alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 47 (Tuesday, March 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 11221]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5986]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Gauley River National Recreation Area

AGENCY: National Park Service.

ACTION: Availability of final general management plan/final 
environmental impact statement for the Gauley River National Recreation 
Area, Fayette and Nicholas counties, West Virginia.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental 
Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, the National Park Service (NPS) announces 
the availability of a final general management plan/environmental 
impact statement/land protection plan (FGMP/FEIS/LPP) for the Gauley 
River National Recreation Area. The draft environmental impact 
statement was on public review for 150 days from June 6 through 
November 7, 1994.
    Four alternatives for future resource protection, interpretation, 
visitor use, and facility development were presented in the Draft GMP/
EIS/LPP which was distributed for public review. During that review 
period, over 300 comments were received and summarized for use by the 
NPS in its selection of a alternative. As a result of that analysis, 
Alternative B, with minor modifications, was chosen as the proposed 
final plan.
    Key components of the Final GMP/FEIS/LPP are the continuation of 
existing whitewater rafting and boating activities, along with 
providing other recreational opportunities. Land acquisition will be 
needed to implement most of the recommended activities and protection 
measures--such as public access to the river and the development of a 
trails system. Development will be limited to a small visitor and 
operations facility, two small maintenance buildings, parking, two 
middle and one lower river access points, one primitive camping area, 
viewpoints, trails, and minor road improvements.

DATES: The 30-day no action period for review of the FGMP/FEIS/LPP will 
end on April 10, 1997. A record of decision will follow the no action 
period.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Superintendent, Gauley River National 
Recreation Area, PO Box 246, Glen Jean, West Virginia 25846, or 
telephone 304-465-0508.

    Dated: March 5, 1997.
Pete Hart,
Superintendent, Gauley River NRA.
[FR Doc. 97-5986 Filed 3-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
# C_2022441EN.01001401.xml

| 21.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 441/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 441/14

---

Appeal brought on 25 August 2022 by YV against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 15 June 2022 in Case T-533/16, YV and Others v Commission

(Case C-569/22 P)

(2022/C 441/19)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: YV (represented by: L. Levi, J.-N. Louis, avocats)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission, YW, YZ, European Parliament, Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:

| — | set aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 15 June 2022 in Case T-533/16, YV and Others v Commission; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 15 June 2022 in Case T-533/16, YV and Others v Commission;

| — | refer the present case to the Court of Justice for a ruling that the appellant’s action at first instance is well founded; |
| --- | --- |

—

refer the present case to the Court of Justice for a ruling that the appellant’s action at first instance is well founded;

| — | order the defendant at first instance to pay all of the costs at first instance and on appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant at first instance to pay all of the costs at first instance and on appeal.

Grounds of appeal and main arguments

In support of his appeal, the appellant relies on two grounds:

The first ground of appeal alleges infringement of Article 45 TFEU, infringement by the General Court of its obligation to state reasons, error of legal characterisation and distortion of the contents of the file;

The second ground of appeal alleges infringement of the purpose of Article 8 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union and breach of the general principle of proportionality.

---
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 

### 2015

- 7533 Directorate Identifier: 

### 2015

- NM

- 080

- AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then ou t of the changed cell

.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection,

replacement)

Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance)

Work

- hours

(include

access, testing,

and close

- up) Labor

cost

(@$8 5 / h

our) Parts Cost Total Costs

(labor +

parts) Number of

U.S.

Registered

Products Total Cost

for U.S. Fleet



### Inspection 12

. 0 $ 1,020.0

0 $ 1,020.00 

### 55 $ 56,100.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0. 00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00



### T he known number of products in compliance: 

### 0

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 56,100



### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $ 

### 0

On

- Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection,

replacement) Work

- hours

(include access,

testing, and close

up) Labor cost

(@$85/hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product



### Replacement 20.0 $ 1,700.00 

### 90200 $ 91,900.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00



### Special considerations for Economic Analysis ( Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table

that was assumed or might not be obvi ous. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### :

### Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES * NO

* Explanation:

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES * NO

* Explanation:

Re gulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO

Explanation:

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES * NO



### * Explanation 

### :
2013 Form 10-K Ex. 10.37






Exhibit 10.37


UniTek Global Services
1777 Sentry Parkway West
Gwynedd Hall, Suite 302
Blue Bell, PA 19422


March 31, 2014
Daniel Yannantuono
4069 Steeple Chase Drive
Collegeville, PA 19426


Dear Dan:
You and Unitek Global Services Inc. (the “Company”) are currently parties to an Employment Agreement dated July 5, 2009, as amended as of December 1, 2010 (the “Employment Agreement”).  You and the Company have mutually agreed to terminate the Employment Agreement, and to waive the notice provisions set forth in Section 5 of the Employment Agreement.  As consideration for your agreement to terminate the Employment Agreement, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company has approved your participation in the Unitek Global Services Inc. Change in Control Severance Plan, effective upon the termination of the Employment Agreement.  
Accordingly, you and the Company agree that the Employment Agreement, including, but not limited to the non-competition restrictions set forth in Section 9(b) of the Employment Agreement and any other agreement dated prior to March 26, 2014, containing provisions pertaining to a non-competition restriction, are hereby terminated.  It is understood that the termination of the Employment Agreement in accordance with the terms set forth herein does not affect your continued status as an employee of the Company. 
This letter agreement shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Pennsylvania applicable therein, without giving effect to the principles of conflict of laws thereof.
Sincerely,
/s/ Rocky Romanella
Rocky Romanella                    
Chief Executive Officer


Agreed and Accepted:
/s/ Daniel Yannantuono
Daniel Yannantuono


Date:March 31, 2014
KENNETH NELSON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-4429

_____________________________/

Opinion filed January 5, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Columbia County.

Leandra G. Johnson, Judge.

Kenneth Nelson, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, OSTERHAUS, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Somsak Chivavibul,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period
covered by this report on Form 10-K of Navient Student Loan Trust 2015-1 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my
knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing
and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer and administrator have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement and administration agreement, as applicable, in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as indenture trustee.

[Signature Page Follows]



---

|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|Date: March 30, 2016                 
|                                     
|/s/ SOMSAK CHIVAVIBUL                
|Somsak Chivavibul                    
|President and Chief Financial Officer
|(Senior Securitization Officer)      
|Navient Funding, LLC
# C_2022051EN.01003501.xml

| 31.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 51/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 51/35

---

Action brought on 29 November 2021 — Peace United v EUIPO — 1906 Collins (bâoli)

(Case T-754/21)

(2022/C 51/48)

Language in which the application was lodged: French

Parties

Applicant: Peace United Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: M. Artzimovitch, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: 1906 Collins LLC (Miami, Florida, United States)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark bâoli — EU trade mark No 6 619 977

Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 September 2021 in Case R 275/2020-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision in so far as, as a result of various errors of assessment in fact and in law and disregard of the duty of sound administration, the Board of Appeal found that the EU trade mark No 6 619 977 bâoli had not been put to genuine use during the period at issue in respect of the services claimed in Classes 41 and 43; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision in so far as, as a result of various errors of assessment in fact and in law and disregard of the duty of sound administration, the Board of Appeal found that the EU trade mark No 6 619 977 bâoli had not been put to genuine use during the period at issue in respect of the services claimed in Classes 41 and 43;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 63(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council in so far as the Board of Appeal erred in its assessment of the unfairness of the revocation action; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 63(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council in so far as the Board of Appeal erred in its assessment of the unfairness of the revocation action;

| — | Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council in so far as the Board of Appeal erred in its assessment of genuine use of the mark. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council in so far as the Board of Appeal erred in its assessment of genuine use of the mark.

---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 7 (Friday, January 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 1457]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-566]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Notice of Agreement(s) Filed

    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following 
agreement(s) under the Shipping Act of 1984.
    Interested parties can review or obtain copies of agreements at the 
Washington, DC offices of the Commission, 800 North Capitol Street, 
N.W., Room 962. Interested parties may submit comments on an agreement 
to the Secretary, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573, 
within 10 days of the date this notice appears in the Federal Register.

    Agreement No.: 232-011481-003.
    Title: AMA Agreement.
    Parties:

    Hanjin Shipping Co., Ltd.
    Cho Yang Shipping Co., Ltd.
    DSR-Senator Lines
    United Arab Shipping Co. (S.A.G.) (``United Arab'')

    Synopsis: The proposed amendment adds United Arab as a party to the 
Agreement. It also provides that the parties may charter or sub-charter 
space and/or vessels among themselves and further provides that any 
such space may be sub-chartered to third party VOCCs pursuant to 
lawfully effective agreements. The amendment would also permit parties 
to the Agreement to be both an owner and a charterer or a charterer 
only and makes other non-substantive changes to the Agreement.

    Agreement No.: 224-201013.
    Title: City of Los Angeles/American President Lines Non-exclusive 
Preferential Crane Assignment Agreement.
    Parties:

    City of Los Angeles (``City'')
    American President Lines, Ltd. (``APL'')

    Synopsis: The Agreement provides that the City will allow APL to 
use certain shipping cranes on a non-exclusive, preferential basis for 
an initial term which will expire, unless renewed, on July 31, 1997.

    By order of the Federal Maritime Commission.

    Dated: January 6, 1997.
Joseph C. Polking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-566 Filed 1-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                               18 U.S.C. SS 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of CBQ,  Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the
period  ending  June  30,  2002,  as  filed  with the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I, John M.  Albertine,  Chief
Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  SS 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1)  the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


/s/ John M. Albertine
Chief Executive Officer

August 19, 2002
<PAGE>


Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mayor's Jewelers, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the thirteen weeks ended June 28, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
John Ball, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Date: August 7, 2003

/s/ John Ball
-------------------------------------------------
John Ball
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
## • •**December 1.2014** 

### No.**04-14-00574-CV In** **the Interest** **of R.E.S.** **and R.K.S.,** **Children From** **the 407th** **Judicial District** **Court. Bexar** **County. Texas** 

### Trial**Court No.** **2007-CI-04448 lonorable** **Gloria Saldana,** **Judge Presiding** 

### ORDER**In this** **Court's Order** **of September** **24. 2014,** **appellate deadlines** **in this** **case were** **suspended until** **November 10,** **2014, and** **the parties** **were ordered** **to mediation** **with Michael** **W. Jackson.** **Appellant has** **filed letter** **asking for** **an abatement** **extension of** **fifteen to** **twenty days**

### to**attempt to** **finalize the** **negotiations that** **are ongoing.** **The request** **is granted.** **Appellate deadlines** **in this** **case are** **hereby suspended** **until December** **12, 2014.** **No further** **extensions will** **be grunted** **in this** **case. It** **is so** **ORDERED on** **December 1,** **2014. Sandee** **Bryan Marlon,** **Justice**

### IN**WITNESS WHEREOF,** **have hereunto** **set my** **hand and** **affixed the** **sej*l****of the** **said court** **on this** **1st day** **of December,** **2014.**
f10k2013ex10xiii_oceanbio.htm


Exhibit 10.13




OCEAN BIO-CHEM, INC.


 


AMENDMENT NUMBER TWO TO NET LEASE


 


This Amendment Number Two to Net Lease is made and entered into as of this 16 day of May, 2013, by and between PEJE, INC. as Landlord and:



 




	
TENANT:



MAILING ADDRESS:



	
STAR BRITE DISTRIBUTING, INC.


4041 S.W. 47th Avenue


Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33314


	
PHONE:

	
(954) 587-6280


	 	 
	
LEASED PREMISES:

	 
	
BUILDING:

	
TRACT TWELVE, NEW TOWN



COMMERCE CENTER




	
ADDRESS:

	
4041 SW. 47th Avenue 


Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33314











 


The Net Lease dated May 1, 2008 by and between Landlord and Tenant is hereby amended by adding thereto the following provisions:


 


The Term of the Lease shall be extended from May 1, 2018 to and including December 31, 2023 (the "Extended Term").


 


The Tenant has not been in default of this lease. The tenant has occupied, and occupies all the premises described in the contract.


 


When current net lease expires in 2023, by and between Landlord and Tenant, the renewal term will revert back to a period of ten years, without changes, as per Tenant's notification of its intention to exercise his option to renew this Net Lease in conformity with paragraph 30 of the Net Lease Amendment One signed on July the 12th, 2006.


 


The parties agreed to review the terms of this lease at the end of the 3th, 6th and 10th year, at the request of one or the other party.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands and seals, the day and year first above written to this Net Lease Agreement.
Request for Amendment to Exemption N o. 16613

On April 20, 2015 SIMCOM Aviation Training petitioned the FAA for certain exemptions to SFAR 108. Specifically, SIMCOM petitioned for relief from SFAR 108, 5.(4)(b)(3)9ii) , that prescribes, in pertinent part, that a simulator instructor must, within the preceding 12 months, have either 50 hours of MU

- 2B series airplane pilot

- in

- command (PIC) experience or 50 hours providing simulator or flight training device (FTD) instruction for the MU

- 2B. Grant of exemption was issued to SIMCOM on May 3, 2016. Based upon this exemption SIMCOM has proceeded with instructor training under the conditions and limitations as set forth in the exemption. On July 22, 2016 FAA Advisory Circular 91

- 89 was published along with an NPRM dated September 7, 2016. This NPRM will relocate and update the content of SFAR 108 to a newl y cre ated subpart N of Part 9 1. With the elimination of SFAR 108 from the Code of Federal Regulations SIMCOM’s exemption , as referenced to SFAR 108, will cease to be effective. SIMCOM now petitions for an amendment to exemption no. 1 6613 to reference the new rules under Part 91 subpart N with the intent to preserve the exemption previously granted.
p. 1 

# OAR Box 

# 1796 Prepped byKeeia Richards


### Document

Number: 

# 61 ) VI-B-1 2 Docket Number: 

# A-90-3 7

Printed 10/31/2008 4:20:37

PM Sheet 61 of 107P. 2 A-90-3 7 VI-B-1 2 Thi s documen t

ha s bee nmove dt o IV-C- 4 a t th ereques t

o f th eprojec t

officer . I t wa s incorrectl y categoriz e originally .