alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                Exhibit 99.1






                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





         In connection with the quarterly report of The Jones Financial
Companies, L.L.L.P. on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 28, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, John W. Bachmann, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                  in all material respects, the financial condition and
                  results of operations of the Company.


                                       /s/ John W. Bachmann
                                       ---------------------------------------
                                       Chief Executive Officer
                                       The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P.
                                       May 12, 2003






<PAGE>
<PAGE>


                                Exhibit 99.1






                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





         In connection with the quarterly report of The Jones Financial
Companies, L.L.L.P. on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 28, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Steven Novik, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                  in all material respects, the financial condition and
                  results of operations of the Company.




                                       /s/ Steven Novik
                                       ---------------------------------------
                                       Chief Financial Officer
                                       The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P.
                                       May 12, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
balance sheets and statements of operations found on pages 3-5 of the
Company's Form 10-QSB for the year to date, and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          49,694
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,104
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      9,357
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               707,017
<PP&E>                                       2,118,776
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,000,358
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          144,119
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                     3,546,210
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     250,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,000,358
<SALES>                                        212,149
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               256,022
<CGS>                                          123,924
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  331,924
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               588,166
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (75,242)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0 
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (75,242)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0 

</TABLE>
# C_2021431EN.01005501.xml

| 25.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 431/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.10.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 431/55

---

Action brought on 10 September 2021 — Harbaoui v EUIPO — Google (GC GOOGLE CAR)

(Case T-568/21)

(2021/C 431/64)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Zoubier Harbaoui (Paris, France) (represented by: R. Ciullo, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Google LLC (Mountain View, California, United States)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark GC GOOGLE CAR — Application for registration No 18 007 095

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 June 2021 in Case R 902/2020-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO and Google LLC to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and Google LLC to pay the costs.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B)
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-30-1999
<CASH>                                             239
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,548
<ALLOWANCES>                                       788
<INVENTORY>                                     85,912
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               110,693
<PP&E>                                          38,584
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,163
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 247,272
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           53,521
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                3
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     142,854
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   247,272
<SALES>                                         94,100
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                94,100
<CGS>                                           60,242
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   60,242
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                47,775<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   766
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,811
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (15,680)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (15,680)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   8,078
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (7,602)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.28)
<FN>
<F1>OTHER EXPENSES CONSISTS OF ALL OPERATING COSTS AND EXCLUDES INTEREST,
NON-OPERATING INCOME AND INCOME TAXES.
</FN>


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 *


In connection with the Annual Report of PGI Incorporated (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Laurence A. Schiffer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbones-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
         of the Company.



/s/ Laurence A. Schiffer
---------------------------------------
    Laurence A. Schiffer
    Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)           May 4, 2007


<FN>
*A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company
 and will be retained by the Company and will be furnished to the Securities
 and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 10.30






Exhibit 10.30
FIVE BELOW, INC.
COMPENSATION POLICY FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS
(Effective March   , 2014)


		
	1.
	ANNUAL CASH AND STOCK COMPENSATION




•Eligible Directors: Each member of the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) who is not an employee of the Company (a “Non-Employee Director”) and who is not affiliated with Advent International Corporation.


•Annual Cash Retainer.  Each eligible director shall receive $60,000 annually paid in arrears for each fiscal quarter. 


•Additional Annual Retainers for Chairs of Committees who are Eligible Directors: $25,000 annually for the Audit Committee and the Compensation Committee and $15,000 annually for the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, in each case paid quarterly in arrears together with the annual retainer for all eligible directors.  


•Stock in lieu of Retainers: Prior to the end of the fiscal quarter with respect to which such cash retainer relates, an eligible director may elect, in lieu of the cash retainer, to receive fully vested shares of the Company’s common stock (“Shares”) having a Fair Market Value (as such term is defined under the Five Below, Inc. Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”)) equal to the amount of the foregone retainer for such period.  Any such elected Shares will be delivered on or about the last day of the fiscal quarter with respect to which the foregone cash retainer relates. Any fractional Shares will be paid in cash.  


•Annual Equity Award.  At each annual meeting of shareholders, each eligible director will receive a restricted stock unit award having a Fair Market Value equal to $90,000 issued under the Plan and subject to an award agreement (an “Award Agreement”).  Subject to such director’s continued service with the Company, each award shall vest in full at the next annual meeting of shareholders.  Such vesting may be accelerated upon certain events as provided in an Award Agreement.   


		
	2.
	EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT - Each Non-Employee Director will be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket travel expenses incurred in connection with attendance at Board and committee meetings and other Board related activities in accordance with the Company’s plans or policies as in effect from time to time(1).   




		
	3.
	AMENDMENT AND TERMINATION - This Policy may be amended or terminated by the Board at any time.  














































(1)  To the extent that any such reimbursements constitute compensation, (i) such amount shall be reimbursed no later than December 31 of the year following the year in which the expense was incurred, (ii) such amount shall not affect the amount of compensatory expense reimbursements in any subsequent year, and (iii) the right to such reimbursement shall not be subject to liquidation or exchange for any other benefit.
EX-10.8



 Exhibit 10.8 
  





 
 March 20, 2000 
 Mesfin
Demise 
 460 Herndon Parkway 
 Suite 150 

Herndon, VA 20170 
 Dear Mesfin: 

Primus Telecommunications, Inc., (“Primus”) is pleased to offer you full-time employment for the position of Senior Accountant reporting to Andrew
Dolan, Manager, Financial Reporting. Your start date will be Friday, April 7, 2000. Your employment with Primus is “at will” meaning that either you or Primus may terminate the employment relationship at anytime for any reason or no
reason at all. Your first 90 days of employment is considered your probationary period. 
 Your semi-monthly salary will be $1,562.50, which is $37,500.00
annualized. Eligibility for the Company’s employee benefit plans for health, dental, vision, life insurance, AD&D, and disability is May 1st. You will be eligible for the 401
(k) Plan and the Employee Stock Purchase Plan after a standard waiting period, October 1, 2000 and October 7, 2000 respectively. 
 If this
offer is acceptable, please sign in the space below and return this letter to me within seven days. 
  

	
	Sincerely,
	
	/s/ Lori D. Kilfeather
	Lori D. Kilfeather
	Director, Human Resources

  

	Cc:	Andrew Dolan 

  

							
	/s/ Mesfin Demise	  	03/26/00	  	
	Accepted by:	  	Mesfin Demise	  	Date
# C_2023112EN.01003601.xml

| 27.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/36

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 1 February 2023 — Grodno Azot and Khimvolokno Plant v Council

(Case T-117/22 R)

(Application for interim measures - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Belarus - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency)

(2023/C 112/46)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Grodno Azot AAT (Grodno, Belarus), Khimvolokno Plant (Grodno) (represented by: N. Tuominen and L. Engelen, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: A. Boggio-Tomasaz and A. Antoniadis, acting as Agents)

Re:

By their application under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU, the applicants seek the suspension of operation of Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2021/2125 of 2 December 2021 implementing Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus (OJ 2021 L 430 I, p. 16), and of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2124 of 2 December 2021 implementing Article 8a(1) of Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in respect of Belarus (OJ 2021 L 430 I, p. 1), in so far as those measures concern the applicants.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
J-S71007-17

____________________________________

* Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court.

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

v.

JOHN FRENCH III 

Appellant

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

 PENNSYLVANIA

 No. 170 EDA 2017

Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence December 9, 2016

In the Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County 

Criminal Division at No(s): CP-09-CR-0002031-2013 

 CP-09-CR-0002247-2016

 CP-09-CR-0008036-2012 

BEFORE: PANELLA, J., STABILE, J., and PLATT*, J.

JUDGMENT ORDER BY PANELLA, J. FILED MARCH 06, 2018

Appellant, John French III, challenges the discretionary aspects of the 

sentence imposed after he was found to have violated his parole and 

probation when he pled guilty to simple assault. All of the relevant 

convictions arise from the combination of French’s narcotics addictions and 

the mother of his children, who was the victim in each of the crimes. Due to 

the persistent theme of violence against the victim in all of these crimes, the 

court sentenced French outside of the sentencing guidelines for his simple 

assault conviction to the statutory maximum sentence of one to two years’ 

imprisonment. For violating his probation and parole on the previous 

sentences, the court sentenced French to an additional 8 to 24 months’ 

