alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5
<LEGEND>
         THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
         UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999
         AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
         STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>

<S>                                 <C>                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       6-MOS                     6-MOS
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-1999               JAN-01-1998
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1998               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                        JUN-30-1999               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                              5,678,000                 11,148,000
<SECURITIES>                        0                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                       17,271,000                12,398,000
<ALLOWANCES>                        431,000                   426,000
<INVENTORY>                         9,712,000                 6,926,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    35,929,000                33,052,000
<PP&E>                              8,018,000                 5,187,000
<DEPRECIATION>                      0                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      49,420,000                43,590,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               13,882,000                13,400,000
<BONDS>                             0                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0                         0
<PREFERRED>                         0                         0
<COMMON>                            54,000                    54,000
<OTHER-SE>                          31,825,000                27,363,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        49,420,000                43,590,000
<SALES>                             37,719,000                31,296,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    37,719,000                31,296,000
<CGS>                               22,601,000                18,986,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       34,104,000                28,322,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    234,000                   (260,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    0                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  106,000                   80,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     3,381,000                 3,234,000
<INCOME-TAX>                        1,191,000                 1,164,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 0                         0
<DISCONTINUED>                      0                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0                         0
<CHANGES>                           0                         0
<NET-INCOME>                        2,190,000                 2,070,000
<EPS-BASIC>                       .40                       .38
<EPS-DILUTED>                       .40                       .37


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.4







January 24, 2006



Insight Corporation

4651 Roswell Road, Suite B-106

Atlanta, Georgia 30356





Dear Sirs,





RE:

Consulting Agreement dated November 22, 2004 (the Agreement)





Pursuant to paragraph 3 of the Agreement and the instructions of Insight Corporation (Insight), DataJungle Software Inc. (DataJungle or the Company) issued warrants as follows:



Series A

Asian Development Consortium, Inc.

750,000

Series A

Pacific Management Services, LLC

750,000

Series B

Synergistic Affiliates, Inc.

750,000

Series B

Windstar Corporation

750,000



Pursuant to paragraph 12 of the Agreement, we hereby serve notice of our intention to terminate the Agreement, effective immediately, and to retract and to cancel the 1,500,000 Series B warrants issued.



As consideration for arranging for the immediate forfeiture and cancellation of the 1,500,000 Series A warrants, DataJungle shall pay to Insight a total of 305,000 shares of restricted common stock of the Company.  These shares have not been registered under the Securities Act of 1933 (the Act), and accordingly are "restricted securities" within the meaning of Rule 144 of the Act.



If you are in agreement with the above terms and conditions, please:

1.

sign a copy of this letter and return it to us:

2.

execute the attached Subscription Agreement and return it to us; and

3.

immediately return all of the Series A and Series B warrants for cancellation.



Upon receipt of the above we will immediately provide instructions to our transfer agent to issue the appropriate shares to Insight.



Yours truly,

DataJungle Software Inc.









/s/ Edward J. Munden

/s/ Larry Bruce

______________________________

______________________________

Name:  Edward J. Munden

Name:

Larry Bruce

Title:     President and CEO

Title:

CFO

1





---

We hereby accept the terms and conditions of this letter on this 24th day of January 2006.



Insight Corporation

_____________________________

Name: /s/ Lynette Laser

Title:  Vice President



Asian Development Consortium, Inc.

Pacific Management Services, LLC

______________________________

_____________________________

Name:

/s/ Lynette Laser

Name: /s/ Lynette Laser

Title:  Vice President

Title:  Managing Director



Synergistic Affiliates, Inc.

Windstar Corporation

______________________________

_____________________________

Name:

/s/ Lynette Laser

Name: /s/ Lynette Laser

Title: Vice President

Title:  Vice President















2
No. 11-10872.

#### Coleman *v.*Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# C_2022213EN.01004501.xml

| 30.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 213/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 213/45

---

Action brought on 12 April 2022 — BPCE and Others v ECB

(Case T-187/22)

(2022/C 213/62)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: BPCE (Paris, France) and the 51 other applicants (represented by: A. Gossett-Grainville, M. Trabucchi and M. Dalon, lawyers)

Defendant: European Central Bank

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:

| — | annul section 1.3 and sections 3.3.1 to 3.3.8 of ECB decision No ECB-SSM-2022-FRBPC-10 of 2 February 2022 (together with its annexes), in so far as it prescribes measures to be taken in relation to irrevocable payment commitments concerning deposit guarantee schemes or resolution funds; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul section 1.3 and sections 3.3.1 to 3.3.8 of ECB decision No ECB-SSM-2022-FRBPC-10 of 2 February 2022 (together with its annexes), in so far as it prescribes measures to be taken in relation to irrevocable payment commitments concerning deposit guarantee schemes or resolution funds;

| — | order the defendant to pay all the costs |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay all the costs

| — | adopt, under Articles 88 and 89 of the Rules of Procedure, a measure of organisation of procedure seeking to have the ECB communicate the decisions concerning irrevocable payment commitments taken in respect of other banking institutions for 2021, particularly those relating to the other French banking institutions. |
| --- | --- |

—

adopt, under Articles 88 and 89 of the Rules of Procedure, a measure of organisation of procedure seeking to have the ECB communicate the decisions concerning irrevocable payment commitments taken in respect of other banking institutions for 2021, particularly those relating to the other French banking institutions.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants rely on four pleas in law which are identical or similar to those relied upon in Case T-186/22, BNP Paribas v European Central Bank.

---
# C_2023286EN.01001101.xml

| 14.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 286/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 286/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 29 June 2023 — Airoldi Metalli SpA v European Commission

(Case C-467/22 P) (1)

(Appeal - Dumping - Imports of aluminium extrusions originating in the People’s Republic of China - Definitive anti-dumping duty - Action for annulment - Locus standi - Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU - Condition that the measure must be of individual concern to the applicant - Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures)

(2023/C 286/12)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Airoldi Metalli SpA (represented by: M. Campa, M. Pirovano, D. Rovetta, V. Villante, avvocati, and P. Gjørtler, advokat)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: G. Luengo and P. Němečková, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Airoldi Metalli SpA to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Airoldi Metalli SpA to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 326, 29.8.2022.

---
|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| 1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. for the fiscal year end December 31, 2017; and |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|               |
|---------------|
|               |  |
| March 5, 2018 | /s/ Leslie C. Kass |
|          | Leslie C. Kass |
|          | President and Chief Executive Officer |
#### REACHLOCAL, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PPC CLAIM LIMITED, a British limited company; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 16-56644

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted February 13, 2018 *

Filed February 22, 2018

*569Paul Fricke, I, Esquire, Amjad Mah-mood Khan, Attorney, Rowennakete Paul Barnes, Esquire, Brown Neri Smith & Khan LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant

Kieran Paul Cassidy, Pro Se

Before: LEAVY, FERNANDEZ, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R, App. P, 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

ReachLocal, Inc. appeals from the district court’s order dismissing sua sponte for failure to prosecute ReachLocal’s diversity action alleging state law claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion, *Oliva v. Sullivan,*958 F.2d 272, 274 (9th Cir. 1992), and we reverse and remand.

The district court dismissed ReachLocal’s action for failure to prosecute at a status conference attended by counsel for both parties. In doing so, the district court abused its discretion because it failed to warn ReachLocal of the possibility of dismissal, and did not consider less drastic alternatives. *See id.*at 273-74.

We deny ReachLocal’s request for reassignment to a different district judge on remand. *See Krechman v. County, of Riverside,*723 F.3d 1104, 1111-12 (9th Cir. 2013) (setting forth factors warranting reassignment).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
#### Francisco Eliezer Palafox PADILLA, AKA Hector Lopez, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 14-73238

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted February 12, 2018 Pasadena, California

Filed February 28, 2018

John Martin Pope, Benjamin Wiesinger, Pope & Associates, PC, Phoenix, AZ, for Petitioner

Allison Frayer, Jesse David Lorenz, Esquire, Trial Attorney, DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent

Before: McKEOWN and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges, and QUIST,* District Judge.

*

 The Honorable Gordon J. Quist, United States District Judge for the Western District of *724Michigan, sitting by designation.

*724MEMORANDUM **

Francisco Eliezer Palafox Padilla, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny the petition in part, grant it in part, and remand.

1. Asylum Claim

Whether or not Palafox addressed every reason for the Board’s finding that his asylum application was untimely, Palafox’s opening brief clearly challenged that finding and thus preserved the issue for appeal. *See Brown v. Rawson-Neal Psych. Hosp.,*840 F.3d 1146, 1149 (9th Cir. 2016) (“We ... reasonably require parties to preserve valid issues in order to conserve judicial resources and to assist our review.”).

