alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ex_262609.htm


 


Exhibit 10.65


 


SECOND AMENDMENT TO 


AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


This Second Amendment (“Amendment”) to the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement by and between Natural Alternatives International, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Company”), and Mark LeDoux (“Employee”), dated effective as of October 1, 2015 and previously amended September 18, 2020, (“Agreement”), is made and entered into effective as of July 1, 2021. Unless otherwise defined herein, capitalized terms shall have the meanings given them in the Agreement.


 


1.          Pursuant to Section 4. a., of the Agreement Employee’s base salary is hereby increased to Four Hundred Seventy-Five Thousand dollars ($475,000) per year effective as of July 1, 2021.


 


2.         Sub-section 5. b. is amended such that upon Employee's delivery to the Company of an executed Release, Employee shall be entitled to not only a severance benefit in the amount of one (1) year's base salary, but also one year of continuing group health insurance coverage pursuant to COBRA paid for by the Company for the one year period.


 


2.         Sub-section 5 d. is hereby modified and replaced so it reads as follows, "Resignation or Retirement. This Agreement shall be terminated upon Employee’s voluntary retirement or resignation, and no severance benefit shall be due to Employee if Employee resigns or retires from employment at any time for other than Good Reason. “Good Reason” means a voluntary resignation that occurs not more than 90 days following the initial existence of one or more of the following conditions arising without the Employee’s consent, and the Company after receiving written notice thereof has not within 30 days of such notice cured one or more of the following conditions: (i) a material diminution in the Employee’s authority, duties, or responsibilities; (ii) a requirement that the Employee report to someone other than the Board of Directors; (iv) a material change in the geographic location at which the Employee must perform the services and/or (v) any other action or inaction that constitutes a material breach by the Company of this Agreement. In the event Employee resigns for Good Reason the amount, time and form of severance payment made because of a termination of employment under this Section 5 shall be the same as a payment made following a termination without Cause pursuant to sub-section 5. b."


 


Except as set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.


 


 


signatures on following page


 



1




 




 


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment as of July 8, 2021.


 


EMPLOYEE


 


 


 


 


	/s/ Mark A. LeDoux	 
	Mark A. LeDoux	 



           


 


COMPANY


 


Natural Alternatives International, Inc.,


a Delaware corporation


 


 


	/s/ Kenneth E. Wolf	 
	Kenneth E. Wolf, President	 



                  


 





2
March 5, 2014

Mr. Kenneth S. Gray

Director of Operations

Executive Flightways Inc.

One Clark Drive

Ronkonkoma, NY 11779

Dear Mr. Gray:

This is in response to your January 15 letter sent to the public docket No. FAA-2014-0075

petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration on behalf of Executive Flightways Inc. 

(Executive) for an exemption to eliminate the six month trial period to add the iPad Mini and 

iPad Air computing devices as your approved Electronic Flight Bag (EFB).

Upon review, we have determined that an exemption from Federal Aviation Regulations may

not be the appropriate route to obtain the relief you seek. If you disagree, the information you 

sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider 

your petition for exemption, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of 

the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it 

would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the 

exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule 

from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.
2

The relief you seek is covered under FAA Order 8900.1, FAA Advisory Circular (AC) 120-

76A, and FAA AC 91-78. The exemption process is not extended to orders and guidance

material. Instead, we believe your request should be directed to your Principal Operations 

Inspector (POI) for authorization to add other computing devices to your EFB. A copy of 

Information for Operators (InFO 11011) is also enclosed for your information.

If we do not receive the information requested above within the next 30 days, we will take no 

further action on your petition. 

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda D. Courtney

Manager, Aircraft and Airport Rules Division

Enclosures

Information for Operators, InFO 11011

§ 11.81 
3

Project No.: AXX-xx-xxx-E

Project Officer: _______________

ARM-104:TAdams:xx/xx/xx:Doc#xxxx

ARM-1/100/104:Program Office [or specific OPR routing symbol]

[Insert Stylewriter Score Here]

[INSERT ENVELOPE ADDRESS HERE]
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 53 (Wednesday, March 19, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 12990]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6901]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. ER97-1248-000]


Wasatch Energy Corporation; Notice of Issuance of Order

March 14, 1997.
    Wasatch Energy Corporation (Wasatch) submitted for filing a rate 
schedule under which Wasatch will engage in wholesale electric power 
and energy transactions as a marketer. Wasatch also requested waiver of 
various Commission regulations. In particular, Wasatch requested that 
the Commission grant blanket approval under 18 CFR Part 34 of all 
future issuances of securities and assumptions of liability by Wasatch.
    On March 10, 1997, pursuant to delegated authority, the Director, 
Division of Applications, Office of Electric Power Regulation, granted 
requests for blanket approval under Part 34, subject to the following:
    Within thirty days of the date of the order, any person desiring to 
be heard or to protest the blanket approval of issuances of securities 
or assumptions of liability by Wasatch should file a motion to 
intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 
First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rules 
211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 
385.211 and 385.214).
    Absent a request for hearing within this period, Wasatch is 
authorized to issue securities and assume obligations or liabilities as 
a guarantor, endorser, surety, or otherwise in respect of any security 
of another person; provided that such issuance or assumption is for 
some lawful object within the corporate purposes of the applicant, and 
compatible with the public interest, and is reasonably necessary or 
appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that 
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by 
continued approval of Wasatch's issuances of securities or assumptions 
of liability.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is April 9, 1997. Copies of 
the full text of the order are available from the Commission's Public 
Reference Branch, 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20426.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-6901 Filed 3-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 51 (Monday, March 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 12605]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6600]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Public Information Collection Requirement

AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

ACTION: Notice of intent to renew information collection #3038-0046--
risk assessment for holding company systems.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commodity Futures Trading Commission is planning to renew 
information collection 3038-0046, Risk Assessment for Holding Company 
Systems, which is due to expire on May 31, 1997. The information 
collected enhances the Commission's financial surveillance program by 
providing access to information concerning the activities of affiliates 
of registered futures commission merchants (FCMs). The rules require 
registered FCM's to maintain certain records concerning the financial 
activities of such material affiliates, to file certain information 
with the Commission and to provide additional information to the 
Commission upon the occurrence of specified events. In compliance with 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the Commission solicits comments 
to:

    (1) Evaluate whether the collection of information is necessary 
for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including 
the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (2) evaluate 
the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the 
collection of information including the validity of the methodology 
and assumptions used; (3) enhance the quality, utility, and clarity 
of the information to be collected; and (4) minimize the burden of 
the collection of the information on those who are to respond, 
including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, 
mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other 
forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic 
submission of responses.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before May 16, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Persons wishing to comment on this information collection 
should contact the CFTC Clearance Officer, 1155 21st Street NW, 
Washington, DC 20581, (202) 418-5160.
    Title: Risk Assessment for Holding Company Systems.
    Control Number: 3038-0046.
    Action: Extension.
    Respondents: FCMs, IBs.
    Estimated Annual Burden: 1524 hours.

    Issued in Washington, D.C. on March 11, 1997.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 97-6600 Filed 3-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.1

     CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350

I, Bruce M. Goldberg, President and Chief Executive Officer of All American
Semiconductor, Inc., hereby certify, to my knowledge:

         (1)   that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of All American
               Semiconductor, Inc. for the quarterly period ended on June 30,
               2003 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
               date hereof at File No. 0-16207 (the "Report") fully complies
               with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,
               of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)   that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
               all material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of All American Semiconductor, Inc.

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.

