19484 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 64 / Monday, April 4, 2022 / Notices 

1See Countervailing Duty Order; Certain Heavy 

Iron Construction Casting from Brazil, 51 FR 17786 

(May 15, 1986) (Order). 

2See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 86 

FR 68220 (December 1, 2021) (Initiation Notice). 

3See Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Five Year (‘‘Sunset’’) 

Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on Heavy 

Iron Construction Castings from Brazil—Domestic 

Interested Parties’ Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ 

dated December 16, 2021. 

4 Id. at 3. 

5See GBR’s Letter, ‘‘Iron Construction Castings. 

Sunset Review. Initial Comments,’’ dated December 

30, 2021. 

6See Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Five Year (‘Sunset’) 

Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on Heavy 

Iron Construction Castings from Brazil—Domestic 

Interested Parties’ Substantive Response,’’ dated 

December 31, 2021. 

7See Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Five Year (‘Sunset’) 

Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on Heavy 

Iron Construction Castings from Brazil—Domestic 

Interested Parties’ Comments in Rebuttal to the 

Government of Brazil’s Substantive Response,’’ 

dated January 10, 2022. 

8See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Sunset Reviews 

Initiated on December 1, 2021,’’ dated January 20, 

2022. 

9The scope language contained in prior sunset 

proceedings for the Order has varied. For clarity, 

Commerce intends to use the scope listed above in 

all future proceedings involving the Order. 

10See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the Expedited 

Fifth Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty 

Order on Heavy Iron Construction Castings from 

Brazil,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby 

adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum). 

V. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2022–07003 Filed 4–1–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–351–504] 

Heavy Iron Construction Castings 

From Brazil: Final Results of the 

Expedited Fifth Sunset Review of the 

Countervailing Duty Order 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: As a result of this expedited 

sunset review, the Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) finds that 

revocation of the countervailing duty 

order (CVD) on heavy iron construction 

castings (iron castings) from Brazil 

would be likely to lead to continuation 

or recurrence of countervailable 

subsidies at the levels as indicated in 

the ‘‘Final Results of Sunset Review’’ 

section of this notice. 

DATES: Applicable April 4, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jolanta Lawska, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–8362. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On May 15, 1986, Commerce 

published in Federal Register the CVD 

order on iron castings from Brazil.1 On 

December 1, 2021, Commerce published 

the notice of initiation of the expedited 

fifth sunset review of the Order, 

pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).2 On 

December 16, 2021, Commerce received 

a notice of intent to participate from 

D&L Foundry, Inc., EJ USA, Inc., 

Neenah Foundry Company, and U.S. 

Foundry & Manufacturing Corporation 

(collectively, ‘‘domestic interested 

parties’’), within the deadline specified 

in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).3 Each of 

these companies claimed interested 

party status under section 771(9)(C) of 

the Act, as a domestic producer of the 

domestic like product.4 On December 

30, 2021, Commerce received a 

substantive response and notice of 

intent to participate from the 

Government of Brazil (GBR) within the 

deadline specified in 19 CFR 

351.218(d)(3)(i).5

On December 31, 2021, Commerce 

also received a substantive response to 

the Notice of Initiation from the 

domestic interested parties within the 

deadline specified in 19 CFR 

351.218(d)(3)(i).6 Commerce did not 

receive any substantive response from a 

producer or exporter of subject 

merchandise in Brazil. On January 10, 

2022, the domestic interested parties 

filed rebuttal comments in response to 

the GBR’s substantive response.7 On 

January 20, 2022, Commerce notified 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission that it did not receive a 

substantive response from respondent 

interested parties.8 As a result, 

Commerce has conducted an expedited 

(120-day) sunset review of the Order, 

pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2). 

