alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.4(a)



 Exhibit 10.4(a) 
 June 1, 2013 
 AAA Capital Management Advisors, Ltd. 

1300 Post Oak Blvd. #350 
 Houston, Texas 77056

 Attention: Mr. Anthony Annunziato 
  

	 	Re:	Management Agreement Renewals 

 Dear
Mr. Annunziato: 
 We are writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the commodity pools to which reference is made below
(the “Management Agreements”). We are extending the term of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2014 and all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged. 

 

	 	•	 	 AAA Capital Energy Fund L.P. 



	 	•	 	 AAA Capital Energy Fund L.P. II 



	 	•	 	 AAA Master Fund LLC 



	 	•	 	 Orion Futures Fund L.P. 



	 	•	 	 Institutional Futures Portfolio L.P. 



	 	•	 	 Global Futures Fund LTD. 



	 	•	 	 Orion Futures Fund (Cayman) LTD. 



	 	•	 	 AAA ARC Feeder Fund L.P. 



Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of Mr. Damian George at the
address above or fax to 212-296-6868. If you have any questions I can be reached at 212-296-1292. 

Very truly yours, 
  

			
	 CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Damian George

		 	Damian George
		 	Chief Financial Officer & Director

  

			
	 AAA CAPITAL MANAGEMENT ADVISORS, LTD.

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ A. Anthony Annunziato

	 Print Name:
	 	A. Anthony Annunziato
	 DG/sr
FI LED U. S . COURT OF AP PE ALS E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT A ugus t 24, 2005 T HOM AS K. KAHN CL E RK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H]
I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O RT H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 04- 14803 N on -A rgum entC al endar

________________________ D
. C
. D ocketN o. 04 -000 44 -C V -W L S -1-2 J O S E P H P A I T , P la in tif f
- A p p e lle e , v ersu s C I T Y O F A L B A N Y , G E O R G I A , JA M E S A R R O W O O D , In d i v i du al l y an di n h i s o ffi ci al cap aci ty as C h i ef o f C i ty o f A lb an y F ir e D e p artm e n t, JA M E S C A R S W E L L , In d i v i du al l y an di n h i s o ffi ci al cap aci ty as D ep u ty F i re C h i ef o f C i ty o f A lb an yF ir e D e p artm e n t,
D e f e n d an ts - A p p e llan ts .

________________________ A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e M id d le D is tr ic t o f G e o r g ia

_________________________ ( A ugus t24, 2005)2

B efo re H U L L , W IL S O N an dG O D B O L D , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P E RC U R I A M: A f te rr e v ie w in g th e d is tr ic t c o u rt’s c o m p le te an dd e ta ile do r d e r , w e f in dth is
ap p e a l w ith o u t m e r it. AF F I R ME D.
#### Michael Owen DEVAUGHN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Darren MANNION; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 15-56723

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted February 13, 2018 *

Filed February 23, 2018

Michael Owen DeVaughn, Pro Se

Before: LEAVY, FERNANDEZ, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

California state prisoner Michael Owen DeVaughn appeals pro se from the district court’s order in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action revoking his application to proceed in for-ma pauperis as a sanction under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion. *Islamic Shura Council of S. Cal. v. FBI,*757 F.3d 870, 872 (9th Cir. 2014). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by revoking DeVaughn’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis as a sanction under Rule 11 because DeVaughn’s complaint misrepresented his prior federal litigation history. *See Warren v. Guelker,*29 F.3d 1386, 1389-90 (9th Cir. 1994) (a pro se prisoner’s misrepresentation about previous lawsuits may justify sanctions under Rule 11).

We do not consider issues or arguments not specifically and distinctly raised and argued in the opening brief. *See Padgett v. Wright,*587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.

**

**This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR LIBERTY TAX CREDIT PLUS L.P. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                      0000818020
<NAME>Liberty Tax Credit Plus L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                               1

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-15-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-16-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-15-2000
<CASH>                                      17,108,208
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  798,739
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,596,359
<PP&E>                                     259,048,626
<DEPRECIATION>                             106,550,132
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             175,587,562
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       35,948,024
<BONDS>                                    156,860,510
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                (17,220,972)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               175,587,562
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            27,579,413
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            24,514,371
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          10,125,299
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                               (6,711,295)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,711,295)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (415.59)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 12.01**

 

