alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 41 (Monday, March 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 9441]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5164]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health

Notice of Meeting of the Advisory Committee on Blood Safety and 
Availability

    Pursuant to Pub. L 92-463, notice is hereby given of the meeting of 
the Advisory Committee on Blood Safety and Availability, Department of 
Health and Human Services, March 20-21, 1997. This meeting will be held 
at the National Institutes of Health, Warren G. Magnuson Clinical 
Center, Jack Masur Auditorium, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, Maryland 
20892.
    The entire meeting will be open to the public from 8:30 a.m. on 
March 20 to adjournment on March 21. On March 20, the Committee will 
discuss hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, its occurrence following 
blood transfusion, other epidemiology of HCV infection and appropriate 
ways of approaching the public health aspects of this infection. On 
March 21, the Committee will address multiple aspects of the 
theoretical possibility that Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) can be 
transmitted by blood transfusion. For each topic, a time will be set 
aside for the public to comment. Prospective speakers should notify the 
Executive Secretary for this meeting of their wish to present and 
should plan for no more than 5 minutes of comments.
    Contact: Paul R. McCurdy, M.D. Acting Executive Secretary, Advisory 
Committee on Blood Safety and Availability, Director, Blood Resources 
Program, DBDR-MSC-7950, NHLBI, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-7950. 
Phone: 301/435-0065; Fax 301/480-1060; E-Mail: [email protected].
    Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, such as 
sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should 
contact the Executive Secretary in advance of the meeting.

    Dated: February 25, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-5164 Filed 2-28-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****    - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский 

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

        - Student Loans
        - Grants
        - Laws
        - Data

# The Transformative Influence of Academic Advisors

As a college student in the early 2000s, I was fortunate to have an academic advisor to guide me as I pursued learning opportunities, faced challenges, and explored career goals. Now, as a researcher of academic advising and former post-secondary advisor, I’m sharing my experience to shed light on what advisors do, help students connect

Continue Reading

The post The Transformative Influence of Academic Advisors appeared first on ED.gov Blog.

The Transformative Influence of Academic Advisors

01/31/2024 - 10:00am

----

*Our mission* is to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness by fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access.

          - Student Loans
          - Repaying Loans
          - Defaulted Loans
          - Loan Forgiveness
          - Loan Servicers
          - Grants & Programs
          - Apply for Pell Grants
          - Grants Forecast
          - Apply for a Grant

          - Laws & Guidance
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - Civil Rights
          - IDEA Website
          - Data & Research
          - Education Statistics
          - Postsecondary Education Data
          - ED Data Express
          - Nation's Report Card
          - What Works Clearinghouse
          - Open Data Platform
          - COVID Relief Data

          - About Us
          - Contact Us
          - ED Offices
          - Jobs
          - Press Releases
          - FAQs
          - Recursos en español
          - Budget, Performance
          - Privacy Program
          - Homeroom Blog

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information Quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
Opinion issued July 28, 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01 - 1 6 - 00 567 - CR

——————————— IN RE GERALD ALLEN PERRY , Relator
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator, Gerald Allen Perry , proceeding pro se and incarcerated, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus. Relator seek s to c ompel the respondent trial judge
to vacate the order denying his motion to suppress evidence and to recall this Court’s mandate and vacate this Court’s judgment affirm ing his 1994 conviction in the underlying proceeding

. 1 We dismiss for want of jurisdiction

.

1 The underlying case is The State of Texas v. Gerald Allen Perry , Cause No. 607922 , 18 0th District Court, Harris County, Texas, The Honorable Catherine Evans2

As we previously stated in dismi ssing for want of jurisdiction relator ’s similar appeal of the respondent’s 2014 order denying his motion to recall the 1994 mandate, “Article 11.07 provides the exclusive means to challenge a final felony conviction” and “[o]nly the Texas Court of Crimina l Appeals has jurisdiction over matters related to post

- conviction relief from a final felony conviction.” Perry v. State , No. 01

– 14

– 00577

– CR, 2014 WL 5593754, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] Nov. 4, 2014, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publi cation) (cit ing, inter alia , T EX C ODE . C RIM . P ROC . A NN . art. 11.07, § 5 (West Supp. 201 1) ). Because relator’s felony conviction became final in 1994, this is a final post

- conviction felony proceeding for which we lack jurisdiction. See id. Accordingly, w e d ismiss the petition f or writ of mandamus for want of jurisdiction

. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Keyes , Brown, and Huddle

. Do not publish. T EX . R. A PP . P. 47.2(b).

presiding. We affirmed appellant’s conviction for aggravated robbery, for which his punishment was ass e ss ed at forty

- five years’ confinement an d a $2,000 fine, on February 24, 1994, and we issued our mandate on August 23, 1994. See Perry v. State , No. 01

– 93

– 00207

– CR, 1994 WL 52499, at *3 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] Feb. 24, 1994, no writ) (not designated for publication).
# C_2022148EN.01004601.xml

| 4.4.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.4.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/46

---

Action brought on 21 February 2022 — Boshab v Council

(Case T-98/22)

(2022/C 148/62)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Évariste Boshab (Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo) (represented by: T. Bontinck, P. De Wolf, A. Guillerme and T. Payan, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should

| — | annul Council decision (CFSP) 2021/2181 of 8 December 2021 (1) in so far as the applicant remains at No 6 in the annex to that decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Council decision (CFSP) 2021/2181 of 8 December 2021 (1) in so far as the applicant remains at No 6 in the annex to that decision;

| — | annul Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2177 of 9 December 2021 (2) in so far as the applicant remains at No 6 in Annex I to that regulation; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2177 of 9 December 2021 (2) in so far as the applicant remains at No 6 in Annex I to that regulation;

| — | order the Council to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law, which are, in essence, identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-90/22, Kande Mupompa v Council.

---

(1)  Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/2181 of 9 December 2021, amending decision 2010/788/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic Republic of the Congo (OJ 2021 L 443, p. 75).

(2)  Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2181 of 9 December 2021 implementing Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005 imposing certain restrictive measures directed against persons acting in violation of the arms embargo with regard to the Democratic Republic of Congo (OJ 2021 L 443, p. 3).

---
No. 11-10796.

#### E. C. *v.*California.

Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
# C_2023179EN.01003802.xml

| 22.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/38

---

Judgment of the General Court of 22 March 2023 — NY v Commission

(Case T-21/22) (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Commission’s internal security investigation - Alleged acts of violence by the Commission’s security personnel - Prohibition of entry into buildings - Confiscation of service pass - Claim for compensation - Dismissal of the claim - Principle of good administration - Right to integrity and dignity - Error of assessment - Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials)

(2023/C 179/55)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: NY (represented by: A. Champetier and S. Rodrigues, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Lilamand and L. Vernier, acting as Agents)

Re:

By his action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the European Commission of 14 April 2021 by which the latter dismissed his claim for compensation and, where appropriate, of the decision of 4 October 2021 by which the latter rejected his complaint.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 95, 28.2.2022.

---
EX-10.9



 Exhibit 10.9 
  





 
 Arista Networks, Inc 

5470 Great America Pkwy 
 Santa Clara,
CA 95054 
 Charles Giancarlo 
 [home address] 

March 27, 2013 
 Dear Charlie: 

Arista Networks, Inc. (the “Company”) is pleased to offer you a position as a member of the Company’s Board of Directors (the
“Board”) effective upon formal approval by the Board. What follows is information on some of the benefits available to you as a director of the Company (a “Director”). 

As compensation for your services to the Company, you will be granted a stock option to purchase 30,000 shares of Arista Networks Inc common stock, which will
vest over 5 years at the rate of 1/60 each month, subject to your continued service as a Director of the Company on the applicable vesting date. If the Company were to get acquired, 50% of your unvested shares will fully vest. The stock option is
subject to the terms and conditions of the Company’s 2011 Equity Incentive Plan and grant agreements, which are incorporated herein by reference. 

The Company will also reimburse you for all reasonable expenses incurred by you in connection with your services to the Company. All reimbursements are in
accordance with established Company policies. 
 Board meetings are generally held on site at the Company quarterly and we would hope that your schedule
would permit you to attend all of the meetings. In addition, there may be telephonic calls to address special projects that arise from time to time. The Board has also delegated certain duties to committees on which you may be asked to serve. 

Nothing in this offer or the stock option agreement should be construed to interfere with or otherwise restrict in any way the rights of the Company and the
Company’s stockholders to remove any individual from the Board at any time in accordance with the provisions of applicable law. 
 This letter sets
forth the terms of your service as a Director with the Company and supersedes any prior representations or agreements, whether written or oral. This letter may not be modified or amended except by a written agreement, signed by an officer of the
Company and by you. 
 We hope that you find the foregoing terms acceptable. You may indicate your agreement with these terms and accept this offer by
signing and dating both copies and and returning the original letter to me. 
 Charlie: I am looking forward to you joining the Company’s Board of
Directors. I believe you will make a significant contribution to the Company and its future direction. 
 Sincerely, 

 /s/ Andreas Bechtolsheim 
 Andreas Bechtolsheim, Chairman

 ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO, this 30th day of March 2013 
  

	
	  /s/ Charles Giancarlo

	Charles Giancarlo
Exhibit 32.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of Puget Energy, Inc. and Puget Sound Energy, Inc. (the Companies) on
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-K), I, Stephen P.
Reynolds, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Companies, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

