alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
12
 
 
 **PUBLIC
SERVICE COMPANY OF OKLAHOMA**
 **Computation
of Consolidated Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges**
 **(in
thousands except ratio data)**
 
 **Year
      Ended December 31,****2000**
    
    **2001**
    
    **2002**
    
    **2003**
    
    **2004****FIXED
      CHARGES**Interest
      on Long-term Debt
    
    $
    26,473
    
    $
    29,305
    
    $
    28,401
    
    $
    39,631
    
    $
    35,152Interest
      on Short-term Debt
    
    
    10,902
    
    
    9,513
    
    
    6,508
    
    
    2,511
    
    
    3,021Distributions
      on Trust Preferred Securities
    
    
    6,000
    
    
    6,000
    
    
    6,000
    
    
    3,000
    
    
    -Estimated
      Interest Element in Lease Rentals
    
    
    1,090
    
    
    1,337
    
    
    1,468
    
    
    1,645
    
    
    1,300Total
      Fixed Charges
    
    $
    44,465
    
    $
    46,155
    
    $
    42,377
    
    $
    46,787
    
    $
    39,473**EARNINGS**Net
      Income
    
    $
    66,663
    
    $
    57,759
    
    $
    41,060
    
    $
    53,891
    
    $
    37,542Plus
      Federal Income Taxes
    
    
    8,571
    
    
    45,484
    
    
    (43,956
    )
    
    47,581
    
    
    (12,145
    )Plus
      State Income Taxes
    
    
    1,721
    
    
    8,928
    
    
    (7,529
    )
    
    6,688
    
    
    (289
    )Plus
      Provision for Deferred Income Taxes
    
    
    25,453
    
    
    (17,751
    )
    
    75,659
    
    
    (14,641
    )
    
    22,034Plus
      Deferred Investment Tax Credits
    
    
    (1,791
    )
    
    (1,791
    )
    
    (1,791
    )
    
    (1,790
    )
    
    (1,791
    )Plus
      Fixed Charges
    
    
    44,465
    
    
    46,155
    
    
    42,377
    
    
    46,787
    
    
    39,473**Total
      Earnings**
    
    $
    145,082
    
    $
    138,784
    
    $
    105,820
    
    $
    138,516
    
    $
    84,824Ratio
      of Earnings to Fixed Charges
    
    
    3.26
    
    
    3.00
    
    
    2.49
    
    
    2.96
    
    
    2.14
 
  * Certain
amounts have been reclassified between Distributions on Trust Preferred
Securities and Interest on Long-term Debt due to the implementation of FIN 46R
"Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities" effective March 31, 2004, on a
prospective basis. This reclassification had no effect on this ratio.
No. 11-10576.

#### Harding *v.*Osborn, Judge, Circuit Court of Virginia, 10th Judicial Circuit.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 46 (Monday, March 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 10856]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5762]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. Once the application has been accepted 
for processing, it will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 
1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the acquisition of a nonbanking 
company, the review also includes whether the acquisition of the 
nonbanking company complies with the standards in section 4 of the BHC 
Act. Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted 
throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than April 3, 1997.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (James A. Bluemle, Vice 
President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1413:
    1. ABC Employee Stock Ownership Plan, Anchor, Illinois; to acquire 
through a redemption of stock, an additional 18.23 percent, for a total 
of 59.31 percent, of the voting shares of Anchor Bancorporation, Inc., 
Anchor, Illinois, and thereby indirectly acquire Anchor State Bank, 
Anchor, Illinois.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 4, 1997.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-5762 Filed 3-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****    - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский 

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

        - Student Loans
        - Grants
        - Laws
        - Data

# 영어 미숙자를  위한 공고

# 영어 미숙자를  위한 공고

                                    -        민권사무실
영어를 이해하는 데 어려움이 있으신 경우, 교육부 정보 센터에 일반인 대상 언어 지원 서비스를 요청하실 수 있습니다. 이러한 언어 지원 서비스는 무료로 제공됩니다. 통역이나 번역 서비스에 대해 자세한 정보가 필요하신 경우, 전화번호 1-800-USA-LEARN (1-800-872-5327) , 또는 청각 장애인용 전화번호 (800) 877-8339 TTY / ASCII (American Standard Code For Information Interchange) 또는 이메일주소 Ed.Language.Assistance@ed.gov 으로 연락하시기 바랍니다.

