alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.19 


Eastern Virginia Bankshares, Inc. (the “Company”)
 Schedule of Non-Employee Directors’ Annual Compensation 


Effective January 16, 2014 





		 	
	Meeting Fees(1)(2)
	 	 	  	 
	Per Company Board Meeting	 	$	300	 
	Per Company Committee Meeting	 	$	300	 
	Per EVB Board Meeting	 	$	500	 
	Per EVB Committee Meeting(3)	 	$	300	 







		 	
	Monthly Retainers
	 
	Chairman of the Company’s Audit and Risk Oversight Committee	 	$	300	 
	Other members of the Company’s Audit and Risk Oversight Committee	 	$	200	 
	Chairman of the EVB Board	 	$	500	 







		 	
	Annual stock grant to non-employee directors:	 	500 unrestricted shares of the Company’s common stock.








		(1)	Each director of the Company’s Board of Directors is also a member of the Board of Directors of EVB. 



		(2)	For meetings of the Company’s Board of Directors and EVB’s Board of Directors, directors are permitted one paid absence per year. 



		(3)	Each member of the Loan Committee of EVB receives $150 for each teleconference of the Loan Committee between regularly scheduled Loan Committee meetings.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 46 (Monday, March 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 10877]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5859]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service


Notice of Intent To Issue a Prospectus for the Operation of Pack 
Station Services and Facilities Within Sequoia National Park

SUMMARY: The National Park Service is seeking a concessioner to 
operate, under a 4-year permit, a pack station providing pack and 
saddle animal services and facilities within the Mineral King area of 
Sequoia National Park. These facilities would be operated for the 
public under the provisions of a Concession Permit. This notice is the 
formal announcement of the availability of this business opportunity 
and the initiation of the contracting process.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The pack station is located at an elevation 
of 7,800 feet in the Southern Sierra Nevada. It is a summer seasonal 
operation serving visitors to Sequoia National Park. The existing 
operator does not have a preference in the renewal of this concession 
permit. The award will be fully competitive based upon the requirements 
of this Prospectus.
    If you are interested in this business opportunity, please ask to 
be placed on the mailing list by writing or calling: National Park 
Service, Concession Management Office, Sequoia National Park, Three 
Rivers, CA 93271, or call: (209) 565-3103--Peggy Williams.
    When the Prospectus is issued, submittals will be accepted for a 
Sixty (60) day period under terms that will be described in the 
Prospectus. The release of the Prospectus is expected to occur shortly 
after the publication of this notice.

    Dated: February 11, 1997.
Michael J. Tollefson,
Superintendent, Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks.
[FR Doc. 97-5859 Filed 3-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-M
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
---------------------

Company Contact:
        Lance P. Wimmer
        Chairman, CEO
        IRATA, Inc.
        (713) 467-4300 ext.121


IRATA ANNOUNCES CONSOLIDATION PLANS WITH AUTO PHOTO SYSTEMS INC.
----------------------------------------------------------------

Houston, TX, August 4, 1997...Irata, Inc. (NASDAQ:IRATA) today announced the 
Company has signed an agreement to combine operations with Auto Photo Systems 
Inc. (APS), the U.S. subsidiary of Photo-Me International plc (PMI), a $350 
million revenue U.K. public company with world wide operations.

Irata and APS have agreed to immediately commence joint operations by 
consolidating their businesses in a newly formed limited liability company, 
Image Dynamics LLC.  Image Dynamics will be jointly owned by Irata and APS with 
the two companies sharing in net profits.  Based on respective valuations of the
contributions to the newly formed company, Irata will own about 26% of Image 
Dynamics LLC shares and net income.

Lance Wimmer, current Chairman and CEO of Irata and designated CEO of Image 
Dynamics said, "the joining together of Irata and APS, the two leading photo 
booth companies, is an outstanding opportunity.  Combined, Irata and APS 
revenues for the coming year are expected to be about $25 million with cash 
flow generation in excess of $4.0 million.  Image Dynamics will operate 700 
Irata booths and 1400 APS booths, taking advantage of the superior distribution 
and route management infrastructure of APS.  This is a classic case of major 
overhead cost reduction for two companies merging in the same industry and 
geography.  In addition, combined technological and financial resources will 
accelerate the market roll out of the new Irata color booth.  And, we will have 
combined management resources to continue to grow an even stronger and more 
profitable company in the future."

Irata, Inc. manufactures and operates consumer interactive self-service color 
and black & white photo booths under the trade name VideoFoto.  As of March 31, 
1997 the Company had about 700 booths in operation in shopping malls, theme 
parks, discount stores and a variety of other amusement locations nationally.

Certain statements contained in this press release which are not historical 
facts are forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties 
detailed in the Company's Securities and Exchange Commission filings.
# C_2022368EN.01001401.xml

| 26.9.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 368/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.9.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 368/14

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul București (Romania) lodged on 31 May 2022 — Neves 77 Solutions SRL v Agenția Națională de Administrare Fiscală — Direcția Generală Antifraudă Fiscală

(Case C-351/22)

(2022/C 368/20)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Tribunalul București

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Neves 77 Solutions SRL

Defendant: Agenția Națională de Administrare Fiscală — Direcția Generală Antifraudă Fiscală

Questions referred

| 1. | Can Decision 2014/512/CFSP, (1) in particular Articles 5 and 7 thereof, in the light of the principles of legal certainty and nulla poena sine lege, be interpreted as permitting (by way of a civil penalty) a national measure authorising the confiscation of the entire proceeds of a transaction, such as the one referred to in Article 2(2)(a) of Decision 2014/512/CFSP, in the event that an act categorised by domestic law as a summary offence is found to have been committed? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Can Decision 2014/512/CFSP, (1) in particular Articles 5 and 7 thereof, in the light of the principles of legal certainty and nulla poena sine lege, be interpreted as permitting (by way of a civil penalty) a national measure authorising the confiscation of the entire proceeds of a transaction, such as the one referred to in Article 2(2)(a) of Decision 2014/512/CFSP, in the event that an act categorised by domestic law as a summary offence is found to have been committed?

| 2. | Is Article 5 of Decision 2014/512/CFSP to be interpreted as allowing Member States to adopt national measures providing for the automatic confiscation of any proceeds resulting from a breach of the obligation to notify a transaction falling within the scope of Article 2(2)(a) of Decision 2014/512/CFSP? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Is Article 5 of Decision 2014/512/CFSP to be interpreted as allowing Member States to adopt national measures providing for the automatic confiscation of any proceeds resulting from a breach of the obligation to notify a transaction falling within the scope of Article 2(2)(a) of Decision 2014/512/CFSP?

| 3. | Is the prohibition laid down in Article 2(2)(a) of Decision 2014/512/CFSP applicable where goods constituting military equipment, which were the subject of brokering transactions, were never physically imported into the territory of the Member State? |
| --- | --- |

3.

Is the prohibition laid down in Article 2(2)(a) of Decision 2014/512/CFSP applicable where goods constituting military equipment, which were the subject of brokering transactions, were never physically imported into the territory of the Member State?

---

(1)  Council Decision 2014/512/CFSP of 31 July 2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia's actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2014 L 229, p. 13).

---
#### COM. v. BUNDY, K.

1575 WDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/27/2017

CP-17-CR-0000082-2013, CP-17-CR-0000085-2013, CP-17-CR-0000088-2013, *204CP-17-CR-0000089-2013, CP-17-CR-0000384-2012 (Clearfield)

Affirmed
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 11704]

                    Acting under the authority of and in accordance with section 1(a)(ii)(A) of                           ( print page 20030)    E.O. 13224 of September 23, 2001, as amended by E.O. 13268 of July 2, 2002, E.O. 13284 of January 23, 2003, and E.O. 13886 of September 9, 2019, (“E.O. 13224”), I hereby determine that the person known as Katibat al Tawhid wal Jihad (also known as KTJ, Khatiba al-Tawhid wal-Jihad, Jannat Oshiklari, and Tawhid and Jihad Brigade) is a foreign person that has committed and poses a significant risk of committing acts of terrorism that threaten the security of U.S. nationals or the national security, foreign policy, or economy of the United States.                

Consistent with the determination in section 10 of E.O. 13224 that prior notice to persons determined to be subject to the Order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States would render ineffectual the blocking and other measures authorized in the Order because of the ability to transfer funds instantaneously, I determine that no prior notice needs to be provided to any person subject to these determinations who might have a constitutional presence in the United States, because to do so would render ineffectual the measures authorized in the Order.

                    This determination shall be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Authority: E.O. 13224, Section 1(a)(ii).

Dated: February 22, 2022.

Antony J. Blinken,

Secretary of State.

[FR Doc. 2022-07304 Filed 4-5-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-AD-P
The Honorable James M. Rosenbaum, United States District Judge for th e 1 District of Minnesota. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 97-1877

_____________ Jeffrey A. Trueman, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. United States Department of Navy, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. *

_____________ Submitted: November 18, 1997 Filed: November 26, 1997

_____________ Before BOWMAN, LAY, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM. Jeffrey Trueman sued

the Navy for violating his rights under the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C . § 552a (1994 & Supp. II 1996), by denying him access to records concerning his Navy ca reer. The District Court granted the Navy's motion to dismiss the cas e 1 und er Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). Having reviewed th e record, we conclude that t

he dismissal of the suit was correct for two reasons: (1) the District Court lacked jurisdiction because Trueman failed to exhaust his administrative-2-

rem edies prior to filing suit; and (2) Trueman did not file his claim within the perio d prescribed by the Privacy Act's statute of limitations, 5 U.S.C. § 522a(g)(5). Because an extensive opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the judgment of the District Court in accordance with 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
04/1G/201 0 14:3 3 FA X 202493514 2 FA A + DM S 0001/00 1 

## Haynswort

h SinklerBoyd,p. v CHARLESTO N FLORENC E

ATTOnNFr s AN D COUNSELOR S A T LA W

Marc h 1,201 0 120 1 MAI N STREE T ?3N D FLOO R (29201-3235 ) POS T OFFIC E BO KiHO S (29211-1883 1 COLUMBIA . SOUT H CIHOLIN A TELEPHON E 803.77 9 306 0 FACSIMIL E flOa 78 5 124 3 WESiall b www.hsbie^i'^ir m co m JOH N ADAM S HODG E DIREC T DiA t

NUMUb

H lo^s^o7ar,f i EMAI L ihodae®M»MAwfir m co m Hearin g Docke t FAA , AGC-40 0 Roo m201 4 60 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , UC 2059 1 Atf . Hearin g Docke t

Cler k Re : Cas e Number

2009SO13001 7 Fina l Notic e o f

Propose dCivi l Penalty Hi-Fl i Aviatio n Too LLC IIS B Fil e No . 34162. 1 .5 ^ C D 

# 0.f// ) S D dD03 /jo/0-oi^i . Dea r Sir/Madam : O n behal f

o f th e respondent , Hi-Fl i Aviation , in th e aforementione dmatter , w e hereb y reques t ahearin g t o contes t

th e Fina

l Notic e o f

Propose dCivi l Penalt

y asscs.sc dagains t

th e respondent . We are requestin g that the hearin g b e hel di

n Columbia , Sout

h Carolina . Th e ground s fo

r thi s appeal ar

e tha t th e Notic e o f

Propose dCivi l Penalt

y i s factually incorrect , an dHi-Fl i denie s tha t i t wa s engage din flight s fo r compensatio n o r

hir e andgenerall y denie s th e remainin g allegation s o f th e Order . Upo n servic e o f acomplaint , w e inten dto file a detaile danswer . W

e reques t tha t ahearin g b e hel di n Columbia , Sout h Carolina . Than k yo u ver y much . (eiy/jtrul y yours .

JAH/es f cc : Rober

t B . Dixon , Hsquir

e

Columbia . 131976 8 v. l
# C_2022318EN.01001902.xml

| 22.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 318/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 318/19

---

Appeal brought on 10 March 2022 by Laboratorios Ern, SA against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 12 January 2022 in Case T-160/21, Laboratorios Ern v EUIPO — Malpricht (APIRETAL)

(Case C-187/22 P)

(2022/C 318/27)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Laboratorios Ern, SA (represented by: T. González Martínez and R. Guerras Mazón, abogados)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), Ingrid Malpricht

By order of 11 July 2022, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) held that the appeal was not allowed to proceed and that Laboratorios Ern, SA should bear its own costs.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 32h

        Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18
                            of the United States Code

      I, Thomas M. O'Flynn, Chief Financial Officer of PSEG Energy Holdings
L.L.C., to the best of my knowledge, certify that (i) the Annual Report of PSEG
Energy Holdings L.L.C. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of PSEG Energy Holdings L.L.C.

                                   /s/ Thomas M. O'Flynn
                                   -----------------------------------------
                                   Thomas M. O'Flynn
                                   PSEG Energy Holdings L.L.C.
                                   Chief Financial Officer
                                   February 27, 2006
# Survey
Z-ZC-IK

AW LcosU

i?O^Ac^L_ -

SSLfflS30> a&

mwimmMfr

MAR 30 2015

3&XSkk*Ltl<4^

W<Lvj <L»<k>-^ ^ -7%57&

CoA^^a^O-H5^J7^cC.

^tcx-kAfaLJC_2iail^:&$L^Jp11^D3-

(LJL
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - 21 CFR Part 170

### CFR Correction

This rule is being published by the Office of the Federal Register to correct an editorial or technical error that appeared in the most recent annual revision of the Code of Federal Regulations.

In Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 170 to 199, revised as of April 1, 2021, in § 170.30, reinstate paragraph (g) to read as follows:

§ 170.30 

* * * * *

(g) A food ingredient that is not GRAS or subject to a prior sanction requires a food additive regulation promulgated under section 409 of the act before it may be directly or indirectly added to food.

* * * * *

[FR Doc. 2022-06677 Filed 3-28-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 0099-10-D
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                5
<LEGEND>
The Schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from the financial statements for Liberty Tax Credit Plus L.P. and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                           0000818020
<NAME>  Liberty Tax Credit Plus L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                    1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               MAR-15-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  MAR-16-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-15-1999
<CASH>                          14,102,799
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   759,554
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                1,435,749
<PP&E>                          258,117,352
<DEPRECIATION>                  96,910,767
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  180,674,484
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           30,814,140
<BONDS>                         157,076,867
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        0
<OTHER-SE>                      (7,216,523)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    180,674,484
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                26,737,775
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                23,381,954
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              9,566,139
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0
<INCOME-TAX>                    (6,210,318)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (5,882,949)
<EPS-BASIC>                   (364.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   0



</TABLE>
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-21-00319-CV

CARRIE M. LEO

v.

TYLER C. THOMAS AND NICHOLAS STACEY D/B/A FRAGILE PLANET WILDLIFE 

CENTER, FORMERLY KNOWN AS FRAGILE PLANET WILDLIFE FOUNDATION

On Appeal from the

444th District Court of Cameron County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2020-DCL-01028

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. No costs are assessed, as appellant filed an 

affidavit of inability to pay costs.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

November 10, 2021
# Regulation

- Raise the Bar Policy Brief: 
- Biden-Harris Administration Continues Efforts to Provide Debt Relief for More Student Loan Borrowers The  Biden-Harris Administration today continued its critical efforts to deliver  student debt relief to as many borrowers as possible through negotiated  rulemaking under the Higher Education Act by releasing draft regulatory text  for specific categories of borrowers and outlining next steps to consider  relief options for borrowers experiencing hardship.
- The Department of Education Announces Public Hearings on Higher Education Rulemaking The U.S. Department of Education  (Department) announced today that it will hold virtual  public hearings on April 11, 12, and 13 to receive stakeholder feedback on  potential issues for future rulemaking sessions.
- U.S. Department of Education Launches Review of Prohibition on Incentive Compensation for College Recruiters The U.S. Department of Education announced today that it will hold virtual listening sessions on the impact of Department guidance on how institutions of higher education may compensate their recruiters. The Department is looking to hear from the public about how an exception contained in the guidance has affected the growth of online enrollment and associated federal student loan debt.
- New Proposed Regulations Would Transform Income-Driven Repayment by Cutting Undergraduate Loan Payments in Half and Preventing Unpaid Interest Accumulation Today, the U.S. Department of Education (Department) proposed regulations to reduce the cost of federal student loan payments, especially for low and middle-income borrowers.
- Education Department Unveils Final Rules to Protect Veterans and Service Members, Improve College Access for Incarcerated Individuals and Improve Oversight When Colleges Change Owners Today, the U.S. Department of Education (Department) announced final rules that will better protect veterans and service members from predatory recruitment practices, implement access to Pell Grants for incarcerated students in high-quality prison education programs, and increase accountability when colleges and universities change ownership.
- Education Department Releases Proposed Regulations to Expand and Improve Targeted Relief Programs Today, the U.S. Department of Education  (Department) released proposed regulations that would expand and improve the  major student loan discharge programs authorized by the Higher Education Act.
- New Negotiated Rulemaking Committee to Focus on Student Loans, Targeted Discharge and Forgiveness Authorities Today the U.S.
- Department of Education’s Office of Postsecondary Education Announces Public Hearings on Protections for Students, Loan Repayment, Targeted Loan Cancellation Programs, and Other Higher Education Regulations The U.S.  Department of Education’s Office of Postsecondary Education announced today  that it will hold virtual public hearings on June 21, 23, and 24 to receive  stakeholder feedback on potential issues for future rulemaking sessions.