Facility _Information

facility _id utility

_code legal_owner_nam e

legl_operator_name

legal_address_type

legal_address

legal_city legal_state legal_zip 6181 16604 The City of San Antonio acting by and through the Board of Trustees of City Public Service The City of San Antonio acting by and through the Board of Trustees of City Public Service legal owner145 Navarro St. San Antonio

TX 78296 7097 16604 The City of San Antonio acting by and through the Board of Trustees of City Public Service The City of San Antonio acting by and through the Board of Trustees of City Public Service legal owner145 Navarro St. San Antonio

TX 78296

Page 1Facility _Information

plant_nam e

physical_address

phyical_city

physical_state

physical_zip

ma iling_address

ma iling_city

ma iling_state

ma iling_zip J T Deely 9599 Gardner Rd. San Antonio

TX 78263 9599 Gardner Rd. San Antonio

TX 78263 J K Spruce 9599 Garner Rd. San Antonio

TX 78263 9599 Garner Rd. San Antonio

TX 78263

Page 2Facility _Information

RFA_small_entity

ff_fired_coal

ff_fired_oil ff_fired_ngas ff_fired_petcoke

ff_fired_other

ff_permitted_coal

ff_permitted_oil

ff_permitted_ngas No TRUE FALSE TRUE FALSE FALSE TRUE TRUE TRUE No TRUE FALSE TRUE FALSE FALSE TRUE FALSE TRUE

Page 3Facility _Information

ff_permitted_petcoke

ff_permitted_other

deviation_reporting

continuous_emissions

cem_provided

facility _note FALSE FALSE deviation reports are due on a semi-annual basis to the TCEQ, however, we have chosen to send the reports in every Quarter along with our Quarterly emission reports to the EPA Yes Facility Information:Boiler Information:The Design and Operating Pressures listed are both throttle pressures.Test Report Emissions Data: For the test in June 2007, the unit load is for both JTD1 and JTD2 combined, because they were tested at the common stack. This test included a sulfuric acid mist test, but it was not on the drop down menu, so the results were not entered.The test for PM, sufuric acid and THC were all ran at different times on 6/12/2007. Each pollutant had it's own runs 1, 2, 3 and average in the test report. The system would not let me enter runs 1, 2, 3 and average twice. Runs 1, 2, 3 and average contain the PM data. Runs 4, 5, 6, and 7 with 7 being the average of 4, 5, and 6 for THC.Data cells left empty are due to the report not containing the data requested.For stack tests that say "voluntary", we m ean we did the test for internal use, not due to permit or regulatory requirements.The only choices from the drop down menu for the flow rate units of measure wer FALSE FALSE Deviations are reported on a Quarterly basis to the TCEQ. The requirement is to report them on a semi-annual basis, but they are reported quarterly

along with our em ission reports to the EPA. Yes Facility and Fuel Information: Boiler Information: For 7097 J K Spruce Unit 2 (BLR2): J K Spruce Unit 2 is not commercially operating yet, so design parmaters are listed, but "present" operating data is not available yet. Any other questions left blank for BLR2 are because there is not data available yet.The Design and Operating Pressures listed are the throttle pressures.Unit Configurations: For JK Spruce Unit 2 (BLR2) the SCR (2SCR) was not operating yet as of 3/08/2010. JK Spruce Unit 2 is not planned to be operating commercially until m id 2010, the SCR will be operating around that tim eframe.Test Emissions Reports: The JKS Unit 1 Test Report for May 2006 included Sulfuric Acid and Fluoride, but since they were not choices on the drop menu list, the data for those runs was not entered.The JKS Unit 1 Test Report for June 2009 had a HF test with three runs and an average on 6/3/2009 and three runs with an average for metals on 6/2/2009. HF is entered as runs 1, 2, 3 and average and

Page 4Facility _Information

Facility Information:Boiler Information:The Design and Operating Pressures listed are both throttle pressures.Test Report Emissions Data: For the test in June 2007, the unit load is for both JTD1 and JTD2 combined, because they were tested at the common stack. This test included a sulfuric acid mist test, but it was not on the drop down menu, so the results were not entered.The test for PM, sufuric acid and THC were all ran at different times on 6/12/2007. Each pollutant had it's own runs 1, 2, 3 and average in the test report. The system would not let me enter runs 1, 2, 3 and average twice. Runs 1, 2, 3 and average contain the PM data. Runs 4, 5, 6, and 7 with 7 being the average of 4, 5, and 6 for THC.Data cells left empty are due to the report not containing the data requested.For stack tests that say "voluntary", we m ean we did the test for internal use, not due to permit or regulatory requirements.The only choices from the drop down menu for the flow rate units of measure wer Facility and Fuel Information: Boiler Information: For 7097 J K Spruce Unit 2 (BLR2): J K Spruce Unit 2 is not commercially operating yet, so design parmaters are listed, but "present" operating data is not available yet. Any other questions left blank for BLR2 are because there is not data available yet.The Design and Operating Pressures listed are the throttle pressures.Unit Configurations: For JK Spruce Unit 2 (BLR2) the SCR (2SCR) was not operating yet as of 3/08/2010. JK Spruce Unit 2 is not planned to be operating commercially until m id 2010, the SCR will be operating around that tim eframe.Test Emissions Reports: The JKS Unit 1 Test Report for May 2006 included Sulfuric Acid and Fluoride, but since they were not choices on the drop menu list, the data for those runs was not entered.The JKS Unit 1 Test Report for June 2009 had a HF test with three runs and an average on 6/3/2009 and three runs with an average for metals on 6/2/2009. HF is entered as runs 1, 2, 3 and average and

Page 5Facility _Information

Facility Information:Boiler Information:The Design and Operating Pressures listed are both throttle pressures.Test Report Emissions Data: For the test in June 2007, the unit load is for both JTD1 and JTD2 combined, because they were tested at the common stack. This test included a sulfuric acid mist test, but it was not on the drop down menu, so the results were not entered.The test for PM, sufuric acid and THC were all ran at different times on 6/12/2007. Each pollutant had it's own runs 1, 2, 3 and average in the test report. The system would not let me enter runs 1, 2, 3 and average twice. Runs 1, 2, 3 and average contain the PM data. Runs 4, 5, 6, and 7 with 7 being the average of 4, 5, and 6 for THC.Data cells left empty are due to the report not containing the data requested.For stack tests that say "voluntary", we m ean we did the test for internal use, not due to permit or regulatory requirements.The only choices from the drop down menu for the flow rate units of measure wer Facility and Fuel Information: Boiler Information: For 7097 J K Spruce Unit 2 (BLR2): J K Spruce Unit 2 is not commercially operating yet, so design parmaters are listed, but "present" operating data is not available yet. Any other questions left blank for BLR2 are because there is not data available yet.The Design and Operating Pressures listed are the throttle pressures.Unit Configurations: For JK Spruce Unit 2 (BLR2) the SCR (2SCR) was not operating yet as of 3/08/2010. JK Spruce Unit 2 is not planned to be operating commercially until m id 2010, the SCR will be operating around that tim eframe.Test Emissions Reports: The JKS Unit 1 Test Report for May 2006 included Sulfuric Acid and Fluoride, but since they were not choices on the drop menu list, the data for those runs was not entered.The JKS Unit 1 Test Report for June 2009 had a HF test with three runs and an average on 6/3/2009 and three runs with an average for metals on 6/2/2009. HF is entered as runs 1, 2, 3 and average and

Page 6Facility _Information

Facility Information:Boiler Information:The Design and Operating Pressures listed are both throttle pressures.Test Report Emissions Data: For the test in June 2007, the unit load is for both JTD1 and JTD2 combined, because they were tested at the common stack. This test included a sulfuric acid mist test, but it was not on the drop down menu, so the results were not entered.The test for PM, sufuric acid and THC were all ran at different times on 6/12/2007. Each pollutant had it's own runs 1, 2, 3 and average in the test report. The system would not let me enter runs 1, 2, 3 and average twice. Runs 1, 2, 3 and average contain the PM data. Runs 4, 5, 6, and 7 with 7 being the average of 4, 5, and 6 for THC.Data cells left empty are due to the report not containing the data requested.For stack tests that say "voluntary", we m ean we did the test for internal use, not due to permit or regulatory requirements.The only choices from the drop down menu for the flow rate units of measure wer Facility and Fuel Information: Boiler Information: For 7097 J K Spruce Unit 2 (BLR2): J K Spruce Unit 2 is not commercially operating yet, so design parmaters are listed, but "present" operating data is not available yet. Any other questions left blank for BLR2 are because there is not data available yet.The Design and Operating Pressures listed are the throttle pressures.Unit Configurations: For JK Spruce Unit 2 (BLR2) the SCR (2SCR) was not operating yet as of 3/08/2010. JK Spruce Unit 2 is not planned to be operating commercially until m id 2010, the SCR will be operating around that tim eframe.Test Emissions Reports: The JKS Unit 1 Test Report for May 2006 included Sulfuric Acid and Fluoride, but since they were not choices on the drop menu list, the data for those runs was not entered.The JKS Unit 1 Test Report for June 2009 had a HF test with three runs and an average on 6/3/2009 and three runs with an average for metals on 6/2/2009. HF is entered as runs 1, 2, 3 and average and

Page 7Facility _Information

Facility Information:Boiler Information:The Design and Operating Pressures listed are both throttle pressures.Test Report Emissions Data: For the test in June 2007, the unit load is for both JTD1 and JTD2 combined, because they were tested at the common stack. This test included a sulfuric acid mist test, but it was not on the drop down menu, so the results were not entered.The test for PM, sufuric acid and THC were all ran at different times on 6/12/2007. Each pollutant had it's own runs 1, 2, 3 and average in the test report. The system would not let me enter runs 1, 2, 3 and average twice. Runs 1, 2, 3 and average contain the PM data. Runs 4, 5, 6, and 7 with 7 being the average of 4, 5, and 6 for THC.Data cells left empty are due to the report not containing the data requested.For stack tests that say "voluntary", we m ean we did the test for internal use, not due to permit or regulatory requirements.The only choices from the drop down menu for the flow rate units of measure wer Facility and Fuel Information: Boiler Information: For 7097 J K Spruce Unit 2 (BLR2): J K Spruce Unit 2 is not commercially operating yet, so design parmaters are listed, but "present" operating data is not available yet. Any other questions left blank for BLR2 are because there is not data available yet.The Design and Operating Pressures listed are the throttle pressures.Unit Configurations: For JK Spruce Unit 2 (BLR2) the SCR (2SCR) was not operating yet as of 3/08/2010. JK Spruce Unit 2 is not planned to be operating commercially until m id 2010, the SCR will be operating around that tim eframe.Test Emissions Reports: The JKS Unit 1 Test Report for May 2006 included Sulfuric Acid and Fluoride, but since they were not choices on the drop menu list, the data for those runs was not entered.The JKS Unit 1 Test Report for June 2009 had a HF test with three runs and an average on 6/3/2009 and three runs with an average for metals on 6/2/2009. HF is entered as runs 1, 2, 3 and average and

Page 8Facility _Information

Facility Information:Boiler Information:The Design and Operating Pressures listed are both throttle pressures.Test Report Emissions Data: For the test in June 2007, the unit load is for both JTD1 and JTD2 combined, because they were tested at the common stack. This test included a sulfuric acid mist test, but it was not on the drop down menu, so the results were not entered.The test for PM, sufuric acid and THC were all ran at different times on 6/12/2007. Each pollutant had it's own runs 1, 2, 3 and average in the test report. The system would not let me enter runs 1, 2, 3 and average twice. Runs 1, 2, 3 and average contain the PM data. Runs 4, 5, 6, and 7 with 7 being the average of 4, 5, and 6 for THC.Data cells left empty are due to the report not containing the data requested.For stack tests that say "voluntary", we m ean we did the test for internal use, not due to permit or regulatory requirements.The only choices from the drop down menu for the flow rate units of measure wer Facility and Fuel Information: Boiler Information: For 7097 J K Spruce Unit 2 (BLR2): J K Spruce Unit 2 is not commercially operating yet, so design parmaters are listed, but "present" operating data is not available yet. Any other questions left blank for BLR2 are because there is not data available yet.The Design and Operating Pressures listed are the throttle pressures.Unit Configurations: For JK Spruce Unit 2 (BLR2) the SCR (2SCR) was not operating yet as of 3/08/2010. JK Spruce Unit 2 is not planned to be operating commercially until m id 2010, the SCR will be operating around that tim eframe.Test Emissions Reports: The JKS Unit 1 Test Report for May 2006 included Sulfuric Acid and Fluoride, but since they were not choices on the drop menu list, the data for those runs was not entered.The JKS Unit 1 Test Report for June 2009 had a HF test with three runs and an average on 6/3/2009 and three runs with an average for metals on 6/2/2009. HF is entered as runs 1, 2, 3 and average and

Page 9Facility _Information

Facility Information:Boiler Information:The Design and Operating Pressures listed are both throttle pressures.Test Report Emissions Data: For the test in June 2007, the unit load is for both JTD1 and JTD2 combined, because they were tested at the common stack. This test included a sulfuric acid mist test, but it was not on the drop down menu, so the results were not entered.The test for PM, sufuric acid and THC were all ran at different times on 6/12/2007. Each pollutant had it's own runs 1, 2, 3 and average in the test report. The system would not let me enter runs 1, 2, 3 and average twice. Runs 1, 2, 3 and average contain the PM data. Runs 4, 5, 6, and 7 with 7 being the average of 4, 5, and 6 for THC.Data cells left empty are due to the report not containing the data requested.For stack tests that say "voluntary", we m ean we did the test for internal use, not due to permit or regulatory requirements.The only choices from the drop down menu for the flow rate units of measure wer Facility and Fuel Information: Boiler Information: For 7097 J K Spruce Unit 2 (BLR2): J K Spruce Unit 2 is not commercially operating yet, so design parmaters are listed, but "present" operating data is not available yet. Any other questions left blank for BLR2 are because there is not data available yet.The Design and Operating Pressures listed are the throttle pressures.Unit Configurations: For JK Spruce Unit 2 (BLR2) the SCR (2SCR) was not operating yet as of 3/08/2010. JK Spruce Unit 2 is not planned to be operating commercially until m id 2010, the SCR will be operating around that tim eframe.Test Emissions Reports: The JKS Unit 1 Test Report for May 2006 included Sulfuric Acid and Fluoride, but since they were not choices on the drop menu list, the data for those runs was not entered.The JKS Unit 1 Test Report for June 2009 had a HF test with three runs and an average on 6/3/2009 and three runs with an average for metals on 6/2/2009. HF is entered as runs 1, 2, 3 and average and

Page 10Facility _Information

Facility Information:Boiler Information:The Design and Operating Pressures listed are both throttle pressures.Test Report Emissions Data: For the test in June 2007, the unit load is for both JTD1 and JTD2 combined, because they were tested at the common stack. This test included a sulfuric acid mist test, but it was not on the drop down menu, so the results were not entered.The test for PM, sufuric acid and THC were all ran at different times on 6/12/2007. Each pollutant had it's own runs 1, 2, 3 and average in the test report. The system would not let me enter runs 1, 2, 3 and average twice. Runs 1, 2, 3 and average contain the PM data. Runs 4, 5, 6, and 7 with 7 being the average of 4, 5, and 6 for THC.Data cells left empty are due to the report not containing the data requested.For stack tests that say "voluntary", we m ean we did the test for internal use, not due to permit or regulatory requirements.The only choices from the drop down menu for the flow rate units of measure wer Facility and Fuel Information: Boiler Information: For 7097 J K Spruce Unit 2 (BLR2): J K Spruce Unit 2 is not commercially operating yet, so design parmaters are listed, but "present" operating data is not available yet. Any other questions left blank for BLR2 are because there is not data available yet.The Design and Operating Pressures listed are the throttle pressures.Unit Configurations: For JK Spruce Unit 2 (BLR2) the SCR (2SCR) was not operating yet as of 3/08/2010. JK Spruce Unit 2 is not planned to be operating commercially until m id 2010, the SCR will be operating around that tim eframe.Test Emissions Reports: The JKS Unit 1 Test Report for May 2006 included Sulfuric Acid and Fluoride, but since they were not choices on the drop menu list, the data for those runs was not entered.The JKS Unit 1 Test Report for June 2009 had a HF test with three runs and an average on 6/3/2009 and three runs with an average for metals on 6/2/2009. HF is entered as runs 1, 2, 3 and average and

Page 11Facility _Information

Facility Information:Boiler Information:The Design and Operating Pressures listed are both throttle pressures.Test Report Emissions Data: For the test in June 2007, the unit load is for both JTD1 and JTD2 combined, because they were tested at the common stack. This test included a sulfuric acid mist test, but it was not on the drop down menu, so the results were not entered.The test for PM, sufuric acid and THC were all ran at different times on 6/12/2007. Each pollutant had it's own runs 1, 2, 3 and average in the test report. The system would not let me enter runs 1, 2, 3 and average twice. Runs 1, 2, 3 and average contain the PM data. Runs 4, 5, 6, and 7 with 7 being the average of 4, 5, and 6 for THC.Data cells left empty are due to the report not containing the data requested.For stack tests that say "voluntary", we m ean we did the test for internal use, not due to permit or regulatory requirements.The only choices from the drop down menu for the flow rate units of measure wer Facility and Fuel Information: Boiler Information: For 7097 J K Spruce Unit 2 (BLR2): J K Spruce Unit 2 is not commercially operating yet, so design parmaters are listed, but "present" operating data is not available yet. Any other questions left blank for BLR2 are because there is not data available yet.The Design and Operating Pressures listed are the throttle pressures.Unit Configurations: For JK Spruce Unit 2 (BLR2) the SCR (2SCR) was not operating yet as of 3/08/2010. JK Spruce Unit 2 is not planned to be operating commercially until m id 2010, the SCR will be operating around that tim eframe.Test Emissions Reports: The JKS Unit 1 Test Report for May 2006 included Sulfuric Acid and Fluoride, but since they were not choices on the drop menu list, the data for those runs was not entered.The JKS Unit 1 Test Report for June 2009 had a HF test with three runs and an average on 6/3/2009 and three runs with an average for metals on 6/2/2009. HF is entered as runs 1, 2, 3 and average and

Page 12Facility _Information

Facility Information:Boiler Information:The Design and Operating Pressures listed are both throttle pressures.Test Report Emissions Data: For the test in June 2007, the unit load is for both JTD1 and JTD2 combined, because they were tested at the common stack. This test included a sulfuric acid mist test, but it was not on the drop down menu, so the results were not entered.The test for PM, sufuric acid and THC were all ran at different times on 6/12/2007. Each pollutant had it's own runs 1, 2, 3 and average in the test report. The system would not let me enter runs 1, 2, 3 and average twice. Runs 1, 2, 3 and average contain the PM data. Runs 4, 5, 6, and 7 with 7 being the average of 4, 5, and 6 for THC.Data cells left empty are due to the report not containing the data requested.For stack tests that say "voluntary", we m ean we did the test for internal use, not due to permit or regulatory requirements.The only choices from the drop down menu for the flow rate units of measure wer Facility and Fuel Information: Boiler Information: For 7097 J K Spruce Unit 2 (BLR2): J K Spruce Unit 2 is not commercially operating yet, so design parmaters are listed, but "present" operating data is not available yet. Any other questions left blank for BLR2 are because there is not data available yet.The Design and Operating Pressures listed are the throttle pressures.Unit Configurations: For JK Spruce Unit 2 (BLR2) the SCR (2SCR) was not operating yet as of 3/08/2010. JK Spruce Unit 2 is not planned to be operating commercially until m id 2010, the SCR will be operating around that tim eframe.Test Emissions Reports: The JKS Unit 1 Test Report for May 2006 included Sulfuric Acid and Fluoride, but since they were not choices on the drop menu list, the data for those runs was not entered.The JKS Unit 1 Test Report for June 2009 had a HF test with three runs and an average on 6/3/2009 and three runs with an average for metals on 6/2/2009. HF is entered as runs 1, 2, 3 and average and

Page 13Facility _Information

Facility Information:Boiler Information:The Design and Operating Pressures listed are both throttle pressures.Test Report Emissions Data: For the test in June 2007, the unit load is for both JTD1 and JTD2 combined, because they were tested at the common stack. This test included a sulfuric acid mist test, but it was not on the drop down menu, so the results were not entered.The test for PM, sufuric acid and THC were all ran at different times on 6/12/2007. Each pollutant had it's own runs 1, 2, 3 and average in the test report. The system would not let me enter runs 1, 2, 3 and average twice. Runs 1, 2, 3 and average contain the PM data. Runs 4, 5, 6, and 7 with 7 being the average of 4, 5, and 6 for THC.Data cells left empty are due to the report not containing the data requested.For stack tests that say "voluntary", we m ean we did the test for internal use, not due to permit or regulatory requirements.The only choices from the drop down menu for the flow rate units of measure wer Facility and Fuel Information: Boiler Information: For 7097 J K Spruce Unit 2 (BLR2): J K Spruce Unit 2 is not commercially operating yet, so design parmaters are listed, but "present" operating data is not available yet. Any other questions left blank for BLR2 are because there is not data available yet.The Design and Operating Pressures listed are the throttle pressures.Unit Configurations: For JK Spruce Unit 2 (BLR2) the SCR (2SCR) was not operating yet as of 3/08/2010. JK Spruce Unit 2 is not planned to be operating commercially until m id 2010, the SCR will be operating around that tim eframe.Test Emissions Reports: The JKS Unit 1 Test Report for May 2006 included Sulfuric Acid and Fluoride, but since they were not choices on the drop menu list, the data for those runs was not entered.The JKS Unit 1 Test Report for June 2009 had a HF test with three runs and an average on 6/3/2009 and three runs with an average for metals on 6/2/2009. HF is entered as runs 1, 2, 3 and average and

