alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Eric Leon AGER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-12081 Non-Argument Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

(March 14, 2018)

Holly Lynn Gershow, U.S. Attorney Service—Middle District of Florida, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Before JORDAN, MARTIN and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Jose Rodriguez, appointed counsel for Eric Ager in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 *994U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Ager’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2003 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

2-25-2003

USA v. Lee

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential

Docket 01-4485

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2003

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2003 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"USA v. Lee" (2003). 2003 Decisions. Paper 768.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2003/768
PRECEDENTIAL 

 Filed February 25, 2003 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT 

No. 01-4485/4496 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

v. 

ALBERT M. LEE, 

 Appellant 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the District of Delaware 

(D.C. Criminal Action No. 00-cr-00024-1 & 

No. 00-cr-00028-1) 

District Judge: Honorable Gregory M. Sleet 

Argued on October 17, 2002 

Before: ROTH and GREENBERG, Circuit Judges 

WARD,* District Judge 

ORDER AMENDING SLIP OPINION 

WARD, District Judge: 

IT IS ORDERED that the published Opinion in the above 

case, filed January 7, 2003, be amended as follows: 

On page 1, line 18 should read: 

_________________________________________________________________ 

* The Honorable Robert J. Ward, United States District Judge for the 

Southern District of New York, sitting by designation. 

 

 "Before: ROTH and GREENBERG, Circuit Judges 

 WARD*, District Judge" 

 By the Court, 

 /s/ Robert J. Ward 

 District Judge 

Date: February 25, 2003 

A True Copy: 

Teste: 

 Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals 

 for the Third Circuit 
 2
#### WILLIAMS, P. v. UCBR

197 CD 2017

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

10/02/2017

Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, B-594463

Affirmed
# C_2023127EN.01003902.xml

| 11.4.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 127/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.4.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 127/39

---

Order of the General Court of 9 February 2023 — Aziz v Commission

(Case T-286/22) (1)

(Action for annulment - Protection of personal data - Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 - Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure - Failure to comply with procedural requirements - Inadmissibility)

(2023/C 127/50)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Ahmad Aziz (Pietà, Malta) (represented by: L. Cuschieri, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Bouchagiar and H. Kranenborg, acting as Agents)

Re:

By his action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks, in essence, annulment of the European Commission’s implied decision of 16 May 2022 not to provide him with his personal data within the prescribed period.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | Mr Ahmad Aziz shall bear his own costs and pay those of the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Ahmad Aziz shall bear his own costs and pay those of the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 359, 19.9.2022.

---
!function(e){var t={};function r(n){if(t[n])return t[n].exports;var o=t[n]={i:n,l:!1,exports:{}};return e[n].call(o.exports,o,o.exports,r),o.l=!0,o.exports}r.m=e,r.c=t,r.d=function(e,t,n){r.o(e,t)||Object.defineProperty(e,t,{enumerable:!0,get:n})},r.r=function(e){"undefined"!=typeof Symbol&&Symbol.toStringTag&&Object.defineProperty(e,Symbol.toStringTag,{value:"Module"}),Object.defineProperty(e,"__esModule",{value:!0})},r.t=function(e,t){if(1&t&&(e=r(e)),8&t)return e;if(4&t&&"object"==typeof e&&e&&e.__esModule)return e;var n=Object.create(null);if(r.r(n),Object.defineProperty(n,"default",{enumerable:!0,value:e}),2&t&&"string"!=typeof e)for(var o in e)r.d(n,o,function(t){return e[t]}.bind(null,o));return n},r.n=function(e){var t=e&&e.__esModule?function(){return e.default}:function(){return e};return r.d(t,"a",t),t},r.o=function(e,t){return Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(e,t)},r.p="",r(r.s=182)}({14:function(e,t){e.exports=Drupal},182:function(e,t,r){"use strict";r.r(t);var n=r(14);!function(e){e.behaviors.mobilesecondary={attach:function(e){function t(){var t=e.querySelector(".js-mobile-secondary"),r=e.querySelector(".usa-header .usa-nav__secondary"),n=window.matchMedia("(min-width: 640px)"),o=e.querySelector(".js-secondary-utility-links");n.matches?r.prepend(o):t.prepend(o)}var r=!1;window.addEventListener("resize",(function(){!1!==r&&clearTimeout(r),r=setTimeout(t,0)})),t()}}}(r.n(n).a)}});
Exhibit 31.2  I, Dempsey Mork, certify that:  1.           I have reviewed this quarterly report for the period ended Sept. 30, 2008 on Form 10-Q of Knickerbocker Capital Corp.;  2.           Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.           Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.           The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a)           Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b)           Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c)           Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.           The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)           All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b)           Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  Nov. 19, 2009   /s/ Dempsey Mork Dempsey Mork Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         911,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,905,000
<PP&E>                                      79,176,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              25,276,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              66,371,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,142,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (6,679,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                66,371,000
<SALES>                                      8,825,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,005,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,875,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,513,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,233,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,233,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                216,000
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,017,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.99)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.99)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 911 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 911

