alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2022257EN.01002901.xml

| 4.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 257/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 257/29

---

Action brought on 16 May 2022 — European Commission v Republic of Slovenia

(Case C-328/22)

(2022/C 257/37)

Language of the case: Slovenian

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: B. Rous Demiri, E. Sanfrutos Cano)

Defendant: Republic of Slovenia

Form of order sought

The Commission claims that the Court should:

| 1. | declare that, by failing to ensure establishment of appropriate collecting systems for urban waste water






  — | under Article 4 of Council Directive 91/271/EEC, (1) for the agglomerations of Kočevje, Trbovlje, Loka and Ljubljana, |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.

declare that, by failing to ensure establishment of appropriate collecting systems for urban waste water

—

under Article 4 of Council Directive 91/271/EEC, (1) for the agglomerations of Kočevje, Trbovlje, Loka and Ljubljana,

| — | under Article 5 of Council Directive 91/271/EEC, for the agglomerations of Kočevje, Trbovlje and Loka, and |
| --- | --- |

—

under Article 5 of Council Directive 91/271/EEC, for the agglomerations of Kočevje, Trbovlje and Loka, and

| — | under Article 15 of, and sections B and D of Annex I to, Council Directive 91/271/EEC, for the agglomerations of Ljubljana and Ptuj, |
| --- | --- |

—

under Article 15 of, and sections B and D of Annex I to, Council Directive 91/271/EEC, for the agglomerations of Ljubljana and Ptuj,

declare that the Republic of Slovenia has failed to fulfil its relevant obligations under Articles 4, 5 and 15 of, and sections B and D of Annex I to, Council Directive 91/271/EEC concerning urban waste-water treatment;

| 2. | order the Republic of Slovenia to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

order the Republic of Slovenia to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The present case concerns the implementation in Slovenia of Council Directive 91/271/EEC of 21 May 1991 concerning urban waste-water treatment. The case concerns a long and comprehensive procedure seeking to establish failure to fulfil obligations provided for in EU law, which has been ongoing since 2014 and during the course of which the Commission established various infringements.

The infringement concerns the non-compliance with the directive of the waste water of certain agglomerations and the inadequate monitoring of discharge from the urban waste-water treatment plants. The number of agglomerations which failed to comply varied during the course of the procedure, given that certain infringements were remedied during the period in question, but others remain and constitute the basis of the present action.

---

(1)  Council Directive 91/271/EEC concerning urban waste-water treatment (OJ 1991 L 135, p. 40).

---
# C_2023205EN.01002101.xml

| 12.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 205/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 205/21

---

Appeal brought on 12 October 2022 by Luís Miguel Novais against the order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 2 August 2022 in Case T-376/22, Novais v Portugal

(Case C-637/22 P)

(2023/C 205/24)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Appellant: Luís Miguel Novais (represented by: Á. Oliveira and C. Almeida Lopes, advogados)

Other party to the proceedings: Portuguese Republic

By order of 20 April 2023, the Court of Justice (Sixth Chamber) dismissed the appeal as manifestly inadmissible and ordered Luís Miguel Novais to bear his own costs.

---
EX-4.64



 Exhibit 4.64 

Second Supplementary Agreement to the 

Web Layout Copyright License Agreement 

This second supplementary agreement to the web layout copyright license agreement (this “Supplementary Agreement”) is entered
into in Beijing on August 15, 2013 by and between: 
 Licensor: Baidu Online Network Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd. 

Address: 3/F, Baidu Campus, No.10, Shangdi 10th Street, Haidian District, Beijing (“Party
A”) 
 Licensee: Beijing Baidu Netcom Science Technnology Co., Ltd. 

Address: 2/F, Baidu Campus, No.10 Shangdi 10th Street, Haidian District, Beijing (“Party
B”) 
 (Collectively, the “Parties”) 

WHEREAS, 
  

	1.	Licensor and Licensee have made a certain Web Layout Copyright License Agreement dated March 1, 2004 (the “Original Agreement”). Through friendly negotiation, the Parties amend the Original
Agreement on August 15, 2013 with respect to the following: 

  

	 	(a)	Amend Section 6.1 to: this Agreement shall be executed and effective at the same time at the date first written above. Unless otherwise expressly stated in the Agreement, this Agreement shall be valid permanently.


  

	 	(b)	Delete Section 6.2. 

  

	 	(c)	The Parties agree and confirm: this Supplementary Agreement is an integral part of the Original Agreement. In the event of any discrepancy between this Supplementary Agreement and the Original Agreement, this
Supplementary Agreement shall prevail. For the parts not stated in this Supplementary Agreement shall be in accordance with the Original Agreement. 

  

	2	This Supplementary Agreement shall be effective upon execution by both Parties. 

  

	3	This Supplementary Agreement shall be executed in two originals, with each party holding one original. Each original has the same legal effect. 


[Signature page follows] 







 Licensor: Baidu Online Network Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd. 

/s/ Baidu Online Network Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd. 

Licensee: Beijing Baidu Netcom Science Technology Co., Ltd. 

/s/ Beijing Baidu Netcom Science Technology Co., Ltd. 

  
 2
# C_2021462EN.01005201.xml

| 15.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 462/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 462/52

---

Action brought on 13 September 2021 — Tinnus Enterprises v EUIPO — Mystic Products and Koopman International (Fluid distribution equipment)

(Case T-578/21)

(2021/C 462/63)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Tinnus Enterprises LLC (Plano, Texas, United States) (represented by: T. Wuttke, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Mystic Products Import & Export, SL (Badalona, Spain), Koopman International BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the design at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Design at issue: Community design No 1 431 829-0008

Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 1 July 2021 in Case R 1009/2018-3

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | alter the contested decision to:






  — | allow the applicant’s appeal, |
| --- | --- | --- |

—

alter the contested decision to:

—

allow the applicant’s appeal,

| — | dismiss in its entirety the invalidity applicants’ applications to declare the contested design invalid, |
| --- | --- |

—

dismiss in its entirety the invalidity applicants’ applications to declare the contested design invalid,

| — | order the invalidity applicants to pay the applicant’s costs in front of the Board of Appeal and the Invalidity Division; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the invalidity applicants to pay the applicant’s costs in front of the Board of Appeal and the Invalidity Division;

| — | order the invalidity applicants to pay the applicant’s fees and costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the invalidity applicants to pay the applicant’s fees and costs.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of the principles set forth in the judgment of 24 March 2021, Lego v EUIPO — Delta Sport Handelskontor (Building block from a toy building set) (T-515/19, not published, EU:T:2021:155); |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of the principles set forth in the judgment of 24 March 2021, Lego v EUIPO — Delta Sport Handelskontor (Building block from a toy building set) (T-515/19, not published, EU:T:2021:155);

| — | Infringement of the principles set forth in the judgment of 8 March 2018, DOCERAM (C-395/16, EU:C:2018:172); |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of the principles set forth in the judgment of 8 March 2018, DOCERAM (C-395/16, EU:C:2018:172);

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002;

| — | Misinterpretation of patent application EP 3 005 948 A2 and the applicant’s multiple design application No. 1 431 829-0001-0010. |
| --- | --- |

—

Misinterpretation of patent application EP 3 005 948 A2 and the applicant’s multiple design application No. 1 431 829-0001-0010.

---
About DEQ I Ccntact DEQ I Sltemap I Fe!dback I DEQ Seilrctl 

Oregon Department of Environmental Quality 

ProJects and Programs Publlcllllons and Fcnns Laws and ~ul&aons Public Notices Permits and Ucenss Datzlb•s!GIS 

DEQ Holr1e I Dl•lslons I Regions I Cclmllnlon 

Water Quality 

TGtalltfliiXlmum Dally LDildlll (TNDis) Ptvgl'llm 

• TMDLs Home onaon lMDLa Approved br EPA- 1"1 through lift 

• General Into 

• Tools/Modeling 

• TMDL.s approved after 1999 

• Implementation Waterbody Water 1MDL USEPA Completed COmpleted 

• Related Into (Baaln) Quality Parammn Approval TMDL 1MDL 

Con earn Data 5egmanta saama.a 

• COntacts Addreued IW Balin (cunallltlve) 

Select a Basin: Gam son Algae, Phospllarus 10/07/1988 1 1 

• Basin Map Lake .Aquauc 

(South Weeds 

• Basin/ coast) Subbasin Ust TUalatin DO Ammonia 10/07/1988 12 13 

RIVer 

• Stxlnnwatl!r (WIIIamette) 

l!lllb-Proarama COlumbia a. Fish Dioxin 0:1/25/1991 • 21 

• 401 cerutrc:auon Wlllamette consumpUon, 

• aean Water RIVers Wildlife 

state Revolving BearO'eek Algae, DO, Ammonia, 3/16/1992 3 

Fund (Rogue) pH BOD, 

• construction Phospllarus 

ActiVIties aearLake Protedfon ot Phospllarus 03/16/1992 1 Z5 

• Industrial (Mid coast) Watl!r Supply 

ActiVIties Yamhill Algae, pH Phospllarus 1:1/08/1992 3 28 

• Municipal RIVer 

Stxlnnwatl!r (WIIIamette) 

• Underground Pudding DO Ammonia, 10/18/1993 18 

InJection Wells RIVer BOD 

(WIIIamette) 

WQ Info &uldea: TUalatin Algae, pH Phospllarus Ol/27/1994 12 H 

• by alphabet RIVer 

(WIIIamette) 

• by catl!gory Rickreall DO BOD 04/18/1994 :1. 57 

O'eek 

(WIIIamette) 

Coast Fork Algae, DO, Ammonia, 05/17/1996 2 

Wlllamette pH Phospharus 

RIVer 

(WIIIamette) 
Coquille R DO BOD 07/03/1996 3 62 

(South 

Coast) 

Columbia Water Chlorophyll 11/25/1998 10 72 

Slough Contact, DO, a, Dissolved 

(Willamette) pH, Algae, Oxygen, pH, 

Fish Phosphorus, 

Consumption Bacteria, 

DOE/DDT, 

PCBs, Pb 

(lead), 

Dieldrin and 

2,3,7,8 

TCDD 

(dioxin) 

Upper Temperature Tern perature 05/04/1999 1 73 

Sucker 

Creek 

(Rogue) 

[print version] 

For more information about DEQ's Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) Progam contact Gene 

Foster by phone at 503-229-5325 or by email, or contact the appropriate Basin Coordinator. 

Oregon Department of Environmental Quality 

Headquarters: 811 SW Sixth Ave., Portland, OR 97204-1390 

Phone: 503-229-5696 or toll free in Oregon 1-800-452-4011 

Oregon Telecommunications Relay Service: 1-800-735-2900 FAX: 503-229-6124 

The Oregon Department of Environmental Quality is a regulatory agency authorized to protect Oregon's environment by 

the State of Oregon and the Environmental Protection Agency. 

DEQ Web site privacy notice 

Projects and Programs Publications and Forms Laws and Regulations Public Notices Permits and Licenses Databases/GIS 

About DEQ 1 Contact DEQ 1 Sitemap 1 Feedback
No. 11-975.

#### Henry Ford Health System, dba Henry Ford Hospital *v.*Department of Health and Human Serv*953ices.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

            Subsidiaries of Plains Exploration & Production Company.


                                                        Jurisdiction of
Name of Subsidiary                                        Organization

Plains E&P Company                                          Delaware
Arguello Inc.                                               Delaware
Plains Illinois Inc.                                        Delaware
Plains International Inc.                                   Delaware
PMCT Inc.                                                   Delaware
PXP Gulf Coast Inc.                                         Delaware
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****    - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский 

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

        - Student Loans
        - Grants
        - Laws
        - Data

            - taxonomy view
            - New Mexico 

# New Mexico 

# New Mexico 

                      -  July 22, 2021  U.S. Department of Education Approves New Mexico’s Plan for Use of American Rescue Plan Funds to Support K-12 Schools and Students, Distributes Remaining $327 Million To State  
Today, the U.S.  Department of Education (Department) announced the approval of New Mexico’s  American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ARP  ESSER) plan and distributed remaining ARP ESSER funds to them.
  **Tags:**New MexicoAmerican Rescue PlanPress Releases

## How Do I Find...?

                      - Student loans, forgiveness
                      - Higher Education Rulemaking
                      - College accreditation
                      - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
                      - FERPA
                      - FAFSA
                      - 1098, tax forms
                      - More...

## Information About...

                      - Elevating Teaching
                      - Early Learning
                      - Engage Every Student
                      - Unlocking Career Success
                      - Cybersecurity

----

*Our mission* is to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness by fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access.

          - Student Loans
          - Repaying Loans
          - Defaulted Loans
          - Loan Forgiveness
          - Loan Servicers
          - Grants & Programs
          - Apply for Pell Grants
          - Grants Forecast
          - Apply for a Grant

          - Laws & Guidance
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - Civil Rights
          - IDEA Website
          - Data & Research
          - Education Statistics
          - Postsecondary Education Data
          - ED Data Express
          - Nation's Report Card
          - What Works Clearinghouse
          - Open Data Platform
          - COVID Relief Data

          - About Us
          - Contact Us
          - ED Offices
          - Jobs
          - Press Releases
          - FAQs
          - Recursos en español
          - Budget, Performance
          - Privacy Program
          - Homeroom Blog

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information Quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 45 (Friday, March 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 10550]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5614]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. ER97-1507-000]


Northern Indiana Public Service Company, Notice of Filing

March 3, 1997.
    Take notice that on February 24, 1997, Northern Indiana Public 
Service Company tendered for filing an amendment in the above-
referenced docket.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such motions or 
protests should be filed on or before march 14, 1997. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-5614 Filed 3-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
(logo) ncb

National Cooperative Bank 

 

2011 Crystal Drive

Suite, 800

Arlington, VA 22202

 

 

February 6, 2018

 

Wells Fargo CommercialMortgage Securities, Inc. as Depositor

Attn: AJ Sfarra

375 Park Avenue, 2ndFloor

J0127-023

New York, NY 10152

 

RE:         Annual Statement as to Compliance

               WFCM 2015 C26

 

Dear Sir/Madam:

 

Inaccordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement entered into in connectionwith the issuance of the Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series2015-C26, as an authorized officer of National Cooperative Bank, N.A., formerlyNCB, FSB (the “NCB Special Servicer”), I hereby certify pursuant to Section11.12 thereof that:

 

a.        A reviewof the activities of the NCB Special Servicer during the preceding calendaryear (the “Reporting Period”) and of its performance under the Pooling andServicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.

 

b.        To thebest of my knowledge, based on these reviews, the NCB Special Servicer hasfulfilled all obligations under this agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

Please note that the annualfinancial statement will be sent under separate cover on or before March 31,2018.

 

 

Best regards,

 

/s/ Karyn Mann

Karyn Mann

Senior Vice President,Investor Compliance

National Cooperative Bank,N.A.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to this Quarterly Report of Mayors
Jewelers, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the thirteen weeks ended
December 27, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Lawrence R. Litowitz,
Interim Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Date:
January 7, 2005/s/ Lawrence R. LitowitzLawrence R. LitowitzInterim Chief Financial Officer
# Educational Assessment

- U.S. Department of Education Releases Guidance to States on Assessing Student Learning During the Pandemic Today, the U.S. Department of Education (ED) is providing guidance to states emphasizing the importance of flexibility in administering assessments this year as a result of the pandemic and supporting the use of assessment data as a source of information for parents and educators to target resources and support, rather than for accountability purposes this year.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                          OF CORPORATE GENERAL PARTNER

            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, James M. Seneff, Jr., the Chief Executive Officer of CNL Realty
Corporation,  the  corporate  general  partner of CNL Income Fund III, Ltd. (the
"Partnership"),  has executed this  certification  in connection with the filing
with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  of the  Partnership's  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 (the "Report"). The
undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

Date:   November 10, 2004              /s/ James M. Seneff, Jr.
                                      -----------------------------------------
                                       Name:  James M. Seneff, Jr.
                                       Title: Chief Executive Officer

                                      A   signed   original   of  this   written
                                      statement required by Section 906 has been
                                      provided to CNL Income Fund III,  Ltd. and
                                      will be  retained  by CNL Income Fund III,
                                      Ltd. and furnished to the  Securities  and
                                      Exchange  Commission  or  its  staff  upon
                                      request.
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed February

14 , 2012

.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 1 2

- 00 1 00

- C R NO. 14

- 12

- 00101

- CR

____________ IN RE WENDIYA KINCHIN , Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 56th District Court Galveston County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . 11CR3371 & 11CR3372



### M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

On February 3
, 201 2 , relator Wendiya Kinchin filed a petition for writ of mandamus
in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221 ; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. R elator complains that the presiding judge of the 56 th District Court of Galveston County has not set a hearing on two applicat ions for writs of habeas corpus.

To be entitled to mandamus relief in a criminal case , a relator must show that he has no adequate remedy at law to redress his alleged harm, and that what he seeks to compel is2

a ministerial act, not involving a di scretionary or judicial decision. State ex rel. Young v. Sixth Judicial Dist. Court of Appeals at Texarkana , 236 S.W.3d 207, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007) (orig. proceeding). When a trial judge refuses to issue a writ of habeas corpus or denies a hearing on the merits, the applicant may either present the application to another judge having jurisdiction, or “under proper circumstances” seek a writ of mandamus. Ex
parte Villanueva
, 252 S.W.3 d 391 , 304 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008 )

.

The Texas Code of Criminal Procedure provides that “[t]he writ of habeas corpus shall be granted without delay by the judge or court receiving the petition, unless it [is] manifest from the petition itself, or some documents annexed to it, that the party is entitled
to no relief wha t ever.” Tex.Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.15

. Relator has not provided this court with copies of the applications for writs of habeas corpus on which a hearing is requested

. Accordingly, this court is unable to determine whether the trial court may have

prop erly determined from the application s that relator was not entitled to relief. Relator
also has not established that the applications were properly filed and brought to the trial

court ’s attention. It is relator’s burden to provide this court with a reco rd sufficient to establish his right to relief. Walker v. Packer , 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex. 1992); Tex. R. App. P. 52.3(k), 52.7(a).

Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Jamison and McCally

. Do Not Publish

— Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
#### COM. v. HALL, J.

273 WDA 2017

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/15/2017

Reargument Denied 10/20/2017

CP-25-CR-0000055-2013 (Erie)

Affirmed