alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997             SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                               0              24,746,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0              41,205,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0               1,927,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0              13,815,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0               6,592,000
<PP&E>                                               0              62,037,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0              15,925,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0             203,412,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0              29,035,000
<BONDS>                                              0             116,566,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                  10,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0              52,881,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0             203,412,000
<SALES>                                     80,086,000             212,798,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            80,086,000             212,798,000
<CGS>                                       48,385,000             130,124,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               48,385,000             130,124,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            25,234,000              67,167,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,683,000               6,893,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,716,000               8,588,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   966,000               1,682,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,750,000               6,906,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0             (7,769,000)
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,750,000               (863,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.15                  (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.15                  (0.05)
        

</TABLE>
#### LEDBETTER, C. v. PBPP

1209 CD 2015

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

10/16/2017

Board of Probation & Parole, 483 EG

Affirmed
# C_2021368EN.01003601.xml

| 13.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 368/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 368/36

---

Action brought on 30 July 2021 — G-Core Innovations v EUIPO — Coretransform (G CORELABS)

(Case T-454/21)

(2021/C 368/52)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: G-Core Innovations Sàrl (Contern, Luxembourg) (represented by: L. Axel Karnøe Søndergaard, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Coretransform GmbH (Berlin, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark G CORELABS in Orange, Red, Silver, Black and Grey — Application for registration No 14 955 017

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 May 2021 in Case R 22/2021-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision in its entirety and allow the trademark to be registered in respect of all the goods applied for; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision in its entirety and allow the trademark to be registered in respect of all the goods applied for;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs incurred by the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs incurred by the applicant.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 881 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 881

  To require certain meetings of the Tennessee Valley Authority to be 
      transparent and open to the public, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 30, 2019

 Mr. Burchett introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require certain meetings of the Tennessee Valley Authority to be 
      transparent and open to the public, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Tennessee Valley Authority 
Transparency Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. TRANSPARENCY AND AVAILABILITY OF MEETINGS.

    Section 2(g)(2) of the Tennessee Valley Authority Act of 1933 is 
amended to read as follows:
            ``(2) Meetings.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The Board shall meet at least 4 
                times each year.
                    ``(B) Transparency.--The Board shall, with respect 
                to any meeting of the Board or a subcommittee of the 
                Board for which a vote is not scheduled--
                            ``(i) hold such meeting in public;
                            ``(ii) provide public notice of no fewer 
                        than 6 calendar days, through the website of 
                        the Board, of any such meeting; and
                            ``(iii) make publicly available the minutes 
                        and summaries of any such meeting.
                    ``(C) Emergency meetings.--Subparagraph (B)(ii) 
                shall not apply if the chairman of the Board designates 
                a meeting as an emergency special meeting.''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 45 (Friday, March 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10550-10551]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5616]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP96-306-000]


Paiute Pipeline Company; Notice of Informal Settlement Conference

March 3, 1997.
    Take notice that an informal settlement conference will be convened 
in this proceeding on March 10, 1997 at 10:00 a.m., at the offices of 
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, DC, 20426, for the purpose of exploring the possible 
settlement of the above-referenced docket.

[[Page 10551]]

    Any party, as defined by 18 CFR 385.102(c), or any participant, as 
defined by 18 CFR 385.102(b), is invited to attend. Persons wishing to 
become a party must move to intervene and receive intervenor status 
pursuant to the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 385.214).
    For additional information, please contact Irene E. Szopo at (202) 
208-1602 or Anja M. Clark at (202) 208-2034.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-5616 Filed 3-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
**Exhibit 32.01**

**SCANA      CORPORATION**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/William                B. Timmerman                                      |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| William                B. Timmerman                                         |   |
| Chairman                of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer |
# C_2023278EN.01002201.xml

| 7.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 278/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 278/22

---

Order of the General Court of 21 June 2023 — Repasi v Commission

(Case T-628/22) (1)

(Action for annulment - Environment - Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1214 - Taxonomy - Economic activities relating to fossil gas and nuclear energy - Inclusion in sustainable economic activities - Member of the European Parliament - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility)

(2023/C 278/33)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: René Repasi (Karlsruhe, Germany) (represented by: H.-G. Kamann, D. Fouquet, lawyers, F. Kainer and M. Nettesheim, professors)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Erlbacher, A. Nijenhuis and G. von Rintelen, acting as Agents)

Re:

By his action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1214 of 9 March 2022 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2139 as regards economic activities in certain energy sectors and Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2178 as regards specific public disclosures for those economic activities (OJ 2022 L 188, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | There is no longer any need to rule on the application for leave to intervene submitted by the French Republic. |
| --- | --- |

2.

There is no longer any need to rule on the application for leave to intervene submitted by the French Republic.

| 3. | The applicant shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The applicant shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

| 4. | The French Republic shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The French Republic shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 24, 23.1.2023.

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7372

SHANNON J. MASTERS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WILLIAM K. DAVIS, Commissioner of Corrections; DUDLEY BURGESS, Administrator of the Southern Regional Jail; CECIL H. UNDERWOOD, Governor; STEVEN CANTERBURY, Director of Regional Jail and Correctional Facilities; WILLIAM DUNCEL, [sic] Deputy Commissioner of Corrections; JIMMY PLEAR, Chief of Operations Regional Jail Authority; DAN HUCK, Chief of Operations Regional Jail Authority; DALE MANUEL, Chairman of the Legislatures Interim Committee on Regional Jails, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Joseph Robert Goodwin, District Judge. (CA-98-624-2) Submitted: March 25, 1999 Decided: March 30, 1999 Before WILKINS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.2 Shannon J. Masters, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:Shannon J. Masters, a West Virginia inmate, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Masters v. Davis , No. CA-98- 624-2 (S.D.W. Va. Sept. 2, 1998). We deny the motion to dismiss certain Appellees as parties and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         499,300
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  124,200
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       2,502,400
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,175,900
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      1,097,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,175,900
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               180,300
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   69,800
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                60,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              27,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    23,500
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.10



</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronald David JONES, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-55131

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted February 12, 2018 Pasadena, California

Filed March 1, 2018

Helen H. Hong, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Office of the US Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee

. Kara Hartzler, Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant

Before: McKEOWN and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges, and QUIST,* District Judge.

*

 The Honorable Gordon J. Quist, United States District Judge for the Western District of Michigan, sitting by designation.

*722MEMORANDUM **

Defendant, Ronald David Jones, Jr., appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review the denial of a section 2255 motion de novo, *United States v. Reves,*774 F.3d 562, 564 (9th Cir. 2014), and we affirm.

In 1994, following convictions of armed bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) and (d), knowing use of a firearm during the bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c), and felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(g), the district court sentenced Jones as an armed career criminal pursuant to the Armed Career Criminal Act (“ACCA”), 18 U.S.C. § 922(e). Jones’s three ACCA predicate convictions included robbery and attempted robbery in violation of California Penal Code §§211 and 611/211. Jones argues that after *Johnson v. United States,*— U.S.-, 135 S.Ct. 2551, 192 L.Ed.2d 569 (2015), and *Welch v. United States,*— U.S. -, 136 S.Ct. 1257, 194 L.Ed.2d 387 (2016), he no longer has three qualifying convictions required to trigger the enhanced sentence under the ACCA. Jones further argues that federal armed bank robbery is not a “crime of violence” under the force/elements clause in 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A).

Jones may not rely on the rule announced in *Johnson*to attack his California robbery convictions as ACCA predicates because the district court relied “on a constitutionally valid legal theory” in sentencing Jones. *United States v. Geozos,*870 F.3d 890, 895 (9th Cir. 2017). Although the district court “suppose[d] [that] it’s safer to say [that attempted robbery] presents a serious potential risk of physical injury to another because you’re talking about an attempt,” in the end, the court held that “attempted robbery ... is in fact a predicate violent felony under 18 U.S.C. 924(e) either (1) or (2).” The district court’s reliance on an invalid ground as well does not undermine its finding of a violent felony because a predicate conviction need only meet one of the ACCA’s definitions of “violent felony.”

Finally, our recent decision in *United States v. Watson,*881 F.3d 782 (9th Cir. 2018), forecloses Jones’s argument that armed bank robbery is not a “crime of violence” under the force/elements clause of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** **

**Exhibit 35.1**

 

ANNUAL SERVICER’S COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

 

This Compliance Certificate is furnishedpursuant to Section 4.10 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”), dated as of January 21, 2015, by andamong Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust 2015-A, Hyundai Capital America, as seller and servicer (the “Servicer”), HyundaiABS Funding, LLC (formerly known as Hyundai ABS Funding Corporation), as depositor, and Citibank, N.A., as indenture trustee andItem 1123 of Regulation AB. The undersigned hereby certifies that:

 

1)          Iam a duly authorized officer of the Servicer.

 

2)          Areview of the activities of the Servicer from January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Relevant Period”) andof the Servicer’s performance under the Agreement during the Relevant Period has been made under my supervision.

 

3)          Basedon such review, the Servicer has, to the best of my knowledge, fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all materialrespects throughout the Relevant Period.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have duly executed this Compliance Certificatethis 15th day of March, 2019.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8820 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8820

   To extend the temporary relief for Federal student loan borrowers 
                     provided under the CARES Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 24, 2020

  Ms. Underwood (for herself, Mrs. Davis of California, Mr. Ryan, Mr. 
 Smith of Washington, Mr. Deutch, Ms. Dean, Mr. Gonzalez of Texas, Ms. 
Tlaib, Mr. Cisneros, Mr. Clay, Mr. Suozzi, Ms. Porter, Mr. Sablan, Mr. 
Cooper, Mr. Neguse, Ms. Lee of California, Ms. Velazquez, Mr. Larson of 
 Connecticut, Ms. Brownley of California, Mr. Garamendi, Mr. Danny K. 
Davis of Illinois, Mr. McGovern, Mr. Malinowski, Ms. Norton, Mr. Harder 
of California, Ms. Schakowsky, Ms. Schrier, Mrs. Dingell, Mr. Garcia of 
Illinois, Mr. Moulton, Ms. Adams, Ms. Titus, Mr. Panetta, Mr. Morelle, 
Ms. Houlahan, Ms. Bonamici, Mr. Thompson of Mississippi, Mr. McNerney, 
   Mr. Khanna, Mr. Welch, Mr. Michael F. Doyle of Pennsylvania, Mr. 
  DeSaulnier, Mr. Richmond, Mr. Foster, Mr. Takano, Mr. Grijalva, Mr. 
Cohen, Ms. Meng, Mr. Lowenthal, Mr. Soto, Ms. Matsui, Mr. Pascrell, Mr. 
 Levin of Michigan, Ms. Jayapal, Mr. Johnson of Georgia, Ms. Scanlon, 
 Mr. Price of North Carolina, Ms. Stevens, Mr. Payne, Ms. Lofgren, Mr. 
  Trone, Mr. Cartwright, Ms. Clark of Massachusetts, Mr. Cleaver, Ms. 
     Speier, Mrs. Bustos, Mr. Rush, Mr. Sarbanes, Mr. Ted Lieu of 
California, Ms. DeGette, Ms. Kuster of New Hampshire, Mrs. Hayes, Mrs. 
     Carolyn B. Maloney of New York, Mr. Cardenas, Ms. Judy Chu of 
  California, Mr. Swalwell of California, Mrs. Trahan, Ms. Moore, Ms. 
Johnson of Texas, and Mr. Raskin) introduced the following bill; which 
          was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend the temporary relief for Federal student loan borrowers 
                     provided under the CARES Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Pandemic Accommodation to Support 
Students Act'' or the ``PASS Act''.

SEC. 2. TEMPORARY RELIEF FOR FEDERAL STUDENT LOAN BORROWERS.

    Section 3513 of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security 
Act (20 U.S.C. 1001 note) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``2020'' and inserting 
        ``2021''; and
            (2) in subsection (g)(2), by striking ``2020'' and 
        inserting ``2021''.
                                 <all>
```