alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered October 28, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00560-CR

JOSE DAVID GUTIERREZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F16-23201-H

ORDER

Retained counsel Jeffery King filed appellant’s brief on September 25, 2020. 

Thereafter, the State Bar of Texas notified the Court that counsel was no longer 

eligible to practice law in the State of Texas. We notified counsel by letter dated 

October 5, 2020 that he was being removed from this case due to his ineligibility to 

practice law; to date, counsel has not responded and remains listed as ineligible on 

the State Bar of Texas website.
On January 31, 2020, the trial court made certain findings of fact which were 

filed in a supplemental clerk’s record, including a finding that appellant is indigent. 

In light of this, we ORDER the trial court to appoint, WITHIN FOURTEEN 

DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, an attorney to represent appellant in 

the appeal. We ORDER Dallas County District Clerk Felicia Pitre to file a 

supplemental clerk’s record with the new appointment of counsel within TEN 

DAYS of the date of the appointment.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Tina 

Yoo Clinton, Presiding Judge, Criminal District Court No. 1; Dallas County 

District Clerk Felicia Pitre; Jeffery King; the Dallas County District Attorney’s 

Office, Appellate Division; and to Jose David Gutierrez, TDCJ #02263812, Allred 

Unit, 2101 FM 369 North, Iowa Park, TX 76367.

The appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with this order. It 

shall be reinstated twenty-four days from the date of this order or when the

supplemental record is received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ BILL PEDERSEN, III 

JUSTICE
# C_2021391EN.01002002.xml

| 27.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 391/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 391/20

---

Action brought on 2 August 2021 — Coulter Ventures v EUIPO — iWeb (R)

(Case T-457/21)

(2021/C 391/29)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Coulter Ventures LLC (Columbus, Ohio, United States) (represented by: R. Dissmann, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: iWeb GmbH (Berlin, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark R — Application for registration No 13 750 849

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 June 2021 in Case R 2789/2019-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs including the applicant’s costs incurred in the proceedings before the EUIPO. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs including the applicant’s costs incurred in the proceedings before the EUIPO.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
EXHIBIT 31.1  RULE 13A-14(A)/15D-14(A) CERTIFICATION  I, Nurlan Janseitov, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Caspian International Oil Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and the internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the small business issuer and have:  a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions after the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a. All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.  November 12, 2007 /s/ Nurlan Janseitov Nurlan Janseitov Chief Executive Officer
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 14

- 00072

- CR

David Kitzmiller

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the 158th District Court

o f Denton Cou nty (F

- 2013

- 0272

- B )

April 30 , 2014

P er C uriam

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for

want of jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
2022 EAVS Data Brief: Iowa EAVS Jurisdictions:

99 

 Voter Registration 

Active Reg. Voters as of Nov. 8, 20221 

1,880,415 

Reg. Forms Received2* 

856,747 

Total Confirmation Notices Sent3* 

294,154 

Voters Removed from Reg. Rolls4* 

86,404 1.8% 

1.8%

2.8% 

14.2% 

79.3% 

Mail, Email, Fax 

In Person 

Online 

Motor Vehicle Dept. 

Other 

Source of Registration Applications5 

 Voting and Turnout  Election Technology 

Voters Participating By Mode6 Percentage of Jurisdictions Using...10 

In-Person 

Election Day

859,562 

69.9% 

Mail 

368,907

30.0% 

Other 

1,674 

0.1% 

Total Voting Locations8: 1,653 

Total Poll Workers9: 7,330 

7 Turnout 

51.7% 

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 

0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 

Ballot 

Marking 

Devices 

Electronic 

Poll 

Books 

Scanners DREs w/o 

VVPAT 

DREs with

VVPAT 

Hand 

Counting 

 Mail Ballots 

• 379,302 mail ballots transmitted11 

• 97.5% of transmitted mail ballots returned by voters12 

• 99.8% of returned mail ballots counted13 

• 0.2% of returned mail ballots rejected14 

• Did not conduct all-mail election15 

• Allowed drop boxes16 

• Allowed ballot curing17 

 Election Audits18 

-- Access audit -- Legal audit 

Logic and accuracy 

testing -- Ballot design audit ✔

Ballot reconciliation 

audit 

Post-election 

tabulation audit ✔ ✔

Compliance/ 

procedural audit -- -- Other 

-- Eligibility audit 

Notes 

EAVS data and reports may be downloaded at www.eac.gov 

/research-and-data/datasets-codebooks-and-surveys. 

Responses of “Does not apply,” “Data not available,” and “Valid 

skip” are shown as zeroes or dashes. Percentages may not sum 

to 100% because of missing data or rounding. 

* Close of registration for 2020 

general election to close of 

registration for 2022 general 

election. 

1 A1b of EAVS. 

2 A3a of EAVS. 

3 A8a of EAVS. 

4 A9a of EAVS. 

5 Mail, Email, Fax is A4a/A3a. 

In Person is A4b/A3a. Online is 

A4c/A3a. Motor Vehicle Dept. is 

A4d/A3a. Other is the sum of 

A4e–A4l/A3a. May not sum to 

100% because of missing data. 

6 In-Person Election Day is F1b. 

Mail is F1d+F1g. In-Person Early 

is F1f. Other is F1c+F1e+F1h. 

7 F1a of EAVS divided by citizen 

voting age population (CVAP). 

8 D2a of EAVS. 

9 D7a of EAVS. 

10 F3a–f, F5a–F9a of EAVS; 

number of jurisdictions that 

responded “Yes” divided by

number of jurisdictions in 

state/territory. 

11 C1a of EAVS. 

12 C1b/C1a of EAVS. 

13 C8a/C1b of EAVS. 

14 C9a/C1b of EAVS. 

15 Q17 and Q17a of Policy 

Survey. 

16 Q19 of Policy Survey. 

17 Q20 of Policy Survey. 

18 Q36 of Policy Survey. See 

survey questionnaire for full 

definitions of each type of 

audit.
# C_2021242EN.01005202.xml

| 21.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 242/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 242/52

---

Action brought on 3 May 2021 — Meta Cluster v EUIPO (Clustermedizin)

(Case T-233/21)

(2021/C 242/74)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Meta Cluster GmbH (Pyrbaum, Germany) (represented by: H. Baumann, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: Application for EU word mark Clustermedizin — Application for registration No 18 203 454

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 February 2021 in Case R 2127/2020-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision. |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
DISMISS and VACATE; and Opinion Filed October 17, 2013.

S

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-13-00651-CV

HI SOON & YOUNG SHIN PARK, Appellant

V.

WELLS FARGO BANK, AS TRUSTEE OF THE ABFC 2004-OPT2 TRUST, Appellee

On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-02647

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices O'Neill, Lang-Miers, and Evans 

Opinion Per Curiam

The Court has before it the parties’ October 10, 2013 joint motion to vacate trial 

judgment and dismiss appellants’ causes of action with prejudice and appellee’s causes of action 

without prejudice. We GRANT the motion, VACATE the judgment of the trial court without 

regard to the merits, and DISMISS appellant’s causes of action with prejudice and appellee’s 

causes of action without prejudice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a).

PER CURIAM

130651F.P05
–2–

Court of Appeals

S

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

HI SOON & YOUNG SHIN PARK, 

Appellants

No. 05-13-00651-CV V.

WELLS FARGO BANK, AS TRUSTEE OF 

THE ABFC 2004-OPT2 TRUST, Appellee

On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-02647.

Opinion delivered Per Curiam. Justices 

O'Neill, Lang-Miers and Evans sitting for 

the Court.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

VACATED without regard to the merits. Appellants’ causes of action are DISMISSED with 

prejudice, and appellee’s causes of action are DISMISSED without prejudice to the refiling of 

the same.

It is ORDERED that each party bear its own costs of this appeal.

Judgment entered this 17th day of October, 2013.

/Elizabeth Lang-Miers/

ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS

JUSTICE
# C_2023015EN.01003401.xml

| 16.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 15/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 15/34

---

Order of the President of the Court of 12 September 2022 — European Commission v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

(Case C-214/22) (1)

(2023/C 15/43)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 191, 10.5.2022.

---
Rev 0 (9/08)

Comments in Response to 

“Final rule; request for comments”

Docket: FAA-2013-0393 Directorate Identifier 2012-CE-025-AD

Comments have been received in response to: “Final rule; request for comments,”

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket and Directorate Identifier entered above. 

(Project engineer: Please review any comments to determine if additional action is warranted.

Once you have made your determination, please fill in the commenter(s) name(s) and check the 

appropriate response below. Include additional information following the appropriate response, 

if necessary. Then include your name and the date in the spaces provided, and return it to the 

AD directorate focal.

