alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000818257
<NAME> JOHN HANCOCK REALTY INCOME FUND-II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       3,581,889
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  154,215
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,436,104
<PP&E>                                      19,258,208
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,230,562
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              28,764,050
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          451,423
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  28,312,627
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                28,764,050
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,498,065
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  496,582
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               525,342
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,476,141
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,476,141
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,476,141
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.56
        

</TABLE>
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 22

- 51108 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus **Benjamin Wilson,** Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:00

- CR

- 13

- 1

**_______________________ _______**  Before **Higginbotham, Graves,** and **Ho,** Circuit Judges. **Per Curiam :**  *****
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Benjamin “Benji” Wilson has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Wilson has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the re levant portions of the record

**_____________________**

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir**

**. R** 

**.** 47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 13, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 22-51108 Document: 00516784918 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/13/2023No. 22

- 51108

2 reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further resp onsibilities herein, and the appeal is **DISMISSED**

. See **5th Cir. R.**  42.2

. Case: 22-51108 Document: 00516784918 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/13/2023
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 47 (Tuesday, March 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 11231]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5997]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards; Revised Meeting Agenda

    The agenda for the 439th meeting of the Advisory Committee on 
Reactor Safeguards scheduled to be held on March 6-8, 1997, in 
Conference Room T-2B3, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland, has 
been revised to include Committee discussion of a proposed ACRS report 
on plant specific application of safety goals. All other items 
pertaining to this meeting remain the same as published in the Federal 
Register on Thursday, February 20, 1997 (62 FR 7810).
    Further information regarding topics to be discussed, whether the 
meeting has been cancelled or rescheduled, the Chairman's ruling on 
requests for the opportunity to present oral statements and the time 
allotted therefor can be obtained by contacting Mr. Sam Duraiswamy, 
Chief, Nuclear Reactors Branch (telephone 301/415-7364), between 7:30 
A.M. and 4:15 P.M. EST.

    Dated: March 5, 1997.
Andrew L. Bates,
Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-5997 Filed 3-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 48 (Wednesday, March 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 11428]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6100]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP97-269-000]


Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Company; Notice of Tariff 
Filing

March 6, 1997.
    Take notice that on February 28, 1997, Williston Basin Interstate 
Pipeline Company (Williston Basin), tendered for filing to become part 
of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original Volume No. 2, certain revised tariff 
sheets listed on Appendix A to the filing, with an effective date of 
March 1, 1997.
    Williston Basin states that the revised tariff sheets are being 
filed pursuant to the Service Agreement applicable to Rate Schedule X-
13 service between Williston Basin and Northern States Power Company. 
The rate for firm transportation hereunder has been restated to reflect 
the second biennial restatement under the terms of the Service 
Agreement. The restated rate reflects a reservation charge of $17.16023 
per Mcf per month, excluding applicable surcharges.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-6100 Filed 3-11-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# feleur.0908a
No. 12-5095.

#### Prawdzik *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### COM. v. PARKER, J.

956 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/25/2017

MC-51-MD-0000081-2016 (Philadelphia)

Reversed/Vacated
No. 11-10837.

#### McQueen *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

DAVID O’DONNELL,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

AVIS RENT A CAR SYSTEM, LLC, ACE AMERICAN 

INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendants-Appellees

______________________

2022-1768

______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Northern District of Texas in No. 3:19-cv-02687-S-BK, 

Judge Karen Gren Scholer.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

Before LOURIE, CHEN, and STARK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

O R D E R

In response to the court’s June 27, 2022, order to show 

cause why this appeal from a civil action concerning an automobile accident should not be dismissed or transferred, 

David O’Donnell moves unopposed to transfer the appeal 

Case: 22-1768 Document: 18 Page: 1 Filed: 08/26/2022
2 O’DONNELL v. AVIS RENT A CAR SYSTEM, LLC

to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 

stating that he named this court in error in his notice of 

appeal and that he intended to appeal to the Fifth Circuit.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631, 

this case and all transmittals are transferred to the United 

States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

August 26, 2022

 Date

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Case: 22-1768 Document: 18 Page: 2 Filed: 08/26/2022
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THIRTY-SIX WEEK PERIOD ENDED JANUARY
9, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-09-1999
<CASH>                                          12,670
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  131,220
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,403
<INVENTORY>                                    257,673
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               452,793
<PP&E>                                         378,919
<DEPRECIATION>                                 138,161
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,441,082
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          538,453
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        90,919
<OTHER-SE>                                     276,516
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,441,082
<SALES>                                      2,757,158
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,757,158
<CGS>                                        2,262,960
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,262,960
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               385,133
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              33,016
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 78,400
<INCOME-TAX>                                    30,601
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             47,799
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    47,799
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.00
        

</TABLE>
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 48 (Wednesday, March 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 11426]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6113]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. ER96-1081-001]

Sonat Power Marketing, Inc.; Notice of Filing

March 6, 1997.
    Take notice that on February 14, 1997, Sonat Power Marketing, Inc. 
(SPMI) tendered for filing a request for acceptance of its Western 
Systems Power Pool membership to SPMI's affiliate, Sonat Power 
Marketing L.P.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such motions or 
protests should be filed on or before March 17, 1997. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-6113 Filed 3-11-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
No. 12-36.

#### Memphis Housing Authority *v.*Giggers et al.

Sup. Ct. Tenn. Certiorari denied.
## Sample collection : Owosso Graphic Arts Terri Zick to: Christopher Lambesis, Todd Ramaly 04/14/2008 04:02 PM From: Terri Zick <tzick@cticompanies.com > To: Christopher Lambesis/R5/USEPA/US@EPA, Todd Ramaly/R5/USEPA/US@EPA



### HiThank you again for making the trip to Owosso Graphic Arts last Thursday. I wanted to confirm that the press was opened on Friday & we collected the first of 3 grab samples. The lab had some concerns whether they could preserve the sample within the required time frame so we did opt to sample using the methanol field preservation method. It seemed the best option considering the holding time constraints of other non-field preserved methods. I will e-mail you the data as soon as the results are available. Thanks again

in information i The information contained n this electronic message is privileged and/or confidential nformation ntended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of the communication is neither allowed nor intended. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by return e-mail or by calling 800-CTI-TODAY and delete the message. Thank You!
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         265,143
<SECURITIES>                                   30,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,039,769
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (301,786)
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,551,740
<PP&E>                                         3,771,866
<DEPRECIATION>                                 958,420
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 14,114,767
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3,351,580
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       211,022
<OTHER-SE>                                     9,539,518
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   14,114,767
<SALES>                                        3,456,081
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3,456,081
<CGS>                                          2,400,812
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,160,551
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               28,394
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             42,525
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,133,676)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,133,676)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 509,036
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                1,215,072
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   590,432
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.09)
        


</TABLE>
#### Terry KERR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE SERVICING, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 12-35853

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted February 13, 2018 *

Filed February 23, 2018

Terry Kerr, Pro Se

Tonn K. Petersen, Perkins Coie LLP, Boise, ID, for Defendant-Appellee

Before: LEAVY, FERNANDEZ, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Terry Kerr appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in his action alleging federal and state law claims arising from the pending foreclosure of real property. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. *Bourne Valley Court Tr. v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA,*832 F.3d 1154, 1157 (9th Cir. 2016). We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment on the state law claims Kerr raised on his own behalf because Kerr failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact supporting his contention that defendant breached its obligations to Kerr. *See Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.,*477 U.S. 242, 249-50, 106 S.Ct. 2505, 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986) (party opposing summary judgment must come forward with probative evidence as to each element of the claim on which it bears the burden of proof).

We do not consider Kerr’s arguments as to the remaining claims made on behalf of third parties not named in this action because Kerr has no authority to appear as an attorney for other individuals. *See Johns v. County of San Diego,*114 F.3d 874, 877 (9th Cir. 1997).

We do not consider’matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued in the opening brief or arguments raised for the first time on appeal. *See Padgett v. Wright,*587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

To the extent Kerr requests permission to supplement the record (Docket Entry No. 13), the request is denied.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**Exhibit 3.3**

**CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT TO THE**

**RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION**

**OF**

**VICAL INCORPORATED**

Vical Incorporated, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, hereby certifies as follows:

FIRST: The name of the corporation is Vical Incorporated. 

SECOND: The date of filing of its original Certificate of Incorporation with the Secretary of State of Delaware was April 30, 1987.

THIRD: At a meeting of the Board of Directors of Vical Incorporated, resolutions were duly adopted providing that the firstsentence of Paragraph A of Article IV of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Vical Incorporated, as amended, shall be amended and restated to read in its entirety as follows: 

“Classes of Stock. The total number of shares of all classes of capital stock which the corporation shall haveauthority to issue is One Hundred Sixty-Five Million (165,000,000), of which One Hundred Sixty Million (160,000,000) shares of the par value of One Cent ($0.01) each shall be Common Stock (the “Common Stock”) and five million(5,000,000) shares of the par value of One Cent ($0.01) each shall be Preferred Stock (the “Preferred Stock”).” 

FOURTH: This Certificate of Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation was duly adopted at the annual meeting of thestockholders, which was duly called and held, upon notice in accordance with Section 222 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, by the holders of at least a majority of the corporation’s outstanding stock in accordancewith section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware. 

IN WITNESS THEREOF, Vical Incorporated has causedthis certificate to be signed by the undersigned officer, thereunto duly authorized, this 2nd day of June, 2010.
ARTHUR ANDERSEN




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent  public  accountants,  we hereby consent to the  incorporation by
reference in this Form 10-K of our report dated  January 26, 2000  included
in Registration  Statement File No. 33-65418,  Registration Statement 333-03289,
Registration  Statement File No. 333-03303 and  Registration  Statement File No.
333-53367.  It should be noted that we have not audited any financial statements
of the Company subsequent to December 31, 1999 or performed any audit procedures
subsequent to the date of our report.


/s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
--------------------------
Arthur Andersen LLP



Albuquerque, New Mexico
March 8, 2000
# C_2023223EN.01002201.xml

| 26.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 223/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 223/22

---

Judgment of the General Court of 3 May 2023 — FFI Female Financial Invest v EUIPO — MLP Finanzberatung (Financery)

(Case T-7/22) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark Financery - Earlier EU word mark financify - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2023/C 223/30)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: FFI Female Financial Invest GmbH (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: M. Gramsch, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Klee and E. Nicolás Gómez, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: MLP Finanzberatung SE (Wiesloch, Germany) (represented by: G. Hodapp, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 21 October 2021 (Case R 1820/2020-5).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders FFI Female Financial Invest GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders FFI Female Financial Invest GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 84, 21.2.2022.

---