alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the 
Consolidated Balance Sheet and Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations 
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          19,267
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   67,299
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,732)
<INVENTORY>                                     61,926
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               177,618
<PP&E>                                          81,665
<DEPRECIATION>                                (25,028)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 589,404
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           99,685
<BONDS>                                        434,458
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           591
<OTHER-SE>                                      39,962
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   589,404
<SALES>                                         81,995
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                81,995
<CGS>                                           46,970
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   46,970
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                32,369
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   100
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,693
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,915)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,600)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,315)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,315)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.07)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                             356
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,587
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,684
<INVENTORY>                                     46,110
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                89,091
<PP&E>                                          17,075
<DEPRECIATION>                                  34,214
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 112,476
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           75,201
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           760
<OTHER-SE>                                      36,515
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   112,476
<SALES>                                         92,923
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                92,923
<CGS>                                           80,094
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   80,094
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,430
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,821
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,422)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,905)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,517)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,517)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.46)
        

</TABLE>
# Oklahoma

- U.S. Department of Education Approves Oklahoma’s Plan for Use of American Rescue Plan Funds to Support K-12 Schools and Students, Distributes Remaining $498 Million To State Today, the U.S.  Department of Education (Department) announced the approval of Oklahoma's  American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ARP  ESSER) plan and distributed remaining ARP ESSER funds to them.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I,
Jennifer M. Davis, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect
of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2015-1 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed
by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports,
the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment
of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been
disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the
following unaffiliated parties: Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas.



/s/ Jennifer M. DavisName: Jennifer M. Davis Title: Deputy Chief
Financial Officer Date: March 29, 2016
# Nation’s Report Card

- Statement from U.S. Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona on New Nation’s Report Card on History and Civics Education U.S. Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona issued the following statement on the latest Nation’s Report card showing a decline in history and civics scores for eighth graders:
- Secretary Cardona Announces Educators and a Parent Leader on Board to Oversee the Nation’s Report Card WASHINGTON—Today,  U.S. Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona announced the newest appointments to  the National Assessment Governing Board, which oversees the country’s only  ongoing, nationally representative assessment of student achievement. The  newest board members include a fourth-grade teacher, an eighth-grade teacher, a  high school principal, and a parent leader.
- ED Announces National Survey to Gather Critical Data on School Reopening To help safely reopen America's schools and promote educational equity, the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) at the U.S. Department of Education today announced the largest representative and highest-quality effort yet to gather vital data on the impact of COVID-19 on students and the status of in-person learning.
# C_2021462EN.01004601.xml

| 15.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 462/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 462/46

---

Action brought on 27 August 2021 — Neratax v EUIPO — Piraeus Bank and Others (ELLO ERMOL, Ello creamy, ELLO, MORFAT Creamy and MORFAT)

(Case T-528/21)

(2021/C 462/55)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Neratax LTD (Nicosia, Cyprus) (represented by: V. Katsavos, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Piraeus Bank SA (Athens, Greece), National Bank of Greece (Athens), Eurobank Ergasias SA (Athens)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade marks at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade marks at issue: European Union word marks ELLO, MORFAT and European Union figurative marks ELLO ERMOL, Ello Creamy, MORFAT Creamy — European Union trade marks Nos 12 549 499 (ELLO), 12 549 821 (MORFAT), 14 715 783 (ELLO ERMOL), 14 722 243 (Ello creamy), 14 715 726 (MORFAT Creamy)

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decisions: Decisions of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 June 2021 in Cases R 1295/2020-4, R 1296/2020-4, R 1298/2020-4, R 1299/2020-4, R 1302/2020-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | legally cancel, revoke and annul the contested decisions; |
| --- | --- |

—

legally cancel, revoke and annul the contested decisions;

| — | for the rightful ownership of the trademarks of the application to be upheld and recognized as the applicant’s intellectual property; |
| --- | --- |

—

for the rightful ownership of the trademarks of the application to be upheld and recognized as the applicant’s intellectual property;

| — | order the opposing parties to pay the costs incurred in the course of the present proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the opposing parties to pay the costs incurred in the course of the present proceedings.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Articles 101 to 106 TFEU; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Articles 101 to 106 TFEU;

| — | Infringement of Articles 19 to 29 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Articles 19 to 29 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of recital 7 and Article 17(3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of recital 7 and Article 17(3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.

