alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Alberto Sanchez MEJIA, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 15-72723

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted February 13, 2018 *

Filed February 22, 2018

Rosana Cheung, Attorney, Law Office of Rosana Kit Wai Cheung, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner

Sabatino F. Leo, Trial Attorney, Suzanne N. Nardone, Esquire, DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent

Before: LEAVY, FERNANDEZ, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Alberto Sanchez Mejia, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for withholding of’removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. *Silaya v. Mukasey,*524 F.3d 1066, 1070 (9th Cir. 2008). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s determination that Mejia failed to demonstrate a nexus between the harm he fears and a protected ground. *See Zetino v. Holder,*622 F.3d 1007, 1016 (9th Cir. 2010) (applicant’s desire to be free from harassment by criminals motivated by theft or random violence by gang members bears no nexus to a protected ground). Thus, Mejia’s withholding of removal claim fails.

*567Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because Mejia failed to show it is more likely than not that he will be tortured by or with the consent or acquiescence of the government of Mexico. *See Aden v. Holder,*589 F.3d 1040, 1047 (9th Cir. 2009).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

**This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8947 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

1101 Charlotte Street in Georgetown, South Carolina, as the ‘‘Joseph 

Hayne Rainey Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 10, 2020 

Mr. RICE of South Carolina (for himself, Mr. CLYBURN, Mr. TIMMONS, Mr. 

WILSON of South Carolina, Mr. NORMAN, Mr. DUNCAN, and Mr. 

CUNNINGHAM) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1101 Charlotte Street in Georgetown, South 

Carolina, as the ‘‘Joseph Hayne Rainey Memorial Post 

Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. JOSEPH HAYNE RAINEY MEMORIAL POST OF4 FICE BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 1101 Charlotte Street in George7 town, South Carolina, shall be known and designated as 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8947 IH

1 the ‘‘Joseph Hayne Rainey Memorial Post Office Build2 ing’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Joseph Hayne Rainey 

7 Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
No. 11-10418.

#### Lenoir *v.*Florida.

Sup. Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

MARJORIE ANN GARLAND

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 3764

[ October 31, 2019 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit,

Martin County ; Lawrence M. Mirman , Judge; L.T. Case No.

16000591CFAXMX

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Karen E. Ehrlich, Assistant

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

D AMOORGIAN

, C IKLIN and K UNTZ

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### FRY, L. v. FRY, D.

1646 WDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/12/2017

2011-1815-Civil

(Armstrong)

Affirmed
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                         SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       347
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             347
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               347
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     55,250
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                 507,603
<OTHER-SE>                              (562,506)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 347
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             10,911
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         3,529
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (14,440)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                             (14,440)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.16(b)


 


February 19, 2014


 


Henry Esber


38 Angell Brook Drive


West Boylston, MA 01583


 


Re: Amended and Restated 8% Convertible
Debenture Conversion Letter Agreement


 


Dear Henry:


 


We are offering holders of the Innovus
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Innovus” or the “Company”) Amended and Restated 8% Convertible Debenture, dated
January 15, 2103 (the “Debenture”), with the opportunity to do a one-time conversion of the outstanding principal and
interest under the Debenture at a conversion rate of $0.40 per share of common stock of the Company.


 


If you would like to
participate in this conversion process, please (1) sign this letter agreement below and (2) please surrender the Debenture, appropriately
endorsed to us at 9171 Towne Centre Drive, Suite 440, San Diego, CA 92122 accompanied by your written notice to us setting forth
the names or names (with addresses(es)) in which the common stock of Innovus shall be issued and registered on the books of the
Company. The Debenture shall be marked cancelled on the books of the Company as of the date hereof, whether or not surrendered.


 


As of the date hereof, the principal and
accrued interest under the Debenture is $76,122 and will convert into 190,304 shares of our common stock.


 


If you would like to convert into shares
of the Company’s common stock as described above, please sign below.


 


Once you convert as described herein, your
Debenture will terminate in its entirety as of the date hereof.


 


Please scan this document back to me at
ldillen@innovuspharma.com or fax it back to us at 858-356-9452.


 


Kind Regards,


 


/s/ Lynnette Dillen


 


Lynnette Dillen


Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer


Innovus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.


 


I, hereby, agree to be bound by the terms and conditions of
this letter agreement:


 


	/s/ Henry Esber	 
	Henry Esber	 


 


cc. Dr. Bassam Damaj


President and CEO


 


Randy Berholtz, Esq.


