10524 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 45 / Friday, March 7, 1997 / Notices

Contact: Amy Wei at (202) 482–1131

Dated: February 26, 1997.

Richard W. Moreland,

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for

AD/CVD Enforcement.

[FR Doc. 97–5628 Filed 3–6–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

Determination Not To Revoke

Antidumping Duty Orders and

Findings Nor To Terminate Suspended

Investigations

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Determination not to revoke

antidumping duty orders and findings

nor to terminate suspended

investigations.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce

is notifying the public of its

determination not to revoke the

antidumping duty orders and findings

nor to terminate the suspended

investigations listed below.

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 7, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Michael Panfeld or the analyst listed

under Antidumping Proceeding at:

Import Administration, International

Trade Administration, U.S. Department

of Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution

Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20230.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The

Department of Commerce (the

Department) may revoke an

antidumping duty order or finding or

terminate a suspended investigation,

pursuant to 19 CFR § 353.25(d)(4)(iii), if

no interested party has requested an

administrative review for four

consecutive annual anniversary months

and no domestic interested party objects

to the revocation or requests an

administrative review.

We had not received a request to

conduct an administrative review for

the most recent four consecutive annual

anniversary months. Therefore,

pursuant to § 353.25(d)(4)(i) of the

Department’s regulations on January 6,

1997, we published in the Federal

Register a notice of intent to revoke

these antidumping duty orders and

findings and to terminate the suspended

investigations and served written notice

of the intent to each domestic interested

party on the Department’s service list in

each case. Within the specified time

frame, we received objections from

domestic interested parties to our intent

to revoke these antidumping duty orders

and findings and to terminate the

suspended investigations. Therefore,

because domestic interested parties

objected to our intent to revoke or

terminate, we no longer intend to revoke

these antidumping duty orders and

findings or to terminate the suspended

investigations.

Antidumping Proceeding

A–351–603

Brazil

Brass Sheet and Strip

Objection Date: January 6, 1997

Objector: Copper & Brass Fabricators

Council, Inc.

Contact: Tom Killiam at (202) 482–

2704

A–122–605

Canada

Color Picture Tubes

Objection Date: January 31, 1997

Objector: AFL-CIO et al

Contact: Valerie Owenby at (202)

482–0145

A–559–601

Singapore

Color Picture Tubes

Objection Date: January 31, 1997

Objector: AFL-CIO et al

Contact: Michael Heaney at (202)

482–4475

A–791–502

South Africa

Brazing Copper Wire and Rod

Objection Date: January 6, 1997

Objector: Copper & Brass Fabricators

Council, Inc.

Contact: Valerie Owenby at (202)

482–0145

A–580–603

South Korea

Brass Sheet and Strip

Objection Date: January 6, 1997

Objector: Copper & Brass Fabricators

Council, Inc.

Contact: Tom Killiam at (202) 482–

2704

A–580–605

South Korea

Color Picture Tubes

Objection Date: January 17, 1997;

January 31, 1997

Objector: Thompson Consumer

Electronics, AFL-CIO et al

Contact: Tamara Underwood at (202)

482–0197

A–583–603

Taiwan

Stainless Steel Cooking Ware

Objection Date: January 9, 1997;

January 14, 1997; January 16, 1997

Objector: Regal Ware, Inc., Revere

Ware Corporation; Fair Trade

Committee of the Cookware

Manufacturers Association

Contact: Valerie Owenby at (202)

482–0145

A–122–701

Canada

Potassium Chloride

Objection Date: January 21, 1997;

January 30, 1997

Objector: Agrium (US), Inc.,

Mississippi Potash, Inc.

Contact: James Rice at (202) 482–1374

Dated: February 26, 1997.

Richard W. Moreland,

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for AD/

CVD Enforcement.

[FR Doc. 97–5629 Filed 3–6–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

[A–421–805]

Aramid Fiber Formed of Poly ParaPhenylene Terephthalamide (PPD–T)

From the Netherlands; Preliminary

Results of Antidumping Administrative

Review

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of preliminary results of

the antidumping duty administrative

review; Aramid fiber formed of poly

para-phenylene terephthalamide from

The Netherlands.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce

(the Department) is conducting an

administrative review of the

antidumping duty order on aramid fiber

formed of poly para-phenylene

terephthalamide (PPD–T aramid) from

the Netherlands in response to requests

by respondent, Akzo Nobel Aramid

Products, Inc. and Aramid Products

V.o.F. (Akzo) and petitioner, E.I. du

Pont de Nemours and Company. This

review covers sales of this merchandise

to the United States during the period

June 1, 1995 through May 31, 1996, by

Akzo Nobel V.o.F. The results of the

review indicate the existence of

dumping margins for the above period.

We invite interested parties to

comment on these preliminary results.

Parties who submit arguments are

requested to submit with the argument

(1) a statement of the issue and (2) a

brief summary of the argument.

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 7, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Nithya Nagarajan at (202) 482–0193,

Eugenia Chu at (202) 482–3964, or Ellen

Knebel at (202) 482–1398, Import

Administration, International Trade

Administration, U.S. Department of

Commerce, Room 7866, 14th Street and

Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington

D.C. 20230.

Applicable Statute and Regulations

Unless otherwise indicated, all

citations to the statute are references to

the provisions effective January 1, 1995,