alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<Page>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 12b

                     PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC AND GAS COMPANY
               COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                 PLUS PREFERRED SECURITIES DIVIDEND REQUIREMENTS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                    For the Years Ended December 31,
                                                 --------------------------------------
                                                  2004    2003    2002    2001    2000
                                                 -----   -----   -----   -----   ------
                                                        (Millions, except ratios)
<S>                                              <C>     <C>     <C>     <C>     <C>
Earnings as Defined in Regulation S-K (A):

Pre-tax Income from Continuing Operations        $ 592   $ 376   $ 320   $ 324   $  994
Fixed Charges                                      369     397     415     469      462
Preferred Securities Dividends, pre-tax             (7)     (7)     (7)     (8)     (15)
                                                 -----   -----   -----   -----   ------
Total Earnings
                                                 $ 954   $ 766   $ 728   $ 785   $1,441
                                                 =====   =====   =====   =====   ======

Fixed Charges as Defined in Regulation S-K (B)

Interest Expense                                 $ 362   $ 390   $ 406   $ 458   $  444
Interest Factor in Rentals                          --      --       2       3        3
Preferred Securities Dividends                       4       4       4       5        9
Adjustment to state Preferred Securities
   Dividends on a pre-income tax basis               3       3       3       3        6
                                                 -----   -----   -----   -----   ------
Total Fixed Charges                              $ 369   $ 397   $ 415   $ 469   $  462
                                                 =====   =====   =====   =====   ======
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                2.59    1.93    1.75    1.67     3.12
                                                 =====   =====   =====   =====   ======
</TABLE>

(A)  The term "earnings" shall be defined as pretax income from continuing
     operations. Add to pretax income the amount of fixed charges adjusted to
     exclude (a) the amount of any interest capitalized during the period (b)
     the actual amount of any preferred securities dividend requirements of
     majority owned subsidiaries (c) preferred stock dividends which were
     included in such fixed charges amount but not deducted in the determination
     of pre-tax income.

(B)  Fixed Charges represent (a) interest, whether expensed or capitalized, (b)
     amortization of debt discount and premium expense (c) an estimate of
     interest implicit in rentals and (d) preferred securities dividend
     requirements of majority owned subsidiaries and preferred stock dividends,
     increased to reflect the pre-tax earnings requirement for PSE&G.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           4,027
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      213
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       1,591,920
<DEPRECIATION>                                 696,458
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,204,829
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           91,539
<BONDS>                                        414,534
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     644,713
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,204,829
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               100,710
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  158,090
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              85,870
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (302,434)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (302,434)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              3,997,619
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,695,185
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   328.33


</TABLE>
Strategic Trends Research Initiative (STRI)

STRI (pronounced “story”) delivers operationally relevant, credible, timely, and actionable insights 

and recommendations to help inform future operations, activities, and investments to mitigate or 

eliminate WMD and related threats and challenges 5-10 years in the future.

UNCLASSIFIED

Deter. Prevent. Prevail. UNCLASSIFIED 1

• Focuses on WMD (CBRN) threats, enabling or disruptive technologies, associated challenges

• Encompasses studies and international Track 1.5 and Track 2 dialogues

• Provides concise analytic products tailored to DTRA, DoD, Interagency, allies and partners, research 

community

• Prioritizes year-after-year advancement and cross-pollination across projects 

• Focuses primarily on UNCLASSIFIED research studies and dialogues (classified work can be undertaken 

in some circumstances) 

STRI accepts white papers at any time. Priority areas are updated each Spring and Autumn through a Broad 

Agency Announcement (BAA) amendment on SAM.gov. 

Contact the STRI Team: dtra.Belvoir.si.mbx.hdtra1-stri-adm@mail.mil.
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****    - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский 

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

        - Student Loans
        - Grants
        - Laws
        - Data

# Paunawa sa mga Taong Limitado ang Kaalaman sa English

# Paunawa sa mga Taong Limitado ang Kaalaman sa English

                                    -        Tanggapan para sa mga Karapatang Sibil
Kung nahihirapan kayong maintindihan ang English maaari kayong humingi sa nagbibigay ng mga tulong na serbisyo kaugnay ng wika, ng impormasyon ng Kagawaran na nakalaan sa publiko.  Ang mga tulong na serbisyo kaugnay ng wika ay libre.  Kung kailangan ninyo ng dagdag na impormasyon tungkol sa mga serbisyo kaugnay ng pagpapaliwanag o pagsasalin, mangyari lamang tumawag sa 1-800-USA-LEARN (1-800-872-5327), TTY: (800) 877-8339 TTY / ASCII (American Standard Code For Information Interchange), o mag-email sa: Ed.Language.Assistance@ed.gov.

O sumulat sa:

U.S. Department of EducationInformation Resource CenterLBJ Education Building 400 Maryland Ave., S.W.Washington, DC 20202
             How Do I Find...?    - Student loans, forgiveness
- Higher Education Rulemaking
- College accreditation
- Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
- FERPA
- FAFSA
- 1098, tax forms
- More...
      Information About...    - Elevating Teaching
- Early Learning
- Engage Every Student
- Unlocking Career Success
- Cybersecurity
             
*Our mission* is to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness by fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access.
- Student Loans
- Repaying Loans
- Defaulted Loans
- Loan Forgiveness
- Loan Servicers
- Grants & Programs
- Apply for Pell Grants
- Grants Forecast
- Apply for a Grant
- Laws & Guidance
- Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
- FERPA
- Civil Rights
- IDEA Website
- Data & Research
- Education Statistics
- Postsecondary Education Data
- ED Data Express
- Nation's Report Card
- What Works Clearinghouse
- Open Data Platform
- COVID Relief Data
- About Us
- Contact Us
- ED Offices
- Jobs
- Press Releases
- FAQs
- Recursos en español
- Budget, Performance
- Privacy Program
- Homeroom Blog
- Notices
- FOIA
- Privacy Policy
- Accessibility
- Security
- Information Quality
- Inspector General
- Whitehouse.gov
- USA.gov
- Benefits.gov
- Regulations.gov
# C_2023296EN.01000801.xml

| 21.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 296/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 296/8

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 6 July 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court — Ireland) — OE v The Minister for Justice and Equality

(Case C-142/22, (1) The Minister for Justice and Equality (Request for consent — Effects of the initial European arrest warrant)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters - European arrest warrant - Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA - Article 27 - Prosecution for an offence committed prior to the person’s surrender other than that for which he or she was surrendered - Request for consent sent to the executing judicial authority - European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor of a Member State which is not an issuing judicial authority - Consequences for the request for consent)

(2023/C 296/08)

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Supreme Court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: OE

Defendant: The Minister for Justice and Equality

Operative part of the judgment

Article 27(3)(g) and (4) of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States

must be interpreted as meaning that the fact that a European arrest warrant on the basis of which a person has been the subject of a surrender decision has been issued by an authority which did not constitute an ‘issuing judicial authority’ within the meaning of Article 6(1) of that framework decision, does not preclude the executing judicial authority, to which a request to that effect has been made by an issuing judicial authority within the meaning of Article 6(1), from subsequently giving its consent to that person being prosecuted, sentenced or otherwise deprived of his or her liberty for an offence committed prior to his or her surrender other than that for which he or she was surrendered.

---

(1)  OJ C 191, 10.5.2022.

---
#### COM. v. BANKS, D.

2725 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/25/2017

Reargument Denied 10/25/2017

CP-15-CR-0004269-2007 (Chester)

Affirmed
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**Certification
      Pursuant to**


**18
      U.S.C. Section 1350,**


**as
      Adopted Pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Telestone Technologies Corporation
      (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Han Daqing,
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
      as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Dated:  May
      15,
      2007




By:
            /s/ Han
              DaqingName:
            Han
              DaqingTitle:
            Chief
              Executive
              Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
# C_2023286EN.01001302.xml

| 14.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 286/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 286/13

---

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 17 April 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione tributaria regionale per il Friuli Venezia Giulia — Italy) — Ferriere Nord SpA, SIAT — Società Italiana Acciai Trafilati SpA, Acciaierie di Verona SpA v Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (AGCM), Agenzia delle entrate — Riscossione

(Case C-560/22, (1) Ferriere Nord and Others)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - National competition authorities - Imposition of a contribution to finance those authorities - Lack of connection to EU law - Manifest lack of jurisdiction of the Court - Lack of sufficient information - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2023/C 286/15)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Commissione tributaria regionale per il Friuli Venezia Giulia

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellants: Ferriere Nord SpA, SIAT — Società Italiana Acciai Trafilati SpA, Acciaierie di Verona SpA

Respondents: Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (AGCM), Agenzia delle entrate — Riscossione

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Commissione tributaria regionale per il Friuli Venezia Giulia (Regional Tax Court, Friuli Venezia Giulia, Italy), by decision of 30 June 2022, is manifestly inadmissible.

---

(1)  OJ C 441, 21.11.2022.

---
Request for Information James D Sanders (FAA-2015-3720) 

9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions (FAA) 

Dear Mr. Sanders: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. 

FAA−2015−3720). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your 

petition.

 Describe the aircraft makes, models, and types (i.e., fixed-wing, rotorcraft, lighter-than-air) for the proposed 

UAS operation. The descriptions should include the maximum weight (including payload). This information 

can be located in the aircraft manuals.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov. Once your 

information has been submitted, please also send a copy of the requested information (and any proprietary 

information), as well as your comment tracking number from regulations.gov via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If

you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by November 18, 

2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-2999 .

 

FAA Office of Rulemaking 

Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2015 3:18 PM 

To: jsanders1974@gmail.com
# C_2021128EN.01004301.xml

| 12.4.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 128/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.4.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 128/43

---

Action brought on 12 February 2021 — Darment v. Commission

(Case T-92/21)

(2021/C 128/51)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Darment Oy (Helsinki, Finland) (represented by: C. Ginter, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the defendant’s decision to reduce the quota allocated to the applicant for the year 2021 for the placing of hydrofluorocarbons on the market about which the applicant was informed via F-Gas Portal System of the defendant on 15 December 2020 and by the email of 12 January 2021; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the defendant’s decision to reduce the quota allocated to the applicant for the year 2021 for the placing of hydrofluorocarbons on the market about which the applicant was informed via F-Gas Portal System of the defendant on 15 December 2020 and by the email of 12 January 2021;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging that the defendant infringed Article 266 TFEU by imposing the penalty on the applicant even though the Court annulled the defendant’s decision finding that the applicant exceeded in 2017 its quota for the placing of HFC on the market and imposing the penalty on it; |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging that the defendant infringed Article 266 TFEU by imposing the penalty on the applicant even though the Court annulled the defendant’s decision finding that the applicant exceeded in 2017 its quota for the placing of HFC on the market and imposing the penalty on it;

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging that the defendant infringed Article 25(2) of Regulation (EU) 517/2014, (1) in conjunction with Article 42 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU, by continuing to impose the Penalty to the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging that the defendant infringed Article 25(2) of Regulation (EU) 517/2014, (1) in conjunction with Article 42 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU, by continuing to impose the Penalty to the applicant.

---

(1)  Regulation (EU) No 517/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on fluorinated greenhouse gases and repealing Regulation (EC) No 842/2006 Text with EEA relevance (OJ 2014 L 150, p. 195)

---
#### COM. v. EDWARDS, D.

1917 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/27/2017

CP-48-CR-0004090-2010 (Northampton)

Affirmed
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John Elwood BUCKNER, a/k/a Bear, a/k/a John Branch, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-6498

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: February 28, 2018

Decided: March 12, 2018

Alicia Vachira Penn, OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellant. Sean Kittrell, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE . UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before DUNCAN and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

John Elwood Buckner seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certifícate of ap-pealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2¿53(e)(l)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief , on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

*274We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Buckner has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

VINCENT H. REICH,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 276 WAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 14th day of February, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8783 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8783

   To amend title 40, United States Code, to add certain California 
counties to the region of the Southwest Border Regional Commission, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 19, 2020

Mr. Cox of California introduced the following bill; which was referred 
to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition 
to the Committee on Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 40, United States Code, to add certain California 
counties to the region of the Southwest Border Regional Commission, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SOUTHWEST BORDER REGIONAL COMMISSION.

    (a) Addition of Certain California Counties.--Section 15732(2) of 
title 40, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``Fresno,'' before ``Imperial,'';
            (2) by inserting ``Kern, Kings,'' before ``Los Angeles,''; 
        and
            (3) by inserting ``Tulare,'' before ``and Ventura''.
    (b) Technical Correction.--Section 15732(4) of title 40, United 
States Code, is amended by striking ``Tom Green'' and inserting ``Tom 
Green,''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 44 (Thursday, March 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 10290]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5473]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[(NM-930-1310-01); (NMNM 92169)]


New Mexico: Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas 
Lease

    Under the provisions of Public Law 97-451, a petition for 
reinstatement of oil and gas lease NMNM 92169 for lands in Chaves 
County, New Mexico, was timely filed and was accompanied by all 
required rentals and royalties accruing from December 1, 1996, the date 
of termination.
    No valid lease has been issued affecting the lands. The lessee has 
agreed to new lease terms of rentals and royalties at rates of $10.00 
per acre or fraction thereof and 16\2/3\ percent, respectively. The 
lessee has paid the required $500 administrative fee and has reimbursed 
the Bureau of Land Management for the cost of this Federal Register 
notice.
    The Lessee has met all the requirements for reinstatement of the 
lease as set out in Sections 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Leasing Act 
of 1930 (30 USC 188), and the Bureau of Land Management is proposing to 
reinstate the lease effective December 1, 1996, subject to the original 
terms and conditions of the lease and the increased rental and royalty 
rates cited above.
    For further information contact: Lourdes B. Ortiz, BLM, New Mexico 
State Office, (505) 438-7586.

    Dated: February 26, 1997.
Lourdes B. Ortiz,
Land Law Examiner
[FR Doc. 97-5473 Filed 3-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-FB-M