alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 12, 2016

No. 04-16-00203-CV

WALKER SCHMIDT and Schmidt Land Services, Inc.,

Appellants

v.

Casie ASHWORTH a/k/a Casie Watkins,

Appellee

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-CI-03339

Honorable Michael E. Mery, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The trial court clerk has filed a notification of late record, stating that she is unable to file 

the clerk’s record on time and requesting an extension of time to file the clerk’s record. The 

request for an extension is GRANTED. The clerk’s record is due on or before April 28, 2016.

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 12th day of April, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
# C_2023189EN.01000401.xml

| 30.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 189/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 189/4

---

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 April 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Zemgales rajona tiesa — Latvia) — SIA ‘Sinda & V R’ v Rīgas domes Satiksmes departaments

(Case C-619/22, (1) Sinda & V R)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Requirement to provide the legislative context of the dispute in the main proceedings - Requirement to set out the relationship between the provisions of European Union law of which an interpretation is sought and the applicable national legislation - Lack of sufficient information - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2023/C 189/04)

Language of the case: Latvian

Referring court

Zemgales rajona tiesa

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: SIA ‘Sinda & V R’

Defendant: Rīgas domes Satiksmes departaments

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Zemgales rajona tiesa (District Court, Zemgale, Latvia), by decision of 20 September 2022, is manifestly inadmissible.

---

(1)  Date lodged: 27.9.2022.

---
<Page>


                                                                     EXHIBIT 32b

        Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18
                            of the United States Code

     I, Thomas M. O'Flynn, Chief Financial Officer of Public Service Enterprise
Group Incorporated, to the best of my knowledge, certify that (i) the Annual
Report of Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Public Service Enterprise
Group Incorporated.

                                    /s/ Thomas M. O'Flynn
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Thomas M. O'Flynn
                                    Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated
                                    Chief Financial Officer
                                    February 28, 2005
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 11159 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
AARON CLAYTON MCVEA , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 1:18

- CR

- 11

- 1

Before DAVIS, GRAVES, and HO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Aaron Clayton McVea pleaded guilty to one count of possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, and the district court sentenced him within the applicable guidelines range to 125 months in prison, to be followed by a three

- year term of supervised release. On appeal, McVea argues that his
within

- guidelines sentence is substantively unreasonable because U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1 was not formulated using empirical evidence with respect to

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 3, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-11159 Document: 00514900686 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/03/2019No. 18

- 11159

2 methamphetamine offenses. The Government moves for summary affirmance, asserting that the issue is foreclosed by circuit precedent, as McVea has recognized. Alternatively, the Government moves for an extension of time to file an appellate brief. We ha ve held that Kimbrough v. United States , 552 U.S. 85, 109

- 10 (2007), does not disturb the presumption of reasonableness for guidelines sentences even if the relevant Guideline is not empirically based. See United States v. Duarte , 569 F.3d 528, 530

- 31 (5th Cir. 2009); United States v. Mondragon

- Santiago , 564 F.3d 357, 366

- 67 ( 5th Cir. 2009). Accordingly, the Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. The Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file an appellate brief is DENIED as moot

. Case: 18-11159 Document: 00514900686 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/03/2019
# C_2022024EN.01004801.xml

| 17.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/48

---

Action brought on 12 November 2021 — Łosowski v EUIPO — Skawiński (KOMBI)

(Case T-730/21)

(2022/C 24/62)

Language in which the application was lodged: Polish

Parties

Applicant: Sławomir Łosowski (Gdańsk, Poland) (represented by: K. Czub, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Grzegorz Skawiński (Sopot, Poland)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘KOMBI’ — EU trade mark No 12 534 491

Procedure before EUIPO: Invalidity proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 September 2021 in Case R 381/2017-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO and Grzegorz Skawiński to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and Grzegorz Skawiński to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
#### COM. v. FLOURNEY, C.

253 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/22/2017

CP-51-CR-0004164-2008

(Philadelphia)

Affirmed
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### November 25, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice



### 137098 Michael F. Cavanag h Elizabeth A. Weave r Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, 

### Plaintiff-Appellee, J ustices



### v SC: 137098 COA: 278797 Oakland CC: 07-212591-FC LEEATRICE DEMAR WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 22, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

1117 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 25, 2008

Clerk
### Wehlin

, 

### Jefferson From: Ungvarsky, John Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 9:42 AM To: Wehling, Jefferson Subject: RE: Feather River Rule 3.19 Attachments: 1H2_2013_Revised_2009_SIP-Appendicies.pdf; IH1_2013_Revised_2009_SIP.pdf



### Hi Jeff— Rule 3.19 is currently not in the SIP. The original version (adopted on 

### 8/6/98) is not in the SIP. The amended version from 2011 provides a <0.1 tpd reduction. Both the 1998 and 2011 reductions have already be credited in the baseline. I asked FRAQMD to submit Rule 3.19 for inclusion in the SIP to help bring its rules in line with the baseline in the plan. My hard copies ofthe plans and appendices have been boxed for placement in common space in our pending swing space. The box is still on ourfloor, and I can show itto you ifyou want to take a look. I’ve attached copies ofthe most-recentversions ofthe plan and appendices. John Ungvarsky Environmental Scientist USEPA, Region 9 75 Hawthorne St. (AIR-2) San Francisco, CA94105 415-972-3963 510-667-9743 (alternate worksite) From: Wehling, Jefferson Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 9:17 AM To: Ungvarsky, John V Subject: RE: Feather River Rule 3.19 Thanks, John. I still don’t understand howthis rule figures into the ozone planning process. The version we are taking action on was amended in August 2011, so I’m not sure whetherthe emissions reductions from the amended version are in the baseline inventorythatwe recently approved, orwhethertheyare separate, and whetheradditional reductions from furtheramendments to the rule may be forthcoming after2016. I think it might help ifI could look through the various documents that comprise the 8-hourozone attainment plan forSacramento Metro. I think it included a numberof plans and related appendices. I recall thatyou had a stackofthese documents once. Doyou still have them? Could I come up and borrowthem fora briefwhile? Thanks.
From: Ungvarsky, John Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 9:02 AM To: Wehling, Jefferson Subject: Feather River Rule 3.19 Hi Jeff— FRAQMD Rule 3.19 is in the Sacramento ozone plan thatwe recently approved, but it is in the form ofa commitment with an adoption year of2016. The VOC reductions (i.e., <0.1 tpd) are not relied on for
1

### attainmentor RFP. 

### I’ve attached what is said about 3.19 in the Control Measure and RACM analyses in the plan appendices.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATE STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS EXTRACTED
FROM ITEM 1 OF 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1998, FOR THE YEAR-TO-DATE,
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,553
<SECURITIES>                                    20,931
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                23,970
<PP&E>                                          11,101
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,572
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  30,453
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,223
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            57
<OTHER-SE>                                      27,173
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    27,230
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,311
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,260
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,949)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,949)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,949)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.35)
        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 30, 2016

s1121 

# Order

Clerk November 30, 2016

151627

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 151627

COA: 325543

Menominee CC: 11

- 003384

- FH;

11

- 003385

- FH

RICHARD WILLIAM JACQUES

, Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 4 , 2015 order of

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to

meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
No. 11-10484.

#### Frazier *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 19-1216 September Term, 2019

EPA-08/09/2019 Decision

Filed On: 

In re: Sealed Case,

BEFORE: Tatel, Millett, and Pillard, Circuit Judges

UNDER SEAL OPINION

NOT AVAILABLE TO PUBLIC
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          11,010
<SECURITIES>                                     2,170
<RECEIVABLES>                                  111,341
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,603)
<INVENTORY>                                     87,993
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               228,864
<PP&E>                                         185,822
<DEPRECIATION>                                  80,236
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 400,008
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           89,748
<BONDS>                                         83,233
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           245
<OTHER-SE>                                     184,205
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   400,008
<SALES>                                        362,556
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               362,556
<CGS>                                          224,260
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  224,260
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               101,528
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   216
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,218
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 31,334
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,594
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             19,740
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    19,740
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .81
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .81
        

</TABLE>
-78.5 -78.0 -77.5 -77.0 -76.5 -76.0

 38.5

 39.0

 39.5

★▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

08/22

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 22 Aug 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.86 N 77.06 W Meters AGL
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995             DEC-31-1994
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995             JAN-01-1994
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995             SEP-30-1994
<CASH>                                           3,621                   1,628
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,802                  16,864
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,142                   2,066
<INVENTORY>                                      2,529                   3,650
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                36,943                  31,976
<PP&E>                                          31,268                  30,786
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,161                  10,454
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  68,342                  62,860
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,799                  21,314
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<COMMON>                                         3,867                   3,867
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    68,342                  62,860
<SALES>                                         72,603                  45,929
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                72,603                  45,929
<CGS>                                           71,260                  45,408
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   76,928                  49,397
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,150                     250
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (5,245)                 (3,037)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,245)                 (3,037)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.14)                   (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.14)                   (.08)
        

</TABLE>
e h;hpi 

g;kpe 

k;eoi 

ʜalloVUʑoWnVed 

fl 

gk 

e 

ih 

ʜalloVUejecVed 

IʑONIN 

M#'#& 

&.#)(/R!#.,, 

OȨ

I(.,(.

!MV 

P/&#˽ #.(

OȨ

!##&#.# ˽!(3 

M#&#.,3 

R,/#.'(.OȨ 

O. ,S..˽!(3 R!#.,.#)(!,#0

R!#.,.#)(O. , 

194440 

378001 

73423 

1990 

0000 12 

3078 

egiUVTaVion#oTmoWTce 

oValegiUVeTedoVeTU 

˴ˆ˸˷˹ˆ˴˸˴ 

ecVionʛToVeTegiUVTaVion 

RgistrtionFormsRi; 

˷˶˱ˆ˺˵˵ 

ʑon˄TmaVionNoVi˄caVionUenV 

˱ 

P)&&#(! 

P& 

UO˳˽V˽ ˽(. P,)0##)(& 

ˏ&&). 

,&3V). 

˳(., 

V).3 

M#& 

T/,()/. 

O.,

2155994 

138542 

680788 

6084 72 0 11520 

ecVion#TWTnoWVb[MeVhod 

˳)/(.#/&& ˳)/(. 

P,. 

R$. P,)0##)(& 

O.,

152 

600 

0 0 

StionEɣro;isionlɛllots 

U(#),'S,0# 

N)('#&#.,3O0,

O., 

ecVionʜTOʑʛʛ 

˵ˆ˷˹˷ 

˵ˆ˶˸˴ 

˱ 

˺ˆ˳˶˺ 

ʜalloVUTanUmiVVed 

OʛL OʛL 

PToXiUionalʜalloVoVal<ljg WTnoWVoVal<g;pph;eee 

Sltˇ  SɐS 

OʛL 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 	 	 --- - -

- -

- - -

gefk"ʛ!aVaʜTief
	

U ' 

"

" - '-

"

- "

"

- - - "

" "
U. S. ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION 

 1225 New York Avenue, NW, Suite 1100 

 Washington, DC. 20005

Facilitating UOCAVA Voting Conference - Agenda 

 

Monday, September 24, 2007

First Floor Conference Room 

University of California, Washington Center 

1608 Rhode Island Ave. NW 

Washington, DC 20036 

___________________________________________________________________ 

8:00 – 8:30: Continental Breakfast Buffet 

Welcome, Introduction and Presentation of Research Findings 

• Time: 8:30 – 9:10

Speaker: Donetta Davidson, Chair, U.S. Election Assistance Commission 

 Opening Remarks and Welcome 

Speakers: Karin Mac Donald and Bruce E. Cain, Q2

 Data & Research LLC

 Topic: Presentation of findings from the UOCAVA Voter Survey and Case Studies 

Speaker: Kimball W. Brace, President, Election Data Services Inc. 

 Topic: Presentation of key findings of EAC UOCAVA Report 

Working Session 1 - State Laws and UOCAVA Voting 

 Time: 9:10 - 10:45 AM 

 Facilitated discussion with primary involvement of state election officials 

 Facilitator: Leslie Reynolds, Executive Director, National Association of Secretaries Of 

State 

 Session Objective: Participants will determine what types of state laws are needed to 

move forward with better facilitation of UOCAVA voting, through technology and other 

means. 

Break 10:45-11:00 
Working Session 2 - Local Implementation of UOCAVA: Successes and 

Challenges

 Time: 11:00 AM - 12:30 PM 

 Facilitated discussion with primary involvement of local election officials 

 Facilitator: Ann McGeehan, Director of Elections, Office of the Secretary of State, State 

of Texas 

 Session Objective: Participants will identify primarily non-technical implementation 

issues related to UOCAVA voting, practices that work, and resources needed. 

Break 12:30- 1:00 (opportunity for guests to obtain lunch off-site; participants can begin 

served lunch)

Luncheon Session 

 Time: 1:00 - 1:45 PM

 Speaker: TBA

Working Session 3 - UOCAVA and Technology: the overall picture

 Time: 2:00 - 3:30 PM

 Facilitation discussion with primary involvement of technologists and consultants 

 Facilitator: Mark Skall, Chief of the Software Diagnostics and Conformance Testing 

Division (SDCT), National Institute of Standards and Technology 

 Session Objective: Participants will discuss technology, security, and authentication 

issues and current viable solutions. 

Break: 3:30-3:45 

Working Session 4 - Technology: implementation details at the state and 

local level 

 Time 3:45 - 5:15 PM 

 Facilitated technology discussion with staff from state and local jurisdictions 

 Facilitator: Doug Chapin, Director, electionline.org 

 Session Objective: Participants will discuss challenges and resource needs with respect 

to applying technology to UOCAVA voting processes, especially implementation of 

electronic transmission of voting materials (registrations, ballot requests, blank and voted 

ballots).

Concluding Remarks 

 Time: 5:15 - 5:45 PM 

 Speakers: Bruce E. Cain/Q2

 and Donetta Davidson/EAC 

5:45 - 6:30 Informal wrap-up