## **PUBLIC SERVICECOMPANY OF COLORADO**

**COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF CONSOLIDATED EARNINGS**

**TO CONSOLIDATED FIXED CHARGES**

 

| ** **                                                            | ** ** | **YEAR ENDED DEC. 31,**           | ** ** |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|-----------------------------------|------------|
| ** **                                                            | ** ** | **2004**                          | ** ** | **2003** | ** ** | **2002** | ** ** | **2001** | ** ** | **2000** | ** ** |
| ** **                                                            | ** ** | **(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT RATIOS)** | ** ** |
| EARNINGS:                                                             |       |                              |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Net income                                                            |       | $                                 | 218,005    |   | $ | 227,933 |   | $ | 264,680 |   | $ | 273,033 |   | $ | 196,128 |   |
| Provisions for Federal and state taxes on  income                     |       | 72,856                            |       | 88,211 |   | 128,686 |   | 132,501 |   | 102,770 |   |
| Fixed charges as below                                                |       | 260,822                           |       | 263,395 |   | 237,765 |   | 226,651 |   | 244,952 |   |
| Less: Undistributed equity in earnings of unconsolidated  affiliates  |       | —                            |       | — |   | — |   | — |   | — |   |
| Total                                                                 |       | $                                 | 551,683    |   | $ | 579,539 |   | $ | 631,131 |   | $ | 632,185 |   | $ | 543,850 |   |
| FIXED CHARGES:                                                        |       |                              |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Interest charges, excluding AFUDC — debt                         |       | $                                 | 260,822    |   | $ | 256,023 |   | $ | 223,021 |   | $ | 211,451 |   | $ | 229,752 |   |
| Distributions on redeemable preferred securities  of subsidiary trust |       | —                            |       | 7,372 |   | 14,744 |   | 15,200 |   | 15,200 |   |
| Total                                                                 |       | $                                 | 260,822    |   | $ | 263,395 |   | $ | 237,765 |   | $ | 226,651 |   | $ | 244,952 |   |
| RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                                    |       | 2.1                               |       | 2.2 |   | 2.7 |   | 2.8 |   | 2.2 |   |

 

1

----
# C_2021088EN.01004501.xml

| 15.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 88/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 88/45

---

Action brought on 1 February 2021 — ultra air v EUIPO — Donaldson Filtration Deutschland (ultrafilter international)

(Case T-67/21)

(2021/C 88/59)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: ultra air GmbH (Hilden, Germany) (represented by: C. König, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Donaldson Filtration Deutschland GmbH (Haan, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark ‘ultrafilter international’ — European Union trade mark No 1 121 839

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 5 November 2020 in Case R 271/2020-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO and Donaldson Filtration Deutschland GmbH, should it intervene in these proceedings, to pay the costs of the present proceedings and of the appeal proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and Donaldson Filtration Deutschland GmbH, should it intervene in these proceedings, to pay the costs of the present proceedings and of the appeal proceedings.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 67 in conjunction with Article 63(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 67 in conjunction with Article 63(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
# C_2023112EN.01003401.xml

| 27.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/34

---

Judgment of the General Court of 8 February 2023 — Sport1 v EUIPO — SFR (SFR SPORT1)

(Case T-141/22) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark SFR SPORT 1 - Earlier national and international figurative marks sport1 - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Distinctive character acquired through use - Interdependence between factors)

(2023/C 112/43)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Sport1 GmbH (Ismaning, Germany) (represented by: J. Krekel and C. Otto, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Markakis, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Société française du radiotéléphone — SFR (Paris, France) (represented by: M. Pasquier, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 10 December 2021 (Case R 2329/2020-1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Partially annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 10 December 2021 (Case R 2329/2020-1), in so far as the Board of Appeal found that there was no likelihood of confusion with regard to the services covered by the mark applied for which are referred to in paragraphs 42 to 44 and 52 to 61 of that decision; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Partially annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 10 December 2021 (Case R 2329/2020-1), in so far as the Board of Appeal found that there was no likelihood of confusion with regard to the services covered by the mark applied for which are referred to in paragraphs 42 to 44 and 52 to 61 of that decision;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Sport1 GmbH; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Sport1 GmbH;

| 4. | Orders Société française du radiotéléphone — SFR to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders Société française du radiotéléphone — SFR to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 191, 10.5.2022.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF NORTHLAND CRANBERRIES, INC. AS OF AND FOR
THE 9 MONTHS ENDED MAY 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                                             186
<SECURITIES>                                     1,260
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,635
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     21,787
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                34,452
<PP&E>                                         159,959
<DEPRECIATION>                                  22,189
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 176,129
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,160
<BONDS>                                         79,669
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           138
<OTHER-SE>                                      67,788
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   176,129
<SALES>                                         34,496
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                34,810
<CGS>                                           16,233
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,010
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,156
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,411
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,157
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,254
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,254
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.23
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarter report on Form 10-Q of National Housing Trust Limited Partnership (the
Partnership) for the period ending March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James A. Bowman, Chief Executive Officer of NHT, Inc. the general partner of the
Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |    |  |                                           
|--------------------- |  | -- |  | ------------------------------------------
|Date: August 22, 2007 |  | By |  | /s/ James A. Bowman                       
|                      |  |    |  | James A. Bowman,                          
|                      |  |    |  | President and Chief Executive Officer     
|                      |  |    |  | NHT, Inc., General Partner for            
|                      |  |    |  | National Housing Trust Limited Partnership
#### IN RE: Terry Jackson BENNETT, Petitioner.

