alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                  Exhibit 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 *


In connection with the Annual Report of PGI Incorporated (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Laurence A.
Schiffer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:


(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.



/s/ Laurence A. Schiffer
--------------------------------------------------
    Laurence A. Schiffer
    Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)      March 26, 2010


<FN>
*A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company
 and will be retained by the Company and will be furnished to the Securities
 and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
</FN>
# C_2022318EN.01003101.xml

| 22.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 318/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 318/31

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Frankfurt am Main (Germany) lodged on 14 June 2022 — flightright GmbH v Transportes Aéreos Portugueses SA (TAP)

(Case C-388/22)

(2022/C 318/43)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Amtsgericht Frankfurt am Main

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: flightright GmbH

Defendant: Transportes Aéreos Portugueses SA (TAP)

Questions referred

| 1. | Do extraordinary circumstances within the meaning of Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 (1) exist where meteorological conditions occur which are incompatible with the operation of a flight, irrespective of their specific nature? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Do extraordinary circumstances within the meaning of Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 (1) exist where meteorological conditions occur which are incompatible with the operation of a flight, irrespective of their specific nature?

| 2. | If the answer to Question 1 is in the negative, can the extraordinary nature of the meteorological conditions be determined by reference to their regional and seasonal frequency at the place and time at which they occur? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If the answer to Question 1 is in the negative, can the extraordinary nature of the meteorological conditions be determined by reference to their regional and seasonal frequency at the place and time at which they occur?

| 3. | Do extraordinary circumstances within the meaning of Article 5(3) of the Regulation exist where the impact of an air traffic management decision in relation to a particular aircraft on a particular day gives rise to a long delay, an overnight delay or the cancellation of one or more flights by that aircraft, irrespective of the reason for that decision? |
| --- | --- |

3.

Do extraordinary circumstances within the meaning of Article 5(3) of the Regulation exist where the impact of an air traffic management decision in relation to a particular aircraft on a particular day gives rise to a long delay, an overnight delay or the cancellation of one or more flights by that aircraft, irrespective of the reason for that decision?

| 4. | If the answer to Question 3 is in the negative, must the reason for the decision also be extraordinary, such that it need not be expected? |
| --- | --- |

4.

If the answer to Question 3 is in the negative, must the reason for the decision also be extraordinary, such that it need not be expected?

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1).

---
No. 11-218.

#### Tibbals, Warden *v.*Carter.

C. A. 6th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 565 U. S. 1259.] Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as *amicus curiae*and for divided argument granted.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ALL AMERICAN SEMICONDUCTOR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES                                                     Exhibit 11.1

STATEMENT RE:  COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS (UNAUDITED)

                                                                    Quarters                       Nine Months
PERIODS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30                                    2001            2000            2001            2000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE:
<S>                                                  <C>             <C>            <C>              <C>
Net Income (Loss)................................    $    (381,000)  $   4,741,000  $  (13,692,000)  $   8,900,000
                                                     =============   =============  ==============   =============

Weighted Average Shares Outstanding..............        3,856,904       3,844,454       3,856,904       3,820,112
                                                     =============   =============  ==============   =============

Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share..................          $  (.10)         $ 1.23          $(3.55)         $ 2.33
                                                           =======          ======          ======          ======

DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE:

Net Income (Loss)................................    $    (381,000)  $   4,741,000  $  (13,692,000)  $   8,900,000
                                                     =============   =============  ==============   =============

Weighted Average and Dilutive Shares:
  Weighted average shares outstanding............        3,856,904       3,844,454       3,856,904       3,820,112
  Dilutive shares................................               --         450,738              --         320,536
                                                     -------------   -------------  --------------   -------------
                                                         3,856,904       4,295,192       3,856,904       4,140,648
                                                     =============   =============  ==============   =============

Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share................          $  (.10)         $ 1.10          $(3.55)         $ 2.15
                                                           =======          ======          ======          ======
</TABLE>
Total Polling Locations:

Election Day:7 4,433 

Early Voting:8 425 

Mail Ballots Transmitted

6,065,500

10 Mail Ballots Returned11

4,750,645 (78.3% of 

transmitted) 

Mail Ballots Counted12 Mail Ballots Rejected13

4,740,149 (99.8% of 

returned)

13,919 (0.3% of 

returned) 

Mail Voting Policies 

Excuse is required for mail voting14

Does not conduct all-mail elections15

No permanent absentee voting list16

EAVS Jurisdictions

67 

Total Registered Voters as of 

Nov. 3, 20201

15,231,808 

Registration Forms Received2*

9,511,345 

Total Confirmation Notices Sent3*

1,295,491 

2020 EAVS Data Brief: Florida

 Voter Registration

11.7%

12.3%

16.0%

20.8%

39.9%

In-Person

Mail, Email, Fax

Other

Online

Motor Vehicle Dept.

Source of Registration Applications4

 Voter Turnout  Election Technology

In-Person 

Election 

Day Voters 

1,942,102

17.4%

Mail Voters 

4,546,896

40.9%

In-Person 

Early Voters 

4,332,912

38.9%

Other Mode 

308,066

2.8%

Voters Participating By Mode5

64 63

56

4

0 0

Scanner Electronic

Poll

Books

Ballot

Marking

Device

DRE with

VVPAT

DRE w/o

VVPAT

Hand

Count

Technology Used by Jurisdictions9

 Mail Balloting

Notes 

EAVS data and reports may be downloaded at www.eac.gov. 

The data shown are certified as final by state election authorities. 

Responses of “Does not apply,” “Data not available, ” and “Valid 

skip” are shown as zeroes or dashes. Percentages may not sum 

to 100% because of missing data or rounding. 

* Close of registration for 2018 

general election to close of 

registration for 2020 general 

election. 

1 A1a of EAVS. 

2 A3a of EAVS. 

3 A8a of EAVS. 

4 Mail, Email, Fax is A4a. InPerson is A4b. Online is A4c. 

Motor Vehicle Dept. is A4d. 

Other is the sum of A4e–A4l. 

Denominator is A3a. 

5 In-Person Election Day Voters 

is F1b. Mail Voters is F1d+F1g. 

In-Person Early Voters is F1f. 

Other Mode is F1c+F1e+F1h. 

Denominator is sum of F1b–

F1h. 

6 F1a of EAVS. Denominator 

is citizen voting age 

population (CVAP). 

7 D3a of EAVS. 

8 D4a of EAVS. 

9 F3a–d, F5a, F6a, F7a, F8a, 

and F11a of EAVS. 

10 C1a of EAVS. 

11 C1b of EAVS. 

12 C3a of EAVS. 

13 C4a of EAVS. 

14Q17 of Policy Survey. 

15 Q18 and Q18a of Policy 

Survey. 

16 Q19 of Policy Survey. 

Turnout 

71.8%

6
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE 

STATE OF OREGON

STATE OF OREGON, ) Marion County Circuit Court

) Case no. 94C20467

Plaintiff-Appellant, )

Respondent on Review, )

)

v. ) SC S46714

) CA A95499

HECTOR VASQUEZ-HERNANDEZ, )

)

Defendant-Respondent, ) ORDER AFFIRMING BY AN

Petitioner on Review. ) EQUALLY DIVIDED COURT

Upon consideration by the court.

The decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed by an equally divided court.

Dated this 23rd day of June 2003.

 

WALLACE P. CARSON, JR.

