### 43183 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 139 / Friday, July 19, 2013 / Notices

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.

• Mail: Federal Docket Management System Office, 4800 Mark Center Drive, East Tower, Suite 02G09, Alexandria, VA 22350–3100.

Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name, docket number and title for this Federal Register document. The general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the Internet at http:// www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, including any personal identifiers or contact information.

Any associated form(s) for this collection may be located within this same electronic docket and downloaded for review/testing. Follow the instructions at http:// www.regulations.gov for submitting comments. Please submit comments on any given form identified by docket number, form number, and title.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  To request more information on this proposed information collection or to obtain a copy of the proposal and associated collection instruments, please write to the Defense Finance and Accounting Services—Columbus, Ohio, 3990 E. Broad Street, Columbus, Ohio 43216, ATTN: Ms. Kenna Robinett, Account Management and Provisioning System (AMPS) Program Manager, Enterprise Systems. Telephone: (614) 701–2451 or Mr. Marcus Ritter, Project Manager, (317–212–6547); and Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), AMPS Program Manager, Mr. Walter B. Gooch, System Manager, Branch Chief, External Solutions, DLA Richmond VA, 8000 Jefferson Davis Highway, Richmond, Virginia 23237. Telephone: (804) 279–

3075.

Title; Associated Form; and OMB Number: Account Management and Provisioning System (AMPS); OMB Control Number: 0730–TBD.

Needs and Uses: The information collection requirement is necessary to maintain information for operations to control and track access to secure networks, computer systems, and databases. Records are maintained on electronic storage media. The SSNs are used to allow Non-DoD individuals to create a user account within AMPS, and for AMPS to track those users. Additionally, the SSN is used for systems that limit system rights based on that number. For example, in the Defense Civilian Pay System (DCPS), a user is not allowed to access their pay records, and that is managed through the SSN.

Affected Public: Individuals or Households

Annual Burden Hours: 209 hours Number of Respondents: 2500 Responses per Respondent: 1 Average Burden per Response: 5 minutes

Frequency: On occasion

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  Summary of Information Collection

AMPS does not extract or interface with any other system to obtain PII information for users. All users are required to set-up a user account to use AMPS. AMPS is Common Access Card (CAC) enabled and DoD employees will access AMPS via their CAC. AMPS can extract user data from the Electronic Data Interchange-Personnel Identifier (EDI/PI) to help set-up the user account. Any user that is not issued a CAC will enter their information into AMPS to create a user account, and will be given a user ID and password to access the system.

The following are examples of information collected from users: User names; SSN (for individuals not in possession of a CAC such as newly hired Federal employees); U.S. citizenship status (i.e., U.S. Citizen, Foreign National, other); physical and electronic address; work telephone numbers; organization; office symbol; contractor/employee status; computer logon addresses, passwords, and user identification codes; type of access/ permissions required; verification of need to know; dates of mandatory information assurance awareness training; and security clearance data. The system also captures details about programs, databases, functions, and sites accessed and/or used; dates and times of use; and information products created, received, or altered during use. The records may also contain details about access or functionality problems telephoned in for technical support along with resolution. For individuals who telecommute from home or a telework center, the records may contain the electronic address and telephone number at that location. For contractors, the system also contains the company name, contract number, and contract expiration date.

Dated: July 11, 2013. Aaron Siegel, Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 2013–17376 Filed 7–18–13; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 5001–06–P DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE** 

**Office of the Secretary**

**[Docket ID DoD–2013–OS–0090]**

**Notice of Availability for Sharpe Permit Relinquishment Project Environmental**  **Assessment Finding of No Significant Impact** 

**AGENCY :**  Defense Logistics Agency, DoD.

**ACTION :**  Notice of Availability (NOA) for Sharpe Permit Relinquishment Project Environmental Assessment (EA) Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI).

**SUMMARY :**  On April 30, 2013, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) published a NOA in the Federal Register (78 FR 25258–25259) announcing the publication of the Sharpe Permit Relinquishment Project EA. The EA was available for a 30-day public comment period which ended May 30, 2013. The EA was prepared as required under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4331 et seq.). No comments were received during the comment period. This FONSI documents the decision of DLA to relinquish the permit for use and occupancy of the Sharpe Army Depot, currently known as Defense Distribution Depot San Joaquin, California—Sharpe (Sharpe Site) with a determination that no significant impacts on the human environment are associated with this decision.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Defense Distribution Depot San Joaquin, California—Sharpe Public Affairs Office, P.O. Box 960001, Stockton, CA 95296–0001, ATTN: Sharpe Permit Relinquishment Project. (209) 839–4226. DDJCPublicAffairsOffice@dla.mil

. **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  DLA has occupied the Sharpe Site since 1990 under a Memorandum of Agreement with the U.S. Department of the Army (Army). DLA is proposing to move its operations from the Sharpe Site to its Defense Distribution Depot San Joaquin, California—Tracy (Tracy Site). Currently, DLA has co-existing operations at both facilities. Consolidation of operations at one facility would increase efficiency of DLA operations by reducing redundancies, thereby reducing operational costs.

Purpose and Need for Action: The purpose of the Sharpe Permit Relinquishment Project is to return the land and improvements at the Sharpe Site to the Army as DLA has proposed consolidation of its operations from the Sharpe Site to its nearby Tracy Site.


