THE U.S. ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION 

ANNUAL GRANT EXPENDITURE REPORT 

FISCAL YEAR 2019 

September 20, 2020 
 

ANNUAL GRANT EXPENDITURE REPORT 

Fiscal Year 2019 

Overview 

The U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) was created by Congress in 2002 to improve the 

administration of elections for federal offices through funding, guidance and policy development under the

Help America Vote Act of 2002 (HAVA). HAVA provides funding to state and local election districts to 

support upgrading systems for casting votes, registering voters in statewide voter registration databases, 

providing provisional voting options, and implementing other improvements to the administration of 

federal elections, such as training for election officials and poll workers, polling place accessibility

improvements, and disseminating information on how and where to vote. 

Between 2003 and September 30, 2019, a total of $3,632,751,4751 in federal funds had been awarded to 50 

states, the District of Columbia and four U.S. territories (American Samoa, the Commonwealth of Puerto 

Rico, Guam and the United States Virgin Islands) hereinafter referred to collectively as states. This total

includes $380 million appropriated by Congress in 2018 to improve the administration of federal elections, 

with an emphasis on security enhancements to election systems. This 2018 appropriation was the first

time since 2010 that the federal government made resources available through HAVA to support federal 

election improvements. States have reported total expenditures of $3,448,244,244, or 86 percent of total 

federal funds and accrued interest, available under Sections 101, 102 and 251 of HAVA. This total includes 

$92,288,293 in spending associated with the 2018 awards. 

Under HAVA, funds are available to the states until fully expended. In 2019, the EAC completed a process 

to close out expended funds in long-standing grants through September 30, 2018, and carry forward any

unexpended funds into new grant amendments. This process allowed states to follow federal grant 

closeout policy related to record retention. During that process, the EAC conducted final closeouts on 24 

Section 101 and 11 Section 251 grants. States had fully expended all federal, state and interest funds under 

those grants and are no longer required to submit financial and progress reports. EAC amended the grants 

to carry forward remaining funds for those states that had not fully expended their funds. 

1 This amount includes $300.3 million in Section 102 funds and $380 million in 2019 Section 101 Election Security

funds. 

Page 2 of 11 
 

 

HAVA Section 101 Funds 

In 2003, EAC disbursed $349,182,262 to states under Section 101 of HAVA for activities to improve the

administration of federal elections. Section 101 funds are the most flexible funds available to States 

through HAVA for administering and improving federal elections because the funds by law can be deployed

without first meeting the requirements of Title III of HAVA. Section 101 funds have been used for wideranging activities including voter education, developing the State Plan and training poll workers, and 

securing and storing voting equipment. 

Section 101 funds have been used to conduct preliminary planning for Statewide Voter Registration 

Systems and to upgrade and replace county voter registration election management systems for 

compatibility with new voter registration systems. States have implemented voter education programs and

conducted training for election officials and poll workers. Another key result has been making polling 

places accessible and providing voter materials at polling places in multiple languages. 

As of September 30, 2019, states reported total expenditures of $365,306,979, which includes expenditures

of federal funds and accumulated interest over the course of the award. Thirty states have spent all of their 

Section 101 funds and interest and another 21 states have spent at least 90 percent of their funds. Table 1

provides a full accounting of expenditures by states which reflect almost 91.6% of federal funds and 

interest expended. 

Table 1: Section 101 HAVA Funds as of September 30, 2019 

Total 101 Interest Total Balance of Funds State Funds Received Earned Expenditures and Interest 

ALABAMA $4,989,605 $2,667 $4,823,431 $168,841 

ALASKA $5,000,000 $1,087,315 $5,676,414 $410,901 

ARIZONA $5,451,369 $1,010,134 $2,095,600 $4,365,903 

CALIFORNIA $26,804,708 $2,740,570 $27,381,278 $2,164,000 

CONNECTICUT* $5,000,000 $682,868 $5,682,868 $0 

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA* $5,000,000 $408,108 $5,408,108 $0 

GEORGIA $7,816,328 $713,171 $7,816,328 $713,171 

HAWAII $5,000,000 $1,369,777 $1,773,535 $4,596,242 

ILLINOIS $11,129,030 $1,270,134 $12,195,182 $203,982 

AMERICAN SAMOA $1,000,000 $66,224 $1,000,000 $66,224 

ARKANSAS* $3,593,165 $226,288 $3,819,453 $0 

COLORADO $4,860,301 $1,056,513 $5,916,814 $0 

DELAWARE $5,000,000 $472,080 $5,467,766 $4,314 

FLORIDA $14,447,580 $1,859,810 $14,447,580 $1,859,810 

GUAM $1,000,000 $12,773 $1,012,773 $0 

IDAHO* $5,000,000 $1,807,418 $6,807,418 $0 

INDIANA $6,230,481 $938,781 $7,196,262 -$27,000 

IOWA* $5,000,000 $690,082 $5,690,082 $0 

KANSAS $5,000,000 $1,400,123 $3,959,832 $2,440,292 

Page 3 of 11 
KENTUCKY $4,699,196 $1,024,965 $4,699,196 $1,024,965 

LOUISIANA* $4,911,421 $935,421 $5,846,842 $0 

MAINE $5,000,000 $611,789 $5,607,822 $3,967 

MARYLAND $5,636,731 $551,709 $6,188,440 $0 

MASSACHUSETTS* $6,590,381 $904,363 $7,494,744 $0 

MINNESOTA* $5,313,786 $64,724 $5,378,510 $0 

MISSOURI* $5,875,170 $954,107 $6,829,277 $0 

NEBRASKA* $5,000,000 $998,292 $5,998,292 $0 

NEW HAMPSHIRE $5,000,000 $1,296,921 $2,463,272 $3,833,649 

NEW MEXICO* $5,000,000 $292,244 $5,292,244 $0 

NORTH CAROLINA $7,887,740 $757,737 $8,639,321 $6,156 

OHIO* $10,384,931 $426,837 $10,811,768 $0 

OREGON* $4,203,776 $59,199 $4,262,975 $0 

PUERTO RICO $3,151,144 $324,190 $3,474,602 $732 

SOUTH CAROLINA $4,652,412 $891,665 $5,312,877 $231,201 

TENNESSEE $6,004,507 $1,065,545 $6,686,421 $383,631 

MICHIGAN $9,207,323 $1,684,045 $9,884,787 $1,006,581 

MISSISSIPPI* $3,673,384 $443,500 $4,116,884 $0 

MONTANA $5,000,000 $399,279 $5,310,004 $89,275 

NEVADA* $5,000,000 $452,843 $5,452,843 $0 

NEW JERSEY $8,141,208 $650,000 $8,791,208 $0 

NEW YORK $16,494,325 $4,102,603 $15,847,784 $4,749,144 

NORTH DAKOTA* $5,000,000 $63,997 $5,063,997 $0 

OKLAHOMA* $5,000,000 $353,656 $5,353,656 $0 

PENNSYLVANIA* $11,323,168 $1,301,492 $12,624,660 $0 

RHODE ISLAND* $5,000,000 $140,275 $5,140,275 $0 

SOUTH DAKOTA $5,000,000 $2,434,031 $5,049,623 $2,384,408 

TEXAS $17,206,595 $3,781,531 $19,438,981 $1,549,146 

U. S. VIRGIN ISLANDS $1,000,000 $21,806 $1,000,000 $21,806 

VERMONT* $5,000,000 $580,051 $5,580,051 $0 

WASHINGTON* $6,098,449 $259,047 $6,357,496 $0 

WISCONSIN $5,694,036 $978,071 $6,672,107 $0 

UTAH* $3,090,943 $560,156 $3,651,099 $0 

VIRGINIA* $7,105,890 $1,130,578 $8,236,468 $0 

WEST VIRGINIA* $2,977,057 $104,747 $3,081,804 $0 

WYOMING $5,000,000 $1,662,754 $5,495,929 $1,166,825 

Total $348,646,140 $50,079,005 $365,306,979 $33,418,166 

The asterisk (*) denotes grants EAC closed in 2019. Federal funds and earned interest were fully expended. 

EAC awarded $349,182,262. The lower amount received reflects a deobligation of $536,122 as a result of an audit finding. 

Page 4 of 11 
 

 

 

 

 

HAVA Section 101 Election Security Funds 

As noted earlier, the Congress provided an additional $380,000,000 through the Omnibus Appropriations

Act of 2018 in March of 2018 to improve the administration of elections for federal office, especially to 

enhance election technology and make election security improvements. The funding provided states with

additional resources to secure and improve election systems. The EAC awarded these funds to the 50 

states, the District of Columbia and four U.S. Territories (American Samoa, Guam, Puerto Rico and the U.S. 

Virgin Islands) eligible to receive them through a formula described in Sections 101 and 104 of the Help

America Vote Act of 2002 (P.L. 107-252) (HAVA). To access the funds, states provided a budget and a 

program narrative describing how they would use the funds. The EAC requested funding allocations in five 

main areas: 

• Voting Equipment 

• Post-Election Auditing 

• Voter Registration Systems 

• Cyber Security 

• Communication 

States had the option to describe additional areas for expenditures and several states included funding

allocations to improve accessibility for individuals with disabilities, support security training for poll 

workers and staff and implement software upgrades to equipment to improve security. As of September 30, 

2019, states had spent a total of $92,288,293 or 24.3% of the funds, which includes expenditures of federal

funds and accumulated interest. Table 2 provides a state-by-state view of funds and expenditures under 

the 2018 grants. 

Table 2: Section 101 Election Security HAVA Funds as of September 30, 2019 

Awarded April 2018 

Balance of Funds State Funds Received Interest Earned Expenditures and Interest 

ALABAMA $6,160,393 $92,697 $595,528 $5,657,563 

ALASKA $3,000,000 $106,034 $20,982 $3,085,053 

ARIZONA $7,463,675 $213,817 $2,452,425 $5,225,067 

CALIFORNIA $34,558,874 $387,975 $66,771 $34,880,079 

CONNECTICUT $5,120,554 $88,431 $919,703 $4,289,282 

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA $3,000,000 $66,864 $914,698 $2,152,166 

AMERICAN SAMOA $600,000 $0 $232,228 $367,772 

ARKANSAS $4,475,015 $31,614 $4,475,015 $31,614 

COLORADO $6,342,979 $167,061 $592,700 $5,917,340 

DELAWARE $3,000,000 $0 $3,000,000 $0 

FLORIDA $19,187,003 $53,821 $17,240,566 $2,000,258 

GEORGIA $10,305,783 $0 $433,243 $9,872,540 

GUAM $600,000 $2,050 $62,091 $539,959 

Page 5 of 11 
HAWAII $3,134,080 $0 $0 $3,134,080 

IDAHO $3,229,896 $77,281 $788,160 $2,519,017 

ILLINOIS $13,232,290 $345,737 $1,290,619 $12,287,408 

INDIANA $7,595,088 $178,683 $6,934,989 $838,782 

IOWA $4,608,084 $97,460 $1,032,782 $3,672,762 

KENTUCKY $5,773,423 $35,487 $3,612,874 $2,196,036 

MAINE $3,130,979 $60,622 $31,912 $3,159,689 

MASSACHUSETTS $7,890,854 $76,125 $1,654,651 $6,312,328 

MINNESOTA $6,595,610 $196,892 $47,169 $6,745,333 

MISSOURI $7,230,625 $171,417 $757,418 $6,644,623 

NEBRASKA $3,496,936 $105,338 $79,187 $3,523,087 

NEW HAMPSHIRE $3,102,253 $73,465 $821,841 $2,353,877 

NEW MEXICO $3,699,470 $87,881 $1,545,147 $2,242,204 

NORTH CAROLINA $10,373,237 $0 $0 $10,373,237 

OHIO $12,186,021 $327,847 $6,125,850 $6,388,018 

OREGON $5,362,981 $179,978 $509,286 $5,033,673 

PUERTO RICO $3,676,962 $0 $589,662 $3,087,300 

SOUTH CAROLINA $6,040,794 $129,736 $1,543,465 $4,627,065 

TENNESSEE $7,565,418 $164,090 $1,741,666 $5,987,842 

UTAH $4,111,052 $87,114 $477,977 $3,720,189 

U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS $600,000 $2,580 $243,761 $358,819 

KANSAS $4,383,595 $62,802 $0 $4,446,397 

LOUISIANA $5,889,487 $133,509 $0 $6,022,996 

MARYLAND $7,063,699 $15,905 $123,114 $6,956,490 

MICHIGAN $10,706,992 $307,366 $300,615 $10,713,744 

MISSISSIPPI $4,483,541 $86,985 $1,267,121 $3,303,405 

MONTANA $3,000,000 $86,423 $918,146 $2,168,277 

NEVADA $4,277,723 $80,579 $603,034 $3,755,267 

NEW JERSEY $9,757,450 $234,697 $375,003 $9,617,144 

NEW YORK $19,483,647 $513,670 $6,613,982 $13,383,335 

NORTH DAKOTA $3,000,000 $8,880 $0 $3,008,880 

OKLAHOMA $5,196,017 $149,882 $0 $5,345,899 

PENNSYLVANIA $13,476,156 $333,143 $3,898,769 $9,910,530 

RHODE ISLAND $3,000,000 $51,525 $1,729,753 $1,321,772 

SOUTH DAKOTA $3,000,000 $92,794 $201,518 $2,891,277 

TEXAS $23,252,604 $673,695 $2,828,492 $21,097,807 

VERMONT $3,000,000 $63,867 $1,057,597 $2,006,270 

VIRGINIA $9,080,731 $186,388 $1,317,673 $7,949,446 

WASHINGTON $7,907,768 $154,502 $3,891,533 $4,170,737 

WEST VIRGINIA $3,611,943 $40,496 $3,587,122 $65,316 

WISCONSIN $6,978,318 $199,584 $2,661,915 $4,515,987 

Page 6 of 11 
 

 

 

 

 

WYOMING $3,000,000 $103,117 $78,540 $3,024,577 

Totals $380,000,000 $7,187,907 $92,288,293 $294,899,614 

States also report their expenditures by spending categories they provided in their original program 

narratives describing how they would spend the funds. Table 3 shows the amounts spent through 

September 31, 2019 on six main funding objectives. Of the states that have spent over 80% of their funds, 

such as Delaware, Arkansas, Florida and West Virginia, the funds were spent to replace voting equipment

that did not provide a paper trail or were allocated to subgrants to local election jurisdictions. Several 

other states will replace voting equipment in advance of the 2020 election. 

Table 3: Election Security HAVA Funds by Project Category 

Spending by Category as of September 30, 2019 

Project Category Amount 

Percent of Total 

Spent 

Cyber Security $48,858,381 52.9% 

Voting Equipment $25,893,420 28.1% 

Voter Registration Systems $9,912,532 10.7% 

Other $6,420,764 7.0% 

Election Auditing $769,237 0.8% 

Communication $429,826 0.5% 

Total $92,284,160 100% 

Cyber Security 

Voting 53% 

Equipment 

28% 

Voter 

Registration 

Systems 

11% 

Other 

7% 

Election Auditing 

1% Communication 

0% 

Spending by Category as of September 30, 2019 

In 2020 EAC staff reviewed state program narratives and identified some themes across their plans to 

enhance election security and improve the administration of federal elections. One strong commonality

between states, irrespective of their relative size or population density, was the choice to spend funds on 

Page 7 of 11 
 

 

 

post-election audits. Colorado, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, and many other states plan some form of 

audit with the funds. These audits, which would continue on an ongoing basis, most often take the form of a

risk-limiting audit (RLA). RLAs involve storing the paper ballots safely and securely and taking a random 

sample of a certain number of paper ballots, counting them by hand, and using statistical inference and

confidence intervals to determine the success of the vote tallying. 

Another common theme among states in building their cybersecurity infrastructure is the execution of 

tabletop exercises. New Jersey, New York, Ohio, the U. S. Virgin Islands, and many other states and

territories are employing tabletop exercises as a way to prepare for unforeseen incidents. Tabletop 

exercises are typically run in conjunction with an expert or a series of experts on security who can guide 

staff through the proper response to a security breach or other problematic election incident. 

States also plan to mitigate election-related computer system cyber vulnerabilities identified through

Department of Homeland Security or similar scans or assessments of existing election systems, such as: 

• Cyber Hygiene Scans 

• Penetration Testing 

• Social Engineering Testing & Training (i.e. Phishing campaign assessments) 

• Database and Operating system scanning 

• Risk Analysis and Risk and Vulnerability Assessments 

• Asset and network architecture reviews 

• System resiliency and redundancy testing 

• DDOS Protection 

• HTTPS/TLS upgrades 

• Two-factor authentication implementation/upgrades 

• Intrusion detection and preventions systems 

Finally, states are planning a wide variety of cybersecurity training for the state chief election official's 

office and local election officials. Various entities conduct training activities in these areas: 

• Cybersecurity Training 

• Information Security & Governance Training 

• Cyber Hygiene Training 

• Risk Mitigation Training 

• Risk and Vulnerability Self-Assessment Training 

• Election Technology and Asset Management Training 

• Critical Infrastructure Training 

• Table Top Exercises 

• Social Engineering Training 

• Information Operations and Communications Training 

• Incident Response, Incident Handling, and Recovery Planning Training 

• Vendor Selection and IT Procurement Training 

• Election Technology Testing and Auditing Training 

• Backup and Recovery Testing and Training 

Page 8 of 11 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

HAVA Section 251 Funds - Requirements Payment Grants 

Section 251 funds, known as Requirements Payments, were distributed to states using a formula required

under HAVA based on a percentage equal to the quotient of the voting age population of each state and the 

total voting age population of all states. States are required to deposit Section 251 funds in interest-bearing

state election accounts and the funds are available until expended. The funds were to be used to: 

• Procure voting systems that comply with the requirements of Title III, Section 301 Voting System 

Standards of HAVA; 

• Implement provisional voting (i.e., allowing a voter whose registration status cannot be confirmed

at the polling place to cast a provisional ballot); 

• Provide information to voters at the polling place such as general information on voting rights; 

• Develop and implement a computerized statewide voter registration list; and 

• Implement identification requirements for first-time voters who register to vote by mail. 

Section 251 funds may also be used for the improvement of the administration of elections for federal office 

if a state certifies to EAC that they have either (1) met the requirements of Title III or (2) will not spend

more than the amount of the minimum payment applicable to the state on such other activities. 

During the closeout process conducted in 2019, the EAC allowed states that had not requested their 2011 

funds at that time to do so. To receive the funds, states had to meet the required 5% state match, deposit

those funds into the state election funds and review their State Plans to determine if an amendment was 

needed to access the funds. During that process, 12 states requested those funds representing about

$1,040,000 in additional 25 funds disbursed by the EAC. 

As of September 30, 2019, 15 states reported spending 100 percent of their HAVA Requirements Payment 

funds (including interest) and another 28 states reported spending 90 percent or more of their funds and 

interest. States reported cumulative expenditures of $2,698,508,681 (See Table 4). Finally, Table 5 is a 

state-by-state graph showing the percentage of all HAVA funds and interest remaining unspent as of 

September 30, 2019. All but 12 states have less than 10% of their funds remaining. The states with higher

percentages include states that had replaced a large portion of their voting equipment just prior to 

receiving HAVA funds. Those states expect to replace voting equipment in the near future and their

balance of unexpended funds will decrease significantly. 

Table 4: Section 251 HAVA Funds as of September 30, 2019 

Balance of 

Funds and 

State Funds Received Interest Earned Total Expenditures Interest 

California $296,305,593 $46,274,099 $269,843,402 $72,736,290 

Page 9 of 11 

Alabama* $40,247,219 $2,529,448 $40,436,652 $2,340,015 

Alaska $13,021,803 $3,421,063 $14,214,587 $2,228,279 

American Samoa $2,490,652 $292,118 $2,782,770 $0 

Arizona $45,516,687 $4,353,350 $47,508,539 $2,361,498 

Arkansas* $24,245,457 $2,542,169 $26,775,820 $11,806 
Colorado $38,767,048 $4,730,760 $42,972,582 $525,227 

Connecticut* $31,109,847 $7,847,073 $38,942,231 $14,689 

Delaware $13,021,803 $1,311,579 $13,004,721 $1,328,661 

District of Columbia $13,028,257 $1,934,737 $14,959,924 $3,070 

Georgia $72,641,827 $1,208,012 $68,462,929 $5,386,910 

Hawaii $13,028,257 $977,446 $12,829,948 $1,175,755 

Illinois $110,597,147 $9,356,384 $118,622,450 $1,331,080 

Iowa $26,645,880 $1,464,817 $28,110,697 $0 

Kentucky* $36,919,262 $5,180,653 $30,404,580 $11,695,334 

Maine* $13,028,257 $1,522,804 $14,544,406 $6,656 

Massachusetts $58,589,550 $12,526,060 $32,464,159 $38,651,451 

Minnesota $43,962,194 $3,761,498 $47,570,361 $153,332 

Missouri $50,394,880 $4,265,288 $54,176,424 $483,744 

Nebraska $15,442,405 $1,046,168 $16,488,573 $0 

New Hampshire* $13,028,257 $2,431,164 $10,410,561 $5,048,860 

New Mexico $15,599,671 $271,854 $15,871,525 $0 

North Carolina* $73,460,046 $7,349,173 $78,886,117 $1,923,102 

Ohio $102,069,874 $6,307,853 108377727.3 $0 

Oregon $31,243,106 $4,085,618 32273780.72 $3,054,943 

Puerto Rico $5,868,252 $222,622 $4,584,124 $1,506,750 

South Carolina $36,384,617 $914,189 $37,121,804 $177,001 

Florida $148,633,048 $24,327,119 $164,691,951 $8,268,216 

Guam $2,319,361 $48,049 $2,367,410 $0 

Idaho $13,021,803 $1,267,652 $14,289,455 $0 

Indiana $54,440,283 $2,280,602 $56,676,561 $44,323 

Kansas $24,033,425 $2,274,074 $25,838,952 $468,547 

Louisiana $39,350,512 $3,552,964 $42,903,476 $0 

Maryland $47,663,156 $3,888,041 $51,551,197 $0 

Michigan* $88,575,455 $7,721,968 $94,971,678 $1,325,745 

Mississippi* $25,164,294 $1,588,892 $26,741,357 $11,829 

Montana $13,028,257 $618,633 $13,979,996 -$333,106 

Nevada $18,155,632 $1,272,294 $19,427,926 $0 

New Jersey $76,360,392 $5,808,946 $82,169,338 $0 

New York $172,076,865 $33,143,176 $194,119,725 $11,100,316 

North Dakota $13,028,257 $1,356,359 $14,384,616 $0 

Oklahoma* $31,043,081 $4,214,988 $30,492,597 $4,765,472 

Pennsylvania $112,821,809 $16,861,352 $125,106,929 $4,576,231 

Rhode Island* $13,028,257 $485,182 $13,506,985 $6,454 

South Dakota $13,028,257 $5,237,852 $13,435,600 $4,830,509 

Tennessee $51,877,746 $7,506,630 $33,001,879 $26,382,497 

Texas $180,251,801 $12,381,621 $192,633,426 -$5 

Page 10 of 11 
 

U. S. Virgin Islands $2,319,361 $2,179 $2,319,361 $2,179 

Vermont $12,453,257 $2,892,693 $8,765,516 $6,580,433 

Washington $52,955,253 $6,614,605 $57,242,745 $2,327,113 

Wisconsin $48,296,088 $4,367,057 $52,663,144 $0 

Utah* $18,491,597 $722,728 $18,568,105 $646,220 

Virginia $64,499,288 $9,562,569 $74,061,857 $0 

West Virginia $17,184,960 $1,218,236 $17,591,293 $811,903 

Wyoming $13,028,257 $1,088,258 $14,112,761 $3,754 

Total $2,603,787,598 $300,432,717 $2,680,258,114 $223,962,201 

Asterisk * indicates states that requested and received their 2011 funds in 2019.

EAC awarded $2,603,857,487. The lower amount received reflects a deobligation of 69,890 as a result of an audit 

finding. 

Negative amounts result from state including some state expenditures as federal. 

Table 5: Remaining HAVA Funds and Interest as of September 30, 2018 

(Excludes 2018 Section 101 Funds) 

State Percent of 

Funds Remaining WASHINGTON 5% 

MASSACHUSETTS 48% WEST VIRGINIA 3% 

NEW HAMPSHIRE 41% NORTH CAROLINA 2% 

TENNESSEE 38% MICHIGAN 2% 

VERMONT 36% PENNSYLVANIA 2% 

HAWAII 30% AMERICAN SAMOA 2% 

SOUTH DAKOTA 26% SOUTH CAROLINA 2% 

KENTUCKY 26% NEW JERSEY 1% 

CALIFORNIA 17% DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 1% 

PUERTO RICO 16% COLORADO 1% 

ARIZONA 12% TEXAS 1% 

OKLAHOMA 11% WISCONSIN 1% 

ALASKA 11% VIRGINIA 1% 

NEW YORK 8% U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS 1% 

ILLINOIS 8% MISSOURI 1% 

OREGON 7% MINNESOTA 0% 

GEORGIA 7% IOWA 0% 

KANSAS 6% MARYLAND 0% 

DELAWARE 6% MAINE 0% 

WYOMING 6% MISSISSIPPI 0% 

ALABAMA 5% ARKANSAS 0% 

FLORIDA 5% RHODE ISLAND 0% 

CONNECTICUT 0% 

INDIANA 0% 

Page 11 of 11