alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Total Polling Locations:

Election Day:7 9,155 

Early Voting:8 91 

Mail Ballots Transmitted10 Mail Ballots Returned11

3,120,999 2,653,688 (85.0% of 

transmitted) 

Mail Ballots Counted12 Mail Ballots Rejected13

2,619,517 (98.7% of 

returned)

34,171 (1.3% of 

returned) 

Mail Voting Policies 

Excuse is required for mail voting14

Does not conduct all-mail elections15

Any voter can register as permanent absentee16

EAVS Jurisdictions

67 

Total Registered Voters as of 

Nov. 3, 20201

9,035,061 

Registration Forms Received2*

3,814,150 

Total Confirmation Notices Sent3*

753,942 

2020 EAVS Data Brief: Pennsylvania

 Voter Registration

1.1%

9.3%

12.1%

32.5%

45.0%

In-Person

Mail, Email, Fax

Other

Online

Motor Vehicle Dept.

Source of Registration Applications4

 Voter Turnout  Election Technology

In-Person 

Election 

Day Voters 

4,214,277

60.4%

Mail Voters 

2,623,867

37.6%

In-Person 

Early Voters 

0

0.0%

Other Mode 

135,807

1.9%

Voters Participating By Mode5

67

59

10

0 0 0

Scanner Ballot

Marking

Device

Electronic

Poll

Books

DRE w/o

VVPAT

DRE with

VVPAT

Hand

Count

Technology Used by Jurisdictions9

 Mail Balloting

Notes 

EAVS data and reports may be downloaded at www.eac.gov. 

The data shown are certified as final by state election authorities. 

Responses of “Does not apply,” “Data not available, ” and “Valid 

skip” are shown as zeroes or dashes. Percentages may not sum 

to 100% because of missing data or rounding. 

* Close of registration for 2018 

general election to close of 

registration for 2020 general 

election. 

1 A1a of EAVS. 

2 A3a of EAVS. 

3 A8a of EAVS. 

4 Mail, Email, Fax is A4a. InPerson is A4b. Online is A4c. 

Motor Vehicle Dept. is A4d. 

Other is the sum of A4e–A4l. 

Denominator is A3a. 

5 In-Person Election Day Voters 

is F1b. Mail Voters is F1d+F1g. 

In-Person Early Voters is F1f. 

Other Mode is F1c+F1e+F1h. 

Denominator is sum of F1b–

F1h. 

6 F1a of EAVS. Denominator 

is citizen voting age 

population (CVAP). 

7 D3a of EAVS. 

8 D4a of EAVS. 

9 F3a–d, F5a, F6a, F7a, F8a, 

and F11a of EAVS. 

10 C1a of EAVS. 

11 C1b of EAVS. 

12 C3a of EAVS. 

13 C4a of EAVS. 

14Q17 of Policy Survey. 

15 Q18 and Q18a of Policy 

Survey. 

16 Q19 of Policy Survey. 

Turnout 

71.1%

6
10,884

0

6,317

17,201

BallotsCounted

99

122

0

221

BallotsRejected

NORTHCAROLINA

Mail,Fax,Email

Election/Registrar's

Office

Internet

DM

V

Public

Assistance

Office

DisabilitiesAgency

Military

RecruitmentOffice

OtherState

Agency

RegistrationDrives

Registration:Other

1,039,999

1,108,923

741,023

350,933

80,601

3,050

6,099

2100

RegistrationFormSource

TotalRegisteredVoters

6,924,469

SectionA-VoterRegistration

RegistrationFormsReceived

3,330,649

ConfirmationNotificationsSent

1,330,264

Polling

Place

UOCAVA Absentee Provisional

Ballot

EarlyVote

Center

Voteby

Mail

Turnout:

Other

1,594,667

2,876,697

174,401

17,422 27,008 79,932 0

SectionF-TurnoutbyMethod

CountedFull Counted

Part

Rejected Provisional:

Other

21,717

33,756

5,170

0

SectionE-ProvisionalBallots

UniformedService

Non-militaryOverseas

Other

SectionB-UOCAVA

8,563

12,884

0

21,447

BallotsTransmitted

TOTAL TOTAL

ProvisionalBallotTotal:60,643 TurnoutTotal:4,690,195

Select: NORTHCAROLI..

TOTAL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                          

  

2016EAVSDataBrief 

U i
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 23.4

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
3TEC Energy Corporation:


We consent to the use of our report included and incorporated by reference
herein and to the reference to our firm under the heading "Experts" in the
registration statement.


Our report refers to a change in the method of accounting for derivative
instruments and hedging activities, effective January 1, 2001.

/s/ KPMG LLP
-------------------------------
KPMG LLP

Houston, Texas

April 29, 2003
KENNETH NELSON

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 4429

_________ ____________________/

Opinion filed January 5, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Columbia County

. Leandra G. Johnson , Judge

.

Kenneth Nelson, pro se

, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, OSTERHAUS, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE COMPANY FOR THE SIX MONTHS
ENDED JANUARY 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FORM 10-QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JANUARY 31, 1996.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                              AUG-1-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       3,620,202
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  430,732
<ALLOWANCES>                                    17,000
<INVENTORY>                                     30,603
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,385,504
<PP&E>                                       3,917,707
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,525,579
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,211,486
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          955,586
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          833,333
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        29,830
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,491,113
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,211,486
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,739,761
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,769,543
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (5,665)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (20,927)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (20,927)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (20,927)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
## MA**TERIA LS NOT INCLUDED IN** 

**AI RWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (A**  **D) DOCKET**

**FAA -**  **2012 -**  **1214** Docket Number
**2011 -**  **SW -**  **071 -** **AD** Directorate Identifier Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket Eurocopter Al ert Service Bulletin No. EC155 - 53A031, Revision 1, dated September 21, 2011; ASB No. AS365 - 53.00.50, Revision 1, dated September 21, 2011 ; or ASB No. AS366 - 53.11, Revision 1, dated September 21, 2011 . 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region Rules Docket 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663 Fort W orth, Texas 76137 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
#### A.L. v. S.P.

3862 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/27/2017

1610V7277 (Philadelphia)

Affirmed
# wv 

# m

WASTE MANAGEMENT 

## REt,LE14`EG ` bPCJI As'? PLAWIING S

~ 

## G. 

# 14 , tlA" 16 PH 6: 03 SKYLINE RECYCLING AND DISPOSAL FACILITY

1201 North Central Ave. Ferris, Texas 75125 (972) 842-5892 Fax (972) 842-5873
May 13, 2014 Mr. Jeff Robinson Air Permits Section Chief United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 6 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200 Dallas, TX 75202-2733
RE: Selection of GHG PSD Permitting Authority for Greenhouse Gas (GHG) PSD Permit Application for the Skyline Landfill Expansion Project, Dallas & Ellis Counties, Texas Submitted December 6, 2013 Dear Mr. Robinson: The purpose of this letter is to inform you that Waste Management of Texas, Inc., the owner/operator of the Skyline Landfill located in Dallas & Ellis Counties, Texas, wishes to select the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) as the permitting authority for the GHG PSD Permit Application for the Skyline Landfill Expansion Project, which was submitted to EPA, Region 6, on December 6, 2014. We are aware that the TCEQ will not have the authority to propose or issue a GHG PSD permit until the FIP rescission is effective, 30 days afrer publication of the EPA's final rule in the Federal Register, and that TCEQ must receive an application directly from Waste Management of Texas, Inc. Please transfer the GHG PSD Permit Application for the Skyline Landfill Expansion Project to the TCEQ and update the EPA GHG permitting website to reflect the transfer. If you have any questions regarding this election or the underlying air permit application, please contact our consultant, Leslie C. Wong of Golder Associates, Inc., at 281-821-6868 or leslie wong@

~ , older.com

. Sincerely,

Steve Jacobs Area Director of Disposal Operations Waste Management of Texas, Inc. Cc: Leslie C. Wong, Golder Paula Carboni, Skyline Landfill David Thorley, Waste Mangement
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

____________________

No. 95-30536

Summary Calendar

____________________

RUCHELLE CINQUE MAGEE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

BRUCE BICKHAM, INC.; DELOS JOHNSON; 

DUANE BLAIR, Sheriff of Washington Parish,

Defendants-Appellees.

____________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 93-CV-3263 E

 

September 20, 1996

Before SMITH, DUHÉ, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*
- 2 -

Ruchell Cinque Magee, California prisoner #A92051, appeals an

adverse summary judgment. We review that judgment de novo,

applying the same standard used by the district court. E.g.,

Elliot v. Lynn, 38 F.3d 188, 190 (5th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 115

S. Ct. 1976 (1995). 

This notwithstanding, we will not raise and otherwise address

legal issues that the appellant has failed to assert. When an

appellant fails to identify any error in the district court’s

analysis, it is the same as if the appellant had not appealed the

judgment. Brinkman v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d

744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). Magee does not address the merits of the

district court’s opinion. He contends instead that res judicata

should not apply to bar his claim. The district court, however,

dismissed Magee’s claim not only on res judicata, but also on

jurisdictional grounds.

In any event, the district court concluded correctly that it

lacked jurisdiction to entertain a collateral attack on state court

judgments. Liedtke v. State Bar of Texas, 18 F.3d 315, 317 (5th

Cir.) cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 271 (1994). Magee’s §1983 claim is

“inextricably intertwined” with the state court judgments; thus,

the district court lacked jurisdiction to consider his complaint.

Reed v. Terrel, 759 F.2d 472, 473-74 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 474

U.S. 946 (1985). 
- 3 -

Magee’s motions for appointment of counsel, appointment of a

paralegal or investigator, production and inspection of documents

and records, to reinstate his appeal, and for judicial notice of

the record are DENIED.

Magee is cautioned that any additional frivolous appeals filed

by him will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid

sanctions, he is cautioned further to review any pending appeals to

ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous because

they have been previously decided by this court.

APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTIONS DENIED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED
<PAGE>




                       Securities and Exchange Commission
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                   -----------

                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT
                     PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                                November 12, 2002
                Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)


                        SIZELER PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC.
             (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)


<TABLE>
<S>                                         <C>                              <C>
              MARYLAND                      1-9349                           72-1082589
     (State of Incorporation)       (Commission File Number)      (IRS Employer Identification Number)
</TABLE>


                             2542 WILLIAMS BOULEVARD
                             KENNER, LOUISIANA 70062
    (Address, including zip code, of Registrant's Principal Executive Office)


                                 (504) 471-6200
              (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

                                  Page 1 of 3

<PAGE>


ITEM 7. Financial Statements, Pro Forma Financial Information and Exhibits

(c) Exhibits.

Exhibit 99.1      Transmittal Letter
Exhibit 99.2      Certificate of Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 99.3      Certificate of Chief Financial Officer

ITEM 9.  Regulation FD Disclosure

     Registrant filed as correspondence accompanying its Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for its fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2002 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on November 12, 2002, the transmittal letter
and certificates attached hereto as Exhibits 99.1, 99.2 and 99.3.

                                   SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

Date:    November 12, 2002

                                              SIZELER PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC.
                                              --------------------------------
                                                      (Registrant)


                                              By:  /s/ Robert A. Whelan
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                       Robert A. Whelan
                                                       Chief Financial Officer

                                  Page 2 of 3

<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit Index

Exhibit No.       Description
-----------       -----------

99.1              Transmittal Letter
99.2              Certificate of Chief Executive Officer
99.3              Certificate of Chief Financial Officer

                                  Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned officer of Fuda Group (USA) Corporation (the "Company"), hereby
certify to my knowledge that:



The Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2015
of the Company fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.



| | /s/ Xiaobin Wu          
| | ------------------------
| | Chief Executive Officer,
| | Chief Financial Officer 



Date: April 14, 2016
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.5

                           CONSENT OF LEHMAN BROTHERS
                           --------------------------

     We hereby consent to the use of our opinion letter dated February 2, 2003
to the Board of Directors of Plains Exploration & Production Company (the
"Company") attached as Annex B to the Company's Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus
on Form S-4 (the "Prospectus") and to the references to our firm in the
Prospectus under the headings "Questions and Answers About the Merger,"
"Opinions of Financial Advisors," "Background of the Merger," "Reasons for the
Merger--Plains," "Opinion of Plains' Financial Advisor," and "Representations
and Warranties of Parent and Merger Sub." In giving such consent, we do not
admit that we come within the category of persons whose consent is required
under Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission thereunder and we do not
thereby admit that we are experts with respect to any part of the Registration
Statement under the meaning of the term "expert" as used in the Securities Act.

                                LEHMAN BROTHERS INC.

                                /s/ Lehman Brothers Inc.
                                -------------------------------

New York, New York
April 29, 2003
EX-10.15



 Exhibit 10.15 

ASSUMPTION OF EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT dated as of October 31, 2013 (this “Assumption”) by LQ MANAGEMENT L.L.C., a Delaware limited
liability company (“LQ Management”). 
 BACKGROUND 

Reference is made to that certain Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement dated as of August 20, 2003 by and between Wyndham
International, Inc. (“Wyndham”) and Mark Chloupek, as supplemented by that certain letter dated April 17, 2005 (collectively, the “Employment Agreement”). 

ASSUMPTION 
 LQ Management
hereby assumes all of Wyndham’s duties and obligations with respect to the Employment Agreement. 
 LQ Management hereby acknowledges
that Wyndham is released from all duties and obligations with respect to the Employment Agreement and has no further liability under the Employment Agreement. 

This Assumption shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of New York. 

This Assumption may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which when so executed and delivered shall be deemed an original, but all
of which taken together shall constitute but one and the same instrument. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, LQ Management has duly executed this instrument as of the day first above
written. 
  

			
	 LQ MANAGEMENT L.L.C.,
 a
Delaware limited liability company

	
	 By: Blackstone Real Estate Acquisitions IV L.L.C.,

a Delaware limited liability company, its manager

		
	By:	 	 /s/ William J. Stein

	Name:	 	William J. Stein
	Title:	 	Senior Managing Director


  

	
	Acknowledged and Agreed to:
	
	 /s/ Mark Chloupek

	Mark Chloupek

 [Signature Page to Assumption of Employment Agreement]
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fredrick HAGEN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-50090

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted February 13, 2018 *

Filed February 16, 2018

Michael Gregory Freedman, L. Ashley Aull, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, DOJ — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Fredrick Hagen, Pro Se

Before: LEAVY, FERNANDEZ, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Fredrick Hagen appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the revocation of probation and the 16-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Ha-gen’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Hagen the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the revocation and sentence.

We remand the case to the district court with instructions to correct the judgment to reflect the revocation of probation, rather than supervised release.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED; REMANDED to correct the judgment.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheet and Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           5,260
<SECURITIES>                                     3,592
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,421
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (935)
<INVENTORY>                                     20,339
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                59,064
<PP&E>                                          35,258
<DEPRECIATION>                                (21,046)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 160,022
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,748
<BONDS>                                         95,441
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            7,704
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           162
<OTHER-SE>                                      30,513
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   160,022
<SALES>                                         81,770
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                81,770
<CGS>                                           44,731
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   44,731
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                27,318
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    75
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,707
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,006
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,218
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,788
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,301
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08
        

</TABLE>