alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                              5
<CIK>                                         0000818008
<NAME>                        LILLIAN VERNON CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                                       1,000
<CURRENCY>                                           USD

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            FEB-26-2000
<PERIOD-START>                               FEB-28-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                 NOV-27-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                        1
<CASH>                                            16,388
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     32,774
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                       45,048
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  99,153
<PP&E>                                            71,002
<DEPRECIATION>                                    34,596
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   154,647
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             34,463
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                             104
<OTHER-SE>                                       115,573
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     154,647
<SALES>                                          170,246
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 170,246
<CGS>                                             81,007
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    162,317
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   173
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    8,583
<INCOME-TAX>                                       3,176
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                5,407
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                       5,407
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0.59


</TABLE>
#### COM. v. MILLS, L.

289 WDA 2017

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/29/2017

CP-25-CR-0002190-2014 (Erie)

Affirmed — Application to Withdraw as Counsel Granted
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
 
  As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the use of our
reports (and to all references to our Firm) included in or made a part of this
registration statement.
 
                                                 /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
                                          -------------------------------------
                                                   Arthur Andersen LLP
 
New Orleans, Louisiana
September 25, 1997
<PAGE>
 
The schedules and exhibits to this agreement have been intentionally omitted in 
accordance with the rules and regulations of the Commission. The Company will 
provide such exhibits and schedules upon request of the Commission.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RIGABERTO PASTOR WILSON

GARCIA,

Petitioner,

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 22

- 695
Agency No. A071

- 831

- 143

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 2 6 , 2024 **

Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and KOH , Circuit Judges

.
Rigaberto Pastor Wilson

- Garcia , a native and citizen of Honduras , petitions pro

s e for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from

an immigration judge’s decision denying her application for deferral of removal

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

APR 4 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 22

- 695

under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under

8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings.

Conde Quevedo v. Barr , 947 F.3d 1238, 1241 (9th Cir. 2020). We grant the

petition for review and remand.

T he agency found that Wilson

- Garcia failed to show it is more likely than

not she would be tortured by or with the consent or acquiescence of the

government if returned to Honduras

. Substantial evidence does not support this

finding. See 8 C.F.R. §§ 1208.16(c)(3), 1208.18(a)(1), (7)

. Specifically, t he

c ountry conditions evidence in the record include s report s of an increasing level of

violence towards trans gender people in 2019

, with Honduras estimated as having

one of the highest murders rates for trans gender people in the world, the arbitrary

arrests of trans gender women , the role state security agents had in violence against

LGBTQ+ people, and a restriction in legal protections.

Because t he agency failed to address this relevant evidence

, we grant the

petition for review and remand Wilson

- Garcia ’s CAT claim to the agency for

further proceedings consistent with this disposition. See INS v. Ventura , 537 U.S.

12, 16

- 18 (2002) (per curiam) ; Parada v. Sessions , 902 F.3d 901, 91 4

- 16 (9th Cir.

2018) ( court remand ed where “the agency erred by failing to consider all relevant

evidence” as to CAT relief); Cole v. Holder , 659 F.3d 762, 771

- 72 (9th Cir. 2011)3 22

- 695

(indications of the agency’s failure to properly consider all of the relevant evidence

include “failing to mention highly probative or potentially dispositive evidence”).

We do not consider the materials Wilson

- Garcia references in her opening

brief that are not part of the administrative record

. See Fisher v. INS , 79 F.3d 955,

963

- 64 (9th Cir. 1996) (en banc).

We deny Wilson

- Garcia’s request for judicial notice.

The government must bear the costs for this petition for review.

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.
April 17, 2012



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

YEV TOLMACHYOV , Appellant

NO. 14

- 12

- 00196

- CV V.

EVERBANK , Appellee

____________________ Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment signed by the court below on January 13, 2012. Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED

. We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by YEV
TOLMACHYOV

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
No. 11-10579.

#### Ashworth *v.*Ziegler, Warden.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3

                               [Letterhead of NSA]

                CONSENT OF NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.

We hereby consent to the references to our firm in the Registration Statement on
Form S-8 of Plains Exploration & Production Company to the reserve reports as of
December 31, 1999, January 1, 2000, December 31, 2000, January 1, 2001, December
31, 2001, and January 1, 2002, setting forth the interests of Plains Exploration
& Production Company and its subsidiaries, and Arguello Inc., relating to the
estimated quantities of such companies' proved reserves of oil and gas and
present values thereof for the periods included therein.

                                     NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.

                                     By:  /s/ Danny D. Simmons
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Danny D. Simmons
                                         Executive Vice President

Houston, Texas
January 21, 2003


                                       11
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant
to Section 906

Of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned
officers of Rand Capital Corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 (the Form10-K) of the Company fully complies with the
requirement of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |                                                   
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 20, 2013 |  | 
|                      |  | 
|                      |  |  |  | LOGO                                              
|                      |  |  |  | Allen F. Grum, President
(Chief Executive Officer)



|                      |  |  |  |                                                         
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 20, 2013 |  | 
|                      |  | 
|                      |  |  |  | LOGO                                                    
|                      |  |  |  | Daniel P. Penberthy, Treasurer (Chief Financial Officer)



60
#### VETERANS ELECTRIC, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee

2017-1655

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

January 16, 2018

Brandon Michael Selinsky, Rocky Mountain Disability Law Group, Denver, CO, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

Albert S. Iarossi, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by Chad A. Readler, Robert E. Kirschman, Jr., Deborah A. Bynum.

(Prost, Chief Judge, Newman and Lourie, Circuit Judges).

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23(e)


                  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS


      We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration
Statement on Form S-4 of our reserve report dated February 4, 1997, relating to
the estimated quantities of proved reserves of oil and gas attributable to
certain interests of Plains Resources Inc. (the Company) and the related
estimates of future net income and discounted future net income for certain
periods, included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1996, as well as in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements of the Company in such annual report.  We also consent to the
reference to us under the heading "Experts" in such Registration Statement.


                              RYDER SCOTT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS COMPANY


                              /s/ RYDER SCOTT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS COMPANY
                              ____________________________________________



Houston, Texas
August 12, 1997
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 1.1
 
                                CERTIFICATE OF
                       FRIEDE GOLDMAN INTERNATIONAL INC.
                 AS TO PAYMENT OF ADDITIONAL REGISTRATION FEE
 
  Friede Goldman International Inc. (the "Registrant") hereby certifies to the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") that on July 21, 1997:
 
    (i) The Registrant has instructed its bank to wire transfer to the
  Commission the requisite filing fee of $1,626 due in connection with the
  filing of its Registration Statement with the Commission on July 21, 1997
  pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended;
 
    (ii) The Registrant will not revoke such instructions; and
 
    (iii) The Registrant has sufficient funds in the account from which the
  wire transfer will originate to cover the amount of the filing fee.
 
  The Registrant hereby undertakes to confirm on July 22, 1997 that its bank
has received such instructions.
 
                                          FRIEDE GOLDMAN INTERNATIONAL INC.
 
                                                 /s/ JAMES A. LOWE, III
                                          By: _________________________________
                                                   James A. Lowe, III
                                              General Counsel and Secretary
#### F. T. Baker v. W. W. Frick, Sheriff, Indian River County, and George S. Sales.

154 So. 846.

Opinion Filed May 14, 1934.

*Johnston &*Rogers, for Appellant;

*Vocelle & Mitchell,*for Appellees.

Davis, C. J.

— This is an appeal from a final decree dismissing a bill for injunction brought by appellant as sole complainant in the court below. It appears from the allegations of the bill that the object of the complaint was to have the Sheriff of Indian River County enjoined from proceeding with the execution of a certain writ of *habere facias possessionem*issued on a judgment rendered in an ejectment suit wherein one George S. Dales was plaintiff and appellant F. T. Baker was one of the defendants. The contention of the appellant is that injunctive relief should have been granted because the sheriff had attempted to execute the writ against the party named in it by applying it to the wrong property and not the property actually described in the judgment in ejectment. The court dismissed the bill for want of equity and dissolved a temporary injunction that had been granted thereon.

In City of Coral Gables v. Hopkins, 107 Fla. 778, 144 Sou. Rep. 385, it was held by us that a court of law may, ■on motion, set aside a levy of an execution on property not subject to seizure, when all the interested parties are before *766the court. We think the same principle holds good where it is claimed that a court’s executive officer is wrongfully proceeding to execute its writ of *habere facias possessionem*by ejecting the defendant named in it from land which the writ does not legally describe nor cover.

A Circuit Judge under Section 4516 C. G. L., 2829 R. G. S., has full power either in term time or vacation to correct, restrain and control the process of a court of law, including a writ of *habere facias possessionem,*including the manner in which it is being executed, and no resort is necessary to a court of chancery in such cases, unless the necessity therefor arises from independent equities apart from the process. Robinson v. Yong, 8 Fla. 350; Budd v. Long, 13 Fla. 288; Barnett v. Hickson, 52 Fla. 457, 41 Sou. Rep. 606. So the dismissal of the bill involved in this case was correct.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, Terrell, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.
Exhibit 3.1

          Amendments to the Articles of Incorporation of Northland Cranberries,
Inc.

          Pursuant to the affirmative vote of the shareholders of the Company on
January 30, 2002, and effective on February 4, 2002, the Company's Articles of
Incorporation were amended as described below.

          1. The first sentence of Article 4 of the Company's Articles of
Incorporation was amended to read in its entirety as follows:

          "The total number of shares of all classes of capital stock which the
Corporation shall have authority to issue is One Hundred Fifty-Nine Million
(159,000,000) shares, consisting of: (i) One Hundred Fifty Million (150,000,000)
shares of a class designated as "Class A Common Stock," with a par value of one
cent ($.01) per share; (ii) Four Million (4,000,000) shares of a class
designated as "Class B Common Stock," with a par value of one cent ($.0l) per
share; and (iii) Five Million (5,000,000) shares of a class designated as
"Preferred Stock," with a par value of one cent ($.0l) per share."

          2. A new Article 9 was added to the Company's Articles of
Incorporation which reads in its entirety as follows:

          "Action required or permitted by the Wisconsin Business Corporation
Law to be taken at a shareholders' meeting may be taken without a meeting if a
written consent or consents, describing the action so taken, is signed by
shareholders who would be entitled to vote at a meeting those shares with voting
power to cast not less than the minimum number or, in the case of voting by
voting groups, numbers of votes that would be necessary to authorize or take the
action at a meeting at which all shares entitled to vote were present and
voted."
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 853 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 853

 To expand retroactive eligibility of the Army Combat Action Badge to 
  include members of the Army who participated in combat during which 
 they personally engaged, or were personally engaged by, the enemy at 
                 any time on or after December 7, 1941.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 29, 2019

Mr. Mooney of West Virginia (for himself and Mr. Latta) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To expand retroactive eligibility of the Army Combat Action Badge to 
  include members of the Army who participated in combat during which 
 they personally engaged, or were personally engaged by, the enemy at 
                 any time on or after December 7, 1941.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Army Combat Action Badge Eligibility 
Act''.

SEC. 2. RETROACTIVE AWARD OF ARMY COMBAT ACTION BADGE.

    (a) Authority To Award.--The Secretary of the Army may award the 
Army Combat Action Badge to a person who, as determined by the 
Secretary--
            (1) participated as a member of the Army at any time during 
        the eligibility period in combat during which the person 
        personally engaged, or was personally engaged by, the enemy; 
        and
            (2) has not been previously recognized in an appropriate 
        manner for the member's participation in such combat.
    (b) Procurement of Badge.--The Secretary of the Army may make 
arrangements with suppliers of the Army Combat Action Badge so that 
persons eligible to receive the Army Combat Action Badge pursuant to 
subsection (a) may procure the badge directly from suppliers, thereby 
eliminating, or at least substantially reducing, administrative costs 
for the Army to carry out this section.
    (c) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Army combat action badge.--The term ``Army Combat 
        Action Badge'' means the military decoration established by 
        order of the Secretary of the Army through Headquarters, 
        Department of the Army Letter 600-05-1, dated June 3, 2005.
            (2) Eligibility period.--The term ``eligibility period'' 
        means the period beginning on December 7, 1941, and ending on 
        September 18, 2001 (the date of the otherwise applicable 
        limitation on the retroactive award of the Army Combat Action 
        Badge).
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 49 (Thursday, March 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 11915]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6326]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[AZ-910-0777-61-241A]


State of Arizona Resource Advisory Council Meeting

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Arizona Resource Advisory Council meeting, notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting and tour of the Arizona 
Resource Advisory Council. The meeting will be held April 10, 1997, 
beginning at 1:00 p.m. at the Fire Station in Sonoita, Arizona. The 
Station is at the crossroads of Highway 83 and 82. The agenda items to 
be covered at the business meeting include review of previous meeting 
minutes; BLM State Director's Update on legislation, regulations and 
statewide planning efforts; Update on the Record of Decision of the 
Statewide Plan Amendment for Arizona Standards for Rangeland Health and 
Guidelines for Grazing Management; and Reports by the Recreation and 
Public Relations Working Groups; Reports from RAC members; RAC 
Discussion on future meeting dates and locations. A public comment 
period will take place at 4:00 p.m. April 10, 1997 for any interested 
publics who wish to address the Council. Following the meeting, the BLM 
and the RAC will host an informal Open House at the same location from 
5:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. On April 11, 1997, the RAC will tour the Empire-
Cienega Resource Conservation Area and discuss the ongoing planning 
efforts with the Sonoita Valley Planning Partnership. The tour will 
start at 8:30 a.m. from the Empire Ranch House and will conclude at 
2:00 p.m.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Deborah Stevens or Ken Mahoney Bureau of Land Management, Arizona State 
Office, 222 North Central Avenue, Phoenix, Arizona 85004-2203, (602) 
417-9512.

Joanie Losacco,
Deputy State Director, External Affairs.
[FR Doc. 97-6326 Filed 3-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-32-M