alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2023321EN.01001302.xml

| 11.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 321/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 321/13

---

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 13 July 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia n. 17 de Palma de Mallorca — Spain) — ZR, PI v Banco Santander, SA

(Case C-265/22, (1) Banco Santander (Reference to an official index))

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Consumer protection - Directive 93/13/EEC - Unfair terms in consumer contracts - Mortgage loan agreements - Term providing for a variable interest rate - Reference index based on the annual percentage rates of charge (APRC) of mortgage loans granted by credit institutions - Index established by a regulatory or administrative act - Information contained in the preamble to that act - Check relating to the requirement of transparency - Assessment of the unfair nature of the term)

(2023/C 321/16)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Juzgado de Primera Instancia n. 17 de Palma de Mallorca

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: ZR, PI

Defendant: Banco Santander, SA

Operative part of the judgment

Article 3(1), Article 4 and Article 5 of Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts,

must be interpreted as meaning that, in order to assess the transparency and potential unfairness of a term in a variable-rate mortgage loan agreement that designates as a reference index, for the periodic review of the interest rate applicable to that loan, an index established by a notice the subject of an official publication, to which an increase is applied, the content of the information contained in another notice — indicating the need to apply to that index, in view of its method of calculation, a negative margin in order to align that interest rate with the market rate — is relevant. It is also relevant whether that information is sufficiently accessible for an average consumer.

---

(1)  
  OJ C 326, 29.8.2022.

---
No. 11-10830.

#### Mbacke *v.*North Carolina.

Sup. Ct. N. C. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 47 (Tuesday, March 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11219-11220]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5885]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Indian Gaming

ACTION: Notice of approved tribal/state compact.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 11 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, 25 
U.S.C. Sec. 2710, the Secretary of the Interior shall publish, in the 
Federal Register, notice of approved Tribal/State Compacts for the 
purpose of engaging in Class III (casino) gambling on Indian 
reservations. The Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs, Department of 
the Interior, through her delegated authority, has approved the Tribal/
State Gaming Compact between the Otoe-Missouria Tribe and the State of 
Oklahoma, which was executed on December 6, 1996.

DATES: This action is effective March 11, 1997.


[[Page 11220]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George T. Skibine, Director, Indian 
Gaming Management Staff, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Washington, D.C. 
20240, (202) 219-4068.

    Dated: February 21, 1997.
Ada E. Deer,
Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 97-5885 Filed 3-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-02-P
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 46 (Monday, March 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10831-10832]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5757]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-63-002]


Notice of Tariff Compliance Filing

March 4, 1997.
    Take notice that on February 28, 1997, Colorado Interstate Gas 
Company (CIG), tendered for filing to become part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1, the tariff sheets listed in 
Appendix A to the filing, to be effective May 1, 1997.
    CIG states the tariff sheets are filed in compliance with Order No. 
587, and the order issued January 16, 1997, in Docket No. RP97-63-000, 
as well as Section 154.203 of the Commission's regulations. CIG further 
states the tariff sheets filed are the same as the pro forma tariff 
sheets filed by CIG on November 1, 1996 to comply with Order No. 487 
except (1) the tariff sheets have been revised to reflect tariff 
filings made between the November 1, 1996 filing and the date of this 
filing, (2) changes have been made to comply with the requirements of 
the order issued January 16, 1997 in Docket No. RP97-63-000 and, (3) as 
required in Order No. 587-B issued January 30, 1997, CIG is 
incorporating by reference into its tariff the Electronic Delivery 
Mechanism (EDM) standards adopted in that rule.
    CIG has further requested any waivers necessary to change its Gas 
Day to the GISB Standard effective April 7, 1997.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Regulations. All such protests must be filed on or before 
March 21, 1997. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are 
on file with the Commission and are

[[Page 10832]]

available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-5757 Filed 3-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 11-10593.

#### Padilla *v.*Texas.

Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Cer-tiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 48 (Wednesday, March 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 11459]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6172]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA)


Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given of the 
following teleconference meeting of the SAMHSA Special Emphasis Panel 
II in March.
    A summary of the meeting and a roster of the members may be 
obtained from: Ms. Dee Herman, Committee Management Liaison, SAMHSA 
Office of Extramural Activities Review, 5600 Fishers Lane, Room 17-89, 
Rockville, Maryland 20857. Telephone: (301) 443-4783.
    Substantive program information may be obtained from the individual 
named as Contact for the meeting listed below.
    The meeting will include the review, discussion and evaluation of 
individual grant applications. The discussion could reveal personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the applications. 
Accordingly, this meeting is concerned with matters exempt from 
mandatory disclosure in Title 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(6) and 5 U.S.C. App.2, 
Sec. 10(d).
    Committee Name: SAMHSA Special Emphasis Panel II (SEP II).
    Meeting Dates: March 19, 1997, 1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Place: Parklawn Building, Room 12-94--Telephone Conference, 5600 
Fishers Lane, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
    Closed: March 19, 1997, 1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Panel: FEMA--Crisis Counseling--Idaho and California.
    Contact: Pamela Roddy, Ph.D., Review Administrator, Room 17-89, 
Parklawn Building, Telephone: (301) 443-1001 and FAX: (301) 443-3437.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the urgent need to meet timing limitations imposed by 
the review and funding cycle.

    Dated: March 5, 1997.
Jeri Lipov,
Committee Management Officer, SAMHSA.
[FR Doc. 97-6172 Filed 3-11-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162-20-P
#### IN RE: Minon MILLER, Debtor. Minon Miller, Appellant, v. Edward Gilliam, Appellee.

No. 16-60087

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted December 18, 2017 *

Filed December 26, 2017

Minon Miller, Pro Se

Edward Gilliam, Pro Se

Before: WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

*396MEMORANDUM **

Chapter 7 debtor Minon Miller appeals pro se from the judgment of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (“BAP”) affirming the bankruptcy court’s order dismissing Miller’s bankruptcy case. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We review de novo BAP decisions, and apply the same standard of review that the BAP applied to the bankruptcy court’s ruling. *Boyajian v. New Falls Corp. (In re Boyajian),*564 F.3d 1088, 1090 (9th Cir. 2009). We affirm.

The bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Miller’s chapter 7 petition because the record supports the bankruptcy court’s extensive findings of abuse and bad faith. *See*11 U.S.C. §§ 707(b)(1), (b)(3)(A); Price *v. U.S. Trustee (In re Price),*353 F.3d 1135, 1138 (9th Cir. 2004) (reviewing for clear error a bankruptcy court’s factual findings and for an abuse of discretion its decision to dismiss a chapter 7 bankruptcy petition).

To the extent Miller argues that the bankruptcy court violated due process by considering any of Gilliam’s motions, we reject the contention because the record shows that the bankruptcy court provided Miller with adequate opportunity to respond and be heard.

We reject as without merit Miller’s contentions that the bankruptcy judge should have recused himself.

We do not consider arguments raised for the first time on appeal or matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued in the opening brief. *See Padgett v. Wright,*587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
# Mental Health

- Biden-Harris Administration Announces New Supports to Increase Reach of Mental Health Services and Professionals in Schools The Biden-Harris Administration today is announcing a $2.6 million award to support mental health services and professionals in schools, further delivering on a key priority of the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act (BSCA).
- U.S. Department of Education Announces More Than $188 Million from the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act to Support Mental Health and Student Wellness Today, the U.S. Department of Education  (Department) is announcing awards of more than $188  million across 170 grantees in over 30  states to increase access to school-based mental health  services and to strengthen the pipeline of  mental health professionals in high-needs districts.
- Fact Sheet: Biden-Harris Administration Announces Two New Actions to Address Youth Mental Health Crisis Our nation's young people are facing an unprecedented mental health crisis. Even before the pandemic, rates of depression, anxiety and suicidal thoughts among youth were on the rise. The pandemic exacerbated those issues, disrupting learning, relationships, and routines and increasing isolation—especially among our nation's young people.
- Education Department Hosts Virtual Summit Today, Announces New Efforts and Resources for Supporting Mental Health and Students with Disabilities Today, the U.S.
- Building on President Biden's Unity Agenda, Education Department Urges Colleges to Use American Rescue Plan Funds to Provide Mental Health Supports to Students Today, the U.S. Department of Education published new guidance to assist institutions in providing mental health supports for students, faculty, and staff. The guidance will help colleges support students as they navigate mental health challenges exacerbated by the pandemic.
# C_2022318EN.01003801.xml

| 22.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 318/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 318/38

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 4 July 2022 — Lacapelle v Parliament

(Case T-240/22 R)

(Interim relief - Law governing the Institutions - Member of Parliament - Exclusion from participation in election observation delegations of the Parliament - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Lack of urgency)

(2022/C 318/52)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Jean-Lin Lacapelle (Paris, France) (represented by: F.-P. Vos, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: N. Görlitz and T. Lukácsi, acting as Agents)

Re:

