alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****    - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский 

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

        - Student Loans
        - Grants
        - Laws
        - Data

# Statement from U.S. Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona on Federal Student Aid Leadership

# Statement from U.S. Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona on Federal Student Aid Leadership

March 5, 2021

**Contact:  **press@ed.gov

                                    -        
U.S. Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona issued the following statement regarding Federal Student Aid leadership:

"I accepted the resignation of Federal Student Aid Chief Operating Officer Gen. Mark Brown and thanked him for his service to the U.S. Department of Education. As the nation continues grappling with economic disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, the need to deliver relief and fortify pathways to the middle class is more urgent than ever. Under my leadership, the Department of Education will work to strengthen college as a reliable pathway to the middle class while protecting students and loan borrowers. In service to our nation's students, the Department's Federal Student Aid division will renew its focus on streamlining access to and management of federal financial aid, easing the burden of student debt, and carefully stewarding taxpayer dollars. Robin Minor, the Deputy Chief Operating Officer for Partner Participation and Oversight has agreed to serve as acting Chief Operating Officer."
   -  Tags: Federal Student Aid (FSA)Press Releases
          How Do I Find...?    - Student loans, forgiveness
- Higher Education Rulemaking
- College accreditation
- Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
- FERPA
- FAFSA
- 1098, tax forms
- More...
      Information About...    - Elevating Teaching
- Early Learning
- Engage Every Student
- Unlocking Career Success
- Cybersecurity
Search press releasesSearch for:      Find By Month    - February 2024 
- January 2024 
- December 2023 
- November 2023 
- October 2023 
- September 2023 
- August 2023 
- July 2023 
- June 2023 
- May 2023 
- April 2023 
- March 2023 
- All Press Releases
             
*Our mission* is to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness by fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access.
- Student Loans
- Repaying Loans
- Defaulted Loans
- Loan Forgiveness
- Loan Servicers
- Grants & Programs
- Apply for Pell Grants
- Grants Forecast
- Apply for a Grant
- Laws & Guidance
- Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
- FERPA
- Civil Rights
- IDEA Website
- Data & Research
- Education Statistics
- Postsecondary Education Data
- ED Data Express
- Nation's Report Card
- What Works Clearinghouse
- Open Data Platform
- COVID Relief Data
- About Us
- Contact Us
- ED Offices
- Jobs
- Press Releases
- FAQs
- Recursos en español
- Budget, Performance
- Privacy Program
- Homeroom Blog
- Notices
- FOIA
- Privacy Policy
- Accessibility
- Security
- Information Quality
- Inspector General
- Whitehouse.gov
- USA.gov
- Benefits.gov
- Regulations.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATE STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
EXTRACTED FROM ITEM 1 OF FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1999, FOR THE
YEAR-TO-DATE, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             418
<SECURITIES>                                    27,008
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,746
<PP&E>                                          16,127
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,077
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  38,922
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,202
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            9,417
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            61
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,242
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    38,922
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,586
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,913
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,327)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,327)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,327)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.05)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2021422EN.01002401.xml

| 18.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 422/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.10.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 422/24

---

Action brought on 20 August 2021– Zeta farmaceutici v EUIPO — Specchiasol (EUPHYTOS)

(Case T-515/21)

(2021/C 422/32)

Language in which the application was lodged: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Zeta farmaceutici SpA (Vicenza, Italy) (represented by: F. Celluprica, F. Fischetti and F. De Bono, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Specchiasol Srl (Bussolengo, Italy)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark EUPHYTOS — European Union trade mark No 6 316 541

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 June in Case R 2094/2019-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | alter the contested decision and find and declare the contested mark, namely European Union trade mark No 6 316 541, invalid; |
| --- | --- |

—

alter the contested decision and find and declare the contested mark, namely European Union trade mark No 6 316 541, invalid;

| — | in the alternative, annul the contested decision and refer the case back to the Board of Appeal, ordering it to comply with the findings of the Court when issuing its new decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, annul the contested decision and refer the case back to the Board of Appeal, ordering it to comply with the findings of the Court when issuing its new decision;

| — | order EUIPO and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs, including those incurred in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs, including those incurred in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 60(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 60(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

LUCIEN DORT,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-2008

[January 9, 2020]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, 

Indian River County; Dan L. Vaughn, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

312010CF001720C.

Lucien Dort, Milton, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Mitchell A. Egber, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DAMOORGIAN, GERBER and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### COM. v. CAMEROTA, A.

3500 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/29/2017

CP-51-CR-0305521-2006 (Philadelphia)

Affirmed
No. 11-10426.

#### Under Seal *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB of Bay Resources  Ltd.
(the  "Company") for the three months ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "report"),  the
undersigned,  Joseph Gutnick, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

         (1)      The report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


November 12, 2004
                                 /s/  Joseph I. Gutnick
                                 -----------------------------
                                      Joseph I. Gutnick
                                      Chairman of the Board, President and
                                      Chief Executive Officer


                                                                              20
No. 11-9263.

#### Sweet *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
#### IN the INTEREST OF: J.S., a Minor

511 EDA 2017

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

09/21/2017

CP-51-AP-0001115-2016

(Philadelphia)

Affirmed
<PAGE>   

                                                         EXHIBIT 23

 
                  PUBLIC SERVICE ENTERPRISE GROUP INCORPORATED
 
                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
 
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration
Statements Nos. 33-44581, 33-44582 and 33-45491 of Public Service
Enterprise Group Incorporated on Form S-8 and Registration
Statement No. 33-49123 of Public Service Enterprise Group
Incorporated on Form S-3 of our report dated February 14, 1996,
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Public Service
Enterprise Group Incorporated for the year ended December 31, 1995. 


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
 
Parsippany, New Jersey
February 22, 1996
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 18

- 00321

- CV

ALMANZA BUSINESS GRO UP, LLC

, Appellant

v.

CBI LOGISTIC SERVICE S L.L.C.

, Appellee

From the 406th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013

- CVF

- 001798 D4 Honorable Oscar J. Hale, Jr., Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARTINEZ

, JUSTICE RIOS , AND JUSTICE WATKINS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that appellee, CBI Logistics Servi ces L.L.C., recover its cost s of this appeal from appellant, Almanza Business Group, LLC.

SIGNED May 15, 2019.

_____________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
268 KA 14-00574 PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., LINDLEY, DEJOSEPH, NEMOYER, AND TROUTMAN,

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,
V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
KEVIN V. BYNG, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

PETER J. DIGIORGIO, JR., UTICA, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
KEVIN V. BYNG, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT PRO SE. SCOTT D. MCNAMARA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, UTICA (STEVEN G. COX OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Oneida County Court (Barry M. Donalty, J.), rendered September 8, 2011. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted robbery in the third degree. It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Same memorandum as in People v Byng ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [Mar. 31, 2017]).

Entered: March 31, 2017 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
# Students

- Federal Student Aid Office of Enforcement Tip Submission Do you know about illegal acts or other conduct that might violate the Higher Education Act or federal rules for institutions of higher education?We want to hear from you!Email the FSA Office of Enforcement today at FSATips@ed.gov
- 1098-E Tax Form Student loan interest payments are reported on the IRS Form 1098-E, Student Loan Interest Statement.If you made federal student loan payments in 2022, you may be eligible to deduct a portion of the interest you paid on your 2022 federal tax return.
Prepared by R.R. Donnelley Financial -- EX-10.7




 Exhibit 10.7 

2014 CASH BONUS PLAN 
 Eligible Executives:
CEO, CFO, Division Executives, VPs, Senior Directors 
  

	 	•	 	Bonus pool is funded by achievement of payout targets with an 80% threshold, 100% target and 120% maximum, with ratable payouts in between 


 

	 	•	 	Bonus target payouts based on a percentage of base salary 

  

	 	•	 	Bonus are weighted 20% in Q1, 20% in Q2, 20% in Q3 and 40% in Q4 

  

	 	•	 	Payouts to the CEO and CFO will be weighted as follows: 

  

	 	•	 	40% based on consolidated revenue growth 

  

	 	•	 	30% based on EBITDA 

  

	 	•	 	15% based on growth of mobile 

  

	 	•	 	15% based on B2B growth 

  

	 	•	 	Payouts to the remaining executives will have weighted factors commensurate with job duties and divisional responsibilities 

  

													
	 	  	Bonus as a Percentage of Base Salary	 
	 	  	At minimum (80%)	 	 	At 100%	 	 	At maximum (120%)	 
	CEO	  	 	48	% 	 	 	60	% 	 	 	72	% 
	CFO	  	 	20	% 	 	 	40	% 	 	 	48	% 
	Division Executives	  	 	22	% 	 	 	35	% 	 	 	42	% 
	VPs	  	 	varies	  	 	 	25	% 	 	 	varies	  
	Senior Directors	  	 	varies	  	 	 	20	% 	 	 	varies
`[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 32 Reported in Senate (RS)]






                                                        Calendar No. 54
105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 32

                          [Report No. 105-19]


_______________________________________________________________________


                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 12, 1997

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

                              May 16, 1997

              Reported by Mr. Murkowski, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION


 
  To consent to certain amendments enacted by the Legislature of the 
      State of Hawaii to the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act, 1920.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled,
That, as required by section 4 of the Act entitled ``An 
Act to provide for the admission of the State of Hawaii into the 
Union'', approved March 18, 1959 (73 Stat. 4), the United States 
consents to the following amendments to the Hawaiian Homes Commission 
Act, 1920, adopted by the State of Hawaii in the manner required for 
State legislation:
            (1) Act 339 of the Session Laws of Hawaii, 1993.
            (2) Act 37 of the Session Laws of Hawaii, 1994.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 11, 1997.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
                                     





                                                        Calendar No. 54

105th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             H. J. RES. 32

                          [Report No. 105-19]

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

  To consent to certain amendments enacted by the Legislature of the 
      State of Hawaii to the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act, 1920.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 16, 1997

                       Reported without amendment`
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-40250

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JUAN AMAYA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:14-CR-1528-1

Before JONES, SOUTHWICK, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Juan Amaya has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Amaya has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief 

and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with 

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 15, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-40250 Document: 00513308791 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/15/2015
No. 15-40250

2

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 15-40250 Document: 00513308791 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/15/2015
# C_2022237EN.01002901.xml

| 20.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 237/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 237/29

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Bolzano (Italy) lodged on 8 March 2022 — Criminal proceedings against Unknown individuals

(Case C-178/22)

(2022/C 237/38)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale di Bolzano

Party to the main proceedings

Unknown individuals

Question referred

Does Article 15(1) of Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2002 (1) preclude a provision of national law such as that contained in Article 132 of Legislative Decree No 196 of 30 June 2003 (the Privacy Code), paragraph 3 of which was amended by Decree-Law No 132 of 30 September 2021, converted, with amendments, into Law No 178 of 23 November 2021 and, in its current version, provides:

| 3. | Within the retention period laid down by law, if there is sufficient evidence of the commission of an offence for which the law prescribes the penalty of life imprisonment or a maximum term of imprisonment of at least three years, determined in accordance with Article 4 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, or of an offence of threatening and harassing or disturbing persons by means of the telephone, where the threat or disturbance is serious, the data may, if relevant to establishing the facts, be acquired with the prior authorisation of the court, by way of reasoned order, at the request of the Public Prosecutor or upon an application by the legal representative of the accused, of the person under investigation, of the injured party or of any other private party’ |
| --- | --- |

3.

Within the retention period laid down by law, if there is sufficient evidence of the commission of an offence for which the law prescribes the penalty of life imprisonment or a maximum term of imprisonment of at least three years, determined in accordance with Article 4 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, or of an offence of threatening and harassing or disturbing persons by means of the telephone, where the threat or disturbance is serious, the data may, if relevant to establishing the facts, be acquired with the prior authorisation of the court, by way of reasoned order, at the request of the Public Prosecutor or upon an application by the legal representative of the accused, of the person under investigation, of the injured party or of any other private party’

---

(1)  Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2002 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector (Directive on privacy and electronic communications) (OJ 2002 L 201, p. 37).

---
<PAGE>
 
                                                                  EXHIBIT 23.01
 
                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
   
  We consent to the inclusion in this registration statement on Form S-1 of
our reports dated July 31, 1997, on our audits of the financial statements and
financial statement schedules of Entergy London Investments plc (formerly
Entergy Power UK plc) and London Electricity plc. We also consent to the
reference to our firm under the caption "Experts."     
 
COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
New Orleans, Louisiana
   
October 1, 1997
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 99(a)




              Section 906 Certification of Chief Executive Officer

<PAGE>


                    Certification of Chief Executive Officer
                         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)


         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2002 of the Citizens Holding Company (the "Company"), as filed with
the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Annual Report"), I,
Greg L. McKee, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1)   the Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
               13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
               amended; and

         (2)   the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents,
               in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.


                                                   /s/ Greg L. McKee
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Greg L. McKee,
                                                   Chief Executive Officer