# Technical Support Document

for the

Development of the 2017 / 2020

Emission Inventor ies

for Regional Air Quality Modeling

in the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region

Version 3.3

Prepared for:

Mid

- Atlantic Regional Air Management Association (MARAMA)

8600 LaSalle Road, Suite 636

Towson, MD 21286

(443) 901

- 1882

January 23, 2012

MARAMA Contract Agreement FY2011

- 004

Submitted by

AMEC Environment & Infrastructure SRA International, Inc.

4021 Stirrup Creek Drive 652 Peter Jefferson Parkway

Suite 100 Suite 300

Durham, NC 27703 Charlottesville, VA 22911

919 381

- 9900 571 499

- 0833

### Acknowledgements

This work was supported by funds provided by MARAMA’s Memorandum of Agreement with

the Ozone Transport Commission, which is funded by USEPA grant agreement XA973180

–

Regional Haze Planning in the Northeast and Mid

- Atlantic States.

About MARAMA

The Mid

- Atlantic Regional Air Management Association, Inc. is a voluntary, non

- profit

association of ten state and local air pollution control agenci es. MARAMA's mission is to

strengthen the skills and capabilities of member agencies and to help them work together to

prevent and reduce air pollution in the Mid

- Atlantic Region. MARAMA provides cost

- effective

approaches to regional collaboration by pool ing resources to develop and analyze data, share

ideas, and train staff to implement common requirements.Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page i



## Table of Contents

1.0 INTRODUCTION

................................ ................................ ................................ .................. 1

1.1 INVENTORY PURPOSE

................................ ................................ ................................ 1

1.2 POLL UTANTS

................................ ................................ ................................ ................ 2

1.3 SOURCE CATEGORIES

................................ ................................ ................................ 2

1.4 DATA FORMATS

................................ ................................ ................................ ........... 4

1.5 INVENTORY VERSIONS

................................ ................................ ............................... 4

1.5.1 Version 1 Modeling Inventory

................................ ................................ .................. 4

1.5.2 Version 2 Modeling Inventory

................................ ................................ .................. 5

1.5.3 Version 3 Modeling Inventories with Existing and Potential Controls

....................... 5

1.6 REPORT ORGANIZATION

................................ ................................ ............................. 6

2.0 IDENTIFICATION O F EGU AND NONEGU POI NT SOURCES

................................ ........... 7

3.0 GROWTH PROJECTIO N FACTORS FOR NONEGU S AND AREA SOURCES

................ 15

3.1 AEO FUEL USE PROJECTIONS

................................ ................................ ................... 15

3.2 POPULATION PROJECTIONS

................................ ................................ ..................... 16

3.3 EMPLOYMENT PROJECTIONS

................................ ................................ ................... 23

3.4 VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED PROJECTIONS

................................ .............................. 23

3.5 NO GROWTH ASSIGNMENT FOR CERTAIN AREA SOURCE CATEGORIES

............. 23

3.6 EPA 2020 PROJECTIONS FOR RESIDENTIAL WOOD AND LIVESTOCK

................... 27

3.7 SCC, SIC, NAICS AND GROWTH PAR AMETER CROSSWALK

................................ ... 28

3.8 FINAL GROWTH FACTORS FOR NONEGU / AREA SOURCES

................................ .. 28

3.9 EMISSION REDUCTION CREDITS

................................ ................................ ............... 30

4.0 AREA SOURCE CONT ROL FACTORS

................................ ................................ ............. 33

4.1 FEDERAL RULES AFFECTING AREA SOURCES

................................ ........................ 33

4.2 FEDERAL MACT RULES

................................ ................................ .............................. 34

4.3 RECENT CONTROL TECHNIQUE GUIDELINES

................................ .......................... 35

4.4 OTC MODEL RULES FOR AREA SOURCES

................................ ................................ 37

4.4.1 OTC Model Rule for Adhesives/Sealants

................................ ............................... 39

4.4.2 OTC Model Rules for Architectural and Industrial Maintenance Coatings

.............. 40

4.4.3 OTC Model Rule for Asphalt Paving

................................ ................................ ...... 43

4.4.4 OTC Model Rules for Consumer Products

................................ ............................. 44

4.4.5 OTC Model Rules for Mobile Equipment Repair and Refinishing

........................... 46

4.4.6 OTC Model Rules for Portable Fuel Containers

................................ ..................... 49

4.4.7 OTC Model Rule for Solvent Cleaning

................................ ................................ ... 50

4.4.8 OTC Model Rules for ICI Boilers

................................ ................................ ............ 51

4.4.9 OTC Model Rule for New, Small, Natural Gas

- fired Boi lers

................................ ... 53

4.4.10 MANE

- VU Low Sulfur Fuel Oil Strategy

................................ ............................. 55Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page ii



### 5.0 NONEGU POINT SOU RCE CONTROL FACTORS

................................ ............................ 56

5.1 FEDERAL ACTIONS AFFECTING NONEGU POINT SOURCES

................................ .. 56

5.2 RECENT CONTROL TECHNIQUE GUIDELINES

................................ .......................... 59

5.3 OTC MODEL RULES FOR NONEGU S



### ................................ ................................ .......... 59

5.3.1 OTC 2006 Model Rule for Adhesives and Sealants

................................ ............... 62

5.3.2 OTC 2009/2010 Model Rule for Large Storage Tanks

................................ ........... 63

5.3.3 OTC 2006 Model Rule for Asphalt Production Plants

................................ ............. 64

5.3.4 OTC 2006 Model Rule for Cement Manufacturing Plants

................................ ....... 64

5.3.5 OTC 2006 Model Rule for Glass and Fiberglass Furnaces

................................ .... 66

5.3.6 OTC 2006 Model Rule for ICI Boilers

................................ ................................ ..... 66

5.4 FUEL OIL SULFUR LIMITS

................................ ................................ ........................... 69

5.5 STATE

- SPECIFIC NONEGU CONTROL FACTORS

................................ ..................... 70

6.0 NONROAD MODEL CA TEGORIES

................................ ................................ ................... 72

6.1 STATE REVIEW OF NMIM FUEL CHARACTERISTICS

................................ ................ 72

6.2 USE OF EXTERNAL FILES IN THE PROJECTION YEAR NMIM RUNS

........................ 73

6.3 NMIM RUN SPECIFICATIONS

................................ ................................ ...................... 73

6.4 REMOVAL OF AIRPORT GROUND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT

................................ ...... 74

6.5 STATE AND STAKEHOLDER REVIEW AND COMMENT

................................ ............. 74

6.6 CHANGES MADE FOR VERSION 3 MODEL RUNS

................................ ...................... 74

6.7 NMIM/NONROAD GROWTH AND CONTROL INFORMATION

................................ ..... 76

7.0 NONROAD MAR SOUR CE CATEGORIES

................................ ................................ ........ 80

7.1 COMMERCIAL MARINE VESSELS

................................ ................................ ............... 80

7.1.1 CMV Diesel Growth Factors

................................ ................................ ................... 80

7.1.2 CMV Diesel Control Factors

................................ ................................ ................... 81

7.1.3 CMV Residual Oil Growth Factors

................................ ................................ ......... 82

7.1.4 CMV Residual Oil Control Factors

................................ ................................ ......... 82

7.1.5 Military Vessels Growth and Control Factors

................................ ......................... 83

7.2 AIRCRAFT

................................ ................................ ................................ .................... 83

7.2.1 Aircraft Growth Factors

................................ ................................ .......................... 84

7.2.2 Aircraft Control Factors

................................ ................................ .......................... 85

7.3 RAILROAD EQUIPMENT

................................ ................................ .............................. 86

7.3.1 Railroad Growth Factors

................................ ................................ ........................ 87

7.3.2 Railroad Control Factors

................................ ................................ ........................ 87

8.0 SUMMARY OF PROJE CTED EMISSIONS

................................ ................................ ........ 89

8.1 AREA SOURCE PROJECTED EMISSIONS

................................ ................................ .. 89

8.2 NONEGU POINT SOURCE PROJECTED EMISSIONS

................................ ................ 98

8.3 NONROAD NMIM SOURCE PROJECT EMISSIONS

................................ .................. 107

8.4 NONROAD COMMERCIAL MARINE VESSEL EMISSIONS

................................ ........ 115Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page iii



### 8.5 NONROAD AIRPORT EMISSIONS

................................ ................................ ............. 123

8.6 NONROAD RAILROAD LOCOMOTIVE EMISSIONS

................................ .................. 131

9.0 PREPARATION OF S MOKE MODEL FILES

................................ ................................ ... 139

9.1 NONEGU POINT SOURCE SMOKE EMISSION FILES

................................ ............... 139

9.2 AREA SOURCE SMOKE EMISSION FILES

................................ ................................ 139

9.3 NONROAD NMIM SMOKE EMISSION FILES

................................ .............................. 139

9.4 NONROAD MAR SMOKE EMISSION FILES

................................ ............................... 140

10.0 FINAL DELIVERAB LES

................................ ................................ ................................ . 141

11.0 REFERENCES

................................ ................................ ................................ ................ 146Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page iv



## List of Appendices

Appendix A Identification of EGUs and NonEGUs

Appendix B 1 AEO2010 New England.xls

Appendix B 2 AEO2010 Mid Atlantic.xls

Appendix B3 AEO2010 South Atlantic.xls

Appendix B 4 AEO2011 New England.xls

Appendix B 5 AEO2011 Mid Atlantic.xls

Appendix B 6 AEO2011 South Atlantic. xls

Appendix B 7 AEO2010 vs AEO2011 Comparison.docx

Appendix C Population Factors.xls

Appendix D Employment Factors.xls

Appendix E VMT Factors.xls

Appendix F USEPA 2020 Residential Wood Projection Factors

Appendix G USEPA 2020 Livestock Projection Factors

Appendix H Stage II Control Factors

Appendix I Area Source ICI Boiler Control Factor Derivation.xlsx

Appendix J Area Source New Small Gas

- Fired Boiler Control Factor Derivation

Appendix K Fuel Oil Sulfur Contents and MANE

- VU Limits

Appendix L

– Supporting Data for Final MAR Source Growth and Control Factors for 2017 and

2020Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page v



## List of Exhibits

Exhibit 2.1 2007 EGU and NonEGU Point Source CO Emissions

Exhibit 2.2 2007 EGU and NonEGU Point Source NH3 Emissions

Exhibit 2.3 2007 EGU and NonEG U Point Source NOx Emissions

Exhibit 2.4 2007 EGU and NonEGU Point Source PM10

- PRI Emissions

Exhibit 2.5 2007 EGU and NonEGU Point Source PM25

- PRI Emissions

Exhibit 2.6 2007 EGU and NonEGU Point Source SO2 Emissions

Exhibit 2.7 2007 EGU and NonEGU Poin t Source VOC Emissions

Exhibit 3.1 Growth Factors for Coal Fuel Use by AEO Region 2007

- 2025

Exhibit 3.2 Growth Factors for Residual Oil Fuel Use by AEO Region 2007

- 2025

Exhibit 3.3 Growth Factors for Distillate Oil Fuel Use by AEO Region 2007

- 202 5

Exhibit 3.4 Growth Factors for Natural Gas Fuel Use by AEO Region 2007

- 2025

Exhibit 3.5 Growth Factors for Gasoline Fuel Use by AEO Region 2007

– 2025

Exhibit 3.6 Population Growth Factors by AEO Region 2007

– 2025

Exhibit 3.7. Employment Growth Fa ctors by AEO Region 2007

- 2025

Exhibit 3.8 State VMT Growth Factors 2007

– 2020

Exhibit 3.9 Area Source Categories with No Growth Assignment

Exhibit 3 .1 0 State Recommendations to Address Negative Growth for the NonEGU Point

Source Sector

Exhibit 3.11 State Recommendations to Address Negative Growth and Other Growth Factors

for the Area Source Sector

Exhibit 4.1 USEPA Estimated Percent Reductions for RICE MACT Standard

Exhibit 4.2 Summary of Area Source OTC Control Measures

Exhibit 4.3 State Recom mendations for OTC Adhesives/Sealants Rule

Exhibit 4.4 State Recommendations for OTC AIM Rule

Exhibit 4.5 State Recommendations for OTC Cutback and Emulsified Asphalt Paving

Exhibit 4.6 VOC Emission Factors for Consumer Products

Exhibit 4.7 State Rec ommendations for OTC 2001 and 2006 Consumer Products Rules

Exhibit 4.8 VOC Emission Reductions for Auto Refinishing

Exhibit 4.9 State Recommendations for OTC Auto Refinishing Rule

Exhibit 4.10 State Recommendations for OTC and Federal Portable Fuel Cont ainer Rules

Exhibit 4.11 State Recommendations for OTC Solvent Cleaning RuleDocumentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page vi



### Exhibit 4.12 Area Source Emission Reductions from New Jersey ICI Boiler NOx Rules

Exhibit 4.13 OTC Resolution 06

- 02 Guidelines for ICI Boiler NOx Rules

Exhibit 4.14 NOx Emissi on Reductions Expected from the OTC Rule for New, Small, Natural

Gas

- fired Units

Exhibit 4.1 5 MANE

- VU Low Sulfur Fuel Oil Strategy

Exhibit 5.1 USEPA Estimated Percent Reductions for RICE MACT Standard

Exhibit 5.2 Summary of Point Source OTC Control Mea sures

Exhibit 5.3 State Recommendations for OTC Adhesives/Sealants Rule

Exhibit 5.4 NonEGU Point Source Emission Reductions from New Jersey ICI Boiler NOx Rules

Exhibit 5.5 OTC Resolution 06

- 02 Guidelines for ICI Boiler NOx Rules

Exhibit 6 .1 Control Programs Included in the NMIM/NONROAD Model

Exhibit 7 .1 CMV Diesel Control Factors by Year, Pollutant, and SCC

Exhibit 7 .2 CMV Residual Oil Control Factors by Year, Pollutant, and SCC

Exhibit 7 .3 Crosswalk between SCC and FAA Operations Type

Exhibit 7 .4 Region

- wide Growth Factors from 2007 by FAA Operations Type

Exhibit 7 .5 Rail Control Factors by Year, Pollutant, and SCC

Exhibit 8. 1 2007 and Projected Future Year Area Source CO Emissions

Exhibit 8. 2 2007 and Projected Future Year Area Source NH3 Emissions

Exhibit 8. 3 2007 and Projected Future Year Area Source NOx Emissions

Exhibit 8. 4 2007 and Projected Future Year Area Source PM10

- PRI Emissions

Exhibit 8. 5 2007 and Projected Future Year Area Source PM25

- PRI Emissions

Exhibit 8. 6 2007 and Proj ected Future Year Area Source SO2 Emissions

Exhibit 8. 7 2007 and Projected Future Year Area Source VOC Emissions

Exhibit 8.8 2007 and Projected Future Year NonEGU Point Source CO Emissions

Exhibit 8.9 2007 and Projected Future Year NonEGU Point Source N H3 Emissions

Exhibit 8.10 2007 and Projected Future Year NonEGU Point Source NOx Emissions

Exhibit 8.11 2007 and Projected Future Year NonEGU Point Source PM10

- PRI Emissions

Exhibit 8.12 2007 and Projected Future Year NonEGU Point Source PM25

- PRI Emissi ons

Exhibit 8.13 2007 and Projected Future Year NonEGU Point Source SO2 Emissions

Exhibit 8.14 2007 and Projected Future Year NonEGU Point Source VOC Emissions

Exhibit 8.15 2007 and Projected Future Year NONROAD Source CO EmissionsDocumentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page vii



### Exhibit 8.16 2007 and Projected Future Year NONROAD Source NH3 Emissions

Exhibit 8.17 2007 and Projected Future Year NONROAD Source NOx Emissions

Exhibit 8.18 2007 and Projected Future Year NONROAD Source PM10

- PRI Emissions

Exhibit 8.19 2007 and Projected Future Y ear NONROAD Source PM25

- PRI Emissions

Exhibit 8.20 2007 and Projected Future Year NONROAD Source SO2 Emissions

Exhibit 8.21 2007 and Projected Future Year NONROAD Source VOC Emissions

Exhibit 8

. 22 2007 and Projected Future Year Marine Vessel CO Emissions

Exhibit 8

. 23 2007 and Projected Future Year Marine Vessel NH3 Emissions

Exhibit 8

. 24 2007 and Projected Future Year Marine Vessel NOx Emissions

Exhibit 8

. 25 2007 and Projected Future Year Marine Vessel PM10

- PRI Emissions

Exhibit 8

. 26 2007 and Projected Future Year Marine Vessel PM25

- PRI Emissions

Exhibit 8

. 27 2007 and Projected Future Year Marine Vessel SO2 Emissions

Exhibit 8

. 28 2007 and Projected Future Year Marine Vessel VOC Emissions

Exhibit 8

. 29 2007 and Projected Future Year Airport CO Emissions

Exhibit 8

. 30 2007 and Projected Future Year Airport NH3 Emissions

Exhibit 8

. 31 2007 and Projected Future Year Airport NOx Emissions

Exhibit 8

. 32 2007 and Projected Future Year Airport PM10

- PRI Emissions

Exhibit 8

. 33 2007 and Projec ted Future Year Airport PM25

- PRI Emissions

Exhibit 8

. 34 2007 and Projected Future Year Airport SO2 Emissions

Exhibit 8

. 35 2007 and Projected Future Year Airport VOC Emissions

Exhibit 8

. 36 2007 and Projected Future Year Railroad Locomotive CO Emissions

E xhibit 8

. 37 2007 and Projected Future Year Railroad Locomotive NH3 Emissions

Exhibit 8

. 38 2007 and Projected Future Year Railroad Locomotive NOx Emissions

Exhibit 8

. 39 2007 and Projected Future Year Railroad Locomotive PM10

- PRI Emissions

Exhibit 8

. 40 2 007 and Projected Future Year Railroad Locomotive PM25

- PRI Emissions

Exhibit 8

. 41 2007 and Projected Future Year Railroad Locomotive SO2 Emissions

Exhibit 8

. 42 2007 and Projected Future Year Railroad Locomotive VOC Emissions

Exhibit 1 0 .1

– NIF Data Files

Exhibit 1 0 .2

– Emission Summary Files

Exhibit 1 0 .3

– SMOKE FilesDocumentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page viii



## A cronyms and Abbreviations

Acronym Description

CAMD Clean Air Markets Division ( US EPA)

CAP Criteria Air Pollutant

CEM Continuous Emission Monitoring

CMV Commercial Marine Vessel

CO Carbon Monoxide

CTG Control Technique Guideline

EGU Electric Generating Unit

ERTAC Eastern Regional Technical Advisory Co mmittee

FIPS Federal Information Processing Standard

GACT Generally available control technology

GSE Ground Support Equipment

MACT Maximum Achievable Control Technology

MANE

- VU Mid

- Atlantic/Northeast Visibility Union

MANE

- VU+VA MANE

- VU States plus Virginia

MAR Marine, Airport, Rail

MARAMA Mid

- Atlantic Regional Air Management Association

MOBILE6 USEPA model

MOVES Motor Vehicle Emissions Simulator

NAICS North American Industry Classification System code

NCD National County Database

NEI National Emission Inventory

NESCAUM Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use Management

NH3 Ammonia

NIF3.0 National Emission Inventory Input Format Version 3.0

NMIM National Mobile Input Model

N O F3.0 National Emission Inventory Output Format Version 3.0

NONROAD USEPA model

NOx Oxides of nitrogen

OAQPS Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (USEPA)

ORL One

- record

- per

- line (SMOKE Format)

OTAQ Office of Transportation and Air Quality ( US EPA)

PFC Portable Fuel Container

PM

- CON Primary PM, Condensable portion only ( < 1 micron)

PM

- FIL Primary PM, Filterable portion only

PM

- PRI Primary PM, includes filterables and condensable s

PM

- PRI= PM

- FIL + PM

- CONDocumentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page ix

Acronym Description

PM10

- FIL Primary PM10, Filterable portion only

PM10

- PRI Primary PM10, includes filterables and condensable s

,

PM10

- PRI = PM0

- FIL + PM

- CON

PM25

- FIL Primary PM2.5, Filterable portion only

PM25

- PRI Primary PM2.5, includes filterables and condens a bles

PM25

- PRI= PM25

- FIL + PM

- CON

RWC Residential Wood Combustion

SEMAP Southeast Modeling, Analysis and Planning

SIC Standard Industrial Classification code

SIP State Implementation Plan

SCC Source Classification Code

S/L State/local

SMOKE Sparse Matrix Operator Kernel Emissions

SO2 Sulfur Dioxide

USEPA U.S Environmental Protection Agency

VISTAS Visibility Improvement State and Tribal Association of the Southeast

VMT Vehicle Miles Traveled

VOC Volatile O rganic C ompoundsDocumentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 1



## 1.0 INTRODUCTION

This technical support document (TSD) explains the data sources and methods used to

prepare criteria air pollutant (CAP) and ammonia (NH3) emission projections for 2017 and

2020 for the Northeast and Mid

- Atlantic/Northeast region. The region includes the

jurisdictions in the Mid

- Atlantic / Northeast Visibility Union (MANE

- VU) area plus

Virginia. In this document, these jurisdictions will be referred to as the MANE

- VU+VA

region. The MANE

- VU+VA region includes Connecticut, Delaware, the District of

Columbi a, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York,

Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Virginia.

1.1 INVENTORY PURPOSE

The MANE

- VU+VA regional inventories will be used to concurrently address national

ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) requirements for the new ozone and fine particle

ambient standards and to evaluate progress towards long

- term regional haze goals. The

emission inventories will support a single integrated, one

- atmosphere air quality modeling

platform , s tate air quality attainment demonstrations , and other s tate air quality technical

analyses.

The future year inventories account for emissions growth associated with changes in

population , fuel use, and economic activity . The future year inventories also refect the

emission changes between 2007 and the two future year s that are projected under two

emission control scenarios:

Existing Controls

– this scenario represent s the best estimate s for the future year

, accounting for all in

- place controls that are fully adopted into federal or individual

state regulations or State Implementation Plans (SIPs) . In the past, this inventory is

also referred to as the “ on

- the

- books (OTB)” inventory. Air quality m odelers often

refer to this scenario as the “ future base case .”

Potential New OTC Controls

– this scenario accounts for all of the emission

reductions from the existing control scenario plus new state or regional measures

that are under consideration by the Ozone Transport Comm ission (OTC) or

individual states. This is a “ what if ” scenario that assumes that all states in the

MANE

- VU+VA region except Virginia will adopt all new OTC control measures

under consideration by 2017. Air quality m odelers sometimes call this the “ future

control case .” It does not include any potential new federal control measures that

are under consideration.Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 2



### The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) has provided guidance on

developing emission projections to be used with models and other analyses for

demonstrating attainment of air quality goals for ozone, fine particles, and regional haze

(USEPA 1999, USEPA 2005a, USEPA 2007a). In addition, the USEPA has recently

developed its own emission projections that provide data on growth and futu re controls

that were useful in developing the MANE

- VU+VA future year emission inventories

(USEPA 2010a). The guidance and information available from USEPA was followed and

used, as appropriate, in developing the future year emission projections.

1.2 POLLUT ANTS

The inventory includes annual emissions for carbon monoxide (CO), ammonia (NH3),

oxides of nitrogen (NOx), particulate matter (PM), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and volatile

organic compounds (VOC). The PM species in the inventory are categorized as: filte rable

and condensable particles with an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to a nominal 10

and 2.5 micrometers (i.e., PM10

- PRI and PM25

- PRI); filterable particles with an

aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to a nominal 10 and 2.5 micrometers (i.e ., PM10

-

FIL and PM25

- FIL); and condensable particles (PM

- CON). Note that PM10

- PRI equals

the sum of PM10

- FIL and PM

- CON, and PM25

- PRI equals the sum of PM25

- FIL and

PM

- CON.

1.3 SOURCE CATEGORIES

Emission inventory data from six general categories are needed t o support air quality

modeling: electric generating units (EGUs), stationary nonEGU point

- source s , stationary

area

- source s

, on

- road mobile sources, nonroad mobile sources, and biogenic/geogenic

emissions. Th is report documents the development of emission projections for three of

these sectors, as follows:

NonEGU Point Source s are individual facilities and are further subdivided by

stack, emission unit (“point”), and emission process (“segment”). Point source data

include source

- specific information on s ource location (e.g., latitude/longitude

coordinates); stack parameters (stack diameter and height, exit gas temperature and

velocity); type of process (source classification code {SCC}); and annual

emissions.

Stationary Area Source s include sources that in and of themselves are quite small

, but in aggregate may contribute significant emissions. Examples include small

industrial/commercial facilities, residential heating furnaces , VOCs volatizing fromDocumentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 3



### house painting or consumer products , gasoline service stations, and agricultural

fertilizer/pesticide application

.

Non

- road Mobile Sources include i nternal combustion engines used to prop e l

marine vessels, airplanes, and locomotives, or to operate equipment such as

forklifts, lawn and garden equipment, p ortable generators, etc. For activities other

than marine vessels, airplanes, and railroad locomotives (MAR) , the inventory was

developed using the most current version of USEPA’s NONROAD model as

embedded in the National Mobile Inventory Model (NMIM) . S ince the

NONROAD model does not include emissions from MAR sources , these emissions

were estimated based on data and methodologies used in recent USEPA regulatory

impact analyses.

For these three sectors, emissions projections were compiled on an annual basis to

represent conditions in 2017 and 2020

.

Emission projections for the three other sectors are being developed by the OTC under

separate efforts:

EGU Point Source s are units that generate electric power and sell most of th at

power to the electrica l grid. Emission projections for EGUs are being developed as

part of an inter

- RPO coordination effort under the direction of the Eastern Regional

Technical Advisory Committee (ERTAC).

On

- r oad Mobile Source s are sources of air pollution from internal com bustion

engines used to propel cars, trucks, buses, and other vehicles on public roadways.

Emission projections for on

- road mobile sources are being developed under a

separate effort by the OTC that will use the USEPA Motor Vehicle Emission

Simulator (MOV ES) model.

Biogenic emissions are emitted by natural sources, such as plants, trees, and soils.

The sharp scent of pine needles, for instance, is caused by monoterpenes, which are

VOCs. The USEPA developed estimate s of biogenic emissions fr om vegetation for

natural areas, crops, and urban vegetation. The USEPA estimates t ake into account

the geographic variations in vegetation land cover and species composition, as well

as seasonal variations in leaf cover. Emission projections for biogeni c sources will

be developed under a separate effort by the OTC modeling team.

Documentation of the emission projections for these three sectors will be available from

the OTC.Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 4



### 1.4 DATA FORMATS

The annual mass emissions inventory files were prepared in the N ational Emissions

Inventory (NEI) Output Format Version 3.0 (NOF 3.0). Spreadsheets summarizing

emissions by county, sector, source classification code, and pollutant were also prepared.

These annual emission inventories will be converted (through the em issions modeling

process) from their original resolution (e.g., annual, county level) to input files for air

quality models. These input files require emissions to be specified by model grid cell,

hour, and model chemical species. The emission modelers i n the MANE

- VU+VA region

are using the Sparse Matrix Operator Kernel Emissions (SMOKE) modeling system and

data formats. Emission inventory files were prepared in SMOKE compatible format.

1.5 INVENTORY VERSIONS

1.5.1 Version 1 Modeling Inventor y

Work commenced in 2009 to assembl e comprehensive 2007 and future year emission

inventories to support air quality modeling

. Using data available from state agencies and

the USEPA, detailed point and area source emission inventories were compiled. The

NONROAD model was used to estimate emissions for the nonroad equipment categories

included in the model. State and USEPA data were used to assemble the inventory for

nonroad sources not included in the NONROAD model ( m arine vessels, a ircraft, and

r ailroad locomot ives, collectively referred to as the MAR sector).

For the point, area, and MAR sectors , growth factors are applied to account for changes in

population , fuel use and economic activity. Next, control factors are applied to account for

future emission re ductions from post

- 2007 control measures

. The NONROAD model was

used to project emissions for the nonroad equipment included in the model. The control

scenario developed account ed for post

- 2007 emission reductions from promulgated

federal, State, local, and site

- specific control programs and proposed control programs that

are reasonably anticipated to result in post

- 2007 emission reductions. A series of quality

assurance steps are conducted to ensure the development of complete, accurate, and

consistent emission inventories. The inventories are provided in two formats

– SMOKE

One

- Record

- Per

- Line (ORL) format and a spreadsheet format suitable for SIP submittals.

Finally, emission summary tables by state and pollutant were developed.

Version 1 of the 20 07 base year inventory and the emission projections for

2013/2017/2020 were released for state and stakeholder review in late 2009 and early

2010.Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 5



### 1.5.2 Version 2 Modeling Inventor y

Following the review of Version 1, significant efforts were made to improve th e inventory

by using more state

- specific data and correct ing errors or omissions that were uncovered.

These improvements were completed in February of 2011 and are referred to as Version 2

of the MANE

- VU+VA 2007 and 2013/2017/2020 inventor ies . The inventories were

documented in two TSDs ( MARAMA 2011a, MARAMA 2011b)

.

1.5.3 Version 3 Modeling Inventories with Existing and Potential Controls

Beginning in the fall of 2011, MARAMA sponsored development of Version 3 of the 2007

base year modeling invent ory to incorporate new paved road emission estimates, revised

modeling of nonroad and onroad sources , and other state

- specific changes

(MARAMA201 2 ).

This report documents the development of Version 3 of the future year inventor ies for the

area source, no nEGU, and nonroad sectors. The future year modeling inventories for

EGU ) are currently being developed under a separate effort lead by ERTAC. The future

year modeling inventories for onroad sources are currently being developed by

NESCAUM, MARAMA or indi vidual states.

In Version 3, the state Air Directors issued guidance on the future year emission control

scenarios to be developed, as follows:

“ A special meeting of the Air Directors was convened to discuss the controlled

inventory. During that call ma ny Air Directors indicated that they would not be

able to clearly identify which of the control measures their states would adopt

because of the uncertainty surrounding the ozone standard. Therefore

, all states,

except Virginia, requested that the contrac tor be instructed to calculate the effect of

all measures being fully adopted by both 2017 and 2020. This will allow modelers

to assess the potential effect of the measures if they were fully implemented on air

quality. We can also then test the assumpti ons that we have been making about the

cumulative percent reduction from the measures. ”

Thus, these TSD discusses two future control scenarios: an “existing controls” scenario

scenario intended to include all 2017/2020 control measaures included in an indi vidual

state’s regulations or SIP, and a "what if" scenario that assumes that all states adopt

certain new control measures by 2017.Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 6



### 1.6 REPORT ORGANIZATION

Section 2 describes how point source emission units were classified into the EGU or

nonEGU point sou rce categories. Section 3 discusses the growth projection factors

assembled for area and nonEGU point sources. Sections 4 and 5 describe the control

factors used for area and nonEGU point sources, respectively. Section 6 describes the

NONROAD model runs made for the future years. Section 7 documents how emissions

for marine vessels, aircraft, and railroad equipment were projected. Section 8 provides

state level emission pollutant summaries for area, nonEGU point, NONROAD, and MAR

sectors. Section 9 do cuments the creation of SMOKE inventory modeling input files.

Section 1 0 identifies the file names for final deliverable products. References for the TSD

are provided in Section 1 1

.Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 7



## 2.0 IDENTIFICATION OF EGU AND NONEGU POINT SOURCES

Only the emissions from point sources classified as nonEGUs are being projected using the

methods and data contained in this report. Emissions from EGU point sources are being

developed by ERTAC.

States were asked to classify units in the 2007 MANE

- VU+V A emissions inventory as

either EGU or nonEGU. Most, but not all, of the units that are required to report hourly

emissions to USEPA ’s Clean Air Markets Division (CAMD) are classified as EGUs.

CAMD implements USEPA ’s rule found in Volume 40 Part 75 of th e Code of Federal

Regulations (CFR), which requires an hourly accounting of emissions from each affected

unit

- i.e., sources participating in an emissions cap and trade program under the Acid

Rain Control Program, the NOx Budget Trading Program, or the C lean Air Interstate Rule.

For the ERTAC projection methodology

, the following guidance was provided to state s to

classify a unit as an EGU if it meets the following criteria:

An EGU sells most of the power generated to the electrical grid;

An EGU burns mostly commercial fuel. Commercial fuel in this case means

natural gas, oil, and coal. Wood is not considered a commercial fuel because some

states identify wood as renewable . T herefore, to avoid double counting, units that

burn wood and other renewable sources (depending on each state's own definition)

should not be considered as an EGU (unless it is already in the CAMD database)

.

The following are units were not considered as EGU for emission projections : (1) a unit

that generates power for a facility b ut occasionally sells to the grid; (2) e mergency

generators; or (3) d istributed generation units.

States were provided with a list of units that report to CAMD (USEPA 2009a) and a list of

units with an electric generating unit SCC (1

- 01

- xxx

- xx or 2

- 01

- xxx

- xx). States identified

which units should be classified as EGUs and which should be classified as nonEGUs.

Appendix A identifies the units that report emissions to CAMD and whether they are

classified as EGUs or nonEGUs for emission projection purposes. A few state s also

identified units with SCCs beginning with 1

- 01 or 2

- 01 that do not report to CAMD but

which should be classified as EGUs; however, for emission projection purposes these units

will be processed using the nonEGU projection methodology des cribed in this report.

Exhibits 2.1 to 2. 7 summarize EGU and nonEGU emissions for 2007. For these exhibits,

EGUs are defined as units that report emissions to CAMD and have been classified as

EGUs by the state s for emission projection purposes.Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 8



### Exhibit 2.1 2007 EGU and NonEGU Point Source CO Emissions (tons per year)

State EGU NonEGU Total

CT 1,095 2,584 3,679

DE 726 7,027 7,753

DC 10 301 311

ME 460 14,023 14,483

MD 4,196 77,574 81,770

MA 5,516 4,592 10,108

NH 910 2,254 3,164

NJ 3,640 6,932 10,572

NY 13,480 52,877 66,357

PA 20,900 80,540 101,440

RI 602 1,051 1,653

VT 1,444 702 2,146

VA 7,273 63,080 70,353

TOTAL 60,252 313,537 373,789Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 9



### Exhibit 2

. 2 2007 EGU and NonEGU Point Source NH3 Emissions (tons per year)

State EGU NonEGU Total

CT 0 0 0

DE 32 62 94

DC 0 0 0

ME 59 606 665

MD 0 137 137

MA 283 365 648

NH 98 30 128

NJ 708 210 918

NY 1,354 1,063 2,417

PA 309 2,070 2,379

RI 58 16 74

VT 0 0 0

VA 212 1,618 1,830

TOTAL 3,113 6,177 9,290Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 10



### Exhibit 2. 3 2007 EGU and NonEGU Point Source NOx Emissions (tons per year)

State EGU NonEGU Total

CT 3,760 6,301 10,061

DE 10,507 5,121 15,628

DC 55 734 789

ME 696 17,050 17,746

MD 51,418 23,472 74,890

MA 10,755 12,873 23,628

NH 4,754 2,687 7,441

NJ 16,571 14,030 30,601

NY 47,450 35,583 83,033

PA 186,997 71,382 258,379

RI 494 950 1,444

VT 370 441 811

VA 62,673 50,265 112,938

TOTAL 396,500 240,889 637,389Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 11



### Exhibit 2. 4 2007 EGU and NonEGU Point Source PM10 Emissions (tons per year)

State EGU NonEGU Total

CT 705 645 1,350

DE 2,268 1,197 3,465

DC 13 46 59

ME 148 4,748 4,896

MD 13,611 5,711 19,322

MA 2,575 3,029 5,604

NH 784 1,141 1,925

NJ 4,496 3,188 7,684

NY 5,044 4,463 9,507

PA 27,470 22,275 49,745

RI 16 173 189

VT 0 146 146

VA 6,175 13,028 19,203

TOTAL 63,305 59,790 123,095Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 12



### Exhibit 2. 5 2007 EGU and NonEGU Point Source PM2.5 Emissions (tons per year)

State EGU NonEGU Total

CT 669 573 1,242

DE 2,024 1,083 3,107

DC 10 43 53

ME 125 3,727 3,852

MD 11,805 3,877 15,682

MA 2,292 2,572 4,864

NH 602 1,061 1,663

NJ 4,410 2,453 6,863

NY 3,585 2,414 5,999

PA 19,071 13,389 32,460

RI 16 124 140

VT 0 114 114

VA 4,593 10,295 14,888

TOTAL 49,202 41,725 90,927Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 13



### Exhibit 2.6 2007 EGU and NonEGU Point Source SO2 Emissions (tons per year)

State EGU NonEGU Total

CT 4,786 3,185 7,971

DE 34,882 8,206 43,088

DC 141 471 612

ME 1,677 15,571 17,248

MD 274,207 31,176 305,383

MA 54,172 9,057 63,229

NH 42,524 2,734 45,258

NJ 37,302 3,490 40,792

NY 108,444 44,307 152,751

PA 970,726 57,330 1,028,056

RI 16 1,500 1,516

VT 6 316 322

VA 188,562 54,486 243,048

TOTAL 1,717,445 231,829 1,949,274Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 14



### Exhibit 2. 7 2007 EGU and NonEGU Point Source VOC Emissions (tons per year)

State EGU NonEGU Total

CT 143 1,447 1,590

DE 83 3,406 3,489

DC 2 57 59

ME 35 4,987 5,022

MD 389 4,597 4,986

MA 463 4,094 4,557

NH 110 806 916

NJ 420 10,620 11,040

NY 1,119 9,772 10,891

PA 770 28,195 28,965

RI 49 921 970

VT 22 373 395

VA 600 35,018 35,618

TOTAL 4,205 104,293 108,498Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 15



## 3.0 GROWTH PROJECTION FACTORS FOR NONEGUs AND AREA

SOURCES

The area and nonEGU point source growth factors were developed using six sets of data:

The Annual Energy Outlook (AEO) fuel consumption forecasts;

County

- level population projections;

State

- level employment projections by NAICS code;

County

- level vehicle miles travelled (VMT) projections;

USEPA projections for livestock and residential wood combustion; and

Other state

- specific emission projection data.

The pri ority for applying these growth factors was to first use the state

- supplied projection

data (if available). If state

- supplied data were not provided , then the AEO projection

factors were used for fuel consumption sources, and the population/employment/VMT data

were used for other source categories

.

3.1 AEO F UEL USE PROJECTIONS

The AEO is published annually by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). It

presents long

- term projections of energy supply, demand, and prices through 2035, based

on result s from EIA’s National Energy Modeling System (NEMS). NEMS projects the

production, imports, conversion, consumption, and prices of energy, subject to

assumptions on macroeconomic and financial factors, world energy markets, resource

availability and costs , behavioral and technological choice criteria, energy technology cost

and performance characteristics, and demographics.

AEO provides regional fuel

- use forecast s for various fuel types (e.g., coal, residual oil,

distillate oil, natural gas) by end use sec tor (e.g., residential, commercial, industrial,

transportation, and electric power)

. Energy use projections are reported at the Census

division level. The c ensus divisions grouped s tates as follows:

South Atlantic

- D E, DC, MD, VA

Middle Atlantic

– N J, NY, PA

New England

– C T, ME, MA, NH, RI, VT

Appendices B1, B2, and B3 contain the AEO2010 fuel use projections for each of these

three regions. Appendices B4, B5, and B6 contain the AEO2011 fuel use projections

Version 2 of the MANE

- VU+VA future yea r inventories was developed using AEO2010

(EIA2010). After the release of Version 2, AEO2011 was published (EIA2011).

MARAMA reviewed the updated fuel forecasts and compared the AEO2010 and

AEO2011 projections. Appendix B7 documents MARAMA’s analysis. MARAMADocumentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 16



### calculated the difference in projected fuel usage between AEO2010 and AEO2011 for the

residential, commercial, industrial, transportation, and electric power sector for the

distillate fuel oil, residual fuel oil, coal, natural gas, and renewable fue l types. MARAMA

identified thresholds for what constitutes a major change as follows:

An increase or decrease of 1% or less is considered to be no change and did not

warrant a change in the growth factors between Versions 2 and 3 of the inventory;

An incr ease or decrease of between 1% and 5% is considered to be a minor change,

and states agreed that these differences between AEO2010 and AEO2011 did not

warrant a change in the growth factors between Versions 2 and 3 of the inventory;

An increase or decrease above 5% is considered a major change, and warrants a

change in the growth factors used in Version 3.

MARAMA recommended that the AEO2010 projections be retained for all residential,

commercial, and industrial sector fuel use, except for industrial natur al gas usage, where

the AEO2011 projections will be used for Version 3 of the future year modeling inventory.

New Jersey elected to use the more recent growth factors from AEO2011 instead of the

AEO2010 growth factors for all area source fossil fuel use c ategories.

Exhibits 3.1 to 3.5 summarize the projected fuel use rates by source sector (residential,

commercial, industrial, transportation) , AEO region, and fuel type for the years 2007 to

2025. The unusual growth in commercial residual oil use in the South Atlantic region

could not be explained; Maryland elected to use manufacturing employment instead of the

AEO2010 growth factor for commercial residual oil combustion, while Virginia and the

District chose to assume flat growth in this sector.

3.2 POPUL ATION PROJECTIONS

States provided county

- level 2007 populations and projections for future years. The

historical and projection years varied from state

- to

- s tate, so values were interpolated, when

necessary, to create population estimates for each year from 2007 to 2025. The population

data were normalized to create growth factors from 2007 for each future year. For

example, Delaware had a population of 861, 087 in 2007 and the projected population in

2017 is 953,204, then the growth factor for 2017 is 953,204 / 861,087 = 1.107.

Population projections are provided in Appendix C. Exhibit 3.6 summarizes the

population growth factors by state and AEO2010 regio n. Population is projected to grow

in every state between 2007 and 2025. The population growth in the New England state s

varies significantly by state . Population growth in the South Atlantic state s is projected to

be much higher than in the New England and Mid

- Atlantic state s.Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 17



### Exhibit 3.1 AEO2010 Growth Factors for Coal by AEO Region 2007

– 2025Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 18



### Exhibit 3.2 Growth Factors for Residual Oil by AEO Region 2007

– 2025Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 19



### Exhibit 3.3 AEO2010 Growth Factors for Distillate Oil by AEO Region 2007

– 2025Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 20



### Exhibit 3.4 Growth Factors for Natural Gas by AEO Region 2007

– 2025

AEO2010 for Residential/Commercial, AEO2011 for IndustrialDocumentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 21



### Exhibit 3.5 AEO2010 Growth Factors for Gasoline by AEO Region 2007

– 2025Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 22



### Exhibit 3.6 Population Growth Factors by AEO Region 2007

– 2025Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 23



### 3.3 EMPLOYMENT PROJECTIONS

Every two years, the federal Bureau of Labor Statistics produces long

- term industry and

occupation forecasts for ten future years and states are asked to do the same for their

respective economies. The most recent projections from state Department’s of Labor of

for the period 2006 to 2016 , most of which were published in 2008

. These 10

- year

forecasts are updated every other year . T he next set of state

- specific projections will be for

the period 2008 to 2018

. Only the District of Columbia and Delaware were able to provide

employment projections for 2008 to 2018; the 2008 to 2018 projections were not available

for other states in time for use on this project. The employment projections are state

- wide

by 3

- digit NAICS code. Employment projections are provided in Appendix D. Exhibit 3.7

summarizes the manufacturing employment (NAICS sector 31

- 33) growth factors by state

and AEO2010 region. States in the Northeast / Mid

- Atla ntic region show a marked

decrease in manufacturing employment from 2007 forward.

3.4 VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED PROJECTIONS

States developed projections of vehicle miles traveled (VMT) for 2007, 2017 and 2020

which were used as the growth factor for projecting emissions from re

- entrained road dust

from travel on paved roads (SCC 22

- 94

- 000

- 000). The 2007 and future year VMT are

identical to those used in the MOVES modeling. Exhibit 3.8 shows the state level VMT

growth between 2007 and 2020. Growth factors for years where VMT were not directly

provided by states were estimated by a linear interpolation of available data. County

specific VMT projections are provided in Appendix E.

3.5 NO GROWTH ASSIGNMENT FOR CERTAIN AREA SOURCE

CATEGORIES

For several area source categories, it seems reasonable that emissions would not change

from the 2007 values. No growth was applied to the 2007 emissions for the area source

categories shown in Exhibit 3.9.Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 24



### Exhibit 3.7

. Manufacturing Employment Growth Factors by AEO R egion 2007

- 2025Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 25



### Exhibit 3.8 State VMT Growth Factors 2007

– 202 0Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 26



### Exhibit 3.9 Area Source Categories with No Growth Assignment

SCC SCC Description

2296000000 Unpaved Roads /All Unpaved Roads /Total: Fugitives

2401008000 Surface Coating /Traffic Markings /Total: All Solvent Types

2461020000 Misc Non

- industrial: Commercial /Asphalt Application: All Processes /Total: All

2461021000 Misc Non

- industrial: Commercial /Cutback Asphalt /Total: All Solvent Types

2461022000 Misc Non

- industrial: Commerci al /Emulsified Asphalt /Total: All Solvent Types

2461023000 Misc Non

- industrial: Commercial /Asphalt Roofing /Total: All Solvent Types

2601000000 On

- site Incineration /All Categories /Total

2601010000 On

- site Incineration /Industrial /Total

2601010000 On

- site Incineration /Industrial /Total

2601020000 On

- site Incineration /Commercial/Institutional /Total

2601020000 On

- site Incineration /Commercial/Institutional /Total

2601030000 On

- site Incineration /Residential /Total

2610000100 Open Burning /All Categories /Yard Waste

- Leaf Species Unspecified

2610000400 Open Burning /All Categories /Yard Waste

- Brush Species Unspecified

2610000500 Open Burning /All Categories /Land Clearing Debris (use 28

- 10

- 005

- 000 for Loggin

2610030000 Open Burning /Reside ntial /Household Waste (use 26

- 10

- 000

- xxx for Yard Wastes)

2610040400 Open Burning /Municipal (from residences, parks,other for central burn)

2660000000 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks /Leaking Underground Storage Tanks /Total: All

2680001000 Composting /100% Biosolids (e.g., sewage sludge, manure, mixtures of these matls

2680002000 Composting /Mixed Waste (e.g., a 50:50 mixture of biosolids and green wastes)

2806010000 Domestic Animals Waste Emissions /Cats /Total

2806015000 Domestic Animal s Waste Emissions /Dogs /Total

2807020001 Wild Animals Waste Emissions /Bears /Black Bears

2807020002 Wild Animals Waste Emissions /Bears /Grizzly Bears

2807025000 Wild Animals Waste Emissions /Elk /Total

2807030000 Wild Animals Waste Emissions /Deer /Total

2807040000 Wild Animals Waste Emissions /Birds /Total

2810001000 Forest Wildfires

- Wildfires

– Unspecified

2810005000 Managed Burning, Slash (Logging Debris) /Unspecified Burn Method

2810010000 Human Perspiration and Respiration /Total

2810014000 Prescribed Burning /Generic

- Unspecified land cover, ownership, class/purpose

2810015000 Prescribed Forest Burning /Unspecified

2810020000 Prescribed Rangeland Burning /Unspecified

2810030000 Structure Fires /Unspecified

2810035000 Firefighting Training /Total

2810050000 Motor Vehicle Fires /Unspecified

2810060200 Cremation /Animals

2810090000 Open Fire /Not categorized

2820010000 Cooling Towers /Process Cooling Towers /Total

2830000000 Catastrophic/Accidental Releases /All Catastrophic/Accidental Releases /Total

2830010000 Catastrophic/Accidental Releases /Transportation Accidents /TotalDocumentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 27



### 3.6 EPA 2020 PROJECTIONS FOR RESIDENTIAL WOOD AND

LIVESTOCK

EPA’s Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS) made available its 20 20

emissions projections associated with its 2005

- based v4 modeling platform . MARAMA

use d the OAQPS emission projection parameters for two area source sectors

– livestock

and residential wood combustion. OAQPS’s methodology and data sources are

summarized below (USEPA 2008a).

OAQPS projected residential wood combustion emissions are based on the expected

increase in the number of low

- emitting wood stoves and the corresponding decrease in

other types of wood stoves. As newer, cleaner woodstoves replace ol der, more polluting

stoves, there will be an overall reduction of emissions from this category. The approach

used by OAQPS was developed as part of a modeling exercise to estimate the expected

benefits of the woodstove changeout program. This methodology uses a combination of

growth and control factor s and is based on activity not pollutant. The growth and control

are accounted for in a single factor for each residential wood SCC (certain SCCs represent

controlled equipment, while other SCCs represent un controlled equipment)

. C ontrol

factors are indirectly incorporated based on which stove is used. The specific assumptions

OAQPS made were:

Fireplaces, SCC=2104008001: increase 1%/y ear;

Old woodstoves, SCC=2104008002, 2104008010, 2104008051: decrease 2% /y ea r ;

New woodstoves, SCC=2104008003, 2104008004, 2104008030, 2104008050,

2104008052 or 2104008053: increase 2%/y ear.

For the general woodstoves and fireplaces category (SCC 2104008000) OAQPS computed

a weighted average distribution based on 19.4% fireplaces, 71.6% old woodstoves, 9.1%

new woodstoves using 2002 Platform emissions for PM2.5. These fractions are based on

the fraction of emissions from these processes in states that did not have the “general

woodstoves and fireplaces” SCC in the 2002 NEI. This approach results in an overall

decrease of 1.056% per year for this source category. Appendix F contains the residential

wood projection data from OAQPS.

OAQPS based growth in emissions from livestock on projections of growth in a nimal

population. Except for dairy cows and turkeys, the animal projection factors are derived

from national

- level animal population projections from the U.S. Department of Agriculture

(USDA) and the Food and Agriculture Policy and Research Institute (FAP RI).Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 28



### For dairy cows and turkeys OAQPS assumed that there would be no growth in emissions.

This assumption was based on an analysis of historical trends in the number of such

animals compared to production rates. While productions rates have increased, th e number

of animals has declined. In particular, the dairy cow population is projected to decrease in

the future as it has for the past few decades; however, milk production is expected to

increase over the same period. Thus, OAQPS does not believe that pr oduction forecasts

provide representative estimates of the future number of cows and turkeys. Therefore,

OAQPS did not use these forecasts for estimating future

- year emissions from these

animals. Note that the ammonia emissions from dairies are related to both animal

population and nitrogen excretion. Appendix G contains the livestock projection data from

OAQPS.

3.7 SCC, SIC, NAICS AND GROWTH PARAMETER CROSSWALK

Since the employment projections were based on 3

- digit NAICS code, it was necessary to

map NAIC S codes to SCCs and SIC codes that were used by states. Employment

projections at the more specific 4

- digit or 6

- digit NAICS codes were not available.

The first step for developing a comprehensive crosswalk between the different source

classification cod es (SCC, SIC, and NAICS codes) and emission activity growth indicators

was to compile a complete list of the NAICS codes in the 2007 point source inventory

.

Some states use the SIC code while other use the NAICS code. Still other states use both

the SIC and NAICS codes. When the NAICS code was not available SIC codes were

converted to NAICS codes. The 6

- digit NAICS code was truncated to a 3

- digit code,

which represents major industry subsectors of the economy. A U.S. Census Bureau

document was used to perform this conversion (CENSUS 2000).

The next step was to review parameters that could be used as the emission activity growth

indicator for each SCC or NAICS. We initially relied on two USEPA crosswalks (USEPA

2004a, USEPA 2004b) to match area and no nEGU point source SCCs to AEO2010

categories, employment NAICS codes, and population. The sector specific spreadsheets

identif y the growth parameter used to project emissions for each SCC

.

3.8 FINAL GROWTH FACTORS FOR NONEGU / AREA SOURCES

The previous secti on described the growth factors initially recommended to p roject future

year emissions inventories for area and non

- EGU sources. Draft growth and control

factors, and a draft technical support document, were circulated for review by MARAMA

and state agenc ies. During the review, it was noted that several emissions categories showDocumentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 29



### negative growth into the future, particularly categories related to fossil fuel combustion

and manufacturing employment.

Many of the growth factors used to project emissions for area and non

- EGU sources were

based on the AEO2010 fuel consumption forecasts and state

- level employment projections.

The AEO2010 forecasts show declining trends for many fuel consumption sectors,

especially industrial, residential, and commercial distil late fuel oil use. Similarly, the

employment projections show declines in the predicted number of employees for many

sectors of the economy. This is particularly true for the manufacturing sector, which is of

interest because this sector is often associa ted with higher emissions than those for other

sectors. By contrast, the employment projections show increasing trends in retail and

service

- related sectors. However, these sectors are not typically associated with

significant emissions.

Predicted decli nes in fuel use and employment resulted in growth factors less than unity

(i.e., represent negative growth) for many area and non

- EGU point source categories.

Consequently, for some categories, emissions are lower for the projected future years than

for t he base year, even before the application of control assumptions (i.e. the future

"growth only" emissions are lower than the base year emissions). The MARAMA

emissions inventory workgroup met on several occasions via conference calls and email

exchanges t o discuss whether the negative growth projections were realistic, and what

additional assumptions should be made. A topic of particular concern is negative growth

for non

- EGU point sources versus the treatment of Emissions Reduction Credits (ERCs) in

the future year inventories (see Section 3.9 for a discussion of how ERCs were handled).

One conclusion the workgroup reached is that growth methods and assumptions for area

sources and non

- EGUs should be as consistent as possible with those that are being us ed

by the Eastern Regional Technical Advisory Committee (ERTAC) for the projection of

emissions from EGUs. ERTAC is using AEO2010 as a starting point for estimating

projected future year emissions, and their preliminary analysis shows some indications of

negative growth. But their analysis is still on

- going, and it is too early in the process to

draw firm conclusions or make solid recommendations at this time regarding their work

and its relationship to the area and non

- EGU projections.

A few state s cited the importance of the negative growth issue for non

- EGUs and how it

relates to their ERC programs which are critical to new businesses being able to locate in

those states. Because businesses could apply for and sell ERCs at the level of the base

year in ventory, it would not be realistic to show negative growth for non

- EGU point

sources. During an economic downturn, a facility could shut down and sell its ERCs,Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 30



### making the effective level of future year emissions equal to (i.e. no lower than) the base

yea r. Therefore, a recommended conservative approach for addressing negative growth for

non

- EGU point sources is to set a minimum growth rate of 1 (no growth).

During the July 23, 2010 conference call held to discuss the negative growth issue, state

and agen cy representatives on the call were polled as to whether or not they felt that the

current set of proposed growth factors

- including the negative growth factors

- were

realistic for their state or district. In reply, some representatives mentioned that t hey have

observed historic state

- specific data that supports the trends displayed by the proposed

growth factors. Other representatives mentioned that they feel comfortable with the

growth factors and don't have a technical basis to change them or suggest others.

As a result of these discussions, each state provided guidance on how to handle projections

when negative growth is indicated. Exhibit 3.10 shows the state recommendations for

nonEGU point source, and Exhibit 3.11 shows the state recommendation s for area sources.

The sector specific spreadsheets identif y the growth parameter used to project emissions

for each SCC.

3.9 EMISSION REDUCTION CREDITS

Mulitple states (Connecticut, Maryland, Massachesetts, New Hampshire and New Jersey)

added county level r ecords account for account emission reduction credits (ERCs) issued

to stationary sources pursuant to state regulation s

. States provided ERCs on a county

- by

county basis. Fictitious facilities with an identifier of “OFFSET99999” were created for

each county using SCC 23

- 99

- 000

- 000 (miscellaneous industrial processes: not elsewhere

classified). Stack data were developed tha t assumed that emissions were released at the

county centroid with an assumed release height of 10 feet. For the 2017 and 2020

inventories, ERC emissions were set to the amount of banked emissions available in 2007.

Delaware included the banked credits at the specific locations that they were generated

.

V irginia do es not have a formal banking and trading program . Virginia used growth rates

of 1 for those SCCs in the point source emissions inventory that showed a negative growth

.

In addition, for units that have or are projected to have shut down , Virginia preserve d the

2007 emissions in the inventory to account for potential use as offsets or credits.

Other states did not provide any additional information on how to account for ERCs.Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 31



### Exhibit 3.10 S tate Recomm e ndations to Address Negative Growth

for the NonEGU Point Source Sector

State AEO Growth Factors Employment Growth Factors

CT Use no growth (growth factor=1) when AEO

growth is negative; otherwise use AEO2010 if

positive growth Use state DOL employment projections by 3

- digit NAICS

DE Use AEO2010 growth rates For 2013, use state DOL employment

projections by 3

- digit NAICS;

For 2017 and 2020, use no growth (growth

factor=1) when employment growth is

negative; otherwise use employment if

positive growth

DC Use AEO2010 growth rates Use 2008

- 2018 employment projections; use no growth (growth factor=1) when

employment growth is negative; otherwise use

employment if positive growth

ME Use AEO2010 growth rates Use state DOL employment project ions by 3

- digit NAICS

MD Do not use AEO growth factors

Use MD DOL employment projections for

industrial and commercial fuel use SCCs,

unless employment growth rate is negative, in

which case use no growth (growth factor=1) Use updated state DOL employment

projections by 3

- digit NAICS;

For DoD facilities, account for impacts of Base

Realignment and Closure;

For source that have closed, account for

emission reduction credits

MA Use AEO2010 growth rates Use state DOL employment projections by 3

- digit NAICS

NH Use AEO2010 growth rates Use state DOL employment projections by 3

- digit NAICS

NJ New Jersey submitted state specific growth

factors. Used either state specific growth

factors, no growth (growth factor=1) when

state AEO growth is negative or AEO if

positive growth NJ submitted state specific growth factors.

Use d either state specific factors, no growth

(growth factor=1) when state DOL

employment growth is negative or
employment if positive growth

NY Use no growth (growt h factor=1) when AEO

growth is negative; otherwise use AEO2010 if

positive growth Use no growth (growth factor=1) when

employment growth is negative; otherwise use

employment if positive growth

PA Use no growth (growth factor=1) when AEO

growth is negativ e; otherwise use AEO2010 if

positive growth Use no growth (growth factor=1) when

employment growth is negative; otherwise use

employment if positive growth

RI Use AEO2010 growth rates Use state DOL employment projections by 3

- digit NAICS

VT Use AEO2010 growth rates Use state DOL employment projections by 3

- digit NAICS

VA Use no growth (growth factor=1) when AEO

growth is negative; otherwise use AEO2010 if

positive growth Use no growth (growth factor=1) when

employment growth is negative; otherwise use

employment if positive growthDocumentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 32



### Exhibit 3.11 State Recommendations to Address Negative Growth

and Other Growth Factors for the Area Source Sector

State AEO Growth Factors Employment

Growth Factors Population

Growth Factors

CT Use AEO2010 growth rates Use state DOL employment

projections by 3

- digit NAICS Use county

- level

population projections

DE Use AEO2010 growth rates ; no growth for suspect AEO2010

projection for commercial /

institutional residual oil For 2013, use state DOL

employment projections by 3

- digit

NAICS; For 2017 and 2020, use

no growth (growth factor=1) when

employment growth is negative;

otherwise use employment if

positive growth Use county

- level

population projections

DC Use AEO2010 growth rates ; no

growt h for suspect AEO2010

projection for commercial /

institutional residual oil Use DOL employment growth for

NAICS 722 for food and kindred

product SCC; otherwise use

orginial estimates For dry cleaning, use

employment growth for

NAICS 812 instead of

populat ion

ME Use AEO2010 growth rates Use state DOL employment

projections by 3

- digit NAICS Use county

- level

population projections

MD Not using AEO2010 ; used

employment for commercial &

institurional fuel; used housing

units for residential fuel Provided updated employment

projections; changed xwalk

between NAICS code and SCC

for selected source categories Provided updated

population projections

by county

MA Use AEO2010 growth rates Use state DOL employment

projections by 3

- digit NAICS Use county

- level

po pulation projections

NH Use AEO2010 growth rates Use state DOL employment

projections by 3

- digit NAICS Use county

- level

population projections

NJ NJ submitted state specific

growth factors. For fuel

combustion categories only,

used AEO2011 growth rates

except for residual oil (use no

growth) NJ submitted state specific

growth factors. NJ submitted state

specific growth factors

and provided

population projections

by county

NY Use AEO2010 growth rates Use state DOL employment

projections by 3

- digit NAICS Use county

- level

population projections

PA Use AEO2010 growth rates Use state DOL employment

projections by 3

- digit NAICS Use county

- level

population projections

RI Use AEO2010 growth rates Use state DOL employment

projections by 3

- digit NAICS Use county

- level

population projections

VT Use AEO2010 growth rates Use state DOL employment

projections by 3

- digit NAICS Use county

- level

population projections

VA Use AEO2010 growth rates ; no growth for suspect AEO2010

projection for commercial /

institutional residual oil Use state DOL employment

projections by 3

- digit NAICS Use county

- level

population projectionsDocumentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 33



## 4.0 A REA SOURCE CONTROL FACTORS

Control factors were developed to estimate post

- 2007 emission reductions resulting from

on

- the

- books reg ulations and proposed regulations / actions. Control factors were

developed for the following national and regional measures:

Federal Rules Affecting Area Sources

Federal MACT Rules

Control Technique Guidelines

OTC M odel Rules

These control programs are discussed in the following subsections. The control factors

used for area sources are provided in V3_3 Area_07_17_20.xlsx

4.1 F EDERAL RULES AFFECTING AREA SOURCES

USEPA made available its 2020 emissions projections associated with its 2005

- based v4

modeling platform (USEPA 2010b). USEPA accounted for control strategies for four area

source categories. These categories, and their treatment in the emission projection

invento ries, are described below:

Woodstoves

- As noted in Section 3.6, USEPA developed projection factors to

account for the replacement of retired woodstoves that emit at pre

- new source

performance standard (NSPS) levels with lower

- emitting woodstoves . We us ed

USEPA ’s latest methodology which uses a combination growth and control factor

and is based on activity and not pollutant. The growth and control are accounted

for in a single factor for specific SCCs that account for the turnover from pre

- NSPS

to post

- NSPS woodstove.

Landfills : USEPA estimated a 75% reduction in VOC emissions from m unicipal

solid w aste l andfills . However, since the compliance date for this standard was

January 2004, no post

- 2007 reductions were applied to the MANE

- VU+VA

projection in ventory since the emission reductions from this MACT standard

should be reflected in the 2007 inventory and not as an additional post

- 2007 credit.

Vehicle Refueling ( Stage II ): VOC emission s from the gasoline Stage II (vehicle

refueling) are affected by two emission control programs. Many areas in the region

have Stage II vapor recovery rules that were in effect prior to 2007 that require the

capture of gasoline vapors generated when a motor vehicle fuel tank is filled at a

gasoline stati on. The vapors are transferred from the fuel tank in the vehicle to the

storage tank at the station as the vehicle fuel tank is filled. Beginning with the

1998 model year, USEPA e stablished a phase

- in schedule requiring vehicles toDocumentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 34



### incorporate on

- board eq uipment to capture the gasoline vapor emissions from

refueling. These controls, referred to as on

- board refueling vapor recovery

(ORVR), have been required on the vast majority of gasoline powered motor

vehicles since the 2006 model year. VOC emissions f or 2020 from vehicle

refueling were estimated by NESCAUM using the MOVES model

(NESCAUM2011). VOC emissions for 2017 were estimated by interpolating

between the MOVES 2007 and 2020 results. Appendix H contains the VOC control

efficiencies by county used i n the MOVES modeling for displacement losses and

for spillage losses.

Portable fuel containers (PFCs) : VOC emissions from PFCs will be reduced due to

the federal regulation controlling air toxic emissions from mobile sources

promulgated in 2007. Most nor theastern and mid

- Atlantic state s ha d already

adopted similar regulations prior to the federal rule. Refer to the OTC 2006 model

rules subsection later in this document (Section 4.4.6) for a discussion of the

approach for accounting for VOC emission reduc tions from PFCs.

4.2 F EDERAL MACT RULES

USEPA developed guidance for e stimating VOC and NOx e mission c hanges from MACT

Rules (USEPA 2007b). We reviewed the guidance to identify possible area source

controls associated with the federal maximum achievable cont rol technology (MACT)

standards for controlling hazardous air pollutants (HAPs). Although designed to reduce

HAPs, many of the MACT standards also provide a reduction in criteria air pollutants.

The USEPA document provides an estimate of the percent redu ction in VOC and NOx

from each standard, and the compliance date for the standard. Th is information was used

to determine whether the MACT standard provided post

- 2007 emission reductions. For

example, if a compliance period of a MACT standard was 2007 or earlier, then we

assumed that the emission reductions from the MACT standard should be reflected in the

baseline year and not as an additional post

- 2007 credit.

Only one area source category was listed in the USEPA guidance document

- m unicipal

solid w aste l andfills . Since the compliance date for this standard was January 2004, no

post

- 2007 reductions were applied since the emission reductions from the MACT standard

should be reflected in the 2007 inventory and not as an additional post

- 2007 credit.

USEPA has or will soon develop MACT standards for about 70 area source categories.

We reviewed USEPA’s 2020 emissions projections described in the previous section and

found that USEPA did not include emission reductions from recent area source MACT

stand ards. We conducted a review of USEPA’s air toxic website and found that USEPADocumentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 35



### determined that many area source MACT standards would result in nationwide reductions

in criteria air pollutants in addition to the reductions in HAP emissions. However, many

s tate s in the MANE

- VU+VA region already have emission standards for many categories

that are as stringent as the Federal area source MACT standards. For example, many state s

in the MANE

- VU+VA region already have requirements as stringent as the Gasoline

Di stribution MACT and GACT (generally achievable control technology) standards, and

little additional VOC reductions would be realized in the region. Given the resources

allocated to this project, it was beyond the scope to conduct an analysis of the area source

MACT requirements and state

- by

- state emission regulations to determine whether there

would be emission reductions resulting from the area source MACT standards.

