alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2022359EN.01008902.xml

| 19.9.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 359/89 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.9.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 359/89

---

Action brought on 22 July 2022 — EIB v Syria

(Case T-467/22)

(2022/C 359/109)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: European Investment Bank (represented by: D. Arts and E. Paredis, lawyers, T. Gilliams, R. Stuart and F. de Borja Oxangoiti Briones, agents)

Defendant: Syrian Arab Republic

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should impose on the Syrian Arab Republic the order:

| — | for payment of all sums due to the applicant under Articles 3.01, 3.02 and 4.01 of the Euphrates Drainage and Irrigation Loan Agreement nr. 80211 (hereafter the ‘Loan Agreement’) since 25 August 2017, comprising:






  — | EUR 1 959 745,31, being the amount due to the applicant as at 30 June 2022, which is all principal of EUR 1 680 510,04, interest of EUR 116 961,48 and contractual default interest (accrued from the due date to 30 June 2022) of EUR 162 273,79. |
| --- | --- | --- |

—

for payment of all sums due to the applicant under Articles 3.01, 3.02 and 4.01 of the Euphrates Drainage and Irrigation Loan Agreement nr. 80211 (hereafter the ‘Loan Agreement’) since 25 August 2017, comprising:

—

EUR 1 959 745,31, being the amount due to the applicant as at 30 June 2022, which is all principal of EUR 1 680 510,04, interest of EUR 116 961,48 and contractual default interest (accrued from the due date to 30 June 2022) of EUR 162 273,79.

| — | further contractual default interest, accruing at the annual rate of 3,5 % (350 basis points), until payment is made. |
| --- | --- |

—

further contractual default interest, accruing at the annual rate of 3,5 % (350 basis points), until payment is made.

| — | for payment of all costs related to the present proceedings pursuant to Article 134(1) of the Rules of Procedure. |
| --- | --- |

—

for payment of all costs related to the present proceedings pursuant to Article 134(1) of the Rules of Procedure.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on one plea in law.

First and only plea in law, alleging that the Syrian Arab Republic is in default of its contractual obligations under Articles 3.01 and 4.01 of the Loan Agreement to make payment of the further instalments under the Loan Agreement as they have fallen due since 25 August 2017, and under Article 3.02 of the Loan Agreement to make payment of default interest on each of the instalments due and not paid, accruing at the annual rate therein. Consequently, the Syrian Arab Republic is contractually obligated to pay all amounts due under Articles 3.01, 3.02 and 4.01 of the Loan Agreement.

---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 49 (Thursday, March 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 11825]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6331]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
[A-570-825]


Sebacic Acid From the People's Republic of China, Extension of 
Time Limit for Antidumping Duty Administrative Review

AGENCY: International Trade Administration/Import Administration/
Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of extension of time limit for Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is extending the 
time limits for its preliminary results in the administrative review of 
the antidumping order on sebacic acid from the Peoples Republic of 
China (China). The review covers the period July 1, 1995, through June 
30, 1996.

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 13, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James Rice or Jean Kemp, AD/CVD 
Enforcement, Group III, International Trade Administration, U.S. 
Department of Commerce, 14th and Constitution Ave. N.W., Washington, 
D.C. 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0162.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Because it is not practicable to 
complete this review within the original time limit, the Department 
is extending the time limit for the completion of the preliminary 
results to July 31, 1997, in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) 
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Uruguay Round 
Agreements Act (URAA). (See Memorandum from Joseph A. Spetrini to 
Robert S. LaRussa on file in the public file of the Central Records 
Unit, Room B-099 of the Department of Commerce).

    This extension is in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the URAA (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)(3)(A)).

    Dated: February 26, 1997.
Joseph A. Spetrini,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, Enforcement Group III.
[FR Doc. 97-6331 Filed 3-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
**Exhibit 32**

 

**Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to**

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**as Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Crescent Capital BDC, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period from February 5, 2015 through December 31, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned officers of the Company, does hereby certify, to the best of such officer’s knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ Jason A. Breaux  |                      |
|----------------------|---------------------------|
| Name:                | Jason A.   Breaux         |   |
| Title:               | Chief   Executive Officer |   |
| Date:                | March 25,   2015     |   |
|                 |                      |
| /s/ Mike L. Wilhelms |                      |
| Name:                | Mike L.   Wilhelms        |   |
| Title:               | Chief   Financial Officer |   |
| Date:                | March 25,   2015     |   |

 

----
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 Certification of Principal Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002/SEC Rule 13a-14(a)
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The Immune Response Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respect the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 a.
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; andc.
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):
 a.
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; andb.
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 Date: August 18, 2006
    
    /s/ Michael K. GreenMichael K. GreenChief Operating Officer andChief Financial Officer
# C_2022244EN.01001701.xml

| 27.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 244/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 244/17

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 23 March 2022 — Research Consorzio Stabile Scarl, acting on its own account and as agent of the association of undertakings to be constituted (Research-Cisa) and Others v Invitalia — Agenzia Nazionale per l’Attrazione degli Investimenti e lo Sviluppo di Impresa and Others

(Case C-215/22)

(2022/C 244/21)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Research Consorzio Stabile Scarl, acting on its own account and as agent of the association of undertakings to be constituted (Research-Cisa); C.I.S.A. SpA, acting on its own account and as agent of the association of undertakings to be constituted (Research-Cisa); Debar Costruzioni SpA, acting on its own account and as agent of the association to be constituted with Consorzio Stabile COM Scarl, C.N. Costruzioni Generali SpA and Edil.Co. Srl; Invitalia — Agenzia Nazionale per l’Attrazione degli Investimenti e lo Sviluppo di Impresa

Defendants: Invitalia — Agenzia Nazionale per l’Attrazione degli Investimenti e lo Sviluppo di Impresa; Debar Costruzioni SpA, acting on its own account and as agent of the association to be constituted with Consorzio Stabile COM Scarl, C.N. Costruzioni Generali SpA and Edil.Co. Srl; Consorzio Stabile Scarl, acting on its own account and as agent of the association of undertakings to be constituted (Research-Cisa); C.I.S.A. SpA, acting on its own account and as agent of the association to be constituted (Research-Cisa)

Question referred

Do Articles 63 and 71 of Directive 2014/24 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014, (1) together with the principles of freedom of establishment and freedom to provide services laid down in Articles 49 and 56 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (FEU Treaty), preclude an interpretation of national Italian law on necessary subcontracting under which a tenderer which does not have the mandatory qualification in one or more secondary sub-categories cannot satisfy the non-fulfilled requirement by having recourse to several subcontracting undertakings or by aggregating the amounts for which those undertakings are qualified?

---

(1)  Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC (OJ 2014 L 94, p. 65).

---
# C_2023261EN.01000202.xml

| 24.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 261/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 261/2

---

Appeal brought on 8 December 2022 by WV against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 5 October 2022 in Case T-618/21, WV v CdT

(Case C-750/22 P)

(2023/C 261/03)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: WV (represented by: L. Levi and A. Champetier, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings: Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union (CdT)

By order of 13 June 2023, the Court of Justice (Sixth Chamber) dismissed the appeal as manifestly unfounded and ordered the appellant to bear his own costs.

---
# C_2022276EN.01001801.xml

| 18.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 276/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 276/18

---

Action brought on 25 May 2022 — AMO Development v EUIPO (Medical instruments)

(Case T-311/22)

(2022/C 276/26)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: AMO Development LLC (Santa Ana, California, United States) (represented by: J. Day, Solicitor, and T. de Haan, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Design: Community designs Nos 2 712 885-0001 and 2 712 885-0002

Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 15 March 2022 in Case R 1433/2021-3

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | set aside the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to bear the costs, including those incurred by the applicant before the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to bear the costs, including those incurred by the applicant before the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 67(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 67(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.

---
##### 



EXHIBIT 10(b)
 RAVEN INDUSTRIES, INC.
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT FOR
SENIOR MANAGEMENT
  WITNESSETH:
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS
 NOW THEREFORE
 Employment
 Term
 Compensation
 Benefits on Termination in Certain Cases
 i.e




---



##### 



Limitation on Amendment or Termination
 Termination For Cause
 Confidentiality
 Non-Competition
 Consequences
of Violation of Confidentiality of Non-Compete Provision
 No Affect on Other Contractual Rights
 Successors to the Corporation
 2




---



##### 



Agreement Binding
 Notice
 If to the Company:
    
    Raven Industries, Inc.P.O. Box 5107Sioux Falls, SD 57117-5107Attention: Ronald M. Moquist, President and CEOIf to Executive:
    
    David R. Bair
  Miscellaneous
 Validity
 Counterparts
 Fees and Expenses
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 RAVEN INDUSTRIES, INC.By:
    /s/ Ronald M. MoquistPresident and Chief Executive Officer EXECUTIVE:/s/ David R. Bair 3
EXHIBIT 12
                                       
                      STATEMENTS RE COMPUTATION OF RATIOS

                   THE QUAKER OATS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
                                       
               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>



(Dollars in Millions)                                              Year Ended
                                                          Dec. 31, 1998   Dec. 31, 1997
                                                        
<S>                                                         <C>            <C> 
Earnings:                                                   
 Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes                          $  396.6       $(1,064.3)
 Add Fixed Charges - net of capitalized interest                82.4            97.0

                                                             
    Earnings                                                $  479.0       $  (967.3)
                                                             
                                                             
Fixed Charges:                                               
 Interest on Indebtedness                                   $   72.0       $    88.3
 Portion of rents representative of the interest factor         12.8            12.7
 Fixed Charges                                              $   84.8       $   101.0
                                                             
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges (a)                          5.65           (9.58)


</TABLE>


(a)  For purposes of computing the ratio of earnings to fixed charges, earnings
represent  pretax income (loss) from continuing operations plus  fixed  charges
(net  of  capitalized  interest).  Fixed charges  represent  interest  (whether
expensed  or  capitalized) and one-third (the portion deemed representative  of
the interest factor) of rents.
# C_2023155EN.01005602.xml

| 2.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/56 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/56

---

Judgment of the General Court of 8 March 2023 — Boshab v Council

(Case T-98/22) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo - Freezing of funds - Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States - Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered - Right to be heard - Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded - Manifest error of assessment - Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures)

(2023/C 155/73)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Évariste Boshab (Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo) (represented by: T. Bontinck, P. De Wolf, A. Guillerme and T. Payan, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: S. Lejeune and B. Driessen, acting as Agents)

Re:

By his action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment, first, of Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/2181 of 9 December 2021 amending Decision 2010/788/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic Republic of the Congo (OJ 2021 L 443, p. 75) and, second, of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2177 of 9 December 2021, implementing Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against persons acting in violation of the arms embargo with regard to the Democratic Republic of the Congo (OJ 2021 L 443, p. 3), in so far as those acts concern him.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Évariste Boshab to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Évariste Boshab to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 148, 4.4.2022.

---
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Provident Bankshares Corporation (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Dennis A. Starliper, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as added
by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Dennis A. StarliperDennis A. StarliperChief Financial Officer


November 9, 2006
# C_2022222EN.01003901.xml

| 7.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 222/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 222/39

---

Action brought on 21 April 2022 — Procter & Gamble v EUIPO (Safeguard)

(Case T-210/22)

(2022/C 222/63)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: The Procter & Gamble Company (Cincinnati, Ohio, United States) (represented by: M. Körner, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark Safeguard — Application for registration No 18 457 075

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 February 2022 in Case R 1753/2021-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) in conjunction with Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) in conjunction with Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---