alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 12-189.

#### Lee *v.*Michael, Warden.

C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 10.45

          I, CAROL L. DILLON, an Assistant Secretary of REYNOLDS
METALS COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, do hereby certify that
the following is a true and complete copy of a resolution which
approves an amendment to the corporation's Restricted Stock Plan
for Outside Directors, duly adopted by the Committee on Directors
of the Board of Directors of said corporation at its meeting on
November 20, 1998, and that said resolutions are now in full
force and effect:

          RESOLVED, that the Reynolds Metals Company
     Restricted Stock Plan for Outside Directors is hereby
     amended effective January 1, 1999 by deleting Section
     3.03 thereof.
     

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have subscribed my name and
affixed the corporate seal of said corporation to this
certificate this 20th day of November, 1998.



                                   /s/ Carol L. Dillon
                                   _________________________
                                   Carol L. Dillon
                                   Assistant Secretary

SEAL
##### 



EXHIBIT 15.1 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The Trustee
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust: We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement Nos. 333-103952
(Form S-3) and 333-114394 (Form S-3) of Archstone-Smith Operating Trust of our reports dated
February 28, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Archstone-Smith Operating
Trust and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of
earnings, unitholders equity, other common unitholders interest and comprehensive earnings
(loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004, and
all related financial statement schedules, managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 and the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, which reports appear in the December 31, 2004
annual report on Form 10-K of Archstone-Smith Operating Trust. /s/ KPMG LLP Denver, Colorado
February 28, 2005
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 21


                                  SUBSIDIARIES


1.   GENERAL

     Western Beef, Inc. conducts its retail and wholesale food business directly
and through 14 consolidated wholly-owned subsidiaries and six consolidated
subsidiaries wholly-owned by Quarex Operating Company, Inc., a 100% subsidiary
of the registrant.

2.   OTHER SUBSIDIARIES

Awesome Transportation, Inc.

East Central Meats, Inc.

Quarex New England, Inc.

Western Beef Advertising, Inc.

Western Beef, Administration, Inc. (Formerly known as Western Beef, Inc. (New
York Corporation)

W.B. Packing,, Inc.

Western Beef-West End Ave. Inc. (Formerly known as Western Beef-Atlantic
Ave.Inc.)

Sabrina Food Sales, Inc.

Food Warehouse, Inc.


NOTE:

     All corporations listed above were incorporated in New York except for
Quarex-New England, Inc. which was incorporated in Massachusetts.


<PAGE>


                       SUBSIDIARIES OF WESTERN BEEF, INC.


WESTERN BEEF     -METROPOLITAN AVENUE, INC.

                 -MORRIS AVENUE, INC.

                 -FOREST AVENUE, INC.

                 -14TH STREET, INC.

W.B. PRODUCE     -METROPOLITAN AVENUE, INC.

WESTERN BEEF     -MERRICK BLVD., INC.

                 -FORT GREENE PLACE, INC.

                 -CANARSIE, INC.

W.B. PRODUCE     -CANARSIE, INC.

WESTERN BEEF     -173RD STREET, INC.

                 -ROSEDALE AVENUE, INC.

                 -STEINWAY STREET, INC.

                 -EMPIRE BLVD., INC.

                 -MINEOLA, INC.

                 SUBSIDIARIES OF QUAREX OPERATING COMPANY, INC.

WESTERN BEEF     -COLLEGE POINT BLVD. , INC.(FORMERLY KNOWN AS RANBAR PACKING,
                  INC.)

WESTERN BEEF     -EAST ORANGE, N. J., INC.

                 -EAST NEW YORK, INC.

                 -PARK AVENUE, INC.

                 -ELMONT, INC. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS QUAREX-ELMONT, INC.)

WESTERN BEEF SUPERMARKET, INC.

NOTE:

     All corporations listed above were incorporated in New York except for
Western Beef-East Orange, N.J., Inc., which was incorporated in New Jersey.
# hr2454cap.0729a

Total Energy Supply and Disposition Summary

Energy Consumption by Sector and Source

Energy Prices by Sector and Source

Residential Sector Key Indicators and Consumption

Commercial Sector Key Indicators and Consumption

Industrial Sector Key Indicators and Consumption

Transportation Sector Key Indicators and Delivered Energy Consumption

Electricity Supply, Disposition, Prices, and Emissions

Electricity Generating Capacity

Electricity Trade

Liquid Fuels Supply and Disposition

Petroleum Product Prices

Natural Gas Supply, Disposition, and Prices

Oil and Gas Supply

Coal Supply, Disposition, and Prices

Renewable Energy Generating Capacity and Generation

Carbon Dioxide Emissions by Sector and Source

Macroeconomic Indicators

Energy-Related Carbon Dioxide Emissions by End Use

Renewable Energy Consumption by Sector and Source 1/

Greenhouse Gas Compliance Results
# C_2022380EN.01002601.xml

| 3.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 380/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 380/26

---

Action brought on 24 August 2022 — Vitromed v EUIPO — Vitromed Healthcare (VITROMED Germany)

(Case T-514/22)

(2022/C 380/32)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Vitromed GmbH (Jena, Germany) (represented by: M. Linß, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Vitromed Healthcare (Jaipur, India)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: Application for EU figurative mark VITROMED Germany — Application No 18 209 244

Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 June 2022 in Case R 1670/2021-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | reject the opposition in its entirety; |
| --- | --- |

—

reject the opposition in its entirety;

| — | order the opponent to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the opponent to pay the costs.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
<PAGE>
 
                                                                     EXHIBIT 23
 
                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
 
The Board of Trustees and Shareholders of Security Capital Pacific Trust:
 
We consent to incorporation by reference in registration statements No. 33-
25317 (Form S-8), No. 333-4455 (Form S-4), and No. 333-12885 (Form S-3) of
Security Capital Pacific Trust of our report dated January 29, 1997, except as
to Note 13 which is as of March 10, 1997, relating to the balance sheets of
Security Capital Pacific Trust as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the
related statements of earnings, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each
of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1996, and the related
schedule, which report appears in the December 31, 1996 annual report on Form
10-K of Security Capital Pacific Trust.
 
                                          KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
 
Chicago, Illinois
March 13, 1997
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 908 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 908

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow individuals only 
 enrolled in Medicare Part A to contribute to health savings accounts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 30, 2019

Mr. Latta (for himself, Mr. Gibbs, Mr. Meadows, Mr. Gianforte, and Mr. 
 Webster of Florida) introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow individuals only 
 enrolled in Medicare Part A to contribute to health savings accounts.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stop Penalizing Working Seniors 
Act''.

SEC. 2. INDIVIDUALS OVER AGE 65 ENROLLED ONLY IN MEDICARE PART A 
              ALLOWED TO CONTRIBUTE TO HEALTH SAVINGS ACCOUNTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 223(b)(7) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by adding at the end the following: ``This paragraph 
shall not apply to any individual during any period for which the 
individual's only entitlement to such benefits is an entitlement to 
hospital insurance benefits under part A of title XVIII of such Act 
pursuant to an enrollment for such hospital insurance benefits under 
section 226(a) of such Act.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this subsection shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2018.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2022109EN.01003002.xml

| 7.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 109/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 109/30

---

Action brought on 18 January 2022 — Innovaciones Cosmético Farmacéuticas v EUIPO — Benito Oliver (th pharma)

(Case T-27/22)

(2022/C 109/40)

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Innovaciones Cosmético Farmacéuticas SL (Alhama de Murcia, Spain) (represented by: J. Oria Sousa-Montes, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Miguel Ángel Benito Oliver (Pont D’Inca-Marratxi, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for EU figurative mark th pharma — Application for registration No 17 916 522

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 9 November 2021 in Case R 1605/2020-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) and Article 47(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 10, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134110 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 134110 

 COA: 276627 

Lenawee CC: 06-012463-FH 

SUSAN RAY BAYS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 20, 2007 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p0830 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 10, 2007 

 Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 56 (Monday, March 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 13872]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-7331]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Defense Science Board Task Force on Underground Facilities

