alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
10.9


 


FORFEITURE
AGREEMENT


 


This
Forfeiture Agreement (this “Agreement”) is entered into as of June 23, 2021, by and between CleanTech Sponsor I LLC (the “Transferor”)
and CleanTech Acquisition Corp. (the “Transferee”).


 


RECITALS


 


WHEREAS, the Transferor desires to transfer 1,916,667
shares (the “Shares”) of common stock of the Transferee back to the Transferee.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto, for good and
valuable consideration which each party acknowledges the receipt of, hereby agree as follows:


 


		1.	Transfer of the Shares.



 


The Transferor hereby transfers to the Transferee
the Shares, and the Transferee hereby cancels the Shares.


 


		2.	Representations and Warranties of the Transferor.



 


The Transferor represents and warrants that it
has full legal capacity and authority to enter into the Agreement and to transfer the Shares to the Transferee hereunder, and is not bound
by any agreement, instrument or governmental order prohibiting such transfer. The Transferor also represents that it is transferring such
interests free and clear of all liens and encumbrances other than those created by the terms of the Transferee’s organizational
documents or imposed by applicable federal and state securities laws.


 


		3.	Binding Effect.



 


This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure
to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective legal representatives, successors and assigns.


 


		4.	Entire Agreement.



 


This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement
of the parties hereto.


 


		5.	Governing Law.



 


This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of
the State of New York without regard to its conflict of laws principles.


 


		6.	Modification.



 


This Agreement may not be amended or supplemented
at any time unless by a writing executed by the parties hereto.


 


		7.	Headings.



 


The headings in this Agreement are solely for convenience
or reference and shall not affect its interpretation.


 


		8.	Counterparts; Facsimile.



 


This Agreement may be executed in any number of
counterparts, each of which when so executed shall be deemed to be an original and all of which taken together shall constitute one and
the same instrument. This Agreement or any counterpart may be executed via facsimile or other electronic transmission, and any such executed
facsimile or electronic copy shall be treated as an original.


 


[The balance of this page is intentionally left
page.]


 




     


    


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed
this Agreement as of the date first set forth above.


  


	 	Transferor:
	 	 
	 	CleanTech Sponsor I LLC
	 	 
	 	By:  	/s/
    Eli Spiro
	 	Name: 	Eli Spiro
	 	Title: 	Chief Executive Officer


  


	 	Transferee:
	 	 
	 	CleanTech Acquisition Corp.
	 	 
	 	By: 	/s/
    Eli Spiro
	 	Name: 	 Eli Spiro
	 	Title: 	Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                  
<ARTICLE> 5                             
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial
information extracted from the quarter ended June 30,
1998 Form 10-Q Consolidated Balance Sheets and
Consolidated Statements of Operations as of June 30,
1998, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000                      
                                        
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                        13,196
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     24
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              13,220
<PP&E>                                             0
<DEPRECIATION>                                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                13,220
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          6,274
<BONDS>                                            0
<COMMON>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<OTHER-SE>                                         0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  13,220
<SALES>                                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 167
<CGS>                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,092
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    0
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (925)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (925)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (8.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0
                                                    

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 46 (Monday, March 10, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 10684]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5551]



[[Page 10684]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 96-AGL-18]


Establishment of Class E2 Airspace; Sawyer Airport, Gwinn, MI

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action corrects the previous airport name from K.I. 
Sawyer AFB, Marquette, MI, to Sawyer Airport, Gwinn, MI, as stated in 
Docket 96-AGL-18. Also, the legal description has been changed to 
reflect the correct wording for a 24 hour service due to an AWOS being 
installed to provide continuous weather reporting. A minor correction 
is also being made in the geographic coordinates of the final rule that 
was published in the Federal Register on January 16, 1997 (62 FR 2265).

EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 UTC, March 27, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
John A. Clayborn, Air Traffic Division, Operations Branch, AGL-530, 
Federal Aviation Administration, 2300 East Devon Avenue, Des Plaines, 
Illinois 60018, telephone (847) 294-7568.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

    Federal Register Document 97-1115, Airspace Docket No. 96-AGL-18, 
published on January 16, 1997 (62 FR 2265), revised the airport name 
and the seconds of the longitude for Sawyer Airport, Gwinn, MI. This 
action corrects those errors.

Correction to Final Rule

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the airport 
name, geographic coordinates and the legal description for the Class E2 
airspace area at Gwinn, MI, as published in the Federal Register on 
January 16, 1997 (62 FR 2265), (Federal Register Document 97-1115; page 
2265, column 3), are corrected as follows:


Sec. 71.71  [Corrected]

* * * * *

AGL MI E2  Sawyer, MI [Revised]

    By removing ``(lat. 46 deg.21'13'' N, long. 87 deg.23'43'' W.)'' 
and substituting ``(lat. 46 deg.21'13'' N, long. 87 deg.23'45'' 
W.).''
    Within a 4.6 mile radius of Sawyer Airport.
* * * * *
    Issued in Des Plaines, IL, on February 26, 1997.
Maureen Woods,
Manager, Air Traffic Division.
[FR Doc. 97-5551 Filed 3-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
No. 11-10879.

#### Hartwell *v.*Neven, Warden, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 53 (Wednesday, March 19, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13156-13157]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6913]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE

Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board

AGENCY: General Accounting Office.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that the 
Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board will meet on Thursday, 
March 27, 1997, from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. in room 7C13 of the General 
Accounting Office building, 441 G Street, NW., Washington, DC.

    The purpose of the meeting is to discuss the following issues: (1) 
Social insurance, (2) software development costs, (3) expense/
expenditure, and (4) environmental liabilities.
    Any interested person may attend the meeting as an observer. Board 
discussions and reviews are open to the public.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Wendy Comes, Executive Director, 750 First St., NE., Room 1001, 
Washington, DC 20002, or call (202) 512-7350.

    Authority: Federal Advisory Committee Act. Pub. L. No. 92-463, 
Section 10(a)(2), 86 Stat. 770, 774 (1972) (current version at 5 
U.S.C. app. section 10(a)(2) (1988); 41 CFR 101-6.1015 (1990).

[[Page 13157]]

