alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
output_FacilityList

FacilityID met_file rural_urban nad max_dist model_dist

radials circles overlap_dist acute hrselev ratio dep depl phase 01033NEI8522 3000 30Y Y 01033NEI8522b 3000 30Y Y 01115NEIALT$4622 3000 30Y Y 05059NEIART$10783 3000 30Y Y 05115NEI3AR05115JW 3000 30Y Y 13077NEI8066 3000 30Y Y 13133NEI8093 3000 30Y Y 17031NEI3IL17031Ale 3000 30Y Y 18003NEIIN00286 3000 30Y Y 18089NEI3IN18089Jup 3000 30Y Y 18093NEI3IN18093Rec 3000 30Y Y 18113NEIIN567 3000 30Y Y 18169NEI3IN18169Ale 3000 30Y Y 18173NEI32661 3000 30Y Y 19163NEI12240 3000 30Y Y 19163NEI2IA01-089 3000 30Y Y 21009NEIKY0090065 3000 30Y Y 21031NEIKY2103100 3000 30Y Y 21091NEI11360 3000 30Y Y 21091NEI11362 3000 30Y Y 21101NEI11365 3000 30Y Y 21141NEIKY2114100 3000 30Y Y 21151NEI3KY21151Nov 3000 30Y Y 21227NEIKY22700135 3000 30Y Y 26023NEI3MI26023Ale 3000 30Y Y 26023NEIMIN5957 3000 30Y Y 29009NEI18317 3000 30Y Y 29143NEI34464 3000 30Y Y 29510NEI3MO29510JW 3000 30Y Y 34007NEI3NJ34007Alu 3000 30Y Y 36075NEI3NY36075Nov 3000 30Y Y 36089NEI39458 3000 30Y Y 36103NEI3AL01123Cre 3000 30Y Y 39157NEI3OH39157Ale 3000 30Y Y 39157NEIOHT$6308 3000 30Y Y 42071NEI3PA42071Alu 3000 30Y Y 42107NEIPA23-2083 3000 30Y Y 45015NEI3SC45015JW 3000 30Y Y 45015NEI41217 3000 30Y Y 46135NEI790 3000 30Y Y 47009NEI10933 3000 30Y Y 47009NEI10933b 3000 30Y Y 47159NEI3TN47159Wil 3000 30Y Y 48029NEI7212 3000 30Y Y 48037NEI3TX48067Alu 3000 30Y Y 48331NEI6464 3000 30Y Y 53007NEI42328 3000 30Y Y 53073NEIWA19906 3000 30Y Y 54035NEIWV0043 3000 30Y Y 55039NEI43018 3000 30Y Y 55117NEI3WI55001JL 3000 30Y Y

Page 1output_FacilityList

55117NEIWI4600412 3000 30Y Y

Page 2output_FacilityList

pdep pdepl vdep vdepl lscav iscav pop_size user_rcpt bldg_dw ring1 aermod cb All_rcpts

Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y

Page 3output_FacilityList

Y

Page 4
No. 07

- 16

- 00026

- CV

In the Interest of Z.B. and Z.B., Children § § § § From the County Court at Law No

. 1 of Randall County July 12, 2016 Opinion by Justice Pirtle

J U D G M E N T

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated July 12, 2016 , it is ordered, adjudged
and decreed that the trial court ’ s order terminating M.B.’s parental rights to Z.B. and
Z.B. be reversed and it is hereby rendered that the petition for termination filed by the Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services be denied

. It is further
ordered that this cause be remanded to the trial court for further proceedings regarding the terms and conditions of M.B.’s possession of and access t o Z.B. and Z.B. and for a determination of M.B.’s child support obligations.

o O o
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 45 (Friday, March 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 10624]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5584]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Advisory Committee on Geriatrics and Gerontology; Notice of 
Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs gives notice that a meeting of 
the Geriatrics and Gerontology Advisory Committee (GGAC) will be held 
on March 20-21, 1997, at the Department of Veterans Affairs, in Room C-
7 (B&C) located at 810 Vermont Avenue, NW, Washington, DC. The purpose 
of the GGAC is to advise the Secretary of Veterans Affairs and the 
Under Secretary of Health on issues relative to the care and treatment 
of the aging veterans, and to evaluate the Geriatric Research, 
Education, and Clinical Centers (RECCs). The Committee will begin at 
9:00 a.m. (EST) until 5:00 p.m. (EST) on March 20 and will begin at 
9:00 a.m. (EST) until 12:00 noon (EST) on March 21.
    The agenda for March 20 will begin with updates on activities in 
the Office of Geriatrics and Extended Care. The agenda will also cover 
an overview of activities in the offices of Research and Development, 
Employee Education, Academic Affiliations, and Policy.
    On March 21 the Committee will review the three reports of site 
visits of the GRECCS, the activities in the Office of Primary Care and 
the status of GGAC projects as well as plan future activities.
    The meeting will be open to the public. Those wishing to attend 
should contact Jacqueline Holmes, Program Assistant, Geriatrics and 
Extended Care Strategic Healthcare Group at (202) 273-8539 not later 
than March 17, 1997.

    Dated: February 28, 1997.

    By Direction of the Secretary.
Heyward Bannister,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-5584 Filed 3-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
U n i t e d S t a t e s C o u r t o f A p p e a l s F OR T HE D IS TRICT OF C OLUM BIA C IRCUI T

___ ___ ___ ___ No. 19-1216 September Term, 2019 EPA -08/0 9/2 019 Deci sion Filed O n: In re : Se aled Case,
BEFORE: T ate l, Millett, a nd Pillard, Circuit Ju dges 

## UN DERSEA L OP INIO N NO T AVAILA BLE TO P UB LIC
# C_2023205EN.01001801.xml

| 12.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 205/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 205/18

---

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 20 April 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny — Poland) — Dyrektor Krajowej Informacji Skarbowej v P. in W.

(Case C-282/22, (1) Dyrektor Krajowej Informacji Skarbowej)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Taxation - Value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Articles 14, 15 and 24 - Recharging points for electric vehicles - Provision of devices for recharging electric vehicles, supply of the necessary electricity, and provision of technical support and IT services - Classification as a ‘supply of goods’ or a ‘supply of services’)

(2023/C 205/21)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant in cassation: Dyrektor Krajowej Informacji Skarbowej

Respondent in cassation: P. in W.

Interested party: Rzecznik Małych i Średnich Przedsiębiorców

Operative part of the judgment

Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, as amended by Council Directive 2009/162/EU of 22 December 2009,

must be interpreted as meaning that a single complex supply which encompasses:

| — | access to recharging devices for electric vehicles (including integration of the charger with the vehicle operating system); |
| --- | --- |

—

access to recharging devices for electric vehicles (including integration of the charger with the vehicle operating system);

| — | the supply of electricity, within duly adjusted parameters, to the batteries of that vehicle; |
| --- | --- |

—

the supply of electricity, within duly adjusted parameters, to the batteries of that vehicle;

| — | the necessary technical support for the users concerned; and |
| --- | --- |

—

the necessary technical support for the users concerned; and

| — | the provision of IT applications enabling the user concerned to reserve a connector, view his or her transaction history, and purchase credits which are then accumulated in an e-wallet and used to pay for recharging sessions |
| --- | --- |

—

the provision of IT applications enabling the user concerned to reserve a connector, view his or her transaction history, and purchase credits which are then accumulated in an e-wallet and used to pay for recharging sessions

constitutes a ‘supply of goods’ within the meaning of Article 14(1) of Directive 2006/112, as amended.

---

(1)  OJ C 326, 29.8.2022.

---
EX-10.13



 Exhibit 10.13 
  

			
	



	 	 Arista Networks, Inc

5470 Great America Pkwy
 Santa Clara,
CA 95054


 Marc Stoll 
 October 3, 2013

 Dear Marc: 
 Arista Networks, Inc. (the “Company”)
is pleased to offer you a position as a member of the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) effective upon formal approval by the Board. What follows is information on some of the benefits available to you as a director of the
Company (a “Director”). 
 As compensation for your services to the Company, you will be granted a stock option to purchase 30,000 shares of
Arista Networks Inc common stock, which will vest over 5 years at the rate of 1/60 each month, subject to your continued service as a Director of the Company on the applicable vesting date. If the Company were to get acquired, your unvested shares
will fully vest. The stock option is subject to the terms and conditions of the Company’s 2011 Equity Incentive Plan and grant agreements, which are incorporated herein by reference. 

The Company will also reimburse you for all reasonable expenses incurred by you in connection with your services to the Company. All reimbursements are in
accordance with established Company policies. 
 Board meetings are generally held on site at the Company quarterly and we would hope that your schedule
would permit you to attend all of the meetings. In addition, there may be telephonic calls to address special projects that arise from time to time. The Board has also delegated certain duties to committees on which you may be asked to serve. 

Nothing in this offer or the stock option agreement should be construed to interfere with or otherwise restrict in any way the rights of the Company and the
Company’s stockholders to remove any individual from the Board at any time in accordance with the provisions of applicable law. 
 This letter sets
forth the terms of your service as a Director with the Company and supersedes any prior representations or agreements, whether written or oral. This letter may not be modified or amended except by a written agreement, signed by an officer of the
Company and by you. 
 We hope that you find the foregoing terms acceptable. You may indicate your agreement with these terms and accept this offer by
signing and dating both copies and and returning the original letter to me. 
 Marc, I am looking forward to you joining the Company’s Board of
Directors. I believe you will make a significant contribution to the Company and its future direction. 
 Sincerely, 

/s/ Andreas Bechtolsheim 
 Andreas Bechtolsheim, Chairman 

ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO, this 10/3/13 
  

	
	/s/ Marc Stoll
	Marc Stoll
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 28, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40127

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE CONTRERAS-JIMENEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:05-CR-587-ALL 

--------------------

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jose Contreras-Jimenez (Contreras) appeals following his

guilty-plea conviction on one count of illegally reentering the

United States after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. 

Contreras argues that the district court misapplied the

Sentencing Guidelines by characterizing his state felony

conviction for possession of a controlled substance as an

“aggravated felony” for purposes of U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(C). 

Contreras’s argument is unavailing in light of circuit precedent. 
No. 06-40127

-2-

See United States v. Hinojosa-Lopez, 130 F.3d 691, 693-94 (5th

Cir. 1997). Contreras argues that this circuit’s precedent is

inconsistent with Jerome v. United States, 318 U.S. 101 (1943). 

Having preceded Hinojosa-Lopez, Jerome is not “an intervening

Supreme Court case explicitly or implicitly overruling that prior

precedent.” See United States v. Short, 181 F.3d 620, 624 (5th

Cir. 1999).

For the first time on appeal, Contreras challenges the

constitutionality of § 1326(b) in light of Apprendi v. New

Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). Contreras’s constitutional

challenge is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States,

523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). Although Contreras contends that

Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly decided and that a majority of

the Supreme Court would overrule Almendarez-Torres in light of

Apprendi, we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis

that Almendarez-Torres remains binding. See United States v.

Garza-Lopez, 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied,

126 S. Ct. 298 (2005). Contreras properly concedes that his

argument is foreclosed in light of Almendarez-Torres and circuit

precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further

review.

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 46 (Monday, March 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10877-10878]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5782]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act Review 
Committee: Meeting--Revised Notice

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Notice is hereby given in accordance with the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (FACA), 5 U.S.C. Appendix (1988), that a meeting of the 
Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) Review 
Committee will be held on March 25-27, 1997 in Norman, OK.
    The Review Committee will meet at the Oklahoma Center for 
Continuing Education (OCCE) on the campus of the University of Oklahoma 
in Norman. Meetings will begin each day at 8:30 a.m. and conclude not 
later than 5:00 p.m.
    The Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act Review 
Committee was established by Public Law 101-601 to monitor, review, and 
assist in implementation of the inventory and identification process 
and repatriation activities required under the statute.
    This notice amends the meeting agenda to include presentation of 
additional information regarding a dispute over the disposition of a 
carved wooden figure from Hawaii in the possession of the City of 
Providence and preparation of the committee's 1995-1996 report to 
Congress. The agenda will also include discussion of the compliance by 
Federal agencies, implementation of the statute in the States of 
Oklahoma and Texas, and the disposition of culturally unidentifiable 
human remains.
    This meeting will be open to the public. However, facilities and 
space for accommodating the public are limited. Any member of the 
public may file a written statement concerning the matters to be 
discussed with Dr. Francis P. McManamon, Departmental Consulting 
Archeologist.
    Persons wishing further information concerning this meeting, or who 
wish to submit written statements may contact Dr. Francis P. McManamon, 
Departmental Consulting Archeologist, Archeology and Ethnography 
Program (MS 2275), National Park Service, P.O.

[[Page 10878]]

Box 37127, Washington, DC 20013-7127; telephone: (202) 343-4101. Draft 
summary minutes of the meeting will be available for public inspection 
approximately eight weeks after the meeting at the office of the 
Departmental Consulting Archeologist, 800 North Capitol St. NW, Suite 
210, Washington, DC.

    Dated: February 26, 1997.
Francis P. McManamon,
Departmental Consulting Archeologist, Manager, Archeology and 
Ethnography Program.
[FR Doc. 97-5782 Filed 3-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for approval, pursuant to the Home Owners' Loan Act (12 U.S.C. 1461*et seq.*) (HOLA), Regulation LL (12 CFR part 238), and Regulation MM (12 CFR part 239), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to become a savings and loan holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a savings association.                

                    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of Information Office at                     *https://www.federalreserve.gov/​foia/​request.htm.*                     Interested persons may express their views in writing on whether the proposed transaction complies with the standards enumerated in the HOLA (12 U.S.C. 1467a(e)).                

Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than May 9, 2022.

*A. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston*                     (Prabal Chakrabarti, Senior Vice President) 600 Atlantic Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02210-2204. Comments can also be sent electronically to                     *BOS.SRC.Applications.Comments@bos.frb.org:*

                    1.                     *Ion Financial, MHC, Naugatuck, Connecticut;*                     to merge with Lincoln Park Bancorp, and thereby indirectly acquire Lincoln 1st Bank, both of Pine Brook, New Jersey.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 4, 2022.

Ann E. Misback,

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2022-07434 Filed 4-6-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
# C_2021148EN.01002601.xml

| 26.4.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.4.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/26

---

Action brought on 3 March 2021 — Telefónica Germany v EUIPO (LOOP)

(Case T-132/21)

(2021/C 148/36)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Telefónica Germany GmbH & Co. OHG (Munich, Germany) (represented by: A. Fottner and M. Müller, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark LOOP — Application for registration No 18 008 477

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 17 December 2020 in Case R 644/2020-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision in so far as it rejected the EU trade mark registration application No 18008477; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision in so far as it rejected the EU trade mark registration application No 18008477;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs incurred in the proceedings before the General Court and the costs incurred during the appeal and examination procedures before EUIPO. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs incurred in the proceedings before the General Court and the costs incurred during the appeal and examination procedures before EUIPO.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council, of Article 41(2)(c) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and of Article 41(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights in conjunction with Article 20 and Article 21(1) thereof. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council, of Article 41(2)(c) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and of Article 41(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights in conjunction with Article 20 and Article 21(1) thereof.

---
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 52

Urging that the railroad industry, including rail labor, management and

retiree organizations, open discussions for adequately funding an amendment to the Railroad Retirement Act of 1974 to modify the guaranteed

minimum benefit for widows and widowers whose annuities are converted

from a spouse to a widow or widower annuity.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 20, 1997

Mr. QUINN (for himself, Mr. LATOURETTE, Mr. FOGLIETTA, Mr. RAHALL,

Mr. LUCAS of Oklahoma, Mr. FLAKE, Mr. LIPINSKI, Mr. KLINK, Mr.

DOYLE, Mr. KLECZKA, Ms. DANNER, Mr. VENTO, and Mr. KUCINICH)

submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Urging that the railroad industry, including rail labor, management and retiree organizations, open discussions for

adequately funding an amendment to the Railroad Retirement Act of 1974 to modify the guaranteed minimum

benefit for widows and widowers whose annuities are

converted from a spouse to a widow or widower annuity.

Whereas, for years, many in the railroad industry have argued that annuities paid to widows and widowers under

the Railroad Retirement Act of 1974 are inadequate;
2

•HCON 52 IH

Whereas during the lifetime of the employee and the spouse,

the employee receives a full annuity and so does the

spouse;

Whereas, however, after the employee’s death, only a widow’s

or widower’s annuity is payable, which under current law

is no less than that widow or widower received as a

spouse in the month before the employee’s death;

Whereas this widow’s or widower’s annuity is often found inadequate and leaves the survivor with less than the

amount of income needed to meet ordinary and necessary

living expenses; and

Whereas no outside contributions from the American taxpayer are needed, and any changes will be paid for from

within the railroad industry itself: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That—

3 (1) the Congress of the United States recog4 nizes the concern of many in the railroad industry

5 that the spousal annuity under the current system

6 is inadequate and often leaves the survivor with less

7 than the amount of income needed to meet ordinary

8 and necessary living expenses;

9 (2) the Congress of the United States also rec10 ognizes that a process of dialogue must take place

11 among all parties of the railroad community includ12 ing rail labor, management and retiree organizations

13 before railroad annuity legislation can be enacted;

14 and
3

•HCON 52 IH

1 (3) because of the self-sufficient and unique na2 ture of the Railroad Retirement System, Congress

3 urges and exhorts all parties of the railroad commu4 nity, including rail labor, management and retiree

5 organizations to find a suitable way to fund an

6 amendment that would improve the survivor benefits

7 component to the Railroad Retirement Act of 1974.

Æ