alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2023127EN.01004001.xml

| 11.4.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 127/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.4.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 127/40

---

Order of the General Court of 14 February 2023 — Laboratorios Ern v EUIPO — Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals (TRiM)

(Case T-428/22) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Word mark TRiM - Earlier national word marks RYM - Expiry of the international registration - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

(2023/C 127/51)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Laboratorios Ern, SA (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: S. Correa Rodríguez, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Ringelhann and T. Frydendahl, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Pasadena, California, United States)

Re:

By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant, proprietor of the earlier Spanish word marks RYM, seeks annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 12 April 2022 (Case R 1158/2021-2), which rejected its opposition brought against protection within the European Union of international registration No 1411062, relating to the word sign TRiM of the other party to the proceedings before EUIPO, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | Each party shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Each party shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 326, 29.8.2022.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                                          0000818674                       
<NAME>                                         Intellicall, Inc. 
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1
<CASH>                                                  25
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        7,889
<ALLOWANCES>                                        (3,053)
<INVENTORY>                                          4,549
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       722 
<PP&E>                                               8,386  
<DEPRECIATION>                                      (7,068)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      18,152
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                5,773
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               121
<OTHER-SE>                                           3,697
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        18,152
<SALES>                                              4,831
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     7,989
<CGS>                                                4,269
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        7,537
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     2,170
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      (246)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    (469)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (2,229)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (2,229)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (2,229)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.19)
        


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 50 (Friday, March 14, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 12164]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6445]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Project No. 11547-000 Connecticut]


Summit Hydropower; Notice of Availability of Draft Environmental 
Assessment

March 10, 1997.
    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission's) 
regulations, 18 CFR Part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 F.R. 47897), the Office 
of Hydropower Licensing has reviewed the application for minor license 
for the proposed Hale Project located on the Quinebaug River in the 
Town of Putnam, Windham County, Connecticut, and has prepared a Draft 
Environmental Assessment (DEA) for the proposed project. In the DEA, 
the Commission's staff has analyzed the potential environmental impacts 
of the proposed project and has concluded that approval of the proposed 
project, with appropriate mitigative measures, would not constitute a 
major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human 
environment.
    Copies of the DEA are available for review in the Public Reference 
Branch of the Commission's offices at 888 First Street, N.W., 
Washington, D.C. 20426.
    Comments should be filed within 30 days from the date of this 
notice and should be addressed to Lois D. Cashell, Secretary, Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 
20426. Please affix Project No. 11547-000 to all comments. For further 
information, please contact Rainer Feller, Environmental Assessment 
Coordinator, at (202) 219-2796.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-6445 Filed 3-13-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 Certification Pursuant To Section 1350 Of Chapter 63 Of 18 U.S.C.
As Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002/SEC Rule 13a-14(b)
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated: May 11, 2007
    /s/ Michael K. GreenMichael K. GreenChief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-29-1997
<CASH>                                           6,395
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,996
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,861
<INVENTORY>                                      6,929
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,240
<PP&E>                                          30,231
<DEPRECIATION>                                  21,406
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  35,731
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,671
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            14
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,060
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    35,731
<SALES>                                         13,636
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,636
<CGS>                                           12,240
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,240
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,504
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (8)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,100)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (11,100)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (11,100)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.80)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.80)
        

</TABLE>
No. 11-10527.

#### Morris *v.*Chavez, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# C_2022119EN.01005001.xml

| 14.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 119/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 119/50

---

Action brought on 10 January 2022 — uwe JetStream GmbH/EUIPO (JET STREAM)

(Case T-14/22)

(2022/C 119/71)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: uwe JetStream GmbH (Schwäbisch Gmünd, Germany) (represented by: J. Schneider, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the word mark ‘JET STREAM’ — Application for registration No 20 809 111

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 9 November 2021 in Case R 1092/2021-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | set aside the contested decision, as well as the first instance EUIPO decision of 15 December 2020 and of 29 April 2021; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the contested decision, as well as the first instance EUIPO decision of 15 December 2020 and of 29 April 2021;

| — | allow the extension of the protection of international registration No 0809111 for the purposes of its registration in the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

—

allow the extension of the protection of international registration No 0809111 for the purposes of its registration in the European Union;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
No. 11-10368.

#### Boulds *v.*Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
1

Damberg, Rich

From: Brachtl, Megan

Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 4:51 PM

To: Szabo, Aaron

Cc: Ling, Michael; Damberg, Rich; Frey, Nathan J.

Subject: EPA responses to additional interagency comments on PM2.5 NAAQS Implementation 

NPRM

Attachments: EPA Response 2 to Interagency Comments on RIN 2060-AQ48 PM2.5 NAAQS Impl rule 

NPRM 02-13-15.pdf

Importance: High

Aaron – Attached please find EPA’s responses to the second set of interagency comments on the draft Notice of

Proposed Rulemaking for the PM2.5 NAAQS State Implementation Plan (SIP) Requirements.

Please let me know if you have any questions. We look forward to talking with you next week.  

Best regards,

Megan

Megan V. Brachtl, Group Leader

State and Local Programs Group

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

(919) 541‐2648

brachtl.megan@epa.gov
# C_2023296EN.01004501.xml

| 21.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 296/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 296/45

---

Order of the General Court of 4 July 2023 — Cristescu v Commission

(Case T-590/22) (1)

(2023/C 296/51)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Tenth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 424, 7.11.2022.