    Dated: March 14, 1997.
Wendy M. Comes,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 97-6913 Filed 3-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1610-01-M
```
----

----

**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1)   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,                and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                              | /s/                Jonathan Z. Cohen   |
|---------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
| Date:  December                14, 2007 | Jonathan                Z. Cohen       |
|                                              | Chief                Executive Officer |
|                                              |                                   |

----

----
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 53 (Wednesday, March 19, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 12990]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6872]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. TM97-10-29-000]

Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation; Notice of Proposed 
Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

March 13, 1997.
    Take notice that on March 11, 1997 Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line 
Corporation (Transco) tendered for filing certain revised tariff sheets 
to its FERC Gas Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1 which tariff sheets 
are enumerated in Appendix A attached to the filing, with an effective 
date of April 1, 1997.
    Transco states that the purpose of the instant filing is to track 
rate changes attributable to transportation service purchased from 
Texas Gas Transmission Corporation (Texas Gas) under its rate schedule 
FT, the costs of which are included in the rates and charges payable 
under Transco's Rate Schedule FT-NT. The tracking filing is being made 
pursuant to tracking provisions under Section 4 of Transco's Rate 
Schedule FT-NT.
    Transco states that included in Appendix B attached to the filing 
is an explantion of the rate changes and details regarding the 
computation of the revised Rate Schedules FT-NT rates.
    Transco states that copies of the filing are being mailed to each 
of its FT-NT customers and interested State Commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, Washington, D.C. 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as provided 
in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-6872 Filed 3-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9004 

To amend the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation 

Act of 1996 to repeal provisions relating to the denial of benefits under 

the supplemental nutrition assistance program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 17, 2020 

Mr. GARCI ́A of Illinois introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To amend the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity 

Reconciliation Act of 1996 to repeal provisions relating 

to the denial of benefits under the supplemental nutrition 

assistance program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Removing Barriers to 

5 SNAP Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 9004 IH

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF DENIAL OF BENEFITS. 

2 Section 115 of the Personal Responsibility and Work 

3 Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (21 U.S.C. 862a) 

4 is amended— 

5 (1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘for—’’ and 

6 all that follows and inserting ‘‘for assistance under 

7 any State program funded under part A of title IV 

8 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).’’; 

9 (2) in subsection (b)— 

10 (A) by striking ‘‘(1) PROGRAM OF TEM11 PORARY ASSISTANCE FOR NEEDY FAMILIES.—’’; 

12 and 

13 (B) by striking paragraph (2); and 

14 (3) in subsection (e), by striking ‘‘it—’’ and all 

15 that follows and inserting ‘‘the term in section 

16 419(5) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

17 619(5)) when referring to assistance provided under 

18 a State program funded under paragraph A of title 

19 IV of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 601 et 

20 seq.).’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
June 23, 2015 

Mr. Ryan Becker 

324 Saint Joseph Street 

Rapid City, SD 57701 

Dear Mr. Becker: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

part 21 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we cannot process 

your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Cannot Process Your Request 

We entered your exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-1454) on 

May 5, 2015, but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent 

does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the 

request any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Aircraft and 

 Airport Rules Division

Enclosure
STEAM ELECTRIC

CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: ________________________________________

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.

SE04360A181
# C_2022418EN.01005102.xml

| 31.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 418/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 418/51

---

Action brought on 9 September 2022 — Noah Clothing v EUIPO — Noah (NOAH)

(Case T-562/22)

(2022/C 418/66)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Noah Clothing LLC (New York, New York, United States) (represented by: W. Leppink, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Yannick Noah (Feucherolles, France)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark NOAH — European Union trade mark No 5 620 968

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 July 2022 in Case R 504/2021-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision in so far as it rejects the application for a declaration of revocation with regard to the goods ‘polo shirts’ and ‘sweaters’ in Class 25; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision in so far as it rejects the application for a declaration of revocation with regard to the goods ‘polo shirts’ and ‘sweaters’ in Class 25;

| — | annul the contested decision in so far as it dismisses the cross-appeal; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision in so far as it dismisses the cross-appeal;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 95(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council in conjunction with Article 19(1), 3rd sentence, and Article 10(7) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 and with Article 6 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 95(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council in conjunction with Article 19(1), 3rd sentence, and Article 10(7) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 and with Article 6 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms;

| — | Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) and of Article 18(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) and of Article 18(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council in relation to the cross-appeal filed by the applicant before the Board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council in relation to the cross-appeal filed by the applicant before the Board of Appeal.

---
# C_2022368EN.01002901.xml

| 26.9.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 368/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.9.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 368/29

---

Action brought on 8 August 2022 — Dr. Rudolf Liebe Nachfolger v EUIPO — Bit Beauty (ayuna LESS IS BEAUTY)

(Case T-490/22)

(2022/C 368/49)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Dr. Rudolf Liebe Nachfolger GmbH & Co. KG (Leinfelden-Echterdingen, Germany) (represented by: E. Stolz, U. Stelzenmüller, H. Meyerfeldt and J. Weiser, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Bit Beauty, SL (Barcelona, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the figurative mark ayuna LESS IS BEAUTY — International registration designating the European Union No 11 369 553

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 June 2022 in Case R 982/2021-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | uphold opposition B 003088668 in its entirety and reject the IR No. 11 369 553 designating the EU; |
| --- | --- |

—

uphold opposition B 003088668 in its entirety and reject the IR No. 11 369 553 designating the EU;

| — | order the defendant, and, as the case may be, the IR holder/possible intervener to pay the costs relating to the present proceedings and those incurred for the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant, and, as the case may be, the IR holder/possible intervener to pay the costs relating to the present proceedings and those incurred for the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---