alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 974 

AN ACT 

To amend the Federal Reserve Act to require the Vice Chairman for Supervision of the Board of Governors of the 

Federal Reserve System to provide a written report, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 974 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Reserve Su3 pervision Testimony Clarification Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. VICE CHAIRMAN FOR SUPERVISION REPORT RE5 QUIREMENT. 

6 Paragraph (12) of section 10 of the Federal Reserve 

7 Act (12 U.S.C. 247b) is amended— 

8 (1) by redesignating such paragraph as para9 graph (11); and 

10 (2) in such paragraph— 

11 (A) by striking ‘‘shall appear’’ and insert12 ing ‘‘shall provide written testimony and ap13 pear’’; and 

14 (B) by adding at the end the following: 

15 ‘‘If, at the time of any appearance described in 

16 this paragraph, the position of Vice Chairman 

17 for Supervision is vacant, the Chairman or their 

18 designee shall appear instead and provide the 

19 required written testimony.’’. 

20 SEC. 3. DETERMINATION OF BUDGETARY EFFECTS. 

21 The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of 

22 complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, 

23 shall be determined by reference to the latest statement 

24 titled ‘‘Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation’’ for this 

25 Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional Record 

26 by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, pro-
3 

•HR 974 EH

1 vided that such statement has been submitted prior to the 

2 vote on passage. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 11, 

2019. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 974 

AN ACT 

To amend the Federal Reserve Act to require the 

vide a written report, and for other purposes. Governors of the Federal Reserve System to proVice Chairman for Supervision of the Board of
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 53 (Wednesday, March 19, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 13209]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6935]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Flight Service Station at Marysville, California, Notice of 
Closure

    Notice is hereby given that on March 14, 1997, the Flight Service 
Station at Marysville, California will close. Services to the general 
aviation public of Marysville, formerly provided by this facility, will 
be provided by the Automated Flight Service Station (AFSS) in Rancho 
Murieta, California. This information will be reflected in the next 
issue of the FAA Organization Statement.

(Sec. 313(a), 72 Stat. 752, 49 U.S.C. 1354)

    Issued in Lawndale, California, on March 11, 1997.
William C. Withycombe,
Regional Administrator, Western-Pacific Region.
[FR Doc. 97-6935 Filed 3-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-13-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF NORTHLAND CRANBERRIES, INC. AS OF AND FOR
THE 9 MONTHS ENDED MAY 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                                             186
<SECURITIES>                                     1,260
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,635
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     21,787
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                34,452
<PP&E>                                         159,959
<DEPRECIATION>                                  22,189
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 176,129
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,160
<BONDS>                                         79,669
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           138
<OTHER-SE>                                      67,788
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   176,129
<SALES>                                         34,496
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                34,810
<CGS>                                           16,233
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,010
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,156
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,411
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,157
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,254
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,254
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.23
        

</TABLE>
No. 11-10898.

#### Juvenile Male et al. *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**EXHIBIT (32.1)****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Albany International Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Joseph G. Morone, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Michael K. Burke, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| (1)      | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                            |
|-------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                    |                                                                                                                                                 |
| (2)      | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|                      |                                                   |
|----------------------|---------------------------------------------------|
|                 |                                              |
| Date: August 9, 2010 |                                              |
|                 | By /s/ Joseph G. Morone                           |
|                 | Joseph G. Morone                                  |
|                 | President and Chief Executive Officer             |
|                 | (Principal Executive Officer)                     |
|                 |
|                 | By /s/ Michael K. Burke                           |
|                 | Michael K. Burke                                  |
|                 | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|                 | (Principal Financial Officer)                     |

----
No. 12-5298.

#### Fontanez *v.*Holt, Warden, et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-10448.

#### Wiggins *v.*Lee, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1200 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1200

     Supporting the goals and ideals of National Rural Health Day.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 23, 2020

Ms. Finkenauer (for herself, Mr. Latta, Mr. O'Halleran, Mr. Cole, Mrs. 
 Axne, Mr. LaHood, Mr. Kind, Mr. Loebsack, Mrs. Rodgers of Washington, 
 Ms. Torres Small of New Mexico, Mr. Newhouse, Mr. Cox of California, 
Mr. Balderson, Mr. Bost, Ms. Craig, Ms. Blunt Rochester, Ms. Stefanik, 
Mr. Taylor, Ms. Sewell of Alabama, Mr. Young, Mr. Keller, Mrs. Bustos, 
 Mr. Peterson, Mr. Cartwright, and Mr. Harder of California) submitted 
the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy 
                              and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
     Supporting the goals and ideals of National Rural Health Day.

