alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Dismiss and Opinion Filed September 25, 2018 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00509-CV 

MARIO SCAFETTI, Appellant 

V. 

RUBEN DELUIS, Appellee 

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. CC-17-06183-B 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Evans, and Justice Brown 

Opinion by Chief Justice Wright 

The filing fee, docketing statement, and clerk’s record in this case are past due. By postcard 

dated May 4, 2018, we notified appellant the $205 filing fee was due. We directed appellant to 

remit the filing fee within ten days and expressly cautioned appellant that failure to do so would 

result in dismissal of the appeal. Also by postcard dated May 4, 2018, we informed appellant the 

docketing statement in this case was due. We cautioned appellant that failure to file the docketing 

statement within ten days might result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. By 

letter dated June 6, 2018, we informed appellant the clerk’s record had not been filed because 

appellant had not paid for the clerk’s record. We directed appellant to provide, within ten days, 

written verification of payment or arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record or written verification 

appellant had been found entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We cautioned appellant 
 –2– 

that failure to do so would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date, 

appellant has not paid the filing fee, provided the required documentation, or otherwise 

corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal. 

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b), 42.3 (b), (c). 

180509F.P05 

 

/Carolyn Wright/ 

CAROLYN WRIGHT 

CHIEF JUSTICE 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

MARIO SCAFETTI, Appellant 

No. 05-18-00509-CV V. 

RUBEN DELUIS, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the County Court at Law 

No. 2, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. CC-17-06183-B. 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. 

Justices Evans and Brown participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED. 

 It is ORDERED that appellee RUBEN DELUIS recover his costs of this appeal from 

appellant MARIO SCAFETTI. 

Judgment entered September 25, 2018.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 113 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 113

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      February 8, 2019.
    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are hereby, elected to 
the following standing committee of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on Ethics: Mr. Ratcliffe, Mr. Holding, Mrs. Walorski, Mr. Guest.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. Section #1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q ("Form 10-Q") of Galaxy
Nutritional  Foods,  Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2005
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof,  I,
Michael E. Broll, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The  information  contained in the Form 10-Q fairly  presents,  in all
      material  respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of
      the Company.



                                               /s/ Michael E. Broll
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Michael E. Broll
                                               Chief Executive Officer
                                               February 21, 2006
U.S. Department of Homeland Security 

601 South 12th Street 

Arlington, VA 20598-6028 

Transportation JUN 0 3 2010 Security 

Administration 

Mr. Randall S. Fiertz 

Director of Airport Compliance and Field Operations 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S W 

Washington, DC 20591 

Dear Mr. Fiertz: 

We are in receipt of your letter dated March 29,2010 requesting the Transportation 

Security Administration's (TSA) position on the Through-the-Fence (TTF) activities specific to 

the security impact of residences both on airport and those with direct access to the airport. 

TSA does not restrict TTF activities occurring at general aviation or commercial airports. 

While TSA does not currently regulate general aviation airports it does regulate commercial 

airports for security, per 49 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 1542. TSA does not prohibit TTF 

activities; as such TSA has issued no policy guidance specific to these activities. The security 

rules and procedures for allowing TTF activities at commercial airports, generally, are described 

in an individual airport's TSA-approved security program. Airport security program 

requirements are subject to TSA compliance and enforcement efforts to ensure airports are 

meeting requirements set forth in their individual programs. With that, TSA does support airport 

operators, working in partnership with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and TSA, to 

ensure that TTF activities occur, as practicable, for legitimate business and operational needs 

only. To the extent possible, leisure and recreational events, facilitated by TTF activities, should 

be minimized. 

Thank you for your request and if you have further questions, please do not hesitate to 

contact me at (571) 227-1870. 

Sincerely yours, 

Douglas Hofsass 

Deputy Assistant dministrator 

Transportation Sector Network Management
No. 11-11037.

#### Cardenas *v.*California.

Sup. Ct. Cal. Cer-tiorari denied.
No. 11-11044.

#### Hagins *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Template for State Requests for Security Funds

Mark Robbins, Interim Executive Director

U.S. Election Assistance Commission

633 3rd Street, NW, Suite 200

Washington, DC 20001

Dear Mr. Robbins:

The purpose of this letter is to certify that the State of [Name] will use the funds provided 

under the Notice of Grant Award, Agreement # [Number], for activities consistent with the

laws described in Section 906 of HAVA and will not use the funds in a manner that is 

inconsistent with the requirements of Title III of HAVA.

We further certify that we have reviewed and accept the terms of the award as specified in 

the Notice of Grant Award. Our UEI number (formerly DUNS) is [UEI number] and the 

signed Standard Certifications are enclosed.

We are requesting [$ amount] at this time. We will develop the program narrative and 

combined Election Security program budget by the required timeline in the 2022 ES Award 

Packet and Instructions. 

If you have any questions about this request, please contact [Name] at [phone number] or 

[email].

Sincerely,

[Secretary of State Name]

[Title]

Cc.

Kinza Ghaznavi, Grants Director, Grants@eac.gov
No. 12-5352.

#### Yelverton *v.*District of Columbia Office of Bar Counsel.

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.
|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| 1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. for the fiscal year end December 31, 2017; and |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|               |
|---------------|
|               |  |
| March 5, 2018 | /s/ Jenny L. Apker |
|          | Jenny L. Apker |
|          | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Southwestern Water Exploration Co. ("SWWE") on Form 10-QSB for the six months ended
September 30, 2001 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven B. Misner, chairman and chief executive officer of SWWE, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|/s/STEVEN B. MISNERSteven B. Misner
Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer
|------------------------------------------------------------------------

August 17, 2002

---

QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION   EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
REGISTRANTS  THIRD  QUARTER 1999  CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE  SHEET AND  CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT  OF  OPERATIONS  FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED  SEPTEMBER  30, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       2,217,723
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               25,812,578
<ALLOWANCES>                                 3,141,622
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       6,952,836
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,199,002
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              56,540,187
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     26,768,911
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,179,299
<COMMON>                                    20,118,701
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,521,253
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                56,540,187
<SALES>                                     17,962,302
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            30,194,603
<CGS>                                        2,538,162
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,712,386
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               577,428
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,067,782
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,061,002
<INCOME-TAX>                                   418,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            621,830
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   621,830
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.14


</TABLE>
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 949 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow charitable organizations to make statements relating to political campaigns if such statements are made in the ordinary course of carrying out its tax exempt 

purpose. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 4, 2019 

Mr. SCALISE (for himself, Mr. HICE of Georgia, and Mr. JOHNSON of Louisiana) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow charitable organizations to make statements relating to political campaigns if such statements are made in the ordinary course of carrying out its tax exempt purpose. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Free Speech Fairness 

5 Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 949 IH

1 SEC. 2. ALLOWING 501(c)(3) ORGANIZATION TO MAKE 

2 STATEMENTS RELATING TO POLITICAL CAM3 PAIGN IN ORDINARY COURSE OF CARRYING 

4 OUT ITS TAX EXEMPT PURPOSE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 501 of the Internal Rev6 enue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the 

7 following new subsection: 

8 ‘‘(s) SPECIAL RULE RELATING TO POLITICAL CAM9 PAIGN STATEMENTS OF ORGANIZATION DESCRIBED IN

10 SUBSECTION (c)(3).— 

11 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of subsection 

12 (c)(3) and sections 170(c)(2), 2055, 2106, 2522, 

13 and 4955, an organization shall not fail to be treat14 ed as organized and operated exclusively for a pur15 pose described in subsection (c)(3), nor shall it be 

16 deemed to have participated in, or intervened in any 

17 political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) 

18 any candidate for public office, solely because of the 

19 content of any statement which— 

20 ‘‘(A) is made in the ordinary course of the 

21 organization’s regular and customary activities 

22 in carrying out its exempt purpose, and 

23 ‘‘(B) results in the organization incurring 

24 not more than de minimis incremental ex25 penses.’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 949 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 this section shall apply to taxable years ending after the 

3 date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Galaxy  Nutritional  Foods, Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended  September  30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Angelo S.  Morini,  Chairman,  President  and  Chief  Executive  Officer  of the
Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.


                                /s/ Angelo S. Morini
                                --------------------
                                Angelo S. Morini
                                Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
                                November 8, 2002
No. 12-47.

#### Garcia *v.*Whirlpool Corp.

C. A. 6th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
# F **ourth Court of Appeals**

**San Antonio, Texas**

December 13, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00286

- CV

Jimmy MASPERO and Regina Maspero, Individually, and as Next Friends

of Wyitt Maspero, Wynnsday Maspero, Wesley Maspero, Deceased,

and Walter Maspero, Deceased, Minor Children

, Appellant s

v.

CITY OF SAN ANTONIO,

Appellee

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CI14946

Honorable David Peeples, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellant ’ s reply brief i s due on December 20 , 2018

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(c).

Before t he due date , Appellant filed a n unopposed first motion for a n exten sion of time to file the

reply brief.

Appellant ’ s motion is GRANTED. Appellant ’ s reply brief is due on January 2, 2019.

See id. R. 38.6(d).

It is so ORDERED on December 13, 2018

.



### PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

__________________ _______ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
**Exhibit 23.2****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements pertaining to theUnited States Lime & Minerals, Inc. 1992 Stock Option Plan, as Amended and Restated, (Form S-8 Nos.33-58311 and 333-101290) and in the Registration Statement pertaining to the United States Lime &Minerals, Inc. 2001 Long-Term Incentive Plan (Form S-8 No. 333-90876), of our report dated March17, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of United States Lime & Minerals,Inc. and subsidiaries included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,2006.ERNST & YOUNG LLPDallas, Texas
# t19p01p1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6219
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. STEVEN AUBREY BURNETTE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (7:99-cr-00109-jct-mfu-1; 7:08-cv-80019-jct-mfu) Submitted: May 1, 2008 Decided: June 9, 2008 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Steven Aubrey Burnette, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Jack Bondurant, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.*Although Burnette characterized the motion as one under 28 U.S.C. § 1651 ( 2000), the district court properly construed the motion as a § 2255 proceeding. See In re Vial , 115 F.3d 1192, 1194 (4th Cir. 1997) (en banc). - 2 - PER CURIAM: Steven Aubrey Burnette seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying as successive his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. * The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Burnette has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Burnette’s motion for certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We also deny Burnette’s motions for appointment of counsel and for the preparation of a transcript at the Government’s expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions- 3 - are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# monthprod1989
#### BROOKWORTH PARTNERS, LP v. FRANKFORD MACHINERY

2967 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/26/2017

No. 2013-08010 (Delaware)

Affirmed
# C_2022222EN.01003902.xml

| 7.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 222/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 222/39

---

Action brought on 22 April 2022 — Synesis v Council

(Case T-215/22)

(2022/C 222/64)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Synesis TAA (Minsk, Belarus) (represented by: G. Lansky and A. Egger, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | pursuant to Article 263 TFEU, annul Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2022/307 of 24 February 2022 implementing Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Belarus (OJ 2022 L 46, p. 97) and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/300 of 24 February 2022 implementing Article 8a(1) of Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in respect of Belarus (OJ 2022 L 46, p. 3), in so far as they concern the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

pursuant to Article 263 TFEU, annul Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2022/307 of 24 February 2022 implementing Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Belarus (OJ 2022 L 46, p. 97) and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/300 of 24 February 2022 implementing Article 8a(1) of Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in respect of Belarus (OJ 2022 L 46, p. 3), in so far as they concern the applicant;

| — | pursuant to Article 134 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court, order the Council to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

pursuant to Article 134 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court, order the Council to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the argument that the contested measures are unlawful in so far as they concern the applicant, the applicant relies on a single plea in law, alleging that the Council committed a manifest error of assessment and in particular infringed its examination obligations. In the applicant’s view, the Council failed to provide any concrete evidence to justify the validity of the applicant’s inclusion on the list in the contested measures.

---
EX-10.16






 Exhibit 10.16 

August [__], 2017 
 [Director Name] 

[Address] 
 CD&R Waterworks Board
Compensation 
 Dear [Director Name]: 
 We
are pleased that you have agreed to become a member of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of HD Supply Waterworks, Ltd. (the “Partnership”). This letter sets forth our mutual agreement as to the compensation that
you are entitled to be paid in that role. 
  

	 	•	 	 Annual Fee. The annual fee for each calendar year of service on the Board will be $90,000, which will be
paid in cash in quarterly installments in arrears. There will be no meeting or committee fees. The first installment of the fee will be prorated for the period beginning September 1, 2017 through the end of the third quarter.



  

	 	•	 	 [Chairman Fee. For chairing the Board’s [Audit/Compensation] Committee, you will be paid an
additional fee of $[A: 20,000][C: 15,000]. This fee will be paid in the same manner as the annual fee and will also be prorated for 2017.] 


  

	 	•	 	 Purchased Equity. You will have an opportunity to purchase up to $1,000,000 worth of common units in the
Partnership. This is the same equity as purchased by the CD&R investment funds and will be purchased at the same price as the CD&R investment funds. For technical reasons, employee and director equity investments will be made through a
feeder entity in a back-to-back arrangement, but the underlying terms and economics will be the same as if you had invested in the Partnership directly.



  

	 	•	 	 Incentive Awards. At the time of your equity purchase, you will receive a
one-time grant of $100,000 worth of profits interests in the Partnership (also through the back-to-back arrangement mentioned
above). The vesting of profits interests will be based on continued service over the five year period beginning August 1, 2017 (the closing date of the acquisition of the business by CD&R investment funds). 



 

	 	•	 	 Expense Reimbursement. You will be reimbursed for reasonable and customary expenses incurred by you in
connection with your attending meetings of the Board or its committees. 


 If you have any questions about the foregoing,
please feel free to contact me. We look forward to working with you. 
 Sincerely, 

HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS, LTD. 

Stephen LeClair 

President and Chief Executive Officer
No. 12-5136.

#### Mendiola *v.*Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-10600.

#### Summers *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.