alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350



The undersigned hereby certifies that the
Form 10-K/A Annual Report of Quaker Chemical Corporation (the “Company”) for the annual period ended December 31, 2018
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: July 24, 2019

|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                              
|/s/    MICHAEL F. BARRY                                       
|Michael F. Barry                                              
|Chief Executive Officer of Quaker Chemical
        Corporation
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8867 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to prohibit the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs from conducting medical research causing significant pain or 

distress to cats. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 3, 2020 

Ms. TITUS (for herself, Mr. MAST, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. FITZPATRICK, Mr. 

SUOZZI, Mr. TED LIEU of California, Mr. COHEN, Ms. SHALALA, Mrs. 

DINGELL, Mr. RODNEY DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. HARDER of California, Ms. 

LEE of California, Ms. NORTON, Mr. LYNCH, Mr. NADLER, Mr. 

CICILLINE, Mr. LEVIN of Michigan, Mr. LOWENTHAL, Ms. JAYAPAL, Ms. 

ESHOO, and Mr. HURD of Texas) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to prohibit the Secretary of Veterans Affairs from conducting medical research causing significant pain or distress to cats. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Cat Abuse in Testing 

5 Stops Act of 2020’’ or the ‘‘CATS Act of 2020’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8867 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AF2 FAIRS MEDICAL RESEARCH CAUSING SIG3 NIFICANT PAIN OR DISTRESS TO CATS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 7303 of title 38, United 

5 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol6 lowing new subsection: 

7 ‘‘(e)(1) In carrying out research, the Secretary may 

8 not purchase, breed, transport, house, feed, maintain, dis9 pose of, or experiment on cats as part of the conduct of 

10 any study that causes significant pain or distress. 

11 ‘‘(2) In this subsection, the term ‘study that causes 

12 significant pain or distress’ includes any study classified 

13 to pain category D or E by the Department of Agriculture 

14 (or such successor categories developed pursuant to sec15 tion 13 of the Animal Welfare Act (7 U.S.C. 2143)).’’. 

16 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

17 subsection (a) shall take effect 90 days after the date of 

18 enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
# C_2021217EN.01006601.xml

| 7.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/66 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/66

---

Action brought on 16 April 2021 — Kalita and Haas v EUIPO — Kitzbühel Tourismus (Representation of two animals)

(Case T-206/21)

(2021/C 217/83)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicants: Oliver Kalita (Jochberg, Austria) and Christian Haas (Kitzbühel, Austria) (represented by: G. Donath, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Kitzbühel Tourismus, Körperschaft des öffentlichen Rechts (Kitzbühel, Austria)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicants

Trade mark at issue: Application for registration of EU figurative mark (Representation of two animals) — Application for registration No 17 997 789

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 February 2021 in Case R 863/2020-1

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

in the alternative,

| — | alter the contested decision to the effect that the appeal is dismissed in its entirety and, consequently, reinstate the decision of the Opposition Division of EUIPO of 6 April 2020; |
| --- | --- |

—

alter the contested decision to the effect that the appeal is dismissed in its entirety and, consequently, reinstate the decision of the Opposition Division of EUIPO of 6 April 2020;

| — | in any event, order the defendant and/or the other party as a qualified intervener to pay all the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

in any event, order the defendant and/or the other party as a qualified intervener to pay all the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
# C_2022213EN.01002201.xml

| 30.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 213/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 213/22

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wiesbaden (Germany) lodged on 1 February 2022 — RL v Landeshauptstadt Wiesbaden

(Case C-61/22)

(2022/C 213/30)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Verwaltungsgericht Wiesbaden

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: RL

Defendant: Landeshauptstadt Wiesbaden

Questions referred

Does the obligation to take fingerprints and store them in identity cards in accordance with Article 3(5) of Regulation (EU) 2019/1157 (1) infringe higher-ranking EU law, in particular

| (a) | Article 77(3) TFEU, |
| --- | --- |

(a)

Article 77(3) TFEU,

| (b) | Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, |
| --- | --- |

(b)

Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,

| (c) | Article 35(10) of the General Data Protection Regulation, (2) |
| --- | --- |

(c)

Article 35(10) of the General Data Protection Regulation, (2)

and is it therefore invalid on one of those grounds?

---

(1)  Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 on strengthening the security of identity cards of Union citizens and of residence documents issued to Union citizens and their family members exercising their right of free movement (OJ 2019 L 188, p. 67).

(2)  Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (OJ 2016 L 119, p. 1).

---
#### COM. v. LYONS, T.

125 WDA 2017

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/29/2017

CP-25-CR-0000360-2016 (Erie)

Affirmed
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 909 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 909

 To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to provide parity among 
  States in the timing of the application of higher Federal Medicaid 
            matching rates for the ACA-expansion population.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 30, 2019

   Mr. Lewis (for himself, Ms. Sewell of Alabama, and Mr. Bishop of 
   Georgia) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to provide parity among 
  States in the timing of the application of higher Federal Medicaid 
            matching rates for the ACA-expansion population.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medicaid Expansion Parity Act of 
2019''.

SEC. 2. PARITY IN THE TIMING OF THE APPLICATION OF HIGHER MEDICAID 
              FEDERAL MATCHING RATES FOR ACA NEWLY ELIGIBLE 
              INDIVIDUALS.

    (a) In General.--Section 1905(y)(1) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1396d(y)(1)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``for calendar 
        quarters in 2014, 2015, and 2016'' and inserting ``for calendar 
        quarters in the 12-calendar-quarter period beginning with the 
        first calendar quarter in which the State provides medical 
        assistance to newly eligible individuals'';
            (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``for calendar 
        quarters in 2017'' and inserting ``for the next 4 calendar 
        quarters for such State'';
            (3) in subparagraph (C), by striking ``for calendar 
        quarters in 2018'' and inserting ``for the next 4 calendar 
        quarters for such State'';
            (4) in subparagraph (D), by striking ``for calendar 
        quarters in 2019'' and inserting ``for the next 4 calendar 
        quarters for such State''; and
            (5) in subparagraph (E), by striking ``for calendar 
        quarters in 2020 and each year thereafter'' and inserting ``for 
        each succeeding calendar quarter for such State''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect as if included in the enactment of the Patient Protection 
and Affordable Care Act.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2022326EN.01001301.xml

| 29.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/13

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht München (Germany) lodged on 1 July 2022 — Generalstaatsanwaltschaft München v HF

(Case C-435/22)

(2022/C 326/19)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberlandesgericht München

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Generalstaatsanwaltschaft München

Defendant: HF

Question referred

Must Article 54 of the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement of 14 June 1985 between the Governments of the States of the Benelux Economic Union, the Federal Republic of Germany and the French Republic on the gradual abolition of checks at their common borders, signed on 19 June 1990 in Schengen, read in conjunction with Article 50 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, (1) be interpreted as meaning that that those provisions preclude the extradition of a third-country national who is not an EU citizen in terms of Article 20 of the TFEU by the authorities of a contracting state to that Convention and an EU Member State to a third country if final judgment has been passed against the person concerned by another Member State of the European Union for the same offences to which the extradition request relates and that judgment has been enforced and where the decision to refuse to extradite that person to the third country would be possible only at the cost of breaching a bilateral extradition treaty that exists with that third country?

---

(1)  OJ 2000 C 364, p. 1.

---
No. 11-10721.

#### Doroteo *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME, THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS AND THE NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-04-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-02-1996
<CASH>                                           6,991
<SECURITIES>                                        90
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,363
<ALLOWANCES>                                       746
<INVENTORY>                                    103,193
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               116,463
<PP&E>                                          51,349
<DEPRECIATION>                                  27,311
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 148,137
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,860
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             3
<OTHER-SE>                                     115,274
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   115,277
<SALES>                                        147,308
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               147,308
<CGS>                                          115,646
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  115,646
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                40,689<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    10
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 998
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (9,073)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        85
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (9,158)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (9,158)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.35)
<FN>
<F1>OTHER EXPENSES CONSISTS OF ALL OPERATING COSTS AND EXCLUDES INTEREST,
NON-OPERATING INCOME AND INCOME TAXES.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
No. 11-10524.

#### Lopez *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-11080

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JONATHAN BERNARD SMITH,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:15-CR-148-1

Before JOLLY, WIENER, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Defendant-Appellant Jonathan Bernard Smith appeals his sentence for 

conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute a controlled substance. He 

complains that the district court erred when it increased his offense level by 

two levels pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(12) for maintaining a drug-related 

premises. Our review is for clear error. See United States v. Trujillo, 502 F.3d 

353, 356 (5th Cir. 2007). 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 5, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-11080 Document: 00513578262 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/05/2016
No. 15-11080

2

Smith contends that the court erred in finding that drug distribution was 

one of his primary or principal uses of the premises because he did not have a 

possessory interest in the premises or distribute drugs from inside, or control 

access to, the home. We need not decide this question because any error was 

harmless.

The district court stated that it would impose the same sentence 

regardless of whether it was correct regarding the premises enhancement. The 

district court explained that its sentence was based on Smith’s cooperation and 

the fact that he intended to engage in violence by robbing an undercover agent 

during a drug transaction. The court further explained that the sentence was 

appropriate to provide just punishment, to protect the public, and to provide 

deterrence. In light of the foregoing, any error was harmless. See United 

States v. Gutierrez-Mendez, 752 F.3d 418, 430 (5th Cir. 2014). 

AFFIRMED.

 Case: 15-11080 Document: 00513578262 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/05/2016
March
26, 2014


 


CONSENT
OF PINNACLE ENERGY SERVICES, LLC


 


We
consent to the references to our firm in the form and context in which they appear in the Form 10-K Annual Report of Osage Exploration
and Development, Inc. (the “Annual Report”). We hereby further consent to the inclusion in the Annual Report of estimates
of oil and gas reserves contained in our report entitled:


 


Osage
Exploration & Development, Inc. 


Reserves
and Economic Evaluation Year End 2013 


Effective:
December 31, 2013 


SEC
Pricing


 


and
to the inclusion of our report dated March 10, 2014 as an exhibit to the Annual Report.


  


	PINNACLE
    ENERGY SERVICES, LLC	 
	 	 
	/s/
    Richard J. Morrow	 
	Richard
    J. Morrow, P.E.	 
	Oklahoma
    City, Oklahoma	 
	March
    26,2014	 


  


	 	Very
    truly yours,
	 	 
	 	/s/
    J.P. Dick
	 	J.P.
    Dick, P.E.
	 	 
	 	PINNACLE
    ENERGY SERVICES, LLC
	 	TBPE
    Firm License No. F6204


 


Pinnacle
Energy Services, LLC


9420
Cedar Lake Ave, Oklahoma City, OK 73114


Ofc:
405-810-9151 Fax:405-843-4700 www.PinnacleEnergy.com
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
     I, Thomas A. Andruskevich, Chairman of the Board, President and ChiefExecutive Officer of Mayor’s Jewelers, Inc., certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Mayor’s Jewelers,Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and we have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent function):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: January 7, 2005 /s/ Thomas A. AndruskevichThomas A. AndruskevichChairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 46 (Monday, March 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 10882]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5851]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards; Subcommittee Meeting on 
Thermal Hydraulic Phenomena

    The ACRS Subcommittee on Thermal Hydraulic Phenomena will hold a 
meeting on March 28, 1997, Room T-2B3, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, 
Maryland.
    Most of the meeting will be closed to public attendance to discuss 
Westinghouse Electric Corporation proprietary information pursuant to 5 
U.S.C. 552b(c)(4).
    The agenda for the subject meeting shall be as follows:

Friday, March 28, 1997--8:30 a.m. Until the Conclusion of Business

    The Subcommittee will continue its review of the Westinghouse (W) 
Test and Analysis Program being conducted in support of the AP600 
design certification, especially the W approach for modeling long-term 
cooling accident scenarios using the W COBRA/TRAC code. The purpose of 
this meeting is to gather information, analyze relevant issues and 
facts, and to formulate proposed positions and actions, as appropriate, 
for deliberation by the full Committee.
    Oral statements may be presented by members of the public with the 
concurrence of the Subcommittee Chairman; written statements will be 
accepted and made available to the Committee. Electronic recordings 
will be permitted only during those portions of the meeting that are 
open to the public, and questions may be asked only by members of the 
Subcommittee, its consultants, and staff. Persons desiring to make oral 
statements should notify the cognizant ACRS staff engineer named below 
five days prior to the meeting, if possible, so that appropriate 
arrangements can be made.
    During the initial portion of the meeting, the Subcommittee, along 
with any of its consultants who may be present, may exchange 
preliminary views regarding matters to be considered during the balance 
of the meeting.
    The Subcommittee will then hear presentations by and hold 
discussions with representatives of the NRC staff, the Westinghouse 
Electric Corporation, their consultants, and other interested persons 
regarding this review.
    Further information regarding topics to be discussed, whether the 
meeting has been cancelled or rescheduled, the scheduling of sessions 
which are open to the public, the Chairman's ruling on requests for the 
opportunity to present oral statements and the time allotted therefor 
can be obtained by contacting the cognizant ACRS staff engineer, Mr. 
Paul A. Boehnert (telephone 301/415-8065) between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 
p.m. (EST). Persons planning to attend this meeting are urged to 
contact the above named individual one or two working days prior to the 
meeting to be advised of any potential changes to the agenda, etc., 
that may have occurred.

    Dated: March 4, 1997.
Sam Duraiswamy,
Chief, Nuclear Reactors Branch.
[FR Doc. 97-5851 Filed 3-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
No. 11-10486.

#### Gorbatova *v.*Greater Lynn Senior Services, Inc., *aka*GLSS, Inc.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.