alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 7 (Friday, January 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1452-1453]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-651]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[ER-FRL-5476-4]


Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information (202) 564-7167 OR (202) 564-7153. Weekly receipt of 
Environmental Impact Statements Filed December 30, 1996 Through January 
03, 1997 Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

EIS No. 960603, Final EIS, FRC, OR, Leaburg-Walterville Hydroelectric 
(FERC. No. 2496) Project, Issuance of New License (Relicense), Funding 
and Land Trust Acquisition, McKenzie River, Lane County, OR, Due: 
February 10, 1997, Contact: Edward R. Meyer (202) 208-7998.
EIS No. 960604, Draft Supplement, NOA, Snapper Grouper Fishery, 
Amendment 8 to the Fishery Mange Plan, Regulatory Impact Review, South 
Atlantic Region, Due: February 24, 1997, Contact: Paula Evans (301) 
713-2341.
EIS No. 970000, Final EIS, FRC, ME, Eel Weir Hydroelectric Project 
(FERC. No. 2984) Implementation, Water Level Management Plan, Sebago 
Lake, Cumberland County, ME, Due: February 10, 1997, Contact: Thomas J. 
LoVullo (202) 219-1168.
EIS No. 970001, Final EIS, AFS, MT, Elk Creek Land Exchange and 
Granting an Easement to Plum Creek, Implementation, Flathead National 
Forest, Swan Lake Ranger District, MT, Due: February 10, 1997, Contact: 
Ken Meckel (406) 892-4372.
EIS No. 970002, Final EIS, NPS, AK, Denali National Park and Reserve, 
``Frontcountry'' Entrance Area and Road Corridor, Development Concept 
Plan, AK, Due: February 10, 1997, Contact: Mike Tranel (907) 683-9552.
EIS No. 970003, Draft EIS, TVA, TN, Columbia Dam Component of the Duck 
River Project, Implementation, Use of Lands Acquired, Possible COE 
Section 404 Permit, Maury County, TN, Due: March 07, 1997, Contact: 
Daniel H. Ferry (423) 632-8876.

Amended Notices

EIS No. 960560, Final EIS, GSA, NY, US Brooklyn Court Project, 
Demolition of the Emanuel Celler Federal Building, Construction of a 
New Courthouse and Renovation/Adaptive Reuse of the General Post Office 
at Cadman Plaza East, Kings County, NY, Due: January 27, 1997, Contact: 
Peter A. Sneed (212) 264-3581. Published FR 12-13-96--Review Period 
extended.


[[Page 1453]]


    Dated: January 7, 1997.
William D. Dickerson,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 97-651 Filed 1-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-U
#### COM. v. KITTLE, C.

1403 MDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/27/2017

CP-40-CR-0002878-2014, CP-40-CR-0004255-2013 (Luzerne)

Affirmed — Application to Withdraw as Counsel Granted
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**828 KA 13-00829**  PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

KENNETH W. HOUGHTON, JR., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

DAVID J. FARRUGIA, PUBLIC DEFENDER, LOCKPORT (MARY-JEAN BOWMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

MICHAEL J. VIOLANTE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, LOCKPORT (LAURA T. BITTNER OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Niagara County Court (Sara S. Farkas, J.), rendered April 24, 2013. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of reckless endangerment in the first degree and attempted assault in the second degree.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of reckless endangerment in the first degree (Penal Law § 120.25) and attempted assault in the second degree (§§ 110.00, 120.05 [3]). Contrary to defendant’s contention, the record establishes that he knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived the right to appeal ( see generally People v Lopez , 6 NY3d 248, 256), and that valid waiver forecloses any challenge by defendant to the severity of the sentence ( see id. at 255; see generally People v Lococo , 92 NY2d 825, 827; People v Hidalgo , 91 NY2d 733, 737).

Entered: July 3, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                                          0000818674
<NAME>                                         INTELLICALL, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1
<CASH>                                                  17
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       21,784
<ALLOWANCES>                                        (4,576)
<INVENTORY>                                          4,730
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     1,029
<PP&E>                                               8,098 
<DEPRECIATION>                                      (6,432)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      32,388 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                8,278
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              1
<COMMON>                                                96
<OTHER-SE>                                          12,050
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        32,388
<SALES>                                              4,262
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     9,881                                 
<CGS>                                                3,512
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        8,782
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     2,363
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        85
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    (393) 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      4,518
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  4,518
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         4,518
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .48 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .37
        


</TABLE>
#### TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant v. SYMANTEC CORPORATION, Cross-Appellant

2016-2551

2016-2554

2016-2630

2016-2631

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 13, 2018

David Isaac Gindler, Irell & Manella LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued for appel*1022lant. Also represented by Michael Richard Fleming, Jason Sheasby, Gavin Snyder, Hong Annita Zhong.

Michael John Sacksteder, Fenwick & West, LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for cross-appellant. Also represented by Dar-gaye Churnet, Brian Michael Hoffman.

(Prost, Mayer and Reyna, Circuit Judges).

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
August 8, 2016

Mr. Stephen Gowdy Gowdy Brothers Aerospace, LLC Consultant for Ed Beck Photography LLC 8170 Old Carriage Court North
Suite 200 Shakopee

, MN 55379

Re: FAA

– 2015

– 4669

Dear Mr. Gowdy :

This letter is to provide notification that we have reviewed your petition for exemption, and have determined that we will continue to process your petition.

As referenced in the June 22, 2016, letter posted to your docket at www.regulations.gov

, we are reviewing pending Section 333 petitions to determine if the recently

- issued regulation, Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 107 ( www.faa.gov/uas ) will satisfy your request

. We have determined that

y our request requires further regulatory relief (Tier 3), and we will continue working on your petition for exemption

.

We have found that your petition, if granted, would set a precedent. Therefore, we will publish a summary of your petition in the Federal Register for public comments , if we have not done so already.

We will advise you of the agency’s final decision on your petition as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding your petition, please contact me at 333exemptions@faa.gov

.

Sincerely,
/s/
Brenda Robeson Program A nalyst
II 

Calendar No. 294 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 887 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 17, 2019 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

NOVEMBER 7, 2019 

Reported by Mr. JOHNSON, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 877 East 1200 South in Orem, Utah, as 

the ‘‘Jerry C. Washburn Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. JERRY C. WASHBURN POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 877 East 1200 South in Orem, 

6 Utah, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Jerry C. 

7 Washburn Post Office Building’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 887 RS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Jerry C. Washburn 

5 Post Office Building’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS

pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 294 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 887 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostOffice Building’’. Orem, Utah, as the ‘‘Jerry C. Washburn Post al Service located at 877 East 1200 South in 

NOVEMBER 7, 2019 

Reported without amendment 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
ARC-12.31.2013-Ex 10.47






Exhibit 10.47


            
March 13, 2014
Mr. Kumarakulasingam “Suri” Suriyakumar
c/o ARC Document Solutions, Inc. 
1981 North Broadway, Suite 385
Walnut Creek, California 94596


Dear Suri:
You have agreed that the Incentive Bonus payable for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 under the Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement between you and American Reprographics Company (“ARC”), entered into on March 21, 2011 (the “Employment Agreement”), shall be $1,516,000, of which thirty percent (30%) shall be paid in cash and 70% in restricted shares of ARC common stock.  Terms not defined in this letter agreement have the meaning ascribed to them in the Employment Agreement. 
Except as expressly amended by this letter agreement, the Employment Agreement will remain in full force and effect. 
Please sign below if the above accurately reflects our agreement on this matter.  


                                                                                                  	
	
	Sincerely,


ARC Document Solutions Inc.

	/s/ DILANTHA WIJESURIYA

	Dilantha Wijesuriya 
Chief Operating Officer






                                                                                       	
	
	 

	Agreed and Accepted:

	 

	/s/ KUMARAKULASINGHAM SURIYAKUMAR

	Kumarakulasingam Suriyakumar
August 8, 2012

No. 12-5585 (12A123).

#### Cook *v.*Ryan, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections.

C. A. 9th Cir. Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to Justice Kennedy, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 47 (Tuesday, March 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 11168]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5927]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP97-266-000]


National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation; Notice of Tariff Filing

March 5, 1997.
    Take notice that on February 28, 1997, National Fuel Gas Supply 
Corporation (National) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1, Twenty-First Revised Sheet No. 5, 
with a proposed effective date of April 1, 1997.
    National states that this filing reflects the quarterly adjustment 
to the reservation component of the EFT rate pursuant to the 
Transportation and Storage Cost Adjustment (TSCA) provision set forth 
in Section 23 of the General Terms and Conditions of National's FERC 
Gas Tariff.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 or 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR Sections 385.211 or 385.214). All such motions or 
protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the 
Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission 
in determining the appropriate action to be taken but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public 
inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-5927 Filed 3-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Errata Note: 2022 EAVS Comprehensive Report and Accompanying Dataset 

December 18, 2023

The state of Wisconsin requested to make corrections to its data submission for the 2022 Policy 

Survey following the initial publication of the comprehensive report and dataset on June 29, 2023. 

These corrections are documented below.

2022 Policy Survey Dataset

The corrections listed below are reflected in Version 1.1 of the 2022 Policy Survey dataset released in

December 2023.

• Wisconsin provided an update to their response to Q36 in the Policy Survey on the auditing 

activities that their state conducted in 2022. Nationwide Q36 data did change. 

Election Administration and Voting Survey: 2020 Comprehensive Report

Section of Report Page Currently Reads Should Read

Election Law and 

Procedure 88

“Nearly all states 

reported conducting logic 

and accuracy testing 

(94.6%)..”

“Nearly all states 

reported conducting logic 

and accuracy testing 

(96.4%)..”

Election Law and 

Procedure 89

Figure 9:

“Logic and accuracy 

testing” bar is 94.6%

“Ballot reconciliation 

audit” bar is 45.5%

“Access audit” bar is 9.1%

“Eligibility audit” bar is 

9.1%

Figure 9:

“Logic and accuracy 

testing” bar is 96.4%

“Ballot reconciliation 

audit” bar is 47.3%

“Access audit” bar is 

10.9%

“Eligibility audit” bar is 

10.9%

Election Law and 

Procedure 131

Wisconsin:

Access Audit: No

Ballot Reconciliation 

Audit: No

Eligibility Audit: No

Wisconsin:

Access Audit: Yes

Ballot Reconciliation 

Audit: Yes

Eligibility Audit: Yes

Election Law and 

Procedure 133 Wisconsin: Wisconsin:
Logic and Accuracy 

Testing: No

Logic and Accuracy 

Testing: Yes

Note: Printed versions of the report will not be adjusted to reflect updates listed in the table.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 44 (Thursday, March 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10305-10306]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5531]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration


Environmental Impact Statement: Douglas County, KS

AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) is issuing this 
notice to advise the public, that our October 17, 1994, Notice of 
Intent to complete a Supplement to the Final Environmental Impact 
Statement is withdrawn.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David R. Geiger, P.E., Division 
Administrator, FHWA 3300 S.W. Topeka Boulevard, Suite 1, Topeka, Kansas 
66611-2237, Telephone: (913) 267-7281.


[[Page 10306]]


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: It was the intent of FHWA to re-evaluate the 
Final Environmental Impact Statement for that portion of the South 
Lawrence Trafficway project from U.S. 59 east to K-10. FHWA wanted to 
consider the effects of the proposed trafficway on the spiritual sites, 
cultural issues, and academic programs at the Haskell Indian Nations 
University. FHWA prepared and circulated a Draft Supplemental 
Environmental Impact Statement and received many comments. FHWA was in 
the process of evaluating these comments when Douglas County and the 
Kansas Department of Transportation decided not to use Federal-aid 
Highway funds for the project. Therefore, FHWA is no longer the lead 
Federal agency for this project and is discontinuing the Supplemental 
Environmental document process.
    The Record of Decision dated June 5, 1990, is now valid only for 
that portion of the Trafficway from the western terminus to U.S. 59.

    Issued on: February 27, 1997.
David R. Geiger,
Division Administrator, Kansas Division, Federal Highway 
Administration, Topeka, Kansas.
[FR Doc. 97-5531 Filed 3-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-M
Silver Dragon Resources Inc.: Exhibit 10.61 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com






Exhibit 10.61




CONSULTING AGREEMENT BETWEEN: 

Manuel Chan (“Consultant”) of 5515 Elizabeth Street,
Vancouver, British Columbia V5Y 3K1 

and 

Silver Dragon Resources Inc. (“Client”) located at 200
Davenport Road, Toronto, Ontario M5R 1J2 

1. The Consultant will provide services to the Client in China
as agreed from time to time. 

2. The Client will pay the Consultant fees at a rate of
US$6,000 per month, upon the rendering of an invoice by the Consultant.

3. This Agreement runs from September 1, 2012 to August 31,
2014, except that either party may terminate this Agreement with six months’
written notice.

4. The Consultant acknowledges that he will acquire information
about certain matters and things which are confidential to the Client. He agrees
that he is prohibited from using or disclosing such confidential information,
directly or indirectly, except with the written permission of the Client. 

5. The Consultant is subject to a restrictive covenant
prohibiting him from consulting for or being associated with a competitor,
soliciting customers or suppliers of the Client or attempting to induce other
employees of the Client to leave during the term of this Agreement and for a
period of 12 months thereafter. 

6. Anything created by the Consultant under this Agreement
including, without limitation, all intellectual property rights in respect of
such items shall be the sole exclusive property of the Client.

7. This Agreement will be governed by the laws of the Province
of Ontario. 

	Manuel Chan 	 	Silver Dragon Resources Inc. 	 
	(Consultant) 	 	(Client) 	 
	  	 	  	 
		 		 
	  	 	Marc Hazout – CEO
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ALL AMERICAN SEMICONDUCTOR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES                                                     EXHIBIT 11.1

STATEMENT RE:  COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS (UNAUDITED)

QUARTERS ENDED MARCH 31                                                            1998                       1997
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<S>                                                                      <C>                       <C>            
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE:

Net Income...................................................            $       518,000           $       302,000
                                                                         ===============           ===============

Weighted Average Shares Outstanding..........................                 19,683,600                19,665,378
                                                                         ===============           ===============

Basic Earnings Per Share.....................................                     $  .03                    $  .02
                                                                                  ======                    ======

DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE:

Net Income...................................................            $       518,000           $       302,000
                                                                         ===============           ===============

Weighted Average and Dilutive Shares:
  Weighted average shares outstanding........................                 19,683,600                19,665,378
  Dilutive shares............................................                    462,469                    32,412
                                                                         ---------------           ---------------
                                                                              20,146,069                19,697,790
                                                                         ===============           ===============

Diluted Earnings Per Share...................................                     $  .03                    $  .02
                                                                                  ======                    ======
</TABLE>
Date 6/28/13 Page of 

POST FOCUS EXPOSURE REPORT 

Summary Page 

Chemical ID: P-13-0378 Reviewer: Cinalli/SS 

Endpoints-Assessed Table 

Reasons for not assessing releases 

Endpoints/Assessment 

Cycles1

Releases 

Assessed 

in 

NCEM2? 

No XB 

Testing 

Required 

No 

Hazard 

Concern 

No 

Releases 

Release 

Below 

Acute 

Threshold5

Release 

Below 

Chronic 

Threshold5

Other 

Ingestion 

 Surface water No NA 

 Ground water (landfill) No NA 

 Consumer Use: DtD2 No NA 

Inhalation 

 Air: incineration (stack) No NA 

 Air: fugitive No NA 

 Consumer Use: CEM3 No NA 

Dermal 

 Consumer Use: CEM No NA X 

Eco 

 Surface water: ADR 

conc and/or PDM4

No NA 

 Consumer Use: DtD No NA X 1

Assessment cycles are endpoint concentrations and dose calculations within the NCEM2 model. 2

Down-the-Drain 

3

Consumer Exposure Model 

4

Probabilistic Dilution Model 

5

The threshold values for assessing endpoints are 1 mg/day for acute doses and 1 mg/year for chronic doses. 

EAB DROP: Release information for this compound does not meet criteria for preparation of an exposure 

assessment in the Exposure Assessment Branch=s (EAB) Initial Review Exposure Report (this report).
EXHIBIT 13.1



CERTIFICATION OF
PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL

OFFICER PURSUANT
TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In connection with
the Annual Report of Nano-Textile Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of Raz Gal and Shlomo Zakai
does certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of his knowledge:



(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|/s/ Raz Gal             | /s/ Shlomo Zakai       
|----------------------- | -----------------------
|Raz Gal                 | Shlomo Zakai           
|Chief Executive Officer | Chief Financial Officer
|                        |                        
|Date: April 28, 2017    | Date: April 28, 2017