alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-02-1996
<CASH>                                             275
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,102
<ALLOWANCES>                                       200
<INVENTORY>                                     29,762
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                40,682
<PP&E>                                          22,784
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,305
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  56,944
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,439
<BONDS>                                         10,520
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            5,436
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      34,705
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    56,944
<SALES>                                         76,310
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                76,310
<CGS>                                           49,258
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   49,258
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                22,958
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 214
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,880
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,552
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,328
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,328
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.2
 
                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
  We consent to the inclusion in this registration statement on Form S-1 (File
No. 333-     ) (i) of our report dated September 5, 1997, on our audits of the
financial statements and financial statement schedule of Looney & Company,
(ii) of our report dated August 15, 1997 of our audits of the financial
statements of Klein, Bury & Associates, (iii) of our report dated September 4,
1997, of our audits of the financial statements of G&G Court Reporters, (iv)
of our report dated September 19, 1997, of our audit of the financial
statements of San Francisco Reporting Service, (v) of our report dated
September 5, 1997, of our audits of the financial statements of Legal
Enterprise, Inc., (vi) of our report dated August 29, 1997, of our audits of
the financial statements of Elaine P. Dine, Inc., (vii) of our report dated
September 5, 1997, of our audits of the financial statements of Burton House,
Inc. d.b.a. Ziskind, Greene, Watanabe, & Nason, (viii) of our report dated
September 5, 1997 of our audits of the financial statements of Jilio &
Associates, (ix) of our report dated August 29, 1997, except as to the
information presented in Notes 4 and 6, for which the date is September 12,
1997, of our audits of the financial statements of Reporting Service
Associates, Inc., (x) of our report dated August 29, 1997, of our audits of
the financial statements of Kirby A. Kennedy & Associates, (xi) of our report
dated September 19, 1997 of our audits of the financial statements of Johnson
Court Reporting Group, (xii) of our report dated September 17, 1997, of our
audit of the financial statements of Amicus One Legal Support Services, Inc.,
(xiii) of our report dated September 17, 1997 of our audits of the financial
statements of Block Court Reporting, Inc., and (xiv) of our report dated
September 22, 1997, of our audits of the financial statements of Commander
Wilson, Inc. We also consent to the references to our firm under the caption
"Experts."
 
                                          COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
 
Houston, Texas
September 26, 1997
No. 11-10755.

#### Strickland *v.*RRR Bowie, LLC.

Cir. Ct. Prince George’s County, Md. Certiorari denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 970 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 970

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 11, 2020

    Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To direct the Secretary of the Interior to develop a plan for the 
   removal of the monument to Robert E. Lee at the Antietam National 
                  Battlefield, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Robert E. Lee Statue Removal Act''.

SEC. 2. REMOVAL AND DISPOSAL OF MONUMENT.

    Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this 
Act, the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Director of the 
National Park Service, shall remove and appropriately dispose of the 
Monument to General Robert E. Lee at the Antietam National Battlefield.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 10, 2020.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### COM. v. SHOWALTER, L.

1049 WDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/08/2017

CP-05-CR-0000132-2013

(Bedford)

Affirmed
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 22

                         Independent Auditors' Consent

The Board of Trustees and Shareholders
of Archstone Communities Trust:

We consent to incorporation by reference in registration statements No. 333-
43723 (Form S-8), No. 333-60847 (Form S-8), No. 333-60815 (Form S-8), No. 333-
60817 (Form S-8), No. 333-44639 (Form S-3), No. 333-68591 (Form S-3) and No.
333-51139 (Form S-4) of Archstone Communities Trust of our reports dated January
22, 1999, except as to Note 15 which is as of March 5, 1999, relating to the
balance sheets of Archstone Communities Trust as of December 31, 1998 and 1997,
and the related statements of earnings, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1998, and the
related schedule, which reports appear in the December 31, 1998 annual report on
Form 10-K of Archstone Communities Trust.