또는 아래의 주소로 편지를 보내시기 바랍니다.

U.S. Department of Education Information Resource CenterLBJ Education Building400 Maryland Ave., S.W.Washington, DC 20202
             How Do I Find...?    - Student loans, forgiveness
- Higher Education Rulemaking
- College accreditation
- Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
- FERPA
- FAFSA
- 1098, tax forms
- More...
      Information About...    - Elevating Teaching
- Early Learning
- Engage Every Student
- Unlocking Career Success
- Cybersecurity
             
*Our mission* is to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness by fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access.
- Student Loans
- Repaying Loans
- Defaulted Loans
- Loan Forgiveness
- Loan Servicers
- Grants & Programs
- Apply for Pell Grants
- Grants Forecast
- Apply for a Grant
- Laws & Guidance
- Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
- FERPA
- Civil Rights
- IDEA Website
- Data & Research
- Education Statistics
- Postsecondary Education Data
- ED Data Express
- Nation's Report Card
- What Works Clearinghouse
- Open Data Platform
- COVID Relief Data
- About Us
- Contact Us
- ED Offices
- Jobs
- Press Releases
- FAQs
- Recursos en español
- Budget, Performance
- Privacy Program
- Homeroom Blog
- Notices
- FOIA
- Privacy Policy
- Accessibility
- Security
- Information Quality
- Inspector General
- Whitehouse.gov
- USA.gov
- Benefits.gov
- Regulations.gov
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

______________________________

No. 06-10-00073-CR

______________________________

ROY CHESTER BROWN, JR., Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

 

On Appeal from the 8th Judicial District Court

Hopkins County, Texas

Trial Court No. 0921248

 

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Roy Chester Brown, Jr., was convicted of burglary of a habitation and was sentenced to 

thirty years’ incarceration. On appeal, he argues that his conviction should be reversed and 

remanded since he “was not present during his trial on the merits due to injuries he had received.” 

We will affirm the trial court’s judgment. 

Even though the issue is not clearly stated as such, we interpret Brown’s argument to allege 

that the trial court erred in failing to grant a continuance.1The evidence shows that Brown was 

present for the commencement of the trial when the jury was selected, but failed to appear for the 

trial one week later. The trial court overruled an oral motion for continuance, and the case was 

tried to the jury. 

When a defendant voluntarily absents himself or herself after pleading to the indictment or 

after the jury has been selected, the trial may proceed to its conclusion. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC.

ANN. art. 33.03 (Vernon 2006). After a warrant was issued for Brown’s arrest, he was present for

the sentencing hearing. 

Brown’s only argument is that he was unable to attend the trial due to injuries. He equates 

that situation to a defense in a bail jumping trial and urges that he had a reasonable excuse for 

failing to appear. It is a defense to the charge of bail jumping that the defendant had a reasonable 

excuse for his or her failure to appear. TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. 38.10(c) (Vernon 2003). Since 

this is not a bail jumping case, that statutory defense is not available. Further, there is no evidence 

 

1The State has failed to file a brief, even though we granted the State’s motion for an extension. 
3

of Brown’s injuries. Finally, a motion for continuance must be written showing sufficient cause; 

the trial court’s denial of an unsworn, unwritten motion for continuance presents nothing for 

appellate review. Dewberry v. State, 4 S.W.3d 735, 756 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). 

We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Jack Carter

Justice

Date Submitted: February 16, 2011

Date Decided: February 17, 2011

Do Not Publish
# C_2023155EN.01005401.xml

| 2.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/54

---

Judgment of the General Court of 8 March 2023 — Amisi Kumba v Council

(Case T-92/22) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo - Freezing of funds - Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States - Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered - Right to be heard - Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded - Manifest error of assessment - Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures)

(2023/C 155/69)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Gabriel Amisi Kumba (Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo) (represented by: T. Bontinck, P. De Wolf, A. Guillerme and T. Payan, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: B. Driessen and M.-C. Cadilhac, acting as Agents)

Re:

By his action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment, first, of Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/2181 of 9 December 2021 amending Decision 2010/788/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic Republic of the Congo (OJ 2021 L 443, p. 75) and, second, of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2177 of 9 December 2021, implementing Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against persons acting in violation of the arms embargo with regard to the Democratic Republic of the Congo (OJ 2021 L 443, p. 3), in so far as those acts concern him.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Gabriel Amisi Kumba to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Gabriel Amisi Kumba to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 148, 4.4.2022.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF NORTHLAND CRANBERRIES, INC.
AS OF AND FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED FEBRUARY 29, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              AUG-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 SEP-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   FEB-29-2000
<CASH>                                         62
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  29,501
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (729)
<INVENTORY>                                    107,150
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               144,681
<PP&E>                                         212,276
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (42,137)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 357,656
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          (48,734)
<BONDS>                                        (170,495)
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       (203)
<OTHER-SE>                                     (138,224)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   (357,656)
<SALES>                                        143,588
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               143,588
<CGS>                                          124,596
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  46,547
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             6,403
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (33,958)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (13,244)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (20,714)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (20,714)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (1.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (1.02)


</TABLE>
# C_2021368EN.01002501.xml

| 13.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 368/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 368/25

---

Action brought on 2 July 2021 — ZR v EUIPO

(Case T-400/21)

(2021/C 368/41)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: ZR (represented by: S. Rodrigues and A. Champetier, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the EUIPO rejecting the applicant’s application for transfer from the European Commission to the EUIPO; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the EUIPO rejecting the applicant’s application for transfer from the European Commission to the EUIPO;

| — | annul, insofar as necessary, the decision to reject the applicant’s complaint filed under Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul, insofar as necessary, the decision to reject the applicant’s complaint filed under Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations;

| — | order the defendant to bear the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to bear the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging a breach of Articles 4, 8, 27, 29 and 110 of Staff Regulations and of the principles of continuity of EU officials, of the comparison of merits and of transparency; |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging a breach of Articles 4, 8, 27, 29 and 110 of Staff Regulations and of the principles of continuity of EU officials, of the comparison of merits and of transparency;

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging a breach of the principle of equal treatment; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging a breach of the principle of equal treatment;

| 3. | Third plea in law, alleging a breach of the duty to state reasons and the duty of care, resulting in a manifest error of appreciation. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Third plea in law, alleging a breach of the duty to state reasons and the duty of care, resulting in a manifest error of appreciation.

---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 42 (Tuesday, March 4, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 9762]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5219]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Project No. 1494-118]


Grand River Dam Authority; Notice of Availability of 
Environmental Assessment

February 26, 1997.
    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's regulations, 18 CFR Part 
380 (Order No. 486, 52 F.R. 47910), the Office of Hydropower Licensing 
(OHL) reviewed the application for non-project use of project lands for 
the Pensacola Hydroelectric Project. The application proposes to 
excavate approximately 15,000 to 20,000 cubic yards of shoreline and 
lake bottom material from the Grand Lake O' the Cherokees, in Delaware 
County, Oklahoma, in order to raise the applicant's property and access 
road to elevation 757 feet Pensacola Datum to prevent flooding and 
retain access to the site during high water. The staff prepared an 
Environmental Assessment (EA) for the action. In the EA, staff 
concludes that approval of the non-project use of project lands would 
not constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the 
quality of the human environment.
    Copies of the EA are available for review in the Reference and 
Information Center, Room 1A, of the Commission's offices at 888 First 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-5219 Filed 3-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT 99



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Robert W. OBrien, director and president of Quad Metals Corporation (the Registrant) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

This Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Registrant for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

Date:  February 17, 2003

/s/ Robert W. OBrien

Robert W. OBrien

President and Director
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 45 (Friday, March 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 10568]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5690]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Notice of Meeting of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission 
(NBAC), Genetics Subcommittee

    Correction notice for previously published notice (Published on 
February 26, 1997, Page 8743, 2nd Column). The date is corrected to 
read: Date: Wednesday, March 5, 1997, 7:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Henrietta Hyatt-Knorr, National 
Bioethics Advisory Commission, MSC-7508, 6100 Executive Boulevard, 
Suite 3C01, Rockville, Maryland 20892-7508, telephone 301-402-4242, fax 
number 301-480-6900.

    Dated: February 26, 1997.
Henrietta Hyatt-Knorr,
Acting Deputy Director, National Bioethics Advisory Commission.
[FR Doc. 97-5690 Filed 3-4-97; 2:25 pm]
BILLING CODE 4160-17-M
```
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 10, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40737

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

PlaintiffAppellee,

versus

JAMES MATTHEW POOLE,

DefendantAppellant.

-------------------------------------------------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:05-CR-96-ALL

------------------------------------------------------------

Before DeMOSS, STEWART and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

James Matthew Poole pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation

of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 924(e), he received an enhanced sentence of 180

months of imprisonment, to be followed by a three-year term of supervised release. 

Poole argues that the district court erred in counting his four prior burglary convictions as

separate offenses for purposes of § 924(e). The district court did not so err. See United States v.
-2-

White, 465 F.3d 250, 253 (5th Cir. 2006), cert. denied, 127 S. Ct. 1167 (2007); United States v.

Medina-Gutierrez, 980 F.2d 980, 982-83 (5th Cir. 1992). 

AFFIRMED.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8888 

To amend the Overtime Pay for Protective Services Act of 2016 to extend 

the Secret Service overtime pay exception through 2025, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 7, 2020 

Mr. KATKO (for himself and Mrs. WATSON COLEMAN) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To amend the Overtime Pay for Protective Services Act 

of 2016 to extend the Secret Service overtime pay exception through 2025, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Secret Service Over5 time Pay Extension Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8888 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF OVERTIME PAY EXCEPTION 

2 THROUGH 2020 FOR PROTECTIVE SERVICES. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2 of the Overtime Pay for 

4 Protective Services Act of 2016 (5 U.S.C. 5547 note) is 

5 amended— 

6 (1) in the section heading, by striking ‘‘2020’’ 

7 and inserting ‘‘2025’’; 

8 (2) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘or 2020’’ and 

9 inserting ‘‘2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, or 2025’’; 

10 and 

11 (3) in subsection (b)(1), by striking ‘‘and 

12 2020’’ and inserting ‘‘2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 

13 2024, and 2025’’. 

14 (b) REPORT ON EXTENSIONS.—Not later than Janu15 ary 30 of each of calendar years 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 

16 and 2026, the Director of the Secret Service shall submit 

17 to the Committees on Appropriations of the House of Rep18 resentatives and the Senate, the Committee on Homeland 

19 Security and the Committee on Oversight and Reform of 

20 the House of Representatives, and the Committee on 

21 Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Sen22 ate a report on the effects of the amendments made by 

23 subsection (a). The report shall include, with respect to 

24 the previous calendar year, the information described 

25 under paragraphs (1) through (7) of section 2(c) of Public 

26 Law 115–160. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 8888 IH

1 (c) REPEAL OF SUPERSEDED REPORTING REQUIRE2 MENT.—Section 2(b) of the Secret Service Overtime Pay 

3 Extension Act (Public Law 115–383; 132 Stat. 5121) is 

4 repealed. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS