alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bitstream Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his or her knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act); and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |                                                                          |  |             
|------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ------------
|SIGNATURE           |  | TITLE                                                                    |  | DATE        
|                    |  |                                                                         
|/s/ Anna M. Chagnon |  | President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)      |  | May 15, 2009
|Anna M. Chagnon     |  |                                                                         
|                    |  |                                                                         
|/s/ James P. Dore   |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |  | May 15, 2009
|James P. Dore       |  |                                                                         

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to liability under that section. This certification shall not be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form with the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

                   THE COASTAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                             (DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
                                                                                 NINE MONTHS 
                                                                                    ENDED
                                          YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,                SEPTEMBER 30,
                                ------------------------------------------     ------------------     
                                1991    1992      1993     1994     1995        1995        1996
                                ----    ------    -----    -----    ------     -------     ------
<S>                             <C>     <C>       <C>      <C>      <C>        <C>         <C>             
Earnings:
  Pretax earnings (loss)
   from continuing
   operations............      $  (.7)  $(197.2)  $202.4   $324.9   $297.2     $ 182.8     $ 253.5
  Fixed charges,
   excluding capitalized
   interest--see below...       480.5     524.8    481.8    433.9    441.9       334.5       302.3
                              -------   -------   ------   ------   ------     -------     -------
  Earnings...............     $ 479.8   $ 327.6   $684.2   $758.8   $739.1     $ 517.3     $ 555.8
                              =======   =======   ======   ======   ======     =======     =======
Fixed Charges:
  Interest expense.......     $ 437.8   $ 485.2   $442.5   $407.8   $415.4     $ 314.9     $ 278.2
  Interest factor, in-
   cluded in rentals.....        32.7      30.9     32.7     24.0     26.5        19.6        24.1
  Dividends on preferred
   stock of subsidiaries.        10.0       8.7      6.6      2.1       --          --          --
                              -------   -------   ------   ------   ------     -------     -------
  Fixed charges,
   excluding capitalized
   interest..............       480.5     524.8    481.8    433.9    441.9       334.5       302.3    
  Capitalized interest...        22.1      10.7      8.4      8.3      5.9         4.6         5.5
                              -------   -------   ------   ------   ------     -------     -------
  Fixed charges..........     $ 502.6   $ 535.5   $490.2   $442.2   $447.8     $ 339.1     $ 307.8 
                              =======   =======   ======   ======   ======     =======     =======
Ratio of earnings to
 fixed charges...........         --        --     1.40x    1.72x    1.65x       1.53x       1.81x
                              =======   =======   ======   ======   ======     =======     =======
</TABLE> 

For the years ended December 31, 1991 and 1992, earnings were less than fixed 
charges by $22.8 million and $207.9 million, respectively.
# C_2023094EN.01001301.xml

| 13.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/13

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht München (Germany) lodged on 24 November 2022 — Citadines Betriebs GmbH v MPLC Deutschland GmbH

(Case C-723/22)

(2023/C 94/14)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberlandesgericht München

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Citadines Betriebs GmbH

Respondent: MPLC Deutschland GmbH

Question referred

Must Article 3(1) of Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 March 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society (1) be interpreted as precluding a national provision or practice according to which the provision of physical facilities for enabling or making a communication — such as television sets in hotel rooms or hotel fitness rooms — is regarded as communication to the public when, while the transmission signal, in addition, is retransmitted to the physical facilities via the hotel’s own cable distribution system, that cable retransmission takes place lawfully on the basis of a licence acquired by the hotel?

---

(1)  OJ 2001 L 167, p. 10.

---
No. 11-10643.

#### Hall *v.*Brunsman, Warden.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPI RES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT TRICIA ANN WALTER, as Personal ) Representative of the Estate of Norine C. ) Walter, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D15-2467 ) SUNRISE SENIOR LIVING SERVICES, ) INC., d/b/a BRIGHTON GARDENS OF ) TAMPA; JAI LARMAN; and CARLA ) RUSSO, ) ) Respondents. ) ) Opinion filed July 22, 2015.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; William P. Levens, Judge. Thomas A. Burns of Burns, P.A., Tampa; and G. William Lazenby, IV, of Mac A. Greco, Jr., P.A., Tampa, for Petitioner. Ronald E. Bush of Bush, Graziano & Rice, Tampa, for Respondents.

