alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.1


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mayor's Jewelers, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 2, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas
A. Andruskevich, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
         of the Company.


Date: December 17, 2002


/s/ Thomas A. Andruskevich
------------------------------------
Thomas A. Andruskevich
Chief Executive Officer
## ELECTRONIC RECORD 

# /578-/V

COA # 05-12-01061-CR Darrell Dewayne Sneed v. The 

### STYLE: Stateof Texas COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRM 

### OFFENSE: 30.02F1 

### COUNTY: Dallas TRIAL COURT: Criminal District Court No. 7 DATE: 10/30/2014 Publish: NO TC CASE #: F11-60730-Y



### IN THE COURTOF CRIMINALAPPEALS Darrell Dewayne Sneed v. The State STYLE: ofTexas 

## PROSE Petition FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: 

# KefutiTb DATE: 

## aiLfpy(&o/r 

# I JUDGE: 

# & dd L/tVUMrtT— CCA#: 

# iS7$«/y CCADisposition: DATE: JUDGE: SIGNED: PUBLISH:

REHEARING IN CCA IS: JUDGE: PC:_ DNP:

MOTION FOR

ELECTRONIC RECORD
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 43 (Wednesday, March 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 10025]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5407]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
[A-428-820]


Small Diameter Circular Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel Standard, 
Line, and Pressure Pipe From Germany; Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review; Extension of Time Limit

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of extension of time limit.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is extending the 
time limit of the preliminary results of the antidumping duty 
administrative review of Small Diameter Circular Seamless Carbon and 
Alloy Steel Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe from Germany. This review 
covers the period January 27, 1995 through July 31, 1996.

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 5, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Decker or Linda Ludwig, Office 
of AD/CVD Enforcement, Group III, Import Administration, International 
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-1324 
or 482-3833, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Department has received a timely cost 
allegation from Petitioner. We have initiated a cost of production 
investigation based on these allegations. Because of the cost 
investigation, it is not practicable to complete this review within the 
original time limit. The Department is extending the time limit for 
completion of the preliminary results until September 2, 1997, in 
accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Trade and Tariff Act of 
1930, as amended by the Uruguay Round Agreements Act of 1994. The 
deadline for the final results of this review will continue to be 120 
days after publication of the preliminary results.
    This extension is in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1675 (a)(3)(A)).

    Dated: February 27, 1997.
Joseph A. Spetrini,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, Enforcement Group III.
[FR Doc. 97-5407 Filed 3-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
DISMISS and Opinion Filed April 14, 2015 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-14-01498-CV

CARL T. BRANDT AND VICKIE S. BRANDT, Appellants V. C & S RESOURCES, INC., Appellee
On Appeal from the 192nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-14-06584



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Francis, Lang-Miers, and Whitehill Opinion by Justice Whitehill Before the Court is appellants’ unopposed moti on to dismiss the appeal. Appellants have
informed the Court that they no longer wish to pursue the a ppeal. Accordingly, we grant
appellants’ motion and dismiss the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(1).

141498F.P05 /Bill Whitehill/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE–2– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT

CARL T. BRANDT AND VICKIE S. BRANDT, Appellants

No. 05-14-01498-CV V.

C & S RESOURCES, INC., Appellee On Appeal from the 192nd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas. Trial Court Cause No. DC-14-06584. Opinion delivered by Justice Whitehill. Justices Francis and Lang-Miers, participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opi nion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

.
It is ORDERED that the parties bear their own costs of this appeal.

Judgment entered April 14, 2015.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 41 (Monday, March 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 9421]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5097]



[[Page 9421]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. CP97-252-000]


Koch Gateway Pipeline Company; Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

February 25, 1996.
    Take notice that on February 19, 1997, Koch Gateway Pipeline 
Company (Koch Gateway), P.O. Box 1478, Houston, TX 77251-1478, filed in 
the above docket, a request pursuant to Sections 157.205 and 
157.211(a)(2) of the Commission's Regulations, for authorization to 
operate as a jurisdictional facility, a 2-inch tap and 2-inch meter 
station placed in service under Section 311(a) of the Natural Gas Act 
and Section 284.3(c) of the Commission's Regulations. Koch Gateway 
makes such requests, under its blanket certificate issued in Docket No. 
CP82-430, and pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act and Section 
284.3(c) of the Commission's Regulations. Koch Gateway makes such 
requests, under its blanket certificate issued in Docket No. CP82-430, 
and pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act, all as more fully set 
forth in the request which is file with the Commission and open to 
public inspection.
    Koch Gateway states that the proposed certification of facilities 
will enable Koch Gateway to provide transportation services under its 
blanket transportation certificate through an existing meter station 
serving Entex Inc. (Entex), a Local Distribution Company, in Jasper 
County, TX. Koch Gateway further states it will operate the proposed 
facilities in compliance with 18 CFR, part 157, Subpart F, and the 
proposed activities will not affect Koch Gateway's ability to serve its 
other existing customers.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 
385.214) a motion to intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant 
to Section 157.205 of the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 
157.205) a protest to the request. If no protest is filed within the 
time allowed therefor, the proposed activity is deemed to be authorized 
effective on the day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a 
protest is filed and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time 
allowed for filing a protest, the instant request shall be treated as 
an application for authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural 
Gas Act.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-5097 Filed 2-28-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
ex10_31.htm


