alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2022084EN.01004402.xml

| 21.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 84/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 84/44

---

Action brought on 27 December 2021 — Grupo Eig Multimedia v EUIPO — Globalización de Valores CFC & GCI (FORO16)

(Case T-796/21)

(2022/C 84/63)

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Grupo Eig Multimedia, SL (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: D. Solana Giménez, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Globalización de Valores CFC & GCI, SL (Mairena del Aljarafe, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for the EU figurative mark FORO16 — Application for registration No 18 036 099

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 October 2021 in Case R 1785/2020-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision and uphold the applicant’s claims, revoking the initial agreement and in its place, issuing a new decision refusing registration of the trade mark at issue; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision and uphold the applicant’s claims, revoking the initial agreement and in its place, issuing a new decision refusing registration of the trade mark at issue;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
#### UNITED STATES of America, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Raghvendra SINGH, Respondent-Appellant.

No. 17-15659

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*634Submitted February 13, 2018 *

Filed February 23, 2018

Clint Carpenter, Thomas J. Clark, Supervisory Attorney, DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice, Tax Division/Appellate Section, Washington, DC, for Petitioner-Appellee

Raghvendra Singh, Pro Se

Before: LEAVY, FERNANDEZ, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes Ais case is suitable for decision wiAout oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Raghvendra Singh appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his motion to have the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) reassess and reconsider his tax liabilities, and the district court’s award of attorney’s fees and costs to the government. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a district court’s determination regarding subject matter jurisdiction. *Dexter v. Colvin,*731 F.3d 977, 980 (9th Cir. 2013). We affirm.

The district court properly denied Singh’s motion to reconsider his taxes as barred by the Anti-Injunction Act (“the Act”), 26 U.S.C. § 7421(a), because Singh sought to restrain the government’s tax assessment and collection activities, and' no exception to the Act applies. *See Elias v. Connett,*908 F.2d 521, 523 (9th Cir. 1990) (“The district court must dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction any suit that does not fall within one of the exceptions to the Act.”); *see also*26 U.S.C. § 7421(a) (listing statutory exceptions); *Elias,*908 F.2d at 525 (discussing limited judicial exception).

The district court did not abuse its discretion when it awarded the government attorney’s fees and costs incurred in litigating contempt proceedings against Singh. *See Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Legal & Prof'l Publ’ns, Inc. v. Multistate Legal Studies, Inc.,*26 F.3d 948, 953 (9th Cir. 1994) (district courts have discretion to award attorney’s fees and costs for civil contempt to make party injured by the contempt whole); *Bowman v. Block,*940 F.2d 1211, 1235 (9th Cir. 1991) (standard of review).

To the extent that Singh challenges the district court’s contempt order and the order enforcing the IRS summons, this court in *United States v. Singh,*Case No. 16-15853, dismissed his appeal of these orders for lack of appellate jurisdiction. This court dismissed his appeal of the contempt order as moot, and his appeal of the order enforcing the IRS summons as untimely.

We reject as without merit Singh’s contentions regarding due process violations, any judicial misconduct by the district court judge, and any fraud or misconduct by the IRS.

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued in the opening briefs, or arguments and allegations raised for the first time on appeal. *See Padgett v. Wright,*587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
# C_2023223EN.01000901.xml

| 26.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 223/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 223/9

---

Appeal brought on 18 November 2022 by WT against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 07 September 2022 in Case T-91/20, WT v Commission

(Case C-712/22 P)

(2023/C 223/11)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: WT (represented by: D. Birkenmaier, Rechtsanwalt; D. Rovetta, et V. Villante, avvocati)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

By order of 04 May 2023, the Court of Justice (Sixth Chamber) held that the appeal is dismissed as being in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded and that WT should bear her own costs.

---
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

In the Interest of K.O., A.O., and O.O.,
Children

No. 06

- 15

- 00100

- CV Appeal from the 307th District Court of Gregg County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 2014

- 1026

- DR ). Opinion delivere d by Justice Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial c ourt

. We note that the appellant s ha ve adequately indicated their inability to pay costs of appeal.

Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED APRIL 14, 2016

BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-50611

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff–Appellee,

versus

RONALD MEJIA-HERNANDEZ,

Defendant–Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 1:15-CR-68-1

Before SMITH, WIENER, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The issue on appeal is whether 18 U.S.C. § 16(b) is unconstitutionally 

vague under Johnson v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015). This matter was 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 25, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-50611 Document: 00513652269 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/25/2016
No. 15-50611

2

put on hold awaiting a decision in No. 15-40041. That appeal has now been 

decided. See United States v. Gonzalez-Longoria, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 14460 

(5th Cir. Aug. 5, 2016) (en banc) (holding against vagueness). 

The parties have filed, at the court’s request, letter briefs addressing the 

proper disposition. The appellant’s attorney, the Federal Public Defender, 

advises that the case is moot, irrespective of the opinion in Gonzalez-Longoria, 

because the appellant has completed his term of imprisonment, has been 

released from federal custody, and presumably has been deported, and he did 

not challenge the unexpired period of supervised release. See United States v. 

Heredia-Holguin, 823 F.3d 337, 343 n.3 (5th Cir. 2016) (en banc). The government urges affirmance or, in the alternative, dismissal for mootness.

The appeal is DISMISSED as moot.

 Case: 15-50611 Document: 00513652269 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/25/2016
# Recognizing Inspiring School Employees (RISE) Award

- Nevada's Carlene Pacheco Named 2023 'Recognizing Inspiring School Employees' (RISE) Awardee U.S. Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona announced today the selection of Carlene Pacheco, paraprofessional, Title VI liaison, and family service specialist at Churchill County High School in the Churchill County School District in Fallon, Nevada, as the 2023 Recognizing Inspiring School Employees (RISE) awardee.   
- Washington State's Melito Ramirez Named America's First ‘Recognizing Inspiring School Employees (RISE)’ Awardee U.S. Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona announced today the selection of Melito Ramirez, an intervention specialist at Walla Walla High School in Washington state, as the nation's first Recognizing Inspiring School Employees (RISE) awardee.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 46 (Monday, March 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 10875]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5839]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Notice of Receipt of Application for Approval

    The following applicant has applied for approval to conduct certain 
activities with birds that are protected in accordance with the Wild 
Bird Conservation Act of 1992. This notice is provided pursuant to 
Section 112(4) of the Wild Bird Conservation Act of 1992, 50 CFR 
15.26(c).
    Applicant: Heather Bright, Psittacine Central, Dover, FL. The 
applicant wishes to establish a cooperative breeding program for the 
Monk or Quaker parakeet (Myiopsitta monachus). Ms. Bright wishes to be 
an active participant in this program with one other private 
individual. The Greater Orlando Bird Club has assumed the responsibilty 
for the oversight of the program.
    Written data or comments should be submitted to the Director, U.S. 
Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Management Authority, 4401 North 
Fairfax Drive, Room 430, Arlington, Virginia 22203 and must be received 
by the Director on or before April 9, 1997.
    Documents and other information submitted with these applications 
are available for review, subject to the requirements of the Privacy 
Act and Freedom of Information Act, by any party who submits a written 
request for a copy of such documents to the following office within 30 
days of the date of publication of this notice: U.S. Fish and Wildlife 
Service, Office of Management Authority, 4401 North Fairfax Drive, Room 
430, Arlington, Virginia 22203. Phone: (703/358-2104); FAX: (703/358-
2281).

    Dated: March 4, 1997.
Susan Lieberman,
Chief, Branch of Operations, Office of Management Authority.
[FR Doc. 97-5839 Filed 3-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 893 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to direct the Bureau of Prisons 

to provide certain voting information to Federal prisoners upon their 

release from prison. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 30, 2019 

Mr. JEFFRIES (for himself, Ms. MENG, and Ms. BARRAGA ́N) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to direct the Bureau 

of Prisons to provide certain voting information to Federal prisoners upon their release from prison. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ex-Offender Voter 

5 Registration Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROVISION OF VOTING INFORMATION TO FEDERAL 

7 PRISONERS. 

8 Section 4042(a)(E) of title 18, United States Code, 

9 is amended by inserting after clause (vii) the following: 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 893 IH

1 ‘‘(viii) The laws and regulations gov2 erning the right of an individual convicted 

3 of a felony who has been released from 

4 prison to vote in each of the 50 States, 

5 and, for the State in which the prisoner 

6 will reside upon release, any voter registra7 tion or application forms that the prisoner 

8 will need to complete in order to vote.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 887 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 294
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 887

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 17, 2019

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                            November 7, 2019

               Reported by Mr. Johnson, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 877 East 1200 South in Orem, Utah, as the ``Jerry C. Washburn Post 
                           Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JERRY C. WASHBURN POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 877 East 1200 South in Orem, Utah, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Jerry C. Washburn Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Jerry C. 
Washburn Post Office Building''.
                                                       Calendar No. 294

116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 887

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 877 East 1200 South in Orem, Utah, as the ``Jerry C. Washburn Post 
                           Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            November 7, 2019

                       Reported without amendment
```
# C_2022368EN.01002101.xml

| 26.9.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 368/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.9.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 368/21

---

Order of the President of the Court of 30 June 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresný súd Prešov — Slovakia) — UR v 365.bank a.s.

(Case C-12/22) (1)

(2022/C 368/36)

Language of the case: Slovak

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 148, 4.4.2022.

---
No. 11-10633.

#### Shong-Ching Tong *v.*Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County.

Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8836 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8836

   To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to prohibit estate 
recovery from certain expansion individuals under the Medicaid program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 2, 2020

 Mr. King of Iowa introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                  the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to prohibit estate 
recovery from certain expansion individuals under the Medicaid program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Housing And Medicaid Legislation for 
Expansion Targets Act'' or the ``HAMLET Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITING ESTATE RECOVERY FROM CERTAIN EXPANSION INDIVIDUALS 
              UNDER THE MEDICAID PROGRAM.

    Section 1917 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396p) is 
amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(i) Prohibition on Estate Recovery From Certain Expansion 
Individuals.--
            ``(1) In general.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
        this section, no recovery or adjustment may be made with 
        respect to the estate of an individual described in section 
        1902(a)(10)(A)(i)(VIII) for medical assistance furnished under 
        a State plan (or waiver of such plan) under this title.
            ``(2) Compensation for past recovery.--A State shall 
        provide for the repayment of any amounts recovered or adjusted 
        during the period beginning on January 1, 2014, and ending on 
        the date of the enactment of this subsection from the estate of 
        an individual described in paragraph (1) for medical assistance 
        furnished under the State plan of such State (or waiver of such 
        plan).''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 23




                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We  hereby  consent  to  the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the Registration
Statement  on  Form  S-8  (Nos.  333-02033,  2-96616,  33-677, 2-83297, 2-81753,
33-17875,  33-19911, 33-25396, 33-25674, 333-73205 and 333-92141) of the Ralston
Purina  Company  of  our report dated November 2, 1999 relating to the financial
statements,  which  appears  in  the  Annual  Report  to  Shareholders, which is
incorporated  in  this  Annual  Report  on  Form  10-K.




/s/  PricewaterhouseCoopers  LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers  LLP
St.  Louis,  Missouri

December  15,  1999
# C_2023252EN.01001301.xml

| 17.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/13

---

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 1 March 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio — Italy) — Gruppo Mauro Saviola Srl v Ministero della Transizione Ecologica (formerly Ministero dell’Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio e del Mare), Comitato nazionale per la gestione della Direttiva 2003/87/CE e per il supporto nella gestione delle attività di progetto del protocollo di Kyoto

(Case C-94/22, (1) Gruppo Mauro Saviola)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Requirements to set out the factual context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer from the Court to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling - Lack of sufficient information - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2023/C 252/14)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Gruppo Mauro Saviola Srl

Defendants: Ministero della Transizione Ecologica (formerly Ministero dell’Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio e del Mare), Comitato nazionale per la gestione della Direttiva 2003/87/CE e per il supporto nella gestione delle attività di progetto del protocollo di Kyoto

Other parties: Rappresentanza della Commissione europea in Italia

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Tribunale amministrativo regionale per il Lazio (Regional Administrative Court, Lazio, Italy) by decision of 25 January 2022 is manifestly inadmissible.

---

(1)  OJ C 191, 10.5.2022.

---
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Royshena HOLT, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-50544 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed March 6, 2018

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Mark Glendon Parenti, Parenti Law, P.L.L.C., Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant

Before STEWART, Chief Judge, and ELROD and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

*415PER CURIAM: *

Royshena Holt pleaded guilty to failing to surrender for service of a federal prison sentence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 3146(a)(2). She was sentenced within the advisory guidelines range to 21 months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release. Holt argues that her sentence is substantively unreasonable because the district court failed to consider the nature and circumstances of the offense. She contends that her attempt to self-surrender to law enforcement received insufficient weight and warranted a more lenient sentence.

Because Holt did not object to the reasonableness of her sentence, we review for plain error only. *United States v. Peltier,*505 F.3d 389, 391-92 (6th Cir. 2007). To show plain error, Holt must show a forfeited error that is clear or obvious and that also affects her substantial rights. *Puckett v. United States,*556 U.S. 129, 135, 129 S.Ct. 1423, 173 L.Ed.2d 266 (2009). If she makes such a showing, this court has discretion to correct the error only if it seriously affects the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings. *Id.*

The record reflects that the district court considered all of the mitigating factors and arguments for leniency but concluded that a within-guidelines sentence was appropriate under the circumstances and in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. *See United States v. Rodriguez,*523 F.3d 519, 525 (5th Cir. 2008). Holt has not shown that the district court committed substantive error, plain or otherwise, in determining her sentence. *See Gall v. United States,*552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007).

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarter report on Form 10-Q of National Housing Trust Limited Partnership (the
Partnership) for the period ending September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Susan E. Basting, Chief Financial Officer of NHT, Inc., general partner of
the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

condition and result of operations of the Partnership.



|                     |  |  |  |    |  |                      |  |                                                                                                                                  
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -- |  | -------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  |  | 
|Date August 31, 2007 |  |  |  | By |  | /s/ Susan E. Basting
|                     |  |  |  |    |  |                      |  | Susan E. Basting, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer NHT, Inc., General Partner for National Housing Trust Limited Partnership