Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 52 / Tuesday, March 18, 1997 / Notices 12799

making level of trade comparisons and

adjustments for its final results of

review.

Because both respondents made sales

at differing levels of trade in the home

market and in the United States, and

because we determined it was not

possible to quantify the price

differences resulting from the differing

levels of trade, we made a CEP offset to

NV for both respondents pursuant to

section 773(a)(7)(B) of the Act. The CEP

offset consisted of an amount equal to

the lesser of the weighted-average U.S.

indirect selling expenses and U.S.

commissions or home market indirect

selling expenses. No other adjustments

were claimed or allowed.

Preliminary Results of the Review

As a result of this review, we

preliminarily determine that the

following weighted-average dumping

margins exist for the POR:

Manufacturer/exporter Percent

margin

Hyundai Electronic Industries,

Inc .......................................... 0.01

LG Semicon Co., Ltd ................ 0.02

The Department shall determine, and

Customs shall assess, antidumping

duties on all appropriate entries.

Individual differences between United

States price and NV may vary from the

percentages stated above. The

Department will issue appraisement

instructions directly to Customs. The

final results of this review shall be the

basis for the assessment of antidumping

duties on entries of merchandise

covered by the determination and for

future deposits of estimated duties.

Furthermore, the following deposit

requirements will be effective upon

completion of the final results of these

administrative reviews for all shipments

of DRAMs from Korea entered, or

withdrawn from warehouse, for

consumption on or after publication

date of the final results of these

administrative reviews, as provided by

section 751(a)(1) of the Act: (1) The cash

deposit rates for Hyundai and LGS,

because their weighted-average margins

were de minimis, will be zero percent;

(2) for merchandise exported by

manufacturers or exporters not covered

in this review but covered in the

original LTFV investigation or a

previous review, the cash deposit will

continue to be the most recent rate

published in the final determination or

final results for which the manufacturer

or exporter received a company-specific

rate; (3) if the exporter is not a firm

covered in this review, a previous

review, or the original investigation, but

the manufacturer is, the cash deposit

rate will be that established for the

manufacturer of the merchandise in the

final results of the most recent review,

or the LTFV investigation; and (4) if

neither the exporter nor the

manufacturer is a firm covered in this or

any previous reviews, the cash deposit

rate will be 3.85 percent, the ‘‘allothers’’ rate established in the LTFV

investigation. These deposit

requirements, when imposed, shall

remain in effect until publication of the

final results of the next administrative

review.

Interested parties may request

disclosure within five days of the date

of publication of this notice, and may

request a hearing within ten days of the

date of publication. Any hearing, if

requested, will be held as early as

convenient for the parties but not later

than 44 days after the date of

publication or the first work day

thereafter. Case briefs or other written

comments from interested parties may

be submitted not later than 30 days after

the date of publication of this notice.

Rebuttal briefs and rebuttal comments,

limited to issues in the case briefs, may

be filed not later than 37 days after the

date of publication of this notice. The

Department will publish the final

results of this administrative review,

including the results of its analysis of

issues raised in any such written

comments.

This notice serves as a preliminary

reminder to importers of their

responsibility under 19 CFR 353.26(b) to

file a certificate regarding the

reimbursement of antidumping duties

prior to liquidation of the relevant

entries during this review period.

Failure to comply with this requirement

could result in the Secretary’s

presumption that reimbursement of

antidumping duties occurred and the

subsequent assessment of double

antidumping duties.

This administrative review and notice

are in accordance with section 751(a)(1)

of the Tariff Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)(1))

and 19 CFR 353.22.

Dated: March 10, 1997.

Robert S. LaRussa,

Acting Assistant Secretary for Import

Administration.

[FR Doc. 97–6679 Filed 3–17–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

Export Trade Certificate of Review

AGENCY: International Trade

Administration, Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of revocation of Export

Trade Certificate of Review No. 85–

00004.

SUMMARY: The Secretary of Commerce

issued an export trade certificate of

review to Trust International Services

Company, Inc. Because this certificate

holder has failed to file an annual report

as required by law, the Secretary is

revoking the certificate. This notice

summarizes the notification letter sent

to Trust International Services

Company, Inc.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: W.

Dawn Busby, Director, Office of Export

Trading Company Affairs, International

Trade Administration, 202/482–5l3l.

