alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Sample collection : Owosso Graphic Arts 

Terri Zick to: Christopher Lambesis, Todd Ramaly 04/14/2008 04:02 PM 

From: Terri Zick <tzick@cticompanies.com > 

To: Christopher Lambesis/R5/USEPA/US@EPA, Todd Ramaly/R5/USEPA/US@EPA 

HiThank you again for making the trip to Owosso Graphic Arts last Thursday. I wanted to confirm that the 

press was opened on Friday & we collected the first of 3 grab samples. The lab had some concerns 

whether they could preserve the sample within the required time frame so we did opt to sample using the 

methanol field preservation method. It seemed the best option considering the holding time constraints of 

other non-field preserved methods. 

I will e-mail you the data as soon as the results are available. 

Thanks again 

in The information contained n this electronic message is privileged and/or confidential nformation ntended only for the use of the information i 

individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible 

to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of the communication is 

neither allowed nor intended. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by return e-mail or by 

calling 800-CTI-TODAY and delete the message. Thank You!
2018 EAVS Data Brief: West Virginia EAVS Jurisdictions 

55 

 Voter Registration 

Total Registered Voters, 

Nov. 20181 

1,245,827 

1 A1a of EAVS 

Registration Forms Received, 

E-Day 2016 – E-Day 20182 

287,111 

2 A3a of EAVS 

New Voters Registered, 

E-Day 2016 – E-Day 20183 

76,858 

3 A3b of EAVS 

Sources of Registration Forms4 

4 A4a-l of EAVS 

Mail/Fax/Email 16,128 

In-Person 18,960 

Online 43,609 

Motor Vehicle Office 94,795 

Public Assistance 

Office 0 

Disability Office 0 

Military Recruitment 

Office 0 

Other Non-NVRA 

Office 0 

Registration Drives 0 

Other Sources or Not 

Categorized 113,619 

 Voter Turnout 

Voters Participating by Mode5 

By Mail 

10,342 

2% 

In-Person Early 

175,403 In-Person E-Day 30% 402,733 

68% 

Other Mode 

3,539 

0% 

5 In-person Election Day 

voters is F1b. By-mail voters 

is F1d+F1g. In-person early 

voters is F1f. Other mode is 

F1c+F1e+F1h. 

Total Turnout:6 597,149 

6 F1a of EAVS 

Provisional Voters:7 2,823 

7 F1e of EAVS 

UOCAVA Voters:8 716 

8 F1c of EAVS 

Election Technology 

Technology Used by Jurisdictions9 

29

20 

14 

0 

DRE w/o DRE with Ballot Scanner Hand Electronic 

0 

VVPAT VVPAT Marking Count Poll Book 

Device 

21 



9 F3a-d, F5a-F8a, and 

F11a of EAVS 

Election Policies 

✔ Has online voter registration10 

10 Q6 of Policy Survey 

Has a form of same-day voter registration (SDR)11 

11 Q7 of Policy Survey 

Has all-mail elections statewide12 

Has all-mail elections in certain jurisdictions12 

12 Q9a of Policy Survey 

✔ Allows voters to register as permanent absentee 

voters13 

✔ 13 Q10 of Policy Survey Requires excuse for by-mail voting14 

Requires excuse for in-person early or in-person 14 Q8 of Policy Survey 

absentee voting15 15 Q12a of Policy Survey 

Uses vote centers16 16 Q13 of Policy Survey 

Notes 

EAVS data and reports may be downloaded at 

www.eac.gov. 

Responses of “Does not apply” and “Data not available”

are shown as zeroes.
az®® ±

©z ̄® 

z¤«® 

ʜ((mmlʑmn*m 

¤ ¤ 

© ̄® 

© ̄® 

ʜ((mml&m 

U

M#&u#4u'#& 

&.#)(R!#.,, 

OȨ

I(.,(.