ACTION: Notice of advisory committee meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board Task Force on Underground Facilities 
will meet in closed session on April 30-May 2, 1997 at Defense Special 
Weapons Agency, Nuclear Test Site, Las Vegas, Nevada.
    The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary 
of Defense through the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and 
Technology on scientific and technical matters as they affect the 
perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At this meeting the Task 
Force will address the threat to U.S. interests posed by the growth of 
underground facilities in unfriendly nations. The Task Force should 
investigate technologies and techniques to meet the international 
security and military strategy challenges posed by these facilities.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, P.L. No. 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II, (1994)), it has 
been determined that this DSB Task Force meeting concerns matters 
listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) (1994), and that accordingly this meeting 
will be closed to the public.

    Dated: March 19, 1997.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 97-7331 Filed 3-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20
- 0603 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. TRENT MATTHEW LARSON ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including February 28, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 18 2022

01/18/2022

Case Number: DA 20-0603
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 55 (Friday, March 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13723-13724]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-7130]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES


National Endowment for the Arts; Public Partnership Panel 
Teleconference

    Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Public Law 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that a meeting 
of the Public Partnership Advisory Panel (Underserved Section ) to the 
National Council on the Arts will meet on April 9, 1997. The panel will 
convene by teleconference from 1:00 p.m. to 4:30

[[Page 13724]]

p.m. The teleconference will be held in Room 726 at the Nancy Hanks 
Center, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20506.
    This meeting is for the purpose of application evaluation, under 
the National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities Act of 1965, as 
amended, including discussion of information given in confidence to the 
Agency by grant applicants.
    In accordance with the determination of the Chairman of June 22, 
1995, these sessions will be closed to the public pursuant to 
subsections (c) (4), (6) of section 552b of Title 5, United States 
Code.
    Further information with reference to this meeting can be obtained 
from Ms. Kathy Plowitz-Worden, Panel Coordinator, National Endowment 
for the Arts, Washington, D.C. 20506, or call (202) 682-5691.

    Dated: March 17, 1997.
Kathy Plowitz-Worden,
Panel Coordinator, National Endowment for the Arts.
[FR Doc. 97-7130 Filed 3-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-M
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 991 

To extend certain provisions of the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery 

Act until September 30, 2030, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 6, 2019 

Ms. SEWELL of Alabama (for herself, Mr. WENSTRUP, Ms. BASS, Mr. 

SCHWEIKERT, Mr. HASTINGS, and Mr. LEWIS) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend certain provisions of the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act until September 30, 2030, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Extension of the Carib5 bean Basin Economic Recovery Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF THE CARIBBEAN BASIN ECONOMIC 

7 RECOVERY ACT. 

8 Section 213 of the Caribbean Basin Economic Recov9 ery Act (19 U.S.C. 2703) is amended as follows: 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 991 IH

1 (1) EXTENSION FOR CERTAIN KNIT APPAREL

2 ARTICLES.—In clause (iii) of subsection (b)(2)(A)— 

3 (A) in subclause (II)(cc), by striking ‘‘Sep4 tember 30, 2020’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 

5 2030’’; and 

6 (B) in subclause (IV)(dd), by striking 

7 ‘‘September 30, 2020’’ and inserting ‘‘Sep8 tember 30, 2030’’. 

9 (2) EXTENSION OF LIMITATION WITH RESPECT

10 TO CERTAIN OTHER APPAREL ARTICLES.—In clause 

11 (iv)(II) of such subsection, by striking ‘‘18’’ and in12 serting ‘‘28’’. 

13 (3) EXTENSION OF TRANSITION PERIOD.—In 

14 subsection (b)(5)(D)(i), by striking ‘‘September 30, 

15 2020’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2030’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
03 14 2014 8-K Exhibit 10.1


Exhibit 10.1


LipoScience, Inc.
Senior Leadership Team Annual Incentive Compensation Plan Terms


		
	1.
	Plan Objective:  The LipoScience, Inc. Senior Leadership Team Annual Incentive Plan (referred to as the “Plan”) is designed to focus key employee behavior on achievement of Company objectives and strategy as well as align the interests of management to those of stockholders.


		
	2.
	Administration:  The Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Administrator”).  The Administrator may delegate its authority to administer the Plan to an individual or committee.  


		
	3.
	Performance Period:  The Performance Period begins on January 1 and ends of December 31 of each year (or such shorter periods as the Administrator may determine).


		
	4.
	Performance Goals:  The Administrator shall establish one or more performance goals for the specified Performance Period.  Performance goals may include objective and/or subjective measures of financial, strategic or individual performance as determined by the Administrator.  Performance goals need not be the same for Performance Periods or among participating employees for any given Performance Period. 


		
	5.
	Target Awards:  The Administrator shall establish the members of the Senior Leadership Team who shall participate in the Plan (each, a “Participant”) and for each Participant a target award that shall be payable if and to the extent the Company and individual attains the performance goals applicable to the Participant for the specified Performance Period.  The Administrator may establish a range of possible award amounts relative to target based on the degree of achievement of the applicable performance goals.


		
	6.
	Calculation of the Incentive Awards:  At the end of the Performance Period, the Administrator shall determine for each Participant whether and to what extent the performance goals have been met and the percentage of the target award that is earned.  


		
	7.
	New Hires:  Participants who start after January 1 of the applicable Performance Period are eligible for a pro-rated award based on their length of employment during the Performance Period, except as the Administrator may otherwise determine.


		
	8.
	Payment of IC Award:  Participants must be employed through December 31 of the applicable year and on the date the Plan payment is actually paid to be eligible for the payment.  Plan awards are paid as soon as administratively possible after the close of Performance Period, but no later than March 15 of the following year.
14910-J3-P] 

# -..-.,"•.. - /I T 

# r::e:L~ ~" Iv 'F 

## J.~ 

## \'2-0

# l

~" 

# , ~-:Zd-Io ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).



# , 7"",-]- SUMMARY: Wepropose to adopt anew airworthiness directive (AD) for the products ---. __ 

## C,(~ Airworthiness Directives; Dassault-Aviation Model FALCON 7X Airplanes (Docket No. FAA-2010-*H**; Direc:torate Identifier 2010-NM~140-ADI
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. R1N 2120-AA64 14eFR 

### Part 39 Federal Aviation Administration DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsafe condition as: 1r-/3 10

"'.. "-0 .••.•.
_ 

# 11,"1'\- ,C'

# 0 • • 

### ~~vW\. 

# /;0 • 

# • • • • • 

# • Following investigation ofan in service,event, 

### it has been determined that in case a short circuit occurs on aweight-an-wheels (WOW) proximity sensor wiring, both circuil breakers that supply power lo that wiring will trip, causing simultaneous de·power ofall WOW proximity sensors ofthat part ofthe system. The loss of the corresponding WOW information would lead to untimely inhibition ofwarnings that could compromise the pilol capacity to react to abnormal or failure landing conditions. information (MeAl) originated by an aviation aulhority of another COWltry to identify listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness

The proposed AD would.require actions that ~ intended to address the unsafe condili ~ ••
_ described in the MeAl. ","u 

## , DATF..s: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by [INSERT DATE 45
FAA Form 1360-14.1 (6-89) 0FflClAl AlE copy
B r i d g e r W i l d e r n e s s F i t z p at r i c k W i l d e r n e s s A f to n L an d e r D u b o i s Vi c to r

D r i g g s J a c k s o n

Ri v e rt o n S h o s h o n i

M a r b l eto n

G r e e n Ri v e r T h e r m o p o li s

Ro ck S p ri n g s I 8 0 B U S U 8 9 U 1 8 9 U 2 6

U 1 9 1 U 2 8 7 U 2 0

U 3 0 U 3 0 B U 8 9 U 8 9

I 8 0

0 8 0 1 6 0 4 0 k m F M C G r a n g e r 

### F i g u r e 1 - 3 L o c at i o n o f F M C G r a n g e r F a c i l i ty R e l a t i v e t o B r i d g e r a n d F i t z p at r i c k W i l d e r n e s s A r e a s
No. 12-5397.

#### Gomez-Hawkins *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.