alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 

     [LETTERHEAD FOR NAIL MCKINNEY PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION APPEARS HERE]

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

Pontotoc Bancshares Corp.
P.O. Box 29
Pontotoc, Mississippi 38863


                                                April 23, 1996


We consent to the use of the audited financial statements for the year ended 
December 31, 1996, the compiled financial statements for the year ended December
31, 1995, and the pro forma financial statements for the year ended December 31,
1996 together with our reports thereon dated April 9, 1997 in the registration 
statement on Form S-4 of Pontotoc BancShares Corp.


Very truly yours,

/s/ JAMES RAY DAVIS, JR.

James Ray Davis, Jr.
Certified Public Accountant
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 23
----------

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
PGI, Incorporated and subsidiaries on Form S-8 (File 2-77149) of our report
dated February 5, 2003 on the consolidated statement of financial position of
PGI, Incorporated and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and 2001 and
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' deficiency and cash flows
for the two years ended December 31, 2002. Our report contains an explanatory
paragraph regarding uncertainty as to the ability of the Company to continue as
a going concern.


St. Louis, Missouri                               /s/ BKDLLP
March 31, 2003
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 47 (Tuesday, March 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 11150]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5970]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Indiana Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting of 
the Indiana Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 1:00 
p.m. and adjourn at 5:00 p.m. on Thursday, March 27, 1997, at the South 
Bend Public Library, 304 South Main Street, South Bend, Indiana 44601. 
The purpose of the meeting is to discuss civil rights issues of 
interest and plan future activities.
    Persons desiring additional information, or planning a presentation 
to the Committee, should contact Committee Chairperson Paul Chase, 317-
920-3190, or Constance Davis, Director of the Midwestern Regional 
Office, 312-353-8311 (TDD 312-353-8362). Hearing-impaired persons who 
will attend the meeting and require the services of a sign language 
interpreter should contact the Regional Office at least five (5) 
working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission.

    Dated at Washington, DC, March 3, 1997.
Carol-Lee Hurley,
Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 97-5970 Filed 3-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
ex10-3.htm


Exhibit 10.3


 


AMENDMENT TO THE OPTION AGREEMENT


 


effective as of the 31st day of January, 2013


 


BETWEEN:


 


Viscount Nevada Holdings Ltd., with a resident agent address at


 


1000 East William Street, Suite 204, Carson City, Nevada  89701


 







(the "Optionor")


 


AND:


 


Nevada Tungsten Holdings Ltd., with an office at


 


1671 Southwest 105, Davie FL 33324







(the "Optionee")







 


The parties agree that notwithstanding that the payment contemplated in section 4 (b) (i) US$150,000 due to the Optionor on or before February 15, 2013, that was not made on or before February 15, 2013 that the agreement remains unchanged, is in good standing with full force and effect, with the understanding that the payment contemplated in 4 (b) (i) of the US$150,000 due to the Optionor on February 15, 2013, is currently outstanding and will be made on or before April 15, 2013.


 


Dated this 28 day of February 2013.


 







SIGNED AND DELIVERED BY







Viscount Nevada Holdings Ltd.


 







Per:                   


Authorized Signatory


 







SIGNED AND DELIVERED BY







Nevada Tungsten Holdings Ltd.







 



Per:                   


Authorized Signatory
No. 11-10267.

#### Stevens *v.*Martel, Acting Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8758 

To direct the Comptroller General of the United States to submit a report 

on changes in the use of the beneficiary travel program of the Department of Veterans Affairs during COVID–19, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 17, 2020 

Ms. ADAMS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To direct the Comptroller General of the United States to 

submit a report on changes in the use of the beneficiary 

travel program of the Department of Veterans Affairs 

during COVID–19, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Studying Veterans Ac5 cess to Care During COVID–19 Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8758 IH

1 SEC. 2. COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORT ON CHANGES IN 

2 USE OF BENEFICIARY TRAVEL PROGRAM OF 

3 DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS. 

4 (a) REPORT.—Not later than one year after the date 

5 of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of 

6 the United States shall prepare and submit to the Com7 mittees on Veterans’ Affairs of the House of Representa8 tives and the Senate a report on the following: 

9 (1) The year-over-year change in the number of 

10 payments and allowances provided pursuant to the 

11 beneficiary travel program of the Department of 

12 Veterans Affairs under section 111 of title 38, 

13 United States Code during the COVID–19 public 

14 health emergency period. 

15 (2) The year-over-year change in the total dol16 lar amount of payments and allowances provided 

17 pursuant to such program during such period. 

18 (3) The anticipated costs associated with ex19 panding eligibility to receive payments and allow20 ances pursuant to such program to veterans whose 

21 total annual income is below 400 percent of the pov22 erty line. 

