alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ERNST & YOUNG LLP   [LOGO]    [] 2000 Wachovia Building    [] Phone 910 725 0611
                                 301 North Main Street        Fax:  910 725 4327
                                 Winston-Salem
                                 North Carolina 27111


                        Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Post Effective Amendment
No. 1 to Registration  Statement Number 2-75876 on Form S-8 dated
January 20, 1983, of our report  dated  November  26,  1997 with respect
to the  consolidated  financial statements  and schedule  included in
the Annual  Report on Form 10-K of Pulaski Furniture Corporation for the
year ended November 2, 1997.

                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Winston-Salem, North Carolina
January 23, 1998
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 45 (Friday, March 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 10606]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5712]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration


Notice of Comment Period Extension for Updated Draft Air Quality 
Conformity Determination, for Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, 
Seattle, WA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration.

ACTION: Notice of comment period extension.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On February 7, 1997, the Federal Aviation Administration and 
the Port of Seattle, acting as joint lead agencies, released for public 
and agency review and comment, a Draft Supplemental Environmental 
Impact Statement (DSEIS) for the Master Plan Update at Seattle-Tacoma 
International Airport. This DSEIS is a combined Federal National 
Environmental Policy Act and Washington State Environmental Policy Act 
document.
    The comment period on the Updated Draft Air Quality Conformity 
Determination, contained in the DSEIS has been extended to March 31, 
1997. Therefore, comments on both the Updated Draft Air Quality 
Conformity Determination and the DSEIS are due on March 31, 1997. 
Comments should be sent to Mr. Dennis Ossenkop, ANM-611, Federal 
Aviation Administration, Northwest Mountain Region, Airports Division, 
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, WA 98055-4056.

    Issued in Renton, Washington on February 28, 1997.
Matthew Cavanaugh,
Acting Manager, Airports Division, Federal Aviation Administration, 
Northwest Mountain Region, Renton, Washington.
[FR Doc. 97-5712 Filed 3-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
# C_2023223EN.01000602.xml

| 26.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 223/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 223/6

---

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 April 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — GO and Others v Regione Lazio

(Case C-482/22, (1) Associazione Raggio Verde)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Articles 53 and 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Article 267 TFEU - Scope of the obligation on national courts or tribunals of last instance to make a reference for a preliminary ruling - Exceptions to that obligation - Criteria - Situations in which the correct interpretation of EU law is so obvious as to leave no scope for any reasonable doubt - Condition related to the national court or tribunal of last instance being convinced that the matter would be equally obvious to the other courts or tribunals of last instance of the Member States and to the Court of Justice)

(2023/C 223/08)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: GO, UL, KC, PE, HY, EM, Associazione Raggio Verde

Defendant: Regione Lazio

Operative part of the order

Article 267 TFEU must be interpreted as meaning that a national court or tribunal against whose decisions there is no judicial remedy under national law may refrain from referring to the Court a question concerning the interpretation of EU law and take upon itself the responsibility for resolving it where the correct interpretation of EU law is so obvious as to leave no scope for any reasonable doubt. Whether such a possibility exists must be assessed in the light of the specific characteristics of EU law, the particular difficulties to which its interpretation gives rise and the risk of divergences in judicial decisions within the European Union.

That national court or tribunal is not required to establish in detail that the other courts or tribunals of last instance of the Member States and the Court would give the same interpretation, but must have obtained the conviction, according to an assessment which takes account of those factors, that the matter would be equally obvious to those other national courts or tribunals and to the Court.

---

(1)  Date lodged: 14.7.2022.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           2,410
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,760
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,164
<PP&E>                                          91,400
<DEPRECIATION>                                (23,157)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  75,189
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,840
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            90
<OTHER-SE>                                      45,358
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    75,189
<SALES>                                         12,065
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,122
<CGS>                                            9,319
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,989
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,714
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 956
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    133
<INCOME-TAX>                                       132
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  1
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         1
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of

MICHAEL J. CHUTZ

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT

FROM ADMINISTRATIVE SUSPENSION

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 49 DB 2019 (No. 44 RST 2019)

Attorney Registration No. 48529

(Allegheny County)

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 4

th day of June, 2019, the Report and Recommendation of 

Disciplinary Board Member dated May 23, 2019, is approved and it is ORDERED that

Michael J. Chutz, who has been on Administrative Suspension, has never been 

suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that he has the moral qualifications, 

competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, 

shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this 

Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing 

of this matter shall be paid by the Petitioner.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 32.2

                   Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S)1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of NHT, Inc., General Partner for National
Housing Trust Limited Partnership (the "Company:") hereby certifies, to such
officer's knowledge, that:

   (i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

   (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: August 14, 2003                   By: /s/ Susan E. Basting
                                            ----------------------------------
                                            Susan E. Basting, Treasurer
                                            and Chief Financial Officer
                                            NHT, Inc., General Partner for
                                            National Housing Trust Limited
                                            Partnership


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S. C (S)1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before
or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in
such filing.

