alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2022424EN.01005001.xml

| 7.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 424/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 424/50

---

Action brought on 22 September 2022 — Cristescu v Commission

(Case T-590/22)

(2022/C 424/63)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Adrian Sorin Cristescu (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: S. Orlandi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

| — | annul the decision of 17 November 2021 which imposed on the applicant the penalty of deferment of advancement to a higher step for a period of six months; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of 17 November 2021 which imposed on the applicant the penalty of deferment of advancement to a higher step for a period of six months;

| — | order the European Commission to pay the costs and to pay one euro to the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Commission to pay the costs and to pay one euro to the applicant.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging manifest errors of assessment which render the contested decision unlawful. He relies, in that regard, on the fact that the alleged misconduct on which the contested decision is based has not been established and that that is apparent, inter alia, from the unanimous opinion given by the Disciplinary Board. |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging manifest errors of assessment which render the contested decision unlawful. He relies, in that regard, on the fact that the alleged misconduct on which the contested decision is based has not been established and that that is apparent, inter alia, from the unanimous opinion given by the Disciplinary Board.

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging infringement of the rights of the defence. The applicant relies, in particular, on the right to be heard, in so far as the members of the Investigation and Disciplinary Office (IDOC), to whom the powers of the appointing authority (‘the Appointing Authority’) were delegated during the procedure and who drafted the inquiry report, the conclusions of which were questioned by the Disciplinary Board, then played a decisive role in the adoption of the decision taken, in a non-transparent way, by the Appointing Authority. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging infringement of the rights of the defence. The applicant relies, in particular, on the right to be heard, in so far as the members of the Investigation and Disciplinary Office (IDOC), to whom the powers of the appointing authority (‘the Appointing Authority’) were delegated during the procedure and who drafted the inquiry report, the conclusions of which were questioned by the Disciplinary Board, then played a decisive role in the adoption of the decision taken, in a non-transparent way, by the Appointing Authority.

| 3. | Third plea in law, alleging infringement of the principle of proportionality. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Third plea in law, alleging infringement of the principle of proportionality.

---
<PAGE>   1



                                                                     EXHIBIT 23



              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

         We consent to the incorporation by reference of our reports, dated
January 27, 1998, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements and
financial statement schedule of Quaker State Corporation and Subsidiaries as of
December 31, 1997 and 1996, and for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 1997, which reports are incorporated by reference or included in
this annual report on Form 10-K, in the following documents:

1.   Registration Statements No. 33-20416 and 333-06291 on Form S-8 for the
     Quaker State Corporation Thrift and Stock Purchase Plan, filed under the
     Securities Act of 1993, as amended, and the Prospectus used in connection
     with such Registrant Statement;

2.   Registration Statement No. 33-7163 on Form S-8 for the 1986 Stock Option
     Plan of Quaker State Corporation, filed under the Securities Act of 1933,
     as amended, and the Prospectus used in connection with such Registration
     Statements;

3.   Registration Statement No. 33-65862 on Form S-8 for the Baum Employment
     Agreement, filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended;

4.   Registration Statement No. 33-53605 on Form S-8 for the 1994 Non-Employee
     Directors' Stock Option Plan, filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as
     amended, and the Prospectus used in connection with such Registration
     Statement;

5.   Registration Statements No. 33-53617, 333-16237 and 333-33099 on Form S-8
     for the 1994 Stock Incentive Plan, filed under the Securities Act of 1933,
     as amended, and the Prospectus used in connection with such Registration
     Statement;

6.   Registration Statement No. 333-05929 on Form S-8 for the 1996 Directors'
     Fee Plan, filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the
     Prospectus used in connection with such Registration Statement; and

7.   Registration Statement No. 333-33133 on Form S-3 for the registration of
     Debt Securities, Capital Stock and /or Warrants, filed under the Securities
     Act of 1933, and the Prospectus used in connection with such Registration
     Statement.

We also Consent to the references to our firm under the caption "Experts" in the
Prospectuses used in connection with Registration Statements No. 33-20416,
333-06291, 33-7163, 33-65862, 33-53605, 33-53617, 333-16237. 333-33099,
333-05929, and 333-33133 solely as it relates to the current financial
statements being incorporated by reference.





Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.

