alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 46 (Monday, March 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 10854]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5889]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-5700-5]


Proposed Settlement Under Section 122(h) of Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice of proposed administrative settlement and opportunity 
for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to 
enter into an administrative settlement to resolve claims under the 
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act 
of 1980 (CERCLA), as amended. Notice is being published to inform the 
public of the proposed settlement and of the opportunity to comment. 
This settlement is intended to resolve liabilities of one party for 
costs incurred by EPA at the M & T Delisa Superfund Site.

DATE: Comments must be provided on or before April 9, 1997.

ADDRESS: Comments should be addressed to the U.S. Environmental 
Protection Agency, Office of Regional Counsel, New Jersey Superfund 
Branch, 17th Floor, New York, New York 10007-1866 and should refer to: 
In the Matter of: M & T Delisa Site, U.S. EPA Index No. II-CERCLA-97-
0102.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 
Office of Regional Counsel, New Jersey Superfund Branch, Superfund 
Branch, 17th Floor, New York, New York 10007-1866. Attention: Denise 
Finn, Esq., (212) 637-3135.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with Section 122(i)(1) of 
CERCLA, notice is hereby given of a proposed administrative settlement 
concerning the M & T Delisa Superfund Site which is located in Ocean 
Township, Monmouth County, New Jersey. Section 122(h) of CERCLA 
provides EPA with authority to consider, compromise, and settle certain 
claims for costs incurred by the United States.
    The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States is 
committed to participate in this settlement. The Settling Party will 
pay a total of $251,324 under this agreement to reimburse EPA for 
response costs incurred at the M & T Delisa Site.
    A copy of the proposed administrative settlement agreement, as well 
as background information relating to the settlement, may be obtained 
in person or by mail from EPA's Region II Office of Regional Counsel, 
New Jersey Superfund Branch, 290 Broadway, 17th Floor, New York, NY 
10007-1866.

    Dated: February 5, 1997.
William J. Muszynski,
Acting Regional Administrator.
[FR Doc. 97-5889 Filed 3-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 52 (Tuesday, March 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12836-12837]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6790]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[ES-931-07-1430-01; MIES-033804]


Public Land Order No. 7249; Partial Revocation of Executive Order 
Dated July 24, 1875; Michigan

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Public Land Order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This order revokes an Executive order insofar as it affects 
1.70 acres of public land withdrawn for use by the U.S. Coast Guard for 
lighthouse purposes. The land is no longer needed for lighthouse 
purposes. This action will open the land to surface entry. The land has 
been and remains open to mineral leasing.


[[Page 12837]]


EFFECTIVE DATE: April 17, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ed Ruda, BLM Eastern States Office, 
7450 Boston Boulevard, Springfield, Virginia 22153, 703-440-1671.
    By virtue of the authority vested in the Secretary of the Interior 
by Section 204 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, 
43 U.S.C. 1714 (1988) it is ordered as follows:
    1. The Executive Order dated July 24, 1875, which withdrew public 
land for use as lighthouse purposes, is hereby revoked insofar as it 
affects the following described land:

Michigan Meridian

Point Betsie Lighthouse

T. 26 N., R. 16 W.,
    Sec. 4, lot 10.

    The area described contains 1.70 acres in Benzie County.

    2. At 10:00 a.m. on April 17, 1997 the land will be opened to the 
operation of the public land laws generally, subject to valid existing 
rights, the provisions of existing withdrawals, other segregations of 
record, and the requirements of applicable law. All valid applications 
received at or prior to 10 a.m. on April 17, 1997 shall be considered 
as simultaneously filed at that time. Those received thereafter shall 
be considered in the order of filing.

    Dated: February 19, 1997
Bob Armstrong,
Assistant Secretary of the Interior.
[FR Doc. 97-6790 Filed 3-17-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GJ-P
No. 11-1085.

#### Amgen Inc. et al. *v.*Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust Funds.

C. A. 9th Cir. [Certiorari granted, *ante,*p. 905.] Motion of petitioners to dispense with printing the joint appendix granted.

Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000083877
<NAME>                        Richton International Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                          1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                                 474
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       16,982
<ALLOWANCES>                                           690
<INVENTORY>                                         16,190
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    34,051
<PP&E>                                               2,633
<DEPRECIATION>                                       1,038
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      41,590
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               26,679
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               309
<OTHER-SE>                                           9,011
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        41,590
<SALES>                                            106,523
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   106,523
<CGS>                                               76,334
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    24,684
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   1,334
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      4,171
<INCOME-TAX>                                         1,881
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  2,290
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         2,290
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0.68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.68
        


</TABLE>
# C_2023179EN.01001101.xml

| 22.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/11

---

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 March 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — Eurowings GmbH v Flightright GmbH

(Case C-607/22, (1) Eurowings (Non-existent flight))

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Air transport - Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 - Common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights - Article 2 - Concept of ‘operating air carrier’ - Flight booked through a tour operator - Allegedly non-existent flight)

(2023/C 179/14)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landgericht Düsseldorf

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Eurowings GmbH

Respondent: Flightright GmbH

Operative part of the order

Article 2(b) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91,

must be interpreted as meaning that an air carrier cannot be classified as an ‘operating air carrier’, within the meaning of that provision, where a passenger has concluded a contract with a tour operator for a particular flight, with a flight number and a date, which was supposed to be operated by that air carrier, without the air carrier ever having scheduled a flight with that flight number for that date, but may be regarded as an ‘operating air carrier’, within the meaning of that provision, where it has made an offer which, as the case may be, has been the subject of subsequent amendments on its part.

---

(1)  Date lodged: 20.9.2022.

---
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****    - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский 

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

        - Student Loans
        - Grants
        - Laws
        - Data

# Уведомление для лиц с ограниченным знанием английского языка

# Уведомление для лиц с ограниченным знанием английского языка

                                    -        Управление по гражданским правам
Если вы испытываете трудности в понимании английского языка, вы можете попросить, чтобы вам предоставили перевод информации,  которую Министерство Образования доводит до всеобщего сведения.  Этот перевод предоставляется бесплатно. Если вы хотите получить более подробную информацию об услугах устного и письменного перевода, звоните по телефону 1-800-USA-LEARN (1-800-872-5327), служба для слабослышащих: (800) 877-8339 TTY / ASCII (American Standard Code For Information Interchange), или отправьте сообщение по адресу: Ed.Language.Assistance@ed.gov.

Вы также можете написать по адресу:

U.S. Department of Education Information Resource CenterLBJ Education Building400 Maryland Ave., S.W.Washington, DC 20202
             How Do I Find...?    - Student loans, forgiveness
- Higher Education Rulemaking
- College accreditation
- Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
- FERPA
- FAFSA
- 1098, tax forms
- More...
      Information About...    - Elevating Teaching
- Early Learning
- Engage Every Student
- Unlocking Career Success
- Cybersecurity
             
*Our mission* is to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness by fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access.
- Student Loans
- Repaying Loans
- Defaulted Loans
- Loan Forgiveness
- Loan Servicers
- Grants & Programs
- Apply for Pell Grants
- Grants Forecast
- Apply for a Grant
- Laws & Guidance
- Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
- FERPA
- Civil Rights
- IDEA Website
- Data & Research
- Education Statistics
- Postsecondary Education Data
- ED Data Express
- Nation's Report Card
- What Works Clearinghouse
- Open Data Platform
- COVID Relief Data
- About Us
- Contact Us
- ED Offices
- Jobs
- Press Releases
- FAQs
- Recursos en español
- Budget, Performance
- Privacy Program
- Homeroom Blog
- Notices
- FOIA
- Privacy Policy
- Accessibility
- Security
- Information Quality
- Inspector General
- Whitehouse.gov
- USA.gov
- Benefits.gov
- Regulations.gov
**Court of Appeals**

**Sixth Appellate District of Texas**

AMENDED JUDGMENT

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court below.  We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We further order that the appellant, Michael Mandel Christian, pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED SEPTEMBER 7, 2012

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk

# image1.png
Exhibit
32(a)








This
Certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise
subject to the liability of that section.  This Certification shall
not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other
document pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, except as otherwise stated in
such filing.








Certification
Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63


of Title
18 of the United States Code








In
connection with the Annual Report of Public Service Company of Oklahoma (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K (the “Report”) for the year ended December 31, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Michael
G. Morris, the chief executive officer of the Company certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 that, based on my knowledge (i) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.








