alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 34.1

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Management Committee
 BMW Financial Services NA, LLC

We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying Certification Regarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria, that BMW Financial Services NA, LLC (the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange  Commission's Regulation AB for Asset-Backed Securities, BMW Vehicle Lease Trust 2015-1 (except for the servicing criteria described in the following paragraph), which the Company has determined as being applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the asset-backed securities transactions being serviced as of December 31, 2016 and for the period from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance with those servicing criteria based on our examination.

The Company has determined that the servicing criteria in Items 1122(d)(1)(ii), 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(4)(ix), 1122(d)(4)(x)(A)-(C), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii), 1122(d)(4)(xiii), and 1122(d)(4)(xv) are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the asset-backed securities transactions being serviced as of December 31, 2016 and for the period from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria specified in the first paragraph of this report and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria specified in the first paragraph.

In our opinion, management’s assertion that BMW Financial Services NA, LLC complied, in all material respects, with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of December 31, 2016 and for the period from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016 is fairly stated, in all material respects.



/s/ CohnReznick LLP

Roseland, New Jersey
 March 22, 2017
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel; Alzheimer's Disease Drug Development.                    

*Date:*                         May 26, 2022.                    

*Time:*                         12:00 p.m. to 4:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Alexander Parsadanian, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building 2C/212, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-9666,                         *parsadaniana@nia.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: April 1, 2022.

Miguelina Perez,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2022-07384 Filed 4-6-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
EXHIBIT
32




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND


CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.


SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION


906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned officers each certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Caspian International
Oil Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.





August
      14, 2008
            /s/ Nurlan
      JanseitovNurlan
      JanseitovChief
      Executive OfficerAugust
      14, 2008
            /s/ David
      FultonDavid
      FultonChief
      Financial Officer








This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- Directorate Identifier: 

### 2014

- NM

- 230

- AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into and t hen out of the changed cell

.

**Estimated Costs:**

Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per **Product** (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance) Work

- hours (include access, testing, and close

- up) Labor

cost (@$8 5 /h our) Parts Cost Total Costs (labor + parts) Number of

**U.S. Registered**  **Products** Total Cost

for U.S. Fleet



### In spection s 1 .0 $ 85.00 $ 

### 0 $ 85.00 

### 80 $ 6,800.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.0 0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00


### The known number of products in comp liance: 

### 0 Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 6,800 

### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $ 

### 0

**On**

**- Condition Costs:** 

Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Work

- hours

(include access, testing, and close

up) Labor cost

(@$85/hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product



### Replacement 3.0 $ 255.00 $ 

### 0 $ 255.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00



### Special considerations for Economic Analysis ( Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explai n warranty costs) 

### :

### Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES * NO

* Explanation: **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:**
Is the AD significant?

YES * NO

* Explanation: **Regulatory Flexibility Act:**
Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO Explanation:

**Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:**
This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requiremen ts for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES * NO



### * Explanation 

### :
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 67 (Thursday, April 7, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 20497]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-07371]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Data Collection Available for Public Comments

ACTION: 60-Day notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Small Business Administration (SBA) intends to request 
approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for the 
collection of information described below. The Paperwork Reduction Act 
(PRA) requires agencies to publish a notice in the Federal Register 
concerning each proposed collection of information before submission to 
OMB, and to allow 60 days for public comment in response to the notice. 
This notice complies with that requirement.

DATES: Submit comments on or before June 6, 2022.

ADDRESSES: Send all comments to Lori Gillen, HUBZone Program, Small 
Business Administration, Washington, DC 20416.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lori Gillen, HUBZone Program Director 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e78b88958ec9808e8b8b8289a7948586c9808891"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="432f2c312a6d242a2f2f262d033021226d242c35">[email protected]</span></a> or Curtis B. Rich Agency Clearance Officer 202-205-
7030 <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3d5e484f49544e134f545e557d4e5f5c135a524b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="87e4f2f5f3eef4a9f5eee4efc7f4e5e6a9e0e8f1">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The collected information is submitted by 
small business concerns seeking certification as a certified HUBZone 
small business. SBA uses the information to verify a concern's 
eligibility for the HUBZone programs, to comply a database of qualified 
small business concerns, as well as for the re-certification and 
examination of certified HUBZone small business concerns. Finally, SBA 
uses the information to prepare reports for the Executive and 
legislative branches.

OMB Control Number 3245-0320

    Title: ``HUBZone Program Electronic Application, Recertification, 
and Program Examination.''
    Description of Respondents: Small business concerns seeking 
certification as a certified HUBZone small business concern.
    Form Number: N/A.
    Annual Responses: 3,621.
    Annual Burden: 11,425.5.

Curtis Rich,
Management Analyst.
[FR Doc. 2022-07371 Filed 4-6-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-03-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         205,191
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         671,628
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    102,250
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        675,561
<ALLOWANCE>                                      8,126
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,090,344
<DEPOSITS>                                     939,183
<SHORT-TERM>                                    32,674
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             18,336
<LONG-TERM>                                     27,657
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     11,659
<COMMON>                                            92
<OTHER-SE>                                      83,946
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,090,344
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 50,794
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                3,236
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 1,645
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                55,675
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              18,992
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              22,639
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           33,036
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    2,622
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 37,075
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,063
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      11,063
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,514
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.46
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.54
<LOANS-NON>                                      7,338
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 7,820
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      692
<RECOVERIES>                                       298
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                8,126
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             8,126
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          5,225
        

</TABLE>
Order filed July 26 , 2016.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14

- 16

- 00210

- CV

____________

O.C.T.G., L.L.P AND SOJOURN PARTNERS, L. L.C. , Appellant s

V.