Scope of the Order 9

The products covered by the Order 

are certain heavy iron construction 

castings from Brazil, limited to manhole 

covers, rings, and frames, catch basin 

grates and frames, cleanout covers and 

frames used for drainage or access 

purposes for public utility, water and 

sanitary systems, classifiable as heavy 

castings under Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule (HTS) item numbers 

7325.10.0010, 7325.10.0020, and 

7325.10.0025. Subject merchandise may 

also enter under 7325.99.1000. The HTS 

item numbers are provided for 

convenience and Customs purposes 

only. The written description remains 

dispositive. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

A complete discussion of all issues 

raised in this sunset review, including 

the likelihood of continuation or 

recurrence of subsidization in the event 

of revocation of the Order and the 

countervailable subsidy rates likely to 

prevail if the Order were to be revoked, 

is provided in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.10 A list of the topics 

discussed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is attached as an 

appendix to this notice. The Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at https://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at https://access.trade.gov/public/ 

FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Final Results of Review 

Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 

752(b) of the Act, we determine that 

revocation of the Order would be likely 

to lead to continuation or recurrence of 

a countervailable subsidy at the rate 

listed below: 

Exporter/producer Subsidy rate 

(percent) 

Country-Wide Rate ... 1.06 Ad Valorem. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues 

to govern business proprietary 

information in this segment of the 

proceeding. Timely written notification 

of return/destruction of APO materials 

or conversion to judicial protective 

order is hereby requested. Failure to 

comply with the regulations and the 

terms of an APO is a sanctionable 

violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

Commerce is issuing and publishing 

these final results and this notice in 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 64 / Monday, April 4, 2022 / Notices 19485 

1See Notice of Final Determination of Sales at 

Less Than Fair Value: Stainless Steel Plate in Coils 

from Belgium, 64 FR 15476 (March 31, 1999); 

Notice of Final Determination of Sales at Less Than 

Fair Value: Stainless Steel Plate in Coils from South 

Africa, 64 FR 15459 (March 31, 1999); and Notice 

of Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair 

Value: Stainless Steel Plate in Coils from Taiwan, 

64 FR 15493 (March 31, 1999) (collectively, Orders). 

2See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 86 

FR 68220 (December 1, 2021) (Initiation Notice). 

3See ATI and NAS’s Letter, ‘‘Five-Year 

(‘‘Sunset’’) Review of the Antidumping Duty Order 

on Stainless Steel Plate in Coils from Belgium— 

Domestic Interested Parties’ Notice of Intent to 

Participate,’’ dated December 15, 2021; see also 

Outokumpu’s Letter, ‘‘Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review 

of the Antidumping Order on Stainless Steel Plate 

in Coils from Belgium—Outokumpu’s Notice of 

Intent to Participate,’’ dated December 15, 2021; 

ATI’s Letter, ‘‘Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review of the 

Antidumping Duty Order on Stainless Steel Plate in 

Coils from South Africa—Domestic Interested 

Party’s Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated 

December 15, 2021; Outokumpu’s Letter, ‘‘FiveYear (‘‘Sunset’’) Review of the Antidumping Order 

on Stainless Steel Plate in Coils from South 

Africa—Outokumpu’s Notice of Intent to 

Participate,’’ dated December 15, 2021; ATI and 

NAS’s Letter, ‘‘Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review of the 

Antidumping Duty Order on Stainless Steel Plate in 

Coils from Taiwan—Domestic Interested Parties’ 

Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated December 15, 

2021; Outokumpu’s Letter, ‘‘Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) 

Review of the Antidumping Order on Stainless 

Steel Plate in Coils from Taiwan—Outokumpu’s 

Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated December 15, 

2021. 

4See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letters, ‘‘FiveYear (‘‘Sunset’’) Review of the Antidumping Duty 

Order on Stainless Steel Plate in Coils from 

Belgium—Domestic Interested Parties’ Substantive 

Response to Notice of Initiation,’’ dated January 3, 

2022; ‘‘Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review of the 

Antidumping Duty Order on Stainless Steel Plate in 

Coils from South Africa—Domestic Interested 

Parties’ Substantive Response to Notice of 

Initiation,’’ dated January 3, 2022; ‘‘Five-Year 

(‘‘Sunset’’) Review of the Antidumping Duty Order 

on Stainless Steel Plate in Coils from Taiwan— 

Domestic Interested Parties’ Substantive Response 

to Notice of Initiation,’’ dated January 3, 2022. 

5Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.303(b)(1), ‘‘if the 

applicable due date falls on a non-business day, the 

Secretary will accept documents that are filed on 

the next business day.’’ As the deadline for the 

filing of substantive responses fell on Friday, 

December 31, 2021, a federal holiday, the deadline 

for filing substantive responses was January 3, 2022. 

6See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Sunset Reviews 

Initiated on December 1, 2021,’’ dated January 20, 

2022. 

7See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Expedited Sunset Reviews of 

the Antidumping Duty Orders on Stainless Steel 

Plate in Coils from Belgium, South Africa, and 

Taiwan,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby 

adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum). 

accordance with sections 751(c), 752(b), 

and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.218. 

Dated: March 28, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. History of the Order 

V. Legal Framework 

VI. Discussion of the Issues 

1. Likelihood of Continuation or 

Recurrence of a Countervailable Subsidy 

2. Net Countervailable Subsidy Rate Likely 

to Prevail 

3. Nature of the Subsidy 

VII. Final Results of Review 

VIII. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2022–07002 Filed 4–1–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–423–808, A–791–805, A–583–830] 

Stainless Steel Plate in Coils From 

Belgium, South Africa, and Taiwan: 

Final Results of the Expedited Fourth 

Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping 

Duty Orders 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: As a result of these expedited 

sunset reviews, the Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) finds that 

revocation of the antidumping duty 

orders on stainless steel plate in coils 

(SSPC) from Belgium, South Africa, and 

Taiwan would be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of dumping 

as indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of 

Sunset Reviews’’ section of this notice. 

DATES: Applicable April 4, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

George McMahon or Carolyn Adie, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement 

and Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–1167 or (202) 482–6250, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On December 1, 2021, Commerce 

published the notice of initiation of the 

fourth sunset reviews of the AD orders 

on SSPC from Belgium, South Africa, 

and Taiwan 1 pursuant to section 751(c) 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 

(the Act).2 In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.218(d)(1)(i) and (ii), ATI Flat Rolled 

Products Holdings, LLC (ATI); North 

American Stainless (NAS); and 

Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC 

(Outokumpu) (collectively, domestic 

interested parties) submitted notices of 

intent to participate in the sunset 

reviews of SSPC from Belgium and 

Taiwan, and ATI and Outokumpu 

submitted notices of intent to 

participate in the sunset review of SSPC 

from South Africa, within 15 days after 

the date of publication of the Initiation 

Notice.3 The domestic interested parties 

claimed interested party status under 

section 771(9)(C) of the Act, as domestic 

producers of SSPC in the United States. 

Commerce received adequate 

substantive responses 4 to the Initiation 

Notice from the domestic interested 

parties within the 30-day period 

specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).5

Commerce received no substantive 

responses from any respondent 

interested parties. On January 20, 2022, 

Commerce notified the U.S. 

International Trade Commission that it 

did not receive adequate substantive 

responses from the respondent 

interested parties.6 As a result, pursuant 

to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce 

conducted expedited (120-day) sunset 

reviews of the Orders. 

Scope of the Orders 

The merchandise subject to the 

Orders is stainless steel plate in coils. A 

full description of the scope of the 

Orders is contained in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum.7

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in these reviews are 

addressed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum, including the likelihood 

of continuation or recurrence of 

dumping in the event of revocation of 

the Orders and the magnitude of the 

dumping margins likely to prevail if the 

Orders were revoked. A list of topics 

discussed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is included as an 

appendix to this notice. Parties can find 

a complete discussion of all issues 

raised in this review and the 

corresponding recommendations in the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum is a 

public document and is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at https://access.trade.gov/ 

public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Final Results of Sunset Reviews 

Pursuant to sections 751(c) and 752(c) 

of the Act, Commerce determines that 

revocation of the Orders would be likely 

to lead to continuation or recurrence of 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES