alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2022463EN.01002101.xml

| 5.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 463/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 463/21

---

Action brought on 21 October 2022 — European Commission v Slovak Republic

(Case C-668/22)

(2022/C 463/28)

Language of the case: Slovak

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: B. Sasinowska, G. Wilms and R. Lindenthal, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Slovak Republic

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by failing to take the measures necessary to achieve certain results resulting from Commission Regulation (EC) No 29/2009 (1) of 16 January 2009 laying down requirements on data link services for the single European sky, the Slovak Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 4(3) TEU in conjunction with Article 3(1) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 29/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to take the measures necessary to achieve certain results resulting from Commission Regulation (EC) No 29/2009 (1) of 16 January 2009 laying down requirements on data link services for the single European sky, the Slovak Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 4(3) TEU in conjunction with Article 3(1) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 29/2009;

| — | order the Slovak Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Slovak Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pursuant to Article 3(1) of Regulation (EC) No 29/2009, ATS providers are to ensure that ATS units providing air traffic services within the airspace referred to in Article 1(3) of that regulation are capable of providing and operating data link services as defined in Annex II to that regulation. The data services defined in Annex II are: data link initiation capability (DLIC), ATC communication management (ACM) service, ATC clearance and information (ACL) service and ATC microphone control (AMC) service. Contrary to Article 3(1) of Regulation (EC) No 29/2009, the ATS provider entrusted by the Slovak Republic has not ensured that ATS units are capable of providing and operating the data link services defined in Annex II to that regulation. The Slovak Republic, within the meaning of Article 4(3) of the EU Treaty, had not, at the time of the expiry of the time limit in its reasoned opinion, taken the necessary measures to ensure that the ATS provider entrusted by it complies with the requirements of Article 3(1) of Regulation (EC) No 29/2009.

---

(1)  OJ 2009 L 13, p. 3.

---
<Page>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 32f

        Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18
                            of the United States Code

     I, Thomas M. O'Flynn, Chief Financial Officer of PSEG Power LLC, to the
best of my knowledge, certify that (i) the Annual Report of PSEG Power LLC on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the "Periodic Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Periodic Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of PSEG Power LLC.


                                     /s/ Thomas M. O'Flynn
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Thomas M. O'Flynn
                                     PSEG Power LLC
                                     Chief Financial Officer
                                     February 25, 2004
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 32.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350*


In connection with the Annual Report of PGI Incorporated (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Laurence A. Schiffer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:


(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
       15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
       material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
       the Company.



/s/ Laurence A. Schiffer
---------------------------------------------------------
    Laurence A. Schiffer
    Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)      March 31, 2008


<FN>
*A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company
 and will be retained by the Company and will be furnished to the Securities
 and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EAC Decision on Request for Interpretation 2013 – 03 

(Timestamps)

Date: 

May 29, 2013 

Question: 

Shall the proper presentation and implementation of timestamps include the year?

Section of Guidelines: 

2005 VVSG Volume 1 Section 2.1.5.1.a.iii

2.1.5.1.a. The timing and sequence of audit record entries is as important as the data contained in the 

record. All voting systems shall meet the requirements for time, sequence and preservation of audit 

records outlined below.

iii. All audit record entries shall include the time-and-date stamp.

Discussion: 

In metadata, the term date is a representation term used to specify a calendar date in the Gregorian 

calendar. Many data representation standards such as XML, XML Schema, Web Ontology Language 

specify that ISO date format ISO 8601 should be used. The most commonly accepted English 

definition of the word defines “date” as “Time stated in terms of the day, month, and year.” 

(Emphasis added)

Conclusion: 

The EAC agrees that the year must be included in the timestamp and will implement the following 

interpretation:

All timestamps shall include the date and time, including hours, minutes and seconds. When possible, 

the complete date will be defined as follows:

Year - Month – Day = YYYY-MM-DD (e.g. 2013-05-28)

Other variations including MM-DD-YYYY and 2 digit year designations such as YY = (’13) will be 

accepted only until the implementation of the next iteration of the Voluntary Voting System 

Guidelines. 

Effective Date: 

Effective for all systems without an approved application for testing.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                 STEVENS INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
              COMPUTATIONS OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE
                                  (UNAUDITED)
                 (AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
 
                                                        THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                            MARCH 31,
                                                        -------------------
                                                          1996       1997
                                                        --------   --------
<S>                                                     <C>        <C>
PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED:

   WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING...............     9,451      9,451
   ASSUMED EXERCISE OF SERIES A AND B STOCK OPTIONS
     (TREASURY STOCK METHOD).........................        --         --
                                                        -------    -------

TOTAL COMMON SHARE EQUIVALENTS.......................     9,451      9,451
                                                        =======    =======

NET INCOME (LOSS)....................................   $(1,085)   $(2,999)
                                                        =======    =======

PER SHARE AMOUNTS  -- PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED:

NET INCOME (LOSS)....................................   $ (0.11)   $ (0.32)
                                                        =======    =======
 
</TABLE>
# C_2022158EN.01000601.xml

| 11.4.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 158/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.4.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 158/6

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Noord-Holland, sitting in Haarlem (Netherlands) lodged on 11 January 2022 — PR Pet BV v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Douane, kantoor Eindhoven

(Case C-24/22)

(2022/C 158/07)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Rechtbank Noord-Holland, sitting in Haarlem

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: PR Pet BV

Defendant: Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Douane, kantoor Eindhoven

Questions referred

| 1. | Must CN heading 9403 be interpreted as meaning that cat scratching posts, made up of a variety of materials, intended to be placed on the floor in (living) areas and to remain there so that cats can climb into them, sit on them, lie on them and scratch them, are not covered by this CN heading because they are of a different nature as referred to in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1229/2013 (1) of 28 November 2013 and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 350/2014 (2) of 3 April 2014? If there is a different nature that precludes classification under CN heading 9403, what constitutes that different nature? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Must CN heading 9403 be interpreted as meaning that cat scratching posts, made up of a variety of materials, intended to be placed on the floor in (living) areas and to remain there so that cats can climb into them, sit on them, lie on them and scratch them, are not covered by this CN heading because they are of a different nature as referred to in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1229/2013 (1) of 28 November 2013 and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 350/2014 (2) of 3 April 2014? If there is a different nature that precludes classification under CN heading 9403, what constitutes that different nature?

| 2. | Does the answer to question 1 have any implications for the validity of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1229/2013 of 28 November 2013 and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 350/2014 of 3 April 2014? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Does the answer to question 1 have any implications for the validity of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1229/2013 of 28 November 2013 and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 350/2014 of 3 April 2014?

---

(1)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1229/2013 of 28 November 2013 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature (OJ 2013 L 322, p. 8).

(2)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 350/2014 of 3 April 2014 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature (OJ 2014 L 104, p. 4).

---
Exhibit 10.38

 

AMENDMENT TO THE MASTER SERVICES AGREEMENT

 

This amendment to the Master Services Agreement (this “Amendment”) is entered into effective November 1, 2013 (the “Effective Date”), by and between Sports & Entertainment Physicians, PC, a Connecticut professional corporation, with its principal place of business at 188 Northrop Street, Bridgewater, Connecticut 06751 (“Provider”), and SFX Entertainment, Inc., a Delaware corporation, with its principal place of business at 430 Park Avenue, 6th Floor, New York, New York 10022 (“Client,” together with the Provider, the “Parties”).

 

RECITALS

 

WHEREAS, Provider and Client entered into a Master Services Agreement (the “Agreement”) pertaining to the provision of certain services set forth in Appendix I to the Agreement;

 

WHEREAS, the Parties desire to amend the Agreement pursuant to the terms and conditions contained herein to be effective and enforceable as of the Effective Date; and

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises of the Parties, the Parties hereby agree to amend the Agreement pursuant to the terms and conditions herein:

 

a.              Section 3.1 shall be amended to read as follows:

 

3.1 Term.  The initial term of this Agreement will begin on the Effective Date and will continue for two (2) years (the “Initial Term”), unless terminated earlier as provided in Section 3.2 below. Thereafter, the Client and Provider may renew the Agreement on mutually agreeable terms and conditions each year for an additional one (1) year thereafter.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed by their duly authorized representatives.

