Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 49 / Thursday, March 13, 1997 / Notices 11925

present oral testimony shall be

submitted to the NAO at the time of

filing.

No request to present oral testimony

will be considered unless accompanied

by a written statement or brief. A

request to present oral testimony may be

denied if the written statement or brief

suggests that the information sought to

be provided is unrelated to the review

of the submission or for other

appropriate reasons. The NAO will

notify each requester of the disposition

of the request to present oral testimony.

In presenting testimony, the witness

should summarize the written statement

or brief, may supplement the written

statement or brief with relevant

information, and should be prepared to

answer questions from the Secretary of

the NAO or the Secretary’s designee.

Oral testimony will ordinarily be

limited to a ten minute presentation, not

including the time for questions.

Persons desiring more than ten minutes

for their presentation should so state in

the request, setting out reasons why

additional time is necessary.

The requirements relating to the

submission of written statements on

briefs and requests to present oral

testimony may be waived by the

Secretary of the NAO for reasons of

equity and public interest.

Signed At Washington, D.C. on March 13,

1997.

Irasema T. Garza,

Secretary, U.S. National Administrative

Office.

[FR Doc. 97–6224 Filed 3–12–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–28–M

Mine Safety and Health Administration

Petitions for Modification

The following parties have filed

petitions to modify the application of

mandatory safety standards under

section 101(c) of the Federal Mine

Safety and Health Act of 1977.

1. Clark Elkhorn Mining Company

[Docket No. M–96–204–C]

Clark Elkhorn Mining Company, P.O.

Box 2805, Pikeville, Kentucky 41502

has filed a petition to modify the

application of 30 CFR 75.308 (boreholes

in advance of mining) to its Ratliff Mine

No. 111 (I.D. No. 15–17776) located in

Pike County, Kentucky. The petitioner

requests a waiver of the mandatory

standard to allow borehole drilling at

distances greater than 50 feet from the

Hopkins Creek Coal Company’s Mine

No. 1 (I.D. No. 15–11602). The

petitioner states that application of the

standard would result in a diminution

of safety to the miners. The petitioner

asserts that the proposed alternative

method would provide at least the same

measure of protection as would the

mandatory standard.

2. Brookside Coal Company

[Docket No. M–96–205–C]

Brookside Coal Company, Box 64,

Spring Glen, Pennsylvania 17978 has

filed a petition to modify the

application of 30 CFR 75.1200 (d) & (i)

(mine maps) to its Diamond Slope (I.D.

No. 36–08456) located in Schuylkill

County, Pennsylvania. The petitioner

proposes to use cross-sections instead of

contour lines through the intake slope,

at locations of rock tunnel connections

between veins, and at 1,000-foot

intervals of advance from the intake

slope and to limit the required mapping

of the mine workings above and below

to those present within 100 feet of the

veins being mined except when veins

are interconnected to other veins

beyond the 100-foot limit through rock

tunnels. The petitioner asserts that the

proposed alternative method would

provide at least the same measure of

protection as would the mandatory

standard.

3. Brookside Coal Company

[Docket No. M–96–206–C]

Brookside Coal Company, Box 64,

Spring Glen, Pennsylvania 17978 has

filed a petition to modify the

application of 30 CFR 75.360 (preshift

examination) to its Diamond Slope (I.D.

No. 36–08456) located in Schuylkill

County, Pennsylvania. The petitioner

proposes to visually examine each seal

for physical damage from the slope

gunboat during the preshift examination

after an air quantity reading is taken

inby the intake portal and to test for the

quantity and quality of air at the intake

air split locations off the slope in the

gangway portion of the workings. The

petitioner proposes to physically

examine the entire length of the slope

once a month. The petitioner asserts

that the proposed alternative method

would provide at least the same

measure of protection as would the

mandatory standard.

4. Brookside Coal Company

[Docket No. M–96–207–C]

Brookside Coal Company, Box 64,

Spring Glen, Pennsylvania 17978 has

filed a petition to modify the

application of 30 CFR 75.364(b)(1), (4)

and (5) (weekly examination) to its

Diamond Slope (I.D. No. 36–08456)

located in Schuylkill County,

Pennsylvania. Due to hazardous

conditions and roof falls, certain areas

of the intake haulage slope and primary

escapeway cannot be traveled safely.

The petitioner proposes to examine the

areas from the gunboat/slope car with

an alternative air quality evaluation at

the section’s intake level, and travel and

throughly examine these areas for

hazardous conditions once a month.

The petitioner asserts that the proposed

alternative method would provide at

least the same measure of protection as

would the mandatory standard.

5. Brookside Coal Company

[Docket No. M–96–208–C]

Brookside Coal Company, Box 64,

Spring Glen, Pennsylvania 17978 has

filed a petition to modify the

application of 30 CFR 75.1002–1

(location of other electrical equipment;

requirements for permissibility) to its

Diamond Slope (I.D. No. 36–08456)

located in Schuylkill County,

Pennsylvania. The petitioner requests a

modification of the standard to permit

use of non-permissible electric

equipment within 150 feet of the pillar

line due in part to the method of mining

used in pitching anthracite mines. As an

alternative, the petitioner proposes to

evaluate the mine air quality for

methane on an hourly basis during

operation and record one of the gas test

results in the on-shift examination

record. The petitioner also proposes to

suspend equipment operation anytime

the methane concentration at the

equipment reaches 0.5 percent or when

found during a preshift examination.

The petitioner asserts that the proposed

alternative method would provide at

least the same measure of protection as

would the mandatory standard.

6. Brookside Coal Company

[Docket No. M–96–209–C]

Brookside Coal Company, Box 64,

Spring Glen, Pennsylvania 17978 has

filed a petition to modify the

application of 30 CFR 75.1100 (quantity

and location of firefighting equipment)

to its Diamond Slope (I.D. No. 36–

08456) located in Schuylkill County,

Pennsylvania. The petitioner proposes

to use only portable fire extinguishers to

replace existing requirements where

rock dust, water cars, and other water

storage are not practical. The petitioner

asserts that the proposed alternative

method would provide at least the same

measure of protection as would the

mandatory standard.

7. Brookside Coal Company

[Docket No. M–96–210–C]

Brookside Coal Company, Box 64,

Spring Glen, Pennsylvania 17978 has

filed a petition to modify the
11926 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 49 / Thursday, March 13, 1997 / Notices

application of 30 CFR 75.1201–1(a)

(temporary notations, revisions, and

supplements) to its Diamond Slope (I.D.

No. 36–08456) located in Schuylkill

County, Pennsylvania. The petitioner

proposes to revise and supplement mine

maps annually instead of every 6

months, as required, and to update

maps daily by hand notations. The

petitioner asserts that the proposed

alternative method would provide at

least the same measure of protection as

would the mandatory standard.

8. Brookside Coal Company

[Docket No. M–96–211–C]

Brookside Coal Company, Box 64,

Spring Glen, Pennsylvania 17978 has

filed a petition to modify the

application of 30 CFR 75.335

(construction of seals) to its Diamond

Slope (I.D. No. 36–08456) located in

Schuylkill County, Pennsylvania. The

petitioner requests a modification of the

standard to permit alternative methods

of construction of seals using wooden

materials of moderate size and weight

due to the difficulty in accessing

previously driven headings and breasts

containing inaccessible abandoned

workings; to accept a design criteria in

the 10 psi range; and to permit the water

trap to be installed in the gangway seal

and sampling tube in the monkey seal

for seals installed in pairs. The

petitioner asserts that the proposed

alternative method would provide at

least the same measure of protection as

would the mandatory standard.

9. Consolidation Coal Company

[Docket No. M–97–01–C]

Consolidation Coal Company, Consol

Plaza, 1800 Washington Road,

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15241–1421

has filed a petition to modify the

application of 30 CFR 75.1002 (location

of trolley wires, trolley feeder wires,

high-voltage cables and transformers) to

its Shoemaker Mine (I.D. No. 46–01436)

located in Marshall County, West

Virginia. The petitioner proposes to use

high-voltage (4,160 volt) cables inby the

last open crosscut. The petitioner asserts

that the proposed alternative method

would provide at least the same

measure of protection as would the

mandatory standard.

10. Eastern Associated Coal

Corporation

[Docket No. M–97–02–C]

Eastern Associated Coal Corporation,

800 Laidley Tower, P.O. Box 1233,

Charleston, West Virginia 25324 has

filed a petition to modify the

application of 30 CFR 75.364 (weekly

examination) to its Federal No. 2 Mine

(I.D. No. 46–01456) located in

Monongalia County, West Virginia. The

petitioner requests amendments to its

previously granted petition for

modification (Docket No. M–92–120–C)

which was filed to allow checkpoints

instead of examining portions of the

mine that were inaccessible due to

adverse roof conditions. The petitioner

states that a portion of the mine has

been sealed thus eliminating the need

for certain checkpoints; that

checkpoints 3, 4, 7, and 8 are now

behind seals and therefore are no longer

necessary; and that checkpoints 5 and 6

that were used to evaluate a return air

course from 2 West Mains will be

eliminated due to rehabilitation and

ventilation changes in the seal project

which is now being examined as

required. The petitioner asserts that the

proposed alternative method would

provide at least the same measure of

protection as would the mandatory

standard.

11. CONSOL of Kentucky, Inc.

[Docket No. M–97–03–C]

CONSOL of Kentucky, Inc., Consol

Plaza, 1800 Washington Road,

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15241–1421

has filed a petition to modify the

application of 30 CFR 75.1101 (water

sprinkler systems; arrangement of

sprinklers) to its Jones Fork 13A–H4

Mine (I.D. No. 15–17885) located in

Knott County, Kentucky. The petitioner

proposes to use a single overhead pipe

system with 1/2-inch orifice automatic

sprinklers located on 10-foot centers, to

cover 50 feet of fire-resistant belt or 150

feet of non-fire resistant belt, with

actuation temperatures between 200 and

230 degrees Fahrenheit and with water

pressure equal to or greater than 10 psi;

and to have the sprinklers located not

more than 10 feet apart so that the

discharge of water will extend over the

belt drive, belt take-up, electrical

control, and gear reducing unit. The

petitioner asserts that the proposed

alternative method would provide at

least the same measure of protection as

would the mandatory standard.

12. Marrowbone Development

Company

[Docket No. M–97–04–C]

Marrowbone Development Company,

P.O. Box 119, Naugatuck, West Virginia

25685 has filed a petition to modify the

application of 30 CFR 75.1002 (location

of trolley wires, trolley feeder wires,

high-voltage cables and transformers) to

its Big Branch Mine (I.D. No. 46–05978)

located in Mingo County, West Virginia.

The petitioner proposes to use (2,300

volt) a.c. electricity to power continuous

mining equipment. The petitioner

asserts that the proposed alternative

method would provide at least the same

measure of protection as would the

mandatory standard.

13. Powderhorn Coal Company

[Docket No. M–97–05–C]

Powderhorn Coal Company, 701

Market Street, Suite 700, St. Louis,

Missouri 63101–1826 has filed a

petition to modify the application of 30

CFR 75.350 (air courses and belt haulage

entries) to its Roadside Mine (I.D. No.

05–03012) located in Mesa County,

Colorado. The petitioner requests a

modification of the standard to permit

the use of belt air to ventilate active

working places. The petitioner proposes

to install a low-level carbon monoxide

detection system as an early warning

fire detection system in all belt entries

used as intake air courses. The

petitioner asserts that the proposed

alternative method would provide at

least the same measure of protection as

would the mandatory standard.

14. Philippi Development, Inc.

[Docket No. M–97–06–C]

Philippi Development, Inc., Route 3

Box 146, Philippi, West Virginia 26416

has filed a petition to modify the

application of 30 CFR 75.364(b)(2)

(weekly examination) to its Sentinel

Mine (I.D. No. 46–04168) located in

Barbour County, West Virginia. The

petitioner proposes to establish an inlet

evaluation point along with an outlet

evaluation point at which every seven

days a certified person would measure

methane and oxygen concentrations, air

quantity, make tests to determine if the

air is moving in its proper direction and

record the results in a book provided on

the surface. The petitioner asserts that

the proposed alternative method would

provide at least the same measure of

protection as would the mandatory

standard.

15. Laurel Coal Company

[Docket No. M–97–07–C and M–97–08–C]

Laurel Coal Company, P.O. Box 780,

Danville, West Virginia 25053 has filed

a petition to modify the application of

30 CFR 75.503 (permissible electric face

equipment; maintenance) to its 7A Mine

(I.D. No. 46–08566), and its Coalburg 9A

Mine (I.D. No. 46–08002) both located

in Logan County, West Virginia. The

petitioner proposes to replace a padlock

on battery plug connectors on mobile

battery-powered machines with a

threaded ring and a spring loaded

device to prevent the plug connector

from accidently disengaging while

under load. The petitioner asserts that
Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 49 / Thursday, March 13, 1997 / Notices 11927

the proposed alternative method would

provide at least the same measure of

protection as would the mandatory

standard.

16. K & L Coal Company

[Docket No. M–97–09–C]

K & L Coal Company, Box 266, R.D.

#1, Shamokin, Pennsylvania 17872 has

filed a petition to modify the

application of 30 CFR 75.1100–2

(quantity and location of firefighting

equipment) to its No. 10 Slope (I.D. No.

36–06649) located in Northumberland

County, Pennsylvania. The petitioner

proposes to use only portable fire

extinguishers to replace existing

requirements where rock dust, water

cars, and other water storage are not

practical. The petitioner asserts that the

proposed alternative method would

provide at least the same measure of

protection as would the mandatory

standard.

17. White Oak Mining & Construction

Company, Inc.

[Docket No. M–97–10–C]

White Oak Mining & Construction

Company, Inc., Scofield P.O. Box 60,

Helper, Utah 84526 has filed a petition

to modify the application of 30 CFR

75.362(d)(2) (on-shift examination) to its

White Oak No. 2 Mine (I.D. No. 42–

01280) located in Carbon County, Utah.

The petitioner proposes to make tests

for methane at least two rows of roof

bolts outby the last complete row of

permanent supports. The petitioner

states that application of the standard

would result in a diminution of safety

to the miners. In addition, the petitioner

asserts that the proposed alternative

method would provide at least the same

measure of protection as would the

mandatory standard.

18. Consol Pennsylvania Coal Company

[Docket No. M–97–11–C]

Consol Pennsylvania Coal Company,

Consol Plaza, 1800 Washington Road,

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15241–1421

has filed a petition to modify the

application of 30 CFR 75.503

(permissible electric face equipment;

maintenance) to its Bailey Mine (I.D.

No. 36–07230) located in Greene

County, Pennsylvania. The petitioner

requests a modification of the standard

to permit the maximum lengths of the

loading machine, roof bolter, and

section ventilation fan trailing cables

supplying equipment from 480-volt

alternating current systems to be

increased to 800 feet. The petitioner

asserts that the proposed alternative

method would provide at least the same

measure of protection as would the

mandatory standard.

19. Paramont Coal Corporation

[Docket No. M–97–12–C]

Paramont Coal Corporation, P.O. Box

7, Dante, Virginia 24237 has filed a

petition to modify the application of 30

CFR 77.214(a) (refuse piles; general) to

its Deep Mine 24 (I.D. No. 44–06802)

located in Wise County, Virginia. The

petitioner proposes to backfill the

existing highwall with scalp rock in an

area containing abandoned mine

openings. The petitioner has outlined in

this petition specific methods to be used

for sealing the mine openings. The

petitioner asserts that the proposed

alternative method would provide at

least the same measure of protection as

would the mandatory standard.

20. Cannelton Industries, Inc.

[Docket No. M–97–13–C]

Cannelton Industries, Inc., One

Oxford Centre, 301 Grant Street, 20th

Floor, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219–

1410 has filed a petition to modify the

application of 30 CFR 75.362(d)(2) (onshift examinations) to its Mine No. 145

(I.D. No. 46–08592) located in Kanawha

County, West Virginia. The petitioner

proposes to take methane tests at the

face from under permanent roof

support, or when such test is not

appropriate because the last row of

permanent support is sufficiently back

from the face, using a probe with a

maximum extension of 20 feet in

working places before a continuous

miner is taken in the place or energized;

to take methane tests at the next to last

row of permanent roof supports every

two minutes and use a 20 foot probe to

check for methane and if the methane is

less than 1.0 percent mining will begin

again, and if the methane is not less

than 1.0 percent, adjustments in

ventilation would be made until it is

reduced below 1.0 percent in working

places where continuous miners are

operating. The petitioner states that

application of the standard would result

in a diminution of safety to the miners.

