alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DISMISS; Opinion Filed July 11, 2013.

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-12-01343-CV

DONNA GAIL PARKER, Appellant

V.

TURTLE CREEK FINANCIAL GP., LLC AND RANDY DOWDING, Appellees

On Appeal from the 95th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-09-13806-D

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Lang, Myers, and Evans 

Opinion by Justice Evans

Appellant’s brief in this case is overdue. By postcard dated March 12, 2013, we notified 

appellant the time for filing her brief had expired. We directed appellant to file both her brief 

and an extension motion within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to file the brief and 

an extension motion would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date, 

appellant has not filed her brief, an extension motion, or otherwise corresponded with the Court 

regarding the status of her brief. 

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b)(c).

/David Evans/

DAVID EVANS

JUSTICE

121343F.P05
–2–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

DONNA GAIL PARKER, Appellant

No. 05-12-01343-CV V.

TURTLE CREEK FINANCIAL GP., LLC 

AND RANDY DOWDING, Appellees

On Appeal from the 95th Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-09-13806-D.

Opinion delivered by Justice Evans. 

Justices Lang and Myers participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellees TURTLE CREEK FINANCIAL GP., LLC AND 

RANDY DOWDING recover their costs of this appeal from appellant DONNA GAIL PARKER.

Judgment entered this 11th day of July, 2013.

/David W. Evans/

DAVID W. EVANS

JUSTICE
H. R. 8906 

One Hundred Sixteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty 

An Act 

To amend title XXIX of the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize the program 

under such title relating to lifespan respite care. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Lifespan Respite Care Reauthorization Act of 2020’’. 

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF LIFESPAN RESPITE CARE PROGRAM. 

(a) DATA COLLECTION AND REPORTING.—Section 2904 of the 

Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300ii–3) is amended to read 

as follows: 

‘‘SEC. 2904. DATA COLLECTION AND REPORTING. 

‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Each State agency awarded a grant or 

cooperative agreement under section 2902 shall report such data, 

information, and metrics as the Secretary may require for purposes 

of— 

‘‘(1) evaluating State programs and activities funded pursuant to such grant or cooperative agreement, including any 

results pursuant to section 2902(d)(2)(B)(xii); and 

‘‘(2) identifying effective programs and activities funded 

pursuant to section 2902. 

‘‘(b) REPORT.—Not later than October 1, 2023, the Secretary 

shall submit a report to the Committee on Health, Education, 

Labor, and Pensions of the Senate and the Committee on Energy 

and Commerce of the House of Representatives regarding the outcomes of the programs and activities funded pursuant to section 

2902, including any effective programs and activities identified.’’. 

(b) FUNDING.—Section 2905 of the Public Health Service Act 

(42 U.S.C. 300ii–4) is amended by striking ‘‘title’’ and all that 

follows through the period and inserting ‘‘title, $10,000,000 for 

each of fiscal years 2020 through fiscal year 2024.’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF STEVENS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES AS OF JUNE 30, 1999 AND FOR THE SIX MONTHS THEN ENDED
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             129
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,483
<ALLOWANCES>                                       392
<INVENTORY>                                      6,667
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,698
<PP&E>                                           6,839
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,499
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  13,407
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,508
<BONDS>                                          5,363
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           950
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,991)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    13,407
<SALES>                                          5,889
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,889
<CGS>                                            2,926
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,926
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,396
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 356
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     51
<INCOME-TAX>                                         3
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 48
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        48
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01



</TABLE>
EX-10.8



 Exhibit 10.8 

THIS EXHIBIT HAS BEEN REDACTED AND IS THE SUBJECT OF A CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT 

REQUEST PURSUANT TO RULE 24b-2. REDACTED MATERIAL IS MARKED WITH [***] AND HAS 

BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. 

 
 AMENDMENT TO 

EASTMAN – RAYONIER 

CHEMICAL CELLULOSE AGREEMENT 
 THIS
AMENDMENT is effective as of January 1, 2012, and is entered into by and between EASTMAN CHEMICAL COMPANY (“EASTMAN”) and RAYONIER PERFORMANCE FIBERS, LLC (“RAYONIER”), collectively, the “PARTIES.” 

WHEREAS, Rayonier and Eastman entered into that certain Chemical Cellulose Agreement with the effective date of January 1, 2012 (the
“Agreement”); 
 WHEREAS, the Parties desire to amend the Agreement and revise certain terms contained therein. 

NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby amend the Agreement as follows: 

1. Article 3(a) of the Agreement is replaced with the following: 

***, this is a contract whereby EASTMAN agrees to purchase the following quantities of Chemical Cellulose in the years
specified: 
  

					
	 Year
	  	Total Quantity (ADMT)	 	Base Volume (ADMT)
	 2012
	  	***	 	***
	 2013
	  	***	 	***
	 2014
	  	***	 	***
	 2015
	  	***	 	***
	 2016
	  	***	 	***
	 2017 and subsequent years*
	  	***	 	***

  

	*	Unless otherwise terminated as provided under Article 7. 

 Except as amended herein, the remaining provisions
of Article 3 shall continue in full force and effect. 
  

	2.	*** 









 THIS EXHIBIT HAS BEEN REDACTED AND IS THE SUBJECT OF A CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT 

REQUEST PURSUANT TO RULE 24b-2. REDACTED MATERIAL IS MARKED WITH [***] AND HAS 

BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. 

 

 Except as amended herein, the remaining provisions of Article 3 shall
continue in full force and effect. 
 3. Except as amended above, all remaining provisions the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Amendment effective as of the day and year first above written. 

 

									
	EASTMAN CHEMICAL COMPANY	 		 	RAYONIER PERFORMANCE FIBERS, LLC
					
	By:	 	 /s/ Michael A. Berry
	 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Paul Boynton

		 	Name: Michael A. Berry	 		 		 	Name: Paul Boynton
		 	Title: VP, Global Procurement	 		 		 	Title: President
# C_2022191EN.01002501.xml

| 10.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 191/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 191/25

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 8 March 2022 — Criminal proceedings against BK and ZhP

(Case C-176/22)

(2022/C 191/32)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad

Parties to the main proceedings

BK and ZhP

Question referred

Is Article 23 of the Statute of the Court of Justice to be interpreted as imposing an obligation on a national court that has made a request for a preliminary ruling under Article 267 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to stay the main proceedings in their entirety, or is it sufficient to stay only that part of the main proceedings that relates to the question referred for a preliminary ruling?

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>               UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Form 10-K
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                   0000081033
<NAME>                  PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC AND GAS COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER>            1000000

       
<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                           DEC-31-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                              PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                   10,876
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    833
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                       1,459
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                     1,580
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,748
<COMMON>                                     2,563
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      594
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                          1,443
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               4,597
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          588
<PREFERRED>                                     95
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         4,045
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                               0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                        0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                 850
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  100
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                        0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                     50
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                 0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               4,423
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>               14,748
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    5,590
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           407 <F1>
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   4,173
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   4,571
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                      1,019
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               8
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>               1,027
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       423 <F2>
<NET-INCOME>                                   604
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                     10
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  595
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       503
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      309
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                       1,565
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0
<FN>
<F1>  State Income Taxes of $2 and Federal and State Income Taxes for Other
Income of $7 were incorporated into this line item for FDS purposes. In the
referenced financial statements, Total Other Income and Deductions are net of
the above applicable Federal and State income taxes.
<F2>  Total interest expense includes Preferred Securities Dividend 
Requirements.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
No. 11-626.

#### Lozman *v.*City of Riviera Beach, Florida.

C. A. 11th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 565 U. S. 1195.] Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as *amicus curiae*and for divided argument granted.
# C_2021217EN.01005401.xml

| 7.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/54

---

Action brought on 9 April 2021 — Lück v EUIPO — R.H. Investment (MALLE)

(Case T-188/21)

(2021/C 217/69)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Jörg Lück (Hilden, Germany) (represented by: L. Becker, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: R.H. Investment UG (limited liability company) (Erlangen, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark MALLE — EU trade mark No 2 631 166

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 December 2020 in Case R 1393/2020-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision, in conjunction with the decision of the Cancellation Division of 18 May 2020; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision, in conjunction with the decision of the Cancellation Division of 18 May 2020;

| — | order the intervener to pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the intervener to pay all the costs.

Plea in law

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
STEAM ELECTRIC

CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: ________________________________________

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.

SE04360A129
# C_2023164EN.01004201.xml

| 8.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 164/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 164/42

---

Order of the General Court of 16 February 2023 — Cyprus v EUIPO — Cemet (Halime)

(Case T-615/22) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Final dismissal of the application for registration of the trade mark in parallel opposition proceedings - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

(2023/C 164/58)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Republic of Cyprus (represented by: S. Malynicz and C. Milbradt, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Cemet Oy (Helsinki, Finland)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the Republic of Cyprus seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 28 June 2022 (Case R 121/2022-5).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | The Republic of Cyprus and the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall each bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Republic of Cyprus and the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall each bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 432, 14.11.2022.

---
output_FacilityList

FacilityID met_filerural_urban nadmax_dist model_dist radials circles overlap_dist acute hrs elev ratio depdepl phase

01033NEI8522 3000 30 Y Y

01033NEI8522b 3000 30 Y Y

01115NEIALT$4622 3000 30 Y Y

05059NEIART$10783 3000 30 Y Y

05115NEI3AR05115JW 3000 30 Y Y

13077NEI8066 3000 30 Y Y

13133NEI8093 3000 30 Y Y

17031NEI3IL17031Ale 3000 30 Y Y

18003NEIIN00286 3000 30 Y Y

18089NEI3IN18089Jup 3000 30 Y Y

18093NEI3IN18093Rec 3000 30 Y Y

18113NEIIN567 3000 30 Y Y

18169NEI3IN18169Ale 3000 30 Y Y

18173NEI32661 3000 30 Y Y

19163NEI12240 3000 30 Y Y

19163NEI2IA01-089 3000 30 Y Y

21009NEIKY0090065 3000 30 Y Y

21031NEIKY2103100 3000 30 Y Y

21091NEI11360 3000 30 Y Y

21091NEI11362 3000 30 Y Y

21101NEI11365 3000 30 Y Y

21141NEIKY2114100 3000 30 Y Y

21151NEI3KY21151Nov 3000 30 Y Y

21227NEIKY22700135 3000 30 Y Y

26023NEI3MI26023Ale 3000 30 Y Y

26023NEIMIN5957 3000 30 Y Y

29009NEI18317 3000 30 Y Y

29143NEI34464 3000 30 Y Y

29510NEI3MO29510JW 3000 30 Y Y

34007NEI3NJ34007Alu 3000 30 Y Y

36075NEI3NY36075Nov 3000 30 Y Y

36089NEI39458 3000 30 Y Y

36103NEI3AL01123Cre 3000 30 Y Y

39157NEI3OH39157Ale 3000 30 Y Y

39157NEIOHT$6308 3000 30 Y Y

42071NEI3PA42071Alu 3000 30 Y Y

42107NEIPA23-2083 3000 30 Y Y

45015NEI3SC45015JW 3000 30 Y Y

45015NEI41217 3000 30 Y Y

46135NEI790 3000 30 Y Y

47009NEI10933 3000 30 Y Y

47009NEI10933b 3000 30 Y Y

47159NEI3TN47159Wil 3000 30 Y Y

48029NEI7212 3000 30 Y Y

48037NEI3TX48067Alu 3000 30 Y Y

48331NEI6464 3000 30 Y Y

53007NEI42328 3000 30 Y Y

53073NEIWA19906 3000 30 Y Y

54035NEIWV0043 3000 30 Y Y

55039NEI43018 3000 30 Y Y

55117NEI3WI55001JL 3000 30 Y Y

Page 1
output_FacilityList

55117NEIWI4600412 3000 30 Y Y

Page 2
output_FacilityList

pdeppdepl vdep vdepl lscaviscav pop_size user_rcpt bldg_dwring1 aermod cb All_rcpts

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Page 3
output_FacilityList

Y

Page 4
No. 11-10632.