Dated:  August 12, 2003                       /s/ Bruce M. Goldberg
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                              Bruce M. Goldberg
May	26,	2015

The	Honorable	Anthony	Foxx

Secretary	of	Transportation

U.S.	Department	of	Transportation

1200	New	Jersey	Ave.,	SE

Washington,	DC	20590

Docket	#	DOT-OST-2015-0082

The	Honorable	Penny	S.	Pritzker

Secretary	of	Commerce

U.S.	Department	of	Commerce

1401	Constitution	Ave.,	NW

Washington,	DC	20230

Docket	#	DOC-2015-0001

The	Honorable	John	Kerry

Secretary	of	State

U.S.	Department	of	State

2201	C	St.,	NW

Washington,	DC	20520

Docket	#	DOS-2015-0016

Dear	Honorable	Sirs	and	Madam:

On	behalf	of	the	Virginia	India	Business	Roundtable,	please	allow	me	to	register	our	

concerns	about	recent	threats	to	Open	Skies	agreements,	which	the	U.S.	has	negotiated	

with	100	countries.	Our	organization	believes	that	the	protectionist	intentions	of	several	

domestic	carriers	threatens	the	integrity	of	the	entire	policy,	and	with	it	the	global	

competition	in	air	travel	that	delivers	billions	in	traveler	benefits.

Open	Skies	is	an	important	free	trade	policy.	For	decades,	such	agreements	have	opened	

foreign	destinations	to air	travel,	without	government	regulation	of	routes,	pricing,	or	

carrier operations.	The	policy	has	been	a	resounding	success.	Competition	under	Open	

Skies	has	helped	expand	consumer	choice	and	controlled	fares.	It	is	upsetting	to	think	that	

the	U.S.	would now	reconsider	this	approach	based	solely	on	the	self-interest	of	three	

airlines.

Virginia residents	of	Indian	descent	have	benefited	from Open	Skies.	Many	of	us	fly	on	Gulf	

States	airlines.	In	some	cases,	the	choice	is	driven	by	cost-savings,	but	often	it	is	the	more	

direct	routes,	fewer	connections,	or	truly	impressive	amenities	that	are	available.	These	
airlines	offer	many	welcome	alternatives	to	connections	in	Mumbai	and	Delhi,	and	this	

factor	alone	has	attracted	many	Indian-American	business	travelers and	tourists.

The	motivation	of	the	big	U.S.	carriers in	attacking	Open	Skies	is clear:	Gulf	States	airlines	

are	beating	them	in	fair,	head-to-head	competition,	and	it’s	not	by	simply	undercutting	

them	on	price.	Rather	than	rising to	the	challenge,	the	major	U.S.	airlines would	prefer	the	

U.S.	government	to	bail	them	out by	reworking	Open	Skies	to	their	specifications.	The	

Virginia	India	Business	Roundtable	believes	such	interventionism	aligns	neither	with	

American	values	nor	the	country’s	best	interests.

A	thriving air	travel market	is	good	for	travelers,	international	tourism,	and	the	economy.	

We	should	not	close	our	airports	off	from	high-quality	foreign	carriers	at	the	behest	of	

three	airlines	that	already	enjoy	a	dominant	market	share	and	are	in	no	need	of	

government	assistance.

In	summary,	let	me	relate	a	tenet	that	hundreds	of	years	of	history	has	borne	out:	

protectionism	does	not	work;	free	trade	does.	We	encourage	your	agency	to	reject	

proposals	reverse	progress	by	intervening	unnecessarily	in	Open	Skies.	

Sincerely,

Kishore	S.	Thota

Chairman

Virginia	India	Business	Roundtable
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000818675
<NAME> EVANS ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         222,386
<SECURITIES>                                   350,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,841,595
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    481,543
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,772,062
<PP&E>                                         772,675
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,101,789
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,267,367
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         14
<COMMON>                                        54,114
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,606,283
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,101,789
<SALES>                                      8,567,520
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,567,520
<CGS>                                        5,688,409
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,807,701
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             135,130
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (375,011)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (375,011)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (151,766)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (526,777)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8986 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

120 4th Street in Petaluma, California, as the ‘‘Lynn C. Woolsey Post 

Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 16, 2020 

Mr. HUFFMAN (for himself, Mr. LAMALFA, Mr. GARAMENDI, Mr. MCCLINTOCK, Mr. THOMPSON of California, Ms. MATSUI, Mr. BERA, Mr. 

MCNERNEY, Mr. HARDER of California, Mr. DESAULNIER, Ms. PELOSI, 

Ms. LEE of California, Ms. SPEIER, Mr. SWALWELL of California, Mr. 

COSTA, Mr. KHANNA, Ms. ESHOO, Ms. LOFGREN, Mr. PANETTA, Mr. 

COX of California, Mr. NUNES, Mr. MCCARTHY, Mr. CARBAJAL, Mr. 

GARCIA of California, Ms. BROWNLEY of California, Ms. JUDY CHU of 

California, Mr. SCHIFF, Mr. CA ́RDENAS, Mr. SHERMAN, Mr. AGUILAR, 

Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Mr. TED LIEU of California, Mr. GOMEZ, Mrs. 

TORRES of California, Mr. RUIZ, Ms. BASS, Ms. SA ́NCHEZ, Mr. 

CISNEROS, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, Mr. TAKANO, Mr. CALVERT, Ms. 

WATERS, Ms. BARRAGA ́N, Ms. PORTER, Mr. CORREA, Mr. LOWENTHAL, 

Mr. ROUDA, Mr. LEVIN of California, Mr. VARGAS, Mr. PETERS, and 

Mrs. DAVIS of California) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 120 4th Street in Petaluma, California, as 

the ‘‘Lynn C. Woolsey Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8986 IH

1 SECTION 1. LYNN C. WOOLSEY POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 120 4th Street in Petaluma, Cali4 fornia, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Lynn C. 

5 Woolsey Post Office Building’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Lynn C. Woolsey Post 

10 Office Building’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 51 (Monday, March 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 12644]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6666]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY
[FEMA-1164-DR]


Ohio; Major Disaster and Related Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for the State of Ohio (FEMA-1164-DR), dated March 4, 1997, and 
related determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 4, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3260.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that, in a letter 
dated March 4, 1997, the President declared a major disaster under the 
authority of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency 
Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.), as follows:

    I have determined that the damage in certain areas of the State 
of Ohio, resulting from severe storms and flooding beginning on 
February 28, 1997, and continuing, is of sufficient severity and 
magnitude to warrant a major disaster declaration under the Robert 
T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (''the 
Stafford Act''). I, therefore, declare that such a major disaster 
exists in the State of Ohio.
    In order to provide Federal assistance, you are hereby 
authorized to allocate from funds available for these purposes, such 
amounts as you find necessary for Federal disaster assistance and 
administrative expenses.
    You are authorized to provide Individual Assistance in the 
designated areas. Public Assistance and Hazard Mitigation may be 
provided at a later date, if warranted. Consistent with the 
requirement that Federal assistance be supplemental, any Federal 
funds provided under the Stafford Act for Public Assistance or 
Hazard Mitigation will be limited to 75 percent of the total 
eligible costs.

    The time period prescribed for the implementation of section 
310(a), Priority to Certain Applications for Public Facility and Public 
Housing Assistance, 42 U.S.C. 5153, shall be for a period not to exceed 
six months after the date of this declaration.
    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the authority vested in the 
Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency under Executive 
Order 12148, I hereby appoint David A. Skarosi of the Federal Emergency 
Management Agency to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this 
declared disaster.
    I do hereby determine the following areas of the State of Ohio to 
have been affected adversely by this declared major disaster:

Adams, Athens, Brown, Gallia, Hocking, Jackson, Lawrence, Meigs, 
Monroe, Pike, Ross, Scioto, Vinton and Washington Counties for 
Individual Assistance.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 83.516, Disaster 
Assistance)
James L. Witt,
Director.
[FR Doc. 97-6666 Filed 3-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P