alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           98785
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 20000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      81416
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           21342
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             21346
<LOANS>                                         514592
<ALLOWANCE>                                       9249
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  937868
<DEPOSITS>                                      798928
<SHORT-TERM>                                      2953
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              11315
<LONG-TERM>                                      27657
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      11659
<COMMON>                                         85671
<OTHER-SE>                                       (363)
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  937868
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  32100
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 4744
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 36844
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               13005
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               14308
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            22536
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                     1087
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 (9)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  26031
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   3858
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        3858
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1628
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .090
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .085
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     5.7
<LOANS-NON>                                       8836
<LOANS-PAST>                                       486
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                  5662
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  5156
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                     1325
<RECOVERIES>                                       255
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 9249
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              9249
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
No. 11-10565.

#### Harper *v.*Allen.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# C_2023045EN.01001401.xml

| 6.2.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 45/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.2.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 45/14

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht (Germany) lodged on 7 December 2022 — I GmbH v J R

(Case C-749/22)

(2023/C 45/22)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesarbeitsgericht

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant on a point of law: I GmbH

Respondent of a point of law: J R

Question referred

Must Article 7 of Directive 2003/88/EC (1) and Article 31(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union be interpreted as precluding national legislation or practice under which paid annual leave, which was requested by a worker and approved by the employer and which overlaps in time after the leave was approved with a government-ordered quarantine at home where a possible infection is suspected, may not be granted retroactively where the worker is not incapacitated for work on account of illness during that quarantine?

---

(1)  Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time (OJ 2003 L 299, p. 9).

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND FROM THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          94,098
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,200
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                       1,035,009
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F2>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,469,705
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                      3,590,527
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,593,955)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,469,705
<SALES>                                        592,693
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               594,197
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  371,235
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             229,439
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (82,400)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (82,400)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (82,400)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>THE PARTNERSHIP HAS AN UNCLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET; THEREFORE, THE VALUE IS $0.
<F2>THIS INFORMATION IS NOT DISCLOSED IN THE PARTNERSHIP'S FORM 10-Q FILING.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
# C_2023112EN.01003501.xml

| 27.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/35

---

Order of the General Court of 7 February 2023 — Euranimi v Commission

(Case T-81/22) (1)

(Action for annulment - Dumping - Imports of stainless steel cold-rolled flat products originating in India and Indonesia - Definitive anti-dumping duty - Act not of individual concern - Regulatory act entailing implementing measures - Inadmissibility)

(2023/C 112/45)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: European Association of Non-Integrated Metal Importers & distributors (Euranimi) (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: M. Campa, D. Rovetta, P. Gjørtler and V. Villante, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: K. Blanck and G. Luengo, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant, an association representing the interests of European importers, distributors, traders and processors of unintegrated steel, stainless steel and metal products, seeks annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2012 of 17 November 2021 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and definitively collecting the provisional duty imposed on imports of stainless steel cold-rolled flat products originating in India and Indonesia (OJ 2021 L 410, p. 153).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the European Steel Association (Eurofer)’s application to intervene. |
| --- | --- |

2.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the European Steel Association (Eurofer)’s application to intervene.

| 3. | European Association of Non-Integrated Metal Importers & distributors (Euranimi) shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

European Association of Non-Integrated Metal Importers & distributors (Euranimi) shall pay the costs.

| 4. | Euranimi, the European Commission and Eurofer shall each bear their own costs relating to Eurofer’s application to intervene. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Euranimi, the European Commission and Eurofer shall each bear their own costs relating to Eurofer’s application to intervene.

---

(1)  OJ C 148, 4.4.2022.

---
No. 11-10912.

