alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 49 (Thursday, March 13, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 11768]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6396]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
14 CFR Parts 91, 93, 121 and 135

[Docket No. 28537; Amendment Number 93-73 and SFAR No. 50-2]
RIN 2120-AF93


Special Flight Rules in the Vicinity of the Rocky Mountain 
National Park; Correction

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule, correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains a correction to the final rule 
published in the Federal Register (61 FR 69302) on December 31, 1996. 
The final rule is one part of an overall strategy to further reduce the 
impact of aircraft noise on the park environment and to assist the 
National Park Service in achieving its statutory mandate, imposed by 
Public Law 100-91, to provide for the substantial restoration of 
natural quiet and experience in Grand Canyon National Park.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 1, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Neil Saunders, (202-267-8783).

Correction of Publication

    In the rule document (FR Doc. 96-33146) on page 69302 in the issue 
of Tuesday, December 31, 1996, Amendment numbers were inserted 
incorrectly, and an SFAR number was omitted in the docket line of the 
heading. Please make the following corrections: On page 69302, column 
1, in the heading, the docket line in brackets is corrected to read as 
set forth above.

    Issued in Washington, DC on March 5, 1997.
Donald P. Byrne,
Assistant Chief Counsel.
[FR Doc. 97-6396 Filed 3-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 49 (Thursday, March 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 11851]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6290]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

HQ USAF Scientific Advisory Board Meeting

    The Air Platforms Panel Meeting, relating to the DDR&E Technology 
Area Review and Assessment (TARA) Team, in support of the HQ USAF 
Scientific Advisory Board, will meet on March 24-28, 1997 at Wright-
Patterson AFB OH from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    The purpose of the meeting is to assess the progress being made 
toward achieving S&T objectives stated in the Defense S&T Strategy, the 
Joint Warfighting S&T Plan, and the Defense Technology Area Plans 
(DTAPs).
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with section 
552b of Title 5, United States Code, specifically subparagraphs (1) and 
(4) thereof.
    For further information, contact the HQ USAF Scientific Advisory 
Board Secretariat at (703) 697-8404.
Carolyn A. Lunsford,
Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-6290 Filed 3-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3910-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000081100
<NAME> PUGET SOUND ENERGY, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    3,250,461
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    279,644
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         348,389
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                             0
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 614,876
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,493,370
<COMMON>                                       845,606
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      450,845
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             61,626
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               1,358,077
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           78,134
<PREFERRED>                                     95,488
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         1,411,707
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             248,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                 124,538
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   51,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               1,126,426
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                4,493,370
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    1,676,902
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            47,725
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   1,413,311
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   1,461,036
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        215,866
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                              28,066
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 243,932
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       118,234
<NET-INCOME>                                   123,076
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                     17,806
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  105,741
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       150,591
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       98,434
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         129,698
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.25


</TABLE>
# C_2022418EN.01003701.xml

| 31.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 418/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 418/37

---

Order of the General Court of 6 September 2022 — Etablissements Nicolas v EUIPO — St. Nicolaus (NICOLAS)

(Case T-340/22) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)

(2022/C 418/51)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Etablissements Nicolas (Thiais, France) (represented by: T. de Haan, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: St. Nicolaus a.s. (Liptovský Mikuláš, Slovakia)

Re:

By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 28 March 2022 (Case R 1780/2020-4).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | Etablissements Nicolas shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Etablissements Nicolas shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

---

(1)  OJ C 284, 25.7.2022.

---
No. 11-10735.

#### Villasenor *v.*United States.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MAY 22, 2014

NO. 03-13-00858-CV

M. Z. and R. B., Appellants

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 428TH DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GOODWIN, AND FIELD

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the order of termination signed by the trial court on December 5, 2013. 

Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no 

reversible error in the trial court’s order. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s order of 

termination. Because appellants are indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs 

is made.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 49 (Thursday, March 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 11947]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6259]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

March 5, 1997.
    The Department of Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

U.S. Customs Service (CUS)

    OMB Number: New.
    Form Number: CF 446.
    Type of Review: New collection.
    Title: North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) Certificate of 
Origin Verification Questionnaire.
    Description: The objectives of NAFTA are to eliminate barriers to 
trade in goods and services between the United States, Mexico, and 
Canada; facilitate conditions of fair competition within the free trade 
area; liberalize significantly conditions for investments within the 
free trade area; establish effective procedures for the joint 
administration of the NAFTA; and the resolution of disputes.
    Respondents: Business or other for-profit, Individuals or 
households, Not-for-profit institutions, Federal Government.
    Estimated Number of Respondents/Recordkeepers: 5,000.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent/Recordkeeper: 1 hour.
    Frequency of Response: On occasion.
    Estimated Total Reporting/Recordkeeping Burden: 24,000 hours.
    Clearance Officer: J. Edgar Nichols (202) 927-1426, U.S. Customs 
Service, Printing and Records Management Branch, Room 6216, 1301 
Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20229.
    OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt (202) 395-7860, Office of 
Management and Budget, Room 10202, New Executive Office Building, 
Washington, DC 20503.
Dale A. Morgan,
Departmental Reports Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-6259 Filed 3-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4820-02-P
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, James E. Skinner, certify that:

 

1.    I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.;

 

2.    Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.    Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.    The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)    designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)    evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c)    disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s first fiscal quarter) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

5.    The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)    allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b)    anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

Date: March 8, 2004

 
|   |   |
|--------|--------|
|   |   | /s/    JAMES E. SKINNER |
|   |   | **James E. Skinner** |
|   |   | **Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer** |
|        |        |  |  |

 

1

----
# C_2022424EN.01003301.xml

| 7.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 424/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 424/33

---

Appeal brought on 7 September 2022 by Ryanair DAC against the judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 22 June 2022 in Case T-657/20, Ryanair v Commission (Finnair II; Covid-19)

(Case C-588/22 P)

(2022/C 424/44)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Ryanair DAC (represented by: V. Blanc and F.-C. Laprévote, avocats, D. Pérez de Lamo and S. Rating, abogados, E. Vahida, avocat)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission, French Republic, Republic of Finland

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:

| — | set aside the judgment under appeal; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the judgment under appeal;

| — | declare in accordance with Articles 263 and 264 TFEU that European Commission Decision C(2020) 3970 final of 9 June 2020 on State aid SA.57410 (2020/N) — Finland COVID-19: Recapitalisation of Finnair is void; and |
| --- | --- |

—

declare in accordance with Articles 263 and 264 TFEU that European Commission Decision C(2020) 3970 final of 9 June 2020 on State aid SA.57410 (2020/N) — Finland COVID-19: Recapitalisation of Finnair is void; and

| — | order the Commission to bear its own costs and pay those incurrent by the appellant, and order the interveners at first instance and in this appeal (if any) to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to bear its own costs and pay those incurrent by the appellant, and order the interveners at first instance and in this appeal (if any) to bear their own costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the appellant relies on four pleas in law.

First, the General Court erred in law and manifestly distorted the facts in rejecting the existence of ‘serious doubts’ concerning the misapplication of the Temporary Framework and Article 107(3)(b) TFEU.

Second, the General Court erred in law and manifestly distorted the facts in rejecting the existence of ‘serious doubts’ concerning the infringement of the non-discrimination and proportionality principles.

Third, the General Court erred in law and manifestly distorted the facts in rejecting the existence of ‘serious doubts’ concerning the infringement of the fundamental freedoms of establishment and provision of services.

Fourth, the General Court and the Commission failed to adequately state reasons.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 97 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 97

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 16, 2019

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To amend the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 to 
    authorize rewards for thwarting wildlife trafficking linked to 
         transnational organized crime, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Rescuing Animals With Rewards Act of 
2019'' or the ``RAWR Act''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS; SENSE OF CONGRESS.

    (a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
            (1) Wildlife trafficking is a major transnational crime 
        that is estimated to generate over $10 billion a year in 
        illegal profits and which is increasingly perpetrated by 
        organized, sophisticated criminal enterprises, including known 
        terrorist organizations.
            (2) Wildlife trafficking not only threatens endangered 
        species worldwide, but also jeopardizes local security, spreads 
        disease, undermines rule of law, fuels corruption, and damages 
        economic development.
            (3) Combating wildlife trafficking requires a coordinated 
        and sustained approach at the global, regional, national, and 
        local levels.
            (4) Congress stated in the Eliminate, Neutralize, and 
        Disrupt Wildlife Trafficking Act of 2016 that it is the policy 
        of the United States to take immediate actions to stop the 
        illegal global trade in wildlife and wildlife products and 
        associated transnational organized crime.
    (b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that the 
Department of State's rewards program is a powerful tool in combating 
sophisticated international crime and that the Department of State and 
Federal law enforcement should work in concert to offer rewards that 
target wildlife traffickers.

SEC. 3. REWARDS FOR JUSTICE.

    Subparagraph (B) of section 36(k)(5) of the State Department Basic 
Authorities Act of 1956 (22 U.S.C. 2708(k)(5)) is amended by inserting 
``wildlife trafficking (as defined by section 2(12) of the Eliminate, 
Neutralize, and Disrupt Wildlife Trafficking Act of 2016 (16 U.S.C. 
7601(12); Public Law 114-231)) and'' after ``includes''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 15, 2019.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
No. 11-10488.

#### Henneghan *v.*Roach et al.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# C_2023321EN.01001501.xml

| 11.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 321/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 321/15

---

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 13 July 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof — Germany) — Gemeinde A v Finanzamt

(Case C-344/22, (1) Gemeinde A)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Common system of value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Article 2(1)(c) - Supply of services for consideration - Bodies governed by public law - Municipality collecting a spa tax for the provision of spa facilities accessible to everyone)

(2023/C 321/18)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesfinanzhof

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Gemeinde A

Defendant: Finanzamt

Operative part of the judgment

Article 2(1)(c) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax

must be interpreted as meaning that the provision of spa facilities by a municipality does not constitute a ‘supply of services for consideration’, within the meaning of that provision, where, on the basis of municipal by-laws, that municipality imposes a spa tax of a certain amount per day’s stay on visitors staying in the municipality, when the obligation to pay that tax is linked not to the use of those facilities but to the stay in the municipal territory and those facilities are freely and gratuitously accessible to everyone.

---

(1)  
  OJ C 398, 17.10.2022.

---
No. 11-10545.

#### Ware *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Exhibit 10.7


 


CLEANTECH ACQUISITION
CORP.

207 West 25th Street, 9th Floor


New York, NY 10001


 


__________, 2021


 


CHARDAN CAPITAL MARKETS, LLC

17 State Street, Suite 2100


New York, NY 10004


 


Ladies and Gentlemen:


 


This letter will confirm our
agreement that, commencing on the effective date (the “Effective Date”) of the registration statement (the “Registration
Statement”) for the initial public offering (the “IPO”) of the securities of CleanTech Acquisition
Corp. (the “Company”) and continuing until the earlier of (i) the consummation by the Company of an initial
business combination or (ii) the Company’s liquidation (in each case as described in the Registration Statement) (such earlier
date hereinafter referred to as the “Termination Date”), Chardan Capital Markets, LLC (“Chardan”)
shall make available to the Company certain office space, secretarial and administrative services as may be required by the Company from
time to time, situated at 207 West 25th Street, 9th Floor, New York, NY 10001 (or any successor location). In exchange therefore, the
Company shall pay Chardan a sum not to exceed $10,000 per month, respectively, on the Effective Date and continuing monthly thereafter
until the Termination Date. Chardan hereby agrees that it does not have any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to any monies
that may be set aside in a trust account (the “Trust Account”) that may be established by the Company for the
benefit of the Company’s public stockholders upon the consummation of the IPO as described in the Registration Statement (“Claim”),
and hereby waives any Claim it may have in the future as a result of, or arising out of, any negotiations, contracts or agreements with
the Company, and will not seek recourse against the Trust Account for any reason whatsoever.


 


	 	 	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	CLEANTECH ACQUISITION CORP.
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	By:	 
	 	 	 	Name: 	Eli Spiro
	 	 	 	Title:	Chief Executive Officer
	 	 	 	 	 
	AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY:	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	CHARDAN CAPITAL MARKETS, LLC	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	By:	 	 	 
	Name:	 	 	 
	Title:
December 14, 2015

Mr. Renato De Castro

Rylan Aerial Media

134 Buffet Key

Boynton Beach, FL 33426

Dear Mr. De Castro :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption. It

explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can n ot Process Your Request

We received your July 15, 2015

, exemption request filed in Docket No. FAA− 2015

− 4336 , but

we are unable to process your request any further as a result of a discrepancy in your petition

. The name of the petitioner is inconsistent in your petition. For us to consider the request any

further, you must clarify the name of the petitioner and resubmit a revise d petition to your

docket

.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions

, you may call the 333 Information Line at (202) 267

- 2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Divisio n