alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Jackie Victor ADAMS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Eric D. WILSON, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 17-7229

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: February 26, 2018

Decided: March 7, 2018

Jackie Victor Adams, Appellant Pro Se. William Buchanan Jackson, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, HARRIS, Circuit Judge, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM

Jackie Victor Adams, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss with prejudice Adams’ 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition in which Adams sought to challenge his armed career criminal designation. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Adams has failed to satisfy his burden of demonstrating that 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) is an inadequate or ineffective means of challenging the validity of his detention. *See Rice v. Rivera,*617 F.3d 802, 807 (4th Cir. 2010); *United States v. Poole,*531 F.3d 263, 267 n.7 (4th Cir. 2008). As such, the district court lacked jurisdiction to consider the merits of Adams’ petition. *Rice,*617 F.3d at 807. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, modify the district court’s judgment to reflect that the dismissal of Adams’ petition is without prejudice, and affirm the district court’s judgment as modified. *See S. Walk at Broadlands Homeowner’s Ass’n v. Open-Band at Broadlands, LLC,*713 F.3d 175, 185 (4th Cir. 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED*
BLDG 254 

GREEN CARBON

Mt. Holly Anode Former Scrubber 

Layout Schematic

ANODE FORMER 

SCRUBBER

ID# 

50054

MIXER ANODE 

FORMER 

ANODE 

PASTE

ANODES

GREEN COOLING

COKE AS 

SCRUBBER MEDIA

COKE

PITCH

COKE ENRICHED WITH

PITCH FUMES

GREEN ANODES TO

BAKE FURNACE

COKE 

FINES 

TANK PITCH

FUMES
No. 11-10771.

#### Clay v. Glebe, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8877 

To make an emergency additional appropriation to carry out the Head Start 

Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 4, 2020 

Mr. NEGUSE (for himself and Mr. KATKO) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Appropriations 

A BILL 

To make an emergency additional appropriation to carry 

out the Head Start Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Jumpstart for Head 

5 Start Act of 2020’’. 

6 SEC. 2. APPROPRIATION. 

7 The following additional amount is hereby appro8 priated, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise 

9 appropriated, for the fiscal year ending September 30, 

10 2021, $1,700,000,000 for making payments under the 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8877 IH

1 Head Start Act, including for Federal administrative ex2 penses, and allocated in an amount that bears the same 

3 ratio to such amount as the number of enrolled children 

4 served by the Head Start agency involved bears to the 

5 number of enrolled children by all Head Start agencies: 

6 Provided, That none of the funds appropriated by this Act 

7 shall be included in the calculation of the ‘‘base grant’’ 

8 in subsequent fiscal years, as such term is defined in sec9 tions 640(a)(7)(A), 641A(h)(1)(B), or 645(d)(3) of the 

10 Head Start Act: Provided further, That funds appro11 priated by this Act shall not be subject to the allocation 

12 requirements of section 640(a) of the Head Start Act. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
#### Jeffrey ALLEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John DAILEY; Dan Berry, CEO Duke University Federal Credit Union; Alex Holmes, Money Gram CEO, Defendants-Appellees, and Chief Cerelyn Davis, Durham Police Department, Defendant.

No. 17-1971

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: February 28, 2018

Decided: March 6, 2018

Jeffrey Allen, Appellant Pro Se. Katherine Marie Barber-Jones, Dan M. Hart-zog, Jr., Dan McCord Hartzog, CRAN-FILL, SUMNER & HARTZOG, LLP, *235Raleigh, North Carolina; Caren D. Enloe, SMITH DEBNAM NARRON DRAKE SAINTSING & MYERS, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina; Ashley Burgess Bartolue-ci, Erin McNeil Young, HALL BOOTH SMITH, PC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jeffrey Alen appeals from the district court’s July 25, 2017, order dismissing the claims against three of four defendants in his civil action.1 We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.2*Allen v. Dailey,*No. 1:17-cv-00259-CCE-JLW (M.D.N.C. July 25, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*

1

. Although Allen’s notice of appeal was filed prior to the entry of final judgment, we have jurisdiction over Allen’s appeal from the July 25 order under the doctrine of cumulative finality. *Equip. Fin. Group, Inc. v. Traverse Comput. Brokers,*973 F.2d 345, 347-48 (4th Cir. 1992).

2

. Allen filed his notice of appeal before the district court entered its final order on September 22, 2017, dismissing the claims against the remaining defendant. Although, in some circumstances, an informal brief filed in this court may be sufficient to give the requisite notice of intent to appeal, *see Smith v. Barry,*502 U.S. 244, 248-49, 112 S.Ct. 678, 116 L.Ed.2d 678 (1992), Allen’s informal brief was not filed until November 15, 2017, after the expiration of the 30-day appeal period. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), Moreover, Allen did not obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), (6). Because "the timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement,” *Bowles v. Russell,*551 U.S. 205, 214, 127 S.Ct. 2360, 168 L.Ed.2d 96 (2007), we lack jurisdiction to review the district court's final order.
#### COM. v. JOHNSON, M.