The only exception to the above discussion of area source MACT standards pertains to the

recently promulgated rules for reciprocating internal combustion engines (RICE). USEPA

made available an estimate of the percent reduction in emissions attributable to the RICE

MACT rule in 2012 and 2014 (USEPA 2010c). The USEPA 2 014 estimates shown in

Exhibit 4 .1 were used for the MANE

- VU+VA 2017 and 2020 inventories.

4.3 R ECENT CONTROL TECHNIQUE GUIDELINES

Control Techniques Guidelines (CTGs) are documents issued by USEPA to provide state s

with recommendation on VOC control s from a specific product or source category in an

oz one nonattainment area. USEPA issued new or updated CTGs for 13 VOC categories in

3 groups during 2006, 2007 and 2008 (USEPA 2008b). The categories are:

2006 CTGs

 Flat Wood Paneling Coatings

 Industrial Cleaning Solvents

 Flexible Package

, Lithographic and Letterpress Printing

2007 CTGs

 Large Appliance Surface Coating

 Metal Furniture Coatings

 Paper Film and Foil Coatings

2008 CTGs

 Miscellaneous Metal Parts Coatings

 Plastic Parts Coatings

 Auto and Light

- duty Truck Assembly Coatings

 Fiberglass Boat Manufacturing

 Miscellaneous Industrial Adhesives

States indicated that they expected very littleadditional reductions from these new or

amended CTGs. Therefore, no emission reductions were included in the inventory.Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 36



### Exhibit 4

. 1 USEPA Es timated Percent Reductions for RICE MACT Standard by 2014

SCC CO NOx PM10 PM2.5 VOC SCC Description

2101004000 12.42 7.57 7.57 30.85 Electric Utility;Distillate Oil;Total: Boilers and IC Engines

2101004002 16.9 11.81 11.81 33.78 Electric Utility;Distillate Oil;All IC Engine Types

2101006000 11.07 7.97 16.71 Electric Utility;Natural Gas;Total: Boilers and IC Engines

2101006002 15.47 9.87 21.24 Electric Utility;Natural Gas;All IC Engine Types

2102004000 12.42 7.57 7.57 30.85 Industrial;Distillate Oil;Total: Boilers and IC Engines

2102006000 11.07 7.97 16.71 Industrial;Natural Gas;Total: Boilers and IC Engines

2102006002 15.47 9.87 21.24 Industrial;Natural Gas;All IC Engine Types

2103004000 12.42 7.57 7.57 30.85 Commercial/Institutional;Distillate Oil;Total: Boilers and IC Engines

2103006000 11.07 7.97 16.71 Commercial/Institutional;Natural Gas;Total: Boilers and IC Engines

2199004000 12.42 7.57 7.57 30.85 Area Source Fuel Combustion;Distillate Oil;Total: Boilers and IC Engines

2199004002 16.9 11.81 11.81 33.78 Area Source Fuel Combustion;Distillate Oil;All IC Engine Types

2199006000 11.07 7.97 16.71 Area Source Fuel Combustion;Natural Gas;Total: Boilers and IC Engines

2310000000 19.86 12.53 23.87 Oil and Gas Production: All Processes;Total: All Processes

2310000220 19.86 12.53 23.87 Oil and Gas Exploration / Production; Drill Rigs

2310000440 19.86 12.53 23.87 Oil and Gas Exploration / Production; Saltwater Disposal Engines

2310001000 19.86 12.53 23.87 Oil and Gas Production: SIC 13; On

- shore;Total: All Processes

2310002000 19.86 12.53 23.87 Oil and Gas Production: SIC 13; Off

- shore;Total: All Processes

2310020000 19.86 12.53 23.87 Oil and Gas Production: SIC 13;Natural Gas;Total: All Processes

2310020600 19.86 12.53 23.87 Oil and Gas Exploration and Production;Natural Gas;Compressor

Engines

2310023000 19.86 12.53 23.87 Oil and Gas Exploration and Production;Natural Gas;Cbm Gas Well

- Dewatering Pump EnginesDocumentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 37



### 4.4 OTC M ODEL RULES FOR AREA SOURCES

The Ozone Transport Commission (OTC) developed model rules for member states in

2001 for several area source categories: consumer products, architectural and industrial

maintenance (AIM) coatings, portable fuel containers (PFCs), mobile equipment repair and

refinishing, solvent cleaning, and industrial boilers. In 2006 the OTC introduced model

rules for two additional area source categories (adhesives/sealants and asphalt paving),

more stringent requirements for consumer products, portable fuel containers, and industrial

boilers. In 2009/2010, the OTC recommended additional controls for autobody refinishing

operations, consumer products, AIM coatings, and small new natural gas

- fired boilers. In

addition, MANE

- VU states c ommitted to the use of low sulfur home heating, distillate and

residual fuel oil. Exhibit 4

- 2 briefly describes the OTC and MANE

- VU control measures

affecting area sources that have been recommended for adoption by the states in the OTR.

Individual stat es are in various stages of adopting the OTC recommendations into their

rules and SIPs. OTC’s status reports were reviewed to identify each state’ s adoption status

(OTC 2009, OTC 2011a, OTC2011b). To obtain further clarification, states were polled to

de termine whether they have adopted a rule that would achieve reductions equivalent to

the OTC model rule or recommendation and whether credit for each rule was already

accounted for in the 2007 inventory.

To evaluate the impact of the rules currently in p lace as well as the potential adoption of all

control measures by all states except Virginia, the state Air Directors specified that two

emission control scenarios should be developed as follows:

Existing Controls

- this scenario represent s the best esti mate s for the future year

, accounting for all in

- place controls that are fully adopted into federal or individual

state regulations or S IPs

.

Potential New OTC Controls

– this scenario accounts for all of the emission

reductions from the existing control scenario plus new state or regional measures

that are under consideration by the OTC or individual states. This is a “ what if ”

scenario that assumes that all states in the MANE

- VU+VA region except Virginia

will adopt all new OTC control measures under con sideration by 2017. It does

not include any potential new federal control measures that are under consideration.

The following paragraphs describe the control factors applied for each control measure by

state and future year.Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 38



### Exhibit 4.2 Summary of Area Source OTC Control Measures

Source Category Pollutants Description

Consumer Products VOC OTC 2001

. Specified VOC content limits for certain

categories that are more stringent than Federal limits

OTC 2006

. Included additional products and more

restrictive VOC limits for certain products

OTC 2009/2010 . Specified mo re restrictive VOC limits

for 14 existing consumer product categories and three

new categories

Architectural and Industrial

Maintenance Coatings VOC OTC 2001 . Specified VOC content lim its for certain

categories that are more stringent than Federal limits

OTC 2009/2010 . Eliminated 15 categories (replaced

by new categories or deemed unnecessary), added

10 new categories, and specified stricter VOC limits

for 19 categories

Portable Fuel Containers VOC OTC 2001. Provided container design specifications

to reduce emissions from spillage and evaporation

OTC 2006. Revised and clarified design specifications

and added kerosene containers and utility jugs.

Mobile Equipment Repair

and Refinishi ng VOC OTC 2001. Required use of high efficiency coating

application equipment, spray gun cleaning equipment

that minimizes solvent loss, and enclosed spray gun

cleaning.

OTC 2009/2010. L imited the VOC content of coatings

more stringent than the Federal li mits and the VOC

content of cleaning solvents

Solvent Cleaning VOC OTC 2001. Established hardware and operating

requirements for specified vapor cleaning machines,

and solvent volatility limits and operating practices for

cold cleaners

Adhesives and Sealants VOC OTC 2006. Provided VOC content limits and other

restrictions on adhesives used primarily by

commercial and industrial users

.

Asphalt Paving VOC OTC 2006. Suggest ed VOC content limits for

emulsified and cutback asphalts use for road paving

NOx ICI Boiler Controls NOx OTC 2001. Recommend ed NOx emission rate limits

for industrial boilers greater than 5 mmBtu/hour

OTC 2006. Recommended lower NOx emission rate

limits for industrial, commercial, and institutional

boilers

OTC 2010. Recommended na tional NOx controls for

ICI boilers

Small Natural Gas

- Fired

Boilers NOx OTC 2009/2010. Recommended NOx emission rate

limits for new boilers less than 5 mmBtu/hr

Low Sulfur Fuel Oil SO2 MANE

- VU 2006. Recommends sulfur content limits

for home heating oil, distillate oil, and residual oilDocumentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 39



### 4.4.1 OTC Model Rule for Adhesives/Sealants

VOC emissions in this category are primarily from commercial applications such as floor

covering installation (carpet and wood flooring), roof installations and repair and

upholstery shops. The category also includes industrial applications such as wood product

manufacturers. Adhesives in small containers are not included in this category but are

regulated under the consumer products regulations.

The OTC 2006 model rule for indust rial adhesives and sealants is based on the reasonably

available control technology (RACT) and best available retrofit control technology

(BARCT) determination by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) developed in

1998. The OTC model rule regulates th e application of adhesives, sealants, adhesive

primers and sealant primers by providing options for appliers to either use a product with a

VOC content equal to or less than a specified limit or to use add

- on controls to achieve an

equivalent reduction. T he emission reduction benefit estimation methodology for area

sources is based on information developed and used by CARB as discussed in their 1998

RACT report. A 64.4 percent reduction in VOC emissions was estimated for SCC 24

- 40

-

020

- 000.

States were p olled to determine whether they have adopted a rule that would achieve

reductions equivalent to the 2006 OTC recommendations and whether the estimated

reduction in VOC emissions should be applied in 2017 and 2020 . State

- by

- state

recommendations are shown in Exhibit 4.3

.

It should be noted that not all states account for emissions from this category in a separate

area source inventory. Some states, based on information received from USEPA, excluded

this category because the emissions to some extent may be accounted for in the area source

commercial and consumer products category or in the nonEGU point source inventory.

Exhibit 4.3 State Recommendations for OTC Industrial Adhesives/Sealants Rule

State Is Rule

Accounted

for in 2007

Inventory * Incremental VOC Reduction to Apply :

2017

Existing

Controls 2017

Potential

Controls 2020

Existing

Controls 2020

Potential

Controls

CT No 64.4 0 64.4 0

DE No 64.4 0 64.4 0

DC No n/a n/a n/a n/a

ME No 64.4 0 64.4 0

MD No 64.4 0 64.4 0Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 40

State Is Rule

Accounted

for in 2007

Inventory * Incremental VOC Reduction to Apply :

2017

Existing

Controls 2017

Potential

Controls 2020

Existing

Controls 2020

Potential

Controls

MA No 64.4 0 64.4 0

NH No n/a n/a n/a n/a

NJ No 64.4 0 64.4 0

NY No 64.4 0 64.4 0

PA No 64.4 0 64.4 0

RI No n/a n/a n/a n/a

VT n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

VA No n/a n/a n/a n/a

* n/a mean s SCC 24

- 40

- 020

- 000 not included in 2007 inventory ; see text for further discussion



### 4.4.2 OTC Model Rule s for Architectural and Industrial Maintenance Coatings

On August 14, 1998, USEPA issued the final version of their National Volatile Organic

Compound Emission Standards for Architectural Coatings under Section 183(e) of the

Clean Air Act. This final rule applied only to manufacturers and importers of architectural

coatings, and set VOC content limits for 61 coating categories. This rule specifically

allowed states or local governments to adopt more stringent coating limits.

The OTC adopted an AIM mode l rule more stringent than the national rule, and based

primarily on the 2000 CARB s uggested control measure (SCM) for AIM coatings. T he

2001 OTC model rule was estimated to provide a 31 percent incremental reduction in VOC

emissions compared to the Feder al Part 59 rule and was appl ied to the following SCCs:

24

- 01

- 001

- 000 All Architectural Coatings

24

- 01

- 002

- 000 Architectural Coatings Solvent Based

24

- 01

- 003

- 000 Architectural Coatings Water Based

24

- 01

- 008

- 000 Traffic Markings

24

- 01

- 100

- 000 Industrial Maintenance Coatings

24

- 01

- 200

- 000 Other Special Purpose Coatings

The OTC 2009/2010 model rule is an update of the 2001 model rule. It is based the 2007

CARB suggested control measure. The OTC 2009/2010 rule includes new categories

which were defined in the 2007 CARB measure and revised limits for several coatingDocumentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 41



### categories In addition to the revised limits in the 2007 CARB SCM, the OTC model rule

also includes a more stringent VOC limit for the Industrial Maintenance (IM) coating

category that was inclu ded in the 2000 CARB SCM

. The 2000 CARB SCM proposed a

limit of 250 g/L with an optional limit of 340 g/L for colder climates. The 2002 OTC

model rule included the 340 g/l due to concerns about the ability to comply in the colder

northeast. Because of t he success of implementing the revised limit throughout California

and the advent of t

- butyl acetate as a delisted solvent, OTC believes a 250 g/L VOC limit

is now feasible and has included this new lowered limit in the 2010 model rule

.

T he CARB SCM data was used to estimate a 34.4 percent reduction for architectural

coatings and a 9.7 percent reduction for traffic markings. For industrial maintenance

coatings, a 26.5 percent reduction was estimated based on lowering the VOC content limit

from 340 g/L to 250 g/L. Other specialty coatings are another form of industrial high

performance maintenance coatings (IM), so the IM control factor was also used for the

other specialty coatings SCC.

States were polled to determine whether they had adopted a rule tha t would achieve

reductions equivalent to the 2006 OTC recommendations and whether the estimated

reduction in VOC emissions should be applied in 2017 and 2020 . Many state s adopted the

rule prior to 2007 and have already accounted for the reductions attribu table to the rule in

their 2007 inventories. Other state s had compliance dates after 2007 and the effect of the

rule was not accounted for in their 2007 inventory. State

- by

- state recommendations to

account for the AIM rule are shown in Exhibit 4.4

.

Exh ibit 4.4 State Recommendations for OTC AIM Rule

State Is OTC

2001 Rule

Accounted

for in 2007

Inventory * Incremental VOC Percent Reduction to Apply :

2017

Existing

Controls 2017

Potential

Controls 2020

Existing

Controls 2020

Potential

Controls

CT No 31 AIM 34.4 ARCH

9.7 TM

26.5 IM 31 AIM 34.4 ARCH

9.7 TM

26.5 IM

DE Yes 0 AIM 34.4 ARCH

9.7 TM

26.5 IM 0 AIM 34.4 ARCH

9.7 TM

26.5 IM

DC Yes 0 AIM 34.4 ARCH

9.7 TM

26.5 IM 0 AIM 34.4 ARCH

9.7 TM

26.5 IM

ME No 31 AIM 34.4 ARCH

9.7 TM 31 AIM 34.4 ARCH

9.7 TMDocumentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 42

State Is OTC

2001 Rule

Accounted

for in 2007

Inventory * Incremental VOC Percent Reduction to Apply :

2017

Existing

Controls 2017

Potential

Controls 2020

Existing

Controls 2020

Potential

Controls

26.5 IM 26.5 IM

MD Yes 0 AIM 34.4 ARCH

9.7 TM

26.5 IM 0 AIM 34.4 ARCH

9.7 TM

26.5 IM

MA No 31 AIM 34.4 ARCH

9.7 TM

26.5 IM 31 AIM 34.4 ARCH

9.7 TM

26.5 IM

NH No 0 AIM 55.5 ARCH

37.7 TM

49.4 IM 0 AIM 55.5 ARCH

37.7 TM

49.4 IM

NJ Yes 0 AIM 34.4 ARCH

9.7 TM

26.5 IM 0 AIM 34.4 ARCH

9.7 TM

26.5 IM

NY Yes 0 AIM 34.4 ARCH

9.7 TM

26.5 IM 0 AIM 34.4 ARCH

9.7 TM

26.5 IM

PA Yes 0 AIM 34.4 ARCH

9.7 TM

26.5 IM 0 AIM 34.4 ARCH

9.7 TM

26.5 IM

RI No 31 AIM 34.4 ARCH

9.7 TM

26.5 IM 31 AIM 34.4 ARCH

9.7 TM

26.5 IM

VT No 0 AIM 55.5 ARCH

37.7 TM

49.4 IM 0 AIM 55.5 ARCH

37.7 TM

49.4 IM

VA

- NVA Yes 0 AIM 0 AIM 0 AIM 0 AIM

VA

- FRD No 31 AIM 0 AIM 31 AIM 0 AIM

VA

- Other No 0 AIM 0 AIM 0 AIM 0 AIM

AIM

– includes all AIM coatings listed below:

ARCH

– architectural

TM

- traffic markings

IM

- industrial maintenance

VA

- NVA includes the cities/counties in the Northern Virginia emission control area

VA

- FRD includes the cities/counties in the Fredericksburg emission control area

VA

- Other includes cities/counties in Virginia no t listed aboveDocumentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 43



### 4.4.3 OTC Model Rule for Asphalt Paving

OTC Resolution 06

- 02 recommends that state s establish rules to achieve a 20 percent

reduction in VOC emissions from the application and use of emulsified and cutback

asphalt

. The reductions apply to the f ollowing SCCs:

24

- 61

- 021

- 000 Cutback Asphalt

24

- 61

- 022

- 000 Emulsified Asphalt

States were polled to determine whether they have adopted a rule that would achieve

reductions equivalent to the 2006 OTC recommendations and whether the estimated

reduction in V OC emissions should be applied in 2017 and 2020

. Some state s adopted the

rule prior to 2007 and have already accounted for the reductions attributable to the rule in

their 2007 inventories. Other state s had compliance dates after 2007 and the effect of t he

rule was not accounted for in their 2007 inventory. State recommendations to account for

the asphalt paving recommen d ation are shown in Exhibit 4.5

.

Exhibit 4.5 State Recommendations for OTC Cutback and Emulsified

Asphalt Paving Recommendation

State Is Rule

Accounted

for in 2007

Inventory * Incremental VOC Percent Reduction to Apply :

2017

Existing

Controls 2017

Potential

Controls 2020

Existing

Controls 2020

Potential

Controls

CT No 20 0 20 0

DE Yes 0 0 0 0

DC No 0 20 0 20

ME No emissions

in inventory 0 0 0 0

MD No 0 20 0 20

MA No 20 0 20 0

NH No 0 20 0 20

NJ No 56% Cutback

25% Emulsified 0 56% Cutback

25% Emulsified 0

NY No 20 0 20 0

PA No 0 20 0 20

RI No 20 0 20 0

VT No emissions

in inventory 0 0 0 0

VA

- NVA No 0 0 0 0

VA

- Other No 0 0 0 0Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 44



### 4.4.4 OTC Model Rule s for Consumer Products

Several states began regulating the VOC content of consumer products in the early 1990s.

The USEPA promulgated a national rule in 1998 (40CFR, Part 59, Subpart C). Both the

California Air Resources Board (CARB) and the OTC states have periodically update d

their state rules to obtain VOC reductions beyond those required by the federal rule.

Following the lead of CARB, the OTC 2001 model rule for consumer products adopted

more stringent VOC content limits for certain categories. The OTC 2006 model rule

mo dified the OTC 2001 model rule based on amendments adopted by CARB in July 2005

to include additional products and more stringent VOC limits for certain products

. CARB

amended their rules again in 2006 and the OTC 2010 model rule is based on those

amendme nts.

The OTC 2010 model amendments have more restrictive VOC limits for 14 existing

consumer product categories (15 including subcategories) and three new categories (five

including subcategories) will be regulated for the first time with VOC limits. The OTC

2010 model rule a mendments also clarif y or modif

y previously defined or regulated

categories. The model rules also contained optional prohibition s on the use of chlorinated

toxic compounds in certain consumer product categories . CARB adopted these p rovisions

simultaneous with their VOC limits to address the use of non

- VOC chlorinated solvent use

increasing as they are used as replacement compounds.

The VOC percentage reduction from the various rules and amendments are summarized in

Exhibit 4.6. The emissions reductions from the latest OTC consumer products rule update

used information developed by CARB for its 2006 amendments . T he OTC estimated a 4.8

percent reduction of the total consumer products inventory for states that included CARB’s

ban of c hlorinated toxic compounds in brake cleaners, and an estimated 3.3 percent

reduction of the total consumer products inventory for states that did not include this ban.

States reported VOC emissions from consumer products inventory in two different

manners

– using an aggregated SCC or subcategory SCCs, as follows:

Aggregated SCC: 24

- 60

- 000

- 000 Consumer Products, All Products

24

- 65

- 000

- 000 Consumer Products, All Products

Disaggregated SCCs: 24

- 60

- 100

- 000 Consumer Products, Personal Care Products

24

- 60

- 200

- 00 0 Consumer Products, Household Products

24

- 60

- 400

- 000 Consumer Products, Auto Aftermarket Products

24

- 60

- 500

- 000 Consumer Products, Coatings

24

- 60

- 600

- 000 Consumer Products, Adhesives and Sealants

24

- 60

- 800

- 000 Consumer Products, FIFRA Products

24

- 60

- 900

- 0 00 Consumer Products, Misc. ProductsDocumentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 45



### Exhibit 4.6 VOC Emission Factors for Consumer Products

Uncontrolled Emission Factor:

= 7.84 lbs/capita

Emission Factor after 1998 Federal Rule:

= 7.06 lbs/capita

Percent Reduction from 1998 Federal Rule

compared to uncontrolled =

= 100%* (7.84

- 7.06) / 7.84

9.95%

Emission Factor after 2001 OTC Rule

= 6.06 lbs/capita

Percent Reduction from 2001 OTC Rule compared

to Federal Rule =

= 100%* (7.06

- 6.06) / 7.06

14.2%

Emission Factor after 2006 OTC Rule

= 5.94 lbs/capita

Percent Reduction from 2006 OTC Rule compared

to OTC 2001 Rule =

= 100%* (6.06

- 5.94) / 6.06

2.0%

Emission Factor after 2010 OTC Rule

(without brake cleaner chlorinated toxic ban) = 5.745 lbs/capita

Percent Reduction from 2010 OTC Rule compared

to OTC 2006 Rule =

= 100%* (5.94

– 5.745) / 5.94

3.3%

Emission Factor after 2010 OTC Rule

(with brake cleaner chlorinated toxic ban) = 5.655 lbs/capita

Percent Reduction from 2010 OTC Rule compared

to OTC 2006 Rule =

= 100%* (5.94

– 5.655) / 5.94

4.8%



### The reductions shown above were applied to the above SCCs based on each state ’s

adoption of the various rules and amendments as well as the decision with respect to the

ban on chlorinated toxic compounds used in brake cleaners. States were polled to

determine whether they have adopted a rule that would achieve reductions equivalent to

the OTC 2006 recommendations and whether the estimated reduction in VOC emissions

should be applied in 2017 and 2020 . For the 2001 OTC rule, some state s adopt ed the rule

prior to 2007 and have already accounted for the reductions attributable to the OTC 2001

rule in their 2007 inventories. Other state s had compliance dates after 2007 and the effect

of the OTC 2001 rule was not accounted for in their 2007 inven tory. None of the state s

have accounted for the OTC 2006 rule in their 2007 inventories. State

- by

- state

recommendations to account for both the OTC 2001 and 2006 consumer products rules are

shown in Exhibit 4.7

.Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 46



### Exhibit 4.7 State Recommendations for OT C 2001 and 2006

Consumer Products Rule s

State Is 2001 Rule

Accounted

for in 2007

Inventory Is 2006 Rule

Accounted

for in 2007

Inventory VOC Percent Reduction to use in:

2017

Existing

Controls 2017

Potential

Controls 2020

Existing

Controls 2020

Potential

Controls

CT No No 15.9 4.8 15.9 4.8

DE Yes No 2.0 4.8 2.0 4.8

DC No No 2.0 4.8 2.0 4.8

ME No No 15.9 4.8 15.9 4.8

MD Yes No 2.0 4.8 2.0 4.8

MA No No 15.9 4.8 15.9 4.8

NH No No 14.2 5.2 14.2 5.2

NJ Yes No 2.0 4.8 2.0 4.8

NY Yes No 2.0 4.8 2.0 4.8

PA Yes No 2.0 4.8 2.0 4.8

RI No No 15.9 4.8 15.9 4.8

VT No No 0 18.6 0 18.6

VA

- NVA Yes No 2.0 0 2.0 0

VA

- FRD No No 15.9 0 15.9 0

VA

- RCH No No 15.9 0 15.9 0

VA

- Other No No 0 0 0 0

NH indicated that their amendments to include the OTC 2006 recommendations

won’t be completed in time to include in the OTB/OTW inventory



### 4.4.5 OTC Model Rule s for Mobile Equipment Repair and Refinishing

The USEPA promulgated a national rule in 1998 (40CFR, Part 59, Subpart B) to limit the

VOC content of coatings used i n the refinishing of automobiles. The federal standards

w ere estimated to reduce nationwide emissions of VOC by about 37 percent compared to

uncontrolled 1998 emissions. The 2002 OTC model rule established requirements for

using higher efficiency coating application equipment, such as high volume

- low pressure

paint guns, using spray gun cleaning equipment that minimizes solvent loss, and enclosed

spray gun cleaning. The Federal VOC limits on the paints was maintained in the model

rule. An incremental co ntrol effectiveness of 38 percent was estimated for the OTC 2001

model rule (post

- 1998 federal standard emissions).Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 47



### The 2009 OTC model rule for Motor Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Non

- assembly Line

Coating Operations (2009 OTC MVME model rule) seeks to li mit the VOC content in

coatings and cleaning solvents used in motor vehicle and mobile equipment non

- assembly

line coating operations. The 2009 OTC MVME model rule is an update of the 2002 OTC

MERR model rule. The OTC developed the 2009 OTC MVME Model Ru le using the

CARB 2005 Suggested Control Measure (SCM) for Automotive Coatings as a guideline.

The CARB 2005 SCM estimated a 65 percent reduction in VOC emissions from 2002

CARB baseline emissions, which are post

- 1998 federal standard emissions. Similar

reductions of 65 percent are expected from implementation of the 2009 OTC MVME

Model Rule.

A few OTC states adopted the 2002 OTC model rule and accounted for the 38 percent

reduction in the 2007 MANEVU+VA inventory. Other states adopted the 2002 OTC

mod el rules after 2007, so the reduction was not included in 2007 but was included in the

2017/2020 “on

- the

- books” inventory. Still other states have not yet adopted the 2002 OTC

model rule. Exhibit 4.8 summarizes the percent reductions that will be applied based on

the adoption status of each state:

Exhibit 4.8 VOC Emission Reductions for Auto Refinishing

State Rule Adoption Status VOC Reduction:

2017/2020

Existing 2017/2020

Potential

Accounted for 2002 OTC rule in 2007 inventory

Will adopt 2009 OTC rule by 2017 0 % 65 %

Did not account for 2002 OTC rule in 2007 inventory

Did account for 2002 OTC rule in 2017/2020 OTB inventory

Will adopt 2009 OTC rule by 2017 38 % 65 %

Did not account for 2002 OTC rule in 2007 inventory

Did not account for it in 2017/2020 OTB inventory

Will adopt 2009 OTC rule by 2017 0 % 78.3 %



### The reductions have traditionally been applied to the following area source SCCs:

24

- 01

- 005

- 000 Auto Refinishing / All Solvent Types

24

- 01

- 005

- 500 Auto Refinishing / Surface Preparation S olvents

24

- 01

- 005

- 600 Auto Refinishing / Primers

24

- 01

- 005

- 700 Auto Refinishing / Top Coats

24

- 01

- 005

- 800 Auto Refinishing / Clean

- up SolventsDocumentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 48



### States were polled to determine whether they have adopted a rule that would achieve

reductions equivalent to the 2006 OTC recommendations and whether the estimated

reduction in VOC emissions should be applied in 2017 and 2020 . Many state s adopted the

rule prior to 2007 and have already accounted for the reductions attributable to the rule in

their 2007 inventories. Other state s had compliance dates after 2007 and the effect of the

rule was not accounted for in their 2007 inventory. State

- by

- state recomme ndations to

account for the auto refinishing rule are shown in Exhibit 4.9

.

Exhibit 4.9 State Recommendations for OTC Auto Refinishing Rule

State Is OTC

2001 Rule

Accounted

for in 2007

Inventory * Incremental VOC Reduction to Apply :

2017

Existing

Controls 2017

Potential

Controls 2020

Existing

Controls 2020

Potential

Controls

CT Yes 0 65 0 65

DE Yes 0 65 0 65

DC No 38 65 38 65

ME No 38 65 38 65

MD Yes Yes 0 65 0

MA No 0 78.3 0 78.3

NH No 0 78.3 0 78.3

NJ Yes 0 65 0 65

NY Yes 0 65 0 65

PA Yes 0 65 0 65

RI Yes 0 65 0 65

VT No emissions

in inventory 0 0 0 0

VA

- NVA Yes 0 0 0 0

VA

- FRD No 38 0 38 0

VA

- Other No 0 0 0 0Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 49



### 4.4.6 OTC Model Rule s for Portable Fuel Containers

In 2001, the OTC developed a model rule to control VOC emissions from portable fuel

containers. The 2001 model rule was based on the technical work conducted by California

Air Resources Board (CARB) for developing California’s 2000 fuel container rule.

Sev eral, but not all, of the MANEVU+VA state s adopted regulations which became

effective prior to 2007.

After OTC developed its model rule in 2001, CARB realized that its original study and

rule had some defects and decided to conduct further studies and re search on fuel

containers. Based on its new studies, CARB revised its rule twice. In 2006, the OTC

developed a second model rule for PFCs to reflect the CARB revisions. Thereafter,

USEPA developed a federal rule in 2007 which included, among other things

, requirements for portable fuel containers equivalent to OTC’s 2006 requirements.

The federal requirements became effective on January 1, 2009. State s have analyzed the

federal rule and determined that the federal rule has requirements that are essenti ally

equivalent to the OTC 2006 model rule. These new federal requirements will reduce

hydrocarbon emissions from uncontrolled fuel containers by approximately 75 percent

. Assuming a 10

- year turnover to compliant cans, only 10 percent of the existing in ventory

of PFCs will comply with the new requirements in 2010. Therefore, only 10 percent of the

full emission benefit estimated by USEPA will occur by 2010

– the incremental reduction

will be about 7.5 percent in 2010. In 2013, there will be a 40 percen t turnover to compliant

cans, resulting in an incremental reduction of about 60 percent. By 2017, the will be 80

percent penetration to compliant PFCs, resulting in an incremental reduction of 58 percent

in 2018. By 2020, there will be 100 percent penetr ation to compliant PFCs, resulting in an

incremental reduction of 75 percent in 2020.

The reductions apply to the following SCCs:

25

- 01

- 011

- xxx Residential PFCs

24

- 01

- 012

- xxx Commercial PFCs

States were polled to determine the status of PFC regulations in each state . Some state s

have adopted a rule that would achieve reductions equivalent to the 2001 or 2006 OTC

rules. Other state s will rely exclusively on the Federal rule. State

- by

- state

recommendations to account for the OTC and federal PFC rules are s hown in Exhibit 4.10

.Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 50



### Exhibit 4.10 State Recommendations for OTC and Federal

Portable Fuel Container Rule s

State Compliance

Date for

OTC 2001

Rule Compliance

Date for

OTC 2006

Rule Rely on

Federal

Rule? VOC Percent Reduction to use in:

2017

Existing

Controls 2017

Potential

Controls 2020

Existing

Controls 2020

Potential

Controls

CT May 2004 Jun 2008 No 81 0 81 0

DE Jan 2003 Apr 2010 Yes 75 0 78 0

DC Dec 2004 Feb 2012 Yes 79 0 81 0

ME Jan 2004 n/a Yes 77 0 80 0

MD May 2003 Jan 2009 No 76 0 79 0

MA n/a n/a Yes 77 0 85 0

NH n/a Jan 2008 No 85 0 85 0

NJ Jan 2005 Jan 2009 No 8 3 0 83 0

NY Jan 2005 Jan 2010 Yes 79 0 82 0

PA Jan 2005 n/a Yes 75 0 78 0

RI n/a n/a Yes 77 0 85 0

VT n/a n/a Yes 77 0 85 0

VA

- NVA Jan 2005 Aug 2010 Yes 79 0 82 0

VA

- FRD Jan 2008 Aug 2010 Yes 83 0 85 0

VA

- RCH n/a n/a Yes 77 0 85 0

VA

- Oth n/a n/a Yes 77 0 85 0



### 4.4.7 OTC Model Rule for Solvent Cleaning

The OTC model rule establishes hardware and operating requirements for specified vapor

cleaning machines, and solvent volatility limits and operating practices for cold cleaners.

