September 28, 2016 STATE OF MINNESOTA

IN SUPREME COURT AlS-1877
In rePetition for Disciplinary Action against Scott Alan Becker. a Minnesota Attorney. Registration No. 0248253.
ORDER 

# ,-

By an order dated July 20. 2016. we suspended respondent Scott Alan Beckerfrom the practice oflaw for a minimum of60 days, effective August 3. 2016. Respondent has filed an atlidavit seeking reinstatement in which he states that he has fully complied with the terms of the suspension order. except for successful completion of the written examination required for admission to the practice of law by the State Board of Law Examiners on the subject of professional responsibility. The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility does not oppose the request. Based upon all the tiles. records. and proceedings herein. IT IS HEREBY ORDEREDTHAT: 1. Effective October 2. 20 16. respondent Scott Alan Becker is conditionally reinstated to the practice of law in the State of Minnesota. subject to his successful completion ofthe written examination required for admission to the practice oflaw by the State Board ofLaw Examiners on the subject ofprofessional responsibility. and is placed
on disciplinary probation for 2 years, subject to the following conditions:(a) Respondent shall cooperate fully with the Director's Office in its efforts to monitor compliance with this probation. Respondent shall promptly respond to the Director's correspondence by its due date. Respondent shall provide the Director with a current mailing address and shall immediately notify the Directorofany change ofaddress. Respondent shall cooperate with the Director's investigation of any allegations of unprofessional conduct that may cometo the Director's attention. Upon the Director's request respondent shall provide authorization for release of information and documentation to verify respondent's compliance with the terms ofthis probation. (b) Respondent shall abide by the Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct. (c) Respondent shallbe supervisedbya lawyerwiththe Director's Office who will monitorrespondent's compliance with the terms ofthis probation. (d) Respondent shall cooperate fully ·with the supervisorin theireffortsto monitor compliance with this probation. (e) On a quarterly basis, respondent shall anirmatively report to the Directorthe status ofhis efforts to resolve the claims ofthe heirs ofRichard Linde. After 1year, ifthe claims ofthe heirs have been resolved, respondent may request early termination ofthe probation. Ifthe Director agrees. the parties may tile a request for termination ofprobation with the court. By July 20, 2017, respondent shall comply with Rule 18(e)(3), Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR). by filing with the Clerk ofthe Appellate Courts and serving upon the Director proofofrespondent's successful completion ofthe written examination required for admission to the practice oflmv by the State Board of Law Examiners on the subject ofprofessional responsibility. Failure to do so shall result in automatic re-suspension pending proof of successful completion ofthe examination, pursuantto Rule 18(e)(3), RLPR.

2

### Dated: September 28, 2016

Associate 

### Justice

3