12600 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 51 / Monday, March 17, 1997 / Notices

We calculated NV based on packed

F.O.B. Canadian cold storage prices to

unaffiliated customers, and made

deductions, where applicable, for home

market inland freight, pre-sale

warehouse expense, home market

packing costs, home market credit, and

home market commissions. When EP

was used as the United States price, in

accordance with section 773(a)(6) of the

Act, and sections 353.56 and 57 of the

Departments regulations, we made a

circumstance of sale adjustment for

credit, and commissions. In addition,

we added U.S. packing costs and made

an adjustment for differences in the

physical characteristics of the

merchandise. When CEP was used as

the United States price, we added U.S.

packing costs and made an adjustment

for differences in the physical

characteristics of the merchandise.

Level of Trade

As set forth in section 773(a)(1)(B)(i)

of the Act and in the Statement of

Administrative Action (SAA)

accompanying the Uruguay Round

Agreements Act, H.R. Doc. 316, Vol. 1,

103d Cong., at 829–831 (1994), to the

extent practicable, the Department will

calculate NV based on sales at the same

level of trade (LOT) as the U.S. sales.

Berryhill did not request an adjustment

for LOT. To ensure that no such

adjustment was necessary, we requested

and examined information on the

selling activities associated with each

phase of marketing in each of Berryhill’s

markets; since there were no differences

in such selling activities in either

market, and since all sales in both

markets were at a single LOT, we

compared sales at this sole LOT.

Preliminary Results of the Review

As a result of our comparison of EP

and CEP to NV, we preliminarily

determine that the following weightedaverage dumping margin exits:

Exporter/

processor Period Margin

Berryhill ..... 06/01/95–05/31/96 1.56

Interested parties may request

disclosure within 5 days of the date of

publication of this notice and may

request a hearing within 10 days of

publication. Any hearing, if requested,

will be held as early as convenient for

the parties but not later than 34 days

after the date of publication or the first

business day thereafter. Case briefs and/

or written comments from interested

parties may be submitted not later than

20 days after the date of publication of

this notice. Rebuttal briefs and rebuttal

comments, limited to issues raised in

the case briefs, may be filed no later

than 27 days after the date of

publication of this notice. The

Department will issue the final results

of this new shipper administrative

review, including the results of its

analysis of issues raised in any such

written comments, within 90 days of

issuance of these preliminary results.

Upon completion of this new shipper

review, the Department will issue

appraisement instructions directly to

the U.S. Customs Service. The results of

this review shall be the basis for the

assessment of antidumping duties on

entries of merchandise covered by the

determination and for future deposits of

estimated duties.

Furthermore, upon completion of this

review, the posting of a bond or security

in lieu of a cash deposit, pursuant to

section 751(a)(2)(B)(iii) of the Act and

section 353.22(h)(4) of the Department’s

interim regulations, will no longer be

permitted and, should the final results

yield a margin of dumping, a cash

deposit will be required for each entry

of the merchandise. The following

deposit requirements will be effective

upon publication of the final results of

this new shipper antidumping duty

administrative review for all shipments

of red raspberries from Canada

exported/processed by Berryhill,

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,

for consumption on or after the

publication date, as provided by section

751(a)(1) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit

rate for the reviewed company will be

that established in the final results of

this new shipper administrative review;

(2) for exporters not covered in these

reviews, but covered in previous

reviews or the original less-than-fairvalue (LTFV) investigation, the cash

deposit rate will continue to be the

company-specific rate published for the

most recent period; (3) if the exporter is

not a firm covered in this review,

previous reviews, or the original LTFV

investigation, but the manufacturer is,

the cash deposit rate will be that

established for the most recent period

for the manufacturer of the

merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit

rate for all other manufacturers or

exporters will continue to be 2.41

percent, the all others rate established in

the LTFV investigation (50 FR 19772,

May 10, 1985). These requirements,

when imposed, shall remain in effect

until publication of the final results of

the next administrative review.

This notice serves as a preliminary

reminder to importers of their

responsibility under 19 CFR 353.26 to

file a certificate regarding the

reimbursement of antidumping duties

prior to liquidation of the relevant

entries during this review period.

Failure to comply with this requirement

could result in the Secretary’s

presumption that reimbursement of

antidumping duties occurred and the

subsequent assessment of double

antidumping duties.

This new shipper administrative

review and this notice are in accordance

with section 751(a)(2)(B) of the Act (19

U.S.C. 1675(a)(2)(B)) and 19 CFR

353.22(h).

Dated: March 7, 1997.

Robert S. LaRussa,

Acting Assistant Secretary for Import

Administration.

[FR Doc. 97–6547 Filed 3–14–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–M

A–538–802

Shop Towels From Bangladesh; Final

Results of Antidumping Duty

Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of final results of

antidumping duty administrative

review.

SUMMARY: On December 10, 1996, the

Department of Commerce (the

Department) published the preliminary

results of its 1995–1996 administrative

review of the antidumping duty order

on shop towels from Bangladesh (61 FR

65025). The review covers four shop

towel producers that exported this

merchandise to the United States during

the period March 1, 1995, through

February 29, 1996. We gave interested

parties an opportunity to comment on

our preliminary results. We did not

receive any comments. Therefore, the

final results are the same as the

preliminary results.

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 17, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Matthew Rosenbaum, Kristie Strecker or

Kris Campbell, Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th

Street and Constitution Avenue,

Washington, D.C. 20230; telephone:

(202) 482–4733.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Applicable Statute

Unless otherwise indicated, all

citations to the Tariff Act of 1930, as

amended (the Act), are references to the

provisions effective January 1, 1995, the

effective date of the amendments made

to the Act by the Uruguay Round
Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 51 / Monday, March 17, 1997 / Notices 12601

Agreements Act (URAA). In addition,

unless otherwise indicated, all citations

to the Department’s regulations are to

the current regulations, as amended by

the interim regulations published in the

Federal Register on May 11, 1995 (60

FR 25130).

Background

On December 10, 1996, the

Department published in the Federal

Register the preliminary results of its

1995–1996 administrative review of the

antidumping duty order on shop towels

from Bangladesh (61 FR 65025). We

gave interested parties an opportunity to

comment on our preliminary results. We

did not receive any comments. There

was no request for a hearing. The

Department has conducted this review

in accordance with section 751 of the

Act.

Scope of Review

The product covered by this

administrative review is shop towels.

Shop towels are absorbent industrial

wiping cloths made from a loosely

woven fabric. The fabric may be either

100-percent cotton or a blend of

materials. Shop towels are currently

classifiable under item numbers

6307.10.2005 and 6307.10.2015 of the

Harmonized Tariff Schedules (HTS).

Although HTS subheadings are

provided for convenience and customs

purposes, our written description of the

scope of this proceeding remains

dispositive.

Final Results of Review

We determine that the following

percentage weighted-average margins

exist for the period March 1, 1995,

through February 29, 1996:

Manufacturer/exporter Margin

(percent)

Greyfab (Bangladesh) Ltd ........ 0.00

Hashem International ................ 0.00

Khaled Textile Mills Ltd ............ 0.00

Shabnam Textiles ..................... 0.00

The Department shall determine, and

the Customs Service shall assess,

antidumping duties on all appropriate

entries. The Department will issue

appraisement instructions on each

exporter directly to the Customs

Service.

Furthermore, the following deposit

requirements will be effective for all

shipments of the subject merchandise

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,

for consumption on or after the

publication date of these final results of

this administrative review, as provided

by section 751(a)(1) of the Act: (1) the

cash deposit rates for the reviewed

companies will be those rates

established above; (2) for previously

reviewed or investigated companies not

listed above, the cash deposit rate will

continue to be the company-specific rate

published for the most recent period; (3)

if the exporter is not a firm covered in

this review, a prior review, or the

original less-than-fair-value

investigation (LTFV), but the

manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate

will be the rate established for the most

recent period for the manufacturer of

the merchandise; and (4) if neither the

exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm

covered in this or any previous review

or the original investigation, the cash

deposit rate will be 4.60 percent, the

‘‘All Others’’ rate established in the

LTFV Final Determination (57 FR 3996).

These deposit requirements shall

remain in effect until publication of the

final results of the next administrative

review.

This notice also serves as a final

reminder to importers of their

responsibility under 19 CFR 353.26 to

file a certificate regarding the

reimbursement of antidumping duties

prior to liquidation of the relevant

entries during this review period.

Failure to comply with this requirement

could result in the Secretary’s

presumption that reimbursement of

antidumping duties occurred and the

subsequent assessment of double

antidumping duties.

This notice also serves as a reminder

to parties subject to administrative

protective orders (APOs) of their

responsibility concerning the

disposition of proprietary information

disclosed under APO in accordance

with 19 CFR 353.34(d)(1). Timely

written notification of the return/

destruction of APO materials or

conversion to judicial protective order is

hereby requested. Failure to comply

with the regulations and the terms of an

APO is a sanctionable violation.

This administrative review and notice

are in accordance with section 751(a)(1)

of the Tariff Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)(1))

and 19 CFR 353.22.

Dated: February 27, 1997.

Robert S. LaRussa,

Acting Assistant Secretary for Import

Administration.

[FR Doc. 97–6548 Filed 3–14–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

NATIONAL OCEANIC AND

ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION

Department of Interior

Fish and Wildlife Service

[I.D. 021497A]

Development of the Commencement

Bay Natural Resource Damage

Assessment Restoration Plan, Pierce

County, WA

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),

Commerce; and Fish and Wildlife

Service (FWS), Interior.

ACTION: Notice of availability of a

Restoration Plan and Final

Programmatic Environmental Impact

Statement (RP/FEIS).

SUMMARY: This notice advises the public

that the Restoration Plan and Final

Programmatic Environmental Impact

Statement (RP/FEIS) for the

Commencement Bay Natural Resource

Damage Assessment (CB/NRDA)

restoration planning process is available

for public review.

DATES: Written comments are requested

by April 16, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Written comments on the

RP/FEIS, requests for inclusion on the

RP/FEIS mailing list, and requests for

copies of any documents associated

with the RP/FEIS should be directed to:

Judy Lantor, U.S. Fish and Wildlife

Service, 3704 Griffin Lane SE., Suite

102, Olympia, WA 98501–2192, phone

(360) 753–6056/9440, or Dr. Robert

Clark Jr., NOAA/NMFS Restoration

Center NW, 7600 Sand Point Way NE.,

Seattle, WA 98115–0070, phone (206)

526–4338.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Judy

Lantor, FWS, phone (360) 753–6056/

9440, or Dr. Robert Clark Jr., NOAA/

NMFS, phone (206) 526–4338.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A notice

of availability (NOA) will be mailed to

all agencies, organizations, and

individuals who participated in the

scoping process or were identified

during the RP/EIS process. Copies of the

RP/FEIS have been sent to all

participants who have already requested

copies.

A. Background

A Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare

the RP/EIS was published in the Federal

Register (59 FR 44711–2, August 30,

1994). Formal and informal scoping

meetings were held to provide the