alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2022441EN.01002701.xml

| 21.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 441/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 441/27

---

Action brought on 30 September 2022 — Marico v EUIPO — Regal Impex (SAFFOLA)

(Case T-611/22)

(2022/C 441/37)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Marico Ltd (Mumbai, India) (represented by: B. Collett and S. Malynicz, Barristers-at-Law)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Regal Impex Ltd (Harrow, United Kingdom)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark SAFFOLA — European Union trade mark No 12 568 739

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 July 2022 in Case R 1538/2021-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO and the intervener, should the other party to the proceedings before EUIPO decide to intervene, to pay the applicant’s costs and bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and the intervener, should the other party to the proceedings before EUIPO decide to intervene, to pay the applicant’s costs and bear their own costs.

Pleas in law

| — | The Board of Appeal infringed Article 18(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council by wrongly concluding that the European Union trade mark proprietor had demonstrated genuine use of the contested mark in respect of ‘edible oils and fats’; |
| --- | --- |

—

The Board of Appeal infringed Article 18(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council by wrongly concluding that the European Union trade mark proprietor had demonstrated genuine use of the contested mark in respect of ‘edible oils and fats’;

| — | The Board of Appeal erred evidentially, procedurally and legally in respect of the finding that sunflower oil is an edible fat. |
| --- | --- |

—

The Board of Appeal erred evidentially, procedurally and legally in respect of the finding that sunflower oil is an edible fat.

---
AFS-11-462-E September 29, 2011 Exemption No. 8676C Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2005-22250

Mr. Eric Lambert Vice President/Director of Operations NetJets Aviation, Inc. 4111 Bridgeway Avenue Columbus, OH 43219

Dear Mr. Lambert:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 8676, as amended. It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists the

conditions and limitations.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated Septem ber 15, 2011, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of NetJets Aviation, Inc. (NetJets), for an extension of Exemption No. 8676, as amended. That exemption from § 91.205(b)(12) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations allows NetJets to operate over water and beyond power-off gliding distance from shore without at least one pyrotechnic signaling device.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to NetJets.2

Our Decision

The FAA has determ ined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 8676, as amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition, subject to the following conditions

and limitations.

Conditions and Limitations

1. Each flight operated under this exemption must be conducted in compliance with §§ 121.125(a)(1), (2), (c) and (d); 121.127(a)(1), (2), and (b); 121.597(a), (b), and (c); and 121.689(a), (b), and (c).

2. Each flight operated under part 135 must be conducted in accordance with NetJets operations specifications.

3. Each flight operated under part 91K must be conducted in accordance with NetJets management specifications.

4. Prior to conducting operations under this exemption, NetJets must obtain amended operations specifications, and management specifications listing this exemption.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the term ination date of Exemption No. 8676, as amended, to January 31, 2014, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John W. McGraw Acting Director, Flight Standards

Service3
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 47 (Tuesday, March 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 11221]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6062]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[ES-960-1910-00-4377; ES-48641, Group 171, Minnesota]


Notice of Filing of Plat of Survey; Minnesota

    The plat of the dependent resurvey of a portion of the 
subdivisional lines, and the partial subdivision of section 24, 
Township 64 North, Range 5 East, Fourth Principal Meridian, Minnesota, 
will be officially filed in Eastern States, Springfield, Virginia at 
7:30 a.m., on April 17, 1997.
    The survey was requested by the Bureau of Indian Affairs.
    All inquiries or protests concerning the technical aspects of the 
survey must be sent to the Chief Cadastral Surveyor, Eastern States, 
Bureau of Land Management, 7450 Boston Boulevard, Springfield, Virginia 
22153, prior to 7:30 a.m., April 17, 1997.
    Copies of the plat will be made available upon request and 
prepayment of the reproduction fee of $2.75 per copy.

