~u~ filnurl nf ~lr3,i[, 2017-SC-000115-KB 

IQ) ffe\ lJ [~.Mz?//7 //,,w '1.t.1111on, i)C_ 

KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION MOVANT 

V. IN SUPREME COURT 

DAVID THOMAS SPARKS RESPONDENT 

OPINION AND ORDER 

The Board of Governors ("Board") for the Kentucky Bar Association 

("KEA") recommends this Court suspend Respondent, David Thomas Sparks, 

from the practice of law for one year, to run consecutively with other pending 

suspensions and that he be required to repay his former client, Donald G. 

Meredith, the sum of $1,000.00. The Board further recommends that 

Respondent be required to attend ancl successfully complete the Ethics·and 

Professional Enhancement Program ("EPEP"), and that Respondent be referred 

to the Kentucky Lawyer Assistance Program ("KYLAP"). The Board also 

proposes that Respondent be required to satisfy all conditions imposed in other 

pending disciplinary actions 1 and that Respondent be required to pay all costs 

1 Previously, by Opinion and Order, Respondent was suspended from the 

practice oflaw in February 2016 for one hundred eighty one-one days, with one 

hundred twenty days of that suspension probated with conditions. In September 
associated with this action. Respondent's bar roster address is 1719 Ashley 

Circle, Suite 100, P.O. Box 1925, Bowling Green, KY 42102-1925, and his KBA 

Member Number is 85840. 

I. BACKGROUND 

In December 2014, Donald G. Meredith paid Respondent $1,000.00 to 

represent him in a foreclosure action in which Meredith and his wife claim that 

$50,000.00 of personal property was stolen from their vacated home. After 

paying Respondent the $1,000.00, Meredith claimed that Respondent provided 

no legal services; that he failed to respond to two registered letters requesting 

information; and that he also did not provide consultation or any work. 

After many unsuccessful attempts to. contact Respondent, Meredith filed 

a bar complaint with the KBA in Aprir2016. Upon receiving and reviewing the 

complaint, the Office of Bar Counsel ("OBC") mailed a copy to Respondent via 

certified mail at his bar roster address. Respondent did not answer the 

complaint. A couple of weeks later, OBC mailed the Warren County Sheriffs 

Office a copy of the ~ompiaint for personal service at Respondent's bar roster 

address. Eventually, .the Sheriffs Office was able to serve Respondent with a 

2016, this Court suspended Respondent for one hundred eighty-one days to run 

consecutively to his previous suspension. In December 2016, this Court revoked 

Respondent's probation imposed in February 2016 due to violation of the conditions 

assessed in that case·and imposed the remaining one hundred twenty day suspension 

originally ordered in February 2016. Respondent must complete the one hundred 

eighty-one day suspension ordered in September 2016, as well as, the one hundred 

twenty day suspension that was probated in February 2016 and ordered in December 

2016 to be served due to revocation. 

2 
copy at a different address. Again, no response to the complaint was filed by 

Respondent. 

In August 2016, the Inquiry Commission ("Commission") launched a 

complaint against Respondent alleging the following violations: 

(1) SCR 3.130(1.3) (Diligence) for failing to act with reasonable diligence and 

promptness in representing a client; (2) SCR 3.130(1.4)(a)(2) (Communication) 

for failure to consult with a client about the means by which the-client's 

objectives are to be accomplished; (3) SCR 3.130(1.4)(a)(4) (Communication) for 

failure to promptly comply with reasonable requests for information; (4) SCR 

3.130(1.16)(d) (Declining or Terminating Representation) for abandoning the 

client, failing to return the client's paperwork, failing to return any advance 

payment not used, and failure to properly withdraw from the case upon 

termination of representation; (5) SCR 3.130(8. l)(b) (Bar Admission and 

Disciplinary Matters) for failure to respond to a lawful demand for information 

from a disciplinary authority. The Commission's Charge was mailed to 

Respondent in August 2016. It was retur;ned with a handwritten note that read 

"BOX CLOSED, UNABLE TO FORWARD." Numerous other unsuccessful 

attempts were made by the Warren County Sheriffs Department to serve 

Respondent. Respondent has not filed an answer to the Commission's Charge. 

