alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 44 (Thursday, March 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 10266]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5480]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Project Nos. 11285-003]

Casitas Municipal Water District; Notice of Extension of Comment 
Date

February 28, 1997.
    Because of delayed newspaper publication of the notice issued 
February 5, 1997 (62 FR 8235, February 24, 1997), for the Lake Casitas 
Power Project, the comment date in item j. is being extended from March 
25, 1997 to April 1, 1997.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-5480 Filed 3-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
ex10a.htm
















Exhibit 10(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 22 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-145531) pertaining to Lincoln New York Account N for Variable Annuities, which is incorporated by reference into Post-Effective Amendment No. 19 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-141760) and Amendment No. 263 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-09763), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) April 1, 2014, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New York and (b) April 1, 2014, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln New York Account N for Variable Annuities for the registration of interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.













/s/ Ernst & Young LLP












Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


April 1, 2014
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


                      [PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LETTERHEAD]
                                        




                       Report of Independent Accountants
                                        
                        On Financial Statement Schedules


To the Board of Directors of
Puerto Rican Cement Company, Inc.


Our audits of the consolidated financial statements referred to in our report
dated February 19, 1999 appearing on page 19 of the 1998 Annual Report to
Shareholders of Puerto Rican Cement Company, Inc. (which report and
consolidated financial statements are incorporated by reference in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K) also included an audit of the Financial Statement
Schedules listed in Item 14(a) of this Form 10-K. In our opinion these
Financial Statement Schedules present fairly, in all material respects, the
information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related
consolidated financial statements.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
------------------------------------

PRICEWATERHOUSE COOPERS LLP

San Juan, Puerto Rico

February 19, 1999

CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
(OF PUERTO RICO)
License No. 216 Expires Dec. 1, 2001
Stamp 1537511 of the P.R. Society of
Certified Public Accountants has been
affixed to the file copy of this report.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                                Certification of
                             Chief Financial Officer
                        of Mission Resources Corporation

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, and accompanies the annual report on Form 10-K (the
"Form 10-K") for the period ended December 31, 2002 of Mission Resources
Corporation (the "Issuer").

I, Richard W. Piacenti, the Chief Financial Officer of the Issuer, certify that:

     (i)  the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and

     (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Issuer.

Dated:  March 25, 2003                      /s/ Richard W. Piacenti
                                            ------------------------------------



Subscribed and sworn to before me
this 25th day of March 2003



/s/    Carmen M. Garcia
---------------------------------------


Notary Public in and for the
State of Texas

My commission expires:







A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Mission Resources Corporation and will be retained by Mission
Resources Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       261,200
<OTHER-SE>                                   (261,200)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          24,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,193,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    166,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,508,000
<PP&E>                                         506,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,916,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,235,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  9,717,000
<COMMON>                                    12,826,000
<OTHER-SE>                                (17,546,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,916,000
<SALES>                                      1,651,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,651,000
<CGS>                                          613,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  959,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,818,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,739,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,739,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,739,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.09)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2023007EN.01001601.xml

| 9.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 7/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 7/16

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 19 October 2022 —  I (*1) GmbH & Co. KG v Hauptzollamt  HZA (*1)

(Case C-655/22)

(2023/C 7/20)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesfinanzhof

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: I (*1) GmbH & Co. KG

Defendant: Hauptzollamt  HZA (*1)

Questions referred

| 1. | Is Article 2 of Regulation No 1360/2013 (1) to be interpreted as meaning that a sugar manufacturer should have submitted its claim for repayment of levies unduly paid before 30 September 2014? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is Article 2 of Regulation No 1360/2013 (1) to be interpreted as meaning that a sugar manufacturer should have submitted its claim for repayment of levies unduly paid before 30 September 2014?

| 2. | If the first question is answered in the negative: In a case such as this (definitively fixed levies applied in breach of EU law, the reimbursement of which was requested only one year after Regulation No 1360/2013 retroactively established a lower coefficient), is the competent authority entitled to refuse to reimburse production levies unduly paid on the basis of national provisions on the force of res judicata, of the time limit for levy assessments under national law and of the principle of legal certainty under EU law? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If the first question is answered in the negative: In a case such as this (definitively fixed levies applied in breach of EU law, the reimbursement of which was requested only one year after Regulation No 1360/2013 retroactively established a lower coefficient), is the competent authority entitled to refuse to reimburse production levies unduly paid on the basis of national provisions on the force of res judicata, of the time limit for levy assessments under national law and of the principle of legal certainty under EU law?

---

(*1)  Information erased or replaced within the framework of protection of personal data and/or confidentiality.