An incremental control effectiveness of 66 percent was estimated for the OTC model rule

relative to the base case. The reductions apply SCCs in the 24

- 15

- xxx

- xxx series

( Degreasing All Industries and Processes ). States were polled to determine whether they

have adopted a rule that would achieve reductions equivalent to the 2001 OTC

recommendations and whether the estimated reduction in VOC emissions should be

applied in 2017 and 2020

. Many state s adopted the rule prior to 2007 and have already

accounted for the reductions attributable to the rule in their 2007 inventories. Other state s

had compliance dates after 2007 and the effect of the rule was not accounted for in their

2007 invent ory. State

- by

- state recommendations to account for the solvent cleaning rule

are shown in Exhibit 4.11

.Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 51



### Exhibit 4.11 State Recommendations for 2001 OTC Solvent Cleaning Rule

State Is Rule

Accounted

for in 2007

Inventory * Incremental VOC Reduction to Apply :

2017

Existing

Controls 2017

Potential

Controls 2020

Existing

Controls 2020

Potential

Controls

CT No 66 0 66 0

DE Yes 0 0 0 0

DC No 66 0 66 0

ME No 66 0 66 0

MD Partially 30 0 30 0

MA No 66 0 66 0

NH No 0 66 0 66

NJ Yes 0 0 0 0

NY Yes 0 0 0 0

PA Yes 0 0 0 0

RI No 66 0 66 0

VT n/a 0 66 0 66

VA

- NVA Yes 0 0 0 0

VA

- Other No 0 0 0 0



### 4.4.8 OTC Model Rule s for ICI Boilers

In Resolution 06

- 02, the OTC Commissioners recommended that OTC member states

pursue as necessary and appropriate state

- specific rulemakings or other implementation

methods to establish emission reduction percentages, emission rates or technologies for ICI

boilers based on guidelines that varied by boiler size and fuel type.

States were polled to determine whether they have adopted a rule that would achieve

reductions equivalent to the 2006 OTC recommendations and whether the estimated

reduction in NOx emissions should be applied in 2017 and 2020 . All but one state

indicate d that they have not adopted rules for area sources equivalent to the 2006 OTC

recommendations. New Jersey specified that they have post

- 2007 ICI boiler rules that

reduce NOx emissions and provided the estimates of the reductions in NOx emissions by

SCC res ulting from boiler tuneup requirements, as shown in Exhibit 4.12:Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 52



### Exhibit 4.12 Area Source Emission Reductions from

New Jersey ICI Boiler NOx Rules

SCC Source Category Percent

Reduction

from

Tuneups

2007

- 201 7 Rule

Effectiveness Rule

Penetration Overall

Percent

Reduction

2007

- 201 7

2102004000 Industrial Distillate 25% 80% 30% 6%

2102005000 Industrial Residual 25% 80% 30% 6%

2102006000 Industrial Natural Gas 25% 80% 30% 6%

2102007000 Industrial LPG 25% 80% 30% 6%

2103004000 Commercial Distillate 25% 80% 30% 6%

2103005000 Commercial Residual 25% 80% 30% 6%

2103006000 Commercial Natural Gas 25% 80% 30% 6%

2103007000 Commercial LPG 25% 80% 30% 6%



### Other states indicated that they will likely depend on USEPA national rule for possible

inclusion in the BOTW inventory. OTC Resolution 10

- 01 (June, 2010) called on USEPA

for national regulations for ICI boilers

. The guidelines from OTC Resolution 06

- 02 shown

in Exhibit 4.13 were used to estimate potential area source NOx reductions for the “what

if” control scenario for all states in the MANE

- VU+VA inventory except New Jersey and

Virginia.

Exhibit 4.1 3 OTC Resolution 06

- 02 Guidelines for ICI Boiler NOx Rules

Boiler Size

(mmBtu/hr) NOx Percent Reduction from Base Emissions by Fuel Type

Natural Gas #2 Fuel Oil #4/#6 Fuel Oil Coal

<25 10 10 10 10

25 to 50 50 50 50 50*

50 to 100 10 10 10 10*

100 to 250 76 40 40 40*

>250 **   ** 

* Resolution 06

- 02 did not specify a percent reduction for coal; for modeling purposes, the same

percent reduction specified for #4/#6 fuel oil was used for coal.

** Resolution 06

- 02 specified the reduction for > 250mmBtu/hour boilers to be the “same as EGUs

of similar size.” The OTC Commissioners have not yet recommended an emission rate or percent

reduction for EGUs. As a result, no reductions for ICI boilers > 250 mmBtu/hour were included in

the potential controls inventory.Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 53



### Since the above guidelines vary by boiler size and fuel type, the specific percent reduction

applied to an area source category depends on the SCC and design capacity of the source.

The SCC identifies the fuel type (for example, SCC 21

- 02

- 004

- xxx describes distillate

o ilfired industrial boilers, S CC 21

- 02

- 006

- xxx describes natural gas

- fired industrial

boilers). The area source inventory does not contain any information on the sizes of the

units included in the inventories. To apportion area source emissions to the boiler size

ranges listed above, we used data from an Oak Ridge National Laboratory study (EEA

2005 ). We used the national estimates of boiler capacity by size range to calculate the

percentage of total boiler capacity in each size range. Since the Oak Ridge report

distinguished between industrial boilers and commercial/inst i tutional boilers, we

developed separate profiles for industrial boilers and for commercial/institutional boilers.

We used these boiler size profiles to calculate weighted average percent reductions

industrial boilers by fuel type and commercial/institutional boilers by fuel type , as follows:

34.5 percent reduction in NOx emissions from industrial boilers, all fuel types

28.1 percent reduction in NOx emissions from commercial/institutional boilers, all

fuel types

Appendix I contains the data used to develop the NOx control factors for area source ICI

boilers.

4.4.9 OTC Model Rule for New, Small, Natural Gas

- fired Boilers

The provisions of this model rule limit NOx emissions from new natural gas

- fired ICI and

residentia l boilers, steam generators, process heaters, and water heaters greater than 75,000

BTUs and less than 5.0 million BTUs. This model rule may be implemented as a

manufacturing restriction, a sales restriction, a use restriction, or a combination of these

r estrictions. Each implementing state agency will choose the entities to regulate after

consideration of the agency’s compliance assurance and enforcement practices and

policies.

The emission limits of this model rule were developed from requirements no w in effect in

certain jurisdictions, including: (1) San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Rule

4308 for boilers, steam generators, process heaters and water heaters with maximum rated

heat input capacity equal to or greater than 75,000 Btu/h r and up to but less than 2.0

million Btu/hr; (2) San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Rule 4307 for gas

fired and liquid fuel

- fired boilers, steam generators, and process heaters with maximum

rated capacity of 2.0 million Btu/hr up to and in cluding 5.0 million Btu/hr; and (3) similar

rules adopted by other California Air Pollution Control Districts and the State of Texas.Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 54



### Since the OTC model rule is based on SJVAPCD Rules 4307 and 4308, one method for

estimating potential NOx reductions for t he OTC states from both Rule 4307 and Rule

4308 is to compare the natural gas usage in the San Joaquin Valley to the natural gas usage

in the OTC states and calculate the proportional NOx reductions.

The SJV 4308 Rule, Final Staff Report estimated NOx reductions of 2.0 annual average

tons per day (730 tons per year), and the 2008 SJV 4307 Rule Proposal estimated NOx

reductions of 1.15 annual average tons per day (420 tons per year). The total reducti on

from both rules was estimated to be 3.15 tons per day (1,150 tons per year) after a 15

- year

period for complete turnover to compliant equipment. These SJV d ata were used to

calculate a ton per year emission reduction , assuming implementation begins in 2014 , as

summarized in Exhibit 4.14 and further documented in Appendix J

.

Ex hibit 4.1 4 NOx Control Factors for the OTC Rule for

New, Small, Natural Gas

- fired Units

State Percent Reduction in NOx

Emissions from Residential and

Commercial Natural Gas Us e

2017 2020

CT 5.0% 8.4%

DE 6.1% 10.1%

DC 2.3% 3.9%

ME 0.0% 0.0%

MD 3.2% 5.4%

MA 5.3% 8.8%

NH 7.1% 11.8%

NJ 3.5% 5.9%

NY 5.1% 8.5%

PA 4.7% 7.8%

RI 7.0% 11.7%

VT 3.1% 5.1%

VA 0 % 0%Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 55



### 4.4.10 MANE

- VU Low Sulfur Fuel Oil Strategy

MANE

- VU developed a low sulfur fuel oil strategy to help states develop Regional Haze

SIP s (MANE_VU 2007). The sulfur in fuel oil recommendations are shown in Exhibit

4. 1 5 and vary by state, type of fuel oil, and year of implementation.

Exhibit 4. 1 5 MAN E

- VU Low Sulfur Fuel Oil Strategy

Inner Zone States (DE, NJ, NY, PA)

Fuel Oil Type Sulfur Content

2012 Sulfur Content

2016

Distillate 500 ppm 15 ppm

#4 Residual 0.25 % 0.25 %

#6 Residual 0.3 to 0.5 % 0.3 to 0.5 %

Outer Zone States (CT, DC, MA, MD

, ME, NH, RI, VT )

Fuel Oil Type Sulfur Content

2014 Sulfur Content

2018

Distillate 500 ppm 15 ppm

#4 Residual n/a 0.25 to 0.5 %

#6 Residual n/a 0.5 %



### Each state was polled and asked to provide guidance as to when, if at all, the MANE

- VU

strategy would be incorporated into their state rules. States were also asked to provide the

2007 sulfur contents for each fuel type by county in order to calculate the percent reduction

in emissions for the future years. Three states (MD, NJ, and NY) have adopted or are

committed to adopting the strategy into their rules. The reductions for these three states

were accounted for in the “existing controls” inventory. A ll other jurisdictions in dicated

that not enough regulatory development progress has been made to include the reductions

in future years with absolute certainty. The potential reductions for these states were

accounted for in the “potential new controls” inventory. One state (VA) has no plans to

adopt the low sulfur fuel oil strategy. The percent reductions by fuel type and county are

contained in Appendix K.Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 56



## 5.0 NONEGU POINT SOURCE CONTROL FACTORS

Control factors were developed to estimate post

- 2007 emiss ion reductions resulting from

on

- the

- books regulations and proposed regulations/actions. Control factors were

considered for the following national and regional measures:

Federal Rules Affecting NonEGU Point Sources

Control Technique Guidelines

OTC Model Rules

These control programs are discussed in the following subsections. The control factors

used for nonEGU point sources are provided in V3_3 NonEGU_07_17_20.xlsx

.

5.1 F EDERAL ACTIONS AFFECTING NONEGU POINT SOURCES

USEPA made available its 2020 emissions projections associated with its 2005

- based v4

modeling platform (USEPA 2010a). These categories, and how they were accounted for in

the MANE

- VU+VA emission projection inventories, are described below:

MACT Standards

- USEPA developed guidance for e stimating VOC and NO

x



### e mission c hanges from MACT Rules (USEPA 2007b). We reviewed the guidance

to identify nonEGU source controls associated with MACT standards for

controlling HAPs. The information concerning MACT compliance per iods was

used to determine whether the MACT standard resulted in post

- 2007 emission

reductions. Because major source categories had a compliance period of 2007 or

earlier, we assumed that the emission reductions from the MACT standard should

be reflected in the baseline year and not as an additional post

- 2007 credit. The

only exception to the above discussion of area source MACT standards pertains to

the recently promulgated rules for reciprocating internal combustion engines

.

USEPA made available an es timate of the percent reduction in emissions

attributable to the RICE MACT rule in 2012 and 2014 (USEPA 2010 b ). These

reductions by SCC are shown in Exhibit 5.1 . The USEPA 2014 estimates were

used for the MANE

- VU+VA 2017, 2020 and 2025 inventories.

Indu strial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters MACT

Standard

- USEPA’ s 2020 control factor file identified a number of solid fuel

burning SCCs for which they estimated an 87% reduction in both PM10 and

PM2.5. These were used for 2025 a lso for the affected SCCs.Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 57



### Exhibit 5.1 USEPA Estimated Percent Reductions for RICE MACT Standard

SCC CO NOx PM10 PM2.5 VOC SCC Description

20100102 20.36 15.14 15.14 36.72 Electric Generation;Distillate Oil (Diesel);Reciprocating

20100105 20.36 15.14 15.14 36.72 Electric Generation;Distillate Oil (Diesel);Reciprocating: Crankcase Blowby

20100107 20.36 15.14 15.14 36.72 Electric Generation;Distillate Oil (Diesel);Reciprocating: Exhaust

20100202 19.86 12.53 23.87 Electric Generation;Natural Gas;Reciprocating

20100207 19.86 12.53 23.87 Electric Generation;Natural Gas;Reciprocating: Exhaust

20200102 20.36 15.14 15.14 36.72 Industrial;Distillate Oil (Diesel);Reciprocating

20200104 20.36 15.14 15.14 36.72 Industrial;Distillate Oil (Diesel);Reciprocating: Cogeneration

20200107 20.36 15.14 15.14 36.72 Industrial;Distillate Oil (Diesel);Reciprocating: Exhaust

20200202 19.86 12.53 23.87 Industrial;Natural Gas;Reciprocating

20200204 19.86 12.53 23.87 Industrial;Natural Gas;Reciprocating: Cogeneration

20200207 19.86 12.53 23.87 Industrial;Natural Gas;Reciprocating: Exhaust

20200253 19.18 37.96 29.74 Industrial;Natural Gas;4

- cycle Rich Burn

20200254 37.85 28.59 Industrial;Natural Gas;4

- cycle Lean Burn

20200256 37.85 28.59 Industrial;Natural Gas;4

- cycle Clean Burn

20200301 19.18 37.96 29.74 Industrial;Gasoline;Reciprocating

20200307 19.18 37.96 29.74 Industrial;Gasoline;Reciprocating: Exhaust

20201001 19.86 12.53 23.87 Industrial;Liquified Petroleum Gas (LPG);Propane

20201002 19.86 12.53 23.87 Industrial;Liquified Petroleum Gas (LPG);Butane

20201702 19.18 37.96 29.74 Industrial;Gasoline;Reciprocating Engine

20201707 19.18 37.96 29.74 Industrial;Gasoline;Reciprocating: Exhaust

20300101 20.36 15.14 15.14 36.72 Commercial/Institutional;Distillate Oil (Diesel);Reciprocating

20300105 20.36 15.14 15.14 36.72 Commercial/Institutional;Distillate Oil (Diesel);Reciprocating: Crankcase Blowby

20300106 20.36 15.14 15.14 36.72 Commercial/Institutional;Distillate Oil (Diesel);Reciprocating: Evaporative Losses

20300107 20.36 15.14 15.14 36.72 Commercial/Institutional;Distillate Oil (Diesel);Reciprocating: Exhaust

20300201 19.86 12.53 23.87 Commercial/Institutional;Natural Gas;ReciprocatingDocumentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 58

SCC CO NOx PM10 PM2.5 VOC SCC Description

20300204 19.86 12.53 23.87 Commercial/Institutional;Natural Gas;Cogeneration

20300207 19.86 12.53 23.87 Commercial/Institutional;Natural Gas;Reciprocating: Exhaust

20300301 19.18 37.96 29.74 Commercial/Institutional;Gasoline;Reciprocating

20300307 19.18 37.96 29.74 Commercial/Institutional;Gasoline;Reciprocating: Exhaust

20301001 19.86 12.53 23.87 Commercial/Institutional;Liquified Petroleum Gas (LPG);Propane

20301002 19.86 12.53 23.87 Commercial/Institutional;Liquified Petroleum Gas (LPG);Butane

20400401 19.18 37.96 29.74 Engine Testing;Reciprocating Engine;Gasoline

20400402 20.36 15.14 15.14 36.72 Engine Testing;Reciprocating Engine;Diesel/Kerosene

20400403 20.36 15.14 15.14 36.72 Engine Testing;Reciprocating Engine;Distillate Oil: CI: CI: VOC 2005cr = 0

31000203 19.86 12.53 23.87 Oil and Gas Production;Natural Gas Production;Compressors

50100421 19.86 12.53 23.87 Solid Waste Disposal;Landfill Dump;Waste Gas Recovery: Internal Combustion

DeviceDocumentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 59



### Petroleum refinery enforcement settlements

- For the facilities identified by

USEPA located in New Jersey and Pennsylvania we applied post

- 2007 estimated

reductions for NO

x 

### , PM10, PM2.5, and SO 2 

### to affected units.

5.2 R ECENT CONTROL TECHNIQUE GUIDELINES

Control Techniques Guidelines (CTGs) are docu ments issued by USEPA to provide state s

with the USEPA ’s recommendation on how to control the emissions of VOC from a

specific type of product or source category in an ozone nonattainment area. USEPA issued

new or updated CTGs for 13 VOC categories in 3 g roups during 2006, 2007 and 2008

(USEPA 2008b). The categories are:

2006 CTGs

 Flat Wood Paneling Coatings

 Industrial Cleaning Solvents

 Flexible Package Printing

 Lithographic Printing

 Letterpress Printing

2007 CTGs

 Large Appliance Surface Coating

 Metal Furniture Coatings

 Paper Film and Foil Coatings

2008 CTGs

 Miscellaneous Metal Parts Coatings

 Plastic Parts Coatings

 Auto and Light

- duty Truck Assembly Coatings

 Fiberglass Boat Manufacturing

 Miscellaneous Industrial Adhesives

States indicated that they exp ected very little additional reductions from these new or

amended CTGs. Therefore, no emission reductions were included in the inventory.

5.3 OTC M ODEL RULES FOR NONEGU s

The OTC developed NOx control measures for industrial, commercial, and institutional

(ICI ) boilers and distributed generation units in 2001 (OTC 2001). We reviewed the

OTC’s status reports to identify state s status in adopting the OTC 2001 model rules (OTC

2009). Most state s have adopted the OTC model rules with compliance dates in 2007 or

earlier. As a result, we assumed that the emission reductions from the 2001 OTC model

rules for nonEGUs are already reflected in the 2007 inventory and no post

- 2007

reductions were appli ed.Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 60



### In 2006

, the OTC introduced model rules (OTC 2007) for one nonEGU VOC source

category (adhesives/sealants) and new/more stringent requirements for several NOx source

categories (asphalt production plants, cement kilns, glass/fiberglass furnaces, and

industrial, commercial, and institutional {ICI} boilers).

These model rules and recommendations provided a consistent framework for air pollution

regulation throughout the region. In addition, MANE

- VU provided recommendations to

require low sulfur home heating, distillate and residul fuel oil. Exhibit 5

- 2 briefly

describes the OTC and MANE

- VU control measures affecting point sources that have been

recommended for adoption by the states in the OTR. Recommendations for EGUs are not

addressed in this sec tion since the projection of EGU emissions is being accomplished by

ERTAC under a separate agreement.

Individual states are in various stages of adopting the OTC recommendations into the rules

and SIPs. We reviewed the OTC’s status reports to identify e ach state’ s adoption status

(OTC 2009, OTC 2011a, OTC2011b). To obtain further clarification, states were polled to

determine whether they have adopted a rule that would achieve reductions equivalent to

the OTC model rule or recommendation and whether cre dit for each rule was already

accounted for in the 2007 inventory.

Not all states have adopted all rules. In order to evaluate the impact of both the rules

currently in place as well as the potential adoption of all control measures by all states, the

s tate Air Directors specified that two emission control scenarios should be developed.

Existing Controls

- this scenario represent s the best estimate s for the future year

, accounting for all in

- place controls that are fully adopted into federal or individ ual

state regulations or SIPs

.

Potential New OTC Controls

– this scenario accounts for all of the emission

reductions from the existing control scenario plus new state or regional measures

that are under consideration by the OTC or individual states. This is a “ what if ”

scenario that assumes that all states in the MANE

- VU+VA region except Virginia

will adopt all new OTC control measures under consideration by 2017. It does not

include any potential new federal control measures that are under considera tion.

The following paragraphs describe the control factors applied for each control measure by

state and future year.Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 61



### Exhibit 5 .2 Summary of Point Source OTC Control Measures

Source Category Pollutants Description

EGUs NOx OTC 2001. Provide d e mission s tandards for

s tationary c ombustion t urbines

, e mergency

g enerators , and l oad s having u nits

.

OTC 2009/2010. Recommended NOx emission rate

limits for oil and gas boilers serving EGUs and

emission rate limits for high energy demand day

combustion turbines.

Asphalt Production Plants NOx OTC 2006. Provided emission rate limits and

recommended a 35% reduction in NOx emissions

.

Cement Kilns NOx OTC 2006. Provided emission rate limits and

recommended a 60% reduction in NOx emissions

.

Glass Furnaces NOx OTC 2006. Provided emission rate limits and

recommended a 85% reduction in NOx emissions

.

ICI Boiler Controls NOx OTC 2001. Recommended NOx emission rate limits

for industrial boilers greater than 5 mmBtu/hour

OTC 2006. Recommended lower NOx emissio n rate

limits for industrial, commercial, and institutional

boilers

OTC 2010. Recommended national NOx controls for

ICI boilers

Low Sulfur Fuel Oil SO2 MANE

- VU 2006. Recommends sulfur content limits

for home heating oil, distillate oil, and residual oil

Adhesives and Sealants VOC OTC 2006. Provided VOC content limits and other

restrictions on adhesives used in industrial and

commercial settings.

Large Petroleum Storage

Tanks VOC OTC 2009/2010. A ddresses high vapor pressure

VOCs, such as gasoline and crude oil, stored in large

aboveground stationary storage tanks, which are

typically located at refineries, terminals and pipeline

breakout stations.Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 62



### 5.3.1 OTC 2006 Model Rule for Adhesives and Sealants

The 2006 OTC model rule is intended to achieve VOC emission reductions from adhesive

application sources. The OTC 2006 model rule for adhesives and sealants is based on the

reasonably available control technology (RACT) and best available retrofit contro l

technology (BARCT) determination by the California Air Resources Board (CARB)

developed in 1998. The emission reduction benefit estimation methodology is based on

information developed and used by CARB for their RACT/BARCT determination in 1998.

The vast majority of the emissions regulated by this rule are in the area source inventory.

For point sources, we first identified those sources applying adhesives and sealants (using

the SCC of 4

- 02

- 007

- xx, adhesives application). Next, we reviewed the 2007 inventory to

determine whether these sources had existing capture and control systems. Most of the

sources did not have control information in the NIF database. However, several sources

reported capture and destruction efficiencies in the 70 to 99 percen t range, with a few

sources reporting capture and destruction efficiencies of 99+ percent. Sources with

existing control systems that exceeded an 85 percent overall capture and destruction

efficiency would comply with the OTC 2006 model rule provision for add

- on air pollution

control equipment; therefore, no additional reductions were calculated for these sources.

For point sources without add

- on control equipment, we used a 64.4 percent reduction

based on the CARB determination.

States were polled to det ermine whether they have adopted a rule that would achieve

reductions equivalent to the 2006 OTC model rule and whether the estimated reduction in

VOC emissions should be applied in 2017 and 2020 . New Hampshire indicated that they

have no existing rule in place and no reductions should be applied. Virginia indicated that

reductions from existing rules only appl y in three regions:

Northern Virginia (Arlington, Alexandria, Manassas, Manassas Park, Prince

William, Loudon, Fairfax, Fairfax City, Falls Church , and Stafford),

Fredericksburg (Fredericksburg and Spotsylvania), and

Richmond (Charles City, Colonial Heights, Chesterfield, Hopewell, Hanover,

Petersburg, Henrico, City of Richmond, and Prince George).

A ll other state s have existing rules in place that will require VOC reductions before 2017.

Exhibit 5.3 shows the reduction that were applied by state under both the existing controls

inventory and the “what if” inventory

.Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 63



### Exhibit 5. 3 State Recommendations for OTC Adhe sives/Sealants Rule

State Is Rule

Accounted

for in 2007

Inventory * Incremental VOC Reduction to Apply :

2017

Existing

Controls 2017

Potential

Controls 2020

Existing

Controls 2020

Potential

Controls

CT No 64.4 0 64.4 0

DE No 64.4 0 64.4 0

DC n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

ME No 64.4 0 64.4 0

MD No 64.4 0 64.4 0

MA No 64.4 0 64.4 0

NH No 0 64.4 0 0 64.4

NJ No 64.4 0 64.4 0

NY No 64.4 0 64.4 0

PA No 64.4 0 64.4 0

RI No 64.4 0 64.4 0

VT n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

VA

- NVA No 64.4 0 64.4 0

VA

- FRD No 64.4 0 64.4 0

VA

- RCH No 64.4 0 64.4 0

VA

- Other No 0 0 0 0

* Some sources in the 2007 inventory had VOC controls greater than 85% and already complied

with the requirements; no incremental reduction was taken for these sources (see text)

n/a

- no affected point sources identified in the inventory



### 5.3.2 OTC 200 9 /20 10 Model Rule for Large Storage Tanks

The OTC model rule addresses high vapor pressure VOCs, such as gasoline and crude oil

, stored in large aboveground stationary storage tanks, which are typically located at

refineries, terminals and pipeline breakout stations. The OTC model rule is based on

recent revisions to New Jersey’s VOC storage tank rules located at N.J.A.C. 7:27

- 16 .2.

The OTC model rules requires: 1) retrofiting floating roof tanks to reduce emissions from

deck fittings; 2) retrofitting external floating roof tanks with domes; 3) controlling roof

landing losses; and 4) adding controls for degassing and interior tan k cleaning. New Jersey

estimated reductions for tanks located in New Jersey would total approximately 2,000 tons

per year by 2020. In making these estimates, New Jersey developed the following VOC

percent reduction estimates for the following categories of storage tanks:Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 64

Tank Location 

### Point Source SCC VOC Percent Reduction

2017 2020

Refinery 4

- 03

- 011

- xx (floating roof tank SCCs,

gasoline or crude oil only ) 82 85

Bulk Terminal 4

- 04

- 001

- xx (floating roof tank SCCs) 40 50

Bulk Plant and Pipeline

Breakout Station 4

- 04

- 002

- xx (floating roof tank SCCs

gasoline or crude oil only) 52 65



### Only New Jersey has existing rules in place , and the above percent reductions were applied

to the existing controls inventory.

For all other states with affected sources, the p otential reductions from the OTC rule were

applied in the “what if” inventory

.

5.3.3 OTC 2006 Model Rule for Asphalt Production Plants

T he OTC recommended that member states pursue state

- specific rulemakings or other

implementation methods that w ould achieve a 35 percent reduction in NOx emissions.

States were polled to determine whether they have adopted a rule that would achieve

reductions equivalent to the 2006 OTC model rule and whether the estimated reduction in

NOx emissions should be appli ed in 2017 and 2020 . Only Maine

, New Jersey and New

York indicated that the reductions should be applied. A 35 percent reduction in NOx

emissions for fuel burning SCCs in the 3

- 05

- 002

- xx series was applied to the existing

controls inventory for Maine, Ne w Jersey, and New York.

All other state s indicated that the NOx reductions should not be applied in the existing

controls inventory. The 35 percent reduction for other states was applied in the “what if”

inventory.

5.3.4 OTC 2006 Model Rule for Cement Manufa cturing Plants

Cement kilns are located in Maine, Maryland, New York, Pennsylvania, and Virginia. T he

OTC recommended state

- specific rulemakings or other implementation methods that

would result in about a 60 percent reduction in uncontrolled levels NOx e missions or meet

the following emission limits based on kiln type:

Wet: 3.88 lb/ton clinker

Long Dry: 3.44 lb/ton clinker

Preheater: 2.36 lb/ton clinker

Precalciner: 1.52 lb/ton clinkerDocumentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 65



### Cement kilns are already subject to NOx controls as part of Phase I of the NO

x 

### SIP call or

state

- specific RACT requriements

. The e mission reductions resulting from the NOx SIP

call or RACT requirements are already accounted for in the 2007 inventory.

The following methods were used to calculate the additional reductions from the OTC

2006 Control Measure in each state :

Maine has a single kiln that was converted from an existing wet process cement

kiln to a dry process (preheater/precalciner type) kiln a nd underwent a BACT

review around 2005. The permitted emission rate is 1,533 tons per year with an

annual capacity of 766,500 tons of clinker (e.g., about 4 lbs/ton of clinker). Maine

does not plan on any additional controls, so no incremental reductions were applied

for the either the existing controls or “what if” inventory

.

Maryland indicated controls will become effective in 2011 for the two facilities in

the state . Maryland specified a 25 percent reduction for the Holcim facility and a

40 percent reduction for the Lehigh facility for the existing controls inventory . No

reductions were specified for the two kilns at the Essroc facility for the existing

controls inventory. No additional reductions were specified for any cement kiln for

the “what if

” inventory

.

New York three cement plants: Each has a different RACT requirement effective

7/1/2012. The three limits are; 6.59 lb/ton

, 2.88 lb/ton and 1.5 lb/tom (30 day

rolling av erage )

. For this inventory, we have assumed that these post

- 2007 RACT

requirements have a n incremental control efficiency of 40 percent and we have

applied this reduction in the existing controls inventory. No additional reductions

were specified for any cement kiln for the “what if” inventory.

Pennsylvania provided kiln

- specific projected future year NOx emissions for 2017

and 2020 based on existing post

- 2007 state requirements . A kiln

- specific control

factor was calculated based on the ratio of the future year emissions to the 2007

emissions and was applied for the exi sting controls inventory. No additional

reductions were specified for any cement kiln for the “what if” inventory.

Virginia has a single preheater/precalciner kiln that is not located in the OTR.

Virginia does not plan on any additional controls since the facility is not in the

OTR , so no incremental reductions were applied for the either the existing controls

or “what if “ inventories.Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 66



### 5.3.5 OTC 2006 Model Rule for Glass and Fiberglass Furnaces

T he OTC recommended state

- specific rulemakings or other implem entation methods to

achieve an approximately 85 percent reduction in NOx emissions from uncontrolled levels.

Emission reductions for glass and fiberglass furnaces were calculated using the

methodology previously developed and documented in the OTC report (OTC 2007). Glass

and fiberglass furnaces are located in Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York,

Pennsylvania, and Virginia. The following methods were used to calculate the additional

reductions from the OTC 2006 Control Measure in each s tate:

Ma ryland indicated that a 48 percent reduction should be applied to the single glass

manufacturing facility in Maryland.

Massachusetts indicated that they have a single facility with two furnaces furnaces;

one furnace installing oxy

- firing at 1.3 lb NOx pe r ton of glass, and the other at 5.3

lb/ton. The facility will be complying with EPA NSR enforcement Consent Decree

by 2017

. Massachusetts indicated that plant

- wide emissions are expected to

decrease by 35 percent in 2017 and 2020.

New Jersey indicated that a 50 percent reduction in NOx emissions should be

applied to glass and fiberglass furnaces in 2013, 2017, 2020 and 2025.

New York did not provide guidance regarding glass and fiberglass furnaces . We

used the percent reductions developed and document ed in the previous round of

emission projections developed for MARAMA (MARAMA 2007). An

incremental control efficiency of 70 percent was used for New York glass and

fiberglass furnaces in that inventory.

Virginia indicated that they have no plans to imple ment the OTC measure, and no

NOx reductions were applied to glass/fiberglass furnaces in Virginia.

All of the above reductions for glass and fiberglass furnaces were accounted for in the

existing controls inventory. No additional reductions were specifi ed for any glass or

fiberglass furnace for the “what if” inventory.

5.3.6 OTC 2006 Model Rule for ICI Boilers

In Resolution 06

- 02, the OTC recommended that OTC member states pursue as necessary

and appropriate state

- specific rulemakings or other implementation methods to establish

emission reduction percentages, emission rates or technologies for ICI boilers based on

guidelines that varied by boiler size and fuel type.

.Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 67



### States were polled to determine whether they have adopted a rule that would achieve

reduct ions equivalent to the 2006 OTC recommendations and whether the estimated

reduction in NOx emissions should be applied in 2017 and 2020 . Most state s have not

adopted rules equivalent to the 2006 OTC recommendations. These state s indicated that

they will likely to depend on USEPA national rule for possible inclusion in the BOTW

inventory. Specifically, the OTC Resolution 10

- 01 (June, 2010) called on USEPA for

national regulations for ICI boilers

.

Three state s specified that that have adopted post

- 2007 ICI boiler rules to reduce NOx

emissions. The percent reductions for ICI boilers were for these state s were calculated as

describe in the following paragraphs.

New Jersey provided NOx percent reductions that va ried by heat input rate and fuel/boiler

type and included an 80 percent rule effectiveness adjustment, as shown in Exhibit 5.4

. The NIF file submitted by New Jersey for this project did not include the boiler design

capacity. This data gap was filled usi ng the boiler design capacities previously developed

for the OTC study in 2006, if available; otherwise the SCC description was used to assign

a default boiler design capacity. No additional reductions were specified for the “what if”

inventory for New Je rsey.

Exhibit 5.4 NonEGU Point Source Emission Reductions from

New Jersey ICI Boiler NOx Rules

Heat Input Rate

(mmBtu/hr) Fuel/Boiler Type Overall %

Reduction

2007

- 201 7

at least 5 but < 10 All 20%

at least 10 but < 20 All 20%

at least 25 but < 50 Natural gas only 40%

No. 2 Fuel oil only 40%

Refinery fuel gas and

other gaseous fuels 40%

Other liquid fuels 40%

Duel Fuel using fuel oil

and/or natural gas 40%

at least 50 but < 100 Natural gas only 40%

No. 2 Fuel oil only 27%

Other liquid fuels 27%

Duel Fuel using fuel oil

and/or natural gas 40%

at least 100 or greater No. 2 Fuel oil only 40%Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 68



### New York specified that a 50 percent reduction should be applied in the existing controls

inventory for all boilers with greater than 25 mmBtu/hour design capacity. The NIF file

submitted by New York for this project did not include the boiler design capacity. This

data gap was filled using the boiler design capacities previously developed for the OTC

stud y in 2006, if available; otherwise the SCC description was used to assign a default

boiler design capacity. No additional reductions were specified for the “what if” inventory

for New York.

