alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: In re Ku bosh Bail Bonding, Kubosh Law Office, Paul Kubosh and Felix Michael Kubosh , Relator s

Appellate case number s : 01

- 1 6

- 0 0 417

- CV, 01

- 16

- 00418

- CV, and 01

- 16

- 00419

- CV

Trial court case number s : 2013

- 50819, 2015

- 39797, and 2015

- 39798

Trial court: 129th District Court of H a rri s County

On Ma y 24

, 201 6 , the relator s , Kubosh Bail Bonding, Kubosh Law Office, Paul Kubosh and Felix Michael Kubosh , filed a petition for writ of mandamus seeking to vacate the respondent trial judge’s March 31 , 201 6 order denying relators’ motion to compel release of emails and for entry of an order granting that motion in the three underlying consolidated trial court cases

. On May 26, 2016, this Court granted the relators’ motion to stay all the underlying proceedings a nd requested a response.
On June 2, 2016, the relators filed this “Motion for Order for Transfer of In Camera Documents to Court of Appeals” seeking to have the trial court make a copy of the emails in question and to have them transferred to the Clerk of this Court for this Court’s disposition of the petition. With their petition, relators had filed six volumes of a sworn record in this Court, including a blank exhibit Tab 25 in Volume 5 that referred to the emails in question that were filed in camera with the trial court . Relators indicated that these emails we re to be delivered under seal by the trial court clerk to this Court

. Accordingly, we grant the relator s ’ motion to transfer the in camera documents to this Court. We ORDER the respondent, the Honorable Michael Gomez, presiding judge of the 129th District Court of Harris County, to direct the district clerk to make a copy of the emails submitt ed in camera with the trial court, Bates

- labeled CARTER 001352

- 001358, onto a USB flash drive . We further ORDER the respondent to direct the district clerk to have th is USB flash drive hand

- delivered, via a courier charged to relators, to the Clerk of this Court in a sealed envelope marked, “Sworn Record Tab 25

— CONFIDENTIAL,” with the above appellate cause numbers and style, within 10 days of this order

. Cf. T EX

. R. C IV

. P. 193.4(a).We sua sponte lift th e stay imposed on May 26, 2016, in the three underlying trial

court cause numbers above for the limited purpose of ordering the respondent to direct the district clerk to comply with this Order. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.10 (b).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: / s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

 Acting individually

Date: J une 7, 2016
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" in the
Registration Statement (Form S-3) and related Prospectus of US Unwired, Inc. for
the registration of 2,074,241 shares of its common stock and to the
incorporation by reference therein of our report dated January 25, 2002, except
for Note 14 as to which the date is February 8, 2002, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of US Unwired, Inc. included in
its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2001, filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission.


                                             /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Houston, Texas
March 27, 2002
Exhibit
32.1









CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO




18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Beverly Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jonathan Roylance, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer,
Secretary and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350,
as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.         The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.         The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period
covered by the Report.




March
      25, 2008
              By:
              /s/ Jon
      RoylanceJon
      RoylancePresident,
      Chief Executive Officer,Chief
      Financial Officer, Secretary and Director (Principal
      Executive, Financial, and Accounting Officer)




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1

The Honorable E. Richard Webber, United States District Judge for the

Eastern District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 04-3958

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

v. * Eastern District of Missouri.

*

Marcus A. Wilkins, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: October 7, 2005

Filed: October 12, 2005 

___________

Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Marcus Wilkins pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of firearms and

ammunition, see 18 U.S.C. § 922(g), and was sentenced to 55 months imprisonment

(later amended to 43 months) and 3 years supervised release, see 18 U.S.C.

§§ 924(a)(2) (10-year maximum prison term), 3559(a)(3) (Class C felony), 3583(b)(2)

(3-year maximum supervised release term for Class C felony). The district court1

later revoked supervised release upon Wilkins’s admission of violations; and imposed

a new sentence of 6 months imprisonment and 2 years supervised release, with special
-2-

conditions requiring the mental-health and drug-abuse treatment Wilkins requested.

Wilkins appeals this sentence. 

We note that both the prison term and the supervised release term were within

authorized limits, and that the district court considered appropriate factors in

imposing the revocation sentence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e) (requiring consideration

of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors; authorizing up to 2 years imprisonment upon

revocation of supervised release where original offense was Class C felony),

§ 3583(h) (authorizing new period of supervised release not to exceed maximum term

of supervised release for original offense, less any prison time imposed upon

revocation of supervised release). We conclude that Wilkins’s sentence is not

unreasonable. See United States v. Tyson, 413 F.3d 824, 825 (8th Cir. 2005) (per

curiam) (standard of review).

Accordingly, we affirm, and we also grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. 

______________________________
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-26-1998             DEC-27-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-28-1997             DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-27-1998             JUN-28-1997
<CASH>                                          54,491                  30,720
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  343,404                 257,358
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,676                   3,970
<INVENTORY>                                    403,728                 464,145
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               822,760                 761,066
<PP&E>                                          93,442                  69,674
<DEPRECIATION>                                 100,993                  68,515
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,162,688                 944,912
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          615,972                 679,197
<BONDS>                                        141,500                  55,250
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                         1,670                   1,153
<OTHER-SE>                                     399,554                 205,859
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,162,688                 944,912
<SALES>                                      2,139,706               1,813,904
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,139,706               1,813,904
<CGS>                                        1,964,553               1,663,800
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,964,553               1,663,800
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               122,774                 115,658
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,886                  14,184
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 35,493                  20,262
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,602                   8,308
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             20,891                  11,954
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,891                  11,954
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.37                    1.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.15                    0.94
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
REGISTRANT'S  UNAUDITED  CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND
UNAUDITED  CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS  FOR THE NINE MONTHS THEN ENDED
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                          0
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   191,497
<ALLOWANCES>                    26,088
<INVENTORY>                     1,317,649
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                1,572,735
<PP&E>                          1,787,312
<DEPRECIATION>                  470,259
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  4,637,945
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           5,484,158
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        (2,150,469)
<OTHER-SE>                      0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    4,637,945
<SALES>                         2,929,535
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                3,014,988
<CGS>                           3,636,942
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   4,168,965
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                323,387
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              386,717
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (4,492,352)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   (2.88)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (2.88)
        


</TABLE>
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

___________________________ No. 02

- 19

- 00126

- CR

___________________________

On Appeal from the 432nd District Co urt Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 1522625D

Before Gabriel, Kerr, and Bassel, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Bassel



### W ILLIAM 

### P A UL 

### D ODD 

### , Appellant

V



### . T HE 

### S TATE OF 

### T EXAS2 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant William P aul Dodd pleaded guilty, without a plea

- bargain agreement , to the offense of robbery

. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 2 9.02

. The trial cou rt acce pted
Dodd ’ s plea and ordered the preparation of a presentence

- investigation report (PSI). After reviewing the PSI and hearing evidence during the sentencing hearing, the trial
court found Dodd guilty of robbery and sentenced him to ten years ’ confinement. In his sole issue, Dodd argues that his ten

- year sentence i s grossly disproportionate

. Dodd did not objec t to his sentence when the trial cour t imposed it and did n ot raise the complaint in a motion for new trial or other post

- trial motion

. This type o f
claim must be raised at the trial court level to preserve it for appel lat e review. See
Ban ister v. S t ate , 551 S.W.3d 768, 769 (Tex. App.

— Fort W o rth 2017, no pet.); Poll ock v.
State , 405 S.W.3d 396, 40 5

– 06 (Tex. App.

— Fort Worth 2013, no pet.); Kim v. Sta t e , 283 S.W.3d 473, 475 (Tex. App.

— Fort Worth 2009, pet. ref ’ d) ; cf. Bur t v. State , 396 S.W.3d 574, 577 (Tex

. Crim. App. 2013) (“A sentencing issue may be pr eserved by objecting at the pun ishment hearing [] or when the sentence is pronounced.”).
Because Dod d forfeited his c omplaint by not objecting to his sentence in the t rial
court, we overrule his sole issue

. 1

1 Even if we wer e to reach the merits of Dodd ’ s disproportionate

- sentence complaint, his punishment is wi thin the statutory limits for the of fense. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 12.3 3 (providin g that a second

- degree felon y is punishable b y two to t wenty years in prison and by a fine of up to $10,000), § 29.02(b) (providing that rob bery is a second

- degree felony ). Punishment that is imposed withi n the statutory limits and based upon the sentence r ’ s informed normative judgm ent is generally not3 Having o verruled Dodd ’ s sole issue, w e affirm the trial court ’ s judgment. /s/ Dabney Bassel Dabney Bas sel Justice
Do Not Publish Tex. R. App. P. 4 7.2(b)
Delivered : December 31, 2019

subject to challenge for excessi veness except in “exceedingly rare” situations. Kim , 2 83 S.W.3d at 475

– 76 (quoting Ex pa rte Chavez , 213 S.W.3d 320, 323

– 24 ( Tex. Crim. App. 2006)).
CCIT II EX 10.5 12/31/2013


Exhibit 10.5




FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE 
ADVISORY AGREEMENT
BY AND BETWEEN
COLE OFFICE & INDUSTRIAL REIT (CCIT II), INC.
AND
COLE CORPORATE INCOME ADVISORS II, LLC
This FIRST AMENDMENT of the ADVISORY AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is made as of November 12, 2013 by and between COLE OFFICE & INDUSTRIAL REIT (CCIT II), INC., a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), and COLE CORPORATE INCOME ADVISORS II, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Advisor”).  This Amendment amends that certain Advisory Agreement, dated as of August 27, 2013, by and between the Company and the Advisor (the “Advisory Agreement”).  All capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meanings given to each in the Advisory Agreement.
WHEREAS, the Board, including all of the Independent Directors, has determined to amend Section 4.02 of the Advisory Agreement; and 
WHEREAS, Section 6.04 of the Advisory Agreement provides that the Advisory Agreement shall not be changed, modified, or amended, in whole or in part, except by an instrument in writing signed by both parties thereto, or their respective successors or assignees;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, covenants and agreements herein contained, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows:
1.    The second sentence of Section 4.02 of the Advisory Agreement is hereby deleted and replaced with the following:
This Agreement also may be terminated at the option of either party upon 60 days written notice without cause or penalty (if termination is by the Company, then such termination shall be upon the approval of a majority of the Independent Directors). 
2.    This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original as against any party whose signature appears thereon, and all of such counterparts shall together constitute one and the same instrument.  This Amendment shall become binding when one or more counterparts hereof, individually or taken together, shall bear the signatures of all of the parties.  
3.    Except as specifically amended hereby and as previously amended, the Advisory Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
[SIGNATURES APPEAR ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE]





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.


COLE OFFICE & INDUSTRIAL REIT (CCIT II), INC.
By: /s/ D. KIRK MCALLASTER, JR.
D. Kirk McAllaster, Jr.
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer






COLE CORPORATE INCOME ADVISORS II, LLC






By: /s/ JEFFREY C. HOLLAND
Jeffrey C. Holland
President and Chief Operating Officer 



2
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8686 

To amend the CARES Act to require an extension of subsidies for certain 

loan payments, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 27, 2020 

Mr. CARSON of Indiana introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Small Business 

A BILL 

To amend the CARES Act to require an extension of 

subsidies for certain loan payments, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Business 

5 COVID–19 Debt Relief Extension Act of 2020’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SUBSIDY FOR CERTAIN LOAN PAYMENTS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1112(c)(1) of the CARES 

8 Act (15 U.S.C. 9011(c)(1)) is amended— 

9 (1) by striking ‘‘6-month period’’ each place it 

10 appears and inserting ‘‘12-month period’’; and 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8686 IH

1 (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘and’’ at 

2 the end; 

3 (3) in subparagraph (C), by striking ‘‘; and’’ 

4 and inserting a semicolon; and 

5 (4) by adding at the end the following new sub6 paragraph: 

7 ‘‘(D) with respect to a covered loan made 

8 on or after the date of the enactment of the 

9 Small Business COVID–19 Debt Relief Exten10 sion Act of 2020, for the period ending on Sep11 tember 30, 2021, if the borrower of such cov12 ered loan submits a request to the Adminis13 trator on or before March 30, 2021.’’. 

