Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 45 / Friday, March 7, 1997 / Notices 10579

Preferred Alternative in the Draft RMP/

EIS and Draft RMPA/EIS. Comments on

the draft plans received from the public

and internal BLM review were

incorporated in the Proposed RMP/FEIS

and the Proposed RMPA/FEIS.

All parts of the Proposed RMP and

Proposed RMPA may be protested by

parties who participated in the planning

process. A protesting party may raise

only those issues which he or she

submitted for the record during the

planning process. Specific protest

procedures are described in the User’s

Guide section of the Proposed RMP/

RMPA/FEIS. Protest procedures also can

be obtained on the Internet at http://

www.nm.blm.gov, or by contacting the

Roswell District Office at the address

listed below under FURTHER

INFORMATION.

DATES: Protests on the Proposed Roswell

RMP/FEIS or the Proposed Carlsbad

RMPA/FEIS must be postmarked no

later than the last day of the protest

period, which is April 5, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Protests on the Proposed

Roswell RMP/FEIS or the Proposed

Carlsbad RMPA/FEIS must be filed in

writing to: Director (WO–210), Bureau

of Land Management, Attn: Brenda

Williams, 1849 C Street, N.W.,

Washington, D.C. 20240.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

David Stout, Bureau of Land

Management, Roswell District Office,

2909 West Second Street, Roswell, New

Mexico, 88201, telephone 505–627–

0272.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The

Proposed Roswell RMP/FEIS and the

Proposed Carlsbad RMP/FEIS are

published as a single document

composed of two volumes. Volume 1

contains the Proposed Plan and

Proposed Plan Amendment, and

supporting material. Volume 2 contains

public comments and the BLM’s

responses to those comments. The

alternatives considered in the Draft

RMP/EIS and Draft RMPA/EIS, the

environmental effects of those

alternatives, the affected environment

discussion, some appendixes and the

references have not been reprinted in

the Proposed RMP/RMPA/FEIS. It is

necessary, therefore, to use both the

Draft and Final EIS documents for a

complete review of the EIS.

Copies of the Draft RMP/RMPA/EIS

and the Proposed RMP/RMPA/FEIS may

be obtained from the Roswell District

Office, at the address listed above in

FURTHER INFORMATION. Volume 1 of the

Proposed RMP/RMPA/FEIS can be

viewed on, and downloaded from, the

Internet at http://www.nm.blm.gov.

The Proposed Plan is a complete,

comprehensive management proposal

for the public surface and mineral estate

in the Roswell Resource Area. The

Proposed Plan Amendment is a

complete, comprehensive management

proposal for oil and gas resources on

public lands in the Carlsbad Resource

Area. The Proposed Plan and Proposed

Plan Amendment are refinements of the

BLM’s Preferred Alternative presented

in the Draft RMP/RMPA/EIS, which was

made available for public review in

November 1994. Comments from the

public, review by BLM staff, and new

information developed since the

distribution of the draft have prompted

some changes in the Preferred

Alternative. The environmental effects

of the Proposed Plan and Proposed Plan

Amendment are not greatly different

from those of the Preferred Alternative.

The Proposed Plan focuses on the

comprehensive management of the

public lands and the resolution of four

key issues and two management

opportunities, which were identified

with public involvement early in the

planning processes. The issues are: (1)

Oil and Gas Operations; (2) Land Tenure

Adjustment; (3) Access; and, (4) Special

Management Areas. The management

opportunities are: (1) Recreation; and,

(2) Wildlife Habitat Management.

The Proposed Plan Amendment

focuses on comprehensive management

of the oil and gas resources on public

lands and the resolution of the key issue

of Oil and Gas Operations, which was

identified with public involvement

early in the planning processes.

At the end of the 30-day protest

period, the Proposed RMP and the

Proposed RMPA will become final. If

protests are filed, however, approval of

the entire RMP or RMPA, or both, will

be withheld pending resolution of the

protests. The Approved RMP and

Approved RMPA will be published

following approval of the Record of

Decision (ROD) for each plan.

Individuals wanting to comment on one

or both of the plans, but not wanting to

file a protest, may send comments to the

BLM, Roswell District Office, 2909 West

Second Street, Roswell, New Mexico,

88201, within the 30-day protest period.

Comments received will be considered

in the preparation of the RODs.

Copies of the Proposed RMP/RMPA/

FEIS have been distributed to a mailing

list of participants in the planning

process and other interested parties.

Single copies of the Proposed RMP/

RMPA/FEIS may be obtained from the

Roswell District Office at the address

listed above under FURTHER

INFORMATION. Copies may be reviewed at

any BLM office in New Mexico or

Oklahoma; at public libraries in

Alamogordo, Albuquerque, Artesia,

Carlsbad, Clovis, Eunice, Fort Sumner,

Hobbs, Jal, Lovington, Portales, Roswell,

Ruidoso, Santa Rosa, Tatum, and

Tucumcari, New Mexico; in school

libraries in Capitan, Carrizozo, Corona,

and Vaughn, New Mexico; and in

university libraries in Las Cruces,

Carlsbad, Roswell, and Portales, New

Mexico.

In accordance with the provisions of

36 CFR Part 800, parties who are

interested in and who wish to be

involved in future activity planning and

implementation of management actions

that may involve or affect the

archeological and historical resource

aspects addressed in the Proposed Plan

or Proposed Plan Amendment are

requested to identify themselves.

Contact the Roswell District Office at

the address listed above under FURTHER

INFORMATION to be placed on a future

contact list.

Dated: February 24, 1997.

Edwin L. Roberson,

District Manager.

[FR Doc. 97–5513 Filed 3–6–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–VA–P

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decrees

Pursuant to the Comprehensive

Environmental Response,

Compensation and Liability Act

Notice is hereby given that three

proposed consent decrees in United

States v. Farmer Oil, et al., Civil Action

No. 95–CV–3231, were lodged on

February 14, 1997, with the United

States District Court for the Northern

District of Georgia. The consent decrees

settle claims against separate defendants

brought under Section 107(a) of the

Comprehensive Environmental

Response, Compensation, and Liability

Act (‘‘CERCLA’’), 42 U.S.C. 9607(a), for

response costs incurred by the United

States at the Daytona Antifreeze site (the

‘‘Daytona site’’) in Marietta, Georgia.

Under the proposed consent decrees,

defendant Houghton International, Inc.

(‘‘Houghton’’) will pay $133,000 to the

United States in reimbursement of

response costs incurred by the

Environmental Protection Agency

(‘‘EPA’’) in connection with the Daytona

site, while defendants Farmer Oil

Company, Inc. (‘‘Farmer’’) and

American Environmental Contractors,

Inc. (‘‘American’’) will each pay $20,000

in reimbursement. EPA has incurred

costs in excess of $357,000 in

connection with the Daytona site.
10580 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 45 / Friday, March 7, 1997 / Notices

Previous settlements with defendants

Watkins Omega, Inc. and Enterprise

Waste Oil Company, Inc. have secured

$45,000 in reimbursement.

The Department of Justice will

receive, for a period of thirty (30) days

from the date of this publication,

comments relating to the proposed

consent decrees. Comments should be

addressed to the Assistant Attorney

General for the Environment and

Natural Resources Division, Department

of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20530, and

should refer to United States v. Farmer

Oil, et al., DOJ Ref. #90–11–2–1145A.

The proposed consent decrees may be

examined at the Office of the United

States Attorney, Richard Russell Federal

Building, Suite 1800, 75 Spring Street,

S.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30335; the Region

4 Office of the Environmental Protection

Agency, 100 Alabama Street, S.W.,

Atlanta, Georgia 30303; and at the

Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street,

N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, D.C.

20005, (202) 624–0892. A copy of the

proposed consent decrees may be

obtained in person or by mail from the

Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street,

N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, D.C.

20005. In requesting a copy please refer

to the referenced case and enclose a

check in the amount of $3.50 for the

Consent Decree between the U.S. and

Houghton International; $3.75 for the

Consent Decree between the U.S. and

American Environmental Contractors,

Inc.; and $4.00 for the Consent Decree

between the U.S. and Farmer Oil, Inc.

(25 cents per page reproduction costs)

payable to the Consent Decree Library.

Joel M. Gross,

Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section,

Environment and Natural Resources Division.

[FR Doc. 97–5593 Filed 3–6–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–15–M

Notice of Lodging of Two Consent

Decrees Pursuant to the

Comprehensive Environmental

Response, Compensation, and Liability

Act of 1980 as Amended

In accordance with Department of

Justice policy and 42 U.S.C. 9622(i),

notice is hereby given that a proposed

partial consent decree in United States

v. International Paper Company, et al.,

Civil No. 94–4681 (BDP); Warwick

Administrative Group, et al. v. Avon

Products, Inc., et al., Civil No. 92–9469

(BDP) (Consolidated Cases), was lodged

on February 14, 1997, with the United

States District Court for the Southern

District of New York. The decree

resolves claims of the United States

against Revere Smelting and Refining

Corporation and Lightron Corporation

in the above-referenced action under the

Comprehensive Environmental

Response, Compensation, and Liability

Act (‘‘CERCLA’’) for contamination at

the Warwick Superfund Site in the

Town of Warwick, Orange County, New

York (the ‘‘Site’’). In the proposed

partial consent decree, Revere Smelting

and Refining Corporation agrees to pay

the United States $1,070, and Lightron

Corporation agrees to pay the United

States $5,704 in settlement of the United

States’ claims for response costs

incurred and to be incurred by the

Environmental Protection Agency at the

Site.

The Department of Justice will

receive, for a period of thirty (30) days

from the date of this publication,

comments relating to the proposed

consent decree. Comments should be

addressed to the Assistant Attorney

General for the Environment and

Natural Resources Division, Department

of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20530, and

should refer to United States v.

International Paper Company, et al.,

DOJ Ref. Number 90–11–3–812.

The proposed consent decree may be

examined at the Office of the United

States Attorney, 100 Church Street, New

York, NY 10007; the Region II Office of

the Environmental Protection Agency,

290 Broadway, New York, NY 10278;

and the Consent Decree Library, 1120 G

Street, NW., 4th Floor, Washington, DC

20005, (202) 624–0892. A copy of the

proposed consent decree may be

obtained in person or by mail from the

Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street,

NW., 4th Floor, Washington, DC 20005.

In requesting a copy, please refer to the

referenced case and enclose a check in

the amount of $6.00 for the partial

consent decree (25 cents per page

reproduction costs) payable to the

Consent Decree Library.

Joel M. Gross,

Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section,

Environment and Natural Resources Division.

[FR Doc. 97–5594 Filed 3–6–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–15–M

[AAG/A Order No. 128–97]

Privacy Act System of Records

This notice is provided as required by

the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a). The

Department of Justice, Immigration and

Naturalization Service (INS), is

republishing Subsection M. of ‘‘The

Immigration and Naturalization Service

Index System, Justice/INS–001,’’—last

published October 5, 1993 (58 FR

51847)—as a separate system of records

to be entitled ‘‘Office of Internal Audit

Investigations Index and Records,

JUSTICE/INS–002.’’ Subsection M. is

being redescribed as a separate system

of records to improve the clarity and

accuracy of the system description, e.g.,

to remove inapplicable routine use

disclosure provisions and exemptions,

re-evaluate and promulgate the

appropriate exemptions, and add two

new routine use disclosure provisions

identified as C. and H.

5 U.S.C. 552a(e) (4) and (11) provide

that the public be given a 30-day period

in which to comment on new routine

use disclosures. The Office of

Management and Budget (OMB), which

has oversight responsibilities under the

Act, requires a 40-day period in which

to conclude its review of the proposal.

Therefore, please submit any

comments by April 7, 1997. The public,

OMB, and the Congress are invited to

send written comments to Patricia E.

Neely, Program Analyst, Information

Management and Security Staff, Justice

Management Division, Department of

Justice, Washington, DC 20530 (Room

850, WCTR Building).

In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552a(r),

the Department has provided a report to

OMB and the Congress.

Dated: February 11, 1997.

Stephen R. Colgate,

Assistant Attorney General for

Administration.

JUSTICE/INS–002

SYSTEM NAME:

Office of Internal Audit Investigations

Index and Records

SYSTEM LOCATION:

Headquarters office, Immigration

Naturalization Service (INS), 425 I

Street, NW, Washington, DC In addition,

field offices of the INS have access only

to hardcopy files during an

investigation. A complete address list is

detailed in JUSTICE/INS–999.

CATEGORIES OF INDIVIDUALS COVERED BY THE

SYSTEM:

In connection with its investigative

duties, the Office of Internal Audit

(OIA) will maintain records on the

following categories of individuals:

(a) Individuals or entities who are or

have been the subject of inquiries or

investigations conducted by the INS

including current or former employees;

current and former consultants,

contractors, and subcontractors with

whom the agency has contracted and

their employees; and such other

individuals or entities whose

association with the INS relates to

alleged violation(s) of the INS’ rules of

conduct, the Civil Service merit system,

and/or criminal or civil law, which may

affect the integrity of the INS.