Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 45 / Friday, March 7, 1997 / Notices 10559

1997 Through February 28, 1997

Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

EIS No. 970065, Draft EIS, BLM, CA,

Interlakes Special Recreation

Management Area Plan,

Implementation, Federal and Private

Lands Issues, Shasta County, CA, Due:

April 21, 1997, Contact: Eric A.

Morgan (916) 224–2100.

EIS No. 970066, Draft EIS, FHW, GA,

Harry S. Truman Parkway,

Construction from the Abercorn Street

Extension (GA–204) to Derenne

Avenue, COE Section 404 Permit and

U.S. Coast Guard Permit, Chatham

County, GA, Due: April 21, 1997,

Contact: Larry R. Dreihaup (404) 562–

3630.

EIS No. 970067, Draft Supplement,

BLM, MT, SD, ND, Standards for

Rangeland Health and Guidelines for

Livestock Grazing Management on

Bureau of Land Management

Administered Lands, Implementation,

MT, ND and SD, Due: May 03, 1997,

Contact: Sandy Brooks (406) 255–

2929.

EIS No. 970068, Draft EIS, GSA, CO,

Denver Federal Center Master Site

Plan, Implementation, City of

Lakewood, Jefferson County, CO, Due:

April 28, 1997, Contact: Lisa

Morpurgo (303) 236–7131.

EIS No. 970069, Final EIS, BLM, NV,

Denton-Rawhide Mine Expansion

Project, Plan of Operation Approval,

Implementation, Minerial County,

NV, Due: April 07, 1997, Contact:

Terri Knutson (702) 885–6156.

EIS No. 970070, Draft EIS, AFS, NH,

Waterville Valley Ski Resort Project,

Development of Snowmaking Water

Impoundments Project, Special-UsePermits, Dredge and Fill Permit and

COE Section 404 Permit, White

Mountain National Forest,

Pemigewasset Ranger District, Town

of Waterville Valley, Grafton County,

NH, Due: April 21, 1997, Contact:

Jerome E. Perez (802) 767–4261.

EIS No. 970071, Draft EIS, USA, CA,

Fleet and Industrial Supply Center/

Vision 2000 Maritime Development,

Disposal and Reuse, Funding, NPDES

Permit, COE Section 10 and 404

Permits, City of Oakland, Alameda

County, CA, Due: April 21, 1997,

Contact: Gary J. Munekawa (415) 244–

3022.

EIS No. 970072, Final EIS, BLM, NM,

Roswell Resource Area Management

Plan and Carlsbad Resource Area

Management Plan Amendment,

Implementation, Quay, Curry,

DeBaca, Roosevelt, Lincoln,

Guadalupe, Chaves, Eddy, and Lea

Counties, NM, Due: April 07, 1997,

Contact: David Stout (505) 627–0272.

EIS No. 970073, Draft EIS, AFS, AK,

Chasina Timber Sale, Harvesting

Timber and Road Construction,

Tongass National Forest, Craig Ranger

District, Ketchikan Administrative

Area, AK, Due: April 25, 1997,

Contact: Norm Matson (907) 228–

6273.

EIS No. 970074, Final EIS, DOE, NV,

CA, Sierra Nevada Region 2004 Power

Marketing Program, Implementation,

1,480 megawatts (MW) Power from

the Central Valley and Washoe

Project, NV and CA, Due: April 07,

1997, Contact: Jerry Toenyes (916)

353–4418.

Dated: March 4, 1997.

William D. Dickerson,

Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office

of Federal Activities.

[FR Doc. 97–5703 Filed 3–6–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–U

[ER–FRL–5478–2]

Environmental Impact Statements and

Regulations; Availability of EPA

Comments

Availability of EPA comments

prepared February 17, 1997 Through

February 21, 1997 pursuant to the

Environmental Review Process (ERP),

under Section 309 of the Clean Air Act

and Section 102(2)(c) of the National

Environmental Policy Act as amended.

Requests for copies of EPA comments

can be directed to the Office of Federal

Activities at (202) 564–7167. An

explanation of the ratings assigned to

draft environmental impact statements

(EISs) was published in FR dated April

5, 1996 (61 FR 15251).

Draft EISs

ERP No. D–FHW–G40144–AR Rating

LO, US 71 Relocation, Construction

extending from US 70 in DeQueen to I–

40 near Alma, AR, Funding and COE

Section 404 Permit, Sevier, Polk, Scott,

Sebastian and Crawford Counties, AR.

Summary: EPA had no objection to

the selection of the preferred alternative

described in the draft EIS. ERP No. D–

FHW–G50008–00 Rating LO, Great

River Bridge, Construction, US 65 in

Arkansas to MS–8 in Mississippi,

Funding, COE Section 404 Permit and

US Coast Guard Bridge Permit, Desha

and Arkansas Counties, AR and Bolivar

County, MS.

Summary: EPA had no objection to

the proposed bridged river crossing.

EPA supports the selection of an

alternative alignment south of Big Island

as the preferred route.

ERP No. D–NPS–K65194–AS Rating

LO, National Park of American Samoa,

Implementation, General Management

Plan, Islands of Tutulla, Ta’u and Ofu,

Territory of American Samoa.

Summary: EPA had no objection to

the action, however additional

clarification was requested to be

included in the final EIS.

Dated: March 4, 1997.

William D. Dickerson,

Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office

of Federal Activities.

[FR Doc. 97–5704 Filed 3–6–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–U

[FRL–5699–9]

Meeting To Create a Successor

Organization to the Grand Canyon

Visibility Transport Commission

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

SUMMARY: The United States

Environmental Protection Agency (U.S.

EPA) is announcing an organizational

meeting of the successor organization to

the Grand Canyon Visibility Transport

Commission (Commission). The meeting

will be held on March 12–13, 1997 at

the Atlantis Hotel, 3800 South Virginia

Street, Reno, Nevada. The meeting will

begin at 9:00 am on the 12th and end

at noon on the 13th.

The Commission made

recommendations to EPA per Section

169B of the Clean Air Act in June, 1996.

At that time the Commission

determined that a successor

organization was necessary to track and

coordinate the implementation of its

recommendations. Subsequently the

Commission approved, by mail ballot,

the membership and general

characteristics of such an organization.

At the meeting in Reno, the new

organization will adopt by-laws

governing its goals, principles and

operating procedures. Whereas the

principal function of the organization

will be to foster the implementation of

the Grand Canyon Visibility Transport

Commission’s recommendations, it will

also consider additional functions

relating to air quality in the western

United States.

The Commission was established by

U.S. EPA on November 13, 1991 (see 56

FR 57522, November 12, 1991). All

meetings are open to the public. These

meetings are not subject to the

provisions of the Federal Advisory

Committee Act, Pub. L. 92–463, as

amended.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. John T. Leary, Project Manager for

the Grand Canyon Visibility Transport
10560 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 45 / Friday, March 7, 1997 / Notices

Commission, Western Governors’

Association, 600 17th Street, Suite 1705,

South Tower, Denver, Colorado 80202;

telephone number (303) 623–9378;

facsimile machine number (303) 534–

7309; e-mail, jleary@westgov.org.

Dated: February 28, 1997.

John Wise,

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 9.

[FR Doc. 97–5623 Filed 3–6–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

COMMISSION

Public Information Collection

Requirements Submitted to Office of

Management and Budget (OMB) for

Review

February 28, 1997.

The Federal Communications

Commission has submitted the

following information collection

requirements to OMB for review and

clearance under the Paperwork

Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C.

Section 3507. Persons wishing to

comment on the following collections

should contact Timothy Fain, Office of

Management and Budget, Room 10236,

NEOB, Washington, D.C. 20503, (202)

395–0651. For further information,

contact Dorothy Conway, Federal

Communications Commission, (202)

418–0217.

Please note: The Commission has

requested emergency review of these

Automated Reporting Management

Information System (‘‘ARMIS’’)

collections by March 7, 1997, under the

provisions of 5 CFR 1320.13.

Title: The ARMIS Annual Summary

Report (formerly titled, ‘‘The ARMIS

Quarterly Report’’).

Form No.: FCC Report 43–01.

OMB Control No.: 3060–0512.

Action: Revised Collection.

Respondents: Businesses or other for

profit entities.

Estimated Annual Burden: 150

respondents; 220 hours per response

(avg.); 33,000 total annual burden hours.

Needs and Uses: ARMIS was

implemented to facilitate the timely and

efficient analysis of revenue

requirements and rate of return, to

provide an improved basis for audits

and other oversight functions, and to

enhance the Commission’s ability to

quantify the effects of alternative policy.

The ARMIS Annual Summary Report

contains financial and operating data

and is used to monitor the local

exchange carrier industry and to

perform routine analyses of costs and

revenues on behalf of the Commission.

It is one of ten reports.

Title: The ARMIS Customer Satisfaction

Report (formerly titled ‘‘The ARMIS

Semi-Annual Service Quality

Report’’).

Form No.: FCC Report 43–06.

OMB Control No.: None.

Action: New Collection.

Respondents: Businesses or other for

profit entities.

Estimated Annual Burden: 8

respondents; 900 hours per response

(avg.); 7,200 total annual burden hours.

Needs and Uses: The Customer

Satisfaction Report, formerly the SemiAnnual Quality Report, is based on

telephone surveys indicating a

percentage of satisfied customers, and is

collected by the carriers from residential

and business customers.

Title: The ARMIS Operating Data

Report.

Form No.: FCC Report 43–08.

OMB Control No.: 3060–0496.

Action: Revised Collection.

Respondents: Businesses or other for

profit entities.

Estimated Annual Burden: 50

respondents; 160 hours per response

(avg.); 8,000 total annual burden hours.

Needs and Uses: The ARMIS

Operating Data Report consists of

statistical schedules previously

contained in FCC Form M which are

needed by the Commission to monitor

network growth, usage, and reliability.

Federal Communications Commission.

William F. Caton,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97–5654 Filed 3–6–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712–01–F

Public Information Collections

Approved by Office of Management

and Budget

February 28, 1997.

The Federal Communications

Commission (FCC) has received Office

of Management and Budget (OMB)

approval for the following public

information collections pursuant to the

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,

Public Law 104–13. An agency may not

conduct or sponsor and a person is not

required to respond to a collection of

information unless it displays a

currently valid control number. For

further information contact Shoko B.

Hair, Federal Communications

Commission, (202) 418–1379.

Federal Communications Commission.

OMB Control No.: 3060–0730.

Expiration Date: 02/28/2000.

Title: Toll Free Service Access Codes,

800/888 Number Release Procedures.

Form No.: N/A .

Estimated Annual Burden: 18,660

total annual hours; 1 hour per

respondent (avg.); 18,660 respondents.

Estimated Annual Reporting and

Recordkeeping Cost Burden: $0.

Description: The Commission has

instructed Database Service

Management, Inc. (DSMI) to collect

authorization from the current 800

number subscriber and its Responsible

Organization or the Toll Free Service

Provider declining interim protection

for the corresponding 888 number. In

order to protect the interests of the

involved parties, DSMI will not release

the 888 number from the pool of

unavailable numbers into the general

pool of toll free numbers until it

receives these authorizations.

OMB Control No.: 3060–0514.

Expiration Date: 02/28/2000.

Title: Holding Company Annual

Report––Section 43.21(c).

Form No.: N/A.

Estimated Annual Burden: 20 total

annual hours; 1 hour per respondent; 20

respondents.

Estimated Annual Reporting and

Recordkeeping Cost Burden: $0.

Description: Filing of SEC Form 10–K

is required by Sections 1.785 and

43.31(c) of the FCC Rules and

authorized by Section 219 of the

Communications Act of 1934, as

amended. Filing of the form is required.

Each company, not itself a

communication common carrier, that

directly or indirectly controls any

communication common carrier having

annual revenues of $100 million or

more must file annually with the

Commission, no later than the date

prescribed by SEC for its purposes two

complete copies of any Form 10–K

annual report. The information filed

pursuant to Section 43.21(c) is used by

staff members to regulate and monitor

the telephone industry and by the

public to analyze the industry. Selected

information is compiled and published

in the Commission’s annual common

carrier statistical publication.

OMB Control No.: 3060–0478.

Expiration Date: 06/30/97.

Title: Informational Tariffs.

Form No.: N/A.

Estimated Annual Burden: 16,500

total annual hours; 50 hours per

respondent (avg.); 330 respondents.

Estimated Annual Reporting and

Recordkeeping Cost Burden: $0.

Description: Providers of interstate

operator services are directed by Section

226(h)(1)(A) of the Communications Act

of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. Section

226(h)(1)(A), to file informational tariffs

with the Commission and to update

these tariffs regularly. The informational