alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23

       Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors

We consent to the use of our report dated February 18, 2000,
included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Reynolds Metals
Company for the year ended December 31, 1999, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-K.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of
Reynolds Metals Company listed in Item 14(a).  This schedule is
the responsibility of the Company's management.  Our
responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits.  In
our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above,
when considered in relation to the basic financial statements
taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the
information set forth therein.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the:

 .  Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-13822) pertaining
   to the Reynolds Metals Company 1987 Nonqualified Stock
   Option Plan,

 .  Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-44400) pertaining
   to the Reynolds Metals Company 1992 Nonqualified Stock
   Option Plan,

 .  Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-20498) pertaining
   to the Reynolds Metals Company Savings and Investment
   Plan for Salaried Employees,

 .  Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 33-43443) pertaining
   to the shelf registration of debt securities of Reynolds
   Metals Company,

 .  Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-66032) pertaining
   to the Reynolds Metals Company Savings Plan for Hourly
   Employees,

 .  Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-53847) pertaining
   to the Employees Savings Plan,

 .  Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-53851) pertaining
   to the Reynolds Metals Company Restricted Stock Plan for
   Outside Directors,

 .  Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 33-59168) pertaining
   to the registration of debt securities of Reynolds
   Aluminum Company of Canada, Ltd. (formerly known as
   Canadian Reynolds Metals Company Limited),

 .  Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-00929)
   pertaining to the Reynolds Metals Company Performance
   Incentive Plan,

<PAGE>
 .  Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-03947)
   pertaining to the Reynolds Metals Company 1996
   Nonqualified Stock Option Plan,

 .  Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-79203)
   pertaining to the Reynolds Metals Company 1999
   Nonqualified Stock Option Plan, and

 .  Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-79563)
   pertaining to the shelf registration of debt securities
   of Reynolds Metals Company,

and in the related prospectuses of our report dated February 18,
2000, and included herein, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and schedule of Reynolds Metals Company
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 1999.


                                        ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Richmond, Virginia
March 1, 2000
No. 11-10795.

#### Johnson *v.*Knipp, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. OP 20-0171

VOLKSWAGEN AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT D/B/A VOLKSWAGEN GROUP 

AND/OR VOLKSWAGEN AG, AUDI AG, VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF 

AMERICA, INC., VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA CHATTANOOGA 

OPERATIONS, LLC, AUDI OF AMERICA, LLC, DR. ING. H.C. F. 

PORSCHE D/B/A PORSCHE AG, AND PORSCHE CARS NORTH 

AMERICA, INC.,

Petitioners,

v.

MONTANA FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, LEWIS AND CLARK 

COUNTY, THE HONORABLE JAMES P. REYNOLDS, DISTRICT JUDGE,

Respondent.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Petitioners have moved to strike Montana Department of Environmental 

Quality’s (“DEQ”) Response to Supplemental Brief of Petitioners, dated July 10, 

2020 (“Response”), to the extent it cites and attaches as Exhibit 2 an excerpt of a

deposition transcript taken in an action pending in Texas state court. DEQ does not 

oppose the motion. Good cause appearing therefor,

IT IS ORDERED that Exhibit 2 to DEQ’s Response and references thereto 

are stricken and will not be considered by the Court in resolving this matter. 

DATED this ______ day of July, 2020.

For the Court,

By 

Chief Justice

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 16 2020

07/16/2020

Case Number: OP 20-0171
# C_2023271EN.01001102.xml

| 31.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 271/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 271/11

---

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 March 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg Oost-Vlaanderen Afdeling Ghent, Belgium) — VN v Belgische Staat

(Case C-34/22, Belgische Staat) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Freedom to provide services - Free movement of capital - Restrictions - Tax legislation - Income tax - Tax exemption reserved for interest paid by banks fulfilling certain legal conditions - Indirect discrimination - Credit institutions established in Belgium and credit institutions established in another Member State of the European Union or the European Economic Area)

(2023/C 271/14)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Rechtbank van eerste aanleg Oost-Vlaanderen Afdeling, Ghent

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: VN

Defendant: Belgische Staat

Operative part of the order

Article 56 TFEU and Article 36 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area of 2 May 1992 must be interpreted as meaning that they preclude national legislation establishing a tax exemption scheme which, although applicable without distinction to remuneration relating to savings deposits held with domestic and foreign credit institutions, subjects the exemption of income from savings deposits held with credit institutions established in other Member States of the European Union or the European Economic Area to the satisfaction of conditions which must be similar to those set out in that national legislation, which are de facto specific to the national market.

---

(1)  OJ C 213, 30.5.2022.

---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 52 (Tuesday, March 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 12830]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6951]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION


Farm Credit Administration Board; Special Meeting

AGENCY: Farm Credit Administration.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the Government in the 
Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(3)), of the forthcoming special meeting 
of the Farm Credit Administration Board (Board).

DATE AND TIME: The special meeting of the Board will be held at the 
offices of the Farm Credit Administration in McLean, Virginia, on March 
20, 1997, from 9:00 a.m. until such time as the Board concludes its 
business.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Floyd Fithian, Secretary to the Farm 
Credit Administration Board, (703) 883-4025, TDD (703) 883-4444.

