alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 7 (Friday, January 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 1465]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-636]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Notice of 
Meeting

    Pursuant to Pub. L. 92-463, notice is hereby given of a meeting of 
the National Advisory Council on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism on 
February 13, 1997.
    The meeting will be open to the public, as noted below, to discuss 
Institute programs and other issues relating to committee activities as 
indicated in the notice. Attendance by the public will be limited to 
space available. Individuals who plan to attend and need special 
assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable 
accommodations, should contact Ms. Ida Nestorio at 301-443-4376.
    The meeting will be closed to the public as indicated below in 
accordance with the provisions set forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 
552b(c)(6) of Title 5, U.S.C. and sec. 10(d) of Public Law 92-463 for 
the review, discussion and evaluation of individual research grant 
applications. These applications and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material, and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and programs, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
    A summary of the meeting and the roster of committee members may be 
obtained from: Ms. Ida Nestorio, Office of Scientific Affairs, National 
Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Willco Building, Suite 409, 
6000 Executive Blvd., Rockville, MD 20892-7003, Telephone: 301-443-
4376. Other information pertaining to the meeting may be obtained from 
the contact person indicated.

    Name of Committee: National Advisory Council on Alcohol Abuse 
and Alcoholism.
    Executive Secretary: James F. Vaughan, 6000 Executive Blvd., 
Suite 409, Bethesda, MD 20892-7003, 301-443-4375.
    Date of Meeting: February 13, 1997.
    Place of Meeting: Conference Room E1 & E2, Building 45 
(Natcher), NIH Campus, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Closed: February 13, 1997--8:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Open: February 13, 1997--10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: Discussion of Institute extramural research programs, 
and other program and peer review issues relevant to Council 
activities.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.271, Alcohol 
Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and Clinicians; 
93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for Research 
Training; 93.891, Alcohol Research Center Grants; National 
Institutes of Health)

    Dated: January 6, 1997.
Paula N. Hayes,
Acting Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-636 Filed 1-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Guidelines for Particulate Matter (PM) Emissions Calculations 

for Spray Coating Operations

The following methodology should be used to calculate PM emissions from coating 

operations and report using Form B4:

EPM = Q x S x (1 - TE) x (1 - CE) Eq. (1)

where:

EPM = Emissions of particulate matter (lbs)

Q = Quantity of coatings applied (gallons or pounds)

S (1) = Solid content (lb/gal or lb/lb) in coatings

TE (2) = Transfer Efficiency (decimal)

CE 

(3) = Control System Efficiency (decimal)

(1) User may refer to the product Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) or Product Data Sheet 

to determine the solid content (S) of a coating. This content can be either in terms of 

percentage (weight fraction or lb/lb) or factor (lb/gal). In the absence of any coating 

specific data, the following default factors can be used for calculation purposes.

SOLID PERCENTAGE: 37.5 % or 0.375 lb/lb

SOLID FACTOR: 3.0 lb/gal

NOTE: Unit of S must be consistent with that of coatings applied (Q), i.e., S in weight 

fraction or lb/lb for Q in pounds and S in lb/gal for Q in gallons.

(2) User may refer to the Equipment Technical Specification Data to determine the 

transfer efficiency (TE) of coating equipment. In the absence of any specific 

equipment technical data and depending on type of coating operation, the following 

default TE can be used.

SPRAY TE = 0.65
2

OTHERS TE = 1.00

NOTE: Other coating operations include flow, roller, and dip coating 

(3) If coating is performed inside a spraybooth which is equipped with a filter system 

to control PM emissions, the following control efficiency (CE) can be used 

depending on the type of filter:

CONVENTIONAL FILTERS: CE = 0.90

3-STAGE AEROSPACE NESHAP-COMPLAINT FILTERS: CE = 0.95

HIGH EFFICIENCY PARTICLE ARRESTOR (HEPA): CE = 0.9997

Instructions for Reporting PM on Forms B4 and B4U

a) Enter the total quantity of the coatings (Q) used during the reporting period (annual 

throughput). Identify the correct throughput unit. If needed, convert Q from 

gallons to pounds by multiplying Q (in gallons) by the coating density (lb/gal). 

b) From coating MSDS or Product Data Sheet, find solid content (S). If data is not 

available, a default factor can be used. Unit of S must be consistent with that of 

coatings applied (Q), i.e., S in weight fraction or lb/lb for Q in pounds and S in 

lb/gal for Q in gallons.

c) Determine the applicable control efficiency (CE = 0.90, 0.95, 0.9997, or 0.0 if 

coating is performed outside the spraybooth). Substantiate with documentation for 

the use of HEPA filter efficiency. 

d) Calculate and record PM emission factor by multiply solid content (S) by one 

minus transfer efficiency (1-TE) and then by one minus control system efficiency 

(1-CE).

e) PM emissions (in pounds) are calculated by the program by multiply throughputs 

Q by emission factor (step d).

SPECIAL NOTE: This methodology is also applicable in calculating toxic PM 

emissions, i.e., Hexavalent Chromium and Lead from coating operations, by replacing 

the solid content with toxic metal content in Equation (1).
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 925 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 925

 To extend the authorization of appropriations for allocation to carry 
 out approved wetlands conservation projects under the North American 
          Wetlands Conservation Act through fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 30, 2019

Mr. Thompson of California (for himself and Mr. Wittman) introduced the 
    following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural 
                               Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the authorization of appropriations for allocation to carry 
 out approved wetlands conservation projects under the North American 
          Wetlands Conservation Act through fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``North American Wetlands Conservation 
Extension Act''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    Section 7(c) of the North American Wetlands Conservation Act (16 
U.S.C. 4406(c)) is amended by striking ``not to exceed--'' and all that 
follows through paragraph (5) and inserting ``not to exceed $60,000,000 
for each of fiscal years 2020 through 2024.''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 19 (Wednesday, January 29, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 4799]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-01696]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart B 
(Formerly Subpart Q) During the Week Ending January 18, 2014

    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience 
and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart 
B (formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural 
Regulations (See 14 CFR 301.201 et. seq.). The due date for Answers, 
Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below 
for each application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the 
application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the 
adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate 
cases a final order without further proceedings.

    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2014-0005.
    Date Filed: January 15, 2014.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: February 5, 2014.
    Description: Application of Heron Luftfahrt GmbH & Co. KG 
requesting a foreign air carrier permit and exemption authority to 
operate charter flights with passengers and property to/from the United 
States.

    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2014-0007.
    Date Filed: January 16, 2014.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: February 6, 2014.
    Description: Application of Lineas Aereas Suramericanas, S.A. 
(``LAS'') requesting a foreign air carrier permit and renewal of 
exemption authority authorizing LAS to operate the following services 
pursuant to the Open Skies Air Transport Agreement between the 
Governments of the United States of Colombia: (i) foreign air 
transportation of property and mail from points behind Colombia via 
Colombia and intermediate points to any point or points in the United 
States and beyond; and (ii) other charters.

Barbara J. Hairston,
Supervisory Dockets Officer Docket Operations, Federal Register 
Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2014-01696 Filed 1-28-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
```
EXHIBIT 11

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                           RECOVERY ENGINEERING, INC.

                          COMPUTATION OF LOSS PER SHARE

                                                      Three months ended                Nine months ended
                                                         September 30,                     September 30,
                                                  ---------------------------      ----------------------------
                                                     1996             1995             1996            1995
                                                     ----             ----             ----            ----
Primary:
<S>                                              <C>              <C>              <C>              <C>      
   Weighted average shares outstanding             4,323,000        4,250,000        4,301,000        4,234,000

   Net effect of dilutive stock options and
      warrants ) based on treasury stock
      method using average market price                 --               --               --               --
                                                 -----------      -----------      -----------      -----------


   Total                                           4,323,000        4,250,000        4,301,000        4,234,000
                                                 ===========      ===========      ===========      ===========

   Net loss                                      $(2,916,000)     $   (85,000)     $(6,559,000)     $  (713,000)
                                                 ===========      ===========      ===========      ===========

   Per share amount                              $      (.67)     $      (.02)     $     (1.52)     $      (.17)
                                                 ===========      ===========      ===========      ===========

Fully diluted:

   Weighted average shares outstanding             4,323,000        4,250,000        4,301,000        4,234,000

   Net effect of dilutive stock options
      and warrants ) based on treasury stock
      method using ending market price,
      if higher than average market price               --               --               --               --
                                                 -----------      -----------      -----------      -----------

   Total                                           4,323,000        4,250,000        4,301,000        4,234,000
                                                 ===========      ===========      ===========      ===========

   Net loss                                      $(2,916,000)     $   (85,000)     $(6,559,000)     $  (713,000)
                                                 ===========      ===========      ===========      ===========

   Per share amount                              $      (.67)     $      (.02)     $     (1.52)     $      (.17)
                                                 ===========      ===========      ===========      ===========
</TABLE>
# C_2022257EN.01003801.xml

| 4.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 257/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 257/38

---

Action brought on 12 May 2022 — Mostovdrev v Council

(Case T-259/22)

(2022/C 257/49)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: AAT Mostovdrev (Mosty, Belarus) (represented by: N. Tuominen and L. Engelen, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/356 of 2 March 2022 amending Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus (1), and Council Regulation (EU) 2022/355 of 2 March 2022 amending Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 (2), in their entirety insofar as they affect the applicant; and |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/356 of 2 March 2022 amending Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus (1), and Council Regulation (EU) 2022/355 of 2 March 2022 amending Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 (2), in their entirety insofar as they affect the applicant; and

| — | orader the Council to pay the costs occasioned by these proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

orader the Council to pay the costs occasioned by these proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging that the contested measures contravene the duty to give reasons, infringe the right to a fair hearing and infringe the right to effective judicial protection. |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging that the contested measures contravene the duty to give reasons, infringe the right to a fair hearing and infringe the right to effective judicial protection.

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging that the contested measures breach the principle of equal treatment and misuse of powers. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging that the contested measures breach the principle of equal treatment and misuse of powers.

| 3. | Third plea in law, alleging that the contested measures are disproportionate, encroach upon the Union’s legislative competences and breach the applicant’s fundamental rights. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Third plea in law, alleging that the contested measures are disproportionate, encroach upon the Union’s legislative competences and breach the applicant’s fundamental rights.

---

(1)  OJ 2022, L 67, p. 103.

(2)  OJ 2022, L 67, p. 1.

---
# C_2021502EN.01003702.xml

| 13.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 502/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 502/37

---

Action brought on 15 October 2021 — YF v EFCA

(Case T-664/21)

(2021/C 502/56)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: YF (represented by: M. Casado García-Hirschfeld, lawyer)

Defendant: European Fisheries Control Agency

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare the present application admissible and well founded; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare the present application admissible and well founded;

in consequence,

| — | annul the contested decision of 18 February 2021 by which the applicant’s contract as a member of the temporary staff for an indefinite period was terminated; and annul, in so far as necessary, the rejection decision of 5 July 2021; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision of 18 February 2021 by which the applicant’s contract as a member of the temporary staff for an indefinite period was terminated; and annul, in so far as necessary, the rejection decision of 5 July 2021;

| — | order the defendant to pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay all the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law, which is divided into two parts.

| 1. | First part, alleging a manifest error of assessment. |
| --- | --- |

1.

First part, alleging a manifest error of assessment.

| 2. | Second part, alleging infringement of the principle of sound administration and of the principle of proportionality. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second part, alleging infringement of the principle of sound administration and of the principle of proportionality.

---
# C_2021412EN.01002601.xml

| 11.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 412/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.10.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 412/26

---

Action brought on 20 August 2021 — Epsilon Data Management v EUIPO — Epsilon Technologies (EPSILON TECHNOLOGIES)

(Case T-512/21)

(2021/C 412/28)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Epsilon Data Management LLC (Plano, Texas, United States) (represented by: J. Lindemans and J. Bussé, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Epsilon Technologies, SL (Sant Cugat del Valles, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark EPSILON TECHNOLOGIES — European Union trade mark No 8 914 855

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 1 June 2021 in Joined Cases R 1611/2020-5 and R 1839/2020-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare the application admissible, together with all the associated documents and the corresponding copies; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare the application admissible, together with all the associated documents and the corresponding copies;

| — | uphold the application, annul and set aside the contested decision and order the revocation of the contested EUTM No 8 914 855 due to non-use; |
| --- | --- |

—

uphold the application, annul and set aside the contested decision and order the revocation of the contested EUTM No 8 914 855 due to non-use;

| — | order the defendant to bear the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to bear the costs of the proceedings.

Plea in law

| — | No genuine use of the contested EUTM is established (Articles 18(1)(a) and 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council). |
| --- | --- |

—

No genuine use of the contested EUTM is established (Articles 18(1)(a) and 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council).

---
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Provident Bankshares
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Dennis
A. Starliper, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
             15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
             material respects, the financial condition and results of
             operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the
             Report.


                                        /s/    Dennis A. Starliper
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Dennis A. Starliper
                                        Chief Financial Officer

November 8, 2004
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-14-0000002 17-MAR-2014 08:40 AM
No. 11-11080.

#### Davis *v.*Kia Motors of America et al.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# C_2023035EN.01005901.xml

| 30.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 35/59 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 35/59

---

Judgment of the General Court of 30 November 2022 — Korporaciya ‘Masternet’ v EUIPO — Stayer Ibérica (STAYER)

(Case T-155/22) (1)

(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU figurative mark STAYER - Genuine use of the mark - Article 15 and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 18 and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Classification of the goods in respect of which genuine use has been shown)

(2023/C 35/72)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: ZAO Korporaciya ‘Masternet’ (Moscow, Russia) (represented by: N. Bürglen, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Stayer Ibérica, SA (Pinto, Spain) (represented by: P. Creta, A. Lanzarini, A. Sponzilli, B. Costa and M. Lazzarotto, lawyers)

Re:

By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 21 December 2021 (Case R 931/2021-1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders ZAO Korporaciya ‘Masternet’ to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders ZAO Korporaciya ‘Masternet’ to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 198, 16.5.2022.

---