alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2022441EN.01001402.xml

| 21.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 441/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 441/14

---

Appeal brought on 25 August 2022 by ZA against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 15 June 2022 in Case T-545/16, YY and ZA v Court of Justice of the European Union

(Case C-570/22 P)

(2022/C 441/20)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: ZA (represented by: L. Levi, J.-N. Louis, avocats)

Other parties to the proceedings: Court of Justice of the European Union, YY, European Parliament, Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:

| — | set aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 15 June 2022 in Case T-545/16, YY and ZA v Court of Justice; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 15 June 2022 in Case T-545/16, YY and ZA v Court of Justice;

| — | refer the present case to the Court of Justice for a ruling that the appellant’s action at first instance is well founded; |
| --- | --- |

—

refer the present case to the Court of Justice for a ruling that the appellant’s action at first instance is well founded;

| — | order the defendant at first instance to pay all of the costs at first instance and on appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant at first instance to pay all of the costs at first instance and on appeal.

Grounds of appeal and main arguments

In support of his appeal, the appellant relies on two grounds:

The first ground of appeal alleges infringement of Article 45 TFEU, infringement by the General Court of its obligation to state reasons, error of legal characterisation and distortion of the contents of the file;

The second ground of appeal alleges infringement of the purpose of Article 8 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union and breach of the general principle of proportionality.

---
# C_2023134EN.01001601.xml

| 17.4.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 134/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 134/16

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 February 2023 — Deutsche Bank v EUIPO Operación y Auditoria (avanza Tu negocio)

(Case T-341/22) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark avanza Tu negocio - Earlier national figurative mark Avanza Credit de Deutsche Bank - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2023/C 134/21)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Deutsche Bank, SA Española (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: I. Valdelomar Serrano, J.-L. Rodriguez Fuensalida, P. Ramells Higueras and A. Figuerola Moure, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: R. Raponi, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Operación y Auditoria, SA de CV, SOFOM, ENR (Mexico City, Mexico)

Re:

By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks, in essence, annulment and alteration of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 23 March 2022 (Case R 1808/2021-5), relating to opposition proceedings between the applicant and Operación y Auditoria, SA de CV, SOFOM, ENR.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Deutsche Bank, SA Española to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Deutsche Bank, SA Española to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 294, 1.8.2022.

---
1/5/2011 Page 1 of 13 

INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT (IRExR) 

 Chemical ID: P-11-0115 Reviewer: Cinalli/SD 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 13
1/5/2011 Page 2 of 13 

 INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT 

Chemical ID: P-11-0115 Assessor: Cinalli/SD 

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 13
1/5/2011 Page 3 of 13 

INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT 

Chemical ID: P-11-0115 

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 13
1/5/2011 Page 4 of 13 

EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 13
1/5/2011 Page 5 of 13 

 INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT 

Chemical ID: P-11-0115 Assessor: Cinalli/SD 

EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 13
1/5/2011 Page 6 of 13 

INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT 

Chemical ID: P-11-0115 

EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 13
1/5/2011 Page 7 of 13 

EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 13
1/5/2011 Page 8 of 13 

 INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT 

Chemical ID: P-11-0115 Assessor: Cinalli/SD 

EPA SANITIZED Page 8 of 13
1/5/2011 Page 9 of 13 

INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT 

Chemical ID: P-11-0115 

EPA SANITIZED Page 9 of 13
1/5/2011 Page 10 of 13 

EPA SANITIZED Page 10 of 13
1/5/2011 Page 11 of 13 

 INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT 

Chemical ID: P-11-0115 Assessor: Cinalli/SD 

EPA SANITIZED Page 11 of 13
1/5/2011 Page 12 of 13 

INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT 

Chemical ID: P-11-0115 

EPA SANITIZED Page 12 of 13
1/5/2011 Page 13 of 13 

EPA SANITIZED Page 13 of 13
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8999 

To require the speeches and schedules of the heads of executive agencies 

to be made publicly available, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 17, 2020 

Mr. BEYER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To require the speeches and schedules of the heads of executive agencies to be made publicly available, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Transparent Leader5 ship Act of 2020’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PUBLIC AVAILABILITY OF SPEECHES AND SCHED7 ULES OF HEADS OF EXECUTIVE AGENCIES. 

8 (a) PUBLIC AVAILABILITY OF SPEECHES.— 

9 (1) SPEECHES GIVEN DURING COVERED PE10 RIOD.—With respect to a speech given by the head 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8999 IH

1 of an executive agency during the covered period, a 

2 copy of such speech shall be publicly available not 

3 later than 6 months after the date of the enactment 

4 of this Act. 

5 (2) SPEECHES GIVEN AFTER DATE OF ENACT6 MENT.—With respect to a speech given by the head 

7 of an executive agency after the date of the enact8 ment of this Act, a copy of such speech shall be pub9 licly available not later than 30 days after the date 

10 on which such speech is given. 

11 (b) PUBLIC AVAILABILITY OF SCHEDULES.— 

12 (1) SCHEDULES FOR DATE DURING COVERED

13 PERIOD.—With respect to a schedule of the head of 

14 an executive agency for a date occurring during the 

15 covered period, a copy of such schedule shall be pub16 licly published not later than 6 months after the 

17 date of the enactment of this Act. 

18 (2) SCHEDULES FOR DATE AFTER DATE OF EN19 ACTMENT.—With respect to a schedule of the head 

20 of an executive agency for a date occurring after the 

21 date of the enactment of this Act, a copy of such 

22 schedule shall be publicly published not later than 

23 30 days after such date. 

24 (c) DEFINITIONS.—In this Act: 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 8999 IH

1 (1) COVERED PERIOD.—The term ‘‘covered pe2 riod’’ means the period beginning on January 20, 

3 2017 and ending on the date of the enactment of 

4 this Act. 

5 (2) EXECUTIVE AGENCY.—The term ‘‘executive 

6 agency’’ means an agency, department, or instru7 mentality in the executive branch of the Federal 

8 Government. 

9 (3) HEAD OF AN EXECUTIVE AGENCY.—The 

10 term ‘‘head of an executive agency’’ includes, with 

11 respect to the United States Postal Service, the 

12 Postmaster General and the Deputy Postmaster 

13 General. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Post-Effective
Amendment No. 1 on Form S-8 to Registration Statement No. 333-11329 on Form S-4
of Houston Industries Incorporated ("New HII", formerly named Houston Lighting &
Power Company) of our reports dated February 21, 1997, appearing in the Annual
Reports on Form 10-K of New HII and Old HII (formerly named Houston Industries
Incorporated) for the year ended December 31, 1996 and of our report dated June
24, 1997, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 11-K of the Old HII Savings
Plan for the year ended December 31, 1996.


DELOITTE & TOUCHE, LLP
Houston, Texas

August 7, 1997
# C_2022463EN.01004802.xml

| 5.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 463/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 463/48

---

Order of the General Court of 5 October 2022 — Airoldi Metalli v Commission

(Case T-1/22) (1)

(Action for annulment - Dumping - Imports of aluminium flat-rolled products originating in China - Imposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty - Importer - Regulatory act entailing implementing measures - Act not of individual concern - Inadmissibility)

(2022/C 463/70)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Airoldi Metalli SpA (Molteno, Italy) (represented by: M. Campa, D. Rovetta, P. Gjørtler and V. Villante, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. Gustafsson and G. Luengo, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1784 of 8 October 2021 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty imposed on imports of aluminium flat-rolled products originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ 2021 L 359, p. 6).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | Airoldi Metalli SpA shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Airoldi Metalli SpA shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

| 3. | European Aluminium shall bear its own costs relating to its application for leave to intervene. |
| --- | --- |

3.

European Aluminium shall bear its own costs relating to its application for leave to intervene.

---

(1)  OJ C 84, 21.2.2022.

---
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING 

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED 

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL 

OF FLORIDA 

SECOND DISTRICT 

TRICIA ANN WALTER, as Personal ) 

Representative of the Estate of Norine C. ) 

Walter, ) 

 ) 

 Petitioner, ) 

 ) 

v. ) Case No. 2D15-2467 

 ) 

SUNRISE SENIOR LIVING SERVICES, ) 

INC., d/b/a BRIGHTON GARDENS OF ) 

TAMPA; JAI LARMAN; and CARLA ) 

RUSSO, ) 

 ) 

 Respondents. ) 

 ) 

Opinion filed July 22, 2015. 

Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit 

Court for Hillsborough County; William P. 

Levens, Judge. 

Thomas A. Burns of Burns, P.A., Tampa; 

and G. William Lazenby, IV, of Mac A. 

Greco, Jr., P.A., Tampa, for Petitioner. 

Ronald E. Bush of Bush, Graziano & Rice, 

Tampa, for Respondents. 

ALTENBERND, Judge. 

 The Personal Representative of the Estate of Norine C. Walter seeks 

certiorari review of an order striking her request for trial by jury in an action alleging that 

the negligence of employees or agents of Sunrise Senior Living Services, Inc., resulted 
- 2 - 

in personal injury to or the wrongful death of Norine Walter. The trial court struck the 

request for trial by jury based on the express waiver of trial by jury in the nursing facility 

residency agreement signed by Norine Walter. Although the petition for writ of certiorari 

contains citations to many legal authorities, it fails to cite to Jaye v. Royal Saxon, Inc., 

720 So. 2d 214 (Fla. 1998), which holds that an order striking a demand for trial by jury 

is not reviewable by certiorari. Thus, if the Personal Representative believes that she is 

aggrieved by this order after the conclusion of a nonjury trial, she is free to raise this 

issue on direct appeal. 

 The petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed. 

CRENSHAW and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
# C_2023338EN.01001902.xml

| 25.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 338/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 338/19

---

Judgment of the General Court of 26 July 2023 — Pšonka v Council

(Case T-243/22) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken having regard to the situation in Ukraine - Freezing of funds - List of persons, entities and bodies subject to freezing of funds and economic resources - Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list - Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection)

(2023/C 338/25)

Language of the case: Czech

Parties

Applicant: Artem Viktorovyč Pšonka (Kramatorsk, Ukraine) (represented by: M. Mleziva, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Vobořil, R. Pekař and A. Boggio-Tomasaz, acting as Agents)

Re:

By his action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/376 of 3 March 2022, amending Decision 2014/119/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2022 L 70, p. 7), and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/375 of 3 March 2022 implementing Council Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine, (OJ 2022 L 70, p. 1), in so far as those measures maintain his name on the list of persons, entities and bodies subject to those restrictive measures.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/376 of 3 March 2022, amending Decision 2014/119/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine, and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/375 of 3 March 2022 implementing Council Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine, in so far as the name of Artem Viktorovych Pšonka was maintained on the list of persons, entities and bodies subject to those restrictive measures; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/376 of 3 March 2022, amending Decision 2014/119/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine, and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/375 of 3 March 2022 implementing Council Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine, in so far as the name of Artem Viktorovych Pšonka was maintained on the list of persons, entities and bodies subject to those restrictive measures;

| 2. | Orders the Council of the European Union to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Council of the European Union to pay the costs.

---

(1)  
  OJ C 244, 27.6.2022.

---
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

February 15, 2023

No. 04

- 23

- 00055

- CR

IN RE Rigoberto Gamboa MOLINA

Original Proceeding 1

ORDER

On January 30, 2023, r elator filed a motion to dismiss his petition for writ of mandamus

. We GRANT the motion and DISMISS the petition for writ of mandamus . The stay imposed on

January 13, 2023 is LIFTED

.

It is so ORDERED on February 15, 2023

.

_____________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 15th day of February, 2023

.

_____________________________ Michael A. Cruz

, Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 11370CR , styled State of Texas v. Rigoberto Gamboa Molina , pending in

the County Court

, Kinney County, Texas, the Honorable Todd A lexander Blomerth presiding.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated condensed financial statements of American Restaurant Partners,
L.P. at September 28, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-28-1999
<CASH>                                          644274
<SECURITIES>                                      2961
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1034762
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     457824
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1997783
<PP&E>                                        36326721
<DEPRECIATION>                                16270156
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                30647121
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         12011942
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (6329097)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  30647121
<SALES>                                       43378237
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              43378237
<CGS>                                         11620571
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 40368662
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2316843
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 559263
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             559263
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    559263
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .16


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant
to Section 906

Of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned
officers of Rand Capital Corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 (the Form10-K) of the Company fully complies with the
requirement of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |                                                   
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 17, 2014 |  | 
|                      |  | 
|                      |  |  |  | LOGO                                              
|                      |  |  |  | Allen F. Grum, President
(Chief Executive Officer)



|                      |  |  |  |                                                         
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 17, 2014 |  | 
|                      |  | 
|                      |  |  |  | LOGO                                                    
|                      |  |  |  | Daniel P. Penberthy, Treasurer (Chief Financial Officer)



61
Submitted April 5,

appeal dismissed May 10,

petition for review allowed September 14, 2017 (361 Or 885)

#### In the Matter of A. B. B., a Child. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, *Petitioner-Respondent, v.*T. J. D. J., *Appellant.*In the Matter of A. B. B., a Child. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, *Petitioner-Respondent, v.*T. J. D. J., *Appellant.*In the Matter of A. B. B., a Child. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, *Petitioner-Respondent, v.*T. J. D. J., *Appellant.*

Marion County Circuit Court

Marion County Circuit Court

Marion County Circuit Court

J140737; A163536 (Control)

J140784; A163537

15JU00035; A163538

393 P3d 1207

*504Shannon Storey, Chief Defender, Juvenile Appellate Section, and Valerie Colas, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant.

Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Erin K. Galli, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Egan, Presiding Judge, and Lagesen, Judge, and Linder, Senior Judge.

*505PER CURIAM

Father appeals review judgments under ORS 419B.449 in juvenile dependency proceedings that are subject to the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA). He assigns error to the juvenile court’s determination in those judgments that DHS has made “active efforts” to return his child to the care of her family. *See*ORS 419B.340(1) (requiring juvenile court to assess whether DHS has made “active efforts” to permit a child to stay in, or return to, child’s home in certain orders in dependency cases subject to ICWA). In *Dept. of Human Services v. A. B. B.,*285 Or App 409, 396 P3d 306 (2017), decided today, we dismissed an appeal by child from the same judgments, concluding that, under *State ex rel Juv. Dept. v. Vockrodt,*147 Or App 4, 8, 934 P2d 620 (1997), child’s rights were not sufficiently affected by the judgments to render them appealable under ORS 419A.200(1). For substantially the same reasons as those we articulated in *A. B. B.,*we conclude that the judgments are not appealable by father.

Appeal dismissed.
No. 11-10282.

#### Smith *v.*Illinois.

App. Ct. Ill., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.