alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 48 (Wednesday, March 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11459-11460]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6219]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[CA-026-2822-00-D580]


Emergency Closure of Public Lands; California

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, United States Department of the 
Interior.

ACTION: Emergency closure of certain public lands to motorized vehicle 
use in Lassen County, California.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with title 43, Code of Federal Regulations, Sec. 
8341.2, notice is hereby given that all the below listed lands and 
roads therein, administered by the Bureau of Land Management, have been 
closed to all motorized vehicle use until further notice; except for 
emergency vehicles, fire suppression and rescue vehicles, BLM operation 
and maintenance vehicles, law enforcement vehicles and other motorized 
vehicles specifically approved by an authorized officer of the Bureau 
of Land Management. This closure is necessary to protect fire damaged 
lands from off-highway vehicle travel during restoration efforts. This 
closure affects all of the public lands and roads located within the 
following lands of Lassen County, California.

T.28N., R13E., M.D.M.
T.28N., R14E., M.D.M.
T.29N., R13E., M.D.M.
T.29N., R14E., M.D.M.

    A total of approximately 3,160 acres.

DATES: This emergency closure action goes into effect April 15, 1997, 
and will remain in effect until the Authorized Officer determines that 
adverse effects have been eliminated and measures have been taken to 
prevent recurrence.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Linda D. Hansen, Area Manager, Bureau 
of Land Management, Eagle Lake Resource Area, 2950 Riverside Drive 
Susanville, CA 96130.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The authority for this closure and rule

[[Page 11460]]

making is 43 CFR 8341.2. Any person who fails to comply with a closure 
order or rulemaking is subject to arrest and fines of up to $1,000 and/
or imprisonment not to exceed 12 months.
Linda D. Hansen,
Area Manager.
[FR Doc. 97-6219 Filed 3-11-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-40-P
# C_2021357EN.01003401.xml

| 6.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 357/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 357/34

---

Action brought on 23 July 2021 — Ryanair v Commission

(Case T-444/21)

(2021/C 357/51)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Ryanair DAC (Swords, Ireland) (represented by: E. Vahida, F.-C. Laprévote, V. Blanc, S. Rating and I.-G. Metaxas-Maranghidis, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:

| — | annul the defendant’s decision of 12 March 2021 on State Aid SA.60113 — Finnair — COVID-19 — hybrid loan 107.2.b; (1) and |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the defendant’s decision of 12 March 2021 on State Aid SA.60113 — Finnair — COVID-19 — hybrid loan 107.2.b; (1) and

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on four plea(s) in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging that the defendant misapplied Article 107(2)(b) TFEU and committed manifest errors of assessment in its review of the proportionality of the aid to the damage caused by the COVID-19 crisis. |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging that the defendant misapplied Article 107(2)(b) TFEU and committed manifest errors of assessment in its review of the proportionality of the aid to the damage caused by the COVID-19 crisis.

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging that the defendant violated specific provisions of the TFEU and the general principles of European law that have underpinned the liberalisation of air transport in the EU since the late 1980s (i.e., non-discrimination, the free provision of services — applied to air transport through Regulation 1008/2008 (2) — and free establishment). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging that the defendant violated specific provisions of the TFEU and the general principles of European law that have underpinned the liberalisation of air transport in the EU since the late 1980s (i.e., non-discrimination, the free provision of services — applied to air transport through Regulation 1008/2008 (2) — and free establishment).

| 3. | Third plea in law, alleging that the defendant failed to initiate a formal investigation procedure despite serious difficulties and violated the applicant’s procedural rights. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Third plea in law, alleging that the defendant failed to initiate a formal investigation procedure despite serious difficulties and violated the applicant’s procedural rights.

| 4. | Fourth plea in law, alleging that the defendant violated its duty to state reasons pursuant to Article 296(2) TFEU. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Fourth plea in law, alleging that the defendant violated its duty to state reasons pursuant to Article 296(2) TFEU.

---

(1)  OJ 2021, C 240, p. 14.

(2)  Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 September 2008 on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community (Recast) (Text with EEA relevance) (OJ 2008 L 293, p. 3–20).

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-27-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                JAN-6-1996
<CASH>                                           4,149
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   97,959
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,982
<INVENTORY>                                    165,923
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               291,785
<PP&E>                                         220,875
<DEPRECIATION>                                  97,946
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 558,823
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          244,842
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        64,826
<OTHER-SE>                                     120,213
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   558,823
<SALES>                                      2,251,312
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,251,312
<CGS>                                        2,029,874
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,029,874
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               172,418
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,887
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 41,414
<INCOME-TAX>                                    17,625
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             23,789
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  1,002
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    22,787
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .73
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .73
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 4.1


 


 


Orange County Bancorp, Inc.INCORPORATED
UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARECUSIP: 68417L 10 7 SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONSTHIS CERTIFIES thatis the owner ofFULLY
PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK, PAR VALUE $0.50 PER SHARE OF Orange County Bancorp, Inc.transferable only on the books
of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed. This Certificate
is not valid until countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar.IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Corporation has caused
this certificate to be signed by the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officer and its Corporate seal to be hereunto affixed.Dated:VICE
PRESIDENT AND CORPORATE SECRETARY PRESIDENT AND CEO






     


     


    

 


 


The following abbreviations,
when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to
applicable laws or regulations.TEN COM - as tenants in common UNIF GIFT MIN ACT - _________ Custodian __________ (Cust) (Minor) TEN ENT
- as tenants by the entireties Under Uniform Gifts to Minors Act JT TEN - as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants
in common (State)Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above listFor value received, hereby sell, assign and transfer
untoPLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS INCLUDING
POSTAL ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE)Shares of the Common Stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and
appoint Attorney to transfer the said shares on the books of the within named corporation with full power of substitution in the premises.Dated,XXNOTICE:
THE SIGNATURE(S) TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME(S) AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THIS CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR,
WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATSOEVER. Signature(s) GuaranteedBY: THE SIGNATURE(S) SHOULD BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE
GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS ASSOCIATIONS, AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE
MEDALLION PROGRAM) PURSUANT TO SEC RULE 17Ad-15.
#### UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff-Appellee v. Bernard GLEGHORN Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-4569

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: January 10, 2018

Filed: March 2, 2018

*525Allison Hart Behrens, Assistant U.S. Attorney, John Timothy Bird, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Eastern District of Missouri, Saint Louis, MO, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Charles Joseph Banks, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Saint Louis, MO, for Defendant-Appellant

Bernard Gleghorn, Pro Se

Before SMITH, Chief Judge, MELLOY and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Bernard Gleghorn pleaded guilty in the district court1 to being a felon in possession of a firearm. Gleghorn appeals his within-Guidelines sentence of 36 months’ imprisonment as substantively unreasonable. His plea agreement contained an appeal waiver. *See*Guilty Plea Agreement at 7, *United States v. Gleghorn,*No. 4:15-cr-00532-CDP (E.D Mo. Jul. 6, 2016),,ECF No. 38 (“[T]he Defendant hereby waives all rights to appeal all sentencing issues other than Criminal History.”).

We conclude that the appeal waiver is valid and should be enforced. Our review of the record shows that Gleghorn entered into the plea agreement and the appeal waiver knowingly and voluntarily. *See Nguyen v. United States,*114 F.3d 699, 703 (8th Cir. 1997). Furthermore, Gleg-hom’s argument that his sentence is substantively unreasonable falls within the scope of the waiver, and no miscarriage of justice will result from enforcing the waiver. *See United States v. Scott,*627 F.3d 702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010) (de novo review of validity and applicability of appeal waiver); *United States v. Andis,*333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (discussing enforcement of appeal waivers).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

1

. The Honorable Catherine D. Perry, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          31,207
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   64,317
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,928
<INVENTORY>                                      9,124
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               123,772
<PP&E>                                       1,426,975
<DEPRECIATION>                                 443,948
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,125,212
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           53,616
<BONDS>                                        641,362
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        43,384
<OTHER-SE>                                     240,664
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,125,212
<SALES>                                        513,779
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               513,779
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  370,326
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              47,481
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 55,927
<INCOME-TAX>                                    21,811
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             34,116
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    34,116
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .78
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .78
        

</TABLE>
No. 12-5227.

#### Morais *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
|
|

|Energy Market and Economic Impacts of H.R. 2454, the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009                                                                                                    
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Table ES-2. Macroeconomic Impacts of ACESA Cases Relative to the Reference Case (billion 2000 dollars, except where noted).  Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800.
|Table ES-2. Macroeconomic Impacts of ACESA Cases Relative to the Reference Case (billion 2000 dollars, except where noted).  Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800.
|Table ES-2. Macroeconomic Impacts of ACESA Cases Relative to the Reference Case (billion 2000 dollars, except where noted).  Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800.
|Table ES-2. Macroeconomic Impacts of ACESA Cases Relative to the Reference Case (billion 2000 dollars, except where noted).  Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF

THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Paul B. Bolno, M.D., certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of WAVE Life Sciences Ltd.
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 28, 2017

|                                                                   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                   
|/s/ Paul B. Bolno, M.D.                                            
|Paul B. Bolno, M.D.                                                
|President and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)
EXHIBIT 32

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                    
|---------------------------------------------
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                      
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of ILX Resorts Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the nine months ending March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I (We), Joseph P. Martori, Chief Executive Officer, and Margaret M. Eardley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company./s/ Joseph P. Martori_________

Joseph P. Martori
Chief Executive Officer
March 13, 2005



/s/ Margaret M. Eardley______Margaret M. Eardley
Chief Financial Officer
March 13, 2005
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Knickerbocker Capital Corp. for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, I certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:  (1)the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Knickerbocker Capital Corp. for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Knickerbocker Capital Corp..    By:/s/ Dempsey MorkName:Dempsey MorkTitle:Principal Executive Officer,
and DirectorDate:Nov. 19, 2009By:/s/ Dempsey MorkName:Dempsey MorkTitle:Principal Financial OfficerDate:Nov. 19, 2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> BD

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       8,169,146
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,535,027
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                  0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                                0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                                  0
<PP&E>                                       6,854,872
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              28,399,276
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<PAYABLES>                                  12,583,712
<REPOS-SOLD>                                         0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                                  0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                                   0
<LONG-TERM>                                  7,688,556
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,500,402
<COMMON>                                       271,167
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,355,439
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                28,399,276
<TRADING-REVENUE>                                    0
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                           365,265
<COMMISSIONS>                               84,582,969
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                        0
<FEE-REVENUE>                               15,780,151
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             274,389
<COMPENSATION>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 66,318
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                    (167,278)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (167,278)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.05)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET OF THE REGISTRANT AS OF JANUARY 31, 1999 AND 1998 AND THE STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS OF THE REGISTRANT FOR THE THREE YEARS ENDED JANUARY 31, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                                         420,935
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,874,648  
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                      65,509,187
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              67,804,770
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                     59,735,443
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,069,327
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                67,804,770
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,909,758
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            10,109,946
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (193,071)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (193,071)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (193,071)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.10)
<FN>
<F1>THE REGISTRANT UTILIZES AN UNCLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET THEREFORE THE CAPTIONS
"TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS" AND "TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITITE" ARE NOT APPLICABLE.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Order entered July 23 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 12 - 01270 - CV STEPHANIE ANN NOVICK , Appellant

V. ANDREW A. SHERVIN , Appellee On Appeal from the 330th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Cou rt Cause No. DF - 08 - 13715 - Y



### O RDER On our own motion, we ORDER the Dallas County District C lerk to prepare a supplemental clerk ’ s record in the above

- referenced case, trial court ca u se number DF

- 08

- 13715 (330th Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Tex as) . The supplemental record should contain Respondent Andrew A. Shervin’s Special Exceptions Subject to “Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject

- Matter Jurisdiction” filed in the trial court on or about March 20, 2012. The district clerk shall file the su pplemental clerk = s record within 21 days from the date of this Order. We DIRECT the clerk of this Court to transmit this order electronically to Gary Fitzsimmons , the Dallas County District Clerk.
/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE