Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 45 / Friday, March 7, 1997 / Notices 10523

interested party must specify the

individual producers or exporters

covered by the order or suspension

agreement for which they are requesting

a review (Interim Regulations, 60 FR

25130, 25137 (May 11, 1995)).

Therefore, for both antidumping and

countervailing duty reviews, the

interested party must specify for which

individual producers or exporters

covered by an antidumping finding or

an antidumping or countervailing duty

order it is requesting a review, and the

requesting party must state why it

desires the Secretary to review those

particular producers or exporters. If the

interested party intends for the

Secretary to review sales of merchandise

by an exporter (or a producer if that

producer also exports merchandise from

other suppliers) which were produced

in more than one country of origin, and

each country of origin is subject to a

separate order, then the interested party

must state specifically, on an order-byorder basis, which exporter(s) the

request is intended to cover.

Seven copies of the request should be

submitted to the Assistant Secretary for

Import Administration, International

Trade Administration, Room B–099,

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th

Street & Constitution Avenue, N.W.,

Washington, D.C. 20230. The

Department also asks parties to serve a

copy of their requests to the Office of

Antidumping/Countervailing

Enforcement, Attention: Sheila Forbes,

in room 3065 of the main Commerce

Building. Further, in accordance with

section 353.31(g) or 355.3(g) of the

regulations, a copy of each request must

be served on every party on the

Department’s service list.

The Department will publish in the

Federal Register a notice of ‘‘Initiation

of Administrative Review of

Antidumping or Countervailing Duty

Order, Finding, or Suspended

Investigation,’’ for requests received by

the last day of March 1997. If the

Department does not receive, by the last

day of March 1997, a request for review

of entries covered by an order, finding,

or suspended investigation listed in this

notice and for the period identified

above, the Department will instruct the

Customs Service to assess antidumping

or countervailing duties on those entries

at a rate equal to the cash deposit of (or

bond for) estimated antidumping or

countervailing duties required on those

entries at the time of entry, or

withdrawal from warehouse, for

consumption and to continue to collect

the cash deposit previously ordered.

This notice is not required by statute,

but is published as a service to the

international trading community.

Dated: February 25, 1997.

Joseph A. Spetrini,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Group III.

[FR Doc. 97–5627 Filed 3–6–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–M

Determination Not To Revoke

Antidumping Duty Orders and

Findings Nor To Terminate Suspended

Investigations

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Determination not to revoke

antidumping duty orders and findings

nor to terminate suspended

investigations.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce

is notifying the public of its

determination not to revoke the

antidumping duty orders and findings

nor to terminate the suspended

investigations listed below.

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 7, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Michael Panfeld or the analyst listed

under Antidumping Proceeding at:

Import Administration, International

Trade Administration, U.S. Department

of Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution

Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20230.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The

Department of Commerce (the

Department) may revoke an

antidumping duty order or finding or

terminate a suspended investigation,

pursuant to 19 CFR § 353.25(d)(4)(iii), if

no interested party has requested an

administrative review for four

consecutive annual anniversary months

and no domestic interested party objects

to the revocation or requests an

administrative review.

We had not received a request to

conduct an administrative review for

the most recent four consecutive annual

anniversary months. Therefore,

pursuant to § 353.25(d)(4)(i) of the

Department’s regulations, on November

27, 1996, we published in the Federal

Register a notice of intent to revoke

these antidumping duty orders and

findings and to terminate the suspended

investigations and served written notice

of the intent to each domestic interested

party on the Department’s service list in

each case. Within the specified time

frame, we received objections from

domestic interested parties to our intent

to revoke these antidumping duty orders

and findings and to terminate the

suspended investigations. Therefore,

because domestic interested parties

objected to our intent to revoke or

terminate, we no longer intend to revoke

these antidumping duty orders and

findings or to terminate the suspended

investigations.

Antidumping Proceeding

A–351–602

Brazil

Certain Carbon Steel Butt-Weld Pipe

Fittings

Objection Date: December 12, 1996,

December 13, 1996

Objector: Hackney Inc., Tube Forgings

of America Inc., et al

Contact: Thomas Schauer at (202) 482–

4852

A–428–062

Germany

Animal Glue and Inedible Gelatin

Objection Date: December 27, 1996

Objector: Hudson Industries

Corporation

Contact: Tom Killiam at (202) 482–2704

A–588–809

Japan

Business Telephone Systems

Objection Date: December 30, 1996

Objector: Lucent Technologies Inc.

Contact: Hermes Pinilla at (202) 482–

4733

A–588–405

Japan

Cellular Mobile Telephones and

Subassemblies

Objection Date: December 11, 1996

Objector: Motorola Inc.

Contact: Charles Riggle at (202) 482–

0650

A–588–811

Japan

Drafting Machines and Parts Thereof

Objection Date: December 6, 1996

Objector: Vemco Corporation

Contact: Mathew Blaskovich at (202)

482–5831

A–588–068

Japan

Steel Wire Strand

Objection Date: December 18, 1996

Objector: Florida Wire & Cable

Company

Contact: Kris Campbell at (202) 482–

3813

A–614–502

New Zealand

Low-Fuming Brazing Copper Rod &

Wire

Objection Date: December 6, 1996

Objector: Copper & Brass Fabricators

Council

Contact: Tamara Underwood at (202)

482–0197

A–583–508

Taiwan

Porcelain-On-Steel Cooking Ware

Objection Date: December 23, 1996

Objector: General Housewares

Corporation
10524 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 45 / Friday, March 7, 1997 / Notices

Contact: Amy Wei at (202) 482–1131

Dated: February 26, 1997.

Richard W. Moreland,

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for

AD/CVD Enforcement.

[FR Doc. 97–5628 Filed 3–6–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

Determination Not To Revoke

Antidumping Duty Orders and

Findings Nor To Terminate Suspended

Investigations

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Determination not to revoke

antidumping duty orders and findings

nor to terminate suspended

investigations.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce

is notifying the public of its

determination not to revoke the

antidumping duty orders and findings

nor to terminate the suspended

investigations listed below.

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 7, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Michael Panfeld or the analyst listed

under Antidumping Proceeding at:

Import Administration, International

Trade Administration, U.S. Department

of Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution

Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20230.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The

Department of Commerce (the

Department) may revoke an

antidumping duty order or finding or

terminate a suspended investigation,

pursuant to 19 CFR § 353.25(d)(4)(iii), if

no interested party has requested an

administrative review for four

consecutive annual anniversary months

and no domestic interested party objects

to the revocation or requests an

administrative review.

We had not received a request to

conduct an administrative review for

the most recent four consecutive annual

anniversary months. Therefore,

pursuant to § 353.25(d)(4)(i) of the

Department’s regulations on January 6,

1997, we published in the Federal

Register a notice of intent to revoke

these antidumping duty orders and

findings and to terminate the suspended

investigations and served written notice

of the intent to each domestic interested

party on the Department’s service list in

each case. Within the specified time

frame, we received objections from

domestic interested parties to our intent

to revoke these antidumping duty orders

and findings and to terminate the

suspended investigations. Therefore,

because domestic interested parties

objected to our intent to revoke or

terminate, we no longer intend to revoke

these antidumping duty orders and

findings or to terminate the suspended

investigations.

Antidumping Proceeding

A–351–603

Brazil

Brass Sheet and Strip

Objection Date: January 6, 1997

Objector: Copper & Brass Fabricators

Council, Inc.

Contact: Tom Killiam at (202) 482–

2704

A–122–605

Canada

Color Picture Tubes

Objection Date: January 31, 1997

Objector: AFL-CIO et al

Contact: Valerie Owenby at (202)

482–0145

A–559–601

Singapore

Color Picture Tubes

Objection Date: January 31, 1997

Objector: AFL-CIO et al

Contact: Michael Heaney at (202)

482–4475

A–791–502

South Africa

Brazing Copper Wire and Rod

Objection Date: January 6, 1997

Objector: Copper & Brass Fabricators

Council, Inc.

Contact: Valerie Owenby at (202)

482–0145

A–580–603

South Korea

Brass Sheet and Strip

Objection Date: January 6, 1997

Objector: Copper & Brass Fabricators

Council, Inc.

Contact: Tom Killiam at (202) 482–

2704

A–580–605

South Korea

Color Picture Tubes

Objection Date: January 17, 1997;

January 31, 1997

Objector: Thompson Consumer

Electronics, AFL-CIO et al

Contact: Tamara Underwood at (202)

482–0197

A–583–603

Taiwan

Stainless Steel Cooking Ware

Objection Date: January 9, 1997;

January 14, 1997; January 16, 1997

Objector: Regal Ware, Inc., Revere

Ware Corporation; Fair Trade

Committee of the Cookware

Manufacturers Association

Contact: Valerie Owenby at (202)

482–0145

A–122–701

Canada

Potassium Chloride

Objection Date: January 21, 1997;

January 30, 1997

Objector: Agrium (US), Inc.,

Mississippi Potash, Inc.

Contact: James Rice at (202) 482–1374

Dated: February 26, 1997.

Richard W. Moreland,

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for AD/

CVD Enforcement.

[FR Doc. 97–5629 Filed 3–6–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

[A–421–805]

Aramid Fiber Formed of Poly ParaPhenylene Terephthalamide (PPD–T)

From the Netherlands; Preliminary

Results of Antidumping Administrative

Review

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of preliminary results of

the antidumping duty administrative

review; Aramid fiber formed of poly

para-phenylene terephthalamide from

The Netherlands.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce

(the Department) is conducting an

administrative review of the

antidumping duty order on aramid fiber

formed of poly para-phenylene

terephthalamide (PPD–T aramid) from

the Netherlands in response to requests

by respondent, Akzo Nobel Aramid

Products, Inc. and Aramid Products

V.o.F. (Akzo) and petitioner, E.I. du

Pont de Nemours and Company. This

review covers sales of this merchandise

to the United States during the period

June 1, 1995 through May 31, 1996, by

Akzo Nobel V.o.F. The results of the

review indicate the existence of

dumping margins for the above period.

We invite interested parties to

comment on these preliminary results.

Parties who submit arguments are

requested to submit with the argument

(1) a statement of the issue and (2) a

brief summary of the argument.

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 7, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Nithya Nagarajan at (202) 482–0193,

Eugenia Chu at (202) 482–3964, or Ellen

Knebel at (202) 482–1398, Import

Administration, International Trade

Administration, U.S. Department of

Commerce, Room 7866, 14th Street and

Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington

D.C. 20230.

Applicable Statute and Regulations

Unless otherwise indicated, all

citations to the statute are references to

the provisions effective January 1, 1995,