alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1
<CASH>                                              17,701
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    17,701
<PP&E>                                             219,882
<DEPRECIATION>                                       9,537
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     239,610
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                45
<OTHER-SE>                                          89,258
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       239,160
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    28,907
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       15,331
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   3,402
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     10,174
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 10,174
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        10,174
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         2.58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         2.58
                                                    

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 32d

        Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18
                            of the United States Code

      I, Robert E. Busch, Chief Financial Officer of Public Service Electric and
Gas Company, to the best of my knowledge, certify that (i) the Annual Report of
Public Service Electric and Gas Company on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of Public Service Electric and Gas Company.

                                    /s/ Robert E. Busch
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                    Robert E. Busch
                                    Public Service Electric and Gas Company
                                    Chief Financial Officer
                                    February 27, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                      13,664,394
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,500,362
<ALLOWANCES>                                   175,000
<INVENTORY>                                  2,850,422
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            30,953,269
<PP&E>                                      47,792,221
<DEPRECIATION>                              27,290,583
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              51,525,634
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,407,169
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        54,563
<OTHER-SE>                                  38,094,732
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                51,525,634
<SALES>                                     14,997,607
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,997,607
<CGS>                                       12,001,004
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,001,004
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                97,177
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,885,070
<INCOME-TAX>                                   603,222
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,281,848
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,281,848
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .23
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.1





 


GENCO SHIPPING & TRADING LIMITED


299 PARK AVENUE

12TH FLOOR

 NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10171


646-443-8550







March 26, 2014







Mr. John Wobensmith


Genco Shipping & Trading Limited


299 Park Avenue, 12th Floor


New York, New York 10171







Dear John:







The purpose of this letter is to confirm our understanding regarding an amendment to the agreement between you and Genco Shipping & Trading Limited ("Genco" or the "Company") dated September 21, 2007 (the "Agreement").  When fully executed, this letter shall constitute an amendment to the Agreement.  It is hereby agreed as follows:







1.            Section 7(a) of the Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the phrase "Oaktree Capital Management, LLC and its related entities or" from clause (i) of the definition of Change of Control and the phrase "Oaktree Capital Management, LLC or" from clause (ii) of such definition.


 


2.            Except as explicitly set forth herein, all terms and conditions contained in the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.


 


3.            This letter and the Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties on the subjects covered here and supersede all prior agreements, arrangements and understandings, whether written or oral, regarding the subjects covered here.  The Agreement may not be changed, or any of its provisions waived, orally, but only in writing signed by both parties.


 


	
 

	
Very truly yours,


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
GENCO SHIPPING & TRADING LIMITED


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
By:

	
/s/ Robert Gerald Buchanan


	
 

	
 

	
Robert Gerald Buchanan


	
 

	
 

	
President


	
ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO:

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
/s/ John Wobensmith

	
 

	
 


	
John Wobensmith

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
Date:  March 26, 2014
# C_2022011EN.01003602.xml

| 10.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 11/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 11/36

---

Action brought on 11 November 2021 — Rooken and Others v Parliament

(Case T-723/21)

(2022/C 11/50)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Robert Jan Rooken (Muiderberg, Netherlands) and eight other applicants (represented by: P. de Bandt, M. Gherghinaru and L. Panepinto, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the General Court should:

| — | order the annulment of the decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament of 27 October 2021 on exceptional health and safety rules governing access to the European Parliament buildings at its three places of work; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the annulment of the decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament of 27 October 2021 on exceptional health and safety rules governing access to the European Parliament buildings at its three places of work;

| — | order the defendant to pay all the costs, including those relating to the application for suspension of operation of the contested decision. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay all the costs, including those relating to the application for suspension of operation of the contested decision.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants rely on four pleas in law that are identical or similar to those relied upon in Case T-710/21, Roos and Others v Parliament.

---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 11 (Thursday, January 16, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 2310]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-55573]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 82


Protection of Stratospheric Ozone

CFR Correction

    In title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, parts 81 to 85, 
revised as of July 1, 1996, Sec. 82.32 (e)(1) and (2) was incorrectly 
revised. The corrected text should read as follows.


Sec. 82.32  Definitions.

* * * * *
    (e)(1) Properly using means using equipment in conformity with 
Recommended Service Procedures and Recommended Practices for the 
Containment of R-12 (CFC-12) set forth in appendix A or appendix B to 
this subpart, as applicable. In addition, this term includes operating 
the equipment in accordance with the manufacture's guide to operation 
and maintenance and using the equipment only for the controlled 
substance for which the machine is designed. For equipment that 
extracts and recycles refrigerant, properly using also means to recycle 
refrigerant before it is returned to a motor vehicle air conditioner. 
For equipment that only recovers refrigerant, properly using includes 
the requirement to recycle the refrigerant on-site or send the 
refrigerant off-site for reclamation.
    (2) Refrigerant from reclamation facilities that is used for the 
purpose of recharging motor vehicle air conditioners must be at or 
above the standard of purity developed by the Air-conditioning and 
Refrigeration Institute (ARI 700-93) (which is codified at 40 CFR part 
82, subpart F, appendix A, and is available at 4301 North Fairfax 
Drive, Suite 425, Arlington, Virginia 22203). Refrigerant may be 
recycled off-site only if the refrigerant is extracted using recover 
only equipment, and is subsequently recycled off-site by equipment 
owned by the person that owns both the recover only equipment and owns 
or operates the establishment at which the refrigerant was extracted. 
In any event, approved equipment must be used to extract refrigerant 
prior to performing any service during which discharge of refrigerant 
from the motor vehicle air conditioner can reasonably be expected. 
Intentionally venting or disposing of refrigerant to the atmosphere is 
an improper use of equipment.
* * * * *

[FR Doc. 97-55573 Filed 1-15-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

April 29, 2013

h0422

Order 

April 29, 2013

146276

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146276

COA: 310939

Monroe CC: 11-039043-FH

CRAIG DANIEL SZYMKOWIAK,

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 22, 2012 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration
Statement on Form S-8 of our report dated April 17, 2002, except as to Note 10
for which the date is September 30, 2002, relating to the combined financial
statements of the Upstream Subsidiaries of Plains Resources Inc., which appear
in Amendment No. 3 to Plains Exploration & Production Company's information
statement on Form 10 (File No. 001-31470) filed on December 6, 2002.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
-----------------------------------
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Houston, Texas
January 21, 2003



                                       10
# C_2021217EN.01006101.xml

| 7.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/61 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/61

---

Action brought on 29 March 2021 — JS v EDPS

(Case T-200/21)

(2021/C 217/77)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: JS (represented by: L. Levi and A. Champetier, lawyers)

Defendant: European Data Protection Supervisor

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the EDPS dated 18 January 2021 rejecting the complaint of the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the EDPS dated 18 January 2021 rejecting the complaint of the applicant;

| — | annul also, and so far as necessary, the decision of the EDPS dated 9 March 2021 rejecting the request for review of that initial decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul also, and so far as necessary, the decision of the EDPS dated 9 March 2021 rejecting the request for review of that initial decision;

| — | order compensation for the prejudice suffered; |
| --- | --- |

—

order compensation for the prejudice suffered;

| — | order the defendant to pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay all the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea, alleging breaches of Articles 4(1), 5, 19, 20 and 23 of Regulation No 2018/1725, (1) of the principles of necessity and proportionality, and of Articles 8 and 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU.

---

(1)  Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2018 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 and Decision No 1247/2002/EC (OJ 2018 L 295, p. 39).

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> BD
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           88060
<RECEIVABLES>                                   265615
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                  0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                             6321
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                              10496
<PP&E>                                            3166
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  373658
<SHORT-TERM>                                        84
<PAYABLES>                                      341066
<REPOS-SOLD>                                         0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                              12437
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                                  77
<LONG-TERM>                                       6421
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                       2000
<COMMON>                                            88
<OTHER-SE>                                       11485
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    373658
<TRADING-REVENUE>                                 1364
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                              4404
<COMMISSIONS>                                     5130
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                        0
<FEE-REVENUE>                                       70
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                2716
<COMPENSATION>                                    4487
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   2105
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        2105
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1264
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 46 (Monday, March 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 10876]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5866]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Notice of the Intention To Issue a Concession Contract at 
Callville Bay, Lake Mead National Recreation Area

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Act of October 9, 1965 (79 Stat. 969; 16 
U.S.C. 20 et seq.), notice is hereby given that the National Park 
Service intends to issue a concession contract at Lake Mead National 
Recreation Area for a period of two years. This short contract is 
necessary to allow the continuation of public services during the 
completion period of the planning documents for the Callville Bay 
location in the park. The current concessioner has performed its 
obligation to the satisfaction of the Secretary and retains its right 
of preference under this administrative action.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The concession contract at Lake Mead 
National Recreation Area expired on December 31, 1996. The National 
Park Service will not renew this contract for an extended period until 
planning can be completed to determine the future direction for 
concession services at the Callville Bay location within Lake Mead 
National Recreation Area. This necessary planning process has begun and 
will have a direct affect on future concession activities. It is 
anticipated that this planning process will conclude within the next 
several months. Until that planning process is completed, it will not 
be in the best interest of Lake Mead National Recreation Area to enter 
into a long term concession contract. For these reasons, it is the 
intention of the National Park Service to issue a short term contract 
at this time, complete the planning process and then to conduct a 
public contracting process for selection of a concessioner for an 
extended period.
    Information regarding this notice can be sought from Mr. Mac 
Foreman, Office of Concession Program Management, Pacific Great Basin 
System Support Office, 600 Harrison Street, Suite 145, San Francisco, 
California 94107-1372, or by calling (415) 744-3981.

    Dated: January 29, 1997.
Stephen G. Crabtree,
Acting Field Director, Pacific West Area.
[FR Doc. 97-5866 Filed 3-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 14 (Friday, January 21, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 3931]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-1258]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7306]

In the Matter of the Designation of Qari Hussain Also Known as 
Qari Hussain Mehsud Also Known as Qari Hussain Ahmad Mehsud Also Known 
as Ustad-e-Fidayeen and Other Aliases as a Specially Designated Global 
Terrorist Pursuant to Section 1(b) of Executive Order 13224, as Amended

    Acting under the authority of and in accordance with section 1(b) 
of Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 2001, as amended by Executive 
Order 13268 of July 2, 2002, and Executive Order 13284 of January 23, 
2003, I hereby determine that the individual known as Qari Hussain, 
also known as Qari Hussain Mehsud, also known as Qari Hussain Ahmad 
Mehsud, also known as Ustad-e-Fidayeen poses a significant risk of 
committing, acts of terrorism that threaten the security of U.S. 
nationals or the national security, foreign policy, or economy of the 
United States.
    Consistent with the determination in section 10 of Executive Order 
13224 that ``prior notice to persons determined to be subject to the 
Order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States 
would render ineffectual the blocking and other measures authorized in 
the Order because of the ability to transfer funds instantaneously,'' I 
determine that no prior notice needs to be provided to any person 
subject to this determination who might have a constitutional presence 
in the United States, because to do so would render ineffectual the 
measures authorized in the Order.
    This notice shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: January 4, 2011.
Hillary Rodham Clinton,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2011-1258 Filed 1-20-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```
Petitions for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Majority and 

Dissenting Opinions filed April 28, 2020.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-19-00845-CV

NO. 14-19-00847-CV

IN RE FACEBOOK, INC. AND FACEBOOK, INC. D/B/A INSTAGRAM, 

Relators

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

334th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 2018-69816, 2018-82214

NO. 14-19-00886-CV

IN RE FACEBOOK INC. D/B/A INSTAGRAM, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

151st District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2019-16262
2

MEMORANDUM MAJORITY OPINION

Each plaintiff in the underlying cases is a minor who connected on Facebook

or Instagram (collectively, “Facebook”) with individuals who forced them into 

human trafficking. The plaintiffs seek to hold Facebook liable for damages resulting 

from being victimized by trafficking. Facebook filed a Rule 91a1 motion to dismiss 

each plaintiff’s case against Facebook based on an immunity provision under a 

Federal statute known as the Communications Decency Act. See 47 U.S.C. § 230.

Facebook filed two petitions for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. 

Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the first petition filed in 

our case numbers 14-19-00845-CV and 14-19-00847-CV, Facebook asks this court

to compel the Honorable Steven Kirkland, presiding judge of the 334th District 

Court of Harris County, to set aside his May 23, 2019 orders denying Facebook’s 

Rule 91a motions to dismiss. 

In the second petition filed in our case number 14-19-00886-CV, Facebook

asks this court to compel the Honorable Mike Engelhart, presiding judge of the 151st

District Court of Harris County, to set aside his October 4, 2019 order denying 

Facebook’s Rule 91a motion to dismiss. 

Facebook has not established that it is entitled to mandamus relief. 

Accordingly, we deny Facebook’s petitions for writ of mandamus. We also lift our 

stays issued on November 14, 2019, and November 19, 2019.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Spain, and Poissant. (Christopher, J., 

dissenting).

1

See Tex. R. Civ. P. 91a.