alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            31,927
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                           16,999
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                             17,036
<EQUITIES>                                       9,846
<MORTGAGE>                                         110
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                  68,790
<CASH>                                             415
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                               2,949
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           4,943
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 126,334
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 33,741
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             31,769
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                            1,891
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                  7,529
<COMMON>                                            42
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<OTHER-SE>                                      48,072
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   126,334
<PREMIUMS>                                      42,799
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              2,294
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               1,041
<OTHER-INCOME>                                     528
<BENEFITS>                                      22,814
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      5,295
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             5,743
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,387
<INCOME-TAX>                                       554
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,833
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .58
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                  14,207
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                             23,273
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                1,217
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                              12,522
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                 7,206
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                 33,481
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### Ilich VARGAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John MCMAHON, San Bernardino County Sheriff, in his individual and official capacities; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 16-55816

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 13, 2018 *

Filed March 14, 2018

Ilich Vargas, Pro Se

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, and TROTT and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Pretrial detainee Ilich Vargas appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional claims arising from his pending state criminal proceedings and his custody in San Bernardino County’s West Valley Detention Center. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion. *O’Loughlin v. Doe,*920 F.2d 614, 616 (9th Cir. 1990). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Vargas’s motion to pro*814ceed IFP because Vargas failed to allege facts in his proposed complaint sufficient to state a claim. *See id.*at 616-17 (district court may deny leave to proceed IFP “ ‘at the outset if it appears from the face of the proposed complaint that the action is frivolous or without merit’ ”) (quoting *Tripati v. First Nat’l Bank & Trust,*821 F.2d 1368, 1370 (9th Cir. 1987)).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
# Euroopa Liidu C 114A/28.

| | ISSN 1977-0898 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopa Liidu
  Teataja | C 114A |
| | |
| Eestikeelne väljaanne | Teave ja teatised | 61. aastakäik28. märts 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0898

Euroopa Liidu

Teataja

C 114A

Eestikeelne väljaanne

Teave ja teatised

61. aastakäik28. märts 2018

---

| Teatis nr | Sisukord | Lehekülg |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Teated |
| | HALDUSMENETLUSED |
| | Euroopa Parlament |
| 2018/C 114 A/01 | Valikumenetlus PE/199/S — Ajutine teenistuja – juhtkonna tugiametnik (AD 5) — Sobivate kandidaatide nimekiri | 1 |

Teatis nr

Sisukord

Lehekülg

V   Teated

HALDUSMENETLUSED

Euroopa Parlament

2018/C 114 A/01

Valikumenetlus PE/199/S — Ajutine teenistuja – juhtkonna tugiametnik (AD 5) — Sobivate kandidaatide nimekiri

1

---

| ET | |
| --- | --- |

ET

---

V Teated

HALDUSMENETLUSED

Euroopa Parlament

| 28.3.2018 | ET | Euroopa Liidu Teataja | CA 114/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.3.2018

ET

Euroopa Liidu Teataja

CA 114/1

---

VALIKUMENETLUS PE/199/S

Ajutine teenistuja – juhtkonna tugiametnik (AD 5)

SOBIVATE KANDIDAATIDE NIMEKIRI

(2018/C 114 A/01)

| 1. | FISCHER, Jessica Isabell |
| --- | --- |

1.

FISCHER, Jessica Isabell

| 2. | LEMAIRE, Cléo |
| --- | --- |

2.

LEMAIRE, Cléo

| 3. | COURTADE, Christelle |
| --- | --- |

3.

COURTADE, Christelle

Sobivate kandidaatide nimekiri aegub 31. detsembril 2020.

---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 51 (Monday, March 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 12609]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6643]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

National Defense Panel

action: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

summary: This notice sets forth the schedule and summary agenda for the 
meeting of the National Defense Panel on March 26 and 27, 1997. In 
accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 
Public Law 92-463, as amended [5 U.S.C. App. II, (1982)], it has been 
determined that this National Defense Panel meeting concerns matters 
listed in 5 U.S.C. Sec. 552b(c)(1)(1982), and that accordingly this 
meeting will be closed to the public in order for the Panel to discuss 
classified material.

dates: March 26 and 27, 1997.

addresses: Suite 504, 1931 Jefferson Davis Hwy, Arlington, VA.

supplementary information: The National Defense Panel was established 
on January 14, 1997, in accordance with the Military Force Structure 
Review Act of 1996, Public Law 104-201. The mission of the National 
Defense Panel is to provide the Secretary of Defense and Congress with 
an independent, non-partisan assessment of the Secretary's Quadrennial 
Defense Review and an Alternative Force Structure Analysis. This 
analysis will explore innovative ways to meet the national security 
challenges of the twenty-first Century.

