alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8805 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify rules related to 

rents received by real estate investment trusts from related parties. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 20, 2020 

Mr. SCHNEIDER (for himself and Mr. LAHOOD) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify 

rules related to rents received by real estate investment 

trusts from related parties. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Retail Revitalization 

5 Act of 2020’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF RULES RELATED TO RENTS RE7 CEIVED BY REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT 

8 TRUSTS FROM RELATED PARTIES. 

9 (a) INCREASE IN PERMISSIBLE OWNERSHIP PER10 CENTAGE.—Section 856(d)(2)(B) of the Internal Revenue 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8805 IH

1 Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘10 percent or 

2 more’’ each place it appears and inserting ‘‘more than 50 

3 percent’’. 

4 (b) MODIFICATION OF RULES FOR CONSTRUCTIVE

5 OWNERSHIP OF STOCK.—Section 856(d)(5) of such Code 

6 is amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘ ‘10 percent’ shall be sub8 stituted for ‘50 percent’ ’’ in subparagraph (A) and 

9 inserting ‘‘ ‘more than 50 percent’ shall be sub10 stituted for ‘50 percent or more’ ’’, 

11 (2) by striking ‘‘25 percent or more’’ in sub12 paragraph (B) and inserting ‘‘more than 50 per13 cent’’, and 

14 (3) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of subpara15 graph (A), by striking the period at the end of sub16 paragraph (B) and inserting ‘‘, and’’, and by adding 

17 at the end the following new subparagraph: 

18 ‘‘(C) section 318(a)(5)(C) shall be applied 

19 by substituting ‘paragraph (2) or (3)’ for ‘para20 graph (2)’.’’. 

21 (c) MODIFICATION OF RULES FOR TAXABLE REIT 

22 SUBSIDIARIES.—Section 856(d)(8)(A)(i) of such Code is 

23 amended by striking ‘‘90 percent’’ and inserting ‘‘50 per24 cent’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 8805 IH

1 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall apply to taxable years ending after the 

3 date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the  Quarterly Report of Air Methods Corporation (the
"Company")  on  Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I certify,
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  Sec.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result of operations of the
Company.


/s/Aaron  D.  Todd
----------------------------
Aaron D. Todd
Chief Executive Officer
May 10, 2005

/s/Trent  J.  Carman
----------------------------
Trent J. Carman
Chief Financial Officer
May 10, 2005


A  signed  original  of  this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  Air  Methods  Corporation  and will be retained by Air Methods and
furnished  to  the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
ex10-21.htm


Exhibit 10.21


 


FIRST AMENDMENT TO LOCK-UP AGREEMENT


 







 


This First Amendment to the Lock-Up Agreement is executed on this 25th day of March, 2014.  Reference is made to that certain the Lock-Up Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated June 30, 2011, by and between, Qiang Liu, a shareholder of the Company (the “Holder”) and Nova LifeStyle, Inc.,  a Nevada corporation (the “Company”).  Any capitalized terms in this amendment not otherwise defined shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Lock-Up Agreement (the “Agreement”).


 


WHEREAS, the parties agree that the definition of Lock-Up Period in the Agreement is not clear with respect to the situation of an Offering closing within one year from the date of the Agreement;







WHEREAS, the parties further agree to clarify the lock up period if the closing of an Offering does occur within one year from the date of the Agreement.


 


NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:


 


1. The seventh paragraph of the Agreement shall be modified to add a new item (iii) as follows: if the closing of an Offering does occur within one year from the date hereof, then three years from the date hereof.  After the modification, the seventh paragraph of the Agreement shall read as follows:


 


This Letter Agreement shall commence as of the date hereof and automatically terminate upon the earliest to occur of (i) three years following the date the Company’s securities are listed on a registered national securities exchange, (ii) if the closing of an Offering does not occur within one year from the date hereof, then two years from the date hereof, or (iii) if the closing of an Offering does occur within one year from the date hereof, then three years from the date hereof (the “Lock-Up Period”)


 


2. This first amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts each of which shall constitute an original but all of which when taken together shall constitute but one contract.


 


3. Except as amended hereby, or as otherwise amended, the Agreement is in all respects ratified and confirmed and the provisions thereof shall remain in full force and effect.


 


(THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)


(SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS)


 




  





1











  






 


                     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this FIRST AMENDMENT TO LOCK-UP AGREEMENT on the date first written above.


 












For and on behalf of:


 


NOVA LIFESTYLE, INC.



	  	  
	  	
 


By_____________________


Name: Tawny Lam


Title: Chairperson and President













	
 


Qiang Liu


 

	  	  	  	  	  
	
By_____________________


Name: Qiang Liu


 

	  	  	  	  	  












  





2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Balance
Sheet at September 30, 1997 (Unaudited) and the Statement of Operations for the
Nine Months Ended September 30, 1997 (Unaudited) and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>     0001051111
<NAME>     Southwest Royalties Holdings, Inc.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                      11,152,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,489,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   123,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            23,558,000
<PP&E>                                     181,756,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (40,306,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             180,825,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       23,192,000
<BONDS>                                    138,805,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       10,921,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       116,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,543,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               180,825,000
<SALES>                                     26,068,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            39,834,000
<CGS>                                       12,166,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               20,676,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             8,093,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          10,950,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,465,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (1,526,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,617,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (490,000)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,107,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.88)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.88)
        

</TABLE>
11,551

5

4,002

15,558

BallotsCounted

247

964

73

1,284

BallotsRejected

MARYLAND

Mail,Fax,Email

Election/Registrar's

Office

Internet

DM

V

Public

Assistance

Office

DisabilitiesAgency

Military

RecruitmentOffice

OtherState

Agency

RegistrationDrives

Registration:Other

251,398

34,863

76,285

11,983

27,497

5,796 298 77 2,647 0

RegistrationFormSource

TotalRegisteredVoters

3,900,090

SectionA-VoterRegistration

RegistrationFormsReceived

1,981,596

ConfirmationNotificationsSent

773,802

Polling

Place

UOCAVA Absentee Provisional

Ballot

EarlyVote

Center

Voteby

Mail

Turnout:

Other

1,674,473

160,508

876,843

16,842

78,660

0 0

SectionF-TurnoutbyMethod

CountedFull Counted

Part

Rejected Provisional:

Other

51,576

17,661

9,423

0

SectionE-ProvisionalBallots

UniformedService

Non-militaryOverseas

Other

SectionB-UOCAVA

7,031

15,458

0

22,489

BallotsTransmitted

TOTAL TOTAL

ProvisionalBallotTotal:78,660 TurnoutTotal:2,807,326

Select: MARYLAND

TOTAL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                          

  

2016EAVSDataBrief 

U i
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8778 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8778

To amend the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 to authorize 
use of amounts under the Troubled Assets Relief Program to be used for 
     activities under the Emergency Solutions Grant Program of the 
  Department of Housing and Urban Development or the Hardest Hit Fund 
   Program of the Department of the Treasury, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 18, 2020

  Mrs. Torres of California introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 to authorize 
use of amounts under the Troubled Assets Relief Program to be used for 
     activities under the Emergency Solutions Grant Program of the 
  Department of Housing and Urban Development or the Hardest Hit Fund 
   Program of the Department of the Treasury, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Keep Your Home and Prevent 
Homelessness Act of 2020''.

SEC. 2. USE OF TARP AMOUNTS.

    (a) In General.--The Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 
is amended by inserting after section 110 (12 U.S.C. 5220) the 
following new section:

``SEC. 110A. OTHER ASSISTANCE.

    ``Notwithstanding section 115(a), section 120, or any other 
provision of law, the Secretary may use any amounts made available 
under this title that are not otherwise obligated to provide assistance 
under the Emergency Solutions Grant Program under subtitle B of title 
IV of the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11371 et 
seq.) or the Hardest Hit Fund Program of the Secretary under this 
title.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of contents in section 1(b) of 
the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (12 U.S.C. 5201 note) 
is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 110 the 
following new item:

