alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.2

                            SOCO INTERNATIONAL PLC
                   (Registered in England under No. 3300821)

Territorial Resources

8 May 1997

Dear Sirs:

We refer to the Shareholders' Exchange Agreement between Territorial Resources
and SOCO International plc (the "Company") dated 6 May 1997 (the "Agreement"), a
copy of which is attached hereto.  The Agreement envisages that you will dispose
of part of your interest in SOCO Tamtsag Mongolia, Inc. in return for the issue
of shares of the Company representing 3.492% of the Company's share capital (pre
new money) as calculated in accordance with the provisions of the Agreement (the
"Consideration Shares").

We have subsequently agreed that instead of you receiving only the Consideration
Shares, you will instead receive a mix of cash and shares in the Company.  The
cash element of the consideration shall be such sum as is equal to 20% of the
Consideration Shares at the Placing Price (as defined in the Placing Agreement
to be entered into between, inter alia, the Company and Swiss Bank Corporation
on or about 14 May 1997) whilst the balance shall be such number of shares as,
when aggregated with the cash element, equates in value to 3.492% of the Company
(pre new money).  Save as amended by this letter, the Agreement continues in
full force and effect.

Please sign and return the enclosed copy of this letter to confirm you agreement
to its terms.  Could you please also return details of your bank account into
which the cash consideration should be paid together with your share
certificate(s) in SOCO Tamtsag Mongolia, Inc. to our solicitors, Ashurst Morris
Crisp (for the attention of Steven Fox).  The share certificates will be held in
escrow, to your order, pending completion of the Agreement, which is expected to
become effective on 29 May 1997.


Yours faithfully

/s/

For and on behalf of
SOCO International PLC


We hereby accept the terms of the Agreement as revised by the terms of this
letter.

/a/
__________________________________________ 
For and on behalf of Territorial Resources
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

L.T. Etchison, Jr., Appellant

No. 06

- 15

- 00134

- CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 18th District Court of Johnson County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No.

F48379 ). Memorandum Opinion delivered by J ustice Burgess, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the appeal should be dismissed

for want of jurisdiction . Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We note that the appellant, L.T. Etchison, Jr., has adequately indicated his inability to pay

costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED SEPTEMBER 15, 2015

BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
#### Frederick L. PITCHFORD Plaintiff-Appellant v. Joseph BOECKMANN; Fred Thorne; David Henry Lofton; Jerry Eaves Defendants-Appellees

No. 17-2504

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: February 14, 2018

Filed: February 28, 2018

Frederick L. Pitchford, Pro Se

Before COLLOTON, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Frederick L. Pitchford appeals the district court’s1 dismissal, without prejudice, of his pro se complaint. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms.

Upon de novo review of Pitchford’s appellate arguments and the district court record, this court finds no basis for reversal. *See Moore v. Sims,*200 F.3d 1170 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam) (pre-service dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) is reviewed de novo).

The judgment of the district court is affirmed. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable D. P. Marshall, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
(logo) BERKADIA

 

 

Annual Statement as toCompliance

For the Calendar Year 2016

 

Morgan Stanley Bank of AmericaMerrill Lynch Trust, 

Series 2015-C21

 

Pursuant to Section 3.01(13.9) of the Subservicing Agreement governing the referenced transaction (the“Servicing Agreement”), I hereby attest that:

 

i.   A review of theactivities and performance of Berkadia as Sub-Servicer during the calendar yearhas been made under my supervision.

 

ii. To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, Berkadia as Subservicer has fulfilled, in allmaterial respects, its obligations under the Subservicing Agreement throughoutthe calendar year and no default by the Subservicer under the SubservicerAgreement has occurred and is continuing.

