alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2023321EN.01001101.xml

| 11.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 321/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 321/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 13 July 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék — Hungary) — Xella Magyarország Építőanyagipari Kft. v Innovációs és Technológiai Miniszter

(Case C-106/22, (1) Xella Magyarország)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Free movement of capital - Freedom of establishment - Regulation (EU) 2019/452 - Legislation of a Member State establishing a mechanism for filtering foreign investment in resident companies considered to be ‘strategic’ - Decision adopted on the basis of that legislation, prohibiting the acquisition by a resident company of all the shares of another resident company - Acquired company considered to be ‘strategic’ on the ground that its primary activity concerns the extraction of certain raw materials such as gravel, sand and clay - Acquiring company considered to be a ‘foreign investor’ on the ground that it forms part of a group of companies whose ultimate parent company is established in a third country - Harm or risk of harm to a national interest, public security or public order of the Member State - Objective intended to ensure the security of supply of raw materials to the construction sector, in particular at the local level)

(2023/C 321/12)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Fővárosi Törvényszék

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Xella Magyarország Építőanyagipari Kft.

Defendant: Innovációs és Technológiai Miniszter

Intervening party:
  ‘JANES ÉS Társa’ Szállítmányozó, Kereskedelmi és Vendéglátó Kft

Operative part of the judgment

The provisions of the TFEU on freedom of establishment

must be interpreted as precluding a foreign investment filtering mechanism provided for by the legislation of a Member State by means of which a resident company which is a member of a group of companies established in several Member States, over which an undertaking of a third country has decisive influence, may be prohibited from acquiring ownership of another resident company regarded as strategic, on the ground that the acquisition harms or risks harming the national interest in ensuring the security of supply to the construction sector, in particular at the local level, with respect to basic raw materials such as gravel, sand and clay.

---

(1)  
  OJ C 207, 23.5.2022.

---
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification Pursuant To Section 1350 OfChapter 63 Of U.S.C.**

**As Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 Of TheSarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002**

 

 

In connection with the QuarterlyReport of The Immune Response Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission, accompanied by this written statement (the “Report”), I, Michael K.Green, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to§ 1350 of Chapter 63 of 18 U.S.C., as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: November 14, 2003 |   |                              |   |
|--------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------|--------|
|                     |   | /s/ Michael K. Green              |   |
|                     |   |  Michael K. Green            |   |
|                     |   |  Vice President, Finance and |   |
|                     |   |  Chief Financial Officer     |   |

 

----
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8812 

To amend subtitle A of title II of division A of the CARES Act to provide 

a hardship waiver for certain overpayments of Pandemic Unemployment 

Assistance. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 24, 2020 

Ms. HERRERA BEUTLER (for herself and Mrs. MURPHY of Florida) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend subtitle A of title II of division A of the CARES 

Act to provide a hardship waiver for certain overpayments of Pandemic Unemployment Assistance. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Relief for Working 

5 Families Act of 2020’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8812 IH

1 SEC. 2. WAIVER AUTHORITY FOR CERTAIN OVERPAYMENTS 

2 OF PANDEMIC UNEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2102(d) of the CARES 

4 Act (15 U.S.C. 9021(d)) is amended by adding at the end 

5 the following: 

6 ‘‘(4) WAIVER AUTHORITY.—In the case of indi7 viduals who have received amounts of Pandemic Un8 employment Assistance to which they were not enti9 tled, the State shall require such individuals to repay 

10 such amounts to the State agency, except that the 

11 State agency shall waive such repayment if it deter12 mines that— 

13 ‘‘(A) the payment of such Pandemic Un14 employment Assistance was without fault on the 

15 part of any such individual; and 

16 ‘‘(B) such repayment would be contrary to 

17 equity and good conscience.’’. 

18 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

19 this section shall take effect as if included in the enact20 ment of the CARES Act (Public Law 116–136). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
IIB 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 886 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2019 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

AN ACT 

To direct the Attorney General to establish and carry out 

a Veteran Treatment Court Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 886 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veteran Treatment 

3 Court Coordination Act of 2019’’. 

4 SEC. 2. SENSE OF CONGRESS. 

5 It is the sense of Congress that veterans treatment 

6 courts are a successful program aimed at helping veterans 

7 charged with non-violent crimes receive the help and the 

8 benefits for which the veterans are entitled. 

9 SEC. 3. VETERAN TREATMENT COURT PROGRAM. 

10 (a) ESTABLISHMENT.—Subject to the availability of 

11 appropriations, in coordination with the Secretary of Vet12 erans Affairs, the Attorney General shall establish and 

13 carry out a Veteran Treatment Court Program to provide 

14 grants and technical assistance to court systems that— 

15 (1) have adopted a Veterans Treatment Court 

16 Program; or 

17 (2) have filed a notice of intent to establish a 

18 Veterans Treatment Court Program with the Sec19 retary. 

20 (b) PURPOSE.—The purpose of the Veterans Treat21 ment Court Program established under subsection (a) is 

22 to ensure the Department of Justice has a single office 

23 to coordinate the provision of grants, training, and tech24 nical assistance to help State, local, and Tribal govern25 ments to develop and maintain veteran treatment courts. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 886 RFS

1 (c) PROGRAMS INCLUDED.—The Veterans Treatment 

2 Court Program established under subsection (a) shall in3 clude the grant programs relating to veterans treatment 

4 courts carried out by the Attorney General pursuant to 

5 sections 2901, 2991, and 3021 of the Omnibus Crime 

6 Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (34 U.S.C. 10581, 

7 10651, and 10701) or any other provision of law. 

8 (d) REGULATIONS.—The Attorney General shall pro9 mulgate regulations to carry out this section. 

Passed the House of Representatives October 28, 

2019. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
The Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the financial
statements for Liberty Tax Credit Plus L.P. and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000818020
<NAME>                        Liberty Tax Credit Plus L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-15-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 MAR-16-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-15-1997
<CASH>                                         11,881,004
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  723,390
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,524,587   
<PP&E>                                         255,037,697 
<DEPRECIATION>                                 74,188,290  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 198,743,958 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          25,969,248  
<BONDS>                                        157,994,757 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0           
<PREFERRED>                                    0           
<COMMON>                                       0           
<OTHER-SE>                                     8,803,033   
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   198,743,958
<SALES>                                        0           
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               8,627,584   
<CGS>                                          0           
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0           
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               7,661,212   
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0           
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             3,203,371   
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,236,999) 
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0           
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0           
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0           
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0           
<CHANGES>                                      0           
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,236,999) 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (132.74)    
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0           
        

</TABLE>
# C_2023104EN.01002104.xml

| 20.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 104/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 104/21

---

Order of the President of the Court of 16 November 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto Juízo Local Cível da Maia — Portugal) — WH, NX v TAP — Transportes Aéreos Portugueses, SGPS, SA

(Case C-202/22, (1) TAP — Transportes Aéreos Portugueses)

(2023/C 104/31)

Language of the case: Portuguese

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  
  OJ C 244, 27.6.2022.

---
#### MCHALE, P. v. RIDDLE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL

3749 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/22/2017

Reargument Denied 11/28/2017

13-5890 (Delaware)

Affirmed
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 698 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 698

               For the relief of Arturo Hernandez-Garcia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 3, 2015

Mr. Perlmutter introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
               For the relief of Arturo Hernandez-Garcia.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR ARTURO HERNANDEZ-GARCIA.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Arturo Hernandez-Garcia 
shall be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment 
of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence 
upon filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under 
section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent 
resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Arturo Hernandez-Garcia enters the 
United States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), 
he shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, 
if otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under 
section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of 
the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Arturo Hernandez-Garcia, the 
Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, 
during the current or next following fiscal year, the total number of 
immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the country of 
the alien's birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas 
that are made available to natives of the country of the alien's birth 
under section 202(e) of such Act.
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Arturo 
Hernandez-Garcia shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded 
any right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
No. 11-10303.

#### Jones *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
R E T A I L I N S I T E 

RON PEPPER March 21, 2012

12264 EL C AM I N O RE A L  S U I T E 220  S A N DI E G O, CA 92130-3061 

M 8 58 .5 23 .2 09 0  F 8 5 8.5 2 3 .20 9 5 

C:\Users\jhenry.SDBUSINESS\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\AT6XO85W\SAN_DC Letter of Support_Alaska 

Airlines.doc 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Alaska Airlines’ application for SAN-DCA, Docket No. DOT-OST-2012-0029. 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

Retail Insite fully supports the application of Alaska Airlines for air service between San Diego and Washington 

Reagan National Airport (DCA). San Diego is the largest region without direct service to DCA. Additionally, due to 

the profound community of interest between San Diego and the nation’s capital, the region generates the 

largest passenger market demand without nonstop service to the convenient and close-in airport serving our 

nation’s capitol. 

San Diego’s sheer market size to Washington coupled with the fact that San Diego to Dulles average airfares are the 

highest of west coast cities, should qualify for the limited slots available for this flight. The high airfare is exacerbated 

when factoring in taxi fares from Dulles to Washington’s city center that average about $60 each way. This means 

travelers between Washington’s city center and San Diego via Dulles can pay on average close to $400 one-way. 

There are also countless other San Diego-based and Washington-based businesses that are engaged in health 

science, telecommunications, and national defense that need quick and convenient access to Reagan National 

Airport. Retail Insite has an immediate need for additional nonstop air service to our nation’s capital. Alaska Airlines 

service would add a needed nonstop option to a primary gateway to Washington, DC. Retail Insite joins with the San 

Diego County Regional Airport Authority, the San Diego Regional Economic Development Corporation, the World 

Trade Center San Diego, and the San Diego Regional Chamber of Commerce in support of Alaska Airlines’ 

application for San Diego – Washington Reagan National slots. 

We thank the Department of Transportation for the opportunity to comment on the above referenced docket and we 

hope to hear of a favorable review of Alaska Airlines’ San Diego – DCA proposal soon. 

Sincerely, 

RETAIL INSITE 

Commercial Real Estate 

Ron Pepper | California DRE Lic. 00865929 

858.523.2085 | rpepper@retailinsite.net
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification Pursuant to Section 1350of Chapter 63**

**of Title 18 of the United States Code**

 

I, John R. Murphy,President and Chief Executive Officer of Accuride Corporation, certify that tomy knowledge, (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the periodended March 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the informationcontained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for said period fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of Accuride Corporation.

 
| /s/ JOHN R.  MURPHY                    |   | Dated: | May 12,  2008 |
|----------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------------------|
| John R. Murphy                         |   |   |               |
| President and  Chief Executive Officer |   |   |

 

 

I, David K. Armstrong,Chief Financial Officer and General Counsel of Accuride Corporation, certifythat to my knowledge, (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended March 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the informationcontained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for said period fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of Accuride Corporation.

 
| /s/ DAVID K.  ARMSTRONG  |   | Dated: | May 12,  2008 |
|--------------------------|--------|--------|--------------------|
| David K.  Armstrong      |   |   |               |
| Chief Financial  Officer |   |   |

 

----
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-11192 Summary Calendar

JERRY ARAGON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus THOMAS HINKLE; SANTOS GARCIA; TONY ASH; MELISSA L. ARESKOG; LONA CHEARIS; CRAIG A. RAINES, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:96-CV-36

- - - - - - - - - - April 22, 1997 Before KING, JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Jerry Aragon (#376237), a state prisoner, has applied for leave to appeal in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in an appeal from the magistrate judge’s order dismissing his claims against several defendants named in his civil rights action. The Prison Litigation Reform Act applies to this appeal. See Strickland v. Rankin County Correctional Facility , 105 F.3d 972, 973-76 (5th Cir. 1997). Aragon has complied with the certificationNo. 96-11192 - 2 - requirements of the PLRA and his motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. Aragon is assessed an initial partial filing fee of $0.17. Aragon must also make monthly payments of 20% of the preceding month’s income credited to his account. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). The agency having custody of Aragon is ORDERED to forward funds from Aragon’s account to the clerk of the district court in payment of the initial partial filing fee. Thereafter, funds must be forwarded each time the amount in Aragon’s account exceeds $10, until the full filing fee of $105 is paid. Aragon contends that the district court erred in dismissing his claims against Thomas Hinkle, Santos Garcia, Craig Raines, and Lona Cheairs for failure to state a claim. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). We have conducted a de novo review of the record. We hold that, as to the claims against Hinkle and Garcia, the connection between their alleged actions and a subsequent assault upon Aragon by another inmate was too attenuated to support the conclusion that their actions were causally connected with the assault or that Hinkle and Garcia exposed Aragon to a substantial risk of serious harm. See Neals v. Norwood , 59 F.3d 530, 533 (5th Cir. 1995). Aragon has failed to allege that Raines acted with deliberate indifference to the need to protect him from the risk of serious harm by failing to move him to another cell after the assault. Farmer v. Brennan , 511 U.S. 825, ___, 114 S. Ct. 1970, 1984 (1994). Finally, AragonNo. 96-11192 - 3 - has failed to allege that he was prejudiced in his legal efforts by the actions of defendant Cheairs. Henthorn v. Swinson , 955 F.2d 351, 354 (5th Cir. 1992). We decline to reach several issues pertaining to defendant Cheairs raised by Aragon for the first time on appeal. See Robertson v. Plano City of Texas , 70 F.3d 21, 23 (5th Cir. 1995). The district court’s judgment is
AFFIRMED.
IFP GRANTED; JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.
Deter. Prevent. Prevail.

DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY

DTRA Industry Day – SI IRO

POC: Acting Director Randy Long

Presenter: Carter Bertone

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Information 

Resiliency Office
SI – Information Resiliency Office

The Information Resiliency Office is responsible for proactively anticipating, preparing, and 

adapting to changing global information environment conditions in order to better defend the 

Agency, its people and its partners in the face of foreign malign influence activities.

• Protect the Agency, its programs, people, and infrastructure from the threat of FMI

• Emphasize positive, transparent, and factual messaging as central to all DTRA missions

• Develop and guide strategies for Agency personnel to execute the Agency’s missions in an 

increasingly complex and hostile foreign information environment

• Maximize the positive impact of US security assistance programs in collaborative and 

cooperative ways

• Conduct internal training initiatives to help our workforce and our foreign partners identify 

foreign malign influence

UNCLASSIFIED

Deter. Prevent. Prevail. UNCLASSIFIED 2
Present and Future Requirements

3

• Utilization of technology 

• Integrate information environment characterization processes 

• Ensure Agency personnel have situational awareness about the info ecosystem

• Enhance messaging streams and content reach 

• Innovation of novel approaches to preempt adversary attempts to undermine 

DTRA’s reputation and international environments

• Develop creative messaging pathways to enhance DTRA’s messaging efforts 

• Promulgate positive sentiment about DTRA in the information environment

• Network building with relevant stakeholders in regions especially vulnerable to 

WMD-related FMI

• Scientific and academic communities

• Public health professional connectivity

• Execute external training on FMI threats and mitigation measures to partner 

country stakeholders