---
# C_2022482EN.01000802.xml

| 19.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 482/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 482/8

---

Appeal brought on 23 September 2022 by HV and HW against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 13 July 2022 in Case T-864/19, AI and Others v ECDC

(Case C-615/22 P)

(2022/C 482/12)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellants: HV and HW (represented by: L. Levi and A. Champetier, avocates)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control,

AI and HY

Form of order sought

The appellants claim that the Court should:

| — | Set aside the judgment under appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

Set aside the judgment under appeal.

| — | Declare the appeal brought before the General Court to be well-founded insofar as it requested the annulment of the decision dated 11 February 2019 rejecting the appellants’ request for compensation of 11 October 2018, annul, if need be, the decision dated 10 September 2019 rejecting the appellants’ complaint of 10 May 2019 and award the appellants the payment of financial compensation for the material and moral prejudice they sustained. |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare the appeal brought before the General Court to be well-founded insofar as it requested the annulment of the decision dated 11 February 2019 rejecting the appellants’ request for compensation of 11 October 2018, annul, if need be, the decision dated 10 September 2019 rejecting the appellants’ complaint of 10 May 2019 and award the appellants the payment of financial compensation for the material and moral prejudice they sustained.

| — | Award the reimbursement of the appellants’ incurred legal costs for both proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Award the reimbursement of the appellants’ incurred legal costs for both proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Breach of the principle of the duty of assistance as defined by Article 24 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union read or not in conjunction with the Manual for ECDC Confidential Counsellors. Error in law when defining the scope of such duty in the absence of a formal request for assistance. Breach of the duty to ensure healthy, safe and dignified working conditions.

Error in the legal characterisation of the facts by deciding that the elements of the file did not entail an obligation for the Defendant to provide assistance. Distortion of the facts and evidence.

---
No. 11-10066.

#### Haile *v.*Santa Rosa Memorial Hospital et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1999
<CASH>                                         472,400
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,460,134
<ALLOWANCES>                                    72,720
<INVENTORY>                                  1,533,044
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,557,296
<PP&E>                                       2,794,040
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,081,303
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,449,784
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,517,136
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        43,541
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,449,784
<SALES>                                     15,789,291
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,916,407
<CGS>                                       11,374,471
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,518,738
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,715,659
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,111
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (317,990)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (58,097)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (273,004)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (273,004)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
PAGE <1>

                                  Exhibit 32.1

                               Pyramid Oil Company

                  Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                        As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
                         Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Pyramid Oil Company (the Company) on
form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, John H. Alexander, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



     Dated: March 29, 2007

                                               JOHN H. ALEXANDER
                                               -----------------
                                               John H. Alexander
                                            Chief Executive Officer





















PAGE <1>

                                   Exhibit 32.2

                                Pyramid Oil Company

                  Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                        As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
                         Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Pyramid Oil Company (the Company) on
form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Lee G. Christianson,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.




     Date: March 29, 2007

                                                LEE G. CHRISTIANSON
                                                -------------------
                                                Lee G. Christianson
                                              Chief Financial Officer
ex10a.htm
















Exhibit 10(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 22 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-145531) pertaining to Lincoln New York Account N for Variable Annuities, which is incorporated by reference into Post-Effective Amendment No. 22 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-141757) and Amendment No. 261 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-09763), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) April 1, 2014, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New York and (b) April 1, 2014, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln New York Account N for Variable Annuities for the registration of interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.













/s/ Ernst & Young LLP












Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


April 1, 2014
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 7 (Friday, January 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 1447]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-601]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP97-223-000]


Midwestern Gas Transmission

January 7, 1997.

    Take notice that on January 2, 1997, Midwestern Gas Transmission 
Company (Midwestern) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheet, to 
become effective on February 1, 1997:

First Revised Sheet No. 106

    Midwestern States that it is filing the proposed tariff change in 
order to eliminate the provision in its tariff that prevents requests 
for service from being submitted more than 90 days in advance of the 
date that the requested service is to commence.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-601 Filed 1-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# C_2022165EN.01002801.xml

| 19.4.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 165/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.4.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 165/28

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Pesti Központi Kerületi Bíróság (Hungary) lodged on 25 January 2022 — PannonHitel Pénzügyi Zrt. v WizzAir Hungary Légiközlekedési Zrt. (Wizz Air Hungary Zrt.)

(Case C-51/22)

(2022/C 165/36)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Pesti Központi Kerületi Bíróság

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: PannonHitel Pénzügyi Zrt.

Defendant: WizzAir Hungary Légiközlekedési Zrt. (Wizz Air Hungary Zrt.)

Question referred

Must Article 5(1)(a), the first indent of Article 8(1)(a) and Article 8(2) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91, (1) be interpreted as meaning that a passenger may exercise his or her right to reimbursement of the full cost of the ticket at the price at which it was bought directly against the air carrier, even where the passenger has booked the ticket with the help of a third party acting as an intermediary, to whom the passenger paid the ticket price, and it was the intermediary who purchased the ticket from the air carrier and who paid [the carrier] the ticket price, and there is no indication that the intermediary was acting as the authorised agent of the air carrier or that it was a tour operator?

---

(1)  OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1.

---