CHIEF JUSTICE

Van Hoomissen, J., retired December 31, 2000, and did not participate in the decision of

this case; Kulongoski, J., resigned June 14, 2001, and did not participate in the decision of

this case; Leeson, J., resigned January 31, 2003, and did not participate in the decision of

this case; De Muniz and Balmer, JJ., did not participate in the consideration or decision of

this case.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 21                      PGI INCORPORATED                    PAGE 1 OF 1
----------                      ----------------                    -----------
                                  SUBSIDIARIES
                                  ------------

                                        State of          Relationship
                                        --------          ------------
                                        Incorporation
                                        -------------

Sugarmill Woods, Inc.                   Florida           Wholly owned (1)
Sugarmill Woods Management, Inc.        Florida           Wholly owned (1)
Deep Creek Utilities, Inc.              Florida           Wholly owned (1)
Southern Woods, Incorporated            Florida           Wholly owned by
                                                        Sugarmill Woods, Inc.
Burnt Store Marina, Inc.                Florida           Wholly owned (1)
Punta Gorda Isles Sales, Inc.           Florida           Wholly owned (1)
Burnt Store Utilities, Inc.             Florida           Wholly owned (1)
Gulf Coast Credit Corporation           Florida           Wholly owned (1)
Sugarmill Construction, Inc.            Florida           Wholly owned by
                                                        Sugarmill Woods, Inc.

<FN>
---------
(1) Included in the Company's consolidated financial statements.
No. 11-10534.

#### Colvin *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-10270.

#### Ruppert *v.*Aragon.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
##### 



EXHIBIT 12.2
  ARCHSTONE-SMITH
    OPERATING TRUST
    COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES
    AND PREFERRED SHARE DISTRIBUTIONS
    (Dollar amounts in thousands)
  Years Ended
    December 31,2005(1)


2004(1)


2003(1)


2002(1)


2001(1)Earnings from operations

$
134,378


$
116,701


$
114,244


$
117,336


$
95,723Add:Interest Expense


187,982



144,500



121,671



123,506



56,332Earnings as adjusted

$
322,360


$
261,201


$
235,915


$
240,842


$
152,055Combined fixed charges and
    Preferred Unit distributions:Interest expense

$
187,982


$
144,500


$
121,671


$
123,506


$
56,332Capitalized interest


39,111



23,572



26,854



32,377



29,186Total fixed charges


227,093



168,072



148,525



155,883



85,518Preferred Unit distributions


4,572



16,254



26,153



34,309



25,877Combined fixed charges and
    Preferred Unit distributions

$
231,665


$
184,326


$
174,678


$
190,192


$
111,395Ratio of earnings to combined
    fixed charges and Preferred Unit distributions


1.4



1.4



1.4



1.3



1.4     (1)
    
    Net earnings from discontinued operations have been reclassified
    for all periods presented.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                     EXHIBIT 5.1

                   [VINSON & ELKINS LETTERHEAD APPEARS HERE]



                                  May 23, 1997



Southwest Bancorporation of Texas, Inc.
4400 Post Oak Parkway
Houston, Texas 77027

Gentlemen:

     We have acted as counsel for Southwest Bancorporation of Texas, Inc. (the
"Company") and have participated in all proceedings in connection with the
registration by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission
("Commission") on a Form S-4 Registration Statement under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended, of an aggregate of 1,859,375 shares of Company Common Stock,
par value $1.00 ("Common Stock"), which may be issued to the shareholders of
Pinemont Bank (the "Bank") in exchange for their shares of Common Stock of the
Bank, $.66 2/3 par value ("Bank Common Stock"), at an exchange ratio of 0.625 of
a share of Company Common Stock for each share of Bank Common Stock, in
connection with the proposed merger of the Bank with and into Southwest Bank of
Texas National Association, a wholly-owned subsidiary bank of the Company ("SW
Bank").

     Before rendering the opinion set forth below, we have examined, among other
things, the Articles of Incorporation, as amended, and bylaws of the Company,
the corporate proceedings of the Company with respect to the proposed merger
with the Bank, the Agreement and Plan of Merger ("Agreement") entered into
between the Company, SW Bank and the Bank, and the Registration Statement on
Form S-4 ("Registration Statement") filed by the Company with the Commission in
connection with the above described proposed merger.  In addition, we have
relied as to factual matters on certificates of certain public officials and
officers of the Company.  We are rendering this opinion as of the date on which
the Registration Statement becomes effective.

     Based on the foregoing, we are of the opinion that the 1,859,375 shares of
Company Common Stock, which are proposed to be exchanged by the Company for
shares of capital stock of the Bank pursuant to the Agreement at the exchange
ratio of 0.625 of a share of Company Common Stock for each share of Bank Common
Stock have been validly authorized for issuance, and, subject to compliance with
any applicable Blue Sky laws, upon the issuance and delivery of such 1,859,375
shares in accordance with the provisions of the Agreement, as set forth in the
Registration Statement, such shares of Company Common Stock will be validly
issued, fully paid and nonassessable.
<PAGE>
 
Southwest Bancorporation of Texas, Inc.
Page 2
May 23, 1997



     We hereby consent to the use of our name in the Registration Statement and
to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the Registration Statement.  In
giving this consent, however, we do not admit that we are within the category of
persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933
and the rules and regulations of the Commission thereunder.

                               Very truly yours,



                               VINSON & ELKINS L.L.P.
f10k2013ex10xxv_maxsound.htm


Exhibit  10.25


 




ADDENDUM TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT









THIS ADDENDUM TO THE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of this day December 31, 2012, by and between Max Sound Corporation, a Delaware corporation with offices at 2902 A Colorado Blvd, Santa Monica, CA 90404 (the “Corporation”), and Greg Halpern, an individual at 8837 Villa La Jolla Drive, #12109, La Jolla, CA 92039 (the “Executive”), under the following circumstances:



 


RECITALS:










	
a.  

	
The Corporation has secured the services for ten years of the Executive on October 13, 2008 upon the terms and conditions as previously set forth on that day and by original agreement filed in the Company’s 8k filing; and













	
b.  

	
The Executive is continuing to render services to the Corporation upon the terms and conditions as previously set forth on October 13, 2008.












NOW, THEREFORE, the parties mutually agree to the following changes to the original emloyment agreement as follows:







The Corporation previously agreed to pay the Executive as compensation for his services hereunder, set forth in Section 4 in the original agreement.







Compensation of Executive.


 


Greg Halpern - CFO agreed to eliminate his previous annual bonus entitlement, which was previously 10% of revenues. In exchange for this consideration, the Company agreed that Halpern will be decreased as his new bonus to 7% of net profits and Halpern may receive such bonus in cash or Rule 144 stock or any combination of both.







Wheretofore, the Parties mutually and completely agreeing to the changes and additions listed herein this Addendum in their entirety and that all other provisions of the original October 13, 2008 agreement remain in full force and effect set forth their hand and seal on this day December 31, 2012.


 




	MAX SOUND CORPORATION 	 	 	EXECUTIVE	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	
/s/ John Blaisure

	 	 	
/s/  Greg Halpern

	 
	
John Blaisure - CEO   

	 	 	
Greg Halpern
EX-10.53





 Exhibit 10.53 

Amendment No. 2 to Scientific Advisory Board Agreement 

This Amendment No. 2, effective May 31, 2016 (“Amendment Effective Date”), is made to the Scientific Advisory Board
Agreement, dated June 18, 2012, as amended by Amendment No. 1 to Scientific Advisory Board Agreement, dated April 12, 2014 (collectively, the “SAB Agreement”), and is by and between Caribou Biosciences, Inc. (the
“Company”), a Delaware corporation having its address at 2929 7th Street, Suite 105, Berkeley, CA 94710, and Jennifer A. Doudna (“Advisor”), an individual. Each may be referred
to as a “party” and collectively as the “parties.” Any capitalized term used herein that is not defined shall have the meaning ascribed to it in the SAB Agreement. 

WHEREAS, the SAB Agreement will expire on June 18, 2016, and the parties wish to extend the Term of the Agreement for an additional two
(2) years; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and undertakings hereinafter set forth, the parties agree as
follows: 
  

	 	1.	 Section 3(a) of the Agreement is hereby amended to replace “fourth” with “sixth” and
the Term shall now expire on June 18, 2018. 


  

	 	2.	 Except as set forth in Paragraph 1 above, the terms and conditions of the SAB Agreement remain in full force
and effect and the parties hereby ratify and confirm the SAB Agreement in all respects. 


 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties
have executed this Amendment No. 2 to Scientific Advisory Board Agreement as of the Amendment Effective Date. 
  

					
	Caribou Biosciences, Inc.	 		 	Jennifer A. Doudna
			
	 /s/ Rachel E. Haurwitz
	 		 	 /s/ Jennifer A. Doudna

	Rachel E. Haurwitz	 		 	
	President & CEO
<PAGE>
 
                                   EXHIBIT 21
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                         JURISDICTION
                                                              OF
NAME OF COMPANY                                          ORGANIZATION
---------------                                         --------------
<S>                                                     <C>
A-1 Appliance & Air Conditioning, Inc.                  Texas
A-ABC Appliance, Inc.                                   Texas
AA JARL, Inc. (dba "Jarrell Plumbing")                  Texas
Airtron, Inc.                                           Delaware
Airtron of Central Florida, Inc.                        Florida
All Service Electric, Inc.                              Florida
Arkansas Mechanical Services, Inc.                      Arkansas
Callahan Roach Products & Publications, Inc.            Colorado
Central Carolina Air Conditioning Company               North Carolina
Charlie Crawford, Inc. (dba "Charlie's Plumbing")       Texas
Costner Brothers, Inc.                                  South Carolina
Evans Services, Inc.                                    Alabama
GroupMAC Holding Corp.                                  Delaware
GroupMAC Management Co.                                 Delaware
Hallmark Air Conditioning, Inc.                         Texas
K&N Plumbing, Heating, and Air Conditioning, Inc.       Texas
Linford Service Company                                 California
MacDonald-Miller Co., Inc.                              Washington
MacDonald-Miller Industries, Inc.                       Washington
MacDonald-Miller Service, Inc.                          Washington
Masters, Inc.                                           Maryland
Paul E. Smith Co., Inc.                                 Indiana
Sibley Services, Incorporated                           Tennessee
Southeast Mechanical Service, Inc.                      Florida
Suburban Acquisition Corp.                              Maryland
United Acquisition Corp.                                Iowa
Van's Comfortemp Air Conditioning, Inc.                 Florida
Willis Refrigeration, Air Conditioning & Heating, Inc.  Ohio
Yale Incorporated                                       Minnesota
</TABLE>
# C_2023223EN.01002302.xml

| 26.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 223/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 223/23

---

Judgment of the General Court of 3 May 2023 — Chambre de commerce et d’industrie territoriale de la Marne en Champagne v EUIPO — Ambrosetti Group (TEHA)

(Case T-60/22) (1)

(European Union trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Word mark TEHA - Earlier national figurative mark tema - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Lack of genuine use of the mark - Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001) - Use in a form which differs in elements which alter the distinctive character of the trade mark - Article 15(1), second subparagraph, point (a), of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 18(1), second subparagraph, point (a), of Regulation 2017/1001)))

(2023/C 223/32)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Chambre de commerce et d’industrie territoriale de la Marne en Champagne (Châlons-en-Champagne, France) (represented by: T. de Haan, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Frydendahl, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Ambrosetti Group Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: G. Guglielmetti, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 23 November 2021 (Case R 839/2021-4).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the chambre de commerce et d’industrie territoriale de la Marne en Champagne to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the chambre de commerce et d’industrie territoriale de la Marne en Champagne to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 128, 21.3.2022.

---