!MV 

P/&#˽ #.(

OȨ

!##&#.# ˽!(3 

M#&#.,3 

R,/#.'(.OȨ 

O. ,S..˽!(3 R!#.,.#)(!,#0

R!#.,.#)(vO. , 

          

!#lmpm#m*#mp)mnp 

mm(!#lmpmmpl 

˼ˑȀȂȂˑ˻ȁȄ 



gistrtionFormsi; 

ȁȁ˼ˑ˻Ȅ˾ 

ʑm*˄p)m#m*Nmm#˄m#m*l*m 

ȁȁˑȀȃ˾ 

P)&&#(! 

P& 

UO˳˽V˽ ˽(. P,)0##)(& 

ˏ&&). 

,&3V). 

˳(., 

V).3 

M#& 

T/,()/.v 

O.,

       

m#m*#np*mnm5Mm"m 

˳)/(.#/&& ˳)/(. 

P,. 

R$. P,)0##)(&v 

O.,

¢u¡2 

£u¦3 

  

tionE˪ro;isionlˏllots 

U(#),'S,0# 

N)('#&#.,3O0,

O.,

m#m*ʜOʑʛʛ 

˾ˑ˻ȁȀ 

˾ˑȃȄ˿ 

˻ 

ȁˑȄȀȄ 

ʜ((mmlp*l)#mm 

OʛL OʛL 

Ppm2#l#m*(ʜ((mmmm({« z«®¤ np*mnmmm({©z©© z® ̄ 

N).v˴S) ˴Ȧ&˴3˴˴&(%˴),˴n,)˴/˴.)˴.˴().˴#(!˴,*),.), 

$/,##.#)(˴().)&&.#(!...t 

lt˒ ɤ 

OʛL 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

---

- -

- -

- -

2016 EAVS Data Brief

TAH 

m#m*ʛmmpRegistration

U ' 

"

" - '-

"

- "

¬

" ¬

¬ ¬

¬ ¬­

- - - "

" "

' -'

- - "
No. D-2687.

#### In re Discipline of Siegelman.

Don Eugene Siegelman, of Birmingham, Ala., is suspended from the practice of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
Exhibit 32.2

| (1)   | The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: April 20, 2011 |                                           |   |
|----------------------|------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                 |                                           |   |
|                 |                                           |   |
|                 |                                           |   |
|                 | /s/ Peter Lee                                  |
|                 | Peter Lee                                      |
|                 | Director, Secretary andChief Financial Officer |
Exhibit 4.2 Supplement to Guarantee


 


Exhibit 4.2
SUPPLEMENT TO GUARANTEE
		
	TO:
	BNY TRUST COMPANY OF CANADA as trustee (the “Trustee”) under a Trust Indenture (as the same may be supplemented amended restated or replaced from time to time, the “Trust Indenture”) dated as of June 1, 2010 providing for the issuance of Notes (as defined therein) of Tim Hortons Inc. (the “Obligor”).


THIS SUPPLEMENT TO GUARANTEE is made as of this 28th day of March, 2014.
WHEREAS pursuant to the guarantee made the 1st day of June 2010 (the “Guarantee”) by the undersigned (hereinafter referred to as the “Guarantor”) in favour of the Trustee and each of the holders of the Notes, the Guarantor has guaranteed the Obligations (as defined in the Guarantee) of the Obligor pursuant and subject to the terms of the Trust Indenture;
AND WHEREAS pursuant to the terms of the Trust Indenture, the Obligor and the Trustee are entering into a third supplemental trust indenture (the “Third Supplement”) dated as of March 28, 2014 providing for the issuance of Series 3 Notes (as defined therein) in the aggregate principal amount of Cdn.$450,000,000 (the “Issued Notes”);
NOW THEREFORE THIS SUPPLEMENT TO GUARANTEE WITNESSES that for value received, and intending to be legally bound by this Supplement to Guarantee, the Guarantor hereby confirms in favour of and acknowledges and covenants with the Trustee as follows:
		
	1.
	All of the Issued Notes are Notes and, accordingly, all principal of and Premium (as defined in the Trust Indenture), if any, and interest on the Issued Notes and all other amounts due or owing to Noteholders (as defined in the Guarantee) in accordance with the terms of the Issued Notes and the Trust Indenture (as supplemented by the Third Supplement) are Obligations in respect of which the terms set forth in the Guarantee apply.


		
	2.
	The Guarantee, as supplemented by this Supplement to Guarantee, shall remain in full force and effect, and shall continue to guarantee the due and punctual payment to the Noteholders of all Obligations (as such term has been supplemented in Section 1 above) of the Obligor in accordance with the terms of the Trust Indenture and Notes, subject to the release conditions set forth in the Guarantee and the Trust Indenture.


		
	3.
	The Guarantor shall deliver all such other documents and shall do all such other things as the Trustee reasonably requires from time to time to perform and carry out the purpose and intent of this Supplement to Guarantee.


This Supplement to Guarantee will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the Province of Ontario and the laws of Canada applicable therein.
 [Signature page to follow]
	
				
	 
	 
	THE TDL GROUP CORP.

	By:
	/s/ MICHAEL J. MYSKIW

	 
	Name:   Michael J. Myskiw

	 
	Title:   Vice President, Tax and Treasurer

	 
	 

	By:
	/s/ CYNTHIA J. DEVINE

	 
	Name:   Cynthia J. Devine

	 
	Title:   Chief Financial Officer
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COUNCIL SIGN IN SHEET FOR MEETING Thursday / September 12 / 2013 Room 863 Hersch/er Building 122 W. 25th / Cheyenne / WY 82001 Name (Please Print) Name of Company/O

r ganization !Address (Company

, Organization

, or Residence)

I Phone Numb e r **D&~-At:Y..C**

l zJ(9o (/ .. Hnl- **~,.** .. **~-~.** S.e-t.-tcJ

· p, **w~**

1 [,7\-Si.'L"f 2 /)EG.. ... AQ-D

1.)2 UJ . **)~.h** Si · **Ct-+~YGNNE.** I).) 'f 17/-3 7'-1' i6Ue!&.

.. **~):)**

l \
**t't1 ~**  **~~** II 77?-ccOW 5

(, 6

VJ

(I 7 ({9...- **~0**

1\

**~**r r

' ->l 1 8

v V' vr l 9

r r ,...... r• **J{~ T**  "-'')

? t:l/ 10

,, **1~ ~~~~~~~**  **--------;- ~~~~**  **--------------------------~ ~~~**  **~~~~ ~~~**  **~-- ~~~~**  **----------+- ~~**  **~~~ __,**  4- **~~c..L.t,v** 177-?--'11 'L.£ 111-'13€-0 1 6

35
. 3c-r .-e72.

. 21b2 17

2 OCi - **~** le!. t:i , :Z.o-:2 y- **18~ ~~**  **~~ ~~~**  **---+ ~~**  **~~~ ~~**  **~~ LL**  **------~ ~~~**  **~~ ~--~--**  **-------- ~~~~~~**  **~** 1 9

_..><::--

' ' ./ ...- . **~ ~** Name (P l ease Print) 1 //J11.: 1}1(/ 1-t;v err **~{hll GoU~-btvt.**  3 f:.tJ.Y h **;t{~f~** 4 **L~ ;~**  fCku 1 **~on rf'L~**  **r-f ~**  - **L~:k_€~.&2.-\** \_.e._ 6 -

v 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COUNCIL SIGN IN SHEET FOR MEETING Thursday

, Sept e mber 12 , 2013 Room 863 Herschler Building 122 W . 25th, Cheyenne

, WY 82001 Name of Company/Organization Add r ess (Company, Organizat

i on, or Residence) wy /)£Q cu **a¥~"'"L--** r=: r)P **~1J {a.~?ta** **Ch r.-1~**  C) f: 'N l11 cpq_ t;CI **~** 1Art4 **Cko~A(Jc..** IO **~** SGr **(;~ f4c~.rw**  ()Jy **o2~'L** D [Q - t\QD
j_ 'l_?_ w. t_ st!:- s ,J. . **Cht e/lll~**  WY 'l **7.-o~JL.** OECX
- {.._Q_Q

/ **~-~~** \7--z- **w.~<&\.** 0_\fs. w'-1 C{ 1..-(;)c.) 2 I

J

.. Phone Number **?77-?s~K** CJL,- ro a3 ?)c;2z -so 7 Frz 3t:ry; **~£)..-9(}9 -~-:L?_l**  307-77 7-7o'-fk> '601 - 171- 7740
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
33-44581, 33-44582, 33-45491, 333-39738 and 333-66426 of Public Service
Enterprise Group Incorporated (the "Company") on Form S-8 and Registration
Statement Nos. 33-49123, 333-47714, 333-86372, and 333-101400 on Form S-3 of the
Company dated February 7, 2003, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
the Company for the year ended December 31, 2002.

Deloitte & Touche LLP
Parsippany, New Jersey

February 25, 2003
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                              CERTIFICATION OF CFO

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Ozley Act of 2002.

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q of the National Housing
Trust Limited Partnership for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange commission on the date hereof, I Susan E. Basting,
Chief Financial Officer of the Limited Partnership, do hereby certify, pursuant
to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and

(2)  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, that financial condition and result of operations on the Limited
     Partnership.

Date August 14, 2002            By  /s/ Susan E. Basting
     ---------------                --------------------
                                     Susan E. Basting, Treasurer
                                     and Chief Financial Officer
                                     NHT, Inc., General Partner
                                     National Housing Trust Limited Partnership

                                       18
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-20687 Conference Calendar

SONIA MARIE MCMORRIS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus PHILIP MICHAEL THOMAS, Defendant-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-01-MC-173

-------------------- April 11, 2002 Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Sonia Marie McMorris appeals the district court’s denial of her motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). The denial of IFP is an appealable final decision. Flowers v. Turbine Support Div. , 507 F.2d 1242, 1244 (5th Cir. 1975). However, McMorris has abandoned the issue by failing to brief it on appeal, having devoted her appellate brief to the merits of her lawsuit, which have not yet been addressed in the district court. See Yohey v.No. 01-20687 -2- Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993). Even if it is assumed that McMorris has sufficiently preserved the issue for appeal, her district-court IFP motion demonstrates that she had ample funds with which to pay the filing fee, as the district court determined. The instant appeal is wholly without arguable merit, is frivolous, and is therefore DISMISSED. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. McMorris is CAUTIONED that any future frivolous filings will result in the imposition of sanctions. The motion to supplement the record on appeal is DENIED.
APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTION DENIED; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
Of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Rand Capital SBIC, L.P.
(the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that: The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 (the
Form 10-K) of the Company fully complies with the requirement of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company Dated: March 28, 2005/s/ Allen F. GrumAllen F. Grum, President of Rand CapitalCorporation(equivalent of chief executive officer ofRand Capital SBIC, L.P.)Dated: March 28, 2005/s/ Daniel P. PenberthyDaniel P. Penberthy, Treasurer of RandCapital Corporation(equivalent of chief financial officer ofRand Capital SBIC, L.P.)
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

August 2, 2011

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

PUBLISH

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

JESUS CONTRERAS-BOCANEGRA, 

Petitioner,

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., United States

Attorney General, 

Respondent,

------------------------------

AMERICAN IMMIGRATION

COUNCIL; AMERICAN

IMMIGRATION LAWYERS

ASSOCIATION; NATIONAL

IMMIGRATION PROJECT OF THE

NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD; POSTDEPORTATION HUMAN RIGHTS

PROJECT; ROCKY MOUNTAIN

IMMIGRANT ADVOCACY

NETWORK, 

Amici Curiae.

No. 10-9500

ORDER

Before BRISCOE, Chief Judge, KELLY, LUCERO, MURPHY, HARTZ, O’BRIEN,

TYMKOVICH, GORSUCH, HOLMES and MATHESON, Circuit Judges.
-2-

This matter is before the court on the petitioner’s request for en banc rehearing.

We also have a response in opposition from the respondent, as well as two amicus curiae

briefs. Upon consideration, the request for en banc rehearing is granted. See 10th Cir. R.

35.6. This matter will be heard en banc on the court’s November 2011 oral argument

calendar. That calendar is set for the week of November 14, 2011. The parties will be

advised of the exact date and time for argument when the calendar is finalized. 

In addition, the parties are directed to file simultaneous supplemental briefs on or

before August 30, 2011 addressing the following questions:

1. Could the Attorney General's regulatory decision to limit the

"jurisdiction" of the BIA through the post-departure bar (8 C.F.R. 

§ 1003.2(d)) be characterized as a “categorical exercise of discretion”? 

2. There appears to be some tension between 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(9)(A)’s

bar on admission of previously removed aliens and 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(6)

& (7)’s allowance for reopening or reconsideration in at least some

circumstances. Could the post-departure bar be a reasonable regulatory

response by the Attorney General to this apparent ambiguity?

3. If a removed alien succeeds in a motion to reopen or reconsider, what

relief can the BIA grant? How does the availability and nature of any

possible relief from the BIA inform the reasonableness of 8 C.F.R. 

§ 1003.2(d)’s post-departure bar?

4. May a removed alien seek reconsideration or reopening directly from the

Attorney General? If so, does the ability to seek reconsideration or

reopening from additional sources satisfy 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(6) & (7)?

The briefs shall be limited to 20 pages in length in a 13 point font. The parties are
-3-

directed to file those briefs on or before the due date via the court’s ECF system, then to

forward to the office of the clerk, within 2 business days, an additional 14 hard copies. In

light of the November calendar setting, requests for extension of time are discouraged. 

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER

Clerk of Court
# C_2022340EN.01001701.xml

| 5.9.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 340/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.9.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 340/17

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 27 May 2022 — PT v VB

(Case C-343/22)

(2022/C 340/21)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Defendant and appellant on a point of law: PT

Claimant and respondent in the appeal on a point of law: VB

Question referred

Must Article 34(2) of the Lugano Convention on Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters of 30 October 2007 (‘the Lugano Convention’) (1) be interpreted as meaning that the statement of claim in an action seeking repayment of a debt, which was brought after a Swiss order for payment had been issued previously and which did not include an application for the annulment of the objection lodged against the order for payment, constitutes the document which instituted the proceedings?

---

(1)  OJ 2009 L 147, p. 1.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997             SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997             MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                      17,517,032              15,588,504
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  713,210                 368,062
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                  5,075,613               6,365,350
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            27,906,807              24,582,007
<PP&E>                                       4,785,412               3,684,139
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,457,681               1,190,380
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              31,708,331              27,627,860
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       18,022,670              10,026,144
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        55,758                  55,686
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,629,903              17,546,030
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                31,708,331              27,627,860
<SALES>                                     40,469,268              51,577,877
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0                       0
<CGS>                                       29,873,040              35,130,375
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            10,014,352               7,017,809
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,587,044)               9,728,632
<INCOME-TAX>                               (1,817,130)               3,533,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,769,914)               6,195,132
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.60)                     .94
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.60)                     .94
        

</TABLE>
# C_2022244EN.01001101.xml

| 27.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 244/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 244/11

---

Appeal brought on 1 February 2022 by Industria de Diseño Textil SA (Inditex) against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 1 December 2021 in Case T-467/20, Inditex v EUIPO — Ffauf Italia (ZARA)

(Case C-65/22 P)

(2022/C 244/14)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Industria de Diseño Textil SA (Inditex) (represented by: C. Duch Fonoll and S. Sáenz de Ormijana Rico, abogadas)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), Ffauf Italia SpA

By order of 6 May 2022, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) held that the appeal was not allowed to proceed and that Industria de Diseño Textil SA (Inditex) should bear its own costs.

---