    Dated: March 3, 1997.
Stephen G. Kopach,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor.
[FR Doc. 97-6062 Filed 3-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GJ-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         530,269
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  179,235
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      12,487,036
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,030,680
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,563,068
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          601,206
<BONDS>                                      6,163,254
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,311,102
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,563,068
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,062,360
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,104,781
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             239,675
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (627,596)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (627,596)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (627,596)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (55.76)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Form 10-K for the twelve months ended December 31, 1995 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1995  
<PERIOD-START>                           JAN-01-1995  
<PERIOD-END>                             DEC-31-1995  
<CASH>                                        26,919
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 19,162
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   0
<PP&E>                                     1,855,866
<DEPRECIATION>                                81,979
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             1,840,999
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              0
<BONDS>                                      158,054
<COMMON>                                      72,376
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                  335,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   868,292
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               1,840,999
<SALES>                                      262,473
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             264,873
<CGS>                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 82,720
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 420
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            19,584
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               81,696
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           81,696
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                  81,696
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   0.93
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   0.93
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Knickerbocker Capital Corp. for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, I certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:  (1)the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Knickerbocker Capital Corp. for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Knickerbocker Capital Corp..    By:/s/ Dempsey MorkName:Dempsey MorkTitle:Principal Executive Officer,
and DirectorDate:Nov. 19, 2009By:/s/ Dempsey MorkName:Dempsey MorkTitle:Principal Financial OfficerDate:Nov. 19, 2009
EX-10.6



 Exhibit 10.6 

AMENDMENT TO 
 SYNDAX
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. 
 2007 STOCK PLAN 

WHEREAS, by written consent of the board of directors (the “Board”) of Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
“Company”) adopted on January 17, 2014 and by written consent of the stockholders of the Company dated as of January 23, 2014, the Board and stockholders of the Company approved an amendment to the Company’s 2007
Stock Plan (the “Plan”) to amend the number of shares of the Company’s common stock that may be issued pursuant to awards granted under the Plan from 10,012,178 (which number of shares reserved under the Plan reflects a
1-for-10 reverse stock split of Common Stock effected by the Company on November 18, 2013) to 12,327,178. 
 The Plan is hereby amended
in the following respects: 
 Effective as of January 23, 2014, Section 3 of the Plan is amended and restated in its entirely to
read as follows: 
 “3. Stock Subject to the Plan. Subject to the provisions of Section 14 of the Plan, the maximum
aggregate number of Shares that may be sold under the Plan is 12,327,178. The Shares may be authorized, but unissued, or reacquired Common Stock. If an award should expire or become unexercisable for any reason without having been exercised in full,
or is surrendered pursuant to an Option Exchange Program, the unpurchased Shares that were subject thereto shall, unless the Plan shall have been terminated, become available for future grant under the Plan. In addition, any Shares of Common Stock
which are retained by the Company upon exercise of an award in order to satisfy the exercise or purchase price for such award or any withholding taxes due with respect to such exercise or purchase shall be treated as not issued and shall continue to
be available under the Plan. Shares issued under the Plan and later repurchased by the Company pursuant to any repurchase right which the Company may have shall be available for future grant under the Plan.” 

[Signature Page Follows] 







 To record the adoption of this Amendment to the Plan, the Company has caused its undersigned
officer to execute this document as of the date first written above. 
  

			
	SYNDAX PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Arlene M. Morris

	Name:	 	Arlene M. Morris
	Title:	 	President and Chief Executive Officer
MD4-3000

SPECIFICATIONS

Technical drawing md4-3000 (PDF)

• Rate of climb: 10 m/s

• Operating speed: 16.0 m/s

• Maximum thrust: 280 N

• Weight: ca. 10,400 g (depending on configuration)

• Recommended load: 3,000 g

• Maximum load: 4,000 g
• Maximum take-off weight (MTOW): 15,000 g

• Dimensions: 2052 mm x 1888 mm (from rotor hub to rotor hub)

• Flying time: up to 45 minutes (depending on load / wind / battery)

• Battery: 6S2P LiPo, 22.2V, 13000mAh

• Flat core motors: yes

• CFD optimised propeller: yes

• Closed carbon housing: yes

• IP43 protection: yes

• Temperature: -10 bis 50 °C

• Humidity: max 90% r.H.

• Wind susceptibility: vibration-free images up to 6 m/s

• Flight range: min. 500 m with remote control, with WP up to 50 km

• Service ceiling: 4,000m ASL

• Start altitude: up to 4,000 m NN (WGS84)
September 19, 2012

No. 12A234.

#### League of United Latin American Citizens *v.*Perry, Governor of Texas, et al.

D. C. W. D. Tex. Application for stay, presented to Justice Scalia, and by him referred to the Court, denied.
No. 11-10666.

#### Fulbright *v.*Cate, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
##### 



EXHIBIT 12.2 ARCHSTONE-SMITH OPERATING TRUST
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES
AND PREFERRED UNIT DISTRIBUTIONS(Dollar amounts in thousands) (Unaudited) Years Ended December 31,2003 (1)
    
    2002 (1)
    
    2001 (1)
    
    2000 (1)
    
    1999 (1)Earnings from operations
    
    $
    108,262
    
    
    $
    127,619
    
    
    $
    130,070
    
    
    $
    139,295
    
    
    $
    140,920Add:Interest expense
    
    
    186,832
    
    
    
    190,005
    
    
    
    88,081
    
    
    
    107,231
    
    
    
    94,471Earnings as adjusted
    
    $
    295,094
    
    
    $
    317,624
    
    
    $
    218,151
    
    
    $
    246,526
    
    
    $
    235,391Combined fixed charges and
Preferred Unit distributions:Interest expense
    
    $
    186,832
    
    
    $
    190,005
    
    
    $
    88,081
    
    
    $
    107,231
    
    
    $
    94,471Capitalized interest
    
    
    26,854
    
    
    
    32,377
    
    
    
    31,600
    
    
    
    37,079
    
    
    
    41,099Total fixed charges
    
    
    213,686
    
    
    
    222,382
    
    
    
    119,681
    
    
    
    144,310
    
    
    
    135,570Preferred Unit distributions
    
    
    20,997
    
    
    
    32,185
    
    
    
    25,877
    
    
    
    25,340
    
    
    
    23,733Combined fixed charges and
Preferred Unit distributions
    
    $
    234,683
    
    
    $
    254,567
    
    
    $
    145,558
    
    
    $
    169,650
    
    
    $
    159,303Ratio of earnings to
combined fixed charges and
Preferred Unit distributions
    
    
    1.3
    
    
    
    1.2
    
    
    
    1.5
    
    
    
    1.5
    
    
    
    1.5
   (1)
    
    Net earnings from discontinued operations have been reclassified for
all years presented.   91
# C_2023155EN.01005501.xml

| 2.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/55

---

Judgment of the General Court of 8 March 2023 — Kanyama v Council

(Case T-95/22) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo - Freezing of funds - Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States - Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered - Right to be heard - Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded - Manifest error of assessment - Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures)

(2023/C 155/71)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Célestin Kanyama (Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo) (represented by: T. Bontinck, P. De Wolf, A. Guillerme and T. Payan, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M.-C. Cadilhac and S. Lejeune, acting as Agents)

Re:

By his action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment, first, of Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/2181 of 9 December 2021 amending Decision 2010/788/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic Republic of the Congo (OJ 2021 L 443, p. 75) and, second, of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2177 of 9 December 2021, implementing Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against persons acting in violation of the arms embargo with regard to the Democratic Republic of the Congo (OJ 2021 L 443, p. 3), in so far as those acts concern him.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Célestin Kanyama to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Célestin Kanyama to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 148, 4.4.2022.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE SIX
MONTHS ENDED 6-30-00 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES THERETO CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S QUARTERLY
REPORT ON FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000818813
<NAME> BITSTREAM INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           8,152
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,584
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,277
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,352
<PP&E>                                           3,447
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,755
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  13,389
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,762
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               78
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,508
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    13,389
<SALES>                                          4,652
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,652
<CGS>                                              759
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      759
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,496)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       132
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,628)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,628)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.21)


</TABLE>
# C_2022257EN.01004101.xml

| 4.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 257/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 257/41

---

Action brought on 16 May 2022 — Consulta v EUIPO — Karlinger (ACASA)

(Case T-267/22)

(2022/C 257/53)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Consulta GmbH (Cham, Switzerland) (represented by: M. Kinkeldey and S. Brandstätter, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Mario Karlinger (Sölden, Austria)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ACASA — EU trade mark No 7 587 165

Proceedings before EUIPO: Invalidity proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 January 2022 in Case R 487/2021-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 59(1)(a) read in conjunction with Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 59(1)(a) read in conjunction with Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 72(2) read in conjunction with Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 72(2) read in conjunction with Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of the principles developed in the case-law of the General Court of the European Union on the interpretation of those provisions of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of the principles developed in the case-law of the General Court of the European Union on the interpretation of those provisions of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---