alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Belica Yanira GUZMAN-ESCOBAR, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 15-71981

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted February 13, 2018 *

Filed February 22, 2018

Mario Acosta, Jr., Esquire, Attorney, Law Office of Mario Acosta, Jr., Los Ange-les, CA, for Petitioner

Michael Christopher Heyse, Trial Attorney, DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent

Before: LEAVY, FERNANDEZ, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument, *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Bélica Yanira Guzman-Escobar, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. *Zehatye v. Gonzales,*453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir. 2006). We deny in the petition for review.

The record does not compel the conclusion that Guzman-Escobar established extraordinary or changed circumstances to excuse her untimely asylum application. *See*8 C.F.R. §§ 1208.4(a)(4), (5); *Toj-Culpatan v. Holder,*612 F.3d 1088, 1091-92 (9th Cir. 2010). Thus, Guzman-Escobar’s asylum claim fails.

Guzman-Escobar does not challenge the agency’s finding that she failed to establish past persecution, and substantial evidence supports the agency’s conclusion that, even if Guzman-Escobar’s family constitutes a particular social group, she failed to estab*566lish a nexus between the harm she fears and a protected ground. *See Ayala v. Holder,*640 F.3d 1095, 1097 (9th Cir. 2011) (even if membership in a particular social group is established, an applicant must still show that “persecution was or will be *on account*of his membership in such group” (emphasis in original)); *see also Zetino v. Holder,*622 F.3d 1007, 1016 (9th Cir. 2010) (“An [applicant’s] desire to be free from harassment by criminals motivated by theft or random violence by gang members bears no nexus to a protected ground.”). Thus, her withholding of removal claim fails.

Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because Guzman-Escobar failed to show it is more likely than not that she will be tortured by or with the consent or acquiescence of the government of Guatemala. *See Aden v. Holder,*589 F.3d 1040, 1047 (2009).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3,
# AVS



# Quality Management System Title: Domestic Change Worksheet 

### QPM# AIR-ANM-030-F4 Date: December 17. 2008 Revision 

### 1 

# Record ofContacts FDMS Docket No_FAA-Wltt/I/- 

# //60

_______________ z_& ••• a"._ ••••••.•••

__ ••• ••••••••••••• ,"'&_ ••••••• !2Z __ 

### With whom outside the FAA hasthis proIXJsalbeen discussed (e.g., ATA, RAA, ALPA, etc.)?

Organization Person Contacted 

### Date ATA Joe White June. 2010 Boeing Todd Essdslyn Jan. Feb & Aug, 2009 Bueing E,'/;'retl Groat Feb & March. 2009 Boeing Mike Siegehni1n Mnrch.2009

UNCONTROLLED COPY WHEN DOWNLOADED Check the Master List to Verify That This isthe COffed Revision Before Use
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 44 (Thursday, March 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 10270]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5729]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

Tuesday, March 11, 1997 at 10:00 a.m.

PLACE: 999 E Street, N.W., Washington, DC.

STATUS: This meeting will be closed to the public.

ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:

Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. Sec. 437g.
Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. Sec. 437g, Sec. 438(b), and Title 
26, U.S.C.
Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or 
arbitration.
Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a 
particular employee.

Thursday, March 13, 1997 at 10:00 a.m.

PLACE: 999 E Street, N.W., Washington, DC (ninth floor).

STATUS: This meeting will be open to the public.

ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:

Correction and Approval of Minutes.
Advisory Opinion 1997-01: Susan Bevill Livingston on behalf of Tom 
Bevill and the Bevill Foundation.
Petition for Rulemaking Filed by James Bopp, Jr., on Behalf of the 
National Right to Life Committee, Inc.; Notice of Availability.
Administrative Matters.

PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: Mr. Ron Harris, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 219-4155.
Marjorie W. Emmons,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 97-5729 Filed 3-4-97; 2:37 pm]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 1997 AND FROM THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          73,274
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,772
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                       1,058,278
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F2>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,493,053
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                      3,651,713
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,568,588)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,493,053
<SALES>                                        389,797
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               390,852
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  244,117
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             153,820
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (57,208)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (57,208)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (57,208)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>THE PARTNERSHIP HAS AN UNCLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET; THEREFORE, THE VALUE
IS $0.
<F2>THIS INFORMATION IS NOT DISCLOSED IN THE PARTNERSHIP'S FORM 10-Q FILING.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



     CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350


I, Bruce M. Goldberg, President and Chief Executive Officer of All American
Semiconductor, Inc., hereby certify, to my knowledge:

         (1)      that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of All American
                  Semiconductor, Inc. for the quarterly period ended on June 30,
                  2004 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
                  date hereof at File No. 0-16207 (the "Report") fully complies
                  with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
                  applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      that the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                  in all material respects, the financial condition and results
                  of operations of All American Semiconductor, Inc.

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.




Date:  August 13, 2004                     /s/ BRUCE M. GOLDBERG
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Bruce M. Goldberg
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 44 (Thursday, March 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 10263]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5488]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. CP97-249-000]


William Basin Interstate Pipeline Company; Notice of Request 
Under Blanket Authorization

February 28, 1997.
    Take notice that on February 14, 1997, Williston basin Interstate 
Pipeline Company (Williston Basin), 200 North Third Street, Suite 300, 
Bismarck, North Dakota 58501, filed in Docket No. CP97-249-000 a 
request pursuant to Secs. 157.205, 157.211, and 157.216 of the 
Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205, 
157.211, 157.216) for authorization to modify an existing tap and to 
abandon the operation of the existing tap at Station 68+97, located in 
Ramsey County, North Dakota, under Williston Basin's blanket 
certificate issued in Docket No. CP82-487-000, pursuant to Section 7(c) 
of the Natural Gas Act, all as more fully set forth in the request that 
is on file with the Commission and open to public inspection.
    Williston Basin proposes to modify an existing tap at Station 68+97 
located in Ramsey County, North Dakota, on its line from Cleveland to 
Grafton, North Dakota, to effectuate natural gas transportation 
deliveries to Montana-Dakota Utilities Company (Montana-Dakota), a 
local distribution company, under currently effective transportation 
service agreements. Williston Basin states the existing tap is owned 
and was installed by Montana-Dakota to serve industrial, commercial 
and/or residential customers. Williston Basin also proposes to abandon 
the operation of the existing tap at Station 68+97, located in Ramsey 
County, North Dakota.
    Williston Basin declares the authorization requested herein 
includes installation of a two-inch tap and riser connected by 
approximately twelve feet of two-inch pipe. Williston Basin asserts 
they will retain ownership of the two-inch tap, riser, and piping 
through the first high-pressure valve.
    Williston Basin states the estimated total cost of this project to 
be $3,700, 100% reimbursable by Montana-Dakota.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant Sec. 157.205 of the 
Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to the 
request. if no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, the 
proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the day 
after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest if filed and 
not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-5488 Filed 3-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# C_2023164EN.01003702.xml

| 8.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 164/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 164/37

---

Judgment of the General Court of 8 March 2023 — Mutondo v Council

(Case T-94/22) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo - Freezing of funds - Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States - Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered - Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded - Manifest error of assessment - Change of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures)

(2023/C 164/51)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Kalev Mutondo (Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo) (represented by: T. Bontinck, P. De Wolf, A. Guillerme and T. Payan, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: B. Driessen and M.-C. Cadilhac, acting as Agents)

Re:

By his action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment, first, of Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/2181 of 9 December 2021 amending Decision 2010/788/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic Republic of the Congo (OJ 2021 L 443, p. 75) and, second, of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2177 of 9 December 2021, implementing Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against persons acting in violation of the arms embargo with regard to the Democratic Republic of the Congo (OJ 2021 L 443, p. 3), in so far as those acts concern him.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/2181 of 9 December 2021 amending Decision 2010/788/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic Republic of the Congo and, Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2177 of 9 December 2021, implementing Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against persons acting in violation of the arms embargo with regard to the Democratic Republic of the Congo, in so far as those acts concern Mr Kalev Mutondo. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/2181 of 9 December 2021 amending Decision 2010/788/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic Republic of the Congo and, Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2177 of 9 December 2021, implementing Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against persons acting in violation of the arms embargo with regard to the Democratic Republic of the Congo, in so far as those acts concern Mr Kalev Mutondo.

| 2. | Orders the Council of the European Union to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Council of the European Union to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 148, 4.4.2022.

---
No. 11-10079.

#### Potter *v.*Hornbeck, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-10539.

#### MacWilliams *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Submitted November 15;

reversed and remanded for entry of a single conviction for third-degree assault, remanded for resentencing, otherwise affirmed December 14, 2016

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Plaintiff-Respondent, v.*COLLIN N. DAVIDSON, aka Collin Davidson, aka Colin N. Davidson, *Defendant-Appellant.*

Multnomah County Circuit Court

140130441; A156757

385 P3d 1284

Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Erik Blumenthal, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant.

Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Peenesh Shah, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Duncan, Presiding Judge, and DeVore, Judge, and Garrett, Judge.

*908PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals from a judgment imposing convictions for third-degree assault (Count 1) and fourth-degree assault (Count 2); he was acquitted of fourth-degree assault constituting domestic violence (Count 3). In his first assignment of error, defendant claims that the trial court erred by disallowing his demurrer to the indictment. We reject that claim without further discussion. In his second assignment of error, defendant contends that the trial court erred by entering separate convictions on Counts 1 and 2, when the verdicts on those counts should have merged into a single conviction for third-degree assault. *See*ORS 161.067(1) (specifying requirements to prevent merger). The state concedes that the trial court erred. We reverse and remand.

A jury found defendant guilty on Counts 1 and 2. At sentencing, defendant argued that the verdicts on those counts should merge. The trial court agreed: “So I think that on the facts of this case they do merge.” In its temporary sentencing order, the court specified, as to Count 2, “No sentence imposed; merges w/count 1 for purposes of conviction.” (Uppercase in original omitted.) The subsequently entered judgment, however, states,

> “It is adjudged that the defendant has been convicted on the following count(s):

> “Count 1: Assault-3

> «3⁄8 ‡‡3⁄8‡

> “Count 2: Assault in the Fourth Degree

> «* * * * *

> “Conviction is based upon a [j]ury [v]erdict of guilty ‡ 3⁄8 3⁄8 »

(Boldface and underscoring in original omitted.) The judgment specifies a sentence of probation on Count 1, but on Count 2, it states, “Defendant shall: [b]e convicted on this count, and the sentence on this count is merged with the sentence on count number 1.”

Defendant argues that the trial court erred by imposing separate convictions on Counts 1 and 2. The state *909concedes that having made findings that required Counts 1 and 2 to merge, the trial court erred by entering separate convictions on those counts. We agree, accept the state’s concession, and reverse and remand.

Reversed and remanded for entry of a single conviction for third-degree assault; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.
UAVSA Release 1.1 July 2015

U.S. D e p a rtme n t of T r a n sport a t io n

P a g e 1



# Transmitter Protocols

Ground Station Set up Checklist

A. PIC Operator

1. Unit: Check Transmitter for Damage

2. Battery: Check for Full Voltage B attery Packs (Test with Proper Battery Testing Unit for Actuals)

B. Remove Transmitter from Case, Inspect for damage Cracks, Antenna Secure,

switches, nobs, stick work properly.

