alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8681 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to make fraudulent dealings in 

firearms and ammunition unlawful, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 23, 2020 

Ms. SCANLON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to make fraudulent 

dealings in firearms and ammunition unlawful, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stopping the Fraudu5 lent Sales of Firearms Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FRAUDULENT DEALINGS IN FIREARMS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 922(a) of title 18, United 

8 States Code, is amended— 

9 (1) in paragraph (9), by striking the period and 

10 at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8681 IH

1 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

2 ‘‘(10) for any person— 

3 ‘‘(A) to import, manufacture, or sell a fire4 arm or ammunition by means of false or fraud5 ulent pretenses, representations, or promises; 

6 and 

7 ‘‘(B) to transmit or cause to be trans8 mitted, by means of wire, radio, or television 

9 communication in interstate or foreign com10 merce, any communication relating to the im11 portation, manufacture, or sale described in 

12 subparagraph (A).’’. 

13 (b) PENALTY.—Section 924(a)(1)(B) of title 18, 

14 United States Code, is amended by inserting ‘‘(a)(10),’’ 

15 before ‘‘(f)’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
# C_2021329EN.01003401.xml

| 16.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 329/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 329/34

---

Action brought on 23 June 2021 — Plusmusic v EUIPO — Groupe Canal + (+music)

(Case T-344/21)

(2021/C 329/45)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Plusmusic AG (Dietikon, Suisse) (represented by: M. Maier and A. Spieß, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Groupe Canal + (Issy-les-Moulineaux, France)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark +music — Application for registration No 17 482 571

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 April 2021 in Case R 1236/2020-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | partially annul the contested decision insofar as it confirms the other party’s opposition on the basis of Article 8(1)(b) EURMR; |
| --- | --- |

—

partially annul the contested decision insofar as it confirms the other party’s opposition on the basis of Article 8(1)(b) EURMR;

| — | order EUIPO and the other party to bear their own costs and pay those of the Applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and the other party to bear their own costs and pay those of the Applicant.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council by erroneously assessing the visual comparison of the signs; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council by erroneously assessing the visual comparison of the signs;

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council by erroneously assessing the distinctiveness of the earlier cross device marks; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council by erroneously assessing the distinctiveness of the earlier cross device marks;

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council by erroneously assessing the likelihood of confusion. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council by erroneously assessing the likelihood of confusion.

---
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER REINSTATING APPEAL

Appellate case name: Robert Moore v. The State of Texas 

Appellate case numbers: 01-21-00012-CR

Trial court case numbers: 1672800

Trial court: 209th Judicial District Court of Harris County

This case was abated and remanded to the trial court to conduct a hearing to address a 

motion for withdrawal and for appointment of new counsel for Appellant. See TEX.R. APP. P. 43.6. 

A supplemental clerk’s record has been filed containing an order granting the withdrawal and an 

order appointing new counsel. Accordingly, the appeal is reinstated.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ____/s/ Sarah Beth Landau________________________

Acting individually 

Date: ___February 15, 2022___________________
# C_2021422EN.01003402.xml

| 18.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 422/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.10.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 422/34

---

Action brought on 2 September 2021 — Rochem Group v EUIPO — Rochem Marine (R.T.S. ROCHEM Technical Services)

(Case T-546/21)

(2021/C 422/45)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Rochem Group AG (Zug, Switzerland) (represented by: K. Guridi Sedlak, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Rochem Marine Srl (Genoa, Italy)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark R.T.S. ROCHEM Technical Services — European Union trade mark No 12 326 609

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 28 June 2021 in Case R 1544/2019-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | stay the proceeding until a final judgement has been taken in the proceeding before the court of Milan against the Italian trade mark 933481 ROCHEM MARINE (fig.); |
| --- | --- |

—

stay the proceeding until a final judgement has been taken in the proceeding before the court of Milan against the Italian trade mark 933481 ROCHEM MARINE (fig.);

| — | in the alternative, annul the contested decision, ordering that the Board of Appeal of the EUIPO renders a new decision, refusing the declaration of invalidation filed against the European Union trade mark registration No. 12 326 609 R.T.S. ROCHEM Technical Services (fig.) against the classes 11 and 40; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, annul the contested decision, ordering that the Board of Appeal of the EUIPO renders a new decision, refusing the declaration of invalidation filed against the European Union trade mark registration No. 12 326 609 R.T.S. ROCHEM Technical Services (fig.) against the classes 11 and 40;

| — | order EUIPO and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal, should the latter appear before the Court, to bear their own costs and the fees and costs of the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal, should the latter appear before the Court, to bear their own costs and the fees and costs of the applicant.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Articles 18 and 64(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Articles 18 and 64(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
2018 EAVS Data Brief: South Carolina EAVS Jurisdictions 



46 

Voter Registration 

Total Registered Voters, 

Nov. 20181 

3,538,580 

1 A1a of EAVS 

Registration Forms Received, 

E-Day 2016 – E-Day 20182 

1,435,340 

2 A3a of EAVS 

New Voters Registered, 

E-Day 2016 – E-Day 20183 

172,514 

3 A3b of EAVS 

Sources of Registration Forms4 

4 A4a-l of EAVS 

Mail/Fax/Email 328,431 

In-Person 244,489 

Online 120,082 

Motor Vehicle Office 688,261 

Public Assistance 

Office 44,505 

Disability Office 580 

Military Recruitment 

Office 663 

Other Non-NVRA 

Office 0 

Registration Drives 0 

Other Sources or Not 

Categorized 8,329 

 Voter Turnout 

Voters Participating by Mode5 

By Mail 

80,271 

5% 

In-Person Early 

In-Person E-Day 217,857 

1,432,727 13% 

82% 

Other Mode 

8,850 

0% 

5 In-person Election Day 

voters is F1b. By-mail voters 

is F1d+F1g. In-person early 

voters is F1f. Other mode is 

F1c+F1e+F1h. 

Total Turnout:6 1,739,705 

6 F1a of EAVS 

Provisional Voters:7 5,539 

7 F1e of EAVS 

UOCAVA Voters:8 3,311 

8 F1c of EAVS 

Election Technology 

Technology Used by Jurisdictions9 

46 46

0 0 0 

DRE w/o DRE with Ballot Scanner Hand Electronic 

VVPAT VVPAT Marking Count Poll Book 

Device 

46 



9 F3a-d, F5a-F8a, and 

F11a of EAVS 

Election Policies 

✔ Has online voter registration10 

10 Q6 of Policy Survey 

✔ Has a form of same-day voter registration (SDR)11 

11 Q7 of Policy Survey 

Has all-mail elections statewide12 

Has all-mail elections in certain jurisdictions12 

12 Q9a of Policy Survey 

Allows voters to register as permanent absentee 

voters13 

✔ 13 Q10 of Policy Survey Requires excuse for by-mail voting14 

✔ Requires excuse for in-person early or in-person 14 Q8 of Policy Survey 

absentee voting15 15 Q12a of Policy Survey 

Uses vote centers16 16 Q13 of Policy Survey 

Notes 

EAVS data and reports may be downloaded at 

www.eac.gov. 

Responses of “Does not apply” and “Data not available”

are shown as zeroes.
# C_2023035EN.01002002.xml

| 30.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 35/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 35/20

---

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 November 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Warszawy — Śródmieścia w Warszawie — Poland) — TD, SD v mBank S.A.

(Case C-138/22) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Unfair terms in consumer contracts - Mortgage loan agreement indexed to a foreign currency - Unfair terms - Invalidity of the contract on account of the inclusion of unfair or unlawful terms - Choice of the consumer - Interpretation of national law - Clear lack of jurisdiction)

(2023/C 35/23)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Rejonowy dla Warszawy — Śródmieścia w Warszawie

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: TD, SD

Defendant: mBank S.A.

Operative part of the order

The Court of Justice of the European Union manifestly lacks jurisdiction to answer the question referred for a preliminary ruling by the Sąd Rejonowy dla Warszawy — Śródmieścia w Warszawie (District Court of Warsaw-Śródmieście, Warsaw, Poland) by decision of 18 January 2022.

---

(1)  Date lodged: 25.2.2022.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8595 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8595

 To nullify the effect of Executive Order 13950 relating to combating 
                       race and sex stereotyping.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 16, 2020

 Mrs. Beatty (for herself, Mr. Danny K. Davis of Illinois, Ms. Lee of 
   California, Ms. Norton, Mr. Rush, Ms. Clark of Massachusetts, Mr. 
  Cohen, Ms. Johnson of Texas, Ms. Speier, Ms. Adams, Ms. Kaptur, Ms. 
  Wild, Mr. Foster, Ms. Plaskett, Mr. Raskin, Mr. Green of Texas, Ms. 
 Moore, Mr. Cooper, Ms. Wasserman Schultz, Mrs. Hayes, Mr. Johnson of 
Georgia, and Ms. Blunt Rochester) introduced the following bill; which 
was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform, and in addition 
  to the Committees on Education and Labor, and Armed Services, for a 
 period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To nullify the effect of Executive Order 13950 relating to combating 
                       race and sex stereotyping.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RECESSION.

    (a) In General.--The provisions of Executive Order 13950 (85 Fed. 
Reg. 60683; relating to combating race and sex stereotyping) are 
rescinded and shall have no force or effect.
    (b) Effective Date.--This Act shall take effect as if enacted on 
September 22, 2020.
                                 <all>
```
No. 11-7979.

No. 11-8655.

#### Whiteside *v.*Arkansas. Vargas Guillen *v.*California.

Sup. Ct. Ark. Reported below: 2011 Ark. 371, 383 S. W. 3d 859; and Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Motions of petitioners for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*granted. Certiorari granted, judgments vacated, and cases remanded for further consideration in light of *Miller*v. *Alabama, ante,*p. 460.
2018 EAVS Data Brief: California EAVS Jurisdictions 

58 

 

 

 

 Voter Registration 

Total Registered Voters, 

Nov. 20181 

25,103,559 

1 A1a of EAVS 

Registration Forms Received, 

E-Day 2016 – E-Day 20182 

8,572,410 

2 A3a of EAVS 

New Voters Registered, 

E-Day 2016 – E-Day 20183 

2,481,206 

3 A3b of EAVS 

Sources of Registration Forms4 

4 A4a-l of EAVS 

Mail/Fax/Email 1,049,437 

In-Person 513,285 

Online 3,530,619 

Motor Vehicle Office 1,932,780 

Public Assistance 

Office 77,183 

Disability Office 2,720 

Military Recruitment 

Office 4,626 

Other Non-NVRA 

Office 114,452 

Registration Drives 183,719 

Other Sources or 

Not Categorized 1,163,589 

 Voter Turnout 

Voters Participating by Mode5 

In-Person Early 

61,901 

0% By Mail 

9,507,472 Other Mode 69% 

959,926 

7% 

In-Person E-Day 

3,299,391 

24% 

5 In-person Election Day 

voters is F1b. By-mail voters 

is F1d+F1g. In-person early 

voters is F1f. Other mode is 

F1c+F1e+F1h. 

Total Turnout:6 13,828,680 

6 F1a of EAVS 

Provisional Voters:7 898,081 

7 F1e of EAVS 

UOCAVA Voters:8 47,310 

8 F1c of EAVS 

Election Technology 

Technology Used by Jurisdictions9 

53 

28 26 

3 0 

DRE w/o DRE with Ballot Scanner Hand Electronic 

VVPAT VVPAT Marking Count Poll Book 

9 

Device 



9 F3a-d, F5a-F8a, and 

F11a of EAVS 

Election Policies 

✔ Has online voter registration10 

10 Q6 of Policy Survey 

✔ Has a form of same-day voter registration (SDR)11 

11 Q7 of Policy Survey 

Has all-mail elections statewide12 

✔ Has all-mail elections in certain jurisdictions12 

12 Q9a of Policy Survey 

✔ Allows voters to register as permanent absentee 

voters13 

13 Q10 of Policy Survey Requires excuse for by-mail voting14 

Requires excuse for in-person early or in-person 14 Q8 of Policy Survey 

absentee voting15 15 Q12a of Policy Survey 

✔ Uses vote centers16 16 Q13 of Policy Survey 

Notes 

EAVS data and reports may be downloaded at 

www.eac.gov. 

Responses of “Does not apply” and “Data not available”

are shown as zeroes.
Distribution Statement A - Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

On the Web: www.dtra.mil

Media Contact: 1(703) 767-5870

For Immediate Release No. DTRA 2021-107

 October 26, 2021

Outpacing New Threats: New DTRA Strategy 2022-2027 keeps counter-WMD agency aligned with 

national, DoD priorities

By DTRA Public Affairs

FORT BELVOIR, Va. -- In keeping its missions, priorities and values aligned with the most recent higher-level guidance, the 

Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) has published the 2022-2027 Agency Strategy. 

The new document is a timely strategic blueprint that ensures DTRA addresses the challenges posed by weapons of mass destruction 

(WMD) and emerging threats. When referring to WMD, the Agency is specifically focused on nuclear, chemical, and/or biological 

weapons.

DTRA’s Acting Director Dr. Rhys Williams, Ph.D. approved the new strategy and shared it with the agency workforce by 

emphasizing how this document can keep all of the agency’s individual missions, projects and programs in synch with national 

priorities.

“As both a Defense Agency and a Combat Support Agency, DTRA plays a vitally important role to the services, the combatant 

commands, and many other DoD and interagency partners,” said Williams. “DTRA’s mission is complex and dynamic, in large part 

because of the multifaceted nature of WMD themselves. This strategic guidance is unclassified, so we can share it widely, not just 

within the U.S. government but with academia, industry and our international partners.”

The 2022-2027 DTRA Strategy highlights the administration’s theater, national, and multinational objectives. The strategy also 

focuses on DTRA’s core functions (DTRA’s unique instruments of national power); and aligns those unique instruments with four 

agency-level goals which are:

FUNCTIONS:

• DTRA Enables Strategic Deterrence

• DTRA Supports U.S. Treaty Implementation and 

Verification

• DTRA Partners to Reduce Global WMD Threats

• DTRA Identifies Vulnerabilities and Mitigation 

Strategies

• DTRA Develops and Delivers Rapid Capabilities

GOALS:

• Ensure a Safe, Secure, and Effective Nuclear Deterrent

• Counter Weapons of Mass Destruction and Emerging 

Threats

• Enable the Joint Force and Allies/Partners to Compete 

and Win Against Adversaries

• Build and Adaptive and Resilient Agency

“DTRA is already known as the pre-eminent counter-WMD agency within the U.S. government,” adds Williams. “This strategy will 

elevate our presence as we stand ready to support our warfighters, the interagency, and our international partners in their efforts to 

detect, deter, and defeat current and emerging WMD threats.”

You can find a copy of the DTRA Strategy 2022-2027 on the DTRA website here. For more information on DTRA’s mission and 

programs, visit www.dtra.mil.

Press Release

26 October 2021
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-05-00771-CV

Accromedia Group, Inc., Jim F. Faile, Dream Girls, Inc., E! Entertainment Television

International Holding, Inc., E! Networks, E! Entertainment Television,

and E! Online, Appellants

v.

Amber Kulhanek, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY, 22ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 01-0505, HONORABLE CHARLES R. RAMSAY, JUDGE PRESIDING 

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellants Accromedia Group, Inc., Jim F. Faile, Dream Girls, Inc., E!

Entertainment Television International Holding, Inc., E! Networks, E! Entertainment Television,

and E! Online and appellee Amber Kulhanek no longer wish to pursue this appeal and have filed

unopposed motions to dismiss the appeal. We grant the motions and dismiss the appeal. Tex.

R. App. P. 42.1(a).

__________________________________________

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Justices B.A. Smith, Pemberton and Waldrop

Dismissed on Appellants’ Motions

Filed: August 24, 2006
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8734 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8734

 To amend the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 to prohibit the 
 imposition of a nondisclosure agreement as a condition of the payment 
 of any award or settlement in connection with a violation of such Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 9, 2020

 Mr. Stewart introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 to prohibit the 
 imposition of a nondisclosure agreement as a condition of the payment 
 of any award or settlement in connection with a violation of such Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Victims' Voice and Transparency 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITING IMPOSITION OF NONDISCLOSURE AGREEMENT AS CONDITION 
              OF AWARD OR SETTLEMENT UNDER CONGRESSIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY 
              ACT OF 1995.

    (a) Prohibition.--Section 401 of the Congressional Accountability 
Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1401) is amended by adding at the end the 
following new subsection:
    ``(h) Prohibiting Imposition of Nondisclosure Agreements.--A 
nondisclosure agreement may not be imposed on any party as a condition 
of the payment of any award or settlement in connection with a 
violation of part A of title II.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to awards and settlements paid in connection with 
the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 on or after the date of 
the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2022064EN.01002901.xml

| 7.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 64/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 64/29

---

Action brought on 26 November 2021 — EMS Electro Medical Systems v EUIPO (AIRFLOW)

(Case T-751/21)

(2022/C 64/41)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: EMS Electro Medical Systems GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by: K. Scheib and C. Schulte, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the word mark AIRFLOW — Application for registration No 1 533 193

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 September 2021 in Case R 546/2021-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by EMS Electro Medical Systems GmbH. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by EMS Electro Medical Systems GmbH.

Pleas in law

| — | Incorrect interpretation of Articles 7(1)(c) and 7(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Incorrect interpretation of Articles 7(1)(c) and 7(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Incorrect interpretation of Articles 7(1)(b) and 7(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Incorrect interpretation of Articles 7(1)(b) and 7(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 75(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 75(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 76(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 76(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---