alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 19, 2017

jam 

# Order

Clerk July 19, 2017

1 56137 ( 22 )

TONY J. HENRY

,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 1 56137

COA: 338237

IONIA CORRECTIONAL FACILITY

WARDEN

,

Defendant

- Appellee.

___________________________________

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion to waive fees is considered and it

is DENIED because MCL 600.2963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be

liable for filin g fees.

Within 21 days of the certification of this order, plaintiff shall pay to the

Clerk of the Court the initial partial filing fee of $ 131 .00, shall submit a copy of this

order with the payment, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is b eing

returned with this order. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the appeal not

being filed in this Court.

If plaintiff timely files the partial fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly

payments shall be made to the Department of Correctio ns in an amount of 50 percent of

the deposits made to plaintiff’s account until the payments equal the balance due of

$ 244 .00. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court.

Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) plaintiff shall not file further appeals in civi l

actions in this Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full.

The Clerk of the Court shall furnish two copies of this order to plaintiff and

return plaintiff’s pleadings with this order.
<PAGE>   1

                                   EXHIBIT 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


Parent

Ramapo Financial Corporation
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                 STATE OR OTHER
                                                 JURISDICTION OF    PERCENTAGE
SUBSIDIARIES(1)                                   INCORPORATION      OWNERSHIP
---------------                                   -------------      ---------
                                                 <C>                <C> 
The Ramapo Bank(2)                                 New Jersey          100%
RFC High Ridge, Inc.                               New Jersey          100%
RFC Harmony Park, Inc.                             New Jersey          100%
RFC National, Inc.                                 New Jersey          100%
RFC Center Plaza, Inc.                             New Jersey          100%
RFC High Debi Hills, Inc.                          New Jersey          100%
RFC Jefferson, Inc.                                New Jersey          100%
RFC Deer Trail Development, Inc.                   New Jersey          100%
Ramapo Investment Corporation                      New Jersey          100%
Bancorps' International Trading Corporation(2)     New Jersey          33.3%
</TABLE>

----------------------

(1)      Except for Bancorps' International Trading Corporation, which is
         accounted for using the equity method of accounting, the assets,
         liabilities and operations of the subsidiaries are included in the
         consolidated financial statements contained in Item 8 hereof. Unless
         otherwise indicated, all subsidiaries are subsidiaries of the Bank.

(2)      Subsidiary of the Corporation.



                                      72
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-01-1997
<CASH>                                              16
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,203
<ALLOWANCES>                                       226
<INVENTORY>                                     37,103
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                49,892
<PP&E>                                          27,571
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,685
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  70,311
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,851
<BONDS>                                         21,291
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,745
<OTHER-SE>                                      36,002
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    70,311
<SALES>                                         87,214
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                87,214
<CGS>                                           59,696
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   59,696
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                27,287
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 708
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (477)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (191)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (286)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (286)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
J

~~ jEO srq T

~

s UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY o 

# ~ Q WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

## 2 =

0 C PROZ

~ G

~ \ 

### JUL 2 5 20i2

Mr. J. R. Stroble Manager, National TRiJ Program Carlsbad Field Office U.S. Department of Energy P.O. Box 3090 Carlsbad, NM 88221-3090 Dear Mr. Stroble: OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION

On March 28, 2012, the Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO) requested, as a Tier 1(Tl ) change, that the t1.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) approve the addition of Lot 2 waste to the remote-handled (RH) transuranic (TRU) waste stream, ID-ANLE-S5000 from the Idaho National Laboratory (INL). ']'he Lot 2 wastes are divided into high-gamma TRU waste, including irradiated fuel pin test specimens and scraps, and trash debris associated with the processing of the high-gamma TRLI waste. EPA has reviewed the information provided and approves the addition of the waste to the above waste stream and, as a result, INL-CCP may dispose of this waste at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPI'). This approval also allows future addition of waste to this stream with a waste pedigree (radiological and physical contents) similar to the waste approved in this letter and as detailed in the report. The enclosed report (EPA Docket No. A-98-49; II-A4-163) supports EPA's approval. This report also discusses changes to specific INL-CCP documents using the term "freeze file." As discussed in previous EPA reports, CCP may be required to revise a document as a result of an inspection-related EPA issue. Once CCP makes the required changes, the modified document is provided to EPA as a freeze file to serve as objective evidence that the changes are appropriate. EPA has agreed to accept a modified document as a freeze file to expedite review while CCP's document control process generates the official version of the revised document and provides it at a later date. On occasion, EPA has not received controlled versions of revised documents in a timely manner. Therefore. EPA must receive CCP's controlled version of all revised documents no later than the end of the calendar quarter, in this case, September 30, 2012.

Intemet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov Recycled/Recyclable • Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper

### If you have any questions regarding this approval, please contact Rajani Joglekar at (202) 343-9462 or Ed Feltcorn at (202) 343-9422.
Sincerely,



### t ~ 

# ~ Tom Peake, Director Center for Waste Management and Regulations Enclosure

cc: Electronic Distribution Christine Gelles, DOE EM Alton Harris, DOE EM Joe Franco, CBFO Marcus Pinzel, CBFO NTP Courtland Fesmire, CBFO QA Jerry Wells, DOE ID D K Ploetz, WTS-CCP Irene Quintana, CCP Site Documents Tim Hall, NMED
<PAGE>
 
                                                                Exhibit 10(g)(5)

                   AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN
             DELWIN D. HOCK AND PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO


   THIS AMENDMENT is made, entered into and is effective as of this 22nd day of
August, 1995, by and between Public Service Company of Colorado, a Colorado
corporation (the "Company"), and Delwin D. Hock (the "Executive"). The
Employment Agreement between Company and Executive (the "Agreement") executed
on April 8, 1994, is amended as follows:

     1. Section 7.6 is deleted in its entirety and rewritten to read as follows:

        "7.6 TERMINATION AFTER ANNOUNCEMENT OR CHANGE IN CONTROL. In connection
        with a Change in Control (as defined in the Severance Agreement), during
        the Coverage Period (as defined in Section 3.a of the Severance
        Agreement) the Executive shall be entitled to the greater of (a) the
        payments he would otherwise be entitled to receive for the remaining
        term of this Agreement; or (b) those payments provided under the
        Severance Agreement. If it is determined that payments will be made
        pursuant to this Agreement in connection with a Change in Control, the
        Executive shall be entitled to tax-free reimbursements of any excise
        taxes that may arise as a result of such payments."

    2.  The following language shall be added to the Agreement as Section 7.7:
<PAGE>
 
        "7.7 EMPLOYMENT BY PARENT. The Executive's termination of employment
        with the Company to become an employee of a corporation which owns 100%
        of the Company shall not be considered a termination of employment for
        purposes of this Agreement. The subsequent termination of Executive's
        employment from such corporation shall be considered a termination of
        employment for purposes of this Agreement."


                                              PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO



         /s/ Wayne H. Brunetti  
By:__________________________________

                         EXECUTIVE


          /s/ Delwin D. Hock
By:__________________________________
            Delwin D. Hock
# C_2021278EN.01006101.xml

| 12.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 278/61 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 278/61

---

Action brought on 20 May 2021 — Daimler v EUIPO (Representation of three-pronged elements on a black background III)

(Case T-280/21)

(2021/C 278/83)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Daimler AG (Stuttgart, Germany) (represented by: N. Siebertz, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: Application for EU figurative mark (Representation of three-pronged elements on a black background III) — Application for registration No 18 206 085

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 March 2021 in Case R 1897/2020-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings and those incurred in the appeal proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings and those incurred in the appeal proceedings.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3





                              September 25, 1997


Board of Directors
U.S. Legal Support, Inc.
1001 Fannin, Suite 650
Houston, Texas  77002

Gentlemen:

        It is my understanding that the Prospectus forming a part of the 
Registration Statement on Form S-1 which U.S. Legal Support, Inc. (the 
"Company") is filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection 
with the proposed initial public offering of shares of Common Stock of the 
Company, will state that I will become a director of the Company upon completion
of the public offering.  I hereby consent to such statement, to such use of my 
name and to the filing of this letter as an exhibit to the Registration 
Statement. 

                                                Very truly yours,


                                                /s/ Fentress Bracewell
                                                ------------------------
                                                Fentress Bracewell
No. 11-9976.

#### McCarthy *v.*Sosnick et al. (two judgments).

Sup. Ct. Mich. Certiorari denied.
# C_2022266EN.01001401.xml

| 11.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 266/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 266/14

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský soud v Brně (Czech Republic) lodged on 14 April 2022 — CD v Ministerstvo vnitra České republiky, Odbor azylové a migrační politiky

(Case C-257/22)

(2022/C 266/17)

Language of the case: Czech

Referring court

Krajský soud v Brně

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: CD

Defendant: Ministerstvo vnitra České republiky, Odbor azylové a migrační politiky

Question referred

Should Article 4(2) and (3) and Article 5 in fine of Directive 2008/115/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals in conjunction with Article 2, Article 4, and Article 19(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union be interpreted as precluding the application, in assessing whether a return decision under Article 6 of Directive 2008/115/EC leads to a breach of the non-refoulement principle, of the concept of a safe country of origin under Articles 36 and 37 of Directive 2013/32/EU (2) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection, in combination with the narrowed definition of the non-refoulement principle focused solely on the prohibition of ill treatment under Article 4 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and Article 3 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms?

---

(1)  OJ 2008 L 348, p. 98.

(2)  OJ 2013 L 180, p. 60.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 11


                  LILLIAN VERNON CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

        COMPUTATION OF LOSS PER SHARE ASSUMING PRIMARY AND FULL DILUTION
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                   MAY 24, 1997                    MAY 25, 1996
                                           ----------------------------    ----------------------------
                                            PRIMARY      FULLY DILUTED      PRIMARY      FULLY DILUTED
                                           ---------    ---------------    ---------    ---------------
<S>                                         <C>             <C>             <C>              <C>  
Net loss                                    ($2,345)        ($2,345)        ($3,631)         ($3,631)
                                           ---------    ---------------    ---------    ---------------
Common Shares:

  Average number of shares outstanding        9,610           9,610           9,617            9,617
  Assumed exercise of stock options              43             114              22               30
                                           ---------    ---------------    ---------    ---------------
                                              9,653           9,724           9,639            9,647
                                           ---------    ---------------    ---------    ---------------
Loss Per Share                                ($.24)          ($.24)          ($.38)           ($.38)
                                           ---------    ---------------    ---------    ---------------
</TABLE>

                                 Page 11 of 11
Exhibit
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of Puget Energy, Inc. and Puget Sound Energy,
Inc. (the “Companies”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form
10-K”), I, Stephen P.
Reynolds, thePresident and Chief Executive Officer of the Companies, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:
  (1)
              The
      Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
  (2)
              The
      information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Companies.
 
 
 
 Date:  March
      3, 2009/s/Stephen
      P. ReynoldsStephen
      P. ReynoldsPresident
      and Chief Executive
Officer
No. 11-431.

#### Rubin et al. *v.*Islamic Republic of Iran et al.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Scalia and Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
EXHIBIT 32.1



     CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350


I, Bruce M. Goldberg, President and Chief Executive Officer of All American
Semiconductor, Inc., hereby certify, to my knowledge:

         (1)      that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of All American
                  Semiconductor, Inc. for the quarterly period ended on March
                  31, 2006 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
                  the date hereof at File No. 0-16207 (the "Report") fully
                  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
                  applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      that the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                  in all material respects, the financial condition and results
                  of operations of All American Semiconductor, Inc.

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.




Date:  May 22, 2006                        /s/ BRUCE M. GOLDBERG
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Bruce M. Goldberg
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
No. 11-10334.

#### Williams *v.*California et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# C_2023286EN.01001301.xml

| 14.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 286/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 286/13

---

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 18 April 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from Curtea de Apel Alba Iulia — Romania) — Vantage Logistics SRL v Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Alba, Auto Help Alba SRL, Banca Transilvania SA, BRD — Groupe Société Générale SA, SC Croma SRL, SC Polaris M.Holding, SC Elit România Piese Auto Originale SRL

(Case C-200/22, (1) Vantage Logistics)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Judicial cooperation in civil matters - Insolvency proceedings - Restructuring plan - Directive (EU) 2019/1023 - Applicability ratione temporis and ratione materiae - Article 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court)

(2023/C 286/14)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Curtea de Apel Alba Iulia

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Vantage Logistics SRL

Defendants: Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Alba, Auto Help Alba SRL, Banca Transilvania SA, BRD — Groupe Société Générale SA, SC Croma SRL, SC Polaris M.Holding, SC Elit România Piese Auto Originale SRL

Interveners: SC Nedo Auto Service SRL, CH Insolvency IPURL, acting as insolvency administrator for SC Nedo Auto Service SRL

Operative part of the order

The Court of Justice of the European Union clearly lacks jurisdiction to answer the question referred for a preliminary ruling by the Curtea de Apel Alba Iulia (Court of Appeal, Alba Iulia, Romania), by the decision of 22 February 2022.

---

(1)  OJ C 222, 7.6.2022.

---
# C_2022424EN.01002701.xml

| 7.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 424/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 424/27

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht (Germany) lodged on 3 August 2022 — J.M.P. v AP Assistenzprofis GmbH

(Case C-518/22)

(2022/C 424/35)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesarbeitsgericht

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant and appellant on a point of law: J.M.P.

Defendant and respondent in the appeal on a point of law: AP Assistenzprofis GmbH

Question referred

Can Article 4(1), Article 6(1), Article 7 and/or Article 2(5) of Directive 2000/78/EC, (1) read in the light of the requirements of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and of Article 19 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, be interpreted as meaning that, in a situation such as that in the main proceedings, direct discrimination on grounds of age can be justified?

---

(1)  Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation (OJ 2000 L 303, p. 16).

---
No. 11-10410.

#### Gary *v.*Florida.

Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.
#### COM. v. DAVIS, F.

143 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/13/2017

CP-51-CR-0004776-2013

(Philadelphia)

Affirmed