No. 18-1158

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 8, 2018

Decided: March 14, 2018

Terry Jackson Bennett, Petitioner Pro Se.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and KING and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Terry Jackson Bennett petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court has dismissed Bennett’s § 2255 motion. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Bennett’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED*
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 7 (Friday, January 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 1446]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-541]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket Nos. TQ97-2-23-002 and TM97-6-23-001]


Eastern Shore Natural Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

January 6, 1997.
    Take notice that on December 31, 1996, Eastern Shore Natural Gas 
Company (ESNG) tendered for filing certain revised tariff sheets in the 
above captioned dockets as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised 
Volume No. 1, with proposed effective dates of November 1, 1996 and 
December 1, 1996, respectively.
    On November 26, 1996, ESNG filed with the Commission revised rates 
to reflect an out-of cycle purchased gas adjustment (PGA), proposed to 
be effective December 1, 1996. Subsequently, on December 6, 1996, ESNG 
filed tariff sheets to track rate changes attributable to storage 
service purchased from Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation 
(Transco) and to correct a clerical error in its previously accepted 
tracker filing. It has since come to ESNG's attention, per FERC Order 
dated December 20, 1996, that ESNG's original filings contained 
incorrectly paginated tariff sheets. The instant filing is being made 
to correct the pagination errors made in the original filings.
    ESNG states that copies of the filing have been served upon its 
jurisdictional customers and interested State Commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR Section 385.211). All such 
protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the 
Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission 
in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve 
to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-541 Filed 1-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# Journal officiel C 179A/25 m

| | ISSN 1977-0936 |
| --- | --- |
| Journal officiel
  de l'Union européenne | C 179A |
| | |
| Édition de langue française | Communications et informations | 61e année25 mai 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0936

Journal officiel

de l'Union européenne

C 179A

Édition de langue française

Communications et informations

61e année25 mai 2018

---

| Sommaire | page |
| --- | --- |
| | Rectificatifs |
| 2018/C 179 A/01 | Rectificatif à l’avis de recrutement no PE/197/S ( JO C 144 A du 25.4.2018 ) | 1 |

Sommaire

page

Rectificatifs

2018/C 179 A/01

Rectificatif à l’avis de recrutement no PE/197/S ( JO C 144 A du 25.4.2018 )

o

( JO C 144 A du 25.4.2018 )

1

---

| FR | |
| --- | --- |

FR

---

Rectificatifs

| 25.5.2018 | FR | Journal officiel de l'Union européenne | CA 179/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.5.2018

FR

Journal officiel de l'Union européenne

CA 179/1

---

Rectificatif à l’avis de recrutement no PE/197/S

(
  «Journal officiel de l’Union européenne» C 144 A du 25 avril 2018
  )

(2018/C 179 A/01)

À la page 1:

au lieu de:

«Le Parlement européen organise une procédure de sélection sur titres et épreuves pour la constitution d’une liste d’aptitude destinée au pourvoi de onze postes d’»,

lire:

lire:

«Le Parlement européen organise une procédure de sélection sur titres et épreuves pour la constitution d’une liste d’aptitude destinée au pourvoi de postes d’».

Page 2, au titre A.1 Généralités, premier paragraphe:

Page 2, au titre A.1 Généralités, premier paragraphe:

au lieu de:

au lieu de:

«Le Parlement européen a décidé d’ouvrir la procédure de pourvoi de onze postes temporaires d’agent de protection rapprochée (1) (AST 3) — Direction générale de la sécurité et de la protection, direction “Proximité et assistance, sécurité et sûreté”.»

lire:

lire:

«Le Parlement européen a décidé d’ouvrir la procédure de pourvoi de postes temporaires d’agent de protection rapprochée (1) (AST 3) — Direction générale de la sécurité et de la protection, direction “Proximité et assistance, sécurité et sûreté”.»

---

(1)  Toute référence dans le présent avis à une personne de sexe masculin s’entend également comme faite à une personne de sexe féminin, et vice versa.

1

---