In addition, the petitioner asserts that

the proposed alternative method would

provide at least the same measure of

protection as would the mandatory

standard.

21. Genwal Resources, Inc.

[Docket No. M–97–14–C]

Genwal Resources, Inc., P.O. Box

1420, 195 North 100 West, Huntington,

Utah 84528 has filed a petition to

modify the application of 30 CFR

75.1002 (location of trolley wires,

trolley feeder wires, high-voltage cables

and transformers) to its Crandall Canyon

Mine (I.D. No. 42–01715) located in

Emery County, Utah. The petitioner

proposes to use high-voltage (2400

volts) operated equipment inby the last

open crosscut at the working longwall

sections. The petitioner states that

application of the standard would result

in diminution of safety to the miners. In

addition, the petitioner asserts that the

proposed alternative method would

provide at least the same measure of

protection as would the mandatory

standard.

22. Mettiki Coal Corporation

[Docket No. M–97–15–C]

Mettiki Coal Corporation, 293 Table

Rock Road, Oakland, Maryland 21550

has filed a petition to modify the

application of 30 CFR 75.352 (return air

courses) to its Mettiki Mine (I.D. No. 18–

00621) located in Garrett County,

Maryland. The petitioner requests a

modification of the standard to permit

two-entry development of the headgate

for the No. 25 Longwall panel; and to

permit belt entries to be used for

ventilation purposes, using specific

requirements outlined in granted

petition 30 CFR 75.326 (now 30 CFR

75.350) Docket No. M–90–41–C, while

developing the two-entry system. The

petitioner proposes to install low-level

carbon monoxide sensors as an early

warning fire-detection system in the

intake escapeway entry and in the belt

entry at specific locations outlined in

this petition. The petitioner asserts that

the proposed alternative method would

provide at least the same measure of

protection as would the mandatory

standard.

23. Cyprus Cumberland Resources

Corporation

[Docket No. M–97–16–C]

Cyprus Cumberland Resources

Corporation, One Oxford Centre, 301

Grant Street, 20th Floor, Pittsburgh,

Pennsylvania 15219–1410 has filed a

petition to modify the application of 30

CFR 75.312 (c) & (d) (main mine fans

examinations and records) to its

Cumberland Mine (I.D. No. 36–05018)

located in Greene County, Pennsylvania.

The petitioner requests a modification

to permit persons other than those

specified in the mandatory standard to

enter and work underground on the

shift that monthly fan examinations are

being conducted and notify all persons

prior to the start of the shift that fan

examinations are going to be made and

give them access to the mine

communications system; and to have

the person conducting the inspection

contact the anchorman on the surface
11928 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 49 / Thursday, March 13, 1997 / Notices

and inform him that fan tests are about

to begin at each fan location. The

petitioner asserts that the proposed

alternative method would provide at

least the same measure of protection as

would the mandatory standard.

24. The Rosebud Mining Company LLC

[Docket No. M–97–01–M]

The Rosebud Mining Company LLC,

P.O. Box, Winnemucca, Nevada 89446

has filed a petition to modify the

application of 30 CFR 57.9300(a) (berms

or guardrails) to its Rosebud Unit Mine

(I.D. No. 26–02241) located in Humboldt

County, Nevada. The petitioner

proposes to place posts along the edges

of the roadway in order to better

delineate the edge of the road. The

petitioner states that installation of

berms would reduce the amount of

roadway and diminish safety by

increasing the possibility of accidental

collisions. The petitioner states that the

proposed alternative method would

provide at least the same measure of

protection as would the mandatory

standard.

Request for Comments

Persons interested in these petitions

may furnish written comments. These

comments must be filed with the Office

of Standards, Regulations, and

Variances, Mine Safety and Health

Administration, Room 627, 4015 Wilson

Boulevard, Arlington, Virginia 22203.

All comments must be postmarked or

received in that office on or before April

14, 1997. Copies of these petitions are

available for inspection at that address.

Dated: March 6, 1997.

Patricia W. Silvey,

Director, Office of Standards, Regulations,

and Variances.

[FR Doc. 97–6372 Filed 3–12–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–43–P

Occupational Safety and Health

Administration

Proposed Information Collection

Request Submitted for Public

Comment and Recommendations;

Reporting of Fatality or Multiple

Hospitalization Incidents (1218–0007)

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: The Department of Labor, as

part of its continuing effort to reduce

paperwork and respondent burden

conducts a preclearance consultation

program to provide the general public

and Federal agencies with an

opportunity to comment on proposed

and/or continuing collections of

information in accordance with the

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA

95) (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). This

program helps to ensure that requested

data can be provided in the desired

format, reporting burden (time and

financial resources) is minimized,

collection instruments are clearly

understood, and impact of collection

requirements on respondents can be

properly assessed. Currently, the

Occupational Safety and Health

Administration (OSHA) is soliciting

comments concerning the proposed

extension of approval for the paperwork

requirements of 29 CFR 1904.8,

Reporting of Fatality or Multiple

Hospitalization Incidents.

DATES: Written comments must be

submitted on or before May 12, 1997.

Written comments should:

• Evaluate whether the proposed

collection of information is necessary

for the proper performance of the

functions of the Agency, including

whether the information will have

practical utility;

• evaluate the accuracy of the

Agency’s estimate of the burden of the

proposed collection of information,

including the validity of the

methodology and assumptions used;

• enhance the quality, utility, and

clarity of the information to be

collected; and

• minimize the burden of the

collection of information on those who

are to respond, including through the

use of appropriate automated,

electronic, mechanical, or other

technological collection techniques or

other forms of information technology,

e.g., permitting electronic submissions

of responses.

ADDRESSES: Comments are to be

submitted to the Docket Office, Docket

No. ICR–97–6, U.S. Department of

Labor, Room N–2625, 200 Constitution

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210,

telephone: (202) 219–7894. Written

comments limited to 10 pages or less in

length may also be transmitted by

facsimile to (202) 219–5046.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Bonnie Friedman, Office of Information

and Consumer Affairs, Occupational

Safety and Health Administration, U.S.

Department of Labor, Room N3647, 200

Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington,

DC 20210, telephone: (202) 219–8148.

Copies of the reference information

collection request are available for

inspection and copying in the Docket

Office and will be mailed immediately

to persons who request copies by

telephoning Vivian Allen at (202) 219–

8076. For electronic copies, contact

OSHA’s WebPage on Internet at http://

www.osha.gov/.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

OSHA promulgated regulation 29 CFR

1904.8 which currently requires

employers to report work related

fatalities and/or incidents involving the

in-patient hospitalization of three or

more employees to OSHA within 8

hours of learning of the incident. OSHA

investigates such incidents in order to

provide the Agency with information on

the causes of employment fatalities,

injuries and illnesses to identify and

require correction of serious hazards

and to prevent the occurrence of such

incidents in the future. Such

information can also be a source of

support for new and revised safety and

health standards. Investigators will

determine whether there was a violation

of OSHA standards, and, if so, whether

the violation may have contributed to

the incident. In addition, the Agency

determines whether OSHA standards

adequately cover the hazards which led

to the incident. Therefore, such

investigations must be prompt and

thorough if they are to provide valid,

useful information and achieve their

intended purposes.

OSHA currently has approval from

The Office of Management and Budget

(OMB) for information collection

requirements contained in 29 CFR

1904.8. That approval will expire on

May 31, 1997, unless OSHA applies for

an extension of the OMB approval. This

notices initiates the process for OSHA to

request an extension of the current OMB

approval. This notice also solicits public

comment on OSHA’s existing

paperwork burden estimates from those

interested parties and to seek public

response to several questions related to

the development of OSHA’s estimation.

Interested parties are requested to

review OSHA’s estimates, which are

based upon the most current data

available, and to comment on their

accuracy or appropriateness in today’s

workplace situation.

II. Current Actions

This notice requests an extension of

the current OMB approval of the

paperwork requirements in 29 CFR

1904.8, Reporting of Fatality or Multiple

Hospitalization Incidents.

Type of Review: Extension of

currently approved collection.

Agency: U.S. Department of Labor,

Occupational Safety and Health

Administration.

Title: Reporting of Fatality or Multiple

Hospitalization Incidents.

OMB Number: 1218–0007.

Agency Number: Docket No. ICR–97–

6.