/s/ Michael G.
Morris


Michael
G. Morris


Chief
Executive Officer








February
26, 2010








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
American Electric Power Company, Inc. and will be retained by American Electric
Power Company, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         518,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,175,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,892,000
<PP&E>                                         870,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,364,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,950,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    11,516,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (9,683,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,364,000
<SALES>                                      1,597,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,597,000
<CGS>                                          517,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,251,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               194,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             427,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (792,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (792,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (792,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# C_2022424EN.01003901.xml

| 7.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 424/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 424/39

---

Action brought on 5 September 2022 — QY v Commission

(Case T-551/22)

(2022/C 424/50)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Applicant: QY (represented by: S. Gemas Donário and S. Soares, advogadas)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

| — | annul Commission Decision C(2020) 8550 final, of 4 December 2020, on aid scheme SA.21259 (2018/C) (ex 2018/NN) implemented by Portugal in favour of the Zona Franca da Madeira (ZFM) — Regime III (Madeira Free Zone — Scheme III); |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Commission Decision C(2020) 8550 final, of 4 December 2020, on aid scheme SA.21259 (2018/C) (ex 2018/NN) implemented by Portugal in favour of the Zona Franca da Madeira (ZFM) — Regime III (Madeira Free Zone — Scheme III);

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on six pleas in law.

| 1. | The first plea in law relates to the fulfilment of the requirements for the compatibility of the Zona Franca da Madeira — Regime III, namely the source of the earnings and the creation and maintenance of jobs in the region. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The first plea in law relates to the fulfilment of the requirements for the compatibility of the Zona Franca da Madeira — Regime III, namely the source of the earnings and the creation and maintenance of jobs in the region.

| 2. | The second plea in law relates to the allegedly unjustified delay in the Commission’s response. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The second plea in law relates to the allegedly unjustified delay in the Commission’s response.

| 3. | The third plea in law relates to the alleged failure to comply with the obligation to state reasons. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The third plea in law relates to the alleged failure to comply with the obligation to state reasons.

| 4. | The fourth plea in law relates to the right to a fair hearing. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The fourth plea in law relates to the right to a fair hearing.

| 5. | The fifth plea in law relates to the protection of legitimate expectations. |
| --- | --- |

5.

The fifth plea in law relates to the protection of legitimate expectations.

| 6. | The sixth plea in law relates to the principle of legal certainty. |
| --- | --- |

6.

The sixth plea in law relates to the principle of legal certainty.

---
#### RICHARDS, K. v. UCBR

2090 CD 2016

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

10/06/2017

Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, B-594070

Affirmed
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 97 

To amend the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 to authorize 

rewards for thwarting wildlife trafficking linked to transnational organized crime, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2019 

Mr. BUCHANAN (for himself and Ms. TITUS) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 

1956 to authorize rewards for thwarting wildlife trafficking linked to transnational organized crime, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rescuing Animals 

5 With Rewards Act of 2019’’ or the ‘‘RAWR Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS; SENSE OF CONGRESS. 

7 (a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds the following: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 97 IH

1 (1) Wildlife trafficking is a major transnational 

2 crime that is estimated to generate over $10 billion 

3 a year in illegal profits and which is increasingly 

4 perpetrated by organized, sophisticated criminal en5 terprises, including known terrorist organizations. 

6 (2) Wildlife trafficking not only threatens en7 dangered species worldwide, but also jeopardizes 

8 local security, spreads disease, undermines rule of 

9 law, fuels corruption, and damages economic devel10 opment. 

11 (3) Combating wildlife trafficking requires a co12 ordinated and sustained approach at the global, re13 gional, national, and local levels. 

14 (4) Congress stated in the Eliminate, Neu15 tralize, and Disrupt Wildlife Trafficking Act of 2016 

16 that it is the policy of the United States to take im17 mediate actions to stop the illegal global trade in 

18 wildlife and wildlife products and associated transna19 tional organized crime. 

20 (b) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Con21 gress that the Department of State’s rewards program is 

22 a powerful tool in combating sophisticated international 

23 crime and that the Department of State and Federal law 

24 enforcement should work in concert to offer rewards that 

25 target wildlife traffickers. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 97 IH

1 SEC. 3. REWARDS FOR JUSTICE. 

2 Subparagraph (B) of section 36(k)(5) of the State 

3 Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 (22 U.S.C. 

4 2708(k)(5)) is amended by inserting ‘‘wildlife trafficking 

5 (as defined by section 2(12) of the Eliminate, Neutralize, 

6 and Disrupt Wildlife Trafficking Act of 2016 (16 U.S.C. 

7 7601(12); Public Law 114–231)) and’’ after ‘‘includes’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mayors Jewelers, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the thirteen weeks ended June 26, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, John D. Ball, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Date: August 5, 2004 /s/ John D. BallJohn D. BallSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
No. 11-10673.

#### Folkes *v.*Lee, Warden.

C. A. 2d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
No. 11-10936.

#### Blanchard *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 12-5057.

#### Ladeairous *v.*Supreme Court of Virginia.

Sup. Ct. Va. Certiorari denied.