C. Make Sure All Switches are in Start Positions

(All switches flipped away fro m operator)

LD and RD are Center

D. Power On Unit

Take note of Voltage and Time

E. Make Sure the correct UAS model is selected under “ model ”

Reset Timers (Timers are programmed to start when throttle is engaged)

F. Make sure all Trims are Centered

G. Connection, Test and Check UAS to Transmitter Parity

H. Perform Antenna Strength Test on Transmit

Gimbal Control

I. PIC Operator

3. Unit: Transmitter Protocols (Transmitter make and model)

4. Battery: Check for Full Voltage on

- B attery Packs (Test with Proper Battery

Testing Unit for Actuals)

J. Remove Transmitter from Case, Inspect for damage Cracks, Antenna Secure,

switches, nobs, stick work properly.

K. Make Sure All Switches are in Start Positions

(All switches flipped away fro m operator)

LD and RD are Center

L. Power On Unit ( Take note of Voltage and Time )UAVSA Release 1.1 July 2015

U.S. D e p a rtme n t of T r a n sport a t io n

P a g e 2

M. Make sure all Trims are Centered

N. Make Sure C orrect Video Downlink is selected

O. Reset Timers (Timers are programmed to start when you push start)

P. Power Off Unit

Q. Make Sure Antennas on Video Downlink a re tight and secure

R. Power On Video Downlink

S. Connection Test w/ Video Downlink Receiver

T. Perform Antenna Strength Test on Transmitter

U. Make sure Gimbal Functions are working correctly

V. Make sure Video Connection is clear and signal is strong.
No. 11-762.

#### Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services *v.*Southern Ute Indian Tribe.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
# C_2023024EN.01008403.xml

| 23.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/84 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/84

---

Order of the General Court of 22 November 2022 — Narzieva v Council

(Case T-238/22) (1)

(2023/C 24/114)

Language of the case: French

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 257, 4.7.2022.

---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 48 (Wednesday, March 12, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 11394]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6069]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1

[REG-209824-96]
RIN 1545-AU24


Definition of Limited Partner for Self-Employment Tax Purposes; 
Hearing

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service, Treasury.

ACTION: Proposed rule; change of location of public hearing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document changes the location of the public hearing on 
proposed regulations relating to the self-employment income tax imposed 
under section 1402 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

DATES: The public hearing is being held on Wednesday, May 21, 1997, 
beginning at 10:00 a.m. Requests to speak and outlines of oral comments 
must be received by April 30, 1997.

ADDRESSES: The public hearing originally scheduled in the IRS 
Auditorium, Internal Revenue Building, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW, 
Washington, DC is changed to room 5716, Internal Revenue Building, 1111 
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christina Vasquez of the Regulations 
Unit, Assistant Chief Counsel (Corporate), (202) 622-7180 (not a toll-
free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A notice of proposed rulemaking and notice 
of public hearing appearing in the Federal Register on Monday, January 
13, 1997 (62 FR 1702) announced that a public hearing on proposed 
regulations relating to the self-employment income tax imposed under 
section 1402 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 would be held on 
Wednesday, May 21, 1997, beginning at 10:00 a.m. in the IRS Auditorium, 
Internal Revenue Building, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 
and that requests to speak and outlines of oral comments should be 
received by Wednesday, April 30, 1997.
    The location of the pubic hearing has changed. The hearing is 
scheduled for Wednesday, May 21, 1997, beginning at 10:00 a.m. in room 
5716, Internal Revenue Building, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW, 
Washington, DC. We must receive the requests to speak and outlines of 
oral comments by Wednesday, April 30, 1997. Because of controlled 
access restrictions, attenders are not admitted beyond the lobby of the 
Internal Revenue Building until 9:45 a.m.
    The Service will prepare an agenda showing the scheduling of the 
speakers after the outlines are received from the persons testifying 
and make copies available free of charge at the hearing.
Cynthia E. Grigsby,
Chief, Regulations Unit, Assistant Chief Counsel (Corporate).
[FR Doc. 97-6069 Filed 3-11-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-U