alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EAC Decision on Request for Interpretation 2015-03

(Ballot Reading Accuracy)

VVSG 1.1 Volume 1: 4.1.5.2 Ballot Reading Accuracy

Date: 

September 9, 2015

Question: 

How should VSTLs conduct negative testing with different colored marking 

instruments?

Section of Guidelines:

VVSG 1.1 V1: 4.1.5.2

4.1.5.2 Ballot Reading Accuracy

This paper-based system requirement governs the conversion of the physical 

ballot into electronic data. Reading accuracy for ballot conversion refers to 

the ability to: 

a. Recognize vote punches or marks, or the absence thereof, for each 

possible selection on the ballot 

b. Discriminate between valid punches or marks and extraneous 

perforations, smudges, and folds 

c. Convert the vote punches or marks, or the absence thereof, for each 

possible selection on the ballot into digital signals 

To ensure accuracy, paper-based systems shall: 

d. Detect marks that conform to manufacturer specifications with an 

error rate that enables satisfaction of the system-level accuracy 

requirement indicated in Subsection 4.1.1 

e. Ignore, and not record, extraneous perforations, smudges, and folds
Discussion: 

EAC requires accuracy testing for mark reading in all campaigns. This RFI is 

an effort to clarify the process for negative testing of different colored 

marking instrument during the campaign. 

In previous campaigns, EAC and the VSTLs occasionally noted that certain 

colors are not read well and/or accurately by optical scan systems. The 

testing method proposed below is an effort to identify any colors that may 

not read accurately during VSTL testing.

Although it is not possible, due to time and financial concerns, to test every 

available marking instrument and color during a test campaign, EAC believes 

that doing a sampling of colors provides useful information to the 

manufacturers, EAC and voting system customers. 

Conclusion: 

EAC, the VSTL and the Manufacturer will work together early in a campaign 

to create a test ballot with marks filled in a range of colors. Once all parties 

agree on the ballot, this template may be used for future campaigns, if EAC 

determines reuse is acceptable.

One of each of the following colors must be used: red, orange, yellow, 

green, blue, indigo, violet, black, and gray. The manufacturer will identify 

the Pantone color used for each mark in their documentation; the lab will 

verify this during testing and document review. 

Applicability:

Immediate for all voting system applications submitted to VVSG 1.1.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR LIBERTY TAX CREDIT PLUS L.P. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000818020
<NAME> LIBERTY TAX CREDIT PLUS L.P.
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-15-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-16-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-15-2000
<CASH>                                      17,179,521
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  779,263
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,317,619
<PP&E>                                     258,851,816
<DEPRECIATION>                             104,314,413
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             177,346,104
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       34,765,655
<BONDS>                                    157,743,263
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                (15,162,814)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               177,346,104
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,259,942
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            16,498,010
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           6,764,030
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                               (4,776,750)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,776,750)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (295.79)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
# C_2022359EN.01001101.xml

| 19.9.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 359/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.9.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 359/11

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 1 August 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação de Évora — Portugal) — Criminal proceedings against TL

(Case C-242/22 PPU) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Urgent preliminary ruling procedure - Judicial cooperation in criminal matters - Directive 2010/64/EU - Right to interpretation and translation - Article 2(1) and Article 3(1) - Concept of an ‘essential document’ - Directive 2012/13/EU - Right to information in criminal proceedings - Article 3(1)(d) - Scope - Not implemented in domestic law - Direct effect - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Article 47 and Article 48(2) - European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms - Article 6 - Suspended prison sentence with probation - Breach of the probation conditions - Failure to translate an essential document and absence of an interpreter when that document was being drawn up - Revocation of the suspension of the prison sentence - Failure to translate the procedural acts relating to that revocation - Consequences for the validity of that revocation - Procedural defect resulting in relative nullity)

(2022/C 359/13)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Tribunal da Relação de Évora

Party in the main proceedings

TL

Intervening parties: Ministério Público

Operative part of the judgment

Article 2(1) and Article 3(1) of Directive 2010/64/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 October 2010 on the right to interpretation and translation in criminal proceedings and Article 3(1)(d) of Directive 2012/13/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2012 on the right to information in criminal proceedings, read in the light of Article 47 and Article 48(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and the principle of effectiveness, must be interpreted as precluding national legislation under which the infringement of the rights provided for by those provisions of those directives must be invoked by the beneficiary of those rights within a prescribed period, failing which that challenge will be time-barred, where that period begins to run before the person concerned has been informed, in a language which he or she speaks or understands, first, of the existence and scope of his or her right to interpretation and translation and, secondly, of the existence and content of the essential document in question and the effects thereof.

---

(1)  OJ C 257, 4.7.2022.

---
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

* * T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T KEI TH W AY NE SE KERKE, P la in tif

f - A p p e llan t, v. JA S O N S IL V A , D oct or, D ef

endant- A pp el l ee . N o. 10- 57011 D. C . No . 3 : 0 9 - c v - 0 0 3 6 0 - J AH J MA ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e S o u th e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia J ohn A . H ous t on, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d A pr i l 17, 2012 ** B efo re: L E A V Y , P A E Z , an dB E A , C i rcu i tJu d g es. K e i th W ay ne S e ke rke , aC a l i f orni as t a t e pr i s one r , appe a l s pr o s e f r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s s um m aryj udgm e nti n hi s 42 U . S . C . § 1983 a c t i on a l l e gi ng de l i be r a t e i ndi f

f e r e nc e t o hi s s e r i ous m e di c a l ne e ds . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 

# FI LED APR26 2 012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 57011 2 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o , T oguc hiv . Chung , 3 9 1 F .3 d1 0 5 1 , 1 0 5 6 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 4 ) , an dw e a f

f irm . T h e d istrict co u rt p ro p er ly g ra n tedsu m m ary ju d g m en t b ec au se S ek erk e’s e v id e n c e , in c lu d in g h is v e r if ie dc o m p la in t, f

a ile dto r a is e ag e n u in e d is p u te a s to w he the rde f

e nda ntS i l vaa c t e d w i th de l i be r a t e i ndi f f e r e nc e i n tr e a t i ng hi s i nf e c t i on a n dh e a d a c h e s . Se e i d. a t1057- 58, 1060 ( adi f f e r e nc e of opi ni on aboutthe pr e f e rr e d c our s e of

m e di c a l tr e a tm e ntdoe s notc ons t i tut e a n E i ghth A m e ndm e nt v io la tio n an da“s h o w in g o f m e d ic a l m a lp r a c tic e o rn e g lig e n c e is in s u f f ic ie n t to e s tab lis h ac o n s titu tio n a l d e p r iv a tio n ” ) . S e k e rk e ’s r e m a in in g c o n te n tio n s a r e u n p e r s u a s iv e . A FFI R M ED .
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                              AUG-2-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,610
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,089
<ALLOWANCES>                                       239
<INVENTORY>                                     31,172
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                45,201
<PP&E>                                          30,636
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,242
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  67,058
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,802
<BONDS>                                         19,958
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,073
<OTHER-SE>                                      38,133
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    67,058
<SALES>                                         93,475
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                93,475
<CGS>                                           61,378
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   61,378
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                28,902
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 623
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,572
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,009
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,563
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                           50
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,513
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $0.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.25
        

</TABLE>
Strategic Integration Directorate (SI)
Unclassified

Three Integrated Lines of Effort

• Plans and Exercises (PLEX) – Organized around the 2+3 NDS threats; develop 

cohesive agency approach to enable CCMD objectives, counter NDS threats, and 

increase mission effectiveness

• Strategic Trends and Effects (STED) – Insights into effects DTRA may be able to 

generate against emerging threats; assess the collective effects of DTRA OAIs 

within the operating environment

• Comptroller – Strategic resourcing of OAIs to meet the demand signals of the 

warfighter within a dynamic fiscal and threat environment

2

Strategic Integration (SI) Directorate

The Strategic Integration Directorate shapes DTRA’s response to the challenges and priorities set forth in the 

National Defense Strategy, focusing the Agency’s operations, activities and investments in a manner that 

maximizes their cumulative effect in support of our warfighting customers.
Unclassified 3

• Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction (CWMD) Planning

• Advisory and Assistance Services (A&AS) CWMD planners

• Joint CWMD Planning Course (JCPC) instructors

• Countering Violent Extremist Organizations (VEO) Planning

• A&AS VEO planners

• Joint Training and CWMD Exercises

• A&AS Joint Training Systems Specialists and Exercise planners

• Strategic Requirements Specialists

• A&AS Requirements Specialists

• Opportunity Analysis Professionals

• Requirements include specialties: intelligence, design analysis, analytical 

tools

Plans and Exercises
Strategic Trends and Effects Department (SI-ST)

• Strategic Trends Division (SI-STT)

• A&AS Professional Staff Support

• Acquisition Administration Support

• Event Coordinators

• Tabletop Exercise Facilitators

• WMD / Emerging Threat Analysts

• Graphics / Web / SharePoint Designers

• Strategic Effects Division (SI-STE)

• Operations Research Analysts

• Statisticians

• Strategic Assessment Experts

• Data Analysis and Visualization Professionals

4
Unclassified 5

• Financial Management Support

• Budget

• Finance

• Accounting

• Audit

• Cost Analysis

Comptroller
• Media Relations

• Agency Messaging and Branding

• Web Design / Content Management

• Video Production

• Social Media Management

• Photography Support

• Graphic Design

Public Affairs and External Communications
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer**

**Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002**

 

I, Burton M. Tansky, certifythat:

 

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The NeimanMarcus Group, Inc.;

 

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)     designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

b)     evaluated the effectivenessof the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

c)     disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfirst fiscal quarter) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

 

5.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a)     all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

b)     any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: December 8, 2003

 

 
|   | /s/  BURTON M. TANSKY                             |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | **Burton M. Tansky  President and Chief Executive Officer** |

 

----
September 10, 2012

No. 11-1538.

#### Eckstein Marine Service, L. L. C., nka Marquette Transportation Company Gulf-Inland, L. L. C. *v.*
      *966Jackson.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari dismissed under this Court’s Rule 46.1.
# C_2022119EN.01005501.xml

| 14.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 119/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 119/55

---

Action brought on 28 January 2022 — Santos v EUIPO (Shape of a citrus press)

(Case T-51/22)

(2022/C 119/78)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Santos (Vaulx-en-Velin, France) (represented by: C. Bey, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: Application for a three-dimensional EU trade mark (Shape of a citrus press), claiming the colours (yellow Pantone 1235 C; green NCS S 3050-G50Y) — Application for registration No 18 005 754

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 November 2021 in Case R 281/2020-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs, including those incurred by the applicant for the purposes of the proceedings before the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs, including those incurred by the applicant for the purposes of the proceedings before the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 165(2) and (5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Article 36 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 and Article 7 of Decision 2020-7 of the Presidium of the Boards of Appeal concerning the organisation of the Boards; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 165(2) and (5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Article 36 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 and Article 7 of Decision 2020-7 of the Presidium of the Boards of Appeal concerning the organisation of the Boards;

| — | Infringement of Article 7 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the use in this Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement No.
333-34067 of Group Maintenance America Corp. on Form S-1 of our report dated
July 24, 1997 (relating to the financial statements of Masters, Inc.) appearing
in the Prospectus, which is part of this Registration Statement.

We also consent to the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in such 
Prospectus.



/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Washington, D.C.

October 9, 1997
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________ NO. 09-14-00144-CR NO. 09-14-00145-CR NO. 09-14-00146-CR NO. 09-14-00147-CR



### ____________________ BLAZE DANIEL HICKS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TE XAS, Appellee

________________ __________________ __________________ ___ ______________ On Appeal from the County Court Hardin County, Texas Trial Cause Nos. 64136, 65507, 65508, and 65509

________________ __________________ ______________________ _____________ MEMORANDUM OPINION Blaze Daniel Hicks has filed a motion to dismiss his appeals. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2. A request to dismiss the a ppeal is signed by appellant personally and joined by counsel of record. No opinion ha s issued in these appeals. The motion is granted, and the appeals are therefore dismissed.

APPEALS DISMISSED.2 _______ _________________________ CHARLES KREGER Justice

Submitted on November 10, 2014 Opinion Delivered November 12, 2014 Do Not Publish Before Kreger, Horton, and Johnson, JJ.
<PAGE>   1

                                   EXHIBIT 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

Parent

Ramapo Financial Corporation
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                   State or Other
                                                   Jurisdiction of        Percentage
Subsidiaries (1)                                   Incorporation          Ownership
----------------                                   ---------------        ----------
<S>                                                <C>                    <C>
The Ramapo Bank (2)                                  New Jersey                100%
RFC High Ridge, Inc.                                 New Jersey                100%
RFC Harmony Park, Inc.                               New Jersey                100%
RFC CKN, Inc.                                        New Jersey                100%
RFC National, Inc.                                   New Jersey                100%
RFC Center Plaza, Inc.                               New Jersey                100%
RFC High Debi Hills, Inc.                            New Jersey                100%
RFC Jefferson, Inc.                                  New Jersey                100%
RFC Deer Trail Development, Inc.                     New Jersey                100%
Ramapo Investment Corporation                        New Jersey                100%
Bancorps' International Trading Corporation (2)      New Jersey               33.3%

</TABLE>

-------------------
(1)   Except for Bancorps' International Trading Corporation, which is accounted
      for using the equity method of accounting, the assets, liabilities and
      operations of the subsidiaries are included in the consolidated financial
      statements contained in Item 8 hereof. Unless otherwise indicated, all
      subsidiaries are subsidiaries of the Bank.

(2)   Subsidiary of the Corporation.











                                       25