Exhibit 10.31


 


ANTHERA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.


Deferred Compensation Election Form


 







 



	
I.

	
Elective Deferral Percentages







 


As specified below, I elect pursuant to the Deferred Compensation Agreement entered into by Anthera Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) and me as of the 7th day of December, 2013  (the “Deferred Compensation Agreement”) to defer receipt of that percentage of my Eligible Compensation which would otherwise be paid to me for services during 2014 (with respect to compensation earned with respect to services to be performed by me subsequent to the date of this election) and subsequent calendar years:


 



	
Deferral Percentage:

	
Base Annual Salary:

	
35%


	  	
Annual Bonus:

	
40%







 


I understand that this election is irrevocable for 2014 and that unless and until this election is changed prospectively for future calendar years on a new election form before those years begin, this election shall continue as shown above for all subsequent calendar years.  Capitalized terms used in this election will have the meaning given such terms in the Deferred Compensation Agreement.


 



	
II.

	
Form and Timing of Payment of Account







 


I understand that my Account will be paid to me upon the first to occur of the dates specified in Section 3 of the Deferred Compensation Agreement and that I may specify a date for subsection (i) of such Section 3.  The date I specify for subsection (i) of Section 3 of the Deferred Compensation Agreement is January 1, 2017.  I understand that if I do not specify a date, that the Account will be paid to me upon the first to occur of the dates/events specified in subsections (ii) through (v) of Section 3 of the Deferred Compensation Agreement.  At the End of the Deferral Period, my Account will be paid as specified in Section 4 of the Deferred Compensation Agreement, subject to the requirements of Section 8 of the Deferred Compensation Agreement.


 


I understand that any amounts deferred by this election and any other amounts deferred by me pursuant to the Deferred Compensation Agreement shall be credited to a bookkeeping account established for me by the Company and that any segregation of Company assets intended to satisfy the obligations of the Company under the Deferred Compensation Agreement shall not confer a beneficial ownership interest on me and any such assets shall remain subject to the claims of the general creditors of the Company in the event of the bankruptcy or insolvency of the Company.


 



Executed on the date specified below.




 




  





  











  






 



	           	 	 	December 7th, 2013
	Executive: Paul F. Truex 	 	    Date     	 
	Title: President & CEO	 	 	 





 


 


Receipt of Form by Company


 




	Received by:	 	 
	 	 	 






	
Title:  SVP Finance & Administration & Principal Accounting Officer

	 	 





 



	
Date signed:  December 7th 2013
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ER IC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. C ARL LAR

UE GODFREY, a .k.a . C a rl Godfre y , a .k.a . C arl La

urue Godfre y , De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 11-50534

D.C . No. 8:09-c r-00060-JVS M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the C e ntra l Distric t of C a lifornia Jam e s V. Se lna , Distric t

Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d

Nove m b e r 19, 2013 ** B e fore : C ANB Y, TR OTT a nd THOM AS, C i rc uit Judge s. C arl La rue Godfre y

a ppe a ls from

distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt a nd c ha lle nge s the 7 0-m o nth se nte nc e im p ose d following his guilty -ple a c onvic tion for a iding a

nd a be tting m a il fra

ud, in viola

tion of 18 U.S.C . §§ 2 a

n d 1341. W e dism iss. 

# FIL ED NOV 26 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).Godfre y c onte nds tha

t the distric t

c o urt proc e dura lly

e rre d at se nte nc ing by fa iling to hold a

he aring on a

dispute d issuere ga

rding thec a lc ulat ion of his c rim ina l history c at e gory . The gove rnm e nt a rgue s tha t the a p pe a l is ba

rre d by a va lid a ppe a l wa ive r. W e re v ie w de novo whe the r a de fe nda nt ha s wa ive d his right to a p pe a l. Se e Unite d State

s v . W atson , 582 F.3d 974, 981 (9th C i r. 2009). Godfre y c onte nds tha

t the a ppe a l wa ive r doe s not a

pply be c a use the distric t c ourt fa ile d to c a lc ulate prope rly his c rim ina l history

and the gove rnm e nt bre a c he d the a gre e m e nt be c a

use it fa ile d to re c o m

m e nd a se nte n c e at the bottom

of the a pplic a ble Guide line s range . The pla in la ngua ge of the a

ppe a l wa i ve r una m biguously e nc o m pa sse s the distric t c ourt’ s de te rm ination of Godfre y ’ s c rim ina l history c at e gory . Se e Unite d State s v . Harris , 628 F.3d 1203, 1206-07 (9th C ir. 2011). Furthe r, the gove rnm e nt did not bre a c h the ple a a gre e m e nt be c a use it re c om

m e n de d a se nte nc e at the bottom

of the c orre c tly

c a lc ulate d Guide line s ra

nge . Ac c ordingly , we dism iss this a ppe a l in light of the

va lid a ppe a l wa ive r. Se e id. at

988. DISM I SSE D.

1 1 - 5 0 5 3 4 2
ex10-18.htm


Exhibit 10.18


 


FIRST AMENDMENT TO LOCK-UP AGREEMENT


 







 


This First Amendment to the Lock-Up Agreement is executed on this 25th day of March, 2014.  Reference is made to that certain the Lock-Up Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated June 30, 2011, by and between, Ya Ming Wong, a shareholder of the Company (the “Holder”) and Nova LifeStyle, Inc.,  a Nevada corporation (the “Company”).  Any capitalized terms in this amendment not otherwise defined shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Lock-Up Agreement (the “Agreement”).


 


WHEREAS, the parties agree that the definition of Lock-Up Period in the Agreement is not clear with respect to the situation of an Offering closing within one year from the date of the Agreement;







WHEREAS, the parties further agree to clarify the lock up period if the closing of an Offering does occur within one year from the date of the Agreement.


 


NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:


 


1. The seventh paragraph of the Agreement shall be modified to add a new item (iii) as follows: if the closing of an Offering does occur within one year from the date hereof, then three years from the date hereof.  After the modification, the seventh paragraph of the Agreement shall read as follows:


 


This Letter Agreement shall commence as of the date hereof and automatically terminate upon the earliest to occur of (i) three years following the date the Company’s securities are listed on a registered national securities exchange, (ii) if the closing of an Offering does not occur within one year from the date hereof, then two years from the date hereof, or (iii) if the closing of an Offering does occur within one year from the date hereof, then three years from the date hereof (the “Lock-Up Period”)


 


2. This first amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts each of which shall constitute an original but all of which when taken together shall constitute but one contract.


 


3. Except as amended hereby, or as otherwise amended, the Agreement is in all respects ratified and confirmed and the provisions thereof shall remain in full force and effect.


 


(THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)


(SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS)


 




  





1











  






 


 


                     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this FIRST AMENDMENT TO LOCK-UP AGREEMENT on the date first written above.


 












For and on behalf of:


 


NOVA LIFESTYLE, INC.



	  	  
	  	
 


By_____________________


Name: Tawny Lam


Title: Chairperson and President













	  	
 


YA MING WONG

	  
	  	
By_____________________


Name: Ya Ming Wong


 

	  












  





2
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8683 

To amend the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act to exclude certain payments to Alaska Native elders for determining eligibility for certain 

programs, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 23, 2020 

Mr. YOUNG introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act to exclude certain payments to Alaska Native elders for determining eligibility for certain programs, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY FOR CERTAIN PROGRAMS. 

4 Section 29(c) of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement 

5 Act (43 U.S.C. 1626(c)) is amended— 

6 (1) in subparagraph (D) following the undesig7 nated following paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘and’’ at 

8 the end; 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8683 IH

1 (2) in subparagraph (E) following the undesig2 nated following paragraph (3), by striking the period 

3 at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

4 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

5 ‘‘(F) an amount distributed or benefit provided 

6 by a Settlement Trust to a Native or descendant of 

7 a Native who is 65 years of age or older.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 74

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Concerning the situation between the Democratic

Korea.People’s Republic of Korea and the Republic of
105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 74

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas the Korean demilitarized zone remains extremely

tense 44 years after the ending of the Korean War, as

evidenced most recently by a mortar attack and exchange

of gunfire on July 17, 1997;

Whereas with more than 1,000,000 soldiers in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea and 600,000 soldiers in
2

•HCON 74 EH

the Republic of Korea, both militaries are on a constant

high alert;

Whereas the threat of North-South military confrontation between the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea and the

Republic of Korea is of grave concern to the United

States;

Whereas 37,000 United States troops are stationed on the

Korean Peninsula;

Whereas the United States and the Republic of Korea have

long had a close relationship based on mutual respect,

shared security goals, and shared interests;

Whereas as a result of an invitation extended last year by

President Clinton and Republic of Korea President Kim

Young Sam, four-party preparatory talks involving the

United States, the Republic of Korea, the Democratic

People’s Republic of Korea, and the People’s Republic of

China are likely to begin in August 1997 to determine

timing, venue, level of representation, and broad agenda

categories for forthcoming talks;

Whereas the participation of China is integral to the success

of any agreement; and

Whereas it will be impossible to resolve the conflict on the

Korean Peninsula and fashion a lasting solution unless

the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea and the Republic of Korea engage in direct dialogue, without depending on other parties to act as intermediaries: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—
3

•HCON 74 EH

1 (1) supports United States troops who have

2 faithfully served the interests of the United States

3 by ensuring stability on the Korean Peninsula;

4 (2) supports our Republic of Korea allies who

5 have made good faith efforts to resolve this conflict;

6 and

7 (3) supports four-way talks between the United

8 States, China, the Republic of Korea, and the Demo9 cratic People’s Republic of Korea to peacefully and

10 permanently resolve the conflict between the two Ko11 reas.

Passed the House of Representatives July 28, 1997.

Attest:

Clerk.
# C_2023015EN.01003303.xml

| 16.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 15/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 15/33

---

Order of the President of the Court of 12 September 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — Belgium) — ME v État belge

(Case C-191/22) (1)

(2023/C 15/41)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 213, 30.5.2022.

---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 40 (Friday, February 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 9191]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5148]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System.

FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: 62 FR 8017, 
February 21, 1997.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETING: 10:00 a.m., 
Wednesday, February 26, 1997.

CHANGES IN THE MEETING: The open meeting has been canceled.
    1. The item regarding proposed technical and clarifying amendments 
to Regulation CC (Availability of Funds and Collection of Checks) 
(proposed earlier for public comment; Docket No. R-0926) was handled 
via notation vote.
    2. The item regarding proposals concerning (a) guidelines for the 
use of volume-based pricing for Federal Reserve priced services and (b) 
volume-based fees for the automated clearing house (ACH) service was 
deleted from the meeting.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Mr. Joseph R. Coyne, Assistant to 
the Board; (202) 452-3204.

    Dated: February 26, 1997.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-5148 Filed 2-26-97; 11:56 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
653. 

OFFICEOFTHEA~ORNEYGENERALOFTEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Homrabls Joseph r. Blah&8 

City Attorney ior Cwldo Mills 

Ysdlaal Art8 Bullding 

Ureenville, Tax68 

Dear Sir: 

We 66lrmmledg6 

date and quote trim yo 

letter of reeent~ 

red to lasue moh 

autL6r0t19D1 

the 188uanoe of bonds for the 

ng w6h lndebtednee8?w 

re that we undemtand your questloam 

do beliwe that we understand then 

newer themwlth referen to the 

e8 we onUer8tand them. 

The total emouixt or wanaatls lnrolved fe oalf 

#Z,OoO end for that rea8on no t6raalitisr rere reptrlr6d 

prelitaimary to their ltmmme. There epp6are to have bean 

a eufrlolent px levy at the time the warrant8 w6r6 imsed. 
6.52 

Eonoreble Joseph F. Riohols, Ootober 19.1939, page #2 

Ir th6g wore Ieeued In paymmt or a valid debt, and It 

appear@ tbat they were, then nith this tax levy, they were 

svidently valid, because Item of indebtedness of $2,000 

and less are exempt iron the other formlltles required by 

the Bona and ?:aW?3ot bW Of 19% 

The Bond and Warrant Law or i931, Sectlon 7, Subneation (d), authorize8 ruch mrrantr to be iunded Inte 

bonds; but authority to fund auoh warrants Into funding 

warrants ssena to be absent tram the law. 

Therefore, It app6ers thatthese warrants 8hould 

either remain In their original form or be funded by the 

Iemanae or runding bonds. (Hot funding warrantr). Ii 

suoh fundding bon&a am be lmmed, then they muat be 

1smed undtr Article 236sa, Rerf86d Civil ~atut.66 Or 

1925, and your attention Is oalled to the three week0 

publloetlon 0r e SO-day notice a8 provIdea by mbseotion 

(a) of Seation 7 of the abov6 mentioned law. 

V6ry truly yours 

ATTORXEY UW OF TEXAS 

COB-s 

APPROVEDOCT 24, 1939 

ATTQEWEy GENERAL OB TEXAS 

APPROVED 

CPINICN 0 COMMIITEI! 

&gL