alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 50 (Friday, March 14, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 12185]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6518]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[OPP-50826; FRL-5592-3]


Issuance of an Experimental Use Permit

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA has granted an experimental use permit to the following 
applicant. The permit is in accordance with, and subject to, the 
provisions of 40 CFR part l72, which defines EPA procedures with 
respect to the use of pesticides for experimental use purposes.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: By mail: Mike Mendelsohn, Office of 
Pesticide Programs, Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division 
(7501W), Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., Washington, 
DC 20460. In person or by telephone: Rm. 3142, CM #2, 1921 Jefferson 
Davis Highway, Arlington, VA, Telephone: 703-308-8715, e-mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#422f272c26272e312d2a2c6c2f2b2927022732232f232b2e6c2732236c252d34"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1d7078737978716e72757333707476785d786d7c707c747133786d7c337a726b">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has issued the following experimental 
use permit: 70218-EUP-1. Issuance. This experimental use permit allows 
the use of 0.825 pounds of the Bacillus thuringiensis subspecies 
tolworthi Cry9C protein in seeds shipped on 3,305 acres of corn to 
evaluate the control of the European corn borer and other lepidopteran 
corn pests. The program is authorized in the States of Alabama, 
California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, 
Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, 
Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, New York, North Carolina, 
Ohio, Pennsylvania, Puerto Rico, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, 
Virginia, and Wisconsin. The experimental use permit is effective from 
February 5, 1997 to November 30, 1997. This permit is issued with the 
limitation that all treated crops are destroyed or used for research 
purposes only.
    Persons wishing to review this experimental use permit are referred 
to the designated contact person. Inquires concerning this permit 
should be directed to the person cited above. It is suggested that 
interested persons call before visiting the EPA office, so that the 
appropriate file may be made available for inspection purposes from 8 
a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays.

    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136.

List of Subjects

    Environmental protection, Experimental use permits.

    Dated: March 5, 1997.
Janet L. Andersen,
Director, Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division, Office of 
Pesticide Programs.

[FR Doc. 97-6518 Filed 3-13-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-F


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 51 (Monday, March 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 12597]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6568]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Wyoming Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting of 
the Wyoming Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 10:00 
a.m. and adjourn at 1:00 p.m. on Saturday, May 3, 1997, at the Holiday 
Inn, 204 West Fox Farm Road, Cheyenne, Wyoming 82007. The purpose of 
the meeting is to brief the Committee on Commission and regional 
programs. The Committee will review implementation of recommendations 
contained in its report, The Employment of Minorities and Women in 
Wyoming State Government.
    Persons desiring additional information, or planning a presentation 
to the Committee, should contact Committee Chairperson Oralia G. 
Mercado, 307-472-2105, or John F. Dulles, Director of the Rocky 
Mountain Regional Office, 303-866-1400 (TDD 303-866-1049). Hearing-
impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require the services 
of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional Office at 
least five (5) working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission.

    Dated at Washington, DC, March 10, 1997.
Carol-Lee Hurley,
Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 97-6568 Filed 3-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-2631

ROBERT JAMES KENNY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, Defendant - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-99-296-3) Submitted: January 20, 2000 Decided: January 28, 2000 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert James Kenny, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Hannah Lauck, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Robert James Kenny appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to re-open a prior case. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Kenny’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Kenny v. United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit , No. CA-99-296-3 (E.D. Va. Dec. 6, 1999). We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
No. 11-11069.

#### McMillion *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
# C_2023329EN.01002302.xml

| 18.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 329/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 329/23

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 July 2023 — Nurel v EUIPO — FKuR Property (Terylene)

(Case T-325/22) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark Terylene - Earlier EU word mark TERRALENE - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Genuine use of the earlier mark - Proof of genuine use)

(2023/C 329/33)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Nurel, SA (Zaragoza, Spain) (represented by: C. Anadón Giménez and J. Learte Álvarez, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Frydendahl, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: FKuR Property GmbH (Willich, Germany) (represented by H. Timmann, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 30 March 2022 (Case R 1544/2021-4)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Nurel, SA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Nurel, SA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  
  OJ C 284, 25.7.2022.

---
# C_2022318EN.01003802.xml

| 22.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 318/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 318/38

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 4 July 2022 — Juvin v Parliament

(Case T-241/22 R)

(Interim relief - Law governing the Institutions - Member of Parliament - Exclusion from participation in election observation delegations of the Parliament - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Lack of urgency)

(2022/C 318/53)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Hervé Juvin (Paris, France) (represented by: F.-P. Vos, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: N. Görlitz and T. Lukácsi, acting as Agents)

Re:

By his application based on Articles 278 and 279 TFEU, the applicant seeks suspension of the operation of Decision D-301936 of the Co-Chairs of the Democracy Support and Election Coordination Group of 3 March 2022, which excluded him from all participation in the election observation delegations of the European Parliament until the end of his term of office as a Member of Parliament (2019-2024).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim relief is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim relief is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
# C_2022418EN.01004502.xml

| 31.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 418/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 418/45

---

Action brought on 1 September 2022 — Hästens Sängar v EUIPO — Mustang (Checked pattern in grey with black horses)

(Case T-538/22)

(2022/C 418/58)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Hästens Sängar AB (Köping, Sweden) (represented by: M. Johansson, R. Wessman and S. Ljungblad, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Mustang — Bekleidungswerke GmbH & Co. KG (Schwäbisch Hall, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union pattern mark representing a checked pattern in grey with black horses — European Union trade mark No 18 180 228

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 June 2022 in Case R 1730/2021-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision in so far as it annuls the decision of the Cancellation Division based on the conclusion in paragraph 39 of the contested decision that ‘[o]verall the signs [of the proprietor and the cancellation applicant] are similar’; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision in so far as it annuls the decision of the Cancellation Division based on the conclusion in paragraph 39 of the contested decision that ‘[o]verall the signs [of the proprietor and the cancellation applicant] are similar’;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs incurred by the proprietor. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs incurred by the proprietor.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council and the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council and the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union.

---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 54 (Thursday, March 20, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 13385]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-7040]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY
[FEMA-1164-DR]


Ohio; Amendment to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of Ohio, (FEMA-1164-DR), dated March 4, 1997, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 12, 1997

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3260.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster for the State 
of Ohio, is hereby amended to include the following areas among those 
areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe 
declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of March 
4, 1997: Highland County for Individual Assistance, Public Assistance 
and Hazard Mitigation.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 83.516, Disaster 
Assistance.)
Dennis H. Kwiatkowski,
Deputy Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 97-7040 Filed 3-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
# C_2023223EN.01000501.xml

| 26.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 223/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 223/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 11 May 2023 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Stuttgart — Germany) — TAP Portugal v flightright GmbH (C-156/22), Myflyright GmbH (C-157/22 and C-158/22)

(Joined Cases C-156/22 to C-158/22, (1) TAP Portugal (Death of the co-pilot) and Others)

(References for a preliminary ruling - Air transport - Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 - Compensation to air passengers in the event of cancellation of flights - Article 5(3) - Exemption from the obligation to pay compensation - Concept of ‘extraordinary circumstances’ - Unexpected absence, due to illness or death, of a crew member whose presence is essential to the operation of the flight)

(2023/C 223/06)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landgericht Stuttgart

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: TAP Portugal

Defendants: flightright GmbH (C-156/22), Myflyright GmbH (C-157/22 and C-158/22)

Operative part of the judgment

Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91,

must be interpreted as meaning that the unexpected absence — due to illness or death of a crew member whose presence is essential to the operation of a flight — which occurred shortly before the scheduled departure of that flight, does not fall within the concept of ‘extraordinary circumstances’ within the meaning of that provision.

---

(1)  OJ C 222, 7.6.2022.

---
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of DataJungle Software Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:  The Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the Form 10-KSB) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-KSB.  Dated: April 16, 2007/s/Larry Bruce
Larry Bruce
Chief Financial Officer, Secretary & Treasurer  The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-KSB pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-B and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-KSB for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.    1
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Provident Bankshares Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30,
2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Gary N. Geisel, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as added by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Gary N. GeiselGary N. Geisel Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of
the Board




December 22, 2005
|
|

|Energy Market and Economic Impacts of H.R. 2454, the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009                                                          
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Figure 12. Generation by Fuel in ACESA Main Cases, 2020 (billion kilowatthours).  Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800).
|Figure 12. Generation by Fuel in ACESA Main Cases, 2020 (billion kilowatthours).  Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800).
|Figure 12. Generation by Fuel in ACESA Main Cases, 2020 (billion kilowatthours).  Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800).
#### COM. v. RUTLEDGE, D.

2038 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/29/2017

CP-51-CR-0013043-2008

(Philadelphia)

Affirmed
# (



# c

( 

# Q'j Lhoist NorthAm**!!oft£~**

Colleen McKaughan Associate Director, Air Division United States Environmental Protection Agency Region IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105 RE: Five-Factor BARTAnalysis ofthe Nelson Lime Plant. Dear Ms. McKaughan: August 12, 2013 

# RECEIVED

·. AUG 1 3 

## 2013 Pemn••**~.** 

### ,,.,;e Air-3 

### U.S. EPA, Region 9

In May 2013, Lhoist North America (LNA) provided EPA feedback regarding the 2012 Five-Factor Best Available Retrofit Control Technology (BART) Analysis of the Nelson Lime Plant conducted by EPA's contractor (University of North Carolina and ICF International (UNC/ICF)). As we stated in our comments, LNA believes that the UNC/ICF report has insufficient detail about the basis for the control costs presented (both the capital and the operating costs) to be relied upon in a final BART determination. Additionally, LNA believes the report also has insufficient detail to support the level of emission reductions specified for the various controls. Consequently, LNA conducted their own Five-Factor BART Analysis of the Nelson Lime Plant to address the deficiencies of the UNC/ICF report. Attached, please find the LNA Five-Factor BART Analysis of the Nelson Lime Plant. Also enclosed is a hard drive containing the CALPUFF modeling files that support the analysis

. The analysis is based upon continuous emissions monitoring system (CEMS) testing of the Nelson kilns this past March, May and June and on dry sorbent injection testing of the Nelson kilns in June to evaluate potential sulfur dioxide control efficiencies of this technology. Our results indicate that selective noncatalytic reduction for nitrogen oxides control, use of a lower sulfur fuel blend for sulfur dioxide control, and the existing baghouses for particulate control represent BART for the operations and equipment at the Nelson Plant. LNA appreciates the opportunity to provide our BART analysis. If you have any specific concerns or questions regarding the report, I can be reached at (928) 769-2271 ext 645104 or by email at Herbert.Verville @LhoistNA.com

. Sincerely,

Herbert J. Verville Environmental Manager Lhoist North America, Nelson Plant
cc: Edward Barry, LNA Trevor Baggiore, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality LhoistNorth America - Nel son Plant P.O
. Box 370 Peach Spring s, Ari zona 86434 Phone: (928 ) 769-2271 Fax: (928 ) 769-2305
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2008-NM-167-AD

Executive Order 12866: Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"? YES () explain NO (X) DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: Isthe AD significant? YES () explain NO (X) Regulatory Flexibility Act: Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number ofsmall entities'! YES () explain NO (X) Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: This AD could affect intrastate aviation inAlaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated inAlaska. where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES () explain NO (X)
No. 12-5108.

#### Veteto *v.*Supreme Court of Alabama et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**Exhibit 10.42  — Base Salaries ofthe Named Executive Officers for Fiscal Year 2005**

                TheCompensation Committee of the Board of Directors has established the followingbase salaries for the named executive officers for fiscal year 2005:

 
| **Name and Principal Position**                                                  | ** ** | **Fiscal Year** | ** ** | **Salary** | ** ** |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|-----------------|------------|------------|------------|
| Burton M. Tansky 

President and Chief Executive Officer                         |       | 2005            |       | $          | 1,300,000  |   |
|                                                                             |       |            |       |       |       |
| Karen W. Katz

President and Chief Executive Officer

Neiman Marcus Stores       |       | 2005            |       | 715,000    |       |
|                                                                             |       |            |       |       |       |
| James E. Skinner

Senior Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer             |       | 2005            |       | 510,000    |       |
|                                                                             |       |            |       |       |       |
| Brendan L. Hoffman 

President and Chief Executive Officer

Neiman Marcus Direct |       | 2005            |       | 440,000    |       |
|                                                                             |       |            |       |       |       |
| James J. Gold 

President and Chief Executive Officer

Bergdorf Goodman          |       | 2005            |       | 400,000    |       |
|                                                                                  |            |                 |            |            |            |  |

 

 

 

----