alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2022198EN.01005302.xml

| 16.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 198/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 198/53

---

Action brought on 15 March 2022 — HCP v EUIPO — Timm Health Care (PYLOMED)

(Case T-138/22)

(2022/C 198/78)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: HCP GmbH (Hanover, Germany) (represented by: H. Suhren, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Timm Health Care BV (Borculo, Netherlands)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark PYLOMED — Application for registration No 18 132 059

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 January 2022 in Case R 814/2021-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
No. 11-10712.

#### Moore *v.*Tucker, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 108 

Expressing support for the designation of July 12 as Collector Car Appreciation Day and recognizing that the collection and restoration of historic 

and classic cars is an important part of preserving the technological 

achievements and cultural heritage of the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 6, 2019 

Mr. POSEY (for himself and Mr. BISHOP of Georgia) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of July 12 as Collector Car Appreciation Day and recognizing that the 

collection and restoration of historic and classic cars 

is an important part of preserving the technological 

achievements and cultural heritage of the United States. 

Whereas many people in the United States maintain classic 

automobiles as a pastime and do so with great passion 

and as a means of individual expression; 

Whereas the House of Representatives recognizes the effect 

that the more than 100-year history of the automobile 

has had on the economic progress of the United States 

and supports wholeheartedly all activities involved in the 

restoration and exhibition of classic automobiles; 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 108 IH 

Whereas the collection, restoration, and preservation of automobiles is an activity shared across generations and 

across all segments of society; 

Whereas thousands of local car clubs and related businesses 

have been instrumental in preserving a historic part of 

the heritage of the United States by encouraging the restoration and exhibition of such vintage works of art; 

Whereas automotive restoration provides well-paying, highskilled jobs for people in all 50 States; and 

Whereas automobiles have provided the inspiration for music, 

photography, cinema, fashion, and other artistic pursuits 

that have become part of the popular culture of the 

United States: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the designation of ‘‘Collector Car 

3 Appreciation Day’’; 

4 (2) recognizes that the collection and restora5 tion of historic and classic cars is an important part 

6 of preserving the technological achievements and cul7 tural heritage of the United States; and 

8 (3) encourages the people of the United States 

9 to engage in events and commemorations of Col10 lector Car Appreciation Day that create opportuni11 ties for collector car owners to educate young people 

12 about the importance of preserving the cultural her13 itage of the United States, including through the 

14 collection and restoration of collector cars. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
# C_2022326EN.01002801.xml

| 29.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/28

---

Action brought on 12 July 2022 — Pascoe pharmazeutische Präparate v EUIPO — Novartis Pharma (PASCELMO)

(Case T-435/22)

(2022/C 326/38)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Pascoe pharmazeutische Präparate GmbH (Gießen, Germany) (represented by: M. Kinkeldey, S. Brandstätter and S. Clotten, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Novartis Pharma AG (Basel, Switzerland)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the word mark PASCELMO — International registration designating the European Union No 1 516 387

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 May 2022 in Case R 1890/2021-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order that the costs of the proceedings be borne by the defendant and by the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal if it joins as intervener. |
| --- | --- |

—

order that the costs of the proceedings be borne by the defendant and by the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal if it joins as intervener.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
PO BOX 1348, HOOPA CA 95546 e WWW.HOOPA-NSN .GOV 

July 7, 2014 

Mr. Fred Leutner 

Office of Science & Technology (Mail Code 4305T) 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 

Washington DC 20460 

E-mail Leutner.Fred@epa.gov 

RE: Potential Reinterpretation of the Clean Water Act (CWA) Provisions regarding Treatment 

in a Similar Manner to States (TAS) 

Dear Mr. Leutner: 

It has come to the Hoopa Valley Tribe's attention that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

(EPA) is considering a Reinterpretation of the rules governing the burden placed on Tribes 

applying for TAS under the CWA for Section 303(c), Water Quality Standards. Currently, Tribes 

must demonstrate their own inherent regulatory authority, which is challenging and resource 

intensive. This burden alone has cost Tribes both time and funds to meet this requirement. The 

potential reinterpretation which would eliminate the "Montana Test" by stating that CW A 

Section 518 is a delegation by Congress to eligible Tribes to administer CW A regulatory 

programs over their entire reservations regardless of land ownership will allow Tribes to exercise 

their sovereignty by our ability and willingness to accept this delegation. 

