alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from
     LONGHORN, INC.  June 30, 1999  financial  statements and
     is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                         0000819818
<NAME>                        LONGHORN, INC.


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999

<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999

<CASH>                                                   0
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                          (1,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             0
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          0
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                             0
<EPS-BASIC>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0



</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT  23(b)





                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



                 We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.33-58311) pertaining to the United States
Lime & Minerals, Inc. 1992 Stock Option Plan,  as amended,  of our report dated
February 1, 1994,  with  respect to the  consolidated financial statements  of
United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. and subsidiaries  included in the Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995.



                                        ARONSON, FETRIDGE & WEIGLE



Rockville, Maryland
February 28, 1996
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted), Vijay B. Samant, the Chief Executive Officer of Vical Incorporated (the Company), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



|1. | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Periodic Report),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Periodic
Report and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Periodic Report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|Dated: August 7, 2009  
|                       
|/s/ VIJAY B. SAMANT    
|Vijay B. Samant        
|Chief Executive Officer

THIS CERTIFICATION ACCOMPANIES THE FORM 10-Q TO WHICH IT RELATES, IS NOT DEEMED FILED WITH THE SEC AND
IS NOT TO BE INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO ANY FILING OF THE COMPANY UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, OR THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED (WHETHER MADE BEFORE OR AFTER THE DATE OF THE FORM 10-Q), IRRESPECTIVE OF ANY
GENERAL INCORPORATION LANGUAGE CONTAINED IN SUCH FILING. A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS CERTIFICATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE COMPANY AND WILL BE RETAINED BY THE COMPANY AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON
REQUEST.
No. 11-11101.

#### Finley *v.*Bergh, Warden.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-10670.

#### Gato *v.*Smith, Warden, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EEOC - Login.gov User Experience Steps 

STEP ONE: Browse to the EEOC ArkCase FOIA Web Portal (https://eeoc.arkcase.com/foia/) 

STEP TWO: User will be redirected to Login.gov (https://secure.login.gov/ or comparable URL)

STEP THREE: User will be prompted to Login or Create an Account

a. Login

i. User will enter their Login.gov ‘email address’ and ‘password’ and click the ‘Sign 

in’ button

ii. If User is not creating an account, jump to ‘STEP FOUR’ below

b. Create an Account
i. User will click ‘Create an account’

ii. User will enter the specific information below:

1. ‘Email Address’

2. ‘Language Preference’

3. ‘I read and accept the Login.gov Rules of Use’

iii. Then User will click the ‘Submit’ button

iv. Now User will need to check their email from Login.gov

v. User then opens the email from Login.gov
vi. User will click the ‘Confirm email address’ button in the email

vii. User will then set up their password

viii. User will click the ‘Continue’ button to save password

ix. Then User will set their two-factor authentication option and click the 

‘Continue’ button
x. User will enter the two-factor authentication detail (i.e., ‘Text or Voice 

Message’)

xi. User will enter the information to validate 
xii. User’s account is now set up

xiii. Proceed to ‘STEP FOUR’

STEP FOUR: Now User is redirected back to the EEOC ArkCase FOIA Web Portal

STEP FIVE: User will then be validated to confirm that ArkCase has an account for that specific Login.gov 

User, which we match on email address

STEP SIX: If User exists on the EEOC ArkCase FOIA Web Portal, User will be redirected to the ‘New FOIA 

Request’ page and will be automatically logged into the Web Portal

STEP SEVEN: If User doesn’t exist on the EEOC ArkCase FOIA Web Portal, User will be redirected to a 

create account webpage, where they will be required to fill out fields below:

a. Prefix (Mandatory) 

b. First Name (Mandatory)

c. Middle Name (Optional)

d. Last Name (Mandatory)

e. Position (Optional)

f. Phone (Optional)

g. Organization (Optional)

h. Country (Mandatory)

i. Address Type (Mandatory)

j. Address 1 (Mandatory)

k. Address 2 (Optional)

l. City (Mandatory)

m. State/Province (Mandatory)

n. Zip/Postal (Mandatory)
STEP EIGHT: Once the new Login.gov User is created, the new User will be redirected to the ‘New FOIA 

Request’ page and will be automatically logged into the Web Portal
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-1664

QUANG T. NGUYEN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MARVIN RUNYON, Postmaster General, United

States Postal Service,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CA-97-1054-A)

Submitted: November 17, 1998 Decided: November 30, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Quang T. Nguyen, Appellant Pro Se. Leslie Bonner McClendon, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Quang Nguyen appeals from a district court order granting his

employer summary judgment in an action filed under Title VII of the

Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2 (1994).

Nguyen contends that the United States Postal Service (“employer”)

failed to grant him a promotion to an Electronic Technician position at its Dulles facility because of his race (Asian). Employer

contends that Nguyen was not hired, among other reasons, because

his score on the relevant entrance exam for the position was far

below the scores of the successful applicants.

Even assuming that Nguyen could establish a prima facie case

of discrimination, he could not prevail in this case without establishing that he was better qualified for the relevant position than

the individuals actually selected. See Evans v. Technologies Applications & Serv. Co., 80 F.3d 954, 960 (4th Cir. 1996). Because it

is undisputed that Nguyen was not as well qualified as the successful applicants, we find that the district court properly granted

employer’s motion for summary judgment. The district court’s order

is therefore affirmed. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
#### RAMSEY QUIJANO *v.*COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

(AC 35131)

Lavine, Beach and Alvord, Js.

Argued January 22—

officially released February 11, 2014

Petitioner’s appeal from the Superior Court in the judicial district of Tolland, *Cobb, J.*

Per Curiam.

The appeal is dismissed.
#### CHARLES D. GIANETTI *v.*DAVID E. GOMBOS ET AL.

(AC 34099)

Lavine, Bear and Pellegrino, Js.

officially released April 23, 2013

*Charles D. Gianetti,*pro se, the appellant (plaintiff).

*David E. Gombos,*pro se, and *Catherine W. Gombos,*pro se, the appellees (defendants).

*Opinion*

PER CURIAM.

After reviewing the record and considering the issue presented by the self-represented plaintiff, Charles D. Gianetti, a physician, in this appeal from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the self-represented defendants, David E. Gombos and Catherine W. Gombos, we are not persuaded that the court committed reversible error.1

The judgment is affirmed.

1

 The plaintiff has presented us with a limited record; see, e.g., Practice Book § 61-10; *Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.*v. *Bertrand,*140 Conn. App. 646, 654, 59 A.3d 864 (2013); and a brief that fails to identify, discuss or analyze any Connecticut statutes or case law relating to the type, meaning and effect of assignments, including but not limited to the relevant statutes or case law existing at the time of the specific assignment prepared by the plaintiff and executed by the defendants in this case. See, e.g., *Carrillo*v. *Goldberg,*141 Conn. App. 299, 307 n.7, 61 A.3d 1164 (2013); *In re Jason M.,*140 Conn. App. 708, 711 n.2, 59 A.3d 902 (2013).

Argued January 15
#### Auto Land Select Cars Inc. v. Lucas

*625
      *Anne*John, for plaintiff.

*Carl P. Izzo Jr.,*for defendant.

April 2, 1987

CICCHETTI, *P.J.,*

Presently before the court are defendant’s preliminary objections. For the following reasons the preliminary objections are denied in part and granted in part.

Plaintiff filed a complaint alleging that he purchased a vehicle from Jerry Nuzum Chevrolet (Nuzum Chevrolet). Nuzum Chevrolet previously acquired the vehicle from defendant, Michael Lucas. During the course of these transactions, the parties believed the odometer registered true and correct mileage. Plaintiff sold the vehicle to Geza Lux, still believing the odometer to be correct. Subsequently, plaintiff was sued by Lux when it was determined that the odometer had been altered.

Plaintiff argues that due to the alteration in the odometer, the value of the vehicle is less than the amount he paid for it. Furthermore, plaintiff seeks to recover the sums he had to expend to defend the Lux suit.

Defendant’s first contention is that plaintiff’s, complaint fails to state a cause of action since the facts alleged do not indicate any injury or damages sustained by plaintiff. This court finds this contention to be without merit.

“In order to sustain a demurrer, it is essential that, plaintiff’s complaint indicate on its face that his claim cannot be sustained, and the law will not permit recovery.” *Gekas v. Shapp,*469 Pa. 1, 5, 364 A.2d 691, 693 (1976). Furthermore, “[i]f there is *626any doubt, this should be resolved in favor of overruling the demurrer.” See Id., at 469, Pa. 6, 364 A.2d 693.

Here, this court finds that the complaint is not deficient on its face. The Vehicle Code provides:

> “A person who, with intent to defraud, violates any requirement imposed under this subchapter shall be liable in an amount equal to the sum of three times the amount of the actual damages sustained or $1,500, whichever is greater, and, in the case of any successful action to enforce the liability, the .costs of the action together with reasonable attorney fees as determined by the court.” 75 Pa.C.S. § 7138(a).

Therefore, it is possible for an individual to recover damages and attorney fees upon showing that a person with an intent to defraud violated any requirement imposed by 75 Pa.C.S. §7131 et seq.

In the instant case, plaintiff alleged that defendant was the initial owner of the vehicle which the plaintiff purchased from Nuzum Chevrolet. When plaintiff sold the vehicle to Geza Lux, the odometer registered 38,804 miles. At all times the parties believed the odometer registered true and correct mileage. Geza Lux then learned the correct odometer reading should have been at least 52,468 miles. If plaintiff can establish that defendant, with an intent to defraud, tampered with the odometer, then plaintiff can recover pursuant to 75 Pa.C.S. §7138.

Looking at the complaint, the alleged facts indicate that plaintiff sustained injury of damages. Therefore, this court will deny the demurrer.
-81 -80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75

 38

 39

 40

 41

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

07/17

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 17 Jul 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.81 N 76.74 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

★ ■

■

■

■

★

●

●

★

●

● ●

●
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 928 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 928

 To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to identify aliens who 
 have served, or are serving, in the Armed Forces of the United States 
when those aliens apply for an immigration benefit or are placed in an 
      immigration enforcement proceeding, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 30, 2019

    Mr. Vargas (for himself, Mr. Takano, Mr. Vela, and Ms. Gabbard) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to identify aliens who 
 have served, or are serving, in the Armed Forces of the United States 
when those aliens apply for an immigration benefit or are placed in an 
      immigration enforcement proceeding, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Immigrant Veterans Eligibility 
Tracking System (I-VETS) Act''.

SEC. 2. IDENTIFYING ALIENS CONNECTED TO THE ARMED FORCES.

    The Secretary of Homeland Security shall--
            (1) identify aliens, when those aliens apply for an 
        immigration benefit or are placed in an immigration enforcement 
        proceeding, who are serving, or have served, as a member of a 
        regular or reserve component of the Armed Forces of the United 
        States on active duty or as a member of a reserve component of 
        the Armed Forces in an active status; and
            (2) annotate all immigration and naturalization records of 
        the Department of Homeland Security relating to an alien 
        identified pursuant to paragraph (1) so as to reflect that 
        identification and afford an opportunity to track the outcomes 
        for such aliens.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


      Pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  1350, the undersigned  officer
of  Harold's Stores, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby  certifies
that  the  Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q  for  the
quarter ended October 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies
with  the  requirements  of  Section  13(a)  or  15(d),   as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and  that
the information contained in the Report fairly presents,  in
all  material respects, the financial condition and  results
of operations of the Company.

Date: December 14, 2004       /s/ Hugh Mullins
                              Hugh Mullins
                              President and Chief
                              Executive Officer
# Euroopa Liidu C 179A/25.

| | ISSN 1977-0898 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopa Liidu
  Teataja | C 179A |
| | |
| Eestikeelne väljaanne | Teave ja teatised | 61. aastakäik25. mai 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0898

Euroopa Liidu

Teataja

C 179A

Eestikeelne väljaanne

Teave ja teatised

61. aastakäik25. mai 2018

---

| Sisukord | Lehekülg |
| --- | --- |
| | Parandused |
| 2018/C 179 A/01 | Töölevõtmise teadaande nr PE/197/S parandus ( ELT C 144 A, 25.4.2018 ) | 1 |

Sisukord

Lehekülg

Parandused

2018/C 179 A/01

Töölevõtmise teadaande nr PE/197/S parandus ( ELT C 144 A, 25.4.2018 )

( ELT C 144 A, 25.4.2018 )

1

---

| ET | |
| --- | --- |

ET

---

Parandused

| 25.5.2018 | ET | Euroopa Liidu Teataja | CA 179/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.5.2018

ET

Euroopa Liidu Teataja

CA 179/1

---

Töölevõtmise teadaande nr PE/197/S parandus

(
  Euroopa Liidu Teataja C 144 A, 25. aprill 2018
  )

(2018/C 179 A/01)

Leheküljel 1

asendatakse

„Euroopa Parlament korraldab kvalifikatsioonil ja katsetel põhineva valikumenetluse, mille tulemusena koostatakse sobivate kandidaatide nimekiri 11 töötaja leidmiseks järgmisele ametikohale:“

järgmisega:

järgmisega:

„Euroopa Parlament korraldab kvalifikatsioonil ja katsetel põhineva valikumenetluse, mille tulemusena koostatakse sobivate kandidaatide nimekiri töötajate leidmiseks järgmisele ametikohale:“.

Leheküljel 2 jaotise A punkti 1 „Üldine teave“ esimeses lõigus

Leheküljel 2 jaotise A punkti 1 „Üldine teave“ esimeses lõigus

asendatakse

asendatakse

„Euroopa Parlament on otsustanud alustada menetlust 11 isikukaitse ametniku (1) ajutise ametikoha (AST 3) täitmiseks turvalisuse ja ohutuse peadirektoraadi koosseisu kuuluvas turvalisuse, kaitse ja ohutuse direktoraadis.“

järgmisega:

järgmisega:

„Euroopa Parlament on otsustanud alustada menetlust isikukaitse ametniku (1) ajutiste ametikohtade (AST 3) täitmiseks turvalisuse ja ohutuse peadirektoraadi koosseisu kuuluvas turvalisuse, kaitse ja ohutuse direktoraadis.“

---

(1)  Käesoleva teadaande teatavates keeleversioonides kasutatava meessoost vormiga hõlmatakse ka naissoost kandidaate ja vastupidi.

1

---
Presidential Documents

12529

Federal Register

Vol. 62, No. 50

Friday, March 14, 1997

Title 3—

The President

Executive Order 13039 of March 11, 1997

Exclusion of the Naval Special Warfare Development Group

From the Federal Labor-Management Relations Program

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the

laws of the United States of America, including section 7103(b)(1) of title

5 of the United States Code, and having determined that the Naval Special

Warfare Development Group has as a primary function intelligence, counterintelligence, investigative, or national security work and that the provisions

of Chapter 71 of title 5 of the United States Code cannot be applied to

this organization in a manner consistent with national security requirements

and considerations, Executive Order 12171 of November 19, 1979, as amended, is further amended by adding the following at the end of section 1-

205:

[FR Doc. 97–6703

‘‘(i) Naval Special Warfare Development Group.’’

THE WHITE HOUSE,

March 11, 1997.

œ–

Filed 3–13–97; 8:45 am]

Billing code 3195–01–P
# C_2023173EN.01001002.xml

| 15.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 173/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 173/10

---

Appeal brought on 28 November 2022 by G-Core Innovations Sàrl against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 28 September 2022 in Case T-454/21, G-Core Innovations v EUIPO — Coretransform (G CORELABS)

(Case C-732/22 P)

(2023/C 173/14)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: G-Core Innovations Sàrl (represented by: L. Axel Karnøe Søndergaard, advokat)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office, Coretransform

By order of 23 March 2023, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) held that the appeal was not allowed to proceed and that G-Core Innovations Sàrl should bear its own costs.

---