alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### SERVED: 

## JUNE 19 2012 ' U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF 

### BUTTE STEEL & 

### FABRICATION,INC. FAA DOCKETNO. [TO BEASSIGNED] (CivilPenalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA-2012- 0199 

### NOTICE OF HEARING DATES NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that testimony and evidence will be heard and considered on

### July 12 and 13,2012, inclusive, inthe 

### U.S. Tax Court: Room 2-1350, Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse,450 Golden GateAvenue, San Francisco, CA 94102. Hearings will commence at 9:00 a.m. and conclude at 4:30p.m. each day. The parties should vacate the courthouse on orbefore 5:00p.m. each day. 

### Settled cases will 

### not be removed from the docket until theJudge receives the properpleading(s). Pleadings may be forwarded byfax, express mail, courier or postal service.

Attachment

- Service List · ,,_

1SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL 

### & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 WilburWright Building-Suite 2W1000 1

Butte Steel & Fabrication, Inc. Attn: JeffBrochheuser, President 13290 Contractors Drive Chico, CA 95973 TEL: 530-893-1113 FAX: 530-893-3014 ONE COPY

Christopher Merrill, 

### Complainant's Counsel Attorney, Office ofRegional Counsel Western-Pacific Region, AWP-7.3 Federal Aviation Administration P.O. Box 92007 Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 TEL: 310-725-7105 FAX: 310-725-6816 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,

### AdministrativeLaw Judge Office ofHearings,**M~20** · U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E.(E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant· FAX: 202-366-7536 FDMS No. FAA-2012-0199 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the followingaddress: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. ·.., 

### -2-
#### Florida Industrial Co. v. State, for its Own Use and for the Use and Benefit of Lafayette County.

152 So. 717.

Opinion Filed February 7, 1934.

*Treadwell & Treadwell,*for Appellant;

*McKinney & Edwards,*for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

— The appeal here is from an order overruling a motion to dismiss bill of complaint filed' to foreclose certain tax sale certificates.

By motion to dismiss, the validity of certain provisions of Chapter 14572, Acts of 1929, are challenged. The manner of procedure employed and the pr.ayer for a personal decree are also challenged.

Of course, no personal decree can be entered against the landowner in such case; that is, no deficiency decree is allowable, although a decree may be entered requiring the payment of taxes, interest penalties and costs, in default of *2payment of which the lien therefor will be foreclosed and the title conveyed to another.

Other questions presented have been determined by this Court adversely to appellant’s contentions in the case of Beebe v. State, for the use of the State, *et al.,*opinion filed November 28th, 1933, and reported 151 So. 298.

The order appealed from should, therefore, be affirmed.

It is so ordered.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Ellis and Brown, J. J., not participating.
(logo)**Prudential**

**PrudentialAsset Resources**

PGIMReal Estate Finance

2100Ross Avenue, Suite 2500, Dallas TX 75201

Tel214-777-4500

 

Abusiness of Prudential Financial, Inc.

 

WellsFargo Bank, National Association

CommercialMortgage Servicing

MACD1086

550South Tryon Street, 14th Floor

Charlotte,North Carolina 28202

Attention:Asset Manager

 

 

RE:         **WFCM 2015-C27**

Period: **January 1, 2018 to June 30,2018(the "Reporting Period")**

 

 

**Annual ComplianceStatement**

 

I, Joni Brown-Haas, in my capacity asPresident and Managing Director of Prudential Asset Resources, Inc. (the"Company") hereby certify with regard to the Company's role asSub-Servicer under the Sub-Servicing Agreement, (the "Agreement")dated as of March 1, 2015, pertaining to the above-referenced certificates,that:

 

       (i)           areview of the activities of the Company under the Agreement  during theperiod noted above, and  of the performance of the Company under theAgreement during the  relevant  period  has been made under mysupervision, and

 

     (ii)           to thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Company has fulfilled all itsobligations under the Agreement throughout the relevant period, and

 

   (iii)           to thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Company has fulfilled itsobligations under its sub-servicing agreement in all material respects, and

 

    (iv)           theCompany has maintained an effective internal control system over the servicingof mortgage loans including the Loans serviced by the Company, and

 

     (v)           theCompany has not received any notice regarding qualification or challenging thestatus of the Lower Tier REMIC or the Upper Tier REMIC as a REMIC, from the IRSor any other governmental agency or body.

 

Effectiveas of February 22, 2019

 

 

/s/Joni Brown-Haas

JoniBrown-Haas

Presidentand Managing Director

PrudentialAsset Resources, Inc.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
  We consent to the inclusion in this Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File
No.      ) of our report dated November 26, 1997 except as to Note 12, for
which the date is December 17, 1997, on our audits of the consolidated
financial statements and financial statement schedule of Red Man Pipe and
Supply Co. and Subsidiaries. We also consent to the reference to our firm
under the caption "EXPERTS."
 
                                          Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.
 
Tulsa, Oklahoma
December 17, 1997
August 7, 2012

No. 12-5349 (12A128).

#### Wilson *v.*Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

C. A. 5th Cir. Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to Justice Scalia, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-10271.

#### Kidd *v.*Norman, Warden.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William L. WALLIS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-1736

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: February 28, 2018

Decided: March 7, 2018

Gary M. Bowman, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellant. Rick A. Mountcastle, Acting United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia; David A. Hubbert, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Teresa E. McLaughlin, Robert J. Branman, Tax Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William L. Wallis appeals the district court’s orders granting partial summary judgment in favor of the Government on its complaint for unpaid individual and trust fund taxes for Wallis and three companies in which he was involved, adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and issuing final judgment in the amounts requested by the Government, and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *United States v. Wallis,*No. 6:14-cv-00005-NKM-RSB, 2016 WL 411020, 2017 WL 933150 (W.D. Va. Feb. 1, 2016; Mar. 8, 2017; May 16, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
# C_2022165EN.01002701.xml

| 19.4.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 165/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.4.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 165/27

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD) (Portugal) lodged on 10 January 2022 — Caxamar — Comércio e Indústria de Bacalhau SA v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira

(Case C-23/22)

(2022/C 165/35)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Caxamar — Comércio e Indústria de Bacalhau SA

Defendant: Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira

Question referred

According to the correct interpretation of the Guidelines on regional State aid for 2014-2020, in conjunction with the provisions of Commission Regulation (EU) No 651/2014 of 16 June 2014, (1) in particular Article 1 and Article 2(11) thereof, Regulation (EU) No 1379/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013, (2) and Annex I to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, is it possible to conclude that, under Articles 2(2) and 22(1) of the Código Fiscal do Investimento (Tax Code on Investment), approved by Decreto-Lei n.o 162/2014 (Decree-Law No 162/2014) of 31 October 2014, and Articles 1 and 2 of the Portaria n.o 282/2014 (Ministerial Order No 282/2014) of 30 December 2014, the processing of fishery and aquaculture products relating to ‘salted cod’, ‘frozen cod’ and ‘desalted cod’ in Economic Activity Code 10204Rev3 does not constitute the processing of agricultural products for the purposes of granting the relevant tax advantages?

---

(1)  Commission Regulation (EU) No 651/2014 of 17 June 2014 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the internal market in application of Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty (OJ 2014 L 187, p. 1).

(2)  Regulation (EU) No 1379/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 on the common organisation of the markets in fishery and aquaculture products, amending Council Regulations (EC) No 1184/2006 and (EC) No 1224/2009 and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 104/2000 (OJ 2013 L 354, p. 1).

---
# C_2021088EN.01004401.xml

| 15.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 88/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 88/44

---

Action brought on 1 February 2021 — Precisis v EUIPO — Easee (EASEE)

(Case T-66/21)

(2021/C 88/58)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Precisis AG (Heidelberg, Germany) (represented by: I. Fowler and C. Stöber, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Easee BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark EASEE — Application for registration No 15 514 706

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 November 2020 in Case R 2948/2019-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order that the costs of the proceedings be borne by the defendant and the other party before the Board of Appeal in the event that it intervenes in the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order that the costs of the proceedings be borne by the defendant and the other party before the Board of Appeal in the event that it intervenes in the proceedings.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
# June 2, 2016

Mr. Abel Acosta

Clerk, Court of Criminal Appeals

P. O. Box 12308

Austin, TX 78711

RE: Case No. AP -77,041

Trial Court Case No. 2012-434,109

Style: Brian Suniga

v.

The State of Texas

Dear Mr. Acosta:

The undersigned attorney acknowledges receipt of the Court’s

May 23, 2016, letter in the above cause, inquiring as to whether the

parties will appear for oral argument. In response to the Court’s

inquiry, the undersigned attorney hereby gives notice of intent to

appear at the June 15, 2016, oral argument on behalf of the State of

Texas. The State hereby designates the first, second, and fourth issues

as issues that it intends to argue, time permitting, at the oral argument.

Thank you for your courtesies.

Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ Jeffrey S. Ford Jeffrey S. Ford

Jeffrey S. Ford

Assistant Criminal District Attorney

Appellate Chief

copy: Ms. Hilary Sheard

Law Office of Hilary Sheard

7421 Burnet Road #300-512

Austin, TX 78757 Administrator

Anthony Holcomb

First Assistant District Attorney

Wade Jackson

Chief Investigator

Todd Smith

Appellate Division

Jeffrey Ford

- Chief

Lauren Murphree

Grand Jury/Intake Division

Trey Hill

- Deputy D.A.

Eddie Wharf

Victim Assistance Coord inator

. Laney Dickey

Juvenile Division

Kim Hayes

- Chief

Jeri Leigh Myers

Civil Division

Neal Burt

- Chief

Donna Clarke

Morgan Vaughan

Deirdre W a rd

- CPS

Theresa Ratliff

- CPS

Kacee Harvey

- CPS

Felony Prosecutors

Sunshine Stanek

- Deputy DA

Barron Slack

- Assistant F elony DA

Narcotics/Property Crimes

Mandi Say

Intoxication Cases/Misd Chief

Tom Brummett

137 th District Court

Laura Beth Fossett

- Chief

Ashley Davis

Chris Schulte

140 th District Court

Traci Bowman

- Chief

Jessica Schneider

Neal Spradlin

364 th District Court

Aaron Mon cibaiz

- Chief

Courtney Grafft

Cara Landers

County Court at Law #1

Ryan Brooke

- Chief

Greg Jerman

Cassie Nesbitt

County Court at Law #2

Ginny Shewmake

- Chief

Craig Oglesby

Domestic Violence

Jennifer Slack 

## Office of the Criminal District Attorney 

# MATTHEW D. POWELL

CRIMINAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY

P.O. BOX 10536

LUBBOCK, TEXAS 79408

- 3536 

## Lubbock County Courthouse

904 Broadway

Second Floor

Lubbock, Texas 79401

(806)775

- 1100 Fax (806) 775

- 7930 

# AP-77,041

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 6/2/2016 10:19:14 PM

Accepted 6/3/2016 7:30:54 AM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK
* Local rule 47.5 provides: “The publication of opinions that have no precedential value

and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settle d principles of law imposes

needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession.” Pursuant to that Rule, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-40696 Summary Calendar

GEORGE FRACIS VERTZ, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

MICHAEL WARREN, Dr.; J. DAVID

FAGAN, Dr.; DANIEL SALTZSTEN, Dr.;

JOHN SEALY HOSPITAL, Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Southern District of Texas
(G-91-CV-320)

December 1, 1995

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, JOLLY and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

George Fracis Vertz appeals the district court’s 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) dismissal of his

civil rights suit. Vertz alleged that he underwent surgery to correct a preoperative

condition, that the surgery was unsuccessful, that he now suffers f rom additional

postoperative complications, and that the defendants refused to provide available, corrective

surgery. Vertz alleged that during the surgery the defendants deliberately performed an2

experimental pro cedure without his consent. Vertz also alleged that the magistrate judge

recommended dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 1983 action in retaliation for his filing a petition

for writ of mandamus.

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s dismissal of Vertz’s section 1983 action

as frivolous under section 1915(d). Vertz’s request for appointment of counsel is DENIED.

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8518 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8518

To amend the Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act to provide for a 
   lifetime National Recreational Pass for law enforcement officers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 2, 2020

  Mr. McClintock (for himself and Mr. Gosar) introduced the following 
bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in 
     addition to the Committee on Agriculture, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act to provide for a 
   lifetime National Recreational Pass for law enforcement officers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Law Enforcement Officer Recreation 
Pass Act''.

SEC. 2. NATIONAL RECREATIONAL PASSES FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS.

    Section 805(b) of the Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act (16 
U.S.C. 6804(b)) is amended by inserting after paragraph (2) the 
following:
            ``(3) Law enforcement officer discount.--The Secretary 
        shall make the National Parks and Federal Recreational Lands 
        Pass available, without charge and for the lifetime of the 
        passholder, to any law enforcement officer. For the purposes of 
        this paragraph, the term `law enforcement officer' means any 
        officer, agent, or employee of the Federal Government, a State, 
        a unit of local government, or an Indian Tribe, authorized by 
        law or by a government agency to engage in or supervise the 
        prevention, detection, or investigation of any violation of 
        criminal law, or authorized by law to supervise sentenced 
        criminal offenders.''.
                                 <all>
```
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida 

Opinion filed March 6, 2024.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D22-0982

Lower Tribunal No. 19-37471

________________

Harvey Ross,

Appellant,

vs.

Citizens Property Insurance Corporation,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, David C. 

Miller, Judge.

Nwahiri Law, PLLC and Tobechuku Tony Nwahiri, for appellant.

Williams, Leininger & Cosby, PA, and Carri S. Leininger and Maureen 

Martinez (N. Palm Beach), for appellee.

Before LOGUE, C.J., and FERNANDEZ and LOBREE, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Rich v. Narog, 366 So. 3d 1111, 1117–18 (Fla. 3d DCA 
2

2022) (explaining Florida’s “new” summary judgment standard and stating 

that “[i]n Florida it will no longer be plausible to maintain that ‘the existence 

of any competent evidence creating an issue of fact, however credible or

incredible, substantial or trivial, stops the inquiry and precludes summary 

judgment, so long as the ‘slightest doubt’ is raised.’” (quoting In re 

Amendments to Fla. Rule of Civil Procedure 1.510, 317 So. 3d 72, 76 (Fla. 

2021))); Id. at 1118 (stating that “where . . . the nonmoving party bears the 

burden of proof on a dispositive issue at trial, the moving party need only 

demonstrate ‘that there is an absence of evidence to support the nonmoving 

party’s case’” (footnote omitted) (citing Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 

317, 325 (1986))); Chowdhury v. BankUnited, N.A., 366 So. 3d 1130, 1133

n.2 (Fla. 3d DCA 2023).
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mayor's Jewelers, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the thirteen weeks ended June 28, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Thomas A. Andruskevich, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



Date: August 7, 2003


/s/ Thomas A. Andruskevich
------------------------------------------------------------
Thomas A. Andruskevich
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
#### IN the INTEREST OF: L.C., Minor

518 EDA 2017

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/27/2017

CP-51-DP-0001912-2014

(Philadelphia)

*200Affirmed — Application to Withdraw as Counsel Granted
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT (12)

                             AMERICOLD CORPORATION

                RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES COMPUTATIONS

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
                                                                             Nine         Nine
                                                                            Months       Months
                                                                            Ended        Ended
                       February  February  February  February   February   Nov. 30,     Nov. 30,
                         1991      1992      1993     1994        1995       1994         1995
                       --------  --------  --------  --------   --------  -----------  -----------
                                                                          (Unaudited)  (Unaudited)
<S>                    <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>        <C>       <C>          <C> 
PRE-TAX EARNINGS
 (LOSS) BEFORE
 EXTRAORDINARY ITEM
 AND ACCOUNTING
 CHARGES               $(5,942)    $ (85)  $(5,695)  $(12,222)  $10,791     $12,979     $(8,492)

CAPITALIZED
 INTEREST              $     0     $  63   $     4   $     61   $   158     $    79     $   504   

FIXED CHARGE RATIO           -         -         -          -      1.19        1.30           -

EARNINGS INSUFFICIENT
 TO COVER
 FIXED CHARGES         $(5,942)    $(148)  $(5,699)  $(12,283)        -           -     $(8,996)
</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON

STATE OF OREGON, ) Marion County Circuit Court ) Case no. 94C20467 Plaintiff-Appellant, ) Respondent on Review, ) ) v. ) SC S46714 ) CA A95499 HECTOR VASQUEZ-HERNANDEZ, ) ) Defendant-Respondent, ) ORDER AFFIRMING BY AN Petitioner on Review. ) EQUALLY DIVIDED COURT

Upon consideration by the court.
The decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed by an equally divided court.
Dated this 23rd day of June 2003.

WALLACE P. CARSON, JR. CHIEF JUSTICE

Van Hoomissen, J., retired December 31, 2000, and did not participate in the decision of this case; Kulongoski, J., resigned June 14, 2001, and did not participate in the decision of this case; Leeson, J., resigned January 31, 2003, and did not participate in the decision of this case; De Muniz and Balmer, JJ., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
Order entered December 12, 2019

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 19

- 01410

- CV

IN RE KEVIN NEAL GLA SPIE, R elat or

O rigi nal Proceeding from the 203rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F18

- 57718

- P



### O RDER

Before Justices Myers, Molberg, and Nowell

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this original proceeding for want

of jurisdiction.

/s/ LANA MYERS

JUSTICE
No. 11-10327.

#### Berry *v.*Tennessee.

Ct. Crim. App. Tenn. Certiorari denied.