### Debbie Rabin

- New CEMS regulation

- COMAR 26.11.01.11
From: To: 

### Date: Subject : "McL ai n , Steve" < SMclain @ pandamd.com > "Roland Gorschboth" <r g or schboth @ mde. s tate.md.us> 2/1 5/ 2 011 2 :20PM New C E MS re g ulatio n - CO MAR 26
. 11.01
. 11 Pag e 1 of 1



### Attachments: Ex ist i n g section 1 O
. pd f; Ex isti n g s ection ll
. pdf ; Old C E MS re g ulation re op a city data handling .pd f ; Proposed sec t ion 11.pd f

Hello Roland, We at Panda have noted that the MO E is makin g chan g es to COMAR in re g ard to C E M S and COMS re g ula ti ons. It appears that the pr i mary focus of the MO E has been on spl l tting the re quirements for the two different types of systems Into two separate sect ions

. The ori g inal ve rs ion of COMAR 26

. 11

. 01.10 applied to both opac i ty and emiss i on monitorin g systems
. In that version, under 26.11.01

. 10, G

. , (2), (a), it was specifically stated that "An opacity C EM shall automatically reduce all data to 6-minute block avera g es ... " S ince that time, sect i ons .10 and .11 were heav il y modified, w i th

. 10 becom i n g the body of re g ulations app li cable to COM systems, and

. 11 becom i n g those re g ulat i ons applicable to CEM systems
. In the ex i stin g (just pr i or to the latest COMAR chan g es to the section) version of COMAR 26.11

. 01.11, i

. e. those re g ulations applicable to 

### emi ssion s monitorin g s ystems, the only reference t o data reduct i on is under sect i on D., (2), which states that "A C EM

..shall record four equally space d dat a point s per hour and au t omatically reduce data in terms of avera g ing times consi st ent with the a pplicable emis s ion st andard." The requirement for 6- minute data reduction al g orithm was kept i n the exis ti n g v e rsion of 26.11.01.10, wh i ch a pplies to opacity monitor i ng systems, under D., (2), i .e . '6-minute avera g in g for 24 or more ... po i nts.' The most recent change to 26.11

. 01.11 

### (emission s systems) made by t he MOE adds a new section E. to
. 11, includ i ng an item (2), which adds a requirement f or the 6-minute averagin g of data , althou g h section 0.(2), referring to '4 equally spaced points' i s left unchan g ed. This appears to create a confl i ct. I have attached relevant highlighted port i ons of COMAR for your rev i ew. My CEMS vendor has expressed a doubt that the MO E intended the 6-minute averag i ng requirement to apply to CEM systems in addition to COM systems. Would you please confirm for me that the latest revision to 26

. 11.01.11 is indeed correct, i.e. that 6-minute avera gi n g is to be app l i ed to the data recorded by a Continuous 

### Emissions Monitoring S ystem? Panda is striving to comply as best i t ca n. Thank you, 

### Steven M
. McLain, P.E
. Plant En g ineer Panda Brandyw i ne, LP 1 6400 M atta w oman Dri v e Brandywine, Maryl a nd 2 0613 smcla i n @ p anqa,tnd

. com 301 - 78 2 -4000



### fil e : // C :\Docume nt s and S e tti n gs\drabin\Lo cal S e ttings \ Temp\XP grpwise\40 5 0411 AMD E
... 7 /2 8/2011

# . . ... 

# 0

# . . J 

### Page 1 of2

16.11
. 01.11

# e~ 

# \s-ri" 

# r-J"
. @=ontinuous

# iss**~~** Monitoring Requirements. 

# II

A. Applicability and Exemptions
.

(I) The provisions of th is regulat i on apply to : (a) Fuel-burning equipment burning coal that has a rated heat input capacity of 100 million 

### Btu per hour or greater ; (b) Municipal waste combustors with 

### a burning capacity 

### greater than 35 tons per day; (c) Fluidized bed combustors ; and (d) Kraft pulp mills. (2) An owner or operator that is required to install a CEM under any federal requirement is also subject to all of the provisions of this regulation
.

