alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Provident Bankshares
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Dennis A.
Starliper, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
             15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
             material respects, the financial condition and results of
             operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the
             Report.


                                        /s/ Dennis A. Starliper
                                        ---------------------------------
                                        Dennis A. Starliper
                                        Chief Financial Officer

May 10, 2005
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

MATTHEW JOHN DEVINS,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 15-30253

D.C. No. 4:14-cr-06051-SMJ

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Washington

Salvador Mendoza, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 13, 2016** 

Before: FARRIS, TALLMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Matthew John Devins appeals from the revocation of supervised release and

six-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967), Devins’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no

grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have

FILED

APR 18 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
provided Devins the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se

supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. 

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.

2 15-30253
No. 11-11038.

#### Davis *v.*McDuffie.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# C_2022244EN.01002001.xml

| 27.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 244/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 244/20

---

Appeal brought on 18 April 2022 by QI, QJ, QL, QM, QN, QP, QQ, QT, QU, QW, QX against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 9 February 2022 in Case T-868/16, QI and Others v Commission and ECB

(Case C-262/22 P)

(2022/C 244/25)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellants: QI, QJ, QL, QM, QN, QP, QQ, QT, QU, QW, QX (represented by: S. Pappas, A. Pappas, avocats)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission, European Central Bank, Council of the European Union, European Council, QK, QO, QR, QS, QV

Form of order sought

The Appellants claim that the Court should:

| — | set aside the judgment under appeal; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the judgment under appeal;

| — | refer the case back to the General Court; |
| --- | --- |

—

refer the case back to the General Court;

| — | order the defendants to pay their own costs and the costs of the Appellants in the present proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendants to pay their own costs and the costs of the Appellants in the present proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

With the present appeal, the Appellants respectfully request the Court of Justice to review and set aside the appealed judgment, on the basis of two grounds:

First, that the General Court performed an inadequate examination of the third plea of illegality of the application, alleging a sufficiently serious breach of the right to property guaranteed by Article 17(1) of the Charter. In turn, this improper examination resulted in the misapplication and infringement of the Appellants’ right to property.

Second, that the General Court infringed the principle of proportionality.

---
Submitted June 29;

in Case No. 15CR18929, convictions for first-degree burglary and second-degree criminal mischief reversed and remanded, in Case No. 15CR28197, remanded for resentencing, otherwise affirmed August 23, 2017

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Plaintiff-Respondent, v.*REGENALD LEE BURNS, *Defendant-Appellant.*

Multnomah County Circuit Court

15CR18929, 15CR28197; A160727 (Control), A160728

401 P3d 295

Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Erica Herb, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant.

Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Jamie K. Contreras, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Garrett, Presiding Judge, and Lagesen, Judge, and Edmonds, Senior Judge.

*460PER CURIAM

After his cases were joined for trial, defendant was convicted of first-degree burglary, second-degree criminal mischief, and witness tampering. In this consolidated appeal, he argues that the trial court erred by instructing the jury that it could consider the victim’s out-of-court statements to a 9-1-1 dispatcher and police officer as substantive evidence. The state concedes that the court erred in that regard, because the statements, which were not made under oath, were admissible only to impeach the victim’s trial testimony and not as substantive evidence. However, the state argues that the error was harmless as to the conviction for witness tampering.

We agree with the state as to the concession and on the issue of harmlessness. Accordingly, we reverse and remand with regard to the convictions for first-degree burglary and second-degree criminal mischief, but we affirm the conviction for witness tampering. Although defendant also challenges his sentence on the conviction for witness tampering, we need not address those challenges because the entire case must be remanded for resentencing as a result of the reversal of the other convictions. *State v. Sheikh-Nur,*285 Or App 529, 539, 398 P3d 472 (2017) (“[T]he legislature understood, when it enacted ORS 138.222(5)(b), that the statute would require resentencing on remand of convictions on all charges tried together with a charge for which a conviction is reversed on appeal, including charges consolidated for trial after the initial filing of separate charging instruments.”).

In Case No. 15CR18929, convictions for first-degree burglary and second-degree criminal mischief reversed and remanded. In Case No. 15CR28197, remanded for resentenc-ing; otherwise affirmed.
# C_2022119EN.01005401.xml

| 14.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 119/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 119/54

---

Action brought on 21 January 2022 — Sanrio v EUIPO — Miroglio Fashion (SANRIO CHARACTERS)

(Case T-43/22)

(2022/C 119/76)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Sanrio Co. Ltd (Tokyo, Japan) (represented by: V. Schmitz-Fohrmann, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Miroglio Fashion Srl (Alba, Italy)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark SANRIO CHARACTERS — Application for registration No 12 565 974

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 November 2021 in Case R 2460/2020-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision to the extent the opposition was upheld and European Union trade mark application No 12 565 974 was rejected and to reject the opposition in its entirety; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision to the extent the opposition was upheld and European Union trade mark application No 12 565 974 was rejected and to reject the opposition in its entirety;

| — | order EUIPO to bear the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to bear the costs of the proceedings.

Plea in law

| — | The Board of Appeal made an incorrect global assessment of the likelihood of confusion between the trade marks. |
| --- | --- |

—

The Board of Appeal made an incorrect global assessment of the likelihood of confusion between the trade marks.

---
# C_2023235EN.01003602.xml

| 3.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 235/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 235/36

---

Judgment of the General Court of 17 May 2023 — Panicongelados-Massas Congeladas v EUIPO — Seder (panidor)

(Case T-480/22) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark panidor - Earlier national word mark ANIDOR - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2023/C 235/49)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Panicongelados-Massas Congeladas, SA (Leiria, Portugal) (represented by: I. Monteiro Alves, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Ringelhann and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Seder Establishment Limited (Mriehel Birkirkara, Malta)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 11 May 2022 (Case R 1946/2021-2).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 359, 19.9.2022.

---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 141 (Wednesday, July 23, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 39438-39439]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-55555]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

19 CFR Part 201


Initiation and Conduct of Investigations

CFR Correction

    In Title 19 of the Code of Federal Regulations, parts 200 to end, 
revised as of April 1, 1997, make the following correction.
    On page 21, the text of Sec. 201.7 is incorrect. The text should 
appear as follows:


Sec. 201.7  Investigative authority and initiation of investigations.

    (a) Investigative authority. In order to expedite the performance 
of its functions, the Commission may engage in investigative activities 
preliminary to and in aid of any authorized

[[Page 39439]]

investigation, consolidate proceedings before it, and determine the 
scope and manner of its proceedings;
    (b) Initiation of investigations. Investigations may be initiated 
by the Commission on the Commission's own motion, upon request of the 
President or the Special Representative for Trade Negotiations, upon 
resolution of the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of 
Representatives or the Committee on Finance of the Senate, upon 
resolution of either branch of Congress, or upon application, petition, 
complaint, or request of private parties, as required or provided for 
in the pertinent statute, Presidential proclamation, Executive Order, 
or in this chapter.

[44 FR 76476, Dec. 26, 1979]

[FR Doc. 97-55555 Filed 7-22-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 51 (Monday, March 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 12645]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6671]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY
[FEMA-1161-DR]


South Dakota; Major Disaster and Related Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for the State of South Dakota (FEMA-1161-DR), dated February 
28, 1997, and related determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: February 28, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3260.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that, in a letter 
dated February 28, 1997, the President declared a major disaster under 
the authority of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency 
Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.), as follows:

    I have determined that the damage in certain areas of the State 
of South Dakota, resulting from a severe winter storm beginning on 
November 13, 1996, and continuing through November 26, 1996, is of 
sufficient severity and magnitude to warrant a major disaster 
declaration under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and 
Emergency Assistance Act (''the Stafford Act''). I, therefore, 
declare that such a major disaster exists in the State of South 
Dakota.
    In order to provide Federal assistance, you are hereby 
authorized to allocate from funds available for these purposes, such 
amounts as you find necessary for Federal disaster assistance and 
administrative expenses.
    You are authorized to provide Public Assistance and Hazard 
Mitigation in the designated areas. Consistent with the requirement 
that Federal assistance be supplemental, any Federal funds provided 
under the Stafford Act for Public Assistance or Hazard Mitigation 
will be limited to 75 percent of the total eligible costs.

    The time period prescribed for the implementation of section 
310(a), Priority to Certain Applications for Public Facility and Public 
Housing Assistance, 42 U.S.C. 5153, shall be for a period not to exceed 
six months after the date of this declaration.
    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the authority vested in the 
Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency under Executive 
Order 12148, I hereby appoint Roger E. Free of the Federal Emergency 
Management Agency to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this 
declared disaster.
    I do hereby determine the following areas of the State of South 
Dakota to have been affected adversely by this declared major disaster:

The counties of Butte, Harding, Hutchinson, Lake, Meade, Minnehaha, 
Moody, Pennington, Perkins and Turner for Public Assistance and 
Hazard Mitigation.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 83.516, Disaster 
Assistance)
James L. Witt,
Director.
[FR Doc. 97-6671 Filed 3-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
the Form 10-K for the twelve months ended December 31, 1996 and is qualified 
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                           JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         5,643
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                193,987
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   0
<PP&E>                                     2,153,363
<DEPRECIATION>                                97,574
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             2,282,432
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              0
<BONDS>                                      797,188
<COMMON>                                      75,511
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                  267,374
<OTHER-SE>                                   924,623
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               2,282,432
<SALES>                                      322,046
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             326,246
<CGS>                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                128,122
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            35,288
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              106,544
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          107,414
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (870)
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                 106,544
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   1.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   1.46
        

</TABLE>
**Data Provided by FEMA on Emergency Transportable Housing Unit Group Sites**

**Disaster Group Site** **s Constructed by FEMA Total Units**  **UFAS Units UFAS %**  1791 Acadian Annex, High Island , and Schreiber Field 1 134 18 13.4% 1838 Parks Manor 37 3 8.1% RA West 16 0 0% 1980 Fountain Road Village 53 0 0% Hope Haven 152 8 5.3% Hope Haven 2 35 3 8.6% Officer Jeff Taylor Memorial Park 192 26 13.5% 1981 De Sour Valley Heights, Recovery Village, and Virgil Workman 1, 2 and 3 1 666 73 11.0% 4019 Group Site 53 3 5.7% 4030 Austin Family 34 1 3.0% Highfields 23 0 0%
1 Data not available on number and type of units installed at each group site.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             687
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,721
<PP&E>                                          74,210
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (25,014)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  61,387
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,358
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (12,255)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    61,387
<SALES>                                          2,911
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,019
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,053
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (865)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (851)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (851)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (851)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.84)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.84)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 59 (Monday, March 28, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 17181]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7177]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Agency Information Collection Activities: Requests for Comments; 
Clearance of Renewed Approval of Information Collection: SWIFT Customer 
Satisfaction Survey

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, FAA 
invites public comments about our intention to request the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) approval to renew an information 
collection. This collection of information is necessary to determine 
how satisfied applicants are with the automated staffing solution. The 
information enables the FAA to improve and enhance its automated 
staffing process.

DATES: Written comments should be submitted by May 27, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carla Scott on (202) 267-9895, or by 
e-mail at: Carla.Scott@faa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    OMB Control Number: 2120-0699.
    Title: SWIFT Customer Satisfaction Survey.
    Form Numbers: There are no FAA forms associated with this 
collection.
    Type of Review: Renewal of an information collection.
    Background: The information will be collected via an online form. 
It is part of the automated SWIFT staffing tool. The data collected is 
analyzed by Information Systems Division, AHP-100 to determine the 
quality of our service to our users and customers, to address any 
problems or issues found as a result of the data analysis.
    Respondents: Approximately 50,000 applicants.
    Frequency: Information is collected on occasion.
    Estimated Average Burden per Response: 3 minutes.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 2,500 hours.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to the FAA at the following address: Ms. Carla 
Scott, Room 712, Federal Aviation Administration, IT Enterprises 
Business Services Division, AES-200, 800 Independence Ave., SW., 
Washington, DC 20591.
    Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspect of 
this information collection, including (a) Whether the proposed 
collection of information is necessary for FAA's performance; (b) the 
accuracy of the estimated burden; (c) ways for FAA to enhance the 
quality, utility and clarity of the information collection; and (d) 
ways that the burden could be minimized without reducing the quality of 
the collected information. The agency will summarize and/or include 
your comments in the request for OMB's clearance of this information 
collection.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on March 21, 2011.
Carla Scott,
FAA Information Collection Clearance Officer, IT Enterprises Business 
Services Division, AES-200.
[FR Doc. 2011-7177 Filed 3-25-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```