Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 66 / Wednesday, April 6, 2022 / Notices 19855 

1See Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Raw Honey from 

Argentina, Brazil, India, Ukraine and the Socialist 

Republic of Vietnam—Petition for the Imposition of 

Antidumping Duties,’’ dated April 21, 2021. 

2See Raw Honey from Argentina, Brazil, India, 

Ukraine, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: 

Initiation of Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigations, 86 

FR 26897 (May 18, 2021). 

3See Raw Honey from Ukraine: Preliminary 

Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than 

Fair Value, Postponement of Final Determination, 

and Extension of Provisional Measures, 86 FR 

66524 (November 23, 2021) (Preliminary 

Determination), and accompanying Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum. 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines in the 

Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigation of Raw Honey 

from Ukraine,’’ dated March 2, 2022. 

5See Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Withdrawal of Petition 

and Termination of Antidumping Duty 

Investigation,’’ dated March 24, 2022. 

6See Preliminary Determination. 

Requirements for Written Comments 

The https://www.regulations.gov 

website allows users to provide 

comments by filling in a ‘‘Type 

Comment’’ field, or by attaching a 

document using an ‘‘Upload File’’ field. 

The Department prefers that comments 

be provided in an attached document. 

The Department prefers supplemental 

submissions in Microsoft Word (.doc 

files) or Adobe Acrobat (.pdf files). If the 

submission is in an application format 

other than Microsoft Word, Microsoft 

Excel, or Adobe Acrobat, please indicate 

the name of the application in the 

‘‘Type Comment’’ field. Please do not 

attach separate cover letters to 

electronic submissions; rather, include 

any information that might appear in a 

cover letter within the comments. 

Similarly, to the extent possible, please 

include any exhibits, annexes, or other 

attachments in the same file, so that the 

submission consists of one 

supplemental file instead of multiple 

additional files. Comments (both public 

comments and non-confidential 

versions of comments containing 

business confidential information) will 

be placed in the docket and open to 

public inspection. Comments may be 

viewed on https://www.regulations.gov 

by entering docket number BIS–2021– 

0046 in the search field on the home 

page. 

All filers should name their files 

using the name of the person or entity 

submitting the comments. Anonymous 

comments are also accepted. 

Communications from agencies of the 

United States Government will not be 

made available for public inspection. 

Anyone submitting business 

confidential information should clearly 

identify the business confidential 

portion at the time of submission, file a 

statement justifying nondisclosure and 

refer to the specific legal authority 

claimed, and provide a non-confidential 

version of the submission. The nonconfidential version of the submission 

will be placed in the public file on 

https://www.regulations.gov. For 

comments submitted electronically 

containing business confidential 

information, the file name of the 

business confidential version should 

begin with the characters ‘‘BC.’’ Any 

page containing business confidential 

information must be clearly marked 

‘‘BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL’’ on the 

top of that page. The non-confidential 

version must be clearly marked 

‘‘PUBLIC.’’ The file name of the nonconfidential version should begin with 

the character ‘‘P.’’ The ‘‘BC’’ and ‘‘P’’ 

should be followed by the name of the 

person or entity submitting the 

comments or rebuttal comments. If a 

public hearing is held in support of this 

assessment, a separate Federal Register 

notice will be published providing the 

date and information about the hearing. 

BIS does not maintain a separate 

public inspection facility. Requesters 

should first view the BIS’s web page, 

which can be found at https://

efoia.bis.doc.gov/ (see ‘‘Electronic 

FOIA’’ heading). If requesters cannot 

access the website, they may call 202– 

482–0795 for assistance. The records 

related to this assessment are made 

accessible in accordance with the 

regulations published in part 4 of title 

15 of the Code of Federal Regulations 

(15 CFR 4.1 through 4.11). 

Thea D. Rozman Kendler, 

Assistant Secretary for Export 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2022–07211 Filed 4–5–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–33–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–823–820] 

Raw Honey From Ukraine: Termination 

of Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigation 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: Based on a withdrawal of the 

antidumping duty (AD) petition on raw 

honey from Ukraine by the American 

Honey Producers Association and the 

Sioux Honey Association (collectively, 

the petitioners), we are terminating this 

less-than-fair-value (LTFV) 

investigation. 

DATES: Applicable April 6, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jasun Moy, AD/CVD Operations, Office 

V, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–8194. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On April 21, 2021, Commerce 

received an AD petition concerning 

imports of raw honey from Ukraine, 

filed in proper form by the petitioners.1

On May 11, 2021, Commerce initiated 

the AD investigation on raw honey from 

Ukraine.2 On November 23, 2021, 

Commerce published its preliminary 

determination in the LTFV investigation 

of raw honey from Ukraine, in which we 

also postponed the final determination.3

On March 2, 2022, Commerce tolled all 

activities and deadlines by 90 days in 

this investigation in light of events 

occurring in Ukraine, thereby extending 

the deadline for the final determination 

until July 6, 2022.4 On March 24, 2022, 

the petitioners submitted a letter 

withdrawing the AD petition with 

respect to Ukraine.5

Section 351.207(b)(1) of Commerce’s 

regulations stipulates that the Secretary 

may terminate an investigation, 

provided it has concluded that 

termination of the investigation is in the 

public interest. Commerce has 

concluded that termination is in the 

public interest. Accordingly, pursuant 

to section 734(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (the Act), 19 CFR 

351.207(b)(1), and based on the 

petitioners’ letter withdrawing the AD 

petition, we are terminating this LTFV 

investigation. 

Termination of the Investigation 

In accordance with section 

734(a)(1)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.207(b)(1), upon the petitioners’ 

withdrawal of the petition, we are 

terminating the LTFV investigation of 

raw honey from Ukraine. 

Suspension of Liquidation 

In the Preliminary Determination, 

Commerce determined weightedaverage dumping margins for exporters 

of raw honey from Ukraine that were 

above de minimis. Therefore, we 

instructed U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection (CBP) to suspend liquidation 

of entries of raw honey from Ukraine as 

of November 23, 2021, the date of the 

publication of the Preliminary 

Determination.6 Because Commerce is 

terminating this LTFV investigation, we 

will instruct CBP to terminate 

suspension of liquidation and refund 

any cash deposits of estimated 

antidumping duties for entries of raw 

honey from Ukraine. 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
19856 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 66 / Wednesday, April 6, 2022 / Notices 

1See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 86 FR 

23925 (May 5, 2021). 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘2020–2021 Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review of Circular Welded 

Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from Thailand: 

Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated 

November 24, 2021. 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Circular Welded Carbon 

Steel Pipes and Tubes from Thailand: Decision 

Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and 

Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2020– 

2021,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby 

adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum). 

4See Antidumping Duty Order; Circular Welded 

Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from Thailand, 51 FR 

8341 (March 11, 1986) (Order). 

5See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 

‘‘Scope of the Order.’’ 

6See K-Line’s Letter, ‘‘Circular Welded Carbon 

Steel Pipes and Tubes from Thailand, Case No. A– 

S49–S02: Notice of No Sales,’’ dated May 31, 2021. 

7See Memorandum, ‘‘Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; Circular Welded Carbon 

Steel Pipes and Tubes from Thailand, 2020–2021: 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Data 

Release,’’ dated May 27, 2021 at Attachment. See 

also Instruction to Customs and Border Protection, 

‘‘No shipments inquiry for Circular Welded Pipes 

and Tubes from Thailand by K Line Logistics (A– 

549–502),’’ dated March 7, 2022; and 

Memorandum, ‘‘Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and 

Tubes from Thailand, 2020–2021: U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (CBP) Data Release,’’ dated May 

27, 2021. 

8See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). 

Dated: March 31, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2022–07270 Filed 4–5–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–549–502] 

Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes 

and Tubes From Thailand: Preliminary 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review and Preliminary 

Determination of No Shipments; 2020– 

2021 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) preliminarily finds that 

Saha Thai Steel Pipe Public Co., Ltd., 

also known as Saha Thai Steel Pipe 

(Public) Co., Ltd. (Saha Thai), as well as 

28 non-examined companies, made 

sales of subject merchandise at less than 

normal value during the period of 

review (POR) March 1, 2020, through 

February 28, 2021. We further 

preliminarily determine that K Line 

Logistics (Thailand) Ltd. (K-Line) had 

no shipments during the POR. We invite 

interested parties to comment on these 

preliminary results. 

DATES: Applicable April 6, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Michael Romani or Richard Roberts, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office I, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0198 or 

(202) 482–3464, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

These preliminary results are made in 

accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 

Act). Commerce published the notice of 

initiation of this administrative review 

on May 5, 2021.1 On November 24, 

2021, Commerce extended the time for 

issuing the preliminary results of this 

review to March 31, 2022.2

For a more complete description of 

the events between the initiation of this 

review and these preliminary results, 

see the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum.3 A list of topics 

discussed in the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum is attached in Appendix 

I to this notice. The Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at https://

access.trade.gov. In addition, the signed 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum can 

be accessed directly at https://

access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesList

Layout.aspx. 

Scope of the Order 4

The products covered by the Order 

are pipes and tubes from Thailand. For 

a full description of the scope of this 

Order, see the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum.5

Methodology 

Commerce conducted this review in 

accordance with section 751(a)(2) of the 

Act. Export price is calculated in 

accordance with section 772 of the Act. 

Normal value is calculated in 

accordance with section 773 of the Act. 

For a full description of the 

methodology underlying these 

preliminary results, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum. 

Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments 

On May 31, 2021, K-Line submitted a 

letter certifying that it had no exports or 

sales of subject merchandise into the 

United States during the POR.6 U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

did not have any information to 

contradict this claim of no shipments 

during the POR.7 Therefore, we 

preliminarily determine that K-Line did 

not have any shipments of subject 

merchandise during the POR. Consistent 

with Commerce’s practice, we will not 

rescind the review with respect to KLine but will complete the review and 

issue instructions to CBP based on the 

final results.8

Rate for Non-Examined Companies 

The statute and Commerce’s 

regulations do not address the 

establishment of a weighted-average 

dumping margin to be applied to 

companies not selected for individual 

examination when Commerce limits its 

examination in an administrative review 

pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the 

Act. Generally, Commerce looks to 

section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which 

provides instructions for calculating the 

all-others rate in a less-than-fair-value 

investigation, for guidance when 

calculating the weighted-average 

dumping margin for companies which 

were not selected for individual 

examination in an administrative 

review. Under section 735(c)(5)(A) of 

the Act, the all-others rate is normally 

an amount equal to the weightedaverage of the estimated weightedaverage dumping margins established 

for exporters and producers 

individually investigated, excluding any 

zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 

percent) margins, and any margins 

determined entirely on the basis of facts 

available. 

In this review, we have preliminarily 

calculated a weighted-average dumping 

margin for mandatory respondent, Saha 

Thai, that is zero percent. Where the 

rates for the individually examined 

companies are all zero, de minimis, or 

determined entirely using facts 

available, section 735(c)(5)(B) of the Act 

instructs that Commerce ‘‘may use any 

reasonable method to establish the 

estimated all-others rate for exporters 

and producers not individually 

investigated, including averaging the 

estimated weighted average dumping 

margins determined for the exporters 

and producers individually 

investigated.’’ One such reasonable 

method is to weight average the zero 

and de minimis rates, and the rates 

determined entirely pursuant to facts 

available. In fact, the SAA states that 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1