The BIA properly concluded that Pala-fox’s . application for asylum was time-barred. Although a delay of six months after the expiration of lawful nonimmi-grant status is “presumptively reasonable,” *Singh v. Holder,*656 F.3d 1047, 1056 (9th Cir. 2011), a nine- to eleven-year delay is not. Ignorance of asylum law is not a special consideration excusing Palafox’s delay in filing. *See Antonio-Martinez v. INS,*317 F.3d 1089, 1093 (9th Cir. 2003) (“As a general rule, ignorance of the law is no excuse.”). Therefore, Palafox’s petition for review challenging the BIA’s denial of his application for asylum is denied.

2. Withholding op Removal and Cat Protection Claims

With respect to Palafox’s petition for review of his claims for withholding of removal and CAT protection, we grant and remand to the BIA to consider Palafox’s eligibility in light of our intervening decisions in *Barajas-Romero v. Lynch,*846 F.3d 351 (9th Cir. 2017), and *Bringas-Rodriguez v. Sessions,*850 F.3d 1051 (9th Cir. 2017) (en banc). Neither the BIA nor the parties had the benefit of these decisions.

Each party shall bear its own costs on appeal.

PETITION DENIED in part, GRANTED in part, and REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-1305
TACITUS A. HALL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WELLA CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-96-933) Submitted: February 12, 1998 Decided: February 24, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tacitus A. Hall, Appellant Pro Se. James Phillip Naughton, HUNTON & WILLIAMS, Richmond, Virginia; Sharon Smith Goodwyn, HUNTON & WILLIAMS, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his employment discrimination suit as untimely. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hall v. Wella Corp. , No. CA-96-933 (E.D. Va. Mar. 4, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 11-10498.

#### Burgest *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
ex10a.htm



























Exhibit 10(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 21 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-141756) pertaining to Lincoln Life & Annuity Variable Annuity Account H, which is incorporated by reference into Post-Effective Amendment No. 10 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-171097) and Amendment No. 242 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-08441), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) April 1, 2014, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New York and (b) April 1, 2014, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life & Annuity Variable Annuity Account H for the registration of interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.








/s/ Ernst & Young LLP












Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


April 1, 2014
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 51 (Monday, March 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 12685]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6493]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Proposed Collection: Comment Request

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Treasury, as part of its continuing 
effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general 
public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment 
on proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 (44 U.S.C. 
3506(c)(2)(A). Currently the Bureau of the Public Debt within the 
Department of the Treasury is soliciting comments concerning the Order 
For Series EE U.S. Savings Bonds, and Order For Series EE U.S. Savings 
Bonds To Be Registered In Name Of Fiduciary.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before May 13, 1997, 
to be assured of consideration.

ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments to Bureau of the Public Debt, 
Vicki S. Thorpe, 200 Third Street, Parkersburg, WV 26106-1328.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or 
copies of the form and instructions should be directed to Vicki S. 
Thorpe, Bureau of the Public Debt, 200 Third Street, Parkersburg, WV 
26106-1328, (304) 480-6553.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    Title: Order For Series EE U.S. Savings Bonds and Order For Series 
EE U.S. Savings Bonds To Be Registered In Name of Fiduciary.
    OMB Number: 1535-0084.
    Form Number: PD F 5263 and
5263-1.
    Abstract: The information is requested from the purchaser to issue 
Series EE Savings Bonds.
    Current Actions: None.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 10,000,000.
    Estimated Time Per Respondent: 5 minutes.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 830,000.

Request for Comments

    Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized 
and/or included in the request for OMB approval. All comments will 
become a matter of public record. Comments are invited on: (a) Whether 
the collection of information is necessary for the proper performance 
of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall 
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of 
the burden of the collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the 
quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; (d) 
ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on 
respondents, including through the use of automated collection 
techniques or other forms of information technology; and (e) estimates 
of capital or start-up costs and costs of operation, maintenance, and 
purchase of services to provide information.

    Dated: March 10, 1997.
Vicki S. Thorpe,
Manager, Graphics, Printing and Records Branch.
[FR Doc. 97-6493 Filed 3-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-39-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA) CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL
INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER
ended MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                           1000

<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                              Sep-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                                   Mar-31-1999
<CASH>                                                                 287
<SECURITIES>                                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                        1,685
<ALLOWANCES>                                                          (177)
<INVENTORY>                                                          4,321
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                     6,509
<PP&E>                                                               4,479
<DEPRECIATION>                                                      (1,767)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                       9,603
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                2,614
<BONDS>                                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                                              0
<COMMON>                                                               107
<OTHER-SE>                                                           5,390
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                         9,603
<SALES>                                                              2,769
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                     2,769
<CGS>                                                                1,640
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                        1,640
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                     1,487
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                      47
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                       (405)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                   (405)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                                          (405)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                        (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                         0.00



</TABLE>