alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2022207EN.01004801.xml

| 23.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 207/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 207/48

---

Action brought on 28 March 2022 — Transformers Manufacturing Company v EUIPO — H&F (TMC TRANSFORMERS)

(Case T-167/22)

(2022/C 207/64)

Language in which the application was lodged: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Transformers Manufacturing Company Pty Ltd (Melbourne, Australia) (represented by: F. Caricato, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: H&F Srl (Milan, Italy)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for the EU word mark TMC TRANSFORMERS — Application for registration No 17 264 664

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 February 2022 in Case R 1212/2021-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | first of all and principally, acknowledge H&F Srl’s lack of capacity and declare the proceedings at first and second instance before EUIPO inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

—

first of all and principally, acknowledge H&F Srl’s lack of capacity and declare the proceedings at first and second instance before EUIPO inadmissible;

| — | alter the contested decision on the ground that it is unfounded in fact and law and based on insufficient reasoning; |
| --- | --- |

—

alter the contested decision on the ground that it is unfounded in fact and law and based on insufficient reasoning;

| — | in the alternative, overturn the contested decision on the ground that it is unfounded in fact and law and refer the action back to EUIPO; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, overturn the contested decision on the ground that it is unfounded in fact and law and refer the action back to EUIPO;

| — | order EUIPO and the intervener to pay the costs for the three stages of legal proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and the intervener to pay the costs for the three stages of legal proceedings.

Pleas in law

| — | Lack of capacity to bring proceedings on the part of H&F Srl, a matter on which EUIPO did not rule and for which it did not provide sufficient reasons; |
| --- | --- |

—

Lack of capacity to bring proceedings on the part of H&F Srl, a matter on which EUIPO did not rule and for which it did not provide sufficient reasons;

| — | Incorrect assessment of the likelihood of confusion (Article 8 of Regulation No 207/2009) in fact and in law; |
| --- | --- |

—

Incorrect assessment of the likelihood of confusion (Article 8 of Regulation No 207/2009) in fact and in law;

| — | Failure to state sufficient reasons for the contested decision. |
| --- | --- |

—

Failure to state sufficient reasons for the contested decision.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 949 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 949

    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow charitable 
  organizations to make statements relating to political campaigns if 
such statements are made in the ordinary course of carrying out its tax 
                            exempt purpose.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 2019

   Mr. Scalise (for himself, Mr. Hice of Georgia, and Mr. Johnson of 
  Louisiana) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow charitable 
  organizations to make statements relating to political campaigns if 
such statements are made in the ordinary course of carrying out its tax 
                            exempt purpose.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Free Speech Fairness Act''.

SEC. 2. ALLOWING 501(C)(3) ORGANIZATION TO MAKE STATEMENTS RELATING TO 
              POLITICAL CAMPAIGN IN ORDINARY COURSE OF CARRYING OUT ITS 
              TAX EXEMPT PURPOSE.

    (a) In General.--Section 501 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(s) Special Rule Relating to Political Campaign Statements of 
Organization Described in Subsection (c)(3).--
            ``(1) In general.--For purposes of subsection (c)(3) and 
        sections 170(c)(2), 2055, 2106, 2522, and 4955, an organization 
        shall not fail to be treated as organized and operated 
        exclusively for a purpose described in subsection (c)(3), nor 
        shall it be deemed to have participated in, or intervened in 
        any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any 
        candidate for public office, solely because of the content of 
        any statement which--
                    ``(A) is made in the ordinary course of the 
                organization's regular and customary activities in 
                carrying out its exempt purpose, and
                    ``(B) results in the organization incurring not 
                more than de minimis incremental expenses.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years ending after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2023094EN.01000901.xml

| 13.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/9

---

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 17 January 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Słupsku — Poland) — KL and Others v Skarb Państwa — Sąd Okręgowy w Koszalinie, Sąd Rejonowy w Szczecinku and Others

(Case C-410/22) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for an answer from the Court - Lack of sufficient information - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2023/C 94/09)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Okręgowy w Słupsku

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: KL and Others

Defendants: Skarb Państwa — Sąd Okręgowy w Koszalinie, Sąd Rejonowy w Szczecinku and Others

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy Wydział Cywilny w Słupsku (Regional Court, Słupsk, Poland), made by decision of 17 September 2021, is manifestly inadmissible.

---

(1)  Date lodged: 20.6.2022.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM HALTER
MARINE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS-SEPTEMBER
30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                              62
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       63
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        119
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   247
<PP&E>                                             159
<DEPRECIATION>                                      57
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     382
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               85
<BONDS>                                            185
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                         106
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       382
<SALES>                                            300
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   300
<CGS>                                              260
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      260
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    18
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   3
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     19
<INCOME-TAX>                                         6
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 13
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        13
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .46
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant
to Section 906

Of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned
officers of Rand Capital Corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 (the Form10-K) of the Company fully complies with the
requirement of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: March 15, 2012

LOGO

Allen F. Grum, President

(Chief Executive Officer)

Dated: March 15, 2012

LOGO

Daniel P. Penberthy, Treasurer

(Chief Financial Officer)



55
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 49 (Thursday, March 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 11851]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6298]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

HQ USAF Scientific Advisory Board Meeting

    The JMASS Ad Hoc Study of the HQ USAF Scientific Advisory Board 
will meet on April 4, 1997 at Wright-Patterson AFB OH from 8:00 a.m. to 
5:00 p.m.
    The purpose is to receive an all day demonstration and caucus with 
the demo of JMASS at the program office for JMASS.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with Section 
552b of Title 5, United States Code, specifically subparagraphs (1) and 
(4) thereof.
    For further information, contact the HQ USAF Scientific Advisory 
Board Secretariat at (703) 697-8404.
Carolyn A. Lunsford,
Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-6298 Filed 3-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3910-01-P
### Martin , Michae l (OST )

From : Gen e Lync h I I [gene2@lynox.com ] ' •^'rnn'AT'n* ' Sent : Thursday , Februar y02 , 201 2 10:5 2 A M

. ; i^!p:iD

. ^'4^^^,, , 

### To : EAS(OST ) • ; urthMnuiV o Subject : PQ I Airpor t 

### L i P I? : llU Gentlemen : I amwritin g t o yo u i naneffor t t o conve ym ysuppor t fo r continue d ai r servic e t o Th e Norther nMain e Regiona l Airpor t (PQI ) an d i n particular j commute r ai r service . Colga nAi r a s I understand ha s petitione d th e FA ADO T t o discontinu e ai r servic e t o PQ I unde r th e curren t EAS agreement . A s a busines s locate d i n Presqu e Isle , I a mappealin g t o yo u t o continu e ai r servic e wit hequipmen t a t minimu mcomparabl e t o th e existin g Saa b34 0 tha t Colga n Ai r i s currentl yusing . Goin g wit hsmalle r plane s woul d b e extremel ydetrimenta l t o th e busines s community , i nfac t manypeopl e wh o d o trave l u p her e questio n whyw e don' t hav e je t servic e leadin g m e t o believ e tha t goin g wit hsmalle r aircraf t suc ha s wha t Cap e Ai r o r AirChoic e ar e willin g t o provid e woul d encourag e traveler s t o driv e rathe r tha n fl yt o PQI . Adro p i n passenge r seat s lik e thi s woul d en d u p requirin g a large r subsidythroug hEA S thu s helpin g n o one , i nfac t studie s hav e show ntha t wit hlarge r airplane s and mor e competitiv e trave l fares , w e woul d experienc e mor e passenge r volume . Thi s woul d g o a lon g wayt o improv e th e effectivenes s an

d efficienc yo f th e EA S program... a wi n wi n fo r th e whol e programand ou r entir e region !
A s a busines s ma nan d mediva c pilo t wh o us e thi s airpor t and ai r servic e frequently , I recogniz e th e valu e o f havin g regular , schedule d ai r servic e and a t th e veryleas t maintai n th e siz e aircraf t an d frequenc yo f flight s tha t w e currentl yar e provided . Bein g locate d 16 0 mile s awayfro mth e nex t sizabl e airpor t onl yconfirm s th e fac t tha t thi s servic e i s no t a luxurybu t verymuc hindee d a necessar yvita l transportatio n link fo r ou r entir e region! ! Than k yo u fo r takin g th e tim e t o liste n t o ou r concerns . Gen e Lync hI I Presiden t Lyno xInc . 4 6 Industria l Stree t Presqu e Isle , M E 0476 9 (207)764-651 1 wor k (207)764-654 1 fa x (207)227-651 1 gene2(g)lvnox.co

m
No. 11-10896.

#### Ortiz-Rodriguez *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 23

             CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the:

1.   Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 2-76789) pertaining to the Reynolds
     Metals Company 1982 Nonqualified Stock Option Plan;

2.   Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-13822) pertaining to the Reynolds
     Metals Company 1987 Nonqualified Stock Option Plan;

3.   Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-44400) pertaining to the Reynolds
     Metals Company 1992 Nonqualified Stock Option Plan;

4.   Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-20498) pertaining to the Reynolds
     Metals Company Savings and Investment Plan for Salaried Employees;

5.   Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 33-43443) pertaining to the shelf
     registration of debt securities of Reynolds Metals Company;

6.   Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-66032) pertaining to the Reynolds
     Metals Company Savings Plan for Hourly Employees;

7.   Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 33-51153) pertaining to the offer and
     resale of shares of Reynolds Metals Company Common Stock by the Trustee of
     the Reynolds Metals Company Pension Plans Master Trust;

8.   Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-53847) pertaining to the Employees
     Savings Plan;

9.   Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-53851) pertaining to the Reynolds
     Metals Company Restricted Stock Plan for Outside Directors;

10.  Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 33-59168) pertaining to the
     registration of debt securities of Canadian Reynolds Metals Company Ltd.;

11.  Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 33-51631) pertaining to the
     registration of convertible preferred stock of Reynolds Metals Company;
     and

12.  Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-00929) pertaining to the Reynolds
     Metals Company Performance Incentive Plan,

and in the related prospectuses of our report dated February 16, 1996, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements of Reynolds Metals Company
included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,
1995.

Ernst & Young LLP

Richmond, Virginia
March 1, 1996
No. 11-10386.

#### Potvin *v.*California.

Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
Order filed December 15, 2011.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-11-00831-CR

____________

JORGE ALBERTO GARIVALDI, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 177th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1309850

O R D E R

The reporter's record in this case was due November 21, 2011 See Tex. R. App. P.

35.2. Janet Ragan has not filed the reporter's record. Janet Ragan has not filed an 

extension of time to file the reporter's record. We therefore issue the following order.

We order Janet Ragan to file the record in this appeal on or before January 17, 

2012.

PER CURIAM
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74

38 40 42



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 06/21 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 21 Jun 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.86 N 77.06 WMeters AGL
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 7, 2019

No. 04-18-00360-CR

Deandre Jerome DORCH,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CR9222B

The Honorable Laura Lee Parker, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The State's Motion for Permission to File Post-Submission Supplemental Brief is hereby 

GRANTED. 

It is so ORDERED on June 7, 2019.

 PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _______________________

 Keith E. Hottle

 Clerk of Court
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**Certification ofChief Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, James E. Skinner, certifythat:

 

1.               Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The Neiman Marcus Group,Inc.;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge,this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)     designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

b)     evaluated the effectivenessof the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

c)     disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfirst fiscal quarter) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

 

5.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)     all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

b)     any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: December 8, 2003

 

 
|   | /s/  JAMES E. SKINNER                                         |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | **James E. Skinner  Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer** |

 

----
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarter report on Form 10-Q of National Housing Trust Limited Partnership (the Partnership) for the period ending June
30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Susan E. Basting, Chief Financial Officer of NHT, Inc., general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |    |  |                                           
|-------------------- |  | -- |  | ------------------------------------------
|Date August 23, 2004 |  | By |  | /s/ Susan E. Basting                      
|                     |  |    |  | Susan E. Basting,                         
|                     |  |    |  | Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer     
|                     |  |    |  | NHT, Inc., General Partner for            
|                     |  |    |  | National Housing Trust Limited Partnership
No. 11-10704.

#### Brown *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
No. 11-10804.

#### LaBorde *v.*Virginia et al.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF

THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Kyle Moran, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of WAVE Life Sciences Ltd.
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 29, 2016



|                                                                                            
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                            
|/s/ Kyle Moran                                                                              
|Kyle Moran                                                                                  
|Vice President, Head of Finance(principal financial officer and principalaccounting officer)