B. General Requirements for CEMs.

(I) An owner or operator subject to this regul a tion shall: (a) Before installing a CEM, submit to the Department, for approval by the Department and EPA, a plan cont a ining the CEM design specifications, proposed location, and a de scripti on ofa proposed alternative measurement method; and (b) Install and operate a CEM in accordance w i th the plan approved by the Department and EPA under the provisions of §B(l)(a) of this re gulation
. (2) The owner or operator of fuel-burnin g equipment burning coal, with a heat input capacity of I 00 million Btu per hour or greater, shall in s tall CEMs to measure and record sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide, either oxygen or carbon dioxide, and flow.(3) The owner or operator of: {a) A municipal waste combustor {MWC) shall install a CEM in accordance with the requirements in COMAR 26
. 11.08.07 or COMAR 26.11.08.08, as applicable ; (b) A Kraft pulp mill shall install a CEM to measure and record process total reduced sulfur in accordance with COMAR 26.11.14.05; and (c) A fluidized bed combustor of any size shall install CEMs to measure sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide and either oxygen or carbon dioxide. (4) Except as otherwise approved by the Department, ifthe owner or operator is unable to obtain emissions data from CEMs because of a malfunction of the CEM for more than 2 hours in duration, the owner or operator shall use the alternative measurement method approved 

### by the Department and EPA.

C. Quality Assurance for CEMs. A CEM used to monitor a gas concen tra tion shall meet the quality assurance criteria of40 CFR Part 60,**~ppendix** F, as amended, which is incorporated by ref erence, or, if applicable, the quality assurance criteria of 40 CFR Part 75, Appendix B, as amended.

## ~onitorin**g** a nd

## rmining Compliance. (1) General. A CEM required by this regulation is the pr i mary method used 

### by the Department to determine compliance


### http://www.dsd
. state.md.us/comar/comarhtml/26/26.11.01
. 1l
. htm 

### 2/15/2011

### Page 2 of2.

or non-compliance with the applicable emission standards established in any penn i t or approval, administrative or court order, Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity, or regulation in this subtitle
.

(3) Technical Memorandum. Except for fuel burning equipment subject to the COM requirements in COMAR 26.11.09.05, usc of COMs and CEMs for enforcement purposes shall be as specified in the Department's Air Management Administration Technical Memorandum 90-01 "Continuous Emission Monitoring (CEM) Policies and Procedures, " which is incorporated by reference
.

I I



### http://www.dsd
. state . md.us/comar/comarhtmV26126.ll.Ol.ll.htm 2/1512011 

# . 

# .

# · - .**~6.11.01.1** 

### 0 Page I of3
161.1.01.10 

# f" ')<.

# ,~,,**,J~** (3:ontinuous

# ~aeity Monitoring Requirements. 

# {0

A
. Applicability and Exceptions. (I) The provisions of this regulation apply to:

(a) Fuel burning equipment burning coaJ, fuel oil, tars, or waste combustible fluid at any time and that has a rated heat input capacity of2SO mill ion Btu per hour or greater ; (b) Fuel burning equ i pment burning coal with a rated heat input capacity of 100 million Btu per hour or greater but less than 2 .5 0 million Btu per hour and was constructed on or before June 19, 1984 ; (c) A cement kiln; (d) A fluidized bed combustor of any s ize; and (e) A municipal waste combustor with a burn i ng capacity greater than 35 tons per day. (2) The owner or operator of an installa ti on subject to this regulat ion may also be subject to the requirements of 40 CFR Parts 60 and 75, as amended
. (J) This re gulation does not apply to fuel burning equipment that:

(a) Bums only distillate fuel oil or a mixture of gas and distillate fuel oil ;

• . (b) Is able to comply with the applicable particulate matter and opacity emission limitations without us i ng particulate

- - matter contro l equipment ; and (c) Has never been found in a final order to be in violation of any visible emissions standard. (4) The owner or operator of fuel burning equipment subject to this regulation may. with approval by the Department, discontinue use ofa COM only in accordance with lhe provisions in COMAR 26.11.09.0SC.

B. General Requirements for COMs.

( 1) The owner or operator of an installation subject to this regulation shall:

(a) Install and continuously operate a COM that complies with a plan approved by the Department and EPA in accordance with §B(l)(b) ofthis regulation; and (b) Before installing a COM, submit to the Department for approval, a plan containing the COM design specifications, proposed location, and a description of a proposed alternative measurement method consisting ofa schedule for utilizing the EPA Reference Method 9 observational procedures
. (2) The Department shall submit the plan to EPA for review and approval. (3) A COM shall comply with the applicable requirements in 40 CFR Part 51. Appendix P, Sections 3.3-3.9, as amended, which is incorporated by reference. ( 4) The owner or operator of fuel burning equipment that is required by this regulation to install and operate a COM is subject to the provisions in COMAR 26.1 1.09.05
.

C. Certification and Quality Assurance Procedures
. 

### http://www.dsd.state
.md.uslcomar/comarhtml/26/26. I 1
. 0 1.1 O.htm 2115/2011

### 26.11.0 1.1 0 Page 2 of3,
(I) All certification testing, including certification performance tests and audits, shall be performed in accordance with 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix B, as amended, which is incorporated by reference. (2) For fuel burning equipment subject to the federal Acid Rain Program, all certification testing, including certification performance tests and audits, shall be performed in accordance with 40 CFR Part 75, Appendix A, as amended. (3) Certification testing shall be repeated when the Department determines that the data are invalid because of component replacement or other conditions that affect the accuracy of generated data
. (4) The owner or operator that is required to perfonn a certification performance test shall:

(a) At lellSt 60 dnys before the test, submit a test protocol to the Department for review and approval; (b) Schedule the test at a reasonable time and notify the Department nt least 10 days before the test is to be**conducted ~**  and (c) Submit the test results to the Department not later than 45 days after the completion ofthe test (5) Fuel burning equipment subject to the COM requ i rements in COMAR 26
. 11.09 shall meet the quality assurance procedures contained in Technical Memorandum 90-0l"Continuous Emission Monitoring (CEM) Policies and Procedures, " Part II Quality Assurance Requirements for Continuous Opacity Monitoring Systems. 

### @cord Koeping and Reporting Rcquiromenb. (l) System Downtime Reporting Requirements.

(a) All COM downtime that lasts or is expected to last more than 24 hours shall be reported to the Department by telephone before 10 a . m. of the first regular business day following the first day on which downtime occurs. (b) The COM downtime report shall include the reason, if known, for the breakdown and the estimated period of time that the COM will be down. The owner or operator shall notify the Department by teleph one when the COM has met performance specifications for accuracy, reliability, and durability of acceptable monitor ing systems, as provided in 40 CFR Part 51 Appendix P, and is producing data. (c) Except as otherw is e approved by the Department and the EPA, a COM shall operate in compliance with the requirements of §8(2) of this regulation and collect data for at least 95 percent of the so urce's operating time during any calendar quarter . The alternat ive measurement plan required in §B(l)(b) of this regul ation shall be used at all times when the COM f: confonn to performance standards required by §B(2) ofthis regulation during data collection
.

(b) All COM data shall be reported in a format approved by the Department. (c) A quarterly summary report shall be submitted to the Department not later than 30 days following each calendar quarter . The report shall be in a format approved by the Department, and shall include the follow i ng: (i) The cause, time periods, and the opac ity o f all emiss f ons which exceed the applicable quarterly, daily and hourly em iss i on standards as provided i n COMAR 26.11.09.05A(4); ( ii ) The COM an d installation dow n t imes, i n clud i n

g th e time and dat e of th e beginning and end of each downtim e period, and whether the downtime was scheduled ; (iii) The cause of all COM downtime ; 

### http://www
. dsd
. state . md
. us/comar/comarhtml/26/26.11
. 0 1
. 1 O.htm 2/15/2011 

# . . .

# .. : .**~**



### 2 6. 11 .01
. 10 operating procedures are be i ng utilized by source oper a tors to mai n tain emission levels at or below emiss i on standards. G. Record Keeping and Reporting Requirements.

(1) CEM System Downtime Reporting Requirements.

(a) All CEM system downtime that 

### lasts or is expected 

### to las t more than 24 hour s sh all 

### be reported to the 

### Dep artment by t el epho n e bef ore 10 a.m . of the first regul a r bu sine ss d ay followin g the breakdown. (b) 

### The system breakdown report required by § G(l)(a) of t his regulation shall include the reason, i f kn own, 

### for the bre akd own and the e s timated period oftime that the OEM will be down. The owner or opera tor of the CEM shall notify the D epartment 

### by tele p hone when an out-of-service OEM is back in operation and producin g val i d data.

_ 2)**ata** 

### Repq rti n g**Re en** **ts _**  

### ------- ....--- _ ( (a ) An 

### o a city OEM sha ll automati cally r e duce al l d a ta to \**S.mi ~**  

### blocJt av era ge s ca lcul ated fro m 3 6 o r m ore equ all y sp a ced 1 

### data pom t s . _ __ --------- __ 1

- (b) 

### ( test results shall be reported in a format approved by the Department. (c) Certification testing shall be 

### repeated when the Department determi nes that the OEM data m a y be i n v ali d because of component repl ace m ent or oth e r conditions that affect 

### the quality of generated data. (d) A quarterly summ a ry report s hall be submitted to the Departm ent n ot l ater than 30 days following e a ch calendar quarter. The report sh all b e in a fonn a t approved by the Department, and shall include the following: ' ( i ) The caus e , time periods, and m agnitude of all emi ss ions which exceed the ap p licable em ission stand ard s ; (ii) 

### The source downtime including the t ime and date of the beginning 

### and end of each downtime period and whet her the source downtime was planned or unplanned; ' ( Hi ) 

### The time period s and cau s e of all OEM downtime including records of a ny repa irs , a(ijustmente, or ma i n tenance that may a ff ect the vali dity o f em is ai on data; (iv} Quarterly totals of exce ss emi ss ions, installation 

### down

time , and OEM downtime during the calendar quarter ;
653-2 

### Supp
. ll

# ..

# , I 

## RICH AND HENDERSONt P.C.

TEL :(410) 267-5900 TOLL FREE: (800) 407-0250



### VIA U.S. MAIL AND EMAIL ATTORNEYS AT LAW 51 Franklin Street, Suite 300 P

. O. Box S89 Annapolis, Maryland 21404-0589



### February 15,2011

Deborah Rabin, Regulations Coordinator Air and Radiation Management Administration Maryland Department of the Environment 1800 Washington Boulevard, Suite 730 Baltimore, Mary land 21230 RE: Comments on Notice of Proposed Action FAX: (410)267-5901 E-MAIL. : thcnderson@richlaw.com



### Regarding Fuel Burning Equipment Using Continuous Opacity Monitors To Comply with Visibility and Opacity Standards Dear 

## Ms. Rabin: I am writing on behalf of Lehigh Portland Cement Company LLC ("Lehigh") regarding the Maryland Department of the Environment's (the "Department") Notice of Proposed Action to Amend Regulations .10 and .11 under COMAR 26.11.01, and Regulations .01 and .05 under COMAR 26.11.09, and to repeal and amend certain provisions of COMAR 26.11.31, which was published in the January 14,2011, Maryland Register. Md. Reg. Vol. 38, Issue 2, pp. 104-106, and 1

21-125. (collectively, the "Proposed Regulations"). Lehigh understands that the primary purpose of the proposed regulations is to adopt and incorporate the procedures for demonstrating compliance in the Department's Technical Memorandum 90-01 into the regulations governing visible emissions from facilities using continuous opacity monitoring ("COM") equipment. In general, Lehigh supports the Department's efforts. Lehigh, however, has concerns that the COM provisions in the Proposed Regulations create a potential conflict with the particulate monitoring and compliance requirements imposed on Lehigh's Union Bridge Plant by EPA's recent amendments to the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry and Standards of Performance for Portland Cement Plants. 75 Fed. Reg. 54970 (Sept. 9, 2010), as amended by 76 Fed. Reg. 2832 (Jan. 18, 2011) (collectively, the "New Portland Cement NESHAP"). Through these comments, Lehigh seeks to alert the Department to the potential for the conflict, to encourage the Department to accommodate the foiJowing concerns and to suggest a solution.

### The New Portland Cement NESHAP imposes very stringent particulate standards and continuous emissions monitoring ("CEM'') requirements with which Lehigh's Union Bridge facility must comply by September 9, 2013. 40 C.F.R. §63.1343
. Compliance with these standards will require the Union Bridge facility to install expensive particulate controls and a CEM system to measure compliance with the standard. Once installed, these CEMs will render the need tbr COMs to monitor compliance with the state and federal opacity standards and the Maryland visibility standard, obsolete. EPA acknowledged this fact in the preamble to the Federal Register notice for the proposed New Portland Cement NESHAP, stating that "we would also remove the 

### opacity standard and opacity continuous monitoring requirements for any source that was PM CEMS
... to detenninecompliance with a PM standard." 74 Fed. Reg. 21136,21157. EPA confirmed this in the Federal Register notice for the final rule, stating "any kiln or clinker cooler that uses a PM CEMS to monitor compliance with the PM emission limit is exempt from opacity standards." 75 Fed. Reg. 54970, 54989. Lehigh encourages the Department to incorporate the necessary flexibility into 

## its opacity and visibility regulations to allow Lehigh•s Union Bridge facility to transition from the use ofCOMs for measuring compHance with opacity and visibility standards, to using CEMs installed to meet the new particulate standard. Lehigh anticipates that 

## it will install those CEMs by the summer of2013. It seeks assurance from the Department that once the Union Bridge facility has installed and certified the CEMs, that the state regulations would allow it to retire the CO Ms. Specifically, Lehigh proposes the addition of the following revision to Regulation
. 10 

### of COMAR 26.11.01: .1 0 Continuous Opacity Monitoring Requirements. A. 

### Applicability and Exceptions
. (1) 

### The provisions ofthis regulation apply to the following eguipment to the extent it utilizes continuous opacity monitors to assure compliance with visibility and opacity requirements: This simple change should provide the flexibility which Lehigh requests. Lehigh understands that the Proposed Maryland Regulations on which it is commenting are intended, in part, to provide opacity procedures for portland cement plants in order to remove "'the applicability of TM 90·01 for COMs". Md. Reg., Vol. 38, Issue 2 at p. 104. Lehigh further understands that the regulation the Department submitted to the Air Quality Control Advisory Council for review and approval on January 31, 2011 by the Department, (to create a new chapter 30 in the Maryland air regulations) is intended, again in part, to complete the removal of the applicability of TM 90-01 to portland cement plants. (It 

### is also intended to consolidate all the requirements for portland cement manufacturing plants into one chapter.) Lehigh believes that the flexibility it requests for the transition from COMs to particulate CEMS through these comments should also 

### be incorporated in the new Chapter 30. Lehigh intends to provide a similar comment on the new chapter when it 

### is published in the Maryland Register. The comment will requests the 

# . '4 

# f t 

# .**~**



### addition of a provision in Regulation
. 04, Visible Emissions, which continns that particulate CEMS can be substituted for COMs to monitor compliance with the Maryland visibility standard. Please do not hesitate to contact me at 410-267-5900 or thenderson@richlaw.com with any questions. Very truly yours,

TRH/wmf
cc : K
. Deery, Lehigh Portland Cement Company LLC K
. Martin, Lehigh Portland Cement Company LLC

# .**~** 

# 0

### J 

### l

I I I**~** 

## ... .

0 Compari s on to Federal Standuds Th ere i s a corres ponding federal sUi ndard to th is proposed action, but t ile propo sed ac ti on is n o t more restri ctive or strin g ent . E s t i mate ofEeonomk: lmpRet The propos ed action has no economic i mpact. Economic lmput on Small Businessa Tlte proposed action h as minimal or no econom ic i mpact o n small bus i ness es . Impac t on Individuals with Disabilities The proposed actio n has no impact on indiv i duals with d i sabilit ies . Opportunity for Public Comment The Departme nt of the Environment will hold a publ ic hearing on tile propo s ed ac tion on February IS, 201 l, at 10 a. m. a t the Departme n t of the E nv ironment, 1800 Wa.s lungton Doulevard, l si Floor C o nferen ce R oo ms, Baltimore, Maryland 2 1 23 0-1720
. Interested person s a re invited to a ttend and express the i r v i ew s. Commen ts m ay b e sent t o Deborah R a b i

n , Regulations Coord ina t o r, Air o nd Ra d ia ti on Manag e ment Ad m mistration, DepBI'tment o r the E

nv •ronl'llCil t, 1800 Washington Boulevard, Sui te 7 3 0, Ba lt im ore , M

a ry land 2 1 23 0 · 1720, or emailed to drab i n @ mde
. stat e .md.u s . Co m ments mus t be re ce ived not lat e r dtan february 16, 20 I 1, or be subm itted a t the hea ring. For more infonnation, call Deborah R.1bin at (410) 53 7- 3240
.

Copies o f the proposed action and supportin g docum e n ts a re av aila ble for revi ew a t the follow i ng locati ons : Tlte A ir an d R adia t ion Man age ment Administrat ion; region a l offices of the Department i n Cum ber la n d and S a lisbury ; all local a ir quality control o ffices; and loc al h ealth dep art ments in th ose counties not having separate air qu ah t y c o ntro l o ffices
. Anyone n eedin g !ipC: Cinl accom modat ions 0 1 th e: p ub H c he aring**~houkl** COIUIC\ I M**lll:****l*'tlllent'~>** F a ir Prac t i "s**Oi~** at (410) 5 3 7- 396-l

. 'I"I'Y users m n) ' contact t he l>cpurtmc:nt th ro u gh tlu: M a ry la nd Rduy**Scn·• -c**  ot 1·800·73S-22S8. 

