alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
2018 EAVS Data Brief: North Carolina EAVS Jurisdictions 

100 

 Voter Registration 

Total Registered Voters, 

Nov. 20181 

7,095,209 

1 A1a of EAVS 

Registration Forms Received, 

E-Day 2016 – E-Day 20182 

2,672,101 

2 A3a of EAVS 

New Voters Registered, 

E-Day 2016 – E-Day 20183 

916,291 

3 A3b of EAVS 

Sources of Registration Forms4 

4 A4a-l of EAVS 

Mail/Fax/Email 380,392 

In-Person 573,404 

Online 0 

Motor Vehicle Office 1,264,821 

Public Assistance 

Office 49,613 

Disability Office 1,592 

Military Recruitment 

Office 12 

Other Non-NVRA 

Office 6,405 

Registration Drives 153,142 

Other Sources or 

Not Categorized 242,720 

 Voter Turnout 

Voters Participating by Mode5 

Other Mode 

22,374 

1% 

In-Person E-Day 

1,666,500 In-Person Early 45% 1,926,639 

52% 

By Mail 

89,711 

2% 

5 In-person Election Day 

voters is F1b. By-mail voters 

is F1d+F1g. In-person early 

voters is F1f. Other mode is 

F1c+F1e+F1h. 

Total Turnout:6 3,705,224 

6 F1a of EAVS 

Provisional Voters:7 14,460 

7 F1e of EAVS 

UOCAVA Voters:8 7,914 

8 F1c of EAVS 

Election Technology 

Technology Used by Jurisdictions9 

100

66

25 

0 

DRE w/o DRE with Ballot Scanner Hand Electronic 

0 

VVPAT VVPAT Marking Count Poll Book 

Device 

88 



9 F3a-d, F5a-F8a, and 

F11a of EAVS 

Election Policies 

✔ Has online voter registration10 

10 Q6 of Policy Survey 

✔ Has a form of same-day voter registration (SDR)11 

11 Q7 of Policy Survey 

Has all-mail elections statewide12 

Has all-mail elections in certain jurisdictions12 

12 Q9a of Policy Survey 

Allows voters to register as permanent absentee 

voters13 

13 Q10 of Policy Survey Requires excuse for by-mail voting14 

Requires excuse for in-person early or in-person 14 Q8 of Policy Survey 

absentee voting15 15 Q12a of Policy Survey 

Uses vote centers16 16 Q13 of Policy Survey 

Notes 

EAVS data and reports may be downloaded at 

www.eac.gov. 

Responses of “Does not apply” and “Data not available”

are shown as zeroes.
#### WILLIAM P. CORBETT, INC. v. WCAB (GAUTHIER)

587 CD 2017

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

10/26/2017

Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board, A16-0429

Reversed/Remanded
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8932 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8932

To provide that for purposes of determining compliance with title IX of 
the Education Amendments of 1972 in athletics, sex shall be determined 
 on the basis of biological sex as determined at birth by a physician.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 10, 2020

 Ms. Gabbard introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide that for purposes of determining compliance with title IX of 
the Education Amendments of 1972 in athletics, sex shall be determined 
 on the basis of biological sex as determined at birth by a physician.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protect Women's Sports Act of 
2020''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT.

