alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.0





                             NATIONAL REALTY, L.P.
                         A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
                        Computation of Earnings Per Unit





<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                For the Three Months                    For the Nine Months
                                                 Ended September 30,                     Ended September 30, 
                                          ----------------------------------      --------------------------------- 
                                               1996                1995                1996               1995 
                                          --------------      --------------      ---------------     ------------- 
                                                          (dollars in thousands, except per unit)
<S>                                       <C>                 <C>                 <C>                 <C>
Net (loss)..................              $         (673)     $       (1,039)     $        (1,519)    $      (3,620)
                               
 Less - General Partner's      
   1.99% Interest...........                         (13)                (21)                 (30)              (72)
                                          --------------      --------------      ---------------     ------------- 
                               
Net (loss) allocable to        
 Limited Partners...........              $         (660)     $       (1,018)     $        (1,489)    $      (3,548)
                                          ==============      ==============      ===============     ============= 
                               
                               
Earnings Per Unit              
                               
 Net (loss).................              $         (.10)     $         (.16)     $          (.24)    $        (.56)
                                          ==============      ==============      ===============     ============= 
                               
                               
Weighted average units of      
 limited partner interest      
 used in computing earnings    
 per unit...................                   6,333,352           6,418,065            6,389,245         6,418,140
                                          ==============      ==============      ===============     ============= 
</TABLE>





                                       22
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 43 (Wednesday, March 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 10029]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5364]



[[Page 10029]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Intelligence Agency, Scientific Advisory Board Closed 
Meeting

AGENCY: Defense Intelligence Agency, Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of Subsection (d) of Section 10 of 
Public Law 92-463, as amended by Section 5 of Public Law 94-409, notice 
is hereby given that a closed meeting of the DIA Scientific Advisory 
Board has been scheduled as follows:

DATES: March 18, 1997 (800am to 1600pm).

ADDRESSES: The Defense Intelligence Agency, Bolling AFB, Washington, 
D.C. 20340-5100.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Maj. Michael W. Lamb, USAF, Executive Secretary, DIA Scientific 
Advisory Board, Washington, D.C. 20340-1328 (202) 231-4930.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The entire meeting is devoted to the 
discussion of classified information as defined in Section 552b(c)(I), 
Title 5 of the U.S. Code and therefore will be closed to the public. 
The Board will receive briefings on and discuss several current 
critical intelligence issues and advise the Director, DIA, on related 
scientific and technical matters.

    Dated: February 28, 1997.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register, Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 97-5364 Filed 3-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 979 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to require inclusion of the 

taxpayer’s social security number to claim the refundable portion of 

the child tax credit. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 5, 2019 

Mr. POSEY (for himself, Mr. WEBER of Texas, Mr. DAVID P. ROE of Tennessee, and Mr. YOHO) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to require 

inclusion of the taxpayer’s social security number to 

claim the refundable portion of the child tax credit. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Refundable Child Tax 

5 Credit Eligibility Verification Reform Act of 2019’’. 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 979 IH

1 SEC. 2. SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER REQUIRED TO CLAIM 

2 THE REFUNDABLE PORTION OF THE CHILD 

3 TAX CREDIT. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 24(d) of the Internal Rev5 enue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the 

6 following new paragraph: 

7 ‘‘(6) IDENTIFICATION REQUIREMENT.— 

8 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) shall 

9 not apply to any taxpayer for any taxable year 

10 unless the taxpayer includes the taxpayer’s so11 cial security number on the return of tax for 

12 such taxable year. 

13 ‘‘(B) JOINT RETURNS.—In the case of a 

14 joint return, the requirement of subparagraph 

15 (A) shall be treated as met if the social security 

16 number of either spouse is included on such re17 turn. 

18 ‘‘(C) SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER.—For 

19 purposes of this paragraph, the term ‘social se20 curity number’ means a social security number 

21 issued to an individual by the Social Security 

22 Administration (other than a social security 

23 number issued pursuant to subclause (II) (or 

24 that portion of subclause (III) that relates to 

25 subclause (II)) of section 205(c)(2)(B)(i) of the 

26 Social Security Act).’’. 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 979 IH

1 (b) OMISSIONS TREATED AS MATHEMATICAL OR

2 CLERICAL ERROR.—Section 6213(g)(2)(I) of such Code 

3 is amended to read as follows: 

4 ‘‘(I) an omission of a correct social secu5 rity number required under section 24(d)(6) 

6 (relating to refundable portion of child tax cred7 it), or a correct TIN required under section 

8 24(e) (relating to child tax credit), to be in9 cluded on a return,’’. 

10 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

11 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

12 December 31, 2019. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
# Personnel Preparation to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities

- U.S. Department of Education Awards More Than $35 Million to Develop Personnel in Support of Children with Disabilities The U.S. Department of Education’s (Department) Office of  Special Education Programs (OSEP) has awarded more than $35 million in funding  for 138 new awards supporting personnel preparation, ongoing professional  learning, and leadership development to increase the number of well-prepared,  diverse and effective personnel serving children with disabilities.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF
INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-85640
and 333-111810) and Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-61851-99, 333-23393-99, 333-41113-99,
333-41157-99, 33-52127-99, 333-76424, 333-84426, 333-103761) of Puget Energy, Inc. and on
Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-111810-01) of Puget Sound Energy, Inc. of our reports dated March
5, 2004 relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedule, which appear in this combined Form 10-K.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Seattle, Washington
March 5, 2004
##### 



Exhibit 10.19
 EXECUTION COPY
 TISHMAN SPEYER ARCHSTONE SMITH
MULTIFAMILY PARTICIPANTS, L.L.C.
 Award Agreement
     Name of Recipient:
    
    R. Scott SellersDate of Grant:
    
    October 5, 2007Number of Units:
    
    4,800Vesting:
    
    Subject to the Participants continued employment with ARCHSTONE-SMITH COMMUNITIES
L.L.C., a limited liability company formed under the laws of the State of Delaware or
any of its affiliates (the Employer) through the applicable vesting date, one-seventh
(1/7th) of the Units shall vest on each of the first seven anniversaries of
the Date of Grant. In the event of a termination of your employment by the Employer
without Cause or by you for Good Reason (each as defined, and in accordance with
the procedures described, in the employment agremeent by and among you, the Employer
and Archstone-Smith Operating Trust, dated as of October 5, 2007 (the Employment
Agreement), the Units that would have vested in the one-year period following the
Date of Termination (as defined in the Employment Agreement) shall vest immediately
upon such termination. Except as described in the preceding sentence, you shall
forfeit any unvested Units upon a termination of your employment with the Employer.Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event of (i) the consummation
of a Change in Control (as defined in the Employment Agreement) or
(ii) a dissolution or liquidation of the Company in accordance with
Section 17 of the LLC Agreement, all of your Units that are
outstanding (i.e., have not been forfeited) and unvested as of the
consummation of the Change in Control, dissolution or liquidation as
applicable shall immediately vest in full.
 - 1 -




---



##### 



By: 
Name:
    
    /s/ Michael B. Benner

Michael B. BennerTitle:
    
    Authorized Signatory
  Date Accepted:
    

October 5,
2007
 By:
    
    /s/ R. Scott SellersName:
    
    R. Scott SellersSocial Security Number:
No. 12-129.

#### Beary Landscaping, Inc., et al. *v.*Costigan, Director, Illinois Department of Labor.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# C_2022237EN.01003801.xml

| 20.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 237/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 237/38

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Gabrovo (Bulgaria) lodged on 31 March 2022 — IL v Regionalna direktsia ‘Avtomobilna administratsia’ Pleven

(Case C-227/22)

(2022/C 237/48)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Administrativen sad Gabrovo

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant in cassation: IL

Respondent in cassation: Regionalna direktsia ‘Avtomobilna administratsia’ Pleven

Question referred

Do the provisions of Directive 2006/126 (1) give Member States the possibility to require drivers of vehicles of categories С, CE, C1, C1E, D, DE, D1, D1E to undergo medical examinations to determine their psychological and mental fitness at intervals shorter than the period of validity of the driving licence, and in this connection to require a separate document (in addition to the driving licence) certifying their fitness? Or does the holding of a valid driving licence for the abovementioned categories also certify the psychological and mental fitness of the driver, as that fitness was determined when the driving licence was first issued or renewed?

---

(1)  Directive 2006/126/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on driving licences (OJ 2006 L 403, p. 18).

---
### MEMORANDUM TO FILE TO: Docket No. EPA-R09-OAR- 2013-0009; Approval of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Navajo Nation; Regional Haze Require ments for Navajo Generating Station; Proposed Rule FROM: Anita Lee Date: August 22, 2013 Subject: Record of Consultation Meeting w ith the Gila River Indian Community during Public Comment Period 1. Participants at Meeting
 In Washington, DC: Pat Childers (EPA), Joann Chase (EPA), Governor Gregory Mendoza (Gila River Indian Community), Councilman Barney Enos, Councilman Norman Wellington, Don Pongrace (counsel for Gila River Indian Community)
 In North Carolina, from EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards: Mike Koerber, Phil Lorang, Laura McKelvey, Greg Greene
 In California, from EPA Region 9: Deborah Jordan, Ann Lyons, Anita Lee
 In Arizona from EPA Region 9: Colleen McKaughan 2. Date and Location of Meeting:
 August 22, 2013 via video conference 3. General Statement of the Topic of Discussion:
 The Gila River Indian Community shared their thoughts on the Technical Work Group Agreement (of which they were a signatory).
 The Community also provided some suggestio ns to EPA regarding future government-togovernment consultation on NGS. 4. Copy of Any Materials Presen ted or Received (attached):
 None
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1073 

Expressing the view that every individual is created equal and made in 

the image of God and the modern Democratic Party’s use of identity 

politics rejects all attempts to unite America and instead focuses on 

dividing individuals into groups in order to achieve power. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 30, 2020 

Mr. BUDD (for himself and Mrs. LESKO) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the view that every individual is created equal 

and made in the image of God and the modern Democratic Party’s use of identity politics rejects all attempts 

to unite America and instead focuses on dividing individuals into groups in order to achieve power. 

Whereas every individual is created equal and made in the 

image of God; 

Whereas the Republican Party believes that every individual 

American is endowed by our Creator with the unalienable 

rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; 

Whereas the Republican Party believes in judging people 

based on the content of their character and not the color 

of their skin, their ethnic group, or their gender; 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1073 IH 

Whereas a Democratic Senator attacked the then-Secretary 

of the Interior of the United States for not wanting to 

make hiring decisions based on race; 

Whereas House Democrats introduced a divisive COVID–19 

relief bill that would require companies who receive Federal aid to make decisions based on race and gender; 

Whereas a Democratic National Committee (DNC) chair candidate said it is her job to ‘‘shut other White people 

down’’ when they claim they are not prejudiced toward 

minorities; 

Whereas a DNC staffer announced that she prefers not to 

hire ‘‘cisgender straight white males’’; and 

Whereas based on the above examples and many others, radical members of the Democratic Party believe that individuals should be judged based on their group membership and not on their individual merits: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that the modern Democratic Party’s use of 

3 identity politics rejects all attempts to unite America and 

4 instead focuses on dividing individuals into groups in order 

5 to achieve power. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
# EDA Disclaimer

 EDA DISCLAIMER: This template is provided at the request of Applicants as an optional tool to clarify the required information for your application in accordance with the other required, standard OMB approved forms. It in no way prevents you from supplying this information in an alternate format.This is an optional template. Please see the next tab for more information on how to complete.

# Eligible and Service Area

Instructions: Applicants should identify their Service Area(s) in columns B-E and their corresponding Eligible Area(s) in columns F-H. DO NOT FILL OUT UNLESS GEOGRAPHY HAS CHANGED FROM PHASE 1

<-- Please make sure to fill out these cells 
https://disgeoportal.egs.anl.gov/Recompete/https://tinyurl.com/REMT-CTVhttps://disgeoportal.egs.anl.gov/portal/sharing/rest/content/items/bffb1298f9614b3c85bdce4fe863a898/data

# EXAMPLE

<-- Please make sure to fill out these cells 

Instructions: Applicants should identify their Service Area(s) in columns B-D and their corresponding Eligible Area(s) in columns E-F. DO NOT FILL OUT UNLESS GEOGRAPHY HAS CHANGED FROM PHASE 1
https://disgeoportal.egs.anl.gov/Recompete/https://tinyurl.com/REMT-CTVhttps://disgeoportal.egs.anl.gov/portal/sharing/rest/content/items/bffb1298f9614b3c85bdce4fe863a898/data

# All Eligible Areas >>

# Local Labor Markets

# Tribal Areas and Pacific Ocean 

# Local Communities

# Partially Eligible LCs

# Census Tracts 

# Sheet1
#### Steve Mitchem v. State.

154 So. 213.

Opinion Filed April 16, 1934.

*D. Stuart Gillis,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Cary D. Landis,*Attorney General, and *Roy Campbell,*Assistant, for the State.

Per Curiam.

— Upon writ of error to a conviction of breaking and entering with intent to commit a misdemeanor the sole question presented is' the alleged error of the trial court in denying defendant below a new trial on the ground of insufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict.

The evidence we find in the bill of exceptions was of such probative force, nature and tendency as to warrant a jury composed of reasonable men to believe the defendant guilty as charged. Defendant undertook to give the jury a credible explanation why much of the stolen property was' admittedly recently in his possession. The jury disbelieved his explanation and found him guilty. The explanation is not so clear and convincing as to its verity that this Court can say as a matter of law apparent from evidence as a whole that it was capriciously disregarded by the jury, whose province it was to believe it or not.

*538A verdict of guilty of larceny, or of the crime of breaking and entering to commit larceny, may be found by a jury upon the evidence furnished by the recent possession of the stolen goods alone, even though the State has not introduced any evidence to prove directly the falsity of defendant’s attempted explanation of his alleged innocent possession of the stolen property, and even though the offered explanation may appear to the appellate court to be reasonable and highly plausible.

It is only where a reasonable and credible explanation by defendant has been offered to show that his' possession of recently stolen property was innocent and it appears from the evidence as a whole to have been captiously disregarded by the jury, that a reversal of a judgment of guilt is warranted in this Court. Bargesser v. State, 95 Fla. 401, 116 Sou. Rep. 11; Kilcrease v. State, 96 Fla. 264, 117 Sou. Rep. 862; Davis v. State, 97 Fla. 987, 122 Sou. Rep. 579. We find no captious disregard of defendant’s attempted explanation evidenced by the probative effect of the whole testimony in the record here, so the judgment must be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 974 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 974

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 12, 2019

     Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, 
                       Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To amend the Federal Reserve Act to require the Vice Chairman for 
Supervision of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System to 
           provide a written report, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Reserve Supervision 
Testimony Clarification Act''.

SEC. 2. VICE CHAIRMAN FOR SUPERVISION REPORT REQUIREMENT.

    Paragraph (12) of section 10 of the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 
247b) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating such paragraph as paragraph (11); and
            (2) in such paragraph--
                    (A) by striking ``shall appear'' and inserting 
                ``shall provide written testimony and appear''; and
                    (B) by adding at the end the following: ``If, at 
                the time of any appearance described in this paragraph, 
                the position of Vice Chairman for Supervision is 
                vacant, the Chairman or their designee shall appear 
                instead and provide the required written testimony.''.

SEC. 3. DETERMINATION OF BUDGETARY EFFECTS.

    The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of complying 
with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall be determined by 
reference to the latest statement titled ``Budgetary Effects of PAYGO 
Legislation'' for this Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional 
Record by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, provided that 
such statement has been submitted prior to the vote on passage.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 11, 2019.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
No. 11-336.

#### Corboy et al. *v.*Louie, Attorney General of Hawaii, et al.

Sup. Ct. Haw. Motion of Center for Equal Opportunity for leave to file a brief as *amicus curiae*granted. Certiorari denied.