Page 14facility _contacts

facility _id contact_id contact_title contact_name

contact_phone1

contact_phone2

contact_email

contact_primary 6181 2 Air Permit Engineer Angela Rodriguez

2103534585 adrodriguez@cpsenergy.com TRUE 7097 1 Air Permit Engineer Angela Rodriguez

2103534585 adrodriguez@cpsenergy.com TRUE

Page 15facility _coal_utilized

facility _id coal_type percentage_mass percentage_btu

synfuel_type

coal_note 6181 subbituminous 100 100 7097 subbituminous 100 100

Page 16facility _oil_utilized

facility _id oil_type percentage_volume percentage_btu

other_type

Page 17facility _other_materials

facility _id other_material

permitted_burn

actually _burn other_quantity

other_quantity

_units other_note rcra_utilize rcra_explain

Page 18facility _other_materials

rcra_explain

Page 19boiler_information

facility _id boiler_id boiler_type boiler_other bottom_design

design_fuelheat_input max_heat_input MW e_capacity 6181 1 Tangential firing Wet Bottom coal 4251 4251 450 6181 2 Tangential firing Wet Bottom coal 4251 4251 450 7097 BLR1 Tangential firing Wet Bottom coal 6361 6361 580 7097 BLR2 Tangential firing Wet Bottom coal 7261 821

Page 20boiler_information

MW e_net_capacity

design_gross_efficiency

operating_gross_efficiency

design_pressure

operating_pressure

design_temp

operating_temp

design_reheat_multiple

design_reheat_temp1 425 85.06 86.39 2400 2400 1005 1005 FALSE 1005 425 85.06 86.39 2990 2400 1005 1005 FALSE 1005 543 85.52 85.52 2400 2400 1005 1005 FALSE 1005 758 87.07 2460 1055 FALSE 1055

Page 21boiler_information

design_reheat_temp2

operating_reheat_multiple

operating_reheat_temp1

operating_reheat_temp2

hours_operated

vg_capacity

_factor applicable_NSPS

retirement_year

retirement_year_CBI FALSE 1005 7144 67.8 Subpart D 2032 FALSE FALSE 1005 7077 68.3 Subpart D 2033 FALSE FALSE 1005 7895 79 Subpart Da(1) 2047 FALSE FALSE 0 0 Subpart Da(2) 2060 FALSE

Page 22boiler_information

NOx_control

SO2_control

combustion_additives Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No

Page 23boiler_fuels

facility _id boiler_id fuel_type fuel_year percentage_massvol percentage_btu

other_type 6181 1 coal - subbituminous 2007 100 100 6181 1 coal - subbituminous 2008 100 100 6181 1 coal - subbituminous 2009 100 100 6181 2 coal - subbituminous 2007 100 100 6181 2 coal - subbituminous 2008 100 100 6181 2 coal - subbituminous 2009 100 100 7097 BLR1 coal - subbituminous 2007 100 100 7097 BLR1 coal - subbituminous 2008 100 100 7097 BLR1 coal - subbituminous 2009 100 100 7097 BLR2 coal - subbituminous 2009 100 100

Page 24boiler_control_NOx

facility _id boiler_id NOx_type NOx_other NOx_online 6181 1 Advanced Overfire Air 9/1/2002 6181 1 Low NOx Burner 4/1/2000 6181 1 Other (specify) Neural network

9/1/2004 6181 2 Advanced Overfire Air 9/1/2004 6181 2 Low NOx Burner 4/1/2001 6181 2 Other (specify) Neural Network

12/1/2004 7097 BLR1 Advanced Overfire Air 5/1/2007 7097 BLR1 Low NOx Burner 3/1/1999 7097 BLR1 Other (specify) Neural Network

4/1/2002 7097 BLR2 Advanced Overfire Air 11/1/2009 7097 BLR2 Low NOx Burner 11/1/2009

Page 25boiler_control_SO2

facility _id boiler_id SO2_type SO2_other SO2_online 6181 1 Low Sulfur Coal 1/1/1977 6181 2 Low Sulfur Coal 1/1/1978 7097 BLR1 Low Sulfur Coal 7/1/1992 7097 BLR2 Low Sulfur Coal 12/1/2009

Page 26boiler_additives

facility _id boiler_id boiler_additive additive_other

additive_online

Page 27facility _units

facility _id unit_id 6181 1 6181 2 7097 1 7097 2

Page 28unit_boilers

facility _id unit_id boiler_id 6181 1 1 6181 2 2 7097 1 BLR1 7097 2 BLR2

Page 29facility _controls

facility _id control_id control_group control_type

control_other

legacy _control cntrol_online

control_offline

NOx_reagent 6181 1BGH PM control Fabric Filter, reverse air FALSE 5/1/2007 6181 2BGH PM control Fabric Filter, reverse air FALSE 4/1/2006 7097 2SCR NOx control Selective Cataly

tic Reduction FALSE Am monia 7097 BGH1 PM control Fabric Filter, reverse air FALSE 7/1/1992 7097 BGH2 PM control Fabric Filter, reverse air FALSE 12/1/2009 7097 FGD1 SO2 control Spray type FALSE 12/1/1992 7097 FGD2 SO2 control Spray type FALSE 12/1/2009

Page 30facility _controls

reagent_other

NOx_ammonia

SO2_sorbent

oher_sorbent

SO2_scrubber_additive

19

Lim estone no Lim estone no

Page 31facility _sampling_ports

facility _id sampling_port_id 6181 Outlet Duct1 6181 Outlet Duct2 6181 SP1 7097 SP1 7097 SP2

Page 32facility _stacks

facility _id stack_id stack_height stack_diameter

sack_gas_velocity 6181 1-2 700 26 101.8 7097 STK1 525 26 60 7097 STK2 602 29 62.5

Page 33configurations

facility _id configuration_id 6181 1 6181 2 7097 1 7097 2

Page 34configuration_components

facility _id configuration_id

component_id

order component_type port_near 6181 1 1 1 Unit 6181 1 1-2 5 Stack 6181 1 1BGH 2 PM control 6181 1 Outlet Duct1 3 Sam pling Port 6181 1 SP1 4 Sam pling Port 6181 2 1-2 5 Stack 6181 2 2 1 Unit 6181 2 2BGH 2 PM control 6181 2 Outlet Duct2 3 Sam pling Port 6181 2 SP1 4 Sam pling Port 7097 1 1 1 Unit 7097 1 BGH1 2 PM control 7097 1 FGD1 3 SO2 control 7097 1 SP1 4 Sam pling Port 7097 1 STK1 5 Stack 7097 2 2 1 Unit 7097 2 2SCR 2 NOx control 7097 2 BGH2 3 PM control 7097 2 FGD2 4 SO2 control 7097 2 SP2 5 Sam pling Port 7097 2 STK2 6 Stack

Page 35configuration_pollutants1

facility _id configuration_id

pollutant_nam e

permit_type_1

em lim it_1 em lim it_units_1 avg_period_1

em lim it_2 em lim it_units_2 7097 1 PM (Filterable) State - State Operating Permit

0.03 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu)

1 hour 167 pound per hour (lb/hr) 7097 1 Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) State - State Operating Permit

0.35 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu)

30 days 0.6 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) 7097 1 Hydrogen Fluoride (HF) State - State Operating Permit

0.8 pound per hour (lb/hr)

1 hour 7097 1 Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) State - State Operating Permit

0.3 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu)

30 days 2783 pound per hour (lb/hr) 7097 1 Beryllium(Be) State - State Operating Permit

0.04 pound per hour (lb/hr)

1 hour 7097 1 Lead (Pb) State - State Operating Permit 0.07 pound per hour (lb/hr)

1 hour 7097 1 Total Mercury (Hgt) State - State Operating Permit

1.15 pound per hour (lb/hr)

1 hour 7097 1 Carbon Monoxide (CO) State - State Operating Permit

1670 pound per hour (lb/hr)

30 days 7097 2 PM10 (Filterable) State - State Operating Permit

0.015 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) 0.022 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) 7097 2 Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) State - State Operating Permit

0.069 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu)

30 days 0.05 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) 7097 2 Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) State - State Operating Permit

0.1 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu)

30 days 0.06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) 7097 2 Hydrogen Chloride (HCl) State - State Operating Permit

0.0019 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) 480 pound per hour (lb/hr) 7097 2 Hydrogen Fluoride (HF) State - State Operating Permit

0.0008 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) 60 pound per hour (lb/hr) 7097 2 Lead (Pb) State - State Operating Permit 8.4E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) 0.2 pound per hour (lb/hr) 7097 2 Total Mercury (Hgt) State - State Operating Permit

0.02 pound per Gigawatt hour (lb/GW h) 0.43 pound per hour (lb/hr) 7097 2 Carbon Monoxide (CO) State - State Operating Permit

0.15 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) 4480 pound per hour (lb/hr) 6181 1 PM (Filterable) State - State Operating Permit

425 pound per hour (lb/hr)

1 hour 6181 1 Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) State - State Operating Permit

0.7 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu)

3 hours 1913 pound per hour (lb/hr) 6181 1 Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) State - State Operating Permit

1.2 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu)

30 days 5102 pound per hour (lb/hr) 6181 1 Carbon Monoxide (CO) State - State Operating Permit

2831 pound per hour (lb/hr)

1 hour 6181 2 PM (Filterable) State - State Operating Permit

425 pound per hour (lb/hr)

1 hour 6181 2 Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) State - State Operating Permit

0.7 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu)

3 hours 1913 pound per hour (lb/hr) 6181 2 Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) State - State Operating Permit

1.2 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu)

30 days 5102 pound per hour (lb/hr) 6181 2 Carbon Monoxide (CO) State - State Operating Permit

2831 pound per hour (lb/hr)