| | (1) | The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
               Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                    |                                      
|------------------- | -------------------------------------
|Date: March 9, 2004 |                                      
|                    |                                      
|                    | /s/ Stephen P. Reynolds              
|                    |                                      
|                    | Stephen P. Reynolds                  
|                    | President and Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 40 (Friday, February 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 9189]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5146]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Pursuant to the provisions of the ``Government in the Sunshine 
Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that at 10:15 a.m. on 
Tuesday, February 25, 1997, the Board of Directors of the Federal 
Deposit Insurance Corporation met in closed session to consider matters 
relating to the Corporation's corporate, supervisory and administrative 
enforcement activities.
    In calling the meeting, the Board determined, on motion of Vice 
Chairman Andrew C. Hove, Jr., seconded by Director Joseph H. Neely 
(Appointive), concurred in by Director Nicolas P. Retsinas (Director, 
Office of Thrift Supervision), Director Eugene A. Ludwig (Comptroller 
of the Currency), and Chairman Ricki Helfer, that Corporation business 
required its consideration of the matters on less than seven days' 
notice to the public; that no earlier notice of the meeting was 
practicable; that the public interest did not require consideration of 
the matters in a meeting open to public observation; and that the 
matters could be considered in a closed meeting by authority of 
subsections (c)(2), (c)(2), (c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8) and (c)(9(A)(ii) of 
the ``Government in the Sunshine Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b (c)(2), (c)(4), 
(c)(6), (c)(8) and (c)(9)(A)(ii)).
    The meeting was held in the Board Room of the FDIC Building located 
at 550--17th Street, NW., Washington, DC.

    Dated: February 25, 1997.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Valerie J. Best,
Assistant Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-5146 Filed 2-26-97; 11:18 am]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-M
EX-10.4(b)



 Exhibit 10.4(b) 

 

			
	June 1, 2013	  	

 Willowbridge Associates Inc. 
 101 Morgan Lane - Suite 180 
 Plainsboro, N.J. 08536 

Attention: Mr Steve R. Crane 
  

	 	Re:	Management Agreement Renewals 

 Dear
Mr. Crane: 
 We are writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the commodity pools to which reference is made below
(the “Management Agreements”). We are extending the term of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2014 and all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged. 

 

	 	•	 	 Diversified Multi-Advisor Futures Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 Diversified Multi-Advisor Futures Fund L.P. II 


  

	 	•	 	 Tactical Diversified Futures Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 CMF Willowbridge Argo Master Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 Emerging CTA Portfolio LP 



Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of Mr. Damian George at the
address above or fax to 212-296-6868. If you have any questions I can be reached at 212-296-1292. 
  

			
	Very truly yours,
	
	CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Damian George

		 	 Damian George

		 	Chief Financial Officer & Director
	
	WILLOWBRIDGE ASSOCIATES INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Steven R. Crane



			
		
	Print Name:	 	Steven R. Crane

 DG/sr
# C_2023104EN.01001501.xml

| 20.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 104/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 104/15

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 15 December 2022 — Meta Platforms Ireland Limited v Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände — Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband e.V.

(Case C-757/22, Meta Platforms Ireland)

(2023/C 104/19)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant in the appeal on a point of law: Meta Platforms Ireland Limited

Respondent in the appeal on a point of law: Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände — Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband e.V.

Question referred

Is an infringement of rights ‘as a result of the processing’ within the meaning of Article 80(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (General Data Protection Regulation) (1) asserted when a consumer protection association invokes, in support of its action, infringement of a data subject’s rights on the ground of non-compliance with the information obligations laid down in the first sentence of Article 12(1) of Regulation 2016/679, read in conjunction with Article 13(1)(c) and (e) of Regulation 2016/679, relating to the purpose of the data processing and the recipient of the personal data?

---

(1)  Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (OJ 2016 L 119, p. 1).

---
Exhibit 32.b



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of DataJungle Software Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:



The Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the Form 10-KSB) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-KSB.







|Dated: March 31, 2005 |  | /s/Larry Bruce 
Larry Bruce
Vice President Finance, Secretary & Treasurer
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------











The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-KSB pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-B and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-KSB for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.













1
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 50 (Friday, March 14, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 12104]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6429]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 95-142; RM-8685]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Zapata, TX

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission, at the request of Arturo Lopez, allots Channel 
228A at Zapata, Texas, as the community's first local FM service. See 
60 FR 46562, September 7, 1995. Channel 228A can be allotted to Zapata 
in compliance with the Commission's minimum distance separation 
requirements without the imposition of a site restriction. The 
coordinates for Channel 228A at Zapata are 26-54-30 NL and 99-16-18 WL. 
Since Zapata is located within 320 kilometers (199 miles) of the U.S.-
Mexican border, concurrence of the Mexican government has been obtained 
for this allotment.With this action, this proceeding is terminated.

DATES: Effective April 21, 1997. The window period for filing 
applications will open on April 21, 1997, and close on May 22, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pam Blumenthal, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MM Docket No. 95-142, adopted February 26, 1997, and 
released March 7, 1997. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW, Washington, DC. 
The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractor, ITS, Inc., (202) 857-3800, 2100 M Street, 
NW, Suite 140, Washington, DC 20037.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.
    Part 73 of title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

PART 73--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for Part 73 continues to read as follows:
    Authority: Secs. 303, 48 Stat., as amended, 1082; 47 U.S.C. 154, 
as amended.


Sec. 73.202  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Texas, is 
amended by adding Zapata, Channel 228A.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 97-6429 Filed 3-13-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F