3677 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/28/2017

CP-51-CR-0001854-2014 (Philadelphia)

Affirmed
No. 11-10200.

#### Hill *v.*White, Warden, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 7 (Friday, January 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 1457]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-615]



[[Page 1457]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY
[FEMA-1146-DR]


New York; Amendment to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of New York, (FEMA-1146-DR), dated November 19, 1996, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: December 17, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3260.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster for the State 
of New York, is hereby amended to include Public Assistance in those 
areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe 
declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of 
November 19, 1996:

Westchester County for Public Assistance and Hazard Mitigation.
Suffolk County for Public Assistance (already designated for 
Individual Assistance and Hazard Mitigation)

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 83.516, Disaster 
Assistance)
Lacy E. Suiter,
Executive Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 97-615 Filed 1-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
#### KOMATSU LTD., Appellant v. The AMERICAN TORCH TIP CO., Appellee

2017-1696

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

February 8, 2018

David Tarnoff, Global IP Counselors LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by Michael Thomas Murphy, Suzanne Konrad.

Mark Ferando Rubio, American Torch Tip, Co., Bradenton, FL, argued for appel-lee. Also represented by Sergey Vernyuk, Emerson Thomson Bennett, Akron, OH.

(Reyna, Taranto, and Hughes, Circuit Judges).

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 66 (Wednesday, April 6, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 19985]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-07316]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail and First-Class Package Service 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: April 6, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
March 28, 2022, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail & First-Class Package Service Contract 216 
to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, 
Docket Nos. MC2022-48, CP2022-53.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2022-07316 Filed 4-5-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
EX-4.8



 Exhibit 4.8 

Amendment to Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. 

2005 U.S. Equity Incentive Plan, dated January 22, 2014 

Effective as of January 22, 2014, the Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. 2005 U.S. Equity Incentive Plan (the
“Plan”) is hereby amended as follows (the “Amendment”): 
  

	 	1.	The first paragraph of Section 3 of the Plan shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 


“Subject to the provisions of Section 19 of the Plan, the maximum aggregate number of Shares which may be issued under the Plan
and the Company’s 2005 Israel Equity Incentive Plan, as amended (the “Israel Plan”, and collectively with the Plan, the “Equity Plans”)), is 19,000,000 Shares; provided, however, that on December 31st of each year,
commencing December 31, 2014, the number of Reserved and Authorized Shares (as defined below) under the Equity Plans shall be automatically reset on such date to equal 10% of the number of Shares issued and outstanding on such date; provided,
however, that in no event shall the number of Reserved and Authorized Shares be less than the number of Shares reserved and authorized under the Equity Plans for Awards granted under the Plans that are outstanding as of such date. The number of
“Reserved and Authorized Shares” under the Equity Plans shall equal the sum of (i) the number of Shares reserved and authorized under the Equity Plans for outstanding Awards granted under the Equity Plans as of such date, and
(ii) the number of Shares reserved, authorized and available for issuance under the Equity Plans on such date.” 
  

	 	2.	The third paragraph of Section 3 of the Plan shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 


“Intentionally omitted.” 
  

	 	3.	Section 7 of the Plan shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 


“Term of Plan. The Plan will become effective upon its adoption by the Board and will remain in effect until terminated
pursuant to Section 20 of the Plan.” 
  

	 	4.	Except as explicitly amended by this Amendment, all other terms of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****    - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский 

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

        - Student Loans
        - Grants
        - Laws
        - Data

# ESEA Flexibility

# ESEA Flexibility

                                    -                     How Do I Find...?    - Student loans, forgiveness
- Higher Education Rulemaking
- College accreditation
- Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
- FERPA
- FAFSA
- 1098, tax forms
- More...
      Information About...    - Elevating Teaching
- Early Learning
- Engage Every Student
- Unlocking Career Success
- Cybersecurity
             
*Our mission* is to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness by fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access.
- Student Loans
- Repaying Loans
- Defaulted Loans
- Loan Forgiveness
- Loan Servicers
- Grants & Programs
- Apply for Pell Grants
- Grants Forecast
- Apply for a Grant
- Laws & Guidance
- Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
- FERPA
- Civil Rights
- IDEA Website
- Data & Research
- Education Statistics
- Postsecondary Education Data
- ED Data Express
- Nation's Report Card
- What Works Clearinghouse
- Open Data Platform
- COVID Relief Data
- About Us
- Contact Us
- ED Offices
- Jobs
- Press Releases
- FAQs
- Recursos en español
- Budget, Performance
- Privacy Program
- Homeroom Blog
- Notices
- FOIA
- Privacy Policy
- Accessibility
- Security
- Information Quality
- Inspector General
- Whitehouse.gov
- USA.gov
- Benefits.gov
- Regulations.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                                       5
<LEGEND>
(Replace this text with legend, if applicable)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                                 0000818084
<NAME>                           BROWN-BENCHMARK PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
<MULTIPLIER>                                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                          U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                        JAN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                         SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                1
<CASH>                                                   583,754
<SECURITIES>                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             85,456
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         919,966
<PP&E>                                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        14,718,133
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    716,840
<BONDS>                                               14,011,368
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          14,718,133
<SALES>                                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       3,004,836
<CGS>                                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       2,160,475
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       815,113
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           29,248
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       29,248
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                              29,248
<EPS-BASIC>                                              0.060
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              0.000




</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 49 (Thursday, March 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 11849]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6355]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Defense Science Board Task Force on Advanced Modeling and 
Simulation for Analyzing Combat Concepts in the 21st Century

ACTION: Notice of advisory committee meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board Task Force on Advanced Modeling and 
Simulation for Analyzing Combat Concepts in the 21st Century will meet 
in open session on March 20-21, 1997 at the Central Florida Research 
Park, Orlando, Florida.
    The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary 
of Defense and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition on 
scientific and technical matters as they affect the perceived needs of 
the Department of Defense.
    Persons interested in further information should call Mr. Dave 
Bicksler at (703) 527-5410.

    Dated: March 10, 1997.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 97-6355 Filed 3-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
(logo) Rialto CAPITAL

 

 

**2016 Annual Statement ofServicer Compliance (Item 1123)**

 

Pooling and Servicing Agreement(the "Pooling and Servicing Agreement") dated as of July 1, 2015 byand among Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc., as Depositor, WellsFargo Bank, National Association as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors,LLC as Special Servicer, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Trust Advisor, WellsFargo Bank, National Association as Certificate Administrator, as TaxAdministrator and as Custodian, and Wilmington Trust, National Association asTrustee relating to the Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-NXS2,Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-NXS2

**(WFCM 2015-NXS2)**

 

 

The undersigned, a dulyauthorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer (the"Special Servicer") herein certifies to the following:

 

1. All servicing activitiesand performance of such servicing activities under the Pooling and ServicingAgreement are performed on behalf of the Special Servicer.

 

2. A review of the servicingactivities and performance by the Special Servicer for the period of January 1,2016 to December 31, 2016 (the "Reporting Period") in accordance withthe Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been conducted under my supervision.

 

3. To the best of my knowledge,based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligationsunder the term of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in all material respectsfor the Reporting Period and if there has been a failure to fulfill any suchobligations in any material respect, each failure and the nature and statusthereof has been specifically identified herein.

 

 

Certified by: /s/ Adam Singer

Adam Singer, Managing Director

 

Date: March 1, 2017
No. 11-10301.

#### Payne *v.*City of Missoula, Montana, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>

                                 EXHIBIT 23.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-02792) of Orthodontic Centers of America, Inc. and in the
Registration Statements (Form S-4 No. 333-05977 and Form S-4 No. 333-42655) and
related Prospectuses of our report dated March 23, 1998, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Orthodontic Centers of America, Inc.
included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1997.



                                                Ernst & Young LLP


New Orleans, Louisiana
March 26, 1998
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Ex parte Adrian Barnes 

Appellate case number: 01-19-00644-CR

Trial court case number: 1494270A

Trial court: 209th District Court of Harris County

We abated this appeal and remanded the case to the trial court for appellant to obtain 

a signed order on his application for a writ of habeas corpus and for the trial court to enter 

findings of fact and conclusions of law. The trial court clerk has filed a supplemental 

clerk’s record containing the trial court’s order denying appellant’s application for a writ 

of habeas corpus and the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. Accordingly, 

we reinstate the case on the Court’s active docket.

Appellant’s brief will be due within 30 days of the date of this order. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 31.1(a), 38.6(a). Appellee’s brief will be due within 20 days of the date the

appellant’s brief is filed. See id.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ____/s/ Julie Countiss___

  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: _September 12, 2019____
# C_2022294EN.01003101.xml

| 1.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/31

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 8 June 2022 — Hungary v Commission

(Case T-104/22 R)

(Interim measures - Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - European Structural and Investment Funds - Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 - Documents originating in a Member State - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Prima facie case - Urgency - Balancing of interests)

(2022/C 294/45)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Parties

Applicant: Hungary (represented by: M. Fehér and G. Koós, acting as Agents)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Ehrbar, A. Spina and A. Tokár, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its application, based on Articles 278 and 279 TFEU, the applicant seeks suspension of operation of the European Commission’s Decision of 14 December 2021, adopted in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43), concerning the confirmatory application GestDem 2021/2808, which is aimed at ensuring public access to documents originating from its authorities.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | Operation of the European Commission’s decision of 14 December 2021, adopted in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents, concerning the confirmatory application GestDem 2021/2808, which is aimed at ensuring public access to documents originating from the Hungarian authorities, is suspended in so far as that decision grants access to documents originating from those authorities. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Operation of the European Commission’s decision of 14 December 2021, adopted in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents, concerning the confirmatory application GestDem 2021/2808, which is aimed at ensuring public access to documents originating from the Hungarian authorities, is suspended in so far as that decision grants access to documents originating from those authorities.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---