alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32**

**Certification ofChief Executive OfficerPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, the undersigned officer of Alliance Imaging, Inc. (the “*Company*”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge,that:

(i)    theaccompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for thequarter ended September 30, 2006 (the “*Report*”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d),as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii)   the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

| Dated: November 9, 2006 |   | /s/ PAUL S.  VIVIANO                                |
|------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|                         |   | Paul S. Viviano                                     |
|                         |   | *Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer* |

 

----

**Certification ofChief Financial OfficerPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, the undersigned officer of Alliance Imaging, Inc. (the “*Company*”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge,that:

(i)    theaccompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for thequarter ended September 30, 2006 (the “*Report*”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d),as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii)   the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

| Dated: November 9, 2006 |   | /s/ HOWARD K.  AIHARA                                   |
|------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------|
|                         |   | Howard K. Aihara                                        |
|                         |   | *Executive Vice President and Chief Financial  Officer* |

 

----
# C_2022002EN.01004302.xml

| 3.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 2/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 2/43

---

Action brought on 21 October 2021 — Mostostal v EUIPO — Polimex — Mostostal (MOSTOSTAL)

(Case T-684/21)

(2022/C 2/60)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Mostostal S.A. (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: C. Saettel, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Polimex — Mostostal S.A. (Warsaw)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark MOSTOSTAL — European Union trade mark No 9 329 848

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 30 July 2021 in Case R 2508/2019-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | declare the European Union trade mark registered on 20 May 2011 under No 9 329 848 valid; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare the European Union trade mark registered on 20 May 2011 under No 9 329 848 valid;

| — | order EUIPO and the intervener to pay the costs in accordance with Article 134(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and the intervener to pay the costs in accordance with Article 134(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 59(3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 59(3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 61 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 61 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
Total Polling Locations:

Election Day:7 1,976 

Early Voting:8 69 

Mail Ballots Transmitted10 Mail Ballots Returned11

170,616 158,321 (92.8% of 

transmitted) 

Mail Ballots Counted12 Mail Ballots Rejected13

-- --

Mail Voting Policies 

Excuse is required for mail voting14

Does not conduct all-mail elections15

Some voters can register as permanent absentee16

EAVS Jurisdictions

67 

Total Registered Voters as of 

Nov. 3, 20201

3,717,798 

Registration Forms Received2*

1,439,361 

Total Confirmation Notices Sent3*

-- 

2020 EAVS Data Brief: Alabama

 Voter Registration

2.7%

5.9%

8.5%

27.2%

55.7%

Mail, Email, Fax

Other

In-Person

Online

Motor Vehicle Dept.

Source of Registration Applications4

 Voter Turnout  Election Technology

In-Person 

Election 

Day Voters 

2,014,242

86.5%

Mail Voters 

300,684

12.9%

In-Person 

Early Voters 

0

0.0%

Other Mode 

14,121

0.6%

Voters Participating By Mode5

67 67 63

0 0 0

Ballot

Marking

Device

Scanner Electronic

Poll

Books

DRE w/o

VVPAT

DRE with

VVPAT

Hand

Count

Technology Used by Jurisdictions9

 Mail Balloting

Notes 

EAVS data and reports may be downloaded at www.eac.gov. 

The data shown are certified as final by state election authorities. 

Responses of “Does not apply,” “Data not available, ” and “Valid 

skip” are shown as zeroes or dashes. Percentages may not sum 

to 100% because of missing data or rounding. 

* Close of registration for 2018 

general election to close of 

registration for 2020 general 

election. 

1 A1a of EAVS. 

2 A3a of EAVS. 

3 A8a of EAVS. 

4 Mail, Email, Fax is A4a. InPerson is A4b. Online is A4c. 

Motor Vehicle Dept. is A4d. 

Other is the sum of A4e–A4l. 

Denominator is A3a. 

5 In-Person Election Day Voters

is F1b. Mail Voters is F1d+F1g

In-Person Early Voters is F1f. 

Other Mode is F1c+F1e+F1h. 

Denominator is sum of F1b–

F1h. 

.

6 F1a of EAVS. Denominator 

is citizen voting age 

population (CVAP). 

7 D3a of EAVS. 

8 D4a of EAVS. 

9 F3a–d, F5a, F6a, F7a, F8a,

and F11a of EAVS. 

10 C1a of EAVS. 

11 C1b of EAVS. 

12 C3a of EAVS. 

13 C4a of EAVS. 

14Q17 of Policy Survey. 

15 Q18 and Q18a of Policy 

Survey. 

16 Q19 of Policy Survey. 

Turnout6

62.4%
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997             SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                      43,317,335              43,317,335
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                               17,569,115              17,569,115
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,950,904               1,950,904
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            66,132,444              66,132,444
<PP&E>                                      19,657,939              19,657,939
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,748,642               3,748,642
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              84,344,805              84,344,805
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       23,941,881              23,941,881
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                       244,050                 244,050
<OTHER-SE>                                  58,473,398              58,473,398
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                84,344,805              84,344,805
<SALES>                                     34,628,577              80,151,773
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            34,628,577              80,151,773
<CGS>                                       23,217,829              52,641,716
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               26,082,378              61,626,320
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             125,648                 495,782
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              8,945,328              23,225,138
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,470,061               4,720,061
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,475,267              18,505,077
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,475,267              18,505,077
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.23                    0.92
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.23                    0.92<F1>
<FN>
<F1>PROFORMA NET INCOME WAS 5,475,267 (0.23 PER SHARE) AND 14,525,077 (0.72 PER
SHARE) RESPECTIVELY.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DAVID GENE LANCASTER,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

TOM L. CAREY, Warden; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellants.

No. 11-17332

D.C. No. 2:08-cv-00051-LKKGGH

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Lawrence K. Karlton, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 10, 2012** 

Before: WARDLAW, CLIFTON, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Defendants appeal from the district court’s denial of their motion for

summary judgment based on qualified immunity in David Gene Lancaster’s 42

U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that prison officials retaliated against him for serving

FILED

SEP 25 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-17332

as a witness to a sexual misconduct complaint filed against a prison staff member. 

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Davis v. City of

Las Vegas, 478 F.3d 1048, 1053 (9th Cir. 2007), and we affirm.

The district court properly denied qualified immunity at this stage of the

proceedings because, assuming that Lancaster’s version of the facts is true,

defendants’ retaliation would constitute a violation of clearly established law and a

reasonable official would not have believed his conduct was lawful. See Jeffers v.

Gomez, 267 F.3d 895, 903, 910 (9th Cir. 2001) (per curiam) (explaining that

“[w]here disputed facts exist . . . we can determine whether the denial of qualified

immunity was appropriate by assuming that the version of the material facts

asserted by the non-moving party is correct” and stating test for qualified

immunity); Pratt v. Rowland, 65 F.3d 802, 806 (9th Cir. 1995) (recognizing that

“the prohibition against retaliatory punishment is ‘clearly established law’ in the

Ninth Circuit, for qualified immunity purposes”).

To the extent that defendants challenge the sufficiency of evidence

supporting the district court’s conclusion that an issue of fact remains as to whether

defendants’ actions were retaliatory, we lack jurisdiction to review that issue. See

Jeffers, 267 F.3d at 903.
3 11-17332

We do not consider on appeal materials that were not before the district

court.

AFFIRMED.
ex10a.htm
































Exhibit 10(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 21 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-141756) pertaining to Lincoln Life & Annuity Variable Annuity Account H, which is incorporated by reference into Post-Effective Amendment No. 20 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-141766) and Amendment No. 241 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-08441), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) April 1, 2014, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New York and (b) April 1, 2014, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life & Annuity Variable Annuity Account H for the registration of interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.













/s/ Ernst & Young LLP












Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


April 1, 2014
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                          OF CORPORATE GENERAL PARTNER

            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The  undersigned,  Robert A. Bourne,  the  President and Treasurer of CNL Realty
Corporation,  the  corporate  general  partner of CNL Income Fund III, Ltd. (the
"Partnership"),  has executed this  certification  in connection with the filing
with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  of the  Partnership's  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  June 30,  2003 (the  "Report").  The
undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



Date:  August 4, 2003                       /s/ Robert A. Bourne
                                            -------------------------
                                            Name:  Robert A. Bourne
                                            Title: President and Treasurer

                                            A signed  original  of this  written
                                            statement  required  by Section  906
                                            has been provided to CNL Income Fund
                                            III,  Ltd.  and will be  retained by
                                            CNL  Income  Fund  III,   Ltd.   and
                                            furnished  to  the   Securities  and
                                            Exchange  Commission  or  its  staff
                                            upon request.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

JEREMY KIRKWOOD

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 20 22

- 2 880

[ November 9, 2023 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fif teenth Judicial Circuit, Palm

Beach County ; Daliah H. Weiss , Judge; L.T. Case No. 21CF007822AMB

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Robert Porter , Assistant Public

Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Alexandra A. Folley,

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

K LINGENSMITH

, C.J., F ORST and K UNTZ , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>           BD
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information
extracted from the financial statements for The
Jones Financial Companies for the 9 months ended
September 24, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-24-1999
<CASH>                                         118,136
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,588,807
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                  0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                           19,326
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                            317,608
<PP&E>                                         222,566
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,413,084
<SHORT-TERM>                                   324,376
<PAYABLES>                                     961,372
<REPOS-SOLD>                                         0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                             41,474
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                              31,142
<LONG-TERM>                                    296,756
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     456,068
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,413,084
<TRADING-REVENUE>                                    0
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                           103,827
<COMMISSIONS>                                1,034,068
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                   18,208
<FEE-REVENUE>                                  143,179
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              40,197
<COMPENSATION>                                 760,614
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                138,290
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     138,290
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   138,290
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
# C_2022398EN.01001301.xml

| 17.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 398/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 398/13

---

Action brought on 18 July 2022 — European Commission v Ireland

(Case C-481/22)

(2022/C 398/16)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: L. Armati and E. Sanfrutos Cano, Agents)

Defendant: Ireland

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare that by failing to take the measures necessary to ensure that water intended for human consumption meets the minimum requirement of the parametric value for Trihalomethanes — Total set out in Annex I, Part B of Council Directive 98/83/EC of 3 November 1998 on the quality of water intended for human consumption (1) (the ‘Directive’) in 21 public water supply zones and in 9 private group water schemes, and that the necessary remedial action is taken as soon as possible to restore the quality of the water intended for human consumption in the aforementioned public water supply zones and private group water schemes and failing to give priority to its enforcement action, having regard inter alia to the extent to which the relevant parametric value has been exceeded and to the potential danger to human health, Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 4(1), in conjunction with Annex I Part B, and Article 8(2) of the Directive; and |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that by failing to take the measures necessary to ensure that water intended for human consumption meets the minimum requirement of the parametric value for Trihalomethanes — Total set out in Annex I, Part B of Council Directive 98/83/EC of 3 November 1998 on the quality of water intended for human consumption (1) (the ‘Directive’) in 21 public water supply zones and in 9 private group water schemes, and that the necessary remedial action is taken as soon as possible to restore the quality of the water intended for human consumption in the aforementioned public water supply zones and private group water schemes and failing to give priority to its enforcement action, having regard inter alia to the extent to which the relevant parametric value has been exceeded and to the potential danger to human health, Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 4(1), in conjunction with Annex I Part B, and Article 8(2) of the Directive; and

| — | order Ireland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order Ireland to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed for transposing the directive expired on 26 December 2003, with stricter requirements applying from 26 December 2008.

---

(1)  OJ L 330, 5.12.1998, p. 32.

---
#### COM. v. CONCORDIA, B.

177 MDA 2017

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/27/2017

CP-06-CR-0000037-2016 (Berks)

Affirmed
EXHIBIT 32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certification

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Abcor
Products, Inc. (the "Company") certifies that:

1.	The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period
ended February 29, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m or 78o(d)); and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

July 8, 2005                           /s/ Jeremy Feakins
                                       ------------------------------------
                                       Jeremy Feakins (Chief Executive
                                        Officer and Chief Financial Officer)