alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 40 (Friday, February 28, 1997)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 9347]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5260]


      

[[Page 9345]]

_______________________________________________________________________

Part IV





The President





_______________________________________________________________________



Notice of February 27, 1997--Continuation of the National Emergency 
Relating to Cuba and of the Emergency Authority Relating to the 
Regulation of the Anchorage and Movement of Vessels


                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 40 / Friday, February 28, 1997 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 9347]]

                Notice of February 27, 1997

                
Continuation of the National Emergency Relating 
                to Cuba and of the Emergency Authority Relating to the 
                Regulation of the Anchorage and Movement of Vessels

                On March 1, 1996, by Proclamation 6867, I declared a 
                national emergency to address the disturbance or 
                threatened disturbance of international relations 
                caused by the February 24, 1996, destruction by the 
                Government of Cuba of two unarmed U.S.-registered 
                civilian aircraft in international airspace north of 
                Cuba. In July 1995, the Government of Cuba demonstrated 
                a ready and reckless use of force against U.S. 
                registered vessels that entered into Cuban territorial 
                waters that resulted in damage and injury to persons on 
                board. In July 1996, the Government of Cuba stated its 
                intent to forcefully defend its sovereignty against any 
                U.S.-registered vessels or aircraft that might enter 
                Cuban territorial waters or airspace while involved in 
                a memorial flotilla and peaceful protest. Since these 
                events, the Government of Cuba has not demonstrated 
                that it will refrain from the future use of reckless 
                and excessive force against U.S. vessels or aircraft 
                that may engage in memorial activities or peaceful 
                protest north of Cuba. Therefore, in accordance with 
                section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 
                U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing the national emergency 
                with respect to Cuba and the emergency authority 
                relating to the regulation of the anchorage and 
                movement of vessels set out in Proclamation 6867.

                This notice shall be published in the Federal Register 
                and transmitted to the Congress.

                    (Presidential Sig.)<Clinton1><Clinton2>

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    February 27, 1997.

[FR Doc. 97-5260
Filed 2-27-97; 11:22 am]
Billing code 3195-01-P
EXHIBIT 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned officer of the Cabinet Acquisition Corporation
 (the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2009 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects,
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ Marla Beans
                                 Chief Financial Officer
				and Director
Date: November 13, 2009
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6058

JOLLY P. HINTON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MISS PEARCE; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER WESTBROOK;

SERGEANT DAMMERMAN; SERGEANT RICHARDSON;

PATRICIA HAGLER; HARRY ALLSBROOK; ROBERT

ROHEX; SERGEANT CRAFFORD; SERGEANT JUSTICE;

SERGEANT NICK; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER ADAM;

CORRECTIONAL OFFICER HUNTER; CORRECTIONAL

OFFICER PEARCE; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER ODOM;

CORRECTIONAL OFFICER TAYLOR; CORRECTIONAL

OFFICER FLANAGAN; MR. MOORE; CAPTAIN MURPHY;

LIEUTENANT CHERRY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District

Judge. (CA-96-697-CT-H)

Submitted: June 24, 1997 Decided: September 3, 1997

Before HALL, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Jolly P. Hinton, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Jolly P. Hinton appeals the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court, but modify to reflect that the dismissal is without prejudice. Hinton v. Pearce, No. CA-96-697-CT-H (E.D.N.C. Dec. 18,

1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**Certification
      Pursuant to**


**18
      U.S.C. Section 1350,**


**as
      Adopted Pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Telestone Technologies Corporation
      (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with
      the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Han
      Daqing, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Dated: November
      14, 2008




By:
            /s/
                Han DaqingName:
            Han
                DaqingTitle:
            Chief
                Executive Officer (Principal Executive
                Officer)
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Martin ARAMBUL-DURAN, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-10964 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed February 23, 2018

James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Peter Michael Fleury, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth, TX, Lara Wynn, Federal Pub-lie Defender’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Defendant-Appellant

Before JOLLY, JONES, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Martin Arambul-Duran appeals his conviction and 30-month sentence for illegal reentry after removal from the United States. He argues that his sentence exceeded the statutory maximum because the enhanced penalty provision of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) is unconstitutional. He also asserts that his guilty plea was invalid because he was not admonished that his pri- or felony conviction could not be used to enhance his sentence under § 1326(b) unless it was submitted to a jury and proved beyond a reasonable doubt.

However, Arambul-Duran has filed an unopposed motion for summary disposition and a letter brief conceding that these issues are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), and explaining that he has raised the issues only to preserve them for possible further review. Accordingly, because summary disposition is appropriate, *see Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis,*406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969), Arambul-Duran’s motion is GRANTED. The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R, 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
EXHIBIT 12

                            PSEG ENERGY HOLDINGS LLC
               COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 For the Year Ended December 31,
                                                            -----------------------------------------
                                                             2002     2001     2000     1999     1998
                                                            -----    -----    -----    -----    -----
                                                                            (Millions)
<S>                                                         <C>      <C>      <C>      <C>      <C>
Earnings as Defined in Regulation S-K (A):

Pre-tax (Loss)  Income from Continuing Operations           $(357)   $ 255    $ 176    $ 195    $ 116

Loss/(Income) from Equity Investees, Net of Distributions
                                                               11      (74)     (11)       9       28
Fixed Charges                                                 229      199      157      105       96
Capitalized Interest                                          (12)     (16)     (21)      (6)       1
                                                            -----    -----    -----    -----    -----
Earnings                                                    $(129)   $ 364    $ 301    $ 303    $ 241
                                                            =====    =====    =====    =====    =====

Fixed Charges as Defined in Regulation S-K (B)

Interest Expense                                              227      196      154      102       93
Interest Factor in Rentals                                      2        3        3        3        3
                                                            -----    -----    -----    -----    -----
Total Fixed Charges                                         $ 229    $ 199    $ 157    $ 105    $  96
                                                            =====    =====    =====    =====    =====

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges (C)                      (0.56)    1.83     1.92    $2.89     2.51
                                                            =====    =====    =====    =====    =====
</TABLE>

(A)  The term "earnings" shall be defined as pretax income from continuing
     operations before income or loss from equity investees plus distributed
     income from equity investees. Add to pretax income the amount of fixed
     charges adjusted to exclude the amount of any interest capitalized during
     the period.

(B)  Fixed Charges represent (a) interest, whether expensed or capitalized, (b)
     amortization of debt discount, premium and expense and (c) an estimate of
     interest implicit in rentals.

(C)  The ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges for the year ended December 31, 2002
     was (.56), as noted above, which represents a deficiency of $100 million.
#### Jimmie Williams v. Frank Stoutamire, Sheriff, Leon County.

152 So. 850.

Order Entered February 22, 1934.

J. *H. Harrell,*for Petitioner;

*Frank Stoutamire, in pro. per.,*for Respondent.

Davis, C. J.

— This cause coming, on to be heard upon the return to the writ of habeas corpus issued herein and evidence having been heard and considered by me concerning the probability of the guilt of the accused of the offense for which he is being held, I am of the opinion that the prisoner should not be discharged on the evidence adduced. See Kay v. State, decided at the present term, opinion filed February 21, 1934. But petitioner having moved for a reduction of bail and having tendered cash bail in the sum of *69$100.00 to secure his appearance at the next term of the Circuit Court of Leon County, Florida, which tender is acceptable to the State Attorney of the Second Judicial Circuit who appeared on behalf of the State in this cause before me, it is thereupon considered and ordered by me, acting pursuant to the authority vested in me as a Justice of the Supreme Court of Florida under Section 5 of Article V of the Constitution of this State, that the respondent Jimmie Williams be admitted to bail in the sum of one hundred dollars, conditioned on his appearance at the next term of the Circuit Court in and for Leon County, Florida, and to attend from day to day thereon, until discharged or otherwise dealt with according to' law, said bond to be in writing and secured by a deposit of one hundred dollars in cash collateral security to be deposited and retained together with the written bond, with the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Leon County, Florida, said bond to be first approved as to its form and substance by the Sheriff of Leon County, Florida, whose authority to accept same, deposit it with the Clerk, and release said prisoner thereon shall be this order.

Done and ordered by me at Tallahassee, Florida, this February 22, 1934.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-1198

FRANKLIN C. REAVES, Ph.D., and others similarly situated, 

 Plaintiff – Appellant, 

 v. 

SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, Willie D. 

Reaves; HYBERT N. STRICKLAND, individually and in his 

official capacity; SHERRY RHODES, individually and in her 

official capacity as Clerk of Court of Marion County; MARION 

COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; MARK RICHARDSON, individually 

and in his official capacity as Sheriff of Marion County; 

DEPUTY SMITH, individually and in his official capacity; 

DEPUTY DAVIS, individually and in his official capacity; 

MARION COUNTY JAIL; MARION COUNTY PRISON FARM, TIM HARPER, 

individually and in his official capacity as Marion County 

Administrator, 

 Defendants – Appellees. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. 

(4:08-cv-00576-TLW) 

Submitted: June 18, 2009 Decided: June 23, 2009 

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 
Franklin C. Reaves, Ph.D., Appellant Pro Se. Robert Thomas 

King, WILLCOX BUYCK & WILLIAMS, PA, Florence, South Carolina, 

for Appellees. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 

2 
3 

PER CURIAM: 

Franklin C. Reaves seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration pursuant to 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). We dismiss the appeal 

for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not 

timely filed. 

Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of 

the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, 

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends 

the appeal period, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the 

appeal period, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of 

a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional 

requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, __, 127 S. Ct. 

2360, 2366 (2007). 

The district court’s order was entered on the docket 

on January 20, 2009. The notice of appeal was filed on February 

20, 2009. Because Reaves failed to file a timely notice of 

appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal 

period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Exhibit 99.1


      Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
             of Monument Resources, Inc. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350


     I, A.G. Foust, certify that:

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Monument
Resources, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, A.G. Foust, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                    By: /s/  A.G. Foust
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                    Name:    A.G. Foust
                                    Title:   Chief Executive Officer and
                                             Chief Financial Officer
                                    Date:    May 13, 2003
# IMMC.EESC-2018-04576-AC.ENG.xhtml.EESC-2018-04576-00-00-AC-TRA-EN.docx

EN

European Economic and Social Committee

European Economic and Social Committee

REX/515

REX/515

Overseas Association Decision

Overseas Association Decision

OPINION


  European Economic and Social Committee


  Proposal for a Council Decision on the Association of the Overseas Countries and Territories with the European Union including relations between the European on the one hand, and Greenland and the Kingdom of Denmark on the other ('Overseas Association Decision')

  [COM(2018) 461 final]

OPINION

European Economic and Social Committee

Proposal for a Council Decision on the Association of the Overseas Countries and Territories with the European Union including relations between the European on the one hand, and Greenland and the Kingdom of Denmark on the other ('Overseas Association Decision')

[COM(2018) 461 final]

Referral

| Referral | Commission, 12/07/2018 |
| --- | --- |
| Legal basis | Article 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union |
| Section responsible | Section for External Relations |
| Adopted at plenary | 17/10/2018 |
| Plenary session No | 538 |
| Outcome of vote
  (for/against/abstentions) | 207/0/6 |

Referral

Commission, 12/07/2018

Commission, 12/07/2018

Legal basis

Legal basis

Article 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Article 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Section responsible

Section responsible

Section for External Relations

Section for External Relations

Adopted at plenary

Adopted at plenary

17/10/2018

17/10/2018

Plenary session No

Plenary session No

538

538

Outcome of vote
  (for/against/abstentions)

Outcome of vote
  (for/against/abstentions)

207/0/6

207/0/6

Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 538th plenary session of 17 and 18 October 2018 (meeting of 17 October 2018), by 207 votes to 0 with 6 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 538th plenary session of 17 and 18 October 2018 (meeting of 17 October 2018), by 207 votes to 0 with 6 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Brussels, 17 October 2018

Brussels, 17 October 2018

Luca JAHIER

  The president of the European Economic and Social Committee

_____________
#### COM. v. MAGONDU, F.

729 EDA 2017

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/19/2017

CP-09-CR-0005079-2008 (Bucks)

Affirmed — Application to Withdraw as Counsel Granted
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 45 (Friday, March 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10519-10520]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5705]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    DOC has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for

[[Page 10520]]

clearance the following proposal for collection of information under 
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Agency: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
    Title: Southwest Region Permit Family of Forms.
    Form Number(s): None prescribed.
    OMB Approval Number: 0648-0204.
    Type of Request: Revision of a currently approved collection.
    Burden: 65 hours.
    Number of Respondents: 95.
    Avg Hours Per Response: Ranges between 30 minutes and 2 hours 
depending on the requirement.
    Needs and Uses: Permits are required for persons to participate in 
Federally-managed fisheries in the Western Pacific Region. The permit 
applications forms provide basic information about permit holders and 
the vessels and gear being used. This information is important to 
understand the nature of the fisheries, entry and exit patterns, and 
the extent to which fishing is likely to effect the stocks and 
businesses related to the fishery. Permitting actions provide an 
important link to the participants so that the National Marine 
Fisheries Service officials can explain the regulations that apply to 
the fishery as well as emphasize the importance of complying with the 
regulations and reporting requirements. This collection covers three 
types of permits--basic permits, limited entry permits and experimental 
permits.
    Affected Public: Businesses or other for-profit organizations, 
individuals or households.
    Frequency: Annually, on occasion, variable.
    Respondent's Obligation: Mandatory.
    OMB Desk Officer: Adele Morris, (202) 395-7340.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing Linda Engelmeier, DOC Forms Clearance Officer, 
(202) 482-3272, Department of Commerce, Room 5327, 14th and 
Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20230.
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this Notice 
to Adele Morris, OMB Desk Officer, Room 10202, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, D.C. 20503.

    Dated: February 27, 1997.
Linda Engelmeier,
Departmental Forms Clearance Officer, Office of Management and 
Organization.
[FR Doc. 97-5705 Filed 3-6-97: 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P