#### Delfín *v.*Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT 12/31/95 AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 12/31/95 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           7,919
<SECURITIES>                                    11,836
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,337
<ALLOWANCES>                                       279
<INVENTORY>                                      7,447
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,016
<PP&E>                                          18,989
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,497
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  45,104
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,532
<BONDS>                                          2,407
<COMMON>                                            35
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,479
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    45,104
<SALES>                                         47,590
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                47,590
<CGS>                                           34,844
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   34,844
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,036
<INCOME-TAX>                                        53
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,953
<DISCONTINUED>                                   1,100
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,053
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.21
        

</TABLE>
# C_2023024EN.01001902.xml

| 23.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/19

---

Appeal brought on 9 May 2022 by Union nationale des indépendants solidaires (UNIS) against the order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) delivered on 8 March 2022 in Case T-431/21 UNIS v Commission

(Case C-324/22 P)

(2023/C 24/26)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Union nationale des indépendants solidaires (UNIS) (represented by: F. Ortega, avocat)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

By order of 1 December 2022, the Court (Sixth Chamber) dismissed the appeal as manifestly unfounded and ordered the appellant to bear its own costs.

---
#### ZHE ZHANG, Petitioner v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS, III, U.S. Attorney General, Respondent

No. 16-60681 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed January 4, 2018

Zhe Zhang, Pro Se

Janice Kay Redfern, Esq., Sarah Abigail Byrd, Trial Attorney, Office of Immigration Litigation, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for Respondent

Before BARKSDALE, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Zhe Zhang, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China and proceeding *pro se,*petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) decision affirming the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) denial of his application for asylum and withholding of removal (his claim for relief under the Convention Against Torture was waived on his appeal to the BIA). He contends: the IJ’s and BIA’s adverse credibility determinations were not supported by substantial evidence; and he corroborated his credible, consistent, and detailed testimony with sufficient documentary evidence.

Where, as here, the. BIA adopts and affirms the IJ’s decision, in addition to providing its own review of the evidence and the law, our court has authority to review both the BIA’s and IJ’s decisions. *E.g., Wang v. Holder,*569 F.3d 531, 536 (5th Cir. 2009). Factual findings, including credibility determinations, are reviewed for substantial evidence. *Id.*(citing *Chun v. INS,*40 F.3d 76, 78 (5th Cir. 1994)). Under this highly deferential standard, our court will not reach a different result unless “the evidence was so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could conclude against it”. *Id.*at 537 (citing *INS v. Elias-Zacarias,*502 U.S. 478, 483-84, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992)).

The IJ’s and BIA’s adverse credibility determinations are supported by substantial evidence, including, *inter alia,*inconsistencies in Zhang’s application, *inter alia,*for asylum, his testimony and demeanor at the hearing on his application, his misstatements on his visa application regarding past arrests, and the implausibility of his assertion that he retained his government job and full salary despite his arrests and year-long detention at a labor *833camp. *E.g., id.*at 537-40; *Carbajal-Gonzalez v. INS,*78 F.3d 194, 197 (5th Cir. 1996). Additionally, Zhang did not corroborate his claims with reasonably available evidence.

Because Zhang has not shown, under the totality of the circumstances, the evidence is so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find him credible, we defer to the IJ’s and BIA’s adverse credibility determinations. *E.g., Wang,*569 F.3d at 538-39. In the light of these adverse credibility determinations, Zhang has not shown the BIA erred in affirming denial of Zhang’s application for asylum and withholding of removal. *E.g., Dayo v. Holder,*687 F.3d 653, 657-59 (5th Cir. 2012); *Chun v. INS,*40 F.3d 76, 78-79 (5th Cir. 1994).

DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.