alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-11-00110-CV

Jon Alan Ashcraft, Appellant

v.

Estate of Jay Arden Ashcraft and Richard Trachtenberg, Administrator, Appellees

FROM THE PROBATE COURT NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. C-1-PB-10-000318, HONORABLE GUY S. HERMAN, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

On February 14, 2011, Appellant Jon Alan Ashcraft, appearing pro se, filed a notice

of appeal from the probate court’s declaratory judgment, which was signed on October 6, 2010. On

June 8, 2011, pursuant to rule of appellate procedure 42.3, this Court notified Ashcraft that the

notice of appeal appeared to be untimely and that his appeal would be dismissed unless he

provided information on or before June 20, 2011, to show the jurisdiction of this Court. See Tex.

R. App. P. 42.3. In response to our letter, Ashcraft informed us that he is incarcerated, the

probate court denied his motion for issuance of bench warrant and his motion to participate in the

hearing by teleconference, and he did not receive notice of the signing of the judgment until

November 15, 2010, more than twenty days after the judgment was signed. Ashcraft further

informed us, and the clerk’s record confirms, that on November 30, 2010, he filed a motion pursuant
to rule of civil procedure 306a to establish the operative date of the judgment, which he re-urged on

January 4, 2011, and January 23, 2011. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 306a(5).

Rule 306a of the rules of civil procedure provides that if within twenty days after a

judgment is signed, a party adversely affected by it has neither received the required notice nor

acquired actual knowledge of the judgment, then appellate deadlines shall begin to run from the date

that such party received notice or acquired actual knowledge of the rendition of judgment. Tex. R.

Civ. P. 306a(4); see also Tex. R. App. P. 4.2(a). In order to establish the application of the rule, the

adversely affected party must prove in the trial court on sworn motion and notice the date on which

the party first received notice of the judgment or acquired actual knowledge of it and that this date

was more than twenty days after it was signed. Tex. R. Civ. P. 306a(5); Tex. R. App. P. 4.2(b). 

After hearing the motion, the trial court must sign a written order that finds the date when the party

first received notice or acquired actual knowledge of the signing of the judgment. Tex. R. App. P.

4.2(c).

The probate court did not rule on Ashcraft’s motion. See Tex. R. App. P. 4.2(c). 

Accordingly, we abate this appeal and remand the cause to the probate court to conduct the requisite

hearing and to sign an order ruling on Ashcraft’s motion. See id. Afterthe hearing, the probate court

shall cause a supplemental clerk’s record with a copy of the order to be filed with this Court. The

supplemental clerk’s record shall be filed no later than 45 days following the date of this opinion.

2
__________________________________________

Melissa Goodwin, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Henson and Goodwin

Abated

Filed: July 6, 2011

3
No. 11-10859.

#### Delgado-Benitez *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.7
 
                              AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO 
                  EMPLOYMENT AND STOCK COMPENSATION AGREEMENT


     This Amendment No. 1 to Employment and Stock Compensation Agreement (the
"Amendment"), effective as of May 21, 1997, is entered into by and among Friede
Goldman International Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), HAM Marine,
Inc., a Mississippi corporation ("HAM Marine"), and John F. Alford ("Alford").

     WHEREAS, the Company, HAM Marine and Alford entered into an Employment and
Stock Compensation Agreement dated May 21, 1997, (the "Agreement"); and

     WHEREAS, the Company, HAM Marine and Alford desire to amend certain
provisions of the Agreement.

     Therefore, in consideration of the mutual promises, terms, covenants and
conditions set forth herein and in the Agreement, and the performance of each,
it is hereby agreed as follows:

     1.   Section 3.5 Piggyback Registration Rights of the Agreement is hereby
deleted in its entirety.

     2.   Defined terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the
meanings set forth in the Agreement.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this Amendment have caused this
Amendment to be executed as of the day and year first written above.

                                 FRIEDE GOLDMAN INTERNATIONAL INC.



                                 By:___________________________________
                                    Name:
                                    Title:

                                 HAM MARINE, INC.



                                 By:___________________________________
                                 Name:
<PAGE>
 
                                 Title:

                                 EMPLOYEE:



                                 ______________________________________
                                 John F. Alford
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                     APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                       JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                             44569
<SECURITIES>                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                      1189200
<ALLOWANCES>                       76469
<INVENTORY>                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   1215633
<PP&E>                             123923
<DEPRECIATION>                     45699
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     1663007
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              150806
<BONDS>                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0
<PREFERRED>                        0
<COMMON>                           375262
<OTHER-SE>                         (481946)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       1663007
<SALES>                            1432239
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   1432239
<CGS>                              792853
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      792853
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   561910
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 4454
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    72522
<INCOME-TAX>                       3000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                69522
<DISCONTINUED>                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0
<CHANGES>                          0
<NET-INCOME>                       69522
<EPS-BASIC>                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                      0



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000818674
<NAME>                        INTELLICALL, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000 
<CURRENCY>                    US Dollars            
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1997          
<PERIOD-START>                 JUL-01-1997    
<PERIOD-END>                   SEP-30-1997     
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                     1     
<CASH>                            259              
<SECURITIES>                        0             
<RECEIVABLES>                  30,686               
<ALLOWANCES>                   (4,519)           
<INVENTORY>                     3,345        
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                1,307          
<PP&E>                         17,003         
<DEPRECIATION>                 (9,469)          
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 63,580        
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          18,830         
<BONDS>                             0          
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>          11,196         
<PREFERRED>                         1         
<COMMON>                           95         
<OTHER-SE>                      8,135         
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   63,580          
<SALES>                         5,770          
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               30,761         
<CGS>                          10,410          
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  33,160         
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                3,829          
<LOSS-PROVISION>                  273          
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               (619)         
<INCOME-PRETAX>                (6,987)        
<INCOME-TAX>                     (142)         
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            (7,129)        
<DISCONTINUED>                      0         
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0          
<CHANGES>                           0         
<NET-INCOME>                   (7,184)         
<EPS-PRIMARY>                    (.77)       
<EPS-DILUTED>                       0     
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby  consent  to  the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statements on Form S-8  (Nos. 333-02033, 2-96616,  33-677, 2-77778, 2-83297,  2-
81753, 33-17875, 33-19911, 33-25396, 33-25674) and  on Form S-3 (Nos.  333-2069,
33-45213, 33-59663) of Ralston Purina Company  and the Prospectuses thereto,  of
our report dated November  1, 1996 appearing  on page 27  of the Ralston  Purina
Company 1996 Annual Report to Shareholders which is incorporated by reference in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K.




PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP

St. Louis, Missouri
December 13, 1996
#### IN RE: M.E.M., Appeal of: S.M.M., mother

532 WDA 2017

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/29/2017

O.A. No. 51 of 2016

(Butler)

Affirmed
<Page>


                                                                     EXHIBIT 32d

        Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18
                            of the United States Code

     I, Robert E. Busch, Chief Financial Officer of Public Service Electric and
Gas Company, to the best of my knowledge, certify that (i) the Annual Report of
Public Service Electric and Gas Company on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of Public Service Electric and Gas Company.

                                         /s/ Robert E. Busch
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Robert E. Busch
                                         Public Service Electric and Gas Company
                                         Chief Financial Officer
                                         February 28, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 49 (Thursday, March 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 11849]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6247]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Meeting of the DOD Advisory Group on Electron Devices

