alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
2022 EAVS Data Brief: Massachusetts EAVS Jurisdictions:

351 

 Voter Registration 

Active Reg. Voters as of Nov. 8, 20221 

4,173,942 

Reg. Forms Received2* 

2,837,185 

Total Confirmation Notices Sent3* 

632,191 

Voters Removed from Reg. Rolls4* 

704,938 

Source of Registration Applications5 

Motor Vehicle Dept. 83.5% 

Other 8.5% 

Online 5.5% 

Mail, Email, Fax 1.5% 

In Person 1.0% 

 Voting and Turnout 

Voters Participating By Mode6 

7 Turnout 

49.0% In-Person 

Election Day 

1,386,373 

55.2% 

Mail 

922,559 

36.7% 

In-Person 

Early 

197,288 

7.9% 

Other 

5,240 

0.2% 

Total Voting Locations8: 1,524 

Total Poll Workers9: 9,540 

Election Technology 

Percentage of Jurisdictions Using...10 

100.0% 

Ballot 

Marking 

Devices 

100.0% 

Hand 

Counting 

84.0% 

Scanners 

0.0% 

DREs w/o 

VVPAT 

0.0% 

DREs with 

VVPAT 

0.0% 

Electronic 

Poll 

Books 

 Mail Ballots 

• 1,114,849 mail ballots transmitted11 

• 83.8% of transmitted mail ballots returned by voters12 

• 98.8% of returned mail ballots counted13 

• 1.2% of returned mail ballots rejected14 

• Did not conduct all-mail election15 

• Allowed drop boxes16 

• Allowed ballot curing17 

 Election Audits18 

-- Access audit 

-- Ballot design audit 

-- Ballot reconciliation 

audit 

-- Compliance/ 

procedural audit 

-- Eligibility audit 

-- Legal audit 

✔ Logic and accuracy 

testing 

-- Post-election 

tabulation audit 

-- Other 

Notes 

EAVS data and reports may be downloaded at www.eac.gov 

/research-and-data/datasets-codebooks-and-surveys. 

Responses of “Does not apply,” “Data not available,” and “Valid 

skip” are shown as zeroes or dashes. Percentages may not sum 

to 100% because of missing data or rounding. 

* Close of registration for 2020 

general election to close of 

registration for 2022 general 

election. 

1 A1b of EAVS. 

2 A3a of EAVS. 

3 A8a of EAVS. 

4 A9a of EAVS. 

5 Mail, Email, Fax is A4a/A3a. 

In Person is A4b/A3a. Online is 

A4c/A3a. Motor Vehicle Dept. is 

A4d/A3a. Other is the sum of 

A4e–A4l/A3a. May not sum to 

100% because of missing data. 

6 In-Person Election Day is F1b. 

Mail is F1d+F1g. In-Person Early 

is F1f. Other is F1c+F1e+F1h. 

7 F1a of EAVS divided by citizen 

voting age population (CVAP). 

8 D2a of EAVS. 

9 D7a of EAVS. 

10 F3a–f, F5a–F9a of EAVS; 

number of jurisdictions that 

responded “Yes” divided by

number of jurisdictions in 

state/territory. 

11 C1a of EAVS. 

12 C1b/C1a of EAVS. 

13 C8a/C1b of EAVS. 

14 C9a/C1b of EAVS. 

15 Q17 and Q17a of Policy 

Survey. 

16 Q19 of Policy Survey. 

17 Q20 of Policy Survey. 

18 Q36 of Policy Survey. See 

survey questionnaire for full 

definitions of each type of 

audit.
No. 11-11033.

