alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2022340EN.01005501.xml

| 5.9.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 340/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.9.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 340/55

---

Action brought on 22 July 2022 — Sky v EUIPO — Skyliners (SKYLINERS)

(Case T-454/22)

(2022/C 340/74)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Sky Ltd (Isleworth, United Kingdom) (represented by: A. Zalewska-Orabona, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Skyliners GmbH (Frankfurt am Main, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark SKYLINERS — Application for registration No 14 570 915

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 April 2022 in Case R 0006/2022-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO and, in case the other party joins the proceedings, the intervener, to bear the costs incurred by the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and, in case the other party joins the proceedings, the intervener, to bear the costs incurred by the applicant.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Articles 8(1)(b), 8(5) and 8(4) in conjunction with Article 41(1)(a) and (c) and Article 8(2) of Council Regulation (EC) 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Articles 8(1)(b), 8(5) and 8(4) in conjunction with Article 41(1)(a) and (c) and Article 8(2) of Council Regulation (EC) 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 27(4) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 in conjunction with Article 95(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 27(4) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 in conjunction with Article 95(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-01-1998
<CASH>                                              50
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,931
<ALLOWANCES>                                       235
<INVENTORY>                                     30,583
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                41,132
<PP&E>                                          30,772
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,824
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  62,207
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,218
<BONDS>                                         17,547
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,069
<OTHER-SE>                                      37,277
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    62,207
<SALES>                                         61,255
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                61,255
<CGS>                                           40,543
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   40,543
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,066
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 423
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,223
<INCOME-TAX>                                       489
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                734
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                           50
<NET-INCOME>                                       684
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.11
        

</TABLE>
No. 11-10363.

#### Yarns *v.*Florida.

Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             234,300
<SECURITIES>                                       140,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                      702,270
<ALLOWANCES>                                       344,970
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,293,360  
<PP&E>                                           1,303,300
<DEPRECIATION>                                     788,800
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,196,070
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,617,360
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0 
<COMMON>                                           233,870
<OTHER-SE>                                          42,930
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,196,076
<SALES>                                          2,486,770
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,486,770
<CGS>                                            1,418,220
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,978,204
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    (3,663)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  72,822
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (560,590)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (560,590)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  (7,047,880)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0        
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (7,608,469)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (0.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>
# C_2022207EN.01004901.xml

| 23.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 207/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 207/49

---

Action brought on 30 March 2022 — Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi v EUIPO — Fontana Food (GRILLOUMI)

(Case T-168/22)

(2022/C 207/65)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi (Nicosia, Cyprus) (represented by: S. Malynicz, Barrister-at-law, and C. Milbradt, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Fontana Food AB (Tyresö, Sweden)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark GRILLOUMI — Application for registration No 15 963 291

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 January 2022 in Case R 1612/2021-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | allow the applicant’s appeal; |
| --- | --- |

—

allow the applicant’s appeal;

| — | order the defendant to bear its own costs and pay those of the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to bear its own costs and pay those of the applicant.

Pleas in law

| — | The Board of Appeal’s analysis of distinctive character erred substantially; |
| --- | --- |

—

The Board of Appeal’s analysis of distinctive character erred substantially;

| — | The Board of Appeal erred in failing to find a likelihood of confusion; |
| --- | --- |

—

The Board of Appeal erred in failing to find a likelihood of confusion;

| — | The Board of Appeal erred in failing to deliver to the applicant a fair trial on all of the issues. |
| --- | --- |

—

The Board of Appeal erred in failing to deliver to the applicant a fair trial on all of the issues.

---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 51 (Monday, March 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 12659]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6631]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institute of Mental Health; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting of the National Institute of Mental Health Special Emphasis 
Panel:

    Agenda/Purpose: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Committee Name: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel.
    Date: March 17, 1997.
    Time: 2:30 p.m.
    Place: Parklawn, Room 9C-18, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 
20857.
    Contact Person: Gloria B. Levin, Parklawn, Room 9C-18, 5600 
Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, Telephone: 301, 443-1367.
    The meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6) Title 5, U.S.C. 
Applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
    This notice is being published less than fifteen days prior to 
the meeting due to the urgent need to meet timing limitations 
imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Numbers 93.242, 
93.281, 93,282)

    Dated: March 12, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-6631 Filed 3-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
# C_2022276EN.01002201.xml

| 18.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 276/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 276/22

---

Action brought on 30 May 2022 — International Foodstuffs v EUIPO — Société des produits Nestlé (TIFFANY CRUNCH N CREAM)

(Case T-321/22)

(2022/C 276/31)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: International Foodstuffs Co. LLC (Sharjah, United Arab Emirates) (represented by: J. Blum, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Société des produits Nestlé SA (Vevey, Switzerland)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark TIFFANY CRUNCH N CREAM — Application for registration No 18 002 077

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 March 2022 in Case R 2136/2020-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision in its entirety; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision in its entirety;

| — | order, pursuant to Article 134 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court, EUIPO and the intervener to pay the costs incurred by the applicant in the present proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order, pursuant to Article 134 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court, EUIPO and the intervener to pay the costs incurred by the applicant in the present proceedings.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
No. 11-10757.

#### Chatt, Individually and as Co-Administrator of the Estate of Chatt, Deceased *v.*City of West Memphis, Arkansas, et al.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
# C_2022311EN.01002202.xml

| 16.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 311/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 311/22

---

Action brought on 4 July 2022 — Banque postale v SRB

(Case T-394/22)

(2022/C 311/26)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: La Banque postale (Paris, France) (represented by: A. Gosset-Grainville, M. Trabucchi and M. Dalon, lawyers)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board (SRB)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | pursuant to Article 263 TFEU, annul Decision SRB/ES/2022/18 of 11 April 2022 on the calculation of 2022 ex-ante contributions to the SRF in so far as it concerns the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

pursuant to Article 263 TFEU, annul Decision SRB/ES/2022/18 of 11 April 2022 on the calculation of 2022 ex-ante contributions to the SRF in so far as it concerns the applicant;

| — | pursuant to Article 277 TFEU, declare the following provisions of the SRM Regulation, (1) the Implementing Regulation (2) and the Delegated Regulation (3) inapplicable:






  — | Articles 69(1), 69(2), 70(1) and 70(2)(a) and (b) of the SRM Regulation; |
| --- | --- | --- |

—

pursuant to Article 277 TFEU, declare the following provisions of the SRM Regulation, (1) the Implementing Regulation (2) and the Delegated Regulation (3) inapplicable:

—

Articles 69(1), 69(2), 70(1) and 70(2)(a) and (b) of the SRM Regulation;

| — | Articles 4(2), 5,6, 7 and 20 of the Delegated Regulation, and Annex I thereto; |
| --- | --- |

—

Articles 4(2), 5,6, 7 and 20 of the Delegated Regulation, and Annex I thereto;

| — | Article 4 of the Implementing Regulation; |
| --- | --- |

—

Article 4 of the Implementing Regulation;

| — | order the defendant to pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay all the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on eight pleas in law which are, in essence, identical or similar to those raised in Case T-391/22, Société générale and Others v SRB.

---

(1)  Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2014 establishing uniform rules and a uniform procedure for the resolution of credit institutions and certain investment firms in the framework of a Single Resolution Mechanism and a Single Resolution Fund and amending Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 (OJ 2014 L 255, p. 1).

(2)  Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/81 of 19 December 2014 specifying uniform conditions of application of Regulation No 806/2014 with regard to ex ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (OJ 2015 L 15, p. 1).

(3)  Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/63 of 21 October 2014 supplementing Directive 2014/59 with regard to ex ante contributions to resolution financing arrangements (OJ 2015 L 11, p. 44).

---
No. 11-10558.

#### Wallace *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# C_2023035EN.01006301.xml

| 30.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 35/63 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 35/63

---

Action brought on 21 September 2022 — Ferreira de Macedo Silva v Frontex

(Case T-595/22)

(2023/C 35/78)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Carlos Miguel Ferreira de Macedo Silva (Cercal do Alentejo, Portugal) (represented by: L. Cosme Nunes Rolo, lawyer)

Defendant: European Border and Coast Guard Agency

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of 29 August 2022 of the Deputy Executive Director for Information Management and Processes of the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex), acting as Appointing Authority, to dismiss him before the end of probationary period as temporary staff of Standing Corps, Cat. 1; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of 29 August 2022 of the Deputy Executive Director for Information Management and Processes of the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex), acting as Appointing Authority, to dismiss him before the end of probationary period as temporary staff of Standing Corps, Cat. 1;

| — | order that Frontex, in case of impossible readmission in time in Batch 8, pay all costs related to the fulfilment of the five year contract, and legal expenses. |
| --- | --- |

—

order that Frontex, in case of impossible readmission in time in Batch 8, pay all costs related to the fulfilment of the five year contract, and legal expenses.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging infringement of the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations, and violation of the principle of equal treatment in employment (reference: Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000). (1) |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging infringement of the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations, and violation of the principle of equal treatment in employment (reference: Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000). (1)

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging infringement of essential procedural requirements and also of the right to good administration and the right to be heard. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging infringement of essential procedural requirements and also of the right to good administration and the right to be heard.

---

(1)  Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation (OJ 2000 L 303, p. 16).

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       5
<LEGEND>
The Schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from the financial statements for Liberty Tax Credit Plus L.P. and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                           0000818020
<NAME>                          Liberty Tax Credit Plus L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                    1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               MAR-15-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  MAR-16-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-15-1999
<CASH>                          14,900,430
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   659,620
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                1,292,694
<PP&E>                          257,814,198
<DEPRECIATION>                  94,705,230
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  183,215,362
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           30,262,247
<BONDS>                         157,869,916
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        0
<OTHER-SE>                      (4,916,801)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    183,215,362
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                17,725,242
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                15,270,881
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              6,322,385
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0
<INCOME-TAX>                    (3,868,024)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (3,868,024)
<EPS-BASIC>                   (226.89)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   0



</TABLE>
#### MANAYUNK NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL v. ZB OF ADJ et al.

360 CD 2017

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

10/03/2017

Philadelphia County Civil Division, 160700376

Quashed
#### COM. v. BURDEN, L., Jr.

1892 MDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/21/2017

CP-41-CR-0001472-2011, CP-41-CR-0001767-2011 (Lycoming)

Affirmed
No. 11-10388.

#### Olivo *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
No. 11-11132.

#### Dittmer *v.*Michigan Department of Corrections et al.

Ct. App. Mich. Certiorari denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 974 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 974

   To amend the Federal Reserve Act to require the Vice Chairman for 
Supervision of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System to 
           provide a written report, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 5, 2019

  Mr. Gottheimer (for himself and Mr. Lucas) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Federal Reserve Act to require the Vice Chairman for 
Supervision of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System to 
           provide a written report, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Reserve Supervision 
Testimony Clarification Act''.

SEC. 2. VICE CHAIRMAN FOR SUPERVISION REPORT REQUIREMENT.

    Paragraph (12) of section 10 of the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 
247b) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating such paragraph as paragraph (11); and
            (2) in such paragraph--
                    (A) by striking ``shall appear'' and inserting 
                ``shall provide written testimony and appear''; and
                    (B) by adding at the end the following: ``If, at 
                the time of any appearance described in this paragraph, 
                the position of Vice Chairman for Supervision is 
                vacant, the Chairman or their designee shall appear 
                instead and provide the required written testimony.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Galaxy  Nutritional  Foods, Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended  September  30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Christopher J. New, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C.  ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.



                                                  /s/ Christopher J. New
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Christopher J. New
                                                  Chief Executive Officer
                                                  July 16, 2003