alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.10



 Exhibit 10.10 

THIS EXHIBIT HAS BEEN REDACTED AND IS THE SUBJECT OF A CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT 

REQUEST PURSUANT TO RULE 24b-2. REDACTED MATERIAL IS MARKED WITH [***] AND HAS 

BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. 

AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO 

CELLULOSE SPECIALTIES AGREEMENT 
 THIS
AMENDMENT is effective as of January 1, 2012, and is entered into by and between Nantong Cellulose Fibers Co., Ltd. (“Buyer”), and Rayonier Performance Fibers, LLC (“Seller”), collectively, the “Parties.” 

WHEREAS, Buyer and Seller entered into a Cellulose Specialties Agreement with an effective date of January 1, 2012 (the “Agreement”);

 WHEREAS, the Parties desire to amend the Agreement to revise the parties respective purchase and sales volumes obligations; 

WHEREAS, the Parties desire to revise certain business terms in the Agreement. 

NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby amend the Agreement as follows: 
  

	1.	Replace Article 3(a) in its entirety with the following: 

 (a) Buyer shall purchase and Rayonier
shall sell the following annual quantities: 
 2012 *** 

2013 *** 
 2014 *** 

Except as amended above, all remaining provisions of the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Amendment effective as of the day and year first above written. 

 
  

									
	NANTONG CELLULOSE FIBERS CO., LTD.	 		 	RAYONIER PERFORMANCE FIBERS, LLC
					
	By:	 	 /s/ Mao Jun
	 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Erin Byers

	Name: Mao Jun	 		 	Name: Erin Byers
	Title: Deputy Gen. Mgr. Administration	 		 	Title: VP Sales Market Research
	Date:     11    /    1    /    11    	 		 	Date:     11    /    1    /    11
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 46 (Monday, March 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 10868]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5773]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Human Genome Research Institute; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting:

    Agenda/Purpose: To consider the biological questions that can be 
addressed by analysis of human DNA sequence polymorphism and the 
technology required for such studies.
    Name of Committee: National Human Genome Research Institute, 
Special Emphasis Panel (M1).
    Date: March 31-April 1, 1997.
    Time: 8:30 am.
    Place: NIH, Natcher (Building 45), Room C1, 9000 Rockville Pike, 
Bethesda, Maryland.
    Contact Person: Mark Guyer, Ph.D., National Human Genome 
Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Building 38A, 
Room 604, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, (301) 402-5407.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.172, Human 
Genome Research.)

    Dated: March 4, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-5773 Filed 3-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
# C_2021452EN.01004602.xml

| 8.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 452/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 452/46

---

Action brought on 21 September 2021 — WP and Others v Commission

(Case T-604/21)

(2021/C 452/59)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: WP, WQ, WR (represented by: N. de Montigny, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the PMO.4 of 16 November 2020 rejecting the application lodged on 14 September 2020 in the name of the deceased to seek recovery of his national pension rights that were transferred to the EU pension scheme, together with any interest accrued on those rights for all those years, until repaid in full; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the PMO.4 of 16 November 2020 rejecting the application lodged on 14 September 2020 in the name of the deceased to seek recovery of his national pension rights that were transferred to the EU pension scheme, together with any interest accrued on those rights for all those years, until repaid in full;

| — | annul, in so far as necessary, the express decision of 15 June 2021 rejecting the complaint of 15 February 2021 lodged in the name of the deceased, whose continuation by the estate was notified on 25 May 2021; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul, in so far as necessary, the express decision of 15 June 2021 rejecting the complaint of 15 February 2021 lodged in the name of the deceased, whose continuation by the estate was notified on 25 May 2021;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants rely on two pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging that the defendant was unjustly enriched. |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging that the defendant was unjustly enriched.

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging infringement of the principle of equal treatment in that the application of the principle of unjust enrichment as affirmed by the case-law differs from the implementation of that principle by other institutions in otherwise identical situations. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging infringement of the principle of equal treatment in that the application of the principle of unjust enrichment as affirmed by the case-law differs from the implementation of that principle by other institutions in otherwise identical situations.

---
1 

### Addendum to the Technical Support Document

for the

Louisiana Regional Haze St ate Implementation Plan

Docket ID: EPA-R06-OAR-2008-0510

June 2012

Prepared by:

Ellen Belk Carrie Thomas

U.S. EPA Region 6, Dallas Texas2 

### Revised Table 10. ConocoPhillips Allia nce Refinery BART-Subject Units

EPN Description 5-factor analysis included? a De minimis emissions? a,b Included in CD? c Final Action?

308F-D-l Low Pressure Flare* Y D 308F-D-2 High Pressure Flare* Y D 301-B-2A CO Boiler Y D 301-B-2B CO Boiler Y D 191-H-1 Crude Charge Heater Y D

292-H-1 Light Distillate Gulfiner Reactor Heater Y A

292-H-2 Light Distillate Gulfiner Stabilizer Heater Y Y A

1291-H-2/3 FCCU Light/Heavy Feed Heater Y Y A 191-H-2 Vacuum Charge Heater Y Y A 891-H-1 Delayed Coker Charge Heater Y Y A 491-H-l Alkylation Isostripper Reboiler Y Y A 491-H-2 Alkylation Depropanizer Reboiler Y Y A 100-H-1 Coker Charge Storage Heater Y A

293-H-I Heavy Distillate Gulfiner Reactor Feed Heater Y Y A

293-H-2 Heavy Distillate Gulfiner Stabilizer Reboiler Y Y A

1391-H-1 Catalytic Reformer Feed Heater No. 1 Y Y A

l391-H-2/3 Catalytic Reformer Feed Heater Nos. 2&3 Y Y A

1391-H-4 Depentanizer Reboiler Y Y A 1391-H-5 Dry Reactivation Heater Y A 1791-H-1 Reformate Splitter Reboiler Y Y A I792-H-l Hydrodealkylation Charge Heater Y Y A 291-H-l Naphiner Reactor Feed Heater Y Y A 291-H-2 Naphiner Deisohexanizer Reboiler Y Y A 303-R-1 Cooling Water Tower No. 1 Y A 406-D-15 Product Dock No.1 MVR Loading** Y A 406-D-16 Product Dock No.2 MVR Loading** Y A 891-CP Coke Transfer and Storage Y A a Source: The LA RH SIP submittal, Appendix G; ConocoPhillips Report. b Source: See Appendix B to this TSD. c Source: Consent Decree and First and Second Amendmen ts to the Consent Decree, Civil Action No. H-05-0285, which are in the docket for this action. d “A” represents a proposed approval; “D” represents a proposed disapproval. *Appendix A of the First Amendment to the Consent Decree includes for Alliance “Low Pressure Flare (coker)” and “High Pressure Flare,” which may be the same as these units. **Appendix A of the First Amendment to the Consent De cree includes for Alliance “Marine Vapor Recovery Flare – 406 D-15” and “Marine Vapor Recovery Flare – 406 D-16.” However, the title for the units is shown as Product Dock No. 1 MVR Loading and Production Dock No. 2 MVR Loading in LA RH SIP Appendix G ConocoPhillips’ Appendix A table “List of BART-Eligible Units Included in BART Modeling.” It is unclear whether the CD addresses the subject to BART units identified by the same numbers.
MEMORANDUM

TO: Docket No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2014-0464

Air Quality Designations for the 2010 Primary Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) National 

Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) – Second Round

FROM: Scott Mathias

Air Quality Policy Division, EPA OAQPS

SUBJECT: EPA’s Intended Designation for Franklin County, Missouri for 2010 Primary SO2

NAAQS

On March 8, 2016, representatives from EPA and Senator Claire McCaskill’s office discussed 

via telephone the intended designation for Frankly County, Missouri for the 2010 Primary SO2

NAAQS. 

The following representatives were present:

Scott Mathias – EPA OAQPS

Richard “Chet” Wayland – EPA OAQPS

Sara Terry – EPA OAQPS

Amy Algoe-Eakin – EPA Region 7

Matthew Davis – EPA OCIR 

Patrick Bond – Office of Senator Claire McCaskill
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8911 

To amend the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation 

Act of 1996 to provide public benefits to citizens of the freely associated 

states, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 9, 2020 

Mr. CASE (for himself, Mr. WOMACK, Mr. SAN NICOLAS, Mrs. RADEWAGEN, 

Mr. SMITH of Washington, and Mr. SABLAN) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To amend the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity 

Reconciliation Act of 1996 to provide public benefits 

to citizens of the freely associated states, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Compact Impact Fair5 ness Act of 2020’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8911 IH

1 SEC. 2. PUBLIC BENEFITS FOR CITIZENS OF FREELY ASSO2 CIATED STATES. 

3 Section 431(b) of the Personal Responsibility and 

4 Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C. 

5 1641(b)) is amended— 

6 (1) in paragraph (6), by striking ‘‘or’’ at the 

7 end; 

8 (2) in paragraph (7), by striking the period at 

9 the end and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

10 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

11 ‘‘(8) a citizen of a freely associated state, if sec12 tion 141 of the applicable compact of free associa13 tion approved in Public Law 99–239 or 99–658 (or 

14 a successor provision) is in effect.’’. 

15 SEC. 3. APPLICATION. 

16 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subtitle D of title IV of the Per17 sonal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation 

18 Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C. 1641 et seq.) is amended by adding 

19 at the end the following: 

20 ‘‘SEC. 437. SPECIAL RULE FOR CITIZENS OF FREELY ASSO21 CIATED STATES. 

22 ‘‘In the case of an alien described in paragraph (8) 

23 of section 431(b), any otherwise applicable residency re24 quirement related to eligibility for benefits shall not 

25 apply.’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 8911 IH

1 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents 

2 for the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity 

3 Reconciliation Act of 1996 is amended by inserting after 

4 the item related to section 436 the following: 

‘‘437. Special rule for citizens of freely associated states.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****    - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский 

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

        - Student Loans
        - Grants
        - Laws
        - Data

# Statement from U.S. Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona on Sweet Settlement

# Statement from U.S. Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona on Sweet Settlement

June 22, 2022

**Contact:  **press@ed.gov

                                    -        
U.S. Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona issued the following statement regarding today’s filing on Sweet v. Cardona: 

“Since day one, the Biden-Harris Administration has worked to address longstanding issues relating to the borrower defense process. We are pleased to have worked with plaintiffs to reach an agreement that will deliver billions of dollars of automatic relief to approximately 200,000 borrowers and that we believe will resolve plaintiffs’ claims in a manner that is fair and equitable for all parties.” 
   -  Tags: Student Loan ProgramsBorrower DefensePress Releases
          How Do I Find...?    - Student loans, forgiveness
- Higher Education Rulemaking
- College accreditation
- Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
- FERPA
- FAFSA
- 1098, tax forms
- More...
      Information About...    - Elevating Teaching
- Early Learning
- Engage Every Student
- Unlocking Career Success
- Cybersecurity
Search press releasesSearch for:      Find By Month    - February 2024 
- January 2024 
- December 2023 
- November 2023 
- October 2023 
- September 2023 
- August 2023 
- July 2023 
- June 2023 
- May 2023 
- April 2023 
- March 2023 
- All Press Releases
             
*Our mission* is to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness by fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access.
- Student Loans
- Repaying Loans
- Defaulted Loans
- Loan Forgiveness
- Loan Servicers
- Grants & Programs
- Apply for Pell Grants
- Grants Forecast
- Apply for a Grant
- Laws & Guidance
- Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
- FERPA
- Civil Rights
- IDEA Website
- Data & Research
- Education Statistics
- Postsecondary Education Data
- ED Data Express
- Nation's Report Card
- What Works Clearinghouse
- Open Data Platform
- COVID Relief Data
- About Us
- Contact Us
- ED Offices
- Jobs
- Press Releases
- FAQs
- Recursos en español
- Budget, Performance
- Privacy Program
- Homeroom Blog
- Notices
- FOIA
- Privacy Policy
- Accessibility
- Security
- Information Quality
- Inspector General
- Whitehouse.gov
- USA.gov
- Benefits.gov
- Regulations.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         7,650
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,320
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         331,272
<DEPRECIATION>                                 89,824
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 313,687
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        228,559
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       8
<OTHER-SE>                                     13,728
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   313,687
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               36,445
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  19,963
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             12,845
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,878)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,288)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,590)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                2,255
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,335)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (1.67)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (1.67)



</TABLE>
# C_2022037EN.01003901.xml

| 24.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 37/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 37/39

---

Action brought on 25 October 2021 — NJ v Commission

(Case T-693/21)

(2022/C 37/52)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: NJ (represented by: C. Maczkovics, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare, in accordance with Article 265 TFEU, that the Commission unlawfully failed to act on its complaint of 19 April 2018 on State aid measure SA.50952(2018FC); |
| --- | --- |

—

declare, in accordance with Article 265 TFEU, that the Commission unlawfully failed to act on its complaint of 19 April 2018 on State aid measure SA.50952(2018FC);

| — | order the Commission to take a position on the complaint registered under number SA.50952(2018FC) without delay; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to take a position on the complaint registered under number SA.50952(2018FC) without delay;

| — | order the Commission to pay the whole costs, including those incurred by the applicant, even if, after the introduction of the present action, the Commission takes the measures that, according to the General Court, would make the action without object, or if the General Court rejects the application as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the whole costs, including those incurred by the applicant, even if, after the introduction of the present action, the Commission takes the measures that, according to the General Court, would make the action without object, or if the General Court rejects the application as inadmissible.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law, alleging that the Commission has violated its obligations under the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. In particular, it alleges the violation of Article 265 TFEU, as well as Article 12(1), second paragraph, of Regulation 2015/1589, (1) the requirement of diligent and impartial examination, the principle of sound administration and the principle of adoption of decisions in a reasonable time, because the Commission has not adopted any decision pursuant to Article 4(2), (3) or (4) of Regulation 2015/1589 more than three years and six months after the applicant lodged its complaint on State aid measure SA.50952(2018FC). The applicant argues that the Commission should have adopted such a decision within a period of twelve months, in conformity with its Code of Best Practice for the conduct of State aid control procedures, (2) or at least within a reasonable time.

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 of 13 July 2015 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (OJ 2015 L 248, p. 9).

(2)  Code of Best Practice for the conduct of State aid control procedures (OJ 2009 C 136, p. 13).

---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8839 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8839

  To direct the Secretary of Labor to fund youth workforce investment 
      activities for certain local areas, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 2, 2020

   Mr. Rush introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To direct the Secretary of Labor to fund youth workforce investment 
      activities for certain local areas, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Jobs Now Youth Employment Act''.

SEC. 2. YOUTH WORKFORCE INVESTMENT ACTIVITIES.

    (a) In General.--From the amount made available under subsection 
(e) for a fiscal year, the Secretary shall make allotments to local 
areas pursuant to subsection (b) for youth workforce investment 
activities under section 129 of the Workforce Innovation and 
Opportunity Act (29 U.S.C. 3164).
    (b) Formula.--The allotment to a local area under subsection (a) 
shall be made on the basis of the relative number of long-term 
unemployed individuals in each local area, compared to the total number 
of long-term unemployed individuals in all local areas.
    (c) Data Collection.--In carrying out subsection (a), the Secretary 
shall--
            (1) beginning not later than 180 days after the date of the 
        enactment of this Act and annually thereafter, the Secretary 
        shall collect long-term unemployment rates for local areas; and
            (2) identify local areas that have long-term unemployment 
        rates above the national average for the year for which such 
        data is collected.
    (d) Definition.--In this section:
            (1) Local area.--The term ``local area'' has the meaning 
        given such term under section 3 of the Workforce Innovation and 
        Opportunity Act (29 U.S.C. 3102).
            (2) Long-term unemployment.--The term ``long-term 
        unemployment'', used with respect to a local area, means the 
        number of individuals in such local area who have been 
        unemployed for 15 weeks or more.
            (3) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary 
        of Labor.
    (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out the activities described in subsection (a) 
$10,000,000,000 for each year in the 10-year period beginning on the 
date that is the first fiscal year that commences following the 
existence of data collected under subsection (c).
                                 <all>
```