By his application based on Articles 278 and 279 TFEU, the applicant seeks suspension of the operation of Decision D-301937 of the Co-Chairs of the Democracy Support and Election Coordination Group of 3 March 2022, which excluded him from participation in the election observation delegations of the European Parliament until the end of his term of office as a Member of Parliament (2019-2024).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim relief is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim relief is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
Exhibit 99



                              Pyramid Oil Company
                                2008 21st Street
                              Bakersfield, CA 93301


March 28, 2002



Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20549


Gentlemen:

Our auditors, Arthur Andersen LLP, have represented to Pyramid Oil Company in
a letter dated March 28, 2002 that its audit of the financial statements
included in Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K were subject to
Andersen's quality control system for the U. S. accounting and auditing
practice to provide reasonable assurance that the engagement was conducted in
compliance with professional standards, that there was appropriate continuity
of Arthur Andersen personnel working on the audit and availability of national
office consultation to conduct the relevant portions of the audit.
Availability of personnel at foreign affiliates of Arthur Andersen is not
relevant to this audit.


Sincerely,
Pyramid Oil Company


Lee G. Christianson
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Edward Munden, certify that: (1)I have reviewed this report on Form 10-KSB of DataJungle Software Inc.;  (2)Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  (3)Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operation and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods represented in this report;  (4)The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c)Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  (5)The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal controls over financial reporting.  /s/Edward Munden Edward Munden President & Chief Executive Officer  Date: April 16, 2007    1         2
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9030 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to temporarily expand the 

deduction for business meals provided at a restaurant. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 18, 2020 

Mr. JOYCE of Ohio introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to temporarily 

expand the deduction for business meals provided at 

a restaurant. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Supporting America’s 

5 Restaurant Workers Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. TEMPORARY ALLOWANCE OF FULL DEDUCTION 

7 FOR BUSINESS MEALS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 274(n)(2) of the Internal 

9 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘or’’ at the 

10 end of subparagraph (B), by striking the period at the 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 9030 IH

1 end of subparagraph (C)(iv) and inserting ‘‘, or’’, and by 

2 inserting after subparagraph (C) the following new sub3 paragraph: 

4 ‘‘(D) such expense is— 

5 ‘‘(i) for food or beverages provided by 

6 a restaurant, and 

7 ‘‘(ii) paid or incurred before January 

8 1, 2022.’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

10 this section shall apply to amounts paid or incurred after 

11 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                State of Incorporation
                                                ----------------------
Subsidiary Name                                     or Organization
---------------                                     ---------------
<S>                                                   <C>
Archstone Communities Incorporated                    Delaware
SCP Nevada Holdings 1 Incorporated                    Nevada
SCP Utah Holdings 4 Incorporated                      Utah
SCP Utah Holdings 5 Incorporated                      Utah
Las Flores Development                                Texas
PTR-California Holdings (1) Incorporated              Maryland
PTR-California Holdings (2) Incorporated              Maryland
PTR-California Holdings (3) Incorporated              Delaware
PTR Multifamily Holdings Incorporated                 Delaware
Archstone Financial Services, Inc.                    Delaware
PTR-Colorado (1), LLC                                 Colorado
Security Capital Atlantic Multifamily Inc.            Delaware
SCA Florida Holdings (1) Incorporated                 Florida
Atlantic-Alabama (5) Incorporated                     Maryland
Atlantic-Alabama (6) Incorporated                     Maryland
SCA-Alabama Multifamily Trust                         Alabama
SCA-North Carolina (1) Incorporated                   Maryland
SCA-North Carolina (2) Incorporated                   Maryland
SCA North Carolina Limited Partnership                Delaware
SCA-Indiana Limited Partnership                       Delaware
SCA-Tennessee (3) Incorporated                        Maryland
SCA-Tennessee (4) Incorporated                        Maryland
Atlantic-Tennessee Limited Partnership                Delaware
SCA Florida Holdings (2) Incorporated                 Delaware
SCA-1 Incorporated                                    Delaware
Atlantic Multifamily Limited Partnership-1            Delaware
Archstone Communities Limited Partnership             Delaware
ASN Minnesota Holdings (1) LLC                        Delaware
ASN Multifamily Limited Partnership                   Delaware
ASN-Massachusetts Holdings (1) Incorporated           Delaware
ASN-Washington Holdings (1) Incorporated              Delaware
NEC Tatum and Bell Owner's Association, Inc.          Arizona
Turtle Run at Coral Springs, LLC                      Delaware
Archstone Communities Limited Partnership II          Delaware
ASN- Massachusetts Holdings (3) Incorporated          Delaware
Archstone Communities Investment LLC-I                Delaware
ASN- San Diego Incorporated                           Delaware
ASN Studio City Incorporated                          Delaware
</TABLE>