alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Submitted June 2,

reversed September 20, 2017

#### In the Matter of B. L. H., a Person Alleged to have a Mental Illness. STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*B. L. H., *Appellant.*

Jackson County Circuit Court

16CC03558; A162626

403 P3d 538

Joseph R. DeBin and Multnomah Defenders, Inc., filed the brief for appellant.

Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Carson L. Whitehead, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Armstrong, Presiding Judge, and Tookey, Judge, and Shorr, Judge.

*886PER CURIAM

In this civil-commitment case, appellant seeks reversal of an order committing him for a period not to exceed 180 days, ORS 426.130(2), and an order prohibiting him from purchasing or possessing firearms, ORS 426.130(1). He contends that the circuit court erred by failing to dismiss the case when appellant was not released after the expiration of an initial five-day hold and appellant had not consented to diversion. The state concedes that the circuit court erred and that the order should be reversed. We agree, accept the state’s concession, and reverse the commitment order.

“Under ORS 426.232(2), a physician may detain a person for emergency care or treatment for mental illness, provided that the physician immediately notifies certain specified local mental health personnel. However, the person may not be held for longer than five judicial days without a hearing except in certain circumstances.” *State v.*W. *B. R.,*282 Or App 727, 728, 387 P3d 482 (2016) (citing ORS 426.232(2); ORS 426.234(4); ORS 426.095(2); *State v. A. E. B.,*196 Or App 634, 635, 106 P3d 647 (2004)). Under ORS 426.237, a person detained on a physician’s hold may be further detained for a 14-day period of intensive treatment if, among other requirements, the person consents to diversion. ORS 426.237(3)(c).

Here, appellant was placed on a physician’s hold on June 7, 2016. On June 10, the mental health examiner filed a certificate for diversion from commitment under ORS 426.237; however, appellant did not consent to diversion. Appellant’s civil commitment hearing was not held until June 16, which was more than five judicial days after his initial hold.

We therefore agree with and accept the state’s concession that the trial court erred in failing to dismiss appellant’s case.

Reversed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 50 (Friday, March 14, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 12200]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6502]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Notice of Agreement(s) Filed

    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following 
agreement(s) under the Shipping Act of 1984.
    Interested parties can review or obtain copies of agreements at the 
Washington, DC offices of the Commission, 800 North Capitol Street, 
N.W., Room 962. Interested parties may submit comments on an agreement 
to the Secretary, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573, 
within 10 days of the date this notice appears in the Federal Register.

Agreement No.: 217-011324-009.
Title: Transpacific Space Utilization Agreement.
Parties:

    American President Lines, Ltd.
    Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd.
    A.P. Moller-Maersk Line
    Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd.
    Neptune Orient Lines, Ltd.
    Nippon Yusen Kaisha Line
    Orient Overseas Container Line, Inc.
    P&O Nedlloyd Limited
    Sea-Land Service, Inc.
    Hapag-Lloyd Container Linie GmbH
    P&O Nedlloyd B.V.

Synopsis: The proposed modification adds Hyundai Merchant Marine, Co., 
Ltd. and Evergreen America Corporation as parties to the agreement.

Agreement No.: 203-011330-011.
Title: Information System Agreement.
Parties:

    P&O Nedlloyd, Ltd.
    American President Lines, Ltd.
    Crowley Maritime Corporation
    A.P. Moller-Maersk Line
    Sea-Land Service, Inc.
    Hapag-Lloyd Container Linie GmbH
    Orient Overseas Container Line, Inc.
    Lykes Bros. Steamship Co., Inc.
    P&O Nedlloyd B.V.
    Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha
    Yang Ming Marine Transport Corp.
    Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd.

Synopsis: The proposed Agreement amends Article 6 of the Agreement to 
authorize the Chairman and Legal Counsel for the Agreement to execute 
and file amendments to Article 3 of the Agreement (Membership). It also 
amends Article 7 to authorize telephone, telex, telefax and electronic 
mail polls of the Executive Committee or the full membership and to 
provide procedures for such polls.

    Dated: March 11, 1997.

    By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission.
Joseph C. Polking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-6502 Filed 3-13-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
RESOLUTION DATED FEBRUARY 15, 1999
                       TO AMEND OUTSTANDING OPTION AWARDS
                              TO ADD RELOAD FEATURE


RESOLVED,  that,  effective  March  1,  1999,  certain outstanding non-qualified
options be, and they hereby are, amended to add the right to receive restoration
options  substantially  in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth on
Exhibit  #2;  provided  that,  in  the case of optionees whose option awards are
subject  to foreign law ("Foreign Options"), the co-Chief Executive Officers and
C. S. Sommer, and each of them, be, and they hereby are, authorized (i) to amend
such  Foreign  Options to add the right to receive restoration options effective
on  such  date  or dates on or after March 1, 1999 that they have determined, in
their  sole  discretion,  that  such  amendment  would not be detrimental to the
Company  or  to the optionee; and (ii) to impose such other terms and conditions
on  the  right to receive restoration options as they, in their sole discretion,
deem  necessary or advisable with respect to such Foreign Options, provided that
such  other terms and conditions do not change the number of options granted nor
enlarge  the  scope  of  the  terms  of  any  award;  and

FURTHER  RESOLVED,  that  the  co-Chief Executive Officers and C. S. Sommer, and
each  of  them,  is  authorized  to do any and all acts, and execute any and all
documents,  as they or any of them deem necessary or desirable to effectuate the
foregoing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           1,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,152
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      5,054
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,640
<PP&E>                                          59,785
<DEPRECIATION>                                  41,045
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  31,319
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,201
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           529
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,637
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    31,319
<SALES>                                         40,159
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                40,159
<CGS>                                           32,276
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   32,276
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,359
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 563
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,216
<INCOME-TAX>                                       614
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,602
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,602
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .67
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .67


</TABLE>
#### Andrea Dee HOLLOWAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Nancy A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner Social Security, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 15-35908

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 8, 2018 * Portland, Oregon

Filed March 12, 2018

Max Rae, Max Rae, Attorney, Salem, OR, for Plaintiff-Appellant

Jeffrey Eric Staples, Social Security Administration, Office of the General Counsel, Seattle, WA, Renata Gowie, DOJ-USAO, Portland, OR, for Defendant-Ap-pellee

Before: FISHER, N.R. SMITH and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Andrea Holloway appeals the district court’s judgment affirming the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying her applications for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, *see Berry v. Astrue,*622 F.3d 1228, 1231 (9th Cir. 2010), and we affirm.

1. The ALJ properly excluded conversion disorder or psychogenic dystonia. No “medically acceptable clinical and laboratory diagnostic techniques” resulted in a finding or diagnosis of this impairment. *See Ukolov v. Barnhart,*420 F.3d 1002, 1005 (9th Cir. 2005) (emphasis omitted); 42 U.S.C. § 423(d)(3).

2. The ALJ provided specific, clear and convincing reasons for discrediting Holloway’s testimony regarding the severity of her symptoms. *See Smolen v. Chater,*80 F.3d 1273, 1281 (9th Cir. 1996). Even assuming the ALJ erred by considering Holloway’s criminal history, *see*SSR 16-3p, 81 Fed. Reg. 14166, 14171, any error was harmless,

3. The ALJ provided specific, legitimate reasons that were supported by substantial evidence for discrediting Dr. Dieter’s opinion. *See Bayliss v. Barnhart,*427 F.3d 1211, 1216 (9th Cir. 2005); *Tommasetti v. Astrue,*533 F.3d 1035, 1041 (9th Cir. 2008) (“An ALJ may reject a treating physician’s opinion if it is based ‘to a large extent’ on a claimant's self-reports that have been properly discounted as incredible.”) (citation omitted).

4. The ALJ provided germane reasons for discrediting the testimony of Thomas Miller, Holloway’s boyfriend, because his testimony was inconsistent with the medical record. *See Bayliss,*427 F.3d at 1218.

5. The ALJ’s finding that jobs exist in significant numbers that Holloway could perform was supported by substantial evidence. *See Smolen,*80 F.3d at 1279. The ALJ was permitted to rely on the job testimony offered by the vocational expert. *773*See Johnson v. Shalala,*60 F.3d 1428, 1435 (9th Cir. 1995).1

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

1

. In light of our disposition, we need not address Holloway's remaining contentions regarding her 2008 applications.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000818674
<NAME> INTELLICALL, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           3,899
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,422
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,771)
<INVENTORY>                                      2,401
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,203
<PP&E>                                           8,341
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (7,741)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,640
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,012
<BONDS>                                          1,745
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           131
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,681
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,640
<SALES>                                          1,253
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,253
<CGS>                                            1,060
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,060
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,394
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   654
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 125
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,871)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,349
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (522)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   (117)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (639)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.05)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<PAGE>




<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND FROM THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         149,582
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   68,486
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,067
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                       1,156,659
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F2>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,717,051
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                      3,827,844
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,467,067)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,717,051
<SALES>                                        623,807
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               625,971
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  360,366
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             270,329
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (116,141)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (116,141)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (116,141)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>THE PARTNERSHIP HAS AN UNCLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET; THEREFORE, THE VALUE
IS $0.
<F2>THIS INFORMATION IS NOT DISCLOSED IN THE PARTNERSHIP'S FORM 10-Q FILING.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
No. 12-69.

#### Jones *v.*University of Hawaii et al.

Int. Ct. App. Haw. Certiorari denied.
Order entered February 9, 2023

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-01296-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.M.S., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 470th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 470-56640-2021

ORDER

Before the Court is the February 3, 2023 request of Tanner Joy Feast, 

Official Court Reporter for the 470th Judicial District Court, for a forty-five day 

extension to file the reporter’s record. We GRANT the request only to the extent

that we extend the deadline to March 8, 2023.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG

JUSTICE
Exhibit
21.2





Puget
Sound Energy, Inc.





