alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 41 (Monday, March 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 9418]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5127]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board, Paducah

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Public Law 92-463, 86 Stat. 770) notice is hereby given of the 
following Advisory Committee meeting: Environmental Management Site-
Specific Advisory Board (EM SSAB), Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant.

DATES: Thursday, March 20, 6:00 p.m.-9:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: West Kentucky Technical School (cafeteria), 5200 Blandville 
Road, Paducah, Kentucky.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carlos Alvarado, Site-Specific 
Advisory Board Coordinator, Department of Energy Paducah Site Office, 
Post Office Box 1410, MS-103, Paducah, Kentucky 42001, (502) 441-6804.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    Purpose of the Board: The purpose of the Board is to make 
recommendations to DOE and its regulators in the areas of environmental 
restoration, waste management, and related activities.
    Tentative Agenda: Updates on the Federal Facility Agreement, the 
membership drive, a Financial Committee Report, a Background on the 
Process of Documents, the Proposed Budget, and the 10-Year Plan.
    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. Written 
statements may be filed with the Committee either before or after the 
meeting. Individuals who wish to make oral statements pertaining to 
agenda items should contact Carlos Alvarado at the address or telephone 
number listed above. Requests must be received 5 days prior to the 
meeting and reasonable provision will be made to include the 
presentation in the agenda. The Designated Federal Official is 
empowered to conduct the meeting in a fashion that will facilitate the 
orderly conduct of business. Each individual wishing to make public 
comment will be provided a maximum of 5 minutes to present their 
comments.
    Minutes: The minutes of this meeting will be available for public 
review and copying at the Freedom of Information Public Reading Room, 
1E-190, Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, 
DC 20585 between 9:00 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday-Friday, except Federal 
holidays. Minutes will also be available at the Department of Energy's 
Environmental Information and Reading Room at 175 Freedom Boulevard, 
Highway 60, Kevil, Kentucky between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. on Monday 
through Friday, or by writing to Carlos Alvarado, Department of Energy 
Paducah Site Office, Post Office Box 1410, MS-103, Paducah, Kentucky 
42001, or by calling him at (502) 441-6804.

    Issued at Washington, DC on February 26, 1997.
Rachel M. Samuel,
Acting Deputy Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-5127 Filed 2-28-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
# C_2022119EN.01002801.xml

| 14.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 119/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 119/28

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Roma (Italy) lodged on 5 January 2022 — Liberi editori e autori (LEA) v Jamendo SA

(Case C-10/22)

(2022/C 119/36)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale ordinario di Roma

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Liberi editori e autori (LEA)

Defendant: Jamendo SA

Question referred

Must Directive 2014/26/EU (1) be interpreted as precluding national legislation that reserves access to the copyright intermediation market, or in any event the granting of licences to users, solely to entities which can be classified, according to the definition in that directive, as collective management organisations, to the exclusion of those which can be classified as independent management entities incorporated in that Member State or in other Member States?

---

(1)  Directive 2014/26/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on collective management of copyright and related rights and multi-territorial licensing of rights in musical works for online use in the internal market (OJ 2014 L 84, p. 72).

---
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">NYCHA Public Housing Preservation I, LLC, Petitioner-Landlord-Respondent, <br><br>against<br><br>Stephanie Resto, Respondent-Tenant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Tenant appeals from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Bronx County, (Elizabeth J. Yalin Tao, J.), dated August 20, 2015, which denied her motion to compel landlord to furnish a supplemental bill of particulars in a holdover summary proceeding.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Order (Elizabeth J. Yalin Tao, J.), dated August 20, 2015, modified by directing landlord to furnish a further bill of particulars in response to items 1 and 2 of the demand within 30 days after service of a copy of this order with notice of entry; as modified, order affirmed, without costs.</p><p>Inasmuch as landlord's counsel provided less than unequivocal responses at oral argument to questions relating to the scope of the alleged illegal activities to be proven at trial, landlord is directed to furnish a further bill of particulars responsive to items 1 and 2 of the demand. The remaining items of the demand were either furnished or sought evidentiary matter not within the scope of a bill or particulars (<i>see Colwin v Katz</i>, 90 AD3d 516, 516-517 [2011]).</p><p>Since landlord conceded at oral argument that service of the notice of appeal was timely, the one day delay in the filing of the notice is excused (<i>see</i> CPLR 5520[a]; <i>Messner v Messner</i>, 42 AD2d 889 [1973]).</p><br>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.<br>I concur I concur <br>Decision Date: January 25, 2017<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Petition for exemption/rulemaking

I am the airport board chairman for DuPont-Lapeer Airport (D95) owned by 

Mayfield Township, Lapeer County, Michigan. I am requesting to operate 

an unmanned aircraft system (UAS) DJI Phantom 3 Advanced N95QC for 

the research and development for wildlife management on airports and 

aerial inspection of airport property and structures. This would include 

having a handheld comm radio to monitor ground and air movement of 

aircraft so the UAS would be recalled to limit any conflict with aircraft. The 

UAS would be limited to only 50’agl above the tallest airport structure or 

less than 400’agl.

I would also like to conduct training of persons individually or belonging to 

both private and or public organizations that have interest in the use and 

application of a UAS. The purpose of this training is for safe operation of a 

UAS and to enhance the safety of the national airspace system (NAS) as 

well as for the protection of persons and property. This training would 

include aerial inspection of residential and/or commercial structures under 

contract with the owners or local government authority, aerial photography 

and/or video for public and/or private use including real estate, architecture, 

land surveying, engineering and other related professional activities, aerial

video/photography or providing live video feed to assist with search and 

rescue operations in cases of an emergency or natural disaster when the 

local authorities or government have requested it.

Frank W Thorman

B.S. in Education

Private Pilot 3384512

Repairman Experimental Aircraft Builder 3011848

Thor Products LLC

2022 Haines Rd

Lapeer, MI, 48446
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2
 
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
  We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" and to
the use of our reports dated March 6, 1995, with respect to the financial
statements of Kelly Oil and Gas Corporation and Kelly Oil & Gas Partners, Ltd.
(a Texas limited partnership) included in the Registration Statement (Form S-4)
and related Prospectus of Kelly Oil & Gas Corporation for the registration
dated December 20, 1996.
 
                                          /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
 
Houston, Texas
December 20, 1996
<Page>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 32c

        Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18
                            of the United States Code

     I, E. James Ferland, Chief Executive Officer of Public Service Electric and
Gas Company, to the best of my knowledge, certify that (i) the Annual Report of
Public Service Electric and Gas Company on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2003 (the "Periodic Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information
contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Public Service Electric and Gas
Company.


                                     /s/ E. James Ferland
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     E. James Ferland
                                     Public Service Electric and Gas Company
                                     Chief Executive Officer
                                     February 25, 2004
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

September 3, 2020

No

. 04

- 18

- 00498

- CV

MWM HELOTES RANCH, LTD . and Myfe Moore, Appellants

v. John H

. WHITE Jr., Individually; John H. White III, Individually; John H. White Jr., John H.

White III, and Molly C. White, in their capacities as Co

- Trustees of the 1983 John H. White Long

- Term Trust F/B/O John H. White Jr., and of the 1976B Partnership Trust; TCW Helotes Ranch Ltd; and Tuleta White, Appellees

From the 73rd Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2018CI11563
Honorable David A. Canales , Judge Presi ding



### ORDER

On August 20, 2020, appellees filed a motion to amend the judgment to render judgment against the surety in this case

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 43.5 . The motion recites that appellants oppose the requested relief. Because we affirmed the trial court’s judgment, t he rendition of judgment against the surety on the appellants’ supersedeas bond is a mandatory, ministerial duty

that may be performed at a ny time, even after our plenary power has expired. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 43.5, 19.3 ; see also Whitmire v. Greenridge Place Apartments , 333 S.W.3d 255, 260

- 61 (Tex. App

. – Ho uston [1st Dist.] 2010, pet. dism’d) ( noting that rendering judgement against the sureties is a ministerial act involving no judicial discretion and thus the court of appeals may amend its judgment after its plenary power expires to operate against the sureties on the supersedeas bond ). Accor dingly, the appellees’ motion is GRANTED. An amended judgment holding the surety on appellants’ S upersedeas B ond No. 3462398 liable for the performance of the judgment and for any costs taxed against appellants to the extent of the bond amount will be

issued shortly, after which the mandate will be issued

.

_________________________________ Liz a A. Rodriguez , JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 3rd day of September, 2020

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-12-0000051 28-FEB-2012 02:44 PM

NO. SCPW-12-0000051
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ' I
RAQUEL A. DELLOSA, TARCILA J. DELA CRUZ, ANNALYN S. LAZARO, and IDA P. OANDASAN, Petitioners,

vs. THE HONORABLE GARY W.B. CHANG, JUDGE OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT, STATE OF HAWAI ' I and OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY, Respondents.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CIVIL NO. 09-1-1907-08)
ORDER (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy, and McKenna, JJ.) Upon consideration of petitioners Raquel A. Dellosa, Tarcila J. Dela Cruz, Annalyn S. Lazaro, and Ida P. Oandasan's petition for a writ of mandamus and the papers in support, it appears that: (1) the respondent judge's December 22, 2011 order compelling petitioners to submit to medical and psychological examinations is reviewable on appeal from a final judgment entered in Civil No. 09-1-1907-08 and (2) disallowing observation or recording of the examinations and disallowing discovery of the examiners' general income data are not extraordinary situationswarranting mandamus relief. Therefore, petitioners are not entitled to mandamus relief. See Kema v. Gaddis , 91 Hawai ' i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (A writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action. Such writs are not intended to supersede the legal discretionary authority of the trial courts, nor are they intended to serve as legal remedies in lieu of normal appellate procedures.); Brende v. Hara , 113 Hawai ' i 424, 429, 153 P.3d 1109, 1114 (2007) (Mandamus relief from discovery orders is "available for extraordinary situations."). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of mandamus is denied. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ' i, February 28, 2012. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ James E. Duffy, Jr. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

2
## Request for Extension of Time

Please see the attached request for extension of ti me from the Texas Pipeline Association on Technical White Papers on Potentially Significant S ources of Emissions in the Oil and Gas Sector. Thank you. Angie Adams Assistant to the President Texas Pipeline Association 512/478-2871 

### Pipeline Association <texaspipelineassociation@yaho o.com> Texas Thu 5/15/2014 12:14 PM To: OilandGas.Whitepapers <OilandGas.Whitepapers@epa.go v>;  1 attachment EPA extension req 5-15-14_0043.pdf; **Page 1**  **of 1**  **Request for Extension of Time -**  **OilandGas.Whitepapers**

**8/ 27/**  **2014 https://pod51045.outlook.com/owa/OilandGas.Whitepapers@epa.gov/**
#### FADEL v. DESERET FIRST CREDIT UNION

2017053

Supreme Court of Utah.

11-20-2017

20160070, 405 P.3d 807

Petition for Writ of Certiorari Denied.
ex10a.htm
















Exhibit 10(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 51 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-18419) pertaining to Lincoln National Variable Annuity Account H, which is incorporated by reference into Post-Effective Amendment No. 47 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-35784) and Amendment No. 350 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-05721), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) April 1, 2014, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) April 1, 2014, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln National Variable Annuity Account H for the registration of interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.


















/s/ Ernst & Young LLP












Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


April 1, 2014
EX-10.6(a)



 Exhibit 10.6(a) 
 June 1, 2013 
 Aspect Capital Ltd. 
 Nations House — 8th Floor 
 103 Wigmore Street 

London W1U 1QS, U.K. 
 Attention:
Mr. Anthony Todd, CEO 
 Re: Management Agreement Renewals 
 Dear Mr. Todd: 
 We are writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the
commodity pools to which reference is made below (the “Management Agreements”). We are extending the term of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2014 and all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged.

  

	 	•	 	 Global Diversified Futures Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 Diversified 2000 Futures Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 Tactical Diversified Futures Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 CMF Aspect Master Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 Institutional Futures Portfolio LP 


  

	 	•	 	 Global Futures Fund Ltd. 


 Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of Mr. Damian George at the address above or fax to 212-296-6868. If you have any
questions I can be reached at 212-296-1292. 
 Very truly yours, 

 

					
	 CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC
	 	
			
	By:	 	 /s/ Damian George
	 	
		 	 Damian George 
	 	
		 	Chief Financial Officer & Director	 	
			
	By:	 	 /s/ Kenneth Hope
	 	
		 	Print Name: Kenneth Hope	 	

 DG/sr
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7195

DAVID HOWELL,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

OFFICER C. L. BOOYER; CUMBERLAND COUNTY SHERIFF’S 

DEPARTMENT,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, 

Chief District Judge. (5:09-ct-03043-FL)

Submitted: March 17, 2011 Decided: April 1, 2011

Before MOTZ and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Howell, Appellant Pro Se. Ronnie Monroe Mitchell, 

MITCHELL, BREWER, RICHARDSON, ADAMS, BURGE & BOUGHMAN, 

Fayetteville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

David Howell appeals the district court’s order 

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Howell v. Booyer, No. 5:09-ct-03043-FL (E.D.N.C. 

Aug. 16, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8843 

To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to increase the number of acres 

authorized for enrollment in the conservation reserve program, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 3, 2020 

Mr. PETERSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to increase the 

number of acres authorized for enrollment in the conservation reserve program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INCREASE IN AUTHORIZED MAXIMUM ENROLL4 MENT IN CONSERVATION RESERVE. 

5 (a) GENERAL ENROLLMENT INCREASE.—Section 

6 1231(d)(1) of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 

7 3831(d)(1)(E)) is amended by striking subparagraphs (C) 

8 through (E) and inserting the following: 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8843 IH

1 ‘‘(C) fiscal year 2021, to the maximum ex2 tent practicable, not fewer than 28,000,000 

3 acres; 

4 ‘‘(D) fiscal year 2022, to the maximum ex5 tent practicable, not fewer than 32,000,000 

6 acres; 

7 ‘‘(E) fiscal year 2023, to the maximum ex8 tent practicable, not fewer than 37,000,000 

9 acres; 

10 ‘‘(F) fiscal year 2024, to the maximum ex11 tent practicable, not fewer than 43,000,000 

12 acres; and 

13 ‘‘(G) fiscal year 2025, to the maximum ex14 tent practicable, not fewer than 50,000,000 

15 acres.’’. 

16 (b) LIMITATION.—The amendment made by sub17 section (a) shall have no effect on the number of acres 

18 enrolled and maintained in the conservation reserve pro19 gram using the continuous enrollment procedure under 

20 section 1231(d)(6) of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 

21 U.S.C. 3831(d)(6)). 

22 (c) PRIORITY.—In holding a signup for general en23 rollment contracts for 25,000,000 acres of the total acres 

24 authorized to be enrolled in the conservation reserve pro25 gram under subparagraphs (C) through (G) of section 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 8843 IH

1 1231(d)(1) of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 

2 3831(d)(1)), the Secretary shall give priority to applica3 tions for the enrollment of land that would promote soil 

4 health and carbon sequestration, including applications for 

5 the enrollment of land on which deep-rooted perennials 

6 will be planted. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
# C_2023329EN.01000401.xml

| 18.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 329/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 329/4

---

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 June 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Szegedi Törvényszék — Hungary) — SOLE MiZO Zrt. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága

(Case C-426/22, (1) SOLE-MiZo)

(Request for a preliminary ruling - Common system of value added tax - Directive 2006/112/EC - Article 183 - Principles of fiscal effectiveness and fiscal neutrality - Deduction of input tax - Refund of excess - Calculation of interest due because of the unavailability of an excess of deductible VAT withheld in breach of EU law - Monetary depreciation)

(2023/C 329/05)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Szegedi Tovenzyk

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: SOLE-MiZo Zrt.

Defendant: Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága

Operative part

Article 183 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, and also the principles of fiscal effectiveness and fiscal neutrality,

must be interpreted as:

precluding the practice of a Member State consisting in calculating the interest on an excess of deductible value added tax (VAT) withheld by that Member State beyond a reasonable period in breach of EU law by applying a rate which corresponds to the national central bank’s base rate, plus two percentage points, where the interest on that excess VAT accrues during a period between the last date for lodging the return for a given month and that for lodging the return for the following month, without applying interest intended to compensate for the monetary depreciation caused by the passage of time, occurring after that period and running until a date which, first, is subsequent to the delivery of the judgment by which the Court held that there was that infringement of EU law and, second, is prior to the actual payment of the interest on that excess VAT, in so far as that practice is liable to deprive the taxable person of adequate compensation for the loss caused by the unavailability of the amounts concerned and in not compensating the financial burden of the tax amounts unduly withheld.

---

(1)  
  OJ C 340 of 5.9.2022.

---
No. 11-10023.

#### Cooper *v.*Missouri and Krupp *v.*Missouri

(Reported below: 356 S. W. 3d 148);

(356 S. W. 3d 142). Sup. Ct. Mo. Certiorari denied.