alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-4.1



 Exhibit
4.1                       
  





 

			
		  	








 The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this Certificate, shall
be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: 
  

					
	        TEN COM	 	– as tenants in common	  	UNIF GIFT MIN
ACT–                    Custodian                 
   
	        TEN ENT	 	– as tenants by the entireties	  	                                   
     (Cust)                            (Minor)
	        JT TEN	 	– as joint tenants with right	  	                    under Uniform Gifts to Minors
		 	    of survivorship and not as tenants	  	    Act                            
		 	    in common	  	(State)

 Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. 

For value received,
                                         
                                         
                                         
                          hereby sell, assign and transfer unto 

 

			
	 PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER

IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE

 
	  	
	 	
	 	  	

  
  

(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE) 

 
  
  

 

                          
                                         
                                         
                                         
                                         
                                         
                           shares 

of the common stock evidenced by this Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint 

                          
                                         
                                         
                                         
                                         
                                         
                       Attorney 
 to
transfer the said shares on the books of the within-named Corporation with full power of substitution. 
 Dated
                                         
                                         
   
  

					
		  		  	 X

			
		  		  	 X

			
		  	NOTICE:	  	THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME OF THE STOCKHOLDER(S) AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.

  
 Signature(s) Guaranteed: 

 

			
	  
 THE SIGNATURE(S) SHOULD BE GUARANTEED
BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15.
#### A. SCHULMAN, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. POLYONE CORPORATION, Spartech LLC, Defendants-Appellees

2017-2035

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

February 20, 2018

Eric C. Cohen, Brinks Gilson & Lione, Chicago, IL, argued for plaintiff-appellant. *1008Also represented by Laura A. Lydigsen, Mark Herbert Remus.

Arne M. Olson, Olson *&*Cepuritis, Ltd., Chicago, IL, argued for defendants-appel-lees. Also represented by Brian Michalek, Robert J. Ross.

(Newman, Lourie, and Dyk, Circuit-Judges).

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
# C_2022002EN.01005101.xml

| 3.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 2/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 2/51

---

Action brought on 8 November 2021 — Kaczorowska v EUIPO — Groupe Marcelle (MAESELLE)

(Case T-716/21)

(2022/C 2/70)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Katarzyna Kaczorowska (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: P. Kurcman, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Groupe Marcelle Inc. (Lachine, Quebec, Canada)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark MAESELLE– Application for registration No 18 131 833

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 September 2021 in Case R 670/2021-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | annul the decision of Opposition Division dated 15/02/2021 in opposition proceedings No B 3 108 583 with respect to all the goods and services for which the opposition has been upheld; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of Opposition Division dated 15/02/2021 in opposition proceedings No B 3 108 583 with respect to all the goods and services for which the opposition has been upheld;

| — | refer the case back to EUIPO so it can amend the decision on the substance of the case and register the trade mark at issue in respect of all the goods and services covered, without prejudice to those which are uncontested; |
| --- | --- |

—

refer the case back to EUIPO so it can amend the decision on the substance of the case and register the trade mark at issue in respect of all the goods and services covered, without prejudice to those which are uncontested;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings before the Opposition Division, Board of Appeal and General Court. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings before the Opposition Division, Board of Appeal and General Court.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
November 12 2009
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8742 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8742

  To extend the availability of amounts under the Coronavirus Relief 
                                 Fund.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 12, 2020

 Mr. Keating introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend the availability of amounts under the Coronavirus Relief 
                                 Fund.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION.

    Section 601(d)(3) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 801(d)(3)) 
is amended by striking ``December 30, 2020'' and inserting ``December 
30, 2021''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT
32.1




Certification
Pursuant to


18
U.S.C. Section 1350,


as
Adopted Pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Telestone Technologies Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Han Daqing,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Dated: May
15, 2009




By:
              /s/ Han DaqingName:
              Han
      DaqingTitle:
              Chief
      Executive Officer (Principal Executive
Officer)
#### Melvin SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Brad LIVINGSTON; William H. Jones, III; Fernando Fuster; Jaquelin Brown; Derrick Washington; Tamika Williams; Gina D. Quast; B. Burnett, Defendants-Appellees

No. 17-20055 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed March 5, 2018

Melvin Smith, Pro Se

Before KING, ELROD, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

*406PER CURIAM: *

Melvin Smith appeals the dismissal, for want of prosecution, of his 28 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action against various employees of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. *See*Fed. R. Crv. P. 41(b). The district court dismissed the case without prejudice upon finding that Smith had failed to timely comply with its previous order to provide a more definite statement of the facts underlying his § 1983 claims. That order instructed Smith to file his more definite statement by January 10, 2017. In an uncontroverted , sworn declaration, Smith asserts that he deposited his statement in the prison mail system on January 9, 2017. *See Cooper v. Brookshire,*70 F.3d 377, 379-81 (5th Cir. 1995) (prisoner mailbox rule). Furthermore, Smith’s statement was filed by the district court clerk on January 12, 2017, within two business days after the filing deadline. *See Houston v. Lack,*487 U.S. 266, 269-76, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988); *Sonnier v. Johnson,*161 F.3d 941, 945 (5th Cir. 1998). Under either scenario, Smith’s more definitive statement was timely filed. The district court thus abused its discretion in dismissing his § 1983 action for want of prosecution. *See Larson v. Scott,*157 F.3d 1030, 1032 (5th Cir. 1998).

Accordingly, we VACATE the order dismissing Smith’s § 1983 action for want of prosecution and REMAND the case to the district court for further proceedings.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
IIB 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8611 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 11, 2020 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 4755 Southeast Dixie Highway in Port 

Salerno, Florida, as the ‘‘Joseph Bullock Post Office 

Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 8611 RFS

1 SECTION 1. JOSEPH BULLOCK POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 4755 Southeast Dixie Highway 

4 in Port Salerno, Florida, shall be known and designated 

5 as the ‘‘Joseph Bullock Post Office Building’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Joseph Bullock Post 

10 Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 10, 

2020. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                    Form 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT

                     Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
                         Securities Exchange Act of 1934

                                November 27, 2002
                Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)


                           UNIFAB International, Inc.
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Louisiana                          0-29416              72-1382998
(State or other jurisdiction of           (Commission           (IRS Employer
        incorporation)                    File Number)       Identification No.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                 5007 Port Road
                           New Iberia, Louisiana 70562
               (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)


                                 (337) 367-8291
              (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)


                                 Not Applicable
         (Former name or former address, if changed since last report)

<PAGE>

Item 5.  Other Events.

 See the attached Press Release filed by the Company on November 27, 2002.

Item 7.  Financial Statements and Exhibits.

 (a)     No financial statements are filed with this report.

 (b)     No pro forma financial information is filed with this report.

 (c)     Exhibits.

         99.1     Press release issued by the Company on November 27, 2002.




                                    SIGNATURE

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

                                  By: /s/ Peter J. Roman
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Peter J. Roman
                                      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Dated:  December 5, 2002
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ERICK ALFONSO ESCOBAR,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-73629

Agency No. A072-707-977

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 10, 2010** 

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, HAWKINS, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

Erick Alfonso Escobar, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to

reopen deportation proceedings. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. 

We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen and review the

FILED

AUG 30 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-73629

BIA’s factual findings for substantial evidence. Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 F.3d

983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for

review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Escobar’s motion to reopen

as untimely because Escobar filed the motion over two years after the BIA’s final

administrative decision, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and Escobar failed to

establish changed circumstances in Guatemala to qualify for the regulatory

exception to the time limitation, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(ii); see also

Najmabadi, 597 F.3d at 991 (substantial evidence supported BIA’s conclusion that

evidence submitted with motion to reopen was not qualitatively different from the

evidence presented at the original hearing).

We lack jurisdiction to review Escobar’s ineffective assistance of counsel

claim because he failed to exhaust it before the BIA. See Puga v. Chertoff,

488 F.3d 812, 815-16 (9th Cir. 2007). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8770 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8770

  To direct the Attorney General to establish a national strategy to 
              combat voter fraud, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 18, 2020

Mr. Budd (for himself and Mr. Bishop of North Carolina) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To direct the Attorney General to establish a national strategy to 
              combat voter fraud, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Combat Voter Fraud Act''.

SEC. 2. NATIONAL STRATEGY TO COMBAT VOTER FRAUD.

    The Attorney General shall establish a national strategy to combat 
voter fraud. Such strategy shall address the following:
            (1) Intimidation, coaching, or influencing voters at the 
        polls by election officials.
            (2) The back-dating of ballots.
            (3) Improper ballot counting procedures.
            (4) Foreign interference.
            (5) Voting system glitches, including electronic tabulation 
        irregularities.
            (6) Hacking of voting systems.
            (7) Audits of voting systems.
            (8) Proper oversight of the tabulation of ballots, 
        including allowing poll observers meaningful access to watch 
        the counting of mail-in ballots.
            (9) Voter identification and missing proof of 
        identification.
            (10) Any other matter that the Attorney General determines 
        is critical to combat voter fraud.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 32.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350*


In connection with the Annual Report of PGI Incorporated (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Laurence A. Schiffer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbones-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
         of the Company.



/s/ Laurence A. Schiffer
---------------------------------------
    Laurence A. Schiffer
    Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)           May 4, 2007


<FN>
*A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company
 and will be retained by the Company and will be furnished to the Securities
 and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                               GKH PARTNERS, L.P.
                                November 12, 2002

                                                      Melvyn N. Klein
                                                      Managing General Partner

Mark S. Berg. Esq.
Senior Vice President and General Counsel
Hanover Compressor Company
12001 N. Houston Rosslyn

Houston, TX  77086

Dear Mark:

     I am writing to let you know that the General Partner of GKH Investments,
L.P. has notified its limited partners today that it is extending the winding-up
process of the Partnership for an additional twelve months (i.e., from January
25, 2003 until January 25, 2004).

     It needs to be emphasized, however, that no decision has been made as to
when or how the Hanover Compressor shares held by the Partnership will be
distributed. The General Partner reserves the right to distribute some or all of
the shares at any time. Therefore, no inference should be drawn from the
extension of the life of the Partnership that the Partnership will, in fact,
avail itself of the extension.

                                           Sincerely,

                                           /s/ Melvyn N. Klein

                                           Melvyn N. Klein

MNK/sb
EXHIBIT 99.1

        Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18
                            of the United States Code

     I, Robert E. Busch, Chief Financial Officer of Public Service Electric and
Gas Company, to the best of my knowledge, certify that (i) the Annual Report of
Public Service Electric and Gas Company on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2002 (the "Periodic Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information
contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Public Service Electric and Gas
Company.

                                        /s/ Robert E. Busch
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Robert E. Busch
                                        Public Service Electric and Gas Company
                                        Senior Vice President - Finance and
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        February 25, 2003
# C_2023278EN.01000901.xml

| 7.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 278/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 278/9

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 22 June 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Noord-Holland — Netherlands) — PR Pet BV v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Douane, kantoor Eindhoven

(Case C-24/22, (1) PR Pet)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Common Customs Tariff - Classification of goods - Combined Nomenclature - Heading 9403 - Articles consisting of a structure, intended for cats, referred to as ‘cat scratching posts’ - Goods consisting of a variety of materials - Implementing Regulations (EU) No 1229/2013 and (EU) No 350/2014)

(2023/C 278/12)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Rechtbank Noord-Holland

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: PR Pet BV

Defendant: Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Douane, kantoor Eindhoven

Operative part of the judgment

The Combined Nomenclature set out in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, as amended by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1821 of 6 October 2016,

must be interpreted as meaning that:

an article consisting in a structure, covered with different materials depending on the case, intended to give cats a place of their own which they can occupy, play in or scratch, referred to as a ‘cat scratching post’, does not fall under heading 9403 of that nomenclature. Such an article must be classified under the heading of that nomenclature corresponding to the material which, among those covering it, is present to the greatest degree, which it is for the referring court to determine. If those materials are present in equal proportions, that article should be classified under the heading which occurs last in numerical order among those which equally merit consideration.

---

(1)  OJ C 158, 11.4.2022.

---