alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
On appellant’s petition for reconsideration filed June 7,

reconsideration allowed, former disposition withdrawn, former opinion (285 Or App 718, 398 P3d 444) modified and adhered to as modified, award of restitution reversed, remanded for entry of amended judgment omitting restitution award, otherwise affirmed August 9, 2017

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Plaintiff-Respondent, v.*CORINA SHOCKEY, *Defendant-Appellant.*

Wasco County Circuit Court

1400114M; A158354

399 P3d 491

Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Erin J. Snyder Severe, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, for petition.

Before Ortega, Presiding Judge, and Lagesen, Judge, and Garrett, Judge.

*238PER CURIAM

Defendant petitions for reconsideration of our decision in *State v. Shockey,*285 Or App 718, 398 P3d 444 (2017), in which we held that the statutory civil penalty for the unlawful taking of a raptor authorized by ORS 496.705 did not establish that the victim of defendant’s crime, the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW), had suffered economic damages so as to permit the award of restitution that the trial court ordered defendant to pay. We remanded for resentencing based on our determination that no other evidence supported the award of restitution to ODFW. Defendant points out that we concluded that there is no evidence to support a finding that ODFW suffered any economic damages as a result of defendant’s conduct and argues that that determination forecloses the trial court from imposing either restitution or a compensatory fine on remand. Thus, in defendant’s view, the proper disposition is to reverse the restitution award and remand for entry of an amended judgment omitting restitution. The state has not opposed the petition. Under those circumstances, we agree with defendants, allow reconsideration, and modify our opinion to provide for the following disposition: “Award of restitution reversed; remanded for entry of amended judgment omitting restitution award; otherwise affirmed.” To the extent our opinion refers to a remand for resentencing in other places, we disavow those references.

Reconsideration allowed; former disposition withdrawn; former opinion modified and adhered to as modified; award of restitution reversed; remanded for entry of amended judgment omitting restitution award; otherwise affirmed.
No. 11-11048.

#### Phillips *v.*United States.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                18 U.S.C.ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Galaxy  Nutritional  Foods, Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ended  June 30,  2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Angelo
S.  Morini,  Chairman,  President  and Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.


                                                     /s/ Angelo S. Morini
                                                     --------------------
                                                     Angelo S. Morini
                                                     Chairman, President and
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
                                                     August 5, 2002
# C_2022148EN.01002701.xml

| 4.4.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.4.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/27

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 11 February 2022 — Collard v Parliament and ID

(Case T-53/22 R)

(Interim measures - Law governing the institutions - Member of the Parliament - Suspension and exclusion of a Member from his political group - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Failure to comply with procedural requirements - Inadmissibility)

(2022/C 148/37)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Gilbert Collard (Vauvert, France) (represented by: B. Kuchukian, lawyer)

Defendants: European Parliament, Identity and Democracy political group (ID)

Re:

Application under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU for suspension of operation of the decision of the Bureau of the Parliament’s ‘Identity and Democracy’ political group (ID) of 22 January 2022 by which the applicant was suspended from that group and of the decision of the members of the ID political group of 25 January 2022 by which the applicant was excluded from that group.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
EX-10.50





 Certain identified information has been excluded from this exhibit because it is both not material and
is the type that the registrant treats as private or confidential. Information that was omitted has been noted in this document with a placeholder identified by the mark “[***]”. 

Exhibit 10.50 
 MUTUAL
TERMINATION OF THE 
 [***] SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY BOARD AGREEMENT 

This Mutual Termination of the [***] Scientific Advisory Board Agreement (“Mutual Termination”) is entered into as of March 17,
2018, and is by and between Caribou Biosciences, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Company”), and Jennifer A. Doudna, an individual (“Advisor”) (each herein referred to individually as a “Party,” or collectively as
the “Parties”). Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meaning set forth in the [***] Scientific Advisory Board Agreement. 

