alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 99(b)


            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


         I,   M. Michael Owens, Chief Financial Officer of United States Lime &
         Minerals, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify that to my knowledge:


         (3)  The Company's periodic report on Form 10-K for the year ended
              December 31, 2002 (the "Form 10-K") fully complies with the
              requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
              Act of 1934, as amended; and


         (1)  The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.


Dated:   March 27, 2003                             /s/ M. Michael Owens
                                                    --------------------
                                                    M. Michael Owens
EX-10.5





 Certain identified information has been excluded from this exhibit because it is both not material and
is the type that the registrant treats as private or confidential. Information that was omitted has been noted in this document with a placeholder identified by the mark “[***]”. 

 
 Exhibit 10.5 

AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO SALE AND ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT 

This Amendment No. 2 to Sale and Assignment Agreement (this “Agreement”), is in effect as of the Effective Date of the Sale and
Assignment Agreement, and is by and between ProMab Biotechnologies, Inc., having an address at 2600 Hilltop Drive, Richmond, CA 94806 (“ProMab”), and Caribou Biosciences, Inc., having a place of business at 2929 7th Street, Suite 105,
Berkeley, CA 94710 USA (“Caribou”). Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Sale and Assignment Agreement, having an Effective Date of January 31, 2020, as amended by Amendment No. 1 to Sale and
Assignment Agreement (collectively, the “Agreement”). 
 WHEREAS, the Parties entered into the Agreement, wherein Caribou
took assignment of all right, title, and interest in PMC 306 and the Assigned Patent Rights; 
 WHEREAS, the Parties would like to clarify a certain
section as set forth herein; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, terms, and conditions set forth herein, and
for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereto agree as follows: 

1. Section 3.2(a) is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following Section 3.2(a): 

[***] 
 [***] 

 

					
	[***]	  	[***]
	[***]	  	[***]
	[***] [***]	  	[***]

 [***] 
 2.
Except as explicitly amended above, all other terms of the Agreement remain in full force and effect, and the Parties hereby ratify the Agreement as amended herein. 

3. This Amendment No. 2 to Sales and Assignment Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, including facsimile or scanned
PDF documents. Each such counterpart, facsimile or scanned PDF document shall be deemed an original instrument, and all of which, together, shall constitute one and the same executed document. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment No. 2 to Sale and Assignment Agreement by their duly authorized
representatives of the Effective Date set forth above. 
  

									
	ProMab Biotechnologies, Inc.	 		 	Caribou Biosciences, Inc.
					
	By:	 	 /s/ John Wu
	 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Rachel E. Haurwitz

	By:	 	John Wu, Ph.D.	 		 	Name:	 	Rachel E. Haurwitz, Ph.D.
	Title:	 	Chief Executive Officer	 		 	Title:	 	President & Chief Executive Officer
##### 



Exhibit 10.24
 AMENDMENT TO  SEPARATION AND GENERAL RELEASE AGREEMENT
         Cash Equivalent RSU Award




---



##### 








---



##### 



ARCHSTONE-SMITH TRUSTDate:
    
    8/22/07
    
    
    
    
    
    By:
    
    /s/ R. Scott SellersName: R. Scott SellersTitle: CEOARCHSTONE-SMITH OPERATING TRUSTDate:
    
    8/22/07
    
    
    
    
    
    By:
    
    /s/ R. Scott SellersName: R. Scott SellersTitle: CEOJ. LINDSAY FREEMANDate:
    
    8/22/07
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    /s/ J. Lindsay Freeman
No. 12-153.

#### Driscoll et ux. *v.*Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# School Discipline

- U.S. Departments of Education and Justice Release Resource on Confronting Racial Discrimination in Student Discipline Today, the U.S. Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights (OCR) and the U.S.
- U.S. Department of Education Issues Dear Colleague Letter Calling for End to Corporal Punishment in Schools and Guiding Principles on School Discipline Today, U.S. Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona wrote to Governors, Chief State School Officers, and School District and School Leaders and urged them to end corporal punishment in schools—the practice of paddling, spanking, or otherwise imposing physical punishmenton students.
- U.S. Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights Reaches Settlement with Victor Valley Union High School District in California The U.S. Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights (OCR) today announced that the Victor Valley Union High School District in California has entered into a resolution agreement to end race discrimination in implementation of school discipline.
- U.S. Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights Seeks Information on the Nondiscriminatory Administration of School Discipline The U.S. Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights (OCR) today issued a Request for Information asking members of the public to submit written comments on the administration of school discipline in schools serving students in pre-k through grade 12. This information will assist OCR in determining what policy guidance, technical assistance, or other resources may help schools improve school climate and safety, and ensure equal access to education programs and activities, consistent with the civil rights laws that OCR enforces.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                                 PUBLICARD, INC.
                            AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements on Form
S-3 File Nos., 333-80447, 333-87597, 333-89917, 333-33788 and 333-53204 and
Registration Statements on Form S-8 File Nos. 33-88876, 333-72411, 333-43466 and
333-43468 of PubliCARD, Inc. of our report dated March 24, 2003, relating to the
consolidated financial statements of PubliCARD, Inc. as of and for the year
ended December 31, 2002 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and
includes explanatory paragraphs relating to the Company's ability to continue as
a going concern and the application of procedures performed in regards to
certain disclosures in the 2001 and 2000 financial statements that were audited
by other auditors who have ceased operations and for which we have expressed no
opinion or other form of assurance other than with respect to such disclosures)
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of PubliCARD, Inc. for the year
ended December 31, 2002.

/s/Deloitte & Touche LLP

New York, New York
March 24, 2003
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 42 (Tuesday, March 4, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 9801]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5215]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Notice of Intent to Repatriate Cultural Items in the Possession 
of the Arizona State Museum, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ


AGENCY: National Park Service

ACTION: Notice

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Notice is hereby given under the Native American Graves Protection 
and Repatriation Act, 25 U.S.C. 3005 (a)(2), of the intent to 
repatriate cultural items in the possession of the Arizona State 
Museum, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, which meet the definition of 
``sacred object'' under Section 2 of the Act.
    The cultural items are two Hopi spirit friends or katsina masks 
worn in Katsina dances. The spirit friends are known as Niman and 
Heheya.
    In 1929, the spirit friend Niman was donated to the Arizona State 
Museum by an anonymous donor. The museum's accession information states 
this spirit friend was collected from the Hopi Pueblos. In 1964, the 
spirit friend Heheya was donated to the Arizona State Museum by the 
Arizona Pioneers Historical Society. The cultural affiliation of these 
cultural items is clearly Hopi as documented in museum records and 
verified by the Katsinmomngwit (traditional religious leaders) of the 
Hopi Tribe. During consultation, the Katsinmomngwit and representatives 
of the Hopi Tribe identified these two katsina masks as specific 
ceremonial objects which are needed by traditional religious leaders 
for the practice of the Hopi religion by present-day adherents.
    Based on the above-mentioned information, officials of the Arizona 
State Museum have determined that, pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001 (3)(C), 
these two cultural items are specific ceremonial objects needed by 
traditional Native American religious leaders for the practice of 
traditional Native American religions by their present-day adherents. 
Officials of the Arizona State Museum have also determined that, 
pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001 (2), there is a relationship of shared group 
identity which can be reasonably traced between these cultural items 
and the Hopi Tribe.
    This notice has been sent to officials of the Hopi Tribe and the 
Pueblo of Zuni. Representatives of any other Indian tribe that believes 
itself to be culturally affiliated with these objects should contact 
Nancy Odegaard, Acting Curator of Collections, Arizona State Museum, 
University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, telephone (520) 621-6314 
before April 3, 1997. Repatriation of these objects to the Hopi Tribe 
may begin after that date if no additional claimants come forward.
Dated: February 24, 1997.
Francis P. McManamon,
Departmental Consulting Archeologist,
    Manager, Archeology and Ethnography Program.
[FR Doc. 97-5215 Filed 3-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE BILLING CODE 4310-70-F
<PAGE>
                                                                     Exhibit 3.5

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                         MISSION RESOURCES CORPORATION

     Mission Resources Corporation, a corporation organized and existing under
the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the "Corporation"), does
hereby certify:

     The amendments to the Corporation's Certificate of Incorporation set forth
in the following resolution approved by the Corporation's Board of Directors and
stockholders were duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242
of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware:

     "RESOLVED, that the introductory paragraph of Article Four of the Company's
Certificate of Incorporation is hereby amended in its entirety so that, as
amended, it shall be and read as follows, with the remainder of Article Four to
remain unamended:

          The Corporation shall have authority to issue two classes of stock,
     and the total number authorized shall be sixty million (60,000,000) shares
     of Common Stock of the par value of one cent ($.01) each, and five million
     (5,000,000) shares of Preferred Stock of the par value of one cent ($.01)
     each. A description of the different classes of stock of the Corporation
     and a statement of the designations and the powers, preferences and rights,
     and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof, in respect of
     each class of such stock are as follows:"

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Mission Resources Corporation has caused this
Certificate to be signed and attested by its duly authorized officers, this 16th
day of May, 2001.

                                          MISSION RESOURCES CORPORATION


                                          By: /s/ Douglass Manner
                                             ----------------------------------
                                             Douglass Manner, Chief Executive
                                             Officer


Attest:


/s/ Roland E. Sledge
----------------------------
Roland E. Sledge, Secretary
ex10a.htm
















Exhibit 10(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 21 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-141756) pertaining to Lincoln Life & Annuity Variable Annuity Account H, which is incorporated by reference into Post-Effective Amendment No. 20 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-141761) and Amendment No. 239 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-08441), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) April 1, 2014, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New York and (b) April 1, 2014, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life & Annuity Variable Annuity Account H for the registration of interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.













/s/ Ernst & Young LLP












Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


April 1, 2014
2022 EAVS Data Brief: Georgia EAVS Jurisdictions:

159 

 Voter Registration 

Active Reg. Voters as of Nov. 8, 20221 

6,955,386 

Reg. Forms Received2* 

3,232,104 

Total Confirmation Notices Sent3* 

1,135,472 

Voters Removed from Reg. Rolls4* 

483,386 

Source of Registration Applications5 

Motor Vehicle Dept. 66.5% 

Mail, Email, Fax 17.0% 

Online 11.9% 

In Person 2.7% 

Other 1.9% 

 Voting and Turnout 

Voters Participating By Mode6 

7 Turnout 

50.9% 

In-Person 

Election Day 

1,420,392 

35.8% 

Mail 

248,487 

6.3% 

In-Person 

Early 

2,290,459 

57.8% 

Other 

3,814 

0.1% 

Total Voting Locations8: 2,763 

Total Poll Workers9: 18,439 

Election Technology 

Percentage of Jurisdictions Using...10 

100.0% 

Ballot 

Marking 

Devices 

100.0% 

Electronic 

Poll 

Books 

100.0% 

Scanners 

0.0% 

DREs w/o 

VVPAT 

0.0% 

DREs with 

VVPAT 

0.0% 

Hand 

Counting 

 Mail Ballots 

• 280,897 mail ballots transmitted11 

• 89.8% of transmitted mail ballots returned by voters12 

• 98.5% of returned mail ballots counted13 

• 1.5% of returned mail ballots rejected14 

• Did not conduct all-mail election15 

• Allowed drop boxes16 

• Allowed ballot curing17 

 Election Audits18 

-- Access audit 

-- Ballot design audit 

✔ Ballot reconciliation 

audit 

-- Compliance/ 

procedural audit 

-- Eligibility audit 

-- Legal audit 

✔ Logic and accuracy 

testing 

✔ Post-election 

tabulation audit 

-- Other 

Notes 

EAVS data and reports may be downloaded at www.eac.gov 

/research-and-data/datasets-codebooks-and-surveys. 

Responses of “Does not apply,” “Data not available,” and “Valid 

skip” are shown as zeroes or dashes. Percentages may not sum 

to 100% because of missing data or rounding. 

* Close of registration for 2020 

general election to close of 

registration for 2022 general 

election. 

1 A1b of EAVS. 

2 A3a of EAVS. 

3 A8a of EAVS. 

4 A9a of EAVS. 

5 Mail, Email, Fax is A4a/A3a. 

In Person is A4b/A3a. Online is 

A4c/A3a. Motor Vehicle Dept. is 

A4d/A3a. Other is the sum of 

A4e–A4l/A3a. May not sum to 

100% because of missing data. 

