alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2021252EN.01003201.xml

| 28.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/32

---

Action brought on 14 May 2021 — Basaglia v Commission

(Case T-257/21)

(2021/C 252/43)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Giorgio Basaglia (Milan, Italy) (represented by: G. Balossi, F. Fimmanò and G. Borriello, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should order the European Commission to pay compensation for the damage suffered by Mr Giorgio Basaglia for the reasons referred to in the application, by way of damages for non-contractual liability, in an amount not lower than EUR 5 013 328,64.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on one plea in law and a chapter concerning the quantification of the damage suffered.

As regards the non-contractual liability in the present case, the applicant remarks that:

| — | by its judgment of 23 September 2020 (Case T-727/19, Basaglia v Commission), the Court annulled the decision of the European Commission rejecting the request for access to documents submitted by the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

by its judgment of 23 September 2020 (Case T-727/19, Basaglia v Commission), the Court annulled the decision of the European Commission rejecting the request for access to documents submitted by the applicant;

| — | that judgment, in particular, confirmed that the Commission’s conduct was unlawful since it had unilaterally restricted the applicant’s right to access the requested documents; |
| --- | --- |

—

that judgment, in particular, confirmed that the Commission’s conduct was unlawful since it had unilaterally restricted the applicant’s right to access the requested documents;

| — | clear damage resulted from that unlawful conduct in the criminal proceedings pending against the applicant and in the proceedings before the Court of Auditors concerning losses to the public purse — since in all three sets of proceedings it was impossible for the applicant to set out his defence in full; and |
| --- | --- |

—

clear damage resulted from that unlawful conduct in the criminal proceedings pending against the applicant and in the proceedings before the Court of Auditors concerning losses to the public purse — since in all three sets of proceedings it was impossible for the applicant to set out his defence in full; and

| — | there is a clear causal link between the misconduct and the alleged damage. |
| --- | --- |

—

there is a clear causal link between the misconduct and the alleged damage.

---
EXHIBIT 23
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 33-51839 and Form S-8 No. 33-56667) pertaining to the Property
Capital Trust 1992 Employee Stock Option Plan and the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 33-56665) pertaining to the Property Capital Trust 1994 Stock
Option Plan for Non-Employee Trustees and the Property Capital Trust Amended and
Restated Deferred Stock Plan for Non-Employee Trustees of Property Capital Trust
of our report dated January 23, 1998, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedules of Property Capital Trust and of our report dated
November 3, 1997, with respect to the financial statements of Property Capital
Midwest Associates, L.P. and of our report dated February 23, 1996, except for
Note 5 as to which the date is April 26, 1996 with respect to the financial
statements of PCA Crossroads Associates, Ltd., and of our report dated October
31, 1997 with respect to the financial statements of PCA Canyon View Associates
Limited Partnership, included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Property
Capital Trust for the year ended December 31, 1997.


                                       ERNST & YOUNG LLP




Boston, Massachusetts
March 25, 1998

                                       83
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                          OF CORPORATE GENERAL PARTNER

            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, James M. Seneff, Jr., the Chief Executive Officer of CNL Realty
Corporation,  the  corporate  general  partner of CNL Income Fund III, Ltd. (the
"Partnership"),  has executed this  certification  in connection with the filing
with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  of the  Partnership's  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  June 30,  2003 (the  "Report").  The
undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



Date:   August 4, 2003                         /s/ James M. Seneff, Jr.
                                               ----------------------------
                                               Name:  James M. Seneff, Jr.
                                               Title: Chief Executive Officer


                                               A signed original of this written
                                               statement required by Section 906
                                               has been  provided  to CNL Income
                                               Fund  III,   Ltd.   and  will  be
                                               retained  by CNL Income Fund III,
                                               Ltd.   and   furnished   to   the
                                               Securities      and      Exchange
                                               Commission   or  its  staff  upon
                                               request.
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23
 
                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



    We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following registration
statements of Lyondell Petrochemical Company, Post-Effective Amendment No. 4 to
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-26867), Registration Statement on
Form S-8 (No. 33-31564), Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-32683),
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-60785) and Registration Statement on
Form S-8 (No. 333-05399) of our report dated February 12, 1997 on our audits of
the consolidated financial statements of Lyondell Petrochemical Company as of
December 31, 1996 and 1995 and for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 1996, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
Houston, Texas
March 17, 1997
Year 2000Total Fluoride by Line Lb F/Ton of Aluminum Produced

L2 L3 L4 L5 L6 A398 Plant Jan-002.21 5.88 1.93 1.63 1.76 1.87 2.68 Feb-002.74 6.24 2.57 1.69 1.84 2.09 3.02 Mar-002.46 6.67 2.40 1.97 1.79 2.07 3.06 Apr-00 1.49 5.80 1.62 1.91 1.67 1.69 2.44 May-001.83 7.28 2.70 2.09 1.64 1.85 3.11 Jun-002.16 8.02 5.72 2.30 1.93 2.13 4.03 Jul-00 1.87 8.48 4.27 1.38 2.22 1.82 3.64 Aug-001.02 8.64 5.84 1.66 1.42 1.37 3.72 Sep-001.56 11.02 5.10 1.80 2.63 2.00 4.42 Oct-00 0.90 8.28 2.52 1.54 1.38 1.27 2.92 Nov-000.74 1.24 1.03 1.25 1.25 1.08 1.10 Dec-000.77 1.03 0.84 0.95 1.22 0.98 0.96

QTR 1 2.47 6.26 2.30 1.76 1.80 2.01 2.92 QTR 2 1.83 7.03 3.35 2.10 1.75 1.89 3.19 QTR 3 1.48 9.38 5.07 1.61 2.09 1.73 3.93 QTR 4 0.80 3.52 1.46 1.25 1.28 1.11 1.66

YR_20001.65 6.55 3.05 1.68 1.73 1.69 2.932.92

3.19

3.93 Lines 2, 5, and 6 under MACT Commission the GTC (B3 and B4) 1.66
# C_2022237EN.01002401.xml

| 20.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 237/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 237/24

---

Appeal brought on 1 January 2022 by José María Castillejo Oriol against the order of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 8 November 2021 in Case T-419/21, Castillejo Oriol v Commission

(Case C-1/22 P)

(2022/C 237/31)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Appellant: José María Castillejo Oriol (represented by: Jover Padró, abogado)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

By order of 2 May 2022, the Court of Justice (Tenth Chamber) dismissed the appeal as being in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded, and ordered the appellant to bear his own costs.

---
EAC Decision on Request for Interpretation 2007-04, 

2005 VVSG Vol. 1 Section 3.1.3 

Date: 

October 29, 2007 

Question: 

Vol. 1 Section 3.1.3 of the 2005 VVSG requires that voting equipment shall be capable of 

presenting the ballot, ballot selections, review screens and instructions in any language 

required by state or Federal law. Clarification is requested on the following: 

• Which parts of the ballot or ballot selections require language translation? 

• Do the requirements apply equally to all languages? 

• Do systems that only support languages that use Roman alphabets need to 

provide translations of candidate names, parties, and office titles? 

Section of Standards or Guidelines: 

Section 3.1.3 of the 2005 VVSG Vol. 1 (Alternative Languages) reads: 

“The voting equipment shall be capable of presenting the ballot, ballot 

selections, review screens and instructions in any language required by 

state or Federal law.” 

Background: 

The above referenced section of the 2005 VVSG is intended to support language 

accessibility requirements under both Federal (Section 301(a)(4) of the Help America 

Vote Act and Section 203 of the Voting Rights Act) and state law. To accomplish this, 

Section 3.1.3 requires that voting equipment have the capability of presenting all ballot 

information necessary for the voter to be able to cast an appropriately informed and 

meaningful ballot in an alternative language. This means a voting system shall be 

capable of providing all information presented to the English-literate voter, including all 

instructions, warnings, contest choices and vote verification information, to an alternative 

language voter when required, regardless of whether the alternative language is written or 

spoken (See Section 3.2.7 (English Proficiency) of Volume 1 of the 2005 VVSG, “(f)or 

voters who lack proficiency in reading English, or whose primary language is unwritten, 
the voting equipment shall provide spoken instructions and ballots in the preferred 

language of the voter, consistent with state and Federal law....”). 

The VVSG does not speak to the issue of alternative language compliance under Federal 

or State law. It sets no requirements as to which ballots require alternative language or 

what portion of the ballot is to be translated. Instead, it speaks to capability. If a voting 

system supports a language, the system must be capable of presenting all ballot 

information in that language. 

Conclusion: 

In conclusion, we interpret Section 3.1.3 of the 2005 VVSG to require voting systems to 

have the capability of providing all ballot information, including all portions of the 

ballot, all instructions, warnings, and vote verification information in the appropriate 

manufacturer supported alternative languages. In addition, we find that Section 3.1.3 

applies equally to all languages, both written and spoken. The VVSG requires only that 

systems be capable of providing alternative language ballots and voting, it sets no 

requirements as to which ballots require alternative language or what portion of the ballot 

is to be translated.
# C_2023261EN.01004801.xml

| 24.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 261/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 261/48

---

Order of the General Court of 9 June 2023 — QZ v EIB

(Case T-569/22) (1)

(2023/C 261/65)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Tenth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 451, 28.11.2022.

---
# C_2023127EN.01003601.xml

| 11.4.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 127/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.4.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 127/36

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 February 2023 — Asesores Comunitarios v Commission

(Case T-77/22) (1)

(Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents relating to the recovery and resilience plan submitted by a Member State to the Commission - Documents originating from a Member State - Refusal to grant access - Exception relating to the financial, monetary or economic policy of the European Union or of a Member State)

(2023/C 127/44)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Asesores Comunitarios, SL (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J. Monrabà Bagan, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Spina, T. Adamopoulos and M. Burón Pérez, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: A. Gavela Llopis and L. Aguilera Ruiz, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the European Commission of 3 December 2021 refusing it access to certain documents originating from the Kingdom of Spain, requested under Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Asesores Comunitarios, SL to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Asesores Comunitarios, SL to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;

| 3. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 138, 28.3.2022.

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The
certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Annual Report of Publix Super Markets, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 29, 2007 (the Report) for the purpose of
complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

I, Charles H. Jenkins, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, that on the date hereof:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                           
|---------------------------
|/s/ Charles H. Jenkins, Jr.
|Charles H. Jenkins, Jr.    
|Chief Executive Officer    
|February 29, 2008
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8985 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8985

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make an exception to the 
 100 shareholder S corporation limitation in the case of shareholders 
whose shares were acquired through certain crowdfunding or small public 
                               offerings.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 16, 2020

 Mr. Hill of Arkansas (for himself and Mr. Schweikert) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make an exception to the 
 100 shareholder S corporation limitation in the case of shareholders 
whose shares were acquired through certain crowdfunding or small public 
                               offerings.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``S Corp Access to Crowdfunding Act''.

SEC. 2. EXCEPTION TO S CORPORATION SHAREHOLDER LIMITATION IN CASE OF 
              CROWDFUNDING AND SMALL PUBLIC OFFERINGS.

    (a) In General.--Section 1361(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(7) Treatment of shares acquired through crowdfunding and 
        small public offerings.--The number of shareholders of the 
        corporation shall be determined under subsection (b)(1)(A) 
        without regard to any individual who has only acquired shares 
        in the corporation through--
                    ``(A) a public offering that meets the terms and 
                conditions set forth in Regulation A promulgated by the 
                Securities and Exchange Commission (17 C.F.R. 230.251 
                et seq.), or
                    ``(B) one or more transactions described in section 
                4(a)(6) of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 
                77d(a)(6)).''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Paul WAGNER IV; Monica Wagner, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. NATIONAL DEFAULT SERVICING CORPORATION; U.S. Bank, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 15-16267

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted February 13, 2018 *

Filed February 27, 2018

Paul Wagner, IV, Pro Se

Monica Wagner, Pro Se

Gregory L. Wilde, Esquire, Tiffany *&*Bosco, P.A., Las Vegas, NV, for Defendant-Appellee National Default Servicing Corporation

Kelly Harrison Dove, Esquire, Attorney, Andrew Martin Jacobs, Esquire, Attorney, Snell & Wilmer, LLP, Las Vegas, NV, for Defendant-Appellee U.S. Bank

Before: LEAVY, FERNANDEZ, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Paul Wagner IV and Monica Wagner appeal pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing their action alleging Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”) claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a district court’s dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). *Cervantes v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.,*656 F.3d 1034, 1040 (9th Cir. 2011). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed the Wagners’- action because the communications at issue do not constitute attempts to collect a debt under the FDCPA. *See Ho v. ReconTrust Co., NA,*858 F.3d 568, 572 (9th Cir. 2017) (“[Ajctions taken to facilitate a non-judicial foreclosure, such as sending the notice of default and notice of sale, are not attempts to collect ‘debt’ as that term is defined by the FDCPA.”); *Dowers v. Nationstar Mortg., LLC,*852 F.3d 964, 970 (9th Cir. 2017) (explaining that “while the FDCPA regulates security *704interest enforcement activity, it does so *only*through Section 1692f(6),” and that “[a]s for the remaining FDCPA provisions, ‘debt collection’ refers only to the collection of a money debt”).

We do not consider matters not properly raised before the district court, or matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued in the opening brief. *See Padgett v. Wright,*587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

We reject as without merit the Wagners’ contentions related to Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., securitization of the loan, NDSC’s joinder in the motion to dismiss, and the Wagners’ entitlement to discovery and a jury trial.

The Wagners’ motion for default judgment (Docket Entry No. 6) is denied.

AFFIRMED.

**

**This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                           5,128
<SECURITIES>                                     1,461
<RECEIVABLES>                                  173,308<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    185,622
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               391,003
<PP&E>                                         109,300
<DEPRECIATION>                                  32,691
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 579,957
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          250,673
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           540
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      95,682
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   579,957
<SALES>                                        523,480
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               523,480
<CGS>                                          455,369
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  455,369
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                83,228
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   877
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,075
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (15,117)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (5,858)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (9,259)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (9,259)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.19)
<FN>
<F1>Net amount shown in interim report.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 23.3

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

    We hereby consent to the use in this Amendment No. 1 to the Registration
Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-103149) of Plains Exploration & Production
Company of our report dated March 10, 2003, relating to the consolidated
financial statements of Plains Exploration and Production Company, which
appears in such Registration Statement. We also consent to the reference to us
under the heading "Experts" in such Registration Statement.


/s/  PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

--------------------------------------
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

Houston, Texas

April 29, 2003
p.1 

OAR Box 1796 

Prepped by Keeia Richards 

Document Number: 

61) VI-B-12 

Docket Number: 

A-90-37 

Printed 10/31/2008 4:20:37 PM Sheet 61 of 107 
P.2 

A-90-37 

VI-B-12 

This document has been moved to IV-C-4 at the request of the project officer. 

It was incorrectly categorize originally.
Inventory Expert Service 

A division of the American Chemical Society Phone: 800-631-1884, 614447-3870 

Fax:614447-3747 

E-mail: answers@cas.org 

Web: www.cas.org/products/client/ 

INVENTORY EXPERT SERVICE REPORT 

IES Order Number: 329943 

D 

Please print the above CA Index Name on the appropriate page of your PMN. 

If this box is checked, CAS has made correctlon(s) marked In red to yoor IES order. 

Please make the same corrections to your PMN before submitting It to the EPA. 

CAS • _ 25'10 Oleoumgy River Road P.O. Box 3343 Columbus, Ohio 4321 O-D334 USA