alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
`Exhibit
32(b)








This
Certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise
subject to the liability of that section.  This Certification shall
not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other
document pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, except as otherwise stated in
such filing.








Certification
Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63


of Title
18 of the United States Code








In
connection with the Annual Report of Public Service Company of Oklahoma (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K (the “Report”) for the year ended December 31, 2007 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Holly
Keller Koeppel, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 that, based on my knowledge (i) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.








/s/ Holly Keller
Koeppel


Holly
Keller Koeppel


Chief
Financial Officer








February 28,
2008








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
American Electric Power Company, Inc. and will be retained by American Electric
Power Company, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
No. 11-10691.

#### King *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
11586 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 48 / Wednesday, March 12, 1997 / Notices

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

[CFDA NO: 84.031A]

Strengthening Institutions Program;

New Awards for Fiscal Year (FY) 1997

Purpose of Program: This program

provides grants to eligible institutions of

higher education to improve their

academic quality, institutional

management, and fiscal stability so they

can become self-sufficient.

Applicant Information: The Secretary

announces that he will make new

awards under the Strengthening

Institutions Program with Fiscal Year

1997 funds from among the highestranked unfunded applications that were

submitted under the Strengthening

Institutions Program biennial grant

award competition for Fiscal Years 1995

and 1996. Thus, the Secretary will

award grants to eligible institutions that

submitted the highest-rated unfunded

applications under that competition.

This funding procedure will carry out

the original intent of the biennial award

process announced in the Federal

Register of March 5, 1995 (60 FR

12543). The Department will soon

contact by telephone those institutions

being considered for new awards.

The Department developed the

biennial award process to allow an

institution to submit one grant

application that could be considered for

funding over two successive funding

cycles, thereby eliminating the need for

an institution to generate and submit a

second application. However, this

process was not implemented during FY

1996, the second year of the biennium,

because the Strengthening Institutions

Program appropriation for that year was

insufficient to make new awards.

FOR INFORMATION CONTACT: Louis J.

Venuto, U.S. Department of Education,

600 Independence Avenue, S.W.,

Portals Building, Suite CY–80,

Washington, D.C. 20202–5335.

Telephone: (202) 708–8839. Individuals

who use a telecommunications device

for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal

Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–

800–877–8339 between 8 a.m. and 8

p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through

Friday.

Information about the Department’s

funding opportunities, including copies

of application notices for discretionary

grant competitions, can be viewed on

the Department’s electronic bulletin

board (ED Board), telephone (202) 260–

9950; on the Internet Gopher Server (at

gopher://gcs.ed.gov); or on the World

Wide Web (at http://gcs.ed.gov).

However, the official application notice

for a discretionary grant competition is

the notice published in the Federal

Register.

Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1057.

Dated: March 6, 1997.

David A. Longanecker,

Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary

Education.

[FR Doc. 97–6096 Filed 3–11–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
# C_2022303EN.01004801.xml

| 8.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 303/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 303/48

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 21 June 2022 — Ismailova v Council

(Case T-234/22 R)

(Interim Relief - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures adopted in respect of Russia’s actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine - Freezing of funds - Application for interim measures - No urgency - Balancing of interests)

(2022/C 303/62)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Gulbakhor Ismailova (Tachkent, Uzbekistan) (represented by: J. Grand d’Esnon, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: B. Dreissen and A. Vitro, acting as Agents)

Re:

By her application under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU, the applicant seeks, in essence, suspension of operation of, first, two acts by which the criteria for inclusion on the list of persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictive measures on the basis of their involvement in actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine was amended and, second, two acts by which her name was added to that list. Specifically, the applicant seeks, first, the suspension of operation of Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/582 of 8 April 2022 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (OJ 2022 L 110, p. 55), in so far as that act concerns her, of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/581 of 8 April 2022 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (OJ 2022 L 110, p. 3), in so far as that act concerns her, of Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/329 of 25 February 2022 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (OJ 2022 L 50, p. 1), and of Council Regulation (EU) 2022/330 of 25 February 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (OJ 2022 L 51, p. 1); second, in the alternative, suspension of operation of Decision 2022/581 in so far as that act concerns her, of Article 1(2)(f) and (g) of Decision 2022/329 and of Article 1(1)(f) and (g) of Regulation 2022/330; and, third, that the Council of the European Union be ordered to pay her the sum of EUR 20 000 in respect of the costs which she incurred for defending her interests.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim relief is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim relief is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

January 25, 2013

s0122

Order 

January 25, 2013

145861

VINCENT RUSSELL COATES,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 145861

COA: 307096

Luce CC: 10-005273-AH

ALGER CORRECTIONAL FACILITY

WARDEN,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 26, 2012 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
# C_2023338EN.01002202.xml

| 25.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 338/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 338/22

---

Judgment of the General Court of 26 July 2023 — Mood Media Netherlands v EUIPO — Tailoradio (RADIO MOOD In-store Radio, made easy)

(Case T-663/22) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark RADIO MOOD In-store Radio, made easy - Earlier EU figurative mark MOOD:MIX - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

(2023/C 338/29)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Mood Media Netherlands BV (Naarden, Netherlands) (represented by: A. M. Pecoraro, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Frydendahl, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Tailoradio Srl (Milan, Italy) (represented by A. Sobol and S. Bernardini, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 23 August 2022 (Case R 1853/2018-5).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mood Media Netherlands BV to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by Tailoradio Srl in the proceedings before the General Court; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mood Media Netherlands BV to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by Tailoradio Srl in the proceedings before the General Court;

| 3. | Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  
  OJ C 7, 9.1.2023.

---
# C_2023007EN.01003801.xml

| 9.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 7/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 7/38

---

Action brought on 31 October 2022 — Tavitova v EUIPO — Uccoar (AURUS)

(Case T-662/22)

(2023/C 7/46)

Language in which the application was lodged: French

Parties

Applicant: Zalina Tavitova (Batoulieh, Lebanon) (represented by: V. Kojevnikov, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Uccoar (Carcassonne, France)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark AURUS — Application for registration No 18 205 163

Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 August 2022 in Case R 2139/2021-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | confirm the contested decision in so far as it allowed the registration of mark No 18 205 163, for non-alcoholic beverages, with the exception of non-alcoholic wine; |
| --- | --- |

—

confirm the contested decision in so far as it allowed the registration of mark No 18 205 163, for non-alcoholic beverages, with the exception of non-alcoholic wine;

| — | annul the contested decision refusing registration of mark No 18 205 163, for the goods and classes ‘beers’ (Class 32) and ‘vodka’ (Class 33); |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision refusing registration of mark No 18 205 163, for the goods and classes ‘beers’ (Class 32) and ‘vodka’ (Class 33);

| — | grant the application for registration of mark No 18 205 163 for the classes and goods indicated; |
| --- | --- |

—

grant the application for registration of mark No 18 205 163 for the classes and goods indicated;

| — | dismiss the company Uccoar’s contrary applications and form of order sought; |
| --- | --- |

—

dismiss the company Uccoar’s contrary applications and form of order sought;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and the Council.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                         5

<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                     APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                       SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                                  170730
<SECURITIES>                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          1064868
<ALLOWANCES>                                            123000
<INVENTORY>                                                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       1207744
<PP&E>                                                  192364
<DEPRECIATION>                                          133609
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         1783053
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  2277804
<BONDS>                                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                               1000
<COMMON>                                                243199
<OTHER-SE>                                            (1173570)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           1783053
<SALES>                                                2697539
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       2697539
<CGS>                                                  1566868
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        906194
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       36592
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         418928
<INCOME-TAX>                                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     418928
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                            418928
<EPS-BASIC>                                             0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0.02


</TABLE>
**Exhibit31.01**

 

## **CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Patricia K. Vincent, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of PublicService Company of Colorado;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand we have:

 

a)         designed such disclosure controls and procedures orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

 

b)        evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)         disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):

 

a)         all significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial data; and

 

b)        any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 
|                    | /s/ PATRICIA K. VINCENT               |   |
|-------------------------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                    | Patricia K. Vincent                   |
|                    | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                    |
| Date: February 24, 2006 |

 

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.1





Certification Pursuant to


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Telestone Technologies Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Han Daqing, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated: August 15, 2011





By:
/s/ Han DaqingName:
Han DaqingTitle:
Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
#### Jason P. SHURNAS; et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Jan Lynn OWEN, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the California Department of Business Oversight (formerly State of California Department of Corporations) and State of California, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 16-17277

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted December 8, 2017 San Francisco, California

Filed February 26, 2018

Paul Asterlin, Asterlin & Riazi, LLP, Sacramento, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants

Jill Bowers, Esquire, Deputy Attorney General, AGCA-Office of the California Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, Craig D. Rust, Esquire, California State Attorney General Business & Tax Section, Sacramento, CA, for Defendants-Appellees

Before: M. SMITH and IKUTA, Circuit Judges, and HUMETEWA,* District Judge.

*

**The Honorable Diane J. Humetewa, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM **

Jason Shurnas appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his first amended complaint. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review the dismissal of a complaint for failure to state a claim de novo. *Morrison v. Peterson,*809 F.3d 1059, 1064 (9th Cir. 2015).

Shurnas contends that section 25532 of the California Corporations Code is facially unconstitutional because it fails to provide sufficient notice that a recipient must request a hearing within 30 days after receiving a desist-and-refrain order. Shur-nas’s challenge fails because section 25532 adequately describes the remedies available to a recipient of a desist-and-refrain order, and the state is not required to provide ‘‘individualized notice of state-law remedies.” *City of W. Covina v. Perkins,*525 U.S. 234, 241, 119 S.Ct. 678, 142 L.Ed.2d 636 (1999). The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying leave to amend because any amendment would have been futile. *Cervantes v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.,*656 F.3d 1034, 1041 (9th Cir. 2011).

To the extent that Shurnas attempts to challenge section 25532 on the ground that it does not comply with procedural due process under *Mathews v. Eldridge,*424 *687U.S. 319, 96 S.Ct. 893, 47 L.Ed.2d 18 (1976), such a challenge was not argued specifically and distinctly in his opening brief. Because “[w]e review only issues which are argued specifically and distinctly in a party’s opening brief,” *Greenwood v. FAA,*28 F.3d 971, 977 (9th Cir. 1994), we do not address it.1

AFFIRMED

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

1

. We deny Owen’s motion to strike Shurnas’s Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 28(j) letter as moot.
Year 2000 Total Fluoride by Line Lb F/Ton of Aluminum Produced

L2 L3 L4 L5 L6 A398 Plant

Jan-00 2.21 5.88 1.93 1.63 1.76 1.87 2.68

Feb-00 2.74 6.24 2.57 1.69 1.84 2.09 3.02

Mar-00 2.46 6.67 2.40 1.97 1.79 2.07 3.06

Apr-00 1.49 5.80 1.62 1.91 1.67 1.69 2.44

May-00 1.83 7.28 2.70 2.09 1.64 1.85 3.11

Jun-00 2.16 8.02 5.72 2.30 1.93 2.13 4.03

Jul-00 1.87 8.48 4.27 1.38 2.22 1.82 3.64

Aug-00 1.02 8.64 5.84 1.66 1.42 1.37 3.72

Sep-00 1.56 11.02 5.10 1.80 2.63 2.00 4.42

Oct-00 0.90 8.28 2.52 1.54 1.38 1.27 2.92

Nov-00 0.74 1.24 1.03 1.25 1.25 1.08 1.10

Dec-00 0.77 1.03 0.84 0.95 1.22 0.98 0.96

QTR 1 2.47 6.26 2.30 1.76 1.80 2.01 2.92

QTR 2 1.83 7.03 3.35 2.10 1.75 1.89 3.19

QTR 3 1.48 9.38 5.07 1.61 2.09 1.73 3.93

QTR 4 0.80 3.52 1.46 1.25 1.28 1.11 1.66

YR_2000 1.65 6.55 3.05 1.68 1.73 1.69 2.93
2.92

3.19

3.93

Lines 2, 5, and 6 under MACT

Commission the GTC (B3 and B4)

1.66
<PAGE>   1

                                                                 EXHIBIT 23 (ii)


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of
RVM Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries, as reporting company successor to Ravens
Metal Products, Inc., on Form S-8 filed June 6, 1994 of our report dated June 6,
1997 on our audits of the consolidated financial statements and financial
statement schedule of RVM Industries, Inc. as of March 31, 1997, and for each of
the years ended March 31, 1997 and 1996, which report is included in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.

                                           /S/ COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.

Cleveland, Ohio
June 24, 1998




                                       58