#### Baez *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Skip to main content

              - UAS
              - Software
              - Where to buy
              - Product Resources
              - Gallery
              - News

## Specifications

              - UAS                 - UX5
                - FAA Exemption
                - Specifications
                - User Stories 
                - Applications
                - Flight calculator
              - Software                 - Aerial App
                - TBC
                - UASMaster
                - Examples
                - Specifications
              - Where to buy
              - Product Resources                 - Downloads
              - Gallery
              - News

            - contact us
            - jobs
            - About us

              - academy

            - UX5
            - FAA Exemption
            - Specifications
            - User Stories 
            - Applications
            - Flight calculator

# Specifications

1 ISO standard atmosphere conditions2 UX5: recommended, not tested above 2500 m (8,202 ft)3 1 sigma for wind < 30 kmh (19 mph)

 Trimble #UX5 featured as new technology at the Agrishow in Brazil...

#UX5 Supports Environmental Cleanup in Israel...

 Trimble Partners with Industry Leading Multirotor - Unmanned Aircraft System Manufacturer...

## Newsletter subscription

**Trimble Navigation Limited, **Gent, Belgium

        - disclaimer
        - sitemap
        - designed & developed by XIO  

        - Twitter
        - Facebook
        - LinkedIn
        - YouTube
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 51 (Monday, March 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 12678]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6615]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration


RTCA, Inc., RTCA Special Committee 188; Minimum Aviation System 
Performance Standards for High Frequency Data Link

    Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is hereby given for an 
RTCA Special Committee 188 meeting to be held March 31-April 3, 1997, 
starting at 9:30 a.m. on Monday, March 31, and at 9:00 a.m. on the 
subsequent days. The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., 1140 
Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 1020, Washington, DC, 20036.
    March 31: Working Group 1 MASPS; April 1: Continue Working Group 1; 
April 2: Working Group 2 MOPS; April 3: Plenary Session (9:00 a.m.-
12:00 noon).
    The agenda of the Plenary Session will be as follows: (1) 
Introductory Remarks; (2) Review and Approval of Meeting Agenda; (3) 
Approval of the Summary of the Previous Meeting; (4) Review of Working 
Group 1 (MASPS) Work; (5) Review of Working Group 2 (MOPS) Work; (6) 
Open Discussion; (7) Adjourn,
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the RTCA Secretariat, 
1140 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 1020, Washington, DC, 20036; (202) 
833-9339 (phone); (202) 833-9434 (fax); or http;//www.rtca.org (web 
site). Members of the public may present a written statement to the 
committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington DC, on March 1, 1997.
Janice L. Peters,
Designated Official.
[FR Doc. 97-6615 Filed 3-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-13-M
#### COM. v. MATEO, E.

1784 MDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/22/2017

CP-67-CR-0005730-2015

(York)

Affirmed
PAGE <1>

                                  Exhibit 99.1

                               Pyramid Oil Company

                   Certification of the Chief Executive Officer
                        Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                        As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
                         Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned President of Pyramid Oil Company (the "Company"), hereby certify,
based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company
for the year ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



     Dated: March 26, 2003                     J. BEN HATHAWAY
                                               ---------------
                                               J. Ben Hathaway
                                                  President




























PAGE <1>

                                   Exhibit 99.2

                                Pyramid Oil Company

                   Certification of the Chief Financial Officer
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                       As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
                        Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Pyramid Oil Company (the "Company"),
hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB
of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




     Date: March 26, 2003                       LEE G. CHRISTIANSON
                                                -------------------
                                                Lee G. Christianson
                                              Chief Financial Officer
ex10-24.htm


Exhibit 10.24




 



FIRST AMENDMENT TO LOCK-UP AGREEMENT


 







 


This First Amendment to the Lock-Up Agreement is executed on this 25th day of March, 2014.  Reference is made to that certain the Lock-Up Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated August 18, 2011, by and between, Ah Wan Wong, a shareholder of the Company (the “Holder”) and Nova LifeStyle, Inc.,  a Nevada corporation (the “Company”).  Any capitalized terms in this amendment not otherwise defined shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Lock-Up Agreement (the “Agreement”).


 


WHEREAS, the parties agree that the definition of Lock-Up Period in the Agreement is not clear with respect to the situation of an Offering closing within one year from the date of the Agreement;







WHEREAS, the parties further agree to clarify the lock up period if the closing of an Offering does occur within one year from the date of the Agreement.


 


NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:


 


1. The seventh paragraph of the Agreement shall be modified to add a new item (iii) as follows: if the closing of an Offering does occur within one year from the date hereof, then three years from the date hereof.  After the modification, the seventh paragraph of the Agreement shall read as follows:


 


This Letter Agreement shall commence as of the date hereof and automatically terminate upon the earliest to occur of (i) three years following the date the Company’s securities are listed on a registered national securities exchange, (ii) if the closing of an Offering does not occur within one year from the date hereof, then two years from the date hereof, or (iii) if the closing of an Offering does occur within one year from the date hereof, then three years from the date hereof (the “Lock-Up Period”)


 


2. This first amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts each of which shall constitute an original but all of which when taken together shall constitute but one contract.


 


3. Except as amended hereby, or as otherwise amended, the Agreement is in all respects ratified and confirmed and the provisions thereof shall remain in full force and effect.


 


(THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)


(SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS)


 




  





1











  






 


                     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this FIRST AMENDMENT TO LOCK-UP AGREEMENT on the date first written above.


 












For and on behalf of:


 


NOVA LIFESTYLE, INC.



	  	  
	  	
 


By_____________________


Name: Tawny Lam


Title: Chairperson and President













	
 


Ah Wan Wong


 

	  	  	  
	
By_____________________


Name: Ah Wan Wong


 

	  	  	  












  





2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1995
<CASH>                                             584
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,642
<ALLOWANCES>                                       856
<INVENTORY>                                     12,993
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,580
<PP&E>                                          18,697
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,046
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  43,857
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,373
<BONDS>                                          1,458
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            46
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,539
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        43
<SALES>                                         34,032
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                34,032
<CGS>                                           25,491
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   35,987
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 551
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,390)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,390)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,390)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.52)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.52)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 21


                RGS ENERGY GROUP, INC AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
                    (Name changed from RG&E HOLDINGS, INC.)
                        SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT




Name of Company                                   State of Organization
---------------                                   ---------------------

Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation            New York
(formerly Rochester Railway and Light
Company)

Energetix, Inc. (Note 1)                          New York






Note 1:   Energetix owns Griffith Oil Company. Griffith Oil Company owns
          Stanbury Propane, Clark Oil, Bobbett Gas Service, Burnwell(R) Gas,
          AllEnergy - New York Fuels Division Companies, Yaw Oil, Tricounty
          Energy, Frey and Campbell, Inc., Rutgers Group, Inc. and Glo Gas
          Service of Rome, Inc.
No. 11-10838.

#### Mullinix *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-10707.

#### Clavelle *v.*Florida.

Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 41 (Monday, March 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 9423]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5105]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP97-254-000]


Williams Natural Gas Company; Notice of Filing of Penalty Revenue 
Report

February 25, 1997.
    Take notice that on February 18, 1997, Williams Natural Gas Company 
(WNG) tendered for filing a report of the amount of penalty revenue 
collected by WNG pursuant to the provisions of Article 9.5 of the 
General Terms and Conditions of its FERC Gas Tariff during Periods of 
Daily Balancing (PODB) occurring in January and February, 1996, and the 
proposed distribution of such revenue.
    WNG states that as a result of severe weather conditions and 
resulting high demand for gas in its major market areas, WNG imposed 
two PODBs pursuant to Article 9.3 of its tariff during the 1995-96 
winter heating season. These periods were January 19 and 20, 1996 and 
January 31 through February 4, 1996. Penalties were imposed for 
overruns of MDTQ and MDWQ, depletion of gas in storage, under receipts 
at receipt points and over deliveries at delivery points as provided in 
Article 9.5 of WNG's tariff. As a result, WNG has collected $3,169,881 
in penalty revenues through November 30, 1996. WNG proposes to refund 
these penalty revenues plus accrued interest ($90,398 through November 
30, 1996) to non-offending parties as shown herein.
    WNG states that a copy of its filing was served on all 
jurisdictional customers and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed on or 
before March 4, 1997. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-5105 Filed 2-28-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M