In 1990, the Hoop~ V all~y Tribe applied to EPA fQr T AS under the CW A. lh 2001 Hoopa Tribe 

was approved to administer CW A Section 303 water quality standards program. It has taken us 

11 year,s and over forty thousand dollars in legal fees to receive EPA approved water quality 

standards for our reservation waters. 

DAN I E L L E VIG IL- MAST E N , C HAI R PE RSON e HUPAC H AIR@H OOPA- N S N .G OV e P H 5 30-625 -4 2 1 I e FX 5 30- 6 2 5 -4594 
The Hoopa Tribe believes EPA's reinterpretation will clarify and strengthen the inherent 

regulatory authority of sovereign tribes to implement EPA statutes within reservations regardless 

of land ownership. Reinterpretation would validate the legal basis for tribal assertion of 

regulatory jurisdiction under the CW A and decrease the administrative burden of case-by-case 

assessments of tribal authority. 

As Tribal Chairwoman of the Hoopa Valley Tribe, I support EPA's efforts to reinterpret 

provisions of the CW A regarding the T AS process. Thank you for the opportunity to provide 

comments on this potential rule change. 

Respectfully, 

~~:::man Hoopa Valley Tribe 

PO Box 1038 

Hoopa, CA 95546 

(530) 625-4211
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent**

**Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporationby reference in the Registration Statement (No. 333-46030) on Form S-8 ofInnSuites Hospitality Trust and subsidiaries of our report dated May 5, 2005,appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K as of January 31, 2005 and for theyear then ended.

 

 
|                 | /s/ EPSTEIN,  WEBER & CONOVER, P.L.C. |   |
|----------------------|-------------------------------------------|--------|
| Scottsdale,  Arizona |
| May 5, 2005          |

 

----
ex10a.htm
















Exhibit 10(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 29 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-138190) pertaining to Lincoln Life Variable Annuity Account N, which is incorporated by reference into Post-Effective Amendment No. 59 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-61554) and Amendment No. 390 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-08517), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) April 1, 2014, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) April 1, 2014, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life Variable Annuity Account N for the registration of interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.













/s/ Ernst & Young LLP












Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


April 1, 2014
# C_2022213EN.01004601.xml

| 30.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 213/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 213/46

---

Action brought on 12 April 2022 — Crédit agricole and Others v ECB

(Case T-188/22)

(2022/C 213/63)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Crédit agricole SA (Montrouge, France) and the 63 other applicants (represented by: A. Gosset-Grainville, M. Trabucchi and M. Dalon, lawyers)

Defendant: European Central Bank

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:

| — | annul section 1.5 and sections 3.5.1 to 3.5.8 of ECB decision No ECB-SSM-2022-FRCAG-5 of 2 February 2022 (together with its annexes), in so far as it prescribes measures to be taken in relation to irrevocable payment commitments concerning the deposit guarantee schemes or resolution funds; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul section 1.5 and sections 3.5.1 to 3.5.8 of ECB decision No ECB-SSM-2022-FRCAG-5 of 2 February 2022 (together with its annexes), in so far as it prescribes measures to be taken in relation to irrevocable payment commitments concerning the deposit guarantee schemes or resolution funds;

| — | order the defendant to pay all the costs |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay all the costs

| — | adopt, under Articles 88 and 89 of the Rules of Procedure, a measure of organisation of procedure seeking to have the ECB disclose the decisions concerning irrevocable payment commitments taken in respect of other banking institutions for 2021, particularly those relating to the other French banking institutions. |
| --- | --- |

—

adopt, under Articles 88 and 89 of the Rules of Procedure, a measure of organisation of procedure seeking to have the ECB disclose the decisions concerning irrevocable payment commitments taken in respect of other banking institutions for 2021, particularly those relating to the other French banking institutions.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants rely on four pleas in law which are identical or similar to those relied upon in Case T-186/22, BNP Paribas v European Central Bank.

