alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AGREEMENT FOR DEFERRAL OF 1996 ANNUAL CASH BONUS


     Ralston Purina Company ("Company") and            agree   that,   effective
November 1, 1996, $      awarded to Participant under the 1996 Annual Cash Bonus
Award Program shall be  deferred, as requested Participant,  into the option  or
options available  under  the  Deferred  Compensation  Plan  for  Key  Employees
("Plan"), which is attached  hereto as Exhibit A  and incorporated by  reference
herein.

     Pursuant to Participant's request, the following amounts have been deferred
for Participant in the manner set forth below:

     (1)  Equity Option -


          (a)  $         in a Deferred Stock Equivalent Account in Participant's
               name under the Equity Option as  set forth in Section 2.2 of  the
               Plan.

          (b)  $         in a Deferred Stock Equivalent Account in Participant's
               name representing Company Matching Deferral (25% of amount listed
               in 1(a) above) as set forth in Section 2.2b) of the Plan.

     (2)  Short-Term Variable Interest Option - $      in   a   Deferred    Cash

          Account in Participant's  name under the  Variable Interest Option  as
          set forth  in  Section  2.3 of  the  Plan;  provided,  however,  that,
          notwithstanding any provision to the  contrary contained in the  Plan,
          amounts  attributable  to  deferrals  into  the  Short-Term   Variable
          Interest Option shall be paid to Participant in January 1997.
     (3)  Long-Term Variable Interest Option - $            in a  Deferred  Cash

          Account in Participant's  name under the  Variable Interest Option  as
          set forth in Section 2.3 of the Plan.

     Participant's deferral hereunder is pursuant to the Plan and is subject  in
all respects to the terms and conditions of this Agreement and of the Plan.   No
other  communications  or  representations,  written  or  oral,  made  prior  or
subsequent to this Agreement  shall be deemed  to amend or  modify the terms  of
this deferral  except  by  an  agreement in  writing  executed  by  the  parties
subsequent to the date of this Agreement, expressly consenting to such amendment
or modification.   Participant hereby waives  any rights,  and releases  Company
from any claim, based  on any such prior  communications or representations,  if
any.

ACCEPTED:                          RALSTON PURINA COMPANY



     Participant                        C. S. Sommer
                                   Vice President and Director, Administration


     Date
EXHIBIT 23

                  PUBLIC SERVICE ENTERPRISE GROUP INCORPORATED

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
33-44581, 33-44582, 33-45491 and 333-39738 of Public Service Enterprise Group
Incorporated on Form S-8 and Registration Statement Nos. 33-49123 and 333-47714
of Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated on Form S-3 of our report dated
February 16, 2001, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Public
Service Enterprise Group Incorporated for the year ended December 31, 2000.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Parsippany, New Jersey
March 5, 2001



                                      135
GES-2014.2.1-10K-Exh109






Exhibit 10.9





January 28, 2014


Maurice Marciano
c/o Guess?, Inc.
1444 Alameda Street
Los Angeles, California 90021




Re:    Amendment to Consulting Agreement


Dear Maurice:


Reference is made to that certain Consulting Agreement entered into by and between you and Guess?, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), dated June 20, 2011 (the “Consulting Agreement”), and to that certain Assignment and Assumption Agreement entered into by and between you and Maurice Marciano Consulting, a California corporation (the “Assignee”), dated April 16, 2012 (the “Assignment Agreement”), pursuant to which you previously assigned all of your rights, title and interest in and under the Consulting Agreement to the Assignee.  This letter amendment (this “Amendment”) sets forth the agreement by and among you, the Company and the Assignee to amend the Consulting Agreement to extend the “Consulting Period” (as defined in the Consulting Agreement) through January 28, 2015, as set forth below. 
Effective immediately, Section 1 of the Consulting Agreement is hereby amended and restated to read in its entirety as follows:
“1.    Consulting Period.  On the Retirement Date, the Company agrees to retain Marciano as a consultant to provide the services described in Section 2 below from the Retirement Date until the third (3rd) anniversary of the Retirement Date (the “Consulting Period”), as provided in this Consulting Agreement.”
The Consulting Agreement (as modified by the preceding paragraph) and the Assignment Agreement remain in full force and effect.  This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.
[Remainder of page intentionally left blank]



1






You, the Company and the Assignee have caused this Amendment to be duly executed and delivered on the day and year first above written.
  
Guess?, Inc., 
a Delaware corporation
	
		
	/s/ MICHAEL RELICH
	 




By:  Michael Relich
Its:  Chief Operating Officer




Maurice Marciano Consulting, 
a California corporation
	
		
	/s/ MAURICE MARCIANO
	 




By:  Maurice Marciano
Its:  President




Maurice Marciano, 
an individual
	
		
	/s/ MAURICE MARCIANO
	 




Maurice Marciano











2
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****    - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский 

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

        - Student Loans
        - Grants
        - Laws
        - Data

# Persons with Limited English Proficiency

# Persons with Limited English Proficiency

                                    -        ResourcesFrequently Asked QuestionsPolicy Directive to Ensure Access for Individuals with Limited English Proficiency (PDF, 483K)Office for Civil Rights Resources in Other Languages
If you have difficulty understanding English you may request language assistance services for Department information that is available to the public.  These language assistance services are available free of charge.  If you need more information about interpretation or translation services, please call 1-800-USA-LEARN (1-800-872-5327), TTY: (800) 877-8339 TTY / ASCII (American Standard Code For Information Interchange), or email us at: Ed.Language.Assistance@ed.gov. 

Or write to:

U.S. Department of EducationInformation Resource CenterLBJ Education Building400 Maryland Ave., S.W.Washington, DC 20202
             How Do I Find...?    - Student loans, forgiveness
- Higher Education Rulemaking
- College accreditation
- Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
- FERPA
- FAFSA
- 1098, tax forms
- More...
      Information About...    - Elevating Teaching
- Early Learning
- Engage Every Student
- Unlocking Career Success
- Cybersecurity
             
*Our mission* is to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness by fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access.
- Student Loans
- Repaying Loans
- Defaulted Loans
- Loan Forgiveness
- Loan Servicers
- Grants & Programs
- Apply for Pell Grants
- Grants Forecast
- Apply for a Grant
- Laws & Guidance
- Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
- FERPA
- Civil Rights
- IDEA Website
- Data & Research
- Education Statistics
- Postsecondary Education Data
- ED Data Express
- Nation's Report Card
- What Works Clearinghouse
- Open Data Platform
- COVID Relief Data
- About Us
- Contact Us
- ED Offices
- Jobs
- Press Releases
- FAQs
- Recursos en español
- Budget, Performance
- Privacy Program
- Homeroom Blog
- Notices
- FOIA
- Privacy Policy
- Accessibility
- Security
- Information Quality
- Inspector General
- Whitehouse.gov
- USA.gov
- Benefits.gov
- Regulations.gov
No. 11-10661.

#### Cox *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1995
<CASH>                                         474,621
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,579,407
<ALLOWANCES>                                    20,259
<INVENTORY>                                  2,314,258
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,631,948
<PP&E>                                       2,421,368
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,996,807
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,514,353
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,760,063
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        43,541
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,441,973
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,514,353
<SALES>                                     10,682,280
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,061,299
<CGS>                                        7,906,567
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,631,282
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,210,013
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,042
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                204,872
<INCOME-TAX>                                   104,572
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            100,300
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   100,300
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       .0
        

</TABLE>
# C_2023045EN.01000502.xml

| 6.2.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 45/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.2.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 45/5

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék (Hungary) lodged on 18 October 2022 — J. P. Mali Kerékpárgyártó és Forgalmazó Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága

(Case C-653/22)

(2023/C 45/10)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Fővárosi Törvényszék

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: J. P. Mali Kerékpárgyártó és Forgalmazó Kft.

Defendant: Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága

Question referred

Must Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 October 2013 laying down the Union Customs Code (‘the Customs Code’) (1) be interpreted as meaning that the requirement of proportionality laid down in Article 42(1) thereof is satisfied by Article 84(8) of the az uniós vámjog végrehajtásáról szóló 2017. évi CLII. törvény (Law CLII of 2017 on the application of EU customs law; ‘the Law on customs’) which, in the case of the customs administrative fine which has to be imposed where a customs deficit has been incurred as a result of an offence relating to the correctness of information in the customs declaration, does not allow the customs authorities to assess all the circumstances of the case or the conduct attributable to the trader who lodged the customs declaration, but requires, as a mandatory rule, the imposition of a customs administrative fine equal to 50 % of the established customs deficit, irrespective of the seriousness of the offence committed and the examination and assessment of the liability attributable to that trader?

---

(1)  OJ 2013 L 269, p. 1.

---
# C_2021349EN.01004101.xml

| 30.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 349/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 349/41

---

Action brought on 5 July 2021 — DZ Bank v SRB

(Case T-390/21)

(2021/C 349/56)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: DZ Bank AG Deutsche Zentral-Genossenschaftsbank, Frankfurt am Main (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: H. Berger and M. Weber, lawyers)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board (SRB)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the Single Resolution Board of 14 April 2021 on the calculation of the 2021 ex ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRB/ES/2021/22), including the annexes thereto, in so far as the contested decision, including Annex I, Annex II and Annex III thereto, concerns the applicant’s contribution; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Single Resolution Board of 14 April 2021 on the calculation of the 2021 ex ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRB/ES/2021/22), including the annexes thereto, in so far as the contested decision, including Annex I, Annex II and Annex III thereto, concerns the applicant’s contribution;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

In the alternative, in the event that the Court takes the view that the contested decision is legally non-existent as a result of the use of the incorrect official language by the defendant and the action for annulment would therefore be inadmissible on the ground that it would be devoid of purpose, the applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare that the contested decision is legally non-existent in so far as it concerns the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that the contested decision is legally non-existent in so far as it concerns the applicant;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on 10 pleas in law, which are in essence identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-389/21, Landesbank Baden-Württemberg v SRB.

---
# C_2022284EN.01005901.xml

| 25.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 284/59 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 284/59

---

Action brought on 10 June 2022 — Hacker-Pschorr Bräu v EUIPO — Vandělíková (HACKER SPACE)

(Case T-349/22)

(2022/C 284/80)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Hacker-Pschorr Bräu GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by: C. Tenkhoff and T. Herzog, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Jana Vandělíková (Prague, Czech Republic)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark HACKER SPACE — Application for registration No 18 144 157

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 1 April 2022 in Case R 1268/2021-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 47(5) and Article 46 in conjunction with Article 8(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 47(5) and Article 46 in conjunction with Article 8(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament;

| — | Infringement of Articles 2(c) and 7(1) of Commission delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Articles 2(c) and 7(1) of Commission delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625;

| — | Infringement of the principle of equal treatment and sound administration, including the principle of procedural economy, Article 41(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of the principle of equal treatment and sound administration, including the principle of procedural economy, Article 41(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.

---
File :C:\DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\WELLMAAD.DUPONTNET\DESKTOP\BISSETT 

... SPECTRA\05022012\05022012-18.D 

Operator : 

Instrument : GCMSD1 

Acquired : 3 May 2012 00:53 using AcqMethod FP_PREC30 

Sample Name: TLF-11192-E117066-77B-1 

Misc Info : 2012-1015 

4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 16.00 18.00 20.00 22.00 24.00 26.00 

2000 

4000 

6000 

8000 

10000 

12000 

14000 

16000 

18000 

20000 

22000 

24000 

26000 

28000 

30000 

32000 

34000 

36000 

38000 

40000 

42000 

44000 

46000 

48000 

50000 

52000 

54000 

56000 

58000 

60000 

62000

Time-->

Abundance TIC: 05022012-18.D 

C10 Telomer-B Iodide

C8 Telomer-B Alcohol

C8 Olefin

C6 Telomer-B Alcohol
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8697 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8697

  To direct the Director of National Intelligence to submit to State 
election officials and Congress annual reports on pre-election threats 
               for general elections for Federal office.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 27, 2020

Miss Rice of New York introduced the following bill; which was referred 
           to the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To direct the Director of National Intelligence to submit to State 
election officials and Congress annual reports on pre-election threats 
               for general elections for Federal office.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Election Security Assessments Act''.

SEC. 2. ANNUAL REPORTS ON PRE-ELECTION THREATS.

    Not later than January 30, 2020, and annually thereafter, the 
Director of National Intelligence shall submit an assessment of the 
full scope of threats to election infrastructure, including 
cybersecurity threats posed by State actors and terrorist groups, and 
recommendations to address or mitigate the threats, as developed by the 
Secretary and Chairman, to--
            (1) the chief State election official of each State;
            (2) the Committees on Homeland Security and House 
        Administration of the House of Representatives and the 
        Committees on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs and 
        Rules and Administration of the Senate; and
            (3) any other appropriate congressional committees.
                                 <all>
```
03/02/201 0 11:3 G FAX 202483514 2 FA A+ DMS 0002/00 3 ,... , .^,4-, v, . jv . rn Ao^ r£3 0 r^a o 1-ftf t Kt U UOUNS L AGL

T12002/00 3

U.S . DEPARTMENT O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC E O PREARINe S WASHINGTON , D.C . I N TH EMATTE

RO F KYL EGUTCHE S FA A DOCKE

T NO . (not . assigned ) (Civi l Penalt y Action ) DM S NO . (no t

assigned ) FA A CAS ENO . 2009-GL-23-010 5
WITHDRAWA

LO FCOMPLAIN T Th e Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n (FAA) , b y counsel , hereb y withdraw s it s Complaint , pursuan t t o asettlemen t

agreemen t

betwee n t h e parties . Respectfull y submitte dthi s 22' ^ da y o f February , 2010 . • O

C 3

MicKae l P . McKinle y' ' Senio r Attorne y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n Grea t Lake s Region , AGL- 7 230 0 Eas t Devo n Avenu e De s Plaines , I L 6001 8 847.294.810 9 FAX : 847.294.749 8,-* * + nM< ; 01003/00 3 03/02/201 0 11:3 G FA X 202493514 2 FA AL)M 6 ^^^..^^ ^ V/////<:u,^ . ,,.:. u r/^ Ay<t f Zd * /4S yFAARE G COUNS L AGL 7 @100d/00 3



### I hereb y certif y tha t th e foregoin g Withdrawa l o f Complain t

ha s bee n maile dthi s dat e b y Facsimil e an dRegula r Mail , to ; On e Copy ;

One Copy ; Hearin g Docke t Attn : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n Milbe r Wrigh t Building , Suit e 2W1000 eo o Independenc e Avenue , S . W . Washington , D

C 2059 1 ?AX : (202 ) 493-514 2 Kyl e Gutche s 503 0 S W eS'* " Terrac e For t Lauderdale , F L 3332 8 Date d thi s 22"" ^ da yo f February , 2010 . Mii^ae l F . McKinley/ Michae l F . McKinley Senio r Attorney
##### 



EXHIBIT 23.1 Independent Auditors Consent The Board of Trustees
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust: We consent to incorporation by reference in registration statements No.
333-89164 (Form S-3), of Archstone-Smith Operating Trust and subsidiaries of
our reports dated February 9, 2004, relating to the consolidated balance sheets
of Archstone-Smith Operating Trust and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and
2002, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, unitholders equity, other common unitholders interest and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2003, and the related schedule, which
reports appear in the December 31, 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust. Our report refers to the adoption of
FASB Interpretation No. 46 Consolidation of Variable Interest
Entities (revised), effective July 1, 2003. KPMG LLP Denver, Colorado
March 5, 2004
EX-10.37





 Exhibit 10.37 

[Caribou Biosciences, Inc. Letterhead] 

Confidential 
 June 14, 2019 

Barbara McClung 
 2901 Shasta Road 

Berkeley, CA 94708 
 Dear Barbara: 

In light of your contributions to the Company over the past year, the Board of Directors has approved an increase in your base salary to $365,000 effective
July 1, 2019. Your new target bonus will be 35% effective for the 2019 bonus payment. 
 Thank you for your strategic leadership and continued service
to Caribou. I look forward to tackling further challenges of our growing company with you. 
  

	
	Regards,
	
	 /s/ Rachel E. Haurwitz

	
	Rachel E. Haurwitz, Ph. D.
	President and CEO
Hennion & Walsh, Inc. S-6/A


Exhibit 4.3


 



 


 


Consent of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm


We have issued our report
dated July 2, 2021, with respect to the financial statement of SmartTrust 522 contained in Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement
on Form S-6 (File No. 333-255334) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in the Registration Statement
and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm”.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


July 2, 2021
# C_2023045EN.01000402.xml

| 6.2.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 45/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.2.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 45/4

---

Appeal brought on 22 June 2022 by Group Nivelles against the judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 27 April 2022 in Case T-327/20, Group Nivelles v EUIPO

(Case C-419/22 P)

(2023/C 45/07)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Appellant: Group Nivelles NV (represented by: J.A.M. Jonkhout, advocaat)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), Easy Sanitary Solutions BV

By order of 16 December 2022, the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) decided that the appeal should not be allowed to proceed and ordered Group Nivelles NV to bear its own costs.

---