KPMG LLP
Chicago, Illinois
January 22, 1999, except as to Note 15,
which is as  of March 5, 1999
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No.s 333-76570, 333-76080, 333-96047, 333-96045, and
333-47422) and on Form S-3 (No.s 333-66088, 333-47532, 333-32036, and 333-46634)
of Dynegy Inc. of our report dated April 9, 2003 relating to the financial
statements and financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Houston, Texas
April 11, 2003
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 42 (Tuesday, March 4, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9766-9767]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5348]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

[CC Docket No. 92-237]


Change in Time for March 11, 1997 Meeting of the North American 
Numbering Council

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On February 27, 1997, the Commission released a public notice 
announcing a change in the time for the March 11 meeting of the North 
American Numbering Council (NANC). The March 11 meeting and its agenda 
had been announced in a public notice published in the Federal Register 
on February 26, 1997 (See 62 FR 8741). The intended effect of this 
action is to make the public aware that the time of the March 11 NANC 
meeting has changed from 9:30 A.M. EST, to 8:30 A.M. EST.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Linda Simms, Administrative Assistant 
of the NANC, (202) 418-2330. The address is: Network Services Division, 
Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 2000 M 
Street, NW, Suite 235, Washington, D.C. 20054. The fax number is: (202) 
418-2345. The TTY number is: (202) 418-0484.


[[Page 9767]]



SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Released: February 27, 1997. The FCC, in 
a Public Notice released February 21, 1997, and published in the 
Federal Register on February 26, 1997 (See 62 FR 8741), announced 
the March 11, 1997 meeting of the North American Numbering Council 
(NANC) and the agenda for this meeting. The Public Notice stated 
that the NANC meeting would commence at 9:30 A.M EST. The NANC has 
changed the meeting time to 8:30 A.M. EST. The meeting place, the 
Federal Communications Commission, 1919 M Street, NW, Room 856, 
Washington, DC, remains the same.

Federal Communications Commission.
Geraldine A. Matise,
Chief, Network Services Division, Common Carrier Bureau.
[FR Doc. 97-5348 Filed 3-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
No. 11-10416.

#### Freeman *v.*Voorhies, Warden, et al.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-10133.

#### Johnson *v.*Texas.

Ct. App. Tex., 4th Dist. Certiorari denied.
# C_2022257EN.01004001.xml

| 4.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 257/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 257/40

---

Action brought on 13 May 2022 — PSCC 2012 v EUIPO — Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide (LA BOTTEGA W)

(Case T-265/22)

(2022/C 257/52)

Language in which the application was lodged: Italian

Parties

Applicant: PSCC 2012 Srl (Rome, Italy) (represented by: P. Alessandrini and E. Montelione, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide LLC (Bethesda, Maryland, United States)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark LA BOTTEGA W — EU trade mark No 11 592 581

Proceedings before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 February 2022 in Case R 621/2019-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul and vary the contested decision and reject the application for cancellation of the mark LA BOTTEGA W; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul and vary the contested decision and reject the application for cancellation of the mark LA BOTTEGA W;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Articles 60 and 8 of Regulation (EU) No 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Articles 60 and 8 of Regulation (EU) No 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

| — | Infringement of Article 42 of the Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 42 of the Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal.

| — | Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-22-00377-CR

Jose Andres ROMERO,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Gillespie County, Texas

Trial Court No. 7292

Honorable Albert D. Pattillo, III, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE WATKINS, JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ, AND JUSTICE VALENZUELA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. 

SIGNED October 19, 2022.

_________________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice
No. 11-10644.

#### Gouveia *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF BRAD RAGAN, INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             682
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   69,771
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,050
<INVENTORY>                                     39,692
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               115,016
<PP&E>                                           8,887
<DEPRECIATION>                                  22,068
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 127,330
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           75,456
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,191
<OTHER-SE>                                      44,547
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   127,330
<SALES>                                        238,473
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               251,999
<CGS>                                          165,921
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  249,307
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,832
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,648
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,504
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (4,644)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (1,735)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2,909)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2,909)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (1.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.33)
        

</TABLE>
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02

- 22

- 00317

- CV

___________________________

Original Proceeding

17th District Court of Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 017

- 307531

- 19

Before Sudderth, C.J. ; Bassel and Wallac h , JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### I N RE 

### A NIL 

### K

UMAR 

### K

ESANI



### , M.D. , Relator2 MEMORANDUM OPINION

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandam us and is of the

opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of

mandamus is denied.

