alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302(A) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



I, Charley Changmin Yoon, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports
on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust
2015-A (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);



2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports,
taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing
and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange
Act periodic reports;



4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement
required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer
has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and



5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act
Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material
instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.



In giving the certifications above, I have
reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Citibank, N.A.



Date: March 16, 2017



| | By: | /s/ Charley Changmin Yoon                                    
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------
| |     | Name: Charley Changmin Yoon                                  
| |     | Title:  President and Secretary                              
| |     | (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
<Page>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 12b

                     PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC AND GAS COMPANY
               COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

                  PLUS PREFERRED SECURITY DIVIDEND REQUIREMENTS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                     For the Year Ended December 31,
                                                 ---------------------------------------
                                                  2003    2002    2001    2000     1999
                                                 -----   -----   -----   ------   ------
<S>                                              <C>     <C>     <C>     <C>      <C>
Earnings as Defined in Regulation S-K (A):

Pre-Tax Income from Continuing Operations        $ 376   $ 320   $ 324   $  994   $1,163
Fixed Charges                                      397     415     469      462      457
Preferred Securities Pre Tax                        (7)     (7)     (8)     (15)     (15)
                                                 -----   -----   -----   ------   ------
Earnings                                         $ 766   $ 728   $ 785   $1,441   $1,605
                                                 =====   =====   =====   ======   ======

Fixed Charges as Defined in Regulation S-K (B)

Interest Expense                                 $ 390   $ 406   $ 458   $  444   $  440
Interest Factor in Rentals                          --       2       3        3        2
Preferred Securities Dividends                       4       4       5        9        9
Adjustment to state Preferred Securities
   Dividends on a pre-income tax basis               3       3       3        6        6
                                                 -----   -----   -----   ------   ------
Total Fixed Charges                              $ 397   $ 415   $ 469   $  462   $  457
                                                 =====   =====   =====   ======   ======

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                1.93    1.75    1.67     3.12     3.51
                                                 =====   =====   =====   ======   ======
</TABLE>

(A)  The term "earnings" shall be defined as pretax income from continuing
     operations. Add to pretax income the amount of fixed charges adjusted to
     exclude the amount of any interest capitalized during the period.

(B)  Fixed Charges represent (a) interest, whether expensed or capitalized, (b)
     amortization of debt discount, premium and expense and (c) an estimate of
     interest implicit in rentals.
EXHIBIT 23

                  PUBLIC SERVICE ENTERPRISE GROUP INCORPORATED

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


     We consent to the  incorporation  by reference in  Registration  Statements
Nos.  33-44581,  33-44582  and  33-45491  of  Public  Service  Enterprise  Group
Incorporated  on Form S-8 and  Registration  Statement  No.  33-49123  of Public
Service  Enterprise Group  Incorporated on Form S-3 of our report dated February
14,  1997,  appearing  in this  Annual  Report on Form  10-K of  Public  Service
Enterprise Group Incorporated for the year ended December 31, 1996.


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Parsippany, New Jersey
February 26, 1997


<PAGE>



                                                                   EXHIBIT 23(A)


                     PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC AND GAS COMPANY

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


     We consent to the  incorporation  by reference in  Registration  Statements
Nos.  33-49367,  33-50199,  33-51309,  33-52435 and 333-02763 of Public  Service
Electric  and Gas  Company on Forms S-3 of our report  dated  February  14, 1997
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Public Service  Electric and Gas
Company for the year ended December 31, 1996.


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Parsippany, New Jersey
February 26, 1997
<PAGE>

                                  UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT

                       Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
                       the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

         Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): April 1, 2003

                          KINDER MORGAN MANAGEMENT, LLC
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

           Delaware                     1-16459                 76-0669886
 (State or other jurisdiction         (Commission            (I.R.S. Employer
       of incorporation)              File Number)          Identification No.)

                          500 Dallas Street, Suite 1000
                              Houston, Texas 77002
          (Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

                                  713-369-9000
              (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

<PAGE>

Item 9.  Regulation FD Disclosure

     In accordance with General Instruction B.2. of Form 8-K, the following
information shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall it be deemed incorporated
by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

     Representatives of Kinder Morgan, Inc. ("KMI"), Kinder Morgan Energy
Partners, L.P. ("KMP") and Kinder Morgan Management, LLC ("KMR") intend to make
presentations on April 1, 2003 at the 31st Annual Howard Weil Energy Conference
to address company strategy and philosophy, the fiscal year 2003 budget, and
other business information about KMI, KMP and KMR. Prior to the meetings,
interested parties will be able to view the materials presented at the meetings
by visiting KMI's web site at: www.kindermorgan.com/investor/presentations.


                                       2

<PAGE>

                                S I G N A T U R E

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf
by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

                                 KINDER MORGAN MANAGEMENT, LLC

Dated:  March 31, 2003           By:    /s/ Joseph Listengart
                                    ---------------------------------------
                                    Joseph Listengart
                                    Vice President and General Counsel



                                       3
## BCAeronautics MPTOM

In addition to the provisions of this manual all scripted closed set filming for the motion picture and television industry operations will comply with relief exemptions granted under section 333. ( Unless otherwise specified in this grant of exemption, the UAS, the UAS PIC, and the UAS operations must comply with all applicable parts of 14 CFR including, but not limited to, parts 45, 47, 61, and 91).



## Prior to all operations:

At least 3 days before aerial filming, the operator of the UAS affected by this exemption must submit a written Plan of Activities to the local Flight Standards District Office (FSDO) with jurisdiction over the area of proposed filming. The plan of activities must include at least the following: Dates and times for all flights; Name and phone number of the operator for the UAS aerial filming conducted under this grant of exemption; Name and phone number of the person responsible for the on-scene operation of the UAS; Make, model, and serial or N−Number of UAS to be used; Name and certificate number of UAS PICs involved in the aerial filming; A statement that the operator has obtained permission from property owners and/or local officials to conduct the filming production event; the list of those who gave permission must be made available to the inspector upon request; Signature of exemption holder or representative; and A description of the flight activity, including maps or diagrams of any area, city, town, county, and/or state over which filming will be conducted and the altitudes essential to accomplish the operation. Security and the integrity of the sterile area (ground station) will require joint coordination with the participants and personnel of all stakeholders.
# C_2021098EN.01002802.xml

| 22.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 98/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 98/28

---

Action brought on 22 January 2021 — SFD v EUIPO — Allmax Nutrition (ALLNUTRITION DESIGNED FOR MOTIVATION)

(Case T-35/21)

(2021/C 98/32)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: SFD S.A. (Opole, Poland) (represented by: T. Grucelski, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Allmax Nutrition Inc. (North York, Ontario, Canada)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark ALLNUTRITION DESIGNED FOR MOTIVATION — Application for registration No 15 971 435

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 28 October 2020 in Case R 511/2020-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | reject the opposition; |
| --- | --- |

—

reject the opposition;

| — | order EUIPO and the other party before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and the other party before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
# C_2021481EN.01003801.xml

| 29.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 481/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 481/38

---

Action brought on 4 October 2021 — CB v EUIPO — China Construction Bank (CCB)

(Case T-639/21)

(2021/C 481/52)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Groupement des cartes bancaires (CB) (Paris, France) (represented by: C. Herissay-Ducamp, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: China Construction Bank Corp. (Beijing, China)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark CCB — Application for registration No 13 359 609

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 30 July 2021 in Case R 1305/2020-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision, uphold the opposition and reject the application for trade mark No 13 359 609; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision, uphold the opposition and reject the application for trade mark No 13 359 609;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 94 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 94 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1198

FRANKLIN C. REAVES, Ph.D., and others similarly situated, Plaintiff – Appellant,

v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, Willie D. Reaves; HYBERT N. STRICKLAND, individually and in his official capacity; SHERRY RHODES, individually and in her official capacity as Clerk of Court of Marion County; MARION COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; MARK RICHARDSON, individually and in his official capacity as Sheriff of Marion County; DEPUTY SMITH, individually and in his official capacity; DEPUTY DAVIS, individually and in his official capacity; MARION COUNTY JAIL; MARION COUNTY PRISON FARM, TIM HARPER, individually and in his official capacity as Marion County Administrator, Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (4:08-cv-00576-TLW)

Submitted: June 18, 2009 Decided: June 23, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Franklin C. Reaves, Ph.D., Appellant Pro Se. Robert Thomas King, WILLCOX BUYCK & WILLIAMS, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

23 PER CURIAM: Franklin C. Reaves seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell , 551 U.S. 205, __, 127 S. Ct. 2360, 2366 (2007).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on January 20, 2009. The notice of appeal was filed on February 20, 2009. Because Reaves failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
exhibit106.htm


EXHIBIT 10.6


 


 


 








 


August 22, 2013


 


 


Joseph McDevitt


6 Parkside Avenue


London SW19 SES







Dear Joe:







As we discussed, as a condition to the consummation of the Pinewood Transaction, each holder of unsecured convertible debt securities of the Company is required to enter into a form of this Agreement with the Company and elect, effective at the Closing, either to amend and restate the Debenture owned beneficially thereby, as well as the documents relating thereto, in accordance with the conditions below.







Option #1: [   ] Debenture Amendment Election Option #2:  [ X ] Debenture Conversion Election








	
(a)  

	
Option #1:  Debenture Amendment Election.












The Debenture shall be amended and restated to 1) Extend the maturity date from July 20, 2013 to July 20, 2016.  2)  Stated Interest Rate shall be reduced from 16% to 10% and 3) Effective conversion rate shall be reduced from $0.90 to $0.75 per share.








	
(b)  

	
Option #2:  Debenture Conversion Election.












The principal amount of $500,000 and accrued and unpaid interest as of the closing date shall be shall be promptly converted to the Company’s common stock at a conversion price equal to $0.60 per share.  In addition, as an incentive for the conversion, the debenture holder will be issued 3 year warrants to purchase 833,334 common shares at an initial exercise price of $0.60 per share for twelve months from the date of this Agreement, at which time the exercise price shall be increased to $0.75 per share for the remainder of the term of the Warrant.


.


Please advise us of your election as soon as possible so that the applicable legal documents may be drafted.












Debenture Holder Acceptance:


 


 


 


/s/  Jospeh McDevitt                                                                          


      Joseph McDevitt


 







Sincerely,

















/s/   Robert DelVecchio                                   


       Robert DelVecchio


       CEO












 


 


5600 Tennyson Parkway   Suite 390   Plano, TX 75024   Phone: 972 473 4033   Fax: 972 473 4034
EX-4.10



 Exhibit 4.10 

AMENDMENT TO TIGER MEDIA, INC. 

AMENDED AND RESTATED 2008 SHARE INCENTIVE PLAN 
  

On November 12, 2013, the Company’s Board of Directors approved an amendment to Section 3.1(a) of the Plan. On December 17, 2013, the
Company’s stockholders approved the following amendment to Section 3.1(a) of the Plan. 
  

“Subject to the provisions of Article 8 and Section 3.1(b), the aggregate number of Shares which may be issued or transferred pursuant to Awards
under the Plan is 6,000,000.”
### Grafe , Jerom e (DEP )

From : Tany a Hahne l [thahnel1@gmail.com ] Sent : Monday , Septembe r24 , 201 2 1:52 P M To : Grafe , Jerom e (DEP) ; Fichter , Katherin e (DOT) ; Davey , Richar d (DOT) ; Ciampa , Christin e (DOT ) Cc : DeAraujo , Ernani ; anthony.petruccelli@masenate.go v Subject : Blue/Re d Lin e Extensio n Testimon y Dea r Commissione r

Kimmell ,

Ia mwritin g t o as

k yo u t o pleas e suppor t

th e final desig n andconstructio n o f th e Red-Blu e Connecto r betwee n Bowdoi n an dCharle s Stree t station s i n Boston . Thi s connectio n i s acritica l piec e o f infrastructur e tha t

i s very muc hneede dt o connec t communitie s lik e East Bosto n an dRevere t o vita l job s i n th e technology , health , an d pharmaceutica l sectors , whic har e primaril y locate dalon g th e re dline . East Bosto n struggle s t o connec t t o othe r part s o f Boston , andexpandin g acces s t o th e re dlin e withou t havin g t o mak

e multipl e connection s i s a critica l wa

y t o encourag e increase dpubli c transi t us e no t onl y fo r resident s o f

East Boston , bu t

i t als o encourage s traveler s t o th e airport , an dfro mth e Nort hShor e goin g int o Cambridg e t o use th e trai nservic e instea do f

driving , minimizin g th e numbe r o f cars w e have o n ou r

alread y overcrowde dneighborhoo dstreets .

Thi s i s apiec e o f

mitigatio nfo r

th e Bi g Di g aime da

t reducin g pollution . I t too k alo t o f wor k b y environmentalists , citizen s an dpolitica l leader s t o pu t togethe r tha t mitigatio npackage , andI can' t believ e th e stat e an dth e MBT A ar e tryin g t o g o bac k

o n i t now , whe n w e se

e traffi c increasin g ever y da y o n th e surfac e road s o f communitie s alon g Rout e 1 A . Fulfillin g promise dmitigatio nfro mth e Bi g Di g i s lon g overdue , and w e d o no t

expec t tha t yo u wil l continu e you r effort s a t mitigatio ni n Somervill e wit hth e Gree n lin e extensio n whil e continuin g t o ignor e th e Blue-Re dconnector , whic hi s fa r mor e importan t

t o acommunit y tha t continue s t o struggl e wit hdi e highes t rate s o f asthma , an dcontinue s t o suffe r fro mai r pollutio nthank s t o th e increase dtraffi c fro mth e bi g di g an dth e je t fuel s fro mth e airpor t

whic hi s righ t

nex t door . W e shoul dno t hav e t o continu e t o worr y tha t w e wil l b e ignore db y th e Stat e a s yo u revisi t

negotiation s tha t

wer e lon g ago decided .

A s yo u know , th e tunne l already exists . Al l tha t i s necessar

y i s tha t som e structura l wor k

b e don e t o mee t

th e need s o f amoder n facility . Wit hth e technolog y today ther e wil l b e littl e disruptio n o n th e surfac e o r t o transi t operations . B y full y fundin g th e design , an dcompletin g di e plans , w e hop e w e ca n the n expec t

tha t federa l fundin g migh t

b e secure dfo r

th e project .

S o I as k tha t yo u approv e th e fina l desig n an dth e constructio n o f thi s muc hneede dresource . I than k yo u i n advanc e fo r

you r consideratio n an dsupport .
1Sincerely ,

Tany aHahne l 5 5 1 Sumner

Stree t East Boston , M A0212 8