    Section 901 of the Education Amendments of 1972 (20 U.S.C. 1681(a)) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(d) It shall be a violation of subsection (a) for a recipient of 
Federal funds who operates, sponsors, or facilitates athletic programs 
or activities to permit a person whose biological sex at birth is male 
to participate in an athletic program or activity that is designated 
for women or girls.''.
                                 <all>
```
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Mattie Jones, individually and as representative of the Estate of Albin 

Jones, deceased v. Harris County, Phillips Edison Grocery Center 

Operating Partnership I, L. P., and Virgata Property Company, LLC

Appellate case number: 01-20-00700-CV

Trial court case number: 2020-48838

Trial court: 164th District Court of Harris County

On April 19, 2022, during oral argument in the above-referenced appeal, the Court ordered 

that the parties provide supplemental briefing of no more than 3000 words on the issue of whether

the provisions of the Texas Human Resources Code cited by appellee Harris County deprive the 

courts of subject-matter jurisdiction over this dispute. See TEX. HUM. RES. CODE § 121.004. The 

Court ordered that Harris County’s supplemental brief was due within seven days of the oral 

argument, and that appellant Mattie Jones’s response was due seven days after the filing of Harris 

County’s supplemental brief. 

The Court would also like the parties to identify in their supplemental briefing any place 

in the appellate record where there is an indication that (1) sidewalks were present at the subject 

intersection or (2) Alvin Jones entered the crosswalk at the subject intersection from a sidewalk 

and was attempting to exit the crosswalk to another sidewalk without a curb ramp. 

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s Amparo Guerra

Acting for the Court

Date: April 20, 2022

Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Goodman, and Guerra.
# C_2022284EN.01001601.xml

| 25.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 284/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 284/16

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 14 April 2022 — Finanzamt Hannover-Nord v H Lebensversicherung

(Case C-258/22)

(2022/C 284/18)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesfinanzhof

Parties to the main proceedings

Defendant and appellant in the appeal on a point of law: Finanzamt Hannover-Nord

Applicant and respondent in the appeal on a point of law: H Lebensversicherung

Question referred

Is Article 56(1) of the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community (now Article 63(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union) to be interpreted as precluding a provision of a Member State under which, when determining the taxable amount for a corporation’s trade tax, dividends that derive from holdings in foreign companies of less than 10 % (free-float holdings) are to be added back to the taxable amount if and to the extent that those dividends have been deducted from the taxable amount in a previous step of the calculation, whereas, with regard to such dividends that derive from free-float holdings in companies with registered office in the Member State concerned, no deduction and, consequently, no add-back of the dividends is to take place in the calculation of the taxable amount for trade tax?

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

July 26, 2010 

s0719 

Order 

 

July 26, 2010 

140851 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 140851 

 COA: 295542 

Midland CC: 05-002305-FC 

RICHARD ALAN DELAVERN, JR, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 4, 2010 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
#### Milreace MALONE, Rickey Malone, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LEWISBURG, USP; Warden, Regional Office of P.A.; Dressier, Mr.; Hendricks, Mr., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-2266

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 13, 2018

Decided: March 15, 2018

Milreace Malone, Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Milreace Malone appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil action for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2012).* We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Malone’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Malone v. Lewisburg, USP,*No, 1:17-cv-02471-ELH, 2017 WL 6437188 (D. Md. filed Oct. 23, 2017 *&*entered Oct. 24, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*

*

 Although the district court dismissed the action without prejudice, the district court's order is final and appealable under *Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc’y, Inc.,*807 F.3d 619, 623 (4th Cir. 2015), and *Martin v. Duffy,*858 F.3d 239, 247 (4th Cir. 2017) ("repeated, ineffective attempts at amendment suggest that further amendment of the complaint would be futile”).
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****    - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский 

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

        - Student Loans
        - Grants
        - Laws
        - Data

            - taxonomy view
            - South Dakota 

# South Dakota 

# South Dakota 

                      -  July 15, 2021  U.S. Department of Education Approves South Dakota's Plan for Use of American Rescue Plan Funds to Support K-12 Schools and Students, Distributes Remaining $127 Million  
On Wednesday, July  7, the U.S. Department of Education (Department) announced the approval of  South Dakota's American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ARP ESSER) plans and distributed remaining ARP ESSER funds to them.
  **Tags:**South DakotaAmerican Rescue PlanPress Releases

## How Do I Find...?

                      - Student loans, forgiveness
                      - Higher Education Rulemaking