Dallas, Texas
March 26, 1998
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0603

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

TRENT MATTHEW LARSON,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including February 28, 2022, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 18 2022

01/18/2022

Case Number: DA 20-0603
# C_2022311EN.01002201.xml

| 16.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 311/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 311/22

---

Action brought on 4 July 2022 — BPCE and Others v SRB

(Case T-393/22)

(2022/C 311/25)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: BPCE (Paris, France) and the 45 other applicants (represented by: A. Gosset-Grainville, M. Trabucchi and M. Dalon, lawyers)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board (SRB)

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:

| — | pursuant to Article 263 TFEU, annul Decision SRB/ES/2022/18 of 11 April 2022 on the calculation of 2022 ex-ante contributions to the SRF in so far as it concerns the applicants; |
| --- | --- |

—

pursuant to Article 263 TFEU, annul Decision SRB/ES/2022/18 of 11 April 2022 on the calculation of 2022 ex-ante contributions to the SRF in so far as it concerns the applicants;

| — | pursuant to Article 277 TFEU, declare the following provisions of the SRM Regulation, (1) the Implementing Regulation (2) and the Delegated Regulation (3) inapplicable:






  — | Articles 69(1), 69(2), 70(1) and 70(2)(a) and (b) of the SRM Regulation; |
| --- | --- | --- |

—

pursuant to Article 277 TFEU, declare the following provisions of the SRM Regulation, (1) the Implementing Regulation (2) and the Delegated Regulation (3) inapplicable:

—

Articles 69(1), 69(2), 70(1) and 70(2)(a) and (b) of the SRM Regulation;

| — | Articles 4(2), 5,6, 7 and 20 of the Delegated Regulation, and Annex I thereto; |
| --- | --- |

—

Articles 4(2), 5,6, 7 and 20 of the Delegated Regulation, and Annex I thereto;

| — | Article 4 of the Implementing Regulation; |
| --- | --- |

—

Article 4 of the Implementing Regulation;

| — | order the defendant to pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay all the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants rely on eight pleas in law which are, in essence, identical or similar to those raised in Case T-391/22, Société générale and Others v SRB.

---

(1)  Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2014 establishing uniform rules and a uniform procedure for the resolution of credit institutions and certain investment firms in the framework of a Single Resolution Mechanism and a Single Resolution Fund and amending Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 (OJ 2014 L 255, p. 1).

(2)  Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/81 of 19 December 2014 specifying uniform conditions of application of Regulation No 806/2014 with regard to ex ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (OJ 2015 L 15, p. 1).

(3)  Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/63 of 21 October 2014 supplementing Directive 2014/59 with regard to ex ante contributions to resolution financing arrangements (OJ 2015 L 11, p. 44).

---
No. 11-11073.

#### Gutierrez *v.*California.

Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
# C_2022441EN.01002402.xml

| 21.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 441/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 441/24

---

Action brought on 26 September 2022 — Agus v EUIPO — Alpen Food Group (ROYAL MILK)

(Case T-603/22)

(2022/C 441/33)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Agus sp. z o.o. (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: B. Wojtkowska, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Alpen Food Group BV (Weesp, Netherlands)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark ROYAL MILK — European Union trade mark No 10 321 735

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 July 2022 in Case R 2056/2021-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) and 58(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) and 58(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Provident Bankshares Corporation (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Gary N. Geisel, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Gary N. GeiselGary N. GeiselChief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board


May 11, 2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements of operations found on
pages 3, 4 and 5 of the Company's Form 10-QSB for the year to date, and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         116,944
<SECURITIES>                                   613,898      
<RECEIVABLES>                                   43,743
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               777,760
<PP&E>                                          72,882
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,171,977
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           29,451
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                     3,546,210
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     313,684 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,171,977
<SALES>                                        133,785
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                84,469
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               215,294
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (50,186)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (50,186)   
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0

</TABLE>
- 1 -

Alexander Van der Bellen

Managing Director and

Associate General Counsel

Delta Air Lines, Inc.

1212 New York Avenue NW

Washington, DC 20005

202.842.4184

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

October 9, 2012

via email and regulations.gov

Esta Rosenberg

Chief, U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Division

Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Application of Delta Air Lines, Inc.

For an Allocation of 7 U.S.-China Frequencies

Docket DOT-OST-2012-0167

Dear Ms. Rosenberg:

This letter is to confirm that Delta has polled all carriers on the service list to the above 

referenced application and there are no objections. In these circumstances, we urge that the 

application be granted as soon as possible.

Respectfully submitted,

Alexander Van der Bellen
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1015 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1015

   Resolution recognizing all speedways as essential businesses and 
   calling on local authorities and governors to work with racetrack 
     owners and stakeholders to commence outdoor races immediately.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 22, 2020

 Mr. Walker submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                  the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Resolution recognizing all speedways as essential businesses and 
   calling on local authorities and governors to work with racetrack 
     owners and stakeholders to commence outdoor races immediately.

Whereas there are over 1,200 racetracks in the country;
Whereas the racing industry contributes a significant number of jobs across 
        several sectors including automobile manufacturing and food services, a 
        vital source of economic growth, at a time when the unemployment rate 
        was most recently reported at 13.3 percent;
Whereas the racing industry has a long history of providing entertainment 
        throughout the United States;
Whereas racetrack owners and stakeholders have indicated a willingness to comply 
        with appropriate health safety standards in order to continue races 
        while maintaining social distancing protocols;
Whereas health experts have stated the risk of COVID-19 infection is 
        significantly lower outdoors;
Whereas racetrack venues range from 500 to 1,500 acres, ensuring space to 
        accommodate social distancing protocols; and
Whereas inconsistent reopening plans have led to several racetracks being forced 
        to close and cancel events, triggering thousands of dollars in lost 
        investments: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes all speedways as essential businesses; and
            (2) calls on local authorities and Governors to work with 
        racetrack owners and stakeholders to commence outdoor races 
        immediately.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                    
|---------------------------------------------
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                      
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of ILX Resorts Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the six months ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I (We), Joseph P. Martori, Chief Executive Officer, and Margaret M. Eardley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company./s/ Joseph P. Martori_____________________ 
Joseph P. Martori
Chief Executive Officer
August 11, 2004



/s/ Margaret M. Eardley___________________Margaret M. Eardley
Chief Financial Officer
August 11, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 50 (Friday, March 14, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 12200]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6469]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

Ocean Freight Forwarder License Applicants

    Notice is hereby given that the following applicants have filed 
with the Federal Maritime Commission applications for licenses as ocean 
freight forwarders pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 
(46 U.S.C. app. 1718 and 46 CFR part 510).
    Persons knowing of any reason why any of the following applicants 
should not receive a license are requested to contact the Office of 
Freight Forwarders, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, D.C. 
20573.

Marine Air Land International Services, 819 Mitten Road, Suite 15, 
Burlingame, CA 94010, Miguel Angel Lopez, Sole Proprietor
Philip Island International, Inc., 1300 Newark Turnpike, Kearny, NJ 
07032, Officer: Reynaldo M. Gallero, President, Estelita A. Hipolito, 
Vice President.

    Dated: March 10, 1997.
Joseph C. Polking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-6469 Filed 3-13-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
-88 -86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 36

 38

 40

 42

▲ ★

▲ ▲ ▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

08/02

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 02 Aug 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.92 N 77.01 W Meters AGL
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1056 

Supporting the designation of a National Day of Civility. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 20, 2020 

Mr. CRIST (for himself, Mr. JOHNSON of Louisiana, Mr. CLEAVER, Mr. 

FITZPATRICK, Mr. GRIFFITH, Mr. JOYCE of Ohio, Mrs. RODGERS of 

Washington, Mr. SOTO, Mr. RASKIN, Mr. HASTINGS, Mrs. MURPHY of 

Florida, Mr. SUOZZI, Mr. CARSON of Indiana, Mr. GONZALEZ of Texas, 

Mr. PHILLIPS, and Mrs. DINGELL) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the designation of a National Day of Civility. 

Whereas civility involves being nice or polite to others and 

treating others with respect; 

Whereas civil discourse and dialogue are hallmarks of the 

American political and social systems, and these hallmarks have been jeopardized in recent years by growing 

division in and coarsening of our political culture; 

Whereas 9 out of 10 Americans agree incivility leads to intimidation, threats, harassment, discrimination, violence, 

and cyberbullying; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1056 IH 

Whereas a majority of Americans believe incivility in our politics encourages general incivility in society and deters 

citizens from engaging in public service; 

Whereas racial and religious minorities, the homeless, people 

with disabilities, the poor, and law enforcement officers 

report having experienced the most incivility; 

Whereas civility training in schools, a national campaign to 

promote civility, a conscious public effort to practice civility, and a National Day of Civility may combat the 

threats posed by increasing incivility and distrust in our 

institutions; and 

Whereas July 12th would be an appropriate day to designate 

as a National Day of Civility: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the designation of a National Day 

3 of Civility; 

4 (2) encourages a national campaign to promote 

5 civility in our schools, at work, and in our public 

6 spaces; and 

7 (3) calls on all Americans to practice civility. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS