alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U. S. ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION
OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
1225 New York Avenue, NW, Suite 1100
Washington, DC. 20005

July 22, 2010

Steve Pearson, Vice President, Certification

Election Systems & Software Sent via mail and e-mail
11208 John Galt Blvd.

Omaha, NE 68137

Re: _ Initial Decision on Certification
Dear Mr. Steve Pearson,

This correspondence is to inform you that Election Systems & Software’s Unity 3.2.0.0.
Rev.1 has completed the initial step towards receipt of an EAC certification. This Initial
Decision on Certification represents an EAC acknowledgement that the Unity 3.2.0.0 has
successfully completed conformance testing to the 2005 Voluntary Voting System
Guidelines (VVSG).

However, as provided in §5.9 of the EAC’s Voting System Testing and Certification
Program Manual (Certification Manual), for an Initial Decision to become final and to
issue a certification number and a Certificate of Conformance, a manufacturer must
provide documentation to the Program Director verifying that the trusted build has been
performed, software has been deposited in an approved repository, and system
identification tools are available to election officials. A manufacturer must submit a
letter, signed by both its management representative and an iBeta Quality Assurance
official, stating (under penalty of law) that it has:

1. Performed a trusted build consistent with the requirements of §5.6 of the EAC’s
Certification Manual;

2. Deposited software consistent with §5.7 of the EAC’s Certification Manual;

3. Created and made available system identification tools consistent with §5.8 of the
EAC’s Certification Manual (a copy and description of the system identification
tool developed must be provided with the letter); and

4. Upon a final decision to grant certification, the manufacturer accepts the
certification and all conditions placed on the certification.

Upon receipt of documentation demonstrating the successful completion of the
requirements above and recommendation of the Program Director, I will issue an Agency
Decision granting certification and provide Election Systems & Software’s Unity 3.2.0.0.
Rev. 1 with a certification number and Certification of Conformance.


If you have any questions or need further information, please do not hesitate to contact
Brian Hancock or Matthew Masterson at your earliest convenience. I thank you in
advance for your time and attention to this matter.

Sincgfely,

07/22/10
Thomas R. Wilkey \ Date
Executive Director

Decision Authority

Ce: Brian Hancock, U.S. Election Assistance Commission
Carolyn Coggins, iBeta Quality Assurance
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS

FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

ALTON JOSEPH JOLIVETTE, JR. §

§ CASE NOS. 01-15-00672-CR

VS. § 01-15-00673-CR

§ 01-15-00674-CR

THE STATE OF TEXAS §

MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF 

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THIS COURT:

Appellant Alton Joseph Jolivette, through counsel, moves the Court to extend 

time to file his brief, due November 30, 2015, for the following reasons:

1. Counsel, Assistant Public Defender, Melissa Martin has been working on many 

cases including, but not limited to Humphrey v. State , 14-15-00226-CR; Hill v State, 01-14-

00945-CR; Bonds v. State, 01-15-00688-CR; Davison v. State, 14-14-00511-CR; and Cameron 

v. State, 14-15-00447-CR, as well as the instant case and has been unable to complete the 

brief despite due diligence.

2. This is the first request for an extension in this case.

In view of the foregoing, Mr. Jolivette asks the Court to extend the time to file 

his brief for 30 days, or up to and including December 30, 2015. This request is made 

in the interest of justice and effective assistance of counsel and not for purposes of 

delay.

Respectfully submitted,

ALEXANDER BUNIN

Chief, Harris County Public Defender’s Office

/s/ Melissa Martin

_________________________________

MELISSA MARTIN

Assistant Public Defender

TX. Bar No. 24002532

1201 Franklin St., 13th Fl.

Houston, TX 77002

email: melissa.martin@pdo.hctx.net

713/274-6709 Fax 713/437-4319

ACCEPTED

01-15-00673-CR

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

12/1/2015 9:17:00 AM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 12/1/2015 9:17:00 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing motion was electronically served on the 

Harris County District Attorney’s office on December 1, 2015.

