alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8992 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8992

   To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to provide for certain 
              succession reforms, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 16, 2020

Miss Rice of New York introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                 to the Committee on Homeland Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to provide for certain 
              succession reforms, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUCCESSION REFORMS.

    Subsection (g) of section 103 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 
(6 U.S.C. 113) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``neither the Secretary 
        nor Deputy Secretary is'' and inserting ``the Secretary, Deputy 
        Secretary, and Associate Secretary are not''; and
            (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ``designate such other 
        officers of the Department in further order of succession to 
        serve as Acting Secretary.'' and inserting ``designate--
                    ``(A) such other official of the Department in 
                further order of succession to serve as Acting 
                Secretary in a manner that requires such official to 
                have served in the Department for at least 90 days 
                prior to such designation in either the position of the 
                head of a component or in another position by and with 
                the advice and consent of the Senate, or in the event 
                that an official satisfying such criteria is not 
                available, in a manner that requires such official to 
                have served for at least 90 days prior to such 
                designation in the Senior Executive Service in the 
                Department; and
                    ``(B) such other official of the Department to 
                serve as the acting head of a component in the event 
                the head of a component vacates the position, in a 
                manner that requires such official to have served for 
                at least 90 days prior to such designation in the 
                Senior Executive Service.''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
 
                [Letterhead of Hein + Associates appears here]

August 13, 1997


Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C. 20549

We have engaged as principal accountants for Boots & Coots International Well 
Control, Inc. (Commission File No. 33-22097-NY) to audit the consolidated 
financial statements of Boots & Coots International Well Control, Inc. as of and
for the year ended June 30, 1997. We have read Boots & Coots International Well 
Control, Inc.'s statements included under Item 4 of its Form 8-K dated August 
13, 1997, and we agree with such statements.

Respectfully,

/s/ HEIN + ASSOCIATES LLP

Hein + Associates LLP

KRG/keg
# C_2022266EN.01001101.xml

| 11.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 266/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 266/11

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rayonen sad Nesebar (Bulgaria) lodged on 28 March 2022 — Criminal proceedings against QS

(Case C-219/22)

(2022/C 266/13)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Rayonen sad Nesebar

Party to the main proceedings

QS

Question referred

Must Article 3(3) of Council Framework Decision 2008/675/JHA (1)
  of 24 July 2008 on taking account of convictions in the Member States of the European Union in the course of new criminal proceedings be interpreted as precluding national legislation such as Article 68(1) of the NK, in conjunction with Article 8(2) thereof, which provides that the national court seised of an application for execution of the sentence imposed by a previous conviction handed down by a court of another Member State may, for that purpose, alter the arrangements for executing that sentence by ordering its actual execution?

---

(1)  OJ 2008 L 220, p. 32.

---
**Exhibit 99.4**

 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofALARIS Medical, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the Report), I, William C. Bopp, Sr. Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adoptedpursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

/s/ WILLIAM C.BOPP       William C. BoppSenior Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerOctober 31, 2002

 

----
# C_2022222EN.01001201.xml

| 7.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 222/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 222/12

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht (Germany) lodged on 1 March 2022 — MO v SM, as trustee of G GmbH

(Case C-134/22)

(2022/C 222/20)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesarbeitsgericht

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant in the appeal on a point of law: MO

Respondent in the appeal on a point of law: SM, as trustee of G GmbH

Question referred

What is the purpose of the second subparagraph of Article 2(3) of Council Directive 98/59/EC of 20 July 1998 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to collective redundancies, (1) according to which the employer is to forward to the competent public authority a copy of, at least, the elements of the written communication which are provided for in the first subparagraph, point (b), subpoints (i) to (v)?

---

(1)  OJ 1998 L 225, p. 16.

---
No. 11-10461.

#### Miller *v.*Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied,
#### COM. v. KELLY, M.

231 WDA 2017

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/29/2017

CP-42-CR-0000460-2016 (McKean)

Affirmed
2018 EAVS Data Brief: Alabama EAVS Jurisdictions 

67 

 

 

 

 Voter Registration 

Total Registered Voters, 

Nov. 20181 

3,465,352 

1 A1a of EAVS 

Registration Forms Received, 

E-Day 2016 – E-Day 20182 

1,707,185 

2 A3a of EAVS 

New Voters Registered, 

E-Day 2016 – E-Day 20183 

569,730 

3 A3b of EAVS 

Sources of Registration Forms4 

4 A4a-l of EAVS 

Mail/Fax/Email 49,972 

In-Person 113,789 

Online 240,716 

Motor Vehicle Office 1,070,491 

Public Assistance 

Office 52,094 

Disability Office 7,226 

Military Recruitment 

Office 200 

Other Non-NVRA 

Office 

13,347 

Registration Drives 30,405 

Other Sources or 

Not Categorized 128,945 

 Voter Turnout 

Voters Participating by Mode5 

By Mail 

55,908 

3% 

In-Person E-Day 

1,661,254 

96% Other Mode 

6,532 

1% 

5 In-person Election Day 

voters is F1b. By-mail voters

is F1d+F1g. In-person early 

voters is F1f. Other mode is 

F1c+F1e+F1h. 

Total Turnout:6 1,723,694 

6 F1a of EAVS 

Provisional Voters:7 5,362 

7 F1e of EAVS 

UOCAVA Voters:8 1,170 

8 F1c of EAVS 

Election Technology 

67 66 

47 

0 0 

DRE w/o DRE with Ballot Scanner Hand Electronic 

VVPAT VVPAT Marking Count Poll Book 

Device 

35 

Technology Used by Jurisdictions9 



9 F3a-d, F5a-F8a, and 

F11a of EAVS 

Election Policies 

✔ Has online voter registration10 

10 Q6 of Policy Survey 

Has a form of same-day voter registration (SDR)11 

11 Q7 of Policy Survey 

Has all-mail elections statewide12 

Has all-mail elections in certain jurisdictions12 

12 Q9a of Policy Survey 

Allows voters to register as permanent absentee 

voters13 

✔ 13 Q10 of Policy Survey Requires excuse for by-mail voting14 

✔ Requires excuse for in-person early or in-person 14 Q8 of Policy Survey 

absentee voting15 15 Q12a of Policy Survey 

Uses vote centers16 16 Q13 of Policy Survey 

Notes 

EAVS data and reports may be downloaded at 

www.eac.gov. 

Responses of “Does not apply” and “Data not available”

are shown as zeroes.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**Certification
      Pursuant to**


**18
      U.S.C. Section 1350,**


**as
      Adopted Pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Telestone Technologies Corporation
      (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Liu Dongping,
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
      as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Dated:  May
      15,
      2007




By:
            /s/ Liu
              DongpingName:
            Liu
              DongpingTitle:
            Chief
              Financial
              Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
EX-10.12(b)



 Exhibit 10.12(b) 
 June 1, 2013 
 The Cambridge Strategy (Asset Mgt.) Ltd. 

Berger House 
 36-38 Berkeley Square, 7th Floor

 Mayfair, London W1J5AE 
 UK

 Attention: Mr. Tony Henry 
  

	 	Re:	Management Agreement Renewal 

 Dear
Mr. Henry: 
 We are writing with respect to your management agreement concerning the commodity pool to which reference is made below (the
“Management Agreement”). We are extending the term of the Management Agreement through June 30, 2014 and all other provisions of the Management Agreement will remain unchanged. 

 

	 	•	 	 Cambridge Master Fund L.P. 



	 	•	 	 Emerging CTA Portfolio L.P. 



	 	•	 	 MSSB Spectrum Currency & Commodity L.P. 


 Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of Mr. Damian George at the address above or fax to 212-296-6868. If you have any
questions I can be reached at 212-296-1292. 
 Very truly yours, 

 

			
	CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC
		
	By:	 	/s/ Damian George
		 	Damian George
		 	Chief Financial Officer & Director
	
	THE CAMBRIDGE STRATEGY (ASSET MGT.) LTD.
		
	By:            	 	/s/ Edward Baker
		
	 Print Name:
	 	Edward Baker
		
	DG/sr
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 47 (Tuesday, March 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11163-11164]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5928]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-267-000]


ANR Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas 
Tariff

March 5, 1997.
    Take notice that on February 28, 1997, ANR Pipeline Company (ANR) 
tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised 
Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets to become effective March 1, 
1997:

Twentieth Revised Sheet No. 8
Twenty-second Revised Sheet No. 9
Twenty-first Revised Sheet No. 13
Twenty-second Revised Sheet No. 16
Twenty-fifth Revised Sheet No. 18

    ANR states that the above-referenced tariff sheets are being filed 
pursuant to the approved mechanism of its Tariff to implement recovery 
of $2.5 million of above-market costs that are associated

[[Page 11164]]

with its obligations to Dakota Gasification Company (Dakota). ANR 
proposes a reservation surcharge applicable to its Part 284 firm 
transportation customers to collect ninety percent (90%) of the Dakota 
costs, and an adjustment to the maximum base tariff rates of Rate 
Schedule ITS and overrun rates applicable to Rate Schedule FTS-2, so as 
to recover the remaining ten percent (10%). ANR advises that the 
proposed changes would decrease current quarterly Above-Market Dakota 
Cost recoveries from $8.3 million to $2.5 million, based upon lower 
costs incurred from November 1996 through January 1997.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest this filing should file a motion 
to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 
888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with 
Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. 
All such motions or protests must be filed as provided in Section 
154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by 
the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but 
will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any 
person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. 
Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available 
for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-5928 Filed 3-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
## This email is to confirm receipt of the submission of the proprietary documents. They have been added to your file

for review.

Thank you for your interest in aviation safety. FAA Office of Rulemaking

From: gus@airspaceconsulting.com [ gus@airspaceconsulting.com ]

Sent: Friday, August 21, 2015 9:19 PM

To: 9

- AWA

- AVS

- 333Exemptions (FAA) Subject: Proprietary Operating manuals for Docket ID: FAA

- 2015

- 3242

Dear FAA,

Please find the following six (6) proprietary manuals in support of Docket ID: FAA

- 2015

- 3242 :

1) Flight Operations & Procedures Manual 2) Aircraft Flight Manual

- Inova One X8 3) Aircraft Flight Manual

- DJI S1000 4) Aircraft Flight Manual

- Cinestar X8 5) PIC Qualification Process, Test & Logbook 6) VO Qualification Process & Test

Thank you for y our attention to the KinoFly petition for exemption.

Best regards,

Gus Calderon

760

- 519

- 1941 www.airspaceconsulting.com
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8673 

To assign a resident inspector to certain commercial nuclear power plants 

to conduct inspections of decommissioning activities and spent nuclear 

fuel transfer activities. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 23, 2020 

Mr. LEVIN of California (for himself, Mr. ROUDA, and Ms. PORTER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy 

and Commerce 

A BILL 

To assign a resident inspector to certain commercial nuclear 

power plants to conduct inspections of decommissioning 

activities and spent nuclear fuel transfer activities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Increasing Nuclear 

5 Safety Protocols for Extended Canister Transfers Act’’ or 

6 the ‘‘INSPECT Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8673 IH

1 SEC. 2. INSPECTION OF DECOMMISSIONING ACTIVITY AND 

2 SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL TRANSFER ACTIVITY. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Chairman of the Nuclear 

4 Regulatory Commission shall assign, for the duration de5 scribed in subsection (b), a resident inspector to each com6 mercial nuclear power plant that has permanently ceased 

7 operation to conduct inspections of decommissioning ac8 tivities and spent nuclear fuel transfer activities of the 

9 commercial nuclear power plant. 

10 (b) DURATION DESCRIBED.—The duration described 

11 in this subsection is the period of time it takes to transfer 

12 all spent nuclear fuel from the spent fuel pools of the com13 mercial nuclear power plant. 

14 (c) REASSIGNMENT.—If there are no decommis15 sioning activities or spent nuclear fuel transfer activities 

16 at the commercial nuclear power plant to which a resident 

17 inspector is assigned under subsection (a), the Chairman 

18 of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission may assign such 

19 resident inspector to a different commercial nuclear power 

20 plant. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 23.01**

 

**CONSENT OFINDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by referencein Registration Statement No. 333-104504 on Form S-3; RegistrationStatement No. 333-141416 on Form S-3/A; and Registration Statement No. 333-106011on Form S-4 of our report dated February 20, 2008 (which report expresses an unqualifiedopinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption ofFinancial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 48, “Accountingfor Uncertainty in Income Taxes – an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109”),relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statementschedule of Public Service Company of Colorado appearing in this Annual Reporton Form 10-K of Public Service Company of Colorado for the year ended December 31,2007.

 

 
| */s/*DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP |
|-------------------------------------|
| Minneapolis,  Minnesota             |
| February 20, 2008              |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         813,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,742,000
<PP&E>                                      78,627,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              23,815,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              66,905,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,806,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (5,285,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                66,905,000
<SALES>                                      2,933,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,990,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,036,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             841,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (838,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (838,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                214,000
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (624,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.61)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.61)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
23.1











CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form
S-3 (File No. 333-139931 , 333-132497) and Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-142786,
333-84426, 333-103761, 333-125199, 333-76424) of Puget Energy, Inc. and on Form
S-3 (File No. 333-132497-01) of Puget Sound Energy, Inc. of our reports dated
February 29, 2008 relating to the financial statements, financial statement
schedules and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,
which appear in this combined Form 10-K.













/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP
 PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP
 Seattle,
Washington
 February
29, 2008
# C_2021098EN.01003101.xml

| 22.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 98/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 98/31

---

Action brought on 26 January 2021 — About You v EUIPO — Safe-1 Immobilieninvest (Y/O/U YOUR ORIGINAL U)

(Case T-50/21)

(2021/C 98/35)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: About You GmbH (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: W. Mosing, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Safe-1 Immobilieninvest GmbH (Mauer, Austria)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark Y/O/U YOUR ORIGINAL U — European Union trade mark No 10 226 901

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 November 2020 in Case R 529/2020-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | hold an oral hearing; |
| --- | --- |

—

hold an oral hearing;

| — | annul the contested decision with the consequence that EUIPO shall revoke the EUTM entirely; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision with the consequence that EUIPO shall revoke the EUTM entirely;

| — | order EUIPO and, in case it intervenes in writing, the other party to the proceedings before EUIPO, to bear its/their own costs and to compensate the costs incurred by the applicant in the proceeding before the General Court and in the appellate proceeding before EUIPO. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and, in case it intervenes in writing, the other party to the proceedings before EUIPO, to bear its/their own costs and to compensate the costs incurred by the applicant in the proceeding before the General Court and in the appellate proceeding before EUIPO.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of the requirements of evidence in terms of legal certainty and the principle of legitimate expectations; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of the requirements of evidence in terms of legal certainty and the principle of legitimate expectations;

| — | Infringement of Article 58 (in connection with Article 18) and Article 95 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council and respectively in connection with Articles 10, 19 and 27 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 58 (in connection with Article 18) and Article 95 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council and respectively in connection with Articles 10, 19 and 27 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.

---