alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 44 (Thursday, March 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 10293]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5509]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION


Information Security Oversight Office; National Industrial 
Security Program Policy Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. 
App.2) and implementing regulation 41 CFR 101-6, announcement is made 
of the following committee meeting:

    Name of Committee: National Industrial Security Program Policy 
Advisory Committee (NISPPAC).
    Date of Meeting: March 25, 1997.
    Time of Meeting: 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon.
    Place of Meeting: National Archives and Records Administration, 
700 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC.
    Purpose: To discuss National Industrial Security Program policy 
matters.
    This meeting will be open to the public. However, due to space 
limitations and access procedures, the names and telephone numbers 
of individuals planning to attend must be submitted to the 
Information Security Oversight Office (ISOO) no later than March 20, 
1997.
    For Further Information Contact: Steven Garfinkel, Director, 
ISOO, National Archives Building, 700 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Room 
100, Washington, DC 20408, telephone (202) 219-5250.

    Dated: February 28, 1997.
Mary Ann Hadyka,
Policy and Communications Staff.
[FR Doc. 97-5509 Filed 3-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7515-01-P
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 75 (Thursday, April 18, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 23149]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-09263]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 98

Mandatory Greenhouse Gas Reporting

CFR Correction

    In Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 96 to 99, 
revised as of July 1, 2012, on page 768, in Sec.  98.226, in paragraph 
(n) introductory text, the last sentence is removed.

[FR Doc. 2013-09263 Filed 4-17-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE: APPOINTMENT TO DOMESTIC

RELATIONS PROCEDURAL RULES 

COMMITTEE

:

:

:

:

:

No. 615

CIVIL PROCEDURAL RULES

 O R D E R

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 17th day of February, 2015, Lucille Marsh, Esquire, 

Lackawanna County, is hereby appointed as a member of the Domestic Relations 

Procedural Rules Committee for a term of three years commencing March 1, 2015.
#### Dorarena BOYD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Arenda Wright ALLEN, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 17-2254

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: February 20, 2018

Decided: March 8, 2018

Dorarena Boyd, Appellant Pro Se.

Before MOTZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Dorarena Boyd seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing her complaint without prejudice for failure to state a claim. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); *Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,*337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Boyd seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interiocutoi-y or collateral order. *See Goode v. Central Va. Legal Aid,*807 F.3d 619 (4th Cir. 2015). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense *259with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
#### COM. v. POWELL, R.

656 WDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/28/2017

CP-02-CR-0004937-2015 (Allegheny)

Affirmed
No. 11-10249.

#### Stokley *v.*Ryan, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-10542.

#### Mangino *v.*Cameron, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Cresson, et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 110 (Monday, June 9, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 31367]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5555]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

49 CFR Part 571


Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards

CFR Correction

    In title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations, parts 400 to 999, 
revised as of October 1, 1996, in Sec. 571.108 in paragraph S8.9 the 
last sentence should be removed and the following sentence reinstated 
and in paragraph S9 the last sentence should be revised. The reinstated 
and revised text should read as follows:


Sec. 571.108  Standard No. 108; Lamps, reflective devices, and 
associated equipment.

* * * * *
    S8.9  Sealing. * * * If any water occurs on the interior or air 
escapes, the lamp is not a sealed lamp.
* * * * *
    S9  Deflection test for replaceable light source. * * * Distance 
`A' for a replaceable light source other than an HB Type shall be the 
dimension provided in accordance with Appendix A of part 564 of this 
chapter, section I.A.1 if the light source has a lower beam filament, 
or as specified in section I.B.1 if the light source has only an upper 
beam filament.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 97-5555 Filed 6-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-M
# C_2023235EN.01000402.xml

| 3.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 235/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 235/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 17 May 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad — Bulgaria) — Criminal proceedings against BK, ZhP

(Case C-176/22, (1) BK and ZhP (Partial stay of the main proceedings))

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union - Article 23, first paragraph - Stay of the main proceedings by a national court which has submitted a request for a preliminary ruling to the Court of Justice under Article 267 TFEU - Possibility of a partial stay of proceedings)

(2023/C 235/05)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad

Parties in the main proceedings

BK, ZhP

intervening parties: Spetsializirana prokuratura

Operative part of the judgment

Article 23 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union must be interpreted as not precluding a national court which has made a request for a preliminary ruling under Article 267 TFEU from staying the main proceedings only with regard to the aspects of those proceedings that are likely to be affected by the Court’s response to that request.

---

(1)  OJ C 191, 10.5.2022.

---
# C_2022276EN.01000701.xml

| 18.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 276/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 276/7

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from High Court (Ireland) made on 3 May 2022 — NN v An Bord Pleanála, Ireland and the Attorney General

(Case C-301/22)

(2022/C 276/10)

Language of the case: English

Referring court

High Court (Ireland)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: NN

Respondents: An Bord Pleanála, Ireland and the Attorney General

Notice parties: Bradán Beo Teoranta and Galway County Council

Questions referred

| 1. | (a) | Are member states required to characterise and subsequently classify all water bodies, irrespective of size, and in particular is there a requirement to characterise and classify all lakes with a topological surface area below 0,5 km2? |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.

(a)

Are member states required to characterise and subsequently classify all water bodies, irrespective of size, and in particular is there a requirement to characterise and classify all lakes with a topological surface area below 0,5 km2?

| (b) | To what extent is the position different with respect to water bodies in a protected area, if at all? |
| --- | --- |

(b)

To what extent is the position different with respect to water bodies in a protected area, if at all?

| 2. | If the answer to question 1(a) is yes, can a competent authority for the purposes of development consent grant development consent for a project that may affect the water body prior to it being categorised and classified? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If the answer to question 1(a) is yes, can a competent authority for the purposes of development consent grant development consent for a project that may affect the water body prior to it being categorised and classified?

| 3. | If the answer to question 1(a) is no, what are the obligations on a competent authority when deciding upon an application for development consent that potentially affects a water body not characterised and/or classified? |
| --- | --- |

3.

If the answer to question 1(a) is no, what are the obligations on a competent authority when deciding upon an application for development consent that potentially affects a water body not characterised and/or classified?

---
Presidential Documents

10409

Federal Register

Vol. 62, No. 44

Thursday, March 6, 1997

Title 3—

The President

Notice of March 5, 1997

Continuation of Iran Emergency

On March 15, 1995, by Executive Order 12957, I declared a national emergency with respect to Iran pursuant to the International Emergency Economic

Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–1706) to deal with the threat to the national

security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States constituted by

the actions and policies of the Government of Iran, including its support

for international terrorism, efforts to undermine the Middle East peace process, and acquisition of weapons of mass destruction and the means to

deliver them. On May 6, 1995, I issued Executive Order 12959 imposing

more comprehensive sanctions to further respond to this threat.

Because the actions and policies of the Government of Iran continue to

threaten the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United

States, the national emergency declared on March 15, 1995, must continue

in effect beyond March 15, 1997. Therefore, in accordance with section

202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing

the national emergency with respect to Iran. Because the emergency declared

by Executive Order 12957 constitutes an emergency separate from that declared on November 14, 1979, by Executive Order 12170, this renewal is

distinct from the emergency renewal of October 1996. This notice shall

be published in the Federal Register 

œ–

and transmitted to the Congress.

THE WHITE HOUSE,

March 5, 1997.

[FR Doc. 97–5817

Filed 3–5–97; 11:46 am]

Billing code 3195–01–P
# C_2023338EN.01002301.xml

| 25.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 338/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 338/23

---

Judgment of the General Court of 26 July 2023 — Mood Media Netherlands v EUIPO — Tailoradio (VIDEO MOOD Digital Signage, made easy)

(Case T-664/22) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark VIDEO MOOD Digital Signage, made easy - Earlier EU figurative mark MOOD:MIX - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

(2023/C 338/30)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Mood Media Netherlands BV (Naarden, Netherlands) (represented by: A. M. Pecoraro, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Frydendahl, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Tailoradio Srl (Milan, Italy) (represented by A. Sobol and S. Bernardini, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 23 August 2022 (Case R 1852/2018-5).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mood Media Netherlands BV to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by Tailoradio Srl in the proceedings before the General Court; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mood Media Netherlands BV to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by Tailoradio Srl in the proceedings before the General Court;

| 3. | Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  
  OJ C 7, 9.1.2023.

---
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8327 

To provide for the dissemination to farm and agricultural workers of information and training on best practices used to respond to the COVID– 

19 pandemic, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 21, 2020 

Mr. HAGEDORN (for himself and Mr. CUELLAR) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To provide for the dissemination to farm and agricultural 

workers of information and training on best practices 

used to respond to the COVID–19 pandemic, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Farm and Agricultural 

5 Worker Safety Education Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8327 IH

1 SEC. 2. DISSEMINATION TO FARM AND AGRICULTURAL 

2 WORKERS OF INFORMATION AND TRAINING 

3 ON BEST PRACTICES USED TO RESPOND TO 

4 THE COVID–19 PANDEMIC. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 502(i)(1)(B) of the Rural 

6 Development Act of 1972 (7 U.S.C. 2662(i)(1)(B)) is 

7 amended— 

8 (1) in the subparagraph heading, by inserting 

9 ‘‘AND AGRICULTURAL WORKER’’ before ‘‘SAFETY’’; 

10 (2) in the matter preceding clause (i)— 

11 (A) by inserting ‘‘and agricultural worker’’ 

12 before ‘‘safety education’’; and 

13 (B) by striking ‘‘timber harvesters, and 

14 farm families’’ and inserting ‘‘agricultural proc15 essors and handlers, timber harvesters, farm 

16 families, and other participants in the agricul17 tural supply chain’’; 

18 (3) in clause (iii), by striking ‘‘dermititis’’ and 

19 inserting ‘‘dermatitis’’; 

20 (4) in clause (v), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

21 (5) in clause (vi), by striking the period and in22 serting ‘‘; and’’; and 

23 (6) by adding at the end the following: 

24 ‘‘(vii) other relevant health and safety 

25 guidance, guidelines, requirements, or in26 formation.’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 8327 IH

1 (b) LIMITATIONS ON AUTHORIZATION OF APPRO2 PRIATIONS.—For the purpose of disseminating informa3 tion related to the COVID–19 pandemic under section 

4 502(i)(1)(B) of the Rural Development Act of 1972, there 

5 are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of Agri6 culture $50,000,000 for fiscal year 2021, which is author7 ized to remain available through fiscal year 2026. 

8 SEC. 3. RURAL HEALTH DISRUPTION PRIORITIZATION 

9 FLEXIBILITY. 

10 Section 6101(a) of the Agricultural Act of 2018 (132 

11 Stat. 4726–4727; Public Law 115–334) is amended by 

12 striking paragraph (2) and redesignating paragraph (3) 

13 as paragraph (2). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
# C_2023094EN.01002101.xml

| 13.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/21

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresní soud Praha-západ (Czech Republic) lodged on 13 December 2022 — Nárokuj s.r.o. v EC Financial Services, a.s.

(Case C-755/22, Nárokuj)

(2023/C 94/23)

Language of the case: Czech

Referring court

Okresní soud Praha-západ

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Nárokuj s.r.o.

Defendant: EC Financial Services, a.s.

Question referred

Is the purpose of Directive 2008/48/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 on credit agreements for consumers and repealing Council Directive 87/102/EEC to penalise credit providers for a failure to fully examine a consumer’s creditworthiness, even in cases when the consumer fully paid up the credit and raised no objections against the agreement while paying?

---

(1)  OJ 2008 L 133, p. 66.

---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 7 (Friday, January 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 1444]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-544]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-222-000]


ANR Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas 
Tariff

January 6, 1997.
    Take notice that on December 31, 1996, ANR Pipeline Company (ANR), 
tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised 
Volume No. 1, the tariff sheets listed in Attachment A to the filing, 
to be effective February 1, 1997.
    ANR states that the referenced tariff sheets are being submitted as 
part of ANR's Eighth Annual Reconciliation of Order Nos. 500/528 buyout 
buydown costs being recovered by means of Volumetric Buyout Buydown 
Surcharges contained in Docket Nos. RP91-33, et al., RP91-192, RP92-4, 
RP92-199, RP93-29, RP93-149, RP96-10, and RP96-328, and Fixed Monthly 
Charges associated with Docket Nos. RP96-10, and RP96-328.
    With respect to the Volumetric Buyout Buydown Surcharges, the 
proposed charges are designed to recover $3.2 million less on an annual 
basis than the currently effective volumetric surcharge. This decrease 
is due to lower interest on decreasing principal. With respect to Fixed 
Monthly Charges, the proposed charges are designed to recover $32,868 
less on a monthly basis than the currently effective Fixed Monthly 
Charges.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion 
to intervene. Copies of this application are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-544 Filed 1-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 21
                                                                     ----------

                               PGI INCORPORATED
                               ----------------
                                 SUBSIDIARIES
                                 ------------

                                         State of          Relationship
                                         --------          ------------
                                         Incorporation
                                         -------------

Sugarmill Woods, Inc.                    Florida           Wholly owned (1)
Burnt Store Marina, Inc.                 Florida           Wholly owned (1)
Punta Gorda Isles Sales, Inc.            Florida           Wholly owned (1)
Burnt Store Utilities, Inc.              Florida           Wholly owned (1)
Gulf Coast Credit Corporation            Florida           Wholly owned (1)

<FN>
---------------------------------------
(1) Included in the Company's consolidated financial statements.
# C_2022084EN.01004401.xml

| 21.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 84/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 84/44

---

Action brought on 21 December 2021 — ClientEarth v Commission

(Case T-792/21)

(2022/C 84/62)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: ClientEarth AISBL (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: F. Logue, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the implied decision of the European Commission dated 12 October 2021 in case GESTDEM No 2021/4394 refusing the applicant’s request for access to documents; (1) |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the implied decision of the European Commission dated 12 October 2021 in case GESTDEM No 2021/4394 refusing the applicant’s request for access to documents; (1)

| — | order the Commission to pay the applicant’s costs pursuant to Articles 133 and 134 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court, including the costs of any intervening parties. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the applicant’s costs pursuant to Articles 133 and 134 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court, including the costs of any intervening parties.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law, alleging that the Commission failed to state reasons in breach of Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) 1049/2001, (2) Article 41(2)(c), of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and Article 296, paragraph 2, TFEU.

---

(1)  Editorial note: the documents in question concern the EU’s legislative initiative regarding sustainable corporate governance.

(2)  Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43).

---