alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  The undersigned officers each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Caspian International Oil Corporation on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  August 12, 2007 /s/ Nurlan Janseitov Nurlan Janseitov Chief Executive Officer  August 12, 2007 /s/ David Fulton David Fulton Chief Financial Officer   This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6456

NELSON JACKSON MORRIS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RON ANGELONE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge.

(CA-95-610-R)

Submitted: July 23, 1996 Decided: August 5, 1996

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nelson Jackson Morris, Appellant Pro Se. Robert B. Condon, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his habeas corpus petition, 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988), as

amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996,

Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1217. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal; to

the extent that a certificate of appealability is required, we deny

such a certificate. We dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the

district court. Morris v. Angelone, No. CA-95-610-R (W.D. Va.

Mar. 19, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-18-0000703

05-DEC-2019

07:53 AM
No. 11-1205.

No. 11-1238.

No. 11-1299.

No. 11-1345.

No. 11-1354.

No. 11-1356.

No. 11-8335.

No. 11-8630.

No. 11-8780.

No. 11-9085.

No. 11-9150.

No. 11-9156.

No. 11-9208.

No. 11-9269.

No. 11-9274.

No. 11-9327.

No. 11-9365.

No. 11-9379.

No. 11-9451.

No. 11-9477.

No. 11-9508.

#### Bush et ux. *v.*Slagh et al., Petters *v.*United States, Calabrese *v.*Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services; Calabrese *v.*Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services; Calabrese *v.*Department of Health and Human Services et al.; Calabrese *v.*Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services; Calabrese *v.*Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services; and Calabrese *v.*Department of Health and Human Services, Hendrickson *v.*United States, Dee *v.*Maine, Memorylink Corp. *v.*Motorola, Inc., et al., Pierre et al. *v.*Holder, Attorney General, Miranda *v.*Horel, Warden, Francis *v.*Standifird, Warden, Qazza *v.*City of Orange, California, et al., Pointer *v.*Dormire, Superintendent, Jefferson City Correctional Center, Walters *v.*Kids Are Us Learning Centers, Inc., Garcia *v.*Small, Warden, Honesto *v.*Brown, Governor of California, et al., Byrd *v.*Florida Department of Corrections et al., In re Durschmidt, Laroche *v.*Maryland Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation, et al., Fennell v. California Republican Party et al., Hill *v.*Muwwakkil, Satterfield *v.*Johnson et al., Kendrick *v.*Union Baptist Church et al., *962Agim *v.*Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Dennis *v.*Illinois Department of Employment Security et al., In re Jones, Trzeciak *v.*State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., Michael *v.*Wetzel, Secretary, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al., Brown *v.*Michigan Department of Corrections et al., King *v.*Florida Parole Commission et al., Ballard *v.*United States, Gorbatova *v.*Gaeta et al., Thuan Huy Ha *v.*United States, McKnight *v.*United States,

*961566 U. S. 1022;

566 U. S. 990;

*ante,*p. 917;

*ante,*p. 906;

*ante,*p. 918;

566 U. S. 1035;

*ante,*p. 918;

566 U. S. 926;

566 U. S. 944;

566 U. S. 992;

566 U. S. 993;

566 U. S. 994;

566 U. S. 995;

566 U. S. 997;

566 U. S. 997;

566 U. S. 985;

566 U. S. 1013;

566 U. S. 1013;

566 U. S. 1023;

566 U. S. 1024;

566 U. S. 1024:

*962No. 11-9556.

No. 11-9655.

No. 11-9676.

No. 11-9721.

No. 11-9746.

No. 11-9778.

No. 11-9851.

No. 11-9871.

No. 11-10035.

No. 11-10075.

No. 11-10226.

566 U. S. 1036;

566 U. S. 1038;

566 U. S. 973;

566 U. S. 1039;

*ante,*p. 908;

*ante,*p. 909;

*ante,*p. 909;

566 U. S. 1015;

566 U. S. 1029;

566 U. S. 1030; and

*ante,*p. 911. Petitions for rehearing denied.
Submitted February 23, 2016,

affirmed February 15, 2017

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Plaintiff-Respondent, v.*ANDREW MICHAEL WINKELMAN, aka Andrew Michael Feldman, *Defendant-Appellant.*

Washington County Circuit Court

C112051CR; A157591

388 P3d 1166

Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Marc D. Brown, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant.

Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Paul L. Smith, Deputy Solicitor General, and Timothy A. Sylwester, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Ortega, Presiding Judge, and Lagesen, Judge, and Garrett, Judge.

PER CURIAM

Affirmed. *State v. Silsby,*282 Or App 104, 110-13, 386 P3d 172 (2016), *rev den,*360 Or 752 (2017).
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 47 (Tuesday, March 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11170-11171]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5930]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP97-270-000]


Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation, Notice of Proposed 
Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

March 5, 1997.
    Take notice that on February 28, 1997, Texas Eastern Transmission 
Corporation (Texas Eastern) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Sixth Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets with a 
proposed effective date of April 1, 1997:

Fourth Revised Sheet No. 145
Fourth Revised Sheet No. 146
Fourth Revised Sheet Nos. 147-155

    Texas Eastern states that the filing is submitted pursuant to 
Section 15.2(G),

[[Page 11171]]

Transition Cost Tracker, of the General Terms and Conditions of Texas 
Eastern's FERC Gas Tariff, Sixth Revised Volume No. 1, and as a limited 
application pursuant to Section 4 of the Natural Gas Act, 15 U.S.C. 
Section 717c (1988), and the Rules and Regulations of the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission promulgated thereunder.
    Texas Eastern states that the purpose of the filing is to continue 
its recovery of Order No. 636 transition costs incurred by upstream 
pipelines and flowed through to Texas Eastern as approved by the 
Commission by order dated March 19, 1996 in Docket No. RP96-156-000, 
Texas Eastern's last filing to recover upstream transition cost. Texas 
Eastern states that this filing covers approximately $2.1 million of 
upstream transition costs for the period January 1, 1996 through 
December 31, 1996, which is a reduction of approximately 34% from the 
last filing.
    Texas Eastern states that copies of the filing were served on all 
firm customers of Texas Eastern and applicable state commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as provided 
in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-5930 Filed 3-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3

[LETTER HEAD OF RYDER SCOTT COMPANY]

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS

        As independent oil and gas consultants, Ryder Scott Company, L.P.,
hereby consents to the use of our reserve reports dated as of December 31, 2000,
and December 31, 2001 and to all references to our firm included in or made a
part of the Mission Resources Corporation's Form 10-K to be filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on or about March 25, 2003, and to the
incorporation by reference thereof into Mission Resources Corporation's
previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-63562,
333-54798, 333-57827, 333-27707 and 33-91326).


                                             /s/ Ryder Scott Company, L.P.

                                             RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.

Houston, Texas
March 25, 2003
#### COM. v. ROBINS, J.

2047 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/27/2017

CP-51-CR-0003430-2009 (Philadelphia)

Affirmed
In the Senate of the United States, 

January 16, 2020. 

Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 886) entitled ‘‘An Act to direct the Attorney General to establish and carry out a Veteran Treatment Court 

Program.’’, do pass with the following 

AMENDMENT: 

Strike all after the enacting clause and insert the 

following: 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veteran Treatment 

3 Court Coordination Act of 2019’’. 

4 SEC. 2. SENSE OF CONGRESS. 

5 It is the sense of Congress that veterans treatment 

6 courts are a successful program aimed at helping veterans 

7 charged with nonviolent crimes receive the help and the 

8 benefits for which the veterans are entitled. 
2 

† HR 886 EAS 

1 SEC. 3. VETERAN TREATMENT COURT PROGRAM. 

2 (a) ESTABLISHMENT.—Subject to the availability of 

3 appropriations, in coordination with the Secretary of Vet4 erans Affairs, the Attorney General shall establish and 

5 carry out a Veteran Treatment Court Program to provide 

6 grants and technical assistance to court systems that— 

7 (1) have adopted a Veterans Treatment Court 

8 Program; or 

9 (2) have filed a notice of intent to establish a 

10 Veterans Treatment Court Program with the Sec11 retary. 

12 (b) PURPOSE.—The purpose of the Veterans Treat13 ment Court Program established under subsection (a) is 

14 to ensure the Department of Justice has a single office 

15 to coordinate the provision of grants, training, and tech16 nical assistance to help State, local, and Tribal govern17 ments to develop and maintain veteran treatment courts. 

18 (c) PROGRAMS INCLUDED.—The Veterans Treatment 

19 Court Program established under subsection (a) shall in20 clude the grant programs relating to veterans treatment 

21 courts carried out by the Attorney General pursuant to 

22 sections 2991 and 3021 of the Omnibus Crime Control 

23 and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (34 U.S.C. 10651, 10701) 

24 or any other provision of law. 
3 

† HR 886 EAS 

1 (d) REGULATIONS.—The Attorney General shall pro2 mulgate regulations to carry out this section. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H.R. 886 

AMENDMENT
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, I, the undersigned Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of Northland Cranberries, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, based on
my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
quarter ended February 28, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ John Swendrowski
------------------------------------
John Swendrowski
April 14, 2003
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FEBRUARY 5, 2014

NO. 03-12-00800-CR

Leeroy Suarez, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND FIELD

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PEMBERTON

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court on November 1, 

2012. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no 

reversible error in the trial court’s judgment of conviction. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial 

court’s judgment of conviction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no 

adjudication of costs is made.
# C_2023063EN.01001202.xml

| 20.2.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.2.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/12

---

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 December 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court — Ireland) — GY v An Bord Pleanála, the Minister for Housing, Local Government and Heritage, Ireland and the Attorney General

(Case C-616/22) (1)

(Aarhus Convention - Access to justice - Requirement for a procedure which is not prohibitively expensive - Scope - Obligation to interpret in accordance with the national procedural law)

(2023/C 63/17)

Language of the case: English

Referring court

High Court (Ireland)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: GY

Defendants: An Bord Pleanála, the Minister for Housing, Local Government and Heritage, Ireland and the Attorney General

Operative part of the order

By Order of 8 December 2022, the President of the Ninth Chamber ordered the removal of Case C-616/22 from the register.

---

(1)  Date lodged: 23.9.2022.

---
No. 12A15 (12-20).

#### Coulter *v.*Kelly, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Application for bail, addressed to Justice Ginsburg and referred to the Court, denied.
The  following  resolution  was adopted by the Human Resources Commitee of the
Company's  Board  of  Directors  on September 26, 1996 with respect to certain
Options  held  by  officers  of  the  Company:

RESOLVED,  that,  effective  September 26, 1996, all Non-Qualified Performance
Stock  Options  granted  September  28,  1995,  be amended to provide that the
exercise  period  for optionees who terminate on or after  September 26, 1996,
shall  be  the  shorter  of five years or the balance of the original ten-year
term  of  the  option remaining, provided that an optionee meets the following
conditions  on  the  date of termination:  (i) optionee is (a) age 55 or older
with  at  least  15  years  of  service,  or  (b)  at  least  age  62,  or (c)
involuntarily  terminated  other  than  for  Cause;  (ii) optionee has not (a)
engaged  in  any  activity  or  conduct  contrary to the best interests of the
Company  or  any  Affiliate, or (b) engaged in competition with the Company or
any  Affiliate;  and  (iii)  in  any fiscal year prior to termination in which
optionee  is  among  the  five highest paid executive officers of the Company,
optionee has refrained from exercising such options if a portion of his or her
compensation  exceeded,  or  would  exceed  if the options were exercised, the
deductibility  limits  of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,
as  amended;  and

FURTHER  RESOLVED,  that, subject to the foregoing terms of the amendment, all
other  terms  of  the  option  award  remain  unchanged;  and

FURTHER  RESOLVED,  that  W. P. Stiritz, and C. S. Sommer be, and each of them
are  hereby  authorized,  to  take  any and all action and execute any and all
documents  they  deem  necessary  or  desirable  to  effectuate  the foregoing
resolution.


i:ex10xxi.doc
# C_2023063EN.01002201.xml

| 20.2.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.2.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/22

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Østre Landsret (Denmark) lodged on 1 December 2022 — Staten og Kommunernes Indkøbsservice A/S v BibMedia A/S

(Case C-737/22)

(2023/C 63/28)

Language of the case: Danish

Referring court

Østre Landsret

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Staten og Kommunernes Indkøbsservice A/S

Defendant: BibMedia A/S

Question referred

Do the principles of transparency and equal treatment in Article 18 of the Public Procurement Directive (1) and the consequent ban on negotiations preclude a tenderer who has submitted the second most economically advantageous tender in connection with an open procedure for separate lots (see Articles 27 and 46 of the Public Procurement Directive) from being given the opportunity, after the deadline for submission of the tender has expired, and in accordance with the predetermined terms in the specifications, to supply the proposed services within a lot under the same terms as a tenderer who has submitted the most economically advantageous tender and who, therefore, is awarded another lot put out to tender at the same time?

---

(1)  Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC (OJ 2014 L 94, p. 65).

---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 48 (Wednesday, March 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 11424]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6118]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP97-1-004]


National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation; Notice of Compliance Filing

March 6, 1997.
    Take notice that on February 28, 1997, National Fuel Gas Supply 
Corporation (National Fuel) tendered for filing tariff sheets to its 
FERC Gas Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1, to be effective April 1, 
1997.
    National Fuel states that the purpose of this filing is to submit 
actual tariff sheets revised to conform to the Commission order issued 
on February 14, 1997 in Docket Nos. RP97-1-002 and -003 and to conform 
with the GISB Standards incorporated by Order No. 587, et al., 
Standards for Business Practices of Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines.
    National Fuel also states that this filing is submitted to comply 
with the Commission's Order No. 587-B, issued on January 30, 1997 in 
Docket No. RM96-1-003 by incorporating by reference into its FERC Gas 
Tariff, the Electronic Delivery Mechanism Standards promulgated Gas 
Industry Standards Board and adopted in Order No. 587-B.
    National Fuel states that it is serving copies of this filing with 
its firm customers, interested state commissions and each person 
designated on the official service list compiled by the Secretary. 
National states that copies are also being served on all interruptible 
customers as of the date of the filing.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rule 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211). All such 
protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the 
Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission 
in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve 
to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public 
inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-6118 Filed 3-11-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket Nos. ER22-379-000; ER22-379-001]

On Wednesday, April 6, 2022, Commission staff will hold a conference call with Southwest Power Pool, Inc. beginning at 3:00 p.m. (Eastern Time). The purpose of the conference call is to clarify the information provided in response to the deficiency letter issued on February 11, 2022 (Deficiency Letter). The discussion during the conference call will be focused principally on the responses to questions 3, 4, 5, and 7 in the Deficiency Letter.

                    All interested parties are invited to listen by phone. The conference call will not be webcasted or transcribed. However, an audio listen-only line will be provided. Those wishing to access the listen-only line must email Thomas Bayly at                     *Thomas.Bayly@ferc.gov*                     by 5:00 p.m. (Eastern Time) on Tuesday, April 5, 2022, with their name, email, and phone number, in order to receive the call-in information before the conference call. Please use the following text for the subject line, “ER22-379-000 listen-only line registration.”                

                    Commission conferences are accessible under section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. For accessibility accommodations, please send an email to                     *accessibility@ferc.gov*                     or call toll free 1 (866) 208-3372 (voice) or (202) 208-1659 (TTY), or send a FAX to (202) 208-2106 with the required accommodations.                

                    For additional information, please contact Thomas Bayly at                     *Thomas.Bayly@ferc.gov.*

Dated: March 30, 2022.

Debbie-Anne A. Reese,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2022-07125 Filed 4-4-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P