Acting General Counsel and Secretary


 




    	1
# C_2021502EN.01004101.xml

| 13.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 502/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 502/41

---

Action brought on 19 October 2021 — Mendes v EUIPO — Actial Farmaceutica (VSL3TOTAL)

(Case T-678/21)

(2021/C 502/61)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Mendes SA (Lugano, Switzerland) (represented by: M. Cavattoni, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Actial Farmaceutica Srl (Rome, Italy)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark VSL3TOTAL — European Union trade mark No 11 702 172

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 17 August 2021 in Case R 1568/2020-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | uphold the present action; |
| --- | --- |

—

uphold the present action;

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | condemn the other party in the proceedings to bear the costs and fees. |
| --- | --- |

—

condemn the other party in the proceedings to bear the costs and fees.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 60(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 60(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
No. 11-10425.

#### Freeman *v.*Mohr, Director, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, et al.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
1/5/2011 Page 1 of 13



### INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT (IRExR)

Chemical ID: P-11-0115 Reviewer: Cinalli/SD1/5/2011 Page 2 of 13

INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

Chemical ID: P-11-0115 Assessor: Cinalli/SD1/5/2011 Page 3 of 13

INITIAL REVIEW EX POSURE REPORT

Chemical ID: P-11-01151/5/2011 Page 4 of 131/5/2011 Page 5 of 13

INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

Chemical ID: P-11-0115 Assessor: Cinalli/SD1/5/2011 Page 6 of 13

INITIAL REVIEW EX POSURE REPORT

Chemical ID: P-11-01151/5/2011 Page 7 of 131/5/2011 Page 8 of 13

INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

Chemical ID: P-11-0115 Assessor: Cinalli/SD1/5/2011 Page 9 of 13

INITIAL REVIEW EX POSURE REPORT

Chemical ID: P-11-01151/5/2011 Page 10 of 131/5/2011 Page 11 of 13

INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

Chemical ID: P-11-0115 Assessor: Cinalli/SD1/5/2011 Page 12 of 13

INITIAL REVIEW EX POSURE REPORT

Chemical ID: P-11-01151/5/2011 Page 13 of 13
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲

▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 500

18 12 06 00

08/03

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 03 Aug 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.06 N 76.88 W Meters AGL
#### IN the INTEREST OF: S.C., Minor

516 EDA 2017

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/27/2017

CP-51-DP-0001295-2012 (Philadelphia)

Affirmed — Application to Withdraw as Counsel Granted
No. 11-10553.

#### Kendrick *v.*McLaren et al.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

GANI BROWN

, Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES

, DIVISION OF LICENSING

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 3488

[ March 14, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services,

Division of Licensing, L.T. Case No. CW201703076

.

Gani Brown

, Hallandale Beach , pro se.

John B. Fricke, Jr., Senior Attorney, Department of Agriculture and

Consumer Services

, Division of Licensing, Tallaha ssee, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed. Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a).

D AMOORGIAN

, F ORST and K LINGENSMITH

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 45 (Friday, March 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 10595]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5577]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Special Emphasis Panel in Cross Disciplinary Activities; Notice 
of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting.

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Cross Disciplinary Activities 
(1193).
    Date and Time: March 25, 1997 8:30 am-5:00 pm.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 
1150, Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person(s): Rita V. Rodriguez, Program Director, CISE/
CDA, Room 1160, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, 
Arlington, VA 22230, Telephone: (703) 306-1980.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate CISE Minority Institutions 
Infrastructure proposals as part of the selection process for 
awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information, financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: March 3, 1997.
Linda Allen-Benton,
Deputy Director, Division of Human Resource Management, Acting 
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-5577 Filed 3-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
Submitted October 11,

affirmed December 29, 2016,

petition for review denied March 23, 2017 (361 Or 240)

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Plaintiff-Respondent, v.*ROLF KEELER, *Defendant-Appellant.*

Tillamook County Circuit Court

14CR25901; A159085

386 P3d 701

Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Lindsey Burrows, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant.

Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Rolf C. Moan, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Ortega, Presiding Judge, and Egan, Judge, and Lagesen, Judge.

