alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1


            Certification of Chief Executive and Financial Officer of
               Monument Resources, Inc. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350


I, A.G. Foust, certify that:

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Monument
Resources, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, A.G. Foust, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                            By:  /s/  A.G. Foust
                                               --------------------------------
                                            Name:     A.G. Foust
                                            Title:    Chief Executive and
                                                      Financial Officer
                                            Date:     May 12, 2004
The Draper Report set the rules for U.S. 

security assistance and security cooperation. 

William Henry Draper, Jr., was 

the Chairman of the U.S. 

President’s Committee to study 

the U.S. Military Assistance 

Program. The findings by the 

committee, also called the Draper 

Committee, laid the foundation 

for the Foreign Assistance Act 

and revisions to Military 

Assistance Program procedures.

WILLIAM HENRY DRAPER, JR.

AUTHOR OF U.S. MILITARY ASSISTANCE

BIOGRAPHY

In 1958, President Dwight D. Eisenhower asked 

then-Ambassador to NATO, William Draper, to serve as the 

chairman of an independent committee charged with 

conducting a nonpartisan analysis of the military assistance 

aspects of the 1949 Mutual Defense Assistance Act. 

The analysis, known as the Draper Report, delineated roles 

and responsibilities between the Departments of State and 

Defense. The State Department was responsible for 

providing policy guidance related to military assistance, 

and assurances that the Military Assistance Program (MAP) 

would conform with U.S. foreign policy. The Defense 

Department would be responsible for planning programs 

and execution within the framework of policy guidance 

provided by the National Security Council and the State 

Department. Draper and his team also provided 

implementation guidance to increase the efficiency of 

MAP. Some of this guidance became key components for 

the 1961 Foreign Assistance Act, and formed the basis for 

security assistance and security cooperation. 

September 1st, 2021 marks 50 years since the 

establishment of DSCA.

In celebration of this milestone, DSCA is highlighting 

notable “Security Cooperators” who have served the 

Security Cooperation community over the past 50 years. 

These individuals, uniformed and civilian, all exemplify 

professionalism and public service, and embody DSCA’s 

ethos of “security through global partnerships.” 

“Faces of Security Cooperation” aims to provide a quick 

glance at the lives and legacies of those who have made 

impactful change in the history of Security Cooperation. 

From our past into our future, we honor those whose 

contributions have shaped DSCA into the agency we 

know today.

William Henry Draper, Jr. was born on August 10, 

1894 in New York City.

After graduating from New York University with degrees 

in economics, Draper joined the U.S. Army and served as 

an Infantry Major during World War I. After the war, he 

worked as a banker and stayed in the Army Reserve.

In World War II, he took command of the 136th Infantry 

Regiment, 33rd Infantry Division. By the end of the war, 

Draper was promoted to Brigadier General, posted to 

Berlin and served as the Chief of the Economic Division, 

Allied Control Council for Germany. After being 

promoted to Major General, Draper served as the first 

Under Secretary of the Army. He would later serve as the 

first U.S. Ambassador to NATO.

Draper died on December 26, 1974 in Naples, FL.

THE NEW AGENCY ABOUT “FACES OF SECURITY

COOPERATION”

Faces of Security Cooperation
Northern Regional Office * 4800 Enterprise Way * Modesto, California 95356-8718 * (209) 557-6400 * FAX (209) 557-6475

Central Regional Office * 1990 East Gettysburg Avenue * Fresno, California 93726-0244 * (559) 230-5900 * FAX (559) 230-6061 

Southern Regional Office * 34946 Flyover Court * Bakersfield, California 93308 * (661) 392-5500 * FAX (661) 392-5585 

CMP-0 

Revised: January 2009 

San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District 

CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PRACTICES PLAN APPLICATION 

General Information 

A Conservation Management Practices (CMP) plan is a requirement for all agricultural operation sites as 

specified in Section 5.0 of District Rule 4550. The goal of this CMP plan is to reduce sources of PM10

emissions from agricultural operations. Note: The CMPs chosen in this plan must be implemented by July 

1, 2004. 

Name of Facility: 

Facility Location: 

Total Farm Acreage: 

City/State/Zip Code: 

Mailing Address: 

City/State/Zip code: 

Phone: Fax: 

Other (Cell): 

Person Responsible: Title: 

Signature: Date: 

Please list the following information for the persons responsible for: 

Plan Preparation: Plan Implementation: 

 Same as Person Responsible Above? Same as Person Responsible Above? 

Name: Name: 

Title: Title: 

Address: Address: 

City/State/Zip code: City/State/Zip code: 

Phone: Phone: 

Fax: Fax: 

Other (Cell): Other (Cell): 

FOR CMP PLAN EVALUATOR USE ONLY 

 This CMP plan application has been verified to contain all supporting information required by the APCO to evaluate the 

application. Checklist attached. 

Name: Title: Office Location: 

Signature: Date: Phone #: 

CMP 

0
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 912 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 912

     To amend the Native American Programs Act of 1974 to provide 
 flexibility and reauthorization to ensure the survival and continuing 
                 vitality of Native American languages.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 30, 2019

Mr. Lujan (for himself, Mr. Soto, Ms. McCollum, Mr. Young, Ms. Haaland, 
     Mr. Cole, Ms. Moore, Ms. Norton, Mr. Tipton, Mr. DeFazio, Mr. 
 O'Halleran, Mr. Grijalva, Mrs. Napolitano, Ms. Davids of Kansas, Mr. 
 Kildee, Mr. Cardenas, and Ms. Torres Small of New Mexico) introduced 
 the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education 
                               and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Native American Programs Act of 1974 to provide 
 flexibility and reauthorization to ensure the survival and continuing 
                 vitality of Native American languages.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Esther Martinez Native American 
Languages Programs Reauthorization Act''.

SEC. 2. NATIVE AMERICAN LANGUAGES GRANT PROGRAM.

    Section 803C of the Native American Programs Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 
2991b-3) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)(7)--
                    (A) in subparagraph (A)(i), by striking ``10'' and 
                inserting ``5''; and
                    (B) in subparagraph (B)(i), by striking ``15'' and 
                inserting ``10''; and
            (2) in subsection (e)(2)--
                    (A) by striking ``or 3-year basis'' and inserting 
                ``3-year, 4-year, or 5-year basis''; and
                    (B) by inserting ``, 4-year, or 5-year'' after ``on 
                a 3-year''.

SEC. 3. REAUTHORIZATION OF NATIVE AMERICAN LANGUAGES PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Section 816(e) of the Native American Programs Act 
of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 2992d(e)) is amended by striking ``such sums'' and 
all that follows through the period at the end and inserting 
``$13,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2020 through 2024.''.
    (b) Technical Correction.--Section 816 of the Native American 
Programs Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 2992d) is amended in subsections (a) 
and (b) by striking ``subsection (e)'' each place it appears and 
inserting ``subsection (d)''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     The Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
     financial statements for Liberty Tax Credit Plus L.P. and is qualified in
     its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000818020
<NAME>                        Liberty Tax Credit Plus L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-15-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 MAR-16-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-15-1998
<CASH>                                          15,000,600
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      572,881
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,382,914
<PP&E>                                         256,916,553
<DEPRECIATION>                                  83,096,110
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 193,816,353
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           28,906,265
<BONDS>                                        159,830,878
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,111,209
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   193,816,353
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,706,962
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,610,218
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,714,973
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2,618,229)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2,618,229)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (156.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0 
        

</TABLE>
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FEBRUARY 22, 2024

NO. 03-24-00052-CR

Rafael Antonio Rosado, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 368TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, TRIANA AND KELLY

DISMISSED ON APPELLANT’S MOTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE TRIANA

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Rafael Antonio 

Rosado has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. Therefore, the Court grants the motion, allows 

Rafael Antonio Rosado to withdraw his notice of appeal, and dismisses the appeal. Because 

appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         328,060
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,400
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               412,260
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 412,260
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           38,560
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     33,769
<COMMON>                                     3,232,418
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   412,260
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,195
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                       400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,240
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
# C_2023155EN.01005201.xml

| 2.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/52

---

Judgment of the General Court of 8 March 2023 — PS v EIB

(Case T-65/22) (1)

(Civil service - EIB staff - Social security - Insurance against the risk of accident and of occupational disease - Total and permanent invalidity - Occupational nature of the disease - Contract concluded with an insurance company - Extent of the obligations to be met by the EIB)

(2023/C 155/66)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: PS (represented by: S. Orlandi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Investment Bank (represented by: K. Carr and E. Manoukian, acting as Agents, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Re:

By his action under Article 270 TFEU and Article 50a of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, the applicant seeks, first, annulment of the decision of the European Investment Bank (EIB) of 12 July 2021, in so far as it refused the applicant payment of EUR 233 500 in respect of material and non-material damage suffered; second, an order that the EIB pay the applicant compensation in respect of the occupational disease from which he claims to be suffering; and, third, an order that the EIB pay the sum of EUR 24 000 as compensation in respect of the alleged non-material damage in view of the state of the applicant’s health.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders PS to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders PS to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 128, 21.3.2022.

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA

July 12, 2024

SC-2024-0309

Ex parte C.C. PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT 

OF CIVIL APPEALS (In re: C.C. v J.B. and M.B.) (Limestone Juvenile 

Court: JU-20-189.02; Civil Appeals: CL-2023-0770).

CERTIFICATE OF JUDGMENT

WHEREAS, the petition for writ of certiorari in the above 

referenced cause has been duly submitted and considered by the 

Supreme Court of Alabama and the judgment indicated below was 

entered in this cause on July 12, 2024:

Writ Denied. No Opinion. Cook, J. -- Parker, C.J., and Wise, 

Sellers, and Stewart, JJ., concur.

NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Rule 41, Ala. R. App. P., IT IS 

HEREBY ORDERED that this Court's judgment in this cause is certified 

on this date. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise ordered 

by this Court or agreed upon by the parties, the costs of this cause are 

hereby taxed as provided by Rule 35, Ala. R. App. P.

I, Megan B. Rhodebeck, certify that this is the record of the judgment of the Court, witness 

my hand and seal.

Clerk, Supreme Court of Alabama
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 934 

To amend the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 to 

include certain retirees in the Multiemployer Health Benefit Plan, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 31, 2019 

Mr. SCOTT of Virginia (for himself and Ms. WILSON of Florida) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act 

of 1977 to include certain retirees in the Multiemployer 

Health Benefit Plan, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Health Benefits for 

5 Miners Act of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 934 IH

1 SEC. 2. INCLUSION IN MULTIEMPLOYER HEALTH BENEFIT 

2 PLAN. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 402(h)(2)(C) of the Sur4 face Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (30 

5 U.S.C. 1232(h)(2)(C)) is amended— 

6 (1) by striking ‘‘the Health Benefits for Miners 

7 Act of 2017’’ both places it appears in clause (ii) 

8 and inserting ‘‘the Health Benefits for Miners Act 

9 of 2019’’; 

10 (2) by striking ‘‘, would be denied or reduced 

11 as a result of a bankruptcy proceeding commenced 

12 in 2012 or 2015’’ in clause (ii)(II) and inserting ‘‘or 

13 a related coal wage agreement, would be denied or 

14 reduced as a result of a bankruptcy proceeding com15 menced in 2012, 2015, or 2018’’; 

16 (3) by striking ‘‘January 1, 2017’’ in clause (ii) 

17 and inserting ‘‘January 1, 2019’’; and 

18 (4) by adding at the end the following new 

19 clause: 

20 ‘‘(vi) RELATED COAL WAGE AGREE21 MENT.—For purposes of clause (ii), the 

22 term ‘related coal wage agreement’ means 

23 an agreement between the United Mine 

24 Workers of America and an employer in 

25 the bituminous coal industry that— 

26 ‘‘(I) is a signatory operator; or 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 934 IH

1 ‘‘(II) is or was a debtor in a 

2 bankruptcy proceeding that was con3 solidated, administratively or other4 wise, with the bankruptcy proceeding 

5 of a signatory operator or a related 

6 person to a signatory operator (as 

7 those terms are defined in section 

8 9701(c) of the Internal Revenue Code 

9 of 1986).’’. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

11 this section shall apply to fiscal years beginning after Sep12 tember 30, 2018. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
No. 11-9874.

#### Bailey *v.*Tucker, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-10763.

#### Davis *v.*Kansas.

Ct. App. Kan. Certiorari denied.
# C_2022441EN.01002901.xml

| 21.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 441/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 441/29

---

Action brought on 4 October 2022 — SB v EEAS

(Case T-621/22)

(2022/C 441/40)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: SB (represented by: L. Burguin, T. Bontinck and A. Guillerme, lawyers)

Defendant: European External Action Service (EEAS)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | find that the EEAS is liable; |
| --- | --- |

—

find that the EEAS is liable;

| — | order the EEAS to pay the sum of EUR 80 000 in respect of non-material harm and EUR 720 000 in respect of material harm; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the EEAS to pay the sum of EUR 80 000 in respect of non-material harm and EUR 720 000 in respect of material harm;

| — | order the defence to bear the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defence to bear the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action against the two decisions of 10 November 2021 rejecting the applicant’s applications for the positions of Head of Delegation of the European Union, first, in [confidential] (1) and, second, in [confidential], the applicant relies on four pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging a manifest error of assessment. |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging a manifest error of assessment.

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging violation of the principle of legitimate expectations. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging violation of the principle of legitimate expectations.

| 3. | Third plea in law, alleging violation of the principle of equal treatment. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Third plea in law, alleging violation of the principle of equal treatment.

| 4. | Fourth plea in law, alleging the existence of a misuse of powers. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Fourth plea in law, alleging the existence of a misuse of powers.

---

(1)  Confidential information omitted.

---
# C_2022257EN.01004802.xml

| 4.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 257/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 257/48

---

Action brought on 20 May 2022 — Crush Series Publishing v EUIPO — Mediaproduccion (The Crush Series)

(Case T-295/22)

(2022/C 257/63)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Crush Series Publishing s.r.o. (Prague, Czech Republic) (represented by: D.-M. Belciu, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Mediaproduccion SLU (Barcelona, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark The Crush Series — Application for registration No 18 119 385

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 15 March 2022 in Case R 1303/2021-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | reject the opposition and allow the European Union trade mark application ‘The Crush Series’, No 18 119 385 to proceed to registration; |
| --- | --- |

—

reject the opposition and allow the European Union trade mark application ‘The Crush Series’, No 18 119 385 to proceed to registration;

| — | order EUIPO and the intervener to pay the costs incurred in the present proceedings and in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and the intervener to pay the costs incurred in the present proceedings and in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

| — | Infringement of Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---