### 43184 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 139 / Friday, July 19, 2013 / Notices

Consolidation of the operations into one facility increases efficiency of DLA operations and reduces operational costs. The consolidation would not substantially alter other non-DLA operations at the Sharpe site and the federal government will continue ongoing environmental restoration efforts at the Sharpe Site following the permit relinquishment.

Proposed Action and Alternatives: Under the proposed action, DLA would relinquish occupancy and use of the property and return the Sharpe Site to the Army who owns the land and the improvements thereon. DLA wants to consolidate activities currently performed at the Sharpe Site to its existing facilities at the Tracy Site and potentially other DLA facilities. Land and improvements associated with the property would be conveyed back to the Army. The Army would assume all management responsibilities associated with the property. No new construction or ground disturbing activities at the Tracy Site would result from the proposed action. As an alternative to the proposed action, DLA considered taking no action. The no action alternative would have maintained existing conditions through continued occupancy and use of the facility by DLA. Under this alternative, the Army would not resume occupancy and use of the property and DLA would continue to operate the facility until the conclusion of its current permit on April 11, 2020. The no action alternative would not satisfy the project’s purpose and need; however, the alternative was included in the environmental analysis to provide a baseline for comparison with the proposed action and was analyzed in accordance with Council on Environmental Quality regulations for implementing NEPA.

An additional alternative was considered, but eliminated from further consideration. This alternative included relocating Sharpe operations to a nearby commercially available site. This alternative was dismissed from further consideration because there would be additional security risks associated with operations conducted at non-secured facilities, as well as additional operational costs.

Potential Environmental Impacts: Potential environmental impacts of the proposed action have been assessed and compared to the impacts of the no action alternative. The proposed action is expected to have the following impacts:

• Minor short-term adverse impacts to air quality, noise, and traffic during the transportation of supplies and materials from the Sharpe Site to other DLA facilities.

• A reduction in traffic at the Sharpe Site, which would lessen potential traffic-related affects to burrowing owls with a long-term negligible beneficial impact on the biological resources at the Sharpe Site.

• A reduction in the work force at the Sharpe Site and an increased work force at the Tracy Site. As such, there would be a long-term negligible adverse impact on the socioeconomic resources on the local Lathrop area and a long-term negligible beneficial impact on the socioeconomic resources on the local Tracy area.

• A temporary increase in economic activities resulting in a short-term and negligible economic beneficial impact for the local economies.

Determination: DLA has determined that implementation of the proposed action will not have a significant effect on the human environment. Human environment was interpreted comprehensively to include the natural and physical environment and the relationship of people with that environment. Specifically, no highly uncertain or controversial impacts, unique or unknown risks, or cumulatively significant effects were identified. Implementation of the proposed action will not result in the loss or destruction of significant scientific, cultural, or historic resources and implementation of the proposed action will not violate any federal, state, or local laws. Based on the results of the analyses performed during the preparation of the environmental assessment, David Rodriquez, Director, DLA Installation Support, concludes the proposed action to relinquish the permit to use and occupy the Sharpe site does not constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the context of the NEPA. Therefore, an environmental impact statement for the proposed action is not required.

Dated: July 16, 2013. Aaron Siegel, Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 2013–17377 Filed 7–18–13; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 5001–06–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE**

**Office of the Secretary**

**Defense Business Board; Notice of Federal Advisory Committee Meeting** 

**AGENCY :**  DoD. **ACTION :**  Meeting notice; cancellation.

**SUMMARY :**  On Tuesday, July 9, 2013 (78 FR 41042), the Department of Defense published a notice announcing a July 25, 2013 meeting of the Defense Business Board. This notice announces that the Defense Business Board meeting scheduled for Thursday, July 25, 2013 is hereby cancelled. The Board will not have any completed studies to outbrief and deliberate on. Therefore, to conserve financial resources, the meeting is cancelled. The next Quarterly Board Meeting will be held on October 17, 2013.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Ms. Phyllis Ferguson, Phyllis.Ferguson@osd.mil, 703–695– 7563 or Ms. Debora Duffy, Debora.Duffy@osd.mil, (703) 697–2168.

Dated: July 16, 2013. Aaron Siegel, Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 2013–17369 Filed 7–18–13; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 5001–06–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE**

**Office of the Secretary**

**Meeting of the National Commission on the Structure of the Air Force** 

**AGENCY :**  Director of Administration and Management, DoD.

**ACTION :**  Notice of Advisory Committee Meeting.

**SUMMARY :**  Under the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) of 1972 (5 U.S.C., Appendix, as amended), the Government in the Sunshine Act of 1976 (5 U.S.C. 552b, as amended), and 41 CFR 102–3.150, the Department of Defense (DoD) announces that the following Federal advisory committee meeting of the National Commission on the Structure of the Air Force (‘‘the Commission’’) will take place.

**DATES :**  Date of Closed Meeting, including Hearing and Commission Discussion: Monday, July 22, 2013.

**ADDRESSES :**  2521 South Clark Street, Suite 525, Crystal City, VA 22202, from 8:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Mrs. Marcia Moore, Designated Federal Officer, National Commission on the Structure of the Air Force, 1950 Defense Pentagon Room 3A874, Washington, DC 20301–1950. Email: dfoafstrucomm@osd.mil. Desk (703) 545–9113. Facsimile (703) 692–5625.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**