# C_2022424EN.01004201.xml

| 7.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 424/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 424/42

---

Action brought on 2 September 2022 — VP v Cedefop

(Case T-563/22)

(2022/C 424/54)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: VP (represented by: L. Levi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the defendant’s decision of 17 December 2021 not to implement sections (1) and (2) of the operational part of the judgment of the GCEU, of 16 December 2020, in case T-187/18, VP v Cedefop; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the defendant’s decision of 17 December 2021 not to implement sections (1) and (2) of the operational part of the judgment of the GCEU, of 16 December 2020, in case T-187/18, VP v Cedefop;

| — | annul the connected decision not to renew the applicant’s employment contract for an indefinite period with effect from 16 November 2017; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the connected decision not to renew the applicant’s employment contract for an indefinite period with effect from 16 November 2017;

| — | annul the decision of 17 June 2022 of the defendant rejecting the complaint of the applicant of 3 March 2022 against the decision of 17 December 2021; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of 17 June 2022 of the defendant rejecting the complaint of the applicant of 3 March 2022 against the decision of 17 December 2021;

| — | order the compensation of the moral prejudice suffered by the applicant evaluated ex aequo et bono to one hundred thousand Euros; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the compensation of the moral prejudice suffered by the applicant evaluated ex aequo et bono to one hundred thousand Euros;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging that the defendant’s decision not to implement the core sections (1) and (2) of the judgment of 16 December 2020 in case T-187/18, VP v Cedefop and, consequently, not to renew the employment contract of the applicant is vitiated by a breach of the obligation pursuant to Article 266 TFEU to comply with the Judgment in Case T-187/18 of 16 December 2020 and a manifest error of assessment. |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging that the defendant’s decision not to implement the core sections (1) and (2) of the judgment of 16 December 2020 in case T-187/18, VP v Cedefop and, consequently, not to renew the employment contract of the applicant is vitiated by a breach of the obligation pursuant to Article 266 TFEU to comply with the Judgment in Case T-187/18 of 16 December 2020 and a manifest error of assessment.

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging that the defendant failed its obligation to duty of care. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging that the defendant failed its obligation to duty of care.

| 3. | Third plea in law, alleging that the defendant infringed the principles of equal treatment and protection of legitimate expectations. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Third plea in law, alleging that the defendant infringed the principles of equal treatment and protection of legitimate expectations.

| 4. | Fourth plea in law, alleging that the defendant misused its power. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Fourth plea in law, alleging that the defendant misused its power.

---