alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****    - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский 

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

        - Student Loans
        - Grants
        - Laws
        - Data

            - taxonomy view
            - Vermont 

# Vermont 

# Vermont 

                      -  December 29, 2021  U.S. Department of Education Approves Vermont's Plan for Use of American Rescue Plan Funds to Support K-12 Schools and Students, Distributes Remaining $95 Million To State  
Today, the U.S. Department of Education (Department) announced the  approval of Vermont's American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary  School Emergency Relief (ARP ESSER) plan and distributed remaining ARP ESSER  funds to the state.
  **Tags:**VermontAmerican Rescue PlanPress Releases

## How Do I Find...?

                      - Student loans, forgiveness
                      - Higher Education Rulemaking
                      - College accreditation
                      - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
                      - FERPA
                      - FAFSA
                      - 1098, tax forms
                      - More...

## Information About...

                      - Elevating Teaching
                      - Early Learning
                      - Engage Every Student
                      - Unlocking Career Success
                      - Cybersecurity

----

*Our mission* is to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness by fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access.

          - Student Loans
          - Repaying Loans
          - Defaulted Loans
          - Loan Forgiveness
          - Loan Servicers
          - Grants & Programs
          - Apply for Pell Grants
          - Grants Forecast
          - Apply for a Grant

          - Laws & Guidance
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - Civil Rights
          - IDEA Website
          - Data & Research
          - Education Statistics
          - Postsecondary Education Data
          - ED Data Express
          - Nation's Report Card
          - What Works Clearinghouse
          - Open Data Platform
          - COVID Relief Data

          - About Us
          - Contact Us
          - ED Offices
          - Jobs
          - Press Releases
          - FAQs
          - Recursos en español
          - Budget, Performance
          - Privacy Program
          - Homeroom Blog

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information Quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
**Exhibit 12.01**

 

**PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF COLORADO AND SUBSIDIARIES**

**STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF**

**RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES**

*(amounts in thousands of dollars)*

 
| ** **                                           | ** ** | **Year ended Dec. 31,** | ** ** |
|------------------------------------------------------|------------|----------------------------------------|------------|
| ** **                                           | ** ** | **2008**                               | ** ** | **2007** | ** ** | **2006** | ** ** | **2005** | ** ** | **2004** | ** ** |
| Earnings as defined:                                 |       |                                   |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Pretax income from continuing operations             |       | $                                      | 506,424    |   | $ | 431,251 |   | $ | 323,159 |   | $ | 281,657 |   | $ | 290,861 |   |
| Add: Fixed charges                                   |       | 199,739                                |       | 311,377 |   | 264,672 |   | 263,516 |   | 266,231 |   |
| Earnings as defined                                  |       | $                                      | 706,163    |   | $ | 742,628 |   | $ | 587,831 |   | $ | 545,173 |   | $ | 557,092 |   |
| Fixed charges:                                       |       |                                   |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Interest charges                                     |       | $                                      | 154,313    |   | $ | 180,230 |   | $ | 137,493 |   | $ | 144,835 |   | $ | 157,447 |   |
| Interest charges on life insurance policy borrowings |       | 248                                    |       | 105,396 |   | 117,536 |   | 107,610 |   | 98,094 |   |
| Interest component of leases                         |       | 45,178                                 |       | 25,751 |   | 9,643 |   | 11,071 |   | 10,690 |   |
| Total fixed charges                                  |       | $                                      | 199,739    |   | $ | 311,377 |   | $ | 264,672 |   | $ | 263,516 |   | $ | 266,231 |   |
| Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                   |       | 3.5                                    |       | 2.4 |   | 2.2 |   | 2.1 |   | 2.1 |   |

 

----
No. 12-5283.

