alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 47 (Tuesday, March 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 11221]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6057]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[ES-960-1910-00-4377] ES-48640, Group 171, Minnesota


Notice of Filing of Plat of Survey; Minnesota

    The plat of the dependent resurvey of a portion of the west 
boundary of the Grand Portage Indian Reservation, Townships 63 and 64 
North, Range 4 East, Fourth Principal Meridian, Minnesota, will be 
officially filed in Eastern States, Springfield, Virginia at 7:30 a.m., 
on April 17, 1997.
    The survey was requested by the Bureau of Indian Affairs.
    All inquiries or protests concerning the technical aspects of the 
survey must be sent to the Chief Cadastral Surveyor, Eastern States, 
Bureau of Land Management, 7450 Boston Boulevard, Springfield, Virginia 
22153, prior to 7:30 a.m., April 17, 1997.
    Copies of the plat will be made available upon request and 
prepayment of the reproduction fee of $2.75 per copy.

    Dated: March 3, 1997.
Stephen G. Kopach,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor.
[FR Doc. 97-6057 Filed 3-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GJ-P
EX-10.7(b)



 Exhibit 10.7(b) 
 June 1, 2013 
 Blackwater Capital Management, LLC 

36 Cattano Avenue 
 Suite 601 

Morristown, N.J. 07960 
 Attention:
Mr. Andy Silwanowicz 
  

	 	Re:	Management Agreement Renewals 

 Dear
Mr. Silwanowicz: 
 We are writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the commodity pools to which reference is made
below (the “Management Agreements”). We are extending the term of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2014 and all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged. 

 

	 	•	 	 Emerging CTA Portfolio L.P. 



	 	•	 	 Global Diversified Futures Fund L.P. 



	 	•	 	 Blackwater Master Fund L.P. 



	 	•	 	 MSSB Spectrum Technical L.P. 


 Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of Mr. Brian Centner at the address above or fax to 212-296-6868. If you have any
questions I can be reached at 212-296-1292. 
 Very truly yours, 

 

			
	CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC
		
	By:	 	/s/ Damian George
		 	Damian George
		 	Chief Financial Officer and Director
	
	BLACKWATER CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC
		
	By:            	 	/s/ Andy Silwanowicz


			
		
	 Print Name:
	 	Andy Silwanowicz
		
	 DG/sr
116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 895 

AN ACT 

To allow tribal grant schools to participate in the Federal 

Employee Health Benefits program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 895 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Tribal School Federal 

3 Insurance Parity Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO THE INDIAN HEALTH CARE IM5 PROVEMENT ACT. 

6 Section 409 of the Indian Health Care Improvement 

7 Act (25 U.S.C. 1647b) is amended by inserting ‘‘or the 

8 Tribally Controlled Schools Act of 1988 (25 U.S.C. 2501 

9 et seq.)’’ after ‘‘(25 U.S.C. 450 et seq.)’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 21, 

2020. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 895 

AN ACT 

To allow tribal grant schools to participate in the 

Federal Employee Health Benefits program.
#### Ida R. North v. George C. Vilas.

154 So. 245.

Opinion Filed April 16, 1934.

*C. L. McKaig,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Frank Redd,*for Defendant in Error.

Buford, J.

— In this case judgment was entered on a note for the sum of $1,000.00, together with $276.73, interest and also $227.66 as attorney’s fees.

The judgment for attorney’s fees, as shown by certificate of the judge, was' based upon an affidavit in the following language:

> “State of Florida,

> “County of Sarasota.

> “Before me, the undersigned authority, a Notary Public in and for the State of Florida at Large, personally came on this 30 day of August, A. D. 1933, J. Irvin Walden, who being by me first duly sworn, deposes and says: That he is a practicing attorney at the bar of this Court, and as such he is familiar with counsel fees usually reckoned and awarded to counsel for plaintiff in suits on promissory notes, wherein the note provided for the payment of a reasonable attorney fee, that deponent has examined the pleadings in the above entitled cause and has calculated the principal and interest due and owing on the note sued on, and in his opinion a reasonable fee to be awarded counsel for plaintiff in this suit is the sum of $100.00 for filing suit, plus 10% *561of the principal and interest now owing on the note, which deponent has calculated to be the sum of $1,276.63, making a total fee to be awarded counsel for plaintiff the sum of $227.66.

> “J. Irvin Walden (Signed)

> “Subscribed and sworn to before me, the date aforesaid.

> “Paul C. Albritton (Signed) “Circuit Judge.”

The affidavit fails to show what amount, if any, had been agreed to be paid by the plaintiff to his attorney for services in this suit. Therefore, the entry of a judgment for such attorney’s fees was' error under the authority of the case' of Sarasota Publishing Company v. E. C. Palmer & Co., Ltd., 102 Fla. 303, 135 Sou. 521.

If the plaintiff shall within- twenty days after the filing of the mandate in this cause in the court below enter a remittitur in the sum of $227.66, the judgment of $1,276.63 will stand affirmed as of date of entry thereof; otherwise, the judgment shall stand reversed and the cause be remanded for new trial.

So ordered.

Whitfield and Terrell, J. J., concur.

Davis, C. J., concurs specially.

Davis, C. J.

(concurring specially). — I concur in the opinion ■ solely because I consider I am irrevocably bound by several earlier decisions which have no.w become the settled law of this State. But I cannot refrain from expressing my inability to understand the legal consistency of our rule which so completely ignores confessed allegations of a declaration alleging in terms an agreement to pay an attorney’s fee, a default, the bringing of a suit and a claim for the fee agreed to, all of which is legally admitted and con*562fessed *on the face of the record*by the adjudicated default. Just why an attorney whose name is signed to a declaration on a note should» have to make oath that he is not rendering his services in the cause to the plaintiff *gratis*in order for plaintiff to recover his attorney’s fee indemnity is to my understanding incomprehensible.
# C_2023007EN.01001401.xml

| 9.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 7/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 7/14

---

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 November 2022 — (request for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice di pace di Lecce — Italy) — Criminal proceedings against AB

(Case C-243/22) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Scope - Article 49 - Principles of legality and proportionality of criminal offences and penalties - Exclusion of the criminal liability of the infringement on account of its lack of a particularly serious nature - National case-law prohibiting the application of a national rule before the Magistrate - Lack of connection to EU law - Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court)

(2023/C 7/16)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Giudice di pace di Lecce

Criminal proceedings against

AB

Operative part of the order

The Court of Justice of the European Union clearly lacks jurisdiction to answer the questions referred by the Giudice di pace di Lecce (Magistrate, Italy), by decision of 28 January 2022.

---

(1)  Date lodged: 6 April 2022

---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8982 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8982

  To amend the Federal Reserve Act to require the Federal Open Market 
   Committee to establish interest rates on balances maintained at a 
            Federal Reserve Bank by depository institutions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 16, 2020

Mr. Hill of Arkansas introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                 to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Federal Reserve Act to require the Federal Open Market 
   Committee to establish interest rates on balances maintained at a 
            Federal Reserve Bank by depository institutions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``FOMC Policy Responsibility Act''.

SEC. 2. INTEREST RATES ON BALANCES MAINTAINED AT A FEDERAL RESERVE BANK 
              BY DEPOSITORY INSTITUTIONS ESTABLISHED BY FEDERAL OPEN 
              MARKET COMMITTEE.

    Subparagraph (A) of section 19(b)(12) of the Federal Reserve Act 
(12 U.S.C. 461(b)(12)(A)) is amended by inserting ``established by the 
Federal Open Market Committee'' after ``rate or rates''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 24.01

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of the undersigned, being a director
or officer of SCANA Corporation ("SCANA"), South Carolina Electric & Gas Company
("SCE&G") and Public Service Company of North Carolina, Inc. ("PSNC"), hereby
constitutes and appoints William B. Timmerman and Kevin B. Marsh, and each of
them, his or her true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of
substitution and resubstitution, for him or her and in his or her name, place
and stead in any and all capacities, to sign one or more Annual Reports for
SCANA's, SCE&G's and PSNC's fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, on Form 10-K
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or such other form as any
such attorney-in-fact may deem necessary or desirable, any amendments thereto,
and all additional amendments thereto, each in such form as they or any one of
them may approve, and to file the same with all exhibits thereto and other
documents in connection therewith with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power
and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and
necessary to be done so that such Annual Report shall comply with the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the applicable Rules and Regulations
adopted or issued pursuant thereto, as fully and to all intents and purposes as
he or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that
said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them or their substitute or
resubstitute, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has hereunto set his or her hand
this 20th day of February 2003.




s/B. L. Amick s/J. A. Bennett B. L. Amick J. A. Bennett Director Director


s/W. B. Bookhart, Jr. s/W. C. Burkhardt W. B. Bookhart, Jr. W. C. Burkhardt
Director Director


s/E. T. Freeman s/D. M. Hagood E. T. Freeman D. M. Hagood Director Director


s/W. H. Hipp s/L. M. Miller W. H. Hipp L. M. Miller Director Director


s/M. K. Sloan s/H. C. Stowe M. K. Sloan H. C. Stowe Director Director


s/W. B. Timmerman s/G. S. York W. B. Timmerman G. S. York Director Director
Submitted April 1, 2016,

reversed and remanded June 14, 2017

#### ROLAND LEE SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, *v.*Jeff PREMO, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary, *Defendant-Respondent.*

Marion County Circuit Court

15CV07716; A159336

395 P3d 959

Jed Peterson and O’Connor Weber LLP filed the brief for appellant.

Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Paul L. Smith, Deputy Solicitor General, and Greg Rios, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Duncan, Presiding Judge, and DeVore, Judge, and Garrett, Judge.

*302PER CURIAM

Plaintiff appeals the trial court’s judgment dismissing his 2015 petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Plaintiff previously petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus in 2013, and the trial court dismissed that petition without prejudice for failure to state a claim. The trial court dismissed plaintiffs 2015 petition on its own motion, concluding that plaintiffs claims were “duplicative of* * * claim [s] previously considered and dismissed by this court” in the 2013 petition. *See*ORS 34.710 (“No question once finally determined upon a proceeding by habeas corpus shall be reexamined upon another proceeding of the same kind.”). Plaintiff argues that the trial court erred in concluding that he was precluded from asserting the same claims in the 2015 petition.

Defendant agrees with plaintiff. According to both parties, the trial court erred because plaintiffs 2013 petition was dismissed without prejudice, which does not preclude plaintiff from raising the same claims in the 2015 petition. *See Clark v. Gates,*138 Or App 160, 165, 906 P2d 863 (1995) (“A dismissal without prejudice cannot give rise to claim preclusion.”); *see also Fort v. Persson,*275 Or App 573, 574, 364 P3d 357 (2015) (accepting defendant’s concession that the trial court erred by dismissing plaintiffs habeas petition on claim preclusion grounds because earlier dismissals were without prejudice). Defendant concedes that we should reverse and remand the trial court’s judgment. We accept defendant’s concession. Accordingly, we reverse and remand the judgment of dismissal.

Reversed and remanded.
~ISTY 2 MOA 

Independence 

Stack: <400'AGL 

Class G, SFC-1200'AGL 

Radio: CTAF 123.0 

wego Co (FZY) 

Radio: CTAF 123.0 

res 

0
Exhibit 31.1  I, Dempsey Mork, certify that:  1.           I have reviewed this quarterly report for the period ended March 31, 2010 on Form 10-Q of Knickerbocker Capital Corp.;  2.           Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.           Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.           The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a)           Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b)           Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c)           Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.           The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)           All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b)           Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  May 13, 2010  /s/ Dempsey Mork Dempsey Mork Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Puget Energy, Inc. and Puget Sound Energy, Inc. (the “Companies”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-K”), I, Kimberly J. Harris, thePresident and Chief Executive Officer of the Companies, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies.











Date:  March 4, 2011/s/Kimberly J. HarrisKimberly J. HarrisPresident and Chief Executive Officer
August 10, 2011

Summary of calls with National Associ ation of Clean Air Agencies (NACAA)

We have had 2 calls with NACAA (State permitting agencies) explaining the goals and provisions of the SIP CALL and FIP proposals a nd also responding to questions. We have another call scheduled for August 11, 2010 to pr ovide a status update on these proposals and respond to further questions from State permit writers.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8560 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8560

    To provide first-time, low-level, nonviolent simple possession 
 offenders an opportunity to expunge that conviction after successful 
                 completion of court-imposed probation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 9, 2020

  Mr. Jeffries (for himself and Mr. Taylor) introduced the following 
       bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To provide first-time, low-level, nonviolent simple possession 
 offenders an opportunity to expunge that conviction after successful 
                 completion of court-imposed probation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Kenneth P. Thompson Begin Again 
Act''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATING AGE REQUIREMENT FOR EXPUNGEMENT OF CERTAIN 
              CONVICTIONS FOR SIMPLE POSSESSION OF CONTROLLED 
              SUBSTANCES BY NONVIOLENT OFFENDERS.

    Section 3607(c) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``and the person was less than twenty-one years old at the 
time of the offense,''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9047 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 9047

To amend section 6428A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase 
           recovery rebate amounts to $2,000 for individuals.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 24, 2020

   Mr. Neal introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on the 
 Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 
   each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend section 6428A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase 
           recovery rebate amounts to $2,000 for individuals.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Caring for Americans with 
Supplemental Help Act of 2020'' or the ``CASH Act of 2020''.

SEC. 2. RECOVERY REBATE AMOUNTS INCREASED.

    (a) In General.--Section 6428A of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986, as added by section 272 of the COVID-related Tax Relief Act of 
2020, is amended by striking ``$600'' each place it appears and 
inserting ``$2,000'', and by striking ``$1,200'' each place it appears 
and inserting ``$4,000''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section are 
contingent upon the enactment of the COVID-related Tax Relief Act of 
2020 and shall apply (if at all) as if included in the enactment of 
section 272 of such Act.

SEC. 3. BUDGETARY EFFECTS.

    (a) Statutory PAYGO Scorecards.--The budgetary effects of this Act 
shall not be entered on either PAYGO scorecard maintained pursuant to 
section 4(d) of the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010.
    (b) Senate PAYGO Scorecards.--The budgetary effects of this Act 
shall not be entered on any PAYGO scorecard maintained for purposes of 
section 4106 of H. Con. Res. 71 (115th Congress).
                                 <all>
```