II. ANALYSIS 

Due to Respondent's failure to respond to the Charge, the Commission 

submitted the matter to the Board of Governors under SCR 3.210(1), our rule 

3 
for processing cases of default.2 Following a discussion of the charges, 

seventeen members of the Board voted on Respondent's charges and 

unanimously found him guilty of each charge. After considering Respondent's 

prior disciplinary history, the Board unanimously recommended the 

disciplinary measures proffered by the Commission as previously set forth 

herein. The Board also voted that service of this suspension run consecutively 

to the suspensions previously ordered in Kentucky Bar Association v. Sparks, 

480 S.W.3d 278 (Ky. 2016)3; Kentucky Bar Association v. Sparks, 498 S,:W,3d 

389 (Ky. 2016)4 ; and Kentucky Bar Association v. Sparks, 505 S.W.3d 258 (Ky. 

2016).5 

Having reviewed the record, we agree that the Board reached the 

appropriate conclusions as to Respondent's guilt." Respondent has not filed a 

notice to this Court to review the Board's decision, and we do not elect to 

2 "If no answer is filed after a. Respondent is notified, the Inquiry Commission 

shall order the record, together with such investigative evidence as may have been 

obtained, to be submitted to the Board." 

3 In February 2016, by Opinion and Order, Re~pondent was suspended from 

the practice of law for a period of one hundred eighty-one days, with sixty-one days to 

be served and the remainder to be probated with conditions. 

4 In September 2016, by Opinion and Order, Respondent was suspended from 

th~ practice of law for a period of one hundred eighty-one days to run consecutively to 

the suspension ordered by this Court in February 2016. 

s In December of 2016, by Opinion and Order, this Court revoked the partially · 

probated suspension from February 2016 and ordered Respondent to setve the 

remaining of the one hundred twenty days. One of the conditions of probation was 

that Respondent was not to receive any new disciplinary charges after February 2016, 

and the OBC received a new complaint in April 2016. · 

4 
review the decision of the Board under SCR 3.370(8).6 Accordingly, the 

decision of_the Board is hereby adopted under SCR 3.370(9).7 

For the foregoing reasons, it is hereby ORDERED: 

1. Respondent, David Thomas Sparks, is found guilty of violating SCR 3.130 

(1.3); SCR 3.130 (1.4)(a)(2); SCR 3.130 (l.4)(a)(4); SCR 3.130 (1.16)(d); 

and SCR 3.130 (8. l)(b). 

2. Respondent is suspended from the practice of law for one year to run 

consecutively with the one hundred eighty-one days from the February 

2016 Opinion and Order and another one hundred eighty-one day 

suspension from the September 2016 Opinion and Order, all to run 

consecutively.' Further Respondent is to be referred to KYLAP; directed to 

attend and successfully complete EPEP; directed to refund the $1,000.00 

unearned fee to Donald G. Meredith; and directed to satisfy all conditions 

imposed in this and the other pending disciplinary actions. 

3. As required by SCR 3.390, Respondent shall notify by letter duly placed 

with the United States Postal Service, all courts or tribunals in which he 

6 "If no notice of review is filed by either party, the Court may notify Bar 

Counsel and Respondent that it will review the decision. If the Court so acts, Bar 

Counsel and Respondent may each file briefs, not to exceed thirty (30) pages in length, 

within thirty (30) days, with no right to file reply briefs unless by order of the Court, 

whereupon the case shall stand submitted. Thereafter, the Court shall enter such 

orders or opinion as it deems appropriate on the entire record." 

1 "If no notice of review is· filed by either of the parties, or the Court under 

paragraph eight (8) of this rule, the Court shall enter an order adopting the decision of 

the Board or the Trial Commissioner, whichever the case may be, relating to all 

matters." 

5 
has matters pending, and all his clients of his inability to represent them 

and of the necessity and urgency of promptly retaining new counsel. 

Respondent shall simultaneously provide a copy of all such letters of 

notification to the Office of Bar Counsel. Respondent shall immediately 

cancel any pending advertisements to the extent possible, and shall 

terminate any advertising activity. 

4. In accordance with SCR 3.450, Respondent is directed to pay all costs 

associated with these disciplinary proceedings against him, said sum 

being·$342.85, for which execution may issue from this Court upon 

finality of this Opinion and Order. 

All sitting. All concur. 

ENTERED: JUNE 15, 2017. 

6