WHEREAS, the Parties desire to mutually terminate the [***] Scientific Advisory Board Agreement by and between Company and Advisor as
set forth herein; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual agreements contained in this Mutual Termination, and other good
and valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows: 
  

	 	1.	 The [***] Scientific Advisory Board Agreement, by and between Caribou and Advisor dated January 1, 2017,
is terminated effective March 31, 2018 (“Effective Termination Date”). Company will pay Advisor a final payment of thirty-one thousand, two hundred fifty U.S. dollars ($31,250) on or before the
Effective Termination Date, and no further monies shall be owed under the [***] Scientific Advisory Board Agreement. 


  

	 	2.	 The Parties acknowledge and ratify the survival provisions set forth in Section 5(E) of the [***]
Scientific Advisory Board Agreement. 


  

	 	3.	 Nothing in this Mutual Termination shall effect the Scientific Advisory Board Agreement between the Parties,
dated June 18, 2012, as amended. 


 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Mutual
Termination of the [***] Scientific Advisory Board Agreement. 
  

									
	Caribou Biosciences, Inc.	 		 	Jennifer A. Doudna
					
	By:	 	 /s/ Rachel E. Haurwitz
	 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Jennifer A. Doudna

		 	Rachel E. Haurwitz, Ph.D.	 		 		 	
		 	President & Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bitstream Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his or her knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act); and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                       |  |                                                                          |  |                  
|-------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | -----------------
|SIGNATURE                              |  | TITLE                                                                    |  | DATE             
|                                       |  |                                                                         
|/s/    Anna M. Chagnon Anna M. Chagnon |  | President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal
Executive Officer)      |  | November 14, 2008
|                                       |  |                                                                         
|/s/    James P. Dore James P. Dore     |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Financial Officer) |  | November 14, 2008

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to liability under that section. This certification shall not be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form with the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.
# C_2023296EN.01003202.xml

| 21.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 296/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 296/32

---

Order of the General Court of 29 June 2023 — Puma v EUIPO — Herno (HERZO)

(Case T-719/22) (1)

(Action for annulment - EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark HERZO - Earlier EU figurative mark HERNO - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2023/C 296/36)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Puma SE (Herzogenaurach, Germany) (represented by: M. Schunke and P. Trieb, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Herno SpA (Lesa, Italy)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 19 July 2022 (Case R 297/2022-1).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law.

| 2. | Each party shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Each party shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 15, 16.1.2023.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                                 5
<CIK>                                            0000818897
<NAME>                     Freshstart Venture Capital Corp.
<MULTIPLIER>                                              1
<CURRENCY>                                              USD

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                         6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                  JUN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                    NOV-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                           1
<CASH>                                            1,303,397
<SECURITIES>                                     23,524,145
<RECEIVABLES>                                       331,642
<ALLOWANCES>                                       (746,442)
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    249,667
<PP&E>                                               54,299
<DEPRECIATION>                                      (34,484)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   24,682,225
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             5,327,694
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             1,410,000
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                          7,070,542
<OTHER-SE>                                                0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     24,682,225
<SALES>                                           1,385,749
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  1,385,749
<CGS>                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    267,665
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    448,351
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  622,063
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      47,670
<INCOME-TAX>                                          1,732
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  45,938
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                         45,938
<EPS-BASIC>                                             .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           .01


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
balance sheets and statements of operations found on pages 3-5 of the
Company's Form 10-QSB for the year to date, and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              495
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        64,206
<OTHER-SE>                                     (64,701)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       495
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,831
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (2,831)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2,831)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 49 (Thursday, March 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 11848]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6244]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Meeting of the DOD Advisory Group on Electron Devices

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Advisory Group on Electron Devices.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The DoD Advisory Group on Electron Devices (AGED) announces a 
closed session meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held at 0900, Wednesday, 9 April 1997.

ADDRESS: The meeting will be held at Palisades Institute for Research 
Services, 1745 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 500, Arlington, VA 22202.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Eliot Cohen, AGED Secretariat, 
1745 Jefferson Davis Highway, Crystal Square Four, Suite 500, 
Arlington, Virginia 22202.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The mission of the Advisory Group is to 
provide advice to the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and 
Technology, to the Director of Defense Research and Engineering 
(DDR&E), and through DDR&E to the Director, Defense Advanced Research 
Projects Agency and the Military Departments in planning and managing 
an effective and economical research and development program in the 
area of electron devices.
    The AGED meeting will be limited to review of research and 
development programs which the Military Departments propose to initiate 
with industry, universities or in their laboratories. The agenda for 
this meeting will include programs on Radiation Hardened Devices, 
Microwave Tubes, Displays and Lasers. The review will include details 
of classified defense programs throughout.
    In accordance with section 10(d) of Pub. L. No. 92-463, as amended, 
(5 U.S.C. App. 10(d) (1994)), it has been determined that this Advisory 
Group meeting concerns matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) (1994), 
and that accordingly, this meeting will be closed to the public.

    Dated: March 7, 1997.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate, OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 97-6244 Filed 3-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 51 (Monday, March 17, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 12582]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6674]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Parts 1 and 301

[REG-208172-91]
RIN 1545-AU71


Basis Reduction Due to Discharge of Indebtedness; Hearing

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service, Treasury.

ACTION: Proposed rule; change of date and location of public hearing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document changes the date and location of the public 
hearing on the notice of proposed rulemaking relating to basis 
reduction due to discharge of indebtedness under sections 108 and 1017 
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

DATES: The public hearing is being held on Thursday, May 29, 1997, 
beginning at 10 a.m. Requests to speak and outlines of oral comments 
must be received by April 3, 1997.

ADDRESSES: The public hearing originally scheduled in the IRS 
Auditorium, Internal Revenue Building, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC is changed to the Commissioner's Conference Room, room 
3313, Internal Revenue Building, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Evangelista Lee of the Regulations 
Unit, Assistant Chief Counsel (Corporate), (202) 622-7180 (not a toll-
free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A notice of proposed rulemaking and notice 
of public hearing appearing in the Federal Register on Tuesday, January 
7, 1997, (62 FR 955) announced that a public hearing on proposed 
regulations relating to the basis reduction due to discharge of 
indebtedness under sections 108 and 1017 would be held on Thursday, 
April 24, 1997, beginning at 10 a.m. in the IRS Auditorium, Internal 
Revenue Building, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC and 
that requests to speak and outlines of oral comments should be received 
by Thursday, April 3, 1997.
    The date and location of the public hearing has changed. The 
hearing is scheduled for Thursday, May 29, 1997, beginning at 10 a.m. 
in the Commissioner's Conference Room, room 3313, Internal Revenue 
Building, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. We must 
receive requests to speak and outlines of oral comments by Thursday, 
April 3, 1997. Because of the controlled access restrictions, attenders 
are not admitted beyond the lobby of the Internal Revenue Building 
until 9:45 a.m.
    The Service will prepare an agenda showing the scheduling of the 
speakers after the outlines are received from the persons testifying 
and make copies available free of charge at the hearing.
Cynthia E. Grigsby,
Chief, Regulations Unit, Assistant Chief Counsel (Corporate).
[FR Doc. 97-6674 Filed 3-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-U
#### IN RE: NOMINATION PAPERS OF AMATO (HERBERT ET AL.)

1406 CD 2017

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

10/23/2017

Berks County Civil Division, 17-15167

Affirmed
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6145

CARLTON DALE WALL,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

DEAN WALKER,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Paul Trevor Sharp, Magistrate

Judge. (CA-00-807)

Submitted: May 8, 2001 Decided: May 21, 2001

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carlton Dale Wall, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* The parties consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate

judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).

2

PER CURIAM:

Carlton Dale Wall seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 2000).* We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on

the reasoning of the magistrate judge. See Wall v. Walker, No. CA00-807 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 8, 2001). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED