alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     
  The Schedule contains summary financial information extracted 
from the financial statements for Liberty Tax Credit Plus L.P.  
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial 
statements                                                      
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000818020                   
<NAME>                        Liberty Tax Credit Plus L.P. 
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               MAR-15-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                  MAR-16-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                    DEC-15-1997
<CASH>                                           12,784,147
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       643,954
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1,439,590
<PP&E>                                          255,452,720
<DEPRECIATION>                                   78,498,820
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  195,434,635
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            27,132,883
<BONDS>                                         157,014,177
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                  0
<OTHER-SE>                                       11,287,575
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    195,434,635
<SALES>                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 26,200,465
<CGS>                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 22,544,743
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                9,840,625
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (6,184,903)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     693,340
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (5,491,563)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (324.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0
        
                                                 

</TABLE>
May 14, 2015

Memo to Docket EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 2011

- 0817

SUBJECT: Meeting with the PCA

A meeting was held May 7, 2015 with the Portland Cement Association (PCA) members to discuss the delay of the promulgation of Performance Specification 18 and the delay of National Institute for Standards Technology (NIST) calibration gases , which are needed to help quality assure control process mechanisms related to continuous monitoring of controls for release of hydrochloric acid and mercury.

In attendance were:

EPA:

Sh aron Nizich Steve Fruh Steffan Johnson Robin Segall Ray Merrill Candace Sorrell Keith Barnett Ann Johnson

Argos: Bill Voshell

Lehigh: Tim Matz

Buzzi Unicem USA: Adam Swercheck

Cemex: Satish Sheth

EMZ: Jim Peeler

AEMS: John Holmes

Ash Grove: Curtis Leslie

PCA: Tom Harman and Todd Johnston

X: Bryan Gasiorowsky , LaFarge

Saltriner Group: Brad Linsey
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 884 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 884

    To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for 
   treatment of clinical psychologists as physicians for purposes of 
 furnishing clinical psychologist services under the Medicare program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 30, 2019

  Ms. Judy Chu of California (for herself, Mr. Smith of Missouri, Ms. 
 Schakowsky, and Mr. Mullin) introduced the following bill; which was 
 referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to 
   the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for 
   treatment of clinical psychologists as physicians for purposes of 
 furnishing clinical psychologist services under the Medicare program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medicare Mental Health Access Act''.

SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGISTS AS PHYSICIANS FOR PURPOSES 
              OF FURNISHING CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGIST SERVICES.

    (a) In General.--The first sentence of section 1861(r) of the 
Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(r)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``or'' before ``(5)''; and
            (2) by inserting before the period the following: ``, or 
        (6) a clinical psychologist, but only with respect to the 
        furnishing of qualified psychologist services described in 
        subsection (ii) for which the psychologist is legally 
        authorized to perform by the State and who is acting within the 
        scope of the psychologist's license (or other authorization 
        under State law)''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to items and services furnished on or after January 1, 2020.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21 - 0480 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. DAVID JOEL EATON,

Defendant and Appellant.

**GRANT** Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the Appellant is given an extension of time until April 12 , 202 3, to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s reply brief. No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 2 2023

03/02/2023

Case Number: DA 21-0480
# C_2023179EN.01001401.xml

| 22.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/14

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Alba Iulia (Romania) lodged on 29 December 2022 — Biohemp Concept Srl v Direcția pentru Agricultură Județeană Alba

(Case C-793/22, Biohemp Concept)

(2023/C 179/22)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Curtea de Apel Alba Iulia

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant and applicant at first instance: Biohemp Concept Srl

Respondent and defendant at first instance: Direcția pentru Agricultură Județeană Alba

Question referred

Must Regulations Nos 1307/2013 (1) and 1308/2013 (2) and Articles 35, 36 and 38 TFEU be interpreted as precluding national legislation in so far as it prohibits the cultivation of hemp (Cannabis sativa) in hydroponic systems in indoor environments prepared for that purpose?

---

(1)  Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing rules for direct payments to farmers under support schemes within the framework of the common agricultural policy and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 637/2008 and Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 (OJ 2013 L 347, p. 608).

(2)  Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (OJ 2013 L 347, p. 671).

---
#### HUSTEEL CO., LTD., ILJIN Steel Corporation, AJU Besteel Co., Ltd., SeAH Steel Corp., Plaintiffs Hyundai Steel Company, FKA Hyundai Hysco, Plaintiff-Appellee Nexteel Co., Ltd., Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES, Boomerang Tube LLC, Energex Tube (a Division of JMC Steel Group), Tejas Tubular Products, TMK IPSCO, Vallourec Star, L.P., Welded Tube USA Inc., Defendants-Appellees Maverick Tube Corporation, United States Steel Corporation, Defendants-Cross-Appellants

2016-2732, 2017-1013, 2017-1014

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

February 7, 2018

Jaehong David Park, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Plaintiff-appellant and plaintiff-appellee also represented by Henry David Almond, Sylvia Y. Chen, Daniel Robert Wilson; Andrew Mercer Treaster, Denver, Co.

Hardeep Kaur Josan, International Trade Field Office, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, New York, NY, argued for defendant-appellee United States. Also represented by Chad A. Readler, Jeanne E. Davidson, Claudia Burke; Myk-haylo Gryzlov, Office of the Assistant Chief Counsel for Trade Enforcement and Compliance, United States Department of Commerce, Washington, DC.

Robert E. Defrancesco, ' III, Wiley Rein, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-cross-appellant Maverick Tube Corporation. Also represented by Alan H. Price, Laura El-Sabaawi, Jeffrey Owen Frank, Adam Milan Teslik.

Roger Brian Schagrin, Schagrin Associates, Washington, DC, for defendants-ap-pellees Boomerang Tube LLC, Energex Tube, Tejas Tubular Products, TMK IP-SCO, Vallourec Star, L.P., Welded Tube USA Inc. • Also represented by John W. Bohn, Christopher Cloutier, Paul Wright Jameson.

Debbie Leilani Shon, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Washington, DC, for defendant-cross-appellant United States Steel Corporation. Also represented by Josef Ansorge, Jonathan Gordon Cooper, Jon David Corey, Kelsey Rule.

*891Per Curiam

JUDGMENT

(Moore, Mayer, and Stoll, Circuit Judges).

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
September 13, 2012

No. 12-55.

#### Fisher, Individually and as Successor in Interest to Decedent Fisher, et al. *v.*Halliburton et al.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari dismissed as to petitioners James Blackwood and Joann Blackwood under this Court’s Rule 46.2.
# C_2023286EN.01002403.xml

| 14.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 286/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 286/24

---

Order of the President of the Court of 18 April 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Koblenz — Germany) — BZ v DKV Deutsche Krankenversicherung AG

(Case C-672/22, (1) DKV)

(2023/C 286/31)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 45, 6.2.2023.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           3,087
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,472
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,025
<PP&E>                                          89,598
<DEPRECIATION>                                (32,703)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  69,525
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,718
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            92
<OTHER-SE>                                      47,388
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    69,525
<SALES>                                          6,184
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,211
<CGS>                                            4,252
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,230
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   690
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 288
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    981
<INCOME-TAX>                                       363
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                618
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       618
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.07
        

</TABLE>
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Application Under the Equal Access

to Justice Act of-- Environmental Safety Consultants, Inc. Under Contract No. N62470-95-C-2399 APPEARANCE FORTHE APPELLANT: ) ) ) ) ) )

APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 51722

Mr. Peter C. Nwogu

President Ronald J. Borro, Esq.

Navy ChiefTrial Attorney Ellen M. Evans, Esq.

Senior Trial Attorney OPINION BYADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE FREEMAN ON MOTION FORCLARIFICATION AND/OR EVIDENTIARY HEARING By letter dated 23 December 2013, Environmental Safety Consultants, Inc. (ESCI) filed a "motion for clarification and/or evidentiary hearing" regarding the Board's 3 December 2013 Reconsideration ofDenial ofan Equal Access to Justice Act Award. Our 3 December 2013 decision affirmed on reconsideration the Board's 26 June 2013 denial ofESCI's application for an award offees and expenses pursuantto the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 5 U.S.C. § 504. EnvironmentalSafety Consultants, Inc., ASBCA No. 51722, 13 BCA**~** 35,352. Although titled as a motion for clarification, we interpret ESCI's motion as one for reconsideration. ESCI is not entitled to reconsideration ofa reconsideration decision. EnvironmentalSafety Consultants, Inc., ASBCA No. 53485, 06-1 BCA**~** 33,122. ESCI's motion is dismissed and the Recorder is instructed not to accept any further filings by ESCI relative to this EAJA application. Dated: 28 January 2014

# l~~r¥- MONROE E. FREEMAN)R" 

# I Administrative Judge Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals (Signatures continued)I concur

Administrative Judge Acting Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Opinion and Decision ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals on an application for fees and other expenses incurred in connection with ASBCANo. 51722, Appeal ofEnvironmental Safety Consultants, Inc., rendered in accordance with 5 U.S.C. § 504. Dated:

2 JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
March 23 , 2015

Mr. Stephen Nally

13224 Cain Lane

Louisville, KY 40245

Dear Mr. Nally :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It

explains why we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can n o t Process Your Request

We entered your J anuary 26 , 2015 exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA

- 20 15

-

0213 ) , but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does

not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request

any further, you must send us all of the following:

• The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief and th e extent of

the relief you seek

.

• The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

• The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect saf ety or how the exemption

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you

seek an exemption.

• Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

W hat You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9521

.

Sincerely,

/s/

Jake Troutman

Program Analyst , Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
# C_2023112EN.01002301.xml

| 27.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/23

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille (France) lodged on 16 December 2022 — Procureur de la République v OP

(Case C-763/22)

(2023/C 112/29)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Procureur de la République

Defendant: OP

Question referred

Does Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States (1) preclude the legislation of a Member State from granting a governmental authority the power to decide, between a European arrest warrant and a concurrent extradition request issued by a third country, which of the two is to be executed, without any possibility of legal remedy?

---

(1)  OJ 2002 L 190, p. 1.

---
### UNITED STATES NAVY

- MARINE CORPS

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Before

J. R. MCFARLANE, M.C. HOLIFIELD, D.A. NORKIN

Appellate Military Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

ROBERT C. MORIARTY

ELECTRONICS TECHNICIAN FIRST CLASS (E

- 6), U. S. NAVY

NMCCA 201400182

SPECIAL COURT

- MARTIAL

Sentence Adjudged: 4 March 2014

. Military Judge: Col D.J. Daugherty, USMC

. Convening Authority: Commandant, Naval District Washington,

Washington Navy Yard, Washington, DC.

Staff Judge Advocate's Recommen dation: L CDR J.D. Pilling,

JAGC , USN

. For Appellant: CAPT Charles D. Stimson, JAGC, USN.

For Appellee: Mr. Brian K. Keller , Esq

.

14 August 2014

---------------------------------------------------

OPINION OF THE COURT

------------------------------- --------------------

After careful consideration of the record, submitted

without assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence

as approved by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform

Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         248,921
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  376,251
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    240,079
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,016,755
<PP&E>                                       7,042,413
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,069,571)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,471,886
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          742,442
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       644,421
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,837,384
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,471,886
<SALES>                                      3,091,463
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,091,463
<CGS>                                        2,669,882
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,669,882
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,135,780
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             130,844
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (951,683)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (951,683)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (951,683)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.26)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2



     CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350


I, Howard L. Flanders, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
All American Semiconductor, Inc., hereby certify, to my knowledge:

          (1)  that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of All American
               Semiconductor, Inc. for the quarterly period ended on September
               30, 2005 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
               date hereof at File No. 0-16207 (the "Report") fully complies
               with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,
               of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
               all material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of All American Semiconductor, Inc.

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.




Date:  November 10, 2005            /s/ HOWARD L. FLANDERS
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Howard L. Flanders
                                    Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
                                      Officer