alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32(b)








This
Certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise
subject to the liability of that section.  This Certification shall
not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other
document pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, except as otherwise stated in
such filing.








Certification
Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63


of Title
18 of the United States Code








In
connection with the Annual Report of Public Service Company of Oklahoma (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K (the “Report”) for the year ended December 31, 2008 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Holly
Keller Koeppel, the chief financial officer of the Company certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 that, based on my knowledge (i) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.








/s/ Holly Keller
Koeppel_____________


Holly
Keller Koeppel


Chief
Financial Officer








February 27,
2009








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
American Electric Power Company, Inc. and will be retained by American Electric
Power Company, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
# C_2022294EN.01004201.xml

| 1.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/42

---

Action brought on 16 June 2022 — Das Neves v Commission

(Case T-357/22)

(2022/C 294/58)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: José das Neves (La Hulpe, Belgium) (represented by: J.-P. Vandersteen, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

| — | annul the decision of 12 October 2021 taken against him by the [confidential] (1); |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of 12 October 2021 taken against him by the [confidential] (1);

| — | order the defendant to pay him the amount of EUR 20 000 by way of compensation for the financial and non-material damage suffered; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay him the amount of EUR 20 000 by way of compensation for the financial and non-material damage suffered;

| — | order the defendant to pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay all the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of his action against the decision of the Commission of 12 October 2021 issuing him with a warning, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging a manifest error of assessment of a conflict of interest. |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging a manifest error of assessment of a conflict of interest.

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging a misuse of power. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging a misuse of power.

| 3. | Third plea in law, alleging infringement of the rights of the defence. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Third plea in law, alleging infringement of the rights of the defence.

| 4. | Fourth plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 21 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Fourth plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 21 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union.

---

(1)  Confidential information omitted.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
consolidated financial statements of Ceramics Process Systems Corporation
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-Q for period
ending April 1, 2000.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          Dec-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               Apr-01-2000
<CASH>                                       1,301,480
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  526,662
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    452,484
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,323,879
<PP&E>                                       1,068,891
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,259,257
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,392,770
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          473,533
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    12,286,969
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,392,770
<SALES>                                      1,354,459
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,354,459
<CGS>                                        1,027,710
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,260,521
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                108,901
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            108,901
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   108,901
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01


</TABLE>
No. 11-10800.

#### Swank *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
```

[Federal Register: October 27, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 207)]
[Notices]               
[Page 66074]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr27oc10-40]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

 
Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Friday, November 19, 2010.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance and enforcement matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-27326 Filed 10-25-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```
No. 11-10784.

#### Raisley *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-10560.

#### Tilton *v.*MacDonald, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.1


            Certification of Chief Executive and Financial Officer of
               Monument Resources, Inc. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350


     I, A.G. Foust, certify that:

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Monument
Resources, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
A.G. Foust, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


August 12, 2004                             By:  /s/  A.G. Foust
                                               --------------------------------
                                                      A.G. Foust
                                                      Chief Executive and
                                                      Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                    Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of NHT, Inc., General Partner for National
Housing Trust Limited Partnership (the "Company:") hereby certifies, to such
officer's knowledge, that:

         (i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for
the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: November 19, 2003       By  /s/ Susan E. Basting
                                  --------------------
                                   Susan E. Basting, Treasurer
                                   and Chief Financial Officer
                                   NHT, Inc., General Partner for
                                   National Housing Trust Limited Partnership

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.
# United States Court of Appeals **For the Eighth Circuit**

___________________________ No. 12-1614

___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v. Robert Page lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis

____________ Submitted: November 15, 2012 Filed: December 12, 2012 [Unpublished]

____________ Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. Robert Page pleaded guilty to conspi ring to commit credit card fraud, 18 U.S.C. §§ 371, 1029(a)(2). The District Court 1 sentenced Page to sixty months in prison, an

1 The Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.upward variance from the U.S. Sentencing Guid elines range of twenty-four to thirty months, and ordered the sentence to be se rved consecutively to an unrelated state prison term. The court also ordered $38,580. 23 in restitution, with a co-conspirator jointly and severally liable for the payment. On appeal, Page’s counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that Page’s sentence is unreasonable, that the prison term should have run concurrently with the state sentence, a nd that the restitution amount should not have included certain losses from conduct that occurred in New York. We conclude that the District Court pr operly considered the sentencing factors and that the sentence is not unreasonable. SeeUnited States v. Farmer , 647 F.3d 1175, 1178–79 (8th Cir. 2011) (standardof review), cert. denied , 133 S. Ct. 130 (2012); United States v. Mangum , 625 F.3d 466, 470 (8th Ci r. 2010) (explaining that an upward-variance sentence is reasonable where the court makes an individualized assessment of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) fact ors, based on the facts presented, and considers the defendant’s proffered information); see also United States v. Becker , 636 F.3d 402, 408 (8th Cir. 2011) (noting th at a sentencing court does not abuse its discretion in imposing a consecutive sentence where it has considered the § 3553(a) factors). As to restitution, the plea agreement st ated that restitution would include the amount of loss agreed to by the parties, and the parties specifically agreed to $38,580.23 at the sentencing hearing. See18 U.S.C. § 3663A(a)(3); see also United States v. Nguyen , 46 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir. 1995) (“ A defendant who explicitly and voluntarily exposes himself to a specific sentence may not challenge that punishment on appeal.”). Having reviewed the record i ndependently under Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. We therefore affirm the judgment of the District Court and grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

______________________________
-2-
COURT OF APPEALS

Thirteenth District

Corpus Christi – Edinburg, Texas

Below is the JUDGMENT in the numbered cause set out herein to be Filed and 

Entered in the Minutes of the Court of Appeals, Thirteenth District of Texas, at Corpus 

Christi – Edinburg, as of the 4th day of October, 2013. If this Judgment does not 

conform to the opinion handed down by the Court in this cause, any party may file a 

Motion for Correction of Judgment with the Clerk of this Court.

CAUSE NO. 13-12-00622-CV (Tr.Ct.No. C-1529-08-I)

MALCOM G. DYER, Appellant,

v.

HIDALGO COUNTY, TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal to this Court from Hidalgo County, Texas.



JUDGMENT

On appeal from the 398th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, from an order signed 

August 31, 2012. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Gregory T. Perkes.

THIS CAUSE was submitted to the Court on March 28, 2013, on oral argument, the 

record and briefs. These having been examined and fully considered, it is the opinion of 

the Court that there was no error in the judgment of the court below, and said judgment 

is hereby AFFIRMED against appellant, MALCOLM G. DYER.

Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant, MALCOLM G. DYER. It is further 

ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.



DORIAN E. RAMIREZ, CLERK
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 Certification Pursuant To Section 1350 Of Chapter 63 Of 18 U.S.C.
As Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002/SEC Rule 13a-14(b)
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated: August 18, 2006
    /s/ Michael K. GreenMichael K. GreenChief Operating Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 48 (Wednesday, March 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 11422]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6120]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket Nos. RP97-20-003, and RP97-194-001]


El Paso Natural Gas Company; Notice of Request for Waiver and 
Technical Conference

March 6, 1997.
    Take notice that on March 3, 1997, El Paso Natural Gas Company (El 
Paso) submitted a request for waiver of Order Nos. 587, et seq., and 
ordering paragraph (B) of the Commission's order issued February 13, 
1997 in these proceedings to permit El Paso to delay implementation of 
the Gas Industry Standards Board Standards from April 1, 1997 until 
June 1, 1997.
    El Paso also requested that the Commission Staff convene a 
technical conference as soon as possible pursuant to the February 13, 
1997 order to discuss the application of the GISB Standards on El 
Paso's system and the process for monitoring the resulting impacts on 
the scheduling system and related procedures. Due to the technical 
nature of this discussion, El Paso requests that parties' 
representatives attending the conference be experienced with the 
scheduling process and computer system design.
    El Paso states that copies of the filing were served upon all 
parties of record at Docket Nos. RP97-20-000, et seq., and RP97-194-
000.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests should be filed 
on or before March 13, 1997. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this 
filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public 
inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-6120 Filed 3-11-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 7 (Friday, January 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 1460]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-654]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Agency for Health Care Policy and Research


Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (5 U.S.C., Appendix 2) announcement is made of the following 
special emphasis panel scheduled to meet during the month of February 
1997:

    Name: Health Care Policy and Research Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date and Time: February 7, 1997, 8:00 a.m.
    Place: Doubletree Hotel, 1750 Rockville Pike, Halpine Room, 
Rockville, Maryland 20852.
    Open February 7, 1997, 8:00 a.m. to 8:15 a.m. Closed for 
remainder of meeting.
    Purpose: This Panel is charged with conducting the initial 
review of grant applications requesting dissertation support for 
health services research undertaken as part of an academic program 
to qualify for a doctorate.
    Agenda: The open session of the meeting on February 7 from 8:00 
a.m. to 8:15 a.m., will be devoted to a business meeting covering 
administration matters. During the closed session, the panel will be 
reviewing and discussing grant applications dealing with health 
services research issues. In accordance with the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act, section 10(d) of 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2 and 5 U.S.C., 
552b(c)(6), the Administrator, AHCPR, has made a formal 
determination that this latter session will be closed because the 
discussions are likely to reveal personal information concerning 
individuals associated with the grant applications. This information 
is exempt from mandatory disclosure.
    Anyone wishing to obtain a roster of members or other relevant 
information should contact Carmen Johnson, Agency for Health Care 
Policy and Research, Suite 400, 2101 East Jefferson Street, 
Rockville, Maryland 20852, Telephone (301) 594-1449 x1613.
    Agenda items for this meeting are subject to change as 
priorities dictate.

    Dated: January 3, 1997.
Clifton R. Gaus,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 97-654 Filed 1-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-90-M
# C_2023296EN.01000701.xml

| 21.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 296/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 296/7

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 July 2023 — RQ v Council of the European Union, European Commission

(Case C-7/22 P) (1)

(Appeal - Actions for damages - Economic and monetary policy - Restructuring of Greek public debt - Private sector involvement - Damage caused by a reduction in the nominal value of newly issued State bonds compared with the value of cancelled bonds - Statements by the heads of State or Government of the euro zone and the institutions of the European Union - Decisions of the Euro Group - Informal and intergovernmental nature of the Euro Group - Non-contractual liability of the European Union - Possibility of attributing damage)

(2023/C 296/06)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: RQ (represented by: M. Meng-Papantoni and H. Tagaras, dikigoroi)

Other parties to the proceedings: Council of the European Union (represented by: J. Bauerschmidt, K. Pavlaki and A. Westerhof Löfflerová, acting as Agents), European Commission (represented by: T. Adamopoulos and S. Delaude, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders RQ to bear her own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union and the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders RQ to bear her own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union and the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 119, 14.3.2022.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                                      5
<LEGEND>
(Replace this text with legend, if applicable)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                                 0000818084
<NAME>                           BROWN-BENCHMARK PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
<MULTIPLIER>                                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                          U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                        JAN-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                         MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                1
<CASH>                                                   876,136
<SECURITIES>                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             80,752
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       1,100,462
<PP&E>                                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        16,889,771
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    492,551
<BONDS>                                               14,500,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          16,889,771
<SALES>                                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         957,298
<CGS>                                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         646,172
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       314,569
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           (3,443)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       (3,443)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                              (3,443)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                              0.000
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              0.000
        


</TABLE>