alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2023007EN.01001901.xml

| 9.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 7/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 7/19

---

Appeal brought on 8 November 2022 by Methanol Holdings (Trinidad) Ltd against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 14 September 2022 in Case T-744/19, Methanol Holdings (Trinidad) v Commission

(Case C-688/22 P)

(2023/C 7/23)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Methanol Holdings (Trinidad) Ltd (represented by: B. Servais, and V. Crochet, avocats)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission, Achema AB, Grupa Azoty S.A., Grupa Azoty Zakłady Azotowe Puławy S.A.

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:

| — | set aside the judgment under appeal; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the judgment under appeal;

| — | accept the application at first instance; and |
| --- | --- |

—

accept the application at first instance; and

| — | order the Commission and any intervening party to pay the costs including those incurred at first instance;
  or alternatively |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission and any intervening party to pay the costs including those incurred at first instance;

or alternatively

| — | refer the case back to the General Court for reconsideration; and |
| --- | --- |

—

refer the case back to the General Court for reconsideration; and

| — | reserve the costs of the proceedings at first instance and on appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

reserve the costs of the proceedings at first instance and on appeal.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the appeal, the appellant relies on two grounds of appeal.

First, the General Court misinterpreted the rules of Articles 3(2), 3(3) and 9(4) of the Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union (1) (the ‘Basic Regulation’) when defining the export price for the purpose of the undercutting and underselling margins calculation in case of exports to the European Union through related entities and, as a result, erroneously concluded that the Commission did not violate Articles 3(1), 3(2), 3(3), 3(5) to 3(8) and 9(4) of the Basic Regulation.

Second, the General Court misconstrued the arguments put forth by Methanol Holdings (Trinidad) Limited in the Reply regarding the Commission’s price depression and price suppression analysis and, as a result, mistakenly declared them inadmissible.

---

(1)  OJ 2016 L 176, p. 21.

---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 47 (Tuesday, March 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 11155]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6041]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Decision on 
Application for Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Instrument

    This decision is made pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, 
Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-
651, 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). Related records can be viewed 
between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. in Room 4211, U.S. Department of Commerce, 
14th and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, D.C.
    Docket Number: 96-116. Applicant: Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention, Mailstop F17, 4770 Buford Hwy, N.E., Atlanta, GA 30341-
3724. Instrument: Mass Spectrometer, Model VG AutoSpec. Manufacturer: 
Micromass, Ltd., United Kingdom. Intended Use: See notice at 61 FR 
66017, December 18, 1996.
    Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. No instrument of 
equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument, for such 
purposes as it is intended to be used, is being manufactured in the 
United States. Reasons: The foreign instrument provides: (1) High 
sensitivity and resolving power, continuously variable to 80 000 (10% 
valley definition) in El mode and (2) extended mass range to 2000 at 
8keV accelerating potential. The National Institutes of Health advises 
in its memorandum dated November 25, 1996 that (1) these capabilities 
are pertinent to the applicant's intended purpose and (2) it knows of 
no domestic instrument or apparatus of equivalent scientific value to 
the foreign instrument for the applicant's intended use.
    We know of no other instrument or apparatus of equivalent 
scientific value to the foreign instrument which is being manufactured 
in the United States.
Frank W. Creel,
Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff.
[FR Doc. 97-6041 Filed 3-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
#### IN the INTEREST OF: L.S.A.C., Minor

515 EDA 2017

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/27/2017

CP-51-AP-0001220-2016

(Philadelphia)

Affirmed — Application to Withdraw as Counsel Granted
<PAGE>
 
    
     [LETTERHEAD FOR NAIL MCKINNEY PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION APPEARS HERE]

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

Pontotoc BancShares Corp.
P.O. Box 29
Pontotoc, Mississippi 38863

    
                                                                   June 25, 1997

We consent to the use of the audited financial statements for the years ended 
December 31, 1996 and 1995, the compiled financial statements for the quarters 
ended March 31, 1997 and 1996, and the pro forma financial statements for the 
year ended December 31, 1996 together with our reports thereon in Amendment 
No. 2 to the registration statement on Form S-4 of Pontotoc BancShares Corp.
     

Very truly yours,

/s/ JAMES RAY DAVIS, JR.

James Ray Davis, Jr.
Certified Public Accountant
EXHIBIT 18.1


PNM Resources Inc.
Alvarado Square
Albuquerque, NM 87158

Dear Sirs/Madams:


We have audited the consolidated financial statements of PNM Resources Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and for each of the three years
in the period ended December 31, 2003, included in your Annual Report on Form
10-K to the Securities and Exchange Commission and have issued our report
thereon dated March 8, 2004, which expresses an unqualified opinion and includes
an explanatory paragraph referring to the adoption of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations and
your change in measurement dates used to account for your pensions and other
post-retirement benefits from September 30 to December 31. Note 9 to such
consolidated financial statements contains a description of your change in
measurement dates used to account for your pensions and other post-retirement
benefits from September 30 to December 31. In our judgment, such change is to an
alternative accounting principle that is preferable under the circumstances.

Yours truly,


/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


Omaha, NE
March 8, 2004
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Ex Parte Dustin Wayne Glenn

Appellate case number: 01-14-00195-CR

Trial court case number: CV-70369

Trial court: County Court at Law No. 3 of Galveston County

Appellant, Dustin Wayne Glen, has filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s denial of 

his application for writ of habeas corpus. The trial court’s “Findings and Order” indicates that the 

court considered “the transcript and exhibits from Dustin Wayne Glenn v. State cause numbers 

12CR2237 and 12CR2238 motion for new trial hearing held in the 405th District Court in 

September 2013 . . . .” Accordingly, we direct the Clerk of this Court to copy the supplemental 

reporter’s record of the September 9, 2013 motion for new trial hearing, filed in this Court on 

November 22, 2013 in cause numbers 01-13-00640-CR and 01-13-00641-CR, and file the copy

in cause number 01-14-00195-CR.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Terry Jennings

 

Date: October 28, 2014
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 47 (Tuesday, March 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 11252]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6042]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of Thrift Supervision
[AC-4; OTS No. 03917]


Peoples Federal Savings and Loan Association of Sidney, Sidney, 
Ohio; Approval of Conversion Application

    Notice is hereby given that on February 26, 1997, the Director, 
Corporate Activities, Office of Thrift Supervision, or her designee, 
acting pursuant to delegated authority, approved the application of 
Peoples Federal Savings and Loan Association of Sidney, Sidney, Ohio, 
to convert to the stock form of organization. Copies of the application 
are available for inspection at the Dissemination Branch, Office of 
Thrift Supervision, 1700 G Street, NW., Washington, DC 20552, and the 
Central Regional Office, Office of Thrift Supervision, 200 West Madison 
Street, Suite 1300, Chicago, Illinois 60606.

    Dated: March 6, 1997.

    By the Office of Thrift Supervision.
Nadine Y. Washington,
Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-6042 Filed 3-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6720-01-M
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION****Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906****Of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each ofthe undersigned officers of Rand Capital Corporation (the“Company”), does hereby certify, to suchofficer’s knowledge, that:     The Annual Report onForm 10-K for thefiscal year ended December 31, 2005 (theForm 10-K) of theCompany fully complies with the requirement ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 and the information contained in theForm 10-K fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.Dated: March 24, 2006
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 49 (Thursday, March 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11900-11901]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6361]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
[Docket No. 96N-0283]


Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of OMB 
Approval

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a 
collection of information regarding Regulations under the Federal 
Import Milk Act, has been approved by the Office of Management and 
Budget (OMB), under the Paperwork Reduction

[[Page 11901]]

Act of 1995. This document announces the OMB approval number.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Margaret R. Wolff, Office of 
Information Resources Management (HFA-250), Food and Drug 
Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, rm. 16B-19, Rockville, MD 20857, 
301-827-1223.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of September 24, 
1996 (61 FR 50030), the agency announced that the proposed information 
collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance. In 
accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520), OMB has approved the information collection and assigned OMB 
control number 0910-0212. The approval expires on October 31, 1999. 
Under 5 CFR 1320.5(b), an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a 
person is not required to respond to, a collection of information 
unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.

    Dated: March 5, 1997.
William K. Hubbard,
Associate Commissioner for Policy Coordination.
[FR Doc. 97-6361 Filed 3-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
Exhibit 32

Certification of Chief Executive Officer  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned
officer of Alliance HealthCare Services, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:



Dated: November 5, 2009

/s/ PAUL S. VIVIANO Paul S. Viviano Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer


---



Certification of Chief Financial Officer  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned
officer of Alliance HealthCare Services, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:



Dated: November 5, 2009

/s/ HOWARD K. AIHARA Howard K. Aihara Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
#### Walfre Rafael Sis CHOCOJ, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 13-73830

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*628Submitted February 13, 2018 *

Filed February 22, 2018

Smirna Ayala, Attorney, Law Offices of Ronzio & Associates, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner

Manuel Palau, Nancy Naseem Safavi, Trial Attorney, DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office' of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent

Before: LEAVY, FERNANDEZ, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed, R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Walfre Rafael Sis Chocoj, a native and citizen of'Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“U”) decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. *Zehatye v.*Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir. 2006). We dismiss in part and deny the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to consider Sis Cho-coj’s asylum claim where he failed to exhaust any challenge the IJ’s determination that his asylum application was untimely. *See Barron v. Ashcroft,*358 F.3d 674, 677-78 (9th Cir. 2004) (petitioner must exhaust issues or claims in administrative proeeed-ings below). Thus, we dismiss the petition for review as to Sis Chocoj’s asylum claim.

As to Sis Chocoj’s withholding claim, we lack jurisdiction to review the social group claim raised for the first time in the opening brief because he did not exhaust it before the BIA, *See id.*Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Sis Chocoj failed to demonstrate a nexus between the harm he suffered and fears and a protected ground. *See Zetino v. Holder,*622 F.3d 1007, 1016 (9th Cir. 2010) (applicant’s “desire to be free from harassment by criminals motivated by theft or random violence by gang members bears no nexus to a protected ground”); *see also Molina-Morales v. INS,*237 F.3d 1048, 1052 (9th Cir. 2001) (harm based on personal retribution is not persecution on account of a protected ground). Thus, we deny the petition for review as to Sis Chocoj’s withholding claim.

In Sis Chocoj’s opening brief, he does not make any arguments challenging the agency’s dispositive conclusion that he failed to demonstrate that he would be tortured by or with the consent or acquiescence of the government of Guatemala. *See Martinez-Serrano v. INS,*94 F.3d 1256, 1259 (9th Cir. 1996) (“Issues raised in a brief that are not supported by argument are deemed abandoned.”). Thus, we deny the petition for review as to Sis Chocoj’s CAT claim.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
#### INTEGRATED TECHNOLOGICAL SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. FIRST INTERNET BANK OF INDIANA, Defendant-Appellee

2017-1795

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

February 20, 2018

Matthew Zapadka, Porzio, Bromberg & Newman, PC, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by

Richard J. Oparil, Kevin M. Bell, Scott A.M. Chambers.

Daniel M. Leghleiter, Faegre Baker Daniels LLP, Indianapolis, IN, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by Brian James Paul; Doowon R. Chung, Minneapolis, MN; Justin Dean Schneider, Denver, CO.

(Newman, Lourie, and Dyk, Circuit Judges).

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
No. 11-10552.

#### Melendez-Baez *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 21, 2014

d0319 

# Order

Clerk March 21, 2014

147335(52)

HAROLD HUNTER, JR.,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 147335

COA: 306018

Genesee CC: 10

- 094081

- NI

DAVID SISCO and AUTO CLUB INSURANCE

ASSOCIATION,

Defendants,

and

CITY OF FLINT TRANSPORTATION

DEPARTMENT,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s November

20, 2013 order is considered, and it is GRANTED. We VACATE that part of our

November 20, 2013 order that denied the plaintiff’s application for leave to appeal. On

reconsideration, the application for leave to appeal the April 2, 2013 judgment of the

Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED, limited to whether damages for

pain and suffering and/or emotional distress may qualify as a “bodily injury” that permits

a plaintiff to avoid the application of governmental immunity from tort liab ility under the

motor vehicle exception to governmental immunity, MCL 691.1405 (see Wesche v

Mecosta Co Rd Comm , 480 Mich 75 (2008)).

We direct the Clerk to schedule the oral argument in this case for the same future

session of this Court when it will hear oral argument in Hannay v Dept of Transportation

(Docket No. 146763).

The Michigan Association for Justice, the Michigan Defense Trial Counsel, Inc.,

and the Insurance Institute of Michigan are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other

persons or groups interested in the determination of the issue presented in this case m ay

move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of UST Liquidating Corporation. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending
September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Marc A. Weisman, Co-Chairman of Board of Directors of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ MARC A. WEISMANMarc A. WeismanCo-Chairman of Board of DirectorsNovember 14, 2003






---



##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of UST Liquidating Corporation. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending
September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Barry S. Rosenstein, Co-Chairman of Board of Directors of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ BARRY S. ROSENSTEIN

Barry S. Rosenstein
Co-Chairman of Board of Directors
November 14, 2003
**Exhibit 32.01**

**OFFICER CERTIFICATION**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection withthe Annual Report of PSCo on Form 10-K for the year 2006, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Form 10-K), each of theundersigned officers of the PSCo certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, tosuch officer’s knowledge:

1)           The Form 10-K fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

2)           The informationcontained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of PSCo as of the dates and forthe periods expressed in the Form 10-K.

Date: February 26, 2007
|        | /s/ PATRICIA K. VINCENT                    |
|--------|--------------------------------------------|
|   | Patricia K. Vincent                        |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer      |
|   |                                       |
|   | /s/ BENJAMIN G.S. FOWKE III                |
|   | Benjamin G.S. Fowke III                    |
|   | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

The foregoingcertification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 andis not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appearsin typed form within the electronic version of this written statement requiredby Section 906, has been provided to PSCo and will be retained by PSCo andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
#### David GOULD, Petitioner v. WEISSANG, INC., d/b/a Fishers Pharmacy and Jennifer Leibfreid, Respondents

No. 343 WAL 2017

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

January 9, 2018

*733ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 9th day of January, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.