New Hampshire specified that reductions should be applied to boile rs in the 50

- 100 and

100

- 250 mmBtu/hour size ranges. We used the methodology previously developed and

documented in the OTC report (OTC 2 007). Reductions vary by size range and fuel type.

State

- by

- state emission reduction percentages were developed by c omparing the state

emission limit in lbs/mmBTU to the OTC 2006 recommended limit. There are no coal

fired ICI boilers in New Hampshire. For other fossil fuels used in New Hampshire, the

NOx percent reduction was as follows:

Natural gas, 50

- 100 mmBtu/hr: 50% reduction

Natural gas, 100

- 250 mmBtu/hr: 0% reduction

Residual/distillate oil, 50

- 100 mmBtu/hr: 33.3% reduction

Residual/distillate oil, 100

- 250 mmBtu/hr: 33.3% reduction

No additional reductions were specified for the “what if” inventory for New Hamps hire.

All other states do not have existing rules that would result in post

- 2007 emission

reductions. These states indicated that they will likely to depend on USEPA national rule

for possible inclusion in the BOTW inventory. Specifically, the OTC Resolution 10

- 01

(June, 2010) called on USEPA for national regulations for ICI boilers

. However, in order

to estimate the potential NOx emission reductions for the “what if” control scenario, the

guidelines from OTC Resolution 06

- 02 shown in Exhibit 5. 5 w ere used to estimate

potential NOx reductions in the “what if” inventory for those states without existing rules,

except Virginia

.

Exhibit 5.5 OTC Resolution 06

- 02 Guidelines for ICI Boiler NOx Rules

Boiler Size

(mmBtu/hr) NOx Percent Reduction from Base Emissions by Fuel Type

Natural Gas #2 Fuel Oil #4/#6 Fuel Oil Coal

<25 10 10 10 10

25 to 50 50 50 50 50*

50 to 100 10 10 10 10*

100 to 250 76 40 40 40*Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 69

>250 **   ** 

* Resolution 06

- 02 did not specify a percent reduction for coal; for modeling purposes, the same

percent reduction specified for #4/#6 fuel oil was used for coal.

** Resolution 06

- 02 specified the reduction for > 250mmBtu/hour boilers to be the “same as EGUs

of similar size.” The OTC Commissioners have not yet recommended an emissio n rate or percent

reduction for EGUs. As a result, no reductions for ICI boilers > 250 mmBtu/hour were included in

the potential controls inventory.



### Since the above guidelines vary by boiler size and fuel type, the specific percent reduction

applied to an individual source depends on the SCC and design capacity of the source. The

SCC identifies the fuel type, while the design capacity identifies the boiler size. In many

cases, the design capacities in the MANE

- VU NIF database were missing. The following

hi erarchy was used in filling in gaps where design capacities were missing:

Use the design capacity field from the NIF EU table, if available;

Use the design capacities provided by agencies to fill in the data gaps in the

MANE

- VU 2002 inventory ;

Use design capacity as reported either the Unit Description field in the NIF EU

table or the Process Description field from the NIF EP table, if available;

Use design capacity from the source’s Title V permit, if the Title V permit was

online;

Use the SCC description to determine the design capacity (for example, SCC 1

- 02

-

006

- 01 describes a >100 mmBtu/hr natural gas

- fired boiler, SCC 1

- 02

- 006

- 02

describes a 10

- 100 mmBtu/hr natural gas

- fired boiler)

.

After performing this gap

- filling exercise, each boiler was assigned to one of the size

ranges and fuel types shown in the above table. The emission reduction percentages by

boiler size range and fuel type were then applied.

5.4 F UEL OIL SULFUR LIMITS

MANE

- VU developed a low sulfur fuel oil strategy to help states develop Reg ional Haze

SIP s (MANE

- VU 2007). As previously discussed in Section 4.5, Each state was polled

and asked to indicate when, if at all, the MANE

- VU strategy would be incorporated into

their state rules. States were also asked to provide the 2007 sulfur cont ents for each fuel

type by county in order to calculate the percent reduction in emissions for the future years.

Three states (MD, NJ, and NY) have adopted or are committed to adopting the strategy

into their rules. The reductions for these three states were accounted for in the “existingDocumentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 70



### controls” inventory. All other jurisdictions indicated that not enough regulatory

development progress has been made to include the reductions in future years with

absolute certainty. The potential reductions for these states were accounted for in the

“potential new controls” inventory. One state (VA) has no plans to adopt the low sulfur

fuel oil strategy. The percent reductions by fuel type and county are contained in

Appendix K.

5.5 S TATE

- SPECIFIC NONEGU CONTROL FACTOR S

The following state

- specific nonEGU control factors were provided:

Bellefield Boiler Plant, Allegheny County

. Allegheny County indicated that this

facility changed their fuel source from coal to natural gas in July 2009 and future

year emissions were c hanged to reflect the fuel switch.

USS Clairton Works

, Allegheny County

. The facility will remove Batteries 7

- 9

and have Battery C operational by 2013, resulting in a change in PM emissions in

2013. Also, USS Clairton Works will remove Batteries 1

- 3 and have Battery D

operational in 2015, resulting in a change in PM emissions in 2017 and 2020.

Chrysler, Delaware

. The Chrysler facility (ID 1000300128) shut down in 2009.

Delaware specified that only a 25 percent reduction should be taken for all

polluta nts since some emissions will be banked for future use by other sources.

O S G Ship Management (ID 1000500093), Delaware

. Delaware provided

source

- specific growth factors and percent reductions in VOC emissions for 2017

and 2020 from the lightering opera tions at O S G Ship Management (ID

1000500093).

Control Technology Guidance (CTG) Documents, Delaware. Delaware

determined that VOC e mission reductions from new CTG recommendations would

be very small. Although the new CTGs set up new recommendations for higher

control efficiencies, th e actual VOC reductions would be minimum, if not none

,

because most DE’s existing facilities are not affected by the new requirements and

emissions from those facilities are relatively small (based on 2002 inventory ).

Unit Shutdowns, Delaware. Delaware identified several emission units that have

shut down at the following facilities: Dow Reichhold Specialty L atex (ID

1000100016), SPI Poly

- Ols (ID 1000300426), and Invistas (ID 1000500002).

Emissions for all pollutants were set to zero for these units.Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 71



### Dover Air Force Base, Delaware. Delaware identified four boilers at Dover Air

Force Base (ID 1000100001) that ceased using fuel oil in March 2010. SO2

emissions for these boilers were set to zero.

Premcor Refinery NOx Pla ntwide Cap, Delaware. The refinery was sold to the

Delaware City Refining Company and an agreement was reached with DNREC's

Secretary that allows plant

- wide applicability limit (cap) for NOx. T o project

emissions, as well as for modeling purposes, Delawa re decided to spread out the

NOx

- cap to each stack. Del a ware estimated a plantwide reduction of 10.05 percent

in 2013 and 41.22 percent in both 2017 and 2020.

Wausau Paper Specialty Products, Maine. The Wausau Paper Specialty

Products facility (ID 2300700007 ) closed in 2009. All emissions were set to zero

for this facility in the 2017 and 2020 projection inventories.

2009 NJ Rule for NOx for Municipal Solid Waste Incinerators, New Jersey.

This rule will achieve a 27 percent reduction from one faci lity

- Camden County

Energy Recovery Associates, L.P. (ID 3400751614).

NJ rule for VOC Storage Tanks, New Jersey. New Jersey provided expected

VOC emission reductions resulting from post

- 2007 rules for VOC storage tanks.

For refinery floating roof storag e tanks (SCC 4

- 03

- 011

- xx), the reductions are 75

percent for 2013, 82 percent for 2017, and 85 percent for 2020. For bulk terminal

tanks (SCC 4

- 04

- 001

- xx), the reductions are 20 percent for 2013, 40 percent for

2017, and 50 percent for 2020. For pipeline breakout stations (SCCs 4

- 04

- 002

- xx

and 4

- 06

- 005

- xx), the reductions are 26 percent for 2013, 52 percent for 2017, and

65 percent for 2020.

International Paper

– Franklin Mill, Virginia. The International Paper

–

Franklin Mill (ID 5109300006) closed eff ective 2010. All emissions were set to

zero for this facility in the 2017 and 2020 projection inventories.Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 72



## 6.0 NONROAD MODEL CATEGORIES

The USEPA ’s NONROAD model estimates emissions from equipment such as

recreational marine vessels, recreational land

- based vehicles, farm and construction

machinery, lawn and garden equipment , a ircraft ground support equipment (GSE) and rail

maintenance equipment. This equipment is powered by diesel, gasoline, compressed

natural gas (CNG) or liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) engi nes.

The National Mobile Inventory Model (NMIM) was developed by USEPA to develop

county

- level emission estimates for certain types of nonroad equipment. NMIM uses the

current version the NONROAD model to develop emission estimates and was used to

develo p the projection inventories discussed here. The NMIM national county database

contains monthly input data to reflect county specific fuel parameters and temperatures.

Most of the work associated with executing NMIM involved updating the NMIM county

data base with State

- specific information. For this analysis, we used the NMIM2008

software (version NMIM20090504), the National County Database (version

NCD20090531), and N ONROAD2008a (July 2009 version) as a starting point. Changes

were made to the NCD20090 531 based on review of data by the States. The purpose of

this review was to create a new NCD specific to the 2007 base year model runs and the

three projection year model runs. Changes were made to a copy of the NCD20090531 to

create a new NCD used for the emission inventory runs. That NCD is called

NCD20090910MARAMA

.

6.1 STATE REVIEW OF NMIM FUEL CHARACTERISTICS

For the 2017 and 2020 projection year inventories, AMEC provided data on fuel

characteristics from the NCD20090531 to the States to determine if they had additional

changes required for the fuel characteristics for future year inventories. None of the States

had changes to the fuel characteristics, except for CT which provided revisions to the six

fuels that they had provided for the 2007 base year inventory to account for a number of

changes including changes to RVP and fuel sulfur.

Connecticut provided updated values for the volume and market share components for

ethanol which is used by NMIM to determine the oxygen percentage for NONROAD runs

. Complete data replacement records were obtained for CT for the following tables: gasoline

inputs, diesel inputs, countymonthyear inputs

, and datasource inputs. CT added six new

fuels which were given NRGasolineIds of 5000

- 5005 inclusive. Data was prov ided for

both the base year (2007) and projection years (2013, 2017, and 2020).Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 73



### The diesel fuel sulfur values for the projection years were maintained at their default

values for all other States since they matched the USEPA recommended values.

6.2 USE OF EXTE RNAL FILES IN THE PROJECTION YEAR NMIM

RUNS

For the 2007 base year inventory (MARAMA 201 2 ), revisions were made to the allocation

files for several categories. These files are used to allocate emissions calculated at the state

level down to the county lev el and to add entries to the countynrfile NCD table. States

were asked if they would like to revise this table for future years. No revisions were

recommended. Thus external files used for the 2007 base year runs were used in the runs

for the projection years.

6.3 NMIM RUN SPECIFICATIONS

The specifications for each NMIM run were developed for groups of States within the

MANE

- VU+VA region. All States except for CT, NY, NJ and PA were run together for

each year. CT was run alone for 2007, 2017, and 2020 because changes were requested for

the base year. NY, NJ and PA were run together for each individual projection year. The

settings for each specification panel within the NMIM model for the projection year runs

are detailed below.

Description: A short d escriptive term for the run was entered for each specific run.

Geography: The “county” option was selected for each run. All counties within the

State were selected.

Time: Every month in the Months check box area was selected. On the time panel,

the year (2017 or 2020) was selected in the drop down box and added to the year

selections area. With the exception of the CT, all runs were performed for only one

year. The Use Yearly Weather Data check box was selected; however, year

specific data was not avai lable within NMIM for the projection years. The only

years included within the NMIM model for NCD20090531 are 1999

- 2008

inclusive. If the specific year requested is not available, then NMIM uses 20 year

average data for the estimates. Thus while the Use Yearly Weather Data box was

checked, since the specific year was not there (except for the CT 2007 base year re

run), the 20 year average data in the countymonthhour table are used. However,

because the meteorology data for future years will be assumed t o be the same as

was used for 2007, AMEC revised the AverageTemp and AverageRelHumidity

values in the countymonthhour table of the NCD20090910MARAMA to reflect

actual 2007 values. Thus the values in that table are 2007 values not 20 year

average values an d thus causes the NMIM model to run with the same data used for

the 2007 base year runs.

Vehicles/Equipment: Only the nonroad vehicle/equipment area was selected. All

fuels and all vehicle types were selected for each State run. Aircraft ground supportDocumentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 74



### eq uipment was included in the run specifications but those records were removed

during post

- processing steps.

Fleet: No selections or information was entered in this panel.

Pollutants: Exhaust PM10, PM2.5, and Criteria pollutants (with HC reported as

VOC) we re selected except for CO 2



### .

Advanced features: Only the server and database were selected in this panel.

Output: Under the Geographic Representation panel the County selection was

made. In the General Output area, a new database was selected on the server for

the output.

All added external files for use in each State run were placed in the externalfiles directory

of the NCD. Entries for all external files included were included in the countynrfiles table

of the NCD.

6.4 REMOVAL OF AIRPORT GROUND SUPPORT EQUIP MENT

The NMIM/NONROAD model calculates emissions from a irport ground s upport

e quipment . As discussed in Section 7 of this TSD, emissions from airport ground support

equipment is also included in USEPA’s aircraft inventory prepared using the Federal

Aviati on Administration’s Emissions and Dispersion Modeling System (EDMS).

Correspondence with USEPA indicated that USEPA considers the emissions calculated by

EDMS to be better than those calculated by NONROAD. For this reason, all emissions

calculated by NMI M/NONROAD for airport ground support equipment were removed

from the inventory to avoid double counting.

6.5 STATE AND STAKEHOLDER REVIEW AND COMMENT

New York state provided the results of their own NONROAD model runs for 2017 and

2020 . These model results w ere provided by month and were used instead of the NMIM

model runs made by MACTEC.

6.6 CHANGES MADE FOR VERSION 3 MODEL RUNS

Two sectors of the inventory were updated in version 3. First, Virginia and New York

requested that their emissions be recalculated using the information developed through

Version 2 of the inventory for the MARAMA States. The Virginia reruns were performed

for all categories except for ground support equipment and for recreational marine vessels.

Recreational marine vessel emissions for Virginia were calculated along with those for

other states (see below). Those values replaced the SEMAP supplied values used in

versions prior to Version 3. In addition, estimates for all sectors of the inventory for New

York other than ground suppor t equipment and recreational marine vessels were calculatedDocumentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 75



### using NMIM default data for the MARAMA area. New York had originally provided data

from NONROAD model runs that they performed separately. For Version 3 of the

inventory, New York emissions were calculated using NMIM runs set up using the same

criteria as those for other states in earlier versions of the inventory. Both New York and

Virginia were provided with the opportunity to review fuel characteristics prior to their

runs. Only Virginia mad e changes to the fuels, however the only changes that were made

were to assign alternative default fuels to counties. The fuel characteristics were not

modified from the NMIM defaults, only the fuel IDs associated with a particular

county/month combinatio n were changed to another default fuel. Those changes were

instituted in the NCD developed specifically for MARAMA. New York did not request

any changes to the default values. In addition, the revisions made to the housing

population allocation files wer e instituted for both states.

The second change in version 3 was to modify the recreational marine vessel populations

for all states except Vermont and Maine. A revised population file was prepared for

Virginia but not utilized in the version 3 runs. Est imates for Virginia, Vermont and Maine

were prepared using the growth algorithm built into the NMIM/NONROAD model. For

all other states, revised population data was estimated for the years 2017 and 2020. EPA

had recommended that rather than use the defa ult growth algorithm of the model for those

states that had their 2007 base year data updated for this category, separate population

estimates for each projection year should be prepared and included in the population files.

The 2007 population data was p rovided by the National Marine Manufacturers Association

(NMMA). Total state populations for each of the three major categories contained in the

NONROAD model (outboard, inboard/sterndrive and personal watercraft) were provided

for each state. Because th e population files used by the NONROAD model (and thus

NMIM) were configured with population values for various horsepower categories, AMEC

(formerly AMEC) determined the fraction of the total for each marine vessel type in each

horsepower category from th e NONROAD default population files. These fractions were

then used to allocate the total state population obtained from NMMA to the various

horsepower categories.

The only exception to this was that some states added in data for sailboats. The sailboat

populations were split among two of the default categories. In addition, New Hampshire

provided their own revised population file. Their population data for New Hampshire was

provided by the New Hampshire DMV and is not from NMMA.

AMEC then used the nat ional growth factors supplied in the default NMIM/NONROAD

model to estimate populations for each year. Each horsepower/population category in the

2007 population file was grown to either 2017 or 2020 using the ratio between the 2005Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 76



### and 2015 growth factor s (to represent growth between 2007 and 2017) and between the

2005 and 2025 growth factors (to represent growth between 2007 and 2020). Those ratios

were used to grow the 2007 population to 2017 and 2020 respectively. The only exception

to this was Pennsy lvania. Pennsylvania presented data indicating that there was little

growth expected during the time periods that were considered and thus maintained the

2007 population estimates for both 2017 and 2020.

Pennsylvania presented information showing from hi storical data that indicated a

downward trend in the overall motorized pleasure craft population in 6 of the last 9 years.

The data also indicated that the population was essentially unchanged in the last three years

due to an adverse economic environment . Populations of all motorized pleasure craft in

Pennsylvania as tracked by the Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission showed nearly a 6

percent decline from 2001 to 2007 or an average annual decline of 1.0 percent over that

period. Pleasure craft populat ions remained nearly unchanged from 2008 to 2010.

As a consequence, they forecaste zero percent growth for pleasure craft is from 2007 to

2017 and 2007 to 2020. The types of pleasure craft affected by this growth rate are:

2282005010, 2

- stroke outboard,

2282005015, 2

- stroke personal water craft,

2282010005, 4

- stroke inboard/sterndrive,

2282020005, diesel inboard/sterndrive, and

2282020010, diesel outboards

6.7 NMIM/NONROAD GROWTH AND CONTROL INFORMATION

In estimating future year emissions, t he NMIM/ NONROAD model includes growth and

scrappage rates for equipment in addition to a variety of control programs. It is not

possible separate out the future year emissions due to “growth only” or “control only” in a

single run. That is, the model run provides a sin gle future year estimate that is a “growth

and control” scenario.

The growth data used in the NMIM/NONROAD model is documented in a USEPA report

(USEPA 2004c). The GROWTH packet of the NONROAD model cross

- references each

SCC to a growth indicator code. T he indicator code is an arbitrary code that identifies an

actual predicted value such as human population or employment that is used to estimate

the future year equipment population. The GROWTH packet also defines the scrappage

curves used to estimate the future year model year distribution.Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 77



### The NMIM/NONROAD model also accounts for all USEPA emission standards for

nonroad equipment. There are mulitiple standards that vary by equipment type, rated

power, model year, and pollutatant. Exhibit 6.1 is a summa ry of the emission control

programs accounted for in the NMIM/NONROAD model. A complete summary of the

nonroad equipment emission standards can be found on the USEPA nonroad emission

standards reference guide website (USEPA 2011).

Exhibit 6 .1 Control P rograms Included in the NMIM/NONROAD Model

Regulation Description

Control of Air Pollution;

Determination of Significance for

Nonroad Sources and Emission

Standards for New Nonroad

Compression Ignition Engines At or

Above 37 Kilowatts

59 FR 31036

June 17, 1994 This rule establishes Tier 1 exhaust emission standards for

HC, NOx, CO, and PM for nonroad compression

- ignition

(CI) engines ≥37kW (≥50hp). Marine engines are not

included in this rule. The start dates and pollutants

affected vary by hp categor y as follows:

50

- 100 hp: Tier 1,1998; NOx only

100

- 175 hp: Tier 1, 1997; NOx only

175

- 750 hp: Tier 1, 1996; HC, CO, NOx, PM

>750 hp: Tier 1, 2000; HC, CO, NOx, PM

Emissions for New Nonroad Spark

Ignition Engines At or Below 19

Kilowatts; Final Rule

60 FR 34581

July 3, 1995 This rule establishes Phase 1 exhaust emission standards

for HC, NOx, and CO for nonroad spark

- ignition engines

≤19kW (≤25hp). This rule includes both handheld (HH)

and nonhandheld (NHH) engines. The Phase 1 standards

become effective in 1997 for :

Class I NHH engines (<225cc),

Class II NHH engines (≥225cc),

Class III HH engines (<20cc), and

Class IV HH engines (≥20cc and <50cc).

The Phase 1 standards become effective in 1998 for:

Class V HH engines (≥50cc)

Final Rule for New Gasoline Spark

Ignition Marine Engines; Exemptions

for New Nonroad Compression

Ignition Engines at or Above 37

Kilowatts and New Nonroad Spark

Ignition Engines at or Below 19

Kilowatts

61 FR 52088

October 4, 1996 This rule establishes exhaust emission standards for

HC+NOx for personal watercraft and outboard (PWC/OB)

marine SI engines. The standards are phased in from

1998

- 2006.

Control of Emissions of Air Pollution

From Nonroad Diesel Engines

63 FR 56967

October 23, 1998 This final rule sets Tier 1 standards for engines under 50

hp, phasing in from 1999 to 2000. It also phases in more

stringent Tier 2 standards for all engine sizes from 2001 to

2006, and yet more stringent Tier 3 standards for engines

rated over 50 hp from 2006 to 2008. The Tier 2 standards

apply to NMHC+NOx, CO, and PM, whereas the Tier 3

standards apply to NMHC+NOx and CO. The start dates

by hp category and tier are as follows:Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 78

Regulation Description

hp<25: Tier 1,2000; Tier 2, 2005; no Tier 3

25

- 50 hp: Tier 1, 1999; Tier 2, 2004; no Tier 3

50

- 100 hp: Tier 2, 2004; Tier 3, 2008

100

- 175 hp: Tier 2, 2003; Tier 3, 2007

175

- 300 hp: Tier 2, 2003; Tier 3, 2006

300

- 600 hp: Tier 2, 2001, Tier 3, 2006

600

- 750 hp: Tier 2, 2002; Tier 3, 2006

>750 hp: Tier 2, 2006, no Tier 3

This rule does not apply to marine diesel engines above 50

hp.

Phase 2: Emission Standards for

New Nonroad Nonhandheld Spark

Ignition Engines At or Below 19

Kilowatts

64 FR 15207

March 30, 1999 This rule establishes Phase 2 exhaust emission standards

for HC+NOx for nonr oad nonhandheld (NHH) spark

- ignition

engines ≤19kW (≤25hp). The Phase 2 standards for Class

I NHH engines (<225cc) become effective on August 1,

2007 (or August 1, 2003 for any engine initially produced

on or after that date). The Phase 2 standards for C lass II

NHH engines (≥225cc) are phased in from 2001

- 2005.

Phase 2: Emission Standards for

New Nonroad Spark

- Ignition

Handheld Engines At or Below 19

Kilowatts and Minor Amendments to

Emission Requirements Applicable

to Small Spark

- Ignition Engines and

Ma rine Spark

- Ignition Engines; Final

Rule

65 FR 24268

April 25, 2000 This rule establishes Phase 2 exhaust emission standards

for HC+NOx for nonroad handheld (HH) spark

- ignition

engines ≤19kW (≤25hp). The Phase 2 standards are

phased in from 2002

- 2005 for C lass III and Class IV

engines and are phased in from 2004

- 2007 for Class V

engines.

Control of Emissions From Nonroad

Large Spark

- Ignition Engines and

Recreational Engines (Marine and

Land

- Based); Final Rule

67 FR 68241

November 8, 2002 This rule establis hes exhaust and evaporative standards

for several nonroad categories:

1) Two tiers of emission standards are established for large

spark

- ignition engines over 19 kW. Tier 1 includes exhaust

standards for HC+NOx and CO and is phased in from

2004

- 2006. T ier 2 becomes effective in 2007 and includes

exhaust standards for HC+NOx and CO as well as

evaporative controls affecting fuel line permeation, diurnal

emissions and running loss emissions.

2) Exhaust and evaporative emission standards are

established fo r recreational vehicles, which include

snowmobiles, off

- highway motorcycles, and all

- terrain

vehicles (ATVs). For snowmobiles, HC and CO exhaust

standards are phased

- in from 2006

- 2012. For off

- highway

motorcycles, HC+NOx and CO exhaust emission

standards are phased in from 2006

- 2007. For ATVs,

HC+NOx and CO exhaust emission standards are phased

in from 2006

- 2007. Evaporative emission standards for

fuel tank and hose permeation apply to all recreational

vehicles beginning in 2008.

3) Exhaust emission sta ndards for HC+NOx, CO, and PM

for recreational marine diesel engines over 50 hp begin in

2006

- 2009, depending on the engine displacement. These

are “Tier 2” equivalent standards.Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 79

Regulation Description

Control of Emissions of Air Pollution

From Nonroad Diesel Engines and

Fuel; Final Rule (Clean Air Nonroad

Diesel Rule

– Tier 4)

69 FR 38958

June 29, 2004 This final rule sets Tier 4 exhaust standards for CI engines

covering all hp categories (except marine and

locomotives), and also regulates nonroad diesel fuel sulfur

content.

1) The Tier 4 start dates and pollutants affected vary by hp

and tier as follows:

hp<25: 2008, PM only

25

- 50 hp: Tier 4 transitional, 2008, PM only;

Tier 4 final, 2013, NMHC+NOx and PM

50

- 75 hp: Tier 4 transitional, 2008; PM only;

Tier 4 final, 2013, NMHC+NOx and PM

75

- 175 hp: Tier 4 transitional, 2012, HC, NOx, and PM;

Tier 4 final, 2014, HC,NOx,PM

175

- 750 hp:Tier 4 transitional, 2011, HC, N Ox, and PM;

Tier 4 final, 2014, HC,NOx,PM

>750 hp: Tier 4 transitional, 2011, HC, NOx, and PM;

Tier 4 final, 2015, HC,NOx,PM

2) This rule will reduce nonroad diesel fuel sulfur levels in

two steps. First, starting in 2007, fuel sulfur levels in

nonroad diesel fuel will be limited to a maximum of 500

ppm, the same as for current highway diesel fuel. Second,

starting in 2010, fuel sulfur levels in most nonroad diesel

fuel will be reduced to 15 ppm.

Control of Emissi

ons From Nonroad

Spark

- Ignition Engines and

Equipment; Final Rule (Bond Rule)

73 FR 59034

October 8, 2008 This rule establishes exhaust and evaporative standards

for small SI engines and marine SI engines:

1) Phase 3 HC+NOx exhaust emission standards are

e stablished for Class I NHH engines starting in 2012 and

for Class II NHH engines starting in 2011. There are no

new exhaust emission standards for handheld engines.

New evaporative standards are adopted for both handheld

and nonhandheld equipment. The n ew evaporative

standards control fuel tank permeation, fuel hose

permeation, and diffusion losses. The evaporative

standards begin in 2012 for Class I NHH engines and 2011

for Class II NHH engines. For handheld engines, the

evaporative standards are phas ed

- in from 2012

- 2016.

2) More stringent HC+NOx and CO standards are

established for marine SI PWC/OB engines beginning in

2010. In addition, new exhaust HC+NOx and CO

standards are established for sterndrive and inboard (SD/I)

marine SI engines also begin ning in 2010. High

performance SD/I engines are subject to separate

HC+NOx and CO exhaust standards that are phased

- in

from 2010

- 2011. New evaporative standards were also

adopted for all marine SI engines that control fuel hose

permeation, diurnal emissi ons, and fuel tank permeation

emissions. The hose permeation, diurnal, and tank

permeation standards take effect in 2009, 2010, and 2011.

Source: USEPA 2010eDocumentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 80



## 7.0 NONROAD MAR SOURCE CATEGORIES

The USEPA’s NONROAD model does not estimate emissions for three nonroad source

categories: commercial marine vessel, aircraft, and railroad locomotives. The emission

projection methodology and data sources for these three categories (collectively referred to

as marine, airport, railroad {or MAR}) are discussed in thi s section. The data used to

calculate the growth and control factors for MAR sources are included in Appendix L

.

7.1 COMMERCIAL MARINE VESSELS

For the purpose of emission calculations , marine vessel engines are divided into three

categories based on displacement (swept volume) per cylinder. Category 1 and Category 2

marine diesel engines typically range in size from about 500 to 8,000 kW (700 to 11,000

hp). These engines are used to provide propulsion power on many kinds of vessels

including tugboat s, pushboats, supply vessels, fishing vessels, and other commercial

vessels in and around ports. They are also used as stand

- alone generators for auxiliary

electrical power on vessels. Category 3 marine diesel engines typically range in size from

2,500 t o 70,000 kW (3,000 to 100,000 hp). These are very large marine diesel engines used

for propulsion power on ocean

- going vessels such as container ships, oil tankers, bulk

carriers, and cruise ships.

The majority of marine vessels are powered by diesel engin es that are either fueled with

distillate or residual fuel oil blends. For the purpose of emission inventories, USEPA has

assumed that Category 3 vessels primarily use residual blends while Category 1 and 2

vessels typically use distillate fuels.

EPA dev eloped national emission inventories for Category 1 and 2 vessels and Category 3

vessels for calendar years 2002 through 2040 as part of its effort to develop emission

standards for these vessels. The methodologies used to develop the emission projections

(for both a baseline and controlled scenario) are documented in a regulatory impact

assessment (USEPA 2008 c ). We used the USEPA data and methodologies from these

RIAs to develop separate growth and control factors for Category 1 and 2 vessels (diesel)

an d Category 3 vessels (residual).

7.1.1 CMV Diesel Growth Factors

For Category 1 and 2 diesel vessels, USEPA used projection data for domestic shipping

from the AEO2006 (EIA 2006) . The annual growth rate reported in the RIA is 0.9%.

More recent growth data fo r domestic shipping is available in the AEO2010 ( EIA 2010 ).

Since Category 1 and 2 vessels primarily accounts for activity data for ships that carry

domestic cargo, we decided to use the recent growth data for domestic shipping availableDocumentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 81



### in the AEO2010. We used Table A

- 7 of the AEO2010 for international shipping to

calculate the growth factor for 2007

- 2013 to be 0.9 75 , for 2007

- 2017 to be 1.003 , and for

2007

- 2020 to be 1/033 . These growth factors were used for for CMV diesel port emissions

(SCC 22

- 80

- 002

- 100) and CMV diesel underway emissions (SCC 22

- 80

- 002

- 200).

7.1.2 CMV Diesel Control Factors

In developing their emission projections, USEPA developed two scenarios that accounted

for both the 2004 nonroad diesel rule and the 2008 diesel marine vessel rule:

The USEPA’s baseline (pre

- control) inventory accounted for :

1. the 0.9 percent annual growth in fuel use,

2. the impact of existing engine regulations that t ook effect in 2008,

3. the 2004 Clean Air Nonroad Diesel Rule that will decrease the allowable

levels of sulfur in fuel beginning in 2012, and

4. fleet turnover.

The USEPA’s controlled inventory accounted for :

1. the 0.9 percent annual growth in fuel use ;

2. the reductions included in the baseline inventory, and the reductions from

USEPA ’s 2008 rule Final Locomotive

- Marine rule for Tier 3 and 4 engines ;

and

3. The 2008 final rule that includes the first

- ever national emission standards

for existing marine diesel engines, applying to engines larger than 600kW

when they are remanufactured. The rule also sets T ier 3 emissions

standards for newly

- built engines that are phasing in from 2009. Finally,

the rule establishes Tier 4 standards for newly

- built commercial marine

diesel engines above 600kW, phasing in beginning in 2014.

T o calculate a control factor tha t account s for reductions included in the USEPA controlled

inventory, it was necessary to first calculate a “growth only” scenario applying USEPA ’s

0.9 percent annual growth rate to the 2006 base emissions. Once the growth rate was

applied, then a control factor for each pollutant was calculated by dividing the future year

controlled emissions by the future year “growth only” emissions. Exhibit 7 .1 shows the

control factors for 2017 and 2020 for diesel commercial marine vessels.Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 82



### Exhibit 7 .1 CMV Diesel Control Factors by Year and Pollutant

Year CO NOx PM10 PM2.5 SO2 VOC

2013 0.885 0.787 0.747 0.747 0.464 0.871

2017 0.830 0.642 0.550 0.550 0.076 0.708

2020 0.801 0.537 0.460 0.460 0.032 0.586



### 7.1.3 CMV Residual Oil Growth Factors

For Category 3 residual oil vessels, data from an USEPA

- sponsored study was used to

develop an annualized growth factor of 4.5 percent for the region. A few state s considered

the growth rate to be extremely high and not reflective of recent economic condi tions.

Since USEPA’s Category 3 vessel inventory is primarily based on activity data for ships

that carry foreign cargo, we decided to use the recent growth data for international

shipping available in the AEO2010. We used data from Table A

- 7 of the AEO2 010 for

international shipping to calculate the growth factor for 2007

- 2013 to be 0.940, for 2007

-

2017 to be 0.946, and for 2007

- 2020 to be 0.950. These growth factors were used for

CMV residual oil port emissions (SCC 22

- 80

- 003

- 100) and CMV residual oil underway

emissions (SCC 22

- 80

- 003

- 200).

7.1.4 CMV Residual Oil Control Factors

On December 22nd, 2009, USEPA announced final emission standards under the Clean

Air Act for new marine diesel engines with per

- cylinder displacement at or above 30 liters

(called Cat egory 3 marine diesel engines) installed on U.S.

- flagged vessels. The final

engine standards are equivalent to those adopted in the amendments to Annex VI to the

International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (a treaty called

"MARPOL" ). The emission standards apply in two stages: near

- term standards for newly

built engines will apply beginning in 2011, and long

- term standards requiring an 80

percent reduction in NOx will begin in 2016. USEPA also adopted changes to the diesel

fuel p rogram to allow for the production and sale of diesel fuel with no more than 1,000

ppm sulfur for use in Category 3 marine vessels. The regulations generally forbid

production and sale of fuels with more than 1,000 ppm sulfur for use in most U.S. waters,

unless operators achieve equivalent emission reductions in other ways.

On March 26, 2010, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) officially designated

waters off North American coasts as an emissions control area (ECA) in which stringent

internatio nal emission standards will apply to ships. In practice, implementation of the

ECA means that ships entering the designated area would need to use compliant fuel for

the duration of their voyage that is within that area, including time in port and voyages

whose routes pass through the area without calling on a port. The North American ECADocumentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 83



### includes waters adjacent the Atlantic extending up to 200 nautical miles from east coast of

the United States. The quality of fuel that complies with the ECA standard wi ll change

over time. From the effective date in 2012 until 2015, fuel used by vessels operating in

designated areas cannot exceed 1.0 percent sulfur (10,000 ppm). Beginning in 2015, fuel

used by vessels operating in these areas cannot exceed 0.1 percent sulfur (1000 ppm).

Beginning in 2016, NOx aftertreatment requirements become applicable.

To calculate a control factor that accounted for reductions included in the USEPA

controlled inventory, it was necessary to first calculate a “growth only” scenario a pplying

USEPA’s 4.5 percent annual growth rate to the 2006 base emissions. Once the growth rate

was applied, then a control factor for each pollutant was calculated by dividing the future

year controlled emissions by the future year “growth only” emission s.

Exhibit 7 .2 shows the control factors for 2017 and 2020 for residual oil commercial marine

vessels.

Exhibit 7 .2 CMV Residual Oil Control Factors by Year and Polluta nt

Year CO NOx PM10 PM2.5 SO2 VOC

2013 1.000 0.736 0.353 0.353 0.270 1.000

2017 1.000 0.654 0.216 0.216 0.120 1.000

2020 1.000 0.597 0.137 0.137 0.036 1.000



### 7.1.5 Military Vessels Growth and C ontrol Factors

Virginia reported emissions for military vessels, but did not distinguish between diesel or

residual fuels. We assumed that there would be “no growth” for military vessel activity

and emissions in Virginia would remain at 2007 levels in 2017 and 2020 . Vi rginia was the

only state to report emission from military vessels.

7.2 AIRCRAFT

Aircraft emissions in the 2007 MANE

- VU+VA inventory are available on either a county

by

- county or airport

- by

- airport basis for six types of aircraft operations:

Air carrier operat ions represent landings and take

- offs (LTOs) of commercial

aircraft with seating capacity of more than 60 seats;

Commuter/air taxi operations are one category. Commuter operations include

LTOs by aircraft with 60 or fewer seats that transport regional pas sengers onDocumentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 84



### scheduled commercial flights. Air taxi operations include LTOs by aircraft with 60

or fewer seats conducted on non

- scheduled or for

- hire flights;

General aviation represents all civil aviation LTOs not classified as commercial;

Military operations represent LTOs by military aircraft;

Ground Support Equipment (GSE) typically includes aircraft refueling and baggage

handling vehicles and equipment, aircraft towing vehicles, and passenger buses ;

and

Auxiliary power units (APUs) pro vide power to start the main engines and run the

heating, cooling, and ventilation systems prior to starting the main engines.

7.2.1 Aircraft Growth Factors

Aircraft operations were projected to future years by applying activity growth using data

on itinerant (ITN) operations at airports as reported in the Federal Aviation

Administration’s (FAA) Terminal Area Forecast (TAF) System for 2009

- 2030 (FAA

2010). The ITN operations are defined as aircraft take

- offs or landings. This information is

available for appro ximately 3300 individual airports. Actual LTOs are reported for 2007

and projected LTOs are provided for all years up to 2030.

We aggregated and applied this information at the county level for the four operation

types: commercial, general, air taxi, mili tary. We computed growth factors for each

operation type by dividing future

- year ITN by 2007

- year ITN. We assigned factors to

inventory SCCs based on the operation type, as shown in Exhibit 7 .3.

Exhibit 7 .3 Crosswalk between SCC and FAA Operations Type

SCC SCC Description FAA Operation Type Used for

Growth Factor

2265008005 Airport Ground Support Equipment, 4

- Stroke Gas Total Itinerant Operations

2267008005 Airport Ground Support Equipment, LPG Total Itinerant Operations

2268008005 Airport Ground Support Equipment, CNG Total Itinerant Operations

2270008000 Airport Ground Support Equipment, Diesel Total Itinerant Operations

2270008005 Airport Ground Support Equipment, Diesel Total Itinerant Operations

2275001000 Aircraft /Military Aircraft /Total Itinerant Military Operations

2275020000 Aircraft /Commercial Aircraft /Total: All Types Itinerant Air Carrier Operations

2275050000 Aircraft /General Aviation /Total Itinerant General Aviation Operations

2275050011 Aircraft /General Aviation /Piston Itinerant General Aviation Operations

2275050012 Aircraft /General Aviation /Turbine Itinerant General Aviation OperationsDocumentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 85

SCC SCC Description FAA Operation Type Used for

Growth Factor

2275060000 Aircraft /Air Taxi /Total Itinerant Air Taxi Operations

2275060011 Aircraft /Air Taxi /Piston Itinerant Air Taxi Operations

2275060012 Aircraft /Air Taxi /Turbine Itinerant Air Taxi Operations

2275070000 Aircraft /Aircraft Auxiliary Power Units /Total Total Itinerant Operations



### Exhibit 7 .4 summarizes the region

- wide growth factors by FAA operation type. The

growth factor for individual airports/counties may deviate substantially from these region

wide growth factors.

Exhibit 7 .4 Region

- wide Growth Factors from 2007 by FAA Operations Typ e

7.2.2 Aircraft Control Factors

The NOx aircraft engine emissions standards adopted by USEPA in November 2005

(USEPA 2005b) were reviewed. The standards are equivalent to the NOx emission

standards (adopted in 1999 for implementation beginning in 2004) of the United Nations

International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), and will bring the United States aircraft

standards into alignment with the international standards. The standards apply to new

aircraft engines used on commercial aircraft including small regional jets, single

- aisle andDocumentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 86



### twin

- aisle aircraft, and 747s and larger aircraft. The standards also apply to general

aviation and military aircraft, which sometimes use commercial engines. For example,

small regional jet engines are used in executive gen eral aviation aircraft, and larger

commercial aircraft engines may be used in military transport aircraft.

N early all previously certified or in

- production engine models currently meet or perform

better than the standards USEPA adopt ed in th e November 20 05 rule. In addition,

manufacturers have already been developing improved technology in response to the

ICAO standards. According to USEPA’s recent analysis for the proposed transport rule

(USEPA 2010a), this rule is expected to reduce NOx emissions by a pproximately 2 percent

in 2015 and 3 percent in 2020. Because of the relatively small amount of NOx reductions,

our aircraft emission projections do not account for this control program.

EPA has also issued an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPR) on lead

emissions from piston

- engine aircraft using leaded aviation gasoline (U S EPA 2010d)

. However, this rule has not yet been adopted and co

- benefits for criteria air pollutants are

likely to be small. Therefore, the effects of this rule were not inclu ded in the future

- year

emissions projections.

7.3 RAILROAD EQUIPMENT

Railroad locomotive engine emissions in the 2007 MARAMA inventory are classified into

the following categories:

Class I line haul locomotives are operated by large freight railroad companies and

are used to power freight train operations over long distances (SCC 22

- 85

- 002

-

006);

Class II/III line haul locomotives are operated by smaller freight railroad

companies and are used to power freight train operations over long distances (SCC

22

- 85

- 002

- 007);

Inter

- city passenger train locomotives are operated primarily by Amtrak to provide

inter

- city passenger transport (SCC 22

- 85

- 002

- 008) ;

Independent commuter rail systems operate locomotives provide passenger

transport within a metropolitan a rea (SCC 22

- 85

- 002

- 009) ; and

Yard/switch locomotives are used in freight yards to assemble and disassemble

trains, or for short hauls of trains that are made up of only a few cars ( SCC 22

- 85

-

002

- 010 ).Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 87



### 7.3.1 Railroad Growth Factors

In March 2008, USEPA finalized a three part program that will dramatically reduce

emissions from diesel locomotives of all types

-- line

- haul, switch, and passenger rail. As

part of this work USEPA developed a national emission inventory for calendar years 2002

through 2040. Emission projections methodologies for a baseline and controlled scenario

were developed and documented (USEPA 200 8c ). USEPA used projection data from the

AEO2006 (EIA 2 006). Table A

- 7 of AEO2006 showed that freight rail energy use will

grow 1.6 percent annually

.

More recent growth data is available in the AEO2010 which was published in May 2010.

There are separate projections for passenger rail and freight rail energy use. For the

MANE VU+VA inventory we relied on the more recent AEO2010 growth projections.

Passenger rail data from AEO2010 Table A

- 7 was used to calculate the growth factor for

2007

- 2013 to be 1.046, for 2007

- 2017 to be 1.121, and for 2007

- 2020 to be 1.171. These

growth factors were applied to inter

- city passenger train locomotives (SCC 22

- 85

- 002

-

008) and independent commuter rail systems (SCC 22

- 85

- 002

- 009).

For freight rail, the data from AEO2010 Table A

- 7 was used to calculate the growth factor

for 2007

- 2013 to be 0.969, for 2007

- 2017 to be 1.018, and for 2007

- 2020 to be 1.053. We

used th e freight rail annual growth factors for Class I line haul (SCC 22

- 85

- 002

- 006),

Class II/III line haul (SCC 22

- 85

- 002

- 007), and yard switch (SCC 22

- 85

- 002

- 010)

locomotives.

7.3.2 Railroad Control Factors

USEPA developed two scenarios that accounted for both th e 2004 nonroad diesel rule and

the 2008 diesel locomotive rule:

The USEPA baseline (pre

- control) inventory accounted for

1. AEO2006 annual growth in fuel use,

2. The impact of existing regulations for Tier 0, 1, and 2 locomotive engines

that take effect in 2008,

3. The 2004 Clean Air Nonroad Diesel Rule that will decrease allowable

levels of sulfur in locomotives fuel beginning in 2012, and

4. Fleet turnover.

The USEPA controlled inventory accounted for

1. AEO2006 annual growth in fuel use,

2. Reductions included in the baseline inventory, andDocumentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 88



### 3. Reductions from USEPA’s 2008 rule Final Locomotive

- Marine rule for

Tier 3 and 4 engines. This rule lowered diesel sulfur content and tightened

emission standards for existing and new locomotives.

4. V oluntary retrofits under the National Clean Diesel Campaign are not

included in our projections.

To calculate a factor that accounted for reductions included in the USEPA controlled

inventory, it was necessary to first calculate a “growth only” scenario applying USEPA’s

1.6% ann ual growth rate to the 2006 base emissions. Once the growth rate was applied,

then a control factor for each pollutant was calculated by dividing the future year

controlled emissions by the future year “growth only” emissions.

Exhibit 7 .5 shows the cont rol factors for 2017 and 2020 for the five locomotive

classifications and pollutants.

Exhibit 7 .5 Rail Control Factors by Year, Pollutant, and SCC

Year NOx PM10 PM2.5 HC CO VOC SO2

SCC 22

- 85

- 002

- 006 Line Haul Class I Operations

2017 0.633 0.449 0.449 0.480 1.000 0.480 0.003

2020 0.547 0.364 0.364 0.382 1.000 0.382 0.003

SCC 22

- 85

- 002

- 00 7 Line Haul Class I I / III Operations

2017 0.960 0.791 0.791 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.003

2020 0.920 0.752 0.752 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.003

SCC 22

- 85

- 002

- 00 8 Inter

- City Passenger

2017 0.421 0.402 0.402 0.437 0.917 0.437 0.003

2020 0.340 0.294 0.294 0.290 0.895 0.290 0.003

SCC 22

- 85

- 002

- 00 9 Commuter Rail

2017 0.421 0.402 0.402 0.437 0.917 0.437 0.003

2020 0.340 0.294 0.294 0.290 0.895 0.290 0.003

SCC 22

- 85

- 002

- 0 10 Yard / Switch

2017 0.843 0.712 0.712 0.809 1.000 0.809 0.003

2020 0.771 0.650 0.650 0.726 1.000 0.726 0.003Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 89



## 8.0 SUMMARY OF PROJECTED EMISSIONS

8.1 A REA SOURCE PROJECTED EMISSIONS

Exhibits 8.1 to 8.7 summarize the 2007 and projected future year area source emissions by

state for each criteria air pollutant. Seven values are listed for each pollutant:

2007 emissions

2017 projected emissions with growth only (GO)

2017 projected emissions with growth and existing controls (GC)

2017 projected emissions with growth, existing and potential new OTC controls (GX)

2020 projected emissions with growth only (GO)

2020 projected emissions with growth and existing controls (GC)

2020 projected emissions with growth, existing and potential new OTC controls (GX)

Detailed summaries by County and SCC are provided on MARAMA’s ftp site.

CO emissions in most state s decline between 2007 and 2020, primarily due to decreases in

residential wood combustion emissions resulting from the turnover to NSPS

- compliant

wood stoves. The tw o exceptions are DC and NY, where there is a slight increase in CO

emissions from 2007 to 2020. There are no additional reductions expected from potential

new OTC control measures.

NH3 emissions are projected to increase in most state s between 2007 and 2020. This is

due primarily to the growth predicted for fertilizer application on cropland and certain

livestock waste products. There are no additional reductions expected from any existing

control program or any potential new OTC control measures.

Un der the “growth only” scenario, NOx emissions are projected to decline by about 5

percent between 2007 and 2017 due to AEO fuel use projections that generally show

decreases in residential, commercial, and industrial fuel consumption. Under the “existing

controls” scenario, NOx emissions in 2017 are projected to decrease by about 6. 7 percent

regionwide from 2007 levels due primarily to RICE MACT controls. Under the “potential

new OTC controls” scenario, NOx emissions are projected to decrease by about 1 7 percent

between 2007 and 2017 due to potential new controls on ICI boilers and new, small,

natural gas

- fired units.

PM10

- PRI emissions are projected to increase slightly in all state s between 2007 and 20 17

. Reentrained road dust on paved roads is a larg e source of PM10

- PRI emissions and is

directly proportional to the projected increase s in VMT on paved roads. These increases

from paved road dust are somewhat offset by decreases resulting from the turnover to

NSPS

- compliant wood stoves and the AEO fuel use projections that generally showDocumentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 90



### decreases in residential, commercial, and industrial fuel consumption, especially for coal

and oil. There are no additional reductions expected from potential new OTC control

measures.

PM25

- PRI emissions are projected t o increase slightly from 2007 to 2020 . Increases from

paved road dust are somewhat offset by decreases resulting from the turnover to NSPS

compliant wood stoves and the AEO fuel use projections that generally show decreases in

residential, commercial, and industrial fuel consumption, especially for coal and oil. There

are no additional reductions expected from potential new OTC control measures.

Under the “growth only” scenario, SO2 emissions are projected to decline by about 1 6

percent between 2007 and 2 017 due to AEO fuel use projections that generally show

decreases in residential, commercial, and industrial fuel consumption , especially for coal

and oil . Under the “existing controls” scenario, SO2 emissions in 2017 are projected to

decrease by about 42 percent regionwide from 2007 levels due primarily to low sulfur fuel

oil limits in MD, NJ, and NY . Under the “potential new OTC controls” scenario, SO2

emissions are projected to decrease by about 68 percent between 2007 and 2017 due to the

potential imp lementation of low sulfur fuel oil limits in other MANE

- VU state s.

Under the “growth only” scenario, VOC emissions are projected to decrease slightly due to

the turnover to NSPS

- compliant wood stoves and the turnover over of vehicles equipped

with on

- boa rd vapor recovery canisters. Under the “existing controls” scenario, VOC

emissions in 2017 are projected to decrease by about 10 percent regionwide from 2007

levels due implementation of various OTC control measures in multiple states . Under the

“potenti al new OTC controls” scenario, VOC emissions are projected to decrease by about

1 5 percent between 2007 and 2017 due to the continued implementation of both OTC

control measures.Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 91



### Exhibit 8 .1 2007 and Projected Future Year Area Source CO Emissions (tons)

2007 201 7

Growth

Only 201 7

Growth &

Existing

Control s 201 7

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s 20 20

Growth

Only 20 20

Growth &

Existing

Control s 20 20

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s

State 2007 201 7 GO 201 7 GC 2017 G X 20 20 G O 2020 G C 2020 G X

CT 41,496 38,245 38,161 38,161 37,352 37,266 37,266

DE 8,266 7,961 7,881 7,881 7,857 7,776 7,776

DC 5,488 5,319 5,247 5,247 5,274 5,200 5,200

ME 50,496 47,290 47,266 47,266 46,359 46,337 46,337

MD 74,188 72,896 72,631 72,631 72,501 72,231 72,231

MA 79,226 75,912 75,482 75,482 75,073 74,626 74,626

NH 39,677 37,470 37,405 37,405 36,883 36,816 36,816

NJ 77,687 74,444 73,562 73,562 73,298 72,406 72,406

NY 205,055 218,875 218,374 218,374 223,510 223,021 223,021

PA 217,079 205,020 203,489 203,489 202,084 200,507 200,507

RI 15,419 14,391 14,308 14,308 14,097 14,011 14,011

VT 51,109 46,595 46,551 46,551 45,288 45,243 45,243

VA 132,098 129,923 129,479 129,479 129,390 128,937 128,937

997,285 974,342 969,836 969,836 968,966 964,377 964,377Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 92



### Exhibit 8.2 2007 and Projected Future Year Area Source NH3 Emissions (tons)

2007 201 7

Growth

Only 201 7

Growth &

Existing

Control s 201 7

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s 20 20

Growth

Only 20 20

Growth &

Existing

Control s 20 20

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s

State 2007 201 7 GO 201 7 GC 2017 G X 20 20 G O 2020 G C 2020 G X

CT 4,421 4,451 4,451 4,451 4,476 4,476 4,476

DE 12,382 15,233 15,233 15,233 15,924 15,924 15,924

DC 183 188 188 188 191 191 191

ME 5,736 6,203 6,203 6,203 6,337 6,337 6,337

MD 26,006 26,081 26,081 26,081 26,102 26,102 26,102

MA 13,791 13,913 13,913 13,913 13,996 13,996 13,996

NH 1,500 1,528 1,528 1,528 1,534 1,534 1,534

NJ 15,736 16,375 16,375 16,375 16,593 16,593 16,593

NY 45,693 46,221 46,221 46,221 46,368 46,368 46,368

PA 72,569 77,383 77,383 77,383 78,550 78,550 78,550

RI 625 629 629 629 636 636 636

VT 8,013 8,013 8,013 8,013 8,013 8,013 8,013

VA 43,394 45,862 45,862 45,862 46,434 46,434 46,434

250,049 262,079 262,079 262,079 265,152 265,152 265,152Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 93



### Exhibit 8.3 2007 and Projected Future Year Area Source NOx Emissions (tons)

2007 201 7

Growth

Only 201 7

Growth &

Existing

Control s 201 7

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s 20 20

Growth

Only 20 20

Growth &

Existing

Control s 20 20

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s

State 2007 201 7 GO 201 7 GC 2017 G X 20 20 G O 2020 G C 2020 G X

CT 12,421 11,278 11,101 9,747 11,232 11,049 9,560

DE 2,237 2,292 2,210 1,796 2,300 2,218 1,768

DC 1,547 1,620 1,560 1,318 1,654 1,592 1,325

ME 6,656 5,960 5,960 5,734 5,851 5,851 5,633

MD 10,312 11,148 10,948 9,887 11,389 11,185 9,978

MA 20,252 19,316 18,984 16,730 19,498 19,151 16,638

NH 4,737 4,196 4,152 3,761 4,156 4,111 3,699

NJ 24,175 24,662 23,331 22,727 24,685 23,339 22,310

NY 72,053 63,961 63,711 55,057 63,337 63,082 53,872

PA 47,545 47,179 45,925 37,636 47,613 46,318 37,392

RI 3,469 3,370 3,301 2,830 3,400 3,329 2,788

VT 3,996 3,667 3,641 3,305 3,672 3,645 3,302

VA 19,056 18,704 18,411 18,411 18,821 18,520 18,520

228,457 217,352 213,235 188,939 217,608 213,387 186,784Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 94



### Exhibit 8.4 2007 and Projected Future Year Area Source PM10

- PRI Emissions (tons)

2007 201 7

Growth

Only 201 7

Growth &

Existing

Control s 201 7

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s 20 20

Growth

Only 20 20

Growth &

Existing

Control s 20 20

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s

State 2007 201 7 GO 201 7 GC 2017 G X 20 20 G O 2020 G C 2020 G X

CT 30,577 31,061 31,052 31,052 31,224 31,214 31,214

DE 10,499 11,169 11,168 11,168 11,675 11,675 11,675

DC 4,873 5,078 5,077 5,077 5,141 5,141 5,141

ME 54,445 54,438 54,431 54,431 54,995 54,988 54,988

MD 72,454 78,559 78,555 78,555 80,345 80,340 80,340

MA 148,756 148,471 148,459 148,459 148,577 148,564 148,564

NH 27,742 28,916 28,912 28,912 29,420 29,416 29,416

NJ 39,140 41,202 41,189 41,189 42,104 42,090 42,090

NY 272,674 291,578 291,476 291,476 297,738 297,639 297,639

PA 287,998 295,026 295,006 295,006 298,020 298,001 298,001

RI 11,361 12,151 12,150 12,150 12,395 12,394 12,394

VT 47,993 47,675 47,671 47,671 47,823 47,819 47,819

VA 183,341 188,240 188,211 188,211 190,126 190,097 190,097

1,191,853 1,233,566 1,233,356 1,233,356 1,249,581 1,249,377 1,249,377Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 95



### Exhibit 8.5 2007 and Projected Future Year Area Source PM25

- PRI Emissions (tons)

2007 201 7

Growth

Only 201 7

Growth &

Existing

Control s 201 7

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s 20 20

Growth

Only 20 20

Growth &

Existing

Control s 20 20

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s

State 2007 201 7 GO 201 7 GC 2017 G X 20 20 G O 2020 G C 2020 G X

CT 10,606 10,298 10,290 10,290 10,225 10,217 10,217

DE 3,031 3,131 3,131 3,131 3,212 3,212 3,212

DC 1,542 1,560 1,560 1,560 1,567 1,566 1,566

ME 12,526 12,068 12,062 12,062 12,005 11,999 11,999

MD 19,789 20,888 20,884 20,884 21,206 21,201 21,201

MA 30,438 29,955 29,945 29,945 29,893 29,883 29,883

NH 8,623 8,602 8,598 8,598 8,637 8,633 8,633

NJ 18,299 18,453 18,441 18,441 18,579 18,568 18,568

NY 63,906 68,492 68,408 68,408 70,080 70,000 70,000

PA 73,514 73,070 73,054 73,054 73,243 73,227 73,227

RI 3,896 3,923 3,922 3,922 3,937 3,936 3,936

VT 13,106 12,596 12,593 12,593 12,520 12,517 12,517

VA 44,102 44,872 44,851 44,851 45,237 45,216 45,216

303,378 307,908 307,739 307,739 310,340 310,175 310,175Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 96



### Exhibit 8.6 2007 and Projected Future Year Area Source SO2 Emissions (tons)

2007 201 7

Growth

Only 201 7

Growth &

Existing

Control s 201 7

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s 20 20

Growth

Only 20 20

Growth &

Existing

Control s 20 20

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s

State 2007 201 7 GO 201 7 GC 2017 G X 20 20 G O 2020 G C 2020 G X

CT 16,083 12,943 12,943 3,325 12,401 12,401 838

DE 1,144 946 946 107 911 911 106

DC 1,241 995 995 181 953 953 23

ME 9,812 7,870 7,870 1,450 7,609 7,609 200

MD 5,960 6,566 1,674 1,674 6,745 1,704 1,704

MA 19,859 15,996 15,996 4,093 15,357 15,357 1,391

NH 5,283 4,176 4,176 804 3,991 3,991 147

NJ 8,811 7,423 706 706 7,090 704 704

NY 70,044 58,753 11,651 11,651 57,030 11,670 11,670

PA 66,584 55,878 55,878 32,309 55,018 55,018 32,278

RI 3,897 3,222 3,222 1,270 3,108 3,108 491

VT 3,752 3,158 3,158 1,654 3,085 3,085 634

VA 17,098 14,880 14,880 14,880 14,616 14,616 14,616

229,569 192,807 134,097 74,104 187,914 131,127 64,803Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 97



### Exhibit 8.7 2007 and Projected Future Year Area Source VOC Emissions (tons)

2007 201 7

Growth

Only 201 7

Growth &

Existing

Control s 201 7

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s 20 20

Growth

Only 20 20

Growth &

Existing

Control s 20 20

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s

State 2007 201 7 GO 201 7 GC 2017 G X 20 20 G O 2020 G C 2020 G X

CT 57,253 55,386 46,364 43,764 54,857 45,849 43,229

DE 9,482 9,525 8,631 7,910 9,596 8,673 7,930

DC 5,568 5,540 5,324 4,932 5,591 5,369 4,965

ME 31,966 29,957 26,113 25,412 29,422 25,631 24,931

MD 64,429 66,399 57,045 52,018 66,825 57,042 51,901

MA 85,870 82,334 66,211 59,886 81,373 65,306 58,945

NH 22,343 22,117 20,894 17,258 22,041 20,807 17,164

NJ 98,121 97,769 89,972 83,323 97,551 89,699 82,956

NY 195,976 199,975 184,269 173,703 199,522 183,721 173,081

PA 176,781 170,123 164,863 153,166 167,744 162,374 150,596

RI 24,214 22,319 20,292 19,603 21,796 19,750 19,053

VT 14,108 12,516 12,311 10,972 12,127 11,904 10,561

VA 142,218 139,719 135,379 135,379 139,631 135,002 135,002

928,330 913,678 837,668 787,325 908,077 831,128 780,314Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 98



### 8.2 N ON EGU P OINT SOURCE PROJECTED EMISSIONS

Exhibits 8.8 to 8.14 summarize the 2007 and projected future year area source emissions

by state for each criteria air pollutant. Seven values are listed for each pollutant:

2007 emissions

2017 projected emissions with growth only (GO)

2017 projected emissions with growth and existing controls (GC)

2017 projected emissions with growth, existing and potential new OTC controls (GX)

2020 projected emissions with growth only (GO)

2020 projected emissions with growth and existing controls (GC)

2020 projected emissions with growth, existing and potential new OTC controls (GX)

Detailed summaries by County and SCC are provided on MARAMA’s ftp site.

Regionwide, CO emissions increase slightly between 2007 and 2020. Maryland shows a

significant decline due to a source closure. Maine, New Hampshire, and Vermont show

significant increases due to projected increase s in nonEGU wood combustion. There are no

additional reductions expected from potential new OTC control mea sures.

NH3 emissions are projected to increase slightly between 2007 and 2020. There are no

additional reductions expected from any existing control program or any potential new

OTC control measures.

Under the “growth only” scenario, regional NOx emissi ons are projected to increase by

about 12 percent from 2007 to 2017 . This is due partially to the projected increases in fuel

consumption and the addition of ERCs to the inventory . Under the “existing controls”

scenario , NOx emissions are projected to be about 2 percent lower in 2017 than in 2007

because of petroleum refinery enforcement settlements ; source shutdowns; ICI boiler

controls in New Hampshire, New Jersey , and New York; and additional controls on glass

furnace and cement kilns. Under the “pote ntial new OTC controls” scenario, NOx

emissions are projected to be about 5 percent lower in 2017 than in 2007 because of ICI

boiler controls in additional states.

Under the “growth only” scenario, regional PM10

- PRI and PM2.5

- PRI emissions are

projected to increase slightly. Under the “existing controls” scenario, PM10

- PRI and

PM2.5

- PRI are project to be about 5 percent lower in 2017 than in 2007 due primarily to

red u ctions the ICI boiler MACT standard and source closures. There are no additional

reductions expected from potential new OTC control measures.

Under the “growth only” scenario, regional SO2 emissions are projected to remain

relatively constant from 2007 to 2017. Under the “existing controls” scenario, SO2Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 99



### emissions are projected to be about 5 percent lower in 2017 than in 2007 because of

petroleum refinery enforcement settlements; source shutdowns; and low sulfur fuel oil

requirements in Maryland, New Jersey, and New York. Under the “potential new OTC

controls” scenario, SO2 emissions are projected to be about 8 percent lower in 2017 than

in 2007 because of low sulfur fuel oil limits in additional states. SO2 emission are

projected to be about 1 2 percent lower in 2020 than in 2007 because of additional low

sulfur fuel oil limits in o uter zone states that are projected to take effect in 2018..

VOC emissions are projected to increase slightly between 2007 and 2020 under the

“growth only” scenario due primarily to the inclusion of ERCs in the future year

inventories . Under the “exist ing controls” scenario, VOC emissions are projected to be

less than 1 percent lower in 2017 than in 2007, with reductions resulting from the RICE

MACT standard and OTC adhesives application rule. Under the “potential new OTC

controls” scenario, VOC emiss ions are projected to be about 1.5 percent lower in 2017

than in 2007 due to the projected implementation of the OTC rule on large storage tanks.Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 100



### Exhibit 8.8 2007 and Projected Future Year NonEGU CO Emissions (tons)

2007 201 7

Growth

Only 201 7

Growth &

Existing

Control s 201 7

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s 20 20

Growth

Only 20 20

Growth &

Existing

Control s 20 20

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s

State 2007 201 7 GO 201 7 GC 2017 G X 20 20 G O 2020 G C 2020 G X

CT 2,583 3,067 3,041 3,041 3,197 3,171 3,171

DE 7,027 7,300 7,271 7,271 7,320 7,292 7,292

DC 301 335 327 327 338 330 330

ME 14,023 20,975 20,941 20,941 21,238 21,204 21,204

MD 77,574 68,273 68,221 68,221 68,323 68,268 68,268

MA 4,592 5,999 5,919 5,919 6,165 6,082 6,082

NH 2,255 4,977 4,975 4,975 5,084 5,081 5,081

NJ 6,907 7,227 7,151 7,151 7,323 7,246 7,246

NY 52,877 54,959 54,646 54,646 55,439 55,115 55,115

PA 80,540 84,178 83,211 83,211 84,799 83,800 83,800

RI 1,051 873 870 870 940 937 937

VT 702 1,242 1,242 1,242 1,294 1,294 1,294

VA 63,079 67,090 65,740 65,740 67,833 66,212 66,212

313,512 326,496 323,556 323,556 329,293 326,031 326,031Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 101



### Exhibit 8.9 2007 and Projected Future Year NonEGU NH3 Emissions (tons)

2007 201 7

Growth

Only 201 7

Growth &

Existing

Control s 201 7

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s 20 20

Growth

Only 20 20

Growth &

Existing

Control s 20 20

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s

State 2007 201 7 GO 201 7 GC 2017 G X 20 20 G O 2020 G C 2020 G X

CT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

DE 62 63 58 58 63 58 58

DC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

ME 605 588 585 585 569 566 566

MD 137 137 137 137 137 137 137

MA 365 353 353 353 357 357 357

NH 30 36 36 36 36 36 36

NJ 208 216 216 216 219 219 219

NY 1,064 1,083 1,083 1,083 1,086 1,086 1,086

PA 2,070 2,111 2,111 2,111 2,119 2,119 2,119

RI 16 13 13 13 13 13 13

VT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VA 1,618 1,698 1,698 1,698 1,709 1,709 1,709

6,175 6,298 6,290 6,290 6,307 6,300 6,300Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 102



### Exhibit 8.10 2007 and Projected Future Year NonEGU NOx Emissions (tons)

2007 201 7

Growth

Only 201 7

Growth &

Existing

Control s 201 7

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s 20 20

Growth

Only 20 20

Growth &

Existing

Control s 20 20

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s

State 2007 201 7 GO 201 7 GC 2017 G X 20 20 G O 2020 G C 2020 G X

CT 6,302 8,949 8,913 8,531 9,336 9,297 8,900

DE 5,122 4,774 3,328 2,861 4,652 3,271 2,796

DC 734 844 779 598 860 792 609

ME 17,050 20,527 20,398 19,272 20,573 20,447 19,332

MD 23,472 28,520 26,322 25,197 28,694 26,496 25,353

MA 12,872 15,011 14,797 13,238 15,525 15,298 13,695

NH 2,687 5,529 3,388 3,277 5,642 3,467 3,356

NJ 13,517 14,880 11,879 11,879 15,155 12,092 12,092

NY 35,583 38,125 27,632 27,632 38,686 28,080 28,080

PA 71,382 76,378 63,904 61,046 77,220 62,606 59,691

RI 950 857 854 720 868 862 727

VT 441 791 791 743 808 808 761

VA 50,265 53,919 53,236 53,236 54,476 53,591 53,591

240,378 269,103 236,221 228,228 272,496 237,107 228,984Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 103



### Exhibit 8.11 2007 and Projected Future Year NonEGU PM10

- PRI Emissions (tons)

2007 201 7

Growth

Only 201 7

Growth &

Existing

Control s 201 7

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s 20 20

Growth

Only 20 20

Growth &

Existing

Control s 20 20

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s

State 2007 201 7 GO 201 7 GC 2017 G X 20 20 G O 2020 G C 2020 G X

CT 645 702 594 594 717 609 609

DE 1,197 1,140 973 973 1,115 947 947

DC 46 52 29 29 53 30 30

ME 4,748 4,667 4,475 4,475 4,636 4,449 4,449

MD 5,711 6,177 5,498 5,498 6,181 5,502 5,502

MA 3,029 2,927 2,904 2,904 2,977 2,953 2,953

NH 1,141 1,259 1,258 1,258 1,270 1,269 1,269

NJ 3,147 3,381 3,331 3,331 3,444 3,392 3,392

NY 4,463 4,572 4,260 4,260 4,595 4,283 4,283

PA 22,275 22,832 20,891 20,891 22,937 20,996 20,996

RI 173 174 174 174 179 179 179

VT 146 128 128 128 128 128 128

VA 13,028 13,419 12,517 12,517 13,507 12,602 12,602

59,749 61,430 57,032 57,032 61,741 57,339 57,339Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 104



### Exhibit 8.12 2007 and Projected Future Year NonEGU PM25

- PRI Emissions (tons)

2007 201 7

Growth

Only 201 7

Growth &

Existing

Control s 201 7

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s 20 20

Growth

Only 20 20

Growth &

Existing

Control s 20 20

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s

State 2007 201 7 GO 201 7 GC 2017 G X 20 20 G O 2020 G C 2020 G X

CT 573 627 526 526 641 540 540

DE 1,083 1,021 876 876 993 848 848

DC 43 48 28 28 48 29 29

ME 3,727 3,811 3,658 3,658 3,802 3,653 3,653

MD 3,876 4,328 3,764 3,764 4,336 3,772 3,772

MA 2,572 2,495 2,485 2,485 2,542 2,532 2,532

NH 1,061 1,169 1,169 1,169 1,179 1,179 1,179

NJ 2,452 2,583 2,533 2,533 2,625 2,574 2,574

NY 2,415 2,517 2,329 2,329 2,538 2,350 2,350

PA 13,389 13,851 12,729 12,729 13,934 12,845 12,845

RI 124 124 124 124 128 128 128

VT 114 98 98 98 97 97 97

VA 10,296 10,611 9,885 9,885 10,674 9,947 9,947

41,726 43,281 40,204 40,204 43,538 40,492 40,492Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 105



### Exhibit 8.13 2007 and Projected Future Year NonEGU SO2 Emissions (tons)

2007 201 7

Growth

Only 201 7

Growth &

Existing

Control s 201 7

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s 20 20

Growth

Only 20 20

Growth &

Existing

Control s 20 20

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s

State 2007 201 7 GO 201 7 GC 2017 G X 20 20 G O 2020 G C 2020 G X

CT 3,185 3,236 3,236 3,117 3,253 3,253 2,773

DE 8,206 7,883 6,541 5,598 7,703 6,357 5,378

DC 471 510 380 358 518 382 337

ME 15,571 13,194 12,678 12,462 13,049 12,545 6,510

MD 31,176 36,658 34,278 34,278 36,636 34,289 34,289

MA 9,057 8,259 8,041 7,592 8,254 8,041 5,192

NH 2,734 2,655 2,655 2,582 2,658 2,658 1,030

NJ 3,401 3,736 2,591 2,591 3,818 2,645 2,645

NY 44,307 44,712 42,072 42,072 44,792 42,150 42,150

PA 57,330 58,464 53,489 49,814 58,627 53,652 49,975

RI 1,501 1,415 1,415 1,321 1,437 1,437 1,002

VT 316 248 248 243 243 243 92

VA 54,486 55,328 52,044 52,044 55,623 52,338 52,338

231,742 236,297 219,668 214,071 236,610 219,988 203,710Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 106



### Exhibit 8.14 2007 and Projected Future Year NonEGU VOC Emissions (tons)

2007 201 7

Growth

Only 201 7

Growth &

Existing

Control s 201 7

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s 20 20

Growth

Only 20 20

Growth &

Existing

Control s 20 20

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s

State 2007 201 7 GO 201 7 GC 2017 G X 20 20 G O 2020 G C 2020 G X

CT 1,447 1,547 1,530 1,468 1,574 1,556 1,476

DE 3,406 3,068 2,588 2,547 2,972 2,572 2,530

DC 58 60 59 59 60 59 59

ME 4,987 4,931 4,885 4,745 4,760 4,718 4,559

MD 4,598 5,745 5,715 5,466 5,707 5,677 5,367

MA 4,094 4,156 4,102 4,057 4,077 4,022 3,965

NH 807 1,490 1,489 1,448 1,479 1,478 1,440

NJ 10,106 11,044 10,086 10,086 11,180 10,041 10,041

NY 9,772 9,948 9,815 9,640 9,985 9,849 9,635

PA 28,195 29,153 28,712 28,236 29,376 28,925 28,396

RI 922 950 945 919 967 963 930

VT 373 316 316 316 302 302 302

VA 35,018 35,538 35,461 35,461 35,670 35,593 35,593

103,783 107,947 105,705 104,450 108,110 105,755 104,292Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 107



### 8.3 NONROAD NMIM S OURCE PROJECT EMISSIONS

Exhibits 8 .15 to 8

. 21 summarize the 2007 and projected emissions for NONROAD model

sources by state for each criteria air pollutant. Seven values are listed for each pollutant:

2007 emissions

2017 projected emissions with growth only (GO)

2017 projected emissions with growth and existing controls (GC)

2017 projected emissions with growth, existing and potential new OTC controls (GX)

2020 projected emissions with growth only (GO)

2020 projected emissions with growth and existing controls (GC)

2020 projected emissions with growt h, existing and potential new OTC controls (GX)

Detailed summaries by County and SCC are provided on MARAMA’s ftp site.

It is not possible to isolate the emission changes due to growth versus the emission changes

due to future controls in a single NMIM run . Therefore, the emissions under the growth

only (GO) and growth and existing controls (GC) scenarios are the same. There are

currently no potential new OTC control measures for sources whose emissions are

estimated by the NONROAD model. Therefore, the e missions under the growth and

existing controls (GC) and with growth, existing and potential new OTC controls (GX)

scenarios are the same.

Exhibit 8

. 1 5 present s a state

- level comparison of 2007, 2017 and 2020 annual CO

emissions for NMIM/NONROAD sources

. Emissions decrease by about 21% between

2007 and 2013, but remain relatively flat from 201 7 to 2020.

Exhibit 8 .16 shows that annual NH3 emissions are very small relative to other source

sectors (e.g., agricultural ammonia) and generally increase slightly from 2007 to 2020.

Exhibit 8 .17 shows that annual NOx emissions decrease by about 42% between 2007 and

2020 and by about 49% between 2007 and 2020 due to the turnover to newer engines

subject to more stringent national emission standards.

Exhibit s 8 .18 a nd 8 .19 shows that PM10

- PRI and PM25

- PRI emissions decrease about

33% between 2007 and 2020 and by about 41% between 2007 and 2020

.

Exhibit 8 .20 shows that annual SO2 emissions are virtually eliminated by 2017 due to

lower national limits on the sulfur content of nonroad diesel fuel

.

Exhibit 8 .21 shows that annual VOC emissions decrease by about 41% between 2007 and

2020 and by about 46% between 2007 and 2020 due to the turnover to newer engines

subject to more stringent national emission standards.Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 108



### Exhibit 8 .15 2007/2013/2017/2020 NMIM/NONROAD CO Emissions by State (tons)

2007 201 7

Growth

Only 201 7

Growth &

Existing

Control s 201 7

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s 20 20

Growth

Only 20 20

Growth &

Existing

Control s 20 20

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s

State 2007 201 7 GO 201 7 GC 2017 G X 20 20 G O 2020 G C 2020 G X

CT 181,817 143,586 143,586 143,586 147,193 147,193 147,193

DE 55,173 40,188 40,188 40,188 40,703 40,703 40,703

DC 14,319 10,246 10,246 10,246 10,322 10,322 10,322

ME 131,319 92,029 92,029 92,029 90,629 90,629 90,629

MD 297,832 247,766 247,766 247,766 254,083 254,083 254,083

MA 324,793 240,812 240,812 240,812 246,540 246,540 246,540

NH 90,461 73,012 73,012 73,012 73,294 73,294 73,294

NJ 445,302 362,054 362,054 362,054 372,857 372,857 372,857

NY 911,813 716,153 716,153 716,153 730,897 730,897 730,897

PA 719,517 533,798 533,798 533,798 542,133 542,133 542,133

RI 54,028 35,863 35,863 35,863 36,713 36,713 36,713

VT 52,497 35,978 35,978 35,978 35,608 35,608 35,608

VA 415,093 335,531 335,531 335,531 341,458 341,458 341,458

3,693,965 2,867,016 2,867,016 2,867,016 2,922,431 2,922,431 2,922,431Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 109



### Exhibit 8 .16 2007/2013/2017/2020 NMIM/NONROAD NH3 Emissions by State (tons)

2007 201 7

Growth

Only 201 7

Growth &

Existing

Control s 201 7

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s 20 20

Growth

Only 20 20

Growth &

Existing

Control s 20 20

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s

State 2007 201 7 GO 201 7 GC 2017 G X 20 20 G O 2020 G C 2020 G X

CT 16 20 20 20 21 21 21

DE 6 6 6 6 7 7 7

DC 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

ME 13 15 15 15 15 15 15

MD 29 35 35 35 37 37 37

MA 28 34 34 34 36 36 36

NH 10 12 12 12 13 13 13

NJ 40 47 47 47 50 50 50

NY 83 99 99 99 105 105 105

PA 60 71 71 71 74 74 74

RI 5 5 5 5 5 5 5

VT 5 6 6 6 6 6 6

VA 45 53 53 53 55 55 55

342 405 405 405 427 427 427Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 110



### Exhibit 8 .17 2007/2013/2017/2020 NMIM/NONROAD NOx Emissions by State (tons)

2007 201 7

Growth

Only 201 7

Growth &

Existing

Control s 201 7

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s 20 20

Growth

Only 20 20

Growth &

Existing

Control s 20 20

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s

State 2007 201 7 GO 201 7 GC 2017 G X 20 20 G O 2020 G C 2020 G X

CT 16,056 8,748 8,748 8,748 7,786 7,786 7,786

DE 4,998 3,096 3,096 3,096 2,723 2,723 2,723

DC 2,788 1,534 1,534 1,534 1,250 1,250 1,250

ME 7,439 5,216 5,216 5,216 4,783 4,783 4,783

MD 25,726 15,357 15,357 15,357 13,481 13,481 13,481

MA 26,471 14,820 14,820 14,820 13,163 13,163 13,163

NH 8,562 5,530 5,530 5,530 5,277 5,277 5,277

NJ 36,345 20,713 20,713 20,713 18,361 18,361 18,361

NY 72,271 43,490 43,490 43,490 38,871 38,871 38,871

PA 55,362 30,467 30,467 30,467 26,182 26,182 26,182

RI 4,388 2,348 2,348 2,348 2,114 2,114 2,114

VT 3,743 2,364 2,364 2,364 2,109 2,109 2,109

VA 41,325 23,658 23,658 23,658 20,189 20,189 20,189

305,475 177,343 177,343 177,343 156,288 156,288 156,288Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 111



### Exhibit 8 .18 2007/2013/2017/2020 NMIM/NONROAD PM10

- PRI Emissions by State

(tons)

2007 201 7

Growth

Only 201 7

Growth &

Existing

Control s 201 7

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s 20 20

Growth

Only 20 20

Growth &

Existing

Control s 20 20

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s

State 2007 201 7 GO 201 7 GC 2017 G X 20 20 G O 2020 G C 2020 G X

CT 1,412 976 976 976 868 868 868

DE 476 300 300 300 258 258 258

DC 242 138 138 138 106 106 106

ME 1,151 810 810 810 706 706 706

MD 2,600 1,781 1,781 1,781 1,570 1,570 1,570

MA 2,384 1,630 1,630 1,630 1,438 1,438 1,438

NH 846 595 595 595 527 527 527

NJ 3,377 2,347 2,347 2,347 2,086 2,086 2,086

NY 7,059 4,684 4,684 4,684 4,075 4,075 4,075

PA 5,623 3,717 3,717 3,717 3,217 3,217 3,217

RI 367 229 229 229 202 202 202

VT 482 327 327 327 281 281 281

VA 4,128 2,695 2,695 2,695 2,319 2,319 2,319

30,146 20,229 20,229 20,229 17,652 17,652 17,652Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 112



### Exhibit 8 .19 2007/2013/2017/2020 NMIM/NONROAD PM25

- PRI Emissions by State

(tons)

2007 201 7

Growth

Only 201 7

Growth &

Existing

Control s 201 7

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s 20 20

Growth

Only 20 20

Growth &

Existing

Control s 20 20

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s

State 2007 201 7 GO 201 7 GC 2017 G X 20 20 G O 2020 G C 2020 G X

CT 1,343 922 922 922 818 818 818

DE 453 284 284 284 243 243 243

DC 234 132 132 132 102 102 102

ME 1,080 756 756 756 657 657 657

MD 2,473 1,681 1,681 1,681 1,477 1,477 1,477

MA 2,268 1,540 1,540 1,540 1,355 1,355 1,355

NH 799 559 559 559 494 494 494

NJ 3,213 2,217 2,217 2,217 1,964 1,964 1,964

NY 6,715 4,430 4,430 4,430 3,843 3,843 3,843

PA 5,346 3,511 3,511 3,511 3,029 3,029 3,029

RI 349 216 216 216 191 191 191

VT 455 307 307 307 263 263 263

VA 3,933 2,549 2,549 2,549 2,185 2,185 2,185

28,660 19,105 19,105 19,105 16,621 16,621 16,621Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 113



### Exhibit 8 .20 2007/2013/2017/2020 NMIM/NONROAD SO2 Emissions by State (tons)

2007 201 7

Growth

Only 201 7

Growth &

Existing

Control s 201 7

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s 20 20

Growth

Only 20 20

Growth &

Existing

Control s 20 20

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s

State 2007 201 7 GO 201 7 GC 2017 G X 20 20 G O 2020 G C 2020 G X

CT 802 30 30 30 32 32 32

DE 266 7 7 7 7 7 7

DC 196 3 3 3 3 3 3

ME 416 16 16 16 17 17 17

MD 1,436 36 36 36 38 38 38

MA 1,377 41 41 41 44 44 44

NH 441 16 16 16 18 18 18

NJ 1,905 55 55 55 58 58 58

NY 3,957 118 118 118 126 126 126

PA 2,972 84 84 84 86 86 86

RI 211 7 7 7 7 7 7

VT 202 7 7 7 7 7 7

VA 2,284 90 90 90 94 94 94

16,464 511 511 511 537 537 537Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 114



### Exhibit 8 .21 2007/2013/2017/2020 NMIM/NONROAD VOC Emissions by State

(tons)

2007 201 7

Growth

Only 201 7

Growth &

Existing

Control s 201 7

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s 20 20

Growth

Only 20 20

Growth &

Existing

Control s 20 20

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s

State 2007 201 7 GO 201 7 GC 2017 G X 20 20 G O 2020 G C 2020 G X

CT 20,721 11,803 11,803 11,803 10,985 10,985 10,985

DE 7,157 3,888 3,888 3,888 3,498 3,498 3,498

DC 1,324 749 749 749 710 710 710

ME 29,880 19,303 19,303 19,303 16,729 16,729 16,729

MD 35,160 21,226 21,226 21,226 19,890 19,890 19,890

MA 35,676 20,510 20,510 20,510 18,990 18,990 18,990

NH 17,108 11,030 11,030 11,030 9,785 9,785 9,785

NJ 47,521 27,430 27,430 27,430 25,802 25,802 25,802

NY 114,935 67,238 67,238 67,238 60,945 60,945 60,945

PA 86,397 51,382 51,382 51,382 46,399 46,399 46,399

RI 6,721 2,885 2,885 2,885 2,657 2,657 2,657

VT 10,339 6,714 6,714 6,714 5,864 5,864 5,864

VA 55,135 32,141 32,141 32,141 29,303 29,303 29,303

468,074 276,299 276,299 276,299 251,556 251,556 251,556Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 115



### 8.4 NONROAD COMMERCIAL MARINE VESSEL EMISSIONS

Exhibits 8 .22 to 8

. 28 summarize the 2007 and projected future year commercial marine

vessel emissions by state for each criteria air pollutant. Seven values are listed for each

pollutant:

2007 emissions

201 7 projected emissions with growth only (GO)

201 7 projected emissions with growth and existing control s (GC)

2017 projected emissions with growth

, existing and potential new OTC controls (G X )

20 20 projected emissions with growth only (GO)

2020 projected emissions with growth and existing controls (G C )

2020 projected emissio ns with growth , existing and potential new OTC c ontrol s (G X )

Detailed summaries by County and SCC are provided on MARAMA’s ftp site.

Emissions of all pollutants except NH3 are projected to decrease as a result of Federal

rules affecting Category 1 / 2 and Category 3 marine engines, including more stringent

engine emission standards and sulfur in fuel limitations. There are currently no potential

new OTC control measures for commercial marine vessels.

Exhibit 8. 2 2 present s a state

- level comparison of 2007, 2017 and 2020 annual CO

emissions for commercial marine vessels

. Emissions decrease by about 1 3 percent from

2007 to 2017, and 1 2 percent from 2007 to 2020.

Exhibit 8. 23 shows that there are very little NH3 emissions from this sector.

Exhibit 8. 24 shows that annual NOx emissions from commercial marine vessels decrease

by 32 percent from 2007 to 2017 and 40 percent from 2007 to 2020.

Exhibits 9.25 and 9.26 show that annual PM10

- PRI and PM2.5

- PRI emissions from

commercial marine vessels decrease substantially after 2007. For both pollutants,

emissions are reduced by about 5 7 percent from 2007 to 2017 and 6 6 percent from 2007 to

2020.

Exhibit 8. 27 shows that that annual SO2 emissions from commercial marine vessels

decrease dramatically after 2007 . SO2 emissions are reduced by about 89 percent from

2007 to 2017 and 93 percent from 2007 to 2020.

Exhibit 8. 28 shows that annual VOC emissions from commercial marine vessels decrease

by 15 percent from 2007 to 2017, and 2 0 percent from 2007 to 2020.Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 116



### Ex hibit 8. 22 2007 and Projected CO Emissions for CMV (tons)

2007 201 7

Growth

Only 201 7

Growth &

Existing

Control s 201 7

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s 20 20

Growth

Only 20 20

Growth &

Existing

Control s 20 20

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s

State 2007 201 7 GO 201 7 GC 2017 G X 20 20 G O 2020 G C 2020 G X

CT 1,078 1,073 912 912 1,102 908 908

DE 554 543 485 485 554 484 484

DC 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

ME 522 521 438 438 536 435 435

MD 2,795 2,792 2,350 2,350 2,871 2,337 2,337

MA 1,473 1,475 1,232 1,232 1,518 1,225 1,225

NH 89 84 83 83 85 84 84

NJ 1,619 2,202 2,067 2,067 2,427 2,254 2,254

NY 3,476 3,452 2,961 2,961 3,541 2,949 2,949

PA 1,294 1,283 1,106 1,106 1,315 1,102 1,102

RI 522 523 437 437 538 434 434

VT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VA 3,735 3,731 3,166 3,166 3,831 3,150 3,150

17,156 17,681 15,238 15,238 18,319 15,363 15,363Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 117



### Exhibit 8. 23 2007 and Projected NH3 Emissions for CMV (tons)

2007 201 7

Growth

Only 201 7

Growth &

Existing

Control s 201 7

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s 20 20

Growth

Only 20 20

Growth &

Existing

Control s 20 20

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s

State 2007 201 7 GO 201 7 GC 2017 G X 20 20 G O 2020 G C 2020 G X

CT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

DE 0 0 0 0 0 0

DC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

ME 0 0 0 0 0 0

MD 8 8 8 8 8 8 8

MA 0 0 0 0 0 0

NH 0 0 0 0 0 0

NJ 8 11 11 11 12 12 12

NY 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

PA 13 12 12 12 13 13 13

RI 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

VT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VA 9 9 9 9 9 9 9

44 46 46 46 47 47 47Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 118



### Exhibit 8. 24 2007 and Projected NOx Emissions for CMV (tons)

2007 201 7

Growth

Only 201 7

Growth &

Existing

Control s 201 7

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s 20 20

Growth

Only 20 20

Growth &

Existing

Control s 20 20

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s

State 2007 201 7 GO 201 7 GC 2017 G X 20 20 G O 2020 G C 2020 G X

CT 6,528 6,454 4,162 4,162 6,608 3,642 3,642

DE 5,095 4,966 3,217 3,217 5,054 2,857 2,857

DC 6 6 4 4 6 3 3

ME 1,659 1,638 1,057 1,057 1,676 926 926

MD 16,027 15,929 10,256 10,256 16,343 8,922 8,922

MA 3,246 3,247 2,086 2,086 3,340 1,803 1,803

NH 271 258 169 169 260 154 154

NJ 11,197 15,318 11,140 11,140 16,906 10,251 10,251

NY 28,180 27,913 17,990 17,990 28,598 15,709 15,709

PA 11,378 11,237 7,249 7,249 11,498 6,350 6,350

RI 2,829 2,825 1,816 1,816 2,904 1,572 1,572

VT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VA 21,760 21,643 14,445 14,445 22,172 12,750 12,750

108,175 111,435 73,591 73,591 115,365 64,937 64,937Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 119



### Exhibit 8. 25 2007 and Projected PM10

- PRI Emissions for CMV (tons)

2007 201 7

Growth

Only 201 7

Growth &

Existing

Control s 201 7

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s 20 20

Growth

Only 20 20

Growth &

Existing

Control s 20 20

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s

State 2007 201 7 GO 201 7 GC 2017 G X 20 20 G O 2020 G C 2020 G X

CT 312 305 124 124 310 101 101

DE 327 315 99 99 319 75 75

DC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

ME 395 384 144 144 391 114 114

MD 657 649 301 301 664 251 251

MA 316 315 162 162 323 138 138

NH 13 12 3 3 13 2 2

NJ 622 887 244 244 989 241 241

NY 1,671 1,649 753 753 1,686 626 626

PA 524 511 197 197 519 158 158

RI 112 112 55 55 115 47 47

VT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VA 947 934 461 461 953 394 394

5,897 6,072 2,543 2,543 6,283 2,146 2,146Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 120



### Exhibit 8. 26 2007 and Projected PM25

- PRI Emissions for CMV (tons)

2007 201 7

Growth

Only 201 7

Growth &

Existing

Control s 201 7

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s 20 20

Growth

Only 20 20

Growth &

Existing

Control s 20 20

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s

State 2007 201 7 GO 201 7 GC 2017 G X 20 20 G O 2020 G C 2020 G X

CT 296 290 119 119 295 97 97

DE 305 294 93 93 297 70 70

DC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

ME 364 354 132 132 359 105 105

MD 606 600 285 285 614 239 239

MA 290 289 149 149 297 127 127

NH 12 11 3 3 12 2 2

NJ 575 820 225 225 915 223 223

NY 1,541 1,520 695 695 1,555 578 578

PA 484 472 183 183 480 146 146

RI 108 107 53 53 110 45 45

VT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VA 908 896 446 446 915 383 383

5,491 5,654 2,384 2,384 5,851 2,016 2,016Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 121



### Exhibit 8. 27 2007 and Projected SO2 Emissions for CMV (tons)

2007 201 7

Growth

Only 201 7

Growth &

Existing

Control s 201 7

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s 20 20

Growth

Only 20 20

Growth &

Existing

Control s 20 20

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s

State 2007 201 7 GO 201 7 GC 2017 G X 20 20 G O 2020 G C 2020 G X

CT 1,386 1,327 147 147 1,341 60 60

DE 2,079 1,984 225 225 2,000 84 84

DC 1 1 0 0 1 0 0

ME 189 185 17 17 189 12 12

MD 2,170 2,099 217 217 2,128 109 109

MA 698 684 64 64 698 42 42

NH 506 482 55 55 486 20 20

NJ 6,712 10,085 403 403 11,405 452 452

NY 9,321 9,181 821 821 9,383 601 601

PA 3,067 2,909 343 343 2,925 111 111

RI 632 607 66 66 613 28 28

VT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VA 4,058 3,928 940 940 3,969 747 747

30,820 33,473 3,296 3,296 35,139 2,268 2,268Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 122



### Exhibit 8. 28 2007 and Projected VOC Emissions for CMV (tons)

2007 201 7

Growth

Only 201 7

Growth &

Existing

Control s 201 7

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s 20 20

Growth

Only 20 20

Growth &

Existing

Control s 20 20

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s

State 2007 201 7 GO 201 7 GC 2017 G X 20 20 G O 2020 G C 2020 G X

CT 

### 161 158 127 127 162 117 117

DE 

### 158 153 133 133 156 127 127

DC 

### 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

ME 

### 234 234 168 168 240 145 145

MD 

### 371 367 282 282 376 252 252

MA 

### 528 529 381 381 544 328 328

NH 

### 23 21 21 21 22 21 21

NJ 

### 658 857 753 753 933 754 754

NY 

### 1,906 1,895 1,681 1,681 1,918 1,606 1,606

PA 

### 538 534 406 406 547 360 360

RI 

### 64 64 47 47 66 42 42

VT 

### 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VA 

### 523 518 409 409 530 370 370

5,164 5,331 4,410 4,410 5,493 4,121 4,121Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 123



### 8.5 NONROAD AIRPORT EMISSIONS

Exhibits 9.29 to 9.35 summarize the 2007 and projected future year airport emissions by

state for each criteria air pollutant. Seven values are listed for each pollutant:

2007 emissions

2017 projected emissions with growth only (GO)

2017 projected emissions with growth and existing controls (GC)

2017 projected emissions with growth, existing and potential new OTC controls (GX)

2020 projected emissions with growth only (GO)

2020 projected emissions with growth and existing controls (GC)

2020 projected emissions with growth, existing and potential new OTC controls (GX)

Detailed summaries by County and SCC are provided on MARAMA’s ftp site.

There were no NH3 emissions reported for airport operations. Emissions of other

pollutants are projected to change as a result of changes in airline activity levels. No state

or Federal rules were identified tha t would reduce emissions from aircraft operations in the

future. There are currently no potential new OTC control measures for airports.

CO , PM10

, PM2.5 and VOC emissions are projected to remain relatively constant between

2007 levels by 2017. By 2020, t he will be a slight increase in emissions from 2007 due to

increase d operations by 2020.

NOx and SO2 emissions are project ed to increase by 7 percent from 2007 levels by 2017

and by 13 percent by 2020 due to increased air traffic.Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 124



### Exhibit 8. 29 2007 and Projected CO Emissions for Airports (tons)

2007 201 7

Growth

Only 201 7

Growth &

Existing

Control s 201 7

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s 20 20

Growth

Only 20 20

Growth &

Existing

Control s 20 20

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s

State 2007 201 7 GO 201 7 GC 2017 G X 20 20 G O 2020 G C 2020 G X

CT 4,659 4,224 4,224 4,224 4,386 4,386 4,386

DE 1,625 1,550 1,550 1,550 1,593 1,593 1,593

DC 14 14 14 14 14 14 14

ME 32,879 32,774 32,774 32,774 32,802 32,802 32,802

MD 10,265 10,042 10,042 10,042 10,335 10,335 10,335

MA 15,495 14,592 14,592 14,592 14,940 14,940 14,940

NH 2,089 1,861 1,861 1,861 1,883 1,883 1,883

NJ 21,878 21,837 21,837 21,837 22,411 22,411 22,411

NY 17,403 18,579 18,579 18,579 19,706 19,706 19,706

PA 26,540 26,165 26,165 26,165 27,345 27,345 27,345

RI 1,739 2,255 2,255 2,255 2,280 2,280 2,280

VT 2,420 2,100 2,100 2,100 2,127 2,127 2,127

VA 22,009 22,689 22,689 22,689 23,190 23,190 23,190

159,016 158,684 158,684 158,684 163,012 163,012 163,012Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 125



### Exhibit 8. 30 2007 and Projected NH3 Emissions for Airports (tons)

2007 201 7

Growth

Only 201 7

Growth &

Existing

Control s 201 7

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s 20 20

Growth

Only 20 20

Growth &

Existing

Control s 20 20

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s

State 2007 201 7 GO 201 7 GC 2017 G X 20 20 G O 2020 G C 2020 G X

CT 

### 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

DE 

### 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

DC 

### 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

ME 

### 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

MD 

### 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

MA 

### 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

NH 

### 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

NJ 

### 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

NY 

### 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

PA 

### 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

RI 

### 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VT 

### 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VA 

### 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 126



### Exhibit 8. 31 2007 and Projected NOx Emissions for Airports (tons)

2007 201 7

Growth

Only 201 7

Growth &

Existing

Control s 201 7

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s 20 20

Growth

Only 20 20

Growth &

Existing

Control s 20 20

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s

State 2007 201 7 GO 201 7 GC 2017 G X 20 20 G O 2020 G C 2020 G X

CT 713 657 657 657 688 688 688

DE 805 801 801 801 802 802 802

DC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

ME 134 144 144 144 144 144 144

MD 1,910 2,021 2,021 2,021 2,119 2,119 2,119

MA 3,190 3,267 3,267 3,267 3,365 3,365 3,365

NH 278 256 256 256 260 260 260

NJ 5,105 5,408 5,408 5,408 5,612 5,612 5,612

NY 6,998 8,081 8,081 8,081 8,789 8,789 8,789

PA 3,738 4,094 4,094 4,094 4,406 4,406 4,406

RI 289 281 281 281 294 294 294

VT 103 113 113 113 117 117 117

VA 5,520 5,762 5,762 5,762 5,889 5,889 5,889

28,783 30,885 30,885 30,885 32,485 32,485 32,485Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 127



### Exhibit 8. 32 2007 and Projected PM10

- PRI Emissions for Airports (tons)

2007 201 7

Growth

Only 201 7

Growth &

Existing

Control s 201 7

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s 20 20

Growth

Only 20 20

Growth &

Existing

Control s 20 20

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s

State 2007 201 7 GO 201 7 GC 2017 G X 20 20 G O 2020 G C 2020 G X

CT 66 59 59 59 61 61 61

DE 27 25 25 25 25 25 25

DC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

ME 83 82 82 82 82 82 82

MD 74 70 70 70 73 73 73

MA 295 284 284 284 289 289 289

NH 37 34 34 34 34 34 34

NJ 170 173 173 173 177 177 177

NY 140 158 158 158 170 170 170

PA 396 385 385 385 400 400 400

RI 22 33 33 33 33 33 33

VT 46 40 40 40 40 40 40

VA 821 840 840 840 847 847 847

2,176 2,183 2,183 2,183 2,234 2,234 2,234Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 128



### Exhibit 8. 33 2007 and Projected PM25

- PRI Emissions for Airports (tons)

2007 201 7

Growth

Only 201 7

Growth &

Existing

Control s 201 7

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s 20 20

Growth

Only 20 20

Growth &

Existing

Control s 20 20

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s

State 2007 201 7 GO 201 7 GC 2017 G X 20 20 G O 2020 G C 2020 G X

CT 51 46 46 46 48 48 48

DE 19 17 17 17 18 18 18

DC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

ME 61 61 61 61 61 61 61

MD 16 17 17 17 17 17 17

MA 215 208 208 208 212 212 212

NH 27 25 25 25 25 25 25

NJ 143 146 146 146 150 150 150

NY 139 157 157 157 170 170 170

PA 294 288 288 288 300 300 300

RI 17 25 25 25 25 25 25

VT 32 28 28 28 29 29 29

VA 580 595 595 595 601 601 601

1,595 1,613 1,613 1,613 1,656 1,656 1,656Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 129



### Exhibit 8. 34 2007 and Projected SO2 Emissions for Airports (tons)

2007 201 7

Growth

Only 201 7

Growth &

Existing

Control s 201 7

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s 20 20

Growth

Only 20 20

Growth &

Existing

Control s 20 20

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s

State 2007 201 7 GO 201 7 GC 2017 G X 20 20 G O 2020 G C 2020 G X

CT 96 87 87 87 91 91 91

DE 55 55 55 55 55 55 55

DC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

ME 14 16 16 16 16 16 16

MD 247 255 255 255 266 266 266

MA 218 226 226 226 236 236 236

NH 28 26 26 26 26 26 26

NJ 507 534 534 534 557 557 557

NY 699 808 808 808 877 877 877

PA 416 455 455 455 488 488 488

RI 30 29 29 29 31 31 31

VT 12 13 13 13 13 13 13

VA 424 455 455 455 466 466 466

2,746 2,959 2,959 2,959 3,122 3,122 3,122Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 130



### Exhibit 8. 35 2007 and Projected VOC Emissions for Airports (tons)

2007 201 7

Growth

Only 201 7

Growth &

Existing

Control s 201 7

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s 20 20

Growth

Only 20 20

Growth &

Existing

Control s 20 20

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s

State 2007 201 7 GO 201 7 GC 2017 G X 20 20 G O 2020 G C 2020 G X

CT 509 452 452 452 469 469 469

DE 620 598 598 598 600 600 600

DC 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

ME 161 161 161 161 162 162 162

MD 1,365 1,228 1,228 1,228 1,265 1,265 1,265

MA 1,129 1,080 1,080 1,080 1,105 1,105 1,105

NH 134 116 116 116 118 118 118

NJ 2,438 2,426 2,426 2,426 2,498 2,498 2,498

NY 1,571 1,761 1,761 1,761 1,896 1,896 1,896

PA 2,813 2,879 2,879 2,879 3,004 3,004 3,004

RI 112 166 166 166 168 168 168

VT 204 179 179 179 181 181 181

VA 2,764 2,764 2,764 2,764 2,802 2,802 2,802

13,822 13,813 13,813 13,813 14,269 14,269 14,269Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 131



### 8.6 NONROAD RAILROAD LOCOMOTIVE EMISSIONS

Exhibits 9.36 to 9.42 summarize the 2007 and projected future year railroad locomotive

emissions by state for each criteria air pollutant. Seven values are listed for each pollutant:

2007 emissions

2017 projected emissions with growth only (GO)

2017 projected emissions with growth and existing controls (GC)

2017 projected emissions with growth, existing and potential new OTC controls (GX)

2020 projected emissions with growth only (GO)

2020 projected emissions with growth and existing controls (GC)

202 0 projected emissions with growth, existing and potential new OTC controls (GX)

Detailed summaries by County and SCC are provided on MARAMA’s ftp site.

Emissions of all pollutants except CO and NH3 are projected to decrease as a result of

Federal rules aff

ecting railroad locomotive engines, including more stringent engine

emission standards and sulfur in fuel limitations. There are currently no potential new

OTC control measures for railroad locomotives.

Exhibit 8. 36 present s a state

- level comparison of 20 07, 2017 and 2020 annual CO

emissions for railroad locomotives

. CO e missions show small changes (< 7 percent)

between 2007 and 2017/ 2020

.

Exhibit 8. 37 shows that there are very little NH3 emissions from this sector.

Exhibit 8. 38 shows that annual NOx emis sions from railroad locomotives decrease by 3 3

percent from 2007 to 2017, and 39 percent from 2007 to 2020.

Exhibits 9. 39 and 9. 40 show that annual PM10

- PRI and PM2.5

- PRI emissions from

railroad locomotives decrease substantially after 2007. For both poll utants, emissions are

reduced by about 49 percent from 2007 to 2017, and 57 percent from 2007 to 2020.

Exhibit 8. 41 shows that SO2 emissions from railroad locomotives are virtually eliminatd

by 20 1 7

.

Exhibit 8. 42 shows that annual VOC emissions from rail road locomotives decrease by 4 2

percent from 2007 to 2017 and 5 0 percent from 2007 to 2020.Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 132



### Exhibit 8. 36 2007 and Projected CO Emissions for Railroads (tons)

2007 201 7

Growth

Only 201 7

Growth &

Existing

Control s 201 7

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s 20 20

Growth

Only 20 20

Growth &

Existing

Control s 20 20

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s

State 2007 201 7 GO 201 7 GC 2017 G X 20 20 G O 2020 G C 2020 G X

CT 184 198 188 188 206 193 193

DE 75 76 76 76 79 79 79

DC 73 75 75 75 78 77 77

ME 188 191 191 191 198 198 198

MD 700 720 713 713 746 736 736

MA 646 695 662 662 723 679 679

NH 88 90 90 90 93 93 93

NJ 665 780 744 744 818 771 771

NY 3,061 3,181 3,122 3,122 3,298 3,220 3,220

PA 2,987 3,044 3,041 3,041 3,149 3,145 3,145

RI 15 15 15 15 16 16 16

VT 72 74 74 74 76 76 76

VA 2,701 2,758 2,750 2,750 2,854 2,843 2,843

11,456 11,899 11,741 11,741 12,333 12,126 12,126Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 133



### Exhibit 8. 37 2007 and Projected NH3 Emissions for Railroads (tons)

2007 201 7

Growth

Only 201 7

Growth &

Existing

Control s 201 7

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s 20 20

Growth

Only 20 20

Growth &

Existing

Control s 20 20

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s

State 2007 201 7 GO 201 7 GC 2017 G X 20 20 G O 2020 G C 2020 G X

CT 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

DE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

DC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

ME 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

MD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

MA 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

NH 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

NJ 2 2 2 2 3 3 3

NY 0 1 1 1 1 1 1

PA 9 9 9 9 10 10 10

RI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VA 8 8 8 8 9 9 9

23 24 24 24 25 25 25Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 134



### Exhibit 8. 38 2007 and Projected NOx Emissions for Railroads (tons)

2007 201 7

Growth

Only 201 7

Growth &

Existing

Control s 201 7

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s 20 20

Growth

Only 20 20

Growth &

Existing

Control s 20 20

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s

State 2007 201 7 GO 201 7 GC 2017 G X 20 20 G O 2020 G C 2020 G X

CT 

### 1,723 1,866 1,088 1,088 1,942 991 991

DE 

### 384 391 279 279 404 256 256

DC 

### 505 521 353 353 540 322 322

ME 

### 1,369 1,394 1,289 1,289 1,442 1,262 1,262

MD 

### 4,767 4,904 3,127 3,127 5,078 2,815 2,815

MA 

### 6,133 6,623 3,743 3,743 6,893 3,368 3,368

NH 

### 891 907 871 871 939 864 864

NJ 

### 5,957 6,982 3,839 3,839 7,323 3,469 3,469

NY 

### 20,675 21,473 13,144 13,144 22,259 11,782 11,782

PA 

### 20,675 21,080 14,413 14,413 21,808 13,174 13,174

RI 

### 144 147 99 99 152 90 90

VT 

### 736 749 719 719 775 713 713

VA 

### 18,319 18,728 12,061 12,061 19,381 10,856 10,856

82,279 85,765 55,025 55,025 88,936 49,960 49,960Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 135



### Exhibit 8. 39 2007 and Projected PM10

- PRI Emissions for Railroads (tons)

2007 201 7

Growth

Only 201 7

Growth &

Existing

Control s 201 7

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s 20 20

Growth

Only 20 20

Growth &

Existing

Control s 20 20

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s

State 2007 201 7 GO 201 7 GC 2017 G X 20 20 G O 2020 G C 2020 G X

CT 46 49 27 27 51 23 23

DE 15 16 8 8 16 7 7

DC 12 12 6 6 13 6 6

ME 28 28 22 22 29 21 21

MD 166 171 80 80 177 68 68

MA 159 171 84 84 178 71 71

NH 22 22 18 18 23 17 17

NJ 160 187 89 89 196 75 75

NY 608 631 295 295 654 249 249

PA 704 717 356 356 742 309 309

RI 4 4 2 2 4 2 2

VT 18 18 15 15 19 14 14

VA 634 648 303 303 670 257 257

2,574 2,675 1,303 1,303 2,772 1,119 1,119Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 136



### Exhibit 8. 40 2007 and Projected PM25

- PRI Emissions for Railroads (tons)

2007 201 7

Growth

Only 201 7

Growth &

Existing

Control s 201 7

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s 20 20

Growth

Only 20 20

Growth &

Existing

Control s 20 20

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s

State 2007 201 7 GO 201 7 GC 2017 G X 20 20 G O 2020 G C 2020 G X

CT 39 42 22 22 44 19 19

DE 15 15 8 8 16 7 7

DC 11 12 6 6 12 6 6

ME 25 26 20 20 27 19 19

MD 161 166 78 78 172 66 66

MA 145 157 77 77 163 65 65

NH 21 21 17 17 22 17 17

NJ 147 173 82 82 181 69 69

NY 572 595 278 278 616 235 235

PA 650 663 330 330 686 286 286

RI 3 3 2 2 3 1 1

VT 17 17 13 13 18 13 13

VA 586 599 280 280 620 238 238

2,395 2,488 1,213 1,213 2,579 1,041 1,041Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 137



### Exhibit 8. 41 2007 and Projected SO2 Emissions for Railroads (tons)

2007 201 7

Growth

Only 201 7

Growth &

Existing

Control s 201 7

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s 20 20

Growth

Only 20 20

Growth &

Existing

Control s 20 20

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s

State 2007 201 7 GO 201 7 GC 2017 G X 20 20 G O 2020 G C 2020 G X

CT 57 61 5 5 64 5 5

DE 5 5 0 0 6 0 0

DC 37 38 0 0 39 0 0

ME 92 94 0 0 97 0 0

MD 64 66 0 0 68 0 0

MA 66 70 0 0 73 0 0

NH 10 10 0 0 11 0 0

NJ 52 61 0 0 64 0 0

NY 616 641 2 2 665 2 2

PA 211 216 1 1 223 1 1

RI 5 6 0 0 6 0 0

VT 5 5 0 0 5 0 0

VA 192 196 1 1 203 1 1

1,413 1,469 9 9 1,522 10 10Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 138



### Exhibit 8. 42 2007 and Projected VOC Emissions for Railroads (tons)

2007 201 7

Growth

Only 201 7

Growth &

Existing

Control s 201 7

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s 20 20

Growth

Only 20 20

Growth &

Existing

Control s 20 20

Growth &

Existing &

New OTC

Control s

State 2007 201 7 GO 201 7 GC 2017 G X 20 20 G O 2020 G C 2020 G X

CT 73 79 49 49 82 42 42

DE 28 29 17 17 30 15 15

DC 34 35 23 23 36 20 20

ME 51 51 47 47 53 47 47

MD 271 279 146 146 289 122 122

MA 267 286 162 162 298 135 135

NH 35 36 36 36 37 37 37

NJ 258 302 216 216 317 200 200

NY 1,112 1,155 596 596 1,197 493 493

PA 1,153 1,176 655 655 1,216 569 569

RI 8 8 4 4 8 4 4

VT 29 29 29 29 30 30 30

VA 1,025 1,047 537 537 1,083 451 451

4,343 4,511 2,519 2,519 4,676 2,167 2,167Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 139



## 9.0 PREPARATION OF SMOKE MODEL FILES

Air quality modelers in the Mid

- Atlantic and Northeastern state s use the SMOKE

Modeling System to create gridded, speciated, hourly emissions for input into a variety of

air quality models. This section describes how the SMOKE inventory files were

develop ed. It also describes how the SMOKE the temporal allocation, speciation, and

spatial allocation profiles, respectively, were developed. . SMOKE inventory files were

created for the following types of sources (which are described in Section 1.3):

9.1 NONEGU P OINT SOURCE S MOKE E MISSION FILES

Annual nonEGU point source inventories were prepared in SMOKE PT INV ORL format.

9.2 A REA SOURCE SMOKE E MISSION FILES

Annual area source inventories for 2017 and 2020 were prepared in SMOKE ARINV ORL

format. In developing the SMOKE ARINV ORL files for area sources, the USEPA

“transport factor” was applied to reduce fugitive dust emissions to account for the removal

of particles near their emission source by vegetation and surface features. The transport

factor was NOT applied to the NIF

- formatted annual emissions, but only to the SMOKE

ARINV ORL

- formatted file.

The standard transport fractions and SCC assignments from the USEPA CHIEF website

(USE PA 2007c) were used to reduce the PM10

- PRI and PM25

- PRI emissions in the area

so urce inventories. Two files were used. The first file contains a list of SCCs for which

the transport factor was applied. The major source categories included paved and unpaved

roads, construction activity, agricultural crop land tilling, and agricultur al livestock

operations. The second file contains the transport factor which varies by county. For

example, in Connecticut the transport fraction ranges from 0.21 in Tolland County to 0.44

in New Haven County.

Applying the transport factor to area sour ce fugitive dust emissions significantly reduces

that amount of particulate matter included in the air quality modeling. Region wide,

PM10

- PRI emissions are reduced by about 54 percent and PM25

- PRI emissions are

reduced by about 25 percent by applying the transport fraction. The percent reduction

varies by state due to the relative importance of the area source fugitive dust emissions

compared to non

- fugitive dust source emissions.

9.3 N ONROAD NMIM SMOKE E MISSION FILES

As discussed in Section 7 , the NMIM/NO NROAD model was executed using

specifications to generate monthly emission files. Monthly SMOKE ARINV ORL filesDocumentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 140



### were created. Average day emissions were calculated by dividing the NONROAD

generated monthly emissions by the number of d ays in each m onth

. S ummary reports

were prepared to verify agreement between the average day, monthly, and annual

emissions.

9.4 N ONROAD MAR SMOKE E MISSION FILES

Annual inventories for marine vessels, airport operations and railroad locomotives were

prepared in SMOKE ARINV ORL f ormat for each county in the region. Average day

emissions were calculated by dividing the annual emissions by 365 days. The ORL files

for Category 3 commercial marine vessels include only the emissions that occur in state

waters ( generally from the shor eline to 3

– 10 nautical miles from shore )

.Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 141



## 10.0 FINAL DELIVERABLES

Exhibit s 1 0 .1 to1 0

. 3 identif y the deliverable products for the 2017 and 2020 MANE

VU+VA emission inventor ies developed by MACTEC under this contract. The exhibit

also identifies deliverables associated with the 2017 and 2020 MANE

- VU+VA inventories

under development by other agencies.

Files are stored on MARAMA ftp site:

Address: ftp.marama.org

Login ID: regionalei

Password: marama2007

Files are stored in the following directories:

\ MARAMA 07

- 17

- 20 Version 3 \ Final 2017 2020 (Version 3_3)/NIF

\ MARAMA 07

- 17

- 20 Version 3 \ Final 2017 2020 (Version 3_ 3)/SMOKE

\ MARAMA 07

- 17

- 20 Version 3 \ Final 2017 2020 (Version 3_3)/TSD

\ MARAMA 07

- 17

- 20 Version 3 \ Final 2017 2020 (Version 3_3)/XLS

The contents of each folder are provided in Exhibits 1 0 .1, 1 0

. 2, and 1 0 .3

.Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 142



### Exhibit 1 0 .1

– NIF Data Files for the 2017/2020 MANE

- VU+VA Emission Inventor ies

File Description File Name Format Notes

2017 Annual Point Source Emission

Inventory in NOF format MANEVU+VA_V3_3 Point_2017_NOF.mdb NOF ACCESS File includes only those point

sources classified as “nonEGU”

according to the ERTAC definition.

See file for Field Definitions 2020 Annual Point Source Emission

Inventory in NOF format MANEVU+VA_V3_3 Point_20 20 _NOF.mdb NOF ACCESS

20 17 Annual Area Source Emission

Inventory in NOF format MANEVU+VA_V3_3 Area _20 17 _NOF.mdb NOF ACCESS See file for Field Definitions

20 20 Annual Area Source Emission

Inventory in NOF format MANEVU+VA_V3_3 Area_ 20 20 _NOF.mdb NOF ACCESS See file for Field Definitions

20 17 Annual NMIM/NONROAD

Emission Inventory in NOF format 2017MARAMANMIMv3.mdb NOF ACCESS See file for Field Definitions

20 20 Annual NMIM/NONROAD

Emission Inventory in NOF format 2020MARAMANMIMv3.mdb NOF ACCESS See file for Field Definitions

20 17 Annual MAR Emission

Inventory in NOF format MANEVU+VA_V3_3_MAR_2017_NOF.mdb NOF ACCESS See file for Field Definitions

20 20 Annual MAR Emission

Inventory in NOF format MANEVU+VA_V3_3_MAR_20 20 _NOF.mdb NOF ACCESS See file for Field DefinitionsDocumentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 143



### Exhibit 10.2

– Summary Spreadsheet Files for the 2017/2020 MANE

- VU+VA Emission Inventories

File Description File Name Format Notes

County/SCC level emissions

for all 2017/2020 scenarios V3_3 Area_07_17_20.xlsx MS EXCEL See file for Field

Definitions

Excel summary of emissions

by State and SCC for 2017 MANEVU+VA_V3_3_Area_2017_ExistingControls_StateSCCSummaries.xlsx MS EXCEL See file for Field

Definitions

Excel summary of emissions

by State and SCC for 2017 MANEVU+VA_V3_3_Area_2017_ What If Controls_StateSCCSummaries.xlsx MS EXCEL See file for Field

Definitions

Excel summary of emissions

by State and SCC for 2020 MANEVU+VA_V3_3_Area_20 20 _ExistingControls_StateSCCSummaries.xlsx MS EXCEL See file for Field

Definitions

Excel summary of emissions

by State and SCC for 2020 MANEVU+VA_V3_3_Area_20 20

_ What If Controls_StateSCCSummaries.xlsx MS EXCEL See file for Field

Definitions

Tables and graphs used in the

TSD TSD V3_3 2017_2020 Area Graphs.xlsx MS EXCEL See file for Field

Definitions

County/SCC level emissions

for all 2017/2020 scenarios V3_3 MAR _07_17_20.xlsx MS EXCEL See file for Field

Definitions

Excel summary of emissions

by State and SCC for 2017 MANEVU+VA_V3_3_ MAR _2017_StateSCCSummaries.xlsx MS EXCEL See file for Field

Definitions

Excel summary of emissions

by State and SCC for 2020 MANEVU +VA_V3_3_ MAR _20 20 _StateSCCSummaries.xlsx MS EXCEL See file for Field

Definitions

Tables and graphs used in the

TSD TSD V3_3 2017_2020 MAR Graphs.xlsx MS EXCEL See file for Field

Definitions

Process level emissions for all

2017/2020 scenarios V3_3 NonEGU _07_17_20.xlsx MS EXCEL See file for Field

Definitions

Excel summary of emissions

by State and SCC for 2017 MANEVU+VA_V3_3_ NonEGU _2017_ExistingControls_StateSCCSummaries.xlsx MS EXCEL See file for Field

Definitions

Excel summary of emissions

by State and SCC for 2017 MANEVU+VA_V3_3_ NonEGU _2017_ What If Controls_StateSCCSummaries.xlsx MS EXCEL See file for Field

Definitions

Excel summary of emissions

by State and SCC for 2020 MANEVU+VA_V3_3_ NonEGU _20 20 _ExistingControls_StateSCCSummaries.xlsx MS EXCEL See fi le for Field

DefinitionsDocumentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 144

Excel summary of emissions

by State and SCC for 2020 MANEVU+VA_V3_3_ NonEGU _20 20

_ What If Controls_StateSCCSummaries.xlsx MS EXCEL See file for Field

Definitions

Tables and graphs used in the

TSD TSD V3_3 2017_2020 NonEGU Graphs.xlsx MS EXCEL See file for Field

Definitions

Excel summary of emissions

by State and SCC for 2017 MANEVU+VA_V3_3_ NMIM _2017_StateSCCSummaries.xlsx MS EXCEL See file for Field

Definitions

Excel summary of emissions

by State and SCC for 2020 MANEVU+VA_V3_3_ NMIM _20 20 _StateSCCSummaries.xlsx MS EXCEL See file for Field

Definitions

Tables and graphs used in the

TSD TSD V3_3 2017_2020 NMIM Graphs.xlsx MS EXCEL See file for Field

DefinitionsDocumentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 145



### Exhibit 1 0 .2

– SMOKE Files for the 20 13/2017/2020 MANE

- VU+VA Emission Inventor ies

File Description File Name Format Notes

20 17 Annual Point Source Emission

Inventory in SMOKE ORL format PTINV_201 7 _Non Hourly

_ ExistingControls_Jan2012 .orl SMOKE

PTINV

ORL Files includes only those point

sources classified as “nonEGU”

according to the ERTAC definition.

See file for Field Definitions 20 1 7 Annual Point Source Emission

Inventory in SMOKE ORL format PTINV_201 7 _Non Hourly

_ WhatIfControls_Jan2012 .orl SMOKE

PTINV

ORL

20 20 Annual Point Source Emission

Inventory in SMOKE ORL format PTINV_20 20 _Non Hourly_ ExistingControls_Jan2012 .orl SMOKE

PTINV

ORL

20 20 Annual Point Source Emission

Inventory in SMOKE ORL format PTINV_20 20 _Non Hourly

_ WhatIfControls_Jan2012 .orl SMOKE

PTINV

OR L

20 17 Annual Area Source Emission

Inventory in SMOKE ORL format AR INV_201 7

_ Area

_ ExistingControls_Jan2012 .orl SMOKE

ARINV

ORL Nonpoint Th ese file s ha ve the PM transport

factor s by county applied to the NOF

emissions. See section 10.2 for

discussion.

See http://www.smoke

model.org/version2.6/html/ for file

format 20 17 Annual Area Source Emission

Inventory in SMOKE ORL format AR INV_201 7

_ Area

_ WhatIfControls_Jan2012 .orl SMOKE

ARINV

ORL Nonpoint

20 20 Annual Area Source Emission

Inventory in SMOKE ORL format ARI NV_20 20

_ Area

_ ExistingControls_Jan2012 .orl SMOKE

ARINV

ORL nonpoint

20 20 Annual Area Source Emission

Inventory in SMOKE ORL format AR INV_20 20

_ Area

_ WhatIfControls_Jan2012 .orl SMOKE

ARINV

ORL nonpoint

20 13 Annual MAR Source

Emission Inventory in SMOKE

ORL format ARINV_2017_ MAR_ Jan2012 .txt SMOKE

ARINV

ORL Nonpoint See http://www.smoke

model.org/version2.6/html/ for file

format

20 17 Annual MAR Source

Emission Inventory in SMOKE

ORL format ARINV_2020_MAR_Jan2012 .txt SMOKE

ARINV

ORL Nonpoint See http://www.smoke

model.org/version2.6/html/ for file

formatDocumentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 146



## 11.0 REFERENCES

CENSUS 2000. U.S. Census Bureau. 1997 Economic Census: Bridge Between NAICS

and SIC . June 2000. http://www.census.gov/epcd/ec97brdg

EEA2005. Energy and Environmental Analysis, Inc. (Prepared for Oak Ridge National

Laboratory). Characterization of the U.S. Industrial/Commercial Boiler Population , May

2005. http:/

/www.cibo.org/pubs/industrialboilerpopulationanalysis.pdf

EIA 2006 . U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration. Annual

Energy Outlook with Projections to 2030 (AEO2006). DOE/EIA

- 0383(2006). February

2006. http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/archive/aeo06/pdf/0383(2006).pdf

EIA 2010 . U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration. Annual

Energy Outlook with Projections to 2035 (AEO2010) ; DOE/EIA

- 0383(2010). April 2010.

http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/aeo/assumption/pdf/0554(2010).pdf

EIA 2011 . U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administratio n. Annual

Energy Outlook with Projections to 2035 (AEO2011) ; DOE/EIA

- 0383(2011). April 2011.

http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/pdf/0383(2011).pdf

FAA 2010. Federal Aviation Administrati on. Terminal Area Forecast 2009

- 2030

. Database file (APO100_TAF_Final_2010.zip) downloaded July 2010.

http://aspm.faa.gov/main/taf.asp

MANE

- VU 2007. Mid

- Atlantic / Northeast Visibility. Statement of th e Mid

Atlantic/Northeast Visibility Union Concerning a Course of Action within MANE

- VU

Toward Assuring Reasonable Progress . June 20, 2007.

http://www.otcair.org/manevu/document.asp?fview=Formal%20Actions

MARAMA 2007. Prepared by MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc. for the Mid

- Atlantic

Regional Air Management Association. Development of Emissions Projections for 2009,

2012, and 2018 for NonEGU Po int, Area, and Nonroad Sources in the MANE

- VU Region.

February 2007. http://www.marama.org/technical

- center/ emissions

- inventory/2002

-

inventory

- and

- projections/mane

- vu

- future

- year

- emissions

- inventory

MARAMA 2011a. Prepared by MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. for the Mid

Atlantic Regional Air Management Association. Technical Support Document for the

Dev elopment of the 2007 Emission Inventory for Regional Air Quality Modeling in the

Northeast / Mid

-

Atlantic Region . February 27, 2011.Documentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 147



### MARAMA 2011b. Prepared by MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. for the Mid

Atlantic Regional Air Management Associatio n. Technical Support Document for the

Development of the 20 13 / 2017/ 2020 Emission Inventor ies for Regional Air Quality

Modeling in the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region . February 27, 2011.

MARAMA 201 2

. Prepared by AMEC Environment and Infrastructure and SRA

International for the Mid

- Atlantic Regional Air Management Association. Technical

Support Document for the Development of the 2007 Emission Inventory for Regional Air

Quality Modeling in the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region Version 3_3

. January 23, 2 012

.

OTC 2001. Prepared by E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc. for the Ozone Transport

Commission. Control Measure Development Support Analysis of Ozone Transport

Commission Model Rules . March 31, 2001.

http://www.otcair.org/Document.asp?fview=Report#

OTC 2007. Prepared by MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc. for the Ozone Transport

Commission. Identification and Evaluation of Candidate Control Mea sures

– Final

Technical Support Document. February 28, 2007.

http://www.otcair.org/Document.asp?fview=Report#

OTC 2009. Ozone Transport Commission. Status Report on OTC States’ Efforts to

Promulgate Regulations Based on OTC 2001 Model Rules . October 19, 2009.

http://www.otcair.org/interest.asp?Fview=stationary

OTC 20 11a

. Ozone Transport Commission. Status Report on OT C States’ Efforts to

Promulgate Regulations Based on OTC 2006 Model Rules

. May 9, 2011

. http://www.otcair.org/interest.asp?Fview=stationary

OTC 20 11b

. Ozone Transport Commission. Sta tus Report on OTC States’ Efforts to

Promulgate Regulations Based on OTC 2009/2010 Model Rules

. May 9, 2011

. http://www.otcair.org/interest.asp?Fview=stationary

OTC 2011c. Ozone Transport Commission. Technical Support Document, NOx Section,

Draft for Public Comment . March 16, 2011.

OTC 2011d. Ozone Transport Commission. Technical Support Document, VOC Section,

Draft for Public Comment . March 16, 2011. (with editss provi ded by Judy Rand, NJDEP).

USEPA 1999. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Emission Inventory Improvement

Program, Volume 10, Emission Projections. . December 1999.

http://ww w.epa.gov/ttn/chief/eiip/techreport/volume10/x01.pdfDocumentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 14 8



### USEPA 2004a. E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc. for the U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency Crosswalk Between Source Classification Code (SCC)and Emission Activity

Growth Factors

– Final Technical Memoran dum. September 9, 2004.

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/ecas/SCCcrosswalk.pdf

USEPA 2004b. E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc. for the U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency Crosswalk Between Standard Indust rial Classification (SIC) Codes and Emission

Activity Growth Factors

– Final Technical Memorandum. September 9, 2004.

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/ecas/SICcrosswalk.pdf

USEPA 200 4c

. U.S. Environmen tal Protection Agency. NonroadEngine Grwoth

Estimates . EPA

- 420/P

- 04

- 08

. April 2004

. http://www.epa.gov/otaq/models/nonrdmdl/nonrdmdl2004/420p04008.pdf

USEPA 2005a. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Emissions Inventory Guidance

for Implementation of Ozone and Particulate Matter National Ambient Air Quality

Standards (NAAQS) and Regional Haze Regulations . EPA

- 454/R

- 05

- 001. August 2005.

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/eidocs/eiguid/eiguidfinal_nov2005.pdf

USEPA 2005b. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Control of Air Pollution From

Aircraft and Aircraft Engines; Emission Standar ds and Test Procedures: Final Rule.

November 17, 2005. http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA

- AIR/2005/November/Day

17/a22704.pdf

USEPA 2007a. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Guidance on the Use of Models

and Other Analyses for Demonstrating Attainment of Air Quality Goals for Ozone, PM2.5,

and Regional Haze. April 2007.

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/scram/guidance/guide/final

- 03

- pm

- rh

- guidance.pdf

USEPA 2007b. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Guidance for Estimating VOC

and NOx Emission Changes from MACT Rules . EPA

- 457/B

- 07

- 001. May 2007.

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/naaqs/ozone/o3imp8hr/documents/guidance/200705_epa457_b

- 07

-

001_emission_changes_mact_rules.pdf

USEPA 2007 c

. U.S. Environmental Protections Agency. Emissions Modeling

Clearinghouse

- Fugitive Dust Fractions . February 2007.

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/emch/dustfractions )

USEPA 2008a. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Technical Support Document:

Preparation of Emissions Inventories For the 2002

- based Platform, Version 3, Criteria AirDocumentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 149



### Pollutants. January 2008.

http://www.epa.gov/scram001/reports/Emissions%20TSD%20Vol1_02

- 28

- 08.pdf

USEPA 2008b. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Control Techniques Guidelines

. http://www.epa.gov/ttnca aa1/t1ctg.html

USEPA 2008c. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Regulatory Impact Analysis:

Control or Emissions of Air Pollution from Locomotive Engines and Marine Compression

Engines Less than 30 Liters Per Cylinder. EPA420

- R

- 08

- 001a. May 2008.

http://www.epa.gov/otaq/regs/nonroad/420r08001a.pdf

USEPA 2009a. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Clean Air Markets

– Data and

Maps Web Site; Unit Level Emissions Query for 2007. File downloaded on September 9,

2009. http://camddataandmaps.epa.gov/gdm/index.cfm?fuseaction=emissions.wizard

USEPA 2009b. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Sugge sted Nationwide Average

Fuel Properties . EPA

- 420

- B

- 09

- 018. April 2009

http://www.epa.gov/oms/models/nonrdmdl/nonrdmdl2008/420b09018.pdf

USEPA 2009c. U.S. Environmental Pro tection Agency. Regulatory Impact Analysis:

Control of Emissions of Air Pollution from Category 3 Marine Diesel Engines. EPA420

- R

09

- 019. December 2009. http://www.epa.gov/otaq /regs/nonroad/marine/ci/420r09019.pdf

USEPA 2009d. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Proposal to Designate an

Emissions Control Area for Nitrogen Oxides, Sulfur Oxides, and Particulate Matter. EPA

420

- R

- 09

- 007. April 2009. http://www.epa.gov/otaq/regs/nonroad/marine/ci/420r09007

-

chap2.pdf

USEPA 2010a. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Technical Support Document

(TSD) for the Transport Rule: Emission Inventor ies. Docket ID No. EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 2009

-

0491 . June 2010.

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/emch/transport/tr_proposal_emissions_tsd.pdf

USEPA 2010b. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2020 Emissions Data from

EPA’s 2005

- based V4 Modeling Platform; Projection and Control Factors . Provided by

Rich Mason on April 15, 2010.

ftp://ftp.epa.gov/EmisInventory/2005v4/projection_control_packets

USEPA 2010c. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Transport Rule Emission

Inventories Notice of Data Availability (NODA). Docket ID No. EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 2009

-

0491 . October 27, 2010. T R_EI_NODA_relevant_CoSTpackets_and_inventories.xls

ftp://ftp.epa.gov/EmisInventory/2005v4/tr_ei_nodaDocumentation for the 2017/2020 Emission Inventories for the Northeast / Mid

- Atlantic Region January 23, 2012

Page 150



### USEPA 2010d. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Advance Notice of Proposed

Rulemaki ng on Lead Emissions from Piston

- Engine Aircraft Using Leaded Aviation

Gasoline . April 2010. http://www.epa.gov/oms/regs/nonroad/aviation/420f10013.pdf

USEPA 2010 e

. U.S. Environ mental Protection Agency. Nonroad Regulations 9

- 9

- 10

. September 9, 2010

. Provided by Penny Carey, USEPA Office of Transporation and Air

Quality.

USEPA 201 1

. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Emission Standards Reference

Guide. http://www.epa.gov/oms/regs/nonroad/aviation/420f10013.pdf