#### O’Guinn *v.*Cortez Masto, Attorney General of Nevada, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11A1155.

#### Cox *v.*Gilson, Warden.

Application for certificate of appealability, addressed to Justice Sotomayor and referred to the Court, denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6662

LINDA ANN TYLER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

GLORIA JEAN RACKLEY; EARL RICHARD BAZZLE,

Warden at Leath Correctional Institution;

CHARLES KEARNEY, JR., Captain; DIANE HAMRICK,

Lieutenant; MELISSA WHITT; BERNICE WIGGLETON,

Major; BARBARA L. PARTILEDGE, Officer; R.

IRBY, Mental Health Counselor; DIANE LITWER,

Grievance Coordinator; RANCE COBB, Principal;

BETTY FLEMING, Sergeant; V. C. HILL, Lieutenant; SANDRA SHUMATE, Operations at Leath Correctional Institution; T. J. PHILSON, Captain;

SHERRI CHANDLER, Administrative Assistant,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Florence. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge.

(CA-99-2845-4-24-BF)

Submitted: September 6, 2001 Decided: September 13, 2001

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Linda Ann Tyler, Appellant Pro Se. McDonald Patrick Tinsley,

Steven Michael Pruit, MCDONALD, PATRICK, TINSLEY, BAGGETT & POSTON,

Greenwood, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Linda Ann Tyler appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting

the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

Tyler v. Rackley, No. CA-99-2845-4-24-BF (D.S.C. Mar. 30, 2001).

We grant Tyler’s motion to file a response to Appellees’ brief and

deny each of her remaining outstanding motions. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2023286EN.01002601.xml

| 14.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 286/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 286/26

---

Judgment of the General Court of 28 June 2023 — UGA Nutraceuticals v EUIPO — BASF (OMEGOR)

(Case T-495/22) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Word mark OMEGOR - Earlier EU figurative mark OMACOR - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

(2023/C 286/35)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: UGA Nutraceuticals Srl (Gubbio, Italy) (represented by: M. Riva, J. Graffer and A. Ottolini, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Chylińska and T. Frydendahl, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: BASF AS (Oslo, Norway)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 10 June 2022 (Case R 1168/2021-4).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders UGA Nutraceuticals Srl and the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders UGA Nutraceuticals Srl and the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 380, 3.10.2022.

---
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1119 

Expressing support for the recognition of Constitution Week. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 17, 2020 

Mr. GOSAR (for himself, Mr. GIBBS, Mr. YOHO, Mr. KELLY of Pennsylvania, 

Mr. FULCHER, Mrs. LESKO, Mr. BANKS, Mr. GOHMERT, Mr. ROY, Mr. 

GRIFFITH, Mr. COLLINS of Georgia, Mr. BROOKS of Alabama, Mr. 

PERRY, Mr. DESJARLAIS, Mr. BIGGS, Mr. BISHOP of North Carolina, 

Mr. GAETZ, Mr. SCHWEIKERT, Mr. MASSIE, Mr. LAMBORN, Mr. NORMAN, Mr. HICE of Georgia, Mr. RICE of South Carolina, Mr. WALTZ, Mr. 

KING of Iowa, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. MCCLINTOCK, Mr. STEUBE, Mr. TIPTON, Mr. GROTHMAN, Mr. CLINE, Mr. MAST, Mr. GRAVES of Louisiana, 

Mr. BUCK, Mr. RIGGLEMAN, Mr. THOMPSON of Pennsylvania, Mr. BUDD, 

Mr. WEBER of Texas, and Mr. MARSHALL) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the recognition of Constitution Week. 

Whereas September 17, 2020, marks the 233d anniversary of 

the ratification of the Constitution of the United States 

of America by the Constitutional Convention; 

Whereas the Founders of the Nation signed the historic document with the consent of the people and the legislatures 

of the States; 

Whereas the Constitution is the source of all government 

powers while at the same time defines limitations on the 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1119 IH 

government in order to protect the liberties and freedoms 

of citizens; 

Whereas this historic document has ensured that liberty, freedom, and unalienable rights remain supreme in the 

United States; 

Whereas the Daughters of the American Revolution petitioned Congress to set aside September 17 through 23 

annually to be dedicated for the observance of Constitution Week; and 

Whereas a resolution was adopted by the House of Representatives and signed into public law in 1956 by President Dwight D. Eisenhower for the observance of Constitution Week: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) expresses support for the recognition of 

3 Constitution Week, as a time to commemorate 

4 America’s most important document and to study 

5 the events leading up to the framing of the Constitu6 tion and the responsibility of citizens to protect and 

7 defend the principles enshrined in this document; 

8 and 

9 (2) encourages schools and universities to in10 clude, in a grade appropriate manner, lessons ex11 plaining the history and importance of the Constitu12 tion. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
NOTE : This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ QUITO I. NEHEMIAH, Petitioner

v.

DIRECTOR OF THE OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent

______________________
2024

- 1575

______________________ Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. DE

- 0731

- 23

- 0243

- I

- 1

.

______________________ O R D E R

The petitioner having failed to pay the docketing fee required by Federal Circuit Rule 52 (a) (1) and to file the required Statement Concerning Discrimination, it is Case: 24-1575 Document: 9 Page: 1 Filed: 05/07/2024N EHEMIAH V

. OPM 2

ORDERED that the petition for review be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.

FOR THE COURT

May 7, 2024 Date

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: May 7, 2024 Case: 24-1575 Document: 9 Page: 2 Filed: 05/07/2024
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

ALL AMERICAN SEMICONDUCTOR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES                                                     EXHIBIT 11.1

STATEMENT RE:  COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS (UNAUDITED)

                                                               QUARTERS                           NINE MONTHS
PERIODS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30                               1997              1996              1997             1996
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                           <C>               <C>               <C>              <C>            
PRIMARY EARNINGS (LOSS)
  PER SHARE:

NET INCOME (LOSS)..........................   $     1,127,000   $    (7,350,000)  $     2,051,000  $    (7,712,000)
                                              ===============   ===============   ===============  ===============

WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES:
  Common shares outstanding................        19,673,600        19,748,600        19,670,889       19,746,118
  Common share equivalents.................           187,337           310,394            57,249          557,002
                                              ---------------   ---------------   ---------------  ---------------
  Weighted average number of
    common shares and common
    share equivalents outstanding..........        19,860,937        20,058,994        19,728,138       20,303,120
                                              ===============   ===============   ===============  ===============

PRIMARY EARNINGS (LOSS) PER
  COMMON SHARE.............................            $  .06            $ (.37)           $  .10           $ (.38)
                                                       ======            ======            ======           ======

FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS)
  PER SHARE:

NET INCOME (LOSS)..........................   $     1,127,000   $    (7,350,000)  $     2,051,000  $    (7,712,000)
                                              ===============   ===============   ===============  ===============
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES:
  Weighted average number of
    common shares and common
    share equivalents outstanding..........        19,860,937        20,058,994        19,728,138       20,303,120
  Additional options not included above....           264,560                 -           394,649                -
                                              ---------------   ---------------   ---------------  ---------------
  Weighted average number of
    common shares outstanding
    as adjusted............................        20,125,497        20,058,994        20,122,787       20,303,120
                                              ===============   ===============   ===============  ===============

FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS)
  PER COMMON SHARE.........................            $  .06            $ (.37)           $  .10           $ (.38)
                                                       ======            ======            ======           ======
</TABLE>
# C_2023104EN.01003402.xml

| 20.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 104/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 104/34

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 2 February 2023 — Nicoventures Trading and Others v Commission

(Case T-706/22 R)

(Interim relief - Public health - Withdrawal of certain exemptions for heated tobacco products - Application for interim measures - No urgency)

(2023/C 104/53)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Nicoventures Trading Ltd (London, United Kingdom) and the other five applicants whose names are listed in the annex to the order (represented by: L. Van den Hende, M. Schonberg, J. Penz-Evren and P. Wytinck, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: H. van Vliet, A. Becker and F. van Schaik, acting as Agents)

Re:

By their application on the basis of Articles 278 and 279 TFEU, the applicants seek, first, in essence, the suspension of operation of Commission Delegated Directive (EU) 2022/2100 of 29 June 2022 amending Directive 2014/40/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the withdrawal of certain exemptions in respect of heated tobacco products (OJ 2022 L 283, p. 4) and, second, the grant of any other interim measures as appropriate.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
**Exhibit 31.2**
**Certification Required by Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rule 13a-14(a) (ChiefFinancial Officer)**
I, Richard W. Neu, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Charter One Financial,Inc. (the “Registrant”);
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theRegistrant’s auditors and the Audit Committee of the Registrant’s Board ofDirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.   Date: August 10, 2004 /s/ Richard W. Neu   Richard W. Neu Executive Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer
29
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 53 (Wednesday, March 19, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13159-13160]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6939]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institute of Dental Research; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
National Institute of Dental Research Special Emphasis Panel (SEP) 
meeting:

    Name of SEP: National Institute of Dental Research Special 
Emphasis Panel-Contract Review-Amalgum (97-C).
    Dates: March 17, 1997.
    Time: 3:00 p.m.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 4500 Center Drive, Natcher 
Building, Room 4AN-44F, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Teleconference).
    Contact person: Dr. George Hausch, Chief, Office of Review, 4500 
Center Drive, Natcher Building, Room 4AN-44F, Bethesda, MD 20892, 
(301) 594-2372.
    Purpose/Agenda: To evaluate and review contract proposals. This 
notice is being published less than fifteen days prior to the 
meeting due to the urgent need to meet timing limitations imposed by 
the review and funding cycle.
    The meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.121, Oral 
Diseases and Disorders Research)


[[Page 13160]]


    Dated: March 14, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-6939 Filed 3-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
# ff8 77 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY WATER HEATER ENERGY EFFICIENCY STANDARDS Forrestal Building Room 1E-245 July 23, 1999 9:00 am. PRELIMINARY AGENDA ExpectedOutcomes: Receive comments on theanalysis,recommendationsonstandard levels andfactorsto considerin settingstandards.

9:00 am - 9:05 am Welcome (DanReicher) 9:05 am - 9:20 am Introductions and Agenda Review (Doug-Brookman) * Housekeeping * Introduction * Agenda Review 9:20 am - 9:30 am Assistant Secretary's Remarks (DanReicher) 9:30 am - 10:15 am Summary ofDOE Results (TerryLogee) * Price-efficiency, LCC, Energy Savings, NPV & Emissions * Manufacturing Impacts 10:15 am - 10:30 am Break 10:30 am - 2:00 pm Summary of Comments (MichaelMcCabe) (aftereach topictherewill be anopportunityforstakeholder discussion) * Engineering, e.g., venting, heat traps, hot water usage, insulation

· Small Water Heater Closets * Price & Markup, e.g., gas equipment markups, installation costs * Marginal Energy Rates * Life-cycle Cost, e.g., RECS Data,blended fuel projections * National Energy Savings, e.g., fuel-switching * Measured EF vs Rated EF * Standards Recommendation 12:00 pm - 1:00 pm Lunch on Your Own2:00 pm - 4:00 pm Discussion Questions (DanReicher) 

### Including: * What standard levels do you believe the analysis justifies? * We have a recommendation from GAMA that appears to be the beginning ofa consensus process. What should DOE do to continue this dialogue? * What can DOE do to help the industry meet the new standards in the time between the final rule and the effective date ofthe 

### rulemaking, e.g.NFGC, CPSC initiatives? When DOE completes this rulemaking, what steps could the Department take to support and increase the market demand for water heaters which will exceed the new minimum standards, e.g. Energy Starprogram, FEMP executive order? 4:00 pm Adjourn