/s/ Melissa Martin

__________________________

Melissa Martin
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1055 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1055

Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives to make corrections 
                    in the engrossment of H.R. 6395.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 20, 2020

 Mr. McCaul submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
 the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on 
House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives to make corrections 
                    in the engrossment of H.R. 6395.

    Resolved, That in the engrossment of the bill H.R. 6395, the Clerk 
of the House of Representatives shall make the following correction: In 
section 5001 (relating to Department of State authorities and 
activities), strike ``Department of State Authorization Act of 2020'' 
and insert ``Eliot L. Engel Department of State Authorization Act of 
2020''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 24.01

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of the undersigned, being a director or officer of SCANA Corporation ("SCANA"), South Carolina Electric & Gas
Company ("SCE&G") and Public Service Company of North Carolina, Incorporated ("PSNC"), hereby constitutes and appoints William B. Timmerman and Kevin B. Marsh, and each of them, his or her true and
lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him or her and in his or her name, place and stead in any and all capacities, to sign
one or more Annual Reports for SCANA's, SCE&G's and PSNC's fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, on Form 10-K under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or such
other form as any such attorney-in-fact may deem necessary or desirable, any amendments thereto, each in such form as they or any one of them may approve, and to file the same
with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of
them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done so that such Annual Report shall comply with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and the applicable Rules and Regulations adopted or issued pursuant thereto, as fully and to all intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming
all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them or their substitute or resubstitute, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has hereunto set his or her hand this 17th day of February 2005.

|                                                   |  |                                           
|-------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------
|/s/B. L. AMICKB. L. Amick
Director                 |  | /s/J. A. BENNETTJ. A. Bennett
Director    
|/s/W. B. BOOKHART, JR.W. B. Bookhart, Jr.
Director |  | /s/W. C. BURKHARDTW. C. Burkhardt
Director
|/s/E. T. FREEMANE. T. Freeman
Director             |  | /s/D. M. HAGOODD. M. Hagood
Director      
|/s/W. H. HIPPW. H. Hipp
Director                   |  | /s/L. M. MILLERL. M. Miller
Director      
|/s/M. K. SLOANM. K. Sloan
Director                 |  | /s/H. C. STOWEH. C. Stowe
Director        
|/s/W. B. TIMMERMANW. B. Timmerman
Director         |  | /s/G. S. YORKG. S. York
Director          

---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             688
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,360
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      3,154
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,341
<PP&E>                                          73,228
<DEPRECIATION>                                  32,152
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  51,090
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,977
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           529
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,135
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    51,090
<SALES>                                         28,769
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                28,769
<CGS>                                           21,708
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,708
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,489
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  26
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,854
<INCOME-TAX>                                       925
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,929
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,929
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.74
        

</TABLE>
#### Commonwealth, *v.*Knox, Appellant.

June 26, 1953:

Argued May 25, 1953.

Before Steen, C. J,,Steaene, Jones, Bell, Chidsey and Musmanno, JJ.

Appeal, No. 208,

reargument refused July 16, 1953.

*Harry B.*Back, with him *Back & Levy,*for appellant.

*Malcolm W. Berkowitz,*Assistant District Attorney, with him *Samuel Dash,*Assistant District. Attorney, *Michael von Moschzisker,*First Assistant District Attorney and *Richardson Dilworth,*District Attorney, for appellee.

Opinion

Per Curiam,

After careful consideration of the record and merits of this case, the judgment of the Superior Court is af*344firmed on the opinion of Judge Reno, 172 Pa. Superior Ct. 510, 94 A. 2d 128.

Mr. Justice Musmanno dissents.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-10345 Summary Calendar

CHARLES A. WATSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; ROBERT LAMBERT, Warden, John Middleton Unit; JAMES DUKE; THOMAS J. MEDART, Warden, Price Daniel Unit; BRIAN HORN, Warden; WYATT ALLEN HOWELL, M.D., Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:97-CV-62

- - - - - - - - - - January 14, 1999 Before JOLLY, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Charles A. Watson, Texas prisoner # 738898, argues that the district court erred in granting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. Watson alleged that he was wrongfully deprived of his personal property, that he was wrongly disciplined for refusing to performNo. 98-10345 -2- work, and that the defendants acted with deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. We have reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties and affirm the dismissal of the property-loss claim and the denial-of-medical-care claim substantially for the reasons given by the district court. See Watson v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice , No. 1:97-CV-62 (N.D. Tex. Feb. 20, 1998). We have also considered Watson’s claim that was not addressed in the district court that he was wrongfully charged with the refusal to work in light of his medical condition. In light of the nature of the penalty imposed following the disciplinary hearing, Watson failed to demonstrate that the charge and punishment, even if improper, resulted in a constitutional violation. See Madison v. Parker , 104 F.3d 765, 768 (5th Cir. 1997).
AFFIRMED.
# C_2023223EN.01001701.xml

| 26.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 223/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 223/17

---

Order of the President of the Court of 24 February 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sozialgericht Nürnberg — Germany) — CK v Familienkasse Bayern Nord

(Case C-284/22, (1) Familienkasse Bayern Nord)

(2023/C 223/22)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 276, 18.7.2022.

---
EXHIBIT 99.1
  LETTER
    REPORT AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2009 ON CERTAIN PROPERTIES OWNED BY
    UNITED STATES LIME & MINERALS, INC.
  DeGolyer and
    MacNaughton
    5001 Spring Valley Road
    Suite 800 East
    Dallas, Texas 75244
    January 22, 2010
                    Definition
    of Reserves




---



##### 



Proved oil and gas reserves
              12-month first-day-of-the-month
  Developed oil and gas reserves  Developed oil and
    gas reserves are reserves of any category that can be expected
    to be recovered:




---



##### 



Undeveloped oil and gas reserves  Undeveloped oil
    and gas reserves are reserves of any category that are expected
    to be recovered from new wells on undrilled acreage, or from
    existing wells where a relatively major expenditure is required
    for recompletion.
        Methodology
    and Procedures




---



##### 



Gross


NetReserves


ReservesWet Gas


Liquids


Sales Gas(MMcf)


(Mbbl)


(MMcf)ProvedDeveloped Producing


35,850



1,202



8,801Developed Nonproducing


403



15



111Undeveloped


15,480



613



4,403Total Proved


51,733



1,830



13,315   Valuation
    of Reserves
    NGL
    and Natural Gas Prices
  12-month first-day-of-the-month 12-month 12-month first-day-of-the-month 12-month
  Operating
    Expenses and Capital Costs




---



##### 



ProvedDeveloped


Developed





TotalProducing


Nonproducing


Undeveloped


ProvedFuture Gross Revenue, M$


63,335



805



32,047



96,187Production Taxes, M$


3,529



53



1,241



4,823Ad Valorem Taxes, M$


1,464



19



770



2,253Operating Expenses, M$


13,114



215



5,368



18,697Investment, M$


0



21



2,073



2,094Abandonment Costs, M$


126



5



37



168Future Net Revenue*, M$


45,102



492



22,558



68,152Present Worth at 10 Percent*, M$


21,916



280



10,187



32,383     *
    
    Future income taxes have not been taken into account in the
    preparation of these estimates.    Paragraphs 932-235-50-4, 932-235-50-6, 932-235-50-7, 932-235-50-9, 932-235-50-30, 932-235-50-31(a), 932-235-50, Extractive Industries  Oil and Gas (Topic 932):
    Oil and Gas Reserve Estimation and Disclosures




---



##### 



CERTIFICATE
    of QUALIFICATION
  I, Paul J. Szatkowski, Petroleum Engineer with DeGolyer
    and MacNaughton, 5001 Spring Valley Road, Suite 800 East,
    Dallas, Texas 75244, U.S.A., hereby certify:
**Exhibit 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We have issued our report dated March 8, 2006, accompanying the consolidated financial statementsincluded in the Annual Report of United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. on Form 10-K for the yearended December 31, 2005. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in theRegistration Statements of United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No. 033-58311,effective April 18, 1995, File No. 333-101290, effective November 19, 2002, and File No. 333-90876,effective June 20, 2002)./s/ GRANT THORNTON LLPDallas, Texas
U.S. Energy Information Administration Quarterly Coal Report, October - December 2023

Table 28. U.S. coal receipts at manufacturing plants by North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code

(thousand short tons)

Year to date

NAICS code

October -

December

2023

July - September

2023

October -

December

2022 2023 2022

Percent

change

311 Food Manufacturing 1,567 1,388 1,663 6,187 6,511 -5.0

312 Beverage and Tobacco Product Mfg. 2 2 4 10 13 -20.2

313 Textile Mills 1 s 2 4 14 -72.6

322 Paper Manufacturing 199 191 358 1,060 1,431 -26.0

324 Petroleum and Coal Products 878 804 1,137 4,018 5,326 -24.6

325 Chemical Manufacturing 693 661 755 2,784 2,957 -5.8

327 Nonmetallic Mineral Products Mfg. 1,666 1,584 1,897 6,595 7,528 -12.4

331 Primary Metal Manufacturing 278 272 269 1,118 1,054 6.1

333 Machinery Manufacturing 7 5 5 46 78 -40.8

339 Miscellaneous Manufacturing 206 234 278 870 1,072 -18.9

U.S. Total 5,498 5,139 6,367 22,693 25,983 -12.7

* Includes coal gasification projects.

** Excludes coke plants.

- = No data reported.

s = Absolute percentage less than 0.05 or value is less than 0.5 of the table metric.

Note: Total may not equal sum of components because of independent rounding.

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), Form EIA-3, 'Quarterly Survey of Industrial, Commercial & Institutional Coal Users.'
# C_2022463EN.01004201.xml

| 5.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 463/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 463/42

---

Judgment of the General Court of 28 September 2022 — Labaš v EUIPO (FRESH)

(Case T-58/22) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for the EU figurative mark FRESH - Absolute grounds for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001)

(2022/C 463/59)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Miroslav Labaš (Košice, Slovakia) (represented by: M. Vasiľ, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Eberl and T. Klee, acting as Agents)

Re:

By his action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 24 November 2021 (Case R 610/2021-1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Miroslav Labaš to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Miroslav Labaš to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 138, 28.3.2022.

---
# C_2022284EN.01004401.xml

| 25.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 284/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 284/44

---

Action brought on 16 May 2022 — Biogen Netherlands v Commission

(Case T-268/22)

(2022/C 284/60)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Biogen Netherlands BV (Badhoevedorp, Netherlands) (represented by: C. Schoonderbeek, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the European Commission of 13 May 2022 (C(2022)3251(final)) amending the marketing authorisation granted by decision C(2014)601(final) for ‘Tecfidera — Dimethyl fumarate’, a medicinal product for human use; and |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the European Commission of 13 May 2022 (C(2022)3251(final)) amending the marketing authorisation granted by decision C(2014)601(final) for ‘Tecfidera — Dimethyl fumarate’, a medicinal product for human use; and

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging a failure to observe the system of Directive 2001/83/EC (1) in relation to the rules on regulatory data protection, including Article 6(1) of that Directive, and the obligations of generic applicants under Article 10(1) of that Directive. |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging a failure to observe the system of Directive 2001/83/EC (1) in relation to the rules on regulatory data protection, including Article 6(1) of that Directive, and the obligations of generic applicants under Article 10(1) of that Directive.

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging a failure to recognise the consequences of the opinion of the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use of 11 November 2021 for the question whether the marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Fumaderm was capable of commencing a global marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Tecfidera in accordance with Article 6(1), second subparagraph, of Directive 2001/83/EC. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging a failure to recognise the consequences of the opinion of the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use of 11 November 2021 for the question whether the marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Fumaderm was capable of commencing a global marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Tecfidera in accordance with Article 6(1), second subparagraph, of Directive 2001/83/EC.

---

(1)  Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use (OJ 2001, L 311, p. 67).

---