LAGUNA TUBULAR PRODU CTS CORPORATION AND LTP REAL

ESTATE, LLC , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 190th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2013

- 44749



### ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due April 15, 2016

. See Tex. R. App.

P. 35.1. On June 14, 2016, this court ordered the court reporter to file the record

within 30 days. On July 15, 2016, the official court reporter filed a request for

extension of time to file the record. To date, no reporter’s record has been filed. We

deny the request and issue the following order.We order My Thuy Cieslar , the official court reporter, to file the record in

this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order

. No further extension will be

entertained abs ent exceptional circumstances. The trial and appellate courts are

jointly responsible for ensuring that the ap pellate record is timely filed. See Tex. R.

App. P. 35.3(c). If My Thuy Cieslar does not timely file the record as ordered, we

will issue an order directing the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine the

reason for the failure to file the record.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Busby, Donovan, and Wise.
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 00001

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

File Name Description

05169\05169_ HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 05169\05169_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05169\05169_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05169\05169_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05169\05169_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05169\05169_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

05169\05169_ Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement

05169\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\05169_ EA Report.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

05169\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\05169_ PGS 2009 GW Flow Map Fig 5.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

05169\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\05169_ PGS Flow Diagram v3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

05169\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\05169_ Site_Aerial_with comments.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

05169\05169_Email Communication.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05169\05169_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

x 05169\05169_ Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

x Draft Questions for Follow Up

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 05169

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

05169\05169_ HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 05169\05169_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05169\05169_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05169\05169_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05169\05169_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05169\05169_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

05169\05169_ Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement

05169\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\05169_ EA Report.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05169\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\05169_ PGS 2009 GW Flow Map Fig 5.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05169\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\05169_ PGS Flow Diagram v3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05169\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\05169_ Site_Aerial_with comments.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05169\05169_Email Communication.pdf Follow-up correspondence and materials for the survey.

x 05169\05169_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

05169\05169_ Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
No. 11-9921.

#### Mayes *v.*Rowley, Warden, et al.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED
September 13, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-20697 Summary Calendar

LORETHA KANIDA,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

GULF COAST MEDICAL PERSONNEL, LP;

NURSEFINDERS, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-00-CV-1770

--------------------
Before DAVIS, SMITH, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Loretha Kanida filed the instant suit to seek redress for,

inter alia, retaliation in viol ation of the Fair Labor Standards

Act (FLSA) and failure to pay overtime. A jury found in favor of

the defendants, and that judgment was affirmed in a different

appeal. S ee Kanida v. Gulf Coast Medical Pers., LP, 363 F.3d 568,

572 (5th Cir. 2004).

The instant appeal conc erns the district court’s denial of

Kanida’s F ED

. R. C IV

. P. 60(b) motion for relief from judgment. ThisNo. 03-20697 -2-

motion was based on the recent rediscovery of a cassette tape that

Kanida’s attorney lost within her office. Kanida argued in

pertinent part that she was entitled to relief based on excusable

neglect and because admission of the tape would have changed the

outcome of trial. The district court determined that the motion

was both untimely and substantively unavailing. Kanida argues that

the d istrict court abused its discretion in reaching these

conclusions.

Kanida’s argum ents are unavailing. In light of the

circumstances presented, the district court did not abuse its

discretion in concluding that her motion was not filed within a

reasonable time. S ee First RepublicBank v. Nor glass, Inc. , 958

F.2d 117, 119 (5th Cir. 1992).

The district court also did not abuse its d iscretion in

determining that Kanida’s substantive claims lacke d merit. The

carelessness of Kanida’s attor ney does not constitute excusable

neglect for F ED

. R. C IV

. P. 60(b)(1) purposes. S ee Lavespere v.
Niagra Machine & Tool Works, Inc. , 910 F.2d 167, 173 (5th Cir.

1990), abrogated on other grounds by Little v. Liquid Air Corp. , 37

F.3d 1069, 10 75 (5th Cir. 1994) ( e n banc ); United States v. One

1978 Piper Navajo PA-31, Aircraft , 748 F.2d 316, 318-19 (5th Cir.

1984). Kanida also has not shown exceptional circumstances

sufficient to merit relief under F ED

. R. C IV

. P. 60(b)(6). S ee Hess

v. Cockrell
, 281 F.3d 212, 216 (5th Cir. 2002 ). We decline to

consider Kanida’s claim of fraud under F E D

. R. C IV

. P. 60(b)(3)No. 03-20697 -3-

becau se this claim was not presented to the district court. S ee

Fackelman v. Bell , 564 F.2d 734, 736 n.1 (5th Cir. 1977).

Kanida has not shown that the di strict court abused its

discretion in denying her F ED

. R. C IV

. P. 60(b) motion.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>





                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Torch Energy Royalty Trust (the
"Trust") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Michael Smith, Chief Financial Officer of Torch Energy Advisors Incorporated,
the grantor of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S)1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Trust.

Dated: August 13, 2002


                                              /s/ Michael Smith
                                              ---------------------------------
                                              Michael Smith,
                                              Chief Financial Officer