                                      22
No. 11-10510.

#### Bowen *v.*Jones, Warden.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# C_2023179EN.01001301.xml

| 22.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/13

---

Appeal brought on 18 July 2022 by VZ against the order of the General Court (President) delivered on 19 May 2022 in Case T-127/22 AJ, VZ v Council of the European Union, European Commission, European External Action Service (EEAS) and Eulex Kosovo

(Case C-489/22 P)

(2023/C 179/19)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: VZ (represented by: P. Koutrakos, dikigoros, F. Randolph, advocaat, and J. Stojsavljevic-Savic, Solicitor)

Other parties to the proceedings: Council of the European Union, European Commission, European External Action Service (EEAS), Eulex Kosovo

By order of 31 March 2023, the Court of Justice (Sixth Chamber) held that the appeal was dismissed due to a manifest lack of jurisdiction of the Court and that VZ should bear her own costs.

---
# C_2023104EN.01003401.xml

| 20.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 104/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 104/34

---

Order of the General Court of 2 February 2023 — Motel One v EUIPO — Apartment One (APART MENT ONE SLEEP CLEVER.)

(Case T-15/22) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark APART MENT ONE SLEEP CLEVER - Earlier EU figurative marks be one and motel one - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

(2023/C 104/52)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Motel One GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by: M. Hartmann, S. Fröhlich and H. Lerchl, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Eberl and T. Klee, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Apartment One GbR (Grasbrunn, Germany)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 20 October 2021 (Case R 564/2021-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Motel One GmbH and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal, Apartment One GbR.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | Motel One GmbH shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Motel One GmbH shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  
  OJ C 84, 21.2.2022.

---
No. 11-7424.

#### Rigo Ramirez *v.*California.

Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
# C_2023261EN.01000401.xml

| 24.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 261/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 261/4

---

Order of the President of the Court of 11 March 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék — Hungary) — DIGI Távközlési és Szolgáltató Kft. v Nemzeti Média- és Hírközlési Hatóság

(Case C-460/22, (1) DIGI)

(2023/C 261/08)

Language of the case: Hungarian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 432, 14.11.2022.

---
# C_2022340EN.01004302.xml

| 5.9.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 340/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.9.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 340/43

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 14 July 2022 — Telefónica de España v Commission

(Case T-170/22 R)

(Interim relief - Public contracts for services - Trans-European Services for Telematics between Administrations (TESTA) - Application for interim measures - Lack of urgency)

(2022/C 340/61)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Telefónica de España, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: F. González Díaz, J. Blanco Carol, lawyers, and P. Stuart, Barrister)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. André and M. Ilkova, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its application based on Articles 278 and 279 TFEU, the applicant seeks, first, suspension of the operation of the decision of the European Commission of 21 January 2022 relating to the Call for Tenders DIGIT/A 3/PR/2019/010, entitled ‘Trans-European Services for Telematics between Administrations (TESTA)’, informing the applicant that its tender was not successful in the procurement procedure and announcing the imminent signing of the contract with the successful tenderer and, secondly, an order requiring the Commission to suspend the signing of that contract.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The order of 1 April 2022, Telefónica de España v Commission (T-170/22 R), is cancelled. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The order of 1 April 2022, Telefónica de España v Commission (T-170/22 R), is cancelled.

| 3. | There is no longer any need to rule on the application to intervene lodged by the company BT Global Services Belgium BV. |
| --- | --- |

3.

There is no longer any need to rule on the application to intervene lodged by the company BT Global Services Belgium BV.

| 4. | The costs are reserved, with the exception of those incurred by the company BT Global Services Belgium BV. It shall bear the costs in connection with its application to intervene. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The costs are reserved, with the exception of those incurred by the company BT Global Services Belgium BV. It shall bear the costs in connection with its application to intervene.

---
# C_2023121EN.01000201.xml

| 3.4.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 121/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 121/2

---

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 February 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca de Coimbra — Juízo do Trabalho da Figueira da Foz — Portugal) — KI v YB, JN

(Case C-483/22, (1) KI (Transfer of a Portuguese notary’s office))

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Requirement to present the factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings - Lack of sufficient information - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2023/C 121/02)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Tribunal Judicial da Comarca de Coimbra — Juízo do Trabalho da Figueira da Foz

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: KI

Defendants: YB, JN

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca de Coimbra — Juízo do Trabalho da Figueira da Foz (District Court, Coimbra — Employment Tribunal, Figueira da Foz, Portugal) by decision of 7 July 2021 is manifestly inadmissible.

---

(1)  Date of filing: 19.7.2022.

---
No. 11-10541.

#### Mays *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
#### OCWEN LOAN SERVICING v. GANGADEEN, S.

723 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/26/2017

No. 2011-10742 (Monroe)

Affirmed
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-29-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-29-1995
<CASH>                                           1,722
<SECURITIES>                                        15
<RECEIVABLES>                                   35,674
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     40,409
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                78,805
<PP&E>                                          85,013
<DEPRECIATION>                                  46,119
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 118,676
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,017
<BONDS>                                         29,355
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,827
<OTHER-SE>                                      50,114
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   118,676
<SALES>                                        172,842
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               172,842
<CGS>                                          138,846
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  163,499
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   757
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,710
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,633
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,158
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,475
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,475
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.56
        

</TABLE>
(logo)**Grant Thornton**

 

 

**GrantThornton LLP**

201 S College Street, 

Suite 2500

Charlotte,NC 28244-0100

 

T704.632.3500

F704.334.7701

www.GrantThornton.com

 

 

**REPORTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

 

Boardof Directors

TrimontReal Estate Advisors, LLC:

 

 

Wehaveexaminedmanagement’sassertion,includedintheaccompanyingManagement’sReporton Assessment of Compliance with SEC Regulation AB Servicing Criteria(“Management’s Report”), that **Trimont Real Estate Advisors, LLC**(the“Company” or “Trimont”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item1122(d) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for thePrimary Servicer Platform (the “Platform”) as ofandfortheyearendedDecember31,2017,excludingcriteria1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(4)(ii), and1122(d)(4)(xv) which management has determinedare not applicable to the activities performed by the Company with respect tothe Platform. The Platform consists of asset-backed transactions and securitiesdefined by management in Exhibit B of Management’s Report. Management isresponsible for the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicingcriteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertionabout the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for thePlatform based on ourexamination.

 

Ourexamination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the PublicCompany Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and in accordance withattestation standards establishedbytheAmericanInstituteofCertifiedPublicAccountants,and,accordingly,included examining, on a test basis, evidence about theCompany’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for the Platformand performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in thecircumstances. Our examination included testing selected asset-backedtransactions and securities constituting the Platform and evaluating whetherthe Company performedservicingactivitiesrelatedtothosetransactionsandsecuritiesincompliancewiththeapplicable servicing criteria for the period covered by this report.Accordingly, our testing may not have included servicing activities related toeach asset-backed transaction or security constituting the Platform. Further,our examination was not designed to detect material noncompliance that may haveoccurred prior to the period covered by this report and that may have affectedthe Company’s servicing activities during the period covered by this report. Webelievethatourexaminationprovidesareasonablebasisforouropinion.Ourexaminationdoes not provide a legal determination onthe Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria.

 

Inour opinion, management’s assertion that Trimont Real Estate Advisors, LLCcomplied with theaforementionedapplicableservicingcriteriaasofandfortheyearendedDecember31,2017for the Primary Servicer Platform is fairly stated, in all materialrespects.

 

 

/s/Grant Thornton LLP

Charlotte,North Carolina 

February26, 2018

 

 

GrantThornton LLP

U.S.member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd
No. 11-10566.

#### Consalvo *v.*Tucker, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
logo) Rialto

CAPITAL

 

 

**2018 Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance (Item1123)**

 

 

Pooling and ServicingAgreement (the "Pooling and Servicing Agreement") dated as of February1, 2015 by and among Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc. asDepositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Master Servicer, RialtoCapital Advisors, LLC as successor Special Servicer to Midland Loan Services, aDivision of PNC Bank, National Association as Special Servicer, Park BridgeLender Services LLC as Operating Advisor, Citibank, N.A. as CertificateAdministrator, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas as Trustee, relating tothe Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc., Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-GC27 **(CCCMT 2015-GC27)**

 

The undersigned, a dulyauthorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer (the"Special Servicer") herein certifies to the following:

 

1.      All servicing activities andperformance of such servicing activities under the Pooling and ServicingAgreement are performed on behalf of the Special Servicer.

 

2.      A review of the servicingactivities and performance by the Special Servicer for the period of July 5,2018 through December 31, 2018 (the "Reporting Period"), under thePooling and Servicing Agreement has been conducted under my supervision.

 

3.      To the best of my knowledge, basedon such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations underthe terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in all material respects forthe Reporting Period and if there has been a failure to fulfill any suchobligations in any material respect, each failure and the nature and status thereofhas been specifically identified herein.

 

 

Certifiedby: /s/ Adam Singer

AdamSinger, Managing Director 

 

Date:March 1, 2019