 

 

Berkadia,

 

/s/ Mark E. McCool 

 

Mark E. McCool 

President 

February 10, 2017
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8748 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 by updating the definition 

of untaxed income and benefits. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 12, 2020 

Ms. SPANBERGER (for herself and Mr. FITZPATRICK) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 by updating 

the definition of untaxed income and benefits. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Honor Our Nation’s 

5 Oath to Remember Our Veterans’ Sacrifice Act’’ or the 

6 ‘‘HONOR Our Veterans’ Sacrifice Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF UNTAXED INCOME AND BENEFITS. 

8 Section 480(b) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 

9 (20 U.S.C. 1087vv(b)) is amended— 

10 (1) in paragraph (1)— 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8748 IH

1 (A) by striking subparagraph (C); and 

2 (B) by redesignating subparagraphs (D) 

3 through (I) as subparagraphs (C) through (J), 

4 respectively; and 

5 (2) in paragraph (2)— 

6 (A) in subparagraph (E), by striking ‘‘or’’; 

7 (B) in subparagraph (F), by striking the 

8 period and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

9 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

10 ‘‘(G) veterans’ benefits such as disability, 

11 death pension, dependency, or indemnity com12 pensation, or veterans’ education benefits (as 

13 defined in subsection (c)).’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 42 (Tuesday, March 4, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 9812]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5246]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--National Center for Manufacturing Sciences, 
Inc. (NCMS)

    Notice is hereby given that, on February 4, 1997, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), the National Center for 
Manufacturing Sciences, Inc. (``NCMS'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing changes in its membership and providing 
information on the status of its research projects. The notifications 
were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting 
the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances. Specifically, the following companies were accepted as 
active members of NCMS: Advanced Technology & Research Corporation, 
Burtonsville, MD; Lockheed Martin Corporation, Idaho Falls, ID; OMNEX 
Engineering & Management, Inc., Ann Arbor, MI; and Structural Dynamics 
Research Corporation, Milford, OH. Software Productivity Consortium 
NFP, Inc., Herndon, VA, was approved for affiliate membership. Cimflex 
Teknowledge Corporation, Palo Alto, CA, changed its name to Teknowledge 
Corporation, and ICAD, Inc., Burlington, MA, has changed its name to 
Concentra Corporation. The McNeal-Schwendler Corporation, Los Angeles, 
CA, acquired Aries Technology, Inc. and subsequently became a member of 
NCMS. The following companies have canceled their active membership in 
NCMS: Andersen Consulting LLP, Detroit, MI; Computer Tool & Die 
Systems, Inc., Ann Arbor, MI; Knowledge Based Systems, Inc., College 
Station, TX; Physical Sciences Inc., Andover, MA; C. Thorrez 
Industries, Inc., Jackson, MI; and Weed Instrument Company, Inc., Simi 
Valley, CA. The following organizations have resigned from affiliate 
membership in NCMS: American Supplier Institute, Allen Park, MI; Les 
Chefs Mailleurs de la Qualite, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and NCMS intends to file additional 
written notification disclosing all changes in membership.
    On February 20, 1987, NCMS filed its original notification pursuant 
to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a 
notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on 
March 17, 1987 (52 FR 8375).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on November 24, 
1996. This notice was published in the Federal Register on December 19, 
1996 (61 FR 67067).
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 97-5246 Filed 3-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 14

- 14454 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:12

- cr - 00006

- WS

- GRJ

- 1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,
versus JAMES RAY WILLIAMS, a.k.a. Jason Felix, Defendant

- Appellant.

___ _____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida

________________________ (June 26, 2015) Before: HULL, WILLIAM PRYOR , and JULIE CARNES , Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Case: 14-14454 Date Filed: 06/26/2015 Page: 1 of 22 Barbara Sanders, appointed counsel for James Ray Williams in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Williams and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record rev eals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED , and Williams’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED
.

Case: 14-14454 Date Filed: 06/26/2015 Page: 2 of 2
# C_2021471EN.01006402.xml

| 22.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 471/64 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 471/64

---

Action brought on 4 October 2021 — bet-at-home.com Entertainment v EUIPO (bet-at-home)

(Case T-640/21)

(2021/C 471/90)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: bet-at-home.com Entertainment GmbH (Linz, Austria) (Prozessbevollmächtigter: represented by: R. Paulitsch, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: Application for the EU figurative mark bet-at-home in the colours dark blue and green — Application No 18 157 957

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 5 August 2021 in Case R 2143/2020-1

Forms of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | amend the contested decision so that the figurative mark bet-at-home is accepted for registration also in Class 41 (Entertainment); |
| --- | --- |

—

amend the contested decision so that the figurative mark bet-at-home is accepted for registration also in Class 41 (Entertainment);

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings, including the costs incurred in the appeal proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings, including the costs incurred in the appeal proceedings.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8794 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8794

To require the Secretary of the Treasury to establish an advisory team 
 to examine strategies to increase cooperation between the public and 
 private sectors for purposes of countering illicit finance, including 
  proliferation finance and sanctions evasion, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 20, 2020

 Mrs. Axne (for herself and Mr. Steil) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Secretary of the Treasury to establish an advisory team 
 to examine strategies to increase cooperation between the public and 
 private sectors for purposes of countering illicit finance, including 
  proliferation finance and sanctions evasion, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Preventing Illicit Finance Act''.

SEC. 2. ENCOURAGING INFORMATION SHARING AND PUBLIC-PRIVATE 
              PARTNERSHIPS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of the Treasury shall convene an 
advisory team of relevant Federal agencies, private sector experts in 
banking, national security, and law enforcement, and other stakeholders 
to--
            (1) examine strategies to increase cooperation between the 
        public and private sectors for purposes of countering illicit 
        finance, including proliferation finance and sanctions evasion; 
        and
            (2) advise on strategies to combat the risk relating to 
        proliferation financing.
    (b) Meetings.--The advisory team shall meet periodically, including 
at the request of the Secretary of the Treasury.
    (c) Federal Advisory Committee Act.--The Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (5 U.S.C. App.) shall not apply to the advisory team or to the 
activities of the advisory team.
                                 <all>
```
No. 11-10405.

#### Singleton *v.*Indiana.

Ct. App. Ind. Certio-rari denied.
# C_2021471EN.01005802.xml

| 22.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 471/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 471/58

---

Action brought on 30 September 2021 — Segimerus v EUIPO — Karsten Manufacturing (MONSOON)

(Case T-627/21)

(2021/C 471/83)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Segimerus Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: G. Donath, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Karsten Manufacturing Corp. (Phoenix, Arizona, United States)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark MONSOON — EU trade mark No 10 469 906

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 July 2021 in Case R 1125/2020-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 59(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 59(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 34 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 34 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 94 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 94 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 42 (Tuesday, March 4, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 9718-9719]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5302]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
50 CFR Part 679

[Docket No. 961107312-7012-02; I.D. 022697C]


Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska; Atka 
Mackerel in the Eastern Aleutian District and Bering Sea Subarea

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and

[[Page 9719]]

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Prohibition of retention.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NMFS is prohibiting retention of Atka mackerel in the Eastern 
Aleutian District and the Bering Sea subarea of the Bering Sea and 
Aleutian Islands management area (BSAI). NMFS is requiring that catches 
of Atka mackerel in this area be treated in the same manner as 
prohibited species and discarded at sea with a minimum of injury. This 
action is necessary because the Atka mackerel 1997 total allowable 
catch (TAC) in this area has been reached.

EFFECTIVE DATE: 1200 hrs, Alaska local time (A.l.t.), February 28, 
1997, until 2400 hrs, A.l.t., December 31, 1997.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Furuness, 907-586-7228.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The groundfish fishery in the BSAI exclusive 
economic zone is managed by NMFS according to the Fishery Management 
Plan for the Groundfish Fishery of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands 
Area (FMP) prepared by the North Pacific Fishery Management Council 
under authority of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and 
Management Act. Fishing by U.S. vessels is governed by regulations 
implementing the FMP at subpart H of 50 CFR part 600 and CFR part 679.
    The 1997 TAC of Atka mackerel in the Eastern Aleutian District and 
the Bering Sea subarea was established by the Final 1997 Harvest 
Specifications of Groundfish for the BSAI (62 FR 7168, February 18, 
1997) as 15,000 metric tons. See Sec. 679.20(c)(3)(iii).
    In accordance with Sec. 679.20(d)(2), the Administrator, Alaska 
Region, NMFS (Regional Administrator), has determined that the 1997 TAC 
for Atka mackerel in the Eastern Aleutian District and the Bering Sea 
subarea has been reached. Therefore, the Regional Administrator is 
requiring that further catches of Atka mackerel in the Eastern Aleutian 
District and the Bering Sea subarea be treated as prohibited species in 
accordance with Sec. 679.21(b).
    Maximum retainable bycatch amounts for applicable gear types may be 
found in the regulations at Sec. 679.20(e).

Classification

    This action is required by Sec. 679.20 and is exempt from review 
under E.O. 12866.

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: February 27, 1997.
Gary Matlock,
Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries 
Service.
[FR Doc. 97-5302 Filed 2-27-97; 5:02 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
# C_2023278EN.01001102.xml

| 7.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 278/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 278/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 22 June 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nederlandstalige rechtbank van eerste aanleg Brussel — Belgium) — Vitol SA v Belgische Staat

(Case C-268/22, (1) VITOL)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Commercial policy - Protection against dumping - Imports of biodiesel originating in Argentina and Indonesia - Validity of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1194/2013 - Admissibility - No action for annulment brought by the applicant in the main proceedings - Importer - Determination of dumping - Factors to be taken into consideration)

(2023/C 278/16)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Nederlandstalige rechtbank van eerste aanleg Brussel

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Vitol SA

Defendant: Belgische Staat

Operative part of the judgment

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1194/2013 of 19 November 2013 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of biodiesel originating in Argentina and Indonesia, as amended by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1578 of 18 September 2017, is invalid inasmuch as it infringes the requirements under Article 2(5) and Article 3(4), (6) and (7) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European [Union].

---

(1)  OJ C 318, 22.8.2022.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 23.4

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
3TEC Energy Corporation:

    We consent to the use of our report dated March 26, 2002, with respect to
the consolidated balance sheets of 3TEC Energy Corporation and subsidiaries as
of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the
years then ended, which are included in the December 31, 2001 Form 10-KSB of
3TEC Energy Corporation. Our report refers to a change to the method of
accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities.

KPMG LLP

Houston, Texas
February 12, 2003
No. 11-10239.

#### Lyons v. Coleman, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Fayette, et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
| (logo) Prudential

  | Prudential Asset Resources,  Inc.

 

**Prudential Mortgage Capital  Company**

2100 Ross Avenue, Suite 2500  Dallas, TX 75201

Tel 877-937-4500

  |
|---------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation Commercial Mortgage ServicingMAC D1086550 South Tryon Street, 14th FloorCharlotte, North Carolina 28202Attention: Asset Manager

RE:**WFCM 2015-C26**Period:**January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016 (the "ReportingPeriod")**

**Annual Compliance Statement**I, Timothy E. Steward, in my capacity as President and Managing Director of PrudentialAsset Resources, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certify with regard tothe Company's role as Primary Servicer under the Pooling and ServicingAgreement, (the "Agreement") dated as of February 1, 2015 pertainingto the above-referenced certificates, that:(i) a review of the activities of the Company under the Agreement during theperiod noted above, and of the performance of the Company under the Agreementduring the reporting period has been made under my supervision, and(ii) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Company hasfulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout the reportingperiod.

 

 

Effective as of 2/22/2017

/s/ Timothy E. StewardTimothy E. StewardPresident and Managing DirectorPrudential Asset Resources, Inc.
No. 11-10273.

#### Bongiovanni, on Behalf of Bongiovanni *v.*Grubin, Trustee.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.