alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>5
       
<S>                                                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                 DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                                      JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                                               21826465
<SECURITIES>                                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                               0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                                0
<INVENTORY>                                                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                            0
<PP&E>                                                               28425913
<DEPRECIATION>                                                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                       50503102
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                       0
<BONDS>                                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                                           43784287
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                         50503102
<SALES>                                                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                      4309175
<CGS>                                                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                               0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                      3039239
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                       1269936
<INCOME-TAX>                                                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                   1269936
<DISCONTINUED>                                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                                          1269936
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                            1.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                               0
        

</TABLE>
No. 11-10852.

#### Hill *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 45 (Friday, March 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 10550]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5613]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. ER97-1663-000]


Commonwealth Edison Company; Notice of Filing

March 3, 1997.
    Take notice that on February 12, 1997, Commonwealth Edison Company 
(Edison) submitted Amendment No. 4, dated January 15, 1997, to the 
Electric Coordination Agreement, dated December 21, 1988 (ECA), between 
Edison and the Village of Winnetka, Illinois (Village). The ECA 
provides for the interchange of power and energy between Edison and 
Village. The Commission has previously designated the Interconnection 
Agreement as Edison's FERC Rate Schedule No. 37.
    Edison requests an effective date of December 31, 1996, for 
Amendment No 4 and, accordingly, seeks waiver of the Commission's 
notice requirements. Copies of this filing were served upon the Village 
and the Illinois Commerce Commission.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C., 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions and protests must be filed on or before March 13, 1997. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-5613 Filed 3-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 46 (Monday, March 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10828-10829]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5871]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Title and Associated Form: Pentagon Reservation Parking Permit 
Application,

[[Page 10829]]

DD Form 1199, OMB Number 0704--(to be added).
    Type of Request: New Collection.
    Number of Respondents: 20,000.
    Responses Per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 20,000.
    Average Burden Per Response: 15 minutes.
    Annual Burden Hours: 5,000.
    Needs and Uses: This collection of information is necessary for the 
administration and management of the Pentagon's Parking Control 
Program, and is designed to meet the requirements of the Federal 
Government mandated car pool program. The information collected hereby, 
will enable parking management personnel to validate parking 
requirements and monitor authorized parking on the Pentagon 
reservation.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Frequency: On occasion and annually.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
    OMB Desk Officer: Mr. Edward C. Springer.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Mr. Springer at the Office of Management 
and Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    DOD Clearance Officer: Mr. William Pearce.
    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Mr. Pearce, WHS/DIOR, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, 
Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302.

    Dated: March 5, 1997.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 97-5871 Filed 3-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
MEMORANDUM TO FILE 

TO: Docket No. EPA-R09-OAR-2013-0009; Approval of Air Quality 

Implementation Plans; Navajo Nation; Regional Haze Requirements for Navajo 

Generating Station; Proposed Rule 

FROM: Anita Lee 

Date: August 22, 2013 

Subject: Record of Consultation Meeting with the Gila River Indian Community during 

Public Comment Period 

1. Participants at Meeting 

 In Washington, DC: Pat Childers (EPA), Joann Chase (EPA), Governor Gregory Mendoza (Gila 

River Indian Community), Councilman Barney Enos, Councilman Norman Wellington, Don 

Pongrace (counsel for Gila River Indian Community) 

 In North Carolina, from EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards: Mike Koerber, Phil 

Lorang, Laura McKelvey, Greg Greene 

 In California, from EPA Region 9: Deborah Jordan, Ann Lyons, Anita Lee 

 In Arizona from EPA Region 9: Colleen McKaughan 

2. Date and Location of Meeting: 

 August 22, 2013 via video conference 

3. General Statement of the Topic of Discussion: 

 The Gila River Indian Community shared their thoughts on the Technical Work Group 

Agreement (of which they were a signatory). 

 The Community also provided some suggestions to EPA regarding future government-togovernment consultation on NGS. 

4. Copy of Any Materials Presented or Received (attached): 

 None
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Reynolds
Metals Company Consolidated Balance Sheet for December 31, 1996 and Consolidated
Statement of Income and Retained Earnings for the Year Ended December 31, 1996
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                              38
<SECURITIES>                                        00
<RECEIVABLES>                                      829
<ALLOWANCES>                                        18
<INVENTORY>                                        787
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1873
<PP&E>                                            6813
<DEPRECIATION>                                    3576
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    7516
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1333
<BONDS>                                           1793
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          1451
<OTHER-SE>                                        1183
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      7516
<SALES>                                           6972
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  7016
<CGS>                                             5856
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     6221
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    37
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 160
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    153
<INCOME-TAX>                                        49
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                104
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                         (15)
<NET-INCOME>                                        89
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.82
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
271 P.2d 4]

[L. A. No. 22940.

In Bank.

May 27, 1954.]

#### JOHN RIX TYRELL, Petitioner, v. THE COMMITTEE OF BAR EXAMINERS et al., Respondents.

Donald G. Hall for Petitioner.

Richard J. Archer for Respondents.

THE COURT.

John Rix Tyrell seeks to review a resolution of the Committee of Bar Examiners denying his application under section 6060.8 of the Business and Professions Code for admission to practice law without examination. The basis of the committee’s action was the determination that Tyrell had not “entered upon active duty in the armed forces” as required by that section.

After serving in the United States Naval Reserve during World War II, Tyrell was released to inactive duty. He commenced the study of law and in June 1952, was graduated from an accredited law school. The next final bar examination was conducted in October of that year.

*881Prior to graduation, Tyrell received orders to report on June 9th to a naval base for a 14-day tour of active duty for training. He was released to inactive duty at the end of that period, but on September 25th he was recalled to active duty for one day for the purpose of taking a physical examination. In October, Tyrell took the bar examination but failed to receive a passing grade.

In *Riave*v. *Committee of Bar Examiners, ante,*p. 835 [271 P.2d 1], it was held that the apparent purpose of section 6060.8 of the Business and Professions Code was to benefit those veterans whose law study was interrupted by recall to military service for the extended periods made necessary by the national emergency resulting from the Korean hostilities. That purpose does not contemplate the annual short tours of duty for training, and there is even less reason to conclude that the Legislature intended to exempt from a bar examination persons called to temporary active duty for a single day solely for the purpose of processing or a physical examination. *(Cf.*Mil. & Vet. Code, § 980, subd. (g).)

The application is denied.

Traynor, J., did not participate.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>            5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,469,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  419,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (376,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    763,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          31,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (31,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,441,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                     12,472,000
<COMMON>                                       532,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,000,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (26,914,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,441,000
<SALES>                                         27,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               136,000
<CGS>                                            3,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               527,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,847,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (2,249,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (2,249,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.54)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.54)
<FN>
<F1>Current Assets and Current Liabilities values are zero
because of an unclassified balance sheet.


</TABLE>
# C_2023223EN.01002501.xml

| 26.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 223/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 223/25

---

Judgment of the General Court of 3 May 2023 — Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi v EUIPO — Fontana Food (GRILLOUMI)

(Case T-168/22) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark GRILLOUMI - Earlier EU collective word mark HALLOUMI - Relative grounds for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Detriment to reputation - Article 8(1)(b) and Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

(2023/C 223/34)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi (Nicosia, Cyprus) (represented by: S. Malynicz and C. Milbradt, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Fontana Food AB (Tyresö, Sweden)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 3 January 2022 (Case R 1612/2021-5).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 207, 23.5.2022.

---
**Exhibit 24.01**

**POWER          OF ATTORNEY**

| /s/B.                    L. Amick     |   | /s/J.                    A. Bennett   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
| B.                    L. Amick        |   | J.                    A. Bennett      |
| Director                              |   | Director                              |
|                                  |   |                                  |
|                                  |   |                                  |
| /s/W.                    C. Burkhardt |   | /s/S.                    A. Decker    |
| W.                    C. Burkhardt    |   | S.                    A. Decker       |
| Director                              |   | Director                              |
|                                  |   |                                  |
|                                  |   |                                  |
| /s/D.                    M. Hagood    |   | /s/W.                    H. Hipp      |
| D.                    M. Hagood       |   | W.                    H. Hipp         |
| Director                              |   | Director                              |
|                                  |   |                                  |
|                                  |   |                                  |
| /s/L.                    M. Miller    |   | /s/M.                    K. Sloan     |
| L.                    M. Miller       |   | M.                    K. Sloan        |
| Director                              |   | Director                              |
|                                  |   |                                  |
|                                  |   |                                  |
| /s/H.                    C. Stowe     |   | /s/W.                    B. Timmerman |
| H.                    C. Stowe        |   | W.                    B. Timmerman    |
| Director                              |   | Director                              |
|                                  |   |                                  |
|                                  |   |                                  |
| /s/G.                    S. York      |   |                                  |
| G.                    S. York         |   |                                  |
| Director                              |   |                                  |
**EXHIBIT 31.1** **CERTIFICATION****of****Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to    Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)    under the****Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended**     I, Allen F. Grum, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this annual report on    Form 10-K    of Rand Capital Corporation and subsidiaries;     2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not    contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state    a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light    of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not    misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual    report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and    other financial information included in this annual report,    fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,    results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,    and for, the periods presented in this annual report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are    responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls    and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act    Rules 13a-15(e)    and    15d-15(e))    for the registrant and have:     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or    caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed    under our supervision, to ensure that material information    relating to the registrant, including its consolidated    subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those    entities, particularly during the period in which this annual    report is being prepared;     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s    disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annual    report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure    controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by    this report based on such evaluation; and     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that    occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter    that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to    materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over    financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I    have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal    control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s    auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of    directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in    the design or operation of internal controls over financial    reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the    registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and    report financial information; and     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves    management or other employees who have a significant role in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Dated: March 22, 2007