### 26
. 11.01 General Adm in is trat ive Provisions

Au tl 10rhy : En vironm ent ArtiCle , § §1-101, 1-404 , 2·10 1 -2

- 103, 2 · 301- 2 · 303 , IO-t02, •nd 10- 10 3 , Anno tated Code ofMary l1111d ( .I O'l.'onllnuous Opacity Monitoring Requirements. 

### \..:_. A
. App l icabili t y and E " cepti ons . (I) The provi si ons oft his regulation ap p ly to : ( o

)- (d) (text unch anged) (e) A nlunic ip a l waste combustor with a burni ng capacity !g r

eater th a n 

### I of35 ton s or g re a ter pet day. (2)- (4) (t ext unchan g ed) B
. (t ext u n changed) C
. C c 1

1i lic ati on ond Qu ality Assurance Procedures. (I)- (4) (t ext unch an ged) ( S

) !fue l] T he own er or operator of fuel-burn in g equ i pm ent j $

ubject to the COM requ ire ments i n COMAR 26
. 11.091 re q u ire d to inst all and operat e a COM s h a ll meet the qual ity ass uranc e procedures co ntai ned in !T echnical Memorandum 90-01 "Conti nu ou s Emissi on Mon itorin g (C EM) Policies and Proced\II'CS," Pa rt II Qu a lity As surance Re qu irements for C o ntinuous Opacity Monitoring Sy stc:ms J COMAR 2 6 .11.31

. D
. - f (text unch an ged)

. 11 Continuou s Em iss ion Monitoring Reqwlrrmen t.t.

A
. Appl icab ili ty and ElCem pti ons .

( I ) The provi sions of t his re gulation apply to : ( a) (t e lCt unc han ged) lOS ( b) Muni c ipal waste combustors wit h a bum ' n g capac i t y !great er t han ) of3 5 t ons or grta ttr per d a y; (c) - (d ) (text urK:hanged) ( 2 ) ( text unchange d) B
. Gen eral R equirements fo r C EMs
. (I)

- (2) (tel(t un ch anged) (3) The own er o r operator of : ( a

) A m unic ip a l wast e combu st or (MWC) sh a ll ins tall I a C I:: M in ac c o rdan ce: with the requ irement s in COMAR 26. 1 1
. 08.07 o r 2 6.1 1.08 .0 8, as appl ic• hleJ CF.M s lo meas u re and rr cord SO , , NO,. carbon monoxid e em iss • ions and e ith e r COz or OX)I g en; (b) A Kra ft pulp mill sh a ll ins ta ll a C EM to mea su re and record (proc ess tot a l red u ced su l fur in accord ance w ith COMA R 26. 1 1.14.05 ) S OJ andflow ; and ( c ) A fluidized bed c o mbu s tor or any size shall install C E Ms to m easure ortd rtc or d sulfur d i ox ide , nitro ge n oxide an d**c: th~r**  o xygen or carbon di o xide
. __..**_( 4).{tcx_t_u~~** **~** 

### f.

# c .- D
. ( tc:xt•mchnnged) '{- Rt'"-li1·il"1o."«pmt;;'ifd**Re"'Pcxw• ~;**  Requ ire ntt fl t

S (I) CE M System Doltlflli m e Re po rl i ng Re q ui rem enu (a) All CE M s ystem downtime that l asu or i1 expect e d to las t mor e th an 24 h o urs shall be report ed t o th e Depart me

nt by t ele

pho n e before 10 a. m. of the first regular b r umes s day followin g the br e a lcd own. ( b

) Th e sy st

e m breulcdown report req u ired by §E(I)(a) of th i

s regul a tion sha ll in clud e th e reason, 

### if kn own, f or the bna/cdown and th e esti mat e d pe r i od of t ime th a t t h e C E

M w ill be down , Th e owner or operato r o f the C E

M :shall not ify tht Dtpo r lm ent l1y t e le

phone w hen an out-of-se rv ice C EM is b aclc in operation and pr

od

ucin g d ata th a t has mel performuna! spe c ificatio n sfo r a c cumcy, re li ability, and durab ility of ac cept abl e mon it or

i n

g s y s t

em

s , a s vided in c:{)MA R26.. 11 -8- and .is JJ!!!Jiucillg tUli a. --.. ./ (2) GEM Dtrta Hrporiing Hftltl irtm trlt:t

. '- _........,.. "" ( (11} A CF\1 t h a lf mltofiiCitlettlly n:d u ce ttl/ de /Ill w 6.m uurtt· hl

ad ll 'l'11184:.r J.'alc uh lll•d fra u ' J6 or muf'l! tq r m l( l s

pc1, · c cJ tl •t W**f'Hl/111 ~**  --------- I 

### --r i{A fl te s t rc.tllfts**lfiil/ ~rrr!d** **1rrrrf orn"iiitltpptovecl**  b y-"' the Depor t ment. (c

) C ert

ific at ion testin g sha ll be re pe ated vhen t he D e

parlnrefll de t er

111 in e s that th e CE M data may not mee t pe r

fof'lliQn ce s pe cifica tio ns bec ause of camponent r e placement or ot

her condi tions that affe ct the quality o f ge nerat ed data
. (d} A qua rt erly s umma ry r e po rt s h all be s11 bm 11 led t o t

he D

ep

ar

tment nol l attr th an 30 d ays foflow ing each calendar quart er

. Th e r epo rt shall be 1 n a format appro vt d b y t h e Oe portment, and shall includ e thefollow in g : (I) Th e ca un , t im e per io ds , and mag n it ude o f all emiss ion:s w hich exce ed t he app li cabl e em i s s ion st a n d

ard s , (ii) The so urce downtim e includin g t he trin e and date o f the be gi

nnin g a nd end of each down time perio d and wheth er th e ! ource down tr me w as p lanned or un p l

anne d; (ii i

) The t i me peri ods a n d cau se of all C E

M do w ntim e inr:llid mg recard s o

f any r e pa irs, a djustmen ts . or ma i nt

e nance th at m

ay a ffect t he a bility of the C E

M Ia me et pe r fo rmanc e specrfi c ution s of

em •s s 1o n da t a; ( iv

) Qua r t

e rly totals of exc ess em is s to ns, mslallaflon dow11time, and C E

M do wfllime dur ing the ca le nda r qu a rter; (v) Quarte rly q w lity ass u ran ce ac tivllte s; (vi) Dail y ca /ibra llon actnlllte s t hat include**re ~**  val ues, a ctua l val ueJ.:, abs olut e o r percent o f s

pa

n d ifleren c n , and drift su uu.s : a nd (vti} Othe r inf or

m

at i

on r e q utre d b y th e Deportment t ha t is dete r mi

n ed to h t! nec e ssa ry ro el!aluo l e t he d ata , to ensurt! t ha

t MARYLAND REGIST E R
. VOLUME 38, ISSUE Z, Jo ' IUDA Y, JANUAJU' 14,2011, 111
. ...

# --- MOE


# -

--- 

### Name (please print) 

## ffl...=-;:.t.u**~~~~**

! 

# 6z.
... .....!

## [~**"' )** **i.l&-~(.. ~**  

### j l /

# li-**/. ~S~**  MARYLAND DEPART II \....., l OF THE ENVIRONMENT AIR AND RADIATION 

### MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATION PUBUC HEARING ON REGULATIONSIAIIENDIIENTS Date: February 15, 2011 

### Signature Street Addresa City/Statal Zip Code ' r;..._

## ~~**~** 

# ,r . , 100**CCJN<j(~(¥CI** til!f-Y 

## SkittW;i<IC. t

## ~t**~ ~IH.:/1** **M<1~ ~**  

## P\D

' \ '2.1 2.0**~** I 2.j2.e."2-

# ~i~**9J~ ~6"1** 

# A.,,.**~L.vu...5,J~,I"'G..,** 

### M.3 oJ_t>/tO 

# ft**~~** 

## p._,R..;:**S~J**

# ~r**J/~** :;.; 'lo 1 

## I I 

# I 

# i 

# I

r

I

# l Organization or Do You Affiliation Wish To Testify?**~"'~1/i** 

### U-MlcAJ 

### #;() 

### J;i:.o /

# ~~**E~ 'l~JV.:.G:;:**  

# tC)**fl.~** 

## f 

# ;t.t
... .._ /1/o

# 0

,,