#### Hanson *v.*California.

Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 53 (Wednesday, March 19, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 12997]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6865]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Project No. 11475-000-NY/VT]


Central Vermont Public Service Corporation; Notice of 
Availability of Environmental Assessment

March 13, 1997.
    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission's) 
regulations, 18 CFR Part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47897), the Office 
of Hydropower Licensing has reviewed the Central Vermont Public Service 
Corporation's application for an original license to continue operating 
the existing, unlicensed Carver Falls Hydropower Project, located on 
the Poultny River in the town of Hampton, Washington County, New York, 
and the town of West Haven, Rutland County, Vermont. Subsequently, the 
Commission's staff prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA).
    In the EA, staff evaluates the potential environmental impacts that 
would result from the continued operation of the project. Staff 
concludes that licensing the project with appropriate enhancement 
measures would not constitute a major federal action significantly 
affecting the quality of the human environment.
    Copies of the EA are available for review in the Public Reference 
and Files Maintenance Branch, Room 2A, of the Commission's offices at 
888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426.
    For further information, please contact Jim Haimes, Environmental 
Coordinator, at (202) 219-2780.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-6865 Filed 3-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             1372151
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      2832494
<ALLOWANCES>                                        221229
<INVENTORY>                                         562118
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   5009153
<PP&E>                                             3263558
<DEPRECIATION>                                     1685256
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     8664564
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             10048674
<BONDS>                                              28035
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                           1000
<COMMON>                                             15289
<OTHER-SE>                                        (1521331)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       8664564
<SALES>                                            6578522
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   6578522
<CGS>                                              3626338
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      3626338
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   2497429
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   13670
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     470979
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 470979
<DISCONTINUED>                                        3339
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        474318
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.03
        


</TABLE>
#### IN RE: R.N.R.S., a Minor, Appeal of: E.P.S.

452 WDA 2017

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/29/2017

TPR No. CP-02-AP — 000134-2016 (Allegheny)

Affirmed
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****    - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский 

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

        - Student Loans
        - Grants
        - Laws
        - Data

            - taxonomy view
            - College Scorecard 

# College Scorecard 

# College Scorecard 

                      -  February 7, 2022  New Updates to College Scorecard Make Tool More Useful for Students and Families With Data About College Costs, Graduation Rates, and Post-College Earnings  
Today, the U.S. Department of Education released updates to the College Scorecard that make the tool more useful for students and families weighing college options.  The tool also includes new and updated information that may be beneficial to school counselors, college access providers, researchers, and other critical stakeholders.
  **Tags:**Student Financial AidCollege ScorecardPress Releases

## How Do I Find...?

                      - Student loans, forgiveness
                      - Higher Education Rulemaking
                      - College accreditation
                      - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
                      - FERPA
                      - FAFSA
                      - 1098, tax forms
                      - More...

## Information About...

                      - Elevating Teaching
                      - Early Learning
                      - Engage Every Student
                      - Unlocking Career Success
                      - Cybersecurity

----

*Our mission* is to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness by fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access.

          - Student Loans
          - Repaying Loans
          - Defaulted Loans
          - Loan Forgiveness
          - Loan Servicers
          - Grants & Programs
          - Apply for Pell Grants
          - Grants Forecast
          - Apply for a Grant

          - Laws & Guidance
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - Civil Rights
          - IDEA Website
          - Data & Research
          - Education Statistics
          - Postsecondary Education Data
          - ED Data Express
          - Nation's Report Card
          - What Works Clearinghouse
          - Open Data Platform
          - COVID Relief Data

          - About Us
          - Contact Us
          - ED Offices
          - Jobs
          - Press Releases
          - FAQs
          - Recursos en español
          - Budget, Performance
          - Privacy Program
          - Homeroom Blog

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information Quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE

.

IN THE 

## A RIZONA 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEALS

D IVISION O NE

STATE OF ARIZONA , Respondent ,

v.

RONALD LEE MANNING , Petitioner

. No. 1 CA

- CR 23

- 0161 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Mohave County

No. S8015CR 2000598 The Honorable Douglas Camacho , Judge Pro Tem
REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL

Mohave County Attorney ’ s Office , Kingman By Amanda Claerhout Counsel for Respondent Ronald Lee Manning , Florence Petitioner FILED 11-28-2023STATE v. MANNING Decision of the Court

2 MEMORANDUM DECISION Presiding Judge Jennifer B. Campbell , and Judges Kent E. Cattani and Anni Hill Foster delivered the decision of the Court.

PER CURIAM : ¶1 Petitioner Ronald Lee Manning seeks review of the superior court’s order denying his petition for post

- conviction relief

. This is petitioner’s fourth petition.
¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post

- conviction relief. State v. Gutierrez , 229 Ariz. 573, 57 7, ¶ 19 (2012). It is petitioner’s burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition for post

- conviction relief. See State v. Poblete , 227 Ariz. 537, 538, ¶ 1 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on revi ew).
¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior court’s order denying the petition for post

- conviction relief, the petition for review , State ’s response , and Petitioner’s reply . We find that petitioner has not established an abuse of discreti on. ¶4 We grant review but deny relie f.
# C_2022207EN.01000901.xml

| 23.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 207/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 207/9

---

Order of the President of the Court of 11 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hamburg — Germany) — Passengers friend GmbH v British Airways plc

(Case C-89/22) (1)

(Air transport - Compensation of air passengers in the event of long delay of flights - Connecting flight consisting of two legs - Significant delay to final destination on the second leg operated by a non-European airline - Compensation claim against the European airline that operated the first leg)

(2022/C 207/12)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Amtsgericht Hamburg

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Passengers friend GmbH

Defendant: British Airways plc

Operative part of the order

Case C-89/22 is removed from the Register of the Court.

---

(1)  Date lodged: 10 February 2022

---
### I N THE UNI TED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FI F TH CI RCUI T

No. 12-10547 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. DAVID ALAN MOORE, Defendant-Appellant

A ppeal from the United States District Court f or the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:11-CR-254-1
Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * T h e F e d e r a l P u blic Defender appointed to represent David Al a n M o o r e h a s moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and U n ited States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2 0 1 1 )

. Moore h as not f iled a response. W e have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevan t p ortions of the record reflected therein. We concur with

c o u n s e l ’ s a s s e s s m e n t that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave t o withdraw is GRANTED, U n i t e d S t a te s C o u r t o f A p p e al s

F i f t h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D April 16, 2013 Ly l e W . Cay ce Clerk

* Purs uant to 5 T H C I R
. R

. 47. 5, the court has d eterm ined that this op inion should not be p ublis hed and is not p reced ent excep t und er the lim ited circum s tances s et forth in 5 T H C I R
. R. 47. 5. 4. Case: 12-10547 Document: 00512210089 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/16/2013No. 12-10547

counsel is excused from further responsibilities he r e i n, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 T H C I R
. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 12-10547 Document: 00512210089 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/16/2013
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 52 (Tuesday, March 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 12791]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6734]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Farm Service Agency


List of Warehouses and Availability of List of Cancellations and/
or Terminations

AGENCY: Farm Service Agency, USDA

ACTION: Notice of publication

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Farm Service Agency has 
published a list of warehouses licensed under the United States 
Warehouse Act (7 U.S.C. 241 et seq.) as of December 31, 1996, as 
required by section 26 of that Act (7 U.S.C. 266). A list of 
cancellations or terminations that occurred during calendar year 1996 
is also available. Interested parties may obtain a copy of either list 
from the person listed below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mrs. Judy Fry, Farm Service Agency, 
Warehouse and Inventory Division, U.S. Department of Agriculture, STOP: 
0553, P.O. Box 2415, 5962-South Agriculture Building, Washington, D.C. 
20250-2415, telephone: 202-720-3822.

    Signed at Washington, D.C., on March 10, 1997.
Bruce R. Weber,
Administrator, Farm Service Agency.
[FR Doc. 97-6734 Filed 3-17-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-05-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000818257
<NAME> JOHN HANCOCK REALTY INCOME FUND-II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       3,483,293
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  227,895
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,711,188
<PP&E>                                      19,258,208
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,993,597
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              29,194,213
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          494,105
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  28,700,108
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                29,194,213
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               874,272
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  204,080
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               173,042
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                497,150
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            497,150
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   497,150
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.19
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT        10.10(**
**a)**

