alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 2000 AND FROM THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FROM THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         126,940
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  6,182
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0<F1>
<PP&E>                                         1,449,677
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0<F2>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,753,375
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0<F1>
<BONDS>                                        2,126,306
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (609,938)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,753,375
<SALES>                                        134,871
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               137,041
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  105,644
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             45,041
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (13,644)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (13,644)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (13,644)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>THE PARTNERSHIP HAS AN UNCLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET; THEREFORE, THE VALUE IS
$0.
<F2>THIS INFORMATION IS NOT DISCLOSED IN THE PARTNERSHIP'S FORM 10-Q
FILING.
</FN>


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1



                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
reports incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K, into the Company's
previously filed Registration Statement on Form S-8 dated September 9, 1993 and
September 13, 1993, and Form S-3 dated February 13, 1995.

ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP



The Woodlands, Texas
March 26, 1997
Submitted September 2,

reversed December 7, 2016

#### In the Matter of L. M. H., a Person Alleged to have a Mental Illness. STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*L. M. H., *Appellant.*

Multnomah County Circuit Court

16CC01527; A161802

389 P3d 1175

Joseph DeBin and Multnomah Defenders, Inc., filed the brief for appellant.

Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Dustin Buehler, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Armstrong, Presiding Judge, and Tookey, Judge, and Shorr, Judge.

*724PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of an order committing him to the Oregon Health Authority for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. In an unpreserved assignment of error, appellant contends that the order should be reversed because the trial court plainly erred when it failed to inform him of his rights listed in ORS 426.100(1). The state concedes the error, and we accept the state’s concession. The court’s failure to advise appellant of his rights under ORS 426.100(1) constitutes plain error. *See, e.g., State v. M. L. R.,*256 Or App 566, 570-71, 303 P3d 954 (2013) (“[The] failure to provide a person with all of the information required by ORS 426.100(1) constitutes an egregious error that justifies plain error review.”). Further, for the reasons stated in *M. L. R.—viz.,*the nature of civil commitment proceedings, the gravity of the violation, the ends of justice, and the lack of harmless error—we conclude that it is appropriate to exercise our discretion to correct the error in this case.

Reversed.
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302(A) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



I, Charley Changmin Yoon, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust 2015-A
(the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);



2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken
as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and
other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act
periodic reports;



4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required
in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has
fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and



5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act
Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material
instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.



In giving the certifications above, I have
reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Citibank, N.A.



Date: March 15, 2018



| | By: | /s/ Charley Changmin Yoon                                    
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------
| |     | Name: Charley Changmin Yoon                                  
| |     | Title:  President and Secretary                              
| |     | (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit 32.1

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350*

In connection with the Annual Report of PGI Incorporated (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Laurence A. Schiffer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbones-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
     the Company.

/s/ Laurence A. Schiffer
------------------------
    Laurence A. Schiffer
    Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)     March 31, 2006


<FN>
* A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the
  Company and will be retained by the Company and will be furnished to the
  Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 11

Permitting the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony as part

of the commemoration of the days of remembrance of victims of the

Holocaust.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 21, 1997

Mr. YATES submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on House Oversight

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Permitting the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony as part of the commemoration of the days of

remembrance of victims of the Holocaust.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the rotunda of the Capitol is authorized

3 to be used from 8 o’clock ante meridiem until 3 o’clock

4 post meridiem on May 8, 1997, for a ceremony as part

5 of the commemoration of the days of remembrance of vic6 tims of the Holocaust. Physical preparations for the cere7 mony shall be carried out in accordance with such condi8 tions as the Architect of the Capitol may prescribe.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 46 (Monday, March 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 10852]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5888]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-5700-7]


National Advisory Council for Environmental Policy and Technology 
Information Impacts Committee; Public Meeting

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the Federal Advisory Committee Act, PL 92463, EPA gives 
notice of a two-day meeting, of the National Advisory Council for 
Environmental Policy and Technology (NACEPT) Information Impacts 
Committee (IIC). NACEPT provides advice and recommendations to the 
Administrator of EPA on a broad range of environmental policy issues. 
The IIC has been asked to review information requirements, and provide 
recommendations on how to effectively position information resources to 
support new, comprehensive and long-term Agency initiatives. This 
meeting is being held to commence development of the committee's 
recommendations to the Agency.

DATES: The two-day public meeting will be held on Tuesday, April 15, 
1997 from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. and Wednesday, April 16, 1997 from 
9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. The meeting will be held at the Channel Inn 
Hotel 650 Water Street, SW., Washington, DC 20024.

ADDRESSES: Although time will be limited, there will be opportunity for 
public comment. Interested parties may submit written materials or 
comments, or may choose to address the committee directly. In either 
case, requests for participation must be submitted no later than March 
31, 1997 to Joe Sierra, Designated Federal Officer, NACEPT/IIC, U.S. 
EPA, Office of the Cooperative Environmental Management (1601F), 401 M 
Street, S.W., Washington, DC 20460.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joseph Sierra, Designated Federal Officer for the Information Impacts 
Committee at 202-260-5839.

    Dated: February 25, 1997.
Joseph A. Sierra,
Designated Federal Official.
[FR Doc. 97-5888 Filed 3-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-M
U. S. ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION 

VOTING SYSTEM TESTING AND CERTIFICATION PROGRAM

1225 New York Avenue, NW, Suite 1100 

Washington, DC. 20005 

July 2, 2010 

Carolyn Coggins 

iBeta Quality Assurance 

3131 S Vaughn Way, Suite 650 

Aurora, CO 80014 

RE: Approval of ES&S Unity 3.2.0.0 Rev. 1 Test Plan 

Dear Ms. Coggins, 

This letter is to inform you that version 2.0 of the test plan submitted by iBeta Quality Assurance 

for the testing of ES&S Unity 3.2.0.0 Rev. 1 voting system has been reviewed and approved. Per 

section 4.4.4.3 of the EAC’s Testing and Certification Program Manual (“Program Manual”) a 

test plan is approved based on the information submitted. Test plan approval indicates the 

following: 

• Approval simply signifies that the tests proposed, if performed properly, appear to be 

sufficient to fully test the system. A final determination of the sufficiency of the testing is 

a global evaluation based on the test plan, test cases, and test report reviews, as well as 

the EAC’s Quality Monitoring Process outlined in ch. 8 of the Program Manual. 

• Approval allows the test laboratory to begin test case development, testing, and test 

report submittal. 

• A test plan is approved based on information submitted. It is not known if relevant 

information was omitted that would affect the testing campaign. 

• The test plan is a living document and is expected to change and be updated during 

various phases of the testing life cycle. A final version that reflects all of the testing 

completed (TDP, S/W, Hardware, Software etc) should be submitted to the EAC at the 

completion of testing. If this final “as run” test plan does not reflect all the testing 

required, the EAC reserves the right to request further updates to the test plan and 

possibly additional testing. 

I also want to take this opportunity to remind you of the EAC’s requirements following approval 

of a test plan. Section 4.5 of the Program Manual requires VSTLs to report any changes to a 

voting system or an approved test plan directly to the EAC. Under this section, Manufacturers are 

required to enable VSTLs to report all test failures or anomalies directly to the EAC. In addition, 

for further guidance on this matter, please refer to Section 4.5.1 for information regarding the 

reporting requirements for changes to a system or test plan during testing, and Section 4.5.2 for 

information regarding the reporting requirements for anomalies or failures found during testing. 
Section 4.6 of the Program Manual lays out the various requirements for the submission and 

approval of a test report. 

If you should have any questions regarding the approval of the test plan referenced above, or the 

rest of the EAC’s certification process please contact me. 

Brian J. Hancock 

Director, Testing and Certification 

cc: Election Systems and Software
#### WILLIAMS, S. v. PHILA. HOUSING AUTH.

958 CD 2016

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

10/24/2017

Philadelphia County Civil Division, 160400574

Affirmed
# Rural Postsecondary &amp; Economic Development (RPED) Program

- Biden-Harris Administration Awards $44.5 Million to Improve Postsecondary Education Access and Completion for Students in Rural Communities The Biden-Harris Administration today announced $44.5 million in grants to 22 institutions of higher education to improve rates of postsecondary education enrollment, persistence, and completion among students in rural communities.
No. 11-10064.