imprisonment, for an aggregate sentence of 20 to 48 months.
J-S71007-17

- 2 -

French did not file a post-sentence motion, instead choosing to file the 

instant appeal. His sole issue on appeal is that the court abused its 

discretion in imposing sentence. French concedes this is a challenge to the 

discretionary aspects of his sentence. See Appellant’s Brief, at 13. “[I]ssues 

challenging the discretionary aspects of a sentence must be raised in a postsentence motion or by presenting the claim to the trial court during the 

sentencing proceedings. Absent such efforts, an objection to a discretionary 

aspect of a sentence is waived.” Commonwealth v. Shugars, 895 A.2d 

1270, 1273-1274 (Pa. Super. 2006) (citation omitted). 

French failed to present this claim at sentencing and failed to file a 

post-sentence motion. Accordingly, we find this claim waived.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

Judgment Entered.

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq.

Prothonotary

Date: 3/6/18
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AP RIL 12, 2019

NO. 03
- 18
- 00118
- CV

Eric Jonjak, Appellant

v. Kathye Marlene Griffith, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 98TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BA KER, A ND SMITH MODIFIED AND, AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED
-- OPINION BY JUSTICE SMITH

This is an appeal from the judgment signed b y the trial court on December 1, 2017 . Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the trial court’s judgment but that there was error requiring correction. Therefore, the Court modifies th e trial court’s judgment and qualified domestic relations order (QDRO)

. We modify the trial court’s judgment so that paragraph R

- 5 reads as follows: A portion of Eric Jonjak’s retirement benefits in Bog Farm Pr ofit Sharing 401k Acct. No. 803508

- 00000 arising out of ERIC JONJAK’S employment with Bog Farm as of June 1, 2017, that portion being $962,000. We modify paragraph 2 of the QDRO to delete the sentence that reads: [Griffith’s] intere st in the Plan shall be adjusted for investment earnings and losses allocable thereto in accordance withthe terms of the Plan thereafter. The Court affirms the judgment as modified. The appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 44 (Thursday, March 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 10255]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5725]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

BROADCASTING BOARD OF GOVERNORS


Sunshine Act Meeting

DATE AND TIME: March 11, 1997; 9:30 a.m.

PLACE: Cohen Building, Visitor's Center, First Floor, 330 Independence 
Ave., S.W., Washington, D.C. 20547.

OPEN MEETING: The members of the Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG) 
will meet in open session to address a variety of issues relating to 
U.S. Government-funded non-military international broadcasting. Among 
the subjects on the agenda are the following: opening remarks by the 
BBG Chairman; approval of minutes of a previous meeting; remarks by 
Kevin Klose, Director-designate of the International Broadcasting 
Bureau; remarks by Evelyn Lieberman, new Director of the Voice of 
America; and miscellaneous subjects relating to the Board's 
responsibilities such as the annual report to the President and the 
Congress.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Persons interested in obtaining 
more information about the meeting should contact Brenda Thomas at 
(202) 401-3736.

    Dated: March 4, 1997.
David W. Burke,
Chairman.
[FR Doc. 97-5725 Filed 3-4-97; 2:37 pm]
BILLING CODE 8230-01-M
# C_2022368EN.01002004.xml

| 26.9.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 368/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.9.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 368/20

---

Order of the President of the Court of 27 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Erfurt — Germany) — HK v Allianz Lebensversicherungs AG

(Case C-2/22) (1)

(2022/C 368/35)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 148, 4.4.2022.

---
#### Florence McMillan v. D. W. McMillan.

154 So. 850.

Order Entered May 14, 1934.

*E. C. Maxwell*and *Beggs & Beggs,*for Appellant;

*Wm. Fisher,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

— The appeal herein is by the wife from a decree granting a divorce to the husband. A petition filed *764by the appellant alleges that she is without necessary funds and prays that the appellee be required to pay the appellant alimony during the pending of this appeal, together with suit money and counsel fees. Upon consideration it is ordered that the appellee do pay to the appellant for attorney fees for her counsel in prosecuting this appeal the sum of five hundred dollars and it is further ordered that the prayers for temporary alimony and for suit money are severally denied.

Davis, C. J,, and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.