Per Curiam

Delivered : August 11, 2022
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 41 (Monday, March 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9434-9435]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5071]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Health Resources and Services Administration


Advisory Council; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Public Law 92-463), announcement is made of the 
following National Advisory body scheduled to meet during the month of 
December 1996:

    Name: National Advisory Council on Nurse Education and Practice
    Date and Time: April 17-18, 1997, 8:30 a.m.

[[Page 9435]]

    Place: Spring Room, Silver Spring Holiday Inn, 8777 Georgia 
Avenue, Silver Spring, Maryland 20910.
    The meeting is open to the public with the exception of the 
period from approximately 8:30 a.m. until 9:30 a.m. on April 18, 
when grant applications will be reviewed.
    Agenda: Updates on and discussion of Agency, Bureau and Division 
activities, and the legislative and budget status of programs; 
overview of the national nursing workforce; review of nurse 
practitioner workforce trends, implications and options for the 
future; review of nursing informatics workgroup recommendations for 
a national agenda.
    Anyone wishing to obtain a roster of members, minutes of meeting 
or other relevant information should write or contact Ms. Elaine G. 
Cohen, Acting Executive Secretary, National Advisory Council on 
Nurse Education and Practice, Health Resources and Services 
Administration, Parklawn Building, Room 9-36, 5600 Fishers Lane, 
Rockville, Maryland 20857, Telephone (301) 443-5786.
    Agenda Items are subject to change as priorities dictate.

    Dated: February 25, 1997.
J. Henry Montes,
Director, Office of Policy and Information Coordination, HRSA.
[FR Doc. 97-5071 Filed 2-28-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-15-P
# C_2022451EN.01001001.xml

| 28.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 451/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 451/10

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Cluj (Romania) lodged on 9 August 2022 — Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice Cluj-Napoca, Administrația Județeană a Finanțelor Publice Cluj v SC Westside Unicat

(Case C-532/22)

(2022/C 451/13)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Curtea de Apel Cluj

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice Cluj-Napoca, Administrația Județeană a Finanțelor Publice Cluj

Defendant: SC Westside Unicat

Questions referred

| 1. | Is Article 53 of the VAT Directive (1) to be interpreted as applying to services of the type at issue in this dispute, which is to say services provided by a video chat studio to a website operator, consisting in interactive sessions of an erotic nature filmed and transmitted in real [time] via the Internet (live streaming of digital content)? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is Article 53 of the VAT Directive (1) to be interpreted as applying to services of the type at issue in this dispute, which is to say services provided by a video chat studio to a website operator, consisting in interactive sessions of an erotic nature filmed and transmitted in real [time] via the Internet (live streaming of digital content)?

| 2. | In the event that the first question is answered in the affirmative, then, for the purposes of interpreting the phrase ‘the place where those events actually take place’, appearing in Article 53 of the VAT Directive, is the place where the performers appear in front of the webcam relevant, or the place where the organiser of the sessions is established, or the place where customers see the images, or should some other place be taken into account? |
| --- | --- |

2.

In the event that the first question is answered in the affirmative, then, for the purposes of interpreting the phrase ‘the place where those events actually take place’, appearing in Article 53 of the VAT Directive, is the place where the performers appear in front of the webcam relevant, or the place where the organiser of the sessions is established, or the place where customers see the images, or should some other place be taken into account?

---

(1)  Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1).

---
# C_2022424EN.01002001.xml

| 7.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 424/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 424/20

---

Appeal brought on 25 May 2022 by Laboratorios Ern, SA against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 16 March 2022 in Case T-315/21, Laboratorios Ern v EUIPO — Nordesta (APIAL)

(Case C-342/22 P)

(2022/C 424/25)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Laboratorios Ern, SA (represented by: I. Miralles Llorca, abogada)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), Nordesta GmbH

By order of 28 September 2022, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) held that the appeal was not allowed to proceed and that Laboratorios Ern, SA should bear its own costs.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000818257
<NAME> JOHN HANCOCK REALTY INCOME FUND-II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       3,354,593
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   88,139
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,442,732
<PP&E>                                      19,258,208
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,112,080
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              28,744,779
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          311,921
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  28,432,858
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                28,744,779
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,660,270
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  370,137
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               350,720
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                939,413
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            939,413
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   939,413
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.36
        

</TABLE>
No. 11-10427.

#### Adams *v.*Hart, Warden.

Super. Ct. Ware County, Ga. Certiorari denied.