alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ROBINSON 

HELICOPTER COMPANY 

2901 Airport Drive, Torrance, California 90505 Phone 1310) 539-0508 Fax 1310) 539-5198 

Page 1 of 2 

R44 SERVICE LETTER SL-37 

DATE: 18 June 2010 

TO: R44 & R44 II owners, operators, and maintenance personnel 

SUBJECT: C016-7 Main Rotor Blades 

RACKGROUND: RHC has developed a new main rotor blade, p/n C016-7, which 

incorporates an aluminum skin for better dent protection and corrosion resistance at 

the blade tip. The C016-7 blade is part of the C005-12 blade & spindle assembly, and 

a matched pair may be installed on any fuel-injected R44 II. Installing matched C016-7 

blades on carbureted R44 helicopters, however, requires verifying certain components 

are installed or retrofitted. 

COMPLIANCE PROCEDURE: 

Refer to R44 Illustrated Parts Catalog Figure 7-158 dated JUL 2008. Prior to installing 

p/n C016-7 main rotor blades on a carbureted R44, verify the helicopter has: 

1. hydraulic flight controls. R44s with manual flight controls (electric-trim) must be 

upgraded to hydraulic controls; for details refer to: 

www.robinsonheli.com/pdf_files/r44_factory_overhaul_pricelist.pdf 

2. C792-4 dual tachometer (101-102% engine rpm green arc, p/n R9602 for 

overhauled-exchange unit). 

3. C006-5 or -6 main rotor gearbox (R9594 overhauled-exchange), or C006-3 or -4 

main rotor gearbox with 8900-5 modification (if modified, a separate 8900-5 data 

plate will be adjacent to the C006 data plate). 

4. lower C204-2 arm (steel, 2.52 inches long), connecting gearbox mast to lower fork 

assy with NAS 1305-31 or NAS6605-31 bolts. 

5. lower A205-7 fork assy (3.70 inches center-to-center), attached to non-rotating 

swashplate. 

6. C017-6 swash plate, or C017 -4 swash plate (R9596 overhauled-exchange). 

7. upper A205-7 fork assy (3.85 inches center-to-center), attached to rotating 

swashplate. 

(OVER) 
R44 SL-37 

Page 2 of 2 

8. upper C204-3 arm (steel, 2.87 inches long), connecting upper fork assy to mainrotor-shaft yoke assemblies with NAS1305-31 or NAS6605-31 bolts. 

9. two C203-5 yoke assemblies, on C251-2 main rotor shaft. 

10. two C157 -3 pitch horns, 16-hole flange (included with C005-12 blade & spindle 

assemblies). 

Approximate Cost: 

Refer to www.robinsonheli.com/public for current parts prices.
No. 11-11053.

#### Gary *v.*Hill, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 49 (Thursday, March 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 11846]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6484]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Modernization Transition Committee; Meeting

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

TIME AND DATE: March 18, 1997 from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

PLACE: This meeting will take place at the Red Lion Inn, 400 Industry, 
Astoria, Oregon.

STATUS: The meeting will be open to the public. On March 18, 1997, 9:00 
a.m. to 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. to 3:30 p.m. will be set aside for 
oral comments or questions from the public. Approximately 50 seats will 
be available on a first-come first-served basis for the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: This meeting will cover: consultation of 85 
proposed certification packages, and service level D automation 
criteria update.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Mr. Nicholas Scheller, National 
Weather Service, Modernization Staff, 1325 East-West Highway, SSMC2, 
Silver Spring, Maryland 20910. Telephone: (301) 713-0454.

    Dated: March 11, 1997.
Nicholas R. Scheller,
Manager, National Implementation Staff.
[FR Doc. 97-6484 Filed 3-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-12-M
Exhibit 10.2


 


Unofficial English Summary of Shanghai Real Estate Contract dated
July 7, 2021 between NTIC (Shanghai) Co., Ltd, and Shanghai FASTO Investment Group Limited Company


 


On July 7, 2021, NTIC (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. (“Buyer”),
a wholly owned subsidiary of Northern Technologies International Corporation (the “Company”), entered into a Shanghai
Real Estate Sales Contract (the “Contract”) with Shanghai FASTO Investment Group Limited Company (“Seller”)
to purchase the building located on Building 29, No. 6066 Songze Avenue, Shanghai (the “Property”).


 


The Property is approximately 1941 square meters. The building is
made of steel and concrete and is considered a factory-site.


 


The purchase price for the Property is thirty two million six hundred
and twenty two thousand nine hundred and twelve yuan only (RMB 32,622,912 yuan) (“Purchase Price”). The Purchase Price
includes not only the sale of the Property but also includes the equipment inside the Property. Upon signing of the Contract, the
Buyer shall pay fifty percent (50%) of the Purchase Price, which amounts to sixteen million three hundred and eleven thousand four
hundred and fifty six yuan only (RMB 16,311,456). The Buyer shall pay the remaining fifty percent (50%) of the Purchase Price before
July 15, 2021. The Buyer will be paying the Purchase Price using its self-owned funds.


 


The land where the Property is located is owned by the People’s
Republic of China. Seller has the right to use the land. Both parties will work together to facilitate the transfer of the Seller’s
right to use the land, along with the title and ownership of the Property, to Buyer before January 1, 2022. The Seller will continue
to pay the property management, water, electricity, gas, and telecommunication fees before transfer of the Property is complete.
The Seller will vacate from the Property before January 31, 2022.


 


The Contract is governed by the laws and regulations of the People’s
Republic of China. Any dispute that arises from the Contract may be settled through arbitration with the Shanghai Arbitration Commission
or through trial to be held at the People’s court in Qingpu District.
# C_2022441EN.01000302.xml

| 21.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 441/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 441/3

---

Appeal brought on 28 February 2022 by FT and Others against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 15 December 2021 in Case T-224/20, FT and Others v Commission

(Case C-168/22 P)

(2022/C 441/04)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellants: FT and Others (represented by: J.-N. Louis, avocat)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

By order of 5 October 2022, the Court (Seventh Chamber) dismissed the appeal as manifestly inadmissible and ordered the appellants to bear their own costs.

---
No. 12-5092.

#### Jackson *v.*Taylor et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 4.a



FORM OF

GRID PROMISSORY NOTE



November 13, 2003



For value received, DataJungle Software Inc.  (hereinafter referred to as the Borrower) promises to pay to the order of __________________ (hereinafter referred to as the Lender) in the City of ______, ______ or at such other place as the holder hereof may, from time to time designate in writing, the outstanding principal amount of all advances (collectively the Loan) made by the Lender to the Borrower as recorded by the Lender on the Schedule annexed hereto, in legal and lawful money of United States of America, with interest on the principal outstanding from time to time until paid, both before and after maturity, at the rate of twelve percent (12%) per annum.    This Note evidences the advances made by the Lender to the Borrower from time to time and repayments made by the Borrower to the Lender from time to time.



The principal of this Note is due and payable on demand.  The accrued interest is due and payable annually in arrears on the anniversary date.  The Borrower may pay all or part of any of principal and/or interest before any due date.  Any prepayment may be made without notice, penalty or bonus and any subsequent interest shall be calculated only on any remaining outstanding balance.



In the event this Note, or any part hereof, is collected through Bankruptcy or other judicial proceedings by an attorney or is placed in the hands of an attorney for collection after maturity, then the Borrower agrees and promises to pay a reasonable attorneys fee for collection.



The Borrower expressly requires notice of all demands for payment, presentation for payment, protest and notice of protest, as to this Note but the Lender, payee or other holder of this Note may at any time, from time to time and upon notice in writing to the Borrower, extend the terms of payment or date of maturity hereof.



This Note may be assigned, pledged or hypothecated by the Lender or holder upon notice to the Borrower and is made without recourse to any director, officer or employee of the Borrower.



Any notice, demand or request relating to any matter set forth in this Note shall be given in writing.



This Note shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of ________, _____.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, DataJungle Software Inc. has caused this Note to be duly executed on its behalf by its officer duly authorized thereunto.



DataJungle Software Inc.





Per:______________________



12% Note Holder



|Note Holder                        | Amount Outstanding  
|---------------------------------- | --------------------
|as of December 31, 2003            | as of March 31, 2004
|Metro International Mortgage, Inc. | $42,000
Interagency comments on RIN 2060-AP52 -- RIA Chapter 11 

 Higgins, Cortney 

 to: RobertJ Wayland 

 03/15/2011 12:46 PM 

 Cc: Bill Maxwell, Larry Sorrels, Karen Thundiyil 

1 Attachment 

CHAPTER 11benefit-costcomparisonToxicsRuleRIA_3-

14OMBclean_InteragencycommentsunderEO12866.docx 

Hi Bob,

Attached are interagency comments on the RIA Chapter 11.  Please let me know if you have questions.

Regards,

Cortney

________________________________________________

Cortney Higgins, PhD 

Policy Analyst 

OMB/OIRA/NRE 

202.395.7856 

chiggins@omb.eop.gov
#### VANCE SOLMAN *v.*COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

(AC 35307)

Lavine, Alvord and Peters, Js.

Submitted on briefs March 14—

officially released April 1, 2014

Per Curiam.

The appeal is dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 54 (Thursday, March 20, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 13359-13360]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-7007]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 92-246; RM-8091]


Television Broadcasting Services; Ridgecrest, CA

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule; dismissal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document denies an Application for Review filed by Valley 
Public Television, Inc. (Valley) and affirms the staff's dismissal of 
Valley's rulemaking petition. See 58 FR 58833 (November 4, 1993); 60 FR 
31258 (June 14, 1995). The petition sought to substitute Channel *41 
for vacant Channel *25 (reserved for noncommercial use) at Ridgecrest, 
CA to eliminate a short-spacing between Valley's application for a new 
noncommercial station on Channel *39 at Bakersfield, CA and Channel *25 
at Ridgecrest. The Commission concluded that the rulemaking petition 
was properly dismissed as moot because Valley had withdrawn its 
television application and because no more applications can be filed 
for Channel *39 at Bakersfield. With this action, the proceeding is 
terminated.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: R. Barthen Gorman, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Memorandum Opinion and Order, MM Docket No. 92-246, adopted March 4, 
1997, and released March 14, 1997. The full text of this Commission 
decision is