 To require the installation of secondary cockpit barriers on existing 
                   aircraft, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 30, 2019

 Mr. Fitzpatrick (for himself, Mr. Gottheimer, Mr. Carson of Indiana, 
 Mr. King of New York, Mr. Bergman, Mr. Cook, Mr. Lipinski, Mr. Posey, 
   Mr. Brendan F. Boyle of Pennsylvania, Mr. Bacon, and Mr. Nadler) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                   Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the installation of secondary cockpit barriers on existing 
                   aircraft, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Saracini Enhanced Aviation Safety 
Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. INSTALLATION OF SECONDARY COCKPIT BARRIERS ON EXISTING 
              AIRCRAFT.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 18 months after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the Federal Aviation 
Administration shall issue an order requiring installation of a 
secondary cockpit barrier on each covered aircraft.
    (b) Covered Aircraft.--In this section, the term ``covered 
aircraft'' means a commercial aircraft operating under the provisions 
of part 121 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2022326EN.01002901.xml

| 29.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/29

---

Action brought on 14 July 2022 — Rada Perfumery v EUIPO — Prada (RADA PERFUMES)

(Case T-439/22)

(2022/C 326/40)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Rada Perfumery SRL (Cluj-Napoca, Romania) (represented by: E.-M. Dicu, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Prada SA (Luxembourg, Luxembourg)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark RADA PERFUMES — Application for registration No 18 186 386

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 April 2022 in Case R 1610/2021-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision and, as a consequence, reject the opposition and, consequently, admit the registration of the European Union trade mark No 18 186 386. |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision and, as a consequence, reject the opposition and, consequently, admit the registration of the European Union trade mark No 18 186 386.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(a) and (b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(a) and (b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.10
                        [LETTERHEAD OF LOCKHEED MARTIN]


MEMORANDUM

TO:       G. R. Long

FROM:     P. B. Teets

DATE:     November 8, 1995

SUBJECT:  Senior Executive Retirement Plan
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This memorandum is to confirm our mutual agreement regarding the extension of
your employment to January 31, 1997 under the Sanders Supplemental Executive
Retirement Plan (SERP) provisions.  This agreement will cancel your notice of
retirement as detailed in your November 1, 1995 letter.

Your employment will continue to January 31, 1997 and you will remain eligible
for the SERP benefits as follows:

 .       One year of salary continuation plus the average of the three prior
        years' incentive compensation.  During this salary continuation period,
        all benefits and perquisites shall continue.

 .       Consulting arrangement (at 35% of base annual salary at retirement) for
        a one year period following salary continuation.

 .       One time relocation benefit within one year of retirement.

At the end of the salary continuation period, the following retiree benefits
will continue:

 .       CalComp Retiree Medical Plan (if currently enrolled);

 .       CalComp Retiree Life Coverage of $3,000;

 .       Continuation of CalComp Dental Coverage for up to 18 months if elected
        and premiums paid.

All other provisions of the Plan will remain the same.  Please sign below if you
are in agreement.

    /s/ Peter B. Teets                                  /s/ Gary R. Long
    ---------------------                               ------------------
    Peter B. Teets                                      Gary R. Long
    President, Information &                            President
    Technology Services Sector                          CalComp
<PAGE>
 
[LOGO OF CALCOMP]

A Lockheed Martin Company
2411 West La Palma Avenue
Anaheim, CA 92801

                           **FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION**
                           --------------------------

                                  CONFIDENTIAL

TO:       GARY MANN                                     DATE:   July 1, 1996
                                                NO. OF PAGES:   1

FROM:     GARY LONG                                FAX REPLY:   (714) 821-2074
                                                 PHONE REPLY:   (714) 821-2172

SUBJECT:  RETIREMENT TO NOTIFICATION


The Sanders Early Retirement Program (SERP) requires a participant under the
plan to notify management of his intention to retire six months prior to the
planned retirement date.  In order to meet that requirement, I am notifying you
of my intention to retire on January 31, 1997.

This is consistent with our discussion and the proxy.  I acknowledge the
"handshake" agreement I have with you and Pete Teets concerning continuing
through calendar 1997, and it is my intention to meet this commitment.  This
notification is to ensure that I meet the requirements of the SERP.

bjg
copy: Kevin Coleman
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 16.1

                    (Letterhead of Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.)



September 12, 1997



Securities and Exchange Commission
450 5th Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549

Gentlemen:

We have read the statements made by NorAm Energy Corp. (copy attached), which we
understand will be filed with the Commission, pursuant to Item 4 of Form 8-K, as
part of the Company's Form 8-K/A report to be filed on September 12, 1997.  We
agree with the statements concerning our Firm in such Form 8-K/A.

Very truly yours,



Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          18,261
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   72,302
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (10,524)
<INVENTORY>                                     66,467
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               162,722
<PP&E>                                          23,984
<DEPRECIATION>                                (22,107)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 200,510
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          370,185
<BONDS>                                          4,286
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,338
<OTHER-SE>                                   (298,908)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   200,510
<SALES>                                         81,549
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               158,985
<CGS>                                           62,198
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  128,672
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                39,826
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,498
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,653
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (14,982)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (14,982)<F1>
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (14,982)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.60)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.60)
<FN>
<F1>ON OCTOBER 15, THE COMPANY ANNOUNCED THAT THE U.S. OPERATION FILE FOR
PROTECTION UNDER CHAPTER 11 OF THE U.S. BANKRUPTCY CODE WITH THE INTENT TO SELL
THE U.S. OPERATIONS.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
No. 11-10514.

#### Gorbatova *v.*Greater Lynn Senior Services, Inc., aka GLSS, Inc.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1474

LEONARD A. BOYLES, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (1:05-cv-00022) Submitted: October 31, 2006 Decided: November 22, 2006 Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Leonard A. Boyles, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Paul Bradford Taylor, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Leonard A. Boyles, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders and judgment granting in part and denying in part Boyles’s motion for summary judgment, affirming the Administrative Law Judge’s final decision with respect to Boyles’s date of continuous disability and denying Boyles’s motion to modify the judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Boyles v. Commissioner , No. 1:05-cv-00022 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 1, 2006; Feb 16, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 95 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 95

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 16, 2019

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To amend title 38, United States Code, to ensure that children of 
  homeless veterans are included in the calculation of the amounts of 
                        certain per diem grants.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Homeless Veteran Families Act''.

SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF CALCULATION OF AMOUNTS OF PER DIEM GRANTS.

    Section 2012(a)(2)(B) of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in clause (i), by inserting ``or (iii)'' after ``clause 
        (ii)''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new clause:
            ``(iii) With respect to a homeless veteran who has care of 
        a minor dependent while receiving services from the grant 
        recipient or eligible entity, the daily cost of care shall be 
        the sum of the daily cost of care determined under subparagraph 
        (A) plus, for each such minor dependent, an amount that equals 
        50 percent of such daily cost of care.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 15, 2019.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```