alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Galaxy  Nutritional  Foods, Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended  September  30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Salvatore J. Furnari, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

                                        /s/ Salvatore J. Furnari
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Salvatore J. Furnari
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        November 14, 2003
<PAGE> 1



          EXHIBIT 11 - STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS



<PAGE> 2

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


EXHIBIT 11 - STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS


                                                        Three Months Ended               Six Months Ended
                                                             June 30                          June 30
(in thousands, except per share data)                1998              1997              1998             1997
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic:
-----
<S>                                                 <C>               <C>               <C>              <C>   
Average shares outstanding                           24,496            23,745            24,417           23,712
                                                ============     =============     =============     ============

Net Income                                          $ 9,725           $ 7,994           $19,030          $15,923
                                                ============     =============     =============     ============
Per Share Amount                                    $  0.40           $  0.34             $0.78          $  0.67
                                                ============     =============     =============     ============

Diluted:
-------

Average shares outstanding                           24,496            23,745            24,417           23,712

Net effect of dilutive stock options based
  on the treasury stock method using the
  average market price or quarter end price,
  whichever is greater                                1,054               667             1,113              685
                                                 ------------     -------------     -------------     ------------
                 Total Shares Outstanding            25,550            24,412            25,530           24,397
                                                 ============     =============     =============     ============
Net Income                                          $ 9,725           $ 7,994           $19,030          $15,923
                                                 ============     =============     =============     ============
Per Share Amount                                    $  0.38           $  0.33           $  0.75          $  0.65
                                                 ------------     -------------     -------------     ------------

</TABLE>
Exhibit 99(2)

News Release




The Quaker Oats Company
                           Further Information:
                           Investor Contact:            Media Contact:
Quaker Tower               Margaret M. Eichman, V.P.    Mark Dollins, Director
P.O. Box 049001            Investor Relations           Corp. Communications
Chicago, IL  60604-9001    (312) 222-7817               (312) 222-6914


          
QUAKER ANNOUNCES $1 BILLION STOCK REPURCHASE PROGRAM

For immediate release

     CHICAGO, IL, March 12, 1998 -- The Quaker Oats Company (NYSE:OAT)
today reported that its Board of Directors has authorized the repurchase
of up to $1 billion of the Company's common stock.  The Quaker shares may be
repurchased, from time to time, through open market purchases and
privately negotiated transactions, subject to the availability of shares
and other market and financial conditions.  Quaker has approximately
138,132,000 shares outstanding.

     Robert S. Morrison, Chairman, President and Chief Executive
Officer, said, "This new authorization gives us the flexibility to use
our strong cash flows over the next few years to supplement income
growth with sound financial engineering."

     Since 1985, Quaker has repurchased approximately 49 million shares
of its stock through several repurchase programs.

                                     # # #
                                       
The Quaker Oats Company press releases are available at no charge
through PR Newswire's Company News On-Call Fax Service.  For a menu of
available Quaker Oats Company press releases or to retrieve a specific
release, call 1-800-758-5804, extension 103689.  They are also available
through the Internet:  http://www.quakeroats.com/


 releases or to retrieve a specific
release, call 1-800-758-5804, extension 103689.  They are also available
through the Internet:  http://www.quakeroats.com/
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Provident Bankshares Corporation (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Gary N. Geisel, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Gary N. GeiselGary N. GeiselChief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board


November 9, 2007
# C_2022138EN.01002301.xml

| 28.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/23

---

Action brought on 14 January 2022 — Bensoussan v EUIPO — Lulu’s Fashion Lounge (LOULOU STUDIO)

(Case T-24/22)

(2022/C 138/26)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Ugo Bensoussan (Paris, France) (represented by: V. Bouchara and A. Maier, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Lulu’s Fashion Lounge LLC (Chico, California, United States)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark LOULOU STUDIO — Application for registration No 18 048 245

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 November 2021 in Case R 480/2021-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | uphold the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

—

uphold the appeal;

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO and the company LULU’S FASHION LOUNGE LLC to bear their own costs of the proceedings and to jointly pay those incurred by Mr. Ugo Bensoussan, including the costs incurred for the proceedings before the EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and the company LULU’S FASHION LOUNGE LLC to bear their own costs of the proceedings and to jointly pay those incurred by Mr. Ugo Bensoussan, including the costs incurred for the proceedings before the EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
EXHIBIT 99.1

                               SIMTEK CORPORATION

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Simtek Corporation (the "Company") on
Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ending  September  30,  2002 as  filed  with  the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Douglas
Mitchell,  Chief Executive  Officer and Chief Financial  Officer (Acting) of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant  to U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


November 8, 2002


/s/ Douglas Mitchell
---------------------------------
Douglas Mitchell
Chief Executive Officer and
 Chief Financial Officer (Acting)
No. 12-5710 (12A148).

#### Hooper *v.*Jones, Director, Oklahoma Department of Corrections, et al.

C. A. 10th Cir. *963Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to Justice Sotomayor, and by her referred to the Court, denied. Certiorari denied.
# PTDJl. Channeling the 

### Power of Industry

Power Transmission Distributors Association 230 West Monroe Street Suite 1410 Chicago, lfIinois 60606-4703 USA Phone: +1.312.516.2100 Fax: +1.312.516.2101**E~mail:** ptda@ptda.org www.ptda.org

PTDA 2013 Board of Directors president Christopher Bursack fSC Companies, Inc. First Vice President Kenneth A. Miko BDI Second Vice President Harold Dunaway Motion Industries Inc. Treasurer Keith Nowak MPT Drives, fnc. Immediate Post President Mitch Bouchard General Bearing Service fnc. Manufacturer Council Chair Michael W. Dolpp Thomson Industries Manufacturer Council Vice Choir Brian Kolman BrewerMachine & Gear Co, Directors Ajay Bajaj Rotatorproducts Limited LeRoy Burcroff Bearing Service Inc. William Childers C&UAmericas Thomas R. Clawser Brown Transmission & Bearing Co. Carlton C. Harvey Jamaica Bearfngs Co., Inc. David Mayer Kaman Industria! Technologies Corporation ChiefExecutive Officer Ann Arnott PTOA Executive Vice President The Honorable Steven Chu Secretary, U.S. Department ofEnergy 1000 Independence Ave. SW Washington DC 20585 March 29, 2013

Subject: Endorsement oftheJoint Petition to AdoptJoint Stakeholder Proposal As it Relates to the RulemaJring on Energy Conse1'Vation Standards for Electric Motors, Docket No. EERE-2010-BT -STD-0027 Dear Secretary Chu, The Power Transmission Distributors Association remains committed to and deeply interested in energy efficiency as a means of addressing our nation's energy usage and its continued availability. Recendy, you received the subject petition. We wish to lend our support to this petition's contents and goals. The strength ofthis petition lies in the early, continued collaboration ofthe many stakeholderswho developed it, its straightforwardness and its feasibility. We applaud the combined efforts of manufacturers and energy-efficiency advocates to advance pblicyand regulation in a responsible and meaningful way. We encourage the DOE to adopt the principles and content ofthe petition, so as to begin saving the most energy possible, as soon as possible, as feasibly as possible. The Power Transmission Distributors Association endorses the petition andwe encourage you to give it your complete attention and take immediate action to empower these excellent solutions as soon.as possible. Sincerely,

Christopher Bursack 2012 PTDA President

# PTDA Channeli11g the Power of lttdusfly



### , Power Transmission Distributors Association 230 West Monroe Street, Suite 1410 Chicago, Illinois 60606-4703

The Honorable Steven Chu Secretary, U.S. Department ofEne1'?:? 1000 Independence Ave. SW Washington DC 20585 

## APR 03 2013 

# MAil SANITIZED

Ii'hi! I

## iIij i

## I iiI

## ji!j

## i' ii' 

### j" I 

### j, Ii

## iii Iii1'1i'll1" 

## h "IIi

## n!" Iii
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with Amendment No. 1 to this Quarterly Report of Mayors
Jewelers, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the thirteen weeks ended June
26, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Lawrence R. Litowitz, Interim Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Date: January 7, 2005 /s/ Lawrence R. LitowitzLawrence R. LitowitzInterim
Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 54 (Thursday, March 20, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 13384]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-7033]



[[Page 13384]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-1162-DR]


Arkansas; Amendment to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of Arkansas (FEMA-1162-DR), dated March 2, 1997, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 11, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3260.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster for the State 
of Arkansas, is hereby amended to include the following areas among 
those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the 
catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of March 2, 1997: The counties of Craighead and Pope for 
Individual Assistance and Hazard Mitigation.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 83.516, Disaster 
Assistance.)
Dennis H. Kwiatkowski,
Deputy Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 97-7033 Filed 3-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8933 

To modernize the Advanced Technology Vehicle Manufacturing Incentive 

program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 10, 2020 

Mr. CA ́RDENAS (for himself, Ms. ESHOO, Mr. KINZINGER, and Mr. BURGESS) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To modernize the Advanced Technology Vehicle 

Manufacturing Incentive program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘ATVM Modernization 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ATVM MODERNIZATION. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 136(a)(1) of the Energy 

8 Independence and Security Act of 2007 (42 U.S.C. 

9 17013(a)) is amended by striking paragraph (1) and in10 serting the following: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8933 IH

1 ‘‘(1) ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY VEHICLE.—The 

2 term ‘advanced technology vehicle’ means— 

3 ‘‘(A) an ultra efficient vehicle or a light 

4 duty vehicle that meets— 

5 ‘‘(i) the Bin 5 Tier II emission stand6 ard established in regulations issued by the 

7 Administrator of the Environmental Pro8 tection Agency under section 202(i) of the 

9 Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7521(i)), or a 

10 lower-numbered Bin emission standard; 

11 ‘‘(ii) any new emission standard in ef12 fect for fine particulate matter prescribed 

13 by the Administrator under that Act (42 

14 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.); and 

15 ‘‘(iii) at least 125 percent of the aver16 age base year combined fuel economy for 

17 vehicles with substantially similar at18 tributes; or 

19 ‘‘(B) an aircraft (as defined under section 

20 40102 of title 49, United States Code) that 

21 meets— 

22 ‘‘(i) the appropriate and most recent 

23 emission and fuel economy standards es24 tablished in regulations issued by the Ad25 ministrator of the Environmental ProtecVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:36 Dec 26, 2020 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H8933.IH H8933

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 8933 IH

1 tion Agency, in consultation with the Ad2 ministrator of the Federal Aviation Admin3 istration, under section 231(a) of the 

4 Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7571(a)); and 

5 ‘‘(ii) at least 125 percent of the aver6 age base year fuel economy for aircraft 

7 with substantially similar attributes.’’. 

8 (b) RULEMAKING.—The Secretary of Energy shall 

9 issue an interim final rulemaking updating the ‘‘Advanced 

10 Technology Vehicles Manufacturing Incentive Program’’ 

11 interim final rule (73 Fed. Reg. 66721), as amended and 

12 corrected, to reflect the changes made under this Act with13 in 120 days of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

QUITO I. NEHEMIAH, 

Petitioner

v.

DIRECTOR OF THE OFFICE OF PERSONNEL 

MANAGEMENT, 

Respondent

______________________

2024-1575

______________________

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection 

Board in No. DE-0731-23-0243-I-1.

______________________

O R D E R

The petitioner having failed to pay the docketing fee 

required by Federal Circuit Rule 52 (a) (1) and to file the 

required Statement Concerning Discrimination, it is 

Case: 24-1575 Document: 9 Page: 1 Filed: 05/07/2024
2 NEHEMIAH V. OPM

ORDERED that the petition for review be, and the 

same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in 

accordance with the rules. 

FOR THE COURT

May 7, 2024

Date

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: May 7, 2024

Case: 24-1575 Document: 9 Page: 2 Filed: 05/07/2024
#### Russell Todd LEFF, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORP.; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 15-17465

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted February 13, 2018 *

Filed February 22, 2018

Russell Todd Leff, Pro Se

Dana Jonathon Nitz, Esquire, Attorney, Wright, Finlay & Zak, LLP, Las Vegas, NV, for Defendants-Appellees

Before: LEAVY, FERNANDEZ, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Russell Todd Leff appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his action alleging federal and state law claims arising from foreclosure proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a district court’s dismissal for failure to, state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). *Hebbe v. Pliler,*627 F.3d 338, 341 (9th Cir. 2010). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Leffs Fair Debt Collection Practices Act *599(“FDCPA”) claim because Leff failed to allege facts sufficient to show that any defendant is debt collector within the meaning of the FDCPA. *See*15 U.S.C. § 1692a(6) (defining “debt collector”); *Ho v. ReconTrust Co., NA,*858 F.3d 568, 572 (9th Cir. 2017) (“[A]ctions taken to facilitate a non-judicial foreclosure, such as sending the notice of default and notice of sale, are not attempts to collect ‘debt’ as that term is defined by the FDCPA.”); *Schlegel v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA,*720 F.3d 1204, 1208 (9th Cir. 2013) (complaint “must plead factual content that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference” that defendant is a “debt collector” as defined by the FDCPA (citations and internal quotation marks omitted)).

We reject as unsupported by the record Leff s contention regarding alleged judicial bias.

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued in the opening brief, or arguments and allegations raised for the first time on appeal. *See Padgett v. Wright,*587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

Leffs motions (Docket Entry Nos. 15, 16,19, and 22) are denied.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
#### Cornelius WILLIAMS, Jr. Plaintiff-Appellant v. CORIZON and/or Correctional Medical Services (CMS), et al. Defendants-Appellees

No. 17-2210

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: March 6, 2018

Filed: March 9, 2018

*609Cornelius Williams, Jr., Pro Se

Jessica L. Liss, Amy J. White, Jackson & Lewis, Saint Louis, MO, for Defendants-Appellees

Before LOKEN, KELLY, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In this pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, Cornelius Williams appeals after the district court1 dismissed his complaint, without prejudice, for failure to prosecute or otherwise comply with court orders. He challenges the dismissal and argues he should have been appointed counsel.

Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we conclude that the district court did riot abuse its discretion in dismissing this action without prejudice. Williams’s failed to comply with court-ordered discovery deadlines and failed to appear for his noticed deposition, ignoring the warning given in the court’s scheduling order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(b)(2)(A), (d), 41(b); Lindstedt v. City of Granby, 238 F.3d 933, 937 (8th Cir. 2000) (pro se litigant bound to meet simple discovery requirements); Aziz v. Wright, 34 F.3d 587, 589 (8th Cir. 1994) (Rule 41(b) dismissal not an abuse of district court’s broad discretion to impose sanctions after the court warned that dismissal would be consequence of party’s discovery non-compliance); Schooley v. Kennedy, 712 F.2d 372, 374 (8th Cir. 1983). We also conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Williams appointed counsel in this civil case. See Phillips v. Jasper Cty. Jail, 437 F.3d 791, 794 (8th Cir. 2006) (standard of review).

The judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Ronnie L. White, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.