 

 

	
SPORTS &   ENTERTAINMENT PHYSICIANS, PC
    	
 
    	
 
    	
SFX ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:
    	
/s/ Andrew Bazos MD
    	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/ Richard Rosenstein
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Name:
    	
Andrew   Bazos MD
    	
 
    	
Name:   
    	
Richard   Rosenstein
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Title:
    	
 
    	
 
    	
Title:   
    	
Chief   Executive Officer
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Date:   
    	
3/28/14
    	
 
    	
Date:
    	
3/28/14
# C_2022368EN.01001302.xml

| 26.9.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 368/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.9.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 368/13

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Pontevedra (Spain) lodged on 25 May 2022 — Maersk A/S v Allianz Seguros y Reaseguros, S.A.

(Case C-347/22)

(2022/C 368/19)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Audiencia Provincial de Pontevedra

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Maersk A/S

Defendant: Allianz Seguros y Reaseguros, S.A.

Questions referred

The facts and pleas in law are essentially the same and the questions referred for a preliminary ruling are identical to those in Case C-345/22.

---
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****    - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский 

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

        - Student Loans
        - Grants
        - Laws
        - Data

            - taxonomy view
            - Green Ribbon Schools 

# Green Ribbon Schools 

# Green Ribbon Schools 

                      -  September 27, 2021  Awards Ceremony Tuesday for 2021 U.S. Department of Education Green Ribbon Schools  
Representatives from the 2021 U.S. Department of Education Green Ribbon Schools, District Sustainability Awardees, and Postsecondary Sustainability Awardees will be honored in a ceremony Tuesday at the Education Department headquarters in Washington.
  **Tags:**Green Ribbon SchoolsMedia Advisories

## How Do I Find...?

                      - Student loans, forgiveness
                      - Higher Education Rulemaking
                      - College accreditation
                      - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
                      - FERPA
                      - FAFSA
                      - 1098, tax forms
                      - More...

## Information About...

                      - Elevating Teaching
                      - Early Learning
                      - Engage Every Student
                      - Unlocking Career Success
                      - Cybersecurity

----

*Our mission* is to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness by fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access.

          - Student Loans
          - Repaying Loans
          - Defaulted Loans
          - Loan Forgiveness
          - Loan Servicers
          - Grants & Programs
          - Apply for Pell Grants
          - Grants Forecast
          - Apply for a Grant

          - Laws & Guidance
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - Civil Rights
          - IDEA Website
          - Data & Research
          - Education Statistics
          - Postsecondary Education Data
          - ED Data Express
          - Nation's Report Card
          - What Works Clearinghouse
          - Open Data Platform
          - COVID Relief Data

          - About Us
          - Contact Us
          - ED Offices
          - Jobs
          - Press Releases
          - FAQs
          - Recursos en español
          - Budget, Performance
          - Privacy Program
          - Homeroom Blog

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information Quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 44 (Thursday, March 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10255-10256]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5542]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Submission For OMB Review; Comment Request

    DOC has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for 
clearance the following proposal for collection of information under 
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).
    Agency: Bureau of the Census.
    Title: Annual Capital Expenditures Survey.
    Form Number(s): ACE-1, ACE-1(l), ACE-2, ACE-2(l).
    Agency Approval Number: 0607-0782.
    Type of Request: Revision of a currently approved collection.
    Burden: 114,000 hours.
    Number of Respondents: 46,000.
    Avg. Hours Per Response: 2.5 hours.
    Needs and Uses: The Census Bureau plans the continuing information 
collection for the 1996 and 1997 Annual Capital Expenditures Survey 
(ACES) measuring capital investment in new

[[Page 10256]]

and used structures and equipment. The ACES is the sole source of 
detailed comprehensive statistics on actual business spending by 
domestic, private, nonfarm businesses operating in the United States. 
Major changes from the 1995 collection of ACES data are the annual 
collection of data form businesses with one to four employees and 
nonemployers, and a request from employer businesses for data on total 
company sales and receipts, and sales and receipts for the three ACES 
industries with the largest sales and receipts.
    Business spending data are used to evaluate the quality of 
estimates of gross domestic product, develop monetary policy, analyze 
business asset depreciation, and improve estimates of capital stock for 
productivity analysis. Industry analysts use these data for market 
analysis, economic forecasting, identifying business opportunities, 
product development, and business planning.
    Affected Public: Business or other for-profit, Not-for-profit 
institutions.
    Frequency: Annually.
    Respondent's Obligation: Mandatory.
    Legal Authority: (Title 13 USC, Sections 182, 224, and 225.
    OMB Desk Officer: Jerry Coffey, (202) 395-7314.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing Linda Engelmeier, DOC Forms Clearance Officer, 
(202) 482-3272, Department of Commerce, room 5312, 14th and 
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230.
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to Jerry Coffey, OMB Desk Officer, room 10201, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.

    Dated: February 28, 1997.
Linda Engelmeier,
Departmental Forms Clearance Officer, Office of Management and 
Organization.
[FR Doc. 97-5542 Filed 3-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-07-M
<PAGE>

                                 EXHIBIT 23 (b)


                          CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP

                         Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" in the
registration statement (Form S-3) and related prospectus of Hibernia Corporation
for the registration of 3,500,000 shares of its common stock and to the
incorporation by reference therein of our report dated January 16, 2002, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements of Hibernia Corporation
incorporated by reference in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 2001, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

                                        /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP



New Orleans, Louisiana
January 10, 2003
# C_2023223EN.01002401.xml

| 26.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 223/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 223/24

---

Judgment of the General Court of 3 May 2023 — Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi v EUIPO — M. J. Dairies (BBQLOUMI)

(Case T-106/22) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark BBQLOUMI - Earlier EU collective word mark HALLOUMI - Relative grounds for invalidity - Likelihood of confusion - Detriment to reputation - Article 8(1)(b), Article 8(5) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b), Article 8(5) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

(2023/C 223/33)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi (Nicosia, Cyprus) (represented by: S. Malynicz and C. Milbradt, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: M. J. Dairies EOOD (Sofia, Bulgaria) (represented by: I. Pakidanska and D. Dimitrova, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 14 December 2021 (Case R 656/2021-4).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 165, 19.4.2022.

---
Submitted December 19, 2016,

reversed and remanded February 23, 2017

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Plaintiff-Respondent, v.*LUKE MORGAN FRASER, *Defendant-Appellant.*

Coos County Circuit Court

15CR0587; A160353

389 P3d 412

Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Emily R Seltzer, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant.

Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Leigh A. Salmon, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Ortega, Presiding Judge, and Egan, Judge, and Lagesen, Judge.

*898PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals his judgment of conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants, ORS 813.010. He assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress certain evidence, which asserted that the police entry into his bedroom without a warrant was unlawful under Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution. He argues on appeal, as he did below, that the entry was unlawful because his father, who allowed the police to enter the closed room defendant rented from him even though defendant indicated to the police that they did not have his permission to enter, was not authorized to give consent to enter defendant’s bedroom. The state concedes that, although consent is an established exception to the warrant requirement, the trial court erred because the state did not meet its burden of proving that defendant’s father had actual authority to consent to the entry. *See, e.g., State v. Bonilla,*356 Or 475, 481, 366 P3d 331 (2015) (“When the state relies on consent, it must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that ‘someone having the authority to do so’ voluntarily gave the police consent to search the defendant’s property and that any limitations on the scope of the consent were complied with.” (Quoting *State v. Weaver,*319 Or 212, 219, 874 P2d 1322 (1994).)). We agree, accept the state’s concession, and reverse and remand.

Reversed and remanded.