14 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

15 this section shall apply as if included in the enactment 

16 of section 1112 of the CARES Act (15 U.S.C. 9011). 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
No. 11-10517.

#### Anderson *v.*Brunsman, Warden.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 68 (Friday, April 8, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 20888]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-07536]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION

Office of Government Information Services

[NARA-2022-039]


Chief Freedom of Information Act Officers Council Meeting

AGENCY: Office of Government Information Services (OGIS), National 
Archives and Records Administration (NARA), and Office of Information 
Policy (OIP), Department of Justice (DOJ).

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are announcing a meeting of the Chief Freedom of 
Information Act (FOIA) Officers Council, co-chaired by the Director of 
OGIS and the Director of OIP.

DATES: The meeting will be on Thursday, April 21, 2022, from 10:00 a.m. 
to 12:00 noon EST. Please register for the meeting no later than 11:59 
p.m. EST on Tuesday, April 19, 2022 (registration information is 
detailed below).

ADDRESSES: The April 21, 2022, meeting will be a virtual meeting. We 
will send access instructions to those who register according to the 
instructions below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Martha Murphy, by email at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#09666e607a4967687b68276e667f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="93fcf4fae0d3fdf2e1f2bdf4fce5">[email protected]</span></a> with the subject line ``Chief FOIA Officers Council,'' or 
by telephone at 202.741.5770.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This meeting is open to the public in 
accordance with the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552(k)). 
Additional details about the meeting, including the agenda, will be 
available on OGIS's website at https://www.archives.gov/ogis/about-ogis/chief-foia-officers-council and OIP's website at https://www.justice.gov/oip/chief-foia-officers-council.
    Procedures: This virtual meeting is open to the public. You must 
register through Eventbrite at https://www.eventbrite.com/e/chief-foia-officers-council-meeting-april-21-2022-tickets-311205432827 in advance 
if you wish to submit oral statements. You must include an email 
address so that we can provide you access information. We will also 
live-stream the meeting on the National Archives' YouTube channel at 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pgQqhwMU9I and include a captioning 
option. To request additional accommodations (e.g., a transcript), 
email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2e4149475d6e404f5c4f00494158"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e58a828c96a58b849784cb828a93">[email protected]</span></a> or call 202-741-5770. Members of the media who wish 
to register, those who are unable to register online, and those who 
require special accommodations, should contact Martha Murphy (contact 
information listed above).

Alina M. Semo,
Director, Office of Government Information Services.
[FR Doc. 2022-07536 Filed 4-7-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7515-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### I N THE UNI TED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FI F TH CI RCUI T

No. 13-40282 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. WILBOR EMIN MEZA DUQUE, also known as Wilber Meza, Defendant-Appellant

A ppeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:12-CR-760-1
Before DAVIS, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender ap p o i n t e d to represent Wilbor Emin Meza Duque has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. C

alifornia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United S tates v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Meza Duque has fil e d a r e s ponse. We have r eviewed counsel’s brief a nd the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well

as Meza D uque’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivo l o u s issue for appellate review. Accordingly, c ounsel’s U n i t e d S t a te s C o u r t o f A p p e al s

F i f t h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D Decem ber 17, 2013 Ly l e W . Cay ce Clerk

* Purs uant to 5 T H C I R
. R

. 47. 5, the court has d eterm ined that this op inion should not be p ublis hed and is not p reced ent excep t und er the lim ited circum s tances s et forth in 5 T H C I R
. R. 47. 5. 4. Case: 13-40282 Document: 00512473888 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/17/2013No. 13-40282

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused f rom further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS D ISMISSED. See 5 T H C I R
. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 13-40282 Document: 00512473888 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/17/2013
No. 11-10596.

#### Varnes *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.