SUBSIDIARIES





1.
            Hydro
      Energy Development Corporation
(HEDC)


10885
N.E. Fourth Street, Suite 1200


Bellevue,
Washington 98004-5515





2.
            Puget
      Western, Inc.


19515
North Creek Parkway


Suite
310


Bothell,
Washington 98011





3.
            WNG
      CAP I, Inc.


10885
N.E. Fourth Street, Suite 1200


Bellevue,
Washington 98004-5515





4.
            PSE
      Funding, Inc.


10885
N.E. Fourth Street, Suite 1200


Bellevue,
Washington 98004-5515
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                              READ-RITE CORPORATION
              STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                     (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                         THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                             DECEMBER 31,
                                                      ------------------------
                                                         1996           1995
                                                      ----------    ----------
                                                             (UNAUDITED)

<S>                                                   <C>           <C>       
Net income                                            $    5,787    $   42,571
                                                      ==========    ==========

Weighted average common shares
   outstanding                                            46,976        47,117
Common equivalent shares
   issuable under dilutive stock
   options after applying treasury
   stock method, net of tax benefits                       1,122         1,472
                                                      ----------    ----------

Common and common equivalent
 shares used in computing net
 income per share                                         48,098        48,589
                                                      ==========    ==========

Net income per share                                  $     0.12    $     0.88
                                                      ==========    ==========
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant
to Section 906

Of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned
officers of Rand Capital Corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 (the Form10-K) of the Company fully complies with the
requirement of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |                                                   
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 10, 2016 |  | 
|                      |  | 
|                      |  |  |  | LOGO                                              
|                      |  |  |  | Allen F. Grum, President
(Chief Executive Officer)



|                      |  |  |  |                                                         
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 10, 2016 |  | 
|                      |  | 
|                      |  |  |  | LOGO                                                    
|                      |  |  |  | Daniel P. Penberthy, Treasurer (Chief Financial Officer)



74
|
|

|Energy Market and Economic Impacts of H.R. 2454, the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009                                                          
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Figure 13. Generation by Fuel in ACESA Main Cases, 2030 (billion kilowatthours).  Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800).
|Figure 13. Generation by Fuel in ACESA Main Cases, 2030 (billion kilowatthours).  Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800).
|Figure 13. Generation by Fuel in ACESA Main Cases, 2030 (billion kilowatthours).  Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800).
Pennoni Associates

One Drexel Plaza 3001 Market St Suite 200 Philadelphia, PA 19104 215
- 222
- 3000
Pennoni Associates would like to file for exemption for FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, Public Law, 112

- 95 FEB 14, 2012, Section 333.
Pennoni would like to use small UASs for various site inspection, survey and site collection, corporate communications. All UASs will be well under 50 pounds including all equipment.
Regarding the UAS:

1. We intend on using small multi

- rotor “drones” (li ke DJI Phantom 2 or Inspire v1 , 3DR Isis ) to survey various engineering projects the firm oversees. These drones will be used for mapping, surveying, 3D modeling and for corporate communications as public relations shots of projects. 2. The UAS will be opera ted by no less than two on the ground operators, pilot and spotters, and only during the day and in VLOS conditions under 2 00 feet. 3. Pre
-flight inspection includes balance of motors and props, visual inspection of mechanical systems for camera gimbals, repl acement of motors that have run for a pre

- demined end of life duration regardless of visual wear, replacement of any rotating part that appears out of calibration, unbalanced or otherwise excessively worn. 4. Pre
-flight inspection also includes review of electronic flight controls, software for flight plan, battery inspections and replacement. None of our UASs will go in the air unless the pre

-flight check is 100% completed. 5. Radio Frequency for flight controls used will be the standard hobbyist 2.4 Ghz in com pliance with FCC. Telemetry will run on 915Mhz. 6. Operations of UAV will be as follows: VLOS will always be used, flights will be less than 10 mins long, and flight areas are mostly construction sites and bridges for inspection. These are not populated ar eas and therefore don’t represent a danger to the public. The UASs we use all have flight controls that land if there is an emergency or if there is a loss of signal between the operator and the UAS. From the air it is our intention to gather film and vi deo for our projects and clients that require 3D mapping. 7. PIC will be me (Kevin Kissinger) . And I’m willing to get any certifications I need to be legal. I have several hundred hours in the hobby already and I always stress safety over anything else.8. Max operating range would be much less than a half mile, altitude would never exceed 400 feet.

Operations within two miles of an airport or flight path will be prohibited. Max speed about 20 knots. 9. VLOS standard will be enforced by not flying behind buildi ngs, trees or other objects interfering with direct line of site. Secondary spotters will also be utilized as eyes on the ground. 10. Preflight safety checks will include (but not be limited to) visual inspection of all electronics, battery condition, mechani cal parts including the motors and props, ensuring all connections are double and triple checked connectivity and performance. If anything is broken, unbalanced or otherwise not 100 % correct , the flight will be grounded until it’s repaired.
No. 12-94.

#### Chien *v.*Skystar Bio Pharmaceutical Co. et al.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.