alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FROM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AND RELATED NOTES FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       2,709,718
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    169,374
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,927,112
<PP&E>                                       1,377,024
<DEPRECIATION>                                 768,090
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,616,199
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          344,429
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        42,990
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,204,659
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,616,199
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,751,159
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,694,448)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,694,448)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,694,448)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.38)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 44 (Thursday, March 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 10291]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5536]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[CO-956-96-1420-00]


Colorado; Filing of Plats of Survey

February 25, 1997.
    The plats of survey of the following described land, will be 
officially filed in the Colorado State Office, Bureau of Land 
Management, Lakewood, Colorado, effective 10:00 am., February 25, 1997. 
All inquiries should be sent to the Colorado State Office, Bureau of 
Land Management, 2850 Youngfield Street, Lakewood, Colorado 80215.
    The plat (in six sheets) representing the dependent resurvey of 
portions of the subdivisional lines, and certain mineral claims and 
portions thereof and the subdivision of section 29, T. 1 N., R. 71 W., 
Sixth Principal Meridian, Group 1008, Colorado, was accepted February 
3, 1997.
    This survey requested by the Forest Service for administrative 
purposes.
    The plat representing the dependent resurvey of portions of the 
south boundary, subdivisional lines, and the section subdivision lines 
of section 35, T. 1 S., R. 1 W., Ute Principal Meridian, Group 1144, 
Colorado, and the completion survey of section 35, the subdivision, the 
metes-and-bounds survey of lots and private land parcels A & B, the 
original meander of the left bank, and the informative traverse of the 
meanders of the actual right bank of the Gunnison River, all in section 
35, was accepted February 10, 1997.
    This survey was requested by BLM for administrative purposes.
    The amended plat correcting the bearings and distances on the west 
boundary T. 33 N., R. 6 W., New Mexico Principal Meridian, Colorado, 
was accepted January 7, 1997.
    The supplemental plat showing the correct position of corner no. 7 
and line 7-1 of the Maysville Townsite and creating new lot 20 in 
section 3, T. 49 N., R. 7 E., New Mexico Principal Meridian, Colorado, 
was accepted January 9, 1997.
    These plats were requested by BLM for administrative purposes.
Colin R. Kelley,
Acting Chief Cadastral Surveyor for Colorado.
[FR Doc. 97-5536 Filed 3-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JB-P
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 51 (Monday, March 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 12677]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6656]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of Secretary


Fitness Determination of M & N Aviation, Inc.

AGENCY: Department of Transportation.

ACTION: Notice of Commuter Air Carrier Fitness Determination---Order 
97-3-12; Order to Show Cause.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Transportation is directing all interested 
persons to show cause why it should not issue an order finding that M & 
N Aviation, Inc., is fit, willing, and able to conduct scheduled 
passenger operations as a commuter air carrier.

DATES: Persons wishing to file objections should do so no later than 
March 27, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Objections and answers to objections should be filed with 
the Air Carrier Fitness Division, X-56, Room 6401, U.S. Department of 
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590 and 
should be served upon the parties listed in Attachment A to the order.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Janet A. Davis, Air Carrier 
Fitness Division (X-56, Room 6401), U.S. Department of Transportation, 
400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590, (202) 366-9721.

    Dated: March 12, 1997.
Charles A. Hunnicutt,
Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs.
[FR Doc. 97-6656 Filed 3-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
# C_2022213EN.01004602.xml

| 30.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 213/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 213/46

---

Action brought on 12 April 2022 — Conféderation nationale du Crédit Mutuel and Others v ECB

(Case T-189/22)

(2022/C 213/64)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Conféderation nationale du Crédit Mutuel (Paris, France) and the 37 other applicants (represented by: A. Gosset-Grainville, M. Trabucchi and M. Dalon, lawyers)

Defendant: European Central Bank

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul section 1.4 and sections 3.4.1 to 3.4.8 of ECB decision No ECB-SSM-2022-FRCMU-6 of 2 February 2022 (together with its annexes), in so far as it prescribes measures to be taken in relation to irrevocable payment commitments concerning the deposit guarantee schemes or resolution funds; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul section 1.4 and sections 3.4.1 to 3.4.8 of ECB decision No ECB-SSM-2022-FRCMU-6 of 2 February 2022 (together with its annexes), in so far as it prescribes measures to be taken in relation to irrevocable payment commitments concerning the deposit guarantee schemes or resolution funds;

| — | order the defendant to pay all the costs |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay all the costs

| — | adopt, under Articles 88 and 89 of the Rules of Procedure, a measure of organisation of procedure seeking to have the ECB disclose the decisions concerning irrevocable payment commitments taken in respect of other banking institutions for 2021, particularly those relating to the other French banking institutions. |
| --- | --- |

—

adopt, under Articles 88 and 89 of the Rules of Procedure, a measure of organisation of procedure seeking to have the ECB disclose the decisions concerning irrevocable payment commitments taken in respect of other banking institutions for 2021, particularly those relating to the other French banking institutions.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants rely on four pleas in law which are identical or similar to those relied upon in Case T-186/22, BNP Paribas v European Central Bank.

---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 46 (Monday, March 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 10830]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5869]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers


Transfer of Jurisdiction of a Portion of Joliet Army Ammunition 
Plant to the Department of Agriculture for the Midewin National 
Tallgrass Prairie

AGENCY: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DOD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On November 6, 1996, in accordance with Pub. L. 104-106, Title 
XXIX, Subtitle A, entitled ``Illinois Land Conservation Act of 1995'', 
the Department of the Army signed a Secretariat Memorandum to transfer 
approximately 15,080.53 acres of land and improvements at Joliet Army 
Ammunition Plant, Illinois to the Department of Agriculture for use by 
the Forest Service as the Midewin National Tallgrass Prairie. The 
purpose of this notice is to effect that transfer pursuant to the 
provisions of Sec. 2912 (e)(2) of Pub. L. 104-106.
    This is a partial transfer of the entire acreage contemplated by 
the statute. Additional transfers will be made in the future. A map 
dated December 4, 1996 and a legal description dated December 3, 1996 
of the property which is the subject of the subject transfer, are on 
file with the U.S. Army Engineer District, Corps of Engineers, 
Louisville, Kentucky and the Office of the Regional Forester, USDA, 
Forest Service.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. Charles E. Woods, 502-625-7104.

ADDRESSES: Documents are on file at locations:

1. U.S. Army Engineer District, Louisville, Corps of Engineers, P.O. 
Box 59, Louisville, Kentucky 40201-9889.
2. Office of the Regional Forester, USDA, Forest Service 310 W. 
Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53203.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: None.
Michael G. Barter,
Chief, Real Estate Division.
[FR Doc. 97-5869 Filed 3-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-JB-M
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 928 

To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to identify aliens who have 

served, or are serving, in the Armed Forces of the United States when 

those aliens apply for an immigration benefit or are placed in an immigration enforcement proceeding, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 30, 2019 

Mr. VARGAS (for himself, Mr. TAKANO, Mr. VELA, and Ms. GABBARD) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to identify 

aliens who have served, or are serving, in the Armed 

Forces of the United States when those aliens apply 

for an immigration benefit or are placed in an immigration enforcement proceeding, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Immigrant Veterans 

5 Eligibility Tracking System (I–VETS) Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 928 IH

1 SEC. 2. IDENTIFYING ALIENS CONNECTED TO THE ARMED 

2 FORCES. 

3 The Secretary of Homeland Security shall— 

4 (1) identify aliens, when those aliens apply for 

5 an immigration benefit or are placed in an immigra6 tion enforcement proceeding, who are serving, or 

7 have served, as a member of a regular or reserve 

8 component of the Armed Forces of the United 

9 States on active duty or as a member of a reserve 

10 component of the Armed Forces in an active status; 

11 and 

12 (2) annotate all immigration and naturalization 

13 records of the Department of Homeland Security re14 lating to an alien identified pursuant to paragraph 

15 (1) so as to reflect that identification and afford an 

16 opportunity to track the outcomes for such aliens. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
# C_2022191EN.01003302.xml

| 10.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 191/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 191/33

---

Action brought on 10 March 2022 — Société des produits Nestlé v EUIPO — Impossible Foods (IMPOSSIBLE SAUSAGE)

(Case T-132/22)

(2022/C 191/43)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Société des produits Nestlé SA (Vevey, Switzerland) (represented by: A. Jaeger-Lenz, M. Goldmann and C. Elkemann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Impossible Foods Inc. (Redwood City, California, United States)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark IMPOSSIBLE SAUSAGE — European Union trade mark No 18 061 982

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 December 2021 in Case R 972/2021-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings before the General Court and order the intervener to pay the costs before the EUIPO. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings before the General Court and order the intervener to pay the costs before the EUIPO.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 94(1), second sentence, read in conjunction with Article 70(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 94(1), second sentence, read in conjunction with Article 70(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 95(1), first sentence, read in conjunction with third sentence of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 95(1), first sentence, read in conjunction with third sentence of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
EXHIBIT 12