Whereas about 60,000,000 hard-working individuals in the United States live in 
        rural communities;
Whereas rural individuals in the United States are increasingly facing barriers 
        to accessing the health care services they need;
Whereas rural health facilities in the United States have faced systemic 
        challenges, including low reimbursements, physician workforce shortages, 
        and difficulty accessing certain technologies like telehealth;
Whereas these challenges have contributed to 132 rural hospital closures since 
        2010;
Whereas these challenges have made it more difficult for all rural health care 
        facilities to keep their doors open and serve patients;
Whereas National Rural Health Day was established to emphasize the importance of 
        rural areas of the United States and recognize the efforts and 
        contributions to address the unique challenges in rural health care;
Whereas the National Organization of State Offices of Rural Health has 
        recognized National Rural Health Day the third Thursday of each November 
        since 2010; and
Whereas National Rural Health Day will be celebrated this year on November 19, 
        2020: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the goals and ideals of National Rural Health 
        Day;
            (2) celebrates rural health care providers and the millions 
        of individuals in the United States they serve; and
            (3) expresses commitment to advancing policy to improve 
        health care accessibility and affordability in rural areas of 
        the United States.
                                 <all>
```
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-16-00534-CR

Crae Robert Pease, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 9 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. C-1-CR-15-153365, HONORABLE KIM WILLIAMS, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Crae Robert Pease, appearing pro se, filed an interlocutoryappeal from the

trial court’s denial of his right to defend himself in a criminal hearing. In criminal cases, unless

expressly authorized by statute, appellate courts only have jurisdiction to review final judgments of

conviction. Abbott v. State, 271 S.W.3d 694, 696-97 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008) (standard for

determining jurisdiction is not whether appeal is precluded by law but whether appeal is authorized

by law). In criminal cases, an appeal is authorized only when a trial court “enters a judgment of guilt

or other appealable order.” Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2); see Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 44.02 (“A

defendant in any criminal action has the right of appeal under the rules hereinafter prescribed . . . .”). 

“[A] defendant’s right of appeal is a statutorily created right.” See Bayless v. State, 91 S.W.3d 801,

805 (Tex. Crim. App. 2002). No statute authorizes an interlocutory appeal of a defendant’s request

for self-representation. Cf. Blankenship v. State, 673 S.W.2d 578, 583-84 (Tex. Crim. App. 1984)
(addressing denial of right to self-representation in appeal from final judgment and

applying standards set out in Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 819 (1975)); Ex parte Ahmad,

No. 14-16-00175-CR, ___ S.W.3d ___, 2016 WL3362633, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.]

June 16, 2016) (per curiam) (holding courts of appeals lack jurisdiction to consider appeal of trial

court’s denial of pretrial habeas corpus because claim for self-representation was not cognizable on

pretrial habeas). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App.

P. 43.2(f).

__________________________________________

Cindy Olson Bourland, Justice

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Goodwin and Bourland

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: September 14, 2016

Do Not Publish

2
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 909 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to provide parity among 

States in the timing of the application of higher Federal Medicaid matching rates for the ACA-expansion population. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 30, 2019 

Mr. LEWIS (for himself, Ms. SEWELL of Alabama, and Mr. BISHOP of Georgia) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to provide 

parity among States in the timing of the application 

of higher Federal Medicaid matching rates for the ACAexpansion population. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicaid Expansion 

5 Parity Act of 2019’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 909 IH

1 SEC. 2. PARITY IN THE TIMING OF THE APPLICATION OF 

2 HIGHER MEDICAID FEDERAL MATCHING 

3 RATES FOR ACA NEWLY ELIGIBLE INDIVID4 UALS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1905(y)(1) of the Social 

6 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396d(y)(1)) is amended— 

7 (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘for cal8 endar quarters in 2014, 2015, and 2016’’ and in9 serting ‘‘for calendar quarters in the 12-calendar10 quarter period beginning with the first calendar 

11 quarter in which the State provides medical assist12 ance to newly eligible individuals’’; 

13 (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘for cal14 endar quarters in 2017’’ and inserting ‘‘for the next 

15 4 calendar quarters for such State’’; 

16 (3) in subparagraph (C), by striking ‘‘for cal17 endar quarters in 2018’’ and inserting ‘‘for the next 

18 4 calendar quarters for such State’’; 

19 (4) in subparagraph (D), by striking ‘‘for cal20 endar quarters in 2019’’ and inserting ‘‘for the next 

21 4 calendar quarters for such State’’; and 

22 (5) in subparagraph (E), by striking ‘‘for cal23 endar quarters in 2020 and each year thereafter’’ 

24 and inserting ‘‘for each succeeding calendar quarter 

25 for such State’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 909 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 subsection (a) shall take effect as if included in the enact3 ment of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
# C_2022148EN.01004502.xml

| 4.4.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.4.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/45

---

Action brought on 21 February 2022 — Ilunga Luyoyo v Council

(Case T-97/22)

(2022/C 148/61)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Ferdinand Ilunga Luyoyo (Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo) (represented by: T. Bontinck, P. De Wolf, A. Guillerme and T. Payan, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should

| — | annul Council decision (CFSP) 2021/2181 of 9 December 2021 (1) in so far as the applicant remains at No 3 in the annex to that decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Council decision (CFSP) 2021/2181 of 9 December 2021 (1) in so far as the applicant remains at No 3 in the annex to that decision;

| — | annul Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2177 of 9 December 2021 (2) in so far as the applicant remains at No 3 in Annex I to that regulation; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2177 of 9 December 2021 (2) in so far as the applicant remains at No 3 in Annex I to that regulation;

| — | order the Council to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law, which are, in essence, identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-90/22, Kande Mupompa v Council.

---

(1)  Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/2181 of 9 December 2021, amending decision 2010/788/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic Republic of the Congo (OJ 2021 L 443, p. 75).

(2)  Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2181 of 9 December 2021 implementing Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005 imposing certain restrictive measures directed against persons acting in violation of the arms embargo with regard to the Democratic Republic of Congo (OJ 2021 L 443, p. 3).

---
| (logo) WELLS  FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon Street  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

** **

ReferenceisherebymadetothatcertainPoolingandServicingAgreementdated as of July 1, 2015, by and among WELLSFARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGESECURITIES,INC.,as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONALASSOCIATION,as Master Servicer, RIALTOCAPITALADVISORS,LLC,asSpecialServicer,PENTALPHASURVEILLANCELLC,as Trust Advisor, WELLS FARGO BANK,NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, as Tax Administrator and asCustodian and WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, with respectto Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-NXS2 (the "Agreement").Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meaningsassigned in theAgreement.

 

Pursuantto Section 11.12 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice Presidentof Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.       Areview of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision,and

 

2.       Tothe best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, hasfulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the ReportingPeriod.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned hasexecuted this Certificate as of the 28th day ofFebruary2018.

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo)  Together we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
No. 11-10603.

#### Higgins *v.*Consolidated Rail Corporation et al.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEETS, THE STATEMENTS OF INCOME, AND THE STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          18,745
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,060
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,092
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                34,436
<PP&E>                                          13,475
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,608
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  50,271
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,559
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     19,932
<COMMON>                                           166
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,585
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    50,271
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                71,299
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   40,844
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                28,330
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (849)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,974
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,853)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,827
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,827
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .51


</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Omar QAZI, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 17-10004

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted February 16, 2018 * San Francisco, California

Filed February 26, 2018

Elizabeth Olson White, Esquire, Assistant U.S.'Attorney, USRE—Office of the US Attorney-Reno, Reno, NV, for Plaintiff-Appellant

Mario D. Valencia, Esquire, Attorney, Mario D. Valencia, Attorney At Law, Henderson, NV, for Defendant-Appellee

Before: BEA and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges, and LASNIK,** District Judge.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. . *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

**

 The Honorable Robert S. Lasnik, United States District Judge for the Western District of Washington, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM ***

The government appeals the district court’s order suppressing Omar Qazi’s post-arrest statements upon finding that Qazi was given a deficient *Miranda v. Arizona,*384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), warning. We have jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3731, and we reverse.

Qazi argues that the *Miranda*warning was insufficient because it failed to inform him that he had a right to an attorney “before and during questioning” and that the statement given was merely the *Miranda*Court’s “summary,” not its holding. We review the sufficiency of a *Miranda*warning de novo. *United States v. Loudous,*847 F.3d 1146, 1148-49 (9th Cir. 2017).

*Miranda*held that “the following measures are required”: “Prior to any questioning, the person must be warned that ... *he has a right to the presence of an attorney.”*384 U.S. at 444, 86 S.Ct. 1602 (emphasis added); *see also id.*at 478-79, 86 S.Ct. 1602 (reiterating similar language). Qazi was informed: “You have the right to the presence of an attorney.” “[W]e emphasize that while Supreme Court case law does not require a verbatim recitation of *Miranda’s*warnings, *it does not proscribe it either.” Loucious,*847 F.3d at 1151 (emphasis added). Here, the *Miranda*warning given to Qazi was nearly verbatim to the language in *Miranda,*changing only the pronoun and the verb. Qazi was not given an insufficient *Miranda*warning.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.