*285PER CURIAM

This appeal arises from a judgment revoking defendant’s probation and sentencing him to 18 months’ incarceration. Defendant pleaded guilty to failing to register as a sex offender. Under the terms of the plea agreement, defendant received a dispositional downward departure sentence of probation. Defendant stipulated that if he violated any nonfinancial condition of probation, the trial court would revoke probation and sentence defendant to 18 months’ incarceration. Defendant later violated a nonfinan-cial condition of probation and, consistent with his stipulation, the trial court revoked probation and sentenced him to 18 months’ incarceration. On appeal, defendant raises two assignments of error, contending that (1) the trial court erred by revoking his probation; and (2) the trial court erred by imposing the 18-month term of incarceration. We reject the first assignment of error without written discussion and ORS 138.222(2)(d) prohibits us from reviewing the second assignment of error. *State v. Silsby,*282 Or App 104, 110-13, 386 P3d 172 (2016).

Affirmed.
# C_2023155EN.01002602.xml

| 2.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/26

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 28 December 2022 — G.A. v Hauptzollamt Braunschweig

(Case C-791/22, Hauptzollamt Braunschweig)

(2023/C 155/32)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Finanzgericht Hamburg

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: G.A.

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Braunschweig

Question referred

Is Directive 2006/112/EC (1) and, in particular, Articles 30 and 60 thereof, infringed where Article 215(4) of Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 (2) is declared under a national provision to be applicable mutatis mutandis to import VAT?

---

(1)  Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1).

(2)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code (OJ 1992 L 302, p. 1).

---
Security
Federal Corporation and Subsidiaries
































EXHIBIT
32





Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


OF
SECURITY FEDERAL CORPORATION


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), each
of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of Security
Federal Corporation (the “Company”) and in connection with the Company’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010
that:







1.
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
  and





2.
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the Company’s financial condition and results of operations as
      of the dates and for the periods presented in the financial statements
      included in the Report.








/s/Timothy
      W. Simmons
            
            /s/Roy
      G. LindburgTimothy
      W. Simmons
            
            Roy
      G. LindburgChief
      Executive Officer
            
            Chief
      Financial Officer





Dated:November
15, 2010
#### Juan Jr Cabujat TEOCO and Erlinda Hiso Teoco, Petitioners, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 16-72462

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted February 13, 2018 *

Filed February 21, 2018

Juan Jr Cabujat Teoco, Pro Se

Erlinda Hiso Teoco, Pro Se

Jennifer A. Bowen, Trial Attorney, Anthony Cardozo Payne, Senior Litigation Counsel, DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent

Before: LEAVY, FERNANDEZ, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Juan Jr Cabujat Teoco and Erlinda Hiso Teoco, natives and citizens of the Philippines, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reconsider. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reconsider. *Mohammed v. Gonzales,*400 F.3d 785, 791 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reconsider, where petitioners did not show the BIA made an error.of law or fact in its prior decision. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (“A motion to reconsider shall state the reasons for the motion by specifying the errors of fact or law in the prior Board decision and shall be supported by pertinent authority.”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8699 

To extend the authorization for the Erie Canalway National Heritage Corridor 

Commission. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 27, 2020 

Mr. TONKO (for himself, Mr. HIGGINS of New York, Mr. MORELLE, Mr. 

KATKO, Mr. REED, Mr. BRINDISI, Ms. STEFANIK, Mr. DELGADO, and 

Mr. SEAN PATRICK MALONEY of New York) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To extend the authorization for the Erie Canalway National 

Heritage Corridor Commission. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Erie Canalway Na5 tional Heritage Corridor Commission Reauthorization 

6 Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8699 IH

1 SEC. 2. ERIE CANALWAY NATIONAL HERITAGE CORRIDOR 

2 COMMISSION EXTENSION. 

3 Section 804(j) of division B of H.R. 5666 (Appendix 

4 D) as enacted into law by section 1(a)(4) of Public Law 

5 106–554 (16 U.S.C. 461 note; 114 Stat. 2763, 2763A– 

6 295; 123 Stat. 1294) is amended by striking ‘‘shall termi7 nate’’ and all that follows through the period and inserting 

8 ‘‘shall terminate on September 30, 2034.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
PAGE <1>

                                  Exhibit 32.1

                               Pyramid Oil Company

                  Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                        As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
                         Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Pyramid Oil Company (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, John H. Alexander, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


     Dated: March 30, 2009

                                               JOHN H. ALEXANDER
                                               -----------------
                                               John H. Alexander
                                            Chief Executive Officer






















PAGE <1>

                                   Exhibit 32.2

                                Pyramid Oil Company

                  Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                        As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
                         Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Pyramid Oil Company (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Lee G. Christianson,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



     Date: March 30, 2009

                                                LEE G. CHRISTIANSON
                                                -------------------
                                                Lee G. Christianson
                                              Chief Financial Officer