alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF NORTHLAND CRANBERRIES, INC. AS OF AND FOR
THE PERIOD ENDED MAY 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1996
<CASH>                                             182
<SECURITIES>                                     1,260
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,736
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      9,829
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,143
<PP&E>                                         131,925
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,572
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 138,910
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,311
<BONDS>                                         41,685
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            67
<OTHER-SE>                                      59,850
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   138,910
<SALES>                                         31,299
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                32,359
<CGS>                                           13,748
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,108
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,998
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,505
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,931
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,574
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,574
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.55
        

</TABLE>
IB 

Union Calendar No. 22 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 986 

[Report No. 116–44, Part I] 

To provide that certain guidance related to waivers for State innovation 

under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act shall have no 

force or effect. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 6, 2019 

Ms. KUSTER of New Hampshire (for herself, Mr. BEYER, and Mr. COURTNEY) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and 

Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

APRIL 30, 2019 

Additional sponsors: Mr. WELCH, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Ms. CASTOR of Florida, 

Mr. GOLDEN, Ms. BLUNT ROCHESTER, Mrs. DINGELL, Mr. KENNEDY, 

Mr. RUSH, Mr. RUIZ, Mr. PALLONE, Ms. ESHOO, Ms. MATSUI, Mr. VAN

DREW, Ms. CLARKE of New York, Ms. MCCOLLUM, Mr. SCHRADER, and 

Ms. MUCARSEL-POWELL

APRIL 30, 2019 

Reported from the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

APRIL 30, 2019 

Committee on Ways and Means discharged; committed to the Committee of 

the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 986 RH

A BILL 

To provide that certain guidance related to waivers for State 

innovation under the Patient Protection and Affordable 

Care Act shall have no force or effect. 


amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 986 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Americans 

5 with Preexisting Conditions Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROVIDING THAT CERTAIN GUIDANCE RELATED TO 

7 WAIVERS FOR STATE INNOVATION UNDER 

8 THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORD9 ABLE CARE ACT SHALL HAVE NO FORCE OR 

10 EFFECT. 

11 Beginning April 1, 2019, the Secretary of Health and 

12 Human Services and the Secretary of the Treasury may 

13 not take any action to implement, enforce, or otherwise 

14 give effect to the guidance entitled ‘‘State Relief and Em15 powerment Waivers’’ (83 Fed. Reg. 53575 (October 24, 

16 2018)), and the Secretaries may not promulgate any sub17 stantially similar guidance or rule. 


amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 22 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 986 

[Report No. 116–44, Part I] 

A BILL 

To provide that certain guidance related to waivers 

effect. and Affordable Care Act shall have no force or for State innovation under the Patient Protection 

APRIL 30, 2019 

Reported from the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

APRIL 30, 2019 

Committee on Ways and Means discharged; committed to 

Union and ordered to be printed the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the 


amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2

      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


      Pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  1350, the undersigned  officer
of  Harold's Stores, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby  certifies
that  the  Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q  for  the
quarter  ended April 29, 2006 (the "Report") fully  complies
with  the  requirements  of  Section  13(a)  or  15(d),   as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and  that
the information contained in the Report fairly presents,  in
all  material respects, the financial condition and  results
of operations of the Company.

Date:  June 13, 2006          /s/Jodi Taylor
                              Jodi Taylor
                              Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 10.38
                                                                 
                     REYNOLDS METALS COMPANY
             NEW MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE DEFERRAL PLAN



          Section 2.09 of the Reynolds Metals Company New

Management Incentive Deferral Plan is hereby amended effective

January 1, 1996, to read in its entirety as follows:



               2.09  "Incentive Compensation" shall mean the cash
     incentive payable to Eligible Employees under the Company's
     Performance Incentive Plan and/or its Supplemental Incentive
     Plan.




          Executed and adopted as of January 1, 1996, pursuant to

action taken by the Board of Directors of Reynolds Metals Company

at its meeting on November 17, 1995.

                              REYNOLDS METALS COMPANY



                              By: F. Robert Newman
                                  Vice President, Human Resources





F:\LJA\EXECCOMP\NEWMIDP\AM-01-01.996
# C_2022398EN.01002601.xml

| 17.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 398/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 398/26

---

Order of the General Court of 29 July 2022 — Santos v EUIPO (Shape of a citrus press)

(Case T-51/22) (1)

(Action for annulment - EU trade mark - Application for a three-dimensional EU trade mark - Shape of a citrus press - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctiveness - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Decision adopted following the revocation of an earlier decision - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2022/C 398/30)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Santos (Vaulx-en-Velin, France) (represented by: C. Bey, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Hanf, acting as Agent)

Re:

By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 29 November 2021 (Case R 281/2020-1).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law.

| 2. | Santos is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Santos is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 119, 14.3.2022.

---
Submitted May 5,

reversed June 28, 2017

#### In the Matter of C. A. S., a Person Alleged to have a Mental Illness. STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*C. A. S., *Appellant.*

Marion County Circuit Court

16CC05344; A163020

396 P3d 994

Joseph DeBin and Multnomah Defenders, Inc., filed the brief for appellant.

Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Rolf C. Moan, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Armstrong, Presiding Judge, and Tookey, Judge, and Shorr, Judge.

*519PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing him for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant contends that the state failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that, because of a mental disorder, he is unable to provide for his basic needs, ORS 426.005(l)(f)(B), or that he met the expanded criteria for mental illness, ORS 426.005(l)(f)(C). The state concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient to support appellant’s involuntary commitment on those bases and that the judgment should be reversed. We agree, accept the state’s concession, and reverse the judgment of commitment.

Reversed.
Fw: Call to discuss SOx NAAQS

Michael Stewart to: Tricia Crabtree 05/24/2010 11:05 AM

Michael J. Stewart, Ph.D.

Environmental Protection Specialist

Health and Environmental Impacts Division

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

(919) 541-7524

stewart.michael@epa.gov

----- Forwarded by Michael Stewart/RTP/USEPA/US on 05/24/2010 11:05 AM -----

RE: Call to discuss SOx NAAQS 

Lydia Wegman to: Laity, James A. 05/24/2010 10:59 AM

Cc: Bridgid Curry, Charlotte Bertrand, "Mancini, Dominic J.", Karen 

Martin, "Schwab, Margo", Michael Stewart

Thanks Jim. 

"Laity, James A." Thanks Lydia, waiting to hear back from Margo o... 05/24/2010 10:57:23 AM

From: "Laity, James A." <James_A._Laity@omb.eop.gov>

To: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Bridgid Curry/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Charlotte Bertrand/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, "Mancini, Dominic 

J." <Dominic_J._Mancini@omb.eop.gov>, Karen Martin/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Michael 

Stewart/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, "Schwab, Margo" <Margo_Schwab@omb.eop.gov>

Date: 05/24/2010 10:57 AM

Subject: RE: Call to discuss SOx NAAQS

Thanks Lydia, waiting to hear back from Margo on her schedule.  The tight time schedule on this major

rule is frustrating for us as well.  We are all doing the best we can.  ‐‐ jim

From: Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 10:55 AM

To: Laity, James A.

Cc: Curry.Bridgid@epamail.epa.gov; Bertrand.Charlotte@epamail.epa.gov; Mancini, Dominic J.; 

Martin.Karen@epamail.epa.gov; Stewart.Michael@epamail.epa.gov

Subject: Re: Call to discuss SOx NAAQS

To state the obvious, it is frustrating to receive these comments ten days before the rule needs to be 

signed and then to find we can't discuss them with you until tomorrow. We will be raising the issues to 

our management today and it would have been helpful to have some understanding of the rationale for 

your positions. Be that as it may, I can be available tomorrow between 9:30-10:30 tomorrow morning. 

Please let me know if you and Margo can be available at that time. Thanks. 

From: "Laity, James A." <James_A._Laity@omb.eop.gov>
To: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Charlotte Bertrand/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, "Mancini, Dominic J." <Dominic_J._Mancini@omb.eop.gov>, Bridgid 

Curry/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 05/24/2010 10:14 AM

Subject

:

Call to discuss SOx NAAQS

Lydia, Just remembered that Margo is out of the office today.  Will set up a call for tomorrow am.  What is your

availability?  ‐‐ jim

From: Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 9:45 AM

To: Laity, James A.

Cc: Bertrand.Charlotte@epamail.epa.gov

Subject: I just picked up your message from Friday about the SO2 package 

 

Hi Jim,

I didn't check my voicemail on Friday or over the weekend, so did not get your message until now. Can 

you please call me at the office? Needless to say, I would like to hear what your "major ask" is on the 

SO2 package. My number is 919-541-5505. I can't find your office number and didn't get an answer on 

your cell, so I'll wait to hear from you. Thanks. 

Lydia
# C_2022207EN.01005202.xml

| 23.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 207/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 207/52

---

Action brought on 4 April 2022 — Novartis v EUIPO — AstraZeneca (BREZTREV)

(Case T-174/22)

(2022/C 207/69)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Novartis AG (Basel, Switzerland) (represented by: A. Nordemann-Schiffel, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: AstraZeneca AB (Södertälje, Sweden)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark BREZTREV — Application for registration No 18 088 373

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 January 2022 in Case R 738/2021-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
# C_2022451EN.01001801.xml

| 28.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 451/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 451/18

---

Action brought on 4 October 2022 — CMB v Commission

(Case T-619/22)

(2022/C 451/22)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicant: CMB Colorex Master Batches BV (Helmond, Netherlands) (represented by: M. Wolf, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

| — | Annulment of Commission Decision C(2022) 5829 final of 5 August 2022 relating to the recovery by 16 August 2022 of a principal sum of EUR 125 166,68 plus interest in the amount of EUR 24 592,68 or in total an amount of EUR 149 759,36 from CMB Colorex Master Batches. |
| --- | --- |

—

Annulment of Commission Decision C(2022) 5829 final of 5 August 2022 relating to the recovery by 16 August 2022 of a principal sum of EUR 125 166,68 plus interest in the amount of EUR 24 592,68 or in total an amount of EUR 149 759,36 from CMB Colorex Master Batches.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law: the claim has already been paid. |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law: the claim has already been paid.

| 2. | Second plea in law: infringement of the Treaties or of any rule of law relating to their application.






  — | the claim is, according to the applicable provisions of European law, time-barred. |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law: infringement of the Treaties or of any rule of law relating to their application.

—

the claim is, according to the applicable provisions of European law, time-barred.

| 3. | Third plea in law: the claim was determined incorrectly.






  — | the contested decision was prepared carelessly. |
| --- | --- | --- |

3.

Third plea in law: the claim was determined incorrectly.

—

the contested decision was prepared carelessly.

---
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8992 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to provide for certain 

succession reforms, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 16, 2020 

Miss RICE of New York introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Homeland Security 

A BILL 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to provide 

for certain succession reforms, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SUCCESSION REFORMS. 

4 Subsection (g) of section 103 of the Homeland Secu5 rity Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 113) is amended— 

6 (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘neither the 

7 Secretary nor Deputy Secretary is’’ and inserting 

8 ‘‘the Secretary, Deputy Secretary, and Associate 

9 Secretary are not’’; and 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8992 IH

1 (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘designate 

2 such other officers of the Department in further 

3 order of succession to serve as Acting Secretary.’’ 

4 and inserting ‘‘designate— 

5 ‘‘(A) such other official of the Department 

6 in further order of succession to serve as Acting 

7 Secretary in a manner that requires such offi8 cial to have served in the Department for at 

9 least 90 days prior to such designation in either 

10 the position of the head of a component or in 

11 another position by and with the advice and 

12 consent of the Senate, or in the event that an 

13 official satisfying such criteria is not available, 

14 in a manner that requires such official to have 

15 served for at least 90 days prior to such des16 ignation in the Senior Executive Service in the 

17 Department; and 

18 ‘‘(B) such other official of the Department 

19 to serve as the acting head of a component in 

20 the event the head of a component vacates the 

21 position, in a manner that requires such official 

22 to have served for at least 90 days prior to such 

23 designation in the Senior Executive Service.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****    - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский 

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

        - Student Loans
        - Grants
        - Laws
        - Data

            - taxonomy view
            - Massachusetts 

# Massachusetts 

# Massachusetts 

                      -  July 15, 2021  U.S. Department of Education Approves Massachusetts' Plan for Use of American Rescue Plan Funds to Support K-12 Schools and Students, Distributes Remaining $611 Million  
On Wednesday, July 7, the U.S. Department of Education (Department) announced the approval of Massachusetts' American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ARP ESSER) plans and distributed remaining ARP ESSER funds to them.
  **Tags:**MassachusettsAmerican Rescue PlanPress Releases

## How Do I Find...?

                      - Student loans, forgiveness
                      - Higher Education Rulemaking
                      - College accreditation
                      - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
                      - FERPA
                      - FAFSA
                      - 1098, tax forms
                      - More...

## Information About...

                      - Elevating Teaching
                      - Early Learning
                      - Engage Every Student
                      - Unlocking Career Success
                      - Cybersecurity

----

*Our mission* is to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness by fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access.

          - Student Loans
          - Repaying Loans
          - Defaulted Loans
          - Loan Forgiveness
          - Loan Servicers
          - Grants & Programs
          - Apply for Pell Grants
          - Grants Forecast
          - Apply for a Grant

          - Laws & Guidance
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - Civil Rights
          - IDEA Website
          - Data & Research
          - Education Statistics
          - Postsecondary Education Data
          - ED Data Express
          - Nation's Report Card
          - What Works Clearinghouse
          - Open Data Platform
          - COVID Relief Data

          - About Us
          - Contact Us
          - ED Offices
          - Jobs
          - Press Releases
          - FAQs
          - Recursos en español
          - Budget, Performance
          - Privacy Program
          - Homeroom Blog

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information Quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 49 (Thursday, March 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 11813]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6377]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[Docket 57-96]


Foreign-Trade Zone 189--Muskegon, Michigan Application for 
Subzone Status ESCO Company Limited Partnership (Colorformer Chemicals) 
Muskegon, Mich.; Extension of Public Comment Period

    The comment period for the above case, requesting special-purpose 
subzone status for the colorformer chemicals manufacturing facility of 
ESCO Company Limited Partnership (ESCO) (jointly owned by Mitsui Toatsu 
Chemicals and Yamamoto Chemicals (Japan)), in Muskegon, Michigan (61 FR 
38137, 7/23/96) is further extended to April 14, 1997, to allow 
interested parties additional time in which to comment on the proposal.
    Comments in writing are invited during this period. Submissions 
should include 3 copies. Material submitted will be available at: 
Office of the Executive Secretary, Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S. 
Department of Commerce, Room 3716, 14th & Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, 
Washington, DC 20230.

    Dated: March 7, 1997.
John J. Da Ponte, Jr.,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-6377 Filed 3-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
EXHIBIT 10.43

                    Special Award Program
                           1-17-97
                              

- Due to actions resulting from the portfolio review
  process, special awards to certain executives or "key
  employees" may be recommended for exceptional performance in
  successfully completing the disposition of a business unit.
  
  
- Awards:     amount is discretionary based on situation

              can be based on the value of the proceeds
              achieved from the sale of the business unit

              no individual award to exceed $100,000

              aggregate cap on all awards is $2,000,000


- Payment:    generally paid in a lump sum
  
              timing could be immediate or upon closing of
              the sale


- Approval:   all recommendations must be approved by
              the Office of the Chief Executive
  
  
- Special awards would not be considered for purposes of
  any pension or benefit plan