alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2022424EN.01002601.xml

| 7.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 424/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 424/26

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Brașov (Romania) lodged on 27 July 2022 — KL, PO v Administrația Județeană a Finanțelor Publice Brașov

(Case C-508/22)

(2022/C 424/33)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Curtea de Apel Brașov

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellants: KL, PO

Respondent: Administrația Județeană a Finanțelor Publice Brașov

Questions referred

| 1. | Can EU law (Article 110 TFEU) be interpreted as meaning that the amount of a tax prohibited under EU law is incorporated in the value of a vehicle and may be transferred to third-party purchasers along with the right of ownership over the vehicle? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Can EU law (Article 110 TFEU) be interpreted as meaning that the amount of a tax prohibited under EU law is incorporated in the value of a vehicle and may be transferred to third-party purchasers along with the right of ownership over the vehicle?

| 2. | Does the interpretation of [Article] 110 TFEU preclude national rules, such as those laid down by Article 1 of OUG No 52/2017, under which a refund of a tax prohibited by EU law may be made only to the taxpayer who paid the tax and not — where the tax has not been refunded to the person who paid it — to subsequent purchasers of the vehicle in respect of which the tax was paid? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Does the interpretation of [Article] 110 TFEU preclude national rules, such as those laid down by Article 1 of OUG No 52/2017, under which a refund of a tax prohibited by EU law may be made only to the taxpayer who paid the tax and not — where the tax has not been refunded to the person who paid it — to subsequent purchasers of the vehicle in respect of which the tax was paid?

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         398,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,264,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (215,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                     302,329,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (35,343,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             279,334,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,242,000
<BONDS>                                    183,382,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        90,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  90,510,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               279,334,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            32,931,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               20,429,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          10,905,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,668,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (449,000)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,219,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 51 (Monday, March 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12604-12605]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6594]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Public Information Collection Requirement

AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.


[[Page 12605]]


ACTION: Notice of intent to renew information collection #3038-0018--
Information Concerning Warehouses.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commodity Futures Trading Commission is planning to renew 
information collection 3038-0018, Information Concerning Warehouses, 
which is due to expire on May 31, 1997. The collection enables the 
Commission to obtain information on the amount of a commodity available 
for delivery from approved contract markets who are required to file 
information concerning delivery notices issued and stopped and 
warehouses regular for delivery. In compliance with the Paperwork 
Reduction Act of 1995, the Commission solicits comments to:

    (1) Evaluate whether the collection of information is necessary 
for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including 
the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (2) evaluate 
the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the 
collection of information including the validity of the methodology 
and assumptions used; (3) enhance the quality, utility, and clarity 
of the information to be collected; and (4) minimize the burden of 
the collection of the information on those who are to respond, 
including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, 
mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other 
forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic 
submission of responses.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before May 16, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Persons wishing to comment on this information collection 
should contact the CFTC Clearance Officer, 1155 21st Street NW, 
Washington, DC 20581, (202) 418-5160.
    Title: Information Concerning Warehouses.
    Control Number: 3038-0018.
    Action: Extension.
    Respondents: Contract Markets.
    Estimated Annual Burden: 31 hours.

    Issued in Washington, D.C. on March 11, 1997.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 97-6594 Filed 3-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 50 (Friday, March 14, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 12159]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6465]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Draft Solicitation for Waste Acceptance and Transportation 
Services

AGENCY: Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, U.S. 
Department of Energy.

ACTION: Extension of comment period for Draft Solicitation for Waste 
Acceptance and Transportation Services.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (OCRWM) 
announced the availability of a Draft Request For Proposals (RFP) for 
Waste Acceptance and Transportation Services in the December 23, 1996 
Commerce Business Daily (Section V, Page 10) and in the December 27, 
1996 Federal Register (Vol. 61, #250, page 68250). The draft 
solicitation was made available by requesting a copy directly from the 
Contracting Officer and via the Internet on the OCRWM Home Page and the 
Headquarters Procurement Operations Home Page at the following 
addresses: http://www.rw.doe.gov/ and http://www.pr.doe.gov./
solicit.html, respectively.
    The announcement requested that comments regarding the RFP be 
submitted to the address listed below no later than March 31, 1997. 
This notice hereby extends that comment period until May 15, 1997. All 
comments should be sent to U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence 
Avenue, SW, Attn: Michelle Miskinis, HR-561.21, Washington, DC 20585.
    All comments received will be made available at the U.S. Department 
of Energy, Public Reading Room located at the above address, at the end 
of the comment period.

    Issued in Washington, D.C. on March 5, 1997.
Scott E. Sheffield,
Acting Associate Deputy Assistant, Secretary for Headquarters 
Procurement Operations.
[FR Doc. 97-6465 Filed 3-13-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
<PAGE>
 

                                  EXHIBIT 11
                   NUTRAMAX PRODUCTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                                  (UNAUDITED)

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
                                                              Thirteen Weeks   Thirteen Weeks     Twenty-Seven    Twenty-Six
                                                                  Ended            Ended          Weeks Ended     Weeks Ended
                                                              --------------   --------------     -------------   --------------
                                                               April 4, 1998   March 29, 1997     April 4, 1998   March 29, 1997
                                                              --------------   --------------     -------------   --------------
                                                                                   (share data in thousands)
<S>                                                           <C>              <C>                <C>             <C>
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE:
   Net income per common share                                      $   0.11         $   0.21          $   0.25         $   0.38
                                                              ==============   ==============     =============   ==============
   Weighted average number of shares outstanding                       5,648            4,845             5,634            6,780
                                                              ==============   ==============     =============   ==============
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE:
   Net income per common share                                      $   0.11         $   0.20          $   0.25         $   0.37
                                                              ==============   ==============     =============   ==============
   Weighted average shares                                             5,648            4,845             5,634            6,780
   Effect of dilutive securities:
     Stock options                                                        87               62                81               19
     Warrants                                                             82               55                78               18
                                                              --------------   --------------     -------------   --------------
   Adjusted weighted average number of shares outstanding              5,817            4,962             5,793            6,817
                                                              ==============   ==============     =============   ==============

</TABLE> 


                                      17
No. 11-564.

#### Florida *v.*Jardines.

Sup. Ct. Fla. [Certiorari granted, 565 U. S. 1104.] Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as *amicus curiae*and for divided argument granted.
# C_2023296EN.01001101.xml

| 21.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 296/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 296/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 July 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Dioikitiko Protodikeio Athinon — Greece) — Ethnikos Organismos Pistopoiisis Prosonton & Epangelmatikou Prosanatolismou (Eoppep) v Elliniko Dimosio

(Case C-404/22, (1) Ethnikos Organismos Pistopoiisis Prosonton & Epangelmatikou Prosanatolismou)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Information and consultation of workers - Directive 2002/14/EC - Scope - Meaning of ‘undertaking carrying out an economic activity’ - Private-law entity operating in the public sector - Removal of workers appointed to managerial positions - No prior information or consultation of employee representatives)

(2023/C 296/12)

Language of the case: Greek

Referring court

Dioikitiko Protodikeio Athinon

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Ethnikos Organismos Pistopoiisis Prosonton & Epangelmatikou Prosanatolismou (Eoppep)

Defendant: Elliniko Dimosio

Questions referred

| 1. | Article 2(a) of Directive 2002/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2002 establishing a general framework for informing and consulting employees in the European Community
  must be interpreted as meaning that that provision may refer to a legal person governed by private law which acts as a legal person governed by public law and exercises public powers where it also provides, for remuneration, services which are in competition with those provided by market operators. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Article 2(a) of Directive 2002/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2002 establishing a general framework for informing and consulting employees in the European Community

must be interpreted as meaning that that provision may refer to a legal person governed by private law which acts as a legal person governed by public law and exercises public powers where it also provides, for remuneration, services which are in competition with those provided by market operators.

| 2. | Article 4(2)(b) of Directive 2002/14
  must be interpreted as meaning that the information and consultation obligation laid down therein does not apply in the event of a change of post for a small number of employees appointed on an interim basis to management roles, where that change is not capable of affecting the situation, structure or probable development of employment within the undertaking concerned, or placing employment more generally under threat. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Article 4(2)(b) of Directive 2002/14

must be interpreted as meaning that the information and consultation obligation laid down therein does not apply in the event of a change of post for a small number of employees appointed on an interim basis to management roles, where that change is not capable of affecting the situation, structure or probable development of employment within the undertaking concerned, or placing employment more generally under threat.

---

(1)  OJ C 359, 19.9.2022.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY TO SUCH FORM.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         687,793
<SECURITIES>                                 1,002,977
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,804,016
<PP&E>                                          35,075
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,710
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,040,015
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          230,440
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,852,452
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,040,015
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               856,639
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,781
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (859,420)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (860,220)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (860,220)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)


</TABLE>
No. 11-10758.

#### Chavis *v.*New Jersey.

Super. Ct. N. J., App. Div. Certiorari denied.
**Exhibit
      23.1**











CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM







We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
      Form
      S-3 (File No. 333-124153) and Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-411113-99, 333-76424,
      333-84426, 333-103761, 33-125199) of Puget Energy, Inc. and on Form S-3 (File
      No. 333-124153-01) of Puget Sound Energy, Inc. of our reports dated February
      27,
      2006 relating to the consolidated financial statements, financial statement
      schedule, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
      financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial
      reporting of Puget Energy, Inc. and Puget Sound Energy, Inc., which appear
      in
      this combined Form 10-K.








/s/
      PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP





Seattle,
      Washington


February
      27, 2006
# C_2021502EN.01003101.xml

| 13.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 502/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 502/31

---

Action brought on 8 September 2021 — European Lotto and Betting v EUIPO — Tipp24 Services (Cash4Life)

(Case T-554/21)

(2021/C 502/48)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: European Lotto and Betting Ltd (Ocean Village, Gibraltar) (represented by: D. Egan, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Tipp24 Services Ltd (London, United Kingdom)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark Cash4Life — European Union trade mark No 15 065 964

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 July 2021 in Case R 264/2020-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO and Tipp24 to bear their own costs and pay those of European Lotto and Betting Ltd. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and Tipp24 to bear their own costs and pay those of European Lotto and Betting Ltd.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
# C_2022222EN.01002101.xml

| 7.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 222/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 222/21

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Bologna (Italy) lodged on 24 March 2022 — OV v Ministero Interno — Unità Dublino

(Case C-217/22)

(2022/C 222/31)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale ordinario di Bologna

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: OV

Defendant: Ministero Interno — Unità Dublino

Question referred

| 1. | Must Articles 4 and 5 of Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013, (1) particularly in view of the right to an effective remedy laid down in Article 27 of that regulation, be interpreted as meaning that the applicant, who has challenged before the courts of the requesting State the transfer decision adopted by the Dublin Unit of that State in the context of a take back procedure under Article 18(1)(b), is entitled to invoke the infringement by the requested State of the duty to provide information laid down in Article 4 or of the obligation to arrange a personal interview with the applicant under Article 5 of that regulation, and if the answer is in the affirmative, what is the relevance of such an infringement? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Must Articles 4 and 5 of Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013, (1) particularly in view of the right to an effective remedy laid down in Article 27 of that regulation, be interpreted as meaning that the applicant, who has challenged before the courts of the requesting State the transfer decision adopted by the Dublin Unit of that State in the context of a take back procedure under Article 18(1)(b), is entitled to invoke the infringement by the requested State of the duty to provide information laid down in Article 4 or of the obligation to arrange a personal interview with the applicant under Article 5 of that regulation, and if the answer is in the affirmative, what is the relevance of such an infringement?

---

(1)  Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national or a stateless person (OJ 2013 L 180, p. 31).

---