alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       261,200
<OTHER-SE>                                   (261,200)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
No. 11-11122.

#### Richey *v.*Washington.

Sup. Ct. Wash. Cer-tiorari denied.
21,553

32,472 371

54,396

BallotsCounted

536

669

49

1,254

BallotsRejected

WASHINGTON

Mail,Fax,Email

Election/Registrar's

Office

Internet

DM

V

Public

Assistance

Office

DisabilitiesAgency

Military

RecruitmentOffice

OtherState

Agency

RegistrationDrives

Registration:Other

153,687

214,895

439,341

48,474 29,728 46,415 50,559

130 9,836 4,166

RegistrationFormSource

TotalRegisteredVoters

4,872,385

SectionA-VoterRegistration

RegistrationFormsReceived

1,163,266

ConfirmationNotificationsSent

499,688

Polling

Place

UOCAVA Absentee Provisional

Ballot

EarlyVote

Center

Voteby

Mail

Turnout:

Other

3,287,705

12,576 59,813 0 3,358 0 0

SectionF-TurnoutbyMethod

CountedFull Counted

Part

Rejected Provisional:

Other

3,358

1,653

1,168

0

SectionE-ProvisionalBallots

UniformedService

Non-militaryOverseas

Other

SectionB-UOCAVA

60,473

35,230

5,238

100,941

BallotsTransmitted

TOTAL TOTAL

ProvisionalBallotTotal:6,179 TurnoutTotal:3,363,452

Select: WASHINGTON

TOTAL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                          

  

2016EAVSDataBrief 

U i
# C_2022359EN.01003001.xml

| 19.9.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 359/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.9.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 359/30

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio (Italy) lodged on 10 June 2022 — LR v Ministero dell’Istruzione, Ufficio scolastico regionale Lombardia, Ufficio scolastico regionale Friuli Venezia Giulia

(Case C-377/22)

(2022/C 359/34)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: LR

Defendants: Ministero dell’Istruzione, Ufficio scolastico regionale Lombardia, Ufficio scolastico regionale Friuli Venezia Giulia

Question referred

Without prejudice to the possibility of considering the years of service completed by the applicant in the United Kingdom under EU law, notwithstanding the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union, must Article 45(1) and (2) TFEU and Article 3(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 (1) be interpreted as precluding a rule such as that laid down in Article 1(6) of decreto legge n. 126/2019 (Decree-Law No 126/2019), converted, with amendments, by legge n. 159/2019 (Law No 159/2019), according to which, in order to take part in the extraordinary competition for the recruitment of permanent teaching staff at Italian secondary schools, only the years of service completed by candidates on fixed-term contracts at Italian State secondary schools are considered valid, and not the years of service at peer institutions in other European countries, given that the procedure in question is specifically intended to counter the phenomenon of precarious employment in Italy? If the Court of Justice does not hold the Italian legislation to be contrary, in abstract terms, to the European regulatory framework, can the measures envisaged by that legislation be regarded as proportionate, in concrete terms, in view of the abovementioned public-interest objective?

---

(1)  Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on freedom of movement for workers within the Union (OJ 2011 L 141, p. 1).

---
No. 12-78.

#### Bey *v.*Pennsylvania.

Super. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.
# C_2022318EN.01002301.xml

| 22.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 318/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 318/23

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Wien (Austria) lodged on 25 April 2022 — G.K., B.O.D. GmbH, S.L.

(Case C-281/22)

(2022/C 318/32)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberlandesgericht Wien

Parties to the main proceedings

Accused and appellant: G.K., B.O.D. GmbH, S.L.

Other party to the proceedings: Austrian European Delegated Prosector

Questions referred

| 1. | Must EU law, in particular the first subparagraph of Article 31(3) and Article 32 of Council Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 of 12 October 2017 concerning the implementation of enhanced cooperation with a view to the establishment of a European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO), (1) be interpreted as meaning that, in the case of cross-border investigations in the event that a court must approve a measure to be carried out in the Member State of the supporting European Delegated Prosecutor, all material aspects, such as criminal liability, suspicion of a criminal offence, necessity and proportionality, must be examined? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Must EU law, in particular the first subparagraph of Article 31(3) and Article 32 of Council Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 of 12 October 2017 concerning the implementation of enhanced cooperation with a view to the establishment of a European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO), (1) be interpreted as meaning that, in the case of cross-border investigations in the event that a court must approve a measure to be carried out in the Member State of the supporting European Delegated Prosecutor, all material aspects, such as criminal liability, suspicion of a criminal offence, necessity and proportionality, must be examined?

| 2. | Should the examination take into account whether the admissibility of the measure has already been examined by a court in the Member State of the European Delegated Prosecutor handling the case on the basis of the law of that Member State? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Should the examination take into account whether the admissibility of the measure has already been examined by a court in the Member State of the European Delegated Prosecutor handling the case on the basis of the law of that Member State?

| 3. | In the event that the first question is answered in the negative and/or the second question in the affirmative, to what extent must a judicial review take place in the Member State of the supporting European Delegated Prosecutor? |
| --- | --- |

3.

In the event that the first question is answered in the negative and/or the second question in the affirmative, to what extent must a judicial review take place in the Member State of the supporting European Delegated Prosecutor?

---

(1)  OJ 2017 L 283, p. 1.

---
ex_261830.htm


Exhibit 10.1


 


Bruce,


 


As discussed, all of us on the board are really appreciative of your offer to step into the interim CEO and President role when Mendo leaves the business at the end of July.  We agree that this appointment will be well received by internal and external stakeholders, and that you are best positioned to take on many of Mendo’s responsibilities until such time as the new CEO is appointed and has started.


 


If you agree, you will be named interim CEO and President, effective July 31, 2021.  We will work with you to agree on the interim CEO operating protocol for running the business, including what support you will need from members of the board and any other internal or external support which will be required to ensure the day to day operations continue to run smoothly.  During the time you are the interim CEO, you also will remain the CFO and continue with those responsibilities, understanding that some support therefore may be delegated temporarily to other members of your team.  We do not anticipate that this appointment will be for a long duration as we hope to be able to appoint a permanent CEO in the next three months, although that appointment could be sooner (or later) than this.  In the meantime, however, we want to provide you with all the support necessary to ensure your tenure as interim CEO is successful.


 


We also want to recognize and compensate you for the additional responsibilities you will be taking on during this interim period.  We propose to pay you a cash stipend, effective upon your start date as interim CEO, equal to $10,000 per month for the time you serve in the interim role.  This stipend will begin to accrue on July 31 at the rate of $10,000 per month, will continue until the date that the new CEO starts, and will be prorated for any partial month of service.  The accrued stipend will be paid to you no later than 10 business days following the start date of the new CEO.


 


If the Company is unable to fill the CEO position with a permanent replacement, who is starting their tenure as CEO, by October 31, 2021, you may request amendment to certain terms of this agreement. Any amendment to this agreement would require Board approval.


 


If you agree to our proposal, please indicate your acceptance of it below, and confirm to me at your earliest convenience (an email acceptance is fine.)


 


We want to thank you again for your willingness to serve the company as the interim CEO until the appointment of a permanent CEO, and we look forward to supporting you in these increased responsibilities. 


 


 


  /s/ Gian Fulgoni                                                               


Gian Fulgoni


Chairman of the Board


 


 


Accepted on July 3, 2021:


 


 


  /s/ Bruce Rosenbloom                                                       


Bruce Rosenbloom


Chief Financial Officer & Treasurer


 


 


 


 


 


Exhibit 10.1 page 1 of 1
Exhibit 10.5


 


SHELTER ACQUISITION CORPORATION I

6 Midland Street, #1726

Quogue, NY 11959


 


June 29, 2021


 


Shelter Sponsor LLC


6 Midland Street, #1726


Quogue, NY 11959


 


Ladies and Gentlemen:


 


This letter will confirm our
agreement that, commencing on the effective date (the “Effective Date”) of the registration statement (the “Registration
Statement”) for the initial public offering (the “IPO”) of the securities of Shelter Acquisition
Corporation I (the “Company”) and continuing until the earlier of (i) the consummation by the Company of an
initial business combination or (ii) the Company’s liquidation (in each case as described in the Registration Statement) (such earlier
date hereinafter referred to as the “Termination Date”), Shelter Sponsor LLC shall take steps directly or indirectly
to make available to the Company certain office space and secretarial and administrative services as may be required by the Company from
time to time. In exchange therefor, the Company shall pay to Shelter Sponsor LLC or one or more of its affiliates an aggregate sum of
$20,000 per month, respectively, on the Effective Date and continuing monthly thereafter until the Termination Date. Shelter Sponsor LLC
hereby agrees that it does not have any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to any monies that may be set aside in a trust
account (the “Trust Account”) that may be established upon the consummation of the IPO (the “Claim”)
and hereby waives any Claim it may have in the future as a result of, or arising out of, any negotiations, contracts or agreements with
the Company and will not seek recourse against the Trust Account for any reason whatsoever.


 




     


     


    

 


	 	Very truly yours, 

	 	 
	 	SHELTER ACQUISITION CORPORATION I
	 	 
	 	By: 	/s/ Christopher Keber
	 	Name:	 Christopher Keber
	 	Title: 	Chief Executive Officer



 


	AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY:	 
	 	 
	SHELTER SPONSOR LLC	 
	 	 
	By:	 /s/ Christopher Keber	 
	Name: 	Christopher Keber	 
	Title: 	Manager	 



 


Signature Page to Administrative Services Agreement
No. 11-10608.

#### Spencer *v.*Arizona.

Ct. App. Ariz. Certio-rari denied.
No. 11-10300.

#### Orellana Campos *v.*Holder, Attorney General.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         5,973
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,483
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         339,769
<DEPRECIATION>                                 89,467
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 312,228
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        237,725
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       8
<OTHER-SE>                                     14,442
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   312,228
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               17,446
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  10,721
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             6,527
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,709)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,833)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,876)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                2,255
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (621)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.78)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.78)



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM RETAIL EQUITY
PARTNERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS
ENDED MARCH 31, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS   
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                  MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                            138,782
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      58,171
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  271,887
<PP&E>                                          7,922,196
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,742,032)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  6,476,242
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              99,087
<BONDS>                                         6,859,633
<COMMON>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       (428,478)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    6,476,242
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  267,693
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     104,226
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   26,869
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                158,861
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (22,263)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (22,263)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (22,263)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           0
        


</TABLE>
No. 11-10816.

#### Sanders *v.*Louisiana.

Ct. App. La., 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1055 

Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives to make corrections 

in the engrossment of H.R. 6395. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 20, 2020 

Mr. MCCAUL submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on 

House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

RESOLUTION 

Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives to make 

corrections in the engrossment of H.R. 6395. 

1 Resolved, That in the engrossment of the bill H.R. 

2 6395, the Clerk of the House of Representatives shall 

3 make the following correction: In section 5001 (relating 

4 to Department of State authorities and activities), strike 

5 ‘‘Department of State Authorization Act of 2020’’ and in6 sert ‘‘Eliot L. Engel Department of State Authorization 

7 Act of 2020’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
# Research

- Statement from Secretary of Education on National Center for Education Statistics' Data Showing Student Recovery Throughout the 2021-2022 School Year U.S. Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona released the statement below following the release of the National Center for Education Statistics' (NCES) June 2022 data that highlights an improvement in student performance and three-quarters of public schools offering summer learning and enrichment programs to help students catch up.
Exhibit 32.2

      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


      Pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  1350, the undersigned  officer
of  Harold's Stores, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby  certifies
that  the  Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q  for  the
quarter  ended  July 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully  complies
with  the  requirements  of  Section  13(a)  or  15(d),   as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and  that
the information contained in the Report fairly presents,  in
all  material respects, the financial condition and  results
of operations of the Company.

Date:  September 13, 2004     /s/Jodi L. Taylor
                              Jodi L. Taylor
                              Chief Financial Officer
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 1446

WILLIAM LEE GRANT, II , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. GREGORY K. HARRIS, AUSA; JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Leonie M. Brinkema , District Judge. ( 1:19

- cv
- 00327

- LMB

- TCB )

Submitted : August 20, 2019 Decided: August 22, 2019

Before FLOYD and RUSHING , Circuit Judges , and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
William Lee Grant, II, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: William Lee Grant, II, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the a ppeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Grant
v. Harris , No. 1:19

- cv
- 00327

- LMB

- TCB (ED. Va. Apr. 2, 2019) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
OncoLogic JustificationReport



### CH--~~~~: C - C - Z 

# II 0 SUMMARY CODE NUMBER FRET090536 SUBSTANCE ID Primary component of 09-0536 The final level of carcinogenicity concern for this aldehyde when the anticipated route of exposure is dermal is LOW-MODERATE.

JUSTIFICATION: Aldehydes are reactive electrophilic chemicals whichmay react with macromolecules or cause crosslinking to initiate carcinogenesis. However, being soft electrophiles, aldehydes tend to react preferentiallywith cellularnucleophiles such as glutathione before attackingmacromolecules. Furthermore, aldehydes canbe readily oxidized to acids which are not electrophilic and canbe readily excreted. Therefore, the carcinogenic actionof aldehydes tends to require relativelyhighdoses and to confine close to the site of administration.Ingeneral, the carcinogenic activityof aldehydes decreases with increase inmolecular size. Introduction of hydrophilic group(s) is also inhibitory. alpha,beta-Unsaturation generally increases the carcinogenic potentialprovided that the beta-position is not stericallyhindered. Halogenation of the alpha-carbon also increases the carcinogenic potential. 

### An aldehyde has a baseline level of concernof LOW-MODERATE. The group towhich the aldehyde is attached (Rl), which is an alkyl group containing three carbons, is not expected to significantly affect the level of concern. Therefore, the level of concern remains LOW-MODERATE. It is uncertain whether the substituent(s) onRl denoted as 'Z' have any significant effect on the level of concern. Exposure by the dermal route is not expected to significantlyaffect the level of concern, therefore the level of concern remains LOW-MODERATE. The final level of concernwhen the anticipated route of exposure is dermal isLOW-MODERATE.



### 1