alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

Exhibit 99.9

CONSENT OF EXPERT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 40-F of Osisko
Gold Royalties Ltd (Osisko) filed with the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission (the Form 40-F), I, Luc Lessard, Eng., hereby consent to
the use of my name in connection with the reference to certain scientific and
technical information as set out under the heading Material Mineral Project -
The Canadian Malartic Royalty with respect to the Canadian Malartic Properties
in the Annual Information Form for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 filed
as an exhibit to the Form 40-F.

By: /s/ Luc
LessardName: Luc Lessard, Eng. March 27, 2017

---
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Knickerbocker Capital Corp. for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, I certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:  (1)the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Knickerbocker Capital Corp. for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Knickerbocker Capital Corp..    By:/s/ Dempsey MorkName:Dempsey MorkTitle:Principal Executive Officer,
and DirectorDate:Nov. 19, 2009By:/s/ Dempsey MorkName:Dempsey MorkTitle:Principal Financial OfficerDate:Nov. 19, 2009
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 46 (Monday, March 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10875-10876]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5857]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL PARK SERVICE


Notice of Intention To Issue a Concession Contract for Crater 
Lake National Park

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given in accordance with the requirements of 
36 CFR 51.5 that the National Park Service intends to issue a 3-year 
concession contract to continue operations currently conducted at 
Crater Lake National Park to provide park visitors with hotel, food, 
gift, touring, and other services. This action is necessary to avoid 
disruption of the provision of these services and to satisfy 
requirements that concession contracts do not extend for a continuous 
period exceeding 30 years. In accordance with the requirements of 
Public Law 89-249 (16 U.S.C. 20d), the current concessioner, having 
operated to the satisfaction of the Secretary, has a right to a 
preference in this renewal action.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notwithstanding the short term action which 
is the subject of this notice, it is the intention of the National Park 
Service that a Prospectus for a long term concession contract at Crater 
Lake will be issued no less than one year prior to the expiration of 
the 3-year contract to be issued. Before this action is taken,

[[Page 10876]]

the National Park Service must complete certain planning actions that 
will determine what specific services will be required and what changes 
from current operations will be necessary. That planning is currently 
underway, but is not complete. Additionally, with any change of 
concessioner, payment will be due to the current concessioner from the 
successor for real property assets at a level that is likely to exceed 
$3,000,000, but has not yet been definitively estimated. Additional 
sums for personal property would also be due and have not yet been 
estimated. Also, it is necessary in the short contract that the 
operating concessioner invest an additional $650,000 in furniture and 
fixtures to equip dormitory buildings that are under construction. 
Given these collective circumstances, it is not believed to be 
practical to expect a competitive successor offer at this time.
    Therefore, to effect the necessary investment and to allow for the 
necessary planning to be completed, it is the intention of the National 
park Service to enter into a 3-year contract with the current, 
preference holding concessioner.
    Information about this notice can be sought from: National Park 
Service, Assistant Field Director, Operations, Pacific West Region, 
Attention: Mr. Stephen G. Crabtree, 600 Harrison Street, Suite 600, San 
Francisco, California 94107-1372, or call: (415) 427-1366.

    Dated: February 21, 1997.
Patricia Neubacher,
Acting Regional Director, Pacific West Region.
[FR Doc. 97-5857 Filed 3-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Alex Romero MEDRANO, AKA Dreamer, Defendant-Appellee.

Nos. 15-50272, 16-50192, 16-50341, 17-50249

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 7, 2018 * Pasadena, California

Filed March 09, 2018

L. Ashley Aull, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Sue Bai, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Jennifer Y. Chou, Assistant U.S. Attorney, DOJ— *766Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, Michael Anthony Brown, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Jeffer Mangels Butler *&*Mitchell LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant

William S. Harris, Law Offices of Wm. S. Harris, South Pasadena, CA, for Defendant-Appellee

Before: REINHARDT, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

1. “[A] statutory minimum sentence is mandatory.” *United States v. Sykes,*658 F.3d 1140, 1146 (9th Cir. 2011). A district court does not have authority under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) to impose a sentence below the statutory, minimum. *United States v. Wipf,*620 F.3d 1168, 1171 (9th Cir. 2010). The district court erred by unlawfully sentencing Appellee Alex Medrano to a probationary sentence below the mandatory minimum as required by 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(B).

2. Medrano argues that a five-year sentence violates the Eighth Amendment. Our precedent forecloses this challenge. *See, e.g., Harmelin v. Michigan,*501 U.S. 957, 1001, 111 S.Ct. 2680, 115 L.Ed.2d 836 (1991) (Kennedy, J., concurring in part and concurring in the judgment) (“The Eighth Amendment ... forbids only extreme sentences that are ‘grossly disproportionate’ to the crime.” (quoting *Solem v. Helm,*463 U.S. 277, 288, 103 S.Ct. 3001, 77 L.Ed.2d 637 (1983)); *United States v. Jensen,*425 F.3d 698, 708 (9th Cir. 2005) (holding imposition of a life sentence for a first-time conviction for drug possession does not violate the Eighth Amendment).

3.Because the district court’s initial probationary sentence was unlawful, we must vacate the subsequent sentences following revocation, which are “part of the penalty for the initial offense.” *Johnson v. United States,*529 U.S. 694, 700, 120 S.Ct. 1795, 146 L.Ed.2d 727 (2000).

We therefore VACATE the sentences in each of these consolidated appeals and REMAND for resentencing on the offense of conviction in accordance with the mandatory minimum required by 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(B).

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3,
# C_2023235EN.01003801.xml

| 3.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 235/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 235/38

---

Judgment of the General Court of 17 May 2023 — moderne Stadt v EUIPO (DEUTZER HAFEN)

(Case T-656/22) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for EU word mark DEUTZER HAFEN - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Equal treatment)

(2023/C 235/51)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: moderne Stadt Gesellschaft zur Förderung des Städtebaues und der Gemeindeentwicklung mbH (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: G. Simon and L. Daams, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Klee, acting as Agent)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 24 August 2022 (Case R 2195/2021-5).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders moderne Stadt Gesellschaft zur Förderung des Städtebaues und der Gemeindeentwicklung mbH and the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders moderne Stadt Gesellschaft zur Förderung des Städtebaues und der Gemeindeentwicklung mbH and the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 472, 12.12.2022.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9052 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9052

 To impose limits on excepting competitive service positions from the 
              competitive service, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 28, 2020

 Mr. Connolly introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To impose limits on excepting competitive service positions from the 
              competitive service, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Preventing a Patronage System Act'' 
or the ``PPS Act''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATIONS ON EXCEPTION OF COMPETITIVE SERVICE POSITIONS.

    (a) In General.--No position in the competitive service (as defined 
under section 2102 of title 5, United States Code) may be excepted from 
the competitive service unless such position is placed--
            (1) in any of the schedules A through E as described in 
        section 6.2 of title 5, Code of Federal Regulations, as in 
        effect on September 30, 2020; and
            (2) under the terms and conditions under part 6 of such 
        title as in effect on such date.
    (b) Subsequent Transfers.--No position in the excepted service (as 
defined under section 2103 of title 5, United States Code) may be 
placed in any schedule other than a schedule described in subsection 
(a)(1).
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------




                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

          Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, the undersigned officer of Harold's
Stores, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that the Company's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 4, 2007 (the "Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.



Date:     September 18, 2007                      /s/ Ron Staffieri
                                                  -----------------------------
                                                  Ron Staffieri
                                                  Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8611 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8611

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 11, 2020

     Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 4755 Southeast Dixie Highway in Port Salerno, Florida, as the 
                ``Joseph Bullock Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JOSEPH BULLOCK POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 4755 Southeast Dixie Highway in Port Salerno, Florida, shall 
be known and designated as the ``Joseph Bullock Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Joseph 
Bullock Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 10, 2020.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS AT AND FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1997
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          86,583
<SECURITIES>                                     3,746
<RECEIVABLES>                                  347,939
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,797
<INVENTORY>                                    247,839
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               806,103
<PP&E>                                       1,118,677
<DEPRECIATION>                                 645,229
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,509,260
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          379,634
<BONDS>                                        164,004
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        45,045
<OTHER-SE>                                     799,974
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,509,260
<SALES>                                      1,762,308
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,764,706
<CGS>                                          878,325
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  880,928
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               119,336
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,449
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,651
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                227,740
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (25,604)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            253,344
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   253,344
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $5.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Alfredo IMANIL, AKA Karl Koja, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 16-70179

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted February 13, 2018 *

Filed February 22, 2018

Alfredo Imanil, Pro Se

Matt A. Crapo, Attorney, DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent

Before: LEAVY, FERNANDEZ, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Alfredo Imanil, a native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an *570immigration judge’s decision denying his application for cancellation of removal. We dismiss the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s denial of cancellation of removal as a matter of discretion. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i); *Monroy v. Lynch,*821 F.3d 1175, 1177-78 (9th Cir. 2016) (holding that petitioner did not raise a reviewable issue because “he simply disagrees with the agency’s weighing of his positive equities and the negative factors”).

Although the court would retain jurisdiction over colorable questions of law and constitutional claims, Imanil raises no such claim. *See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales,*424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir. 2005). (“To be colorable in this context, ... the claim must have some possible validity.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**MAC R1204-0109062 Old Annapolis RoadColumbia, MD 21045Tel: 410 884 2000 Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc. 

1585 Broadway

New York, New York 10036

 

 

RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2015-C20 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-C20

 

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of January 1, 2015 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2015 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

March 1, 2016

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President 

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.2
 
                         SECURITY CAPITAL PACIFIC TRUST
 
           COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES
                         AND PREFERRED SHARE DIVIDENDS
                         (DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                          TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                      -----------------------------------------
                                        1996     1995    1994    1993    1992
                                      -------- -------- ------- ------- -------
<S>                                   <C>      <C>      <C>     <C>     <C>
Net earnings from operations......... $ 94,089 $ 81,696 $46,719 $23,191 $ 9,037
Add:
  Interest expense...................   35,288   19,584  19,442   3,923   3,147
                                      -------- -------- ------- ------- -------
Earnings as adjusted................. $129,377 $101,280 $66,161 $27,114 $12,184
                                      ======== ======== ======= ======= =======
Combined fixed charges and preferred
 share dividends:
  Interest expense................... $ 35,288 $ 19,584 $19,442 $ 3,923 $ 3,147
  Capitalized interest...............   16,941   11,741   6,029   2,818     989
                                      -------- -------- ------- ------- -------
    Total fixed charges..............   52,229   31,325  25,471   6,741   4,136
  Preferred share dividends (a)......   24,167   21,823  16,100   1,341     --
                                      -------- -------- ------- ------- -------
Combined fixed charges and preferred
 share dividends..................... $ 76,396 $ 53,148 $41,571 $ 8,082 $ 4,136
                                      ======== ======== ======= ======= =======
Ratio of earnings to combined fixed
 charges and preferred share
 dividends...........................      1.7      1.9     1.6     3.4     2.9
                                      ======== ======== ======= ======= =======
</TABLE>
--------
(a) PTR had no preferred shares in any of the historical periods presented
    prior to 1993.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 996 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 996

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 
certain federally subsidized loan repayments for dental school faculty.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 6, 2019

 Ms. Clarke of New York (for herself, Mr. Gosar, Mr. Simpson, and Ms. 
    Meng) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy 
    and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 
certain federally subsidized loan repayments for dental school faculty.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Dental Loan Repayment Assistance 
Act''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN FEDERALLY SUBSIDIZED LOAN REPAYMENTS FOR 
              DENTAL SCHOOL FACULTY.

    (a) In General.--Section 108(f)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by inserting ``, under a loan repayment program 
receiving a grant or contract under section 748(a)(2) of such Act'' 
after ``section 338I of such Act''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 108(f)(4) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``National health service 
corps loan repayment program and certain state loan repayment 
programs'' in the heading thereof and inserting ``certain federal and 
state loan repayment programs''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to amounts received in taxable years beginning after the date of 
the enactment of this Act.
    (d) GAO Report.--The Comptroller General of the United States shall 
review and report to the appropriate committees of Congress on the 
participation of dental providers and faculty in areas and schools 
receiving funding from the Dental Faculty Development and Loan 
Repayment Program under section 748(a)(2) of the Public Health Service 
Act, including the extent to which they remain full-time faculty 
teaching and practicing in dental clinics located in dental schools, 
hospitals, or community-based affiliated sites after receiving funding 
from the program.
                                 <all>
```