alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                              The Schedule contains summary
                              financial information extracted
                              from the financial statements for
                              Liberty Tax Credit Plus L.P. and
                              is qualified in its entirety by
                              reference to such financial
                              statements
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000818020
<NAME>                        Liberty Tax Credit Plus L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-15-1998    
<PERIOD-START>                                 MAR-16-1997    
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-15-1997
<CASH>                                         12,902,098        
<SECURITIES>                                   0                 
<RECEIVABLES>                                  563,224           
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0                 
<INVENTORY>                                    0                 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,318,897         
<PP&E>                                         256,264,826       
<DEPRECIATION>                                 76,335,906        
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 197,401,196       
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          26,386,826        
<BONDS>                                        157,599,911       
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0                 
<PREFERRED>                                    0                 
<COMMON>                                       0                 
<OTHER-SE>                                     13,414,460        
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   197,401,196                  
<SALES>                                        0                 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               17,373,523        
<CGS>                                          0                 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0                 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               15,144,704        
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0                 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             6,375,770         
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,146,951)       
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0                 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0                 
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0                 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                693,340           
<CHANGES>                                      0                 
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,146,951)       
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (202.46)          
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0       
                                               


</TABLE>
[NSA Letterhead]



Exhibit 23.2



CONSENT OF NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.



We hereby consent to the references in this Form 10-K of Plains Exploration & Production Company, as well as in the Notes to the Consolidated
Financial Statements included in such Form 10-K, to our reserve reports to the interest of Plains Exploration & Production Company and its subsidiaries (collectively the Company), relating to the estimated quantities of certain of
the Companys proved reserves of oil and gas and present values thereof for certain periods.



NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.



By:  /s/  J. CARTER HENSON, JR.

| | 
| | 

J. Carter Henson, Jr.

Senior Vice President



Houston, Texas

March 26, 2003



1
# C_2021431EN.01004801.xml

| 25.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 431/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.10.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 431/48

---

Action brought on 31 August 2021 — Tinnus Enterprises v EUIPO — Mystic Products (Fluid distribution equipment)

(Case T-535/21)

(2021/C 431/56)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Tinnus Enterprises LLC (Plano, Texas, United States) (represented by: T. Wuttke, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Mystic Products Import & Export, SL (Badalona, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the design at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Design at issue: Community design No 1 431 829-0009

Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 June 2021 in Case R 1004/2018-3

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | alter the contested decision to:






  — | allow the applicant’s appeal, |
| --- | --- | --- |

—

alter the contested decision to:

—

allow the applicant’s appeal,

| — | dismiss in its entirety the invalidity applicant’s application ICD 10 297 to declare the contested design invalid, |
| --- | --- |

—

dismiss in its entirety the invalidity applicant’s application ICD 10 297 to declare the contested design invalid,

| — | order the invalidity applicant to pay the applicant’s costs in front of the Board of Appeal and the Invalidity Division; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the invalidity applicant to pay the applicant’s costs in front of the Board of Appeal and the Invalidity Division;

| — | order the invalidity applicant to pay the applicant’s fees and costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the invalidity applicant to pay the applicant’s fees and costs.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of the principles set forth in the judgment of 24 March 2021, Lego v EUIPO — Delta Sport Handelskontor (Building block from a toy building set) (T-515/19, not published, EU:T:2021:155); |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of the principles set forth in the judgment of 24 March 2021, Lego v EUIPO — Delta Sport Handelskontor (Building block from a toy building set) (T-515/19, not published, EU:T:2021:155);

| — | Infringement of the principles set forth in the judgment of 8 March 2018, DOCERAM (C-395/16, EU:C:2018:172); |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of the principles set forth in the judgment of 8 March 2018, DOCERAM (C-395/16, EU:C:2018:172);

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002;

| — | Misinterpretation of patent application EP 3 005 948 A2 and the applicant’s multiple design application No. 1 431 829-0001-0010. |
| --- | --- |

—

Misinterpretation of patent application EP 3 005 948 A2 and the applicant’s multiple design application No. 1 431 829-0001-0010.

---
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****    - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский 

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

        - Student Loans
        - Grants
        - Laws
        - Data

# Aviso a personas con dominio limitado del idioma inglés

# Aviso a personas con dominio limitado del idioma inglés

                                    -        EnlacesRecursos en españolPreguntas y Respuestas FrecuentesOficina para Derechos CivilesOficina de Ayuda Federal para Estudiantes
Si usted tiene alguna dificultad en entender el idioma inglés, puede solicitar asistencia lingüística con respecto a la información del Departamento que está disponible al público. Estos servicios de asistencia con el idioma están disponibles sin costo alguno. Si necesita más información sobre los servicios de traducción e interpretación, llame al 1-800-USA-LEARN (1-800-872-5327), TTY: (800) 877-8339 TTY / ASCII (American Standard Code For Information Interchange), o envíe un mensaje de correo electrónico a: Ed.Language.Assistance@ed.gov.

O bien, escriba a:

U.S. Department of EducationInformation Resource CenterLBJ Education Building400 Maryland Ave., S.W.Washington, DC 20202
             How Do I Find...?    - Student loans, forgiveness
- Higher Education Rulemaking
- College accreditation
- Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
- FERPA
- FAFSA
- 1098, tax forms
- More...
      Information About...    - Elevating Teaching
- Early Learning
- Engage Every Student
- Unlocking Career Success
- Cybersecurity
             
*Our mission* is to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness by fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access.
- Student Loans
- Repaying Loans
- Defaulted Loans
- Loan Forgiveness
- Loan Servicers
- Grants & Programs
- Apply for Pell Grants
- Grants Forecast
- Apply for a Grant
- Laws & Guidance
- Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
- FERPA
- Civil Rights
- IDEA Website
- Data & Research
- Education Statistics
- Postsecondary Education Data
- ED Data Express
- Nation's Report Card
- What Works Clearinghouse
- Open Data Platform
- COVID Relief Data
- About Us
- Contact Us
- ED Offices
- Jobs
- Press Releases
- FAQs
- Recursos en español
- Budget, Performance
- Privacy Program
- Homeroom Blog
- Notices
- FOIA
- Privacy Policy
- Accessibility
- Security
- Information Quality
- Inspector General
- Whitehouse.gov
- USA.gov
- Benefits.gov
- Regulations.gov
No. 11-1296.

#### Katz-Pueschel *v.*Department of Transportation.

C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7650
FRED POWELL, Petitioner - Appellant, versus PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, Magistrate Judge. (CA-05-445) Submitted: May 16, 2006 Decided: May 19, 2006 Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Fred Powell, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Fred Powell, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Powell v. Stansberry , No. CA-05-445 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 14, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
August 22, 2012

No. 11-10563.

#### Hix *v.*United States.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari dismissed under this Court’s Rule 46.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 66 (Wednesday, April 6, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19958-19959]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-07217]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial

[[Page 19959]]

property such as patentable material, and personal information 
concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the 
disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of 
personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel; Small Business: Molecular and Cell Biology.
    Date: April 19, 2022.
    Time: 3:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Rockledge II, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Ronit I. Yarden, Ph.D., MHSA, Scientific Review 
Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 904B, Bethesda, MD 20892, (202) 
552-9939, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#433a223127262d312a032030316d2d2a2b6d242c35"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1861796a7c7d766a71587b6b6a36767170367f776e">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS).

    Dated: April 1, 2022.
Victoria E. Townsend,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-07217 Filed 4-5-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 Certification Pursuant To Section 1350 Of Chapter 63 Of 18 U.S.C.
As Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002/SEC Rule 13a-14(b)
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated: August 18, 2006
    
    /s/ Joseph F. ONeillJoseph F. ONeillChief Executive Officer
Exhibit 4.9

 

EXISTING RCF ACCESSION LETTER

 

To: ING Bank N.V., London Branch as Facility Agent

 

From:  Coca-Cola HBC Holdings B.V. and Coca-Cola HBC AG.

 

Dated:                                   22 July 2013

 

Dear Sirs

 

COCA-COLA HBC AG - €500,000,000 SYNDICATED MULTI-CURRENCY
 REVOLVING CREDIT FACILITY AGREEMENT 
 DATED 12 MAY 2011 (AS AMENDED, RESTATED AND SUPPLEMENTED FROM
 TIME TO TIME) (THE “FACILITY AGREEMENT”)

 

1.                                We refer to the Facility Agreement.  This is an Accession Letter.  Terms defined in the Facility Agreement have the same meaning in this Accession Letter unless given a different meaning in this Accession Letter.

 

2.                                Coca-Cola HBC Holdings B.V. agrees to become an Additional Guarantor and to be bound by the terms of the Facility Agreement as an Additional Guarantor pursuant to Clause 24.4 (Additional Guarantors) of the Facility Agreement.  Coca-Cola HBC Holdings B.V is a private company with limited liability duly incorporated under the laws of the Netherlands.

 

3.                                Coca-Cola HBC Holdings B.V.’s administrative details are as follows:

 

Address:                                           Naritaweg 165, 1043 BW Amsterdam, the Netherlands

 

Fax No:                                              +302106183275

 

Attention:                                   Bart Jansen

 

4.                                This Accession Letter and any non-contractual obligations arising out of or in connection with it are governed by English law.

 

5.                                The courts of England have exclusive jurisdiction to settle any dispute arising out of or in connection with this deed (including a dispute regarding the existence, validity or termination of this Accession Letter) (a “Dispute”). The parties to this Accession Letter agree that the courts of England are the most appropriate and convenient courts to settle Disputes and accordingly no Party will argue to the contrary. This paragraph 5 is for the benefit of the Finance Parties only.  As a result, no Finance Party shall be prevented from taking proceedings relating to a Dispute in any other courts with jurisdiction.  To the extent allowed by law, the Finance Parties may take concurrent proceedings in any number of jurisdictions.

 











 

6.                                This Accession Letter is entered into by deed.

 

 

	
EXECUTED AND DELIVERED AS A   DEED BY COCA-COLA HBC AG
    	
 
    	
EXECUTED AND DELIVERED AS A   DEED BY COCA-COLA HBC HOLDINGS B.V.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
By: 
    	
/s/ J. Gustavsson
    	
 
    	
By: 
    	
/s/ H. Balcarova
    
	
Name: 
    	
J. Gustavsson
    	
 
    	
Name: 
    	
H. Balcarova
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
Director A
    
	
Date: 22 July 2013
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Date: 22 July 2013
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
By: 
    	
/s/ M. Imellos
    	
 
    	
By: 
    	
/s/ B.H.O. Jansen
    
	
Name: 
    	
M. Imellos
    	
 
    	
Name: 
    	
B.H.O. Jansen
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
Director B
    
	
Date: 22 July 2013
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Date: 22 July 2013
Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION III

1650 Arch Street

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029

March 9, 2010

Honorable Collin P. O’Mara, Secretary

Delaware Department of Natural Resources 

 and Environmental Control

89 Kings Highway

Dover, Delaware 19901

Dear Secretary O’Mara:

On June 22, 2009, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a revision

to the Delaware State Implementation Plan (SIP) from the Department of Natural Resources and 

Environmental Control. The SIP revision pertains to a plan entitled “Regulation No.1141 –

Limiting Emissions of Volatile Organic Compounds from Consumer and Commercial Products.” 

EPA has determined that the submittal is administratively and technically complete, and is 

reviewing it to prepare a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. 

If members of your staff have any questions, they may direct them to Mr. Gregory 

Becoat, at (215) 814-2036. He is the principal contact for this rulemaking. 

Sincerely, 

 

 /s/

 David Arnold, Acting Director

 Air Protection Division 

cc: Ali Mirzakhalili, Administrator

Air Quality Management Section
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 18

- 00353

- CV

I N THE I NTEREST OF S.S., A C HILD §

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 322nd District Court

of Tarrant County (322

- 568527

- 15)

April 18, 2019

Per Curiam

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 45 (Friday, March 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 10622]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5606]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

February 28, 1997.
    The Department of Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.
    Special Request: In order to begin the study described below in 
early April 1997, the Department of the Treasury is requesting that the 
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) review and approve this 
information collection by March 12, 1997. To obtain a copy of this 
study, please contact the IRS Clearance Officer at the address listed 
below.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

    OMB Number: 1545-1349.
    Project Number: SOI-26.
    Type of Review: Revision.
    Title: Internal Revenue Service (IRS) 4868 (Extension to File) 
TeleFile Script Study.
    Description: The purpose of the development and support of the 4868 
script is to facilitate the use of a Touchtone Data Entry (TDE) system 
which allows tax preparers to extend the first filing fate of their 
clients' tax returns in a ``paperless'' environment. Additionally, this 
study is expected to examine cognitive issues involved in TDE 
procedures, using specific research methodologies, in order to assess 
error associated with the extension to file process in a timely and 
accurate manner.
    Respondents: Business or other for-profit.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 13.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent:
      Pretest--4.5 minutes.
      Cognitive test--15 minutes.
    Frequency of Response: Other.
    Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 20 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Garrick Shear (202) 622-3869, Internal Revenue 
Service, Room 5571, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20224.
    OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt (202) 395-7860, Office of 
Management and Budget, Room 10226, New Executive Office Building, 
Washington, DC 20503.
Lois K. Holland,
Departmental Reports Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-5606 Filed 3-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
No. 11-6870.

#### Haley *v.*Georgia.

Sup. Ct. Ga. Certiorari denied.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 6896

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. MICHAEL OWEN HARRIOT, a/k/a Lanky, a/k/a Donovan Smith, a/k/a Richard Onyett, a/k/a Bernard Barber, a/k/a James D. Smith, a/k/a Michael Smith , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Columbia

. Margaret B. Seymour, Senior District Judge. ( 3:99

- cr - 00341

- MBS

- 3 )

Submitted : November 12, 2019 Decided: November 19, 2019

Before DIAZ and THACKER , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Michael Owen Harriot , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Michael Owen Harriot seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60 motion and denying reconsideration. We dismiss the appeal. Because Harriot sought reconsideration of the dist rict court’s previous order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion, the district court’s orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A COA will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a cons titutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find debatable or wrong the court’s assessment of the constitutional claims. Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484

- 85 (2000). Where the district court denies the motion on procedural grounds, the movant must demonstrate both t hat the court’s dispositive procedural ruling is debatable or wrong and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Harriot has n ot made the requisite showing. Because the claims Harriot raised challenged the validity of his convictions, the motions should have been construed as successive § 2255 motions. See United States v. McRae , 793 F.3d 392, 397

- 40 (4th Cir. 2015). In the ab sence of prefiling authorization from this court, the district court lacked jurisdiction to consider a successive § 2255 motion. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244(b)(3), 2255(h) (2012).3 Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSED