alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACED FROM ITEM 1 OF
FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       3,760,041
<SECURITIES>                                35,661,446
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            40,055,576
<PP&E>                                      10,184,506
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,175,143
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              46,182,447
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,800,695
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        50,722
<OTHER-SE>                                  43,331,030
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                43,381,752
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,608,837
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,592,161
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (7,983,324)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (7,983,324)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (7,983,324)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.39)
        

</TABLE>
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8549 

To prohibit the retention of incidentally acquired communications in the 

course of intelligence collection activities. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 9, 2020 

Mr. AMASH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Permanent 

Select Committee on Intelligence 

A BILL 

To prohibit the retention of incidentally acquired communications in the course of intelligence collection activities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION OF RETENTION OF INCIDEN4 TALLY ACQUIRED COMMUNICATIONS IN THE 

5 COURSE OF INTELLIGENCE COLLECTION AC6 TIVITIES. 

7 Section 309(b)(3)(A) of the Intelligence Authoriza8 tion Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (50 U.S.C. 1813) is amend9 ed by striking ‘‘and shall permit the acquisition, retention, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8549 IH

1 and dissemination of covered communications subject to 

2 the limitation in subparagraph (B)’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
#### MEERHOFF, C. v. MCCRAY, D.

1392 WDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

9/29/2017

Docket No. 11079-2015

(Erie)

Affirmed
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarter report on Form 10-Q of National Housing Trust Limited Partnership (the Partnership) for the period ending June
30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James A. Bowman, Chief Executive Officer of NHT, Inc. the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |    |  |                                           
|-------------------- |  | -- |  | ------------------------------------------
|Date August 23, 2004 |  | By |  | /s/ James A. Bowman                       
|                     |  |    |  | James A. Bowman,                          
|                     |  |    |  | President and Chief Executive Officer     
|                     |  |    |  | NHT, Inc., General Partner for            
|                     |  |    |  | National Housing Trust Limited Partnership
# C_2022408EN.01002702.xml

| 24.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 408/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 408/27

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 28 June 2022 — Criminal proceedings against VB

(Case C-430/22)

(2022/C 408/37)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad

Party to the main proceedings

VB

Questions referred

Must the second sentence of Article 8(4) of Directive 2016/343 (1) be interpreted as obliging a national court which convicts an accused person in absentia, without the conditions of Article 8(2) being met, to make express reference to the accused person’s right to have the proceedings reopened, to which he or she is entitled under Article 9 of that directive, in order that he or she can be informed of that right at a later stage, in particular when he or she is detained for the purpose of executing the sentence? The question arises in the light of the fact that national law provides neither for the person convicted in absentia to be informed of his or her right to have the proceedings reopened when he or she is detained for the purpose of executing the sentence, nor for the involvement of a court in the issuing of a European arrest warrant for the purpose of executing the sentence.

Must the second sentence of Article 8(4) of Directive 2016/343, and in particular the phrase ‘also informed of the possibility to challenge the decision and of the right to a new trial or to another legal remedy, in accordance with Article 9’, be interpreted as meaning that such information concerns a formally recognised right to have the proceedings reopened, or does it concern the right to request such reopening, whereby the substance of the request must then be examined?

---

(1)  Directive (EU) 2016/343 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on the strengthening of certain aspects of the presumption of innocence and of the right to be present at the trial in criminal proceedings (OJ 2016 L 65, p. 1).

---
No. 11-10251.

#### Davis *v.*California.

Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
# C_2022294EN.01001602.xml

| 1.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/16

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione (Italy) lodged on 13 May 2022 — KRI SpA, as the successor of SI.LO.NE. — Sistema logistico nord-est Srl v Agenzia delle dogane e dei monopoli

(Case C-323/22)

(2022/C 294/23)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Corte suprema di cassazione

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: KRI SpA, as the successor of SI.LO.NE. — Sistema logistico nord-est Srl

Respondent: Agenzia delle dogane e dei monopoli

Question referred

Must the first sentence of Article 14 of Council Directive 92/12/EEC of 25 February 1992 (1) be interpreted as meaning that in the event of irregular departure of the product subject to excise duty, the liability of the warehousekeeper guaranteeing payment of the duty is objective, with there being no possibility of exemption from that liability and from payment of the sums corresponding to the related financial penalties, even where that departure results from an unlawful act attributable — exclusively — to a third party, or can it be interpreted as meaning that the exemption from the tax and from the corresponding penalties is to be granted — as a fortuitous event or force majeure — to the guarantor warehousekeeper who not only has nothing whatsoever to do with the unlawful act of the third party but also had a legitimate and good faith expectation that the movement of the product under the duty suspension arrangement was regular?

---

(1)  Council Directive 92/12/EEC of 25 February 1992 on the general arrangements for products subject to excise duty and on the holding, movement and monitoring of such products (OJ 1992 L 76, p. 1).

---
# Jurnalul Oficial C 168/2018

| | ISSN 1977-1029 |
| --- | --- |
| Jurnalul Oficial
  al Uniunii Europene | C 168 |
| | |
| Ediţia în limba română | Comunicări şi informări | Anul 6115 mai 2018 |

ISSN 1977-1029

Jurnalul Oficial

al Uniunii Europene

C 168

Ediţia în limba română

Comunicări şi informări

Anul 6115 mai 2018

---

| Informarea nr. | Cuprins | Pagina |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Anunțuri |
| | PROCEDURI ADMINISTRATIVE |
| 2018/C 168/01 | Cerere de candidaturi pentru inițiativa WiFi4EU (promovarea conectivității la internet în comunitățile locale) din cadrul Mecanismului pentru interconectarea Europei în domeniul rețelelor de telecomunicații transeuropene [Programul de lucru 2017 modificat privind MIE — Decizia de punere în aplicare C(2017) 7732 a Comisiei] | 1 |

Informarea nr.

Cuprins

Pagina

V   Anunțuri

PROCEDURI ADMINISTRATIVE

2018/C 168/01

Cerere de candidaturi pentru inițiativa WiFi4EU (promovarea conectivității la internet în comunitățile locale) din cadrul Mecanismului pentru interconectarea Europei în domeniul rețelelor de telecomunicații transeuropene [Programul de lucru 2017 modificat privind MIE — Decizia de punere în aplicare C(2017) 7732 a Comisiei]

1

---

| RO | |
| --- | --- |

RO

---

V Anunțuri

PROCEDURI ADMINISTRATIVE

| 15.5.2018 | RO | Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene | C 168/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.5.2018

RO

Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene

C 168/1

---

Cerere de candidaturi pentru inițiativa WiFi4EU (promovarea conectivității la internet în comunitățile locale) din cadrul Mecanismului pentru interconectarea Europei în domeniul rețelelor de telecomunicații transeuropene

[Programul de lucru 2017 modificat privind MIE — Decizia de punere în aplicare C(2017) 7732 a Comisiei]

(2018/C 168/01)

Comisia Europeană, Direcția Generală Rețele de Comunicații, Conținut și Tehnologie, lansează următoarea cerere de candidaturi pentru inițiativa WiFi4EU, în vederea acordării de granturi pentru proiecte în conformitate cu prioritățile și obiectivele definite în Programul de lucru 2017 din domeniul rețelelor transeuropene de telecomunicații modificat, din cadrul Mecanismului pentru interconectarea Europei (MIE).

Sunt așteptate candidaturi pentru prima cerere (WiFi4EU-2017-1) pentru promovarea conectivității la internet în comunitățile locale.

Bugetul indicativ total disponibil pentru candidaturile selectate cu ocazia acestei cereri este de 17 745 000 EUR.

Termenul-limită pentru depunerea candidaturilor este 15 iunie 2018.

Candidaturile pentru cerere trebuie depuse prin intermediul portalului WiFi4EU: https://www.wifi4eu.eu/

Documentația aferentă cererii este disponibilă pe site-ul web al INEA: https://ec.europa.eu/inea/en/connecting-europe-facility/cef-telecom/wifi4eu

---
Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of
MOA Hospitality, Inc. (the "Company"), each hereby certifies that to his
knowledge, on the date hereof:

(a)       the Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2002,
          filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission
          (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)
          or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the
          Company.





                           /s/ Paul F. Wallace
                           -----------------------
                           Paul F. Wallace
                           Chief Executive Officer
                           December 19, 2002


                           /s/  Kurt M. Mueller
                           -----------------------
                           Kurt M. Mueller
                           Chief Financial Officer
                           December 19, 2002
#### Kokouvi AMOUZOU, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 17-1924

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: December 21, 2017

Decided: March 13, 2018

*279Kokouvi Amouzou, Petitioner Pro Se. Chad A. Readier, Kristen Giuffreda Chapman, Jennifer Parker Levings, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Before WILKINSON, FLOYD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kokouvi Amouzou, a native and citizen of Togo, petitions for review of an order of the Board Of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s decision denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). We have thoroughly reviewed the record, including the transcript of Amouzou’s merits hearing before the immigration court and all supporting evidence. We conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to the administrative factual findings, *see*8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and that the Board did not abuse its discretion in finding that Amouzou’s conviction was a particularly serious crime. *See Gao v. Holder,*595 F.3d 549, 556-57 (4th Cir. 2010) (noting standard of review). We also conclude that substantial evidence supports the finding that Amouzou failed to establish eligibility for deferral of removal under the CAT. *See INS v. Elias-Zacarias,*502 U.S. 478, 481, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992) (stating standard of review). Additionally, because Amouzou failed to substantially comply with the requirements under *In re Lozada,*19 I. *&*N. Dec. 637 (B.I.A. 1988), we will not review his claim that counsel was ineffective. *See Barry v. Gonzales,*445 F.3d 741, 745-47 (4th Cir. 2006). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We also deny Amouzou’s motion to reconsider the order denying his motion for stay. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED*
# C_2023015EN.01002701.xml

| 16.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 15/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 15/27

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Köln (Germany) lodged on 4 October 2022 — AB v Finanzamt Köln-Süd

(Case C-627/22)

(2023/C 15/29)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Finanzgericht Köln

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: AB

Defendant: Finanzamt Köln-Süd

Question referred

Are the provisions of the Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons, (1) which entered into force on 1 June 2002 (‘the Agreement on the Free Movement of Persons’; ‘the AFMP’), in particular Articles 7 and 15 of the AFMP, read in conjunction with Article 9(2) of Annex I to the AFMP (right to equal treatment), to be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State under which employees who are nationals of an EU or EEA Member State (including Germany) and who reside (with their place of residence or habitual abode) in Germany or in EU/EEA States may voluntarily apply for an assessment of income tax that takes into account income from employment that is taxable in Germany (‘voluntary assessment’), in particular in order to receive an income tax refund allowing for expenses (income-related expenses) and crediting German wage tax withheld as part of the tax deduction procedure, but that right is denied to German and Swiss nationals residing in Switzerland?

---

(1)  OJ 2002 L 114, p. 6.

---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 42 (Tuesday, March 4, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 9770]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5232]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of Banks 
or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. Once the notices have been accepted for 
processing, they will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later 
than March 18, 1997.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond (Lloyd W. Bostian, Jr., Senior 
Vice President) 701 East Byrd Street, Richmond, Virginia 23261-4528:
    1. Louis Ray Jones, Virginia Beach, Virginia; to acquire an 
additional 14.94 percent, for a total of 24.90 percent, of the voting 
shares of Resource Bank, Virginia Beach, Virginia.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Karen L. Grandstrand, Vice 
President) 250 Marquette Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480-2171:
    1. Carl W. Jones, Minnetonka, Minnesota, Christopher W. Jones, Long 
Lake, Minnesota, Janet N. Jones, Excelsior, Minnesota; each to acquire 
33.33 percent of the voting shares of Harbourside, LP, Wayzata, 
Minnesota, and thereby indirectly acquire Anchor Bancorp, Inc., 
Wayzata, Minnesota; Anchor Bank, N.A., Wayzata, Minnesota; Anchor Bank, 
West St. Paul, N.A., West St. Paul, Minnesota; The Bank of Saint Paul, 
St. Paul, Minnesota; Heritage National Bank, North St. Paul, Minnesota; 
and The First National Bank of Farmington, Farmington, Minnesota.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 26, 
1997.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-5232 Filed 3-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 46 (Monday, March 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10880-10881]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5922]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION


Sunshine Act Meeting; Notice of Change in Subject of Meeting

    The National Credit Union Administration Board determined that its 
business requires the deletion of the following item from the 
previously announced open meeting (Federal Register, 62 FR 10086, March 
5, 1997) scheduled for 8:10 a.m., Friday, March 7, 1997.
    3. Charter Application from the Proposed First Combined Community 
Federal Credit Union.
    The Board voted (2-to-0, Vice Chairman Bowne was unavailable) that 
Agency business required that this item be deleted from the open 
agenda. Earlier announcement of this change was not possible.
    The previously announced items were:
    1. Approval of Minutes of Previous Open Meeting.

[[Page 10881]]

    2. Requests from Federal Credit Unions to Convert to a Community 
Charter.
    3. Charter Application from the Proposed First Combined Community 
Federal Credit Union.
    4. Request from a Corporate Federal Credit Union for a Field of 
Membership amendment.
    5. Final Rule: Part 704, NCUA's Rules and Regulations, Corporate 
Credit Unions.
    6. Proposed Rule: Request for Comments on Federal Credit Union 
Bylaws.
    7. Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking: Request for Comments on 
Interpretive Rulings and Policy Statements (IRPS).
    8. Proposed Rule: Amendments to Sections 701.26(b), 701.27, and 
740.3(c), and addition of Part 712, NCUA's Rules and Regulations, 
Credit Union Service Contracts, Credit Union Service Organizations, and 
Advertising.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Becky Baker, Secretary of the Board, Telephone (703) 518-6304.
Becky Baker,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-5922 Filed 3-5-97; 4:21 pm]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-M