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Advisory Group on Electron Devices.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Working Group A (Microwave Devices) of the DoD Advisory Group 
on Electron Devices (AGED) announces a closed session meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held at 0900, Tuesday, 8 April 1997.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at Palisades Institute for Research 
Services, 1745 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 500, Arlington, VA 22202.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joy Baumgarten, AGED Secretariat, 1745 
Jefferson Davis Highway, Crystal Square Four, Suite 500, Arlington, 
Virginia 22202.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The mission of the Advisory Group is to 
provide advice to the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and 
Technology, to the Director of Defense Research and Engineering 
(DDR&E), and through the DDR&E to the Director, Defense Advanced 
Research Projects Agency (ARPA) and the Military Departments in 
planning and managing an effective and economical research and 
development program in the area of electron devices.
    The Working Group A meeting will be limited to review of research 
and development programs which the Military Departments propose to 
initiate with industry, universities or in their laboratories. This 
microwave device area includes programs on developments and research 
related to microwave tubes, solid state microwave devices, electronic 
warfare devices, millimeter wave devices, and passive devices. The 
review will include details of classified defense programs throughout.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of Pub. L. No. 92-463, as amended, 
(5 U.S.C. App. Sec. 10(d) (1994)), it has been determined that this 
Advisory Group meeting concerns matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 
Sec. 552b(c)(1) (1994), and that accordingly, this meeting will be 
closed to the public.

    Dated: March 7, 1997.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 97-6247 Filed 3-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
No. 11-10857.

#### Ramos-Hernandez *v.*United States.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-10729.

#### Osborne *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
U.S. ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

AGENCY: U.S. Election Assistance Commission.

ACTION: Sunshine Act Notice; Notice of Public Meeting Agenda

SUMMARY: Public Meeting: U.S. Election Assistance Commission Standards Board 2023 

Annual Meeting

DATES: Tuesday, April 18, 2023 11:00 AM-7:00 PM Eastern and Wednesday, April 19, 2023 

10:30 AM- 2:00 PM Eastern

ADDRESSES:

Hyatt Regency Phoenix, 122 N. 2nd St., Phoenix, AZ 85004

The meeting is open to the public.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kristen Muthig, Telephone: (202) 897-9285, Email: kmuthig@eac.gov

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Purpose: In accordance with the Government in the Sunshine Act (Sunshine Act), Public Law 

94-409, as amended (5 U.S.C. 552b), the U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) will 

conduct an annual meeting of the EAC Standards Board to conduct regular business, discuss 

EAC updates and upcoming programs, and discuss the Voluntary Voting System Guidelines

(VVSG) 2.0 and electronic poll book pilot program.

Agenda: The U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) Standards Board will hold their 2023

Annual Meeting primarily to conduct an annual review the VVSG 2.0 Requirements and 

implementation, review the status of the EAC’s e-poll book pilot program, discuss ongoing EAC 
programs, and address election official security and mental health concerns. This meeting will 

include a question and answer discussion between board members and EAC staff.

Board members will also review FACA Board membership guidelines and policies with EAC 

Acting General Counsel and receive a general update about the EAC programing. The Board will 

also elect nine members to the Executive Board Committee.

Background: On February 10, 2021 the U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) announced 

the adoption of the Voluntary Voting System Guidelines (VVSG) 2.0, the fifth iteration of 

national level voting system standards. The Federal Election Commission published the first two 

sets of federal standards in 1990 and 2002. The EAC then adopted Version 1.0 of the VVSG on 

December 13, 2005. In an effort to update and improve version 1.0 of the VVSG, on March 31, 

2015, the EAC commissioners unanimously approved VVSG 1.1.

HAVA designates a 110-member Standards Board to assist EAC in carrying out its mandates 

under the law. The board consists of 55 state election officials selected by their respective chief 

state election official, and 55 local election officials selected through a process supervised by the 

chief state election official.

The full agenda will be posted in advance on the EAC website: https://www.eac.gov. 

STATUS:

This meeting will be open to the public.

Camden Kelliher,

Associate Counsel, U.S. Election Assistance Commission.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-21-00630-CV

In re Hudson Design Development

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Hudson Design Development, Inc., (Hudson) sued 3204 Clawson, LLC, (Clawson)

for expenses incurred during a construction project. The trial court signed a default judgment in 

favor of Hudson, stating that Clawson failed to appear and answer and awarding Hudson 

damages in the amount of $594,634.52 along with prejudgment interest and post-judgment 

interest. More than one month later, Clawson filed a motion asking the trial court to determine 

that the default judgment occurred when Clawson received actual notice rather than the date the 

judgment was signed and then grant a new trial. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 306a, 320. After holding a 

hearing, the trial court entered an order granting Clawson’s motion, vacating the default 

judgment entered previously, and restoring the case to the active court docket. Following that 

ruling, Hudson filed this petition for writ of mandamus, asking this Court to order the trial court 

to vacate its order. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.1. Having reviewed the petition, Clawson’s response,

and the record, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See id. R. 52.8.
2

__________________________________________

Thomas J. Baker, Justice

Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Smith

Filed: December 31, 2021
# C_2022398EN.01002602.xml

| 17.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 398/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 398/26

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 4 August 2022 — Biogen Netherlands v Commission

(Case T-269/22 R)

(Interim relief - Medicinal products for human use - Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 - Marketing authorisation for Dimethyl fumarate Polpharma - dimethyl fumarate - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency)

(2022/C 398/31)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Biogen Netherlands BV (Badhoevedorp, Netherlands) (represented by: C. Schoonderbeek, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Haasbeek and A. Sipos, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its application based on Articles 278 and 279 TFEU, the applicant seeks suspension of the operation of Commission Implementing Decision C(2022) 3253 final of 13 May 2022 granting marketing authorisation under Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council for ‘Dimethyl fumarate Polpharma — dimethyl fumarate’ as a medicinal product for human use.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,009,195
<ALLOWANCES>                                   101,483
<INVENTORY>                                  1,409,333
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,930,091
<PP&E>                                       3,011,088
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,304,265
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,660,331
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,025,578
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        46,041
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,660,331
<SALES>                                      9,486,168
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,486,168
<CGS>                                        6,717,554
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,717,554
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,071,526
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (4,837)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (298,075)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (62,207)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (235,868)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (235,868)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
February 7, 2003

PSEG Power LLC
80 Park Plaza
Newark, New Jersey 07102

We have audited the financial statements of PSEG Power LLC and its subsidiaries
as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 2002, included in your Annual Report on Form 10-K to the
Securities and Exchange Commission and have issued our report thereon dated
February 7, 2003, which expresses an unqualified opinion. Note 3 to such
financial statements contains a description of your adoption, during the year
ended December 31, 2002, of a change in the method of accounting to present
certain energy trading contract assets and liabilities on a net basis where the
legal right of offset exists. In our judgment, such change is to an alternative
accounting principle that is preferable under the circumstances.

Yours truly,

Deloitte & Touche LLP
Parsippany, New Jersey
# C_2022340EN.01005801.xml

| 5.9.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 340/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.9.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 340/58

---

Order of the General Court of 14 July 2022 — Dehaen v EUIPO — National Geographic Society (NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC)

(Case T-157/22) (1)

(2022/C 340/80)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 207, 23.5.2022.

---
SOMATOGEN, INC.
                      COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
                        (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                    Three Months Ended          Nine Months Ended
                                         March 31,                  March 31,
                                    ------------------          -----------------
                                       1997      1996           1997         1996
                                       ----      ----           ----         ----
<S>                                    <C>       <C>            <C>          <C>
Weighted average common shares
      outstanding                      20,800    20,630         20,743       19,977
Dilution effect of outstanding options
      and warrants (as determined 
      under the treasury stock method)    249        --             --           --
                                      -------   -------        -------     --------
Weighted average number of common
      shares and equivalents
      outstanding                      21,049    20,630         20,743       19,977
                                      =======   =======        =======     ========
Net income (loss)                     $ 1,567   $(5,384)       $(7,174)    $(13,143)
                                      =======   =======        =======     ========
Net income (loss) per common and
      common equivalent share         $  0.07   $ (0.26)       $ (0.35)    $  (0.66)
                                      =======   =======        =======     ========
</TABLE>
(1) Fully diluted net income per share is the same as primary net income 
    per share

(2) Common stock equivalents are only included when the effect of their 
    inclusion would be dilutive.
No. 11-10808.

#### Jiggetts *v.*City of New York, New York, et al.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.