alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2022037EN.01004501.xml

| 24.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 37/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 37/45

---

Action brought on 17 November 2021 — The Chord Company v EUIPO — AVSL Group (CHORD)

(Case T-734/21)

(2022/C 37/59)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: The Chord Company Ltd (Wiltshire, United Kingdom) (represented by: A. Deutsch, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: AVSL Group Ltd (Manchester, United Kingdom)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark CHORD — European Union trade mark No 8 254 229

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 31 August 2021 in Case R 1664/2020-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO and/or the other party to the proceeding before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs incurred by the applicant for the General Court, appeal and the cancellation proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and/or the other party to the proceeding before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs incurred by the applicant for the General Court, appeal and the cancellation proceedings.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(2) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(2) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625;

| — | Infringement of Article 27(2) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 and Article 95 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 27(2) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 and Article 95 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of the right to be heard pursuant to article 94(1) of the Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of the right to be heard pursuant to article 94(1) of the Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
AGREEMENT  FOR  DEFERRAL  OF  1998  ANNUAL  CASH  BONUS

     Ralston  Purina  Company  ("Company")  and  ________________  agree  that,
effective  November  1,  1998,  $          awarded to Participant under the 1998
                                ---------
Annual  Cash Bonus Award Program shall be deferred, as requested by Participant,
into  the  option  or options available under the Deferred Compensation Plan for
Key  Employees  ("Plan"), which is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated
by  reference  herein.

     Pursuant to Participant's request, the following amounts have been deferred
for  Participant  in  the  manner  set  forth  below:

     (1)          EQUITY  OPTION  -
                  -----------------

          (a)          $          in  a  Deferred  Stock  Equivalent  Account in
                       ---------
Participant's  name  under  the Equity Option as set forth in Section 2.2 of the
Plan.

          (b)          $          in  a  Deferred    Stock Equivalent Account in
                       ---------
Participant's  name representing Company Matching Deferral (25% of amount listed
in  1(a)  above)  as  set  forth  in  Section  2.2(b)  of  the  Plan.


(2)              SHORT-TERM VARIABLE INTEREST OPTION - $      in a Deferred Cash
                 -----------------------------------   -------
Account in Participant's name under the Variable Interest Option as set forth in
Section  2.3 of the Plan; provided, however, that, notwithstanding any provision
to  the  contrary  contained in the Plan, amounts attributable to deferrals into
the  Short-Term Variable Interest Option shall be paid to Participant in January
1999.


(3)              LONG-TERM VARIABLE INTEREST OPTION - $       in a Deferred Cash
                 ----------------------------------   --------
Account in Participant's name under the Variable Interest Option as set forth in
Section  2.3  of  the  Plan.
     Participant's  deferral hereunder is pursuant to the Plan and is subject in
all  respects to the terms and conditions of this Agreement and of the Plan.  No
other  communications  or  representations,  written  or  oral,  made  prior  or
subsequent  to  this  Agreement  shall be deemed to amend or modify the terms of
this  deferral  except  by  an  agreement  in  writing  executed  by the parties
subsequent to the date of this Agreement, expressly consenting to such amendment
or  modification.    Participant  hereby waives any rights, and releases Company
from  any  claim,  based on any such prior communications or representations, if
any.

ACCEPTED:                                   RALSTON  PURINA  COMPANY



------------------------------              By:
          Participant                          --------------------------------
                                               C.  S.  Sommer
                                               Vice  President  and
                                               Director,  Administration
------------------------------
         Date
#### COM. v. ADDISON, R.

192 WDA 2017

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/11/2017

CP-02-CR-0013549-2003 (Allegheny)

Affirmed
# C_2022424EN.01002302.xml

| 7.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 424/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 424/23

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 22 July 2022 — Association interprofessionnelle des fruits et légumes frais (Interfel) v Ministère de l’Agriculture et de la Souveraineté alimentaire

(Case C-502/22)

(2022/C 424/29)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Conseil d’État

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Association interprofessionnelle des fruits et légumes frais (Interfel)

Defendant: Ministère de l’Agriculture et de la Souveraineté alimentaire

Questions referred

| 1. | Is Article 164 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (1) to be interpreted as authorising the extension of inter-trade agreements which establish more stringent standards than those laid down in Union rules not only in the case of ‘production rules’, mentioned in point (b) of Article 164(4), but also in all of the other cases, mentioned in points (a) and (c) to (n) thereof, in relation to which Article 164 provides that the extension of an inter-trade agreement may be requested? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is Article 164 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (1) to be interpreted as authorising the extension of inter-trade agreements which establish more stringent standards than those laid down in Union rules not only in the case of ‘production rules’, mentioned in point (b) of Article 164(4), but also in all of the other cases, mentioned in points (a) and (c) to (n) thereof, in relation to which Article 164 provides that the extension of an inter-trade agreement may be requested?

| 2. | Where there are no specific Union rules relating to a given class of fruit or vegetables, is Article 164 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 to be interpreted as authorising the extension of inter-trade agreements which establish more stringent standards than the applicable standards adopted by the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe to which EU law refers? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Where there are no specific Union rules relating to a given class of fruit or vegetables, is Article 164 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 to be interpreted as authorising the extension of inter-trade agreements which establish more stringent standards than the applicable standards adopted by the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe to which EU law refers?

---

(1)  OJ 2013 L 347, p. 671.

---
#### WEEKS, M. v. G & E REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT SERVICES

2355 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/28/2017

Reargument Denied 12/7/2017

1957 July Term, 2014

(Philadelphia)

Affirmed
(logo) Rialto

CAPITAL

 

 

**2018 Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance (Item1123)**

 

 

Pooling and ServicingAgreement (the "Pooling and Servicing Agreement") dated as of March1, 2015 by and among Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc., asDepositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Master Servicer, RialtoCapital Advisors, LLC as Special Servicer, TriMont Real Estate Advisors, Inc.as Trust Advisor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as CertificateAdministrator, as Tax Administrator and as Custodian, Wilmington Trust,National Association as Trustee relating to the Wells Fargo Commercial MortgageTrust 2015-C27, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-C27 **(WFCM2015-C27)**

 

The undersigned, a dulyauthorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer (the"Special Servicer")hereincertifies to the following:

 

1.       All servicing activities and performanceof such servicing activities under the Pooling and ServicingAgreement are performed on behalf of the SpecialServicer.

 

2.       A review of the servicing activities andperformance by the Special Servicer for the period of January 1, 2018to December 31, 2018 (the"Reporting Period")in accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement hasbeen conducted under my supervision.

 

3.       To the best of my knowledge, based on suchreview, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligationsunder the terms of the Pooling andServicing Agreement,in all material respects for the Reporting Periodand if there has been a failure to fulfill any suchobligations in any material respect, each failure and thenature and status thereof has been specificallyidentified herein.

 

 

Certified by: /s/ Adam Singer

Adam Singer, ManagingDirector 

 

Date: March 1, 2019
# C_2023235EN.01007701.xml

| 3.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 235/77 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 235/77

---

Order of the General Court of 16 May 2023 — Diesel v EUIPO — Lidl Stiftung (Joggjeans)

(Case T-378/22) (1)

(2023/C 235/92)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 311, 16.8.2022.

---
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATION
of
Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended I, Daniel P. Penberthy, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Rand Capital Corporation and
subsidiaries.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this annual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this annual report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors
and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. Dated: March 28, 2005/s/ Daniel P. PenberthyDaniel P. Penberthy, Treasurer(Principal Financial Officer of Rand CapitalCorporation and equivalent of PrincipalFinancial Officer of Rand Capital SBIC, L.P.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-27-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-28-1996
<CASH>                                              27
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,092
<ALLOWANCES>                                       608
<INVENTORY>                                     20,185
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                34,307
<PP&E>                                          44,873
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,383
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  85,669
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,731
<BONDS>                                          2,973
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             9
<OTHER-SE>                                      48,069
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    85,669
<SALES>                                         22,035
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,035
<CGS>                                           15,984
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,984
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,074
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 420
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,587
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,047
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,540
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,540
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .18
        

</TABLE>
exh1039.htm


EXHIBIT 10.39


 


LEASE EXTENSION AGREEMENT


 


This extension made this date, February 26, 2013, by and between Annette Kaufman and Michael Mirsky co-trustees Annette Kaufman Survivor Trust as Lessor, and Touchpoint Metrics, Inc., a California Corporation as Lessee:


 


The parties have previously entered into a lease (dated July 18, 2010) regarding the premises located at 251 Sir Francis Drake Blvd., San Anselmo, CA. The term of that lease shall expire on August 31, 2013.


 


 The term of the lease shall extend as follows:


 


1. The lease shall be extended for three years ending August 31, 2016.


 


2. Rent shall be $2,044.00 per month beginning September 1, 2013.


    Rent shall be $2,095.10 per month beginning September 1, 2014.


    Rent shall be $2,146.20 per month beginning September 1, 2015.


 


3. The option to renew the lease for three years must be exercised no later than March 1, 2016.


 


 4. Painting of all interior common area walls and doors and cleaning of carpets will be completed not later than June 1, 2013. Lessor will pay to Lessee $350 per month beginning June 1, 2013 if the painting of the hallway walls and doors is not complete.


 


5. Upon execution hereof, the Lease Extension Agreement, this addendum shall become an integral part of the lease. All other terms and provisions of the lease shall remain in full force.


 


 


 



	 Lessor:	 	 	Lessee:	 
	 	 MICHAEL MIRSKY	 	 	 MICHAEL HINSHAW
	 	 Michael Mirsky 	 	 	 Michael Hinshaw
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 President, Touchpoint Metrics, Inc.
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 Date:  3/28/13	 	 	Date:  2/26/13
(logo) BERKADIA®

 

 

 

Annual Statement as to Compliance

For the Year Ended December 31, 2023 (the “ReportingPeriod”)

 

*Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation,*

*Series 2015-DC1*

 

 

Pursuant to Section 10.11 ofthe Pooling and Servicing Agreement governing the referenced transaction (the“Servicing Agreement”), I hereby attest that:

 

i.                    A review of the activities and performanceof Berkadia as Subservicer during the Reporting Period, has been made under mysupervision.

 

ii.                  To the best of my knowledge, based on suchreview, Berkadia as Subservicer has fulfilled, in all material respects, itsobligations under this Subservicing Agreement throughout the Reporting Periodand no default by the Subservicer under the Subservicing Agreement has occurredand is continuing.

 

 

Berkadia Commercial MortgageLLC,

 

 

 

/s/ Mark E. McCool

Mark E. McCool

President

February 10, 2024
#### COM. v. MCELLIGOTT, D.

613 MDA 2017

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/26/2017

CP-67-CR-0002729-2016 (York)

Affirmed
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23(i)


                         CONSENT OF RYDER SCOTT COMPANY


To the Board of Directors of Forman Petroleum Corporation:

     We hereby consent to the use of our report dated March 10, 1997 (the
"Report") entitled "Estimated Future Reserves and Income Attributable to Certain
Leasehold and Royalty Interests Owned by Forman Petroleum Corporaiton as of
January 1, 1997" and of the estimates of net proved oil and natural gas reserves
of Forman Petroleum Corporation, and their present values, as of January 1, 1997
in this Form S-4 Registration Statement and the prospectus incorporated therein,
and all references to our firm therein, subject to the conditions in the text of
the "Report".



                              RYDER SCOTT COMPANY
                              PETROLEUM ENGINEERS


    
Houston, Texas
September 11, 1997
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0583

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

TAYLOR JAY DAMM,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including June 12, 2024, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 6 2024

05/06/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0583
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3

                       Consent of Independent Accountants


     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Amendment No. 6
to Registration Statement on Form S-4 of our report dated April 16, 2002, except
as to Notes 21 and 22 to the consolidated financial statements, which are as of
November 18, 2002, relating to the consolidated financial statements and
financial statement schedule of Hanover Compressor Company, which appears in
Hanover Compressor Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K/A-2 for the year ended
December 31, 2001. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading
"Experts" in such Registration Statement.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Houston, Texas
February 11, 2003
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

LINDA DAVANZO and ANDREW DAVANZO

, Appellant s

,

v.

BANKUNITED, N.A

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 3521

[ November 27, 2019 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm

Beach County ; Cymonie S. Rowe , Judge; L.T. Case No. 502014CA013646

.

Linda Davanzo and Andrew Davanzo, Boca Raton, pro se.

Christopher J. Hoertz and Gary M. Singer of Law Firm of Gary M.

Singer, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

L EVINE

, C.J., M AY

, J., and P HILLIPS

, C AROL

- L ISA , Associate Judge, concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### LaKeith L. MCCOY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J. RAMIREZ, Correctional Officer at CCI; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-16268

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted February 13, 2018 *

Filed February 23, 2018

LaKeith L. McCoy, Pro Se

Matthew Roman, Attorney, AGCA-Of-fice of the • California Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, John Randall Andrada, Esquire, Attorney, Andrada & Associates, Professional Corporation, Oakland, CA, for Defendant-Appellee

Before: LEAVY, FERNANDEZ, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App, P. 34(a)(2).

*658MEMORANDUM **

California state prisoner LaKeith L. McCoy appeals pro se from the magistrate judge’s orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging excessive force and due process claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo whether the magistrate judge validly entered judgment on behalf of the district court. *Allen v. Meyer,*755 F.3d 866, 867-68 (9th Cir. 2014). We vacate and remand.

McCoy and defendant Ramirez consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. *See*28 U.S.C. § 636(c). The magistrate judge, however, screened and dismissed claims against other named defendants in the action before those defendants had been served. *See*28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), 1915A. Because ah parties, including unserved defendants, must consent to proceed before the magistrate judge for jurisdiction to vest, *Williams v. King,*875 F.3d 500, 503-04 (9th Cir. 2017), we vacate the magistrate judge’s orders and remand for further proceedings.

VACATED and REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.