alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  The undersigned officers each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Caspian International Oil Corporation on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September  30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  November  12, 2007 /s/ Nurlan Janseitov Nurlan Janseitov Chief Executive Officer  November  12, 2007 /s/ David Fulton David Fulton Chief Financial Officer   This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|    |                                                                                                                                                 |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. for the fiscal year end December 31, 2018; and |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|                |
|----------------|
|                |  |
| April 30, 2019 | /s/ Louis Salamone |
|           | Louis Salamone |
|           | Chief Financial Officer |
# United Stat es Court of A ppeals For the First C ircuit

No. 03-1972 ROY HILLSTROM, Plaintiff, Appellant,

v. BEST WESTERN TLC HOTEL, Defendant, Appellee.

ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this Court issued on December 31, 2003 is amended as follows: On page 2, line 3, "April 2002" should be replaced with "April 2000" On page 8, after the colon on line 2, the portion of the sentence reading "usually the availability of a mixed-motive analysis depends" should be revised to read "the rule that usually the availability of a mixed-motive analysis depended"
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Enrique Lopez LARA, also known as Juan Francisco Martinez Reyes, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-11756 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed March 9, 2018

*433James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S, Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Brandon Elliott Beck, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Lubbock, TX, for Defendant-Appellant

Before DAVIS, CLEMENT and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Enrique Lopez Lara appeals his conditional guilty plea to one count of making a false claim to United States citizenship in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 911. His plea agreement reserved his right to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion to suppress evidence regarding his true identity as a citizen of Mexico.

Lopez Lara argues on appeal that the district court erred by denying his motion to suppress. He contends that federal agents detained him at an airport without reasonable suspicion, in violation of the Fourth Amendment, and that the evidence obtained as a result should have been suppressed. He concedes, however, as he did in the district court, that his argument is foreclosed by *United States v. Roque-Villanueva,*175 F.3d 345, 346 (5th Cir. 1999), and he raises the issue to preserve it for further review.

The Government has moved for summary affirmance or, alternatively, for an extension of time to file a brief on the merits. This court has held that even if there was a Fourth Amendment violation, evidence of an alien’s identity is not suppressible. *See United States v. Hernandez-Mandujano,*721 F.3d 345, 351 (5th Cir. 2013); *Roque-Villanueva,*175 F.3d at 346. Thus, Lopez Lara’s argument is in fact foreclosed. *See Roque-Villanueva,*175 F.3d at 346.

Accordingly, summary affirmance is appropriate. *See Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis,*406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969). The Government’s motion for summary af-firmance is GRANTED, and its alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief on the merits is DENIED. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
No. 11-7106.

#### Curtis-Joseph *v.*Richardson et al.,

565 U. S. 1123. Motion for leave to file petition for rehearing denied.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 45 (Friday, March 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10549-10550]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5655]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket Nos. EC97-11-000 and ER97-1346-000]


American Ref-Fuel Company of Delaware County, L.P. and Delaware 
Resources Management, Inc., Notice of Filing

March 3, 1997.
    Take notice that on February 27, 1997, American Ref-Fuel Company of 
Delaware County, L.P. (ARC) and Delaware Resource Management, Inc. 
(DRMI) (collectively ``Applicants'') submitted for filing with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (``Commission'') pursuant to 18 
CFR Part 33, a letter notifying the Commission of a change in fact 
related to the joint petition Applicants filed with the Commission for 
an order under Section 203 of the Federal Power Act approving the 
transfer of jurisdictional assets (``Joint Petition'').
    The Joint Petition stated that ARC is owned equally by Air Products 
and Chemicals, Inc. (``Air Products'') and Browning-Ferris Industries, 
Inc. (``BFI''). The Joint Petition also stated that Air Products has 
announced that it is seeking purchasers for its share of ARC and 
certain affiliates of ARC. The letter notified the Commission that in 
the event that Air Products declines to continue as a 50% owner of ARC, 
BFI would assume 100% of the ownership of ARC (through subsidiaries). 
The letter stated that ARC would either be owed (1) wholly by BFI or 
(2) 50% by Air Products and 50% by BFI.
    Applicants requested that the Commission issue an order approving 
the transfer as soon as possible but not later than March 11, 1997.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before March 10, 1997. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make

[[Page 10550]]

protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a 
party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on 
file with the Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-5655 Filed 3-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# . ~~18~el



# r,. 4tY,,---/~- i 

# Ilie"~ Mississippi I ')
. . Johnny Magee Mayor June 16,2014 Dennis J. DeVany, Chief Essential Air Service Division, X-53 Office of Aviation Analysis Department of Transportation 8th Floor, Room W86-472 1200New Jersey Avenue, S.B. Washington, DC 20590 RE: EAS Order 2014-4-24 Dear Mr. DeVany: The City of Laurel is in receipt ofthe proposals from AeroDynamics, Inc., Express Jet Airlines an~ Sun Air International, to provide essential air service to the citizens ofthil Hattiesburg regIon. . After careful and considerate review, the City of Laurel selects the Express Jdtproposal to provide air service to our community
. We believe this proposal, with 50-passenger jet service to DallaslFt. Worth, affords our travelers with better service and more travel connections. It is this type of service that will allow our community to grow and prosper. This letter represents the views ofthe community as a whole, and no other entities representing the community will be submitting comments. We thank you for your efforts in assisting our corrununity to secure air service. Sincerely,



### JM:cbt

. I cc: Michael Fl
. Martin at michael.f.martin@dot.gov I I P. O. Box 647 / Laurel, MS 39441/ Phone (601) 428-6401 / Fax (601) 428.6403
# C_2021502EN.01003701.xml

| 13.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 502/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 502/37

---

Action brought on 11 October 2021 — H/2 Credit Manager v EUIPO — Hcapital Partners SCR (H/2 CAPITAL PARTNERS)

(Case T-656/21)

(2021/C 502/55)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: H/2 Credit Manager LP (Stamford, Connecticut, United States) (represented by: S. Malynicz, Barrister-at-Law, and J. Bittner, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Hcapital Partners SCR, SA (Lisbon, Portugal)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark H/2 CAPITAL PARTNERS — Application for registration No 17 599 374

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 July 2021 in Case R 1954/2019-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO and the other party (if it takes part in these proceedings) to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and the other party (if it takes part in these proceedings) to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

| — | The Board of Appeal wrongly held that the relevant public included the general public; |
| --- | --- |

—

The Board of Appeal wrongly held that the relevant public included the general public;

| — | The Board of Appeal failed to consider the two marks as respective wholes, taking account of their dominant and distinctive elements. |
| --- | --- |

—

The Board of Appeal failed to consider the two marks as respective wholes, taking account of their dominant and distinctive elements.

---
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 13(a) OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Terence Griffin, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Applied Imaging Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The
registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: May 15, 2006



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ TERENCE GRIFFIN    
|Terence Griffin        
|Chief Financial Officer
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### June 26, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 133074 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 133074 COA: 275144 Wayne CC: 96-001110-01 CARL STRINGER, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the January 5, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s motion for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).

p0618 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 26, 2007

Clerk
No. 11-1548.

#### Tran *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
#### Julio Cesar GUTIERREZ-JARAMILLO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION GILMER, WARDEN, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 17-7271

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 13, 2018

Decided: March 15, 2018

Julio Cesar Gutierrez-Jaramillo, Appellant Pro Se. Helen Campbell Altmeyer, Erin Carter Tison, Assistant United States Attorneys, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and . WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Julio Cesar Gutierrez-Jaramillo, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we . affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Gutierrez-Jaramillo v. Fed. Corr. Inst. Gilmer,*No. 5:16-cv-00172-FPS-JES, 2017 WL 3476973 (N.D.W. Va., Aug. 14, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
Note: This disposition is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2007-1203

VITA ZAHNFABRIK H. RA UTER GMBH & CO. KG,

VIDENT, and NEIL R. HALL,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

DENTSPLY INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

David A. Dillard , Christie, Parker & Hale, LLP, of Pasadena, California, argued

for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief was Brian K. Brookey

.

Brett M. Schuman , Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, of San Francisco, California,

argued for defendant-appellee. Wi th him on the brief was Thomas D. Kohler

.

Appealed from: United States District Cour t for the Central Dis trict of California

Judge James V. SelnaNOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2007-1203

VITA ZAHNFABRIK H. RA UTER GMBH & CO. KG,

VIDENT, and NEIL R. HALL,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

DENTSPLY INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.



## Judgment

ON APPEAL from the United States Distr ict Court for the Central District of

California

in CASE NO(S). 04-CV-0729

This CAUSE having been hear d and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Per Curiam (NEWMAN, MAYER and SCHALL, Circuit Judges )

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED May 16, 2008 /s/ Jan Horbaly

______ Jan Horbaly, Clerk
PAGE <1>

                                  Exhibit 32.1

                               Pyramid Oil Company

                  Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                        As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
                         Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Pyramid Oil Company (the Company) on
form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, J. Ben Hathaway, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



     Dated: March 30, 2004

                                        J. BEN HATHAWAY
                                               ---------------
                                               J. Ben Hathaway
                                           Chief Executive Officer





















PAGE <1>

                                   Exhibit 32.2

                                Pyramid Oil Company

                  Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                        As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
                         Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Pyramid Oil Company (the Company) on
form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Lee G.  Christianson,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.




     Date: March 30, 2004

                                                LEE G. CHRISTIANSON
                                                -------------------
                                                Lee G. Christianson
                                              Chief Financial Officer
TRU.2013.10K-Ex10.31




Exhibit 10.31


                                                    [To be printed on Toys “R” Us Letterhead]


DATE:
TO:
FROM:   Edward T. Redling, Vice President Total Rewards
SUBJECT:  Amendment to Initial MEP Options




You currently hold outstanding options to purchase _________ shares of common stock of
Toys “R” Us, Inc. that were granted to you on July 21, 2005 pursuant to the Toys “R” Us, Inc. 2005 Amended and Restated Management Equity Plan.  These options, which were scheduled to expire on July 21, 2015 (the “Initials MEP Options”), are currently “underwater” (i.e., the grant price of $______ exceeds the current $________Fair Market Value of the Company’s stock).


In recognition of your long service and dedication to the Company as well as your expected future contributions to our success, the Board of Directors has approved an amendment to your Initial MEP Options to extend the expiration date to August 6, 2017.  Because this amendment is favorable to you, it does not require your consent and became effective automatically as of November 14, 2013.  Your Initial MEP Options remain fully vested, and the other terms of your Initial MEP Option remain unchanged.


If you have any questions about this change, please contact Jennifer Sansone at 
973-617-_________.