#### Bookman *v.*United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
# C_2022002EN.01004802.xml

| 3.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 2/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 2/48

---

Action brought on 2 November 2021 — Allessa v EUIPO — Dumerth (CASSELLAPARK)

(Case T-701/21)

(2022/C 2/67)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Allessa GmbH (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: S. Fröhlich, M. Hartmann and H. Lerchl, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Carim Dumerth (Frankfurt am Main)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark CASSELLAPARK — EU word mark No 16 917 429

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 August 2021 in Case R 1043/2020-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings and the costs incurred by the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings and the costs incurred by the applicant.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of the right to be heard consisting in an adequate statement of reasons; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of the right to be heard consisting in an adequate statement of reasons;

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 59(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 59(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ALL AMERICAN SEMICONDUCTOR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES                                          Exhibit 11.1

STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS (UNAUDITED)

                                                            Quarters                    Nine Months
PERIODS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30                            2003           2002           2003           2002
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<S>                                           <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE:
-------------------------

Net Income ................................   $    177,000   $  1,559,000   $    301,000   $  1,876,000
                                              ============   ============   ============   ============

Weighted Average Shares Outstanding .......      3,785,175      3,851,185      3,804,462      3,854,998
                                              ============   ============   ============   ============

Basic Earnings Per Share ..................         $  .05         $  .40         $  .08         $  .49
                                                    ======         ======         ======         ======

DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE:
---------------------------

Net Income ................................   $    177,000   $  1,559,000   $    301,000   $  1,876,000
                                              ============   ============   ============   ============

Weighted Average and Dilutive Shares:
  Weighted average shares outstanding .....      3,785,175      3,851,185      3,804,462      3,854,998
  Dilutive shares .........................        154,271            160         56,149            127
                                              ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------
                                                 3,939,446      3,851,345      3,860,611      3,855,125
                                              ============   ============   ============   ============

Diluted Earnings Per Share ................         $  .04         $  .40         $  .08         $  .49
                                                    ======         ======         ======         ======
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                            WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549


                                   FORM 8-K

                                CURRENT REPORT

                      Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
                      The Securities Exchange Act of 1934

      Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): December 11, 1996

                        NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING INC.
            (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

        Delaware                         1-12385               74-1541566
(State or other jurisdiction           (Commission            (IRS Employer
   of Incorporation)                   File Number)         Identification No.)

4101 Washington Avenue, Newport News, VA                       23607-2770
(Address of principal executive offices)                       (Zip Code)

                                (757) 380-2000
             (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)



<PAGE>
 
ITEM 5. OTHER EVENTS.

       (i) On December 11, 1996, Tenneco Inc., the then sole stockholder of 
Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. (the "Company"), distributed (the "Shipbuilding 
Distribution") all of the outstanding shares of the common stock, par value 
$0.01 per share, of the Company (the "Common Stock") to the stockholders of 
record of the common stock of Tenneco Inc., pursuant to a certain Distribution 
Agreement, dated as of November 1, 1996, among Tenneco Inc., New Tenneco Inc. 
and the Company, set forth as Exhibit 2 to the Company's Registration Statement 
on Form 10, dated November 6, 1996, as amended, filed with the Securities and 
Exchange Commission (File No. 1-12385) (the "Registration Statement"). No 
consideration was paid by the stockholders of Tenneco Inc. for the Common Stock 
received in connection with the Shipbuilding Distribution. The Shipbuilding 
Distribution and related transactions are more fully described in the 
Registration Statement.

       (ii) The Company, along with two other companies, previously entered into
an alliance (the "Alliance") to bid on the U.S. Navy's LPD-17 non-nuclear
amphibious assault ship construction program (the "LPD-17 Program"). On December
17, 1996, the Navy announced that another group of companies, competing with the
Alliance for award of the contract for the LPD-17 Program, was the successful
bidder.



<PAGE>
 

                                  SIGNATURES

       Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the 
Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the 
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

                                             NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING INC.



December 20, 1996                            /s/ STEPHEN B. CLARKSON
                                             --------------------------
                                             By: Stephen B. Clarkson
                                             Vice President, General Counsel
                                             and Secretary
# C_2023164EN.01002501.xml

| 8.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 164/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 164/25

---

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 23 January 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Apelativen sad — Sofia — Bulgaria) — HO v ‘EUROBANK BULGARIA’ AD

(Case C-350/22, (1) Eurobank Bulgaria)

(Removal from the register)

(2023/C 164/30)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Apelativen sad — Sofia

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: HO

Defendant:‘EUROBANK BULGARIA’ AD

The case was removed from the Register of the Court of Justice by order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 23 January 2023.

---

(1)  Date lodged: 31.5.2022.

---