alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Great lakes Airlines 

ATIN: Customer Relations 

.')'lJ•• 

L~IJ ,,::;,~ l ~ .,, ... ..) 

1022 Airport Parkway, Cheyenne, WV 

October 20, 2014 

Dear Customer Service, 

On Sept. 25, 2014 I flew from Page AZ to Denver CO. to attend a Memorial for my dear grandson who 

has died unexpectedly. The flight to Denver was normal and arrived there without incident. However, 

the return flight on Sept. 28,2014 was totally opposite: 

First let me say I had major surgery on my right hip three months before and was not able to use stairs, 

the help or mostly the Fire Dept. was there to take me up and down the stairs in a special chair I was 

belted in and they did a great job II However, before we were in flight it was discovered the pilots could 

not communicate with each other. A crew came aboard and supposedly repaired the jack. which was 

not the result and after going to the take-off runway. returned to the terminal where we were told to 

deplane to another plane. After being in the air in clouds and above the clouds in some instants we 

were told there were some mechanical failures with the plane and we were landing in·F~rmington, New 

Mexico for repairs-We deplaned again-down the stairs in the special chair with two firemen holding 

on to me & the chair-they did a great job-they didn't drop me II After 45 minutes we were told to 

board another plane as they were unable to repair the original aircraft. We were now more than three 

hours late for arrival time in Page. There was no heat in this plane all the way from Farmington to Page 

AZ. By the time we landed in Page I was terribly cold as well as being stressed- out for the delays, I was 

neariy frozen for lack of heat in the passenger area. Besides myself there were six other passengers and 

they were very cold also II The plane arrived in Page nearly six hours late~ 

I do believe because of the circumstances I have reiterated above Great lakes Airlines should reimburse 

me the airfare I paid for the trip •. The trip was a nightmare: deplaning and boarding several times up 

3nd down the stairways, freezing in the passenger area and arriving in Page very late-each are a 

qualified reason for being reimbursed • I have been quite ill since this trip and that is why I have not 

filed this complaint earlier. 

I have enclosed a copy of my itinerary. 

Sincerely, 

Allee loshbough · 

-

Page,AZ--
No. 11-10938.

#### Owens *v.*United States.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS


Wright & Company, Inc. (Wright) hereby consents to the use of our reports dated
November 24, 1998, entitled "Evaluation and Review of Oil and Gas Reserves to
the Interests of Resource Energy, Inc. and Atlas America, Inc., in Certain
Properties Located in Various States, Job 8.463" and November 15, 1999,
entitled "SUMMARY REPORT, Evaluation of Oil and Gas Reserves to the Interests
of Resource America, Inc. in Certain Properties Located in Various States,
Pursuant to the Requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission,
Effective September 30, 1999, Job 9.510" in Resource America, Inc.'s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended September 30, 1999.


                                           Wright & Company, Inc.


                                           By: /s/ D. Randall Wright
                                               ------------------------------
                                               D. Randall Wright
                                               President

December 29, 1999
Brentwood, Tennessee
No. 11-10891.

#### Savell *v.*Mississippi.

Sup. Ct. Miss. Certio-rari denied.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                         BITSTREAM INC AND SUBSIDIARIES
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                       3 MOS             3 MOS
                                                       ENDED             ENDED
                                                      3/31/96           3/31/97
                                                     ----------       ----------
<S>                                                  <C>              <C>       
Preferred Stock, Convertible                          3,173,737            --
Common Stock - Class A                                  281,813        5,496,691
Common Stock - Class B Convertible                       30,864          422,026
                                                      ---------        ---------
Weighted average common shares
   outstanding during
   the period                                         3,486,414        5,918,717

Dilutive effect of common stock options               1,249,357        1,026,673
   and warrants

Weighted average common and common
   equivalent
   shares outstanding                                 4,735,771        6,945,390

Net income adjusted for assumed
   interest expense
   savings and incremental interest                  $  605,680       $  241,593
   income

Net income per common and common                     $     0.13       $     0.03
   equivalent share

</TABLE>


Page 12 of 13
No. 11-10328.

#### Carruthers *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-10792.

#### Wilke *v.*United States.

C. A. 2d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Exhibit 10.22

                     AMENDMENT TO READING & BATES CORPORATION
                              STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT


         This Amendment to the Stock  Option Agreement between Reading & Bates
   Corporation ("Company")  and Paul B. Loyd,  Jr. ("Optionee") is made  as of
   December 3, 1996.


