alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Rose GLORIOSO-BRANDT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Eric HARGAN, Acting Secretary, Dept. of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 17-1863

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 16, 2017

Decided: January 8, 2018

Rose Glorioso-Brandt, Appellant Pro Se. Evelyn Lombardo Cusson, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Rose Glorioso-Brandt appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the employer in Glorioso-Brandt’s employment discrimination action. “[W]e review de novo the district court’s order granting summary judg*793ment.” *Jacobs v. N.C. Admin. Office of the Courts,*780 F.3d 562, 565 n.1 (4th Cir. 2015). “A district court ‘shall grant summary judgment if the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.’ ” *Id.*at 568 (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a)). “A dispute is genuine if a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party.” *Id.*(internal quotation marks omitted). In determining whether a genuine issue of material fact exists, “we view the facts and all justifiable inferences arising therefrom in the light most favorable to ... the non-moving party.” *Id.*at 565 n.1 (internal quotation marks omitted). However, “the nonmoving party must rely on more than eonclusory allegations, mere speculation, the building of one inference upon another, or the mere existence of a scintilla of evidence.” *Dash v. Mayweather,*731 F.3d 303, 311 (4th Cir. 2013).

We have reviewed the arguments pressed on appeal in conjunction with the record, which includes the transcript of a five-day administrative hearing. On this record, we find no reversible error in the district court’s rejection of Glorioso-Brandt’s employment discrimination claims. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. *See Glorioso-Brandt v. Price,*No. 1:16-cv-04025-JFM (D. Md. July 13, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
# C_2022441EN.01000402.xml

| 21.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 441/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 441/4

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Frankfurt am Main (Germany) lodged on 29 July 2022 — AQ v trendtours Touristik GmbH

(Case C-511/22)

(2022/C 441/08)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landgericht Frankfurt am Main

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: AQ

Defendant: trendtours Touristik GmbH

Questions referred

| 1. | Must the first sentence of Article 12(2) of Directive (EU) 2015/2302 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2015 on package travel and linked travel arrangements, amending Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 and Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 90/314/EEC (‘the Package Travel Directive’) be interpreted as providing for a further right of termination — in addition to that provided for in Article 12(1) of that directive — the legal consequences of which apply only if the traveller invokes that right in his or her declaration of termination? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Must the first sentence of Article 12(2) of Directive (EU) 2015/2302 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2015 on package travel and linked travel arrangements, amending Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 and Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 90/314/EEC (‘the Package Travel Directive’) be interpreted as providing for a further right of termination — in addition to that provided for in Article 12(1) of that directive — the legal consequences of which apply only if the traveller invokes that right in his or her declaration of termination?

| 2. | Must Article 12(2) of the Package Travel Directive be interpreted as meaning that an obligation to pay a termination fee does not cease to apply where the traveller does not state a reason in his or her declaration of termination of the package travel contract or states a reason which is not related to an unavoidable and extraordinary circumstance? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Must Article 12(2) of the Package Travel Directive be interpreted as meaning that an obligation to pay a termination fee does not cease to apply where the traveller does not state a reason in his or her declaration of termination of the package travel contract or states a reason which is not related to an unavoidable and extraordinary circumstance?

---

(1)  OJ 2015 L 326, p. 1.

---
NaturalNano,
Inc.


15 Schoen
Place


Pittsford,
NY 14534


 


                                                  November
27, 2013


 


Alpha Capital


C/o LH Financial 150 Central


Park South 

2nd Floor


New York, NY 10019


 


Ladies and Gentlemen:


 


This
letter shall serve as the agreement and promise of Natural Nano, Inc. (the "Company") to pay to the order of Alpha
Capital. ("Alpha"), the sum of $1500.00 plus interest at 8% per annum. The Company acknowledges that Alpha has
advanced $1500.00 in funds at the Company's request, and the Company's obligations hereunder shall be secured by all other
collateral that secures the various senior secured promissory notes that the Company has previously issued to Longview. In
the event the Company fails to repay Alpha in accordance with the terms of this letter, Alpha should be entitled to exercise
all rights granted to it as a secured creditor pursuant to the Security Agreements (as defined in the 8% Senior Secured
Promissory Note issued to Longview by the Company on or about November 5. 2008).


 


All payments
under or pursuant to this Note shall be made in United States Dollars, in immediately available funds, to Longview at the address
set forth above or at such other place as Longview may designate from time to time in writing to the Company or by wire transfer
of funds to Longview's account, as requested by Longview. The outstanding principal balance of this Note, together with all accrued
and unpaid interest, shall be due and payable in full on February 28, 2014.


 


	 	
         Very truly yours,

	 	 
	 	Natural Nano, Inc.
	 	 
	 	/s/ James Wemett
	 	Name: James Wemett
	 	Title: CEO
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8547 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8547

  To make permanent the tax deduction for energy efficient commercial 
                               buildings.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 6, 2020

 Mr. Williams introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To make permanent the tax deduction for energy efficient commercial 
                               buildings.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Incentivize Energy-Saving 
Improvements Act''.

SEC. 2. TAX DEDUCTION FOR ENERGY EFFICIENT COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS MADE 
              PERMANENT.

    (a) In General.--Section 179D of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
is amended by striking subsection (h).
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2020.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



Exhibit 10.208
 
 AMENDMENT TO SERVICE AGREEMENT  DATED MARCH 1, 2006
 th
      1)
    
    The cash component of the fee will be a monthly retainer in the amount
of:
 
    
    Month 5-14: $14,500 / month
  2)
    
    Common Stock & Warrants:
 
    
    5,000,000 shares of common stock restricted for one year.
    
    6,000,000 additional shares with a restricted legend limiting sale to a
minimum price of $0.05, vesting at a rate of 400,000/month with vesting beginning
as of March 1, 2006
 * All shares will carry with them piggyback registration rights and are to be
delivered as soon as practicable following the execution of this Agreement.
 3)
    
    If we are called upon to assist in any capital raising efforts, the
quantum and structure of compensation is as follows:
 a.
    
    Senior or Mezzanine Bank/Commercial Lender Debt
    
    1 1/2 % for Debt if placed through an intermediary also receiving a fee, and the
fees paid to us must be acceptable to the intermediary;
    
    3% for Debt if placed directly.b.
    
    Equity, convertible debt (typical bridge Loan or other private
placement structured as debt, not supported by assets and intended, in part or in
whole, to be converted to equity), or other equity-linked securities.
    
    3% of cash proceeds and 5% of the warrants included in the placement, if
placed through an intermediary also receiving a fee, and the fees paid to us must
be acceptable to the intermediary;
    
    10% of cash proceeds and 10% of the warrants included in the placement, if
placed directly.
   ROI Group Associates, Inc.
    
    The Immune Response Corporation(signed by)
    
    (signed by)Robert J. Giordano
    
    Joseph ONeillPresident
    
    President and Chief Executive Officer
# Budgets

- Fiscal Year 2024 Budget Resources “The investments proposed in President Biden’s new budget reflect this Administration’s deep belief in education as the foundation of all opportunity in America.
- FACT SHEET: House Republican Proposals Hurt Children, Students, and Borrowers, and Undermine Education Congressional Republicans are holding the nation's full faith and credit hostage in an effort to impose devastating cutbacks that would hurt children and undermine education, raise costs for hardworking families, and set back economic growth.
- Statement by U.S. Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona on the President's Fiscal Year 2024 Budget The Biden-Harris Administration today released the President's Budget for Fiscal Year 2024.
- Statement by Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona on the President’s Fiscal Year 2023 Budget The Biden-Harris Administration today submitted to Congress the President's Budget for fiscal year 2023.
- Statement by Miguel Cardona Secretary of Education on the U.S. Department of Education Fiscal Year 2022 Budget Request Good morning Chairwoman Murray and Ranking Member Blunt.
- Statement by Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona on the President's Fiscal Year 2022 Budget The Biden-Harris Administration today submitted to Congress the President's budget for fiscal year 2022.
- Oral Statement by Miguel Cardona Secretary of Education on the U.S. Department of Education Fiscal Year 2022 Budget Request Good  morning Chairwoman DeLauro, Ranking Member Cole, and distinguished members of  the Subcommittee.
DDO Fiscal Year 2020 Mission Executive Summaries

Laos 20-1LA

Joint Field Activity (JFA) 20-1LA deployed 66 personnel in three recovery teams from 18 

October to 04 December 2019 to the Central and Southern Provinces of Laos. Also during this 

JFA, the Deputy Director of Operations (DDO), Expeditionary Support (ES) leadership, and 

DPAA's Senior Enlisted Leader visited Detachment 3 in Vientiane and conducted site visits 

before departing to Vietnam.

Photo: Mr. Shawn Joy, team anthropologist, reviews a scientific site report while conducting an 

excavation during mission 20-1LA in the Lao Peoples' Democratic Republic.
Vietnam 20-1VN

Joint Field Activity (JFA) 20-1VN deployed 68 personnel in three recovery teams from 18 

October to 04 December 2019 to the Northern and Central Provinces of Vietnam. DPAA also 

deployed two organic investigation teams; one research-investigation team that focused efforts at 

the People's Army of Vietnam (PAVN) Library and one investigation team that focused

investigations and surveys of 13 separate cases. Also during this JFA, the Deputy Director of 

Operations (DDO), Expeditionary Support (ES) leadership, and DPAA's Senior Enlisted Leader 

visited Detachment 2 in Hanoi and conducted site visits before returning to Hawaii.

Photo: Rear Admiral Darius Banaji, DPAA's Deputy Director for Operations, assists a recovery 

team during its excavation of a site in Vietnam during mission 20-1VN.
Photo: U.S. Marine Corps Sgt. Lucas Robinson, a Defense POW/MIA Accounting Agency 

(DPAA) recovery team explosive ordinance disposal technician (EOD), sweeps a unit for loose 

metal during a recovery mission in Lang Son Province, Vietnam, Nov. 5, 2019.
India 20-1IN

From 4 November to 4 December, a ten-member team from Southeastern Archeological 

Research, Inc. (SEARCH) conducted recovery operations at a World War II crash site in India. 

SEARCH is partnering with DPAA to conduct operations in India. DPAA's valued partners 

provide the agency the ability to increase the number of operations conducted each year in 

support of the personnel accounting mission.

Photo: Members of a SEARCH team conduct recovery operations in India.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 44 (Thursday, March 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 10260]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5505]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Patents Available for Licensing

AGENCY: Office of the Judge Advocate General, Army.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with 37 CFR 404 et seq., announcement is made of 
the availability of U.S. Patent No. 5,417,986, entitled ``Vaccines 
Against Diseases Caused by Enteropathogenic Organisms using Antigens 
Encapsulated Within Biodegradable-Biocompatible Microspheres'' issued 
May 28, 1995 and U.S. Patent No. 5,470,311 entitled ``Microsphere Drug 
Application Device'' issued November 28, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Paul Mele, ORTA, Walter Reed Army 
Institute of Research, Washington DC 20307-5100.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: None.
Gregory D. Showalter,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-5505 Filed 3-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10** 
**- 7195** 

DAVID HOWELL ,
Plaintiff

– Appellant ,

v.

OFFICER C. L. BO OYER; CUMBERLAND COUNTY SHERIFF’ S DEPARTMENT ,
Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. ( 5:09

- ct

- 03043

- FL )

Submitted : March 17, 2011 Decided: April 1, 2011

Before MOTZ and WYNN , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circu it Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

David Howell, Appellant Pro Se. Ronnie Monroe Mitchell, MITCHELL, BREWER, RICHARDSON, ADAMS, BURGE & BOUGHMAN, Fayetteville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding pr ecedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

David Howell appeals the district court ’ s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (200 6 ) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Howell v. Booyer , No. 5 :09

- ct

- 03043

- FL (E.D.N.C.

Aug. 1 6, 2010) . We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S
INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN IT ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           9,382
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,434
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         387,619
<DEPRECIATION>                                  76,671
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 360,363
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        255,862
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             8
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,673
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   360,363
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                25,659
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,736
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,616
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (4,769)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (1,856)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2,913)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2,913)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (3.64)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (3.64)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated condensed financial statements of American Restaurant Partners,
L.P. at September 29, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to 
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-29-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-29-1998
<CASH>                                          983996
<SECURITIES>                                     77635
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1055271
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     376038
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2345690
<PP&E>                                        35818671
<DEPRECIATION>                                14796250
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                32294559
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         12976883
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (3697787)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  32294559
<SALES>                                       29946394
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              29946394
<CGS>                                          7756865
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 27728779
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1870469
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1227950
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1227950
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1227950
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .31
        

</TABLE>
# C_2021329EN.01003901.xml

| 16.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 329/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 329/39

---

Action brought on 29 June 2021 — Sushi&Food Factor v EUIPO (READY 4YOU)

(Case T-367/21)

(2021/C 329/52)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Applicant: Sushi&Food Factor sp. z o.o. (Robakowo, Poland) (represented by: J. Gwiazdowska, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: Application for EU figurative mark READY 4YOU — Application No 18 210 977

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 April 2021 in Case R 2273/2020-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision in its entirety and give final judgment by approving for registration EU trade mark application No 18 210 977; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision in its entirety and give final judgment by approving for registration EU trade mark application No 18 210 977;

| — | in the alternative, annul the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 April 2021 in Case R 2273/2020-5 and remit the case to EUIPO for further consideration; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, annul the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 April 2021 in Case R 2273/2020-5 and remit the case to EUIPO for further consideration;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs, including the costs incurred by the applicant in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO and the Operations Department of EUIPO. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs, including the costs incurred by the applicant in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO and the Operations Department of EUIPO.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council, read in conjunction with Article 7(2) thereof; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council, read in conjunction with Article 7(2) thereof;

| — | Infringement of Article 94(1) and Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 94(1) and Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 20 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, as well as Article 41(1) and (2)(a) and (c) thereof, including the right to be heard, the obligation to give reasons for decisions, the right to good administration, the principle of legal certainty, and the principle of equal treatment. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 20 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, as well as Article 41(1) and (2)(a) and (c) thereof, including the right to be heard, the obligation to give reasons for decisions, the right to good administration, the principle of legal certainty, and the principle of equal treatment.

---