[[Page 13360]]

available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC's Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW., Washington, 
DC. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractors, International Transcription Service, 
Inc., (202) 857-3800, located at 1919 M Street, NW., Room 246, or 2100 
M Street, NW., Suite 140, Washington, DC 20037.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Television broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
William F. Caton,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-7007 Filed 3-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
THEODORE R. KULONGOSKI Governor

October 13, 2009

Ms. Michelle L. Pirzadeh, Acting Regional Administrator US Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, WA 98101 RE: Recommendation for Designation ofLead Air Quality Areas Dear Ms. Pirzadeh: This letterprovides my recommendation for attainment and nonattainment air quality designations in the State ofOregon for the revised LeadNational Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) as required by Federal regulation, andrequested by you. The State ofOregon, with EPA's concurrence, discontinued all ambient air lead monitoring after 2001. This decision came after considering that no lead concentrations approaching the Standard had been measured for several years, and no increase in sources oflead emissions were anticipated. As aresult, no ambient lead data, consistent with EPA's proposed new monitoring network siting criteria and data collectionrequirements is available anywhere in Oregon. This means there is insufficient data atthis time to evaluate attainment ofthe more protective revised lead NAAQS. Therefore, Irecommend that the entire State ofOregonbe designated as Unclassifiable with respectto this Standard. The State ofOregon is aware ofthe requirement to implement source-oriented ambient air lead monitoring by January 1,2010, and will have thatmonitoring in place by that date. The recent addition of Section 105Federal funds to the Department ofEnvironmental Qualitybudget will make this possible. In addition, a population-oriented monitor will be operating in Portland, as required, by January 2011. Data acquired from these monitors willbe used to determine attainment status. Ifyou have any questions, please contact David Collier, Manager, Air Quality Planning, Air Quality Division, Departmentof Environmental Quality, at (503) 229-5177. 

# 7JiaA

~ THEODORE R. KULO~KI Governor TRK:mc:jb STATE CAPITOL, 900 COURT STREET NE, SALEM OR 97301-4047 (503) 378-3111 FAX (503) 378-6827 WWW.GOVERNOR.OREGON.GOV
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE SIX
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES THERETO CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S QUARTERLY
REPORT ON FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000818813
<NAME> BITSTREAM INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          11,480
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,802
<ALLOWANCES>                                       982
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,505
<PP&E>                                           4,478
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,634
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  17,834
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,035
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               73
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,692
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    17,834
<SALES>                                          4,116
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,116
<CGS>                                              786
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      786
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,348
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,672)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        29
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,701)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,701)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.24)


</TABLE>
No. 11-11004.

#### Ambrose *v.*United States.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             128
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,037
<ALLOWANCES>                                       232
<INVENTORY>                                      8,213
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,750
<PP&E>                                          16,931
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,380
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  40,990
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,036
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            45
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,909
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    40,990
<SALES>                                         48,180
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                48,180
<CGS>                                           26,443
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   51,088
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (58)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   125
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 988
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,838)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,838)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.87)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.87)
        


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-2734
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus CHARLES COURTLAND SMITH, Claimant - Appellant, and ASSORTED JEWELRY; $5,1 16.05 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY; 1985 MERCEDES BENZ, VIN WDBDA24C3 FFO76122; 1988 BLACK JAGUAR XJ6, VIN SAJKV1545JC517422, Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey, II, Senior District Judge. (CA-89-851-H, CA-89-852-H, CA-89-853-H, CA-89-2356-H) Submitted: April 22, 1997 Decided: April 30, 1997 Before MURNAGHAN, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.2 Charles Courtland Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Katharine Jacobs Armentrout, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Charles Smith appeals the district court's order denying his 1996 motion for reconsideration of four civil forfeitures that occurred in 1990. We have reviewed the r ecord and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Smith , Nos. CA-89-851-H; CA-89-852-H; CA-89-853-H; CA-89-2356-H (D. Md. Nov. 6, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

PETER ATEM,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 559 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 6th day of February, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
<PAGE>   1
                                   EXHIBIT 11

                        COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                           Year ended December 31
                                              --------------------------------------------
                                                 1995            1994              1993
                                              ----------      ----------       -----------
<S>                                           <C>             <C>              <C>
A.  Net Income (Loss)                         $6,248,000      $ (977,000)      $(8,972,000)

B.  Unpaid Cumulative Dividends on
      Class A Preferred Stock                    (50,000)       (116,000)              --
                                              ----------      ----------       -----------

C.  Adjusted Net Income (Loss)                $6,198,000     $(1,093,000)      $(8,972,000)

D.  Weighted Average Common Shares             8,175,819       2,874,600         1,244,374

E.  Income (Loss) per Common Share (C/D)      $      .76      $     (.38)      $     (7.21)

</TABLE>












                                       23