                                   WITNESSETH:

         WHEREAS, the Compensation  Committee which administers the  Reading &
   Bates Corporation  1995 Long  Term Incentive  Plan ("Plan")  has determined
   that it is in the best  interests of the Company to amend the  Stock Option
   Agreement executed on March 22, 1996, effective  as of December 5, 1995, in
   the manner set out below, and Optionee has agreed to same;

         NOW  THEREFORE, for  and in  consideration of  these premises,  it is
   hereby agreed as follows:

         Paragraph 3 of the Agreement is amended,  effective as of the date of
         this Amendment, to read as follows:

               "3.   This Option  shall not  be exercisable,  except upon  the
               death  or disability  of the  Optionee, until after  six months
               immediately  following the  date this  Option  is granted,  and
               thereafter shall be exercisable for common stock as follows:

                     After one  year following  the effective  date of  grant,
                     this  Option shall be exercised  for any number of shares
                     up  to and  including  100% of  the  aggregate number  of
                     shares subject to this Option;

               provided the number  of shares as to which  this Option becomes
               exercisable shall,  in each case,  be reduced by the  number of
               shares theretofore purchased pursuant to the terms hereof."

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment is executed this      day of      
             , 1997, effective as of the 3rd day of December, 1996.

                                       READING & BATES CORPORATION


                                 By:   __________________________
                                       T. W. Nagle
                                       Executive Vice President,
                                       Finance and Administration


                                       OPTIONEE

                                       __________________________
                                       Paul B. Loyd, Jr.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 23
----------

      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statement of PGI Incorporated and subsidiaries on Form S-8 (File
2-77149) of our report dated March 17, 2000, relating to the
consolidated financial statements and financial statements schedule
of PGI Incorporated and subsidiaries which report is included in
this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB.  Our report contains an
explanatory paragraph regarding uncertainty as to the ability of
the Company to continue as a going concern.

St. Louis, Missouri                         /s/ BDO Seidman, LLP
April 10, 2000
No. 11-10716.

#### Curvan *v.*Trombley, Warden.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 21



SUBSIDIARIES
--------------------

1.  Puget Western, Inc.
    19515 North Creek Parkway
    Suite 310
    Bothell, Washington 98011

2.  Puget Sound Energy Company
    P.O. Box 97034
    Bellevue, Washington 98009-9734

3.  ConnexT
    1301 Fifth Avenue
    Suite 1900
    Seattle, WA  98101

4.  Puget Energy, Inc.
    411 108th Avenue N.E.
    Bellevue, WA  98004-5515

5.  Hydro Energy Development Corporation
    19515 North Creek Parkway
    Suite 310
    Bothell, Washington 98011
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 49 (Thursday, March 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 11894]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6401]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS EXAMINATION COUNCIL


Interagency Policy Statement Regarding Disclosure of Statutory 
Enforcement Actions

AGENCIES: Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC); Board of 
Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FRB); Federal Deposit 
Insurance Corporation (FDIC); Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS); 
National Credit Union Administration (NCUA).

ACTION: Withdrawal of statement of policy.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The OCC, FRB, FDIC, OTS and NCUA (the Agencies) are 
withdrawing their joint statement of policy entitled ``Disclosure of 
Statutory Enforcement Actions'' (the Statement), set forth at 45 FR 
6648 (January 29, 1980), on the ground that it is obsolete.

EFFECTIVE DATE: The removal of the Statement of Policy is effective 
March 13, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

OCC: Daniel P. Stipano (202/874-4800), Director, Enforcement and 
Compliance Division, 250 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20219
FRB: Ann Marie Kohlligian (202/452-3528), Senior Counsel, 20th & C 
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20551
FDIC: Andrea Gribble (202/736-3047), Senior Counsel, 550 l7th Street, 
NW., Washington, DC 20429
OTS: Richard C. Stearns (202/906-7966), Deputy Chief Counsel for 
Enforcement, Office of Thrift Supervision, 1700 G Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20552
NCUA: John Ianno (703/518-6540), Trial Attorney, 1775 Duke Street, 
Alexandria, VA 22314-3428.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Statement of Policy set forth the 
circumstances in which each of the Agencies would disclose to the 
public information concerning or relating to statutory enforcement 
proceedings brought against regulated institutions or other persons 
subject to the Agencies' enforcement authority. The statement has 
become obsolete. The statement was superseded by Section 913 of the 
Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 
(FIRREA), 12 U.S.C. 1818(u) (1989), which took effect on August 9, 
1989. Section 913 establishes statutory standards for the public 
disclosure of enforcement actions by the Agencies.

AGENCIES ACTION: The Agencies hereby withdraw the Statement.

    Dated at Washington, DC, this 10th day of March, 1997.

Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council
Keith J. Todd,
Assistant Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-6401 Filed 3-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODES 6210-01-P, 6720-01-P, 6714-01-P, 4810-33-P, 7535-01-P
# C_2022284EN.01004302.xml

| 25.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 284/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 284/43

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 3 June 2022 — Mariani v Parliament

(Case T-196/22 R)

(Interim measures - Institutional law - Member of Parliament - Exclusion from taking part in election observation delegations of the Parliament - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency)

(2022/C 284/59)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Thierry Mariani (Paris, France) (represented by: F.-P. Vos, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: N. Görlitz and T. Lukácsi, acting as Agents)

Re:

By his application of 14 April 2022 based on Articles 278 and 279 TFEU, the applicant seeks suspension of operation of decision D-301939 of the co-chairs of the Democracy Support and Election Coordination Group of 3 March 2022, which excluded him from taking part in election observation delegations of the European Parliament until the end of his parliamentary mandate (2019-2024).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0000818029
<NAME>                        International Precious Metals Corporation

<CURRENCY>                    Canadian dollar
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                0.7222
<CASH>                                          6,309,000
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           0
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                7,938,000
<PP&E>                                          1,312,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 23,059,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             714,000
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                       16,586,090
<OTHER-SE>                                              0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   23,059,000
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        0
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     840,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (804,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (804,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (804,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          (0.05)
        


</TABLE>
# rflexrpd.0909a
#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Nicholas EDWARDS, Petitioner

No. 406 EAL 2017

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

January 9, 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 9th day of January, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.
No. 11-11026.

#### Garza *v.*United States.

C. A. 7th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
No. 11-10815.

#### Shehata *v.*Cate, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of DataJungle Software Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:



The Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the Form 10-KSB) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-KSB.



|Dated: March 30, 2006 |  | /s/Larry Bruce
Larry Bruce
Chief Financial Officer, Secretary & Treasurer
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------



The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-KSB pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-B and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-KSB for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.





1
No. 11-10693.

#### Leonard *v.*Tucker, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 1st Dist. Cer-tiorari denied.
Submitted September 2,

reversed and remanded December 7, 2016

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Plaintiff-Respondent, v.*TRAVIS CHARLES WILSON, *Defendant-Appellant.*

Marion County Circuit Court

12C49583, 14C44145; A159196 (Control), A159197

385 P3d 1233

Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Ingrid A. MacFarlane, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant.

Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Jonathan N. Schildt, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Armstrong, Presiding Judge, and Tookey, Judge, and Shorr, Judge.

*718PER CURIAM

In these consolidated appeals, defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for felon in possession of a firearm in Case No. 14C44145 and a judgment revoking his probation in Case No. 12C49583. He assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his suppression motion in Case No. 14C44145 and its revocation of his probation in Case No. 12C49583 based on the conviction in Case No. 14C44145.

In Case No. 14C44145, defendant moved to suppress evidence that an Oregon State Police trooper discovered during a traffic stop, which led to the charge of felon in possession of a firearm, ORS 166.270.1 After the trial court denied the motion, defendant entered a conditional plea of guilty to that charge, reserving his right to appeal the trial court’s ruling on the suppression motion. *See*ORS 135.335(3). In Case No. 12C49583, defendant admitted to violating his probation based on his plea to the felon-in-possession charge in Case No. 14C44145, and the court revoked his probation. The state concedes that the trial court erred in denying defendant’s suppression motion and, consequently, that both judgments must be reversed and remanded. We agree, accept the state’s concession, and reverse and remand.

Reversed and remanded.

1

 A second charge, for possession of methamphetamine, ORS 475.894, was later dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             112
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   42,821
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,671
<INVENTORY>                                     42,235
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                87,998
<PP&E>                                          19,230
<DEPRECIATION>                                  36,533
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 112,383
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,442
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           760
<OTHER-SE>                                      38,512
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   112,383
<SALES>                                         98,281
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                98,281
<CGS>                                           80,539
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   80,539
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,101
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,775
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (791)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (348)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (443)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (443)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.06)
        

</TABLE>
|
|

|Energy Market and Economic Impacts of H.R. 2454, the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009                                                                                               
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Figure 36. Industrial and Employment Impacts in the ACESA Basic Case, 2012-2030 (percent change from reference case).  Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800).
|Figure 36. Industrial and Employment Impacts in the ACESA Basic Case, 2012-2030 (percent change from reference case).  Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800).
|Figure 36. Industrial and Employment Impacts in the ACESA Basic Case, 2012-2030 (percent change from reference case).  Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800).
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 22


                         Independent Auditors' Consent

The Board of Trustees
of Archstone Communities Trust:

    We consent to incorporation by reference in registration statements No. 333-
43723 (Form S-8), No. 333-60847 (Form S-8), No. 333-60815 (Form S-8), No. 333-
60817 (Form S-8), No. 333-49526 (Form S-3), No. 333-44639 (Form S-3), No. 333-
68591 (Form S-3), No. 333-77387 (Form S-3) and No. 333-51139 (Form S-4) of
Archstone Communities Trust of our reports dated January 30, 2001, except as to
Note 16 which is as of February 28, 2001, relating to the balance sheets of
Archstone Communities Trust as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related
statements of earnings, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2000, and the related
schedule, which reports appear in the December 31, 2000 Annual Report on Form
10-K of Archstone Communities Trust.


                                    KPMG LLP
Chicago, Illinois
March 9, 2001