alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------



                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, the undersigned officer of Harold's Stores,
Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that the Company's Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended July 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.



Date: September 30, 2005

/s/ Leonard Snyder
-----------------------
Leonard Snyder
Interim Chief Executive Officer
#### NOWECK, J. v. PENNDOT

1991 CD 2016

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

10/23/2017

Allegheny County Civil Division, SA-16-000720

Vacated/Remanded
EXHIBIT 32.1








    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOss.906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2003, for each of PNM Resources, Inc. and Public Service Company of New
Mexico ("Companies"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
March 10, 2004 ("Report"), I, Jeffry E. Sterba, Chief Executive Officer of the
Companies, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

       (1)    the Report fully complies with the  requirements  ofss.13(a) or
              15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

       (2)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Companies.




Date:   March 10, 2004                 By:     /s/ Jeffry E. Sterba
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Jeffry E. Sterba
                                               Chairman, President and
                                               Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 31.1
RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
I, Timothy W. Byrne, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of United States Lime & Minerals, Inc.; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and  c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and  b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Dated: March 23, 2005 /s/ Timothy W. Byrne   Timothy W. Byrne   President and Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Brett D. Davis, certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of CNH Equipment Trust 2015-A (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.             I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

 

5.             All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas.

 
| March 25, 2019 |   |
|---------------------|--------|
|                |   |
|                | By:    | /s/ Brett D. Davis |
|                | Name:  | Brett D. Davis |
|                | Title: | President (senior officer in   charge of the servicing function) |

 

----
No. 11-10827.

#### Bennett *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
SCPR-18-0000891

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

IN RE NELSON T. NAGAUE, Petitioner.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ORDER GRANTING PETITION TO RESIGN AND SURRENDER LICENSE

(By Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson JJ.)

Upon consideration of the petition to resign and

surrender his license to practice law in the State of Hawai#i

filed by attorney Nelson T. Nagaue, pursuant to Rule 1.10 of the

Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai#i (RSCH), and

the affidavits submitted in support thereof, we conclude

Petitioner Nagaue has complied with the requirements of RSCH

Rule 1.10. Therefore, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition is granted and

Petitioner Nagaue’s resignation in good standing is accepted,

effective December 31, 2018. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to RSCH Rule 1.10(g),

that the Petitioner shall comply with the notice, affidavit, and

record requirements of RSCH Rules 2.16(a), (b), (d), and (g).

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCPR-18-0000891

30-NOV-2018

09:58 AM
IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the Clerk shall remove the

name of Petitioner Nelson T. Nagaue, attorney number 1335, from

the roll of attorneys of the State of Hawai#i, as of December 31,

2018.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, November 30, 2018. 

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna 

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

2
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 49 (Thursday, March 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11933-11934]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6340]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50-461-OLA, ASLBP No. 97-725-01-OLA]


Illinois Power Co., Soyland Power Cooperative; Establishment of 
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board

    Pursuant to delegation by the Commission dated December 29, 1972, 
published in the Federal Register, 37 FR 28710 (1972), and Secs. 2.105, 
2.700, 2.702, 2.714, 2.714a, 2.717 and 2.721 of the Commission's 
Regulations, all as amended, an Atomic Safety and Licensing Board is 
being established in the following proceeding to rule on petitions for 
leave to intervene and/or requests for hearing and to preside over the 
proceeding in the event that a hearing is ordered.

Southwestern Electric Cooperative, Inc., Illinois Power Company, 
Soyland Power Cooperative

    This Board is being established pursuant to a notice published by 
the Commission on January 29, 1997, in the Federal Register Z (60 FR 
45180). The notice issued by the NRC staff regards a proposed transfer 
of a facility operating license held by Soyland Power Cooperative to 
Illinois Power Company. The petitioner, Southwestern Electric 
Cooperative, Inc., seeks to intervene and requests a hearing.
    The Board is comprised of the following administrative judges:

G. Paul Bollwerk III, Chairman, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board 
Panel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555
Peter B. Bloch, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. 
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555
Thomas D. Murphy, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. 
Nuclear

[[Page 11934]]

Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555

    All correspondence, documents and other materials shall be filed 
with the Judges in accordance with 10 CFR 2.701.

    Issued at Rockville, MD, this 7th day of March 1997.
B. Paul Cotter, Jr.,
Chief Administrative Judge, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel.
[FR Doc. 97-6340 Filed 3-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 48 (Wednesday, March 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 11423]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6123]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP97-59-002]


Midwestern Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Tariff Filing

March 6, 1997.
    Take notice that on March 3, 1997, Midwestern Gas Transmission 
Company (Midwestern), filed the revised tariff sheets listed on 
Appendix A to the filing, in compliance with the Commission's 
directives in Orders No. 587 and 587-B, and the Commission's January 8, 
1997 order in this proceeding. Midwestern proposes an effective date of 
May 1, 1997 for the revised sheets.
    Midwestern states that the revised tariff sheets reflect the 
changes to Midwestern's tariff that result from the Gas Industry 
Standards Board's (GISB) consensus standards that were adopted by the 
Commission in Order Nos. 587 and 587-B. The filed tariff sheets also 
reflect the changes required by the January 8, 1997 order to the pro 
forma sheets in Midwestern's November 1, 1996 GISB compliance filing.
    Midwestern states that copies of the filing have been mailed to all 
affected customers and state regulatory commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Regulations. All such protests must be filed on or before 
March 21, 1997. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to this proceeding. Copies of this filing are 
on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in 
the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-6123 Filed 3-11-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 49 (Thursday, March 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11854-11855]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6282]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP96-320-008]


Koch Gateway Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

March 7, 1997.
    Take notice that on March 5, 1997, Koch Gateway Pipeline Company 
(Koch) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Fifth 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff sheet, to be 
effective March 1, 1997:

Third Revised Sheet No. 29

    Koch states that this tariff sheet removes from the tariff two 
expired negotiated rate transactions.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E. 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's

[[Page 11855]]

regulations. All such protest must be filed in accordance with Section 
154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by 
the Commission in determining appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of 
this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for 
public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-6282 Filed 3-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EX-31 Rule13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Leah Nivison,certify that:

 

1. I have reviewedthis report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respectof the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the GS Mortgage SecuritiesTrust 2015-GC28 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

 

2. Based on myknowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Based on myknowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required tobe provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is includedin the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on myknowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report underItem 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Actperiodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under theservicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reportson assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securitiesand their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance withservicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in thisreport in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except asotherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliancedescribed in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving thecertifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me bythe following unaffiliated parties:

 

Wells Fargo Bank,National Association, as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, asSpecial Servicer, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee, WellsFargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator, Wells FargoBank, National Association, as Custodian, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, asOperating Advisor, CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc., asServicing Function Participant, National Tax Search, LLC, as Servicing FunctionParticipant, and Berkeley Point Capital LLC, as Primary Servicer.

 

 

 

Dated: August 3, 2018

 

 

/s/ Leah Nivison

 

 

Chief ExecutiveOfficer

(seniorofficer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
#### Marlos M. MOORE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LEWIS, Sgt.; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-16135

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted February 13, 2018 *

Filed February 22, 2018

Marios M. Moore, Pro Se

D. Randall Gilmer, Deputy Attorney General, AGNV—Office of the Nevada Attorney General (Las Vegas), Las Vegas, NV, for Defendants-Appellees

Before: LEAVY, FERNANDEZ, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P, 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Marios M. Moore, a Nevada state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging claims arising from his conditions of confinement. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

In his opening brief, Moore failed to challenge the district court’s grant of summary judgment, and therefore Moore waived any such challenge. *See Smith v. Marsh,*194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir. 1999) (“[Arguments not raised by a party in its opening brief are deemed waived.”).

We lack jurisdiction to consider Moore’s challenge to the district court’s order denying Moore’s post-judgment motion to reconsider because Moore failed to file an amended or separate notice of appeal after entry of the district court’s order denying the motion. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4)(B)(ii); *Stephanie-Cardona LLC v. Smith’s Food & Drug Ctrs., Inc.,*476 F.3d 701, 703 (9th Cir. 2007) (“A timely notice of appeal is a non-waivable jurisdictional requirement.”).

We do not consider arguments and allegations raised for the first time on appeal. *See Padgett v. Wright,*587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

We do not consider documents: not presented to the district court. *See United States v. Elias,*921 F.2d 870, 874 (9th Cir. 1990).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****    - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский 

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

        - Student Loans
        - Grants
        - Laws
        - Data

            - taxonomy view
            - Rhode Island 

# Rhode Island 

# Rhode Island 

                      -  July 15, 2021  U.S. Department of Education Approves Rhode Island’s Plan for Use of American Rescue Plan Funds to Support K-12 Schools and Students, Distributes Remaining $138 Million    
On Wednesday, July 7, the U.S. Department of Education  (Department) announced the approval of Rhode Island’s American Rescue Plan  Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ARP ESSER) plans and  distributed remaining ARP ESSER funds to them.
  **Tags:**Rhode IslandAmerican Rescue PlanPress Releases

## How Do I Find...?

                      - Student loans, forgiveness
                      - Higher Education Rulemaking
                      - College accreditation
                      - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
                      - FERPA
                      - FAFSA
                      - 1098, tax forms
                      - More...

## Information About...

                      - Elevating Teaching
                      - Early Learning
                      - Engage Every Student
                      - Unlocking Career Success
                      - Cybersecurity

----

*Our mission* is to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness by fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access.

          - Student Loans
          - Repaying Loans
          - Defaulted Loans
          - Loan Forgiveness
          - Loan Servicers
          - Grants & Programs
          - Apply for Pell Grants
          - Grants Forecast
          - Apply for a Grant

          - Laws & Guidance
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - Civil Rights
          - IDEA Website
          - Data & Research
          - Education Statistics
          - Postsecondary Education Data
          - ED Data Express
          - Nation's Report Card
          - What Works Clearinghouse
          - Open Data Platform
          - COVID Relief Data

          - About Us
          - Contact Us
          - ED Offices
          - Jobs
          - Press Releases
          - FAQs
          - Recursos en español
          - Budget, Performance
          - Privacy Program
          - Homeroom Blog

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information Quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
# C_2023127EN.01003801.xml

| 11.4.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 127/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.4.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 127/38

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 February 2023 — Freixas Montplet and Others v Committee of the Regions

(Case T-260/22) (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Promotion - 2021 promotion exercise - Decision not to place the applicant’s name on the list of officials eligible for promotion - Date of assessment of seniority in grade - Article 45(1) of the Staff Regulations - Equal treatment)

(2023/C 127/47)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: David Freixas Montplet (Berchem-Sainte-Agathe, Belgium), Gustavo López Cutillas (Woluwe-Saint-Pierre, Belgium), Valeria Schirru (Brussels, Belgium), Svetlozar Andreev (Brussels) (represented by: L. Levi and P. Baudoux, lawyers)

Defendant: Committee of the Regions (represented by: B. Rentmeister, acting as Agent)

Re:

By their action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicants seek annulment of the list, drafted by the Committee of the Regions, of officials eligible for promotion in the 2021 promotion exercise, in so far as that list does not include their names.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Mr David Freixas Montplet, Mr Gustavo López Cutillas, Ms Valeria Schirru and Mr Svetlozar Andreev shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the Committee of the Regions. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr David Freixas Montplet, Mr Gustavo López Cutillas, Ms Valeria Schirru and Mr Svetlozar Andreev shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the Committee of the Regions.

---

(1)  OJ C 244, 27.6.2022.

---