alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2022424EN.01005101.xml

| 7.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 424/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 424/51

---

Action brought on 22 September 2022 — Liquid Advertising v EUIPO — Liqui.do (Liquid+Arcade)

(Case T-592/22)

(2022/C 424/64)

Language in which the application was lodged: Polish

Parties

Applicant: Liquid Advertising, Inc. (El Segundo, California, United States) (represented by: M. Czarnecki, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Liqui.do SA (Lisbon, Portugal)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘Liquid+Arcade’ — Application No 18 317 971

Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 28 June 2022 in Case R 2231/2021-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul, in their entirety, the contested decision and the decision of EUIPO’s Opposition Division of 12 November 2021 or, in the alternative, amend the contested decision by upholding the appeal lodged by the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul, in their entirety, the contested decision and the decision of EUIPO’s Opposition Division of 12 November 2021 or, in the alternative, amend the contested decision by upholding the appeal lodged by the applicant;

| — | make an appropriate order as to costs in the applicant’s favour. |
| --- | --- |

—

make an appropriate order as to costs in the applicant’s favour.

Plea in law

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
Exhibit 32.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Galaxy Nutritional Foods, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Salvatore J. Furnari, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.




                                        /s/ Salvatore J. Furnari
                                        ---------------------------------
                                        Salvatore J. Furnari
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        February 14, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0000818029
<NAME>                        International Precious Metals Corporation

<CURRENCY>                    Canadian dollar
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                     0.7253         
<CASH>                                             815,000    
<SECURITIES>                                             0    
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0    
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0    
<INVENTORY>                                              0    
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,033,000    
<PP&E>                                           1,822,000    
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  60,598,000    
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,424,000    
<BONDS>                                                  0    
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0    
<PREFERRED>                                              0    
<COMMON>                                        20,913,534    
<OTHER-SE>                                               0    
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    60,598,000    
<SALES>                                                  0    
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0    
<CGS>                                                    0    
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,596,000    
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0    
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0    
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (3,450,000)   
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0    
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (3,450,000)   
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0    
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0    
<CHANGES>                                                0    
<NET-INCOME>                                    (3,450,000)   
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           (0.19)
                                                             
                                                             

</TABLE>
EX-10.3(d)



 Exhibit 10.3(d) 

June 1, 2013 
 Aventis Asset Management, LLC 

2150 E. Lake Cook Road, Suite 720 
 Buffalo Grove, IL 60089 

Attention: Mr. Steve Hwang 
  

	 	Re:	Management Agreement Renewals 

 Dear Mr. Hwang: 

We are writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the commodity pools to which reference is made below (the “Management
Agreements”). We are extending the term of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2014 and all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged. 

 

	 	•	 	Commodity Advisors Fund LP. 

  

	 	•	 	MB Master Fund L.P. 

  

	 	•	 	Institutional Futures Portfolio L.P. 

  

	 	•	 	MSSB Spectrum Strategic L.P. 

  

	 	•	 	Managed Futures Premier Aventis II, L.P. 

  

	 	•	 	Managed Futures Premier Aventis L.P. 

 Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of
this letter and returning it to the attention of Mr. Damian George at the address above or fax to 212-296-6868. If you have any questions I can be reached at 212-296-1292. 

 

			
	Very truly yours,
	
	CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Damian George

		 	Damian George
		 	Chief Financial Officer & Director
	
	AVENTIS ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Steven Hwang



			
	Print Name:	 	 Steven Hwang, coo/Head of Marketing


 DG/sr
Exhibit No. 11

                      HARDING LAWSON ASSOCIATES GROUP, INC.

                        Computation of Per Share Earnings
                      (In thousands, except per share data)
                                   (Unaudited)


                                          Three Months Ended  Nine Months Ended
                                          Feb. 28,  Feb. 29,  Feb. 28,  Feb. 29,
                                             1997      1996      1997      1996
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PRIMARY
  Average shares outstanding                4,942     4,845     4,938     4,817
  Net effect of dilutive stock options
    based on the treasury stock
    method (or modified treasury stock
    method) using the average market price     31        21        25        30
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

      TOTAL                                 4,974     4,866     4,963     4,847
================================================================================

  Net income                               $  462    $   79    $1,438    $1,973
================================================================================

  Net income per share                     $  .09    $  .02    $  .29    $  .41
================================================================================
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Resource America, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Edward E. Cohen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





                               /s/ Edward E. Cohen
                               ------------------------
                               Edward E. Cohen
                               Chief Executive Officer
                               January 28, 2004
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 RAVEN INDUSTRIES, INC.
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Raven Industries, Inc.
  /s/ Ronald M. MoquistRonald M. MoquistPresident and Chief Executive Officer
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8697 

To direct the Director of National Intelligence to submit to State election 

officials and Congress annual reports on pre-election threats for general 

elections for Federal office. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 27, 2020 

Miss RICE of New York introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence 

A BILL 

To direct the Director of National Intelligence to submit 

to State election officials and Congress annual reports 

on pre-election threats for general elections for Federal 

office. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Election Security As5 sessments Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ANNUAL REPORTS ON PRE-ELECTION THREATS. 

7 Not later than January 30, 2020, and annually there8 after, the Director of National Intelligence shall submit 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8697 IH

1 an assessment of the full scope of threats to election infra2 structure, including cybersecurity threats posed by State 

3 actors and terrorist groups, and recommendations to ad4 dress or mitigate the threats, as developed by the Sec5 retary and Chairman, to— 

6 (1) the chief State election official of each 

7 State; 

8 (2) the Committees on Homeland Security and 

9 House Administration of the House of Representa10 tives and the Committees on Homeland Security and 

11 Governmental Affairs and Rules and Administration 

12 of the Senate; and 

13 (3) any other appropriate congressional com14 mittees. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
No. 11-10522.

#### Rowe *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
# C_2022171EN.01001601.xml

| 25.4.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.4.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/16

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Málaga (Spain) lodged on 17 January 2022 — Cajasur Banco, S. A. v JO and IM

(Case C-35/22)

(2022/C 171/20)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Audiencia Provincial de Málaga

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Cajasur Banco, S. A.

Respondents: JO and IM

Questions referred

| 1. | Is it contrary to the right to effective judicial protection and Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union to require that, before instituting legal proceedings, the consumer must first have issued an out-of-court demand for payment in order for the declaration as to the invalidity of a particular general condition of contract on grounds of unfairness to give rise to all of the compensatory effects (including the costs of the legal proceedings) associated with such invalidity, pursuant to Article 6(1) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts? (1) |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is it contrary to the right to effective judicial protection and Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union to require that, before instituting legal proceedings, the consumer must first have issued an out-of-court demand for payment in order for the declaration as to the invalidity of a particular general condition of contract on grounds of unfairness to give rise to all of the compensatory effects (including the costs of the legal proceedings) associated with such invalidity, pursuant to Article 6(1) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts? (1)

| 2. | Is it compatible with the right to full compensation and the effectiveness of European Union law and Article 6(1) of the aforementioned directive to make the imposition of costs (including legal fees) subject to a condition based on the existence of a prior out-of-court demand for payment issued by the consumer to the financial institution with a view to the removal of that term? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Is it compatible with the right to full compensation and the effectiveness of European Union law and Article 6(1) of the aforementioned directive to make the imposition of costs (including legal fees) subject to a condition based on the existence of a prior out-of-court demand for payment issued by the consumer to the financial institution with a view to the removal of that term?

---

(1)  OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29.

---
No. 11-10945.

#### Chandler *v.*Tucker, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
# C_2023179EN.01001203.xml

| 22.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/12

---

Appeal brought on 18 July 2022 by KQ against the order of the General Court (President) delivered on 19 May 2022 in Case T-122/22 AJ, KQ v Council of the European Union, European Commission, European External Action Service (EEAS) and Eulex Kosovo

(Case C-488/22 P)

(2023/C 179/18)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: KQ (represented by: P. Koutrakos, dikigoros, F. Randolph, advocaat, and J. Stojsavljevic-Savic, Solicitor)

Other parties to the proceedings: Council of the European Union, European Commission, European External Action Service (EEAS), Eulex Kosovo

By order of 31 March 2023, the Court of Justice (Sixth Chamber) held that the appeal was dismissed due to a manifest lack of jurisdiction of the Court and that KQ should bear her own costs.

---
# C_2022213EN.01004101.xml

| 30.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 213/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 213/41

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 30 March 2022 — RT France v Council

(Case T-125/22 R)

(Interim relief - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine - Suspension of the broadcasting activities of certain media - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency - Weighing of competing interests)

(2022/C 213/57)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: RT France (Boulogne-Billancourt, France) (represented by: E. Piwnica, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: S. Lejeune, R. Meyer and S. Emmerechts, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Articles 278 and 279 TFEU for suspension of the operation of Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/351 of 1 March 2022 amending Decision 2014/512/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2022 L 65, p. 5) and of Council Regulation (EU) 2022/350 of 1 March 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia's actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2022 L 65, p. 1), in so far as those acts concern the applicant.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim relief is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim relief is dismissed.

| 2. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the applications for leave to intervene submitted by the European Commission, the Kingdom of Belgium, the French Republic and the Republic of Poland. |
| --- | --- |

2.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the applications for leave to intervene submitted by the European Commission, the Kingdom of Belgium, the French Republic and the Republic of Poland.

| 3. | The costs are reserved save for those incurred by the European Commission, the Kingdom of Belgium, the French Republic and the Republic of Poland. Those parties shall bear the costs in the context of their application for leave to intervene. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The costs are reserved save for those incurred by the European Commission, the Kingdom of Belgium, the French Republic and the Republic of Poland. Those parties shall bear the costs in the context of their application for leave to intervene.

---
FILED

December 3, 1997

Cecil W. Crowson

Appellate Court Clerk

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE

MAY SESSION, 1997

JAMES A. BROWN, JR., ) C.C.A. NO. 01C01-9606-CC-00232

)

Appellant, )

)

) DICKSON COUNTY

VS. )

) HON. ROBERT E. BURCH. JUDGE

STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) and LEONARD W. MARTIN, JUDGE

)

Appellee. ) (Post Conviction - Sentencing)

FOR THE APPELLANT: FOR THE APPELLEE:

JAMES A. BROWN, JR. Pro Se JOHN KNOX WALKUP

Middle Tennessee Reception Center Attorney General and Reporter

7177 Cockrill Bend-Industrial Rd.

Nashville, TN 37209-1005 CLINTON J. MORGAN

Assistant Attorney General

450 James Robertson Parkway

Nashville, TN 37243

DAN ALSOBROOKS

District Attorney General

BOB WILSON

Assistant District Attorney

P. O. Box 580

Charlotte, TN 37036

OPINION FILED ________________________

AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 20

JERRY L. SMITH, JUDGE
-2-

OPINION

In this appeal of the summary dismissal of his post-conviction petition

Appellant, James A. Brown, Jr., asks this Court to review the validity of his

conviction entered upon his pleas of guilty on February 20, 1991. Appellant

pleaded guilty to nine (9) county of felony theft and one (1) count of misdemeanor

theft. As part of the plea agreement Appellant received sentences totaling 32

years with eight years to be served in community corrections and the balance on

probation. Appellant apparently performed in a satisfactory manner while on

comm unity corrections and he was placed on probation sooner than expected.

However, on June 19, 1995, Appellant’s probation was revoked and he was

placed in the Department of Correction. 

Although acknowledging his post-conviction petition was time-barred under

the three year statute of limitations in effect when his conviction became final,

Appellant argues that the enactment on May 10, 1995, of the new one year

statute of limitations for post-conviction petitions creates a new one year period

in which he may file for post-conviction relief. Our State Supreme Court has only

recently resolved this issue adversely to Appellant’s position. Carter v. State,

Monroe Co., No. 03-S-01-9612-CR-00117 (Tenn. S. Ct. September 8, 1997, at

Knoxville). Thus the petition for post-conviction relief was properly dismissed.

In addition, following the revocation of his probation on June 10, 1995,

Appellant moved the trial court pursuant to Tenn. R. Crim. P. 35 to reduce his

sentence. Appellant offered no evidence as to why his agreed to sentence

should be reduced, he merely stated he felt it was too harsh. The motion for
-3-

sentence reduction was denied. Under the circum stances we see no reason to

disturb this discretionary decision of the trial judge.

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed in all respects

pursuant to Rule 20, Rules of the Court of Criminal Appeals.

____________________________________

JERRY L. SMITH, JUDGE

CONCUR:

___________________________________

PAUL G. SUMMERS, JUDGE

___________________________________

DAVID G. HAYES, JUDGE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE REPORT
ON FORM 10-Q BAY RESOURCES LTD. FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> AUSTRALIAN DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                 0.5407
<CASH>                                               8
<SECURITIES>                                        49
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     8
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      57
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              250
<BONDS>                                            430
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,155
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        57
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   161
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  14
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (175)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (175)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (175)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>