23 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section— 

24 (1) The term ‘‘COVID–19 public health emer25 gency period’’ means the period during which there 

26 exists the public health emergency declared by the 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 8758 IH

1 Secretary of Health and Human Services pursuant 

2 to section 319 of the Public Health Service Act (42 

3 U.S.C. 247d) on January 31, 2020, entitled ‘‘Deter4 mination that a Public Health Emergency Exists 

5 Nationwide as the Result of the 2019 Novel 

6 Coronavirus’’ (including any renewal of such dec7 laration pursuant to such section). 

8 (2) The term ‘‘poverty line’’ has the meaning 

9 given such term in section 673 of the Community 

10 Services Block Grant Act (42 U.S.C. 9902). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### IN RE: Charles E. SMITH, Petitioner

No. 18-1003

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P. March 9, 2018

(Opinion filed: March 14, 2018)

Charles E. Smith, Pro Se

District Attorney Dauphin County, Dauphin County Office of District Attorney, Harrisburg, PA, for Respondent

Before: RESTREPO, BIBAS and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges

OPINION *

PER CURIAM

In July 2016, Charles E. Smith filed a petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania. By order and memorandum entered on December 8, 2016, the District Court dismissed Smith’s § 2254 petition without prejudice because there were ongoing state court proceedings, and declined to issue a certificate of appealability. Smith has filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a supplemental petition for writ of mandamus asking us to direct the District Court and the Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas to grant him relief. Smith has also filed motions to proceed in forma pauperis and to be relieved from the obligation to supply an inmate account statement.

Smith’s motions to proceed in forma pauperis and to be relieved from the obligation to supply an inmate account statement are granted. For the reasons set forth below, we will deny the petition for mandamus.

Mandamus is a drastic remedy that is granted in only extraordinary cases. In re Diet Drugs Prods. Liab. Litig., 418 F.3d 372, 378 (3d Cir. 2005). Petitioners must establish that they have “no other adequate means” to obtain the relief requested, and that they have a “clear and indisputable” right to issuance of the writ. Madden v. Myers, 102 F.3d 74, 79 (3d Cir. 1996). Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal. See In re Diet Drugs Prods. Liab. Litig., 418 F.3d at 378-79.

To the extent that Smith asks us to order the District Court to rule on his § 2254 petition, he has already received the relief that he requested. To the extent that Smith challenges the handling of his case in the Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas, we typically lack mandamus jurisdiction over state courts. See White v. Ward, 145 F.3d 1139, 1140 (10th Cir. 1998) (per curiam) (explaining that a federal court “lack[s] jurisdiction to direct a state court to perform its duty”). To the extent that he is trying to appeal the dismissal of his § 2254 petition, mandamus is not a *203substitute for appeal. See In re Diet Drugs Prods. Liab. Litig., 418 F.3d at 378-79. Finally, to the extent that he is trying to raise new habeas claims, they should be raised in a § 2254 petition. Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 500, 93 S.Ct. 1827, 36 L.Ed.2d 439 (1973).

Accordingly, we will deny Smith’s petition.

*

 This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not constitute binding precedent.
<PAGE>



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                              OMB APPROVAL
                                                        OMB Number: 3235-0060
                                                        Expires: March 31, 2003
                                                        Estimated average burden
                                                        hours per response: 1.25


                                  UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                              Washington, DC 20549

                                    FORM 8-K
                                 CURRENT REPORT

     Pursuant to Section 13 OR 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported) December 9, 2002

                                   CYNET, INC.
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its chapter)

             Texas                      000-28349                76-0467099
 (State or other jurisdiction          (Commission              (IRS Employer
       of incorporation)               File Number)          Identification No.)

             12777 Jones Road, Suite 400
                   Houston, Texas                                    77070
      (Address of principal executive offices)                     (Zip Code)


Registrant's telephone number, including area code (866) 281-9403

           ----------------------------------------------------------
          (Former name or former address, if changed since last report)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<PAGE>




ITEM 3. Bankruptcy or Receivership

On December 9, 2002, Cynet, Inc. (the "Company") filed a voluntary petition to
reorganize under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Southern District of Texas (Cause No. 02-44686-H1-11; In The
United States Bankruptcy Court For The Southern District of Texas, Houston
Division, the "Petition"). The Company has not submitted a Plan of
Reorganization at this time.

                                   SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.


                                        /s/ Samuel C. Beale
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                        Cynet, Inc.

                                        /s/ Samuel C. Beale
                                        --------------------------------------
Date   December 26, 2002                Samuel C. Beale
                                        Vice President, General Counsel
                                         and Secretary
No. 11-10308.

#### Wilson *v.*McLaughlin, Warden.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of UST Liquidating Corporation. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Marc A. Weisman, Co-Chairman of Board of Directors of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.
 /s/ Marc A. Weisman
Marc A. Weisman
Co-Chairman of Board of Directors
February 23, 2004
# C_2022207EN.01001801.xml

| 23.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 207/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 207/18

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio (Italy) lodged on 25 February 2022 — BM, NP v Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca

(Case C-132/22)

(2022/C 207/25)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: BM, NP

Defendant: Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca

Question referred

Must Article 45(1) and (2) TFEU and Article 3(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 (1) be interpreted as precluding a rule, such as that laid down in Article 1(655) of Law No 205/2017, according to which, in order to take part in the procedure for inclusion on the lists compiled for the award of permanent and temporary teaching contracts in Italian AFAM institutions, professional experience gained by candidates at those national institutions alone is taken into account, and not experience gained at peer institutions in other European countries, given that the procedure in question is specifically intended to counter the phenomenon of precarious employment in Italy? If the Court of Justice does not hold the Italian legislation to be contrary, in abstract terms, to the European regulatory framework, can the measures envisaged by that legislation be regarded as proportionate, in concrete terms, in view of the abovementioned public-interest objective?

---

(1)  Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on freedom of movement for workers within the Union (OJ 2011 L 141, p. 1).

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Marine Mammal Commission

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Brady O'Donnell or Hannah Wellman, Marine Mammal Commission, 4340 East West Highway, Room 700, Bethesda, MD 20814; (301) 504-0087; email:                         *mmc@mmc.gov.*

Peter O. Thomas,

Executive Director.

[FR Doc. 2022-06782 Filed 3-28-22; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6820-31-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE QUARTERLY
REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB FOR THE FISCAL QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         150,984
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         782,373
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               775,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  2,120,166
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         1,023,897
<LOANS>                                     13,949,537
<ALLOWANCE>                                  (128,417)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,267,991
<DEPOSITS>                                  10,006,632
<SHORT-TERM>                                 1,000,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            350,591
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            4,933
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,520,527
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              19,267,991
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                337,244
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               74,292
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               411,536
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             115,765
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             123,865
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          287,671
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                132,109
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                161,330
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     161,330
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                     (69,500)
<NET-INCOME>                                    91,830
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             (128,417)
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            (128,417)
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         (128,417)
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-50480

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ALEJANDRO ESPINOZA-HERNANDEZ, also known as Alejandro 

Espinozahernandez, also known as Alejandro Espinoza Hernandez, also 

known as Alex Espinoza, also known as Alex Espinosa, also known as 

Alejandro Espinoza, also known as Alejandro Hernandez-Espinoza, also 

known as Alejandro Espinzoa Hernandez,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 5:19-CR-37-1

Before JOLLY, JONES, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Alejandro Espinoza-Hernandez appeals his conviction for illegal reentry 

into the United States. He challenges the district court’s denial of his motion 

to dismiss the indictment, arguing that it was invalid because the notice to 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 8, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 19-50480 Document: 00515150829 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/08/2019
No. 19-50480

2

appear in his removal proceedings was defective because it did not specify a 

time and date for his removal hearing and that the removal order was thus 

void. He concedes that this challenge is foreclosed by United States v. PedrozaRocha, 933 F.3d 490 (5th Cir. 2019), but he wishes to preserve it for further 

review. The Government has filed an unopposed motion for summary 

affirmance, agreeing that the issue is foreclosed under Pedroza-Rocha. 

Alternately, the Government requests an extension of time to file its brief.

Summary affirmance is appropriate if “the position of one of the parties 

is clearly right as a matter of law so that there can be no substantial question 

as to the outcome of the case.” Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis, 406 F.2d 1158, 

1162 (5th Cir. 1969). Pedroza-Rocha concluded that the notice to appear was 

not deficient because it did not specify a date for the hearing, that any such 

alleged deficiency had not deprived the immigration court of jurisdiction, and 

that Pedroza-Rocha could not collaterally attack his notice to appear without 

first exhausting his administrative remedies. 933 F.3d at 496–98. EspinozaHernandez’s arguments are, as he concedes, foreclosed by this case. See id. 

Accordingly, the Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, 

the Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is 

DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

 Case: 19-50480 Document: 00515150829 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/08/2019
1,800

6,498

8,298

BallotsCounted

558

157

715

BallotsRejected

ALASKA

Mail,Fax,Email

Election/Registrar's

Office

Internet

DM

V

Public

Assistance

Office

DisabilitiesAgency

Military

RecruitmentOffice

OtherState

Agency

RegistrationDrives

Registration:Other

48,247

98,486

32,554

70,837

6,626

215 1,824 438 0 0

RegistrationFormSource

TotalRegisteredVoters

587,303

SectionA-VoterRegistration

RegistrationFormsReceived

259,227

ConfirmationNotificationsSent

24,835

Polling

Place

UOCAVA Absentee Provisional

Ballot

EarlyVote

Center

Voteby

Mail

Turnout:

Other

199,518

27,626

19,822

67,309

9,013

0 0

SectionF-TurnoutbyMethod

CountedFull Counted

Part

Rejected Provisional:

Other

14,274

5,277

271 0

SectionE-ProvisionalBallots

UniformedService

Non-militaryOverseas

Other

SectionB-UOCAVA

7,587

2,087

9,674

BallotsTransmitted

TOTAL TOTAL

ProvisionalBallotTotal:19,822 TurnoutTotal:323,288

Select: ALASKA

TOTAL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                          

  

2016EAVSDataBrief 

U i