proposed schedule and agenda: The National Defense Panel will meet in 
closed session from 8:30 AM until 5:00 PM on March 26 and 27, 1997. The 
Panel will discuss classified national intelligence information to 
assess the international security environment and make recommendations 
to the Secretary of Defense for further study. They will also discuss 
the Quadrennial Defense Review actions of the seven QDR panels dealing 
with Infrastructure, Modernization, Readiness, Force Structure, Human 
Resources, Information Operations and Intelligence, and Strategy and 
make recommendations on areas of further study. These discussions are 
based upon classified information provided by the DoD QDR Panels.

for further information contact: Please contact the National Defense 
Panel at (703) 602-4175.

    Dated: March 12, 1997.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 97-6643 Filed 3-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
Exhibit
                                                                99.3


                 BROWN-BENCHMARK PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the filing of Brown-Benchmark Properties Limited
Partnership's (the "Partnership") Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending June 30, 2002 with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Daniel P. Riedel, the Chief Executive Officer of
Benchmark Equities, Inc., Development General Partner of the Partnership,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                  section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                  of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Partnership.



By: /s/Daniel P. Riedel

Daniel P. Riedel
Chief Executive Officer
Benchmark Equities, Inc.
Development General Partner
August 6, 2002
# Instructions

INSTRUCTIONS: Please use this template to fill in the "Consortium Members" tab. Fill in all of your consortium member organizations, their categorizations, project role(s), and which component project(s) they are associated with.You should only list members who are part of your governance structure. Do not include supporting organizations who are not in your consortium. Please name this file "YOUR TECH HUB NAME - Consortium Membership February 2024" DEFINITIONS:• Labor Organization: Includes labor unions and federations. See 29 CFR 401.9 for full definition.  For the following categories, see the most recent list of qualifying institutions in the U.S. Department of Education Eligibility Matrix 2023. • Tribal College/University: A college or university that is formally controlled, sanctioned, or chartered by a Tribal Government. See 25 CFR 41.3 for full definition. • Native American Serving Non-Tribal Institution: A college or university on with an undergraduate enrollment that is at least 10% Native American students and is not a Tribal College or University. See full definition at www2.ed.gov/programs/nasnti/eligibility.html.• Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian Serving Institution: A college or university on with an undergraduate enrollment that is at least 20% Alaska Native students or at least 10% Native Hawaiian students. See full definition at www2.ed.gov/programs/iduesannh/eligibility.html.• Historically Black College/University or Predominantly Black Institution: A historically Black college or university that was established prior to 1964 with the principal mission of educating Black Americans or a college or university with an undergraduate enrollment that is at least 40% Black American students, at least 1,000 students total, and where at least 50% of the students are low-income individuals or first-generation college students; see full definition at https://www2.ed.gov/programs/pbihea/eligibility.html.• Hispanic-Serving Institution: A college or university with an undergraduate enrollment that is at least 25% Hispanic students and where at least 50% of its Hispanic students are low-income individuals. See 34 CFR 606.2 for full definition.• Asian American and Native American Pacific Islander-Serving Institution: A college or university with an undergraduate enrollment that is at least 10% Asian American and Native American Pacific Islander students and where at least 50% of its students are low-income individuals. See full definition at www2.ed.gov/programs/aanapi/eligibility.html. 

# Consortium Members

# Ignore - Data Validation
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
pertaining to the United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. 1992 Stock Option Plan, as
Amended and Restated, (Form S-8 Nos. 33-58311 and 333-101290) and in the
Registration Statement pertaining to the United States Lime & Minerals, Inc.
2001 Long-Term Incentive Plan (Form S-8 No. 333-90876), of our report dated
February 6, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. and subsidiaries included in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.

Dallas, Texas
March 29, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 52 (Tuesday, March 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 12825]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6768]



[[Page 12825]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP97-264-000]


Shell Gas Pipeline Company; Notice of Petition for Waiver

March 12, 1997.
    Take notice that on February 28, 1997, Shell Gas Pipeline Company 
(Shell) tendered for filing a petition for an interim waiver of 
Commission Order No. 587-B issued January 30, 1997 in Docket No. RM96-
1-003.
    Shell states that it has entered into an agreement with Southern 
Natural Gas Company (Southern) for the use of the SoNet electronic 
bulletin board system. Southern is in the process of developing a new 
system which should be available September 1, 1997.
    Shell requests waiver of Order No. 587-B to extend the deadline to 
allow Shell to implement the requirements of Order No. 587-B in 
conjunction with the start-up of Southern's new computer system.
    Shell states that copies of the filing has been served on all 
shippers and interstate commissions of Shell.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rule 211 and Rule 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR Section 385.211 and Section 385.214). 
All such motions or protests must be filed on or before March 19, 1997. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,


Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97-6768 Filed 3-17-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
### RE: The Revised MeBr is Now in ROCIS Frey, Nathan J. to: Philip Schwartz, Jeremy Arling 09/01/2011 10:22 AM

We have concluded our review of the 2012 MeBR CUE proposed rule. Thanks all. -----Original Message----- From: Schwartz.Philip@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Schwartz.Philip@epamail.epa.gov ] Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 3:21 PM To: Frey, Nathan J.; Arling.Jeremy@epamail.epa.gov Subject: The Revised MeBr is Now in ROCIS
(Embedded image moved to file: pic08188.gif)
No. 11-10625.

#### Rodriguez *v.*Department of State.

C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-10667.

#### Henderson *v.*Bauman, Warden.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11A952 (11-10740).

#### Holston *v.*Tucker, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

C. A. 11th Cir. Application for bail, addressed to Justice Kagan and referred to the Court, denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                EXHIBIT 10(a)(5)


                                 FIRST AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                     QUAKER LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN OF 1999

         WHEREAS, The Quaker Long Term Incentive Plan of 1999 (the "Plan"), was
established by The Quaker Oats Company (the "Company") for the benefit of its
eligible employees; and

         WHEREAS, amendment of the Plan is desirable to eliminate the
cancellation and payment of cash in connection with any change in control
transaction which would preclude pooling of interests accounting, if such
treatment would otherwise apply to the transaction, but otherwise retain the
full effect and benefit of the plan provisions, including the elimination of
further service requirements as a condition of the options or restricted stock;

         NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the authority delegated to the undersigned
by resolution of the Board of Directors of the Company, the Plan is hereby
amended as of the 21st day of November, 2000, by adding a new paragraph 9.1(f)
immediately following paragraph 9.1(e) as follows:

         (f) Pooling of Interests. Notwithstanding any other provision of the
         Plan, Options outstanding on the date of a Change in Control which is
         intended to qualify as a pooling of interests transaction which would
         otherwise be cancelled and cashed out in accordance with paragraph (a)
         above, after application of the limitations set forth in paragraph (e)
         above, shall not be subject to any additional service requirement as a
         condition of exercise but otherwise shall not be subject to the
         provisions of such paragraph (a), and the Restricted Period with
         respect to Restricted Stock, which would otherwise be cancelled and
         cashed out in accordance with paragraph (b) above, after application of
         the limitations of paragraph (e) above, shall lapse on the date of any
         such Change in Control but such Restricted Stock shall not otherwise be
         subject to the provisions of such paragraph (b).

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment is executed below by a duly
authorized officer of the Company.


                                         The Quaker Oats Company

                                         By:  /s/ Robert S. Morrison
                                             -----------------------------------
                                         Its: Chairman, President, and
                                             -----------------------------------
                                              Chief Executive Officer
                                             -----------------------------------
**Exhibit
      31.1**




**CERTIFICATION**





I,
      Joseph
      Sarachek, as the President and Chief Executive Officer of PubliCARD, Inc. (the
      “Company”), certify that:




1.  I
      have
      reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of the Company;





2.  Based
      on
      my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.  Based
      on
      my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
      in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
      results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
      periods presented in this report;





4.  I
      am
      responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
      (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) **** for
      the
      registrant and have:





(a)
      Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that
      material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly
      during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b)
      Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness
      of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
      by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c)
      Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter
      that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
      the
      registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5.  I
      have
      disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
      reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the
      registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
      functions):





(a)  All
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
      report financial information; and





(b)  Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting.


Date:
                April 13, 2007
            
            
            /s/
                Joseph E. SarachekJoseph
                E. SarachekPresident,
                Chief Executive Officer
No. 11-10750.

#### Reed *v.*Florida Parole Commission.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Form 10-K for Puget Energy, Inc. and Puget Sound Energy,
      Inc. (the "Companies") for the year ended December
      31, 2006 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form
      10-K"), I, Stephen
      P. Reynolds ,
      the Chairman,
      President and Chief Executive Officer of the
      Companies, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)  The
      Form
      10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Companies.











Date:
                March 1, 2007/s/Stephen
                P. ReynoldsStephen
                P. ReynoldsChairman,
                President and Chief Executive
                Officer