                      - College accreditation
                      - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
                      - FERPA
                      - FAFSA
                      - 1098, tax forms
                      - More...

## Information About...

                      - Elevating Teaching
                      - Early Learning
                      - Engage Every Student
                      - Unlocking Career Success
                      - Cybersecurity

----

*Our mission* is to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness by fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access.

          - Student Loans
          - Repaying Loans
          - Defaulted Loans
          - Loan Forgiveness
          - Loan Servicers
          - Grants & Programs
          - Apply for Pell Grants
          - Grants Forecast
          - Apply for a Grant

          - Laws & Guidance
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - Civil Rights
          - IDEA Website
          - Data & Research
          - Education Statistics
          - Postsecondary Education Data
          - ED Data Express
          - Nation's Report Card
          - What Works Clearinghouse
          - Open Data Platform
          - COVID Relief Data

          - About Us
          - Contact Us
          - ED Offices
          - Jobs
          - Press Releases
          - FAQs
          - Recursos en español
          - Budget, Performance
          - Privacy Program
          - Homeroom Blog

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information Quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
No. 11-1439.

#### Tripodi *v.*North Coventry Township, Pennsylvania.

Commw. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.
# C_2021252EN.01003301.xml

| 28.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/33

---

Action brought on 17 May 2021 — Neolith Distribution v EUIPO (Representation of an ornamental pattern)

(Case T-259/21)

(2021/C 252/44)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Neolith Distribution, SL (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: N. Fernández Fernández-Pacheco, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: Application for the European Union figurative mark (Representation of an ornamental pattern) — Application for registration No 18 162 188

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 March 2021 in Case R 2155/2020-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | issue a decision ordering EUIPO to accept that the registration of the application for the European Union pattern mark No 18 162 188 is valid in relation to all the goods in respect of which that mark seeks protection in Class 19; |
| --- | --- |

—

issue a decision ordering EUIPO to accept that the registration of the application for the European Union pattern mark No 18 162 188 is valid in relation to all the goods in respect of which that mark seeks protection in Class 19;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings before EUIPO and the General Court. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings before EUIPO and the General Court.

Plea in law

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
No. 11-10764.

#### Enriquez *v.*California.

Sup. Ct. Cal. Cer-tiorari denied.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 23.2
                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement on
Form S-3 of our report dated October 25, 1995, on our audits of the consolidated
financial statements of Sterling Chemicals Holdings, Inc., as of September 30,
1994 and 1995 and for each of the three years in the period ended September 30,
1995. We also consent to the reference to our Firm under the caption "Experts".



                                                COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.

Houston, Texas
July 7, 1997
-79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74

 37

 38

 39 ★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

05/30

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 30 May 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.92 N 77.01 W Meters AGL
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 42 (Tuesday, March 4, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 9684]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5210]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 341

[Docket No. 94N-0247]
RIN 0910-AA01


Cold, Cough, Allergy, Bronchodilator, and Antiasthmatic Drug 
Products for Over-the-Counter Human Use; Amendment of Monograph for OTC 
Bronchodilator Drug Products; Correction

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is correcting a final 
monograph for over-the-counter (OTC) bronchodilator drug products that 
appeared in the Federal Register of May 20, 1996 (61 FR 25142). The 
document amended the final monograph for OTC bronchodilator drug 
products by removing pressurized metered-dose aerosol container dosage 
forms for the ingredients epinephrine, epinephrine bitartrate, and 
racepinephrine hydrochloride. The document was published with an 
inadvertent error in one of the amendatory instructions. This document 
corrects that error.

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 4, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: LaJuana D. Caldwell, Office of Policy 
(HF-27), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 
20857, 301-443-2994.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In FR Doc. 96-12499, appearing on page 25142 
in the Federal Register of Monday, May 20, 1996, the following 
correction is made: On page 25146, in the 3d column, amendatory 
instruction 4 is corrected to read as follows:
    4. Section 341.76 is amended by removing the heading for paragraph 
(d)(2), and paragraphs (d)(2)(i) and (e), by redesignating paragraph 
(d)(2)(ii) as paragraph (d)(2), and by revising the heading of newly 
redesignated paragraph (d)(2) to read as follows:

    Dated: February 24, 1997.
William K. Hubbard,
Associate Commissioner for Policy Coordination.
[FR Doc. 97-5210 Filed 3-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
<PAGE>
 
                                                                       EXHIBIT 5

                     MAYOR, DAY, CALDWELL & KEETON, L.L.P.
                           700 LOUISIANA, SUITE 1900
                           HOUSTON, TEXAS 77002-2778  
                                (713) 225-7000        
                           TELECOPIER (713) 225-7047  
                                                   
                                                          100 CONGRESS AVENUE
                                                              SUITE 1500       
                                                      AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701-4042
                                                            (512) 320-9200     
                               June 20, 1997          TELECOPIER (512) 320-9292 


American Oncology Resources, Inc.
16825 Northchase Drive, Suite 1300
Houston, Texas 77060

Gentlemen:

     We have acted as counsel for American Oncology Resources, Inc., a Delaware 
corporation (the "Company"), in connection with the registration and proposed 
sale of up to 988,193 shares (the "Shares") of the common stock, par value $.01 
per share, of the Company ("Common Stock") that may be sold pursuant to the 
American Oncology Resources, Inc. 1993 Key Employee Stock Option Plan, as 
amended (the "Plan"), which sale will be registered by the Company's 
Registration Statement of Form S-8, filed with the Securities and Exchange 
Commission under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended ("Registration 
Statement").  In such capacity, we have familiarized ourselves with the 
Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws of the Company and have examined all 
statutes and other records, instruments and documents pertaining to the Company 
that we have deemed necessary to examine for the purposes of this opinion.

          Based upon our examination as aforesaid, we are of the opinion that:

          1.  The Company is a corporation duly incorporated, validly existing 
              and in good standing under the laws of the State of Delaware; and

          2.  Upon the sale of any Shares for the consideration approved by the
              Company's Board of Directors and in accordance with the terms of
              the Plan, such Shares will be duly authorized, validly issued,
              fully paid and nonassessable shares of the Common Stock.

     We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion with the Securities and 
Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Registration Statement and to the use 
of our name under Item 5, "Interest of Named Experts and Counsel" in the 
Registration Statement.

                                     Very truly yours,

                                    
                                     /s/ MAYOR, DAY, CALDWELL & KEETON, L.L.P.
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 Of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Rand Capital Corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that: The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 (the Form 10-K) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-K
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Dated: March 8, 2018LOGOAllen F. Grum, President
(Chief Executive Officer)  Dated: March 8, 2018LOGODaniel P. Penberthy, Treasurer (Chief Financial Officer)
<PAGE>

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT
     Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

        Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): March 31, 2003

                                 US UNWIRED INC.
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

          Louisiana                      000-22003               72-1457316
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(State or other jurisdiction     (Commission File Number)     (I.R.S. Employer
      of incorporation)                                      Identification No.)


          901 Lakeshore Drive
        Lake Charles, Louisiana                                      70601
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Address of principal executive offices)                           (Zip Code)


                                 (337) 436-9000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

                                 Not applicable.
          (Former name or former address, if changed since last report)

<PAGE>
Item 7. Financial Statements, Pro Forma Financial Information and Exhibits

     (c) Exhibits

       Exhibit No.              Description
      ---------------          ----------------

         99.1                  Press Release of US Unwired dated March 31, 2003

Item 9. Regulation FD Disclosure (provided under Item 12)

     On March 31, 2003, the Registrant issued a press release announcing its
2002 earnings. The Press Release is filed herewith as exhibit 99.1 and is
incorporated herein by reference. The information in the Press Release is to be
considered "filed" for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
incorporated by reference into the registration statements filed by the
Registrant under the Securities Act of 1933.


<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

                                  US UNWIRED INC.
                                  (Registrant)

Date:  March 31, 2003           By: /s/ Jerry E. Vaughn
            ---                    -----------------------------------------
                                   Jerry E. Vaughn
                                   Chief Financial Officer

<PAGE>

                                INDEX TO EXHIBITS

Exhibit No.      Description
-----------      -----------
   99.1          Press Release of US Unwired Inc. dated March 31, 2003