alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>





                                                                   EXHIBIT 31.2


 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 15d-14(a) (17 CFR 240.15d-14(a)) AND SECTION 302
                       OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Robert Mayer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of ChrisKen Partners
Cash Income Fund L.P., a Delaware limited partnership;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(c) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; and
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report are conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation, and;
c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information, and;
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.


Date: May 17, 2004

/s/Robert Mayer
---------------
Robert Mayer
Acting Principal Accounting Officer
ChrisKen Income Properties, Inc.,
     Managing General Partner
ChrisKen Partners Cash Income Fund L.P.
2018 EAVS Data Brief: Michigan EAVS Jurisdictions 

83 

 Voter Registration 

Total Registered Voters, 

Nov. 20181 

7,471,088 

1 A1a of EAVS 

Registration Forms Received, 

E-Day 2016 – E-Day 20182 

2,262,301 

2 A3a of EAVS 

New Voters Registered, 

E-Day 2016 – E-Day 20183 

1,164,718 

3 A3b of EAVS 

Sources of Registration Forms4 

4 A4a-l of EAVS 

Mail/Fax/Email 148,876 

In-Person 222,228 

Online 195,864 

Motor Vehicle Office 1,676,663 

Public Assistance 

Office 17,665 

Disability Office 441 

Military Recruitment 

Office 564 

Other Non-NVRA 

Office 0 

Registration Drives 0 

Other Sources or Not 

Categorized 0 

 Voter Turnout 

Voters Participating by Mode5 

In-Person E-Day Other Mode 3,180,299 7,083 73% 0% 

In-Person Early 

98,136 

2% 

By Mail 

1,055,822 

25% 

5 In-person Election Day 

voters is F1b. By-mail voters 

is F1d+F1g. In-person early 

voters is F1f. Other mode is 

F1c+F1e+F1h. 

Total Turnout:6 4,341,340 

6 F1a of EAVS 

Provisional Voters:7 224 

7 F1e of EAVS 

UOCAVA Voters:8 6,859 

8 F1c of EAVS 

Election Technology 

Technology Used by Jurisdictions9 

83 83 83 

0 0 0 

DRE w/o DRE with Ballot Scanner Hand Electronic 

VVPAT VVPAT Marking Count Poll Book 

Device 



9 F3a-d, F5a-F8a, and 

F11a of EAVS 

Election Policies 

Has online voter registration10 

10 Q6 of Policy Survey 

Has a form of same-day voter registration (SDR)11 

11 Q7 of Policy Survey 

Has all-mail elections statewide12 

Has all-mail elections in certain jurisdictions12 

12 Q9a of Policy Survey 

✔ Allows voters to register as permanent absentee 

voters13 

✔ 13 Q10 of Policy Survey Requires excuse for by-mail voting14 

✔ Requires excuse for in-person early or in-person 14 Q8 of Policy Survey 

absentee voting15 15 Q12a of Policy Survey 

Uses vote centers16 16 Q13 of Policy Survey 

Notes 

EAVS data and reports may be downloaded at 

www.eac.gov. 

Responses of “Does not apply” and “Data not available”

are shown as zeroes.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                             MATERIAL SUBSIDIARIES

PCC Energy, Inc. (an Alberta, Canada corporation)

PCC Energy Corp. (an Alberta, Canada corporation)

PCC Energy Limited (an Alberta, Canada corporation)
(subsidiary of PCC Energy Corp.)
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion *

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-60387

Summary Calendar

KIREN KUMAR BHARTI, also known as Kirenkumar Satish Bharti,

Petitioner

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A75-780-661

Before JOLLY, WIENER, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Petitioner Kiren Kumar Bharti, a native and citizen of the United

Kingdom, petitions for a review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

(BIA). It found him ineligible for cancellation of removal because his second

1998 Mississippi conviction for simple possession of a controlled substance was

an aggravated felony for purposes of immigration law. 

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

November 16, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-60387

2

Bharti’s argument that Lopez v. Gonzales, 549 U.S. 47, 58-60 (2006),

overruled United States v. Sanchez-Villalobos, 412 F.3d 572, 576-77 (5th Cir.

2005), is unavailing. See Carachuri-Rosendo v. Holder, 570 F.3d 263, 266-68

(5th Cir. 2009), petition for cert. filed (July 15, 2009) (No. 09-60). Further, we

have rejected Bharti’s argument that a second or subsequent state offense

cannot be a felony under 21 U.S.C. § 844 unless the prosecutor gives notice

pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 851 of the intent to use a previous conviction to increase

the sentence. See United States v. Cepeda-Rios, 530 F.3d 333, 336 n.11 (5th Cir.

2008). Carachuri-Rosendo affirmed the continuing validity of Cepeda-Rios.

Carachuri-Rosendo, 570 F.3d at 266. Finally, in Carachuri-Rosendo we rejected

Bharti’s argument that a second possession offense that renders an alien an

aggravated felon must have been prosecuted under a state recidivism law for it

to be considered an aggravated felony for immigration purposes. See id. at 268.

Under Carachuri-Rosendo, Bharti is considered to have committed an

aggravated felony for immigration purposes because, since his admission to the

United States, he has been convicted on more than one occasion of possession of

a controlled substance. See id. at 266; § 844(a). Bharti is therefore ineligible for

cancellation of removal. See Carachuri-Rosendo, 570 F.3d at 266-68; 8 U.S.C.

§ 1229b(a).

PETITION DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 48 (Wednesday, March 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 11423]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6119]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP97-19-003]


Mojave Pipeline Company; Notice of Request for Waiver

March 6, 1997.
    Take notice that on March 3, 1997, Mojave Pipeline Company (Mojave) 
submitted a request for waiver of Order Nos. 587, et seq., and ordering 
paragraph (A) of the Commission's order issued February 18, 1997 in 
these proceedings to permit Mojave to delay implementation of the Gas 
Industry Standards Board Standards from April 1, 1997 until June 1, 
1997.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests should be filed 
on or before March 13, 1997. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this 
filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public 
inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-6119 Filed 3-11-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Paul C. Honda, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports
on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Honda Auto Receivables 2015-1
Owner Trust (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);



2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports,
taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing
and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange
Act periodic reports;



4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by
the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required
in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has
fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and



5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act
Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material
instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.



In giving the certifications above, I have
reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank National Association.



Date: June 10, 2016



|/s/ Paul C. Honda                                    | 
|---------------------------------------------------- | 
|Paul C. Honda                                       
|Vice President and Assistant Secretary              
|American Honda Finance Corporation                  
|(senior officer in charge of the servicing function)
# C_2023063EN.01001901.xml

| 20.2.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.2.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/19

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 25 October 2022 — T GmbH v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Spittal an der Drau

(Case C-671/22)

(2023/C 63/24)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Verwaltungsgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant on a point of law: T GmbH

Respondent authority: Bezirkshauptmannschaft Spittal an der Drau

Questions referred

| 1. | Is point 1.2.2 of Annex V (Definitions for high, good and moderate ecological status in lakes) to Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy (1) to be interpreted as meaning that ‘disturbed conditions’ in the ‘biological quality elements’ table, ‘fish fauna’ row, ‘high status’ column refer exclusively to anthropogenic impacts on physico-chemical and hydromorphological quality elements?
  If Question 1 is answered in the negative: |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is point 1.2.2 of Annex V (Definitions for high, good and moderate ecological status in lakes) to Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy (1) to be interpreted as meaning that ‘disturbed conditions’ in the ‘biological quality elements’ table, ‘fish fauna’ row, ‘high status’ column refer exclusively to anthropogenic impacts on physico-chemical and hydromorphological quality elements?

If Question 1 is answered in the negative:

| 2. | Is the aforementioned provision to be interpreted as meaning that if a biological quality element ‘fish fauna’ deviates from ‘high status’ as a result of disturbed conditions other than anthropogenic impacts on physico-chemical and hydromorphological quality elements, the biological quality element ‘fish fauna’ also cannot be classified as having ‘good status’ or ‘moderate status’? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Is the aforementioned provision to be interpreted as meaning that if a biological quality element ‘fish fauna’ deviates from ‘high status’ as a result of disturbed conditions other than anthropogenic impacts on physico-chemical and hydromorphological quality elements, the biological quality element ‘fish fauna’ also cannot be classified as having ‘good status’ or ‘moderate status’?

---

(1)  OJ 2000 L 327, p. 1.

---
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF

THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Keith C. Regnante, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Wave Life Sciences Ltd.
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 27, 2018



|                                                                                      
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Keith C. Regnante                                                                 
|Keith C. Regnante                                                                     
|Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer and
principal accounting officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9

<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           9,550,000
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                                   0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                10,725,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                         0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     48,556,000
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          40,438,000
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            40,652,000
<LOANS>                                        169,106,000
<ALLOWANCE>                                      4,628,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 285,727,000
<DEPOSITS>                                     249,760,000
<SHORT-TERM>                                     1,677,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,993,000
<LONG-TERM>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         8,107,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,190,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 285,727,000
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 14,417,000
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                4,759,000
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   558,000
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                19,734,000
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               6,268,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,297,000
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           13,437,000
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      480,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 (14,000)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 10,028,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,111,000
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,205,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,205,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .38
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                        5.27
<LOANS-NON>                                        745,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                       112,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 1,475,000
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  2,420,000
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 5,115,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,101,000
<RECOVERIES>                                       134,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                4,628,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             4,628,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                                  0




</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.4
 
             CERTIFICATE OF DESIGNATION OF CUMULATIVE CONVERTIBLE
                    PREFERRED STOCK, SERIES G - SUBSERIES I

     Tim B. Tarrillion and Judith Knight Shields do hereby certify that they are
the President and Assistant Secretary, respectively, of North American
Technologies Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (hereinafter referred to as the
"Corporation" or the "Company"); that, pursuant to the Corporation's Restated
Certificate of Incorporation, Section 151 of the Delaware General Corporation
Law and the Master Certificate of Designation relating to the Company's
Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, Series G (the "Master Certificate of
Designation"); the Board of Directors of the Corporation adopted the following
resolutions on March 31, 1997; and that none of the Series G Cumulative
Convertible Preferred Stock - Subseries I has been issued.

     Pursuant to the terms of the Master Certificate of Designation, there is
hereby created a subseries of Preferred Stock designated as Cumulative
Convertible Preferred Stock, Series G - Subseries I (the "Series G Preferred -
Subseries I"), which shall consist of 21,000 shares.  The Series G Preferred-
Subseries I shall have the preferences, voting powers, relative, participating,
optional or other special rights and privileges, and the qualifications,
limitations and restrictions as provided below and as provided in the Master
Certificate of Designation.

     The initial conversion price (the "Conversion Price") of the Series G
Preferred - Subseries I shares shall be $.45.  The Conversion Price shall be
subject to adjustment pursuant to the terms of the Master Certificate of
Designation.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Certificate of Designation
of Subseries to be duly executed by its President and attested to by its
Assistant Secretary, this 2nd day of April, 1997.



                                        NORTH AMERICAN TECHNOLOGIES, GROUP, INC.


                                        /s/ Tim B. Tarrillion
                                        _____________________________________
DATE: April 2, 1997                     Tim B. Tarrillion, 
     _______________                    President and Chief Executive Officer


DATE: April 2, 1997                     /s/ Judith Knight Shields
     ______________                     _____________________________________
                                        Judith Knight Shields, 
                                        Assistant Secretary
Bureau of Labor Statistics

**Series Id: Series title:**  **Labor force status: Type of data:**  **Age: Years:**  **Year Qtr1**  **Qtr2 Qtr3**  **Qtr4 Annual**  **2011** 24276 Employed part time (persons who usually work Number in thousands 20 years and over 2011 to 2011 

### Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey **Original Data Value** LNU02600024Q **Not Seasonally Adjusted** (Unadj) Employed, Usually W ork Part Time - 20

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Generated on: May 16, 2011 (02:07:52 PM)
# C_2023179EN.01001303.xml

| 22.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/13

---

Appeal brought on 18 July 2022 by KP against the order of the President of the General Court delivered on 19 May 2022 in Case T-140/22 AJ, KP v Council of the European Union, European Commission, European External Action Service (EEAS) and Eulex Kosovo

(Case C-491/22 P)

(2023/C 179/21)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: KP (represented by: P. Koutrakos, dikigoros, F. Randolph, advocaat, and J. Stojsavljevic-Savic, Solicitor)

Other parties to the proceedings: Council of the European Union, European Commission, European External Action Service (EEAS), Eulex Kosovo

By order of 31 March 2023, the Court of Justice (Sixth Chamber) held that the appeal was dismissed due to a manifest lack of jurisdiction of the Court and that KP should bear her own costs.

---