This is not a toll-free number.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title III of

the Export Trading Company Act of

1982 (’’the Act’’) (Pub. L. 97–290, 15

U.S.C. 4011–21) authorizes the

Secretary of Commerce to issue export

trade certificates of review. The

regulations implementing Title III (’’the

Regulations’’) are found at 15 CFR part

325 (1996). Pursuant to this authority, a

certificate of review was issued on May

9, 1985 to Trust International Services

Company, Inc.

A certificate holder is required by law

to submit to the Department of

Commerce annual reports that update

financial and other information relating

to business activities covered by its

certificate (Section 308 of the Act, 15

U.S.C. 4018, § 235.14 (a) of the

Regulations, 15 CFR 325.14 (a)). The

annual report is due within 45 days

after the anniversary date of the

issuance of the certificate of review

(§ 325.14 (b) of the regulations, 15 CFR

325.14 (b)). Failure to submit a complete

annual report may be the basis for

revocation (§§ 325.10(a) and 325.14(c) of

the Regulations, 15 CFR 325.10(a) (3)

and 325.14(c)).

On April 29, 1996, the Department of

Commerce sent to Trust International

Services Company, Inc. a letter

containing annual report questions with

a reminder that its annual report was

due on June 23, 1996. Additional

reminders were sent on October 28,

1996 and on January 3, 1997. The

Department has received no written

response from Trust International

Services Company, Inc. to any of these

letters.

On February 4, 1997, and in

accordance with § 325.10 (c) (2) of the

Regulations, (15 CFR 325.10 (c) (2)), the

Department of Commerce sent a letter

by certified mail to notify Trust

International Services Company, Inc.

that the Department was formally

initiating the process to revoke its

certificate for failure to file an annual
12800 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 52 / Tuesday, March 18, 1997 / Notices

report. In addition, a summary of this

letter allowing Trust International

Services Company, Inc. thirty days to

respond was published in the Federal

Register on February 10, 1997 at 62 FR

5961. Pursuant to § 325.10(c) (2) of the

Regulations (15 CFR 325.10(c) (2)), the

Department considers the failure of

Trust International Services Company,

Inc. to respond to be an admission of the

statements contained in the notification

letter.

The Department has determined to

revoke the certificate issued to Trust

International Services Company, Inc. for

its failure to file an annual report. The

Department has sent a letter, dated

March 13, 1997, to notify Trust

International Services Company, Inc. of

its determination. The revocation is

effective thirty (30) days from the date

of publication of this notice. Any person

aggrieved by this decision may appeal to

an appropriate U.S. district court within

30 days from the date on which this

notice is published in the Federal

Register (325.10(c) (4) and 325.11 of the

Regulations, 15 CFR 324.10(c) (4) and

325.11 of the Regulations, 15 CFR

325.10(c) (4) and 325.11).

Dated: March 13, 1997.

W. Dawn Busby,

Director, Office of Export Trading Company

Affairs.

[FR Doc. 97–6796 Filed 3–17–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P

National Oceanic and Atmospheric

Administration

[I.D. 031097D]

North Pacific Fishery Management

Council; Meetings

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),

Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public committee

meetings.

SUMMARY: Two committees of the North

Pacific Fishery Management Council

(Council) will meet in Seattle, WA, in

April. The Improved Retention/

Improved Utilization (IR/IU) Committee

will meet April 1, 1997, beginning at

8:30 a.m. The Vessel Bycatch

Accountability (VBA) Committee will

meet April 2–3, 1997, beginning at 9:00

a.m. on April 2, continuing into April 3,

as necessary.

ADDRESSES: The meetings will be held at

the Alaska Fisheries Science Center,

7600 Sand Point Way, NE., Building 4,

Room 2039, Seattle, WA 98115.

Council address: North Pacific

Fishery Management Council, 605 W.

4th Ave., Suite 306, Anchorage, AK

99501–2252.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Chris Oliver, telephone: (907) 271–2809.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

1. The IR/IU Committee will meet to

review the Proposed Rule for

regulations for improved retention and

utilization of groundfish in the Bering

Sea and Aleutian Islands. The

Committee will also review a

preliminary draft of similar regulatory

measures for Gulf of Alaska groundfish

and prepare recommendations for the

Council.

2. The VBA Committee has been

tasked with identifying alternatives to

be addressed in an analysis for a

program to implement individual vessel

bycatch accounting measures.