``110A. Other assistance.''.
                                 <all>
```
IA

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 140

Condemning and censuring William Jefferson Clinton.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

DECEMBER 17, 1998

Mr. MCHALE introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to

the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Condemning and censuring William Jefferson Clinton.

Whereas in his conduct of the office of the President of the

United States, William Jefferson Clinton, in violation of

his constitutional oath to faithfully execute the office of

President of the United States and in violation of his

constitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, has prevented, obstructed, and impeded

the administration of justice by providing false and misleading testimony under oath;

Whereas William Jefferson Clinton engaged personally and

through his subordinates and agents in a course of conduct or plan designed to delay, impede, and obstruct the

investigation into and the disclosure of information about

the President’s improper and reprehensible relationship

with a subordinate Government employee; and
2

•HJ 140 IH

Whereas by engaging in the foregoing course of conduct, William Jefferson Clinton has acted in a manner contrary to

his trust as President, impairing the due and proper administration of justice in the conduct of lawful inquiries,

to the great prejudice of the cause of law and justice and

to the manifest injury of the people of the United States:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the Congress does hereby censure and condemn Wil4 liam Jefferson Clinton for having engaged in a pattern

5 of deceitful and dishonest conduct that was grossly incon6 sistent with his constitutional obligation and sacred duty

7 to faithfully execute the laws of the United States of

8 America.

Æ
Exhibit 31

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

     I, Harold Blomquist, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Simtek
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

     5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

         (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.



Date: May 13, 2005

                                 /s/Harold Blomquist
                                 --------------------------------------------
                                 Harold Blomquist
                                 Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief
                                 Financial Officer (acting)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-7523

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

NOAH BILLIE, a/k/a Red,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (3:17-cr-00246-JFA-2)

Submitted: February 17, 2022 Decided: February 23, 2022

Before AGEE and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Noah Billie, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 21-7523 Doc: 6 Filed: 02/23/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Noah Billie appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for 

compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), as amended by the First Step 

Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 603(b)(1), 132 Stat. 5194, 5239. We review a district 

court’s denial of a compassionate release motion for abuse of discretion. United States v. 

Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 142 S. Ct. 383 (2021). We have 

reviewed the record in this case and discern no abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we affirm 

the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 21-7523 Doc: 6 Filed: 02/23/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

February 24, 2009 

p0217 

Order 

 

February 24, 2009 

137442(81) 

 

LAUREL A. KENDALL, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 137442 

 COA: 277330 

Eaton CC: 07-000019-AS 

STATE BAR OF MICHIGAN and 

THOMAS M. COOLEY LAW SCHOOL, 

 Defendants-Appellees, 

and 

KAREN S. KIENBAUM & 

ASSOCIATES and WAYNE STATE 

UNIVERSITY LAW SCHOOL, 

 Defendants. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s November 

25, 2008 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order 

was entered erroneously.
Exhibit 4.1







Agreement pursuant to Item 601(b)(4)(iii)(A)


of Regulation S-K







The registrant hereby undertakes and agrees to furnish to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request a copy of any instrument relating to, or defining the rights of the holders, of, any long-term debt of the registrant and/or its subsidiaries, a copy of which has not been filed in reliance upon Item 601(b)(4)(iii)(A) of Regulation S-K or which, although previously filed, shall have become stale in the sense of Item 10(d) of Regulation S-K or which shall have been disposed of by  the Commission pursuant to its Record Control Schedule.  This Agreement and undertaking is intended to be effective with respect to registrant's long-term debt instruments whether securities have been issued thereunder or are yet to be issued thereunder.












	
Date:

	
August 12, 2002

	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 


 

	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
 

	
By:

	
/s/ Theodore C. Miller


	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 

	
Theodore C. Miller, Senior Vice President


	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 

	
Corporate Secretary and Chief Financial Officer
No. 11-10262.

#### Beeson *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### State, *ex rel.*Ona Mary Clifton, *et vir.,*v. City of Daytona Beach, *et al.*

154 So. 165.

Opinion Filed April 2, 1934.

*Ray Selden,*for Plaintiffs in Error;

*Millard B. Conklin,*for Defendants in Error.

Davis, C. J.

— In this case the writ of error should be dismissed for the following reasons: (1) An order quash*385ing an alternative writ of mandamus is interlocutory and not final in character. Such an order consequently does not support a writ of error, which lies only to a proper final judgment in a mandamus case. Such a final judgment would be one of dismissal of the proceeding predicated upon the Court’s order granting the motion to quash the alternative writ. But until the proceeding is finally dismissed and the respondents discharged there is no final judgment, even though the original alternative writ has been quashed on motion.

(2) A mandamus proceedings is one at law, not a proceeding in chancery. An order quashing an alternative writ of mandamus has no place in the chancery order book. It should be recorded in the minutes of the Circuit Court as in law cases. In the present case the order granting a motion to quash an alternative writ of mandamus is made the subject matter appealed from. It affirmatively appears in the transcript that such order was recorded only in the chancery order book and not in the Circuit Court’s minutes as required by law, therefore, it has never been legally entered of record in the court below..

There being nothing to appeal from, the writ of error is dismissed, but without prejudice to further appropriate proceedings in the Circuit Court accompanied by the proper substitution of any officials who may have been elected to succeed the officials originally named as respondents, it appearing that several changes have transpired with respect to the official status of respondents since the original order quashing the alternative writ of mandamus was entered.

Writ of error dismissed without prejudice.

Whitfield, Ellis, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.