alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Brian Alleman, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Simtek Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.



Date: August 4, 2006

                                              /s/Brian Alleman
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Brian Alleman
                                              Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of National Housing Trust Limited Partnership (the
Partnership) for the period ending March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Susan E. Basting, Chief Financial Officer of NHT, Inc., general partner of the
Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |  |  |    |  |                      |  |                                           
|------------------ |  |  |  | -- |  | -------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------
|                   |  |  | 
|Date: June 5, 2008 |  |  |  | By |  | /s/ Susan E. Basting
|                   |  |  |  |    |  |                      |  | Susan E. Basting, Treasurer               
|                   |  |  |  |    |  |                      |  | and Chief Financial Officer               
|                   |  |  |  |    |  |                      |  | NHT, Inc., General Partner for            
|                   |  |  |  |    |  |                      |  | National Housing Trust Limited Partnership
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

Reference is hereby made tothat certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of February 1, 2015, byand among GS MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORPORATION II, as Depositor, WELLS FARGOBANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, RIALTO CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC,as Special Servicer, PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC, as Operating Advisor, WELLSFARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator and WILMINGTONTRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates Series 2015-GC28 (the "Agreement").Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meaningsassigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 10.07 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activities ofthe Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2016 through December 31,2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per theAgreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2. To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day ofFebruary 2017.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President 

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|------------------------|------------------------------------|
ALL AMERICAN SEMICONDUCTOR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES                   EXHIBIT 11.1

STATEMENT RE:  COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS (UNAUDITED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                  QUARTERS                NINE MONTHS
PERIODS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30                      2000         1999         2000         1999
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE:
-------------------------
<S>                                       <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>
Net Income ............................   $4,741,000   $  502,000   $8,900,000   $  943,000
                                          ==========   ==========   ==========   ==========

Weighted Average Shares Outstanding ...    3,844,454    3,922,838    3,820,112    3,932,527
                                          ==========   ==========   ==========   ==========

Basic Earnings Per Share ..............        $1.23         $.13        $2.33         $.24
                                               =====         ====        =====         ====

DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE:
---------------------------

Net Income ............................   $4,741,000   $  502,000   $8,900,000   $  943,000
                                          ==========   ==========   ==========   ==========

Weighted Average and Dilutive Shares:
  Weighted average shares outstanding .    3,844,454    3,922,838    3,820,112    3,932,527
  Dilutive shares .....................      450,738           --      320,536           --
                                          ----------   ----------   ----------   ----------
                                           4,295,192    3,922,838    4,140,648    3,932,527
                                          ==========   ==========   ==========   ==========

Diluted Earnings Per Share ............        $1.10         $.13        $2.15         $.24
                                               =====         ====        =====         ====
</TABLE>
#### F. J. Bowen, as Mayor-Commissioner, *et al.,*as members of the City Commission of the City of Punta Gorda, and L. E. Robinson, as City Clerk, as Ex-officio Tax Assessor and as Ex-officio Tax Collector of said City, v. State, *ex rel.*The Guaranty State Bank.

154 So. 834.

Division A.

Opinion Filed May 11, 1934.

*Thomas W. Butler,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Touchton & Crittenden,*for Defendant in Error.

*743Per Curiam.

— Final judgment in mandamus was awarded in the Circuit Court against the officials of the Town of Punta Gorda which is a municipal corporation existing under Chapter 9055, Acts of 1921, Laws of Florida. The plaintiff was a bondholder of the city who sought relief with respect to the enforced payment of certain bonds that had been issued by the town under authority of Chapter 13327, Acts of 1927, and thereafter duly validated by judicial proceedings.

The peremptory writ was properly awarded on the authority of Columbia County v. King, 13 Fla. 451; City of Palmetto v. Klemm, 108 Fla. 455,146 Sou. Rep. 558; Klemm v. Davenport, 100 Fla. 627, 129 Sou. Rep. 904, 70 A. L. R. 156; Rountree v. State, *ex rel.*Georgia Bond & Mtge. Co., 102 Fla. 246, 135 Sou. Rep. 888; State, *ex rel.*Dos Amigos, Inc., v. Lehman, 100 Fla. 1313, 131 Sou. Rep. 533; State, *ex rel.*Rempsen v. Smith, 105 Fla. 368, 141 Sou. Rep. 318; State, *ex rel.*Aldrich v. Mitchell, 108 Fla. 233, 146 Sou. Rep. 207; Humphreys v. State, *ex rel.*Palm Beach Co., 108 Fla. 92, 145 Sou. Rep. 858, so the judgment to which this writ of error was’ taken must be affirmed, and it is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Davis, C. J., and Ellis and Terrell, J. J., concur.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Buford, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.
Transport Transports

Canada Canada TP 7245E



# AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE

The following airworthiness directive (AD) may be applicable to an aircraft which our records indicate is registered in your na me. ADs are issued pursuant to Canadian Aviation Regulation (CAR) 593 . Pursuant to CAR 605.84 and the further details of CAR Standard 625, Appendix H , the continuing airworthiness of a Canadian registered aircraft is contingent upon compliance with all applicable ADs. Failure to comply with the requirements of an AD may invalidat e the flight authorization of the aircraft. Alternative means of compliance shall be applied for in accordance with CAR 605.84 and the above-referenced Standard

. This AD has been issued by the Continuing Airworthiness Division (AARDG), National Aircraft Certification Branch, Transport Can ada, Ottawa, telephone 613 952-4357.

Pursuant to CAR 202.51 the registered owner of a Canadian aircraft shall, within seven days, notify the Minister in writing of any change of his or her name or address.

To request a change of address, contact the Civil Aviation Communica tions Centre (AARC)

at Place de Ville, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0N8 , or 1-800-305-2059

, or www.tc.gc.ca/civilaviation/communications/centre/ address.asp

24-0022 (01-2005) 1/1 No

. CF-2009-41

Issue Date 16 November 2009

Number: CF-2009-41

Subject: Tailboom Attachment Fitting

Effective: 9 December 2009

Applicability: Bell Helicopter Textron Canada (BHTC) Model 206L series helicopters:

206L serial numbers 45004 through 45153 and 46601 through 46617 206L-1 serial numbers 45154 through 45790 206L-3 serial numbers 51001 through 51612

206L-4 all serial numbers.

Compliance: A t the next 100 hours scheduled inspection and with in the 100 hours flight time intervals

thereafter.

Background: A new airworthiness limitation has been introduced for the tailboom upper left attachment fitting Part Number (P/N) 206-032-409-001. T he 100 flight hours/annual inspection of the fitting has been incorporated in Chapter 4 of the applicable Maintenance Manual.

Corrective

Actions: Inspect the tailboom upper left attachment fitting P/N 206-032-409-001, and rectify if required, in accordance with Accomplishment Instructions of Alert Service Bulletin 206L-09-158 Rev. A dated 31 August 2009 or later revisions approved by the Chief, Continuing Airworthiness, Transport Canada.

Incorporation of the following applicable Maintenance Manual revision constitutes terminating action to this directive:

BHT-206L-MM-1, Rev 29, dated 26 May 2009 BHT-206L1-MM-1, Rev 26, dated 26 May 2009 BHT-206L3-MM-1, Rev 9, dated 26 May 2009 BHT-206L4-MM-1, Rev 7, dated 26 May 2009

Authorization: For Minister of Transport, In frastructure and Communities

Derek Ferguson Chief, Continuing Airworthiness

Contact: Mr. Bogdan Gajewski, Continuing Airworthiness, Ottawa, telephone (613) 952-4357, facsimile (613) 996-9178 or e-mail: CAW WEB Feedback@tc.gc.ca or any Transport

Canada Centre
Certification of the Vice President-Finance

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, I, the undersigned Vice President-Finance of
Northland Cranberries, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, based on my
knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter
ended February 28, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Nigel Cooper
------------------------------------
Nigel Cooper
April 14, 2003
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED August 17, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-50394 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus FELIPE MARTIN MORALES-JUAREZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:04-CR-2577-ALL

-------------------- Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Felipe Martin Morales-Juarez raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 48 (Wednesday, March 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 11415]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6177]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Institute of Standards and Technology


Announcing a Meeting of the Computer System Security and Privacy 
Advisory Board

AGENCY: National Institute of Standards and Technology.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App., 
notice is hereby given that the Computer System Security and Privacy 
Advisory Board will meet Monday, March 24 and Tuesday, March 25, 1997 
from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. The Advisory Board was established by the 
Computer Security Act of 1987 (P.L. 100-235) to advise the Secretary of 
Commerce and the Director of NIST on security and privacy issues 
pertaining to Federal computer systems. All sessions will be open to 
the public.

DATES: The meeting will be held on March 24 and 25, 1997, from 9:00 
a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will take place at the National Institute of 
Standards and Technology, Administration Building, Lecture Room D, 
Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899-0001.

AGENDA:

--Welcome and Overview
--Issues Update
--Public Key Infrastructure and Related Issues
--Computerized Privacy Issues/Standards Review
--Privacy Database Development
--Pending Business
--Public Participation
--Agenda development for June meeting
--Wrap-Up

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: The Board agenda will include a period of time, 
not to exceed thirty minutes, for oral comments and questions from the 
public. Each speaker will be limited to five minutes. Members of the 
public who are interested in speaking area asked to contact the Board 
Secretariat at the telephone number indicated below. In addition, 
written statements are invited and may be submitted to the Board at any 
time. Written statements should be directed to the Information 
Technology Laboratory, Building 820, Room 426, National Institute of 
Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899-0001. It would be 
appreciated if fifteen copies of written material were submitted for 
distribution to the Board by March 21, 1997. Approximately 20 seats 
will be available for the public and media.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. Edward Roback, Board Secretariat, Information Technology 
Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Building 
820, Room 426, Gaithersburg, MD 20899-0001, telephone: (301) 975-3696.

    Dated: March 5, 1997.
Elaine Bunten-Mines,
Director, Program Office.
[FR Doc. 97-6177 Filed 3-11-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-13-M
#### IN RE: Anthony Paul MANRIQUE, Debtor. Anthony Paul Manrique, Appellant, v. U.S. Bank, as Trustee for Lehman XS Trust Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-16N, Appellee.

No. 16-56799

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted December 18, 2017 *

Filed December 26, 2017

Anthony Paul Manrique, Pro Se

Todd Stephen Garan, Pite Duncan, LLP, San Diego, CA, for Appellee

Before: WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Anthony Paul Manrique appeals pro se from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order denying Manrique’s Federal Rule of Civil Proce*388dure 60(b) motion. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We review de novo the district court’s decision on appeal from the bankruptcy court and apply the same standards of review applied by the district court. *Suncrest Healthcare Ctr. LLC v. Omega Healthcare Inv’rs, Inc. (In re Raintree Healthcare Corp.),*431 F.3d 685, 687 (9th Cir. 2005). We affirm.

The bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion by denying Manrique’s Rule 60(b) motion because Manrique failed to demonstrate any grounds for relief. *See*Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9024 (making Rule 60 applicable to bankruptcy cases); *Sch. Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah Cty., Or. v. ACandS, Inc.,*5 F.3d 1255, 1262-63 (9th Cir. 1993) (setting forth standard of review and grounds for relief under Rule 60(b)).

The district court properly determined that Manrique’s appeal of the bankruptcy court’s underlying order was untimely because Manrique failed to file the notice of appeal with the bankruptcy clerk within 14 days of entry of the order as required by Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8002(a)(1). *See*28 U.S.C. § 158(c)(2) (an appeal to the BAP or district court from a bankruptcy court must be taken within the time provided by Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8002); *Anderson v. Mouradick (In re Mouradick),*13 F.3d 326, 327 (9th Cir. 1994) (“The provisions of Bankruptcy Rule 8002 are jurisdictional.... ”).

We reject as unsupported by the record Manrique’s contentions that the bankruptcy court and the district court violated due process in relation to Manrique’s Rule 60(b) motion.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
# C_2022037EN.01004702.xml

| 24.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 37/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 37/47

---

Action brought on 19 November 2021 — Bora Creations v EUIPO (essence)

(Case T-738/21)

(2022/C 37/62)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Bora Creations, SL (Andratx, Spain) (represented by: R. Lange and M. Ebner, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: Application for EU figurative mark essence — Application for registration No 18 269 704

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 September 2021 in Case R 693/2021-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision and register the EU trade mark applied for; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision and register the EU trade mark applied for;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) and Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) and Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
# C_2022398EN.01002701.xml

| 17.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 398/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 398/27

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 4 August 2022 — Biogen Netherlands v Commission

(Case T-278/22 R)

(Interim relief - Medicinal products for human use - Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 - Marketing authorisation for Dimethyl fumarate Neuraxpharm - dimethyl fumarate - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency)

(2022/C 398/32)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Biogen Netherlands BV (Badhoevedorp, Netherlands) (represented by: C. Schoonderbeek, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Haasbeek and A. Sipos, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its application based on Articles 278 and 279 TFEU, the applicant seeks suspension of the operation of Commission Implementing Decision C(2022) 3254 final of 13 May 2022 granting marketing authorisation under Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council for ‘Dimethyl fumarate Neuraxpharm — dimethyl fumarate’ as a medicinal product for human use.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---