alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.44



 


Exhibit 10.44


 


ASSIGNMENT FOR SECURITY


 


[TRADEMARKS] [PATENTS] [COPYRIGHTS]


 


WHEREAS, ______________________________
(the “Assignor”) [has adopted, used and is using, and holds all right, title and interest in and to, the trademarks
and service marks listed on the annexed Schedule 1A, which trademarks and service marks are registered or applied for in
the United States Patent and Trademark Office (the “Trademarks”)] [holds all right, title and interest in the
letter patents, design patents and utility patents listed on the annexed Schedule 1A, which patents are issued or applied
for in the United States Patent and Trademark Office (the “Patents”)] [holds all right, title and interest in
the copyrights listed on the annexed Schedule 1A, which copyrights are registered in the United States Copyright Office
(the “Copyrights”)];


 


WHEREAS, the Assignor
has entered into a Pledge and Security Agreement, dated as of [___________ __], 2014 (as amended, restated or otherwise modified
from time to time the “Security Agreement”), in favor of Hudson Bay Master Fund Ltd., as collateral agent
for certain buyers (the “Assignee”);


 


WHEREAS, pursuant
to the Security Agreement, the Assignor has assigned to the Assignee and granted to the Assignee for the benefit of the Buyers
(as defined in the Security Agreement) a continuing security interest in all right, title and interest of the Assignor in, to and
under the [Trademarks, together with, among other things, the good-will of the business symbolized by the Trademarks] [Patents]
[Copyrights] and the applications and registrations thereof, and all proceeds thereof, including, without limitation, any and all
causes of action which may exist by reason of infringement thereof and any and all damages arising from past, present and future
violations thereof (the “Collateral”), to secure the payment, performance and observance of the “Obligations”
(as defined in the Security Agreement);


 


NOW, THEREFORE, for
good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Assignor does hereby pledge,
convey, sell, assign, transfer and set over unto the Assignee and grants to the Assignee for the benefit of the Buyers a continuing
security interest in the Collateral to secure the prompt payment, performance and for the benefit of the Buyers observance of the
Obligations.


 


The Assignor does
hereby further acknowledge and affirm that the rights and remedies of the Assignee with respect to the Collateral are more fully
set forth in the Security Agreement, the terms and provisions of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference as if fully
set forth herein.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the Assignor has caused this Assignment for Security to be duly executed by its officer thereunto duly authorized as of _____________,
20__


 


	 	GRANTOR
	 	 	 
	 	By:	 
	 	Name:	 
	 	Title: 	 


 




    	 



    	 



    


 


SCHEDULE
1A TO ASSIGNMENT FOR SECURITY


 


[Trademarks
and Trademark Applications]


 


[Patent and Patent Applications]


 


[Copyright and Copyright Applications]


 


Owned by ______________________________
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****    - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский 

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

        - Student Loans
        - Grants
        - Laws
        - Data

            - taxonomy view
            - Oregon 

# Oregon 

# Oregon 

                      -  July 15, 2021  U.S. Department of Education Approves Oregon’s Plan for Use of American Rescue Plan Funds to Support K-12 Schools and Students, Distributes Remaining $374 Million To State  
Today, the U.S.  Department of Education (Department) announced the approval of Oregon's  American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ARP  ESSER) plan and distributed remaining ARP ESSER funds to them.
  **Tags:**OregonAmerican Rescue PlanPress Releases

## How Do I Find...?

                      - Student loans, forgiveness
                      - Higher Education Rulemaking
                      - College accreditation
                      - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
                      - FERPA
                      - FAFSA
                      - 1098, tax forms
                      - More...

## Information About...

                      - Elevating Teaching
                      - Early Learning
                      - Engage Every Student
                      - Unlocking Career Success
                      - Cybersecurity

----

*Our mission* is to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness by fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access.

          - Student Loans
          - Repaying Loans
          - Defaulted Loans
          - Loan Forgiveness
          - Loan Servicers
          - Grants & Programs
          - Apply for Pell Grants
          - Grants Forecast
          - Apply for a Grant

          - Laws & Guidance
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - Civil Rights
          - IDEA Website
          - Data & Research
          - Education Statistics
          - Postsecondary Education Data
          - ED Data Express
          - Nation's Report Card
          - What Works Clearinghouse
          - Open Data Platform
          - COVID Relief Data

          - About Us
          - Contact Us
          - ED Offices
          - Jobs
          - Press Releases
          - FAQs
          - Recursos en español
          - Budget, Performance
          - Privacy Program
          - Homeroom Blog

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information Quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02 - 10 - 00402 - CR

NATALIE FAYE MULL APPELLANT
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

---------- FROM THE 371ST DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

---------- 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

---------- Appellant Natalie Faye Mull pled guilty pursuant to a plea bargain to possession of a controlled substance, namely methamphetamine, in an amount of more than one gram but less than four gram s, and the trial court placed her on deferred adjudication community supervi sion for four years and ordered her to pay a $400 fine

. Less than a year later, the State moved to proceed to adjudication, alleging several violations of the conditions of community

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

supervision

. Appellant pled true to all allegations. After a hearing, the trial court adjudicated Appellant’s guilt and sentenced her to pay a $1,000 fine and to serve ten years’ confinement but probated the confinement portion of the sentence, retaining Appellant on community supervision for ten years and adding the complet ion of the SAFP program to her community supervision conditions

. Appellant ’ s court

- appointed appellate counsel has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel and a brief in support of that motion. In the brief, counsel avers that, in his professional opinion, this appeal is frivolous. Counsel ’ s brief and motion meet the requirements of Anders v. Californi a 2 by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds for relief. 3 This court afforded Appellant the oppor tunity to file a brief on
h er own behalf, but s he did not do so

. Once an appellant ’ s court

- appointed counsel files a motion to withdraw on the ground that the appeal is frivolous and fulfills the requirements of Anders , we are obligated to undertake an ind ependent examination of the record to see if there is any arguable ground that may be raised on h er behalf. 4 Only then may we grant counsel ’ s motion to withdraw. 5

2 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967).

3 See Stafford v. State , 813 S.W.2d 503, 510

– 11 & n.3 ( Tex. Crim. App. 1991).

4 See id. at 511.

5 See Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 82

– 83, 109 S. Ct. 346, 351 (1988).3

We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel ’ s brief. We agree with
counsel that the a ppeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. 6 Consequently, we grant the motion to withdraw and affirm the trial court ’ s judgment.

PER CURIAM
PANEL: DAUPHINOT, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and WILLIAM BRIGHAM (Senior Justice, Retired, Sitting by Assignment). DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App

. P. 47.2(b )
DELIVERED: June 9, 2011

6 See Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824, 827 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
# C_2022294EN.01001601.xml

| 1.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/16

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo (Portugal) lodged on 10 May 2022 — FL v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira

(Case C-312/22)

(2022/C 294/22)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Supremo Tribunal Administrativo

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: FL

Respondent: Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira

Question referred

Is it compatible with EU law for income in the form of interest on bonds and debt instruments paid by a non-resident Swiss bank to the appellant in 2005 to be subject to income aggregation and therefore to be taxed at the same rate of income tax as other income, meaning that the applicable rate of tax is far higher than the rate (levy) that would apply had the income in question been paid by a bank resident in national territory?

---
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Threat Reduction Agency 

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  About    -  DTRA Leadership             
  -  DTRA History             
  -  Mission             
  -  Strategic Initiatives             
  -  Foreign Malign Influence             
  -  Agency Overview Brief (pdf)             
  -  Agency Financial Report 
-  Careers & Opportunities    -  Your Civilian Career             
  -  Your Military Career             
  -  Welcome Aboard             
  -  Diversity and Inclusion 
-  Business    -  DTRA Contract Award Data             
  -  Office of Small Business             
  -  Mentor Protege Program 
-  News & Media    -  Press Center 
-  Contact Us		 
-  Joint Operations Center		 

# Foreign Malign Influence Fact Sheets

Aug. 1, 2023

 Biological Threat Reduction Program Global Nuclear Security  

                                The Global Nuclear Security (GNS) Program supports the cooperative dismantlement of nuclear weapon programs, as well as the transportation and disposition of related systems and associated materials. The GNS Program builds international partner capacity and expertise to secure nuclear weapons, nuclear weapons-usable or high-threat radiological materials, nuclear weapons components, equipment, technology, and expertise, and to counter nuclear smuggling.             

### Stay Connected

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**
MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 19

- 00535

- CR Jason David KIMBALL , Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2018CR10002 Honorable Catherine Torres

- Stahl, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Delivered and Fil ed: September 11, 2019
DIS MISSED The trial court’s certification in this appeal states that “this criminal case is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” The clerk’s record contains a written plea bargain, and the punishment as sessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant; therefore, the trial court’s certification accurately reflects that the underlying case is a plea

- bargain case. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 25.2(a)(2). Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides, “The appeal must be dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has a right of appeal has not been made part04

- 19

- 00535

- CR

- 2

- of the record under these rules.” T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 25.2(d). On August 2 1, 2019, we ordered that this appeal would be dismissed pursuant to rule 25.2(d) unless an amended trial court certification showing that the appellant has the right of appeal was made part of the appellate record by September 19, 2019. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 25.2(d); 37.1; see also Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); Daniels v. State , 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2003, no pet.). Appellant’s counsel has filed a written response stating that counsel reviewed the record and “can f ind no certified right of appeal for a ppellant.” As a result, counse l concedes this court “must dismiss the instant attempted appeal.” See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 25.2(d); 37.1; see also Daniels
v. State , 110 S.W.3d 174, 177 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2003, no pet.) . In light of the record presented, we agree with appellant’s counsel that Rule 25.2(d) requires this court to dismiss this appeal. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.
PER CURIAM
DO NOT PUBLISH
---



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549



FORM 8-K



CURRENT REPORT



Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934



Date of Report (date of earliest event reported): March 27, 2003



LYONDELL CHEMICAL COMPANY

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



Delaware

(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation)



|1-10145                                         |  | 95-4160558                          
|----------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------
|(Commission File Number)                        |  | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|                                               
|1221 McKinney Street, Suite 700, Houston, Texas |  | 77010                               
|(Address of principal executive offices)        |  | (Zip Code)                          



(713)
652-7200

(Registrants telephone number, including area code)



Not Applicable

(Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)



---



---



Item 5. Other Events and
Regulation FD Disclosure.



On March 27, 2003, Lyondell
Chemical Company (Lyondell) announced that its joint venture Equistar Chemicals, LP (Equistar) is entering into a 15-year propylene supply arrangement with Sunoco, Inc. (Sunoco) and is selling its Bayport
polypropylene manufacturing unit in Pasadena, Texas to Sunoco. Lyondells March 27, 2003 press release regarding these transactions is attached as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K. The transactions are effective as of March 31,
2003.



The total consideration to Equistar for the supply
arrangements and asset sale is approximately $190 million, plus the value of the Bayport polypropylene inventory. The net proceeds received by Equistar have initially been used to repay all $104 million of borrowings then-outstanding under
Equistars revolving credit facility.



As a result of the
transactions, the commitment under Equistars revolving credit facility has been reduced by $96 million, to $354 million.



Item 7. Financial Statements and Exhibits.



(c) Exhibits.



99.1    Press Release



---



SIGNATURE



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.



LYONDELL CHEMICAL COMPANYBy:

/s/ KERRY A. GALVINName:    Kerry A. Galvin Title:       Senior Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary




Date: March 31,
2003



---



INDEX TO
EXHIBITS



|Exhibit Number |  | Description  
|-------------- |  | -------------
|              
|99.1           |  | Press Release
# Euroopan unionin C 179A/25.

| | ISSN 1977-1053 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopan unionin
  virallinen lehti | C 179A |
| | |
| Suomenkielinen laitos | Tiedonantoja ja ilmoituksia | 61. vuosikerta25. toukokuu 2018 |

ISSN 1977-1053

Euroopan unionin

virallinen lehti

C 179A

Suomenkielinen laitos

Tiedonantoja ja ilmoituksia

61. vuosikerta25. toukokuu 2018

---

| Sisältö | Sivu |
| --- | --- |
| | Oikaisuja |
| 2018/C 179 A/01 | Oikaisu palvelukseenottoilmoitukseen nro PE/197/S ( EUVL C 144 A, 25.4.2018 ) | 1 |

Sisältö

Sivu

Oikaisuja

2018/C 179 A/01

Oikaisu palvelukseenottoilmoitukseen nro PE/197/S ( EUVL C 144 A, 25.4.2018 )

( EUVL C 144 A, 25.4.2018 )

1

---

| FI | |
| --- | --- |

FI

---

Oikaisuja

| 25.5.2018 | FI | Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti | CA 179/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.5.2018

FI

Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti

CA 179/1

---

Oikaisu palvelukseenottoilmoitukseen nro PE/197/S

(
  Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti C 144 A, 25. huhtikuuta 2018
  )

(2018/C 179 A/01)

Sivulla 1:

on:

”Euroopan parlamentti järjestää tutkintotodistuksiin ja kokeisiin perustuvan valintamenettelyn soveltuvien hakijoiden luettelon laatimiseksi seuraavien yhdentoista toimen täyttämistä varten:”

pitää olla:

pitää olla:

”Euroopan parlamentti järjestää tutkintotodistuksiin ja kokeisiin perustuvan valintamenettelyn soveltuvien hakijoiden luettelon laatimiseksi seuraavien tointen täyttämistä varten:”

Sivulla 2, A otsikko, kohta 1. Yleistä, ensimmäinen kappale:

Sivulla 2, A otsikko, kohta 1. Yleistä, ensimmäinen kappale:

on:

on:

”Euroopan parlamentti on päättänyt järjestää menettelyn yhdentoista henkilösuojauksesta vastaavan henkilön väliaikaisen toimen (AST 3) täyttämiseksi turvallisuusasioiden pääosaston lähi- ja tukipalvelujen ja turvallisuuden osastossa.”

pitää olla:

pitää olla:

”Euroopan parlamentti on päättänyt järjestää menettelyn henkilösuojauksesta vastaavien henkilöiden väliaikaisten tointen (AST 3) täyttämiseksi turvallisuusasioiden pääosaston lähi- ja tukipalvelujen ja turvallisuuden osastossa.”

---
# C_2022191EN.01002402.xml

| 10.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 191/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 191/24

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 8 March 2022 — Criminal proceedings against BK

(Case C-175/22)

(2022/C 191/31)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad

Party to the main proceedings

BK

Questions referred

Does Article 6(3) and (4) of Directive 2012/13/EU (1) preclude an interpretation of national legal provisions — Article 301(1)(2), in conjunction with Article 287(1), of the Nakazatelno protsesualen kodeks (Code of Criminal Procedure, Bulgaria; ‘the NPK’) — in the case-law according to which the court may, in its judgment, give a legal classification of the offence that differs from that set out in the bill of indictment, provided that it is not classified as an offence attracting a more severe penalty, on the ground that the accused person was not properly informed of the new, different legal classification before the delivery of the judgment and was unable to defend himself against it?

If Question 1 is answered in the affirmative: Does the second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter prohibit the court from informing the accused person that it could base its decision on the merits on a different legal classification of the offence, and also from giving him the opportunity to prepare his defence against that classification, because the initiative for this different legal classification did not come from the public prosecutor’s office?

---

(1)  Directive 2012/13/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2012 on the right to information in criminal proceedings (OJ 2012 L 142, p. 1).

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> UT
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      209,166
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                          0
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          18,860
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        33,179
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 261,205
<COMMON>                                         1,244
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       42,454
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             47,479
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                  91,177
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      3,200
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                            88,976
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              11,800
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                    3,393
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                  62,659
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  261,205
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      179,339
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             4,728
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     158,195
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     162,923
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         16,416
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 935
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  17,351
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         7,556
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,795
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        348
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                    9,447
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         4,775
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        6,806
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          27,964
<EPS-BASIC>                                       7.60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     7.60


</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                                                                     EXHIBIT 32g


        Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18
                            of the United States Code


     I, E. James Ferland, Chief Executive Officer of PSEG Energy Holdings
L.L.C., to the best of my knowledge, certify that (i) the Annual Report of PSEG
Energy Holdings L.L.C. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the PSEG Energy Holdings L.L.C.




                                                  /s/ E. James Ferland
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  E. James Ferland
                                                  PSEG Energy Holdings L.L.C
                                                  Chief Executive Officer
                                                  February 28, 2005