The FAA has reviewed comment(s) related to the above FAA Docket that we received from: 

Wermlandsflyg Operations AB, Robert A. Louviaux, Larry Bantle, William Smith, Ruben 

Correa, Aero Air LLC, Air Spray Ltd, Michael Grabbe

A number of commenters made good points, but most can be resolved with AMOCs to prevent 

their fleet from being grounded. We realize the timeline is stringent, and is more stingent than 

Twin Commander originally proposed. However, we do have technical data to support a very

short compliance time. We do agree, though, that the compliance time requirements should have 

included flight hours and flight cycles, not just calendar time. We are addressing this through 

AMOCs instead of superseding the AD. 

(Please check one)

 These comments have not been found to contain any information to warrant reconsideration 

or change of this AD.

 These comments have been found to contain information that warrants consideration of 

additional regulatory action. (SEE Airworthiness Directives Manual 

FAA-IR-M-8040.1 FOR ADDITIONAL ACTION.)

______Kathleen Arrigotti_____ 7 Aug. 2013__

Name: Date:

(This form is part of the official docket file for this AD action.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the balance
sheet of CNL Income Fund III, Ltd. at March 31, 1998, and its statement of
income for the three months then ended and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to the Form 10Q of CNL Income Fund III, Ltd. for the three months
ended March 31, 1998.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       2,653,819
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  220,917
<ALLOWANCES>                                   150,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                      15,671,927
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,876,442
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,930,315
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  16,611,622
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,930,315
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               509,006
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  132,552
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                978,233
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            978,233
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   978,233
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Due to the nature of its industry, CNL Income Fund III, ltd. has an
unclassified balance sheet; therefore, no values are shown above for current
assets and current liabilities.
</FN>
        




</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                               7
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         114,822
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 114,829
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              176
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     114,653
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   114,829
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,750
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   339
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,411
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,411
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 23








                         Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-67941) pertaining to the Pulaski Furniture Corporation 1996 Salaried
Employees'  Stock  Purchase  Plan of our report  dated  December  2, 1999,  with
respect  to the  consolidated  financial  statements  and  schedule  of  Pulaski
Furniture  Corporation  included in the Annual  Report  (Form 10-K) for the year
ended October 31, 1999.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Ernst & Young LLP

Winston-Salem, North Carolina
January 25, 2000
No. D-2634.

#### In re Disbarment of Klingsmith.

Disbarment entered. [For earlier order herein, see 566 U. S. 919.]
# C_2022326EN.01000801.xml

| 29.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/8

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD) (Portugal) lodged on 23 May 2022 — A, S.A. (Portugal) v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira

(Case C-335/22)

(2022/C 326/12)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: A, S.A.

Defendant: Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira

Questions referred

| 1. | Can Article 5(2)(b) of Council Directive 2008/7/EC (1) of 12 February 2008 be interpreted as precluding the application of stamp duty to fees for financial intermediation services provided by a bank in connection with the placement of securities — bonds and commercial papers — issued by various commercial companies, as part of which services the applicant is under an obligation to do all that it can, identifying and making contact with investors, to distribute the securities, obtain orders for subscription or acquisition and, in some cases, acquire the securities on offer? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Can Article 5(2)(b) of Council Directive 2008/7/EC (1) of 12 February 2008 be interpreted as precluding the application of stamp duty to fees for financial intermediation services provided by a bank in connection with the placement of securities — bonds and commercial papers — issued by various commercial companies, as part of which services the applicant is under an obligation to do all that it can, identifying and making contact with investors, to distribute the securities, obtain orders for subscription or acquisition and, in some cases, acquire the securities on offer?

| 2. | Does the answer to the first question referred differ depending on whether the provision of the financial services is a legal requirement or merely optional? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Does the answer to the first question referred differ depending on whether the provision of the financial services is a legal requirement or merely optional?

---

(1)  Council Directive 2008/7/EC of 12 February 2008 concerning indirect taxes on the raising of capital (OJ 2008 L 46, p. 11).

---
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 14-14454

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cr-00006-WS-GRJ-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JAMES RAY WILLIAMS, 

a.k.a. Jason Felix, 

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Florida

________________________

(June 26, 2015)

Before: HULL, WILLIAM PRYOR, and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

Case: 14-14454 Date Filed: 06/26/2015 Page: 1 of 2 
2

Barbara Sanders, appointed counsel for James Ray Williams in this direct 

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Williams 

and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 

18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that 

counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because 

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, 

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Williams’s convictions and 

sentences are AFFIRMED.

Case: 14-14454 Date Filed: 06/26/2015 Page: 2 of 2