---
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8705 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to authorize grants to institutions 

of higher education to develop programs and materials to educate students who have a substance use disorder on treatment options for such 

disorder, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 30, 2020 

Ms. DEAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to authorize grants 

to institutions of higher education to develop programs 

and materials to educate students who have a substance 

use disorder on treatment options for such disorder, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Education for New 

5 Dispositions on Stigma Act’’ or ‘‘END Stigma Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8705 IH

1 SEC. 2. GRANT PROGRAM TO EDUCATE STUDENTS ON SUB2 STANCE USE DISORDER TREATMENT OP3 TIONS. 

4 Part D of title V of the Public Health Service Act 

5 (42 U.S.C. 290dd et seq.) is amended by adding at the 

6 end the following: 

7 ‘‘SEC. 553. GRANT PROGRAM TO EDUCATE STUDENTS ON 

8 SUBSTANCE USE DISORDER TREATMENT OP9 TIONS. 

10 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary may award grants 

11 to institutions of higher education to develop programs 

12 and materials to— 

13 ‘‘(1) educate students who have a substance use 

14 disorder on treatment options for such disorder; 

15 ‘‘(2) reduce stigmas with respect to substance 

16 use disorders; and 

17 ‘‘(3) refer students to substance use disorder 

18 treatment providers and facilities. 

19 ‘‘(b) GRANT NUMBER.—An institution of higher edu20 cation may not receive more than 1 grant under this sec21 tion. 

22 ‘‘(c) GRANT PERIOD.—The period of a grant under 

23 this section shall be 3 years. 

24 ‘‘(d) GRANT AMOUNT.—The amount of a grant under 

25 this section shall not exceed $100,000. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 8705 IH

1 ‘‘(e) INSTITUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION DE2 FINED.—In this section, the term ‘institution of higher 

3 education’ has the meaning given that term in section 101 

4 of the Higher Education Act of 1965. 

5 ‘‘(f) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

6 is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section 

7 $5,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2021 through 2024.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

 v.

KEVIN FUQUA,

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 15-10278

D.C. No. 4:14-cr-00287-JD-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

James Donato, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 16, 2016** 

San Francisco, California

Before: HAWKINS, BERZON, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Kevin Fuqua (“Fuqua”) appeals his conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). 

We affirm. 

FILED

JAN 03 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
On appeal, Fuqua presents an argument for suppressing evidence in his case

that he did not raise before the district court. By not raising it below, Fuqua has

waived the argument. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 12(b)(3)(C). Fuqua has not shown why

he should be granted relief from his waiver. While intervening changes in law may

provide grounds for such relief, contrary to Fuqua’s argument, United States v. James,

810 F.3d 676 (9th Cir. 2016), does not represent an intervening change in pertinent

Fourth Amendment law. 

Even if Fuqua did not waive this argument, the police officers’ conduct here did

not violate the Fourth Amendment. Fuqua was not seized when officers knocked on

the window of the car he wassleeping in, woke him in the process, and asked to speak

with him. See United States v. Washington, 490 F.3d 765, 770 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.

2
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Abel HINOJOSA, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-40230 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed February 26, 2018

*357Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Abel Hinojosa, Pro Se

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Abel Hinojosa has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hinojosa has not fíled a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. *See United States v. Pesina-Rodriguez,*825 F.3d 787, 788 (5th Cir. 2016). Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<PAGE>   1
                    NATIONAL INSURANCE GROUP AND SUBSIDIARIES
EXHIBIT 11
                     COMPUTATION OF WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES
                       OUTSTANDING AND EARNINGS PER SHARE
                 (in thousands of dollars except share amounts)
                                   (unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                             First Quarter
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                        1997                1996
                                                        ----                ----
<S>                                                 <C>                <C>      
Actual common shares
outstanding                                         3,896,937          4,679,697

Common shares issuable
  under outstanding stock
  options                                              18,210             23,237

Weighted average common
  shares issued upon exercise
  of stock options                                         --                 --
                                                   ----------         ----------

Total weighted average
 shares outstanding                                 3,915,147          4,702,934
                                                   ==========         ==========

Net income                                         $      802         $      148
                                                   ==========         ==========

Net income per share                               $      .20         $      .03
                                                   ==========         ==========
</TABLE>



                                       13
Proposed Rule: Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gas Emissions 

Meeting Documentation: Semiconductor Industry Association (SIA) Date Staff Contact Information 

(Name, email, phone #) 

Name of Organization (Attach list of all attendees names and emails if possible) 

Summary of Discussion (e.g., applicability, 

reporting requirements, etc.)

WrittComProvDid tsubmDock

June 10, 2010 Kirsten Cappel 

(202) 343-9556 cappel.kirsten@epa.gov

• Outside participants identified below. • EPA Climate Change Division and EPA contractors: Kirsten Cappel, EPA; Scott Bartos, EPA; Deb Harris, ICF 

International; Shep Burton, ICF International. 

Participants presented information and conclusions from an uncertainty analysis conduced by ISMI. PowerPoint presentations provided at meetings are included in SIA comments on the proposed rule (Attachment B1) 

SIA comthe d

Outside Participants: Cynthia Johnson, TI, ckjohnson@TI.com. Tom Diamond, SIA, tdiamond@sia-online.org. Matthew Brewer, Latham and Watkins, matthew.brewer@lw.com On the telephone: Laura Mendicino, Freescale, laura.mendicino@freescale.com; Laurie Beu, Consultant to ISMIlaurie.beu@ismi.sematech.org ; Diane Michelson, ISMI, Di.Michelson@exchange.sematech.org; Steve Trammesteve.trammell@ismi.sematech.org; Dave Speed, IBM, speed@us.ibm.com; Jay Dietrich, IBM, jdietric@us.ibm.Intel, tim.g.higgs@intel.com; Tina Gilliland, TI. 

1
# C_2021462EN.01005002.xml

| 15.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 462/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 462/50

---

Action brought on 13 September 2021 — Tinnus Enterprises v EUIPO — Mystic Products and Koopman International (Fluid distribution equipment)

(Case T-576/21)

(2021/C 462/61)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Tinnus Enterprises LLC (Plano, Texas, United States) (represented by: T. Wuttke, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Mystic Products Import & Export, SL (Badalona, Spain), Koopman International BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the design at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Design at issue: Community design No 1 431 829-0006

Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 1 July 2021 in Case R 1005/2018-3

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | alter the contested decision to:






  — | allow the applicant’s appeal, |
| --- | --- | --- |

—

alter the contested decision to:

—

allow the applicant’s appeal,

| — | dismiss in its entirety the invalidity applicants’ applications to declare the contested design invalid, |
| --- | --- |

—

dismiss in its entirety the invalidity applicants’ applications to declare the contested design invalid,

| — | order the invalidity applicants to pay the applicant’s costs in front of the Board of Appeal and the Invalidity Division; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the invalidity applicants to pay the applicant’s costs in front of the Board of Appeal and the Invalidity Division;

| — | order the invalidity applicants to pay the applicant’s fees and costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the invalidity applicants to pay the applicant’s fees and costs.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of the principles set forth in the judgment of 24 March 2021, Lego v EUIPO — Delta Sport Handelskontor (Building block from a toy building set) (T-515/19, not published, EU:T:2021:155); |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of the principles set forth in the judgment of 24 March 2021, Lego v EUIPO — Delta Sport Handelskontor (Building block from a toy building set) (T-515/19, not published, EU:T:2021:155);

| — | Infringement of the principles set forth in the judgment of 8 March 2018, DOCERAM (C-395/16, EU:C:2018:172); |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of the principles set forth in the judgment of 8 March 2018, DOCERAM (C-395/16, EU:C:2018:172);

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002;

| — | Misinterpretation of patent application EP 3 005 948 A2 and the applicant’s multiple design application No. 1 431 829-0001-0010. |
| --- | --- |

—

Misinterpretation of patent application EP 3 005 948 A2 and the applicant’s multiple design application No. 1 431 829-0001-0010.

---
No. 11-8474.

#### Boyd *v.*Jackson, Warden.

C. A. 7th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
No. 11-10091.

#### Lumpkins *v.*Tucker, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
EXHIBIT
32





Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act























CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


OF
SECURITY FEDERAL CORPORATION


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), each
of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of Security
Federal Corporation (the “Company”) and in connection with the Company’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2008
that:








1.
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
  and





2.
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the Company’s financial condition and results of operations as
      of the dates and for the periods presented in the financial statements
      included in the Report.








/s/Timothy
      W. Simmons
            
            /s/Roy
      G. LindburgTimothy
      W. Simmons
            
            Roy
      G. LindburgChief
      Executive Officer
            
            Chief
      Financial Officer




Dated:
February 13, 2009