6 In-Person Election Day is F1b. 

Mail is F1d+F1g. In-Person Early 

is F1f. Other is F1c+F1e+F1h. 

7 F1a of EAVS divided by citizen 

voting age population (CVAP). 

8 D2a of EAVS. 

9 D7a of EAVS. 

10 F3a–f, F5a–F9a of EAVS; 

number of jurisdictions that 

responded “Yes” divided by

number of jurisdictions in 

state/territory. 

11 C1a of EAVS. 

12 C1b/C1a of EAVS. 

13 C8a/C1b of EAVS. 

14 C9a/C1b of EAVS. 

15 Q17 and Q17a of Policy 

Survey. 

16 Q19 of Policy Survey. 

17 Q20 of Policy Survey. 

18 Q36 of Policy Survey. See 

survey questionnaire for full 

definitions of each type of 

audit.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  UT
<CIK>  0000081027
<NAME>  PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF OKLAHOMA
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                           DEC-31-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                              PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                                1,308,586
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                                 20,764
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      84,149
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                                     2,755
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                              31,427
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           1,447,681
<COMMON>                                                   157,230
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                                  180,000
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                                        136,996
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                             474,226
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                  5,287
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                                       456,821
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                           4,874
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                                   40,000
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                                    0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                                        0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                                      0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                                 0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                             466,473
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                            1,447,681
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                                  712,690
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                                        20,763
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                                 610,151
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                                 630,914
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                                     81,776
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                           1,649
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                              83,425
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    37,219
<NET-INCOME>                                                46,206
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                                    364
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                               50,053
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                                    59,000
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                                   28,044
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                                     121,654
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                 0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 0.00
        





</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of Duke Energy Indiana, Inc. (Duke Energy Indiana) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Lynn J. Good,
Chief Financial Officer of Duke Energy Indiana, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Duke Energy Indiana.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 12, 2010



/s/    LYNN J. GOODLynn J. GoodChief Financial Officer
# C_2022213EN.01002401.xml

| 30.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 213/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 213/24

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia de Cartagena (Spain) lodged on 8 February 2022 — RTG v Tuk Travel, S.L.

(Case C-83/22)

(2022/C 213/33)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Juzgado de Primera Instancia No 5 de Cartagena

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: RTG

Defendant: Tuk Travel, S.L.

Questions referred

| 1. | Must Articles 169(1) and (2)(a) TFEU and 114(3) TFEU be interpreted as precluding Article 5 of Directive 2015/2302 (1) on package travel and linked travel arrangements, since that article does not include, among the compulsory precontractual information to be provided to travellers, the right, conferred on travellers by Article 12 of the directive, to terminate the contract before the start of the package and obtain a full refund of payments made in the event of unavoidable and extraordinary circumstances which significantly affect the performance of the package? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Must Articles 169(1) and (2)(a) TFEU and 114(3) TFEU be interpreted as precluding Article 5 of Directive 2015/2302 (1) on package travel and linked travel arrangements, since that article does not include, among the compulsory precontractual information to be provided to travellers, the right, conferred on travellers by Article 12 of the directive, to terminate the contract before the start of the package and obtain a full refund of payments made in the event of unavoidable and extraordinary circumstances which significantly affect the performance of the package?

| 2. | Do Articles 114 and 169 TFEU, and Article 15 of Directive 2015/2302, preclude the application of the principles of the delimitation of the subject matter of an action by the parties and of the correlation between the claims put forward in the action and the rulings contained in the operative part, which are laid down in Articles 216 and 218(1) LEC [Ley de Enjuiciamiento Civil (Law on Civil Procedure)], where those procedural principles are liable to impede the full protection of the applicant consumer? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Do Articles 114 and 169 TFEU, and Article 15 of Directive 2015/2302, preclude the application of the principles of the delimitation of the subject matter of an action by the parties and of the correlation between the claims put forward in the action and the rulings contained in the operative part, which are laid down in Articles 216 and 218(1) LEC [Ley de Enjuiciamiento Civil (Law on Civil Procedure)], where those procedural principles are liable to impede the full protection of the applicant consumer?

---

(1)  Directive (EU) 2015/2302 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2015 on package travel and linked travel arrangements, amending Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 and Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 90/314/EEC (OJ 2015 L 326, p. 1).

---