alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION 1 - NEW ENGLAND

5 POST OFFICE SQUARE - SUITE 100

BOSTON, MA 02109

June 6, 2011

Rebecca L. Hewett

Maine Department of Environmental Protection

17 SHS

Augusta, Maine 04333

Re: Partial Delisting of the Eastland Woolen Mill Superfund Site, Corinna, Maine

Dear Ms. Hewett:

EPA is providing the Maine Department of Environmental Protection (MEDEP) with a

draft Notice of Intent to Partial Deletion and Notice of Partial Deletion. Pursuant to the

procedures outlines in EPA guidance Close Out Procedures [or National Priorities List Sites,

OSWER Directive 9320.2-22, May 2011, EPA is providing the MEDEP 30 working days to

review the notice.

Feel free to contact me if you have any questions.

EPA also respectfully requests that MEDEP provide a letter of concurrence regarding

EPA's intent to delete portions ofthe Eastland Woolen Mill Superfund Site from the National

Priorities List.

Sincerely,

~LJ /)k ~/

Edward Hathaway, RP~

MENT ICT Superfund Section
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 104 

Expressing support for designation of the week beginning February 3, 2019, 

as ‘‘National Tribal Colleges and Universities Week’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 6, 2019 

Mr. O’HALLERAN (for himself, Mr. COLE, Mr. YOUNG, and Ms. TORRES

SMALL of New Mexico) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for designation of the week beginning 

February 3, 2019, as ‘‘National Tribal Colleges and Universities Week’’. 

Whereas there are 37 Tribal Colleges and Universities operating on more than 75 campuses in 16 States; 

Whereas Tribal Colleges and Universities are tribally chartered or federally chartered institutions of higher education and therefore have a unique relationship with the 

Federal Government; 

Whereas Tribal Colleges and Universities serve students from 

more than 230 federally recognized Indian Tribes; 

Whereas Tribal Colleges and Universities offer students access to knowledge and skills grounded in cultural tradiVerDate Sep 11 2014 21:55 Feb 06, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HR104.IH HR104

pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 104 IH 

tions and values, including indigenous languages, 

which— 

(1) enhances Indian communities; and 

(2) enriches the United States as a Nation; 

Whereas Tribal Colleges and Universities provide access to 

high-quality postsecondary educational opportunities 

for— 

(1) American Indians; 

(2) Alaska Natives; and 

(3) other individuals that live in some of the most 

isolated and economically depressed areas in the United 

States; 

Whereas Tribal Colleges and Universities are accredited institutions of higher education that prepare students to succeed in the global and highly competitive workforce; 

Whereas Tribal Colleges and Universities have open enrollment policies, and approximately 15 percent of the students at Tribal Colleges and Universities are non-Indian 

individuals; and 

Whereas the collective mission and the considerable achievements of Tribal Colleges and Universities deserve national recognition: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the designation of ‘‘National Trib3 al Colleges and Universities Week’’; and 

4 (2) calls on the people of the United States and 

5 interested groups to observe National Tribal Colleges 

6 and Universities Week with appropriate activities 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 104 IH 

1 and programs to demonstrate support for Tribal 

2 Colleges and Universities. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-19-00786-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF P.M.M.K., a Child

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018-PA-00915

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARTINEZ, JUSTICE RIOS, AND JUSTICE WATKINS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that no costs be assessed against appellant in relation to this appeal.

SIGNED April 8, 2020.

_____________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
#### M. A. Smith, Liquidator Trust Company of Florida, as Trustee, v. State Life Insurance Co., an Indiana Corporation.

153 So. 842.

Division B.

Opinion Filed March 27, 1934.

Petition for Rehearing Denied April 21, 1934.

*Edward E. Fleming,*for Appellant;

*Roscoe Brunstetter*and *Douglas D. Felix,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

— The appeal in this case is from an order appointing a receiver of hotel property in a proceeding brought to foreclose a mortgage on such property.

*372The order appealed from should be affirmed on authority of Smith, as Liquidator, v. Taylor, Receiver, opinion filed November 10, 1933 and reported 150 Sou. 803, although it is not shown that outstanding tax liens are about to be foreclosed. The bill does allege that taxes for 1931 and 1932 are delinquent and unpaid and that the property was in .great need of repair to prevent material deterioration.

The evidence produced was quite sufficient to warrant the Court in finding that the appointment of a receiver was needful for the preservation of the property.

It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Davis, C. J., and Ellis and Terrell, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1041 

Supporting the designation of July 11, 2020, as ‘‘Antique Motorcycle Enthusiast Day’’ and recognizing the preservation, restoration, and operation 

of old-time motorcycles in the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 9, 2020 

Mr. BALDERSON (for himself, Mr. BURGESS, and Mr. WALBERG) submitted 

the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the designation of July 11, 2020, as ‘‘Antique 

Motorcycle Enthusiast Day’’ and recognizing the preservation, restoration, and operation of old-time motorcycles 

in the United States. 

Whereas many people in the United States own, restore, preserve, study, or admire motorcycles that fall into the antique category, meaning they are at least 35-years old; 

Whereas the collection, restoration, and preservation of motorcycles is an activity shared across generations and 

across all segments of society; 

Whereas thousands of local motorcycle clubs and related businesses have been instrumental in preserving a historic 

part of the heritage of the United States by encouraging 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1041 IH 

the restoration and exhibition of such historic works of 

art; 

Whereas the restoration of motorcycles provides well-paying, 

highly skilled jobs for people in all 50 States; and 

Whereas, for over a century, motorcycles have been a source 

of family enjoyment, photographs, songs, movies, and an 

iconic fashion statement in the United States: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the designation of ‘‘Antique Motor3 cycle Enthusiast Day’’; 

4 (2) recognizes the effect of the more than 120- 

5 year history of the American motorcycle and the eco6 nomic surge that celebrated over 120 American 

7 brands in the United States in the first half of the 

8 20th Century; 

9 (3) recognizes that the collection and restora10 tion of vintage and classic motorcycles is an impor11 tant part of preserving the technological achieve12 ments and cultural heritage of the United States; 

13 and 

14 (4) encourages the people of the United States 

15 to engage in events and commemorations of ‘‘An16 tique Motorcycle Enthusiast Day’’ in accordance 

17 with public health guidelines that create opportuni18 ties for antique motorcycle owners to educate young 

19 people about the importance of preserving the culVerDate Sep 11 2014 04:20 Jul 10, 2020 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR1041.IH HR1041

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1041 IH 

1 tural heritage of the United States, including 

2 through the preservation of antique motorcycles. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 43 (Wednesday, March 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 10057]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5417]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRC-5699-7]


Release of Volume 2, Risk Assessment and Risk Management in 
Regulatory Decision-Making; Commission on Risk Assessment and Risk 
Management

    Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, 
notice is hereby given that the Commission on Risk Assessment and Risk 
Management, established as an Advisory Committee under Section 303 of 
the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, will release Volume 2, of its 
two-volume final report, Risk Assessment and Risk Management in 
Regulatory Decision-Making, on March 7, 1997. Volume 1 was released in 
a public meeting held on January 29, 1997.
    If you wish to receive a copy of the final report, either fax your 
request to 202-233-9540, mail your request to the Commission on Risk 
Assessment and Risk Management, 529 14th Street, NW, Room 420, 
Washington, DC 20045, or obtain via the internet at <a href="http://
www.riskworld.com">http://
www.riskworld.com</a>. Be sure to indicate your complete mailing address 
and a phone number where you can be reached. If you have already 
requested a copy of the draft report, or a copy of Volume 1, it is not 
necessary to send another request. Everyone who requested a copy 
earlier will be sent Volume 2.
    If you need additional information, please call 202-233-9537. The 
report will not be available prior to March 7, 1997.

    Dated: February 27, 1997.
Gail Charnley,
Executive Director, Commission on Risk Assessment and Risk Management.
[FR Doc. 97-5417 Filed 3-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-M
#### IN RE: Christina HARGON, Debtor. Christina Hargon, Plaintiff, v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, and Aldridge Pite, LLP, Defendants.

CASE NO. 17-63356-PWB

ADVERSARY PROCEEDING NO. 18-5031-PWB

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division.

Signed February 21, 2018

Entered 2/22/2018

Christina Hargon, Snellville, GA, pro se.

Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, pro se.

Aldridge Pite, LLP, pro se.

ORDER

Paul W. Bonapfel, U.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge

On February 6, 2018, Christina Hargon, the Plaintiff, filed a “Complaint for Damages with Supplemental of Jurisdiction and Stay of All State Court Claims & Related State Court Claims Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367.” [Doc. 1]. The gist of Ms. Hargon’s complaint is that the Defendants conducted an unlawful foreclosure under Georgia law.

Ms. Hargon has no pending bankruptcy case. She was previously a debtor in a chapter 13 bankruptcy case, case number 17-63356-pwb. Ms. Hargon filed the bankruptcy case on July 31, 2017, and it was dismissed on September 18, 2017, based upon her failure to correct filing deficiencies and to prosecute this case. Over three months after the closing of the case (and on the same day as the filing of the complaint), Ms. Hargon filed an untimely appeal of the dismissal order.

The dismissal of Ms. Hargon’s bankruptcy case terminated the Court’s jurisdiction over any issues raised in this post-dismissal filed adversary proceeding. The filing of a notice of appeal in the closed bankruptcy case does not change this outcome. And even if this adversary proceeding had been pending at the time of the dismissal of Ms. Hargon’s case, the Court would have dismissed it because there would have been no basis for the discretionary retention of jurisdiction of the proceeding. *See Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Morris (In re Morris),*950 F.2d 1531, 1535 (11th Cir. 1992).

The Court concludes, *sua sponte,*that abstaining from hearing the claims assert*912ed by Ms. Hargon in this adversary proceeding is appropriate.

Section 1334(c)(1) of Title 28 provides, “Except with respect to a case under chapter 15 of title 11, nothing in this section prevents a district court in the interest of justice, or in the interest of comity with State courts or respect for State law, from abstaining from hearing a particular proceeding, arising under title 11 or arising in or related to a case under title 11.”

Ms. Hargon has no pending case under title 11. Her claims arise under nonbank-ruptcy law and may be resolved in a non-bankruptcy forum. To the extent that any of her claims are valid, they have no bearing on the administration of the bankruptcy estate because no bankruptcy estate exists to administer. Based on these circumstances, the Court concludes abstention is warranted in the interests of justice. For the foregoing reasons, it is

ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1334(c)(1), the Court hereby abstains from hearing the claims asserted by Ms. Hargon in this adversary proceeding and that this adversary proceeding be, and the same hereby is, dismissed.
EXHIBIT 99.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of MetroBanCorp (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ike G. Batalis,
President and Chief Executive Officer, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

     This certification is furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
and is not being filed for any other purpose.


/s/ IKE G. BATALIS
-------------------------------------
Ike G. Batalis
President and Chief Executive Officer
November 13, 2002
The Honorable James M. Rosenbaum, United States District Judge for the

1

District of Minnesota.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 97-1877

_____________

Jeffrey A. Trueman, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States 

v. * District Court for the

* District of Minnesota.

United States Department of Navy, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

_____________

Submitted: November 18, 1997

Filed: November 26, 1997

_____________

Before BOWMAN, LAY, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

_____________

PER CURIAM.

Jeffrey Trueman sued the Navy for violating his rights under the Privacy Act, 5

U.S.C. § 552a (1994 & Supp. II 1996), by denying him access to records concerning

his Navy career. The District Court granted the Navy's motion to dismiss the case

1

under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). Having reviewed the

record, we conclude that the dismissal of the suit was correct for two reasons: (1) the

District Court lacked jurisdiction because Trueman failed to exhaust his administrative
-2-

remedies prior to filing suit; and (2) Trueman did not file his claim within the period

prescribed by the Privacy Act's statute of limitations, 5 U.S.C. § 522a(g)(5). Because

an extensive opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the judgment of the

District Court in accordance with 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
EXHIBIT 32.2
  SECTION 1350
    CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
    (1)
    The Companys Annual Report on
    Form 10-K
    for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the
    Form 10-K)
    fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
    15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
    amended; and(2)
    The information contained in the
    Form 10-K
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and results of operations of the Company.  Dated: March 8, 2011

/s/  M.
    Michael OwensM.
    Michael OwensVice President and Chief Financial Officer
No. 12-5042.

#### Leroy *v.*Hill, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
# C_2023216EN.01004601.xml

| 19.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 216/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 216/46

---

Judgment of the General Court of 26 April 2023 — Volkswagen v EUIPO — XTG (XTG)

(Case T-153/22) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark XTG - Earlier EU word mark GTX - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2023/C 216/61)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Volkswagen AG (Wolfsburg, Germany) (represented by: S. Machei and G. Orsoni, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Chylińska and T. Frydendahl, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: XTG S.A. (Wrocław, Poland)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 20 December 2021 (Case R 1387/2021-5).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Volkswagen AG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Volkswagen AG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 198, 16.5.2022.

---
Exhibit No. 11

                      HARDING LAWSON ASSOCIATES GROUP, INC.

                       Computation of Net Income Per Share
                      (In thousands, except per share data)
                                   (Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                       Three Months Ended                 Nine Months Ended
                                                         February 29/28,                   February 29/28,
                                                      2000           1999               2000              1999
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                   <C>            <C>               <C>              <C>
Weighted average basic shares outstanding              5,004          4,815             4,984            4,844
Net effect of dilutive stock options
     based on the treasury stock method                  141             15               166               46
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Total                                                  5,145          4,830             5,150            4,890
===================================================================================================================

Net income                                            $1,231         $  414            $3,950           $1,566
===================================================================================================================

Basic net income per share                            $ 0.25         $ 0.09            $ 0.79           $ 0.32
===================================================================================================================

Diluted net income per share                          $ 0.24         $ 0.09            $ 0.77           $ 0.32
===================================================================================================================
</TABLE>


                                       15
No. 12-5162.

#### Pate *v.*Tennessee.

Ct. Crim. App. Tenn. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       261,200
<OTHER-SE>                                   (261,200)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
No. 11-10809.

#### Johnson *v.*Sisto, Warden, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                                 PUBLICARD, INC
                            AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                          STATE OF JURISDICTION
SUBSIDIARY                                                    OF INCORPORATION
----------                                                ----------------------
<S>                                                       <C>
Amazing! Smart Card Technologies, Inc.                        California
Blackwold, Inc.                                               Delaware
Boxsterview, Inc.                                             Delaware
Continental Distilling Corporation                            Delaware
Darkrats, Inc.                                                Delaware
Fentronics, Inc.                                              Delaware
Greystone Peripherals, Inc.                                   California
Hanten Acquisition Co.                                        Delaware
Infineer, Inc.                                                Florida
Infineer Ltd.                                                 Northern Ireland
Kidde Systems, Inc.                                           Delaware
LTA Disposition Corporation                                   Delaware
Nevco Housewares, Inc.                                        Delaware
Orr-Schelen-Mayeron & Associates, Inc.                        Minnesota
Publicker Chemical Corporation                                Louisiana
Publicker Gasohol, Inc.                                       Delaware
Publicker, Inc.                                               Delaware
Redwold, Inc.                                                 Delaware
Rouglas-Dandall, Inc.                                         Delaware
Sagrocry, Inc.                                                Pennsylvania
</TABLE>