alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE COMPANY FOR THE NINE MONTHS
ENDED APRIL 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM
10-QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED APRIL 30, 1997.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       1,807,270
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  633,273
<ALLOWANCES>                                    12,000
<INVENTORY>                                     33,962
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,868,923
<PP&E>                                       5,122,545
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,092,722
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,358,206
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,663,210
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          857,333
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        31,545
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,734,373
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,358,206
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,916,217
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,790,152
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                69,527
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,469
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                235,008
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            235,008
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   235,008
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.2

16115 N.W. 52nd Avenue
Miami, Florida 33014-9317
Fax 305.624.5258
e-mail: flanders@allamerican.com
                                                             [All American Logo]
305.626.4149

Howard L. Flanders
Executive Vice President
Chief Financial Officer

June 30, 2000

VIA FACSIMILE (212) 421-1278

The Equity Group, Inc.
800 Third Avenue, 36th Floor
New York, NY 10022
Attn.: Robert D. Goldstein, President

RE:      EXTENSION BY ALL AMERICAN SEMICONDUCTOR, INC. ("SEMI") OF THE WARRANT
         TO PURCHASE 9,000 POST-SPLIT SHARES (45,000 PRE-SPLIT SHARES) OF SEMI'S
         COMMON STOCK AT AN EXERCISE PRICE OF $12.50 POST-SPLIT ($2.50
         PRE-SPLIT) PER SHARE (THE "WARRANT")

Dear Bob:

         This letter agreement sets forth our understanding with respect to the
extension of the expiration date of the Warrant granted to The Equity Group,
Inc. ("Equity") pursuant to paragraph 3(b) of the Consulting Agreement dated
July 1, 1995 between Equity and SEMI from June 30, 2000 to December 31, 2000.

         In consideration of SEMI's extension of the expiration date of the
Warrant, Equity hereby agrees and confirms that the only registration rights
associated with the Warrant are piggy-back registration rights. In addition,
Equity agrees in the event that SEMI should at any time decide to do any type of
underwriting that would include a registration of the shares underlying the
Warrant, then Equity will enter into an underwriting agreement which will
include, among other things, appropriate provisions indemnifying the underwriter
and Equity will agree to restrictions for any reasonable lock-up period
requested by the underwriter.

<PAGE>

Robert D. Goldstein
June 30, 2000
Page 2

If you agree with the foregoing, please confirm your agreement by executing and
returning a fully-executed copy to me via facsimile and the original by regular
mail. This letter agreement will be effective as of June 30, 2000 when agreed to
and accepted by Equity.

Very truly yours,


/s/ HOWARD L. FLANDERS
----------------------
HLF/ggb

Agreed to and Accepted by
The Equity Group, Inc.

By: /s/ ROBERT D. GOLDSTEIN
    -----------------------
    Robert D. Goldstein
    President
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 48 (Wednesday, March 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11522-11523]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6330]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF PEACE


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY: United States Institute of Peace.

    Date/Time: Thursday, March 20, 1997, 9:00 a.m.-5:30 p.m.
    Location: 1550 M Street, NW, M Street Lobby Conference Room, 
Washington, DC 20005.
    Status: Open Session-Portions may be closed pursuant to Subsection 
(c) of Section 552(b) of Title 5, United States Code, as provided in 
subsection 1706(h)(3) of the United States Institute of Peace Act, 
Public Law 98-525.
    Agenda: March Board Meeting; Approval of Minutes of the Seventy-
ninth Meeting of the Board of Directors;

[[Page 11523]]

Chairman's Report; President's Report; Committee Reports; Selection of 
1997-1988 Jennings Randolph Fellows; Selection of Solicited Grants; 
Building and Space Plans; Other General Issues.
    Contact: Dr. Sheryl Brown, Director, Office of Communications, 
Telephone: (202) 457-1700.

    Dated: March 10, 1997.
Charles E. Nelson,
Vice President for Management and Finance, United States Institute of 
Peace.
[FR Doc. 97-6330 Filed 3-10-97; 10:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-AR-M
# C_2022303EN.01005701.xml

| 8.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 303/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 303/57

---

Action brought on 27 June 2022 — Montanari v EUCAP Sahel Niger

(Case T-371/22)

(2022/C 303/73)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Marco Montanari (Reggio Emilia, Italy) (represented by: S. Rodrigues and A. Champetier, lawyers)

Defendant: EUCAP Sahel Niger (Niamey, Niger)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare the present action admissible and well founded; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare the present action admissible and well founded;

consequently,

| — | annul the decision of 28 April 2022, in so far as it rejects the applicant’s claim for compensation dated 4 February 2022; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of 28 April 2022, in so far as it rejects the applicant’s claim for compensation dated 4 February 2022;

| — | order the defendant to pay compensation for non-material and financial harm valued respectively, ex aequo et bono, at EUR 10 000 and EUR 964 800; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay compensation for non-material and financial harm valued respectively, ex aequo et bono, at EUR 10 000 and EUR 964 800;

| — | order the defendant to pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay all the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging failure to uphold the worker’s right to health and dignity, and alleging acts of psychological harassment suffered by the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging failure to uphold the worker’s right to health and dignity, and alleging acts of psychological harassment suffered by the applicant.

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging an infringement of the right to sound administration and the duty of care. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging an infringement of the right to sound administration and the duty of care.

---
# C_2023071EN.01001801.xml

| 27.2.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 71/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.2.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 71/18

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus (Finland) lodged on 9 December 2022 — EP v Maahanmuuttovirasto

(Case C-752/22)

(2023/C 71/21)

Language of the case: Finnish

Referring court

Korkein hallinto-oikeus

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: EP

Defendant: Maahanmuuttovirasto

Questions referred

| 1. | Does Directive 2003/109/EC (1) concerning the status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents apply to the deportation from the European Union of a person who entered the territory of a Member State during the period of validity of an entry ban imposed on him, whose stay in the Member State was therefore illegal under national law and who did not apply for a residence permit in that Member State if the person has been issued with a long-term residence permit for third-country nationals in another Member State?
  If the first question is answered in the affirmative: |
| --- | --- |

1.

Does Directive 2003/109/EC (1) concerning the status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents apply to the deportation from the European Union of a person who entered the territory of a Member State during the period of validity of an entry ban imposed on him, whose stay in the Member State was therefore illegal under national law and who did not apply for a residence permit in that Member State if the person has been issued with a long-term residence permit for third-country nationals in another Member State?

If the first question is answered in the affirmative:

| 2. | Are Article 12(1) and (3) and Article 22(3) of Directive 2003/109/EC concerning the status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents, so far as their subject matter is concerned, so unconditional and sufficiently precise that they can be relied upon by a third-country national against a Member State? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Are Article 12(1) and (3) and Article 22(3) of Directive 2003/109/EC concerning the status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents, so far as their subject matter is concerned, so unconditional and sufficiently precise that they can be relied upon by a third-country national against a Member State?

---

(1)  Council Directive 2003/109/EC of 25 November 2003 concerning the status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents (OJ 2004 L 16, p. 44).

---
#### EICHELBERGER, N. v. AZEMAR, M.

3543 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/20/2017

2014-C-1098

2014-C-4015

(Lehigh)

Affirmed
# C_2022482EN.01000502.xml

| 19.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 482/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 482/5

---

Appeal brought on 15 September 2022 by Jean-Marc Colombani against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 6 July 2022 in Case T-129/21, Colombani v EEAS

(Case C-595/22 P)

(2022/C 482/08)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Jean-Marc Colombani (represented by: N. de Montigny, avocate)

Other party to the proceedings: European External Action Service (EEAS)

Form of order sought by the appellant

The appellant claims that the Court should:

Allow the appeal and set aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 6 July 2022 in Case T-129/21, Colombani v EEAS;

Hear the case and:

| — | annul the EEAS decision of 17 April 2020 rejecting the appellant’s application for the post of Director for North Africa and Middle East (vacancy notice 2020/48); |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the EEAS decision of 17 April 2020 rejecting the appellant’s application for the post of Director for North Africa and Middle East (vacancy notice 2020/48);

| — | annul the EEAS decision of 6 July 2020 rejecting the appellant’s application for the post of Head of the Delegation of the European Union to Canada (vacancy notice 2020/134); |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the EEAS decision of 6 July 2020 rejecting the appellant’s application for the post of Head of the Delegation of the European Union to Canada (vacancy notice 2020/134);

Order the defendant at first instance to pay the costs incurred by the appellant on appeal and at first instance.

Grounds of appeal and main arguments

In support of his appeal, the appellant relies on two grounds.

By his first ground of appeal, the appellant claims that the General Court committed several errors when it ruled that the application for annulment of the decision of 17 April 2020 was inadmissible.

When it considered that the appellant, by way of the mutual agreement of 9 February 2021 concluded with the EEAS in Case T-507/20, Colombani v EEAS, agreed to waive the right to challenge the decision rejecting his application for the post of Director, the General Court (i) erred in law in its interpretation of the agreement; (ii) ruled infra petita; (iii) failed to have regard to the appellant’s interest in obtaining an annulment of the contested decision; and (iv) erred in its analysis of the conditions to be fulfilled in order to claim that there was a defect in the appellant’s consent at the time when the agreement was signed.

By his second ground of appeal, the appellant alleges that the General Court infringed his procedural rights by limiting the examination of the merits of the case to the decision of 6 July 2020 alone, thereby excluding an analysis of the substantive pleas in so far as they also concern the decision of 17 April 2020.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1996, AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,189
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     82,867
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               104,056
<PP&E>                                         161,114
<DEPRECIATION>                                  55,332
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 221,350
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          508,475
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,837
<OTHER-SE>                                   (300,630)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   221,350
<SALES>                                        728,123
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               728,123
<CGS>                                          209,839
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  641,694
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,014
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (124,424)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (124,424)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (124,424)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.00)
        

</TABLE>
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 9042 

To amend the Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965 to 

prohibit the Secretary of Commerce from issuing certain grants to States 

or political subdivisions of States that restrict or prohibit indoor and 

outdoor dining, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 21, 2020 

Mr. BUDD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee 

on Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Public Works and Economic Development 

Act of 1965 to prohibit the Secretary of Commerce from 

issuing certain grants to States or political subdivisions 

of States that restrict or prohibit indoor and outdoor 

dining, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Save our Servers Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 9042 IH

1 SEC. 2. INDOOR AND OUTDOOR DINING RESTRICTION. 

2 Title II of the Public Works and Economic Develop3 ment Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 3141 et seq.) is amended 

4 by adding at the end the following: 

5 ‘‘SEC. 219. INDOOR AND OUTDOOR DINING RESTRICTION. 

6 ‘‘Notwithstanding any other provision of this title, 

7 during the period in which a State, or a political subdivi8 sion of such State, has passed and is enforcing a law or 

9 order restricting or prohibiting indoor or outdoor dining 

10 at restaurants, the Secretary may not issue a grant under 

11 section 203(a), 205(b), or 207(a) to such State or a polit12 ical subdivision of such State.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
#### ARMSTRONG CO. MEMORIAL HOSPITAL v. DPW

438 MD 2012

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

10/16/2017

Original Jurisdiction

Dismissed
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
retail equity partners limited partnership financial statements as of
and for the nine months ended September 30, 1995 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                          44,053
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   70,076
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (7,400)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               258,782
<PP&E>                                      16,407,921
<DEPRECIATION>                             (3,060,188)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,694,421
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          297,462
<BONDS>                                     12,851,888
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     545,071
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,694,421
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,278,225
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  637,566
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                51,626
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (4,431)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             856,337
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (271,735)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (271,735)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (271,735)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.81)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# C_2022472EN.01004801.xml

| 12.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 472/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 472/48

---

Action brought on 27 October 2022 — moderne Stadt v EUIPO (DEUTZER HAFEN KÖLN)

(Case T-657/22)

(2022/C 472/56)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: moderne Stadt Gesellschaft zur Förderung des Städtebaues und der Gemeindeentwicklung mbH (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: G. Simon and L. Daams, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘DEUTZER HAFEN KÖLN’ — Application No 18 401 434

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 August 2022 in Case R 2196/2021-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) read in conjunction with Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) read in conjunction with Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) read in conjunction with Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) read in conjunction with Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of the principle of equal treatment. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of the principle of equal treatment.

---
No. 11-10268.

#### Russo *v.*Atchison.

Sup. Ct. Ill. Certiorari denied.