1 hour

Page 36configuration_pollutants1

avg_period_2

em lim it_details

test_method

em rate em rate_units guarantee_level

_explain

req_monitoring

eq_recordkeeping 1 hour EPA Ref Method 5 front half only stack test to get emission factor and track on 12 month rolling basis keep records 5 years on site 3 hours For SO2, there was a scrubber upgrade in Feb. 2009 and the guarantee was 93% removal, but that varies as a lb/mmbtu rate depending on the % Sulfur in the coal CEMS keep records 5 years on site stack test to get emission factor and track on 12 month rolling basis

keep records 5 year on site 1 hour 0.12 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) No SOFA system guarantee CEMS keep records 5 years on site stack test to get an emissin factor and track on 12 month rolling basis

keep records 5 years on site stack test to get emission factor and track on 12 month rolling basis

keep records 5 years on site stack test to get emission factor and track on 12 month rolling basis

keep records 5 years on site CEMS keep records 5 years on site pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) averaging period is annual for both limits. The notes in the permit say the 0.015 lim it is for front half only and the 0.022 lim it is for front and back half EPA Ref Method 5 please see notes stack test to get an emission factor and track total on a 12 month rolling basis

keep records on site for 5 years pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) the 0.05 lim it has an averaging period of 12 month rolling CEMS keep records on site for 5 years pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) the 0.06 lom it has an averaging period of 12 month rolling CEMS keep records on site for 5 years 1 hour the 0.0019 lim it has an averaging period of annual stack test to get an emission factor and track total on a 12 month rolling basis keep records on site for 5 years 1 hour the 0.0008 lim it has an averagin period of annual stack test to get an emission factor and track total on a 12 month rolling basis keep records on site for 5 years 1 hour the 8.4E-06 lim it has an averaging period of annual stack test to get an emission factor and track total on a 12 month rolling basis keep records on site for 5 years 1 hour the 0.02 lim it has an averaging period of annual CEMS keep records on site for 5 years 1 hour the 0.15 lim it has an averaging period of 12 month rolling CEMS keep records on site for 5 years Method 5/202 0.015 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) No Baghouse emission guarantee. The ESPs were taken out of service and baghouses were installed. stack test for emission factor and track on a 12 month rolling basis

keep records on site 5 years 1 hour 0.15 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) No SOFA system guarantee CEMS keep records on site 5 years 1 hour CEMS keep records on site 5 years stack test for emission factor and track on a 12 month rolling basis

keep records on site 5 years Method 5/202 0.015 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) No Baghouse emission guarantee. The ESPs were taken out of service and baghouse was installed. stack test for an emission factor and track on a 12 month rolling basis

keep records on site 5 years 1 hour 0.15 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) No SOFA system guarantee CEMS keep records on site 5 years 1 hour CEMS keep records on site 5 years stack test for an emission factor and track on a 12 month rolling basis

keep records on site 5 years

Page 37configuration_pollutants1

req_reporting reported in annual emissions inventory (EIQ) Emissions Inventory Questionaire to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality reported in annual emissions inventory (EIQ) Emissions Inventory Questionaire to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality and the Quarterly

reports to the EPA reported in annual emissions inventory (EIQ) Emissions Inventory Questionaire to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality reported in annual emissions inventory (EIQ) Emissions Inventory Questionaire to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality and in the Quarterly

reports to the EPA reported in annual emissions inventory (EIQ) Emissions Inventory Questionaire to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality reported in annual emissions inventory (EIQ) Emissions Inventory Questionaire to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality reported in annual emissions inventory (EIQ) Emissions Inventory Questionaire to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality reported in annual emissions inventory (EIQ) Emissions Inventory Questionaire to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality and Quarterly

to EPA annual total is submitted in the Emissions Inventory Questionaire (EIQ) to the TCEQ each year annual total is submitted in the Emissions Inventory Questionaire (EIQ) to the TCEQ each year and Quarterly to the EPA annual total is submitted in the Emissions Inventory Questionaire (EIQ) to the TCEQ each year and quarterly to the EPA annual total is submitted in the Emissions Inventory Questionaire (EIQ) to the TCEQ each year annual total is submitted in the Emissions Inventory Questionaire (EIQ) to the TCEQ each year annual total is submitted in the Emissions Inventory Questionaire (EIQ) to the TCEQ each year annual total is submitted in the Emissions Inventory Questionaire (EIQ) to the TCEQ each year annual total is submitted in the Emissions Inventory Questionaire (EIQ) to the TCEQ each year and quarterly to the EPA The annual total is reported to the TCEQ in the Emissions Inventory Questionare (EIQ) The annual total is reported to the TCEQ in the Emissions Inventory Questionare (EIQ) and quarterly to the EPA The annual total is reported to the TCEQ in the Emissions Inventory Questionare (EIQ) and quarterly to the EPA The annual total is reported to the TCEQ in the Emissions Inventory Questionare (EIQ) reported annualy

to the TCEQ in the Emissions Inventory Questionare (EIQ) reported annualy

to the TCEQ in the Emissions Inventory Questionare (EIQ) and quarterly to the EPA reported annualy

to the TCEQ in the Emissions Inventory Questionare (EIQ) and quarterly to the EPA reported annualy

to the TCEQ in the Emissions Inventory Questionare (EIQ)

Page 38configuration_pollutants1

reported in annual emissions inventory (EIQ) Emissions Inventory Questionaire to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality reported in annual emissions inventory (EIQ) Emissions Inventory Questionaire to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality and the Quarterly

reports to the EPA reported in annual emissions inventory (EIQ) Emissions Inventory Questionaire to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality reported in annual emissions inventory (EIQ) Emissions Inventory Questionaire to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality and in the Quarterly

reports to the EPA reported in annual emissions inventory (EIQ) Emissions Inventory Questionaire to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality reported in annual emissions inventory (EIQ) Emissions Inventory Questionaire to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality reported in annual emissions inventory (EIQ) Emissions Inventory Questionaire to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality reported in annual emissions inventory (EIQ) Emissions Inventory Questionaire to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality and Quarterly

to EPA

annual total is submitted in the Emissions Inventory Questionaire (EIQ) to the TCEQ each year and Quarterly to the EPA annual total is submitted in the Emissions Inventory Questionaire (EIQ) to the TCEQ each year and quarterly to the EPA

annual total is submitted in the Emissions Inventory Questionaire (EIQ) to the TCEQ each year and quarterly to the EPA

The annual total is reported to the TCEQ in the Emissions Inventory Questionare (EIQ) and quarterly to the EPA The annual total is reported to the TCEQ in the Emissions Inventory Questionare (EIQ) and quarterly to the EPA

Page 39control_technologies

facility _id configuration_id

component_id

control_id project_titleproject_type vendor_name

vndor_contact

vendor_phone

Page 40control_technologies

vendor_address

vndor_city

vendor_state

vendor_zip actual_start_date projected_start_date

end_date sorbent chemical_additive

Page 41control_technologies

injection_point

HAP_em ission_reduction

HAP_em ission_rate

HAP_em ission_rate_units

HAP_achieved_reduction

HAP_achieved_rate

HAP_achieved_rate_units

feed_rate feed_rate_units

Page 42control_technologies

feed_rate_units

Page 43control_coal_ranks

facility _id configuration_id

component_id

control_id coal_type

Page 44control_pollutants1

facility _id configuration_id

component_id

control_id pollutant_nam e

Page 45control_costs

facility _id configuration_id

component_id

control_id boiler_retrofit boiler_new_install

total_capital_investm ent

total_operating_costs

base_year

Page 46control_costs

CBI

Page 47misc_controls

facility _id misc_control_id

control_description

Page 48misc_control_configurations

facility _id misc_control_id

configuration_id

Page 49fuel_shipments

facility _id shipment_id

shipment_date

am ount_received

am ount_units

fuel_type state_country other_country

county 6181 1 1/1/2009 245447 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 6181 10 4/1/2009 164285 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 6181 11 4/1/2009 229004 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 6181 12 4/1/2009 65909 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 6181 13 5/1/2009 180726 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 6181 14 5/1/2009 229459 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 6181 15 5/1/2009 81576 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 6181 16 6/1/2009 295111 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 6181 17 6/1/2009 114504 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 6181 18 6/1/2009 81794 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 6181 19 7/1/2009 376270 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 6181 2 1/1/2009 16445 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 6181 20 7/1/2009 48951 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 6181 21 7/1/2009 82342 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 6181 22 8/1/2009 164366 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 6181 23 8/1/2009 131011 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 6181 24 8/1/2009 65761 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 6181 25 9/1/2009 82249 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 6181 26 9/1/2009 229040 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 6181 27 9/1/2009 65753 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 6181 28 10/1/2009 147246 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 6181 29 10/1/2009 180316 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 6181 3 1/1/2009 32736 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 6181 30 10/1/2009 65225 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 6181 31 11/1/2009 114955 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 6181 32 11/1/2009 196631 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 6181 33 11/1/2009 65552 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 6181 34 12/1/2009 261680 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 6181 35 12/1/2009 130664 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 6181 36 12/1/2009 65337 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 6181 4 2/1/2009 114429 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 6181 5 2/1/2009 98147 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 6181 6 2/1/2009 32696 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 6181 7 3/1/2009 49224 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 6181 8 3/1/2009 213405 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 6181 9 3/1/2009 48871 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell

Page 50fuel_shipments

coal_seam shipment_method Wyodak Unit Train Wyodak Unit Train Wyodak Unit Train Wyodak Unit Train Wyodak Unit Train Wyodak Unit Train Wyodak Unit Train Wyodak Unit Train Wyodak Unit Train Wyodak Unit Train Wyodak Unit Train Wyodak Unit Train Wyodak Unit Train Wyodak Unit Train Wyodak Unit Train Wyodak Unit Train Wyodak Unit Train Wyodak Unit Train Wyodak Unit Train Wyodak Unit Train Wyodak Unit Train Wyodak Unit Train Wyodak Unit Train Wyodak Unit Train Wyodak Unit Train Wyodak Unit Train Wyodak Unit Train Wyodak Unit Train Wyodak Unit Train Wyodak Unit Train Wyodak Unit Train Wyodak Unit Train Wyodak Unit Train Wyodak Unit Train Wyodak Unit Train Wyodak Unit Train

Page 51fuel_shipment_configurations

facility _id shipment_id

configuration_id 6181 1 1 6181 1 2 6181 10 1 6181 10 2 6181 11 1 6181 11 2 6181 12 1 6181 12 2 6181 13 1 6181 13 2 6181 14 1 6181 14 2 6181 15 1 6181 15 2 6181 16 1 6181 16 2 6181 17 1 6181 17 2 6181 18 1 6181 18 2 6181 19 1 6181 19 2 6181 2 1 6181 2 2 6181 20 1 6181 20 2 6181 21 1 6181 21 2 6181 22 1 6181 22 2 6181 23 1 6181 23 2 6181 24 1 6181 24 2 6181 25 1 6181 25 2 6181 26 1 6181 26 2 6181 27 1 6181 27 2 6181 28 1 6181 28 2 6181 29 1 6181 29 2 6181 3 1 6181 3 2 6181 30 1 6181 30 2 6181 31 1 6181 31 2 6181 32 1

Page 52fuel_shipment_configurations

6181 32 2 6181 33 1 6181 33 2 6181 34 1 6181 34 2 6181 35 1 6181 35 2 6181 36 1 6181 36 2 6181 4 1 6181 4 2 6181 5 1 6181 5 2 6181 6 1 6181 6 2 6181 7 1 6181 7 2 6181 8 1 6181 8 2 6181 9 1 6181 9 2

Page 53fuel_shipment_samples

facility _id shipment_id

sample_id am ount_fuel am ount_fuel_units

total_sulfur ash_content heating_value

hating_units 6181 1 Aug2009 0.42 7.77 6181 1 Oct2009 0.46 8.72

Page 54fuel_shipment_samples

chlorine chlorine_units fluorine fluorine_units data_provided

data_other_specified

supplier_type

supplier_name

supplier_address standard operational procedures Other standard operational procedures Other

Page 55fuel_shipment_samples

supplier_city

supplier_state

supplier_zip

lab_nam e lab_address lab_city lab_state lab_zip analysis_copies Standard Laboratories Casper WY Yes Standard LaborratoriesCasper WY Yes

Page 56fuel_shipment_samples

analysis_copies

Page 57fuel_sample_pollutants

facility _id shipment_id

sample_id fuel_pollutant pollutant_conc

pollutant_conc_units

pollutant_conc_ND

pollutant_conc_MDL 6181 1 Aug2009 Mercury (Hg) 0.181 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 6181 1 Oct2009 Mercury (Hg) 0.076 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE

Page 58test_reports

facility _id report_id report_type other_type report_description report_begin_date

report_end_date

before_control

during_deviation 6181 JTD Mercury

Em ission Test Sept 2007 other voluntary A stack test was conducted on JTD Units 1 & 2 common stack in Sept 2007 to speciate the mercury emissions. 9/18/2007 9/19/2007 No No 6181 JTD Mercury

Em issions Test Nov 2007 other voluntary To evaluate mercury emissions from our Calaveras Power Station, a stack test was performed on both JTD 1 & 2 common stack and JKS 1 in November 2007. ######## ######## No No 6181 JTD Mercury

Speciation Nov 2007 Test other voluntary Mercury Speciation on JTD Units 1 & 2 Common Stack via Flue Gas Adsorbent Mercury Speciation (FAMS) and Method EPA 324 ######## ######## No No 6181 JTD Unit 1 June 2005 Test

other voluntary

test Test was performed for NOx and CO on the outlet duct of JTD Unit 1 on June 10, 2005.

6/10/2005 6/10/2005 No No 6181 JTD Unit 2 June 2005 Test

other voluntary JTD Unit 2 Outlet Duct NOx and CO emission test on June 13, 2005. 6/13/2005 6/13/2005 No No 6181 JTD Unit 2 November 2006 Test

other voluntary

stack test for Hg On November 16, 2006, a stack test to determine the Mercury concentration using 40 CFR Part 75, Appendix K on JTD Unit 2 baghouse outlet duct. ######## ######## No No 6181 JTD Units 1 & 2 June 2007 Test

other test after baghouse installation After removing the ESPs from service and installing baghouses at JTD Units 1 & 2, a test for PM, Sulfuric Acid and THC was performed in June 2007. JTD Units 1 & 2 have a common stack, and this test was performed while both units were operating.

6/12/2007 6/13/2007 No No 7097 JKS Mercury

Em ission Test Nov 2007 other voluntary To evaluate Mercury emissions a stack test was performed on JKS1 in November 2007. ######## ######## No No 7097 JKS Mercury

Speciation Nov 2007 other voluntary Mercury Speciation via Flue Gas Mercury Speciation (FAMS) Method and Method EPA 324 ######## ######## No No 7097 JKS Unit 1 Test Report June 2008

other voluntary Test for PM on JKS Unit 1 in June 2008. 6/25/2008 6/25/2008 No No 7097 JKS Unit 1 Test Report June 2009

other voluntary JKS Unit 1 had a scrubber upgrade in Feb 2009. This stack test in June 2009 provided new emission factors after the upgrade. 6/2/2009 6/3/2009 No No 7097 JKS Unit 1 Test Report May 2006 other voluntary

test Test on JKS Unit 1 on May 2 & 4, 2006, to evaluate PM, Fluoride, and Sulfuric Acid. 5/2/2006 5/4/2006 No No

Page 59test_reports

deviation_reports No No No No No No No No No No No No

Page 60test_report_configurations

facility _id report_id configuration_id 6181 JTD Mercury

Em ission Test Sept 2007 1 6181 JTD Mercury

Em ission Test Sept 2007 2 6181 JTD Mercury

Em issions Test Nov 2007 1 6181 JTD Mercury

Em issions Test Nov 2007 2 6181 JTD Mercury

Speciation Nov 2007 Test 1 6181 JTD Mercury

Speciation Nov 2007 Test 2 6181 JTD Unit 1 June 2005 Test

1 6181 JTD Unit 2 June 2005 Test

2 6181 JTD Unit 2 November 2006 Test

2 6181 JTD Units 1 & 2 June 2007 Test

1 6181 JTD Units 1 & 2 June 2007 Test

2 7097 JKS Mercury

Em ission Test Nov 2007 1 7097 JKS Mercury

Speciation Nov 2007 1 7097 JKS Unit 1 Test Report June 2008

1 7097 JKS Unit 1 Test Report June 2009

1 7097 JKS Unit 1 Test Report May 2006 1

Page 61test_report_fuels

facility _id report_id fuel_id 6181 JTD Mercury

Em ission Test Sept 2007 subbituminous 6181 JTD Mercury

Em issions Test Nov 2007 subbituminous 6181 JTD Mercury

Speciation Nov 2007 Test Subbitum inous 6181 JTD Unit 1 June 2005 Test

subbituminous 6181 JTD Unit 2 June 2005 Test

subbituminous 6181 JTD Unit 2 November 2006 Test

subbituminous 6181 JTD Units 1 & 2 June 2007 Test

subbituminous 7097 JKS Mercury

Em ission Test Nov 2007 subbituminous 7097 JKS Mercury

Speciation Nov 2007 subbituminous 7097 JKS Unit 1 Test Report June 2008

subbituminous 7097 JKS Unit 1 Test Report June 2009

subbituminous 7097 JKS Unit 1 Test Report May 2006 subbituminous

Page 62test_report_fuel_types

facility _id report_id fuel_id fuel_type percentage_massvol percentage_btu

other_type 6181 JTD Mercury

Em ission Test Sept 2007 subbituminous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 6181 JTD Mercury

Em issions Test Nov 2007 subbituminous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 6181 JTD Mercury

Speciation Nov 2007 Test Subbitum inous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 6181 JTD Unit 1 June 2005 Test

subbituminous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 6181 JTD Unit 2 June 2005 Test

subbituminous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 6181 JTD Unit 2 November 2006 Test

subbituminous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 6181 JTD Units 1 & 2 June 2007 Test

subbituminous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 7097 JKS Mercury

Em ission Test Nov 2007 subbituminous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 7097 JKS Mercury

Speciation Nov 2007 subbituminous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 7097 JKS Unit 1 Test Report June 2008

subbituminous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 7097 JKS Unit 1 Test Report June 2009

subbituminous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 7097 JKS Unit 1 Test Report May 2006 subbituminous

coal - subbituminous

100 100

Page 63cem_data

facility _id tim e_period

cem_period_description 6181 12/30/2008 thru present

The JTD Hg CEMS were installed in Oct 2008. The CEMS have been operating since 12/30/2008 and were certified on 8/27/2009. Data for 12/30/2008 thru 3/2/2010 will be submitted electronically

. 7097 12/30/2008 thru present

The Hg CEMS for J K Spruce Unit 1 was installed in Oct 2008 and started up on 12/30/008. The Hg CEMS was certified on 8/26/2009. The hourly data from the J K Spruce Unit 1 Hg CEMS will be submitted with the ICR for the time period 12/30/2008 - 3/1/2010.

Page 64cem_data

The JTD Hg CEMS were installed in Oct 2008. The CEMS have been operating since 12/30/2008 and were certified on 8/27/2009. Data for 12/30/2008 thru 3/2/2010 will be submitted electronically

. The Hg CEMS for J K Spruce Unit 1 was installed in Oct 2008 and started up on 12/30/008. The Hg CEMS was certified on 8/26/2009. The hourly data from the J K Spruce Unit 1 Hg CEMS will be submitted with the ICR for the time period 12/30/2008 - 3/1/2010.

Page 65cem_data

The JTD Hg CEMS were installed in Oct 2008. The CEMS have been operating since 12/30/2008 and were certified on 8/27/2009. Data for 12/30/2008 thru 3/2/2010 will be submitted electronically

. The Hg CEMS for J K Spruce Unit 1 was installed in Oct 2008 and started up on 12/30/008. The Hg CEMS was certified on 8/26/2009. The hourly data from the J K Spruce Unit 1 Hg CEMS will be submitted with the ICR for the time period 12/30/2008 - 3/1/2010.

Page 66cem_data_pollutants1

facility _id tim e_period

pollutant_nam e 7097 12/30/2008 thru present

Oxidized Mercury

(Hg++) 7097 12/30/2008 thru present

Elem ental Mercury

(Hg0) 7097 12/30/2008 thru present

Total Mercury

(Hgt) 6181 12/30/2008 thru present

Oxidized Mercury

(Hg++) 6181 12/30/2008 thru present

Elem ental Mercury

(Hg0) 6181 12/30/2008 thru present

Total Mercury

(Hgt)

Page 67test_report_sampling

facility _id report_id sampling_port_id point_differ point_description befre_SO2_device

point_orientation

normal_bypass_percent

testing_bypass_percent 6181 JTD Mercury

Em ission Test Sept 2007 SP1 No No 6181 JTD Mercury

Em issions Test Nov 2007 SP1 No No 6181 JTD Mercury

Speciation Nov 2007 Test SP1 No No 6181 JTD Unit 1 June 2005 Test

Outlet Duct1

Yes This test was performed at the Unit 1 outlet duct, instead of at the stack, so that it is not representative of both unit's emissions at the common stack, but instead just representative of Unit 1. The duct is after the baghouse, but before the stack. No 6181 JTD Unit 2 June 2005 Test

Outlet Duct2

Yes This test was performed at the JTD Unit 2 Outlet Duct, before the common stack that it shares with JTD Unit 1. The duct is located after the baghouse, but before the stack. No 6181 JTD Unit 2 November 2006 Test

Outlet Duct2

Yes This test was at the baghouse outlet duct for JTD2. The duct is after the baghouse, but before the common stack, so it is just representative of JTD2's emissions not the combined emissions of JTD 1 & 2. No 6181 JTD Units 1 & 2 June 2007 Test

SP1 No No 7097 JKS Mercury

Em ission Test Nov 2007 SP1 No No 7097 JKS Mercury

Speciation Nov 2007 SP1 No No 7097 JKS Unit 1 Test Report June 2008

SP1 No No 7097 JKS Unit 1 Test Report June 2009

SP1 No No 7097 JKS Unit 1 Test Report May 2006 SP1 No No

Page 68test_report_sampling

fg_fraction

Page 69sampling_runs

facility _id report_id sampling_port_id run_id start_datetime end_datetim e

unit_load net_generation fg_moisture_content 6181 JTD Mercury

Em ission Test Sept 2007 SP1 1 9/19/2007 9/19/2007 768 13.41 6181 JTD Mercury

Em ission Test Sept 2007 SP1 2 9/19/2007 9/19/2007 768 12.82 6181 JTD Mercury

Em ission Test Sept 2007 SP1 3 9/19/2007 9/19/2007 768 13.28 6181 JTD Mercury

Em ission Test Sept 2007 SP1 average 9/19/2007 9/19/2007 768 13.41 6181 JTD Mercury

Em issions Test Nov 2007 SP1 1 ######## ######## 6181 JTD Mercury

Em issions Test Nov 2007 SP1 2 ######## ######## 6181 JTD Mercury

Em issions Test Nov 2007 SP1 3 ######## ######## 6181 JTD Mercury

Em issions Test Nov 2007 SP1 average ######## ######## 6181 JTD Mercury

Speciation Nov 2007 Test SP1 1 ######## ######## 6181 JTD Mercury

Speciation Nov 2007 Test SP1 2 ######## ######## 6181 JTD Mercury

Speciation Nov 2007 Test SP1 3 ######## ######## 6181 JTD Mercury

Speciation Nov 2007 Test SP1 4 ######## ######## 6181 JTD Unit 1 June 2005 Test

Outlet Duct1

1 6/10/2005 6/10/2005 391.35 6181 JTD Unit 1 June 2005 Test

Outlet Duct1

2 6/10/2005 6/10/2005 389.86 6181 JTD Unit 1 June 2005 Test

Outlet Duct1

3 6/10/2005 6/10/2005 389.7 6181 JTD Unit 1 June 2005 Test

Outlet Duct1

average 6/10/2005 6/10/2005 390 6181 JTD Unit 2 June 2005 Test

Outlet Duct2

1 6/13/2005 6/13/2005 411.5 11 6181 JTD Unit 2 June 2005 Test

Outlet Duct2

2 6/13/2005 6/13/2005 411.6 12 6181 JTD Unit 2 June 2005 Test

Outlet Duct2

3 6/13/2005 6/13/2005 411.4 12 6181 JTD Unit 2 June 2005 Test

Outlet Duct2

average 6/13/2005 6/13/2005 411 12 6181 JTD Unit 2 November 2006 Test

Outlet Duct2

1 ######## ######## 11 6181 JTD Unit 2 November 2006 Test

Outlet Duct2

2 ######## ######## 11 6181 JTD Unit 2 November 2006 Test

Outlet Duct2

average ######## ######## 11 6181 JTD Units 1 & 2 June 2007 Test

SP1 1 6/12/2007 6/12/2007 816.9 13 6181 JTD Units 1 & 2 June 2007 Test

SP1 2 6/12/2007 6/12/2007 816.1 13 6181 JTD Units 1 & 2 June 2007 Test

SP1 3 6/12/2007 6/12/2007 816.7 12 6181 JTD Units 1 & 2 June 2007 Test

SP1 4 6/12/2007 6/12/2007 816.1 13 6181 JTD Units 1 & 2 June 2007 Test

SP1 5 6/12/2007 6/12/2007 816 13 6181 JTD Units 1 & 2 June 2007 Test

SP1 6 6/12/2007 6/12/2007 816 13 6181 JTD Units 1 & 2 June 2007 Test

SP1 7 6/12/2007 6/12/2007 816.2 13 6181 JTD Units 1 & 2 June 2007 Test

SP1 average 6/12/2007 6/12/2007 816.5 13 7097 JKS Mercury

Em ission Test Nov 2007 SP1 1 ######## ######## 7097 JKS Mercury

Em ission Test Nov 2007 SP1 2 ######## ######## 7097 JKS Mercury

Em ission Test Nov 2007 SP1 3 ######## ######## 7097 JKS Mercury

Em ission Test Nov 2007 SP1 4 ######## ######## 7097 JKS Mercury

Em ission Test Nov 2007 SP1 average ######## ######## 7097 JKS Mercury

Speciation Nov 2007 SP1 1 ######## ######## 7097 JKS Mercury

Speciation Nov 2007 SP1 2 ######## ######## 7097 JKS Mercury

Speciation Nov 2007 SP1 3 ######## ######## 7097 JKS Mercury

Speciation Nov 2007 SP1 4 ######## ######## 7097 JKS Unit 1 Test Report June 2008

SP1 1 6/25/2008 6/25/2008 577 19 7097 JKS Unit 1 Test Report June 2008

SP1 2 6/25/2008 6/25/2008 576 18 7097 JKS Unit 1 Test Report June 2008

SP1 3 6/25/2008 6/25/2008 577 19 7097 JKS Unit 1 Test Report June 2008

SP1 average 6/25/2008 6/25/2008 577 19 7097 JKS Unit 1 Test Report June 2009

SP1 1 6/3/2009 6/3/2009 576.3 18 7097 JKS Unit 1 Test Report June 2009

SP1 2 6/3/2009 6/3/2009 581.1 18 7097 JKS Unit 1 Test Report June 2009

SP1 3 6/3/2009 6/3/2009 585.3 19 7097 JKS Unit 1 Test Report June 2009

SP1 4 6/2/2009 6/2/2009 579 19 7097 JKS Unit 1 Test Report June 2009

SP1 5 6/2/2009 6/2/2009 579 20 7097 JKS Unit 1 Test Report June 2009

SP1 6 6/2/2009 6/2/2009 578 19 7097 JKS Unit 1 Test Report June 2009

SP1 7 6/2/2009 6/2/2009 579 19

Page 70sampling_runs

7097 JKS Unit 1 Test Report June 2009

SP1 average 6/3/2009 6/3/2009 581 18 7097 JKS Unit 1 Test Report May 2006 SP1 2 5/2/2006 5/2/2006 585 12 7097 JKS Unit 1 Test Report May 2006 SP1 3 5/2/2006 5/2/2006 592 16 7097 JKS Unit 1 Test Report May 2006 SP1 4 5/2/2006 5/2/2006 586 16 7097 JKS Unit 1 Test Report May 2006 SP1 average 5/2/2006 5/2/2006 588 14

Page 71sampling_runs

fg_flow_rate

fg_flow_rate_units

standard_temperature

standard_pressure

normal_temperature

normal_pressure

fg_oxygen_content

fg_CO2_content

fg_temperature 7 12 6.8 11.7 6.6 12 7 12

6.1 13.5 5.9 13.6 5.9 13.7 6 13.6 5.4 14.2 5.4 13.9 5.5 14.2 5.4 14 1050000 288 1050000 288 1050000 288 1940000 dscfm 0.9829 5.9 13.3 1920000 dscfm 0.9829 5.3 13.9 1940000 dscfm 0.9829 6.2 13 1930000 dscfm 5.8 1930000 dscfm 5.8 1930000 dscfm 5.8 1930000 dscfm 5.8 1930000 dscfm 0.9829 5.8 13.4

1280000 dscfm 5.6 12.8 171 1320000 dscfm 5.3 13 173 1300000 dscfm 5.5 13.2 173 1300000 dscfm 5.5 13 172 1260000 dscfm 5.7 13.8 135 1250000 dscfm 5.1 14.4 137 1250000 dscfm 5.1 14.2 137 1210000 dscfm 5.2 14 147 1220000 dscfm 4.9 14.3 149 1220000 dscfm 4.9 14.3 142 1220000 dscfm 5 14.2 146

Page 72sampling_runs

1250000 dscfm 5.3 14.1 136 1490000 dscfm 4.9 13.9 161.7 1410000 dscfm 4.9 13.9 163 1400000 dscfm 5 13.9 161 1430000 dscfm 4.9 13.9 162

Page 73sampling_runs

fg_pressure

Hg_loi test_method run_comments

fuel_id fuel_unit_load fuel_flow_rate

fuel_ash fuel_heating_value Ontario Hydro Method (ASTM D-6784-02) Ontario Hydro Method Ontario Hydro Method Ontario Hydro Method Appendix K Appendix K Appendix K Appendix K EPA 324 EPA 324 FAMS (Flue Gas Adsorbent Mercury Speciation) FAMS Method 7E for NOx and Method 10 for CO. Method 7E for NOx and Method 10 for CO. Method 7E for NOx an Method 10 for CO. Method 7E for Nox and Method 10 for CO. Method 7 E for Nitrogen Oxides and Method 10 for Carbon Monoxide Method 7 E for Nitrogen Oxides and Method 10 for Carbon Monoxide Method 7 E for Nitrogen Oxides and Method 10 for Carbon Monoxide Method 7 E for Nitrogen Oxides and Method 10 for Carbon Monoxide Appendix K Appendix K Appendix K Method 5/202 for PM, Method 8A for Sulfuric Acid, and Method 25A for Total Hydrocarbon Method 5/202 for PM, Method 8A for Sulfuric Acid, and Method 25A for Total Hydrocarbon Method 5/202 for PM, Method 8A for Sulfuric Acid, and Method 25A for Total Hydrocarbon Method 25A Method 25A Method 25A Method 25A Method 5/202 for PM, Method 8A for Sulfuric Acid, and Method 25A for Total Hydrocarbon 40 CFR Part 75, Appendix K 40 CFR Part 75, Appendix K 40 CFR Part 75, Appendix K 40 CFR Part 75, Appendix K 40 CFR Part 75, Appendix K EPA 324 EPA 324 FAMS FAMS Method 17 for PM Method 17 for PM Method 17 for PM Method 17 for PM HF tested with Method 26A and Metals tested with Method 29 HF tested with Method 26A and Metals tested with Method 29 HF tested with Method 26A and Metals tested with Method 29 Method 29 for Metals Method 29 for Metals Method 29 for Metals Method 29 for Metals

Page 74sampling_runs

HF tested with Method 26A and Metals tested with Method 29 Method 5/202 for PM, Method 8A for Sulfuric Acid Mist, and Method 13B for Fluoride Method 5/202 for PM, Method 8A for Sulfuric Acid Mist, and Method 13B for Fluoride Method 5/202 for PM, Method 8A for Sulfuric Acid Mist, and Method 13B for Fluoride Method 5/202 for PM, Method 8A for Sulfuric Acid Mist, and Method 13B for Fluoride

Page 75sampling_runs

fuel_sulfur

Method 5/202 for PM, Method 8A for Sulfuric Acid, and Method 25A for Total Hydrocarbon Method 5/202 for PM, Method 8A for Sulfuric Acid, and Method 25A for Total Hydrocarbon Method 5/202 for PM, Method 8A for Sulfuric Acid, and Method 25A for Total Hydrocarbon

Method 5/202 for PM, Method 8A for Sulfuric Acid, and Method 25A for Total Hydrocarbon

Page 76sampling_runs

Method 5/202 for PM, Method 8A for Sulfuric Acid Mist, and Method 13B for Fluoride Method 5/202 for PM, Method 8A for Sulfuric Acid Mist, and Method 13B for Fluoride Method 5/202 for PM, Method 8A for Sulfuric Acid Mist, and Method 13B for Fluoride Method 5/202 for PM, Method 8A for Sulfuric Acid Mist, and Method 13B for Fluoride

Page 77sampling_run_pollutants1

facility _id report_id sampling_port_id run_id pollutant_nam e conc conc_units conc_ND conc_MDL 6181 JTD Unit 2 November 2006 Test

Outlet Duct2

1 Total Mercury (Hgt) 4.8 microgram per dry

standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6181 JTD Unit 2 November 2006 Test

Outlet Duct2

2 Total Mercury (Hgt) 6.1 microgram per dry

standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6181 JTD Unit 2 November 2006 Test

Outlet Duct2

average Total Mercury (Hgt) 5.4 microgram per dry

standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6181 JTD Units 1 & 2 June 2007 Test

SP1 1 PM (Filterable) 0.0026 FALSE 6181 JTD Units 1 & 2 June 2007 Test

SP1 1 PM (Condensable) 0.0029 FALSE 6181 JTD Units 1 & 2 June 2007 Test

SP1 2 PM (Filterable) 0.0012 FALSE 6181 JTD Units 1 & 2 June 2007 Test

SP1 2 PM (Condensable) 0.0012 FALSE 6181 JTD Units 1 & 2 June 2007 Test

SP1 3 PM (Filterable) 0.0016 FALSE 6181 JTD Units 1 & 2 June 2007 Test

SP1 3 PM (Condensable) 0.0009 FALSE 6181 JTD Units 1 & 2 June 2007 Test

SP1 average PM (Filterable) 0.0018 FALSE 6181 JTD Units 1 & 2 June 2007 Test

SP1 average PM (Condensable) 0.0017 FALSE 6181 JTD Units 1 & 2 June 2007 Test

SP1 4 Total Hydrocarbons (THC) (as Methane) 3.4 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 6181 JTD Units 1 & 2 June 2007 Test

SP1 5 Total Hydrocarbons (THC) (as Methane) 3.4 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 6181 JTD Units 1 & 2 June 2007 Test

SP1 6 Total Hydrocarbons (THC) (as Methane) 3.4 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 6181 JTD Units 1 & 2 June 2007 Test

SP1 7 Total Hydrocarbons (THC) (as Methane) 3.4 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 6181 JTD Unit 1 June 2005 Test

Outlet Duct1

1 Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) 83 parts per million by

volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 6181 JTD Unit 1 June 2005 Test

Outlet Duct1

1 Carbon Monoxide (CO) 37 parts per million by

volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 6181 JTD Unit 1 June 2005 Test

Outlet Duct1

2 Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) 84 parts per million by

volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 6181 JTD Unit 1 June 2005 Test

Outlet Duct1

2 Carbon Monoxide (CO) 50 parts per million by

volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 6181 JTD Unit 1 June 2005 Test

Outlet Duct1

3 Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) 83 parts per million by

volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 6181 JTD Unit 1 June 2005 Test

Outlet Duct1

3 Carbon Monoxide (CO) 51 parts per million by

volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 6181 JTD Unit 1 June 2005 Test

Outlet Duct1

average Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) 83 parts per million by

volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 6181 JTD Unit 1 June 2005 Test

Outlet Duct1

average Carbon Monoxide (CO) 46 parts per million by

volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 7097 JKS Unit 1 Test Report May 2006 SP1 2 PM (Filterable) 0.005 FALSE 7097 JKS Unit 1 Test Report May 2006 SP1 2 PM (Condensable) 0.01 FALSE 7097 JKS Unit 1 Test Report May 2006 SP1 3 PM (Filterable) 0.006 FALSE 7097 JKS Unit 1 Test Report May 2006 SP1 3 PM (Condensable) 0.01 FALSE 7097 JKS Unit 1 Test Report May 2006 SP1 4 PM (Filterable) 0.002 FALSE 7097 JKS Unit 1 Test Report May 2006 SP1 4 PM (Condensable) 0.005 FALSE 7097 JKS Unit 1 Test Report May 2006 SP1 average PM (Filterable) 0.004 FALSE 7097 JKS Unit 1 Test Report May 2006 SP1 average PM (Condensable) 0.008 FALSE 6181 JTD Unit 2 June 2005 Test

Outlet Duct2

1 Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) 64 parts per million by

volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 6181 JTD Unit 2 June 2005 Test

Outlet Duct2

1 Carbon Monoxide (CO) 83 parts per million by

volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 6181 JTD Unit 2 June 2005 Test

Outlet Duct2

2 Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) 63 parts per million by

volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 6181 JTD Unit 2 June 2005 Test

Outlet Duct2

2 Carbon Monoxide (CO) 90 parts per million by

volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 6181 JTD Unit 2 June 2005 Test

Outlet Duct2

3 Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) 63 parts per million by

volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 6181 JTD Unit 2 June 2005 Test

Outlet Duct2

3 Carbon Monoxide (CO) 125 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 6181 JTD Mercury

Speciation Nov 2007 Test SP1 1 Particulate-bound Mercury (Hgp) 0.04 microgram per normal cubic meter (

FALSE 6181 JTD Unit 2 June 2005 Test

Outlet Duct2

average Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) 63 parts per million by

volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 6181 JTD Unit 2 June 2005 Test

Outlet Duct2

average Carbon Monoxide (CO) 99 parts per million by

volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 7097 JKS Unit 1 Test Report June 2009

SP1 1 Hydrogen Fluoride (HF) 0.23 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 7097 JKS Unit 1 Test Report June 2009

SP1 2 Hydrogen Fluoride (HF) 0.23 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 7097 JKS Unit 1 Test Report June 2009

SP1 3 Hydrogen Fluoride (HF) 0.23 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 7097 JKS Unit 1 Test Report June 2009

SP1 average Hydrogen Fluoride (HF) 0.23 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 7097 JKS Unit 1 Test Report June 2009

SP1 4 Beryllium(Be) 0.11 microgram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 7097 JKS Unit 1 Test Report June 2009

SP1 4 Lead (Pb) 1.88 microgram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 7097 JKS Unit 1 Test Report June 2009

SP1 4 Total Mercury (Hgt) 5.94 microgram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 7097 JKS Unit 1 Test Report June 2009

SP1 5 Beryllium(Be) 0.11 microgram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 7097 JKS Unit 1 Test Report June 2009

SP1 5 Lead (Pb) 3.69 microgram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 7097 JKS Unit 1 Test Report June 2009

SP1 5 Total Mercury (Hgt) 4.1 microgram per dry

standard cubic meter ( FALSE 7097 JKS Unit 1 Test Report June 2009

SP1 6 Beryllium(Be) 0.1 microgram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE

Page 78sampling_run_pollutants1

7097 JKS Unit 1 Test Report June 2009

SP1 6 Lead (Pb) 0.66 microgram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 7097 JKS Unit 1 Test Report June 2009

SP1 6 Total Mercury (Hgt) 4.8 microgram per dry

standard cubic meter ( FALSE 7097 JKS Unit 1 Test Report June 2009

SP1 7 Beryllium(Be) 0.11 microgram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 7097 JKS Unit 1 Test Report June 2009

SP1 7 Lead (Pb) 2.08 microgram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 7097 JKS Unit 1 Test Report June 2009

SP1 7 Total Mercury (Hgt) 4.95 microgram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 7097 JKS Unit 1 Test Report June 2008

SP1 1 PM (Filterable) 0.0023 FALSE 7097 JKS Unit 1 Test Report June 2008

SP1 1 PM (Condensable) 0.0039 FALSE 7097 JKS Unit 1 Test Report June 2008

SP1 2 PM (Filterable) 0.0011 FALSE 7097 JKS Unit 1 Test Report June 2008

SP1 2 PM (Condensable) 0.0008 FALSE 7097 JKS Unit 1 Test Report June 2008

SP1 3 PM (Filterable) 0.0011 FALSE 7097 JKS Unit 1 Test Report June 2008

SP1 3 PM (Condensable) 0.0015 FALSE 7097 JKS Unit 1 Test Report June 2008

SP1 average PM (Filterable) 0.0015 FALSE 7097 JKS Unit 1 Test Report June 2008

SP1 average PM (Condensable) 0.0021 FALSE 6181 JTD Mercury

Em issions Test Nov 2007 SP1 1 Total Mercury (Hgt) FALSE 6181 JTD Mercury

Em issions Test Nov 2007 SP1 2 Total Mercury (Hgt) FALSE 6181 JTD Mercury

Em issions Test Nov 2007 SP1 3 Total Mercury (Hgt) FALSE 6181 JTD Mercury

Em issions Test Nov 2007 SP1 average Total Mercury (Hgt) FALSE 7097 JKS Mercury

Em ission Test Nov 2007 SP1 1 Total Mercury (Hgt) FALSE 7097 JKS Mercury

Em ission Test Nov 2007 SP1 2 Total Mercury (Hgt) FALSE 7097 JKS Mercury

Em ission Test Nov 2007 SP1 3 Total Mercury (Hgt) FALSE 7097 JKS Mercury

Em ission Test Nov 2007 SP1 4 Total Mercury (Hgt) FALSE 7097 JKS Mercury

Em ission Test Nov 2007 SP1 average Total Mercury (Hgt) FALSE 6181 JTD Mercury

Em ission Test Sept 2007 SP1 1 Particulate-bound Mercury (Hgp) 0.013 microgram per normal cubic meter (

FALSE 6181 JTD Mercury

Em ission Test Sept 2007 SP1 1 Oxidized Mercury (Hg++) 6.167 microgram per normal cubic meter (

FALSE 6181 JTD Mercury

Em ission Test Sept 2007 SP1 1 Elem ental Mercury (Hg0) 3.778 microgram per normal cubic meter (

FALSE 6181 JTD Mercury

Em ission Test Sept 2007 SP1 1 Total Mercury (Hgt) 9.958 microgram per normal cubic meter (

FALSE 6181 JTD Mercury

Em ission Test Sept 2007 SP1 2 Particulate-bound Mercury (Hgp) 0.013 microgram per normal cubic meter (

FALSE 6181 JTD Mercury

Em ission Test Sept 2007 SP1 2 Oxidized Mercury (Hg++) 6.384 microgram per normal cubic meter (

FALSE 6181 JTD Mercury

Em ission Test Sept 2007 SP1 2 Elem ental Mercury (Hg0) 3.719 microgram per normal cubic meter (

FALSE 6181 JTD Mercury

Em ission Test Sept 2007 SP1 2 Total Mercury (Hgt) 10.116 microgram per normal cubic meter (

FALSE 6181 JTD Mercury

Em ission Test Sept 2007 SP1 3 Particulate-bound Mercury (Hgp) 0.199 microgram per normal cubic meter (

FALSE 6181 JTD Mercury

Em ission Test Sept 2007 SP1 3 Oxidized Mercury (Hg++) 5.113 microgram per normal cubic meter (

FALSE 6181 JTD Mercury

Em ission Test Sept 2007 SP1 3 Elem ental Mercury (Hg0) 3.093 microgram per normal cubic meter (

FALSE 6181 JTD Mercury

Em ission Test Sept 2007 SP1 3 Total Mercury (Hgt) 8.405 microgram per normal cubic meter (

FALSE 6181 JTD Mercury

Em ission Test Sept 2007 SP1 average Particulate-bound Mercury (Hgp) 0.075 microgram per normal cubic meter (

FALSE 6181 JTD Mercury

Em ission Test Sept 2007 SP1 average Oxidized Mercury (Hg++) 5.888 microgram per normal cubic meter (

FALSE 6181 JTD Mercury

Em ission Test Sept 2007 SP1 average Elem ental Mercury (Hg0) 3.53 microgram per normal cubic meter (

FALSE 6181 JTD Mercury

Em ission Test Sept 2007 SP1 average Total Mercury (Hgt) 9.493 microgram per normal cubic meter (

FALSE 6181 JTD Mercury

Speciation Nov 2007 Test SP1 1 Total Mercury (Hgt) 7.78 microgram per normal cubic meter (

FALSE 6181 JTD Mercury

Speciation Nov 2007 Test SP1 2 Particulate-bound Mercury (Hgp) 0.04 microgram per normal cubic meter (

FALSE 6181 JTD Mercury

Speciation Nov 2007 Test SP1 2 Total Mercury (Hgt) 7.67 microgram per normal cubic meter (

FALSE 6181 JTD Mercury

Speciation Nov 2007 Test SP1 3 Particulate-bound Mercury (Hgp) 0.05 microgram per normal cubic meter (

FALSE 6181 JTD Mercury

Speciation Nov 2007 Test SP1 3 Elem ental Mercury (Hg0) 1.37 microgram per normal cubic meter (

FALSE 6181 JTD Mercury

Speciation Nov 2007 Test SP1 3 Oxidized Mercury (Hg++) 4.72 microgram per normal cubic meter (

FALSE 6181 JTD Mercury

Speciation Nov 2007 Test SP1 4 Particulate-bound Mercury (Hgp) 0.17 microgram per normal cubic meter (

FALSE 6181 JTD Mercury

Speciation Nov 2007 Test SP1 4 Elem ental Mercury (Hg0) 1.28 microgram per normal cubic meter (

FALSE 6181 JTD Mercury

Speciation Nov 2007 Test SP1 4 Oxidized Mercury (Hg++) 4.7 microgram per normal cubic meter (

FALSE 7097 JKS Mercury

Speciation Nov 2007 SP1 1 Total Mercury (Hgt) 2.35 microgram per normal cubic meter (

FALSE 7097 JKS Mercury

Speciation Nov 2007 SP1 2 Total Mercury (Hgt) 2.43 microgram per normal cubic meter (

FALSE 7097 JKS Mercury

Speciation Nov 2007 SP1 3 Particulate-bound Mercury (Hgp) 0.01 microgram per normal cubic meter (

FALSE 7097 JKS Mercury

Speciation Nov 2007 SP1 3 Elem ental Mercury (Hg0) 0.99 microgram per normal cubic meter (

FALSE 7097 JKS Mercury

Speciation Nov 2007 SP1 3 Oxidized Mercury (Hg++) 1.13 microgram per normal cubic meter (

FALSE

Page 79sampling_run_pollutants1

7097 JKS Mercury

Speciation Nov 2007 SP1 4 Particulate-bound Mercury (Hgp) 0.02 microgram per normal cubic meter (

FALSE 7097 JKS Mercury

Speciation Nov 2007 SP1 4 Elem ental Mercury (Hg0) 0.91 microgram per normal cubic meter (

FALSE 7097 JKS Mercury

Speciation Nov 2007 SP1 4 Oxidized Mercury (Hg++) 1.22 microgram per normal cubic meter (

FALSE

Page 80sampling_run_pollutants1

em ission_rate

em ission_rate_units

em ission_rate_ND

em ission_rate_MDL

em ission_factor

em ission_factor_units

em ission_factor_ND

em ission_factor_MDL

run_pollutant_comment 0.019 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE FALSE 0.024 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE FALSE 0.021 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE FALSE 42 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.005 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE gr/dscf 48 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.006 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE gr/dscf 20 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.002 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE gr/dscf 19 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.002 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE gr/dscf 26 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.003 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE gr/dscf 15 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.002 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE gr/dscf 30 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.004 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE gr/dscf 27 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.003 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE gr/dscf 12 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0014 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE less than 3.4, 12 and .0014 12 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0014 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE less than 3.4,12,.0014 12 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0014 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE less than 3.4, 12, .0014 12 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0014 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE less than 3.4, 12, .0014 FALSE 0.132 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE FALSE 0.036 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE FALSE 0.132 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE FALSE 0.048 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE FALSE 0.13 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE FALSE 0.049 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE FALSE 0.131 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE FALSE 0.044 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 58 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.008 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE gr/dscf 132 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.019 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE gr/dscf 67 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.01 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE gr/dscf 116 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.017 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE gr/dscf 30 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.005 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE gr/dscf 58 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.009 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE gr/dscf 52 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.008 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE gr/dscf 102 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.015 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE gr/dscf FALSE 0.097 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE FALSE 0.076 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE FALSE 0.097 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE FALSE 0.084 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE FALSE 0.097 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE FALSE 0.117 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE 0.097 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE FALSE 0.093 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.9 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.00016 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE all of the HF values are < (less than) the value in the actual report 0.89 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.00015 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE all of the HF values are < (less than) values in the actual report 0.88 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.00015 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE all of the HF values are < (less than) the value in the actual report 0.89 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.00016 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE all of the HF values are < (less than) values in the actual report 0.00049 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 8.7E-08 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.0085 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 1.5E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.027 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 4.8E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.00049 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 8.6E-08 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.017 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 2.9E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.019 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 3.3E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.00047 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 8.2E-08 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE

Page 81sampling_run_pollutants1

0.003 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 5.3E-07 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.022 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 3.9E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.00048 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 8.5E-08 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE this is the avg of runs 4,5,6 0.0095 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 1.7E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE this is the avg of runs 4,5,6 0.023 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.000004 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE this is the avg of runs 4,5,6 25 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0044 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE gr/dscf 42 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0074 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE gr/dscf 13 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0021 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE gr/dscf 9.2 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0015 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE gr/dscf 12 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0021 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE gr/dscf 17 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0028 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE gr/dscf 17 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0029 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE gr/dscf 23 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0039 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE gr/dscf 0.031 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE FALSE 0.061 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE FALSE 0.058 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE FALSE 0.06 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE FALSE 0.011 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE FALSE 0.012 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE FALSE 0.014 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE FALSE 0.012 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE FALSE 0.012 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE FALSE FALSE 0.012 pound per trillion British Thermal Unit (lb/1012Btu) FALSE FALSE 5.663 pound per trillion British Thermal Unit (lb/1012Btu) FALSE FALSE 3.469 pound per trillion British Thermal Unit (lb/1012Btu) FALSE FALSE 9.144 pound per trillion British Thermal Unit (lb/1012Btu) FALSE FALSE 0.011 pound per trillion British Thermal Unit (lb/1012Btu) FALSE FALSE 5.779 pound per trillion British Thermal Unit (lb/1012Btu) FALSE FALSE 3.366 pound per trillion British Thermal Unit (lb/1012Btu) FALSE FALSE 9.156 pound per trillion British Thermal Unit (lb/1012Btu) FALSE FALSE 0.178 pound per trillion British Thermal Unit (lb/1012Btu) FALSE FALSE 4.563 pound per trillion British Thermal Unit (lb/1012Btu) FALSE FALSE 2.761 pound per trillion British Thermal Unit (lb/1012Btu) FALSE FALSE 7.502 pound per trillion British Thermal Unit (lb/1012Btu) FALSE FALSE 0.067 pound per trillion British Thermal Unit (lb/1012Btu) FALSE FALSE 5.335 pound per trillion British Thermal Unit (lb/1012Btu) FALSE FALSE 3.199 pound per trillion British Thermal Unit (lb/1012Btu) FALSE FALSE 8.601 pound per trillion British Thermal Unit (lb/1012Btu) FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE

Page 82sampling_run_pollutants1

FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE

Page 83sampling_run_pollutants1

run_pollutant_comment

less than 3.4, 12 and .0014 less than 3.4,12,.0014 less than 3.4, 12, .0014 less than 3.4, 12, .0014

all of the HF values are < (less than) the value in the actual report all of the HF values are < (less than) values in the actual report all of the HF values are < (less than) the value in the actual report all of the HF values are < (less than) values in the actual report

Page 84sampling_run_pollutants1

this is the avg of runs 4,5,6 this is the avg of runs 4,5,6 this is the avg of runs 4,5,6

Page 85sampling_run_fuel

facility _id report_id sampling_port_id run_id fuel_pollutant fuel_conc fuel_conc_units fuel_conc_ND

fuel_conc_MDL

Page 86sampling_run_fuel

fuel_conc_MDL

Page 87