ADDRESSES: Farm Credit Administration, 1501 Farm Credit Drive, McLean, 
Virginia 22102-5090.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This meeting of the Board will be open to 
the public (limited space available). In order to increase the 
accessibility to Board meetings, persons requiring assistance should 
make arrangements in advance. The matters to be considered at the 
meeting are:

Open Session

A. Approval of Minutes
B. Report
    Farm Credit System Building Association Quarterly Report
C. New Business
    Regulation
    1. Disclosure to Shareholders [12 CFR Part 620](Final)
    2. Cumulative Voting for Bank Directors [12 CFR Part 615] 
(Proposed)

    Dated: March 14, 1997.
Floyd Fithian,
Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board.
[FR Doc. 97-6951 Filed 3-14-97; 2:37 pm]
BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
No. 12-5120.

#### Young *v.*Pennsylvania.

Super. Ct. Pa. Cer-tiorari denied.
|
|

|Energy Market and Economic Impacts of H.R. 2454, the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009                                                                                          
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Figure 2. Components of Cumulative Abatement in ACESA Main Cases, 2012-2030 (billion metric ton CO2-equivalent).  Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800).
|Figure 2. Components of Cumulative Abatement in ACESA Main Cases, 2012-2030 (billion metric ton CO2-equivalent).  Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800).
|Figure 2. Components of Cumulative Abatement in ACESA Main Cases, 2012-2030 (billion metric ton CO2-equivalent).  Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF NORTHLAND  CRANBERRIES,  INC. AS OF AND FOR
THE 3 MONTHS  ENDED  NOVEMBER  30,  1998 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                    SEP-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                      NOV-30-1998
<CASH>                                                    811
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          20,881
<ALLOWANCES>                                                0
<INVENTORY>                                            70,782
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       98,058
<PP&E>                                                184,036
<DEPRECIATION>                                         31,549
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        278,121
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  35,063
<BONDS>                                                78,642
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                  197
<OTHER-SE>                                            144,732
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          278,121
<SALES>                                                33,832
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       34,236
<CGS>                                                  20,357
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          13,667
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      1,303
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           212
<INCOME-TAX>                                               92
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       120
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                              120
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0.01
                                               

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22
- 0428 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. TONY RAY MANYGUNS,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including October 20 , 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 13 2023

09/13/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0428
|
|

|Energy Market and Economic Impacts of H.R. 2454, the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009                                                                                         
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Figure 3. Cumulative Allowance Bank Balance in ACESA Main Cases, 2012-2030 (million metric ton CO2-equivalent).  Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800).
|Figure 3. Cumulative Allowance Bank Balance in ACESA Main Cases, 2012-2030 (million metric ton CO2-equivalent).  Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800).
|Figure 3. Cumulative Allowance Bank Balance in ACESA Main Cases, 2012-2030 (million metric ton CO2-equivalent).  Need help, contact the National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800).
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

MARCH 24, 2009

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 08-16072

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 08-00129-CR-ORL-31-DAB

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

FRANK GONZALEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

_________________________

(March 24, 2009)

Before BLACK, CARNES and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
Frank Gonzales appeals the sophisticated means sentence enhancement that

was imposed on him after he pled guilty to eleven counts of mail fraud, in violation

of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341 and 2. On appeal, Gonzales argues he did not engage in the

complex or intricate conduct necessary for a sophisticated means enhancement

because he set up two shell companies merely as a method of stealing money from

his employer, and “[h]e did not try to disguise or launder the money in any way.”

The Sentencing Guidelines provide for an enhancement of two levels if the

offense in question “involved sophisticated means.” U.S.S.G. § 2B1.1(b)(9)(C).

Application Note 8(B) to that guideline states that:

“sophisticated means” means especially complex or especially

intricate offense conduct pertaining to the execution or concealment of

an offense. For example, in a telemarketing scheme, locating the

main office of the scheme in one jurisdiction but locating soliciting

operations in another jurisdiction ordinarily indicates sophisticated

means. Conduct such as hiding assets or transactions, or both,

through the use of fictitious entities, corporate shells, or offshore

financial accounts also ordinarily indicates sophisticated means.

U.S.S.G. § 2B1.1, App. n. 8(B). We review for clear error the finding and

imposition of a sophisticated means enhancement. United States v. Robertson, 493

F.3d 1322, 1329-30 (11th Cir. 2007).

The district court did not commit clear error by finding that a sophisticated

means enhancement should be imposed on Gonzales because he set up two shell

companies and falsified his employer's internal paperwork so that his employer

2
would ultimately wind up paying more than $185,000 to those companies. See id.

(upholding a sophisticated means enhancement for a defendant who used shell

entities to take advantage of his victim and switched entities every 30 days to avoid

detection). Accordingly, we hereby affirm the district court’s decision.

AFFIRMED.

3
EXHIBIT 32.2
  SECTION 1350
    CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
    (1)
    The Companys Annual Report on
    Form 10-K
    for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the
    Form 10-K)
    fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
    15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
    amended; and(2)
    The information contained in the
    Form 10-K
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and results of operations of the Company.  Dated: March 2, 2010

/s/  M.
    Michael OwensM.
    Michael OwensVice President and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 10.53

-----------------
TEXTRON FINANCIAL
-----------------
Asset Based Lending Group

                                               DAVID R. KNIGHT
                                               Senior Account Executive

                                               11575 Great Oaks Way    Ste 210
                                               Alpharetta, GA 30022-2426
                                               (770) 360-1641  Tel
                                               (770) 360-1672  Fax

                                               dknight@textronfinancial.com
                                               www.textronfinancial.com


August 13, 2003

Galaxy Nutritional Foods, Inc.
2441 Viscount Row
Orlando, FL 32809
Attn: Salvatore Furnari, CFC

     Re:  Waiver of Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio

Gentlemen:

     We refer to the Loan and  Security  Agreement  between  Galaxy  Nutritional
Foods, Inc. ("Borrower") and Textron Financial Corporation ("Lender"),  dated as
of May 27, 2003 (the  "Agreement").  All  capitalized  terms used in this letter
shall have the  meanings  assigned to them in the  Agreement,  unless  otherwise
defined in this letter.

     This letter confirms that Lender has waived the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio
for the quarter ended June 30, 2003,  and for the quarter  ending  September 30,
2003. This waiver is for each monthly period through September 2003. This letter
further confirms that Lender will review the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio for the
quarter ending December 31, 2003, based on the terms of the Agreement.

     This letter  further  confirms that from and after the date of this letter,
Lender will measure and test all of the financial covenants required of Borrower
under Section 7.6 of the Agreement on a quarterly rather than monthly basis.

     This  letter  further  confirms  Borrower's   understanding  that  Lender's
willingness to grant the aforementioned waivers shall not be deemed or construed
as a waiver of any terms,  conditions or covenants of the Agreement or the other
loan documents other than the above-referenced covenants, and such waivers shall
apply only to the  referenced  periods.  Furthermore,  such waivers shall not be
deemed an agreement or promise to grant any future or  additional  waivers shall
be earned by Lender upon the execution of this letter by Borrower and payable by
Borrower to Lender on the date thereof.

     If you have any questions, please feel free to call.

                                        Very truly yours,

                                        /s/ David R. Knight
                                        David R. Knight
                                        Senior Account Executive

Textron Financial is a subsidiary of Textron Inc.

<PAGE>


ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED TO:
Galaxy Nutritional Foods, Inc.


By: /s/ Salvatore J. Furnari
    ---------------------------------

Print Name: Salvatore J. Furnari
            -------------------------

Print Title: Chief Financial Officer
             ------------------------


Textron Financial is a subsidiary of Textron Inc.

<PAGE>
October 21, 2015

U. S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE,

West Building Ground Floor, Room

W12-140, Washington, DC 20590

Petition for Amendment to Add Aircraft to Spirit Vision Films, LLC’s. Exemption. 

(Exemption # 13215 in Docket No. FAA-2015-3200)

Dear Sir or Madam:

Spirit Vision Films, LLC. (Exemption # 13215 in Docket No. FAA-2015-3200) was

granted an exemption to conduct aerial videography and photography using the DJI Vision 2+ 

and DJI Aspire 1.

There is no request for additional relief from any further regulations. Spirit Vision Films, 

LLC. requests for an amendment to that exemption to add to its fleet the DJI Phantom 3

Professional. Granting this amendment would not affect safety but will benefit the public

because instead of dangerous helicopters being used, safer and quieter unmanned aircraft can

be used under the restrictions outlined in the previously granted exemption. Spirit Vision Films, 

LLC. agrees to operate under the same restrictions in the exemption.

The petitioner will operate under the restrictions listed in the manufacturer’s manual.

 Phantom 3 Professional User Manual (EN) v1.2 h tt p:/ /download.dji -

innovations.com/downloads/phantom_3/ en/P hantom _3_P rofessi

onal_User _Manu

al_v1.2_en.z ip

Spirit Vision Films, LLC. will operate only within the limitations in the previously

granted exemption and the limitations listed in the manuals. The limitations, from the

previously granted exemption, will be followed if there is a conflict with the manuals.
Since the DJI Phantom 3 Pro has been previously evaluated in other exemptions, (Exemption 

No. 11581A), it will not set any precedent; therefore, there is good cause to waive the publishing

of this petition in the Federal Register. 

Sincerely, 

Christopher Enges

Spirit Vision Films, LLC.

302 East Runnion Road

Sequim, WA 98382

360-460-8465
EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the  Quarterly  report  of ILX  Resorts  Incorporated  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending June 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I (We),
Joseph P. Martori,  Chief  Executive  Officer,  and Margaret M.  Eardley,  Chief
Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


/s/ Joseph P. Martori
----------------------------------
Joseph P. Martori
Chief Executive Officer
August 8, 2002


/s/ Margaret M. Eardley
----------------------------------
Margaret M. Eardley
Chief Financial Officer
August 8, 2002
No. 11-11092.

#### Nance *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.