ALTENBERND, Judge. The Personal Representative of the Estate of Norine C. Walter seeks certiorari review of an order striking her request for trial by jury in an action alleging that the negligence of employees or agents of Sunrise Senior Living Services, Inc., resulted- 2 - in personal injury to or the wrongful death of Norine Walter. The trial court struck the request for trial by jury based on the express waiver of trial by jury in the nursing facility residency agreement signed by Norine Walter. Although the peti tion for writ of certiorari

contains citations t o many legal authorities, it fails to cite to Jaye v. Royal Saxon, Inc., 720 So. 2d 214 (Fla. 1998), which holds that an order striking a demand for trial by jury is not reviewable by certiorar i. Thus, if the Personal Represe ntative believes that she is aggrieved by this order after the conclusion of a nonjury trial , she is free to raise this issue on direct appeal. The petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.

CRENSHAW and SALA RIO, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit 4.3-20-F-2013






Exhibit 4.3







	
					
	1405 boul du Parc Technologique
Quebec (Quebec) G1P 4P5
Canada
	 
	 
	 
	100 Marketplace, Suite 203
25 Mountainview Blvd.
Basking Ridge, NJ 07920-3452
USA








June 14, 2013


DELIVERED BY HAND
Paul Blake, M.D.
Senior Vice President and Chief Medical Officer
[civic address redacted for privacy reasons]


Re:    Termination of the Change of Control Program


Dear Paul:
As provided in your employment agreement, Aeterna Zentaris Inc. (hereinafter the   "Corporation") hereby formally informs you that the Change of Control Program (hereinafter the "Program") that is currently detailed in Appendix 1 of your employment agreement is terminated.
Section 5 of Appendix 1 of your employment agreement dated July 18, 2007 provides that the Corporation may terminate the Program at any time and for any reason by providing you with a written notice of at least 30 days prior to each anniversary date of the signature of the agreement, namely July 18.
The Corporation has decided to exercise its right to terminate the Program.
As a consequence of the termination of the Program, section 7.1 and Appendix 1 of your employment agreement shall be deemed void and inapplicable as of July 18, 2013, although the termination of the Program does not affect the remaining provisions of your employment agreement.
Please let me know if you have any questions related to the above.


Sincerely,

David A. Dodd
President and CEO
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In the interest of D.T.M., J.B.M., * From the 358th District

and R.A.M., children, Court of Ector County,

 Trial Court No. D-5392-AD.

No. 11-14-00245-CV * April 30, 2015

* Memorandum Opinion by Willson, J.

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no 

error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the 

order of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of PubliCARD, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in
      the
      capacity and date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:
                March 30, 2006
            
            
            /s/
                Antonio L. DeLiseAntonio
                L. DeLisePresident,
                Chief Executive Officer,Chief
                Financial Officer and Secretary(Principal
                Executive and Financial Officer)





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      PubliCARD, Inc. and will be retained by PubliCARD, Inc. and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-12-00316-CR

Shawn Pierre LEE,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2010CR6846

Honorable George H. Godwin, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE, JUSTICE MARION, AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is 

AFFIRMED. 

SIGNED July 30, 2014.

_____________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                           JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                             JUN-30-1997 
<CASH>                                            13 
<SECURITIES>                                       0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                     72 
<ALLOWANCES>                                       5 
<INVENTORY>                                        9 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 133      
<PP&E>                                           376       
<DEPRECIATION>                                   220
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   657
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            155
<BONDS>                                          337
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                           0
<OTHER-SE>                                        50
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     657
<SALES>                                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 761
<CGS>                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    605
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  23
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   2
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                21
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   12
<INCOME-TAX>                                       4
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                8
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0   
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0       
<CHANGES>                                          0   
<NET-INCOME>                                       8  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    .34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    .34
        
                                  


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0000818674
<NAME>                        INTELLICALL, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                           1
<CASH>                                2,438
<SECURITIES>                              0    
<RECEIVABLES>                        24,195   
<ALLOWANCES>                          3,260
<INVENTORY>                           8,394 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      1,538  
<PP&E>                               10,946  
<DEPRECIATION>                        8,947  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       44,792
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                13,155 
<BONDS>                                   0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0   
<PREFERRED>                               0  
<COMMON>                                 93 
<OTHER-SE>                           12,607 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         44,792        
<SALES>                               3,272  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     23,154  
<CGS>                                 3,617 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        21,504 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      2,853 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      600
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      (1,726)  
<INCOME-TAX>                              0   
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  (1,726)  
<DISCONTINUED>                            0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0   
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                         (1,726) 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          (.19) 
<EPS-DILUTED>                             0 
        


</TABLE>
# C_2022389EN.01001801.xml

| 10.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 389/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 389/18

---

Action brought on 29 August 2022 — Aldi v EUIPO — Heredero de Navarra (LYTTOS)

(Case T-517/22)

(2022/C 389/20)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Aldi GmbH & Co. KG (Mülheim an der Ruhr, Germany) (represented by: N. Lützenrath, C. Fürsen, M. Minkner and A. Starcke, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Heredero de Navarra, SL (Mendavia, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: Application for EU word mark LYTTOS — Application No 18 126 191

Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 May 2022 in Case R 1462/2021-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 47(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 47(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
EXHIBIT 21.1

                                 PUBLICARD, INC
                            AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES




                                                          STATE OF JURISDICTION
SUBSIDIARY                                                    OF INCORPORATION
--------------------------------------                    ----------------------
Amazing! Smart Card Technologies, Inc.                        California
Blackwold, Inc.                                               Delaware
Boxsterview, Inc.                                             Delaware
Continental Distilling Corporation                            Delaware
Greystone Peripherals, Inc.                                   California
Hanten Acquisition Co.                                        Delaware
Infineer, Inc.                                                Florida
Infineer Ltd.                                                 Northern Ireland
Orr-Schelen-Mayeron & Associates, Inc.                        Minnesota
Publicker Chemical Corporation                                Louisiana
Publicker Gasohol, Inc.                                       Delaware
Publicker, Inc.                                               Delaware
Redwold, Inc.                                                 Delaware
Sagrocry, Inc.                                                Pennsylvania
No. 11-1276.

#### Mikel, Individually and as Father and Next Friend of Mikel *v.*School Board of Spotsylvania County.

Sup. Ct. Va. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3



                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS
                   ------------------------------------------


     H. J. Gruy and Associates, Inc. hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in this Registration Statement on Form S-8 of our reserve report dated
February 7, 1997, relating to the estimated quantities of certain of the
Company's proved reserves of oil and gas and the related estimates of future net
revenue and present values thereof for certain periods, included in the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996, as
well as in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company in
such annual report.    We also consent to the reference to us under the heading
"Interests of Named Experts and Counsel" in such Registration Statement.

                                     H. J. GRUY AND ASSOCIATES, INC.



                                     /s/ H. J. GRUY AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
                                     ------------------------------------------


Houston, Texas
May 20,  1997
# C_2023189EN.01003001.xml

| 30.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 189/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 189/30

---

Judgment of the General Court of 19 April 2023 — Siemens v Parliament

(Case T-74/22) (1)

(Public procurement - Public works contracts - Tendering procedure - Renewal of the fire safety system in the Parliament buildings in Strasbourg - Rejection of a tenderer’s tender and award of the contract to other tenderers - Non-contractual liability)

(2023/C 189/39)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Siemens SAS (Saint-Denis, France) (represented by: E. Berkani and M. Blanchard, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: E. Taneva and V. Naglič, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action, the applicant seeks, principally, on the basis of Article 263 TFEU, annulment of the decisions of the European Parliament of 8 December 2021 not to accept the tenders submitted by the consortium composed of the applicant and Eiffage Energie Systèmes — Alsace Franche-Comté in the context of Lots Nos 1 and 2 of call for tenders 06A 70/2021/M004, relating to the renewal of the fire safety system in the Parliament buildings in Strasbourg (France), and to award the contract to other tenderers, and, in the alternative, on the basis of Article 268 TFEU, compensation for the loss which it allegedly suffered as a result of the adoption of the contested decisions.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Siemens SAS to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Siemens SAS to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 138, 28.3.2022.

---