the application to intervene lodged by the French Republic. |
| --- | --- |

2.

There is no longer any need to rule on the application to intervene lodged by the French Republic.

| 3. | The applicant shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The applicant shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

| 4. | The French Republic shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The French Republic shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 418, 31.10.2022.

---
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-0 6 -00 616-CV In re Roge r Wallace He nderson ORIG IN A L PR OC E E D IN GFR OM BA S T R OP C OU N T Y M E M O R

A N D UM O P I N I O N Roge r Wallace Hende rson see ks a writ o f m andamus dire ctingthe 335th District Court of Ba strop County

to act on his e x punction petition. The Court is informed that the petition was denied on August 4, 2006. The petition f or writ of mandamus is denied. SeeTe x. R. A pp . P. 52.8(a) .

__________________________________________ Be a Ann Smith, J ustice Be fore J ustices B . A. Smith, P ember ton and Waldrop Filed: Nove mber 3, 2006
# C_2022198EN.01005701.xml

| 16.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 198/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 198/57

---

Action brought on 18 March 2022 — Pinar Kuruyemiş Gida Ve Ihtiyaç Maddeleri Sanayi Ticaret v EUIPO — Yadex International (pinar KURUYEMIŞ)

(Case T-147/22)

(2022/C 198/82)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Pinar Kuruyemiş Gida Ve Ihtiyaç Maddeleri Sanayi Ticaret AŞ (Karatay/Konya, Turkey) (represented by: M. López Camba and A. Lyubomirova Geleva, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Yadex International GmbH (Frankfurt am Main, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark pinar KURUYEMIŞ — Application for registration No 18 160 742

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 January 2022 in Case R 1148/2021-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision to the extent that it maintains the upholding of opposition B 3110022; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision to the extent that it maintains the upholding of opposition B 3110022;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs incurred by the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs incurred by the applicant;

| — | order Yadex International GmbH to pay the costs incurred by the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

order Yadex International GmbH to pay the costs incurred by the applicant.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 94 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 94 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 71(1) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 71(1) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625;

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 874 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 874

  To amend title 28, United States Code, to prohibit the exclusion of 
    individuals from service on a Federal jury on account of sexual 
                    orientation or gender identity.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 30, 2019

   Mrs. Davis of California (for herself, Mr. Zeldin, Mr. Pocan, Mr. 
  Fitzpatrick, Ms. Norton, Ms. Speier, Mr. Grijalva, Mr. Quigley, Mr. 
 Swalwell of California, Mr. Lowenthal, and Mr. Katko) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 28, United States Code, to prohibit the exclusion of 
    individuals from service on a Federal jury on account of sexual 
                    orientation or gender identity.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Juror Non-Discrimination Act of 
2019''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FROM FEDERAL JURIES ON ACCOUNT OF SEXUAL ORIENTATION 
              OR GENDER IDENTITY PROHIBITED.

    Section 1862 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting ``(including sexual orientation and gender identity)'' after 
``sex''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 11-10807.

#### Lee *v.*Cully, Superintendent, Collins Correctional Facility.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.