alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 16.1


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 5th Street N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

We have read and agree with the comments in Item 4 of Form 8-K of Boots & Coots 
International Well Control, Inc. (formerly Havenwood Ventures, Inc.) of August 
13, 1997.

/s/ Cordovano and Company, P.C.
    
Cordovano and Company, P.C.
Denver, Colorado
August 13, 1997
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 47 (Tuesday, March 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 11164]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5931]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. TM97-2-21-000]


Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation; Notice of Proposed Changes 
in FERC Gas Tariff

March 5, 1997.
    Take notice that on February 28, 1997, Columbia Gas Transmission 
Corporation (Columbia), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the revised tariff sheets listed 
below, with an effective date of April 1, 1997.

Settlement Rates

Fifth Revised Sheet No. 44

Collection Rates

First Revised Sheet No. 44A

    In accordance with the Commission's order issued January 29, 1997 
in Docket No. RP95-408, et al. (78 FERC para. 61,071), the Settlement 
Rates implement the lower settlement rates pending Commission action on 
the November 22, 1996, settlement in Docket No. RP95-408, et al., and 
the Collection Rates are applicable to customers' not wanting to be 
subject to surcharge conditions associated with paying the Settlement 
Rates.
    The proposed changes constitute Columbia's annual filing pursuant 
to the provisions of Section 35, ``Retainage Adjustment Mechanism'', of 
the General Terms and Conditions (GTC) of its tariff. Third Revised 
Sheet No. 44 sets forth the retainage factors applicable to Columbia's 
transportation, storage, processing and gathering services.
    Columbia states that copies of this filing have been served upon 
all of its firm customers, and interested State Commissions. Moreover, 
all interruptible customers having submitted a standing request for 
such filings were also served.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-5931 Filed 3-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 11-10247.

#### Mullins *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



I, James A. Bowman, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarter report on Form 10-Q of National Housing Trust Limited Partnership;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being
prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                  |  |    |  |                                           
|----------------- |  | -- |  | ------------------------------------------
|Date May 17, 2004 |  | By |  | /s/ James A. Bowman                       
|                  |  |    |  | James A. Bowman, President                
|                  |  |    |  | and Chief Executive Officer               
|                  |  |    |  | NHT, Inc., General Partner for            
|                  |  |    |  | National Housing Trust Limited Partnership
# C_2023035EN.01002602.xml

| 30.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 35/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 35/26

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Gelderland (Netherlands) lodged on 12 October 2022 — Stichting Pensioenfonds voor Fysiotherapeuten v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst Maastricht

(Case C-642/22)

(2023/C 35/31)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Rechtbank Gelderland

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Stichting Pensioenfonds voor Fysiotherapeuten

Defendant: Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst Maastricht

Question referred

Must Article 135(1)(g) of the VAT Directive (1) be interpreted as meaning that unit-holders in a pension fund such as the one at issue in the main proceedings can be regarded as bearing investment risk, and does this mean that the pension fund constitutes a ‘special investment fund’ within the meaning of that provision? Is it relevant in that regard:

| — | whether unit-holders bear an individual investment risk or is it sufficient that unit-holders as a collective — and no one else — bear the consequences of the investment results? |
| --- | --- |

—

whether unit-holders bear an individual investment risk or is it sufficient that unit-holders as a collective — and no one else — bear the consequences of the investment results?

| — | what the magnitude of the collective or individual risk is? |
| --- | --- |

—

what the magnitude of the collective or individual risk is?

| — | to what extent the amount of the pension benefit depends also on other factors, such as the number of years of pension accrual, salary level and the actuarial interest rate? |
| --- | --- |

—

to what extent the amount of the pension benefit depends also on other factors, such as the number of years of pension accrual, salary level and the actuarial interest rate?

---

(1)  Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1).

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                              84
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      330
<ALLOWANCES>                                        24
<INVENTORY>                                        256
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1133
<PP&E>                                            1913
<DEPRECIATION>                                     748
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    2697
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              946
<BONDS>                                            888
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        100
<COMMON>                                           840
<OTHER-SE>                                       (692)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      2697
<SALES>                                           5016
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  5016
<CGS>                                             2565
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     2565
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     4
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  86
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1064)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (133)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (931)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (931)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (6.80)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (6.80)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8510 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8510

To modify the Federal share for Federal-aid highway projects for fiscal 
              years 2021 and 2022, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 2, 2020

 Mr. Rodney Davis of Illinois introduced the following bill; which was 
     referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To modify the Federal share for Federal-aid highway projects for fiscal 
              years 2021 and 2022, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Highway Relief Act''.

SEC. 2. TEMPORARY FEDERAL SHARE FOR FEDERAL-AID HIGHWAY PROJECTS.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Federal share of 
the cost of a project under title 23, United States Code, for which 
amounts are made available during fiscal year 2021 and 2022 may be up 
to 100 percent, at the discretion of the Secretary of Transportation.
                                 <all>
```
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 15, 2016

No. 04-16-00124-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.J.P.,

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-PA-00878

Honorable Karen Crouch, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellee has filed a brief in which she argues that Appellant’s brief violates Texas Rule 

of Appellate Procedure 9.8 by identifying M.J.P., a minor, by name. Appellant’s brief does 

identify M.J.P. by name. Further, Appellant’s appendix contains a copy of the trial court’s order, 

which also identifies the minor by name. Thus, because Appellant’s brief violates Rule 9.8, we 

STRIKE Appellant’s brief. We ORDER Appellant to file on or before July 25, 2016 an amended 

brief (including an appendix) that complies with Rule 9.8. Appellant’s amended brief may only 

be modified to comply with Rule 9.8. If Appellant does not file an amended brief complying 

with Rule 9.8 in the time provided, this appeal will be dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).

After Appellant’s amended brief is filed, Appellee may file any response within ten days of the 

filing of Appellant’s amended brief. 

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 15th day of July, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
# C_2022398EN.01001103.xml

| 17.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 398/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 398/11

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Hannover (Germany) lodged on 12 July 2022 — MK v WB

(Case C-461/22)

(2022/C 398/14)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landgericht Hannover

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: MK

Respondent: WB

Questions referred

Is a legally appointed curator who performs that activity in a professional capacity a controller within the meaning of Article 4(7) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation — ‘the GDPR’)?

Is he or she required to provide information in accordance with Article 15 of the GDPR?

---

(1)  OJ 2016 L 119, p. 1.

---
| (logo)  WELLS FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon Street  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

Referenceis hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as ofMarch 1, 2015, by and among WELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES,INC., asDepositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, RIALTOCAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC, as Special Servicer, TRIMONT REAL ESTATE ADVISORS, INC,as Trust Advisor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as CertificateAdministrator, as Tax Administrator and as Custodian and WILMINGTON TRUST,NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates Series 2015-C27 (the "Agreement").Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meaningsassigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuantto Section 11.12 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice Presidentof Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.            A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period fromJanuary 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and

 

2.           To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, hasfulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28thday of February 2018.

 

 

/s/DanielBober

DanielBober

ExecutiveVice President

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells  Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo)  Together we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 45 (Friday, March 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 10589]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5650]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

All Items Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers; United 
States City Average

    Pursuant to Section 112 of the 1976 amendments to the Federal 
Election Campaign Act (Pub. L. 94-283, 2 U.S.C. 441a), the Secretary of 
Labor has certified to the Chairman of the Federal Election Commission 
and publishes this notice in the Federal Register that the United 
States City Average All Items Consumer Price Index for All Urban 
Consumers (1967=100) increased 218.1 percent from its 1974 annual 
average of 147.7 to its 1996 annual average of 469.9. Using 1974 as a 
base (1974=100), I certify that the United States City Average All 
Items Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers thus increased 218.1 
percent from its 1974 annual average of 100 to its 1996 annual average 
of 318.1.

    Signed at Washington, D.C., on the 19th day of February 1997.
Cynthia A. Metzler,
Acting Secretary of Labor.
[FR Doc. 97-5650 Filed 3-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-24-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000818257
<NAME> JOHN HANCOCK REALTY INCOME FUND-II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       5,196,805
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,001,743
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,294,703
<PP&E>                                      24,396,994
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,995,238
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              39,395,927
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          583,659
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  38,812,268
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                39,395,927
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,122,644
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  543,425
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               686,209
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,893,010
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,893,010
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,893,010
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.72
        

</TABLE>
# C_2022359EN.01007401.xml

| 19.9.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 359/74 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.9.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 359/74

---

Order of the General Court of 20 July 2022 — Sanoptis v EUIPO — Synoptis Pharma (SANOPTIS)

(Case T-30/22) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the application for registration - No need to adjudicate)

(2022/C 359/92)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Sanoptis Sàrl (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: S. Rost, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Synoptis Pharma sp. z o.o. (Warsaw, Poland)

Re:

By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant, Sanoptis Sàrl, seeks annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 18 November 2021 (Case R 850/2021-4).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | Sanoptis Sàrl shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Sanoptis Sàrl shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 119, 14.3.2022.

---
268 P.2d 744]

[L. A. No. 22880.

In Bank.

Apr. 2, 1954.]

#### THE PEOPLE, Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA CENTRAL AIRLINES (a Corporation), Respondent.

Everett C. McKeage and J. Thomason Phelps for Appellant.

John W. Preston, Jr., for Respondent.

THE COURT.

This appeal is from a judgment of dismissal after a demurrer to the complaint had been sustained without leave to amend. The complaint presents the same issues as those involved in the case of *People*v. *Western Air Lines, Inc.,*a corporation, L. A. No. 22881, *ante,*p. 621 [268 P.2d 723], this day decided. Any difference in factual background in that this company is not federally certificated, that it operates entirely intrastate, and that it did not petition for review of the commission’s decision and order of April 24, 1951, does not affect the result.

The judgment is reversed.

SCHAUER, J.

For the reasons and upon the grounds stated in my dissenting opinion in *People*v. *Western Air Lines, Inc.,*L. A. No. 22881, this day filed *(ante,*p. 621 [268 P.2d 723]), I would affirm the judgment.

Edmonds, J., concurred.
No. 11-10577.

#### Inman *v.*Clark, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.