alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Submitted October 23, 2015,

affirmed March 29,

petition for review denied August 24, 2017 (361 Or 803)

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Plaintiff-Respondent, v.*JUSTIN BOYD LOUDEN, *Defendant-Appellant.*

Clackamas County Circuit Court

CR1300615; A154896

391 P3d 913

Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, and Stephanie J. Hortsch, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the opening brief for appellant. Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Stephanie J. Hortsch, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the reply brief and a supplemental brief. Justin Boyd Louden filed a supplemental brief *pro se.*

Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Anna M. Joyce, Solicitor General, and Patrick M. Ebbett, Assistant Attorney General, filed the briefs for respondent.

Before Ortega, Presiding Judge, and Lagesen, Judge, and Garrett, Judge.

*612PER CURIAM

After waiving his right to a jury trial, defendant was convicted by a trial court of three counts of first-degree sexual abuse, ORS 163.427; six counts of first-degree sodomy, ORS 163.405; and three counts of third-degree sexual abuse, ORS 163.415. He appeals, assigning error to the admission of evidence of defendant’s prior sexual conduct with the same victim, which the trial court admitted over defendant’s objection. On appeal, defendant argues that, since his conviction, the court has held in *State v. Williams,*357 Or 1, 346 P3d 455 (2015), that this type of evidence in a child sexual abuse case1 is inadmissible if the trial court fails to conduct OEC 403 balancing, weighing the probative value of the evidence against the danger of unfair prejudice. Defendant specifically contends that due process required the trial court, in a child sexual abuse case, to conduct OEC 403 balancing before admitting evidence of a defendant’s prior sexual conduct with the same victim. However, defendant did not raise OEC 403 or due process arguments to the trial court below. Consequently, defendant has not preserved those arguments, and we will not consider them for the first time on appeal. *See State v. Woods,*284 Or App 559, 563, 393 P3d 1188 (2017) (where prior uncharged sexual conduct is offered to show defendant’s sexual propensity for the victim, any error in the trial court’s failure to conduct OEC 403 balancing will not be considered on appeal if defendant has not raised an OEC 403 or due process argument to the trial court).2

Affirmed.

1

 Defendant does not dispute the state’s contention in its answering brief that, under the holding of *State v. McKay,*309 Or 305, 308, 787 P3d 479 (1990), evidence of defendant’s sexual predisposition toward the same child victim was relevant evidence.

2

 Through a *pro se*brief, defendant also assigns error to the trial court’s admission of expert testimony. Because that error was also unpreserved, defendant argues that it was error apparent on the face of the record. We reject that argument without further discussion.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 46 (Monday, March 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 10877]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5856]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service


Cape Cod National Seashore South Wellfleet, Massachusetts Cape 
Cod National Seashore Advisory Commission; Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given in accordance with the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770, 5 U.S.C. App 1, section 
10), that a meeting of the Cape Cod National Seashore Advisory 
Commission will be held on Friday, March 28, 1997.
    The Commission was reestablished pursuant to Public Law 99-349, 
Amendment 24. The purpose of the Commission is to consult with the 
Secretary of the Interior, or his designee, with respect to matters 
relating to the development of the Cape Cod National Seashore, and with 
respect to carrying out the provisions of sections 4 and 5 of the Act 
establishing the Seashore.
    The Commission members will convene at Headquarters, Marconi 
Station at 10:00 a.m. for a field trip to the former North Truro Air 
Force Station.
    The Commission members will then meet at 1:00 p.m. at Headquarters, 
Marconi Station, for their regular business meeting which will be held 
for the following reasons:

1. Adoption of Agenda
2 Approval of Minutes of Previous Meeting (01/31/97)
3. Reports of Officers
    Use & Occupancy
    GMP
    Nickerson Fund
4. Superintendent's Report
    Site Planning--(Fort Hill, Pamet Cranberry Bog, former North Truro 
AFS)
    Dune Shacks
    Hatches Harbor/Airport
    News from Washington
5. Old Business--Advisory Commission Handbook
6. New Business--Follow-up discussions--Former North Truro AFS--New 
name?
7. Agenda for next meeting
8. Date for next meeting
9. Public comment
10. Adjournment

    The meeting is open to the public. It is expected that 15 persons 
will be able to attend the meeting in addition to the Commission 
members.
    Interested persons may make oral/written presentations to the 
Commission during the business meeting or file written statements. Such 
requests should be made to the park superintendent at least seven days 
prior to the meeting. Further information concerning the meeting may be 
obtained from the Superintendent, Cape Cod National Seashore, 99 
Marconi Site Road, Wellfleet, MA 02667.
Richard Obernesser,
Acting Superintendent.
[FR Doc. 97-5856 Filed 3-7-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          93,877
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   90,539
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      12,500,237
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,410,036
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,832,204
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          753,563
<BONDS>                                      6,807,655
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (926,354)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,832,204
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               286,784
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  531,241
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             247,732
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (653,740)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (653,740)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (653,740)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (58.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 45 (Friday, March 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10595-10596]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5576]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Partial Differential Equations in Mathematical Sciences; Notice 
of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting.

    Name and Committee Code: Partial Differential Equations in 
Mathematical Sciences (1204).
    Dates and Times: March 24-26, 1997; 8:30 a.m. until 5:00 p.m.
    Place: Room 1060, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson 
Boulevard Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. William Faris, Program Director, National 
Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230. 
Telephone: (703) 306-1879.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate the Analysis/Applied Program 
nominations/

[[Page 10596]]

 applications as part of the selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. 
These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (4) and (6) of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: March 3, 1997.
Linda Allen Benton,
Deputy Director, Division of Human Resource Management, Acting 
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-5576 Filed 3-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel; Placed-based Health Inequalities in Mid-life.                    

*Date:*                         June 8-9, 2022.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Rajarsri Roy, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Gateway Building 2W200, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-6477,                         *rajasri.roy@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: March 30, 2022.

Miguelina Perez,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2022-07112 Filed 4-4-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Exhibit
10.40




February
25, 2010




William
S. Ayer, Chairman


Puget
Energy, Inc.


Puget
Sound Energy, Inc.


10885 NE
4th Street


Bellevue,
WA 98004





Re:           Waiver
of Change in Control Rights





Dear
Bill:





As you
are aware, I am party to an employment agreement with Puget Sound Energy, Inc.
and Puget Energy, Inc. dated as of January 1, 2002, as subsequently amended by
amendments effective as of May 12, 2005, February 9, 2006 and February 28, 2008
(the "Agreement").  Section 7(e) of the Agreement, including but not
limited subsections (A) through (C) of that section, provides certain payments
and other benefits upon a Change in Control (as defined therein) (the "Change in
Control Rights").





I hereby
knowingly, irrevocably and permanently waive any Change in Control Rights as
described in Section 7(e) of the Agreement, effective as of December 31,
2009.





Pursuant
to Section 15 of the Agreement, I respectfully request that you please
acknowledge this waiver by signing below.





Best
Regards,








/s/ Stephen P. Reynolds


Stephen
P. Reynolds


Chief
Executive Officer and President


Puget
Energy, Inc. and Puget Sound Energy, Inc.








Acknowledged
this 25 day of February, 2010.





Puget
Energy, Inc.


Puget
Sound Energy, Inc.











/s/ William S.
Ayer


William
S. Ayer, Chairman
No. 11-10366.

#### Johnson *v.*Sherry, Warden.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### COM. v. QUINN, M.

1540 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/26/2017

CP-51-CR-0008586-2014

(Philadelphia)

Reversed/Remanded
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 47 (Tuesday, March 11, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 11130]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6028]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ARCHITECTURAL AND TRANSPORTATION BARRIERS COMPLIANCE BOARD

36 CFR Parts 1190 and 1191


Accessibility Guidelines for Play Facilities; Notice of Meeting 
of Regulatory Negotiation Committee

AGENCY: Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board.

ACTION: Notice of committee meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board 
(Access Board) has established a regulatory negotiation committee to 
develop a proposed rule on accessibility guidelines for newly 
constructed and altered play facilities covered by the Americans with 
Disabilities Act and the Architectural Barriers Act. This document 
announces the dates, times, and location of the next meeting of the 
committee, which is open to the public.

DATES: The committee will meet on: Wednesday, April 2, 1997, 8:30 a.m. 
to 5:00 p.m.; Thursday, April 3, 1997, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.; Friday, 
April 4, 1997, 8:30 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The committee will meet at the Consumer Product Safety 
Commission, 4330 East-West Highway (North Tower), Bethesda, Maryland.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Greenwell, Office of Technical 
and Information Services, Architectural and Transportation Barriers 
Compliance Board, 1331 F Street, NW., suite 1000, Washington, DC, 
20004-1111. Telephone number (202) 272-5434 extension 34 (Voice); (202) 
272-5449 (TTY). This document is available in alternate formats 
(cassette tape, braille, large print, or computer disc) upon request.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In February 1996, the Access Board 
established a regulatory negotiation committee to develop a proposed 
rule on accessibility guidelines for newly constructed and altered play 
facilities covered by the Americans with Disabilities Act and the 
Architectural Barriers Act. (61 FR 5723, February 14, 1996.) The 
committee will hold its next meeting on the dates and at the location 
announced above. The meeting is open to the public. The meeting site is 
accessible to individuals with disabilities. Individuals with hearing 
impairments who require sign language interpreters should contact Peggy 
Greenwell by March 24, 1997, by calling (202) 272-5434 extension 34 
(voice) or (202) 272-5449 (TTY).

Lawrence W. Roffee,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 97-6028 Filed 3-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8150-01-P
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8718 

To extend the statute of limitations for offenses under the Federal Election 

Campaign Act of 1971. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 30, 2020 

Ms. SPEIER (for herself, Ms. LEE of California, Ms. NORTON, and Ms. 

VELA ́ZQUEZ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To extend the statute of limitations for offenses under the 

Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR 

4 OFFENSES UNDER FEDERAL ELECTION CAM5 PAIGN ACT OF 1971. 

6 (a) CIVIL OFFENSES.—Section 309(a) of the Federal 

7 Election Campaign Act of 1971 (52 U.S.C. 30109(a)) is 

8 amended by inserting after paragraph (9) the following 

9 new paragraph: 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8718 IH

1 ‘‘(10) No person shall be subject to a civil penalty 

2 under this subsection with respect to a violation of this 

3 Act unless a complaint is filed with the Commission with 

4 respect to the violation under paragraph (1), or the Com5 mission responds to information with respect to the viola6 tion which is ascertained in the normal course of carrying 

7 out its supervisory responsibilities under paragraph (2), 

8 not later than 15 years after the date on which the viola9 tion occurred.’’. 

10 (b) CRIMINAL OFFENSES.—Section 406(a) of such 

11 Act (52 U.S.C. 30145(a)) is amended by striking ‘‘5 

12 years’’ and inserting ‘‘10 years’’. 

13 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

14 this section shall apply with respect to violations occurring 

15 on or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>


                                                                     EXHIBIT 32c


        Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18
                            of the United States Code


     I, E. James Ferland, Chief Executive Officer of Public Service Electric and
Gas Company, to the best of my knowledge, certify that (i) the Annual Report of
Public Service Electric and Gas Company on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of Public Service Electric and Gas Company.


                                         /s/ E. James Ferland
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         E. James Ferland
                                         Public Service Electric and Gas Company
                                         Chief Executive Officer
                                         February 28, 2005
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
S HAUN RUSHING , ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 1:21- cv -02026 ( UNA ) ) N.A.A.C.P. , ) ) Defendant. )
MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff, appearing pro se , has filed a complaint and an accompanying application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”)

. Plaintiff is a resident of Grand Rapids, Michigan, and has sued the N.A.A.C.P ., though provides no address for the defendant. Preliminarily, the Local Rules of this court state: “[t] he first filing by or on behalf of a party shall have in the caption the name and full residence address of the party. ” LCvR 5.1(c). For reasons explained below , the court will grant the IFP application and dismiss the complaint pursuant to F ederal Rule 8(a).
P ro se litigants must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch , 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires complaints to contain “(1) a short and plain statement of the grounds for the court’s jurisdiction [and] (2) a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal , 556 U.S. 662, 678

- 79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA , 355 F.3d 661, 668

- 71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). The Rule 8 standard ensures that defendants receive fair notice of the claim being asserted so that they can prepare a responsive answer and an adequate defense and determine whether the doctrine of res judicata applies. Brown v. Califano , 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).Here, the complaint merely alleges that plaintiff “was discr iminated against by the N.A.A.C.P. [from] 2004

– 2007[,]” and that plaintiff “asked for assistance, etc.[,] [b]ut was ignored[.]” Plaintiff goes on to state that an unspecified “violation against [plaintiff] was clear and on the record.” As a result, plain tiff seeks “110 trillion dollars.” The remainder of the complaint is incomprehensible. These ambiguous allegations fail to provide adequate notice of a claim. The causes of action, and authority relied upon, if any, are completely undefined. The plead ing also fails to set forth allegations with respect to this court’s jurisdiction or venue, or a valid basis for an award of damages. In fact, it is unclear what actual damages, if any, plaintiff has suffered. While plaintiff mentions “discrimination,” t here is no articulation of the specific circumstances, location, context , or type, of any discrimination allegedly endured , or even who committed the alleged wrongdoing. The complaint, therefore, fails to meet the minimal pleading requirements of Rule 8(a) of the Fe deral Rules of Civil Procedure , and is dismissed without prejudice

. A separate order of dismissal accompanies this memorandum opinion.

Date: August 17, 2021 / s /______________________ EMMET G. SULLIVAN United States District Judge
U.S. ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION

633 3rd St. NW, Suite 200

Washington, DC 20001

Major Updates of the Voluntary Voting System Guidelines 2.0

On February 10, 2021 the U.S. Election Assistance Commission adopted the Voluntary Voting System 

Guidelines (VVSG) 2.0. The major updates included in the VVSG 2.0 are the following:

• Improved cybersecurity requirements to secure voting and election management systems 

associated with the administration of elections.

o Software independence

o Requires systems to be air-gapped from other networks and disallows the use of wireless 

technologies

o Physical security

o Multi-factor authentication

o System integrity

o Data protection

• Interoperability

o Ensures devices are capable of importing and exporting data in common data formats

o Requires manufacturers to provide complete specifications of how the format is 

implemented

o Requires that encoded data uses a publicly available method

• Improved accessibility requirements to enhance the voting experience for voters with 

disabilities:

o VVSG 2.0 allows for systems where all voters can vote privately and independently 

throughout the voting process:

▪ Marking

▪ Verifying

▪ Casting

o Language access throughout the process

o Improved documentation requirements for accessibility testing

o Voter privacy features

o Accessibility requirements derived from federal laws

• Other Changes

o Ballot secrecy

o Improved auditability

o User-centered design

o Reorganized to simplify usage and focus on functional requirements

• Manuals

o Penetration testing

o Component testing pilot program

Additional information and the full text of the VVSG 2.0 can be found on the EAC’s website.