---
Table 1. U.S. Biofuels operable production capacity 

million gallons per year

Period Fuel Ethanol Biodiesel

Renewable Diesel and 

Other Biofuels1

2021

January 17,510 2,394 791 

February 17,455 2,394 791 

March 17,376 2,410 791 

April 17,396 2,410 971 

May 17,396 2,428 971 

June 17,393 2,428 911 

July 17,393 2,430 911 

August 17,393 2,430 911 

September 17,393 2,462 911 

October 17,393 2,461 1,014 

November 17,428 2,389 1,017 

December 17,385 2,244 1,106 

2022

January 17,399 2,245 1,468

February 17,423 2,232 1,468 

March 17,323 2,231 1,468 

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-819 "Monthly Report of Biofuels, Fuels from Non-Biogenic Wastes, 

Fuel Oxygenates, Isooctane, and Isooctene"

1

Other biofuels include renewable heating oil, renewable jet fuel, renewable naphtha, renewable gasoline, and other biofuels 

and biointermediates.

U.S. Energy Information Administration | Monthly Biofuels Capacity and Feedstocks Update
No. 11-11140.

#### Graves *v.*United States.

C. A. 2d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
|
|

|Energy Market and Economic Impacts of H.R. 2454, the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009                          
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Figure 27.   ACESA Allocation Shares, 2012-2030.  Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800).
|Figure 27.   ACESA Allocation Shares, 2012-2030.  Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800).
|Figure 27.   ACESA Allocation Shares, 2012-2030.  Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800).
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 52 (Tuesday, March 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12821-12822]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6760]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. TM97-10-23-000]


Eastern Shore Natural Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

March 12, 1997.
    Take notice that on March 7, 1997, Eastern Shore Natural Gas 
Company (ESNG) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
First Revised Volume No. 1, certain revised tariff sheet in the above 
captioned docket, with a proposed effective date of April 1, 1997.
    ESNG states that the purpose of this instant filing is to ``track'' 
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation's (Transco) revised fuel 
retention percentages for injecting gas into storages (see Transco's 
Seventh Revised Sheet No. 29) proposed to be effective April 1, 1997.
    ESNG states that copies of the filing have been served upon its 
jurisdictional customers and interested State Commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rule 211 and Rule 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions 
or protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the 
Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission 
in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve 
to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the

[[Page 12822]]

Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-6760 Filed 3-17-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF

THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Keith C. Regnante, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of WAVE Life Sciences Ltd.
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 28, 2017

|                                                                                      
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                      
|/s/ Keith C. Regnante                                                                 
|Keith C. Regnante                                                                     
|Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer and
principal accounting officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                  
<ARTICLE> 5                             
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial
information extracted from the quarter ended
September 30, 1996 Form 10-Q Consolidated Balance
Sheets and Consolidated Statements of Operations as of
September 30, 1996, and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000                      
                                        
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           1,368
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,385
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                         646
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,385
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,667
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 23,583
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             23,583
<DISCONTINUED>                                      66
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    23,649
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   208.76
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
                                                      

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1996             MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995             DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                       1,465,647              1,465,647
<SECURITIES>                                         0                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  561,357                561,357
<ALLOWANCES>                                   105,018                105,018
<INVENTORY>                                  1,081,356              1,081,356
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,371,776              3,371,776
<PP&E>                                       6,445,626              6,445,626
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,057,154              1,057,154
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,869,364              8,869,364
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          913,370                913,370
<BONDS>                                              0                      0
<COMMON>                                       531,443                531,443
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                      0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                      0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,869,364              8,869,364
<SALES>                                      1,029,786              2,298,666
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,029,786              2,298,666
<CGS>                                        1,042,090              2,433,200
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,042,090              2,433,200
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               695,058              1,749,357
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              44,500                 70,822
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (751,862)             (1,954,713)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (751,862)             (1,954,713)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (751,862)             (1,954,713)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)                   (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)                   (.06)


</TABLE>
No. 11-10454.

#### Johnson *v.*Swarthout, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.