alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                                        5
<LEGEND>
The  schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  from the  Registrant's
consolidated  condensed financial  statements as of and for the six months ended
June  30,  1999,  and  is  qualified  in  its  entirety  by  reference  to  such
consolidated financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                                   0000818074
<NAME>                            ALL AMERICAN SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                                 1,000

<S>                                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                         JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                           JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                                         365
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               49,371
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 1,777
<INVENTORY>                                                 77,093
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           127,528
<PP&E>                                                      10,384
<DEPRECIATION>                                               6,108
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             136,094
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       49,881
<BONDS>                                                     59,263
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                        40
<OTHER-SE>                                                  26,910
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               136,094
<SALES>                                                    150,523
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           150,523
<CGS>                                                      121,612
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              121,612
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            25,505
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               369
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                           2,264
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                773
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   332
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                            441
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                                   441
<EPS-BASIC>                                                  .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                  .11


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-27-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1997
<CASH>                                              92
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,826
<ALLOWANCES>                                       541
<INVENTORY>                                     22,386
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                36,438
<PP&E>                                          49,781
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,192
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  87,535
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,883
<BONDS>                                         60,095
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             5
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,106
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    87,535
<SALES>                                         70,219
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                70,219
<CGS>                                           51,609
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   51,609
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,884
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,245
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,556
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,250
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,306
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,306
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .54
        

</TABLE>
EX-10.6(b)



 Exhibit 10.6(b) 

 

			
	June 1, 2013	  	

 Graham Capital Management, L.P. 
 Rock Ledge Financial Center 
 40 Highland Avenue 

Rowayton, CT 06853 
 Attention: Mr. Paul
Sedlack 
  

	 	Re:	Management Agreement Renewals 

 Dear
Mr. Sedlack: 
 We are writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the commodity pools to which reference is made below
(the “Management Agreements”). We are extending the term of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2014 and all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged. 

 

	 	•	 	 Diversified 2000 Futures Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 Fairfield Futures Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 Diversified Multi-Advisor Futures Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 Diversified Multi-Advisor Futures Fund L.P. II. 


  

	 	•	 	 Tactical Diversified Futures Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 Fairfield Futures Fund L.P. II 


  

	 	•	 	 CMF Graham Capital Master Fund L.P. 


 Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of Mr. Damian George at the address above or fax to 212-296-6868. If you have any
questions I can be reached at 212-296-1292. 
  

			
	Very truly yours,
	
	CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC
		
	By:	 	/s/ Damian George
		 	 Damian George

		 	Chief Financial Officer & Director
	
	GRAHAM CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, L.P.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Paul Sedlack



			
		
	Print Name:	 	Paul Sedlack, CEO

 DG/sr
# C_2022398EN.01003401.xml

| 17.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 398/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 398/34

---

Action brought on 29 August 2022 — Société des produits Nestlé v EUIPO — European Food (FITNESS)

(Case T-519/22)

(2022/C 398/41)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Société des produits Nestlé SA (Vevey, Switzerland) (represented by: A. Jaeger-Lenz, A. Lambrecht and A.-C. Salger, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: European Food SA (Drăgăneşti, Romania)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark FITNESS — European Union trade mark No 2 470 326

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 June 2022 in Case R 894/2020-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 103(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council in conjunction with Article 70 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 103(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council in conjunction with Article 70 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625;

| — | Infringement of Article 72(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 72(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council in conjunction with Article 70 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council in conjunction with Article 70 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.

---
No. 11-10777.

#### Coulibaly *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-11001.

#### Ruffin *v.*Houston Independent School District.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-10825.

#### Al-Rikabi *v.*United States.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 41 (Monday, March 3, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 9375]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5191]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 94-78; RM-8472 and RM-8525]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Cloverdale, Montgomery, and Warrior, 
AL

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule; petition for reconsideration.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document denies a petition for reconsideration filed by 
William P. Rogers that appeals the Report and Order, 60 FR 65021 
(December 18, 1995), in this proceeding insofar as it did not accept 
Rogers' counterproposal to allot Channel 254A to Florence, Alabama. The 
Report and Order was affirmed because Rogers' counterproposal did not 
provide 100 percent city-grade coverage of Florence, as required by 
Section 73.315(a) of the Commission's Rules.

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 3, 1997.

ADDRESS: Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC 20554.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: R. Barthen Gorman, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Memorandum Opinion and Order, MM Docket No. 94-78, adopted February 14, 
1997, and released February 21, 1997. The full text of this Commission 
decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business 
hours in the FCC's Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW., 
Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractors, International 
Transcription Service, Inc., 2100 M Street NW., Suite 140, Washington, 
DC 20037, (202) 857-3800.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
Douglas W. Webbink,
Chief, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 97-5191 Filed 2-28-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
# C_2022284EN.01004701.xml

| 25.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 284/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 284/47

---

Action brought on 23 May 2022 — Sattvica v EUIPO — Herederos de Diego Armando Maradona (DIEGO MARADONA)

(Case T-299/22)

(2022/C 284/64)

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Sattvica SA (Buenos Aires, Argentina) (represented by: S. Sánchez Quiles, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Herederos de Diego Armando Maradona (Buenos Aires)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: EU trade mark No 2 243 947 DIEGO MARADONA — Registration No T 019 473 761

Proceedings before EUIPO: Recordal in the files and in the Register

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 March 2022 in Case R 755/2021-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision and replace it with another decision recording the transfer of trade mark No 2 243 947 DIEGO MARADONA to SATTVICA SA; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision and replace it with another decision recording the transfer of trade mark No 2 243 947 DIEGO MARADONA to SATTVICA SA;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs, including those incurred before the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs, including those incurred before the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO.

Plea in law

| — | Misapplication of Article 20 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Misapplication of Article 20 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT  5

                                  May 22, 1997



Board of Directors of
Plains Resources Inc.
1600 Smith, Suite 1500
Houston, TX 77002

Gentlemen:

     I am General Counsel of Plains Resources Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), and have acted in such capacity in connection with the registration
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Act"), of 500,000 shares of
the Company's common stock, $0.10 par value (the "Shares"), to be offered upon
the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Company's 1996
Performance Option Plan (the "Plan").  The Company is filing a Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (the "Registration Statement") relating thereto with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

     In connection therewith, I have examined originals or copies, certified or
otherwise identified to my satisfaction, of the Plan, the Second Restated
Certificate of Incorporation of the Company as presently in effect, the Bylaws
of the Company, the corporate proceedings with respect to the offering of shares
and such other documents and records as I have deemed necessary or appropriate
for the expression of the opinions contained herein.

     I have assumed the authenticity and completeness of all records,
certificates and other instruments submitted to me as originals, the conformity
to original documents of all records, certificates and other instruments
submitted to me as copies and the correctness of all statements of fact
contained in all records, certificates and other instruments that I have
examined.

     Based upon the foregoing, and having regard for such legal considerations
as I deem relevant, I am of the opinion that:

     1)  The Company is duly incorporated, validly existing and in good standing
under the laws of the State of Delaware.

     2)  The Shares have been duly authorized for issuance and when issued in
accordance with the terms of the Plan, will be validly issued, fully paid and
nonassessable.

     I hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement and to the use of my name under the caption "Item 5.
Interests of Named Experts and Counsel" in the Registration Statement.

                                    Very truly yours,

                                    /s/ Michael R. Patterson
 
                                    Michael R. Patterson
                                    General Counsel
No. 11-10724.

#### Leech *v.*Holt, Warden.

C. A. 3d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

M EMORANDUM O RDER

Appellate case name: Jetall Companies, Inc. v. Mike Johanson and T. Michael Ballases

Appellate case number: 01

- 19

- 00305

- CV

Trial court case number: 2018

- 59629

Trial court: 333rd District Court of Harris County

Appellant Jetall Companies, Inc. filed a motion for en banc reconsideration of this Court’s

November 3, 2020 opinion. The motion for reconsideration en banc is denied

.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Terry Adams

Acting for the Court

En Banc Court consists of Chief Justice Radack, and Justices Keyes, Lloyd, Kelly, Goodman,

Landau, Hightower, Countiss, and Adams

.

Date: December 1 7 , 2020
#### Atlantic Coast Line R. R. Co. v. Robert Franklin Lamphear.

153 So. 916.

Division A.

Opinion Filed March 7, 1934.

*218
      *T. Paine Kelly,*for Plaintiff in Error.

*Jones & White,*for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

— This case is controlled in its major aspects by the opinion of this Court in the companion case of Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Lamphear, 109 Fla. 25, 146 Sou. Rep. 847, in that by stipulation of the parties in the court below it was agreed that the question of liability of the defendant in this case should be determined according to the decision of the Supreme Court in the companion case, wherein liability of the railroad company in the premises -was upheld by the affirmance of the judgment in said companion case. The facts and circumstances of this case are identical with those in the companion case. The only difference is that in this case the suit was prosecuted on behalf of a five-year-old child, w;ho, as an occupant of the automobile involved in the fatal injuries considered in the other case, was injured at the same time.

We cannot say on the present appeal that a recovery of $2,300.00 by a five-year-old child, for his permanent facial disfigurement and the consequent pain and suffering experienced by him as the result of an injury that occasioned the necessity of twenty-six stitches to sew it up because of the fact that the whole side of his face was lying over his head so that his teeth and jaw were visible through the hole in his face, is so excessive as to shock the judicial conscience. The evidence shows that the plaintiff’s face did not heal for several months and that the boy suffered, to such extent that he had to take his food through a glass *219tube during the period of two weeks that he was in the hospital. It was also shown at the trial had nearly three years after the injury, that an ugly scar still remained on the boy’s face and had the appearance of being permanent.

So the judgment must be affirmed and it is so ordered.

Davis, C. J., and Ellis and Terrell, J. J., concur.

Whitfield, P. J., and Buford, J., concur in the opinion and judgment.
No. 11-11028.

#### Guzman *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Thomas A. Andruskevich, Chairman of the Board of Directors, President andChief Executive Officer of Mayor’s Jewelers, Inc., certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/Aof Mayor’s Jewelers, Inc. 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared; (b) Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986. (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.
Date: January 7, 2005 /s/ Thomas A. AndruskevichThomas A. AndruskevichChairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In re Robert Munoz, * Original Mandamus Proceeding

No. 11-20-00074-CV * March 26, 2020

 * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J., 

sitting by assignment)

(Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that 

Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus should be denied. Therefore, in 

accordance with this court’s opinion, the petition for writ of mandamus is 

denied.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

BLEPHEX, LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

PAIN POINT MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., DBA MIBO 

MEDICAL GROUP, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee

______________________

2020-1187

______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Northern District of Texas in No. 3:16-cv-00410-N, Judge 

David C. Godbey.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

NATHAN K. KELLEY, Perkins Coie, LLP, Washington, 

DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by 

DAN L. BAGATELL, Hanover, NH; ANDREW DUFRESNE, Madison, WI. 

 JASON BLACKSTONE, Yarbrough Blackstone, Dallas, 

TX, argued for defendant-appellee. 

 ______________________

Case: 20-1187 Document: 43 Page: 1 Filed: 09/02/2020
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

 PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, DYK and HUGHES,

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

September 2, 2020

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Case: 20-1187 Document: 43 Page: 2 Filed: 09/02/2020