Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 48 / Wednesday, March 12, 1997 / Notices 11471

1Of course, these officials and these organizations

are not precluded from making further comment at

this time.

increases as a result of other factors,

including market changes, will not

require FPI to initiate the guidelines

process. The fact that 25% may

‘‘trigger’’ the guidelines does not

necessarily mean the Board of Directors

cannot approve an FPI production level

resulting in a federal market share above

25%.

The prior three years’ data will be

used to determine the share of the

federal government market, to ensure

that annual fluctuations are taken into

account and normalized.

FPI may produce at the rate of

previously achieved annual sales levels,

adjusted for inflation, without initiating

the guidelines process.

In cases where FPI sales inadvertently

or insubstantially exceed Board

authorized levels, FPI will make every

effort to adjust its production by a

corresponding among the following

year. If FPI plans call for continued

growth, it will invoke the guidelines

process without delay and seek Board

approval of future production levels.

Should the Board decide on a

production level lower than that which

FPI already achieved, FPI will adjust its

future plans and, if necessary scale

back, to comply with the Board’s

decision.

In cases of extreme public exigency,

such as national disaster or national

defense emergency, such as during

Operation Desert Storm, FPI may exceed

guidelines thresholds, provided FPI

receives specific orders or requests from

senior Department of Defense and/or

Executive Branch officials. Increased

sales resulting from national exigencies

will not be considered a violation of

guidelines ceilings in the year which

they occurred. In such cases, the higher

production levels achieved by FPI will

be temporary, and will not be used as

part of FPI’s baseline for future

calculations of significant expansion.

Such exceptional events will be subject

to approval by FPI’s Chief Operating

Officer, with concurrence of FPI’s Board

of Directors.

Subject to other provisions noted in

this procedure, FPI’s sales for the

current fiscal year will be utilized as the

based year for future application.

Prior decisions of FPI’s Board of

Directors will remain unaffected by

these changes to the definitions.

These proposed rules have been

reviewed by FPI’s Growth Strategies

Implementation Committee. The

following officials are represented on

the Committee:

Executive Vice President, Envelope

Manufacturers Association of

America

Vice President—Government Affairs,

Screen Printing and Graphic

Imaging Association International

Manager, Break-Out Procurement Center

Representative Program, Small

Business Administration

Former Senior Staff Member, Brookings

Institution

Head of Office of Wages and Industrial

Relations, AFL–CIO

President, State/Federal Correctional

Vendors Association

Their comments and suggestions have

been incorporated into this proposed

procedure.1

All comments received in response to

this proposed procedure have been

provided to the FPI Board of Directors,

which has approved these procedures

for publication and implementation on

an interim basis.

Robert Grieser,

Manager, Planning, Research and Activation

Branch.

[FR Doc. 97–6143 Filed 3–11–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–05–M

Office of Juvenile Justice and

Delinquency Prevention

Agency Information Collection

Activities: Proposed Collection;

Comment Request

AGENCY: Office of Justice Programs,

Justice.

ACTION: Notice of Information Collection

Under Review; Evaluation of the

Comprehensive Community-Wide

Approach to Gang Prevention,

Intervention, and Suppression

Program—‘‘Aggregate Data Forms:

Police and School.’’

Office of Management and Budget

(OMB) approval is being sought for the

information collection listed below.

This proposed information collection

was previously published in the Federal

Register and allowed 60 days for public

comment.

The purpose of this notice is to allow

an additional 30 days for public

comments. Public comments are

encouraged and will be accepted until

April 11, 1997. This process is

conducted in accordance with 5 Code of

Federal Regulation, Part 1320.10.

Written comments and/or suggestions

regarding the item(s) contained in this

notice, especially regarding the

estimated public burden and associated

response time, should be directed to the

Office of Management and Budget,

Office of Information and Regulatory

Affairs, Attention: Department of Justice

Desk Officer, Washington, DC, 20503.

Additionally, comments may be

submitted to OMB via facsimile to 202–

395–7285. Comments may also be

submitted to the Department of Justice

(DOJ), Justice Management Division,

Information Management and Security

Staff, Attention: Department Clearance

Officer, Suite 850, 1001 G Street, NW.,

Washington, DC 20530. Additionally,

comments may be submitted to DOJ via

facsimile to 202–514–1534. Written

comments and suggestions from the

public and affected agencies should

address one or more of the following

points:

(1) Evaluate whether the proposed

collection of information is necessary

for the proper performance of the

functions of the agency/component,

including whether the information will

have practical utility;

(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the

agencies/components estimate of the

burden of the proposed collection of

information, including the validity of

the methodology and assumptions used;

(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and

clarity of the information to be

collected; and

(4) Minimize the burden of the

collection of information on those who

are to respond, including through the

use of appropriate automated,

electronic, mechanical, or other

technological collection techniques or

other forms of information technology,

e.g., permitting electronic submission of

responses.

Overview of this information

collection:

(1) Type of information collection:

New collection.

(2) The title of the form/collection:

Evaluation of the Comprehensive

Community-Wide Approach to Gang

Prevention, Intervention, and

Suppression Program—‘‘Aggregate Data

Forms: Police and School.’’

(3) The agency form number, if any,

and the applicable component of the

Department sponsoring the collection.

Form: None. Office of Juvenile Justice

and Delinquency Prevention, Office of

Justice Programs, United States

Department of Justice.

(4) Affected public who will be asked

or required to respond, as well as a brief

abstract. Primary: Not-for-Profit

Institutions. Other: State, Local, or

Tribal Government. The study will

obtain interview and test information on

youth background, social adjustment,

deviancy/crime activity, self-esteem,

and depression/personality adjustment.

It will determine the effectiveness of the

program, comparing program subjects to

non-program gang youth of the same
11472 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 48 / Wednesday, March 12, 1997 / Notices

ages, approximately 13 to 20 years old,

and their backgrounds.

(5) An estimate of the total number of

respondents and the amount of time

estimated for an average respondent to

respond: 31 (11 police+20

schools@11.88 hrs. per response.

(6) An estimate of the total public

burden (in hours) associated with the

collection: 368.28 annual burden hours.

Public comment on this proposed

information collection is strongly

encouraged.

Dated: March 6, 1997.

Robert B. Briggs,

Department Clearance Officer, United States

Department of Justice.

[FR Doc. 97–6072 Filed 3–11–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–18–M

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Office of the Secretary

All Items Consumer Price Index for All

Urban Consumers United States city

Average

Pursuant to Section 604(c) of the

Motor Vehicle Information and cost

Savings Act, which was added to the

Motor Vehicle Theft Law enforcement

Act of 1984, and the delegation of the

Secretary of Transportation’s

responsibilities under that Act to the

Administrator of the Federal Highway

Administration (49 CFR 501.2(f)), the

Secretary of Labor has certified to the

Administrator and published this notice

in the Federal Register that the United

States City Average All Items Consumer

Price Index for All Urban Consumers

(1967=100) increased 51.0 percent from

its 1984 base period annual average of

311.1 to its 1996 annual average of

469.9.

Signed at Washington, D.C., on the 19th

day of February 1997.

Cynthia A. Metzler,

Acting Secretary of Labor.

[FR Doc. 97–6146 Filed 3–11–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING 4510–24–M

Employment and Training

Administration

Notice of Determinations Regarding

Eligibility To Apply for Worker

Adjustment Assistance and NAFTA

Transitional Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the

Trade Act of 1974, as amended, the

Department of Labor herein presents

summaries of determinations regarding

eligibility to apply for trade adjustment

assistance for workers (TA–W) issued

during the period of February, 1997.

In order for an affirmative

determination to be made and a

certification of eligibility to apply for

worker adjustment assistance to be

issued, each of the group eligibility

requirements of Section 222 of the Act

must be met.

(1) That a significant number or

proportion of the workers in the

workers’ firm, or an appropriate

subdivision thereof, have become totally

or partially separated,

(2) That sales or production, or both,

of the firm or subdivision have

decreased absolutely, and

(3) That increases of imports of

articles like or directly competitive with

articles produced by the firm or

appropriate subdivision have

contributed importantly to the

separations, or threat thereof, and to the

absolute decline in sales or production.

Negative Determinations for Worker

Adjustment Assistance

In each of the following cases the

investigation revealed that criterion (3)

has not been met. A survey of customers

indicated that increased imports did not

contribute importantly to worker

separations at the firm.

TA–W–32,949; Barclay Home Products,

Cherokee, NC

TA–W–32,950; Barclay Home Products,

Robbinsville, NC

TA–W–33,045; Union City Body Co L.P.,

Union City Body Co., Union City

Div., Union City, IN

TA–W–32,090; SGL Carbon Corp., St.

Marys, PA

TA–W–33,014; Remington Arms Co.,

Inc., Ammunition Div., Lonoke, AR

TA–W–32,927; Lucent Custom

Manufacturing Services, Whitsett,

NC

In the following cases, the

investigation revealed that the criteria

for eligibility have not been met for the

reasons specified.

TA–W–32,900; Pacificorp, Portland, OR

The workers firm does not produce an

article as required for certification under

Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974.

TA–W–32,919; Ferris Industries, Inc.,

Vernon, NY

TA–W–32,992; Concast Metal Products

Co., Dailey, WV

The investigation revealed that

criteria (2) and criteria (3) have not been

met. Sales or production did not decline

during the relevant period as required

for certification. Increases of imports of

articles like or directly competitive with

articles produced by the firm or

appropriate subdivision have not

contributed importantly to the

separations or threat thereof, and the

absolute decline in sales or production.

TA–W–32,886; Practical Peripherals—A

Hayes Div., Thousand Oaks, CA

TA–W–33,141; Xerox Corp., Oklahoma

City, OK

Increased imports did not contribute

importantly to worker separations at the

firm.

TA–W–32,834; BP Exploration, Inc.,

Houston, TX & Operating at

Various Locations in the Following

States; A; TX, B; LA, C: MS, D; GA

The investigation revealed that

criteria (1) and criteria (2) have not been

met. A significant number or proportion

of the workers did not become totally or

partially separated as required for

certification. Sales or production did

not decline during the relevant period

as required for certification.

TA–W–32,994; Minnesota Mining and

Manufacturing Co (3–M), St. Paul,

MN

The investigation revealed that

criteria (1) has not been met. A

significant number or proportion of the

workers did not become totally or

partially separated as required for

certification.

TA–W–32,939; Eaton Corp, Automotive

Controls Div., Wauwatosa, WI

In early 1996, the parent company of

the Automotive Control Div. of Eaton

Corp made a corporate decision to

transfer production to another domestic

facility.

TA–W–33,039; Brunswick Marine,

Nappene, IN

Production of fishing boats at the

subject plant was transferred to a

successor firm, which is located

domestically.

Affirmative Determinations for Worker

Adjustment Assistance

The following certifications have been

issued; the date following the company

name & location for each determination

references the impact date for all

workers for such determination.

TA–W–33,094; Amphenol Corp.,

Amphenol Aerospace Operations,

Sidney, NY: February 23, 1997.

TA–W–33,019; Kenneth Fox Supply Co.,

Fox Packaging, McAllen, TX:

November 25, 1995.

TA–W–33,028; Fun-Tees, Inc., Concord,

NC: December 4, 1995.

TA–W–33,078; Westinghouse Electric

Corp., Ft. Payne, AL: December 18,

1995.

TA–W–33,159; AMP, Inc., Roanoke, VA:

January 17, 1996.

TA–W–33,048; Hamilton Beach-Proctor

Silex, Inc., Washington, NC:

November 27, 1995.