**EXECUTION**

**ASSIGNMENT,        ASSUMPTION AND AMENDMENT **
**AGREEMENT**

**ASSIGNMENT,        ASSUMPTION AND AMENDMENT**
**        AGREEMENT**

**WITNESSETH**

**WHEREAS**

**WHEREAS**

**WHEREAS**

**WHEREAS**

----

**WHEREAS**

**NOW,        THEREFORE**

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

**Appendix        A**

**[as        attached]**

----

**Exhibit        I**

**[as        attached]**

----

**Exhibit        II**

**[as        attached]**

----

**Exhibit        III**

**[as        attached]**

----
# C_2022424EN.01002702.xml

| 7.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 424/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 424/27

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Apelativen sad Veliko Tarnovo (Bulgaria) lodged on 4 August 2022 — UT v SO

(Case C-523/22)

(2022/C 424/36)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Apelativen sad Veliko Tarnovo

Parties to the main proceedings

Defendant: UT

Private prosecutor and civil claimant: SO

Questions referred

| 1. | Is the definition of a credit institution in Article 4(1)(1) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms and amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 to be interpreted as meaning that credit is to be granted exclusively from funds received from the public as deposits or other repayable funds, or may a credit institution also grant credit from funds from other sources? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is the definition of a credit institution in Article 4(1)(1) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms and amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 to be interpreted as meaning that credit is to be granted exclusively from funds received from the public as deposits or other repayable funds, or may a credit institution also grant credit from funds from other sources?

| 2. | How is the content of the ‘instrument ... in any form ... by which the right to carry out the business is granted’ within the meaning of Article 4(1)(42) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms and amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 to be interpreted, and does it include both the authorisation scheme and the registration scheme which grant approval for credit operations? |
| --- | --- |

2.

How is the content of the ‘instrument ... in any form ... by which the right to carry out the business is granted’ within the meaning of Article 4(1)(42) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms and amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 to be interpreted, and does it include both the authorisation scheme and the registration scheme which grant approval for credit operations?

---

(1)  OJ 2013 L 176, p. 1.

---
# C_2022303EN.01005001.xml

| 8.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 303/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 303/50

---

Action brought on 30 May 2022 — Korres v EUIPO — Naos (EST. KORRES 1996 HYDRA-BIOME)

(Case T-328/22)

(2022/C 303/65)

Language in which the application was lodged: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Korres AE — Fysika Proionta (Metamorphosi, Attica, Greece) (represented by: S. Tsimikalis, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Naos SAS (Aix-en-Provence, France)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for registration designating the European Union in respect of the figurative mark EST. KORRES 1996 HYDRA-BIOME — Application No 18 197 304

Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 March 2022 in Case R 1410/2021-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

| — | Incorrect interpretation and application of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Incorrect interpretation and application of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
September 30 , 201 6

U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Operations, M

- 30 West Building ground floor,

Room W12

- 140 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590

Subject: Request for extension of exemption (Docket Number FA A

- 2010

- 1227)

SimC om International Inc. , Center number Q8PX 0 38K, is requesting and extension of our Exemption No. 10209 A which allows relief from the requirements of 14 CFR Part 91.531(a)(2); 91.531(a)(1); 91.9(a) to the extent necessary to allow SimCom

International , Inc. to train, test, and certificate pilots to fly the Cessna Citation, CE500 series aircraft, Singl e

- Pilot.

We assert that the conditions and reasons regarding the public interest and safe t y mad e in our original application remain unchanged.

Further to our petition we advise that SimCom has officially changed its name and been issued a revised training certificate under the name SimCom International, Inc. dba SimCom Aviation Training Phoenix effective May 23, 201 6

.

Sincere l y
,

Gary W. Santos Training Center Manager

SimCo m International , Inc.

7860 E. McClain Dr. Suite 1 Scottsdale, AZ 85260 gsantos@simulator.com (480)905

- 3040

7860 East McClain, Suite 1, Scottsdale, Arizona 85260

(480) 905

- 3040 / (800)293

- 3035 ( 480) 951

- 2709 Fax