(1)  Council Regulation (EU) No 1360/2013 of 2 December 2013 fixing the production levies in the sugar sector for the 2001/2002, 2002/2003, 2003/2004, 2004/2005 and 2005/2006 marketing years, the coefficient required for calculating the additional levy for the 2001/2002 and 2004/2005 marketing years and the amount to be paid by sugar manufacturers to beet sellers in respect of the difference between the maximum levy and the levy to be charged for the 2002/2003, 2003/2004 and 2005/2006 marketing years (OJ 2013, L 343, p. 2).

---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 7 (Friday, January 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 1487]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-628]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
[STB Finance Docket No. 33322]


Georgetown Railroad Company, Acquisition and Operation Exemption, 
Missouri Pacific Railroad Company

    Georgetown Railroad Company (GRR), a Class III rail carrier, has 
filed a verified notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.41 to acquire 
and operate over approximately 8,338 feet of Missouri Pacific Railroad 
Company's (MP) line of railroad known as MP's ICC Track No. 11 in 
Georgetown, which extends from the terminus of GRR's line at milepost 
0.0 (MP's former milepost 923.70) in Georgetown, to the east side of 
Church Street in Georgetown, at milepost 0.54; and MP's undivided one-
half interest in ICC Track No. 48, extending from milepost 0.54 south 
and west 5,470 feet to a point connecting with GRR's line from Kerr, in 
Williamson County, TX.<SUP>1 GRR is also acquiring MP's undivided one-
half interest in the 5,478-foot ICC Track No. 47, and a 120-foot 
section of Track No. 11, in Georgetown, but as these will be used as 
side tracks, no exemption from 49 U.S.C. 10902 is necessary, due to the 
statutory exemption for acquisition and operation of side tracks in 49 
U.S.C. 10906.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ This transaction involves GRR's acquisition and operation of 
a 1.58-mile segment of track connecting GRR's line from Kerr to 
Georgetown, TX, with a 16.32-mile line from Georgetown to Granger, 
TX, that GRR purchased from MP. Abandonment of the line was 
authorized in Missouri Pacific Railroad Company--Abandonment--in 
Williamson County, TX (Georgetown Branch), Docket No. AB-3 (Sub-No. 
94) (ICC served Oct. 21, 1991).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The exemption was effective on December 20, 1996. The parties 
indicate that consummation of the transaction will occur within 90 days 
after the effective date of the exemption.
    If the verified notice contains false or misleading information, 
the exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the exemption 
under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. The filing of a 
petition to revoke will not automatically stay the transaction.
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 33322, must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, Office of the Secretary, Case Control Branch, 1201 Constitution 
Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20423. In addition, a copy of each 
pleading must be served on: Betty Jo Christian, Steptoe & Johnson LLP, 
1330 Connecticut Ave., N.W., Washington, DC 20036.

    Decided: January 3, 1997.

    By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-628 Filed 1-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
<PAGE>   1


                                                                      Exhibit 12


                Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                          (Dollar amounts in thousands)
                                   (Unaudited)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                        YEARS ENDED JUNE 30,
                                         1997        1996          1995        1994         1993
                                         ----        ----          ----        ----         ----
<S>                                   <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>             <C>   
Income before income taxes,
   extraordinary item, and change
   in accounting principle             $227,740     $146,130      $  (270)     $33,745      $39,584
add:
   Interest expense                      12,455       19,216       20,434       22,318       26,991
   Portion of rents representative
     of interest factor(a)                9,804       11,550       11,550       12,870       12,870
   Equity in net losses of Ericsson
     Raynet joint venture                    --       29,818       85,946           --           --
less:
   Capitalized interest                    (393)        (660)        (724)      (1,172)        (362)
                                       ------------------------------------------------------------

Income as adjusted                     $249,606     $206,054     $116,936      $67,761      $79,083
                                       ============================================================

Fixed Charges:
  Interest expense                     $ 12,455     $ 19,216     $ 20,434      $22,318      $26,991
  Portion of rents representative
    of interest factor(a)                 9,804       11,550       11,550       12,870       12,870
  Debt prepayment penalty(b)                 --           --        7,814           --           --
                                       ------------------------------------------------------------

Fixed Charges                          $ 22,259     $ 30,766      $39,798      $35,188      $39,861

                                       ============================================================
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges        11.21         6.70         2.94         1.93         1.98
                                       ============================================================
</TABLE>


(a)   Calculated as approximately one-third of rental expense, representing a
      reasonable approximation of such rentals attributable to interest.

(b)   Represents effective interest charged on the early retirement of debt.
      Recorded as an extraordinary loss on the income statement.
# College Preparation

- Secretary Cardona's Remarks on Career Pathways and Success Good afternoon. Isn't it great to hear the First Lady of the United States? Thank you, Dr. Biden, and thank you to Aon, and Greg Case, for welcoming us here today.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 2 (Friday, January 3, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 314]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-63]



[[Page 314]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION AGENCY

U.S. Agency for International Development

22 CFR Part 228

RIN 0412-AA28


Rules on Source, Origin and Nationality for Commodities and 
Services Financed by the Agency for International Development; 
Correction

AGENCY: United States Agency for International Development (USAID), 
IDCA.

ACTION: Correction to final regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains corrections to final regulations (22 
CFR Part 228) which were published Tuesday, October 15, 1996 (61 FR 
53615). The regulations cover USAID's rules on source, origin and 
nationality for commodities and services financed by USAID.

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 3, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kathleen J. O'Hara, Office of Procurement, Procurement Policy Division 
(M/OP/P), USAID, Room 1600A, SA-14, Washington, DC 20523-1435. 
Telephone (703) 875-1534, facsimile (703) 875-1243.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The final rule that is the subject of these 
corrections was effective on November 14, 1996.

Need for Correction

    As published, the final rule contains errors which may prove to be 
misleading and are in need of correction.

Correction of Publication

    Accordingly, the publication on October 15, 1996 of the final rule, 
which were the subject of FR Doc. 96-26246, is corrected as follows:


Sec. 228.11(b)  [Corrected]

    1. On page 53618, in the first column, in Sec. 228.11, paragraph 
(b) is corrected by removing ``non-Free World'' and putting ``foreign 
policy restricted'' in its place.


Sec. 228.13  [Corrected]

    2. On page 53618, in the second column, in Sec. 228.13, paragraph 
(b) is corrected by deleting the fifth sentence, which begins on line 
23 of the paragraph.


Sec. 228.14  [Corrected]

    3. On page 53628, in the third column, in Sec. 228.14, paragraph 
(c)(2) is corrected by deleting ``Deputy Assistant Administrator for 
Management (DAA/M)'' and putting ``Procurement Executive'' in its 
place.


Sec. 228.22  [Corrected]

    4. On page 53619, in the second column, in Sec. 228.22, paragraph 
(d), the word ``agreement'' at the end of the paragraph is corrected to 
read ``agreements''.


Sec. 228.37  [Corrected]

    5. On page 53621, in the first column, in Sec. 228.37, paragraph 
(b), line nine is corrected by adding the word ``Director'' after 
``Mission''.


Sec. 228.51  [Corrected]

    6. On page 53622, in the first column, in Sec. 228.51, paragraph 
(c) is corrected by adding: ``In no event, however, shall procurement 
be from a non-Code 935 source.'' at the end of the paragraph.

    Dated: December 13, 1996.
Marcus L. Stevenson,
Procurement Executive.
[FR Doc. 97-63 Filed 1-2-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6116-01-M
No. 11-9949.

#### Moxley *v.*Neven, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT

THIS   AGREEMENT   made  and  entered  into  as  of  this14th day of November,  2000, between PUGET SOUND ENERGY, a WashingtonCorporation     (the     “Company”)     and    WILLIAM    S.    WEAVER(“Employee”).  The term “Parties”  refers to the Company andthe Employee. 

RECITALS

A. The Parties entered in an Agreement  ("Employment  Agreement")  datedOctober 18, 1996;

B.  The  Company's  Board of  Directors  has  requested  Employee not toterminate employment voluntarily prior to December 31, 2001;

C.  Employee  agrees not to terminate  employment  voluntarily  prior toDecember 31, 2001; and

D.  The  Parties  wish to  supplement  the terms and  conditions  of theEmployment  Agreement to ensure that Employee is not economically  prejudiced byagreeing with the Board's request.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants andagreements contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, theParties agree as follows:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7864 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JOSE LUIS ACEVEDO,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior

District Judge. (CR-92-427; CA-97-2080)

Submitted: March 30, 2006 Decided: April 10, 2006

Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jose Luis Acevedo, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas More Hollenhorst,

Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Jose Luis Acevedo, a federal prisoner, seeks to appeal

the district court’s order denying his motion filed under Fed. R.

Civ. P. 60(b), in which he sought reconsideration of the court’s

order denying as untimely his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255

(2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that

the district court’s assessment of his constitutional claims is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural rulings by

the district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v.

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S.

473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Acevedo

has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We deny

Acevedo’s motion for abeyance as moot and dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED