alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2022011EN.01002901.xml

| 10.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 11/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 11/29

---

Action brought on 5 November 2021 — Gusachenka v Council

(Case T-579/21)

(2022/C 11/39)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Siarhei Gusachenka (Minsk, Belarus) (represented by: D. Litvinski, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/997 of 21 June 2021 implementing Article 8a(1) of Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in respect of Belarus, (1) in so far as it concerns the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/997 of 21 June 2021 implementing Article 8a(1) of Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in respect of Belarus, (1) in so far as it concerns the applicant;

| — | annul Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2021/1002 of 21 June 2021 implementing Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus, (2) in so far as it concerns the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2021/1002 of 21 June 2021 implementing Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus, (2) in so far as it concerns the applicant;

| — | order the Council to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law which are, in essence, identical or similar to those raised in Case T-556/21, Lyubetskaya v Council.

---

(1)  OJ 2021 L 219I, p. 3.

(2)  OJ 2021 L 219I, p. 70.

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6847

ROGER GENE POWERS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

COLIE L. RUSHTON, Warden; CHARLES M. CONDON,

Attorney General of the State of South

Carolina,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge.

(CA-99-3128-3-24BC)

Submitted: November 30, 2000 Decided: December 27, 2000

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roger Gene Powers, Appellant Pro Se. Jeffrey Alan Jacobs, OFFICE

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* In the absence of a separate motion for certificate of appealability, Powers’ notice of appeal is construed as a motion for

a certificate of appealability in this court. Fed. R. App. P.

22(b).

2

PER CURIAM:

Roger Gene Powers seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Powers v. Rushton, No. CA-99-

3128-3-24BC (D.S.C. May 31, 2000). We further deny Appellee’s

motion to dismiss the appeal* and Powers’ motion to stay pending

request for a certificate of appealability. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 62 (Thursday, March 31, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 18797]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-06812]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (Act) (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
applications are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 
1817(j)(7)).
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in paragraph 7 of the Act.
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than April 15, 2022.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant 
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. Elizabeth Bosshard-Blackey 2022 Irrevocable Bank Trust, u/a/d 
January 7, 2022, Andrew R. Bosshard, as trustee, both of La Crosse, 
Wisconsin; and Piercarlo Valdesolo, South Pasadena, California; to 
become members of the Bosshard Family Control Group, a group acting in 
concert, to acquire voting shares of Bosshard Financial Group, Inc., La 
Crosse, Wisconsin, and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of One 
Community Bank, Oregon, Wisconsin, and Farmers State Bank-Hillsboro, 
Hillsboro, Wisconsin.
    2. The MCM BAA Investment Trust, Kristine M.P. Martin and Tye J. 
Klooster, as co-trustees, William Seth Martin, as business advisor and 
trust protector, and the WSM BAA Family Trust, Michael Carl Martin, as 
trustee, all of Ann Arbor, Michigan; to become members of the Martin 
Family Control Group, a group acting in concert, to acquire voting 
shares of Arbor Bancorp, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire voting 
shares of Bank of Ann Arbor, both of Ann Arbor, Michigan.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 28, 
2022.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2022-06812 Filed 3-30-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 858 

To make continuing appropriations for salaries and expenses of air traffic 

controllers for fiscal year 2019. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 29, 2019 

Mr. YOUNG introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Appropriations 

A BILL 

To make continuing appropriations for salaries and expenses 

of air traffic controllers for fiscal year 2019. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE FED4 ERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION. 

5 If interim or full-year appropriations are not in effect 

6 for the Federal Aviation Administration during any period 

7 in fiscal year 2019, there is hereby appropriated for that 

8 period, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise 

9 appropriated, such sums as may be necessary (as deter10 mined by the Secretary of Transportation), at the rate for 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 858 IH

1 operations as provided in the Transportation, Housing 

2 and Urban Development, and Related Agencies Appro3 priations Act, 2018 (division L of Public Law 115–141) 

4 and under the authority and conditions provided in such 

5 Act, for paying the salaries and expenses of any air traffic 

6 controller that were conducted in fiscal year 2018 and for 

7 which appropriations, funds, or other authority were made 

8 available under any account relating to the Federal Avia9 tion Administration. 

10 SEC. 2. TERMINATION. 

11 Appropriations and funds made available and author12 ity granted pursuant to this Act shall be available until 

13 the earliest of the following: 

14 (1) the enactment into law of an appropriation 

15 (including a continuing appropriation) for any pur16 pose for which amounts are made available in sec17 tion 1; 

18 (2) the enactment into law of the applicable 

19 regular or continuing appropriations resolution or 

20 other Act without any appropriation for such pur21 pose; or 

22 (3) September 30, 2019. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
U.S. Election Assistance Commission Public Meeting

Agenda

Wednesday, February 8, 2023

1 p.m. EST

Call To Order – Chairman Thomas Hicks

• Roll Call

Adoption of the Agenda – Chairman Thomas Hicks

Adoption Of Minutes from the November 15, 2022 Public Meeting

Introduction of New EAC Executive Director – Chairman Thomas Hicks and Steven Frid

Opening Remarks – EAC Commissioners

Election Office Innovations in Poll Worker Recruitment Roundtable Discussion

• Caryn Scheel, Youth Engagement Coordinator, Minneapolis Elections & Voter Services

• David Stafford, Supervisor of Elections, Escambia County, FL

• Dianna Moorman, Director of Elections and General Registrar, James City County, VA 

• Greg Clark, Director of Community Outreach & Events, Duval County Supervisor of 

Elections Office

External Recruitment Efforts for Poll Workers

• Ingrid Sundlee, Director of Civic Engagement, We the Veterans Foundation

• Leslie Reynolds, Executive Director of the National Association of Secretaries of State

• Rachael V. Cobb, Ph.D., Associate Professor and Chair, Political Science & Legal 

Studies, Suffolk University

Closing Remarks and Adjournment – Chairman Thomas Hicks
*This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. The court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

AUG 13 1998

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

ROBERT RICHARDSON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

BAKERY, CONFECTIONARY &

TOBACCO WORKERS LOCAL NO.

26; SUSAN J. ECKERT, Union

Attorney; WALTER C. BRAUER, III;

WAYNE BREWER, Union President, 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 98-1070

(D.C. No. 97-S-2503)

(Colorado)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before SEYMOUR, Chief Judge, BRORBY and BRISCOE, Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of

this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is

therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
-2-

Plaintiff Robert Richardson filed a pro se complaint contending that

defendants and the district court violated his rights in a prior civil action in which

the court granted summary judgment for these same defendants. The nature of the

prior action and its procedural history are set out in the order of the district court

granting defendants’ motion to dismiss the present action for failure to state a

claim. Mr. Richardson appeals.

We construe liberally the pleadings of pro se litigants. See Hall v. Bellmon,

935 F.2d 1106, 1110 (10th Cir. 1991). “We review de novo a district court’s

dismissal of a cause of action for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be

granted.” Chemical Weapons Working Group, Inc. (CWWG) v. United States

Dep’t of the Army, 111 F.3d 1485, 1490 (10th Cir. 1997). 

Mr. Richardson complains on appeal that the district court erred when it

denied his motion to amend. Contrary to Mr. Richardson’s assertion, the district

court considered the complaint as amended to include a claim under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1746 as Mr. Richardson requested. The district court then correctly determined

that section 1746 is not applicable to a civil case and dismissed the amended

complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. 

Mr. Richardson further contends defendants violated his rights under 42

U.S.C. § 1983 by committing perjury. Defendants are not subject to liability

under section 1983 because they are not state actors and have no authority to act
-3-

under color of state law.

After a thorough review of the record and Mr. Richardson’s contentions, we

AFFIRM for substantially the reasons stated by the district court in its order

dated February 2, 1998, granting the motion to dismiss.

The judgment of the United States District Court for the District of

Colorado is AFFIRMED.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Stephanie K. Seymour

Chief Judge
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2
 
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
  We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" and to
the use and the incorporation by reference from J. Ray McDermott, S.A.'s Annual
Report (Form 10-K), as amended, for the fiscal year ended March 31, 1995, of
our report dated April 28, 1995, with respect to the combined financial
statements of McDermott-ETPM West, Inc. and Heerema Offshore Construction Group
Inc.--McDermott International, Inc. Joint Venture included and incorporated by
reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-3) and related Prospectus of J.
Ray McDermott, S.A. for the registration of $250,000,000 principal amount of
its Senior Subordinated Notes due 2006.
 
                                          KPMG ACCOUNTANTS N.V.
 
The Hague
March 19, 1996
Submitted December 21, 2016;

portion of judgment requiring defendant to pay attorney fees reversed, otherwise affirmed January 25, 2017

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Plaintiff-Respondent, v.*JOEL ADAM LEA, *Defendant-Appellant.*

Coos County Circuit Court

14CR2328, 15CR0215; A159424 (Control), A159425

388 P3d 1252

Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Sarah De La Cruz, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant.

Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Inge D. Wells, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Ortega, Presiding Judge, and Egan, Judge, and Lagesen, Judge.

*485PER CURIAM

In this consolidated criminal appeal, defendant seeks reversal of his reckless driving conviction and the imposition of $240 in court-appointed attorney fees.1 We reject without written discussion his challenge to the reckless driving conviction and write only to address defendant’s contention that the trial court plainly erred when it ordered him to pay the attorney fees when the record was silent as to whether he “is or may be able to pay” the costs of his defense. *See*ORS 151.505(3) (“The court may not require a person to pay costs under this section unless the person is or may be able to pay the costs.”); ORS 161.665(4) (“The court may not sentence a defendant to pay costs under this section unless the defendant is or may be able to pay them.”). Defendant did not preserve his claim of error but asks us to review and correct the error as plain error. ORAP 5.45(1); *Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.,*312 Or 376, 382, 823 P2d 956 (1991). The state concedes that the trial court plainly erred by imposing attorney fees when the record was silent as to defendant’s ability to pay.

We accept the state’s concession that the trial court plainly erred in imposing attorney fees of $240 on this record. *See State v. Coverstone,*260 Or App 714, 716, 320 P3d 670 (2014) (it is plain error for a trial court to impose court-appointed attorney fees where the record is silent as to the defendant’s ability to pay them). Because the amount is substantial in light of defendant’s family obligations and circumstances, the error is sufficiently grave to warrant the exercise of our discretion to correct it. *See State v. Ramirez-Hernandez,*264 Or App 346, 349, 332 P3d 338 (2014) (exercising discretion because $400 was a substantial amount to pay for the defendant in his circumstances).

Portion of judgment requiring defendant to pay attorney fees reversed; otherwise affirmed.

1

 Defendant was convicted of reckless driving, ORS 811.140, in Case Number 14CR2328 and failure to appear, ORS 162.195, in Case Number 15CR0215.
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

 

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

**New Holland Credit Company, LLC**

 

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of New Holland Credit Company, LLC (“NHCC”), as Servicer pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of February 1, 2015 (as amended from time to time, the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”) by and among NHCC, CNH Capital Receivables LLC and CNH Equipment Trust 2015-A, does hereby certify that:

 

1.                                      NHCC is Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement.

 

2.                                      The undersigned is duly authorized as required pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate to the Indenture Trustee.

 

3.                                      This Certificate is delivered pursuant to Section 4.9(a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement and Item 1123 of Regulation AB.

 

4.                                      A review of the Servicer’s activities during the 12 month period ending (and including) December 31, 2017 and of its performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.

 

5.                                      To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the 12 month period ending (and including) December 31, 2017.

 

6.                                      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 27th day of March, 2018.

 

----

 
| March 27, 2018 |   |               |
|---------------------|--------|--------------------|
|                | By:    | /s/ Brett D. Davis |
|                | Name:  | Brett D. Davis     |
|                | Title: | President          |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           3,420
<SECURITIES>                                    40,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,451,439
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 13,570,293
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            19,863,527
<PP&E>                                       8,222,905
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              32,405,035
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       16,915,852
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        130
<COMMON>                                       228,459
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,193,148
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                32,405,035
<SALES>                                      8,000,371
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,208,011
<CGS>                                        6,500,526
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,961,734
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             320,616
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (74,339)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (74,339)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (74,339)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00
        

</TABLE>
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8611 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

4755 Southeast Dixie Highway in Port Salerno, Florida, as the ‘‘Joseph 

Bullock Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 16, 2020 

Mr. MAST (for himself, Mr. RUTHERFORD, Mr. YOHO, Mr. SOTO, Mr. DUNN, 

Mrs. DEMINGS, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr. WEBSTER of Florida, Mr. DIAZBALART, Ms. SHALALA, Mr. WALTZ, Mrs. MURPHY of Florida, Mr. 

POSEY, Mr. SPANO, Ms. CASTOR of Florida, Mr. BUCHANAN, Mr. GAETZ, 

Mr. STEUBE, Ms. WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, Mr. HASTINGS, Ms. FRANKEL, 

Mr. CRIST, Mr. LAWSON of Florida, Ms. MUCARSEL-POWELL, Mr. ROONEY of Florida, Mr. DEUTCH, and Ms. WILSON of Florida) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 

Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 4755 Southeast Dixie Highway in Port 

Salerno, Florida, as the ‘‘Joseph Bullock Post Office 

Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. JOSEPH BULLOCK POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 4755 Southeast Dixie Highway 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8611 IH

1 in Port Salerno, Florida, shall be known and designated 

2 as the ‘‘Joseph Bullock Post Office Building’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Joseph Bullock Post 

7 Office Building’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
#### COM. v. PETERSON, G., II

2080 MDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/21/2017

CP-67-CR-0005763-2014, CP-67-CR-0008774-2013, CP-67-CR-0008776-2013 (York)

Affirmed — Application to Withdraw as Counsel Granted