alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-31Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I,Scott Epperson, certify that:

 

1. Ihave reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required tobe filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the GSMortgage Securities Trust 2015-GC28 (the "Exchange Act periodicreports");

 

2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, donot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other informationrequired to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this reportis included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in thisreport under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in theExchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligationsunder the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. Allof the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to beincluded in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB andExchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to thisreport, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances ofnoncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report onForm 10-K.

 

Ingiving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on informationprovided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

 

WellsFargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors,LLC, as Special Servicer, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee,Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator, WellsFargo Bank, National Association, as Custodian, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, asOperating Advisor, CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant,Berkeley Point Capital LLC d/b/a Newmark Knight Frank, as Primary Servicer,Computershare Trust Company, National Association, as Servicing FunctionParticipant for the Certificate Administrator, and Computershare Trust Company,National Association, as Servicing Function Participant for the Custodian.

 

 

 Dated:March 13, 2024

 

 

/s/Scott Epperson

ScottEpperson

ChiefExecutive Officer

(seniorofficer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
# Exhibit 21.2

# Puget Sound Energy, Inc.

# SUBSIDIARIES

|1. | GP Acquisition Corp.
          c/o James W. Eldredge 
          10885 N.E. Fourth Street, Suite 1200
          Bellevue, Washington  98004-5515
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. | Hydro Energy Development Corporation (HEDC)
          10885 N.E. Fourth Street, Suite 1200
          Bellevue, Washington  98004-5515
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|3. | LP Acquisition Corp. 
          c/o James W. Eldredge 
          10885 N.E. Fourth Street, Suite 1200
          Bellevue, Washington  98004-5515
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|4. | Puget Western, Inc. 
          19515 North Creek Parkway 
          Suite 310 
          Bothell, Washington  98011
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|5. | WNG CAP I, Inc. 
          c/o James W. Eldredge 
          10885 N.E. Fourth Street, Suite 1200
          Bellevue, Washington  98004-5515
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|6. | Rainier Receivables, Inc. 
          c/o James W. Eldredge 
          10885 N.E. Fourth Street, Suite 1200
          Bellevue, Washington  98004-5515
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8945 

To amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance 

Act to provide flexibility with the cost share for fire management assistance, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 10, 2020 

Mr. NEGUSE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act to provide flexibility with the cost 

share for fire management assistance, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Wildfire Recovery 

5 Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8945 IH

1 SEC. 2. FIRE MANAGEMENT ASSISTANCE COST SHARE. 

2 Section 420 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief 

3 and Emergency Assistance Act is amended by adding at 

4 the end the following: 

5 ‘‘(f) FEDERAL SHARE.—The Federal share of assist6 ance under this section shall be not less than 75 percent 

7 of the eligible cost, as set forth in the regulations, of such 

8 assistance.’’. 

9 SEC. 3. RULEMAKING. 

10 Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment 

11 of this Act, the President, acting through the Adminis12 trator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency and 

13 in consultation with the heads of relevant Federal depart14 ments and agencies, including the United States Forest 

15 Service and Department of Interior, shall conduct and 

16 complete a rulemaking to develop guidelines and a rule 

17 that establishes thresholds for cases in which the Federal 

18 cost share for section 420 of the Robert T. Stafford Dis19 aster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 

20 5187) may be increased. Such thresholds shall use a fire21 specific metric to determine fire damage referred to in 

22 subsection (a) of such section, and recommend a Federal 

23 cost share adjustment for fire damage that meets the es24 tablished thresholds. The Administrator shall follow all noVerDate Sep 11 2014 19:55 Dec 27, 2020 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H8945.IH H8945

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 8945 IH

1 tice and comment requirements set forth in section 553 

2 of title 5, United States Code, for such rulemaking. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 49 (Thursday, March 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 11917]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6368]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Reclamation


Conservation Advisory Group, Yakima River Basin Water Enhancement 
Project, Yakima, Washington

AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation, Interior.

action: Notice of meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: As required by the Federal Advisory Committee Act, notice is 
hereby given that the Conservation Advisory Group, Yakima River Basin 
Water Enhancement Project, Yakima, Washington, established by the 
Secretary of the Interior, will hold public meetings. The purpose of 
the Conservation Advisory Group is to provide technical advice and 
counsel to the Secretary and the State on the structure, 
implementation, and oversight of the Yakima River Basin Water 
Conservation Program.

DATES: Meetings will be held:
    <bullet> February 12 and 13, 1997, at the Bureau of Reclamation, 
1917 Marsh Road, Yakima, Washington, 9 a.m. to 4 p.m.
    <bullet> March 12 and 13, 1997, at the Bureau of Reclamation, 1917 
Marsh Road, Yakima, Washington, 9 a.m.-4 p.m.
    <bullet> April 17, 18, and 30, 1997, at the Bureau of Reclamation, 
1917 Marsh Road, Yakima, Washington, 9 a.m.-4 p.m.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Walt Fite, Program Manager, Yakima 
River Water Enhancement Project, P.O. Box 1749, Yakima, Washington 
98907; (509) 575-5848 extension 267.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Basin Conservation Program is structured 
to provide economic incentives with cooperative Federal, State, and 
local funding to stimulate the identification and implementation of 
structural and nonstructural cost-effective water conservation measures 
in the Yakima River basin. Improvements in the efficiency of water 
delivery and use will result in improved streamflows for fish and 
wildlife and improve the reliability of water supplies for irrigation.

    Dated: January 28, 1997.
James V. Cole,
Manager, Upper Columbia Area Office.
[FR Doc. 97-6368 Filed 3-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-94-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 48 (Wednesday, March 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 11462]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6183]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Notice of Intent to Repatriate Cultural Items from Arizona in the 
Possession of the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard 
University, Cambridge, MA

AGENCY: National Park Service

ACTION: Notice

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Notice is hereby given under the Native American Graves Protection 
and Repatriation Act, 25 U.S.C. 3005(a)(2), of the intent to repatriate 
a cultural item in the possession of the Peabody Museum of Archaeology 
and Ethnology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, which meets the 
definition of ``cultural patrimony'' under Section 2 of the Act.
    The cultural items are 20 yellow wooden sunflowers, five white 
wooden sunflowers, two leather sunflowers, 26 wooden cones, and one 
wooden bird.
    In 1915, Mr. Kidder and Mr. Guernsey excavated these cultural items 
from Sunflower Cave, Marsh Pass, AZ during an expedition sponsored by 
the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology. These items were 
accessioned into the Museum's collections the same year.
    Excavation records and anthropological sources indicate these items 
were likely deposited in Sunflower Cave during the Pueblo I period 
(750-975 AD). Consultation evidence presented by representatives of the 
Hopi Tribe on behalf of the Flute Clan practices and have ongoing 
historical, traditional, and cultural importance central to the Flute 
Clan and could not have been alienated by any individual.
    Officials of the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology have 
determined that, pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(3)(D), these 54 cultural 
items have ongoing historical, traditional, and cultural importance 
central to the culture itself, and could not have been alienated, 
appropriated, or conveyed by any individual. Officials of the Peabody 
Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology have also determined that, pursuant 
to 25 U.S.C. 3001(2), there is a relationship of shared group identity 
which can be reasonably traced between these items and the Flute Clan 
of Walpi, First Mesa, of the Hopi Tribe.
    This notice has been sent to officials of the Hopi Tribe. 
Representatives of any other Indian tribe that believes itself to be 
culturally affiliated with these objects should contact Mrs. Barbara 
Isaac, Assistant Director, Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, 
11 Divinity Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138, telephone (617) 495-2254 before 
April 11, 1997. Repatriation of these objects to the Hopi Tribe on 
behalf of the Flute Clan may begin after that date if no additional 
claimants come forward.
    Dated: March 7, 1997.
Francis P. McManamon,
Departmental Consulting Archeologist, Manager, Archeology and 
Ethnography Program.
[FR Doc. 97-6183 Filed 3-11-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-F
1 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

CRAIG A. KARSNITZ 1 The Circle, Suite 2 RESIDENT JUDGE GEORGETOWN, DE 19947

August 10 , 2022

James A. Biggins SBI # 319264 Unit W J ames T. Vaughn Correctional Center 1181 Paddock Road Smyrna, DE 19977

Re: State of Delaware v. James A. Biggins Def. ID No. 9609015504 Motion for Reconsideration of Postconviction Relief and Consolidated Motion for Discovery

Dear Mr. Biggins :
On May 11, 2022, you filed a Motion for Postconviction Relief and
Consolidated Motion for Discovery (collectively, the “Rule 61 Motion”). This was
not your first Rule 61 Motion. Under the Delaware Superior Court Rules of Criminal

Procedure, second or subsequent motions for po s tconviction relief are not permitted

unless , in the Rule 61 Motion, you plead with particularity new evidence creating a
strong inference of your actual innocence or a new rule of constitution al law that2

applies retroactively to your case and renders your convictions invalid. 1 Since y ou
pled neither of these in the Rule 61 Motion
, the Rule 61 Motion wa s procedurally

barred and I s ummar il y dismiss ed it on May 19, 2022

. 2

On May 31, 2022, your Motion for Reconsideration of Postconviction Relief
and Consolidated Motion for Discovery dated May 22, 2022 (the “Motion for
Reconsideration”) was filed with this Court. In the Motion for Reconsideration
, you
asked me to reconsider my dismissal of the Rule 61 Motion.
There is nothing for me to reconsider. The six grounds you state in your
Motion for Reconsideration have been presented and rejected before.

Mo reover, on August 23, 2021, I prohibited you from filing any matter with

this Court without first obtaining written approval based on your history of filing
numerous, meritless pleadings. 3 The Delaware Supreme Court ha s also prohibited

you from filing an y further papers challenging your convictions in this case without

a J ustice's prior approval. 4 Your repetitive, meritless and frequent filings are testing
the patience of this Court. I again prohibit you from such filings without first
obtaining written approval.

1 Super. Ct. Crim. R. 61(d)(2). 2 Super. Ct. Crim. R. 61(d)(5). 3 Letter of Craig A. Karsnitz to James A. Biggins dated August 23, 2021. 4 Biggins v. State
, 2011 WL 2731214, at *1 (Del. July 11, 2011)

.3

Fo r the reasons set forth above, the Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED

.
IT IS SO O RDERED

. Very truly yours,

/s/ Craig A. Karsnitz

cc: Prothonotary
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEETS, THE STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND THE STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          15,701
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,620
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,119
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,138
<PP&E>                                          13,428
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,154
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  43,390
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,305
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     19,832
<COMMON>                                           166
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,933
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    43,390
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,831
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,086
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,102
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (267)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    910
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                910
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       910
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 48 (Wednesday, March 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 11427]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6103]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP97-273-000]


Texas-Ohio Pipeline, Inc.; Notice of Petition for Waiver

March 6, 1997.
    Take notice that on March 3, 1997, Texas-Ohio Pipeline, Inc. 
(Texas-Ohio) tendered for filing a petition for waiver of the 
requirements of the Commission's Order No. 587-B.
    Texas-Ohio states that copies of the filing have been mailed to all 
of its jurisdictional customers and to affected state regulatory 
commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Regulations. All such motions or protests should be filed on or before 
March 13, 1997. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public 
inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-6103 Filed 3-11-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT 23.01

                                SCANA CORPORATION




INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
333-18973, 333-37398, and 333-97555 of SCANA Corporation on Forms S-8 and
Registration Statements No. 333-86803 and 333-68266 of SCANA Corporation on
Forms S-3 of our report dated February 26, 2004 (which report expresses an
unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph related to the
adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, "Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets," effective January 1, 2002 as discussed in Note 1)
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of SCANA Corporation for the year
ended December 31, 2003.





s/DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Columbia, South Carolina
February 26, 2004









<PAGE>



                                                                  EXHIBIT 23.02




                     SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC AND GAS COMPANY




INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-108760 of South Carolina Electric and Gas Company on Form S-3 of our report
dated February 26, 2004 appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of South
Carolina Electric and Gas Company for the year ended December 31, 2003.



s/DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Columbia, South Carolina
February 26, 2004























<PAGE>



                                                         EXHIBIT 23.03



             PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NORTH CAROLINA, INCORPORATED




INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-68516 of Public Service Company of North Carolina, Incorporated on Form S-3
of our report dated February 26, 2004 (which report expresses an unqualified
opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph related to the adoption of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, "Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets," effective January 1, 2002 as discussed in Note 1) appearing
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Public Service Company of North Carolina,
Incorporated for the year ended December 31, 2003.





s/DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Columbia, South Carolina
February 26, 2004
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of UST Liquidating Corporation. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Barry
S. Rosenstein, Co-Chairman of Board of Directors of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company. /s/ Barry S. RosensteinBarry S. RosensteinMay 14, 2004
    Co-Chairman of Board of Directors
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ruben GONZALES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-41709 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed March 14, 2018

*460Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Eden Flores, Sr., Pro Se

Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Ruben Gonzales has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Gonzales has filed a response. Gonzales’s request for appointment of new counsel is denied as untimely. *See United States v. Wagner,*158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir. 1998).

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Gonzales’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cíe. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.