alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
2022 EAVS Data Brief: United States EAVS Jurisdictions:

6,460 

 Voter Registration 

Active Reg. Voters as of Nov. 8, 20221 

203,660,564 

Reg. Forms Received2* 

80,764,222 

Total Confirmation Notices Sent3* 

26,601,983 

Voters Removed from Reg. Rolls4* 

19,260,000 

Source of Registration Applications5 

Motor Vehicle Dept. 55.0% 

Other 14.4% 

Online 14.0% 

Mail, Email, Fax 9.1% 

In Person 5.9% 

 Voting and Turnout 

Voters Participating By Mode6 

7 Turnout 

46.8% 

In-Person 

Election Day 

50,860,863 

49.0% 

Mail 

35,316,617

31.9% 

In-Person 

Early 

21,322,200

22.2% 

Other 

2,978,965 

2.7% 

Total Voting Locations8: 94,793 

Total Poll Workers9: 645,219 

Election Technology 

Percentage of Jurisdictions Using...10 

88.4% 

Ballot 

Marking 

Devices 

86.2% 

Scanners 

35.1% 

Electronic

Poll 

Books 

17.8% 

 Hand 

Counting 

6.7% 

DREs w/o 

VVPAT 

5.5% 

DREs with 

VVPAT 

 Mail Ballots 

• 61,460,139 mail ballots transmitted11 

• 59.7% of transmitted mail ballots returned by voters12 

• 97.4% of returned mail ballots counted13 

• 1.5% of returned mail ballots rejected14 

 Election Audits15 

53 States conducted logic and accuracy testing 

42 States conducted post-election tabulation audits 

26 States conducted ballot reconciliation audits 

12 States conducted other audits 

9 States conducted compliance/procedural audits 

6 States conducted access audits 

6 States conducted eligibility audits 

2 States conducted legal audits 

1 State conducted ballot design audit 

Notes 

EAVS data and reports may be downloaded at www.eac.gov 

/research-and-data/datasets-codebooks-and-surveys. 

Responses of “Does not apply,” “Data not available,” and “Valid 

skip” are shown as zeroes or dashes. Percentages may not sum 

to 100% because of missing data or rounding. 

* Close of registration for 2020 

general election to close of 

registration for 2022 general 

election. 

9 D7a of EAVS. 

10 F3a–f, F5a–F9a of EAVS;

number of jurisdictions that 

responded “Yes” divided by

number of jurisdictions in 

state/territory. 

1 A1b of EAVS. 

2 A3a of EAVS. 

3 A8a of EAVS 11 C1a of EAVS. . 

4 A9a of EAVS. 12 C1b/C1a of EAVS. 

5 Mail, Email, Fax is A4a/A3a. 

In Person is A4b/A3a. Online is 

A4c/A3a. Motor Vehicle Dept. is 

A4d/A3a. Other is the sum of 

A4e–A4l/A3a. May not sum to 

100% because of missing data. 

6 In-Person Election Day is F1b. 

Mail is F1d+F1g. In-Person Early 

is F1f. Other is F1c+F1e+F1h. 

7 F1a of EAVS divided by citizen 

voting age population (CVAP). 

8 D2a of EAVS. 

13 C8a/C1b of EAVS. 

14 C9a/C1b of EAVS. 

15 Q36 of Policy Survey. See 

survey questionnaire for full 

definitions of each type of 

audit.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63**

**of Title 18 of the United States Code**

 

I, Richard F. Dauch, President and Chief Executive Officer of Accuride Corporation, certify that to my knowledge, (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for said period fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Accuride Corporation.

 
| /s/ RICHARD F. DAUCH                  |   | Dated: | May   6, 2011 |
|---------------------------------------|--------|--------|---------------|
| Richard F. Dauch                      |   |   |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |   |   |

 

 

I, James H. Woodward, Jr., Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Accuride Corporation, certify that to my knowledge, (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for said period fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Accuride Corporation.

 
| /s/ JAMES H. WOODWARD, Jr.                    |   | Dated: | May   6, 2011 |
|-----------------------------------------------|--------|--------|---------------|
| James H. Woodward, Jr.                        |   |   |
| Senior Vice President Chief Financial Officer |   |   |

 

1

----
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8862 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8862

             To reauthorize the Pregnancy Assistance Fund.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 3, 2020

  Ms. Spanberger (for herself and Mr. Cole) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
             To reauthorize the Pregnancy Assistance Fund.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Pregnancy Assistance Act of 2020''.

SEC. 2. PREGNANCY ASSISTANCE FUND.

    Section 10214 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (42 
U.S.C. 18204) is amended by striking ``2010 through 2019'' and 
inserting ``2021 through 2025''.
                                 <all>
```
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 4731** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. CHARLES RICHARD BURKE, a/k/a Rick, a/k/a “ D ” , a/k/a Detroit Rick, a/k/a Hasim Coleman, a/k/a Rick Calloway, a/k/a Jihad Alexander , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia , at Huntington

. Robert C. Chambers , District Judge. ( 3:10

- cr - 00224

- 1 )

Submitted : May 17, 2013 Decided: June 6, 2013

Before DAVIS, WYNN, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Michael D. Payne, REDMAN & PAYNE, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant. R. Booth Goodwin II, United States Attorney, R . Gregory McVey, Assistant United States Attorney, Huntington, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Charles Richard Burke appeals his sentence of 236 months of imprisonment following his guilty plea to conspiracy to distribute oxycodone and 280 grams or more of cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (2006) . Burke contends that the district court erred in determining that his prior state and federal felony drug convictions are s eparate sentence s under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual (“USSG”) § 4A1.2(a)(2) (201 1 ), and, consequently, incorrectly classified him as a career offender under USSG § 4B1.1 (a). We affirm. In assessing a challenge to the district court’s application of the Guidelines, we review the district court’s factual findings for clear error and its legal conclusions de

novo. United States v. Perez , 609 F.3d 609, 612 (4th Ci r. 2010).
Pursuant to USSG § 4A1.2(a)(2) , “[p]rior sentences always are counted separately if the sentences were imposed for offenses that were separated by an intervening arrest

. . . .” USSG § 4A1.2(a)(2). In the absence of an intervening arrest , “prior sentences are counted separately unless (A) the sentences resulted from offens es contained in the same charging instrument; or (B) the sentences were imposed on the same day.” Id. Accordingly, where a defendant , like Burke , has been sentenced on different days for federal and state crimes charged3 in separate indictments, those con victions are properly counted

as separate sentence s under § 4B1.1. See U nited States v. Rooks , 596 F.3d 204, 212

- 13 (4th Cir. 2010) ( explaining that defendant’s state and federal convictions, for which he was indicted and sentenced separately, should be c ounted as separate offense s despite the fact that they arose from the same course of criminal conduct)

. We therefore find no error in Burke’s classification as a career offender and affirm his sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 46 (Monday, March 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 10892]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5849]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary
[Docket OST-96-1334]


Application of Arriva Air International, Inc. for Certificate 
Authority

AGENCY: Department of Transportation.

ACTION: Notice of order to show cause (Order 97-3-4 ).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Transportation is directing all interested 
persons to show cause why it should not issue an order finding Arriva 
Air International, Inc., fit, willing, and able, and awarding it a 
certificate of public convenience and necessity to engage in interstate 
charter air transportation of property and mail.

DATES: Persons wishing to file objections should do so no later than 
March 19, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Objections and answers to objections should be filed in 
Docket OST-96-1334 and addressed to the Department of Transportation 
Dockets (SVC-120.30, Room PL-401), U.S. Department of Transportation, 
400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590, and should be served 
upon the parties listed in Attachment A to the order.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Delores King, Air Carrier Fitness 
Division (X-56, Room 6401), U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 
Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590, (202) 366-2343.

    Dated: March 4, 1997.
Patrick V. Murphy,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs.
[FR Doc. 97-5849 Filed 3-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CertificationPursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63**

**of Title 18 of the United States Code**

 

I,William M. Lasky, President and Chief Executive Officer of AccurideCorporation, certify that to my knowledge, (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the period ended June 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) theinformation contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for said periodfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of Accuride Corporation.

 
| /s/  WILLIAM M. LASKY                  |   | Dated: | August  6, 2010 |
|----------------------------------------|--------|--------|-----------------|
| William  M. Lasky                      |   |
| President  and Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

 

I,James H. Woodward, Jr., Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer ofAccuride Corporation, certify that to my knowledge, (i) the Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934and (ii) the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q forsaid period fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of Accuride Corporation.

 
| /s/ JAMES H. WOODWARD, Jr.                    |   | Dated: | August  6, 2010 |
|-----------------------------------------------|--------|--------|-----------------|
| James H. Woodward, Jr.                        |   |   |            |
| Senior Vice President Chief Financial Officer |   |   |            |

 

----
2018 EAVS Data Brief: U.S. Virgin Islands EAVS Jurisdictions 

1 

 Voter Registration 

Total Registered Voters, 

Nov. 20181 

51,095 

1 A1a of EAVS 

Registration Forms Received, 

E-Day 2016 – E-Day 20182 

4,018 

2 A3a of EAVS 

New Voters Registered, 

E-Day 2016 – E-Day 20183 

4,018 

3 A3b of EAVS 

Sources of Registration Forms4 

4 A4a-l of EAVS 

Mail/Fax/Email 0 

In-Person 0 

Online 0 

Motor Vehicle Office 0 

Public Assistance 

Office 0 

Disability Office 0 

Military Recruitment 

Office 0 

Other Non-NVRA Office 0 

Registration Drives 0 

Other Sources or Not 

Categorized 4,018 

 Voter Turnout 

Voters Participating by Mode5 

By Mail 

908 

3% 

In-Person Early 

3,952 In-Person E-Day 15% 21,236 

81% 

Other Mode 

250 

1% 

5 In-person Election Day 

voters is F1b. By-mail voters 

is F1d+F1g. In-person early 

voters is F1f. Other mode is 

F1c+F1e+F1h. 

Total Turnout:6 26,346 

6 F1a of EAVS 

Provisional Voters:7 242 

7 F1e of EAVS 

UOCAVA Voters:8 8 

8 F1c of EAVS 

Election Technology 

Technology Used by Jurisdictions9 

1 1 

DRE w/o DRE with Ballot Scanner Hand Electronic 

0 0 0 

VVPAT VVPAT Marking Count Poll Book 

Device 

1 



9 F3a-d, F5a-F8a, and 

F11a of EAVS 

Election Policies 

Has online voter registration10 

10 Q6 of Policy Survey 

Has a form of same-day voter registration (SDR)11 

11 Q7 of Policy Survey 

Has all-mail elections statewide12 

Has all-mail elections in certain jurisdictions12 

12 Q9a of Policy Survey 

✔ Allows voters to register as permanent absentee 

voters13 

✔ 13 Q10 of Policy Survey Requires excuse for by-mail voting14 

Requires excuse for in-person early or in-person 14 Q8 of Policy Survey 

absentee voting15 15 Q12a of Policy Survey 

Uses vote centers16 16 Q13 of Policy Survey 

Notes 

EAVS data and reports may be downloaded at 

www.eac.gov. 

Responses of “Does not apply” and “Data not available”

are shown as zeroes.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 41 (Monday, March 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 9421]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5099]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. CP97-261-000]


Northwest Pipeline Corporation; Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

February 25, 1997.
    Take notice that on February 21, 1997, Northwest Pipeline 
Corporation (Northwest), 295 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, Utah 84108, 
filed a request with the Commission in Docket No. CP97-261-000, 
pursuant to Sections 157.205, and 157.211 of the Commission's 
Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (NGA) for authorization to 
operate existing delivery point facilities for delivery of natural gas 
directly to Ash Grove Cement Company (Ash Grove) instead of 
Intermountain Gas Company (Intermountain) authorized in blanket 
certificate issued in Docket No. CP82-433-000, all as more fully set 
forth in the request on file with the Commission and open to public 
inspection.
    Northwest proposes to operate the existing Idaho Portland Cement 
delivery point facilities for transportation deliveries directly to Ash 
Grove, an end-user, instead of to Intermountain, a local distribution 
company, that is currently serving Ash Grove.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after the 
Commission has issued this notice, file pursuant to Rule 214 of the 
Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to intervene or 
notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of the 
Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to the request. If 
no protest is filed within the allowed time, the proposed activity 
shall be deemed to be authorized effective the day after the time 
allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed and not withdrawn 
within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a protest, the instant 
request shall be treated as an application for authorization pursuant 
to Section 7 of the NGA.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-5099 Filed 2-28-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# C_2022418EN.01003501.xml

| 31.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 418/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 418/35

---

Judgment of the General Court of 7 September 2022 — Olimp Laboratories v EUIPO (VITA-MIN MULTIPLE SPORT)

(Case T-9/22) (1)

(European Union trade mark - Application for the European Union word mark VITA-MIN MULTIPLE SPORT - Absolute grounds for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Lack of distinctive character acquired through use - Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001)

(2022/C 418/47)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Applicant: Olimp Laboratories sp. z o.o. (Dębica, Poland) (represented by: M. Kondrat, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment and reversal of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 8 November 2021 (Case R 771/2020-1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Olimp Laboratories sp. z o.o. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Olimp Laboratories sp. z o.o. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 84, 21.2.2022.

---
PROMISSORY
NOTE


 


	Principal Amount: $200,000	Issue Date: January 24, 2014


  


FOR
VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, NaturalNano, Inc., a Nevada corporation, maintaining an address at 763 Linden Ave., Rochester,
NY 14625 (“Debtor”), promises to pay to the order of Alpha Capital Anstalt, Pradafant 7, 9490 Furstentums, Vaduz, Lichtenstein,
Fax: 011-42-32323196, or its successors or assigns (“Lender”), on February 7, 2014 (“Maturity Date”) at
515 Rockaway Avenue, Valley Stream, New York 11581, or at such other place as the Lender may designate from time to time in writing
to the Debtor, in lawful money of the United States of America, the principal sum of Two Hundred Thousand Dollars ($200,000.00).


  


This
note may be tendered as payment by the Lender for any securities issued by the Borrower.


  


The
delay or failure to exercise any right hereunder shall not waive such right. The undersigned hereby waives demand, presentment,
protest, notice of dishonor or nonpayment, notice of protest, any and all delays or lack of diligence in collection hereof and
assents to each and every extension or postponement of the time of payment or other indulgence. This Note shall be governed by,
and construed and interpreted in accordance with, the laws of the State of New York, United States of America. Exclusive jurisdiction
relating to this Note shall vest in courts located in New York County, New York State, United States of America. This Note shall
be deemed an unconditional obligation of Borrower for the payment of money and, without limitation to any other remedies of Holder,
may be enforced against Borrower by summary proceeding pursuant to New York Civil Procedure Law and Rules Section 3213 or any similar
rule or statute in the jurisdiction where enforcement is sought. For purposes of such rule or statute, any other document or agreement
to which Holder and Borrower are parties or which Borrower delivered to Holder, which may be convenient or necessary to determine
Holder’s rights hereunder or Borrower’s obligations to Holder are deemed a part of this Note, whether or not such other
document or agreement was delivered together herewith or was executed apart from this Note. If default is made in the payment
of this Note, Borrower shall pay the Holder hereof reasonable costs of collection, including reasonable attorneys' fees.


  


This
note shall be secured pursuant to the existing security agreements between the Lender and Borrower dated as of March 6, 2007 and
September 29, 2008, as amended.


   


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed and delivered this Note the date and year first above written.


  


	 	NaturalNano, Inc.
	 	 	 
	 	 	/s/ James Wemett
	 	By:	/s/ James Wemett
	WITNESS	Its:	CEO
Exhibit 23.2

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent  public  accountants,  we hereby consent to the  incorporation by
reference of our report  included in this Form 10-K as it relates to  Washington
Energy Company and Washington  Natural Gas Company (the  Companies),  into Puget
Sound Energy, Inc.'s previously filed Registration Statement File Nos. 33-26818,
33-27396, 333-41113, 333-41157, 333-23393 and 333-65053. It should be noted that
we have not audited any  financial  statements  of the  Companies  subsequent to
September 30, 1996 or performed any audit  procedures  subsequent to the date of
our report.

                                                            Arthur Andersen LLP

Seattle, Washington,
March 15, 1999
# C_2022432EN.01001201.xml

| 14.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 432/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 432/12

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší soud (Czech Republic) lodged on 26 August 2022 — Inkreal s. r. o. v Dúha reality s. r. o.

(Case C-566/22)

(2022/C 432/14)

Language of the case: Czech

Referring court

Nejvyšší soud

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Inkreal s. r. o.

Defendant: Dúha reality s. r. o.

Question referred

From the perspective of the existence of an international element, which is required for Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters to apply, is the application of that regulation to be based solely on the fact that two parties with their seat in the same Member State agree on the jurisdiction of courts of another EU Member State?

---

(1)  OJ 2012 L 351, p. 1.

---