                    THE QUAKER OATS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
                                
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES


(Dollars in Millions)                                     
                                                             Year Ended
                                                   Dec. 31, 1995    Jun 30, 1995

Earnings:                                                       
  Income from Continuing Operations
     Before Income Taxes and Cumulative 
     Effect of Accounting Changes                       $25.6        $1,359.9
  Add Fixed Charges,  net of capitalized interest        64.4           132.4

    Earnings                                            $90.0        $1,492.3
                                                                
                                                                
Fixed Charges :
  Interest on Indebtedness                              $62.1        $  122.7
  Portion of rents representative of the                        
     interest factor                                      5.6            11.7
  Fixed Charges                                         $67.7        $  134.4
                                                                
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges (a)                   1.33           11.10
                                                
                                                                
                                                                


(a)  For  purposes  of computing the ratio of earnings  to  fixed
charges,  earnings  represent income from  continuing  operations
before  income taxes and cumulative effect of accounting  changes
plus  fixed charges (net of capitalized interest).  Fixed charges
represent  interest  (whether expensed or capitalized)  and  one-
third  (the portion deemed representative of the interest factor)
of rents.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 0733 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, vs. CELEVE ERNEST SPANG,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including October 3 , 202 4, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 29 2024

08/29/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0733
February 7, 2003

Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated
80 Park Plaza
Newark, New Jersey 07102

We have audited the financial statements of Public Service Enterprise Group
Incorporated and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and for each
of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2002, included in your
Annual Report on Form 10-K to the Securities and Exchange Commission and have
issued our report thereon dated February 7, 2003, which expresses an unqualified
opinion. Note 3 to such financial statements contains a description of your
adoption during the year ended December 31, 2002, of a change in the method of
accounting to present certain energy trading contract assets and liabilities on
a net basis where the legal right of offset exists. In our judgment, such change
is to an alternative accounting principle that is preferable under the
circumstances.

Yours truly,

Deloitte & Touche LLP
Parsippany, New Jersey
Argued and submitted April 21;

portion of judgments imposing a $255 DUII conviction fee reversed, otherwise affirmed June 1;

petition for review denied August 24, 2017 (361 Or 803)

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Plaintiff-Respondent, v.*ANGEL V. BROWN, aka Angel Valentine Brown, *Defendant-Appellant.*

Multnomah County Circuit Court

15CR19093, 15CR22243, 15CR24796; A160730 (Control), A160731, A160732

395 P3d 82

Kyle Krohn, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, Office of Public Defense Services.

Adam Holbrook, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Susan Yorke, Assistant Attorney General.

Before Armstrong, Presiding Judge, and Shorr, Judge, and Wollheim, Senior Judge.

*873PER CURIAM

In this consolidated appeal, defendant appeals three judgments of conviction for second-degree criminal trespass, ORS 164.245. Each of the judgments contains a $255 driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII) conviction fee under ORS 813.020. On appeal, defendant challenges the imposition of the DUII conviction fees, which we address below. We reject without discussion defendant’s first assignment of error.

Defendant contends that the trial court erred in imposing in each judgment a $255 DUII conviction fee because defendant was not convicted of any DUII crime. The state concedes that the trial court erred in imposing those amounts, based on our decision in *State v. Williams,*280 Or App 631, 380 P3d 1225, *rev den,*360 Or 604 (2016). We agree and accept the state’s concession. In each of the three judgment forms here, there is a pre-typed $255 DUII conviction fee with a box next to it followed by the word “waived.” The box for “waived” is not checked in the judgments. As we explained in *Williams,*which addressed the same judgment form, “ [r] egardless of the fact that it is a form, and perhaps a not clear one, it is a form of judgment with a money award [, which is] a legal document with potential financial consequences to defendant.” 280 Or App at 632. Accordingly, we reverse the portion of the judgments that impose a $255 DUII conviction fee.

Portion of judgments imposing a $255 DUII conviction fee reversed; otherwise affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF NORTHLAND CRANBERRIES, INC. AS OF AND FOR
THE 3 MONTHS ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1997
<CASH>                                             311
<SECURITIES>                                     1,260
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,607
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     38,790
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                55,099
<PP&E>                                         164,413
<DEPRECIATION>                                  25,028
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 198,614
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,661
<BONDS>                                         95,084
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           138
<OTHER-SE>                                      67,893
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   198,614
<SALES>                                         18,356
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,431
<CGS>                                            9,008
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,242
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,432
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    181
<INCOME-TAX>                                        79
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                102
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       102
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
        

</TABLE>